<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-17727-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Quantifying the structural uncertainty of the aerosol mixing state representation in a modal model</article-title><alt-title>The aerosol mixing state representation in a modal model</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{The aerosol mixing state representation in a modal model}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Z. Zheng et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Zhonghua</given-names></name>
          <email>zhonghua.zheng@outlook.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0642-650X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>West</surname><given-names>Matthew</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7605-0050</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Lei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6481-3786</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Po-Lun</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3109-5316</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Xiaohong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Riemer</surname><given-names>Nicole</given-names></name>
          <email>nriemer@illinois.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3220-3457</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Texas A&amp;M University, College Station, TX, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Nicole Riemer (nriemer@illinois.edu) and Zhonghua Zheng (zhonghua.zheng@outlook.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>23</issue>
      <fpage>17727</fpage><lpage>17741</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e163">Aerosol mixing state is an important emergent property that affects
aerosol radiative forcing and aerosol–cloud interactions, but it has
not been easy to constrain this property globally. This study aims to
verify the global distribution of aerosol mixing state represented by
modal models. To quantify the aerosol mixing state, we used the
aerosol mixing state indices for submicron aerosol based on the mixing
of optically absorbing and non-absorbing species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
the mixing of primary carbonaceous and non-primary carbonaceous
species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the mixing of hygroscopic and
non-hygroscopic species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). To achieve a
spatiotemporal comparison, we calculated the mixing state indices
using output from the Community Earth System Model with the
four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4)
and compared the results with the mixing state indices
from a benchmark machine-learned model trained on high-detail
particle-resolved simulations from the particle-resolved stochastic
aerosol model PartMC-MOSAIC.
The two methods yielded very different spatial patterns of the mixing
state indices. In some regions, the yearly averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value
computed by the MAM4 model differed by up to 70 percentage points
from the benchmark values. These errors tended to be zonally
structured, with the MAM4 model predicting a more internally mixed
aerosol at low latitudes and a more externally mixed aerosol at high
latitudes compared to the benchmark.
Our study quantifies potential model bias in simulating mixing state
in different regions and provides insights into potential
improvements to model process representation for a more realistic
simulation of aerosols towards better quantification of radiative
forcing and aerosol–cloud interactions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e215">The direct and indirect climate effects of atmospheric aerosols
greatly depend on the particles' spatial distribution in the
atmosphere and their climate-relevant properties, including their
hygroscopicity, optical properties, and their ability to act as cloud
condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice nuclei <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.1"/>. These
properties, in turn, are closely related to the aerosol mixing state
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.2"/>. Aerosol
mixing state refers to the way in which different aerosol chemical
species are distributed among and within the aerosol particles
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.3"/>. As shown in many observational field studies,
atmospheric aerosols have complex mixing states
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.4"/>, ranging
between the two extremes of an “internal mixture”, where the
composition of all particles within the population is identical (and
equal to the bulk composition of the aerosol), and an “external
mixture”, where each particle in a population consists of only a
single species (which may be different for each particle).</p>
      <p id="d1e230">This poses a unique challenge for the modeling of aerosols in Earth
system models, which, for the sake of computational<?pagebreak page17728?> efficiency,
represent aerosols by simplifying the true aerosol mixing state using
various mixing-state-related assumptions. For example, bulk aerosol
models predict the abundance of individual aerosol chemical species by
tracking the species' mass concentrations, inherently treating the
aerosol as external mixtures of, e.g., sulfate, black carbon, organic
carbon, sea salt, and dust <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.5"/>. Univariate sectional models are able to represent size-resolved composition but cannot
resolve the diversity of the aerosol within a certain size range. For
modal models, the ability to resolve mixing state depends on the
definition and the placement of the modes. Different approaches for
modal models have been developed, ranging from a small number of
internally mixed, non-overlapping modes (e.g., three modes in MAM3,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="altparen.6"/>; or CMAQv5.2, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="altparen.7"/>) to a larger number of
modes that may overlap in a given size range and separate out
different aerosol mixtures (e.g., nine modes in MADE3,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="altparen.8"/>; or 16 modes in MATRIX, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="altparen.9"/>). For
these multi-modal models, the aerosol processes of gas–aerosol
partitioning and coagulation make it necessary to define rules for how
the modes interact <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.10"/>. Condensation of secondary
aerosol on a mode reserved for a pure species (e.g., black carbon or
dust) requires moving mass over to a mixed mode when a critical
mass fraction of secondary aerosol is exceeded. Transfer terms due to
coagulation of particles in different modes can be calculated
analytically <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.11"/>, and rules need to be defined
regarding the destination mode after coagulation.
Generally, the transfer of aerosol mass from smaller modes
to larger modes during growth can lead to inaccuracies.
The removal of particles due to scavenging by cloud activation
is another issue that is difficult to reconcile.
Hence, the choice of
the number of modes, their compositions, and the criteria for transfer
between modes are user-defined, which introduces structural
uncertainty in aerosol simulations that still needs to be quantified.</p>
      <p id="d1e255">Given that modal models are to some extent mixing-state-aware, the
following question arises: how well do modal models represent mixing state? Due
to the scarcity of relevant observational data, we are not yet at the
point where we can comprehensively validate model output of aerosol
mixing state as is done for other aerosol-related quantities, such as
bulk mass concentrations or aerosol optical depth. However,
higher-detail models can serve as benchmarks to perform a verification
of simulated aerosol mixing state. This paper aims to verify the
global distribution of aerosol mixing state represented by a modal
model by using benchmark simulations from the particle-resolved
stochastic aerosol model PartMC-MOSAIC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.12"/>. Our usage of the term “aerosol
representation” in this paper encompasses the representation of
processes that go along with the aerosol representation itself,
since the two are in practice tightly coupled.</p>
      <p id="d1e261">We used the aerosol mixing state index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.13"/> as a metric to quantify aerosol mixing state. The
mixing state index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be interpreted as a label for
particle populations to rigorously characterize where the population
lies on the spectrum from external (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) to internal
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) mixture. This concept has been successfully applied to
observational data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.14"/> and for error
quantification studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.15"/>. Particularly
relevant for this work is the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.16"/>, which
showed that assuming an internal mixture when the aerosol is actually
not completely internally mixed can result in errors of up to 150 % in
CCN predictions.</p>
      <p id="d1e316">PartMC-MOSAIC tracks the composition of individual particles and
therefore resolves aerosol mixing state explicitly
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.17"/>. However, this modeling approach is
computationally very expensive and therefore not practical for
large-scale simulations of several months or years of simulation
time. To estimate the global spatial distribution of mixing state, we
recently developed a machine-learned (ML) model based on
high-detail particle-resolved simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.18"/> that
uses inputs that are known from global model simulations to predict
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this paper, we use this ML model to predict the
spatial distribution of the mixing index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and then compare the
results with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values that are derived from the Community Earth
System Model version 2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.19"><named-content content-type="pre">CESM2 version 2.1.0;</named-content></xref>
using the four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">MAM4;</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e357">This paper is organized as follows. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> we
introduce the setup of the Earth system model simulations. The
definition of mixing state indices and the derivation of
aerosol mixing state indices for modal models are given in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>.
Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> briefly describes the
ML model generated with machine learning and particle-resolved
modeling for estimating the benchmark aerosol mixing state
indices. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/> focuses on the comparison of mixing
state indices from the particle-resolved and modal models, and
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/> summarizes our findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Global model simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e378">Here we employed CESM2 to provide the
global model simulation data. Specifically, we used the component set
FHIST to set up the global simulations with aerosols. This
component set represents a typical historical simulation in the
Community Atmospheric Model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.21"><named-content content-type="pre">CAM6;</named-content></xref> using
an active atmosphere and land with prescribed sea-surface temperatures
and sea-ice extent, as well as a 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> finite-volume dycore with the
forcing data available from 1979 to 2015.</p>
      <?pagebreak page17729?><p id="d1e395">MAM4 is the default aerosol module of this component set, which
represents the aerosol size distribution with four lognormal modes
(Aitken, accumulation, coarse, and primary carbon
modes; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="altparen.22"/>). MAM4 tracks six aerosol species, and these are
distributed over the four modes as follows. The Aitken mode consists
of dust, sulfate, secondary organic aerosol (SOA), and sea salt. The
accumulation mode includes sulfate, SOA, sea salt, primary organic
matter (POM), black carbon (BC), and dust. The coarse mode contains
sulfate, dust, and sea salt. The primary carbon mode contains only BC
and POM, which are supplied by primary aerosol emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e401">The choice of modes in MAM4 is motivated by the desire to treat the
microphysical aging of the primary carbonaceous aerosols in the
atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.23"/> similar to other modal models used in
regional or global models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.24"/>. In MAM4,
mass and number concentrations of BC and POM in the primary carbon
mode are transferred to the accumulation mode by the processes of
intermodal coagulation and condensation of SOA and sulfuric acid onto
the primary carbon mode. The accumulation mode then represents aged BC
and POM, as these species are internally mixed with other aerosol
species. The MAM4 treatment of aging is critical for improving the
long-range transport of carbonaceous aerosols to remote regions such
as the polar region, which suffered from a low bias in a prior version
of the model when only three internally mixed modes were used
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.25"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e413">We ran the model for the year 2011 with 6 years (2005–2010) of
spinup. The simulation was conducted at a resolution of 0.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
latitude by 1.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude along with emission inventories
from CMIP6 emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.26"/>. We stored the instantaneous
outputs every 3 h during the simulation, which yields
2920 timestamps for each surface-layer grid cell for the entire year
of simulation time. The surface layer was chosen to be in line with
the PartMC-MOSAIC model scenarios that were used as training data for
the ML models of mixing
state indices (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>) and which
were designed to represent conditions in the planetary boundary layer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Aerosol mixing state indices: definition and calculation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Particle-based aerosol mixing state index</title>
      <p id="d1e454">The mixing state index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.27"/> quantifies where an
aerosol population lies on the continuum from external to internal
mixing – that is, how spread out the chemical species are over an
aerosol population. We will focus here on the mixing state of
submicron aerosols (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) due to their relevance for light
scattering and absorption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.28"/> and their contribution
to CCN formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.29"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e482">To summarize, the mixing state index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by the affine
ratio of the average particle species diversity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
bulk population species diversity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M20" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e549">The diversities <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are calculated as follows.
First, the per-particle mixing entropies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are determined for each
particle by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M24" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of distinct aerosol species and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass
fraction of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. These values are then averaged
(mass-weighted) over the entire population to obtain the average
particle species diversity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M30" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of particles in the population and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass fraction of particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the population. Finally, the
bulk diversity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M35" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bulk mass fraction of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the population.</p>
      <p id="d1e881">Note that the definition of “species” for calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
based on application needs. It can be based on operationally defined
chemical species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.30"/>, elemental composition
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.31"/>, or species groups such as volatile
and nonvolatile species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.32"/> or hygroscopic and
non-hygroscopic species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.33"/>. Other
possibilities include the propensity for aerosols to undergo
heterogeneous reactions, quantified by the heterogeneous reaction rate coefficient for a
specific reaction. In this paper we consider three different
definitions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which we explain in more detail in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Mode-based aerosol mixing state index</title>
      <?pagebreak page17730?><p id="d1e921">The framework laid out in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>
can be easily generalized to a modal modeling framework
(see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). The bulk
mixing entropy, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the bulk diversity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
can be calculated using the bulk mass fractions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
from the MAM4 simulation and Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) and
(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>). To calculate the average particle mixing entropy,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the average particle species diversity,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we use

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M46" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>7</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>9</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass fraction of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the mass fraction of mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the population, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the
per-mode mixing entropies. Finally, the mixing state index, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
can be calculated using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). Note
that Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>) are analogous to
Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>). A detailed derivation of
these equations is provided in the Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1190">Illustration of the mode-based calculation of the aerosol mixing
state index. The coarse mode is removed because only modes dominated by
submicron particles are used for calculations.
Note that the Aitken mode mass fraction is very low
compared to the other modes and the caption does not obscure any
data.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17727/2021/acp-21-17727-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1199">In this study, we consider the mixing states of submicron aerosols
including the Aitken, accumulation, and primary carbon modes, and we do
not include the coarse mode because the coarse particles are above 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Since the mixing entropies are mass-weighted (rather than
number-weighted), the mixing state index is more representative of the
modes with the larger particles, i.e., the accumulation and primary carbon
modes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Grouped surrogate species</title>
      <p id="d1e1218">Here we compare and contrast the aerosol mixing state indices defined in
three different ways, namely based on the mixing of optically absorbing
and non-absorbing species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), based on the mixing of primary
carbonaceous and non-primary carbonaceous species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
and based on the mixing of hygroscopic and non-hygroscopic species
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> shows the definitions of
these aerosol mixing state indices.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1258">Aerosol mixing state index definitions. Six aerosol species
(bc: black carbon, dst: dust, ncl: sea salt, pom: primary organic
matter, soa: secondary organic aerosol, so4: sulfate) are used in
calculating the aerosol mixing state indices based on different
species groupings. The mixing state indices <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are based on two grouped surrogate
species.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol mixing state index (symbol)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center">Grouped species </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Optical property (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(bc)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(pom, dst, ncl, soa, so4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Primary carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(bc, pom)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(dst, ncl, soa, so4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hygroscopicity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(bc, pom, dst)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(ncl, soa, so4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1389">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we considered two surrogate species: black
carbon (strongly absorbing, assigned a mass absorption coefficient in
CESM2 at 533 nm and 0 % RH of 8.144 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the five
other aerosol species grouped together (less absorbing or
non-absorbing, with mass absorption coefficients in CESM2 at
533 nm and 0 % RH of 0.1442, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.975</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.703</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for POM, SOA, dust, sea salt, and
sulfate, respectively). Thus, a lower value in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
refers to the case where the strongly absorbing species black carbon
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.34"/> and the sum of the other species (termed
“non-absorbing” here for convenience) are more externally mixed.</p>
      <p id="d1e1532">The index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is motivated by the primary carbon
treatment of MAM4, where the primary particulate organic matter and
black carbon are assigned to a separate primary carbon mode
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.35"/>. A lower value in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the
situation where the primary carbonaceous species and all other species
exist separately in different particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e1561">Similarly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also calculated from two surrogate
species. We combined black carbon, primary organic matter, and dust as
one surrogate species, given their comparatively lower
hygroscopicities (kappa values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 0.068,
respectively). Accordingly, NaCl (1.16), SOA (0.14), and sulfate
(0.507) were grouped as the other surrogate species. Here, a lower
value in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the case where hygroscopic and
non-hygroscopic species tend to be present in separate particles.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Machine-learned models of mixing state indices</title>
      <p id="d1e1615">Aerosol mixing state indices can be calculated directly using
particle-resolved modeling, but this comes with large computational
costs. Alternatively, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.36"/> developed ML
models, which integrate machine learning and
particle-resolved aerosol simulations to estimate aerosol mixing state
indices. To generate the training and testing data sets for developing
such ML models, an ensemble of particle-resolved model
scenarios was created using the particle-resolved model PartMC-MOSAIC
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.37"/>. In brief, PartMC-MOSAIC simulates
individual aerosol particles within a representative volume of air,
including stochastic coagulation, particle-phase thermodynamics, gas-
and particle-phase chemistries, and dynamic gas–particle mass
transfer. Thus, the composition of the individual particles within a
population evolves dynamically, and assumptions about mixing state are
not necessary.</p>
      <p id="d1e1624">The strategy to generate the data was to vary the input parameters (45
in total) for the PartMC-MOSAIC model, including primary emissions of
different aerosol types (e.g., carbonaceous aerosol and dust
emissions, including contribution from Aitken mode, accumulation
mode, and coarse mode size ranges), primary emissions of gas phase
species (e.g., SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and various volatile organic
compounds), and meteorological parameters (see Table 1 in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="altparen.38"/>, for more information).  For instance, to vary the
gas emissions, scaling factors were sampled from 0 % to 200 % for
different gas species, based on the emission rates in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.39"/>. A Latin hypercube sampling approach was employed
to sample the parameter space efficiently for the training and testing
data sets. We note that new particle formation and growth was
not simulated explicitly, but Aitken mode sulfate particles were
introduced into the simulation by emission for a subset of scenarios
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.40"/> as a proxy for having particles present that
originate from new particle formation. While PartMC-MOSAIC includes
the process of new particle formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.41"/>, the reason
for this simplification was that considerable uncertainty exists
regarding the subsequent growth of the freshly nucleated particles
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.42"/>, which poses a challenge for a highly detailed
aerosol model such as PartMC-MOSAIC. Errors in representing this
particle type adequately may result in underestimating the abundance
of BC-free particles in some regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.43"/> and thereby
overestimating the degree of internal mixture. This would imply that
the error in the MAM4 simulations is even larger than currently
indicated. Other processes that are not<?pagebreak page17731?> explicitly included
in generating training data are aerosol removal by
nucleation-scavenging and other cloud processes. However, for the
purpose of this study, the emphasis is on the aerosol state, i.e.,
having a sufficiently comprehensive set of aerosol populations that
can serve as training data, not necessarily that all the processes
are included.</p>
      <p id="d1e1664">The ML models were derived by the machine learning algorithm
eXtreme Gradient Boosting <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.44"><named-content content-type="pre">XGBoost;</named-content></xref>
from 45 000 particle populations. Each ML model was a tree-based
ensemble model that could handle complex nonlinear interactions
and collinearity among features. The hyperparameters were
determined by grid search with 10-fold cross-validation.
The ML models can be expressed as
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M82" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mixing state index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at location <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
model layer nearest the surface at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the
function for calculating the corresponding mixing state index
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The set names <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (aerosol), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (gas), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(environmental) represent the predictors (features) used for
predicting the mixing state index.
The choice of features is determined by the overlap of variables that
are present in both PartMC-MOSAIC and CESM2.
Aerosol species include black
carbon, mineral dust, sea salt, primary organic aerosol, secondary
organic aerosol, and sulfate. Of note is that we used the bulk (not
the per-mode) concentrations of submicron aerosol species as the
features. The gas species include dimethyl sulfide, hydrogen peroxide,
sulfuric acid, ozone, semi-volatile organic gas, and sulfur
dioxide. The environmental variables are air temperature, relative
humidity, and solar zenith angle.  Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> shows
the performance of the ML models when predicting the mixing state
indices.  The mixing state calculation in this study was purely based
on the above six aerosol species (excluding other aerosol species) for
a fair comparison with the mode-based aerosol mixing state index,
which resulted in slightly different performance of the ML model
compared to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.45"/>. The average error of the ML model
(using the hold-out testing samples) is
about 5 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 8 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (measured by mean absolute error).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1934">Predictive performance of the ML models using the
testing data set. Metrics include the mean absolute error (MAE),
root-mean-square error (RMSE), median absolute deviation (MAD), index of
agreement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="altparen.46"/>), Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC),
and coefficient of determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MAE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RMSE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MAD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PCC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7" align="center">XGBoost ML models </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.048</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.072</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.030</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.974</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.953</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.906</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.079</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.107</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.056</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.955</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.916</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.836</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.082</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.112</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.057</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.955</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.916</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.835</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2136">We would like to emphasize that this ML modeling framework cannot
compensate for any biases that the global model (here CESM2) might have in
simulating the quantities that serve as the features. Instead, what we can
expect from this approach is that it provides the most likely mixing
state associated with the species concentrations that CESM2 simulates.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page17732?><sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Quantitative comparison of mode-based and particle-based mixing state indices</title>
      <p id="d1e2156">Let <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
denote the mixing state indices computed by the ML model
and by the MAM4 model for each grid cell at timestamp <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. The corresponding time-averaged values for a certain time
interval and for each grid cell are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here we consider the full year
as the time-averaging interval. An analysis of the seasonal variation of
mixing state indices can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.47"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2244">To compare the annual mean values, we calculated the mean difference
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the mean absolute difference
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each grid cell of the layer closest
to the surface:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M112" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>11</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E12"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>12</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where the subscript <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the mixing state index
(o, c, or h), and the total number of
timestamps is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2920</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since it only makes sense to quantify mixing
state when at least two species are present in a given location, areas
where the mass fraction of any one surrogate species was higher than 99 % for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (due to the low mass fraction of black carbon) and
97.5 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were ignored for
the calculation and appear as hatched areas in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. We will first discuss the overall
probability density functions of these quantities
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) and then their spatial distributions
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2535">Probability density functions of annual averaged mixing state
indices using the MAM4 model and ML model.
The thin black lines refer to their mean values.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17727/2021/acp-21-17727-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2547">Global distribution of annually averaged mixing state indices
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using
the ML model, MAM4 model, their mean difference
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>), and mean absolute difference
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>). Areas are hatched where the mass fraction of any
one surrogate species was higher than 99 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (due to the
low mass fraction of black carbon) and 97.5 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17727/2021/acp-21-17727-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2653">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows the probability density functions
of the annual averaged mixing state indices computed by the ML
model (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>),
by MAM4 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>), their average difference
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>),
and their average absolute difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for each surface-layer grid cell. The results show large discrepancies
in mixing state indices between the ML model and the MAM4
model, without a clear relationship between them (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d–f).</p>
      <p id="d1e2732">The annual average of the mixing state index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
estimated by the ML model,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranged between 55 % and
96 %, with a mean of 73 %. Calculated by the MAM4 model,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> varied spatially from 46 %
to 99.76 %, with a higher mean of 86 %. The similar mean values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (14 %) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (18 %) were caused by higher
values in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is confirmed below with
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. The averaged mixing state index
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged between 31 % and 84 %
with a mean of 54 %, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
had a wider range (from 9 % to 99.81 %) with a mean (of 58 %).
Similarly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from
21 % to 81 % with a mean of 58 %, while
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> varied between 10 % and
99.85 % with a mean of 63 %. The large discrepancy between the mean
difference (4.8 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and 4.7 % for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) and mean absolute difference (30 %
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and 38 % for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicates that the errors in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were symmetric (positive and negative)
but large. The maximal errors in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> between the two methods were
up to 59 and 76 percentage points, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e3055">The implications of these discrepancies are more easily discussed with
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, which illustrates the global spatial
distribution of annually averaged mixing state indices predicted by
the ML model (first column), MAM4 (second column), their
mean difference (third column), and their mean absolute difference
(fourth column). The differences in mixing state indices between the
ML model and MAM4 varied strongly across the globe.</p>
      <p id="d1e3060">High values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred in
the continental regions (77 %) compared to oceans
(69 %). Specifically, the ML model predicted high values for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in central Africa (20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
12–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), the Arctic (66.5–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), and southern Asia
(5–38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 60–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). These are also the regions with
relatively larger mass fractions of black carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %; see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F8"/>). The mixing state index
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a higher degree of internal
mixing over the globe (with a median of 90 %) compared to the ML
model. The only exceptions were oceans in the Northern
Hemisphere at the mid-latitudes (45–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, dominated by sea
salt, sulfate, and secondary organic aerosol in the accumulation mode)
and Antarctica (66.5–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, dominated by sea salt and sulfate
in the accumulation mode as well as sulfate in Aitken mode), where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> was 75 %. Qualitatively,
the MAM4 model captured the trend that areas with high black carbon
concentration (defined here as concentrations above the 95 %
percentile) tended to have higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p>
      <p id="d1e3222">The ML model estimate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> suggested a rather
homogeneous spatial distribution of the annually averaged mixing
state, with values of approximately 50 %. Compared to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> values were lower (primary
carbonaceous aerosol more externally mixed) at high latitudes and
higher at low and mid-latitudes (primary carbonaceous aerosol more
internally mixed). Note that, while
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> values were similar in the
Arctic and Antarctic, the abundance of primary carbonaceous species
was predicted to be higher in the Arctic compared to the Antarctic (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F8"/>).</p>
      <?pagebreak page17733?><p id="d1e3298">The spatial distributions of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> were similar to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. That is, the MAM4 model
predicted that the hygroscopic species and non-hygroscopic species
were more externally mixed at high latitudes and more internally mixed
at low latitudes. In contrast, the spatial distribution of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> shows qualitative differences
compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> in two
aspects. First, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> was higher
than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> at high latitudes,
meaning that hygroscopic species and non-hygroscopic appeared more
internally mixed than primary carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous
species in this region. Second, areas over the North Atlantic Ocean
(0–20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 20–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), southern Africa (5–32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,
5–20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), and Australia (10–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 100–140<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)
appeared rather externally mixed. These are areas where mineral dust is
the dominant aerosol species (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F8"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3461">These two facts lead to the overall finding that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
exhibits the largest differences between the two methods. This applies
especially to regions where mineral dust was the dominant aerosol
species, which points to an important structural issue of the
four-mode setup used in MAM4. While the ML
model predicted a more external mixture in these regions (dust
externally mixed from sea salt and other species), the MAM4 model
could not represent this because the accumulation mode included
all six aerosol species in an internal
mixture. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> illustrates the
relationship of the mean absolute difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the mass fraction of dust for all model grid points. It confirms that
grid points with large dust mass fractions were associated with larger
mean absolute differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These results confirm
the tradeoff discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.48"/>: MAM3 (and MAM4 in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="altparen.49"/>) intentionally combines dust and sea salt in the
same mode to reduce the computational burden; however,<?pagebreak page17734?> this
simplification does not always realistically reflect the aerosol
mixing state in the ambient atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e3506">It is interesting to note that the areas where sea salt is present,
but not dust, are <italic>not</italic> associated with large errors, even though
sea salt – just like mineral dust – is a primary aerosol type. The
reason for this lies in our surrogate species definitions
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) for computing the mixing state index.
Based on our mixing state definitions, sea salt, secondary organic aerosol,
and sulfate are always grouped together.
Therefore, none of the mixing state indices as defined here
tell us how externally mixed sea salt is when it is considered as a
single aerosol type.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3516">Dependence of mean absolute difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on
dust mass fractions for all model
grid points.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17727/2021/acp-21-17727-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3536">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> further demonstrates the zonal mean annual
aerosol mixing state indices, highlighting that differences between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tended to be zonally
structured, where the MAM4 model overestimated at low latitudes,
while it underestimated at high latitudes relative to the ML model.
In contrast, the MAM4 model overestimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
all latitudes north of 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3586">Zonal mean annual aerosol mixing state indices <bold>(a)</bold>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
using the MAM4 model and ML model. The bands refer to the standard
deviation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17727/2021/acp-21-17727-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Interpretation of findings</title>
      <p id="d1e3646">From Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS1"/>, the following picture emerges: MAM4
overestimates the mixing state index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> except in regions
at high latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere. At the same time,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are overestimated at low latitudes to
mid-latitudes and underestimated at high latitudes. These findings
point towards too rapid a transfer from the carbonaceous mode to the
accumulation mode at low latitudes to mid-latitudes and too slow a transfer at
high latitudes.</p>
      <p id="d1e3684">To conceptually illustrate these relationships, here we use
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as examples and contrast the
conditions for high and low
latitudes. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a–f show
conditions representative of high latitudes. A grid cell sampled from
the CESM2/MAM4 simulation (73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 151<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) contains 15 %
BC and 37 % POM, distributed over the accumulation and primary carbon
mode as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and d. The
corresponding value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
80 %. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b depicts particle
population that was sampled from the MAM4 population in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a. All particles,
except for the smallest ones (corresponding to Aitken mode particles),
contain BC, which results in the relatively high mixing state index
value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that in MAM4 BC is not included in the
Aitken mode by definition. Considering the same particle population,
but now evaluating the mixing state metric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
quantifies the degree of mixing of primary carbon and other species,
yields the following observation. The entire primary carbon mode, by definition,
consists of POM and BC, which results in an appreciable number of
particles that contain only primary carbon (BC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> POM), giving a mixing
state index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of only 27 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e3788">We now compare the MAM4-sampled particle populations above to
particle populations that were sampled from our
PartMC scenario library. We searched for populations with
similar mass fractions of BC and POM as in the MAM4 populations and
that were simulated at a similar latitude as the grid point location
of the CESM2/MAM4 model
output. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c shows that the PartMC
results have comparatively more BC-free particles, and
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>f shows that comparatively more
particles are mixtures of primary carbon and other species. Overall,
this means that in MAM4 BC appears too internally mixed (because
irrespective of whether BC is placed in the primary carbon or
accumulation mode, it is by design mixed with other species) and that
at high latitudes the primary carbon mode is not transferring mass to
the accumulation mode as quickly as is the case in PartMC simulations.</p>
      <p id="d1e3795">The reason why MAM4 behaves in this way can be explained by the aging
process treatment in MAM4. Aging in MAM4 is formulated using a
threshold criteria. That is, BC and POA mass is transferred from the
primary carbon mode to the accumulation mode when a certain threshold
of sulfate and SOA has condensed. In MAM4 this threshold is set to a
relatively large value. This is done to prevent BC from being removed
too quickly by wet deposition – because the primary carbon mode has a
lower hygroscopicity than the accumulation mode and thus a lower wet
scavenging efficiency – thereby counteracting a low bias in BC
concentrations in the Arctic regions. From <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.50"/> we
already know that using such a high threshold may not be
appropriate. However, the global model also has biases in other
processes that contribute to the low BC bias in the Arctic, and
setting the threshold to a high value compensates for these
errors. Our results are a reflection of this fact. While
adjusting the threshold criteria in MAM4 to a lower value may
improve the agreement with the ML simulations in some regions, it
may deteriorate the overall results in other areas. This is a good
example how structural uncertainty manifests itself, namely by the
fact that adjusting a parameter does not fundamentally fix the
issue.</p>
      <?pagebreak page17735?><p id="d1e3802">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>g–l show conditions
representative of low latitudes. A grid cell sampled from the
CESM2/MAM4 simulation (20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) contains
11 % BC and 24 % POM, distributed over the accumulation and primary
carbon mode as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>g and
j, with most of the mass in the accumulation mode. The corresponding
value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is therefore 99 %, an almost complete
internal mixture. For the same reason, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also very
high. Similarly to the high-latitude case,
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>i and l show that the comparable
PartMC population has comparatively more BC-free particles and more particles
that contain very low amounts of primary carbonaceous material,
leading to lower values of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
compared to the MAM4 results.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3876">Illustration to explain the differences in mixing state
representation between MAM4 and the ML model at high and low
latitudes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17727/2021/acp-21-17727-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Comparison to observational data</title>
      <p id="d1e3893">The question that arises from Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS1"/>
and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS2"/> is of course the following: which spatial distribution
of aerosol mixing state reflects reality more closely? The validation
of simulated mixing state indices with observational data is still
challenging since per-particle mass fractions of species are required
for calculating the mixing state indices (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>). These are in principle
obtainable from in situ deployments of single-particle mass
spectrometers or by using electron microscopy techniques, but their
quantitative derivation comes with challenges and is not routinely
done, so that only very few data sets exist that allow for a meaningful
comparison <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.51"/>.  Keeping these limitations in mind,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.52"/> reported a qualitative comparison of available
measurements of mixing state metrics in locations in developed
countries (Paris, France; Pittsburgh, USA; various locations in Japan)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.53"/> with seasonally averaged
results from the ML model based on particle-resolved simulations. This
showed that the ML model was able to capture the range of values that
is consistent with the observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e3912">We further compared the ML model estimates using recent observations
from China. Specifically, we compared <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values from Taizhou
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.54"/> and Beijing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.55"/> derived from Single Particle Soot Photometer (SP2) measurements. For both locations,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> overestimated the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was in the range of the
observations.  Specifically, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measured at a suburban site
Taizhou from 26 May to 18 June 2017 ranged from 62 % to 82 %. During
the same time period (but in the year 2011), the values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were between 63 % and 84 %, while
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was between 84 % and 96 %.  The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values at the urban site of Beijing ranged between 55 % and
70 % in winter (from 10 November to 10 December 2016) and varied
between 60 % and 75 % in summer (from 18 May to 25 June 2017). Using
our simulations of the year 2011, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
varied from 60 % to 88 % in winter and from 59 % to 83 % in summer. As
a comparison, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 92 % to
97 % in winter and from 87 % to 95 % in summer.  A caveat when
comparing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, with the observations
reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.56"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.57"/> is that the
definition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ML</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> included BC-free particles, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
in the measurements by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.58"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.59"/> were
calculated only considering the subpopulation of BC-containing
particles. This might introduce a bias in the mixing state
index between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> index used in this paper and the
observations (depending on the fraction of the BC-free particles
present at any given location).</p>
      <p id="d1e4157">We can also relate our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> index qualitatively to the
SP2 measurements in the Finnish Arctic
during winter 2011–2012 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.60"/>. Although this
study did not provide quantitative mixing state index calculations, it
is an important finding that BC-containing particles (with various
amounts of coatings) co-existed with BC-free particles. As we saw in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS2"/>, this condition can easily be
represented with a particle-resolved approach. However, the modal
model with modes configured as in MAM4 puts black carbon in all
accumulation-sized particles
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), which is not consistent
with the observations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4187">In this paper we present a framework for evaluating the error in
submicron aerosol mixing state induced by aerosol representation
assumptions, which is one of the important contributors to structural
uncertainty in aerosol models. We<?pagebreak page17736?> quantitatively compared mixing state
indices for submicron aerosol predicted by the modal model MAM4 within
the global model CESM to a machine-learned model
based on high-detail particle-resolved simulations. We focused on the
mixing of optically absorbing and non-absorbing species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
the mixing of primary carbonaceous with other aerosol species
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the mixing of hygroscopic and non-hygroscopic
species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e4223">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the MAM4 modal representation generally overestimated
the degree of mixing of BC with other aerosol species. This
overestimation is due to the fact that MAM4's choice of modes does not
allow for representing BC-free particles in the accumulation and
primary carbon modes. This is in contrast to field observations by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.61"/>, which showed that BC and POM may be externally
mixed near sources. The implication of this is that, if optical
properties are calculated based on the aerosol composition, absorption
will be overestimated.</p>
      <p id="d1e4240">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the error tended to be zonally
structured, where the MAM4 model overestimated the mixing state
indices at low latitudes and underestimated them at high
latitudes compared to the ML model.
This behavior could be explained by modeling choices in
MAM4, in particular that (1) BC is always emitted with POM, (2) no
BC-free particles<?pagebreak page17737?> exist in the submicron modes, and (3) dust is always
internally mixed with other aerosol species.</p>
      <p id="d1e4265">Mixing state is an important emergent property that
affects the aerosol radiative forcing and aerosol–cloud interactions,
but it is not easy to constrain this property globally.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluated
the spatial distribution of aerosol mixing state as predicted by a
global model. Since errors in mixing state predictions propagate into
errors in aerosol climate impacts, our findings provide a framework
and reference for Earth system model developers and users regarding simulation
reliability. For example, this framework can be used to (1) quantify
model bias in simulating mixing state in different regions, identifying
model structural deficiencies, and (2) provide insights into potential
improvements of model process representations for a more realistic
simulation of aerosols.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>Derivation of mode-based aerosol mixing state index</title>
      <p id="d1e4279">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.T3"/> details the notation for aerosol mass and
mass fractions to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using modal information.</p>
      <p id="d1e4295">To explain how to obtain Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) and
(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>) from Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) and
(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>), let us assume that each mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contains <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
particles and the number of species in the population is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The
mixing entropy of particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is given by
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>A1</label><mml:math id="M240" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The average particle mixing entropy of the entire population (summed
over all modes), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>A2</label><mml:math id="M242" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{7.99}{7.99}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munder></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e4684">Given that each mode is assumed to be internally mixed, particles
within the same mode have the same composition, and we have
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>A3</label><mml:math id="M243" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e4761">This results in
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>A4</label><mml:math id="M244" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e4864"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Therefore, based on Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.E16"/>) and the fact that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.E14"/>) can be rewritten as
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E17" content-type="numbered"><label>A5</label><mml:math id="M246" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        With the mode-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the other mixing state quantities can be computed as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S1.T3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d1e5018">Aerosol mass and mass fraction definition and notation. The
number of modes is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for MAM4 without the coarse mode), the
number of particles in mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the number of species
is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="5cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Quantity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Meaning</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mass of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">total mass of particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">total mass of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">total mass of mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">total mass of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in population</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">total mass of the population</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mass fraction of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (within mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mass fraction of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mass fraction of particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in population</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mass fraction of mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in population</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mass fraction of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in population</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e5720">Aerosol species mixing ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Accumulation
mode: a1; Aitken mode: a2; primary carbon mode: a4. The coarse
mode (a3) is not used in this study and therefore omitted in this figure. Black carbon: bc; dust: dst; sea salt: ncl; primary organic matter: pom;
secondary organic aerosol: soa; sulfate: so4.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17727/2021/acp-21-17727-2021-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d1e5753">Fraction of aerosol species mixing ratio (%). Accumulation mode: a1;  Aitken mode: a2; primary carbon mode: a4. The coarse mode (a3) is not used in this study and
therefore omitted in this figure. Black carbon: bc; dust: dst; sea salt: ncl;
primary organic matter: pom; secondary organic aerosol: soa; sulfate: so4.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17727/2021/acp-21-17727-2021-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5770">Notebooks and data to reproduce the global mixing state index analysis are available at <uri>https://github.com/zzheng93/code_ms_ml_mam4</uri> (last access: 16 November 2021)​​​​​​​ or <uri>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4731385</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.62"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5785">ZZ, MW, and NR conceptualized the analysis and
wrote the manuscript with input from the co-authors. ZZ developed
the code, carried out the simulations, and performed the
analysis. LZ, PLM, and XL provided scientific suggestions for the
manuscript. All authors were involved in helpful discussions and
contributed to the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5791">Some authors are members of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors have also no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e5800">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5806">We would like to acknowledge high-performance computing support from
Cheyenne (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6RX99HX</ext-link>) provided by NCAR's Computational
and Information Systems Laboratory, sponsored by the National Science
Foundation. The CESM project is supported primarily by the National
Science Foundation.  This research is part of the Blue Waters
sustained-petascale computing project, which is supported by the
National Science Foundation (awards OCI-0725070 and ACI-1238993), the
State of Illinois, and as of December 2019 the National
Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Blue Waters is a joint effort of the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and its National Center for
Supercomputing Applications. Po-Lun Ma and Xiaohong Liu
were supported by the Enabling Aerosol-cloud interactions at GLobal
convection-permitting scalES (EAGLES) project (74358), funded by the
U.S.  Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological
and Environmental Research, Earth System Model Development
program. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the
U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under
contract DE-AC05-76RL01830.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e5814">This research has been supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research (grant no. DE-SC0019192), the NSF Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences (grant no. AGS-1254428), the Office of Biological and Environmental Research (Enabling Aerosol-cloud interactions at GLobal convection-permitting scalES (EAGLES) project (grant no. 74358)), the Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (grant no. OCI-0725070), and the Division of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (grant no. ACI-1238993).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5821">This paper was edited by Qiang Zhang and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Asmi et~al.(2011)Asmi, Wiedensohler, Laj, Fjaeraa, Sellegri, Birmili,
Weingartner, Baltensperger, Zdimal, Zikova, Putaud, Marinoni, Tunved,
Hansson, Fiebig, Kivek{\"{a}}s, Lihavainen, Asmi, Ulevicius, Aalto, Swietlicki,
Kristensson, Mihalopoulos, Kalivitis, Kalapov, Kiss, {de Leeuw}, Henzing,
Harrison, Beddows, O\& amp;apos;Dowd, Jennings, Flentje, Weinhold, Meinhardt,
Ries, and Kulmala}}?><label>Asmi et al.(2011)Asmi, Wiedensohler, Laj, Fjaeraa, Sellegri, Birmili,
Weingartner, Baltensperger, Zdimal, Zikova, Putaud, Marinoni, Tunved,
Hansson, Fiebig, Kivekäs, Lihavainen, Asmi, Ulevicius, Aalto, Swietlicki,
Kristensson, Mihalopoulos, Kalivitis, Kalapov, Kiss, de Leeuw, Henzing,
Harrison, Beddows, O&amp;amp;apos;Dowd, Jennings, Flentje, Weinhold, Meinhardt,
Ries, and Kulmala</label><?label ASMIETAL11?><mixed-citation>Asmi, A., Wiedensohler, A., Laj, P., Fjaeraa, A.-M., Sellegri, K., Birmili, W., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Zdimal, V., Zikova, N., Putaud, J.-P., Marinoni, A., Tunved, P., Hansson, H.-C., Fiebig, M., Kivekäs, N., Lihavainen, H., Asmi, E., Ulevicius, V., Aalto, P. P., Swietlicki, E., Kristensson, A., Mihalopoulos, N., Kalivitis, N., Kalapov, I., Kiss, G., de Leeuw, G., Henzing, B., Harrison, R. M., Beddows, D., O'Dowd, C., Jennings, S. G., Flentje, H., Weinhold, K., Meinhardt, F., Ries, L., and Kulmala, M.: Number size distributions and seasonality of submicron particles in Europe 2008–2009, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5505–5538, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5505-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5505-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bauer et~al.(2008)Bauer, Wright, Koch, Lewis, McGraw, Chang,
Schwartz, and Ruedy}}?><label>Bauer et al.(2008)Bauer, Wright, Koch, Lewis, McGraw, Chang,
Schwartz, and Ruedy</label><?label BAUERETAL08?><mixed-citation>Bauer, S. E., Wright, D. L., Koch, D., Lewis, E. R., McGraw, R., Chang, L.-S., Schwartz, S. E., and Ruedy, R.: MATRIX (Multiconfiguration Aerosol TRacker of mIXing state): an aerosol microphysical module for global atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6003–6035, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6003-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-6003-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Binkowski and Shankar(1995)}}?><label>Binkowski and Shankar(1995)</label><?label BINKOWSKISHANKAR95?><mixed-citation>Binkowski, F. S. and Shankar, U.: The Regional Particulate Matter Model: 1.
Model Description and Preliminary Results, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100,
26191–26209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD02093</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bogenschutz et~al.(2018)Bogenschutz, Gettelman, Hannay, Larson,
Neale, Craig, and Chen}}?><label>Bogenschutz et al.(2018)Bogenschutz, Gettelman, Hannay, Larson,
Neale, Craig, and Chen</label><?label BOGENSCHUTZETAL18?><mixed-citation>Bogenschutz, P. A., Gettelman, A., Hannay, C., Larson, V. E., Neale, R. B., Craig, C., and Chen, C.-C.: The path to CAM6: coupled simulations with CAM5.4 and CAM5.5, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 235–255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-235-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-235-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bondy et~al.(2018)Bondy, Bonanno, Moffet, Wang, Laskin, and
Ault}}?><label>Bondy et al.(2018)Bondy, Bonanno, Moffet, Wang, Laskin, and
Ault</label><?label BONDYETAL18?><mixed-citation>Bondy, A. L., Bonanno, D., Moffet, R. C., Wang, B., Laskin, A., and Ault, A. P.: The diverse chemical mixing state of aerosol particles in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12595–12612, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Boucher et~al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens,
and Zhang}}?><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens,
and Zhang</label><?label ipcc13aerosol?><mixed-citation>Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.: Clouds and Aerosols, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M.,
Allen, S., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P., book
section 7, pp. 571–658, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United
Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Brown et~al.(2021)Brown, Liu, Pokhrel, Murphy, Lu, Saleh, Mielonen,
Kokkola, Bergman, Myhre, Skeie, {Watson-Paris}, Stier, Johnson, Bellouin,
Schulz, Vakkari, Beukes, {van Zyl}, Liu, and Chand}}?><label>Brown et al.(2021)Brown, Liu, Pokhrel, Murphy, Lu, Saleh, Mielonen,
Kokkola, Bergman, Myhre, Skeie, Watson-Paris, Stier, Johnson, Bellouin,
Schulz, Vakkari, Beukes, van Zyl, Liu, and Chand</label><?label BROWNETAL21?><mixed-citation>Brown, H., Liu, X., Pokhrel, R., Murphy, S., Lu, Z., Saleh, R., Mielonen, T.,
Kokkola, H., Bergman, T., Myhre, G., Skeie, R. B., Watson-Paris, D., Stier,
P., Johnson, B., Bellouin, N., Schulz, M., Vakkari, V., Beukes, J. P., van
Zyl, P. G., Liu, S., and Chand, D.: Biomass Burning Aerosols in Most Climate
Models Are Too Absorbing, Nat. Commun., 12, 277,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Chen and Guestrin(2016)}}?><label>Chen and Guestrin(2016)</label><?label CHENGUESTRIN16?><mixed-citation>Chen, T. and Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System,
in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD I<?pagebreak page17740?>nternational Conference on
Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM Press, San
Francisco, California, USA, pp. 785–794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1145/2939672.2939785</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ching et~al.(2012)Ching, Riemer, and West}}?><label>Ching et al.(2012)Ching, Riemer, and West</label><?label CHINGETAL12?><mixed-citation>Ching, J., Riemer, N., and West, M.: Impacts of black carbon mixing state on black carbon nucleation scavenging: Insights from a particle-resolved model,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D23209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018269" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018269</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ching et~al.(2017)Ching, Fast, West, and Riemer}}?><label>Ching et al.(2017)Ching, Fast, West, and Riemer</label><?label CHINGETAL17?><mixed-citation>Ching, J., Fast, J., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Metrics to quantify the importance of mixing state for CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7445–7458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ching et~al.(2018)Ching, West, and Riemer}}?><label>Ching et al.(2018)Ching, West, and Riemer</label><?label CHINGETAL18?><mixed-citation>Ching, J., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Quantifying Impacts of Aerosol
Mixing State on Nucleation-Scavenging of Black Carbon Aerosol
Particles, Atmosphere, 9, 17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9010017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos9010017</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ching et~al.(2019)Ching, Adachi, Zaizen, Igarashi, and
Kajino}}?><label>Ching et al.(2019)Ching, Adachi, Zaizen, Igarashi, and
Kajino</label><?label CHINGETAL19?><mixed-citation>Ching, J., Adachi, K., Zaizen, Y., Igarashi, Y., and Kajino, M.: Aerosol Mixing
State Revealed by Transmission Electron Microscopy Pertaining to Cloud
Formation and Human Airway Deposition, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 2, 22,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0081-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-019-0081-9</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cziczo et~al.(2009)Cziczo, Froyd, Gallavardin, Moehler, Benz,
Saathoff, and Murphy}}?><label>Cziczo et al.(2009)Cziczo, Froyd, Gallavardin, Moehler, Benz,
Saathoff, and Murphy</label><?label CZICZOETAL09?><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Gallavardin, S. J., Moehler, O., Benz, S.,
Saathoff, H., and Murphy, D. M.: Deactivation of Ice Nuclei Due to
Atmospherically Relevant Surface Coatings, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 044013,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044013</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Danabasoglu et~al.(2020)Danabasoglu, Lamarque, Bacmeister, Bailey,
DuVivier, Edwards, Emmons, Fasullo, Garcia, Gettelman, Hannay, Holland,
Large, Lauritzen, Lawrence, Lenaerts, Lindsay, Lipscomb, Mills, Neale,
Oleson, Otto-Bliesner, Phillips, Sacks, Tilmes, Kampenhout, Vertenstein,
Bertini, Dennis, Deser, Fischer, Fox-Kemper, Kay, Kinnison, Kushner, Larson,
Long, Mickelson, Moore, Nienhouse, Polvani, Rasch, and
Strand}}?><label>Danabasoglu et al.(2020)Danabasoglu, Lamarque, Bacmeister, Bailey,
DuVivier, Edwards, Emmons, Fasullo, Garcia, Gettelman, Hannay, Holland,
Large, Lauritzen, Lawrence, Lenaerts, Lindsay, Lipscomb, Mills, Neale,
Oleson, Otto-Bliesner, Phillips, Sacks, Tilmes, Kampenhout, Vertenstein,
Bertini, Dennis, Deser, Fischer, Fox-Kemper, Kay, Kinnison, Kushner, Larson,
Long, Mickelson, Moore, Nienhouse, Polvani, Rasch, and
Strand</label><?label DANABASOGLUETAL20?><mixed-citation>Danabasoglu, G., Lamarque, J.-F., Bacmeister, J., Bailey, D. A., DuVivier,
A. K., Edwards, J., Emmons, L. K., Fasullo, J., Garcia, R., Gettelman, A.,
Hannay, C., Holland, M. M., Large, W. G., Lauritzen, P. H., Lawrence, D. M.,
Lenaerts, J. T. M., Lindsay, K., Lipscomb, W. H., Mills, M. J., Neale, R.,
Oleson, K. W., Otto-Bliesner, B., Phillips, A. S., Sacks, W., Tilmes, S.,
Kampenhout, L., Vertenstein, M., Bertini, A., Dennis, J., Deser, C., Fischer,
C., Fox-Kemper, B., Kay, J. E., Kinnison, D., Kushner, P. J., Larson, V. E.,
Long, M. C., Mickelson, S., Moore, J. K., Nienhouse, E., Polvani, L., Rasch,
P. J., and Strand, W. G.: The Community Earth System Model Version 2
(CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12, e2019MS001916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001916" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001916</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dickau et~al.(2016)Dickau, Olfert, Stettler, Boies, Momenimovahed,
Thomson, Smallwood, and Johnson}}?><label>Dickau et al.(2016)Dickau, Olfert, Stettler, Boies, Momenimovahed,
Thomson, Smallwood, and Johnson</label><?label DICKAUETAL16?><mixed-citation>Dickau, M., Olfert, J., Stettler, M. E. J., Boies, A., Momenimovahed, A.,
Thomson, K., Smallwood, G., and Johnson, M.: Methodology for Quantifying the
Volatile Mixing State of an Aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 50, 759–772,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1185509" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2016.1185509</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Emmons et~al.(2020)Emmons, Schwantes, Orlando, Tyndall, Kinnison,
Lamarque, Marsh, Mills, Tilmes, Bardeen, Buchholz, Conley, Gettelman, Garcia,
Simpson, Blake, Meinardi, and P{\'{e}}tron}}?><label>Emmons et al.(2020)Emmons, Schwantes, Orlando, Tyndall, Kinnison,
Lamarque, Marsh, Mills, Tilmes, Bardeen, Buchholz, Conley, Gettelman, Garcia,
Simpson, Blake, Meinardi, and Pétron</label><?label EMMONSETAL20?><mixed-citation>Emmons, L. K., Schwantes, R. H., Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G., Kinnison, D.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Marsh, D., Mills, M. J., Tilmes, S., Bardeen, C., Buchholz,
R. R., Conley, A., Gettelman, A., Garcia, R., Simpson, I., Blake, D. R.,
Meinardi, S., and Pétron, G.: The Chemistry Mechanism in the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth
Syst., 12, e2019MS001882, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001882" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001882</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fierce et~al.(2016)Fierce, Bond, Bauer, Mena, and
Riemer}}?><label>Fierce et al.(2016)Fierce, Bond, Bauer, Mena, and
Riemer</label><?label FIERCEETAL16?><mixed-citation>Fierce, L., Bond, T. C., Bauer, S. E., Mena, F., and Riemer, N.: Black Carbon
Absorption at the Global Scale Is Affected by Particle-Scale Diversity in
Composition, Nat. Commun., 7, 12361, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12361" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms12361</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fierce et~al.(2017)Fierce, Riemer, and Bond}}?><label>Fierce et al.(2017)Fierce, Riemer, and Bond</label><?label FIERCEETAL17?><mixed-citation>Fierce, L., Riemer, N., and Bond, T. C.: Toward Reduced Representation of
Mixing State for Simulating Aerosol Effects on Climate, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 971–980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fraund et~al.(2017)Fraund, Pham, Bonanno, Harder, Wang, Brito, {de
S{\'{a}}}, Carbone, China, Artaxo, Martin, P{\"{o}}hlker, Andreae, Laskin,
Gilles, and Moffet}}?><label>Fraund et al.(2017)Fraund, Pham, Bonanno, Harder, Wang, Brito, de
Sá, Carbone, China, Artaxo, Martin, Pöhlker, Andreae, Laskin,
Gilles, and Moffet</label><?label FRAUNDETAL17?><mixed-citation>Fraund, M., Pham, D., Bonanno, D., Harder, T., Wang, B., Brito, J., de
Sá, S., Carbone, S., China, S., Artaxo, P., Martin, S., Pöhlker, C.,
Andreae, M., Laskin, A., Gilles, M., and Moffet, R.: Elemental Mixing
State of Aerosol Particles Collected in Central Amazonia during
GoAmazon2014/15, Atmosphere, 8, 173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8090173" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos8090173</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ghan et~al.(2012)Ghan, Liu, Easter, Zaveri, Rasch, Yoon, and
Eaton}}?><label>Ghan et al.(2012)Ghan, Liu, Easter, Zaveri, Rasch, Yoon, and
Eaton</label><?label GHANETAL12?><mixed-citation>Ghan, S. J., Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P. J., Yoon, J.-H., and
Eaton, B.: Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate
Models: Comparative Decomposition of Aerosol Direct,
Semidirect, and Indirect Radiative Forcing, J. Climate, 25,
6461–6476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00650.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00650.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Healy et~al.(2014)Healy, Riemer, Wenger, Murphy, West, Poulain,
Wiedensohler, O'Connor, McGillicuddy, Sodeau, and Evans}}?><label>Healy et al.(2014)Healy, Riemer, Wenger, Murphy, West, Poulain,
Wiedensohler, O'Connor, McGillicuddy, Sodeau, and Evans</label><?label HEALYETAL14?><mixed-citation>Healy, R. M., Riemer, N., Wenger, J. C., Murphy, M., West, M., Poulain, L., Wiedensohler, A., O'Connor, I. P., McGillicuddy, E., Sodeau, J. R., and Evans, G. J.: Single particle diversity and mixing state measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6289–6299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6289-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6289-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hughes et~al.(2018)Hughes, Kodros, Pierce, West, and
Riemer}}?><label>Hughes et al.(2018)Hughes, Kodros, Pierce, West, and
Riemer</label><?label HUGHESETAL18?><mixed-citation>Hughes, M., Kodros, J., Pierce, J., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Machine
Learning to Predict the Global Distribution of Aerosol Mixing
State Metrics, Atmosphere, 9, 15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9010015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos9010015</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kaiser et~al.(2014)Kaiser, Hendricks, Righi, Riemer, Zaveri, Metzger,
and Aquila}}?><label>Kaiser et al.(2014)Kaiser, Hendricks, Righi, Riemer, Zaveri, Metzger,
and Aquila</label><?label KAISERETAL14?><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J. C., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Riemer, N., Zaveri, R. A., Metzger, S., and Aquila, V.: The MESSy aerosol submodel MADE3 (v2.0b): description and a box model test, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1137–1157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1137-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-1137-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kulmala et~al.(2014)Kulmala, Pet{\"{a}}j{\"{a}}, Ehn, Thornton,
Sipil{\"{a}}, Worsnop, and Kerminen}}?><label>Kulmala et al.(2014)Kulmala, Petäjä, Ehn, Thornton,
Sipilä, Worsnop, and Kerminen</label><?label KULMALAETAL14?><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Ehn, M., Thornton, J., Sipilä, M.,
Worsnop, D., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Chemistry of Atmospheric Nucleation: On
the Recent Advances on Precursor Characterization and Atmospheric
Cluster Composition in Connection with Atmospheric New Particle
Formation, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 65, 21–37,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lee et~al.(2019)Lee, Rivellini, Chen, Liu, Price, Betha, Russell,
Zhang, and Cappa}}?><label>Lee et al.(2019)Lee, Rivellini, Chen, Liu, Price, Betha, Russell,
Zhang, and Cappa</label><?label LEEETAL19?><mixed-citation>Lee, A. K., Rivellini, L.-H., Chen, C.-L., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Betha, R.,
Russell, L. M., Zhang, X., and Cappa, C. D.: Influences of Primary
Emission and Secondary Coating Formation on the Particle Diversity
and Mixing State of Black Carbon Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
53, 9429–9438, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b03064</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et~al.(2012)Liu, Easter, Ghan, Zaveri, Rasch, Shi, Lamarque,
Gettelman, Morrison, Vitt, Conley, Park, Neale, Hannay, Ekman, Hess,
Mahowald, Collins, Iacono, Bretherton, Flanner, and Mitchell}}?><label>Liu et al.(2012)Liu, Easter, Ghan, Zaveri, Rasch, Shi, Lamarque,
Gettelman, Morrison, Vitt, Conley, Park, Neale, Hannay, Ekman, Hess,
Mahowald, Collins, Iacono, Bretherton, Flanner, and Mitchell</label><?label LIUETAL12?><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S., Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W., Iacono, M. J., Bretherton, C. S., Flanner, M. G., and Mitchell, D.: Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 709–739, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et~al.(2016)Liu, Ma, Wang, Tilmes, Singh, Easter, Ghan, and
Rasch}}?><label>Liu et al.(2016)Liu, Ma, Wang, Tilmes, Singh, Easter, Ghan, and
Rasch</label><?label LIUETAL16?><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Ma, P.-L., Wang, H., Tilmes, S., Singh, B., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., and Rasch, P. J.: Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 505–522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{O'Brien et~al.(2015)O'Brien, Wang, Laskin, Riemer, West, Zhang, Sun,
Yu, Alpert, Knopf, Gilles, and Moffet}}?><label>O'Brien et al.(2015)O'Brien, Wang, Laskin, Riemer, West, Zhang, Sun,
Yu, Alpert, Knopf, Gilles, and Moffet</label><?label OBRIENETAL15?><mixed-citation>O'Brien, R. E., Wang, B., Laskin, A., Riemer, N., West, M., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y.,
Yu, X.-Y., Alpert, P., Knopf, D. A., Gilles, M. K., and Moffet, R. C.:
Chemical Imaging of Ambient Aerosol Particles: Observational Constraints on
Mixing State Parameterization, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9591–9605,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023480" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023480</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page17741?><ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pierce et~al.(2015)Pierce, Croft, Kodros, D'Andrea, and
Martin}}?><label>Pierce et al.(2015)Pierce, Croft, Kodros, D'Andrea, and
Martin</label><?label PIERCEETAL15?><mixed-citation>Pierce, J. R., Croft, B., Kodros, J. K., D'Andrea, S. D., and Martin, R. V.: The importance of interstitial particle scavenging by cloud droplets in shaping the remote aerosol size distribution and global aerosol-climate effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6147–6158, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6147-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6147-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Raatikainen et~al.(2015)Raatikainen, Brus, Hyv{\"{a}}rinen, Svensson,
Asmi, and Lihavainen}}?><label>Raatikainen et al.(2015)Raatikainen, Brus, Hyvärinen, Svensson,
Asmi, and Lihavainen</label><?label RAATIKAINENETAL15?><mixed-citation>Raatikainen, T., Brus, D., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Svensson, J., Asmi, E., and Lihavainen, H.: Black carbon concentrations and mixing state in the Finnish Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10057–10070, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10057-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10057-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riemer and West(2013)}}?><label>Riemer and West(2013)</label><?label RIEMERWEST13?><mixed-citation>Riemer, N. and West, M.: Quantifying aerosol mixing state with entropy and diversity measures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11423–11439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11423-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-11423-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riemer et~al.(2003)Riemer, Vogel, Vogel, and Fiedler}}?><label>Riemer et al.(2003)Riemer, Vogel, Vogel, and Fiedler</label><?label RIEMERETAL03?><mixed-citation>Riemer, N., Vogel, H., Vogel, B., and Fiedler, F.: Modeling Aerosols on the
Mesoscale-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: Treatment of Soot Aerosol and Its Radiative Effects, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4601, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003448" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003448</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riemer et~al.(2009)Riemer, West, Zaveri, and Easter}}?><label>Riemer et al.(2009)Riemer, West, Zaveri, and Easter</label><?label RIEMERETAL09?><mixed-citation>Riemer, N., West, M., Zaveri, R. A., and Easter, R. C.: Simulating the
Evolution of Soot Mixing State with a Particle-resolved Aerosol Model, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D09202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011073</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riemer et~al.(2019)Riemer, Ault, West, Craig, and
Curtis}}?><label>Riemer et al.(2019)Riemer, Ault, West, Craig, and
Curtis</label><?label RIEMERETAL19?><mixed-citation>Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., and Curtis, J. H.: Aerosol
Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts, Rev. Geophys.,
57, 187–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018RG000615</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tian et~al.(2014)Tian, Riemer, West, Pfaffenberger, Schlager, and
Petzold}}?><label>Tian et al.(2014)Tian, Riemer, West, Pfaffenberger, Schlager, and
Petzold</label><?label TIANETAL14?><mixed-citation>Tian, J., Riemer, N., West, M., Pfaffenberger, L., Schlager, H., and Petzold, A.: Modeling the evolution of aerosol particles in a ship plume using PartMC-MOSAIC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5327–5347, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5327-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5327-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{United States Environmental Protection Agency(2017)}}?><label>United States Environmental Protection Agency(2017)</label><?label USEPA17?><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency:  CMAQ (Version 5.2), Zenodo [software], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1167892" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/ZENODO.1167892</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vogel et~al.(2009)Vogel, Vogel, B{\"{a}}umer, Bangert, Lundgren, Rinke,
and Stanelle}}?><label>Vogel et al.(2009)Vogel, Vogel, Bäumer, Bangert, Lundgren, Rinke,
and Stanelle</label><?label VOGELETAL09?><mixed-citation>Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Bäumer, D., Bangert, M., Lundgren, K., Rinke, R., and Stanelle, T.: The comprehensive model system COSMO-ART – Radiative impact of aerosol on the state of the atmosphere on the regional scale, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8661–8680, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8661-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8661-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang et~al.(2018)Wang, Ma, Peng, Zhang, Jiang, Easter, and
Yung}}?><label>Wang et al.(2018)Wang, Ma, Peng, Zhang, Jiang, Easter, and
Yung</label><?label WANGETAL18?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Ma, P.-L., Peng, J., Zhang, R., Jiang, J. H., Easter, R. C., and
Yung, Y. L.: Constraining Aging Processes of Black Carbon in the
Community Atmosphere Model Using Environmental Chamber Measurements, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 10, 2514–2526, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001387" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018MS001387</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang et~al.(2015)Wang, Liu, Zhang, Hu, Ji, Yu, and Wang}}?><label>Wang et al.(2015)Wang, Liu, Zhang, Hu, Ji, Yu, and Wang</label><?label WANGETAL15?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y. H., Liu, Z. R., Zhang, J. K., Hu, B., Ji, D. S., Yu, Y. C., and Wang, Y. S.: Aerosol physicochemical properties and implications for visibility during an intense haze episode during winter in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3205–3215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3205-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3205-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Willmott(1981)}}?><label>Willmott(1981)</label><?label WILLMOTT81?><mixed-citation>Willmott, C. J.: On the Validation of Models, Phys. Geogr., 2,
184–194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213</ext-link>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wilson et~al.(2001)Wilson, Cuvelier, and Raes}}?><label>Wilson et al.(2001)Wilson, Cuvelier, and Raes</label><?label WILSONETAL01?><mixed-citation>Wilson, J., Cuvelier, C., and Raes, F.: A Modeling Study of Global Mixed
Aerosol Fields, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 34081–34108,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000198" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000198</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yang et~al.(2009)Yang, Howell, Zhuang, and Huebert}}?><label>Yang et al.(2009)Yang, Howell, Zhuang, and Huebert</label><?label YANGETAL09?><mixed-citation>Yang, M., Howell, S. G., Zhuang, J., and Huebert, B. J.: Attribution of aerosol light absorption to black carbon, brown carbon, and dust in China – interpretations of atmospheric measurements during EAST-AIRE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2035–2050, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2035-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2035-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ye et~al.(2018)Ye, Gu, Li, Robinson, Lipsky, Kaltsonoudis, Lee, Apte,
Robinson, Sullivan, Presto, and Donahue}}?><label>Ye et al.(2018)Ye, Gu, Li, Robinson, Lipsky, Kaltsonoudis, Lee, Apte,
Robinson, Sullivan, Presto, and Donahue</label><?label YEETAL18?><mixed-citation>Ye, Q., Gu, P., Li, H. Z., Robinson, E. S., Lipsky, E., Kaltsonoudis, C., Lee,
A. K., Apte, J. S., Robinson, A. L., Sullivan, R. C., Presto, A. A., and
Donahue, N. M.: Spatial Variability of Sources and Mixing State
of Atmospheric Particles in a Metropolitan Area, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 52, 6807–6815, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b01011</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yu et~al.(2020)Yu, Liu, Broda, Joshi, Olfert, Sun, Fu, Coe, and
Allan}}?><label>Yu et al.(2020)Yu, Liu, Broda, Joshi, Olfert, Sun, Fu, Coe, and
Allan</label><?label YUETAL20?><mixed-citation>Yu, C., Liu, D., Broda, K., Joshi, R., Olfert, J., Sun, Y., Fu, P., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Characterising mass-resolved mixing state of black carbon in Beijing using a morphology-independent measurement method, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3645–3661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3645-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3645-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yu and Luo(2009)}}?><label>Yu and Luo(2009)</label><?label YULUO09?><mixed-citation>Yu, F. and Luo, G.: Simulation of particle size distribution with a global aerosol model: contribution of nucleation to aerosol and CCN number concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7691–7710, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zaveri et~al.(2008)Zaveri, Easter, Fast, and Peters}}?><label>Zaveri et al.(2008)Zaveri, Easter, Fast, and Peters</label><?label ZAVERIETAL08?><mixed-citation>Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D., and Peters, L. K.: Model for
Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC), J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D13204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008782</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhang et~al.(2017)Zhang, Su, Kecorius, Wang, Hu, Zhu, He,
Wiedensohler, Zhang, and Cheng}}?><label>Zhang et al.(2017)Zhang, Su, Kecorius, Wang, Hu, Zhu, He,
Wiedensohler, Zhang, and Cheng</label><?label ZHANGETAL17?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Su, H., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., Hu, M., Zhu, T., He, K., Wiedensohler, A., Zhang, Q., and Cheng, Y.: Mixing State of Refractory Black Carbon of the North China Plain Regional Aerosol Combining a Single Particle Soot Photometer and a Volatility Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-222" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2017-222</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhao et~al.(2021)Zhao, Tan, Zhu, Hu, and Zhao}}?><label>Zhao et al.(2021)Zhao, Tan, Zhu, Hu, and Zhao</label><?label ZHAOETAL21a?><mixed-citation>Zhao, G., Tan, T., Zhu, Y., Hu, M., and Zhao, C.: Method to Quantify the Black Carbon Aerosol Light Absorption Enhancement with Entropy and Diversity Measures, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-336" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2021-336</ext-link>, in review, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zheng(2021)}}?><label>Zheng(2021)</label><?label Zheng2021?><mixed-citation>Zheng, Z.: zzheng93/code_ms_ml_mam4: First release, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4731385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4731385</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zheng et~al.(2021)Zheng, Curtis, Yao, Gasparik, Anantharaj, Zhao,
West, and Riemer}}?><label>Zheng et al.(2021)Zheng, Curtis, Yao, Gasparik, Anantharaj, Zhao,
West, and Riemer</label><?label ZHENGETAL21?><mixed-citation>Zheng, Z., Curtis, J. H., Yao, Y., Gasparik, J. T., Anantharaj, V. G., Zhao,
L., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Estimating submicron aerosol mixing state at the global scale with machine learning and Earth system modeling,
Earth Space Sci., 8, e2020EA001500, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001500" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020EA001500</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Quantifying the structural uncertainty of the aerosol mixing state representation in a modal model</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Asmi et al.(2011)Asmi, Wiedensohler, Laj, Fjaeraa, Sellegri, Birmili,
Weingartner, Baltensperger, Zdimal, Zikova, Putaud, Marinoni, Tunved,
Hansson, Fiebig, Kivekäs, Lihavainen, Asmi, Ulevicius, Aalto, Swietlicki,
Kristensson, Mihalopoulos, Kalivitis, Kalapov, Kiss, de Leeuw, Henzing,
Harrison, Beddows, O&amp;amp;apos;Dowd, Jennings, Flentje, Weinhold, Meinhardt,
Ries, and Kulmala</label><mixed-citation>
Asmi, A., Wiedensohler, A., Laj, P., Fjaeraa, A.-M., Sellegri, K., Birmili, W., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Zdimal, V., Zikova, N., Putaud, J.-P., Marinoni, A., Tunved, P., Hansson, H.-C., Fiebig, M., Kivekäs, N., Lihavainen, H., Asmi, E., Ulevicius, V., Aalto, P. P., Swietlicki, E., Kristensson, A., Mihalopoulos, N., Kalivitis, N., Kalapov, I., Kiss, G., de Leeuw, G., Henzing, B., Harrison, R. M., Beddows, D., O'Dowd, C., Jennings, S. G., Flentje, H., Weinhold, K., Meinhardt, F., Ries, L., and Kulmala, M.: Number size distributions and seasonality of submicron particles in Europe 2008–2009, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5505–5538, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5505-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5505-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bauer et al.(2008)Bauer, Wright, Koch, Lewis, McGraw, Chang,
Schwartz, and Ruedy</label><mixed-citation>
Bauer, S. E., Wright, D. L., Koch, D., Lewis, E. R., McGraw, R., Chang, L.-S., Schwartz, S. E., and Ruedy, R.: MATRIX (Multiconfiguration Aerosol TRacker of mIXing state): an aerosol microphysical module for global atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6003–6035, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6003-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6003-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Binkowski and Shankar(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Binkowski, F. S. and Shankar, U.: The Regional Particulate Matter Model: 1.
Model Description and Preliminary Results, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100,
26191–26209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02093</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bogenschutz et al.(2018)Bogenschutz, Gettelman, Hannay, Larson,
Neale, Craig, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>
Bogenschutz, P. A., Gettelman, A., Hannay, C., Larson, V. E., Neale, R. B., Craig, C., and Chen, C.-C.: The path to CAM6: coupled simulations with CAM5.4 and CAM5.5, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 235–255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-235-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-235-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bondy et al.(2018)Bondy, Bonanno, Moffet, Wang, Laskin, and
Ault</label><mixed-citation>
Bondy, A. L., Bonanno, D., Moffet, R. C., Wang, B., Laskin, A., and Ault, A. P.: The diverse chemical mixing state of aerosol particles in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12595–12612, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens,
and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.: Clouds and Aerosols, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M.,
Allen, S., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P., book
section 7, pp. 571–658, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United
Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Brown et al.(2021)Brown, Liu, Pokhrel, Murphy, Lu, Saleh, Mielonen,
Kokkola, Bergman, Myhre, Skeie, Watson-Paris, Stier, Johnson, Bellouin,
Schulz, Vakkari, Beukes, van Zyl, Liu, and Chand</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, H., Liu, X., Pokhrel, R., Murphy, S., Lu, Z., Saleh, R., Mielonen, T.,
Kokkola, H., Bergman, T., Myhre, G., Skeie, R. B., Watson-Paris, D., Stier,
P., Johnson, B., Bellouin, N., Schulz, M., Vakkari, V., Beukes, J. P., van
Zyl, P. G., Liu, S., and Chand, D.: Biomass Burning Aerosols in Most Climate
Models Are Too Absorbing, Nat. Commun., 12, 277,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Chen and Guestrin(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, T. and Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System,
in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on
Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM Press, San
Francisco, California, USA, pp. 785–794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Ching et al.(2012)Ching, Riemer, and West</label><mixed-citation>
Ching, J., Riemer, N., and West, M.: Impacts of black carbon mixing state on black carbon nucleation scavenging: Insights from a particle-resolved model,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D23209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018269" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018269</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Ching et al.(2017)Ching, Fast, West, and Riemer</label><mixed-citation>
Ching, J., Fast, J., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Metrics to quantify the importance of mixing state for CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7445–7458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Ching et al.(2018)Ching, West, and Riemer</label><mixed-citation>
Ching, J., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Quantifying Impacts of Aerosol
Mixing State on Nucleation-Scavenging of Black Carbon Aerosol
Particles, Atmosphere, 9, 17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9010017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9010017</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Ching et al.(2019)Ching, Adachi, Zaizen, Igarashi, and
Kajino</label><mixed-citation>
Ching, J., Adachi, K., Zaizen, Y., Igarashi, Y., and Kajino, M.: Aerosol Mixing
State Revealed by Transmission Electron Microscopy Pertaining to Cloud
Formation and Human Airway Deposition, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 2, 22,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0081-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0081-9</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Cziczo et al.(2009)Cziczo, Froyd, Gallavardin, Moehler, Benz,
Saathoff, and Murphy</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Gallavardin, S. J., Moehler, O., Benz, S.,
Saathoff, H., and Murphy, D. M.: Deactivation of Ice Nuclei Due to
Atmospherically Relevant Surface Coatings, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 044013,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044013</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Danabasoglu et al.(2020)Danabasoglu, Lamarque, Bacmeister, Bailey,
DuVivier, Edwards, Emmons, Fasullo, Garcia, Gettelman, Hannay, Holland,
Large, Lauritzen, Lawrence, Lenaerts, Lindsay, Lipscomb, Mills, Neale,
Oleson, Otto-Bliesner, Phillips, Sacks, Tilmes, Kampenhout, Vertenstein,
Bertini, Dennis, Deser, Fischer, Fox-Kemper, Kay, Kinnison, Kushner, Larson,
Long, Mickelson, Moore, Nienhouse, Polvani, Rasch, and
Strand</label><mixed-citation>
Danabasoglu, G., Lamarque, J.-F., Bacmeister, J., Bailey, D. A., DuVivier,
A. K., Edwards, J., Emmons, L. K., Fasullo, J., Garcia, R., Gettelman, A.,
Hannay, C., Holland, M. M., Large, W. G., Lauritzen, P. H., Lawrence, D. M.,
Lenaerts, J. T. M., Lindsay, K., Lipscomb, W. H., Mills, M. J., Neale, R.,
Oleson, K. W., Otto-Bliesner, B., Phillips, A. S., Sacks, W., Tilmes, S.,
Kampenhout, L., Vertenstein, M., Bertini, A., Dennis, J., Deser, C., Fischer,
C., Fox-Kemper, B., Kay, J. E., Kinnison, D., Kushner, P. J., Larson, V. E.,
Long, M. C., Mickelson, S., Moore, J. K., Nienhouse, E., Polvani, L., Rasch,
P. J., and Strand, W. G.: The Community Earth System Model Version 2
(CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12, e2019MS001916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001916" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001916</a>,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Dickau et al.(2016)Dickau, Olfert, Stettler, Boies, Momenimovahed,
Thomson, Smallwood, and Johnson</label><mixed-citation>
Dickau, M., Olfert, J., Stettler, M. E. J., Boies, A., Momenimovahed, A.,
Thomson, K., Smallwood, G., and Johnson, M.: Methodology for Quantifying the
Volatile Mixing State of an Aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 50, 759–772,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1185509" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1185509</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Emmons et al.(2020)Emmons, Schwantes, Orlando, Tyndall, Kinnison,
Lamarque, Marsh, Mills, Tilmes, Bardeen, Buchholz, Conley, Gettelman, Garcia,
Simpson, Blake, Meinardi, and Pétron</label><mixed-citation>
Emmons, L. K., Schwantes, R. H., Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G., Kinnison, D.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Marsh, D., Mills, M. J., Tilmes, S., Bardeen, C., Buchholz,
R. R., Conley, A., Gettelman, A., Garcia, R., Simpson, I., Blake, D. R.,
Meinardi, S., and Pétron, G.: The Chemistry Mechanism in the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth
Syst., 12, e2019MS001882, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001882" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001882</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Fierce et al.(2016)Fierce, Bond, Bauer, Mena, and
Riemer</label><mixed-citation>
Fierce, L., Bond, T. C., Bauer, S. E., Mena, F., and Riemer, N.: Black Carbon
Absorption at the Global Scale Is Affected by Particle-Scale Diversity in
Composition, Nat. Commun., 7, 12361, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12361" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12361</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Fierce et al.(2017)Fierce, Riemer, and Bond</label><mixed-citation>
Fierce, L., Riemer, N., and Bond, T. C.: Toward Reduced Representation of
Mixing State for Simulating Aerosol Effects on Climate, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 971–980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Fraund et al.(2017)Fraund, Pham, Bonanno, Harder, Wang, Brito, de
Sá, Carbone, China, Artaxo, Martin, Pöhlker, Andreae, Laskin,
Gilles, and Moffet</label><mixed-citation>
Fraund, M., Pham, D., Bonanno, D., Harder, T., Wang, B., Brito, J., de
Sá, S., Carbone, S., China, S., Artaxo, P., Martin, S., Pöhlker, C.,
Andreae, M., Laskin, A., Gilles, M., and Moffet, R.: Elemental Mixing
State of Aerosol Particles Collected in Central Amazonia during
GoAmazon2014/15, Atmosphere, 8, 173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8090173" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8090173</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Ghan et al.(2012)Ghan, Liu, Easter, Zaveri, Rasch, Yoon, and
Eaton</label><mixed-citation>
Ghan, S. J., Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P. J., Yoon, J.-H., and
Eaton, B.: Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate
Models: Comparative Decomposition of Aerosol Direct,
Semidirect, and Indirect Radiative Forcing, J. Climate, 25,
6461–6476, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00650.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00650.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Healy et al.(2014)Healy, Riemer, Wenger, Murphy, West, Poulain,
Wiedensohler, O'Connor, McGillicuddy, Sodeau, and Evans</label><mixed-citation>
Healy, R. M., Riemer, N., Wenger, J. C., Murphy, M., West, M., Poulain, L., Wiedensohler, A., O'Connor, I. P., McGillicuddy, E., Sodeau, J. R., and Evans, G. J.: Single particle diversity and mixing state measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6289–6299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6289-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6289-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Hughes et al.(2018)Hughes, Kodros, Pierce, West, and
Riemer</label><mixed-citation>
Hughes, M., Kodros, J., Pierce, J., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Machine
Learning to Predict the Global Distribution of Aerosol Mixing
State Metrics, Atmosphere, 9, 15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9010015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9010015</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Kaiser et al.(2014)Kaiser, Hendricks, Righi, Riemer, Zaveri, Metzger,
and Aquila</label><mixed-citation>
Kaiser, J. C., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Riemer, N., Zaveri, R. A., Metzger, S., and Aquila, V.: The MESSy aerosol submodel MADE3 (v2.0b): description and a box model test, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1137–1157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1137-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1137-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Kulmala et al.(2014)Kulmala, Petäjä, Ehn, Thornton,
Sipilä, Worsnop, and Kerminen</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Ehn, M., Thornton, J., Sipilä, M.,
Worsnop, D., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Chemistry of Atmospheric Nucleation: On
the Recent Advances on Precursor Characterization and Atmospheric
Cluster Composition in Connection with Atmospheric New Particle
Formation, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 65, 21–37,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Lee et al.(2019)Lee, Rivellini, Chen, Liu, Price, Betha, Russell,
Zhang, and Cappa</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, A. K., Rivellini, L.-H., Chen, C.-L., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Betha, R.,
Russell, L. M., Zhang, X., and Cappa, C. D.: Influences of Primary
Emission and Secondary Coating Formation on the Particle Diversity
and Mixing State of Black Carbon Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
53, 9429–9438, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03064</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Liu et al.(2012)Liu, Easter, Ghan, Zaveri, Rasch, Shi, Lamarque,
Gettelman, Morrison, Vitt, Conley, Park, Neale, Hannay, Ekman, Hess,
Mahowald, Collins, Iacono, Bretherton, Flanner, and Mitchell</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S., Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W., Iacono, M. J., Bretherton, C. S., Flanner, M. G., and Mitchell, D.: Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 709–739, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Liu et al.(2016)Liu, Ma, Wang, Tilmes, Singh, Easter, Ghan, and
Rasch</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Ma, P.-L., Wang, H., Tilmes, S., Singh, B., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., and Rasch, P. J.: Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 505–522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>O'Brien et al.(2015)O'Brien, Wang, Laskin, Riemer, West, Zhang, Sun,
Yu, Alpert, Knopf, Gilles, and Moffet</label><mixed-citation>
O'Brien, R. E., Wang, B., Laskin, A., Riemer, N., West, M., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y.,
Yu, X.-Y., Alpert, P., Knopf, D. A., Gilles, M. K., and Moffet, R. C.:
Chemical Imaging of Ambient Aerosol Particles: Observational Constraints on
Mixing State Parameterization, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9591–9605,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023480" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023480</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Pierce et al.(2015)Pierce, Croft, Kodros, D'Andrea, and
Martin</label><mixed-citation>
Pierce, J. R., Croft, B., Kodros, J. K., D'Andrea, S. D., and Martin, R. V.: The importance of interstitial particle scavenging by cloud droplets in shaping the remote aerosol size distribution and global aerosol-climate effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6147–6158, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6147-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6147-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Raatikainen et al.(2015)Raatikainen, Brus, Hyvärinen, Svensson,
Asmi, and Lihavainen</label><mixed-citation>
Raatikainen, T., Brus, D., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Svensson, J., Asmi, E., and Lihavainen, H.: Black carbon concentrations and mixing state in the Finnish Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10057–10070, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10057-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10057-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Riemer and West(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Riemer, N. and West, M.: Quantifying aerosol mixing state with entropy and diversity measures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11423–11439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11423-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11423-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Riemer et al.(2003)Riemer, Vogel, Vogel, and Fiedler</label><mixed-citation>
Riemer, N., Vogel, H., Vogel, B., and Fiedler, F.: Modeling Aerosols on the
Mesoscale-<i>γ</i>: Treatment of Soot Aerosol and Its Radiative Effects, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4601, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003448" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003448</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Riemer et al.(2009)Riemer, West, Zaveri, and Easter</label><mixed-citation>
Riemer, N., West, M., Zaveri, R. A., and Easter, R. C.: Simulating the
Evolution of Soot Mixing State with a Particle-resolved Aerosol Model, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D09202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011073</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Riemer et al.(2019)Riemer, Ault, West, Craig, and
Curtis</label><mixed-citation>
Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., and Curtis, J. H.: Aerosol
Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts, Rev. Geophys.,
57, 187–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Tian et al.(2014)Tian, Riemer, West, Pfaffenberger, Schlager, and
Petzold</label><mixed-citation>
Tian, J., Riemer, N., West, M., Pfaffenberger, L., Schlager, H., and Petzold, A.: Modeling the evolution of aerosol particles in a ship plume using PartMC-MOSAIC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5327–5347, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5327-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5327-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>United States Environmental Protection Agency(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
United States Environmental Protection Agency:  CMAQ (Version 5.2), Zenodo [software], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1167892" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1167892</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Vogel et al.(2009)Vogel, Vogel, Bäumer, Bangert, Lundgren, Rinke,
and Stanelle</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Bäumer, D., Bangert, M., Lundgren, K., Rinke, R., and Stanelle, T.: The comprehensive model system COSMO-ART – Radiative impact of aerosol on the state of the atmosphere on the regional scale, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8661–8680, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8661-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8661-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Wang et al.(2018)Wang, Ma, Peng, Zhang, Jiang, Easter, and
Yung</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Ma, P.-L., Peng, J., Zhang, R., Jiang, J. H., Easter, R. C., and
Yung, Y. L.: Constraining Aging Processes of Black Carbon in the
Community Atmosphere Model Using Environmental Chamber Measurements, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 10, 2514–2526, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001387" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001387</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Wang et al.(2015)Wang, Liu, Zhang, Hu, Ji, Yu, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y. H., Liu, Z. R., Zhang, J. K., Hu, B., Ji, D. S., Yu, Y. C., and Wang, Y. S.: Aerosol physicochemical properties and implications for visibility during an intense haze episode during winter in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3205–3215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3205-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3205-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Willmott(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Willmott, C. J.: On the Validation of Models, Phys. Geogr., 2,
184–194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213</a>, 1981.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Wilson et al.(2001)Wilson, Cuvelier, and Raes</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, J., Cuvelier, C., and Raes, F.: A Modeling Study of Global Mixed
Aerosol Fields, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 34081–34108,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000198" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000198</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Yang et al.(2009)Yang, Howell, Zhuang, and Huebert</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, M., Howell, S. G., Zhuang, J., and Huebert, B. J.: Attribution of aerosol light absorption to black carbon, brown carbon, and dust in China – interpretations of atmospheric measurements during EAST-AIRE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2035–2050, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2035-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2035-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Ye et al.(2018)Ye, Gu, Li, Robinson, Lipsky, Kaltsonoudis, Lee, Apte,
Robinson, Sullivan, Presto, and Donahue</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, Q., Gu, P., Li, H. Z., Robinson, E. S., Lipsky, E., Kaltsonoudis, C., Lee,
A. K., Apte, J. S., Robinson, A. L., Sullivan, R. C., Presto, A. A., and
Donahue, N. M.: Spatial Variability of Sources and Mixing State
of Atmospheric Particles in a Metropolitan Area, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 52, 6807–6815, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01011</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Yu et al.(2020)Yu, Liu, Broda, Joshi, Olfert, Sun, Fu, Coe, and
Allan</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, C., Liu, D., Broda, K., Joshi, R., Olfert, J., Sun, Y., Fu, P., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Characterising mass-resolved mixing state of black carbon in Beijing using a morphology-independent measurement method, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3645–3661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3645-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3645-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Yu and Luo(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, F. and Luo, G.: Simulation of particle size distribution with a global aerosol model: contribution of nucleation to aerosol and CCN number concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7691–7710, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Zaveri et al.(2008)Zaveri, Easter, Fast, and Peters</label><mixed-citation>
Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D., and Peters, L. K.: Model for
Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC), J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D13204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Zhang et al.(2017)Zhang, Su, Kecorius, Wang, Hu, Zhu, He,
Wiedensohler, Zhang, and Cheng</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Su, H., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., Hu, M., Zhu, T., He, K., Wiedensohler, A., Zhang, Q., and Cheng, Y.: Mixing State of Refractory Black Carbon of the North China Plain Regional Aerosol Combining a Single Particle Soot Photometer and a Volatility Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-222" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-222</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Zhao et al.(2021)Zhao, Tan, Zhu, Hu, and Zhao</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, G., Tan, T., Zhu, Y., Hu, M., and Zhao, C.: Method to Quantify the Black Carbon Aerosol Light Absorption Enhancement with Entropy and Diversity Measures, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-336" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-336</a>, in review, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Zheng(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, Z.: zzheng93/code_ms_ml_mam4: First release, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4731385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4731385</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Zheng et al.(2021)Zheng, Curtis, Yao, Gasparik, Anantharaj, Zhao,
West, and Riemer</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, Z., Curtis, J. H., Yao, Y., Gasparik, J. T., Anantharaj, V. G., Zhao,
L., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Estimating submicron aerosol mixing state at the global scale with machine learning and Earth system modeling,
Earth Space Sci., 8, e2020EA001500, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001500" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001500</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
