<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-9173-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Mixing state of refractory black carbon aerosol in the South Asian outflow over the northern Indian Ocean during winter</article-title><alt-title>Mixing state of rBC aerosol in the South Asian outflow</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Mixing state of rBC aerosol in the South Asian outflow}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S. K. Kompalli et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kompalli</surname><given-names>Sobhan Kumar</given-names></name>
          <email>sobhanspl@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3944-3207</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Babu</surname><given-names>Surendran Nair Suresh</given-names></name>
          <email>sureshsplvssc@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Moorthy</surname><given-names>Krishnaswamy Krishna</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7234-3868</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3 aff5">
          <name><surname>Satheesh</surname><given-names>Sreedharan Krishnakumari</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gogoi</surname><given-names>Mukunda Madhab</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nair</surname><given-names>Vijayakumar S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8236-3590</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jayachandran</surname><given-names>Venugopalan Nair</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7486-3947</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff6">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Dantong</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3768-1770</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Flynn</surname><given-names>Michael J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Coe</surname><given-names>Hugh</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3264-1713</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Space Physics Laboratory, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Centre for Atmospheric &amp; Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Centre for Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>DST-Centre of Excellence in Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Department of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Surendran Nair Suresh Babu (sureshsplvssc@gmail.com) <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> and Sobhan Kumar Kompalli (sobhanspl@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>9173</fpage><lpage>9199</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>August</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>1</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e202">Regional climatic implications of aerosol black carbon (BC), which has a wide variety of anthropogenic sources in large abundance, are well recognized over South Asia. Significant uncertainties remain in its quantification due to a lack of sufficient information on the microphysical properties (its concentration, size, and mixing state with other aerosol components) that determine the absorption potential of BC. In particular, the information on the mixing state of BC is extremely sparse over this region. In this study, the first observations of the size distribution and mixing state of individual refractory black carbon (rBC) particles in the South Asian outflow to the south-eastern Arabian Sea and the northern and equatorial Indian Ocean regions are presented based on measurements using a single particle soot photometer (SP2) aboard the Integrated Campaign for Aerosols, gases, and Radiation Budget (ICARB-2018) ship during winter 2018 (16 January to 13 February). The results revealed significant spatial heterogeneity of BC characteristics. The highest rBC mass concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">938</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">293</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the highest relative coating thickness (RCT; the ratio of BC core to its coating diameters) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are found over the south-east Arabian Sea (SEAS) region, which is in the proximity of the continental outflow. As we move to farther oceanic regions, though the mass concentrations decreased by nearly half (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">546</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), BC still remained thickly coated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RCT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The air over the remote equatorial Indian Ocean, which received considerable marine air masses compared to the other regions, showed the lowest rBC mass concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">114</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a moderately thick coating (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RCT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.73</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Even over oceanic regions far from the landmass, regions that received the outflow from the more industrialized east coast/the Bay of Bengal had a thicker coating (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">104</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) compared to regions that received outflow from the west coast and/or peninsular India (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm). Although different regions of the ocean depicted contrasting concentrations and mixing state parameters due to the varied extent and nature of the continental outflow as well as the atmospheric lifetime of air masses, the modal parameters of rBC mass–size distributions (mean mass median diameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19–0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were similar over all regions. The mean fraction of BC-containing particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) varied in the range of 0.08–0.12 (suggesting significant amounts of non-BC particles), whereas the bulk mixing ratio of coating mass to rBC mass was highest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the outflow regions compared to the remote ocean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), highlighting the role of outflow in providing condensable material for coatings on rBC. These parameters, along with the information on the size-resolved mixing state of BC cores, throw light on the role of sources and secondary processing of their complex mixtures<?pagebreak page9174?> for coatings on BC under highly polluted conditions. Examination of the non-refractory sub-micrometre aerosol chemical composition obtained using the aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) suggested that the overall aerosol system was sulfate-dominated over the far-oceanic regions. In contrast, organics were equally prominent adjacent to the coastal landmass. An association between the BC mixing state and aerosol chemical composition suggested that sulfate was the probable dominant coating material on rBC cores.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e427">Black carbon (BC) is the dominant light-absorbing atmospheric aerosol species that perturbs regional and global radiation balance through the positive radiative forcing arising out of its strong absorption of solar radiation and its ability to reduce cloud albedo (Menon et al., 2002; Ramanathan and Carmichael, 2008; IPCC, 2013; Bond et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2016). Produced by the incomplete combustion of hydrocarbon fuels, BC has a global direct radiative forcing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), of which fossil fuel and biofuel emissions contribute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; the rest is from biomass burning (Bond et al.,  2013). Such large forcing due to BC is reported to be capable of causing significant perturbations to atmospheric circulation, cloud dynamics, rainfall pattern, static stability, and convective activity over regional scales, especially over the Indian region (Menon et al., 2002; Ramanathan et al., 2005; Meehl et al., 2008; Bollasina et al., 2008; Lawrence and Lelieveld, 2010; Babu et al., 2011; D'Errico et al., 2015; Boos and Storelvmo, 2016). While fresh BC is fractal-like, hydrophobic, and externally mixed, atmospheric ageing (temporally and/or chemically) results in internally mixed BC with hydrophilic compounds (e.g., organic acids and ammonium sulfate) and an altered mixing state, size, and morphology. Also, the ageing process leads to enhanced absorption potential of BC (Schnaiter et al., 2005; Shiraiwa et al., 2010; Cappa et al., 2012, 2019; Zhang et al., 2015; Peng et al., 2016; Ueda et al., 2016). The mixing state of BC is a vital parameter that determines its optical and radiative properties (Moffet and Prather, 2009; Liu et al., 2017) and is a critical input parameter for the models used to estimate BC direct radiative forcing (Bond et al., 2013). The information on the nature of the coating material along with the state of mixing of BC particles gives insight into the magnitude of the mixing-induced absorption enhancement for BC (Cappa et al., 2012, 2019; Peng et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017). Further, the coating of other soluble species on BC modifies its hygroscopicity and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity (McMeeking et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2013; Laborde et al., 2013) and, therefore, the mixing state alters BC-induced cloud changes and indirect radiative effects. Thus, the characterization of BC size and its mixing state is critical to reducing the uncertainties in its direct and indirect radiative effects (Jacobson, 2001; Bond et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e522">The BC sources are highly varied, both seasonally and spatially, over the Indian region (e.g., Kompalli et al., 2014a; Prasad et al., 2018, and references therein). Aerosol BC has an average atmospheric lifetime of about a week (Lund et al., 2018; Bond et al., 2013). It is prone to regional as well as long-range transport during its short atmospheric lifetime and found even over remote regions, such as the polar regions, albeit in lower concentrations (Raatikainen et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015; Sharma et al., 2017; Zanatta et al., 2018). The alteration to BC mixing state depends on various factors, which include the BC size distribution, nature of sources, the concentration of condensable materials that BC encounters during its atmospheric lifetime, and processes such as photochemical ageing (Liu et al., 2013; Ueda et al., 2016; Miyakawa et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018). Consequently, the nature and extent of coating on BC vary in space and time and, as such, BC in a polluted environment chemically ages faster than in a relatively clean environment (e.g., Peng et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2010, 2019; Cappa et al., 2019). This calls for region-specific characterization of the spatio-temporal variability of the BC mixing state. This is particularly important over the South Asian region (with rapidly increasing anthropogenic activities and enhanced emissions from a variety of sources) and its outflow into the adjoining oceans (Lawrence and Lelieveld, 2010; Babu et al., 2013; IPCC, 2013). Aerosol BC over this region has a wide variety of sources (industrial and vehicular emissions, biomass, crop residue, and residential fuel burning) and is co-emitted with a broad spectrum of gaseous compounds that form secondary aerosol species such as sulfates, nitrates, phosphates, and secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) (Gustafsson et al., 2009; Pandey et al.,  2014) leading to complex mixing states of BC during its atmospheric chemical ageing. The absorption potential of the resultant mixed-phase particles would be quite different from those of nascent BC (Lawrence and Lelieveld, 2010; Srivastava and Ramachandran, 2013; Srinivas and Sarin, 2014; Moorthy et al., 2016). When air masses from such complex source regions are transported to remote regions devoid of any sources of BC, the mixing state of BC may change. This is due to (a) the restructuring of the BC aggregates during the transport due to different processes (Kütz and Schmidt-Ott, 1992; Weingartner et al., 1995; Slowik et al., 2007b; Pagels et al., 2009) and (b) the varied nature and amounts of coating material arising due to the different atmospheric lifetimes and microphysical processes involving different species (McFiggans et al., 2015). Therefore, the characterization of aerosol and trace species properties has gained much attention over the years. Lawrence and Lelieveld (2010) have highlighted many field experiments that attempted to assess the impact of continental outflow of anthropogenic emissions from South Asia to the surrounding oceanic regions and its climate implications. Past field campaigns, such as the Indian Ocean Experiment (INDOEX)<?pagebreak page9175?> during 1998–1999 (Ramanathan et al., 2001) and the Integrated Campaign for Aerosols, gases, and Radiation Budget (ICARB) during March–May 2006 (phase 1) and December–January 2008/09 (phase 2) (Moorthy et al., 2008; Babu et al., 2012; Kompalli et al., 2013), have characterized regional aerosols over the northern Indian Ocean during different seasons.</p>
      <p id="d1e525">However, the information on BC microphysical properties (especially its size distribution, mixing state, and extent of coating) over the northern Indian Ocean has remained elusive primarily due to a lack of instruments for near real-time measurements to estimate BC size and coating (Kompalli et al., 2020b). A combination of analytical instruments, such as the single particle soot photometer (SP2) based on the laser-induced incandescence technique for the measurements of microphysical properties of refractory BC (rBC) at a single particle level (Moteki and Kondo, 2007; Schwarz et al., 2008, 2013; Laborde et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014), the mass spectroscopy-based aerosol chemical composition measurements (Liu et al., 2014; Gong et al., 2016) such as the aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) (Jayne et al., 2000; Jimenez et al., 2003; Allan et al., 2003), or the aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) (Ng et al., 2011) that provide near real-time information on the possible coating substances, provides a way to address this issue (Kompalli et al., 2020b, and references therein).</p>
      <p id="d1e528">In this study, we report the first measurements of BC microphysical properties over the south-eastern Arabian Sea and the northern and equatorial Indian Ocean regions. The observations were carried out as a part of the third phase of the Integrated Campaign for Aerosols, gases, and Radiation Budget (ICARB) campaign during the winter season when the abovementioned oceanic regions are strongly impacted by the South Asian outflow aided by the favourable synoptic winds (Lawrence and Lelieveld, 2010; Nair et al., 2020). The weak winds and absence of strong precipitation during this season are conducive to longer atmospheric lifetimes and support inter-hemispheric transport of the pollutants. The main aims of our measurements included: (i) characterization of the spatio-temporal variation of BC size distributions over the northern Indian Ocean, (ii) examination of the extent of BC transport from distinct source regions and changes to its mixing state during the transport to the ocean, and (iii) quantification of the degree of coating on BC and identification of the nature of potential coating species by using concurrent chemical composition measurements during the South Asian outflow. The results of the campaign are presented and implications discussed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental measurements</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Campaign details and meteorology</title>
      <p id="d1e546">Phase 3 of the Integrated Campaign for Aerosols, gases, and Radiation Budget cruise-based experiment (hereafter referred to as the ICARB-2018) was carried out during the winter period (16 January–13 February 2018) along the track shown by the solid black line in Fig. 1, covering different parts of the south-eastern Arabian Sea (SEAS), the northern Indian Ocean (NIO), and the equatorial Indian Ocean (EIO), as highlighted by the different boxes about the track. More details about the experiment and sampling conditions are available in earlier publications (Gogoi et al., 2019; Nair et al., 2020; Kompalli et al., 2020a). Briefly, the measurements were made from the specially configured aerosol laboratory on the top deck of the ship, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m above the sea level, and the instruments sampled air from a community aerosol inlet set up with an upper size cut-off at 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a flow rate of 16.67 litres per minute (LPM). Membrane-based dryers were installed in the sampling lines to remove the excess moisture (to limit the sampling relative humidity (RH) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). Proper care was taken to avoid  contamination from the ship's emissions by aligning the bow of the ship against the wind direction, and any spurious data were removed during post-processing (as has been done in earlier such campaigns; Moorthy et al., 2008).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e581">Cruise track of the ICARB-2018 over the northern Indian Ocean from 16 January  to 13 February 2018; the different classified sub-regions are highlighted with shaded portions, and major industrial cities and ports along with coastline are marked with a star symbol. HYSPLIT 5 d isentropic air mass back trajectories arriving at 100 m a.m.s.l. (dashed lines) above the ship location at 05:30 UTC on each day for different sub-regions are shown in different colours. The filled circles on the track indicate the daily mean position of the ship. SEAS: south-east Arabian Sea; NIO-E: northern Indian Ocean-east; EIO: equatorial Indian Ocean; NIO-W: northern Indian Ocean-west; southern Arabian Sea: SAS; this region was affected by rain and a large scale meteorological system. The data from the SAS were not included in the overall analysis.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/9173/2021/acp-21-9173-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e590">The South Asian region is known for its seasonally contrasting synoptic meteorology associated with the Asian monsoon and north–south excursion of the inter-tropical convergence zone (ITCZ) and monsoonal circulations (Das, 1986; Asnani, 1993). During the winter (December to February), calm north-easterly winds prevail over the Indian landmass, which facilitates extensive transport of continental air mass to the surrounding ocean. The synoptic conditions during the campaign period were quite similar to the climatological pattern, as revealed by Fig. S1a in the Supplement, which shows the prevailing synoptic mean wind vectors at 925 hPa derived from ERA-Interim wind data from ECMWF (European Centre for Medium range Weather Forecasting; <uri>https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/data/interim-full-daily/levtype=sfc/</uri>, last access: 25 February 2020) data. The spatial distribution of fire counts over the continental landmass lying upwind of the campaign area, as derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) fire radiative power (MODIS Thermal Anomalies/Fire locations, Collection 6 product obtained from <uri>https://earthdata.nasa.gov/firms</uri>, last access: 24 February 2020) for the period 10 January to 14 February 2018, is shown Fig. S1b in the Supplement. It reveals a significant number of fire events in the upwind regions. Monthly mean tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column abundances obtained from TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) (<uri>http://www.temis.nl/airpollution/no2col/no2regio_tropomi.php</uri>, last access: 27 February 2020) data, shown in the bottom panels<?pagebreak page9176?> of the same figure (for January 2018 see Fig. S1c and for February 2018 see Fig. S1d in the Supplement), show significant emissions over the continental areas upwind, a part of which would be transported to the oceanic regions during the ICARB-2018. Earlier, based on the observations using the optical attenuation technique (aethalometer) over the upwind locations (Kharagpur, Bhubaneswar, Vizag, Trivandrum), Kompalli et al. (2013, 2014b) reported that the highest equivalent black carbon (EBC; optically measured BC) mass concentrations throughout the year are seen during the winter period (mean values ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5389</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1245</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over Trivandrum to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">691</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4457</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over Kharagpur), which highlighted the source strength during this season. Also, the east coast of India is more industrialized compared to the west coast and/or peninsular India (Fig. S1c and d in the Supplement; Moorthy et al., 2005; Kompalli et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e678">Air mass back trajectories derived using the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) (<uri>https://www.arl.noaa.gov/hysplit/ready/</uri>, last access: 20 September  2019) and shown in Fig. 1 highlight the potential long-range transport of the continental emissions to different oceanic regions covered during the campaign. Accordingly, the cruise region is divided into five distinct sub-regions: (i) south-eastern Arabian Sea (SEAS), which encountered direct outflow from the strong source regions in the western coastal and peninsular India region (shown with a blue box and air mass trajectories); (ii) northern Indian Ocean-east (NIO-E) (eastern leg of the cruise covering the NIO region) that experienced air masses from the east coast of India and the Bay of Bengal regions (red); (iii) equatorial Indian Ocean (EIO), where mostly marine air masses originated and/or confined within the north-eastern Arabian Sea and without any direct influence of continental outflow (green); (iv) northern Indian Ocean-west (NIO-W), which experiences outflow mainly from western coastal regions of Peninsular India after considerable transit over the Sea (magenta); and (v) southern Arabian Sea (SAS), the unshaded region of the track where widespread rainfall associated with the passage of a large scale meteorological system was encountered. We have not included the data collected over the SAS region in the overall analysis of the present study, and a brief discussion about it is provided in the Supplement. During the rest of the cruise period, calm winds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and clear sky conditions prevailed with no significant variation in air temperature (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and relative humidity (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">73</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) conditions. Table 1 gives the details of the regional mean (avg), maximum (max) and minimum (min) values of meteorological variables (air temperature (AT), relative humidity (RH), wind speed (WS), wind direction (WD), total accumulated rainfall (RF) amount) for different regions covered during the ICARB-2018.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e755">Regional values of meteorological parameters observed during the cruise period.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Region</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">AT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">RH (%) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">WS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">WD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">RF (mm)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Avg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Min</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Avg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Min</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Avg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Min</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SEAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">76.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">86.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">65.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NIO-E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">69.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">76.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">60.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EIO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">72.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">79.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">65.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NIO-W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">72.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">78.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">66.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">7.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">73.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">81.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">61.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">50.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1103">Of the several measurements made, the measurements of the BC single particle microphysical properties were carried out using a single-particle soot photometer (SP2) (Model: SP2-D; Droplet Measurement Technologies, Boulder, USA), which was operated at a flow rate of 0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The SP2 employs a 1064 nm Nd:YAG intracavity laser and by using a laser-induced incandescence technique, it characterizes the physical properties of refractory BC (rBC) at the individual particle level (Moteki and Kondo, 2007; Schwarz et al., 2008, 2013; Laborde et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014; Shiraiwa et al., 2007; Kompalli et al., 2020b). It provides information about mass and number concentrations and size distributions of rBC. The amplitude of the incandescence signal is proportional to the rBC mass present in the BC-containing particles, and the mass equivalent diameter (the diameter of a sphere containing the same mass of rBC as measured), or BC core diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), is obtained from the measured rBC mass by assuming a density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for atmospheric BC (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; Moteki and Kondo, 2007, 2010; McMeeking et al., 2011). Further, the amplitude of the scattering signal provides information about the scattering cross<?pagebreak page9177?> section of the particles, which is used to determine the optical sizing of the particles. In the case of BC-containing particles, the scattering signal gets distorted as it passes through the laser beam because of the intense thermal heating of the particle and evaporation of the coating. Thus, the scattering signal of the BC particle is reconstructed using a leading-edge only (LEO) fitting technique, as described in earlier publications (Gao et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2010, 2014, 2017), and this scattering cross section is matched with the modelled values in a Mie lookup table to derive the optical diameter of a BC particle or the coated BC size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Here, the total particle is treated as an ideal two-component sphere with a concentric core–shell morphology, with a core (rBC) refractive index value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Moteki et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2014; Taylor et al., 2015) and a coating refractive index of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (which is an optimum value and in the range of refractive indices of inorganic salts (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and secondary organic aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.5) at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1064</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm (Schnaiter et al., 2005; Metcalf et al., 2012; Lambe et al., 2013; Laborde et al., 2013; Taylor et al., 2015). These two diameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are used to infer the coating thickness. Before the experiment, the SP2 was calibrated using Aquadag<sup>®</sup> black carbon particle standards (Aqueous Deflocculated Acheson Graphite, manufactured by Acheson Inc., USA), and a correction factor of 0.75 is applied to address the difference between Aquadag<sup>®</sup> standards and ambient BC (e.g., Moteki and Kondo 2010; Laborde et al., 2012). A detailed description of the instrument, data interpretation procedures, uncertainties, and caveats involved can be found elsewhere (Liu et al., 2010, 2014; McMeeking et al., 2010; Sedlacek et al., 2012, 2018; Kompalli et al., 2020b). It is recognized that the SP2 cannot provide the details of rBC aggregate morphology or the relative position of the BC within the particle, which can be determined better through microscopy-based studies (e.g., Adachi et al., 2010; Ueda et al., 2018). However, the intensity of the incandescence signal detected by the SP2 is proportional to the refractory black carbon mass present in the particle and is independent of particle morphology and mixing state (Slowik et al., 2007a; Moteki and Kondo, 2007; Schwarz et al., 2008). Again, though the SP2 has limited detection sensitivity towards pure scatterers because of the limited size range it covers, the light scattering information at 1064 nm has been widely used to accurately derive the size of the coated particle (Gao et al., 2007; Moteki et al., 2010; Shiraiwa et al., 2008, 2010; Laborde et al., 2013; Taylor et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e1295">Supplementing the above, we  used the information on the mass concentration of non-refractory <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols (organics, sulfate, ammonium, nitrate, and chloride) from a collocated aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM; Model: 140; Aerodyne, USA) (Ng et al., 2011). The objective here is to identify the possible coating material on rBC particles. The ACSM consists of a particle sampling inlet, three vacuum chambers (differentially pumped by turbopumps, backed by the main diaphragm pump), and a residual gas analyser (RGA) mass spectrometer (Pfeiffer Vacuum GmbH). The particles are drawn to an aerodynamic lens assembly having <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> limits (50 % transmission range) of 75–650 nm and 30 % to 40 % transmission efficiency at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Liu et al., 2007) through a 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> critical orifice. These particles are focused into a narrow beam and transmitted to a vacuum environment where they are flash vaporized by the thermal capture vaporizer (Xu et al., 2017; Hu et al.,  2017a, b) operating at 525 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Subsequently, these vapours are ionized via 70 eV electron impact ionization and detected with a quadrupole mass spectrometer. The data are processed as per the prescribed methodology (Ng et al., 2011; Middlebrook et al., 2012; Kompalli et al., 2020b). We used software provided by the manufacturer (Aerodyne Research, ACSM Local, version 1.6.0.3, within IGOR Pro version 7.0.4.1) for processing and analysis of data. Using the default fragmentation table (Allan et al., 2004), the measured fractions of unit mass resolution spectra signals were apportioned to individual aerosol species. The required corrections for the instrument performance for the varied inlet pressures and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal were performed (Ng et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2012). Mass-dependent ion transmission efficiency correction of the residual gas analyser was carried out using the signals from the internal diffuse naphthalene source (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 128). The calibrations of ionization efficiency (IE) and relative IE (RIE) calibrations were performed prior to the experiment by using monodisperse (300 nm) particles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Jayne et al., 2000; Allan et al., 2003; Jimenez et al., 2003; Canagaratna et al., 2007). The present ACSM consists of a capture vaporizer with an inner cavity to reduce the particle bounce (Xu et al., 2017), resulting in a higher collection<?pagebreak page9178?> efficiency (about unity) (Hu et al., 2017a, b). Therefore, the composition-dependent collection efficiency correction prescribed by Middlebrook et al. (2012), applicable to standard vaporizer instruments, was not applied to our data. More than 1200 quality checked individual observations with a time resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min formed the database for this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e1425">Continuous measurements of the particle number size distributions in the size range of 10 to 414 nm were also carried out aboard, at the 5 min interval, using a scanning mobility particle sizer spectrometer (SMPS; TSI Inc., USA) during the campaign (Kompalli et al., 2020a). The SMPS consists of an electrostatic classifier (TSI 3080), a long differential mobility analyser to size segregate the particles based on their electrical motilities (Wiedensohler, 1988) that are subsequently counted by using a water-based condensation particle counter (TSI 3786). Concurrent measurements of the particle number size distributions in the aerodynamic diameters range of 542 to 19 800 nm (which can be converted to stokes diameters using an effective particle density) have also been made using the aerodynamic particle sizer (APS; Make: TSI, Model: 3321) that works based on the “time-of-flight” technique (Leith and Peters, 2003). Though the contribution from the particles in the sizes measured by the APS to the overall aerosol number concentrations are found to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %; combining both these measurements gives the total particle number concentrations covering a wide size range (10–10 000 nm). We have used the particle number size distributions (and total particle number concentrations) from 10–1000 nm from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SMPS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>APS</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, along with the number concentration of rBC from the SP2 to estimate the fraction of rBC-containing particles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1458">The extent of coating on rBC particles is quantified in terms of the bulk relative coating thickness (RCT) defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are coated and core BC particle diameters, respectively. It is estimated by dividing the total volume of coated BC with that of rBC cores in a given time window (5 min in our case) following Liu et al. (2014, 2019):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M68" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mroot><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mroot><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the diameters of coated and core rBC, respectively, for each single particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition to RCT, we have used bulk volume-weighted absolute coating thickness (ACT, in nm), defined as (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> used here are volume averaged diameters) based on the assumption of a concentric core–shell morphology, as another diagnostic of the coating on the population of rBC particles (Gong et al., 2016; Cheng et al., 2018; Brooks et al., 2019). More details about the parameters bulk RCT and ACT, the methodology used here, and uncertainties associated were described elsewhere (Liu et al., 2017, 2019; Sedlacek et al., 2018; Brooks et al., 2019; Kompalli et al., 2020b).</p>
      <p id="d1e1652">The means of the mass median diameter (MMD) and number median diameter (NMD) were determined from the size distributions of BC cores for each time window by least squares fitting to an analytical monomodal log-normal distribution (Liu et al., 2010, 2014; Kompalli et al., 2020b) of the following form:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M75" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to mass/number concentration of the mode, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass/number median diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is particle diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mass/number concentrations in an infinitesimal diameter interval <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the geometric standard deviation (of the median diameter).</p>
      <p id="d1e1816">Using the bulk RCT and MMD of the BC cores, the volume-weighted coated BC size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is calculated as below to indicate the mean coated BC size:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M83" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Since the ratio of the mass of non-absorbing coating material to the rBC core is an important parameter in determining the degree of absorption enhancement of BC, we quantified their mixing in terms of the bulk mixing ratio of coating mass over rBC mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) derived by assuming densities for the bulk coating (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>coating</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and rBC core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rBCcore</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Liu et al., 2019) as below:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M88" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>coating</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rBCcore</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Here we have used the effective dry density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>coating</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of ambient NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the measured near real-time chemical composition (Budisulistiorini et al., 2016) by assuming densities of organics and inorganics as 1.4 (Hallquist et al., 2009) and 1.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Park et al., 2004), respectively.</p>
      <?pagebreak page9179?><p id="d1e2032">To explore the distribution of BC core-coatings, a parameter of scattering enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each single particle is determined using the expression (Liu et al., 2014, 2019):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M93" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>measured</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>coatedBC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>calculated</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>uncoatedBC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the term in the numerator is the scattered light intensity of the coated rBC particle measured by the scattering detector of the SP2 and reconstructed using the LEO technique, while the denominator is the scattering intensity of the uncoated BC calculated using Mie single particle scattering solutions assuming sphericity (Liu et al., 2014, 2019; Taylor et al., 2014; Brooks et al., 2019). For this purpose, the measured rBC mass and a refractive index of BC of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Moteki et al., 2010) at the SP2 laser wavelength, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1064</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm, were used. For an uncoated rBC particle, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is equal to 1, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with an increased coating at a given core size. Combined with rBC core diameters and coating parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is helpful in identifying the nature of sources, though under the assumption that no material loss via oxidative and/or photochemistry occurs, which can either alter overall particle size and/or the refractive index of the coating.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Spatial distribution of rBC mass/number concentrations and size distributions</title>
      <p id="d1e2161">The spatial variations of the number and mass concentrations of refractory BC core particles during the cruise are shown in Fig. 2, along with the statistics over different regions depicted using the box-and-whisker plots.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2166">Spatial distribution and  box-and-whisker plots of refractory BC (rBC) number <bold>(a, c)</bold> and mass concentrations <bold>(b, d)</bold>. The colour scale in the spatial map <bold>(a, b)</bold> indicates the magnitude of the property. Rectangles with dashed borders highlight different sub-regions. The box-and-whisker plots <bold>(c, d)</bold> illustrate the mean (sphere), median (the horizontal bar in the box), 25th and 75th percentile (the lower and upper lines of the box), 5th and 95th percentile (end of error bars), and maximum and minimum values for the regions (as solid stars).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/9173/2021/acp-21-9173-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2187">The highest values and variabilities (standard deviation) in the rBC mass (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">938</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">293</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and number (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">378</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations are noticed over the SEAS region, which is in the proximity of the source regions and/or outflow from the western coast and peninsular India, where industrialized cities and major ports are located (Figs. 1 and S1 in the Supplement). The concentrations decreased gradually by half as the ship headed towards the NIO-E (eastern leg of the NIO), where it received outflow mostly from the east coast and/or the Bay of Bengal regions. The lowest concentrations (which were 4–5 fold lower than the values seen over the SEAS) are observed over the remote EIO region. The lower concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) highlighted the cleaner nature of this region, which encountered mostly oceanic air masses. The concentrations increased again (almost 3-fold compared to the values seen over the EIO region) as the ship traversed to the NIO-W (western leg of the NIO) region, which experienced continental outflow air masses from the west coast and/or peninsular India, similar to the SEAS but farther from the coast and SEAS region. Thus, the concentrations in the NIO-W were lower than those seen in the SEAS and comparable to those seen in its eastern counterpart (NIO-E). This also indicated varied amounts of BC in the outflow from different parts of the peninsula, apparently due to different source strengths and transit times involved. A similar spatial variability pattern was also reported for other aerosol parameters during the present campaign (Gogoi et al., 2019; Nair et al., 2020; Kompalli et al., 2020a).</p>
      <p id="d1e2278">The size distributions of rBC are influenced by the source, sinks, and transformation processes taking place during advection and are known to be important in assessing the light absorption characteristics (Reddington et al., 2013). The MMD values of the rBC size distributions are strongly influenced by the source of BC emissions (e.g., Ko et al., 2020; Cheng et al., 2018). Recently, Ko et al. (2020)  compared the MMD and NMD values of rBC size distributions from different dominant sources. Previous studies report that the MMD (and NMD) values over the regions dominated by fresh fossil fuel emissions are smaller (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to  178 nm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 80 nm) compared to the areas with dominant solid-fuel sources (biomass, biofuel, coal-burning) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">130</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to  210 nm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 140 nm), whereas well-aged and background BC particles in outflow regions have MMD values in between (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">180</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to  225 nm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to  120 nm) (McMeeking et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2010, 2014; Kondo et al., 2011; Cappa et al., 2012; Sahu et al., 2012; Metcalf et al., 2012; Laborde et al., 2013; Reddington et al., 2013; Gong et al., 2016; Raatikainen et al., 2017; Krasowsky et al., 2018; Brooks et al., 2019; Kompalli et al., 2020b; Ko et al., 2020). The spatial distribution of mass median diameter and number median diameters during the ICARB-2018 shown in Fig. 3 was interpreted based on this backdrop. The observed mean NMD (0.10–0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and MMD (0.19–0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values over the entire study region (Fig. 3c and d) are within the range of values reported in earlier studies for chemically aged continental outflow and a combination of sources. Chemical ageing of BC is another important factor affecting the rBC core sizes owing to transformation processes (such as collapsing of the BC cores and/or due to coagulation) taking place during the long-range transport (Shiraiwa et al., 2008; Bond et al., 2013; Ko et al., 2020). Freshly produced BC particles comprise fractal-like aggregates of spherical graphitic monomers with diameters of 10–50 nm (Köylü et al., 1995; Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; Bond et al., 2013; Petzold et al., 2013). However, as they evolve in the atmosphere, restructuring of these aggregates occurs due to the above processes and/or condensation of vapours. Compaction can be induced by capillary forces while vapour condensation fills the voids of the aggregates (capillary condensation) (Weingartner et al., 1995; Pagels et al., 2009; Khalizov et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2018, 2016; Ivanova et al., 2021, and references therein) and/or restructuring driven by surface tension forces at the solid–liquid interfaces during condensation of coating material (Kutz and Schmidt-Ott, 1992; Slowik et al., 2007b; Zhang et al., 2008, 2016; Schnitzler et al., 2017). Recently, Ivanova et al. (2021) presented a detailed account of the above processes. As such, increased ageing (temporal and/or chemical) is more likely to result in compact cores (Liu et al., 2019; Laborde et al., 2013); however, the effectiveness of a condensable vapour to cause restructuring also depends on its chemical composition (Xue et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2016). The observed MMD values in this study reflected such transformation processes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2376">Spatial distribution and the box-and-whisker plots of number median diameter (NMD) <bold>(a, c)</bold> and mass median diameter (MMD) <bold>(b, d)</bold> of rBC core size distributions during the ICARB-2018. The colour scale in the spatial map <bold>(a, b)</bold> indicates the magnitude of the parameter. Rectangles with dashed borders highlight different sub-regions. The box-and-whisker plots <bold>(c, d)</bold> illustrate the mean (sphere), median (the horizontal bar in the box), 25th and 75th percentile (the lower and upper lines of the box), 5th and 95th percentile (end of error bars), and maximum and minimum values for the regions (as solid stars).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/9173/2021/acp-21-9173-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2397">Notably, the NIO-E region depicted a slightly larger mean MMD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) due to frequent larger values (35 % of the measurements showed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to all the other regions (Fig. 3d). This is a result of the following possibilities: (i) Self-coagulation of rBC cores due to enhanced atmospheric ageing during their transport from<?pagebreak page9180?> the source regions on the east coast to the adjacent marine regions (at the same time, sedimentation of larger particles resulting in a large reduction in number concentration and mass concentration). It may be noted that coagulation, even though it increases the rBC core diameters and reduces number concentrations, is a slow process. The coagulation rate depends on the square of the particle number concentrations and is the lowest between particles of the same size. Thus, the coagulation rates would be higher near source regions of the nascent aerosols and drop off gradually at farther distances. (ii) The second and most important possibility is associated with the cloud processing of rBC particles. The less-soluble BC particles remain within a non-precipitating cloud as interstitial particles. A cloud undergoes multiple evaporation–condensation cycles before it transforms into a precipitating system. During such cycles, interstitial BC in cloud droplets can grow larger (especially following the evaporation of cloud droplets containing multiple rBC particles) due to agglomeration with other interstitial rBC aerosols. (iii) The third possibility is the varied nature of dominant sources. A sizable increase in the contribution from solid-fuel sources (biomass/crop residue/coal burning) in the upwind regions (the eastern coast of India) through the transported air masses can lead to larger BC cores (Brooks et al., 2019; Kompalli et al., 2020b). Interestingly, the EIO region showed the largest variability with a non-negligible contribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) from smaller BC cores (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Over the NIO-W, the MMD values remained between 0.18–0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggesting advection of BC originating from mixed sources over peninsular India and/or the west coast. It may be noted that the exact sources cannot be identified from the MMD value of rBC size distributions alone. More details on source apportionment are provided in Sect. 3.3.</p>
      <p id="d1e2485">The spatial distribution of NMD also showed a similar picture to that of MMD over all the regions. We compared the MMD values of rBC observed in our campaign with the values reported from selected locations with distinct dominant sources in different environments in Table 2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2491">A comparison of rBC average mass median diameters/mode of mass size distributions (MSD) reported from selected locations with distinct sources in different environments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.98}[.98]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S. no.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Type of location/sources</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MSD mode/MMD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5">Aged air masses in remote/outflow regions </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">South-eastern Arabian Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Continental outflow/mixed sources</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18–0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Present study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Northern Indian Ocean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Continental outflow/mixed sources</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.19–0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Present study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Equatorial Indian Ocean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Outflow impacted remote</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18–0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Present study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">marine/mixed sources</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fukue Island, Japan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Asian outflow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.20–0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Shiraiwa et al. (2008)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Suzu, Japan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Urban/east Asian outflow site</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Ueda et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mukteshwar, the Himalayas,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High-altitude/biofuel,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Raatikainen et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">India</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">crop residue outflow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jungfraujoch, Switzerland</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High-altitude remote</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.22–0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Liu et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">background/biomass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">burning, aged BC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Finnish Arctic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Remote background/aged air mass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.15–0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Raatikainen et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Alert, Nunavut, Canada</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Remote background/aged air mass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.16–0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Sharma et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(within the Arctic Circle)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Catalina Island (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Aged air masses</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.153–0.170</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Ko et al. (2020)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">south-west of Los Angeles)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Atlantic Ocean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">European continental outflow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.199</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">McMeeking et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Zeppelin, European Arctic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Remote background/aged air mass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Zanatta et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5">Urban locations </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Regional average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Near source to high altitudes</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.17–0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">McMeeking et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">over Europe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(a) European continental</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(a) 0.18–0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(b) Urban outflow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(b) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">14.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bhubaneswar, India</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Urban/fresh urban emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Kompalli et al. (2020b)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Urban/continental outflow, aged BC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18–0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Urban/with high solid-fuel emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Indo-Gangetic Plain</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Urban polluted/mixed   sources</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18–0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Brooks et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(aircraft experiment)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">16.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gual Pahari, India</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Urban polluted/fresh biofuel,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Raatikainen et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">crop residue</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">17.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shanghai, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Urban/pollution episode with</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Gong et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">high biomass burning</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">18.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">London, England</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Urban/traffic emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.119–0.124</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Liu et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wood burning</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.170</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">19.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Canadian oil sand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Urban/fresh urban emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.135–0.145</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Cheng et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mining, Canada</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Catalina Island (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Biomass burning</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.149–0.171</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Ko et al. (2020)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">south-west of Los Angeles)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fossil fuel emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.112–0.129</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page9182?><p id="d1e3288">As evident from Table 2, the MMD values during ICARB-2018 mostly fall in the category of BC from the continental outflow and originated from mixed sources (McMeeking et al., 2010, 2011; Ueda et al., 2016; Cheng et al., 2018). Recently, Kompalli et al. (2020b)  also reported mean MMD values of 0.18–0.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over Bhubaneswar (located on the east coast of India) during the winter when urban continental outflow with mixed sources from the Indo-Gangetic Plain prevailed. Similarly, Liu et al. (2019) have reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the urban environment of Beijing with mixed sources. The mean MMD values (Table 2) and mass size distributions over different regions covered in this study (Fig. S2 in the Supplement) revealed that although the peak amplitudes varied in proportion to the magnitude of the BC loading, which decreased with increasing distance from the peninsula, the modal diameters (0.19–0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) showed little variability, which is also underlined by similar geometric standard deviation values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.59. This is also consistent with the widespread nature of the continental outflow to the northern Indian Ocean (from west to east) and mixed sources for rBC particles in the outflow (McMeeking et al., 2010).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Spatial variation of the BC aerosol mixing state</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>The bulk coating parameters: RCT and ACT</title>
      <p id="d1e3358">The variation of bulk relative coating thickness (RCT) estimated using Eq. (1) and absolute coating thickness (ACT) describes the physicochemical changes in the characteristics of rBC taking place during atmospheric chemical ageing from the outflow to the oceanic regions. The spatial variation of these parameters during the cruise is shown in the top panels of Fig. 4, while the bottom panels show the frequency of occurrence of these parameters over the different oceanic regions. Corresponding median values are also written in the figures.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3363">Spatial variation of the bulk <bold>(a)</bold> relative coating thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(b)</bold> absolute coating thickness ((<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (the colour scale indicates the magnitude), and <bold>(c, d)</bold> frequency of occurrence of the bulk RCT and ACT in different oceanic sub-regions (shaded following the criteria in Fig. 1). Sub-regional median values are written in the bottom panels.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/9173/2021/acp-21-9173-2021-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3423">The median values show a clear spatial variation of the coating thicknesses (both RCT and ACT), being highest over the SEAS (closest to the coast) and lowest over the EIO (farthest from the landmass). This is attributed to the steadily<?pagebreak page9183?> decreasing concentrations of the coating material in the outflow due to possible dispersion and reactions. The SEAS region, which is in proximity to the coast and immediately impacted by the outflow, displayed a wide range of coating values (Fig. 4c and d), with the highest overall median values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RCT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">109</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm). Notably, two peaks of comparable magnitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RCT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2.3; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 126 nm) are visible in the frequency distribution over this region (Fig. 4d), highlighting the large variability due to varied amounts of condensable species and rBC chemical ageing. Nearly 95 % of the observational points over the SEAS region indicated that rBC particles have an additional coating over their cores to the extent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of their size. Such high levels of the coating indicate the availability of high concentrations of condensable materials in the outflow, as have also been reported by other investigators  (e.g., Gong et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2019; Brooks et al., 2019). Over the NIO-E region, only thickly coated BC particles are observed where the frequency distributions show a narrow and sharp peak for bulk RCT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>median</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and ACT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>median</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">104</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm). This highlighted the contrasting nature of the condensable coating material in the Bay of Bengal and/or the east coast outflow channel compared to the west coast and/or peninsular India outflow channel. Earlier, Moorthy et al. (2005) showed that the east coast and/or coastal Bay of Bengal has stronger hotspots of surface aerosols and gases, as well as a higher abundance of submicron aerosols. Such variability in the species concentrations in the outflow channels is responsible for the marked contrast in the coating parameters examined here.</p>
      <p id="d1e3510">As we move farther to the EIO region, RCT and ACT decreased conspicuously, with median values of 1.73 and 69 nm, respectively, with frequency distributions skewed towards lower values. It may be recollected that the lowest BC loading was also noticed over this region (Fig. 2), which experienced air masses that have spent considerable time in the marine atmosphere. The lower coating thickness here is attributed to dilution of the outflow and preferential scavenging processes during the advection restricting the concentrations of both the BC particles and condensable material. With atmospheric and/or chemical ageing, BC particles become increasingly internally mixed with condensable soluble material, which enhances their removal probability by dry deposition and in-cloud scavenging processes in the atmosphere, including both nucleation scavenging and scavenging by the pre-existing cloud droplets (Miyakawa et al., 2017; Ueda et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2008). While the larger BC particles are scavenged rather quickly, the smaller and relatively less-coated BC particles (occasionally, even bare soot particles) can persist in the outflow and be transported to the remote marine regions (Ueda et al., 2018). As the particles spend more time in the atmosphere, they tend to gain coating material on them. Simultaneously, the loss of coating material on the particles cannot be ruled out due to photolysis<?pagebreak page9184?> or heterogeneous oxidation that can bring about fragmentation, leading to thinner coatings. Thus, preferential scavenging of larger particles leaving behind smaller and more thinly coated particles and atmospheric processes leading to loss of condensable material explains the broad range of MMD (Fig. 3d) and lower RCT values observed over the EIO. Furthermore, in cleaner maritime regions like the equatorial Indian Ocean, the chemical ageing of BC occurs slowly due to reduced availability of coating material that possibly resulted in the observed smaller coatings on rBC over the EIO region. As the impact of continental outflow increases in the NIO-W, the coating on rBC increased once again (median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RCT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm). Interestingly, highly coated BC particles were found less frequently over the NIO-W (with west coast air masses) compared to its eastern counterpart, the NIO-E region, which experienced east coast and/or Bay of Bengal air masses originating from more industrialized upwind locations, e.g., Moorthy et al. (2005), Kompalli et al. (2013). Thus, a clear contrast in the mixing state parameters is evident, which is due to differences in respective coastal sources (Moorthy et al., 2008; Peng et al., 2016; Gong et al., 2016) and possible transit times over these two regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e3537">It is known that the BC mixing state depends on various factors, which include the BC size distribution, nature of sources, the concentration of condensable materials that BC encounters during its atmospheric lifetime, and processes such as photochemical ageing (Liu et al., 2013; Ueda et al., 2016; Miyakawa et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018, 2019). The values of BC coating parameters (bulk RCT and ACT) seen in the present study that examined outflow characteristics are comparable to the values reported in pollution in-plume air mass regions elsewhere (e.g., Cheng et al., 2018; Brooks et al.,  2019). Recently, Kompalli et al. (2020b)  reported seasonal mean bulk relative coating thickness (RCT) in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.8 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–70 nm over Bhubaneswar when the site received polluted outflow from the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP). Brooks et al. (2019) noticed thickly coated BC particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–200 nm) across northern India, especially the IGP and north-east India, during their recent aircraft experiments. As Cheng et al. (2018) and Ko et al. (2020) have highlighted, coating parameters derived from the SP2 instruments having different system configurations (detection limits of scattering intensity and range of volume equivalent diameters covered) and different techniques used in the estimation of the optical diameters from scattering amplitudes (Metcalf et al., 2012; Gong et al., 2016; Raatikainen et al., 2017; Cheng et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019; Ko et al., 2020) can vary considerably. This caveat needs to be borne in mind when making inter-study comparisons. Also, the earlier studies are mostly made in the “near-field” situation, whereas the present study examined the coating characteristics in a “far-field” scenario (far away from potential sources, especially the NIO and EIO regions). The caveat here is that the present study is not a Lagrangian experiment, and it is possible that the far-field measurements are influenced by mixing with the surrounding environment. Nevertheless, such a high degree of coatings on BC considerably enhances its absorption cross section, which thereby causes substantial absorption enhancement (by the factors in the range of 1.6–3.4) and affects the radiative forcing (Moffet and Prather, 2009; Shiraiwa et al., 2010; Thamban et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2018). The implication of the observed thick coatings on BC to regional radiative forcing needs further detailed investigation in future studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Coated BC diameter, $F_{\text{BC}}$, and bulk mixing ratio ($M_{{\mathrm{R},\text{bulk}}}$)}?><title>Coated BC diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and bulk mixing ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d1e3610">The spatial variation of number concentration (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of non-BC (i.e., purely scattering) particles detected by the SP2 and the fraction of rBC-containing particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; the ratio of rBC number concentration to the total number concentration in size range of 10–1000 nm from the SMPS and APS measurements) are shown in Fig. 5a and b. The bottom panels of the same figure show the volume-weighted coated BC size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 5c) and bulk mixing ratio of coating mass to rBC mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 5d) calculated using the Eqs. (3) and (4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3682">Spatial variation of the <bold>(a)</bold> scattering (non-BC) particle number concentration (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(b)</bold> fraction of rBC-containing particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(c)</bold> volume-weighted coated BC size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <bold>(d)</bold> bulk mixing ratio of coating mass to rBC mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Rectangles with dashed borders highlight different sub-regions.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/9173/2021/acp-21-9173-2021-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3771">The overall spatial variation patterns of scattering particle concentrations and various mixing state parameters are similar to those of the rBC mass and number concentrations seen earlier, with the highest values over the SEAS, decreasing gradually towards the NIO (east and west) to reach the lowest values over the remote EIO. The figure reveals the following:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label>
      <p id="d1e3776">The non-BC (scattering) particle concentrations were higher, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in the coastal waters (the SEAS), decreasing towards farther oceanic regions and reached values as low as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the remote EIO, which is in line with the expected reduction in the influence of the sources (Fig. 5a).</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label>
      <p id="d1e3828">The rBC particles constituted about 8 %–12 % of the total particle number concentration over different sub-regions, on average (Fig. 5b). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values showed the largest variability over the SEAS among all the regions (Fig. 5b).</p></list-item><list-item><label>iii.</label>
      <p id="d1e3843">Coated rBC particles were larger (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over coastal waters (SEAS), highlighting a substantial enhancement of the overall rBC particle sizes due to thick coatings on them in the polluted outflow air masses. The values diminished farther away, and the lowest values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are seen over the EIO region (Fig. 5c).</p></list-item><list-item><label>iv.</label>
      <?pagebreak page9185?><p id="d1e3897">The bulk mixing ratio of coating mass over rBC mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) revealed high values (2.5–15) with large variability over the regions with extensive outflow (SEAS) due to the presence of thickly coated BC particles in these regions. Though <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were very low over the EIO, occasional higher values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are also seen (Fig. 5d).</p></list-item></list>
Interestingly, concentrations of scattering (non-BC) particles (Fig. 5a) over the SEAS (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">973</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the NIO-E (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">747</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are comparable to or higher than the values reported over the IGP outflow site, Bhubaneswar (winter mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">950</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">464</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">702</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">458</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as reported by Kompalli et al. (2020b). This highlighted the strength of the outflow to the oceanic regions. Any increase in non-BC particle abundance impacts the fraction of rBC-containing particles. The mean fraction of rBC-containing particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) that were in the range of 0.08–0.12 over different sub-regions occasionally decreased to very low values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 0.04, owing to a large influx of ultrafine particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sizes</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) during the new particle formation events that occurred due to substantial amounts of condensable vapours (Kompalli et al., 2020a). The highest fraction of rBC-containing particles was seen over the NIO-W (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) region, whereas the largest range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (0.03–0.21) among all the regions were observed over the SEAS. The present mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values seen over the northern and equatorial Indian Ocean are lower than those reported over the Finnish Arctic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the 350 to 450 nm size range), a background site receiving aged air masses (Raatikainen et al., 2015). However, earlier studies over the continental landmass of India have shown much higher number fractions with mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over two stations, Gual Pahari (polluted site) and Mukteshwar (regional background site), in northern India (Raatikainen et al., 2017). This was attributed to the strong influence of regional anthropogenic activities on BC loading. In the present study, rBC particles constituted about 25 % to 30 % of the measured scattering particles over almost the entire oceanic region north of 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, whereas they occasionally decreased to 15 % to 20 % over the far oceanic regions. Kompalli et al. (2020b)  reported widely varied mean fractions (25 %–69 % of the measured scattering particles in different seasons) over Bhubaneswar (eastern India) with the same instrument. They attributed it to the seasonal variation of the scattering (non-BC) particle population. Sharma et al. (2017) have reported 10 %–16 % of particles containing rBC cores in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–400 nm optical diameter over Alert in the Canadian Arctic. The presence of lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values over the marine regions in this study, which received a strong continental outflow, is not surprising, considering the observed large number concentration of total particles (Kompalli et al., 2020a) and the non-BC scattering particles in the detection range of the SP2 (200–400 nm) (along with rBC particles).</p>
      <p id="d1e4203">Strong continental outflows (from the polluted regions) are more likely to contain significant amounts of condensable material that can act as a potential coating on rBC (Liu et al., 2014, 2019; Raatikainen et al., 2017). This is reflected in the observed high values of coated BC particle diameters (0.36–0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in this study (Fig. 5c). The present <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values over the northern Indian Ocean region are higher than those recently reported by Brooks et al. (2019) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the IGP and eastern India, but comparable to the values reported by Raatikainen et al. (2017) for thickly coated BC particles in polluted outflow environments in northern India.</p>
      <p id="d1e4252">The higher bulk mixing ratio of coating mass over rBC mass values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–15) (Fig. 5d) is seen over the adjacent marine regions and due to the presence of thickly coated BC particles. Though lower compared to other sub-regions, substantial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values were found even over the EIO region. Such high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were reported in the literature from extremely polluted environments and biomass burning source dominant regions (Liu et al., 2017, 2019). The presence of such non-absorbing coated mass on the rBC cores has significant radiative implications. Recently, Liu et al. (2017)  examined the measured and modelled optical properties of BC as a function of mass ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under different environments and found that significant absorption enhancement occurs when the coating mass over rBC mass is larger than 3. They suggested that in such a scenario (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the core–shell model reproduces the measured scattering cross section.</p>
      <p id="d1e4358">A summary of rBC physical properties and mixing state parameters in different oceanic regions are presented in Table 3.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4364">A summary of regional mean values of rBC physical properties and mixing state parameters during the ICARB-2018. The values after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> are standard deviations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SEAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NIO-E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">EIO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NIO-W</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">rBC mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">938</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">293</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">546</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">114</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">614</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">211</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">rBC number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">378</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">191</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">227</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scattering particle concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">973</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">747</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">262</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">140</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">580</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">156</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mass median diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number median diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.107</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relative coating thickness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.93</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Absolute coating thickness (nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">109</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">104</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fraction of rBC-containing particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Volume-weighted coated BC size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bulk mixing ratio of coating mass over rBC mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.91</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e5113">Table 3 highlights the spatial heterogeneity in rBC microphysical properties over the northern Indian ocean. It reveals the contrast in outflow strength with varied extents of BC and non-BC species abundance on the west coast/peninsular India and the east coast and/or Bay of Bengal air masses. Table 3 also highlights the diminishing strength of the outflow as seen from the lower concentrations, coatings, and associated mixing state parameters over the EIO region.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page9186?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>BC segregation by size-resolved mixing state</title>
      <p id="d1e5125">The above discussions have established that
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label>
      <p id="d1e5130">The extent of the coating as measured by the coating thickness and the bulk mixing ratio of coating mass over rBC mass, and hence the mixing of BC with condensable species, is highest closer to the coast where the outflow is strong and decreases in the farther oceanic regions.</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label>
      <p id="d1e5134">The rBC core diameters, as well as the fractional concentration of rBC to total concentration, remained more or less comparable throughout the oceanic regions surveyed, suggesting an impact of similar sources of mixed origin. However, the coated BC diameters varied according to the magnitude of coating over different regions.</p></list-item></list>
To examine these common sources, the size-resolved BC mixing state is examined from the variation in scattering enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Eq. 5) as a function of BC core diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Fig. 6. The corresponding bulk absolute coating thickness (ACT) values are mapped to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (solid white lines) in the figure. The data collected from 16:41:24 on 21 January 2018 to 18:02:46 on 22 January 2018 (Indian standard time) were used to construct the figure (which falls in the transition period between the SEAS and NIO-E regions). The same analysis repeated for a few other data sets over the other regions also yielded similar results. Following the methodology described in  previous publications (Liu et al., 2014, 2019; Brooks et al., 2019), the BC particles are segregated according to the discontinuous distribution in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dashed black lines in the figure). Four classes of BC particles are described: (a) small BC with a thin coating, i.e., with BC core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>diameters</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm; (b) moderately coated BC, with ACT in the range of 50–200 nm; (c) thickly coated BC with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm; and (d) large uncoated BC, with BC core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>size</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and coating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>thicknesses</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm. In the present study, there is no noteworthy presence of a clear smaller sized BC with a thin coating, which is generally attributed to fresh traffic emissions (e.g., Liu et al., 2014, over London; Liu et al., 2019, over Beijing). Brooks et al. (2019) also found smaller contributions from such particles during aircraft observations over the north-west and north-east parts of India carried out in the dry season.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5277">Scattering enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of BC core size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the typical outflow air masses during the ICARB-2018. The plot is coloured by particle number concentration. The solid brown line, with the corresponding scale on the right axis, shows the number fraction of BC particles that were successfully determined according to their scattering signal at each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> size. The image plot is a two-dimensional histogram for the detected particles. The particles are separated as four groups using the borders (from top to bottom) at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.000436</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown by dashed black lines on the figure (Liu et al., 2019). The solid white lines show the absolute coating thickness (ACT, nm) mapped on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/9173/2021/acp-21-9173-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5392">The main features in the figure are
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>a.</label>
      <p id="d1e5397">A reasonable amount of moderately coated BC particles having ACT of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–100 nm with scattering enhancements in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–10 were seen, and  a significant proportion of moderately coated BC particles with large scattering enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–100), which increased with BC core sizes during the ICARB cruise. This highlighted the substantial contribution from a combination of mixed sources that co-emit BC and condensable material (Liu et al., 2014, 2019).</p></list-item><list-item><label>b.</label>
      <p id="d1e5441">Even smaller-sized BC cores (which possibly originate from fossil fuel emissions and transform to larger cores during the atmospheric transit) were significantly coated with resultant scattering <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>enhancement</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the ICARB-2018, which highlights the extent of chemical ageing of BC particles in the continental outflow. Such faster chemical ageing of smaller cores is possible in the polluted air masses (Gong et al., 2016). Similarly, faster chemical ageing of large BC particles that generally originate from biomass burning sources results in moderate to thicker coating (Schwarz et al., 2008; Gong et al., 2016) and amplified scattering enhancement (Liu et al., 2019), which is also seen from<?pagebreak page9187?> Fig. 6.</p></list-item><list-item><label>c.</label>
      <p id="d1e5457">Remarkably, a greater proportion of thickly coated particles with varied BC core diameters and a wide range (5–800) of scattering enhancement values were also observed, further highlighting a strong mixed source influence of the continental outflow.</p></list-item></list>
Besides the normal mode similar to the one (with core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>diameter</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and coating thickness of 50–200 nm) reported from the aircraft measurements of BC mixing state over the Indian continent by Brooks et al. (2019), an additional mode of BC with BC core sizes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">110</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–130 nm and a significant coating thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) is seen during this study. Such a mode highlights the influence of long-range transport to the ocean from the continent on BC chemical ageing. Though the BC mass loading decreases during the long-range transport, the remaining BC cores gain a greater coating over the ocean than over land (e.g., Moteki et al., 2007). Further, it indicates a strong secondary production of aerosol components during the transport over the ocean, contributing to the BC chemical ageing. The much thicker coatings seen during the ICARB-2018 compared to the observations from the ground-based site (Kompalli et al., 2020b) and the aircraft measurements (Brooks et al., 2019) over the Indian region are also indicative of other sources (with poor combustion efficiencies such as biomass burning) being prevalent in this region. Gong et al. (2016) have reported thick ACT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">110</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–300 nm) values during a biomass burning pollution episode in urban Shanghai, comparable to the present BC mode. These values are higher than the values reported from the aircraft measurements over biomass burning plumes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm; Ditas et al., 2018), the south-east Atlantic Ocean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm in the boundary layer and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm in the free troposphere; Taylor et al., 2020), and aged smoke in Amazonia (55–90 nm) (Darbyshire et al., 2019). Therefore, the measurement over the ocean thus offers an opportunity to study a more chemically aged BC from the continent outflow.</p>
      <p id="d1e5545">The high proportion of thick coatings on BC particles may result in significant increases in absorption by the BC. As reported by Brooks et al. (2019) from measurements over the IGP, a significant fraction of moderately coated BC particles with increased scattering enhancement were found to have higher mass absorption coefficient values over the Indo-Gangetic Plain. They attributed this to vigorous mixing between various sources due to the high amounts of secondary aerosol formation and photochemical ageing across northern India. The present scenario, with a steady pollutant outflow containing contributions from diverse sources, is akin to it. Such alterations to the mixing state of BC can contribute to significant enhancement in the absorbing characteristics of BC aerosols over the marine regions as they underdo chemical ageing while transiting from upwind source regions on the west and east coasts of India, which may have noteworthy regional climate implications.</p>
      <p id="d1e5548">The large uncoated rBC particles (core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>diameters</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thin coatings of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) with low scattering enhancements were also found during our measurements but in smaller quantities, consistent with the findings of Brooks et al. (2019) for the Indian region during the pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons. Liu et al. (2019) described that large uncoated rBC particles are indicative of coal-burning emissions and suggested that larger core BC particles with no or thin coatings display minimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. This can be due to significant bias introduced by the sphericity assumption used in the Mie calculations and a possible difference in the refractive index of BC produced from coal-burning from the value assumed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Mie calculations used to derive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, this aspect cannot be addressed in the present study in the absence of measurements of BC morphology or source-dependent refractive index of rBC. As such, a more detailed in situ analysis is necessary to address this.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page9188?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Association between BC coating thickness and NR-$\text{PM}_{{1.0}}$ chemical species}?><title>Association between BC coating thickness and NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical species</title>
      <p id="d1e5644">Information on the nature of the coating material along with the state of mixing of BC particles gives insight into the magnitude of the mixing-induced absorption enhancement for BC (Cappa et al., 2012, 2018; Peng et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017). We have used the concurrent measurements of non-refractory <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) aerosol mass and chemical composition data from the ACSM to infer the nature of the coating material during the ICARB-2018. Though it may be possible for BC to be mixed externally with coarse mode aerosols like dust or sea-salt aerosols in the real atmosphere, Fig. 6 directly dispels the importance of this notion.</p>
      <p id="d1e5669">General features of NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical composition are shown in Fig. 7, which shows the sub-regional mean mass concentrations and mass fractions (MF) of different species over the oceanic regions covered during the cruise.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e5685"><bold>(a)</bold> Mass concentration and <bold>(b)</bold> mass fraction of NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical species, organics, sulfate, ammonium, nitrate, and chloride over different sub-regions during the ICARB-2018.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/9173/2021/acp-21-9173-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5711">In line with the pattern for rBC, the overall NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol mass concentration was also highest over the SEAS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), decreasing steadily further away from the continent to reach the lowest concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the EIO, where mostly oceanic air masses prevailed. Sulfate and organics were the two major species dominating the NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition. Of these two, sulfate dominated most of the oceanic sub-regions with a mass fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> except for the SEAS region, where organics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were also equally important. The mass fraction of ammonium, which is formed through gas-phase and aqueous-phase chemical reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced from animal wastes, fertilizers, ocean, and soil, was in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.23, while nitrate (0.01–0.02) and chloride are negligible in all the regions. To summarize, the South Asian outflow plumes consist of more or less equal proportions of organics and sulfate aerosols in the vicinity of the west coast and/or peninsular India, gradually changing to a sulfate-rich aerosol system in the remote oceanic regions. This marked change from the prominent presence of organics plus sulfate over coastal regions to a strong sulfate dominance over the remote oceanic regions emphasized the atmospheric processes (formation, transformation, and removal) that are at play in determining the life cycle of these species during their transport. Possible oxidation of primary particulate organic matter due to heterogeneous reactions involving oxidants such as OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during long-range transport can result in their volatilization, thus restricting their lifetime (Molina et al., 2004; Donahue et al., 2006; DeCarlo et al., 2010). However, enhanced sulfate production is possible through the gas to particle conversion in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich air masses (especially when ambient relative humidity is higher) (Unger et al., 2006; Meng et al., 2016) that originate over the<?pagebreak page9189?> Indian region or through the dimethyl sulfide (DMS) pathway from the marine emissions (Zorn et al., 2008; Shank et al., 2012). During long-range transport, in situ oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by OH radicals in the gas phase followed by condensation onto pre-existing particles or reaction of S(IV) via <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the aqueous phase can lead to enhanced sulfate concentrations. All such processes could have contributed to observed spatial heterogeneity in the observed organics to sulfate concentrations. Detailed investigation of these processes is not within the scope of the present study.</p>
      <p id="d1e5918">Further, the association between ammonium and sulfate (Fig. S3 in the Supplement) indicated an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficit environment (Aswini et al., 2020). In Fig. S4  in the Supplement, the ratio (expressed as %) of non-refractory coating mass on BC to the total NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations (from the ACSM) are shown. The mean ratios (varying between 23 %–35 %) for different sub-regions are also mentioned in the figure.</p>
      <p id="d1e5945">We examined the association between bulk absolute coating thickness (inferences did not change even if we use RCT) and mass concentrations of NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> organic aerosols, sulfate, and ammonium during the campaign (Fig. 8) when ACT is low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of MMD) (Fig. 8a–c) and high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of MMD) (Fig. 8d–f). The colour bar indicates the values of the corresponding MMDs. The solid line is the linear least squares fit between the variables and the corresponding correlation coefficient (Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is also shown in the figure.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e5992">Scatter plot between the mass concentrations of non-refractory <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> organics, sulfate, and ammonium aerosols and bulk absolute coating thickness during the ICARB-2018 for the observations with low ACT <bold>(a–c)</bold> and high ACT <bold>(d–f)</bold>. Colour represents the corresponding mass median diameter value. Solid lines represent the linear least squares fit to the points. Regression slopes and correlation coefficients are written in each panel.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/9173/2021/acp-21-9173-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6018">Regression analysis suggested two distinct regression lines in the sulfate and ammonium plots. The bulk ACT showed a reasonable association (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate and ammonium and a weaker association with organics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of MMD) observations. Corresponding slopes indicated that ACT on BC intensified more steeply with an enhanced mass concentration of sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>slope</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to organics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>slope</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas the steepest enhancement in the ACT was noticed for ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>slope</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In contrast, there is no significant association between bulk ACT and mass concentrations of NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species during high ACT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of MMD) observations. In this case, higher ACT values prevailed for all values of sulfate (or organics) and ammonium. The low and high ACT groups of observations are distinctly separated by the corresponding MMD values, where more frequent higher MMD values were seen for the BC population having a higher coating.</p>
      <p id="d1e6153">Thus, Fig. 8 suggested the possibility of complex coating on BC in the proximity of continental outflow where higher ACT (also higher MMD), significant amounts of organics, and ammonium were observed. In the far oceanic regions, sulfate components can act as a relatively dominant coating material on BC (compared to organics). This is not unexpected considering the chemically aged BC particles that were present in the remote marine boundary layer dominated by the sulfate aerosol system. Previously, Ueda et al. (2018) reported morphological features of soot-containing particles over the Southern Ocean and suggested that aged soot-containing particles were transformed by soluble materials derived from dimethyl sulfide (DMS) oxidation during the summer. Though this DMS oxidation pathway may not be strong for in situ production during the winter, it may be important when the reactions during entrainment of free tropospheric air masses into remote marine atmospheric boundary layer are considered (e.g., Clarke and Kapustin, 2002). Zhang et al. (2008) suggested that soot particles acquire a large mass fraction of sulfuric acid during atmospheric ageing. It is well known that semivolatile organic compounds are lost during atmospheric ageing due to evaporation following the dilution and oxidation of primary organics due to heterogeneous reactions (Donahue et al., 2006; Lambe et al., 2013). Such chemical ageing (the degree of oxygenation) of organics has previously been identified by increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are the ratios between the mass-to-charge ratios at 44 and 43 and the total organics signal in the component mass spectrum, respectively (Ng et al., 2011). During this cruise, gradual increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed with distance from the coast.  However, as described earlier, sulfate concentrations can increase due to the heterogeneous in situ oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and condensation of sulfuric acid onto pre-existing particles after gas-phase oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during long-range transport (Kompalli et al., 2020b, and references therein). These processes can contribute to the alteration of the mixing state of BC, which is a relatively longer-lived species, and determine its dominant coating material. Another interesting possibility is organosulfates acting as a coating material on BC, but examining it is beyond the scope of the present study.</p>
      <p id="d1e6223">The MMD values of rBC showed no particular pattern with changing NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species mass concentrations. Further, the rBC mass concentrations showed a good association with organics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (not shown), corroborating the presence of multiple sources that co-emit particulate organics and sulfate along with BC aerosols. As described earlier, the mean fraction of rBC-containing particles remained similar (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) over different regions (SEAS, NIO-E, and EIO). However, frequent new particle formation events (Kompalli et al., 2020a)  resulted in lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), which is reflected in the amounts of NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass that are bound to rBC particles. It was observed that new particle formation and subsequent growth to larger sizes preceded an enhancement in the mass concentrations of submicron aerosols (mostly organics and occasionally sulfate). This suggests another possibility of a reduction in the primary particulate pollution, and the available secondary condensate promotes nucleation in such cases. Also, the portion of the non-refractory submicron aerosol mass bound to the BC particles varied over a wide range of 10 %–40 % over different regions (Fig. S4 in the Supplement) and lower values were especially seen during new particle formation (NPF) periods (not shown here). Figure S5  in the Supplement shows<?pagebreak page9190?> the association between the sum of mass concentrations of organics, sulfate, and ammonium aerosols and bulk absolute coating thickness over different sub-regions covered during the ICARB-2018. This reveals a very good association (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the remote EIO and a weak association over the NIO-E regions, whereas no association was found over the SEAS and NIO-W regions. It also advocates that variation in the submicron aerosol composition can explain alterations to rBC mixing state over the remote regions, whereas the rBC mixing state would be complex in the vicinity of the source regions. All these suggested the presence of distinct sources and atmospheric processes involving a range of condensing gaseous species contributing to the BC coating, altering its mixing state by enhancing the extent of the coating. However, it is not possible to precisely demarcate the sources and coating substances at the individual particle level with the present methodology using the SP2 and ACSM in tandem. It can be achieved through an instrument like a soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SP-AMS) (e.g., Gong et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2018). Alternatively, in situ morphological analysis techniques (like transmission electron microscope (TEM) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray analyser) (Adachi et al., 2010, 2014; Ueda et al., 2016, 2018) are needed for the identification of particle-level morphology.</p>
      <p id="d1e6316">The present study focused on the characterization of refractory BC microphysical properties, including its mixing state information over the south-eastern Arabian Sea and the northern and equatorial Indian Ocean regions, which were influenced by distinct outflow air masses (that originated over the east coast and/or Bay of Bengal, the west coast/peninsular India and marine regions and traversed over the oceanic regions). The sensitivity of the optical, hygroscopic properties of BC to these observed characteristics and the estimation of regional radiative and climatic implications due to such highly chemically aged, thickly coated large BC particles form the scope of future study.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e6328">In the present study, the first-ever measurements of refractory BC microphysical properties (mass/number size distributions and mixing state parameters) over the oceanic regions adjacent to the Indian continent during periods of outflow were carried out as part of ICARB-2018. The major findings are the following:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6333">The rBC mass concentrations were highest over the coastal region of the south-eastern Arabian Sea (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">938</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">293</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which received continental outflow directly from the western coast and/or peninsular India and dropped to the lowest concentrations over the remote EIO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">114</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where the impact of outflow was very weak. Nevertheless, the significant concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) observed over the NIO region, distant from the sources, highlighted the transport efficiency of the rBC and the widespread nature of the continental outflow.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6429">BC size distributions indicated a combination of sources and the BC core sizes corresponding to aged (temporally and/or chemically) continental outflow. Despite widely varied magnitudes of the rBC mass loading, the mass median diameter (MMD) values were in a narrow range of 0.18–0.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in all the regions due to the persistent outflow.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6443">Importantly, the continental outflow from the Indian region to the adjacent oceans is characterized by thickly coated BC particles, which may have significant regional climatic implications. A great degree of coating on rBC particles and large variability of mixing state parameters was found over the SEAS region (median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RCT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">109</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) that is greatly impacted by short-range continental outflow. The coating parameters showed a clear east–west contrast over the northern Indian Ocean with higher coatings and a narrow distribution over the NIO-E region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RCT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">104</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) where the east coast and/or the Bay of Bengal air masses prevailed, compared to the NIO-W (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RCT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) that received the west coast and/or peninsular India air masses. Observed lower coatings on rBC over the remote EIO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RCT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) suggested the possible role of preferential scavenging processes removing both internally mixed, large, thickly coated BC particles and potential condensable soluble material.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6544">The average fraction of rBC-containing particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was in the range of 0.08–0.12 over different regions, which highlighted the presence of significant non-BC particles, especially over the coastal regions. Despite similar rBC core diameters (and the fraction of rBC-containing particles) due to like sources, coated BC diameters varied according to the magnitude of the coating. The highest volume-weighted coated BC size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values were seen over the SEAS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the NIO-E (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), reflecting the vast extent of coating on BC in the air masses impacted by pollution outflow, compared to the EIO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which largely received marine air masses. Further, high values (2.5–15) of the bulk mixing ratio of coating mass to rBC mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were noticed in the outflow regions due to the presence of such thickly coated BC particles. Substantial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values were found even over the EIO region, which may be associated with both emissions and atmospheric processes like chemical ageing contributing to non-refractory coatings on rBC particles.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6696">Examination of the size-resolved BC mixing state revealed, unlike the studies reported over urban regions, the absence of any notable small BC with a thin coating (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) typically associated with traffic emissions. A significant proportion of moderately coated BC particles (with bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–100 nm) with two different ranges of scattering enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–10 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–100) were noticed due to the mixed nature of BC sources (a combination of solid fuel and fossil fuel emissions) in the outflow. Importantly, a higher proportion of thickly coated particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spanning over a wide range of 5–800 highlighted a distinct mixed source influence of the continental outflow from the Indian region to the surrounding oceanic regions.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6795">The non-refractory sub-micrometre aerosol chemical composition in the continental outflow is mostly dominated by sulfate, except for the coastal regions where organics were also found in significant quantities. The association between the non-refractory mass concentrations of particulate less than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in diameter (NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and bulk absolute coating thickness of rBC was weak for high ACT observations (seen in the proximity of sources), suggesting complex coatings. In contrast, for the BC population with low ACT values observed over the remote ocean where sulfate was the dominant NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species, a significant correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was found between sulfate and rBC coating.</p></list-item></list></p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page9192?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>Symbols and abbreviations</title>
      <p id="d1e6867"><table-wrap id="Taba" position="anchor"><oasis:table><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>Symbols/abbreviations</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>Meaning</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ACSM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aerosol chemical speciation monitor</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ACT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Absolute coating thickness</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BC core diameter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Volume-weighted coated BC size</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Scattering enhancement</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EIO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Equatorial Indian Ocean</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fraction of rBC-containing particles</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ICARB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Integrated Campaign for Aerosols, gases and Radiation Budget</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IGP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Indo-Gangetic Plain</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MMD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mass median diameter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bulk mixing ratio of coating mass over rBC mass</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NIO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Northern Indian Ocean</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NIO-E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Northern Indian Ocean (eastern leg)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NIO-W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Northern Indian Ocean (western leg)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NMD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number median diameter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Southern Arabian Sea</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SEAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">South-eastern Arabian Sea</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SP2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Single particle soot photometer</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">rBC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Refractory black carbon</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RCT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Relative coating thickness</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap></p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e7159">Data are available upon request from the contact author,  Surendran Nair Suresh Babu (sureshsplvssc@gmail.com).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e7162">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9173-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9173-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e7171">SNSB and SKK conceptualized the experiment and finalized the methodology. VSN, JV, SKK, MMG, and SNSB were involved in data collection onboard the ship. SKK carried out the scientific analysis of the data and was supported by MF and DL. SKK drafted the manuscript. SNSB, SKS, KKM, and HC reviewed and edited the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e7177">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e7183">This article is part of the special issue ”Interactions between aerosols and the South West Asian monsoon”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e7189">The ICARB-2018 experiment was carried out under the ISRO Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. Authors acknowledge the National Centre for Polar and Ocean Research (NCPOR) of the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India, for providing the shipboard facilities onboard ORV Sagar Kanya. We acknowledge the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory for the provision of the HYSPLIT transport and dispersion model and READY website (<uri>https://www.arl.noaa.gov/hysplit/ready/</uri>, last access: 20 September 2019) used in this study. We acknowledge the use of data and imagery from LANCE FIRMS operated by NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS) with funding provided by NASA Headquarters (<uri>http://earthdata.nasa.gov/firms</uri>, last access: 24 February 2020). Surendran Nair Suresh Babu acknowledges the Swarna Jayanti Fellowship from Department of Science Technology, Government of India for supporting the ACSM used in the study. TROPOMI retrieved tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gridded data were obtained from <uri>http://www.temis.nl/airpollution/no2col/no2regio_tropomi.php</uri> (last access: 27 February 2020) ERA-Interim wind data from ECMWF (European Centre for Medium range Weather Forecasting; <uri>https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/data/interim-full-daily/levtype=sfc/</uri>, last access: 25 February 2020) are acknowledged. Hugh Coe acknowledges support from NERC. Sreedharan Krishnakumari Satheesh would like to thank SERB-DST for the J.C. Bose Fellowship and “Tata Education and Development Trust” for the support.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e7217">Hugh Coe has been supported from NERC (grant no. NE/L013886/1).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e7223">This paper was edited by Andreas Petzold and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 4?><mixed-citation>Adachi, K., Chung, S. H., and Buseck, P. R.: Shapes of soot aerosol particles and implications for their effects on climate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D15206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012868</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 3?><mixed-citation>Adachi, K., Zaizen, Y., Kajino, M., and Igarashi, Y.: Mixing state of regionally transported soot particles and the coating effect on their size and shape at a mountain site in Japan, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 5386–5396, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020880</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Allan, J., Jimenez, J., Williams, P., Alfarra, M., Bower, K., Jayne, J., Coe, H., and Worsnop, D.: Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer: 1. Techniques of data interpretation and error analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD001607" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD001607</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 2?><mixed-citation>Allan, J., Delia, A. E., Coe, H., Bower, K. N., Alfrarra, R., Jimenez, J. L., Middlebrook, A. M., Drewnick, F., Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J., and Worsnop, D. R.: Technical note: a generalised method for the extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer data, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 909–922, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation> Asnani, G. C.: Tropical Meteorology, Vol.1 and Vol.2, Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pashan, Pune, 1012 pp., 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 6?><mixed-citation>Aswini A. R., Hegde P., Aryasree S., Girach I. A., and Nair P. R.: Continental outflow of anthropogenic aerosols over Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean during wintertime: ICARB-2018 campaign, Sci. Total Environ., 712, 135214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135214" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135214</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 9?><mixed-citation>Babu, S. S., Moorthy, K. K., Manchanda, R. K., Sinha, P. R., Satheesh, S. K., Vajja, D. P., Srinivasan, S., and Kumar, V. H. A.: Free tropospheric black carbon aerosol measurements using high altitude balloon: Do BC layers build their own homes up in the atmosphere?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L08803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL046654" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL046654</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 8?><mixed-citation>Babu, S. S., Gogoi, M. M., Kumar, V. H. A., Nair, V. S., and Moorthy, K. K.: Radiative properties of Bay of Bengal aerosols: Spatial distinctiveness and source impacts, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D06213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017355" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017355</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 7?><mixed-citation> Babu, S. S., Manoj, M. R., Moorthy, K. K., Gogoi, M. M., Nair, V. S., Kompalli, S. K., Satheesh, S. K., Niranjan, K., Ramagopal, K., Bhuyan, P. K., and Singh, D.: Trends in aerosol optical depth over Indian region: Potential causes and impact indicators, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 11794–11806, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 10?><mixed-citation>Bollasina, M., Nigam, S., and Lau, K.-M.: Absorbing Aerosols and Summer Monsoon Evolution over South Asia: An Observational Portrayal, J. Climate, 21, 3221–3239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI2094.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007JCLI2094.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 13?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light absorption by carbonaceous particles: An investigative review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 27–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500421521</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 12?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., De Angelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Karcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M., Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K., Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U., Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C. S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system:<?pagebreak page9194?> A scientific assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 11?><mixed-citation>Boos, W. R. and Storelvmo, T.: Near-linear response of mean monsoon strength to a broad range of radiative forcings, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 1510–1515, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517143113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1517143113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 14?><mixed-citation>Brooks, J., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Williams, P. I., Haywood, J., Highwood, E. J., Kompalli, S. K., Babu, S. S., Satheesh, S. K., Turner, A. G., and Coe, H.: Black carbon physical and optical properties across northern India during pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13079–13096, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13079-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-13079-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 15?><mixed-citation>Budisulistiorini, S. H., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E. S., Bairai, S. T., Mueller, S., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Seasonal characterization of submicron aerosol chemical composition and organic aerosol sources in the southeastern United States: Atlanta, Georgia,and Look Rock, Tennessee, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5171–5189, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5171-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5171-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 16?><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M., Jayne, J., Jimenez, J., Allan, J., Alfarra, M., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia, A., Williams, L., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., DeCarlo, P., Kolb, C., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D.: Chemical and microphysical characterisation of ambient aerosols with the Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/Mas.20115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/Mas.20115</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 17?><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Worsnop, D. R., Bates, T. S., Cross, E. S., Davidovits, P., Hakala, J., Hayden, K. L., Jobson, B. T., Kolesar, K. R., Lack, D. A., Lerner, B. M., Li, S.-M., Mellon, D., Nuaaman, I., Olfert, J. S., Petäjä, T., Quinn, P. K., Song, C., Subramanian, R., Williams, E. J., and Zaveri, R. A.: Radiative Absorption Enhancements Due to the Mixing State of Atmospheric Black Carbon, Science, 337, 1078–1081, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1223447</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 18?><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Zhang, X., Russell, L. M., Collier, S., Lee, A. K. Y., Chen, C.-L., Betha, R., Chen, S., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Sanchez, K. J., McMeeking, G. R., Williams, L. R., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Abbatt, J., and Zhang, Q.: Light absorption by ambient black and brown carbon and its dependence on black carbon coating state for two California, USA, cities in winter and summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1550–1577, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029501</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 20?><mixed-citation>Chen, C., Fan, X., Shaltout, T., Qiu, C., Ma, Y., Goldman, A., and Khalizov, A. F.: An unexpected restructuring of combustion soot aggregates by subnanometer coatings of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11080–11088, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070877" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL070877</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 19?><mixed-citation>Chen, C., Enekwizu, O. Y., Fan, X., Dobrzanski, C. D., Ivanova, E. V., Ma, Y., Gor, G. Y., and Khalizov, A. F.: Single parameter for predicting the morphology of atmospheric black carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 14169–14179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b04201</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 21?><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., Li, S.-M., Gordon, M., and Liu, P.: Size distribution and coating thickness of black carbon from the Canadian oil sands operations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2653–2667, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2653-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2653-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 22?><mixed-citation>Clarke, A. D. and Kapustin, V. N.: A Pacific aerosol survey: I. A decade of data on particle production, transport, evolution, and mixing in the troposphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 363–382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0363:APASPI&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0363:APASPI&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 23?><mixed-citation>Darbyshire, E., Morgan, W. T., Allan, J. D., Liu, D., Flynn, M. J., Dorsey, J. R., O'Shea, S. J., Lowe, D., Szpek, K., Marenco, F., Johnson, B. T., Bauguitte, S., Haywood, J. M., Brito, J. F., Artaxo, P., Longo, K. M., and Coe, H.: The vertical distribution of biomass burning pollution over tropical South America from aircraft in situ measurements during SAMBBA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5771–5790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5771-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-5771-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 24?><mixed-citation> Das, P. K.: The Monsoons, 5th IMO Lecture, WMO Rep. 613, World Meteorol. Org., Geneva, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 25?><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Ulbrich, I. M., Crounse, J., de Foy, B., Dunlea, E. J., Aiken, A. C., Knapp, D., Weinheimer, A. J., Campos, T., Wennberg, P. O., and Jimenez, J. L.: Investigation of the sources and processing of organic aerosol over the Central Mexican Plateau from aircraft measurements during MILAGRO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5257–5280, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 26?><mixed-citation>Ditas, J., Ma, N., Zhang, Y., Assmann, D., Neumaier, M., Riede, H., Karu, E., Williams, J., Scharffe, D., Wang, Q., Saturno, J., Schwarz, J. P., Katich, J. M., McMeeking, G. R., Zahn, A., Hermann, M., Brenninkmeijer, C. A., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., Su, H., and Cheng, Y.: Strong impact of wildfires on the abundance and aging of black carbon in the lowermost stratosphere, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, E11595–E11603, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806868115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1806868115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 27?><mixed-citation> Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation>D'Errico, M., Cagnazzo, C., Fogli, P. G., Lau, W. K. M., von Hardenberg, J., Fierli, F., and Cherchi, A.: Indian monsoon and the elevated-heat-pump mechanism in a coupled aerosol climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 8712–8723, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023346" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023346</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 29?><mixed-citation> Gao, R. S., Schwarz, J. P., Kelly, K. K., Fahey, D. W., Watts, L. A., Thompson, T. L., Spackman, J. R., Slowik, J. G., Cross, E. S., Han, J. H., Davidovits, P., Onasch, T. B., and Worsnop, D. R.: A novel method for estimating light-scattering properties of soot aerosols using a modified single-particle soot photometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 125–135, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 30?><mixed-citation>Gogoi, M. M., Rao C. T., Jayachandran, V., Kompalli, S. K., Nair, V. S., Rama Gopal, K., and Babu, S. S.: Spatial gradient of aerosol mass concentrations and size distributions over southeastern Arabian Sea and equatorial Indian Ocean during ICARB-2018, Atmos. Environ., 213, 727–738, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.038</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 31?><mixed-citation>Gong, X., Zhang, C., Chen, H., Nizkorodov, S. A., Chen, J., and Yang, X.: Size distribution and mixing state of black carbon particles during a heavy air pollution episode in Shanghai, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5399–5411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5399-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5399-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 32?><mixed-citation>Gustafsson, Ö., Krusa, M., Zencak, Z., Sheesley, R. J., Granat, L., Engstrom, E., Praveen, P. S., Rao, P. S. P., Leck, C., and Rodhe, H.: Brown clouds over south Asia: Biomass or fossil fuel combustion?, Science, 323, 495–498, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1164857</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page9195?><ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 33?><mixed-citation>Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D., Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H., Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M. E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel, Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D., Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5155–5236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 34?><mixed-citation>Hu, W. W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Croteau, P., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Evaluation of the new capture vapourizer for aerosol mass spectrometers (AMS) through laboratory studies of inorganic species, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2897–2921, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2897-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-2897-2017</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 35?><mixed-citation>Hu, W. W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Croteau, P., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Evaluation of the new capture vaporizer for aerosol mass spectrometers (AMS) through field studies of inorganic species, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 51, 735–754, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1296104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2017.1296104</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 36?><mixed-citation>Huang, X., Ding, A., Liu, L., Liu, Q., Ding, K., Niu, X., Nie, W., Xu, Z., Chi, X., Wang, M., Sun, J., Guo, W., and Fu, C.: Effects of aerosol–radiation interaction on precipitation during biomass-burning season in East China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10063–10082, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10063-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10063-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 40?><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate Change., The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp., 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 39?><mixed-citation>Ivanova, E. V., Khalizov, A. F., and Gor, G. Y.: Kinetic model for competitive condensation of vapor between concave and convex surfaces in a soot aggregate, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 55, 302–315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1846677" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2020.1846677</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 41?><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.: Strong Radiative Heating Due to the Mixing State of Black Carbon in Atmospheric Aerosols, Nature, 409, 695–697, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 42?><mixed-citation>
Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X. F., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an aerosol mass spectrometer for size and composition analysis of submicron particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 49–70, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 43?><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Jayne, J. T., Shi, Q., Kolb, C. E., Worsnop, D. R., Yourshaw, I., Seinfeld, J. H., Flagan, R. C., Zhang, X. F., Smith, K. A., Morris, J. W., and Davidovits, P.: Ambient aerosol sampling using the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001213</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 44?><mixed-citation>Khalizov, A. F., Zhang, R., Zhang, D., Xue, H., Pagels, J., and McMurry, P. H.: Formation of highly hygroscopic soot aerosols upon internal mixing with sulfuric acid vapor, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D05208, 1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010595</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 45?><mixed-citation>Ko, J., Krasowsky, T., and Ban-Weiss, G.: Measurements to determine the mixing state of black carbon emitted from the 2017–2018 California wildfires and urban Los Angeles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15635–15664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15635-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-15635-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 50?><mixed-citation>Kompalli, S. K., Babu, S. S., Moorthy, K. K., Gogoi, M. M., Nair, V. S., and Chaubey, J. P.: Seasonal variation of aerosol black carbon distribution over the Bay of Bengal: multi-campaign measurements, Atmos. Environ., 64, 366–373, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.073</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 48?><mixed-citation>Kompalli, S. K., Babu, S. S., Moorthy, K. K., Manoj, M. R., Kirankumar, N. V. P., Shaeb, K. H. B., and Joshi, A.: Aerosol black carbon characteristics over central India: temporal variation and its dependence on mixed layer height, Atmos. Res., 147–148, 27–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.04.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.04.015</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 49?><mixed-citation>Kompalli, S. K., Moorthy, K. K., and Babu, S. S.: Rapid response of atmospheric BC to anthropogenic sources: observational evidence, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 15, 166–171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/asl2.483" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/asl2.483</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 47?><mixed-citation>Kompalli, S. K., Nair, V. S., Jayachandran, V., Gogoi, M. M., and Babu, S. S.: Particle number size distributions and new particle formation events over the northern Indian Ocean during continental outflow, Atmos. Environ., 238, 117719, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117719" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117719</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 46?><mixed-citation>Kompalli, S. K., Suresh Babu, S. N., Satheesh, S. K., Krishna Moorthy, K., Das, T., Boopathy, R., Liu, D., Darbyshire, E., Allan, J. D., Brooks, J., Flynn, M. J., and Coe, H.: Seasonal contrast in size distributions and mixing state of black carbon and its association with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical composition from the eastern coast of India, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3965–3985, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3965-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3965-2020</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 51?><mixed-citation>Kondo, Y., Matsui, H., Moteki, N., Sahu, L., Takegawa, N., Kajino, M., Zhao, Y., Cubison, M. J., Jimenez, J. L., Vay, S., Diskin, G. S., Anderson, B., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Fuelberg, H. E., Blake, D. R., Huey, G., Weinheimer, A. J., Knapp, D. J., and Brune, W. H.: Emissions of black carbon, organic, and inorganic aerosols from biomass burning in North America and Asia in 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D08204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015152</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 52?><mixed-citation>Köylü, Ü. Ö., Faeth, G. M., Farias, T. L., and Carvalho, M. G.: Fractal and projected structure properties of soot aggregates, Combust. Flame, 100, 621–633, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(94)00147-K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0010-2180(94)00147-K</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 53?><mixed-citation>Krasowsky, T. S., McMeeking, G. R., Sioutas, C., and Ban-Weiss, G.: Characterizing the evolution of physical properties and mixing state of black carbon particles: from near a major highway to the broader urban plume in Los Angeles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11991–12010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11991-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11991-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 54?><mixed-citation>Kütz, S. and Schmidt-Ott, A.: Characterization of agglomerates by condensation-induced restructuring, J. Aerosol Sci., 23, 357–360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(92)90423-S" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-8502(92)90423-S</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 56?><mixed-citation>Laborde, M., Mertes, P., Zieger, P., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., and Gysel, M.: Sensitivity of the Single Particle Soot Photometer to different black carbon types, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1031–1043, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1031-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-1031-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 55?><mixed-citation>Laborde, M., Crippa, M., Tritscher, T., Jurányi, Z., Decarlo, P. F., Temime-Roussel, B., Marchand, N., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., and Gysel, M.: Black carbon physical properties and mixing state in the European megacity Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5831–5856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5831-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5831-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page9196?><ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 57?><mixed-citation> Lambe, A. T., Cappa, C. D., Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Forestieri, S. D., Martin, A. T., Cummings, M. J., Croasdale, D. R., Brune, W. H., Worsnop, D. R., and Davidovits, P.: Relationship between oxidation level and optical properties of secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6349–6357, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 58?><mixed-citation>Lawrence, M. G. and Lelieveld, J.: Atmospheric pollutant outflow from southern Asia: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11017–11096, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 66?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Flynn, M., Gysel, M., Targino, A., Crawford, I., Bower, K., Choularton, T., Jurányi, Z., Steinbacher, M., Hüglin, C., Curtius, J., Kampus, M., Petzold, A., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., and Coe, H.: Single particle characterization of black carbon aerosols at a tropospheric alpine site in Switzerland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7389–7407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7389-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7389-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 65?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Allan, J., Whitehead, J., Young, D., Flynn, M., Coe, H., McFiggans, G., Fleming, Z. L., and Bandy, B.: Ambient black carbon particle hygroscopic properties controlled by mixing state and composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2015–2029, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 64?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Young, D. E., Coe, H., Beddows, D., Fleming, Z. L., Flynn, M. J., Gallagher, M. W., Harrison, R. M., Lee, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Taylor, J. W., Yin, J., Williams, P. I., and Zotter, P.: Size distribution, mixing state and source apportionment of black carbon aerosol in London during wintertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10061–10084, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10061-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10061-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 63?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen, D. V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C., Haslett, S., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T., McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state, Nat. Geosci., 10, 184–188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2901</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 61?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Taylor, J. W., Crosier, J., Marsden, N., Bower, K. N., Lloyd, G., Ryder, C. L., Brooke, J. K., Cotton, R., Marenco, F., Blyth, A., Cui, Z., Estelles, V., Gallagher, M., Coe, H., and Choularton, T. W.: Aircraft and ground measurements of dust aerosols over the west African coast in summer 2015 during ICE-D and AER-D, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3817–3838, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3817-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-3817-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 59?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Joshi, R., Wang, J., Yu, C., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Flynn, M. J., Xie, C., Lee, J., Squires, F., Kotthaus, S., Grimmond, S., Ge, X., Sun, Y., and Fu, P.: Contrasting physical properties of black carbon in urban Beijing between winter and summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6749–6769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6749-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6749-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 67?><mixed-citation> Liu, P. S. K., Deng, R., Smith, K. A., Williams, L. R., Jayne, J. T., Canagaratna, M. R., Moore, K., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., and Deshler, T.: Transmission efficiency of an aerodynamic focusing lens system: comparison of model calculations and laboratory measurements for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Aerosol. Sci. Tech., 41, 721–733, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 62?><mixed-citation>Liu, S., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K., Dubey, M. K., Cappa, C. D., Williams, L. R., Herndon, S. C., Massoli, P., Fortner, E. C., Chhabra, P. S., Brooks, W. A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., China, S., Sharma, N., Mazzoleni, C., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Lee, J. D., Fleming, Z. L., Mohr, C., Zotter, P., Szidat, S., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Enhanced light absorption by mixed source black and brown carbon particles in UK winter, Nat. Commun., 6, 8435, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9435" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms9435</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 68?><mixed-citation> Leith, D. and Peters, T. M.: Concentration Measurement and Counting Efficiency of the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer 3321, J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 627–634, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 69?><mixed-citation>Lund, M. T., Samset, B. H., Skeie, R. B., Watson-Parris, D., Katich, J. M., Schwarz, J. P., and Weinzierl, B.: Short black carbon lifetime inferred from a global set of aircraft observations, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 1, 1–8. <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0040-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-018-0040-x</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 70?><mixed-citation> McFiggans, G., Alfarra, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Hamilton, J. F., Harrison, R. M., Jenkin, M. E., Lewis, A. C., Moller, S. J., and Williams, P. I.: A review of the state-of-the-science relating to secondary particulate matter of relevance to the composition of the UK atmosphere, Full technical report to Defra, project AQ0732, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 72?><mixed-citation>McMeeking, G. R., Hamburger, T., Liu, D., Flynn, M., Morgan, W. T., Northway, M., Highwood, E. J., Krejci, R., Allan, J. D., Minikin, A., and Coe, H.: Black carbon measurements in the boundary layer over western and northern Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9393–9414, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9393-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9393-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 71?><mixed-citation>McMeeking, G. R., Morgan, W. T., Flynn, M., Highwood, E. J., Turnbull, K., Haywood, J., and Coe, H.: Black carbon aerosol mixing state, organic aerosols and aerosol optical properties over the United Kingdom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9037–9052, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9037-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9037-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 73?><mixed-citation> Meehl, G. A., Arblaster, J. M., and Collins, W. D.: Effects of black carbon aerosols on the Indian monsoon, J. Climate, 21, 2869–2882, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 75?><mixed-citation>Meng, C. C., Wang, L. T., Zhang, F. F., Wei, Z., Ma, S. M., Ma, X., Yang, J.: Characteristics of concentrations and water-soluble inorganic ions in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Handan City, Hebei province, China, Atmos. Res., 171, 133–146, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 76?><mixed-citation> Menon, S., Hansen, J., Nazarenko, L., and Luo, Y. F.: Climate effects of black carbon aerosols in China and India, Science, 297, 2250–2253, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 74?><mixed-citation>Metcalf, A. R., Craven, J. S., Ensberg, J. J., Brioude, J., Angevine, W., Sorooshian, A., Duong, H. T., Jonsson, H. H., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Black carbon aerosol over the Los Angeles Basin during CalNex, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D00V13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd017255" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011jd017255</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 77?><mixed-citation>Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 78?><mixed-citation>Miyakawa, T., Oshima, N., Taketani, F., Komazaki, Y., Yoshino, A., Takami, A., Kondo, Y., and Kanaya, Y.: Alteration of the size distributions and mixing states of black carbon through transport in the boundary layer in east Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5851–5864, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5851-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-5851-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 79?><mixed-citation>
Moffet, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: In-situ measurements of the mixing state and optical properties of soot with implications for radiative forcing estimates, PNAS, 106, 11872–11877, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 80?><mixed-citation>Molina, M. J., Ivanov, A. V., Trakhtenberg, S., and Molina, L. T.: Atmospheric evolution of organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L22104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020910" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004gl020910</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page9197?><ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 83?><mixed-citation>Moorthy, K. K., Sunilkumar, S. V., Pillai, P. S., Parameswaran, K., Nair, P. R., Ahmed, Y. N., Ramgopal, K., Narasimhulu, K., Reddy, R. R., Vinoj, V., Satheesh, S. K., Niranjan, K., Rao, B. M., Brahmanandam, P. S., Saha, A., Badarinath, K. V. S., Kiranchand, T. R., and Latha, K. M.: Wintertime spatial characteristics of boundary layer aerosols over peninsular India, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D08207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005520" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005520</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 82?><mixed-citation>
Moorthy, K. K., Satheesh, S. K., Babu, S. S., and Dutt, C. B. S.: Integrated campaign for aerosols, gases, and radiation budget (ICARB): an overview, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 117, 243–262, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 81?><mixed-citation>Moorthy, K. K., Satheesh, S. K., Sarin, M. M., and Panday, A. K.: South Asian aerosols in perspective: Preface to the special issue, Atmos. Environ., 125, 307–311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.073</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 84?><mixed-citation>
Moteki, N. and Kondo, Y.: Effects of mixing state on black carbon measurements by laser-induced incandescence, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 398–417, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 86?><mixed-citation>
Moteki, N. and Kondo, Y.: Dependence of laser-induced incandescence on physical properties of black carbon aerosols: Measurements and theoretical interpretation, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 663–675, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 85?><mixed-citation>Moteki, N., Kondo, Y., Miyazaki, Y., Takegawa, N., Komazaki, Y., Kurata, G., Shirai, T., Blake, D., Miyakawa, T., and Koike, M.: Evolution of mixing state of black carbon particles: Aircraft measurements over the western Pacific in March 2004, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L11803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028943" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL028943</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moteki, N., Kondo, Y., and Nakamura, S.: Method to measure refractive indices of small nonspherical particles: Application to black carbon particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 41, 513–521, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 87?><mixed-citation>Nair, V. S., Jayachandran, V. N., Kompalli, S. K., Gogoi, M. M., and Babu, S. S.: Cloud condensation nuclei properties of South Asian outflow over the northern Indian Ocean during winter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3135–3149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3135-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3135-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 88?><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L., Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q. , Sun, Y. L., and Jayne, J. T.: An Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) for Routine Monitoring of the Composition and Mass Concentrations of Ambient Aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 780–794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.560211</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 89?><mixed-citation>Pagels, J., Khalizov, A. F., McMurry, P. H., and Zhang, R. Y.: Processing of Soot by Controlled Sulphuric Acid and Water Condensation Mass and Mobility Relationship, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 629–640, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820902810685" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820902810685</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 90?><mixed-citation> Pandey, A., Sadavarte, P., Rao, A. B., and Venkataraman, C.: Trends in multi-pollutant emissions from a technology-linked inventory for India: II. Residential, agricultural and informal industry sectors, Atmos. Environ., 99, 341–352, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 91?><mixed-citation>Park, K., Kittelson, D., Zachariah, M., and McMurry, P.: Measurement of Inherent Material Density of Nanoparticle Agglomerates, J. Nanopart. Res., 6, 267–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 92?><mixed-citation>Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y.-S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C. R., Collins, D. R., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1602310113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 93?><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting ”black carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 94?><mixed-citation>Prasad, P., Ramana, R., Venkat Ratnam, M., Chen, W., Vijaya Bhaskara Rao, S., Gogoi, M. M., Kompalli, S. K., Kumar, K. S., and Babu, S. S.: Characterization of atmospheric Black Carbon over a semi-urban site of Southeast India: Local sources and long-range transport, Atmos. Res., 213, 411–421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.06.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.06.024</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 95?><mixed-citation> Ramanathan, V. and Carmichael, G.: Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon, Nat. Geosci., 1, 221–227, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 97?><mixed-citation>Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Lelieveld, J., Mitra, A. P., Althausen, D., Anderson, J., Andreae, M. O., Cantrell, W., Cass, G. R., Chung, C. E., Clarke, A. D., Coakley, J. A., Collins, W. D., Conant, W. C., Dulac, F., Heintzenberg, J., Heymsfield, A. J., Holben, B., Howell, S., Hudson, J., Jayaraman, A., Kiehl, J. T., Krishnamurti, T. N., Lubin, D., McFarquhar, G., Novakov, T., Ogren, J. A., Podgorny, I. A., Prather, K., Priestley, K., Prospero, J. M., Quinn, P. K., Rajeev, K., Rasch, P., Rupert, S., Sadourny, R., Satheesh, S. K., Shaw, G. E., Sheridan, P., and Valero, F. P. J.: Indian Ocean Experiment: An integrated analysis of the climate forcing and effects of the greatIndo-Asian haze, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 28371–28398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900133" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD900133</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 96?><mixed-citation> Ramanathan, V., Chung, C., Kim, D., Bettge, T., Buja, L., Kiehl, J. T., Washington, W. M., Fu, Q., Sikka, D. R., and Wild, M.: Atmospheric brown clouds: Impacts on South Asian climate and hydrological cycle, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 5326–5333, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 99?><mixed-citation>Raatikainen, T., Brus, D., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Svensson, J., Asmi, E., and Lihavainen, H.: Black carbon concentrations and mixing state in the Finnish Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10057–10070, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10057-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10057-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 98?><mixed-citation>Raatikainen, T., Brus, D., Hooda, R. K., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Asmi, E., Sharma, V. P., Arola, A., and Lihavainen, H.: Size-selected black carbon mass distributions and mixing state in polluted and clean environments of northern India, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 371–383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-371-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-371-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 100?><mixed-citation>Reddington, C. L., McMeeking, G., Mann, G. W., Coe, H., Frontoso, M. G., Liu, D., Flynn, M., Spracklen, D. V., and Carslaw, K. S.: The mass and number size distributions of black carbon aerosol over Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4917–4939, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4917-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4917-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 101?><mixed-citation>Sahu, L. K., Kondo, Y., Moteki, N., Takegawa, N., Zhao, Y., Cubison, M. J., Jimenez, J. L., Vay, S., Diskin, G. S., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Huey, L. G., Weinheimer, A. J., and Knapp, D. J.: Emission characteristics of black carbon in anthropogenic and solid fuel burning plumes over California during ARCTAS-CARB 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D16302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017401</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 102?><mixed-citation>Schnaiter, M., Linke, C., Möhler, O., Naumann, K. H., Saathoff, H., Wagner, R., Schurath, U., and Wehner, B.: Absorption amplification of black carbon internally mixed w<?pagebreak page9198?>ith secondary organic aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D19204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006046</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 103?><mixed-citation>Schnitzler, E. G., Gac, J. M., and Jäger, W.: Coating surface tension dependence of soot aggregate restructuring, J. Aerosol Sci., 106, 43–55, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.01.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.01.005</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 105?><mixed-citation>Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Spackman, J. R., Watts, L. A., Thomson, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Ryerson, T. B., Peischl, J., Holloway, J. S., Trainer, M., Frost, G. J., Baynard, T., Lack, D. A., de Gouw, J. A., Warneke, C., and Del Negro, L. A.: Measurement of the mixing state, mass, and optical size of individual black carbon particles in urban and biomass burning emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L13810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033968" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL033968</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 104?><mixed-citation>Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Perring, A. E., Spackman, J. R., and Fahey, D. W.: Black carbon aerosol size in snow, Sci. Rep., 3, 1356, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep01356</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 106?><mixed-citation>Sedlacek III, A. J., Lewis, E. R., Kleinman, L., Xu, J., and Zhang, Q. Determination of and evidence for noncore-shell structure of particles containing black carbon using the Single-Particle Soot Photometer (SP2), Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050905" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL050905</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 107?><mixed-citation>Sedlacek III, A. J., Onasch, T. B., Nichman, L., Lewis, E. R., Davidovits, P., Freedman, A., and Williams, L.: Formation of refractory black carbon by SP2-induced charring of organic aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 52, 1345–1350, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1531107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2018.1531107</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 108?><mixed-citation>Shank, L. M., Howell, S., Clarke, A. D., Freitag, S., Brekhovskikh, V., Kapustin, V., McNaughton, C., Campos, T., and Wood, R.: Organic matter and non-refractory aerosol over the remote Southeast Pacific: oceanic and combustion sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 557–576, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-557-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-557-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 109?><mixed-citation>Sharma, S., Leaitch, W. R., Huang, L., Veber, D., Kolonjari, F., Zhang, W., Hanna, S. J., Bertram, A. K., and Ogren, J. A.: An evaluation of three methods for measuring black carbon in Alert, Canada, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 15225–15243, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15225-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-15225-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 110?><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Kondo, Y., Moteki, N., Takegawa, N., Miyazaki, Y., and Blake, D. R.: Evolution of mixing state of black carbon in polluted air from Tokyo, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L16803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029819" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL029819</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><?label 111?><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Kondo, Y., Moteki, N., Takegawa, N., Sahu, L. K., Takami, A., Hatakeyama, S., Yonemura, S., and Blake, D. R.: Radiative impact of mixing state of black carbon aerosol in Asian outflow, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D24210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010546" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd010546</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><?label 112?><mixed-citation> Shiraiwa, M., Kondo, Y., Iwamoto, T., and Kita, K.: Amplification of light absorption of black carbon by organic coating, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 46–54, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><?label 113?><mixed-citation>Slowik, J. G., Cross, E. S., Han, J.-H., Davidovits, P., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Williams, L. R., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmueller, H., Arnott, W. P., Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R.-S., Fahey, D. W., Kok, G. L., and Petzold, A.: An inter-comparison of instruments measuring black carbon content of soot particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 295–314, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701197078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820701197078</ext-link>, 2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><?label 114?><mixed-citation>Slowik, J. G., Cross, E. S., Han, J.-H., Kolucki, J., Davidovits, P., Williams, L. R., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Measurements of morphology changes of fractal soot particles using coating and denuding experiments: Implications for optical absorption and atmospheric lifetime, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 734–750, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701432632" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820701432632</ext-link>, 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><?label 115?><mixed-citation>Srinivas, B. and Sarin, M. M.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, EC and OC in atmospheric outflow from the Indo-Gangetic Plain: Temporal variability and aerosol organic carbon-to-organic mass conversion factor, Sci. Total Environ., 487, 196–205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.002</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><?label 116?><mixed-citation>Srivastava, R. and Ramachandran, S.: The mixing state of aerosols over the Indo-Gangetic Plain and its impact on radiative forcing, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 137–151. <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1958" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.1958</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><?label 117?><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, H., Yang, T., Li, J., Pan, X., Chen, P., and Jayne, T. P.: Characterization of Summer Organic and Inorganic Aerosols in Beijing, China with an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor, Atmos. Environ., 51, 250–259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><?label 118?><mixed-citation>Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., Liu, D., Flynn, M., Weber, R., Zhang, X., Lefer, B. L., Grossberg, N., Flynn, J., and Coe, H.: Assessment of the sensitivity of core / shell parameters derived using the single-particle soot photometer to density and refractive index, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1701–1718, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1701-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1701-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><?label 119?><mixed-citation>Taylor, J. W., Wu, H., Szpek, K., Bower, K., Crawford, I., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I., Dorsey, J., Langridge, J. M., Cotterell, M. I., Fox, C., Davies, N. W., Haywood, J. M., and Coe, H.: Absorption closure in highly aged biomass burning smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11201–11221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><?label 120?><mixed-citation>Thamban, N. M., Tripathi, S. N., Shamjad P. M., Kuntamukkala, P., and Kanawade, V. P.: Internally mixed black carbon in the Indo-Gangetic Plain and its effect on absorption enhancement, Atmos. Res., 197, 211–223, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.07.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.07.007</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><?label 122?><mixed-citation>Ueda, S., Nakayama, T., Taketani, F., Adachi, K., Matsuki, A., Iwamoto, Y., Sadanaga, Y., and Matsumi, Y.: Light absorption and morphological properties of soot-containing aerosols observed at an East Asian outflow site, Noto Peninsula, Japan, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2525–2541, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2525-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2525-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><?label 121?><mixed-citation>Ueda, S., Osada, K., Hara, K., Yabuki, M., Hashihama, F., and Kanda, J.: Morphological features and mixing states of soot-containing particles in the marine boundary layer over the Indian and Southern oceans, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9207–9224, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9207-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-9207-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><?label 123?><mixed-citation> Unger, N., Shindell, D. T., Koch, D. M., and Streets D. G.: Cross Influences of Ozone and Sulfate Precursor Emissions Changes on Air Quality and Climate, PNAS, 103, 4377–4380, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><?label 124?><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Liu, D., Ge, X., Wu, Y., Shen, F., Chen, M., Zhao, J., Xie, C., Wang, Q., Xu, W., Zhang, J., Hu, J., Allan, J., Joshi, R., Fu, P., Coe, H., and Sun, Y.: Characterization of black carbon-containing fine particles in Beijing during wintertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 447–458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-447-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-447-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page9199?><ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><?label 125?><mixed-citation>Wang, Q., Cao, J., Han, Y., Tian, J., Zhu, C., Zhang, Y., Zhang, N., Shen, Z., Ni, H., Zhao, S., and Wu, J.: Sources and physicochemical characteristics of black carbon aerosol from the southeastern Tibetan Plateau: internal mixing enhances light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4639–4656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4639-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-4639-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><?label 127?><mixed-citation>Weingartner, E., Burtscher, H., and Baltensperger, U.: Growth and structural change of combustion aerosols at high relative humidity, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29, 2982–2986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00012a014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00012a014</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><?label 126?><mixed-citation> Wiedensohler, A.: An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range, J. Aerosol Sci., 19, 387–389, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><?label 128?><mixed-citation>Xu, W., Croteau, P., Williams, L., Canagaratna, M., Onasch, T., Cross, E., Zhang, X., Robinson, W., Worsnop, D., and Jayne, J.: Laboratory characterization of an aerosol chemical speciation monitor with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PM</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement capability, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 51, 69–83, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1241859" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2016.1241859</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><?label 129?><mixed-citation>Xue, H. X., Khalizov, A. F., Wang, L., Zheng, J., and Zhang, R. Y.: Effects of Coating of Dicarboxylic Acids on the Mass-Mobility Relationship of Soot Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2787–2792, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803287v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es803287v</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><?label 130?><mixed-citation>Zanatta, M., Laj, P., Gysel, M., Baltensperger, U., Vratolis, S., Eleftheriadis, K., Kondo, Y., Dubuisson, P., Winiarek, V., Kazadzis, S., Tunved, P., and Jacobi, H.-W.: Effects of mixing state on optical and radiative properties of black carbon in the European Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14037–14057, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14037-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14037-2018</ext-link>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><?label 132?><mixed-citation>Zhang, J., Liu, J., Tao, S., and Ban-Weiss, G. A.: Long-range transport of black carbon to the Pacific Ocean and its dependence on aging timescale, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11521–11535, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11521-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11521-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><?label 131?><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Khalizov, A. F., Pagels, J., Zhang, D., Xue, H., and McMurry, P. H.: Variability in morphology, hygroscopicity, and optical properties of soot aerosols during atmospheric processing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 10291–10296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804860105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0804860105</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><?label 133?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., Cheng, Y., Su, H., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., Wu, Z., Hu, M., Zhu, T., Wiedensohler, A., and He, K.: Measuring the morphology and density of internally mixed black carbon with SP2 and VTDMA: new insight into the absorption enhancement of black carbon in the atmosphere, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1833–1843, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1833-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-1833-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><?label 134?><mixed-citation>Zorn, S. R., Drewnick, F., Schott, M., Hoffmann, T., and Borrmann, S.: Characterization of the South Atlantic marine boundary layer aerosol using an aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4711–4728, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4711-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-4711-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Mixing state of refractory black carbon aerosol in the South Asian outflow over the northern Indian Ocean during winter</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Regional climatic implications of aerosol black carbon (BC), which has a wide variety of anthropogenic sources in large abundance, are well recognized over South Asia. Significant uncertainties remain in its quantification due to a lack of sufficient information on the microphysical properties (its concentration, size, and mixing state with other aerosol components) that determine the absorption potential of BC. In particular, the information on the mixing state of BC is extremely sparse over this region. In this study, the first observations of the size distribution and mixing state of individual refractory black carbon (rBC) particles in the South Asian outflow to the south-eastern Arabian Sea and the northern and equatorial Indian Ocean regions are presented based on measurements using a single particle soot photometer (SP2) aboard the Integrated Campaign for Aerosols, gases, and Radiation Budget (ICARB-2018) ship during winter 2018 (16 January to 13 February). The results revealed significant spatial heterogeneity of BC characteristics. The highest rBC mass concentrations ( ∼ 938±293&thinsp;ng m<sup>−3</sup>) with the highest relative coating thickness (RCT; the ratio of BC core to its coating diameters) of  ∼ 2.16±0.19 are found over the south-east Arabian Sea (SEAS) region, which is in the proximity of the continental outflow. As we move to farther oceanic regions, though the mass concentrations decreased by nearly half ( ∼ 546±80&thinsp;ng m<sup>−3</sup>), BC still remained thickly coated (RCT ∼ 2.05±0.07). The air over the remote equatorial Indian Ocean, which received considerable marine air masses compared to the other regions, showed the lowest rBC mass concentrations ( ∼ 206±114&thinsp;ng m<sup>−3</sup>) with a moderately thick coating (RCT ∼ 1.73±0.16). Even over oceanic regions far from the landmass, regions that received the outflow from the more industrialized east coast/the Bay of Bengal had a thicker coating ( ∼ 104&thinsp;nm) compared to regions that received outflow from the west coast and/or peninsular India ( ∼ 86&thinsp;nm). Although different regions of the ocean depicted contrasting concentrations and mixing state parameters due to the varied extent and nature of the continental outflow as well as the atmospheric lifetime of air masses, the modal parameters of rBC mass–size distributions (mean mass median diameters  ∼ &thinsp;0.19–0.20&thinsp;µm) were similar over all regions. The mean fraction of BC-containing particles (<i>F</i><sub>BC</sub>) varied in the range of 0.08–0.12 (suggesting significant amounts of non-BC particles), whereas the bulk mixing ratio of coating mass to rBC mass was highest (8.31±2.40) over the outflow regions compared to the remote ocean (4.24±1.45), highlighting the role of outflow in providing condensable material for coatings on rBC. These parameters, along with the information on the size-resolved mixing state of BC cores, throw light on the role of sources and secondary processing of their complex mixtures for coatings on BC under highly polluted conditions. Examination of the non-refractory sub-micrometre aerosol chemical composition obtained using the aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) suggested that the overall aerosol system was sulfate-dominated over the far-oceanic regions. In contrast, organics were equally prominent adjacent to the coastal landmass. An association between the BC mixing state and aerosol chemical composition suggested that sulfate was the probable dominant coating material on rBC cores.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation> Adachi, K., Chung, S. H., and Buseck, P. R.: Shapes of soot aerosol particles and implications for their effects on climate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D15206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012868</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation> Adachi, K., Zaizen, Y., Kajino, M., and Igarashi, Y.: Mixing state of regionally transported soot particles and the coating effect on their size and shape at a mountain site in Japan, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 5386–5396, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020880</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Allan, J., Jimenez, J., Williams, P., Alfarra, M., Bower, K., Jayne, J., Coe, H., and Worsnop, D.: Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer: 1. Techniques of data interpretation and error analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD001607" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD001607</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Allan, J., Delia, A. E., Coe, H., Bower, K. N., Alfrarra, R., Jimenez, J. L., Middlebrook, A. M., Drewnick, F., Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J., and Worsnop, D. R.: Technical note: a generalised method for the extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer data, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 909–922, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation> Asnani, G. C.: Tropical Meteorology, Vol.1 and Vol.2, Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pashan, Pune, 1012 pp., 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation> Aswini A. R., Hegde P., Aryasree S., Girach I. A., and Nair P. R.: Continental outflow of anthropogenic aerosols over Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean during wintertime: ICARB-2018 campaign, Sci. Total Environ., 712, 135214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135214" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135214</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation> Babu, S. S., Moorthy, K. K., Manchanda, R. K., Sinha, P. R., Satheesh, S. K., Vajja, D. P., Srinivasan, S., and Kumar, V. H. A.: Free tropospheric black carbon aerosol measurements using high altitude balloon: Do BC layers build their own homes up in the atmosphere?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L08803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL046654" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL046654</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation> Babu, S. S., Gogoi, M. M., Kumar, V. H. A., Nair, V. S., and Moorthy, K. K.: Radiative properties of Bay of Bengal aerosols: Spatial distinctiveness and source impacts, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D06213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017355" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017355</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> Babu, S. S., Manoj, M. R., Moorthy, K. K., Gogoi, M. M., Nair, V. S., Kompalli, S. K., Satheesh, S. K., Niranjan, K., Ramagopal, K., Bhuyan, P. K., and Singh, D.: Trends in aerosol optical depth over Indian region: Potential causes and impact indicators, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 11794–11806, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation> Bollasina, M., Nigam, S., and Lau, K.-M.: Absorbing Aerosols and Summer Monsoon Evolution over South Asia: An Observational Portrayal, J. Climate, 21, 3221–3239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI2094.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI2094.1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light absorption by carbonaceous particles: An investigative review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 27–67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation> Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., De Angelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Karcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M., Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K., Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U., Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C. S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Boos, W. R. and Storelvmo, T.: Near-linear response of mean monsoon strength to a broad range of radiative forcings, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 1510–1515, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517143113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517143113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation> Brooks, J., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Williams, P. I., Haywood, J., Highwood, E. J., Kompalli, S. K., Babu, S. S., Satheesh, S. K., Turner, A. G., and Coe, H.: Black carbon physical and optical properties across northern India during pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13079–13096, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13079-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13079-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Budisulistiorini, S. H., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E. S., Bairai, S. T., Mueller, S., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Seasonal characterization of submicron aerosol chemical composition and organic aerosol sources in the southeastern United States: Atlanta, Georgia,and Look Rock, Tennessee, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5171–5189, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5171-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5171-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation> Canagaratna, M., Jayne, J., Jimenez, J., Allan, J., Alfarra, M., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia, A., Williams, L., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., DeCarlo, P., Kolb, C., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D.: Chemical and microphysical characterisation of ambient aerosols with the Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/Mas.20115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/Mas.20115</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation> Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Worsnop, D. R., Bates, T. S., Cross, E. S., Davidovits, P., Hakala, J., Hayden, K. L., Jobson, B. T., Kolesar, K. R., Lack, D. A., Lerner, B. M., Li, S.-M., Mellon, D., Nuaaman, I., Olfert, J. S., Petäjä, T., Quinn, P. K., Song, C., Subramanian, R., Williams, E. J., and Zaveri, R. A.: Radiative Absorption Enhancements Due to the Mixing State of Atmospheric Black Carbon, Science, 337, 1078–1081, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Cappa, C. D., Zhang, X., Russell, L. M., Collier, S., Lee, A. K. Y., Chen, C.-L., Betha, R., Chen, S., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Sanchez, K. J., McMeeking, G. R., Williams, L. R., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Abbatt, J., and Zhang, Q.: Light absorption by ambient black and brown carbon and its dependence on black carbon coating state for two California, USA, cities in winter and summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1550–1577, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029501" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029501</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> Chen, C., Fan, X., Shaltout, T., Qiu, C., Ma, Y., Goldman, A., and Khalizov, A. F.: An unexpected restructuring of combustion soot aggregates by subnanometer coatings of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11080–11088, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070877" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070877</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Chen, C., Enekwizu, O. Y., Fan, X., Dobrzanski, C. D., Ivanova, E. V., Ma, Y., Gor, G. Y., and Khalizov, A. F.: Single parameter for predicting the morphology of atmospheric black carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 14169–14179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04201</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation> Cheng, Y., Li, S.-M., Gordon, M., and Liu, P.: Size distribution and coating thickness of black carbon from the Canadian oil sands operations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2653–2667, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2653-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2653-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Clarke, A. D. and Kapustin, V. N.: A Pacific aerosol survey: I. A decade of data on particle production, transport, evolution, and mixing in the troposphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 363–382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0363:APASPI&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0363:APASPI&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation> Darbyshire, E., Morgan, W. T., Allan, J. D., Liu, D., Flynn, M. J., Dorsey, J. R., O'Shea, S. J., Lowe, D., Szpek, K., Marenco, F., Johnson, B. T., Bauguitte, S., Haywood, J. M., Brito, J. F., Artaxo, P., Longo, K. M., and Coe, H.: The vertical distribution of biomass burning pollution over tropical South America from aircraft in situ measurements during SAMBBA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5771–5790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5771-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5771-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation> Das, P. K.: The Monsoons, 5th IMO Lecture, WMO Rep. 613, World Meteorol. Org., Geneva, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation> DeCarlo, P. F., Ulbrich, I. M., Crounse, J., de Foy, B., Dunlea, E. J., Aiken, A. C., Knapp, D., Weinheimer, A. J., Campos, T., Wennberg, P. O., and Jimenez, J. L.: Investigation of the sources and processing of organic aerosol over the Central Mexican Plateau from aircraft measurements during MILAGRO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5257–5280, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation> Ditas, J., Ma, N., Zhang, Y., Assmann, D., Neumaier, M., Riede, H., Karu, E., Williams, J., Scharffe, D., Wang, Q., Saturno, J., Schwarz, J. P., Katich, J. M., McMeeking, G. R., Zahn, A., Hermann, M., Brenninkmeijer, C. A., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., Su, H., and Cheng, Y.: Strong impact of wildfires on the abundance and aging of black carbon in the lowermost stratosphere, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, E11595–E11603, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806868115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806868115</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation> D'Errico, M., Cagnazzo, C., Fogli, P. G., Lau, W. K. M., von Hardenberg, J., Fierli, F., and Cherchi, A.: Indian monsoon and the elevated-heat-pump mechanism in a coupled aerosol climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 8712–8723, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023346" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023346</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation> Gao, R. S., Schwarz, J. P., Kelly, K. K., Fahey, D. W., Watts, L. A., Thompson, T. L., Spackman, J. R., Slowik, J. G., Cross, E. S., Han, J. H., Davidovits, P., Onasch, T. B., and Worsnop, D. R.: A novel method for estimating light-scattering properties of soot aerosols using a modified single-particle soot photometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 125–135, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Gogoi, M. M., Rao C. T., Jayachandran, V., Kompalli, S. K., Nair, V. S., Rama Gopal, K., and Babu, S. S.: Spatial gradient of aerosol mass concentrations and size distributions over southeastern Arabian Sea and equatorial Indian Ocean during ICARB-2018, Atmos. Environ., 213, 727–738, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.038</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Gong, X., Zhang, C., Chen, H., Nizkorodov, S. A., Chen, J., and Yang, X.: Size distribution and mixing state of black carbon particles during a heavy air pollution episode in Shanghai, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5399–5411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5399-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5399-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Gustafsson, Ö., Krusa, M., Zencak, Z., Sheesley, R. J., Granat, L., Engstrom, E., Praveen, P. S., Rao, P. S. P., Leck, C., and Rodhe, H.: Brown clouds over south Asia: Biomass or fossil fuel combustion?, Science, 323, 495–498, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164857" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164857</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D., Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H., Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M. E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel, Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D., Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5155–5236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W. W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Croteau, P., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Evaluation of the new capture vapourizer for aerosol mass spectrometers (AMS) through laboratory studies of inorganic species, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2897–2921, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2897-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2897-2017</a>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W. W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Croteau, P., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Evaluation of the new capture vaporizer for aerosol mass spectrometers (AMS) through field studies of inorganic species, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 51, 735–754, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1296104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1296104</a>, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, X., Ding, A., Liu, L., Liu, Q., Ding, K., Niu, X., Nie, W., Xu, Z., Chi, X., Wang, M., Sun, J., Guo, W., and Fu, C.: Effects of aerosol–radiation interaction on precipitation during biomass-burning season in East China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10063–10082, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10063-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10063-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate Change., The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp., 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Ivanova, E. V., Khalizov, A. F., and Gor, G. Y.: Kinetic model for competitive condensation of vapor between concave and convex surfaces in a soot aggregate, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 55, 302–315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1846677" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1846677</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.: Strong Radiative Heating Due to the Mixing State of Black Carbon in Atmospheric Aerosols, Nature, 409, 695–697, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X. F., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an aerosol mass spectrometer for size and composition analysis of submicron particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 49–70, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Jayne, J. T., Shi, Q., Kolb, C. E., Worsnop, D. R., Yourshaw, I., Seinfeld, J. H., Flagan, R. C., Zhang, X. F., Smith, K. A., Morris, J. W., and Davidovits, P.: Ambient aerosol sampling using the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001213" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001213</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation> Khalizov, A. F., Zhang, R., Zhang, D., Xue, H., Pagels, J., and McMurry, P. H.: Formation of highly hygroscopic soot aerosols upon internal mixing with sulfuric acid vapor, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D05208, 1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010595" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010595</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation> Ko, J., Krasowsky, T., and Ban-Weiss, G.: Measurements to determine the mixing state of black carbon emitted from the 2017–2018 California wildfires and urban Los Angeles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15635–15664, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15635-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15635-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation> Kompalli, S. K., Babu, S. S., Moorthy, K. K., Gogoi, M. M., Nair, V. S., and Chaubey, J. P.: Seasonal variation of aerosol black carbon distribution over the Bay of Bengal: multi-campaign measurements, Atmos. Environ., 64, 366–373, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.073</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation> Kompalli, S. K., Babu, S. S., Moorthy, K. K., Manoj, M. R., Kirankumar, N. V. P., Shaeb, K. H. B., and Joshi, A.: Aerosol black carbon characteristics over central India: temporal variation and its dependence on mixed layer height, Atmos. Res., 147–148, 27–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.04.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.04.015</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation> Kompalli, S. K., Moorthy, K. K., and Babu, S. S.: Rapid response of atmospheric BC to anthropogenic sources: observational evidence, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 15, 166–171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/asl2.483" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/asl2.483</a>, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation> Kompalli, S. K., Nair, V. S., Jayachandran, V., Gogoi, M. M., and Babu, S. S.: Particle number size distributions and new particle formation events over the northern Indian Ocean during continental outflow, Atmos. Environ., 238, 117719, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117719" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117719</a>, 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation> Kompalli, S. K., Suresh Babu, S. N., Satheesh, S. K., Krishna Moorthy, K., Das, T., Boopathy, R., Liu, D., Darbyshire, E., Allan, J. D., Brooks, J., Flynn, M. J., and Coe, H.: Seasonal contrast in size distributions and mixing state of black carbon and its association with PM<sub>1.0</sub> chemical composition from the eastern coast of India, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3965–3985, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3965-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3965-2020</a>, 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation> Kondo, Y., Matsui, H., Moteki, N., Sahu, L., Takegawa, N., Kajino, M., Zhao, Y., Cubison, M. J., Jimenez, J. L., Vay, S., Diskin, G. S., Anderson, B., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Fuelberg, H. E., Blake, D. R., Huey, G., Weinheimer, A. J., Knapp, D. J., and Brune, W. H.: Emissions of black carbon, organic, and inorganic aerosols from biomass burning in North America and Asia in 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D08204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015152</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation> Köylü, Ü. Ö., Faeth, G. M., Farias, T. L., and Carvalho, M. G.: Fractal and projected structure properties of soot aggregates, Combust. Flame, 100, 621–633, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(94)00147-K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(94)00147-K</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation> Krasowsky, T. S., McMeeking, G. R., Sioutas, C., and Ban-Weiss, G.: Characterizing the evolution of physical properties and mixing state of black carbon particles: from near a major highway to the broader urban plume in Los Angeles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11991–12010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11991-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11991-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Kütz, S. and Schmidt-Ott, A.: Characterization of agglomerates by condensation-induced restructuring, J. Aerosol Sci., 23, 357–360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(92)90423-S" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(92)90423-S</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation> Laborde, M., Mertes, P., Zieger, P., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., and Gysel, M.: Sensitivity of the Single Particle Soot Photometer to different black carbon types, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1031–1043, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1031-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1031-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation> Laborde, M., Crippa, M., Tritscher, T., Jurányi, Z., Decarlo, P. F., Temime-Roussel, B., Marchand, N., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., and Gysel, M.: Black carbon physical properties and mixing state in the European megacity Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5831–5856, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5831-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5831-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation> Lambe, A. T., Cappa, C. D., Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Forestieri, S. D., Martin, A. T., Cummings, M. J., Croasdale, D. R., Brune, W. H., Worsnop, D. R., and Davidovits, P.: Relationship between oxidation level and optical properties of secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6349–6357, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation> Lawrence, M. G. and Lelieveld, J.: Atmospheric pollutant outflow from southern Asia: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11017–11096, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation> Liu, D., Flynn, M., Gysel, M., Targino, A., Crawford, I., Bower, K., Choularton, T., Jurányi, Z., Steinbacher, M., Hüglin, C., Curtius, J., Kampus, M., Petzold, A., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., and Coe, H.: Single particle characterization of black carbon aerosols at a tropospheric alpine site in Switzerland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7389–7407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7389-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7389-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation> Liu, D., Allan, J., Whitehead, J., Young, D., Flynn, M., Coe, H., McFiggans, G., Fleming, Z. L., and Bandy, B.: Ambient black carbon particle hygroscopic properties controlled by mixing state and composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2015–2029, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation> Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Young, D. E., Coe, H., Beddows, D., Fleming, Z. L., Flynn, M. J., Gallagher, M. W., Harrison, R. M., Lee, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Taylor, J. W., Yin, J., Williams, P. I., and Zotter, P.: Size distribution, mixing state and source apportionment of black carbon aerosol in London during wintertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10061–10084, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10061-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10061-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation> Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen, D. V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C., Haslett, S., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T., McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state, Nat. Geosci., 10, 184–188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation> Liu, D., Taylor, J. W., Crosier, J., Marsden, N., Bower, K. N., Lloyd, G., Ryder, C. L., Brooke, J. K., Cotton, R., Marenco, F., Blyth, A., Cui, Z., Estelles, V., Gallagher, M., Coe, H., and Choularton, T. W.: Aircraft and ground measurements of dust aerosols over the west African coast in summer 2015 during ICE-D and AER-D, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3817–3838, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3817-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3817-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation> Liu, D., Joshi, R., Wang, J., Yu, C., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Flynn, M. J., Xie, C., Lee, J., Squires, F., Kotthaus, S., Grimmond, S., Ge, X., Sun, Y., and Fu, P.: Contrasting physical properties of black carbon in urban Beijing between winter and summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6749–6769, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6749-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6749-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation> Liu, P. S. K., Deng, R., Smith, K. A., Williams, L. R., Jayne, J. T., Canagaratna, M. R., Moore, K., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., and Deshler, T.: Transmission efficiency of an aerodynamic focusing lens system: comparison of model calculations and laboratory measurements for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Aerosol. Sci. Tech., 41, 721–733, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation> Liu, S., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K., Dubey, M. K., Cappa, C. D., Williams, L. R., Herndon, S. C., Massoli, P., Fortner, E. C., Chhabra, P. S., Brooks, W. A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., China, S., Sharma, N., Mazzoleni, C., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Lee, J. D., Fleming, Z. L., Mohr, C., Zotter, P., Szidat, S., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Enhanced light absorption by mixed source black and brown carbon particles in UK winter, Nat. Commun., 6, 8435, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9435" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9435</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation> Leith, D. and Peters, T. M.: Concentration Measurement and Counting Efficiency of the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer 3321, J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 627–634, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation> Lund, M. T., Samset, B. H., Skeie, R. B., Watson-Parris, D., Katich, J. M., Schwarz, J. P., and Weinzierl, B.: Short black carbon lifetime inferred from a global set of aircraft observations, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 1, 1–8. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0040-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0040-x</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation> McFiggans, G., Alfarra, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Hamilton, J. F., Harrison, R. M., Jenkin, M. E., Lewis, A. C., Moller, S. J., and Williams, P. I.: A review of the state-of-the-science relating to secondary particulate matter of relevance to the composition of the UK atmosphere, Full technical report to Defra, project AQ0732, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation> McMeeking, G. R., Hamburger, T., Liu, D., Flynn, M., Morgan, W. T., Northway, M., Highwood, E. J., Krejci, R., Allan, J. D., Minikin, A., and Coe, H.: Black carbon measurements in the boundary layer over western and northern Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9393–9414, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9393-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9393-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation> McMeeking, G. R., Morgan, W. T., Flynn, M., Highwood, E. J., Turnbull, K., Haywood, J., and Coe, H.: Black carbon aerosol mixing state, organic aerosols and aerosol optical properties over the United Kingdom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9037–9052, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9037-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9037-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation> Meehl, G. A., Arblaster, J. M., and Collins, W. D.: Effects of black carbon aerosols on the Indian monsoon, J. Climate, 21, 2869–2882, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation> Meng, C. C., Wang, L. T., Zhang, F. F., Wei, Z., Ma, S. M., Ma, X., Yang, J.: Characteristics of concentrations and water-soluble inorganic ions in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Handan City, Hebei province, China, Atmos. Res., 171, 133–146, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation> Menon, S., Hansen, J., Nazarenko, L., and Luo, Y. F.: Climate effects of black carbon aerosols in China and India, Science, 297, 2250–2253, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation> Metcalf, A. R., Craven, J. S., Ensberg, J. J., Brioude, J., Angevine, W., Sorooshian, A., Duong, H. T., Jonsson, H. H., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Black carbon aerosol over the Los Angeles Basin during CalNex, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D00V13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd017255" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd017255</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation> Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation> Miyakawa, T., Oshima, N., Taketani, F., Komazaki, Y., Yoshino, A., Takami, A., Kondo, Y., and Kanaya, Y.: Alteration of the size distributions and mixing states of black carbon through transport in the boundary layer in east Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5851–5864, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5851-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5851-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Moffet, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: In-situ measurements of the mixing state and optical properties of soot with implications for radiative forcing estimates, PNAS, 106, 11872–11877, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Molina, M. J., Ivanov, A. V., Trakhtenberg, S., and Molina, L. T.: Atmospheric evolution of organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L22104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020910" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020910</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Moorthy, K. K., Sunilkumar, S. V., Pillai, P. S., Parameswaran, K., Nair, P. R., Ahmed, Y. N., Ramgopal, K., Narasimhulu, K., Reddy, R. R., Vinoj, V., Satheesh, S. K., Niranjan, K., Rao, B. M., Brahmanandam, P. S., Saha, A., Badarinath, K. V. S., Kiranchand, T. R., and Latha, K. M.: Wintertime spatial characteristics of boundary layer aerosols over peninsular India, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D08207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005520" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005520</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Moorthy, K. K., Satheesh, S. K., Babu, S. S., and Dutt, C. B. S.: Integrated campaign for aerosols, gases, and radiation budget (ICARB): an overview, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 117, 243–262, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Moorthy, K. K., Satheesh, S. K., Sarin, M. M., and Panday, A. K.: South Asian aerosols in perspective: Preface to the special issue, Atmos. Environ., 125, 307–311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.073</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Moteki, N. and Kondo, Y.: Effects of mixing state on black carbon measurements by laser-induced incandescence, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 398–417, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Moteki, N. and Kondo, Y.: Dependence of laser-induced incandescence on physical properties of black carbon aerosols: Measurements and theoretical interpretation, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 663–675, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Moteki, N., Kondo, Y., Miyazaki, Y., Takegawa, N., Komazaki, Y., Kurata, G., Shirai, T., Blake, D., Miyakawa, T., and Koike, M.: Evolution of mixing state of black carbon particles: Aircraft measurements over the western Pacific in March 2004, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L11803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028943" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028943</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Moteki, N., Kondo, Y., and Nakamura, S.: Method to measure refractive indices of small nonspherical particles: Application to black carbon particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 41, 513–521, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation> Nair, V. S., Jayachandran, V. N., Kompalli, S. K., Gogoi, M. M., and Babu, S. S.: Cloud condensation nuclei properties of South Asian outflow over the northern Indian Ocean during winter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3135–3149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3135-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3135-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation> Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L., Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q. , Sun, Y. L., and Jayne, J. T.: An Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) for Routine Monitoring of the Composition and Mass Concentrations of Ambient Aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 780–794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation> Pagels, J., Khalizov, A. F., McMurry, P. H., and Zhang, R. Y.: Processing of Soot by Controlled Sulphuric Acid and Water Condensation Mass and Mobility Relationship, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 629–640, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820902810685" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820902810685</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation> Pandey, A., Sadavarte, P., Rao, A. B., and Venkataraman, C.: Trends in multi-pollutant emissions from a technology-linked inventory for India: II. Residential, agricultural and informal industry sectors, Atmos. Environ., 99, 341–352, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation> Park, K., Kittelson, D., Zachariah, M., and McMurry, P.: Measurement of Inherent Material Density of Nanoparticle Agglomerates, J. Nanopart. Res., 6, 267–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation> Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y.-S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C. R., Collins, D. R., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation> Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting ”black carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation> Prasad, P., Ramana, R., Venkat Ratnam, M., Chen, W., Vijaya Bhaskara Rao, S., Gogoi, M. M., Kompalli, S. K., Kumar, K. S., and Babu, S. S.: Characterization of atmospheric Black Carbon over a semi-urban site of Southeast India: Local sources and long-range transport, Atmos. Res., 213, 411–421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.06.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.06.024</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation> Ramanathan, V. and Carmichael, G.: Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon, Nat. Geosci., 1, 221–227, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Lelieveld, J., Mitra, A. P., Althausen, D., Anderson, J., Andreae, M. O., Cantrell, W., Cass, G. R., Chung, C. E., Clarke, A. D., Coakley, J. A., Collins, W. D., Conant, W. C., Dulac, F., Heintzenberg, J., Heymsfield, A. J., Holben, B., Howell, S., Hudson, J., Jayaraman, A., Kiehl, J. T., Krishnamurti, T. N., Lubin, D., McFarquhar, G., Novakov, T., Ogren, J. A., Podgorny, I. A., Prather, K., Priestley, K., Prospero, J. M., Quinn, P. K., Rajeev, K., Rasch, P., Rupert, S., Sadourny, R., Satheesh, S. K., Shaw, G. E., Sheridan, P., and Valero, F. P. J.: Indian Ocean Experiment: An integrated analysis of the climate forcing and effects of the greatIndo-Asian haze, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 28371–28398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900133" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900133</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation> Ramanathan, V., Chung, C., Kim, D., Bettge, T., Buja, L., Kiehl, J. T., Washington, W. M., Fu, Q., Sikka, D. R., and Wild, M.: Atmospheric brown clouds: Impacts on South Asian climate and hydrological cycle, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 5326–5333, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation> Raatikainen, T., Brus, D., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Svensson, J., Asmi, E., and Lihavainen, H.: Black carbon concentrations and mixing state in the Finnish Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10057–10070, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10057-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10057-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation> Raatikainen, T., Brus, D., Hooda, R. K., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Asmi, E., Sharma, V. P., Arola, A., and Lihavainen, H.: Size-selected black carbon mass distributions and mixing state in polluted and clean environments of northern India, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 371–383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-371-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-371-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation> Reddington, C. L., McMeeking, G., Mann, G. W., Coe, H., Frontoso, M. G., Liu, D., Flynn, M., Spracklen, D. V., and Carslaw, K. S.: The mass and number size distributions of black carbon aerosol over Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4917–4939, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4917-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4917-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation> Sahu, L. K., Kondo, Y., Moteki, N., Takegawa, N., Zhao, Y., Cubison, M. J., Jimenez, J. L., Vay, S., Diskin, G. S., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Huey, L. G., Weinheimer, A. J., and Knapp, D. J.: Emission characteristics of black carbon in anthropogenic and solid fuel burning plumes over California during ARCTAS-CARB 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D16302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017401" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017401</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation> Schnaiter, M., Linke, C., Möhler, O., Naumann, K. H., Saathoff, H., Wagner, R., Schurath, U., and Wehner, B.: Absorption amplification of black carbon internally mixed with secondary organic aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D19204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006046</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation> Schnitzler, E. G., Gac, J. M., and Jäger, W.: Coating surface tension dependence of soot aggregate restructuring, J. Aerosol Sci., 106, 43–55, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.01.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.01.005</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation> Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Spackman, J. R., Watts, L. A., Thomson, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Ryerson, T. B., Peischl, J., Holloway, J. S., Trainer, M., Frost, G. J., Baynard, T., Lack, D. A., de Gouw, J. A., Warneke, C., and Del Negro, L. A.: Measurement of the mixing state, mass, and optical size of individual black carbon particles in urban and biomass burning emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L13810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033968" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033968</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation> Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Perring, A. E., Spackman, J. R., and Fahey, D. W.: Black carbon aerosol size in snow, Sci. Rep., 3, 1356, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01356</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation> Sedlacek III, A. J., Lewis, E. R., Kleinman, L., Xu, J., and Zhang, Q. Determination of and evidence for noncore-shell structure of particles containing black carbon using the Single-Particle Soot Photometer (SP2), Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050905" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050905</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation> Sedlacek III, A. J., Onasch, T. B., Nichman, L., Lewis, E. R., Davidovits, P., Freedman, A., and Williams, L.: Formation of refractory black carbon by SP2-induced charring of organic aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 52, 1345–1350, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1531107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1531107</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation> Shank, L. M., Howell, S., Clarke, A. D., Freitag, S., Brekhovskikh, V., Kapustin, V., McNaughton, C., Campos, T., and Wood, R.: Organic matter and non-refractory aerosol over the remote Southeast Pacific: oceanic and combustion sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 557–576, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-557-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-557-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation> Sharma, S., Leaitch, W. R., Huang, L., Veber, D., Kolonjari, F., Zhang, W., Hanna, S. J., Bertram, A. K., and Ogren, J. A.: An evaluation of three methods for measuring black carbon in Alert, Canada, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 15225–15243, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15225-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15225-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Kondo, Y., Moteki, N., Takegawa, N., Miyazaki, Y., and Blake, D. R.: Evolution of mixing state of black carbon in polluted air from Tokyo, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L16803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029819" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029819</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation> Shiraiwa, M., Kondo, Y., Moteki, N., Takegawa, N., Sahu, L. K., Takami, A., Hatakeyama, S., Yonemura, S., and Blake, D. R.: Radiative impact of mixing state of black carbon aerosol in Asian outflow, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D24210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010546" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010546</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation> Shiraiwa, M., Kondo, Y., Iwamoto, T., and Kita, K.: Amplification of light absorption of black carbon by organic coating, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 46–54, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation> Slowik, J. G., Cross, E. S., Han, J.-H., Davidovits, P., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Williams, L. R., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmueller, H., Arnott, W. P., Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R.-S., Fahey, D. W., Kok, G. L., and Petzold, A.: An inter-comparison of instruments measuring black carbon content of soot particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 295–314, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701197078" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701197078</a>, 2007a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Slowik, J. G., Cross, E. S., Han, J.-H., Kolucki, J., Davidovits, P., Williams, L. R., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Measurements of morphology changes of fractal soot particles using coating and denuding experiments: Implications for optical absorption and atmospheric lifetime, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 734–750, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701432632" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701432632</a>, 2007b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation> Srinivas, B. and Sarin, M. M.: PM<sub>2.5</sub>, EC and OC in atmospheric outflow from the Indo-Gangetic Plain: Temporal variability and aerosol organic carbon-to-organic mass conversion factor, Sci. Total Environ., 487, 196–205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.002</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation> Srivastava, R. and Ramachandran, S.: The mixing state of aerosols over the Indo-Gangetic Plain and its impact on radiative forcing, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 137–151. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1958" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1958</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation> Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, H., Yang, T., Li, J., Pan, X., Chen, P., and Jayne, T. P.: Characterization of Summer Organic and Inorganic Aerosols in Beijing, China with an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor, Atmos. Environ., 51, 250–259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., Liu, D., Flynn, M., Weber, R., Zhang, X., Lefer, B. L., Grossberg, N., Flynn, J., and Coe, H.: Assessment of the sensitivity of core / shell parameters derived using the single-particle soot photometer to density and refractive index, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1701–1718, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1701-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1701-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation> Taylor, J. W., Wu, H., Szpek, K., Bower, K., Crawford, I., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I., Dorsey, J., Langridge, J. M., Cotterell, M. I., Fox, C., Davies, N. W., Haywood, J. M., and Coe, H.: Absorption closure in highly aged biomass burning smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11201–11221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation> Thamban, N. M., Tripathi, S. N., Shamjad P. M., Kuntamukkala, P., and Kanawade, V. P.: Internally mixed black carbon in the Indo-Gangetic Plain and its effect on absorption enhancement, Atmos. Res., 197, 211–223, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.07.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.07.007</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation> Ueda, S., Nakayama, T., Taketani, F., Adachi, K., Matsuki, A., Iwamoto, Y., Sadanaga, Y., and Matsumi, Y.: Light absorption and morphological properties of soot-containing aerosols observed at an East Asian outflow site, Noto Peninsula, Japan, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2525–2541, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2525-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2525-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation> Ueda, S., Osada, K., Hara, K., Yabuki, M., Hashihama, F., and Kanda, J.: Morphological features and mixing states of soot-containing particles in the marine boundary layer over the Indian and Southern oceans, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9207–9224, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9207-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9207-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation> Unger, N., Shindell, D. T., Koch, D. M., and Streets D. G.: Cross Influences of Ozone and Sulfate Precursor Emissions Changes on Air Quality and Climate, PNAS, 103, 4377–4380, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Liu, D., Ge, X., Wu, Y., Shen, F., Chen, M., Zhao, J., Xie, C., Wang, Q., Xu, W., Zhang, J., Hu, J., Allan, J., Joshi, R., Fu, P., Coe, H., and Sun, Y.: Characterization of black carbon-containing fine particles in Beijing during wintertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 447–458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-447-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-447-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Q., Cao, J., Han, Y., Tian, J., Zhu, C., Zhang, Y., Zhang, N., Shen, Z., Ni, H., Zhao, S., and Wu, J.: Sources and physicochemical characteristics of black carbon aerosol from the southeastern Tibetan Plateau: internal mixing enhances light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4639–4656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4639-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4639-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation> Weingartner, E., Burtscher, H., and Baltensperger, U.: Growth and structural change of combustion aerosols at high relative humidity, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29, 2982–2986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00012a014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es00012a014</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation> Wiedensohler, A.: An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range, J. Aerosol Sci., 19, 387–389, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation> Xu, W., Croteau, P., Williams, L., Canagaratna, M., Onasch, T., Cross, E., Zhang, X., Robinson, W., Worsnop, D., and Jayne, J.: Laboratory characterization of an aerosol chemical speciation monitor with PM<sub>2.5</sub> measurement capability, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 51, 69–83, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1241859" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1241859</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation> Xue, H. X., Khalizov, A. F., Wang, L., Zheng, J., and Zhang, R. Y.: Effects of Coating of Dicarboxylic Acids on the Mass-Mobility Relationship of Soot Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2787–2792, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803287v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es803287v</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation> Zanatta, M., Laj, P., Gysel, M., Baltensperger, U., Vratolis, S., Eleftheriadis, K., Kondo, Y., Dubuisson, P., Winiarek, V., Kazadzis, S., Tunved, P., and Jacobi, H.-W.: Effects of mixing state on optical and radiative properties of black carbon in the European Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14037–14057, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14037-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14037-2018</a>, 2018.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation> Zhang, J., Liu, J., Tao, S., and Ban-Weiss, G. A.: Long-range transport of black carbon to the Pacific Ocean and its dependence on aging timescale, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11521–11535, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11521-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11521-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Khalizov, A. F., Pagels, J., Zhang, D., Xue, H., and McMurry, P. H.: Variability in morphology, hygroscopicity, and optical properties of soot aerosols during atmospheric processing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 10291–10296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804860105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804860105</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation> Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., Cheng, Y., Su, H., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., Wu, Z., Hu, M., Zhu, T., Wiedensohler, A., and He, K.: Measuring the morphology and density of internally mixed black carbon with SP2 and VTDMA: new insight into the absorption enhancement of black carbon in the atmosphere, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1833–1843, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1833-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1833-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation> Zorn, S. R., Drewnick, F., Schott, M., Hoffmann, T., and Borrmann, S.: Characterization of the South Atlantic marine boundary layer aerosol using an aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4711–4728, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4711-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4711-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
