<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-14931-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>The Urmia playa as a source of airborne dust and ice-nucleating particles – Part 2: Unraveling the <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>relationship between soil dust composition<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> and ice nucleation activity</article-title><alt-title>Urmia playa soil dust composition and ice nucleation activity – Part 2</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Urmia playa soil dust composition and ice nucleation activity -- Part 2}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{N. Hamzehpour et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Hamzehpour</surname><given-names>Nikou</given-names></name>
          <email>nhamzehpour@maragheh.ac.ir</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Marcolli</surname><given-names>Claudia</given-names></name>
          <email>claudia.marcolli@env.ethz.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9125-8722</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Klumpp</surname><given-names>Kristian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Thöny</surname><given-names>Debora</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Peter</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Maragheh, P.O. Box 83111-55181, Iran</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1-5, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Nikou Hamzehpour (nhamzehpour@maragheh.ac.ir)<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> and Claudia
Marcolli (claudia.marcolli@env.ethz.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>November</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>14931</fpage><lpage>14956</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>26</day><month>July</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>October</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>October</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e146">Ice-nucleating particles (INPs) originating from deserts, semi-arid regions,
and dried lakebeds may cause heterogeneous ice nucleation, impacting cloud
properties. Recently, due to climate change and water scarcity, abandoned
agricultural lands with little surficial crust and negligible vegetation
cover have become an increasing source of atmospheric dust worldwide.
Unlike deserts, these areas are rich in soluble salt and (bio-)organic
compounds. Using soil samples from various sites of the Lake Urmia playa
(LUP) in northwestern Iran and airborne dusts collected at nearby
meteorological stations, we elucidate how minerals, soluble salts, and organic
matter interact to determine the IN activity of saline soils and dust. X-ray
powder diffraction shows that the mineralogical composition is dominated by
K-feldspars (microcline), quartz, carbonates, and clay minerals. The samples
were stripped stepwise of organic matter, carbonates, and soluble salts.
After each removal step, the ice nucleation (IN) activity was quantified in
terms of onset freezing temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and heterogeneously frozen
fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) by emulsion freezing experiments using differential
scanning calorimetry (DSC). We examined the influence of soluble salts and
pH on microcline and quartz in emulsion freezing experiments, comparing
these with reference suspensions of microcline and quartz exposed to salt
concentrations and pH levels characteristic of the LUP samples. These analyses,
combined with correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, allow us to
identify the components that contribute to or inhibit IN activity. The LUP
dusts turn out to be very good INPs, with freezing onset temperatures around
248 K in immersion freezing experiments. Interestingly, their IN activity
proves to be dominated by the relatively small share of (bio-)organic matter
(1 %–5.3 %). After organic matter removal, the remaining IN activity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">244</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K) can be traced back to the clay fraction, because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlate positively with the clay mineral content but negatively with quartz and microcline. We attribute the inability of quartz and microcline to act as INPs to the basic pH of the LUP samples as well as to the presence of soluble salts. After additionally removing soluble salts and carbonates, the IN activity of the samples increased again significantly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">249</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K), and the negative correlation with quartz and microcline turned into a slightly positive one. Removing carbonates and salts from the natural samples leads to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as well, indicating that their presence also suppresses the IN activity of the (bio-)organic INPs. Overall, this study demonstrates that mineral and organic INPs do not just add up to yield the IN activity of soil dust but that the freezing behavior is governed by inhibiting and promoting interactions between the components.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e277">The ice content in clouds determines key cloud properties such as albedo, lifetime, and precipitation formation (e.g., Lohmann, 2006; Field and Heymsfield, 2015; Mülmenstädt et al., 2015). An accurate modeling of ice formation in clouds is therefore key to estimating the Earth's
radiation budget in response to climate change (e.g., IPCC, 2021; Lohmann and
Neubauer, 2018). Ice formation through homogeneous nucleation occurs readily
within the volume of cloud droplets at temperatures below about 237 K; yet,
at higher temperatures, this process becomes too improbable to be of
relevance, and seeds are required to initiate cloud glaciation. These seeds
can be ice crystals falling from higher cloud layers to layers below through
a seeder-feeder process (Purdy et al., 2005; Ramelli et al., 2021; Proske et
al., 2021), or they can be ice-nucleating particles (INPs), which contain sites that
catalyze the formation of the ice phase (e.g., Kanji et al., 2017). The
number of airborne particles that are able to induce ice at the highest
temperatures is low but increases with decreasing temperature. Considerable
effort has been undertaken to quantify the atmospheric INP population and
its temporal fluctuation globally (e.g., Bigg, 1973; Kanji et al., 2017; Welti
et al., 2020; Brunner et al., 2021). Measurements have been performed by
means of online techniques on a single-particle level, e.g., in continuous
flow diffusion chambers (DeMott et al., 2010; Tobo et al., 2013; Lacher et
al., 2018, 2021; Welti et al., 2018, 2020; Brunner et al., 2021) or through
filter sampling with subsequent analysis of the IN activity directly on the
filters (Schrod et al., 2017; Price et al., 2018) or in drop-freezing assays
(O'Sullivan et al., 2018; Testa et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021; Welti et
al., 2018, 2020). In most of these studies, direct physicochemical
characterization of samples is limited. Usually, the types of INPs are
indirectly inferred through air mass back trajectory analysis. In some of
these studies, the sensitivity of IN activity to heat or H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
digestion is tested to infer the contribution of biogenic material to INPs
(O'Sullivan et al., 2018; Testa et al., 2021). Some studies present an
elemental characterization (Schrod et al., 2017; Welti et al., 2018; Price
et al., 2018) or fluorescence measurements to infer the presence of
biological INPs (Tobo et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e298">Alternatively, samples have been surface collected and subsequently analyzed
in drop-freezing assays (Conen et al., 2011; O'Sullivan et al., 2014; Tobo
et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2016; Suski et al., 2018) in cloud chambers
(Steinke et al., 2016, 2020) or in continuous flow diffusion chambers (Boose
et al., 2016, 2019; Paramonov et al., 2018). Here, samples are sufficiently
abundant to perform more detailed analyses and physicochemical
characterization. One major finding from these studies is that (bio-)organic
material present in soil dusts enables them to freeze water at higher
temperatures than pure mineral dust does. INPs that are active at
temperatures above 255–258 K have been ascribed to biogenic material due to
their heat lability (O'Sullivan et al., 2018) and their sensitivity to
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> digestion, through the correlation of IN activity with the
organic share of the samples, or a combination of these methods (Conen et
al., 2011; Tobo et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2016; Testa et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e319">Below 255 K, the role of (bio-)organic material as source of INPs is
unclear. Paramonov et al. (2018) found a decrease of IN activity in the
temperature range 233–243 K after removing heat-sensitive material from
soil samples; yet, the decrease in IN activity was not proportional to the
amount of organic matter present in the samples. The H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
treatment did not affect or it even enhanced IN activity of the investigated
soil samples. Boose et al. (2019) found that the mineralogical composition
determined the IN activity of most desert dust samples that they
investigated at temperatures up to 242 K, with the exception of one
carbonaceous sample, where most of the IN activity stemmed from organic
matter.</p>
      <p id="d1e340">To gain direct insight into the IN activity of aerosol constituents,
freezing experiments with surrogate samples for different types of aerosols
have been performed. Minerals and biological materials have attracted most
attention, as they are considered the dominant INP types below and above
255–258 K, respectively. In laboratory studies, diverse types of organic
and biogenic material proved to be IN active. Biological INPs include whole
bacteria, pollen, and spores, but also fragments of plants and animals (e.g.,
Morris et al., 2013; Després et al., 2012; Kanji et al., 2017). Moreover, organic macromolecules of biological origin – such as proteinaceous material (e.g., Huang et al., 2021), humic and fulvic substances (Fornea et al., 2009: Wang and Knopf, 2011;
Borduas-Dedekind et al., 2019), cellulose (Hiranuma et al., 2015a, 2019),
polysaccharides (Steinke et al., 2020), and lignin (Bogler and
Borduas-Dedekind, 2020; Steinke et al., 2020) – also proved to be IN active.</p>
      <p id="d1e344">Among the minerals present in atmospheric dust (e.g., Murray et al., 2012;
Kanji et al., 2017), feldspars, clay minerals, and quartz are considered
most relevant as INPs. Other common minerals like calcite, dolomite, and
micas proved to be hardly IN active (e.g., Kaufmann et al., 2016). Among the
feldspars, K-feldspars showed higher IN activity than Na–Ca feldspars
(e.g., Zolles et al., 2015; Kaufmann et al., 2016; Harrison et al., 2016,
2019; Kumar et al., 2019b; Welti et al., 2019); in particular, microcline
remained IN active up to the highest temperatures observed for mineral
particles (e.g., Atkinson et al., 2013; Kaufmann et al., 2016; Welti et al., 2019). Yet, the IN activity of feldspars also proved to be highly sensitive
to the presence of solutes: while low concentrations of ammonia and ammonium
ions enhanced it, alkali ions and acids deteriorated it (Kumar et al., 2018,
2019b; Whale et al., 2018; Perkins et al., 2020; Yun et al., 2020).
Reference quartz samples showed high IN activity, but only after being
freshly milled. This indicates that IN-active sites on quartz depend on its
surface structure and are most probably related to defects (Zolles et al., 2015; Kumar et al., 2019b). Clay minerals dominate the submicron fraction of
atmospheric dust and can be transported over long distances and even between
continents (e.g., Murray et al., 2012). All clay minerals that have been
tested as INPs so far – that is, kaolinite, montmorillonite, and illite – proved to be
IN active, though at lower temperatures than K-feldspars and quartz (e.g.,
Pinti et al., 2012; Hoose and Möhler, 2012; Hiranuma et al., 2015b;
Kanji et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e347">Only few studies have tried to relate the IN activity of natural samples
with their mineralogical composition (O'Sullivan et al., 2014; Kaufmann et
al., 2016; Boose et al., 2016; Paramonov et al., 2018). Kaufmann et al. (2016) were able to explain the freezing behavior of most of their
surface-collected dust samples by their mineralogical composition. Boose et
al. (2016, 2019) found a correlation between the IN activity of dust samples
sourced from different deserts and their quartz and feldspar content. Yet,
some of the samples were milled prior to performing freezing experiments,
which might have enhanced the IN activity of quartz (Zolles et al., 2015;
Kumar et al., 2019a). Paramonov et al. (2018) found a good correlation of IN
activity with total feldspar and K-feldspar content of surface-collected
dust. A relationship between mineralogical composition and IN activity was
also observed by O'Sullivan et al. (2014) for temperatures below 255 K.</p>
      <p id="d1e350">Different parameterizations to quantify the immersion freezing of dust
particles have been proposed. Niemand et al. (2012) developed a
parameterization of ice-active site density per surface area from cloud
chamber measurements of desert dust samples. The parameterization proposed
by DeMott et al. (2015) is based on laboratory studies and atmospheric
measurements of dust representative of Saharan and Asian desert sources and
links the prediction of INP number concentrations to particle number
concentrations of sizes larger than 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These parameterizations
premise that, to a first order, mineral dust may be assumed to be one particle
type. Alternatively, a specific mineral type is taken to be representative for the
mineral dust fraction like K-feldspars (Atkinson et al., 2013) or illite
(Hiranuma et al., 2015b). These parameterizations have the advantage of
being simple; yet, they neglect the complexity of soil dust and potential
aging effects in the atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e363">Soil types that expand due to human influence are dried lakebeds, abandoned
agricultural land, and saline soils on the margin of drying lakes
(Abuduwaili et al., 2010; Goodman et al., 2019; Sweeney et al., 2016; Varga
et al., 2014; Perez and Gill, 2009; Washington et al., 2006; Prospero et
al., 2002). Such soils contribute significantly to aerosols locally,
regionally, and potentially globally, as exemplified by the enormous amounts
of dust that are deflated annually from the Aral Sea in Kazakhstan and
Uzbekistan and Ebinur Lake in northwestern China (Abuduwaili et al., 2010).
In this study, we focus on desiccation of Lake Urmia (LU), one of the
biggest salt lakes in the world, in the northwest of Iran. Increasing soil
salinity, which negatively affects plant growth and crop production, led to
soil erosion and land degradation (Gorji et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2019;
Scudiero et al., 2015) and resulted in the remains of vast, barren lands
composed of fine textured, lacustrine sediments (Hamzehpour et al., 2018;
Shadkam et al., 2016; Farokhnia and Morid, 2014). These saline areas with
limited vegetation cover in most parts might be highly vulnerable to
wind erosion due to their unique physicochemical characteristics. Recent
studies have indeed demonstrated the increase in the intensity of dust
storms over LUP and nearby cities (Ahmady-Birgani et al., 2020; Boroughani et al., 2019; Sotoudeheian et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e366">In the companion paper of this work (Hamzehpour et al., 2022), we identified
highly erodible playa surfaces along the western Lake Urmia playa (LUP) and
characterized four surface-collected soil samples together with airborne
dust samples from nearby meteorological stations with respect to
physicochemical properties, mineralogical composition, and IN activity.
Emulsion freezing experiments in a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC)
revealed that some of the lower concentrated suspensions of the dust samples
(2 wt %) exhibited a higher heterogeneously frozen fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of droplets than the higher concentrated samples (5 wt %). Such a reciprocal
proportionality points to interactions between sample constituents that
inhibit IN activity. Moreover, we found a negative correlation of IN
activity with K-feldspar and quartz content, which is opposite to findings
from previous studies (O'Sullivan et al., 2014; Boose et al., 2016, 2019;
Paramonov et al., 2018). To elucidate the potential contribution or
inhibition of (bio-)organic matter, minerals, and soluble salts to the IN
activity, we performed treatments to remove carbonates, soluble salts, and
organic matter from the samples. To attribute the observed change in IN
activity to specific interactions between soluble salts and minerals, we
performed reference freezing experiments with quartz and microcline
suspensions, with salt concentration and pH in the typical range of the LUP
samples. The insights gained from these treatments are the subject of this
paper.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sampling locations</title>
      <p id="d1e395">The sampling procedure has been described in detail in Part 1 of this work
(Hamzehpour et al., 2022). Here, we recapitulate the relevant information
for the present study. Four soil samples were collected from the top 5 cm
surface layer of highly wind-erodible areas from the north to the south of the Lake
Urmia playa (LUP). Together with the soil samples, airborne dust samples
were collected at meteorological stations near the soil sampling areas.
Dust samples were collected using high-volume samplers manufactured by
Graseby–Andersen (Smyrna, Georgia, USA) on a 20.3 cm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm
glass micro-fiber filter (Whatman Inc., USA) at flow rates of 1.13–1.41 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 24 h. Detailed discussion of the dust sources in the region are presented in the companion paper. Here, we just give a summary of the sampling locations in Table 1.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e432">The location of the collected dust samples and their corresponding
soil samples.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Longitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Latitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Corresponding</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Land</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Longitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Latitude</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(wrt to LU)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(N)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">soil sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(N)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(s)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Salmas (Sa)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Soil Sa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AAL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jabal (Jab)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Northwest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>34<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Soil Jab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Sa-Sh</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Merang (Mer)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">West</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>47<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Soil Mer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Sa-SC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>07<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>47<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Miandoab (MD)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">South</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>04<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Soil MD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SC-CF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>06<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e435">AAL: abandoned agricultural lands; Sa-Sh: sand sheets; Sa-SC: sandy salt
crusts; SC-CF: salt crusts-clay flats.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Physicochemical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1126">A detailed characterization of the samples has been given and discussed in
Part 1 of this work (Hamzehpour et al., 2022). Here, we summarize the
applied methods and replicate the findings with relevance to this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e1129">The soil samples were passed through a 2 mm sieve and, along with the dust
samples, their physicochemical properties were determined, as summarized in
Table 2. Soil electrical conductivity (EC) and acidity (pH) were measured in
a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil to water suspension using a Jenway conductivity meter (model 4510) and VWR Symphony SB70P pH meter, respectively (Rhoades, 1996). In addition, soil organic carbon (OC) was measured using a wet oxidation
technique (Nelson and Sommers, 1996) and converted to organic matter (OM) by
multiplying by a factor of 2. Soil total carbonates were determined
through back titration of the remaining HCl (Sparks et al., 2020).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1147">Physicochemical properties of the studied natural dust samples and
surface-collected soil samples.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">OM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">pH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">Particle size classes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(dS m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">(%) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Clay</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Silt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(2–50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(50–2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil Sa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">64</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust Sa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">63.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">35.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil Jab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">91.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust Jab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">97</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil Mer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">59.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">31.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust Mer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">86.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil MD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">83.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust MD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">79.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1150">EC: electrical conductivity; TC: total carbonates; OM: organic matter.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Quantitative mineralogy</title>
      <p id="d1e1564">The mineralogical composition of the bulk dust samples and surface-collected
soil samples was investigated with X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (Bish
and Plötze, 2010) followed by quantitative Rietveld analysis. More
details are given in Part 1 (Hamzehpour et al., 2022). We replicate the
results in Table 3.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1570">Mineralogical composition of natural soil and dust samples in percent,
derived from Rietveld analysis of the XRD patterns (after Hamzehpour et al., 2022).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Minerals</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Soil Sa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Dust Sa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Soil Jab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Dust Jab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Soil Mer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Dust Mer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Soil MD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Dust MD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Quartz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K-feldspar (microcline)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Na-plagioclase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hornblende</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total silicates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">49.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">52.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">54.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">47.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Calcite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dolomite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aragonite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Magnesite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total carbonates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">21.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">13.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kaolinite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Smectite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Palygorskite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chlorite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total clay minerals</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">37.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">20.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">23.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mica</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Serpentine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total phyllosilicates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">49.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">33.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">27.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">32.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gypsum</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Halite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Magnetite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Thermogravimetric analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e3347">Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
of soil and dust samples smaller than 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured on a STA 449 F5 Jupiter from Netzsch  coupled to a QMS 403 D Aëolos mass
spectrometer. The gas flow was set to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mL Ar min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
20 mL O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to obtain an atmospheric mixture. A soil or dust sample (10–20 mg) was placed in an Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> crucible and heated up with a heating rate of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 40 to  1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. In TGA thermograms, the region 120–190 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is a transition between endothermic water loss and exothermic organic matter oxidation. The data were analyzed and plotted with the Proteus software from Netzsch.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Ice nucleation activity of treated soil and dust samples</title>
      <p id="d1e3472">A statistical design with six treatments, each with one replication, was used
to study the effects of soluble salt removal (SR), carbonates removal (CR),
and organic matter removal (OMR) on the IN activity of soil and dust samples, as
illustrated in Fig. 1. Untreated samples (natural samples) are used as the
reference. Apart from the single treatments, combined treatments of salt and
carbonate removal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CR</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), salt and organic matter removal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OMR</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and carbonate, salt, and organic matter removal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OMR</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were performed. The combined organic matter and carbonates removal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>OMR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CR</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was excluded from further analysis, because the measurement of electrical conductivity of the thus-treated samples revealed a concomitant major loss of salts, making them similar to the combined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OMR</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-treated samples.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3545">Diagram of treatments used to investigate the role of soil-soluble
salts, carbonates, and organic matter on the IN activity of natural soil and dust
samples from LUP. SR: salt removed; CR: carbonate removed; OMR: organic
matter removed.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3554">To remove stepwise-soluble salts, carbonates, and organic matter from the
soil and dust samples, we followed the procedure described by Jackson
(1985), Kittrick and Hope (1963), and Dane and Topp (2020), as outlined
below.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1">
  <label>2.5.1</label><title>Removal of soluble salts</title>
      <p id="d1e3565">In order to remove soluble salts, samples were washed with distilled water.
The samples were suspended in distilled water and shaken for 1 min, followed
by centrifugation with 6000–7000 rpm for 5 min. A ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil to
water was found to be efficient enough for removing salts after examining
different ratios in test experiments. The procedure was repeated until the
leached-salt concentration dropped below 10 mM. After drying in an oven at
60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the samples were stored in 20 mL glass vials for further
analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS2">
  <label>2.5.2</label><title>Removal of carbonates</title>
      <p id="d1e3597">Carbonates were removed from the samples by using a 1 M sodium acetate
buffer solution with adjusted pH of 5. Careful pH monitoring is important,
because for pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the dissolution of carbonates remains incomplete, while pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can lead to the dissolution of iron hydroxides. A total of 40 mL of sodium acetate buffer solution was added to 1000 mg of each sample in a 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask and then kept at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in a water bath until
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> bubbles were no longer visible. Then, the suspension was centrifuged and the supernatant decanted. In order to prevent organic matter decomposition of the samples, the temperature should not exceed 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. This procedure was repeated until all carbonates were removed. To test whether this was the case, a small fraction of the sample was treated with 10 % HCl. If no bubbles developed, the samples were considered to be carbonate free. To remove all sodium acetate, the centrifuged and decanted samples were washed with distilled water, followed by centrifugation and decantation. The electrical conductivity of the samples was checked to make sure that the EC of the samples did not fall below the value of the untreated samples. Note that, through this procedure, the salt composition in the sample is altered, while the electrical conductivity is preserved. Finally, samples were dried in an oven at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and stored in 20 mL
glass vials for further analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS3">
  <label>2.5.3</label><title>Removal of organic matter</title>
      <p id="d1e3665">In order to remove the organic matter from the samples, 5 mL of 30 %
(wt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> wt) H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was added to a known amount of the samples in a tall, 500 mL beaker and stirred until the reaction slowed. Then, the suspension was placed in a water bath at 65–70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until the reaction ceased and the solution became clear. H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> solution was added in 5 mL portions until no more reaction was evident. Thereafter, the samples were centrifuged for 15 min in order to remove the supernatant. In case of sample dispersion, a few droplets of 0.5 M MgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were added to the sample. Finally, the samples were dried in the oven at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and stored in 20 mL glass vials for further analysis. Based on the study by Daily et al. (2022), samples needed to be heated above 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to damage the IN activity of the minerals. Therefore, we do not expect a negative effect on the IN activity of the mineral components due to the heating required to remove organic matter; yet, we cannot exclude it.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Reference experiments with the minerals microcline and quartz</title>
      <p id="d1e3757">In order to investigate the role of salt type and concentration and pH on
the IN activity of microcline and quartz, we performed experiments with a
microcline sample from North Macedonia (the same as has been used in Klumpp et al., 2022) and a quartz sample from Sigma-Aldrich (the same as has been
used in Kumar et al., 2019a), with 2 wt % and 1 wt % concentrations,
respectively. NaCl, CaCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and MgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (all Sigma-Aldrich) were
chosen as soluble salts, since they are the dominant salts in the sediments
of LUP. Concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, and 0.4 M were chosen to cover the
salinity range of the LUP samples. To investigate the combined effect of
soluble salts and pH on the IN activity of quartz and microcline, each salt
solution was adjusted to pH 5 (acidic soils without carbonates), pH 7
(neutral), and pH 8 (representative of carbonate soils) by adding small
portions of dilute NaOH or HCl solutions. Figure 2 illustrates the
combinations of salt type, salt concentration, and pH used to perform the
immersion freezing experiments with the reference microcline and quartz
samples.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>Freezing experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e3786">To characterize the average ice nucleation efficiency of both natural and
treated soil and dust samples, emulsion freezing experiments with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) Q10 from TA instruments were
performed. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction was suspended in water
(molecular bioreagent water, Sigma-Aldrich) at concentrations of 2 wt %
and 5 wt % and was sonicated for 5 min in order to minimize particle
aggregation. Emulsions were prepared by combining the suspensions with a
mixture of mineral oil and lanolin (both Sigma-Aldrich) at a ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and by stirring the mixture with a rotor–stator homogenizer (Polytron PT 1300D
with a PT-DA 1307/2EC dispersing aggregate) for 40 s at 7000 rpm. For DSC
measurements, 5 to 10 mg of emulsion were placed in an aluminum pan, and the
pan was hermetically sealed. Thermograms were registered at a rate of 1 K min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the temperature ranges of freezing and melting and evaluated in terms of the onset temperatures of the heterogeneous (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and homogeneous freezing peaks (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hom</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the heterogeneously frozen fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the melting temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">melt</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as has been explained in more detail in Kumar et al. (2018) and Klumpp et al. (2022). The stability of the emulsions was tested for some samples by subjecting them to three freezing cycles, with the first and third cycles performed with a cooling rate of 10 K min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as control cycles, following the procedure introduced by Marcolli et al. (2007). Before each experiment, emulsions were freshly prepared. Experiments were repeated at least once with a freshly prepared suspension. The average precision in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K. Uncertainties in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are, on average, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but may be much larger when heterogeneous freezing signals are weak or overlap (forming a shoulder) with the homogeneous freezing signal.</p>
      <p id="d1e3933">The same procedure was used to investigate the IN activity of the reference
minerals (microcline with 2 wt % and quartz with 1 wt %
concentrations) in combination with different solute compositions, as
described in Sect. 2.6.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3938">Statistical design of solution composition to investigate the role
of salt type, salt concentration, and pH on the IN activity of microcline
and quartz samples. The experiments were performed for suspension
concentrations of 2 wt % for microcline and 1 wt % for quartz in
solutions of the three salts NaCl, CaCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and MgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, with each
salt at the three indicated concentrations and with each concentration at
three different pH values.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Treated natural soil and dust samples</title>
      <p id="d1e3981">To investigate the impact of soluble salts, carbonates, and organic matter on
the IN activity in the immersion mode of the soil and dust samples Sa, Jab, Mer,
and MD, we removed salts (SR treatment), carbonates (CR treatments), and
organic matter (OMR treatments) from the samples in a systematic way, as
illustrated in Fig. 1. DSC thermograms of the treated samples at suspension
concentrations of 2 wt % and 5 wt % were recorded and are displayed
together with the thermograms of the untreated samples in Fig. 3 (dust
samples) and Fig. A1 in Appendix A (soil samples). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieved from the natural and treated samples are summarized in Table 4. In Figs. 4 and 5, the effects of different treatments – given as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">treated</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of treated sample minus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of natural sample) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">treated</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of treated sample divided by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of natural sample) – of each investigated dust and soil sample at 5 wt % concentrations are presented. Triangle plots of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">treated</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">treated</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2 wt % concentrations are shown in Figs. A2 and A3 in Appendix A. Finally, Fig. 6 summarizes the
effects of all treatments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4149">DSC thermograms of treated dust samples with 5 wt % <bold>(a, c, e, g)</bold> and 2 wt % <bold>(b, d, f, h)</bold> concentrations in comparison with the
untreated samples. SR: salt removed; CR: carbonate removed; OMR: organic
matter removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR: salt and carbonate removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR: salt and
organic matter removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR: salt, carbonate, and organics
removed. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Kelvin and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in fraction are displayed directly
on the curves.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4218">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for natural soil and dust samples
and each treatment at 2 wt % and 5 wt % concentrations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Conc.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Natural</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">OMR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(wt %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">247.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">248.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">249.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">246.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">249.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">247.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">247.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">248.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">248.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">249.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">246.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">249.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">246.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">248.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">247.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">248.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">249.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">246.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">249.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">247.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">248.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.625</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.755</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.775</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.640</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.795</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.670</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.720</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Salt-removed (SR) samples</title>
      <p id="d1e4846">DSC thermograms of the samples after SR treatment are shown in Figs. 3 and A1 in Appendix A in a dark orange color. For almost all samples, removing soluble salts increased the IN activity for both suspension concentrations (see Figs. 4, 6a and A2 in Appendix A): <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K from a mean value of 247.8 to 248.8 K (Table 4). In all samples, with the exception of Soil Sa, at both 5 wt % and 2 wt % concentrations (Figs. 5 and A3 in Appendix A), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased after SR treatment (see Fig. 6b). The highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value (1.69) was observed for Dust Jab at 5 wt % concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after SR versus 0.46 in the natural sample), which is the sample with the highest electrical conductivity (EC) of 43.8 dS m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 2). The smallest difference in IN activity before and after SR treatment was observed for Soil Sa, the sample with the lowest soil EC (0.85 dS m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Therefore, removing salts from this sample had almost no or even a negative effect on both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K as the average of
5 wt % and 2 wt % samples) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5036">In Part 1 of the manuscript (Hamzehpour et al., 2022), we showed that there
was a significantly negative correlation between EC as an indicator of the
presence of soluble salts and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the 5 wt % samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), implying that high soluble salt content had a negative influence on IN activity. The increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after SR treatments confirms the inhibiting effect of soluble salts on the IN activity of the investigated soil and dust samples at these concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Carbonate-removed (CR) samples</title>
      <p id="d1e5112">DSC thermograms of the samples after carbonate removal are shown in Figs. 3
and A1 in Appendix A in a black color. Similar to SR treatment, in almost all of the samples, the CR treatment increased the IN activity for both concentrations (Figs. 4, 6a, and A2 in Appendix A A). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased, on average, by 1.2 K after carbonate removal (Table 4). The highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured for Soil Sa (4.1 K for 2 wt % concentration), while the lowest one occurred in Soil MD, with a slightly negative value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K at 2 wt % concentration (Fig. A1 in Appendix A). This sample also exhibits one of the lowest total carbonate contents (TC from back titration (Table 2): 13.1 %; from mineralogical composition (Table 3): 13.1 %; from TGA-MS (Table 5): 11.95 %).</p>
      <p id="d1e5161">The CR treatment led to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all
samples (Figs. 5, 6b, and A3 in Appendix A). The highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed in Soil Jab at 2 wt % concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which exhibits one of the highest TC contents (28.5 %), and the lowest value belonged to Dust MD at 2 wt % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which has one of the lowest TC contents (13.5 % in Table 2).</p>
      <p id="d1e5268">In Part 1 (Hamzehpour et al., 2022) of the manuscript, we showed that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the natural samples are negatively correlated to TC and pH. The increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after carbonate removal confirms this negative correlation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e5296">Effects of treatments in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">treatment</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for dust and soil samples at 5 wt %
concentration. SR: salt removed; CR: carbonate removed; OMR: organic matter
removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR: salt and carbonate removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR: salt and organic
matter removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR: salt-, carbonate-, and organics-removed
treatments.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e5360">Effects of treatments in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">treatment</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for soil and dust samples at 5 wt % concentration. SR: salt removed; CR: carbonate removed; OMR: organic matter removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR: salt and carbonate removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR: salt and organic matter removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR: salt-, carbonate-, and organics-removed treatments.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5422"><bold>(a)</bold> Effect of treatments on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Points above 0 (shown as dashed lines) represent the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the treatment. <bold>(b)</bold> Relative change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the treatments. Points above 1 show an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the treated samples compared to the natural samples.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Salt- and carbonate-removed samples (SR $+$ CR)}?><title>Salt- and carbonate-removed samples (SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR)</title>
      <p id="d1e5496">DSC thermograms of the samples after combined salt and carbonate removal are
shown in Figs. 3 and A1 in Appendix A in a blue color. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was, on average, 249.2 K, i.e., 1.4 K higher than for the natural samples (Table 4). Thus, the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the
combined treatment is higher than the ones of each single treatment (Fig. 6a). Soil Sa exhibited the highest increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after combined salt and carbonate removal, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K for the 5 wt % sample and 3.5 K for 2 wt % (Fig. A1 in Appendix A), although its EC is negligible (0.9 dS m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and TC (21.1 %) is average (Table 2). Comparison with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after carbonate removal reveals that this treatment alone also led to a strong increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K for the 5 wt % and even 4.1 K for the 2 wt % sample. Thus, we identify a strong interference of carbonates with the IN-active species in this sample.</p>
      <p id="d1e5655"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased due to salt and carbonate removal for all samples (Fig. 6b). The highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed in Dust Jab (Fig. 4), with a value of 1.9 K for the 5 wt % sample. Simultaneously, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K for the 5 wt % sample and even by 2.8 K for the 2 wt % sample. Indeed, Dust Jab exhibits the highest EC (43.9 dS m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and TC values (43 %) of all samples and the second highest pH value (8.3). This again confirms that the presence of both carbonates and soluble salts reduce IN activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>3.1.4</label><title>Organic-matter-removed samples (OMR)</title>
      <p id="d1e5765">DSC thermograms taken after organic matter removal, given in a red color in
Figs. 3 and A1 in Appendix A, show that this treatment reduced the
freezing onset temperatures of most samples (blue-colored region of the
triangles in Figs. 4, 5, A2, and A3 in Appendix A). For the 5 wt % concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was negative
for all samples, with an average decrease of 1.5 K. For the 2 wt %
samples, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 1 K, with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K. Soil Sa, which exhibited the strongest shift to lower temperatures after organics removal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K),
had the highest organic matter content among all studied samples (5.28 %). This demonstrates that freezing occurring at the highest temperatures strongly depends on the presence of organic matter and confirms the positive correlation (correlation coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 5 wt % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2 wt % samples) between organic matter and the freezing onset temperatures that had been reported in Part 1 (Hamzehpour et al., 2022). The dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the presence of organic matter is also in agreement with various studies, which showed that the IN activity of collected soil dust samples decreases when the samples are treated with heat or hydrogen peroxide to remove organics from soil dust samples (Conen et al., 2011; Tobo et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e5926">Although the correlation coefficient between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OM was
significantly positive (0.77 for 5 wt % and 0.74 for 2 wt %
concentration, Hamzehpour et al., 2022), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> did not decrease after organics removal with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 5 wt % and 1.04 for 2 wt % samples. For both concentrations, almost half of the samples showed an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. 5 and 6b). In Soil and Dust Mer, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased due to OMR treatments (Fig. A1
in Appendix A) despite their rather high OM content (3.32 % and 2.89 %, respectively). Therefore, it seems that the total content of organic matter is not the determining factor for the heterogeneously frozen fraction of the natural samples. Moreover, organic molecules may also have a hampering effect on the IN activity of the minerals, e.g., through adsorption on the mineral surfaces and blocking of IN-active sites (Kleber et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e6012">The combined removal of soluble salts and organic matter shows similar
trends in IN activity as the removal of OMR alone, though these are less pronounced. For
the 5 wt % samples, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased, on average, by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K after combined SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR treatment compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K for the OMR treatment alone. For the 2 wt % samples, the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K for organic matter removal alone and was reduced to only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K for combined salt and organic matter removal. Moreover, the few samples that showed an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after OMR treatment alone also did so for the combined SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR treatment, with Dust Mer at 5 wt % concentration as the only exception. Likewise, the combined SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR treatment had a similar effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the organic matter removal alone, with a few exceptions, as can be seen in Figs. 6 and 8. Thus, the combination of salt and organic matter removal seems to be dominated by the effect of organics removal.</p>
      <p id="d1e6121">The correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with organic matter content and the decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> digestion are strong evidence that the minor fraction of organics present in the soil and dust samples dominates freezing onset temperatures. To gain further insight into the chemical composition of the organic matter present in the samples, we performed TGA-MS coupled with DSC. The thermograms show a stepwise decrease of mass (Fig. 7) that we can attribute to H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O or CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss, as registered by the concurrently measured mass spectra. Furthermore, we can attribute mass loss to exothermic and endothermic processes based on the sign of the heat flow registered by DSC (Table 5, Fig. A4 in Appendix A).</p>
      <p id="d1e6184">The weight loss up to about 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is attributable to loss of
sorbed water. Dehydration of gypsum occurs from 100 to 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
is accompanied by an endothermic heat flow. Water bonded to smectites is
also expected to be released in this temperature range (Jananee et al., 2021). Combustion of soil organic matter can be identified through CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> release together with an exothermic heat flow. It exhibits two main steps of weight loss in the range of 250–550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The first, between 250 and 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, is associated with more easily oxidizable compounds, including simple protein molecules, polysaccharides (e.g., cellulosic material), and aliphatic structures. The second, between 350 and
550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, is due to thermal degradation of recalcitrant, aromatic
structures including lignin and non-hydrolyzable compounds (Giannetta et
al., 2018). Weight loss above 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is associated with the
decomposition of carbonates and is characterized by an endothermic heat flow.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e6253"><bold>(a)</bold> TGA thermographs for soil and <bold>(b)</bold> for dust samples. Dashed lines delimit weight loss resulting from H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (up to 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), organic compounds (200–550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) separated into easily oxidizable (200–350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and recalcitrant (350–550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) substances, and carbonate compounds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d1e6335">Weight loss in percent, quantified with TGA-MS coupled with DSC
thermograms in terms of different volatile and oxidizable fractions.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40–200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">200–350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">350–550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">250–550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">550–750 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">750</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">EO-OC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">TS-OC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">TOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">IM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil Sa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil Jab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil Mer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil MD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust Sa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.96</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust Jab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">64.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust Mer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust MD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.94</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e6338">OC: organic carbon; EO-OC: easily oxidizable OC; TS-OC: thermally stable OC;
TOC: total organic carbon; IM: inorganic materials other than carbonates.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e6697">Overall, OC determined through TGA-MS is similar and correlates well (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with OM determined through wet oxidation, as displayed in Table 2. According to Table 5, the ratio of EO-OS and TS-OC varies between samples. Soil Sa and Soil Mer had the highest total organic carbon (TOC) content among samples; however, the easily oxidizable fraction was highest in Soil Sa (1.42 %), while the thermally more stable fraction was largest in Soil Mer (1.91 %). Overall, IN activity of the soil and dust samples
correlates better with the easily oxidizable organic fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.61 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the average of 2 wt % and 5 wt % samples) than with the thermally more stable organics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.28 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Therefore, carbohydrates such as cellulose and proteinaceous molecules are the more likely contributors to the IN activity
of the investigated dust and soil samples than the thermally more stable organics like lignin. Interestingly, the positive correlation between EO-OC increases after carbonate removal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.65 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pointing to an inhibiting effect of carbonates on the IN activity of these organics. Such an inhibiting effect seems to be especially strong for Soil Sa, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K for the 5 wt % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K for the 2 wt % concentration. This sample exhibits a strong decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after OMR treatment, which indicates that its onset freezing temperature is determined
by the organic fraction. Thus, as the IN activity of the organic material is
reduced in the presence of carbonates, there seem to be interactions between
these species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS5">
  <label>3.1.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Salt-, carbonate-, and organic-matter-removed samples (SR $+$ CR $+$ OMR)}?><title>Salt-, carbonate-, and organic-matter-removed samples (SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR)</title>
      <p id="d1e6990">DSC thermograms of the samples after SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR treatments are shown
in Figs. 3 and A1 in Appendix A in a purple color. In Figs. 4, 5, A2, and A3 in Appendix A, the centers of the triangles represent this treatment. With a value of 248.1 K, the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is only
0.35 K higher (Table 4) than the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(247.8 K) but lower than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after SR, CR, and SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR treatments. Yet, for the individual samples, the trends are diverse: for three samples (Soil Sa, Soil Mer, and Soil MD), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is negative at both concentrations (2 wt % and 5 wt %); for Dust MD, it is negative for 2 wt % and slightly positive for 5 wt % suspensions; for the other samples, it is positive at both concentrations. The highest decrease compared to the natural sample was in Soil Sa (5 wt %), with a 2.4 K reduction (Figs. 4 and A1 in Appendix A). The highest increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was for the 2 wt % sample of Dust Jab, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K.</p>
      <p id="d1e7162">In most samples, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased after combined SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR
treatments. Yet, for some samples with a negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was accompanied by a slight decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. 3, 6 and A1 in Appendix A). The strongest increase was for the 2 wt % sample of Soil Jab, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and for the 5 wt % sample of Dust Jab, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.61</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This strong increase is in accordance with their high EC and TC values together with their rather low organic matter content. These samples exhibit
both rather high microcline and quartz contents, such that the positive
effects of removing salt and carbonates could have compensated the negative
effect of organics removal, resulting in a net increase in heterogeneously
frozen fractions.</p>
      <p id="d1e7331">Overall, the negative correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and microcline in natural
samples (cc of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2 wt % and 5 wt % samples,
respectively) reverted to a slightly positive one after SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR
treatment (cc of 0.30 and 0.32 for 5 wt % and 2 wt % samples,
respectively). For quartz, the negative correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also reverted to a positive one for the 5 wt % samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but remained negative for the 2 wt % samples. Moreover, the significantly positive correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the total clay mineral content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) reversed to negative (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the 5 wt % samples and remained only slightly positive for the 2 wt % samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but with a much lower value than for the natural samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Interestingly, for OMR treatment alone, the correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and clay minerals was almost as high as for the natural sample (cc of 0.62 and 0.71 for 5 wt % and 2 wt %, respectively), indicating that only the
combined SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR treatment destroys the positive correlation. This
again shows how intricate the interactions between the different soil and
dust components are and that the observed IN activity is the product of all
these interactions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Effect of salt, salt concentration, and pH on IN activity of microcline and quartz</title>
      <p id="d1e7499">To substantiate further the impeding effect of soluble salts and carbonates
on the IN activity of microcline and quartz in the natural samples, we
performed freezing experiments with 2 wt % suspensions of microcline and
1 wt % suspensions of quartz reference samples in salt solutions of NaCl, CaCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and MgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to mimic the saline environment in LUP. Moreover, we also varied pH and analyzed the thermograms with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the melting point depression, as summarized in Figs. 8 and 9.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e7544"><bold>(a)</bold> Heterogeneous freezing temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of microcline (2 wt %) and quartz (1 wt %) in aqueous solutions of the salts NaCl (triangles), CaCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(squares), and MgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (circles) at the salt concentrations 0.01, 0.1,
and 0.4 M, and for pH 5 (green), pH 7 (blue), and pH 8 (red). Yellow
diamonds represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for pure microcline (2 wt %) and quartz (1 wt %) in Milli-Q water. The blue dashed line in panel <bold>(a)</bold> represents the freezing temperature according to the water activity criterion; in panel <bold>(b)</bold>, it marks the frozen fractions of the minerals in pure water.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e7629">Melting points of microcline and quartz suspensions in aqueous
solutions of the salts: NaCl (triangles), CaCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (squares), and MgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(circles) at three salt concentrations (0.01, 0.1, and 0.4 M) and for three
pH values: pH 5 (green), pH 7 (blue), pH 8 (red). Reference measurements
with microcline and quartz suspensions (yellow diamonds) in Milli-Q water
yield the melting temperature of pure water (dashed line).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e7657">Salt concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, and 0.4 M were selected, as they comprise the salinity range of the soil and dust samples. The lowest concentration is representative for samples with EC lower than 1 dS m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Soil Sa and samples after salt removal), 0.1 M for samples with EC values of around 10 dS m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 0.4 M for samples with the highest salinity of around 40 dS m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Soil and Dust Jab); pH values were chosen to be 5 to represent the acidic conditions in soils in the absence of carbonates (samples after carbonate removal), pH 7 as the typical value for slightly carbonaceous conditions, and pH 8 to represent the basic environment in calcareous soils with a high content of carbonates (i.e., all samples before carbonate removal).</p>
      <p id="d1e7696">Results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the microcline and quartz samples, depending on the solution composition, are presented in Fig. 8 together with the reference value for microcline and quartz in pure water. Based on these experiments, the IN activity of both quartz and microcline decreases with increasing concentrations of all three alkali halides. With increasing salt concentration, a decrease in freezing onset temperatures as a function of water activity, as described by the “water-activity criterion” (Koop et al., 2000; Zobrist et al., 2008), is expected and can be derived from the melting point depression as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">melt</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Figure 9 shows that the melting points of the salt solutions decrease to slightly below 271 K for the highest investigated salt concentration of 0.4 M. Table 6 compares the measured melting point depression <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">melt</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (DSC) with the ones based on water activities calculated with AIOMFAC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">melt</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zuend et al., 2008, 2011). From these data, the freezing point depression <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that is expected in the absence of specific interactions between the IN-active surface and the solute (Klumpp et al., 2022), which are given in Fig. 8 as blue dashed lines, can be derived. Comparison of the calculated freezing point depression with the actual reduction in onset freezing temperature shown in Fig. 8 shows a larger freezing point depression than predicted based on the water-activity criterion for microcline and quartz. A decrease of freezing temperatures in microcline
samples with increasing salt concentrations that exceeds the prediction
based on the water-activity criterion is in agreement with findings from ice
nucleation studies with K-feldspars in the presence of monovalent cations
(Kumar et al., 2018; Whale et al., 2018; Yun et al., 2020). Figure 8 shows
now that divalent cations have a similar effect as monovalent ions. These
findings are supported by Whale (2022), who recently showed that
MgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has a similar effect as monovalent
cations on ice nucleation by feldspar. For the investigated concentration and pH range, the cation
concentration is more influential for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of microcline than the nature of the cation. At pH 8, the freezing onset temperatures are only slightly reduced compared with neutral conditions. Yet, this decrease may amplify with increasing pH. For quartz, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is less influenced by the solution concentration than in the case of microcline, but it is more sensitive to the nature of the solute, with MgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inducing a stronger shift to colder temperatures than NaCl and CaCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover, for the investigated pH range, the dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on pH is stronger for quartz than for microcline. The decrease in IN activity of quartz with increasing pH is in accordance with findings of Kumar et al. (2019a) and is explicable by the increasing quartz dissolution with increasing pH, which destroys nucleation sites.</p>
      <p id="d1e7884">Figure 8b shows that increasing the solute concentration also affects
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of microcline. Here, the valence of the cation seems to play a role, as the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is stronger in the presence of the divalent Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions than for Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the case of
Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, concentrations up to 0.1 M even lead to an increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is in accordance with the enhanced IN activity observed by Perkins et al. (2020) in dilute NaCl solutions. Similar trends are also present for quartz, though they are less pronounced.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Table 6</label><caption><p id="d1e7966">Water activities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the salt solutions calculated with
AIOMFAC (Zuend et al., 2008, 2010); melting temperatures, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">melt</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the parameterization by Koop et al. (2000) in comparison with the measured melting temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">melt</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (DSC) (average of quartz and microcline samples at all pH values), and corresponding freezing point depression as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">melt</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zobrist et al., 2008).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">NaCl </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">CaCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">MgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01 M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1 M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.4 M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01 M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1 M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.4 M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01 M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.1 M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.4 M</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.9997</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9966</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.9869</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.9995</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.9954</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.9808</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.9995</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.9954</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.9808</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">melt</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">273.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">272.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">271.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">273.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">272.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">271.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">273.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">272.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">271.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">melt</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (DSC) (K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">273.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">272.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">271.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">272.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">272.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">270.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">273.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">272.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">270.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e8398">Freezing onset temperatures of the samples after the removal of salts,
carbonates, and organic matter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are on average 248.6 K for the 5 wt % samples and 247.7 K for the 2 wt % samples compared with (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 246.7 K for both the 5 wt % and 2 wt % samples after organics removal alone. The reference freezing measurements with quartz and microcline show that, based on the pH and salt content of the LUP samples, the higher freezing temperatures of SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR-treated samples compared with OMR-treated samples is in accordance with the recovered IN activity of quartz and microcline after soluble-salt and carbonate removal. Comparison with the effect of SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR removal shows that the recovery in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mainly due to carbonate removal and indicates a high sensitivity of IN-active sites towards pH. The generally higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR samples (0.72 as the average of 5 wt % and 2 wt % samples) compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of OMR samples (0.65) is in a range that can also be ascribed to the recovered IN activity of microcline and quartz after removal of soluble salts and carbonates. These findings, together with the slightly positive correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with quartz and microcline content of the samples after SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR treatments, can be considered as sufficient
evidence that these minerals influence the heterogeneously frozen fraction
and might even dominate freezing onset temperatures in the SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR-treated samples. Yet, the data are less conclusive regarding the respective
contributions of either quartz or microcline to the IN activity of the LUP
samples. Identifying quartz as a contributor to the IN activity of the SR
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR-treated samples would be among the first evidence that
atmospheric quartz surfaces are sufficiently defectuous to act as a relevant
atmospheric ice nucleator. The higher quartz (14.3 %–32 %) than microcline
(3.5 %–6.9 %) content would speak for quartz as the dominating INP.
Specifically, the quartz concentration in the suspensions varies from
0.3 wt %–0.6 wt % in the 2 wt % samples to 0.7 wt %–1.6 wt % in the 5 wt % samples. The reference quartz sample (SA) at a suspension concentration of 1 wt % shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and even 0.79 for the freshly milled sample (Kumar et al., 2019a). In comparison, the microcline concentration in
the suspensions varies from 0.07 wt % to 0.14 wt % for the 2 wt % samples and from 0.18 wt % to 0.35 wt % for the 5 wt % samples, while Kumar et al. (2018) found <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a 0.2 wt % microcline suspension. The freezing onset temperatures of SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR-treated samples are about 3–4 K lower than typical values of microcline emulsions in pure water (251–252 K; Kaufmann et al., 2016; Kumar et al., 2018; Klumpp et al., 2022) but are in the range observed for emulsion freezing experiments with quartz (247–250 K; Kumar et al., 2019a). Thus, the higher quartz concentration and the better agreement of the freezing onset temperatures of the LUP samples with the one of quartz than microcline would speak for quartz as the more relevant INP in the LUP samples. Yet, the evidence is not sufficient to exclude the opposite.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>General discussion and conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e8621">The investigated soil and dust samples proved to be complex mixtures of IN-promoting and -inhibiting agents. Through selective removal of some components and correlations between IN activity and mineralogical composition and physicochemical properties, we have been able to identify the following main actors:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e8626">The relatively small share of organic matter (1 %–5.3 %) provides the INPs that freeze at the highest temperatures in most samples with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">248.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K as the average of 5 wt % and 2 wt % concentrations. We inferred this finding from the reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after organic matter removal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K) and from the positive correlation between organic matter content and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Conversely, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is, on average, the same before and after OMR treatments, which indicates that organic INPs are substituted by mineral INPs present in the samples, which nucleate ice with a similar efficiency but at lower temperatures.</p>
      <p id="d1e8720">The (bio-)organic INPs seem to be carbohydrates, such as cellulose and/or proteinaceous molecules, rather than aromatic compounds, such as lignins, as evidenced by the better correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the natural samples with the easily oxidizable fraction (250–350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) than with the thermally more stable fraction (350–550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) in TGA-MS. This finding is in accordance with studies by Hill et al. (2016) and Paramonov et al. (2018). Moreover, the organic matter seems to be associated with the clay mineral fraction, as evidenced by the strong correlation between total clay mineral content and OM content from wet oxidation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.953</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Indeed, (bio-)organic molecules are known to adsorb on clay mineral edges and basal surfaces (Kleber et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e8764">In most samples, the presence of soluble salts and carbonates seems to hamper the IN activity of the (bio-)organic INPs. This can be seen best for Soil Sa, in which (bio-)organic INPs dominate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as evidenced by the strong reduction in the onset freezing temperature after organic matter removal. The freezing onset of this sample shifts to clearly higher temperatures after salt and carbonate removal, showing that these components hampered the IN activity of the organic INPs, either through direct interaction with the solid mineral or via dissolved ions or a combination of both. Some samples show an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after organic matter removal, pointing again to a direct interaction between organic matter and minerals, this time in form of an inhibiting effect of organic matter on the IN activity of the minerals. Overall, the IN activity of the organics seems to be influenced by inorganic species and vice versa. Further work is required to investigate to what extent such interactions enhance or inhibit the IN activity of organics and minerals.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e8790">Clay mineral content of the investigated samples ranges from 14 % to 38 % and consists of kaolinite (2.2 %–8.4 %), smectites (0 %–10.6 %), polygorskite (3.8 %–12.6 %), and chlorite (3.9 %–16.8 %). This mineral class has proven to be IN active, with onset freezing temperatures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 239–242 K for kaolinite and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 239–247 K for montmorillonite in emulsion freezing experiments (Pinti et al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2019b). The other clay minerals present in the LUP samples have not yet been tested in IN experiments, but due to their structural similarity with kaolinite and montmorillonite, they most likely also contribute to IN activity. The significant correlation of total clay mineral content with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the average of 5 wt % and 2 wt % samples) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests a large contribution of this mineral class to the IN activity of the LUP samples, though this may also just be a co-correlation paralleling the high correlation between organic matter and IN activity.</p>
      <p id="d1e8863">After organic matter removal, the correlation of total clay minerals with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased only slightly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited a clear downward shift from a mean value of 247.8 to 246.7 K. Although the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained almost the same, its correlation with the clay mineral content decreased drastically but remained positive (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). As the correlation of IN activity with all other minerals is even lower, clay minerals indeed seem to be the most dominant INP class after organic matter removal. This is supported by the heterogeneous freezing range (236–248 K) of the LUP samples after OMR removal, which is in general agreement with the freezing temperatures of clay minerals, although it is not specific for them, as other mineral types are IN active within the same temperature range.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e8924">The K-feldspar (microcline) content of the investigated samples ranges from 3.5 %–6.9 %. Microcline has been shown to be a highly efficient INP, with freezing onset temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 251–252 K in emulsion freezing experiments (Kumar et al., 2018; Klumpp et al., 2022). Yet, it seems to be irrelevant as an INP in the natural LUP samples, since their microcline content is clearly negatively correlated, with both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the average of 5 wt % and 2 wt % samples) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of most natural samples is too low for microcline suspended in pure water and further decreases after organic matter removal. The irrelevance of K-feldspar as an INP in the investigated samples is opposite to findings from previous freezing experiments with desert dust samples, which concluded that K-feldspars are relevant contributors to the observed IN activity of those samples (O'Sullivan et al., 2014; Boose et al., 2016, 2019; Paramonov et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e8999">Only after removal of soluble salts, carbonates, and organic matter, a positive correlation of microcline with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the average of 5 wt % and 2 wt % samples) emerged, while the correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained negative (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Moreover, the onset freezing temperatures of the thus-treated samples (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">248.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K) remained below the typical freezing onset temperatures of microcline.</p>
      <p id="d1e9065">Reference emulsion freezing experiments with a microcline suspension in salt solutions covering the concentration and pH range of the LUP samples revealed that both the high salt concentration and pH of the natural samples hampers the IN activity of microcline. The increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the OMR- and the SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR-treated samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K as the average of the 5 wt % and 2 wt % samples) suggests that mineral components within the samples can recover their IN activity after salt and carbonate removal. If this mineral component were microcline, the recovery would not be complete, as the onset freezing temperature remained below the values from emulsion freezing experiments with microcline reference samples in pure water.</p>
      <p id="d1e9135">In addition to the sensitivity of microcline towards soluble salts and pH, its minor concentration in the LUP samples relative to the larger contributions of other IN-active species might have obscured its contribution to IN activity. In other studies, the K-feldspar concentration and its contribution to the total of IN-active species showed more variation between samples. In Paramonov et al. (2018), the K-feldspar fraction varied from 1.9 % to 9.3 %; in O'Sullivan et al. (2014), it varied from 2.1 %–11 %. The microcline concentration in the samples investigated by Boose et al. (2016) ranged between 0 wt % and 3.9 wt %, with the exception of one sample with a microcline content of 30 wt %, which might have been decisive for the positive correlation between IN activity and microcline content.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e9139">Another IN-active mineral present in the LUP samples is quartz, with concentrations ranging from 14 % to 32 %. As the IN activity of quartz has been shown to depend on defects that can be introduced through milling (Zolles et al., 2015; Kumar et al., 2019a), it is unclear to what extent natural quartz samples are IN active. To avoid a high bias in IN activity through milling, we just sieved the soil samples to isolate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particle fraction. In emulsion freezing experiments, freezing onset temperatures of quartz ranged from 247 to 250 K (Kumar et al., 2019a), which coincides with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range of the untreated LUP samples. Yet, the correlations of quartz content with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the average of the 5 wt % and 2 wt % samples) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are both negative. This is opposite to findings by Boose et al. (2016, 2019), who found a positive correlation between quartz content and the IN activity of desert dust samples; yet, some of their samples had been milled prior to performing freezing experiments.</p>
      <p id="d1e9222">After removal of soluble salts, carbonates, and organic matter, the correlation of quartz content with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> turned positive for the 5 wt % samples but remained negative for the 2 wt % samples, with correlations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Reference emulsion freezing experiments with a quartz suspension with salt concentration and pH in the range of the LUP samples showed that, similar to microcline, the IN activity of quartz is also reduced in this environment. Thus, the recovery of quartz INPs provides a second explanation for the higher average IN activity of SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR-treated samples compared with OMR-treated samples. The higher quartz than microcline content in the LUP samples together with the better agreement of freezing onset temperatures of reference quartz samples with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggest that quartz contributes more to the IN activity of the LUP samples than microcline; yet, the opposite assumption that microcline is the INP responsible for the increase in IN activity after SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR removal from the OMR sample cannot be excluded. Thus, the LUP dataset is not able to answer the question of whether natural quartz is a relevant contributor to IN activity in the atmosphere.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e9366">Soluble salts may be present as crystalline phases and/or amorphous brine. As they are soluble, we can exclude them as INPs, but they may interfere with the IN activity of other INPs. Seven out of the eight LUP samples contain halite (crystallized NaCl) at concentrations from 1.3 % to 5.7 %, which completely dissolves in 5 wt % and 2 wt % aqueous suspensions. The low correlation between halite content and electrical conductivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicates the presence of amorphous salts – likely chlorides, sulfates, carbonates, and bicarbonates of K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, as these are the most abundant ions in LUP sediments (Hamzehpour et al., 2022; Sharifi et al., 2018). Dissolved salts are known to decrease freezing temperatures as a function of water activity according to the water-activity criterion (Koop et al., 2000; Zobrist et al., 2008). Yet, reference freezing experiments with quartz and microcline evidenced a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that exceeds the expected effect of water activity for both minerals. The negative correlation of electrical conductivity with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the average of 5 wt % and 2 wt % samples) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> further supports the hampering effect that the high salinity has on the IN activity of the LUP samples. As the impact of soluble salts on IN activity depends on the suspension concentration, a higher dilution should reduce it. This can be seen for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the untreated Dust Jab, which is the sample with the highest electrical conductivity (43.9 dS m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>): while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the 2 wt % sample is 0.62, the one of the 5 wt % sample is only 0.49. At an even lower concentration, the effect of soluble salts should decrease even more and might become negligible for immersion freezing in cloud droplets.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e9521">Based on the XRD analysis, total carbonate concentrations vary between 13.1 % and 28.5 % in the LUP samples, with contributions of calcite (9.7 %–13.5 %), dolomite (1.9 %–4.5 %), aragonite (0 %–13.4 %), and magnesite (0 %–4.9 %). As calcite and dolomite did not show any IN activity in emulsion freezing experiments (Kaufmann et al., 2016), we consider the IN activity of all carbonate minerals to be negligible. The irrelevance of carbonates as INPs is further supported by the negative correlation of total carbonates with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the average of 5 wt % and 2 wt % samples) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Rather, this negative correlation together with the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %K) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RT</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CR</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) after carbonate removal suggest that carbonates inhibit the INPs present in the samples. This hampering effect could occur by occlusion of active sites through direct interaction with the minerals or through release of the ions Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the solution. Release of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is responsible for the basic pH of the suspensions, which may influence the IN activity of INPs through deprotonation of IN-active sites or by increasing the solubility of minerals – e.g., as is the case for quartz (Kumar et al., 2019b). Reference measurements showed that the IN activity of quartz and microcline is indeed already reduced at pH 8 compared to neutral conditions. Yet, the anticorrelation of IN activity with pH is less pronounced than the one with total carbonates – that is, the correlation of pH with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the natural samples is only slightly negative (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the average of 5 wt % and 2 wt % samples) but slightly positive with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>cc</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As the freezing onset of the natural samples is dominated by INPs originating from organic matter, the positive correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with pH compared to the negative one with carbonates makes it unlikely that the inhibition of (bio-)organic INPs originates from a pH effect. Rather, it might be due to direct interactions with the minerals, either through occlusion of (bio-)organic INPs from the solution through a cementing effect, by their adsorption on the mineral surface, or through interactions with dissolved Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can form inner-sphere and/or outer-sphere complexes with organic matter (Rowley et al., 2018). Further studies are required to elucidate which interactions are most relevant for the reduced IN activity.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e9775">In summary, the analysis of the effects that the different treatments exert
on the IN activity of the LUP samples revealed complex interactions between
organic matter and mineral particles in soils. This study was able to
elucidate some of these interactions; yet, more research is required to
disentangle how the mixing state of organic and inorganic soil components
influence their ability to nucleate ice. While research over the past years
established feldspars, quartz, and clay minerals as the most relevant
mineral INPs in dust, less is known about the composition of the
(bio-)organic matter that enhances the IN activity of fertile soils above
the one of mineral dust. More research is required to elucidate the
interactions between organic matter and mineral particles to improve our
understanding of the origin of high IN activity in fertile soils.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title> </title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e9793">DSC thermograms of treated soil samples with 5 wt % <bold>(a, c, e, g)</bold> and 2 wt % <bold>(b, d, f, h)</bold> concentrations in comparison with the untreated samples. SR: salt removed; CR: carbonate removed; OMR: organic matter removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR: salt and carbonate removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR: salt and organic matter removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR: salt, carbonate, and organics removed. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Kelvin and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in fraction are displayed directly on the curves.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d1e9864">Effects of treatments in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">treatment</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for dust and soil samples at 2 wt % concentration. SR: salt removed; CR: carbonate removed; OMR: organic matter removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR: salt and carbonate removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR: salt and organic matter removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR: salt-, carbonate-, and organic-removed treatments.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A3</label><caption><p id="d1e9929">Effects of treatments in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>rF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">het</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">treatment</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">natural</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for dust and soil samples at 2 wt % concentration. SR: salt removed; CR: carbonate removed; OMR: organic matter removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR: salt and carbonate removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR: salt and organic matter removed; SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OMR: salt-, carbonate-, and organic-removed treatments.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A4</label><caption><p id="d1e9992">TG (green) and DSC (blue) curves of soil and dust samples with
corresponding mass data plotted against temperature. Light blue: total ion
current of mass 44 (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14931/2022/acp-22-14931-2022-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e10017">The data presented in this publication are available at the ETHZ data repository (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000564710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3929/ethz-b-000564710</ext-link>; Hamzehpour, 2022).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e10026">NH conducted the experiments and field works. KK provided equipment and
facilities for the laboratory experiments. NH, CM, and TP contributed to the planning
and interpretation of the experiments. NH and CM prepared the manuscript,
with contributions from TP and KK. DT conducted the TGA analysis.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e10032">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e10038">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e10044">We thank Michael Plötze for the XRD measurements; we thank Ulrich Krieger and Uwe Weers for their support in the laboratory.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e10049">Nikou Hamzehpour has been supported by visiting professors grant at ETH. Kristian Klumpp has been supported by the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF; grant no. 200021_175716).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e10055">This paper was edited by Xavier Querol and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Abuduwaili, J., Liu, D., and Wu, G.: Saline dust storms and their ecological
impacts in arid regions, J. Arid Land, 2, 144–50,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1227.2010.00144" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3724/SP.J.1227.2010.00144</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ahmady-Birgani, H., Ravan, P., Schlosser, J. S., Cuevas-Robles, A.,
AzadiAghdam, M., and Sorooshian, A.: On the chemical nature of wet
deposition over a major desiccated lake: Case study for Lake Urmia basin,
Atmos. Res., 234, 104762, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104762" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104762</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K.
J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S., O'Sullivan, D., and Malkin, T. L.: The
importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase
clouds, Nature, 498, 355–358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12278</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bigg, E.: Ice Nucleus Concentrations in Remote Areas, J. Atmos. Sci., 30,
1153–1157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1973)030&lt;1153:INCIRA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1973)030&lt;1153:INCIRA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bish, D. L. and Plötze, M.: X-ray Powder Diffraction with Emphasis on
Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis in Industrial Mineralogy, in: Advances
in the characterization of industrial minerals, edited by: Christidis, G. E., EMU and Mineralogical Society, London, 9, 35–76, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bogler, S. and Borduas-Dedekind, N.: Lignin's ability to nucleate ice via immersion freezing and its stability towards physicochemical treatments and atmospheric processing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14509–14522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14509-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-14509-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boose, Y., Welti, A., Atkinson, J., Ramelli, F., Danielczok, A., Bingemer, H. G., Plötze, M., Sierau, B., Kanji, Z. A., and Lohmann, U.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on dust particles sourced from nine deserts worldwide – Part 1: Immersion freezing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15075–15095, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15075-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-15075-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boose, Y., Baloh, P., Plötze, M., Ofner, J., Grothe, H., Sierau, B., Lohmann, U., and Kanji, Z. A.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on dust particles sourced from nine deserts worldwide – Part 2: Deposition nucleation and condensation freezing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1059–1076, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1059-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-1059-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borduas-Dedekind, N., Ossola, R., David, R. O., Boynton, L. S., Weichlinger, V., Kanji, Z. A., and McNeill, K.: Photomineralization mechanism changes the ability of dissolved organic matter to activate cloud droplets and to nucleate ice crystals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12397–12412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12397-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-12397-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boroughani, M., Hashemi, H., Hosseini, S. H., Pourhashemi, S., and
Berndtsson, R.: Desiccating Lake Urmia: A new dust source of regional
importance, IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 17, 1483–1487,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2019.2949132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/LGRS.2019.2949132</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brunner, C., Brem, B. T., Collaud Coen, M., Conen, F., Hervo, M., Henne, S., Steinbacher, M., Gysel-Beer, M., and Kanji, Z. A.: The contribution of Saharan dust to the ice-nucleating particle concentrations at the High Altitude Station Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.), Switzerland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18029–18053, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18029-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-18029-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Wu, Z., Chen, J., Reicher, N., Fang, X., Rudich, Y., and Hu, M.: Size-resolved atmospheric ice-nucleating particles during East Asian dust events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3491–3506, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3491-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-3491-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Conen, F., Morris, C. E., Leifeld, J., Yakutin, M. V., and Alewell, C.: Biological residues define the ice nucleation properties of soil dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9643–9648, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9643-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9643-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Daily, M. I., Tarn, M. D., Whale, T. F., and Murray, B. J.: An evaluation of the heat test for the ice-nucleating ability of minerals and biological material, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2635–2665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2635-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-15-2635-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dane, J. H. and Topp, C. G. (Eds.): Methods of soil analysis, Part 4: Physical methods, Vol. 20, John Wiley and Sons, ISBN: 089118841X, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.:
Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on
climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0910818107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., McMeeking, G. R., Sullivan, R. C., Petters, M. D., Tobo, Y., Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Snider, J. R., Wang, Z., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Integrating laboratory and field data to quantify the immersion freezing ice nucleation activity of mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 393–409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-393-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-393-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Després, V. R., Huffman, J. A., Burrows, S. M., Hoose, C., Safatov, A.,
Buryak, G., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Elbert, W., Andreae, M. O.,
Pöschl, U., and Jaenicke, R.: Primary biological aerosol particles in
the atmosphere: a review, Tellus B, 64, 15598,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Farokhnia, A. and Morid, S.: Assessment of the effects of temperature and
precipitation variations on the trend of river flows in Urmia Lake
watershed, Journal of Water and Wastewater, 25, 86–97, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Field, P. R. and Heymsfield, A. J.: Importance of snow to global
precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 9512–9520, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065497" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL065497</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fornea, A. P., Brooks, S. D., Dooley, J. B., and Saha, A.: Heterogeneous
freezing of ice on atmospheric aerosols containing ash, soot, and soil, J.
Geophys. Res., 114, D13201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011958" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd011958</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Giannetta, B., Plaza, C., Vischetti, C., Cotrufo, M. F., and Zaccone, C.:
Distribution and thermal stability of physically and chemically protected
organic matter fractions in soils across different ecosystems, Biol. Fert.
Soils, 54, 671–681, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-018-1290-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00374-018-1290-9</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goodman, M. M., Carling, G. T., Fernandez, D. P., Rey, K. A., Hale, C. A.,
Bickmore, B. R., Nelson, S. T., and Munroe, J. S.: Trace element chemistry
of atmospheric deposition along the Wasatch Front (Utah, USA) reflects
regional playa dust and local urban aerosols, Chem. Geol., 530, 119317,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.119317" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.119317</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gorji, T., Yildirim, A., Hamzehpour, N., Tanik, A., and Sertel, E.: Soil
salinity analysis of Urmia Lake Basin using Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2A
based spectral indices and electrical conductivity measurements, Ecol.
Indic., 112, 106173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106173" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106173</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hamzehpour, N.: The Urmia Playa as source of airborne dust and ice nucleating particles – Part 2: Unraveling the relationship between soil dust composition and ice-nucleation activity, ETH Zurich [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000564710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3929/ethz-b-000564710</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hamzehpour, N., Eghbal, M. K., Abasiyan, S. M. A., and Dill, H. G.:
Pedogenic evidence of Urmia Lake's maximum expansion in the late Quaternary,
CATENA, 171, 398–415, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.019</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hamzehpour, N., Marcolli, C., Pashai, S., Klumpp, K., and Peter, T.: Measurement report: The Urmia playa as a source of
airborne dust and ice-nucleating particles – Part 1:
Correlation between soils and airborne samples, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14905–14930, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14905-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-14905-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harrison, A. D., Whale, T. F., Carpenter, M. A., Holden, M. A., Neve, L., O'Sullivan, D., Vergara Temprado, J., and Murray, B. J.: Not all feldspars are equal: a survey of ice nucleating properties across the feldspar group of minerals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10927–10940, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10927-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10927-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harrison, A. D., Lever, K., Sanchez-Marroquin, A., Holden, M. A., Whale, T. F., Tarn, M. D., McQuaid, J. B., and Murray, B. J.: The ice-nucleating ability of quartz immersed in water and its atmospheric importance compared to K-feldspar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11343–11361, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11343-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-11343-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hill, T. C. J., DeMott, P. J., Tobo, Y., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Moffett, B. F., Franc, G. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Sources of organic ice nucleating particles in soils, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7195–7211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hiranuma, N., Möhler, O., Yamashita, K., Tajiri, T., Saito, A., Kiselev,
A., Hoffmann, N., Hoose, C., Jantsch, E., Koop, T., and Murakami, M.: Ice
nucleation by cellulose and its potential contribution to ice formation in
clouds, Nat. Geosci., 8, 273–277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2374" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2374</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hiranuma, N., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Bingemer, H., Budke, C., Curtius, J., Danielczok, A., Diehl, K., Dreischmeier, K., Ebert, M., Frank, F., Hoffmann, N., Kandler, K., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Leisner, T., Möhler, O., Nillius, B., Peckhaus, A., Rose, D., Weinbruch, S., Wex, H., Boose, Y., DeMott, P. J., Hader, J. D., Hill, T. C. J., Kanji, Z. A., Kulkarni, G., Levin, E. J. T., McCluskey, C. S., Murakami, M., Murray, B. J., Niedermeier, D., Petters, M. D., O'Sullivan, D., Saito, A., Schill, G. P., Tajiri, T., Tolbert, M. A., Welti, A., Whale, T. F., Wright, T. P., and Yamashita, K.: A comprehensive laboratory study on the immersion freezing behavior of illite NX particles: a comparison of 17 ice nucleation measurement techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2489–2518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015</ext-link>,
2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hiranuma, N., Adachi, K., Bell, D. M., Belosi, F., Beydoun, H., Bhaduri, B., Bingemer, H., Budke, C., Clemen, H.-C., Conen, F., Cory, K. M., Curtius, J., DeMott, P. J., Eppers, O., Grawe, S., Hartmann, S., Hoffmann, N., Höhler, K., Jantsch, E., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Kulkarni, G., Mayer, A., Murakami, M., Murray, B. J., Nicosia, A., Petters, M. D., Piazza, M., Polen, M., Reicher, N., Rudich, Y., Saito, A., Santachiara, G., Schiebel, T., Schill, G. P., Schneider, J., Segev, L., Stopelli, E., Sullivan, R. C., Suski, K., Szakáll, M., Tajiri, T., Taylor, H., Tobo, Y., Ullrich, R., Weber, D., Wex, H., Whale, T. F., Whiteside, C. L., Yamashita, K., Zelenyuk, A., and Möhler, O.: A comprehensive characterization of ice nucleation by three different types of cellulose particles immersed in water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4823–4849, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4823-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-4823-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, S., Hu, W., Chen, J., Wu, Z. J., Zhang, D. Z., and Fu, P. Q.:
Overview of biological ice nucleating particles in the atmosphere, Environ.
Int., 146, 106197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106197" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2020.106197</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2391 pp., 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jackson, M. L.: Soil chemical analysis-advanced course, University of
Wisconsin, College of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science, Madison, WI,
991 pp., 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jananee, B., Thangam, V., and Rajalakshmi, A.: Investigation of soils by
thermal and spectroscopic analysis, Chem. Eng. Commun., 208, 812–821,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2019.1680370" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00986445.2019.1680370</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiang, L., Jiapaer, G., Bao, A., Li, Y., Guo, H., Zheng, G., Chen, T., and De
Maeyer, P.: Assessing land degradation and quantifying its drivers in the
Amudarya River delta, Ecol. Indic., 107, 105595,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105595</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo,
D. J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of ice nucleating particles, Meteor. Mon., 58, 1.1–1.33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0006.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0006.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaufmann, L., Marcolli, C., Hofer, J., Pinti, V., Hoyle, C. R., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation efficiency of natural dust samples in the immersion mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11177–11206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11177-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-11177-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kittrick, J. A. and Hope, E. W.: A procedure for the particle-size
separation of soils for X-ray diffraction analysis, Soil Sci., 96, 319–325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196311000-00006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1097/00010694-196311000-00006</ext-link>, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kleber, M., Bourg, I. C., Coward, E. K., Hansel, C. M., Myeneni, S. C. B.,
and Nunan, N.: Dynamic interactions at the mineral–organic matter
interface, Nature Reviews Earth &amp; Environment, 2, 402–421,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Klumpp, K., Marcolli, C., and Peter, T.: The Impact of (bio-)organic substances on the ice nucleation activity of the K-feldspar microcline in aqueous solutions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3655–3673, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3655-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-3655-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A. and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–614, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/35020537</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kumar, A., Marcolli, C., Luo, B., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation activity of silicates and aluminosilicates in pure water and aqueous solutions – Part 1: The K-feldspar microcline, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7057–7079, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7057-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7057-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kumar, A., Marcolli, C., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation activity of silicates and aluminosilicates in pure water and aqueous solutions – Part 2: Quartz and amorphous silica, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6035–6058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6035-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6035-2019</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kumar, A., Marcolli, C., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation activity of silicates and aluminosilicates in pure water and aqueous solutions – Part 3: Aluminosilicates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6059–6084, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6059-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6059-2019</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lacher, L., Steinbacher, M., Bukowiecki, N., Herrmann, E., Zipori, A., and
Kanji, Z. A.: Impact of air mass conditions and aerosol properties on ice
nucleating particle concentrations at the high altitude research station
Jungfraujoch, Atmosphere, 9, 363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9090363" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos9090363</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lacher, L., Clemen, H.-C., Shen, X., Mertes, S., Gysel-Beer, M., Moallemi, A., Steinbacher, M., Henne, S., Saathoff, H., Möhler, O., Höhler, K., Schiebel, T., Weber, D., Schrod, J., Schneider, J., and Kanji, Z. A.: Sources and nature of ice-nucleating particles in the free troposphere at Jungfraujoch in winter 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16925–16953, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16925-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-16925-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U.: Aerosol effects on clouds and climate, Space Sci. Rev., 125,
129–137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9051-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-006-9051-8</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U. and Neubauer, D.: The importance of mixed-phase and ice clouds for climate sensitivity in the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8807–8828, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8807-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-8807-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marcolli, C., Gedamke, S., Peter, T., and Zobrist, B.: Efficiency of immersion mode ice nucleation on surrogates of mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5081–5091, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5081-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5081-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Morris, C. E., Sands, D. C., Glaux, C., Samsatly, J., Asaad, S., Moukahel, A. R., Gonçalves, F. L. T., and Bigg, E. K.: Urediospores of rust fungi are ice nucleation active at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and harbor ice nucleation active bacteria, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4223–4233, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4223-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4223-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mülmenstädt, J., Sourdeval, O., Delanoë, J., and Quaas, J.:
Frequency of occurrence of rain from liquid-, mixed-, and ice-phase clouds
derived from A-Train satellite retrievals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
6502–6509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064604" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL064604</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murray, B. J., O'Sullivan, D., Atkinson, J. D., and Webb, M. E.: Ice
nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 41, 6519–6554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35200a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c2cs35200a</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E.: Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter, in: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Series No. 5, edited by: Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., Loeppert, R. H., Soltanpour, P. N., Tabatabai, M. A., Johnston, C. T., and Sumner, M. E., SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, 961-1010, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Hoose, C., Connolly, P.,
Klein, H., Bingemer, H., DeMott, P., Skrotzki, J., and Leisner, T.: A
particle-surface-area-based parameterization of immersion freezing on desert
dust particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3077–3092,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>O'Sullivan, D., Murray, B. J., Malkin, T. L., Whale, T. F., Umo, N. S., Atkinson, J. D., Price, H. C., Baustian, K. J., Browse, J., and Webb, M. E.: Ice nucleation by fertile soil dusts: relative importance of mineral and biogenic components, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1853–1867, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1853-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1853-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>O'Sullivan, D., Adams, M. P., Tarn, M. D., Harrison, A. D.,
Vergara-Temprado, J., Porter, G. C. E., Holden, M. A., Sanchez-Marroquin,
A., Carotenuto, F., Whale, T. F., McQuaid, J. B., Walshaw, R., Hedges, D. H.
P., Burke, I. T., Cui, Z., and Murray, B. J.: Contributions of biogenic
material to the atmospheric ice-nucleating particle population in North
Western Europe, Scientific Reports,  8, 13821,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31981-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-31981-7</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paramonov, M., David, R. O., Kretzschmar, R., and Kanji, Z. A.: A laboratory investigation of the ice nucleation efficiency of three types of mineral and soil dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16515–16536, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16515-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-16515-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Perez, A. E. and Gill, T. E.: Salt Flat Basin’s contribution to regional
dust production and potential influence on dry deposition in
the Guadalupe Mountains (Texas, USA), Nat. Resour. Env. Iss., 110
15, 117–128, <uri>https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/nrei/vol15/iss1/20</uri> (last access: 3 November 2011), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Perkins, R. J., Gillette, S. M., Hill, T. C. J., and DeMott, P. J.: The
labile nature of ice nucleation by Arizona Test Dust, ACS Earth Space Chem.,
4, 133–141, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00304</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pinti, V., Marcolli, C., Zobrist, B., Hoyle, C. R., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation efficiency of clay minerals in the immersion mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5859–5878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5859-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5859-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Price, H. C., Baustian, K. J., McQuaid, J. B., Blyth, A., Bower, K. N.,
Choularton, T., Cotton, R. J., Cui, Z., Field, P. R., Gallagher, M., Hawker,
R., Merrington, A., Miltenberger, A., Neely III, R. R., Parker, S. T.,
Rosenberg, P. D., Taylor, J. W., Trembath, J., Vergara-Temprado, J., Whale,
T. F., Wilson, T. W., Young, G., and Murray, B. J.: Atmospheric
Ice-Nucleating Particles in the Dusty Tropical Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.,
123, 2175–2193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jd027560" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017jd027560</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Proske, U., Bessenbacher, V., Dedekind, Z., Lohmann, U., and Neubauer, D.: How frequent is natural cloud seeding from ice cloud layers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal"> </mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) over Switzerland?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5195–5216, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5195-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-5195-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prospero, J. M., Ginoux, P., Torres, O., Nicholson, S. E., and Gill, T. E.:
Environmental characterization of global sources of atmospheric soil dust
identified with the Nimbus 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS)
absorbing aerosol product, Rev. Geophys., 40, 2-1–2-31,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000RG000095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000RG000095</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Purdy, J. C., Austin, G. L., Seed, A. W., and Cluckie, I. D.: Radar evidence
of orographic enhancement due to the seeder feeder mechanism, Meteorol.
Appl., 12, 199–206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482705001672" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S1350482705001672</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ramelli, F., Henneberger, J., David, R. O., Bühl, J., Radenz, M., Seifert, P., Wieder, J., Lauber, A., Pasquier, J. T., Engelmann, R., Mignani, C., Hervo, M., and Lohmann, U.: Microphysical investigation of the seeder and feeder region of an Alpine mixed-phase cloud, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6681–6706, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6681-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-6681-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rhoades, J. D.: Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids, in: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3, Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Ser, 5.3, edited by: Sparks, D. L., SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, 417–435, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rowley, M. C., Grand, S., and Verrecchia, É. P.: Calcium-mediated
stabilisation of soil organic carbon, Biogeochemistry, 137, 27–49,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0410-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-017-0410-1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schrod, J., Weber, D., Drücke, J., Keleshis, C., Pikridas, M., Ebert, M., Cvetković, B., Nickovic, S., Marinou, E., Baars, H., Ansmann, A., Vrekoussis, M., Mihalopoulos, N., Sciare, J., Curtius, J., and Bingemer, H. G.: Ice nucleating particles over the Eastern Mediterranean measured by unmanned aircraft systems, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4817–4835, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4817-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4817-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scudiero, E., Skaggs, T. H., and Corwin, D. L.: Regional-Scale soil salinity
assessment using Landsat ETM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> canopy reflectance, Remote Sens. Environ.,
169, 335–343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.026</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shadkam, S., Ludwig, F., van Oel, P., Kirmit, Ç., and Kabat, P.: Impacts
of climate change and water resources development on the declining inflow
into Iran's Urmia Lake, J. Great Lakes Res., 42, 942–952,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2016.07.033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jglr.2016.07.033</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sharifi, A., Shah-Hosseini, M., Pourmand, A., Esfahaninejad, M., and
Haeri-Ardakani, O.: The vanishing of Urmia Lake: A geolimnological
perspective on the hydrological imbalance of the world's second largest
hypersaline lake, in: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Springer,
Berlin, Heidelberg, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2018_359" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/698_2018_359</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sotoudeheian, S., Salim, R., and Arhami, M.: Impact of Middle Eastern dust
sources on PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Iran: Highlighting the impact of Tigris-Euphrates
basin sources and Lake Urmia desiccation, J. Geophys. Res., 121,
14018–14034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025119</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., and Loeppert, R. H. (Eds.).:  Methods of soil analysis, part 3: Chemical methods (Vol. 14), John Wiley &amp; Sons, ISBN-10:0-89118-825-8, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Steinke, I., Funk, R., Busse, J., Iturri, A., Kirchen, S., Leue, M.,
Möhler, O., Schwartz, T., Schnaiter, M., Sierau, B., Toprak, E.,
Ullrich, R., Ulrich, A., Hoose, C., and Leisner, T.: Ice nucleation activity
of agricultural soil dust aerosols from Mongolia, Argentina, and Germany, J.
Geophys. Res., 121, 13559–13576, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025160</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Steinke, I., Hiranuma, N., Funk, R., Höhler, K., Tüllmann, N., Umo, N. S., Weidler, P. G., Möhler, O., and Leisner, T.: Complex plant-derived organic aerosol as ice-nucleating particles – more than the sums of their parts?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11387–11397, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11387-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11387-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Suski, K. J., Hill, T. C. J., Levin, E. J. T., Miller, A., DeMott, P. J., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Agricultural harvesting emissions of ice-nucleating particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13755–13771, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13755-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-13755-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sweeney, M. R., Zlotnik, V. A., Joeckel, R. M., and Stout, J. E.: Geomorphic
and hydrologic controls of dust emissions during drought from Yellow Lake
playa, West Texas, USA, J. Arid Environ., 133, 37–46,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.05.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.05.007</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Testa, B., Hill, T. C. J., Marsden, N. A., Barry, K. R., Hume, C. C., Bian,
Q., Uetake, J, Hare, H., Perkins, R. J., Möhler, O., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
and DeMott, P. J.: Ice nucleating particle connections to regional
Argentinian land surface emissions and weather during the Cloud, Aerosol,
and Complex Terrain Interactions experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 126,
e2021JD035186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035186" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JD035186</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tobo, Y., Prenni, A. J., DeMott, P. J., Huffman, J. A., McCluskey, C. S.,
Tian, G. , Pöhlker, C., Pöschl, U., and Kreidenweis, S. M.:
Biological aerosol particles as a key determinant of ice nuclei populations
in a forest ecosystem, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 10100–10110,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50801" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50801</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tobo, Y., DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., Prenni, A. J., Swoboda-Colberg, N. G., Franc, G. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Organic matter matters for ice nuclei of agricultural soil origin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8521–8531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8521-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8521-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Varga, G., Újvári, G., and Kovács, J.: Spatiotemporal patterns
of Saharan dust outbreaks in the Mediterranean Basin, Aeolian Res., 15,
151–160, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.06.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.06.005</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, B. and Knopf, D. A.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on particles
composed of humic-like substances impacted by O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Geophys. Res.,
116, D03205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd014964</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Washington, R., Todd, M. C., Lizcano, G., Tegen, I., Flamant, C., Koren, I.,
Ginoux, P., Engelstaedter, S., Bristow, C. S., Zender, C. S., Goudie, A. S.,
Warren, A., and Prospero, J. M.: Links between topography, wind, deflation,
lakes and dust: The case of the Bodélé Depression, Chad, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 33, L09401, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL025827</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Welti, A., Müller, K., Fleming, Z. L., and Stratmann, F.: Concentration and variability of ice nuclei in the subtropical maritime boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5307–5320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5307-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-5307-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Welti, A., Lohmann, U., and Kanji, Z. A.: Ice nucleation properties of K-feldspar polymorphs and plagioclase feldspars, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10901–10918, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10901-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-10901-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Welti, A., Bigg, E. K., DeMott, P. J., Gong, X., Hartmann, M., Harvey, M., Henning, S., Herenz, P., Hill, T. C. J., Hornblow, B., Leck, C., Löffler, M., McCluskey, C. S., Rauker, A. M., Schmale, J., Tatzelt, C., van Pinxteren, M., and Stratmann, F.: Ship-based measurements of ice nuclei concentrations over the Arctic, Atlantic, Pacific and Southern oceans, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15191–15206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15191-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-15191-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Whale, T. F.: Disordering effect of the ammonium cation accounts for
anomalous enhancement of heterogeneous ice nucleation, J. Chem. Phys., 156, 144503, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0084635" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/5.0084635</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Whale, T. F., Holden, M. A., Wilson, T. W., O'Sullivan, D., and Murray, B.
J.: The enhancement and suppression of immersion mode heterogeneous
ice-nucleation by solutes, Chem. Sci., 9, 4142–4151,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC05421A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C7SC05421A</ext-link>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yun, J., Link, N., Kumar, A., Shchukarev, A., Davidson, J., Lam, A.,
Walters, C., Xi, Y., Boily, J.-F., and Bertram, A. K.: Surface composition
dependence on the ice nucleating ability of potassium-rich feldspar, ACS
Earth Space Chem., 4, 873–881, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00077</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zobrist, B., Marcolli, C., Peter, T., and Koop, T.: Heterogeneous ice
nucleation in aqueous solutions: the role of water activity, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 3965–3975, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp7112208" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp7112208</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zolles, T., Burkart, J., Häusler, T., Pummer, B., Hitzenberger, R., and
Grothe, H.: Identification of ice nucleation active sites on feldspar dust
particles, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 2692–2700,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509839x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp509839x</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zuend, A., Marcolli, C., Luo, B. P., and Peter, T.: A thermodynamic model of mixed organic-inorganic aerosols to predict activity coefficients, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4559–4593, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4559-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-4559-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zuend, A., Marcolli, C., Booth, A. M., Lienhard, D. M., Soonsin, V., Krieger, U. K., Topping, D. O., McFiggans, G., Peter, T., and Seinfeld, J. H.: New and extended parameterization of the thermodynamic model AIOMFAC: calculation of activity coefficients for organic-inorganic mixtures containing carboxyl, hydroxyl, carbonyl, ether, ester, alkenyl, alkyl, and aromatic functional groups, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9155–9206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9155-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9155-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The Urmia playa as a source of airborne dust and ice-nucleating particles – Part 2: Unraveling the relationship between soil dust composition and ice nucleation activity</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abuduwaili, J., Liu, D., and Wu, G.: Saline dust storms and their ecological
impacts in arid regions, J. Arid Land, 2, 144–50,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1227.2010.00144" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1227.2010.00144</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ahmady-Birgani, H., Ravan, P., Schlosser, J. S., Cuevas-Robles, A.,
AzadiAghdam, M., and Sorooshian, A.: On the chemical nature of wet
deposition over a major desiccated lake: Case study for Lake Urmia basin,
Atmos. Res., 234, 104762, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104762" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104762</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K.
J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S., O'Sullivan, D., and Malkin, T. L.: The
importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase
clouds, Nature, 498, 355–358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bigg, E.: Ice Nucleus Concentrations in Remote Areas, J. Atmos. Sci., 30,
1153–1157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1973)030&lt;1153:INCIRA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1973)030&lt;1153:INCIRA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bish, D. L. and Plötze, M.: X-ray Powder Diffraction with Emphasis on
Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis in Industrial Mineralogy, in: Advances
in the characterization of industrial minerals, edited by: Christidis, G. E., EMU and Mineralogical Society, London, 9, 35–76, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bogler, S. and Borduas-Dedekind, N.: Lignin's ability to nucleate ice via immersion freezing and its stability towards physicochemical treatments and atmospheric processing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14509–14522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14509-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14509-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Boose, Y., Welti, A., Atkinson, J., Ramelli, F., Danielczok, A., Bingemer, H. G., Plötze, M., Sierau, B., Kanji, Z. A., and Lohmann, U.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on dust particles sourced from nine deserts worldwide – Part 1: Immersion freezing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15075–15095, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15075-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15075-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Boose, Y., Baloh, P., Plötze, M., Ofner, J., Grothe, H., Sierau, B., Lohmann, U., and Kanji, Z. A.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on dust particles sourced from nine deserts worldwide – Part 2: Deposition nucleation and condensation freezing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1059–1076, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1059-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1059-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Borduas-Dedekind, N., Ossola, R., David, R. O., Boynton, L. S., Weichlinger, V., Kanji, Z. A., and McNeill, K.: Photomineralization mechanism changes the ability of dissolved organic matter to activate cloud droplets and to nucleate ice crystals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12397–12412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12397-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12397-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Boroughani, M., Hashemi, H., Hosseini, S. H., Pourhashemi, S., and
Berndtsson, R.: Desiccating Lake Urmia: A new dust source of regional
importance, IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 17, 1483–1487,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2019.2949132" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2019.2949132</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Brunner, C., Brem, B. T., Collaud Coen, M., Conen, F., Hervo, M., Henne, S., Steinbacher, M., Gysel-Beer, M., and Kanji, Z. A.: The contribution of Saharan dust to the ice-nucleating particle concentrations at the High Altitude Station Jungfraujoch (3580&thinsp;m a.s.l.), Switzerland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18029–18053, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18029-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18029-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, J., Wu, Z., Chen, J., Reicher, N., Fang, X., Rudich, Y., and Hu, M.: Size-resolved atmospheric ice-nucleating particles during East Asian dust events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3491–3506, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3491-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3491-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Conen, F., Morris, C. E., Leifeld, J., Yakutin, M. V., and Alewell, C.: Biological residues define the ice nucleation properties of soil dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9643–9648, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9643-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9643-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Daily, M. I., Tarn, M. D., Whale, T. F., and Murray, B. J.: An evaluation of the heat test for the ice-nucleating ability of minerals and biological material, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2635–2665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2635-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2635-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Dane, J. H. and Topp, C. G. (Eds.): Methods of soil analysis, Part 4: Physical methods, Vol. 20, John Wiley and Sons, ISBN:&thinsp;089118841X, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.:
Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on
climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., McMeeking, G. R., Sullivan, R. C., Petters, M. D., Tobo, Y., Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Snider, J. R., Wang, Z., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Integrating laboratory and field data to quantify the immersion freezing ice nucleation activity of mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 393–409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-393-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-393-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Després, V. R., Huffman, J. A., Burrows, S. M., Hoose, C., Safatov, A.,
Buryak, G., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Elbert, W., Andreae, M. O.,
Pöschl, U., and Jaenicke, R.: Primary biological aerosol particles in
the atmosphere: a review, Tellus B, 64, 15598,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Farokhnia, A. and Morid, S.: Assessment of the effects of temperature and
precipitation variations on the trend of river flows in Urmia Lake
watershed, Journal of Water and Wastewater, 25, 86–97, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Field, P. R. and Heymsfield, A. J.: Importance of snow to global
precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 9512–9520, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065497" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065497</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Fornea, A. P., Brooks, S. D., Dooley, J. B., and Saha, A.: Heterogeneous
freezing of ice on atmospheric aerosols containing ash, soot, and soil, J.
Geophys. Res., 114, D13201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011958" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011958</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Giannetta, B., Plaza, C., Vischetti, C., Cotrufo, M. F., and Zaccone, C.:
Distribution and thermal stability of physically and chemically protected
organic matter fractions in soils across different ecosystems, Biol. Fert.
Soils, 54, 671–681, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-018-1290-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-018-1290-9</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Goodman, M. M., Carling, G. T., Fernandez, D. P., Rey, K. A., Hale, C. A.,
Bickmore, B. R., Nelson, S. T., and Munroe, J. S.: Trace element chemistry
of atmospheric deposition along the Wasatch Front (Utah, USA) reflects
regional playa dust and local urban aerosols, Chem. Geol., 530, 119317,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.119317" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.119317</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gorji, T., Yildirim, A., Hamzehpour, N., Tanik, A., and Sertel, E.: Soil
salinity analysis of Urmia Lake Basin using Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2A
based spectral indices and electrical conductivity measurements, Ecol.
Indic., 112, 106173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106173" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106173</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hamzehpour, N.: The Urmia Playa as source of airborne dust and ice nucleating particles – Part 2: Unraveling the relationship between soil dust composition and ice-nucleation activity, ETH Zurich [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000564710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000564710</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hamzehpour, N., Eghbal, M. K., Abasiyan, S. M. A., and Dill, H. G.:
Pedogenic evidence of Urmia Lake's maximum expansion in the late Quaternary,
CATENA, 171, 398–415, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.019</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hamzehpour, N., Marcolli, C., Pashai, S., Klumpp, K., and Peter, T.: Measurement report: The Urmia playa as a source of
airborne dust and ice-nucleating particles – Part 1:
Correlation between soils and airborne samples, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14905–14930, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14905-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14905-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, A. D., Whale, T. F., Carpenter, M. A., Holden, M. A., Neve, L., O'Sullivan, D., Vergara Temprado, J., and Murray, B. J.: Not all feldspars are equal: a survey of ice nucleating properties across the feldspar group of minerals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10927–10940, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10927-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10927-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, A. D., Lever, K., Sanchez-Marroquin, A., Holden, M. A., Whale, T. F., Tarn, M. D., McQuaid, J. B., and Murray, B. J.: The ice-nucleating ability of quartz immersed in water and its atmospheric importance compared to K-feldspar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11343–11361, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11343-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11343-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, T. C. J., DeMott, P. J., Tobo, Y., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Moffett, B. F., Franc, G. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Sources of organic ice nucleating particles in soils, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7195–7211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hiranuma, N., Möhler, O., Yamashita, K., Tajiri, T., Saito, A., Kiselev,
A., Hoffmann, N., Hoose, C., Jantsch, E., Koop, T., and Murakami, M.: Ice
nucleation by cellulose and its potential contribution to ice formation in
clouds, Nat. Geosci., 8, 273–277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2374" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2374</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hiranuma, N., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Bingemer, H., Budke, C., Curtius, J., Danielczok, A., Diehl, K., Dreischmeier, K., Ebert, M., Frank, F., Hoffmann, N., Kandler, K., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Leisner, T., Möhler, O., Nillius, B., Peckhaus, A., Rose, D., Weinbruch, S., Wex, H., Boose, Y., DeMott, P. J., Hader, J. D., Hill, T. C. J., Kanji, Z. A., Kulkarni, G., Levin, E. J. T., McCluskey, C. S., Murakami, M., Murray, B. J., Niedermeier, D., Petters, M. D., O'Sullivan, D., Saito, A., Schill, G. P., Tajiri, T., Tolbert, M. A., Welti, A., Whale, T. F., Wright, T. P., and Yamashita, K.: A comprehensive laboratory study on the immersion freezing behavior of illite NX particles: a comparison of 17 ice nucleation measurement techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2489–2518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015</a>,
2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hiranuma, N., Adachi, K., Bell, D. M., Belosi, F., Beydoun, H., Bhaduri, B., Bingemer, H., Budke, C., Clemen, H.-C., Conen, F., Cory, K. M., Curtius, J., DeMott, P. J., Eppers, O., Grawe, S., Hartmann, S., Hoffmann, N., Höhler, K., Jantsch, E., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Kulkarni, G., Mayer, A., Murakami, M., Murray, B. J., Nicosia, A., Petters, M. D., Piazza, M., Polen, M., Reicher, N., Rudich, Y., Saito, A., Santachiara, G., Schiebel, T., Schill, G. P., Schneider, J., Segev, L., Stopelli, E., Sullivan, R. C., Suski, K., Szakáll, M., Tajiri, T., Taylor, H., Tobo, Y., Ullrich, R., Weber, D., Wex, H., Whale, T. F., Whiteside, C. L., Yamashita, K., Zelenyuk, A., and Möhler, O.: A comprehensive characterization of ice nucleation by three different types of cellulose particles immersed in water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4823–4849, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4823-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4823-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, S., Hu, W., Chen, J., Wu, Z. J., Zhang, D. Z., and Fu, P. Q.:
Overview of biological ice nucleating particles in the atmosphere, Environ.
Int., 146, 106197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106197" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106197</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2391 pp., 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, M. L.: Soil chemical analysis-advanced course, University of
Wisconsin, College of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science, Madison, WI,
991 pp., 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Jananee, B., Thangam, V., and Rajalakshmi, A.: Investigation of soils by
thermal and spectroscopic analysis, Chem. Eng. Commun., 208, 812–821,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2019.1680370" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2019.1680370</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, L., Jiapaer, G., Bao, A., Li, Y., Guo, H., Zheng, G., Chen, T., and De
Maeyer, P.: Assessing land degradation and quantifying its drivers in the
Amudarya River delta, Ecol. Indic., 107, 105595,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105595" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105595</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo,
D. J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of ice nucleating particles, Meteor. Mon., 58, 1.1–1.33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0006.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0006.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kaufmann, L., Marcolli, C., Hofer, J., Pinti, V., Hoyle, C. R., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation efficiency of natural dust samples in the immersion mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11177–11206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11177-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11177-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kittrick, J. A. and Hope, E. W.: A procedure for the particle-size
separation of soils for X-ray diffraction analysis, Soil Sci., 96, 319–325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196311000-00006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196311000-00006</a>, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kleber, M., Bourg, I. C., Coward, E. K., Hansel, C. M., Myeneni, S. C. B.,
and Nunan, N.: Dynamic interactions at the mineral–organic matter
interface, Nature Reviews Earth &amp; Environment, 2, 402–421,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Klumpp, K., Marcolli, C., and Peter, T.: The Impact of (bio-)organic substances on the ice nucleation activity of the K-feldspar microcline in aqueous solutions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3655–3673, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3655-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3655-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A. and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–614, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, A., Marcolli, C., Luo, B., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation activity of silicates and aluminosilicates in pure water and aqueous solutions – Part 1: The K-feldspar microcline, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7057–7079, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7057-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7057-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, A., Marcolli, C., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation activity of silicates and aluminosilicates in pure water and aqueous solutions – Part 2: Quartz and amorphous silica, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6035–6058, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6035-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6035-2019</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, A., Marcolli, C., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation activity of silicates and aluminosilicates in pure water and aqueous solutions – Part 3: Aluminosilicates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6059–6084, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6059-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6059-2019</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Lacher, L., Steinbacher, M., Bukowiecki, N., Herrmann, E., Zipori, A., and
Kanji, Z. A.: Impact of air mass conditions and aerosol properties on ice
nucleating particle concentrations at the high altitude research station
Jungfraujoch, Atmosphere, 9, 363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9090363" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9090363</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Lacher, L., Clemen, H.-C., Shen, X., Mertes, S., Gysel-Beer, M., Moallemi, A., Steinbacher, M., Henne, S., Saathoff, H., Möhler, O., Höhler, K., Schiebel, T., Weber, D., Schrod, J., Schneider, J., and Kanji, Z. A.: Sources and nature of ice-nucleating particles in the free troposphere at Jungfraujoch in winter 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16925–16953, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16925-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16925-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Lohmann, U.: Aerosol effects on clouds and climate, Space Sci. Rev., 125,
129–137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9051-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9051-8</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Lohmann, U. and Neubauer, D.: The importance of mixed-phase and ice clouds for climate sensitivity in the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8807–8828, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8807-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8807-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Marcolli, C., Gedamke, S., Peter, T., and Zobrist, B.: Efficiency of immersion mode ice nucleation on surrogates of mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5081–5091, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5081-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5081-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Morris, C. E., Sands, D. C., Glaux, C., Samsatly, J., Asaad, S., Moukahel, A. R., Gonçalves, F. L. T., and Bigg, E. K.: Urediospores of rust fungi are ice nucleation active at  &gt; −10°C and harbor ice nucleation active bacteria, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4223–4233, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4223-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4223-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Mülmenstädt, J., Sourdeval, O., Delanoë, J., and Quaas, J.:
Frequency of occurrence of rain from liquid-, mixed-, and ice-phase clouds
derived from A-Train satellite retrievals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
6502–6509, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064604" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064604</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, B. J., O'Sullivan, D., Atkinson, J. D., and Webb, M. E.: Ice
nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 41, 6519–6554, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35200a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35200a</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E.: Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter, in: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Series No. 5, edited by: Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., Loeppert, R. H., Soltanpour, P. N., Tabatabai, M. A., Johnston, C. T., and Sumner, M. E., SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, 961-1010, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Hoose, C., Connolly, P.,
Klein, H., Bingemer, H., DeMott, P., Skrotzki, J., and Leisner, T.: A
particle-surface-area-based parameterization of immersion freezing on desert
dust particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3077–3092,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
O'Sullivan, D., Murray, B. J., Malkin, T. L., Whale, T. F., Umo, N. S., Atkinson, J. D., Price, H. C., Baustian, K. J., Browse, J., and Webb, M. E.: Ice nucleation by fertile soil dusts: relative importance of mineral and biogenic components, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1853–1867, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1853-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1853-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
O'Sullivan, D., Adams, M. P., Tarn, M. D., Harrison, A. D.,
Vergara-Temprado, J., Porter, G. C. E., Holden, M. A., Sanchez-Marroquin,
A., Carotenuto, F., Whale, T. F., McQuaid, J. B., Walshaw, R., Hedges, D. H.
P., Burke, I. T., Cui, Z., and Murray, B. J.: Contributions of biogenic
material to the atmospheric ice-nucleating particle population in North
Western Europe, Scientific Reports,  8, 13821,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31981-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31981-7</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Paramonov, M., David, R. O., Kretzschmar, R., and Kanji, Z. A.: A laboratory investigation of the ice nucleation efficiency of three types of mineral and soil dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16515–16536, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16515-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16515-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Perez, A. E. and Gill, T. E.: Salt Flat Basin’s contribution to regional
dust production and potential influence on dry deposition in
the Guadalupe Mountains (Texas, USA), Nat. Resour. Env. Iss., 110
15, 117–128, <a href="https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/nrei/vol15/iss1/20" target="_blank"/> (last access: 3 November 2011), 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Perkins, R. J., Gillette, S. M., Hill, T. C. J., and DeMott, P. J.: The
labile nature of ice nucleation by Arizona Test Dust, ACS Earth Space Chem.,
4, 133–141, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00304" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00304</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Pinti, V., Marcolli, C., Zobrist, B., Hoyle, C. R., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation efficiency of clay minerals in the immersion mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5859–5878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5859-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5859-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Price, H. C., Baustian, K. J., McQuaid, J. B., Blyth, A., Bower, K. N.,
Choularton, T., Cotton, R. J., Cui, Z., Field, P. R., Gallagher, M., Hawker,
R., Merrington, A., Miltenberger, A., Neely III, R. R., Parker, S. T.,
Rosenberg, P. D., Taylor, J. W., Trembath, J., Vergara-Temprado, J., Whale,
T. F., Wilson, T. W., Young, G., and Murray, B. J.: Atmospheric
Ice-Nucleating Particles in the Dusty Tropical Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.,
123, 2175–2193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jd027560" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jd027560</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Proske, U., Bessenbacher, V., Dedekind, Z., Lohmann, U., and Neubauer, D.: How frequent is natural cloud seeding from ice cloud layers ( &lt;  −35&thinsp;°C) over Switzerland?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5195–5216, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5195-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5195-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M., Ginoux, P., Torres, O., Nicholson, S. E., and Gill, T. E.:
Environmental characterization of global sources of atmospheric soil dust
identified with the Nimbus 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS)
absorbing aerosol product, Rev. Geophys., 40, 2-1–2-31,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000RG000095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000RG000095</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Purdy, J. C., Austin, G. L., Seed, A. W., and Cluckie, I. D.: Radar evidence
of orographic enhancement due to the seeder feeder mechanism, Meteorol.
Appl., 12, 199–206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482705001672" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482705001672</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Ramelli, F., Henneberger, J., David, R. O., Bühl, J., Radenz, M., Seifert, P., Wieder, J., Lauber, A., Pasquier, J. T., Engelmann, R., Mignani, C., Hervo, M., and Lohmann, U.: Microphysical investigation of the seeder and feeder region of an Alpine mixed-phase cloud, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6681–6706, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6681-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6681-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Rhoades, J. D.: Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids, in: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3, Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Ser, 5.3, edited by: Sparks, D. L., SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, 417–435, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Rowley, M. C., Grand, S., and Verrecchia, É. P.: Calcium-mediated
stabilisation of soil organic carbon, Biogeochemistry, 137, 27–49,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0410-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0410-1</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Schrod, J., Weber, D., Drücke, J., Keleshis, C., Pikridas, M., Ebert, M., Cvetković, B., Nickovic, S., Marinou, E., Baars, H., Ansmann, A., Vrekoussis, M., Mihalopoulos, N., Sciare, J., Curtius, J., and Bingemer, H. G.: Ice nucleating particles over the Eastern Mediterranean measured by unmanned aircraft systems, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4817–4835, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4817-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4817-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Scudiero, E., Skaggs, T. H., and Corwin, D. L.: Regional-Scale soil salinity
assessment using Landsat ETM+ canopy reflectance, Remote Sens. Environ.,
169, 335–343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.026</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Shadkam, S., Ludwig, F., van Oel, P., Kirmit, Ç., and Kabat, P.: Impacts
of climate change and water resources development on the declining inflow
into Iran's Urmia Lake, J. Great Lakes Res., 42, 942–952,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2016.07.033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2016.07.033</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Sharifi, A., Shah-Hosseini, M., Pourmand, A., Esfahaninejad, M., and
Haeri-Ardakani, O.: The vanishing of Urmia Lake: A geolimnological
perspective on the hydrological imbalance of the world's second largest
hypersaline lake, in: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Springer,
Berlin, Heidelberg, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2018_359" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2018_359</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Sotoudeheian, S., Salim, R., and Arhami, M.: Impact of Middle Eastern dust
sources on PM<sub>10</sub> in Iran: Highlighting the impact of Tigris-Euphrates
basin sources and Lake Urmia desiccation, J. Geophys. Res., 121,
14018–14034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025119" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025119</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., and Loeppert, R. H. (Eds.).:  Methods of soil analysis, part 3: Chemical methods (Vol. 14), John Wiley &amp; Sons, ISBN-10:0-89118-825-8, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Steinke, I., Funk, R., Busse, J., Iturri, A., Kirchen, S., Leue, M.,
Möhler, O., Schwartz, T., Schnaiter, M., Sierau, B., Toprak, E.,
Ullrich, R., Ulrich, A., Hoose, C., and Leisner, T.: Ice nucleation activity
of agricultural soil dust aerosols from Mongolia, Argentina, and Germany, J.
Geophys. Res., 121, 13559–13576, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025160</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Steinke, I., Hiranuma, N., Funk, R., Höhler, K., Tüllmann, N., Umo, N. S., Weidler, P. G., Möhler, O., and Leisner, T.: Complex plant-derived organic aerosol as ice-nucleating particles – more than the sums of their parts?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11387–11397, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11387-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11387-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Suski, K. J., Hill, T. C. J., Levin, E. J. T., Miller, A., DeMott, P. J., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Agricultural harvesting emissions of ice-nucleating particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13755–13771, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13755-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13755-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Sweeney, M. R., Zlotnik, V. A., Joeckel, R. M., and Stout, J. E.: Geomorphic
and hydrologic controls of dust emissions during drought from Yellow Lake
playa, West Texas, USA, J. Arid Environ., 133, 37–46,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.05.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.05.007</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Testa, B., Hill, T. C. J., Marsden, N. A., Barry, K. R., Hume, C. C., Bian,
Q., Uetake, J, Hare, H., Perkins, R. J., Möhler, O., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
and DeMott, P. J.: Ice nucleating particle connections to regional
Argentinian land surface emissions and weather during the Cloud, Aerosol,
and Complex Terrain Interactions experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 126,
e2021JD035186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035186" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035186</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Tobo, Y., Prenni, A. J., DeMott, P. J., Huffman, J. A., McCluskey, C. S.,
Tian, G. , Pöhlker, C., Pöschl, U., and Kreidenweis, S. M.:
Biological aerosol particles as a key determinant of ice nuclei populations
in a forest ecosystem, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 10100–10110,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50801" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50801</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Tobo, Y., DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., Prenni, A. J., Swoboda-Colberg, N. G., Franc, G. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Organic matter matters for ice nuclei of agricultural soil origin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8521–8531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8521-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8521-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Varga, G., Újvári, G., and Kovács, J.: Spatiotemporal patterns
of Saharan dust outbreaks in the Mediterranean Basin, Aeolian Res., 15,
151–160, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.06.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.06.005</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, B. and Knopf, D. A.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on particles
composed of humic-like substances impacted by O<sub>3</sub>, J. Geophys. Res.,
116, D03205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014964" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014964</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Washington, R., Todd, M. C., Lizcano, G., Tegen, I., Flamant, C., Koren, I.,
Ginoux, P., Engelstaedter, S., Bristow, C. S., Zender, C. S., Goudie, A. S.,
Warren, A., and Prospero, J. M.: Links between topography, wind, deflation,
lakes and dust: The case of the Bodélé Depression, Chad, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 33, L09401, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025827" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025827</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Welti, A., Müller, K., Fleming, Z. L., and Stratmann, F.: Concentration and variability of ice nuclei in the subtropical maritime boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5307–5320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5307-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5307-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Welti, A., Lohmann, U., and Kanji, Z. A.: Ice nucleation properties of K-feldspar polymorphs and plagioclase feldspars, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10901–10918, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10901-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10901-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Welti, A., Bigg, E. K., DeMott, P. J., Gong, X., Hartmann, M., Harvey, M., Henning, S., Herenz, P., Hill, T. C. J., Hornblow, B., Leck, C., Löffler, M., McCluskey, C. S., Rauker, A. M., Schmale, J., Tatzelt, C., van Pinxteren, M., and Stratmann, F.: Ship-based measurements of ice nuclei concentrations over the Arctic, Atlantic, Pacific and Southern oceans, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15191–15206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15191-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15191-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Whale, T. F.: Disordering effect of the ammonium cation accounts for
anomalous enhancement of heterogeneous ice nucleation, J. Chem. Phys., 156, 144503, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0084635" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0084635</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Whale, T. F., Holden, M. A., Wilson, T. W., O'Sullivan, D., and Murray, B.
J.: The enhancement and suppression of immersion mode heterogeneous
ice-nucleation by solutes, Chem. Sci., 9, 4142–4151,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC05421A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC05421A</a>, 2018.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Yun, J., Link, N., Kumar, A., Shchukarev, A., Davidson, J., Lam, A.,
Walters, C., Xi, Y., Boily, J.-F., and Bertram, A. K.: Surface composition
dependence on the ice nucleating ability of potassium-rich feldspar, ACS
Earth Space Chem., 4, 873–881, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00077</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Zobrist, B., Marcolli, C., Peter, T., and Koop, T.: Heterogeneous ice
nucleation in aqueous solutions: the role of water activity, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 3965–3975, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp7112208" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp7112208</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Zolles, T., Burkart, J., Häusler, T., Pummer, B., Hitzenberger, R., and
Grothe, H.: Identification of ice nucleation active sites on feldspar dust
particles, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 2692–2700,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509839x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509839x</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Zuend, A., Marcolli, C., Luo, B. P., and Peter, T.: A thermodynamic model of mixed organic-inorganic aerosols to predict activity coefficients, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4559–4593, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4559-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4559-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Zuend, A., Marcolli, C., Booth, A. M., Lienhard, D. M., Soonsin, V., Krieger, U. K., Topping, D. O., McFiggans, G., Peter, T., and Seinfeld, J. H.: New and extended parameterization of the thermodynamic model AIOMFAC: calculation of activity coefficients for organic-inorganic mixtures containing carboxyl, hydroxyl, carbonyl, ether, ester, alkenyl, alkyl, and aromatic functional groups, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9155–9206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9155-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9155-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
