<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-14825-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Constraining the particle-scale diversity of black carbon light absorption
using a unified framework</article-title><alt-title>Constraining the particle-scale diversity of BC light absorption</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Constraining the particle-scale diversity of BC light absorption}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P.~Beeler and R.~K.~Chakrabarty}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Beeler</surname><given-names>Payton</given-names></name>
          <email>beelerpayton@wustl.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4759-1461</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Chakrabarty</surname><given-names>Rajan K.</given-names></name>
          <email>chakrabarty@wustl.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5753-9937</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Center for Aerosol Science and Engineering, Department of Energy,
Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis,
St. Louis, MO 63130, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Rajan K. Chakrabarty (chakrabarty@wustl.edu) and<?xmltex \hack{\break}?>
Payton Beeler (beelerpayton@wustl.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>November</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>14825</fpage><lpage>14836</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>April</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>5</day><month>May</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>September</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>September</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e92">Atmospheric black carbon (BC), the strongest absorber of
visible solar radiation in the atmosphere, manifests across a wide spectrum
of morphologies and compositional heterogeneity. Phenomenologically, the
distribution of BC among diverse particles of varied composition gives rise
to enhancement of its light absorption capabilities by over twofold in
comparison to that of nascent or unmixed homogeneous BC. This situation has
challenged the modeling community to consider the full complexity and
diversity of BC on a per-particle basis for accurate estimation of its light
absorption. The conventionally adopted core–shell approximation, although
computationally inexpensive, is inadequate not only in estimating but also
capturing absorption trends for ambient BC. Here we develop a unified
framework that encompasses the complex diversity in BC morphology and
composition using a single metric, the phase shift parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which quantifies how much phase shift the incoming light waves encounter
across a particle compared to that in its absence. We systematically
investigate variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the multi-space distribution of
BC morphology, mixing state, mass, and composition as reported by field and
laboratory observations. We find that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to
decreased absorption by BC, which explains the weaker absorption
enhancements observed in certain regional BC compared to laboratory results
of similar mixing state. We formulate universal scaling laws centered on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and provide physics-based insights regarding core–shell
approximation overestimating BC light absorption. We conclude by packaging
our framework in an open-source Python application to facilitate
community-level use in future BC-related research. The package has two main
functionalities. The first functionality is for forward problems, wherein
experimentally measured BC mixing state and assumed BC morphology are input,
and the aerosol absorption properties are output. The second functionality
is for inverse problems, wherein experimentally measured BC mixing state and
absorption are input, and the morphology of BC is returned. Further, if
absorption is measured at multiple wavelengths, the package facilitates the
estimation of the imaginary refractive index of coating materials by combining
the forward and inverse procedures. Our framework thus provides a
computationally inexpensive source for calculation of absorption by BC and
can be used to constrain light absorption throughout the atmospheric
lifetime of BC.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e152">The contribution of aerosols to global radiative forcing remains one of the
largest sources of uncertainty in current climate models
(Reidmiller et al., 2018). Much of this uncertainty stems from
disagreements between the predicted and observed radiative forcing by
carbonaceous aerosols
(Bond
et al., 2013; Gustafsson and Ramanathan, 2016; Boucher et al., 2016). One of
the most climatically relevant carbonaceous aerosols is black carbon (BC).
Black carbon is widely considered to be a predominate light-absorbing
atmospheric constituent
(Bond
et al., 2013; Bond and Bergstrom, 2006). Despite this, light absorption by
BC is still significantly underestimated in current climate models, which
stems from incorrect parameterization of BC optical properties
(Bond
et al., 2013; Gustafsson and Ramanathan, 2016; Boucher et al., 2016).
Estimation of BC light absorption is particularly complicated, given that BC
is often internally mixed with other species, which manifest as external
coatings (China et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e155">External coatings enhance light absorption by BC through a “lensing
effect”, in which a portion of the incoming light is scattered by the
coating into the BC core, where it is then absorbed
(Chakrabarty
and Heinson, 2018; Cappa et al., 2012; Peng et al., 2016; Saliba et al.,
2016; Liu et al., 2017; Shiraiwa et al., 2010). However, previous studies on
light absorption enhancement due to the lensing effect have had various
results. Some studies find high absorption enhancement (up to a factor of 2.5), while others find little to no absorption enhancement with increasing
coating amount
(Cappa
et al., 2012; Saliba et al., 2016; Shiraiwa et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2015;
Cappa et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2018; Denjean et al., 2020; Zanatta et
al., 2018; Xie et al., 2019; Cui et al., 2016). The range of absorption
enhancement from previous studies is evident in Fig. 1. Fierce  et al. (2020) found that
particle-to-particle heterogeneity reconciles a large portion of the
observed discrepancies in light absorption enhancement (Fierce et
al., 2020). However, even when particle-to-particle heterogeneity is
considered, light absorption enhancement is still overestimated, and
previous discrepancies cannot be fully resolved. Fierce et al. (2020) have also shown
that representation of the complex morphology of BC further improves
estimation of its optical properties, but systematic understanding of the
effect of BC morphology on light absorption enhancement is understudied.</p>
      <p id="d1e158">Here, we take a two-pronged approach to develop a simple yet rigorous
unified framework for parameterizing the effects of particle size,
morphology, and mixing state on BC light absorption. The first approach
involves reducing the aforementioned multivariate space to a single
parameter that captures causal relationships between BC's physiochemical
properties and corresponding light absorption. Using this parameter, we next
develop universal scaling laws for wavelength-dependent BC light absorption
as a function of size, morphology, and mixing state. Previously, one would
need to make assumptions regarding the morphology of BC, then select an
appropriate model to calculate its light absorption properties. Our model is
the first to allow for quick calculation of BC optical properties with any
morphology. We validate these laws against observational datasets from
11 field campaigns which investigated global trends in BC absorption, as
well as laboratory experiments that investigated light absorption
enhancement. From the standpoint of practical applications of our framework,
we package our scaling laws into open-source Python software which allows
researchers to use our results to estimate absorption of BC aerosols based
on their size, morphology, and mixing state, as well as to estimate the
morphology of BC aerosols based on their size, absorption, and mixing state.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e164">Results from previous studies on light absorption enhancement.
Some studies find high absorption enhancement, which have had large
discrepancies. Some studies find that absorption is enhanced by over
twofold, while other studies find little to no absorption enhancement with
increased coating amount
(Cappa
et al., 2012; Denjean et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2015; Cappa et al., 2019;
Shiraiwa et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2018; Cui et al., 2016; Xie et al.,
2019).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14825/2022/acp-22-14825-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Representation of diverse black carbon morphologies</title>
      <p id="d1e188">Black carbon is often modeled assuming a spherical core–shell configuration.
However, soon after emission, BC aggregates have been found to have a lacy,
fractal-like structure. Surface tension and capillary forces from the
buildup of external coatings can cause BC aggregates to collapse and
eventually take on a more spherical structure
(China et al.,
2013; Liu et al., 2017; Fierce et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2017). Recent
studies have found that nonsphericity of BC-containing particles (partial
encapsulation of BC) can decrease absorption enhancement (Hu et
al., 2021, 2022). While these findings are notable, previous studies have
not observed a prevalence of partially encapsulated BC, yet decreased light
absorption enhancement is still observed (China et al.,
2013; Fierce et al., 2020). Therefore, this study is focused on
investigating the effects of core restructuring on light absorption
enhancement, rather than the effects of partial BC encapsulation.</p>
      <p id="d1e191">To model the evolution of BC morphology, we utilize three aggregation models
which represent fresh, partially collapsed, and fully collapsed BC
aggregates. Fresh BC aggregates were created using an off-lattice
diffusion-limited cluster–cluster aggregation model, which has been shown to
accurately represent BC aggregates produced by combustion systems, and have
a fractal dimension (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 1.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09
(Meakin, 1983, 1987). Partially and fully collapsed
BC aggregates were respectively simulated with a percolation model and
simple cubic lattice stacking and have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22 and
3.0. These particles resemble electron microscope images of moderately and
heavily coated BC, respectively (Fierce et al., 2020). Each
simulated BC particle is comprised of monomers with a radius equal to 20 nm
(Bond et
al., 2013). The amount of coating was quantified by the ratio of coating
mass to BC mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Under this definition, increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represents increasing coating amount, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents pure BC.
The masses of the BC core and the coating material were determined per their
volume and densities of 1.8   and 1.2 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively
(Bond and Bergstrom, 2006). This study utilized 345 aggregates,
with BC masses between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 fg, gyration radius between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 nm, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0 and 49. Figure 2
shows examples of simulated aggregates, which represent the range of
observed BC morphology.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e322">The first column shows examples of the 3D structure of <bold>(a)</bold> freshly
emitted, <bold>(c)</bold> partially aged, and <bold>(e)</bold> aged black carbon (BC) particles, which
represent the range of BC morphology observed during atmospheric processing
in field and laboratory studies. The  second column shows internal light
absorption distribution across these aggregates, with light incident from
the left of the particle. As BC becomes more compact, areas of decreased
light absorption begin to emerge in the interior of the aggregate, which in
turn leads to decreased MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14825/2022/acp-22-14825-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Calculation of optical properties</title>
      <p id="d1e357">The optical properties of the generated aggregates were calculated using the
Amsterdam Discrete Dipole Approximation (ADDA 1.3b4) algorithm
(Yurkin and Hoekstra, 2011). The ADDA
algorithm operates by breaking complex shapes into subvolumes
small enough compared to the wavelength of light to be treated as point
scatterers which interact with surrounding point scatterers. It is
recommended that the wavelength of light be at least 10 times the size of
individual subvolumes for accurate calculation of optical
properties. For this study, the wavelength of light was approximately 100
times the size of individual subvolumes in order to reduce errors in
calculation of optical properties. The ADDA algorithm calculated the
absorption cross-section of each aggregate, which was then divided by the
mass of the BC core to give the mass absorption cross-section (MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
each aggregate. Much of the previous work which investigates light
absorption by internally mixed BC measures absorption enhancement
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Absorption enhancement is commonly defined as absorption by
internally mixed BC divided by absorption by pure BC (Fierce et
al., 2020). There are three common methods for estimating light absorption
by pure BC: direct measurement (using thermodenuders to remove coating
material), extrapolation of best-fit lines of light absorption by internally
mixed BC, and using literature values. All of these methods have challenges
which can ultimately affect the reported value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It has been
found that thermodenuders may not remove low-volatility coating material,
which leads to overestimation of light absorption by pure BC and
underestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Shetty et al., 2021). Extrapolation
of absorption measurements by internally mixed BC either assumes that the
morphology of BC does not affect light absorption or that the morphology of
BC remains fixed as coating accumulates. Finally, use of literature values
to approximate light absorption by pure BC assumes that light absorption by
fractal aggregates is equivalent to literature values of absorption by bulk
BC. The Rayleigh–Debye–Gans approximation of light absorption by fractal BC is
significantly lower than commonly used literature values of absorption by
pure BC (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; Sorensen, 2001), indicating
that use of literature values can also underestimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e413">In order to avoid the errors associated with measurement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we
instead focus our efforts on quantification of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Absorption
cross-section per BC mass is a common input of radiative transfer
algorithms and is vital in converting BC mass concentration to absorption
coefficient
(Bond et
al., 2013). Accurate scaling of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of aggregate size,
morphology, and mixing state will allow for subsequent calculation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which accounts for the evolution of BC morphology throughout its
atmospheric lifetime.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Phase shift parameter is a unifying measure of size, morphology, and
composition</title>
      <p id="d1e464">Previous studies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have focused on the effects of a single
dependent variable (absorption) as a function of a single independent
variable (mixing state). However, detailed representation of the
microphysical properties of BC leads to the introduction of several other
measures which describe the size and morphology of BC, increasing the size
of the variable set from two (absorption and mixing state) to four (size,
morphology, absorption, and mixing state).</p>
      <p id="d1e478">To reduce the size of the variable set, we utilize the phase shift parameter
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is a unifying measure of both aggregate size and morphology.
Physically, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> describes the amount of phase shift that light accumulates
when passing through a particle (Heinson and Chakrabarty,
2016; Sorensen and Fischbach, 2000). When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is less than 1, there is not
a significant amount of phase shift in the incident wave, and the
particle–light interactions are well described by Rayleigh approximations.
Conversely, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is greater than 1, the particle–light interactions are
well described by geometric optics (Sorensen and Fischbach, 2000). In
this work, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is used to describe the size and morphology of the BC core,
not the entire particle (BC core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> coating). Therefore, in the remaining
text we refer to the core phase shift parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to distinguish
from the phase shift parameter of the entire particle. The core phase shift
parameter is given by (Debye, 1958)
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M36" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wavelength of incident light, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the particle radius
of gyration (size metric), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the effective complex index of
refraction, which in turn is given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M40" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the BC monomer packing fraction and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the BC complex
refractive index. The BC refractive index is fixed at 1.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.79<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at all
wavelengths (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006). The BC monomer packing
fraction was calculated as the volume of BC which lies within a sphere of
radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (centered at the center of mass) divided by the volume of a
sphere with radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is important to note that all parameters used
in Eqs. (1) and (2) describe the BC core, not the entire particle. It is
also important to note that the dynamic compositional changes which a BC
particle undergoes during atmospheric processing are captured by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (2) (Heinson et al., 2017). As coating
accumulates on the surface of aggregates, the BC core will begin to collapse
due to surface tension and capillary forces, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> will increase. This will
affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and eventually <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The aggregates in this study have
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0.029 and 0.52, representing the range observed in coated
aggregates (Zangmeister et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2018). In
general, for aggregates with an equal size parameter, higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A plot of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> normalized by size parameter can be found in
Supplement  Fig. S1.</p>
      <p id="d1e795">The consequence of increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for light absorption can be seen in
Fig. 2b, d, and f, which show internal fields of the BC aggregates
shown in Fig. 1a, c, and e. For fresh aggregates (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), light is able to fully illuminate the aggregate, and
the entire volume contributes to light absorption. However, for fully
collapsed aggregates (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), light is not able to
illuminate the far interior of the particle, leading to areas of decreased
light absorption. Therefore, if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of a particle significantly
increases, its light absorption properties will change significantly. It
should be noted that since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a function of both the morphology and
size of aggregates, full core collapse will not always lead to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Aggregates with a small number of monomers may never achieve
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, even when the monomer packing fraction reaches
unity.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e895">Average change in MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> per change in coating real
refractive index  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and average change in MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
per change in coating imaginary refractive index
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. We find that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 4 to 16 times greater than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, depending on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These results imply that
the choice of the coating imaginary refractive index is more important than the
choice of the coating real refractive index when calculating MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Error
bars represent 1 standard deviation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14825/2022/acp-22-14825-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Sensitivity of MAC${}_{\mathrm{BC}}$ to coating
refractive index}?><title>Sensitivity of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to coating
refractive index</title>
      <p id="d1e1083">To examine the effects of coating refractive index, we calculate MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
of 30 randomly selected BC aggregates with a coating real refractive index
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 1.45, 1.55, and 1.65 and a coating imaginary refractive index
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 0.00, 0.05, and 0.1. Figure 3 shows the partial derivative
of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and with
respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. We
find that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is always greater than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and increases with increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These
results show that the choice of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is more important than the
choice of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when calculating MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Given this, we further
investigate scaling of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0.00 and 0.05,
but <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained fixed at 1.55 (Bond and Bergstrom,
2006). In the context of field and laboratory measurements, particles with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are representative of BC which is internally mixed with
nonrefractory material, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene secondary organic aerosol and
sulfuric acid (Fierce et al., 2020). Particles with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are representative of BC which is internally mixed with
absorbing material, such as brown carbon
(Liu et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Phase shift parameter controls light absorption</title>
      <p id="d1e1381">Figure 4 shows MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for an
incident wavelength (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 532 nm. Figure 4b, d, and f show the
clear emergence of two regimes separated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dashed line).
For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but is
independent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases
with increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the rate of decrease is dependent on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The finding of decreased light absorption for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
consistent with a recent study which also found decreased MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with
increasing aggregate size (Romshoo et al., 2021). Best-fit lines
for the scaling of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown as solid
lines in Fig. 4 and are summarized by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M118" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.0}{8.0}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex 5.690551pt 0.2ex" class="array" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are constants,  and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the imaginary part of the coating refractive index. The
fitting parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are functions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M126" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> generically represents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2107">The boundary condition for Eq. (3a) is that for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for uncoated  aggregates with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (6.8 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and AAE is the
absorption Ångström exponent for pure BC (1.158). The boundary condition for Eq. (3b) is
that at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> must be equal to MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated using Eq. (3a).</p>
      <p id="d1e2269">The value of all constants used in Eqs. (3) and (4) can be found
in Table 1. Details regarding the acquisition of AAE can be found in
Supplement  Fig. S2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2275">Data and fitting of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for BC internally mixed with a coating imaginary
refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 0.00 <bold>(a–b)</bold>, 0.01 <bold>(c–d)</bold>,
and 0.05 <bold>(e–f)</bold>. We find that for constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
increases with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Additionally, for constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surpasses unity. Solid lines show the
scaling of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> given by Eq. (3).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14825/2022/acp-22-14825-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2408">We find AAE, which is consistent with previously reported values
(Bond et
al., 2013; Romshoo et al., 2021), and fitting parameter B, which is
consistent with a previous numerical study of coated BC aggregates with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chakrabarty and Heinson, 2018). The
value of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is less than commonly used literature values of pure BC
(7.75–8.0 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Bond et
al., 2013; Liu et al., 2020) but slightly greater than the Rayleigh–Debye–Gans
approximation for MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which accounts for the fractal morphology of
BC (5.01 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Sorensen, 2001). Figure 5a shows residual
plots for the fitting of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using Eq. (3). On average, Eq. (3)
overestimates MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 532 nm by 0.47 %, with a standard
deviation of 8.26 %. Generally, relative errors increase as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increases, as shown by Fig. 5b. It should also be noted that for thickly
coated aggregates with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the scaling laws
given in this work overestimate MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for aggregates with large
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and slightly underestimate MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for aggregates with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Underestimation of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
likely due to accumulation of phase shift in the incident light as it passes
through the coating material. This finding indicates that the scaling laws
given by Eq. (3) are valid only when it can be assumed that the phase
shift as light passes through coating materials is negligible.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2613"><bold>(a)</bold> Residual plot of fitting of Eq. (3). On
average, Eq. (3) overestimates MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by 0.47 %, with a standard
deviation of 8.26 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). <bold>(b) </bold>MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated using Eq. (3) as a function of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
ADDA. Equation (3) accurately predicts MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the mixing state and
morphology of the BC aggregates used to develop Eq. (3), but relative
errors increase with increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It should be noted that the outlier
point is a thickly coated aggregate with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, representing the
limitations of the developed framework.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14825/2022/acp-22-14825-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2722">Value of the constants used for the fitting of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Constant</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">95 % CI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.189</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.029</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.674</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.006</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.043</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0007</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.679</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.027</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.066</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.058</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.264</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.010</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.421</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.137</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.440</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.593</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.024</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.418</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.020</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.106</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.131</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.819</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.131</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AAE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.158</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.028</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Wavelength dependency and limitations of core–shell Mie theory</title>
      <p id="d1e3058">Coated BC is conventionally modeled with a core–shell morphology using Mie
theory to calculate its light absorption properties (Bond and
Bergstrom, 2006). Our results indicate that misrepresentation of BC
morphology will inevitably lead to errors in calculation of its light-absorbing properties. To highlight this point, Fig. 6 compares the
accuracy of Eq. (3) in calculating MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 15 randomly selected
aggregates with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 405, 532, 880, and 1200 nm to Mie theory
calculations for mass-equivalent spheres (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Figure 6 shows that across wavelengths, Eq. (3) accurately calculates
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an average error of 9.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.94 %. Figure 6 also shows
that Mie theory is inconsistent in calculating MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for aggregates
with fractal morphologies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Figure 6b shows that Mie
theory overestimates MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at long wavelengths and underestimates
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at shorter wavelengths. These results are consistent with
previous findings that Mie theory overestimates absorption by BC, given that
BC absorption is commonly measured at longer wavelengths to avoid absorption
by organic coatings
(Cappa et al.,
2019; Fierce et al., 2020). We also find that the accuracy of Mie theory
improves significantly as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approaches 3, which is analogous to the
morphology of BC approaching that of a sphere. Conversely, Eq. (3) is
more consistent in calculating MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with any morphology. It should be
noted that the development of Eq. (3) involved only data points for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 532 nm. However, previous work has shown that enhancement of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
is independent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chakrabarty and Heinson, 2018),
indicating that results obtained for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 532 nm are applicable to other
wavelengths. Therefore, Fig. 6c–d also show the utility of Eq. (3)
in calculating MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> across wavelengths.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3235"><bold>(a–b)</bold> MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated using Mie theory (calculated
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and error incurred by using Mie
theory as a function of core fractal dimension (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(c–d)</bold> MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated using Eq. (3) (calculated MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function
of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and error incurred by using Eq. (3) as a function of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>, the shaded region shows the range of errors
(1 standard deviation). The scaling laws given in this work are more
consistent than Mie theory in calculating MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for aggregates with
arbitrary morphology.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14825/2022/acp-22-14825-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Validation of scaling laws with field and laboratory observations</title>
      <p id="d1e3350">Figure 7 shows the scaling of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for aggregates
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, along with data from studies which find significant
increases in MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Yu
et al., 2019; Saliba et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2015; Xie et al., 2019;
Denjean et al., 2020; Zanatta et al., 2018). We find that MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
these studies closely matches the behavior of Eq. (3a), indicating that
these studies were measuring light absorption properties of aggregates with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It has been hypothesized that large values of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
in these studies could be the result of absorbing coatings. However, we find
that the data from these studies closely match scaling of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixed at 0.00. The assumption that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
bolstered by the fact that refractory organics absorb preferentially at
ultraviolet wavelengths
(Chakrabarty
et al., 2010; Sumlin et al., 2018; Kirchstetter et al., 2004; Sengupta et
al., 2018; Shamjad et al., 2018), and we have only included data from
visible and near-infrared wavelengths.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3479">Scaling of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for aggregates with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. 3a, solid lines) compared to the findings of
several other studies which find significant MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Yu
et al., 2019; Saliba et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2015; Xie et al., 2019;
Denjean et al., 2020; Zanatta et al., 2018). We find that measurements from
these studies are well described by Eq. (3a), indicating that the
aggregates measured in these studies had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14825/2022/acp-22-14825-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3550">Previous studies which find little to no increase in
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the corresponding average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
which replicates the measured MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Using Eq. (3b), we are able to
estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of aggregates from studies which find values of
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that are significantly lower than that predicted by Eq. (3a)
(Cappa
et al., 2012; Shiraiwa et al., 2010; Cappa et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2018;
Cui et al., 2016). The error in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 1 standard deviation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wavelength (nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cappa 2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">532</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.38</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cui 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">678</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cappa 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">532</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shiraiwa 2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">532</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.69</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zhang 2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">880</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.31</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3759">Table 2 shows previous studies which find little to no
increase in MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the corresponding
average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which replicates the measured MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The average
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found by solving Eq. (3b), inserting each measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and corresponding MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The importance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the estimation of
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is evident when comparing experimentally measured MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
different studies shown in Table 2. For example, Cappa  et al. (2019) sampled coated
BC aggregates in Fontana and Fresno, California, and find little to no
increase in MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, even with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Cappa et al.,
2019). They postulate that the low value of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is due to unequal
distribution of coating material between BC particles. Separate studies have
shown that uneven distribution of coating can cause decreased MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
but thorough consideration of heterogeneous coating amounts fails to fully
explain low MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in the field (Fierce et al., 2020).
Therefore, our results suggest that elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to core
restructuring may be partially responsible for low MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observed by
Cappa et al. (2019), further highlighting the importance of the diversity of BC
morphology  and mixing state in estimation of its light absorption properties.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Applications of the developed framework</title>
      <p id="d1e3944">The scaling laws given in this work allow experimentalists to carry out two
procedures. The first is the forward procedure, wherein
experimentally measured BC mass, mixing state, and coating refractive index
are combined with assumed BC morphology and MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated. The
second is the inverse procedure, wherein experimentally measured BC mass,
mixing state, and MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are inputs and BC morphology is output.
Further, the inverse and forward procedures can be combined to estimate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We have developed an open-source Python package, called the
“Python BC absorption package” (pyBCabs), which performs the forward and
inverse functions. The following sections provide a brief overview of
pyBCabs, as well as examples of inverse problems and estimation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Further details regarding the functionality of the package, as
well as more examples of forward and inverse problems for single BC
particles and distributions of BC particles, can be found at <uri>https://pybcabs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html</uri>, last access: 28 April 2022.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS1">
  <label>3.5.1</label><title>Forward procedure for light absorption properties</title>
      <p id="d1e3997">In the forward procedure, experimentally measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and single-particle BC masses are first combined with the assumed morphology of BC and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Then, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated using Eqs. (1) and (2) based on
the assumed morphology and BC mass. Finally, MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated using
Eqs. (3a)  or (3b). A flowchart of the forward procedure is shown by the
dashed lines in Fig. 8a. As an example, a fresh BC particle with
mass-equivalent diameter of 300 nm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is input to the
forward procedure along with the wavelength of interest (405 nm), and
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.703</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is output. A BC particle with the same
characteristics of the previous example but with a fully collapsed BC core
would have MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 11.46 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This example demonstrates the
utility of the developed framework in evaluating changes in MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as
coating-induced restructuring occurs during atmospheric processing.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e4135"><bold>(a)</bold> Flowchart for forward (dashed lines) and inverse
(solid lines) procedures of the Python BC absorption module (pyBCabs), which
uses three measured properties: mass absorption cross-section (MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>),
coating amount (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and single-particle BC mass. In the forward
procedure, the assumed BC morphology is combined with the single-particle BC
mass to calculate MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (dashed lines). In the inverse procedure (solid
lines), measurements of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are first input to panel
<bold>(b)</bold> in order to constrain the core phase shift parameter
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Then, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the single-particle BC mass are input to
panel <bold>(c)</bold> to estimate the BC core structure. This procedure has
been carried out for data from three studies, and we find that low MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from these studies can be explained by extensive compaction of the BC core
(Cappa
et al., 2012; Shiraiwa et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2018). The procedure
outlined in panel <bold>(a)</bold> has also been carried out for data from several
studies, which found significant increases in MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and that the core morphology lies between fresh and partially
collapsed BC (Saliba
et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2015; Denjean et al., 2020; Zanatta et al., 2018).
The examples shown here are all calculated assuming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14825/2022/acp-22-14825-2022-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS2">
  <label>3.5.2</label><title>Inverse procedure for morphology retrieval</title>
      <p id="d1e4280">In the inverse procedure, experimentally measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are first input to Eq. (3a), and MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated. If the
calculated MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> replicates the measured MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, then it can be
concluded that the measured BC has <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but the exact
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cannot be determined. If the measured MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is much less than
that predicted by Eq. (3a), then Fig. 8b can be used to estimate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Alternatively, Eq. (3b) can be used to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
directly. Finally, the single-particle BC mass and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are combined
with Fig. 8c to give insight into how much restructuring the BC core has
undergone. A flowchart of the inverse procedure is shown by the solid lines
in Fig. 8a. The inverse procedure has been carried out for seven previous
studies
(Cappa
et al., 2012; Saliba et al., 2016; Shiraiwa et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2015;
Zhang et al., 2018; Denjean et al., 2020; Zanatta et al., 2018), and the
results are shown in Fig. 8c. Our results indicate that studies which
find little to no increase in MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be
measuring BC aggregates which have undergone significant coating-induced
restructuring, leading to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and may also be
measuring particles which have significant heterogeneity in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. On the
other hand, studies that find significant increases in MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> may be
measuring aggregates which have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This does not imply
that these studies are measuring BC which has not been restructured, only that
the product of the size parameter and core packing fraction of BC is not
large enough such that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS3">
  <label>3.5.3</label><title>Inverse procedure for coating refractive index retrieval</title>
      <p id="d1e4496">The inverse and forward procedures can be combined to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
if MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is measured at multiple wavelengths. To accomplish this,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is first found using the inverse procedure outlined above using
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measured at a near-infrared wavelength (where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
estimated as 0.00). Then, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be used to
solve for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at near-ultraviolet and visible wavelengths. This
procedure is outlined in Fig. 9a and has been carried out for the Liu et
al. (2015) study, which measured absorption enhancement for BC which was
internally mixed with absorbing organics (Liu
et al., 2015). We estimate that for this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.056</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 405 nm. Figure 9b shows data collected by Liu  et al. (2015)  at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 781 nm
(red points) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 405 nm (blue points). The solid lines show
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated using Eq. (3), inserting the appropriate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is slightly greater than the
reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Liu et al. (2015).   However, Liu et al. (2015)  approximated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the
Rayleigh–Debye–Gans approximations, not direct measurement
(Liu et al., 2015). Additionally, our
estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistent with previous studies of the
refractive index of absorbing organics
(Chakrabarty
et al., 2010; Sumlin et al., 2018; Kirchstetter et al., 2004; Sengupta et
al., 2018; Shamjad et al., 2018).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e4725"><bold>(a)</bold> Flowchart for estimation of the coating
refractive index. First, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined using the inverse procedure
with MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measured at the near-infrared (near-IR) wavelength, where the
coating imaginary refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be estimated as 0.00.
Then, MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at the near-ultraviolet (near-UV) wavelength and
calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are input to Eq. (3) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated
using the forward procedure. <bold>(b)</bold> Example of coating imaginary
refractive index retrieval for Liu et al. (2015)
(Liu et al., 2015). First, measured MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 781 is used to retrieve BC morphology. We find that the BC in this
study close matches the scaling of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Once
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is known, measured mixing state and MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 405 are
input to Eq. (3a) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is solved for. We estimate that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 405 is approximately 0.056. Data points show
measurements made by Liu et al. (2015),  and solid lines show the result of Eq. (3) with
appropriate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/14825/2022/acp-22-14825-2022-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4949">This study comprehensively investigates the effect of BC morphology on light
absorption, introduces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a central parameter in accurate
estimation of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and develops improved scaling laws for MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
We find that for aggregates with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases
with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For aggregates with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our work also shows that
as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases past unity, MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases. We then provide a
comparison of the scaling laws presented in this work with Mie theory
calculations for mass-equivalent spheres. We find that Mie theory
consistently overestimates MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of internally mixed BC with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is consistent with previous studies which also find
that Mie theory greatly overestimates absorption by BC
(Cappa
et al., 2012, 2019; Fierce et al., 2020). The scaling laws presented in this
work account for the microphysical properties of BC and provide a new tool
for estimating BC light absorption based on BC morphology.</p>
      <p id="d1e5108"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Finally, we validate our findings with data from 11 previous studies which
measure light absorption enhancement
(Yu
et al., 2019; Cappa et al., 2012; Saliba et al., 2016; Shiraiwa et al.,
2010; Liu et al., 2015; Cappa et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2018; Xie et al.,
2019; Denjean et al., 2020; Zanatta et al., 2018; Cui et al., 2016). We find
that studies which find significant absorption enhancement with increasing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> agree well with our scaling laws for BC with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Saliba
et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2015; Denjean et al., 2020; Zanatta et al., 2018;
Xie et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2019). We also find that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a possible explanation for studies which find little to no absorption
enhancement
(Cappa
et al., 2012; Shiraiwa et al., 2010; Cappa et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2018;
Cui et al., 2016). These findings are significant because coating-induced
restructuring of the BC core will lead to increases in the core packing
fraction and consequent increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our findings suggest that
restructuring of the BC core and increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can lead to decreased
absorption and may play a role in previous discrepancies in measured
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Previous work has shown that heterogeneity in BC mixing state
accounts for a large portion of the discrepancies in measured and modeled
BC but does not fully reconcile previous discrepancies in BC absorption.
Our study shows that particle-resolved mixing state and detailed
representation of BC morphology are both necessary in order to fully
parameterize absorption by internally mixed BC.</p>
      <p id="d1e5185">In order to make the results of this study readily available to
experimentalists, we conclude by providing an open-source Python module, the
“Python BC absorption package” (pyBCabs). This package has two
functionalities. The first functionality is for forward problems, wherein BC
mass and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of ambient and laboratory-generated BC are input, and
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is returned. The second functionality is for inverse problems,
wherein BC mass, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of ambient and laboratory-generated
BC are input, and the morphology of BC is returned. The forward and inverse
functionalities can also be combined to estimate the imaginary part of the
coating refractive index if MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is measured at multiple wavelengths.</p>
      <p id="d1e5237">The inverse functionality of this module allows for in situ inference of BC
morphology, as opposed to ex situ methods of determining BC morphology, such
as electron microscopy. Use of the inverse functionality of pyBCabs will
allow for more detailed studies on the evolution of BC morphology during its
atmospheric lifetime. Improved representation of BC morphology, as well as
the improved scaling laws developed by this study, can then be incorporated
into radiative transfer models and eventually aid in reducing the
uncertainty of radiative forcing by carbonaceous aerosols.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5245">All data from ADDA calculations are available
for download at <uri>https://github.com/beelerpayton/ADDA_datasets</uri> (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7255194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7255194</ext-link>, Beeler and Chakrabarty, 2022a). Full details
regarding the functionality of the developed Python package can be found at
<uri>https://pybcabs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html</uri> (last access: 26 October 2022, Beeler and Chakrabarty, 2022b).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e5257">The Supplement includes methods for converting absorption enhancement
from previous field and laboratory studies to a mass absorption cross-section.
It also includes two figures showing examples of a modeled partially collapsed
BC particle (S1) and data used for calculation of the absorption Ångström
exponent (S2). The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14825-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14825-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5266">RKC and PB conceived of the study and its
design. RKC provided guidance and supervision for carrying out the research
tasks and interpretation of results, as well as contributing to the preparation of the
paper. PB performed the data analysis, developed the figures, and led
the preparation of the paper. PB and RKC were involved in the editing
and proofreading of the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5272">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e5278">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5284">This work was supported by the US National Science Foundation
(AGS-1926817), the NASA ACCDAM program (NNH20ZDA001N), and the US Department
of Energy (DE-SC0021011). Funding for collecting data during the 2010 CARES
field campaign in California was provided by the Atmospheric Radiation
Measurement (ARM) Program sponsored by the US Department of Energy (DOE),
Office of Biological and Environmental Research (OBER). The authors thank
William Heinson for insightful comments and assisting with getting this
project off the ground.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e5289">This research has been supported by the US Department of Energy (grant no. DE-SC0021011) and the National Science Foundation (grant no. AGS-1926817).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5295">This paper was edited by Dantong Liu and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beeler, P. and Chakrabarty, R. K.: ADDA_datasets (Version 1.0.0), Computer software, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7255194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7255194</ext-link>, 2022a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beeler, P. and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Online user's guide for the Python Black Carbon Absorption package (pyBCabs),  pyBCabsorption  [code], <uri>https://pybcabs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html</uri>, 2022b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous
Particles: An Investigative Review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40,
27–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500421521</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment: BLACK CARBON IN THE CLIMATE SYSTEM, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 5380–5552, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boucher, O., Balkanski, Y., Hodnebrog, Ø., Myhre, C. L., Myhre, G.,
Quaas, J., Samset, B. H., Schutgens, N., Stier, P., and Wang, R.: Jury is
still out on the radiative forcing by black carbon, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
113, E5092–E5093, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607005113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1607005113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Worsnop, D. R., Bates, T. S.,
Cross, E. S., Davidovits, P., Hakala, J., Hayden, K. L., Jobson, B. T.,
Kolesar, K. R., Lack, D. A., Lerner, B. M., Li, S.-M., Mellon, D., Nuaaman,
I., Olfert, J. S., Petaja, T., Quinn, P. K., Song, C., Subramanian, R.,
Williams, E. J., and Zaveri, R. A.: Radiative Absorption Enhancements Due to
the Mixing State of Atmospheric Black Carbon, Science, 337, 1078–1081,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1223447</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Zhang, X., Russell, L. M., Collier, S., Lee, A. K. Y., Chen,
C.-L., Betha, R., Chen, S., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Sanchez, K. J.,
McMeeking, G. R., Williams, L. R., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Abbatt,
J., and Zhang, Q.: Light Absorption by Ambient Black and Brown Carbon and
its Dependence on Black Carbon Coating State for Two California, USA, Cities
in Winter and Summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1550–1577,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029501</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chakrabarty, R. K. and Heinson, W. R.: Scaling Laws for Light Absorption
Enhancement Due to Nonrefractory Coating of Atmospheric Black Carbon
Aerosol, Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 218701,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.218701" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.218701</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmüller, H., Chen, L.-W. A., Lewis, K., Arnott,
W. P., Mazzoleni, C., Dubey, M. K., Wold, C. E., Hao, W. M., and
Kreidenweis, S. M.: Brown carbon in tar balls from smoldering biomass
combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6363–6370,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Chen, C., Enekwizu, O. Y., Fan, X., Dobrzanski, C. D., Ivanova, E. V., Ma,
Y., Gor, G. Y., and Khalizov, A. F.: Single parameter for predicting the
morphology of atmospheric black carbon, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 52, 14169–14179, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>China, S., Mazzoleni, C., Gorkowski, K., Aiken, A. C., and Dubey, M. K.:
Morphology and mixing state of individual freshly emitted wildfire
carbonaceous particles, Nat. Commun., 4, 2122,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms3122</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cui, X., Wang, X., Yang, L., Chen, B., Chen, J., Andersson, A., and
Gustafsson, Ö.: Radiative absorption enhancement from coatings on black
carbon aerosols, Sci. Total Environ., 551/552, 51–56,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.026</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Debye, P. P.: Light Scattering by Small Particles. HC Van de Hulst. Wiley,
New York, Chapman and Hall, London, 1957, xiii<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, 470 pp., Illus  12,
Science, 127, 477–478, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Denjean, C., Brito, J., Libois, Q., Mallet, M., Bourrianne, T., Burnet, F.,
Dupuy, R., Flamant, C., and Knippertz, P.: Unexpected Biomass Burning
Aerosol Absorption Enhancement Explained by Black Carbon Mixing State,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089055, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL089055</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fierce, L., Onasch, T. B., Cappa, C. D., Mazzoleni, C., China, S., Bhandari,
J., Davidovits, P., Al Fischer, D., Helgestad, T., and Lambe, A. T.:
Radiative absorption enhancements by black carbon controlled by
particle-to-particle heterogeneity in composition, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 5196–5203, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gustafsson, Ö. and Ramanathan, V.: Convergence on climate warming by
black carbon aerosols, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4243–4245,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603570113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1603570113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heinson, W. R. and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Fractal morphology of black carbon
aerosol enhances absorption in the thermal infrared wavelengths, Opt. Lett.,
41, 808–811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.000808" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/OL.41.000808</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Heinson, W. R., Liu, P., and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Fractal scaling of coated
soot aggregates, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 51, 12–19, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, K., Liu, D., Tian, P., Wu, Y., Deng, Z., Wu, Y., Zhao, D., Li, R.,
Sheng, J., and Huang, M.: Measurements of the diversity of shape and mixing
state for ambient black carbon particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
e2021GL094522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094522" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL094522</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, K., Liu, D., Tian, P., Wu, Y., Li, S., Zhao, D., Li, R., Sheng, J.,
Huang, M., and Ding, D.: Identifying the Fraction of Core–Shell Black
Carbon Particles in a Complex Mixture to Constrain the Absorption
Enhancement by Coatings, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 9, 272–279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00060</ext-link>,
2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon: SPECTRAL LIGHT ABSORPTION BY AEROSOLS, J. Geophys. Res., 109,
D21208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004999</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen, D.
V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C., Haslett, S.,
Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T., McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and
Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere
determined by particle mixing state, Nat. Geosci., 10, 184–188,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2901</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Liu, F., Yon, J., Fuentes, A., Lobo, P., Smallwood, G. J., and Corbin, J.
C.: Review of recent literature on the light absorption properties of black
carbon: Refractive index, mass absorption cross section, and absorption
function, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 54, 33–51, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, S., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K., Dubey, M. K., Cappa, C. D., Williams,
L. R., Herndon, S. C., Massoli, P., Fortner, E. C., Chhabra, P. S., Brooks,
W. A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., China, S., Sharma, N.,
Mazzoleni, C., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Lee, J. D.,
Fleming, Z. L., Mohr, C., Zotter, P., Szidat, S., and Prévôt, A. S.
H.: Enhanced light absorption by mixed source black and brown carbon
particles in UK winter, Nat. Commun., 6, 8435,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9435" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms9435</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., Winijkul, E., Yan, F., Chen, Y., Bond, T. C., Feng,
Y., Dubey, M. K., Liu, S., and Pinto, J. P.: Light absorption properties and
radiative effects of primary organic aerosol emissions, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 49, 4868–4877, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Meakin, P.: Formation of Fractal Clusters and Networks by Irreversible
Diffusion-Limited Aggregation, Phys. Rev. Lett., 51, 1119–1122,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1119</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Meakin, P.: Fractal aggregates, Adv. Colloid Interfac.,
28, 249–331, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8686(87)80016-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0001-8686(87)80016-7</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M.,
Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y.-S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C. R., Collins, D.
R., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct
radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1602310113</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reidmiller, D., Avery, C., Easterling, D., Kunkel, K., Lewis, K., Maycock,
T., and Stewart, B.: Fourth national climate assessment, Vol. II, Impacts,
risks, and adaptation in the United States, US Global
Change Research Program,   Washington, DC, USA,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7930/NCA4.2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Romshoo, B., Müller, T., Pfeifer, S., Saturno, J., Nowak, A., Ciupek, K., Quincey, P., and Wiedensohler, A.: Optical properties of coated black carbon aggregates: numerical simulations, radiative forcing estimates, and size-resolved parameterization scheme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12989–13010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12989-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-12989-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saliba, G., Subramanian, R., Saleh, R., Ahern, A. T., Lipsky, E. M.,
Tasoglou, A., Sullivan, R. C., Bhandari, J., Mazzoleni, C., and Robinson, A.
L.: Optical properties of black carbon in cookstove emissions coated with
secondary organic aerosols: Measurements and modeling, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 50, 1264–1276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1225947" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2016.1225947</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sengupta, D., Samburova, V., Bhattarai, C., Kirillova, E., Mazzoleni, L.,
Iaukea-Lum, M., Watts, A., Moosmüller, H., and Khlystov, A.: Light
absorption by polar and non-polar aerosol compounds from laboratory biomass
combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10849–10867,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10849-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-10849-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Shamjad, P., Satish, R., Thamban, N. M., Rastogi, N., and Tripathi, S.:
Absorbing refractive index and direct radiative forcing of atmospheric brown
carbon over Gangetic Plain, Acs Earth  Space Chem., 2, 31–37, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Shetty, N., Beeler, P., Paik, T., Brechtel, F. J., and Chakrabarty, R. K.:
Bias in quantification of light absorption enhancement of black carbon
aerosol coated with low-volatility brown carbon, Aerosol Science and
Technology, 55, 539–551, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Kondo, Y., Iwamoto, T., and Kita, K.: Amplification of Light
Absorption of Black Carbon by Organic Coating, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 44, 46–54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903357686" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820903357686</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sorensen, C. and Fischbach, D.: Patterns in Mie scattering, Opt.
Commun., 173, 145–153, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sorensen, C. M.: Light Scattering by Fractal Aggregates: A Review, Aerosol
Sci. Technol., 40, 648–687, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sumlin, B. J., Heinson, Y. W., Shetty, N., Pandey, A., Pattison, R. S.,
Baker, S., Hao, W. M., and Chakrabarty, R. K.: UV–Vis–IR spectral complex
refractive indices and optical properties of brown carbon aerosol from
biomass burning, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 206, 392–398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.009</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Liu, F., He, C., Bi, L., Cheng, T., Wang, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang,
X., Shi, Z., and Li, W.: Fractal Dimensions and Mixing Structures of Soot
Particles during Atmospheric Processing, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 4,
487–493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00418" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00418</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, C., Xu, W., Wang, J., Liu, D., Ge, X., Zhang, Q., Wang, Q., Du, W.,
Zhao, J., Zhou, W., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D., and Sun, Y.:
Light absorption enhancement of black carbon in urban Beijing in summer,
Atmospheric Environment, Atmos. Environ., 213, 499–504,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.041." ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.041.</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, P., Toon, O. B., Bardeen, C. G., Zhu, Y., Rosenlof, K. H., Portmann, R.
W., Thornberry, T. D., Gao, R.-S., Davis, S. M., Wolf, E. T., de Gouw, J.,
Peterson, D. A., Fromm, M. D., and Robock, A.: Black carbon lofts wildfire
smoke high into the stratosphere to form a persistent plume, Science, 365,
587–590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1748" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aax1748</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yurkin, M. A. and Hoekstra, A. G.: The discrete-dipole-approximation code
ADDA: Capabilities and known limitations, J. Quant.
Spectrosc. Ra., 112, 2234–2247,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.01.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.01.031</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zanatta, M., Laj, P., Gysel, M., Baltensperger, U., Vratolis, S.,
Eleftheriadis, K., Kondo, Y., Dubuisson, P., Winiarek, V., Kazadzis, S.,
Tunved, P., and Jacobi, H.-W.: Effects of mixing state on optical and
radiative properties of black carbon in the European Arctic, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 18, 14037–14057, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14037-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14037-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zangmeister, C. D., Radney, J. G., Dockery, L. T., Young, J. T., Ma, X.,
You, R., and Zachariah, M. R.: Packing density of rigid aggregates is
independent of scale, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
9037–9041, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Favez, O., Canonaco, F., Liu, D., Močnik, G., Amodeo, T.,
Sciare, J., Prévôt, A. S. H., Gros, V., and Albinet, A.: Evidence of
major secondary organic aerosol contribution to lensing effect black carbon
absorption enhancement, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, 47,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0056-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-018-0056-2</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Constraining the particle-scale diversity of black carbon light absorption using a unified framework</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Beeler, P. and Chakrabarty, R. K.: ADDA_datasets (Version 1.0.0), Computer software, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7255194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7255194</a>, 2022a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Beeler, P. and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Online user's guide for the Python Black Carbon Absorption package (pyBCabs),  pyBCabsorption  [code], <a href="https://pybcabs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html" target="_blank"/>, 2022b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous
Particles: An Investigative Review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40,
27–67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment: BLACK CARBON IN THE CLIMATE SYSTEM, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 5380–5552, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Balkanski, Y., Hodnebrog, Ø., Myhre, C. L., Myhre, G.,
Quaas, J., Samset, B. H., Schutgens, N., Stier, P., and Wang, R.: Jury is
still out on the radiative forcing by black carbon, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
113, E5092–E5093, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607005113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607005113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Worsnop, D. R., Bates, T. S.,
Cross, E. S., Davidovits, P., Hakala, J., Hayden, K. L., Jobson, B. T.,
Kolesar, K. R., Lack, D. A., Lerner, B. M., Li, S.-M., Mellon, D., Nuaaman,
I., Olfert, J. S., Petaja, T., Quinn, P. K., Song, C., Subramanian, R.,
Williams, E. J., and Zaveri, R. A.: Radiative Absorption Enhancements Due to
the Mixing State of Atmospheric Black Carbon, Science, 337, 1078–1081,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Cappa, C. D., Zhang, X., Russell, L. M., Collier, S., Lee, A. K. Y., Chen,
C.-L., Betha, R., Chen, S., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Sanchez, K. J.,
McMeeking, G. R., Williams, L. R., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Abbatt,
J., and Zhang, Q.: Light Absorption by Ambient Black and Brown Carbon and
its Dependence on Black Carbon Coating State for Two California, USA, Cities
in Winter and Summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1550–1577,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029501" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029501</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chakrabarty, R. K. and Heinson, W. R.: Scaling Laws for Light Absorption
Enhancement Due to Nonrefractory Coating of Atmospheric Black Carbon
Aerosol, Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 218701,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.218701" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.218701</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmüller, H., Chen, L.-W. A., Lewis, K., Arnott,
W. P., Mazzoleni, C., Dubey, M. K., Wold, C. E., Hao, W. M., and
Kreidenweis, S. M.: Brown carbon in tar balls from smoldering biomass
combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6363–6370,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C., Enekwizu, O. Y., Fan, X., Dobrzanski, C. D., Ivanova, E. V., Ma,
Y., Gor, G. Y., and Khalizov, A. F.: Single parameter for predicting the
morphology of atmospheric black carbon, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 52, 14169–14179, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
China, S., Mazzoleni, C., Gorkowski, K., Aiken, A. C., and Dubey, M. K.:
Morphology and mixing state of individual freshly emitted wildfire
carbonaceous particles, Nat. Commun., 4, 2122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Cui, X., Wang, X., Yang, L., Chen, B., Chen, J., Andersson, A., and
Gustafsson, Ö.: Radiative absorption enhancement from coatings on black
carbon aerosols, Sci. Total Environ., 551/552, 51–56,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.026</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Debye, P. P.: Light Scattering by Small Particles. HC Van de Hulst. Wiley,
New York, Chapman and Hall, London, 1957, xiii+, 470 pp., Illus  12,
Science, 127, 477–478, 1958.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Denjean, C., Brito, J., Libois, Q., Mallet, M., Bourrianne, T., Burnet, F.,
Dupuy, R., Flamant, C., and Knippertz, P.: Unexpected Biomass Burning
Aerosol Absorption Enhancement Explained by Black Carbon Mixing State,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089055, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089055</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Fierce, L., Onasch, T. B., Cappa, C. D., Mazzoleni, C., China, S., Bhandari,
J., Davidovits, P., Al Fischer, D., Helgestad, T., and Lambe, A. T.:
Radiative absorption enhancements by black carbon controlled by
particle-to-particle heterogeneity in composition, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 5196–5203, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Gustafsson, Ö. and Ramanathan, V.: Convergence on climate warming by
black carbon aerosols, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4243–4245,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603570113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603570113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Heinson, W. R. and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Fractal morphology of black carbon
aerosol enhances absorption in the thermal infrared wavelengths, Opt. Lett.,
41, 808–811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.000808" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.000808</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Heinson, W. R., Liu, P., and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Fractal scaling of coated
soot aggregates, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 51, 12–19, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, K., Liu, D., Tian, P., Wu, Y., Deng, Z., Wu, Y., Zhao, D., Li, R.,
Sheng, J., and Huang, M.: Measurements of the diversity of shape and mixing
state for ambient black carbon particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
e2021GL094522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094522" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094522</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, K., Liu, D., Tian, P., Wu, Y., Li, S., Zhao, D., Li, R., Sheng, J.,
Huang, M., and Ding, D.: Identifying the Fraction of Core–Shell Black
Carbon Particles in a Complex Mixture to Constrain the Absorption
Enhancement by Coatings, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 9, 272–279, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00060</a>,
2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon: SPECTRAL LIGHT ABSORPTION BY AEROSOLS, J. Geophys. Res., 109,
D21208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004999" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004999</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen, D.
V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C., Haslett, S.,
Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T., McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and
Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere
determined by particle mixing state, Nat. Geosci., 10, 184–188,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, F., Yon, J., Fuentes, A., Lobo, P., Smallwood, G. J., and Corbin, J.
C.: Review of recent literature on the light absorption properties of black
carbon: Refractive index, mass absorption cross section, and absorption
function, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 54, 33–51, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, S., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K., Dubey, M. K., Cappa, C. D., Williams,
L. R., Herndon, S. C., Massoli, P., Fortner, E. C., Chhabra, P. S., Brooks,
W. A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., China, S., Sharma, N.,
Mazzoleni, C., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Lee, J. D.,
Fleming, Z. L., Mohr, C., Zotter, P., Szidat, S., and Prévôt, A. S.
H.: Enhanced light absorption by mixed source black and brown carbon
particles in UK winter, Nat. Commun., 6, 8435,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9435" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9435</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., Winijkul, E., Yan, F., Chen, Y., Bond, T. C., Feng,
Y., Dubey, M. K., Liu, S., and Pinto, J. P.: Light absorption properties and
radiative effects of primary organic aerosol emissions, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 49, 4868–4877, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Meakin, P.: Formation of Fractal Clusters and Networks by Irreversible
Diffusion-Limited Aggregation, Phys. Rev. Lett., 51, 1119–1122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1119" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1119</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Meakin, P.: Fractal aggregates, Adv. Colloid Interfac.,
28, 249–331, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8686(87)80016-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8686(87)80016-7</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M.,
Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y.-S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C. R., Collins, D.
R., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct
radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Reidmiller, D., Avery, C., Easterling, D., Kunkel, K., Lewis, K., Maycock,
T., and Stewart, B.: Fourth national climate assessment, Vol. II, Impacts,
risks, and adaptation in the United States, US Global
Change Research Program,   Washington, DC, USA,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Romshoo, B., Müller, T., Pfeifer, S., Saturno, J., Nowak, A., Ciupek, K., Quincey, P., and Wiedensohler, A.: Optical properties of coated black carbon aggregates: numerical simulations, radiative forcing estimates, and size-resolved parameterization scheme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12989–13010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12989-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12989-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Saliba, G., Subramanian, R., Saleh, R., Ahern, A. T., Lipsky, E. M.,
Tasoglou, A., Sullivan, R. C., Bhandari, J., Mazzoleni, C., and Robinson, A.
L.: Optical properties of black carbon in cookstove emissions coated with
secondary organic aerosols: Measurements and modeling, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 50, 1264–1276, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1225947" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1225947</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Sengupta, D., Samburova, V., Bhattarai, C., Kirillova, E., Mazzoleni, L.,
Iaukea-Lum, M., Watts, A., Moosmüller, H., and Khlystov, A.: Light
absorption by polar and non-polar aerosol compounds from laboratory biomass
combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10849–10867,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10849-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10849-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Shamjad, P., Satish, R., Thamban, N. M., Rastogi, N., and Tripathi, S.:
Absorbing refractive index and direct radiative forcing of atmospheric brown
carbon over Gangetic Plain, Acs Earth  Space Chem., 2, 31–37, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Shetty, N., Beeler, P., Paik, T., Brechtel, F. J., and Chakrabarty, R. K.:
Bias in quantification of light absorption enhancement of black carbon
aerosol coated with low-volatility brown carbon, Aerosol Science and
Technology, 55, 539–551, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Kondo, Y., Iwamoto, T., and Kita, K.: Amplification of Light
Absorption of Black Carbon by Organic Coating, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 44, 46–54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903357686" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903357686</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Sorensen, C. and Fischbach, D.: Patterns in Mie scattering, Opt.
Commun., 173, 145–153, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Sorensen, C. M.: Light Scattering by Fractal Aggregates: A Review, Aerosol
Sci. Technol., 40, 648–687, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Sumlin, B. J., Heinson, Y. W., Shetty, N., Pandey, A., Pattison, R. S.,
Baker, S., Hao, W. M., and Chakrabarty, R. K.: UV–Vis–IR spectral complex
refractive indices and optical properties of brown carbon aerosol from
biomass burning, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 206, 392–398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.009</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Liu, F., He, C., Bi, L., Cheng, T., Wang, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang,
X., Shi, Z., and Li, W.: Fractal Dimensions and Mixing Structures of Soot
Particles during Atmospheric Processing, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 4,
487–493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00418" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00418</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, C., Xu, W., Wang, J., Liu, D., Ge, X., Zhang, Q., Wang, Q., Du, W.,
Zhao, J., Zhou, W., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D., and Sun, Y.:
Light absorption enhancement of black carbon in urban Beijing in summer,
Atmospheric Environment, Atmos. Environ., 213, 499–504,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.041." target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.041.</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, P., Toon, O. B., Bardeen, C. G., Zhu, Y., Rosenlof, K. H., Portmann, R.
W., Thornberry, T. D., Gao, R.-S., Davis, S. M., Wolf, E. T., de Gouw, J.,
Peterson, D. A., Fromm, M. D., and Robock, A.: Black carbon lofts wildfire
smoke high into the stratosphere to form a persistent plume, Science, 365,
587–590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1748" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1748</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Yurkin, M. A. and Hoekstra, A. G.: The discrete-dipole-approximation code
ADDA: Capabilities and known limitations, J. Quant.
Spectrosc. Ra., 112, 2234–2247,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.01.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.01.031</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Zanatta, M., Laj, P., Gysel, M., Baltensperger, U., Vratolis, S.,
Eleftheriadis, K., Kondo, Y., Dubuisson, P., Winiarek, V., Kazadzis, S.,
Tunved, P., and Jacobi, H.-W.: Effects of mixing state on optical and
radiative properties of black carbon in the European Arctic, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 18, 14037–14057, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14037-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14037-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Zangmeister, C. D., Radney, J. G., Dockery, L. T., Young, J. T., Ma, X.,
You, R., and Zachariah, M. R.: Packing density of rigid aggregates is
independent of scale, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
9037–9041, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Favez, O., Canonaco, F., Liu, D., Močnik, G., Amodeo, T.,
Sciare, J., Prévôt, A. S. H., Gros, V., and Albinet, A.: Evidence of
major secondary organic aerosol contribution to lensing effect black carbon
absorption enhancement, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, 47,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0056-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0056-2</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
