<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-1989-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>The number fraction of iron-containing particles<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> affects OH, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets in the<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> atmospheric aqueous phase</article-title><alt-title>ROS levels and size-resolved iron</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{ROS levels and size-resolved iron}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~Khaled et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Khaled</surname><given-names>Amina</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Minghui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ervens</surname><given-names>Barbara</given-names></name>
          <email>barbara.ervens@uca.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6223-1635</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, Institut de Chimie de Clermont-Ferrand,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Plair SA, Route de Saint-Julien 275, Perly 1258, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Barbara Ervens (barbara.ervens@uca.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>11</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1989</fpage><lpage>2009</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>8</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>8</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>13</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 Amina Khaled et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1989/2022/acp-22-1989-2022.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1989/2022/acp-22-1989-2022.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1989/2022/acp-22-1989-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1989/2022/acp-22-1989-2022.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e139">Reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as OH, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, affect the oxidation capacity of the atmosphere and cause adverse health effects of particulate matter.
The role of transition metal ions (TMIs) in impacting the ROS concentrations and conversions in the atmospheric aqueous phase has been recognized for a long time.
Model studies usually assume that the total TMI mass as measured in bulk aerosol or cloud water samples is distributed equally across all particles or droplets.
This assumption is contrary to single-particle measurements that have shown that only a small number fraction of particles contain iron and other TMIs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), which implies that also not all cloud droplets contain TMIs.
In the current study, we apply a box model with an explicit multiphase chemical mechanism to simulate ROS formation and cycling in aqueous aerosol particles and cloud droplets.
Model simulations are performed for the range of 1 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 % for constant pH values of 3, 4.5 and 6 and constant total iron mass concentration  (10 or 50 ng per cubic meter of air). Model results are compared for two sets of simulations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100) and 100 % (FeBulk). We find the largest differences between model results in OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6. Under these conditions, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is subsaturated in the aqueous phase because of its high effective Henry's law constant and the fast chemical loss reactions of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical anion.
As the main reduction process of Fe(III) is its reaction with HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we show that the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> subsaturation leads to Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) ratios for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % that are lower by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 as compared to bulk model approaches.
This trend is largely independent of the total iron concentration, as both chemical source and sink rates of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scale with the iron concentration.
We compare model-derived reactive uptake parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the full range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not affected by the iron distribution, the calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values range from 0.0004 to 0.03 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>=<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and 100 %, respectively.
Implications of these findings are discussed for the application of lab-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in models to present reactive HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on aerosols.
We conclude that the iron distribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) should be taken into account to estimate the ROS concentrations and oxidation potential of particulate matter that might be overestimated by bulk sampling and model approaches.
Our study suggests that the number concentration of iron-containing particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be more important than the total iron mass concentration in determining ROS budgets and uptake rates in cloud and aerosol water.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page1990?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e568">The main oxidants in the atmospheric aqueous phases of cloud and aerosol particles include the hydroxyl radical (OH) and hydrogen peroxide (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), whose concentration levels are closely linked to the hydroperoxy radical (HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The concentrations of these reactive oxygen species (ROS) are influenced by various redox reactions of transition metal ions (TMIs).
Iron is the most abundant TMI in aerosol particles and cloud water. Its main sources include dust and coal combustion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.1"/> and biomass burning <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.2"/>. Its concentration in cloud water ranges from nano- to micromolar levels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.3"/>. Iron mass concentrations in aerosol samples  reach from less than 1 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to more than 100 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Schmücke, Germany) and sometimes up to several hundred nanograms per cubic meter (ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at other continental locations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.4"/>, and references therein).</p>
      <p id="d1e667">The role of transition metal ions in affecting the ROS concentration levels and redox reactions in clouds and particles has been explored in many model, lab and field studies, e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.5"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.6"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.7"/>.
Reactions of iron and other TMIs (e.g., copper) in the atmosphere have also been linked to the oxidative potential of particulate matter, causing oxidative stress in the respiratory tract and lungs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.8"/>.
In particular, the oxidation of iron(II) by hydrogen peroxide (Fenton reaction) has been identified as one of the main chemical sources of the OH radical in cloud water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.9"/>, aqueous-phase aerosol particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.10"/> and lung fluid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.11"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e692">TMI concentrations in the cloud and aerosol phases are usually reported based on bulk measurements representing the total TMI mass per aqueous- or gas-phase volume.
However, single-particle analyses have shown that iron is only present in a small number fraction of particles: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.12"/> found that up to 15 % of particles in the diameter range between 0.5 and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m contain iron.
Similar number fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–15 %) were observed in Shanghai, where air masses were also affected by dust storms or biomass and coal burning <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.13"/>. A similar size range for iron-containing particles but smaller average number fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 %) was found above the English Channel in air masses affected by steel works <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.14"/>.
As particles in this size range commonly act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), these analyses suggest that not all cloud droplets contain iron and that also the measured iron mass concentration in aerosol populations is not equally distributed among all particles. Drop-size-resolved cloud water measurements at a continental background site have shown that iron and copper are present in the same drop size range, whereas manganese is more abundant in larger droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.15"/>. This may suggest that CCN were comprised of internal mixtures of iron and copper, whereas manganese-containing particles were externally mixed and of different hygroscopicity and/or different sizes.</p>
      <p id="d1e733">The oxidation state of iron affects its solubility and thus its bioavailability and biogeochemical cycles in the atmosphere and oceans. Generally, ferrous salts are more soluble than ferric salts, with increasing solubility under acidic conditions, e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.16"/>.
Results from a global model study revealed large differences in predicted and observed iron solubility; observed Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) ratios were on average between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %, with larger variability in coarse than in fine particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.17"/>. The Fe(II) fractions in particle samples above oceans have been shown to be above 30 %–75 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.18"/>.
Measurement of the Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) ratio on a single-particle basis revealed ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % for particles from various sources <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.19"/>. In cloud water, Fe(II) often dominates the total iron concentration, in particular during daytime, when iron(III) hydroxy and organo complexes are reduced by photolysis processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.20"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e788">Multiphase chemistry models are usually initialized with bulk concentrations of iron to make predictions on the role of aqueous-phase chemistry in ROS levels (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx80" id="altparen.21"/>), sulfate formation (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx11" id="altparen.22"/>) or iron deposition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.23"/>.
In a previous model study, we have demonstrated that such bulk approaches may not be appropriate for highly reactive compounds as redistribution and diffusion processes among droplets of chemical composition might lead to nonlinear effects impacting concentration levels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.24"/>. While that study was focused on the biodegradation of organics by bacteria, which are only present in a small number fraction of cloud droplets, we apply the same idea in the present study to the ROS cycling, dependent on the number fraction of iron-containing particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e803">We perform box model simulations with a detailed gas- and aqueous-phase chemical mechanism, in which a constant iron mass concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (nanograms per cubic meter of air) is distributed to a fraction of (i) cloud droplets or (ii) aqueous aerosol particles. We investigate the conditions in terms of pH, iron distribution and total iron mass, under which the number fraction of iron-containing particles significantly affects the concentration levels and phase transfer of OH, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmospheric multiphase system.
We discuss the potential implications of these effects for the interpretation of measurements and model studies of the iron oxidation state, radical uptake rates onto aqueous aerosol particles and ROS budgets and oxidative potentials of aerosol and cloud water.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1991?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Multiphase box model</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e860">We use a box model with detailed gas- and aqueous-phase chemical mechanisms.
The gas-phase chemical mechanism with 58 reactions is based on the NCAR Master Chemical Mechanism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.25"/>. The aqueous-phase chemical mechanism includes 43 reactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.26"/> (Tables S1–S3 in the Supplement). Phase transfer processes for 14 species are described kinetically based on the resistance model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.27"/> (Table S4). The model uses the standard equations for multiphase processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.28"/>:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M60" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mt</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LWC</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LWC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>phase  transfer  rate</mml:mtext></mml:munder><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>chem   rate</mml:mtext></mml:munder><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mt</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LWC</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LWC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>phase transfer  rate</mml:mtext></mml:munder><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>chem   rate</mml:mtext></mml:munder><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where both the gas-phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and aqueous-phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations are expressed in units of moles per gram of air,  LWC is the liquid water content (vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> vol), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the (effective) Henry's law constant, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the chemical source and loss rates in the aqueous and gas phases (moles per gram of air per second). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the constant for ideal gases (0.082058 L atm (K mol)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and absolute temperature (K). The mass transfer coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mt</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is defined as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M74" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mt</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the drop radius, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the gas-phase diffusion coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the mass accommodation coefficient, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the molecular weight. The mass transfer coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mt</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> takes into account gas-phase diffusion and the mass accommodation, i.e., the probability that a molecule that hits the droplet (or particle) surface is taken up. It is the inverse of the characteristic time for these two resistances.
Its full derivation can be found in the literature, e.g., by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.29"/>, and is therefore not repeated here.
In our model studies, it is assumed that all solutes are homogeneously mixed and no concentration gradients exist between the gas–aqueous interface and the bulk of the aqueous phase.
This assumption is justified if chemical loss processes in the aqueous phase are comparatively slow, so that aqueous-phase diffusion can evenly distribute the species throughout the aqueous volume. The competition between aqueous-phase diffusion and chemical loss in the aqueous phase is commonly quantified by the dimensionless diffuso-reactive parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. S.1 in the Supplement, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="altparen.30"/>).
This parameter does not take into account chemical sources within the aqueous phase.
As discussed in a previous study, the Fenton reaction can act as a such a source for the OH radical in aqueous solution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.31"/>.
A detailed comparison and discussion of the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the role of aqueous-phase diffusion can be found in the Supplement (Sect. S2).</p>
      <p id="d1e1381">The box model considers monodisperse cloud droplet or wet aerosol particle populations with constant diameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m for cloud droplets and 300 nm for aqueous aerosol particles, respectively. The simulations are run at constant temperature (285.6 K), pressure (9.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa) and air density (1.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Model simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e1455">The schematic of the model setup together with the main ROS formation and conversion processes are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. Results of two model approaches will be compared:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1462"><italic>FeBulk</italic>. All droplets (particles) have the same chemical composition. The iron concentration is identical in all droplets (particles). The fraction of iron-containing droplets (particles) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>=<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1494"><italic>FeN</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>100</italic>. A subset of the number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of droplets (or particles) is initialized with iron, whereas the remainder of the droplets (particles) is iron-free. In the base case simulations, we assume that the number fraction of iron-containing droplets (particles) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is varied from 1 %–99 % in sensitivity studies (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>).</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e1552">We assume an iron mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>=<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ng per cubic meter of air). (Some sensitivity studies for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>=<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ng per cubic meter of air are discussed.)  Therefore, in the FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 approach, the aqueous-phase iron concentration [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>] is higher in the iron-containing droplets (particles) than in the FeBulk approach as the iron mass is distributed to fewer droplets (particles). Simulations are performed for constant values of pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3, 4.5 and 6. All model parameters are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Gas-phase species are initialized with the values in Table S5 and are not replenished throughout the simulations.
Chemical and phase transfer rates are analyzed after a simulation time of 400 s. This timescale refers approximately to the lifetime of a single cloud droplet.
It can be estimated based on updraft and downdraft velocities a cloud droplet experiences and on cloud thickness (e.g., average vertical velocity of 0.5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout cloud that is 100 m thick, as typical values for shallow stratocumulus clouds).  To demonstrate that our results and conclusions do not strongly depend on the choice of the timescale, we compare the main source and loss processes of the three species at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>=<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>=<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>). During even longer timescales, the concentrations may change in the box model; however, this may not be realistic since highly reactive gases are quickly depleted (e.g., SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas in the real atmosphere, emissions might replenish them.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1685">Model schematic. <bold>(a)</bold> FeBulk: the total iron mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>=<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is equally distributed among all droplets or particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>=<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). <bold>(b)</bold> FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100: the same iron mass concentration is distributed among a subset of droplets or particles (base case: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>=<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). Major ROS processes are phase transfer (blue), ROS net production (orange), ROS conversions (red) and ROS loss (black). Model parameters are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1989/2022/acp-22-1989-2022-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1800">Model parameters for multiphase simulations for cloud droplet and aerosol populations. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the number concentration, LWC the liquid water content, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the total iron mass concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the number concentration of droplets or particles that contain iron and [Fe]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> the aqueous-phase concentration of iron. Numbers in parentheses denote values or parameter ranges of sensitivity studies.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FeBulk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cloud droplets</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Iron-free</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Iron-containing</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20  (10, 40)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20 (10, 40)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20  (10, 40)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">98  (99–1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 (1–99)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LWC (g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.41 (0.416–0.042)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 (0.042–0.416)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10  (50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10  (50)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 (1–99)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[Fe]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21  (0.43–42)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Iron-free</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Iron-containing</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.3  (0.15, 0.6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3  (0.15, 0.6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3  (0.15, 0.6)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1470  (1485–15)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30  (15–1485)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LWC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.6  (20.8–0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.6   (0.3–20.8)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10  (50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10  (50)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2  (1–99)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[Fe]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (M)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.41  (0.00008–0.82)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1992?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Model results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Aqueous-phase concentrations and rates</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Cloud droplets</title>
      <p id="d1e2326">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> summarizes the ROS concentrations and the chemical and phase transfer rates for the cloud case at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5; the corresponding figures for simulations at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 and 6 are shown in Fig. S1 (Supplement).
The net transfer rates (moles per gram of air per second) into the aqueous phase are shown in the yellow boxes. For FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100, the relative contributions (%) of this rate into the iron-free and iron-containing droplets are shown next to the arrows.
The phase transfer rates are additionally shown in units of moles per liter per second (using the air density of 1.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and LWCs in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), together with the chemical source and loss rates in the aqueous phase (M s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the corresponding aqueous-phase ROS concentrations (M) (white boxes).
If the effect of iron is negligible on aqueous-phase concentrations and aqueous-phase rates, there should be no concentration difference between any droplets, neither between the results for FeBulk and FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 nor between the iron-free and<?pagebreak page1993?> iron-containing droplets. In addition, the ratio of the phase transfer rates should also be equal to the ratio of the LWCs of the two drop classes (98 % : 2 %).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2407">Multiphase scheme for cloud water showing the phase transfer and chemical source and loss rates in the aqueous phase, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5. <bold>(a)</bold> FeBulk approach. <bold>(b)</bold> FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 approach with a fraction of iron-containing droplets of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 %. Numbers below the species names are aqueous-phase concentrations (M), and chemical and phase transfer rates are shown in moles per liter per second. Net phase transfer rates near the top of the figure are expressed in gas-phase units (moles per gram of air per second); the relative contributions (%) into the iron-free and iron-containing droplets are shown next to the arrows. The bulk concentrations at the bottom of panel <bold>(b)</bold> represent the bulk concentrations weighted by the contributions of the two droplet classes to total LWC (98 % : 2 %). </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1989/2022/acp-22-1989-2022-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2494">All ROS are predicted to be taken up into cloud water, independently of the iron distribution at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), and also their ratio of the phase transfer rates nearly corresponds to the ratio of the LWCs of the two droplet classes (98 % : 2 %). Significant deviations from this theoretical value occur at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 for HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S1b) and at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that is predicted to evaporate from iron-free droplets (Fig. S1d).</p>
      <p id="d1e2549">The H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in all droplets under all conditions and pH values (Fig. S1) correspond to the equilibrium concentrations according to Henry's law, in agreement with previous studies that have shown that H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is at thermodynamic equilibrium in cloud water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.32"/>.
At pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 and 4.5, the efficient H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption is compensated by a relatively higher uptake rate, resulting in the efficient replenishment of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and equilibrium concentration. The uptake rates (in M s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) between FeBulk and the iron-free droplets in the FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 approach are similar (e.g., for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : 0.56  and 0.53 M s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas they are higher for uptake into the iron-containing droplets (2.2 M s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Since these droplets only comprise 2 % of the total LWC, this difference is not reflected in the net uptake rate.
At pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 (Fig. S1c and d), the majority of cloud droplets are predicted to be a source of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; the only exception is the iron-containing droplets in the FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 approach, from which H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> evaporates due to less efficient chemical H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption in the aqueous phase.</p>
      <p id="d1e2767">The OH concentrations differ by nearly 1 order of magnitude between the iron-free and iron-containing cloud droplets (5.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M vs. 3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b); the concentration in the FeBulk model is even slightly lower (4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a). The reasons for these differences are explored in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>, where the individual chemical processes affecting the concentrations are analyzed.</p>
      <p id="d1e2834">The bulk aqueous-phase OH concentration in the FeBulk approach is approximately 50 % higher (4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M) as compared to 6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M for FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). A much greater discrepancy of nearly 1 order of magnitude between the two approaches is predicted at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, whereas the difference in the bulk concentrations at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 is smaller (Fig. S1). These concentrations corresponded to those in bulk cloud water samples from cloud droplet populations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 %, provided that chemical processes in the sample upon sampling do not change the ROS levels (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>).
For all cases, the chemical source and loss rates of the OH radical compensate for each other, leading to a relatively small uptake rate of the moderately soluble OH radical into the aqueous phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is not significantly affected by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2984">The concentration difference of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between iron-free and iron-containing droplets is nearly 2 orders of magnitude (2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M vs.  8.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M), whereas the concentration for FeBulk is predicted to be between these two values (8.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).
The difference in the concentrations is even greater (factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200) at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 (Fig. S1d), whereas it is less than a factor of 3 at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3. These trends suggest that the concentrations are dependent  on pH (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>).
The comparison of the bulk aqueous-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations resulting from the FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 approach (bottom of Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b, S2b and d) to those in FeBulk shows that at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5 and 6, the total HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is underestimated by about 1 order of magnitude.
At pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3, the chemical loss rate of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in iron-containing droplets is relatively larger than its chemical source rate  (74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> vs.  66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. S1b).
This imbalance in the chemical rates leads to a very efficient HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake into iron-containing droplets.
Consequently, the phase transfer into these droplets comprises 13 %  of the total uptake rate, whereas at higher pH values the contributions correspond to the ratio of LWCs between the two droplet classes (98 % : 2 %).
The higher Henry's law constant of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and rate constants of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions as compared to those of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at higher pH lead to increasingly lower HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations with increasing pH.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Aqueous aerosol particles</title>
      <p id="d1e3347">Since the LWC of the aqueous aerosol particles is smaller by a factor of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> than in clouds, the aqueous-phase iron concentration is accordingly higher, and so are all chemical rates of iron reactions. Similar to cloud water, the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is neither significantly affected by the iron distribution nor by iron reactions; i.e., at a given pH value its aqueous-phase concentration is nearly the same in all particles.
At pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5 and 6, evaporation of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is predicted for FeBulk and from the iron-free particles in FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b and S2b and d).
However, since the uptake rate of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into the iron-containing droplets is much higher, exceeding the evaporation rate by a factor of 25 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 % vs.  104 %, pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>143 % vs.  243 % at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6), aqueous particles represent a net sink of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3494">Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> but for the aerosol case (model parameters in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1989/2022/acp-22-1989-2022-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3507">Similar to the cloud case, the OH concentrations in the aqueous phase of FeBulk are between those in the iron-free and iron-containing particles for FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100. The OH concentrations do not show a strong pH dependence, but their bulk values are about a factor of 3 lower for the FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 approach (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 %) than for the FeBulk approach (1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M vs.  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M). Even at the high iron concentrations as present in aerosol water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.41 M), the chemical source and loss rates of OH nearly cancel out, leading to a relatively small uptake rate.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1994?><p id="d1e3601">The HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the FeBulk approach are comparable to those as predicted for cloud water at the same pH value. However, the concentrations in the iron-free and iron-containing particles differ by 4 orders of magnitude at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 (1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M, Fig. S2d). The resulting bulk aqueous-phase concentrations are at least 1 order of magnitude underestimated by FeBulk (pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3); this difference is even a factor of 2000 at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>d and  S2d).
While the chemical loss rate of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is nearly equal to or even larger than its source rate at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5 and 6, at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 the source rate exceeds the loss rate resulting in evaporation of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the 2 % iron-containing particles (Fig. S2b). However, since the uptake rate into the iron-containing particles is larger than this evaporation rate, the net flux of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is an uptake into the particle phase.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Gas-phase concentrations (OH, HO${}_{{2}}$) and mixing ratios (H${}_{{2}}$O${}_{{2}}$)}?><title>Gas-phase concentrations (OH, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and mixing ratios (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d1e3794">The gas-phase concentrations of OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mixing ratios of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. S3 as a function of time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s) in the presence of cloud droplets and aerosol particles, respectively, at the three pH values considered here and for the two assumed iron distributions in the aqueous phase. The H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio in the presence of cloud water is very quickly reduced to about 50 % of its initial<?pagebreak page1995?> concentration (1 ppb) due to partitioning to the aqueous phase.
Both the pH value and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have a small effect on the  H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio.
The small increase of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over time is in agreement with findings in a recent multiphase box model intercomparison <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.33"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3911">The OH concentrations are on the order of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., typical concentrations as found for continental daytime conditions. These concentrations build up within a few seconds and do not largely change over the time period considered here.
The difference of up to a factor of 5 in the OH concentrations in the presence of cloud droplets with a pH value of 3 and 6, respectively, cannot be directly explained by any OH reactions in the aqueous phase but is rather a consequence of the OH–HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle in the multiphase system (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).
At pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, the effective Henry's law constant for HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is highest, and therefore, most HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is partitioned to the aqueous phase, resulting in the lowest fractions of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the gas phase. The gas-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are on the order of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, in agreement with predictions from other atmospheric multiphase chemistry models (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="altparen.34"/>).
Generally, the pH value and iron distributions  cause smaller differences in the presence of aerosol particles as compared to the cloud case, since the liquid water content of particles is smaller by several orders of magnitude, and therefore a smaller fraction of the species is dissolved.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>3.1.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Partitioning coefficient $\epsilon$}?><title>Partitioning coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e4030">The partitioning coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is often used to describe the distribution of species between the aqueous and gas phases in the atmospheric multiphase system, e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.35"/>. It is defined as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M313" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the aqueous-phase concentration (M) and gas-phase partial pressure (atm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the (effective) Henry's law constant (M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Accordingly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates situations when the aqueous phase is subsaturated.</p>
      <p id="d1e4148">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the three ROS are summarized in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> for the cloud and aerosol simulations at three pH values.
The fact that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 shows that H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is in thermodynamic equilibrium and explains why its concentrations do not differ among iron-containing and iron-free droplets (particles) (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> and S2).</p>
      <p id="d1e4210">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the presence of cloud droplets (red symbols, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b) are on the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01–0.1. The values for iron-containing aerosol particles show a distinct trend with highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in iron-containing particles, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in iron-free particles is lower by 2 and 3 orders of magnitude, respectively. The lack of a clear trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with pH suggests that the main formation and loss processes of OH are pH-independent.
The differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scale with the OH concentrations in aerosol particles that differ by 3 orders of magnitude between iron-containing and iron-free particles in the FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 approach and the concentration in the FeBulk case (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>).
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in cloud water do not exhibit such strong differences, which is also reflected in the more similar concentrations in all droplets (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4309">Partitioning coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for <bold>(a)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> OH and <bold>(c)</bold> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 , 4.5 and 6 for FeBulk (filled symbols) and FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 in 98 % iron-free (squares) and 2 % iron-containing droplets (triangles). Results are shown for simulations of cloud droplets (green) and aerosol particles (orange) at three pH values (3, 4.5 and 6); lines are added to guide the eye.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1989/2022/acp-22-1989-2022-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4376">The difference between the concentration in iron-free and iron-containing particles is up to 3 orders of magnitude (pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3, Fig. S2b), which is also reflected in the same difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b).</p>
      <p id="d1e4395">For the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical, iron reactions cause a significant deviation from thermodynamic equilibrium at high pH, resulting in decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing pH.
At high pH, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is more efficiently consumed due to the higher rate constants of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical anion as compared to those with the undissociated HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical. Unlike for OH, for which the smallest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is seen in iron-free particles, the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is found for iron-containing particles – which shows that the concentration differences due to iron distribution for OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> have different reasons:
whereas iron leads to efficient OH formation, it causes significant HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Relative contributions of chemical reactions and phase transfer to ROS source and loss rates in the aqueous phase</title>
      <p id="d1e4521">To understand the trends in concentrations, reaction rates and partitioning coefficients with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and pH as discussed in the previous section, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> summarizes the main chemical pathways for the three ROS for the cloud and aerosol cases for the same conditions as in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>.
The individual chemical source (S) and loss (L) processes are indicated between the figure panels for the cloud (top part of figure) and aerosol (bottom part) cases.
Only chemical processes are listed that contribute to more than 1 % to the total rate in each simulation.
As the phase transfer (PT) can be a source (i.e., uptake) or loss (i.e., evaporation) process for the aqueous-phase species, its contribution is placed between the chemical sources and losses. The total source and loss rates (mol g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are indicated in the boxes in the upper right of each panel.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4573">Relative contributions of chemical and phase transfer rates to the total sources and losses of the three ROS. The total rates (moles per gram of air per second) are shown in boxes in the upper right of each panel. For the FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 approach, the contributions in iron-free and iron-containing droplets (particles) are displayed as open and dashed bars and those for the FeBulk approach as solid filled bars. Simulations were performed at constant pH values of pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 (red), 4.5 (black) and 6 (blue) for cloud conditions <bold>(a)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> OH and <bold>(c)</bold> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerosol conditions  <bold>(d)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e)</bold> OH and <bold>(f)</bold> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The chemical aqueous-phase source (S) and loss (L) reactions are listed between the panels.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1989/2022/acp-22-1989-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1996?><p id="d1e4670">Given its high Henry's law constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake contributes nearly 50 % to the total H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source at pH  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5 in cloud water (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a) and even more in aerosol water (50 %–80 %) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d).
However, the uptake occurs mostly (98 %) into iron-free cloud droplets, whereas in the aerosol case, most H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken up by the iron-containing particles. This trend was already shown in the comparison of Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b.
The main loss of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in cloud water is the pH-dependent reaction with sulfur(IV) (L1 in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a), whose rate decreases with increasing pH (R4 in Table S1). Therefore, the chemical loss of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in cloud water is very inefficient at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6  (2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 vs.  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a).
The rate of the recombination of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (S1 in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a) increases with pH since the reaction of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is much faster than with undissociated HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table S1).  Therefore, more H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is formed at  pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 than at lower pH, leading to H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> evaporation from cloud droplets at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> represents a snapshot of the rates after a simulation time of 400 s.
We have chosen this relatively short time, since gases are not replenished during the box model simulations as no emissions are considered.
At longer timescales (after 2000 s), the conclusions would not be drastically different (Fig. S4); the only major difference is the loss of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by sulfur(IV) (L1 in Fig. S4a) as SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is consumed quickly within the first few minutes.</p>
      <p id="d1e5136">In aerosol water, the Fenton reaction (L2, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, d) is the main loss reaction of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The main H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source process is the reaction of  Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S2), whose rate increases with increasing pH value.
Since in iron-free particles, the chemical loss rate (L1) decreases with pH, but its source rate (S1) increases, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> evaporates from iron-free particles.
In iron-containing particles, both the main source and sink reactions are directly dependent on the Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (S2, L2).
As the iron concentration in the iron-containing particles is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 times higher for FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 than for FeBulk, it seems surprising at first that the chemical rates do not scale by this factor.
Furthermore, the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is much higher in iron-free than in iron-containing particles, in particular at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6. Also this trend, thus, cannot explain the lower chemical H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source rates of S2.
Therefore, only a difference in the Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration can explain the differences in the chemical rates of the chemical H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources and sinks (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>).</p>
      <?pagebreak page1997?><p id="d1e5333">Independently of the iron distribution, the relative importance of the uptake of the OH radical into aerosol particles' cloud water decreases with increasing pH, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 % at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b).
As the rate of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction with ozone (S1) increases with pH, the relative importance of this reaction increases with increasing pH value.
The loss of OH in the aqueous phase is due to reactions with organic compounds; the rate of L1 in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b and e represents the sum of all reaction rates of OH with organics in Table S1. As the rate constants of OH reactions with carboxylates are generally higher than those with their corresponding acids, the chemical loss rate in cloud water increases with pH.
The most striking difference in the source and loss patterns of OH between cloud and aerosol water is the dominating role of the Fenton reaction (S2) as OH source in aerosol water. It contributes nearly 100 % of the sources at all pH values, making the OH uptake as a source negligible.
Similar to the trends as described above for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the chemical rates of the Fenton reaction as OH source (S2) are much smaller in FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 than for FeBulk, which can again be explained by the lower Fe(II) concentration at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As the uptake rate of OH is fairly low as compared to its chemical rates due to its low Henry's law constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table S4), the chemical source rate is nearly fully compensated for by the chemical loss rate that under all pH and LWC conditions results in (nearly) identical values.</p>
      <p id="d1e5461">The only major sources of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the reactions of Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with molecular oxygen (S1) and the OH reactions with organics (S2) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c and f). The slight increase in the overall reaction rate of S2 with pH explains the highest chemical source rate in all droplets at the highest pH.
Its main loss reactions are the reactions of Fe(III) (free Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the hydroxy complexes [Fe(OH)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, 2). The dominance of these processes for the loss of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to very efficient uptake into iron-containing droplets.
The rate constants of these loss reactions with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are about 3 orders of magnitude higher than those with HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (R27, R28 and<?pagebreak page1998?> R35–R38 in Table S1). This results in the subsaturation of  HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the aqueous phase, i.e., decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing pH (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c).
This effect is more pronounced in aerosol water than in cloud water because of the higher total Fe concentration in particles.
The highly efficient loss of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at high pH results in the lowest HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the iron-containing droplets at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 (Fig. S2d). Since the reactions of Fe(III) with HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the main reduction processes of Fe(III), the lower HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration leads to inefficient Fe(III) to Fe(II) conversion and relatively higher Fe(III) concentrations (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Aqueous-phase concentrations as a function of \texorpdfstring{$F_{{\protect\chem{N,Fe}}}$}{h}}?><title>Aqueous-phase concentrations as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Comparison of bulk aqueous-phase concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e5773">The values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % and 100 % likely represent extreme values for the iron distribution in cloud droplet or particle populations. Depending on abundance and
proximity of iron emissions sources, fewer particles (and thus droplets) may also contain iron; this would translate into an even higher iron aqueous-phase concentration.
Under such conditions, iron would not be completely dissolved and available for aqueous-phase reactions. Therefore, in the following, we limit our discussion to values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %.
In order to illustrate the total ROS budget in the aqueous phase, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> shows the bulk aqueous-phase concentrations [ROS]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (M) calculated based on the LWC-weighted average ROS concentration in the iron-containing and iron-free droplets or particles:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M473" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROS</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROS</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ironfree</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROS</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">iron</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where [ROS]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ironfree</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and [ROS]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">iron</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the ROS concentrations in the iron-free and iron-containing droplets, respectively. (Note that the same calculation was performed for the bulk aqueous-phase concentrations in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, S1 and S2).
Results are shown for the full range of 1 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e5986">The H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations do not show any dependence on the iron distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and d).
This trend can be explained because (i) in cloud water the main chemical source and loss processes are independent of iron, whereas (ii) in aerosol water, both the main chemical source and loss reactions are dependent on the Fe(II) concentration.
The same set of processes can also explain why the resulting aqueous-phase H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are independent of the total iron mass. In a sensitivity study, we increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 50 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which results in very similar H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Fig. S5).
Thus, a higher iron mass concentration increases both rates by the same factor, resulting in nearly equal H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations for both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e6117">The OH concentration in cloud water is underestimated by FeBulk by up to a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 (pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b).
The large difference at the highest pH is the consequence of the more efficient OH formation at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 by the reaction of  O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>).
Since in the FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 approach the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is about 1 order of magnitude higher at this pH value than for FeBulk, the OH concentration is generally underestimated by assuming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 %.
It can be concluded that in clean conditions, i.e., when the pH value of cloud water is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>5, even for relatively low iron mass concentrations, iron distribution should be taken into account to obtain the correct OH concentrations in cloud water. The deviations are only slightly higher for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> than for 10 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S5).
In aerosol water, the OH concentration is generally overestimated by FeBulk by factors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>e and S5e), respectively.
The lower OH concentration in the FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 approach is a consequence of the lower Fe(II) concentration (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>), which leads to less OH formation by the Fenton reaction.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e6362">Bulk aqueous-phase concentrations of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the cloud <bold>(a–c)</bold> and aerosol <bold>(d–f)</bold> cases as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the model parameters listed in Table 1.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1989/2022/acp-22-1989-2022-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e6421">The HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are underestimated in cloud water by the FeBulk approach, approximately by the same factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2–5) as the OH radical, with the highest bias at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c). At pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3, the difference between the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations for the two iron mass concentrations is much larger than for the other pH values.
Unlike for the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH concentrations, that are very similar for both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations more clearly deviate for the two iron masses considered in Fig. S5.
This can be explained by the less efficient Fe(III) reduction in the cloud droplets at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at all pH values (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e6578">In aerosol water, the aqueous-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are nearly identical for wide ranges of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 and 4.5, whereas the difference at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 % and 100 % is about 1 order of magnitude at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>f).
Thus, the aqueous-phase budget of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be significantly underestimated – independently of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – with increasing pH if the iron distribution across the particle distribution is not properly accounted for.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Enhanced H${}_{{2}}$O${}_{{2}}$ partitioning into aerosol water: $K_{{\protect\chem{H,H_{2}O_{2}}}}$\,$=$\,2.7\,$\times$\,10${}^{{8}}$\,M\,atm${}^{{-1}}$}?><title>Enhanced H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> partitioning into aerosol water: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <?pagebreak page1999?><p id="d1e6792">Strictly, Henry's law constants are not applicable to highly concentrated aqueous solutions such as aerosol water. Simultaneous measurements of particle-bound and gas-phase H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations suggest that it partitions much more efficiently to the particle phase than predicted based on its physical Henry's law constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Despite large uncertainties in such measurements and of related parameters such as the aerosol water content, various studies revealed that the partitioning of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between the gas and the aerosol aqueous phases may be more appropriately described with an effective Henry's law constant of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx86" id="paren.36"/>. The observation by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.37"/> of higher H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in coarse-mode particles than in fine-mode particles might point to a size-dependent chemical particle composition with higher iron content in coarse particles that often contain dust.</p>
      <p id="d1e6976">To explore the effects of such enhanced partitioning, we performed a sensitivity study, using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Fig. S6, the aqueous-phase concentrations and net phase transfer rates of the three ROS are compared to those using the physical Henry's law constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). No other parameter was changed as to the best of our knowledge corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for OH and/or HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are not available. We perform this comparison only for the aerosol case, as numerous measurements have shown that the partitioning of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into cloud water can be satisfactorily described by its <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="altparen.38"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e7158">As expected, a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results in higher H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aqueous-phase concentrations by 3 orders of magnitude.
Unlike for the low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the higher partitioning leads to smaller H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations for FeBulk than for FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 by up to 1 order of magnitude and pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.
The OH concentration in the aqueous phase is predicted to decrease with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, unlike in the base case simulation where we showed the opposite trend (Fig. S6b).
The higher H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration generally increases the importance of the Fenton reaction and photolysis for OH production in the aqueous phase.
While the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations for the two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values do not differ at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, they are significantly smaller by several orders of magnitude for the higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S6c).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2000?><sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Implications of $F_{{\protect\chem{N,Fe}}}<100$\,{\%} for model and field studies}?><title>Implications of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for model and field studies</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Oxidation state of iron: Fe(II)\,$/$\,Fe(total)}?><title>Oxidation state of iron: Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total)</title>
      <p id="d1e7433">The iron oxidation state determines its solubility and bioavailability since Fe(II) salts are usually more soluble than Fe(III) compounds. Fe(II) usually dominates during daytime because Fe(III) complexes are readily photolyzed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.39"/>. Reported measurements are based on analyses that are performed on bulk samples, where redox reactions of iron can occur after collection and combination of all cloud droplets or aerosol particles, respectively.
The trends and overall Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) (or Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(III)) ratios have been reproduced in several model studies that all assumed that iron is present in the complete aqueous phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.40"/>.
Thus, the agreement between measured and predicted data is not surprising as both types of studies imply that the total soluble iron is evenly distributed throughout the total aqueous volume.</p>
      <p id="d1e7456">However, our study reveals that these Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) ratios are not the true ratios present in the atmospheric aqueous phases if iron is only present in a small number fraction of particles or droplets.
In cloud water, the soluble iron fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total)) might be overestimated by up to factor of 2 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a), whereas this bias might be even higher in aerosol particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b).
The overview articles by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.41"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.42"/> show large ranges of the Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) fraction (10 %–100 %). Interestingly the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="text.43"/> that investigated single particles reports values at the lower end of this range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 %).
We cannot state with certainty that this finding is due to different aerosol composition or origin or indeed points to a more accurate representation of the Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) ratio in individual particles rather than in bulk samples.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e7528">Predicted Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) ratios at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 , 4.5 and 6 and the conditions as given in Table 1. <bold>(a)</bold> Cloud, <bold>(b)</bold> aerosol and <bold>(c)</bold> aerosol with enhanced partitioning of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2"/>). </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1989/2022/acp-22-1989-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e7641">If the Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) may be considered a measure of the bioavailability of iron, it might be actually lower than derived from ambient samples or model studies, if they apply a bulk approach.
Our results suggest that parameterizations of the Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) ratios, as, for example, suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.44"/>, might have to be further refined to account for the effects due to the iron distribution across particle populations.
In aqueous media that consist of a bulk aqueous phase (e.g., oceans, lung fluid, to some extent also rainwater), the Fe(II) fraction will be appropriately represented by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 % (FeBulk).
The timescales for the Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(III) ratio to adjust from conditions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 %  will depend on the rates of iron redox processes and on the solubility and dissolution kinetics of ferrous and ferric salts, which, in turn, may be a function of other solutes and liquid water content.
If H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is more soluble in aerosol water than in cloud water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2"/>), the Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) ratio does not exceed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % for any <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c).
Thus,  HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is always efficiently consumed by Fe(III), even at the highest considered iron mass (50 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. S7c). This predicted independence of the Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) ratio as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in contrast to the predicted strong dependence using the physical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be used to guide future experiments to determine the “best” value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for aerosol water.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Reactive uptake parameters $\gamma$}?><title>Reactive uptake parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>4.2.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Calculation of $\gamma _{{\protect\chem{OH}}}$ and $\gamma _{{\protect\chem{HO_{2}}}}$}?><title>Calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e8040">The uptake of OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into aerosol particles is often parameterized by the dimensionless reactive uptake coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that is derived as a function of the first-order radical loss (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">loss</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) onto aerosol particles. For the derivation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> based on lab studies, it is assumed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> solely depends on the molecular speed and the droplet surface. However, it has been discussed that the reactive uptake coefficient in atmospheric applications should also include a term to account for gas-phase diffusion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.45"/>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M655" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">loss</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being the total droplet surface area per air volume and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>  the molecular speed,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M658" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molar mass (g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas constant and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the absolute temperature (K) (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx60" id="altparen.46"/>). Accordingly, the phase transfer rate of radicals into the particle phase can be described as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M663" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Radical</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">loss</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Radical</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            and the reactive uptake coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be derived as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M665" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">loss</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e8316">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>.
If gas-phase diffusion is neglected in the derivation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the last term in the denominator of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>) is set to zero (Eq. S.3). To demonstrate the impact of gas-phase diffusion on the reactive uptake parameter, we compare <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values calculated with Eq. (10) to values without consideration of gas-phase diffusion (Sect. S3 in the Supplement).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e8372">Reactive uptake coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from the multiphase model studies at three pH values for <bold>(a, b)</bold> cloud and <bold>(c, d)</bold> aerosol conditions. </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1989/2022/acp-22-1989-2022-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page2001?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>4.2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Reactive uptake coefficient of the hydroxy radical, $\gamma _{{\protect\chem{OH}}}$}?><title>Reactive uptake coefficient of the hydroxy radical, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <?pagebreak page2002?><p id="d1e8434">The derived values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the full range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(cloud) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(aerosol) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are in good agreement with the average value suggested for pure water surfaces (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.035) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.47"/>.
It should be noted that this latter experimental value was derived assuming a Henry's law constant of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and [OH] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. If it were adjusted to atmospherically more relevant conditions ([OH] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as used in our study (Table S4), the resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might be smaller by more than an  order of magnitude than the reported one. Molecular dynamics simulations for the mass accommodation of OH on water surfaces showed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1, which can be considered the upper limit of reactive OH uptake onto water surfaces <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.48"/>.
The difference between such a value for pure water and the values from our model study demonstrates the high reactivity of the OH radical in the aqueous phase.
As its solubility is limited, this high reactivity results in subsaturated conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b).
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values show little difference at different pH values and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the reactive uptake of OH into cloud droplets could be parameterized with a value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for all conditions explored here. Similar to the findings for cloud water, the uptake of the OH radical could be parameterized by a single <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value for the conditions applied here (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0038). The comparison of the values in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a and c to those in Fig. S8a and c reveals that the gas-phase diffusion leads to a significant decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 in clouds and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in aerosol particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e8892">Several previous studies have determined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on surfaces other than pure water that are more comparable to atmospheric aerosol particles.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.49"/> showed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases on acidic solutions from 0.07 (28 % H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) to unity on 96 % H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
On organic surfaces, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are generally higher than on inorganic surfaces which demonstrates the high reactivity of OH with organics in the condensed phase and/or on organic surfaces. In several lab studies, squalane was used as a proxy for long-chain alkanes; the reactive uptake coefficients have been determined in a range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx43" id="altparen.50"/>). A similar value range was also found for a wide variety of other organics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.51"/>. In other experimental studies on organic particles, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.64 on wet succinic acid, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="altparen.52"/>; 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 on bis(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="altparen.53"/>).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on organic aerosols may decrease with increasing OH gas-phase concentration because the viscosity of the organic condensed phase prevents efficient uptake and diffusion of OH towards the particle center <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.54"/>.
Such effects were included in recently developed frameworks to parameterize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of particle viscosity, size and gas-phase OH concentration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.55"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e9082">We did not explore any of these parameters in detail in our current model study.
However, the comparison of the tight range of our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, independently of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and cloud or aerosol aqueous conditions, to the wide ranges of literature values leads us to the following conclusions:
(i) the similarity of our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value based on an explicit chemical mechanism  to that measured on pure water suggests that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> may be a good approximation under cloud conditions.
(ii) The fact that we cannot reproduce the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as observed on organic aerosols suggests that organic reactions control the reactive uptake of OH, which are not included in our explicit chemistry scheme.
(iii) Since organics are likely present in all aerosol particles, the effect of the iron distribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be overestimated by our chemical mechanism on ambient aerosol particles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>4.2.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Reactive uptake coefficient of the hydroxy peroxyl radical, $\gamma _{{\protect\chem{HO_{2}}}}$}?><title>Reactive uptake coefficient of the hydroxy peroxyl radical, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e9238">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values into cloud water are in the range of 0.001–0.004, with higher values at the highest pH (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b). In aerosol water, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a strong dependence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to an overestimate of the reactive uptake by FeBulk by up to 2 orders of magnitude at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>d). Note that at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %. no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is shown as under such conditions, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is predicted to evaporate.
This evaporation is due to the inefficient chemical HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption in iron-free particles, whereas efficient uptake occurs into the iron-containing particles.
This leads to a great imbalance of the phase transfer rates from and into the two droplet classes as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b.
We use identical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for droplet and aqueous particle surfaces. The mass accommodation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the upper limit of the maximum value for the uptake coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This limit can be seen in Fig. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>d), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approaches the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05, i.e., the regime in which the uptake is fully controlled by the mass accommodation and not by the chemical loss in the aqueous phase. For the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical, gas-phase diffusion may decrease <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, whereas the two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are nearly identical at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 (Fig. S8b). In aerosol water, gas-phase diffusion has an insignificant impact on its reactive uptake coefficient onto aerosol water (Fig. S8d).</p>
      <p id="d1e9472">It has been shown in global model studies that the reactive loss of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on aerosol surfaces can significantly impact the atmospheric oxidant budget (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.56"/>).
A value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 based on the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.57"/> has been commonly used in global models, which has also been supported by molecular dynamics simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.58"/>. However, recent model studies suggest that this value may be an overestimate and that values on the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 or 0.08 may be more appropriate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.59"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e9541">On dry aerosol surfaces, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is usually low: for example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.60"/> measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.075 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.015 on dry soot surfaces, which is comparable to the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.031 on dust <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.61"/> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> on dry NaCl <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.62"/>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases by more than 1 order of magnitude when RH increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.63"/>.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.64"/> showed much higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values on two humic acids (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0007</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.043</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) than on pure long-chain carboxylic acids (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). They ascribed the higher HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake to the small concentrations of copper and iron ions in the humic acids, in agreement with previous studies that showed the large impact of TMIs on HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reactive uptake (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx50" id="altparen.65"/>).
It was suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.66"/> that the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake cannot be solely controlled by the TMI concentration as they did not see any correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This lack of trend is similar to findings by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.67"/>, who also did not find any clear relationship in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on Cu-doped NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particles with Cu concentration.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2003?><p id="d1e9867">Based on our model results, the lack of such correlation can be qualitatively understood by simultaneous increase of the main chemical HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source and sink rates (Reactions S1 and L4–L6 in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>f).
The absence of a dependence of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on wet particle diameter in the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.68"/> is also in agreement with our sensitivity studies in which we varied the particle diameter by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 (Fig. S9).
This implies that the interfacial mass transfer is not a limiting step in the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake.
The HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on Cu-doped ammonium sulfate particles was observed to be higher under neutral (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2) as opposed to acidic conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.69"/>.
Similar results were observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.70"/> who generally found somewhat higher values than in our study (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and highest values for the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (i.e., highest iron concentration at a constant copper concentration) and highest pH.
However, overall their differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cu</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and/or pH are smaller than those that we predict for different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M809" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3). This suggests that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterizations that take into account the dependence on Cu concentration, total aerosol mass and particle size (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="altparen.71"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="altparen.72"/>) should be further refined to also include the iron distribution.</p>
      <p id="d1e10132">We note that our results are not quantitatively comparable to those on Cu-doped particles, as our chemical scheme includes only reactions of iron as the only TMI. The corresponding reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cu</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generally have higher rate constants than those of iron reactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.73"/>; however, as copper concentrations in ambient aerosols are usually lower than iron concentrations, the effect of both TMIs might be similar.
We did not perform the equivalent simulations for copper in the present study as to our knowledge, there are no data available that give single-particle information on the distribution of iron and copper within droplet or particle populations.
However, if iron and copper originated from different emission sources, the number concentration of TMI-containing particles might be relatively high.
However, in such situations the synergistic effects of Fe and Cu affecting HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cycling and uptake as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.74"/> might be reduced.</p>
      <p id="d1e10168">Measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on ambient aerosol populations showed ranges of 0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.34 (Mt. Tai) and 0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 (Mt. Mang) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.75"/>.
No systematic trend with total iron concentration that exceeded 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M819" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at Mt. Mang and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at Mt. Tai was observed.
The acidity of the aerosols was not reported in that study; however, the derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values did not show any significant trend with the molar NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ratios that ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3, pointing to moderately acidic to fully neutralized aerosol.
The fact that the ambient data do not show any trend with acidity might either point to a high number fraction of TMI-containing particles and/or to a relatively high pH, i.e., to conditions under which our model results do not show a large effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>d).
Two studies of ambient aerosol at urban locations revealed similar average values as compared to the mountain sites, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22 in Yokohama, Japan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.76"/>, and 0.24 (0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.36) in Kyoto, Japan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.77"/>.
No significant trend in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values was observed as a function of aerosol or air mass characteristics (coastal or mainland).</p>
      <p id="d1e10451">Given the large ranges of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values on lab-generated and ambient aerosol, it is difficult to reconcile differences between lab data and observations with our model results. However, our results might provide an explanation for the discrepancies of lab-derived or theoretical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the range of 0.2–1 to those determined on ambient aerosol (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We cannot say for sure that these differences indeed stem from different assumptions of iron distribution or other factors affecting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, our strong predicted decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at low pH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests that applying lab-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on aerosol particles with identical composition might lead to an overestimate of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss on atmospheric aerosol surfaces, even if all other aerosol properties (size, total iron mass, pH, etc.) are identical.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>ROS budgets and oxidative potential (OP)</title>
      <p id="d1e10574">The formation and cycling of ROS in the aqueous phase are tightly linked to adverse health effects of particulate matter that are caused by oxidative stress in the respiratory tract and lungs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.78"/>.
In addition, the oxidant content of ambient aerosol particles controls their aging timescales and interactions with the biosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.79"/>.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.80"/> found a positive trend of reactive species concentrations with total particle mass and increased OH concentrations as a function of transition metal content and the opposite trend for organic radicals at remote forest and polluted urban locations. Contrarily, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="text.81"/> did not find any correlation of the ROS formation potential with metal concentrations.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx28" id="text.82"/> suggested that sulfate may trigger metal solubility in highly acidic supermicron particles, which in turn leads to enhanced ROS formation.
On a molar basis, quinones and TMIs may be equally efficient in producing ROS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.83"/>; however, as TMI concentrations are higher than those of quinones in aerosol water, TMIs are considered major drivers for ROS levels.
In the overview study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.84"/> ROS activity was compared at different locations: at nearly all locations, the highest activity was observed in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (as opposed to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) samples; this trend was explained with the higher fractions and solubilities of iron in particles of these sizes.</p>
      <p id="d1e10617">Based on such studies, the oxidative potential of atmospheric particulate matter has been related to the presence and number of TMIs in aerosol particles.
Our model studies suggest that the total iron amount within an aerosol population may not be a sufficient parameter to constrain the<?pagebreak page2004?> oxidant concentrations within particulate matter in the atmosphere. However, the resulting health impacts of inhaled particles will likely not be largely affected by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> since upon inhalation, iron will likely dissolve in the lung fluid so that the particle-resolved effects of the iron distribution are diminished. While it may be possible that there are concentration gradients within the lung fluid due to dissolution and/or mixing kinetics, such effects cannot be quantified to date.</p>
      <p id="d1e10636">Generally all conclusions for oxidant budgets in aerosol water also apply to those in cloud water.
However, the largest concentration differences for extreme values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M849" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are less than an order of magnitude (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>).
Several model studies have explored the sources and production rates of OH in cloud water using chemical mechanisms of different complexities (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx9" id="altparen.85"/>). Our analysis shows that the chemical source and loss rates might be underestimated in bulk cloud water. While the overall oxidant content of the cloud water might not be significantly affected (“bulk aqueous-phase concentrations” in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), the large differences of OH concentrations of about an order of magnitude in iron-containing and iron-free droplets may lead to very different oxidation rates of organics.
Higher OH concentrations in the aqueous phase may also lead to more efficient formation of organics acids (aqSOA; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx26" id="altparen.86"/>). Generally, the highest OH concentrations in cloud water are predicted under clean (marine, remote) conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.87"/>.
Our results suggest that the difference in OH concentrations might be even greater between low and high pH as we find the largest impact by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for high pH. Even though in clean air masses, total iron concentrations might be lower, such trends might be robust as we do not find a strong dependence of the predicted OH concentrations on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Given the close connections of OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, any conclusions for the OH concentrations in cloud water can be similarly drawn also for HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M857" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, the less reactive and more soluble H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M859" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is not affected by the iron distribution.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e10784">The role of transition metal ion (TMI) reactions for impacting oxidant levels (OH, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M860" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M862" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the atmospheric aqueous phase has been recognized for a long time. However, in atmospheric multiphase chemistry models, it usually assumed that all aerosol particles and droplets contain TMIs, and thus TMI-catalyzed reactions occur in all droplets.
Single-particle analyses have shown that only a small number fraction of particles contain iron, which implies the same for cloud droplets that are formed on such particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e10814">Using a box model with a well-established chemical multiphase mechanism, we explored the importance of iron distribution across (i) aqueous aerosol particle or (ii) cloud droplet populations. We performed box model studies in which a constant iron concentration (10 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M863" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; in sensitivity studies also 50 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is distributed to a number fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M865" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of aerosol particles or droplets from 1 % to 100 % (“FeN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100” and “FeBulk” approaches, respectively).</p>
      <p id="d1e10864">We find that H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M868" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in cloud water are not affected by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M869" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Its main source and loss processes include the recombination of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M870" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the reaction with S(IV), respectively. Since the loss process is slower than the uptake from the gas phase and the production in the aqueous phase,  H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M871" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M872" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is in thermodynamic equilibrium between the gas phase and all droplets.
The same conclusions are drawn for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M874" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> partitioning into aerosol water if the same Henry's law constant is applied (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M875" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M876" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M877" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M878" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M879" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
However, since H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M881" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has been found to partition more efficiently into aerosol water than into pure water, applying a higher effective Henry's law constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M882" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M883" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M884" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M885" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) results in an overestimate of the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M887" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M888" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. These differences are largest at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M889" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, whereas the differences are negligible at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M890" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 or 4.5. The opposite trends are found for the OH radical, whose aqueous-phase concentration in cloud water might be overestimated by up to a factor of 5 using the FeBulk approach at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M891" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, whereas there might be an over- or underestimate by nearly an order of magnitude in aerosol water, depending on the choice of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e11153">The concentrations of OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M893" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals are closely linked. Generally we find that the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M894" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M895" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the aqueous phase are underestimated by the FeBulk approach, again with the largest discrepancies at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M898" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M899" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 % or 100 %.
This trend can be explained by the increase of the effective Henry's law constant of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M900" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at high pH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M901" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M902" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M903" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M904" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M905" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the higher rate constants of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M906" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical anion as compared to the corresponding reactions of the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M907" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical.
The higher partitioning together with the quicker consumption of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M908" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M909" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M910" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at high pH leads to its subsaturation in the aqueous phase at high pH.
This effect is strongest at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M911" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because the few iron-containing droplets (particles) are highly concentrated in iron.
The reaction of Fe(III) ions or hydroxy complexes with HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M912" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M913" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M914" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the main sink of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M915" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M916" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M917" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both the cloud and aerosol aqueous phases. At the same time it is also the main reduction pathway of Fe(III) to Fe(II). Since the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M918" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M919" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M920" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in iron-containing droplets is up to 1 order of magnitude lower in the FeBulk approach, the Fe(III) reduction is less efficient.
Our results are largely independent of the total iron mass concentration as both the chemical HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M921" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M922" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M923" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources and sinks are dependent on iron.
Based on these results, we conclude that the Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M924" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) ratio in cloud and aerosol water might be lower than implied by bulk samples.
This finding has implications for the interpretation of modeled and measured Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M925" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(total) (or Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M926" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(III)) ratios that are often considered a measure of iron solubility and bioavailability.
Our study demonstrates that multiphase chemistry models might not be able to properly predict OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M927" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the aqueous phase of cloud or aqueous particles, which might translate<?pagebreak page2005?> into biases in the predicted oxidation rates (e.g., aqSOA formation).
While not explored in detail in the current study, further implications of iron distribution in cloud droplets might include differences in sulfate formation rates by metal-catalyzed processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e11503">The reactive uptake of OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M928" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is often parameterized by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M929" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
We derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M930" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values into cloud and aerosol water from our model studies. The values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M931" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are not largely affected by the iron distribution and show values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M932" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0023</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for clouds and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M933" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.038 for aerosol water. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M934" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(aerosol) can be significantly reduced at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M935" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as compared to bulk samples, showing difference of up to 2 orders of magnitude at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M936" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M937" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M938" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M939" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M940" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M941" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0001 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M942" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M943" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 %).
This analysis demonstrates that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M944" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values that are measured in lab studies using internally mixed aerosol particles might be too high as compared to those ambient aerosol populations.
In addition to another factors that affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M945" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on various aerosol surfaces (chemical composition, particle size, water content, etc.), our results suggest that the iron distribution across particle populations can also add to the large variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M946" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and to the mismatch of observed and modeled HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M947" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss if lab-derived data are used.
Similar considerations can also be applied to the interpretation of ROS formation and oxidative potential of aerosol particles.
As ambient aerosol particles likely comprise external mixtures in terms of iron, neither results based on bulk sampling nor on modeling will correctly represent the oxidant budgets in ambient particulate matter.</p>
      <p id="d1e11743">Our study is to the best of our knowledge the first explicit chemical multiphase model study that systematically explores the role of iron distribution across individual aqueous aerosol particles or cloud droplets for the concentrations and uptake rates of reactive oxygen species.
There are only few data available on the iron distribution in aerosol populations from single-particle analyses that may be used to constrain the number fraction of iron-containing particles and droplets.
While we restricted our model studies to iron, similar conclusions may also be drawn for other transition metal ions, such as copper or manganese.
We identified various potential implications of this parameter for, e.g., (i) oxidant budgets and particle mass formation (aqSOA, sulfate) in clouds and aerosols, (ii) reactive radical (OH, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M948" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) uptake onto aerosols, and (iii) oxidative potentials of aerosol particles, which should be further explored by experimental and model studies.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e11759">The model output is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5829360" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5829360</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.88"/>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e11768">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1989-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1989-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e11777">BE designed and led the study. AK performed the model studies. AK and BE wrote the manuscript. MZ contributed to the discussion of the results.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e11783">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e11792">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e11798">We thank Daniel Murphy (NOAA/ESRL) for useful discussions and for sharing data of single-particle measurements. We area also grateful to the two anonymous referees, whose comments have helped to improve the paper.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e11803">This research has been supported by  the French National Research Agency (ANR) (grant no. ANR-17-MPGA-0013).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e11809">This paper was edited by John Liggio and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Al-Abadleh(2015)}}?><label>Al-Abadleh(2015)</label><?label Al-Abadleh2015?><mixed-citation>Al-Abadleh, H. A.: Review of the bulk and surface chemistry of iron in
atmospherically relevant systems containing humic-like substances, RSC
Adv., 5, 45785–45811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA03132J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5RA03132J</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Alexander et~al.(2009)Alexander, Park, Jacob, and
Gong}}?><label>Alexander et al.(2009)Alexander, Park, Jacob, and
Gong</label><?label Alexander2009?><mixed-citation>Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., and Gong, S.: Transition
metal-catalyzed oxidation of atmospheric sulfur: Global implications for the
sulfur budget, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D02309,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010486" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd010486</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Arangio et~al.(2015)Arangio, Slade, Berkemeier, P{\"{o}}schl, Knopf,
and Shiraiwa}}?><label>Arangio et al.(2015)Arangio, Slade, Berkemeier, Pöschl, Knopf,
and Shiraiwa</label><?label Arangio2015?><mixed-citation>Arangio, A. M., Slade, J. H., Berkemeier, T., Pöschl, U., Knopf, D. A.,
and Shiraiwa, M.: Multiphase Chemical Kinetics of OH Radical Uptake by
Molecular Organic Markers of Biomass Burning Aerosols: Humidity and
Temperature Dependence, Surface Reaction, and Bulk Diffusion, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 119, 4533–4544, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp510489z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp510489z</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Arangio et~al.(2016)Arangio, Tong, Socorro, P{\"{o}}schl, and
Shiraiwa}}?><label>Arangio et al.(2016)Arangio, Tong, Socorro, Pöschl, and
Shiraiwa</label><?label Arangio2016?><mixed-citation>Arangio, A. M., Tong, H., Socorro, J., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.:
Quantification of environmentally persistent free radicals and reactive
oxygen species in atmospheric aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
13105–13119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13105-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13105-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Barth et~al.(2021)Barth, Ervens, Herrmann, Tilgner, McNeill, Tsui,
Deguillaume, Chaumerliac, Carlton, and Lance}}?><label>Barth et al.(2021)Barth, Ervens, Herrmann, Tilgner, McNeill, Tsui,
Deguillaume, Chaumerliac, Carlton, and Lance</label><?label Barth?><mixed-citation>Barth, M. C., Ervens, B., Herrmann, H., Tilgner, A., McNeill, V. F., Tsui,
W. G., Deguillaume, L., Chaumerliac, N., Carlton, A. G., and Lance, S.: Box
Model Intercomparison of Cloud Chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD035486, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035486" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JD035486</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2006?><ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bedjanian et~al.(2005)Bedjanian, Leli{\`{e}}vre, and {Le
Bras}}}?><label>Bedjanian et al.(2005)Bedjanian, Lelièvre, and Le
Bras</label><?label Bedjanian2005?><mixed-citation>Bedjanian, Y., Lelièvre, S., and Le Bras, G.: Experimental study of
the interaction of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M949" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals with soot surface, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
7, 334–341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B414217A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B414217A</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bertram et~al.(2001)Bertram, Ivanov, Hunter, Molina, and
Molina}}?><label>Bertram et al.(2001)Bertram, Ivanov, Hunter, Molina, and
Molina</label><?label Bertram2001?><mixed-citation>Bertram, A. K., Ivanov, A. V., Hunter, M., Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.:
The reaction probability of OH on Organic Surfaces of Tropospheric
Interest,  J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 9415–9421,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0114034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp0114034</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bianchini et~al.(2018)Bianchini, Tesa-Serrate, Costen, and
McKendrick}}?><label>Bianchini et al.(2018)Bianchini, Tesa-Serrate, Costen, and
McKendrick</label><?label Bianchini2018?><mixed-citation>Bianchini, R. H., Tesa-Serrate, M. A., Costen, M. L., and McKendrick, K. G.:
Collision-Energy Dependence of the Uptake of Hydroxyl Radicals at
Atmospherically Relevant Liquid Surfaces,   J. Phys. Chem.
C, 122, 6648–6660, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12574" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12574</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bianco et~al.(2015)Bianco, Passananti, Perroux, Voyard,
Mouchel-Vallon, Chaumerliac, Mailhot, Deguillaume, and Brigante}}?><label>Bianco et al.(2015)Bianco, Passananti, Perroux, Voyard,
Mouchel-Vallon, Chaumerliac, Mailhot, Deguillaume, and Brigante</label><?label Bianco2015?><mixed-citation>Bianco, A., Passananti, M., Perroux, H., Voyard, G., Mouchel-Vallon, C.,
Chaumerliac, N., Mailhot, G., Deguillaume, L., and Brigante, M.: A better
understanding of hydroxyl radical photochemical sources in cloud waters
collected at the puy de Dôme station – experimental versus modelled
formation rates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9191–9202,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9191-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-9191-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Chan et~al.(2014)Chan, Zhang, Goldstein, and Wilson}}?><label>Chan et al.(2014)Chan, Zhang, Goldstein, and Wilson</label><?label Chan2014?><mixed-citation>Chan, M. N., Zhang, H., Goldstein, A. H., and Wilson, K. R.: Role of Water and
Phase in the Heterogeneous Oxidation of Solid and Aqueous Succinic Acid
Aerosol by Hydroxyl Radicals,  J. Phys. Chem. C, 118,
28978–28992, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5012022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp5012022</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Chang et~al.(1987)Chang, Brost, Isaksen, Madronich, Middleton,
Stockwell, and Walcek}}?><label>Chang et al.(1987)Chang, Brost, Isaksen, Madronich, Middleton,
Stockwell, and Walcek</label><?label Chang1987?><mixed-citation>Chang, J. S., Brost, R. A., Isaksen, I. S. A., Madronich, S., Middleton, P.,
Stockwell, W. R., and Walcek, C. J.: A three-dimensional Eulerian acid
deposition model: Physical concepts and formulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 92, 14681–14700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD12p14681" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD092iD12p14681</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Charrier and Anastasio(2012)}}?><label>Charrier and Anastasio(2012)</label><?label Charrier2012?><mixed-citation>Charrier, J. G. and Anastasio, C.: On dithiothreitol (DTT) as a measure of
oxidative potential for ambient particles: evidence for the importance of
soluble transition metals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
9321–9333, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9321-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9321-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Charrier et~al.(2015)Charrier, Richards-Henderson, Bein, McFall,
Wexler, and Anastasio}}?><label>Charrier et al.(2015)Charrier, Richards-Henderson, Bein, McFall,
Wexler, and Anastasio</label><?label Charrier2015?><mixed-citation>Charrier, J. G., Richards-Henderson, N. K., Bein, K. J., McFall, A. S., Wexler, A. S., and Anastasio, C.: Oxidant production from source-oriented particulate matter – Part 1: Oxidative potential using the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2327–2340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2327-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2327-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Che et~al.(2009)Che, Smith, Leone, Ahmed, and Wilson}}?><label>Che et al.(2009)Che, Smith, Leone, Ahmed, and Wilson</label><?label Che2009?><mixed-citation>Che, D. L., Smith, J. D., Leone, S. R., Ahmed, M., and Wilson, K. R.:
Quantifying the reactive uptake of OH by organic aerosols in a continuous
flow stirred tank reactor, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 7885–7895,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B904418C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B904418C</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cho{\"{e}}l et~al.(2007)Cho{\"{e}}l, Deboudt, Flament, Aimoz, and
M{\'{e}}riaux}}?><label>Choël et al.(2007)Choël, Deboudt, Flament, Aimoz, and
Mériaux</label><?label Choel2007?><mixed-citation>Choël, M., Deboudt, K., Flament, P., Aimoz, L., and Mériaux, X.:
Single-particle analysis of atmospheric aerosols at Cape Gris-Nez, English
Channel: Influence of steel works on iron apportionment, Atmos.
Environ., 41, 2820–2830, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.038</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Christian et~al.(2017)Christian, Brune, and Mao}}?><label>Christian et al.(2017)Christian, Brune, and Mao</label><?label Christian2017?><mixed-citation>Christian, K. E., Brune, W. H., and Mao, J.: Global sensitivity analysis of
the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model: ozone and hydrogen oxides during
ARCTAS (2008), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3769–3784,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3769-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-3769-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cini et~al.(2002)Cini, Prodi, Santachiara, Porcu, Bellandi, Stortini,
Oppo, Udisti, and Pantani}}?><label>Cini et al.(2002)Cini, Prodi, Santachiara, Porcu, Bellandi, Stortini,
Oppo, Udisti, and Pantani</label><?label Cini2002?><mixed-citation>Cini, R., Prodi, F., Santachiara, G., Porcu, F., Bellandi, S., Stortini, A.,
Oppo, C., Udisti, R., and Pantani, F.: Chemical characterization of cloud
episodes at a ridge site in Tuscan Appennines, Italy, Atmos. Res.,
61, 311–334, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00139-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00139-9</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cooper and Abbatt(1996)}}?><label>Cooper and Abbatt(1996)</label><?label Cooper1996?><mixed-citation>Cooper, P. L. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Heterogeneous Interactions of OH and
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M950" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Radicals with Surfaces Characteristic of Atmospheric
Particulate Matter,   J. Phys. Chem., 100, 2249–2254,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp952142z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp952142z</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Deguillaume et~al.(2004)Deguillaume, Leriche, Monod, and
Chaumerliac}}?><label>Deguillaume et al.(2004)Deguillaume, Leriche, Monod, and
Chaumerliac</label><?label Deguillaume2004?><mixed-citation>Deguillaume, L., Leriche, M., Monod, A., and Chaumerliac, N.: The role of
transition metal ions on
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M951" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals in
clouds: a numerical evaluation of its impact on multiphase chemistry, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 4, 95–110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-95-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-95-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Deguillaume et~al.(2005)Deguillaume, Leriche, Desboeufs, Mailhot,
George, and Chaumerliac}}?><label>Deguillaume et al.(2005)Deguillaume, Leriche, Desboeufs, Mailhot,
George, and Chaumerliac</label><?label Deguillaume2005?><mixed-citation>Deguillaume, L., Leriche, M., Desboeufs, K., Mailhot, G., George, C., and
Chaumerliac, N.: Transition metals in atmospheric liquid particles: Sources,
reactivity and sensitive parameters, Chem. Rev., 105, 3388–3431,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr040649c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr040649c</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ervens(2015)}}?><label>Ervens(2015)</label><?label Ervens2015?><mixed-citation>Ervens, B.: Modeling the Processing of Aerosol and Trace Gases in Clouds and
Fogs, Chem. Rev., 115, 4157–4198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5005887</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Ervens(2022)}?><label>Ervens(2022)</label><?label Ervens2022?><mixed-citation>Ervens, B.: Model output, Khaled et al., Iron distribution in the aqueous phase, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5829360" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5829360</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ervens et~al.(2003)Ervens, George, Williams, Buxton, Salmon, Bydder,
Wilkinson, Dentener, Mirabel, Wolke, and Herrmann}}?><label>Ervens et al.(2003)Ervens, George, Williams, Buxton, Salmon, Bydder,
Wilkinson, Dentener, Mirabel, Wolke, and Herrmann</label><?label Ervens2003?><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., George, C., Williams, J. E., Buxton, G. V., Salmon, G. A., Bydder,
M., Wilkinson, F., Dentener, F., Mirabel, P., Wolke, R., and Herrmann, H.:
CAPRAM2.4 (MODAC mechanism): An extended and condensed tropospheric aqueous
phase mechanism and its application, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4426, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002202" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002202</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ervens et~al.(2008)Ervens, Carlton, Turpin, Altieri, Kreidenweis, and
Feingold}}?><label>Ervens et al.(2008)Ervens, Carlton, Turpin, Altieri, Kreidenweis, and
Feingold</label><?label Ervens2008?><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Altieri, K. E., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
and Feingold, G.: Secondary organic aerosol yields from cloud-processing of
isoprene oxidation products, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L02816,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl031828</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ervens et~al.(2011)Ervens, Turpin, and Weber}}?><label>Ervens et al.(2011)Ervens, Turpin, and Weber</label><?label Ervens2011?><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ervens et~al.(2014)Ervens, Sorooshian, Lim, and Turpin}}?><label>Ervens et al.(2014)Ervens, Sorooshian, Lim, and Turpin</label><?label Ervens2014?><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Sorooshian, A., Lim, Y. B., and Turpin, B. J.: Key parameters
controlling OH-initiated formation of secondary organic aerosol in the
aqueous phase (aqSOA), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 3997–4016,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD021021</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fang et~al.(2016)Fang, Verma, Bates, Abrams, Klein, Strickland,
Sarnat, Chang, Mulholland, Tolbert, Russell, and Weber}}?><label>Fang et al.(2016)Fang, Verma, Bates, Abrams, Klein, Strickland,
Sarnat, Chang, Mulholland, Tolbert, Russell, and Weber</label><?label Fang2016?><mixed-citation>Fang, T., Verma, V., Bates, J. T., Abrams, J., Klein, M., Strickland, M. J., Sarnat, S. E., Chang, H. H., Mulholland, J. A., Tolbert, P. E., Russell, A. G., and Weber, R. J.: Oxidative potential of ambient water-soluble PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M952" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the southeastern United States: contrasts in sources and health associations between ascorbic acid (AA) and dithiothreitol (DTT) assays, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3865–3879, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3865-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3865-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fang et~al.(2017)Fang, Guo, Zeng, Verma, Nenes, and Weber}}?><label>Fang et al.(2017)Fang, Guo, Zeng, Verma, Nenes, and Weber</label><?label Fang2017?><mixed-citation>Fang, T., Guo, H., Zeng, L., Verma, V., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Highly
Acidic Ambient Particles, Soluble Metals, and Oxidative Potential: A Link
between Sulfate and Aerosol Toxicity, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
51, 2611–2620, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06151" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b06151</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fomba et~al.(2015)Fomba, van Pinxteren, M{\"{u}}ller, Iinuma, Lee,
{Collett Jr.}, and Herrmann}}?><label>Fomba et al.(2015)Fomba, van Pinxteren, Müller, Iinuma, Lee,
Collett Jr., and Herrmann</label><?label Fomba2015?><mixed-citation>Fomba, K. W., van Pinxteren, D., Müller, K., Iinuma, Y., Lee, T.,
Collett Jr., J. L., and Herrmann, H.: Trace metal characterization of
aerosol particles and cloud water during HCCT 2010, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 8751–8765, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8751-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8751-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Furutani et~al.(2011)Furutani, Jung, Miura, Takami, Kato, Kajii, and
Uematsu}}?><label>Furutani et al.(2011)Furutani, Jung, Miura, Takami, Kato, Kajii, and
Uematsu</label><?label Furutani2011?><mixed-citation>Furutani, H., Jung, J., Miura, K., Takami, A., Kato, S., Kajii, Y., and
Uematsu, M.: Single-particle chemical characterization and source
apportionment of iron-containing atmospheric aerosols in Asian outflow, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D18204,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015867" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011jd015867</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{George et~al.(2007)George, Vlasenko, Slowik, Broekhuizen, and
Abbatt}}?><label>George et al.(2007)George, Vlasenko, Slowik, Broekhuizen, and
Abbatt</label><?label George2007?><mixed-citation>George, I. J., Vlasenko, A., Sl<?pagebreak page2007?>owik, J. G., Broekhuizen, K., and Abbatt, J.
P. D.: Heterogeneous oxidation of saturated organic aerosols by hydroxyl
radicals: uptake kinetics, condensed-phase products, and particle size
change, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4187–4201,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4187-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4187-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Guo et~al.(2019)Guo, Wang, {Tao Wang}, and Zhang}}?><label>Guo et al.(2019)Guo, Wang, Tao Wang, and Zhang</label><?label Guo2019?><mixed-citation>Guo, J., Wang, Z.,  Wang, T., and Zhang, X.: Theoretical evaluation of
different factors affecting the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M953" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake coefficient driven by
aqueous-phase first-order loss reaction, Sci. Total Environ.,
683, 146–153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.237" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.237</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Haggerstone et~al.(2005)Haggerstone, Carpenter, N., and
McFiggans}}?><label>Haggerstone et al.(2005)Haggerstone, Carpenter, N., and
McFiggans</label><?label Haggerstone2005?><mixed-citation>Haggerstone, A.-L., Carpenter, L. J., N., C., and McFiggans, G.: Improved
model predictions of
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M954" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with gas to
particle mass transfer rates calculated using aerosol number size
distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 110, , D04303,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005282" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005282</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hanson et~al.(1992)Hanson, Burkholder, Howard, and
Ravishankara}}?><label>Hanson et al.(1992)Hanson, Burkholder, Howard, and
Ravishankara</label><?label Hanson1992?><mixed-citation>Hanson, D. R., Burkholder, J. B., Howard, C. J., and Ravishankara, A. R.:
Measurement of hydroxyl and hydroperoxy radical uptake coefficients on water
and sulfuric acid surfaces, J. Phys. Chem., 96, 4979–4985,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100191a046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/j100191a046</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hasson and Paulson(2003)}}?><label>Hasson and Paulson(2003)</label><?label Hasson2003?><mixed-citation>Hasson, A. S. and Paulson, S. E.: An investigation of the relationship between
gas-phase and aerosol borne hydroperoxides in urban air, J. Aerosol Sci.,
34, 459–468, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00002-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00002-8</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Herrmann et~al.(2000)Herrmann, Ervens, Jacobi, Wolke, Nowacki, and
Zellner}}?><label>Herrmann et al.(2000)Herrmann, Ervens, Jacobi, Wolke, Nowacki, and
Zellner</label><?label Herrmann2000?><mixed-citation>
Herrmann, H., Ervens, B., Jacobi, H.-W., Wolke, R., Nowacki, P., and Zellner,
R.: CAPRAM2.3: A Chemical Aqueous Phase Radical Mechanism for Tropospheric
Chemistry, J. Atmos. Chem., 36, 231–284,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Houle et~al.(2015)Houle, Hinsberg, and Wilson}}?><label>Houle et al.(2015)Houle, Hinsberg, and Wilson</label><?label Houle2015?><mixed-citation>Houle, F. A., Hinsberg, W. D., and Wilson, K. R.: Oxidation of a model alkane
aerosol by OH radical: the emergent nature of reactive uptake, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 17, 4412–4423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP05093B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C4CP05093B</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ingall et~al.(2018)Ingall, Feng, Longo, Lai, Shelley, Landing,
Morton, Nenes, Mihalopoulos, Violaki, Gao, Sahai, and Castorina}}?><label>Ingall et al.(2018)Ingall, Feng, Longo, Lai, Shelley, Landing,
Morton, Nenes, Mihalopoulos, Violaki, Gao, Sahai, and Castorina</label><?label Ingall2018?><mixed-citation>Ingall, E. D., Feng, Y., Longo, A. F., Lai, B., Shelley, R. U., Landing, W. M.,
Morton, P. L., Nenes, A., Mihalopoulos, N., Violaki, K., Gao, Y., Sahai, S.,
and Castorina, E.: Enhanced Iron Solubility at Low pH in Global Aerosols, Atmosphere, 9, 201,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9050201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos9050201</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jacob(2000)}}?><label>Jacob(2000)</label><?label Jacob2000?><mixed-citation>Jacob, D. J.: Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Environ.,
34, 2131–2159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00462-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00462-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Khaled et~al.(2021)Khaled, Zhang, Amato, Delort, and
Ervens}}?><label>Khaled et al.(2021)Khaled, Zhang, Amato, Delort, and
Ervens</label><?label Khaled2021?><mixed-citation>Khaled, A., Zhang, M., Amato, P., Delort, A.-M., and Ervens, B.:
Biodegradation by bacteria in clouds: an underestimated sink for some
organics in the atmospheric multiphase system, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 21, 3123–3141, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3123-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-3123-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lakey et~al.(2015)Lakey, George, Whalley, Baeza-Romero, and
Heard}}?><label>Lakey et al.(2015)Lakey, George, Whalley, Baeza-Romero, and
Heard</label><?label Lakey2015?><mixed-citation>Lakey, P. S. J., George, I. J., Whalley, L. K., Baeza-Romero, M. T., and Heard,
D. E.: Measurements of the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M955" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Uptake Coefficients onto Single Component
Organic Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 4878–4885,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b00948</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lakey et~al.(2016)Lakey, Berkemeier, Krapf, Dommen, Steimer, Whalley,
Ingham, Baeza-Romero, P{\"{o}}schl, Shiraiwa, Ammann, and Heard}}?><label>Lakey et al.(2016)Lakey, Berkemeier, Krapf, Dommen, Steimer, Whalley,
Ingham, Baeza-Romero, Pöschl, Shiraiwa, Ammann, and Heard</label><?label Lakey2016?><mixed-citation>Lakey, P. S. J., Berkemeier, T., Krapf, M., Dommen, J., Steimer, S. S.,
Whalley, L. K., Ingham, T., Baeza-Romero, M. T., Pöschl, U., Shiraiwa,
M., Ammann, M., and Heard, D. E.: The effect of viscosity and diffusion on
the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M956" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by sucrose and secondary organic aerosol particles, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 13035–13047, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13035-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13035-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Li and Knopf(2021)}}?><label>Li and Knopf(2021)</label><?label Li2021?><mixed-citation>Li, J. and Knopf, D. A.: Representation of Multiphase OH Oxidation of
Amorphous Organic Aerosol for Tropospheric Conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 7266–7275,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07668" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c07668</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Li et~al.(2019)Li, Jacob, Liao, Shen, Zhang, and Bates}}?><label>Li et al.(2019)Li, Jacob, Liao, Shen, Zhang, and Bates</label><?label LiPNAS2019?><mixed-citation>Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Shen, L., Zhang, Q., and Bates, K. H.:
Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in
China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 422–427,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812168116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1812168116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Luo et~al.(2005)Luo, Mahowald, Meskhidze, Chen, Siefert, Baker, and
Johansen}}?><label>Luo et al.(2005)Luo, Mahowald, Meskhidze, Chen, Siefert, Baker, and
Johansen</label><?label Luo2005?><mixed-citation>Luo, C., Mahowald, N. M., Meskhidze, N., Chen, Y., Siefert, R. L., Baker,
A. R., and Johansen, A. M.: Estimation of iron solubility from observations
and a global aerosol model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
110, D23307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006059</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lyu et~al.(2018)Lyu, Guo, Cheng, and Li}}?><label>Lyu et al.(2018)Lyu, Guo, Cheng, and Li</label><?label Lyu2018?><mixed-citation>Lyu, Y., Guo, H., Cheng, T., and Li, X.: Particle Size Distributions of
Oxidative Potential of Lung-Deposited Particles: Assessing Contributions from
Quinones and Water-Soluble Metals, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 6592–6600, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06686" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b06686</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Macintyre and Evans(2011)}}?><label>Macintyre and Evans(2011)</label><?label Macintyre2011?><mixed-citation>Macintyre, H. L. and Evans, M. J.: Parameterisation and impact of aerosol
uptake of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M957" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on a global tropospheric model, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 10965–10974, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10965-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-10965-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Madronich and Calvert(1989)}}?><label>Madronich and Calvert(1989)</label><?label Madronich1989a?><mixed-citation>Madronich, S. and Calvert, J. G.: The NCAR Master Mechanism of the Gas Phase
Chemistry – Version 2.0, Tech. Rep., No. NCAR/TN-333<inline-formula><mml:math id="M958" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>STR, University
Corporation for Atmospheric Research,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6HD7SKH" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6HD7SKH</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mao et~al.(2013)Mao, Fan, Jacob, and Travis}}?><label>Mao et al.(2013)Mao, Fan, Jacob, and Travis</label><?label Mao2013?><mixed-citation>Mao, J., Fan, S., Jacob, D. J., and Travis, K. R.: Radical loss in the atmosphere from Cu-Fe redox coupling in aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 509–519, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-509-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-509-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mao et~al.(2017)Mao, Fan, and Horowitz}}?><label>Mao et al.(2017)Mao, Fan, and Horowitz</label><?label Mao2017?><mixed-citation>Mao, J., Fan, S., and Horowitz, L. W.: Soluble Fe in Aerosols Sustained by
Gaseous HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M959" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Uptake, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 4,
98–104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Matthews et~al.(2014)Matthews, Baeza-Romero, Whalley, and
Heard}}?><label>Matthews et al.(2014)Matthews, Baeza-Romero, Whalley, and
Heard</label><?label Matthews2014?><mixed-citation>Matthews, P. S. J., Baeza-Romero, M. T., Whalley, L. K., and Heard, D. E.:
Uptake of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M960" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals onto Arizona test dust particles
using an aerosol flow tube, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
7397–7408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7397-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7397-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Moffet et~al.(2012)Moffet, Furutani, R{\"{o}}del, Henn, Sprau,
Laskin, Uematsu, and Gilles}}?><label>Moffet et al.(2012)Moffet, Furutani, Rödel, Henn, Sprau,
Laskin, Uematsu, and Gilles</label><?label Moffet2012?><mixed-citation>Moffet, R. C., Furutani, H., Rödel, T. C., Henn, T. R., Sprau, P. O.,
Laskin, A., Uematsu, M., and Gilles, M. K.: Iron speciation and mixing in
single aerosol particles from the Asian continental outflow, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D07204,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016746" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016746</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Molina et~al.(2020)Molina, {Toro A.}, Manzano, Canepari, Massimi, and
Leiva-Guzm{\'{a}}n}}?><label>Molina et al.(2020)Molina, Toro A., Manzano, Canepari, Massimi, and
Leiva-Guzmán</label><?label Molina2020?><mixed-citation>Molina, C., Toro A., R., Manzano, C. A., Canepari, S., Massimi, L., and
Leiva-Guzmán, M. A.: Airborne Aerosols and Human Health: Leapfrogging
from Mass Concentration to Oxidative Potential, Atmosphere, 11, 917,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11090917" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos11090917</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Moon et~al.(2018)Moon, Taverna, Anduix-Canto, Ingham, Chipperfield,
Seakins, Baeza-Romero, and Heard}}?><label>Moon et al.(2018)Moon, Taverna, Anduix-Canto, Ingham, Chipperfield,
Seakins, Baeza-Romero, and Heard</label><?label Moon2018?><mixed-citation>Moon, D. R., Taverna, G. S., Anduix-Canto, C., Ingham, T., Chipperfield, M. P.,
Seakins, P. W., Baeza-Romero, M.-T., and Heard, D. E.: Heterogeneous
reaction of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M961" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with airborne TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M962" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
particles and its implication for climate change mitigation strategies,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 327–338,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-327-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-327-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Morita et~al.(2004)Morita, Kanaya, and Francisco}}?><label>Morita et al.(2004)Morita, Kanaya, and Francisco</label><?label Morita2004?><mixed-citation>Morita, A., Kanaya, Y., and Francisco, J. S.: Uptake of the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M963" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical by
water: Molecular dynamics calculations and their implications for atmospheric
modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D09201,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004240" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd004240</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mozurkewich et~al.(1987)Mozurkewich, H, Gupta, and
Calvert}}?><label>Mozurkewich et al.(1987)Mozurkewich, H, Gupta, and
Calvert</label><?label Mozurkewich1987?><mixed-citation>Mozurkewich, M., H, M. P., Gupta, A., and Calvert, J. G.: Mass Accommodation
Coefficient for HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M964" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Radicals on Aqueous Particles, J.
Geophys. Res., 92, 4163–4170, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Myriokefalitakis et~al.(2018)Myriokefalitakis, Ito, Kanakidou, Nenes,
Krol, Mahowald, Scanza, Hamilton, Johnson, Meskhidze, Kok, Guieu, Baker,
Jickells, Sarin, Bikkina, Shelley, Bowie, Perron, and
Duce}}?><label>Myriokefalitakis et al.(2018)Myriokefalitakis, Ito, Kanakidou, Nenes,
Krol, Mahowald, Scanza, Hamilton, Johnson, Meskhidze, Kok, Guieu, Baker,
Jickells, Sarin, Bikkina, Shelley, Bowie, Perron, and
Duce</label><?label Myriokefalitakis2018?><mixed-citation>Myriokefalitakis, S., Ito, A., Kanakidou, M., Nene<?pagebreak page2008?>s, A., Krol, M. C., Mahowald,
N. M., Scanza, R. A., Hamilton, D. S., Johnson, M. S., Meskhidze, N., Kok,
J. F., Guieu, C., Baker, A. R., Jickells, T. D., Sarin, M. M., Bikkina, S.,
Shelley, R., Bowie, A., Perron, M. M. G., and Duce, R. A.: Reviews and
syntheses: the GESAMP atmospheric iron deposition model intercomparison
study, Biogeosciences, 15, 6659–6684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6659-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-6659-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nathanson et~al.(1996)Nathanson, Davidovits, Worsnop, and
Kolb}}?><label>Nathanson et al.(1996)Nathanson, Davidovits, Worsnop, and
Kolb</label><?label Nathanson1996?><mixed-citation>Nathanson, G. M., Davidovits, P., Worsnop, D. R., and Kolb, C. E.: Dynamics
and Kinetics at the Gas-Liquid Interface, J. Phys. Chem., 100,
13007–13020, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp953548e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp953548e</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{P{\"{o}}schl and Shiraiwa(2015)}}?><label>Pöschl and Shiraiwa(2015)</label><?label Poschl2015?><mixed-citation>Pöschl, U. and Shiraiwa, M.: Multiphase Chemistry at the
Atmosphere–Biosphere Interface Influencing Climate and Public Health in the
Anthropocene, Chem. Rev., 115, 4440–4475, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500487s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr500487s</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{P{\"{o}}schl et~al.(2007)P{\"{o}}schl, Rudich, and
Ammann}}?><label>Pöschl et al.(2007)Pöschl, Rudich, and
Ammann</label><?label Poschl2007?><mixed-citation>Pöschl, U., Rudich, Y., and Ammann, M.: Kinetic model framework for
aerosol and cloud surface chemistry and gas-particle interactions &amp;ndash;
Part 1: General equations, parameters, and terminology, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 7, 5989–6023, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5989-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5989-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Remorov et~al.(2002)Remorov, Gershenzon, Molina, and
Molina}}?><label>Remorov et al.(2002)Remorov, Gershenzon, Molina, and
Molina</label><?label Remorov2002?><mixed-citation>Remorov, R. G., Gershenzon, Y. M., Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Kinetics
and Mechanism of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M965" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Uptake on Solid NaCl,  J. Phys. Chem.
A, 106, 4558–4565, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp013179o" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp013179o</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Renbaum and Smith(2011)}}?><label>Renbaum and Smith(2011)</label><?label Renbaum2011?><mixed-citation>Renbaum, L. H. and Smith, G. D.: Artifacts in measuring aerosol uptake kinetics: the roles of time, concentration and adsorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6881–6893, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6881-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6881-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Roeselov{\'{a}} et~al.(2003)Roeselov{\'{a}}, Jungwirth, Tobias, and
Gerber}}?><label>Roeselová et al.(2003)Roeselová, Jungwirth, Tobias, and
Gerber</label><?label Roeselova2003?><mixed-citation>Roeselová, M., Jungwirth, P., Tobias, D. J., and Gerber, R. B.: Impact,
Trapping, and Accommodation of Hydroxyl Radical and Ozone at Aqueous Salt
Aerosol Surfaces,  A Molecular Dynamics Study,   J. Phys.
Chem. B, 107, 12690–12699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp030592i" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp030592i</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Saffari et~al.(2014)Saffari, Daher, Shafer, Schauer, and
Sioutas}}?><label>Saffari et al.(2014)Saffari, Daher, Shafer, Schauer, and
Sioutas</label><?label Saffari2014?><mixed-citation>Saffari, A., Daher, N., Shafer, M. M., Schauer, J. J., and Sioutas, C.: Global
Perspective on the Oxidative Potential of Airborne Particulate Matter: A
Synthesis of Research Findings, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
7576–7583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es500937x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es500937x</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schwartz(1986)}}?><label>Schwartz(1986)</label><?label Schwartz1986?><mixed-citation>Schwartz, S. E.: Mass-Transport Considerations Pertinent to Aqueous Phase
Reactions of Gases in Liquid-Water Clouds, in: Chemistry of Multiphase
Atmospheric Systems of Multiphase Atmospheric Systems, edited by: Jaeschke,
W., NATO ASI Series, Series G: Ecological Sciences, Berlin,
Heidelberg, Springer,  415–471, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70627-1_16" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-70627-1_16</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Seinfeld and Pandis(1998)}}?><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(1998)</label><?label Seinfeld1998?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, John
Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, ISBN 13 9780471178163, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shahpoury et~al.(2021)Shahpoury, Zhang, Arangio, Celo,
Dabek-Zlotorzynska, Harner, and Nenes}}?><label>Shahpoury et al.(2021)Shahpoury, Zhang, Arangio, Celo,
Dabek-Zlotorzynska, Harner, and Nenes</label><?label Shahpoury2021?><mixed-citation>Shahpoury, P., Zhang, Z. W., Arangio, A., Celo, V., Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E.,
Harner, T., and Nenes, A.: The influence of chemical composition, aerosol
acidity, and metal dissolution on the oxidative potential of fine particulate
matter and redox potential of the lung lining fluid, Environ.
Int., 148, 106343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2020.106343</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Slade and Knopf(2013)}}?><label>Slade and Knopf(2013)</label><?label Slade2013?><mixed-citation>Slade, J. H. and Knopf, D. A.: Heterogeneous OH oxidation of biomass burning
organic aerosol surrogate compounds: assessment of volatilisation products
and the role of OH concentration on the reactive uptake kinetics, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 5898–5915, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP44695F" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3CP44695F</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Smith et~al.(2009)Smith, Kroll, Cappa, Che, Liu, Ahmed, Leone,
Worsnop, and Wilson}}?><label>Smith et al.(2009)Smith, Kroll, Cappa, Che, Liu, Ahmed, Leone,
Worsnop, and Wilson</label><?label Smith2009?><mixed-citation>Smith, J. D., Kroll, J. H., Cappa, C. D., Che, D. L., Liu, C. L., Ahmed, M.,
Leone, S. R., Worsnop, D. R., and Wilson, K. R.: The heterogeneous reaction
of hydroxyl radicals with sub-micron squalane particles: a model system for
understanding the oxidative aging of ambient aerosols, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 3209–3222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3209-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3209-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Song et~al.(2020)Song, Chen, Lu, Zou, Tan, Fuchs, Wiedensohler, Moon,
Heard, Baeza-Romero, Zheng, Wahner, Kiendler-Scharr, and Zhang}}?><label>Song et al.(2020)Song, Chen, Lu, Zou, Tan, Fuchs, Wiedensohler, Moon,
Heard, Baeza-Romero, Zheng, Wahner, Kiendler-Scharr, and Zhang</label><?label Song2020?><mixed-citation>Song, H., Chen, X., Lu, K., Zou, Q., Tan, Z., Fuchs, H., Wiedensohler, A.,
Moon, D. R., Heard, D. E., Baeza-Romero, M.-T., Zheng, M., Wahner, A.,
Kiendler-Scharr, A., and Zhang, Y.: Influence of aerosol copper on
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M966" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake: a novel parameterized equation, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 20, 15835–15850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15835-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-15835-2020</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Stadtler et~al.(2018)Stadtler, Simpson, Schr{\"{o}}der, Taraborrelli,
Bott, and Schultz}}?><label>Stadtler et al.(2018)Stadtler, Simpson, Schröder, Taraborrelli,
Bott, and Schultz</label><?label Stadtler2018?><mixed-citation>Stadtler, S., Simpson, D., Schröder, S., Taraborrelli, D., Bott, A., and Schultz, M.: Ozone impacts of gas–aerosol uptake in global chemistry transport models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3147–3171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3147-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-3147-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Stohs and Bagchi(1995)}}?><label>Stohs and Bagchi(1995)</label><?label Stohs1995?><mixed-citation>Stohs, S. J. and Bagchi, D.: Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal
ions, Free Radical Bio. Med., 18, 321–336,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(94)00159-h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0891-5849(94)00159-h</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Takahama et~al.(2008)Takahama, Gilardoni, and Russell}}?><label>Takahama et al.(2008)Takahama, Gilardoni, and Russell</label><?label Takahama2008?><mixed-citation>Takahama, S., Gilardoni, S., and Russell, L. M.: Single-particle oxidation
state and morphology of atmospheric iron aerosols, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D22202,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009810" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009810</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Taketani et~al.(2008)Taketani, Kanaya, and Akimoto}}?><label>Taketani et al.(2008)Taketani, Kanaya, and Akimoto</label><?label Taketani2008?><mixed-citation>Taketani, F., Kanaya, Y., and Akimoto, H.: Kinetics of Heterogeneous Reactions
of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M967" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Radical at Ambient Concentration Levels with
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M968" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M969" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M970" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NaCl Aerosol
Particles,  J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 2370–2377,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0769936" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp0769936</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Taketani et~al.(2012)Taketani, Kanaya, Pochanart, Liu, Li, Okuzawa,
Kawamura, Wang, and Akimoto}}?><label>Taketani et al.(2012)Taketani, Kanaya, Pochanart, Liu, Li, Okuzawa,
Kawamura, Wang, and Akimoto</label><?label Taketani2012?><mixed-citation>Taketani, F., Kanaya, Y., Pochanart, P., Liu, Y., Li, J., Okuzawa, K.,
Kawamura, K., Wang, Z., and Akimoto, H.: Measurement of overall uptake
coefficients for HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M971" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals by aerosol particles sampled
from ambient air at Mts. Tai and Mang (China), Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 11907–11916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11907-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11907-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tan et~al.(2020)Tan, Hofzumahaus, Lu, Brown, Holland, Huey,
Kiendler-Scharr, Li, Liu, Ma, Min, Rohrer, Shao, Wahner, Wang, Wiedensohler,
Wu, Wu, Zeng, Zhang, and Fuchs}}?><label>Tan et al.(2020)Tan, Hofzumahaus, Lu, Brown, Holland, Huey,
Kiendler-Scharr, Li, Liu, Ma, Min, Rohrer, Shao, Wahner, Wang, Wiedensohler,
Wu, Wu, Zeng, Zhang, and Fuchs</label><?label Tan2020?><mixed-citation>Tan, Z., Hofzumahaus, A., Lu, K., Brown, S. S., Holland, F., Huey, L. G.,
Kiendler-Scharr, A., Li, X., Liu, X., Ma, N., Min, K.-E., Rohrer, F., Shao,
M., Wahner, A., Wang, Y., Wiedensohler, A., Wu, Y., Wu, Z., Zeng, L., Zhang,
Y., and Fuchs, H.: No Evidence for a Significant Impact of Heterogeneous
Chemistry on Radical Concentrations in the North China Plain in Summer 2014,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 5973–5979,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00525" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c00525</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Thornton and Abbatt(2005)}}?><label>Thornton and Abbatt(2005)</label><?label Thornton2005?><mixed-citation>Thornton, J. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Measurements of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M972" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
to aqueous aerosol: Mass accommodation coefficients and net reactive loss,
J. Geophys. Res., 100, D08309,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005402" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005402</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tilgner et~al.(2013)Tilgner, Br{\"{a}}uer, Wolke, and
Herrmann}}?><label>Tilgner et al.(2013)Tilgner, Bräuer, Wolke, and
Herrmann</label><?label Tilgner2013?><mixed-citation>Tilgner, A., Bräuer, P., Wolke, R., and Herrmann, H.: Modelling
multiphase chemistry in deliquescent aerosols and clouds using CAPRAM3.0i,
J. Atmos. Chem., 70, 221–256,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-013-9267-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-013-9267-4</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tong et~al.(2016)Tong, Arangio, Lakey, Berkemeier, Liu, Kampf, Brune,
P{\"{o}}schl, and Shiraiwa}}?><label>Tong et al.(2016)Tong, Arangio, Lakey, Berkemeier, Liu, Kampf, Brune,
Pöschl, and Shiraiwa</label><?label Tong2016?><mixed-citation>Tong, H., Arangio, A. M., Lakey, P. S. J., Berkemeier, T., Liu, F., Kampf,
C. J., Brune, W. H., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.: Hydroxyl radicals
from secondary organic aerosol decomposition in water, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
16, 1761–1771, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1761-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1761-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tong et~al.(2017)Tong, Lakey, Arangio, Socorro, Kampf, Berkemeier,
Brune, P{\"{o}}schl, and Shiraiwa}}?><label>Tong et al.(2017)Tong, Lakey, Arangio, Socorro, Kampf, Berkemeier,
Brune, Pöschl, and Shiraiwa</label><?label Tong2017?><mixed-citation>Tong, H., Lakey, P. S. J., Arangio, A. M., Socorro, J., Kampf, C. J.,
Berkemeier, T., Brune, W. H., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.: Reactive
oxygen species formed in aqueous mixtures of secondary organic aerosols and
mineral dust influencing cloud chemistry and public health in the
Anthropocene, Faraday Discuss., 200, 251–270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C7FD00023E" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C7FD00023E</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tong et~al.(2020)Tong, Liu, Filippi, Wilson, Arangio, Zhang, Yue,
Lelieveld, Shen, Keskinen, Li, Chen, Zhang, Hoffmann, Fu, Brune,
Pet{\"{a}}j{\"{a}}, Kulmala, Yao, Berkemeier, Shiraiwa, and
P{\"{o}}schl}}?><label>Tong et al.(2020)Tong, Liu, Filippi, Wilson, Arangio, Zhang, Yue,
Lelieveld, Shen, Keskinen, Li, Chen, Zhang, Hoffmann, Fu, Brune,
Petäjä, Kulmala, Yao, Berkemeier, <?pagebreak page2009?>Shiraiwa, and
Pöschl</label><?label Tong2020?><mixed-citation>Tong, H., Liu, F., Filippi, A., Wilson, J., Arangio, A. M., Zhang, Y., Yue, S., Lelieveld, S., Shen, F., Keskinen, H.-M. K., Li, J., Chen, H., Zhang, T., Hoffmann, T., Fu, P., Brune, W. H., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Yao, M., Berkemeier, T., Shiraiwa, M., and Pöschl, U.: Aqueous-phase reactive species formed by fine particulate matter from remote forests and polluted urban air, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10439–10455, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10439-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-10439-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Verma et~al.(2012)Verma, Rico-Martinez, Kotra, King, Liu, Snell, and
Weber}}?><label>Verma et al.(2012)Verma, Rico-Martinez, Kotra, King, Liu, Snell, and
Weber</label><?label Verma2012?><mixed-citation>Verma, V., Rico-Martinez, R., Kotra, N., King, L., Liu, J., Snell, T. W., and
Weber, R. J.: Contribution of Water-Soluble and Insoluble Components and
Their Hydrophobic/Hydrophilic Subfractions to the Reactive Oxygen
Species-Generating Potential of Fine Ambient Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 11384–11392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es302484r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es302484r</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang et~al.(2015)Wang, Balkanski, Boucher, Bopp, Chappell, Ciais,
Hauglustaine, Pe{\~{n}}uelas, and Tao}}?><label>Wang et al.(2015)Wang, Balkanski, Boucher, Bopp, Chappell, Ciais,
Hauglustaine, Peñuelas, and Tao</label><?label Wang2015?><mixed-citation>Wang, R., Balkanski, Y., Boucher, O., Bopp, L., Chappell, A., Ciais, P.,
Hauglustaine, D., Peñuelas, J., and Tao, S.: Sources, transport and
deposition of iron in the global atmosphere, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 6247–6270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6247-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6247-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Waring et~al.(2011)Waring, King, Bagot, Costen, and
McKendrick}}?><label>Waring et al.(2011)Waring, King, Bagot, Costen, and
McKendrick</label><?label Waring2011?><mixed-citation>Waring, C., King, K. L., Bagot, P. A. J., Costen, M. L., and McKendrick, K. G.:
Collision dynamics and reactive uptake of OH radicals at liquid surfaces of
atmospheric interest, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 8457–8469,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP02734K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C0CP02734K</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wei et~al.(2021)Wei, Fang, Wong, Lakey, Nizkorodov, and
Shiraiwa}}?><label>Wei et al.(2021)Wei, Fang, Wong, Lakey, Nizkorodov, and
Shiraiwa</label><?label Wei2021?><mixed-citation>Wei, J., Fang, T., Wong, C., Lakey, P. S. J., Nizkorodov, S. A., and Shiraiwa,
M.: Superoxide Formation from Aqueous Reactions of Biogenic Secondary
Organic Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 260–270,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07789" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c07789</ext-link>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Xuan et~al.(2020)Xuan, Chen, Gong, Shen, and Chen}}?><label>Xuan et al.(2020)Xuan, Chen, Gong, Shen, and Chen</label><?label Xuan2020?><mixed-citation>Xuan, X., Chen, Z., Gong, Y., Shen, H., and Chen, S.: Partitioning of hydrogen
peroxide in gas-liquid and gas-aerosol phases, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 20, 5513–5526, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5513-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-5513-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhang et~al.(2014)Zhang, Bi, Lou, Li, Wang, Wang, Zhou, Sheng, Fu,
and Chen}}?><label>Zhang et al.(2014)Zhang, Bi, Lou, Li, Wang, Wang, Zhou, Sheng, Fu,
and Chen</label><?label Zhang2014?><mixed-citation>Zhang, G., Bi, X., Lou, S., Li, L., Wang, H., Wang, X., Zhou, Z., Sheng, G.,
Fu, J., and Chen, C.: Source and mixing state of iron-containing particles
in Shanghai by individual particle analysis, Chemosphere, 95, 9–16,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.046</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhou et~al.(2020)Zhou, Murano, Kohno, Sakamoto, and Kajii}}?><label>Zhou et al.(2020)Zhou, Murano, Kohno, Sakamoto, and Kajii</label><?label Zhou2020?><mixed-citation>Zhou, J., Murano, K., Kohno, N., Sakamoto, Y., and Kajii, Y.: Real-time
quantification of the total HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M973" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reactivity of ambient air and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M974" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
kinetics onto ambient aerosols in Kyoto (Japan), Atmos. Environ.,
223, 117189, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117189" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117189</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhou et~al.(2021)Zhou, Sato, Bai, Fukusaki, Kousa, Ramasamy, Takami,
Yoshino, Nakayama, Sadanaga, Nakashima, Li, Murano, Kohno, Sakamoto, and
Kajii}}?><label>Zhou et al.(2021)Zhou, Sato, Bai, Fukusaki, Kousa, Ramasamy, Takami,
Yoshino, Nakayama, Sadanaga, Nakashima, Li, Murano, Kohno, Sakamoto, and
Kajii</label><?label Zhou2021?><mixed-citation>Zhou, J., Sato, K., Bai, Y., Fukusaki, Y., Kousa, Y., Ramasamy, S., Takami, A., Yoshino, A., Nakayama, T., Sadanaga, Y., Nakashima, Y., Li, J., Murano, K., Kohno, N., Sakamoto, Y., and Kajii, Y.: Kinetics and impacting factors of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M975" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake onto submicron atmospheric aerosols during the 2019 Air QUAlity Study (AQUAS) in Yokohama, Japan , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12243–12260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12243-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-12243-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The number fraction of iron-containing particles affects OH, HO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> budgets in the atmospheric aqueous phase</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Al-Abadleh(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Al-Abadleh, H. A.: Review of the bulk and surface chemistry of iron in
atmospherically relevant systems containing humic-like substances, RSC
Adv., 5, 45785–45811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA03132J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA03132J</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Alexander et al.(2009)Alexander, Park, Jacob, and
Gong</label><mixed-citation>
Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., and Gong, S.: Transition
metal-catalyzed oxidation of atmospheric sulfur: Global implications for the
sulfur budget, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D02309,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010486" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010486</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Arangio et al.(2015)Arangio, Slade, Berkemeier, Pöschl, Knopf,
and Shiraiwa</label><mixed-citation>
Arangio, A. M., Slade, J. H., Berkemeier, T., Pöschl, U., Knopf, D. A.,
and Shiraiwa, M.: Multiphase Chemical Kinetics of OH Radical Uptake by
Molecular Organic Markers of Biomass Burning Aerosols: Humidity and
Temperature Dependence, Surface Reaction, and Bulk Diffusion, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 119, 4533–4544, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp510489z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp510489z</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Arangio et al.(2016)Arangio, Tong, Socorro, Pöschl, and
Shiraiwa</label><mixed-citation>
Arangio, A. M., Tong, H., Socorro, J., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.:
Quantification of environmentally persistent free radicals and reactive
oxygen species in atmospheric aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
13105–13119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13105-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13105-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Barth et al.(2021)Barth, Ervens, Herrmann, Tilgner, McNeill, Tsui,
Deguillaume, Chaumerliac, Carlton, and Lance</label><mixed-citation>
Barth, M. C., Ervens, B., Herrmann, H., Tilgner, A., McNeill, V. F., Tsui,
W. G., Deguillaume, L., Chaumerliac, N., Carlton, A. G., and Lance, S.: Box
Model Intercomparison of Cloud Chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD035486, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035486" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035486</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bedjanian et al.(2005)Bedjanian, Lelièvre, and Le
Bras</label><mixed-citation>
Bedjanian, Y., Lelièvre, S., and Le Bras, G.: Experimental study of
the interaction of HO<sub>2</sub> radicals with soot surface, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
7, 334–341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B414217A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B414217A</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bertram et al.(2001)Bertram, Ivanov, Hunter, Molina, and
Molina</label><mixed-citation>
Bertram, A. K., Ivanov, A. V., Hunter, M., Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.:
The reaction probability of OH on Organic Surfaces of Tropospheric
Interest,  J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 9415–9421,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0114034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0114034</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bianchini et al.(2018)Bianchini, Tesa-Serrate, Costen, and
McKendrick</label><mixed-citation>
Bianchini, R. H., Tesa-Serrate, M. A., Costen, M. L., and McKendrick, K. G.:
Collision-Energy Dependence of the Uptake of Hydroxyl Radicals at
Atmospherically Relevant Liquid Surfaces,   J. Phys. Chem.
C, 122, 6648–6660, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12574" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12574</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bianco et al.(2015)Bianco, Passananti, Perroux, Voyard,
Mouchel-Vallon, Chaumerliac, Mailhot, Deguillaume, and Brigante</label><mixed-citation>
Bianco, A., Passananti, M., Perroux, H., Voyard, G., Mouchel-Vallon, C.,
Chaumerliac, N., Mailhot, G., Deguillaume, L., and Brigante, M.: A better
understanding of hydroxyl radical photochemical sources in cloud waters
collected at the puy de Dôme station – experimental versus modelled
formation rates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9191–9202,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9191-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9191-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Chan et al.(2014)Chan, Zhang, Goldstein, and Wilson</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, M. N., Zhang, H., Goldstein, A. H., and Wilson, K. R.: Role of Water and
Phase in the Heterogeneous Oxidation of Solid and Aqueous Succinic Acid
Aerosol by Hydroxyl Radicals,  J. Phys. Chem. C, 118,
28978–28992, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5012022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5012022</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Chang et al.(1987)Chang, Brost, Isaksen, Madronich, Middleton,
Stockwell, and Walcek</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, J. S., Brost, R. A., Isaksen, I. S. A., Madronich, S., Middleton, P.,
Stockwell, W. R., and Walcek, C. J.: A three-dimensional Eulerian acid
deposition model: Physical concepts and formulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 92, 14681–14700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD12p14681" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD12p14681</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Charrier and Anastasio(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Charrier, J. G. and Anastasio, C.: On dithiothreitol (DTT) as a measure of
oxidative potential for ambient particles: evidence for the importance of
soluble transition metals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
9321–9333, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9321-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9321-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Charrier et al.(2015)Charrier, Richards-Henderson, Bein, McFall,
Wexler, and Anastasio</label><mixed-citation>
Charrier, J. G., Richards-Henderson, N. K., Bein, K. J., McFall, A. S., Wexler, A. S., and Anastasio, C.: Oxidant production from source-oriented particulate matter – Part 1: Oxidative potential using the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2327–2340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2327-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2327-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Che et al.(2009)Che, Smith, Leone, Ahmed, and Wilson</label><mixed-citation>
Che, D. L., Smith, J. D., Leone, S. R., Ahmed, M., and Wilson, K. R.:
Quantifying the reactive uptake of OH by organic aerosols in a continuous
flow stirred tank reactor, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 7885–7895,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B904418C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B904418C</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Choël et al.(2007)Choël, Deboudt, Flament, Aimoz, and
Mériaux</label><mixed-citation>
Choël, M., Deboudt, K., Flament, P., Aimoz, L., and Mériaux, X.:
Single-particle analysis of atmospheric aerosols at Cape Gris-Nez, English
Channel: Influence of steel works on iron apportionment, Atmos.
Environ., 41, 2820–2830, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.038</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Christian et al.(2017)Christian, Brune, and Mao</label><mixed-citation>
Christian, K. E., Brune, W. H., and Mao, J.: Global sensitivity analysis of
the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model: ozone and hydrogen oxides during
ARCTAS (2008), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3769–3784,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3769-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3769-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Cini et al.(2002)Cini, Prodi, Santachiara, Porcu, Bellandi, Stortini,
Oppo, Udisti, and Pantani</label><mixed-citation>
Cini, R., Prodi, F., Santachiara, G., Porcu, F., Bellandi, S., Stortini, A.,
Oppo, C., Udisti, R., and Pantani, F.: Chemical characterization of cloud
episodes at a ridge site in Tuscan Appennines, Italy, Atmos. Res.,
61, 311–334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00139-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00139-9</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Cooper and Abbatt(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Cooper, P. L. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Heterogeneous Interactions of OH and
HO<sub>2</sub> Radicals with Surfaces Characteristic of Atmospheric
Particulate Matter,   J. Phys. Chem., 100, 2249–2254,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp952142z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp952142z</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Deguillaume et al.(2004)Deguillaume, Leriche, Monod, and
Chaumerliac</label><mixed-citation>
Deguillaume, L., Leriche, M., Monod, A., and Chaumerliac, N.: The role of
transition metal ions on
HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> radicals in
clouds: a numerical evaluation of its impact on multiphase chemistry, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 4, 95–110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-95-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-95-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Deguillaume et al.(2005)Deguillaume, Leriche, Desboeufs, Mailhot,
George, and Chaumerliac</label><mixed-citation>
Deguillaume, L., Leriche, M., Desboeufs, K., Mailhot, G., George, C., and
Chaumerliac, N.: Transition metals in atmospheric liquid particles: Sources,
reactivity and sensitive parameters, Chem. Rev., 105, 3388–3431,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr040649c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr040649c</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Ervens(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B.: Modeling the Processing of Aerosol and Trace Gases in Clouds and
Fogs, Chem. Rev., 115, 4157–4198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Ervens(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B.: Model output, Khaled et al., Iron distribution in the aqueous phase, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5829360" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5829360</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Ervens et al.(2003)Ervens, George, Williams, Buxton, Salmon, Bydder,
Wilkinson, Dentener, Mirabel, Wolke, and Herrmann</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., George, C., Williams, J. E., Buxton, G. V., Salmon, G. A., Bydder,
M., Wilkinson, F., Dentener, F., Mirabel, P., Wolke, R., and Herrmann, H.:
CAPRAM2.4 (MODAC mechanism): An extended and condensed tropospheric aqueous
phase mechanism and its application, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4426, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002202" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002202</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Ervens et al.(2008)Ervens, Carlton, Turpin, Altieri, Kreidenweis, and
Feingold</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Altieri, K. E., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
and Feingold, G.: Secondary organic aerosol yields from cloud-processing of
isoprene oxidation products, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L02816,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031828</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Ervens et al.(2011)Ervens, Turpin, and Weber</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Ervens et al.(2014)Ervens, Sorooshian, Lim, and Turpin</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Sorooshian, A., Lim, Y. B., and Turpin, B. J.: Key parameters
controlling OH-initiated formation of secondary organic aerosol in the
aqueous phase (aqSOA), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 3997–4016,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021021</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Fang et al.(2016)Fang, Verma, Bates, Abrams, Klein, Strickland,
Sarnat, Chang, Mulholland, Tolbert, Russell, and Weber</label><mixed-citation>
Fang, T., Verma, V., Bates, J. T., Abrams, J., Klein, M., Strickland, M. J., Sarnat, S. E., Chang, H. H., Mulholland, J. A., Tolbert, P. E., Russell, A. G., and Weber, R. J.: Oxidative potential of ambient water-soluble PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the southeastern United States: contrasts in sources and health associations between ascorbic acid (AA) and dithiothreitol (DTT) assays, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3865–3879, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3865-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3865-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Fang et al.(2017)Fang, Guo, Zeng, Verma, Nenes, and Weber</label><mixed-citation>
Fang, T., Guo, H., Zeng, L., Verma, V., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Highly
Acidic Ambient Particles, Soluble Metals, and Oxidative Potential: A Link
between Sulfate and Aerosol Toxicity, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
51, 2611–2620, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06151" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06151</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Fomba et al.(2015)Fomba, van Pinxteren, Müller, Iinuma, Lee,
Collett Jr., and Herrmann</label><mixed-citation>
Fomba, K. W., van Pinxteren, D., Müller, K., Iinuma, Y., Lee, T.,
Collett Jr., J. L., and Herrmann, H.: Trace metal characterization of
aerosol particles and cloud water during HCCT 2010, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 8751–8765, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8751-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8751-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Furutani et al.(2011)Furutani, Jung, Miura, Takami, Kato, Kajii, and
Uematsu</label><mixed-citation>
Furutani, H., Jung, J., Miura, K., Takami, A., Kato, S., Kajii, Y., and
Uematsu, M.: Single-particle chemical characterization and source
apportionment of iron-containing atmospheric aerosols in Asian outflow, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D18204,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015867" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015867</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>George et al.(2007)George, Vlasenko, Slowik, Broekhuizen, and
Abbatt</label><mixed-citation>
George, I. J., Vlasenko, A., Slowik, J. G., Broekhuizen, K., and Abbatt, J.
P. D.: Heterogeneous oxidation of saturated organic aerosols by hydroxyl
radicals: uptake kinetics, condensed-phase products, and particle size
change, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4187–4201,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4187-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4187-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Guo et al.(2019)Guo, Wang, Tao Wang, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, J., Wang, Z.,  Wang, T., and Zhang, X.: Theoretical evaluation of
different factors affecting the HO<sub>2</sub> uptake coefficient driven by
aqueous-phase first-order loss reaction, Sci. Total Environ.,
683, 146–153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.237" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.237</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Haggerstone et al.(2005)Haggerstone, Carpenter, N., and
McFiggans</label><mixed-citation>
Haggerstone, A.-L., Carpenter, L. J., N., C., and McFiggans, G.: Improved
model predictions of
HO<sub>2</sub> with gas to
particle mass transfer rates calculated using aerosol number size
distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 110, , D04303,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005282" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005282</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Hanson et al.(1992)Hanson, Burkholder, Howard, and
Ravishankara</label><mixed-citation>
Hanson, D. R., Burkholder, J. B., Howard, C. J., and Ravishankara, A. R.:
Measurement of hydroxyl and hydroperoxy radical uptake coefficients on water
and sulfuric acid surfaces, J. Phys. Chem., 96, 4979–4985,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100191a046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/j100191a046</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Hasson and Paulson(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Hasson, A. S. and Paulson, S. E.: An investigation of the relationship between
gas-phase and aerosol borne hydroperoxides in urban air, J. Aerosol Sci.,
34, 459–468, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00002-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00002-8</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Herrmann et al.(2000)Herrmann, Ervens, Jacobi, Wolke, Nowacki, and
Zellner</label><mixed-citation>
Herrmann, H., Ervens, B., Jacobi, H.-W., Wolke, R., Nowacki, P., and Zellner,
R.: CAPRAM2.3: A Chemical Aqueous Phase Radical Mechanism for Tropospheric
Chemistry, J. Atmos. Chem., 36, 231–284,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Houle et al.(2015)Houle, Hinsberg, and Wilson</label><mixed-citation>
Houle, F. A., Hinsberg, W. D., and Wilson, K. R.: Oxidation of a model alkane
aerosol by OH radical: the emergent nature of reactive uptake, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 17, 4412–4423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP05093B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP05093B</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Ingall et al.(2018)Ingall, Feng, Longo, Lai, Shelley, Landing,
Morton, Nenes, Mihalopoulos, Violaki, Gao, Sahai, and Castorina</label><mixed-citation>
Ingall, E. D., Feng, Y., Longo, A. F., Lai, B., Shelley, R. U., Landing, W. M.,
Morton, P. L., Nenes, A., Mihalopoulos, N., Violaki, K., Gao, Y., Sahai, S.,
and Castorina, E.: Enhanced Iron Solubility at Low pH in Global Aerosols, Atmosphere, 9, 201,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9050201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9050201</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Jacob(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Jacob, D. J.: Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Environ.,
34, 2131–2159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00462-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00462-8</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Khaled et al.(2021)Khaled, Zhang, Amato, Delort, and
Ervens</label><mixed-citation>
Khaled, A., Zhang, M., Amato, P., Delort, A.-M., and Ervens, B.:
Biodegradation by bacteria in clouds: an underestimated sink for some
organics in the atmospheric multiphase system, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 21, 3123–3141, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3123-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3123-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Lakey et al.(2015)Lakey, George, Whalley, Baeza-Romero, and
Heard</label><mixed-citation>
Lakey, P. S. J., George, I. J., Whalley, L. K., Baeza-Romero, M. T., and Heard,
D. E.: Measurements of the HO<sub>2</sub> Uptake Coefficients onto Single Component
Organic Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 4878–4885,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00948" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00948</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Lakey et al.(2016)Lakey, Berkemeier, Krapf, Dommen, Steimer, Whalley,
Ingham, Baeza-Romero, Pöschl, Shiraiwa, Ammann, and Heard</label><mixed-citation>
Lakey, P. S. J., Berkemeier, T., Krapf, M., Dommen, J., Steimer, S. S.,
Whalley, L. K., Ingham, T., Baeza-Romero, M. T., Pöschl, U., Shiraiwa,
M., Ammann, M., and Heard, D. E.: The effect of viscosity and diffusion on
the HO<sub>2</sub> uptake by sucrose and secondary organic aerosol particles, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 13035–13047, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13035-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13035-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Li and Knopf(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J. and Knopf, D. A.: Representation of Multiphase OH Oxidation of
Amorphous Organic Aerosol for Tropospheric Conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 7266–7275,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07668" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07668</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Li et al.(2019)Li, Jacob, Liao, Shen, Zhang, and Bates</label><mixed-citation>
Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Shen, L., Zhang, Q., and Bates, K. H.:
Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in
China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 422–427,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812168116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812168116</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Luo et al.(2005)Luo, Mahowald, Meskhidze, Chen, Siefert, Baker, and
Johansen</label><mixed-citation>
Luo, C., Mahowald, N. M., Meskhidze, N., Chen, Y., Siefert, R. L., Baker,
A. R., and Johansen, A. M.: Estimation of iron solubility from observations
and a global aerosol model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
110, D23307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006059</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Lyu et al.(2018)Lyu, Guo, Cheng, and Li</label><mixed-citation>
Lyu, Y., Guo, H., Cheng, T., and Li, X.: Particle Size Distributions of
Oxidative Potential of Lung-Deposited Particles: Assessing Contributions from
Quinones and Water-Soluble Metals, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 6592–6600, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06686" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06686</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Macintyre and Evans(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Macintyre, H. L. and Evans, M. J.: Parameterisation and impact of aerosol
uptake of HO<sub>2</sub> on a global tropospheric model, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 10965–10974, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10965-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10965-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Madronich and Calvert(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Madronich, S. and Calvert, J. G.: The NCAR Master Mechanism of the Gas Phase
Chemistry – Version 2.0, Tech. Rep., No. NCAR/TN-333+STR, University
Corporation for Atmospheric Research,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6HD7SKH" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6HD7SKH</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Mao et al.(2013)Mao, Fan, Jacob, and Travis</label><mixed-citation>
Mao, J., Fan, S., Jacob, D. J., and Travis, K. R.: Radical loss in the atmosphere from Cu-Fe redox coupling in aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 509–519, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-509-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-509-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Mao et al.(2017)Mao, Fan, and Horowitz</label><mixed-citation>
Mao, J., Fan, S., and Horowitz, L. W.: Soluble Fe in Aerosols Sustained by
Gaseous HO<sub>2</sub> Uptake, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 4,
98–104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Matthews et al.(2014)Matthews, Baeza-Romero, Whalley, and
Heard</label><mixed-citation>
Matthews, P. S. J., Baeza-Romero, M. T., Whalley, L. K., and Heard, D. E.:
Uptake of HO<sub>2</sub> radicals onto Arizona test dust particles
using an aerosol flow tube, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
7397–7408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7397-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7397-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Moffet et al.(2012)Moffet, Furutani, Rödel, Henn, Sprau,
Laskin, Uematsu, and Gilles</label><mixed-citation>
Moffet, R. C., Furutani, H., Rödel, T. C., Henn, T. R., Sprau, P. O.,
Laskin, A., Uematsu, M., and Gilles, M. K.: Iron speciation and mixing in
single aerosol particles from the Asian continental outflow, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D07204,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016746" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016746</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Molina et al.(2020)Molina, Toro A., Manzano, Canepari, Massimi, and
Leiva-Guzmán</label><mixed-citation>
Molina, C., Toro A., R., Manzano, C. A., Canepari, S., Massimi, L., and
Leiva-Guzmán, M. A.: Airborne Aerosols and Human Health: Leapfrogging
from Mass Concentration to Oxidative Potential, Atmosphere, 11, 917,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11090917" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11090917</a>,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Moon et al.(2018)Moon, Taverna, Anduix-Canto, Ingham, Chipperfield,
Seakins, Baeza-Romero, and Heard</label><mixed-citation>
Moon, D. R., Taverna, G. S., Anduix-Canto, C., Ingham, T., Chipperfield, M. P.,
Seakins, P. W., Baeza-Romero, M.-T., and Heard, D. E.: Heterogeneous
reaction of HO<sub>2</sub> with airborne TiO<sub>2</sub>
particles and its implication for climate change mitigation strategies,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 327–338,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-327-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-327-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Morita et al.(2004)Morita, Kanaya, and Francisco</label><mixed-citation>
Morita, A., Kanaya, Y., and Francisco, J. S.: Uptake of the HO<sub>2</sub> radical by
water: Molecular dynamics calculations and their implications for atmospheric
modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D09201,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004240" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004240</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Mozurkewich et al.(1987)Mozurkewich, H, Gupta, and
Calvert</label><mixed-citation>
Mozurkewich, M., H, M. P., Gupta, A., and Calvert, J. G.: Mass Accommodation
Coefficient for HO<sub>2</sub> Radicals on Aqueous Particles, J.
Geophys. Res., 92, 4163–4170, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Myriokefalitakis et al.(2018)Myriokefalitakis, Ito, Kanakidou, Nenes,
Krol, Mahowald, Scanza, Hamilton, Johnson, Meskhidze, Kok, Guieu, Baker,
Jickells, Sarin, Bikkina, Shelley, Bowie, Perron, and
Duce</label><mixed-citation>
Myriokefalitakis, S., Ito, A., Kanakidou, M., Nenes, A., Krol, M. C., Mahowald,
N. M., Scanza, R. A., Hamilton, D. S., Johnson, M. S., Meskhidze, N., Kok,
J. F., Guieu, C., Baker, A. R., Jickells, T. D., Sarin, M. M., Bikkina, S.,
Shelley, R., Bowie, A., Perron, M. M. G., and Duce, R. A.: Reviews and
syntheses: the GESAMP atmospheric iron deposition model intercomparison
study, Biogeosciences, 15, 6659–6684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6659-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6659-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Nathanson et al.(1996)Nathanson, Davidovits, Worsnop, and
Kolb</label><mixed-citation>
Nathanson, G. M., Davidovits, P., Worsnop, D. R., and Kolb, C. E.: Dynamics
and Kinetics at the Gas-Liquid Interface, J. Phys. Chem., 100,
13007–13020, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp953548e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp953548e</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Pöschl and Shiraiwa(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Pöschl, U. and Shiraiwa, M.: Multiphase Chemistry at the
Atmosphere–Biosphere Interface Influencing Climate and Public Health in the
Anthropocene, Chem. Rev., 115, 4440–4475, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500487s" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500487s</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Pöschl et al.(2007)Pöschl, Rudich, and
Ammann</label><mixed-citation>
Pöschl, U., Rudich, Y., and Ammann, M.: Kinetic model framework for
aerosol and cloud surface chemistry and gas-particle interactions &amp;ndash;
Part 1: General equations, parameters, and terminology, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 7, 5989–6023, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5989-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5989-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Remorov et al.(2002)Remorov, Gershenzon, Molina, and
Molina</label><mixed-citation>
Remorov, R. G., Gershenzon, Y. M., Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Kinetics
and Mechanism of HO<sub>2</sub> Uptake on Solid NaCl,  J. Phys. Chem.
A, 106, 4558–4565, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp013179o" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp013179o</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Renbaum and Smith(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Renbaum, L. H. and Smith, G. D.: Artifacts in measuring aerosol uptake kinetics: the roles of time, concentration and adsorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6881–6893, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6881-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6881-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Roeselová et al.(2003)Roeselová, Jungwirth, Tobias, and
Gerber</label><mixed-citation>
Roeselová, M., Jungwirth, P., Tobias, D. J., and Gerber, R. B.: Impact,
Trapping, and Accommodation of Hydroxyl Radical and Ozone at Aqueous Salt
Aerosol Surfaces,  A Molecular Dynamics Study,   J. Phys.
Chem. B, 107, 12690–12699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp030592i" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp030592i</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Saffari et al.(2014)Saffari, Daher, Shafer, Schauer, and
Sioutas</label><mixed-citation>
Saffari, A., Daher, N., Shafer, M. M., Schauer, J. J., and Sioutas, C.: Global
Perspective on the Oxidative Potential of Airborne Particulate Matter: A
Synthesis of Research Findings, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
7576–7583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es500937x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es500937x</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Schwartz(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwartz, S. E.: Mass-Transport Considerations Pertinent to Aqueous Phase
Reactions of Gases in Liquid-Water Clouds, in: Chemistry of Multiphase
Atmospheric Systems of Multiphase Atmospheric Systems, edited by: Jaeschke,
W., NATO ASI Series, Series G: Ecological Sciences, Berlin,
Heidelberg, Springer,  415–471, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70627-1_16" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70627-1_16</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, John
Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, ISBN 13 9780471178163, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Shahpoury et al.(2021)Shahpoury, Zhang, Arangio, Celo,
Dabek-Zlotorzynska, Harner, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>
Shahpoury, P., Zhang, Z. W., Arangio, A., Celo, V., Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E.,
Harner, T., and Nenes, A.: The influence of chemical composition, aerosol
acidity, and metal dissolution on the oxidative potential of fine particulate
matter and redox potential of the lung lining fluid, Environ.
Int., 148, 106343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106343</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Slade and Knopf(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Slade, J. H. and Knopf, D. A.: Heterogeneous OH oxidation of biomass burning
organic aerosol surrogate compounds: assessment of volatilisation products
and the role of OH concentration on the reactive uptake kinetics, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 5898–5915, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP44695F" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP44695F</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Smith et al.(2009)Smith, Kroll, Cappa, Che, Liu, Ahmed, Leone,
Worsnop, and Wilson</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. D., Kroll, J. H., Cappa, C. D., Che, D. L., Liu, C. L., Ahmed, M.,
Leone, S. R., Worsnop, D. R., and Wilson, K. R.: The heterogeneous reaction
of hydroxyl radicals with sub-micron squalane particles: a model system for
understanding the oxidative aging of ambient aerosols, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 3209–3222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3209-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3209-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Song et al.(2020)Song, Chen, Lu, Zou, Tan, Fuchs, Wiedensohler, Moon,
Heard, Baeza-Romero, Zheng, Wahner, Kiendler-Scharr, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Song, H., Chen, X., Lu, K., Zou, Q., Tan, Z., Fuchs, H., Wiedensohler, A.,
Moon, D. R., Heard, D. E., Baeza-Romero, M.-T., Zheng, M., Wahner, A.,
Kiendler-Scharr, A., and Zhang, Y.: Influence of aerosol copper on
HO<sub>2</sub> uptake: a novel parameterized equation, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 20, 15835–15850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15835-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15835-2020</a>,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Stadtler et al.(2018)Stadtler, Simpson, Schröder, Taraborrelli,
Bott, and Schultz</label><mixed-citation>
Stadtler, S., Simpson, D., Schröder, S., Taraborrelli, D., Bott, A., and Schultz, M.: Ozone impacts of gas–aerosol uptake in global chemistry transport models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3147–3171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3147-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3147-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Stohs and Bagchi(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Stohs, S. J. and Bagchi, D.: Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal
ions, Free Radical Bio. Med., 18, 321–336,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(94)00159-h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(94)00159-h</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Takahama et al.(2008)Takahama, Gilardoni, and Russell</label><mixed-citation>
Takahama, S., Gilardoni, S., and Russell, L. M.: Single-particle oxidation
state and morphology of atmospheric iron aerosols, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D22202,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009810" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009810</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Taketani et al.(2008)Taketani, Kanaya, and Akimoto</label><mixed-citation>
Taketani, F., Kanaya, Y., and Akimoto, H.: Kinetics of Heterogeneous Reactions
of HO<sub>2</sub> Radical at Ambient Concentration Levels with
(NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and NaCl Aerosol
Particles,  J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 2370–2377,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0769936" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0769936</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Taketani et al.(2012)Taketani, Kanaya, Pochanart, Liu, Li, Okuzawa,
Kawamura, Wang, and Akimoto</label><mixed-citation>
Taketani, F., Kanaya, Y., Pochanart, P., Liu, Y., Li, J., Okuzawa, K.,
Kawamura, K., Wang, Z., and Akimoto, H.: Measurement of overall uptake
coefficients for HO<sub>2</sub> radicals by aerosol particles sampled
from ambient air at Mts. Tai and Mang (China), Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 11907–11916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11907-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11907-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Tan et al.(2020)Tan, Hofzumahaus, Lu, Brown, Holland, Huey,
Kiendler-Scharr, Li, Liu, Ma, Min, Rohrer, Shao, Wahner, Wang, Wiedensohler,
Wu, Wu, Zeng, Zhang, and Fuchs</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, Z., Hofzumahaus, A., Lu, K., Brown, S. S., Holland, F., Huey, L. G.,
Kiendler-Scharr, A., Li, X., Liu, X., Ma, N., Min, K.-E., Rohrer, F., Shao,
M., Wahner, A., Wang, Y., Wiedensohler, A., Wu, Y., Wu, Z., Zeng, L., Zhang,
Y., and Fuchs, H.: No Evidence for a Significant Impact of Heterogeneous
Chemistry on Radical Concentrations in the North China Plain in Summer 2014,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 5973–5979,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00525" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00525</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Thornton and Abbatt(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Thornton, J. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Measurements of HO<sub>2</sub> uptake
to aqueous aerosol: Mass accommodation coefficients and net reactive loss,
J. Geophys. Res., 100, D08309,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005402" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005402</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Tilgner et al.(2013)Tilgner, Bräuer, Wolke, and
Herrmann</label><mixed-citation>
Tilgner, A., Bräuer, P., Wolke, R., and Herrmann, H.: Modelling
multiphase chemistry in deliquescent aerosols and clouds using CAPRAM3.0i,
J. Atmos. Chem., 70, 221–256,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-013-9267-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-013-9267-4</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Tong et al.(2016)Tong, Arangio, Lakey, Berkemeier, Liu, Kampf, Brune,
Pöschl, and Shiraiwa</label><mixed-citation>
Tong, H., Arangio, A. M., Lakey, P. S. J., Berkemeier, T., Liu, F., Kampf,
C. J., Brune, W. H., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.: Hydroxyl radicals
from secondary organic aerosol decomposition in water, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
16, 1761–1771, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1761-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1761-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Tong et al.(2017)Tong, Lakey, Arangio, Socorro, Kampf, Berkemeier,
Brune, Pöschl, and Shiraiwa</label><mixed-citation>
Tong, H., Lakey, P. S. J., Arangio, A. M., Socorro, J., Kampf, C. J.,
Berkemeier, T., Brune, W. H., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.: Reactive
oxygen species formed in aqueous mixtures of secondary organic aerosols and
mineral dust influencing cloud chemistry and public health in the
Anthropocene, Faraday Discuss., 200, 251–270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C7FD00023E" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C7FD00023E</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Tong et al.(2020)Tong, Liu, Filippi, Wilson, Arangio, Zhang, Yue,
Lelieveld, Shen, Keskinen, Li, Chen, Zhang, Hoffmann, Fu, Brune,
Petäjä, Kulmala, Yao, Berkemeier, Shiraiwa, and
Pöschl</label><mixed-citation>
Tong, H., Liu, F., Filippi, A., Wilson, J., Arangio, A. M., Zhang, Y., Yue, S., Lelieveld, S., Shen, F., Keskinen, H.-M. K., Li, J., Chen, H., Zhang, T., Hoffmann, T., Fu, P., Brune, W. H., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Yao, M., Berkemeier, T., Shiraiwa, M., and Pöschl, U.: Aqueous-phase reactive species formed by fine particulate matter from remote forests and polluted urban air, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10439–10455, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10439-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10439-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Verma et al.(2012)Verma, Rico-Martinez, Kotra, King, Liu, Snell, and
Weber</label><mixed-citation>
Verma, V., Rico-Martinez, R., Kotra, N., King, L., Liu, J., Snell, T. W., and
Weber, R. J.: Contribution of Water-Soluble and Insoluble Components and
Their Hydrophobic/Hydrophilic Subfractions to the Reactive Oxygen
Species-Generating Potential of Fine Ambient Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 11384–11392, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es302484r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es302484r</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Wang et al.(2015)Wang, Balkanski, Boucher, Bopp, Chappell, Ciais,
Hauglustaine, Peñuelas, and Tao</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, R., Balkanski, Y., Boucher, O., Bopp, L., Chappell, A., Ciais, P.,
Hauglustaine, D., Peñuelas, J., and Tao, S.: Sources, transport and
deposition of iron in the global atmosphere, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 6247–6270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6247-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6247-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Waring et al.(2011)Waring, King, Bagot, Costen, and
McKendrick</label><mixed-citation>
Waring, C., King, K. L., Bagot, P. A. J., Costen, M. L., and McKendrick, K. G.:
Collision dynamics and reactive uptake of OH radicals at liquid surfaces of
atmospheric interest, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 8457–8469,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP02734K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP02734K</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Wei et al.(2021)Wei, Fang, Wong, Lakey, Nizkorodov, and
Shiraiwa</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, J., Fang, T., Wong, C., Lakey, P. S. J., Nizkorodov, S. A., and Shiraiwa,
M.: Superoxide Formation from Aqueous Reactions of Biogenic Secondary
Organic Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 260–270,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07789" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07789</a>, 2021.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Xuan et al.(2020)Xuan, Chen, Gong, Shen, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>
Xuan, X., Chen, Z., Gong, Y., Shen, H., and Chen, S.: Partitioning of hydrogen
peroxide in gas-liquid and gas-aerosol phases, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 20, 5513–5526, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5513-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5513-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Zhang et al.(2014)Zhang, Bi, Lou, Li, Wang, Wang, Zhou, Sheng, Fu,
and Chen</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, G., Bi, X., Lou, S., Li, L., Wang, H., Wang, X., Zhou, Z., Sheng, G.,
Fu, J., and Chen, C.: Source and mixing state of iron-containing particles
in Shanghai by individual particle analysis, Chemosphere, 95, 9–16,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.046</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Zhou et al.(2020)Zhou, Murano, Kohno, Sakamoto, and Kajii</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, J., Murano, K., Kohno, N., Sakamoto, Y., and Kajii, Y.: Real-time
quantification of the total HO<sub>2</sub> reactivity of ambient air and HO<sub>2</sub> uptake
kinetics onto ambient aerosols in Kyoto (Japan), Atmos. Environ.,
223, 117189, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117189" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117189</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Zhou et al.(2021)Zhou, Sato, Bai, Fukusaki, Kousa, Ramasamy, Takami,
Yoshino, Nakayama, Sadanaga, Nakashima, Li, Murano, Kohno, Sakamoto, and
Kajii</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, J., Sato, K., Bai, Y., Fukusaki, Y., Kousa, Y., Ramasamy, S., Takami, A., Yoshino, A., Nakayama, T., Sadanaga, Y., Nakashima, Y., Li, J., Murano, K., Kohno, N., Sakamoto, Y., and Kajii, Y.: Kinetics and impacting factors of HO<sub>2</sub> uptake onto submicron atmospheric aerosols during the 2019 Air QUAlity Study (AQUAS) in Yokohama, Japan , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12243–12260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12243-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12243-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
