<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-1835-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Effects of thermodynamics, dynamics and aerosols on cirrus
clouds based on in situ observations and NCAR CAM6</article-title><alt-title>Effects of thermodynamics, dynamics and aerosols on cirrus clouds</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Effects of thermodynamics, dynamics and aerosols on cirrus clouds}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R.~Patnaude et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Patnaude</surname><given-names>Ryan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-8279</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Diao</surname><given-names>Minghui</given-names></name>
          <email>minghui.diao@sjsu.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0324-0897</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Xiaohong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Chu</surname><given-names>Suqian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Meteorology and Climate Science, San Jose State
University, San Jose, CA 95192, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Texas A&amp;M University, College
Station, TX 77843, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY
82071, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Minghui Diao (minghui.diao@sjsu.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1835</fpage><lpage>1859</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>May</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e121">Cirrus cloud radiative effects are largely affected by
ice microphysical properties, including ice water content (IWC), ice crystal
number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and mean diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These characteristics vary
significantly due to thermodynamic, dynamical and aerosol conditions. In
this work, a global-scale observation dataset is used to examine regional
variations of cirrus cloud microphysical properties, as well as several key
controlling factors, i.e., temperature, relative humidity with respect to
ice (RHi), vertical velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and aerosol number concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Results are compared with simulations from the National Center for
Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Atmosphere Model version 6 (CAM6).
Observed and simulated ice mass and number concentrations are constrained to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to reduce potential uncertainty from shattered ice in
data collection. The differences between simulations and observations are
found to vary with latitude and temperature. Comparing with averaged
observations at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km horizontal scale, simulations are
found to underestimate (overestimate) IWC by a factor of 3–10 in the
Northern (Southern) Hemisphere. Simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is overestimated in most
regions except the Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes. Simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
underestimated by a factor of 2, especially for warmer conditions
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), possibly due to
misrepresentation of ice particle growth/sedimentation. For RHi effects, the
frequency and magnitude of ice supersaturation are underestimated in
simulations for clear-sky conditions. The simulated IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show bimodal
distributions with maximum values at 100 % and 80 % RHi, differing from
the unimodal distributions that peak at 100 % in the observations. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
effects, both observations and simulations show variances of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) decreasing from the tropics to polar regions, but simulations show much
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the in-cloud condition than the clear-sky condition.
Compared with observations, simulations show weaker aerosol indirect effects
with a smaller increase of IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These findings provide an
observation-based guideline for improving simulated ice microphysical
properties and their relationships with key controlling factors at various
geographical locations.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e326">Cirrus clouds represent one of the most ubiquitous cloud types with an
estimated global coverage of approximately 20 % to 40 %
(Mace and Wrenn, 2013; Sassen
et al., 2008). According to the fifth assessment report of the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
(Boucher et al., 2013), the largest uncertainty in
estimating future climate change stems from clouds and aerosols. Unlike most
other cloud types, cirrus clouds may produce a net positive or negative
radiative forcing depending on their microphysical properties
(Stephens and Webster,
1981; Zhang et al., 1999), which are affected by meteorological conditions
and aerosol distributions. Tan et al. (2016) showed that the radiative effects of misrepresenting the prerequisite
condition of cirrus clouds – ice supersaturation (ISS, where relative
humidity with respect to ice (RHi) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) – can lead to an
average bias of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the top of the atmosphere. Other
modeling studies found large differences in the net cloud radiative forcing
depending on the fraction of activated ice-nucleating particles (INPs) and
the<?pagebreak page1836?> nucleation mechanisms (i.e., homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation)
through which the clouds form
(Liu
et al., 2012; Storelvmo and Herger, 2014). The large uncertainties in cirrus
cloud radiative forcing illustrate the need for further study of cirrus
cloud microphysical properties as well as their controlling factors in
various geographical locations.</p>
      <p id="d1e366">Ideally, a comprehensive quantification of cirrus cloud microphysical
properties globally based on high-resolution, in situ observations would
mitigate many uncertainties. However, challenges remain in field
measurements to achieve such spatial coverage. Previously, efforts have been
made to understand cirrus cloud properties based on their geographical
locations. Diao et al. (2014b) performed
a hemispheric comparison of in situ cirrus evolution and found little
difference in the clear-sky ISS frequency as well as the proportion of each
evolution phase between the Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere (NH and SH,
respectively). In situ observations of tropical, midlatitude and polar
cirrus clouds have shown that  ice water content (IWC) can vary orders of magnitude depending on
the geographical locations
(Heymsfield,
1977; Heymsfield et al., 2005, 2017; Mcfarquhar and Heymsfield, 1997;
Schiller et al., 2008). Wolf
et al. (2018) used balloon-based in situ observations to analyze
microphysical properties of Arctic ice clouds and found differences in
particle size distributions (PSDs) depending on the cloud origin.
Krämer et al. (2016, 2020) developed a cirrus cloud
climatology, focusing on tropical and midlatitude cirrus clouds, and showed
that cloud thickness is larger at lower altitudes and thus produces a more
negative radiative forcing. Moving from north to south using lidar-based
observations from two research cruises starting from Leipzig, Germany, one
to Punta Arenas, Chile, and the other one to Stellenbosch, South Africa,
Kanitz et al. (2011) observed a
decrease in the efficiency of heterogeneous nucleation in the SH, which
could be a result of fewer INPs. This hemispheric difference in aerosol
indirect effects is consistent with significantly higher aerosol number
concentrations in the NH (Minikin et al., 2003).
Using satellite observations from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared
Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO),
Mitchell et al. (2018) showed the dependence of ice particle effective diameter on
temperature, latitude, season and topography. Thorsen et al. (2013) used
CALIPSO data to examine cloud fraction of tropical cirrus clouds and showed
dependence on altitude and diurnal cycle. Tseng and Fu (2017) used CALIPSO
and Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate
(COSMIC) data and found that the tropical cold-point tropopause temperature
is a controlling factor of cirrus cloud fraction in the tropical tropopause
layer.</p>
      <p id="d1e369">Regional and hemispheric variations of cirrus microphysical properties are
produced by various controlling factors, such as thermodynamics (i.e.,
temperature and RHi), dynamics (e.g., vertical velocity) and aerosols (e.g.,
number concentration and composition). The effects of temperature have been
extensively studied from in situ observations
(Heymsfield
et al., 2017; Luebke et al., 2013, 2016; Schiller et al., 2008), showing an
increase of IWC towards warmer temperatures. A number of studies focused on
distributions of RHi have found that in-cloud RHi occurs most frequently at
or near 100 %
(Jensen
et al., 2001; Krämer et al., 2009). Another study by
Diao et al. (2017) found that using
different RHi thresholds (e.g., 108 % to 130 %) for ice nucleation in
simulations can influence IWC and ice crystal number concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in
convective cirrus. In addition, the spatial scales of ice-supersaturated
regions can vary from the micro- to mesoscales, largely depending on the
spatial variability of water vapor
(Diao
et al., 2014a). The distributions of vertical velocity have been
investigated in different types of cirrus clouds, such as in ridge-crest
cirrus, frontal cirrus and anvil cirrus
(Muhlbauer et
al., 2014a, b). Stronger updrafts are found to be associated with higher
occurrence frequency of ISS inside anvil and convective cirrus
(D'Alessandro et al.,
2017). Regarding the effects of aerosols,
Cziczo et al. (2013) and
Cziczo and Froyd (2014)
investigated ice crystal residuals from in situ observations and discovered
that the majority of midlatitude cirrus clouds form via heterogeneous
nucleation on mineral dust and metallic particles. Anthropogenic aerosols,
such as secondary organic aerosols, were found to be less effective INPs
compared with mineral dust (Prenni et al.,
2009). Based on remote sensing data,
Zhao et al. (2018, 2019)
showed that the correlations between ice crystal sizes and aerosol optical
depth can be either positive or negative depending on the meteorological
conditions in convective clouds.
Chylek et al. (2006) showed an
increase in ice crystal size during the more polluted winter months compared
with cleaner summer months over the eastern Indian Ocean, which the authors
speculate to be due to heterogeneous nucleation occurring at lower ice
supersaturation compared with homogeneous nucleation, therefore reducing the
ambient ice supersaturation magnitude and making homogeneous nucleation a
more difficult pathway. Using a global-scale dataset of multiple flight
campaigns, Patnaude and Diao (2020) isolated individual
effects on cirrus clouds from temperature, RHi, vertical velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
aerosol number concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). They found that when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 3–10 times
higher than average conditions, it shows strong positive correlations with
cirrus microphysical properties such as IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and number-weighted mean
diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These aerosol indirect effects are also susceptible to
whether or not thermodynamic and dynamical conditions are controlled,
demonstrating the importance of conducting a comprehensive analysis of
various key controlling factors altogether.</p>
      <p id="d1e435">More recently, in situ observations have been used to evaluate and improve
cirrus cloud parameterizations in global climate models (GCMs). Two types of
simulations have been frequently used for model evaluation, i.e.,
free-running
(Eidhammer
et al., 2014, 2017; Wang and Penner, 2010; Zhang et al., 2013) and nudged
(D'Alessandro
et al., 2019; Kooperman et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2017) simulations. For
free-running simulations, a comparison on statistical distributions<?pagebreak page1837?> of ice
microphysical properties is often used for model validation
(e.g., Penner et al., 2009). The
nudged simulation would nudge certain meteorological conditions towards
reanalysis data, such as horizontal wind and temperature
(e.g.,
D'Alessandro et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2017). These nudged simulations can
also be output to a similar location and time to those of the aircraft
observations. Given the importance and limited understanding of how aerosols
interact with cirrus clouds, much attention has been dedicated to the
parameterization of aerosol indirect effects
(Kärcher
and Lohmann, 2002, 2003; Kuebbeler et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014a).
Shi et
al. (2015) added the effects of pre-existing ice into the Community
Atmosphere Model version 5 (CAM5) and found a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing
aerosol concentration due to the reduction of homogeneous nucleation
frequency. Other studies also investigated the effect of updraft velocity on
simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerosol indirect effects
(Zhou
et al., 2016; Penner et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e461">This study aims to bridge the knowledge gap on how cirrus clouds vary
depending on geographical locations and environmental conditions by using a
comprehensive in situ observation dataset that includes seven US National
Science Foundation (NSF) flight campaigns. Observations were collected
aboard the NSF/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Gulfstream V
(GV) research aircraft. Descriptions of the seven flight campaigns,
instrumentations, model configurations of the NCAR Community Atmosphere
Model version 6 (CAM6) are provided in Sect. 2. Both observations and
simulations are used to examine the regional variations in the statistical
distributions of cirrus microphysical properties, including IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Sect. 3). Impacts of several key controlling factors, i.e., temperature,
RHi, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are examined in Sect. 4. Discussions on observation-based
findings and model evaluation results are included in Sect. 5.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Table}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e507">Descriptions of seven NSF flight campaigns conducted with
the NSF/NCAR GV research aircraft.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="3cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="2cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="2cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Acronym</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Field campaign</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Time</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Latitude, longitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Region*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Flight</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">In-cloud</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Clear-sky</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[-11.381102pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">hours</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">hours</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">hours</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(all temperatures)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">START08<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stratosphere-Troposphere Analyses of Regional Transport</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Apr–Jun 2008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26–62<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 117–86<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NM, NP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HIPPO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">HIAPER Pole-to-pole Observations deployments 2–5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Oct–Nov 2009; Mar–Apr 2010; Jun–Jul 2011; Aug–Sep 2011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">87<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–67<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 128<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">333</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">111</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PREDICT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PRE-Depression Investigation of Cloud Systems in the Tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Aug–Sep 2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10–28.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>86–37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">105</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">66</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DC3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry Project</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">May–Jun 2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25–42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>106–80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">144</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">54</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TORERO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tropical Ocean tRoposphere Exchange of Reactive halogen species and Oxygenated VOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jan–Feb 2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>105–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NT, ST, SM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">125</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CONTRAST<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CONvective TRansport of Active Species in the Tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jan–Feb 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>132<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E–105<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NM, NT, ST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">116</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ORCAS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ratio and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Airborne Southern Ocean (ORCAS) Study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jan–Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">75–18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>91–51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SM, SP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e510">* N, Northern Hemisphere; S, Southern Hemisphere; T, tropics; M,
midlatitudes; P, polar regions; A, all regions.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> UCAR/NCAR (2009, 2019a). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> UCAR/NCAR (2019b–e).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> UCAR/NCAR (2019f). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> UCAR/NCAR (2018a). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> UCAR/NCAR (2019g).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> UCAR/NCAR (2018b).<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> UCAR/NCAR (2018c). Full citations of
each dataset are included in the reference list.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>In situ observations and instrumentations</title>
      <p id="d1e1220">In this study, in situ airborne observations at 1 Hz are provided by
instruments aboard the NSF High-Performance Instrumented Airborne Platform
for Environmental Research (HIAPER) GV research aircraft. A comprehensive
global dataset is compiled based on seven major flight campaigns funded by
the NSF, including START08 (Pan et al., 2010), HIPPO deployments 2–5
(Wofsy, 2011),
PREDICT (Montgomery et al., 2012),
TORERO (Volkamer et al., 2015), DC3 (Barth et al., 2015), CONTRAST (Pan et al., 2017) and ORCAS
(Stephens et al., 2018). Table 1 provides a detailed summary of the seven flight campaigns, including
location, duration of flights, total flight hours of all temperatures and
flight hours for in-cloud and clear-sky conditions at temperatures
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C only. Maps comparing the flight tracks of in situ
observations and the collocated CAM6 nudged simulations (hereafter named
“CAM6-nudg” data) are shown in Fig. 1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1246">Global maps of flight tracks representing the seven
campaigns in this study for <bold>(a)</bold> in situ observations and <bold>(b)</bold> CAM6-nudg.
Colors denote different campaigns.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1261">For this study, ice particle measurements are provided by the Fast
2-Dimensional Cloud particle imaging probe (Fast-2DC) with a 64-diode laser
array for a range of 25–1600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Larger particles can be
reconstructed up to 3200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mass–dimensional relationship of
Brown and Francis (1995) is used to calculate IWC for
the Fast-2DC probe, which was previously used in other studies of the
Fast-2DC probe aboard the NSF GV aircraft
(Diao et al., 2014a, b,
2015). Number-weighted mean diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is calculated by summing up the
size of particles in each bin using the bin center and then dividing it by
the total number of particles. In order to mitigate the shattering effect,
particles with diameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., first two bins) are
excluded in the Fast-2DC measurements when calculating IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
Rosemount temperature probe was used for temperature measurements, which has
an accuracy and precision of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.01 K,
respectively. All analyses are restricted to temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
in order to exclude the presence of supercooled liquid
droplets in this study. Laboratory calibrated and<?pagebreak page1838?> quality-controlled water
vapor data were collected using the vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser
(VCSEL) hygrometer (Zondlo et al., 2010),
with an accuracy of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and precision of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %.
Both temperature and water vapor are used at 1 Hz resolution for this
analysis. Aerosol measurements were collected from the Ultra-High-Sensitivity
Aerosol Spectrometer (UHSAS), which uses 100 logarithmically
spaced bins ranging from 0.06–1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. RHi is calculated using
saturation vapor pressure with respect to ice from
Murphy and Koop (2005). The combined RHi
uncertainties from the measurements of temperature and water vapor range
from 6.9 % at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to 7.8 % at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.
Measurements are separated by cloud condition where in-cloud condition is
defined by the presence of at least one ice crystal from the Fast 2-DC probe
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The same in-cloud definition has been used by
several previous studies
(D'Alessandro
et al., 2017; Diao et al., 2014a, b, 2015, 2017; Tan et al., 2016), and
all other samples are defined as clear sky. For regional variation analysis,
data are binned by six latitudinal regions in the two hemispheres, that is,
NH polar (60–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), SH polar
(60–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), NH midlatitudes
(30–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), SH midlatitudes
(30–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), NH tropics
(0–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and SH tropics
(0–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S). The majority of observations
in the SH midlatitude and tropical regions are located over the oceans,
while the observations of NH midlatitude and polar regions are predominantly
over land.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1528"><bold>(a)</bold> Vertical profiles of temperature, <bold>(b)</bold> potential
temperature vs. temperature and <bold>(c)</bold> vertical profiles of
potential temperature based on in situ observations at temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Number of samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for 1 Hz observations is shown
in the figure legend. Colors denote six latitudinal regions.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1573">The vertical profiles of observed in-cloud temperature, clear-sky potential
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and their correlations are shown in Fig. 2. The
observations sampled temperatures from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and altitudes from 5–15 km, while a previous study
of Krämer et al. (2020) sampled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 5–19 km (their Fig. 2). The lowest
temperatures are found in the tropical regions and at the highest altitudes,
whereas polar regions show more observations at lower altitudes that satisfy
temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Distributions of cirrus cloud
properties (i.e., IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), in-cloud and clear-sky RHi, and clear-sky
water vapor mixing ratio for the observation dataset are shown in Fig. 3.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with decreasing altitudes, IWC slightly increases with
decreasing altitudes, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is almost independent of altitudes. Clear-sky
RHi and water vapor mixing ratio both increase with decreasing altitudes,
while in-cloud RHi is centered around 100 % and shows smaller dependency
on altitudes. Compared with Fig. 3 in Krämer et al. (2020), 48 % of their
ice particle samples have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which is below the size cut-off used in this study. The higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this
study also leads to lower range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.01–1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and higher
range of IWC (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared with that previous study
(i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.1–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC from
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), representing the sampling bias towards larger particles in
this study. The relationships of IWC with respect to meteorological
conditions (i.e., temperature and RHi) and other microphysical properties
(i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are shown in  Fig. S1 in the Supplement. The distributions of
IWC samples are relatively uniform at various temperature and RHi, while
more IWC<?pagebreak page1839?> samples are correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 100 and 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1908">Latitude and altitude distributions of <bold>(a)</bold> IWC, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> in-cloud RHi, <bold>(e)</bold> clear-sky RHi and <bold>(f)</bold> clear-sky water vapor
volume mixing ratio at temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Total
measurement hours and number of samples for given intervals are shown for
each variable. Note that the measurement ranges shown in the upper right
corner are not the full ranges (see Table 2 for the full ranges).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Climate model description and experiment design</title>
      <p id="d1e1987">This study uses model simulations based on the NCAR CAM6 model. Compared
with its previous version (the CAM5 model), CAM6 implemented a new scheme,
the Cloud Layers Unified by Binomials (CLUBB) for representations of
boundary layer turbulence, shallow convection and cloud macrophysics
(Bogenschutz et al., 2013). CLUBB is a
higher-order turbulence closure scheme that calculates prognostic
higher moments based on joint probability density functions (PDFs) for
vertical velocity, temperature and moisture (Golaz et al.,
2002). An improved bulk two-moment cloud microphysics scheme has been
implemented (Gettelman and Morrison, 2015) that
replaces diagnostic treatment of rain and snow with prognostic treatment of
all hydrometeors (i.e., rain and snow). This is coupled with a four-mode
aerosol model (MAM4)
(Liu et al., 2016)
for simulations of aerosols and aerosol–cloud interactions. It allows ice
crystals to form via homogeneous freezing of sulfate aerosols and
heterogeneous nucleation of dust particles
(Liu et
al., 2007; Liu and Penner, 2005). The model uses Wang et al. (2014b) for ice
nucleation, which implemented and improved
Hoose et al. (2010) by considering the
probability density function of contact angles for the classical nucleation
theory. The model also uses
Shi et al. (2015) for modifications of pre-existing ice. Finally, the deep convection
scheme (Zhang and McFarlane, 1995)
has been tuned to include sensitivity to convection inhibition.</p>
      <p id="d1e1990">Results from in situ observations are compared with two types of CAM6
simulations: nudged and free-running simulations. Simulations are based on a
finite-volume dynamical core (Lin, 2004) with a
horizontal resolution of 0.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 32 vertical levels. All simulations are conducted
using prescribed sea-surface temperature and present-day aerosol emissions
and include a 6-month spin-up time. CAM6 nudged simulations are nudged
spatially and temporally with meteorological data (i.e., 2-D horizontal wind
and temperature) from the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and
Applications version 2 (MERRA2)
(Gelaro et al., 2017) and
collocated with aircraft flight tracks in space and time. A nudged
simulation was conducted for each campaign independently and was combined
into one dataset to compare with observations. One free-running simulation
was conducted for the duration of all flight campaigns from July 2008 to
February 2016. To reduce the size of model output when comparing with
observations, a total of 24 instantaneous output data from the free-running
simulation are combined into one dataset (“CAM6-free” hereafter), which
includes 00:00 and 12:00 UTC for the first day of each month in 2010. Additional
sensitivity tests on different model output from the free-running simulation
show very minor differences in the statistical distributions of cirrus
microphysical properties and the correlations with their controlling factors
when selecting different years, seasons and days in a month.</p>
      <p id="d1e2018">In order to examine observations and simulations on more comparable scales,
a running average of 430 s was calculated for meteorological
parameters (i.e., temperature and RHi) and microphysical properties (i.e.,
IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which translates to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km horizontal
scales since the mean true air speed below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for all
campaigns was 230 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S2). When applying the running
average, both in-cloud and clear-sky conditions (i.e., where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC
values are zero) are included in the averages. Grid-mean quantities from
model output are used in comparisons with observations, including “IWC”,
“NUMICE”, “QSNOW” and “NSNOW”, which are mass and number
concentrations of ice particles and snow, respectively. Another type of
comparison between 1 Hz observations and in-cloud quantities from model
output is shown in the Supplement. Both methods have been
previously used in model evaluation, such as D'Alessandro et al. (2019),
who compared 200 s averaged aircraft<?pagebreak page1841?> observations with simulated grid-mean
quantities, and Righi et al. (2020), who compared 1 Hz aircraft
observations with simulated in-cloud quantities.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Table}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2105">Ranges of meteorological conditions and ice microphysical
properties for in situ 1 Hz observations, 430 s averaged observations,
CAM6-nudg and CAM6-free data used in this study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">In situ observations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">430 s averaged observations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CAM6-nudg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CAM6-free</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pa)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12 389–53 137</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37 778–53 410</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12 300–53 446</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 300–53 100</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RHi (%) in-cloud (clear sky)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.99–175.1 (0.3–174.9)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3–153.7 (0.3–134.6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.8–159.8 (0.05–107.6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.003–257.2 (0.001–181.4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IWC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.00004–23.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–11.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.039–542.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–188.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–207.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–516.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">62.5–3200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62.5–2175</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">62.5–2062</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">66.7–2556</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2510">A summary of the ranges of meteorological conditions and ice microphysical
properties for in situ observations and simulations is shown in Table 2.
Simulated RHi is calculated from simulated specific humidity and
temperature, and the calculation of saturation vapor pressure with respect
ice is based on the equation from Murphy and Koop
(2005). Simulated ice and snow are restricted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based
on the size cut-off of the Fast-2DC probe by applying methods from
Eidhammer et al. (2014).
Based on their equations 1 to 5, we followed their assumption that the shape
parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> equals 0 when calculating the slope parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Mass and number concentrations of ice and snow are further calculated based
on integrals of incomplete gamma functions from 62.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to infinity.
The simulated values of IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are calculated based on the combined
ice and snow population after applying the size restriction. In-cloud
conditions in simulations are defined by concurring conditions of IWC
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
based on size-restricted grid-mean quantities. These thresholds are the
lower limits from observations after calculating the 430 s averages. Note
that due to the ice crystal size constraint, some thin cirrus may not be
detected. In addition, analysis of simulated cirrus clouds is restricted to
similar pressure ranges as those measured in the seven campaigns. An
additional constraint on cloud fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was applied
to both nudged and free-running simulations to exclude extremely low values.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2667"><bold>(a)</bold> Observed size distribution (black line)
and reconstructed size distributions from simulated ice (blue) and
snow (cyan). Size truncations to diameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dashed
lines) are shown for simulated hydrometeors, while the remaining particles
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (solid lines) are used for comparisons with
observations. Size distributions for combined ice and snow in the
simulations (purple) are also shown before and after the size restriction.
Panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> show PDFs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC in the simulation before and after size
truncation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2736">To visualize the impact of the size truncation on simulated data, we
employed methods similar to Gettelman et al. (2020) and reconstructed the
simulated particle size distributions for snow and ice in Fig. 4a using
gamma functions from Morrison and Gettelman
(2008). Compared with the observations, the number density for combined ice
and snow is overestimated for smaller particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and underestimated for larger particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). After
applying the size restriction, the PDFs of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC show increasing
probability of small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and decreasing probability of small IWC due to the
removal of small particles (Fig. 4b and c).</p>
      <p id="d1e2802">Finally, simulated aerosol number concentrations are further categorized by
diameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), by summing the size-restricted concentrations of
the Aitken, accumulation and coarse aerosol modes. Previously, field
experiments found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlates well with INP number
concentrations (DeMott et
al., 2010). Even though that correlation was only determined based on
observations warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the separation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can help to examine the effects of larger and
smaller aerosols in this work.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2928">Geometric means of <bold>(a–c)</bold> IWC and <bold>(d–f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well
as <bold>(g–i)</bold> linear averages of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C temperature
intervals between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
compared between 1 Hz in situ observations (blue lines), 430 s averaged
observations (black lines) and CAM6-nudg (red lines). Observed and simulated
microphysical properties are binned by six latitudinal regions, where NH is
denoted by solid lines, and SH is denoted by dashed lines. The number of
samples for 1 Hz observations at temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the Northern
(Southern) Hemisphere tropical, midlatitude and polar
regions are 173 930 (15 569), 100 615 (3809) and 6704 (2606), respectively.
The number of samples for 430 s averaged observations in these regions are
355 082 (40 683), 233 546 (26 850) and 24 083 (10 252), respectively. The number
of samples for CAM6-nudg data in these regions are 3 241 592 (653 110), 2 052 353
(590 503) and 478 844 (209 662), respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Regional variations of cirrus cloud characteristics</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Cirrus cloud microphysical properties with respect to temperature</title>
      <p id="d1e3044">Three cirrus cloud microphysical properties (IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are examined in
relation to temperature at six latitudinal regions (Fig. 5). The standard
deviations of the IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in each temperature bin are shown in
Fig. S3. The 1 Hz observations of IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the NH
indicate clear latitudinal differences with the highest values occurring in
the midlatitudes, followed by tropics, then polar regions for temperatures
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, while for colder
temperatures the NH tropical region shows the highest IWC. In the SH, the
highest IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occur in the tropics, followed by the polar regions and
midlatitudes. Comparing the two hemispheres, IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show significant
reductions by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> order of magnitude from NH midlatitudes to SH
midlatitudes (Fig. 5b, e). These hemispheric differences in midlatitudes
may be due to air-mass differences between NH (more continental) and SH (more
oceanic) and/or more anthropogenic emissions in the NH. The IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are relatively similar between NH and SH tropical regions, while IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are higher in the SH polar region than in NH polar regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e3198">The simulations are further compared with averaged observations at a similar
horizontal scale of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km. After applying 430 s running
averages for observations, the average IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values decrease by
0.5–1.5 orders of magnitude compared with 1 Hz observations depending on
temperature and geographical region. Hemispheric differences are mostly
consistent between 1 and 430 s averaged observations except for polar
regions. CAM6-nudg data show a similar trend of average IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
respect to temperature as seen in observations; that is, the average IWC
increases with increasing temperature, consistent with previous observational
studies
(Krämer
et al., 2016; Luebke et al., 2013; Schiller et al., 2008), average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows
no clear trend with temperature, and average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with increasing
temperature. Differing from observations, CAM6 produces the highest IWC and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tropical regions, followed by midlatitudes, then polar regions for
both hemispheres. The simulated IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also show smaller differences
between hemispheres and latitudes. The CAM6-nudg data underestimate and
overestimate IWC in the NH and SH by 0.5–1 orders of magnitude,
respectively, with the largest discrepancies in the midlatitudes. The
simulations overestimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tropics and polar regions in both
hemispheres by 0.5–1 orders of magnitude and overestimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
SH midlatitudes by 1–2 orders of magnitude. The
simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is about half of the observed values in most regions except
polar regions. This result indicates “too many” and “too small”
simulated ice in most regions. The low bias of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates
possible misrepresentation of ice particle growth and sedimentation in the
model parameterization.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1842?><p id="d1e3345">A sensitivity test is conducted by comparing 1 Hz observations with in-cloud
quantities from model output (Fig. S4). Larger differences
are seen between simulated and observed IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. S4 compared
with Fig. 5. The directions (i.e., positive or negative) of model biases
of IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are generally consistent in both comparisons.</p>
      <p id="d1e3381">A previous study by Righi et al. (2020) evaluated the ice microphysical properties in the EMAC-MADE3
aerosol–climate model (i.e., ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry – Modal
Aerosol Dynamics model for Europe adapted for global applications, third
generation) by comparing in-cloud quantities from model output with 1 Hz in
situ observations of multiple aircraft field campaigns from
75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to 25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S
(Krämer
et al., 2009, 2016, 2020). Although that study included a greater number of smaller ice
particles (3–1280 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared with this study, they still showed
low biases of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 190–243 K and low biases of simulated IWC at
205–235 K, as well as high biases of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above 225 K, which are
generally in the same direction as the biases we found in CAM6 model. Note
that Righi et al. (2020)
implemented different cloud microphysics parameterizations compared with the
CAM6 model, including a two-moment cloud microphysics scheme
of Kuebbeler et al. (2014) and the ice
nucleation parameterization for cirrus clouds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K) from
Kärcher et al. (2006), which account for both
homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation and the competition between the two
mechanisms. Additional future intercomparison studies of these models are
warranted to examine the reasons behind the similar biases.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3450">Distributions of RHi at various temperatures and
geographical locations from in situ observations under (two left columns)
clear-sky and (two right columns) in-cloud conditions. Solid and dashed
black lines represent ice and liquid saturation, calculated based on
saturation vapor pressure with respect to ice and liquid from
Murphy and Koop (2005), respectively. Dash-dotted
line denotes the homogeneous freezing threshold for 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols
based on Koop et al. (2000).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3471">Similar to Fig. 6 but for 430 s scale.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3482">Similar to Fig. 6 but for CAM6-nudg data. RHi values
for simulations are calculated using simulated specific humidity and
temperature, based on the equation of saturation vapor pressure with respect
to ice from Murphy and Koop (2005).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{RHi and $\sigma _{{w}}$ distributions for in-cloud and clear-sky
conditions}?><title>RHi and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions for in-cloud and clear-sky
conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e3511">Regional distributions of RHi for clear-sky and in-cloud conditions are
shown for 1 Hz observations (Fig. 6), 430 s averaged observations (Fig. 7)
and simulations (Fig. 8). The 1 Hz observations show RHi magnitudes
ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">180</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % in both clear-sky
and in-cloud conditions, and are mostly located below the homogeneous freezing
line except for the NH tropical region. A few samples exceed the liquid
saturation line but are within the measurement uncertainties of RHi. This
result agrees with the RHi distributions based on previous midlatitudinal
observations (Cziczo et al., 2013). Differing from 1 Hz observations, 430 s
averaged observations show much lower RHi magnitudes for both clear-sky and
in-cloud conditions, ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to 120 %–140 %. For
clear-sky conditions, the majority of the observed and simulated RHi values
are below 100 %, while the CAM6-nudg data show fewer RHi exceeding ice
saturation. For in-cloud conditions, both 1 Hz observations and simulations
show that RHi frequently occur within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of ice
saturation, consistent with previous observation and modeling studies
(Diao
et al., 2014a, 2017; D'Alessandro et al., 2017, 2019; Krämer et al.,
2009), while almost no simulated RHi data exceed the homogeneous freezing
threshold. The higher RHi observed in the NH tropical region was also
observed by Krämer et al. (2009). Such features can be explained by the competition between higher
updrafts seen in the tropics and the depletion of water vapor from newly
nucleated ice particles as discussed in
Kärcher and Lohmann (2002). For the
polar regions, in-cloud RHi is skewed towards ISS in both observations and
simulations, indicating less effective water vapor depletion likely due to
lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Fig. 5e). Note that the simulation samples in the
tropical regions show peak frequencies at certain temperatures due to larger
bin sizes of pressure levels in the lower latitudes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3567">Distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated for every
40 s using the 1 Hz observations under (two left columns) clear-sky
and (two right columns) in-cloud conditions.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e3590">Similar to Fig. 9 but for 430 s averaged
observations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e3601">Similar to Fig. 9 but for the CAM6-nudg data.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1843?><p id="d1e3610">Regional distributions of the variance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for 1 Hz
observations at 40 and 430 s scales and CAM6 nudged simulations are shown
in Figs. 9, 10 and 11, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the observations
is calculated as the variance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> within each 40 and 430 s of data,
which correspond to a horizontal scale of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 100 km,
respectively. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in simulations is based on the “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>”
variable, which is calculated from the square root of turbulent kinetic
energy (TKE) (Gettelman et
al., 2010). Observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows the highest values in the
tropical and midlatitude regions, reaching up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while
the polar regions show updrafts up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A similar
decreasing trend of maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is seen in the simulations from
the lower to higher latitudes. The observations show similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
maximum values between clear-sky and in-cloud conditions, while the
simulations show much higher maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for in-cloud conditions
in the tropics (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), midlatitude (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and polar regions (0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
compared with those values in clear sky (i.e., 0.5, 0.25 and 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively). This result suggests that the model has a stronger dependence
on higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for cirrus cloud formation compared with
observations. We further examine the potential impact of convection in
simulations and observations. Figure S5 shows the locations
where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is seen in the observations as well as where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is seen in the CAM6-nudg data for in-cloud conditions.
Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in CAM6 is based on the turbulent scheme, higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
indicate that the convection scheme may be active and produce detrained ice
in convective outflows. The majority of observed and simulated in-cloud
samples do not appear to have high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that detrained ice
from the convection is unlikely a significant contribution. More future
investigation is needed to track cirrus cloud origins and quantify impacts
from convection.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e3965">Probability density functions (PDFs) for <bold>(a, d, g, j)</bold> temperature,
<bold>(b, e, h, k)</bold> RHi and <bold>(c, f, i, l)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
compared among <bold>(a–c)</bold> 1 Hz observations, <bold>(d–f)</bold> 430 s averaged
observations, <bold>(g–i)</bold> CAM6-nudg and <bold>(j–l)</bold> CAM6-free data. Note that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in panel <bold>(c)</bold> is calculated for every 40 s.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1844?><sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Individual impacts of key controlling factors on cirrus clouds</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Probability density functions of temperature, RHi and $\sigma _{{w}}$}?><title>Probability density functions of temperature, RHi and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <?pagebreak page1848?><p id="d1e4048">PDFs of temperature, RHi and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. 12. The
PDFs are normalized by the total number of samples of both clear-sky and
in-cloud conditions. The observations are located mostly around
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and the simulations
show similar temperature distributions. For the PDFs of RHi, the
observations and simulations all show a peak position around 100 % for
in-cloud condition. However, a secondary peak is shown in simulations at
80 % RHi, which is likely due to the parameter of RHi<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for ice
cloud fraction calculation being set at 80 % for representing variance of
humidity in a grid box (more details on RHi<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are described in
Gettelman et al., 2010).
In addition, the maximum RHi values for in-cloud conditions are 170 %, 154 %,
160 % and 257 % for 1 Hz observations, 430 s averaged observations,
CAM6-nudg and CAM6-free, respectively. The maximum RHi values for clear-sky
conditions are 175 %, 135 %, 108 % and 181 %, respectively. The
CAM6-free data show higher maximum RHi values than CAM6-nudg data, likely
due to additional data from tropical regions at temperatures below
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. 12j). When using a lower size cut-off (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
of ice particles for the simulation data, the number of in-cloud
samples increases by 4 % (Fig. S6). However, negligible
differences are seen in the PDFs of temperature, RHi and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
the two simulations between Figs. 12 and S6.</p>
      <p id="d1e4150">PDFs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show consistent results with Figs. 9–11, with
simulations showing much higher maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for in-cloud
conditions than clear-sky conditions, while observations show similar
maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both conditions. The lower maximum values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in simulations are most likely a result of the model missing
representations of gravity waves from topography, fronts and convection,
and only including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from turbulence.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e4210">Correlations between RHi and in-cloud IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(columns 1–3, respectively), compared among <bold>(a–c)</bold> in situ 1 Hz
observations, <bold>(d–f)</bold> 430 s averaged observations, <bold>(g–i)</bold> CAM6-nudg and
<bold>(j–l)</bold> CAM6-free data. Black lines and whiskers denote geometric means and
standard deviations, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page1850?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Effects of RHi and $\sigma _{{w}}$ on ice microphysics}?><title>Effects of RHi and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on ice microphysics</title>
      <p id="d1e4274">The relationships between ice microphysical properties and RHi are examined
in Fig. 13. For the 1 Hz observations, the maximum IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occur
slightly above ice saturation at 110 % RHi, while the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occur at
130 % RHi. The average IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase 1.5 orders of magnitude from
40 % to 110 % RHi and decrease 0.5 orders of magnitude (i.e., a factor
of 3) from 110 % to 130 % RHi. The maximum IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> do not occur at
the highest RHi most likely due to the consumption of water vapor by ice
deposition. High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at lower RHi (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) are likely
a result of sedimenting large ice crystals, which has been previously
observed by Diao et al. (2013) when
investigating the evolutionary phases of cirrus clouds. For 430 s averaged
observations, the peak IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occur at 100 %, 100 % and 115 %
RHi. The maximum IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are nearly the same between 1 and 430 s
averaged observations (i.e., 0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively)
near saturation, while the 430 s averaged observations show lower minimum
IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at very low RHi (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), which are 1.5 orders of
magnitude lower than 1 Hz observations. This feature is due to in-cloud
segments being longer around saturation compared with subsaturated
conditions as shown in Diao et al. (2013), which means that fewer clear-sky conditions are being included in the
430 s averages around saturation and therefore show little reduction of the
IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to spatial averaging.</p>
      <p id="d1e4440">In contrast to observations, both CAM6-nudg and CAM6-free simulations show
bimodal distributions of IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the primary peak at 100 % RHi and
the secondary peak at 80 % RHi. The secondary peak at RHi 80 % is likely
produced by the RHi<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter reflecting subgrid-scale RHi variance
as mentioned above (Gettelman
et al., 2010), which was set at the default value (80 % RHi) for both
simulations. The primary peak at 100 % RHi is likely a result of the
minimum threshold for heterogeneous ice nucleation being set at 120 % as
well as a subgrid variability scaling factor of 1.2 being considered (Wang et
al., 2014a). Similar to 430 s averaged observations, IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show steep
increase (i.e., 3–4 orders of magnitude) from 40 % to 100 %.
Increases of average IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are seen in the simulations as RHi increases
from 120 % to 160 %, differing from the decreasing trend seen in the
observations. These higher values of IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near 160 % are possibly
due to RHi reaching the homogeneous nucleation thresholds, where ice
nucleation becomes more dependent upon temperature and updraft speed
(Liu and Penner, 2005). Note that at this same
point as IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase, there is a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which also suggests
homogeneous nucleation in the model. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–RHi correlations, both
simulations show similar results to the observations, with the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
around 130 % RHi and some large ice particles in the subsaturated
conditions. The large variability of observed ice microphysical properties
is also significantly underestimated in the model for ISS conditions.
Standard deviations are 0.5–1 orders of magnitude lower for IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
a factor of 2 lower for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared with observations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e4565">Similar to Fig. 13 but for correlations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of observations are calculated for panels <bold>(a–c)</bold> every 40 s
and <bold>(d–f)</bold> every 430 s using the 1 Hz
observations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4603">Comparing the correlations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 14), the simulations
show increasing IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which agree with
observations, although the increases of IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are smaller in the
simulations than the 430 s observations. The simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is relatively
constant with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which differs from the slight
positive correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the observations.
This slight positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlation is likely due to the
growth of ice particles as cirrus clouds evolve with continuous updrafts
that supply excess water vapor above ice saturation, which was previously
discussed in a cirrus cloud evolution analysis (Diao et al., 2013). The
simulations may overlook this positive correlation for several reasons,
such as the lack of temporal resolution to resolve cirrus evolution in the
growth phase, the lack of vertical velocity subgrid variabilities (as
discussed in
Zhou et al., 2016) and a dry bias (i.e., lower RHi) in the model (as discussed in
Wu
et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e4717">Comparing the performance of two types of simulations, both CAM6-nudg and
CAM6-free show bimodal distributions for IWC–RHi and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–RHi
correlations, and they both show positive correlations for IWC–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This result indicates that the general
trends in these correlations are statistically robust and less affected by
sampling sizes and geographical locations. For correlations with RHi, the
maximum IWC value in CAM6-nudg and CAM6-free is lower than the 430 s
averaged observations by a factors of 25 and 100, respectively. The maximum
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value in CAM6-nudg is similar to the 430 s averaged observations, while
that value in CAM6-free is lower by a factor of 3. For correlations with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, there are no significant differences for the maximum IWC
between the two simulation types. The maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value in CAM6-nudg and
CAM6-free is higher than the 430 s averaged observations by  factors of 3
and 10, respectively. These results show that CAM6-nudg data, which are
collocated with flight tracks, produce IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values closer to the 430 s
averaged observations than CAM6-free, possibly due to the variabilities of
IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in different geographical locations as shown in Fig. 5.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e4822">Aerosol indirect effects from logarithmic-scale
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <bold>(a–c)</bold> IWC, <bold>(d–f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(g–i)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(j–l)</bold> cloud
fraction, compared among 1 Hz observations (left column), 430 s averaged
observations (middle column) and CAM6-nudg data (right column). Number of
samples of each bin is shown in the bottom row <bold>(m–o)</bold>. Cloud fraction is
calculated as the number of in-cloud samples over the total number of
samples for a given temperature and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{16}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p id="d1e4898">Similar to Fig. 15 but examined for
log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1835/2021/acp-21-1835-2021-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Aerosol indirect effects</title>
      <?pagebreak page1852?><p id="d1e4940">The effects of larger and smaller aerosols (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
on ice microphysical properties are further examined for observations and
CAM6-nudg data (Figs. 15 and 16). Cloud fraction is calculated in each
temperature–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin by normalizing the number of in-cloud samples with the
total number of samples in that bin for both observations and simulations.
For three cirrus microphysical properties (i.e., IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), positive
correlations are seen in 1 Hz observations with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> values are associated with
significant increases in cloud fraction. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, higher IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and cloud fraction are seen when
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is observed, with positive correlations of IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This finding indicates that larger aerosols provide
an effective pathway of ice particle formation for colder conditions. The
higher IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are only shown in much higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
demonstrating that larger aerosols facilitate ice formation more effectively
than smaller aerosols at this temperature range, possibly due to the
activation of larger aerosols as INPs for heterogeneous nucleation. Compared
with 1 Hz observations, 430 s averaged observations show weaker correlations
of IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, they do still show higher IWC
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C associated
with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <?pagebreak page1853?><p id="d1e5431">The CAM6-nudg simulation shows increasing average IWC, average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and cloud
fraction with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with the observations. But
at temperatures below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, simulated IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> do not
show a sudden increase with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as shown in the observations.
The simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slightly decreases with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, differing
from the increasing trend seen in observations. For aerosol indirect effect
analysis based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the comparison results are similar to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; that is, the CAM6-nudg simulation is able to represent positive
correlations of IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and cloud fraction with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
However, the CAM6-nudg simulation shows smaller (larger) increase of IWC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at
very high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared with the 430 s averaged observations.
The model also misses positive correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seen in both
1 Hz and 430 s averaged observations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e5714">In this study, we investigate the statistical distributions of cirrus cloud
microphysical properties (i.e., IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as well as several key
controlling factors (i.e., temperature, RHi, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using a
comprehensive in situ observational dataset and GCM simulations. Regional
variations of cirrus cloud microphysical properties are examined for six
latitudinal regions in two hemispheres. Two types of CAM6 simulations are
evaluated, i.e., nudged and free-running simulations.</p>
      <p id="d1e5761">Regarding the regional variations in 1 Hz observations, the highest and
lowest IWC values were observed in NH midlatitudes and SH midlatitudes,
respectively, while the polar regions show the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
warmer conditions (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
(Fig. 5). The hemispheric differences between NH and SH midlatitudes
indicate a possible role of anthropogenic aerosols and/or land–sea<?pagebreak page1854?> contrast
in controlling ice microphysical properties. Thermodynamic and dynamic
conditions can also affect nucleation mechanisms. For example, the tropical
regions show the highest IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at temperatures below
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C possibly due to convection anvils with the droplet
freezing from down below or homogeneous nucleation in gravity waves
generated by convection. This feature is corroborated by the fact that
tropical regions show the highest RHi values for both clear-sky and in-cloud
conditions (Fig. 6), while the midlatitude and polar regions show fewer
samples exceeding the homogeneous nucleation threshold. The higher RHi
values in tropics are likely contributed by higher updrafts (indicated by
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 9). These results demonstrate the
important roles of these controlling factors on cirrus clouds at different
latitudinal and temperature ranges.</p>
      <p id="d1e5857">Evaluating the model simulations of cirrus microphysical properties,
different model performance results are seen in different regions. For
example, simulations underestimated the IWC in NH (Fig. 5), possibly due
to model dry bias to form ice clouds (as discussed in
Wu
et al., 2017) and/or smaller aerosol indirect effects on IWC in the
simulations (Figs. 15 and 16). Differences in the particle size
distribution, such as lower number density of larger particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the simulation (Fig. 4a), may also contribute to the
underestimation of IWC by the simulation. All the comparison results on IWC,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are only applicable to the size range being
evaluated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For RHi distributions, both simulations represent a similar peak
position at ice saturation for in-cloud RHi PDFs compared with observations
but CAM6-nudg underestimates the frequency and magnitude of ISS for
clear-sky condition. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions, simulations
represent similar regional variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared with
observations, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreasing from lower to higher
latitudes. The model performs well for representing the effects of RHi and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on ice microphysical properties, specifically for showing
the maximum IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 % RHi and the positive correlations with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Some differences include the simulated average IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
showing a secondary peak position at 80 % RHi, likely due to the minimum
RHi threshold used in the model parameterization. Both simulation types show
similar correlation trends of ice microphysical properties with respect to
RHi and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. CAM6-nudg performs better for representing IWC and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> magnitudes than CAM6-free, possibly due to better collocation between
CAM6-nudg and observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e6023">For aerosol indirect effects, the simulations underestimate IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
well as cloud fraction at colder conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) when larger aerosols exist, indicating that the
effectiveness of larger aerosols is underestimated at the colder conditions.
The observations also show higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than simulations by a factor of 3–4
at warmer temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), indicating misrepresentation of ice particle growth and/or sedimentation
in the simulations. In addition, the IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 430 s averaged
observations show an increase at higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), while simulations only show a
significant increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This result indicates that aerosol indirect
effects may be underestimated especially for higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. It is
possible that small ice crystals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may have formed
under high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but are excluded due to the size constraint. Additionally,
because INP activation is highly dependent upon temperature, we acknowledge
the limitation of using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to indicate INP concentrations. The
assumption of ice mass and dimension relationship from
Brown and Francis (1995) may also lead to
uncertainties due to various ice habits. These caveats call for more
investigation of small ice measurements, INP measurements at temperature
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and measurements of various ice habits.</p>
      <p id="d1e6302">Overall, the global-scale observational dataset used in this study provides
statistically robust distributions of cirrus cloud microphysical properties,
which can be used to evaluate the effects of thermodynamics, dynamics and
aerosols on cirrus clouds in a global climate model. Extending from previous
studies that investigated climate model sensitivity to individual cirrus
cloud controlling factors, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Shi and Liu, 2016), RHi (D'Alessandro et al., 2019),
water vapor (Wu et al., 2017) and aerosols (Wang et al.,
2014a), this study provides an analysis of all factors. In addition, further
attention was given towards evaluating these factors in the simulations
based on geographical locations. For both observations and simulations,
higher ice supersaturations and stronger vertical motions are shown in
tropical and midlatitude regions, which possibly lead to increased
homogeneous nucleation and convection-generated cirrus, consistent with
higher IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in these regions compared with polar regions.
In addition, underestimating aerosol indirect effects in the simulations
likely contributes to the underestimation of IWC in the NH. Even though
small ice particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are excluded in this study,
correlations between ice microphysical properties and these key controlling
factors are still clearly seen in the observation dataset. In addition,
using two methods that compare observations on the horizontal scales of 230 m
and 100 km with simulations, both methods show similar signs for model
biases of IWC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while smaller model biases are seen when comparing
against the coarser resolution observations. This study underscores the
importance of correctly representing the thermodynamic, dynamic and aerosol
conditions in climate models at various regions, as well as accurately
simulating their correlations with ice microphysical properties. Failing to
do so may result in biases of cirrus cloud microphysical properties
depending on different regions and temperatures, leading to biases in cirrus
cloud radiative effects on a global scale.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6381">The source code and namelist of the CAM6 model version used in this work are archived on the NCAR Cheyenne campaign storage system under /glade/campaign/univ/usjs0006/. Access will be granted by the authors on request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6387">Observations from the seven NSF flight campaigns are accessible at
<uri>https://data.eol.ucar.edu/</uri> (last access: 11 December 2020):
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6Z31X06" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6Z31X06</ext-link> (UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory, 2009), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6BC3WKB" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6BC3WKB</ext-link>
(UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory, 2018a), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6TX3CK0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6TX3CK0</ext-link> (UCAR/NCAR – Earth
Observing Laboratory, 2018b), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D65T3HWR" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D65T3HWR</ext-link> (UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
2018c), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6NZ85Z4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6NZ85Z4</ext-link> (UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory, 2019a), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6JW8C64" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6JW8C64</ext-link>
(UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory, 2019b), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6QF8R6R" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6QF8R6R</ext-link> (UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing
Laboratory, 2019c), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6V40SK6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6V40SK6</ext-link> (UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory, 2019d), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6CZ35HX" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6CZ35HX</ext-link>
(UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory, 2019e), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D61R6NV5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D61R6NV5</ext-link> (UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory, 2019f),
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6668BHR" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6668BHR</ext-link> (UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory, 2019g).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e6428">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1835-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1835-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6437">RP and MD contributed to the development of the ideas,
conducted quality control of aircraft-based observations and wrote the
majority of the manuscript. RP contributed to all model simulations
and the subsequent data analysis. XL and SC provided expertise on
the setup of CAM6 model simulations and provided input for the analysis of
simulation data.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6443">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6449">Ryan Patnaude, Minghui Diao, Xiaohong Liu and Suqian Chu acknowledge funding support from US National
Science Foundation (see financial support below). Ryan Patnaude also
acknowledges support from the San Jose State University Walker Fellowship.
For funding support during the summers of 2016 and 2018, Minghui Diao acknowledges the NCAR
Advanced Study Program (ASP) Faculty Fellowship. We would like to acknowledge the NCAR/Earth
Observation Laboratory flight teams from the seven flight campaigns:
START08, HIPPO, PREDICT, DC3, CONTRAST, TORERO and ORCAS. For in situ
observations of water vapor by the VCSEL hygrometer, field support,
calibration and QA/QC were conducted by Minghui Diao, Joshua DiGangi, Mark Zondlo and Stuart Beaton.
Additional appreciation is given to Jorgen Jensen, Chris Webster
and Christina McCluskey for helpful discussions.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6454">This research has been supported by the National Science Foundation,
Directorate for Geosciences (grant nos. AGS-1642291, OPP-1744965 and AGS-1642289/2001903).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6460">This paper was edited by Martina Krämer and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Barth, M. C., Cantrell, C. A., Brune, W. H., Rutledge, S. A., Crawford, J.
H., Huntrieser, H., Carey, L. D., MacGorman, D., Weisman, M., Pickering, K.
E., Bruning, E., Anderson, B., Apel, E., Biggerstaff, M., Campos, T.,
Campuzano-Jost, P., Cohen, R., Crounse, J., Day, D. A., Diskin, G., Flocke,
F., Fried, A., Garland, C., Heikes, B., Honomichl, S., Hornbrook, R.,
Gregory Huey, L., Jimenez, J. L., Lang, T., Lichtenstern, M., Mikoviny, T.,
Nault, B., O'Sullivan, D., Pan, L. L., Peischl, J., Pollack, I., Richter,
D., Riemer, D., Ryerson, T., Schlager, H., St. Clair, J., Walega, J.,
Weibring, P., Weinheimer, A., Wennberg, P., Wisthaler, A., Wooldridge, P. J.,
and Ziegler, C.: The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) field
campaign, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1281–1310,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00290.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00290.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bogenschutz, P. A., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Larson, V. E., Craig, C.,
and Schanen, D. P.: Higher-order turbulence closure and its impact on
climate simulations in the community atmosphere model, J. Climate, 26,
9655–9676, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00075.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00075.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S. K., Sherwood, S. C., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Clouds and aerosols,
Clim. Chang. 2013 Phys. Sci. Basis Work. Gr. I Contrib. to Fifth Assess.
Rep. Intergov. Panel Clim. Chang., 9781107057, 571–658,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brown, P. R. A. and Francis, P. N.: Improved Measurements of the Ice Water
Content in Cirrus Using a Total-Water Probe, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 12,
410–414, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012&lt;0410:IMOTIW&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012&lt;0410:IMOTIW&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chylek, P., Dubey, M. K., Lohmann, U., Ramanathan, V., Kaufman, Y. J.,
Lesins, G., Hudson, J., Altmann, G., and Olsen, S.: Aerosol indirect effect
over the Indian Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06806,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025397" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL025397</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J. and Froyd, K. D.: Sampling the composition of cirrus ice
residuals, Atmos. Res., 142, 15–31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.06.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.06.012</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M., Zondlo, M.
A., Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., and Murphy, D. M.: Clarifying the dominant
sources and mechanisms of cirrus cloud formation, Science,
340, 1320–1324, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1234145</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>D'Alessandro, J. J., Diao, M., Wu, C., Liu, X., Chen, M., Morrison, H.,
Eidhammer, T., Jensen, J. B., Bansemer, A., Zondlo, M. A., and DiGangi, J.
P.: Dynamical conditions of ice supersaturation and ice nucleation in
convective systems: A comparative analysis between in situ aircraft
observations and WRF simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 2844–2866,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025994" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025994</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>D'Alessandro, J. J., Diao, M., Wu, C., Liu, X., Jensen, J. B., and Stephens,
B. B.: Cloud phase and relative humidity distributions over the Southern
Ocean in austral summer based on in sit<?pagebreak page1856?>u observations and CAM5 simulations,
J. Climate, 32, 2781–2805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0232.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0232.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Predicting
global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0910818107</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Heymsfield, A. J., Beaton, S. P., and Rogers, D. C.:
Evolution of ice crystal regions on the microscale based on in situ
observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3473–3478,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50665" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50665</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Heymsfield, A. J., Avallone, L. M., Paige, M. E., Beaton, S. P., Campos, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Cloud-scale ice-supersaturated regions spatially correlate with high water vapor heterogeneities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2639–2656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2639-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2639-2014</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Heymsfield, A. J., and Beaton, S. P.: Hemispheric
comparison of cirrus cloud evolution using in situ measurements in HIAPER
Pole-to-Pole Observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1–8,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059873" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL059873</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Diao, M., Jensen, J. B., Pan, L. L., Homeyer, C. R., Honomichl, S., Bresch,
J. F., and Bansemer, A.: Distributions of ice supersaturation and ice
crystals from airborne observations in relation to upper tropospheric
dynamical boundaries, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 5101–5121,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023139</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Diao, M., Bryan, G. H., Morrison, H., and Jensen, J. B.: Ice nucleation
parameterization and relative humidity distribution in idealized squall-line
simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 2761–2787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0356.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-16-0356.1</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eidhammer, T., Morrison, H., Bansemer, A., Gettelman, A., and Heymsfield, A. J.: Comparison of ice cloud properties simulated by the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5) with in-situ observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10103–10118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10103-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10103-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eidhammer, T., Morrison, H., Mitchell, D., Gettelman, A., and Erfani, E.:
Improvements in global climate model microphysics using a consistent
representation of ice particle properties, J. Climate, 30, 609–629,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0050.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0050.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs,
L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan,
K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A.,
da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G. K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D.,
Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M.,
Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The modern-era retrospective
analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate,
30, 5419–5454, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gettelman, A. and Morrison, H.: Advanced two-moment bulk microphysics for
global models. Part I: Off-line tests and comparison with other schemes, J. Climate, 28, 1268–1287, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00102.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00102.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gettelman, A., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., Morrison, H., Park, S., Conley, A. J.,
Klein, S. A., Boyle, J., Mitchell, D. L., and Li, J. L. F.: Global
simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation with an improved cloud
scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115,
1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013797" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013797</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gettelman, A., Bardeen, C. G., McCluskey, C. S., Järvinen, E., Stith, J., Bretherton, C., McFarquhar, G., Twohy, C., D'Alessandro, J., and Wu, W.:  Simulating Observations of Southern Ocean
Clouds and Implications for Climate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032619,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032619" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD032619</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Golaz, J. C., Larson, V. E., and Cotton, W. R.: A PDF-Based Model for
Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Method and Model Description, J. Atmos.
Sci., 59, 3540–3551, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Heymsfield, A. J.: Precipitation Development in Stratiform Ice Clouds: A
Microphysical and Dynamical Study, J. Atmos. Sci., 367–381, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heymsfield, A. J., Winker, D., and van Zadelhoff, G. J.: Extinction-ice water
content-effective radius algorithms for CALIPSO, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
32, 1–4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022742" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL022742</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heymsfield, A. J., Krämer, M., Wood, N. B., Gettelman, A., Field, P. R.,
and Liu, G.: Dependence of the Ice Water Content and Snowfall Rate on
Temperature, Globally: Comparison of in Situ Observations, Satellite Active
Remote Sensing Retrievals, and Global Climate Model Simulations, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Climatol., 56, 189–215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0230.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0230.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J. E., Chen, J. P., and Hazra, A.: A
classical-theory-based parameterization of heterogeneous ice nucleation by
mineral dust, soot, and biological particles in a global climate model, J.
Atmos. Sci., 67, 2483–2503, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3425.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010JAS3425.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jensen, E. J., Toon, O. B., Vay, S. A., Ovarlez, J., May, R., Bui, T. P.,
Twohy, C. H., Gandrud, B. W., Pueschel, R. F., and Schumann, U.: Prevalence
of ice-supersaturated regions in the upper troposphere: Implications for
optically thin ice cloud formation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
17253–17266, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900526" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900526</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kanitz, T., Seifert, P., Ansmann, A., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D.,
Casiccia, C., and Rohwer, E. G.: Contrasting the impact of aerosols at
northern and southern midlatitudes on heterogeneous ice formation, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 38, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048532" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL048532</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A parameterization of cirrus cloud
formation: Homogeneous freezing of supercooled aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.,
107, D2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000470" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000470</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A parameterization of cirrus cloud
formation: Heterogeneous freezing, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4402,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003220" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003220</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B., Hendricks, J., and Lohmann, U.: Physically based
parameterization of cirrus cloud formation for use in global atmospheric
models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D01205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006219" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006219</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the
determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature,
406, 611–614, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/35020537</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kooperman, G. J., Pritchard, M. S., Ghan, S. J., Wang, M., Somerville, R. C.
J., and Russell, L. M.: Constraining the influence of natural variability to
improve estimates of global aerosol indirect effects in a nudged version of
th<?pagebreak page1857?>e Community Atmosphere Model 5, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 1–16,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018588" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018588</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Schiller, C., Afchine, A., Bauer, R., Gensch, I., Mangold, A., Schlicht, S., Spelten, N., Sitnikov, N., Borrmann, S., de Reus, M., and Spichtinger, P.: Ice supersaturations and cirrus cloud crystal numbers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3505–3522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Afchine, A., Fahey, D., Jensen, E., Khaykin, S., Kuhn, T., Lawson, P., Lykov, A., Pan, L. L., Riese, M., Rollins, A., Stroh, F., Thornberry, T., Wolf, V., Woods, S., Spichtinger, P., Quaas, J., and Sourdeval, O.: A microphysics guide to cirrus – Part 2: Climatologies of clouds and humidity from observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12569–12608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12569-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-12569-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kuebbeler, M., Lohmann, U., Hendricks, J., and Kärcher, B.: Dust ice nuclei effects on cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3027–3046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3027-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3027-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, S. J.: A “vertically Lagrangian” finite-volume dynamical core for
global models, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 2293–2307,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132&lt;2293:AVLFDC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132&lt;2293:AVLFDC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, X. and Penner, J. E.: Ice nucleation parameterization for global
models, Meteorol. Zeitschrift, 14, 499–514,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0059</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Penner, J. E., Ghan, S. J., and Wang, M.: Inclusion of ice
microphysics in the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model version 3 (CAM3), J. Climate, 20, 4526–4547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4264.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI4264.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Shi, X., Zhang, K., Jensen, E. J., Gettelman, A., Barahona, D., Nenes, A., and Lawson, P.: Sensitivity studies of dust ice nuclei effect on cirrus clouds with the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 12061–12079, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Ma, P.-L., Wang, H., Tilmes, S., Singh, B., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., and Rasch, P. J.: Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 505–522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Luebke, A. E., Avallone, L. M., Schiller, C., Meyer, J., Rolf, C., and Krämer, M.: Ice water content of Arctic, midlatitude, and tropical cirrus – Part 2: Extension of the database and new statistical analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6447–6459, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6447-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-6447-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Luebke, A. E., Afchine, A., Costa, A., Grooß, J.-U., Meyer, J., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Avallone, L. M., Baumgardner, D., and Krämer, M.: The origin of midlatitude ice clouds and the resulting influence on their microphysical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5793–5809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5793-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5793-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mace, G. G. and Wrenn, F. J.: Evaluation of the hydrometeor layers in the
East and West Pacific within ISCCP cloud-top pressure-optical depth bins
using merged CloudSat and CALIPSO data, J. Climate, 26, 9429–9444,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00207.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00207.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mcfarquhar, G. M. and Heymsfield, A. J.: Parameterization of tropical cirrus
ice crystal size distributions and implications for radiative transfer:
Results from CEPEX, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 2187–2200,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054&lt;2187:POTCIC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054&lt;2187:POTCIC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Minikin, A., Petzold, A., Ström, J., Krejci, R., Seifert, M., van Velthoven, P., Schlager, H., and Schumann, U.: Aircraft observations of the upper tropospheric fine particle aerosol in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres at midlatitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1503, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016458" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL016458</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mitchell, D. L., Garnier, A., Pelon, J., and Erfani, E.: CALIPSO (IIR–CALIOP) retrievals of cirrus cloud ice-particle concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17325–17354, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17325-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17325-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Montgomery, M. T., Davis, C., Dunkerton, T., Wang, Z., Velden, C., Torn, R.,
Majumdar, S. J., Zhang, F., Smith, R. K., Bosart, L., Bell, M. M., Haase, J.
S., Heymsfield, A., Jensen, J., Campos, T., and Boothe, M. A.: The
pre-depression investigation of cloud-systems in the tropics (PREDICT)
experiment: Scientific basis, new analysis tools, and some first results,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 153–172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00046.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00046.1</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Morrison, H. and Gettelman, A.: A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud
microphysics scheme in the community atmosphere model, version 3 (CAM3).
Part I: Description and numerical tests, J. Climate, 21, 3642–3659,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2105.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008JCLI2105.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Muhlbauer, A., Ackerman, T. P., Comstock, J. M., Diskin, G. S., Evans, S.
M., Lawson, R. P., and Marchand, R. T.: Impact of large-scale dynamics on the
microphysical properties of midlatitude cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 119,
3976–3996, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020035</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Muhlbauer, A., Kalesse, H., and Kollias, P.: Vertical velocities and
turbulence in midlatitude anvil cirrus: A comparison between in situ
aircraft measurements and ground-based Doppler cloud radar retrievals,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 7814–7821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062279" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062279</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M. and Koop, T.: Review of the vapour pressures of ice and
supercooled water for atmospheric applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
131, 1539–1565, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.94" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1256/qj.04.94</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pan, L. L., Bowman, K. P., Atlas, E. L., Wofsy, S. C., Zhang, F., Bresch, J.
F., Ridley, B. A., Pittman, J. V., Homeyer, C. R., Romashkin, P., and Cooper,
W. A.: The stratosphere-troposphere analyses of regional transport 2008
experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 327–342,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2865.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009BAMS2865.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pan, L. L., Atlas, E. L., Salawitch, R. J., Honomichl, S. B., Bresch, J. F.,
Randel, W. J., Apel, E. C., Hornbrook, R. S., Weinheimer, A. J., Anderson,
D. C., Andrews, S. J., Baidar, S., Beaton, S. P., Campos, T. L., Carpenter,
L. J., Chen, D., Dix, B., Donets, V., Hall, S. R., Hanisco, T. F., Homeyer,
C. R., Huey, L. G., Jensen, J. B., Kaser, L., Kinnison, D. E., Koenig, T.
K., Lamarque, J.-F., Liu, C., Luo, J., Luo, Z. J., Montzka, D. D., Nicely,
J. M., Pierce, R. B., Riemer, D. D., Robinson, T., Romashkin, P.,
Saiz-Lopez, A., Schauffler, S., Shieh, O., Stell, M. H., Ullmann, K.,
Vaughan, G., Volkamer, R., and Wolfe, G.: The Convective Transport o<?pagebreak page1858?>f Active
Species in the Tropics (CONTRAST) Experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
98, 106–128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-14-00272.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/bams-d-14-00272.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Patnaude, R. and Diao, M.: Aerosol indirect effects on cirrus clouds based on global aircraft observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086550, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086550" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL086550</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Penner, J. E., Chen, Y., Wang, M., and Liu, X.: Possible influence of anthropogenic aerosols on cirrus clouds and anthropogenic forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 879–896, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-879-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-879-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Penner, J. E., Zhou, C., Garnier, A., and Mitchell, D. L.: Anthropogenic
Aerosol Indirect Effects in Cirrus Clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123,
11652–11677, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029204" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029204</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prenni, A. J., Petters, M. D., Faulhaber, A., Carriço, C. M., Ziemann,
P. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., and DeMott, P. J.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation
measurements of secondary organic aerosol generated from ozonolysis of
alkenes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036957" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL036957</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Righi, M., Hendricks, J., Lohmann, U., Beer, C. G., Hahn, V., Heinold, B., Heller, R., Krämer, M., Ponater, M., Rolf, C., Tegen, I., and Voigt, C.: Coupling aerosols to (cirrus) clouds in the global EMAC-MADE3 aerosol–climate model, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1635–1661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1635-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-1635-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sassen, K., Wang, Z., and Liu, D.: Global distribution of cirrus clouds from
CloudSat/cloud-aerosol lidar and infrared pathfinder satellite observations
(CALIPSO) measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–12,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009972" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009972</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schiller, C., Krämer, M., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., and Sitnikov, N.: Ice
water content of Arctic, midlatitude, and tropical cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010342" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010342</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shi, X. and Liu, X.: Effect of cloud-scale vertical velocity on the
contribution of homogeneous nucleation to cirrus formation and radiative
forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 6588–6595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069531" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069531</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shi, X., Liu, X., and Zhang, K.: Effects of pre-existing ice crystals on cirrus clouds and comparison between different ice nucleation parameterizations with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1503–1520, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1503-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1503-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stephens, B. B., Long, M. C., Keeling, R. F., Kort, E. A., Sweeney, C.,
Apel, E. C., Atlas, E. L., Beaton, S., Bent, J. D., Blake, N. J., Bresch, J.
F., Casey, J., Daube, B. C., Diao, M., Diaz, E., Dierssen, H., Donets, V.,
Gao, B.-C., Gierach, M., Green, R., Haag, J., Hayman, M., Hills, A. J.,
Hoecker-Martínez, M. S., Honomichl, S. B., Hornbrook, R. S., Jensen, J.
B., Li, R.-R., McCubbin, I., McKain, K., Morgan, E. J., Nolte, S., Powers,
J. G., Rainwater, B., Randolph, K., Reeves, M., Schauffler, S. M., Smith,
K., Smith, M., Stith, J., Stossmeister, G., Toohey, D. W., and Watt, A. S.:
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ratio and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Airborne Southern Ocean Study, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 99, 381–402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0206.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0206.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stephens, G. and Webster, P.: Clouds and climate: Sensitivity of simple
systems, J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 235–247, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Storelvmo, T. and Herger, N.: Cirrus cloud susceptibility to the injection
of ice nuclei in the upper troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 119,
2375–2389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020816" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020816</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tan, X., Huang, Y., Diao, M., Bansemer, A., Zondlo, M. A., DiGangi, J. P.,
Volkamer, R., and Hu, Y.: An assessment of the radiative effects of ice
supersaturation based on in situ observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43,
11039–11047, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071144" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL071144</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thorsen, T. J., Fu, Q., Comstock, J. M., Sivaraman, C., Vaughan, M. A.,
Winker, D. M., and Turner, D. D.: Macrophysical properties of tropical
cirrus clouds from the CALIPSO satellite and from ground-based micropulse
and Raman lidars, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 9209–9220,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50691" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50691</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tseng, H.-H. and Fu, Q.: Temperature control of the variability of tropical
tropopause layer cirrus clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11062–11075, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD027093</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Vertical Cavity Surface
Emitting Laser Hygrometer (VCSEL), Version 1.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing
Laboratory, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6Z31X06" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6Z31X06</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data (NetCDF),
Version 3.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6BC3WKB" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6BC3WKB</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
1.2, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6TX3CK0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6TX3CK0</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
1.1, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D65T3HWR" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D65T3HWR</ext-link>, 2018c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
2.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6NZ85Z4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6NZ85Z4</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
5.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6JW8C64" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6JW8C64</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
5.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6QF8R6R" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6QF8R6R</ext-link>, 2019c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
3.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6V40SK6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6V40SK6</ext-link>, 2019d.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
3.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6CZ35HX" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6CZ35HX</ext-link>, 2019e.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
2.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D61R6NV5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D61R6NV5</ext-link>, 2019f.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1859?><ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
3.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6668BHR" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6668BHR</ext-link>, 2019g.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Baidar, S., Campos, T. L., Coburn, S., DiGangi, J. P., Dix, B., Eloranta, E. W., Koenig, T. K., Morley, B., Ortega, I., Pierce, B. R., Reeves, M., Sinreich, R., Wang, S., Zondlo, M. A., and Romashkin, P. A.: Aircraft measurements of BrO, IO, glyoxal, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerosol extinction profiles in the tropics: comparison with aircraft-/ship-based in situ and lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2121–2148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, M. and Penner, J. E.: Cirrus clouds in a global climate model with a statistical cirrus cloud scheme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5449–5474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5449-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5449-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Liu, X., Zhang, K., and Comstock, J. M.: Aerosol effects on cirrus
through ice nucleation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 with a
statistical cirrus scheme, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 6, 513–526,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014MS000339</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Liu, X., Hoose, C., and Wang, B.: Different contact angle distributions for heterogeneous ice nucleation in the Community Atmospheric Model version 5, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10411–10430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10411-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10411-2014</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wofsy, S. C.: HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO): Fine-grained,
global-scale measurements of climatically important atmospheric gases and
aerosols, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 369,
2073–2086, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0313" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2010.0313</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wolf, V., Kuhn, T., Milz, M., Voelger, P., Krämer, M., and Rolf, C.: Arctic ice clouds over northern Sweden: microphysical properties studied with the Balloon-borne Ice Cloud particle Imager B-ICI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17371–17386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17371-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17371-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, C., Liu, X., Diao, M., Zhang, K., Gettelman, A., Lu, Z., Penner, J. E., and Lin, Z.: Direct comparisons of ice cloud macro- and microphysical properties simulated by the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 with HIPPO aircraft observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4731–4749, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4731-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4731-2017</ext-link>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, G. J. and McFarlane, N. A.: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the
parameterization of cumulus convection in the canadian climate centre
general circulation model, Atmos.-Ocean, 33, 407–446,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1995.9649539" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/07055900.1995.9649539</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, K., Liu, X., Wang, M., Comstock, J. M., Mitchell, D. L., Mishra, S., and Mace, G. G.: Evaluating and constraining ice cloud parameterizations in CAM5 using aircraft measurements from the SPARTICUS campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4963–4982, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4963-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4963-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., MacKe, A., and Albers, F.: Effect of crystal size spectrum and
crystal shape on stratiform cirrus radiative forcing, Atmos. Res., 52,
59–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(99)00026-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0169-8095(99)00026-5</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, B., Liou, K.-N., Gu, Y., Jiang, J. H., Li, Q., Fu, R., Huang, L., Liu, X., Shi, X., Su, H., and He, C.: Impact of aerosols on ice crystal size, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1065–1078, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1065-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-1065-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, B., Wang, Y., Gu, Y., Liou, K. N., Jiang, J. H., Fan, J., Liu, X., Huang, L., and Yung, Y. L.: Ice nucleation by aerosols from anthropogenic pollution, Nat. Geosci., 12, 602–607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0389-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-019-0389-4</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, C., Penner, J. E., Lin, G., Liu, X., and Wang, M.: What controls the low ice number concentration in the upper troposphere?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12411–12424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12411-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12411-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zondlo, M. A., Paige, M. E., Massick, S. M., and Silver, J. A.: Vertical
cavity laser hygrometer for the National Science Foundation Gulfstream-V
aircraft, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, 1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014445" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014445</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Effects of thermodynamics, dynamics and aerosols on cirrus clouds based on in situ observations and NCAR CAM6</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Cirrus cloud radiative effects are largely affected by
ice microphysical properties, including ice water content (IWC), ice crystal
number concentration (<i>N</i><sub>i</sub>) and mean diameter (<i>D</i><sub>i</sub>). These characteristics vary
significantly due to thermodynamic, dynamical and aerosol conditions. In
this work, a global-scale observation dataset is used to examine regional
variations of cirrus cloud microphysical properties, as well as several key
controlling factors, i.e., temperature, relative humidity with respect to
ice (RHi), vertical velocity (<i>w</i>) and aerosol number concentrations (<i>N</i><sub>a</sub>).
Results are compared with simulations from the National Center for
Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Atmosphere Model version 6 (CAM6).
Observed and simulated ice mass and number concentrations are constrained to
 ≥ 62.5&thinsp;µm to reduce potential uncertainty from shattered ice in
data collection. The differences between simulations and observations are
found to vary with latitude and temperature. Comparing with averaged
observations at  ∼ 100&thinsp;km horizontal scale, simulations are
found to underestimate (overestimate) IWC by a factor of 3–10 in the
Northern (Southern) Hemisphere. Simulated <i>N</i><sub>i</sub> is overestimated in most
regions except the Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes. Simulated <i>D</i><sub>i</sub> is
underestimated by a factor of 2, especially for warmer conditions
(−50 to −40&thinsp;°C), possibly due to
misrepresentation of ice particle growth/sedimentation. For RHi effects, the
frequency and magnitude of ice supersaturation are underestimated in
simulations for clear-sky conditions. The simulated IWC and <i>N</i><sub>i</sub> show bimodal
distributions with maximum values at 100&thinsp;% and 80&thinsp;% RHi, differing from
the unimodal distributions that peak at 100&thinsp;% in the observations. For <i>w</i>
effects, both observations and simulations show variances of <i>w</i> (<i>σ</i><sub><i>w</i></sub>) decreasing from the tropics to polar regions, but simulations show much
higher <i>σ</i><sub><i>w</i></sub> for the in-cloud condition than the clear-sky condition.
Compared with observations, simulations show weaker aerosol indirect effects
with a smaller increase of IWC and <i>D</i><sub>i</sub> at higher <i>N</i><sub>a</sub>. These findings provide an
observation-based guideline for improving simulated ice microphysical
properties and their relationships with key controlling factors at various
geographical locations.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Barth, M. C., Cantrell, C. A., Brune, W. H., Rutledge, S. A., Crawford, J.
H., Huntrieser, H., Carey, L. D., MacGorman, D., Weisman, M., Pickering, K.
E., Bruning, E., Anderson, B., Apel, E., Biggerstaff, M., Campos, T.,
Campuzano-Jost, P., Cohen, R., Crounse, J., Day, D. A., Diskin, G., Flocke,
F., Fried, A., Garland, C., Heikes, B., Honomichl, S., Hornbrook, R.,
Gregory Huey, L., Jimenez, J. L., Lang, T., Lichtenstern, M., Mikoviny, T.,
Nault, B., O'Sullivan, D., Pan, L. L., Peischl, J., Pollack, I., Richter,
D., Riemer, D., Ryerson, T., Schlager, H., St. Clair, J., Walega, J.,
Weibring, P., Weinheimer, A., Wennberg, P., Wisthaler, A., Wooldridge, P. J.,
and Ziegler, C.: The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) field
campaign, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1281–1310,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00290.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00290.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bogenschutz, P. A., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Larson, V. E., Craig, C.,
and Schanen, D. P.: Higher-order turbulence closure and its impact on
climate simulations in the community atmosphere model, J. Climate, 26,
9655–9676, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00075.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00075.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S. K., Sherwood, S. C., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Clouds and aerosols,
Clim. Chang. 2013 Phys. Sci. Basis Work. Gr. I Contrib. to Fifth Assess.
Rep. Intergov. Panel Clim. Chang., 9781107057, 571–658,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, P. R. A. and Francis, P. N.: Improved Measurements of the Ice Water
Content in Cirrus Using a Total-Water Probe, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 12,
410–414, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012&lt;0410:IMOTIW&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012&lt;0410:IMOTIW&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chylek, P., Dubey, M. K., Lohmann, U., Ramanathan, V., Kaufman, Y. J.,
Lesins, G., Hudson, J., Altmann, G., and Olsen, S.: Aerosol indirect effect
over the Indian Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06806,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025397" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025397</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J. and Froyd, K. D.: Sampling the composition of cirrus ice
residuals, Atmos. Res., 142, 15–31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.06.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.06.012</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M., Zondlo, M.
A., Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., and Murphy, D. M.: Clarifying the dominant
sources and mechanisms of cirrus cloud formation, Science,
340, 1320–1324, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234145" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234145</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
D'Alessandro, J. J., Diao, M., Wu, C., Liu, X., Chen, M., Morrison, H.,
Eidhammer, T., Jensen, J. B., Bansemer, A., Zondlo, M. A., and DiGangi, J.
P.: Dynamical conditions of ice supersaturation and ice nucleation in
convective systems: A comparative analysis between in situ aircraft
observations and WRF simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 2844–2866,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025994" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025994</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
D'Alessandro, J. J., Diao, M., Wu, C., Liu, X., Jensen, J. B., and Stephens,
B. B.: Cloud phase and relative humidity distributions over the Southern
Ocean in austral summer based on in situ observations and CAM5 simulations,
J. Climate, 32, 2781–2805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0232.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0232.1</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Predicting
global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Heymsfield, A. J., Beaton, S. P., and Rogers, D. C.:
Evolution of ice crystal regions on the microscale based on in situ
observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3473–3478,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50665" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50665</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Heymsfield, A. J., Avallone, L. M., Paige, M. E., Beaton, S. P., Campos, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Cloud-scale ice-supersaturated regions spatially correlate with high water vapor heterogeneities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2639–2656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2639-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2639-2014</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Heymsfield, A. J., and Beaton, S. P.: Hemispheric
comparison of cirrus cloud evolution using in situ measurements in HIAPER
Pole-to-Pole Observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1–8,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059873" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059873</a>, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Diao, M., Jensen, J. B., Pan, L. L., Homeyer, C. R., Honomichl, S., Bresch,
J. F., and Bansemer, A.: Distributions of ice supersaturation and ice
crystals from airborne observations in relation to upper tropospheric
dynamical boundaries, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 5101–5121,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023139</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Diao, M., Bryan, G. H., Morrison, H., and Jensen, J. B.: Ice nucleation
parameterization and relative humidity distribution in idealized squall-line
simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 2761–2787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0356.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0356.1</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Eidhammer, T., Morrison, H., Bansemer, A., Gettelman, A., and Heymsfield, A. J.: Comparison of ice cloud properties simulated by the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5) with in-situ observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10103–10118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10103-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10103-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Eidhammer, T., Morrison, H., Mitchell, D., Gettelman, A., and Erfani, E.:
Improvements in global climate model microphysics using a consistent
representation of ice particle properties, J. Climate, 30, 609–629,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0050.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0050.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs,
L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan,
K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A.,
da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G. K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D.,
Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M.,
Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The modern-era retrospective
analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate,
30, 5419–5454, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Gettelman, A. and Morrison, H.: Advanced two-moment bulk microphysics for
global models. Part I: Off-line tests and comparison with other schemes, J. Climate, 28, 1268–1287, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00102.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00102.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gettelman, A., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., Morrison, H., Park, S., Conley, A. J.,
Klein, S. A., Boyle, J., Mitchell, D. L., and Li, J. L. F.: Global
simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation with an improved cloud
scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115,
1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013797" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013797</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gettelman, A., Bardeen, C. G., McCluskey, C. S., Järvinen, E., Stith, J., Bretherton, C., McFarquhar, G., Twohy, C., D'Alessandro, J., and Wu, W.:  Simulating Observations of Southern Ocean
Clouds and Implications for Climate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032619,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032619" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032619</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Golaz, J. C., Larson, V. E., and Cotton, W. R.: A PDF-Based Model for
Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Method and Model Description, J. Atmos.
Sci., 59, 3540–3551, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Heymsfield, A. J.: Precipitation Development in Stratiform Ice Clouds: A
Microphysical and Dynamical Study, J. Atmos. Sci., 367–381, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Heymsfield, A. J., Winker, D., and van Zadelhoff, G. J.: Extinction-ice water
content-effective radius algorithms for CALIPSO, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
32, 1–4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022742" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022742</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Heymsfield, A. J., Krämer, M., Wood, N. B., Gettelman, A., Field, P. R.,
and Liu, G.: Dependence of the Ice Water Content and Snowfall Rate on
Temperature, Globally: Comparison of in Situ Observations, Satellite Active
Remote Sensing Retrievals, and Global Climate Model Simulations, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Climatol., 56, 189–215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0230.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0230.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J. E., Chen, J. P., and Hazra, A.: A
classical-theory-based parameterization of heterogeneous ice nucleation by
mineral dust, soot, and biological particles in a global climate model, J.
Atmos. Sci., 67, 2483–2503, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3425.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3425.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Jensen, E. J., Toon, O. B., Vay, S. A., Ovarlez, J., May, R., Bui, T. P.,
Twohy, C. H., Gandrud, B. W., Pueschel, R. F., and Schumann, U.: Prevalence
of ice-supersaturated regions in the upper troposphere: Implications for
optically thin ice cloud formation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
17253–17266, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900526" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900526</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Kanitz, T., Seifert, P., Ansmann, A., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D.,
Casiccia, C., and Rohwer, E. G.: Contrasting the impact of aerosols at
northern and southern midlatitudes on heterogeneous ice formation, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 38, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048532" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048532</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kärcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A parameterization of cirrus cloud
formation: Homogeneous freezing of supercooled aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.,
107, D2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000470" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000470</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kärcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A parameterization of cirrus cloud
formation: Heterogeneous freezing, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4402,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003220" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003220</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kärcher, B., Hendricks, J., and Lohmann, U.: Physically based
parameterization of cirrus cloud formation for use in global atmospheric
models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D01205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006219" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006219</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the
determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature,
406, 611–614, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kooperman, G. J., Pritchard, M. S., Ghan, S. J., Wang, M., Somerville, R. C.
J., and Russell, L. M.: Constraining the influence of natural variability to
improve estimates of global aerosol indirect effects in a nudged version of
the Community Atmosphere Model 5, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 1–16,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018588" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018588</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Krämer, M., Schiller, C., Afchine, A., Bauer, R., Gensch, I., Mangold, A., Schlicht, S., Spelten, N., Sitnikov, N., Borrmann, S., de Reus, M., and Spichtinger, P.: Ice supersaturations and cirrus cloud crystal numbers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3505–3522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Afchine, A., Fahey, D., Jensen, E., Khaykin, S., Kuhn, T., Lawson, P., Lykov, A., Pan, L. L., Riese, M., Rollins, A., Stroh, F., Thornberry, T., Wolf, V., Woods, S., Spichtinger, P., Quaas, J., and Sourdeval, O.: A microphysics guide to cirrus – Part 2: Climatologies of clouds and humidity from observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12569–12608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12569-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12569-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kuebbeler, M., Lohmann, U., Hendricks, J., and Kärcher, B.: Dust ice nuclei effects on cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3027–3046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3027-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3027-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, S. J.: A “vertically Lagrangian” finite-volume dynamical core for
global models, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 2293–2307,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132&lt;2293:AVLFDC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132&lt;2293:AVLFDC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X. and Penner, J. E.: Ice nucleation parameterization for global
models, Meteorol. Zeitschrift, 14, 499–514,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0059</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Penner, J. E., Ghan, S. J., and Wang, M.: Inclusion of ice
microphysics in the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model version 3 (CAM3), J. Climate, 20, 4526–4547, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4264.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4264.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Shi, X., Zhang, K., Jensen, E. J., Gettelman, A., Barahona, D., Nenes, A., and Lawson, P.: Sensitivity studies of dust ice nuclei effect on cirrus clouds with the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 12061–12079, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Ma, P.-L., Wang, H., Tilmes, S., Singh, B., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., and Rasch, P. J.: Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 505–522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Luebke, A. E., Avallone, L. M., Schiller, C., Meyer, J., Rolf, C., and Krämer, M.: Ice water content of Arctic, midlatitude, and tropical cirrus – Part 2: Extension of the database and new statistical analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6447–6459, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6447-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6447-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Luebke, A. E., Afchine, A., Costa, A., Grooß, J.-U., Meyer, J., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Avallone, L. M., Baumgardner, D., and Krämer, M.: The origin of midlatitude ice clouds and the resulting influence on their microphysical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5793–5809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5793-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5793-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Mace, G. G. and Wrenn, F. J.: Evaluation of the hydrometeor layers in the
East and West Pacific within ISCCP cloud-top pressure-optical depth bins
using merged CloudSat and CALIPSO data, J. Climate, 26, 9429–9444,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00207.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00207.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Mcfarquhar, G. M. and Heymsfield, A. J.: Parameterization of tropical cirrus
ice crystal size distributions and implications for radiative transfer:
Results from CEPEX, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 2187–2200,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054&lt;2187:POTCIC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054&lt;2187:POTCIC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Minikin, A., Petzold, A., Ström, J., Krejci, R., Seifert, M., van Velthoven, P., Schlager, H., and Schumann, U.: Aircraft observations of the upper tropospheric fine particle aerosol in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres at midlatitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1503, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016458" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016458</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, D. L., Garnier, A., Pelon, J., and Erfani, E.: CALIPSO (IIR–CALIOP) retrievals of cirrus cloud ice-particle concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17325–17354, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17325-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17325-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Montgomery, M. T., Davis, C., Dunkerton, T., Wang, Z., Velden, C., Torn, R.,
Majumdar, S. J., Zhang, F., Smith, R. K., Bosart, L., Bell, M. M., Haase, J.
S., Heymsfield, A., Jensen, J., Campos, T., and Boothe, M. A.: The
pre-depression investigation of cloud-systems in the tropics (PREDICT)
experiment: Scientific basis, new analysis tools, and some first results,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 153–172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00046.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00046.1</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Morrison, H. and Gettelman, A.: A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud
microphysics scheme in the community atmosphere model, version 3 (CAM3).
Part I: Description and numerical tests, J. Climate, 21, 3642–3659,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2105.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2105.1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Muhlbauer, A., Ackerman, T. P., Comstock, J. M., Diskin, G. S., Evans, S.
M., Lawson, R. P., and Marchand, R. T.: Impact of large-scale dynamics on the
microphysical properties of midlatitude cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 119,
3976–3996, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020035</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Muhlbauer, A., Kalesse, H., and Kollias, P.: Vertical velocities and
turbulence in midlatitude anvil cirrus: A comparison between in situ
aircraft measurements and ground-based Doppler cloud radar retrievals,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 7814–7821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062279" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062279</a>, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M. and Koop, T.: Review of the vapour pressures of ice and
supercooled water for atmospheric applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
131, 1539–1565, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.94" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.94</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, L. L., Bowman, K. P., Atlas, E. L., Wofsy, S. C., Zhang, F., Bresch, J.
F., Ridley, B. A., Pittman, J. V., Homeyer, C. R., Romashkin, P., and Cooper,
W. A.: The stratosphere-troposphere analyses of regional transport 2008
experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 327–342,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2865.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2865.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, L. L., Atlas, E. L., Salawitch, R. J., Honomichl, S. B., Bresch, J. F.,
Randel, W. J., Apel, E. C., Hornbrook, R. S., Weinheimer, A. J., Anderson,
D. C., Andrews, S. J., Baidar, S., Beaton, S. P., Campos, T. L., Carpenter,
L. J., Chen, D., Dix, B., Donets, V., Hall, S. R., Hanisco, T. F., Homeyer,
C. R., Huey, L. G., Jensen, J. B., Kaser, L., Kinnison, D. E., Koenig, T.
K., Lamarque, J.-F., Liu, C., Luo, J., Luo, Z. J., Montzka, D. D., Nicely,
J. M., Pierce, R. B., Riemer, D. D., Robinson, T., Romashkin, P.,
Saiz-Lopez, A., Schauffler, S., Shieh, O., Stell, M. H., Ullmann, K.,
Vaughan, G., Volkamer, R., and Wolfe, G.: The Convective Transport of Active
Species in the Tropics (CONTRAST) Experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
98, 106–128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-14-00272.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-14-00272.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Patnaude, R. and Diao, M.: Aerosol indirect effects on cirrus clouds based on global aircraft observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086550, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086550" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086550</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Penner, J. E., Chen, Y., Wang, M., and Liu, X.: Possible influence of anthropogenic aerosols on cirrus clouds and anthropogenic forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 879–896, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-879-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-879-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Penner, J. E., Zhou, C., Garnier, A., and Mitchell, D. L.: Anthropogenic
Aerosol Indirect Effects in Cirrus Clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123,
11652–11677, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029204" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029204</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Prenni, A. J., Petters, M. D., Faulhaber, A., Carriço, C. M., Ziemann,
P. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., and DeMott, P. J.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation
measurements of secondary organic aerosol generated from ozonolysis of
alkenes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036957" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036957</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Righi, M., Hendricks, J., Lohmann, U., Beer, C. G., Hahn, V., Heinold, B., Heller, R., Krämer, M., Ponater, M., Rolf, C., Tegen, I., and Voigt, C.: Coupling aerosols to (cirrus) clouds in the global EMAC-MADE3 aerosol–climate model, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1635–1661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1635-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1635-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Sassen, K., Wang, Z., and Liu, D.: Global distribution of cirrus clouds from
CloudSat/cloud-aerosol lidar and infrared pathfinder satellite observations
(CALIPSO) measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009972" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009972</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Schiller, C., Krämer, M., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., and Sitnikov, N.: Ice
water content of Arctic, midlatitude, and tropical cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010342" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010342</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Shi, X. and Liu, X.: Effect of cloud-scale vertical velocity on the
contribution of homogeneous nucleation to cirrus formation and radiative
forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 6588–6595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069531" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069531</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Shi, X., Liu, X., and Zhang, K.: Effects of pre-existing ice crystals on cirrus clouds and comparison between different ice nucleation parameterizations with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1503–1520, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1503-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1503-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Stephens, B. B., Long, M. C., Keeling, R. F., Kort, E. A., Sweeney, C.,
Apel, E. C., Atlas, E. L., Beaton, S., Bent, J. D., Blake, N. J., Bresch, J.
F., Casey, J., Daube, B. C., Diao, M., Diaz, E., Dierssen, H., Donets, V.,
Gao, B.-C., Gierach, M., Green, R., Haag, J., Hayman, M., Hills, A. J.,
Hoecker-Martínez, M. S., Honomichl, S. B., Hornbrook, R. S., Jensen, J.
B., Li, R.-R., McCubbin, I., McKain, K., Morgan, E. J., Nolte, S., Powers,
J. G., Rainwater, B., Randolph, K., Reeves, M., Schauffler, S. M., Smith,
K., Smith, M., Stith, J., Stossmeister, G., Toohey, D. W., and Watt, A. S.:
The O<sub>2</sub>∕N<sub>2</sub> Ratio and CO<sub>2</sub> Airborne Southern Ocean Study, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 99, 381–402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0206.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0206.1</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Stephens, G. and Webster, P.: Clouds and climate: Sensitivity of simple
systems, J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 235–247, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Storelvmo, T. and Herger, N.: Cirrus cloud susceptibility to the injection
of ice nuclei in the upper troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 119,
2375–2389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020816" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020816</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, X., Huang, Y., Diao, M., Bansemer, A., Zondlo, M. A., DiGangi, J. P.,
Volkamer, R., and Hu, Y.: An assessment of the radiative effects of ice
supersaturation based on in situ observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43,
11039–11047, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071144" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071144</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Thorsen, T. J., Fu, Q., Comstock, J. M., Sivaraman, C., Vaughan, M. A.,
Winker, D. M., and Turner, D. D.: Macrophysical properties of tropical
cirrus clouds from the CALIPSO satellite and from ground-based micropulse
and Raman lidars, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 9209–9220,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50691" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50691</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Tseng, H.-H. and Fu, Q.: Temperature control of the variability of tropical
tropopause layer cirrus clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11062–11075, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027093</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Vertical Cavity Surface
Emitting Laser Hygrometer (VCSEL), Version 1.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing
Laboratory, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6Z31X06" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6Z31X06</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data (NetCDF),
Version 3.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6BC3WKB" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6BC3WKB</a>, 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
1.2, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6TX3CK0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6TX3CK0</a>, 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
1.1, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D65T3HWR" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D65T3HWR</a>, 2018c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
2.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6NZ85Z4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6NZ85Z4</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
5.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6JW8C64" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6JW8C64</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
5.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6QF8R6R" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6QF8R6R</a>, 2019c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
3.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6V40SK6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6V40SK6</a>, 2019d.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
3.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6CZ35HX" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6CZ35HX</a>, 2019e.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
2.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D61R6NV5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D61R6NV5</a>, 2019f.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps)
Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version
3.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6668BHR" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6668BHR</a>, 2019g.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Volkamer, R., Baidar, S., Campos, T. L., Coburn, S., DiGangi, J. P., Dix, B., Eloranta, E. W., Koenig, T. K., Morley, B., Ortega, I., Pierce, B. R., Reeves, M., Sinreich, R., Wang, S., Zondlo, M. A., and Romashkin, P. A.: Aircraft measurements of BrO, IO, glyoxal, NO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>O, O<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>2</sub> and aerosol extinction profiles in the tropics: comparison with aircraft-/ship-based in situ and lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2121–2148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, M. and Penner, J. E.: Cirrus clouds in a global climate model with a statistical cirrus cloud scheme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5449–5474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5449-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5449-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, M., Liu, X., Zhang, K., and Comstock, J. M.: Aerosol effects on cirrus
through ice nucleation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 with a
statistical cirrus scheme, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 6, 513–526,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000339</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Liu, X., Hoose, C., and Wang, B.: Different contact angle distributions for heterogeneous ice nucleation in the Community Atmospheric Model version 5, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10411–10430, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10411-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10411-2014</a>, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Wofsy, S. C.: HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO): Fine-grained,
global-scale measurements of climatically important atmospheric gases and
aerosols, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 369,
2073–2086, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0313" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0313</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Wolf, V., Kuhn, T., Milz, M., Voelger, P., Krämer, M., and Rolf, C.: Arctic ice clouds over northern Sweden: microphysical properties studied with the Balloon-borne Ice Cloud particle Imager B-ICI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17371–17386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17371-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17371-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, C., Liu, X., Diao, M., Zhang, K., Gettelman, A., Lu, Z., Penner, J. E., and Lin, Z.: Direct comparisons of ice cloud macro- and microphysical properties simulated by the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 with HIPPO aircraft observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4731–4749, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4731-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4731-2017</a>, 2017.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, G. J. and McFarlane, N. A.: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the
parameterization of cumulus convection in the canadian climate centre
general circulation model, Atmos.-Ocean, 33, 407–446,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1995.9649539" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1995.9649539</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, K., Liu, X., Wang, M., Comstock, J. M., Mitchell, D. L., Mishra, S., and Mace, G. G.: Evaluating and constraining ice cloud parameterizations in CAM5 using aircraft measurements from the SPARTICUS campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4963–4982, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4963-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4963-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., MacKe, A., and Albers, F.: Effect of crystal size spectrum and
crystal shape on stratiform cirrus radiative forcing, Atmos. Res., 52,
59–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(99)00026-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(99)00026-5</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, B., Liou, K.-N., Gu, Y., Jiang, J. H., Li, Q., Fu, R., Huang, L., Liu, X., Shi, X., Su, H., and He, C.: Impact of aerosols on ice crystal size, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1065–1078, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1065-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1065-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, B., Wang, Y., Gu, Y., Liou, K. N., Jiang, J. H., Fan, J., Liu, X., Huang, L., and Yung, Y. L.: Ice nucleation by aerosols from anthropogenic pollution, Nat. Geosci., 12, 602–607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0389-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0389-4</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, C., Penner, J. E., Lin, G., Liu, X., and Wang, M.: What controls the low ice number concentration in the upper troposphere?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12411–12424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12411-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12411-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Zondlo, M. A., Paige, M. E., Massick, S. M., and Silver, J. A.: Vertical
cavity laser hygrometer for the National Science Foundation Gulfstream-V
aircraft, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, 1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014445" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014445</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
