<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-8961-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Measurement report: Molecular composition and volatility of gaseous organic compounds in a boreal forest – from volatile organic compounds to highly oxygenated organic molecules</article-title><alt-title>Gaseous organic compounds in a boreal forest: from VOCs to HOMs​​​​​​​</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Gaseous organic compounds in a boreal forest: from VOCs to HOMs​​​​​​​}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{W. Huang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
          <email>wei.huang@helsinki.fi</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-2117</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Haiyan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4750-7477</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sarnela</surname><given-names>Nina</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1874-3235</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Heikkinen</surname><given-names>Liine</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7837-967X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tham</surname><given-names>Yee Jun</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7924-5841</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Mikkilä</surname><given-names>Jyri</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Thomas</surname><given-names>Steven J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7129-9773</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Donahue</surname><given-names>Neil M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3054-2364</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kulmala</surname><given-names>Markku</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-7825</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bianchi</surname><given-names>Federico</given-names></name>
          <email>federico.bianchi@helsinki.fi</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-3604</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00014, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of
Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Karsa Oy., A. I. Virtasen aukio 1, Helsinki, 00560, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA</institution>
        </aff><author-comment content-type="econtrib"><p>These authors contributed equally to this work.</p></author-comment>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Wei Huang (wei.huang@helsinki.fi) and Federico Bianchi (federico.bianchi@helsinki.fi)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>14</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>8961</fpage><lpage>8977</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>23</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e190">The molecular composition and volatility of gaseous organic
compounds were investigated during April–July 2019 at the Station for
Measuring Ecosystem – Atmosphere Relations (SMEAR) II situated in a boreal
forest in Hyytiälä, southern Finland. In order to obtain a more
complete picture and full understanding of the molecular composition and
volatility of ambient gaseous organic compounds (from volatile organic
compounds, VOCs, to highly oxygenated organic molecules, HOMs), two
different instruments were used. A Vocus proton-transfer-reaction
time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Vocus PTR-ToF; hereafter Vocus) was
deployed to measure VOCs and less oxygenated VOCs (i.e., OVOCs). In
addition, a multi-scheme chemical ionization inlet coupled to an atmospheric
pressure interface time-of-flight mass spectrometer (MION API-ToF) was used
to detect less oxygenated VOCs (using Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as the reagent ion; hereafter
MION-Br) and more oxygenated VOCs (including HOMs; using NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
the reagent ion; hereafter MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The comparison among different
measurement techniques revealed that the highest elemental oxygen-to-carbon
ratios (O : C) of organic compounds were observed by the MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1, average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard deviation), followed by the MION-Br
(0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1); lowest O : C ratios were observed by Vocus (0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1). Diurnal patterns
of the measured organic compounds were found to vary among different
measurement techniques, even for compounds with the same molecular formula,
suggesting contributions of different isomers detected by the different
techniques and/or fragmentation from different parent compounds inside the
instruments. Based on the complementary molecular information obtained from
Vocus, MION-Br, and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, a more complete picture of the bulk
volatility of all measured organic compounds in this boreal forest was
obtained. As expected, the VOC class was the most abundant (about 53.2 %), followed by intermediate-volatility organic compounds (IVOCs, about
45.9 %). Although condensable organic compounds (low-volatility organic
compounds, LVOCs; extremely low volatility organic compounds, ELVOCs; and
ultralow-volatility organic compounds, ULVOCs) only comprised about 0.2 %
of the total gaseous organic compounds, they play an important role in new
particle formation as shown in previous studies in this boreal forest. Our
study shows the full characterization of the gaseous organic compounds in
the boreal forest and the advantages of combining Vocus and MION API-ToF for
measuring ambient organic compounds with different oxidation extents (from
VOCs to HOMs). The results therefore provide a more comprehensive
understanding of the molecular composition and volatility of atmospheric
organic compounds as well as new insights into interpreting ambient
measurements<?pagebreak page8962?> or testing/improving parameterizations in transport and climate
models.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e279">Organic aerosol (OA) has significant impacts on climate (IPCC, 2013), air
quality (Boers et al., 2015), and human health (Nel,
2005; Rückerl et al., 2011). Large amounts of biogenic and anthropogenic
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are emitted into the atmosphere
(Atkinson and Arey, 2003), with biogenic VOC (BVOC) emissions
greatly surpassing anthropogenic VOC emissions globally (Heald et al.,
2008). The global BVOC emissions are dominated by terpenes (isoprene
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), 594 Tg C a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; monoterpenes (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), 95 Tg C a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; and sesquiterpenes (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), 20 Tg C a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Sindelarova et al., 2014), which are mainly emitted by vegetation and
can be influenced by meteorological conditions, such as temperature and
light (Guenther et al., 1995; Kaser et al., 2013). After being emitted, they
can undergo gas-phase oxidation with ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), hydroxyl radical (OH),
or nitrate radical (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), forming thousands of oxygenated VOCs (i.e.,
OVOCs) with diverse functionalities that can be grouped into different
volatility classes: intermediate-volatility (IVOC), semi-volatile (SVOC),
low-volatility (LVOC), extremely low volatility (ELVOC), and
ultralow-volatility (ULVOC) organic compounds. Organic compounds with sufficiently low
volatility (e.g., LVOCs, ELVOCs, and ULVOCs) can either form new particles or
partition into the particle phase, contributing to particulate growth and
mass (Ehn et al., 2014; Bianchi et al., 2016, 2019; Simon et
al., 2020; Schervish and Donahue, 2020; Kulmala et al., 2013). Recent studies
have shown that highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs; Bianchi et
al., 2019) are a major source of condensing or nucleating compounds, and they
play an important role in atmospheric new particle formation (Ehn et al.,
2014; Bianchi et al., 2016; Kirkby et al., 2016; Tröstl et al.,
2016; Bianchi et al., 2019; Kulmala et al., 1998). However, as a result of the
complexity and analytical challenges of the precursor VOCs as well as the
chemical composition and physicochemical properties of the resulting
oxidation products (i.e., OVOCs), accurately predicting their effects on air
quality and climate is still limited.</p>
      <p id="d1e391">Mass spectrometric techniques represent one general approach to investigate
the chemical composition of organic compounds (Sullivan and Prather,
2005; Nash et al., 2006). One common ionization technique used in aerosol
research is chemical ionization (CI; e.g., Caldwell et al., 1989; Ehn et
al., 2014; Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2019a). It is a soft
ionization method (Gross, 2017) that utilizes the reactivity of the
analyte towards the reagent ion to ionize molecules via transfer of an
electron, proton, or other ions such as bromide and nitrate (Caldwell et
al., 1989; Ehn et al., 2014; Sanchez et al., 2016; Yuan et al., 2017; Krechmer
et al., 2018). Different chemical ionization mass spectrometers (CIMSs) have
different capabilities and sensitivities for detecting organic compounds
(Riva et al., 2019). Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS)
has been widely used to measure VOCs in the atmosphere (Yuan et al.,
2017). The recently developed Vocus PTR time-of-flight mass spectrometer
(Vocus PTR-ToF) has greatly enhanced sensitivity due to a newly designed
chemical ionization source (Krechmer et al., 2018), and it can detect a
broader spectrum of VOCs (even diterpenes) and their oxygenated products
(up to six to eight oxygen atoms for monoterpene oxidation products; Li et al.,
2020). However, Vocus PTR-ToF is not preferred for detecting HOMs or dimers
(Li et al., 2020; Riva et al., 2019). The potential reason for the latter
case could result from the fragmentation inside the instrument
(Heinritzi et al., 2016) and/or losses in the sampling lines
and on the walls of the inlet (Riva et al., 2019). The detection of less
oxygenated VOCs (including less oxygenated dimers) and more oxygenated VOCs
(including HOMs) can be well achieved by another instrument: an atmospheric
pressure interface time-of-flight mass spectrometer (API-ToF) coupled to a
novel chemical ionization inlet, Multi-scheme chemical IONization inlet
(MION; Rissanen et al., 2019). Via the fast switching between multiple
reagent ion schemes (i.e., bromide and nitrate), it has been found that MION
API-ToF is able to provide a more complete picture of the OVOCs for
laboratory experiments performed in flow tube reactors (Rissanen et al.,
2019). Br-CIMS has been found to have similar or even higher sensitivities
than that of iodide-CIMS towards OVOCs depending on humidity (Hyttinen et
al., 2018). It has also been used for the detection of hydroperoxyl radicals
(Sanchez et al., 2016) and peroxy radicals formed by autoxidation (Rissanen
et al., 2019). In addition to the molecular composition of organic compounds
itself provided by the abovementioned state-of-the-art instruments (i.e.,
Vocus PTR-ToF and MION API-ToF), this information can also be used in
volatility parameterizations to calculate effective saturation mass
concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of individual organic compounds (Li et al.,
2016; Donahue et al., 2011; Mohr et al., 2019), which can be then grouped into
different volatility classes (or bins), i.e., volatility basis sets (VBSs;
e.g., Donahue et al., 2006, 2011, 2012; Cappa and Jimenez, 2010). However, due
to the different instrumental capabilities and sensitivities as well as the
lack of calibration standards for the majority of organic compounds for the
different measurement techniques as abovementioned, it still remains
challenging to provide a comprehensive understanding of the molecular
composition and volatility of both VOCs and OVOCs, particularly in the
field.</p>
      <p id="d1e405">In the present work, we investigate the chemical composition and volatility
of gaseous organic compounds (VOCs and OVOCs) measured during April and July
2019 in a boreal forest in Hyytiälä, southern Finland. The
capabilities of the recently developed MION API-ToF for measuring<?pagebreak page8963?> ambient
OVOCs are reported for the first time. Besides, the molecular composition
and volatility of the OVOCs measured by MION API-ToF are compared and
complemented with those OVOCs and their precursor VOCs observed with Vocus
PTR-ToF. With the combination of the organic compounds measured by both
instruments, we present a more comprehensive picture of the molecular
composition and volatility of the gaseous organic compounds in this boreal
forest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Site description</title>
      <p id="d1e423">The measurements were conducted between 16 April–26 July 2019 at the
University of Helsinki Station for Measuring Ecosystem – Atmosphere
Relations (SMEAR) II (Hari and Kulmala, 2005), which is located in a boreal
forest in Hyytiälä, southern Finland (61<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 181 m a.s.l.). This station is dominated by
Scots pine (<italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic>), and monoterpenes are found to be the dominating emitted
biogenic non-methane VOCs (Barreira et al., 2017; Hakola et al., 2012).
The measurement station has been considered a rural background site
(Manninen et al., 2010; Williams et al., 2011), and the nearest big city
is Tampere, with more than 200 000 inhabitants and located
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 km to the SW of our measurement site. A sawmill which is located 6–7 km
away to the SE of our measurement site can contribute significantly to the
OA loading in the case of SE winds, and the sawmill OA composition has been
found to resemble biogenic OA a lot (Liao et al., 2011; Äijälä
et al., 2017; Heikkinen et al., 2020).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Measurements, quantification, and volatility calculation of gaseous organic compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e481">All mass spectrometers were set up in a temperature-controlled measurement
container kept at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Sampling inlets were located
about 1.5 m a.g.l. All data are reported in eastern European time (UTC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Measurements and quantification of gaseous organic compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e514">An API-ToF (Tofwerk Ltd.; equipped with a long ToF with a mass resolving
power of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9000) coupled to a recently developed multi-scheme chemical
ionization inlet (MION, Karsa Ltd.; Rissanen et al., 2019) was used to
analyze the molecular composition of OVOCs at a time resolution of 30 min.
During the 30 min cycles of measurements, MION API-ToF switched modes among
nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 8 min), bromide (Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 8 min), and API
(measuring natural ions, 10 min) modes, followed by 2 min of ion-filter
zeroing for the API mode before switching from API mode to the next mode.
More details about the instrument are well described by Rissanen et al. (2019). Gaseous organic compounds were sampled via a stainless-steel tube
(1 in. outer diameter) of ca. 0.9 m length and a flow rate of 20 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Due to the large inlet diameter and flow rate, the SVOC and HOM
losses are expected to be insignificant. Through the fast switching between
the two reagent ion schemes, Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, less oxygenated
VOCs (including less oxygenated dimers) and more oxygenated VOCs (including
HOMs) can be measured, respectively (Rissanen et al., 2019). Data were
analyzed with the software packages, “tofTools” (developed by Junninen et
al., 2010) and “Labbis” (developed by Karsa Ltd.), which run in the
MATLAB environment (MathWorks Inc., USA). Hereafter, results from these two
reagent ion schemes are abbreviated as MION-Br and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
quantification of gaseous organic compounds measured with MION-Br and
MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated as in Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M38" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Br</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Br</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Br</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Br</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where [org] is the concentration (unit: cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the gaseous organic
compound (obtained from high-resolution fitting of each nominal mass) to be
quantified; the numerators on the right-hand side are its detected signal
clustered with bromide or nitrate, and the denominators are the sum of the
reagent ion signals; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Br</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the calibration factors
representing the sensitivity of organic compound. The two stable isotopes of
bromide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) share similar relative
isotopic abundance, but only the compound clustered with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was
used for the quantification (Sanchez et al., 2016), as the calibration
factor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Br</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was also calculated in a similar way. Following the
approach by Rissanen et al. (2019), the calibration factors
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Br</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
sulfuric acid (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, compound representing the kinetic limit
sensitivity; Viggiano et al., 1997; Berresheim et al., 2000) were determined
to be 2.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 4.68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The calibration factors are higher than those
reported by Rissanen et al. (2019) due to different instrumental settings
and inlet setup. By comparing the ambient H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
measured by MION-Br and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the median value (0.53) was used to
scale down the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration measured by MION-Br, due to
the fact that the high water vapor concentrations in the calibration kit
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) might cause some
uncertainties in the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration factor of MION-Br (Hyttinen
et al., 2018; Kürten et al., 2012). However, the MION-Br sensitivity has
been found to be invariant with the measured ambient RH at our measurement
site (20 %–100 %), e.g., for hydroperoxyl radicals (Sanchez et al., 2016),
and the water clustered with Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> has also been included in the signal
normalization of organic compounds to account for the humidity<?pagebreak page8964?> effect on
reagent ion competition (see Eq. 1). With the maximum sensitivity
applied, the concentrations therefore represent a lower limit. The
uncertainties in the measured organic compound concentrations using
calibration factors for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> have been reported to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 % (Ehn et al., 2014) or a factor of 2 (Berndt et al., 2015).
However, the uncertainties could be higher with variations in, for example,
temperature and relative humidity (RH) in the field.</p>
      <p id="d1e1092">A Vocus PTR-ToF (Aerodyne Research Inc.; hereafter Vocus) was deployed to
measure VOCs and less oxygenated VOCs at a time resolution of 5 s. During
the measurements, the Vocus ionization source was operated at a pressure of
1.5 mbar. The ambient air was sampled via a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)
tube of ca. 1 m length and a total sample flow of 4.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Of the
total sample flow, around 100–150 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> went into the Vocus
and the remainder was directed to the exhaust. The Vocus was automatically
calibrated every 3 h using a multi-component standard cylinder. The
standard gases were diluted by the injection of zero air with a built-in
active carbon filter, producing the VOCs mixing ratio of around 5 ppb. The
sensitivity of VOCs measured by PTR instruments has been shown to relate to
their elemental composition and functionality (Sekimoto et al., 2017).
Some compounds were calibrated using authentic standards, including
isoprene, monoterpenes, and some aromatic compounds. Compounds without
authentic standards were divided into four different molecular groups, the
CH (compounds with only carbon and hydrogen atoms), CHO (compounds with only
carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen atoms), CHON (compounds with only carbon,
hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen atoms), and others. Compounds with the
formula of CH and CHO were quantified with the average sensitivities of the
standards CH and CHO, respectively. For the groups of CHON and others, there
was no standard available in the calibration mixture. We used the average
sensitivity of all the CH and CHO standards to quantify CHON compounds and
others. Quantification using the relationship between the kinetic reaction
rate constants and calibrated sensitivity (Sekimoto et al., 2017; Yuan et
al., 2017) did not show huge differences (slopes between 0.59–0.75; see
Fig. S1 in the Supplement) for the concentrations of several CH species (e.g.,
sesquiterpenes and diterpenes) or several dominant CHO and CHON species
(e.g., C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to the abovementioned quantification
method we used. The Vocus data analysis was performed using the software
package “Tofware” (provided by Tofwerk Ltd.) that runs in the Igor Pro
environment (WaveMetrics Inc., USA). Signals were pre-averaged over 30 min
before the analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e1216">When combining the organic compounds measured by the three different
ionization techniques (i.e., MION-Br, MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Vocus), for organic
compounds observed in all ionization techniques, the highest concentration
was used. Background subtraction was performed for all spectra; therefore,
a lower signal for the same compound detected by any of the ionization
techniques suggests a lower ionization efficiency of the corresponding
method (Stolzenburg et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Volatility calculation of gaseous organic compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e1236">Effective saturation mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a measure for
volatility of a compound, was parameterized for each organic compound using
the approach by Li et al. (2016) as in Eq. (3):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the number of carbon, oxygen,
nitrogen, and sulfur atoms in the organic compound, respectively;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference carbon number; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the contribution of each atom to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the carbon–oxygen nonideality
(Donahue et al., 2011). These “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” values depend on the
composition of precursor gases, such as whether the precursors
are aliphatic (including terpenes) or aromatic. In addition to being derived
from literature structure–activity relations (i.e., SIMPOL;
Pankow and Asher, 2008), the relations have been quantitatively confirmed
for both aliphatic and aromatic systems using filter inlet for gases and
aerosols (FIGAERO) thermal desorption CIMS measurements on carefully
controlled precursor oxidation experiments at the CLOUD (Cosmics Leaving
Outdoor Droplets) facility at CERN (European Organization for Nuclear
Research) (Ye et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020). For the boreal forest
conditions in this work, we use the aliphatic (more volatile)
parameterization, and these “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” values can be found in Li et al. (2016). Due to the fact that the empirical approach by Li et al. (2016) was
derived with very few organonitrates and could therefore lead to bias for
the estimated vapor pressure (Isaacman-VanWertz and Aumont, 2021), we
modified the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (298 K) of CHON compounds by replacing all NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
groups with OH groups (Daumit et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e1544">To obtain the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), we adjusted the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (298 K) (Donahue et
al., 2011; Epstein et al., 2010) to the measured ambient temperature as in
Eqs. (4) and (5):

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M106" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">129</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the temperature in kelvin; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (298 K) is the saturation mass
concentration at 298 K; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
vaporization enthalpy; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas constant (8.3143 J K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <?pagebreak page8965?><p id="d1e1794"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Uncertainties arising from the potential presence of isomers is limited
within this dataset, since they cannot be differentiated using the
formula-based parameterization with the only input being the molecular
composition. Accuracy to within 1 order of magnitude for terpene oxidation
products has been confirmed by calibrated thermal desorption measurement
(Wang et al., 2020) and by closure with size-resolved growth rate
measurements at the CLOUD experiment (Stolzenburg et al., 2018). Besides,
the fragmentation of organic compounds inside the instruments (e.g., Vocus)
may also bias the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results towards higher volatilities, resulting
from the signal bias of parent ions towards lower values and of fragment
ions towards higher values (Heinritzi et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Additional co-located measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1818">The meteorological parameters were continuously monitored at this
measurement site. Temperature was monitored with a Pt100 sensor (platinum
resistance thermometer with a resistance of 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) inside a ventilated custom-made radiation shield, while wind
directions and wind speed were measured with a 2D ultrasonic anemometer (Adolf Thies GmbH
&amp; Co. KG), and the global radiation was measured with an EQ08 pyranometer
(Carter-Scott Manufacturing Pty. Ltd.). The main wind direction above the
canopy during the measurement period was southwest (see Fig. S2). The
mixing ratios of ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nitrogen oxides (NO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) were
measured with an ultraviolet light absorption analyzer (TEI 49C, Thermo
Fisher Scientific Inc.) and a chemiluminescence analyzer (TEI 42CTL, Thermo
Fisher Scientific Inc.), respectively. The mixing ratios of sulfur dioxide
(SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) were measured with a fluorescence analyzer (TEI 43CTL, Thermo
Fisher Scientific Inc.).</p>
      <p id="d1e1864">An aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM; Aerodyne Research Inc.; Ng
et al., 2011) was deployed to continuously measure the non-refractory
sub-micrometer aerosol particle chemical composition. The ACSM, which
contains a quadrupole mass spectrometer, provided unit-mass-resolution mass
spectra every 30 min. This information was chemically speciated to organic,
sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and chloride concentrations by the ACSM analysis
software. The mass concentrations of each species were calculated based on
frequently conducted ionization efficiency calibrations. The data were
corrected for collection efficiency, which was ca. 60 % during the
measurement period. The sampling was conducted through a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cyclone
and a Nafion dryer (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 %) with a stainless-steel tube of ca.
3 m length and a flow rate of 3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (only 1.4 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
into the ACSM). The recorded data were analyzed using the ACSM local
v. 1.6.0.3 toolkit (provided by Aerodyne Research Inc.) within the Igor Pro
v. 6.37 (WaveMetrics Inc., USA). More details about ACSM operation and data
processing can be found in Heikkinen et al. (2020).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Overview of the measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1933">Figure 1 shows the overview of the time series of meteorological parameters
(temperature, global radiation, and wind direction and wind speed), trace
gas concentrations (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and total
gaseous organic compounds measured by MION-Br, MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Vocus, as
well as total particulate organics measured by ACSM. Note that relatively
long-lived compounds like ethanol, acetone, and acetic acid are excluded
from Vocus data presented in this study in order to focus on compounds
actively involved in the fast photochemistry (all excluded compounds are
listed in Table S1, and the time series of total organic compound
concentrations including them are shown in Fig. S3). As we can see from
Fig. 1a, most of the measurement days had strong photochemical activities
with ambient temperature exhibiting clear diurnal patterns ranging between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 and 32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. In general, the time series of the total organics
(both gas phase and particle phase; see Fig. 1e–f) measured by MION-Br,
MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Vocus, and ACSM were similar during the measurement period.
Elevated levels of total gaseous and particulate organics (e.g., 17–24 May
and 7–10 June; see Fig. 1e–f) were observed on warmer days with strong
global radiation and with the main wind direction coming from southeast (the
direction of the sawmill, e.g., 17–24 May) or southwest (e.g., 7–10 June; see Fig. 1a–b). Besides, higher concentrations of oxidants of VOCs
(such as O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and/or anthropogenic pollutants (such as SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) also followed some of the elevated concentrations of gaseous
and/or particulate organics (e.g., 19 April–3 May, 17–24 May, and 7–10 June; see Fig. 1c–d). The observations of the elevated organics could result from higher VOC emissions (e.g.,
terpenes, the typically observed VOCs; Li et al., 2021; Fig. S3)
influenced by meteorological conditions (i.e., temperature and/or light;
Guenther et al., 1995; Kaser et al., 2013), different air mass origins
(e.g., terpene pollution from the sawmill in the case of SE winds; Liao
et al., 2011; Äijälä et al., 2017; Heikkinen et al., 2020), and chemistry initiated by or related with different trace gases (Yan et
al., 2016; Massoli et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2019b; Heikkinen et al., 2020).
The results suggest the important roles that meteorological parameters, trace
gases, and air masses play in the emission and oxidation reactions of
organic compounds. Due to the soft ionization processes of organic molecules
in the Vocus, MION-Br, and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the molecular composition of organic
compounds was obtained. In the next section we will discuss the molecular
composition of the gaseous organic compounds measured by Vocus, MION-Br, and
MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2046">Overview of the time series from 16 April to 26 July 2019. <bold>(a)</bold> Temperature and global radiation; <bold>(b)</bold> wind direction and wind speed; <bold>(c)</bold> mixing ratios of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(d)</bold> mixing ratios of NO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<bold>(e)</bold> total gaseous organics measured by MION-Br and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; and <bold>(f)</bold> total gaseous organics measured by Vocus as well as total particulate
organics measured by ACSM. The data gap between MION-Br and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(e.g., around 17 May) was due to the fact that the MION API-ToF was only running with
API mode and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mode because of a mass flow controller issue for Br
mode at that time.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/8961/2021/acp-21-8961-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page8966?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Molecular composition of gaseous organic compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e2139">During the measurement period, Vocus identified 72 CH compounds (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 431 CHOX compounds (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being different atoms like N, S, or a combination
thereof, while MION-Br and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> detected 567 and 687 CHOX
compounds, respectively. Substantial overlaps of organic compounds were
observed for these three ionization techniques, while distinct organic
compounds were also detected with individual methods (Fig. S4). The average
mass-weighted chemical compositions for organic compounds measured by Vocus,
MION-Br, and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. We stress here that the
fragmentation of organic compounds inside the Vocus may bias the chemical
composition towards a shorter carbon backbone. And the average mass-weighted
chemical composition representing the bulk of all measured gaseous organic
compounds (with the approach described in Sect. 2.2.1) in this boreal
forest was calculated to be C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicative
of the short carbon backbone and relatively low oxidation extent. Similar to
previous laboratory results (Riva et al., 2019), MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observed
the most oxidized compounds with the highest elemental oxygen-to-carbon
ratios (O : C; 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1, average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard deviation),
followed by the MION-Br (0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1); the O : C ratios of the organics detected
by Vocus were lowest (0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1). In addition, the CHO group comprised the
largest fraction of the total organic compounds (Vocus: 43.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.4 %; MION-Br: 75.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.3 %; MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: 71.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.9 %;
see Table 1). The second most abundant group for Vocus was the CH group, making
up 35.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.1 % of its total organic compounds; while it was the CHON
group for MION-Br (24.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.2 %) and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (28.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.9 %; see Table 1), indicating active NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical-related chemistry (Yan et al., 2016). The CHON group only accounted for 8.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7 % of the total organic compounds measured by Vocus, possibly
due to its lower sensitivity towards larger organonitrates (see also Fig. S5) caused by their losses in the sampling lines and on the walls of the
inlet (Riva et al., 2019) and/or fragmentation inside the instrument
(Heinritzi et al., 2016).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2523">Contribution (%, average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard deviation) of
different compound groups to total organics measured by different
measurement techniques.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Compound</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Vocus</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MION-Br</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">group</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.1 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.4 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.9 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CHON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.9 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Others</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2720"><bold>(a)</bold> Mass defect plots for organic compounds measured by Vocus, MION-Br, and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(b)</bold> mass defect plots for organic compounds (separated into CH, CHO, CHON, and others) measured by Vocus, MION-Br, and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Markers in panel <bold>(b)</bold> were all sized by the logarithm of their
corresponding concentrations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/8961/2021/acp-21-8961-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2756">The mass defect plots for organic compounds measured by Vocus, MION-Br, and
MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. 2. Similar to previous studies (e.g.,
Yan et al., 2016; Li et al., 2021), multiple series of organic compounds
with different numbers of carbon atoms (such as C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and<?pagebreak page8967?> oxygen atoms (up to 20; see also Fig. S5) were measured in
this boreal forest environment. Organics with the lowest oxidation extent
were better observed by Vocus, while organics with the largest molecular
weights and highest oxidation extent were better observed by MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 2a). Figure 2b shows the mass defect plots of organic compounds
grouped into different categories. The markers are color-coded with
different compound groups, such as CH, CHO, CHON, and others. The size of
the markers is proportional to the logarithm of the concentration of each
compound. Generally, similar to previous laboratory results (Riva et al.,
2019; Rissanen et al., 2019), Vocus and MION-Br detected better the CHO
compounds in the mass range of 50–100 Da and CHON compounds in the mass
range of 50–150 Da, and MION-Br even detected better the CHON compounds in the mass range of
350–425 Da, which are most likely to be less oxygenated monomers or dimers; MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was more sensitive towards the CHO and CHON compounds in
the mass range of 425–600 Da, which are most likely to be more oxygenated
HOM dimers (see Figs. 2b and S5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2825">Contribution of measured CHOX compounds with different numbers of
oxygen atoms to total CHOX compounds as a function of the number of carbon
atoms for Vocus <bold>(a)</bold>, MION-Br <bold>(b)</bold>, and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold>. Vocus panel has excluded CHX compounds (i.e., O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compounds).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/8961/2021/acp-21-8961-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2861">We further investigated the contributions of the measured CHOX compounds
with different numbers of oxygen atoms per molecule to total CHOX compounds
as a function of the number of carbon atoms (Fig. 3). Organic compounds
which were detected with higher sensitivity by Vocus were those with the
number of carbon atoms between 3 and 10 and the number of oxygen atoms
between 1 and 3 (i.e., less<?pagebreak page8968?> oxygenated monomers). Compounds with a larger
number of carbon atoms (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10) and oxygen atoms (i.e.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3) were much better detected by MION-Br and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: the
former particularly for CHON compounds with the number of carbon atoms
between 15 and 20 and oxygen atoms between 4 and 8 (i.e., larger less
oxygenated monomers and dimers; see Fig. S5b) and the latter particularly
for compounds with the number of oxygen atoms larger than 9 (i.e., HOM
monomers and dimers; Rissanen et al., 2019; Riva et al., 2019; Li et al.,
2020; see Figs. 3 and S5). In the MION-Br and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data, CHOX
compounds with the number of carbon atoms of 5, 10, 15, and even 20
exhibited relatively elevated contributions compared to their neighbors
(Fig. 3), indicating contributions of their potential corresponding
precursors, i.e., isoprene, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and diterpenes
(together accounting for 38.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.5 % of total CH compounds; see
Table S2, Figs. S3, and S6). We emphasize here that using the number of
carbon atoms as a basis to relate the CHOX to their precursor VOCs is a
simplified assumption, as negative or positive artifacts can arise from
fragmentation or accretion reactions (Lee et al., 2016). A similar pattern was
also observed by Huang et al. (2019a) in a rural
area in southwest Germany, based on filter inlet for gases and aerosols
high-resolution time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometer
(FIGAERO-HR-ToF-CIMS) data. The consistency and complement of the results
demonstrate the different capabilities of these instruments for measuring
gaseous organic compounds with different oxidation extents (from VOCs to
HOMs).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Diurnal characteristics of gaseous organic compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e2911">Median diurnal variations of total CH, total CHO, and total CHON compounds
measured by Vocus, MION-Br, and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. 4. In
general, the CH and CHO groups measured by Vocus exhibited higher levels
during the night (see Fig. 4a–b), mainly driven by the boundary layer
height dynamics (Baumbach and Vogt, 2003; Zha et al., 2018). Besides, CHO
compounds measured by Vocus were dominated by O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compounds (see Figs. 3 and S5) and have also been reported to follow more the CH trends
(Li et al., 2020). Their relatively flat diurnal pattern<?pagebreak page8969?> could
result from the smearing effect after summing up the much less oxygenated
CHO molecules (mostly peaking at night) and comparatively more oxygenated CHO
molecules (mostly peaking during daytime) (Li et al., 2020). In contrast, the
CHO and CHON groups measured by MION-Br and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited higher
levels during the day (see Fig. 4b), due to strong photochemical oxidation
caused by different meteorological parameters (i.e., temperature and global
radiation; see Figs. 1a and S7), and/or elevated trace gas levels
(e.g., O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Figs. 1c and S7; Yan et al.,
2016; Massoli et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2019b; Bianchi et al., 2017).
However, the CHON group measured by Vocus showed relatively stable signals
throughout the day (see Fig. 4c). The potential reason could be partly due
to its lower sensitivity towards larger organonitrates (see Fig. S5) caused
by their losses in the sampling lines and on the walls of the inlet (Riva et
al., 2019) and/or their fragmentation inside the instrument (Heinritzi et
al., 2016). Another potential reason could result from the smearing
effect after summing up the much less oxygenated CHON molecules (mostly peaking
at night or early morning) and comparatively more oxygenated CHON molecules
(mostly peaking during daytime) (Li et al., 2020).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2966">The median diurnal patterns of the total CH compounds measured by
Vocus <bold>(a)</bold>, CHO <bold>(b)</bold>, and CHON compounds <bold>(c)</bold> measured by Vocus, MION-Br, and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the whole measurement period. Signals were normalized to their maximum values.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/8961/2021/acp-21-8961-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2995">The median diurnal patterns of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold>,
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold>, and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(d)</bold> measured by Vocus, MION-Br, and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the whole measurement period. Signals were normalized to their maximum values.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=449.553543pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/8961/2021/acp-21-8961-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3136">Different diurnal patterns among different measurement techniques can also
be found for individual organic compounds with the same molecular formula,
such as several dominant CHO and CHON species, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(molecular formula corresponding to 3,6-oxoheptanoic acid identified in
the laboratory as limonene oxidation product by Faxon et al., 2018, and Hammes et
al., 2019), C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (molecular formula corresponding to
terpenylic acid identified in monoterpene oxidation product by Zhang et al.,
2015, and Hammes et al., 2019), and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (identified in
the laboratory as monoterpene oxidation products by Boyd et al., 2015, and Faxon
et al., 2018; see Fig. 5). The inconsistent trends in time series and the
varying correlations of these abovementioned dominant CHO and CHON species
indicate different isomer contributions detected by different measurement
techniques (Fig. S8 and Table S3). Similar behaviors were also evident for
OVOCs with varying oxidation extents, like the terpene-related C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>HO and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>HON compounds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 10, 15, and 20; see Fig. S9), which in
total accounted for up to 27 % and 39 % of their corresponding CHO and
CHON groups (see Table S2). Most of the terpene-related C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>HO(N) groups
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 10, 15, and 20) with different oxidation extents behaved similarly
among different measurement techniques, but some were also found to vary
(see Fig. S9). Compounds with the same number of carbon and oxygen atoms but
different numbers of hydrogen atoms (i.e., different saturation level) were also found
to behave differently (see Fig. S9c–d), possibly due to different chemistry
involved in their formation (Zhao et al., 2018; Molteni et al., 2019). Even
compounds with the same molecular formula varied among different measurement
techniques (see Fig. S9c–d and also Fig. 5). The differences can likely
result from different isomers detected by the different techniques and/or
fragmentation products from different parent compounds inside the
instruments (e.g., Heinritzi et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e3278">The results indicate that organic compounds may behave differently among
different measurement techniques during different time periods. In the next
section, we will investigate the volatility of these gaseous organic
compounds, which can influence their lifetime and roles in the atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Volatility of organic compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e3289">Based on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of all organic compounds
parameterized with the modified Li et al. (2016) approach (Daumit et
al., 2013; Isaacman-VanWertz and Aumont, 2021) described in Sect. 2.2.2,
the gaseous organic compounds were grouped into a 25-bin volatility basis set (VBS;
Donahue et al., 2006) (Fig. 6a). Organic compounds with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower
than 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, between 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, between 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
between 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, between 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and higher than 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are termed ULVOCs, ELVOCs, LVOCs, SVOCs, IVOCs, and VOCs, respectively
(Donahue et al., 2009; Schervish and Donahue, 2020). The resulting VBS pie
charts for these compound groups and their mean contributions are shown in
Fig. 6b–d and Table 2. Organic compounds with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> made up the biggest mass contributions for MION-Br and
MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the dominating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin measured by Vocus was organic
compounds with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 6a).
Furthermore, Vocus observed much higher contributions of VOCs with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measured higher contributions of ELVOCs and ULVOCs with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (See Fig. 6a). And MION-Br and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observed
comparable contributions of compounds with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. We stress here that the fragmentation of
organic compounds inside the Vocus may bias the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results towards
higher volatilities.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3821"><bold>(a)</bold> Volatility distribution comparison for organic compounds
detected by different measurement techniques and parameterized with the
modified Li et al. (2016) approach (Daumit et al., 2013; Isaacman-VanWertz
and Aumont, 2021); resulting pie charts for the contributions of VOC, IVOC,
SVOC, LVOC, ELVOC, and ULVOC classes for MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>; MION-Br <bold>(c)</bold>; and Vocus <bold>(d)</bold>. Contributions of LVOC for Vocus (0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 %) and ULVOC for MION-Br (0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 %) were not labeled in the pie chart.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/8961/2021/acp-21-8961-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3868">Contributions (%, average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard deviation) of
different compound groups to total organics measured by different
measurement techniques based on the modified Li et al. (2016) approach
(Daumit et al., 2013; Isaacman-VanWertz and Aumont, 2021).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Compound</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Vocus</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MION-Br</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">group</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ULVOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ELVOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LVOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SVOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IVOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">45.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.4 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">56.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.6 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">53.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page8971?><p id="d1e4137">IVOCs, which include generally less oxygenated VOCs, comprised the
significant fraction of total organics (Vocus: 45.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.4 %;
MION-Br: 65.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.5 %; MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: 56.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.6 %),
indicating substantial oxidation extent of the precursor VOCs, which made up
53.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5 % of the total organics measured by Vocus but much less
by MION-Br (10.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.2 %) and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4 %;
see Fig. 6b–d and Table 2). SVOCs, which include slightly more oxygenated
VOCs, constituted substantially (Vocus: 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 %; MION-Br: 16.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 %; MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: 23.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.1 %) to the measured
organic compounds. LVOCs and ELVOCs, which include OVOCs with higher oxidation
degrees and mainly contribute to the growth of embryonic clusters in the
atmosphere (Donahue et al., 2012; Bianchi et al., 2019), accounted for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 % of the corresponding total organics measured by MION-Br
and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, while ULVOCs, which include OVOCs with even higher
oxidation extents that are the most effective drivers of pure biogenic
nucleation (Schervish and Donahue, 2020; Simon et al., 2020), accounted
for 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 % of total organics measured by MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (see
Fig. 6b–d and Table 2). Differences in the contribution of these compound
groups (Fig. 6b–d and Table 2) could be due to different sensitivities of
the instruments towards organic compounds with varying oxidation extents
(Riva et al., 2019).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4266"><bold>(a)</bold> Combined two-dimensional volatility distribution for all
measured organic compounds (with the approach described in Sect. 2.2.1)
parameterized with the modified Li et al. (2016) approach (Daumit et al.,
2013; Isaacman-VanWertz and Aumont, 2021). Markers were sized by the
logarithm of their corresponding concentrations, and marker color represents
that either the compound was only measured by that instrument or the maximum
concentration of the compound observed in common was detected by that
instrument; <bold>(b)</bold> resulting pie chart for the contributions of VOC, IVOC, SVOC, LVOC, ELVOC, and ULVOC classes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/8961/2021/acp-21-8961-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4280">With the complementary molecular information of organic compounds from
Vocus, MION-Br, and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, a combined volatility distribution was
plotted to estimate the bulk volatility of all measured organic compounds
(with the approach described in Sect. 2.2.1) at our measurement site
(Fig. 7). The combined volatility distribution covers very well from VOCs
to HOMs, with varying O : C ratios and volatility ranges (Fig. 7a). It
therefore provides a more complete picture of the volatility distribution of
gaseous organic compounds in this boreal forest. The average
mass-weighted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value representing the bulk of all
measured gaseous organic compounds in this boreal forest was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In general, MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 91 % of the ULVOCs, while MION-Br measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 % of the ELVOCs and Vocus measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 98 % of the IVOCs and VOCs (Fig. S10). As we can
see from Fig. 7b, the VOC class was found to be the most abundant (about
53.2 %), followed by the IVOC class (about 45.9 %), indicating that the bulk
gaseous organic compounds observed in this boreal forest were relatively
fresh, which is also consistent with the bulk molecular composition's
relatively low oxidation extent. Differences in the bulk volatility of
organic compounds between daytime (between 10:00 and 17:00) and nighttime
(between 22:00 and 05:00) were not significant (Fig. S11). Given the
location of the measurement station that is inside a boreal forested area,
the gaseous organic compounds were expected to be dominated by VOCs and IVOCs.
The abundance of the CH compounds such as terpenes (see Tables 1 and S2,
Figs. S3 and S6) as well as less oxygenated VOCs (see Figs. 3 and S5) supports this conclusion. Although the condensable vapors (LVOCs, ELVOCs,
and ULVOCs) only comprised about 0.2 % of the total gaseous organic
compounds, they contribute significantly to forming new particles via
nucleation and further particulate growth and mass via condensation in this
boreal forest (Kulmala et al., 2013; Ehn et al., 2014; Mohr et al., 2019).
The results from the combined VBS could provide a better basis to test and
improve parameterizations for predicting organic compound evolutions in
transport and climate models.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4375">In this paper, with an aim of obtaining a more complete picture from VOCs to
HOMs, the molecular composition and volatility of gaseous organic compounds
were investigated with the deployment of a Vocus and a MION API-ToF during
April–July 2019 at the SMEAR II station situated in a boreal forest in
Hyytiälä, southern Finland. Similar to previous laboratory results
(Riva et al., 2019), highest elemental O : C ratios of organic compounds
were observed by the MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1), followed by the
MION-Br (0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1), and lowest by the Vocus (0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1).
Unlike the patterns observed by Vocus, which were mostly dominated by
compounds with the number of carbon atoms between 3 and 10 and the number of
oxygen atoms between 1 and 3 (i.e., less oxygenated monomers), compounds
with a larger number of carbon atoms (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10) and oxygen atoms
(i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3) were much better detected by MION-Br (particularly
for larger less oxygenated monomers and dimers) and MION-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(particularly for HOM monomers and dimers). The average mass-weighted
chemical composition representing the bulk of all measured gaseous organic
compounds in this boreal forest was C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
indicative of the short carbon backbone and relatively low oxidation extent.
Besides, diurnal patterns of the measured organic compounds were found to
vary among different measurement techniques, even for compounds with the
same molecular formula. The results indicate contributions of different
isomers detected by the different techniques and/or fragmentation products
from<?pagebreak page8972?> different parent compounds inside the instruments (e.g., Heinritzi
et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e4468">From the more complete picture of the bulk volatility of all measured
organic compounds in this boreal forest, the average
mass-weighted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value representing the bulk of all
measured gaseous organic compounds in this boreal forest was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, the VOC class was found to be the most
abundant (about 53.2 %), followed by the IVOC class (about 45.9 %),
indicating that the bulk gaseous organic compounds were relatively fresh,
which is consistent with the bulk molecular composition's relatively low oxidation
extent. Although condensable organic compounds (LVOCs, ELVOCs, and ULVOCs) only
comprised about 0.2 % of the total gaseous organic compounds, they play
an important role, forming new particles via nucleation and contributing to
particulate growth and mass via condensation in this boreal forest
(Kulmala et al., 2013; Ehn et al., 2014; Mohr et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e4514">The results show the full characterization of the gaseous organic compounds
in the boreal forest and the advantages of combining Vocus and MION API-ToF
for measuring ambient gaseous organic compounds with different oxidation
extents (from VOCs to HOMs). Our study provides a more comprehensive
understanding of the molecular composition and volatility of atmospheric
organic compounds, as well as new insights when interpreting ambient
measurements or using them as input to test and improve parameterizations
for predicting organic compound evolutions in transport and climate models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4522">The time series of the measured trace gases, meteorological parameters, and the concentrations of terpenes (isoprene, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and diterpenes measured by Vocus) as well as total organics (measured by MION-Br, MION-NO3, Vocus, and ACSM) at the SMEAR II station are available from <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4925730" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4925730</ext-link> (Huang, 2021).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4528">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8961-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8961-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4537">WH analyzed the MION API-ToF data, produced all figures, and wrote and
edited the paper. HL operated and calibrated Vocus; analyzed the Vocus data;
provided suggestions for the data analysis, interpretation, and discussion;
and edited the paper. NS operated and calibrated the MION API-ToF; preprocessed
the MION API-ToF data with Labbis; and provided suggestions for the data analysis,
interpretation, and discussion. LH performed ACSM measurements, analyzed the
ACSM data, and provided suggestions for the data interpretation and
discussion. YJT provided suggestions for the data interpretation and
discussion. JM helped with the MION measurements and provided suggestions
for the data interpretation and discussion. SJT helped with the Vocus
measurements. NMD provided suggestions for the data interpretation and
discussion. MK organized the campaign and provided suggestions for the data
interpretation and discussion. FB organized the campaign; provided
suggestions for the data analysis, interpretation, and discussion; and
edited the paper. All authors contributed to the final text.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4543">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4550">This work was supported by the staff at INAR. Hyytiälä personnel are
acknowledged for their help in conducting the measurements. Jani Hakala​​​​​​​ is
acknowledged for his help with MION measurements. Junning Ma is acknowledged for his technical help with data analysis. We thank the tofTools team and Karsa Labbis team for providing tools for mass spectrometry data analysis.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4555">This research has been supported by the Academy of Finland (grant no. 311932), H2020 European Research Council (CHAPAs (grant no. 850614) and ATM-GTP (grant no. 742206)), Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation, and the National Science Foundation (grant no. AGS1801897).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Open-access funding was provided by the Helsinki<?xmltex \notforhtml{\newline}?> University Library.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4566">This paper was edited by Eleanor Browne and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Äijälä, M., Heikkinen, L., Fröhlich, R., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Junninen, H., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D., and Ehn, M.: Resolving anthropogenic aerosol pollution types – deconvolution and exploratory classification of pollution events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3165–3197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3165-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-3165-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic
compounds, Chem. Rev., 103, 4605–4638,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr0206420</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Barreira, L. M. F., Duporte, G., Parshintsev, J., Hartonen, K., Jussila, M.,
Aalto, J., Back, J., Kulmala, M., and Riekkola, M. L.: Emissions of biogenic
volatile organic compounds from the boreal forest floor and understory: a
study by solid-phase microextraction and portable gas chromatography-mass
spectrometry, Boreal Environ. Res., 22, 393–413, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baumbach, G. and Vogt, U.: Influence of inversion layers on the
distribution of air pollutants in urban areas, Water Air Soil
Poll.: Focus, 3, 67–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026098305581" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1026098305581</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berresheim, H., Elste, T., Plass-Dülmer, C., Eisele, F. L., and Tanner,
D. J.: Chemical ionization mass spectrometer for long-term measurements of
atmospheric OH and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 202, 91–109,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-3806(00)00233-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1387-3806(00)00233-5</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berndt, T., Richters, S., Kaethner, R., Voigtlander, J., Stratmann, F.,
Sipila, M., Kulmala, M., and Herrmann, H.: Gas-phase ozonolysis of
cycloalkenes: formation of highly oxidized RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and their reactions with NO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and other RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 10336–10348,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07295" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07295</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bianchi, F., Tröstl, J., Junninen, H., Frege, C., Henne, S., Hoyle, C.
R., Molteni, U., Herrmann, E., Adamov, A., Bukowiecki, N., Chen, X.,
Duplissy, J., Gysel, M., Hutterli, M., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J.,
Kürten, A., Manninen, H. E., Münch, S., Peräkylä, O.,
Petäjä, T., Rondo, L., Williamson, C., Weingartner, E., Curtius, J.,
Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: New particle
formation in the free troposphere: a question of chemistry and timing,
Science, 352, 1109–1112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5456" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aad5456</ext-link> 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bianchi, F., Garmash, O., He, X., Yan, C., Iyer, S., Rosendahl, I., Xu, Z., Rissanen, M. P., Riva, M., Taipale, R., Sarnela, N., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Junninen, H.: The role of highly oxygenated molecules (HOMs) in determining the composition of ambient ions in the boreal forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13819–13831, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13819-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-13819-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bianchi, F., Kurtén, T., Riva, M., Mohr, C., Rissanen, M. P., Roldin,
P., Berndt, T., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Mentel, T. F., Wildt, J.,
Junninen, H., Jokinen, T., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Thornton, J. A.,
Donahue, N., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Ehn, M.: Highly oxygenated organic
molecules (HOM) from gas-phase autoxidation involving peroxy radicals: a key
contributor to atmospheric aerosol, Chem. Rev., 119, 3472–3509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00395</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boers, R., van Weele, M., van Meijgaard, E., Savenije, M., Siebesma, A. P.,
Bosveld, F., and Stammes, P.: Observations and projections of visibility and
aerosol optical thickness (1956–2100) in the Netherlands: impacts of
time-varying aerosol composition and hygroscopicity, Environ. Res.
Lett., 10, 015003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/015003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/015003</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boyd, C. M., Sanchez, J., Xu, L., Eugene, A. J., Nah, T., Tuet, W. Y., Guzman, M. I., and Ng, N. L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system: effect of humidity and peroxy radical fate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7497–7522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7497-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7497-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Caldwell, G. W., Masucci, J. A., and Ikonomou, M. G.: Negative-ion chemical
ionization mass-spectrometry binding of molecules to bromide and iodide
Anions, Org. Mass Spectrom., 24, 8–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/oms.1210240103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/oms.1210240103</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D. and Jimenez, J. L.: Quantitative estimates of the volatility of ambient organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5409–5424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5409-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5409-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Daumit, K. E., Kessler, S. H., and Kroll, J. H.: Average chemical properties
and potential formation pathways of highly oxidized organic aerosol, Faraday
Discuss., 165, 181–202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00045A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3FD00045A</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052297c</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric organic
particulate matter: from smoke to secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Environ.,
43, 94–106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.055</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Epstein, S. A., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A two-dimensional volatility basis set: 1. organic-aerosol mixing thermodynamics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3303–3318, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3303-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3303-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Kroll, J. H., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A two-dimensional volatility basis set – Part 2: Diagnostics of organic-aerosol evolution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 615–634, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-615-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H.,
Pullinen, I., Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee<?pagebreak page8974?>, B.,
Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres, S., Acir, I. H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T.,
Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurtén,
T., Nielsen, L. B., Jørgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M.,
Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V. M.,
Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of
low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13032</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Epstein, S. A., Riipinen, I., and Donahue, N. M.: A semiempirical
correlation between enthalpy of vaporization and saturation concentration
for organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 743–748, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es902497z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es902497z</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Faxon, C., Hammes, J., Le Breton, M., Pathak, R. K., and Hallquist, M.: Characterization of organic nitrate constituents of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from nitrate-radical-initiated oxidation of limonene using high-resolution chemical ionization mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5467–5481, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5467-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-5467-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gross, J. H.: Mass Spectrometry, 3rd edn., Springer International Publishing,
Cham, Switzerland, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T.,
Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., Mckay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B.,
Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmerman, P.: A global
model of natural volatile organic compound emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
100, 8873–8892, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94jd02950" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94jd02950</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hakola, H., Hellén, H., Hemmilä, M., Rinne, J., and Kulmala, M.: In situ measurements of volatile organic compounds in a boreal forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11665–11678, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11665-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11665-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hammes, J., Lutz, A., Mentel, T., Faxon, C., and Hallquist, M.: Carboxylic acids from limonene oxidation by ozone and hydroxyl radicals: insights into mechanisms derived using a FIGAERO-CIMS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13037–13052, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13037-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-13037-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hari, P. and Kulmala, M.: Station for measuring ecosystematmosphere relations, Boreal Environ. Res., 10, 315–322, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Henze, D. K., Horowitz, L. W., Feddema, J., Lamarque, J.-F.,
Guenther, A., Hess, P. G., Vitt, F., Seinfeld, J. H., Goldstein, A. H., and
Fung, I.: Predicted change in global secondary organic aerosol
concentrations in response to future climate, emissions, and land use
change, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D05211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009092</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heikkinen, L., Äijälä, M., Riva, M., Luoma, K., Dällenbach, K., Aalto, J., Aalto, P., Aliaga, D., Aurela, M., Keskinen, H., Makkonen, U., Rantala, P., Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D., and Ehn, M.: Long-term sub-micrometer aerosol chemical composition in the boreal forest: inter- and intra-annual variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3151–3180, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3151-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3151-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Steiner, G., Wagner, A. C., Kürten, A., Hansel, A., and Curtius, J.: Characterization of the mass-dependent transmission efficiency of a CIMS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1449–1460, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1449-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-1449-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, W.: Data for “Measurement report: Molecular composition and volatility of gaseous organic compounds in a boreal forest – from volatile organic compounds to highly oxygenated organic molecules”, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4925730" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4925730</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, W., Saathoff, H., Shen, X., Ramisetty, R., Leisner, T., and Mohr, C.:
Chemical characterization of highly functionalized organonitrates
contributing to night-time organic aerosol mass loadings and particle
growth, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 1165–1174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05826" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b05826</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, W., Saathoff, H., Shen, X., Ramisetty, R., Leisner, T., and Mohr, C.: Seasonal characteristics of organic aerosol chemical composition and volatility in Stuttgart, Germany, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11687–11700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11687-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-11687-2019</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hyttinen, N., Otkjaer, R. V., Iyer, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Rissanen, M. P.,
Wennberg, P. O., and Kurtén, T.: Computational comparison of different
reagent ions in the chemical ionization of oxidized multifunctional
compounds, J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 269–279,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b10015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.7b10015</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate change 2013: The physical scientific basis, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK, 622–623, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Isaacman-VanWertz, G. and Aumont, B.: Impact of organic molecular structure on the estimation of atmospherically relevant physicochemical parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6541–6563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6541-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-6541-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Junninen, H., Ehn, M., Petäjä, T., Luosujärvi, L., Kotiaho, T., Kostiainen, R., Rohner, U., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Kulmala, M., and Worsnop, D. R.: A high-resolution mass spectrometer to measure atmospheric ion composition, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1039–1053, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1039-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-1039-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaser, L., Karl, T., Guenther, A., Graus, M., Schnitzhofer, R., Turnipseed, A., Fischer, L., Harley, P., Madronich, M., Gochis, D., Keutsch, F. N., and Hansel, A.: Undisturbed and disturbed above canopy ponderosa pine emissions: PTR-TOF-MS measurements and MEGAN 2.1 model results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11935–11947, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11935-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-11935-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., Frege, C., Gordon, H., Williamson,
C., Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., Tröstl, J.,
Nieminen, T., Ortega, I. K., Wagner, R., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bernhammer,
A.-K., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Chen, X. M., Craven, J.,
Dias, A., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R.,
Hakala, J., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Kim,
J., Krapf, M., Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V.,
Mathot, S., Molteni, U., Onnela, A., Peräkylä, O., Piel, F.,
Petäjä, T., Praplan, A. P., Pringle, K., Rap, A., Richards, N. A.
D., Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger,
S., Scott, C. E., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov,
Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, A. C.,
Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P. L.,
Zhang, X., Hansel, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Worsnop, D. R.,
Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Carslaw, K. S., and Curtius, J.: Ion-induced
nucleation of pure biogenic particles, Nature, 533, 521–526, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature17953</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Krechmer, J., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Koss, A., Hutterli, M., Stoermer, C.,
Deming, B., Kimmel, J., Warneke, C., Holzinger, R., Jayne, J., Worsnop, D.,
Fuhrer, K., Gonin, M., an<?pagebreak page8975?>d de Gouw, J.: Evaluation of a new reagent-ion
source and focusing ion-molecule reactor for use in proton-transfer-reaction
mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 90, 12011–12018, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02641" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02641</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Toivonen, A., Mäkelä, J. M., and Laaksonen, A.:
Analysis of the growth of nucleation mode particles observed in boreal
forest, Tellus B, 50, 449–462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v50i5.16229" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v50i5.16229</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E.,
Nieminen, T., Petäjä, T., Sipilä, M., Schobesberger, S.,
Rantala, P., Franchin, A., Jokinen, T., Järvinen, E.,
Äijälä, M., Kangasluoma, J., Hakala, J., Aalto, P. P., Paasonen,
P., Mikkilä, J., Vanhanen, J., Aalto, J., Hakola, H., Makkonen, U.,
Ruuskanen, T., Mauldin III, R. L., Duplissy, J., Vehkamäki, H.,
Bäck, J., Kortelainen, A., Riipinen, I., Kurtén, T., Johnston, M.
V., Smith, J. N., Ehn, M., Mentel, T. F., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A.,
Kerminen, V.-M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Direct observations of atmospheric
aerosol nucleation, Science, 339, 943–946, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1227385</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kürten, A., Rondo, L., Ehrhart, S., and Curtius, J.: Calibration of a
chemical ionization mass spectrometer for the measurement of gaseous
sulfuric acid, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 6375–6386,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp212123n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp212123n</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, B. H., Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Lee,
L., Romer, P., Cohen, R. C., Iyer, S., Kurtén, T., Hu, W. W., Day, D.
A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Guo, H. Y.,
Weber, R. J., Wild, R. J., Brown, S. S., Koss, A., de Gouw, J., Olson, K.,
Goldstein, A. H., Seco, R., Kim, S., McAvey, K., Shepson, P. B., Starn, T.,
Baumann, K., Edgerton, E. S., Liu, J. M., Shilling, J. E., Miller, D. O.,
Brune, W., Schobesberger, S., D'Ambro, E. L., and Thornton, J. A.: Highly
functionalized organic nitrates in the southeast United States: Contribution
to secondary organic aerosol and reactive nitrogen budgets, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 113, 1516–1521, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508108113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1508108113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, H., Riva, M., Rantala, P., Heikkinen, L., Daellenbach, K., Krechmer, J. E., Flaud, P.-M., Worsnop, D., Kulmala, M., Villenave, E., Perraudin, E., Ehn, M., and Bianchi, F.: Terpenes and their oxidation products in the French Landes forest: insights from Vocus PTR-TOF measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1941–1959, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1941-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1941-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, H., Canagaratna, M. R., Riva, M., Rantala, P., Zhang, Y., Thomas, S., Heikkinen, L., Flaud, P.-M., Villenave, E., Perraudin, E., Worsnop, D., Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Bianchi, F.: Atmospheric organic vapors in two European pine forests measured by a Vocus PTR-TOF: insights into monoterpene and sesquiterpene oxidation processes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4123–4147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4123-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-4123-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.: Molecular corridors and parameterizations of volatility in the chemical evolution of organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3327–3344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3327-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3327-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Liao, L., Dal Maso, M., Taipale, R., Rinne, J., Ehn, M., Junninen, H.,
Äijälä, M., Nieminen, T., Alekseychik, P., Hulkkonen, M.,
Worsnop, D. R., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.: Monoterpene pollution
episodes in a forest environment: indication of anthropogenic origin and
association with aerosol particles, Boreal Environ. Res., 16, 288–303, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Mohr, C., Ehn, M., Rubach, F., Kleist, E., Wildt, J., Mentel, Th. F., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Worsnop, D., and Thornton, J. A.: A novel method for online analysis of gas and particle composition: description and evaluation of a Filter Inlet for Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 983–1001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-983-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-983-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Asmi, E., Gagné, S., Häkkinen, S., Lehtipalo, K., Aalto, P., Vana, M., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Hõrrak, U., Plass-Dülmer, C., Stange, G., Kiss, G., Hoffer, A., Törő, N., Moerman, M., Henzing, B., de Leeuw, G., Brinkenberg, M., Kouvarakis, G. N., Bougiatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Arneth, A., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tarozzi, L., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Birmili, W., Sonntag, A., Wiedensohler, A., Boulon, J., Sellegri, K., Laj, P., Gysel, M., Bukowiecki, N., Weingartner, E., Wehrle, G., Laaksonen, A., Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.: EUCAARI ion spectrometer measurements at 12 European sites – analysis of new particle formation events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7907–7927, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Massoli, P., Stark, H., Canagaratna, M. R., Krechmer, J. E., Xu, L., Ng, N.
L., Mauldin, R. L., Yan, C., Kimmel, J., Misztal, P. K., Jimenez, J. L.,
Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Ambient measurements of highly oxidized
gas-phase molecules during the Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS)
2013, Acs Earth Space Chem., 2, 653–672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00028</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mohr, C., Thornton, J. A., Heitto, A., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Lutz, A.,
Riipinen, I., Hong, J., Donahue, N. M., Hallquist, M., Petaja, T., Kulmala,
M., and Yli-Juuti, T.: Molecular identification of organic vapors driving
atmospheric nanoparticle growth, Nat. Commun., 10, 4442, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12473-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-019-12473-2</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Molteni, U., Simon, M., Heinritzi, M., Hoyle, C. R., Bernhammer, A.-K.,
Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Dias, A., Duplissy, J., Frege,
C., Gordon, H., Heyn, C., Jokinen, T., Kürten, A., Lehtipalo, K.,
Makhmutov, V., Petäjä, T., Pieber, S. M., Praplan, A. P.,
Schobesberger, S., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J.,
Wagner, A. C., Wagner, R., Williamson, C., Yan, C., Baltensperger, U.,
Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Hansel, A., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Worsnop,
D. R., and Dommen, J.: Formation of highly oxygenated organic molecules from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis: chemical characteristics, mechanism, and
kinetic model development, Acs Earth Space Chem., 3, 873–883,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00035</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nash, D. G., Baer, T., and Johnston, M. V.: Aerosol mass spectrometry: an
introductory review, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 258, 2–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.017</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nel, A.: Air pollution-related illness: effects of particles, Science, 308,
804–806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108752" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1108752</ext-link> 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L.,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y. L., and Jayne,
J. T.: An aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) for routine monitoring
of the composition and mass concentrations of ambient aerosol,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 780–794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.560211</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page8976?><ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pankow, J. F. and Asher, W. E.: SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of multifunctional organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2773–2796, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rissanen, M. P., Mikkilä, J., Iyer, S., and Hakala, J.: Multi-scheme chemical ionization inlet (MION) for fast switching of reagent ion chemistry in atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS) applications, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6635–6646, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6635-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-6635-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Riva, M., Rantala, P., Krechmer, J. E., Peräkylä, O., Zhang, Y., Heikkinen, L., Garmash, O., Yan, C., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D., and Ehn, M.: Evaluating the performance of five different chemical ionization techniques for detecting gaseous oxygenated organic species, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2403–2421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2403-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-2403-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rückerl, R., Schneider, A., Breitner, S., Cyrys, J., and Peters, A.:
Health effects of particulate air pollution: a review of epidemiological
evidence, Inhal. Toxicol., 23, 555–592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2011.593587" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3109/08958378.2011.593587</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sanchez, J., Tanner, D. J., Chen, D., Huey, L. G., and Ng, N. L.: A new technique for the direct detection of HO2 radicals using bromide chemical ionization mass spectrometry (Br-CIMS): initial characterization, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 3851–3861, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3851-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-3851-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schervish, M. and Donahue, N. M.: Peroxy radical chemistry and the volatility basis set, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1183–1199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1183-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1183-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sekimoto, K., Li, S. M., Yuan, B., Koss, A., Coggon, M., Warneke, C., and de
Gouw, J.: Calculation of the sensitivity of proton-transfer-reaction mass
spectrometry (PTR-MS) for organic trace gases using molecular properties,
Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 421, 71–94, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.006</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Simon, M., Dada, L., Heinritzi, M., Scholz, W., Stolzenburg, D., Fischer, L., Wagner, A. C., Kürten, A., Rörup, B., He, X.-C., Almeida, J., Baalbaki, R., Baccarini, A., Bauer, P. S., Beck, L., Bergen, A., Bianchi, F., Bräkling, S., Brilke, S., Caudillo, L., Chen, D., Chu, B., Dias, A., Draper, D. C., Duplissy, J., El-Haddad, I., Finkenzeller, H., Frege, C., Gonzalez-Carracedo, L., Gordon, H., Granzin, M., Hakala, J., Hofbauer, V., Hoyle, C. R., Kim, C., Kong, W., Lamkaddam, H., Lee, C. P., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Mai, H., Manninen, H. E., Marie, G., Marten, R., Mentler, B., Molteni, U., Nichman, L., Nie, W., Ojdanic, A., Onnela, A., Partoll, E., Petäjä, T., Pfeifer, J., Philippov, M., Quéléver, L. L. J., Ranjithkumar, A., Rissanen, M. P., Schallhart, S., Schobesberger, S., Schuchmann, S., Shen, J., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tauber, C., Tham, Y. J., Tomé, A. R., Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, R., Wang, M., Wang, D. S., Wang, Y., Weber, S. K., Wu, Y., Xiao, M., Yan, C., Ye, P., Ye, Q., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Zhou, X., Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., Flagan, R. C., Hansel, A., Kulmala, M., Volkamer, R., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., Kirkby, J., and Curtius, J.: Molecular understanding of new-particle formation from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>50 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9183–9207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9183-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-9183-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sindelarova, K., Granier, C., Bouarar, I., Guenther, A., Tilmes, S., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Kuhn, U., Stefani, P., and Knorr, W.: Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over the last 30 years, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9317–9341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stolzenburg, D., Fischer, L., Vogel, A. L., Heinritzi, M., Schervish, M.,
Simon, M., Wagner, A. C., Dada, L., Ahonen, L. R., Amorim, A., Baccarini,
A., Bauer, P. S., Baumgartner, B., Bergen, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner,
M., Brilke, S., Mazon, S. B., Chen, D. X., Dias, A., Draper, D. C.,
Duplissy, J., Haddad, I., Finkenzeller, H., Frege, C., Fuchs, C., Garmash,
O., Gordon, H., He, X., Helm, J., Hofbauer, V., Hoyle, C. R., Kim, C.,
Kirkby, J., Kontkanen, J., Kürten, A., Lampilahti, J., Lawler, M.,
Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Mai, H., Mathot, S., Mentler, B., Molteni, U.,
Nie, W., Nieminen, T., Nowak, J. B., Ojdanic, A., Onnela, A., Passananti,
M., Petäjä, T., Quéléver, L. L. J., Rissanen, M. P.,
Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Tauber, C., Tomé, A., Wagner, R., Wang, M.,
Weitz, L., Wimmer, D., Xiao, M., Yan, C., Ye, P., Zha, Q., Baltensperger,
U., Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Flagan, R. C., Kulmala, M., Smith, J. N.,
Worsnop, D. R., Hansel, A., Donahue, N. M., and Winkler, P. M.: Rapid growth
of organic aerosol nanoparticles over a wide tropospheric temperature range,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 9122–9127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807604115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1807604115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sullivan, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: Recent advances in our understanding of
atmospheric chemistry and climate made possible by on-line aerosol analysis
instrumentation, Anal. Chem., 77, 3861–3885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050716i" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac050716i</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tröstl, J., Chuang, W. K., Gordon, H., Heinritzi, M., Yan, C., Molteni,
U., Ahlm, L., Frege, C., Bianchi, F., Wagner, R., Simon, M., Lehtipalo, K.,
Williamson, C., Craven, J. S., Duplissy, J., Adamov, A., Almeida, J.,
Bernhammer, A.-K., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Dias, A., Ehrhart, S.,
Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R., Gysel, M., Hansel, A.,
Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kim,
J., Krapf, M., Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lawler, M., Leiminger, M.,
Mathot, S., Möhler, O., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T.,
Piel, F. M., Miettinen, P., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N.,
Schobesberger, S., Sengupta, K., Sipilä, M., Smith, J. N., Steiner, G.,
Tomè, A., Virtanen, A., Wagner, A. C., Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D.,
Winkler, P. M., Ye, P. L., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Kirkby,
J., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., and
Baltensperger, U.: The role of low-volatility organic compounds in initial
particle growth in the atmosphere, Nature, 533, 527–531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18271" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature18271</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Viggiano, A. A., Seeley, J. V., Mundis, P. L., Williamson, J. S., and
Morris, R. A.: Rate constants for the reactions of XO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-(H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C, HC, and N) and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-(HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: implications for atmospheric detection of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 101, 8275–8278,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp971768h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp971768h</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, M. Y., Chen, D. X., Xiao, M., Ye, Q., Stolzenburg, D., Hofbauer, V.,
Ye, P. L., Vogel, A. L., Mauldin III, R. L., Amorim, A., Baccarini, A.,
Baumgartner, B., Brilke, S., Dada, L., Dias, A., Duplissy, J., Finkenzeller,
H., Garmash, O., He, X. C., Hoyle, C. R., Kim, C., Kvashnin, A., Lehtipalo,
K., Fischer, L., Molteni, U., Petäjä, T., Pospisilova, V.,
Quéléver, L. L. J., Rissanen, M., Simon, M., Tauber, C., Tomé,
A., Wagner, A. C., Weitz, L., Volkamer, R., Winkler, P. M., Kirkby, J.,
Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., El-Haddad, I.,
and Donahue, N. M.: Photo-oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons produces
low-volatility organic compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 7911–7921,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c02100</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page8977?><ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Williams, J., Crowley, J., Fischer, H., Harder, H., Martinez, M., Petäjä, T., Rinne, J., Bäck, J., Boy, M., Dal Maso, M., Hakala, J., Kajos, M., Keronen, P., Rantala, P., Aalto, J., Aaltonen, H., Paatero, J., Vesala, T., Hakola, H., Levula, J., Pohja, T., Herrmann, F., Auld, J., Mesarchaki, E., Song, W., Yassaa, N., Nölscher, A., Johnson, A. M., Custer, T., Sinha, V., Thieser, J., Pouvesle, N., Taraborrelli, D., Tang, M. J., Bozem, H., Hosaynali-Beygi, Z., Axinte, R., Oswald, R., Novelli, A., Kubistin, D., Hens, K., Javed, U., Trawny, K., Breitenberger, C., Hidalgo, P. J., Ebben, C. J., Geiger, F. M., Corrigan, A. L., Russell, L. M., Ouwersloot, H. G., Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., Ganzeveld, L., Vogel, A., Beck, M., Bayerle, A., Kampf, C. J., Bertelmann, M., Köllner, F., Hoffmann, T., Valverde, J., González, D., Riekkola, M.-L., Kulmala, M., and Lelieveld, J.: The summertime Boreal forest field measurement intensive (HUMPPA-COPEC-2010): an overview of meteorological and chemical influences, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10599–10618, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10599-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-10599-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yan, C., Nie, W., Äijälä, M., Rissanen, M. P., Canagaratna, M. R., Massoli, P., Junninen, H., Jokinen, T., Sarnela, N., Häme, S. A. K., Schobesberger, S., Canonaco, F., Yao, L., Prévôt, A. S. H., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Sipilä, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Ehn, M.: Source characterization of highly oxidized multifunctional compounds in a boreal forest environment using positive matrix factorization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12715–12731, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12715-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12715-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ye, Q., Wang, M. Y., Hofbauer, V., Stolzenburg, D., Chen, D. X., Schervish,
M., Vogel, A., Mauldin, R. L., Baalbaki, R., Brilke, S., Dada, L., Dias, A.,
Duplissy, J., El Haddad, I., Finkenzeller, H., Fischer, L., He, X. C., Kim,
C., Kürten, A., Lamkaddam, H., Lee, C. P., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M.,
Manninen, H. E., Marten, R., Mentler, B., Partoll, E., Petäjä, T.,
Rissanen, M., Schobesberger, S., Schuchmann, S., Simon, M., Tham, Y. J.,
Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Wagner, A. C., Wang, Y. H., Wu, Y. S., Xiao, M.,
Baltensperger, U., Curtius, J., Flagan, R., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M.,
Volkamer, R., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D., and Donahue, N. M.: Molecular
composition and volatility of nucleated particles from alpha-pinene
oxidation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 12357–12365, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03265" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b03265</ext-link>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yuan, B., Koss, A. R., Warneke, C., Coggon, M., Sekimoto, K., and de Gouw,
J. A.: Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry: applications in
atmospheric sciences, Chem. Rev., 117, 13187–13229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00325" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00325</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zha, Q., Yan, C., Junninen, H., Riva, M., Sarnela, N., Aalto, J., Quéléver, L., Schallhart, S., Dada, L., Heikkinen, L., Peräkylä, O., Zou, J., Rose, C., Wang, Y., Mammarella, I., Katul, G., Vesala, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Bianchi, F., and Ehn, M.: Vertical characterization of highly oxygenated molecules (HOMs) below and above a boreal forest canopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17437–17450, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17437-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17437-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., McVay, R. C., Huang, D. D., Dalleska, N. F., Aumont, B., Flagan,
R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Formation and evolution of molecular products in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene secondary organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112,
14168–14173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517742112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1517742112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Lambe, A. T., Upshur, M. A., Brooks, W. A., Beì, A. G., Thomson,
R. J., Geiger, F. M., Surratt, J. D., Zhang, Z. F., Gold, A., Graf, S.,
Cubison, M. J., Groessl, M., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Canagaratna,
M. R.: Highly oxygenated multifunctional compounds in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5932–5940, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06588" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b06588</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Thornton, J. A., and Pye, H. O. T.: Quantitative constraints on
autoxidation and dimer formation from direct probing of monoterpene-derived
peroxy radical chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 12142–12147,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812147115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1812147115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Measurement report: Molecular composition and volatility of gaseous organic compounds in a boreal forest – from volatile organic compounds to highly oxygenated organic molecules</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The molecular composition and volatility of gaseous organic
compounds were investigated during April–July 2019 at the Station for
Measuring Ecosystem – Atmosphere Relations (SMEAR) II situated in a boreal
forest in Hyytiälä, southern Finland. In order to obtain a more
complete picture and full understanding of the molecular composition and
volatility of ambient gaseous organic compounds (from volatile organic
compounds, VOCs, to highly oxygenated organic molecules, HOMs), two
different instruments were used. A Vocus proton-transfer-reaction
time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Vocus PTR-ToF; hereafter Vocus) was
deployed to measure VOCs and less oxygenated VOCs (i.e., OVOCs). In
addition, a multi-scheme chemical ionization inlet coupled to an atmospheric
pressure interface time-of-flight mass spectrometer (MION API-ToF) was used
to detect less oxygenated VOCs (using Br<sup>−</sup> as the reagent ion; hereafter
MION-Br) and more oxygenated VOCs (including HOMs; using NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> as
the reagent ion; hereafter MION-NO<sub>3</sub>). The comparison among different
measurement techniques revealed that the highest elemental oxygen-to-carbon
ratios (O&thinsp;:&thinsp;C) of organic compounds were observed by the MION-NO<sub>3</sub> (0.9&thinsp;±&thinsp;0.1, average&thinsp;±&thinsp;1 standard deviation), followed by the MION-Br
(0.8&thinsp;±&thinsp;0.1); lowest O&thinsp;:&thinsp;C ratios were observed by Vocus (0.2&thinsp;±&thinsp;0.1). Diurnal patterns
of the measured organic compounds were found to vary among different
measurement techniques, even for compounds with the same molecular formula,
suggesting contributions of different isomers detected by the different
techniques and/or fragmentation from different parent compounds inside the
instruments. Based on the complementary molecular information obtained from
Vocus, MION-Br, and MION-NO<sub>3</sub>, a more complete picture of the bulk
volatility of all measured organic compounds in this boreal forest was
obtained. As expected, the VOC class was the most abundant (about 53.2&thinsp;%), followed by intermediate-volatility organic compounds (IVOCs, about
45.9&thinsp;%). Although condensable organic compounds (low-volatility organic
compounds, LVOCs; extremely low volatility organic compounds, ELVOCs; and
ultralow-volatility organic compounds, ULVOCs) only comprised about 0.2&thinsp;%
of the total gaseous organic compounds, they play an important role in new
particle formation as shown in previous studies in this boreal forest. Our
study shows the full characterization of the gaseous organic compounds in
the boreal forest and the advantages of combining Vocus and MION API-ToF for
measuring ambient organic compounds with different oxidation extents (from
VOCs to HOMs). The results therefore provide a more comprehensive
understanding of the molecular composition and volatility of atmospheric
organic compounds as well as new insights into interpreting ambient
measurements or testing/improving parameterizations in transport and climate
models.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Äijälä, M., Heikkinen, L., Fröhlich, R., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Junninen, H., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D., and Ehn, M.: Resolving anthropogenic aerosol pollution types – deconvolution and exploratory classification of pollution events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3165–3197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3165-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3165-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic
compounds, Chem. Rev., 103, 4605–4638,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Barreira, L. M. F., Duporte, G., Parshintsev, J., Hartonen, K., Jussila, M.,
Aalto, J., Back, J., Kulmala, M., and Riekkola, M. L.: Emissions of biogenic
volatile organic compounds from the boreal forest floor and understory: a
study by solid-phase microextraction and portable gas chromatography-mass
spectrometry, Boreal Environ. Res., 22, 393–413, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Baumbach, G. and Vogt, U.: Influence of inversion layers on the
distribution of air pollutants in urban areas, Water Air Soil
Poll.: Focus, 3, 67–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026098305581" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026098305581</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Berresheim, H., Elste, T., Plass-Dülmer, C., Eisele, F. L., and Tanner,
D. J.: Chemical ionization mass spectrometer for long-term measurements of
atmospheric OH and H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 202, 91–109,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-3806(00)00233-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-3806(00)00233-5</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Berndt, T., Richters, S., Kaethner, R., Voigtlander, J., Stratmann, F.,
Sipila, M., Kulmala, M., and Herrmann, H.: Gas-phase ozonolysis of
cycloalkenes: formation of highly oxidized RO<sub>2</sub> radicals and their reactions with NO, NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, and other RO<sub>2</sub> radicals, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 10336–10348,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07295" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07295</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bianchi, F., Tröstl, J., Junninen, H., Frege, C., Henne, S., Hoyle, C.
R., Molteni, U., Herrmann, E., Adamov, A., Bukowiecki, N., Chen, X.,
Duplissy, J., Gysel, M., Hutterli, M., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J.,
Kürten, A., Manninen, H. E., Münch, S., Peräkylä, O.,
Petäjä, T., Rondo, L., Williamson, C., Weingartner, E., Curtius, J.,
Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: New particle
formation in the free troposphere: a question of chemistry and timing,
Science, 352, 1109–1112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5456" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5456</a> 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bianchi, F., Garmash, O., He, X., Yan, C., Iyer, S., Rosendahl, I., Xu, Z., Rissanen, M. P., Riva, M., Taipale, R., Sarnela, N., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Junninen, H.: The role of highly oxygenated molecules (HOMs) in determining the composition of ambient ions in the boreal forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13819–13831, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13819-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13819-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bianchi, F., Kurtén, T., Riva, M., Mohr, C., Rissanen, M. P., Roldin,
P., Berndt, T., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Mentel, T. F., Wildt, J.,
Junninen, H., Jokinen, T., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Thornton, J. A.,
Donahue, N., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Ehn, M.: Highly oxygenated organic
molecules (HOM) from gas-phase autoxidation involving peroxy radicals: a key
contributor to atmospheric aerosol, Chem. Rev., 119, 3472–3509, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00395" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00395</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Boers, R., van Weele, M., van Meijgaard, E., Savenije, M., Siebesma, A. P.,
Bosveld, F., and Stammes, P.: Observations and projections of visibility and
aerosol optical thickness (1956–2100) in the Netherlands: impacts of
time-varying aerosol composition and hygroscopicity, Environ. Res.
Lett., 10, 015003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/015003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/015003</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, C. M., Sanchez, J., Xu, L., Eugene, A. J., Nah, T., Tuet, W. Y., Guzman, M. I., and Ng, N. L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from the <i>β</i>-pinene&thinsp;+&thinsp;NO<sub>3</sub> system: effect of humidity and peroxy radical fate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7497–7522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7497-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7497-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Caldwell, G. W., Masucci, J. A., and Ikonomou, M. G.: Negative-ion chemical
ionization mass-spectrometry binding of molecules to bromide and iodide
Anions, Org. Mass Spectrom., 24, 8–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/oms.1210240103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/oms.1210240103</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Cappa, C. D. and Jimenez, J. L.: Quantitative estimates of the volatility of ambient organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5409–5424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5409-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5409-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Daumit, K. E., Kessler, S. H., and Kroll, J. H.: Average chemical properties
and potential formation pathways of highly oxidized organic aerosol, Faraday
Discuss., 165, 181–202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00045A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00045A</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric organic
particulate matter: from smoke to secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Environ.,
43, 94–106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.055</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Epstein, S. A., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A two-dimensional volatility basis set: 1. organic-aerosol mixing thermodynamics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3303–3318, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3303-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3303-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Kroll, J. H., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A two-dimensional volatility basis set – Part 2: Diagnostics of organic-aerosol evolution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 615–634, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H.,
Pullinen, I., Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B.,
Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres, S., Acir, I. H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T.,
Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurtén,
T., Nielsen, L. B., Jørgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M.,
Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V. M.,
Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of
low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Epstein, S. A., Riipinen, I., and Donahue, N. M.: A semiempirical
correlation between enthalpy of vaporization and saturation concentration
for organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 743–748, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es902497z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es902497z</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Faxon, C., Hammes, J., Le Breton, M., Pathak, R. K., and Hallquist, M.: Characterization of organic nitrate constituents of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from nitrate-radical-initiated oxidation of limonene using high-resolution chemical ionization mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5467–5481, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5467-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5467-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Gross, J. H.: Mass Spectrometry, 3rd edn., Springer International Publishing,
Cham, Switzerland, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T.,
Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., Mckay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B.,
Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmerman, P.: A global
model of natural volatile organic compound emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
100, 8873–8892, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94jd02950" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94jd02950</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hakola, H., Hellén, H., Hemmilä, M., Rinne, J., and Kulmala, M.: In situ measurements of volatile organic compounds in a boreal forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11665–11678, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11665-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11665-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hammes, J., Lutz, A., Mentel, T., Faxon, C., and Hallquist, M.: Carboxylic acids from limonene oxidation by ozone and hydroxyl radicals: insights into mechanisms derived using a FIGAERO-CIMS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13037–13052, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13037-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13037-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hari, P. and Kulmala, M.: Station for measuring ecosystematmosphere relations, Boreal Environ. Res., 10, 315–322, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Heald, C. L., Henze, D. K., Horowitz, L. W., Feddema, J., Lamarque, J.-F.,
Guenther, A., Hess, P. G., Vitt, F., Seinfeld, J. H., Goldstein, A. H., and
Fung, I.: Predicted change in global secondary organic aerosol
concentrations in response to future climate, emissions, and land use
change, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D05211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009092" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009092</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Heikkinen, L., Äijälä, M., Riva, M., Luoma, K., Dällenbach, K., Aalto, J., Aalto, P., Aliaga, D., Aurela, M., Keskinen, H., Makkonen, U., Rantala, P., Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D., and Ehn, M.: Long-term sub-micrometer aerosol chemical composition in the boreal forest: inter- and intra-annual variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3151–3180, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3151-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3151-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Steiner, G., Wagner, A. C., Kürten, A., Hansel, A., and Curtius, J.: Characterization of the mass-dependent transmission efficiency of a CIMS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1449–1460, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1449-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1449-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, W.: Data for “Measurement report: Molecular composition and volatility of gaseous organic compounds in a boreal forest – from volatile organic compounds to highly oxygenated organic molecules”, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4925730" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4925730</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, W., Saathoff, H., Shen, X., Ramisetty, R., Leisner, T., and Mohr, C.:
Chemical characterization of highly functionalized organonitrates
contributing to night-time organic aerosol mass loadings and particle
growth, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 1165–1174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05826" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05826</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, W., Saathoff, H., Shen, X., Ramisetty, R., Leisner, T., and Mohr, C.: Seasonal characteristics of organic aerosol chemical composition and volatility in Stuttgart, Germany, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11687–11700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11687-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11687-2019</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hyttinen, N., Otkjaer, R. V., Iyer, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Rissanen, M. P.,
Wennberg, P. O., and Kurtén, T.: Computational comparison of different
reagent ions in the chemical ionization of oxidized multifunctional
compounds, J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 269–279,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b10015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b10015</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate change 2013: The physical scientific basis, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK, 622–623, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Isaacman-VanWertz, G. and Aumont, B.: Impact of organic molecular structure on the estimation of atmospherically relevant physicochemical parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6541–6563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6541-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6541-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Junninen, H., Ehn, M., Petäjä, T., Luosujärvi, L., Kotiaho, T., Kostiainen, R., Rohner, U., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Kulmala, M., and Worsnop, D. R.: A high-resolution mass spectrometer to measure atmospheric ion composition, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1039–1053, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1039-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1039-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kaser, L., Karl, T., Guenther, A., Graus, M., Schnitzhofer, R., Turnipseed, A., Fischer, L., Harley, P., Madronich, M., Gochis, D., Keutsch, F. N., and Hansel, A.: Undisturbed and disturbed above canopy ponderosa pine emissions: PTR-TOF-MS measurements and MEGAN 2.1 model results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11935–11947, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11935-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11935-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., Frege, C., Gordon, H., Williamson,
C., Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., Tröstl, J.,
Nieminen, T., Ortega, I. K., Wagner, R., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bernhammer,
A.-K., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Chen, X. M., Craven, J.,
Dias, A., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R.,
Hakala, J., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Kim,
J., Krapf, M., Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V.,
Mathot, S., Molteni, U., Onnela, A., Peräkylä, O., Piel, F.,
Petäjä, T., Praplan, A. P., Pringle, K., Rap, A., Richards, N. A.
D., Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger,
S., Scott, C. E., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov,
Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, A. C.,
Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P. L.,
Zhang, X., Hansel, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Worsnop, D. R.,
Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Carslaw, K. S., and Curtius, J.: Ion-induced
nucleation of pure biogenic particles, Nature, 533, 521–526, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Krechmer, J., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Koss, A., Hutterli, M., Stoermer, C.,
Deming, B., Kimmel, J., Warneke, C., Holzinger, R., Jayne, J., Worsnop, D.,
Fuhrer, K., Gonin, M., and de Gouw, J.: Evaluation of a new reagent-ion
source and focusing ion-molecule reactor for use in proton-transfer-reaction
mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 90, 12011–12018, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02641" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02641</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Toivonen, A., Mäkelä, J. M., and Laaksonen, A.:
Analysis of the growth of nucleation mode particles observed in boreal
forest, Tellus B, 50, 449–462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v50i5.16229" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v50i5.16229</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E.,
Nieminen, T., Petäjä, T., Sipilä, M., Schobesberger, S.,
Rantala, P., Franchin, A., Jokinen, T., Järvinen, E.,
Äijälä, M., Kangasluoma, J., Hakala, J., Aalto, P. P., Paasonen,
P., Mikkilä, J., Vanhanen, J., Aalto, J., Hakola, H., Makkonen, U.,
Ruuskanen, T., Mauldin III, R. L., Duplissy, J., Vehkamäki, H.,
Bäck, J., Kortelainen, A., Riipinen, I., Kurtén, T., Johnston, M.
V., Smith, J. N., Ehn, M., Mentel, T. F., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A.,
Kerminen, V.-M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Direct observations of atmospheric
aerosol nucleation, Science, 339, 943–946, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227385</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kürten, A., Rondo, L., Ehrhart, S., and Curtius, J.: Calibration of a
chemical ionization mass spectrometer for the measurement of gaseous
sulfuric acid, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 6375–6386,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp212123n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp212123n</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, B. H., Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Lee,
L., Romer, P., Cohen, R. C., Iyer, S., Kurtén, T., Hu, W. W., Day, D.
A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Guo, H. Y.,
Weber, R. J., Wild, R. J., Brown, S. S., Koss, A., de Gouw, J., Olson, K.,
Goldstein, A. H., Seco, R., Kim, S., McAvey, K., Shepson, P. B., Starn, T.,
Baumann, K., Edgerton, E. S., Liu, J. M., Shilling, J. E., Miller, D. O.,
Brune, W., Schobesberger, S., D'Ambro, E. L., and Thornton, J. A.: Highly
functionalized organic nitrates in the southeast United States: Contribution
to secondary organic aerosol and reactive nitrogen budgets, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 113, 1516–1521, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508108113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508108113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Li, H., Riva, M., Rantala, P., Heikkinen, L., Daellenbach, K., Krechmer, J. E., Flaud, P.-M., Worsnop, D., Kulmala, M., Villenave, E., Perraudin, E., Ehn, M., and Bianchi, F.: Terpenes and their oxidation products in the French Landes forest: insights from Vocus PTR-TOF measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1941–1959, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1941-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1941-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Li, H., Canagaratna, M. R., Riva, M., Rantala, P., Zhang, Y., Thomas, S., Heikkinen, L., Flaud, P.-M., Villenave, E., Perraudin, E., Worsnop, D., Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Bianchi, F.: Atmospheric organic vapors in two European pine forests measured by a Vocus PTR-TOF: insights into monoterpene and sesquiterpene oxidation processes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4123–4147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4123-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4123-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.: Molecular corridors and parameterizations of volatility in the chemical evolution of organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3327–3344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3327-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3327-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Liao, L., Dal Maso, M., Taipale, R., Rinne, J., Ehn, M., Junninen, H.,
Äijälä, M., Nieminen, T., Alekseychik, P., Hulkkonen, M.,
Worsnop, D. R., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.: Monoterpene pollution
episodes in a forest environment: indication of anthropogenic origin and
association with aerosol particles, Boreal Environ. Res., 16, 288–303, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Mohr, C., Ehn, M., Rubach, F., Kleist, E., Wildt, J., Mentel, Th. F., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Worsnop, D., and Thornton, J. A.: A novel method for online analysis of gas and particle composition: description and evaluation of a Filter Inlet for Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 983–1001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-983-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-983-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Asmi, E., Gagné, S., Häkkinen, S., Lehtipalo, K., Aalto, P., Vana, M., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Hõrrak, U., Plass-Dülmer, C., Stange, G., Kiss, G., Hoffer, A., Törő, N., Moerman, M., Henzing, B., de Leeuw, G., Brinkenberg, M., Kouvarakis, G. N., Bougiatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Arneth, A., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tarozzi, L., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Birmili, W., Sonntag, A., Wiedensohler, A., Boulon, J., Sellegri, K., Laj, P., Gysel, M., Bukowiecki, N., Weingartner, E., Wehrle, G., Laaksonen, A., Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.: EUCAARI ion spectrometer measurements at 12 European sites – analysis of new particle formation events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7907–7927, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Massoli, P., Stark, H., Canagaratna, M. R., Krechmer, J. E., Xu, L., Ng, N.
L., Mauldin, R. L., Yan, C., Kimmel, J., Misztal, P. K., Jimenez, J. L.,
Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Ambient measurements of highly oxidized
gas-phase molecules during the Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS)
2013, Acs Earth Space Chem., 2, 653–672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00028</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Mohr, C., Thornton, J. A., Heitto, A., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Lutz, A.,
Riipinen, I., Hong, J., Donahue, N. M., Hallquist, M., Petaja, T., Kulmala,
M., and Yli-Juuti, T.: Molecular identification of organic vapors driving
atmospheric nanoparticle growth, Nat. Commun., 10, 4442, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12473-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12473-2</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Molteni, U., Simon, M., Heinritzi, M., Hoyle, C. R., Bernhammer, A.-K.,
Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Dias, A., Duplissy, J., Frege,
C., Gordon, H., Heyn, C., Jokinen, T., Kürten, A., Lehtipalo, K.,
Makhmutov, V., Petäjä, T., Pieber, S. M., Praplan, A. P.,
Schobesberger, S., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J.,
Wagner, A. C., Wagner, R., Williamson, C., Yan, C., Baltensperger, U.,
Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Hansel, A., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Worsnop,
D. R., and Dommen, J.: Formation of highly oxygenated organic molecules from
<i>α</i>-pinene ozonolysis: chemical characteristics, mechanism, and
kinetic model development, Acs Earth Space Chem., 3, 873–883,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00035</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Nash, D. G., Baer, T., and Johnston, M. V.: Aerosol mass spectrometry: an
introductory review, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 258, 2–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.017</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Nel, A.: Air pollution-related illness: effects of particles, Science, 308,
804–806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108752" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108752</a> 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L.,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y. L., and Jayne,
J. T.: An aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) for routine monitoring
of the composition and mass concentrations of ambient aerosol,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 780–794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Pankow, J. F. and Asher, W. E.: SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of multifunctional organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2773–2796, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Rissanen, M. P., Mikkilä, J., Iyer, S., and Hakala, J.: Multi-scheme chemical ionization inlet (MION) for fast switching of reagent ion chemistry in atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS) applications, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6635–6646, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6635-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6635-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Riva, M., Rantala, P., Krechmer, J. E., Peräkylä, O., Zhang, Y., Heikkinen, L., Garmash, O., Yan, C., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D., and Ehn, M.: Evaluating the performance of five different chemical ionization techniques for detecting gaseous oxygenated organic species, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2403–2421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2403-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2403-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Rückerl, R., Schneider, A., Breitner, S., Cyrys, J., and Peters, A.:
Health effects of particulate air pollution: a review of epidemiological
evidence, Inhal. Toxicol., 23, 555–592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2011.593587" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2011.593587</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Sanchez, J., Tanner, D. J., Chen, D., Huey, L. G., and Ng, N. L.: A new technique for the direct detection of HO2 radicals using bromide chemical ionization mass spectrometry (Br-CIMS): initial characterization, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 3851–3861, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3851-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3851-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Schervish, M. and Donahue, N. M.: Peroxy radical chemistry and the volatility basis set, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1183–1199, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1183-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1183-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Sekimoto, K., Li, S. M., Yuan, B., Koss, A., Coggon, M., Warneke, C., and de
Gouw, J.: Calculation of the sensitivity of proton-transfer-reaction mass
spectrometry (PTR-MS) for organic trace gases using molecular properties,
Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 421, 71–94, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.006</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Simon, M., Dada, L., Heinritzi, M., Scholz, W., Stolzenburg, D., Fischer, L., Wagner, A. C., Kürten, A., Rörup, B., He, X.-C., Almeida, J., Baalbaki, R., Baccarini, A., Bauer, P. S., Beck, L., Bergen, A., Bianchi, F., Bräkling, S., Brilke, S., Caudillo, L., Chen, D., Chu, B., Dias, A., Draper, D. C., Duplissy, J., El-Haddad, I., Finkenzeller, H., Frege, C., Gonzalez-Carracedo, L., Gordon, H., Granzin, M., Hakala, J., Hofbauer, V., Hoyle, C. R., Kim, C., Kong, W., Lamkaddam, H., Lee, C. P., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Mai, H., Manninen, H. E., Marie, G., Marten, R., Mentler, B., Molteni, U., Nichman, L., Nie, W., Ojdanic, A., Onnela, A., Partoll, E., Petäjä, T., Pfeifer, J., Philippov, M., Quéléver, L. L. J., Ranjithkumar, A., Rissanen, M. P., Schallhart, S., Schobesberger, S., Schuchmann, S., Shen, J., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tauber, C., Tham, Y. J., Tomé, A. R., Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, R., Wang, M., Wang, D. S., Wang, Y., Weber, S. K., Wu, Y., Xiao, M., Yan, C., Ye, P., Ye, Q., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Zhou, X., Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., Flagan, R. C., Hansel, A., Kulmala, M., Volkamer, R., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., Kirkby, J., and Curtius, J.: Molecular understanding of new-particle formation from <i>α</i>-pinene between −50 and +25&thinsp;°C, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9183–9207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9183-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9183-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Sindelarova, K., Granier, C., Bouarar, I., Guenther, A., Tilmes, S., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Kuhn, U., Stefani, P., and Knorr, W.: Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over the last 30 years, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9317–9341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Stolzenburg, D., Fischer, L., Vogel, A. L., Heinritzi, M., Schervish, M.,
Simon, M., Wagner, A. C., Dada, L., Ahonen, L. R., Amorim, A., Baccarini,
A., Bauer, P. S., Baumgartner, B., Bergen, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner,
M., Brilke, S., Mazon, S. B., Chen, D. X., Dias, A., Draper, D. C.,
Duplissy, J., Haddad, I., Finkenzeller, H., Frege, C., Fuchs, C., Garmash,
O., Gordon, H., He, X., Helm, J., Hofbauer, V., Hoyle, C. R., Kim, C.,
Kirkby, J., Kontkanen, J., Kürten, A., Lampilahti, J., Lawler, M.,
Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Mai, H., Mathot, S., Mentler, B., Molteni, U.,
Nie, W., Nieminen, T., Nowak, J. B., Ojdanic, A., Onnela, A., Passananti,
M., Petäjä, T., Quéléver, L. L. J., Rissanen, M. P.,
Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Tauber, C., Tomé, A., Wagner, R., Wang, M.,
Weitz, L., Wimmer, D., Xiao, M., Yan, C., Ye, P., Zha, Q., Baltensperger,
U., Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Flagan, R. C., Kulmala, M., Smith, J. N.,
Worsnop, D. R., Hansel, A., Donahue, N. M., and Winkler, P. M.: Rapid growth
of organic aerosol nanoparticles over a wide tropospheric temperature range,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 9122–9127, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807604115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807604115</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Sullivan, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: Recent advances in our understanding of
atmospheric chemistry and climate made possible by on-line aerosol analysis
instrumentation, Anal. Chem., 77, 3861–3885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050716i" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050716i</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Tröstl, J., Chuang, W. K., Gordon, H., Heinritzi, M., Yan, C., Molteni,
U., Ahlm, L., Frege, C., Bianchi, F., Wagner, R., Simon, M., Lehtipalo, K.,
Williamson, C., Craven, J. S., Duplissy, J., Adamov, A., Almeida, J.,
Bernhammer, A.-K., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Dias, A., Ehrhart, S.,
Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R., Gysel, M., Hansel, A.,
Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kim,
J., Krapf, M., Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lawler, M., Leiminger, M.,
Mathot, S., Möhler, O., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T.,
Piel, F. M., Miettinen, P., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N.,
Schobesberger, S., Sengupta, K., Sipilä, M., Smith, J. N., Steiner, G.,
Tomè, A., Virtanen, A., Wagner, A. C., Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D.,
Winkler, P. M., Ye, P. L., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Kirkby,
J., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., and
Baltensperger, U.: The role of low-volatility organic compounds in initial
particle growth in the atmosphere, Nature, 533, 527–531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18271" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18271</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Viggiano, A. A., Seeley, J. V., Mundis, P. L., Williamson, J. S., and
Morris, R. A.: Rate constants for the reactions of XO<sub>3</sub>-(H<sub>2</sub>O)(<i>n</i>) (<i>X</i>&thinsp; = &thinsp;C, HC, and N) and NO<sub>3</sub>-(HNO<sub>3</sub>)(<i>n</i>) with H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>: implications for atmospheric detection of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 101, 8275–8278,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp971768h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp971768h</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, M. Y., Chen, D. X., Xiao, M., Ye, Q., Stolzenburg, D., Hofbauer, V.,
Ye, P. L., Vogel, A. L., Mauldin III, R. L., Amorim, A., Baccarini, A.,
Baumgartner, B., Brilke, S., Dada, L., Dias, A., Duplissy, J., Finkenzeller,
H., Garmash, O., He, X. C., Hoyle, C. R., Kim, C., Kvashnin, A., Lehtipalo,
K., Fischer, L., Molteni, U., Petäjä, T., Pospisilova, V.,
Quéléver, L. L. J., Rissanen, M., Simon, M., Tauber, C., Tomé,
A., Wagner, A. C., Weitz, L., Volkamer, R., Winkler, P. M., Kirkby, J.,
Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., El-Haddad, I.,
and Donahue, N. M.: Photo-oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons produces
low-volatility organic compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 7911–7921,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02100</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, J., Crowley, J., Fischer, H., Harder, H., Martinez, M., Petäjä, T., Rinne, J., Bäck, J., Boy, M., Dal Maso, M., Hakala, J., Kajos, M., Keronen, P., Rantala, P., Aalto, J., Aaltonen, H., Paatero, J., Vesala, T., Hakola, H., Levula, J., Pohja, T., Herrmann, F., Auld, J., Mesarchaki, E., Song, W., Yassaa, N., Nölscher, A., Johnson, A. M., Custer, T., Sinha, V., Thieser, J., Pouvesle, N., Taraborrelli, D., Tang, M. J., Bozem, H., Hosaynali-Beygi, Z., Axinte, R., Oswald, R., Novelli, A., Kubistin, D., Hens, K., Javed, U., Trawny, K., Breitenberger, C., Hidalgo, P. J., Ebben, C. J., Geiger, F. M., Corrigan, A. L., Russell, L. M., Ouwersloot, H. G., Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., Ganzeveld, L., Vogel, A., Beck, M., Bayerle, A., Kampf, C. J., Bertelmann, M., Köllner, F., Hoffmann, T., Valverde, J., González, D., Riekkola, M.-L., Kulmala, M., and Lelieveld, J.: The summertime Boreal forest field measurement intensive (HUMPPA-COPEC-2010): an overview of meteorological and chemical influences, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10599–10618, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10599-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10599-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, C., Nie, W., Äijälä, M., Rissanen, M. P., Canagaratna, M. R., Massoli, P., Junninen, H., Jokinen, T., Sarnela, N., Häme, S. A. K., Schobesberger, S., Canonaco, F., Yao, L., Prévôt, A. S. H., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Sipilä, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Ehn, M.: Source characterization of highly oxidized multifunctional compounds in a boreal forest environment using positive matrix factorization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12715–12731, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12715-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12715-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, Q., Wang, M. Y., Hofbauer, V., Stolzenburg, D., Chen, D. X., Schervish,
M., Vogel, A., Mauldin, R. L., Baalbaki, R., Brilke, S., Dada, L., Dias, A.,
Duplissy, J., El Haddad, I., Finkenzeller, H., Fischer, L., He, X. C., Kim,
C., Kürten, A., Lamkaddam, H., Lee, C. P., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M.,
Manninen, H. E., Marten, R., Mentler, B., Partoll, E., Petäjä, T.,
Rissanen, M., Schobesberger, S., Schuchmann, S., Simon, M., Tham, Y. J.,
Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Wagner, A. C., Wang, Y. H., Wu, Y. S., Xiao, M.,
Baltensperger, U., Curtius, J., Flagan, R., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M.,
Volkamer, R., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D., and Donahue, N. M.: Molecular
composition and volatility of nucleated particles from alpha-pinene
oxidation between −50&thinsp;°C and +25&thinsp;°C, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 12357–12365, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03265" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03265</a>, 2019.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, B., Koss, A. R., Warneke, C., Coggon, M., Sekimoto, K., and de Gouw,
J. A.: Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry: applications in
atmospheric sciences, Chem. Rev., 117, 13187–13229, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00325" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00325</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Zha, Q., Yan, C., Junninen, H., Riva, M., Sarnela, N., Aalto, J., Quéléver, L., Schallhart, S., Dada, L., Heikkinen, L., Peräkylä, O., Zou, J., Rose, C., Wang, Y., Mammarella, I., Katul, G., Vesala, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Bianchi, F., and Ehn, M.: Vertical characterization of highly oxygenated molecules (HOMs) below and above a boreal forest canopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17437–17450, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17437-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17437-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., McVay, R. C., Huang, D. D., Dalleska, N. F., Aumont, B., Flagan,
R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Formation and evolution of molecular products in
<i>α</i>-pinene secondary organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112,
14168–14173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517742112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517742112</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Lambe, A. T., Upshur, M. A., Brooks, W. A., Beì, A. G., Thomson,
R. J., Geiger, F. M., Surratt, J. D., Zhang, Z. F., Gold, A., Graf, S.,
Cubison, M. J., Groessl, M., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Canagaratna,
M. R.: Highly oxygenated multifunctional compounds in <i>α</i>-pinene
secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5932–5940, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06588" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06588</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Thornton, J. A., and Pye, H. O. T.: Quantitative constraints on
autoxidation and dimer formation from direct probing of monoterpene-derived
peroxy radical chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 12142–12147,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812147115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812147115</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
