<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-5883-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Coral-reef-derived dimethyl sulfide and the climatic<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> impact of the loss of coral reefs</article-title><alt-title>Influence of coral reefs on climate</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Influence of coral reefs on climate}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S. L. Fiddes et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3 aff5">
          <name><surname>Fiddes</surname><given-names>Sonya L.</given-names></name>
          <email>sonya.fiddes@utas.edu.au</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-0845</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Woodhouse</surname><given-names>Matthew T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9892-4492</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Lane</surname><given-names>Todd P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Schofield</surname><given-names>Robyn</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4230-717X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Australian-German Climate and Energy College, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, School of Earth Sciences,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Climate Science Centre, Oceans and Atmosphere, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Research Organisation, Aspendale, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, School of Earth Sciences,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Australian Antarctic Program Partnership, Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Sonya L. Fiddes (sonya.fiddes@utas.edu.au)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>5883</fpage><lpage>5903</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>27</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e146">Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is a naturally occurring aerosol precursor gas which plays an important role in the global sulfur budget, aerosol formation and climate. While DMS is produced predominantly by phytoplankton, recent observational literature has suggested that corals and their symbionts produce a comparable amount of DMS, which is unaccounted for in models. It has further been hypothesised that the coral reef source of DMS may modulate regional climate. This hypothesis presents a particular concern given the current threat to coral reefs under anthropogenic climate change. In this paper, a global climate model with online chemistry and aerosol is used to explore the influence of coral-reef-derived DMS on atmospheric composition and climate. A simple representation of coral-reef-derived DMS is developed and added to a common DMS surface water climatology, resulting in an additional flux of 0.3 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, or 1.7 % of the global sulfur flux from DMS. By comparing the differences between both nudged and free-running ensemble simulations with and without coral-reef-derived DMS, the influence of coral-reef-derived DMS on regional climate is quantified. In the Maritime Continent–Australian region, where the highest density of coral reefs exists, a small decrease in nucleation- and Aitken-mode aerosol number concentration and mass is found when coral reef DMS emissions are removed from the system. However, these small responses are found to have no robust effect on regional climate via direct and indirect aerosol effects. This work emphasises the complexities of the aerosol–climate system, and the limitations of current modelling capabilities are highlighted, in particular surrounding convective responses to changes in aerosol. In conclusion, we find no robust evidence that coral-reef-derived DMS influences global and regional climate.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e170">Marine organisms (phytoplankton, algae) are known to produce the chemical dimethyl sulfoniopropionate (DMSP). In the ocean, DMSP experiences enzymatic cleavage, forming dimethyl sulfide (DMS; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="altparen.1"/>; see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>, point 1), which can then be released into the atmosphere (2). Atmospheric DMS (DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) can undergo a series of chemical reactions to become a sulfate aerosol (3). When in sufficiently large abundance (4), these sulfate aerosols can impact aerosol loading and cloud properties, altering the radiation budget directly (5) and indirectly (6) and having a cooling effect (7). This effect has been hypothesised to form a short-term bioregulatory negative feedback system, known as the CLAW (Charlson, Lovelock, Andreae and Warren) hypothesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.2"/>, whereby marine organisms<?pagebreak page5884?> can alter their environment when stressed. This hypothesis remains unproven, and arguments against it cite the complexity and non-linearity of the DMS–climate system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.3"/>. Nevertheless, at longer timescales, global modelling studies have shown that marine-derived DMS plays an important role in maintaining the current large-scale climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.4"/>, providing global cooling via direct and indirect aerosol effects of up to 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.5"/> when compared to a world in which no marine DMS exists. Our previous paper <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.6"/> describes these studies, DMS surface water climatologies and flux parameterisations in more detail.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e214">Schematic diagram describing the DMS–climate system. The numbers are described in detail in the text. Graphics designed by Georgina Harmer.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/5883/2021/acp-21-5883-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e223">Many global DMS–climate modelling studies have also considered DMS under future scenarios <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.7"/>. However, considering our understanding of DMS in the current climate remains uncertain, the aforementioned studies do not provide a clear consensus on how DMS production may respond to a warming climate. With this in mind, better knowledge of current sources of DMS is important to further our understanding of DMS–climate interaction now and into the future.</p>
      <p id="d1e230">One such source of DMS that is currently unaccounted for in climate modelling is coral reefs. Recent studies have shown that corals, coral symbionts, and coral by-products (e.g. mucus) produce large amounts of DMSP <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.8"/>. Of note for this work, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.9"/> have summarised reports of flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0–4906 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a mean of 205 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer and 0.6–481 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a mean of 77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over winter over the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.10"/> also suggest that total emissions from the GBR are equivalent to 0.02 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of sulfur, noting that total global sulfur flux from DMS is estimated to be between 9–35 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.11"/> and that DMS makes up approximately one-fifth of the global sulfur budget <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.12"/>. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.13"/> coral reef flux estimation has been made from measurements both over coral reefs and in the GBR lagoon and also includes an estimate of the additional flux from tropical cyclones. The tropical cyclone emission has been calculated (not observed) using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.14"/> flux parameterisation, taking into account average wind speeds of tropical cyclones and accounting for approximately five cyclone days per year in the region. However, we note that many parameterisations overestimate the DMS flux (flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) at high wind speeds.</p>
      <p id="d1e427">In addition, recent work has shown a sensitivity of DMS production by corals when stressed due to tidal exposure, warming temperatures, rainfall events and light exposure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.15"/>. Of interest to this study are the findings from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.16"/>, where the effect of tidal exposure on three Indo-Pacific coral species was studied in laboratory experiments. From their results, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.17"/> extrapolate a flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 9–35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over coral reefs from <italic>Acropora cf. horrida</italic>, while an additional 5 and 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> can be estimated from two other species in their experiments (<italic>P. cylindrica</italic> and <italic>S. hystrix.</italic>). These estimates are equivalent to a total of  709–1548 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of sulfur (if all species are present) and in this work is further extrapolated to global coral reef coverage (approximately 284 300 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), giving 0.074–0.16 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of sulfur. Whilst these extrapolations are highly speculative in terms of artificial laboratory experiments, estimated exposure time and coverage of coral reefs, and they account for just three Indo-Pacific species of coral and only DMS produced during tidal stress, the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.18"/> estimations were the first to attempt to quantify the large-scale flux of coral-reef-derived DMS.</p>
      <p id="d1e580">Following these observed results, numerous studies have made links to coral DMS, aerosol formation, cloud cover and/or sea surface temperatures (SSTs) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.19"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.20"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.21"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.22"/> further suggest that coral reefs participate in bioregulatory feedback as suggested by the CLAW hypotheses. Most of these studies do not explicitly account for the complexity of the DMS–climate system and its significant non-linearities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.23"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content></xref>. In addition, deducing a climatic impact of one aerosol species using observations alone is fraught with co-varying and confounding influences from other aerosol species. These complexities can only be addressed through modelling studies; however no modelling study has included coral-reef-derived DMS as a source of sulfur to date.</p>
      <p id="d1e600">To add urgency to this problem, coral reef ecosystems globally are facing dire risk due to anthropogenic climate change <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.24"/>. The IPCC special report on climate change <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.25"/> states that under 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C warming, 70 %–90 % of coral reefs will be extinct. The risk to coral reefs is twofold; increasing sea surface temperatures are causing more frequent mass coral bleaching events <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.26"/>, whilst increasing ocean acidification is causing reduced calcification and growth of coral species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.27"/>. Whilst the death of global coral reefs due to anthropogenic climate change will have clear impacts on the ecosystems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.28"/> and economies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.29"/> they support, a lesser known, and as of yet unquantified, impact is on the climate itself.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5885?><p id="d1e631">In light of these recent studies and the current threat to coral reefs, we raise the following questions: what is the influence of coral-reef-derived DMS on climate, including its influence on aerosol production and cloud formation, and what implications does mass coral extinction have for the climate? To address these questions, we use a global climate–chemistry model to investigate whether coral-reef-derived DMS has an impact on climate. This is the first study to estimate what implications mass coral extinction may have for global and regional climate.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>ACCESS-UKCA description</title>
      <p id="d1e649">The coupled climate–chemistry model ACCESS-UKCA (Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator–United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosol) is used in this work to quantify the importance of global coral-reef-derived sulfur. The ACCESS-UKCA physical atmospheric model is based on the Global Atmosphere 4.0 configuration of the Unified Model at Version 8.4 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.30"/>, and the UKCA model includes the state-of-the-art GLObal Model of Aerosol Processes (GLOMAP)-mode scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.31"/>. GLOMAP-mode is a two-moment microphysical aerosol scheme that simulates aerosol mass and number distributions across four soluble modes (corresponding to nucleation, Aitken, accumulation and coarse modes) and, in this work, one insoluble mode (Aitken) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.32"/>. The size distributions of these modes are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e666">The four modal size distributions used by GLOMAP-mode.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mode</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particle dry diameter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">range (nm)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nucleation (soluble)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aitken (soluble and insoluble)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5–50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Accumulation (soluble)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50–500</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coarse (soluble)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e749">GLOMAP-mode simulates coagulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.33"/>,  condensation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and secondary organics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.34"/>, new particle formation of sulfate aerosol in the free troposphere via binary homogeneous nucleation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.35"/> and organic-mediated boundary layer nucleation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.36"/>. Aqueous chemistry calculates the dissolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  into cloud droplets within the soluble accumulation and coarse modes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.37"/>, and aerosol dry deposition is calculated following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.38"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="text.39"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.40"/>. GLOMAP-mode includes particle compositions of sulfate, sea salt and elemental and organic carbon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.41"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e825">The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.42"/> DMS surface water concentration (DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) climatology is used in this work. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.43"/> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.44"><named-content content-type="pre">and before that</named-content></xref> used a global database of observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.45"/> to derive a gridded global DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> climatology<?pagebreak page5886?> via a piecewise cubic Hermite interpolation technique over 54 well-defined biogeographic ocean provinces. This climatology is the standard for most global climate modelling studies and is discussed in more detail in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.46"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e864">In this work, as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.47"/>, the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.48"/> flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterisation is used, and a full description of this scheme can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.49"/>. Detailed discussion about flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterisation choices and sensitivities can also be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.50"/>. In short, the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.51"/> scheme calculates the flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under three wind-induced sea states representing smooth (10 m wind speeds less than 3.6 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and rough (10 m wind speeds between 3.6 and 13 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) gas transfer as well as wave breaking and bubble bursting (10 m wind speeds greater than 13 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.52"/> is considered a conservative parameterisation and was chosen for this work based on recommendations by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="text.53"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.54"/> that suggest many parameterisation overestimate the flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e965">With online chemistry, ACCESS-UKCA includes four key oxidative pathways to convert DMS into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can then be further oxidised into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>), after which it can contribute to aerosol growth or new particle formation. Description of these processes can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.55"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1017">The oxidative pathways relevant to DMS in ACCESS-UKCA as defined in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.56"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="1">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMSO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMSO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MSA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1235">Anthropogenic emissions, pre- and post-2000 respectively, are provided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.57"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="text.58"/> and biomass emissions by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="text.59"/>. Emissions of other species (biogenic, primary aerosol) are described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.60"/>. SSTs and sea ice are prescribed following the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.61"/>. The UKCA is coupled to the ACCESS model via the radiation scheme and the large-scale cloud and precipitation schemes; both the direct and indirect aerosol forcing are modelled. ACCESS-UKCA has a resolution of 1.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.875<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude with 85 vertical levels. Where the model is nudged, ERA-Interim <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.62"/> is used at 6-hourly intervals (via horizontal wind components and potential temperature; see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/> for more details). Further model details and evaluation are available in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.63"/>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>DMS climatologies</title>
      <p id="d1e1296">We have developed a DMS surface water concentration (DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) climatology based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.64"/>, in which additional DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over coral reef regions is included. To determine the amount of DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to be added to the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.65"/> climatology, we first needed to know where coral reefs were located globally. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.66"/> global coral reef distribution database was used to calculate the fraction of each ACCESS-UKCA grid box covered by coral reefs. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.67"/> database is the most comprehensive global database of warm water coral reefs, 85 % of which was drawn from the Millennium Coral Reef Mapping Project, a remote sensing project at spatial resolutions of up to 30 m.</p>
      <p id="d1e1339">The gridded areal distribution drawn from the coral reef database, shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, was then used to weight a fixed concentration of DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to be added to the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.68"/> DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> climatology. For example, the maximum fraction in any grid box found in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> is 15.6 % in the northern GBR. In this study, we used 50 nM as the fixed concentration (a number of different DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were tested, from 10 to 500 nM). Therefore, at this grid box, with the highest density of coral reefs, the amount of DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> added to the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.69"/> climatology as a coral reef source is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.156</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nM. The choice of 50 nM was somewhat subjective, in part due to the relatively few estimations of large-scale coral reef production of DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S1"/>. Nevertheless, below we describe how this choice aligns with observations found in the literature. In addition, we made a conscious choice to create a climatology that represents a plausible maximum DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in an attempt to ensure a response to this perturbation. We note that at this initial stage, the DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> climatology developed here does not vary in time beyond that of the monthly <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.70"/> dataset.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1440">The areal fraction of each ACCESS-UKCA grid box covered by warm water coral reefs as indicated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.71"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/5883/2021/acp-21-5883-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page5887?><p id="d1e1453">The weighted addition of 50 nM of DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> caused a global mean increase of 0.03 nM and an additional flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.3 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.72"/> climatology and the additional coral reef flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. These increases do not impact the global sulfur budget, contributing only 1.7 % of additional sulfur to the global flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The 50 nM climatology adds a mean of 0.74 nM and a maximum of 7.8 nM to coral reef regions, values that are within those found in the literature. The additional daily flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> simulated by ACCESS-UKCA over coral reefs, shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b (maximum of 621.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), is similar to that of the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.73"/> estimations of flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> due to three coral species in response to tidal stress (708.9–1547.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S). Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.74"/> suggest that the total flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the GBR and surrounding lagoon is approximately 0.002 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. If this number is extrapolated to global coral reef regions, then an annual flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.12 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S is estimated. The values from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.75"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.76"/> estimations both suggest that the amount of DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> attributed to coral reefs in this study is within the high end of what is currently observed.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1671"><bold>(a)</bold> The flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) based on the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.77"/> DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> climatology and <bold>(b)</bold> the additional flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the climatology with added coral-reef-derived DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In panel <bold>(a)</bold> the Maritime Continent–Australian region is shown by a red box, the Australian land-only region by a green box and the Queensland (QLD) land-only region by a blue box. Additionally, four single points used for analysis are shown over the Great Barrier Reef (GBR – yellow), Papua New Guinea (PNG – pink), the eastern Pacific (E.Pac – orange) and QLD (blue).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/5883/2021/acp-21-5883-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1760">However, it is noted that the values stated here are averages over large grid boxes and so likely overestimate the extent of coral reef influence. Nevertheless, the 50 nM perturbation was chosen in part to ensure that if no significant changes in the atmosphere were found, it would not be because the additional coral reef DMS was too small.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Experiment set-up</title>
      <p id="d1e1771">To study the impact of coral-reef-derived DMS in ACCESS-UKCA, two sets of simulations were performed: nudged and free-running. In both sets of simulations, a control (using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.78"/>, climatology, referred to as L11) and experimental simulation (using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.79"/>, climatology with additional coral and hereafter referred to as the L11C50 simulation) were completed. The nudged simulations follow the methods described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.80"/>, in which the control and coral simulations were nudged to the ERA-Interim dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.81"/> in the free troposphere at 6-hourly intervals using horizontal winds and potential temperature. We note that by nudging the model, we limit the model's ability to respond to the DMS flux perturbations. However, nudged simulations, by restricting meteorological feedbacks, give us an indication as to which responses are purely dynamical as opposed to those that may in fact be caused directly by DMS perturbations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1786">In the second set-up, the model was allowed to freely run, with no nudging applied. In both sets of simulations, SSTs are prescribed. Without nudging, feedbacks from the meteorology, such as changes in wind fields, are able to manifest within the model. In the free-running simulations, much greater model variability manifested, and differentiating between a true signal from the perturbed DMS field and internal model variability was difficult. For this reason, seven simulations (for both the L11 and L11C50), each of 10 years, were performed with the free-running set-up to provide an ensemble. Each set of simulations used different atmospheric initial conditions from a previous nudged simulation, taken at 00:00 UTC on 1 January for 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 (noting that 1997 was excluded as it was a strong El Niño year). Whilst this exercise was computationally expensive, it was able to provide sufficient data to perform statistical analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <?pagebreak page5888?><p id="d1e1797">The following regions were defined for statistical analysis: the Maritime Continent–Australian (MC-Aus) region from 17.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 95.625 to 153.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; the Queensland (QLD) land-only region from 30 to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 138.75 to 153.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; and the Australian land-only region from 45 to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 112.5 to 153.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. Four grid points were selected for analysis of aerosol size distribution: a location off the coast of Papua New Guinea (PNG) at 10.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 151<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; a point in the East Pacific (E.Pac) at 10.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 165<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; a location over the GBR at 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 151<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; and a point in inland QLD at 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 140<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. These regions and points are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a. In addition the boundary of the South Pacific convergence zone (SPCZ) is defined as the area within the 6 mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or greater precipitation threshold <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.82"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1955">To test the significance of differences in a given field, the two-tailed Student <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.83"/> and the respective field significance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.84"/> are used. Both of these methods have been evaluated at confidence levels of the 95th percentile (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) unless otherwise stated. In addition to this, ensemble agreement, where at least five out of the seven ensemble members agree on the change in sign, has been shown as stippling as a further indicator of confidence.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Impacts of coral-reef-derived DMS over the MC-Aus region</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>DMS and sulfur dioxide</title>
      <p id="d1e1999">This section describes the changes in atmospheric DMS (DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) when coral reefs are removed (L11 minus L11C50), noting that the results are presented this way in order to demonstrate what the impact of the loss of coral reefs may be on the climate system. The annual differences in DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (with respect to the L11C50 simulation, shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a) for the nudged simulations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b) and the free-running ensemble (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c) are spatially very similar to each other and to the respective change in flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b). Good agreement across the ensemble is found with the free-running simulations over reef regions. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d–g show, for both the free and nudged simulations, a strong seasonal signal over the MC-Aus region in terms of both mean value and the range of values. A seasonal signal is found in both the DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>) and is in part due to the variation of the L11 DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> climatology. In DJF, the range of results from the ensemble is larger than that of any other season, and it appears that the free-running meteorology is actually dampening the response of DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the nudged runs. This damped response is not surprising as surface wind speeds were found to be stronger in this region at this time in the free ensemble (not shown). Increased wind speeds in the free ensemble cause an increased flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to a smaller decrease in flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> than in the nudged run. Such examples of wind-driven DMS responses are also found in other locations (and in other seasons), including over the Southern Ocean at around 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W (see annual plots in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c). These responses highlight the complexity of the DMS–climate system. In addition, wind-driven responses in other aerosol sources are found in regions around the globe (e.g. from sea salt and dust) but are not discussed further here.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2130">Seasonal changes over the Maritime Continent–Australian region as a percent (except for SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which are an absolute change in W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for both the free-running ensemble (F) and the nudged simulations (N). Number density is abbreviated to ND and mass to MS for each of the four aerosol modes (nucleation, Aitken, accumulation and coarse).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Field</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Run</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DJF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MAM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">JJA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SON</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nuc. ND</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nuc. MS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ait. ND</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ait. MS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Acc. ND</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Acc. MS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coa. ND</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coa. MS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AOD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CDN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LWP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Water vapour</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Low cloud frac.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4379">Continued.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Field</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Run</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DJF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MAM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">JJA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SON</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">High cloud frac.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Precip.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Large-scale precip.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Convective precip.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.015</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e4382"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Statistically significant at the 95th percentile, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Statistically significant at the 90th percentile, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4933">The annual surface DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (ppt) for the L11C50 simulation <bold>(a)</bold> and the L11–L11C50 difference for the nudged simulations <bold>(b)</bold> and free-running ensemble <bold>(c)</bold>. In panel <bold>(c)</bold> the model agreement, where at least five of the seven ensemble pairs agree in the sign of the difference, is shown by stippling. Panels <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(g)</bold> show violin plots of the average seasonal difference (L11–L11C50) in DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the MC-Aus region as a percentage, where all years in the ensemble are shown by the distribution, the dashed lines represent the 25, 50 and 75th percentiles, the grey dots show each pair of models mean difference, red represents the ensemble average and yellow represents the nudged average.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/5883/2021/acp-21-5883-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4981">As for Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> but for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in parts per billion (ppb) <bold>(a)</bold> and percent <bold>(b–g)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/5883/2021/acp-21-5883-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5009">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that are spatially similar to those of DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However the reductions around smaller coral reefs, such as those in the central Pacific, Indian or Caribbean oceans, are of lesser magnitude than those of the coral reefs in the MC-Aus region. This is true for both the nudged (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b) and the free simulations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c), which implies that these areas of lower reef density are unlikely to have a significant impact on regional climate. In terms of seasonality, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d–g indicate less <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability compared to DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the year for both the free and nudged simulations. MAM (March, April, May) has the smallest, statistically insignificant change (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.3 % for the free and nudged simulations respectively), while DJF (December, January, February) and JJA (June, July, August) show larger changes over the MC-Aus region of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.2 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.8 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the free ensemble and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.2 %  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the nudged runs. The violin plots indicate there is a similar degree of variability for each of these seasons (compared to DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the influence of free-running meteorology is again noted where changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are found outside of coral reef regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Nucleation- and Aitken-mode aerosol</title>
      <p id="d1e5159">The removal of coral-reef-derived DMS leads to a significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) decline in nucleation-mode aerosol number concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.1 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.0 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.2 % for MAM, JJA and SON respectively in the free ensemble over the MC-Aus region (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). In the nudged simulations, nucleation-mode number concentration decreases by 4.6 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in SON and by 4.4 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in MAM. Although not statistically significant, JJA continues to show the largest changes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.1 %) and DJF the smallest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.8 %) in the nudged runs. The changes in nucleation-mode number concentration are strongly reflected in the number concentrations of particles greater than 3 nm dry diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) which are shown annually in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. The violin plots in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>d–g show a large range in the response in DJF while a much smaller range in SON, with many of the individual free-running pairs agreeing on the magnitude of the change.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5254">As for Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> but for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in number per cubic centimetre (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(a)</bold> and percent <bold>(b–g)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/5883/2021/acp-21-5883-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5294">These small aerosols (nucleation-mode-sized) show a greater response to changes in DMS than the larger aerosol sizes (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>) in both the free and nudged simulations, aligning with the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.85"/>. This result indicates that fewer homogeneous nucleation events are occurring in the free troposphere as a result of removing coral-reef-derived DMS. Hence, fewer particles are being entrained back into the boundary layer. This process is confirmed by the vertical profile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showing a decrease in the upper levels of the atmosphere (not shown).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e5316">Aerosol dry diameter in nanometres (nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis) and number concentration (as a function of number over the log of the diameter) in cubic centimetres (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis), both in log scales, for four regions: off the coast of PNG (blues), in the East Pacific (reds/oranges), over the GBR (green/turquoise) and inland QLD (yellow/brown), for the L11C50 (dashed lines) and L11 simulations (solid lines) (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b for regions), for four seasons: DJF <bold>(a)</bold>, MAM <bold>(b)</bold>, JJA <bold>(c)</bold> and SON <bold>(d)</bold>. The lines show the ensemble mean for the free-running simulations, and the shaded regions show the range of results from all years in the ensemble.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/5883/2021/acp-21-5883-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page5890?><p id="d1e5366">The size distributions shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> at four grid points also show the larger decreases are occurring in the nucleation mode and the Aitken mode. The range of locations shown by the size distribution, including directly over coral reefs (GBR and PNG) and remotely from coral reefs (East Pacific and QLD), demonstrates that the effect of coral-reef-derived DMS loss is not restricted to directly over coral reef regions. This is shown notably at the QLD location for JJA in both the nucleation and Aitken modes and SON for the Aitken mode. Over the MC-Aus region, decreases in the soluble Aitken aerosol number occur in MAM and JJA of 1.9 % and 2.1 % respectively (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The changes in both the nucleation- and Aitken-mode number concentrations are accompanied by similar changes in aerosol mass at this size (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Accumulation- and coarse-mode aerosol</title>
      <?pagebreak page5891?><p id="d1e5393">At the larger sizes (soluble accumulation and coarse modes) little change in aerosol number is found on average over the MC-Aus region. However, significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) decreases in aerosol mass are found in the coarse mode during DJF, JJA and SON and in the accumulation mode in DJF (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and JJA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the free-running ensemble (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). Declines of smaller magnitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are found for the nudged runs. For the free ensemble, the larger change in mass instead of number suggests a reduction in aerosol growth at these sizes as the larger aerosol sizes rely on condensational growth and cloud processing to interact with DMS-derived sulfate. One exception to the observed change in mass instead of number is the region east of PNG, which varies by season (not shown). In this region, a small increase in accumulation-mode aerosol number is found, accompanied by a larger increase in the aerosol mass. This increase is more evident in the nudged runs.</p>
      <p id="d1e5446">So far we show that the largest response in aerosol due to loss of coral-reef-derived DMS occurs over the MC-Aus region. For this reason, all subsequent plots focus on the MC-Aus region. It is noted that there are impacts on aerosol from the free-running meteorology outside of this domain, but these can mostly be explained by changes in surface wind speeds due to variability in the free-running ensemble (not shown). In addition, the influence of the free-running<?pagebreak page5892?> meteorology is found to have a larger impact on the results in subsequent analysis, with greater seasonal variation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Cloud condensation nuclei</title>
      <p id="d1e5457">Despite the removal of coral-reef-derived aerosol having the largest impact on the nucleation-mode aerosol, these small aerosols do not interact with model radiation via direct or indirect aerosol effects. While the changes are small in the larger sized aerosol number and mass, a cumulative response to the loss of coral-reef-derived sulfur has some interesting impacts. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> shows the column-integrated seasonal cloud condensation nuclei with a dry diameter greater than 70 nm (CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) response to removal of coral-reef-derived DMS. For the nudged simulations in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b, f, j and n, a consistent, yet small and insignificant reduction in CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is found over the MC-Aus region (between 0.6 % and 0.9 %). Interestingly, over the SPCZ region, decreases of 1.0 %, 0.3 %, 1.9 % and 1.1 % are also found in the nudged simulations for each season (DJF, MAM, JJA and SON) respectively. The SPCZ is a relatively clean region, with few CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-sized aerosols (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a) and also few coral reefs. This lack of direct aerosol source suggests that changes in aerosol from other regions are affecting this region via transport along the SPCZ.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e5496">The seasonal (DJF – first row, MAM – second row, JJA – third row and SON – fourth row) total-column CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (in cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the broad MC-Aus region for the free L11C50 simulation (first column); the L11–L11C50 difference for the nudged simulations (second column); and the L11–L11C50 difference for the free-running ensemble (third column) with the model agreement shown by stippling, where at least five of the seven ensemble pairs agree in the sign of the difference. The fourth column shows violin plots of the average seasonal difference (L11–L11C50) in total-column CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the MC-Aus region as a percentage, where all years in the ensemble are shown by the distribution, the dashed lines represent the 25, 50 and 75th percentiles, the grey dots show the mean of each pair of models, the red dots show the ensemble average and the yellow dots show the nudged average.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/5883/2021/acp-21-5883-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5535">For the free ensemble, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c, g, k and o, the SPCZ region again stands out in MAM, JJA and SON, with decreases in CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2.8 %, 2.2 % and 1.9 % for each season respectively (MAM and SON, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and JJA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In this region, little change in surface wind speeds is found, suggesting that the changes found here are also likely due to loss of aerosol from coral reefs and their subsequent transport, as seen in the nudged runs.</p>
      <p id="d1e5574">Over the MC-Aus region in the free-running ensemble, JJA and SON have decreases in CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively). The violin plots in the far right column of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> indicate large model spread in the CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes. SON (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>o) has the most ensemble agreement over the MC-Aus region, while little agreement is observed in other seasons. For this reason (and because the subsequent dynamical results to be discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS5"/> onwards were<?pagebreak page5893?> the largest in this season), the SON results will be shown and discussed from this point only (although the statistics for all seasons can be found in the continuation of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e5635">Whilst the changes in aerosol discussed in this section are small, it is worth noting that in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.86"/>, where all marine DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was removed, a global decrease of 8 % of all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (17 % for Australia) was found. For CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, a decrease of just 5 % was found globally (8 % for Australia). It is clear from the perturbation of total marine DMS that global DMS contributes only a small amount to the total aerosol number. Hence local differences from coral-reef-derived DMS found in this study could be considered to be relatively large.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Direct aerosol radiative effects</title>
      <p id="d1e5679">Aerosols in the Aitken, accumulation and coarse modes are used by the ACCESS-UKCA radiation scheme to calculate aerosol direct effects. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>, the SON aerosol optical depth (AOD), clear-sky outgoing shortwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere (abbreviated to SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and clear-sky incoming shortwave radiation at the surface (SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are shown. The clear-sky radiation fields are examined in this section to allow for the detection of direct effects from aerosol without the influence of clouds. Changes in the all sky fields are dominated by the convective cloud response, which will be discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e5720">SON averages over the MC-Aus region for first row: the AOD (unitless and changes in percentage); second row: SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); third row: SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); and fourth row: column-average specific humidity (g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and percent). The first column shows the free L11C50 simulation; the second column shows the L11–L11C50 difference for the nudged simulations; the third column shows the L11–L11C50 difference for the free-running ensemble with the model agreement shown by stippling, where at least five of the seven ensemble pairs agree in the sign of the difference; and the fourth column shows violin plots of the average seasonal differences (L11–L11C50) as a percentage for AOD and specific humidity and in watts per square metre (W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where all years in the ensemble are shown by the distribution; the dashed lines represent the 25, 50 and 75th percentiles; the grey dots show each pair of models mean, the red dots the ensemble average and the yellow dots the nudged average.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/5883/2021/acp-21-5883-2021-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5842">The spatial response of AOD to changes in aerosol in the nudged simulations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b) is broadly similar to the CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>n). Decreasing AOD is found over most of the MC-Aus region, while the area to the east of PNG experiences an increase. The seemingly amplified aerosol response in the PNG region is due to the increased accumulation-mode sulfate mass. This increase is not believed to be associated with coral-reef-derived DMS removal but a function of<?pagebreak page5894?> complex non-linearities and model sensitivities. This anomaly is likely to be dampening the area averages over the MC-Aus region.</p>
      <p id="d1e5859">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>f, the change in nudged SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistent with the change seen in AOD, indicating that there is a weak reduction in the amount of shortwave radiation being reflected out to space at the top of the atmosphere over significant coral reef regions. This decrease in SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests more shortwave radiation is passing through the atmosphere and reaching the surface. For the nudged runs, this is broadly true, as shown by the SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>j. These results indicate that when no interaction with meteorology is allowed, a weak, statistically insignificant direct aerosol effect is associated with certain regions over the MC under clear-sky conditions in austral spring.</p>
      <p id="d1e5914">For the free-running ensemble, however, the result is far less clear, primarily due to interactions with meteorology. The AOD response (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c) is again broadly consistent with the changes in CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>o), where over the MC-Aus region a decrease of 1.7 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is found. The SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> responds as expected with a decrease of 0.11 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the MC-Aus region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with considerable model agreement). However, the subsequent SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>k) is not as clear. While the SON MC-Aus average suggests a weak, insignificant increase in shortwave radiation reaching the surface, the spatial patterns are inconsistent with the AOD, aerosol fields or the SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e6017">In ACCESS-UKCA, the shortwave (defined as wavelengths between 0.2 and 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) radiative transfer scheme considers not just the scattering and absorption of energy by aerosol and cloud droplets, but also the absorption of energy by water vapour <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.87"/>. Water vapour has an effect at wavelengths greater than 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>o, the mean change in water vapour throughout the column is shown, which is more spatially consistent with the free-running SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response than that of the AOD or SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This consistency is particularly clear over the Australian region. An increase in water vapour in the column would suggest more absorption of radiation throughout the column, and hence less energy is received at the surface, as found in the SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>k). Upper level warming over the tropics (not shown) is also found, and we note that changes in temperatures nearer the surface are limited due to the prescribed SSTs. It is emphasised that this interaction of energy with water vapour is only found in the free ensemble, when meteorology is allowed to vary.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e6094">The zonal mean vertical profiles over the MC-Aus longitudinal region for vertical velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>a, b</bold>) in centimetres per second (cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),  water vapour <bold>(c, d)</bold> in grams per kilogram (g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component of wind <bold>(e, f)</bold> in metres per second (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the free-running L11C50 simulation <bold>(a, c, e)</bold> and the difference in L11-L11C50 the free ensemble <bold>(b, d, f)</bold>, with the model agreement shown by stippling where at least five of the seven ensemble pairs agree in the sign of the difference. For panels <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold>, the dashed black lines in all plots represent the zero contour of the L11C50 field, while in panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> the solid grey line indicates the zero contour of the L11 field.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/5883/2021/acp-21-5883-2021-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6188">The cause of the change in water vapour is difficult to determine as it is intricately linked to both local- and large-scale climate processes. For example, meteorological effects found in this study that could explain the water vapour increase include the following:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6193">warming at upper levels (15–20 km) of the atmosphere over the tropics (not shown), indicating more water vapour can be held in the atmosphere, but could also be a result of increased water vapour;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6197">increased latent heat flux at the surface over the Australian region (not shown), suggesting increased evaporation;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6201">a general increase in vertical motion found for the Southern Hemisphere tropics–mid-latitudes  (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b), aligning neatly with the regions of increased water vapour (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>d), and accompanied by decreased southwards transport at upper levels and decreased northwards transport at the surface (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>f), suggesting a weakening of the southern branch of the Hadley cell;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6211">increased high-level cloud and convective precipitation found over the MC-Aus region, causing increased high cloud cover, an overall decrease in SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and increased convective precipitation.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e6226">It is hypothesised that the small reduction in aerosol resulting from decreased DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has caused an increase in shortwave radiation passing through the atmospheric column, resulting in warming, which may cause increased evaporation, vertical transport and convective activity and subsequently increased water vapour. Despite many of the responses described above having good ensemble agreement, low confidence is attributed to this hypothesis for three reasons:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6240">The top-of-the atmosphere direct radiative effect that is proposed to initiate these responses is small. Furthermore, the changes in aerosol and AOD that have caused the radiative effect are also small and insignificant. Hence it is unreasonable to suggest such small changes in aerosol could be causing a direct radiative effect.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6244">Over the MC-Aus region as a whole, little statistical significance is found in these responses, and ensemble agreement can be found in regions that are seemingly not associated with coral-reef-derived DMS. Thus, internal model variability cannot be ruled out as the cause for these meteorological responses.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6248">In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.88"/>, where all marine DMS-derived aerosol was removed from the system, decreases in convective activity were found over the tropics, despite those simulations being nudged (nudging allows small differences in meteorology if the forcing is large enough). The change in convective activity induced by removing all DMS is of the opposite sign to that found here.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e6254">Therefore, despite a weak yet significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) decline in SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it is concluded that over the MC-Aus region, no robust impact on climate via the direct radiative effect can be confidently detected. This result may be due to averaging over a large area, as the same processes are found over QLD with generally greater statistical significance and ensemble agreement. This is discussed further in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Indirect aerosol radiative effects in the large-scale cloud and precipitation scheme</title>
      <p id="d1e6295">Indirect aerosol effects, such as cloud brightening or lifetime effects, take place as CCN particles activate and become cloud droplets. In ACCESS-UKCA, aerosol activation depends on the size and composition of aerosol as well as the atmospheric supersaturation, which is influenced by the vertical velocity. Thus, the significant increase in smaller size aerosol found in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/> may have some influence over indirect aerosol effects in certain conditions, although it is noted that larger aerosols have a much greater ability to influence indirect effects. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> shows the responses of cloud droplet number (CDN), cloud liquid water path (LWP) and low cloud fraction (noting that only the cloud microphysics scheme can respond to change in CDN, not the convective scheme). For both the nudged and free simulations, the changes found in CDN are consistent with, though weaker than, the changes observed in the CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fields<?pagebreak page5896?> (noting again the vertical integral of CDN through the column is shown). No statistical significance is attributed to the changes in CDN over the MC-Aus region, although reasonable ensemble agreement is found in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>c. These weak changes suggest that the reductions in CDN are unlikely to have an effect on cloud properties or large-scale precipitation (via the second indirect effect where fewer CDN, given the same availability of liquid water, would increase rainfall).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e6315">As for Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> but for column integrals of CDN (first row) in square centimetres (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), LWP (second row) in kilograms per square metre (kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and percent and low cloud fraction (third row) as a fraction and in percent.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/5883/2021/acp-21-5883-2021-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page5897?><p id="d1e6350">A small increase in LWP is found on average over the MC-Aus region in the free simulations, although <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>g–h<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> show a large amount of variability in the region and little model agreement. This change in CDN and LWP has had little impact on properties such as low cloud fraction (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>k) or large-scale precipitation (not shown), as shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>, over the MC-Aus region for each season. In addition there is very little model agreement in these responses. For the nudged simulations, constrained meteorology has meant little response of cloud properties is allowed. Subsequently, these results suggest that the loss of coral-reef-derived aerosol has little or no impact on climate via the indirect aerosol effects.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Implications for Queensland, Australia</title>
      <p id="d1e6372">A relatively large increase in precipitation, of 11 %, has been found over QLD in response to removal of DMS produced by coral. Although approximately equivalent increases were found in the large-scale and convective precipitation (10.9 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 9.4 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), very little large-scale precipitation occurs in this region, with convective precipitation by far the more important of the two. Furthermore, while CDN concentrations have decreased insignificantly (by 0.5 %) and the LWP has increased (7.4 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the QLD region, resulting in more large-scale rainfall, attributing the change in LWP in particular to changes in aerosol is difficult, as discussed in the previous sections.</p>
      <p id="d1e6411">At this point, it is worth remembering that the convective scheme is not coupled to the aerosol scheme and thus has no knowledge of the removal of coral-reef-derived DMS. Hence the increased convective activity must be occurring dynamically, with possible causes discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS5"/>. Specifically, over QLD, a significant decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 5 % is found (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Although this does not translate into a meaningful decrease of CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.5 %), a significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) decline in the AOD is found of 1.6 %, which has resulted in less SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.16 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). As for the MC-Aus region, the increased radiation allowed through the atmospheric column has been absorbed by increased water vapour (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>o), resulting in a significant reduction in SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.38 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). While high cloud cover has increased by 7.4 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which in turn has caused a decrease in SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.61 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), linking these convective responses to the changes in direct aerosol effect<?pagebreak page5898?> at the top of the atmosphere is not able to be done with confidence.</p>
      <p id="d1e6601">Due to increased high cloud cover, the relatively large change in all sky surface solar radiation is of the opposite sign to what one would expect following the aerosol direct and indirect theories. Further, it is noted that the changes in the all-sky radiation are much larger than those of the clear-sky radiation and indicate that the response in cloud cover is much more important for radiative processes in this region than the direct aerosol effects.</p>
      <p id="d1e6604">Despite the changes presented in this section for QLD having greater statistical significance and more ensemble agreement than over the MC-Aus region, low confidence is attached to these results due to an unclear physical mechanism (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS5"/>) and the existence of similar responses elsewhere that are likely to be model noise (not shown). It is emphasised that the meteorological results discussed above are considered to be a response to a direct aerosol radiative effect, only possible when meteorological feedbacks are allowed. Nevertheless, these results were interesting and unexpected, demonstrating a clear example of how non-linear the DMS–climate system is and how important it is to consider the system as a whole, rather than isolating certain aspects.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e6618">This study set out to determine if the loss of coral-reef-derived DMS could impact global and regional climate. The ability of coral reefs to produce an aerosol precursor gas has been known for some time; however the impact of this source of sulfur on the climate has not been quantified until now. On the global scale, coral reefs appear to have little influence on the sulfur budget or global energy balance. At regional scales, however, this work has found some interesting and unexpected effects that highlight the complexity of this system.</p>
      <p id="d1e6621">The MC-Aus region has been found to have the largest aerosol response to removal of coral-reef-derived DMS across the globe. This is unsurprising given that this region has the highest density of coral reefs in the world. Over other coral reef regions, the effects of coral-reef-derived DMS are quickly diluted by other influencing factors, such as anthropogenic aerosol sources. Significant decreases in the free-running ensemble's small size aerosol (both number and mass) are found over the MC-Aus region when coral-reef-derived DMS is removed. For the larger sized aerosols, small, generally insignificant decreases in sulfate mass are found, while little change in number is noted. The nudged simulation shows a more consistent small decrease across all aerosol fields and seasons. The decreases in aerosol have cumulatively led to an insignificant decrease in SON of AOD in the MC-Aus region and a significant decrease of AOD over QLD. No significant or robust changes were detected in other seasons.</p>
      <p id="d1e6624">Despite the weak AOD response over the MC-Aus region, a significant reduction in SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.11 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was found for SON in the free-running ensemble and is attributed, in part, to the reduction of aerosol (despite its statistical insignificance) in the region. This decrease is greater than the equivalent decrease in the nudged simulations. Much smaller (or no) reductions were found in all other seasons. In contrast to the nudged simulations, the free-running SON reduction in SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not directly translate to similar increases in SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as expected. The most likely explanation is that interaction of shortwave radiation with water vapour causes the opposite SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effect, which is itself a result of complex meteorological feedbacks. The response of water vapour could not be confidently attributed to changes in aerosol (as opposed to model variability between ensemble members), and the direct effects at the top of the atmosphere are found to be weak. For these reasons, this work concludes that no robust direct aerosol effects can be confidently associated with coral-reef-derived DMS.</p>
      <p id="d1e6711">We have found little to no evidence of indirect aerosol effects in any region in response to coral reef DMS. This is unsurprising given the small and insignificant changes found in the CDN and also the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.89"/>, where few indirect effects were observed outside of the clean marine regions of the Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes. However, it may also be a result of the lack of coupling between the convective scheme and aerosol in the model. Coral reefs, by nature, are located in tropical regions that are dominated by convective processes. Hence, it is possible that no indirect effects were found in this work simply because such effects are only allowed to occur in the large-scale scheme, which is not particularly active in the regions of interest.</p>
      <p id="d1e6718">How convection may interact with changes in aerosol is currently a large source of uncertainty <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.90"/>. Aerosol-induced convective invigoration theories suggest that with less aerosol, CDN would rain out more quickly, reducing the amount of latent heat release caused by condensation, thus inhibiting convection. This mechanism has been found in both simulations and observations with respect to increased anthropogenic ultrafine aerosol over the Amazon invigorating deep convection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.91"/>. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.92"/> have demonstrated that while satellite observations correlate high aerosol loading to increased convection, the presence of aerosol may not be the cause of convective activity due to the co-variation of aerosol–wind and wind–cloud processes. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.93"/> summarise that the influence of aerosol on convection is highly dependent on different kinds of convective systems (e.g. the trigger mechanism, whether it is a super cell) and the environment (e.g. wind shear, cloud base temperature). The studies discussed above and the results of this work indicate that tropical aerosol interaction with climate is far from linear and requires significantly more work to integrate both the convective and large-scale responses in climate modelling.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5899?><p id="d1e6733">Interestingly, this study has found some unexpected changes in convective processes, via dynamical mechanisms, including a significant increase of 10.9 % in convective rainfall over QLD, attributed to suppressed downwards motion in the region. However, low confidence is given to the physical cause (weak direct radiative effects) of the changes in vertical motion in this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e6736">It should be noted that the weak direct effects discussed above  consider clear-sky processes only. The changes in convective processes result in significant changes in high-cloud fraction. Increased cloud cover subsequently has large impacts on the all-sky radiation response (decreased SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Surf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), overwhelming any clear-sky responses. This again highlights the complexity of the system and issues a warning to the oversimplification, or perhaps more appropriately, the lack of detailed understanding surrounding the current limitations of aerosol effects in climate models, especially as aerosol schemes are more routinely used in climate models.</p>
      <p id="d1e6750">The tool used for this work, ACCESS-UKCA, is able to provide detailed diagnostics of the DMS–climate system; however, important model limitations remain. By conducting a global study, a limitation of this work is the model resolution, both with respect to model time steps (hourly) and output (monthly), as well as spatial resolution. Higher resolution aerosol–cloud interaction studies have been planned with respect to coral-reef-derived DMS to address this issue. In addition, by allowing the model to run freely, disentangling responses due to coral-reef-derived DMS as opposed to internal model variability has been difficult. While an effort to resolve this problem has been made by creating a seven-member ensemble (limited by computer resources) and comparing to nudged simulations, there remains a significant likelihood that some of the results presented in the work are purely from internal model variability. Despite this difficulty, we suggest that future aerosol–climate interaction studies use a large enough ensemble to reduce the signal due to internal variability and that significant analysis of the dynamical aspects of any aerosol response is performed to ensure a robust physical mechanism is found explaining meteorological changes. Double-call radiation diagnostics can also be a useful tool in this instance to diagnose model feedbacks if computer resources permit.</p>
      <p id="d1e6753">Further limitations of this model are the underlying biases in clouds and radiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.94"/> and the lack of representation of some microphysical processes, which can have important effects on how aerosols interact with the climate. In particular we note the single-moment cloud microphysics used in this version of ACCESS places a limitation on the modelling of indirect aerosol effects, despite the double-moment aerosol scheme. Of note, evaluation performed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.95"/> showed that ACCESS-UKCA significantly underestimated cloud fractions at all levels, which led to overestimated SW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The responses found here in cloud and radiation are well within the model uncertainties reported in the literature and are smaller than the model biases themselves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.96"><named-content content-type="pre">found in</named-content></xref>. In effect, improved model representation of the climate system may have a larger impact on the energy balance than the small perturbation applied in this work. The sensitivity of global climate models to changes in model structure has been highlighted recently, where new-generation models reportedly have a higher climate sensitivity than previously, in part due to improved representation of cloud feedbacks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.97"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e6781">The results presented here indicate that although the loss of coral-reef-derived DMS may have small impacts on nucleation- and Aitken-mode aerosol, the end result is not as straightforward as the aerosol effect theory suggests. This complexity is highlighted by the difference between the nudged simulations and the free ensemble, where in the latter, the impact of changing meteorology in response to a weak direct effect has subsequent impacts on the radiation budget often opposing what was expected. These results also demonstrate how interdependent this system is and suggests that not explicitly resolving all aspects of the DMS–climate cycle (chemistry, aerosol, dynamics, clouds, radiation, etc.) may result in misleading findings. These results further highlight the costs and benefits of the two modelling methods (free versus nudged simulation) when trying to separate climate responses from climate variability.</p>
      <p id="d1e6785">This has been the first study to include coral-reef-derived DMS in a global climate–chemistry model and to then determine what possible effect the loss of this DMS source may have on climate. It is noted that the amount of DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> assumed to be produced by coral reefs in this work (an area weighted 50 nm) is likely larger than reality due to area averaging and the far more variable nature of DMS production. That said, no robust evidence of indirect effects and weak evidence of a direct effect over just one season (SON) has been found over the MC-Aus region. These results suggest that with smaller estimates of coral reef DMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, little to no climatic forcing would be found. These results have significant implications for current coral–DMS–climate literature, effectively signalling that DMS produced by coral reefs has little importance for climate via sulfate aerosol radiative forcing. However, we note that we have not evaluated other coral reef links to the climate such as carbon uptake or ecosystem services. A future study, including simulations conducted with short (hourly) timescales, is planned to evaluate if coral-reef-derived DMS can have a local impact on meteorology, in order to assess the possibility of a bioregulatory feedback system.</p>
      <p id="d1e6806">Reflecting on the questions posed at the beginning of this study, we are now able to provide the first quantitative evidence that coral reefs likely play little role in regional climate modulation. As coral reefs globally face extinction due to anthropogenic climate change, it is unlikely that the subsequent reduction in precursor aerosols will have a noticeable impact on regional climate. Further modelling studies using future climate scenarios where anthropogenic aerosol<?pagebreak page5900?> dominate are unlikely to yield different results by the same reasoning. A more interesting question may be what the change in climate would be in a pre-industrial world, with no anthropogenic greenhouse gases and in particular, aerosol pollution. We speculate that under pre-industrial conditions coral reefs could possibly have a greater influence on climate.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6813">The model used for this study is a licensed product of the UK Met Office and is available to specific users under a license agreement. Model simulation output can be made available upon request. Analysis of model output (plotting and statistical analysis) was performed using Python 2.7, and the code can be made available upon request for analysis.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6819">SLF completed the model simulations, analysis and write-up presented in this study. MTW provided project guidance, specific model set-up and analysis advice and contributed to the subsequent revisions of this work. RS and TPL provided project guidance and analysis advice and provided comment on the revisions of this paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6825">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6831">Sonya L. Fiddes was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (CE110001028). Todd P. Lane is supported by the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes (CE170100023). Sonya L. Fiddes and Robyn Schofield were supported by the ARC Discovery Project: Great Barrier Reef as a significant source of climatically relevant aerosol particles (DP150101649), and Robyn Schofield has funding from the ARC Discovery project: Tackling Atmospheric Chemistry Grand Challenges in the Southern Hemisphere (DP160101598). This research was undertaken with the assistance of resources and services from the National Computational Infrastructure (project q90 and w40), which is supported by the Australian Government. Sonya L. Fiddes was supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Sonya L. Fiddes would like to thank Georgina Harmer for her help in the design of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>.</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-5mm}}?><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6839">This research has been supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (grant no. CE110001028), the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for  Climate Extremes (grant no. CE170100023), the ARC Discovery Project: Great Barrier Reef as a significant source of climatically relevant aerosol particles (grant no. DP150101649) and the ARC Discovery project: Tackling Atmospheric Chemistry Grand Challenges in the Southern Hemisphere (grant no. DP160101598).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6845">This paper was edited by Susannah Burrows and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bell et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Bell et al.(2017)</label><?label Bell2017?><mixed-citation>Bell, T. G., Landwehr, S., Miller, S. D., de Bruyn, W. J., Callaghan, A. H., Scanlon, B., Ward, B., Yang, M., and Saltzman, E. S.: Estimation of bubble-mediated air–sea gas exchange from concurrent DMS and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocities at intermediate–high wind speeds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9019–9033, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9019-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-9019-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Belviso et~al.(2004)}}?><label>Belviso et al.(2004)</label><?label Belviso2004?><mixed-citation>Belviso, S., Moulin, C., Bopp, L., and Stefels, J.: Assessment of a global
climatology of oceanic dimethylsulfide (DMS) concentration based on SeaWiFS
imagery (1998–2001), Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 61,
804–816, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/F04-001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/F04-001</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Binkowski and Shankar(1995)}}?><label>Binkowski and Shankar(1995)</label><?label Binkowski1995?><mixed-citation>Binkowski, F. S. and Shankar, U.: The Regional Particulate Matter Model: 1.
Model description and preliminary results, J. Geophys. Res.,
100, 26191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD02093</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bopp et~al.(2004)}}?><label>Bopp et al.(2004)</label><?label Bopp2004?><mixed-citation>Bopp, L., Boucher, O., Aumont, O., Belviso, S., Dufresne, J.-L., Pham, M., and
Monfray, P.: Will marine dimethylsulfide emissions amplify or alleviate
global warming? A model study, Can. J. Fish. Aquat.
Sci., 61, 826–835, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/f04-045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/f04-045</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Broadbent and Jones(2004)}}?><label>Broadbent and Jones(2004)</label><?label Broadbent2004?><mixed-citation>Broadbent, A. D. and Jones, G. B.: DMS and DMSP in mucus ropes, coral mucus,
surface films and sediment pore waters from coral reefs in the Great Barrier
Reef, Mar. Freshwater Res., 55, 849–855, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/MF04114</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Broadbent et~al.(2002)}}?><label>Broadbent et al.(2002)</label><?label Broadbent2002?><mixed-citation>Broadbent, A. D., Jones, G. B., and Jones, R. J.: DMSP in Corals and Benthic
Algae from the Great Barrier Reef, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 55,
547–555, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2002.1021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1006/ecss.2002.1021</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Burdett et~al.(2015)}}?><label>Burdett et al.(2015)</label><?label Burdett2015?><mixed-citation>Burdett, H. L., Hatton, A. D., and Kamenos, N. A.: Coralline algae as a
globally significant pool of marine dimethylated sulfur, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 1845–1853, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005274" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GB005274</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cameron-Smith et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Cameron-Smith et al.(2011)</label><?label Cameron-Smith2011?><mixed-citation>Cameron-Smith, P., Elliott, S., Maltrud, M., Erickson, D., and Wingenter, O.:
Changes in dimethyl sulfide oceanic distribution due to climate change,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047069</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Charlson et~al.(1987)}}?><label>Charlson et al.(1987)</label><?label Charlson1987?><mixed-citation>Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., and Warren, S. G.: Oceanic
phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate, Nature, 326,
655–661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/326655a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/326655a0</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cropp et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Cropp et al.(2018)</label><?label Cropp2018?><mixed-citation>Cropp, R., Gabric, A., van Tran, D., Jones, G., Swan, H., and Butler, H.:
Coral reef aerosol emissions in response to irradiance stress in the Great
Barrier Reef, Australia, Ambio, 47, 671–681, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1018-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13280-018-1018-y</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dee et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Dee et al.(2011)</label><?label Dee2011?><mixed-citation>Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P.,
Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C.,
Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B.,
Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler,
M., Matricardi, M., Mcnally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J. J.,
Park, B. K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J. N.,
and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of
the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 137, 553–597, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.828</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Deloitte Access Economics}(2017)}}?><label>Deloitte Access Economics(2017)</label><?label DelloitteAccessEconomics2017?><mixed-citation>Deloitte Access Economics: The economic, social and icon value of the Great Barrier Reef Acknowledgement, Tech. rep., Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu,
Brisbane, QLD, Australia, available at: <uri>https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/economics/articles/great-barrier-reef.html</uri>, last access: 28 June 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Deschaseaux et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Deschaseaux et al.(2012)</label><?label Deschaseaux2012?><mixed-citation>
Deschaseaux, E., Jones, G. B., Miljevic, B., Ristovski, Z., and Swan, H.: Can corals form aerosol particles through volatile sulphur compound emissions?, in: Proceedings of the 12th International Coral Reef Symposium, edited by: Yellowlees, D. and Hughes, T., James Cook University, 9–13 July 2012, Cairns, QLD, Australia, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Edwards et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Edwards et al.(2013)</label><?label Edwards2013?><mixed-citation>
Edwards, J. M., Manners, J., Thelen, J.-C., Ingram, W. J., and Hill, P. G.:
Unified Model Documentation Paper No. 23: The Radiation Code, Tech. Rep.
Model version 8.2, UK Met Office, Exeter, UK, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Elliott(2009)}}?><label>Elliott(2009)</label><?label Elliott2009?><mixed-citation>Elliott, S.: Dependence of DMS global sea-air flux distribution on transfer
velocity and concentration field type, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 114, 1–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JG000710</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fan et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Fan et al.(2016)</label><?label Fan2016?><mixed-citation>Fan, J., Wang, Y., Rosenfeld, D., and Liu, X.: Review of aerosol-cloud
interactions: Mechanisms, significance, and challenges, J.
Atmos. Sci., 73, 4221–4252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0037.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-16-0037.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fan et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Fan et al.(2018)</label><?label Fan2018?><mixed-citation>Fan, J., Rosenfeld, D., Zhang, Y., Giangrande, S. E., Li, Z., Machado, L. A.,
Martin, S. T., Yang, Y., Wang, J., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M., Braga, R. C.,
Comstock, J. M., Feng, Z., Gao, W., Gomes, H. B., Mei, F., Pöhlker, C.,
Pöhlker, M. L., Pöschl, U., and De Souza, R. A.: Substantial
convection and precipitation enhancements by ultrafine aerosol particles,
Science, 359, 411–418, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aan8461</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fiddes et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Fiddes et al.(2018)</label><?label Fiddes2017c?><mixed-citation>Fiddes, S. L., Woodhouse, M. T., Nicholls, Z., Lane, T. P., and Schofield, R.: Cloud, precipitation and radiation responses to large perturbations in global dimethyl sulfide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10177–10198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10177-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-10177-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fischer and Jones(2012)}}?><label>Fischer and Jones(2012)</label><?label Fischer2012?><mixed-citation>Fischer, E. and Jones, G. B.: Atmospheric dimethysulphide production from
corals in the Great Barrier Reef and links to solar radiation, climate and
coral bleaching, Biogeochemistry, 110, 31–46,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9719-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-012-9719-y</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fuchs and Sutugin(1971)}}?><label>Fuchs and Sutugin(1971)</label><?label Fuchs1971?><mixed-citation>
Fuchs, N. and Sutugin, A.: Highly dispersed aerosols, in: Topics in Current
Aerosol Research, US Army Foreign Science and Technology Centre,
New York, USA, 1–86, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gabric et~al.(2004)}}?><label>Gabric et al.(2004)</label><?label Gabric2004?><mixed-citation>Gabric, A. J., Simó, R., Cropp, R. A., Hirst, A. C., and Dachs, J.:
Modeling estimates of the global emission of dimethylsulfide under enhanced
greenhouse conditions, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB2014,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002183" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GB002183</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gabric et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Gabric et al.(2013)</label><?label Gabric2013?><mixed-citation>Gabric, A. J., Qu, B., Rotstayn, L., and Shephard, J.: Global simulations of the impact on contemporary climate of a perturbation to the sea-to-air flux of dimethylsulfide, Aust. Meteorol. Ocean., 63,
365–376, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.22499/2.6303.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.22499/2.6303.002</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Grandey and Wang(2015)}}?><label>Grandey and Wang(2015)</label><?label Grandey2015?><mixed-citation>Grandey, B. S. and Wang, C.: Enhanced marine sulphur emissions offset global
warming and impact rainfall., Sci. Rep., 5, 13055,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep13055</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Green and Hatton(2014)}}?><label>Green and Hatton(2014)</label><?label Green2014?><mixed-citation>Green, T. K. and Hatton, A. D.: The Claw Hypothesis: A New Perspective on the Role of Biogenic Sulphur in the Regulation of Global Climate, Oceanogr. Mar. Biol., 52, 315–336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b17143-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/b17143-7</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hoegh-Guldberg et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Hoegh-Guldberg et al.(2017)</label><?label Hoegh-Guldberg2017?><mixed-citation>Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Poloczanska, E. S., Skirving, W., and Dove, S.: Coral Reef Ecosystems under Climate Change and Ocean Acidification, Front. Mar. Sci., 4, 158, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00158" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2017.00158</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hopkins et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Hopkins et al.(2016)</label><?label Hopkins2016?><mixed-citation>Hopkins, F. E., Bell, T. G., Yang, M., Suggett, D. J., and Steinke, M.: Air
exposure of coral is a significant source of dimethylsulfide (DMS) to the
atmosphere, Sci. Rep., 6, 36031, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep36031</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hughes et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Hughes et al.(2017)</label><?label Hughes2017?><mixed-citation>Hughes, T. P., Kerry, J. T., Alvarez-Noriega, M., Alvarez-Romero, J. G.,
Anderson, K. D., Baird, A. H., Babcock, R. C., Beger, M., Bellwood, D. R.,
Berkelmans, R., Bridge, T. C., Butler, I. R., Byrne, M., Cantin, N. E.,
Comeau, S., Connolly, S. R., Cumming, G. S., Dalton, S. J., Diaz-Pulido, G.,
Eakin, C. M., Figueira, W. F., Gilmour, J. P., Harrison, H. B., Heron, S. F.,
Hoey, A. S., Hobbs, J.-P. A., Hoogenboom, M. O., Kennedy, E. V., Kuo, C.-Y.,
Lough, J. M., Lowe, R. J., Liu, G., McCulloch, M. T., Malcolm, H. A.,
McWilliam, M. J., Pandolfi, J. M., Pears, R. J., Pratchett, M. S., Schoepf,
V., Simpson, T., Skirving, W. J., Sommer, B., Torda, G., Wachenfeld, D. R.,
Willis, B. L., and Wilson, S. K.: Global warming and recurrent mass
bleaching of corals, Nature, 543, 373–377, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21707" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature21707</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hughes et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Hughes et al.(2018)</label><?label Hughes2018?><mixed-citation>Hughes, T. P., Anderson, K. D., Connolly, S. R., Heron, S. F., Kerry, J. T.,
Lough, J. M., Baird, A. H., Baum, J. K., Berumen, M. L., Bridge, T. C.,
Claar, D. C., Eakin, C. M., Gilmour, J. P., Graham, N. A., Harrison, H.,
Hobbs, J. P. A., Hoey, A. S., Hoogenboom, M., Lowe, R. J., McCulloch, M. T.,
Pandolfi, J. M., Pratchett, M., Schoepf, V., Torda, G., and Wilson, S. K.:
Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the
Anthropocene, Science, 359, 80–83, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aan8048</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{IPCC}(2018)}}?><label>IPCC(2018)</label><?label Allen2018?><mixed-citation>IPCC: Summary for Policy Makers, in: Global Warming of 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission
pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat
of climate change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner,
H.-O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P., Pirani, A., Moufouma-Okia, W.,
C. Péan, R. P., Connors, S., Matthews, J., Chen, Y., Zhou, X., Gomis,
M., Lonnoy, E., Maycock, T., Tignor, M., and Waterfield, T., World
Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 32, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jackson et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Jackson et al.(2018)</label><?label Jackson2018?><mixed-citation>Jackson, R. L., Gabric, A., and Cropp, R.: Effects of ocean warming and coral bleaching on aerosol emissions in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia,
Sci. Rep., 8, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32470-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-32470-7</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jackson et~al.(2020a)}}?><label>Jackson et al.(2020a)</label><?label Jackson2020a?><mixed-citation>Jackson, R. L., Gabric, A. J., Cropp, R., and Woodhouse, M. T.: Dimethylsulfide (DMS), marine biogenic aerosols and the ecophysiology of coral reefs, Biogeosciences, 17, 2181–2204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2181-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-17-2181-2020</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jackson et~al.(2020b)}}?><label>Jackson et al.(2020b)</label><?label Jackson2020?><mixed-citation>Jackson, R. L., Gabric, A. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Swan, H. B., Jones, G. B.,
Cropp, R., and Deschaseaux, E. S.: Coral Reef Emissions of Atmospheric
Dimethylsulfide and the Influence on Marine Aerosols in the Southern Great
Barrier Reef, Australia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031837,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031837" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031837</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jones(2013)}}?><label>Jones(2013)</label><?label Jones2013?><mixed-citation>Jones, G. B.: Coral animals combat stress with sulphur, Nature, 502,
634–635, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12698" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12698</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jones and Trevena(2005)}}?><label>Jones and Trevena(2005)</label><?label Jones2005?><mixed-citation>Jones, G. B. and Trevena, A. J.: The influence of coral reefs on atmospheric
dimethylsulphide over the Great Barrier Reef, Coral Sea, Gulf of Papua and
Solomon and Bismarck Seas, Mar. Freshwater Res., 56, 85–93,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04097" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/MF04097</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jones et~al.(2007)}}?><label>Jones et al.(2007)</label><?label Jones2007?><mixed-citation>Jones, G. B., Curran, M., Broadbent, A., King, S., Fischer, E., and Jones,
R. J.: Factors affecting the cycling of dimethylsulfide and
dimethylsulfoniopropionate in coral reef waters of the great barrier reef,
Environ. Chem., 4, 310–322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN06065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EN06065</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5902?><ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jones et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Jones et al.(2017)</label><?label Jones2017?><mixed-citation>Jones, G. B., Curran, M., Swan, H., and Deschaseaux, E.: Dimethylsulfide and
Coral Bleaching: Links to Solar Radiation, Low Level Cloud and the Regulation
of Seawater Temperatures and Climate in the Great Barrier Reef, American
Journal of Climate Change, 6, 328–359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2017.62017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4236/ajcc.2017.62017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jones et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Jones et al.(2018)</label><?label Jones2018?><mixed-citation>Jones, G. B., Curran, M., Deschaseaux, E., Omori, Y., Tanimoto, H., Swan, H.,
Eyre, B., Ivey, J., McParland, E., Gabric, A., and Cropp, R.: The flux and
emission of dimethylsulfide from the Great Barrier Reef region and potential
influence on the climate of NE Australia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 13835–13856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029210</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kettle and Andreae(2000)}}?><label>Kettle and Andreae(2000)</label><?label Kettle2000?><mixed-citation>Kettle, A. J. and Andreae, M.: Flux of dimethylsulfide from the oceans : A
comparison of updated data sets and flux models,
J. Geophys. Res., 105, 26793–26808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900252" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900252</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kettle et~al.(1999)}}?><label>Kettle et al.(1999)</label><?label Kettle1999?><mixed-citation>
Kettle, A. J., Amouroux, D., Andreae, T. W., Bates, T. S., Berresheim, H.,
Bingemer, H., Boniforti, R., Helas, G., Leck, C., Maspero, M., Matrai, P.,
McTaggart, A. R., Mihalopoulos, N., Nguyen, B. C., Novo, A., Putaud, J. P.,
Rapsomanikis, S., Roberts, G., Schebeske, G., Sharma, S., Simó, R.,
Staubes, R., Turner, S., and Uher, G.: A global data base of sea surface
dimethyl sulfide (DMS) measurements and a simple model to predict sea surface
DMS as a function of latitude, longitude, and month, Global Biogeochem.
Cycles, 13, 399–444, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{King et~al.(2017)}}?><label>King et al.(2017)</label><?label King2017?><mixed-citation>King, A. D., Karoly, D. J., and Henley, B. J.: Australian climate extremes at 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C of global warming, Nat. Clim.
Change, 7, 412–416, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate3296</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kloster et~al.(2007)}}?><label>Kloster et al.(2007)</label><?label Kloster2007?><mixed-citation>Kloster, S., Six, K. D., Feichter, J., Maier-Reimer, E., Roeckner, E., Wetzel, P., Stier, P., and Esch, M.: Response of dimethylsulfide (DMS) in the ocean
and atmosphere to global warming, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 112, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JG000224</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kulmala et~al.(1998)}}?><label>Kulmala et al.(1998)</label><?label Kulmala1998?><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., and Pirjola, L.: Parameterizations for sulfuric
acid/water nucleation rates, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 8301,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03718" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD03718</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lamarque et~al.(2010)}}?><label>Lamarque et al.(2010)</label><?label Lamarque2010?><mixed-citation>Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z., Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D., Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M., Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lana et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Lana et al.(2011)</label><?label Lana2011?><mixed-citation>Lana, A., Bell, T. G., Simó, R., Vallina, S. M., Ballabrera-Poy, J.,
Kettle, A. J., Dachs, J., Bopp, L., Saltzman, E. S., Stefels, J., Johnson,
J. E., and Liss, P. S.: An updated climatology of surface dimethlysulfide
concentrations and emission fluxes in the global ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 25, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003850" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003850</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Leahy et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Leahy et al.(2013)</label><?label Leahy2013?><mixed-citation>Leahy, S. M., Kingsford, M. J., and Steinberg, C. R.: Do Clouds Save the Great Barrier Reef? Satellite Imagery Elucidates the Cloud-SST Relationship at the Local Scale, PLoS ONE, 8, e70400, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070400" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0070400</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liss and Merlivat(1986)}}?><label>Liss and Merlivat(1986)</label><?label Liss1986?><mixed-citation>Liss, P. S. and Merlivat, L.: Air-Sea Gas Exchange Rates: Introduction and
Synthesis, in: The Role of Air-Sea Exchange in Geochemical Cycling, edited
by Buat-Ménard, P., pp. 113–127, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, the Netherlands,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4738-2_5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-009-4738-2_5</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Magnan et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Magnan et al.(2016)</label><?label Magnan2016?><mixed-citation>Magnan, A. K., Colombier, M., Billé, R., Joos, F., Hoegh-Guldberg, O.,
Pörtner, H.-O., Waisman, H., Spencer, T., and Gattuso, J.-P.:
Implications of the Paris agreement for the ocean, Nat. Clim. Change,
6, 732–735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate3038</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mahajan et~al.(2015)}}?><label>Mahajan et al.(2015)</label><?label Mahajan2015?><mixed-citation>Mahajan, A. S., Fadnavis, S., Thomas, M. a., Pozzoli, L., Gupta, S., Royer,
S.-j., Saiz-Lopez, A., and Simó, R.: Quantifying the impacts of an
updated global dimethyl sulfide climatology on cloud microphysics and aerosol
radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
2524–2536, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022687" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022687</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mann et~al.(2010)}}?><label>Mann et al.(2010)</label><?label Mann2010?><mixed-citation>Mann, G. W., Carslaw, K. S., Spracklen, D. V., Ridley, D. A., Manktelow, P. T., Chipperfield, M. P., Pickering, S. J., and Johnson, C. E.: Description and evaluation of GLOMAP-mode: a modal global aerosol microphysics model for the UKCA composition-climate model, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 519–551, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-519-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-519-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mann et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Mann et al.(2012)</label><?label Mann2012?><mixed-citation>Mann, G. W., Carslaw, K. S., Ridley, D. A., Spracklen, D. V., Pringle, K. J., Merikanto, J., Korhonen, H., Schwarz, J. P., Lee, L. A., Manktelow, P. T., Woodhouse, M. T., Schmidt, A., Breider, T. J., Emmerson, K. M., Reddington, C. L., Chipperfield, M. P., and Pickering, S. J.: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol microphysics representations within the same 3-D global chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4449–4476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4449-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4449-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Metzger et~al.(2010)}}?><label>Metzger et al.(2010)</label><?label Metzger2010?><mixed-citation>Metzger, A., Verheggen, B., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Prevot, A. S. H.,
Weingartner, E., Riipinen, I., Kulmala, M., Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S.,
and Baltensperger, U.: Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol particle
formation under atmospheric conditions., P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6646–6651,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0911330107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Modini et~al.(2009)}}?><label>Modini et al.(2009)</label><?label Modini2009?><mixed-citation>Modini, R. L., Ristovski, Z. D., Johnson, G. R., He, C., Surawski, N., Morawska, L., Suni, T., and Kulmala, M.: New particle formation and growth at a remote, sub-tropical coastal location, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7607–7621, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7607-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7607-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nishant et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Nishant et al.(2019)</label><?label Nishant2019Aerosol-inducedRadiation?><mixed-citation>Nishant, N., Sherwood, S. C., and Geoffroy, O.: Aerosol-induced modification
of organised convection and top-of-atmosphere radiation, npj Climate and
Atmospheric Science, 2, 33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0089-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-019-0089-1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pham et~al.(1995)}}?><label>Pham et al.(1995)</label><?label Pham1995ACycle?><mixed-citation>Pham, M., Muller, J. F., Brasseur, G. P., Granier, C., and Megie, G.: A
three-dimensional study of the tropospheric sulfur cycle, J.
Geophys. Res., 100, 26061–26092, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd02095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95jd02095</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Plaisance et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Plaisance et al.(2011)</label><?label Plaisance2011?><mixed-citation>Plaisance, L., Caley, M. J., Brainard, R. E., and Knowlton, N.: The Diversity of Coral Reefs: What Are We Missing?, PLoS ONE, 6, e25026,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0025026</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Quinn and Bates(2011)}}?><label>Quinn and Bates(2011)</label><?label Quinn2011?><mixed-citation>Quinn, P. K. and Bates, T. S.: The case against climate regulation via oceanic
phytoplankton sulphur emissions, Nature, 480, 51–56,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10580" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature10580</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schwinger et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Schwinger et al.(2017)</label><?label Schwinger2017?><mixed-citation>Schwinger, J., Tjiputra, J., Goris, N., Six, K. D., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., Heinze, C., and Ilyina, T.: Amplification of global warming through pH dependence of DMS production simulated with a fully coupled Earth system model, Biogeosciences, 14, 3633–3648, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3633-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-14-3633-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Seinfeld and Pandis(1998)}}?><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(1998)</label><?label Seinfeld1998?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, 1st edn., Wiley, New York, USA, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5903?><ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sheng et~al.(2015)}}?><label>Sheng et al.(2015)</label><?label Sheng2015?><mixed-citation>Sheng, J. X., Weisenstein, D. K., Luo, B. P., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Anet,
J., Bingemer, H., and Peter, T.: Global atmospheric sulfur budget under
volcanically quiescent conditions: Aerosol-chemistry-climate model
predictions and validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
120, 256–276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021985" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021985</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Six et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Six et al.(2013)</label><?label Six2013?><mixed-citation>Six, K. D., Kloster, S., Ilyina, T., Archer, S. D., Zhang, K., and
Maier-Reimer, E.: Global warming amplified by reduced sulphur fluxes as a
result of ocean acidification, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 975–978,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate1981</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Slinn(1982)}}?><label>Slinn(1982)</label><?label Slinn1982?><mixed-citation>Slinn, W. G.: Predictions for particle deposition to vegetative canopies,
Atmos. Environ., 16, 1785–1794,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90271-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(82)90271-2</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Spalding et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Spalding et al.(2017)</label><?label Spalding2017?><mixed-citation>Spalding, M., Burke, L., Wood, S. A., Ashpole, J., Hutchison, J., and
zu Ermgassen, P.: Mapping the global value and distribution of coral reef
tourism, Mar. Policy, 82, 104–113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.014</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Spracklen et~al.(2005)}}?><label>Spracklen et al.(2005)</label><?label Spracklen2005?><mixed-citation>Spracklen, D. V., Pringle, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Chipperfield, M. P., and Mann, G. W.: A global off-line model of size-resolved aerosol microphysics: II. Identification of key uncertainties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3233–3250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3233-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-3233-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Swan et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Swan et al.(2012)</label><?label Swan2012?><mixed-citation>
Swan, H. B., Jones, G. B., and Deschaseaux, E.: Dimethylsulfide, Climate and
Coral Reef Ecosystems, in: Proceedings of the 12th International Coral Reef
Symposium, edited by: Yellowlees, D. and Hughes, T. P., James Cook University, 9–13 July 2012, Cairns, QLD, Australia, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Swan et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Swan et al.(2017)</label><?label Swan2017?><mixed-citation>Swan, H. B., Jones, G. B., Deschaseaux, E. S. M., and Eyre, B. D.: Coral reef origins of atmospheric dimethylsulfide at Heron Island, southern Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Biogeosciences, 14, 229–239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-229-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-14-229-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tao et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Tao et al.(2012)</label><?label Tao2012?><mixed-citation>Tao, W. K., Chen, J.-P., Li, Z., Wang, C., and Zhang, C.: Impact of Aerosols
on boundary layer clouds and precipitation, Rev. Geophys., 50,
2011RG000369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000369" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011RG000369</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Taylor et~al.(2015)}}?><label>Taylor et al.(2015)</label><?label Taylor2015?><mixed-citation>Taylor, K. E., Williamson, D., and Zwiers, F. W.: AMIP Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Concentration Boundary Conditions, Program for Climate Model Diagnosis &amp; Intercomparison, available at: <uri>https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/amip/details/</uri> (last access: 16 April 2021), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tesdal et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Tesdal et al.(2016)</label><?label Tesdal2016?><mixed-citation>Tesdal, J.-E., Christian, J. R., Monahan, A. H., and von Salzen, K.: Sensitivity of modelled sulfate aerosol and its radiative effect on climate to ocean DMS concentration and air–sea flux, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10847–10864, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10847-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10847-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Thomas et~al.(2010)}}?><label>Thomas et al.(2010)</label><?label Thomas2010?><mixed-citation>Thomas, M. A., Suntharalingam, P., Pozzoli, L., Rast, S., Devasthale, A., Kloster, S., Feichter, J., and Lenton, T. M.: Quantification of DMS aerosol-cloud-climate interactions using the ECHAM5-HAMMOZ model in a current climate scenario, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7425–7438, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7425-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7425-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Thomas et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Thomas et al.(2011)</label><?label Thomas2011?><mixed-citation>Thomas, M. A., Suntharalingam, P., Pozzoli, L., Devasthale, A., Kloster, S., Rast, S., Feichter, J., and Lenton, T. M.: Rate of non-linearity in DMS aerosol-cloud-climate interactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11175–11183, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11175-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11175-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{UNEP-WCMC} et~al.(2010)}}?><label>UNEP-WCMC et al.(2010)</label><?label UNEP-WCMC2010?><mixed-citation>
UNEP-WCMC, WorldFish Centre, WRI, and TNC: Global distribution of
coral reefs, compiled from multiple sources including the Millennium Coral
Reef Mapping Project. Version 1.3. Includes contributions from IMaRS-USF and
IRD (2005), IMaRS- USF (2005) and Spalding et al. (2001)., Tech. rep., UNEP
World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{van~der Werf et~al.(2017)}}?><label>van der Werf et al.(2017)</label><?label vanderWerf2017?><mixed-citation>van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., van Leeuwen, T. T., Chen, Y., Rogers, B. M., Mu, M., van Marle, M. J. E., Morton, D. C., Collatz, G. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.: Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 697–720, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-9-697-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{van Vuuren et~al.(2011)}}?><label>van Vuuren et al.(2011)</label><?label VanVuuren2011?><mixed-citation>van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard,
K., Hurtt, G. C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J. F., Masui, T.,
Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., Smith, S. J., and Rose, S. K.: The
representative concentration pathways: An overview, Climatic Change, 109,
5–31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vincent et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Vincent et al.(2011)</label><?label Vincent2011?><mixed-citation>Vincent, E. M., Lengaigne, M., Menkes, C. E., Jourdain, N. C., Marchesiello,
P., and Madec, G.: Interannual variability of the South Pacific Convergence
Zone and implications for tropical cyclone genesis, Clim. Dynam., 36,
1881–1896, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0716-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-009-0716-3</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vlahos and Monahan(2009)}}?><label>Vlahos and Monahan(2009)</label><?label Vlahos2009?><mixed-citation>Vlahos, P. and Monahan, E. C.: A generalized model for the air-sea transfer of dimethyl sulfide at high wind speeds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36,
L21605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040695" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL040695</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Walters et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Walters et al.(2014)</label><?label Walters2014?><mixed-citation>Walters, D. N., Williams, K. D., Boutle, I. A., Bushell, A. C., Edwards, J. M., Field, P. R., Lock, A. P., Morcrette, C. J., Stratton, R. A., Wilkinson, J. M., Willett, M. R., Bellouin, N., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Brooks, M. E., Copsey, D., Earnshaw, P. D., Hardiman, S. C., Harris, C. M., Levine, R. C., MacLachlan, C., Manners, J. C., Martin, G. M., Milton, S. F., Palmer, M. D., Roberts, M. J., Rodríguez, J. M., Tennant, W. J., and Vidale, P. L.: The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 4.0 and JULES Global Land 4.0 configurations, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 361–386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-361-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-361-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wilks(2011)}}?><label>Wilks(2011)</label><?label Wilks2011?><mixed-citation>Wilks, D. S.: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, Elsevier, 3rd edn., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385022-5.00026-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-12-385022-5.00026-9</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Woodhouse et~al.(2010)}}?><label>Woodhouse et al.(2010)</label><?label Woodhouse2010?><mixed-citation>Woodhouse, M. T., Carslaw, K. S., Mann, G. W., Vallina, S. M., Vogt, M., Halloran, P. R., and Boucher, O.: Low sensitivity of cloud condensation nuclei to changes in the sea-air flux of dimethyl-sulphide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7545–7559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7545-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7545-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Woodhouse et~al.(2015)}}?><label>Woodhouse et al.(2015)</label><?label Woodhouse2015?><mixed-citation>
Woodhouse, M. T., Luhar, A. K., Stevens, L., Galbally, I., Thatcher, M., Uhe,
P., Noonan, J., and Molloy, S.: Australian reactive-gas emissions in a
global chemistry-climate model and initial results, Air Quality and Climate
Change, 49, 31–38, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yoch(2002)}}?><label>Yoch(2002)</label><?label Yoch2002?><mixed-citation>Yoch, D. C.: Dimethylsulfoniopropionate : Its Sources , Role in the Marine
Food Web , and Biological Degradation to Dimethylsulfide, Appl.
Environ. Microb., 68, 5804–5815,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.12.5804-5815.2002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1128/AEM.68.12.5804-5815.2002</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zelinka et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Zelinka et al.(2020)</label><?label Zelinka2020?><mixed-citation>Zelinka, M. D., Myers, T. A., McCoy, D. T., Po-Chedley, S., Caldwell, P. M.,
Ceppi, P., Klein, S. A., and Taylor, K. E.: Causes of Higher Climate
Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, 1–12,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL085782</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhang(2001)}}?><label>Zhang(2001)</label><?label Zhang2001?><mixed-citation>Zhang, L.: A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module, Atmos. Environ., 35, 549–560,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00326-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00326-5</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Coral-reef-derived dimethyl sulfide and the climatic impact of the loss of coral reefs</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is a naturally occurring aerosol precursor gas which plays an important role in the global sulfur budget, aerosol formation and climate. While DMS is produced predominantly by phytoplankton, recent observational literature has suggested that corals and their symbionts produce a comparable amount of DMS, which is unaccounted for in models. It has further been hypothesised that the coral reef source of DMS may modulate regional climate. This hypothesis presents a particular concern given the current threat to coral reefs under anthropogenic climate change. In this paper, a global climate model with online chemistry and aerosol is used to explore the influence of coral-reef-derived DMS on atmospheric composition and climate. A simple representation of coral-reef-derived DMS is developed and added to a common DMS surface water climatology, resulting in an additional flux of 0.3&thinsp;Tg&thinsp;yr<sup>−1</sup>&thinsp;S, or 1.7&thinsp;% of the global sulfur flux from DMS. By comparing the differences between both nudged and free-running ensemble simulations with and without coral-reef-derived DMS, the influence of coral-reef-derived DMS on regional climate is quantified. In the Maritime Continent–Australian region, where the highest density of coral reefs exists, a small decrease in nucleation- and Aitken-mode aerosol number concentration and mass is found when coral reef DMS emissions are removed from the system. However, these small responses are found to have no robust effect on regional climate via direct and indirect aerosol effects. This work emphasises the complexities of the aerosol–climate system, and the limitations of current modelling capabilities are highlighted, in particular surrounding convective responses to changes in aerosol. In conclusion, we find no robust evidence that coral-reef-derived DMS influences global and regional climate.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Bell et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Bell, T. G., Landwehr, S., Miller, S. D., de Bruyn, W. J., Callaghan, A. H., Scanlon, B., Ward, B., Yang, M., and Saltzman, E. S.: Estimation of bubble-mediated air–sea gas exchange from concurrent DMS and CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocities at intermediate–high wind speeds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9019–9033, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9019-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9019-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Belviso et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Belviso, S., Moulin, C., Bopp, L., and Stefels, J.: Assessment of a global
climatology of oceanic dimethylsulfide (DMS) concentration based on SeaWiFS
imagery (1998–2001), Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 61,
804–816, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/F04-001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/F04-001</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Binkowski and Shankar(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Binkowski, F. S. and Shankar, U.: The Regional Particulate Matter Model: 1.
Model description and preliminary results, J. Geophys. Res.,
100, 26191, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02093</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bopp et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Bopp, L., Boucher, O., Aumont, O., Belviso, S., Dufresne, J.-L., Pham, M., and
Monfray, P.: Will marine dimethylsulfide emissions amplify or alleviate
global warming? A model study, Can. J. Fish. Aquat.
Sci., 61, 826–835, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/f04-045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/f04-045</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Broadbent and Jones(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Broadbent, A. D. and Jones, G. B.: DMS and DMSP in mucus ropes, coral mucus,
surface films and sediment pore waters from coral reefs in the Great Barrier
Reef, Mar. Freshwater Res., 55, 849–855, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04114</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Broadbent et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Broadbent, A. D., Jones, G. B., and Jones, R. J.: DMSP in Corals and Benthic
Algae from the Great Barrier Reef, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 55,
547–555, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2002.1021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2002.1021</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Burdett et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Burdett, H. L., Hatton, A. D., and Kamenos, N. A.: Coralline algae as a
globally significant pool of marine dimethylated sulfur, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 1845–1853, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005274" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005274</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Cameron-Smith et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Cameron-Smith, P., Elliott, S., Maltrud, M., Erickson, D., and Wingenter, O.:
Changes in dimethyl sulfide oceanic distribution due to climate change,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047069</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Charlson et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., and Warren, S. G.: Oceanic
phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate, Nature, 326,
655–661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/326655a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/326655a0</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Cropp et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Cropp, R., Gabric, A., van Tran, D., Jones, G., Swan, H., and Butler, H.:
Coral reef aerosol emissions in response to irradiance stress in the Great
Barrier Reef, Australia, Ambio, 47, 671–681, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1018-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1018-y</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Dee et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P.,
Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C.,
Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B.,
Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler,
M., Matricardi, M., Mcnally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J. J.,
Park, B. K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J. N.,
and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of
the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 137, 553–597, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Deloitte Access Economics(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Deloitte Access Economics: The economic, social and icon value of the Great Barrier Reef Acknowledgement, Tech. rep., Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu,
Brisbane, QLD, Australia, available at: <a href="https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/economics/articles/great-barrier-reef.html" target="_blank"/>, last access: 28 June 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Deschaseaux et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Deschaseaux, E., Jones, G. B., Miljevic, B., Ristovski, Z., and Swan, H.: Can corals form aerosol particles through volatile sulphur compound emissions?, in: Proceedings of the 12th International Coral Reef Symposium, edited by: Yellowlees, D. and Hughes, T., James Cook University, 9–13 July 2012, Cairns, QLD, Australia, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Edwards et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Edwards, J. M., Manners, J., Thelen, J.-C., Ingram, W. J., and Hill, P. G.:
Unified Model Documentation Paper No. 23: The Radiation Code, Tech. Rep.
Model version 8.2, UK Met Office, Exeter, UK, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Elliott(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Elliott, S.: Dependence of DMS global sea-air flux distribution on transfer
velocity and concentration field type, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 114, 1–18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000710</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Fan et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, J., Wang, Y., Rosenfeld, D., and Liu, X.: Review of aerosol-cloud
interactions: Mechanisms, significance, and challenges, J.
Atmos. Sci., 73, 4221–4252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0037.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0037.1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Fan et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, J., Rosenfeld, D., Zhang, Y., Giangrande, S. E., Li, Z., Machado, L. A.,
Martin, S. T., Yang, Y., Wang, J., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M., Braga, R. C.,
Comstock, J. M., Feng, Z., Gao, W., Gomes, H. B., Mei, F., Pöhlker, C.,
Pöhlker, M. L., Pöschl, U., and De Souza, R. A.: Substantial
convection and precipitation enhancements by ultrafine aerosol particles,
Science, 359, 411–418, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8461" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8461</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Fiddes et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Fiddes, S. L., Woodhouse, M. T., Nicholls, Z., Lane, T. P., and Schofield, R.: Cloud, precipitation and radiation responses to large perturbations in global dimethyl sulfide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10177–10198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10177-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10177-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Fischer and Jones(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Fischer, E. and Jones, G. B.: Atmospheric dimethysulphide production from
corals in the Great Barrier Reef and links to solar radiation, climate and
coral bleaching, Biogeochemistry, 110, 31–46,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9719-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9719-y</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Fuchs and Sutugin(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
Fuchs, N. and Sutugin, A.: Highly dispersed aerosols, in: Topics in Current
Aerosol Research, US Army Foreign Science and Technology Centre,
New York, USA, 1–86, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Gabric et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Gabric, A. J., Simó, R., Cropp, R. A., Hirst, A. C., and Dachs, J.:
Modeling estimates of the global emission of dimethylsulfide under enhanced
greenhouse conditions, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB2014,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002183" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002183</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Gabric et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Gabric, A. J., Qu, B., Rotstayn, L., and Shephard, J.: Global simulations of the impact on contemporary climate of a perturbation to the sea-to-air flux of dimethylsulfide, Aust. Meteorol. Ocean., 63,
365–376, <a href="https://doi.org/10.22499/2.6303.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.22499/2.6303.002</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Grandey and Wang(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Grandey, B. S. and Wang, C.: Enhanced marine sulphur emissions offset global
warming and impact rainfall., Sci. Rep., 5, 13055,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13055</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Green and Hatton(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Green, T. K. and Hatton, A. D.: The Claw Hypothesis: A New Perspective on the Role of Biogenic Sulphur in the Regulation of Global Climate, Oceanogr. Mar. Biol., 52, 315–336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b17143-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1201/b17143-7</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hoegh-Guldberg et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Poloczanska, E. S., Skirving, W., and Dove, S.: Coral Reef Ecosystems under Climate Change and Ocean Acidification, Front. Mar. Sci., 4, 158, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00158" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00158</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hopkins et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Hopkins, F. E., Bell, T. G., Yang, M., Suggett, D. J., and Steinke, M.: Air
exposure of coral is a significant source of dimethylsulfide (DMS) to the
atmosphere, Sci. Rep., 6, 36031, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36031</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Hughes et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Hughes, T. P., Kerry, J. T., Alvarez-Noriega, M., Alvarez-Romero, J. G.,
Anderson, K. D., Baird, A. H., Babcock, R. C., Beger, M., Bellwood, D. R.,
Berkelmans, R., Bridge, T. C., Butler, I. R., Byrne, M., Cantin, N. E.,
Comeau, S., Connolly, S. R., Cumming, G. S., Dalton, S. J., Diaz-Pulido, G.,
Eakin, C. M., Figueira, W. F., Gilmour, J. P., Harrison, H. B., Heron, S. F.,
Hoey, A. S., Hobbs, J.-P. A., Hoogenboom, M. O., Kennedy, E. V., Kuo, C.-Y.,
Lough, J. M., Lowe, R. J., Liu, G., McCulloch, M. T., Malcolm, H. A.,
McWilliam, M. J., Pandolfi, J. M., Pears, R. J., Pratchett, M. S., Schoepf,
V., Simpson, T., Skirving, W. J., Sommer, B., Torda, G., Wachenfeld, D. R.,
Willis, B. L., and Wilson, S. K.: Global warming and recurrent mass
bleaching of corals, Nature, 543, 373–377, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21707" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21707</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Hughes et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Hughes, T. P., Anderson, K. D., Connolly, S. R., Heron, S. F., Kerry, J. T.,
Lough, J. M., Baird, A. H., Baum, J. K., Berumen, M. L., Bridge, T. C.,
Claar, D. C., Eakin, C. M., Gilmour, J. P., Graham, N. A., Harrison, H.,
Hobbs, J. P. A., Hoey, A. S., Hoogenboom, M., Lowe, R. J., McCulloch, M. T.,
Pandolfi, J. M., Pratchett, M., Schoepf, V., Torda, G., and Wilson, S. K.:
Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the
Anthropocene, Science, 359, 80–83, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8048</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>IPCC(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Summary for Policy Makers, in: Global Warming of 1.5&thinsp;°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5&thinsp;°C
above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission
pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat
of climate change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner,
H.-O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P., Pirani, A., Moufouma-Okia, W.,
C. Péan, R. P., Connors, S., Matthews, J., Chen, Y., Zhou, X., Gomis,
M., Lonnoy, E., Maycock, T., Tignor, M., and Waterfield, T., World
Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 32, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Jackson et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, R. L., Gabric, A., and Cropp, R.: Effects of ocean warming and coral bleaching on aerosol emissions in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia,
Sci. Rep., 8, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32470-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32470-7</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Jackson et al.(2020a)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, R. L., Gabric, A. J., Cropp, R., and Woodhouse, M. T.: Dimethylsulfide (DMS), marine biogenic aerosols and the ecophysiology of coral reefs, Biogeosciences, 17, 2181–2204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2181-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2181-2020</a>, 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Jackson et al.(2020b)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, R. L., Gabric, A. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Swan, H. B., Jones, G. B.,
Cropp, R., and Deschaseaux, E. S.: Coral Reef Emissions of Atmospheric
Dimethylsulfide and the Influence on Marine Aerosols in the Southern Great
Barrier Reef, Australia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031837,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031837" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031837</a>, 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Jones(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, G. B.: Coral animals combat stress with sulphur, Nature, 502,
634–635, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12698" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12698</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Jones and Trevena(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, G. B. and Trevena, A. J.: The influence of coral reefs on atmospheric
dimethylsulphide over the Great Barrier Reef, Coral Sea, Gulf of Papua and
Solomon and Bismarck Seas, Mar. Freshwater Res., 56, 85–93,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04097" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04097</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Jones et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, G. B., Curran, M., Broadbent, A., King, S., Fischer, E., and Jones,
R. J.: Factors affecting the cycling of dimethylsulfide and
dimethylsulfoniopropionate in coral reef waters of the great barrier reef,
Environ. Chem., 4, 310–322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN06065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/EN06065</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Jones et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, G. B., Curran, M., Swan, H., and Deschaseaux, E.: Dimethylsulfide and
Coral Bleaching: Links to Solar Radiation, Low Level Cloud and the Regulation
of Seawater Temperatures and Climate in the Great Barrier Reef, American
Journal of Climate Change, 6, 328–359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2017.62017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2017.62017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Jones et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, G. B., Curran, M., Deschaseaux, E., Omori, Y., Tanimoto, H., Swan, H.,
Eyre, B., Ivey, J., McParland, E., Gabric, A., and Cropp, R.: The flux and
emission of dimethylsulfide from the Great Barrier Reef region and potential
influence on the climate of NE Australia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 13835–13856, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029210" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029210</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Kettle and Andreae(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Kettle, A. J. and Andreae, M.: Flux of dimethylsulfide from the oceans : A
comparison of updated data sets and flux models,
J. Geophys. Res., 105, 26793–26808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900252" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900252</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Kettle et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Kettle, A. J., Amouroux, D., Andreae, T. W., Bates, T. S., Berresheim, H.,
Bingemer, H., Boniforti, R., Helas, G., Leck, C., Maspero, M., Matrai, P.,
McTaggart, A. R., Mihalopoulos, N., Nguyen, B. C., Novo, A., Putaud, J. P.,
Rapsomanikis, S., Roberts, G., Schebeske, G., Sharma, S., Simó, R.,
Staubes, R., Turner, S., and Uher, G.: A global data base of sea surface
dimethyl sulfide (DMS) measurements and a simple model to predict sea surface
DMS as a function of latitude, longitude, and month, Global Biogeochem.
Cycles, 13, 399–444, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>King et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
King, A. D., Karoly, D. J., and Henley, B. J.: Australian climate extremes at 1.5&thinsp;°C and 2&thinsp;°C of global warming, Nat. Clim.
Change, 7, 412–416, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3296</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Kloster et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Kloster, S., Six, K. D., Feichter, J., Maier-Reimer, E., Roeckner, E., Wetzel, P., Stier, P., and Esch, M.: Response of dimethylsulfide (DMS) in the ocean
and atmosphere to global warming, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 112, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000224" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000224</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Kulmala et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., and Pirjola, L.: Parameterizations for sulfuric
acid/water nucleation rates, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 8301,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03718" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03718</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Lamarque et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z., Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D., Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M., Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Lana et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Lana, A., Bell, T. G., Simó, R., Vallina, S. M., Ballabrera-Poy, J.,
Kettle, A. J., Dachs, J., Bopp, L., Saltzman, E. S., Stefels, J., Johnson,
J. E., and Liss, P. S.: An updated climatology of surface dimethlysulfide
concentrations and emission fluxes in the global ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 25, 1–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003850" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003850</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Leahy et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Leahy, S. M., Kingsford, M. J., and Steinberg, C. R.: Do Clouds Save the Great Barrier Reef? Satellite Imagery Elucidates the Cloud-SST Relationship at the Local Scale, PLoS ONE, 8, e70400, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070400" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070400</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Liss and Merlivat(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Liss, P. S. and Merlivat, L.: Air-Sea Gas Exchange Rates: Introduction and
Synthesis, in: The Role of Air-Sea Exchange in Geochemical Cycling, edited
by Buat-Ménard, P., pp. 113–127, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, the Netherlands,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4738-2_5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4738-2_5</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Magnan et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Magnan, A. K., Colombier, M., Billé, R., Joos, F., Hoegh-Guldberg, O.,
Pörtner, H.-O., Waisman, H., Spencer, T., and Gattuso, J.-P.:
Implications of the Paris agreement for the ocean, Nat. Clim. Change,
6, 732–735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3038</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Mahajan et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Mahajan, A. S., Fadnavis, S., Thomas, M. a., Pozzoli, L., Gupta, S., Royer,
S.-j., Saiz-Lopez, A., and Simó, R.: Quantifying the impacts of an
updated global dimethyl sulfide climatology on cloud microphysics and aerosol
radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
2524–2536, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022687" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022687</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Mann et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Mann, G. W., Carslaw, K. S., Spracklen, D. V., Ridley, D. A., Manktelow, P. T., Chipperfield, M. P., Pickering, S. J., and Johnson, C. E.: Description and evaluation of GLOMAP-mode: a modal global aerosol microphysics model for the UKCA composition-climate model, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 519–551, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-519-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-519-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Mann et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Mann, G. W., Carslaw, K. S., Ridley, D. A., Spracklen, D. V., Pringle, K. J., Merikanto, J., Korhonen, H., Schwarz, J. P., Lee, L. A., Manktelow, P. T., Woodhouse, M. T., Schmidt, A., Breider, T. J., Emmerson, K. M., Reddington, C. L., Chipperfield, M. P., and Pickering, S. J.: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol microphysics representations within the same 3-D global chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4449–4476, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4449-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4449-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Metzger et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Metzger, A., Verheggen, B., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Prevot, A. S. H.,
Weingartner, E., Riipinen, I., Kulmala, M., Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S.,
and Baltensperger, U.: Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol particle
formation under atmospheric conditions., P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6646–6651,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Modini et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Modini, R. L., Ristovski, Z. D., Johnson, G. R., He, C., Surawski, N., Morawska, L., Suni, T., and Kulmala, M.: New particle formation and growth at a remote, sub-tropical coastal location, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7607–7621, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7607-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7607-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Nishant et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Nishant, N., Sherwood, S. C., and Geoffroy, O.: Aerosol-induced modification
of organised convection and top-of-atmosphere radiation, npj Climate and
Atmospheric Science, 2, 33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0089-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0089-1</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Pham et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Pham, M., Muller, J. F., Brasseur, G. P., Granier, C., and Megie, G.: A
three-dimensional study of the tropospheric sulfur cycle, J.
Geophys. Res., 100, 26061–26092, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd02095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd02095</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Plaisance et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Plaisance, L., Caley, M. J., Brainard, R. E., and Knowlton, N.: The Diversity of Coral Reefs: What Are We Missing?, PLoS ONE, 6, e25026,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025026</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Quinn and Bates(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Quinn, P. K. and Bates, T. S.: The case against climate regulation via oceanic
phytoplankton sulphur emissions, Nature, 480, 51–56,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10580" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10580</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Schwinger et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwinger, J., Tjiputra, J., Goris, N., Six, K. D., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., Heinze, C., and Ilyina, T.: Amplification of global warming through pH dependence of DMS production simulated with a fully coupled Earth system model, Biogeosciences, 14, 3633–3648, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3633-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3633-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, 1st edn., Wiley, New York, USA, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Sheng et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Sheng, J. X., Weisenstein, D. K., Luo, B. P., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Anet,
J., Bingemer, H., and Peter, T.: Global atmospheric sulfur budget under
volcanically quiescent conditions: Aerosol-chemistry-climate model
predictions and validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
120, 256–276, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021985" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021985</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Six et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Six, K. D., Kloster, S., Ilyina, T., Archer, S. D., Zhang, K., and
Maier-Reimer, E.: Global warming amplified by reduced sulphur fluxes as a
result of ocean acidification, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 975–978,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1981</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Slinn(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Slinn, W. G.: Predictions for particle deposition to vegetative canopies,
Atmos. Environ., 16, 1785–1794,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90271-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90271-2</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Spalding et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Spalding, M., Burke, L., Wood, S. A., Ashpole, J., Hutchison, J., and
zu Ermgassen, P.: Mapping the global value and distribution of coral reef
tourism, Mar. Policy, 82, 104–113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.014</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Spracklen et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Spracklen, D. V., Pringle, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Chipperfield, M. P., and Mann, G. W.: A global off-line model of size-resolved aerosol microphysics: II. Identification of key uncertainties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3233–3250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3233-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3233-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Swan et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Swan, H. B., Jones, G. B., and Deschaseaux, E.: Dimethylsulfide, Climate and
Coral Reef Ecosystems, in: Proceedings of the 12th International Coral Reef
Symposium, edited by: Yellowlees, D. and Hughes, T. P., James Cook University, 9–13 July 2012, Cairns, QLD, Australia, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Swan et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Swan, H. B., Jones, G. B., Deschaseaux, E. S. M., and Eyre, B. D.: Coral reef origins of atmospheric dimethylsulfide at Heron Island, southern Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Biogeosciences, 14, 229–239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-229-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-229-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Tao et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, W. K., Chen, J.-P., Li, Z., Wang, C., and Zhang, C.: Impact of Aerosols
on boundary layer clouds and precipitation, Rev. Geophys., 50,
2011RG000369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000369" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000369</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Taylor et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, K. E., Williamson, D., and Zwiers, F. W.: AMIP Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Concentration Boundary Conditions, Program for Climate Model Diagnosis &amp; Intercomparison, available at: <a href="https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/amip/details/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 16 April 2021), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Tesdal et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Tesdal, J.-E., Christian, J. R., Monahan, A. H., and von Salzen, K.: Sensitivity of modelled sulfate aerosol and its radiative effect on climate to ocean DMS concentration and air–sea flux, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10847–10864, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10847-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10847-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Thomas et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, M. A., Suntharalingam, P., Pozzoli, L., Rast, S., Devasthale, A., Kloster, S., Feichter, J., and Lenton, T. M.: Quantification of DMS aerosol-cloud-climate interactions using the ECHAM5-HAMMOZ model in a current climate scenario, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7425–7438, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7425-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7425-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Thomas et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, M. A., Suntharalingam, P., Pozzoli, L., Devasthale, A., Kloster, S., Rast, S., Feichter, J., and Lenton, T. M.: Rate of non-linearity in DMS aerosol-cloud-climate interactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11175–11183, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11175-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11175-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>UNEP-WCMC et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
UNEP-WCMC, WorldFish Centre, WRI, and TNC: Global distribution of
coral reefs, compiled from multiple sources including the Millennium Coral
Reef Mapping Project. Version 1.3. Includes contributions from IMaRS-USF and
IRD (2005), IMaRS- USF (2005) and Spalding et al. (2001)., Tech. rep., UNEP
World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>van der Werf et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., van Leeuwen, T. T., Chen, Y., Rogers, B. M., Mu, M., van Marle, M. J. E., Morton, D. C., Collatz, G. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.: Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 697–720, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>van Vuuren et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard,
K., Hurtt, G. C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J. F., Masui, T.,
Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., Smith, S. J., and Rose, S. K.: The
representative concentration pathways: An overview, Climatic Change, 109,
5–31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Vincent et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Vincent, E. M., Lengaigne, M., Menkes, C. E., Jourdain, N. C., Marchesiello,
P., and Madec, G.: Interannual variability of the South Pacific Convergence
Zone and implications for tropical cyclone genesis, Clim. Dynam., 36,
1881–1896, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0716-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0716-3</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Vlahos and Monahan(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Vlahos, P. and Monahan, E. C.: A generalized model for the air-sea transfer of dimethyl sulfide at high wind speeds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36,
L21605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040695" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040695</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Walters et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Walters, D. N., Williams, K. D., Boutle, I. A., Bushell, A. C., Edwards, J. M., Field, P. R., Lock, A. P., Morcrette, C. J., Stratton, R. A., Wilkinson, J. M., Willett, M. R., Bellouin, N., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Brooks, M. E., Copsey, D., Earnshaw, P. D., Hardiman, S. C., Harris, C. M., Levine, R. C., MacLachlan, C., Manners, J. C., Martin, G. M., Milton, S. F., Palmer, M. D., Roberts, M. J., Rodríguez, J. M., Tennant, W. J., and Vidale, P. L.: The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 4.0 and JULES Global Land 4.0 configurations, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 361–386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-361-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-361-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Wilks(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Wilks, D. S.: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, Elsevier, 3rd edn., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385022-5.00026-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385022-5.00026-9</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Woodhouse et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Woodhouse, M. T., Carslaw, K. S., Mann, G. W., Vallina, S. M., Vogt, M., Halloran, P. R., and Boucher, O.: Low sensitivity of cloud condensation nuclei to changes in the sea-air flux of dimethyl-sulphide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7545–7559, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7545-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7545-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Woodhouse et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Woodhouse, M. T., Luhar, A. K., Stevens, L., Galbally, I., Thatcher, M., Uhe,
P., Noonan, J., and Molloy, S.: Australian reactive-gas emissions in a
global chemistry-climate model and initial results, Air Quality and Climate
Change, 49, 31–38, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Yoch(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Yoch, D. C.: Dimethylsulfoniopropionate : Its Sources , Role in the Marine
Food Web , and Biological Degradation to Dimethylsulfide, Appl.
Environ. Microb., 68, 5804–5815,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.12.5804-5815.2002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.12.5804-5815.2002</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Zelinka et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Zelinka, M. D., Myers, T. A., McCoy, D. T., Po-Chedley, S., Caldwell, P. M.,
Ceppi, P., Klein, S. A., and Taylor, K. E.: Causes of Higher Climate
Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, 1–12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Zhang(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L.: A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module, Atmos. Environ., 35, 549–560,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00326-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00326-5</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
