<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-18247-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Modeling secondary organic aerosol formation<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> from volatile chemical
products</article-title><alt-title>Modeling secondary organic aerosol formation</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Modeling secondary organic aerosol formation}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{E.~A.~Pennington et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Pennington</surname><given-names>Elyse A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1736-2342</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Seltzer</surname><given-names>Karl M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Murphy</surname><given-names>Benjamin N.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3542-5378</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>Momei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2583-6878</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Seinfeld</surname><given-names>John H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1344-4068</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Pye</surname><given-names>Havala O. T.</given-names></name>
          <email>pye.havala@epa.gov</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2014-2140</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Office of Research and Development, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>US Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of
Technology,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Pasadena, CA 91125, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection
Agency,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and
Pollution Control, Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric
Environment and Equipment Technology, School of Environmental Science and
Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science &amp; Technology,
Nanjing, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Havala O. T. Pye (pye.havala@epa.gov)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>24</issue>
      <fpage>18247</fpage><lpage>18261</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>1</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e156">Volatile chemical products (VCPs) are commonly used
consumer and industrial items that are an important source of anthropogenic
emissions. Organic compounds from VCPs evaporate on atmospherically relevant
timescales and include many species that are secondary organic aerosol
(SOA) precursors. However, the chemistry leading to SOA, particularly that
of intermediate-volatility organic compounds (IVOCs), has not been fully
represented in regional-scale models such as the Community Multiscale Air
Quality (CMAQ) model, which tend to underpredict SOA concentrations in urban
areas. Here we develop a model to represent SOA formation from VCP
emissions. The model incorporates a new VCP emissions inventory and employs
three new classes of emissions: siloxanes, oxygenated IVOCs, and
nonoxygenated IVOCs. VCPs are estimated to produce 1.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of noontime SOA, doubling the current model predictions and reducing the SOA mass concentration bias from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>75 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>58 % when compared to
observations in Los Angeles in 2010. While oxygenated and nonoxygenated
intermediate-volatility VCP species are emitted in similar quantities, SOA
formation is dominated by the nonoxygenated IVOCs. Formaldehyde and SOA show
similar relationships to temperature and bias signatures, indicating common
sources and/or chemistry. This work suggests that VCPs contribute up to half
of anthropogenic SOA in Los Angeles and models must better represent SOA
precursors from VCPs to predict the urban enhancement of SOA.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e202">Organic aerosol (OA) is a major component of fine particulate matter
(PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in urban areas throughout the world (Zhang et al., 2007). PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> influences human health (Lim et al., 2012), climate (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014), and visibility (Hyslop,
2009), so understanding OA composition is an important step in mitigating
the adverse effects of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) is often
the dominant component of OA (Jimenez et al., 2009) and is formed when gas-phase volatile organic compounds (VOCs) react with atmospheric oxidants to form products that condense into the aerosol phase, where they can undergo further reaction. SOA is formed via thousands of atmospheric reactions (Goldstein and Galbally, 2007), so understanding its sources remains a challenge.</p>
      <p id="d1e232">Volatile chemical products (VCPs) are an important source of organic
emissions that lead to SOA formation (McDonald<?pagebreak page18248?> et al., 2018; Qin et al., 2021). As vehicle exhaust becomes cleaner and mobile source emissions decline, the relative importance of VCP emissions increases (Khare and Gentner, 2018). Previous work suggests that during the 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) campaign in southern California (Ryerson et al., 2013), VCPs contributed approximately 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, or 41 %, of observed SOA above background levels in the Los Angeles Basin (Qin et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e255">Modeling the formation of SOA in three-dimensional (3D) chemical transport
models (CTMs) is challenging due to the complexity of VOC chemistry and
computational constraints of regional-scale modeling. Models have tended to
underpredict SOA mass in urban locations for a variety of reasons. For one,
the SOA formation potential of intermediate-volatility organic compounds
(IVOCs) and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) – or S/IVOCs – is not
well constrained. Observations made during the CalNex campaign demonstrate
that S/IVOCs are important sources of SOA, making up 10 % of total
gas-phase organic compound concentrations (Zhao et al., 2014) while
contributing up to 80 % of above-background SOA mass (Hayes
et al., 2015). Although it is often impossible to identify all individual
species contributing to ambient S/IVOCs, these compounds may be classified
based on their properties (e.g., volatility). Volatility basis set (VBS)
models (Donahue et al., 2011) are often used to represent S/IVOC chemistry and partitioning and have improved model estimates of SOA (Woody et al., 2016; Hayes et al., 2015; Robinson et al., 2007). Murphy
et al. (2017) integrated a VBS model into the Community Multiscale Air
Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.2 to represent the multigenerational aging of
semivolatile primary organic aerosol (POA) leading to the production of SOA.
Other studies have parameterized VBS models to represent S/IVOCs from mobile
emissions (Lu et al., 2020; Jathar et al., 2017), but none have parameterized SOA formation from VCP S/IVOC emissions. Additionally, the emissions of S/IVOCs are not well constrained and are often not included in detailed emissions inventories (Zhao et al., 2015). However
even when S/IVOCs are included in emissions inventories, they are often
assigned to nonreactive or nonvolatile model surrogates that do not
participate in model chemistry (Shah et al., 2020b). Improving
the representation of SOA chemistry in CMAQ will allow for more accurate
exposure estimates in health studies and source apportionment for air
quality management decisions.</p>
      <p id="d1e258">Another source of error in CTMs is the lack of representation of oxygenated
SOA precursors. Historically, mechanism development has focused on the
oxidation chemistry of species emitted primarily from vehicles (e.g., BTEX – benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene) or biogenic sources (e.g., isoprene, monoterpenes). While VCPs do emit some of these species, they also
emit many oxygenated compounds (Seltzer et al., 2021; McDonald et al., 2018). The implications of a few important oxygenated precursors for air quality have recently been quantified (e.g., Janechek et al., 2017; Charan et al., 2020; Li and Cocker, 2018; Li et al., 2018), but many oxygenated precursors have not been studied in a laboratory setting. For the few oxygenated VCPs that have been studied in laboratory chambers, SOA yields were reported under unrealistic atmospheric conditions, e.g., high OH
and aerosol seed concentrations (Charan et al., 2021). So, the SOA yields of these compounds have primarily been estimated using models such as the Statistical Oxidation Model (SOM; Cappa and Wilson, 2012) or VBS (McDonald et al., 2018; Shah et al., 2020a). These oxygenated species are not included as SOA precursors in most models, and their chemistry is needed to improve predictions of SOA mass.</p>
      <p id="d1e262">In this work, we introduce a chemical mechanism to represent SOA formation
from VCPs. Specifically, the potential of both oxygenated and nonoxygenated
IVOCs to form SOA is developed and evaluated. We utilize a new VCP emissions
inventory known as VCPy (Seltzer et al., 2021) to represent organic emissions from VCPs and to parameterize model species behavior in the chemical mechanism. The chemistry and emissions inventory are implemented in the CMAQ model version 5.3.2 to simulate air quality during the CalNex campaign in California in 2010. The model predictions are compared to measurements made in Pasadena during CalNex, and the speciation of predicted SOA is examined.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>VCPy emissions inventory implementation</title>
      <p id="d1e280">VCPy is a modeling framework that estimates reactive organic carbon
emissions from VCPs (Seltzer et al., 2021). Within this framework, the complete VCP sector is disaggregated into several product use categories (PUCs; e.g., cleaning products, personal care products, adhesives and sealants, paints and coatings). US nationwide usage of each PUC is estimated, and survey data are then used to quantify the mass fraction of organic, inorganic, and water proportions, as well as to speciate the organic fraction. Physiochemical properties of each organic component are used to estimate the characteristic evaporation timescale, which is then compared to an assigned use timescale to determine whether a compound is retained or evaporated from each PUC. In the initial implementation of VCPy (version 1.0), which is representative of 2016 conditions, the predicted nationwide and Los Angeles County VCP emission rates were 9.5 and 8.2 kg per person per year, respectively. These emission rates are consistent
with the low end of values seen in a previous study that used a top-down
approach to estimate VCP emissions (Qin et al., 2021). In our work,
product use is based on data from 2010 with composition specified using data
from the early 2000s to overlap with the CalNex campaign.</p>
      <p id="d1e283">Since the speciation of organic emissions from VCPy is explicit, the
underlying chemical and physical properties of emissions are output from the
framework. These properties,<?pagebreak page18249?> many of which are relevant to atmospheric
oxidation and subsequent SOA formation, include the oxidation rate with the
hydroxyl radical (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), molecular weight (MW), effective saturation concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and oxygen-to-carbon ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). SOA mass yields, which are defined as the mass of SOA formed per mass of VOC precursor reacted, were assigned based on compound-specific structure and volatility (Seltzer et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e320">A key step in implementing this inventory into CMAQ is ensuring that all
compounds predicted to be emitted by VCPy are mapped to either an existing
or a new model surrogate. Emissions of low-volatility organic vapors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from all sources are prime SOA precursors but traditionally discarded from the gas-phase chemical mechanism used in many CTMs (e.g., represented as nonvolatile (NVOL), nonreactive (NROG), or unspecified IVOC species that are not used in the chemical mechanism of CMAQ). As a result, these species do not participate in
atmospheric chemistry and thus do not impact radical concentrations or SOA
mass. In addition, oxygenated compounds are not currently included as SOA
precursors in many mechanisms because of the historic focus on SOA formation
from nonoxygenated vehicle exhaust and traditional VOCs like single-ring
aromatics and biogenic hydrocarbons. The work of Qin et al. (2021) specifically identifies this loss of emitted reactive carbon mass as a reason for underestimated SOA from the personal care sector in the CMAQ model. To
account for the SOA potential of this previously neglected organic mass, all
compounds currently mapped to NROG, NVOL, and IVOC are reviewed, with most
of this mass routed to one of three newly added categories of model
surrogates: siloxanes (SILOX), oxygenated IVOCs (SOAOXY), or nonoxygenated
IVOCs (IVOCP3, IVOCP4, IVOCP5, IVOCP6, IVOCP5ARO, and IVOCP6ARO). The
updated mechanism (with SOA pathways described in Sect. 2.2) with the
newly implemented speciation mapping is henceforth described as
SAPRC07TIC_AE7I_VCP, and the complete list of
assignment rules is provided in the Methods section of the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e364">County-level VCPy emissions (Seltzer et al., 2021) were gridded at a 4 km scale to fit the CalNex domain (Baker et al., 2015) using a variety of spatial surrogates. The spatial surrogates used depend on the category of VCP emissions being described: agricultural land is used as a proxy for all agricultural pesticide emissions, the density of oil and gas wells for the oil and gas solvent emissions, and population for all remaining VCP sources. While some categories of VCP emissions could feature more refined spatial surrogate proxies, the uncertainty associated with spatial allocation of sources may be lower than uncertainty in individual source strength. More specifically, if an entire VCP category could be matched to a single surrogate, allocation methods would still assume there is no variation in the strength of individuals within the population of that surrogate (Li et al.,
2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e368">All VCP emissions feature a sinusoidal diurnal profile with a peak at noon,
with no application of day-of-week or seasonal profiles. Since the
simulation period used in this study is a single month, no seasonal changes
would be observable over this time frame, and previous work suggests little
seasonal variability in VCP emissions (Gkatzelis et al., 2021).
Other emission sectors (e.g., mobile sources, agriculture) are adjusted for
seasonal impacts based on meteorological conditions and known activity data.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Parameterizing SOA formation from VCPs</title>
      <p id="d1e379">To better represent the atmospheric chemistry of VCPs, SOA formation is
added for the three new categories of emissions (siloxanes, oxygenated
IVOCs, and nonoxygenated IVOCs) in the SAPRC07TIC_AE7I_VCP chemical mechanism within CMAQ (Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e385">Properties of the VCP surrogates added to CMAQ version 5.3.2.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.87}[.87]?><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">k<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SOA mass yield</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(at 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(kJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SILOX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">368.66<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.155<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SVSILOX1, ASILOX1J</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">416.66<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.95<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">131<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SVSILOX2, ASILOX2J</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">384.66<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.82<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">484<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">101<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.99</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOAOXY<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">170.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AOIVOCJ<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">186.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0628</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IVOCP3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">296.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IVOCP4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">254.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IVOCP5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">219.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IVOCP6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">184.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IVOCP5ARO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">197.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IVOCP6ARO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">162.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.87}[.87]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e388"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The gas-phase siloxane (SILOX) MW is the average of the MW of all VCPy siloxane and silane species weighted by Los Angeles County emission rates.
The MW of the higher-volatility siloxane products (SVSILOX2, ASILOX2J) is
approximated as the sum of the MW of SILOX and one oxygen. The MW of the
lower-volatility products (SVSILOX1, ASILOX1J) has an additional two oxygens
to represent its significant decrease in volatility.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The gas-phase siloxane (SILOX) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given in Janechek et al. (2017).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The stoichiometric product yields (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
siloxanes are given in Janechek et al. (2019).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Enthalpy of vaporization (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values for the siloxanes are
estimated according to the method in Epstein et al. (2010).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> All <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and hygroscopicity parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are estimated using Eqs. (5) and (12), respectively, in Pye et al. (2017).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Henry's law constants (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 298.15 K are estimated using the
surrogate-based method in Hodzic et al. (2014).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The MW, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SOA yield of SOAOXY (gas) and AOIVOCJ (aerosol) are calculated as a mass-weighted average of the oxygenated IVOC
emissions from VCPs in Los Angeles County. Because AOIVOC is formed via a
single reaction with a constant SOA yield, it is treated as nonvolatile and
therefore is not assigned a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> All nonoxygenated IVOC surrogate properties – including four
stoichiometric product yields (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each surrogate used in
the multigenerational scheme – are described in Lu et al. (2020).</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1669">Cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes (cVMSs), or siloxanes for short, are present
in many personal care products, adhesives, and sealants. Collectively,
siloxanes represent a large fraction of VCP emissions (Seltzer et al., 2021). Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> siloxane) is the most
prevalent siloxane in urban atmospheres (Wang et al., 2013), and laboratory studies have found D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-siloxane SOA yields ranging from 0 % (Charan et al., 2021) to 50 % (Janechek et al., 2019). The
explicit oxidation mechanism is unknown, and the SOA yields of other
siloxanes are not well understood (Coggon et al., 2018). Here,
siloxanes are treated separately from other oxygenated VCP species due to
their anomalously low OH oxidation rate (Table 1).
The mechanism of SOA formation used here utilizes an existing two-product
model from Janechek et al. (2019) that was parameterized using oxidation flow reactor (OFR) experiments and photooxidation chamber data from Wu and Johnston (2017). In this implementation, the OH oxidation rate constant for
D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> siloxane matches the rate reported in Janechek et al. (2017), and the hydroxyl radical is replenished after reaction.</p>
      <p id="d1e1700">Few laboratory chamber studies have investigated the oxidation processes of
other oxygenated gas-phase species (e.g., Charan et al., 2020; Li and Cocker, 2018), so few experimental data exist about the SOA yields or oxidation products of oxygenated SOA precursors. Additionally, many models that predict the products of oxidation reactions (e.g., SOM and VBS) have not been
parameterized or evaluated using oxygenated precursors. Without these models
and laboratory studies, little is known about the oxidation products of
these precursors, which limits our ability to develop a detailed model of
their SOA formation. Therefore, all non-siloxane oxygenated IVOC emissions
are represented by a single surrogate (SOAOXY) that undergoes a one-step
gas-phase reaction with the hydroxyl radical to form a nonvolatile aerosol
surrogate (AOIVOC). This simple mechanism reduces the reliance on many
parameters that are not well constrained. The MW, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SOA yield of this surrogate are calculated as a mass-weighted average of the
oxygenated IVOC<?pagebreak page18250?> emissions from VCPs in Los Angeles County, which are
generally consistent with what would be calculated using nationwide
information.</p>
      <p id="d1e1725">Nonoxygenated IVOC emissions are represented using the model described by Lu et al. (2020), which uses a VBS model and multigenerational aging scheme to
represent the SOA from gasoline, diesel, and aircraft sources. Six
surrogates are differentiated by structure (alkane vs. aromatic) and
effective saturation concentration, and each is assigned a four-product
yield distribution, generating SVOCs after one oxidation step. Many of the
nonoxygenated IVOC species from mobile and VCP emission sources have similar
structures (i.e., long and branched alkanes and aromatics), volatilities, and
SOA yields (see Fig. S1 in the Supplement), making the Lu et al. (2020) model a good representation of oxidation and SOA formation from nonoxygenated VCP IVOCs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>CMAQ model implementation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>CalNex model configuration</title>
      <p id="d1e1743">The updated chemical mechanism and VCPy-derived emissions were implemented
in CMAQ version 5.3.2 (U.S. EPA, 2020). CMAQ version 5.3 and the subsequent minor releases are documented in Appel et al. (2021). The model was used to simulate air quality during the CalNex campaign from 15 May to 15 June 2010, with an additional 14 d spin-up period. Outside the VCP updates, the model configuration matches the implementation used in Qin et al. (2021) and Lu et al. (2020). The model domain has 4 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 km horizontal resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">325</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">225</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cells) covering California and Nevada with 36 vertical levels reaching 50 mbar. Meteorological inputs are derived from the Weather
Research and Forecasting (WRF) Advanced Research WRF core model version 3.8.1 (Skamarock et al., 2008). Gas-phase chemistry is
represented using SAPRC07TIC (Pye et al., 2013; Xie et al., 2013)
with the addition of the VCP chemical mechanism summarized in
Table 1. Aerosol-phase chemistry is simulated using
an extended version of the AERO7 mechanism, depicted in
Fig. 1, which includes all AERO7 reactions plus those
of the new VCP mechanism (boxed in red) and mobile IVOCs (boxed in red in
the lower left) that participate in the multigenerational aging shown in the
orange boxes (Lu et al., 2020). This diagram also includes a representation of the aqueous-phase cloud chemistry and removal used in the Asymmetric Convection Model (ACM)
version 2 module (Binkowski and Roselle, 2003), which has been updated to include wet deposition properties for the
new aerosol surrogates (Table 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1767">Treatment of OA chemistry in the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP model. The thick black box surrounds all aerosol-phase species. All smaller black boxes
depict species undergoing gas-phase oxidation from VOCs to semivolatile or
nonvolatile SOA species. Orange font depicts the VBS model for S/IVOCs. Red
font depicts particle-phase accretion reactions, and purple font depicts
particle-phase hydrolysis reactions. Green font represents heterogeneous
processes. Blue font shows cloud-processed aerosol, and yellow font shows
aerosol water associated with the organic phase. Gray boxes are nonvolatile
primary organic aerosol (POA) species. Double-headed arrows represent
reversible processes, and single-headed arrows represent irreversible processes.
Dashed lines represent processes that are dependent on relative humidity.
The diagram includes the AERO7 mechanism plus the three VCP-forming pathways
specific to this work (thick boxes in red). See U.S. EPA (2016) for species
descriptions.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/18247/2021/acp-21-18247-2021-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1783">All non-VCP anthropogenic emissions are based on the 2011 National Emissions
Inventory (NEI) version 2 (U.S. EPA, 2015). VCP emissions in the
NEI are removed and replaced with VCPy-predicted emissions using the
Detailed Emissions Scaling, Isolation, and Diagnostic (DESID) module (Murphy et al., 2021). Mobile NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions were reduced by 25 % in all simulations to better match observational data from the CalNex campaign (Qin et al., 2021). Mobile IVOC
emissions and the semivolatile treatment of mobile POA were treated
according to the methods described in Lu et al. (2020). The IVOCs are assigned to the appropriate IVOCP3, IVOCP4, IVOCP5, IVOCP6, IVOCP5ARO, and IVOCP6ARO
surrogates that are also used to treat nonoxygenated IVOCs from VCPs.
Wind-blown dust emissions are neglected in this study. Biogenic emissions
are calculated online using the Biogenic Emission Inventory System (BEIS)
version 3.6.1 (Bash et al., 2016) as are sea spray aerosol emissions.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page18251?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Simulation cases</title>
      <p id="d1e1803">Three simulations were evaluated against the observations collected during
the CalNex campaign. A “zero VCP” case removes all VCP emissions. The
“CMAQv5.3.2” case is a standard CMAQ simulation with base emissions (i.e., VCP emissions from the NEI) and base chemistry (i.e., no new VCP chemistry).
Finally, the “CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP” case both adds the VCP chemistry described above (i.e., SAPRC07TIC_AE7I_VCP) and replaces
all NEI VCP emissions with VCPy-derived VCP emissions. Comparisons between
the zero VCP case and the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case illustrate the
complete impact of VCPy emissions on modeled SOA. In contrast, comparisons
between the CMAQv5.3.2 case and the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case illustrate the impact of the new representation of VCP emissions and chemistry against the current status of VCPs in CMAQ. Results from the CMAQv5.3.2 case are presented primarily in the Supplement.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>2.3.3</label><title>Comparison with observations</title>
      <p id="d1e1836">Observational data are provided by a suite of instruments deployed during
the 2010 CalNex campaign in Pasadena. There were two data collection sites
in the CalNex campaign – Pasadena and Bakersfield – and model predictions
are compared to measurements made at the Pasadena site, which is located in
the Los Angeles Basin approximately 18 km downwind of the urban core (Ryerson et al., 2013). PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (fine particulate matter with diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) OA data were obtained with an aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) and have been analyzed via positive matrix factorization (PMF) to determine their composition (Hayes et al., 2013). Formaldehyde (HCHO) data are provided in Warneke et al. (2011) and
carbon monoxide (CO) data are available from Santoni et al. (2014). Ozone data throughout California were obtained from the EPA
AQS monitoring network for 178 sites operating during the simulation period (U.S. EPA, 2013). Hourly ozone concentrations were used to
calculate daily maximum 8 h average (MDA8) ozone concentrations.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page18252?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>VCP emissions and implications for SOA</title>
      <p id="d1e1884">VCP emissions were split almost equally between species that do and do not
form SOA. The SAPRC07TIC_AE7I_VCP speciation mapping (Fig. 2) indicates 56.4 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of Los Angeles County VCP emitted mass does not form SOA. This mass includes small species commonly used as solvents, such as ethanol, acetone, and small alkanes. The remaining 43.6 % (3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of Los Angeles County emissions are assigned to model surrogates that form SOA. Of the total emissions, 3.5 % are assigned to siloxanes; 7.8 % to oxygenated IVOCs; 11.8 % to nonoxygenated IVOCs; and 20.4 % to traditional SOA precursors, such as VOC alkanes, toluene, and other aromatics. The volatility and SOA yields of species in each category are summarized in Fig. S1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1944">Percentage of the VCP emissions assigned to each category of CMAQ
surrogates using the SAPRC07TIC_AE7I_VCP speciation profiles. The total rate of VCP emissions in Los Angeles County is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The outer ring depicts the percentage of
total VCPy-derived emissions assigned to each of the three new VCP
categories (siloxanes in red, oxygenated IVOCs in blue, and nonoxygenated
IVOCs in orange), the traditional SOA precursors described by existing model
surrogates (purple), and existing surrogates that do not form SOA (green).
The inner ring gives an indication of the original assignments of each of
the outer ring categories. Hatching indicates emissions originally assigned
to model surrogates that do not participate in model chemistry: IVOC, NVOL,
and NROG. Solid colors represent other surrogate assignments.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/18247/2021/acp-21-18247-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1980">Figure 2 indicates that in traditional model
processing, precursors to SOA are systematically discarded from chemistry
calculations. As described in Sect. 2.1, low-volatility emissions (i.e., NROG, NVOL, and IVOC) do not participate in SOA or radical chemistry in the
traditional SAPRC07TIC_AE7I mechanism, which is a key issue in
representing SOA mass. The inner ring of Fig. 2 depicts the fraction of each category that was originally assigned to inactive species (NROG, NVOL, and IVOC; hatched) versus other existing surrogates (solid). Of the total
VCP emissions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (30.7 %) was originally assigned to these surrogates and did not
participate in any atmospheric chemistry processes. Using the new speciation
and mechanism, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (21.2 % of total VCP
emissions) was reassigned to surrogates that form SOA in the model (hatched
inner ring – red, blue, orange, and purple). The remaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (9.4 % of total VCP emissions, inner ring hatched green) is comprised of species with SOA yields of zero and was not reassigned to SOA-forming surrogates.</p>
      <p id="d1e2066">Averaged over the duration of the CalNex campaign, VCPs are predicted to be
a larger source of IVOCs than mobile sources, as shown by the increase in
gas-phase IVOC mass in the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case compared to the zero VCP
case (Fig. S2). Across mobile and VCP sources during CalNex, CMAQ predicts
6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of the gas-phase IVOC mass is nonoxygenated and 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of the IVOC mass is oxygenated (Fig. S2). The observed campaign-average total IVOC concentration was 10.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zhao et al., 2014), with 6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> attributed to hydrocarbon-like IVOCs and 4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> attributed to oxygenated IVOCs. However, this observed estimate of
oxygenated IVOCs is conservative (lower bound) based on the experimental
method employed by Zhao et al. (2014). Thus, the predicted nonoxygenated IVOC mass, which includes contributions from both mobile and VCP sources, reproduces observations with high fidelity. CMAQ, which only considers IVOCs from VCP and mobile sectors, underpredicts the mass of oxygenated IVOCs by 38 %, suggesting additional missing products of oxidation or emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2177">The new SOA systems combined with traditional SOA precursors in CMAQ
resulted in an effective SOA yield for the VCP sector – defined as the
emission-weighted average of the individual species' mass-based SOA yields
– of 5.6 % for Los Angeles County. This Los Angeles County yield is in
good agreement with the work of Qin et al. (2021), which found that a
5 % yield led to SOA predictions that were consistent with ambient observational
constraints. The US effective VCP SOA yield (5.3 %) is only slightly
lower than the yield expected for Los Angeles, due to differences stemming
from the variability in the composition of VCP emissions nationwide versus
in Los Angeles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>CMAQ results – SOA, ozone, and formaldehyde</title>
      <?pagebreak page18253?><p id="d1e2188">Modeled PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA increased considerably in response to the newly
implemented VCP emissions and chemistry, bringing model predictions into
closer agreement with observations. Daily maximum PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA
concentrations increased from 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>79 % mean bias) in the zero VCP case to 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>58 % mean bias) in the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case, compared to the observed peak value of 6.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3a). The diurnal distributions
resulted from photochemistry and the sinusoidal distribution of VCP
emissions that peak at 12:00 LT. Modeled PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA concentrations
improved for all mass loadings and all hours of the day, with the slope of
modeled-versus-observed concentrations increasing from 0.23 in the zero VCP
case to 0.43 in the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case (Fig. 4a). Results for the CMAQv5.3.2 case are given in Figs. S3 and S4. Modeled
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA displayed similar behavior to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA; i.e., the organic
fraction and secondary organic fraction of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were only marginally
smaller than the corresponding fractions of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and followed the same
diurnal pattern.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2346"><bold>(a)</bold> Average hourly concentrations of background-corrected PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA observed and simulated by the zero VCP and CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP modeling cases 15 May–15 June. Boxes and whiskers show all hourly concentrations observed by the AMS at the CalNex site. A constant background value was removed from all observed concentrations according to the method in Hayes et al. (2015). The background value of each simulation was determined by averaging the lower 50 % of hourly concentrations from 00:00 to 04:00 LT and subtracting that from each curve. <bold>(b)</bold> Average hourly concentration of total (not size-resolved) SOA for the two simulation cases and their difference (CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP – zero VCP). <bold>(c)</bold> Difference in hourly concentrations of total SOA by category.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/18247/2021/acp-21-18247-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2388">Modeled concentrations predicted by CMAQ zero VCP case (green) and
CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case (blue) vs. observations from the CalNex Pasadena
ground site. The line with a slope of 1 is indicated with a dashed gray
line. <bold>(a)</bold> Hourly PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA. <bold>(b)</bold> Hourly formaldehyde (HCHO). <bold>(c)</bold> MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Background values were not removed from any panels.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/18247/2021/acp-21-18247-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2433">The difference between hourly averaged total (i.e., not size-resolved) SOA
concentrations in the zero VCP and CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP cases is shown in
Fig. 3b, and the contributions to that difference from categories of SOA surrogates are shown in Fig. 3c. Of the three new categories of VCP emissions, nonoxygenated IVOC precursors formed the most SOA in CMAQ. The increased SOA from the nonoxygenated IVOC VCP precursors reached a peak concentration of 1.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, equal to 69 % of the total noontime difference. This can be explained by the high SOA yields of the individual species (Fig. S1) and the model surrogates.</p>
      <p id="d1e2463">SOA from oxygenated IVOC VCP precursors reached a peak concentration of 0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (6.7 % of the SOA difference). While oxygenated IVOC emissions were similar in abundance to nonoxygenated IVOC emissions (Fig. 2), these species lead to less SOA formation
due to their lower SOA yields (Fig. S1); higher degrees of oxygenation tend
to promote fragmentation upon reaction with OH (Jimenez et al., 2009), producing smaller molecules with higher volatilities and lower potential to form SOA. It is possible that the net yield of modeled SOA from oxygenated IVOC precursors will increase as the results from more laboratory studies become available or if a more detailed model is used. For example, particle-phase oligomerization reactions from oxygenated IVOC
precursors would produce nonvolatile aerosol products, but this chemistry
has not yet been investigated in an atmospheric chamber.</p>
      <p id="d1e2486">Siloxanes formed very little SOA, reaching a maximum of 21 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(1.3 % of the SOA difference) at noon. Despite having nonnegligible SOA
yields (Fig. S1) and emission rates (Fig. 2),
siloxanes react with OH on long timescales (Table 1). As such, this results in low localized SOA mass, which is consistent
with other modeling and laboratory studies that have predicted siloxanes to
form SOA on the order of ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or less (Charan et al., 2021; Milani et al., 2021; Janechek et al., 2017). The low resultant SOA mass demonstrates that while gas-phase siloxanes serve as a useful tracer for personal care product and adhesive emissions from VCPs (Gkatzelis et al., 2021),
particle-phase products from siloxane oxidation may not form quickly enough
to serve as a reliable tracer for these emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2513">While traditional species accounted for the greatest fraction of VCP SOA
precursor emissions that lead to SOA formation (Fig. 2), they contributed only 23 % (0.39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the increased noontime SOA in the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case.
These traditional SOA precursors form SOA less efficiently than the IVOC
surrogates (Fig. S1), so they result in less SOA formation than IVOCs
despite higher emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2543">While this work indicates oxygenated IVOCs form much less SOA than
nonoxygenated IVOCs, more work is needed to determine if this result is
robust across all emission sectors and in future conditions. Oxygenated
IVOCs represent a class of emissions that has traditionally been discarded
from regional models but has become an important research focus with the
rising importance of VCP emissions (Khare and Gentner, 2018). The
contribution of oxygenated IVOCs and siloxanes to ambient conditions may be
spatially variable and continue to evolve as product formulations shift
towards exempt VOCs that tend to be oxygenated. Oxygenated IVOCs from other
emission sources, such as meat cooking or wood burning, could be abundant
but were not considered here. Additionally, we do not know if SOA from these
precursors has a health impact higher or lower than that of average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2555">The SOA from VCP IVOCs reached a daily maximum of 1.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average at noon (Fig. 3c). IVOCs from mobile
sources contributed an additional 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at noon (Lu et
al., 2020). Therefore this updated CMAQ model predicted a total IVOC-derived
SOA concentration of 2.35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, equivalent to 35 % of the
total observed above-background PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA concentration (6.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Previous work stated that 40 %–85 % of above-background SOA concentrations in Pasadena are attributable to S/IVOCs (Hayes et al., 2015), suggesting that additional processes are still needed in the model. This will be discussed further in Sect. 3.3.</p>
      <p id="d1e2649">Formaldehyde is one of the most abundant VOCs in the atmosphere, and
observations of this compound can serve many purposes. Biomass burning,
vehicles, and other urban sources emit formaldehyde, and because of its
short lifetime (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> hours), it can serve as a proxy for local
organic emissions. It is also formed in the atmosphere when VOCs undergo
radical reactions, oxidize, and fragment, so it serves as an indicator for
SOA chemistry since it is formed by many of the same reactions that also
lead to SOA formation (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016). In addition,
it is depleted by photolysis and is an important source of radical
initiation reactions (Griffith et al., 2016). Formaldehyde can be retrieved directly by satellites (Levelt et al., 2018), which can be used to
validate ground data, evaluate model predictions, and predict OA
concentrations remotely (Liao et al., 2019). For all of these reasons, formaldehyde is a useful indicator of VOC chemistry in a model.</p>
      <p id="d1e2659">Predicted formaldehyde concentrations improved in response to the new VCP
emissions and chemistry, indicating that model updates improve the
representation of VOC chemistry beyond SOA in the model. Similarly to
predicted SOA, formaldehyde concentrations increased at all times, with the
ratio of modeled-to-observed values increasing from 0.58 in the zero VCP
case to 0.75 in the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case (Fig. 4b). The diurnal profile of hourly averaged formaldehyde concentrations is
given in Fig. S3. This work focused primarily on improving the
representation of SOA from VCPs, so radical chemistry for the new SOA
precursors<?pagebreak page18254?> was treated using existing alkane-like behavior (surrogates
ALK1, ALK2, ALK3, ALK4, ALK5). With a more detailed representation of VCP radical chemistry,
predicted formaldehyde concentrations may improve further.</p>
      <p id="d1e2669">The bias in predicted ozone concentrations was also reduced by including VCP
chemistry. The ratio of modeled-to-observed concentrations increased from
0.72 in the zero VCP case to 0.95 in the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case
(Fig. 4c). Improved ozone is also seen for all
operational AQS sites in the California modeling domain, with the modeled-to-observed ratio increasing from 0.63 in the zero VCP case to 0.70 in the
CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case (Fig. S5). The diurnal profile of hourly averaged
ozone concentrations is given in Fig. S3. This study focused on VCP behavior
in relation to SOA formation and used existing model species to capture
ozone formation. Future work focusing on the ozone chemistry of VCPs could
change the magnitude and diurnal profile of predicted ozone.</p>
      <p id="d1e2686">SOA can be facilitated by increases in oxidant abundance and chemical
pathways from precursors to semivolatile or low-volatility products. Average
noontime total SOA mass increased from 1.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the zero VCP case to 3.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case
(Fig. 3b), an increase of 84.7 %. Ozone concentration can be used as an indicator of oxidant burdens and oxidation rates although OH concentrations may not scale linearly (Qin et al., 2021). The average noontime ozone concentration increased from 43.0 ppb in the zero VCP case to 49.2 ppb in the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case (Fig. S3c), an increase of 14.4 %. Assuming ozone can serve as a proxy for oxidation rates, the improved ozone concentration suggests that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.4 % of increased model SOA concentrations are due to an increase in the oxidant burden and oxidation rates. The SOA mass increased by a larger percentage (84.7 %), indicating emissions and chemistry updates combined were approximately 5 times [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">84.7</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] more effective than enhanced oxidant levels alone in increasing SOA. This is consistent with the work of Qin et al. (2021), which found that the lack of key emitted precursors in models – rather than their associated radical chemistry – had the largest impact on PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. Additionally, we note that the default CMAQ model (CMAQv5.3.2) with baseline chemistry and VCP emissions<?pagebreak page18255?> predicted about the same amount of SOA as the zero VCP case (Fig. S3a). In contrast, ozone increased in the default CMAQv5.3.2 model with VCPs (Fig. S3c). Since the oxidant burden increased noticeably in the CMAQv5.3.2 case but did not equate to a large increase in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA, results suggest the oxidant level alone does not have a large influence on enhancing SOA if the relevant precursor pathways are not also implemented.</p>
      <p id="d1e2800">The response of formaldehyde can similarly be compared to the change in
oxidant burden due to VCPs. At noontime, average formaldehyde increased from
2.41 ppb in the zero VCP case to 2.80 ppb in the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case, an increase of 16.2 %. As above, we attribute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.4 % of the
increase in pollutant concentration to the increase in oxidation rates.
While formaldehyde does contribute to the oxidant burden via photolysis and
radical initiation, the contribution of formaldehyde to the RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical
budget is likely small and on the order of 10 % (e.g., Griffith
et al., 2016; Kaiser et al., 2015; Luecken et al.,
2018). Thus, the increase in formaldehyde concentrations between simulation
cases is likely due primarily to the increase in the oxidation rate. The
increase in formaldehyde between simulation cases, therefore, cannot be
largely attributed to the addition of S/IVOC emissions and their ability to
form formaldehyde as a byproduct of oxidation. This is consistent with the
work of Coggon et al. (2021), which showed that vehicle VOCs perturb formaldehyde to a larger
degree than VCP VOCs do, suggesting that VCP emissions and fragmentation
chemistry may not be directly responsible for formaldehyde but rather
modulate formaldehyde formation via changes in oxidant abundance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Features of remaining model bias</title>
      <p id="d1e2834">The residual PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA bias in Pasadena is well correlated with ambient
temperature (Fig. 5a). PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA bias is
defined as modeled hourly concentrations minus observed hourly
concentrations. At cooler temperatures in the overnight hours, bias is low
and fluctuates around zero. However, as temperature increases towards midday
and SOA concentrations increase, the bias becomes more negative, indicating
greater model underprediction.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2857">Bias (modeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> observed) of hourly concentrations vs. modeled
temperature for the zero VCP case (green) and CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP case (blue).
Hourly concentrations are binned into five temperature ranges of
5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C each, and the data in each bin are represented by a
box-and-whisker plot. The horizontal midline depicts the median of the data;
the edges of the box extend from the lower to upper quartile of the data,
and the whiskers extend from the minimum to the maximum of the data. <bold>(a)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA bias (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(b)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> POA bias (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(c)</bold> Formaldehyde (HCHO) bias (ppb). <bold>(d)</bold> CO bias (ppb).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/18247/2021/acp-21-18247-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2961">SOA concentrations can be a function of temperature based on precursor
emissions and chemistry throughout the day. Previous work has demonstrated that
observed OA in Los Angeles is positively correlated with temperature, and
declining OA concentrations have been due largely to reductions in
temperature-independent OA. Because this corresponds to a decline in
anthropogenic emissions, Nussbaumer and Cohen (2021) suggest that anthropogenically derived OA is
largely temperature-independent while biogenically derived OA is largely
temperature-dependent. Modeled OA is positively correlated with temperature,
consistent with the observed Los Angeles OA, and is driven by the larger,
secondary portion of OA, rather than POA (Fig. S7). However, the improvement
to predicted SOA between simulation cases was seen unequally at different
temperatures, as indicated by the larger reduction in absolute model bias at
higher temperatures (Fig. 5a). This suggests that
the SOA derived from VCP species has a temperature-dependent response, in
addition to the biogenic emissions cited in Nussbaumer and Cohen (2021). In particular, because nonoxygenated IVOCs were the dominant source of increased SOA predicted by the CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP simulation, this work suggests that
S/IVOCs are an important source of temperature-dependent SOA in Los Angeles.</p>
      <p id="d1e2972">Because S/IVOCs have been shown to be a major constituent of modeled SOA and
contribute to the correlation between SOA bias and temperature, other
sources of S/IVOC emissions may account for some of the remaining residual
SOA bias in the model. For example, asphalt emissions are proposed to
contribute 8 %–30 % of total S/IVOC emissions in the South Coast Air Basin in southern California and have SOA mass yields exceeding 10 % (Khare et al., 2020). Their potential
to form SOA is very large, and because asphalt emissions are highly
temperature-dependent, the SOA increase would be seen largely around midday,
resulting in an improvement in high-temperature SOA bias. In addition, the
underprediction of oxygenated gas-phase IVOCs (Sect. 3.1) suggests that
additional sources of oxygenated IVOC precursors may be missing from the
complete inventory. One possible explanation of the temperature dependence
of the SOA bias is that modeled SOA volatility is too high. But oxygenated
SOA is nonvolatile and nonoxygenated IVOC SOA<?pagebreak page18256?> is continually processed to
lower volatility through gas-phase OH oxidation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2975">Formaldehyde, CO, and POA are often used to understand the atmospheric
evolution of SOA because they are products of the same anthropogenic
activity and/or VOC oxidation chemistry that forms SOA. As such, they can be
used to better understand the remaining sources of error in the model. POA
is formed via combustion from vehicles, industrial processes, cooking, and
biomass burning (Jathar et al., 2014; Huffman et al., 2009). CO and formaldehyde are emitted from many processes and formed as
products of atmospheric VOC oxidation (Seinfeld and Pandis,
2016). These species are often used to understand the effect of dilution on
SOA (Hayes et al., 2013). Dilution is caused by both atmospheric transport away from emission sources and the change in planetary boundary layer (PBL) height over the diurnal cycle. VCPs do not emit POA, CO, or formaldehyde, so any changes observed in their simulated concentrations were caused by chemical and physical processing in the existing model.</p>
      <p id="d1e2978">The POA bias did not express the same temperature dependence as SOA, and
thus POA is not affected in the same way in the model by the processes
causing the temperature dependence of SOA bias. Since VCPs do not emit POA
and all other emission sources were consistent between simulation cases, the
slight increase in POA concentrations between the zero VCP and
CMAQv5.3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VCP cases (Figs. 5 and S7) is due to increased partitioning of
semivolatile POA into the particle-phase resulting from higher total OA mass
loadings (the treatment of semivolatile POA in CMAQ is described in Murphy
et al., 2017). The POA bias can be exclusively attributed to errors in
combustion source emissions inventories and meteorological effects. The
combustion source inventories also include emissions of gaseous SOA
precursors, which may be incorrectly modeled even if the POA emissions are
accurate, especially for cooking and biomass burning sources. While the POA
bias does decrease with increasing temperature, it is positive at all
temperatures and does not have larger underpredictions at higher
temperatures (Fig. 5b). Due to the inconsistency
between POA and SOA behavior, errors influencing the emission and transport
of POA can likely not be used to describe the temperature dependence of SOA
bias. The POA bias also does not provide information about the error in
vapor emissions from combustion sources – including S/IVOCs – and their
temperature dependence, and improving combustion emissions inventories may
help to close the model–observation gap for SOA.</p>
      <p id="d1e2988">CO is often used to account for the effects of dilution by scaling SOA to CO
enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">background</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Negligible changes in the CO concentration were found between simulation cases considered here
(Fig. S3), and the model CO bias is uncorrelated with temperature
(Fig. 5d). The consistency of predicted CO
concentration between cases implies that CO is not affected by the emissions
changes to the VCP sector and thus cannot separate SOA formation efficiency
from a lack of emitted precursors. CO enhancement serves as an effective
indicator and correction factor for mobile source emissions in urban areas
(e.g., Hayes et al., 2013; Ensberg et al., 2014; Woody et al., 2016), but this work indicates that CO is not an effective tracer
for distinguishing VCPs from other sources. The lack of correlation between
CO and temperature also implies that errors in the modeled PBL height at
different times of day (and potential impact on the dilution of pollutant
concentrations) are not an important driver of the SOA bias
temperature dependence.</p>
      <p id="d1e3021">In contrast to POA and CO, the formaldehyde bias demonstrated the same trend
with temperature as SOA (Fig. 5c). This suggests
that formaldehyde is affected by emissions, chemistry, and dilution changes
similarly to SOA. This is supported by the stronger correlation seen between
SOA and formaldehyde compared to the correlation between SOA and POA or CO
(Fig. S8). Therefore, formaldehyde may provide more information about the
errors in modeling VOC chemistry and possibly SOA formation. It is possible
that remaining formaldehyde bias is due to missing formaldehyde emissions.
The VCP inventory includes near-zero emissions of formaldehyde, but
formaldehyde is emitted from wooden furniture and emission rates increase
with temperature (Wang et al., 2021). This may account for some of the temperature dependence of formaldehyde bias but likely not the entirety since the VCP emissions inventory has been evaluated with select ambient VOC measurements with low error (Seltzer et al., 2021). One possible explanation of the temperature dependence of both the SOA and the formaldehyde biases is missing sources of emissions and resulting chemistry. Previous work has shown that formaldehyde formation is particularly sensitive to the emissions/chemistry of alkenes (e.g., isoprene) and, to a lesser extent, alkanes and aromatics (Luecken et al., 2018), so these precursors likely indicate missing emissions as a source of error in our model. While the radical chemistry of these hydrocarbon precursors is included in the model, additional missing chemistry may be causing some of the error. Chemical processes that have not been included in the mechanism include autooxidation (Crounse et al., 2013) – which forms low-volatility SOA – and formaldehyde potentially formed from
the fragmentation of S/IVOC precursors into SOA. The inclusion of these
missing emissions and/or chemistry would further impact oxidant levels,
which we have shown to be an important source of modeled SOA and
formaldehyde. As stated above, the behavior of POA and CO bias suggests that
errors in combustion emissions and PBL height cannot fully describe the
temperature dependence of SOA bias, and POA and CO are better indicators of
mobile and industrial sources. Formaldehyde may instead serve as a better
indicator of SOA production in urban areas where VCPs are important
atmospheric constituents. While many factors may contribute to the
temperature dependence of SOA and formaldehyde bias, future work must
investigate the importance of these factors, and<?pagebreak page18257?> tracking the response of
formaldehyde to these changes alongside SOA could provide insight.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions and future work</title>
      <p id="d1e3033">We have shown that VCPs are a major source of SOA in urban atmospheres by
introducing updated emissions and VCP-relevant chemistry into CMAQ that
better represents SOA precursors emitted from these sources. This includes
three new categories of emissions: siloxanes, oxygenated IVOCs, and
nonoxygenated IVOCs. VCP emissions from the VCPy framework (Seltzer
et al., 2021) were used to parameterize the new chemistry, and the mapping
of VCP emitted species to model surrogates was reviewed and updated based on
species structure, volatility, and estimated SOA yield.</p>
      <p id="d1e3036">The new model chemistry and emissions inventory doubles the predicted SOA
concentrations above background levels, increasing the average daily maximum
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA concentration by 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, equating to a 21 % decrease in the absolute mean bias. Most of the increased SOA mass was formed from nonoxygenated IVOC VCP precursors, followed by SOA formed from traditional VOC precursors and oxygenated IVOC precursors, with little SOA formed from siloxanes. Improvements were additionally seen in simulated
formaldehyde and ozone concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d1e3068">Future work should consider how VCP emissions have evolved over time. VCPy
version 1.0 requires information about VCP product composition and usage
patterns from broad sources, including product surveys, economic statistics,
and population distributions. These metrics change over time and will affect
both the speciation and emission rates of organic compounds from VCPs.
Diurnal and seasonal patterns of VCP emissions should also be updated to
reflect more recent observations (Gkatzelis et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e3071">The remaining error in VCP-derived SOA predictions may reflect our lack of
understanding about the oxidation pathways of low-volatility and/or
oxygenated species. More information is needed about the structure,
volatility, and reactivity of the products of atmospheric oxidation
reactions, plus the impacts of wall loss and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations on SOA
yields from experiments, so that models and parameterizations like the VBS
can be developed. As these data become available, models can be improved to
represent SOA formation from oxygenated precursors and S/IVOCs emitted from
VCPs. In addition, the correlation between SOA concentration bias and
temperature suggests residual model error is associated with missing sources
of S/IVOC emissions, including emissions from asphalt (Khare et al., 2020), combustion sources, or other S/IVOCs that have large potential to form SOA. The formaldehyde bias demonstrates a similar relationship to temperature to the SOA bias, implying that investigations of formaldehyde could provide insight into VOC chemistry leading to the formation of SOA from VCPs. Including S/IVOC emissions and their atmospheric chemistry will be important for future air quality models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3088">CalNex observations are publicly available at
<uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/groups/csd7/measurements/2010calnex/</uri> (last access: 7 July 2021) (CalNex measurement data, 2012). The full VCPy dataset is available by downloading VCPyv1.0 at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.23719/1520157" ext-link-type="DOI">10.23719/1520157</ext-link> (U.S. EPA, 2021a). The SAPRC07TIC_AE7I_VCP speciation profile, CMAQ chemical mechanism source code, and CMAQ output are posted at <uri>https://doi.org/10.23719/1522655</uri> (U.S. EPA, 2021b).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3100">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18247-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18247-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3109">HOTP, KMS, and EAP designed the research. EAP and KMS implemented the mechanism in 65 CMAQv5.3.2 and ran the simulations. EAP, KMS, HOTP, BNM, MQ, and JHS participated in data analysis and discussions. EAP drafted the paper with input from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3115">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e3121">Although this work was contributed by research staff in the Environmental
Protection Agency and has been reviewed and approved for publication, it
does not reflect official policy of the EPA. The views expressed in this
document are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
the agency. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services
mentioned in this publication.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3130">The authors thank Christopher Cappa, Wyat Appel, and Ben Schulze for
modeling support and helpful discussions.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3135">Karl Seltzer and Elyse Pennington were supported by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Research Participation Program for the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Elyse Pennington was also supported by a Global Research Outreach (GRO) award from the Samsung
Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3141">This paper was edited by Manabu Shiraiwa and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Appel, K. W., Bash, J. O., Fahey, K. M., Foley, K. M., Gilliam, R. C., Hogrefe, C., Hutzell, W. T., Kang, D., Mathur, R., Murphy, B. N., Napelenok, S. L., Nolte, C. G., Pleim, J. E., Pouliot, G. A., Pye, H. O. T., Ran, L., Roselle, S. J., Sarwar, G., Schwede, D. B., Sidi, F. I., Spero, T. L., and Wong, D. C.: The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2867–2897, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2867-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-2867-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baker, K. R., Carlton, A. G., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg, J. H., Beaver, M. R., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Gilman, J. B., de Gouw, J. A., Woody, M. C., Pye, H. O. T., Kelly, J. T., Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Stevens, P. S., Brune, W. H., Lin, Y.-H., Rubitschun, C. L., and Surratt, J. D.: Gas and aerosol carbon in California: comparison of measurements and model predictions in Pasadena and Bakersfield, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5243–5258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5243-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5243-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bash, J. O., Baker, K. R., and Beaver, M. R.: Evaluation of improved land use and canopy representation in BEIS v3.61 with biogenic VOC measurements in California, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2191–2207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2191-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-2191-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Binkowski, F. S. and Roselle, S. J.: Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component 1. Model description, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4183, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001409" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001409</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>CalNex measurement data: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, CalNex 2010 [data set], available at: <uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/groups/csd7/measurements/2010calnex/</uri> (last access: 7 July 2021), 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D. and Wilson, K. R.: Multi-generation gas-phase oxidation, equilibrium partitioning, and the formation and evolution of secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9505–9528, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9505-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9505-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Charan, S. M., Buenconsejo, R. S., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol yields from the oxidation of benzyl alcohol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13167–13190, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13167-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-13167-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Charan, S. M., Huang, Y., Buenconsejo, R. S., Li, Q., Cocker III, D. R., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from the Oxidation of Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane at Atmospherically Relevant OH Concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2021-353</ext-link>, in review, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Coggon, M. M., McDonald, B. C., Vlasenko, A., Veres, P. R., Bernard, F.,
Koss, A. R., Yuan, B., Gilman, J. B., Peischl, J., Aikin, K. C., DuRant, J.,
Warneke, C., Li, S.-M., and de Gouw, J. A.: Diurnal Variability and Emission
Pattern of Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) from the Application of
Personal Care Products in Two North American Cities, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 5610–5618, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00506" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b00506</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Coggon, M. M., Gkatzelis, G. I., McDonald, B. C., Gilman, J. B., Schwantes,
R. H., Abuhassan, N., Aikin, K. C., Arend, M. F., Berkoff, T. A., Brown, S.
S., Campos, T. L., Dickerson, R. R., Gronoff, G., Hurley, J. F.,
Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Koss, A. R., Li, M., McKeen, S. A., Moshary, F.,
Peischl, J., Pospisilova, V., Ren, X., Wilson, A. Wu, Y., Trainer, M., and
Warneke, C.: Volatile chemical product emissions enhance ozone and modulate
urban chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2026653118,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026653118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2026653118</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crounse, J. D., Nielsen, L. B., Jørgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Autoxidation of Organic Compounds in the Atmosphere, J.
Phys. Chem. Lett., 4, 3513–3520, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jz4019207" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jz4019207</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Epstein, S. A., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A two-dimensional volatility basis set: 1. organic-aerosol mixing thermodynamics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3303–3318, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3303-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3303-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ensberg, J. J., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J. A., Holloway, J. S., Gordon, T. D., Jathar, S., Robinson, A. L., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Emission factor ratios, SOA mass yields, and the impact of vehicular emissions on SOA formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2383–2397, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2383-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2383-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Epstein, S. A., Riipinen, I., and Donahue, N. M.: A Semiempirical
Correlation between Enthalpy of Vaporization and Saturation Concentration
for Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 743–748,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es902497z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es902497z</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gkatzelis, G. I., Coggon, M. M., McDonald, B. C., Peischl, J., Aikin, K. C.,
Gilman, J. B., Trainer, M., and Warneke, C.: Identifying Volatile Chemical
Product Tracer Compounds in U.S. Cities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55,
188–199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05467" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c05467</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goldstein, A. H. and Galbally, I. E.: Known and Unexplored Organic
Constituents in the Earth's Atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
1514–1521, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es072476p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es072476p</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Griffith, S. M., Hansen, R. F., Dusanter, S., Michoud, V., Gilman, J. B.,
Kuster, W. C., Veres, P. R., Graus, M., Gouw, J. A. de, Roberts, J., Young,
C., Washenfelder, R., Brown, S. S., Thalman, R., Waxman, E., Volkamer, R.,
Tsai, C., Stutz, J., Flynn, J. H., Grossberg, N., Lefer, B., Alvarez, S. L.,
Rappenglueck, B., Mielke, L. H., Osthoff, H. D., and Stevens, P. S.:
Measurements of hydroxyl and hydroperoxy radicals during CalNex-LA: Model
comparisons and radical budgets, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121,
4211–4232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024358" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024358</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hayes, P. L., Ortega, A. M., Cubison, M. J., Froyd, K. D., Zhao, Y., Cliff,
S. S., Hu, W. W., Toohey, D. W., Flynn, J. H., Lefer, B. L., Grossberg, N.,
Alvarez, S., Rappenglück, B., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., Holloway, J.
S., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J. A., Massoli, P., Zhang, X.,
Liu, J., Weber, R. J., Corrigan, A. L., Russell, L. M., Isaacman, G., Worton,
D. R., Kreisberg, N. M., Goldstein, A. H., Thalman, R., Waxman, E. M., Volkamer, R., Lin, Y.H., Surratt, J. D., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg, J. H., Dusanter, S., Griffith, S., Stevens, P. S., Brioude, J., Angevine, W. M., and Jimenez, J. L.: Organic aerosol composition and sources in Pasadena, California, during the 2010 CalNex campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
9233–9257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50530</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hayes, P. L., Carlton, A. G., Baker, K. R., Ahmadov, R., Washenfelder, R. A., Alvarez, S., Rappenglück, B., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J. A., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg, J. H., Ma, P. K., and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling the formation and aging of secondary organic aerosols in Los Angeles during CalNex 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5773–5801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page18259?><ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hodzic, A., Aumont, B., Knote, C., Lee-Taylor, J., Madronich, S., and
Tyndall, G.: Volatility dependence of Henry's law constants of condensable
organics: Application to estimate depositional loss of secondary organic
aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4795–4804,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL060649</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huffman, J. A., Docherty, K. S., Mohr, C., Cubison, M. J., Ulbrich, I. M.,
Ziemann, P. J., Onasch, T. B., and Jimenez, J. L.: Chemically-Resolved
Volatility Measurements of Organic Aerosol from Different Sources, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 43, 5351–5357, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803539d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es803539d</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hyslop, N. P.: Impaired visibility: The air pollution people see, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 182–195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.067</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Anthropogenic and Natural
Radiative Forcing, in: Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis:
Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press,
659–740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Janechek, N. J., Hansen, K. M., and Stanier, C. O.: Comprehensive atmospheric modeling of reactive cyclic siloxanes and their oxidation products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8357–8370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8357-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-8357-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Janechek, N. J., Marek, R. F., Bryngelson, N., Singh, A., Bullard, R. L., Brune, W. H., and Stanier, C. O.: Physical properties of secondary photochemical aerosol from OH oxidation of a cyclic siloxane, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1649–1664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1649-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-1649-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Hennigan, C. J., Pye, H. O. T., Pouliot, G.,
Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Unspeciated organic
emissions from combustion sources and their influence on the secondary
organic aerosol budget in the United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 10473–10478, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1323740111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jathar, S. H., Woody, M., Pye, H. O. T., Baker, K. R., and Robinson, A. L.: Chemical transport model simulations of organic aerosol in southern California: model evaluation and gasoline and diesel source contributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4305–4318, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4305-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4305-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun,
Y. L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarrap, M. R., Williams, P. I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M.,
Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger,
U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere,
Science, 326, 1525–1529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J., Wolfe, G. M., Bohn, B., Broch, S., Fuchs, H., Ganzeveld, L. N., Gomm, S., Häseler, R., Hofzumahaus, A., Holland, F., Jäger, J., Li, X., Lohse, I., Lu, K., Prévôt, A. S. H., Rohrer, F., Wegener, R., Wolf, R., Mentel, T. F., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Wahner, A., and Keutsch, F. N.: Evidence for an unidentified non-photochemical ground-level source of formaldehyde in the Po Valley with potential implications for ozone production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1289–1298, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1289-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1289-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Khare, P. and Gentner, D. R.: Considering the future of anthropogenic gas-phase organic compound emissions and the increasing influence of non-combustion sources on urban air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5391–5413, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5391-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-5391-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Khare, P., Machesky, J., Soto, R., He, M., Presto, A. A., and Gentner, D. R.: Asphalt-related emissions are a major missing nontraditional source of
secondary organic aerosol precursors, Science Adv., 6, eabb9785,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb9785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.abb9785</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Levelt, P. F., Joiner, J., Tamminen, J., Veefkind, J. P., Bhartia, P. K., Stein Zweers, D. C., Duncan, B. N., Streets, D. G., Eskes, H., van der A, R., McLinden, C., Fioletov, V., Carn, S., de Laat, J., DeLand, M., Marchenko, S., McPeters, R., Ziemke, J., Fu, D., Liu, X., Pickering, K., Apituley, A., González Abad, G., Arola, A., Boersma, F., Chan Miller, C., Chance, K., de Graaf, M., Hakkarainen, J., Hassinen, S., Ialongo, I., Kleipool, Q., Krotkov, N., Li, C., Lamsal, L., Newman, P., Nowlan, C., Suleiman, R., Tilstra, L. G., Torres, O., Wang, H., and Wargan, K.: The Ozone Monitoring Instrument: overview of 14 years in space, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5699–5745, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5699-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-5699-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, L. and Cocker, D. R.: Molecular structure impacts on secondary organic
aerosol formation from glycol ethers, Atmos. Environ., 180, 206–215,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.12.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.12.025</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, W., Li, L., Chen, C., Kacarab, M., Peng, W., Price, D., Xu, J., and
Cocker, D. R.: Potential of select intermediate-volatility organic compounds
and consumer products for secondary organic aerosol and ozone formation
under relevant urban conditions, Atmos. Environ., 178, 109–117,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.12.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.12.019</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Rodier, C., Lea, J. D., Harvey, J., and Kleeman, M. J.: Improving
spatial surrogates for area source emissions inventories in California,
Atmos. Environ., 247, 117665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117665" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117665</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liao, J., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., St. Clair, J., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Nault, B. A., Fried, A., Marais, E. A., Gonzalez Abad, G., Chance, K., Jethva, H. T., Ryerson, T. B., Warneke, C., and Wisthaler, A.: Towards a satellite formaldehyde – in situ hybrid estimate for organic aerosol abundance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2765–2785, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2765-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-2765-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lim, S. S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Adair-Rohani,
H., AlMazroa, M. A., Amann, M., Anderson, H. R., Andrews, K. G., Aryee, M.,
Atkinson, C., Bacchus, L. J., Bahalim, A. N., Balakrishnan, K., Balmes, J.,
Barker-Collo, S., Baxter, A., Bell, M. L., Blore, J. D., Blyth, F., Bonner,
C., Borges, G., Bourne, R., Boussinesq, M., Brauer, M., Brooks, P., Bruce,
N. G., Brunekreef, B., Bryan-Hancock, C., Bucello, C., Buchbinder, R., Bull,
F., Burnett, R. T., Byers, T. E., Calabria, B., Carapetis, J., Carnahan, E.,
Chafe, Z., Charlson, F., Chen, H., Chen, J. S., Cheng, A. T.-A., Child, J.
C., Cohen, A., Colson, K. E., Cowie<?pagebreak page18260?>, B. C., Darby, S., Darling, S., Davis,
A., Degenhardt, L., Dentener, F., Jarlais, D. C. D., Devries, K., Dherani,
M., Ding, E. L., Dorsey, E. R., Driscoll, T., Edmond, K., Ali, S. E.,
Engell, R. E., Erwin, P. J., Fahimi, S., Falder, G., Farzadfar, F., Ferrari,
A., Finucane, M. M., Flaxman, S., Fowkes, F. G. R., Freedman, G., Freeman,
M. K., Gakidou, E., Ghosh, S., Giovannucci, E., Gmel, G., Graham, K.,
Grainger, R., Grant, B., Gunnell, D., Gutierrez, H. R., Hall, W., Hoek, H.
W., Hogan, A., Hosgood, H. D., Hoy, D., Hu, H., Hubbell, B. J., Hutchings,
S. J., Ibeanusi, S. E., Jacklyn, G. L., Jasrasaria, R., Jonas, J. B., Kan,
H., Kanis, J. A., Kassebaum, N., Kawakami, N., Khang, Y.-H., Khatibzadeh,
S., Khoo, J.-P., Kok, C., Laden, F., Lalloo, R., Lan, Q., Lathlean, T.,
Leasher, J. L., Leigh, J., Li, Y., Lin, J. K., Lipshultz, S. E., London, S.,
Lozano, R., Lu, Y., Mak, J., Malekzadeh, R., Mallinger, L., Marcenes, W.,
March, L., Marks, R., Martin, R., McGale, P., McGrath, J., Mehta, S.,
Memish, Z. A., Mensah, G. A., Merriman, T. R., Micha, R., Michaud, C.,
Mishra, V., Hanafiah, K. M., Mokdad, A. A., Morawska, L., Mozaffarian, D.,
Murphy, T., Naghavi, M., Neal, B., Nelson, P. K., Nolla, J. M., Norman, R.,
Olives, C., Omer, S. B., Orchard, J., Osborne, R., Ostro, B., Page, A.,
Pandey, K. D., Parry, C. D., Passmore, E., Patra, J., Pearce, N., Pelizzari,
P. M., Petzold, M., Phillips, M. R., Pope, D., Pope, C. A., Powles, J., Rao,
M., Razavi, H., Rehfuess, E. A., Rehm, J. T., Ritz, B., Rivara, F. P.,
Roberts, T., Robinson, C., Rodriguez-Portales, J. A., Romieu, I., Room, R.,
Rosenfeld, L. C., Roy, A., Rushton, L., Salomon, J. A., Sampson, U.,
Sanchez-Riera, L., Sanman, E., Sapkota, A., Seedat, S., Shi, P., Shield, K.,
Shivakoti, R., Singh, G. M., Sleet, D. A., Smith, E., Smith, K. R.,
Stapelberg, N. J., Steenland, K., Stöckl, H., Stovner, L. J., Straif,
K., Straney, L., Thurston, G. D., Tran, J. H., Dingenen, R. V., Donkelaar,
A. van, Veerman, J. L., Vijayakumar, L., Weintraub, R., Weissman, M. M.,
White, R. A., Whiteford, H., Wiersma, S. T., Wilkinson, J. D., Williams, H.
C., Williams, W., Wilson, N., Woolf, A. D., Yip, P., Zielinski, J. M.,
Lopez, A. D., Murray, C. J., Ezzati, M.: A Comparative Risk Assessment of
Burden of Disease and Injury Attributable to 67 Risk Factors and Risk Factor
Clusters in 21 Regions, 1990–2010: A Systematic Analysis for the Global
Burden of Disease Study 2010, Lancet, 380, 2224–2260,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lu, Q., Murphy, B. N., Qin, M., Adams, P. J., Zhao, Y., Pye, H. O. T., Efstathiou, C., Allen, C., and Robinson, A. L.: Simulation of organic aerosol formation during the CalNex study: updated mobile emissions and secondary organic aerosol parameterization for intermediate-volatility organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4313–4332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4313-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4313-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Luecken, D. J., Napelenok, S. L., Strum, M., Scheffe, R., and Phillips, S.:
Sensitivity of Ambient Atmospheric Formaldehyde and Ozone to Precursor
Species and Source Types Across the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 4668–4675, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05509" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b05509</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McDonald, B. C., Gouw, J. A. de, Gilman, J. B., Jathar, S. H., Akherati, A.,
Cappa, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Lee-Taylor, J., Hayes, P. L., McKeen, S. A.,
Cui, Y. Y., Kim, S.-W., Gentner, D. R., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Goldstein, A.
H., Harley, R. A., Frost, G. J., Roberts, J. M., Ryerson, T. B., and
Trainer, M.: Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical
source of urban organic emissions, Science, 359, 760–764,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aaq0524</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Milani, A., Al-Naiema, I. M., and Stone, E. A.: Detection of a secondary
organic aerosol tracer derived from personal care products, Atmos. Environ.,
246, 118078, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118078</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murphy, B. N., Woody, M. C., Jimenez, J. L., Carlton, A. M. G., Hayes, P. L., Liu, S., Ng, N. L., Russell, L. M., Setyan, A., Xu, L., Young, J., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, Q., and Pye, H. O. T.: Semivolatile POA and parameterized total combustion SOA in CMAQv5.2: impacts on source strength and partitioning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11107–11133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murphy, B. N., Nolte, C. G., Sidi, F., Bash, J. O., Appel, K. W., Jang, C., Kang, D., Kelly, J., Mathur, R., Napelenok, S., Pouliot, G., and Pye, H. O. T.: The Detailed Emissions Scaling, Isolation, and Diagnostic (DESID) module in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.3.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3407–3420, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3407-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-3407-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nussbaumer, C. M. and Cohen, R. C.: Impact of OA on the Temperature
Dependence of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Los Angeles Basin, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
55, 3549–3558, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07144" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c07144</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Pinder, R. W., Piletic, I. R., Xie, Y., Capps, S. L., Lin,
Y.-H., Surratt, J. D., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Luecken, D. J., Hutzell, W. T.,
Jaoui, M., Offenberg, J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., and Edney,
E. O.: Epoxide Pathways Improve Model Predictions of Isoprene Markers and
Reveal Key Role of Acidity in Aerosol Formation, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
47, 11056–11064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402106h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es402106h</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Murphy, B. N., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Carlton, A. G., Guo, H., Weber, R., Vasilakos, P., Appel, K. W., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Surratt, J. D., Nenes, A., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Misztal, P. K., and Goldstein, A. H.: On the implications of aerosol liquid water and phase separation for organic aerosol mass, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 343–369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-343-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-343-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Qin, M., Murphy, B. N., Isaacs, K. K., McDonald, B. C., Lu, Q., McKeen, S.
A., Koval, L., Robinson, A. L., Efstathiou, C., Allen, C., and Pye, H. O.
T.: Criteria pollutant impacts of volatile chemical products informed by
near-field modelling, Nat. Sustain., 4, 129–137,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00614-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41893-020-00614-1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1133061</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ryerson, T. B., Andrews, A. E., Angevine, W. M., Bates, T. S., Brock, C. A.,
Cairns, B., Cohen, R. C., Cooper, O. R., de Gouw, J. A., Fehsenfeld, F. C.,
Ferrare, R. A., Fischer, M. L., Flagan, R. C., Goldstein, A. H., Hair, J.
W., Hardesty, R. M., Hostetler, C. A., Jimenez, J. L., Langford, A. O.,
McCauley, E., McKeen, S. A., Molina, L. T., Nenes, A., Oltmans, S. J., Parrish, D. D., Pederson, J. R., Pierce, R. B., Prather, K., Quinn, P. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Senff, C. J., Sorooshian, A., Stutz, J., Surratt, J. D., Trainer, M., Volkamer, R., Williams, E. J., and Wofsy, S. C.: The 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5830–5866, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50331" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50331</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page18261?><ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Santoni, G. W., Daube, B. C., Kort, E. A., Jiménez, R., Park, S., Pittman, J. V., Gottlieb, E., Xiang, B., Zahniser, M. S., Nelson, D. D., McManus, J. B., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Holloway, J. S., Andrews, A. E., Sweeney, C., Hall, B., Hintsa, E. J., Moore, F. L., Elkins, J. W., Hurst, D. F., Stephens, B. B., Bent, J., and Wofsy, S. C.: Evaluation of the airborne quantum cascade laser spectrometer (QCLS) measurements of the carbon and greenhouse gas suite – CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and CO – during the CalNex and HIPPO campaigns, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1509–1526, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1509-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-1509-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, 3rd edn., in: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seltzer, K. M., Pennington, E., Rao, V., Murphy, B. N., Strum, M., Isaacs, K. K., and Pye, H. O. T.: Reactive organic carbon emissions from volatile chemical products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5079–5100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5079-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-5079-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shah, R. U., Coggon, M. M., Gkatzelis, G. I., McDonald, B. C., Tasoglou, A.,
Huber, H., Gilman, J., Warneke, C., Robinson, A. L., and Presto, A. A.:
Urban Oxidation Flow Reactor Measurements Reveal Significant Secondary
Organic Aerosol Contributions from Volatile Emissions of Emerging
Importance, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 714–725, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06531" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b06531</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Shah, T., Shi, Y., Beardsley, R., and Yarwood, G.: Speciation Tool User's Guide Version 5.0, Ramboll US Corporation, Novato, California, 41 pp.,  2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., and Barker, D.: A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3
(NCAR/TN-475<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>STR), University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, 113 pp.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D68S4MVH</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>U.S. EPA: Air Quality System (AQS), U.S. EPA [data set], available at:
<uri>https://www.epa.gov/aqs</uri> (last access: 4 February 2021), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>U.S. EPA: National Emissions Inventory (NEI), U.S. EPA [code], available at:
<uri>https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/national-emissions-inventory-nei</uri> (last access: 23 June 2021),
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>U.S. EPA: AE7I Species Table, U.S. EPA [code], available at:
<uri>https://github.com/USEPA/CMAQ/blob/72ec4e5681e1ed0b4917792a9a240b0302a303a7/CCTM/src/MECHS/mechanism_information/saprc07tic_ae7i_aq/AE7I_species_table.md</uri> (last access: 23 June 2021), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>U.S. EPA: CMAQ, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4081737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4081737</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>U.S. EPA: Reactive Organic Carbon Emissions from Volatile Chemical Products, U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD) [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.23719/1520157" ext-link-type="DOI">10.23719/1520157</ext-link>​​​​​​​, 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>U.S. EPA: Data for Modeling secondary organic aerosol formation from volatile chemical products, U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD) [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.23719/1522655" ext-link-type="DOI">10.23719/1522655</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, D.-G., Norwood, W., Alaee, M., Byer, J. D., and Brimble, S.: Review of
recent advances in research on the toxicity, detection, occurrence and fate
of cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes in the environment, Chemosphere, 93,
711–725, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.041</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Wang, H., Tan, Y., Liu, J., Wang, K., Ji, W., Sun, L., Yu, X.,
Zhao, J., Xu, B., and Xiong, J.: Measurement of the key parameters of VOC
emissions from wooden furniture, and the impact of temperature. Atmos.
Environ., 259, 118510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118510" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118510</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Warneke, C., Veres, P., Holloway, J. S., Stutz, J., Tsai, C., Alvarez, S., Rappenglueck, B., Fehsenfeld, F. C., Graus, M., Gilman, J. B., and de Gouw, J. A.: Airborne formaldehyde measurements using PTR-MS: calibration, humidity dependence, inter-comparison and initial results, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2345–2358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2345-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-2345-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Woody, M. C., Baker, K. R., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Koo, B., and Pye, H. O. T.: Understanding sources of organic aerosol during CalNex-2010 using the CMAQ-VBS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4081–4100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, Y. and Johnston, M. V.: Aerosol Formation from OH Oxidation of the
Volatile Cyclic Methyl Siloxane (cVMS) Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 4445–4451,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00655" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b00655</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, Y., Paulot, F., Carter, W. P. L., Nolte, C. G., Luecken, D. J., Hutzell, W. T., Wennberg, P. O., Cohen, R. C., and Pinder, R. W.: Understanding the impact of recent advances in isoprene photooxidation on simulations of regional air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8439–8455, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8439-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8439-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Ulbrich, I., Alfarra, M. R., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Sun, Y. L.,
Dzepina, K., Dunlea, E., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P. F., Salcedo, D., Onasch,
T., Jayne, J. T., Miyoshi, T., Shimono, A., Hatakeyama, S., Takegawa, N.,
Kondo, Y., Schneider J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian,
K., Williams, P., Bower, K., Bahreini, R., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R. J.,
Rautiainen, J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Ubiquity and
dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in
anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL029979</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., Tkacik, D. S., de Gouw, J. A.,
Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., Borbon, A., and Robinson, A. L.:
Intermediate-Volatility Organic Compounds: A Large Source of Secondary
Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 13743–13750,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5035188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es5035188</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Nguyen, N. T., Presto, A. A., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., and
Robinson, A. L.: Intermediate Volatility Organic Compound Emissions from
On-Road Diesel Vehicles: Chemical Composition, Emission Factors, and
Estimated Secondary Organic Aerosol Production, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
49, 11516–11526, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02841" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b02841</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Modeling secondary organic aerosol formation from volatile chemical products</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Appel, K. W., Bash, J. O., Fahey, K. M., Foley, K. M., Gilliam, R. C., Hogrefe, C., Hutzell, W. T., Kang, D., Mathur, R., Murphy, B. N., Napelenok, S. L., Nolte, C. G., Pleim, J. E., Pouliot, G. A., Pye, H. O. T., Ran, L., Roselle, S. J., Sarwar, G., Schwede, D. B., Sidi, F. I., Spero, T. L., and Wong, D. C.: The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2867–2897, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2867-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2867-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, K. R., Carlton, A. G., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg, J. H., Beaver, M. R., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Gilman, J. B., de Gouw, J. A., Woody, M. C., Pye, H. O. T., Kelly, J. T., Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Stevens, P. S., Brune, W. H., Lin, Y.-H., Rubitschun, C. L., and Surratt, J. D.: Gas and aerosol carbon in California: comparison of measurements and model predictions in Pasadena and Bakersfield, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5243–5258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5243-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5243-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bash, J. O., Baker, K. R., and Beaver, M. R.: Evaluation of improved land use and canopy representation in BEIS v3.61 with biogenic VOC measurements in California, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2191–2207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2191-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2191-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Binkowski, F. S. and Roselle, S. J.: Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component 1. Model description, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4183, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001409" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001409</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
CalNex measurement data: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, CalNex 2010 [data set], available at: <a href="https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/groups/csd7/measurements/2010calnex/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 7 July 2021), 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cappa, C. D. and Wilson, K. R.: Multi-generation gas-phase oxidation, equilibrium partitioning, and the formation and evolution of secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9505–9528, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9505-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9505-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Charan, S. M., Buenconsejo, R. S., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol yields from the oxidation of benzyl alcohol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13167–13190, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13167-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13167-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Charan, S. M., Huang, Y., Buenconsejo, R. S., Li, Q., Cocker III, D. R., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from the Oxidation of Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane at Atmospherically Relevant OH Concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-353</a>, in review, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Coggon, M. M., McDonald, B. C., Vlasenko, A., Veres, P. R., Bernard, F.,
Koss, A. R., Yuan, B., Gilman, J. B., Peischl, J., Aikin, K. C., DuRant, J.,
Warneke, C., Li, S.-M., and de Gouw, J. A.: Diurnal Variability and Emission
Pattern of Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) from the Application of
Personal Care Products in Two North American Cities, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 5610–5618, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00506" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00506</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Coggon, M. M., Gkatzelis, G. I., McDonald, B. C., Gilman, J. B., Schwantes,
R. H., Abuhassan, N., Aikin, K. C., Arend, M. F., Berkoff, T. A., Brown, S.
S., Campos, T. L., Dickerson, R. R., Gronoff, G., Hurley, J. F.,
Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Koss, A. R., Li, M., McKeen, S. A., Moshary, F.,
Peischl, J., Pospisilova, V., Ren, X., Wilson, A. Wu, Y., Trainer, M., and
Warneke, C.: Volatile chemical product emissions enhance ozone and modulate
urban chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2026653118,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026653118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026653118</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Crounse, J. D., Nielsen, L. B., Jørgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Autoxidation of Organic Compounds in the Atmosphere, J.
Phys. Chem. Lett., 4, 3513–3520, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jz4019207" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jz4019207</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Epstein, S. A., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A two-dimensional volatility basis set: 1. organic-aerosol mixing thermodynamics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3303–3318, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3303-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3303-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Ensberg, J. J., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J. A., Holloway, J. S., Gordon, T. D., Jathar, S., Robinson, A. L., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Emission factor ratios, SOA mass yields, and the impact of vehicular emissions on SOA formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2383–2397, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2383-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2383-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Epstein, S. A., Riipinen, I., and Donahue, N. M.: A Semiempirical
Correlation between Enthalpy of Vaporization and Saturation Concentration
for Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 743–748,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es902497z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es902497z</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Gkatzelis, G. I., Coggon, M. M., McDonald, B. C., Peischl, J., Aikin, K. C.,
Gilman, J. B., Trainer, M., and Warneke, C.: Identifying Volatile Chemical
Product Tracer Compounds in U.S. Cities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55,
188–199, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05467" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05467</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Goldstein, A. H. and Galbally, I. E.: Known and Unexplored Organic
Constituents in the Earth's Atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
1514–1521, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es072476p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es072476p</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Griffith, S. M., Hansen, R. F., Dusanter, S., Michoud, V., Gilman, J. B.,
Kuster, W. C., Veres, P. R., Graus, M., Gouw, J. A. de, Roberts, J., Young,
C., Washenfelder, R., Brown, S. S., Thalman, R., Waxman, E., Volkamer, R.,
Tsai, C., Stutz, J., Flynn, J. H., Grossberg, N., Lefer, B., Alvarez, S. L.,
Rappenglueck, B., Mielke, L. H., Osthoff, H. D., and Stevens, P. S.:
Measurements of hydroxyl and hydroperoxy radicals during CalNex-LA: Model
comparisons and radical budgets, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121,
4211–4232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024358" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024358</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hayes, P. L., Ortega, A. M., Cubison, M. J., Froyd, K. D., Zhao, Y., Cliff,
S. S., Hu, W. W., Toohey, D. W., Flynn, J. H., Lefer, B. L., Grossberg, N.,
Alvarez, S., Rappenglück, B., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., Holloway, J.
S., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J. A., Massoli, P., Zhang, X.,
Liu, J., Weber, R. J., Corrigan, A. L., Russell, L. M., Isaacman, G., Worton,
D. R., Kreisberg, N. M., Goldstein, A. H., Thalman, R., Waxman, E. M., Volkamer, R., Lin, Y.H., Surratt, J. D., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg, J. H., Dusanter, S., Griffith, S., Stevens, P. S., Brioude, J., Angevine, W. M., and Jimenez, J. L.: Organic aerosol composition and sources in Pasadena, California, during the 2010 CalNex campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
9233–9257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50530" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50530</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hayes, P. L., Carlton, A. G., Baker, K. R., Ahmadov, R., Washenfelder, R. A., Alvarez, S., Rappenglück, B., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J. A., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg, J. H., Ma, P. K., and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling the formation and aging of secondary organic aerosols in Los Angeles during CalNex 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5773–5801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hodzic, A., Aumont, B., Knote, C., Lee-Taylor, J., Madronich, S., and
Tyndall, G.: Volatility dependence of Henry's law constants of condensable
organics: Application to estimate depositional loss of secondary organic
aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4795–4804,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060649" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060649</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Huffman, J. A., Docherty, K. S., Mohr, C., Cubison, M. J., Ulbrich, I. M.,
Ziemann, P. J., Onasch, T. B., and Jimenez, J. L.: Chemically-Resolved
Volatility Measurements of Organic Aerosol from Different Sources, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 43, 5351–5357, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803539d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es803539d</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hyslop, N. P.: Impaired visibility: The air pollution people see, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 182–195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.067</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Anthropogenic and Natural
Radiative Forcing, in: Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis:
Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press,
659–740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Janechek, N. J., Hansen, K. M., and Stanier, C. O.: Comprehensive atmospheric modeling of reactive cyclic siloxanes and their oxidation products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8357–8370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8357-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8357-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Janechek, N. J., Marek, R. F., Bryngelson, N., Singh, A., Bullard, R. L., Brune, W. H., and Stanier, C. O.: Physical properties of secondary photochemical aerosol from OH oxidation of a cyclic siloxane, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1649–1664, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1649-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1649-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Hennigan, C. J., Pye, H. O. T., Pouliot, G.,
Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Unspeciated organic
emissions from combustion sources and their influence on the secondary
organic aerosol budget in the United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 10473–10478, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Jathar, S. H., Woody, M., Pye, H. O. T., Baker, K. R., and Robinson, A. L.: Chemical transport model simulations of organic aerosol in southern California: model evaluation and gasoline and diesel source contributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4305–4318, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4305-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4305-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun,
Y. L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarrap, M. R., Williams, P. I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M.,
Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger,
U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere,
Science, 326, 1525–1529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kaiser, J., Wolfe, G. M., Bohn, B., Broch, S., Fuchs, H., Ganzeveld, L. N., Gomm, S., Häseler, R., Hofzumahaus, A., Holland, F., Jäger, J., Li, X., Lohse, I., Lu, K., Prévôt, A. S. H., Rohrer, F., Wegener, R., Wolf, R., Mentel, T. F., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Wahner, A., and Keutsch, F. N.: Evidence for an unidentified non-photochemical ground-level source of formaldehyde in the Po Valley with potential implications for ozone production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1289–1298, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1289-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1289-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Khare, P. and Gentner, D. R.: Considering the future of anthropogenic gas-phase organic compound emissions and the increasing influence of non-combustion sources on urban air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5391–5413, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5391-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5391-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Khare, P., Machesky, J., Soto, R., He, M., Presto, A. A., and Gentner, D. R.: Asphalt-related emissions are a major missing nontraditional source of
secondary organic aerosol precursors, Science Adv., 6, eabb9785,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb9785" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb9785</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Levelt, P. F., Joiner, J., Tamminen, J., Veefkind, J. P., Bhartia, P. K., Stein Zweers, D. C., Duncan, B. N., Streets, D. G., Eskes, H., van der A, R., McLinden, C., Fioletov, V., Carn, S., de Laat, J., DeLand, M., Marchenko, S., McPeters, R., Ziemke, J., Fu, D., Liu, X., Pickering, K., Apituley, A., González Abad, G., Arola, A., Boersma, F., Chan Miller, C., Chance, K., de Graaf, M., Hakkarainen, J., Hassinen, S., Ialongo, I., Kleipool, Q., Krotkov, N., Li, C., Lamsal, L., Newman, P., Nowlan, C., Suleiman, R., Tilstra, L. G., Torres, O., Wang, H., and Wargan, K.: The Ozone Monitoring Instrument: overview of 14 years in space, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5699–5745, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5699-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5699-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Li, L. and Cocker, D. R.: Molecular structure impacts on secondary organic
aerosol formation from glycol ethers, Atmos. Environ., 180, 206–215,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.12.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.12.025</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Li, W., Li, L., Chen, C., Kacarab, M., Peng, W., Price, D., Xu, J., and
Cocker, D. R.: Potential of select intermediate-volatility organic compounds
and consumer products for secondary organic aerosol and ozone formation
under relevant urban conditions, Atmos. Environ., 178, 109–117,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.12.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.12.019</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Rodier, C., Lea, J. D., Harvey, J., and Kleeman, M. J.: Improving
spatial surrogates for area source emissions inventories in California,
Atmos. Environ., 247, 117665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117665" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117665</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Liao, J., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., St. Clair, J., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Nault, B. A., Fried, A., Marais, E. A., Gonzalez Abad, G., Chance, K., Jethva, H. T., Ryerson, T. B., Warneke, C., and Wisthaler, A.: Towards a satellite formaldehyde – in situ hybrid estimate for organic aerosol abundance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2765–2785, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2765-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2765-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, S. S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Adair-Rohani,
H., AlMazroa, M. A., Amann, M., Anderson, H. R., Andrews, K. G., Aryee, M.,
Atkinson, C., Bacchus, L. J., Bahalim, A. N., Balakrishnan, K., Balmes, J.,
Barker-Collo, S., Baxter, A., Bell, M. L., Blore, J. D., Blyth, F., Bonner,
C., Borges, G., Bourne, R., Boussinesq, M., Brauer, M., Brooks, P., Bruce,
N. G., Brunekreef, B., Bryan-Hancock, C., Bucello, C., Buchbinder, R., Bull,
F., Burnett, R. T., Byers, T. E., Calabria, B., Carapetis, J., Carnahan, E.,
Chafe, Z., Charlson, F., Chen, H., Chen, J. S., Cheng, A. T.-A., Child, J.
C., Cohen, A., Colson, K. E., Cowie, B. C., Darby, S., Darling, S., Davis,
A., Degenhardt, L., Dentener, F., Jarlais, D. C. D., Devries, K., Dherani,
M., Ding, E. L., Dorsey, E. R., Driscoll, T., Edmond, K., Ali, S. E.,
Engell, R. E., Erwin, P. J., Fahimi, S., Falder, G., Farzadfar, F., Ferrari,
A., Finucane, M. M., Flaxman, S., Fowkes, F. G. R., Freedman, G., Freeman,
M. K., Gakidou, E., Ghosh, S., Giovannucci, E., Gmel, G., Graham, K.,
Grainger, R., Grant, B., Gunnell, D., Gutierrez, H. R., Hall, W., Hoek, H.
W., Hogan, A., Hosgood, H. D., Hoy, D., Hu, H., Hubbell, B. J., Hutchings,
S. J., Ibeanusi, S. E., Jacklyn, G. L., Jasrasaria, R., Jonas, J. B., Kan,
H., Kanis, J. A., Kassebaum, N., Kawakami, N., Khang, Y.-H., Khatibzadeh,
S., Khoo, J.-P., Kok, C., Laden, F., Lalloo, R., Lan, Q., Lathlean, T.,
Leasher, J. L., Leigh, J., Li, Y., Lin, J. K., Lipshultz, S. E., London, S.,
Lozano, R., Lu, Y., Mak, J., Malekzadeh, R., Mallinger, L., Marcenes, W.,
March, L., Marks, R., Martin, R., McGale, P., McGrath, J., Mehta, S.,
Memish, Z. A., Mensah, G. A., Merriman, T. R., Micha, R., Michaud, C.,
Mishra, V., Hanafiah, K. M., Mokdad, A. A., Morawska, L., Mozaffarian, D.,
Murphy, T., Naghavi, M., Neal, B., Nelson, P. K., Nolla, J. M., Norman, R.,
Olives, C., Omer, S. B., Orchard, J., Osborne, R., Ostro, B., Page, A.,
Pandey, K. D., Parry, C. D., Passmore, E., Patra, J., Pearce, N., Pelizzari,
P. M., Petzold, M., Phillips, M. R., Pope, D., Pope, C. A., Powles, J., Rao,
M., Razavi, H., Rehfuess, E. A., Rehm, J. T., Ritz, B., Rivara, F. P.,
Roberts, T., Robinson, C., Rodriguez-Portales, J. A., Romieu, I., Room, R.,
Rosenfeld, L. C., Roy, A., Rushton, L., Salomon, J. A., Sampson, U.,
Sanchez-Riera, L., Sanman, E., Sapkota, A., Seedat, S., Shi, P., Shield, K.,
Shivakoti, R., Singh, G. M., Sleet, D. A., Smith, E., Smith, K. R.,
Stapelberg, N. J., Steenland, K., Stöckl, H., Stovner, L. J., Straif,
K., Straney, L., Thurston, G. D., Tran, J. H., Dingenen, R. V., Donkelaar,
A. van, Veerman, J. L., Vijayakumar, L., Weintraub, R., Weissman, M. M.,
White, R. A., Whiteford, H., Wiersma, S. T., Wilkinson, J. D., Williams, H.
C., Williams, W., Wilson, N., Woolf, A. D., Yip, P., Zielinski, J. M.,
Lopez, A. D., Murray, C. J., Ezzati, M.: A Comparative Risk Assessment of
Burden of Disease and Injury Attributable to 67 Risk Factors and Risk Factor
Clusters in 21 Regions, 1990–2010: A Systematic Analysis for the Global
Burden of Disease Study 2010, Lancet, 380, 2224–2260,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, Q., Murphy, B. N., Qin, M., Adams, P. J., Zhao, Y., Pye, H. O. T., Efstathiou, C., Allen, C., and Robinson, A. L.: Simulation of organic aerosol formation during the CalNex study: updated mobile emissions and secondary organic aerosol parameterization for intermediate-volatility organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4313–4332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4313-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4313-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Luecken, D. J., Napelenok, S. L., Strum, M., Scheffe, R., and Phillips, S.:
Sensitivity of Ambient Atmospheric Formaldehyde and Ozone to Precursor
Species and Source Types Across the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 4668–4675, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05509" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05509</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
McDonald, B. C., Gouw, J. A. de, Gilman, J. B., Jathar, S. H., Akherati, A.,
Cappa, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Lee-Taylor, J., Hayes, P. L., McKeen, S. A.,
Cui, Y. Y., Kim, S.-W., Gentner, D. R., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Goldstein, A.
H., Harley, R. A., Frost, G. J., Roberts, J. M., Ryerson, T. B., and
Trainer, M.: Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical
source of urban organic emissions, Science, 359, 760–764,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0524" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0524</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Milani, A., Al-Naiema, I. M., and Stone, E. A.: Detection of a secondary
organic aerosol tracer derived from personal care products, Atmos. Environ.,
246, 118078, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118078" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118078</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, B. N., Woody, M. C., Jimenez, J. L., Carlton, A. M. G., Hayes, P. L., Liu, S., Ng, N. L., Russell, L. M., Setyan, A., Xu, L., Young, J., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, Q., and Pye, H. O. T.: Semivolatile POA and parameterized total combustion SOA in CMAQv5.2: impacts on source strength and partitioning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11107–11133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, B. N., Nolte, C. G., Sidi, F., Bash, J. O., Appel, K. W., Jang, C., Kang, D., Kelly, J., Mathur, R., Napelenok, S., Pouliot, G., and Pye, H. O. T.: The Detailed Emissions Scaling, Isolation, and Diagnostic (DESID) module in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.3.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3407–3420, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3407-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3407-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Nussbaumer, C. M. and Cohen, R. C.: Impact of OA on the Temperature
Dependence of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the Los Angeles Basin, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
55, 3549–3558, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07144" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07144</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Pye, H. O. T., Pinder, R. W., Piletic, I. R., Xie, Y., Capps, S. L., Lin,
Y.-H., Surratt, J. D., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Luecken, D. J., Hutzell, W. T.,
Jaoui, M., Offenberg, J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., and Edney,
E. O.: Epoxide Pathways Improve Model Predictions of Isoprene Markers and
Reveal Key Role of Acidity in Aerosol Formation, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
47, 11056–11064, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402106h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es402106h</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Pye, H. O. T., Murphy, B. N., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Carlton, A. G., Guo, H., Weber, R., Vasilakos, P., Appel, K. W., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Surratt, J. D., Nenes, A., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Misztal, P. K., and Goldstein, A. H.: On the implications of aerosol liquid water and phase separation for organic aerosol mass, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 343–369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-343-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-343-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, M., Murphy, B. N., Isaacs, K. K., McDonald, B. C., Lu, Q., McKeen, S.
A., Koval, L., Robinson, A. L., Efstathiou, C., Allen, C., and Pye, H. O.
T.: Criteria pollutant impacts of volatile chemical products informed by
near-field modelling, Nat. Sustain., 4, 129–137,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00614-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00614-1</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Ryerson, T. B., Andrews, A. E., Angevine, W. M., Bates, T. S., Brock, C. A.,
Cairns, B., Cohen, R. C., Cooper, O. R., de Gouw, J. A., Fehsenfeld, F. C.,
Ferrare, R. A., Fischer, M. L., Flagan, R. C., Goldstein, A. H., Hair, J.
W., Hardesty, R. M., Hostetler, C. A., Jimenez, J. L., Langford, A. O.,
McCauley, E., McKeen, S. A., Molina, L. T., Nenes, A., Oltmans, S. J., Parrish, D. D., Pederson, J. R., Pierce, R. B., Prather, K., Quinn, P. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Senff, C. J., Sorooshian, A., Stutz, J., Surratt, J. D., Trainer, M., Volkamer, R., Williams, E. J., and Wofsy, S. C.: The 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5830–5866, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50331" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50331</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Santoni, G. W., Daube, B. C., Kort, E. A., Jiménez, R., Park, S., Pittman, J. V., Gottlieb, E., Xiang, B., Zahniser, M. S., Nelson, D. D., McManus, J. B., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Holloway, J. S., Andrews, A. E., Sweeney, C., Hall, B., Hintsa, E. J., Moore, F. L., Elkins, J. W., Hurst, D. F., Stephens, B. B., Bent, J., and Wofsy, S. C.: Evaluation of the airborne quantum cascade laser spectrometer (QCLS) measurements of the carbon and greenhouse gas suite – CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, and CO – during the CalNex and HIPPO campaigns, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1509–1526, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1509-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1509-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, 3rd edn., in: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Seltzer, K. M., Pennington, E., Rao, V., Murphy, B. N., Strum, M., Isaacs, K. K., and Pye, H. O. T.: Reactive organic carbon emissions from volatile chemical products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5079–5100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5079-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5079-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Shah, R. U., Coggon, M. M., Gkatzelis, G. I., McDonald, B. C., Tasoglou, A.,
Huber, H., Gilman, J., Warneke, C., Robinson, A. L., and Presto, A. A.:
Urban Oxidation Flow Reactor Measurements Reveal Significant Secondary
Organic Aerosol Contributions from Volatile Emissions of Emerging
Importance, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 714–725, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06531" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06531</a>, 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Shah, T., Shi, Y., Beardsley, R., and Yarwood, G.: Speciation Tool User's Guide Version 5.0, Ramboll US Corporation, Novato, California, 41 pp.,  2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., and Barker, D.: A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3
(NCAR/TN-475+STR), University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, 113 pp.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
U.S. EPA: Air Quality System (AQS), U.S. EPA [data set], available at:
<a href="https://www.epa.gov/aqs" target="_blank"/> (last access: 4 February 2021), 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
U.S. EPA: National Emissions Inventory (NEI), U.S. EPA [code], available at:
<a href="https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/national-emissions-inventory-nei" target="_blank"/> (last access: 23 June 2021),
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
U.S. EPA: AE7I Species Table, U.S. EPA [code], available at:
<a href="https://github.com/USEPA/CMAQ/blob/72ec4e5681e1ed0b4917792a9a240b0302a303a7/CCTM/src/MECHS/mechanism_information/saprc07tic_ae7i_aq/AE7I_species_table.md" target="_blank"/> (last access: 23 June 2021), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
U.S. EPA: CMAQ, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4081737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4081737</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
U.S. EPA: Reactive Organic Carbon Emissions from Volatile Chemical Products, U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD) [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.23719/1520157" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.23719/1520157</a>​​​​​​​, 2021a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
U.S. EPA: Data for Modeling secondary organic aerosol formation from volatile chemical products, U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD) [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.23719/1522655" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.23719/1522655</a>, 2021b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, D.-G., Norwood, W., Alaee, M., Byer, J. D., and Brimble, S.: Review of
recent advances in research on the toxicity, detection, occurrence and fate
of cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes in the environment, Chemosphere, 93,
711–725, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.041</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Wang, H., Tan, Y., Liu, J., Wang, K., Ji, W., Sun, L., Yu, X.,
Zhao, J., Xu, B., and Xiong, J.: Measurement of the key parameters of VOC
emissions from wooden furniture, and the impact of temperature. Atmos.
Environ., 259, 118510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118510" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118510</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Warneke, C., Veres, P., Holloway, J. S., Stutz, J., Tsai, C., Alvarez, S., Rappenglueck, B., Fehsenfeld, F. C., Graus, M., Gilman, J. B., and de Gouw, J. A.: Airborne formaldehyde measurements using PTR-MS: calibration, humidity dependence, inter-comparison and initial results, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2345–2358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2345-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2345-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Woody, M. C., Baker, K. R., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Koo, B., and Pye, H. O. T.: Understanding sources of organic aerosol during CalNex-2010 using the CMAQ-VBS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4081–4100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Y. and Johnston, M. V.: Aerosol Formation from OH Oxidation of the
Volatile Cyclic Methyl Siloxane (cVMS) Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 4445–4451,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00655" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00655</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, Y., Paulot, F., Carter, W. P. L., Nolte, C. G., Luecken, D. J., Hutzell, W. T., Wennberg, P. O., Cohen, R. C., and Pinder, R. W.: Understanding the impact of recent advances in isoprene photooxidation on simulations of regional air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8439–8455, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8439-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8439-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Ulbrich, I., Alfarra, M. R., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Sun, Y. L.,
Dzepina, K., Dunlea, E., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P. F., Salcedo, D., Onasch,
T., Jayne, J. T., Miyoshi, T., Shimono, A., Hatakeyama, S., Takegawa, N.,
Kondo, Y., Schneider J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian,
K., Williams, P., Bower, K., Bahreini, R., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R. J.,
Rautiainen, J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Ubiquity and
dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in
anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029979" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029979</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., Tkacik, D. S., de Gouw, J. A.,
Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., Borbon, A., and Robinson, A. L.:
Intermediate-Volatility Organic Compounds: A Large Source of Secondary
Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 13743–13750,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5035188" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es5035188</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Nguyen, N. T., Presto, A. A., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., and
Robinson, A. L.: Intermediate Volatility Organic Compound Emissions from
On-Road Diesel Vehicles: Chemical Composition, Emission Factors, and
Estimated Secondary Organic Aerosol Production, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
49, 11516–11526, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02841" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02841</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
