<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-13449-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Hygroscopicity and CCN potential of <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> DMS-derived aerosol particles</article-title><alt-title>Hygroscopicity and CCN potential of DMS-derived aerosol particles</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Hygroscopicity and CCN potential of DMS-derived aerosol particles}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B.~Rosati et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Rosati</surname><given-names>Bernadette</given-names></name>
          <email>bernadette.rosati@chem.au.dk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4930-3638</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Isokääntä</surname><given-names>Sini</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6307-7206</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Christiansen</surname><given-names>Sigurd</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6416-2522</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>Mads Mørk</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff6">
          <name><surname>Moosakutty</surname><given-names>Shamjad P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff7">
          <name><surname>Wollesen de Jonge</surname><given-names>Robin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Massling</surname><given-names>Andreas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Glasius</surname><given-names>Marianne</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4404-6989</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Elm</surname><given-names>Jonas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3736-4329</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Virtanen</surname><given-names>Annele</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bilde</surname><given-names>Merete</given-names></name>
          <email>bilde@chem.au.dk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2112-514X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland,  Kuopio, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Faroe Islands,  Tórshavn, Faroe Islands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Qatar Environment and Energy Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Division of Nuclear Physics, Lund University,  Lund, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Bernadette Rosati (bernadette.rosati@chem.au.dk) and Merete Bilde (bilde@chem.au.dk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>October</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>20</issue>
      <fpage>13449</fpage><lpage>13466</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>8</day><month>March</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>29</day><month>March</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>September</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>September</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e228">Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is emitted by phytoplankton species in the oceans and constitutes the largest source of naturally emitted sulfur to the atmosphere. The climate impact of secondary particles, formed through the oxidation of DMS by hydroxyl radicals, is still elusive. This study investigates the hygroscopicity and cloud condensation nuclei activity of such particles and discusses the results in relation to their chemical composition. We show that mean hygroscopicity parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, during an experiment for particles of 80 nm in diameter range from 0.46 to 0.52 or higher, as measured at both sub- and supersaturated water vapour conditions. Ageing of the particles leads to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from, for example, 0.50 to 0.58 over the course of 3 h (Exp. 7). Aerosol mass spectrometer measurements from this study indicate that this change most probably stems from a change in chemical composition leading to slightly higher fractions of ammonium sulfate compared to methanesulfonic acid (MSA) within the particles with ageing time. Lowering the temperature to 258 K increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> slightly, particularly for small particles. These <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are well comparable to previously reported model values for MSA or mixtures between MSA and ammonium sulfate. Particle nucleation and growth rates suggest a clear temperature dependence, with slower rates at cold temperatures. Quantum chemical calculations show that gas-phase MSA clusters are predominantly not hydrated, even at high humidity conditions, indicating that their gas-phase chemistry should be independent of relative humidity.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e268">Aerosols originating from marine environments have a large impact on climate and are present over large parts of the Earth, as oceans cover more than 70 % of the Earth's surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.1"/>. Marine aerosols affect climate not only by scattering and absorbing solar radiation but also by acting as cloud condensation nuclei, CCN (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="altparen.2"/>). Marine aerosols consist of primary particles – mostly sea salt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.3"/> – with various organic compounds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx66" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and secondary particles comprising non-sea-salt sulfate originating from dimethyl sulfide (DMS) oxidation. DMS is emitted to the atmosphere due to the decomposition of dimethylsulfoniopropionate, which, in turn, is produced by phytoplankton in the oceans <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.5"/>. In addition, exposure of corals to air has also been found to result in emission of significant amounts of DMS into the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.6"/>. DMS is considered as one of the most abundant natural sulfur compounds in the atmosphere (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="altparen.7"/>), and the global flux to the atmosphere is estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> TgS each year <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.8"/>. In the atmosphere, DMS reacts primarily with hydroxyl radicals (OH) by either addition or hydrogen abstraction, where the relative importance of these two pathways has been shown to be sensitive to the prevalent temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.9"/>. This reaction finally leads to compounds such as sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SA) and methanesulfonic acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MSA), often found in the particle phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.10"/>, as well as hydroperoxymethyl thioformate (HOOCH<sub>2</sub>SCHO, HPMTF) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91 bib1.bibx94" id="paren.11"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e355">Research on the importance of DMS for climate was stimulated by the so-called CLAW hypothesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.12"/>. The CLAW hypothesis proposes that higher ambient temperatures may increase the DMS production, which, in turn, could enhance the formation of sulfate aerosols capable of acting as CCN. Subsequently, this could lead to changes in cloud micro-physical properties, coverage, and lifetime and, therefore, the cooling of the atmosphere. Although this hypothesis has been widely disputed, it has resulted in substantial progress in understanding the role of DMS oxidation products in the marine atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.13"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e366"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.14"/> investigated the multi-phase chemistry of DMS by means of advanced box models and presented a new parameterisation to include important aqueous-phase chemical processes. They showed that the atmospheric conversion of DMS into MSA is highly underestimated if the aqueous-phase chemistry of DMS is not considered. Their revised set of oxidation mechanisms was essential to explain MSA ratios found in atmospheric aerosols. Recently, the secondary aerosol formation from DMS oxidation by hydroxyl radicals was studied in smog chamber experiments accompanied by kinetic multi-layer modelling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx93" id="paren.15"/>. It was observed that the secondary aerosol particle mass production from DMS oxidation was lower in experiments at humid conditions (relative humidity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) compared to dry ones (relative humidity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) for otherwise similar conditions of temperature, DMS, and oxidant levels. In both cases the formed aerosol particles were found to consist mostly of MSA. Modelling and experimental data could be reconciled by including the newest parameterisations for DMS oxidation, extended by revised and complete multi-phase DMS oxidation mechanisms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.16"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e397">Despite the significant contribution of DMS to atmospheric aerosols, knowledge about key properties – especially concerning the hygroscopicity and CCN activity of DMS-derived aerosols – is sparse. Hygroscopicity, which describes the ability of a particle to take up water at subsaturated water vapour conditions, is one key aspect of the climatic effects of aerosols, and it is predominately determined by the chemical composition of the particles. The CCN activity describes the potential of aerosol particles to be activated into cloud droplets at supersaturated water vapour conditions, and it is known to depend on particle size and chemical composition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.17"/>. The hygroscopicity (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx83 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx26" id="altparen.18"/>) and  ability to serve as CCN (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx75" id="altparen.19"/>) of marine aerosols and, in particular, sea spray aerosols have been studied intensively. Few studies have addressed the water uptake behaviour of secondary DMS-derived aerosols. Methanesulfonate (MSA) particles were scrutinised in a few studies: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.20"/> reported experimentally derived hygroscopic growth factors (GF) for MSA at high humidity conditions, obtaining GF (90 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.57 for particles with a dry diameter of 100 nm; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="text.21"/> investigated various particulate methanesulfonates and obtained hygroscopicity parameters in the range of 0.37–0.47 based on CCN activity measurements (diameter: 40–60 nm), finding calcium methanesulfonate as the least and potassium and sodium methanesulfonate as the most hygroscopic compounds. The water cycle of sodium methanesulfonate, among others, has also been studied with an electrodynamic balance, finding that particles deliquesce (i.e. dissolve completely) at RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 65.2 %–68.9 % and exhibit a GF (90 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.80 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.22"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.23"/> included the methanesulfonate anion to the list of ions considered in the Aerosol Inorganic–Organic Mixtures Functional groups Activity Coefficients (AIOMFAC) model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx99" id="paren.24"/> to predict the CCN activity of methanesulfonate particles, including MSA, sodium, and ammonium methanesulfonate. Their calculations suggest that MSA and sodium methanesulfonate activate at similar critical supersaturations, while higher supersaturations are needed to activate ammonium methanesulfonate particles of the same size.</p>
      <p id="d1e447">To our knowledge, the hygroscopicity and CCN activity of complex aerosols formed in the oxidation of DMS have not been addressed before. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate comprehensively the hygroscopic growth and CCN activity of DMS-derived aerosols generated in an atmospheric simulation chamber and to discuss these properties in relation to the chemical composition of the aerosols. Additionally, we show the results of nucleation and the growth rates of new particles formed through the oxidation of DMS with OH radicals. The experiments were designed to mimic a realistic marine atmosphere by simulating different relevant humidity and temperature conditions. For completeness, we also include in this work results from five experiments already presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.25"/> and/or <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.26"/> but not previously discussed with respect to hygroscopicity and CCN activation potential. Our extensive measurement setup covers the formation rates of particles larger than 1.7 nm, the growth rates of 10–20 nm particles, and the water uptake of particles from 10–150 nm (dry size) and  provides insight into the bulk chemical composition of the DMS-derived aerosols. Experiments were additionally complemented by quantum chemical modelling of MSA clusters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Theory</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>Nucleation rate calculations</title>
      <p id="d1e478">Particle nucleation rates were obtained using the method described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.27"/>. By measuring the concentration of particles with diameters exceeding a cut-off diameter of 1.7 nm (N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), the nucleation rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M15" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the rate of particle wall loss and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the time after the initiation of new particle formation. The cut-off diameter of 1.7 nm was selected according to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.28"/>,
being described as the critical cluster size from where nucleation occurs; thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> constitutes an approximation of the nucleation rate. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was obtained from the wall-loss-corrected particle number concentrations, calculating the gradient between 20 % and 80 % of the maximum particle number concentration.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>Water uptake by atmospheric aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e608">The water uptake behaviour of aerosol particles at sub- and supersaturated conditions can be described by the Köhler equation:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M20" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the water vapour saturation ratio, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the water activity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the surface tension of the solution, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the ideal gas constant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the absolute temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the density of water, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the molecular mass of water, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH) the diameter of a particle exposed to a certain relative humidity, RH.</p>
      <p id="d1e739">At sub-saturated conditions of water vapour, the hygroscopic growth factor at a given relative humidity (GF(RH) is calculated as the ratio of the particle diameter at high RH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH)) to the dry particle diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M31" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GF(RH)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e788">At supersaturated conditions of water vapour, the critical supersaturation (SS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>crit</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) needed for a specific particle size to be activated into a cloud droplet is in focus. This point is identified as the maximum of the Köhler curve (SS versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH)).</p>
      <p id="d1e807">To compare water uptake at sub- and supersaturated conditions, the hygroscopicity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, introduced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.29"/>, can be used. The water activity term in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) can then be described in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the following way:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M36" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of the dry particle and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the volume of the water in the droplet. By combining Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>), the semi-empirical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler equation can be obtained:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M40" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>GF(RH)</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>GF(RH)</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e986">For a given supersaturation (or RH for the subsaturated case), a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>GF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be calculated.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Experimental procedure</title>
      <p id="d1e1024">Experiments were carried out at the Aarhus University Research on Aerosol (AURA) atmospheric simulation chamber <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.30"/>. In short, the facility consists of a 5 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Teflon bag situated inside a temperature-controlled room, allowing experiments to be performed in the temperature range of 257–299 K. The chamber is equipped with 24 UV lamps (wavelengths: 300–400 nm) located at the top and bottom of the bag. In high humidity experiments, a custom-built humidifier was used to increase the relative humidity in the chamber to RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 %. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (30 % in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Merck, 1.07209.0250) was evaporated from a heated round-bottom flask (at 403 K) and flushed into the chamber using heated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (333–343 K, 10 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). By photolysing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, OH radicals were produced. The OH radical concentrations in the experiments are estimated to be in the range of typical tropospheric concentrations (4.64–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="altparen.31"/>) based on supplementary experiments investigating the decay of 1-butanol in the bag <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx93" id="paren.32"/>. Either 200 or 400 ppb of DMS (Sigma Aldrich, anhydrous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, 274380) were injected into the chamber by evaporating a known amount and guiding it into the chamber using 10 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gas heated to 333 K.  The sequential order of the procedure was: (1) setting the desired chamber temperature, (2) filling the chamber with purified air (active carbon, HEPA filter, and zero-air generator (Aadco Model 737-14)), (3) injecting humidified air to reach the desired RH, (4) injecting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, (5) switching the UV lights on, and (6) injecting DMS. The injection of DMS denotes the “time-0” in the experiments. Ammonia concentrations during the experiments are estimated to be between 1–10 ppb based on data from Tange (56.352222<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 9.5875<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km from Aarhus; <uri>http://ebas.nilu.no/</uri>, last access: 17 May 2022). Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> presents an overview of the experimental conditions. All instruments were operated at the laboratory temperature of 22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C outside the AURA chamber. To limit evaporation in tubing en route to the particle size (SMPS) and chemical composition measurement (AMS), the tubing was insulated. Particle size distributions and chemical composition for Exp. 5 and 9 were already presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.33"/>. This work focuses on the water uptake of the studied aerosol particles; thus, Exp. 1, 5, 6, 7, and 9 are presented in terms of the hygroscopicity and CCN activity, which were not addressed in any of the previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx93" id="paren.34"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1251">Experimental conditions. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ch</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ch</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  denote the mean measured temperature and RH together with their standard deviations (1 SD) in the chamber. The DMS concentrations indicate the measured concentrations after injection, except in Exp. 3, 6, and 7 – marked with an asterisk – where theoretical values are given based on the liquid injected into the chamber, as the PTR-ToF-MS was not available. Additionally, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration ranges, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios, and particle growth rates (GR) obtained for the size range 10–20 nm are listed. Lower H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios correspond to injections of 418 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L, while higher ones correspond to injections of 1500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L. See also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.35"/> for additional information regarding Exp. 1, 6, and 7 and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.36"/> for experiments 5 and 9. The last column specifies if any data of these experiments were previously presented.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Exp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ch</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ch</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">DMS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">number</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(ppm)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13 February 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">292.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">120</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–11.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">65.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">See also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.37"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15 February 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">63.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">292.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">150</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">65.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">24.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 March 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">292.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">200<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">235.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">20.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22 February 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">58.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">292.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">310</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">65.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">20.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26 February 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">56.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">292.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">330</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">235.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">26.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">See also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.38"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4 March 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">292.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">400<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–9.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">235.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">See also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.39"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7 March 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">292.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">400<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–20.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">235.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">See also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.40"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18 February 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">73.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">273.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">170</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">61.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1 March 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">273.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">220</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">219.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">See also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.41"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20 February 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">70.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">259.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">120</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">57.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28 February 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">258.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">280</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">207.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1342"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Mixing ratios calculated assuming a smog chamber volume of 5 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a density of the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> solution (30 % in H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) of 1.11 g mL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Instrumentation and analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Stationary instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d1e2169">Nitrogen oxides (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) levels were continuously measured with a chemiluminescent monitor (AC32M, Environnement SA) and a UV absorption ozone analyser (O342 Module, Environment S.A), respectively. The temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and RH were monitored in the centre of the bag (HC02-04 sensor; Rotronic AG, Switzerland).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Volatile organic compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e2207">During Exp. 1, 2, 4, 5, and 8–11, a proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS 4000, Ionicon Analytik, Innsbruck, Austria; e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx79" id="altparen.42"/>) was employed to continuously monitor DMS concentrations. The instrument is based on a soft-ionisation technique using hydronium ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to ionise gas-phase compounds with proton affinities equal to or greater than that of water, which is the case for most volatile organic compounds (VOC). After the reaction with the primary ion occurs in the drift tube, the ionised compounds are detected in the ToF-MS. The PTR-ToF-MS was run with drift tube conditions of 650 V, 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and 2.4 mbar and, thus, an E/N number of 143 Townsend. The instrument was connected to the chamber via a 2 m long Teflon tube, wrapped in heating tape set to 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, that was connected to the heated inlet of the instrument (temperature set to 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). Additionally, the instrument flow rate was increased by adding a sheath flow of 200 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to reduce sampling losses.</p>
      <p id="d1e2269">Data analysis was performed using the PTR-MS Viewer 3 (IONICON). Prior to the measurement campaign, a transmission calibration was carried out based on specific reaction rate constants and mass discrimination factors, as described elsewhere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.43"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>2.3.3</label><title>Particle number concentration</title>
      <p id="d1e2283">An Airmodus A11 nano Condensation Nucleus Counter (nCNC, Airmodus), consisting of a particle size magnifier (PSM, Airmodus A10) and a condensation particle counter (CPC, Airmodus A20), was used to measure particles above 1.7 nm in diameter during Exp. 5, 9, and 11. A thorough description of the instrument is given elsewhere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.44"/>. In short, the PSM was operated with diethylene glycol as working fluid. Supersaturated diethylene glycol leads to growth of the smallest (approximately 1 nm) particles by condensing the working fluid onto them. When the particles reach sizes of approximately 90 nm, they are guided to a condensation particle counter (using butanol as working fluid) and optically detected therein. The PSM was operated in fixed mode, counting all particles above the selected 1.7 nm threshold. The saturator flow rate was kept at 0.28 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in order to obtain the desired cut-off diameter.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4">
  <label>2.3.4</label><title>Particle size distributions</title>
      <p id="d1e2309">A scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS, TSI model 3938) was used to measure the dry particle number size distributions. The electrostatic classifier (EC, TSI model 3082) was either connected to a nano differential mobility analyser (DMA; TSI model 3085A) for sizes between 2 and 65 nm or a long DMA (TSI model 3081) for the size range 10–422 nm. Initially, the nano DMA was used and switched to the long DMA when particles grew out of the size range. The DMAs were connected to a nano water-based condensation particle counter (WCPC, TSI model 3788). The SMPS data analysis was performed with the Aerosol Instrument Manager (AIM) version 10.2.0.11, using the corrections for diffusion losses and multiple charges. A sheath to aerosol flow ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was chosen (nano SMPS: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; long SMPS: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). A silica gel diffusion dryer was used to ensure a RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % at the inlet of the SMPS.</p>
      <p id="d1e2380">In order to retrieve particle properties, such as hygroscopicity, representative for the main particle mode, we used the size distributions measured with SMPS over time. A log-normal distribution was fitted to the SMPS data at every time step. The mean and standard deviation of the particle number size distribution were retrieved from the fit. A particle size was classified as representative for the major particle population in the chamber when it was within the fitted mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SD of the SMPS size distribution. All mean values presented in the manuscript refer to the time when particle properties were measured within the main growth mode. An example for the limits found for Exp. 5 is shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS5">
  <label>2.3.5</label><title>Water uptake at sub- and supersaturated conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e2402">The hygroscopic growth of 10–150 nm (dry size) particles was measured with two separate humidified tandem differential mobility analysers (HTDMAs) at a constant RH of 80 %. In brief, an HTDMA consists of two DMAs, a CPC, and a humidifier in between the two DMAs. The first DMA is used to select a monodisperse sample from the dry polydisperse particle population, which is then exposed to a selected RH. The size distribution of the humidified particles is then measured with the second DMA, followed by the CPC. In this way, the hygroscopic growth factor GF(RH) can be retrieved (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>). The hygroscopic growth of particles with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 15, and 20 nm particles was measured with a custom built “nano-HTDMA”, described in more detail in, for example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.45"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.46"/>. In short, the nano-HTDMA system consists of two nano-DMAs (TSI, model 3085) and a water-based CPC (TSI, model 3785) to count the particles. A silica gel diffusion drier was placed in front of the first DMA to make sure the particles entered the instrument with RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %. The DMAs were operated in an open-loop system, with a sample flow of 1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a sheath flow of 10 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. To ensure stable conditions through the particle sizing, the sample flow and the sheath air inside the second DMA were humidified separately. The measured GFs were then corrected to the target RH of 80 %, assuming a constant hygroscopicity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> within small deviation around the target humidity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.47"/>. Ammonium sulfate particles (Sigma Aldrich, purity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) were used to calibrate the instrument for offsets in dry size selection. After taking into account the uncertainties of all devices influencing particle sizing, the uncertainty in the GFs can be estimated to be at maximum 2.5 %. The hygroscopic growth of particles with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 50, 80, 100, and 150 nm was measured with a commercially available HTDMA (Brechtel, Model 3002, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="altparen.48"/>), from now on termed “long-HTDMA”. A diffusion drier at the inlet ensured that particles entered the instrument at RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %. The aerosol flow of the first and second DMA were 0.8 and 0.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, while the sheath flows were 5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in both systems. The instrument was calibrated using ammonium sulfate (Sigma Aldrich, purity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) particles. The overall uncertainty in GF (80 %) is estimated to be below 3 %, based on the combination of instrumental uncertainty (estimated to be 2 % sizing accuracy and 1 % RH uncertainty) and comparison to theoretical values calculated with Köhler theory (max. 2 % for the chosen size range).</p>
      <p id="d1e2550">The ability of particles to act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) was monitored with a continuous-flow streamwise thermal-gradient ccn chamber (CFSTGC, CCN-100 from Droplet Measurement Technologies; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="altparen.49"/>). The CCN instrument was operated following the Scanning Mobility CCN Analysis (SMCA) described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.50"/> to increase the temporal resolution. In short, we measured the critical dry diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p,c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of mobility size-selected aerosols. Aerosol-laden air from AURA was dried using diffusion dryers (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %) before entering the electrostatic classifier. The classifier consisted of a long-DMA (TSI model 3081) and an aerosol neutraliser (X-ray source, TSI model 3087). A scanning voltage was applied (scan time 120 s up and 15 s down), and the mono-disperse outlet stream of the DMA was directed to both the CCNc and CPC (TSI model 3010). Time was synchronised daily. The CCN supersaturation was initially set high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), since the newly formed aerosols were small in the beginning. As the particle size distribution grew to larger sizes, the supersaturation of the CCNc was decreased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, which is representative for supersaturations found in the marine environment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.51"/>. Scan time alignment, multiple charge correction, quality control, and sigmoidal fitting of the activation curves (CCN/CN vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were done using the “SMCAProcessor.xls” file, available at <uri>http://nenes.eas.gatech.edu/Experiments/SMCA.html</uri> (last access: 1 February 2019). The supersaturation of the CCN column was calibrated on 11 March 2019 using atomised ammonium sulfate (99.9999 % purity, 33 mg in 500 mL MilliQ). The measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p,c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used as input to the “Köhler curves” module of the Extended AIM Aerosol Thermodynamics Model to estimate the supersaturation (<uri>http://www.aim.env.uea.ac.uk/aim/kohler/kohler2.php</uri>, last access: 13 March 2019). A schematic of the SMCA calibration setup and a calibration curve performed with ammonium sulfate are shown in Figs. S2 and S3.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS6">
  <label>2.3.6</label><title>Chemical composition of particles</title>
      <p id="d1e2637">A high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS, Aerodyne Research Inc.) was used to measure the chemical composition of the particles in real time. The instrument setup is described in detail in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.52"/>. The instrument was employed as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.53"/>. HR-ToF-AMS data were processed in Igor Pro 8 by the data analysis software packages SQUIRREL (version 1.62) and PIKA (version 1.22). The PIKA default HR-ToF-AMS collection efficiency (CE) of 1 was used. The MSA calibration as presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.54"/> was applied to quantify particulate MSA. Unit-mass resolution efficient particle time-of-flight (ePToF) data were exported for the MSA tracer ion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 79 and sulfate tracer ion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 80. This sulfate tracer ion was selected, because MSA only contributes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 signal.
The relationship between vacuum aerodynamic diameters, as retrieved from ePToF data and mobility diameters for spherical particles, used in the measurement of the water uptake, can be calculated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.55"/>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M156" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>va</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>va</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vacuum aerodynamic diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the electric mobility diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is standard density (1 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the density of the particle. The particles were assumed to have no voids, which results in the density of the particle being equal to the density of the material. PToF time series were smoothed using a 15-point (i.e. 15 min) moving average to decrease short-term fluctuations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Quantum chemical calculations</title>
      <p id="d1e2812">To obtain molecular-level insight into the hydration-free energy of MSA, we carried out highly accurate quantum chemical calculations of the MSA-hydrate cluster structures. These calculations will aid in elucidating to what extent the MSA molecules are hydrated in the gas phase.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>2.4.1</label><title>Computational details</title>
      <p id="d1e2822">The Gaussian09 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.56"/> program was used to obtain the molecular cluster structures and to calculate the vibrational frequencies. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>B97X-D <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.57"/> functional was employed, as it has been shown to exhibit low errors in the binding energies of atmospheric molecular clusters compared to higher level CCSD(T) calculations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx20" id="altparen.58"/>). The calculations were performed using the 6-31++G(d,p) basis set, which has shown good agreement with basis sets of significantly larger sizes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx57" id="altparen.59"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2844">The ORCA program version 4.0.0 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.60"/> was used to calculate the single point energy (i.e. the electronic energy of a molecule for a certain arrangement of the atoms in the molecule) of all the clusters using DLPNO-CCSD(T<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx70" id="altparen.61"/>) with an aug-cc-pVTZ basis set. The aug-cc-pVTZ/C and aug-cc-pVTZ/JK auxiliary basis sets were used for density fitting and Coulomb or exchange fitting. We have recently demonstrated that this level of theory yields total and relative binding energy results in good agreement with higher level, explicitly correlated, coupled cluster calculations on a test set of 45 cluster structures  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.62"/> and sulfuric acid hydrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="altparen.63"/>). All the thermochemical parameters have been calculated at 298.15 K and 1 atm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>2.4.2</label><title>Cluster structure sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e2876">We have recently reported the application of a systematic sampling technique to obtain the molecular structures of sulfuric acid–water clusters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.64"/> and carboxylic acid–water clusters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.65"/>. Here, we utilise the same method to thoroughly sample the rich potential energy surface of the methanesulfonic acid (MSA)–water clusters. The following procedure was applied:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2887">Water molecules are placed around all the exterior atoms of the cluster.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2891">Generated conformers are optimised using the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.66"/> method.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2907">Identical conformers were excluded based on energy and rotational temperature.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2911">The Gibbs free energy is calculated at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>B97X-D/6-31++G(d,p) level of theory.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2922">All conformers below 3 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are then used as input structures for the addition of the next water molecules (step 1).</p></list-item></list>
This approach generates a massive amount of conformers (350, 1084, 2027, 6801, and 5542 for the respective hydrates) and will yield a qualified guess for the global minimum cluster structure.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Nucleation and growth rates at different temperatures</title>
      <p id="d1e2955">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a presents particle number concentrations and nucleation rates of particles larger than 1.7 nm in diameter at 258 K (in blue), 273 K (in orange), and 293 K (in red), measured during Exp. 5, 9, and 11, respectively. The highest particle number concentrations were recorded at 298 K and the lowest ones at 258 K. Nucleation rates increased with increasing temperature, e.g. from 68.7 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 258 K to 426.3 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 293 K. New particle formation was initiated at an earlier point in time at 293 K (immediately after DMS injection) compared to 258 K (approximately 10 min after DMS injection).</p>
      <p id="d1e3008">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b shows particle growth rates (GR) of particles with diameters between 10 and 20 nm, calculated using the maximum concentration method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.67"/>. The overall GR range (4.5–26.2 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; see values in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) fits well with ambient values measured in marine and coastal areas (1.8–20 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx95" id="altparen.68"/>). Similar to the nucleation rates, GR increases with increasing temperature. The colour code in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b denotes the RH during the experiments. Results at 293 K show that lower RH values lead to lower GR compared to experiments performed at high RH.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3050"><bold>(a)</bold> Nucleation rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of particles larger than 1.7 nm during Exp. 5, 9, and 11, and <bold>(b)</bold> growth rates (GR) for the size range of 10–20 nm at three different temperatures during Exp. 1–11. The fluctuations seen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">273</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K (light yellow dots) are due to the fact that the PSM was set to measure in scanning mode during this period <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.69"/>. These data were not used for the calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and are only illustrated to show the reader that the maximum in number concentration had been reached.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/13449/2022/acp-22-13449-2022-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3098">The decrease of nucleation and growth rates with decreasing temperature is consistent with a lower observed loss rate of DMS at lower temperatures; see Fig. S4 and Table S1 in the Supplement, which illustrate an example for each of the temperatures investigated in this study and a comparison between dry and humid experiments (Exp. 1, 2, 8, and 10). Different temperature trends for the rate of the reaction of DMS with OH radicals have been reported in the literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.70"/>. Our observed trend is in line with the predicted temperature dependence obtained with the Arrhenius expression used in the Master Chemical Mechanism version 3.3.1 (MCMv3.3.1) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.71"/>, delineating slower reaction rates at colder temperatures. The decay of the concentration of DMS over time for similar experiments at 293 and 273 K, dry and humid conditions, was formerly presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="text.72"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.73"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.74"/> found good agreement between measured and modelled decay rates using the ADCHAM box model.</p>
      <p id="d1e3116">Nucleation and growth rates are known to be inherently dependent on temperature and RH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.75"/>. Typically, at lower temperatures, both nucleation and growth rates increase as the Gibbs free energy barrier decreases. This has also been observed in laboratory experiments with homogeneous nucleation of sulfuric acid and water at temperatures between 207–299 K and RH between 11–58 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.76"/>. Ambient measurements of nucleation and growth rates, however, show ambiguous trends probably related to different temperature-dependent processes occurring at the same time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.77"/>. A possible explanation for the decreasing nucleation and growth rates with decreasing temperatures seen in this study can be that the oxidation of DMS is slower at colder temperatures; thus, fewer volatile compounds are available for cluster formation, as they are formed more slowly. This is also supported by the above presented DMS decay trends illustrating slower decay rates with colder temperatures. The absolute water concentration could also have an effect on the observed trends in the nucleation rate, as the initial cluster formation in our chamber setup most likely consisted of relatively weakly bound sulfuric acid–methane sulfonic acid–ammonia clusters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.78"/>. Water has been shown to increase the nucleation rate if the initial cluster is weakly bound, such as for sulfuric acid–ammonia clusters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.79"/>. However, in our studies, the absolute concentration of water is lowest at colder temperatures.</p>
      <p id="d1e3134">OH concentrations in the chamber were obtained from the decay of 1-butanol due to reactions with OH radicals produced by photolysing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 1-butanol decay rates and resulting OH concentrations for experiments performed at the same temperature and humidity conditions as those used in the DMS experiments presented herein are illustrated in Fig. S5 and Table S2.</p>
      <p id="d1e3153">The OH concentrations found herein are in the range of tropospheric levels (e.g. 1–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="altparen.80"/>;  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.09</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="altparen.81"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Hygroscopicity, CCN activity, and chemical composition</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Effect of atmospheric ageing at 293\,K}?><title>Effect of atmospheric ageing at 293 K</title>
      <p id="d1e3233">Atmospheric ageing of DMS-derived secondary aerosols was simulated by prolonged exposure to OH radicals at different temperatures and RH. We first consider the water uptake at sub- and supersaturated water vapour conditions at 293 K for both dry and humid conditions. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> illustrates the water uptake behaviour in the form of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values obtained from hygroscopic growth and CCN measurements overlaid on particle number size distributions during Exp. 5 (humid conditions) and Exp. 7 (dry conditions). In both cases, clear nucleation events are visible, with particles growing up to approximately 150 nm in diameter within the first 10 h. As mentioned in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.82"/>, an additional growth mode is observed, and from Fig. 2, it seems to be more pronounced at dry compared to humid conditions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a vs. b).</p>
      <p id="d1e3250"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are only presented for times when the selected dry diameter was within the boundary chosen to represent the main growth mode (see description in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4"/>). The colour code describes the magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, where dark blue colours represent low values and light blue colours high values. Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values during the main particle growth mode for 80 nm particles (dry size), as retrieved from long-HTDMA measurements in Exp. 5 and 7, were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03, respectively. These were calculated from GF (80 %) results of 1.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 and 1.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values derived for other particle sizes are presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, and the GF (80 %) results are presented in Table S3. In comparison, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values from CCNc measurements for dry particles of approximately 80 nm yielded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 for Exp. 5 and 7, respectively (all mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values from CCNc are presented in Table S4). Thus, for this size, mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values at sub- and supersaturated water vapour conditions are well comparable and agree within the standard variations of the measurements. Figure S6 shows the derived mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values as a function of all measured dry particle diameters for Exp. 5 and 7. There is no systematic trend in the variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with particle diameter for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values calculated from GFs, while an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with particle size can be seen for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values calculated from CCNc data. Such a size trend can be expected from Köhler theory; for comparison, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value for ammonium sulfate varies from 0.51 to 0.63 over the particle size range 20–100 nm (calculated using UManSysprop at 293 K, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="altparen.83"/>). Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values during the main particle growth mode are consistent across instruments and supersaturations. Agreement between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values derived for the same particle size from measurements at sub- and supersaturation is not necessarily expected, as shown by several earlier studies for organic and inorganic particles  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.84"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3465"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values as obtained from nano- (triangles) and long-HTDMA (squares) and from CCNc (circle) measurements for different dry particle sizes. Particle number size distributions of the DMS-derived aerosol particles at dry and wet conditions are shown in the background. Results are from <bold>(a)</bold> Exp. 7 (dry) and <bold>(b)</bold> Exp. 5 (wet). </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/13449/2022/acp-22-13449-2022-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3487">Following the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for a certain size, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> it can be seen that the values increase over time, meaning that hygroscopicity increases with ageing by exposure to OH radicals and UV light, indicating slight changes in chemical composition. In Exp. 7, performed under dry conditions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a), dry 80 nm particles could first be measured approximately 4 h after the start of the experiment, showing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.50, which increased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.58 at about 7 h after the start of the experiment. Similarly, in Exp. 5, performed under humid conditions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value for dry 80 nm particles changed from 0.51 to 0.63 (measured at approximately 4 and 8 h after the start of the experiment). Similar trends were observed in Exp. 8 and 10, performed at different temperatures and shown in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e3525">To further investigate this change in hygroscopicity as a result of ageing, we extracted size-selected ePToF data from the HR-ToF-AMS. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> illustrates the temporal evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 79 and 80, representative for MSA and ammonium sulfate, respectively. Only data for particles with an aerodynamic diameter of approximately 126 nm are illustrated, as these correspond to particles with a mobility diameter of 80 nm, assuming that particles were spherical and composed of approximately 50 % MSA and 50 % ammonium sulfate, thus having a density of approximately 1.6 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (density of MSA: 1.48 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, density of ammonium sulfate: 1.77 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; according to Sigma-Aldrich). This assumption is based on bulk chemical composition data from HR-ToF-AMS, presented in Fig. S7. Only results for Exp. 5 (wet conditions) and Exp. 6 (dry conditions) are shown, as the signal on the chosen marker ions was highest during these experiments; thus, best PToF data analysis could be performed. The black lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> denote the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 79 to 80, and the vertical grey, dashed lines depict the time interval when this selected size was present within the main particle growth mode. When performing a linear regression to the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 79 to 80, when the ion signal was above 0.2 (threshold chosen to be less influenced by noise), a slow decrease is visible, indicating an increased fraction of ammonium sulfate in the particles with time (red solid lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) under both dry and humid conditions. During this campaign, the HR-ToF-AMS was not set up in a way to resolve size-selected properties at low aerosol mass concentration, as only 30 s were spent on ePToF data acquisition for each 1 min data point. Thus, these results have to be treated with care, and further experiments targeting the size-selected chemical composition of secondary particles formed from the oxidation of DMS are needed to obtain a more detailed understanding of changes in the chemical composition of DMS-derived products.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3609">Temporal evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 79 (violet dots) and 80 (red dots), representative for MSA and ammonium sulfate, respectively, as measured in the HR-ToF-AMS during <bold>(a)</bold> Exp. 6 (dry conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">293</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K) and <bold>(b)</bold> Exp. 5 (wet conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">293</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K). The black solid lines denote the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 79 to 80, as calculated during the main particle growth mode in the chamber (represented by vertical dashed lines). A linear fit was calculated for the ratio during the time period where both ions had a signal higher than 0.2 (dark red line), indicating a linear decrease over this period. </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/13449/2022/acp-22-13449-2022-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3673">Previous HTDMA measurements of pure MSA particles at 293 K yielded GF (90 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.57 for a dry particle size of 100 nm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.85"/>, which translates to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and GF (80 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.33 (recalculated using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.86"/> predicted the supersaturation needed to activate MSA particles at 293.15 K with dry sizes between 20 and 200 nm with the AIOMFAC model, finding a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.55 for 80 nm particles (critical supersaturations presented in the Supplement of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.87"/> and recalculated using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory). Lower  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.40 for 80 nm particles were modelled for ammonium–MSA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.88"/>. In comparison, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for 80 nm ammonium sulfate particles are 0.59 and 0.62, according to the UManSysProp thermodynamic model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.89"/>, for subsaturated (GF (80 nm, 80 %)) and supersaturated (80 nm dry size) conditions, respectively. Assuming particles are composed of 50 % MSA and 50 % ammonium sulfate, as indicated by the HTR-ToF-MS results in this study, mixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values can be retrieved using the modelled data of the single substances, yielding 0.57 and 0.59 for 80 nm particles using ammonium sulfate results at sub- and supersaturated conditions, respectively. Our mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> results are considerably higher than those for pure MSA from HTDMA measurements, presented earlier by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.90"/> and being closest to AIOMFAC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for MSA while being lower than the ammonium sulfate values from UManSysProp. The range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values measured within this study is consistent with the hygroscopicity of a mixture of MSA and ammonium sulfate. As the hygroscopicity of ammonium sulfate is larger than that of MSA, a change in chemical composition during ageing leading to a higher fraction of ammonium sulfate in the particles could be responsible for the measured increase in hygroscopicity over time.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Effect of lower temperatures</title>
      <p id="d1e3794">Experiments at 258, 273, and 293 K and high relative humidity were carried out to explore how the hygroscopicity and CCN activation potential are affected by the temperature during particle formation and subsequent ageing. Similar to the results at 293 K, the hygroscopicity of the particles formed at 258 and 273 K increases with ageing (see Figs. S8 and S9). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a illustrates mean GF (80 %) as measured by nano- and long-HTDMA, and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b illustrates mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values as calculated from HTDMA and CCNc results for the three different temperatures. The mean values are calculated from the time period when a certain size was measured in the main growth mode, as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4"/>. Only data for humid experiments are shown, i.e. Exp. 2–5 and 8–11. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> shows mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for each experiment (mean GF (80 %) values and mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values from the CCNc are presented in Table S4). When comparing results at 293 K in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a, it is evident that GF (80 %) values are smaller for smaller sizes. This difference disappears when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are compared (spherical symbols), indicating that this difference originates from the Kelvin term that is more important for particles of approximately 15 nm in dry size compared to those of approximately 80 nm. GF (80 %) values in the long-HTDMA range seem comparable at all temperatures, while the nano-HTDMA shows a tendency for smaller GF (80 %) at 293 K compared to 258 K. When comparing HTDMA data in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b, which illustrates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, this general trend of less hygroscopic particles at 293 K compared to 258 K is also visible. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b additionally illustrates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values as derived from CCNc measurements (square symbols). Generally, the ranges of the CCNc results are more scattered, but they overlap with HTDMA results. The majority of the herein presented experimental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values lie in the range of modelled values for MSA and ammonium–MSA, as found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.91"/> (theoretical values depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b); the experimental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values at 258 K for small particles exceed the modelled MSA results and are more comparable with the theoretical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for ammonium sulfate.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3884">Temperature dependence of water uptake: <bold>(a)</bold> GF (80 %), as measured from nano- and long-HTDMA (spheres), <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, as measured from nano- and long-HTDMA (spheres) and CCNc (squares). The size of the markers is related to the dry particle size selected, i.e. smaller markers describe results for smaller particles and vice versa. Results describe Exp. 2–5 and 8–11 at high humidity conditions. The theoretical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.92"/> for MSA and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>MSA for 80 nm dry particles and from the UManSysProp model for ammonium sulfate (AS), as found for 80 nm dry particles, as recalculated from sub- and supersaturated water vapour conditions.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/13449/2022/acp-22-13449-2022-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3929">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values and their standard deviations (1 SD), as calculated from nano- and long-HTDMA.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Exp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">number</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4955">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values at 273 and 293 K for particles with dry sizes of 80 and 100 nm. Colour scheme shows the average MSA to sulfate ratio during the time period when the specific dry size was measured. Exp. 1–9 are shown.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/13449/2022/acp-22-13449-2022-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4971">The relative contributions and absolute concentrations of organics, nitrate, sulfate, ammonia, chloride, and MSA are illustrated in Fig. S7 for experiments performed at 273 and 293 K. Absolute concentrations show that, in general, the aerosol mass loading was small and that the organic contribution was comparable during all experiments. As previously discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.93"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.94"/>, we cannot conclude on the exact origin of the organic signal. A thorough analysis of the organic mass spectra revealed that the organic mass signal is composed of the sum of many low-intensity fragments that we cannot attribute to a specific source (see example organic mass spectrum for Exp. 5). It cannot be entirely excluded that it is due to contamination from previous experiments. It could, however, also derive from biases due to the complex fragmentation during ionisation and uncertainties arising from the calibration with MSA. Additionally, instrumental memory effects have previously been documented for the AMS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.95"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Two ionisation efficiency calibrations before and after the experiments could neither exclude nor completely prove memory effects. If the organic signal stems from uncertainties in the analysis, it will not influence hygroscopicity. In the case that the organic signal is real, the herein presented hygroscopicity results represent lower estimates of the inorganic aerosol hygroscopicity, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for organics in the range 0–0.2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.96"/> can be expected, which would lead to a decrease of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values measured for an organic–inorganic mixture.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5005">Identified lowest Gibbs free energy (MSA)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cluster structures calculated at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>B97X-D/6-31++G(d,p) level of theory. The green circles indicate the formation of a H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/13449/2022/acp-22-13449-2022-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5072">The chemical composition of the aerosol particles could not be measured at 258 K due to the low mass produced during these experiments. Experiments 8 and 9 were carried out at 273 K, but no obvious difference was found compared to the experiments carried out at 293 K. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> illustrates mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values colour coded by the MSA to sulfate ratio measured by the HR-ToF-AMS at 293 and 273 K. We selected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for dry particles of 80 and 100 nm (long-HTDMA), as these sizes are more representative of the size range analysed by the HR-ToF-AMS (typically PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Tabular values of MSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are given in Table S5. The MSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is highest in Exp. 1 and 7, which were performed at 293 K and dry conditions, reaching values above 3. These high values at dry and warm conditions were already discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.97"/>. Contrarily, Exp. 6, which was also carried out at 293 K and dry conditions, shows a small MSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 1.3. This difference could potentially originate from the higher RH values of 13.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 in Exp. 6 compared to RH below 10 % in Exp. 1 and 7. At 293 K and high humidity conditions, the MSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios vary from 2.7 to 1.4, where experiments at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations yield high values and experiments at high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions yield low values. At 273 K and high humidity conditions, the values during experiments with high or low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coincide, yielding ratios of 1.5. As seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values at 273 K vary most, while their MSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios are the same. At 293 K, on the other hand, the MSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios vary from 3 to 1.4, as discussed above, but no clear trend is observed in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, i.e. higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are associated with both high and low MSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios.</p>
      <p id="d1e5346">To the best of our knowledge, there are no previous measurements of the water uptake of MSA or ammonium–MSA particles at 258 or 273 K. When using the UManSysProp thermodynamic model to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for ammonium sulfate particles at 293 and 258 K, only small variations are found. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.59 and 0.58 at 293 and 258 K, respectively, are found based on hygroscopic growth, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.63 and 0.59 at 293 and 258 K, respectively, are found based on CCN activation potential. This is consistent with previous findings showing that the water activity of ammonium sulfate in this temperature range is quite constant <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.98"/>. Due to the similarities between ammonium sulfate and MSA, we thus expect that the temperature dependence of the water uptake of MSA is also negligible.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Quantum chemical calculations of gas-phase hydration of MSA</title>
      <p id="d1e5382">Gas-phase chemistry might be influenced by the presence of water molecules. We carried out detailed quantum chemical calculations to investigate whether the formed MSA is hydrated in the gas phase. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> presents the lowest free energy cluster structures (298.15 K and 1 atm) obtained at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>B97X-D/6-31++G(d,p) level of theory.</p>
      <p id="d1e5394">The formed (MSA)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> clusters show some differences compared to the corresponding sulfuric acid–water clusters (see Table S6). A proton transfer in the global free energy structures of the (MSA)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> clusters is observed, whereas at least six water molecules are required in the case of sulfuric acid clusters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.99"/>. The calculated reaction free energy at the DLPNO-CCSD(T<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)/aug-cc-pVTZ//<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>B97X-D/6-31++G(d,p) level of theory for adding the first four water molecules to MSA is less favourable than adding water molecules to sulfuric acid (see Supplement). This indicates that gas-phase MSA is significantly less hygroscopic compared to SA.</p>
      <p id="d1e5481">The hydrate distribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the (MSA)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> clusters can be calculated to elucidate the extent to which the clusters are hydrated under realistic atmospheric conditions. The hydrate distributions can be calculated as follows (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.100"/>):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M374" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">)</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e5602">Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the given hydrate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the binding free energy of the cluster, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference pressure (1 atm). The population of the un-hydrated cluster <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is normalised so that all the populations sum up to 1. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0316</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atm is the saturation water vapour pressure at 298.15 K. We find that the MSA clusters are predominantly not hydrated in the gas phase (see Fig. S11). At low RH (20 %), the MSA monohydrate population is only 3 %. At increasing RH, the monohydrate becomes more pronounced, with a value of 14 % at 100 % RH. Even at 100 % RH, the dihydrate is only 0.7 % populated. In contrast, the monohydrate and dihydrate of SA are populated by 32 % and 6 %, respectively, at 100 % RH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.101"/>. These findings imply that MSA is not significantly hydrated in the gas phase, and water should have little influence on the gas-phase chemistry. This is consistent with a previous study on the effect of a single water molecule on the reactions between the OH radical and MSA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.102"/>, where water was also found to have no influence on the reaction kinetics.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e5687">The oceans emit large quantities of DMS, which can act as a precursor for the production and growth of aerosol particles. In this study, we investigate the oxidation of DMS by hydroxyl radicals, with a special focus on the hygroscopicity and CCN activity potential of the particles. The experiments were carried out in the temperature range of 258–293 K at dry and humid conditions in the AURA chamber and complemented by quantum chemical calculations.</p>
      <p id="d1e5690">The nucleation and growth rates of the new particles formed were smaller at cold temperatures compared to at warm temperatures. This temperature dependence is unexpected but most likely originates from a slower oxidation of DMS at 258 K compared to at 293 K. Higher relative humidities did not seem to significantly affect the decay of DMS during oxidation with OH radicals but led to lower particle growth rates compared to at low relative humidities. Quantum chemical calculations revealed that gas-phase MSA clusters are predominantly not hydrated; thus, high humidity conditions are not expected to influence its gas-phase chemistry.</p>
      <p id="d1e5693">The average hygroscopicity parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated from measurements performed during the main particles' growth mode at sub- and supersaturated water vapour conditions at 293 K, ranged from 0.48 to 0.52 for dry 80 nm particles. These values may represent lower limits and are well comparable with modelled values for MSA or mixtures of MSA and ammonium sulfate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.103"/>. These results are also consistent with online chemical composition measurements revealing that the largest fraction of the particles was MSA followed by ammonium sulfate. During ageing by exposure to hydroxyl radicals, the water uptake of the particles increased, as found for all investigated sizes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–150 nm) at sub- and supersaturated water vapour conditions. The size-selected results from the HR-ToF-AMS indicate that this could originate from a change in the MSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate ratio, with ageing favouring more ammonium sulfate in the particles with longer ageing. When oxidising DMS at colder temperatures, a slight increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values is visible, which is more pronounced for smaller particles. The MSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate ratio did not show a clear temperature trend but showed a dependency on RH, where highest values were measured at low relative humidities.</p>
      <p id="d1e5743">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values found in this study for particles produced by the oxidation of DMS by OH radicals lie within the upper range of the so-called “more-hygroscopic particle” (MHP) mode, defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.104"/> as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range between approximately 0.17 and 0.66. This is the prevailing hygroscopicity group found from observations in the marine environment. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.105"/> described a potential source of these particles to be partly neutralised DMS-derived sulfate particles as well as aged sea salt particles and mixtures with organic matter. Our hygroscopicity results are consistent with these observations, underlining the high water uptake potential of particles formed via the oxidation of DMS by OH radicals. Aerosol particles from new particle formation have been shown to contribute the major fraction of all particles in remote continental regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.106"/>. Specifically, at Arctic sites, new particles formed from the oxidation of DMS have been found to be important for the particle population, for their growth, and for their potential to act as CCN <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.107"/>. Recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97" id="text.108"/> provided evidence for regular and frequent new particle formation in remote marine locations, thereby contradicting the common view of rare occurrences in these areas (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="altparen.109"/>). There is still a substantial knowledge gap regarding the detailed processes occurring in the ambient atmosphere. Thus, this laboratory study provides new insights into the properties of particles formed from DMS oxidation at different temperatures and humidity regimes, which is needed to understand atmospheric observations.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5784">The experimental data obtained in this study and the codes for the analysis, written in MATLAB, are available at <uri>https://sciencedata.dk/shared/4f1826ab4877ee70a2388cd519b3039a</uri> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="altparen.110"/>). Results from the quantum-chemical calculations are available on request from Jonas Elm.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e5793">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13449-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13449-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5802">BR, MB, and AV designed and supervised the research; BR, SI, and SC performed and analysed the different water uptake measurements; MMJ and SPM performed and analysed the chemical composition measurements with input from MG; BR performed and analysed the gas-phase measurements; JE performed and analysed the quantum chemical simulations; AM, AV, and MB contributed to interpreting the results. BR and SI wrote the paper with contributions from all co-authors. All authors read and reviewed the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5808">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e5814">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5820">We thank the Villum Foundation for supporting the long-HTDMA involved in this study. We also thank Jon Bjarke Valbaek Mygind and Anders Feilberg for their involvement in the PTR measurements, and Olli Väisänen for his help with the nano-HTDMA setup and analysis. We also thank Athanasios Nenes and his group for providing the SMCA analysis software.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e5825">This research has been supported by the Austrian Science Fund (grant no. J 3970-N36), the Academy of Finland (grant no. grant No 337550), the Carlsbergfondet (grant no. CF20-0637), and Aarhus University and the University of Eastern Finland Doctoral Program in Environmental Physics, Health and Biology.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5831">This paper was edited by Qi Chen and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Albu et~al.(2006)Albu, Barnes, Becker, Patroescu-Klotz, Mocanu, and
Benter}}?><label>Albu et al.(2006)Albu, Barnes, Becker, Patroescu-Klotz, Mocanu, and
Benter</label><?label Albu2006?><mixed-citation>Albu, M., Barnes, I., Becker, K. H., Patroescu-Klotz, I., Mocanu, R., and
Benter, T.: Rate coefficients for the gas-phase reaction of OH radicals with
dimethyl sulfide: temperature and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partial pressure dependence, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 8, 728–736, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B512536G" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B512536G</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Andreae(1990)}}?><label>Andreae(1990)</label><?label Andreae1990?><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O.: Ocean–atmosphere Interactions in the Global Biogeochemical
Sulfur Cycle, Mar. Chem., 30, 1–29, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ayers and Cainey(2007)}}?><label>Ayers and Cainey(2007)</label><?label Ayers2007?><mixed-citation>
Ayers, G. P. and Cainey, J. M.: The CLAW hypothesis: a review of the major
developments, Environ. Chem., 4, 366–374, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Barnes et~al.(2006)Barnes, Hjorth, and Mihalopoulos}}?><label>Barnes et al.(2006)Barnes, Hjorth, and Mihalopoulos</label><?label Barnes2006?><mixed-citation>Barnes, I., Hjorth, J., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Dimethyl Sulfide and Dimethyl
Sulfoxide and Their Oxidation in the Atmosphere, Chem. Rev., 106,
940–975, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020529+" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr020529+</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Beck et~al.(2021)Beck, Sarnela, Junninen, Hoppe, Garmash, Bianchi,
Riva, Rose, Peräkylä, Wimmer, Kausiala, Jokinen, Ahonen, Mikkilä, Hakala,
He, Kontkanen, Wolf, Cappelletti, Mazzola, Traversi, Petroselli, Viola,
Vitale, Lange, Massling, Nøjgaard, Krejci, Karlsson, Zieger, Jang, Lee,
Vakkari, Lampilahti, Thakur, Leino, Kangasluoma, Duplissy, Siivola, Marbouti,
Tham, Saiz-Lopez, Petäjä, Ehn, Worsnop, Skov, Kulmala, Kerminen, and
Sipilä}}?><label>Beck et al.(2021)Beck, Sarnela, Junninen, Hoppe, Garmash, Bianchi,
Riva, Rose, Peräkylä, Wimmer, Kausiala, Jokinen, Ahonen, Mikkilä, Hakala,
He, Kontkanen, Wolf, Cappelletti, Mazzola, Traversi, Petroselli, Viola,
Vitale, Lange, Massling, Nøjgaard, Krejci, Karlsson, Zieger, Jang, Lee,
Vakkari, Lampilahti, Thakur, Leino, Kangasluoma, Duplissy, Siivola, Marbouti,
Tham, Saiz-Lopez, Petäjä, Ehn, Worsnop, Skov, Kulmala, Kerminen, and
Sipilä</label><?label Beck2021?><mixed-citation>Beck, L. J., Sarnela, N., Junninen, H., Hoppe, C. J. M., Garmash, O., Bianchi,
F., Riva, M., Rose, C., Peräkylä, O., Wimmer, D., Kausiala, O., Jokinen,
T., Ahonen, L., Mikkilä, J., Hakala, J., He, X.-C., Kontkanen, J., Wolf, K.
K. E., Cappelletti, D., Mazzola, M., Traversi, R., Petroselli, C., Viola,
A. P., Vitale, V., Lange, R., Massling, A., Nøjgaard, J. K., Krejci, R.,
Karlsson, L., Zieger, P., Jang, S., Lee, K., Vakkari, V., Lampilahti, J.,
Thakur, R. C., Leino, K., Kangasluoma, J., Duplissy, E.-M., Siivola, E.,
Marbouti, M., Tham, Y. J., Saiz-Lopez, A., Petäjä, T., Ehn, M., Worsnop,
D. R., Skov, H., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.-M., and Sipilä, M.: Differing
Mechanisms of New Particle Formation at Two Arctic Sites, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091334,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091334" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL091334</ext-link>,  2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Berg et~al.(1998)Berg, Swietlicki, and Krejci}}?><label>Berg et al.(1998)Berg, Swietlicki, and Krejci</label><?label Berg1998?><mixed-citation>Berg, O. H., Swietlicki, E., and Krejci, R.: Hygroscopic growth of aerosol
particles in the marine boundary layer over the Pacific and Southern Oceans
during the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1), J.   Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 16535–16545,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02851" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD02851</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cappellin et~al.(2012)Cappellin, Karl, Probst, Ismailova, Winkler,
Soukoulis, Aprea, Märk, Gasperi, and Biasioli}}?><label>Cappellin et al.(2012)Cappellin, Karl, Probst, Ismailova, Winkler,
Soukoulis, Aprea, Märk, Gasperi, and Biasioli</label><?label Cappellin2012?><mixed-citation>Cappellin, L., Karl, T., Probst, M., Ismailova, O., Winkler, P. M., Soukoulis,
C., Aprea, E., Märk, T. D., Gasperi, F., and Biasioli, F.: On Quantitative
Determination of Volatile Organic Compound Concentrations Using Proton
Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci.   Technol., 46, 2283–2290, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es203985t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es203985t</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Carpenter et~al.(2012)Carpenter, Archer, and Beale}}?><label>Carpenter et al.(2012)Carpenter, Archer, and Beale</label><?label Carpenter2012?><mixed-citation>Carpenter, L. J., Archer, S. D., and Beale, R.: Ocean-atmosphere trace gas
exchange, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6473–6506, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35121H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C2CS35121H</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Chai and Head-Gordon(2008)}}?><label>Chai and Head-Gordon(2008)</label><?label Chai_pccp_2008?><mixed-citation>
Chai, J.-D. and Head-Gordon, M.: Long-range Corrected Hybrid Density
Functionals with Damped Atom-atom Dispersion Corrections, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 10, 6615–6620, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Charlson et~al.(1987)Charlson, Lovelock, Andreae, and
Warren}}?><label>Charlson et al.(1987)Charlson, Lovelock, Andreae, and
Warren</label><?label Charlson1987?><mixed-citation>Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., and Warren, S. G.: Oceanic
phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate, Nature, 326,
655–661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/326655a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/326655a0</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Collins et~al.(2013)Collins, Ault, Moffet, Ruppel, Cuadra-Rodriguez,
Guasco, Corrigan, Pedler, Azam, Aluwihare, Bertram, Roberts, Grassian, and
Prather}}?><label>Collins et al.(2013)Collins, Ault, Moffet, Ruppel, Cuadra-Rodriguez,
Guasco, Corrigan, Pedler, Azam, Aluwihare, Bertram, Roberts, Grassian, and
Prather</label><?label Collins2013?><mixed-citation>Collins, D. B., Ault, A. P., Moffet, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Cuadra-Rodriguez,
L. A., Guasco, T. L., Corrigan, C. E., Pedler, B. E., Azam, F., Aluwihare,
L. I., Bertram, T. H., Roberts, G. C., Grassian, V. H., and Prather, K. A.:
Impact of marine biogeochemistry on the chemical mixing state and cloud
forming ability of nascent sea spray aerosol, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 8553–8565,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50598" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50598</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Collins et~al.(2016)Collins, Bertram, Sultana, Lee, Axson, and
Prather}}?><label>Collins et al.(2016)Collins, Bertram, Sultana, Lee, Axson, and
Prather</label><?label Collins2016?><mixed-citation>Collins, D. B., Bertram, T. H., Sultana, C. M., Lee, C., Axson, J. L., and
Prather, K. A.: Phytoplankton blooms weakly influence the cloud forming
ability of sea spray aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 9975–9983,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069922" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069922</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Covert et~al.(1998)Covert, Gras, Wiedensohler, and
Stratmann}}?><label>Covert et al.(1998)Covert, Gras, Wiedensohler, and
Stratmann</label><?label Covert1998?><mixed-citation>Covert, D. S., Gras, J. L., Wiedensohler, A., and Stratmann, F.: Comparison of
directly measured CCN with CCN modeled from the number-size distribution in
the marine boundary layer during ACE 1 at Cape Grim, Tasmania, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 16597–16608,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD01093</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{DeCarlo et~al.(2004)DeCarlo, Slowik, Worsnop, Davidovits, and
Jimenez}}?><label>DeCarlo et al.(2004)DeCarlo, Slowik, Worsnop, Davidovits, and
Jimenez</label><?label Decarlo2004morph?><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility
and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements, Part 1: Theory, Aerosol Sci.   Technol., 38, 1185–1205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290903907" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868290903907</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Decarlo et~al.(2006)Decarlo, Kimmel, Trimborn, Northway, Jayne,
Aiken, Gonin, Fuhrer, Horvath, Docherty, Worsnop, and Jimenez}}?><label>Decarlo et al.(2006)Decarlo, Kimmel, Trimborn, Northway, Jayne,
Aiken, Gonin, Fuhrer, Horvath, Docherty, Worsnop, and Jimenez</label><?label Decarlo2006?><mixed-citation>Decarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-Deployable, High-Resolution, Time-of-Flight
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001213.Analytical" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001213.Analytical</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ditas et~al.(2012)Ditas, Shaw, Siebert, Simmel, Wehner, and
Wiedensohler}}?><label>Ditas et al.(2012)Ditas, Shaw, Siebert, Simmel, Wehner, and
Wiedensohler</label><?label Ditas2012?><mixed-citation>Ditas, F., Shaw, R. A., Siebert, H., Simmel, M., Wehner, B., and Wiedensohler, A.: Aerosols-cloud microphysics-thermodynamics-turbulence: evaluating supersaturation in a marine stratocumulus cloud, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2459–2468, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2459-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-2459-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Drewnick et~al.(2009)Drewnick, Hings, Alfarra, Prevot, and
Borrmann}}?><label>Drewnick et al.(2009)Drewnick, Hings, Alfarra, Prevot, and
Borrmann</label><?label Drewnick2009?><mixed-citation>Drewnick, F., Hings, S. S., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., and Borrmann, S.: Aerosol quantification with the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer: detection limits and ionizer background effects, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 33–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-33-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2-33-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Drewnick et~al.(2015)Drewnick, Diesch, Faber, and
Borrmann}}?><label>Drewnick et al.(2015)Drewnick, Diesch, Faber, and
Borrmann</label><?label Drewnick2015?><mixed-citation>Drewnick, F., Diesch, J.-M., Faber, P., and Borrmann, S.: Aerosol mass spectrometry: particle–vaporizer interactions and their consequences for the measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3811–3830, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3811-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-3811-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Duplissy et~al.(2016)Duplissy, Merikanto, Franchin, Tsagkogeorgas,
Kangasluoma, Wimmer, Vuollekoski, Schobesberger, Lehtipalo, Flagan, Brus,
Donahue, Vehkamäki, Almeida, Amorim, Barmet, Bianchi, Breitenlechner, Dunne,
Guida, Henschel, Junninen, Kirkby, Kürten, Kupc, Määttänen, Makhmutov,
Mathot, Nieminen, Onnela, Praplan, Riccobono, Rondo, Steiner, Tome, Walther,
Baltensperger, Carslaw, Dommen, Hansel, Petäjä, Sipilä, Stratmann, Vrtala,
Wagner, Worsnop, Curtius, and Kulmala}}?><label>Duplissy et al.(2016)Duplissy, Merikanto, Franchin, Tsagkogeorgas,
Kangasluoma, Wimmer, Vuollekoski, Schobesberger, Lehtipalo, Flagan, Brus,
Donahue, Vehkamäki, Almeida, Amorim, Barmet, Bianchi, Breitenlechner, Dunne,
Guida, Henschel, Junninen, Kirkby, Kürten, Kupc, Määttänen, Makhmutov,
Mathot, Nieminen, Onnela, Praplan, Riccobono, Rondo, Steiner, Tome, Walther,
Baltensperger, Carslaw, Dommen, Hansel, Petäjä, Sipilä, Stratmann, Vrtala,
Wagner, Worsnop, Curtius, and Kulmala</label><?label Duplissy2016?><mixed-citation>Duplissy, J., Merikanto, J., Franchin, A., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Kangasluoma, J.,
Wimmer, D., Vuollekoski, H., Schobesberger, S., Lehtipalo, K., Flagan, R. C.,
Brus, D., Donahue, N. M., Vehkamäki, H., Almeida, J., Amorim, A., Barmet,
P., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Dunne, E. M., Guida, R., Henschel, H.,
Junninen, H., Kirkby, J., Kürten, A., Kupc, A., Määttänen, A., Makhmutov,
V., Mathot, S., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Praplan, A. P., Riccobono, F.,
Rondo, L., Steiner, G., Tome, A., Walther, H., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw,
K. S., Dommen, J., Hansel, A., Petäjä, T., Sipilä, M., Stratmann, F.,
Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Worsnop, D. R., Curtius, J., and Kulmala, M.:
Effect of ions on sulfuric acid-water binary particle formation: 2.
Experimental data and comparison with QC-normalized classical nucleation
theory, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1752–1775,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023539" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023539</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Elm and Kristensen(2017)}}?><label>Elm and Kristensen(2017)</label><?label Elm_pccp_2017a?><mixed-citation>
Elm, J. and Kristensen, K.: Basis Set Convergence of the Binding Energies of
Strongly Hydrogen-Bonded Atmospheric Clusters, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 19,
1122–1133, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Elm and Mikkelsen(2014)}}?><label>Elm and Mikkelsen(2014)</label><?label Elm_cpl_2014?><mixed-citation>
Elm, J. and Mikkelsen, K. V.: Computational Approaches for Efficiently
Modelling of Small Atmospheric Clusters, Chem. Phys. Lett., 615, 26–29,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Elm et~al.(2013)Elm, Bilde, and Mikkelsen}}?><label>Elm et al.(2013)Elm, Bilde, and Mikkelsen</label><?label Elm_pccp_2013?><mixed-citation>
Elm, J., Bilde, M., and Mikkelsen, K. V.: Assessment of Binding Energies of
Atmopsheric Clusters, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 15, 16442–16445, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Facchini et~al.(2008)Facchini, Rinaldi, Decesari, Carbone, Finessi,
Mircea, Fuzzi, Ceburnis, Flanagan, Nilsson, de~Leeuw, Martino, Woeltjen, and
O'Dowd}}?><label>Facchini et al.(2008)Facchini, Rinaldi, Decesari, Carbone, Finessi,
Mircea, Fuzzi, Ceburnis, Flanagan, Nilsson, de Leeuw, Martino, Woeltjen, and
O'Dowd</label><?label Facchini2008?><mixed-citation>Facchini, M., Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Carbone, C., Finessi, E., Mircea, M.,
Fuzzi, S., Ceburnis, D., Flanagan, R., Nilsson, E., de Leeuw, G., Martino,
M., Woeltjen, J., and O'Dowd, C.: Primary submicron marine aerosol dominated
by insoluble organic colloids and aggregates, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
35, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL034210</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fossum et~al.(2018)Fossum, Ovadnevaite, Ceburnis, Dall’Osto,
Marullo, Bellacicco, Sim{\'{o}}, Liu, Flynn, Zuend et~al.}}?><label>Fossum et al.(2018)Fossum, Ovadnevaite, Ceburnis, Dall’Osto,
Marullo, Bellacicco, Simó, Liu, Flynn, Zuend et al.</label><?label fossum2018?><mixed-citation>
Fossum, K. N., Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Dall’Osto, M., Marullo, S.,
Bellacicco, M., Simó, R., Liu, D., Flynn, M., Zuend, A., and O’Dowd, C.:
Summertime primary and secondary contributions to Southern Ocean cloud
condensation nuclei, Sci. Rep., 8, 1–14, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Frisch et~al.(2013)Frisch, Trucks, Schlegel, Scuseria, Robb,
Cheeseman, Scalmani, Barone, Mennucci, Petersson, et~al., and
Gaussian}}?><label>Frisch et al.(2013)Frisch, Trucks, Schlegel, Scuseria, Robb,
Cheeseman, Scalmani, Barone, Mennucci, Petersson, et al., and
Gaussian</label><?label Gaussian_09_revE?><mixed-citation>
Frisch, M., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A.,
Cheeseman, J. R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Mennucci, B., and Petersson, G. A.:  Gaussian, Inc., W. C.: Gaussian 09, Revision E.01, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fuentes et~al.(2011)Fuentes, Coe, Green, and McFiggans}}?><label>Fuentes et al.(2011)Fuentes, Coe, Green, and McFiggans</label><?label Fuentes2011?><mixed-citation>Fuentes, E., Coe, H., Green, D., and McFiggans, G.: On the impacts of phytoplankton-derived organic matter on the properties of the primary marine aerosol – Part 2: Composition, hygroscopicity and cloud condensation activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2585–2602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2585-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-2585-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Graus et~al.(2010)Graus, Müller, and Hansel}}?><label>Graus et al.(2010)Graus, Müller, and Hansel</label><?label Graus2010?><mixed-citation>Graus, M., Müller, M., and Hansel, A.: High Resolution PTR-TOF: Quantification
and Formula Confirmation of VOC in Real Time, J.  Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 21, 1037–1044,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2010.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jasms.2010.02.006</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gysel et~al.(2002)Gysel, Weingartner, and Baltensperger}}?><label>Gysel et al.(2002)Gysel, Weingartner, and Baltensperger</label><?label Gysel2002?><mixed-citation>Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Hygroscopicity of Aerosol
Particles at Low Temperatures. 2. Theoretical and Experimental Hygroscopic
Properties of Laboratory Generated Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 63–68, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es010055g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es010055g</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Henschel et~al.(2014{\natexlab{a}})Henschel, Navarro, {Yli-Juuti},
{Kupiainen-M{\"{a}}{\"{a}}tt{\"{a}}}, Olenius, Ortega, Clegg, Kurt{\'{e}}n, Riipinen,
and Vehkam{\"{a}}ki}}?><label>Henschel et al.(2014a)Henschel, Navarro, Yli-Juuti,
Kupiainen-Määttä, Olenius, Ortega, Clegg, Kurtén, Riipinen,
and Vehkamäki</label><?label Henschel_jpca_2014?><mixed-citation>
Henschel, H., Navarro, J. C. A., Yli-Juuti, T.,
Kupiainen-Määttä, O., Olenius, T., Ortega, I. K., Clegg, S. L.,
Kurtén, T., Riipinen, I., and Vehkamäki, H.: Hydration of
Atmospherically Relevant Molecular Clusters: Computational Chemistry and
Classical Thermodynamics, J. Phys. Chem. A., 118, 2599–2611,
2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Henschel et~al.(2014{\natexlab{b}})Henschel, Navarro, Yli-Juuti,
Kupiainen-Määttä, Olenius, Ortega, Clegg, Kurtén, Riipinen, and
Vehkamäki}}?><label>Henschel et al.(2014b)Henschel, Navarro, Yli-Juuti,
Kupiainen-Määttä, Olenius, Ortega, Clegg, Kurtén, Riipinen, and
Vehkamäki</label><?label Henschel2014?><mixed-citation>Henschel, H., Navarro, J. C. A., Yli-Juuti, T., Kupiainen-Määttä, O.,
Olenius, T., Ortega, I. K., Clegg, S. L., Kurtén, T., Riipinen, I., and
Vehkamäki, H.: Hydration of Atmospherically Relevant Molecular Clusters:
Computational Chemistry and Classical Thermodynamics, J. Phys.   Chem. A, 118, 2599–2611, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp500712y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp500712y</ext-link>,
2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Henschel et~al.(2016)Henschel, Kurt{\'{e}}n, and
Vehkam{\"{a}}ki}}?><label>Henschel et al.(2016)Henschel, Kurtén, and
Vehkamäki</label><?label Henschel_jpca_2016?><mixed-citation>
Henschel, H., Kurtén, T., and Vehkamäki, H.: Computational Study on the
Effect of Hydration on New Particle Formation in the Sulfuric Acid/Ammonia
and Sulfuric Acid/Dimethylamine Systems, J. Phys. Chem. A., 120, 1886–1896,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hoffmann et~al.(2016)Hoffmann, Tilgner, Schr{\"{o}}dner, Br{\"{a}}uer,
Wolke, and Herrmann}}?><label>Hoffmann et al.(2016)Hoffmann, Tilgner, Schrödner, Bräuer,
Wolke, and Herrmann</label><?label Hoffmann2016?><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, E. H., Tilgner, A., Schrödner, R., Bräuer, P., Wolke, R., and
Herrmann, H.: An advanced modeling study on the impacts and atmospheric
implications of multiphase dimethyl sulfide chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 11776–11781,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606320113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1606320113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hopkins et~al.(2016)Hopkins, Bell, Yang, Suggett, and
Steinke}}?><label>Hopkins et al.(2016)Hopkins, Bell, Yang, Suggett, and
Steinke</label><?label Hopkins2016?><mixed-citation>
Hopkins, F. E., Bell, T. G., Yang, M., Suggett, D. J., and Steinke, M.: Air
exposure of coral is a significant source of dimethylsulfide (DMS) to the
atmosphere, Sci. Rep., 6, 1–11, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{IPCC(2021)}}?><label>IPCC(2021)</label><?label IPCC2021?><mixed-citation>IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2391 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jimenez et~al.(2009)Jimenez, Canagaratna, Donahue, Prevot, Zhang,
Kroll, DeCarlo, Allan, Coe, Ng, Aiken, Docherty, Ulbrich, Grieshop, Robinson,
Duplissy, Smith, Wilson, Lanz, Hueglin, Sun, Tian, Laaksonen, Raatikainen,
Rautiainen, Vaattovaara, Ehn, Kulmala, Tomlinson, Collins, Cubison, null
null, Dunlea, Huffman, Onasch, Alfarra, Williams, Bower, Kondo, Schneider,
Drewnick, Borrmann, Weimer, Demerjian, Salcedo, Cottrell, Griffin, Takami,
Miyoshi, Hatakeyama, Shimono, Sun, Zhang, Dzepina, Kimmel, Sueper, Jayne,
Herndon, Trimborn, Williams, Wood, Middlebrook, Kolb, Baltensperger, and
Worsnop}}?><label>Jimenez et al.(2009)Jimenez, Canagaratna, Donahue, Prevot, Zhang,
Kroll, DeCarlo, Allan, Coe, Ng, Aiken, Docherty, Ulbrich, Grieshop, Robinson,
Duplissy, Smith, Wilson, Lanz, Hueglin, Sun, Tian, Laaksonen, Raatikainen,
Rautiainen, Vaattovaara, Ehn, Kulmala, Tomlinson, Collins, Cubison, null
null, Dunlea, Huffman, Onasch, Alfarra, Williams, Bower, Kondo, Schneider,
Drewnick, Borrmann, Weimer, Demerjian, Salcedo, Cottrell, Griffin, Takami,
Miyoshi, Hatakeyama, Shimono, Sun, Zhang, Dzepina, Kimmel, Sueper, Jayne,
Herndon, Trimborn, Williams, Wood, Middlebrook, Kolb, Baltensperger, and
Worsnop</label><?label Jimenez2009?><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun,
Y. L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
null null, Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R.,
Williams, P. I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann,
S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R.,
Takami, A., Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang,
Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C.,
Trimborn, A. M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb,
C. E., Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols
in the Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Johnson et~al.(2004)Johnson, Ristovski, and Morawska}}?><label>Johnson et al.(2004)Johnson, Ristovski, and Morawska</label><?label Johnson2004?><mixed-citation>Johnson, G., Ristovski, Z., and Morawska, L.: Method for measuring the
hygroscopic behaviour of lower volatility fractions in an internally mixed
aerosol, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 443–455,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.008</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{J{\"{o}}rgensen et~al.(2013)J{\"{o}}rgensen, Jensen, Kjaergaard, and
Anglada}}?><label>Jörgensen et al.(2013)Jörgensen, Jensen, Kjaergaard, and
Anglada</label><?label Jorgensen_pccp_2013?><mixed-citation>
Jörgensen, S., Jensen, C., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Anglada, J. M.: The
Gas-phase Reaction of Methane Sulfonic Acid with the Hydroxyl Radical Without
and With Water Vapor, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 5140–5150, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kerminen et~al.(2018)Kerminen, Chen, Vakkari, Petäjä, Kulmala, and
Bianchi}}?><label>Kerminen et al.(2018)Kerminen, Chen, Vakkari, Petäjä, Kulmala, and
Bianchi</label><?label Kerminen2018?><mixed-citation>Kerminen, V.-M., Chen, X., Vakkari, V., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Bianchi,
F.: Atmospheric new particle formation and growth: review of field
observations, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 103003,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadf3c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aadf3c</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Keskinen et~al.(2011)Keskinen, Romakkaniemi, Jaatinen, Miettinen,
Saukko, Jorma, Mäkelä, Virtanen, Smith, and Laaksonen}}?><label>Keskinen et al.(2011)Keskinen, Romakkaniemi, Jaatinen, Miettinen,
Saukko, Jorma, Mäkelä, Virtanen, Smith, and Laaksonen</label><?label Keskinen2011?><mixed-citation>Keskinen, H., Romakkaniemi, S., Jaatinen, A., Miettinen, P., Saukko, E., Jorma,
J., Mäkelä, J. M., Virtanen, A., Smith, J. N., and Laaksonen, A.: On-Line
Characterization of Morphology and Water Adsorption on Fumed Silica
Nanoparticles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45, 1441–1447,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.597459" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.597459</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kildgaard et~al.(2018{\natexlab{a}})Kildgaard, Mikkelsen, Bilde, and
Elm}}?><label>Kildgaard et al.(2018a)Kildgaard, Mikkelsen, Bilde, and
Elm</label><?label Kildgaard_jpca_2018a?><mixed-citation>
Kildgaard, J. V., Mikkelsen, K. V., Bilde, M., and Elm, J.: Hydration of
Atmospheric Molecular Clusters: A New Method for Systematic Configurational
Sampling, J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 5026–5036, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kildgaard et~al.(2018{\natexlab{b}})Kildgaard, Mikkelsen, Bilde, and
Elm}}?><label>Kildgaard et al.(2018b)Kildgaard, Mikkelsen, Bilde, and
Elm</label><?label Kildgaard_jpca_2018b?><mixed-citation>
Kildgaard, J. V., Mikkelsen, K. V., Bilde, M., and Elm, J.: Hydration of
Atmospheric Molecular Clusters II: Organic Acid-Water Clusters, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 122, 8549–8556, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{King et~al.(2012)King, Butcher, Rosenoern, Coz, Lieke, De~Leeuw,
Nilsson, and Bilde}}?><label>King et al.(2012)King, Butcher, Rosenoern, Coz, Lieke, De Leeuw,
Nilsson, and Bilde</label><?label King2012?><mixed-citation>King, S., Butcher, A., Rosenoern, T., Coz, E., Lieke, K., De Leeuw, G.,
Nilsson, E., and Bilde, M.: Investigating primary marine aerosol properties:
CCN activity of sea salt and mixed inorganic-organic particles, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 46, 10405–10412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es300574u" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es300574u</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kristensen et~al.(2017)Kristensen, Jensen, Glasius, and
Bilde}}?><label>Kristensen et al.(2017)Kristensen, Jensen, Glasius, and
Bilde</label><?label Kristensen2017?><mixed-citation>Kristensen, K., Jensen, L., Glasius, M., and Bilde, M.: The effect of sub-zero
temperature on the formation and composition of secondary organic aerosol
from ozonolysis of alpha-pinene, Environ. Sci., 19, 1220–1234, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c7em00231a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c7em00231a</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kulmala et~al.(2012)Kulmala, Petäjä, Nieminen, Sipilä, Manninen,
Lehtipalo, Dal~Maso, Aalto, Junninen, Paasonen, Riipinen, Lehtinen,
Laaksonen, and Kerminen}}?><label>Kulmala et al.(2012)Kulmala, Petäjä, Nieminen, Sipilä, Manninen,
Lehtipalo, Dal Maso, Aalto, Junninen, Paasonen, Riipinen, Lehtinen,
Laaksonen, and Kerminen</label><?label Kulmala2012?><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Nieminen, T., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H., Lehtipalo,
K., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P., Riipinen, I.,
Lehtinen, K., Laaksonen, A., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Measurement of the
nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles, Nat. Protoc., 7, 1651–1667,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nprot.2012.091</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kulmala et~al.(2013)Kulmala, Kontkanen, Junninen, Lehtipalo,
Manninen, Nieminen, Pet{\"{a}}j{\"{a}}, Sipil{\"{a}}, Schobesberger, Rantala, and
{et al.}}}?><label>Kulmala et al.(2013)Kulmala, Kontkanen, Junninen, Lehtipalo,
Manninen, Nieminen, Petäjä, Sipilä, Schobesberger, Rantala, and
et al.</label><?label Kulmala_science?><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E.,
Nieminen, T., Petäjä, T., Sipilä, M., Schobesberger, S., Rantala,
P., et al.: Direct Observations of Atmospheric Aerosol Nucleation,
Science, 339, 943–946, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lehtinen and Kulmala(2003)}}?><label>Lehtinen and Kulmala(2003)</label><?label Lehtinen2003?><mixed-citation>Lehtinen, K. E. J. and Kulmala, M.: A model for particle formation and growth in the atmosphere with molecular resolution in size, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 251–257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-251-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-251-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lehtipalo et~al.(2014)Lehtipalo, Lepp{\"{a}}, Kontkanen, Kangasluoma,
Franchin, Wimnner, Schobesberger, Junninen, Pet{\"{a}}j{\"{a}}, Sipil{\"{a}}
et~al.}}?><label>Lehtipalo et al.(2014)Lehtipalo, Leppä, Kontkanen, Kangasluoma,
Franchin, Wimnner, Schobesberger, Junninen, Petäjä, Sipilä
et al.</label><?label Lehtipalo2014?><mixed-citation>
Lehtipalo, K., Leppä, J., Kontkanen, J., Kangasluoma, J., Franchin, A.,
Wimnner, D., Schobesberger, S., Junninen, H., Petäjä, T., Sipilä,
M., et al.: Methods for determining particle size distribution and growth
rates between 1 and 3 nm using the Particle Size Magnifier, Boreal
Environ. Res.,  19 (suppl. B), 215–236, ISSN: 1797-2469, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Leverentz et~al.(2013)Leverentz, Siepmann, Truhlar, Loukonen, and
Vehkam{\"{a}}ki}}?><label>Leverentz et al.(2013)Leverentz, Siepmann, Truhlar, Loukonen, and
Vehkamäki</label><?label Leverentz_jpca_2013?><mixed-citation>
Leverentz, H. R., Siepmann, J. I., Truhlar, D. G., Loukonen, V., and
Vehkamäki, H.: Energetics of Atmospherically Implicated Clusters Made of
Sulfuric Acid, Ammonia, and Dimethyl Amine, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117,
3819–3825, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lewis and Schwartz(2004)}}?><label>Lewis and Schwartz(2004)</label><?label Schwartz2004?><mixed-citation>
Lewis, E. and Schwartz, S.: Sea Salt Aerosol Production: Mechanisms, Methods,
Measurements and Models, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, ISBN: 9780875904177, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Li et~al.(2018)Li, Karu, Brenninkmeijer, Fischer, Lelieveld, and
Williams}}?><label>Li et al.(2018)Li, Karu, Brenninkmeijer, Fischer, Lelieveld, and
Williams</label><?label Li2018?><mixed-citation>Li, M., Karu, E., Brenninkmeijer, C., Fischer, H., Lelieveld, J., and Williams,
J.: Tropospheric OH and stratospheric OH and Cl concentrations determined
from CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Cl, and SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, 1–7, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et~al.(2018)Liu, Nyord, Rong, and Feilberg}}?><label>Liu et al.(2018)Liu, Nyord, Rong, and Feilberg</label><?label Liu2018?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Nyord, T., Rong, L., and Feilberg, A.: Real-time quantification of
emissions of volatile organic compounds from land spreading of pig slurry
measured by PTR-MS and wind tunnels, Sci. Total Environ., 639,
1079–1087, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.149" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.149</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lopez-Yglesias et~al.(2014)Lopez-Yglesias, Yeung, Dey, Brechtel, and
Chan}}?><label>Lopez-Yglesias et al.(2014)Lopez-Yglesias, Yeung, Dey, Brechtel, and
Chan</label><?label Lopez2014?><mixed-citation>Lopez-Yglesias, X. F., Yeung, M. C., Dey, S. E., Brechtel, F. J., and Chan,
C. K.: Performance Evaluation of the Brechtel Mfg. Humidified Tandem
Differential Mobility Analyzer (BMI HTDMA) for Studying Hygroscopic
Properties of Aerosol Particles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 48,
969–980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.952366" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2014.952366</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Manninen et~al.(2010)Manninen, Nieminen, Asmi, Gagn\'{e}, H\"{a}kkinen,
Lehtipalo, Aalto, Vana, Mirme, Mirme, H\~{o}rrak, Plass-D\"{u}lmer, Stange, Kiss,
Hoffer, T\"{o}rÅ‘, Moerman, Henzing, de~Leeuw, Brinkenberg, Kouvarakis,
Bougiatioti, Mihalopoulos, O'Dowd, Ceburnis, Arneth, Svenningsson,
Swietlicki, Tarozzi, Decesari, Facchini, Birmili, Sonntag, Wiedensohler,
Boulon, Sellegri, Laj, Gysel, Bukowiecki, Weingartner, Wehrle, Laaksonen,
Hamed, Joutsensaari, Pet\"{a}j\"{a}, Kerminen, and Kulmala}}?><label>Manninen et al.(2010)Manninen, Nieminen, Asmi, Gagné, Häkkinen,
Lehtipalo, Aalto, Vana, Mirme, Mirme, Hõrrak, Plass-Dülmer, Stange, Kiss,
Hoffer, TörÅ‘, Moerman, Henzing, de Leeuw, Brinkenberg, Kouvarakis,
Bougiatioti, Mihalopoulos, O'Dowd, Ceburnis, Arneth, Svenningsson,
Swietlicki, Tarozzi, Decesari, Facchini, Birmili, Sonntag, Wiedensohler,
Boulon, Sellegri, Laj, Gysel, Bukowiecki, Weingartner, Wehrle, Laaksonen,
Hamed, Joutsensaari, Petäjä, Kerminen, and Kulmala</label><?label Manninen2010?><mixed-citation>Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Asmi, E., Gagné, S., Häkkinen, S., Lehtipalo, K., Aalto, P., Vana, M., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Hõrrak, U., Plass-Dülmer, C., Stange, G., Kiss, G., Hoffer, A., Törő, N., Moerman, M., Henzing, B., de Leeuw, G., Brinkenberg, M., Kouvarakis, G. N., Bougiatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Arneth, A., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tarozzi, L., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Birmili, W., Sonntag, A., Wiedensohler, A., Boulon, J., Sellegri, K., Laj, P., Gysel, M., Bukowiecki, N., Weingartner, E., Wehrle, G., Laaksonen, A., Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.: EUCAARI ion spectrometer measurements at 12 European sites – analysis of new particle formation events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7907–7927, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mardyukov and Schreiner(2018)}}?><label>Mardyukov and Schreiner(2018)</label><?label Mardyukov2018?><mixed-citation>
Mardyukov, A. and Schreiner, P. R.: Atmospherically Relevant Radicals Derived
from the Oxidation of Dimethyl Sulfide, Acc. Chem. Res., 51, 475–483, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Modini et~al.(2010)Modini, Johnson, He, and Ristovski}}?><label>Modini et al.(2010)Modini, Johnson, He, and Ristovski</label><?label Modini2010?><mixed-citation>Modini, R. L., Johnson, G. R., He, C., and Ristovski, Z. D.: Observation of the
suppression of water uptake by marine particles, Atmos. Res., 98,
219–228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.03.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.03.025</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Moore et~al.(2010)Moore, Nenes, and Medina}}?><label>Moore et al.(2010)Moore, Nenes, and Medina</label><?label Moore2010?><mixed-citation>Moore, R. H., Nenes, A., and Medina, J.: Scanning Mobility CCN Analysis—A
Method for Fast Measurements of Size-Resolved CCN Distributions and
Activation Kinetics, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44, 861–871,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.498715" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.498715</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Myllys et~al.(2016)Myllys, Elm, and Kurt{\'{e}}n}}?><label>Myllys et al.(2016)Myllys, Elm, and Kurtén</label><?label Myllys_ctc_2016?><mixed-citation>
Myllys, N., Elm, J., and Kurtén, T.: Density Functional Theory Basis Set
Convergence of Sulfuric Acid-Containing Molecular Clusters, Comp. Theor.
Chem., 1098, 1–12, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Neese(2012)}}?><label>Neese(2012)</label><?label Orca?><mixed-citation>Neese, F.:, wIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.,  2, 73–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.81" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wcms.81</ext-link>
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nguyen et~al.(2017)Nguyen, Kjær, Kling, Boesen, and
Bilde}}?><label>Nguyen et al.(2017)Nguyen, Kjær, Kling, Boesen, and
Bilde</label><?label Nguyen2017?><mixed-citation>Nguyen, Q. T., Kjær, K. H., Kling, K. I., Boesen, T., and Bilde, M.: Impact of
fatty acid coating on the CCN activity of sea salt particles, Tellus B, 69, 1304064,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2017.1304064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/16000889.2017.1304064</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nilsson et~al.(2001)Nilsson, Rannik, Swietlicki, Leck, Aalto, Zhou,
and Norman}}?><label>Nilsson et al.(2001)Nilsson, Rannik, Swietlicki, Leck, Aalto, Zhou,
and Norman</label><?label Nilsson2001?><mixed-citation>Nilsson, E. D., Rannik, U., Swietlicki, E., Leck, C., Aalto, P. P., Zhou, J.,
and Norman, M.: Turbulent aerosol fluxes over the Arctic Ocean: 2.
Wind-driven sources from the sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 32139–32154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900747" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900747</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ovadnevaite et~al.(2011)Ovadnevaite, Ceburnis, Martucci, Bialek,
Monahan, Rinaldi, Facchini, Berresheim, Worsnop, and
O'Dowd}}?><label>Ovadnevaite et al.(2011)Ovadnevaite, Ceburnis, Martucci, Bialek,
Monahan, Rinaldi, Facchini, Berresheim, Worsnop, and
O'Dowd</label><?label Ovadnevaite2011?><mixed-citation>Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Martucci, G., Bialek, J., Monahan, C., Rinaldi,
M., Facchini, M. C., Berresheim, H., Worsnop, D. R., and O'Dowd, C.: Primary
marine organic aerosol: A dichotomy of low hygroscopicity and high CCN
activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L21806,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048869" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL048869</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pajunoja et~al.(2015)Pajunoja, Lambe, Hakala, Rastak, Cummings,
Brogan, Hao, Paramonov, Hong, Prisle, Malila, Romakkaniemi, Lehtinen,
Laaksonen, Kulmala, Massoli, Onasch, Donahue, Riipinen, Davidovits, Worsnop,
Petäjä, and Virtanen}}?><label>Pajunoja et al.(2015)Pajunoja, Lambe, Hakala, Rastak, Cummings,
Brogan, Hao, Paramonov, Hong, Prisle, Malila, Romakkaniemi, Lehtinen,
Laaksonen, Kulmala, Massoli, Onasch, Donahue, Riipinen, Davidovits, Worsnop,
Petäjä, and Virtanen</label><?label Pajunoja2015?><mixed-citation>Pajunoja, A., Lambe, A. T., Hakala, J., Rastak, N., Cummings, M. J., Brogan,
J. F., Hao, L., Paramonov, M., Hong, J., Prisle, N. L., Malila, J.,
Romakkaniemi, S., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kulmala, M., Massoli,
P., Onasch, T. B., Donahue, N. M., Riipinen, I., Davidovits, P., Worsnop,
D. R., Petäjä, T., and Virtanen, A.: Adsorptive uptake of water by
semisolid secondary organic aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
3063–3068, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL063142</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Peng and Chan(2001)}}?><label>Peng and Chan(2001)</label><?label Peng2001?><mixed-citation>Peng, C. and Chan, C. K.: The water cycles of water-soluble organic salts of
atmospheric importance, Atmos. Environ., 35, 1183–1192,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00426-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00426-X</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Petters and Kreidenweis(2007)}}?><label>Petters and Kreidenweis(2007)</label><?label Petters2007?><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pieber et~al.(2016)Pieber, El~Haddad, Slowik, Canagaratna, Jayne,
Platt, Bozzetti, Daellenbach, Fr{\"{o}}hlich, Vlachou, Klein, Dommen,
Miljevic, Jim{\'{e}}nez, Worsnop, Baltensperger, and
Pr{\'{e}}v{\^{o}}t}}?><label>Pieber et al.(2016)Pieber, El Haddad, Slowik, Canagaratna, Jayne,
Platt, Bozzetti, Daellenbach, Fröhlich, Vlachou, Klein, Dommen,
Miljevic, Jiménez, Worsnop, Baltensperger, and
Prévôt</label><?label Pieber2016?><mixed-citation>Pieber, S. M., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T.,
Platt, S. M., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R., Fröhlich, R., Vlachou,
A., Klein, F., Dommen, J., Miljevic, B., Jiménez, J. L., Worsnop,
D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Inorganic Salt
Interference on CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Aerodyne AMS and ACSM Organic Aerosol Composition
Studies, Environ. Sci. Technol., 10494–10503
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b01035</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Prather et~al.(2013)Prather, Bertram, Grassian, Deane, Stokes,
DeMott, Aluwihare, Palenik, Azam, Seinfeld, Moffet, Molina, Cappa, Geiger,
Roberts, Russell, Ault, Baltrusaitis, Collins, Corrigan, Cuadra-Rodriguez,
Ebben, Forestieri, Guasco, Hersey, Kim, Lambert, Modini, Mui, Pedler, Ruppel,
Ryder, Schoepp, Sullivan, and Zhao}}?><label>Prather et al.(2013)Prather, Bertram, Grassian, Deane, Stokes,
DeMott, Aluwihare, Palenik, Azam, Seinfeld, Moffet, Molina, Cappa, Geiger,
Roberts, Russell, Ault, Baltrusaitis, Collins, Corrigan, Cuadra-Rodriguez,
Ebben, Forestieri, Guasco, Hersey, Kim, Lambert, Modini, Mui, Pedler, Ruppel,
Ryder, Schoepp, Sullivan, and Zhao</label><?label Prather2013?><mixed-citation>Prather, K., Bertram, T., Grassian, V., Deane, G., Stokes, M., DeMott, P.,
Aluwihare, L., Palenik, B., Azam, F., Seinfeld, J., Moffet, R., Molina, M.,
Cappa, C., Geiger, F., Roberts, G., Russell, L., Ault, A., Baltrusaitis, J.,
Collins, D., Corrigan, C., Cuadra-Rodriguez, L., Ebben, C., Forestieri, S.,
Guasco, T., Hersey, S., Kim, M., Lambert, W., Modini, R., Mui, W., Pedler,
B., Ruppel, M., Ryder, O., Schoepp, N., Sullivan, R., and Zhao, D.: Bringing
the ocean into the laboratory to probe the chemical complexity of sea spray
aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 7550–7555, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300262110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1300262110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Quinn and Bates(2011)}}?><label>Quinn and Bates(2011)</label><?label Quinn2011?><mixed-citation>Quinn, P. and Bates, T.: The case against climate regulation via oceanic
phytoplankton sulphur emissions, Nature, 480, 51–56,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10580" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature10580</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rastak et~al.(2017)Rastak, Pajunoja, Acosta~Navarro, Ma, Song,
Partridge, Kirkevåg, Leong, Hu, Taylor, Lambe, Cerully, Bougiatioti, Liu,
Krejci, Petäjä, Percival, Davidovits, Worsnop, Ekman, Nenes, Martin,
Jimenez, Collins, Topping, Bertram, Zuend, Virtanen, and
Riipinen}}?><label>Rastak et al.(2017)Rastak, Pajunoja, Acosta Navarro, Ma, Song,
Partridge, Kirkevåg, Leong, Hu, Taylor, Lambe, Cerully, Bougiatioti, Liu,
Krejci, Petäjä, Percival, Davidovits, Worsnop, Ekman, Nenes, Martin,
Jimenez, Collins, Topping, Bertram, Zuend, Virtanen, and
Riipinen</label><?label Rastak2017?><mixed-citation>Rastak, N., Pajunoja, A., Acosta Navarro, J. C., Ma, J., Song, M., Partridge,
D. G., Kirkevåg, A., Leong, Y., Hu, W. W., Taylor, N. F., Lambe, A.,
Cerully, K., Bougiatioti, A., Liu, P., Krejci, R., Petäjä, T., Percival,
C., Davidovits, P., Worsnop, D. R., Ekman, A. M. L., Nenes, A., Martin, S.,
Jimenez, J. L., Collins, D. R., Topping, D., Bertram, A. K., Zuend, A.,
Virtanen, A., and Riipinen, I.: Microphysical explanation of the RH-dependent
water affinity of biogenic organic aerosol and its importance for climate,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 5167–5177,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL073056</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riplinger and Neese(2013)}}?><label>Riplinger and Neese(2013)</label><?label DLPNO_CCSD?><mixed-citation>
Riplinger, C. and Neese, F.: An Efficient and Near Linear Scaling Pair Natural
Orbital Based Local Coupled Cluster Method, J. Chem. Phys., 138, 034106, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4773581,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riplinger et~al.(2013)Riplinger, Sandhoefer, Hansen, and
Neese}}?><label>Riplinger et al.(2013)Riplinger, Sandhoefer, Hansen, and
Neese</label><?label DLPNO_CCSD(T)?><mixed-citation>Riplinger, C., Sandhoefer, B., Hansen, A., and Neese, F.: Natural Triple
Excitations in Local Coupled Cluster Calculations with Pair Natural Orbitals,
J. Chem. Phys., 139, 134101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4821834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4821834</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Roberts and Nenes(2005)}}?><label>Roberts and Nenes(2005)</label><?label Roberts2005?><mixed-citation>Roberts, G. C. and Nenes, A.: A Continuous-Flow Streamwise Thermal-Gradient
CCN Chamber for Atmospheric Measurements, Aerosol Sci. Technol.,
39, 206–221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290913988" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868290913988</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rosati(2022)}}?><label>Rosati(2022)</label><?label Rosati2022?><mixed-citation>Rosati, B.: Data set containing raw and processed experimental data for the manuscript: Hygroscopicity and CCN potential of DMS-derived aerosol particles, Science Data [data set, code], <uri>https://sciencedata.dk/shared/4f1826ab4877ee70a2388cd519b3039a</uri>,                     last of access: 21 September 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rosati et~al.(2020)Rosati, Paul, Iversen, Massling, and
Bilde}}?><label>Rosati et al.(2020)Rosati, Paul, Iversen, Massling, and
Bilde</label><?label Rosati2020?><mixed-citation>Rosati, B., Paul, A., Iversen, E. M., Massling, A., and Bilde, M.: Reconciling
atmospheric water uptake by hydrate forming salts, Environ. Sci.-Proc.  Im., 22, 1759–1767, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00179A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D0EM00179A</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rosati et~al.(2021a)Rosati, Christiansen, Wollesen~de Jonge, Roldin,
Jensen, Wang, Moosakutty, Thomsen, Salomonsen, Hyttinen, Elm, Feilberg,
Glasius, and Bilde}}?><label>Rosati et al.(2021a)Rosati, Christiansen, Wollesen de Jonge, Roldin,
Jensen, Wang, Moosakutty, Thomsen, Salomonsen, Hyttinen, Elm, Feilberg,
Glasius, and Bilde</label><?label Rosati2021a?><mixed-citation>Rosati, B., Christiansen, S., Wollesen de Jonge, R., Roldin, P., Jensen, M. M.,
Wang, K., Moosakutty, S. P., Thomsen, D., Salomonsen, C., Hyttinen, N., Elm,
J., Feilberg, A., Glasius, M., and Bilde, M.: New Particle Formation and
Growth from Dimethyl Sulfide Oxidation by Hydroxyl Radicals, ACS Earth
Space Chem., 5, 801–811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00333" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00333</ext-link>, 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rosati et~al.(2021b)Rosati, Christiansen, Dinesen, Roldin, Massling,
E, and Bilde}}?><label>Rosati et al.(2021b)Rosati, Christiansen, Dinesen, Roldin, Massling,
E, and Bilde</label><?label Rosati2021b?><mixed-citation>Rosati, B., Christiansen, S., Dinesen, A., Roldin, P., Massling, A., E, D. N.,
and Bilde, M.: The impact of atmospheric oxidation on hygroscopicity and
cloud droplet activation of inorganic sea spray aerosol, Sci. Rep.,
11, 10008, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89346-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-021-89346-6</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schmale and Baccarini(2021)}}?><label>Schmale and Baccarini(2021)</label><?label Schmale2021?><mixed-citation>Schmale, J. and Baccarini, A.: Progress in Unraveling Atmospheric New Particle
Formation and Growth Across the Arctic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
e2021GL094198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094198" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL094198</ext-link>,
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schmitz and Elm(2020)}}?><label>Schmitz and Elm(2020)</label><?label Schmitz_acs_omega_2020?><mixed-citation>
Schmitz, G. and Elm, J.: Assessment of the DLPNO binding energies of strongly
non-covalent bonded atmospheric molecular clusters, ACS Omega, 5, 7601–7612,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Seinfeld and Pandis(2016)}}?><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(2016)</label><?label Seinfeld2016?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. and Pandis, S.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air
Pollution to Climate Change, 3rd Edition, Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., ISBN: 978-1-118-94740-1, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sekimoto et~al.(2017)Sekimoto, Li, Yuan, Koss, Coggon, Warneke, and
{de Gouw}}}?><label>Sekimoto et al.(2017)Sekimoto, Li, Yuan, Koss, Coggon, Warneke, and
de Gouw</label><?label Sekimoto2017?><mixed-citation>Sekimoto, K., Li, S.-M., Yuan, B., Koss, A., Coggon, M., Warneke, C., and de
Gouw, J.: Calculation of the sensitivity of proton-transfer-reaction mass
spectrometry (PTR-MS) for organic trace gases using molecular properties,
International J. Mass Spectrom., 421, 71–94,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.006</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Smith(2007)}}?><label>Smith(2007)</label><?label Smith2007?><mixed-citation>
Smith, M.: Sea-salt particles and the CLAW hypothesis, Environ. Chem.,
4, 391–395, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Spracklen et~al.(2006)Spracklen, Carslaw, Kulmala, Kerminen, Mann,
and Sihto}}?><label>Spracklen et al.(2006)Spracklen, Carslaw, Kulmala, Kerminen, Mann,
and Sihto</label><?label Spracklen2006?><mixed-citation>Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Mann, G. W., and Sihto, S.-L.: The contribution of boundary layer nucleation events to total particle concentrations on regional and global scales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5631–5648, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5631-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-5631-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Stewart(2007)}}?><label>Stewart(2007)</label><?label PM6?><mixed-citation>
Stewart, J. J. P.: Optimization of Parameters for Semiempirical Methods. V.
Modification of NDDO Approximations and Application to 70 Elements, J. Molec.
Model., 13, 1173–1213, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Swietlicki et~al.(2008)Swietlicki, Hansson, Hämeri, Svenningsson,
Massling, Mcfiggans, Mcmurry, Petäjä, Tunved, Gysel, Topping, Weingartner,
Baltensperger, Rissler, Wiedensohler, and Kulmala}}?><label>Swietlicki et al.(2008)Swietlicki, Hansson, Hämeri, Svenningsson,
Massling, Mcfiggans, Mcmurry, Petäjä, Tunved, Gysel, Topping, Weingartner,
Baltensperger, Rissler, Wiedensohler, and Kulmala</label><?label Swietlicki2008?><mixed-citation>Swietlicki, E., Hansson, H.-C., Hämeri, K., Svenningsson, B., Massling, A.,
Mcfiggans, G., Mcmurry, P., Petäjä, T., Tunved, P., Gysel, M., Topping, D.,
Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Rissler, J., Wiedensohler, A., and
Kulmala, M.: Hygroscopic properties of submicrometer atmospheric aerosol
particles measured with H-TDMA instruments in various environments – A
review, Tellus B, 60, 432–469,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00350.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00350.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Taipale et~al.(2008)Taipale, Ruuskanen, Rinne, Kajos, Hakola, Pohja,
and Kulmala}}?><label>Taipale et al.(2008)Taipale, Ruuskanen, Rinne, Kajos, Hakola, Pohja,
and Kulmala</label><?label Taipale2008?><mixed-citation>Taipale, R., Ruuskanen, T. M., Rinne, J., Kajos, M. K., Hakola, H., Pohja, T., and Kulmala, M.: Technical Note: Quantitative long-term measurements of VOC concentrations by PTR-MS – measurement, calibration, and volume mixing ratio calculation methods, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6681–6698, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6681-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-6681-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tang et~al.(2019)Tang, Guo, Bai, Huang, Wu, Wang, Zhang, Ding, Hu,
and Wang}}?><label>Tang et al.(2019)Tang, Guo, Bai, Huang, Wu, Wang, Zhang, Ding, Hu,
and Wang</label><?label Tang2019?><mixed-citation>
Tang, M., Guo, L., Bai, Y., Huang, R.-J., Wu, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, G., Ding,
X., Hu, M., and Wang, X.: Impacts of methanesulfonate on the cloud
condensation nucleation activity of sea salt aerosol, Atmos.  Environ., 201, 13–17, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tikkanen et~al.(2018)Tikkanen, Väisänen, Hao, Holopainen, Wang,
Lehtinen, Virtanen, and Yli-Juuti}}?><label>Tikkanen et al.(2018)Tikkanen, Väisänen, Hao, Holopainen, Wang,
Lehtinen, Virtanen, and Yli-Juuti</label><?label Tikkanen2018?><mixed-citation>Tikkanen, O.-P., Väisänen, O., Hao, L., Holopainen, E., Wang, H., Lehtinen,
K. E. J., Virtanen, A., and Yli-Juuti, T.: Hygroscopicity of
dimethylaminium-, sulfate-, and ammonium-containing nanoparticles, Aerosol
Sci. Technol., 52, 971–983, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1484071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2018.1484071</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tomicic et~al.(2018)Tomicic, B{\o}dker~Enghoff, and
Svensmark}}?><label>Tomicic et al.(2018)Tomicic, Bødker Enghoff, and
Svensmark</label><?label Tomicic_acp_2018?><mixed-citation>Tomicic, M., Bødker Enghoff, M., and Svensmark, H.: Experimental study of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol nucleation at high ionization levels, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5921–5930, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5921-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-5921-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Topping et~al.(2016)Topping, Barley, Bane, Higham, Aumont, Dingle,
and McFiggans}}?><label>Topping et al.(2016)Topping, Barley, Bane, Higham, Aumont, Dingle,
and McFiggans</label><?label Topping2016?><mixed-citation>Topping, D., Barley, M., Bane, M. K., Higham, N., Aumont, B., Dingle, N., and McFiggans, G.: UManSysProp v1.0: an online and open-source facility for molecular property prediction and atmospheric aerosol calculations, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 899–914, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-899-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-899-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vallina and Simó(2007)}}?><label>Vallina and Simó(2007)</label><?label Vallina2007?><mixed-citation>
Vallina, S. M. and Simó, R.: Re-visiting the CLAW hypothesis, Environ.  Chem., 4, 384–387, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vanhanen et~al.(2011)Vanhanen, Mikkilä, Lehtipalo, Sipilä,
Manninen, Siivola, Petäjä, and Kulmala}}?><label>Vanhanen et al.(2011)Vanhanen, Mikkilä, Lehtipalo, Sipilä,
Manninen, Siivola, Petäjä, and Kulmala</label><?label Vanhanen2011?><mixed-citation>Vanhanen, J., Mikkilä, J., Lehtipalo, K., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E.,
Siivola, E., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Particle Size Magnifier for
Nano-CN Detection, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45, 533–542,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.547889" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.547889</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Veres et~al.(2020)Veres, Neuman, Bertram, Assaf, Wolfe, Williamson,
Weinzierl, Tilmes, Thompson, Thames, Schroder, Saiz-Lopez, Rollins, Roberts,
Price, Peischl, Nault, M{\o}ller, Miller, Meinardi, Li, Lamarque, Kupc,
Kjaergaard, Kinnison, Jimenez, Jernigan, Hornbrook, Hills, Dollner, Day,
Cuevas, Campuzano-Jost, Burkholder, Bui, Brune, Brown, Brock, Bourgeois,
Blake, Apel, and Ryerson}}?><label>Veres et al.(2020)Veres, Neuman, Bertram, Assaf, Wolfe, Williamson,
Weinzierl, Tilmes, Thompson, Thames, Schroder, Saiz-Lopez, Rollins, Roberts,
Price, Peischl, Nault, Møller, Miller, Meinardi, Li, Lamarque, Kupc,
Kjaergaard, Kinnison, Jimenez, Jernigan, Hornbrook, Hills, Dollner, Day,
Cuevas, Campuzano-Jost, Burkholder, Bui, Brune, Brown, Brock, Bourgeois,
Blake, Apel, and Ryerson</label><?label Veres2020?><mixed-citation>Veres, P. R., Neuman, J. A., Bertram, T. H., Assaf, E., Wolfe, G. M.,
Williamson, C. J., Weinzierl, B., Tilmes, S., Thompson, C. R., Thames, A. B.,
Schroder, J. C., Saiz-Lopez, A., Rollins, A. W., Roberts, J. M., Price, D.,
Peischl, J., Nault, B. A., Møller, K. H., Miller, D. O., Meinardi, S., Li,
Q., Lamarque, J.-F., Kupc, A., Kjaergaard, H. G., Kinnison, D., Jimenez,
J. L., Jernigan, C. M., Hornbrook, R. S., Hills, A., Dollner, M., Day, D. A.,
Cuevas, C. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Burkholder, J., Bui, T. P., Brune, W. H.,
Brown, S. S., Brock, C. A., Bourgeois, I., Blake, D. R., Apel, E. C., and
Ryerson, T. B.: Global airborne sampling reveals a previously unobserved
dimethyl sulfide oxidation mechanism in the marine atmosphere, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 4505–4510,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919344117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1919344117</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Whitehead et~al.(2014)Whitehead, Irwin, Allan, Good, and
McFiggans}}?><label>Whitehead et al.(2014)Whitehead, Irwin, Allan, Good, and
McFiggans</label><?label Whitehead2014?><mixed-citation>Whitehead, J. D., Irwin, M., Allan, J. D., Good, N., and McFiggans, G.: A meta-analysis of particle water uptake reconciliation studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11833–11841, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11833-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11833-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wollesen~de Jonge et~al.(2021)Wollesen~de Jonge, Elm, Rosati,
Christiansen, Hyttinen, L\"{u}demann, Bilde, and Roldin}}?><label>Wollesen de Jonge et al.(2021)Wollesen de Jonge, Elm, Rosati,
Christiansen, Hyttinen, Lüdemann, Bilde, and Roldin</label><?label Wollesen2021?><mixed-citation>Wollesen de Jonge, R., Elm, J., Rosati, B., Christiansen, S., Hyttinen, N., Lüdemann, D., Bilde, M., and Roldin, P.: Secondary aerosol formation from dimethyl sulfide – improved mechanistic understanding based on smog chamber experiments and modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9955–9976, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9955-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-9955-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ye et~al.(2021)Ye, Goss, Isaacman-VanWertz, Zaytsev, Massoli, Lim,
Croteau, Canagaratna, Knopf, Keutsch, Heald, and Kroll}}?><label>Ye et al.(2021)Ye, Goss, Isaacman-VanWertz, Zaytsev, Massoli, Lim,
Croteau, Canagaratna, Knopf, Keutsch, Heald, and Kroll</label><?label Qing2021?><mixed-citation>Ye, Q., Goss, M. B., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Zaytsev, A., Massoli, P., Lim, C.,
Croteau, P., Canagaratna, M., Knopf, D. A., Keutsch, F. N., Heald, C. L., and
Kroll, J. H.: Organic Sulfur Products and Peroxy Radical Isomerization in the
OH Oxidation of Dimethyl Sulfide, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5,
2013–2020, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00108</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yli-Juuti et~al.(2011)Yli-Juuti, Nieminen, Hirsikko, Aalto, Asmi,
H\~{o}rrak, Manninen, Patokoski, Dal~Maso, Pet\"{a}j\"{a}, Rinne, Kulmala, and
Riipinen}}?><label>Yli-Juuti et al.(2011)Yli-Juuti, Nieminen, Hirsikko, Aalto, Asmi,
Hõrrak, Manninen, Patokoski, Dal Maso, Petäjä, Rinne, Kulmala, and
Riipinen</label><?label YliJuuti2011?><mixed-citation>Yli-Juuti, T., Nieminen, T., Hirsikko, A., Aalto, P. P., Asmi, E., Hõrrak, U., Manninen, H. E., Patokoski, J., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T., Rinne, J., Kulmala, M., and Riipinen, I.: Growth rates of nucleation mode particles in Hyytiälä during 2003−2009: variation with particle size, season, data analysis method and ambient conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12865–12886, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12865-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12865-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhao et~al.(2016)Zhao, Buchholz, Kortner, Schlag, Rubach, Fuchs,
Kiendler-Scharr, Tillmann, Wahner, Watne, Hallquist, Flores, Rudich,
Kristensen, Hansen, Glasius, Kourtchev, Kalberer, and Mentel}}?><label>Zhao et al.(2016)Zhao, Buchholz, Kortner, Schlag, Rubach, Fuchs,
Kiendler-Scharr, Tillmann, Wahner, Watne, Hallquist, Flores, Rudich,
Kristensen, Hansen, Glasius, Kourtchev, Kalberer, and Mentel</label><?label Zhao2016?><mixed-citation>Zhao, D. F., Buchholz, A., Kortner, B., Schlag, P., Rubach, F., Fuchs, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Tillmann, R., Wahner, A., Watne, Å. K., Hallquist, M., Flores, J. M., Rudich, Y., Kristensen, K., Hansen, A. M. K., Glasius, M., Kourtchev, I., Kalberer, M., and Mentel, Th. F.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity, droplet growth kinetics, and hygroscopicity of biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic aerosol (SOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1105–1121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1105-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1105-2016</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zheng et~al.(2021)Zheng, Wang, Wood, Jensen, Kuang, McCoy, Matthews,
Mei, Tomlinson, Shilling et~al.}}?><label>Zheng et al.(2021)Zheng, Wang, Wood, Jensen, Kuang, McCoy, Matthews,
Mei, Tomlinson, Shilling et al.</label><?label Zheng2021?><mixed-citation>
Zheng, G., Wang, Y., Wood, R., Jensen, M. P., Kuang, C., McCoy, I. L.,
Matthews, A., Mei, F., Tomlinson, J. M., Shilling, J. E., et al.: New
particle formation in the remote marine boundary layer, Nat. Commun., 12, 1–10, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zuend et~al.(2008)Zuend, Marcolli, Luo, and Peter}}?><label>Zuend et al.(2008)Zuend, Marcolli, Luo, and Peter</label><?label Zuend2008?><mixed-citation>Zuend, A., Marcolli, C., Luo, B. P., and Peter, T.: A thermodynamic model of mixed organic-inorganic aerosols to predict activity coefficients, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4559–4593, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4559-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-4559-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zuend et~al.(2011)Zuend, Marcolli, Booth, Lienhard, Soonsin, Krieger,
Topping, McFiggans, Peter, and Seinfeld}}?><label>Zuend et al.(2011)Zuend, Marcolli, Booth, Lienhard, Soonsin, Krieger,
Topping, McFiggans, Peter, and Seinfeld</label><?label Zuend2011?><mixed-citation>Zuend, A., Marcolli, C., Booth, A. M., Lienhard, D. M., Soonsin, V., Krieger, U. K., Topping, D. O., McFiggans, G., Peter, T., and Seinfeld, J. H.: New and extended parameterization of the thermodynamic model AIOMFAC: calculation of activity coefficients for organic-inorganic mixtures containing carboxyl, hydroxyl, carbonyl, ether, ester, alkenyl, alkyl, and aromatic functional groups, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9155–9206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9155-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9155-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Hygroscopicity and CCN potential of  DMS-derived aerosol particles</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Albu et al.(2006)Albu, Barnes, Becker, Patroescu-Klotz, Mocanu, and
Benter</label><mixed-citation>
Albu, M., Barnes, I., Becker, K. H., Patroescu-Klotz, I., Mocanu, R., and
Benter, T.: Rate coefficients for the gas-phase reaction of OH radicals with
dimethyl sulfide: temperature and O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure dependence, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 8, 728–736, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B512536G" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B512536G</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Andreae(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O.: Ocean–atmosphere Interactions in the Global Biogeochemical
Sulfur Cycle, Mar. Chem., 30, 1–29, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Ayers and Cainey(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Ayers, G. P. and Cainey, J. M.: The CLAW hypothesis: a review of the major
developments, Environ. Chem., 4, 366–374, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Barnes et al.(2006)Barnes, Hjorth, and Mihalopoulos</label><mixed-citation>
Barnes, I., Hjorth, J., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Dimethyl Sulfide and Dimethyl
Sulfoxide and Their Oxidation in the Atmosphere, Chem. Rev., 106,
940–975, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020529+" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020529+</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Beck et al.(2021)Beck, Sarnela, Junninen, Hoppe, Garmash, Bianchi,
Riva, Rose, Peräkylä, Wimmer, Kausiala, Jokinen, Ahonen, Mikkilä, Hakala,
He, Kontkanen, Wolf, Cappelletti, Mazzola, Traversi, Petroselli, Viola,
Vitale, Lange, Massling, Nøjgaard, Krejci, Karlsson, Zieger, Jang, Lee,
Vakkari, Lampilahti, Thakur, Leino, Kangasluoma, Duplissy, Siivola, Marbouti,
Tham, Saiz-Lopez, Petäjä, Ehn, Worsnop, Skov, Kulmala, Kerminen, and
Sipilä</label><mixed-citation>
Beck, L. J., Sarnela, N., Junninen, H., Hoppe, C. J. M., Garmash, O., Bianchi,
F., Riva, M., Rose, C., Peräkylä, O., Wimmer, D., Kausiala, O., Jokinen,
T., Ahonen, L., Mikkilä, J., Hakala, J., He, X.-C., Kontkanen, J., Wolf, K.
K. E., Cappelletti, D., Mazzola, M., Traversi, R., Petroselli, C., Viola,
A. P., Vitale, V., Lange, R., Massling, A., Nøjgaard, J. K., Krejci, R.,
Karlsson, L., Zieger, P., Jang, S., Lee, K., Vakkari, V., Lampilahti, J.,
Thakur, R. C., Leino, K., Kangasluoma, J., Duplissy, E.-M., Siivola, E.,
Marbouti, M., Tham, Y. J., Saiz-Lopez, A., Petäjä, T., Ehn, M., Worsnop,
D. R., Skov, H., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.-M., and Sipilä, M.: Differing
Mechanisms of New Particle Formation at Two Arctic Sites, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091334,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091334" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091334</a>,  2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Berg et al.(1998)Berg, Swietlicki, and Krejci</label><mixed-citation>
Berg, O. H., Swietlicki, E., and Krejci, R.: Hygroscopic growth of aerosol
particles in the marine boundary layer over the Pacific and Southern Oceans
during the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1), J.   Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 16535–16545,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02851" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02851</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Cappellin et al.(2012)Cappellin, Karl, Probst, Ismailova, Winkler,
Soukoulis, Aprea, Märk, Gasperi, and Biasioli</label><mixed-citation>
Cappellin, L., Karl, T., Probst, M., Ismailova, O., Winkler, P. M., Soukoulis,
C., Aprea, E., Märk, T. D., Gasperi, F., and Biasioli, F.: On Quantitative
Determination of Volatile Organic Compound Concentrations Using Proton
Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci.   Technol., 46, 2283–2290, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es203985t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es203985t</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Carpenter et al.(2012)Carpenter, Archer, and Beale</label><mixed-citation>
Carpenter, L. J., Archer, S. D., and Beale, R.: Ocean-atmosphere trace gas
exchange, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6473–6506, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35121H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35121H</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Chai and Head-Gordon(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Chai, J.-D. and Head-Gordon, M.: Long-range Corrected Hybrid Density
Functionals with Damped Atom-atom Dispersion Corrections, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 10, 6615–6620, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Charlson et al.(1987)Charlson, Lovelock, Andreae, and
Warren</label><mixed-citation>
Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., and Warren, S. G.: Oceanic
phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate, Nature, 326,
655–661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/326655a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/326655a0</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Collins et al.(2013)Collins, Ault, Moffet, Ruppel, Cuadra-Rodriguez,
Guasco, Corrigan, Pedler, Azam, Aluwihare, Bertram, Roberts, Grassian, and
Prather</label><mixed-citation>
Collins, D. B., Ault, A. P., Moffet, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Cuadra-Rodriguez,
L. A., Guasco, T. L., Corrigan, C. E., Pedler, B. E., Azam, F., Aluwihare,
L. I., Bertram, T. H., Roberts, G. C., Grassian, V. H., and Prather, K. A.:
Impact of marine biogeochemistry on the chemical mixing state and cloud
forming ability of nascent sea spray aerosol, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 8553–8565,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50598" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50598</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Collins et al.(2016)Collins, Bertram, Sultana, Lee, Axson, and
Prather</label><mixed-citation>
Collins, D. B., Bertram, T. H., Sultana, C. M., Lee, C., Axson, J. L., and
Prather, K. A.: Phytoplankton blooms weakly influence the cloud forming
ability of sea spray aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 9975–9983,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069922" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069922</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Covert et al.(1998)Covert, Gras, Wiedensohler, and
Stratmann</label><mixed-citation>
Covert, D. S., Gras, J. L., Wiedensohler, A., and Stratmann, F.: Comparison of
directly measured CCN with CCN modeled from the number-size distribution in
the marine boundary layer during ACE 1 at Cape Grim, Tasmania, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 16597–16608,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01093</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>DeCarlo et al.(2004)DeCarlo, Slowik, Worsnop, Davidovits, and
Jimenez</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility
and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements, Part 1: Theory, Aerosol Sci.   Technol., 38, 1185–1205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290903907" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290903907</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Decarlo et al.(2006)Decarlo, Kimmel, Trimborn, Northway, Jayne,
Aiken, Gonin, Fuhrer, Horvath, Docherty, Worsnop, and Jimenez</label><mixed-citation>
Decarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-Deployable, High-Resolution, Time-of-Flight
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001213.Analytical" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001213.Analytical</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Ditas et al.(2012)Ditas, Shaw, Siebert, Simmel, Wehner, and
Wiedensohler</label><mixed-citation>
Ditas, F., Shaw, R. A., Siebert, H., Simmel, M., Wehner, B., and Wiedensohler, A.: Aerosols-cloud microphysics-thermodynamics-turbulence: evaluating supersaturation in a marine stratocumulus cloud, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2459–2468, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2459-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2459-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Drewnick et al.(2009)Drewnick, Hings, Alfarra, Prevot, and
Borrmann</label><mixed-citation>
Drewnick, F., Hings, S. S., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., and Borrmann, S.: Aerosol quantification with the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer: detection limits and ionizer background effects, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 33–46, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-33-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-33-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Drewnick et al.(2015)Drewnick, Diesch, Faber, and
Borrmann</label><mixed-citation>
Drewnick, F., Diesch, J.-M., Faber, P., and Borrmann, S.: Aerosol mass spectrometry: particle–vaporizer interactions and their consequences for the measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3811–3830, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3811-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3811-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Duplissy et al.(2016)Duplissy, Merikanto, Franchin, Tsagkogeorgas,
Kangasluoma, Wimmer, Vuollekoski, Schobesberger, Lehtipalo, Flagan, Brus,
Donahue, Vehkamäki, Almeida, Amorim, Barmet, Bianchi, Breitenlechner, Dunne,
Guida, Henschel, Junninen, Kirkby, Kürten, Kupc, Määttänen, Makhmutov,
Mathot, Nieminen, Onnela, Praplan, Riccobono, Rondo, Steiner, Tome, Walther,
Baltensperger, Carslaw, Dommen, Hansel, Petäjä, Sipilä, Stratmann, Vrtala,
Wagner, Worsnop, Curtius, and Kulmala</label><mixed-citation>
Duplissy, J., Merikanto, J., Franchin, A., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Kangasluoma, J.,
Wimmer, D., Vuollekoski, H., Schobesberger, S., Lehtipalo, K., Flagan, R. C.,
Brus, D., Donahue, N. M., Vehkamäki, H., Almeida, J., Amorim, A., Barmet,
P., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Dunne, E. M., Guida, R., Henschel, H.,
Junninen, H., Kirkby, J., Kürten, A., Kupc, A., Määttänen, A., Makhmutov,
V., Mathot, S., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Praplan, A. P., Riccobono, F.,
Rondo, L., Steiner, G., Tome, A., Walther, H., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw,
K. S., Dommen, J., Hansel, A., Petäjä, T., Sipilä, M., Stratmann, F.,
Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Worsnop, D. R., Curtius, J., and Kulmala, M.:
Effect of ions on sulfuric acid-water binary particle formation: 2.
Experimental data and comparison with QC-normalized classical nucleation
theory, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1752–1775,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023539" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023539</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Elm and Kristensen(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Elm, J. and Kristensen, K.: Basis Set Convergence of the Binding Energies of
Strongly Hydrogen-Bonded Atmospheric Clusters, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 19,
1122–1133, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Elm and Mikkelsen(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Elm, J. and Mikkelsen, K. V.: Computational Approaches for Efficiently
Modelling of Small Atmospheric Clusters, Chem. Phys. Lett., 615, 26–29,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Elm et al.(2013)Elm, Bilde, and Mikkelsen</label><mixed-citation>
Elm, J., Bilde, M., and Mikkelsen, K. V.: Assessment of Binding Energies of
Atmopsheric Clusters, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 15, 16442–16445, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Facchini et al.(2008)Facchini, Rinaldi, Decesari, Carbone, Finessi,
Mircea, Fuzzi, Ceburnis, Flanagan, Nilsson, de Leeuw, Martino, Woeltjen, and
O'Dowd</label><mixed-citation>
Facchini, M., Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Carbone, C., Finessi, E., Mircea, M.,
Fuzzi, S., Ceburnis, D., Flanagan, R., Nilsson, E., de Leeuw, G., Martino,
M., Woeltjen, J., and O'Dowd, C.: Primary submicron marine aerosol dominated
by insoluble organic colloids and aggregates, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
35, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034210" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034210</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Fossum et al.(2018)Fossum, Ovadnevaite, Ceburnis, Dall’Osto,
Marullo, Bellacicco, Simó, Liu, Flynn, Zuend et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Fossum, K. N., Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Dall’Osto, M., Marullo, S.,
Bellacicco, M., Simó, R., Liu, D., Flynn, M., Zuend, A., and O’Dowd, C.:
Summertime primary and secondary contributions to Southern Ocean cloud
condensation nuclei, Sci. Rep., 8, 1–14, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Frisch et al.(2013)Frisch, Trucks, Schlegel, Scuseria, Robb,
Cheeseman, Scalmani, Barone, Mennucci, Petersson, et al., and
Gaussian</label><mixed-citation>
Frisch, M., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A.,
Cheeseman, J. R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Mennucci, B., and Petersson, G. A.:  Gaussian, Inc., W. C.: Gaussian 09, Revision E.01, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Fuentes et al.(2011)Fuentes, Coe, Green, and McFiggans</label><mixed-citation>
Fuentes, E., Coe, H., Green, D., and McFiggans, G.: On the impacts of phytoplankton-derived organic matter on the properties of the primary marine aerosol – Part 2: Composition, hygroscopicity and cloud condensation activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2585–2602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2585-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2585-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Graus et al.(2010)Graus, Müller, and Hansel</label><mixed-citation>
Graus, M., Müller, M., and Hansel, A.: High Resolution PTR-TOF: Quantification
and Formula Confirmation of VOC in Real Time, J.  Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 21, 1037–1044,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2010.02.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2010.02.006</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Gysel et al.(2002)Gysel, Weingartner, and Baltensperger</label><mixed-citation>
Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Hygroscopicity of Aerosol
Particles at Low Temperatures. 2. Theoretical and Experimental Hygroscopic
Properties of Laboratory Generated Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 63–68, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es010055g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es010055g</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Henschel et al.(2014a)Henschel, Navarro, Yli-Juuti,
Kupiainen-Määttä, Olenius, Ortega, Clegg, Kurtén, Riipinen,
and Vehkamäki</label><mixed-citation>
Henschel, H., Navarro, J. C. A., Yli-Juuti, T.,
Kupiainen-Määttä, O., Olenius, T., Ortega, I. K., Clegg, S. L.,
Kurtén, T., Riipinen, I., and Vehkamäki, H.: Hydration of
Atmospherically Relevant Molecular Clusters: Computational Chemistry and
Classical Thermodynamics, J. Phys. Chem. A., 118, 2599–2611,
2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Henschel et al.(2014b)Henschel, Navarro, Yli-Juuti,
Kupiainen-Määttä, Olenius, Ortega, Clegg, Kurtén, Riipinen, and
Vehkamäki</label><mixed-citation>
Henschel, H., Navarro, J. C. A., Yli-Juuti, T., Kupiainen-Määttä, O.,
Olenius, T., Ortega, I. K., Clegg, S. L., Kurtén, T., Riipinen, I., and
Vehkamäki, H.: Hydration of Atmospherically Relevant Molecular Clusters:
Computational Chemistry and Classical Thermodynamics, J. Phys.   Chem. A, 118, 2599–2611, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp500712y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp500712y</a>,
2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Henschel et al.(2016)Henschel, Kurtén, and
Vehkamäki</label><mixed-citation>
Henschel, H., Kurtén, T., and Vehkamäki, H.: Computational Study on the
Effect of Hydration on New Particle Formation in the Sulfuric Acid/Ammonia
and Sulfuric Acid/Dimethylamine Systems, J. Phys. Chem. A., 120, 1886–1896,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Hoffmann et al.(2016)Hoffmann, Tilgner, Schrödner, Bräuer,
Wolke, and Herrmann</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, E. H., Tilgner, A., Schrödner, R., Bräuer, P., Wolke, R., and
Herrmann, H.: An advanced modeling study on the impacts and atmospheric
implications of multiphase dimethyl sulfide chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 11776–11781,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606320113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606320113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Hopkins et al.(2016)Hopkins, Bell, Yang, Suggett, and
Steinke</label><mixed-citation>
Hopkins, F. E., Bell, T. G., Yang, M., Suggett, D. J., and Steinke, M.: Air
exposure of coral is a significant source of dimethylsulfide (DMS) to the
atmosphere, Sci. Rep., 6, 1–11, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>IPCC(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2391 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Jimenez et al.(2009)Jimenez, Canagaratna, Donahue, Prevot, Zhang,
Kroll, DeCarlo, Allan, Coe, Ng, Aiken, Docherty, Ulbrich, Grieshop, Robinson,
Duplissy, Smith, Wilson, Lanz, Hueglin, Sun, Tian, Laaksonen, Raatikainen,
Rautiainen, Vaattovaara, Ehn, Kulmala, Tomlinson, Collins, Cubison, null
null, Dunlea, Huffman, Onasch, Alfarra, Williams, Bower, Kondo, Schneider,
Drewnick, Borrmann, Weimer, Demerjian, Salcedo, Cottrell, Griffin, Takami,
Miyoshi, Hatakeyama, Shimono, Sun, Zhang, Dzepina, Kimmel, Sueper, Jayne,
Herndon, Trimborn, Williams, Wood, Middlebrook, Kolb, Baltensperger, and
Worsnop</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun,
Y. L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
null null, Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R.,
Williams, P. I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann,
S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R.,
Takami, A., Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang,
Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C.,
Trimborn, A. M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb,
C. E., Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols
in the Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Johnson et al.(2004)Johnson, Ristovski, and Morawska</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, G., Ristovski, Z., and Morawska, L.: Method for measuring the
hygroscopic behaviour of lower volatility fractions in an internally mixed
aerosol, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 443–455,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.008</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Jörgensen et al.(2013)Jörgensen, Jensen, Kjaergaard, and
Anglada</label><mixed-citation>
Jörgensen, S., Jensen, C., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Anglada, J. M.: The
Gas-phase Reaction of Methane Sulfonic Acid with the Hydroxyl Radical Without
and With Water Vapor, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 5140–5150, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Kerminen et al.(2018)Kerminen, Chen, Vakkari, Petäjä, Kulmala, and
Bianchi</label><mixed-citation>
Kerminen, V.-M., Chen, X., Vakkari, V., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Bianchi,
F.: Atmospheric new particle formation and growth: review of field
observations, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 103003,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadf3c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadf3c</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Keskinen et al.(2011)Keskinen, Romakkaniemi, Jaatinen, Miettinen,
Saukko, Jorma, Mäkelä, Virtanen, Smith, and Laaksonen</label><mixed-citation>
Keskinen, H., Romakkaniemi, S., Jaatinen, A., Miettinen, P., Saukko, E., Jorma,
J., Mäkelä, J. M., Virtanen, A., Smith, J. N., and Laaksonen, A.: On-Line
Characterization of Morphology and Water Adsorption on Fumed Silica
Nanoparticles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45, 1441–1447,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.597459" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.597459</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Kildgaard et al.(2018a)Kildgaard, Mikkelsen, Bilde, and
Elm</label><mixed-citation>
Kildgaard, J. V., Mikkelsen, K. V., Bilde, M., and Elm, J.: Hydration of
Atmospheric Molecular Clusters: A New Method for Systematic Configurational
Sampling, J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 5026–5036, 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Kildgaard et al.(2018b)Kildgaard, Mikkelsen, Bilde, and
Elm</label><mixed-citation>
Kildgaard, J. V., Mikkelsen, K. V., Bilde, M., and Elm, J.: Hydration of
Atmospheric Molecular Clusters II: Organic Acid-Water Clusters, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 122, 8549–8556, 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>King et al.(2012)King, Butcher, Rosenoern, Coz, Lieke, De Leeuw,
Nilsson, and Bilde</label><mixed-citation>
King, S., Butcher, A., Rosenoern, T., Coz, E., Lieke, K., De Leeuw, G.,
Nilsson, E., and Bilde, M.: Investigating primary marine aerosol properties:
CCN activity of sea salt and mixed inorganic-organic particles, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 46, 10405–10412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es300574u" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es300574u</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Kristensen et al.(2017)Kristensen, Jensen, Glasius, and
Bilde</label><mixed-citation>
Kristensen, K., Jensen, L., Glasius, M., and Bilde, M.: The effect of sub-zero
temperature on the formation and composition of secondary organic aerosol
from ozonolysis of alpha-pinene, Environ. Sci., 19, 1220–1234, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c7em00231a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c7em00231a</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Kulmala et al.(2012)Kulmala, Petäjä, Nieminen, Sipilä, Manninen,
Lehtipalo, Dal Maso, Aalto, Junninen, Paasonen, Riipinen, Lehtinen,
Laaksonen, and Kerminen</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Nieminen, T., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H., Lehtipalo,
K., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P., Riipinen, I.,
Lehtinen, K., Laaksonen, A., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Measurement of the
nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles, Nat. Protoc., 7, 1651–1667,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.091" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.091</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Kulmala et al.(2013)Kulmala, Kontkanen, Junninen, Lehtipalo,
Manninen, Nieminen, Petäjä, Sipilä, Schobesberger, Rantala, and
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E.,
Nieminen, T., Petäjä, T., Sipilä, M., Schobesberger, S., Rantala,
P., et al.: Direct Observations of Atmospheric Aerosol Nucleation,
Science, 339, 943–946, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Lehtinen and Kulmala(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Lehtinen, K. E. J. and Kulmala, M.: A model for particle formation and growth in the atmosphere with molecular resolution in size, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 251–257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-251-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-251-2003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Lehtipalo et al.(2014)Lehtipalo, Leppä, Kontkanen, Kangasluoma,
Franchin, Wimnner, Schobesberger, Junninen, Petäjä, Sipilä
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Lehtipalo, K., Leppä, J., Kontkanen, J., Kangasluoma, J., Franchin, A.,
Wimnner, D., Schobesberger, S., Junninen, H., Petäjä, T., Sipilä,
M., et al.: Methods for determining particle size distribution and growth
rates between 1 and 3&thinsp;nm using the Particle Size Magnifier, Boreal
Environ. Res.,  19 (suppl. B), 215–236, ISSN: 1797-2469, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Leverentz et al.(2013)Leverentz, Siepmann, Truhlar, Loukonen, and
Vehkamäki</label><mixed-citation>
Leverentz, H. R., Siepmann, J. I., Truhlar, D. G., Loukonen, V., and
Vehkamäki, H.: Energetics of Atmospherically Implicated Clusters Made of
Sulfuric Acid, Ammonia, and Dimethyl Amine, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117,
3819–3825, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Lewis and Schwartz(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, E. and Schwartz, S.: Sea Salt Aerosol Production: Mechanisms, Methods,
Measurements and Models, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, ISBN: 9780875904177, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Li et al.(2018)Li, Karu, Brenninkmeijer, Fischer, Lelieveld, and
Williams</label><mixed-citation>
Li, M., Karu, E., Brenninkmeijer, C., Fischer, H., Lelieveld, J., and Williams,
J.: Tropospheric OH and stratospheric OH and Cl concentrations determined
from CH<sub>4</sub>, CH<sub>3</sub>, Cl, and SF<sub>6</sub> measurements, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, 1–7, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Liu et al.(2018)Liu, Nyord, Rong, and Feilberg</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Nyord, T., Rong, L., and Feilberg, A.: Real-time quantification of
emissions of volatile organic compounds from land spreading of pig slurry
measured by PTR-MS and wind tunnels, Sci. Total Environ., 639,
1079–1087, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.149" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.149</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Lopez-Yglesias et al.(2014)Lopez-Yglesias, Yeung, Dey, Brechtel, and
Chan</label><mixed-citation>
Lopez-Yglesias, X. F., Yeung, M. C., Dey, S. E., Brechtel, F. J., and Chan,
C. K.: Performance Evaluation of the Brechtel Mfg. Humidified Tandem
Differential Mobility Analyzer (BMI HTDMA) for Studying Hygroscopic
Properties of Aerosol Particles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 48,
969–980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.952366" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.952366</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Manninen et al.(2010)Manninen, Nieminen, Asmi, Gagné, Häkkinen,
Lehtipalo, Aalto, Vana, Mirme, Mirme, Hõrrak, Plass-Dülmer, Stange, Kiss,
Hoffer, TörÅ‘, Moerman, Henzing, de Leeuw, Brinkenberg, Kouvarakis,
Bougiatioti, Mihalopoulos, O'Dowd, Ceburnis, Arneth, Svenningsson,
Swietlicki, Tarozzi, Decesari, Facchini, Birmili, Sonntag, Wiedensohler,
Boulon, Sellegri, Laj, Gysel, Bukowiecki, Weingartner, Wehrle, Laaksonen,
Hamed, Joutsensaari, Petäjä, Kerminen, and Kulmala</label><mixed-citation>
Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Asmi, E., Gagné, S., Häkkinen, S., Lehtipalo, K., Aalto, P., Vana, M., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Hõrrak, U., Plass-Dülmer, C., Stange, G., Kiss, G., Hoffer, A., Törő, N., Moerman, M., Henzing, B., de Leeuw, G., Brinkenberg, M., Kouvarakis, G. N., Bougiatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Arneth, A., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tarozzi, L., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Birmili, W., Sonntag, A., Wiedensohler, A., Boulon, J., Sellegri, K., Laj, P., Gysel, M., Bukowiecki, N., Weingartner, E., Wehrle, G., Laaksonen, A., Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.: EUCAARI ion spectrometer measurements at 12 European sites – analysis of new particle formation events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7907–7927, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Mardyukov and Schreiner(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Mardyukov, A. and Schreiner, P. R.: Atmospherically Relevant Radicals Derived
from the Oxidation of Dimethyl Sulfide, Acc. Chem. Res., 51, 475–483, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Modini et al.(2010)Modini, Johnson, He, and Ristovski</label><mixed-citation>
Modini, R. L., Johnson, G. R., He, C., and Ristovski, Z. D.: Observation of the
suppression of water uptake by marine particles, Atmos. Res., 98,
219–228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.03.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.03.025</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Moore et al.(2010)Moore, Nenes, and Medina</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, R. H., Nenes, A., and Medina, J.: Scanning Mobility CCN Analysis—A
Method for Fast Measurements of Size-Resolved CCN Distributions and
Activation Kinetics, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44, 861–871,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.498715" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.498715</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Myllys et al.(2016)Myllys, Elm, and Kurtén</label><mixed-citation>
Myllys, N., Elm, J., and Kurtén, T.: Density Functional Theory Basis Set
Convergence of Sulfuric Acid-Containing Molecular Clusters, Comp. Theor.
Chem., 1098, 1–12, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Neese(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Neese, F.:, wIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.,  2, 73–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.81" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.81</a>
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Nguyen et al.(2017)Nguyen, Kjær, Kling, Boesen, and
Bilde</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, Q. T., Kjær, K. H., Kling, K. I., Boesen, T., and Bilde, M.: Impact of
fatty acid coating on the CCN activity of sea salt particles, Tellus B, 69, 1304064,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2017.1304064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2017.1304064</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Nilsson et al.(2001)Nilsson, Rannik, Swietlicki, Leck, Aalto, Zhou,
and Norman</label><mixed-citation>
Nilsson, E. D., Rannik, U., Swietlicki, E., Leck, C., Aalto, P. P., Zhou, J.,
and Norman, M.: Turbulent aerosol fluxes over the Arctic Ocean: 2.
Wind-driven sources from the sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 32139–32154, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900747" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900747</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Ovadnevaite et al.(2011)Ovadnevaite, Ceburnis, Martucci, Bialek,
Monahan, Rinaldi, Facchini, Berresheim, Worsnop, and
O'Dowd</label><mixed-citation>
Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Martucci, G., Bialek, J., Monahan, C., Rinaldi,
M., Facchini, M. C., Berresheim, H., Worsnop, D. R., and O'Dowd, C.: Primary
marine organic aerosol: A dichotomy of low hygroscopicity and high CCN
activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L21806,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048869" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048869</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Pajunoja et al.(2015)Pajunoja, Lambe, Hakala, Rastak, Cummings,
Brogan, Hao, Paramonov, Hong, Prisle, Malila, Romakkaniemi, Lehtinen,
Laaksonen, Kulmala, Massoli, Onasch, Donahue, Riipinen, Davidovits, Worsnop,
Petäjä, and Virtanen</label><mixed-citation>
Pajunoja, A., Lambe, A. T., Hakala, J., Rastak, N., Cummings, M. J., Brogan,
J. F., Hao, L., Paramonov, M., Hong, J., Prisle, N. L., Malila, J.,
Romakkaniemi, S., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kulmala, M., Massoli,
P., Onasch, T. B., Donahue, N. M., Riipinen, I., Davidovits, P., Worsnop,
D. R., Petäjä, T., and Virtanen, A.: Adsorptive uptake of water by
semisolid secondary organic aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
3063–3068, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063142" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063142</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Peng and Chan(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, C. and Chan, C. K.: The water cycles of water-soluble organic salts of
atmospheric importance, Atmos. Environ., 35, 1183–1192,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00426-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00426-X</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Petters and Kreidenweis(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Pieber et al.(2016)Pieber, El Haddad, Slowik, Canagaratna, Jayne,
Platt, Bozzetti, Daellenbach, Fröhlich, Vlachou, Klein, Dommen,
Miljevic, Jiménez, Worsnop, Baltensperger, and
Prévôt</label><mixed-citation>
Pieber, S. M., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T.,
Platt, S. M., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R., Fröhlich, R., Vlachou,
A., Klein, F., Dommen, J., Miljevic, B., Jiménez, J. L., Worsnop,
D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Inorganic Salt
Interference on CO<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> in Aerodyne AMS and ACSM Organic Aerosol Composition
Studies, Environ. Sci. Technol., 10494–10503
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01035</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Prather et al.(2013)Prather, Bertram, Grassian, Deane, Stokes,
DeMott, Aluwihare, Palenik, Azam, Seinfeld, Moffet, Molina, Cappa, Geiger,
Roberts, Russell, Ault, Baltrusaitis, Collins, Corrigan, Cuadra-Rodriguez,
Ebben, Forestieri, Guasco, Hersey, Kim, Lambert, Modini, Mui, Pedler, Ruppel,
Ryder, Schoepp, Sullivan, and Zhao</label><mixed-citation>
Prather, K., Bertram, T., Grassian, V., Deane, G., Stokes, M., DeMott, P.,
Aluwihare, L., Palenik, B., Azam, F., Seinfeld, J., Moffet, R., Molina, M.,
Cappa, C., Geiger, F., Roberts, G., Russell, L., Ault, A., Baltrusaitis, J.,
Collins, D., Corrigan, C., Cuadra-Rodriguez, L., Ebben, C., Forestieri, S.,
Guasco, T., Hersey, S., Kim, M., Lambert, W., Modini, R., Mui, W., Pedler,
B., Ruppel, M., Ryder, O., Schoepp, N., Sullivan, R., and Zhao, D.: Bringing
the ocean into the laboratory to probe the chemical complexity of sea spray
aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 7550–7555, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300262110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300262110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Quinn and Bates(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Quinn, P. and Bates, T.: The case against climate regulation via oceanic
phytoplankton sulphur emissions, Nature, 480, 51–56,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10580" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10580</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Rastak et al.(2017)Rastak, Pajunoja, Acosta Navarro, Ma, Song,
Partridge, Kirkevåg, Leong, Hu, Taylor, Lambe, Cerully, Bougiatioti, Liu,
Krejci, Petäjä, Percival, Davidovits, Worsnop, Ekman, Nenes, Martin,
Jimenez, Collins, Topping, Bertram, Zuend, Virtanen, and
Riipinen</label><mixed-citation>
Rastak, N., Pajunoja, A., Acosta Navarro, J. C., Ma, J., Song, M., Partridge,
D. G., Kirkevåg, A., Leong, Y., Hu, W. W., Taylor, N. F., Lambe, A.,
Cerully, K., Bougiatioti, A., Liu, P., Krejci, R., Petäjä, T., Percival,
C., Davidovits, P., Worsnop, D. R., Ekman, A. M. L., Nenes, A., Martin, S.,
Jimenez, J. L., Collins, D. R., Topping, D., Bertram, A. K., Zuend, A.,
Virtanen, A., and Riipinen, I.: Microphysical explanation of the RH-dependent
water affinity of biogenic organic aerosol and its importance for climate,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 5167–5177,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073056</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Riplinger and Neese(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Riplinger, C. and Neese, F.: An Efficient and Near Linear Scaling Pair Natural
Orbital Based Local Coupled Cluster Method, J. Chem. Phys., 138, 034106, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4773581,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Riplinger et al.(2013)Riplinger, Sandhoefer, Hansen, and
Neese</label><mixed-citation>
Riplinger, C., Sandhoefer, B., Hansen, A., and Neese, F.: Natural Triple
Excitations in Local Coupled Cluster Calculations with Pair Natural Orbitals,
J. Chem. Phys., 139, 134101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4821834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4821834</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Roberts and Nenes(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Roberts, G. C. and Nenes, A.: A Continuous-Flow Streamwise Thermal-Gradient
CCN Chamber for Atmospheric Measurements, Aerosol Sci. Technol.,
39, 206–221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290913988" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290913988</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Rosati(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
Rosati, B.: Data set containing raw and processed experimental data for the manuscript: Hygroscopicity and CCN potential of DMS-derived aerosol particles, Science Data [data set, code], <a href="https://sciencedata.dk/shared/4f1826ab4877ee70a2388cd519b3039a" target="_blank"/>,                     last of access: 21 September 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Rosati et al.(2020)Rosati, Paul, Iversen, Massling, and
Bilde</label><mixed-citation>
Rosati, B., Paul, A., Iversen, E. M., Massling, A., and Bilde, M.: Reconciling
atmospheric water uptake by hydrate forming salts, Environ. Sci.-Proc.  Im., 22, 1759–1767, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00179A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00179A</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Rosati et al.(2021a)Rosati, Christiansen, Wollesen de Jonge, Roldin,
Jensen, Wang, Moosakutty, Thomsen, Salomonsen, Hyttinen, Elm, Feilberg,
Glasius, and Bilde</label><mixed-citation>
Rosati, B., Christiansen, S., Wollesen de Jonge, R., Roldin, P., Jensen, M. M.,
Wang, K., Moosakutty, S. P., Thomsen, D., Salomonsen, C., Hyttinen, N., Elm,
J., Feilberg, A., Glasius, M., and Bilde, M.: New Particle Formation and
Growth from Dimethyl Sulfide Oxidation by Hydroxyl Radicals, ACS Earth
Space Chem., 5, 801–811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00333" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00333</a>, 2021a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Rosati et al.(2021b)Rosati, Christiansen, Dinesen, Roldin, Massling,
E, and Bilde</label><mixed-citation>
Rosati, B., Christiansen, S., Dinesen, A., Roldin, P., Massling, A., E, D. N.,
and Bilde, M.: The impact of atmospheric oxidation on hygroscopicity and
cloud droplet activation of inorganic sea spray aerosol, Sci. Rep.,
11, 10008, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89346-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89346-6</a>, 2021b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Schmale and Baccarini(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Schmale, J. and Baccarini, A.: Progress in Unraveling Atmospheric New Particle
Formation and Growth Across the Arctic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
e2021GL094198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094198" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094198</a>,
2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Schmitz and Elm(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Schmitz, G. and Elm, J.: Assessment of the DLPNO binding energies of strongly
non-covalent bonded atmospheric molecular clusters, ACS Omega, 5, 7601–7612,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. and Pandis, S.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air
Pollution to Climate Change, 3rd Edition, Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., ISBN: 978-1-118-94740-1, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Sekimoto et al.(2017)Sekimoto, Li, Yuan, Koss, Coggon, Warneke, and
de Gouw</label><mixed-citation>
Sekimoto, K., Li, S.-M., Yuan, B., Koss, A., Coggon, M., Warneke, C., and de
Gouw, J.: Calculation of the sensitivity of proton-transfer-reaction mass
spectrometry (PTR-MS) for organic trace gases using molecular properties,
International J. Mass Spectrom., 421, 71–94,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.006</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Smith(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, M.: Sea-salt particles and the CLAW hypothesis, Environ. Chem.,
4, 391–395, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Spracklen et al.(2006)Spracklen, Carslaw, Kulmala, Kerminen, Mann,
and Sihto</label><mixed-citation>
Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Mann, G. W., and Sihto, S.-L.: The contribution of boundary layer nucleation events to total particle concentrations on regional and global scales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5631–5648, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5631-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5631-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Stewart(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Stewart, J. J. P.: Optimization of Parameters for Semiempirical Methods. V.
Modification of NDDO Approximations and Application to 70 Elements, J. Molec.
Model., 13, 1173–1213, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Swietlicki et al.(2008)Swietlicki, Hansson, Hämeri, Svenningsson,
Massling, Mcfiggans, Mcmurry, Petäjä, Tunved, Gysel, Topping, Weingartner,
Baltensperger, Rissler, Wiedensohler, and Kulmala</label><mixed-citation>
Swietlicki, E., Hansson, H.-C., Hämeri, K., Svenningsson, B., Massling, A.,
Mcfiggans, G., Mcmurry, P., Petäjä, T., Tunved, P., Gysel, M., Topping, D.,
Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Rissler, J., Wiedensohler, A., and
Kulmala, M.: Hygroscopic properties of submicrometer atmospheric aerosol
particles measured with H-TDMA instruments in various environments – A
review, Tellus B, 60, 432–469,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00350.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00350.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Taipale et al.(2008)Taipale, Ruuskanen, Rinne, Kajos, Hakola, Pohja,
and Kulmala</label><mixed-citation>
Taipale, R., Ruuskanen, T. M., Rinne, J., Kajos, M. K., Hakola, H., Pohja, T., and Kulmala, M.: Technical Note: Quantitative long-term measurements of VOC concentrations by PTR-MS – measurement, calibration, and volume mixing ratio calculation methods, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6681–6698, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6681-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6681-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Tang et al.(2019)Tang, Guo, Bai, Huang, Wu, Wang, Zhang, Ding, Hu,
and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, M., Guo, L., Bai, Y., Huang, R.-J., Wu, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, G., Ding,
X., Hu, M., and Wang, X.: Impacts of methanesulfonate on the cloud
condensation nucleation activity of sea salt aerosol, Atmos.  Environ., 201, 13–17, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Tikkanen et al.(2018)Tikkanen, Väisänen, Hao, Holopainen, Wang,
Lehtinen, Virtanen, and Yli-Juuti</label><mixed-citation>
Tikkanen, O.-P., Väisänen, O., Hao, L., Holopainen, E., Wang, H., Lehtinen,
K. E. J., Virtanen, A., and Yli-Juuti, T.: Hygroscopicity of
dimethylaminium-, sulfate-, and ammonium-containing nanoparticles, Aerosol
Sci. Technol., 52, 971–983, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1484071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1484071</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Tomicic et al.(2018)Tomicic, Bødker Enghoff, and
Svensmark</label><mixed-citation>
Tomicic, M., Bødker Enghoff, M., and Svensmark, H.: Experimental study of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> aerosol nucleation at high ionization levels, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5921–5930, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5921-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5921-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Topping et al.(2016)Topping, Barley, Bane, Higham, Aumont, Dingle,
and McFiggans</label><mixed-citation>
Topping, D., Barley, M., Bane, M. K., Higham, N., Aumont, B., Dingle, N., and McFiggans, G.: UManSysProp v1.0: an online and open-source facility for molecular property prediction and atmospheric aerosol calculations, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 899–914, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-899-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-899-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Vallina and Simó(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Vallina, S. M. and Simó, R.: Re-visiting the CLAW hypothesis, Environ.  Chem., 4, 384–387, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Vanhanen et al.(2011)Vanhanen, Mikkilä, Lehtipalo, Sipilä,
Manninen, Siivola, Petäjä, and Kulmala</label><mixed-citation>
Vanhanen, J., Mikkilä, J., Lehtipalo, K., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E.,
Siivola, E., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Particle Size Magnifier for
Nano-CN Detection, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45, 533–542,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.547889" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.547889</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Veres et al.(2020)Veres, Neuman, Bertram, Assaf, Wolfe, Williamson,
Weinzierl, Tilmes, Thompson, Thames, Schroder, Saiz-Lopez, Rollins, Roberts,
Price, Peischl, Nault, Møller, Miller, Meinardi, Li, Lamarque, Kupc,
Kjaergaard, Kinnison, Jimenez, Jernigan, Hornbrook, Hills, Dollner, Day,
Cuevas, Campuzano-Jost, Burkholder, Bui, Brune, Brown, Brock, Bourgeois,
Blake, Apel, and Ryerson</label><mixed-citation>
Veres, P. R., Neuman, J. A., Bertram, T. H., Assaf, E., Wolfe, G. M.,
Williamson, C. J., Weinzierl, B., Tilmes, S., Thompson, C. R., Thames, A. B.,
Schroder, J. C., Saiz-Lopez, A., Rollins, A. W., Roberts, J. M., Price, D.,
Peischl, J., Nault, B. A., Møller, K. H., Miller, D. O., Meinardi, S., Li,
Q., Lamarque, J.-F., Kupc, A., Kjaergaard, H. G., Kinnison, D., Jimenez,
J. L., Jernigan, C. M., Hornbrook, R. S., Hills, A., Dollner, M., Day, D. A.,
Cuevas, C. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Burkholder, J., Bui, T. P., Brune, W. H.,
Brown, S. S., Brock, C. A., Bourgeois, I., Blake, D. R., Apel, E. C., and
Ryerson, T. B.: Global airborne sampling reveals a previously unobserved
dimethyl sulfide oxidation mechanism in the marine atmosphere, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 4505–4510,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919344117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919344117</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Whitehead et al.(2014)Whitehead, Irwin, Allan, Good, and
McFiggans</label><mixed-citation>
Whitehead, J. D., Irwin, M., Allan, J. D., Good, N., and McFiggans, G.: A meta-analysis of particle water uptake reconciliation studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11833–11841, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11833-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11833-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Wollesen de Jonge et al.(2021)Wollesen de Jonge, Elm, Rosati,
Christiansen, Hyttinen, Lüdemann, Bilde, and Roldin</label><mixed-citation>
Wollesen de Jonge, R., Elm, J., Rosati, B., Christiansen, S., Hyttinen, N., Lüdemann, D., Bilde, M., and Roldin, P.: Secondary aerosol formation from dimethyl sulfide – improved mechanistic understanding based on smog chamber experiments and modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9955–9976, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9955-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9955-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Ye et al.(2021)Ye, Goss, Isaacman-VanWertz, Zaytsev, Massoli, Lim,
Croteau, Canagaratna, Knopf, Keutsch, Heald, and Kroll</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, Q., Goss, M. B., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Zaytsev, A., Massoli, P., Lim, C.,
Croteau, P., Canagaratna, M., Knopf, D. A., Keutsch, F. N., Heald, C. L., and
Kroll, J. H.: Organic Sulfur Products and Peroxy Radical Isomerization in the
OH Oxidation of Dimethyl Sulfide, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5,
2013–2020, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00108</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Yli-Juuti et al.(2011)Yli-Juuti, Nieminen, Hirsikko, Aalto, Asmi,
Hõrrak, Manninen, Patokoski, Dal Maso, Petäjä, Rinne, Kulmala, and
Riipinen</label><mixed-citation>
Yli-Juuti, T., Nieminen, T., Hirsikko, A., Aalto, P. P., Asmi, E., Hõrrak, U., Manninen, H. E., Patokoski, J., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T., Rinne, J., Kulmala, M., and Riipinen, I.: Growth rates of nucleation mode particles in Hyytiälä during 2003−2009: variation with particle size, season, data analysis method and ambient conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12865–12886, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12865-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12865-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Zhao et al.(2016)Zhao, Buchholz, Kortner, Schlag, Rubach, Fuchs,
Kiendler-Scharr, Tillmann, Wahner, Watne, Hallquist, Flores, Rudich,
Kristensen, Hansen, Glasius, Kourtchev, Kalberer, and Mentel</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, D. F., Buchholz, A., Kortner, B., Schlag, P., Rubach, F., Fuchs, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Tillmann, R., Wahner, A., Watne, Å. K., Hallquist, M., Flores, J. M., Rudich, Y., Kristensen, K., Hansen, A. M. K., Glasius, M., Kourtchev, I., Kalberer, M., and Mentel, Th. F.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity, droplet growth kinetics, and hygroscopicity of biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic aerosol (SOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1105–1121, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1105-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1105-2016</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Zheng et al.(2021)Zheng, Wang, Wood, Jensen, Kuang, McCoy, Matthews,
Mei, Tomlinson, Shilling et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, G., Wang, Y., Wood, R., Jensen, M. P., Kuang, C., McCoy, I. L.,
Matthews, A., Mei, F., Tomlinson, J. M., Shilling, J. E., et al.: New
particle formation in the remote marine boundary layer, Nat. Commun., 12, 1–10, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Zuend et al.(2008)Zuend, Marcolli, Luo, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
Zuend, A., Marcolli, C., Luo, B. P., and Peter, T.: A thermodynamic model of mixed organic-inorganic aerosols to predict activity coefficients, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4559–4593, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4559-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4559-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Zuend et al.(2011)Zuend, Marcolli, Booth, Lienhard, Soonsin, Krieger,
Topping, McFiggans, Peter, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Zuend, A., Marcolli, C., Booth, A. M., Lienhard, D. M., Soonsin, V., Krieger, U. K., Topping, D. O., McFiggans, G., Peter, T., and Seinfeld, J. H.: New and extended parameterization of the thermodynamic model AIOMFAC: calculation of activity coefficients for organic-inorganic mixtures containing carboxyl, hydroxyl, carbonyl, ether, ester, alkenyl, alkyl, and aromatic functional groups, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9155–9206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9155-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9155-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
