<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-15135-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Enhanced sulfur in the upper troposphere and <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> lower
stratosphere in spring 2020</article-title><alt-title>Enhanced sulfur in the UTLS in spring 2020</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Enhanced sulfur in the UTLS in spring 2020}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L. Tomsche et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Tomsche</surname><given-names>Laura</given-names></name>
          <email>ltomsche@uni-mainz.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Marsing</surname><given-names>Andreas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5006-2133</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jurkat-Witschas</surname><given-names>Tina</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff5">
          <name><surname>Lucke</surname><given-names>Johannes</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-864X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kaufmann</surname><given-names>Stefan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-1996</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Kaiser</surname><given-names>Katharina</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3162-2502</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Schneider</surname><given-names>Johannes</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7169-3973</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Scheibe</surname><given-names>Monika</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schlager</surname><given-names>Hans</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Röder</surname><given-names>Lenard</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-009X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Fischer</surname><given-names>Horst</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Obersteiner</surname><given-names>Florian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-8893</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Zahn</surname><given-names>Andreas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Zöger</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8291-345X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Lelieveld</surname><given-names>Jos</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6307-3846</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Voigt</surname><given-names>Christiane</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-7731</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> 82234 Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629
Delft, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Flight Experiments, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), 82234 Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Laura Tomsche (ltomsche@uni-mainz.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>November</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>15135</fpage><lpage>15151</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>April</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>April</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>October</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>October</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e258">Sulfur compounds in the upper troposphere and lower
stratosphere (UTLS) impact the atmosphere radiation budget, either directly
as particles or indirectly as precursor gas for new particle formation. In
situ measurements in the UTLS are rare but are important to better
understand the impact of the sulfur budget on climate. The BLUESKY mission
in May and June 2020 explored an unprecedented situation. (1) The UTLS
experienced extraordinary dry conditions in spring 2020 over Europe, in
comparison to previous years, and (2) the first lockdown of the COVID-19
pandemic caused major emission reductions from industry, ground, and airborne transportation. With the two research aircraft <italic>HALO</italic> and <italic>Falcon</italic>, 20
flights were conducted over central Europe and the North Atlantic to investigate the atmospheric composition with respect to trace gases,
aerosol, and clouds. Here, we focus on measurements of sulfur dioxide (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and particulate sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the altitude range
of 8 to 14.5 km which show unexpectedly enhanced mixing ratios of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the upper troposphere and of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the lowermost
stratosphere. In the UT, we find SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb, caused by the remaining air traffic, and reduced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks
due to low OH and low cloud fractions and to a minor extent by uplift from
boundary layer sources. Particulate sulfate showed elevated mixing ratios of
up to 0.33 ppb in the LS. We suggest that the eruption of the volcano
Raikoke in June 2019, which emitted about 1 Tg SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into the
stratosphere in northern midlatitudes, caused these enhancements, in addition
to Siberian and Canadian wildfires and other minor volcanic eruptions. Our
measurements can help to test models and lead to new insights in the
distribution of sulfur compounds in the UTLS, their sources, and sinks.
Moreover, these results can contribute to improving simulations of the
radiation budget in the UTLS with respect to sulfur effects.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e364">The stratospheric aerosol layer changes over time. The aerosol layer becomes more pronounced after volcanic eruptions, with plume injection high into the stratosphere (Kremser et al., 2016). It plays a role in the radiative balance and thus impacts the climate (Solomon et al.,
2011). An enhanced aerosol concentration leads to a larger albedo. The
geoengineering community investigates the enhancement of the aerosol layer
with injections of sulfur compounds into the stratosphere to partly
counteract greenhouse gases related global warming (Crutzen, 2006;
Schäfer et al.,
2015). The stratospheric aerosol layer is often referred to as the “Junge
layer” and can extend from the tropopause up to 25 km (Junge et al.,
1961). The chemical composition of the stratospheric aerosol layer is
dominated by sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) particles, which consist mainly of
pure sulfuric acid droplets, sulfuric acid with material from ablated
meteoroids, or mixed organic–sulfate particles (Murphy et al., 2014;
Cziczo et al., 2001; Schneider et al., 2021). During
volcanic quiescent periods, precursor gases, like carbonyl sulfide (OCS),
and non-volcanic sulfur dioxide (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), as well as tropospheric
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles, preserve the stratospheric layer (Brock et al.,
1995). Due to its long lifetime, OCS is vertically uplifted from the
tropics into the stratosphere, and there it converts mostly through
photodissociation to SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sheng et al., 2015). The
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry and transport depends strongly on the ambient conditions.
In the free troposphere and lower stratosphere, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reacts
predominantly with hydroxyl (OH) to form sulfuric acid (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (English
et al., 2011; Stockwell and Calvert, 1983); thus, the lifetime correlates with the OH concentration. At cold temperatures
and in the presence of water vapor, the gaseous H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> condenses
quickly to particles
(Almeida
et al., 2013; Kirkby
et al., 2011), thereby forming sulfate aerosol. In
the boundary layer, pollution could significantly reduce the lifetime to
hours (Lee et al., 2011) and, consequently, also the
transport of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to higher altitudes. Clouds could also limit the
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime to hours or days (Lelieveld, 1993), as the
conversion of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is faster in cloud droplets than
in the gas phase (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006). Nevertheless, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
transported from the planetary boundary layer (PBL) into the UTLS region via
different pathways. Similar to OCS, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be vertically transported
across the tropical tropopause layer (TTL) or by overshooting convection in
the tropics (Fueglistaler et al., 2009) or by the
transport of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in a warm conveyor belt (WCB) in the midlatitudes
(Arnold et al., 1997; Clarisse et al., 2011;
Fiedler et al., 2009) or by transport processes connected
with the Asian monsoon (Gottschaldt et al., 2017,
2018; Ploeger et al., 2017; Tomsche et al., 2019; Vogel et al., 2019; von
Hobe et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e544">An explosive volcanic eruption can inject huge amounts of ash, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
other volcanic gases into the stratosphere and thus enhance the
stratospheric aerosol layer (Kremser et al., 2016).
In 1991, the volcano Mount Pinatubo (15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) emitted approximately
20 Tg of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 30 Tg of aerosol (McCormick et al., 1995), which
impacted the stratosphere globally. Volcanic eruptions in midlatitudes can
also impact the stratosphere, e.g., Mount St. Helens (46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 0.8 Tg SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in 1980, but its impact vanished in about a year (Deshler et al.,
2006). One recent midlatitude eruption of similar strength
was the volcano Raikoke in June 2019 (48.28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, Kloss et al.,
2021; de Leeuw et al., 2021), which
emitted approx. 1.4–1.6 Tg SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. A further important source of
stratospheric aerosol is intense wildfires, which can potentially develop
pyrocumulonimbus (pyroCb) and thus transport biomass burning emissions into
the UTLS (Fromm et al., 2005; Peterson et al., 2018).
Moreover, air traffic is another source of particles and precursor gases in
the UTLS (Lee et al., 2010; Voigt et al., 2010; Jurkat et
al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e611">In late spring 2020, the UTLS region was probed over Europe during the
BLUESKY mission, the period covered the first weeks of the coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown in Europe, which caused reductions in
emissions from industry, ground, and especially airborne transportation
(Voigt et al., 2022). Under these conditions, we found enhanced values of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere (UT) and of particulate SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the lowermost stratosphere (LS), which motivated us to investigate these
sulfur compounds with respect to their sources and sinks.</p>
      <p id="d1e638">In the following, we first present the BLUESKY mission in Sect. 2. In
Sect. 3.1 we introduce the airborne measurements and in Sect. 3.2 the
trace gas and particulate profiles obtained during BLUESKY and also show
tropospherically and stratospherically influenced compounds in tracer–tracer
correlations (Sect. 3.3). Afterwards, we focus on the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profile in
the UT (Sect. 4) and continue in Sect. 5 with the stratospheric sulfate
aerosol. Finally, we summarize our results and give an outlook in Sect. 6.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>BLUESKY mission</title>
      <p id="d1e665">The BLUESKY mission was led by the German Aerospace Center (DLR) and the
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz. Coordinated flights were
performed from Oberpfaffenhofen with the High Altitude and Long Range
Research Aircraft <italic>HALO</italic> and the DLR <italic>Falcon</italic> over Europe and the North Atlantic
between 16 May and 9 June 2020. In total 20 flights were performed (Fig. 1). The period covered the first weeks of the COVID-19 lockdown in Europe
and thus offered a unique opportunity to investigate an unprecedented
situation of reduced anthropogenic emissions from industry, ground, and airborne transportation. The goal of BLUESKY was to explore the changes in
the atmospheric composition and gain new insights on how anthropogenic
emissions perturb chemical and physical processes in the atmosphere. Both
aircraft were equipped with in situ instruments to investigate trace gases,
aerosols, and cloud properties. The payload of both aircraft was complementary to obtain a comprehensive data set. In particular, during five
days with coordinated flights over Germany (23, 26, and 28 May) and
over the North Atlantic (30 May, 2 June), the payload offered the
opportunity to probe the air masses in more detail. An overview of the
BLUESKY mission is given in Voigt et al. (2022), and further detailed studies are published by Schumann et al. (2021a, b), Reifenberg et al. (2022),
Nussbaumer et al. (2022), Hamryszczak
et al. (2022), and Krüger et al. (2022). In
the present study we will focus on the sulfur compounds in the upper
troposphere and lower stratosphere.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e676">Overview of all flight tracks performed by <italic>Falcon</italic> (red) and <italic>HALO</italic>
(blue) during the BLUESKY mission in May and June 2020 during the COVID-19
lockdown. Coordinated flights (<italic>Falcon</italic>: orange; <italic>HALO</italic>: cyan) were performed
over Germany on 23, 26, and 28 May and twice (30 May and 2 June) as
both aircraft headed towards the North Atlantic, west of Ireland.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/15135/2022/acp-22-15135-2022-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d1e705">In the present study several trace gas measurements on board <italic>Falcon</italic> and also
trace gas and particle measurements on board <italic>HALO</italic> are used. On board <italic>Falcon</italic>,
the atmospheric chemical ionization mass spectrometer AIMS measures gaseous
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and nitric acid (HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) among other compounds at mixing ratios
relevant for the UTLS region by using SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as reagent ion. A more
detailed description of the instrument can be found elsewhere (Voigt et al.,
2014; Jurkat et al., 2016; Marsing et al.,
2019). SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is calibrated in-flight using an
isotopically labeled calibration gas mixture of the isotope
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is heavier than the naturally dominant isotope
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> but has the same chemical behavior (Jurkat et al.,
2016). The natural isotopic ratio is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0454, and the mass spectrometer can detect both isotopes separately as they differ in mass by 2 amu (atomic mass units). This has the advantage that the calibration gas can be continuously added to the sampling flow and
the system is well conditioned for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. A drawback is that the
background of the instrument is increased by 5 %, due to impurities of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the calibration gas. The SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data are corrected for the instrumental background, which includes a moisture correction, as higher water vapor concentrations lead to cross sensitivities on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> amu
(FSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Jurkat et al., 2016). With increasing moisture in lower
altitudes, a correction is more difficult and reduces the data quality. As
the focus of the present study is the UTLS region, we limited our analysis
on altitudes above 8 km and thus ensure the data quality. The other trace
gas measured by AIMS is HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is in-flight calibrated using a
permeation oven with a solution of HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in water (Jurkat
et al., 2014). The data are background corrected including a
moisture correction, which is necessary to account for cross sensitivities
caused by water vapor (Jurkat et al., 2016). The AIMS measurements were
performed with a 1.6 s time resolution and smoothed with a running mean of
20 s. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detection limit of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varied between
0.006–0.017 ppb. The total uncertainty is on average 22.7 % for
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and included the uncertainty of the moisture correction. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detection limit for HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is in the range of 0.005–0.009 ppb. The HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> total uncertainty is on average 16 % (Marsing, 2021).
Further measurements on board <italic>Falcon</italic> included CO and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
measured using a UV photometer (Schulte and Schlager, 1996; Ziereis
et al., 2000), CO was measured by cavity ring-down
spectroscopy (Klausner et al., 2020). The accuracies for CO
and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are 15 % and 5 %, respectively. Additionally, water vapor
(H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) was measured with the Lyman-alpha absorption instrument
integrated in the meteorological sensor system.</p>
      <p id="d1e1000">On board <italic>HALO</italic>, the compact time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer
(C-ToF-AMS) measured the aerosol composition (Drewnick et al.,
2005; Schmale et al., 2010; Schulz et
al., 2018). Aerosol particles
of approximately 50 to 800 nm are analyzed, which then provides quantitative
mass concentrations of organic matter, sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium. The instrument is equipped with a constant pressure inlet that ensures a steady
mass flow and an operation pressure of the aerodynamic lens for stable
in-flight operation (Molleker et al., 2020). Here,
we focus on sulfate. For a better comparability of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, we calculate mixing ratios (ppb) instead of using concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Additionally, mixing ratios have the advantage of
being pressure independent. We assumed that all SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would be
evaporated and calculated the volumetric mixing ratio for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Above 8 km, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detection limit is (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb
for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the accuracy is 30 %, and the precision on average is
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb (Schulz et al., 2018). Additionally, the trace
gases CO and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on board <italic>HALO</italic> are considered in the present study for
altitudes above 8 km. CO was measured by the TRacer In Situ TDLAS for
Atmospheric Research (TRISTAR; Schiller et al., 2008) with a
total uncertainty of 3 % for tropospheric measurements (Nussbaumer et
al., 2022). Note that due to a small nitrous oxide (N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) interference
the uncertainty in the lower stratosphere is higher (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv).
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured by the Fast Airborne Ozone instrument FAIRO, which
combines the technique of a UV photometer and a chemiluminescence detector
(Zahn et al., 2012), and the total uncertainty of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
was 2 %–2.5 %. Water vapor was measured with the tunable diode laser (TDL)
hygrometer SHARC (Sophisticated Hygrometer for Atmospheric ResearCh).</p>
      <p id="d1e1182">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was sampled on board <italic>Falcon</italic>, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was probed on board
<italic>HALO</italic>. Nevertheless, campaign averaged CO and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles from both
aircraft agree and motivate the combined interpretation of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions during spring 2020 (see Sect. 3.2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Trajectory calculations</title>
      <p id="d1e1257">Back-trajectory calculations were performed using the HYSPLIT atmospheric
transport and dispersion model (Stein et al., 2015;
Rolph et al., 2017) with the GDAS (Global Data Assimilation System)
meteorological data set (Kanamitsu, 1989). For selected cases with
either elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios, 360 h back-trajectory ensembles were calculated. One ensemble consists of 27 single
trajectories, which are offset by one meteorological grid point in the
horizontal and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the vertical coordinate. With the help of the back trajectories, air mass origins and transport pathways in the atmosphere
could be identified.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Trace gases along flight track</title>
      <p id="d1e1310">On 2 June 2020, <italic>HALO</italic> and <italic>Falcon</italic> took off in Oberpfaffenhofen and headed
towards the North Atlantic, west of Ireland, with similar flight tracks,
altitude, and similar takeoff time. With a shorter flight range, <italic>Falcon</italic>
landed in Shannon, Ireland, to refuel, while <italic>HALO</italic> continued its flight. In
Fig. 2, flight altitude and in situ measurements are plotted against
longitude for comparability from both aircraft for the time between 07:00 and
10:00 UTC. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO were measured aboard both aircraft. Both trace
gases show similar patterns independent of the aircraft. The highest O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratios with maxima of 475 ppb (<italic>Falcon</italic>) and 423 ppb (<italic>HALO</italic>) were
approximately between 6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, while CO had the
lowest mixing ratios of 18 ppb (<italic>Falcon</italic>) and 28 ppb (<italic>HALO</italic>). Along the longitudes outside of the pervious mentioned range, the trace gases showed an opposite behaviour: when CO mixing ratios were enhanced with maxima of 110 ppb (<italic>Falcon</italic>) and 109 ppb (<italic>HALO</italic>), O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were low (<italic>Falcon</italic>: 74 ppb; <italic>HALO</italic>: 62 ppb). Because CO and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from both
platforms agree within their uncertainties and reflect the same trends, we
assume that both aircraft probed the same air mass. Between 6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W
and 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are positively correlated, as
expected, and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios increase up to 1.6 ppb. A similar
trend can be observed in the particulate compound SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
also is enhanced when O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, as a stratospheric tracer, is enhanced.
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from the detection limit to 0.21 ppb. SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios show a larger variability, but in general they follow CO, which is a tropospheric tracer (Fischer et al.,
2000; Hoor et al., 2002). SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from the detection limit to
0.15 ppb and experiences one short peak with 0.15 ppb around 6.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W at an altitude of 11.9 km. Other trace gases on board <italic>Falcon</italic> measured
266 ppb O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 70 ppb CO, and 0.8 ppb HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during this event, but
beside HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which increased slightly, CO and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> showed no
perturbations around this location. An in-depth analysis and discussion on
potential explanations for this or similar features is presented in Sect. 4.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1560">On 2 June 2020, <italic>HALO</italic> and <italic>Falcon</italic> had similar flight tracks from
Oberpfaffenhofen towards the North Atlantic, west of Ireland. The sampling
was roughly between 07:00–10:00 UTC. Plotted are <bold>(a)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(c)</bold> CO, <bold>(d)</bold> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e)</bold> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(f)</bold> altitude across longitudes
15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/15135/2022/acp-22-15135-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{SO${}_{{2}}$ and SO${}_{{4}}{}^{{2-}}$ median profiles}?><title>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> median profiles</title>
      <p id="d1e1688">Following the case mentioned above, we broaden our analysis to all flights
of the whole campaign. In Fig. 3, median, 25th percentile, and 75th
percentile profiles of the trace gases and the particulate compounds are
displayed with the potential temperature as a vertical axis. The medians,
25th percentiles, and 75th percentiles are calculated for 5 K potential
temperature bins from 310 to 355 K for <italic>Falcon</italic> flights and up to 385 K for
<italic>HALO</italic> flights. The <italic>Falcon</italic> profile is limited in height due to the maximum
flight altitude of approx. 12.5 km in comparison to <italic>HALO</italic> with a ceiling
altitude of 14.5 km. First, we compare the trace gases measured on both
aircraft, <italic>Falcon</italic> and <italic>HALO</italic>. The stratospheric tracer O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> behaves similarly
for both aircraft within the 25th and 75th percentiles with a step
around 340 K, while the spread between the percentiles starts to increase
already around 330 K. Below this altitude, median O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios
reach minima of 41 ppb (<italic>Falcon</italic>) and 62 ppb (<italic>HALO</italic>), and above they rise up to
420 ppb (<italic>Falcon</italic>) and 642 ppb (<italic>HALO</italic>). The chemical tropopause is marked by
strong gradients in several tracers. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a common indicator shows a
kink in its median profile at around 140 ppb and 340 K potential
temperature, which is within the limits given by Thouret et al. (2006). The dynamical tropopause,
displayed as the 2 PVU based on ECMWF/ERA5 data along the <italic>Falcon</italic> flight
tracks (Fig. 3), is around 335 K and thus has a similar height to the
chemical tropopause. The tropospheric tracer CO from both platforms has
similar profiles with median mixing ratios of 37–112 ppb (<italic>Falcon</italic>) and
12–96 ppb (<italic>HALO</italic>). Both CO profiles show a decrease with height and are thus
anticorrelated to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, but they reflect a significant change in the
mixing ratios at 340 K, similar to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The profiles of the tropospheric
tracer H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O also decrease with height, following the CO profile, but
with a less pronounced step around the chemical tropopause. The H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
mixing ratios are 26–268 ppm (<italic>Falcon</italic>) and 3–153 ppm (<italic>HALO</italic>). Additionally,
the median HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profile follows the trend of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with low mixing
ratios down to 0.3 ppb followed by a steep increase around 340 K and reaches
a maximum of 1.4 ppb. Between 330 and 350 K, the stratospheric tracers
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as the tropospheric tracer CO show larger
variations between the percentiles, which indicates the mixing layer
described by Hoor et al. (2002) over the course of the mission. As shown,
the profiles for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO for <italic>HALO</italic> and <italic>Falcon</italic> flight tracks agree well
within their 25th and 75th percentiles. Both aircraft probed the
atmosphere above Europe and the North Atlantic within the mission period and
thus during similar meteorological conditions, even though the days and
routes partly differ. This gives us confidence to further investigate and
compare measurements of sulfur compounds sampled on both aircraft: SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
was sampled on <italic>Falcon</italic>, while SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was probed on <italic>HALO</italic>. Profiles of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. 3a and b, respectively. The
median SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profile decreases with height and median values range from
0.05 to 0.08 ppb, with the lowest mixing ratios above 330 K. The opposite
behavior can be observed in the median SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile, which
increases with height. The mixing ratios are lowest at 0.02 ppb and rise up
to 0.33 ppb. The profile shows a similar trend in comparison to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with
a stepwise increase around 340 K. The enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios
above the chemical tropopause can be associated with stratospheric sulfate
aerosol.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1960">Median profiles with 25th and 75th percentiles as shaded
areas are shown for trace gases with the potential temperature as vertical
axes. The data are calculated for 5 K potential temperature bins. <bold>(a)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, <bold>(d)</bold> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e)</bold> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(f)</bold> CO, and <bold>(g)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O for
measurements performed on <italic>HALO</italic> and <italic>Falcon</italic>. Additionally, the black line at
335 K roughly indicates the dynamical tropopause (as 2 PVU) based on
ECMWF/ERA5 analysis along the <italic>Falcon</italic> flight tracks.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/15135/2022/acp-22-15135-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2091">In Fig. 3c the profile of the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is plotted. The ratio is a measure of the relative
contribution from the precursor SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the total sulfur budget. Below
the chemical tropopause most of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is still present as SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
while above the tropopause SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominates the ratio. The sum of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the median profiles is rather stable around
0.10 ppb between 310 and 340 K; above the chemical tropopause the sum
increases up to on average 0.20 ppb and is dominated by the enhancement of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the range 340–355 K. In the next section we will discuss
potential sources explaining the distribution of sulfur compounds in the
UTLS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Stratospherically and tropospherically influenced air masses</title>
      <p id="d1e2223">In order to obtain an overview on the distribution of sulfur compounds with
respect to the chemical tropopause, Fig. 4 shows tracer–tracer correlations
of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, comparable to previous studies investigating
the cross-tropopause exchange and the chemical composition of the tropopause
(Fischer et al., 2000; Hoor et al., 2002). In contrast to the median
profiles in the previous section, here all available data are plotted,
either for <italic>HALO</italic> (considering SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or for <italic>Falcon</italic> (considering
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). In the correlation plot between O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO color-coded with
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4a) from <italic>HALO</italic> for the whole altitude range (0–14 km),
the stratospheric branch is visible with low CO and high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values,
while the tropospheric branch is characterized by low O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and high CO
values, similar to, e.g., Fischer et al. (2000). The transition layer is
clearly visible; the layer is a mixing layer, influenced by air masses with
stratospheric and tropospheric origin (Hoor et al., 2002). Without the
exchange processes across the tropopause, we would expect an L-shape profile
(Fischer at al., 2000). The mixing layer almost extends over the whole
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> range from 150 to 400 ppb, similar to other mixing layers in the
same latitude and season (Hoor et al., 2002; Pan et al.,
2004), and is thicker in comparison to a winter polar mixing layer (Fischer et
al., 2000). The higher SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios are either in the
(unmixed) stratospheric branch or partly mixed into in the upper part of the
transition layer. With respect to the chemical tropopause, the elevated
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios appear only in the stratosphere (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 ppb; Thouret et al., 2006). In Fig. 4b the correlation
between O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO with and without color-coded SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on board <italic>Falcon</italic>
is displayed. A subset of the <italic>Falcon</italic> flights is missing there due to missing
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data in the beginning of the campaign. As the <italic>Falcon</italic> mainly operated
up to 12 km, the pure stratospheric branch is hard to identify, while the
tropospheric branch is clearly identifiable with the black dots (without
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, within the mixing layer, the stratospheric and
tropospheric influences still differ, which is reflected in the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratios. In order to cover all <italic>Falcon</italic> flights, we use here HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
as a stratospheric tracer. In Fig. 4c, the HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to CO correlation for
the measurements on board <italic>Falcon</italic> is plotted with color-coded SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Fig. 4c includes all <italic>Falcon</italic> flights; Fig. 4b and c show similar patterns
for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, with higher mixing ratios towards more tropospheric influence
and lower mixing ratios when the stratospheric influence dominates. One
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> outlier with higher mixing ratios at enhanced HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and reduced
CO can be identified (Fig. 4c; grey circle). A possible explanation could be
(aged) aircraft plume encounters (as observed, e.g., in Jurkat et
al., 2011), as HYSPLIT back-trajectory calculations tend towards long-range
transport in the UTLS region for this case (Fig. 5a/b). Generally, the
trajectories do not indicate transport from local PBL sources for cases with
elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Fig. 5a–h, examples for cases with elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
are shown, including the case on 2 June 2020 described in Sect. 3.1 (Fig. 5g/h). Additionally, Hamryszczak et al. (2022) found that hydrogen peroxides were scavenged by clouds during BLUESKY in the lower and middle troposphere
(0–7 km). As SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can easily be scavenged by clouds (Seinfeld and
Pandis, 2006), the potential for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> being transported from the local
PBL to the UT seems unlikely. The tracer–tracer correlation and the relative
distribution of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> along the transition layer show no direct link to
the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution, as they are in different regimes; thus, we
assume that they originate from different sources. The back trajectories of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases support the assumption that the origins
differ, especially concerning the different altitude ranges of the
trajectories (Fig. 5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2583">Tracer–tracer correlation for <bold>(a)</bold> 30 s data CO–O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in black
for the whole altitude range and for heights above 8 km, with SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
color-coded from <italic>HALO</italic> flights; <bold>(b)</bold> CO–O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in black for the whole altitude
range and with color-coded SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (above 8 km) from <italic>Falcon</italic> flights, when
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was available; and <bold>(c)</bold> 1 s data CO–HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with color-coded
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from <italic>Falcon</italic> flights. In panel <bold>(c)</bold> a grey circle marks an outlier with high SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/15135/2022/acp-22-15135-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2704">HYSPLIT 360 h back trajectories calculated for cases with
elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<bold>a–h</bold>; <italic>Falcon</italic>) and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<bold>i–p</bold>; <italic>HALO</italic>) mixing ratios. The release points started in the vicinity of these events. Left column: the flight tracks are in black, and the potential
temperature along the trajectories to indicate the transport altitude is color-coded. The
right column represents the trajectories as hours before release vs.
altitude, also with color-coded potential temperature. The cases of enhanced
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were on 19 May 2020 <bold>(a, b)</bold>, 23 May 2020 <bold>(c, d)</bold>, 30 May 2020 <bold>(e, f)</bold>,
and 2 June 2020 <bold>(g, h)</bold>. The cases of elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were on 23 May 2020 <bold>(i, j)</bold>, 26 May 2020 <bold>(k, l)</bold>, 30 May 2020 <bold>(m, n)</bold>, and 2 June 2020 <bold>(o, p)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/15135/2022/acp-22-15135-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Enhanced SO${}_{{2}}$ in the UT}?><title>Enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT</title>
      <p id="d1e2818">In Fig. 6a, the median SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profile with shaded 25th and
75th percentiles is plotted against the flight altitude, in order to
compare the data with literature values. The SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> percentiles are
calculated for 500 m bins. Similar to Fig. 3b, the median SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases
with height from around 0.08 to 0.04 ppb. Previous in situ SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements at similar flight altitudes are included in Fig. 6a. Overall,
the BLUESKY SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements are within the range of previous airborne
studies, even though all studies are snapshots of the atmosphere of
different locations on the Northern Hemisphere, different seasons, and
different meteorological situations. Keeping this in mind, we will have a
closer look. Williamson et al. (2021) reported low mixing ratios
for the remote northern-hemispheric background over the Pacific for the
upper troposphere as well as for the lowermost stratosphere during the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom; 2016–2018). Speidel et al. (2007) reported higher
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the upper-tropospheric background over Europe and the
eastern Atlantic in summer 2004. Jurkat et al. (2010) measured
the stratospheric background over Europe in autumn 2008 in a similar range
to Speidel et al. (2007). Above 12 km the BLUESKY SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios agree well with the stratospheric background from Jurkat et al. (2010) and the tropospheric background from Speidel et al. (2007). Surprisingly, the BLUESKY SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profile slightly exceeds the previous measurements below these altitudes in the upper troposphere. The
upper-tropospheric SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profile compares better to SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios, which were associated with the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> background in the North
Atlantic flight corridor in 1997 or 2010 (Arnold et al., 1997;
Jurkat et al., 2010). Arnold et al. (1997) reported SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios
in the range of 0.03–0.3 ppb in October 1993 during POLINAT (Pollution from aircraft emissions in the North Atlantic flight corridor) and Jurkat et
al. (2010) measured 0.09 ppb of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during CONCERT in autumn 2008. Due
to implementation of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission control policies, the global SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions decreased since 1980
(Hoesly et al., 2018; Aas et al., 2019); nevertheless, the sulfur
content in kerosene remained unchanged (Lee et al., 2021; Miller et al.,
2009); thus, the aviation-based SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions depend on the air traffic.</p>
      <p id="d1e2967">In 2020, a 72 % reduction of the air traffic above Europe has been
reported due to the COVID-19 lockdown in comparison to the same time period
in 2019 (Schumann et al., 2021a, b), hence providing a lower aviation
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source with respect to 2019. Compared to 2010, the 3.5 % increase
in air traffic per year (Lee et al., 2011) promotes an increase by a factor
of 1.5 of the 2010 air traffic for a scenario without COVID-19 restrictions
in 2020 and consequently a theoretical increase of 50 % in aviation
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions for 2020, given that the sulfur content of the kerosene
is unchanged (Lee et al., 2021; Miller et al., 2009). In
2020, the remaining air traffic of 28 % (in comparison to 2019)
corresponds to roughly 40 % of the 2010 air traffic and might hence in
part explain the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing rations detected in the upper troposphere,
which are still higher than remote background measurements (Williamson et
al., 2021).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2999">Profiles for <bold>(a)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 500 m altitude
bins. In panel <bold>(a)</bold> additional literature SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are shown, while in panel <bold>(b)</bold> literature values for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are added, including SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profiles from previous <italic>HALO</italic> missions with the aerosol mass spectrometer
C-ToF-AMS on board: EMeRGe-EU in June/July 2017 (Andrés Hernández et
al., 2022) and four flights over Europe of the CAFE-Africa mission in
July–September 2018. Full markers are tropospheric origin and open markers
are stratospheric origin. Additionally, the dynamical tropopause
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 PVU) along the <italic>Falcon</italic> tracks is marked as a red horizontal
line in panel <bold>(a)</bold>, and the thermal tropopause is marked as a blue horizontal line for
<italic>HALO</italic> tracks and in grey for CAFE-Africa in panel <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/15135/2022/acp-22-15135-2022-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3108">In addition, further sources could have contributed to the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget
in the upper troposphere. To analyze the origin of air masses with elevated
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HYSPLIT back trajectories are calculated and representative
examples are plotted in Fig. 5a–h. SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from anthropogenic and
natural sources in the PBL can be lifted to the UT via convection or via
warm conveyor belts and transported to the measurement region. Arnold et al. (1997) reported an extended layer of enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with maxima of up to
3 ppb in the northeast Atlantic, which was an air mass uplifted and
transported from the polluted PBL from the eastern United States. A few
cases show trajectories with similar pathways, like the example in Fig. 5e/f. Nevertheless, the PBL contacts are also over the Pacific and East
Asia. The latter one suits better to the findings of Fiedler et al. (2009),
who observed the uplift of polluted air masses from East Asia via warm
conveyor belts and upper-tropospheric long-range transport towards Europe.
Further, the Asian monsoon also serves as a vertical transport pathway for
emissions from the PBL up to high altitudes, where the air mass can enter
the LS and horizontally be transported either eastwards (Vogel et al., 2014, 2016) or can be horizontally
transported in the UT (Tomsche et al., 2019) and finally reach Europe.
Similar trajectory pathways can be found for the cases in Fig. 5a/b and
5g/h. These trajectories indicate long-range transport in the UT and could
have been impacted by the Asian monsoon. Generally, the trajectories with
elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5a–h) show lower potential temperatures in
comparison to the trajectories calculated for elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5i–p). Hence, long-range transport of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-enriched PBL air masses could
have contributed to the observed BLUESKY SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the UT.
In contrast, the trajectories do not indicate local transport from the
central European PBL to the UT; hence, the transport of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
wildfires in Germany in May 2020 (European Commission et al.,
2021) to the UT seems negligible. Even if the transport of the smoke was via
self-lofting (Ohneiser et al., 2021), i.e., absorption of sunlight leads to
warming of the ambient air and thus lifting of the smoke, the transport is
slow and so SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> might have already been transformed to SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
before reaching the UTLS and does not contribute to the elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the UT. Moreover, the decrease of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the LS, as expected, does not
support transport of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> beyond the UT into the LS either via
convection or via warm conveyor belts. This can be confirmed by the
trajectories for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as they indicate long-range transport at
high altitudes with negligible influence from lower altitudes. The
trajectories helped identify potential source regions of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3275">Beside the sources, also sinks of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can alter the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in the UTLS. Beside the conversion to H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
leading to sulfate particles, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is removed from the atmosphere by wet
and dry deposition. SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be scavenged by clouds, which lead to a
significant reduction of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime (Lelieveld, 1993). Van
Heerwaarden et al. (2021) investigated the meteorological
situation in spring 2020 and found that a stable high-pressure system over
Europe led to a lower cloud fraction in comparison to the mean 2010–2019
period over Europe. This would lead to less cloud processing and reduce
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks. Furthermore, elevated humidity favors the faster conversion
of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and sulfate, as water vapor enhances the potential
for elevated OH concentrations (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006). As reported by
Schumann et al. (2021a, b) the UTLS was drier in spring 2020 in Europe
in comparison to previous years. The median H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O profiles during BLUESKY
reach only mixing ratios of up to 268 ppm in the upper troposphere (Fig. 3g), which is still within the range of typical springtime H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O mixing
ratios in the upper troposphere (e.g., Hegglin et al., 2009;
Kaufmann et al., 2018). But van Heerwaarden et al. (2021) found with respect to humidity and cloud cover that spring 2020 was amongst the springs with the lowest values. Thus, the lower
available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O led to lower OH concentrations during the BLUESKY period,
which implies less chemical processing and hence a reduction of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
sinks. Less SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks could lead to an enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime in
the UTLS and thus higher SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios.</p>
      <p id="d1e3433">In sum, the enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios at cruise levels in Europe in
spring 2020 can possibly be explained by a non-negligible aviation SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
contribution, WCB, or convective transport from the boundary layer, followed
by long-range transport and the prolonged SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime caused by the
unusually dry UTLS conditions. Neither the sources nor the sinks could
separately explain the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the UTLS. Beyond that, we
are not able to analyze in more detail the different amounts of the
aforementioned factors and how they contribute to single flights.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Stratospheric sulfate aerosol</title>
      <p id="d1e3481">As mentioned in Sect. 3.2, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a distinct profile with a
steep increase at a potential temperature of 340 K, which refers here to
around 11 km with respect to altitude (Fig. 6b). This altitude reflects also
the thermal tropopause height during BLUESKY (Fig. 6b). Up to this altitude,
the mixing ratio is rather constant, and then it increases. Between 8–11 km
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios are stable, and above O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases. The O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratio above 120 ppb indicates stratospheric air masses as mentioned
above; thus, the higher SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios above 11 km can be
attributed to the stratosphere and are hence associated with stratospheric
aerosol. The layer between 11 and 13.5 km can be influenced from the
stratosphere as well as the troposphere, as the data are averaged over a few
weeks and varying meteorological conditions, which lead to a broadening of
the 25th to 75th percentile range. In Fig. 4a, this layer
represents the mixed layer. The SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlates well with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
for all flights, similar to the flight on 2 June 2020, presented in Sect. 3.1 (Fig. 2).</p>
      <p id="d1e3566"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Previous studies investigated the sulfate aerosol in the UTLS region in
northern-hemispheric midlatitudes (Fig. 6b). The BLUESKY mixing ratios in
the UT agree well with the observations by Schneider et al. (2006) during May 2003, which were partly influenced by aircraft exhaust plumes. The BLUESKY mixing ratios are lower than the UT
background reported by Schmale et al. (2010). Martinsson et al. (2001,
2005) observed significantly lower SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the
European upper troposphere and tropopause region. The SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profile (Morgan et al., 2009) obtained from April 2005
to September 2006 over the UK shows higher SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
compared to the BLUESKY measurements. Morgan et al. (2009) suggest that the
elevated mixing ratios in the UT are the result of regional uplift of
polluted air masses during stagnant meteorological conditions over the UK.</p>
      <p id="d1e3615">Sulfate was measured in two previous <italic>HALO</italic> missions with the aerosol mass
spectrometer C-ToF-AMS in a similar altitude range and region. During
EMeRGe-EU, seven research flights were conducted in June/July 2017 above
Europe at altitudes up to 10 km
(Andrés
Hernández et al., 2022). The SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio was on average
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb and compares well to the BLUESKY SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mean in the same altitude range below 10 km. The second <italic>HALO</italic> mission was
CAFE-Africa in summer 2018, which reached altitudes up to 14 km. Here, only
data obtained over Europe (38–57<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) are used for the comparison, which include two test flights and the ferry flights (27 July, 1 August, 7 August, and 7 September 2018;
Voigt et al., 2022). For the CAFE-Africa subset the thermal tropopause was
slightly higher than during BLUESKY (Fig. 6b). For the altitude range
8–11 km, the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mean was (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb, similar to
the BLUESKY value. Above 11 km in the lower stratosphere, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
rises to (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb. Considering heights above the
tropopause, i.e., with enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios, the
stratospheric BLUESKY SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are a factor of 2 to 3
higher than the observations in summer 2018.</p>
      <p id="d1e3779">In the following, we investigate the origin of the elevated stratospheric
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios during BLUESKY. As mentioned above, we
calculated HYSPLIT back trajectories for cases of elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
In Fig. 5i–p, representative examples of trajectories are displayed. The
majority indicates long-range transport at high altitudes with potential
temperatures between 343 and 465 K. While the lower range of the potential
temperature is associated with midlatitude tropopause height, the upper
values are clearly associated with the stratosphere. As only few
trajectories indicate lower potential temperatures, we assume that the
majority of elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is already in the stratosphere 360 h
before sampling, and hence influence from the troposphere is negligible. One
major source of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the stratosphere is volcanic eruptions.
One year before BLUESKY, the volcano Raikoke on the Kuril Islands (Russia,
48.29<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 153.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in the western Pacific started to
erupt on 21 June 2019 and continued for some days; it was categorized as
volcanic explosivity index (VEI) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4. Several explosive eruptions emitted a
dense ash and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plume, which rose up to 19 and 20 km on
consecutive days (Hedelt et al., 2019), thus also injecting
into the stratosphere. Based on TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) analysis, de Leeuw et al. (2021) reported that the eruption released
1.4–1.6 Tg SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into the atmosphere and simulated also that
approximately 0.9–1.1 Tg SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> thereof was injected into the
stratosphere. Kloss et al. (2021) used satellite-based OMPS-LP
(Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite Limb Profiler) stratospheric aerosol optical depth (sAOD) to investigate the temporal evolution from before the Raikoke eruption until May 2020. Almost 1 year later, the sAOD was still higher
than prior to the eruption. This suggests that elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measured in the stratosphere during BLUESKY was partly caused by the Raikoke
eruption a year earlier. The eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980 was of
comparable size, midlatitude location, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Deshler et
al., 2006), and its impact was also visible for almost a
year. Still, other sources cannot be completely ruled out. For example,
severe wildfires in Alberta, Canada, developed pyrocumulus clouds in June
2019. The biomass burning emissions were uplifted into the lower
stratosphere (Osborne et al., 2022). In July
2019, also severe fires in Siberia, Russia, impacted the OMPS-LP sAOD (Kloss et
al., 2021). Ohneiser et al. (2021) discussed
self-lofting as a potential transport pathway in the UTLS for these Siberian
fires in the absence of strong vertical motion in July 2019. The smoke plume
could rise and reach the UT and further ascend into the LS. During the slow
ascent, the emissions are chemically altered; in the case of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, it is
transformed to SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Finally, the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could have
contributed to the enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the LS. Further, wildfires in
central Europe in May 2020 (European Commission et al., 2021) could also have
undergone this self-lofting process as the trajectories do not indicate
uplift over Europe and thus might additionally have contributed to elevated
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UTLS. In comparison to the Raikoke eruption, these
biomass burning contributions are of lower magnitude. Reifenberg et al. (2022) suggest that other small- and medium-sized volcanic eruptions from
tropical latitudes could have reached the stratosphere and thus impacted
the stratospheric aerosol over Europe. One example is the volcano Taal in
the Philippines (14.00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 120.99<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), which erupted on
12 January 2020, and its ash and gas plume rose up to around 10–15 km height
(Krippner and Venzke, 2020). The VEI was estimated to 3 and the
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions estimated to 0.019 Tg (Liu et al., 2020).
According to simulations of Reifenberg et al. (2022), the Taal eruption led
partly to an increase of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the LS during BLUESKY.</p>
      <p id="d1e4033">The measured SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the LS agree with other
volcano-related in situ studies. The highest mixing ratios are reported by
Schmale et al. (2010). They probed layers with enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
October/November 2008, roughly 3 months after the eruption of Mount Kasatochi
(erupted 8 August 2008; 52.18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 175.51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W; 1.5 Tg SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), with an injection height reaching into the stratosphere, and
additionally Mount Okmok (53.40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 168.17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) erupted
on 12 July 2008 (0.2 Tg SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Carn et al., 2008). Jurkat et al. (2010) also measured enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the stratosphere in the 3-month-old Kasatochi plume during the CONCERT campaign (Voigt et al.,
2010). Martinsson et al. (2009) reported that particulate
sulfur concentrations shortly after the Kasatochi eruption were 10 times
higher than before the eruption, and even 3–4 months after the eruption they
were enhanced by a factor of 3. In contrast, during volcanic quiescent
periods, like the period between 1997 and 2008 (Deshler, 2008), the
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduced mixing ratios in the stratosphere, and Martinsson
et al. (2005) reported SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios of
0.01 ppb for the lower stratosphere for the years 1999–2002.</p>
      <p id="d1e4160">The enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT as described in Sect. 4 and the longer
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime could possibly have a minor effect on the stratospheric
sulfate aerosol. In these conditions, the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> had more time to be
transported into the LS and finally be transformed to SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
adding to the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios. But it seems unlikely, as the
trajectories for elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5i–p) stay at high altitudes
(and high potential temperatures), and thus mixing from the troposphere into
the stratosphere is negligible. A few trajectories indicate a downward
transport from higher altitudes and thus an origin deeper in the stratosphere
(Fig. 5k/l), which could be a hint for OCS as an SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor. OCS
is transported within the Brewer–Dobson circulation from the upper
stratosphere to the lower stratosphere and is transformed via SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. According to Brühl et al. (2012), it is
the most important source for maintaining the stratospheric aerosol layer in
volcanic quiescent periods, and also for BLUESKY, OCS oxidation adds to the
stratospheric SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> background to some extent. Further, the Junge
layer might also influence the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the LS. Even
though the Junge layer is most pronounced at higher altitudes (Junge et al.,
1961), it could extend further down, or due to the downward transport
mentioned above (Fig. 5k/l) SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be transported downward
from the Junge layer into our measurement altitudes and thus contribute to
the elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusion and outlook</title>
      <p id="d1e4347">We find elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in stratospheric air masses
and enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in tropospheric air masses over central Europe and the North Atlantic in spring 2020. The elevated SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.06 ppb in the UT agrees with SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios performed in the background
of the North Atlantic flight corridor in 2008 (Jurkat et al., 2010) despite
lower air traffic due to COVID-19 restrictions in 2020. The 3.5 % increase
in air traffic since 2010 in part compensates for the air traffic reduction in
2020. In addition, exceptional dry weather conditions leading to a low cloud
fraction and low OH concentrations in the UTLS in May 2020 (Schumann et al.,
2021a, b; Van Heerwaarden et al., 2021) reduced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks and
increased SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime. Back trajectories provided indications of other
boundary layer SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources from convective or WCB transport and further
long-range transport in the UT, which could have contributed to a small
extent.</p>
      <p id="d1e4420">In the LS, enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were observed. In
comparison to previous studies, the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were
clearly above SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios reported during volcanic
quiescent periods (e.g., Martinsson et al., 2001, 2005) and agreed with
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in volcanically impacted air masses (e.g., Schmale
et al., 2010) measured at altitudes below 12 km. Compared to 2018,
stratospheric SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was significantly enhanced in 2020. The
eruption of the volcano Raikoke injected 0.9–1.1 Tg of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into the
stratosphere (de Leeuw et al., 2021) in June 2019. In May 2020, an enhanced
sAOD still was observed by Kloss et al. (2021) in the Northern Hemisphere
caused by the Raikoke eruption and to a smaller extent by severe biomass
burning events from June/July 2019 in Siberia and Canada. Further,
Reifenberg et al. (2022) found that the eruption of the tropical volcano
Taal in January 2020 contributed to the enhanced SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the LS.
We suggest these to be the primary sources of the enhanced stratospheric
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations measured during BLUESKY, because back
trajectories mainly showed long-range transport in the lower stratosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e4538">Overall, the unprecedented BLUESKY mission was conducted during exceptional
meteorological conditions and also reduced air traffic; both impacted the
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the UT due to changes in the emissions and also
sinks. The enhanced stratospheric sulfate aerosol, which was observed, was
likely impacted by the volcano Raikoke and smaller sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e4550">Together with the observations of other sulfur compounds such as gaseous
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on <italic>HALO</italic>, which are still under evaluation, the unique and
comprehensive data set of sulfur compounds allows us to test our understanding
of the sulfur chemistry in global models (Reifenberg et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e4575"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>In a broader context, the present results give new insights in the sulfur
chemistry in the UTLS region with respect to limited sources and sinks. They
help to better understand (a) the sensitivity of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to missing sinks
and (b) the stratospheric aerosol and its dependence on perturbations and
their lasting impacts. Both aspects are important to improve models,
especially with respect to simulations of the Earth's radiation budget,
because changes in the radiation balance in the UTLS impact feedback
processes in the global climate.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4592">Data are available on request at the <italic>HALO</italic> database at
<uri>https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/mission/119</uri> (HALO, 2022).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4604">CV, TJW, HS, and JL planned the flight experiment. AM, JL, KK, JS, MS, and LR
performed the in-flight measurements. KK and JS provided evaluated
particulate data and previous campaign data and supported the analysis. AM
provided supporting evaluation and assisted the analysis. FO, AZ, HF, LR, and MZ
provided supporting evaluation. SK supported the analysis. LT evaluated and
analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript with contributions from CV,
AM, TJW, JS, KK, HF, and SK. All co-authors commented on the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4610">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4616">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4622">This article is part of the special issue “BLUESKY atmospheric composition measurements by aircraft during the COVID-19 lockdown in spring 2020”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4628">The <italic>HALO</italic> flights
during the BLUESKY mission were funded by the Max Planck Society. The
authors gratefully acknowledge the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) for
the provision of the HYSPLIT transport and dispersion model and/or READY
website (<uri>https://www.ready.noaa.gov</uri>, last access: 22 November 2022) used in this publication. The authors
thank Andreas Giez, Christian Mallaun, and Vladyslav Nenakhov for providing
the water vapor measurement on board <italic>HALO</italic> and <italic>Falcon</italic>, as well as Benedikt
Steil for providing the ECMWF/ERA5 reanalysis data.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4645">Laura Tomsche is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German
Research Foundation), grant no. TRR 301 and project ID 428312742. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \notforhtml{\newline}?>publication were covered by the German Aerospace Center (DLR).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4657">This paper was edited by Joshua Fu and reviewed by Daniele Visioni, Cheng-En Yang, and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Aas, W., Mortier, A., Bowersox, V., Cherian, R., Faluvegi, G., Fagerli, H.,
Hand, J., Klimont, Z., Galy-Lacaux, C., Lehmann, C. M. B., Myhre, C. L.,
Myhre, G., Olivié, D., Sato, K., Quaas, J., Rao, P. S. P., Schulz, M.,
Shindell, D., Skeie, R. B., Stein, A., Takemura, T., Tsyro, S., Vet, R., and Xu,
X.: Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9,
953, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kürten, A., Ortega, I. K.,
Kupiainen-Määttä, O., Praplan, A. P., Adamov, A., Amorim, A.,
Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M.,
Downard, A., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin,
A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Henschel, H., Jokinen,
T., Junninen, H., Kajos, M., Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A.,
Kurtén, T., Kvashin, A. N., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M.,
Leppä, J., Loukonen, V., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., McGrath, M. J.,
Nieminen, T., Olenius, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T., Riccobono, F.,
Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M., Rondo, L., Ruuskanen, T., Santos, F. D.,
Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Simon, M.,
Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J.,
Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y., Virtanen, A., Vrtala, A.,
Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Williamson, C., Wimmer, D., Ye, P.,
Yli-Juuti, T., Carslaw, K. S., Kulmala, M., Curtius, J., Baltensperger, U.,
Worsnop, D. R., Vehkamäki, H., and Kirkby, J.: Molecular understanding of
sulphuric acid–amine particle nucleation in the atmosphere, Nature, 502,
359–363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12663" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12663</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andrés Hernández, M. D., Hilboll, A., Ziereis, H., Förster, E., Krüger, O. O., Kaiser, K., Schneider, J., Barnaba, F., Vrekoussis, M., Schmidt, J., Huntrieser, H., Blechschmidt, A.-M., George, M., Nenakhov, V., Harlass, T., Holanda, B. A., Wolf, J., Eirenschmalz, L., Krebsbach, M., Pöhlker, M. L., Kalisz Hedegaard, A. B., Mei, L., Pfeilsticker, K., Liu, Y., Koppmann, R., Schlager, H., Bohn, B., Schumann, U., Richter, A., Schreiner, B., Sauer, D., Baumann, R., Mertens, M., Jöckel, P., Kilian, M., Stratmann, G., Pöhlker, C., Campanelli, M., Pandolfi, M., Sicard, M., Gómez-Amo, J. L., Pujadas, M., Bigge, K., Kluge, F., Schwarz, A., Daskalakis, N., Walter, D., Zahn, A., Pöschl, U., Bönisch, H., Borrmann, S., Platt, U., and Burrows, J. P.: Overview: On the transport and transformation of pollutants in the outflow of major population centres – observational data from the EMeRGe European intensive operational period in summer 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5877–5924, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5877-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-5877-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arnold, F., Schneider, J., Gollinger, K., Schlager, H., Schulte, P., Hagen,
D. E., Whitefield, P. D., and van Velthoven, P.: Observation of upper
tropospheric sulfur dioxide- and acetone-pollution: Potential implications
for hydroxyl radicaland aerosol formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24,
57–60, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96gl03693" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96gl03693</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Brock, C., Hamill, P., Wilson, J., Jonsson, H., and Chan, K.: Particle
formation in the upper tropical troposphere: A source of nuclei for the
stratospheric aerosol, Science, 270, 1650–1653, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brühl, C., Lelieveld, J., Crutzen, P. J., and Tost, H.: The role of carbonyl sulphide as a source of stratospheric sulphate aerosol and its impact on climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1239–1253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1239-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1239-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Carn, S., Krotkov, N., Fioletov, V., Yang, K., Krueger, A., and Tarasick, D.: Emission, transport and validation of sulfur dioxide in the 2008 Okmok and Kasatochi eruption clouds, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, San Francisco, December 2008, A51J-07,  2008AGUFM.A51J..07C, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Clarisse, L., Fromm, M., Ngadi, Y., Emmons, L., Clerbaux, C., Hurtmans, D.,
and Coheur, P.-F.: Intercontinental transport of anthropogenic sulfur
dioxide and other pollutants: An infrared remote sensing case study,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048976" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL048976</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crutzen, P. J.: Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma?, Climatic Change, 77, 211–219, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., Thomson, D. S., and Murphy, D. M.: Ablation, Flux, and
Atmospheric Implications of Meteors Inferred from Stratospheric Aerosol,
Science, 291, 1772–1775, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1057737</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>de Leeuw, J., Schmidt, A., Witham, C. S., Theys, N., Taylor, I. A., Grainger, R. G., Pope, R. J., Haywood, J., Osborne, M., and Kristiansen, N. I.: The 2019 Raikoke volcanic eruption – Part 1: Dispersion model simulations and satellite retrievals of volcanic sulfur dioxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10851–10879, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10851-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-10851-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Deshler, T.: A review of global stratospheric aerosol: Measurements,
importance, life cycle, and local stratospheric aerosol, Atmos.
Res., 90, 223–232, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Deshler, T., Anderson-Sprecher, R., Jäger, H., Barnes, J., Hofmann, D.
J., Clemesha, B., Simonich, D., Osborn, M., Grainger, R. G., and Godin-Beekmann,
S.: Trends in the nonvolcanic component of stratospheric aerosol over the
period 1971–2004, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D01201,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006089</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drewnick, F., Hings, S. S., DeCarlo, P., Jayne, J. T., Gonin, M., Fuhrer,
K., Weimer, S., Jimenez, J. L., Demerjian, K. L., Borrmann, S., and Worsnop, D.
R.: A New Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (TOF-AMS) – Instrument
Description and First Field Deployment, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39,
637–658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500182040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500182040</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>English, J. M., Toon, O. B., Mills, M. J., and Yu, F.: Microphysical simulations of new particle formation in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9303–9322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9303-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9303-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>European Commission, Joint Research Centre, San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Durrant, T., Boca, R.,
Maianti, P., Libertà, G., Artés Vivancos, T., Oom, D., Branco, A.,
Tomàs. Rigo, D., Ferrari, D., Pfeiffer, H., Grecchi, R., Nuijten, D.,
Onida, M., and Löffler, P.: Forest Fires in Europe, Middle East and North
Africa 2020, Publications Office of the European Union, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2760/216446" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2760/216446</ext-link>,
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fiedler, V., Nau, R., Ludmann, S., Arnold, F., Schlager, H., and Stohl, A.: East Asian SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution plume over Europe – Part 1: Airborne trace gas measurements and source identification by particle dispersion model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4717–4728, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4717-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-4717-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fischer, H., Wienhold, F. G., Hoor, P., Bujok, O., Schiller, C., Siegmund,
P., Ambaum, M., Scheeren, H. A., and Lelieveld, J.: Tracer correlations in the
northern high latitude lowermost stratosphere: Influence of cross-tropopause
mass exchange, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 97–100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010879" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL010879</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fromm, M., Bevilacqua, R., Servranckx, R., Rosen, J., Thayer, J. P., Herman,
J., and Larko, D.: Pyro-cumulonimbus injection of smoke to the stratosphere:
Observations and impact of a super blowup in northwestern Canada on 3–4
August 1998, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D08205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005350" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005350</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fueglistaler, S., Dessler, A. E., Dunkerton, T. J., Folkins, I., Fu, Q., and Mote, P. W.: Tropical tropopause layer, Rev. Geophys., 47, RG1004, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008RG000267</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gottschaldt, K.-D., Schlager, H., Baumann, R., Bozem, H., Eyring, V., Hoor, P., Jöckel, P., Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.: Trace gas composition in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone: a case study based on aircraft observations and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6091–6111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6091-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-6091-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gottschaldt, K.-D., Schlager, H., Baumann, R., Cai, D. S., Eyring, V., Graf, P., Grewe, V., Jöckel, P., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Voigt, C., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.: Dynamics and composition of the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5655–5675, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5655-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-5655-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>HALO:
Mission: BLUESKY, HALO [data set], available upon request, <uri>https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/mission/119</uri>, last access: 22 November 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hamryszczak, Z. T., Pozzer, A., Obersteiner, F., Bohn, B., Steil, B., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Distribution of hydrogen peroxide over Europe during the BLUESKY aircraft campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9483–9497, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9483-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-9483-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hedelt, P., Efremenko, D. S., Loyola, D. G., Spurr, R., and Clarisse, L.: Sulfur dioxide layer height retrieval from Sentinel-5 Precursor/TROPOMI using FP_ILM, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5503–5517, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5503-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-5503-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hegglin, M. I., Boone, C. D., Manney, G. L., and Walker, K. A.: A global
view of the extratropical tropopause transition layer from Atmospheric
Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer O3, H2O, and CO, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00B11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009984" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009984</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoor, P., Fischer, H., Lange, L., Lelieveld, J., and Brunner, D.: Seasonal
variations of a mixing layer in the lowermost stratosphere as identified by
the CO-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> correlation from in situ measurements, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 107, ACL 1-1–ACL 1-11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000289" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000289</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Junge, C. E., Chagnon, C. W., and Manson, J. E.: Stratospheric aerosols,
J. Atmos. Sci., 18, 81–108, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Arnold, F., Schlager, H., Aufmhoff, H., Schmale, J.,
Schneider, J., Lichtenstern, M., and Dörnbrack, A.: Airborne stratospheric
ITCIMS measurements of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl, and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the aged plume of volcano
Kasatochi, J. Geophys. Res., 115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd013890" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd013890</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Arnold, F., Schlager, H., Kleffmann, J., Aufmhoff,
H., Schäuble, D., Schaefer, M., and Schumann, U.: Measurements of HONO, NO,
NOy and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in aircraft exhaust plumes at cruise, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 38, L10807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl046884" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011gl046884</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Kaufmann, S., Zahn, A., Sprenger, M., Hoor, P.,
Bozem, H., Müller, S., Dörnbrack, A., Schlager, H., Bönisch, H., and
Engel, A.: A quantitative analysis of stratospheric HCl, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
tropopause region near the subtropical jet, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
41, 3315–3321, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl059159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013gl059159</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, S., Voigt, C., Schäuble, D., Jeßberger, P., and Ziereis, H.: The airborne mass spectrometer AIMS – Part 2: Measurements of trace gases with stratospheric or tropospheric origin in the UTLS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1907–1923, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1907-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-1907-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kanamitsu, M.: Description of the NMC Global Data Assimilation and Forecast
System, Weather Forecast., 4, 335–342,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:Dotngd&gt;2.0.Co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:Dotngd&gt;2.0.Co;2</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaufmann, S., Voigt, C., Heller, R., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Zöger, M., Giez, A., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Thornberry, T., and Schumann, U.: Intercomparison of midlatitude tropospheric and lower-stratospheric water vapor measurements and comparison to ECMWF humidity data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16729–16745, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16729-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-16729-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirkby, J., Curtius, J., Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kürten, A.,
Ortega, I. K., Kupiainen-Määttä, O., Praplan, A. P., Adamov, A.,
Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Donahue,
N. M., Downard, A., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R and
Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Franchin, A., Gagné, S., Ickes,
L., Kürten, A., Kupc, A., Metzger, A., Riccobono, F., Rondo, L.,
Schobesberger, S., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Wimmer, D., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F.,
Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Downard, A., Ehn, M., Flagan, R.
C., Haider, S., Hansel, A., Hauser, D., Jud, W., Junninen, H., Kreissl, F.,
Kvashin, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Lima, J., Lovejoy, E. R.,
Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Mikkilä, J., Minginette, P., Mogo, S.,
Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Pereira, P., Petäjä, T., Schnitzhofer, R.,
Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A.,
Vanhanen, J., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Walther, H.,
Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Winkler, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Worsnop, D. R.,
Baltensperger, U., and Kulmala, M.: Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia and galactic
cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Nature, 476, 429–433,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature10343</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Klausner, T., Mertens, M., Huntrieser, H., Galkowski, M., Kuhlmann, G.,
Baumann, R., Fiehn, A., Jöckel, P., Pühl, M., and Roiger, A.: Urban
greenhouse gas emissions from the Berlin area: A case study using airborne
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in situ observations in summer 2018, Elementa, 8, 15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.411" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.411</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kloss, C., Berthet, G., Sellitto, P., Ploeger, F., Taha, G., Tidiga, M., Eremenko, M., Bossolasco, A., Jégou, F., Renard, J.-B., and Legras, B.: Stratospheric aerosol layer perturbation caused by the 2019 Raikoke and Ulawun eruptions and their radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 535–560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-535-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-535-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T.,
Anderson-Sprecher, R., Jäger, H., Barnes, J., Hofmann, D. J., Clemesha,
B., Simonich, D., Osborn, M., Grainger, R. G., Godin-Beekmann, S., Timmreck,
C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A., Schwarz, J. P., and Weigel, R.: Stratospheric
aerosol – Observations, processes, and impact on climate, J. Rev.
Geophys., 54, 278–335, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Krippner, J. B. and Venzke, E. (Eds.): Global Volcanism Program,
Report on Taal (Philippines) Bulletin of the Global Volcanism Network, 45-6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5479/si.GVP.BGVN202006-273070" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5479/si.GVP.BGVN202006-273070</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Krüger, O. O., Holanda, B. A., Chowdhury, S., Pozzer, A., Walter, D., Pöhlker, C., Andrés Hernández, M. D., Burrows, J. P., Voigt, C., Lelieveld, J., Quaas, J., Pöschl, U., and Pöhlker, M. L.: Black carbon aerosol reductions during COVID-19 confinement quantified by aircraft measurements over Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8683–8699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8683-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-8683-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, C., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Lee, H., Dickerson, R. R., Hains,
J. C., Krotkov, N., Richter, A., Vinnikov, K., and Schwab, J. J.: SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
and lifetimes: Estimates from inverse modeling using in situ and global,
space-based (SCIAMACHY and OMI) observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 116, D06304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014758" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014758</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Skowron, A., Allen, M. R., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q.,
Doherty, S. J., Freeman, S., Forster, P. M., and Fuglestvedt, J.: The contribution
of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018, J
Atmos. Environ., 244, 117834, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lee, D. S., Pitari, G., Grewe, V., Gierens, K., Penner, J. E., Petzold, A.,
Prather, M. J., Schumann, U., Bais, A., and Berntsen, T.: Transport impacts on
atmosphere and climate: Aviation, J. Atmos. Environ., 44, 4678–4734,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J.: Multi-phase processes in the atmospheric sulfur cycle, in:
Interactions of C, N, P and S biogeochemical cycles and global change, edited by: Wollast, R., Mackenzie, F. T., and Chou, L.,
Springer, 305–331, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76064-8_13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-76064-8_13</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, F., Xing, C., Li, J., Wang, B., Chai, J., Gao, C., Huang, G., Liu, J., and
Chen, D.: Could the Recent Taal Volcano Eruption Trigger an El Niño and
Lead to Eurasian Warming?, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 37, 663–670,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-2041-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-020-2041-z</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marsing, A.: Chlorine Partitioning in the Lowermost Arctic Stratosphere During Winter-an Aircraft in Situ Measurement Perspective, Dissertation, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, 104 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-6263" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25358/openscience-6263</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marsing, A., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Grooß, J.-U., Kaufmann, S., Heller, R., Engel, A., Hoor, P., Krause, J., and Voigt, C.: Chlorine partitioning in the lowermost Arctic vortex during the cold winter 2015/2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10757–10772, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10757-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-10757-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Martinsson, B. G., Papaspiropoulos, G., Heintzenberg, J., and Hermann, M. J.
G. R. L.: Fine mode participate sulphur in the tropopause region measured
from intercontinental flights (CARIBIC), Geophys. Res. Lett., 28,
1175–1178, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martinsson, B. G., Nguyen, H. N., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Zahn, A.,
Heintzenberg, J., Hermann, M., and van Velthoven, P. F. J.: Characteristics
and origin of lowermost stratospheric aerosol at northern midlatitudes under
volcanically quiescent conditions based on CARIBIC observations, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D12201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005644" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005644</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martinsson, B. G., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Carn, S. A., Hermann, M., Heue,
K.-P., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.: Influence of the 2008
Kasatochi volcanic eruption on sulfurous and carbonaceous aerosol
constituents in the lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L12813,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL038735</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
McCormick, M. P., Thomason, L. W., and Trepte, C. R.: Atmospheric effects of
the Mt Pinatubo eruption, Nature, 373, 399–404, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miller, M., Brook, P., and Eyers, C.: Reduction of Sulphur Limits in Aviation Fuel Standards (SULPHUR), European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/2009-SULPHUR-Reduction of sulphur limits in aviation fuel standards-Final Report.pdf">https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/2009-SULPHUR-Reduction of sulphur limits in aviation fuel standards-Final Report.pdf</ext-link> (last access: 11 February 2022), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Molleker, S., Helleis, F., Klimach, T., Appel, O., Clemen, H.-C., Dragoneas, A., Gurk, C., Hünig, A., Köllner, F., Rubach, F., Schulz, C., Schneider, J., and Borrmann, S.: Application of an O-ring pinch device as a constant-pressure inlet (CPI) for airborne sampling, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3651–3660, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3651-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-3651-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Morgan, W. T., Allan, J. D., Bower, K. N., Capes, G., Crosier, J., Williams, P. I., and Coe, H.: Vertical distribution of sub-micron aerosol chemical composition from North-Western Europe and the North-East Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5389–5401, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5389-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5389-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D., Froyd, K., Schwarz, J., and Wilson, J.: Observations of the
chemical composition of stratospheric aerosol particles, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 1269–1278, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nussbaumer, C. M., Pozzer, A., Tadic, I., Röder, L., Obersteiner, F., Harder, H., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Tropospheric ozone production and chemical regime analysis during the COVID-19 lockdown over Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6151–6165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6151-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-6151-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ohneiser, K., Ansmann, A., Chudnovsky, A., Engelmann, R., Ritter, C., Veselovskii, I., Baars, H., Gebauer, H., Griesche, H., Radenz, M., Hofer, J., Althausen, D., Dahlke, S., and Maturilli, M.: The unexpected smoke layer in the High Arctic winter stratosphere during MOSAiC 2019–2020 , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15783–15808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15783-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-15783-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Osborne, M. J., de Leeuw, J., Witham, C., Schmidt, A., Beckett, F., Kristiansen, N., Buxmann, J., Saint, C., Welton, E. J., Fochesatto, J., Gomes, A. R., Bundke, U., Petzold, A., Marenco, F., and Haywood, J.: The 2019 Raikoke volcanic eruption – Part 2: Particle-phase dispersion and concurrent wildfire smoke emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2975–2997, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2975-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-2975-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pan, L. L., Randel, W. J., Gary, B. L., Mahoney, M. J., and Hintsa, E. J.:
Definitions and sharpness of the extratropical tropopause: A trace gas
perspective, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004982" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004982</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peterson, D. A., Campbell, J. R., Hyer, E. J., Fromm, M. D., Kablick, G. P.,
Cossuth, J. H., and DeLand, M. T.: Wildfire-driven thunderstorms cause a
volcano-like stratospheric injection of smoke, npj Climate and Atmospheric
Science, 1, 30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Walker, K., and Riese, M.: Quantifying pollution
transport from the Asian monsoon anticyclone into the lower stratosphere,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7055-7066, 10.5194/acp-17-7055-2017, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reifenberg, S. F., Martin, A., Kohl, M., Bacer, S., Hamryszczak, Z., Tadic, I., Röder, L., Crowley, D. J., Fischer, H., Kaiser, K., Schneider, J., Dörich, R., Crowley, J. N., Tomsche, L., Marsing, A., Voigt, C., Zahn, A., Pöhlker, C., Holanda, B. A., Krüger, O., Pöschl, U., Pöhlker, M., Jöckel, P., Dorf, M., Schumann, U., Williams, J., Bohn, B., Curtius, J., Harder, H., Schlager, H., Lelieveld, J., and Pozzer, A.: Numerical simulation of the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on tropospheric composition and aerosol radiative forcing in Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10901–10917, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10901-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-10901-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rolph, G., Stein, A., and Stunder, B.: Real-time Environmental Applications
and Display sYstem: READY, Environ. Modell. Softw., 95,
210–228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schäfer, S., Lawrence, M., Stelzer, H., Born, W., Low, S., Aaheim, A., Adriázola, P., Betz, G., Boucher, O., Carius, A., Devine-Right, P., Gullberg, A. T., Haszeldine, S., Haywood, J., Houghton, K., Ibarrola, R., Irvine, P., Kristjansson, J.-E., Lenton, T., Link, J. S. A., Maas, A., Meyer, L., Muri, H., Oschlies, A., Proelß, A., Rayner, T., Rickels, W., Ruthner, L., Scheffran, J., Schmidt, H., Schulz, M., Scott, V., Shackley, S., Tänzler, D., Watson, M., and Vaughan, N.: The European transdisciplinary assessment of climate engineering (EuTRACE): Removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight away from Earth, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam (IASS) e.V, <uri>https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002D-E568-C</uri> (last access: 23 November 2022), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schiller, C. L., Bozem, H., Gurk, C., Parchatka, U., Königstedt, R.,
Harris, G. W., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Applications of quantum cascade
lasers for sensitive trace gas measurements of CO, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and HCHO,
Appl. Phys. B, 92, 419–430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3125-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00340-008-3125-0</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmale, J., Schneider, J., Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Kalesse, H., Rautenhaus,
M., Lichtenstern, M., Schlager, H., Ancellet, G., Arnold, F., Gerding, M.,
Mattis, I., Wendisch, M., and Borrmann, S.: Aerosol layers from the 2008
eruptions of Mount Okmok and Mount Kasatochi: In situ upper troposphere and
lower stratosphere measurements of sulfate and organics over Europe, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00L07, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013628" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd013628</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schneider, J., Hings, S. S., Hock, N. B., Weimer, S., Borrmann, S., Fiebig,
M., Petzold, A., Busen, R., and Kärcher, B.: Aircraft-based operation of an
aerosol mass spectrometer: Measurements of tropospheric aerosol composition,
J. Aerosol Sci., 37, 839–857, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.07.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.07.002</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schneider, J., Weigel, R., Klimach, T., Dragoneas, A., Appel, O., Hünig, A., Molleker, S., Köllner, F., Clemen, H.-C., Eppers, O., Hoppe, P., Hoor, P., Mahnke, C., Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Grooß, J.-U., Zahn, A., Obersteiner, F., Ravegnani, F., Ulanovsky, A., Schlager, H., Scheibe, M., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., Nowak, J. B., Zöger, M., and Borrmann, S.: Aircraft-based observation of meteoric material in lower-stratospheric aerosol particles between 15 and 68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 989–1013, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-989-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-989-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schulte, P. and Schlager, H.: In-flight measurements of cruise altitude
nitric oxide emission indices of commercial jet aircraft, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 23, 165–168, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL03691" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95GL03691</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schulz, C., Schneider, J., Amorim Holanda, B., Appel, O., Costa, A., de Sá, S. S., Dreiling, V., Fütterer, D., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Klimach, T., Knote, C., Krämer, M., Martin, S. T., Mertes, S., Pöhlker, M. L., Sauer, D., Voigt, C., Walser, A., Weinzierl, B., Ziereis, H., Zöger, M., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Machado, L. A. T., Pöschl, U., Wendisch, M., and Borrmann, S.: Aircraft-based observations of isoprene-epoxydiol-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA) in the tropical upper troposphere over the Amazon region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14979–15001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14979-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14979-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schumann, U., Bugliaro, L., Dörnbrack, A., Baumann, R., and Voigt, C.:
Aviation Contrail Cirrus and Radiative Forcing Over Europe During 6 Months
of COVID-19, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL092771, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092771" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL092771</ext-link>, 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schumann, U., Poll, I., Teoh, R., Koelle, R., Spinielli, E., Molloy, J., Koudis, G. S., Baumann, R., Bugliaro, L., Stettler, M., and Voigt, C.: Air traffic and contrail changes over Europe during COVID-19: a model study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7429–7450, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7429-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-7429-2021</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, 2nd Edn., John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sheng, J.-X., Weisenstein, D. K., Luo, B.-P., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Anet,
J., Bingemer, H., and Peter, T.: Global atmospheric sulfur budget under
volcanically quiescent conditions: Aerosol-chemistry-climate model
predictions and validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
120, 256–276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021985" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021985</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Solomon, S., Daniel, J. S., Neely III, R. R., Vernier, J. P., Dutton, E. G., and Thomason, L. W.: The persistently variable “background” stratospheric aerosol layer and global climate change, Science, 333, 866–870, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1206027</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Speidel, M., Nau, R., Arnold, F., Schlager, H., and Stohl, A.: Sulfur
dioxide measurements in the lower, middle and upper troposphere: Deployment
of an aircraft-based chemical ionization mass spectrometer with permanent
in-flight calibration, Atmos. Environ., 41, 2427–2437,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.047</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J., Cohen, M. D., and
Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling
system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stockwell, W. R. and Calvert, J. G.: The mechanism of the HO-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction,
Atmos. Environ., 17, 2231–2235, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(83)90220-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(83)90220-2</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thouret, V., Cammas, J.-P., Sauvage, B., Athier, G., Zbinden, R., Nédélec, P., Simon, P., and Karcher, F.: Tropopause referenced ozone climatology and inter-annual variability (1994–2003) from the MOZAIC programme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1033–1051, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1033-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-1033-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tomsche, L., Pozzer, A., Ojha, N., Parchatka, U., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Upper tropospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO affected by the South Asian summer monsoon during the Oxidation Mechanism Observations mission, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1915–1939, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1915-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-1915-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van Heerwaarden, C. C., Mol, W. B., Veerman, M. A., Benedict, I.,
Heusinkveld, B. G., Knap, W. H., Kazadzis, S., Kouremeti, N., and Fiedler, S.:
Record high solar irradiance in Western Europe during first COVID-19
lockdown largely due to unusual weather, Commun. Earth
Environ., 2, 37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00110-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-021-00110-0</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vogel, B., Günther, G., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Hoor, P., Krämer, M., Müller, S., Zahn, A., and Riese, M.: Fast transport from Southeast Asia boundary layer sources to northern Europe: rapid uplift in typhoons and eastward eddy shedding of the Asian monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12745–12762, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12745-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12745-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vogel, B., Günther, G., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Afchine, A., Bozem, H., Hoor, P., Krämer, M., Müller, S., Riese, M., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Stiller, G. P., Ungermann, J., and Zahn, A.: Long-range transport pathways of tropospheric source gases originating in Asia into the northern lower stratosphere during the Asian monsoon season 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15301–15325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15301-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-15301-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vogel, B., Müller, R., Günther, G., Spang, R., Hanumanthu, S., Li, D., Riese, M., and Stiller, G. P.: Lagrangian simulations of the transport of young air masses to the top of the Asian monsoon anticyclone and into the tropical pipe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6007–6034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6007-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6007-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Schumann, U., Jurkat, T., Schäuble, D., Schlager, H., Petzold, A., Gayet, J.-F., Krämer, M., Schneider, J., Borrmann, S., Schmale, J., Jessberger, P., Hamburger, T., Lichtenstern, M., Scheibe, M., Gourbeyre, C., Meyer, J., Kübbeler, M., Frey, W., Kalesse, H., Butler, T., Lawrence, M. G., Holzäpfel, F., Arnold, F., Wendisch, M., Döpelheuer, A., Gottschaldt, K., Baumann, R., Zöger, M., Sölch, I., Rautenhaus, M., and Dörnbrack, A.: In-situ observations of young contrails – overview and selected results from the CONCERT campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9039–9056, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9039-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9039-2010</ext-link>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Jessberger, P., Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, S., Baumann, R., Schlager,
H., Bobrowski, N., Giuffrida, G., and Salerno, G.: Evolution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl,
and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the volcanic plumes from Etna, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,
2196–2203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl058974" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013gl058974</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Lelieveld, J., Schlager, H., Schneider, J., Curtius, J.,
Meerkötter, R., Sauer, D., Bugliaro, L., Bohn, B., Crowley, J. N.,
Erbertseder, T., Groß, S., Hahn, V., Li, Q., Mertens, M.,
Pöhlker, M. L., Pozzer, A., Schumann, U., Tomsche, L., Williams, J.,
Zahn, A., Andreae, M., Borrmann, S., Bräuer, T., Dörich, R.,
Dörnbrack, A., Edtbauer, A., Ernle, L., Fischer, H., Giez, A., Granzin,
M., Grewe, V., Harder, H., Heinritzi, M., Holanda, B. A., Jöckel, P.,
Kaiser, K., Krüger, O. O., Lucke, J., Marsing, A., Martin, A., Matthes,
S., Pöhlker, C., Pöschl, U., Reifenberg, S., Ringsdorf, A., Scheibe,
M., Tadic, I., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Henke, R., and Rapp, M.: Cleaner skies
during the COVID-19 lockdown, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 103, E1796–E1827, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-21-0012.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/bams-d-21-0012.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>von Hobe, M., Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Kloss, C., Ulanowski, A., Yushkov, V., Ravegnani, F., Volk, C. M., Pan, L. L., Honomichl, S. B., Tilmes, S., Kinnison, D. E., Garcia, R. R., and Wright, J. S.: Upward transport into and within the Asian monsoon anticyclone as inferred from StratoClim trace gas observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1267–1285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Williamson, C. J., Kupc, A., Rollins, A., Kazil, J., Froyd, K. D., Ray, E. A., Murphy, D. M., Schill, G. P., Peischl, J., Thompson, C., Bourgeois, I., Ryerson, T. B., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., Blake, D. R., Bui, T. P. V., Dollner, M., Weinzierl, B., and Brock, C. A.: Large hemispheric difference in nucleation mode aerosol concentrations in the lowermost stratosphere at mid- and high latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9065–9088, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9065-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-9065-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zahn, A., Weppner, J., Widmann, H., Schlote-Holubek, K., Burger, B., Kühner, T., and Franke, H.: A fast and precise chemiluminescence ozone detector for eddy flux and airborne application, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 363–375, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-363-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-363-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ziereis, H., Schlager, H., Schulte, P., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Slemr,
F.: Distributions of NO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere and lower
stratosphere between 28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 61<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N during POLINAT 2,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 3653–3664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900870" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900870</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Enhanced sulfur in the upper troposphere and  lower stratosphere in spring 2020</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aas, W., Mortier, A., Bowersox, V., Cherian, R., Faluvegi, G., Fagerli, H.,
Hand, J., Klimont, Z., Galy-Lacaux, C., Lehmann, C. M. B., Myhre, C. L.,
Myhre, G., Olivié, D., Sato, K., Quaas, J., Rao, P. S. P., Schulz, M.,
Shindell, D., Skeie, R. B., Stein, A., Takemura, T., Tsyro, S., Vet, R., and Xu,
X.: Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9,
953, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kürten, A., Ortega, I. K.,
Kupiainen-Määttä, O., Praplan, A. P., Adamov, A., Amorim, A.,
Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M.,
Downard, A., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin,
A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Henschel, H., Jokinen,
T., Junninen, H., Kajos, M., Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A.,
Kurtén, T., Kvashin, A. N., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M.,
Leppä, J., Loukonen, V., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., McGrath, M. J.,
Nieminen, T., Olenius, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T., Riccobono, F.,
Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M., Rondo, L., Ruuskanen, T., Santos, F. D.,
Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Simon, M.,
Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J.,
Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y., Virtanen, A., Vrtala, A.,
Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Williamson, C., Wimmer, D., Ye, P.,
Yli-Juuti, T., Carslaw, K. S., Kulmala, M., Curtius, J., Baltensperger, U.,
Worsnop, D. R., Vehkamäki, H., and Kirkby, J.: Molecular understanding of
sulphuric acid–amine particle nucleation in the atmosphere, Nature, 502,
359–363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12663" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12663</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Andrés Hernández, M. D., Hilboll, A., Ziereis, H., Förster, E., Krüger, O. O., Kaiser, K., Schneider, J., Barnaba, F., Vrekoussis, M., Schmidt, J., Huntrieser, H., Blechschmidt, A.-M., George, M., Nenakhov, V., Harlass, T., Holanda, B. A., Wolf, J., Eirenschmalz, L., Krebsbach, M., Pöhlker, M. L., Kalisz Hedegaard, A. B., Mei, L., Pfeilsticker, K., Liu, Y., Koppmann, R., Schlager, H., Bohn, B., Schumann, U., Richter, A., Schreiner, B., Sauer, D., Baumann, R., Mertens, M., Jöckel, P., Kilian, M., Stratmann, G., Pöhlker, C., Campanelli, M., Pandolfi, M., Sicard, M., Gómez-Amo, J. L., Pujadas, M., Bigge, K., Kluge, F., Schwarz, A., Daskalakis, N., Walter, D., Zahn, A., Pöschl, U., Bönisch, H., Borrmann, S., Platt, U., and Burrows, J. P.: Overview: On the transport and transformation of pollutants in the outflow of major population centres – observational data from the EMeRGe European intensive operational period in summer 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5877–5924, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5877-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5877-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Arnold, F., Schneider, J., Gollinger, K., Schlager, H., Schulte, P., Hagen,
D. E., Whitefield, P. D., and van Velthoven, P.: Observation of upper
tropospheric sulfur dioxide- and acetone-pollution: Potential implications
for hydroxyl radicaland aerosol formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24,
57–60, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96gl03693" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96gl03693</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Brock, C., Hamill, P., Wilson, J., Jonsson, H., and Chan, K.: Particle
formation in the upper tropical troposphere: A source of nuclei for the
stratospheric aerosol, Science, 270, 1650–1653, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brühl, C., Lelieveld, J., Crutzen, P. J., and Tost, H.: The role of carbonyl sulphide as a source of stratospheric sulphate aerosol and its impact on climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1239–1253, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1239-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1239-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Carn, S., Krotkov, N., Fioletov, V., Yang, K., Krueger, A., and Tarasick, D.: Emission, transport and validation of sulfur dioxide in the 2008 Okmok and Kasatochi eruption clouds, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, San Francisco, December 2008, A51J-07,  2008AGUFM.A51J..07C, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Clarisse, L., Fromm, M., Ngadi, Y., Emmons, L., Clerbaux, C., Hurtmans, D.,
and Coheur, P.-F.: Intercontinental transport of anthropogenic sulfur
dioxide and other pollutants: An infrared remote sensing case study,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048976" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048976</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Crutzen, P. J.: Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma?, Climatic Change, 77, 211–219, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Thomson, D. S., and Murphy, D. M.: Ablation, Flux, and
Atmospheric Implications of Meteors Inferred from Stratospheric Aerosol,
Science, 291, 1772–1775, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057737</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
de Leeuw, J., Schmidt, A., Witham, C. S., Theys, N., Taylor, I. A., Grainger, R. G., Pope, R. J., Haywood, J., Osborne, M., and Kristiansen, N. I.: The 2019 Raikoke volcanic eruption – Part 1: Dispersion model simulations and satellite retrievals of volcanic sulfur dioxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10851–10879, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10851-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10851-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Deshler, T.: A review of global stratospheric aerosol: Measurements,
importance, life cycle, and local stratospheric aerosol, Atmos.
Res., 90, 223–232, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Deshler, T., Anderson-Sprecher, R., Jäger, H., Barnes, J., Hofmann, D.
J., Clemesha, B., Simonich, D., Osborn, M., Grainger, R. G., and Godin-Beekmann,
S.: Trends in the nonvolcanic component of stratospheric aerosol over the
period 1971–2004, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D01201,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006089</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Drewnick, F., Hings, S. S., DeCarlo, P., Jayne, J. T., Gonin, M., Fuhrer,
K., Weimer, S., Jimenez, J. L., Demerjian, K. L., Borrmann, S., and Worsnop, D.
R.: A New Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (TOF-AMS) – Instrument
Description and First Field Deployment, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39,
637–658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500182040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500182040</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
English, J. M., Toon, O. B., Mills, M. J., and Yu, F.: Microphysical simulations of new particle formation in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9303–9322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9303-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9303-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Durrant, T., Boca, R.,
Maianti, P., Libertà, G., Artés Vivancos, T., Oom, D., Branco, A.,
Tomàs. Rigo, D., Ferrari, D., Pfeiffer, H., Grecchi, R., Nuijten, D.,
Onida, M., and Löffler, P.: Forest Fires in Europe, Middle East and North
Africa 2020, Publications Office of the European Union, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2760/216446" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2760/216446</a>,
2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Fiedler, V., Nau, R., Ludmann, S., Arnold, F., Schlager, H., and Stohl, A.: East Asian SO<sub>2</sub> pollution plume over Europe – Part 1: Airborne trace gas measurements and source identification by particle dispersion model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4717–4728, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4717-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4717-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fischer, H., Wienhold, F. G., Hoor, P., Bujok, O., Schiller, C., Siegmund,
P., Ambaum, M., Scheeren, H. A., and Lelieveld, J.: Tracer correlations in the
northern high latitude lowermost stratosphere: Influence of cross-tropopause
mass exchange, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 97–100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010879" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010879</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fromm, M., Bevilacqua, R., Servranckx, R., Rosen, J., Thayer, J. P., Herman,
J., and Larko, D.: Pyro-cumulonimbus injection of smoke to the stratosphere:
Observations and impact of a super blowup in northwestern Canada on 3–4
August 1998, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D08205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005350" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005350</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fueglistaler, S., Dessler, A. E., Dunkerton, T. J., Folkins, I., Fu, Q., and Mote, P. W.: Tropical tropopause layer, Rev. Geophys., 47, RG1004, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000267" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000267</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gottschaldt, K.-D., Schlager, H., Baumann, R., Bozem, H., Eyring, V., Hoor, P., Jöckel, P., Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.: Trace gas composition in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone: a case study based on aircraft observations and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6091–6111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6091-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6091-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Gottschaldt, K.-D., Schlager, H., Baumann, R., Cai, D. S., Eyring, V., Graf, P., Grewe, V., Jöckel, P., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Voigt, C., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.: Dynamics and composition of the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5655–5675, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5655-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5655-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
HALO:
Mission: BLUESKY, HALO [data set], available upon request, <a href="https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/mission/119" target="_blank"/>, last access: 22 November 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hamryszczak, Z. T., Pozzer, A., Obersteiner, F., Bohn, B., Steil, B., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Distribution of hydrogen peroxide over Europe during the BLUESKY aircraft campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9483–9497, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9483-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9483-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hedelt, P., Efremenko, D. S., Loyola, D. G., Spurr, R., and Clarisse, L.: Sulfur dioxide layer height retrieval from Sentinel-5 Precursor/TROPOMI using FP_ILM, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5503–5517, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5503-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5503-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hegglin, M. I., Boone, C. D., Manney, G. L., and Walker, K. A.: A global
view of the extratropical tropopause transition layer from Atmospheric
Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer O3, H2O, and CO, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00B11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009984" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009984</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hoor, P., Fischer, H., Lange, L., Lelieveld, J., and Brunner, D.: Seasonal
variations of a mixing layer in the lowermost stratosphere as identified by
the CO-O<sub>3</sub> correlation from in situ measurements, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 107, ACL 1-1–ACL 1-11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000289" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000289</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Junge, C. E., Chagnon, C. W., and Manson, J. E.: Stratospheric aerosols,
J. Atmos. Sci., 18, 81–108, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Arnold, F., Schlager, H., Aufmhoff, H., Schmale, J.,
Schneider, J., Lichtenstern, M., and Dörnbrack, A.: Airborne stratospheric
ITCIMS measurements of SO<sub>2</sub>, HCl, and HNO<sub>3</sub> in the aged plume of volcano
Kasatochi, J. Geophys. Res., 115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd013890" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd013890</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Arnold, F., Schlager, H., Kleffmann, J., Aufmhoff,
H., Schäuble, D., Schaefer, M., and Schumann, U.: Measurements of HONO, NO,
NOy and SO<sub>2</sub> in aircraft exhaust plumes at cruise, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 38, L10807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl046884" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl046884</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Kaufmann, S., Zahn, A., Sprenger, M., Hoor, P.,
Bozem, H., Müller, S., Dörnbrack, A., Schlager, H., Bönisch, H., and
Engel, A.: A quantitative analysis of stratospheric HCl, HNO<sub>3</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub> in the
tropopause region near the subtropical jet, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
41, 3315–3321, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl059159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl059159</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, S., Voigt, C., Schäuble, D., Jeßberger, P., and Ziereis, H.: The airborne mass spectrometer AIMS – Part 2: Measurements of trace gases with stratospheric or tropospheric origin in the UTLS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1907–1923, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1907-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1907-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kanamitsu, M.: Description of the NMC Global Data Assimilation and Forecast
System, Weather Forecast., 4, 335–342,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:Dotngd&gt;2.0.Co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:Dotngd&gt;2.0.Co;2</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kaufmann, S., Voigt, C., Heller, R., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Zöger, M., Giez, A., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Thornberry, T., and Schumann, U.: Intercomparison of midlatitude tropospheric and lower-stratospheric water vapor measurements and comparison to ECMWF humidity data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16729–16745, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16729-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16729-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkby, J., Curtius, J., Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kürten, A.,
Ortega, I. K., Kupiainen-Määttä, O., Praplan, A. P., Adamov, A.,
Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Donahue,
N. M., Downard, A., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R and
Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Franchin, A., Gagné, S., Ickes,
L., Kürten, A., Kupc, A., Metzger, A., Riccobono, F., Rondo, L.,
Schobesberger, S., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Wimmer, D., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F.,
Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Downard, A., Ehn, M., Flagan, R.
C., Haider, S., Hansel, A., Hauser, D., Jud, W., Junninen, H., Kreissl, F.,
Kvashin, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Lima, J., Lovejoy, E. R.,
Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Mikkilä, J., Minginette, P., Mogo, S.,
Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Pereira, P., Petäjä, T., Schnitzhofer, R.,
Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A.,
Vanhanen, J., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Walther, H.,
Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Winkler, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Worsnop, D. R.,
Baltensperger, U., and Kulmala, M.: Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia and galactic
cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Nature, 476, 429–433,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Klausner, T., Mertens, M., Huntrieser, H., Galkowski, M., Kuhlmann, G.,
Baumann, R., Fiehn, A., Jöckel, P., Pühl, M., and Roiger, A.: Urban
greenhouse gas emissions from the Berlin area: A case study using airborne
CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> in situ observations in summer 2018, Elementa, 8, 15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.411" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.411</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kloss, C., Berthet, G., Sellitto, P., Ploeger, F., Taha, G., Tidiga, M., Eremenko, M., Bossolasco, A., Jégou, F., Renard, J.-B., and Legras, B.: Stratospheric aerosol layer perturbation caused by the 2019 Raikoke and Ulawun eruptions and their radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 535–560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-535-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-535-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T.,
Anderson-Sprecher, R., Jäger, H., Barnes, J., Hofmann, D. J., Clemesha,
B., Simonich, D., Osborn, M., Grainger, R. G., Godin-Beekmann, S., Timmreck,
C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A., Schwarz, J. P., and Weigel, R.: Stratospheric
aerosol – Observations, processes, and impact on climate, J. Rev.
Geophys., 54, 278–335, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Krippner, J. B. and Venzke, E. (Eds.): Global Volcanism Program,
Report on Taal (Philippines) Bulletin of the Global Volcanism Network, 45-6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5479/si.GVP.BGVN202006-273070" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5479/si.GVP.BGVN202006-273070</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Krüger, O. O., Holanda, B. A., Chowdhury, S., Pozzer, A., Walter, D., Pöhlker, C., Andrés Hernández, M. D., Burrows, J. P., Voigt, C., Lelieveld, J., Quaas, J., Pöschl, U., and Pöhlker, M. L.: Black carbon aerosol reductions during COVID-19 confinement quantified by aircraft measurements over Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8683–8699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8683-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8683-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, C., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Lee, H., Dickerson, R. R., Hains,
J. C., Krotkov, N., Richter, A., Vinnikov, K., and Schwab, J. J.: SO<sub>2</sub> emissions
and lifetimes: Estimates from inverse modeling using in situ and global,
space-based (SCIAMACHY and OMI) observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 116, D06304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014758" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014758</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Skowron, A., Allen, M. R., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q.,
Doherty, S. J., Freeman, S., Forster, P. M., and Fuglestvedt, J.: The contribution
of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018, J
Atmos. Environ., 244, 117834, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, D. S., Pitari, G., Grewe, V., Gierens, K., Penner, J. E., Petzold, A.,
Prather, M. J., Schumann, U., Bais, A., and Berntsen, T.: Transport impacts on
atmosphere and climate: Aviation, J. Atmos. Environ., 44, 4678–4734,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Lelieveld, J.: Multi-phase processes in the atmospheric sulfur cycle, in:
Interactions of C, N, P and S biogeochemical cycles and global change, edited by: Wollast, R., Mackenzie, F. T., and Chou, L.,
Springer, 305–331, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76064-8_13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76064-8_13</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, F., Xing, C., Li, J., Wang, B., Chai, J., Gao, C., Huang, G., Liu, J., and
Chen, D.: Could the Recent Taal Volcano Eruption Trigger an El Niño and
Lead to Eurasian Warming?, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 37, 663–670,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-2041-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-2041-z</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Marsing, A.: Chlorine Partitioning in the Lowermost Arctic Stratosphere During Winter-an Aircraft in Situ Measurement Perspective, Dissertation, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, 104 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-6263" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-6263</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Marsing, A., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Grooß, J.-U., Kaufmann, S., Heller, R., Engel, A., Hoor, P., Krause, J., and Voigt, C.: Chlorine partitioning in the lowermost Arctic vortex during the cold winter 2015/2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10757–10772, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10757-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10757-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Martinsson, B. G., Papaspiropoulos, G., Heintzenberg, J., and Hermann, M. J.
G. R. L.: Fine mode participate sulphur in the tropopause region measured
from intercontinental flights (CARIBIC), Geophys. Res. Lett., 28,
1175–1178, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Martinsson, B. G., Nguyen, H. N., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Zahn, A.,
Heintzenberg, J., Hermann, M., and van Velthoven, P. F. J.: Characteristics
and origin of lowermost stratospheric aerosol at northern midlatitudes under
volcanically quiescent conditions based on CARIBIC observations, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D12201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005644" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005644</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Martinsson, B. G., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Carn, S. A., Hermann, M., Heue,
K.-P., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.: Influence of the 2008
Kasatochi volcanic eruption on sulfurous and carbonaceous aerosol
constituents in the lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L12813,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038735" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038735</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
McCormick, M. P., Thomason, L. W., and Trepte, C. R.: Atmospheric effects of
the Mt Pinatubo eruption, Nature, 373, 399–404, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, M., Brook, P., and Eyers, C.: Reduction of Sulphur Limits in Aviation Fuel Standards (SULPHUR), European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), <a href="https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/2009-SULPHUR-Reduction of sulphur limits in aviation fuel standards-Final Report.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/2009-SULPHUR-Reduction of sulphur limits in aviation fuel standards-Final Report.pdf</a> (last access: 11 February 2022), 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Molleker, S., Helleis, F., Klimach, T., Appel, O., Clemen, H.-C., Dragoneas, A., Gurk, C., Hünig, A., Köllner, F., Rubach, F., Schulz, C., Schneider, J., and Borrmann, S.: Application of an O-ring pinch device as a constant-pressure inlet (CPI) for airborne sampling, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3651–3660, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3651-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3651-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Morgan, W. T., Allan, J. D., Bower, K. N., Capes, G., Crosier, J., Williams, P. I., and Coe, H.: Vertical distribution of sub-micron aerosol chemical composition from North-Western Europe and the North-East Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5389–5401, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5389-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5389-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D., Froyd, K., Schwarz, J., and Wilson, J.: Observations of the
chemical composition of stratospheric aerosol particles, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 1269–1278, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Nussbaumer, C. M., Pozzer, A., Tadic, I., Röder, L., Obersteiner, F., Harder, H., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Tropospheric ozone production and chemical regime analysis during the COVID-19 lockdown over Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6151–6165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6151-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6151-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Ohneiser, K., Ansmann, A., Chudnovsky, A., Engelmann, R., Ritter, C., Veselovskii, I., Baars, H., Gebauer, H., Griesche, H., Radenz, M., Hofer, J., Althausen, D., Dahlke, S., and Maturilli, M.: The unexpected smoke layer in the High Arctic winter stratosphere during MOSAiC 2019–2020 , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15783–15808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15783-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15783-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Osborne, M. J., de Leeuw, J., Witham, C., Schmidt, A., Beckett, F., Kristiansen, N., Buxmann, J., Saint, C., Welton, E. J., Fochesatto, J., Gomes, A. R., Bundke, U., Petzold, A., Marenco, F., and Haywood, J.: The 2019 Raikoke volcanic eruption – Part 2: Particle-phase dispersion and concurrent wildfire smoke emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2975–2997, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2975-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2975-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, L. L., Randel, W. J., Gary, B. L., Mahoney, M. J., and Hintsa, E. J.:
Definitions and sharpness of the extratropical tropopause: A trace gas
perspective, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004982" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004982</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Peterson, D. A., Campbell, J. R., Hyer, E. J., Fromm, M. D., Kablick, G. P.,
Cossuth, J. H., and DeLand, M. T.: Wildfire-driven thunderstorms cause a
volcano-like stratospheric injection of smoke, npj Climate and Atmospheric
Science, 1, 30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Walker, K., and Riese, M.: Quantifying pollution
transport from the Asian monsoon anticyclone into the lower stratosphere,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7055-7066, 10.5194/acp-17-7055-2017, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Reifenberg, S. F., Martin, A., Kohl, M., Bacer, S., Hamryszczak, Z., Tadic, I., Röder, L., Crowley, D. J., Fischer, H., Kaiser, K., Schneider, J., Dörich, R., Crowley, J. N., Tomsche, L., Marsing, A., Voigt, C., Zahn, A., Pöhlker, C., Holanda, B. A., Krüger, O., Pöschl, U., Pöhlker, M., Jöckel, P., Dorf, M., Schumann, U., Williams, J., Bohn, B., Curtius, J., Harder, H., Schlager, H., Lelieveld, J., and Pozzer, A.: Numerical simulation of the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on tropospheric composition and aerosol radiative forcing in Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10901–10917, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10901-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10901-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Rolph, G., Stein, A., and Stunder, B.: Real-time Environmental Applications
and Display sYstem: READY, Environ. Modell. Softw., 95,
210–228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Schäfer, S., Lawrence, M., Stelzer, H., Born, W., Low, S., Aaheim, A., Adriázola, P., Betz, G., Boucher, O., Carius, A., Devine-Right, P., Gullberg, A. T., Haszeldine, S., Haywood, J., Houghton, K., Ibarrola, R., Irvine, P., Kristjansson, J.-E., Lenton, T., Link, J. S. A., Maas, A., Meyer, L., Muri, H., Oschlies, A., Proelß, A., Rayner, T., Rickels, W., Ruthner, L., Scheffran, J., Schmidt, H., Schulz, M., Scott, V., Shackley, S., Tänzler, D., Watson, M., and Vaughan, N.: The European transdisciplinary assessment of climate engineering (EuTRACE): Removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight away from Earth, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam (IASS) e.V, <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002D-E568-C" target="_blank"/> (last access: 23 November 2022), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Schiller, C. L., Bozem, H., Gurk, C., Parchatka, U., Königstedt, R.,
Harris, G. W., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Applications of quantum cascade
lasers for sensitive trace gas measurements of CO, CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and HCHO,
Appl. Phys. B, 92, 419–430, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3125-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3125-0</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Schmale, J., Schneider, J., Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Kalesse, H., Rautenhaus,
M., Lichtenstern, M., Schlager, H., Ancellet, G., Arnold, F., Gerding, M.,
Mattis, I., Wendisch, M., and Borrmann, S.: Aerosol layers from the 2008
eruptions of Mount Okmok and Mount Kasatochi: In situ upper troposphere and
lower stratosphere measurements of sulfate and organics over Europe, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00L07, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013628" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013628</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Schneider, J., Hings, S. S., Hock, N. B., Weimer, S., Borrmann, S., Fiebig,
M., Petzold, A., Busen, R., and Kärcher, B.: Aircraft-based operation of an
aerosol mass spectrometer: Measurements of tropospheric aerosol composition,
J. Aerosol Sci., 37, 839–857, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.07.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.07.002</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Schneider, J., Weigel, R., Klimach, T., Dragoneas, A., Appel, O., Hünig, A., Molleker, S., Köllner, F., Clemen, H.-C., Eppers, O., Hoppe, P., Hoor, P., Mahnke, C., Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Grooß, J.-U., Zahn, A., Obersteiner, F., Ravegnani, F., Ulanovsky, A., Schlager, H., Scheibe, M., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., Nowak, J. B., Zöger, M., and Borrmann, S.: Aircraft-based observation of meteoric material in lower-stratospheric aerosol particles between 15 and 68°&thinsp;N, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 989–1013, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-989-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-989-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Schulte, P. and Schlager, H.: In-flight measurements of cruise altitude
nitric oxide emission indices of commercial jet aircraft, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 23, 165–168, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL03691" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL03691</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, C., Schneider, J., Amorim Holanda, B., Appel, O., Costa, A., de Sá, S. S., Dreiling, V., Fütterer, D., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Klimach, T., Knote, C., Krämer, M., Martin, S. T., Mertes, S., Pöhlker, M. L., Sauer, D., Voigt, C., Walser, A., Weinzierl, B., Ziereis, H., Zöger, M., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Machado, L. A. T., Pöschl, U., Wendisch, M., and Borrmann, S.: Aircraft-based observations of isoprene-epoxydiol-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA) in the tropical upper troposphere over the Amazon region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14979–15001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14979-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14979-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Schumann, U., Bugliaro, L., Dörnbrack, A., Baumann, R., and Voigt, C.:
Aviation Contrail Cirrus and Radiative Forcing Over Europe During 6 Months
of COVID-19, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL092771, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092771" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092771</a>, 2021a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Schumann, U., Poll, I., Teoh, R., Koelle, R., Spinielli, E., Molloy, J., Koudis, G. S., Baumann, R., Bugliaro, L., Stettler, M., and Voigt, C.: Air traffic and contrail changes over Europe during COVID-19: a model study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7429–7450, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7429-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7429-2021</a>, 2021b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, 2nd Edn., John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Sheng, J.-X., Weisenstein, D. K., Luo, B.-P., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Anet,
J., Bingemer, H., and Peter, T.: Global atmospheric sulfur budget under
volcanically quiescent conditions: Aerosol-chemistry-climate model
predictions and validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
120, 256–276, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021985" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021985</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S., Daniel, J. S., Neely III, R. R., Vernier, J. P., Dutton, E. G., and Thomason, L. W.: The persistently variable “background” stratospheric aerosol layer and global climate change, Science, 333, 866–870, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Speidel, M., Nau, R., Arnold, F., Schlager, H., and Stohl, A.: Sulfur
dioxide measurements in the lower, middle and upper troposphere: Deployment
of an aircraft-based chemical ionization mass spectrometer with permanent
in-flight calibration, Atmos. Environ., 41, 2427–2437,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.047</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J., Cohen, M. D., and
Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling
system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Stockwell, W. R. and Calvert, J. G.: The mechanism of the HO-SO<sub>2</sub> reaction,
Atmos. Environ., 17, 2231–2235, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(83)90220-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(83)90220-2</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Thouret, V., Cammas, J.-P., Sauvage, B., Athier, G., Zbinden, R., Nédélec, P., Simon, P., and Karcher, F.: Tropopause referenced ozone climatology and inter-annual variability (1994–2003) from the MOZAIC programme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1033–1051, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1033-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1033-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Tomsche, L., Pozzer, A., Ojha, N., Parchatka, U., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Upper tropospheric CH<sub>4</sub> and CO affected by the South Asian summer monsoon during the Oxidation Mechanism Observations mission, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1915–1939, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1915-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1915-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
van Heerwaarden, C. C., Mol, W. B., Veerman, M. A., Benedict, I.,
Heusinkveld, B. G., Knap, W. H., Kazadzis, S., Kouremeti, N., and Fiedler, S.:
Record high solar irradiance in Western Europe during first COVID-19
lockdown largely due to unusual weather, Commun. Earth
Environ., 2, 37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00110-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00110-0</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, B., Günther, G., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Hoor, P., Krämer, M., Müller, S., Zahn, A., and Riese, M.: Fast transport from Southeast Asia boundary layer sources to northern Europe: rapid uplift in typhoons and eastward eddy shedding of the Asian monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12745–12762, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12745-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12745-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, B., Günther, G., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Afchine, A., Bozem, H., Hoor, P., Krämer, M., Müller, S., Riese, M., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Stiller, G. P., Ungermann, J., and Zahn, A.: Long-range transport pathways of tropospheric source gases originating in Asia into the northern lower stratosphere during the Asian monsoon season 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15301–15325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15301-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15301-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, B., Müller, R., Günther, G., Spang, R., Hanumanthu, S., Li, D., Riese, M., and Stiller, G. P.: Lagrangian simulations of the transport of young air masses to the top of the Asian monsoon anticyclone and into the tropical pipe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6007–6034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6007-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6007-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Voigt, C., Schumann, U., Jurkat, T., Schäuble, D., Schlager, H., Petzold, A., Gayet, J.-F., Krämer, M., Schneider, J., Borrmann, S., Schmale, J., Jessberger, P., Hamburger, T., Lichtenstern, M., Scheibe, M., Gourbeyre, C., Meyer, J., Kübbeler, M., Frey, W., Kalesse, H., Butler, T., Lawrence, M. G., Holzäpfel, F., Arnold, F., Wendisch, M., Döpelheuer, A., Gottschaldt, K., Baumann, R., Zöger, M., Sölch, I., Rautenhaus, M., and Dörnbrack, A.: In-situ observations of young contrails – overview and selected results from the CONCERT campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9039–9056, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9039-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9039-2010</a>, 2010.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Voigt, C., Jessberger, P., Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, S., Baumann, R., Schlager,
H., Bobrowski, N., Giuffrida, G., and Salerno, G.: Evolution of CO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, HCl,
and HNO<sub>3</sub> in the volcanic plumes from Etna, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,
2196–2203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl058974" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl058974</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Voigt, C., Lelieveld, J., Schlager, H., Schneider, J., Curtius, J.,
Meerkötter, R., Sauer, D., Bugliaro, L., Bohn, B., Crowley, J. N.,
Erbertseder, T., Groß, S., Hahn, V., Li, Q., Mertens, M.,
Pöhlker, M. L., Pozzer, A., Schumann, U., Tomsche, L., Williams, J.,
Zahn, A., Andreae, M., Borrmann, S., Bräuer, T., Dörich, R.,
Dörnbrack, A., Edtbauer, A., Ernle, L., Fischer, H., Giez, A., Granzin,
M., Grewe, V., Harder, H., Heinritzi, M., Holanda, B. A., Jöckel, P.,
Kaiser, K., Krüger, O. O., Lucke, J., Marsing, A., Martin, A., Matthes,
S., Pöhlker, C., Pöschl, U., Reifenberg, S., Ringsdorf, A., Scheibe,
M., Tadic, I., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Henke, R., and Rapp, M.: Cleaner skies
during the COVID-19 lockdown, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 103, E1796–E1827, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-21-0012.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-21-0012.1</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
von Hobe, M., Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Kloss, C., Ulanowski, A., Yushkov, V., Ravegnani, F., Volk, C. M., Pan, L. L., Honomichl, S. B., Tilmes, S., Kinnison, D. E., Garcia, R. R., and Wright, J. S.: Upward transport into and within the Asian monsoon anticyclone as inferred from StratoClim trace gas observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1267–1285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Williamson, C. J., Kupc, A., Rollins, A., Kazil, J., Froyd, K. D., Ray, E. A., Murphy, D. M., Schill, G. P., Peischl, J., Thompson, C., Bourgeois, I., Ryerson, T. B., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., Blake, D. R., Bui, T. P. V., Dollner, M., Weinzierl, B., and Brock, C. A.: Large hemispheric difference in nucleation mode aerosol concentrations in the lowermost stratosphere at mid- and high latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9065–9088, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9065-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9065-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Zahn, A., Weppner, J., Widmann, H., Schlote-Holubek, K., Burger, B., Kühner, T., and Franke, H.: A fast and precise chemiluminescence ozone detector for eddy flux and airborne application, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 363–375, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-363-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-363-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Ziereis, H., Schlager, H., Schulte, P., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Slemr,
F.: Distributions of NO, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, and NO<sub><i>y</i></sub> in the upper troposphere and lower
stratosphere between 28° and 61°&thinsp;N during POLINAT 2,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 3653–3664, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900870" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900870</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
