<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-12401-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Parameterizations of size distribution and refractive index of biomass
burning organic aerosol<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> with black carbon content</article-title><alt-title>Size distributions and refractive index of BBOA</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Size distributions and refractive index of BBOA}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B. Luo et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>Biao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Kuang</surname><given-names>Ye</given-names></name>
          <email>kuangye@jnu.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4813-9784</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Shan</given-names></name>
          <email>shanhuang_eci@jnu.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5575-4510</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Qicong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Weiwei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-6304</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>Yuwen</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Duohong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Yue</surname><given-names>Dingli</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>Bin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3041-0329</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>Min</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University,
Guangzhou 511443, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Guangdong-Hongkong-Macau Joint Laboratory of Collaborative Innovation for Environmental Quality, Guangzhou 511443, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou
Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Guangdong Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center, State
Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Air Quality Monitoring,
Guangzhou 510308, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Ye Kuang (kuangye@jnu.edu.cn) and Shan
Huang (shanhuang_eci@jnu.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>21</day><month>September</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>18</issue>
      <fpage>12401</fpage><lpage>12415</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>March</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>30</day><month>May</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25</day><month>August</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>August</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 Biao Luo et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/acp-22-12401-2022.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/acp-22-12401-2022.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/acp-22-12401-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/acp-22-12401-2022.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e198">Biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA) impacts significantly on climate
directly through scattering and absorbing solar radiation and indirectly
through acting as cloud condensation nuclei. However, fundamental parameters
in the simulation of BBOA radiative effects and cloud activities such as
size distribution and refractive index remain poorly parameterized in
models. In this study, biomass burning events with high combustion
efficiency characterized by a high black carbon (BC) to BBOA ratio (0.22 on
average) were frequently observed during autumn in the Pearl River Delta
region, China. An improved absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) ratio
method considering both variations and spectral dependence of black carbon
AAE was proposed to differentiate brown carbon (BrC) absorptions from total
aerosol absorptions. BBOA size distributions, mass scattering and absorption
efficiency were retrieved based on the changes in aerosol number size
distribution, scattering coefficients and derived BrC absorptions that
occurred with BBOA spikes. Geometric mean diameter of BBOA volume size
distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depended largely on combustion conditions, ranging
from 245 to 505 nm, and a linear relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>​​​​​​​ was achieved. The retrieved real part of the BBOA refractive index
ranges from 1.47 to 1.64, with evidence showing that its variations might
depend largely on combustion efficiency, which is rarely investigated in
existing literature but which however requires further comprehensive investigations.
Retrieved imaginary parts of BBOA refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) correlated
highly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but differ a lot from previous parameterization schemes. The reason behind the inconsistency
might be that single formula parameterizations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the
whole <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range were used in previous studies which might deviate
substantially for specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges. Thus, a new scheme that
parameterizes wavelength-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was presented, which filled
the gap for field-based BBOA absorptivity parameterizations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">​</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">​</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">​</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">​</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">​</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">​</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">​</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These findings have significant implications for
simulating BBOA climate effects and suggest that linking both BBOA
refractive index and BBOA volume size distributions to BC content might be a
feasible and a good choice for climate models.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e386">Biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA) emitted from natural and
anthropogenic fire activities represents a major fraction of atmospheric
primary organic aerosols and impacts significantly on climate and regional air
quality directly through scattering and absorbing solar radiation and
indirectly through acting as cloud condensation nuclei (Saleh et al.,
2014, 2015; Q. Wang et al., 2016​​​​​​​; Zhang et al., 2020; L. Liu et al.,
2020). BBOA size distributions are crucial for simulating aerosol–cloud
interactions, and BBOA scattering plays a significant role in direct aerosol
cooling effects and local visibility degradation. BBOA is also a major
contributor to atmospheric brown carbon (BrC) on a global scale
(Q. Wang et al., 2016) because of its
non-negligible light absorption contribution in the near-ultraviolet to
visible wavelength. Accurate representations of BBOA size distributions,
scattering and absorption in climate models are crucial for BBOA radiative
forcing simulations, and bias in biomass burning absorption representations
in models can result in a biomass burning radiative forcing range from cooling
to warming (Brown et al., 2021). BBOA size distribution and
refractive index are fundamental parameters in the simulation of BBOA
radiative effects and cloud activities; however, they remain poorly parameterized
in models. Currently, our comprehensive knowledge of BBOA optical and
physical properties is primarily obtained from laboratory measurements
(Janhäll et al., 2010; Saleh et al., 2013; McClure et al., 2020).
Although field measurements of biomass burning events were reported by many
studies (Laskin et al., 2015), however, only a few of them focused
simultaneously on both BBOA size distributions and optical properties
(Reid et al., 2005a, b; Laing et al., 2016), and their
parameterizations were reported by few studies. Comprehensive field
measurements and simultaneous characterization of BBOA size distributions,
scattering and absorption properties, and retrieval of real and imaginary
parts of BBOA refractive index, as well as their parameterizations, remain
lacking, hindering the accurate representation of BBOA size distributions
and refractive index in climate models.</p>
      <p id="d1e389">In situ field-measured aerosols are mixtures of different aerosol components
emitted from different sources and formed through different pathways. The
BBOA mass concentrations might be identified through source apportionment of
organic aerosols using the positive matrix factorization (PMF) technique on the
basis of aerosol mass spectrometer measurements
(Kuang et al., 2021). However, the BBOA
size distributions, BBOA scattering properties and BBOA light absorptions
are usually quite difficult to separate from properties of the entire
aerosol populations. As a result, BBOA physical properties such as size
distribution, mass scattering efficiency (MSE), mass absorption efficiency
(MAE) and refractive index of biomass burning aerosols characterized through
in situ field measurements are usually not specific to BBOA
(Laing et al., 2016). Especially the parameterization of
the imaginary part of the BBOA refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) has received
wide attention in recent years due to its critical role in BBOA
absorptivity representation in climate models (Saleh, 2020). However,
the currently available parameterization schemes were primarily based on
laboratory experiments, with very few field-measurement-based results
available (Lu et al., 2015). Liu et al. (2021) observed
the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a real atmospheric environment chamber for
different fire conditions at hourly scales after emission under different
oxidation conditions. Still, the spectral dependence parameterization of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the basis of in situ field measurements covering a
wavelength range from ultraviolet to near-infrared remains lacking.</p>
      <p id="d1e440">The key reason limiting the on-line characterization of BBOA refractive
index based on the real atmosphere measurements is that the on-line accurate
quantification of BrC light absorption has been a challenge due to the
entanglement of black carbon (BC) absorption. Many studies have shown that
the distinct difference between BC and BrC spectral absorption
characteristics represented by the Ångström law can be used to segregate
BrC absorptions from measured total aerosol absorptions by assuming a
constant absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) of BC (AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(de Sá et al., 2019; X. Wang et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2009). The BrC
absorption retrieval accuracy of this constant AAE method depends highly on
the representativeness of used AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Results of field and laboratory
studies demonstrated that AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varies under different pollution and
emission conditions (Zhang et al., 2019; Laskin et al., 2015). Model
simulations and field observations show that AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is affected by many
factors such as BC mixing state, morphology, BC mass size distribution and optical wavelength, and values of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can reach up to 1.6 for
specific wavelength pairs (Lack and Cappa, 2010). Recent studies
have modified the AAE method through a better consideration of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
variations. Zhang et al. (2019) used the AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>880–990</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained from
real-time Aethalometer measurements as AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, considering that aerosol
absorptions at near-infrared wavelengths are associated only with BC. Other
studies determined AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> through Mie theory simulations using
constrained BC mass or BC mixing states as inputs (Li et al., 2019; Wang
et al., 2018; Qin et al., 2018; X. Wang et al., 2016). Wang et al. (2018)
found remarkable AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> wavelength dependence and a relatively stable
ratio for AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of certain wavelength ranges, which could be used
to represent spectral dependence of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, this ratio method
proposed by Wang et al. (2018) assumes that BrC absorption contributes
negligibly at 520 nm, which might bring some uncertainties and cannot be
used to retrieve the spectral characterization of BrC absorption for
wavelengths near and beyond 520 nm.</p>
      <p id="d1e553">In this study, aerosol chemical compositions, size distributions, and
aerosol scattering and absorption coefficients were measured at a rural site
in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region of China, where biomass burning events
frequently occurred in autumn and played significant roles in regional air
quality (Liu et al., 2014). An improved method considering both
variations and spectral dependence of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was proposed to quantify
the BrC absorption spectral dependence from 370 to 660 nm. The
differential method was applied to biomass burning events to estimate BBOA
scattering and absorption properties, as well as BBOA size distributions. The
combination of identified BBOA size distributions, MSE and MAE was used to
retrieve the real and imaginary parts of BBOA refractive index using the Mie
theory, based on which the parameterizations of BBOA size distributions and
refractive index using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio were investigated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Field measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e592">Field measurements were performed from 30 September to 17 November 2019 at a
rural site in Heshan county, Guangdong Province, China. The site is located at
the top of a small hill surrounded by small villages and residential towns,
and it usually experiences air masses from cities of the highly industrialized
PRD region. This site is authorized as a supersite operated by the
provincial environmental monitoring authority, and therefore continuous
qualified measurements of meteorological parameters such as air temperature,
relative humidity (RH), wind speed and wind direction, as well as pollutant measurements
such as of carbon monoxide, ozone and nitrogen oxides, are carried out. Physical
and chemical properties of ambient aerosol were comprehensively measured
during this field campaign, including multi-wavelength (450, 525, 635 nm) aerosol scattering coefficient (nephelometer, Aurora 3000) measurements
under nearly dry (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and controlled but fixed RH conditions
using humified nephelometer system (Kuang
et al., 2020), multi-wavelength absorption measurements using an
Aethalometer (Magee, AE33; Drinovec et al., 2015),
aerosol size distribution measurements using a scanning mobility particle
sizer (SMPS, TSI 3080) and an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS, TSI Inc.,
Model 3321), and aerosol chemical composition measurements using a
soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer. The AE33 measurements were
only valid from 30 September to 31 October. Continuous and stable
measurements of aerosol chemical composition using the aerosol mass
spectrometer measurements were valid from 10 October onwards. More details on the
site and instrument set-up can be found in Kuang et al. (2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e605">Accurate AAE and absorption measurements are crucial for the BrC
quantification. Results of previous comparison studies of aerosol absorption
measurements between the AE33 and photoacoustic soot spectrometer demonstrated
that AAE will only be slightly influenced by the particle collection of AE33
on the filter (Saleh et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2020). However, aerosol
absorption values measured by AE33 bear uncertainties associated with
loading and multiple scattering effects. Dual-spot mode was applied in AE33
measurements for dealing with the Aethalometer loading effect. A
multiple-scattering correction factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was used to convert the measured
attenuation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ATN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) by AE33 to the absorption coefficient of
ambient aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at each wavelength through <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ATN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is considered to be dependent on filter tape
(Drinovec et al., 2015), and aerosol chemical
compositions (Wu et al., 2009; Collaud Coen et al., 2010). Results of
Yus-Díez et al. (2021) showed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values increased considerably when single scattering albedo (SSA) is higher
than 0.95. However, as shown in Fig. S5, SSA is much lower than 0.95 during
this field campaign with an average of 0.78. Moreover, the filter tape 8060
was used for AE33 during this field campaign. Zhao et al. (2020) evaluated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of filter tape 8060 through comparing AE33 measurements
with a three-wavelength photoacoustic soot spectrometer, and their results
demonstrated that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is almost independent of wavelength and differs little
among measurements of different locations. Thus the wavelength-independent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
of filter tape 8060 of 2.9 recommended by Zhao et al. (2020)
was used, and this value is also almost the median value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges used in
Kasthuriarachchi et al. (2020).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Aerosol mass spectrometer measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e710">The size-resolved aerosol chemical compositions of dried aerosol particles
with aerodynamic diameter less than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m were measured using a soot
particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SP-AMS, Aerodyne Research, Inc.,
Billerica, MA, USA). As discussed in Kuang
et al. (2021), the mass concentrations of aerosol chemical compositions from
SP-AMS were validated by offline PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> filter measurements, SMPS
aerosol volume concentration measurements and online measurements for
inorganic aerosol components. The source identification of organic aerosols
was conducted using the PMF method based on the high-resolution organic aerosol (OA) data
collected in V-mode (only tungsten vaporizer). As introduced in Sect. S1 of the Supplement, six
OA factors were identified based on the best performance criteria of PMF
quality parameters, and more details about the determination factor number and
factor sources are presented in Sect. S1. Two primary OA factors include BBOA
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and hydrocarbon-like organic aerosols (HOAs, containing
cooking emissions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The other four factors were associated with
secondary formations or ageing processes: (1) more oxygenated organic aerosols
(MOOAs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, associated with regional air mass
(Kuang et al., 2021)), (2) less oxygenated
organic aerosols (LOOAs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, related to daytime photochemical
formation), (3) nighttime-formed organic aerosols (Night-OAs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
highly correlated with nitrate with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and exhibiting sharp increases
during the evening) and (4) aged BBOA (aBBOA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, exhibiting similar
diurnal behaviour to LOOA with strong daytime production). The mass
spectral profile and time series of these organic aerosol factors are shown
in Fig. S2, and details about the determination of these factors are
introduced in Sect. S1. The BBOA factor will be the focus of this study. On
the basis of the scheme proposed by Kuwata et al. (2012), the
density of BBOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and HOA was estimated as 1.25 and 1.15 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as inputs and is used in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Quantification of BrC absorptions based on the light absorption
wavelength dependence measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e901">BrC absorbs significantly at near-UV and short-visible wavelengths but
exhibits strong wavelength dependence (Saleh, 2020). The deconvolution
of the spectral dependence of measured aerosol light absorption has been a
common method to retrieve the BrC and BC absorption
distribution:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents measured total aerosol
absorption at wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
the absorption associated with BC (includes influences of BC size
distributions and mixing states, etc.), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the light absorption contributed by BrC. The spectral dependence of
BC absorption was usually accounted for using the Ångström exponent
law (Laskin et al., 2015), which describes BC absorption as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a constant
factor associated with BC mass concentration. The traditional method usually
assumes a constant AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1 (de Sá et al., 2019) or a wavelength-independent AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from near-infrared absorption measurements by
assuming that the BrC absorption is negligible at near-infrared wavelengths.
For example, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">950</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by AE33 can be used to formulate the spectral
dependence of aerosol absorptions associated with BC as the following:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M65" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–880</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–880</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            However, several recent modelling studies using Mie theory and BC
measurements demonstrated that AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varies as a function of
wavelength, and the wavelength-independent assumption of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> will
bring large uncertainties into BrC calculation (Li et al., 2019; Wang et
al., 2018). Wang et al. (2018) found <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 520–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 370–520</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differed much from each other – however, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 370–520</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 520–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio varied little –
and thus proposed an AAE ratio method to obtain real-time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 370–520</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and further deduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
method assumes that BrC contributes negligibly at 520 nm, which might
introduce uncertainties. In addition, this method is not applicable in
retrieving the spectral dependence of BrC absorption because only the ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 370–520</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 520–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used. This
modified wavelength-dependent AAE differentiation method was further
partially adopted by Li et al. (2019), using
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 370–520</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to account for spectral dependence of BC
absorption for wavelengths <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 520–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for wavelengths <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm; thus the wavelength-dependent AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was partially but not thoroughly considered.</p>
      <p id="d1e1335">In this study, we introduce an AAE ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to take spectral dependence of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into account and use
on-line measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under the assumption of negligible absorption contributions
of BrC at wavelengths of 880 and 950 nm. Thus, absorption measurements of
370, 470, 530, 590 and 660 nm can be used to retrieve the
spectral dependence of BrC absorptions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1412">Changes in perturbations associated with <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 370–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 370–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of different parameters. Perturbation ranges of
parameters are shown on the right side of the bar.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/12401/2022/acp-22-12401-2022-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1457"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is influenced by many factors such as BC refractive
index, coating shell refractive index, BC mixing state and BC
mass size distributions (Li et al., 2019). A
sensitivity experiment following the method of Li et
al. (2019) is initiated to explore impacts of these optical and mixing state
parameters on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–880</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
more details are available in Supplement Sect. S1. These parameters include
the real part of the refractive index of BC coating materials and BC-free
particles (Real_NBC), real and imaginary parts of refractive
index of the BC core (Real_BC and Imag_BC),
the mass fraction of externally mixed BC (r_ext), the number
fraction of BC-free particles (R_NBC), geometric standard
deviation (GSD), and geometric mean diameter (GM) of BC mass size
distributions. Note that the imaginary parts of the refractive index of BC
particle coating materials and BC-free particles were not perturbed in these
simulations and were treated as zero under the assumption of materials other than
BC being non-absorbing. In order to separate effects of BC and BrC on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–880</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes, this assumption must be made to obtain
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–880</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations associated only with BC
absorption changes. Thus, the defect of this method is that the entangling
effects of BrC coating on BC particles in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–880</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
variations are not considered. Impacts of these parameters on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 370–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (370) are investigated through perturbation
parameters within atmospherically relevant ranges reported in previous studies
(Bond et al., 2013; Tan et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2019), and ranges of
these parameters are listed in Fig. 1. The results of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 370–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. 1a. It shows that variations of both refractive
index of BC and coating materials and BC mixing states have
non-negligible influences on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 370–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; however, the BC mass
size distributions represented by geometric standard deviation (GSD) and
geometric mean diameter (GM) of BC mass size distribution play the most
important roles. Nevertheless, for results of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–880</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shown in Fig. 1b, when fixing the BC mass
size distribution, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–880</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited much smaller variations, and even the refractive index of BC
and shell or mixing state varied within atmospherically relevant ranges.</p>
      <p id="d1e1663">The result of sensitivity studies shown in Fig. 1b confirmed the applicability
of the proposed new AAE ratio method under constrained BC mass size
distributions. The elemental carbon fragments (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) retrieved from
SP-AMS measurements cannot be used to quantify BC mass concentrations due to
the lack of calibration parameters; however, its size distributions
generally represent the relative contributions of BC mass within different
diameter ranges. The real-time measured normalized C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions are
therefore used to distribute total BC mass to different diameter bins to
calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the average normalized C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
distribution is shown in Fig. S6. The average and standard deviations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (370), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (470),  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (520), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (590) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (660) are 0.79 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.044</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 0.85 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.038</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 0.88 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.035</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 0.9 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.035) and 0.93 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.031), respectively. Based on
this method, the spectral dependence of BrC absorption can be derived as the
following:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M111" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Results of previous studies (Saleh, 2020; Yu et al., 2021) demonstrated
that non-negligible BrC absorptions at the near-infrared range and results of
Hoffer et al. (2017) demonstrated that the absorption
coefficient of tar balls at 880 nm is more than 10 % of that at 470 nm.
During this campaign, the average aerosol absorption at 880 nm is 26.7 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, derived average BrC absorption at 470 nm is 11.5 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
10 % of BrC absorption at 470 nm accounts for on average 4.2 % of
aerosol absorption at 880 nm, and the realistic BrC contribution at 880 nm is
likely lower considering that tar balls represent the most efficient BrC.
Thus, the assumption that negligible absorption contributions of BrC at
wavelengths of 880 and 950 nm when deriving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from AE33 measurements holds in most cases when BC dominates. In
addition, the key part of our newly proposed method is considering the
spectral dependence of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> through the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; however, the accurate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derivations need the robust performance of
AE33 at both 880 and 950 nm. Thus quality assurance of these measurements
should be warranted before using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC, 950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Dominant contribution of BBOA to BrC absorption</title>
      <p id="d1e2006">Biomass burning plumes around the observation site were frequently observed
during this field campaign at dusk as shown in Fig. S7a and d and only
sometimes during daytime periods (Fig. S7b, c). The average diurnal
variations of resolved primary OA factors including both BBOA and HOA are
presented in Fig. S8, in which average diurnal profiles of both BBOA and HOA
exhibited sharp increases around 18:00 local time (LT), which should be
associated with frequently observed biomass burning events and supper
cooking in villages and towns near this site. However, diurnal behaviours of
BBOA and HOA differ much from about 06:00 to 16:00 LT. HOA exhibited
continuous decreases during this daytime period, which was associated with
boundary layer processes and re-partitioning due to increasing temperature.
The BBOA showed almost continuous but slow increases from morning to the
afternoon, indicating strong daytime emissions of BBOA as shown in Fig. S7b and c, although not as prominent as the BBOA emission just before the fall of
nighttime. The probability distribution of the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also shown
in Fig. S8b, which shows that the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached beyond 2 in 57 %
conditions with an average of 3.3, which demonstrates that biomass burning
was a dominant primary aerosol emission source during this field campaign.</p>
      <p id="d1e2033">The observed AAEs between different wavelengths and 880 nm of total aerosol
absorption are shown in Fig. 2a, and the average values of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>370–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>470–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>520–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>590-880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>660–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>950–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are 1.17, 1.23, 1.18, 1.15, 1.08 and 1.04. The scatter plots of
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>370–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shown in Fig. 2b show that
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>370–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was highly correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating
strong influences of BBOA on aerosol absorption wavelength dependence. The
BrC absorption at multiple wavelengths are extracted using the improved AAE
ratio method introduced in Sect. 2, and statistical ranges of BrC absorption,
as well as their contributions to total aerosol absorption, are shown in
Fig. 2d. Average values of derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 370, 470, 520,
590 and 660 nm are 19.1, 11.5, 6.4, 3.45 and 1.13 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and their contributions to total aerosol
absorption are 23 %, 18 %, 12 %, 8 % and 3 %, respectively. Similar to
some previous studies (Tao et al., 2020; Qin et al., 2018), these results
shows that the contributions of BrC to aerosol absorption at wavelengths of
less than 590 nm are not negligible. The derived time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. S9d, depicting BBOA varying quite consistently
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and with high correlations (correlation
coefficients between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 370, 470, 520, 590 and 660 nm and BBOA reaching 0.9, 0.83, 0.8, 0.76 and 0.69), suggesting that BBOA was
the dominant contributor to BrC absorption.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2218"><bold>(a)</bold> Probability distribution of AAE between different wavelengths
and 880 nm.  <bold>(b)</bold> Correlations between AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>370–880</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mass ratio of BBOA
and BC. <bold>(c)</bold> Correlations between the BrC absorption coefficients at 370 nm
and the BBOA mass loadings.  <bold>(d)</bold> Box-and-whisker plots of BrC absorption
fractions at different wavelengths.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/12401/2022/acp-22-12401-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Identification of BBOA size distributions and their parameterizations</title>
      <p id="d1e2255">During the observation period, BBOA contributed dominantly to BrC
absorptions, and notable biomass burning events represented by BBOA mass
concentration spikes as shown in Fig. S9 frequently occurred. Events with
BBOA increasing suddenly, drastically and continuously within a half hour to
several hours were identified as BBOA spikes. We do not have a criterion on
this, and we choose spikes artificially. These identified spikes generally
last about 0.5–1.5 h (from the beginning to the peak). The used BBOA
spikes were shaded in Fig. S9, and some of identified spikes were not used
because of the missing particle number size distribution measurements.
These biomass burning spikes are related with biomass burning plumes that
swept over the observation site; thus the difference between aerosol
properties measured before and during these spikes can represent the
properties of biomass burning aerosols. Theses spikes usually occurred
during supper cooking time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18:00 LT), and typical biofuels
used for cooking are mainly vegetation fuels such as local woods. SMPS
directly measures the aerosol particle number size distribution (PNSD), thus
also providing particle volume size distribution measurements (PVSD). Figure 3a
shows the average differences of mass concentrations of different aerosol
components of identified spikes with simultaneous valid SMPS data. Ammonium
nitrate (AN) and ammonium sulfate (AS) were determined as the dominant form
of ammonium, sulfate and nitrate ions during this field campaign and paired
using the scheme proposed by Gysel et al. (2007). Note that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> shown in Fig. 3a and also hereafter means the
difference between that variable before BBOA increases and when BBOA reaches
its peak (the definition of the BBOA spike; these peaks are also marked in
Fig. S9), corresponding to the start and end of BBOA increase. It shows that
inorganic aerosol components increased a little bit, which is consistent
with previous studies (Hecobian et al., 2011; Pratt et al., 2011) showing that
biomass burning emits tiny amounts of inorganic aerosol. However, it is
difficult to quantify how much of these inorganic aerosol increases was
attributed to biomass burning emissions because the biomass burning spikes
were usually observed during the periods with secondary nitrate formation
(Kuang et al., 2021). Secondary organic
aerosol components changed a little, with the slight increase in aBBOA
suggesting plumes were aged a little bit. Obvious increases in HOA were
observed, but the most prominent increase was BBOA. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio for cases when BC
measurements were valid was 0.22, suggesting the observed biomass burning
events are likely flaming and burning conditions with high combustion efficiency
(Reid et al., 2005b; McClure et al., 2020). The cooking-related organic
aerosol could not be separated from HOA in PMF analysis. The co-increase in
HOA is due to the fact that these identified spikes occurred during periods
of supper cooking as discussed before.</p>
      <p id="d1e2288">The average aerosol particle number and volume size distribution differences
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PNSD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PVSD) calculated as the PNSD and PVSD
differences between those at the BBOA peak concentration and those before the
BBOA spikes are shown in Fig. 3b, and the example of calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PNSD
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PVSD is shown in Fig. S10. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PVSD can be
well fitted using two log-normal modes (Mode 1 and Mode 2); the dominant one
is BBOA, and the other is mostly associated with HOA according to the aerosol
mass changes. Geometric mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and standard deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values of the two PVSD log-normal modes are 180 and 390 and 1.46 and 1.5,
respectively. In addition, the SP-AMS measurements
provide organic aerosol size distributions with vacuum aerodynamic diameter
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">va</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and their average distribution difference of organic aerosols during
these spikes is also shown in Fig. S11 and could be generally fitted well
using two log-normal modes of BBOA and HOA. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Dva</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the identified modes were 175 and 395 and 1.46 and 1.55,
respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">va</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and mobility diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the SMPS were related
through the effective density of particles as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Dva</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Dp</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the aerosol effective density
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a factor related to aerosol shape, for which a value of 0.8 was
adopted (Jayne et al., 2000). Based on densities of BBOA and HOA
introduced in Sect. 2.2, identified <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of BBOA and HOA from SP-AMS
measurements of 395 and 190 nm, which were quite close to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
identified from SMPS measurements, further confirming the results from SMPS
measurements. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PNSD is shown in Fig. 3b, displaying a
number concentration peak near 90 nm; however, influences of HOA need to be
excluded to identify biomass burning PNSD modes. As shown in Fig. 3b,
converting the identified BBOA and HOA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PVSD modes to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PNSD
modes cannot explain the observed PNSD difference, and the remaining mode is
log-normal and peaks at 70 nm. These results indicate that two modes existed
for biomass burning aerosols during this campaign, which is consistent with
findings of previous studies (Okoshi et al., 2014; J. Liu et al., 2020).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2507"><bold>(a)</bold> Average
differences of aerosol components before and after BBOA spikes.  <bold>(b)</bold>
Corresponding particle average number and volume size distribution
difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PNSD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PVSD). <bold>(c)</bold> Relationship between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  <bold>(d)</bold> The
relationships between identified <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of BBOA spikes and corresponding
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb (ug m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(e)</bold> Relationship between
retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(f)</bold> Relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BBOA.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/12401/2022/acp-22-12401-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2707">For spikes where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BBOA dominated the mass changes, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of BBOA PVSD was retrieved by fitting the larger mode of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> PVSD, with retrieved results shown in Fig. 3d and e. The
retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 245 to 505 nm with an average of 380 nm.
Physicochemical properties of biomass burning emissions depended largely on
combustion conditions. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is a proxy of biomass combustion
efficiencies (McClure et al., 2020), and it was
found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was highly correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3c, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
also used as a proxy for combustion efficiency in this study. Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to higher combustion efficiency. Retrieved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were moderately but negatively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and a linear relationship
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">551</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–13.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was derived. This
result is qualitatively consistent with previous studies that biomass burning
aerosols were mainly in the accumulation mode, and their average sizes
generally decreased as the combustion efficiency increased (Reid and
Hobbs, 1998; Janhäll et al., 2010). Retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from
1.2 to 2.0 with an average of 1.5 and is negatively and weakly correlated
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Reid et al. (2005b)
reported that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is typically in the range of 250 to 300 nm with the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the order of 1.6 to 1.9 for freshly generated smoke and 30 to 80 nm larger for aged smoke with smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.4 to 1.6).
Levin et al. (2010) performed laboratory
combustion of various wildland fuels and reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 200 to 570 nm
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.68 to 2.97. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
near the reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range of Reid et al. (2005b) for aged smoke. The geometric mean of PNSD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values is
converted from retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and also shown in
Fig. 3e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from 88 to 391 nm with an average of 235 nm. The
average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is similar to the reported average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of aged smoke
but the range is even beyond the range (100–300 nm) for both fresh and aged
smoke reported by Janhäll et al. (2010), in which
literature-published <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reviewed, and also beyond the range (about
130–240 nm) reported in Laing et al. (2016) for aged
biomass burning aerosol from wildfires in Siberia and the western USA.
Similar with results of Janhäll et al. (2010),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is highly but negatively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The derived linear relationship <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.0027 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is close to that reported in Janhäll et al. (2010) (Fig. 3e). Janhäll et al. (2010) defined the
fresh smoke as plumes younger than 1 h, but aged smoke is mostly plumes
older than 1 d. The aged smoke in Laing et al. (2016) were also transported over 4–10 d. However, the smoke plumes
reported in this study occurred during supper cooking time and swept over
the observation site lasting about 1–3 h (from the beginning to BBOA
concentration fall back the background levels), which is consistent with the time needed for cooking, which means that the age of plumes are on the  order of
hours and near-freshly emitted. This is indirectly confirmed by the observed
changes in particle number concentrations in that the small Aitken mode dominates
the particle number concentrations (Fig. 3b), because coagulation is quick and
should cause a significant decrease in number concentrations of Aitken mode
aerosols on timescales of hours (Sakamoto et al., 2015; Laing et al.,
2016; Sakamoto et al., 2016). These results demonstrate that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vary over a wide range for near-freshly emitted BBOA from
vegetation fire smoke. Laing et al. (2016) reported
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was highly correlated with plume aerosol mass concentrations
(PMs) but not with any normalized variable such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Similar results were obtained in this study (Fig. 3f). The derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was weakly correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but highly
correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BBOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The new finding here is that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlated obviously with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but weakly
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BBOA. As discussed in implications, BBOA volume size
distributions determine BBOA bulk optical properties; thus accurate
representations of BBOA volume size distributions in climate models might be
more important than accurate representations of BBOA number size
distributions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>BBOA mass scattering efficiency and retrieval of the real part of the BBOA refractive index</title>
      <p id="d1e3353">The measured aerosol scattering coefficients at 525 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">525</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
during BBOA spikes were used to calculate the MSEs using the differential
method, thereby retrieving the real part of the BBOA refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
on the basis of Mie theory. Truncation error, non-ideality of light source
and RH conditions need to be corrected in the calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">525</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values under dry condition. The truncation error and non-ideality
of light source were corrected using the empirical formula provided by
Qiu et al. (2021). RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the dry nephelometer was
in the range of 20 % to 45 % with an average of 31 % and corrected by
considering measured aerosol optical hygroscopicity through <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">525</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">525</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">measured</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the optical
hygroscopicity parameter derived from aerosol light scattering enhancement
factor measurements (Kuang et al., 2017). To quantify
MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, MSEs of other aerosol components are needed. Using the paired
campaign average size distributions of AS and AN (Fig. S3), MSEs of AS and AN
were calculated as 4.6 and 4.8 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which were identical to those
identified by Tao et al. (2019) during autumn at
an urban area in this region but much higher than average values reported
in Hand and Malm (2007). Through the analysis of the OA
distribution measured by SP-AMS, it was found that the size distribution of
secondary organic aerosol (SOA) can be represented by two log-normal modes (Fig. S4). One is aBBOA, and
the other one includes MOOA, Night-OA, and MOOA. Thus, the MSE of MOOA,
Night-OA and LOOA (MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) was determined to be 6.3 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aBBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was 4.5 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated to be 3.2 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> using the size distribution identified in Fig. 3b. MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
calculated as 2.8 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> using the average normalized C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fragment
distributions, which was also very close to the MSE of elemental carbon
determined by Tao et al. (2019) (2.6 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The changes in aerosol scattering coefficients associated only with BBOA can
be calculated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M254" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">measured</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AS</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MSE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AN</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MSE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MSE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MSE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aBBOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MSE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aBBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Night</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MOOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LOOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MSE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          More
details about the MSE calculations of these components can be found in Sect. S1.
In addition, to minimize the influences of uncertainties of used MSEs of
other aerosol components on MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> derivations, only spikes with sum
changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>AS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>AN, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>Night-OA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>MOOA,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>LOOA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>aBBOA accounting for less than 25 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BBOA were used. Average changes in aerosol components for these spikes are
shown in Fig. 4a, with changes in most individual aerosol components being
almost negligible.</p>
      <p id="d1e3886">As shown in Fig. 4b, the derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">525</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> associated with
BBOA was highly correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BBOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
ranged from 3.1 to 7.5 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average of 5.3 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Reid et al. (2005a) reviewed the MSEs of
biomass burning (MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) aerosols and reported a range of 3.2–4.2 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for temperate and boreal fresh smoke and larger for corresponding
aged smoke (4.3 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). McMeeking et al. (2005)
theoretically calculated the MSEs of smoke-influenced aerosols and reported
a MSE range of 3–6 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Levin et al. (2010) conducted MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements of fresh biomass burning smoke of
various fuel types and reported a MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> range of 1.6 to 5.7 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Laing et al. (2016) reported a MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> range of
2.5 to 4.7 for aged biomass burning aerosols of wildfires, and a similar range
was reported by Briggs et al. (2017). However, no study
has specifically investigated MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variations, which are
very crucial for biomass burning aerosol climate effect simulations, since
aerosol components in models are usually separately represented
(Riemer et al., 2019). Although organic aerosols usually
dominate mass concentration of biomass burning aerosols, the reported
MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> range is generally higher than previously reported MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
ranges, which are likely associated with the fact that MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> includes
influences of low scattering efficiency components such as BC. Another
reason for this is that the identified geometric mean size of BBOA in this
study was generally larger than those reported before. Many studies have
shown that aerosol size distributions have crucial impacts on MSE variations
(Hand and Malm, 2007). Both
Levin et al. (2010) and
Laing et al. (2016) have reported that MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of
biomass burning aerosols was highly correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
relationship between MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
investigated (Fig. 4c, only six points with both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieval are available). Unlike results of previous studies, MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
was positively but weakly correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). However,
MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was highly correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and exhibited a
non-linear response with the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The non-linear increase
phenomenon was reported first but confirmed by Mie theory simulations by
assuming a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.5 under varying conditions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and refractive index (Fig. 4c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4311"><bold>(a)</bold> Average differences of aerosol components between nearest background and
the peak of BBOA spikes.  <bold>(b)</bold> Relationships between derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 525 nm only associated with BBOA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BBOA. <bold>(c)</bold>
Relationships between retrieved MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(d)</bold>
Relationship between retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/12401/2022/acp-22-12401-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4411">Aerosol refractive index was a fundamental parameter in simulating aerosol
optical properties in models. However, aerosol refractive index
investigations specific to BBOA are scarce because the direct retrieval of an
aerosol refractive index at least needs accurate and simultaneous
representations of MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, BBOA density and BBOA size distribution
shape. Only a few studies have indirectly retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of biomass-burning-related aerosols. For example, McMeeking et al. (2005)
and Levin et al. (2010) have retrieved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of biomass burning or smoke-influenced aerosols through using an
iterative algorithm to match measured size distributions of different
principles (mobility-related size versus optical size), and the reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges were 1.56 to 1.59 and 1.41 to 1.61, respectively. In this study,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of BBOA were retrieved using Mie theory with MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and BBOA density as inputs as introduced in Sect. S1.4
of the Supplement. This method assumes the external mixing of BBOA with
other aerosol components, which is due to characteristics and
dominant contribution of freshly emitted BBOA to observed mass changes for identified
biomass burning plumes. Note that the retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would also be
affected by the imaginary part of BBOA refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterization as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
introduced in the next section was used. Retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from 1.47
to 1.64 with an average of 1.56. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes from 1.47 to 1.64, it can
result in a double MSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for given BBOA size distributions. Thus, the
reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range was wide with respect to MSE simulations and
needs to be carefully parameterized in climate modes. The BBOA refractive index
is determined by its chemical structure; thus its variation might be
associated with fire combustion conditions. The relationship between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was further investigated and is
shown in Fig. 4d. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below 10 ppb (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was negatively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and thus like <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which, however, was not as
significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These results demonstrate that fire combustion
conditions might have significant impacts on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which, however, needs
further investigation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4777"><bold>(a)</bold> Average changes in organic aerosol components for BBOA spikes
when BC measurements are available. <bold>(b)</bold> Relationships between derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 525 nm only associated with BBOA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BBOA.
<bold>(c)</bold> Average spectral dependence of MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  <bold>(d)</bold>
Relationship between MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at 525 nm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<bold>(e)</bold> Relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 520 nm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BC/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BBOA.  <bold>(f)</bold> Relationship between the spectral dependence parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/12401/2022/acp-22-12401-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>BBOA mass absorption efficiency and parameterizations of the spectral dependence of the imaginary part of the BBOA refractive index</title>
      <p id="d1e4941">Derived BrC absorptions of BBOA spikes were used to calculate MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and retrieve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in combination with retrieved BBOA size
distributions using Mie theory. Average changes in organic aerosol
components for spikes with available <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are
shown in Fig. 5a. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BBOA dominated the mass changes; however, there were
non-negligible changes for aBBOA, HOA and MOOA. The average MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aBBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MOOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are estimated using multilinear regression
for all data points as shown in Fig. S12 with values at 370 nm of 0.1, 0.96
and 0.9 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Thus the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can
be derived as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M359" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.8}{8.8}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">derived</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aBBOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aBBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MOOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MSE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MOOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          As shown in Fig. 5b, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was moderately correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>BBOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), suggesting
MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>BBOA differs much
among identified plumes. Derived MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited strong wavelength
dependence, and average values at wavelengths of 370, 470, 520, 590 and 660 nm were 2.46, 0.99, 0.53, 0.28 and 0.11 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Figure 5c shows the
spectral dependence of MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and the formula form that parameterizes the spectral dependence was consistent
with previous studies (Saleh et al., 2014). BBOA
absorption properties depended largely on combustion conditions, consistent
with results of previous studies (Saleh et al., 2014; Lu et al.,
2015; Pokhrel et al., 2016; Xie et al., 2017; Cheng et al., 2019; McClure et
al., 2020), and both MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (520) were highly and
linearly correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5d and e).
Results regarding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterizations as a function
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of previous studies are also shown in Fig. 5e.
Results of Saleh et al. (2014) and Lu et
al. (2015) at 550 nm were higher for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the range
of 0.05 to 0.4. The curve of McClure et al. (2020)
described well the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
less than 0.2. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spectral dependence parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ranged from 2.5 to 5.5 with an average of 4.7 and was linearly and negatively
correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and much higher than those reported
in Saleh et al. (2014) and Lu et al. (2015). Note that the parameterization schemes established in
Saleh et al. (2014) and Lu et al. (2015)
were based on datasets with most data points have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also higher than the fitted line of
McClure et al. (2020) but was, however, actually
consistent with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range reported in Fig. 5c of
McClure et al. (2020) for a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range of 0.1 to
0.55. This result implies that a single formula that parameterizes
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over a wide <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (combustion efficiency) range might lead to
significant bias for specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges. As shown in Fig. 1 of
Lu et al. (2015), field-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are quite scarce, which hinders the accurate
parameterization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range of this study. The
combination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(520) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shown in Fig. 5e and f
would bring a new parameterization scheme of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
spectral dependence, which would fill the gap for field-based BBOA absorptivity
parameterizations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Implications for simulating climate effects of BBOA</title>
      <p id="d1e5720">Findings of BBOA size distributions and real and imaginary parts of BBOA
refractive index in this study have important implications for climate
modelling of BBOA radiative effects. The volume-dominant mode of biomass
burning aerosols contributes dominantly to aerosol mass, which is most
important for BBOA scattering and absorption properties. The volume-dominant
mode also contributed dominantly to number concentration for the diameter range
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm, and this diameter range played the dominant role in
BBOA aerosols as cloud condensation nuclei (Chen et al., 2019).
However, previous studies usually parameterized geometric mean
diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of combustion conditions. It was found that
BBOA mass scattering efficiency correlated well with the volume geometric
mean diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but correlated poorly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was in
contradiction to previous results (Levin et al., 2010; Laing et al.,
2016) that BBOA mass scattering efficiency was highly correlated with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the simulation results shown in Fig. S13 explain the
contrast, which is that aerosol scattering efficiency was very sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes for fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; however, they are much less sensitive to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied over
a wide range from 1.2 to 2 in this study. In addition, it was found that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlated poorly with normalized parameters such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlated highly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, representing BBOA volume size distribution
of the volume-dominant mode as a function of combustion conditions in
climate models might be a better choice if using only one size distribution
mode (Stier et al., 2005; Dentener et al., 2006); however, further
and synthesized research on this topic is needed. In view of this, on the basis of the
relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was parameterized as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gv</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">632</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and might be applicable in climate models
(Saleh, 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e5964">The real part of BBOA refractive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was a fundamental parameter for
simulating BBOA scattering properties in climate models; however, a constant
was usually used due to the lack of adequate parameterizations
(Brown et al., 2021). Significant changes were found in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in this study (1.47 to 1.64), and the variations were likely closely
associated with changes in fire combustion conditions represented by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For BBOA refractive index, the imaginary part
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is currently recommended to be parameterized as a function
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (Saleh et al., 2014), which is supported
by results of several studies (Lu et al., 2015; McClure et al., 2020).
Results of this study suggest that it might be also feasible to
parameterize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; however, this needs further comprehensive investigations.</p>
      <p id="d1e6072">The imaginary part of BBOA refractive index, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, plays crucial
role in representing BBOA absorptivity in climate models. Linear
relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the spectral dependence
parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are reported for the first time in this
study. The observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (0.05 to 0.55) is located within the upper
range of previously reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Few measurements regarding
aerosol refractive index and size distributions are available in this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
range, and no research has focused on parameterizations of the BBOA
refractive index in this specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range; thus results of this study
have partially filled this gap. Results of McClure
et al. (2020) demonstrate that a sigmoidal curve fits well the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
variations for a wide range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10); however, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations are not well captured by the fitted curve for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We recommend more sophisticated parameterizations
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6291">The data used in this study are available from the
corresponding authors upon request: Ye Kuang (kuangye@jnu.edu.cn)
and Shan Huang (shanhuang_eci@jnu.edu.cn).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e6294">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12401-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12401-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6303">YK and SH designed this experiment, and YK conceived and led this research. BL
and YK wrote the manuscript. SH and WH led the SP-AMS measurements and particle number size distribution measurements with the help of QS and WL. SH performed the PMF analysis and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fragment analysis, and revised the manuscript. MS and BY planned this
campaign. DC and DY provided permission to conduct the campaign at the Heshan
supersite and made data available from the site. YP provided pictures of biomass burning plumes and helped analyse trace gas  measurements.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6318">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e6324">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6330">We want to thank the two reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6335">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41805109 and 41807302). National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant nos. 2017YFC0212803, 2016YFC0202206), Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (grant no. 2019B110206001), Special Fund Project for Science and Technology Innovation Strategy of Guangdong Province (grant no. 2019B121205004), Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar (grant no. 2018B030306037), and Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program (grant no. 2016ZT06N263).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6341">This paper was edited by Stefania Gilardoni and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Briggs, N. L., Jaffe, D. A., Gao, H., Hee, J. R., Baylon, P. M., Zhang, Q.,
Zhou, S., Collier, S. C., Sampson, P. D., and Cary, R. A.: Particulate
Matter, Ozone, and Nitrogen Species in Aged Wildfire Plumes Observed at the
Mount Bachelor Observatory, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 16, 3075–3087,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.03.0120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2016.03.0120</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brown, H., Liu, X., Pokhrel, R., Murphy, S., Lu, Z., Saleh, R., Mielonen,
T., Kokkola, H., Bergman, T., Myhre, G., Skeie, R. B., Watson-Paris, D.,
Stier, P., Johnson, B., Bellouin, N., Schulz, M., Vakkari, V., Beukes, J.
P., van Zyl, P. G., Liu, S., and Chand, D.: Biomass burning aerosols in most
climate models are too absorbing, Nat. Commun., 12, 277​​​​​​​,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, L., Li, Q., Wu, D., Sun, H., Wei, Y., Ding, X., Chen, H., Cheng, T.,
and Chen, J.: Size distribution and chemical composition of primary
particles emitted during open biomass burning processes: Impacts on cloud
condensation nuclei activation, Sci. Total Environ., 674,
179–188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.419" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.419</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cheng, Z., Atwi, K., Onyima, T., and Saleh, R.: Investigating the dependence
of light-absorption properties of combustion carbonaceous aerosols on
combustion conditions, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 419–434,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1566593" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2019.1566593</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G., Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-457-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>de Sá, S. S., Rizzo, L. V., Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Yee, L. D., Wernis, R., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Liu, Y. J., Sedlacek, A., Springston, S., Goldstein, A. H., Barbosa, H. M. J., Alexander, M. L., Artaxo, P., Jimenez, J. L., and Martin, S. T.: Contributions of biomass-burning, urban, and biogenic emissions to the concentrations and light-absorbing properties of particulate matter in central Amazonia during the dry season, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7973–8001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7973-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7973-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dentener, F., Kinne, S., Bond, T., Boucher, O., Cofala, J., Generoso, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Hoelzemann, J. J., Ito, A., Marelli, L., Penner, J. E., Putaud, J.-P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., van der Werf, G. R., and Wilson, J.: Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750 prescribed data-sets for AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4321–4344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gysel, M., Crosier, J., Topping, D. O., Whitehead, J. D., Bower, K. N., Cubison, M. J., Williams, P. I., Flynn, M. J., McFiggans, G. B., and Coe, H.: Closure study between chemical composition and hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles during TORCH2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 6131–6144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L. and Malm, W. C.: Review of aerosol mass scattering efficiencies
from ground-based measurements since 1990, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D16203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008484" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008484</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hecobian, A., Liu, Z., Hennigan, C. J., Huey, L. G., Jimenez, J. L., Cubison, M. J., Vay, S., Diskin, G. S., Sachse, G. W., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Weinheimer, A. J., Liao, J., Knapp, D. J., Wennberg, P. O., Kürten, A., Crounse, J. D., Clair, J. St., Wang, Y., and Weber, R. J.: Comparison of chemical characteristics of 495 biomass burning plumes intercepted by the NASA DC-8 aircraft during the ARCTAS/CARB-2008 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13325–13337, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13325-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-13325-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoffer, A., Tóth, Á., Pósfai, M., Chung, C. E., and Gelencsér, A.: Brown carbon absorption in the red and near-infrared spectral region, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2353–2359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2353-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-2353-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Janhäll, S., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Biomass burning aerosol emissions from vegetation fires: particle number and mass emission factors and size distributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1427–1439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1427-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1427-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb,
C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for
Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 33, 49–70, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868200410840</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kasthuriarachchi, N. Y., Rivellini, L.-H., Adam, M. G., and Lee, A. K. Y.:
Light Absorbing Properties of Primary and Secondary Brown Carbon in a
Tropical Urban Environment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 10808–10819,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02414" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c02414</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kuang, Y., Zhao, C., Tao, J., Bian, Y., Ma, N., and Zhao, G.: A novel method for deriving the aerosol hygroscopicity parameter based only on measurements from a humidified nephelometer system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6651–6662, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6651-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-6651-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kuang, Y., He, Y., Xu, W., Zhao, P., Cheng, Y., Zhao, G., Tao, J., Ma, N., Su, H., Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Cheng, P., Yang, W., Zhang, S., Wu, C., Sun, Y., and Zhao, C.: Distinct diurnal variation in organic aerosol hygroscopicity and its relationship with oxygenated organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 865–880, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-865-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-865-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kuang, Y., Huang, S., Xue, B., Luo, B., Song, Q., Chen, W., Hu, W., Li, W., Zhao, P., Cai, M., Peng, Y., Qi, J., Li, T., Wang, S., Chen, D., Yue, D., Yuan, B., and Shao, M.: Contrasting effects of secondary organic aerosol formations on organic aerosol hygroscopicity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10375–10391, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10375-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-10375-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M., Zorn, S. R., and Martin, S. T.: Using Elemental Ratios to
Predict the Density of Organic Material Composed of Carbon, Hydrogen, and
Oxygen, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 787–794,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202525q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es202525q</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A. and Cappa, C. D.: Impact of brown and clear carbon on light absorption enhancement, single scatter albedo and absorption wavelength dependence of black carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4207–4220, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laing, J. R., Jaffe, D. A., and Hee, J. R.: Physical and optical properties of aged biomass burning aerosol from wildfires in Siberia and the Western USA at the Mt. Bachelor Observatory, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15185–15197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15185-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-15185-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric
Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Levin, E. J. T., McMeeking, G. R., Carrico, C. M., Mack, L. E., Kreidenweis,
S. M., Wold, C. E., Moosmüller, H., Arnott, W. P., Hao, W. M., Collett
Jr, J. L., and Malm, W. C.: Biomass burning smoke aerosol properties
measured during Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiments (FLAME), J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D18210,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013601</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, Z., Tan, H., Zheng, J., Liu, L., Qin, Y., Wang, N., Li, F., Li, Y., Cai, M., Ma, Y., and Chan, C. K.: Light absorption properties and potential sources of particulate brown carbon in the Pearl River Delta region of China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11669–11685, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11669-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-11669-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D. T., Li, S. Y., Hu, D. W., Kong, S. F., Cheng, Y., Wu, Y. Z., Ding,
S., Hu, K., Zheng, S. R., Yan, Q., Zheng, H., Zhao, D. L., Tian, P., Ye, J.
H., Huang, M. Y., and Ding, D. P.: Evolution of Aerosol Optical Properties
from Wood Smoke in Real Atmosphere Influenced by Burning Phase and Solar
Radiation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 5677–5688, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07569" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c07569</ext-link>,
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, D., Ding, P., Shen, C., Shen, K., He, Q.,
Ding, X., Wang, X., Chen, D., Szidat, S., and Zhang, G.: Source
apportionment using radiocarbon and organic tracers for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> carbonaceous
aerosols in Guangzhou, South China: contrasting local- and regional-scale
haze events, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12002–12011,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es503102w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es503102w</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Andersson, A., Zhong, G., Geng, X., Ding, P., Zhu, S., Cheng, Z.,
Zakaria, M. P., Bong, C. W., Li, J., Zheng, J., Zhang, G., and Gustafsson,
Ö.: Isotope constraints of the strong influence of biomass burning to
climate-forcing Black Carbon aerosols over Southeast Asia, Sci.
Total Environ., 744, 140359,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140359" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140359</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, L., Cheng, Y., Wang, S., Wei, C., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöhlker, C., Artaxo, P., Shrivastava, M., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., and Su, H.: Impact of biomass burning aerosols on radiation, clouds, and precipitation over the Amazon: relative importance of aerosol–cloud and aerosol–radiation interactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13283–13301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13283-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-13283-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., Winijkul, E., Yan, F., Chen, Y., Bond, T. C., Feng,
Y., Dubey, M. K., Liu, S., Pinto, J. P., and Carmichael, G. R.: Light
Absorption Properties and Radiative Effects of Primary Organic Aerosol
Emissions, Environmental Sci. Technol., 49, 4868–4877,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b00211</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McClure, C. D., Lim, C. Y., Hagan, D. H., Kroll, J. H., and Cappa, C. D.: Biomass-burning-derived particles from a wide variety of fuels – Part 1: Properties of primary particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1531–1547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1531-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1531-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McMeeking, G. R., Kreidenweis, S. M., Carrico, C. M., Lee, T., Collett Jr.,
J. L., and Malm, W. C.: Observations of smoke-influenced aerosol during the
Yosemite Aerosol Characterization Study: Size distributions and chemical
composition, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D09206,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005389" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005389</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Okoshi, R., Rasheed, A., Chen Reddy, G., McCrowey, C. J., and Curtis, D. B.:
Size and mass distributions of ground-level sub-micrometer biomass burning
aerosol from small wildfires, Atmos. Environ., 89, 392–402,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.024</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pokhrel, R. P., Wagner, N. L., Langridge, J. M., Lack, D. A., Jayarathne, T., Stone, E. A., Stockwell, C. E., Yokelson, R. J., and Murphy, S. M.: Parameterization of single-scattering albedo (SSA) and absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for aerosol emissions from biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9549–9561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pratt, K. A., Murphy, S. M., Subramanian, R., DeMott, P. J., Kok, G. L., Campos, T., Rogers, D. C., Prenni, A. J., Heymsfield, A. J., Seinfeld, J. H., and Prather, K. A.: Flight-based chemical characterization of biomass burning aerosols within two prescribed burn smoke plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12549–12565, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12549-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12549-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Qin, Y. M., Tan, H. B., Li, Y. J., Li, Z. J., Schurman, M. I., Liu, L., Wu, C., and Chan, C. K.: Chemical characteristics of brown carbon in atmospheric particles at a suburban site near Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16409–16418, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16409-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-16409-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Qiu, J., Tan, W., Zhao, G., Yu, Y., and Zhao, C.: New correction method for the scattering coefficient measurements of a three-wavelength nephelometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4879–4891, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4879-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-4879-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S. and Hobbs, P. V.: Physical and optical properties of young
smoke from individual biomass fires in Brazil, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 103, 32013–32030, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD00159</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Eck, T. F., Christopher, S. A., Koppmann, R., Dubovik, O., Eleuterio, D. P., Holben, B. N., Reid, E. A., and Zhang, J.: A review of biomass burning emissions part III: intensive optical properties of biomass burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 827–849, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-827-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-827-2005</ext-link>, 2005a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Koppmann, R., Eck, T. F., and Eleuterio, D. P.: A review of biomass burning emissions part II: intensive physical properties of biomass burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 799–825, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-799-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-799-2005</ext-link>, 2005b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., and Curtis, J. H.: Aerosol
Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts, Rev. Geophys.,
57, 187–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018RG000615</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sakamoto, K. M., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Taylor, J. W., Duck, T. J., and Pierce, J. R.: Aged boreal biomass-burning aerosol size distributions from BORTAS 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1633–1646, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1633-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1633-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sakamoto, K. M., Laing, J. R., Stevens, R. G., Jaffe, D. A., and Pierce, J. R.: The evolution of biomass-burning aerosol size distributions due to coagulation: dependence on fire and meteorological details and parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7709–7724, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7709-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7709-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Hennigan, C. J., McMeeking, G. R., Chuang, W. K., Robinson, E. S., Coe, H., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Absorptivity of brown carbon in fresh and photo-chemically aged biomass-burning emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7683–7693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7683-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7683-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Robinson, E. S., Tkacik, D. S., Ahern, A. T., Liu, S., Aiken, A.
C., Sullivan, R. C., Presto, A. A., Dubey, M. K., Yokelson, R. J., Donahue,
N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Brownness of organics in aerosols from biomass
burning linked to their black carbon content, Nat. Geosci., 7, 647–650​​​​​​​, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/Ngeo2220" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/Ngeo2220</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Marks, M., Heo, J., Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson,
A. L.: Contribution of brown carbon and lensing to the direct radiative
effect of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and biofuel burning emissions,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 10285–10296,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023697</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saleh, R.: From Measurements to Models: Toward Accurate Representation of
Brown Carbon in Climate Calculations, Current Pollution Reports, 6, 90–104,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00139-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40726-020-00139-3</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stier, P., Feichter, J., Kinne, S., Kloster, S., Vignati, E., Wilson, J., Ganzeveld, L., Tegen, I., Werner, M., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Minikin, A., and Petzold, A.: The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1125–1156, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tan, H., Liu, L., Fan, S., Li, F., Yin, Y., Cai, M., and Chan, P. W.:
Aerosol optical properties and mixing state of black carbon in the Pearl
River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 131, 196–208,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.003</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., Zhang, L., Wu, Z., Cheng, P., Li, M., Chen, L., Zhang, R., and Cao, J.: Impact of particle number and mass size distributions of major chemical components on particle mass scattering efficiency in urban Guangzhou in southern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8471–8490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8471-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8471-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Surapipith, V., Han, Z., Prapamontol, T., Kawichai, S., Zhang, L.,
Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., Li, J., Li, J., Yang, Y., and Zhang, R.: High mass
absorption efficiency of carbonaceous aerosols during the biomass burning
season in Chiang Mai of northern Thailand, Atmos. Environ., 240, 117821,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117821" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117821</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Nie, W., Cheng, Y., Shen, Y., Chi, X., Wang, J., Huang, X., Xie, Y., Sun, P., Xu, Z., Qi, X., Su, H., and Ding, A.: Light absorption of brown carbon in eastern China based on 3-year multi-wavelength aerosol optical property observations and an improved absorption Ångström exponent segregation method, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9061–9074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9061-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-9061-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Q., Saturno, J., Chi, X., Walter, D., Lavric, J. V., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Ditas, F., Pöhlker, C., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Modeling investigation of light-absorbing aerosols in the Amazon Basin during the wet season, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14775–14794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14775-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-14775-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Sedlacek, A. J., de Sá, S. S., Martin, S. T., Alexander, M. L., Watson, T. B., Aiken, A. C., Springston, S. R., and Artaxo, P.: Deriving brown carbon from multiwavelength absorption measurements: method and application to AERONET and Aethalometer observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12733–12752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12733-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12733-2016</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, D., Mao, J., Deng, X., Tie, X., Zhang, Y., Zeng, L., Li, F., Tan, H.,
Bi, X., Huang, X., Chen, J., and Deng, T.: Black carbon aerosols and their
radiative properties in the Pearl River Delta region, Sci. China
Ser. D, 52, 1152–1163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-009-0115-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11430-009-0115-y</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, M., Hays, M. D., and Holder, A. L.: Light-absorbing organic carbon from
prescribed and laboratory biomass burning and gasoline vehicle emissions,
Scientific Reports, 7, 7318​​​​​​​, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, M., Howell, S. G., Zhuang, J., and Huebert, B. J.: Attribution of aerosol light absorption to black carbon, brown carbon, and dust in China – interpretations of atmospheric measurements during EAST-AIRE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2035–2050, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2035-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2035-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, Z., Cheng, Z., Magoon, G. R., Hajj, O. E., and Saleh, R.:
Characterization of light-absorbing aerosols from a laboratory combustion
source with two different photoacoustic techniques, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 55, 387–397, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1849537" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2020.1849537</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yus-Díez, J., Bernardoni, V., Močnik, G., Alastuey, A., Ciniglia, D., Ivančič, M., Querol, X., Perez, N., Reche, C., Rigler, M., Vecchi, R., Valentini, S., and Pandolfi, M.: Determination of the multiple-scattering correction factor and its cross-sensitivity to scattering and wavelength dependence for different AE33 Aethalometer filter tapes: a multi-instrumental approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6335–6355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6335-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-6335-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, A., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Weber, R. J., Song, Y., Ke, Z., and Zou, Y.: Modeling the global radiative effect of brown carbon: a potentially larger heating source in the tropical free troposphere than black carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1901–1920, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1901-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1901-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, G., Peng, L., Lian, X., Lin, Q., Bi, X., Chen, D., Li, M., Li, L.,
Wang, X., and Sheng, G.: An Improved Absorption Ångström Exponent
(AAE)-Based Method for Evaluating the Contribution of Light Absorption from
Brown Carbon with a High-Time Resolution, Aerosol Air Qual. Res.,
19, 15–24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.12.0566" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2017.12.0566</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, G., Tao, J., Kuang, Y., Shen, C., Yu, Y., and Zhao, C.: Role of black carbon mass size distribution in the direct aerosol radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13175–13188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13175-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-13175-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, G., Yu, Y., Tian, P., Li, J., Guo, S., and Zhao, C.: Evaluation and
Correction of the Ambient Particle Spectral Light Absorption Measured Using
a Filter-based Aethalometer, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 20,
1833–1841, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.10.0500" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2019.10.0500</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Parameterizations of size distribution and refractive index of biomass burning organic aerosol with black carbon content</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Briggs, N. L., Jaffe, D. A., Gao, H., Hee, J. R., Baylon, P. M., Zhang, Q.,
Zhou, S., Collier, S. C., Sampson, P. D., and Cary, R. A.: Particulate
Matter, Ozone, and Nitrogen Species in Aged Wildfire Plumes Observed at the
Mount Bachelor Observatory, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 16, 3075–3087,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.03.0120" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.03.0120</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Brown, H., Liu, X., Pokhrel, R., Murphy, S., Lu, Z., Saleh, R., Mielonen,
T., Kokkola, H., Bergman, T., Myhre, G., Skeie, R. B., Watson-Paris, D.,
Stier, P., Johnson, B., Bellouin, N., Schulz, M., Vakkari, V., Beukes, J.
P., van Zyl, P. G., Liu, S., and Chand, D.: Biomass burning aerosols in most
climate models are too absorbing, Nat. Commun., 12, 277​​​​​​​,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Chen, L., Li, Q., Wu, D., Sun, H., Wei, Y., Ding, X., Chen, H., Cheng, T.,
and Chen, J.: Size distribution and chemical composition of primary
particles emitted during open biomass burning processes: Impacts on cloud
condensation nuclei activation, Sci. Total Environ., 674,
179–188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.419" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.419</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Z., Atwi, K., Onyima, T., and Saleh, R.: Investigating the dependence
of light-absorption properties of combustion carbonaceous aerosols on
combustion conditions, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 419–434,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1566593" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1566593</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G., Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>de Sá, S. S., Rizzo, L. V., Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Yee, L. D., Wernis, R., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Liu, Y. J., Sedlacek, A., Springston, S., Goldstein, A. H., Barbosa, H. M. J., Alexander, M. L., Artaxo, P., Jimenez, J. L., and Martin, S. T.: Contributions of biomass-burning, urban, and biogenic emissions to the concentrations and light-absorbing properties of particulate matter in central Amazonia during the dry season, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7973–8001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7973-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7973-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Dentener, F., Kinne, S., Bond, T., Boucher, O., Cofala, J., Generoso, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Hoelzemann, J. J., Ito, A., Marelli, L., Penner, J. E., Putaud, J.-P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., van der Werf, G. R., and Wilson, J.: Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750 prescribed data-sets for AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4321–4344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Gysel, M., Crosier, J., Topping, D. O., Whitehead, J. D., Bower, K. N., Cubison, M. J., Williams, P. I., Flynn, M. J., McFiggans, G. B., and Coe, H.: Closure study between chemical composition and hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles during TORCH2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 6131–6144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L. and Malm, W. C.: Review of aerosol mass scattering efficiencies
from ground-based measurements since 1990, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D16203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008484" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008484</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Hecobian, A., Liu, Z., Hennigan, C. J., Huey, L. G., Jimenez, J. L., Cubison, M. J., Vay, S., Diskin, G. S., Sachse, G. W., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Weinheimer, A. J., Liao, J., Knapp, D. J., Wennberg, P. O., Kürten, A., Crounse, J. D., Clair, J. St., Wang, Y., and Weber, R. J.: Comparison of chemical characteristics of 495 biomass burning plumes intercepted by the NASA DC-8 aircraft during the ARCTAS/CARB-2008 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13325–13337, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13325-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13325-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Hoffer, A., Tóth, Á., Pósfai, M., Chung, C. E., and Gelencsér, A.: Brown carbon absorption in the red and near-infrared spectral region, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2353–2359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2353-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2353-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Janhäll, S., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Biomass burning aerosol emissions from vegetation fires: particle number and mass emission factors and size distributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1427–1439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1427-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1427-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb,
C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for
Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 33, 49–70, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Kasthuriarachchi, N. Y., Rivellini, L.-H., Adam, M. G., and Lee, A. K. Y.:
Light Absorbing Properties of Primary and Secondary Brown Carbon in a
Tropical Urban Environment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 10808–10819,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02414" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02414</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Kuang, Y., Zhao, C., Tao, J., Bian, Y., Ma, N., and Zhao, G.: A novel method for deriving the aerosol hygroscopicity parameter based only on measurements from a humidified nephelometer system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6651–6662, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6651-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6651-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Kuang, Y., He, Y., Xu, W., Zhao, P., Cheng, Y., Zhao, G., Tao, J., Ma, N., Su, H., Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Cheng, P., Yang, W., Zhang, S., Wu, C., Sun, Y., and Zhao, C.: Distinct diurnal variation in organic aerosol hygroscopicity and its relationship with oxygenated organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 865–880, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-865-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-865-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Kuang, Y., Huang, S., Xue, B., Luo, B., Song, Q., Chen, W., Hu, W., Li, W., Zhao, P., Cai, M., Peng, Y., Qi, J., Li, T., Wang, S., Chen, D., Yue, D., Yuan, B., and Shao, M.: Contrasting effects of secondary organic aerosol formations on organic aerosol hygroscopicity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10375–10391, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10375-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10375-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M., Zorn, S. R., and Martin, S. T.: Using Elemental Ratios to
Predict the Density of Organic Material Composed of Carbon, Hydrogen, and
Oxygen, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 787–794,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202525q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es202525q</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A. and Cappa, C. D.: Impact of brown and clear carbon on light absorption enhancement, single scatter albedo and absorption wavelength dependence of black carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4207–4220, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Laing, J. R., Jaffe, D. A., and Hee, J. R.: Physical and optical properties of aged biomass burning aerosol from wildfires in Siberia and the Western USA at the Mt. Bachelor Observatory, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15185–15197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15185-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15185-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric
Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Levin, E. J. T., McMeeking, G. R., Carrico, C. M., Mack, L. E., Kreidenweis,
S. M., Wold, C. E., Moosmüller, H., Arnott, W. P., Hao, W. M., Collett
Jr, J. L., and Malm, W. C.: Biomass burning smoke aerosol properties
measured during Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiments (FLAME), J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D18210,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013601" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013601</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Li, Z., Tan, H., Zheng, J., Liu, L., Qin, Y., Wang, N., Li, F., Li, Y., Cai, M., Ma, Y., and Chan, C. K.: Light absorption properties and potential sources of particulate brown carbon in the Pearl River Delta region of China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11669–11685, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11669-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11669-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Liu, D. T., Li, S. Y., Hu, D. W., Kong, S. F., Cheng, Y., Wu, Y. Z., Ding,
S., Hu, K., Zheng, S. R., Yan, Q., Zheng, H., Zhao, D. L., Tian, P., Ye, J.
H., Huang, M. Y., and Ding, D. P.: Evolution of Aerosol Optical Properties
from Wood Smoke in Real Atmosphere Influenced by Burning Phase and Solar
Radiation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 5677–5688, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07569" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07569</a>,
2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, D., Ding, P., Shen, C., Shen, K., He, Q.,
Ding, X., Wang, X., Chen, D., Szidat, S., and Zhang, G.: Source
apportionment using radiocarbon and organic tracers for PM<sub>2.5</sub> carbonaceous
aerosols in Guangzhou, South China: contrasting local- and regional-scale
haze events, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12002–12011,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es503102w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es503102w</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Andersson, A., Zhong, G., Geng, X., Ding, P., Zhu, S., Cheng, Z.,
Zakaria, M. P., Bong, C. W., Li, J., Zheng, J., Zhang, G., and Gustafsson,
Ö.: Isotope constraints of the strong influence of biomass burning to
climate-forcing Black Carbon aerosols over Southeast Asia, Sci.
Total Environ., 744, 140359,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140359" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140359</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Liu, L., Cheng, Y., Wang, S., Wei, C., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöhlker, C., Artaxo, P., Shrivastava, M., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., and Su, H.: Impact of biomass burning aerosols on radiation, clouds, and precipitation over the Amazon: relative importance of aerosol–cloud and aerosol–radiation interactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13283–13301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13283-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13283-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., Winijkul, E., Yan, F., Chen, Y., Bond, T. C., Feng,
Y., Dubey, M. K., Liu, S., Pinto, J. P., and Carmichael, G. R.: Light
Absorption Properties and Radiative Effects of Primary Organic Aerosol
Emissions, Environmental Sci. Technol., 49, 4868–4877,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00211</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>McClure, C. D., Lim, C. Y., Hagan, D. H., Kroll, J. H., and Cappa, C. D.: Biomass-burning-derived particles from a wide variety of fuels – Part 1: Properties of primary particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1531–1547, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1531-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1531-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>McMeeking, G. R., Kreidenweis, S. M., Carrico, C. M., Lee, T., Collett Jr.,
J. L., and Malm, W. C.: Observations of smoke-influenced aerosol during the
Yosemite Aerosol Characterization Study: Size distributions and chemical
composition, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D09206,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005389" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005389</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Okoshi, R., Rasheed, A., Chen Reddy, G., McCrowey, C. J., and Curtis, D. B.:
Size and mass distributions of ground-level sub-micrometer biomass burning
aerosol from small wildfires, Atmos. Environ., 89, 392–402,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.024</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Pokhrel, R. P., Wagner, N. L., Langridge, J. M., Lack, D. A., Jayarathne, T., Stone, E. A., Stockwell, C. E., Yokelson, R. J., and Murphy, S. M.: Parameterization of single-scattering albedo (SSA) and absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) with EC∕OC for aerosol emissions from biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9549–9561, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Pratt, K. A., Murphy, S. M., Subramanian, R., DeMott, P. J., Kok, G. L., Campos, T., Rogers, D. C., Prenni, A. J., Heymsfield, A. J., Seinfeld, J. H., and Prather, K. A.: Flight-based chemical characterization of biomass burning aerosols within two prescribed burn smoke plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12549–12565, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12549-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12549-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Qin, Y. M., Tan, H. B., Li, Y. J., Li, Z. J., Schurman, M. I., Liu, L., Wu, C., and Chan, C. K.: Chemical characteristics of brown carbon in atmospheric particles at a suburban site near Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16409–16418, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16409-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16409-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Qiu, J., Tan, W., Zhao, G., Yu, Y., and Zhao, C.: New correction method for the scattering coefficient measurements of a three-wavelength nephelometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4879–4891, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4879-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4879-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S. and Hobbs, P. V.: Physical and optical properties of young
smoke from individual biomass fires in Brazil, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 103, 32013–32030, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00159</a>,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Eck, T. F., Christopher, S. A., Koppmann, R., Dubovik, O., Eleuterio, D. P., Holben, B. N., Reid, E. A., and Zhang, J.: A review of biomass burning emissions part III: intensive optical properties of biomass burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 827–849, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-827-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-827-2005</a>, 2005a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Koppmann, R., Eck, T. F., and Eleuterio, D. P.: A review of biomass burning emissions part II: intensive physical properties of biomass burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 799–825, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-799-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-799-2005</a>, 2005b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., and Curtis, J. H.: Aerosol
Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts, Rev. Geophys.,
57, 187–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Sakamoto, K. M., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Taylor, J. W., Duck, T. J., and Pierce, J. R.: Aged boreal biomass-burning aerosol size distributions from BORTAS 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1633–1646, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1633-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1633-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Sakamoto, K. M., Laing, J. R., Stevens, R. G., Jaffe, D. A., and Pierce, J. R.: The evolution of biomass-burning aerosol size distributions due to coagulation: dependence on fire and meteorological details and parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7709–7724, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7709-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7709-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Hennigan, C. J., McMeeking, G. R., Chuang, W. K., Robinson, E. S., Coe, H., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Absorptivity of brown carbon in fresh and photo-chemically aged biomass-burning emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7683–7693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7683-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7683-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Robinson, E. S., Tkacik, D. S., Ahern, A. T., Liu, S., Aiken, A.
C., Sullivan, R. C., Presto, A. A., Dubey, M. K., Yokelson, R. J., Donahue,
N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Brownness of organics in aerosols from biomass
burning linked to their black carbon content, Nat. Geosci., 7, 647–650​​​​​​​, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/Ngeo2220" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/Ngeo2220</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Marks, M., Heo, J., Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson,
A. L.: Contribution of brown carbon and lensing to the direct radiative
effect of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and biofuel burning emissions,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 10285–10296,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Saleh, R.: From Measurements to Models: Toward Accurate Representation of
Brown Carbon in Climate Calculations, Current Pollution Reports, 6, 90–104,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00139-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00139-3</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Stier, P., Feichter, J., Kinne, S., Kloster, S., Vignati, E., Wilson, J., Ganzeveld, L., Tegen, I., Werner, M., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Minikin, A., and Petzold, A.: The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1125–1156, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Tan, H., Liu, L., Fan, S., Li, F., Yin, Y., Cai, M., and Chan, P. W.:
Aerosol optical properties and mixing state of black carbon in the Pearl
River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 131, 196–208,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.003</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., Zhang, L., Wu, Z., Cheng, P., Li, M., Chen, L., Zhang, R., and Cao, J.: Impact of particle number and mass size distributions of major chemical components on particle mass scattering efficiency in urban Guangzhou in southern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8471–8490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8471-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8471-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Surapipith, V., Han, Z., Prapamontol, T., Kawichai, S., Zhang, L.,
Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., Li, J., Li, J., Yang, Y., and Zhang, R.: High mass
absorption efficiency of carbonaceous aerosols during the biomass burning
season in Chiang Mai of northern Thailand, Atmos. Environ., 240, 117821,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117821" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117821</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Nie, W., Cheng, Y., Shen, Y., Chi, X., Wang, J., Huang, X., Xie, Y., Sun, P., Xu, Z., Qi, X., Su, H., and Ding, A.: Light absorption of brown carbon in eastern China based on 3-year multi-wavelength aerosol optical property observations and an improved absorption Ångström exponent segregation method, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9061–9074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9061-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9061-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Q., Saturno, J., Chi, X., Walter, D., Lavric, J. V., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Ditas, F., Pöhlker, C., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Modeling investigation of light-absorbing aerosols in the Amazon Basin during the wet season, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14775–14794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14775-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14775-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Sedlacek, A. J., de Sá, S. S., Martin, S. T., Alexander, M. L., Watson, T. B., Aiken, A. C., Springston, S. R., and Artaxo, P.: Deriving brown carbon from multiwavelength absorption measurements: method and application to AERONET and Aethalometer observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12733–12752, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12733-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12733-2016</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Wu, D., Mao, J., Deng, X., Tie, X., Zhang, Y., Zeng, L., Li, F., Tan, H.,
Bi, X., Huang, X., Chen, J., and Deng, T.: Black carbon aerosols and their
radiative properties in the Pearl River Delta region, Sci. China
Ser. D, 52, 1152–1163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-009-0115-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-009-0115-y</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Xie, M., Hays, M. D., and Holder, A. L.: Light-absorbing organic carbon from
prescribed and laboratory biomass burning and gasoline vehicle emissions,
Scientific Reports, 7, 7318​​​​​​​, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Yang, M., Howell, S. G., Zhuang, J., and Huebert, B. J.: Attribution of aerosol light absorption to black carbon, brown carbon, and dust in China – interpretations of atmospheric measurements during EAST-AIRE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2035–2050, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2035-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2035-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Yu, Z., Cheng, Z., Magoon, G. R., Hajj, O. E., and Saleh, R.:
Characterization of light-absorbing aerosols from a laboratory combustion
source with two different photoacoustic techniques, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 55, 387–397, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1849537" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1849537</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Yus-Díez, J., Bernardoni, V., Močnik, G., Alastuey, A., Ciniglia, D., Ivančič, M., Querol, X., Perez, N., Reche, C., Rigler, M., Vecchi, R., Valentini, S., and Pandolfi, M.: Determination of the multiple-scattering correction factor and its cross-sensitivity to scattering and wavelength dependence for different AE33 Aethalometer filter tapes: a multi-instrumental approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6335–6355, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6335-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6335-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, A., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Weber, R. J., Song, Y., Ke, Z., and Zou, Y.: Modeling the global radiative effect of brown carbon: a potentially larger heating source in the tropical free troposphere than black carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1901–1920, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1901-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1901-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, G., Peng, L., Lian, X., Lin, Q., Bi, X., Chen, D., Li, M., Li, L.,
Wang, X., and Sheng, G.: An Improved Absorption Ångström Exponent
(AAE)-Based Method for Evaluating the Contribution of Light Absorption from
Brown Carbon with a High-Time Resolution, Aerosol Air Qual. Res.,
19, 15–24, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.12.0566" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.12.0566</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, G., Tao, J., Kuang, Y., Shen, C., Yu, Y., and Zhao, C.: Role of black carbon mass size distribution in the direct aerosol radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13175–13188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13175-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13175-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, G., Yu, Y., Tian, P., Li, J., Guo, S., and Zhao, C.: Evaluation and
Correction of the Ambient Particle Spectral Light Absorption Measured Using
a Filter-based Aethalometer, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 20,
1833–1841, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.10.0500" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.10.0500</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
