<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-7235-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Complex refractive indices in the ultraviolet and visible spectral region
for highly absorbing non-spherical biomass burning aerosol</article-title><alt-title>Complex refractive indices for biomass burning aerosol</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Complex refractive indices for biomass burning aerosol}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C. C. Womack et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Womack</surname><given-names>Caroline C.</given-names></name>
          <email>caroline.womack@noaa.gov</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7101-9054</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Manfred</surname><given-names>Katherine M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6850-1560</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Wagner</surname><given-names>Nicholas L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff6">
          <name><surname>Adler</surname><given-names>Gabriela</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff7">
          <name><surname>Franchin</surname><given-names>Alessandro</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff8">
          <name><surname>Lamb</surname><given-names>Kara D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6883-3285</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Middlebrook</surname><given-names>Ann M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2984-6304</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Schwarz</surname><given-names>Joshua P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9123-2223</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Brock</surname><given-names>Charles A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4033-4668</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>Steven S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7477-9078</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Washenfelder</surname><given-names>Rebecca A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences,
University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Chemical Sciences Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Boulder, CO 80305, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309,
USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry,
University of York, York, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>b</label><institution>now at: Ball Aerospace, Broomfield, CO 80021, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>c</label><institution>now at: Breezometer, Haifa, Israel</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>d</label><institution>now at: the National Center for Atmospheric Research,
Boulder, CO 80305, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>e</label><institution>now at: Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia
University, New York, NY 10027, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Caroline C. Womack (caroline.womack@noaa.gov)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>7235</fpage><lpage>7252</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>November</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>24</day><month>November</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e221">Biomass burning aerosol is a major source of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and significantly affects Earth's radiative budget. The magnitude of its
radiative effect is poorly quantified due to uncertainty in the optical
properties of aerosol formed from biomass burning. Using a broadband cavity-enhanced spectrometer with a recently increased spectral range (360–720 nm) coupled to a size-selecting aerosol inlet, we retrieve complex
refractive indices of aerosol throughout the near-ultraviolet and visible
spectral region. We demonstrate refractive index retrievals for two standard
aerosol samples: polystyrene latex spheres and ammonium sulfate. We then
retrieve refractive indices for biomass burning aerosol from 13 controlled
fires during the 2016 Missoula Fire Science Laboratory Study. We demonstrate
that the technique is highly sensitive to the accuracy of the aerosol size
distribution method and find that while we can constrain the optical
properties of brown carbon aerosol for many fires, fresh smoke dominated by
fractal-like black carbon aerosol presents unique challenges and is not
well-represented by Mie theory. For the 13 fires, we show that the accuracy
of Mie theory retrievals decreases as the fraction of black carbon mass
increases. At 475 nm, the average refractive index is 1.635 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.056</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and at 365 nm, the average refractive index is 1.605
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.041</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.038</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.074</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e317">Biomass burning is one of the largest global contributors to accumulation-mode aerosol mass, with estimated emissions of 15–57 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Pan et al., 2020). In the United States, biomass
burning is calculated to contribute 2.4 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol,
which accounts for one-third of the primary aerosol sources (Watson, 2002;
Wiedinmyer et al., 2006). In the western US, increased wildfire frequency,
wildfire duration, and active fire season have been associated with
increased spring and summer temperatures (Westerling et al., 2006;
Dennison et al., 2014). Biomass burning aerosol plays an important role in
Earth's radiative budget by absorbing and scattering light
(Boucher et al., 2013). Biomass
burning smoke contains a complex mixture of particles with varying
composition, morphology, size, and refractive index. The two major absorbing
components are fractal-like graphitic material (black carbon; BC) and
light-absorbing spherical organic aerosol (brown carbon; BrC), with smaller
contributions from dust (Li et al., 2003; Pósfai et al., 2003; China
et al., 2013). One recent study estimated that biomass burning contributes
27 % of black carbon emissions and 62 % of primary organic aerosol
globally (Wiedinmyer et al., 2011).</p>
      <?pagebreak page7236?><p id="d1e353"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The interaction of an aerosol particle with light can be calculated from its
size, morphology, mixing state, and complex refractive index (RI). The RI is
an intrinsic physical property of the particle and is described as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Moosmüller
et al., 2009; Moise et al., 2015). Light scattering by spherical particles
is well described by Mie theory, which is a set of solutions to Maxwell's
equations representing the scattering of light by a homogeneous sphere with
dimensions similar to the wavelength of the radiation (Moosmüller and
Arnott, 2009; Moosmüller et al., 2009). Many global models and satellite
retrieval algorithms assume atmospheric aerosol particles are predominately
spherical and calculate total aerosol extinction using Mie theory with a
small set of constant RIs for different aerosol types (Liao et al., 2003;
Levy et al., 2007; Omar et al., 2009; Lamarque et al., 2012). These RIs are
often determined experimentally at a few wavelengths (Nakayama et al.,
2010; Zhang et al., 2016) and extrapolated to the full solar spectrum.</p>
      <p id="d1e375">Simple assumptions of sphericity and wavelength-independent RI are not
accurate for biomass burning particles, which consist of BC with
complex morphology
(Bond et al.,
2013) and BrC with wavelength-dependent RIs (Washenfelder et
al., 2013; Flores et al., 2014b; Laskin et al., 2015; Bluvshtein et al.,
2017). The fractal-like agglomerates of highly absorbing black carbon are
known to be poorly represented as spheres (Forrest and
Witten, 1979) and are better described by more complex optical equations,
such as Rayleigh–Debye–Gans (Sorensen, 2001; Manfred et al., 2018).
Accurate measurements of the size distributions, morphology, and
wavelength-dependent refractive indices of biomass burning aerosol are
important to better model their climate forcing.</p>
      <p id="d1e378">One technique to measure wavelength-dependent RIs is broadband cavity-enhanced spectroscopy (BBCES), which combines a broadband light source with
highly reflective mirrors to measure total light extinction by particles or
gas-phase species at multiple wavelengths simultaneously (Fiedler et al.,
2003; Washenfelder et al., 2008; Varma et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2017). The
absorption and scattering of an aerosol population can be determined by
making multiple size-selected measurements of extinction and using Mie
theory to retrieve the RI (Washenfelder et al., 2013; Flores et al.,
2014a; Zhao et al., 2017; He et al., 2018). This method has been used
successfully for retrievals of RI in the near-ultraviolet at 360–420 nm
using LEDs (Washenfelder et al., 2013; Flores et al., 2014a) and for
spectral regions as broad as 380–650 nm using laser-driven arc lamps
(He et al., 2018; Li et al., 2020). Complex RIs have been reported for
standard aerosol samples, such as nigrosin and Suwannee River Fulvic Acid
(Washenfelder et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2017), and for aged organic
aerosol (Flores et al., 2014a, b; He et al., 2018; Li
et al., 2020). However, these measurements have all been conducted with
spherical, homogeneous particles generated in laboratory or chamber
experiments. This method has not been previously demonstrated for
measurements of complex populations of non-spherical, highly absorbing black
and brown carbon that are representative of biomass burning aerosol.</p>
      <p id="d1e382">In this paper, we determined complex refractive indices for biomass burning
aerosol across a very broadband region from 360–720 nm. We measured
wildfire smoke samples from representative fuels and burn conditions at the
Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Manfred et al., 2018; Selimovic et
al., 2018). We used the broadband extinction measurements and two
independent measurements of the aerosol size distribution together with a
retrieval algorithm and several theoretical scattering models to determine
complex refractive indices. We validate the retrieval algorithm with
spherical, monodisperse populations of polystyrene latex spheres and
polydisperse populations of ammonium sulfate. We analyze smoke from 13 fires
at the Fire Sciences Laboratory, present detailed examples where the
retrieval algorithm can and cannot be used to accurately characterize the
complex refractive index, and discuss the implications for remote-sensing
retrievals.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Overview of the Fire Sciences Laboratory 2016 study</title>
      <p id="d1e400">The Fire Influence on Regional and Global Environments Experiment (FIREX)
2016 study was conducted at the U.S. Forest Service's Missoula Fire Sciences
Laboratory during October–November 2016 (Manfred et al., 2018;
Selimovic et al., 2018). The Fire Science Laboratory contains a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> indoor combustion room for controlled burns
(McMeeking et al., 2009; Selimovic et al., 2018). The measurements
reported here are for “room” burns, where instruments sampled well-mixed
smoke from the combustion room. First, dry fuels weighing 0.24–4.4 kg
were placed on a ceramic fuel bed and ignited by a heating plate to produce
a small, controlled burn that lasted several minutes
(Selimovic et al., 2018). The smoke became well-mixed in the combustion room within 15–20 min and persisted under
steady-state, low-light conditions for 3–4 h with minimal dilution and
wall loss (Stockwell et al., 2014).
Fuels were representative of western US wildfires and included ponderosa
pine (<italic>Pinus ponderosa</italic>), lodgepole pine (<italic>Pinus contorta</italic>), Douglas fir (<italic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</italic>), Engelmann spruce (<italic>Picea engelmannii</italic>), subalpine
fir (<italic>Abies lasiocarpa</italic>), manzanita (<italic>Arctostaphylos</italic>), chamise (<italic>Adenostoma fasciculatum</italic>), juniper (<italic>Juniperus</italic>), and sage (<italic>Artemisia</italic>)
(Selimovic et al., 2018). A shared aerosol inlet
was connected to the combustion room, and it provided flow to a
size-selected inlet and the BBCES instrument, as described below.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page7237?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Broadband cavity-enhanced spectrometer for aerosol extinction at
360--720\,nm}?><title>Broadband cavity-enhanced spectrometer for aerosol extinction at
360–720 nm</title>
      <p id="d1e460">The optical system shown in Fig. 1a is a modified version of the two-channel
instrument used previously to measure broadband aerosol extinction at 355–420 nm with two LEDs (Attwood et al., 2014; Washenfelder et al., 2015).
The light source, optical filters, cavity mirrors, and spectrometer grating
were replaced to measure aerosol extinction over a very broadband region,
covering 360–385 and 400–720 nm.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e465">A schematic of the BBCES instrument and inlet at the Fire Sciences Laboratory. <bold>(a)</bold>
The optical components of the BBCES instrument include a laser-driven arc
lamp, off-axis parabola, colored glass filters, dichroic beam splitter, two
BBCES cavities, and a grating spectrometer. <bold>(b)</bold> The automated flow system
developed for the Fire Sciences Laboratory. Aerosol is size-selected by a DMA, with the
number concentration continuously measured by a CPC and the size
distribution periodically measured by an OPC. The flow is evenly divided
between the two BBCES channels and the CRDS channel. An automated
two-position valve allows flow to be directed through a filter to measure
particle-free air, and a second two-position valve allows the introduction
of calibration gases. <bold>(c)</bold> The common inlet shared by multiple aerosol
instruments at the Fire Sciences Laboratory, including the SP2 and the AMS. Smoke was
sampled at 2 vlpm through an impactor (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m cut-point), silica gel dryer,
and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> scrubber before traveling through a bypass channel or
thermodenuder. A two-way valve alternately directed fresh and denuded
aerosol to the BBCES and CRDS at 10 min intervals.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/7235/2021/acp-21-7235-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e500">We used a single laser-driven white-light source (EQ-99FC LDLS; Energetiq,
Woburn, MA, USA), containing a continuous-wave laser at 974 nm that pumps a
Xenon plasma and outputs a broad spectrum from 170–2100 nm
(Islam et al., 2013). The light source was
temperature-controlled to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and purged with N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
to eliminate O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production (Washenfelder et al.,
2016). The light was transmitted by fiber-optic to an off-axis parabola with
a 0.36 numerical aperture (RC04SMA-F01; Thorlabs, Newton, MA, USA) for
collimation and coupling into the optical cavities. Two colored glass
filters (WG345 and WG320) were used to remove UV wavelengths shorter than
345 nm. A dichroic long-pass filter with a 400 nm cut point (69–897; Edmund
Optics, Barrington, NJ, USA) divided the light before it was passively
coupled to the two optical cavities. Additional colored glass filters and
a custom interference filter (MLD Technologies LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA)
eliminated out-of-band wavelengths.</p>
      <p id="d1e541">The optical cavities consisted of two pairs of 2.5 cm diameter, 1 m radius of curvature plano-concave mirrors with a high-reflectivity coating covering
360–385 nm (Advanced Thin Films, Boulder, CO, USA) and 400–720 nm (MLD
Technologies LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA). The broadband reflectivity of the
visible mirrors was achieved with multiple layers of thin film coatings
applied by ion beam sputtering to the super-polished substrate. Although the
visible mirrors span a very broad range with high reflectivity (0.9993–0.9999), their losses vary strongly as a function of wavelength (Fig. S1)
(He et al., 2018), due to the coating properties and
possible contributions from surface roughness, interface roughness, and
internal defects. The mirrors were mounted in stainless steel mounts, at
either end of a 101.5 cm long aluminum flow cell (2.21 cm i.d.) with inlets
for the aerosol flow and mirror purge flows. The broadband light exiting
each cavity was collected by an F/3.1 lens, coupled to a bifurcated fiber-optic bundle, and imaged linearly onto the entrance slit of a grating
spectrometer (IsoPlane-160; Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ, USA). The
spectrometer contained a 300 grooves mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grating with 300 nm blaze (centered at 507 nm with 290–724 nm bandwidth) and a 16-bit back-illuminated 2048 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 512 pixel charge-coupled device (CCD) detector (PIXIS 2kBUV; Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ, USA).
During data acquisition, individual spectra were acquired with 0.3 s
integration time using the physical shutter of the IsoPlane spectrometer.
The CCD readout time was 0.57 s, and so a full spectrum was taken every 0.87 s. Narrow emission lines from a Hg lamp were measured multiple times each
day to determine the wavelength calibration and spectral resolution (average
full width at half-maximum resolution of 1.4 nm between 360–720 nm).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Cavity ring-down spectrometer for aerosol extinction at 403\,nm}?><title>Cavity ring-down spectrometer for aerosol extinction at 403 nm</title>
      <p id="d1e572">A cavity ring-down spectrometer (CRDS) at 403 nm provided an extinction measurement
between the two BBCES channels at 360–385 and 400–720 nm and was
used as an independent validation of the BBCES extinction. The CRDS method
has been described previously (Fuchs et al., 2009) and was not
modified from Washenfelder et al. (2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Automated flow system</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>2.4.1</label><title>Aerosol size selection and size characterization</title>
      <p id="d1e590">The custom automated inlet for aerosol size selection is shown in Fig. 1b.
The materials and geometry of the flow system were chosen to maximize
particle transmission and minimize inertial losses. The BBCES provides a
direct measurement of wavelength-dependent aerosol extinction, but
retrievals of complex RIs require extinction measurements of two or more
size-selected aerosol populations with consistent composition
(Washenfelder et al., 2013). Particle size selection was
achieved with a custom-built differential mobility analyzer (DMA; now
available from Brechtel Manufacturing Inc, Hayward, CA, USA
(Knutson and Whitby, 1975)). In these experiments, the sample
flow through the DMA was 0.5 or 1 vlpm (volumetric L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), with a sheath : sample flow ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e629">As shown in Fig. 1b, the concentration and size distribution of the
size-selected aerosol were determined using two separate methods. The first
method was a condensation particle counter (CPC; 3022A, TSI Inc., Shoreview,
MN, USA), which sampled at a flow rate of 0.3 vlpm and measured the total
number of particles with a lower aerosol size cutoff of 7 nm. At regular
intervals, the DMA and CPC were operated as a scanning mobility particle
sizer (SMPS) to determine the aerosol size distribution by scanning the DMA
column voltage up and then down between 0–5000 V over 240 s and applying
an inversion algorithm (Twomey, 1975; Markowski, 1987). An instrument
transfer function was then used to calculate the particle size distribution
for each DMA set point. The inversion algorithm for the SMPS size
distribution is most accurate for spherical aerosol with well-known mobility
diameters. The second measurement of the particle size distribution was made
using an optical particle counter. The optical particle counter (OPC) used
here was a laser aerosol spectrometer (LAS 3340, TSI Inc., Shoreview, MN,
USA), which detects light scattered by individual particles intercepting a
633 nm laser beam and reports the signal for each<?pagebreak page7238?> particle in 100
logarithmically spaced diameter bins. A total flow of 0.06 vlpm was used.
During laboratory tests after the field campaign, we used a similar optical
particle counter with a 1054 nm laser (UHSAS, Droplet Measurement
Technologies, Longmont, CO, USA) because the LAS 3340 was not available.
Optical particle counters are designed to measure scattering, and the
mathematical interpretation of the signal for highly absorbing biomass
burning aerosols is described in detail in Sect. 3.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>2.4.2</label><title>BBCES and CRDS flow system</title>
      <p id="d1e640">As shown in Fig. 1b, the size-selected aerosol flow was diluted with 5.0 slpm (standard liters per minute) of dry, particle-free zero air after exiting the DMA. The resulting 6.0 slpm of diluted sample flow was directed to the BBCES and CRDS channels (2.0 slpm per channel). Each cavity was constructed of aluminum tubing (22.1 mm
i.d. for BBCES, 7.7 mm i.d. for CRDS), and all tubing between the DMA and the
optical cavities was made of stainless steel or flexible silicone tubing to
minimize electrostatic particle losses. To protect mirror cleanliness,
particle-free zero air flowed over each cavity mirror at a rate of 55–80 sccm.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7239?><p id="d1e643">Two automated two-position valves (MDM-060DT-3; Hanbay Inc, Pointe-Claire,
Quebec, Canada) allowed additional calibrations and zeros. The first
two-position valve rotated to direct the sample flow through an aerosol
filter, providing an aerosol-free reference measurement for the BBCES and
CRDS cavities. The second two-position valve allowed pure gases to be
introduced for periodic measurements. As shown in Fig. 1b, gas cylinders of
He, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, zero air (Norco, Inc., Missoula, MT, USA), and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Scott-Marrin, Inc., Riverside, CA, USA) were connected to automated
valves and a mass flow controller (MFC). Pure CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and He were used to
characterize the mirror reflectivity by filling the cavities and purge
volumes with each gas for 1.5 min at intervals of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h. Pure
zero air provided an aerosol-free extinction measurement, similar to the
filter method described above. The cylinder containing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppmv NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> provided additions of 0–72 ppbv NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for
flows of 0–100 sccm. Due to known discrepancies between the reported and
actual concentrations of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration tanks (Chilton et
al., 2005), this method was not used as a calibration but rather as an
assessment of long-term stability of the instrument with respect to the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> spectral features. When the two-position valve was rotated for
overflow of calibrant gas, the inlet sample flow and pressure were
maintained using an MFC and pump to minimize disturbances to
the DMA and other instruments.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Shared aerosol inlet</title>
      <p id="d1e758">The flow to the BBCES and CRDS channels was provided by a shared aerosol
inlet, shown in Fig. 1c. The shared aerosol inlet consisted of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m of 6.4 mm o.d. copper tubing connected to an inertial
impactor with 50 % cut point at an aerodynamic diameter of 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m (TE296,
Tisch Environmental, Cleves, OH), a silica gel dryer, an activated carbon
denuder to remove NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Washenfelder et al., 2015),
and three available thermodenuders. The 2.0 volumetric L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (vlpm) flow
from the burn room was evenly split between one of the thermodenuders and a
bypass channel. An automated two-position valve (Hanbay Inc, Pointe-Claire,
Quebec, Canada) alternately directed 1.0 vlpm of thermodenuded and 1.0 vlpm
of fresh smoke to the BBCES aerosol inlet and to a mixing volume with
dilution for a collection of other aerosol instruments (Manfred et al.,
2018; Adler et al., 2019). The DMA, valves, MFCs, and all other components
shown in Fig. 1 were controlled by custom LabVIEW software and synchronized
to the timing of the two-position valve shown in Fig. 1c as part of the NOAA
shared aerosol inlet.</p>
      <p id="d1e809">The inlet apparatus included three separate thermodenuders to enable
comparison between different temperatures, but this paper reports data from
only one. This denuder consisted of an 80 cm screen tube (1.3 cm i.d.) wrapped
in activated charcoal fabric to remove volatilized organic components. The
first 40 cm was heated to 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and the remaining 40 cm served
as a cool-down region. With a flow rate of 1.0 vlpm, the calculated
residence time was 3.2 s and Reynolds number was 114. The denuders were
similar to the design of Huffman et al. (2008), with the
major difference that the heated section had charcoal fabric to absorb the
volatilized species. The throughput efficiency was found to be less than
unity (86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 % for particles between 100 and 300 nm) due to
thermophoretic wall losses, but the analysis of the aerosol size-independent
RI, which is an intrinsic property of the aerosol (Moise et al.,
2015), is largely unaffected by these losses. We therefore do not make any
corrections to these data.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Black carbon and organic aerosol measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e837">Additional instruments sampled from the shared aerosol inlet's mixing
volume, shown in Fig. 1c, and those data were used to assess the fraction of
black carbon in the total aerosol mass loading of smoke from each fire. A
single-particle soot photometer (SP2; Droplet Measurement Technologies,
Longmont, CO, USA) measured the concentration of refractory black carbon
aerosol, rBC (Schwarz et al., 2006, 2008). The rBC mass
concentration was only retrieved in the mass range corresponding to
particles with a volume equivalent diameter of 90–550 nm, assuming a void-free
density of 1.8 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This range typically covers 90 % or more of the
accumulation-mode rBC emitted from wildfires. Refractory black carbon has
been shown to be experimentally consistent with elemental carbon measured
after a thermal denuder within 15 % (Kondo et al.,
2011). The uncertainty of the black carbon mass at this concentration is
30 %. A compact time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (c-TOF AMS;
Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, MA, USA) measured organic aerosol (OA) mass
(Bahreini et al., 2008, 2009). The uncertainty of the
OA mass is typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % due to standard
uncertainties in AMS measurements
(Bahreini et al., 2009) but was
greater for biomass burning aerosol at the Fire Sciences Laboratory because
of additional variability in aerosol volatility due to dilution of the dense
smoke. Therefore, we use relative AMS masses in this analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>BBCES instrument operation at the Fire Sciences Laboratory</title>
      <?pagebreak page7240?><p id="d1e870">Each measurement day at the Fire Sciences Laboratory included two controlled
burns, with 3–4 h of sampling of each burn. The instruments and inlet
components were turned on at least 1 h prior to the first burn. Each sample
cycle required 30 min and began with measurements of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and He to
determine the BBCES mirror reflectivity, followed by measurement of the dark
noise of the CCD detector with the physical shutter closed. During these
BBCES calibrations, the size distribution of the aerosol sample was measured
by SMPS. Next, the BBCES and CRDS measured fresh and denuded (250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
aerosol with mobility diameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 150, 225, 300, 375, and 450 nm for 2 min each (20 min total). The aerosol mass loading was very high in the burn
room (typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) but was reduced by a factor of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the DMA and the dilution flows prior to measurement
by the BBCES. Therefore the 2 min averaging time ensured sufficient
precision in the spectra and the particle counting, particularly at the
larger diameter set points. These DMA diameter set points were chosen to span
the observed aerosol size distribution of the smoke. Filtered sample air was
measured before and after each set of five measurements. The five mobility
diameter measurements allowed RI to be retrieved once every 10 min,
alternating between fresh and denuded biomass burning smoke. Between the two
daily fires, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> additions were made to assess the spectrometer
stability. The spectrometer wavelength and resolution were calibrated with
the output of a Hg lamp before the first burn, between the first and second
burns, and after the second burn.</p>
      <p id="d1e944">After the FIREX 2016 study, the BBCES extinction measurements and complex RI
retrievals were validated using standard samples of polystyrene latex
spheres (PSLs; Nanosphere size standards, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.,
Waltham, MA, USA) and ammonium sulfate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
For these measurements, the aerosols were generated using a custom-built
atomizer, and dilution make-up flow was provided by scrubbed and dried air
from a compressor. Five or six aerosol sizes were selected, spanning a
similar range to those sampled during FIREX. The sampling scheme shown in
Fig. 1a and b remained the same, but the shared inlet shown in Fig. 1c was
not used. Particle-free air and mirror reflectivity measurements were
performed before and after each set of aerosol sizes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Data analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Determination of aerosol optical extinction and mirror reflectivity</title>
      <p id="d1e963">The aerosol optical extinction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, can be determined from
the observed change in light intensity in the cavity according to
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M55" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.1}{9.1}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rayleigh</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ZA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ZA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is wavelength, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio of the physical cell
length to the sample cell length, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measured mirror
reflectivity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the physical cell length, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rayleigh</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ZA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Rayleigh scattering of zero air,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ZA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference intensity spectrum, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
measured intensity spectrum (Washenfelder et al., 2013).
The extinction cross section, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is defined as the optical
extinction divided by the total number concentration of aerosol particles,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, for the given size distribution:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M65" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1212">The most common method for determining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (1) is through
extinction measurements of two gases with known Rayleigh scattering cross
sections, typically He and N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or zero air (Washenfelder
et al., 2008). Previous BBCES applications in the UV wavelength region often
used He and N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which have substantially different cross sections
(Washenfelder et al., 2013; Flores et al., 2014a; Bluvshtein et al.,
2017; Zhao et al., 2017). However, Rayleigh scattering is proportional to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and more accurate characterizations of mirror reflectivity
at visible wavelengths can be achieved by using a gas with a larger Rayleigh
scattering cross section than N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly when the
mirror reflectivity is not very high. We selected CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a stable,
inexpensive, non-toxic gas with a large Rayleigh scattering cross section.
The Rayleigh scattering cross section of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has been reported
(Shardanand and Rao, 1977; Sneep and Ubachs, 2005; He et al., 2018), but
it is not as well-known as N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. We determined it here by
introducing mixtures of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in He to the BBCES instrument, measuring
the extinction spectrum for each addition, and deriving the slope of the
linear fit of the extinction relative to the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> number density.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Correction of optical extinction for optical intensity and spectral
drift</title>
      <p id="d1e1343">Spectral fitting of trace gas absorbers in BBCES extinction spectra often
includes a fourth-order polynomial to account for drifts in the cavity,
spectrometer, and light source intensity (Platt et al., 2009; Thalman and
Volkamer, 2010; Min et al., 2016). While this can be effective for trace
gases with highly structured absorbing features measured using mirrors with
smoothly varying reflectivity, it is not appropriate for smoothly varying
aerosol extinction spectra or for cavity mirrors with reflectivity that
varies strongly with wavelength (see Fig. S1). Here, we describe a new
method to explicitly account for drifts in the cavity, spectrometer, and
light source intensity that affected the calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extinction
for the visible channel.</p>
      <p id="d1e1360">We determined that each measured spectrum may be affected by drift in the
light source intensity, drift in the spectrometer dark current background
counts, and a wavelength shift incurred by the temperature-dependent drifts
in the spectrometer optics and that these can each be represented by a
scalar parameter. Using a nonlinear Levenberg–Marquardt least-squares
fitting algorithm, the scalar parameters for these different types of drift
were fitted and the drifts removed. The fitting algorithm was tested
successfully on spectra of zero air and found to remove nearly all the
structure due to intensity and spectrometer drift. This correction was
subsequently used on all extinction spectra. Further details for this
correction can be found in the Supplement and in Fig. S2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Complex refractive index retrieval</title>
      <?pagebreak page7241?><p id="d1e1371">The aerosol optical extinction derived in Eq. (1) depends on wavelength,
aerosol size distribution, and the RI. Measurements of
aerosol optical extinction for different size selections can be used to
retrieve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Washenfelder et al., 2013; Flores et
al., 2014a; He et al., 2018) with assumptions that the aerosol population is
internally and externally well-mixed and that the refractive index does not
vary systematically with size. For PSL and ammonium sulfate aerosol, this
approach was used as described previously (Washenfelder et al., 2013;
Flores et al., 2014a). Each 2 min group of spectra for a single aerosol
population was averaged to determine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The aerosol extinction
cross section, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was then calculated using Eqs. (1) and (2),
with values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ZA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> linearly interpolated from
the nearest measurements. The set of aerosol extinction cross section
spectra (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">225</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
… ) and the average aerosol size distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each
time interval can then be used to retrieve the complex refractive index,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using a scattering theory.</p>
      <p id="d1e1563">We use a retrieval algorithm that calculates the expected extinction cross
section for a given wavelength, a given RI, and the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
compares it to the measured extinction cross section. Since the RI consists
of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, at least two extinction measurements are required to retrieve
these two parameters (Bluvshtein et al., 2012). We use
five diameter set points to increase the accuracy of the retrieval. A
least-squares minimization fit is used to identify the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values that
minimize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each wavelength:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.8}{8.8}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" columnspacing="1em" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calculated</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">measured</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">measured</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the extinction cross section from Eq. (2).</p>
      <p id="d1e1746">Previous work has assumed spherical aerosol populations that are well-represented by Mie theory and have easily measured size distributions
(Washenfelder et al., 2013; Flores et al., 2014a; He et al., 2018). The
biomass burning aerosol produced from some of the fires at the Fire Sciences
Laboratory was fractal and strongly absorbing. This required two
improvements to the retrieval algorithms, described further below: (1) the incorporation of two methods for size distribution measurements (the OPC and
the SMPS) to better characterize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and (2) the incorporation of two
scattering theories, Mie and Rayleigh–Debye–Gans (RDG), to represent both
spherical and fractal aerosol.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Treatment of the aerosol size distribution</title>
      <p id="d1e1773">The DMA transmits ionized particles of a specified mobility-to-charge ratio,
resulting in a small number of doubly  and triply charged particles that
appear as particles with mobility diameters approximately 2 and 3 times greater than expected. The relative contribution of the singly,
doubly, and triply charged particles to the total size distribution depends
on the ambient aerosol size distribution as well as the ratio of sheath
flow to aerosol flow in the DMA. To determine the aerosol size distribution,
we iteratively adjusted an assumed input size distribution transmitted
through the DMA transfer function until the theoretical particle
concentration produced by the inversion matched that measured by the CPC
(Twomey, 1975; Markowski, 1987). Once the input size distribution was
determined, the DMA transfer function was used to estimate the size
distribution of the aerosol exiting the DMA as the voltage was changed to
select different peak diameters.</p>
      <p id="d1e1776">For spherical, non-absorbing particles, such as ammonium sulfate aerosol, we
expect the SMPS scans and inversions to yield accurate size distributions,
as the contribution of multiply charged particles is straightforward to
calculate for spherical particles with well-known mobility diameters. If the
aerosol is significantly non-spherical, such as fractal BC
expected from some biomass burning smoke, then the transmission through the
DMA is affected by the aerodynamic resistance of the sheath flow
(Adler et al., 2019), the contribution of
multiply charged particles is difficult to ascertain, and the resulting
size-selected aerosol may not match the actual particle size. We therefore
do not attempt any correction to the SMPS scans for BC aerosol;
the inverted size distributions represent electrical mobility diameter rather than geometric diameter.</p>
      <p id="d1e1779">An alternate aerosol sizing instrument is the OPC, which sizes particles by
measuring the light scattered into a wide-angle lens or mirror mounted
perpendicularly to the direction of laser propagation. The integrated
side-scattering intensity increases monotonically with particle size for
non-absorbing particles. However, a theoretical correction must be made for
slightly  or highly absorbing particles. By calculating the scattered light
expected as a function of angle, using either Mie or RDG theory (see Sect. 3.3.2), one can integrate over the solid angle of the LAS measurement optics
to get a corrected LAS size distribution. We discuss this correction further
in Sect. 4.6.</p>
      <p id="d1e1782">Theoretical particle losses between the DMA and the BBCES instrument were
calculated (von der Weiden et al., 2009) as a function of
particle diameter and were accounted for in the size distribution
calculations. These losses were generally small, with fewer than 1 % loss
in the relevant particle diameter range of 100–800 nm for this analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>Mie theory and Rayleigh–Debye–Gans theory</title>
      <p id="d1e1794">Two theories are used in this paper to characterize the optical
properties of the measured aerosol. Mie theory is a solution to Maxwell's
equations that describes the interaction of light with homogeneous,
spherical particles when the diameter of the sphere is similar to the
wavelength of light (Bohren and Huffman, 1983). It is a truncated
infinite series representing the electromagnetic field scattered from
spheres. For the representation used in this work, the theory is valid when
the dimensionless size parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is approximately 1.
We adapted the Fortran code presented in Bohren and Huffman (1983)
for use in Igor Pro (Igor Pro; WaveMetrics, Inc., Lake Oswego, OR, USA). The
code calculates light scattering and absorption for homogeneous spheres or
homogeneous spheres with a concentric coating.</p>
      <p id="d1e1817">Rayleigh–Debye–Gans theory has often been applied to calculate the
interaction of light with fractal aggregates from biomass burning
(Sorensen, 2001). Spherical approximations and Mie theory are
poor representations of these particles, and more detailed models such as
the discrete dipole<?pagebreak page7242?> approximation are very computationally expensive.
RDG theory divides a particle into small-volume elements,
which are each treated as independent Rayleigh scatterers. Fractal
aggregates can be represented by the relatively simple parameterization
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M99" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of monomer spherules per aggregate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
fractal prefactor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the radius of gyration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the monomer radius,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fractal dimension (Sorensen, 2001; Smith and Grainger,
2014). The theory is valid when the relative refractive index and the
dimensionless size parameter of the monomer can be described as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Farias et al.,
1996). Code to calculate the expected extinction cross section as a function
of the input parameters was written in Igor Pro, following
Sorensen (2001).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Precision and accuracy of measured aerosol extinction and retrieved RI</title>
      <p id="d1e1944">The accuracy of the measured aerosol extinction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, was determined by
propagating the known uncertainties of the measurement. The precision in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrum is shot noise limited at the CCD. Figure S1b demonstrates that
error from this photon counting is negligible compared to the other
uncertainties. The majority of the error is attributed to uncertainty in the
Rayleigh scattering cross sections of zero air (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) as well as uncertainty in the measured temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and flow rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)
(Washenfelder et al., 2013). Summed in quadrature, the
total calculated uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, with some wavelength dependence. The uncertainty in the extinction
cross section, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as shown in Eq. (2), is derived from summing in
quadrature the error in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the error in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The error in the
particle counting, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, by the CPC is due to the uncertainty in the flow rate
and the variability in the number of particles entering the CPC. The last
factor is highest for the largest diameter set points due to the low number
of particles, and thus the uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> typically lay between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and was highest at the largest aerosol diameter set
points. The standard deviations for all measurements are indicated in the
figures by shaded error bars. The derived lower detection limit as a
function of wavelength is shown in Fig. S1b and spans 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Extinction values measured
during FIREX 2016 were generally greater than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and therefore within the measurable range of the BBCES.</p>
      <p id="d1e2205">To ascertain the uncertainty in the retrieved RI, we retrieve values three
times: once for the best estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and once for the upper
and lower bounds of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is likely a conservative estimate of
the total uncertainty and is shown as shaded error bars in the figures. The
RI was retrieved with a resolution of 0.01 in both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, so if the upper or
lower bound of the retrieved RI was within 0.01 of the best estimate, those
error bars appear to be zero. In that case, the error should be interpreted
as being no more than 0.01.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e2259">We present the results of measurements taken during and after the FIREX 2016
deployment. First, the measurement of the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Rayleigh scattering cross
section between 360 and 720 nm is presented, along with the measurement of
daily additions of known concentrations of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the duration
of the Fire Sciences Laboratory experiments, to ascertain the long-term stability and
accuracy of the BBCES extinction cross section measurements. Next, we
present retrievals of the RI of known laboratory standards – PSL and ammonium
sulfate – across a wider wavelength range than has previously been measured.
We use these measurements to assess the reliability of the two size
distribution methods. We examine measurements of two contrasting fires from
the Fire Sciences Laboratory, one dominated by spherical BrC particles and the other
by fractal BC particles, and demonstrate that the first can be
reasonably characterized using Mie theory, while the second cannot and
requires Rayleigh–Debye–Gans theory. These two fires are the same as presented
in Manfred et al. (2018), and we follow
that work in denoting the two fires Fire A and Fire B, respectively. Finally, RIs
were retrieved for 13 fires assuming Mie theory, and the quality of the fits
is related to the black carbon content of the smoke, demonstrating that
smoke with higher BC generally cannot be fit well with Mie theory.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{CO${}_{{2}}$ Rayleigh scattering cross section}?><title>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Rayleigh scattering cross section</title>
      <p id="d1e2297">Figure 2 shows the measured CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Rayleigh scattering extinction spectra,
determined from six fractional concentrations of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in He that evenly
span 0–1. The mirror reflectivity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was determined here using
pure He and zero air standards. The CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> extinction spectrum, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at each concentration was determined using Eq. (1), with He
replacing zero air as the reference gas. Spectral peaks attributed to
absorption by O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> near 688 nm (Greenblatt et al., 1990)
and the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxygen dimer near 477, 577, and 630 nm (Hermans,
2011) were fitted and removed prior to further analysis. At each wavelength,
the measured extinction (units of cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was plotted against the number
density of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (units of cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the slope of the linear fit is
the Rayleigh scattering cross section (units of cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2418">The measured Rayleigh scattering cross section of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
red solid line and filled diamond show the measurement by BBCES and CRDS,
respectively, with the black dashed line showing the power law fit to the
measured data. Several other literature parameterizations are shown as solid
colored lines and discussed further in the text. The ratio of each trace
relative to the power law fit derived here is shown at the bottom, and all
are within 10 % of the fit derived here. The small peaks and valleys
observed in the experimental fit are due to imperfect subtraction of peaks
from O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxygen dimer.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/7235/2021/acp-21-7235-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2454">The CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Rayleigh scattering cross section determined for the two BBCES
channels and CRDS channel agree well, as shown in Fig. 2. A power law fit to
the BBCES data from 360–720 nm is parameterized as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rayleigh</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.036</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Three literature values for the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Rayleigh
scattering cross section are also plotted in Fig. 2. These were
experimentally determined using a scattering chamber (Shardanand and
Rao, 1977), CRDS (Sneep and<?pagebreak page7243?> Ubachs, 2005), and BBCES
(He et al., 2018). Our power law fit is consistent with all
prior measurements within 10 % at all wavelengths and is within 5 % of
the two more recent studies at lower wavelengths where the Rayleigh
scattering is greater. We use the power law parameterization of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
Rayleigh scattering cross section for the retrievals described below.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Standard additions of NO${}_{{2}}$}?><title>Standard additions of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e2554">To assess the long-term stability of the instrument, we introduced
concentrations of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during each of the 16 measurement days at the
Fire Sciences Laboratory, using the flow system shown in Fig. 1b. Each set
of additions included four NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from 0 to 72 ppbv.
Measured NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> number densities were retrieved by fitting the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
absorption cross section (Vandaele et al., 1998)
to the extinction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with shift and stretch of the
literature spectrum to account for discrepancies in the BBCES wavelength
calibration (Min et al., 2016). A small
amount of HONO was observed in the UV channel, but it has distinct spectral
peaks and did not interfere with the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fits. The measured NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations are compared to the nominal concentrations determined by the
flow rates and shown in Fig. S3. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are greater than 0.99
and the slopes vary from 0.8–1, with a slight downward drift in both
parameters over time. This could be due to conversion of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, as the
BBCES is designed to minimize particle losses, not NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conversion on
surfaces. It is also possible that the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration tank
concentration changes over time, as the output of these tanks is known to
deviate significantly from the manufacturer's specified concentration
(Chilton et al., 2005). The two fires examined in this paper – Fires A and B – occurred on 31 October and 1 November 2016, and Fig. S3 shows
agreement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % with the nominal NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration on those
2 d.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Refractive index retrieval for PSL</title>
      <p id="d1e2692">We atomized five aqueous solutions of monodisperse PSL with diameters from
150 to 400 nm and passed the resulting aerosol flow through a DMA to remove
any clumped particles or small spheres of surfactant (Miles et al., 2010;
Thalman and Volkamer, 2010). The size-selected aerosol was monitored by a
UHSAS OPC and found to be consistent within uncertainty with the
manufacturer-specified mode diameter and Gaussian distribution. SMPS-derived
size distributions of PSL were not measured, due to their narrow diameter
distribution. The intensity spectra and size distributions were averaged for
approximately 90 s at each diameter set point, and extinction cross sections
were derived using Eqs. (1) and (2), as described in Sect. 4.1 and 4.2. To
minimize errors due to changes in the light source and optical stability, we
measured the mirror reflectivity before and after each PSL diameter set
point, in addition to using the fitting algorithm described in Sects. 3.2 and S1.</p>
      <p id="d1e2695">The resulting extinction cross sections for the five PSL diameters are shown
in Fig. 3a. Calculated extinction cross sections from the measured OPC size
distribution and the RI reported by Nikolov and Ivanov (2000)
are also shown, and these agree with our measured extinction cross sections
within the instrument uncertainty. The largest error bars appear in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm extinction cross section. It was difficult to produce PSL
solutions with sufficiently high concentrations at the larger diameters, and
the extinction cross section, which is the total extinction divided by the
total particle counts, is therefore highly sensitive to the accuracy of the
particle counting. To reduce error in the RI retrieval, we exclude the 400 nm spectrum from the RI retrieval.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2715"><bold>(a)</bold> Measured extinction cross sections for five diameters of PSLs are shown as solid lines, with 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> error bars designated by shaded
regions. The theoretical extinction cross section calculated from the RI of
Nikolov and Ivanov (2000) and the measured aerosol size distribution is
shown as filled squares for each diameter set point. <bold>(b)</bold> The retrieved RI of
PSL spheres derived from the measurement in <bold>(a)</bold> and the size distribution
measured by the OPC. The RI is retrieved to the nearest 0.01, and the
absence of a visible upper or lower error bar implies that the calculated error
is less than 0.01. The RIs retrieved by Nikolov and Ivanov (2000) are shown as
black squares. The error increases at longer wavelengths due to increased
uncertainty in the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Rayleigh scattering spectrum.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/7235/2021/acp-21-7235-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2749">The retrieved RI is shown in Fig. 3b. We find that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> varies from 1.65 to 1.57
between 360 and 700 nm, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout, as expected for purely
scattering particles. We empirically fit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to a third-order polynomial
function of wavelength as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0035</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.62</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the measured spectral range.
Nikolov and Ivanov (2000) measured the RI of PSL spheres using
a direct scattering photodetector and found a gradual decrease from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.62</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the<?pagebreak page7244?> wavelength region 450 to 700 nm, as shown in
Fig. 3b. Several other recent experimental studies (Garvey and Pinnick,
1983; Abo Riziq et al., 2007; Dinar et al., 2008; Washenfelder et al., 2013)
at 390 and 532 nm are also shown and agree well with our results.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Refractive index retrieval for ammonium sulfate</title>
      <p id="d1e2888">Figure 4 shows the retrieved RI for ammonium sulfate aerosol, using the two
different size distribution methods. Ammonium sulfate particles were
atomized from a 6.0 g L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> aqueous solution of ammonium sulfate in distilled
water and then dried to less than 5 % RH to minimize the water content.
Extinction cross sections were determined at diameter set points from 150–450 in 75 nm increments. The aerosol size distribution was measured
continuously after the DMA by a UHSAS OPC, which was independently
calibrated for ammonium sulfate particles prior to the experiment
(Kupc et al., 2018). Additionally, SMPS scans were
taken before and after each set of aerosol diameter set points, and an
inversion algorithm was used to derive the full size distribution of the
atomized aerosol entering the DMA. Spurious peaks in the size distribution
at diameters greater than 750 nm were removed. Section S2 describes this
correction further. The DMA transfer function was then used to determine the
aerosol size distribution at each diameter set point.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2905">The RI retrieved for dry ammonium sulfate aerosol, using two
particle size distribution methods: an OPC (LAS 3340) and a DMA operating in
SMPS mode. Both retrievals agree well with literature values for ammonium
sulfate between 350 and 550 nm. As in Fig. 3, the RI is retrieved to the
nearest 0.01, and an absence of a visible error bar implies that the
calculated error is smaller than 0.01.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/7235/2021/acp-21-7235-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page7245?><p id="d1e2914"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The RI values in Fig. 4 range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 360 nm to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 720 nm, though the error bars for the imaginary component span 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus cannot be distinguished from a non-absorbing aerosol. The results from
the two size distribution methods agree well, indicating that the SMPS size
distribution is an accurate assessment of the aerosol population. We
empirically fit the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> derived by OPC as a third-order polynomial function
of wavelength as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0052</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.51</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the entire spectral range.
Recent literature values measured by CRDS at 355, 390, 405, and 532 nm are
shown and summarized in Washenfelder et al. (2013). Few
measurements of ammonium sulfate RI have been reported at wavelengths
greater than 532 nm. The calculated uncertainty is higher at longer
wavelengths due to increased uncertainty in the Rayleigh scattering at those
wavelengths.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Refractive index retrieval for aerosol dominated by brown carbon (Fire A)</title>
      <p id="d1e3040">Fire A (no. 086) was a lodgepole pine (<italic>Pinus contorta</italic>) fire, with a mixture of small logs,
litter duff, and canopy branches with low moisture content, intended to be
representative of wildfire fuel composition. The smoke was dominated by
BrC with a small contribution from fractal soot-like particles, as
shown by the large decrease in number and mode volume when the aerosol was
thermodenuded (Manfred et al., 2018). This
implies that the majority of the particles consisted of volatile organic
matter that was efficiently vaporized in the thermodenuder. We assume that
the volatile organic matter has spherical or near-spherical morphology that
can be represented using Mie theory.</p>
      <p id="d1e3046">The retrieved RI values for undenuded aerosol measured 1 h after fire
ignition are shown in Fig. 5a for one 10 min measurement cycle. Both SMPS
and OPC size distributions were available for this set of extinction cross
sections, and two diameters are displayed in Fig. 5b. However, there are
some differences between the two size distribution measurements. First, as
in the ammonium sulfate retrieval in Sect. 4.4, the SMPS inverted full size
distribution has some spurious values at diameters above 550 nm which are
not observed in the OPC and which skew the size distributions to higher
diameters. Therefore, we again apply an upper diameter threshold, above
which the SMPS size distributions are set to zero. Second, the OPC size
distribution for every diameter set point shows a small peak near 100 nm.
That these small particles passed through the DMA at larger diameter set
points suggests that they are small fractal particles, which were selected
by the DMA due to their relatively large aerodynamic diameter. Scanning
electron microscopy images from the denuded channel for this fire confirm
the presence of small fractal particles
(Manfred et al., 2018). These particles
are quite small and therefore do not contribute much to the total aerosol
extinction, but for the larger diameter set points they comprise a
significant percentage of the total number of particles. Therefore, we must
explicitly include these small particles as part of the size distribution.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3051"><bold>(a)</bold> Retrieved RI of undenuded smoke during Fire A, a primarily
brown carbon fire. The BBCES and CRDS retrievals are shown as solid lines and
circular markers and are calculated to the nearest 0.01. The squares
indicate the assumed RI in Manfred et al. (2018) for this fire. The increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with decreasing wavelength is
characteristic of brown carbon aerosol. <bold>(b)</bold> The normalized size distribution
of the aerosol from the OPC and the SMPS for two size set points: 150 and
450 nm. The 150 nm OPC measurement has a small peak near 100 nm but
otherwise shows reasonable agreement with the SMPS, while the 450 nm
set point OPC distribution shows that a significant fraction of the aerosol is
smaller than 450 nm, which is not reflected in the SMPS estimate. The other
size set points lie in between these two extremes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/7235/2021/acp-21-7235-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3073">Finally, it can be seen in Fig. 5b that the main mode diameter for each set
point is approximately 5 % higher in the OPC than the intended set point,
as indicated by the mode diameter in the SMPS. The LAS OPC is calibrated for
ammonium sulfate particles, assuming an RI of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If these brown
carbon particles scatter light more effectively than ammonium sulfate
particles, then the OPC will interpret this increased light scattering as a
larger particle. This also holds true for the small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm
peaks, which likely consist of BC particles with an RI very different from
that of ammonium sulfate. Therefore, the sizing of these particles by the
OPC may be somewhat incorrect.</p>
      <p id="d1e3100">Despite these caveats, we use the LAS size distribution without further
modification for the RI retrieval in Fig. 5a. We find that the real
component of the retrieved RI varies from 1.55 to 1.60, while the imaginary
component steadily increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as the
wavelength decreases from 550–360 nm. This is highly characteristic of
BrC aerosol and consistent with previous estimates of the complex
refractive index of fresh biomass burning aerosol summarized in
Bluvshtein et al. (2017). Furthermore, these observations
differ significantly from the measured RI of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for spherical BC described as tar balls<?pagebreak page7246?> by
Chakrabarty et al. (2010), indicating that
the aerosol population measured here does not have a significant
contribution from tar balls. At the OPC laser wavelength of 663 nm, the
retrieved RI is (1.61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Particles with
this RI will scatter light slightly more efficiently than ammonium sulfate
particles, and therefore the LAS will attribute this scattered light to a
slightly larger particle. Therefore, this result is consistent with our
finding that the LAS mode diameters are slightly higher than the diameter
set point. However, we do not attempt to correct the LAS diameters further,
as that analysis is complicated by the small number of fractal particles
also observed. Manfred et al. (2018)
assumed a typical RI for brown carbon (Dinar et al.,
2008), shown as filled squares at 375 and 405 nm, to model the measured
phase function from this fire, with good results. We find good agreement
with those assumed RIs within instrumental uncertainty.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <label>4.6</label><title>Refractive index retrieval for aerosol dominated by black carbon (Fire
B)</title>
      <p id="d1e3175">Fire B (no. 085) was a sage (<italic>Artemisia</italic>) fire that produced smoke with a high BC content, as evidenced by the minimal change in particle counts and
volume between the fresh and thermodenuded smoke
(Manfred et al., 2018). Furthermore,
Manfred et al. (2018) demonstrated that
the measured phase function for this aerosol population could not be
accurately fit assuming Mie theory and a typical BrC RI. Instead,
they used Rayleigh–Debye–Gans theory, along with two different
parameterizations of the fractal particles, to fit the measurement. As
described in Sect. 3.3.2, RDG theory treats fractal particles as an
aggregate of many smaller monomers, and the input parameters describe the
number of monomers, their configuration in the aggregate, and the extinction
properties of each monomer.</p>
      <p id="d1e3181">Unfortunately, neither size distribution method used here can accurately
constrain these parameters well. The SMPS size distributions are inaccurate
because fractal particles have mobility diameters that differ significantly
from their geometric diameters. The OPC size distributions yield more useful
information because they measure scattered light within a certain solid
angle range, which is later attributed to a certain particle diameter. Only
purely scattering and very slightly absorbing particles display
monotonically increasing scattering as a function of increasing particle
diameter. Highly or moderately absorbing particles tend to side-scatter
significantly less than scattering particles to the angles the LAS is most
sensitive to, and the scattering often non-monotonically increases as
particle size increases (Szymanski et al., 2009).
Therefore, a large diameter range of absorbing particles has similar
scattering properties and cannot be distinguished, as illustrated in Fig. S5. However, we can make an adjustment to the measured OPC size
distributions. As described in Sect. 3.3.2, we use RDG theory to predict the
side scatter into the OPC collection optics for particles as a function of
the number of monomers, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while holding the other parameters in Eq. (4) constant. This allows us to treat the nominal OPC size distribution as a
distribution of monomers in the fractal particle. We can then use the same
RDG parameters to estimate the extinction cross section and compare it to
the measured spectra. Because the RI retrieval is so sensitive to an
accurate representation of the particle size, we do not attempt to fit any
of the RDG parameters. Instead, we show the expected cross sections for two
plausible RDG parameterizations of BC particles.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7247?><p id="d1e3195">Figure 6 shows the measured extinction cross sections for the five diameter
set points. These spectra were taken 1 h after the fire was ignited and
represent the aerosol that passed through the thermodenuder. Therefore, the
majority of organic coatings that might complicate the analysis are removed
prior to measurement. Following Manfred et
al. (2018), we use two parameterizations. Both assume an RI for BC
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006) and an individual
monomer diameter of 50 nm. The first is meant to represent fractal particles
from fossil fuel combustion. It assumes a prefactor of 1.2 and a fractal
dimension of 1.75 (Sorensen, 2001). The second represents sage
biomass burning and consists of a prefactor of 2.56 and a fractal dimension
of 1.79 (Chakrabarty et al., 2006). The two
parameterizations are shown in Fig. 6a and b. The fossil fuel
parameterization yields the closer approximation of the measured data, but
the measurement lies in between the two parameterizations. This is
consistent with the results of Manfred et
al. (2018), in which the measured phase function for thermodenuded smoke
from Fire B lay in between the two parameterizations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3215">Measured extinction cross section of thermodenuded black carbon
dominated aerosol in Fire B are shown as the thin solid lines. Calculated
extinction cross section for different RDG parameters (Eq. 4) are shown in
each panel. <bold>(a)</bold> Fossil fuel RDG parameters from Sorensen (2001). <bold>(b)</bold>
Biomass burning RDG parameters for sage from Chakrabarty et al. (2006). The
measurement lies between these two parameterizations, thereby constraining
the RDG prefactor and fractal dimension, but is closer to the fossil fuel
parameterization.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/7235/2021/acp-21-7235-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS7">
  <label>4.7</label><title>Summary of refractive index retrievals for 13 fires during FIREX</title>
      <p id="d1e3238">We place the Fire A and B retrievals in the context of the other FIREX
measurements by analyzing the quality of the RI retrieval method assuming
Mie theory and relating these values to the fraction of aerosol that is
black carbon. The BC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (BC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OA) fraction was calculated relative to the
largest BC fraction for 13 fires for which the data were available from the
average SP2 black carbon mass and the relative AMS organic aerosol mass, and
the error bars were derived from propagating the two instrument
uncertainties. Only aerosol that bypassed the thermodenuder was used in this
analysis, in order to quantify fresh non-denuded smoke. We elected to
evaluate the RI retrieval as a function of the BC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (BC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OA) ratio
instead of the mass combustion efficiency, as BC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (BC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OA) has been shown to more strongly
correlate with single scattering albedo and the Ångström absorption
coefficient (Pokhrel et al., 2016). The
RI retrievals were performed using the SMPS size distributions, as the LAS
data were often not available. Therefore, this analysis is also a function of
how well the SMPS size distributions characterize the aerosol geometric
diameter. Figure S6 shows the retrieved wavelength-dependent RI for each
fire across the entire 360–720 nm wavelength range. To demonstrate the
effectiveness of the retrieval method, we report the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the RI
retrieval in Fig. 7 at a single wavelength, 475 nm, where the BBCES instrument had
high mirror reflectivity and therefore good precision. The reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each fire is from a single set of measurements through the
bypass channel, approximately 1 h after the fire start, and therefore
represents well-mixed smoke. The derived real part of the RI for the low-BC
fires ranged from 1.54 to 1.69 at 475 nm with an average value of 1.635 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.056, and the imaginary part ranged from 0.00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to 0.23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with an
average value of 0.06<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12. At 365 nm, the average value of the real
part was 1.605 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.041 and the imaginary part was 0.038<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.074. We note that the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value is slightly greater at 475 nm than
at 365 nm, but the two values are consistent within the error bars of the
averaged measurements of aerosol from different fuel types and fire
conditions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3372">An analysis of 13 fires at the Fire Sciences Laboratory, including the two
presented in detail in this paper. Each fire was analyzed identically in
this figure. For each fire, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the retrieval fit at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">475</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm assuming Mie theory is plotted against the relative
fraction of total aerosol that is BC. There is a correlation between the BC
fraction and the quality of the fit assuming Mie theory. Fire B has a far
higher fraction of BC than the other fires and is fit very poorly assuming
Mie theory, while Fire A is fit more accurately by Mie theory. The majority
of fires have a smaller BC contribution than either Fire A or B and are
generally fit reasonably well assuming Mie theory. Note that we have plotted
relative BC fraction rather than absolute fraction. Significant
uncertainties in the AMS data make the absolute fraction difficult to
accurately assess, as described in Sect. 2.6, but the relative fraction is
still robust. Therefore, Fire B, which had the highest BC fraction, is
defined here as 1, and the BC fractions for the other fires are scaled
relative to Fire B.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/7235/2021/acp-21-7235-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page7248?><p id="d1e3404">Figure 7 shows a correlation between the relative fraction of BC in the
total aerosol mass and the quality of the RI retrieval assuming Mie theory
and spherical particles well-characterized by the SMPS. Fire B has the
highest relative BC fraction, defined here as 1, and is poorly described by
Mie theory, with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.3. This finding is consistent with
Smith and Grainger (2014), who found that there is no
refractive index that suitably describes fractal BC if those particles are
treated as spheres with Mie theory. Fire A has a lower relative BC fraction
and is better described by Mie theory, consistent with Sect. 4.5 and 4.6.
Most of the other 11 fires analyzed here have a smaller BC fraction than
Fire A and a correspondingly lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value. This indicates that
the majority of smoke sampled during FIREX had relatively low BC and could
reasonably be analyzed using Mie theory. However, we note that this
freshly emitted smoke was from small-scale burns under controlled
conditions and may not represent the full range of smoke aerosol types in
ambient aerosol, including dust and biological fragments. Additionally,
further downwind of the fire, coagulation and fractal aggregate collapse can
alter the particle morphology. Furthermore, the poor fit quality of the high-BC fire (Fire B) shows that Mie theory is not appropriate for all smoke,
especially smoke with a high BC fraction. Since BC fraction is not a metric
that is easily quantified with remote sensing, further work is still needed
to link this parameterization to remote-sensing measurements to predict when
Mie theory representation of wildfire smoke is appropriate.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3439">This paper describes the development of a new broadband cavity-enhanced
spectrometer that derives the RI of biomass burning aerosol with low BC
content over a very broadband wavelength region in the ultraviolet and
visible spectral regions. It was outfitted with an automated flow system for
size-selected retrievals of the complex refractive index of biomass burning
aerosol. After measuring the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Rayleigh scattering cross section
across the 360–720 nm spectral region and confirming the long-term
stability and accuracy of the instrument with repeated additions of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, we demonstrated the effectiveness of the RI retrieval algorithm on
two laboratory standard aerosols: PSL and ammonium sulfate. Good agreement
was found for each standard with other literature values. We demonstrate
that the OPC is an effective method for quantifying the size distribution of
the generated aerosol but that it is quite sensitive itself to the aerosol
refractive index. We also demonstrate that with a simple diameter threshold
cutoff to remove artifacts, the SMPS can provide accurate size distributions
for spherical particles which yield retrievals consistent with literature
values.</p>
      <p id="d1e3460">This instrument was deployed to the Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory for
the 2016 FIREX campaign, where it measured real biomass burning aerosol from
a series of controlled burns of North American fuels. We presented measured
extinction cross sections from two representative fires: lodgepole pine,
which produced smoke dominated by BrC, and sage, which produced
smoke dominated by BC. The optical properties of the BrC-dominated
smoke could be modeled with Mie theory and a wavelength-dependent RI that
increased its absorption component as wavelength decreases. This behavior is
consistent with other observations of BrC and demonstrates that this BBCES
instrument and retrieval algorithm is capable of measuring biomass burning
aerosol.</p>
      <p id="d1e3463">The BC-dominated smoke, on the other hand, could not be modeled using Mie
theory and was better represented by Rayleigh–Debye–Gans theory. Two
possible RDG parameterizations were assessed to quantify their ability to
reproduce the observations. We found that the measurement lay somewhere
between the two parameterizations. Due to the large number of unknown
variables and the absence of a reliable metric of the particle morphology,
we do not attempt to further characterize the optical properties of this BC
smoke. However, we find that a reasonable parameterization of RDG theory can
largely reproduce the measured results and recommend this parameterization
for further characterization of BC-dominated fires.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7249?><p id="d1e3466">We retrieved RIs for 11 additional fires and found a correlation between
the quality of the RI retrieval fit and the fraction of BC, with high-BC
fires, such as Fire B, poorly described by Mie theory and those with lower
BC content better described by Mie theory. We found that the majority
of smoke measurements had fairly low BC content, and the RIs could therefore
be reasonably retrieved. However, remote-sensing retrievals of biomass
burning aerosol must account for the optical properties of smoke with
varying amounts of BC, and Mie theory is therefore not always an appropriate
theory to use.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3473">All data are available upon request to the corresponding author
(caroline.womack@noaa.gov).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3476">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7235-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7235-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3485">CCW, KMM, NLW, GA, AF, KDL, AMM, JPS, and RAW collected and analyzed the
Fire Sciences Laboratory data. CAB advised the data collection of the laboratory standards
and provided instrumentation. CCW, SSB, and RAW conceptualized the
experiment, data collection, and data analysis. CCW wrote the data analysis
code. KMM advised the data analysis. CCW and RAW wrote the paper with
contributions from all authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3491">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3497">We thank Yinon Rudich and Quanfu He for high-finesse cavity mirrors and
technical discussions about their properties. We thank Agnieszka Kupc and
Karl Froyd for the loan of the LAS and providing calibration information. We
thank Jim Roberts, Carsten Warneke, and Bob Yokelson for coordinating the
Fire Sciences Laboratory campaign and the Fire Sciences Laboratory in Missoula for hosting
the campaign.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3502">This project was supported by the NOAA Atmospheric Chemistry, Carbon, and Climate Program (AC4); the NASA Radiation Sciences Program; and the NOAA Cooperative Agreement with CIRES (grant no. NA17OAR4320101).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3508">This paper was edited by Manvendra K. Dubey and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Abo Riziq, A., Erlick, C., Dinar, E., and Rudich, Y.: Optical properties of absorbing and non-absorbing aerosols retrieved by cavity ring down (CRD) spectroscopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1523–1536, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1523-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1523-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Adler, G., Wagner, N. L., Lamb, K. D., Manfred, K. M., Schwarz, J. P.,
Franchin, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Washenfelder, R. A., Womack, C. C.,
Yokelson, R. J., and Murphy, D. M.: Evidence in biomass burning smoke for a
light-absorbing aerosol with properties intermediate between brown and black
carbon, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 976–989, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1617832" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2019.1617832</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Attwood, A. R., Washenfelder, R. A., Brock, C. A., Hu, W., Baumann, K.,
Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Edgerton, E. S., Murphy, D. M., Palm, B. B.,
McComiskey, A., Wagner, N. L., de Sá, S. S., Ortega, A., Martin, S. T.,
Jimenez, J. L., and Brown, S. S.: Trends in sulfate and organic aerosol mass
in the Southeast U.S.: Impact on aerosol optical depth and radiative
forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 7701–7709,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl061669" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014gl061669</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bahreini, R., Dunlea, E. J., Matthew, B. M., Simons, C., Docherty, K. S.,
DeCarlo, P. F., Jimenez, J. L., Brock, C. A., and Middlebrook, A. M.: Design
and operation of a pressure-controlled inlet for airborne sampling with an
aerodynamic aerosol lens, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 465–471,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802178514" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820802178514</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bahreini, R., Ervens, B., Middlebrook, A. M., Warneke, C., de Gouw, J. A.,
DeCarlo, P. F., Jimenez, J. L., Brock, C. A., Neuman, J. A., Ryerson, T. B.,
Stark, H., Atlas, E., Brioude, J., Fried, A., Holloway, J. S., Peischl, J.,
Richter, D., Walega, J., Weibring, P., Wollny, A. G., and Fehsenfeld, F. C.:
Organic aerosol formation in urban and industrial plumes near Houston and
Dallas, Texas, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00F16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011493" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd011493</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bluvshtein, N., Flores, J. M., Riziq, A. A., and Rudich, Y.: An approach for
faster retrieval of aerosols' complex refractive index using cavity
ring-down spectroscopy, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 1140–1150,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.700141" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2012.700141</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bluvshtein, N., Lin, P., Flores, J. M., Segev, L., Mazar, Y., Tas, E.,
Snider, G., Weagle, C., Brown, S. S., Laskin, A., and Rudich, Y.: Broadband
optical properties of biomass-burning aerosol and identification of brown
carbon chromophores, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 5441–5456,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026230" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016jd026230</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and scattering of light by
small particles, Wiley-Interscience, New York, USA, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light absorption by carbonaceous
particles: An investigative review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 27–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500421521</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U.<?pagebreak page7250?>, Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor,
M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley,
P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmüller, H., Garro, M. A., Arnott, W. P., Walker,
J., Susott, R. A., Babbitt, R. E., Wold, C. E., Lincoln, E. N., and Hao, W.
M.: Emissions from the laboratory combustion of wildland fuels: Particle
morphology and size, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D07204,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006659" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005jd006659</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmüller, H., Chen, L.-W. A., Lewis, K., Arnott, W. P., Mazzoleni, C., Dubey, M. K., Wold, C. E., Hao, W. M., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Brown carbon in tar balls from smoldering biomass combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6363–6370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Chilton, J. E., Timko, R. J., and Chuhta, E. J.: Nitrogen dioxide
calibration standards for portable monitors, Information Circular 9482, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Department of Health and Human Services
Pittsburgh Research Laboratory
Pittsburg, PA, USA, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>China, S., Mazzoleni, C., Gorkowski, K., Aiken, A. C., and Dubey, M. K.:
Morphology and mixing state of individual freshly emitted wildfire
carbonaceous particles, Nat. Commun., 4, 2122,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms3122</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dennison, P. E., Brewer, S. C., Arnold, J. D., and Moritz, M. A.: Large
wildfire trends in the western United States, 1984–2011, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 2928–2933, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl059576" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014gl059576</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dinar, E., Abo Riziq, A., Spindler, C., Erlick, C., Kiss, G., and Rudich,
Y.: The complex refractive index of atmospheric and model humic-like
substances (HULIS) retrieved by a cavity ring down aerosol spectrometer
(CRD-AS), Faraday Discuss., 137, 279–295, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B703111D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B703111D</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Farias, T. L., Köylü, Ü. Ö., and Carvalho, M. G.: Range of
validity of the Rayleigh-Debye-Gans theory for optics of fractal
aggregates, Appl. Optics, 35, 6560–6567,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.006560" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.35.006560</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fiedler, S. E., Hese, A., and Ruth, A. A.: Incoherent broad-band
cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy, Chem. Phys. Lett., 371, 284–294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(03)00263-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0009-2614(03)00263-x</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Flores, J. M., Washenfelder, R. A., Adler, G., Lee, H. J., Segev, L.,
Laskin, J., Laskin, A., Nizkorodov, S. A., Brown, S. S., and Rudich, Y.:
Complex refractive indices in the near-ultraviolet spectral region of
biogenic secondary organic aerosol aged with ammonia, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 16, 10629–10642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp01009d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c4cp01009d</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Flores, J. M., Zhao, D. F., Segev, L., Schlag, P., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Fuchs, H., Watne, Å. K., Bluvshtein, N., Mentel, Th. F., Hallquist, M., and Rudich, Y.: Evolution of the complex refractive index in the UV spectral region in ageing secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5793–5806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5793-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5793-2014</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Forrest, S. R. and Witten, T. A.: Long-range correlations in smoke-particle
aggregates, J. Phys. A-Math. Gen., 12, 109–117,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/12/5/008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0305-4470/12/5/008</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fuchs, H., Dubé, W. P., Lerner, B. M., Wagner, N. L., Williams, E. J.,
and Brown, S. S.: A sensitive and versatile detector for atmospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> based on blue diode laser cavity ring-down
spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7831–7836,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es902067h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es902067h</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Garvey, D. M. and Pinnick, R. G.: Response characteristics of the particle
measuring systems active scattering aerosol spectrometer probe (ASASP-X),
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 2, 477–488, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828308958651" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786828308958651</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Greenblatt, G. D., Orlando, J. J., Burkholder, J. B., and Ravishankara, A.
R.: Absorption measurements of oxygen between 330 and 1140 nm, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 95, 18577–18582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD11p18577" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD095iD11p18577</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>He, Q., Bluvshtein, N., Segev, L., Meidan, D., Flores, J. M., Brown, S. S.,
Brune, W., and Rudich, Y.: Evolution of the complex refractive index of
secondary organic aerosols during atmospheric aging, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 3456–3465, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05742" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b05742</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hermans, C.: Measurement of absorption cross sections and spectroscopic molecular parameters, <uri>http://spectrolab.aeronomie.be/o2.htm</uri> (last access:
26 October 2020), 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huffman, J. A., Ziemann, P. J., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Development and characterization of a fast-stepping/scanning
thermodenuder for chemically-resolved aerosol volatility measurements,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 395–407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802104981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820802104981</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Islam, M., Ciaffoni, L., Hancock, G., and Ritchie, G. A. D.: Demonstration
of a novel laser-driven light source for broadband spectroscopy between 170 nm and 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Analyst, 138, 4741–4745,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3AN01020A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3AN01020A</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Knutson, E. O. and Whitby, K. T.: Aerosol classification by electric
mobility: apparatus, theory, and applications, J. Aerosol Sci., 6, 443–451, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(75)90060-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-8502(75)90060-9</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kondo, Y., Sahu, L., Moteki, N., Khan, F., Takegawa, N., Liu, X., Koike, M.,
and Miyakawa, T.: Consistency and traceability of black carbon measurements
made by laser-induced incandescence, thermal-optical transmittance, and
filter-based photo-absorption techniques, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 295–312, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.533215" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.533215</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kupc, A., Williamson, C., Wagner, N. L., Richardson, M., and Brock, C. A.: Modification, calibration, and performance of the Ultra-High Sensitivity Aerosol Spectrometer for particle size distribution and volatility measurements during the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) airborne campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 369–383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-369-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-369-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lamarque, J.-F., Emmons, L. K., Hess, P. G., Kinnison, D. E., Tilmes, S., Vitt, F., Heald, C. L., Holland, E. A., Lauritzen, P. H., Neu, J., Orlando, J. J., Rasch, P. J., and Tyndall, G. K.: CAM-chem: description and evaluation of interactive atmospheric chemistry in the Community Earth System Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 369–411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-369-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-369-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric
brown carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7251?><ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., and Dubovik, O.: Global aerosol optical
properties and application to Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
aerosol retrieval over land, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D13210,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007815" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007815</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, C., He, Q., Hettiyadura, A. P. S., Käfer, U., Shmul, G., Meidan, D.,
Zimmermann, R., Brown, S. S., George, C., Laskin, A., and Rudich, Y.:
Formation of secondary brown carbon in biomass burning aerosol proxies
through NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical reactions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 1395–1405, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05641" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b05641</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, J., Pósfai, M., Hobbs, P. V., and Buseck, P. R.: Individual aerosol
particles from biomass burning in southern Africa: 2. Compositions and aging
of inorganic particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, SAF 20,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002310" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd002310</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liao, H., Adams, P. J., Chung, S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Mickley, L. J., and
Jacob, D. J.: Interactions between tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in a
unified general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001260" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001jd001260</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Manfred, K. M., Washenfelder, R. A., Wagner, N. L., Adler, G., Erdesz, F., Womack, C. C., Lamb, K. D., Schwarz, J. P., Franchin, A., Selimovic, V., Yokelson, R. J., and Murphy, D. M.: Investigating biomass burning aerosol morphology using a laser imaging nephelometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1879–1894, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1879-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-1879-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Markowski, G. R.: Improving Twomey's algorithm for inversion of aerosol
measurement data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 7, 127–141,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828708959153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786828708959153</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McMeeking, G. R., Kreidenweis, S. M., Baker, S., Carrico, C. M., Chow, J.
C., Collett Jr., J. L., Hao, W. M., Holden, A. S., Kirchstetter, T. W.,
Malm, W. C., Moosmüller, H., Sullivan, A. P., and Wold, C. E.: Emissions
of trace gases and aerosols during the open combustion of biomass in the
laboratory, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D19210,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011836" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd011836</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miles, R. E. H., Rudić, S., Orr-Ewing, A. J., and Reid, J. P.:
Measurements of the wavelength dependent extinction of aerosols by cavity
ring down spectroscopy, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 12, 3914–3920,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B923758E" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B923758E</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Min, K.-E., Washenfelder, R. A., Dubé, W. P., Langford, A. O., Edwards, P. M., Zarzana, K. J., Stutz, J., Lu, K., Rohrer, F., Zhang, Y., and Brown, S. S.: A broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectrometer for aircraft measurements of glyoxal, methylglyoxal, nitrous acid, nitrogen dioxide, and water vapor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 423–440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-423-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-423-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moise, T., Flores, J. M., and Rudich, Y.: Optical properties of secondary
organic aerosols and their changes by chemical processes, Chem. Rev., 115,
4400–4439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005259" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5005259</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moosmüller, H. and Arnott, W. P.: Particle optics in the rayleigh
regime, J. Air Waste Manage., 59, 1028–1031,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1028</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moosmüller, H., Chakrabarty, R. K., and Arnott, W. P.: Aerosol light
absorption and its measurement: A review, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110,
844–878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.035</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nakayama, T., Matsumi, Y., Sato, K., Imamura, T., Yamazaki, A., and
Uchiyama, A.: Laboratory studies on optical properties of secondary organic
aerosols generated during the photooxidation of toluene and the ozonolysis
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D24204,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014387" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd014387</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nikolov, I. D. and Ivanov, C. D.: Optical plastic refractive measurements
in the visible and the near-infrared regions, Appl. Optics, 39, 2067–2070, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.39.002067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.39.002067</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Omar, A. H., Winker, D. M., Vaughan, M. A., Hu, Y., Trepte, C. R., Ferrare,
R. A., Lee, K.-P., Hostetler, C. A., Kittaka, C., Rogers, R. R., Kuehn, R.
E., and Liu, Z.: The CALIPSO automated aerosol classification and lidar
ratio selection algorithm, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 1994–2014,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jtecha1231.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009jtecha1231.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pan, X., Ichoku, C., Chin, M., Bian, H., Darmenov, A., Colarco, P., Ellison, L., Kucsera, T., da Silva, A., Wang, J., Oda, T., and Cui, G.: Six global biomass burning emission datasets: intercomparison and application in one global aerosol model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 969–994, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-969-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-969-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Platt, U., Meinen, J., Pöhler, D., and Leisner, T.: Broadband Cavity Enhanced Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (CE-DOAS) – applicability and corrections, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 713–723, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-713-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2-713-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pokhrel, R. P., Wagner, N. L., Langridge, J. M., Lack, D. A., Jayarathne, T., Stone, E. A., Stockwell, C. E., Yokelson, R. J., and Murphy, S. M.: Parameterization of single-scattering albedo (SSA) and absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) with EC/OC for aerosol emissions from biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9549–9561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pósfai, M., Simonics, R., Li, J., Hobbs, P. V., and Buseck, P. R.:
Individual aerosol particles from biomass burning in southern Africa: 1.
Compositions and size distributions of carbonaceous particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, SAF 19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002291" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd002291</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A.,
Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G.
L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Kärcher, B.,
Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O.,
Loewenstein, M., and Aikin, K. C.: Single-particle measurements of
midlatitude black carbon and light-scattering aerosols from the boundary
layer to the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D16207,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007076" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007076</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R., Fahey, D. W., Gao, R. S., Lohmann, U.,
Stier, P., Watts, L. A., Thomson, D. S., Lack, D. A., Pfister, L., Mahoney,
M. J., Baumgardner, D., Wilson, J. C., and Reeves, J. M.: Coatings and their
enhancement of black carbon light absorption in the tropical atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D03203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009042</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Selimovic, V., Yokelson, R. J., Warneke, C., Roberts, J. M., de Gouw, J., Reardon, J., and Griffith, D. W. T.: Aerosol optical properties and trace gas emissions by PAX and OP-FTIR for laboratory-simulated western US wildfires during FIREX, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2929–2948, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2929-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2929-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7252?><ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Shardanand, and Rao, A. D. P.: Absolute Rayleigh scattering cross sections
of gases and freons of stratospheric interest in the visible and ultraviolet
regions, Technical Note D-8442, NASA Wallops Flight Center in Wallops Island, VA, USA, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smith, A. J. A. and Grainger, R. G.: Simplifying the calculation of light scattering properties for black carbon fractal aggregates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7825–7836, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7825-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7825-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sneep, M. and Ubachs, W.: Direct measurement of the Rayleigh scattering
cross section in various gases, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 92, 293–310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.07.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.07.025</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sorensen, C. M.: Light scattering by fractal aggregates: A review, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 35, 648–687, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820117868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820117868</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stockwell, C. E., Yokelson, R. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Robinson, A. L., DeMott, P. J., Sullivan, R. C., Reardon, J., Ryan, K. C., Griffith, D. W. T., and Stevens, L.: Trace gas emissions from combustion of peat, crop residue, domestic biofuels, grasses, and other fuels: configuration and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) component of the fourth Fire Lab at Missoula Experiment (FLAME-4), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9727–9754, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9727-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-9727-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Szymanski, W. W., Nagy, A., and Czitrovszky, A.: Optical particle
spectrometry – Problems and prospects, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110,
918–929, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.024</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thalman, R. and Volkamer, R.: Inherent calibration of a blue LED-CE-DOAS instrument to measure iodine oxide, glyoxal, methyl glyoxal, nitrogen dioxide, water vapour and aerosol extinction in open cavity mode, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1797–1814, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1797-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-1797-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Twomey, S.: Comparison of constrained linear inversion and an iterative
nonlinear algorithm applied to the indirect estimation of particle size
distributions, J. Comput. Phys., 18, 188–200,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(75)90028-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-9991(75)90028-5</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vandaele, A. C., Hermans, C., Simon, P. C., Carleer, M., Colin, R., Fally,
S., Mérienne, M. F., Jenouvrier, A., and Coquart, B.: Measurements of
the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption cross-section from 42 000 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10 000 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (238–1000 nm) at 220 and 294 K, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 59, 171–184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(97)00168-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-4073(97)00168-4</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Varma, R. M., Ball, S. M., Brauers, T., Dorn, H.-P., Heitmann, U., Jones, R. L., Platt, U., Pöhler, D., Ruth, A. A., Shillings, A. J. L., Thieser, J., Wahner, A., and Venables, D. S.: Light extinction by secondary organic aerosol: an intercomparison of three broadband cavity spectrometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3115–3130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3115-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-3115-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>von der Weiden, S.-L., Drewnick, F., and Borrmann, S.: Particle Loss Calculator – a new software tool for the assessment of the performance of aerosol inlet systems, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 479–494, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2-479-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Washenfelder, R. A., Langford, A. O., Fuchs, H., and Brown, S. S.: Measurement of glyoxal using an incoherent broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7779–7793, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7779-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-7779-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Washenfelder, R. A., Flores, J. M., Brock, C. A., Brown, S. S., and Rudich, Y.: Broadband measurements of aerosol extinction in the ultraviolet spectral region, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 861–877, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-861-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-861-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Brock, C. A., Guo, H., Xu, L., Weber,
R. J., Ng, N. L., Allen, H. M., Ayres, B. R., Baumann, K., Cohen, R. C.,
Draper, D. C., Duffey, K. C., Edgerton, E., Fry, J. L., Hu, W. W., Jimenez,
J. L., Palm, B. B., Romer, P., Stone, E. A., Wooldridge, P. J., and Brown,
S. S.: Biomass burning dominates brown carbon absorption in the rural
southeastern United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 653–664,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl062444" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014gl062444</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Flores, J. M., Zarzana, K. J., Rudich, Y., and Brown, S. S.: Broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy in the ultraviolet spectral region for measurements of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 41–52, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-41-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-41-2016</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Watson, J. G.: Visibility: Science and regulation, J. Air Waste Manage., 52, 628–713, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2002.10470813" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10473289.2002.10470813</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., and Swetnam, T. W.: Warming
and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity, Science,
313, 940–943, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1128834</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wiedinmyer, C., Quayle, B., Geron, C., Belote, A., McKenzie, D., Zhang, X.,
O'Neill, S., and Wynne, K. K.: Estimating emissions from fires in North
America for air quality modeling, Atmos. Environ., 40, 3419–3432,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.010</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Emmons, L. K., Al-Saadi, J. A., Orlando, J. J., and Soja, A. J.: The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 625–641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Kim, H., Parworth, C. L., Young, D. E., Zhang, Q., Metcalf, A.
R., and Cappa, C. D.: Optical Properties of Wintertime Aerosols from
Residential Wood Burning in Fresno, CA: Results from DISCOVER-AQ 2013,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 1681–1690, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04134" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b04134</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, W., Xu, X., Fang, B., Zhang, Q., Qian, X., Wang, S., Liu, P., Zhang,
W., Wang, Z., Liu, D., Huang, Y., Venables, D. S., and Chen, W.: Development
of an incoherent broad-band cavity-enhanced aerosol extinction spectrometer
and its application to measurement of aerosol optical hygroscopicity, Appl.
Optics, 56, 16–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.000E16" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.56.000E16</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Complex refractive indices in the ultraviolet and visible spectral region for highly absorbing non-spherical biomass burning aerosol</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Biomass burning aerosol is a major source of PM<sub>2.5</sub>,
and significantly affects Earth's radiative budget. The magnitude of its
radiative effect is poorly quantified due to uncertainty in the optical
properties of aerosol formed from biomass burning. Using a broadband cavity-enhanced spectrometer with a recently increased spectral range (360–720&thinsp;nm) coupled to a size-selecting aerosol inlet, we retrieve complex
refractive indices of aerosol throughout the near-ultraviolet and visible
spectral region. We demonstrate refractive index retrievals for two standard
aerosol samples: polystyrene latex spheres and ammonium sulfate. We then
retrieve refractive indices for biomass burning aerosol from 13 controlled
fires during the 2016 Missoula Fire Science Laboratory Study. We demonstrate
that the technique is highly sensitive to the accuracy of the aerosol size
distribution method and find that while we can constrain the optical
properties of brown carbon aerosol for many fires, fresh smoke dominated by
fractal-like black carbon aerosol presents unique challenges and is not
well-represented by Mie theory. For the 13 fires, we show that the accuracy
of Mie theory retrievals decreases as the fraction of black carbon mass
increases. At 475&thinsp;nm, the average refractive index is 1.635 (±0.056)
+0.06 (±0.12)<i>i</i>, and at 365&thinsp;nm, the average refractive index is 1.605
(±0.041) +0.038 (±0.074)<i>i</i>.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abo Riziq, A., Erlick, C., Dinar, E., and Rudich, Y.: Optical properties of absorbing and non-absorbing aerosols retrieved by cavity ring down (CRD) spectroscopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1523–1536, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1523-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1523-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Adler, G., Wagner, N. L., Lamb, K. D., Manfred, K. M., Schwarz, J. P.,
Franchin, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Washenfelder, R. A., Womack, C. C.,
Yokelson, R. J., and Murphy, D. M.: Evidence in biomass burning smoke for a
light-absorbing aerosol with properties intermediate between brown and black
carbon, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 976–989, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1617832" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1617832</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Attwood, A. R., Washenfelder, R. A., Brock, C. A., Hu, W., Baumann, K.,
Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Edgerton, E. S., Murphy, D. M., Palm, B. B.,
McComiskey, A., Wagner, N. L., de Sá, S. S., Ortega, A., Martin, S. T.,
Jimenez, J. L., and Brown, S. S.: Trends in sulfate and organic aerosol mass
in the Southeast U.S.: Impact on aerosol optical depth and radiative
forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 7701–7709,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl061669" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl061669</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bahreini, R., Dunlea, E. J., Matthew, B. M., Simons, C., Docherty, K. S.,
DeCarlo, P. F., Jimenez, J. L., Brock, C. A., and Middlebrook, A. M.: Design
and operation of a pressure-controlled inlet for airborne sampling with an
aerodynamic aerosol lens, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 465–471,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802178514" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802178514</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bahreini, R., Ervens, B., Middlebrook, A. M., Warneke, C., de Gouw, J. A.,
DeCarlo, P. F., Jimenez, J. L., Brock, C. A., Neuman, J. A., Ryerson, T. B.,
Stark, H., Atlas, E., Brioude, J., Fried, A., Holloway, J. S., Peischl, J.,
Richter, D., Walega, J., Weibring, P., Wollny, A. G., and Fehsenfeld, F. C.:
Organic aerosol formation in urban and industrial plumes near Houston and
Dallas, Texas, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00F16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011493" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011493</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bluvshtein, N., Flores, J. M., Riziq, A. A., and Rudich, Y.: An approach for
faster retrieval of aerosols' complex refractive index using cavity
ring-down spectroscopy, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 1140–1150,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.700141" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.700141</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bluvshtein, N., Lin, P., Flores, J. M., Segev, L., Mazar, Y., Tas, E.,
Snider, G., Weagle, C., Brown, S. S., Laskin, A., and Rudich, Y.: Broadband
optical properties of biomass-burning aerosol and identification of brown
carbon chromophores, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 5441–5456,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026230" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026230</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and scattering of light by
small particles, Wiley-Interscience, New York, USA, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light absorption by carbonaceous
particles: An investigative review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 27–67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor,
M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley,
P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmüller, H., Garro, M. A., Arnott, W. P., Walker,
J., Susott, R. A., Babbitt, R. E., Wold, C. E., Lincoln, E. N., and Hao, W.
M.: Emissions from the laboratory combustion of wildland fuels: Particle
morphology and size, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D07204,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006659" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006659</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmüller, H., Chen, L.-W. A., Lewis, K., Arnott, W. P., Mazzoleni, C., Dubey, M. K., Wold, C. E., Hao, W. M., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Brown carbon in tar balls from smoldering biomass combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6363–6370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chilton, J. E., Timko, R. J., and Chuhta, E. J.: Nitrogen dioxide
calibration standards for portable monitors, Information Circular 9482, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Department of Health and Human Services
Pittsburgh Research Laboratory
Pittsburg, PA, USA, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
China, S., Mazzoleni, C., Gorkowski, K., Aiken, A. C., and Dubey, M. K.:
Morphology and mixing state of individual freshly emitted wildfire
carbonaceous particles, Nat. Commun., 4, 2122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dennison, P. E., Brewer, S. C., Arnold, J. D., and Moritz, M. A.: Large
wildfire trends in the western United States, 1984–2011, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 2928–2933, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl059576" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl059576</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Dinar, E., Abo Riziq, A., Spindler, C., Erlick, C., Kiss, G., and Rudich,
Y.: The complex refractive index of atmospheric and model humic-like
substances (HULIS) retrieved by a cavity ring down aerosol spectrometer
(CRD-AS), Faraday Discuss., 137, 279–295, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B703111D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B703111D</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Farias, T. L., Köylü, Ü. Ö., and Carvalho, M. G.: Range of
validity of the Rayleigh-Debye-Gans theory for optics of fractal
aggregates, Appl. Optics, 35, 6560–6567,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.006560" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.006560</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fiedler, S. E., Hese, A., and Ruth, A. A.: Incoherent broad-band
cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy, Chem. Phys. Lett., 371, 284–294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(03)00263-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(03)00263-x</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Flores, J. M., Washenfelder, R. A., Adler, G., Lee, H. J., Segev, L.,
Laskin, J., Laskin, A., Nizkorodov, S. A., Brown, S. S., and Rudich, Y.:
Complex refractive indices in the near-ultraviolet spectral region of
biogenic secondary organic aerosol aged with ammonia, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 16, 10629–10642, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp01009d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp01009d</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Flores, J. M., Zhao, D. F., Segev, L., Schlag, P., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Fuchs, H., Watne, Å. K., Bluvshtein, N., Mentel, Th. F., Hallquist, M., and Rudich, Y.: Evolution of the complex refractive index in the UV spectral region in ageing secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5793–5806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5793-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5793-2014</a>, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Forrest, S. R. and Witten, T. A.: Long-range correlations in smoke-particle
aggregates, J. Phys. A-Math. Gen., 12, 109–117,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/12/5/008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/12/5/008</a>, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fuchs, H., Dubé, W. P., Lerner, B. M., Wagner, N. L., Williams, E. J.,
and Brown, S. S.: A sensitive and versatile detector for atmospheric
NO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> based on blue diode laser cavity ring-down
spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7831–7836,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es902067h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es902067h</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Garvey, D. M. and Pinnick, R. G.: Response characteristics of the particle
measuring systems active scattering aerosol spectrometer probe (ASASP-X),
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 2, 477–488, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828308958651" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828308958651</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Greenblatt, G. D., Orlando, J. J., Burkholder, J. B., and Ravishankara, A.
R.: Absorption measurements of oxygen between 330 and 1140&thinsp;nm, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 95, 18577–18582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD11p18577" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD11p18577</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
He, Q., Bluvshtein, N., Segev, L., Meidan, D., Flores, J. M., Brown, S. S.,
Brune, W., and Rudich, Y.: Evolution of the complex refractive index of
secondary organic aerosols during atmospheric aging, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 3456–3465, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05742" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05742</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hermans, C.: Measurement of absorption cross sections and spectroscopic molecular parameters, <a href="http://spectrolab.aeronomie.be/o2.htm" target="_blank"/> (last access:
26 October 2020), 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Huffman, J. A., Ziemann, P. J., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Development and characterization of a fast-stepping/scanning
thermodenuder for chemically-resolved aerosol volatility measurements,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 395–407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802104981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802104981</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Islam, M., Ciaffoni, L., Hancock, G., and Ritchie, G. A. D.: Demonstration
of a novel laser-driven light source for broadband spectroscopy between 170&thinsp;nm and 2.1&thinsp;µm, Analyst, 138, 4741–4745,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3AN01020A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C3AN01020A</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Knutson, E. O. and Whitby, K. T.: Aerosol classification by electric
mobility: apparatus, theory, and applications, J. Aerosol Sci., 6, 443–451, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(75)90060-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(75)90060-9</a>, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kondo, Y., Sahu, L., Moteki, N., Khan, F., Takegawa, N., Liu, X., Koike, M.,
and Miyakawa, T.: Consistency and traceability of black carbon measurements
made by laser-induced incandescence, thermal-optical transmittance, and
filter-based photo-absorption techniques, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 295–312, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.533215" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.533215</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kupc, A., Williamson, C., Wagner, N. L., Richardson, M., and Brock, C. A.: Modification, calibration, and performance of the Ultra-High Sensitivity Aerosol Spectrometer for particle size distribution and volatility measurements during the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) airborne campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 369–383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-369-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-369-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Lamarque, J.-F., Emmons, L. K., Hess, P. G., Kinnison, D. E., Tilmes, S., Vitt, F., Heald, C. L., Holland, E. A., Lauritzen, P. H., Neu, J., Orlando, J. J., Rasch, P. J., and Tyndall, G. K.: CAM-chem: description and evaluation of interactive atmospheric chemistry in the Community Earth System Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 369–411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-369-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-369-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric
brown carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., and Dubovik, O.: Global aerosol optical
properties and application to Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
aerosol retrieval over land, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D13210,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007815" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007815</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., He, Q., Hettiyadura, A. P. S., Käfer, U., Shmul, G., Meidan, D.,
Zimmermann, R., Brown, S. S., George, C., Laskin, A., and Rudich, Y.:
Formation of secondary brown carbon in biomass burning aerosol proxies
through NO<sub>3</sub> radical reactions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 1395–1405, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05641" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05641</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Pósfai, M., Hobbs, P. V., and Buseck, P. R.: Individual aerosol
particles from biomass burning in southern Africa: 2. Compositions and aging
of inorganic particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, SAF 20,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002310" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002310</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Liao, H., Adams, P. J., Chung, S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Mickley, L. J., and
Jacob, D. J.: Interactions between tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in a
unified general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001260" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001260</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Manfred, K. M., Washenfelder, R. A., Wagner, N. L., Adler, G., Erdesz, F., Womack, C. C., Lamb, K. D., Schwarz, J. P., Franchin, A., Selimovic, V., Yokelson, R. J., and Murphy, D. M.: Investigating biomass burning aerosol morphology using a laser imaging nephelometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1879–1894, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1879-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1879-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Markowski, G. R.: Improving Twomey's algorithm for inversion of aerosol
measurement data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 7, 127–141,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828708959153" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828708959153</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
McMeeking, G. R., Kreidenweis, S. M., Baker, S., Carrico, C. M., Chow, J.
C., Collett Jr., J. L., Hao, W. M., Holden, A. S., Kirchstetter, T. W.,
Malm, W. C., Moosmüller, H., Sullivan, A. P., and Wold, C. E.: Emissions
of trace gases and aerosols during the open combustion of biomass in the
laboratory, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D19210,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011836" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011836</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Miles, R. E. H., Rudić, S., Orr-Ewing, A. J., and Reid, J. P.:
Measurements of the wavelength dependent extinction of aerosols by cavity
ring down spectroscopy, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 12, 3914–3920,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B923758E" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B923758E</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Min, K.-E., Washenfelder, R. A., Dubé, W. P., Langford, A. O., Edwards, P. M., Zarzana, K. J., Stutz, J., Lu, K., Rohrer, F., Zhang, Y., and Brown, S. S.: A broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectrometer for aircraft measurements of glyoxal, methylglyoxal, nitrous acid, nitrogen dioxide, and water vapor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 423–440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-423-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-423-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Moise, T., Flores, J. M., and Rudich, Y.: Optical properties of secondary
organic aerosols and their changes by chemical processes, Chem. Rev., 115,
4400–4439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005259" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005259</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Moosmüller, H. and Arnott, W. P.: Particle optics in the rayleigh
regime, J. Air Waste Manage., 59, 1028–1031,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1028</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Moosmüller, H., Chakrabarty, R. K., and Arnott, W. P.: Aerosol light
absorption and its measurement: A review, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110,
844–878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.035</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Nakayama, T., Matsumi, Y., Sato, K., Imamura, T., Yamazaki, A., and
Uchiyama, A.: Laboratory studies on optical properties of secondary organic
aerosols generated during the photooxidation of toluene and the ozonolysis
of <i>α</i>-pinene, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D24204,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014387" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014387</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Nikolov, I. D. and Ivanov, C. D.: Optical plastic refractive measurements
in the visible and the near-infrared regions, Appl. Optics, 39, 2067–2070, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.39.002067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.39.002067</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Omar, A. H., Winker, D. M., Vaughan, M. A., Hu, Y., Trepte, C. R., Ferrare,
R. A., Lee, K.-P., Hostetler, C. A., Kittaka, C., Rogers, R. R., Kuehn, R.
E., and Liu, Z.: The CALIPSO automated aerosol classification and lidar
ratio selection algorithm, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 1994–2014,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jtecha1231.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jtecha1231.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, X., Ichoku, C., Chin, M., Bian, H., Darmenov, A., Colarco, P., Ellison, L., Kucsera, T., da Silva, A., Wang, J., Oda, T., and Cui, G.: Six global biomass burning emission datasets: intercomparison and application in one global aerosol model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 969–994, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-969-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-969-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Platt, U., Meinen, J., Pöhler, D., and Leisner, T.: Broadband Cavity Enhanced Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (CE-DOAS) – applicability and corrections, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 713–723, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-713-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-713-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Pokhrel, R. P., Wagner, N. L., Langridge, J. M., Lack, D. A., Jayarathne, T., Stone, E. A., Stockwell, C. E., Yokelson, R. J., and Murphy, S. M.: Parameterization of single-scattering albedo (SSA) and absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) with EC/OC for aerosol emissions from biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9549–9561, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Pósfai, M., Simonics, R., Li, J., Hobbs, P. V., and Buseck, P. R.:
Individual aerosol particles from biomass burning in southern Africa: 1.
Compositions and size distributions of carbonaceous particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, SAF 19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002291" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002291</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A.,
Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G.
L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Kärcher, B.,
Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O.,
Loewenstein, M., and Aikin, K. C.: Single-particle measurements of
midlatitude black carbon and light-scattering aerosols from the boundary
layer to the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D16207,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007076" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007076</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R., Fahey, D. W., Gao, R. S., Lohmann, U.,
Stier, P., Watts, L. A., Thomson, D. S., Lack, D. A., Pfister, L., Mahoney,
M. J., Baumgardner, D., Wilson, J. C., and Reeves, J. M.: Coatings and their
enhancement of black carbon light absorption in the tropical atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D03203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009042</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Selimovic, V., Yokelson, R. J., Warneke, C., Roberts, J. M., de Gouw, J., Reardon, J., and Griffith, D. W. T.: Aerosol optical properties and trace gas emissions by PAX and OP-FTIR for laboratory-simulated western US wildfires during FIREX, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2929–2948, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2929-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2929-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Shardanand, and Rao, A. D. P.: Absolute Rayleigh scattering cross sections
of gases and freons of stratospheric interest in the visible and ultraviolet
regions, Technical Note D-8442, NASA Wallops Flight Center in Wallops Island, VA, USA, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, A. J. A. and Grainger, R. G.: Simplifying the calculation of light scattering properties for black carbon fractal aggregates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7825–7836, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7825-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7825-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Sneep, M. and Ubachs, W.: Direct measurement of the Rayleigh scattering
cross section in various gases, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 92, 293–310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.07.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.07.025</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Sorensen, C. M.: Light scattering by fractal aggregates: A review, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 35, 648–687, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820117868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820117868</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Stockwell, C. E., Yokelson, R. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Robinson, A. L., DeMott, P. J., Sullivan, R. C., Reardon, J., Ryan, K. C., Griffith, D. W. T., and Stevens, L.: Trace gas emissions from combustion of peat, crop residue, domestic biofuels, grasses, and other fuels: configuration and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) component of the fourth Fire Lab at Missoula Experiment (FLAME-4), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9727–9754, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9727-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9727-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Szymanski, W. W., Nagy, A., and Czitrovszky, A.: Optical particle
spectrometry – Problems and prospects, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110,
918–929, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.024</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Thalman, R. and Volkamer, R.: Inherent calibration of a blue LED-CE-DOAS instrument to measure iodine oxide, glyoxal, methyl glyoxal, nitrogen dioxide, water vapour and aerosol extinction in open cavity mode, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1797–1814, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1797-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1797-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Twomey, S.: Comparison of constrained linear inversion and an iterative
nonlinear algorithm applied to the indirect estimation of particle size
distributions, J. Comput. Phys., 18, 188–200,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(75)90028-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(75)90028-5</a>, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Vandaele, A. C., Hermans, C., Simon, P. C., Carleer, M., Colin, R., Fally,
S., Mérienne, M. F., Jenouvrier, A., and Coquart, B.: Measurements of
the NO<sub>2</sub> absorption cross-section from 42&thinsp;000&thinsp;cm<sup>−1</sup> to 10&thinsp;000&thinsp;cm<sup>−1</sup> (238–1000&thinsp;nm) at 220 and 294&thinsp;K, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 59, 171–184, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(97)00168-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(97)00168-4</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Varma, R. M., Ball, S. M., Brauers, T., Dorn, H.-P., Heitmann, U., Jones, R. L., Platt, U., Pöhler, D., Ruth, A. A., Shillings, A. J. L., Thieser, J., Wahner, A., and Venables, D. S.: Light extinction by secondary organic aerosol: an intercomparison of three broadband cavity spectrometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3115–3130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3115-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3115-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
von der Weiden, S.-L., Drewnick, F., and Borrmann, S.: Particle Loss Calculator – a new software tool for the assessment of the performance of aerosol inlet systems, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 479–494, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Washenfelder, R. A., Langford, A. O., Fuchs, H., and Brown, S. S.: Measurement of glyoxal using an incoherent broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7779–7793, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7779-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7779-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Washenfelder, R. A., Flores, J. M., Brock, C. A., Brown, S. S., and Rudich, Y.: Broadband measurements of aerosol extinction in the ultraviolet spectral region, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 861–877, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-861-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-861-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Brock, C. A., Guo, H., Xu, L., Weber,
R. J., Ng, N. L., Allen, H. M., Ayres, B. R., Baumann, K., Cohen, R. C.,
Draper, D. C., Duffey, K. C., Edgerton, E., Fry, J. L., Hu, W. W., Jimenez,
J. L., Palm, B. B., Romer, P., Stone, E. A., Wooldridge, P. J., and Brown,
S. S.: Biomass burning dominates brown carbon absorption in the rural
southeastern United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 653–664,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl062444" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl062444</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Flores, J. M., Zarzana, K. J., Rudich, Y., and Brown, S. S.: Broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy in the ultraviolet spectral region for measurements of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 41–52, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-41-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-41-2016</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, J. G.: Visibility: Science and regulation, J. Air Waste Manage., 52, 628–713, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2002.10470813" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2002.10470813</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., and Swetnam, T. W.: Warming
and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity, Science,
313, 940–943, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128834</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Wiedinmyer, C., Quayle, B., Geron, C., Belote, A., McKenzie, D., Zhang, X.,
O'Neill, S., and Wynne, K. K.: Estimating emissions from fires in North
America for air quality modeling, Atmos. Environ., 40, 3419–3432,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.010</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Emmons, L. K., Al-Saadi, J. A., Orlando, J. J., and Soja, A. J.: The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 625–641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Kim, H., Parworth, C. L., Young, D. E., Zhang, Q., Metcalf, A.
R., and Cappa, C. D.: Optical Properties of Wintertime Aerosols from
Residential Wood Burning in Fresno, CA: Results from DISCOVER-AQ 2013,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 1681–1690, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04134" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04134</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, W., Xu, X., Fang, B., Zhang, Q., Qian, X., Wang, S., Liu, P., Zhang,
W., Wang, Z., Liu, D., Huang, Y., Venables, D. S., and Chen, W.: Development
of an incoherent broad-band cavity-enhanced aerosol extinction spectrometer
and its application to measurement of aerosol optical hygroscopicity, Appl.
Optics, 56, 16–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.000E16" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.000E16</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
