<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-6721-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Isotopic compositions of atmospheric total gaseous mercury in 10 Chinese
cities and implications for land surface emissions</article-title><alt-title>TGM isotopic compositions in 10 Chinese cities</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{TGM isotopic compositions in 10 Chinese cities}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{X. Fu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>Xuewu</given-names></name>
          <email>fuxuewu@mail.gyig.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5174-7150</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Hui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Yue</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Hui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jun</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-1642</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Lyu</surname><given-names>Xiaopu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Gan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3306-1008</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Hai</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7996-7294</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Xun</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7407-8965</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Leiming</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5437-5412</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Xinbin</given-names></name>
          <email>fengxinbin@vip.skleg.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-8998</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of
Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Guiyang 550081, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>CAS Center for Excellence in Quaternary Science and Global Change,
Xi'an 710061, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of
Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong
Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Air Quality Research Division, Science and Technology Branch,
Environment and Climate Change Canada,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Toronto, Ontario, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Xuewu Fu (fuxuewu@mail.gyig.ac.cn) and Xinbin
Feng (fengxinbin@vip.skleg.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>6721</fpage><lpage>6734</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>September</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>7</day><month>January</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e222">Land surface emissions are an important source of atmospheric total gaseous
mercury (TGM); however, its role on the variations of TGM isotopic
compositions and concentrations has not been properly evaluated. In this
study, TGM isotope compositions, a powerful tracer for sources and
transformation of Hg, were measured at 10 urban sites and one rural site in
China. TGM concentrations were higher in summer than in winter in most
cities except in Guiyang and Guangzhou in the low latitudes. The summertime
high TGM concentrations  coincided with prevailing low TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and high TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg signatures. These seasonal
patterns were in contrast with those typically observed in rural areas in
the Northern Hemisphere, suggesting that atmospheric oxidation chemistry,
vegetation activity and residential coal combustion were likely not
the dominant mechanisms contributing to the TGM concentration and isotopic
composition seasonality in Chinese cities. The amplitudes of seasonal
variations in TGM concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (or TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg) were significantly positively (or negatively) correlated with
that of the simulated soil GEM emission flux. These results suggest that the
seasonal variations in TGM isotopic compositions and concentrations in the
10 Chinese cities were likely controlled by land surface emissions that
were observed or reported with highly negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg
signatures.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e289">Mercury (Hg) is a toxic heavy metal pollutant of global concern for
ecological and human health. Hg in the atmosphere includes three major
forms: gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM) and
particulate bound mercury (PBM). According to global Hg models, GEM is the
dominant form of total gaseous mercury (TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GEM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GOM,
88.8 %–92.9 %) and total Hg (88.8 %–92.8 %) in
the troposphere (Selin et al., 2007; Holmes et al., 2010; Horowitz et
al., 2017), and the fraction of GEM in total atmospheric Hg is thought to be
much higher in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) (e.g., on average
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) than that in the free troposphere (Swartzendruber et
al., 2009; Lyman and Jaffe, 2012; Shah et al., 2016). GEM has a long
atmospheric residence time and can transport globally through the atmosphere
(Obrist et al., 2018). GEM can be deposited onto Earth's surface by dry
deposition or atmospheric oxidation followed by wet and dry deposition. Once
deposited, it can be transformed to<?pagebreak page6722?> methylmercury and subsequently
bioaccumulated in the food web, posing a threat to human health and the
environment (Obrist et al., 2018). GEM in the atmosphere can be derived
from primary anthropogenic, natural and legacy emissions. Land surface
emissions are an important source of atmospheric GEM. Total GEM emissions
from global land surfaces, although not well constrained, are estimated to
range from 600 to 2000 Mg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are similar in magnitude to the
global primary anthropogenic GEM emissions (Selin et al., 2007; Holmes et
al., 2010; Pirrone et al., 2010; Agnan et al., 2016). However, to what
extent the land surface emissions can contribute to the variations of GEM at
local, regional and global scales has not been well understood.</p>
      <p id="d1e328">TGM or GEM concentrations in urban areas are generally elevated as compared
to rural areas (Fu et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016), which could be
attributed to strong Hg emissions from primary anthropogenic sources, urban
surfaces (soil, pavement and building surfaces, mainly referred to as
“legacy” emissions) and indoor Hg-containing products (Carpi and Chen,
2001; Feng et al., 2005; Eckley and Branfireun, 2008; Rutter et al., 2009).
A previous study in Mexico City, Mexico, based on pollution roses and
concentration field analysis (CFA), suggested that highly elevated GEM
concentrations (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were dominantly (81 %)
attributed to anthropogenic sources (Rutter et al., 2009). The large
percentage of anthropogenic source contributions, however, might have been
supplemented by volcanic emissions and re-emission of Hg previously
deposited to urban surfaces in anthropogenic source regions (Rutter et
al., 2009). On the other hand, TGM concentrations in New York, USA (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.90 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and Nanjing, China (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.9 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), were
observed to be positively correlated with air temperature and/or the
intensity of solar radiation, implying that land surface emissions
contributed to elevated TGM levels (Carpi and Chen, 2002; Zhu et al.,
2012). This hypothesis has not considered the atmospheric transport patterns
and temporal variations in anthropogenic emissions at local and regional
scales and needs to be further validated. GOM is a potential proxy of
anthropogenic sources. However, GOM has a short atmospheric residence time
and could also be produced via in situ oxidation of GEM, making it
challenging to identify the contributions of anthropogenic sources to TGM or
GEM in many urban areas using GOM observations (Lynam and Keeler, 2005;
Peterson et al., 2009; Rutter et al., 2009). Relative contributions from
specific sources in urban areas could be also assessed by development of TGM
or GEM emission inventories of different source categories. For example,
total GEM emissions from soils in Guiyang, China, were scaled up based on an
empirical model and were similar in magnitude to those from anthropogenic
sources (Feng et al., 2005). Such approaches, however, are very limited
in many urban areas in China and other countries worldwide. Therefore, the
understanding of the sources of TGM or GEM in urban areas is essentially
limited and there is a need to develop an additional tracer to identify the
controls of specific sources on the variations of TGM or GEM in urban areas.</p>
      <p id="d1e389">The Hg stable isotope is a rapidly growing tool for studying the biogeochemical
cycle of Hg in the environment (Blum and Johnson, 2017). Hg isotopes
in Earth surface systems can undergo both mass-dependent fractionation (MDF;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg signature) and mass-independent fractionation (MIF;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg
signatures), which might be caused by a specific or multiple sources and
transformation processes (Blum et al., 2014). Previous studies found that
Chinese coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) emitted GEM with slightly negative
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) and significantly
negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) values
(Tang et al., 2017; H. W. Liu et al., 2019). Based on the observed isotopic
compositions of global source materials, fractionation of Hg isotopes during
industrial processes and global Hg emission inventory, R. Y. Sun et al. (2016) predicted a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for the global primary anthropogenic GEM
emissions in 2010. On the other hand, isotopic compositions of indoor GEM
and GEM emitted from urban building surfaces were characterized by highly
negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and near zero to slightly positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values
(means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00 ‰ to 0.17 ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Jiskra et al., 2019a). Isotopic compositions of GEM
emitted from urban soils currently remain unknown. Global Hg isotope models
proposed this source would have highly negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (e.g.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) and positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg
signatures (e.g., <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>) (Sonke,
2011; Sun et al., 2019). Therefore, GEM emitted from anthropogenic sources
is probably isotopically distinguishable from that emitted from land
surfaces and indoor Hg-containing products, which provide an useful tracer
for identification of TGM or GEM sources in urban areas.</p>
      <?pagebreak page6723?><p id="d1e665">Previous studies have measured the isotopic compositions of TGM or GEM at
many rural and a few urbanized sites in the Northern Hemisphere (Gratz et
al., 2010; Sherman et al., 2010; Demers et al., 2013, 2015;
Enrico et al., 2016; Fu et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2016; Obrist et al., 2017;
Xu et al., 2017; Fu et al., 2018, 2019; Jiskra et al., 2019a, b). According to these studies, TGM or GEM isotopic
compositions in urban areas showed a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.28 ‰ and a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg of 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 ‰ (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which were much
lower and higher, respectively, than the mean values observed in rural areas
(mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.45 ‰, mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The lower TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg signatures in urban areas relative to rural areas were
previously hypothesized to be mainly related to primary anthropogenic
emissions, whereas the effect of emission and re-emission of GEM from urban
surfaces was frequently neglected mainly because of the strong primary
anthropogenic Hg emissions and poor understanding of emission flux and
isotopic signatures of GEM from land surfaces in urban areas. It should be
noted that many observational TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values in urban areas
(e.g., Beijing and Guiyang of China) or in urbanized and industrial plumes
were far more negative than that estimated for anthropogenic emissions
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) (R. Y. Sun et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2016; Fu et
al., 2018). This indicates that primary anthropogenic emissions were not the
exclusive explanation for the highly negative TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg
signatures in the urban atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e870">In this study, TGM concentrations and isotopic compositions were measured in
10 Chinese cities in summer and winter 2018, providing a unique opportunity
for studying the spatial and seasonal variations in TGM concentrations and
isotopic compositions in urban areas of China. Isotopic compositions of GEM
emitted from soils were also measured in two Chinese cities and, together
with data in literature, were used to investigate the role of land surface
emissions in the seasonal and spatial variations in TGM concentrations and
isotopic compositions in major Chinese cities. The findings in this study
are helpful for a better understanding of the sources of atmospheric TGM in
urban areas of China and the knowledge gained emphasizes the need to mitigate
surface Hg emissions during implementation of the Minamata Convention.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study sites</title>
      <p id="d1e888">Ten cities including Beijing, Shijiazhuang, and Jinan in northern China, Lanzhou
in northwestern China, Zhengzhou and Wuhan in central China, Shanghai in
eastern China, Chengdu and Guiyang in southwestern China, and Guangzhou in
southern China were selected for measuring TGM concentrations and isotopic
compositions (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). These cities are located in different geographical
regions of China, which were potentially characterized by specific source
emission patterns, climate, and atmospheric chemistry. The designated
investigations in these cities may therefore provide comprehensive
information on the variations of TGM concentrations and isotopic
compositions in the megacities of China and help to explore the major factors
influencing the atmospheric TGM in Chinese cities. Site locations,
information about the 10 cities and sampling periods are given in Table S1 in the Supplement.
Briefly, these cities have populations of  3.75 to 21.54 million in
urban areas. Fractions of the urban and construction land area out of the total
land area of a 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid surrounding the
sampling sites ranged from 4.9 % to 41.1 % (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.5 %), whereas
the remaining land surfaces are mainly croplands, barren lands, open
grassland, open shrublands and open forests (range from 35.6 % to
82.3 % with a mean of 57.5 %) (Fig. S2 and Table S1 in the Supplement). In each of the
10 cities, one sampling site was selected for measuring TGM concentrations
and isotopic compositions. The sampling sites are generally located in
heavily commercial and residential areas in all the cities and with no major
industrial Hg emission sources within 2 km of the sampling sites. All the
measurements were conducted on building roofs at elevations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m. In order to investigate the shift of GEM isotopic compositions in
urban areas relative to that in remote areas due to local urbanized
emissions, the same type of measurements were also conducted at the rural
Waliguan Baseline Observatory in northwestern China (Mt. Waliguan), which
belongs to the World Meteorological Organization's (WMO) Global Atmospheric
Watch (GAW) network (Fig. S1 in the Supplement).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Sampling of TGM</title>
      <p id="d1e941">In this study, chlorine-impregnated activated carbon (CLC; 0.5 g) traps were
used to collect atmospheric TGM samples (Fu et al., 2014). A schematic
diagram of the sampling system is shown in Fig. S3 in the Supplement. Briefly, particles in
ambient air were first removed using a Teflon filter (47 mm diameter; 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size) at the inlet of the sampling system, and then ambient TGM
were trapped onto the CLC traps at a flow rate of <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> using a Teflon-coated mini-diaphragm vacuum pump (N89 KTDC, KNF
Inc.). The sampling flow rate was adjusted using a needle valve installed at
the outlet of the vacuum pump. The inlet of the sampling system was about
1.5 m above the surface. Daily (24 h) continuous sampling of TGM at each
urban site lasted for approximately 1 week in the winter and summer of
2018, respectively (daily samples; Table S1 in the Supplement). The wintertime samplings were
conducted from 5 to 15 January 2018 simultaneously in Beijing, Shijiazhuang,
Jinan, Lanzhou and Zhengzhou, and from 18 to 27 January 2018 simultaneously
in Shanghai, Chengdu, Wuhan, Guiyang and Guangzhou. The summertime
samplings were conducted from 29 June to 7 July 2018 simultaneously in
Shijiazhuang, Jinan, Zhengzhou, Guiyang and Guangzhou, and from 27 July to
10 August 2018 simultaneously in Beijing, Lanzhou, Shanghai, Wuhan and
Chengdu. TGM samples were also continuously collected from 19 November 2014
to 19 February 2015 at Mt. Waliguan with a sampling duration of 10 d.
After field sampling, CLC traps were sealed carefully and kept in a sealed
polypropylene crisper before sample processing for Hg isotope analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e976">GOM concentrations are generally elevated in Chinese urban areas due to
local primary anthropogenic emissions (Fu et al., 2015). Previous studies
showed that GOM measured using a Tekran 2537/1130/1135 system on average
accounted for 0.37 % to 0.50 % of TGM in Guiyang, Beijing and Shanghai,
China, while the daily GOM fractions in TGM ranged from 0.04 % to 1.58 % in
Guiyang (Table S2 in the Supplement) (Fu et al., 2011; Duan et al., 2017; Zhang et al.,
2019). It is likely that the Tekran system could underestimate GOM
concentrations by approximately 3-fold with respect to that measured by
other recently developed methods (e.g., cation exchange membranes (CEMs) or
nylon membranes) (Huang et al., 2013; Gustin et al., 2015,
2019). To<?pagebreak page6724?> date, GOM has not been measured by CEM or nylon membranes in
Chinese urban areas. If adjusting GOM concentrations by a factor of 3, the
abovementioned mean GOM fractions would be increased to 1.1 %–1.5 % in
Guiyang, Beijing and Shanghai, and these values are similar to those
observed in Reno, Nevada, USA, based on the CEM method (mean GOM fraction of
2.7 %) (Gustin et al., 2019). Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg of TGM in urban areas of this study ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰,
respectively. Assuming that the isotope composition of GOM resemble those of
primary anthropogenic emissions (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) (R. Y. Sun et al.,
2016), a maximum GOM fraction of TGM (5 %) would lead to negligible
shifts in TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to 0.01 ‰) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to 0.003 ‰). Therefore, TGM
isotopic composition measured in this study would not be biased
significantly by GOM compounds. The use of the terms “TGM” and
“GEM” interchangeably in this and previous studies would not significantly confound the
intercomparison of isotopic composition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Sample processing and TGM analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1149">Before the analysis of Hg concentration and isotopic composition, TGM
collected on CLC traps were preconcentrated into 5 mL of 2HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1HCl
mixed acid solution (40 %) following previous studies (Biswas et al.,
2008; Sun et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2014). Trapping solution Hg
concentrations were measured by a Tekran 2500 Hg analyzer following US EPA
Method 1631 (USEPA, 2002). TGM concentrations of the samples were
calculated using Eq. (1):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M89" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TGM</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">solution</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where TGM is the atmospheric TGM concentration in ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Hg
concentration in the trap solution in ng mL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">solution</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume
of the trap solution in mL and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the cumulative sampling air volume
in m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Full procedural blanks of field sampling and preconcentration
were measured at each sampling site and in each season by combustion of
sealed field CLC traps (containing 0.5 g CLC) prepared before field
sampling. The mean Hg concentration in these sealed field blanks was 0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09 ng (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table S3 in the Supplement), which was negligible
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) compared to the Hg in trapping solutions of samples.
Breakthrough tests showed that 96.7 % to 99.6 % (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 98.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 %, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of TGM in ambient air could be collected by
the CLC traps in our experiment setting (Table S3 in the Supplement). Recoveries of the
preconcentration were tested by combustion of lichen CRM (BCR 482), which
showed a mean value of 92.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9 % (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table S3 in the Supplement).
Standard additions of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> vapor (5 to 25 ng; produced by SnCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
reduction of diluted NIST 3133 solutions) to CLC traps at the 2.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> sampling flow rate showed a mean recovery of 93.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.8 % (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table S3 in the Supplement) for the sampling and
preconcentration method. These tests indicate that the above method is
reliable and efficient for measuring TGM concentrations and isotopic
compositions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>TGM isotope analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1423">Prior to isotope analysis, the concentrations of Hg in trap solution were
diluted to 0.5 or 1.0 ng mL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> using the 2HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1HCl mixed acid
solution (20 %). Isotope ratios of Hg in diluted trap solutions were
measured by cold-vapor multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometry (CV-MC-ICPMS) using a Nu Plasma (Nu Instruments) and a Neptune
(Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the Institute of Geochemistry, CAS (Guiyang,
China) (Fu et al., 2019). TGM isotopic compositions were
calculated following Eqs. (2) and (3) (Blum and Bergquist, 2007):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M116" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TGM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">198</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">198</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mtext>NIST 3133</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TGM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the MDF signatures of TGM in per mil
(‰), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass number of Hg isotopes (199, 200, 201,
202, and 204), (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">198</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the isotope ratios for
TGM samples and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">198</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>NIST 3133</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the isotope
ratios for the bracketing NIST 3133 standard (concentrations matched within
10 % of the sample trapping solution Hg concentrations).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M128" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TGM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TGM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TGM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TGM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the MIF signatures of TGM isotopes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">204</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg in per mil (‰),
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are 0.252, 0.5024, 0.752 and 1.493 for isotopes
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">204</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg, respectively (Blum
and Bergquist, 2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e1833">Isotopic compositions of NIST 3177 Hg standard <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>, lichen CRM (BCR
482, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and standard additions of NIST 3133 Hg to CLC traps (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Table S3 in the Supplement) were analyzed periodically during TGM isotope analysis, and
the results were consistent with previously reported values or the original
values of the NIST 3133 Hg standard (Table S3 in the Supplement) (Enrico et al., 2016; G. Sun
et al., 2016; Blum and Johnson, 2017). In the present study, we report the
analytical uncertainties (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of TGM isotopic compositions as the
2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the sample replicates when they are higher than the
2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of standard addition of NIST 3133 Hg to CLC traps. When
the 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the sample replicates were lower than the standard
additions of NIST 3133 Hg to CLC traps, 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the standard
additions of NIST 3133 Hg to CLC traps were used to represent the 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
of TGM isotopic compositions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Ancillary parameters and statistical methods</title>
      <p id="d1e1928">Data for concentrations of ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and carbon monoxide (CO) during
the sampling periods were extracted from<?pagebreak page6725?> national air quality monitoring
stations (<uri>http://106.37.208.233:20035/</uri>, last access: 8 February 2020) located within 1.5 km
of the sites, with the exception of the sampling site in Guangzhou (4.1 km).
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) around the sampling sites
(1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was obtained from the NASA Earth
Observations (NEO, <uri>https://neo.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>, last access: 30 March 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e1972">In order to investigate the effect of soil emissions on the variations in
TGM concentrations and isotopic compositions, GEM exchange flux between soil
and atmosphere at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution at each
sampling site in July and January were extracted from the gridded land
surface emission inventory in China simulated for 2013, which has a spatial
resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km and a monthly temporal resolution
(Fig. S1 in the Supplement) (Wang et al., 2016). This model established a new
scheme for estimating soil–atmosphere GEM flux, which has taken into account the
effect of photochemical and nonphotochemical reduction of Hg(II) in soil,
diffusion of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from soil to atmosphere as well as the temperature,
moisture, organic matter contents, PH, Hg concentration, bulk density and
land cover of soils, etc. (for more detail see Wang et al., 2016). Note that the simulated
surface emission inventory does not include GEM emissions from pavement,
building surfaces and indoor Hg-containing products. These sources are in
close proximity to the sampling sites (Fig. S2 in the Supplement), and their effect is also
interpreted in Sect. 3.4.</p>
      <p id="d1e2019">Daily isotopic compositions of GEM emitted from hillslope barren soil in
Guiyang (114.269<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 30.488<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and from agricultural
soil in Wuhan (114.269<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 30.488<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) from 29 July to 3 August 2019 and from 24 to 27 August 2019, respectively, obtained by measuring the
GEM isotopic compositions at the inlet and outlet of a dynamic flux chamber,
was followed by a calculation based on the binary mixing model (Eqs. 4 and 5):

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M162" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">emission</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=""><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">outlet</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">outlet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inlet</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inlet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>÷</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">outlet</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inlet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" columnspacing="1em" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">emission</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">outlet</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">outlet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open=""><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inlet</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inlet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>÷</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">outlet</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GEM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inlet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the mass number of Hg isotopes (199, 200, 201, 202 (not
for the MIF signature) and 204), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>GEM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">outlet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>GEM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">outlet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the MDF and MIF values of GEM at the outlet,
respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>GEM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inlet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>GEM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inlet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the MDF and MIF values of GEM at the inlet,
respectively, and GEM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">outlet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and GEM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inlet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the GEM
concentrations measured at the outlet and inlet, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e2406">Linear regression analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics using the
forced entry method.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>TGM concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e2426">Mean TGM concentrations at the urban sites during the study periods ranged
from 2.34 to 4.56 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
3.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.79 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1). These values were 1.5 to 3.0 times
higher than the mean background value of 1.51 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2014 in the
Northern Hemisphere obtained from the Global Mercury Observation System
(GMOS) (Sprovieri et al., 2016) and 1.2 to 2.4 times higher than the
mean value of 1.94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.64 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at urban
sites in North America and Europe (Mao et al., 2016). Mean TGM
concentrations observed at some urban sites were, however, 44 %–55 % lower
than previously reported mean values for earlier years, e.g., 4.19 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Shanghai in 2014, 8.88 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Guiyang in 2010 and
4.60 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Guangzhou in 2011 (Chen et al., 2013; Fu and Feng,
2015; Duan et al., 2017), likely due to a combination of several factors
such as decreased anthropogenic emissions (K. Y. Liu et al., 2019), different
sampling locations even inside the same city and different sampling times
and durations of the year. The declining TGM concentration (by 40 %) in
recent years (2014–2016) has indeed been reported in Chongming Island,
Shanghai (Tang et al., 2018), which has been mostly attributed to reduced
anthropogenic Hg emissions in China. Such emission reductions would impact
more on urban than rural areas in atmospheric TGM (K. Y. Liu et al., 2019).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2567">TGM mean concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at
the 10 urban sites (brown circle) and one rural site (blue circle) in China
during the whole study period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/6721/2021/acp-21-6721-2021-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>TGM isotopic compositions</title>
      <?pagebreak page6726?><p id="d1e2642">Figure 2 shows the isotopic compositions of daily TGM samples collected at
the 10 urban sites and one rural site. Large variations in daily TGM isotopic
compositions were observed with values ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to
0.63 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to
0.10 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (Fig. 2 and Table S4 in the Supplement).
Mean TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values were the lowest in Guiyang (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.42 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), Lanzhou (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.35 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Chengdu (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in southwestern and northwestern
China, followed by Wuhan (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23 ‰,
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Zhengzhou (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in central China, Shijiazhuang (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Jinan (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.42 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in northern China, coastal Guangzhou
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in southern China,
coastal Shanghai (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.35 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in
eastern China, and was the highest in Beijing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in northern China (Fig. 1 and
Table S5 in the Supplement). Much smaller spatial variations were seen in mean TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg than TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg. The highest mean TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg were observed in Guiyang (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Chengdu (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas values at the other urban
sites ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Mean TGM
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 ‰,
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) values measured at rural Mt. Waliguan in winter were higher (or
lower) than that in most cities in winter, with the exception of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg in Beijing and Shanghai (means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to
-0.07 ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg in
Shijiazhuang, Jinan, and Shanghai (means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where TGM concentrations were low
(means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.88 to 2.12 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and comparable to that at rural Mt.
Waliguan (Table S5 in the Supplement). Mean TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values at the urban sites
were all indistinguishable from zero (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to 0.02 ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table S5 in the Supplement), a phenomenon that is similar to previous observations in
urban areas in China and the USA (means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to 0.01 ‰ ,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Gratz et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2017).
Therefore, we do not further interpret the MIF of even-mass Hg isotopes in
this study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3327">Mass-dependent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg) and mass-independent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg) signatures of daily TGM samples collected in the present study
(circle) with error bars representing 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> analytical uncertainty. The
shaded areas are the literature-based mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg of TGM or GEM measured in rural areas of
China (light green) and Europe and North America (light blue) as well as
those estimated for anthropogenic emissions (yellow) (Gratz et al., 2010;
Sherman et al., 2010; Demers et al., 2013, 2015; Enrico et
al., 2016; Fu et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2016; Obrist et al., 2017; Xu et al.,
2017; Fu et al., 2018, 2019; Jiskra et al., 2019a, b). The dotted line represents the linear regression between TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg measured in the present study (ANOVA,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/6721/2021/acp-21-6721-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3449">Mean values of TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg in this study
were similar to those reported at urban sites in China in previous studies,
e.g., negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and close to zero <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg
(means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to 0.04 ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Beijing, Xi'an
and Guiyang (Yu et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2017). On the other hand, mean
TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values in this study were 0.44 ‰ to
1.60 ‰ lower than the values reported for rural areas of
China (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.40 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and North America and Europe (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas mean TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values were 0.02 ‰ to 0.18 ‰ higher than the
means in rural areas of China (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and North America and Europe (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 ‰, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 2)
(Gratz et al., 2010; Demers et al., 2013, 2015; Enrico et
al., 2016; Fu et al., 2016; Obrist et al., 2017; Fu et al., 2018,
2019; Jiskra et al., 2019b). Apparently, atmospheric TGM is isotopically
distinguishable between urban and rural sites and between different regions
of the world, providing a potentially valuable tracer for understanding the
sources and transformations of atmospheric Hg at local, regional and global
scales. As shown in Fig. 2, some of the daily TGM isotopic compositions
(i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg signatures) fell
between the end-member TGM isotopic compositions estimated for
anthropogenic TGM emissions and observed from background areas, suggesting
mixed influences on TGM isotopic compositions between anthropogenic
emissions and background atmospheric pool (Demers et al., 2015; Fu et
al., 2016; Xu et al., 2017; Fu et al., 2018). There were, however, many
exceptions with daily TGM isotopic compositions outside the abovementioned
range, e.g., with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg lower than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (Fig. 2).
Thus, additional sources and environmental processes should have also
contributed to the variations in TGM isotopic compositions in urban
environments of China.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>TGM isotopic compositions estimated for urbanized source end-members and
measured for soil emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e3791">Mean TGM concentrations at the urban sites (2.37 to 4.56 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were highly elevated compared to the background value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Northern Hemisphere (Sprovieri et al., 2016).
This could be attributed to local and regional Hg sources including Hg
emissions from primary anthropogenic sources, land surfaces (e.g., soil,
building, and pavement) and indoor Hg-containing products. As shown in
Fig. 2, TGM isotopic compositions in the cities were probably controlled
by a binary physical mixing between the regional-scale background and the
key end-member sources in the cities, which could be associated with
the local and regional emission sources. Here we use a linearized binary
physical mixing diagram to estimate<?pagebreak page6727?> the mean isotopic signature of the
urbanized source end-members by extrapolating the 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TGM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mean</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to zero
(where TGM is mostly derived from urbanized sources) (Fig. 3), which
showed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values of approximately
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15 ‰ and 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 ‰ (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3913"><bold>(a)</bold> Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg versus 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TGM and <bold>(b)</bold> mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg versus 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TGM diagrams suggesting a physical binary mixing
between the regional-scale background and urbanized source end-member. Lines
represent the linear regression of the data and shaded gray areas are the
95 % confidence area of the regression.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/6721/2021/acp-21-6721-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3963">The estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg) for urbanized
emissions was much lower (or much higher) than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) for GEM emitted from CFPPs in China (Tang et
al., 2017; H. W. Liu et al., 2019). The isotopic signatures of other
anthropogenic emission sectors in China have not been appropriately
constrained. R. Y. Sun et al. (2016) estimated a
mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for the global anthropogenic GEM
emissions in 2010. Our estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg for the urbanized sources were, however,
0.57 ‰ lower and 0.07 ‰ higher than
their predicted value for anthropogenic emissions, respectively. A recent
study by Jiskra et al. (2019a) showed highly negative
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values (means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00 ‰ to
0.17 ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for GEM in air impacted by Hg emissions
from building surfaces and indoor sources, and these values seemed to
support, to some extent, the estimated negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and
close to zero <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg signatures of urbanized sources in the
present study.</p>
      <?pagebreak page6728?><p id="d1e4200">Soil emissions are a potentially  important source of atmospheric TGM in
urban areas (Feng et al., 2005; Agnan et al., 2016), and GEM emission
fluxes from urban soils were reported to be approximately one order of
magnitude higher than that from pavement and building surfaces (Gabriel et
al., 2006; Eckley and Branfireun, 2008). The sampling sites in the present
study were largely surrounded by cropland and sparsely vegetated soils
(Fig. S2 in the Supplement), and it is therefore important to investigate their effects on
the variations in TGM concentrations and isotopic compositions. The measured
mean GEM emission fluxes from soils in Guiyang and Wuhan in summer were 35.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32.6 (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 9.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.3 (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values of GEM emitted from soils were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15 ‰ (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively, in Guiyang, and were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.86 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.52 ‰ (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively, in Wuhan (Fig. S4 in the Supplement). These values
suggest that the isotopic compositions of soil GEM emissions in urban areas
of China likely have highly negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values, similar to
that of GEM emitted from building surfaces and indoor Hg-containing products
(Jiskra et al., 2019a). We thus hypothesize that soil,
building surfaces and indoor Hg-containing product emissions contributed to
the highly negative TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values observed in this study.
Based on the estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values of urbanized source
end-member (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), anthropogenic emissions
(mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), and GEM emitted from soils, building
surfaces and indoor Hg-containing products (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) in this and previous studies (R. Y. Sun et al.,
2016; Jiskra et al., 2019a), we estimate that the contribution of soil,
building surfaces and indoor Hg-containing product emissions to the TGM in
the 10 cities was approximately equal to that of primary anthropogenic
emissions (48 % versus 52 %). We caution that, due to the fact that the
isotopic signatures of GEM emitted from many anthropogenic sources and land
surfaces in China have not been well constrained, such a preliminary
assessment should have large uncertainties. However, our estimate is overall
consistent with previous studies on GEM emission fluxes from land surfaces
and anthropogenic sources in Chinese urban areas. For example, previous
studies on GEM emission fluxes from urban surfaces in China showed a mean
value of 83.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 170 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Fang et al., 2004; Feng et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2006; Fu et al.,
2012), which was relatively higher than the mean anthropogenic GEM flux
(48.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 48.1 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the 10
investigated cities (Table S5 in the Supplement) (AMAP/UNEP, 2013). The findings in this
and previous studies therefore suggest that soil, building surfaces and
indoor Hg-containing product emissions would play an important role in
regulating the TGM concentrations and isotopic compositions in urban areas
of China, which is further discussed in the following section.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Effect of surface emissions on seasonal variations in TGM concentrations
and isotopic compositions</title>
      <p id="d1e4605">Strong seasonal variations in the mean TGM concentrations and isotopic
compositions were observed for most cities (Fig. 4). The mean TGM
concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values were relatively higher in
summer than winter in most cities except for the two (Guiyang and Guangzhou)
in the low latitudes that showed an opposite trend. On the contrary, the
mean TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg showed lower values in summer than winter in
all the cities except southernmost Guangzhou, which showed no seasonal
difference. The seasonal variations in TGM concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg in the present study were consistent with previous findings
generated from year-round continuous observations in China, e.g., higher
summertime TGM in Beijing and Shanghai (Zhang et al., 2013; Duan et al.,
2017), higher wintertime TGM in Guiyang and Guangzhou (Feng et al., 2004;
Chen et al., 2013), and lower summer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg in Guiyang and
Xi'an (Yu et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2017).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4654">Summertime and wintertime means of TGM concentrations <bold>(a)</bold>, TGM
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg <bold>(b)</bold> and TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg <bold>(c)</bold> in the 10 Chinese
cities. Error bars represent 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/6721/2021/acp-21-6721-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page6729?><p id="d1e4702">The summertime higher TGM concentrations observed in most cities in the
present study was in contrast to the observations in most rural areas in
China as well as in other regions in the Northern Hemisphere, which
frequently showed lower TGM or GEM concentrations in summer than in winter
(Fu et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016; Jiskra et al., 2018). Studies on the
seasonal variations in TGM or GEM isotopic compositions in rural areas are
currently limited. A recent study at rural Mt. Changbai in northeastern China
showed higher TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values in summer than winter
(Fu et al., 2019), which is opposite to the seasonal variations
in TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg at most urban sites in the present study. Such a
summertime lower TGM or GEM level and higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg pattern in rural
areas should be mainly attributed to increasing atmospheric oxidation and
vegetation uptake of GEM as well as decreasing residential coal combustion
(Sprovieri et al., 2016; Horowitz et al., 2017; Jiskra et al., 2018; Fu
et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2019). The seasonality in atmospheric oxidation
chemistry, vegetation activity and residential coal combustion should be
similar between urban and rural areas in China, as reflected by the
seasonality in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (representing atmospheric oxidation chemistry), NDVI
(representing vegetation activity) and CO (predominantly (40 %) originating
from residential coal combustion) (Jiskra et al., 2018; Zheng et al.,
2018), which showed summertime higher O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and NDVI and
lower CO concentrations at most urban sites (Fig. S5 in the Supplement). Therefore, the
contrasting seasonal variations in TGM concentrations and isotopic
compositions at most urban sites with respect to rural sites provided
evidence that summertime enhanced emissions in these cities probably
outbalanced the effect of seasonal variations in atmospheric oxidation
chemistry, vegetation activity and residential coal combustion.</p>
      <p id="d1e4757">Traditionally, local and regional anthropogenic emissions were thought to
dominate the TGM or GEM pollution in urban areas of China (Lin et al.,
2010). A recent study showed quantitatively comparable coal combustion Hg
emissions in China between winter and summer (Gao et al.,
2019). Seasonal-resolution Hg emission inventories for other anthropogenic
sources (e.g., production of cement, iron, steel, aluminum and
non-ferrous metals) in China have not been established. Based on the monthly
production data of these source materials, we estimated that there is no
strong seasonality in total Hg emissions from these sources (Table S6 in the Supplement).
Prevailing wind directions during the wintertime and summertime sampling
campaigns were similar in Jinan, Lanzhou, Zhengzhou and Shanghai but were
different in the remaining cities (Fig. S6 in the Supplement). Variations in the predominant
wind direction would change the relationships between receptor and regional
anthropogenic emissions, which could further influence the TGM levels and
isotopic compositions in these cities. Given the similarity in wintertime
and summertime prevailing wind directions in some cities and consistent
summertime lower CO concentrations in most cities, it is postulated that the
variations in local anthropogenic emissions and transport of regional
anthropogenic emissions were not likely the main cause for the seasonal
variations in TGM concentrations and isotopic compositions.</p>
      <p id="d1e4760">We found that the amplitudes of seasonal variations in TGM concentrations
((TGM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">summer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–TGM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">winter</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TGM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">summer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg
values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">summer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">winter</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
were both significantly positively correlated with latitude of the cities
(ANOVA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 0.85 and 0.66 for TGM and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg,
respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both; Fig. 5a and c), whereas the
seasonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg amplitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">summer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">winter</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) were significantly negatively correlated
with latitude (ANOVA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 5b). This
indicates the seasonality in TGM concentrations and isotopic compositions
were likely related to weather- and climate-dependent (e.g., solar radiation
and air temperature) sources and/or atmospheric processes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4965">Latitude dependence of the seasonal variations in TGM
concentrations and isotopic compositions in the 10 Chinese cities. <bold>(a)</bold>
Seasonal amplitude of TGM concentrations ((TGM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">summer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–TGM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">winter</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TGM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">summer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus latitude. <bold>(b)</bold> Seasonal amplitude of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">summer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">winter</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus latitude. <bold>(c)</bold> Seasonal amplitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">summer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">winter</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus latitude. Lines represent the linear
regression of the data and shaded gray areas are the 95 % confidence area
of the regression.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/6721/2021/acp-21-6721-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5121">GEM emission fluxes from soil, building surfaces and pavement in urban areas
are highly related to solar radiation and temperature and frequently peak in
summer in the Northern Hemisphere (Gabriel et al., 2006; Eckley and
Branfireun, 2008). Studies on the seasonal variations in GEM emissions from
building surfaces and pavement are not available in Chinese urban areas but
are expected to be similar to that of soil GEM emission (Gabriel et al.,
2006). Therefore, using<?pagebreak page6730?> simulated seasonal soil GEM emission data is
generally adequate to interpret the effect of surface GEM emission on the
seasonal variations in TGM concentrations and isotopic compositions. As
shown in Fig. 6a, a significant positive correlation was observed between
the seasonal amplitudes of TGM concentration and simulated soil GEM emission
flux ((flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">July</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">January</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">July</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating enhanced
surface GEM emission is responsible for the summertime increase of TGM
concentrations at most urban sites. Negative seasonal TGM magnitudes were
observed in Guiyang and Guangzhou in the low latitudes where there is a
small summertime increase of soil GEM emission fluxes (Fig. 6a). We
postulate that the effect of surface emission on the seasonal variations in
TGM concentrations in Guiyang and Guangzhou was likely outbalanced by other
factors, e.g., seasonal variations in atmospheric oxidization chemistry,
vegetation activity and residential coal combustion.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5160">Effect of soil Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (GEM) emissions on variations in TGM
concentrations and isotopic compositions at the sampling sites in this
study. Linear regressions between <bold>(a)</bold> seasonal TGM amplitude and seasonal
amplitude of simulated soil Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions flux, <bold>(b)</bold> mean TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and simulated soil Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions flux, and <bold>(c)</bold> mean TGM
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and simulated soil Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions flux. Lines
represent the linear regression of the data and shaded gray areas are the
95 % confidence area of the regression. Simulated soil Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
fluxes are from Wang et al. (2016).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/6721/2021/acp-21-6721-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5247">Site-specific mean TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values
were calculated for summer and winter sampling campaigns separately and
then values at all the sampling sites were correlated with their respective
simulated soil GEM emission fluxes. A significant negative correlation was
obtained between TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and simulated soil emission (ANOVA,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 6b). As mentioned above, the
isotopic compositions of GEM emitted from urban surfaces were characterized
by highly negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg values (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰). Thus, high surface GEM emissions should shift
TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg towards negative values. A weak positive correlation
was observed between mean TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and simulated soil GEM
emission fluxes (ANOVA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 6b),
suggesting that high surface GEM emissions led to a slightly positive shift
of TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg. Seasonal amplitudes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg) in the 10 cities were significantly negatively (or
positively) correlated with seasonal amplitudes of simulated soil GEM
emission flux (ANOVA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.54 or 0.63, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both;
Fig. S7 in the Supplement), suggesting the dominant role of surface GEM emissions on the
seasonal variations in TGM isotopic compositions.</p>
      <p id="d1e5445">It should be noted that indoor TGM also have highly negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg (0.17 ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values
(Jiskra et al., 2019a), but this source is not likely a
dominant one contributing to the seasonal variations in TGM isotopic
compositions. Indoor TGM concentrations in urban areas can be highly
elevated mainly due to evaporation of GEM from Hg-containing products (e.g.,
spills of liquid mercury in thermometers, fluorescent light and Hg switches)
in the absence of sunlight (Carpi and Chen, 2001; Baughman, 2006). This
source is expected to yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg slopes
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in TGM isotopic compositions due to the nuclear volume
effect (NVE) (Zheng and Hintelmann, 2010; Ghosh et al., 2013). As shown
in Fig. S8 in the Supplement, a York bivariate linear regression between TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">199</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg in the studied cites showed a slope of
1.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is consistent with that of soil GEM
emissions (1.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. S7 in the Supplement) and that of
photoreduction of Hg(II) to GEM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Blum et al.,
2014) but much lower than that predicted for indoor GEM sources, suggesting
that seasonal variations in TGM isotopic compositions were unlikely
dominated by indoor emission sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e5605">Hence, we can conclude that the seasonal variations in TGM concentrations
and isotopic compositions in the 10 cities were likely controlled by
surface emission sources. However, it is currently difficult to determine
which of the surface emission sources (e.g., soil, pavement or building
surfaces) was more important. As discussed earlier, GEM emitted from these
sources were characterized by similar isotopic signatures and are difficult
to distinguish. GEM<?pagebreak page6731?> emissions flux data from pavement and building
surfaces in Chinese urban areas are very limited. A previous study in
Toronto, Canada, and Austin, USA, reported that GEM emission fluxes from soils
were on average 8 times higher than those from pavement and building surfaces
(Eckley and Branfireun, 2008). This, together with the large
fraction of cropland and sparsely vegetated soil area in the total urban
land area (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57 %; Table S1 in the Supplement), indicates soil emissions were likely
more important than building surface and pavement emissions at a regional
scale (e.g., the size of 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> surrounding
the sampling sites). However, given that building surfaces and pavement
emissions sources were in close proximity to the sampling sites (Fig. S2 in the Supplement),
their contributions to atmospheric TGM budget may exceed those of soil
emission sources locally. Therefore, further studies and approaches are
needed to better constrain the contributions of local and regional land
surface emissions to TGM variations at specific sites.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions and implications</title>
      <p id="d1e5649">TGM concentrations in Chinese urban areas were generally highly elevated,
which was traditionally thought to be mainly attributed to primary
anthropogenic emissions (Lin et al., 2010; Fu et al., 2015). Due to the
implementation of aggressive air pollution control measures in China since
2014, primary anthropogenic Hg emissions within or surrounding many Chinese
cities are expected to have been reduced noticeably in recent years (K. Y. Liu
et al., 2019). Land surface Hg emissions are also an important source of
atmospheric Hg (Selin et al., 2007; Holmes et al., 2010; Pirrone et al.,
2010; Agnan et al., 2016). Therefore, questions have emerged as to whether
land surface emissions become important in the variations in TGM
concentrations and isotopic compositions in Chinese urban areas. The present
study suggests that surface GEM emissions likely dominated the seasonal
variations in TGM concentrations and isotopic compositions in most cities.
GEM emissions from land surface are generally higher in summer and
characterized by significantly negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg signatures, and
therefore are able to cause increasing TGM concentrations and a negative
shift of TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Hg in summer in Chinese cities. Therefore, we
suggest that land surface emissions should be incorporated in future studies
to interpret the cycling (or fractionation) of TGM (or TGM isotopes) in
urban areas and/or other regions with strong land surface GEM emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e5674">China has been regarded as the world's strongest source region of
anthropogenic Hg emissions. Since the Chinese economic reform in 1978, more
than 13 000 Mg of Hg have been released into the atmosphere from
anthropogenic sources (Wu et al., 2016). Large
fractions (35 % to 49 %) of these emitted Hg were in the form of short-lived
particulate bound and oxidized Hg and would have deposited quickly to areas
close to sources such as urbanized and industrial areas, which should have
increased Hg content in land surface substrates. The combined effects of
global warming and increased substrate Hg content would induce increasing
surface emissions, blunting the benefits of anthropogenic Hg emission
control in China. Therefore, future studies should be conducted in
systematically assessing the negative effects of increasing soil Hg
emissions in a changing environment (anthropogenic emissions and climate and
land use change) during the implementation of the Minamata Convention.
Possible strategies should also be considered to mitigate surface Hg
emissions and, together with effective controls of anthropogenic
emissions, to eventually reduce the threats of Hg to human health and the
environment.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5682">All the datasets used in this study can be found in the Supplement.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e5685">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6721-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6721-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5694">XuF, GZ, JL, HG and XiF initiated the project and designated
the field experiments. XuF, CL, HZ, YX, HZ and XL carried out
the field sampling. CL and HZ performed the laboratory analysis. XuF
prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5700">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5706">This work was funded by the National Key R&amp;D Program of China
(2017YFC0212001), the Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDBS-LY-DQC029 and
2017443), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (41622305) and
the K. C. Wong Education Foundation. We also thank Guangcai Zhong, Shuhao Dong, Baoxin Li, Shizhen Zhao, Bolun Zhang, Jiao Tang, Hongxing Jiang,
Buqing Xu, Yu Wang, Dawen Yao, Fengwen Huang, Kun Nie, Lingxi Zhan, Jiaying Wang, Liuyuan Zhao and Zhanxiang Wang who have contributed to the sampling
of TGM. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful suggestions.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e5711">This research has been supported by the National Key R and D Program of China (grant no. 2017YFC0212001), the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. ZDBS-LY-DQC029 and 2017443), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (grant no. 41622305) and the K. C. Wong Education Foundation.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5717">This paper was edited by Ashu Dastoor and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Agnan, Y., Le Dantec, T., Moore, C. W., Edwards, G. C., and Obrist, D.:
New Constraints on Terrestrial Surface Atmosphere Fluxes of Gaseous
Elemental Mercury Using a Global Database, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 50, 507–524, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b04013</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>AMAP/UNEP: Geospatially distributed mercury emissions dataset 2010v1, available at: <uri>https://www.amap.no/mercury-emissions/datasets</uri> (last access: 25 April 2021),
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baughman, T. A.: Elemental mercury spills, Environ. Health Persp., 114,
147–152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1289/ehp.7048</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Biswas, A., Blum, J. D., Bergquist, B. A., Keeler, G. J., and Xie, Z. Q.:
Natural mercury isotope variation in coal deposits and organic soils,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 8303–8309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es801444b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es801444b</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Blum, J. D. and Bergquist, B. A.: Reporting of variations in the natural
isotopic composition of mercury, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 388, 353–359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1236-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00216-007-1236-9</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Blum, J. D. and Johnson, M. W.: Recent Developments in Mercury Stable
Isotope Analysis, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 82, 733–757,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Blum, J. D., Sherman, L. S., and Johnson, M. W.: Mercury isotopes in earth
and environmental sciences, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 42, 249–269,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124107</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carpi, A. and Chen, Y.-f.: Gaseous Elemental Mercury as an Indoor Air
Pollutant, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4170–4173,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es010749p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es010749p</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carpi, A. and Chen, Y.-f.: Gaseous elemental mercury fluxes in New York
City, Water Air Soil Poll., 140, 371–379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020198025725" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1020198025725</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, L. G., Liu, M., Xu, Z. C., Fan, R. F., Tao, J., Chen, D. H., Zhang, D.
Q., Xie, D. H., and Sun, J. R.: Variation trends and influencing factors of
total gaseous mercury in the Pearl River Delta – A highly industrialised
region in South China influenced by seasonal monsoons, Atmos. Environ., 77,
757–766, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.053</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Demers, J. D., Blum, J. D., and Zak, D. R.: Mercury isotopes in a forested
ecosystem: Implications for air-surface exchange dynamics and the global
mercury cycle, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 222–238, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/Gbc.20021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/Gbc.20021</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Demers, J. D., Sherman, L. S., Blum, J. D., Marsik, F. J., and Dvonch, J.
T.: Coupling atmospheric mercury isotope ratios and meteorology to identify
sources of mercury impacting a coastal urban-industrial region near
Pensacola, Florida, USA, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 1689–1705, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duan, L., Wang, X. H., Wang, D. F., Duan, Y. S., Cheng, N., and Xiu, G. L.:
Atmospheric mercury speciation in Shanghai, China, Sci. Total Environ., 578,
460–468, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eckley, C. S. and Branfireun, B.: Gaseous mercury emissions from urban
surfaces: Controls and spatiotemporal trends, Appl. Geochem., 23, 369–383,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.12.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.12.008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Enrico, M., Le Roux, G., Marusczak, N., Heimburger, L. E., Claustres, A.,
Fu, X. W., Sun, R. Y., and Sonke, J. E.: Atmospheric Mercury Transfer to
Peat Bogs Dominated by Gaseous Elemental Mercury Dry Deposition,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 2405–2412,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b06058</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fang, F. M., Wang, Q. C., and Li, J. F.: Urban environmental mercury in
Changchun, a metropolitan city in Northeastern China: source, cycle, and
fate, Sci. Total Environ., 330, 159–170, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.006</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Feng, X. B., Shang, L. H., Wang, S. F., Tang, S. L., and Zheng, W.: Temporal
variation of total gaseous mercury in the air of Guiyang, China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 109, D03303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd004159</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Feng, X. B., Wang, S. F., Qiu, G. A., Hou, Y. M., and Tang, S. L.: Total
gaseous mercury emissions from soil in Guiyang, Guizhou, China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 110, D14306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005643" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd005643</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, X., Yang, X., Tan, Q., Ming, L., Lin, T., Lin, C.-J., Li, X., and Feng,
X.: Isotopic Composition of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in the Marine Boundary
Layer of East China Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123,
7656–7669, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028671" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD028671</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, X., Zhang, H., Liu, C., Zhang, H., Lin, C.-J., and Feng, X.: Significant
Seasonal Variations in Isotopic Composition of Atmospheric Total Gaseous
Mercury at Forest Sites in China Caused by Vegetation and Mercury Sources,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 13748–13756,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b05016</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., and Feng, X. B.: Variations of atmospheric total gaseous mercury concentrations for the sampling campaigns of 2001/2002 and 2009/2010 and implications of changes in regional emissions of atmospheric mercury, Bull. Miner. Petr. Geochem., 34, 242–249, 2015 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Feng, X. B., Qiu, G. L., Shang, L. H., and Zhang, H.: Speciated
atmospheric mercury and its potential source in Guiyang, China, Atmos.
Environ., 45, 4205–4212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.012</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Feng, X. B., Zhang, H., Yu, B., and Chen, L. G.: Mercury
emissions from natural surfaces highly impacted by human activities in
Guangzhou province, South China, Atmos. Environ., 54, 185–193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.008</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Heimburger, L. E., and Sonke, J. E.: Collection of atmospheric
gaseous mercury for stable isotope analysis using iodine- and
chlorine-impregnated activated carbon traps, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 29,
841–852, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3ja50356a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3ja50356a</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Zhang, H., Yu, B., Wang, X., Lin, C.-J., and Feng, X. B.: Observations of atmospheric mercury in China: a critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9455–9476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Marusczak, N., Wang, X., Gheusi, F., and Sonke, J. E.: Isotopic
Composition of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in the Free Troposphere of the Pic
du Midi Observatory, France, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
5641–5650, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b00033</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gabriel, M. C., Williamson, D. G., Zhang, H., Brooks, S., and Lindberg, S.:
Diurnal and seasonal trends in total gaseous mercury flux from three urban
ground surfaces, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4269–4284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.004</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gao, W. D., Jiang, W., and Zhou, M. M.: The spatial and temporal
characteristics of mercury emission from coal combustion in China during the
year 2015, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 10, 776–783, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.12.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2018.12.005</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page6733?><ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ghosh, S., Schauble, E. A., Couloume, G. L., Blum, J. D., and Bergquist, B.
A.: Estimation of nuclear volume dependent fractionation of mercury isotopes
in equilibrium liquid-vapor evaporation experiments, Chem. Geol., 336, 5–12,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gratz, L. E., Keeler, G. J., Blum, J. D., and Sherman, L. S.: Isotopic
composition and fractionation of mercury in Great Lakes precipitation and
ambient air, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 7764–7770, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es100383w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es100383w</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gustin, M. S., Amos, H. M., Huang, J., Miller, M. B., and Heidecorn, K.: Measuring and modeling mercury in the atmosphere: a critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5697–5713, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5697-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5697-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gustin, M. S., Dunham-Cheatham, S. M., and Zhang, L.: Comparison of 4
Methods for Measurement of Reactive, Gaseous Oxidized, and Particulate Bound
Mercury, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 14489–14495,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04648" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b04648</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Corbitt, E. S., Mao, J., Yang, X., Talbot, R., and Slemr, F.: Global atmospheric model for mercury including oxidation by bromine atoms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 12037–12057, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-12037-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-12037-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Horowitz, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Y., Dibble, T. S., Slemr, F., Amos, H. M., Schmidt, J. A., Corbitt, E. S., Marais, E. A., and Sunderland, E. M.: A new mechanism for atmospheric mercury redox chemistry: implications for the global mercury budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6353–6371, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6353-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-6353-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, J. Y., Miller, M. B., Weiss-Penzias, P., and Gustin, M. S.:
Comparison of gaseous oxidized Hg measured by KCl-coated denuders, and Nylon
and Cation exchange Membranes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
7307–7316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es4012349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es4012349</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiskra, M., Sonke, J. E., Obrist, D., Bieser, J., Ebinghaus, R., Myhre, C.
L., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Wangberg, I., Kyllonen, K., Worthy, D., Martin, L.
G., Labuschagne, C., Mkololo, T., Ramonet, M., Magand, O., and Dommergue,
A.: A vegetation control on seasonal variations in global atmospheric
mercury concentrations, Nat. Geosci., 11, 244–250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0078-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-018-0078-8</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiskra, M., Marusczak, N., Leung, K. H., Hawkins, L., Prestbo, E., and
Sonke, J. E.: Automated Stable Isotope Sampling of Gaseous Elemental Mercury
(ISO-GEM): Insights into GEM Emissions from Building Surfaces, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 53, 4346–4354, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06381" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b06381</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiskra, M., Sonke, J. E., Agnan, Y., Helmig, D., and Obrist, D.: Insights from mercury stable isotopes on terrestrial–atmosphere exchange of Hg(0) in the Arctic tundra, Biogeosciences, 16, 4051–4064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4051-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-16-4051-2019</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, C.-J., Pan, L., Streets, D. G., Shetty, S. K., Jang, C., Feng, X., Chu, H.-W., and Ho, T. C.: Estimating mercury emission outflow from East Asia using CMAQ-Hg, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1853–1864, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1853-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1853-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, H. W., Diao, X., Yu, B., Shi, J. B., Liu, Q., Yin, Y. G., Hu, L. G.,
Yuan, C. G., and Jiang, G. B.: Effect of air pollution control devices on
mercury isotopic fractionation in coal-fired power plants, Chem. Geol., 517,
1–6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.04.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.04.019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, K. Y., Wu, Q. R., Wang, L., Wang, S. X., Liu, T. H., Ding, D., Tang,
Y., Li, G. L., Tian, H. Z., Duan, L., Wang, X., Fu, X. W., Feng, X. B., and
Hao, J. M.: Measure-Specific Effectiveness of Air Pollution Control on
China's Atmospheric Mercury Concentration and Deposition during 2013–2017,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 8938–8946,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02428" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b02428</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lyman, S. N. and Jaffe, D. A.: Formation and fate of oxidized mercury in
the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Nat. Geosci., 5, 114–117,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NGEO1353</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lynam, M. M. and Keeler, G. J.: Automated speciated mercury measurements in
Michigan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 9253–9262, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es040458r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es040458r</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mao, H., Cheng, I., and Zhang, L.: Current understanding of the driving mechanisms for spatiotemporal variations of atmospheric speciated mercury: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12897–12924, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12897-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12897-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Obrist, D., Agnan, Y., Jiskra, M., Olson, C. L., Colegrove, D. P., Hueber,
J., Moore, C. W., Sonke, J. E., and Helmig, D.: Tundra uptake of atmospheric
elemental mercury drives Arctic mercury pollution, Nature, 547, 201–204,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22997" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature22997</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Obrist, D., Kirk, J. L., Zhang, L., Sunderland, E. M., Jiskra, M., and
Selin, N. E.: A review of global environmental mercury processes in response
to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land
use, Ambio, 47, 116–140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-1004-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13280-017-1004-9</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peterson, C., Gustin, M., and Lyman, S.: Atmospheric mercury concentrations
and speciation measured from 2004 to 2007 in Reno, Nevada, USA, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 4646–4654, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.053</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pirrone, N., Cinnirella, S., Feng, X., Finkelman, R. B., Friedli, H. R., Leaner, J., Mason, R., Mukherjee, A. B., Stracher, G. B., Streets, D. G., and Telmer, K.: Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5951–5964, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rutter, A. P., Snyder, D. C., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Gonzalez-Abraham, R., Molina, L. T., Márquez, C., Cárdenas, B., and de Foy, B.: In situ measurements of speciated atmospheric mercury and the identification of source regions in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 207–220, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-207-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-207-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Yantosca, R. M., Strode, S.,
Jaegle, L., and Jaffe, D.: Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric
mercury: Global constraints from observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D02308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007450" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007450</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shah, V., Jaeglé, L., Gratz, L. E., Ambrose, J. L., Jaffe, D. A., Selin, N. E., Song, S., Campos, T. L., Flocke, F. M., Reeves, M., Stechman, D., Stell, M., Festa, J., Stutz, J., Weinheimer, A. J., Knapp, D. J., Montzka, D. D., Tyndall, G. S., Apel, E. C., Hornbrook, R. S., Hills, A. J., Riemer, D. D., Blake, N. J., Cantrell, C. A., and Mauldin III, R. L.: Origin of oxidized mercury in the summertime free troposphere over the southeastern US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1511–1530, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sherman, L. S., Blum, J. D., Johnson, K. P., Keeler, G. J., Barres, J. A.,
and Douglas, T. A.: Mass-independent fractionation o<?pagebreak page6734?>f mercury isotopes in
Arctic snow driven by sunlight, Nat. Geosci., 3, 173–177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/Ngeo758" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/Ngeo758</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sonke, J. E.: A global model of mass independent mercury stable isotope
fractionation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 4577–4590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.027</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sprovieri, F., Pirrone, N., Bencardino, M., D'Amore, F., Carbone, F., Cinnirella, S., Mannarino, V., Landis, M., Ebinghaus, R., Weigelt, A., Brunke, E.-G., Labuschagne, C., Martin, L., Munthe, J., Wängberg, I., Artaxo, P., Morais, F., Barbosa, H. D. M. J., Brito, J., Cairns, W., Barbante, C., Diéguez, M. D. C., Garcia, P. E., Dommergue, A., Angot, H., Magand, O., Skov, H., Horvat, M., Kotnik, J., Read, K. A., Neves, L. M., Gawlik, B. M., Sena, F., Mashyanov, N., Obolkin, V., Wip, D., Feng, X. B., Zhang, H., Fu, X., Ramachandran, R., Cossa, D., Knoery, J., Marusczak, N., Nerentorp, M., and Norstrom, C.: Atmospheric mercury concentrations observed at ground-based monitoring sites globally distributed in the framework of the GMOS network, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11915–11935, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11915-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-11915-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, G., Sommar, J., Feng, X., Lin, C.-J., Ge, M., Wang, W., Yin, R., Fu,
X., and Shang, L.: Mass-dependent and -independent fractionation of mercury
isotope during gas-phase oxidation of elemental mercury vapor by atomic Cl
and Br, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 9232–9241,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01668" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b01668</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, R. Y., Enrico, M., Heimburger, L. E., Scott, C., and Sonke, J. E.: A
double-stage tube furnace-acid-trapping protocol for the pre-concentration
of mercury from solid samples for isotopic analysis, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 405,
6771–6781, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7152-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00216-013-7152-2</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, R. Y., Streets, D. G., Horowitz, H. M., Amos, H. M., Liu, G. J.,
Perrot, V., Toutain, J. P., Hintelmann, H., Sunderland, E. M., and Sonke, J.
E.: Historical (1850–2010) mercury stable isotope inventory from
anthropogenic sources to the atmosphere, Elem. Sci. Anth., 4, 1–15,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.12952/journal.elementa.000091</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, R. Y., Jiskra, M., Amos, H. M., Zhang, Y. X., Sunderland, E. M., and
Sonke, J. E.: Modelling the mercury stable isotope distribution of Earth
surface reservoirs: Implications for global Hg cycling, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 246, 156–173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.11.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2018.11.036</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Swartzendruber, P. C., Jaffe, D. A., and Finley, B.: Development and First
Results of an Aircraft-Based, High Time Resolution Technique for Gaseous
Elemental and Reactive (Oxidized) Gaseous Mercury, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 43, 7484–7489, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es901390t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es901390t</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tang, S., Feng, C., Feng, X., Zhu, J., Sun, R., Fan, H., Wang, L., Li, R.,
Mao, T., and Zhou, T.: Stable isotope composition of mercury forms in flue
gases from a typical coal-fired power plant, Inner Mongolia, northern China,
J. Hazard. Mater., 328, 90–97,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.014</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tang, Y., Wang, S., Wu, Q., Liu, K., Wang, L., Li, S., Gao, W., Zhang, L., Zheng, H., Li, Z., and Hao, J.: Recent decrease trend of atmospheric mercury concentrations in East China: the influence of anthropogenic emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8279–8291, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8279-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-8279-2018</ext-link>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): Method 1631, Revision E: Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and
Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry, United States
Environmental Protection Agency, 10–46 pp., 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, D. Y., He, L., Shi, X. J., Wei, S. Q., and Feng, X. B.: Release flux
of mercury from different environmental surfaces in Chongqing, China,
Chemosphere, 64, 1845–1854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.01.054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.01.054</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Lin, C.-J., Yuan, W., Sommar, J., Zhu, W., and Feng, X.: Emission-dominated gas exchange of elemental mercury vapor over natural surfaces in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11125–11143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11125-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-11125-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, Q. R., Wang, S. X., Li, G. L., Liang, S., Lin, C. J., Wang, Y. F., Cai,
S. Y., Liu, K. Y., and Hao, J. M.: Temporal Trend and Spatial Distribution
of Speciated Atmospheric Mercury Emissions in China During 1978–2014,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 13428–13435, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xu, H., Sonke, J. E., Guinot, B., Fu, X., Sun, R., Lanzanova, A., Candaudap,
F., Shen, Z., and Cao, J.: Seasonal and Annual Variations in Atmospheric Hg
and Pb Isotopes in Xi'an, China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 3759–3766,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b06145</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, B., Fu, X., Yin, R., Zhang, H., Wang, X., Lin, C.-J., Wu, C., Zhang, Y.,
He, N., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Shang, L., Sommar, J., Sonke, J. E., Maurice, L.,
Guinot, B., and Feng, X.: Isotopic Composition of Atmospheric Mercury in
China: New Evidence for Sources and Transformation Processes in Air and in
Vegetation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 9262–9269,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b01782</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Wang, Z. W., Wang, C. J., and Zhang, X. S.: Concentrations and
gas-particle partitioning of atmospheric reactive mercury at an urban site
in Beijing, China, Environ. Pollut., 249, 13–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.064</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Wang, S. X., Wang, L., and Hao, J. M.: Atmospheric mercury concentration and chemical speciation at a rural site in Beijing, China: implications of mercury emission sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10505–10516, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10505-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10505-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zheng, B., Tong, D., Li, M., Liu, F., Hong, C., Geng, G., Li, H., Li, X., Peng, L., Qi, J., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Zheng, Y., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14095–14111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zheng, W. and Hintelmann, H.: Nuclear Field Shift Effect in Isotope
Fractionation of Mercury during Abiotic Reduction in the Absence of Light, J.
Phys. Chem. A., 114, 4238–4245, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, J., Wang, T., Talbot, R., Mao, H., Hall, C. B., Yang, X., Fu, C., Zhuang, B., Li, S., Han, Y., and Huang, X.: Characteristics of atmospheric Total Gaseous Mercury (TGM) observed in urban Nanjing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 12103–12118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12103-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-12103-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Isotopic compositions of atmospheric total gaseous mercury in 10 Chinese cities and implications for land surface emissions</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Land surface emissions are an important source of atmospheric total gaseous
mercury (TGM); however, its role on the variations of TGM isotopic
compositions and concentrations has not been properly evaluated. In this
study, TGM isotope compositions, a powerful tracer for sources and
transformation of Hg, were measured at 10 urban sites and one rural site in
China. TGM concentrations were higher in summer than in winter in most
cities except in Guiyang and Guangzhou in the low latitudes. The summertime
high TGM concentrations  coincided with prevailing low TGM <i>δ</i><sup>202</sup>Hg and high TGM Δ<sup>199</sup>Hg signatures. These seasonal
patterns were in contrast with those typically observed in rural areas in
the Northern Hemisphere, suggesting that atmospheric oxidation chemistry,
vegetation activity and residential coal combustion were likely not
the dominant mechanisms contributing to the TGM concentration and isotopic
composition seasonality in Chinese cities. The amplitudes of seasonal
variations in TGM concentrations and Δ<sup>199</sup>Hg (or TGM <i>δ</i><sup>202</sup>Hg) were significantly positively (or negatively) correlated with
that of the simulated soil GEM emission flux. These results suggest that the
seasonal variations in TGM isotopic compositions and concentrations in the
10 Chinese cities were likely controlled by land surface emissions that
were observed or reported with highly negative <i>δ</i><sup>202</sup>Hg
signatures.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Agnan, Y., Le Dantec, T., Moore, C. W., Edwards, G. C., and Obrist, D.:
New Constraints on Terrestrial Surface Atmosphere Fluxes of Gaseous
Elemental Mercury Using a Global Database, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 50, 507–524, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04013</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>AMAP/UNEP: Geospatially distributed mercury emissions dataset 2010v1, available at: <a href="https://www.amap.no/mercury-emissions/datasets" target="_blank"/> (last access: 25 April 2021),
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Baughman, T. A.: Elemental mercury spills, Environ. Health Persp., 114,
147–152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7048</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Biswas, A., Blum, J. D., Bergquist, B. A., Keeler, G. J., and Xie, Z. Q.:
Natural mercury isotope variation in coal deposits and organic soils,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 8303–8309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es801444b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/Es801444b</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Blum, J. D. and Bergquist, B. A.: Reporting of variations in the natural
isotopic composition of mercury, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 388, 353–359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1236-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1236-9</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Blum, J. D. and Johnson, M. W.: Recent Developments in Mercury Stable
Isotope Analysis, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 82, 733–757,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Blum, J. D., Sherman, L. S., and Johnson, M. W.: Mercury isotopes in earth
and environmental sciences, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 42, 249–269,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124107</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Carpi, A. and Chen, Y.-f.: Gaseous Elemental Mercury as an Indoor Air
Pollutant, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4170–4173,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es010749p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es010749p</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Carpi, A. and Chen, Y.-f.: Gaseous elemental mercury fluxes in New York
City, Water Air Soil Poll., 140, 371–379, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020198025725" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020198025725</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Chen, L. G., Liu, M., Xu, Z. C., Fan, R. F., Tao, J., Chen, D. H., Zhang, D.
Q., Xie, D. H., and Sun, J. R.: Variation trends and influencing factors of
total gaseous mercury in the Pearl River Delta – A highly industrialised
region in South China influenced by seasonal monsoons, Atmos. Environ., 77,
757–766, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.053</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Demers, J. D., Blum, J. D., and Zak, D. R.: Mercury isotopes in a forested
ecosystem: Implications for air-surface exchange dynamics and the global
mercury cycle, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 222–238, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/Gbc.20021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/Gbc.20021</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Demers, J. D., Sherman, L. S., Blum, J. D., Marsik, F. J., and Dvonch, J.
T.: Coupling atmospheric mercury isotope ratios and meteorology to identify
sources of mercury impacting a coastal urban-industrial region near
Pensacola, Florida, USA, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 1689–1705, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Duan, L., Wang, X. H., Wang, D. F., Duan, Y. S., Cheng, N., and Xiu, G. L.:
Atmospheric mercury speciation in Shanghai, China, Sci. Total Environ., 578,
460–468, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Eckley, C. S. and Branfireun, B.: Gaseous mercury emissions from urban
surfaces: Controls and spatiotemporal trends, Appl. Geochem., 23, 369–383,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.12.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.12.008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Enrico, M., Le Roux, G., Marusczak, N., Heimburger, L. E., Claustres, A.,
Fu, X. W., Sun, R. Y., and Sonke, J. E.: Atmospheric Mercury Transfer to
Peat Bogs Dominated by Gaseous Elemental Mercury Dry Deposition,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 2405–2412,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06058</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Fang, F. M., Wang, Q. C., and Li, J. F.: Urban environmental mercury in
Changchun, a metropolitan city in Northeastern China: source, cycle, and
fate, Sci. Total Environ., 330, 159–170, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.006</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Feng, X. B., Shang, L. H., Wang, S. F., Tang, S. L., and Zheng, W.: Temporal
variation of total gaseous mercury in the air of Guiyang, China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 109, D03303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004159</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Feng, X. B., Wang, S. F., Qiu, G. A., Hou, Y. M., and Tang, S. L.: Total
gaseous mercury emissions from soil in Guiyang, Guizhou, China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 110, D14306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005643" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005643</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X., Yang, X., Tan, Q., Ming, L., Lin, T., Lin, C.-J., Li, X., and Feng,
X.: Isotopic Composition of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in the Marine Boundary
Layer of East China Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123,
7656–7669, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028671" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028671</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X., Zhang, H., Liu, C., Zhang, H., Lin, C.-J., and Feng, X.: Significant
Seasonal Variations in Isotopic Composition of Atmospheric Total Gaseous
Mercury at Forest Sites in China Caused by Vegetation and Mercury Sources,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 13748–13756,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05016</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., and Feng, X. B.: Variations of atmospheric total gaseous mercury concentrations for the sampling campaigns of 2001/2002 and 2009/2010 and implications of changes in regional emissions of atmospheric mercury, Bull. Miner. Petr. Geochem., 34, 242–249, 2015 (in Chinese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Feng, X. B., Qiu, G. L., Shang, L. H., and Zhang, H.: Speciated
atmospheric mercury and its potential source in Guiyang, China, Atmos.
Environ., 45, 4205–4212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.012</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Feng, X. B., Zhang, H., Yu, B., and Chen, L. G.: Mercury
emissions from natural surfaces highly impacted by human activities in
Guangzhou province, South China, Atmos. Environ., 54, 185–193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.008</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Heimburger, L. E., and Sonke, J. E.: Collection of atmospheric
gaseous mercury for stable isotope analysis using iodine- and
chlorine-impregnated activated carbon traps, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 29,
841–852, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3ja50356a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C3ja50356a</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Zhang, H., Yu, B., Wang, X., Lin, C.-J., and Feng, X. B.: Observations of atmospheric mercury in China: a critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9455–9476, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Marusczak, N., Wang, X., Gheusi, F., and Sonke, J. E.: Isotopic
Composition of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in the Free Troposphere of the Pic
du Midi Observatory, France, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
5641–5650, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00033</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Gabriel, M. C., Williamson, D. G., Zhang, H., Brooks, S., and Lindberg, S.:
Diurnal and seasonal trends in total gaseous mercury flux from three urban
ground surfaces, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4269–4284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.004</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Gao, W. D., Jiang, W., and Zhou, M. M.: The spatial and temporal
characteristics of mercury emission from coal combustion in China during the
year 2015, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 10, 776–783, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.12.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.12.005</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Ghosh, S., Schauble, E. A., Couloume, G. L., Blum, J. D., and Bergquist, B.
A.: Estimation of nuclear volume dependent fractionation of mercury isotopes
in equilibrium liquid-vapor evaporation experiments, Chem. Geol., 336, 5–12,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Gratz, L. E., Keeler, G. J., Blum, J. D., and Sherman, L. S.: Isotopic
composition and fractionation of mercury in Great Lakes precipitation and
ambient air, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 7764–7770, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es100383w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/Es100383w</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Gustin, M. S., Amos, H. M., Huang, J., Miller, M. B., and Heidecorn, K.: Measuring and modeling mercury in the atmosphere: a critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5697–5713, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5697-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5697-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Gustin, M. S., Dunham-Cheatham, S. M., and Zhang, L.: Comparison of 4
Methods for Measurement of Reactive, Gaseous Oxidized, and Particulate Bound
Mercury, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 14489–14495,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04648" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04648</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Corbitt, E. S., Mao, J., Yang, X., Talbot, R., and Slemr, F.: Global atmospheric model for mercury including oxidation by bromine atoms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 12037–12057, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-12037-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-12037-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Horowitz, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Y., Dibble, T. S., Slemr, F., Amos, H. M., Schmidt, J. A., Corbitt, E. S., Marais, E. A., and Sunderland, E. M.: A new mechanism for atmospheric mercury redox chemistry: implications for the global mercury budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6353–6371, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6353-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6353-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Huang, J. Y., Miller, M. B., Weiss-Penzias, P., and Gustin, M. S.:
Comparison of gaseous oxidized Hg measured by KCl-coated denuders, and Nylon
and Cation exchange Membranes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
7307–7316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es4012349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/Es4012349</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Jiskra, M., Sonke, J. E., Obrist, D., Bieser, J., Ebinghaus, R., Myhre, C.
L., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Wangberg, I., Kyllonen, K., Worthy, D., Martin, L.
G., Labuschagne, C., Mkololo, T., Ramonet, M., Magand, O., and Dommergue,
A.: A vegetation control on seasonal variations in global atmospheric
mercury concentrations, Nat. Geosci., 11, 244–250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0078-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0078-8</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Jiskra, M., Marusczak, N., Leung, K. H., Hawkins, L., Prestbo, E., and
Sonke, J. E.: Automated Stable Isotope Sampling of Gaseous Elemental Mercury
(ISO-GEM): Insights into GEM Emissions from Building Surfaces, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 53, 4346–4354, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06381" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06381</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Jiskra, M., Sonke, J. E., Agnan, Y., Helmig, D., and Obrist, D.: Insights from mercury stable isotopes on terrestrial–atmosphere exchange of Hg(0) in the Arctic tundra, Biogeosciences, 16, 4051–4064, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4051-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4051-2019</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lin, C.-J., Pan, L., Streets, D. G., Shetty, S. K., Jang, C., Feng, X., Chu, H.-W., and Ho, T. C.: Estimating mercury emission outflow from East Asia using CMAQ-Hg, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1853–1864, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1853-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1853-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Liu, H. W., Diao, X., Yu, B., Shi, J. B., Liu, Q., Yin, Y. G., Hu, L. G.,
Yuan, C. G., and Jiang, G. B.: Effect of air pollution control devices on
mercury isotopic fractionation in coal-fired power plants, Chem. Geol., 517,
1–6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.04.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.04.019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Liu, K. Y., Wu, Q. R., Wang, L., Wang, S. X., Liu, T. H., Ding, D., Tang,
Y., Li, G. L., Tian, H. Z., Duan, L., Wang, X., Fu, X. W., Feng, X. B., and
Hao, J. M.: Measure-Specific Effectiveness of Air Pollution Control on
China's Atmospheric Mercury Concentration and Deposition during 2013–2017,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 8938–8946,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02428" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02428</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Lyman, S. N. and Jaffe, D. A.: Formation and fate of oxidized mercury in
the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Nat. Geosci., 5, 114–117,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1353</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Lynam, M. M. and Keeler, G. J.: Automated speciated mercury measurements in
Michigan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 9253–9262, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es040458r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/Es040458r</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Mao, H., Cheng, I., and Zhang, L.: Current understanding of the driving mechanisms for spatiotemporal variations of atmospheric speciated mercury: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12897–12924, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12897-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12897-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Obrist, D., Agnan, Y., Jiskra, M., Olson, C. L., Colegrove, D. P., Hueber,
J., Moore, C. W., Sonke, J. E., and Helmig, D.: Tundra uptake of atmospheric
elemental mercury drives Arctic mercury pollution, Nature, 547, 201–204,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22997" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22997</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Obrist, D., Kirk, J. L., Zhang, L., Sunderland, E. M., Jiskra, M., and
Selin, N. E.: A review of global environmental mercury processes in response
to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land
use, Ambio, 47, 116–140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-1004-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-1004-9</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Peterson, C., Gustin, M., and Lyman, S.: Atmospheric mercury concentrations
and speciation measured from 2004 to 2007 in Reno, Nevada, USA, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 4646–4654, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.053</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Pirrone, N., Cinnirella, S., Feng, X., Finkelman, R. B., Friedli, H. R., Leaner, J., Mason, R., Mukherjee, A. B., Stracher, G. B., Streets, D. G., and Telmer, K.: Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5951–5964, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Rutter, A. P., Snyder, D. C., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Gonzalez-Abraham, R., Molina, L. T., Márquez, C., Cárdenas, B., and de Foy, B.: In situ measurements of speciated atmospheric mercury and the identification of source regions in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 207–220, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-207-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-207-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Yantosca, R. M., Strode, S.,
Jaegle, L., and Jaffe, D.: Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric
mercury: Global constraints from observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D02308, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007450" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007450</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Shah, V., Jaeglé, L., Gratz, L. E., Ambrose, J. L., Jaffe, D. A., Selin, N. E., Song, S., Campos, T. L., Flocke, F. M., Reeves, M., Stechman, D., Stell, M., Festa, J., Stutz, J., Weinheimer, A. J., Knapp, D. J., Montzka, D. D., Tyndall, G. S., Apel, E. C., Hornbrook, R. S., Hills, A. J., Riemer, D. D., Blake, N. J., Cantrell, C. A., and Mauldin III, R. L.: Origin of oxidized mercury in the summertime free troposphere over the southeastern US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1511–1530, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Sherman, L. S., Blum, J. D., Johnson, K. P., Keeler, G. J., Barres, J. A.,
and Douglas, T. A.: Mass-independent fractionation of mercury isotopes in
Arctic snow driven by sunlight, Nat. Geosci., 3, 173–177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/Ngeo758" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/Ngeo758</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Sonke, J. E.: A global model of mass independent mercury stable isotope
fractionation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 4577–4590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.027</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Sprovieri, F., Pirrone, N., Bencardino, M., D'Amore, F., Carbone, F., Cinnirella, S., Mannarino, V., Landis, M., Ebinghaus, R., Weigelt, A., Brunke, E.-G., Labuschagne, C., Martin, L., Munthe, J., Wängberg, I., Artaxo, P., Morais, F., Barbosa, H. D. M. J., Brito, J., Cairns, W., Barbante, C., Diéguez, M. D. C., Garcia, P. E., Dommergue, A., Angot, H., Magand, O., Skov, H., Horvat, M., Kotnik, J., Read, K. A., Neves, L. M., Gawlik, B. M., Sena, F., Mashyanov, N., Obolkin, V., Wip, D., Feng, X. B., Zhang, H., Fu, X., Ramachandran, R., Cossa, D., Knoery, J., Marusczak, N., Nerentorp, M., and Norstrom, C.: Atmospheric mercury concentrations observed at ground-based monitoring sites globally distributed in the framework of the GMOS network, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11915–11935, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11915-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11915-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Sun, G., Sommar, J., Feng, X., Lin, C.-J., Ge, M., Wang, W., Yin, R., Fu,
X., and Shang, L.: Mass-dependent and -independent fractionation of mercury
isotope during gas-phase oxidation of elemental mercury vapor by atomic Cl
and Br, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 9232–9241,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01668" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01668</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Sun, R. Y., Enrico, M., Heimburger, L. E., Scott, C., and Sonke, J. E.: A
double-stage tube furnace-acid-trapping protocol for the pre-concentration
of mercury from solid samples for isotopic analysis, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 405,
6771–6781, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7152-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7152-2</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Sun, R. Y., Streets, D. G., Horowitz, H. M., Amos, H. M., Liu, G. J.,
Perrot, V., Toutain, J. P., Hintelmann, H., Sunderland, E. M., and Sonke, J.
E.: Historical (1850–2010) mercury stable isotope inventory from
anthropogenic sources to the atmosphere, Elem. Sci. Anth., 4, 1–15,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000091" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000091</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Sun, R. Y., Jiskra, M., Amos, H. M., Zhang, Y. X., Sunderland, E. M., and
Sonke, J. E.: Modelling the mercury stable isotope distribution of Earth
surface reservoirs: Implications for global Hg cycling, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 246, 156–173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.11.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.11.036</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Swartzendruber, P. C., Jaffe, D. A., and Finley, B.: Development and First
Results of an Aircraft-Based, High Time Resolution Technique for Gaseous
Elemental and Reactive (Oxidized) Gaseous Mercury, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 43, 7484–7489, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es901390t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/Es901390t</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Tang, S., Feng, C., Feng, X., Zhu, J., Sun, R., Fan, H., Wang, L., Li, R.,
Mao, T., and Zhou, T.: Stable isotope composition of mercury forms in flue
gases from a typical coal-fired power plant, Inner Mongolia, northern China,
J. Hazard. Mater., 328, 90–97,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.014</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Tang, Y., Wang, S., Wu, Q., Liu, K., Wang, L., Li, S., Gao, W., Zhang, L., Zheng, H., Li, Z., and Hao, J.: Recent decrease trend of atmospheric mercury concentrations in East China: the influence of anthropogenic emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8279–8291, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8279-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8279-2018</a>, 2018.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): Method 1631, Revision E: Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and
Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry, United States
Environmental Protection Agency, 10–46 pp., 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Wang, D. Y., He, L., Shi, X. J., Wei, S. Q., and Feng, X. B.: Release flux
of mercury from different environmental surfaces in Chongqing, China,
Chemosphere, 64, 1845–1854, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.01.054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.01.054</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Lin, C.-J., Yuan, W., Sommar, J., Zhu, W., and Feng, X.: Emission-dominated gas exchange of elemental mercury vapor over natural surfaces in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11125–11143, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11125-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11125-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Q. R., Wang, S. X., Li, G. L., Liang, S., Lin, C. J., Wang, Y. F., Cai,
S. Y., Liu, K. Y., and Hao, J. M.: Temporal Trend and Spatial Distribution
of Speciated Atmospheric Mercury Emissions in China During 1978–2014,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 13428–13435, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Xu, H., Sonke, J. E., Guinot, B., Fu, X., Sun, R., Lanzanova, A., Candaudap,
F., Shen, Z., and Cao, J.: Seasonal and Annual Variations in Atmospheric Hg
and Pb Isotopes in Xi'an, China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 3759–3766,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06145" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06145</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Yu, B., Fu, X., Yin, R., Zhang, H., Wang, X., Lin, C.-J., Wu, C., Zhang, Y.,
He, N., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Shang, L., Sommar, J., Sonke, J. E., Maurice, L.,
Guinot, B., and Feng, X.: Isotopic Composition of Atmospheric Mercury in
China: New Evidence for Sources and Transformation Processes in Air and in
Vegetation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 9262–9269,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01782</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Wang, Z. W., Wang, C. J., and Zhang, X. S.: Concentrations and
gas-particle partitioning of atmospheric reactive mercury at an urban site
in Beijing, China, Environ. Pollut., 249, 13–23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.064</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Wang, S. X., Wang, L., and Hao, J. M.: Atmospheric mercury concentration and chemical speciation at a rural site in Beijing, China: implications of mercury emission sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10505–10516, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10505-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10505-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, B., Tong, D., Li, M., Liu, F., Hong, C., Geng, G., Li, H., Li, X., Peng, L., Qi, J., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Zheng, Y., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14095–14111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, W. and Hintelmann, H.: Nuclear Field Shift Effect in Isotope
Fractionation of Mercury during Abiotic Reduction in the Absence of Light, J.
Phys. Chem. A., 114, 4238–4245, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation> Zhu, J., Wang, T., Talbot, R., Mao, H., Hall, C. B., Yang, X., Fu, C., Zhuang, B., Li, S., Han, Y., and Huang, X.: Characteristics of atmospheric Total Gaseous Mercury (TGM) observed in urban Nanjing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 12103–12118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12103-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12103-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
