<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-17167-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Response of atmospheric composition to COVID-19 lockdown measures during
spring in the Paris region (France)</article-title><alt-title>Response of atmospheric composition to COVID-19 lockdown measures</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Response of atmospheric composition to COVID-19 lockdown measures}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.-E.~Petit et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Petit</surname><given-names>Jean-Eudes</given-names></name>
          <email>jean-eudes.petit@lsce.ipsl.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-5927</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Dupont</surname><given-names>Jean-Charles</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Favez</surname><given-names>Olivier</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gros</surname><given-names>Valérie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yunjiang</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-9685</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff5">
          <name><surname>Sciare</surname><given-names>Jean</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Simon</surname><given-names>Leila</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4650-9457</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Truong</surname><given-names>François</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bonnaire</surname><given-names>Nicolas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Amodeo</surname><given-names>Tanguy</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Vautard</surname><given-names>Robert</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Haeffelin</surname><given-names>Martial</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9889-1507</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA/Orme des
Merisiers, Gif-sur-Yvette, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Ecole Polytechnique, UVSQ,
Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques, Parc
Technologique ALATA, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS,
Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jean-Eudes Petit (jean-eudes.petit@lsce.ipsl.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>November</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>17167</fpage><lpage>17183</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e209">Since early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to
lockdowns at national scales. These lockdowns resulted in large cuts of
atmospheric pollutant emissions, notably related to the vehicular traffic
source, especially during spring 2020. As a result, air quality changed in
manners that are still currently under investigation. The robust
quantitative assessment of the impact of lockdown measures on ambient
concentrations is however hindered by weather variability. In order to
circumvent this difficulty, an innovative methodology has been developed.
The Analog Application for Air Quality (A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q) method is based on the
comparison of each day of lockdown to a group of analog days having similar
meteorological conditions. The A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q method has been successfully
evaluated and applied to a comprehensive in situ dataset of primary and
secondary pollutants obtained at the SIRTA observatory, a suburban
background site of the megacity of Paris (France). The overall slight decrease
of submicron particulate matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) compared to business-as-usual
conditions conceals contrasting behaviors. Primary traffic tracers
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and traffic-related carbonaceous aerosols) dropped by 42 %–66 %
during the lockdown period. Further, the A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q method enabled us to
characterize changes triggered by NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases. Particulate nitrate
and secondary organic aerosols (SOAs), two of the main springtime aerosol
components in northwestern Europe, decreased by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %,
respectively. A NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship emphasizes the interest of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mitigation policies at the regional (i.e., city) scale, although long-range
pollution advection sporadically overcompensated for regional decreases.
Variations of the oxidation state of SOA suggest discrepancies in SOA
formation processes. At the same time, the expected ozone increase
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) underlines the negative feedback of NO titration. These results
provide a quasi-comprehensive observation-based insight for mitigation
policies regarding air quality in future low-carbon urban areas.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page17168?><p id="d1e335">With the worldwide spread of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, the COVID-19
outbreak has been responsible for millions of premature deaths. In order to
slow down contagion rates, social interactions have progressively been
limited until the establishment of strict lockdowns at national scales
(Anderson et al., 2020) enforced during several weeks, especially during
spring 2020 in Europe. The corresponding stay-at-home orders resulted in a
sudden halt of economic activities and, as a consequence, in an
unprecedented drop of emission of pollution sources. From this perspective,
and despite tragic death records, these lockdowns are unique opportunities
to characterize an extreme end of mitigation policy scenarios and future
low-carbon megacities from direct observations. Scientific initiatives are
thriving across the globe in order to assess the impact of lockdowns on air
quality. They report, for the most part, a sharp decrease of the concentrations of nitrogen oxides
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), as well as an increase of tropospheric ozone (e.g.,
China: Le et al., 2020; India: Mahato et al., 2020; USA: Q. Liu et al., 2020; Europe: Sicard et al., 2020; Grange et al., 2021; South America:
Siciliano et al., 2020) as a response to stay-at-home orders.</p>
      <p id="d1e347">The increase of ozone is one counterintuitive example of the complex
chemistry occurring within the atmosphere, although its link with the
decrease of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations has been well established (e.g., Reis et
al., 2000). As highlighted by Kroll et al. (2020), beyond NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and particulate matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), additional information is needed in order to further
characterize the impacts of lockdown on the atmospheric chemical system.
Indeed, PM is composed of several different fractions, from organic to
inorganic and from primary to secondary pollutants, with diverse sources
and transformation processes. Any concentration change of PM may derive from
various compensatory feedbacks which are not characterized, limiting
therefore our understanding of the impacts of lockdown on air quality.
Moreover, springtime in northwestern Europe is usually associated with high
PM pollution episodes dominated by secondary material (mainly ammonium
nitrate and sulfate and secondary organic aerosols, SOAs), as shown in Bressi
et al. (2021). Ammonium nitrate is formed in the atmosphere from the
neutralization of nitric acid (formed through NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation) with
ammonia. The comprehensive characterization of SOA formation is also blurred
by the overwhelming numbers of transformation pathways, precursors and oxidant availability. Thus far, only few studies have investigated the
impacts of lockdown on PM chemistry and sources in Asia (e.g., Chang et al.,
2020; Sun et al., 2020; Tian et al., 2021; Manchanda et al., 2021) by
comparing the lockdown period with other periods (either a pre-lockdown
period or the same period of the year of previous years).</p>
      <p id="d1e395">On the other hand, the assessment of air quality implications of large cuts
in urban pollutant emissions is strongly hampered by meteorological
variability, which is one of the main drivers of air pollution temporality.
For instance, unfavorable meteorology has previously been associated with an
increase of PM concentrations in various urban areas worldwide (e.g., Dupont et
al., 2016; Wang et al., 2020). Sun et al. (2020) also highlighted severe
hazes during lockdown in China, linked to stagnant meteorological
conditions. Therefore, without climatologically representative values,
specific care must be taken when comparing concentrations observed
during and outside the lockdown period. The robustness of this assessment
depends on the way meteorology is handled and on what reference period
is chosen to compare with the lockdown period. A recent review by
Gkatzelis et al. (2021) pointed out that, despite the luxuriance of
scientific literature, more than half of examined articles did not take
meteorology into account. Advances in machine-learning (ML) approaches have
however enabled the contributions of meteorological
conditions to the temporal variations of primary and secondary PM components to be disentangled
(e.g., Stirnberg et al., 2021). ML has successfully been applied mainly on
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in various European urban areas (Petetin et al., 2020;
Grange et al., 2021). But weather-corrected studies of PM chemistry are
still scarce, especially in western Europe.</p>
      <p id="d1e416">The present study aims at reconciling a robust and innovative methodology
with a quasi-comprehensive in situ dataset, acquired within the Paris region
(France). The 12 million inhabitants of the region, representing around
20 % of the total French population, were placed under lockdown from 17 March 2020 to 10 May 2020, further designated as LP2020.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>In situ characterization of the atmospheric composition</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d1e434">In situ measurement datasets used in this study have been primarily obtained
at the SIRTA atmospheric observatory (2.15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 48.71<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N;
Haeffelin et al., 2005), a facility which contributes to the EU research
infrastructure ACTRIS (<uri>https://www.actris.eu</uri>, last access: 23 November 2021), following its quality
assurance and quality control guidelines. The chemical composition of major
submicron non-refractory species has been monitored since the end of 2011
using a quadrupole aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM; Ng et al.,
2011), constituting the longest ACSM dataset worldwide. Measurement
principles of the ACSM are extensively described elsewhere (Budisulistiorini
et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2019; Poulain et al., 2020). Here, 30 min
concentrations of submicron organic aerosols (OAs), nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>),
sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), ammonium (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and chloride (Cl) were corrected
with a time-dependent collection efficiency (Middlebrook et al., 2012) (CE).
The ACSM at SIRTA was regularly calibrated using 300 nm ammonium nitrate and
ammonium sulfate particles to derive ionization efficiencies (IEs) and
showed satisfactory performances during ACTRIS intercomparison exercises
(Crenn et al., 2015; Freney et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e486">The black carbon dataset consists in aethalometer measurements (Drinovec et
al., 2015). It is composed of subsequent and harmonized datasets obtained
from AE31 (January 2011–March 2013) and AE33 (March 2013–June 2020) devices and applying
a common validation procedure (Petit et al., 2017a). Briefly, for each
elementary measurement data point (5 and 1 min time base for AE31 and
AE33, respectively), BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were set as
invalid when below LoD (limit of detection; 100 ng/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); for
BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">950</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ng/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the spectral dependence was calculated
from the linear regression of ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Measurements were considered valid for a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (of this linear
regression) higher than 0.9 and aerosol Ångström exponent (AAE)
comprised between 0.8 and 3.</p>
      <?pagebreak page17169?><p id="d1e565">Daily concentrations of nitrogen monoxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) were retrieved from 1 min measurements performed with a T200UP
Teledyne instrument, equipped with a blue light photolytic converter and a
Nafion dryer. The instrument has been regularly calibrated with a reference
standard from National Physics Laboratory (Teddington, UK), and NO and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations have been corrected from ozone interference. The
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer has participated in the two ACTRIS intercomparison
exercises organized at Hohenpeissenberg in 2012 and 2016 and has shown a
good comparability with other instruments. Other NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations
throughout the Paris region between 2012 and 2020 were retrieved from the
regional air quality monitoring structure (Airparif, <uri>https://www.airparif.asso.fr</uri>, last access: 23 November 2021). In this respect, urban NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations refer here to the average of all urban background stations
measuring NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e626">As the ozone instrument from SIRTA experienced a major breakdown in 2020,
daily ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations were obtained between 2012 and 2020
from a peri-urban station in Les Ulis (2.165<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 48.68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), operated by Airparif. This station is located around 10 km away from
SIRTA, and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from Les Ulis has shown a good comparability with
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from SIRTA during the period of common measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e675">Meteorological variables at SIRTA (wind speed and direction, temperature,
relative humidity and pressure) were provided from the ReObs database
(Chiriaco et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Source apportionment of carbonaceous aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e686">Fossil fuel (BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and biomass burning (BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) fractions were
estimated from aethalometer measurements (Sandradewi et al., 2008). Since
the choice of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is critical, and given the size of our
dataset, their determination was based on the statistical hourly
distribution of the AAE (Fig. S1). The value of 1.85 was chosen for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to a maximum frequency during the night. This value
is close to the values used previously at SIRTA (Zhang et al., 2019) and
to the recommended value of 1.72 (Zotter et al., 2017). PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were estimated from BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations,
respectively, following the conversion factors of 2 and 10.3 found for SIRTA
during the same season (Petit et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e777">A source apportionment study of OA was carried out by positive matrix
factorization (PMF; Paatero and Tapper, 1994) from January to May 2020. The
analysis has been carried out seasonally (January–February and
March–April–May) in order to prevent influence from the seasonality of the profiles of
secondary factors (Canonaco et al., 2015). Profiles of hydrocarbon-like
organic aerosols (HOAs) and biomass burning organic aerosols (BBOAs) were
constrained with a random  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value approach (Canonaco et al., 2013), a third
factor being left unconstrained (oxygenated organic aerosol, OOA). The
criteria approach of SoFi Pro (Canonaco et al., 2021) was then used to
select satisfactory solutions over 100 runs, from the Pearson correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
of HOA vs. BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HOA vs. NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BBOA vs. BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Results obtained
here enrich the existing time series (Zhang et al., 2019) from June 2011 to
March 2018 (where MO-OOA and LO-OOA were summed as OOA). Both PMF outputs
were obtained with the same reference profiles of HOA and BBOA (Fröhlich
et al., 2015), and similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for HOA and BBOA were used (on average
0.26 and 0.32 for HOA and BBOA, respectively; 0.21 and 0.22 in Zhang et al.,
2019). As a result, HOA and BBOA profiles are very consistent, with the slope
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than 0.9.</p>
      <p id="d1e840">The oxidation properties (Kroll et al., 2011) of secondary organic aerosols
were characterized by removing the contribution of primary factors to the OA
matrix, as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M60" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mtext>HOA</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mtext>BBOA</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mtext>OA</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mtext>HOA</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mtext>BBOA</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          From there, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OSc</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were calculated from
the improved Aiken (Aiken et al., 2008) equations provided in Canagaratna et
al. (2015), using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 29, 43 and 44. Given the unit mass resolution of the
instrument, it is important to underline that these equations provide only
qualitative information for ACSM data. Absolute values, most probably
associated with significant uncertainties, will therefore not be discussed
here. Nevertheless, it is sufficient to characterize a change, since they
are uniformly applied throughout the dataset.</p>
      <p id="d1e976">The full time series between 2012 and 2020 is presented in Fig. S2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Back-trajectory calculation</title>
      <p id="d1e987">With the PC-based version of HYSPLIT (Stein et al., 2015) using 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) files, 120 h back-trajectories ending at SIRTA (49.15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 2.19<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) at 500 m a.g.l. were calculated every 6 h from 2012 to 2020. Calculations
using HYSPLIT executables were automatically controlled by ZeFir (Petit et
al., 2017b), a user-friendly interface based on Igor Pro 6.3
(Wavemetrics<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">©</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The cluster analysis presented in Sect. 3.1
was also applied from HYSPLIT executables, controlled by ZeFir. Five
clusters were used (Fig. S3a), in accordance with the total spatial variance
(TSV). The two oceanic clusters were summed as one.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methodology to estimate the impact of lockdown measures: an attempt to
compare apples to apples</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Choice of the comparison reference period</title>
      <?pagebreak page17170?><p id="d1e1059">The assessment of lockdown impact on air quality lies on the use of a
reference period, which is assumed to be representative of business-as-usual
conditions during LP2020, following
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M71" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>percentage change</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>LP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2020</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          In the current literature, different reference periods are used, from a
pre-lockdown period (pLP2020, Toscano and Murena, 2020; Dantas et al.,
2020; Otmani et al., 2020), to the weeks corresponding to LP of previous
years (e.g., 17 March to 11 May during 2017–2019 is LP2017–2019). Nevertheless,
in the case of SIRTA, applying these methodologies unquestioningly, without
verifying the inherent hypothesis that data are comparable, can lead to
significant variability and counterintuitive results. Figure 1 presents
concentration relative changes for the SIRTA dataset, using pLP2020, LP2019,
LP2017–2019, LP2015–2019 and LP2012–2019 as references. Significant
increases for all pollutants (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">439</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) are found with pLP2020, which seems to contradict the observed
drop of traffic. For the other reference periods, results reveal a
substantial decrease for the concentrations of pollutants related to traffic
emissions (i.e., BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HOA and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) but clear increases of all
other investigated pollutants, especially secondaries.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1151">Relative concentration change (%) of each species used in this
study following different reference periods, as well as from the A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q
approach presented in this article.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17167/2021/acp-21-17167-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1169">As reference periods, they assume meteorological conditions representative of
LP2020. However, April 2020 in France was exceptionally warmer
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), drier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of precipitation in the Paris region)
and sunnier (i.e., hours of sunshine during the day; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) than usual
(1981–2010 climatological reference values). Table S1 presents the
meteorological variability of the different reference periods (in terms of
ambient temperature, RH, pressure and wind speed) and shows that they do not
reproduce the meteorology of LP2020 (in terms of min, max and average,
especially <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH) and also fail at reproducing its temporality (low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values). Moreover, from a trajectory cluster analysis (Fig. S3a), it appears
that they misrepresent the variability of air mass origin. The unrealistic
features of pLP2020 can indeed be explained by a drastic change of western Europe meteorological conditions (from low-pressure to high-pressure system)
concomitantly with the application of lockdown policy measures in France
(Fig. 2). For the other reference periods, they still underrepresent the
continental sector (13 %–18 %) compared to LP2020 (28 %) and inversely
overrepresent oceanic air masses. Given the fact that, for instance,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OOA exhibit highest concentrations with continental
air masses, these methodologies at SIRTA most likely underestimate
business-as-usual concentrations and therefore lead to erroneous results.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1247">Frequency of trajectory clusters for each LP period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17167/2021/acp-21-17167-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1256">To overcome all these issues and account for the strong synergy between PM
chemical composition, emission sources and meteorology, we developed the
Analog Application for Air Quality (A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q) method, which is described
below.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The Analog Application for Air Quality (A${}^{{3}}$Q) approach}?><title>The Analog Application for Air Quality (A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q) approach</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Description</title>
      <p id="d1e1293">Analogs of atmospheric circulation (Yiou et al., 2013; Lorenz, 1969; Van Den
Dool, 1994; Zorita and Storch, 1999; Cattiaux et al., 2012) have been widely
used for different climatological purposes, notably for atmospheric
reconstructions and in the characterization of the role of synoptic
circulation in extreme meteorological events (Yiou et al., 2013; Vautard et
al., 2018). Circulation analogs are generally computed from daily pressure
spatial distributions. Here, we built the analogy based on three successive
layers:</p>
      <p id="d1e1296"><italic>Synoptic</italic>. Circulation analogs are computed similarly to previous studies. We used
daily sea-level pressure (SLP) data to better characterize near-surface
atmospheric circulation as our study covers near-surface pollutants. The SLP
data are extracted from NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data (Kalnay et al., 1996) along
the historical period that covers 2012 to 2019. The SLP fields considered
here have a horizontal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and cover a
spatial domain ranging <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E in longitude
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N in latitude. This region is
chosen because it includes atmospheric pressure patterns that influence
near-surface wind (Raynaud et al., 2017) in our area of study. For each
day of the study period, the 50 best circulation analogs (minimum spatial correlation of 0.5) are sought, using the spatial correlation as a way to measure
similarity between SLP fields. The calendar distance between the day in the
study period and days in the historic period is a maximum of 30 d. Out of 50
potential days with analog atmospheric circulation, only those with a
spatial correlation higher than 0.6 (representing 97.8 % of all analog
days, 23.2 analogs/day on average) were kept.</p>
      <p id="d1e1386"><italic>Regional</italic>. The air mass trajectory (AMT) of each synoptic analog was compared to the AMT
of the corresponding lockdown day. For each day, trajectory density (log of
the occurrence of trajectory endpoints) was calculated over a 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid covering western Europe. The distribution of spatial
correlation values between each day of LP and each analog day is presented
in Fig. S4. Since this distribution is rather spread out, a low threshold at
0.2 (representing 70 % of analog days, 16.3 analogs/day on average) was
selected in order to remove the worst analog AMT but also to keep
sufficient variability. An example of satisfactory and unsatisfactory
analogs is shown in Fig. S5.</p>
      <p id="d1e1416"><italic>Local</italic>. A specific constraint on local ambient temperature and relative humidity
(RH) was implemented. Indeed, both variables are key drivers of the
partitioning of semi-volatile material, such as ammonium nitrate. Therefore,
a satisfactory representation of local meteorological conditions by the
analogs is needed in order to robustly capture and characterize any change
of concentration. Over the study period, the analog performance regarding
temperature and RH respectively ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. Concretely, analogs that
are much colder and wetter (higher RH) than the observation day may be
associated with enhanced condensation of semi-volatile and/or hygroscopic
compounds, which would lead to an overestimation of the estimated decrease
of, e.g., nitrate. This specifically occurred on 21, 22
and 23 April 2020. To avoid that issue, we excluded the
analogs having the 5 % worst performance<?pagebreak page17171?> from the list. Acceptable ranges were therefore
between the 5th and 95th percentiles (excluded) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RH values, which were respectively ]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 6[ and ]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 35[. Despite
these relatively wide ranges, the A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q methodology allows us to efficiently
reconstruct meteorological conditions during the lockdown period. Indeed,
Fig. S11 presents, for the January–May 2020 period, the temporal variations
of observed and estimated temperature, RH and pressure. It shows low mean
bias values, as well as satisfactory correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of
0.78, 0.82 and 0.63, respectively), which indicates a satisfactory analogy.
Sensitivity tests presented below also demonstrate that stricter ranges do
not significantly change the analog results.</p>
      <p id="d1e1525"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Daily absolute concentration change (DAC) and median relative change (MRC)
for each species are defined as

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M112" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>DAC</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>Obs</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>Analog</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>MRC</mml:mtext><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">analog</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">analog</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>Obs</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>Analog</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the daily concentration at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, measured and calculated from A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q, respectively.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">analog</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the median concentration during
lockdown, measured and calculated from A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Data preparation</title>
      <p id="d1e1707">Daily averages have been computed for each variable. A valid average is
considered if at least 75 % of the day is covered.</p>
      <p id="d1e1710">Because the dataset consists in multi-year observations, long-term trends
may impact the estimated concentration change due to lockdown. To that end,
a seasonal Mann–Kendall (MK) test was performed on each variable for the
January 2012–February 2020 period. The Mann–Kendall R package was used (Bigi and Vogt,
2020; Collaud Coen et al., 2020), which includes three pre-whitening
approaches in order to reduce the weight of autocorrelation. Results are
summarized in Table 1. From this analysis, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OA, HOA, OOA, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (2012–2020, including lockdown) were linearly
corrected on a daily basis.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1743">Sen's slope (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/year)
and MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value for each variable of the study. No slope means that the
result does not reach the 95 % confidence interval. The slope is statistically
significant for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sen's slope</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value (95 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/year)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">confidence interval)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.156</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.009</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.037</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.068</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.019</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.049</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.068</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.459</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.067</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2124">In order to limit the unwanted weight of positive outliers which have poor
statistical representativity, the 1 % highest daily concentrations of
each variable were removed.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page17172?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Sensitivity tests</title>
      <p id="d1e2135">The results presented here primarily depend on the list of analog days that
are calculated. The overall analog number is at first determined by the
strictness of the correlation coefficients of atmospheric circulation and
air mass origin. Selection of best analogy leads to poor statistical
representativeness (Fig. S6), with a low number of analog days. It is
instead preferable to remove analog days associated with the worst trajectory
correlation (Fig. S4). It is noteworthy that little change in the
correlation coefficients (Table 2, Scenario 1–4) has little impact on the
results (for all variables) presented in this paper (Fig. S7). This can mainly be related to the reasonable change in the number of analog days.</p>
      <p id="d1e2138">Similarly, the impact of subsequent filtering with temperature and relative
humidity was also investigated. To this end, two additional scenarios were
considered (Scenario 5–6, Table 2). Scenario 5 and Scenario 6 have limited
impact on traffic-related variables (Fig. S7), as opposed to
wood-burning tracers and secondary compounds. This especially highlights the
essential role of meteorological representativeness in order to characterize
the changes of secondary pollution. Indeed, when no temperature and RH
filtering is performed (Scenario 5), the highest decrease of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is linked
to analog days that are associated with higher RH (Fig. S8a) and lower
temperature (Fig. S8b), which favor the partitioning of nitrate in the
particulate phase. Scenario 6 has a stricter filtering than the base one
and exhibits very good performance regarding the reconstruction of
meteorological conditions (Table 3). However, we show that both scenarios
have very similar daily NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration change despite slight
discrepancies in meteorological performance. This underlines that the
thresholds used in the base scenario are sufficient to provide robust
results.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2162">Acceptability thresholds used in different scenarios to
evaluate the sensitivity of our methodology.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Synoptic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Trajectory</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RH acceptability</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> acceptability</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Min. analog</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">analog <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">analog <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">no.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 35[</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 6[</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scenario 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 35[</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 6[</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scenario 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 35[</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 6[</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scenario 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 35[</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 6[</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scenario 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 35[</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 6[</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scenario 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scenario 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 17[</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 6[</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2528">Performance (expressed as mean bias) of different
scenarios to predict meteorological parameters during lockdown.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.87}[.87]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RH mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Wind speed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Pressure</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">bias (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mean bias</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">mean bias</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">bias (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(m/s)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(hPa)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scenario 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scenario 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>3.2.4</label><title>Performance evaluation</title>
      <p id="d1e2771">Furthermore, the performance of the analog methodology has been evaluated on
a business-as-usual period, from 1 January 2020 to 1 March 2020, similarly to the work of Petetin et al. (2020) and Grange et al. (2021) The construction of the analog list went through the same steps, with
the same thresholds. The acceptability range for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RH
moved to ]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 4[ and ]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 19[, respectively. This can primarily be related to the less extreme climatological conditions of January–February 2020. Mean bias
(MB), normalized mean bias (NMB), Pearson's correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
the fraction of data within a ratio of 2 (FAC2) have been used for the
evaluation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2818">Scatter plots and metric values are respectively presented in Fig. 3 and
Table 4. Results indicate satisfactory performance of all variables during
the evaluation period, although the range of observed concentrations remains
rather low.</p>
      <p id="d1e2821">The lower performance of BBOA in terms of co-variations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) may be
related to the absence of 2019 data, where fewer analog days could lead to
higher dispersion but also to the fickleness of the wood-burning source.
Still, as presented in the Results section, BBOA variations are consistent
with BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2848">Scatter plots of observed versus estimated concentrations
by A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q during the evaluation period of January–February 2020. Dots represent daily values during the evaluation period, and round
markers are averages over ranges of observed concentrations.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17167/2021/acp-21-17167-2021-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2869">Metric values (MB, NMB, FAC2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the evaluation of
A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q during January–February 2020.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NMB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">FAC2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.049</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.78</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.82</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OM (organic matter)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.69</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">36.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.71</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e3261">Figure 4 presents the distribution of absolute concentration change for each
species during lockdown. Results are further discussed in the following
subsections.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3266">Absolute changes of ambient concentrations of reactive gases and
particulate pollutants due to lockdown. Box plots represent the distribution
of daily absolute change (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); 10th, 25th,
50th, 75th and 90th percentiles were used. Values are
presented in Table 5.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17167/2021/acp-21-17167-2021-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3295">Distribution of absolute concentration change (10th,
25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentile were used), as
well as the median relative change (%). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values (95 % confidence
interval) of the pairing Student <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test between observations and analog
time series during lockdown.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col6" align="center">Absolute change (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Median relative change (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">p10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">p25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">p50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">p75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">p90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.14</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">61.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.003</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.71</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.0067</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.61</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.002</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Primary sources</title>
      <p id="d1e4191">Species usually considered as markers for primary traffic emissions
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HOA) exhibit a median decrease of
concentrations by 42 %–62 % (Table 5) at SIRTA. For NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, this is very
consistent with previous results in the Paris region using machine-learning
approaches (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, Grange et al., 2021). Moreover, the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease
at SIRTA, a peri-urban background station, also matches the relative
decrease calculated for urban and peri-urban stations across the region
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, respectively), although absolute changes are graduated
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for urban and peri-urban
stations, respectively). Although the intensity of the decrease differed
from site to site, the temporality of the change was uniform at the regional
scale, including SIRTA (Fig. 5). It is also consistent with traffic counting
data in the Paris region (<uri>https://dataviz.cerema.fr/trafic-routier/</uri>, last access: 23 November 2021), with a slow traffic increase
throughout the lockdown period.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4304">Temporal variation of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration changes at SIRTA and
urban and peri-urban background stations of the Paris region.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17167/2021/acp-21-17167-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page17174?><p id="d1e4322">On the other hand, wood-burning tracers (BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BBOA) exhibit an
increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % respectively, which can primarily be related to the stay-at-home order, enhancing emissions of residential
heating (Grange et al., 2021). Although absolute change is limited (Fig. 4),
by converting BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, increased
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations compensated for or even exceeded the decrease of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during specific days (Fig. 6). At the same time, the mean weekly
variation of wood burning changed during lockdown (Fig. S9), with increased
concentrations during the week, compared to the relatively flat variation in
business-as-usual conditions (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % on Fridays). Therefore,
lockdown changed both the intensity and temporality of the wood-burning source
in the Paris region.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e4422">Temporal variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
during lockdown. Brown shaded area shows compensation of wood burning.
Individual PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration changes are also displayed
with dotted lines. Black vertical lines delimit the start and the end of the
lockdown period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17167/2021/acp-21-17167-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{NO${}_{{x}}$-induced influence on secondary pollutants}?><title>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced influence on secondary pollutants</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>4.2.1</label><title>Ozone</title>
      <?pagebreak page17175?><p id="d1e4504">Nitrogen oxides play a central role within the atmospheric reactor, enabling
the formation of secondary pollutants (Kroll et al., 2020) such as
tropospheric ozone and secondary organic and inorganic aerosols (SOAs and
SIAs, respectively). Ozone is found to increase by 20 % (Fig. 4). This
negative feedback, due to the titration effect of NO, is already well
characterized (Reis et al., 2000), and the magnitude of the change inversely
follows the one of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> well (Fig. 7a). A sharp enough decrease of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shall tip over ozone formation to a NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited system
(Markakis et al., 2014), which may be seen from this relationship, where
ozone concentration change stabilizes at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at SIRTA. Nevertheless, it is worth
highlighting that the climatological extreme of spring 2020, with strong
positive temperature anomalies, should have also contributed to increased
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, as previously emphasized for Europe (Meleux et al.,
2007). Even though meteorology is taken into account by the A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q method,
the unique character of this springtime heatwave inherently blurs the
discrimination between ambient temperature and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> impacts on ozone
formation. This limitation would also occur for any other statistical
approaches, such as machine learning. Figure 7b shows indeed that some of
the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are associated with high temperatures
(daily average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), concomitantly with substantial
decrease of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. On the other hand, positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are also obtained for rather low temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and highest decreases of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which means that in this
case the increase of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is only NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-related.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4743"><bold>(a)</bold> Concentration change (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> versus
concentration change of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Colored dots
correspond to 100 resampling runs following the inverse normal distribution
law, whose mid-height width is the standard deviation of each analog day.
Markers represent the median, bottom and top and the shaded area the 25th
and 75th percentile, respectively. <bold>(b)</bold> Concentration change of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
versus ambient temperature. Marker's color and size are respectively
function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and observed O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17167/2021/acp-21-17167-2021-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>4.2.2</label><title>Particulate nitrate</title>
      <p id="d1e4852">Springtime in the Paris region is usually associated with PM pollution
episodes that are mainly triggered by particulate ammonium nitrate (Beekmann
et al., 2015) (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting from the reaction between
HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation) and ammonia (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). For that matter,
agricultural activities (the major source of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in western Europe; Fortems-Cheiney et al., 2016) were neither stopped nor restrained during
lockdown. Therefore, business-as-usual ammonia concentrations can reasonably
be assumed, and since the formation regime of nitrate in Paris has
previously been found to be NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited (Petetin et al., 2016), a
change of regime to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited is highly unlikely (Viatte et al.,
2021). Nitrate exhibits a median decrease of 45 %. The decrease linearly follows
the one of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8), although both compounds differ in terms of
reactivity and footprint. A similar relationship is shown when using urban
and peri-urban NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Fig. S10), which is consistent with
the temporal correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the Paris region
(Fig. 5). However, a slight shouldering of the decrease for urban NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
can be noticed, which implies that this efficiency regarding NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
related to the amplitude of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e4995">Same as Fig. 7a, for NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OOA and OSc<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Grey dots
correspond to days with predominant long-range transport, identified by a
positive NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OOA concentration change concomitantly with a SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration peak (Fig. 9), which have been excluded from percentile
calculations. Markers represent the median, bottom and top and the shaded area
the 25th and 75th percentile, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17167/2021/acp-21-17167-2021-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page17176?><p id="d1e5040">This result suggests the importance of rapid ammonium nitrate formation at a
rather local scale (Petit et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020) but shall not
eclipse continental advection that can occur in Paris, especially during
springtime (e.g., Beekmann et al., 2015). To that end, sulfate shows little
change (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) with no clear statistical significance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which indicates a similar influence of long-range pollution advection and
that SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources in eastern Europe (Pay et al., 2012) may not have
experienced a significant decrease. Consistent information on that matter
is unfortunately still rather scarce at the European scale. Filonchyk et
al. (2020) recently showed an increase of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in several Polish urban
areas, although their methodology does not take meteorology into account.
The Carbon Monitor initiative (Z. Liu et al., 2020) also records a decrease of
11.5 % of the power sector in Europe during 2020 compared to 2019. On
specific days, positive peaks of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are concomitant with higher
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Fig. 9). Since SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has been previously found
to be mainly advected in northern France (e.g., Favez et al., 2021), also
supported by the cluster analysis in Fig. S3b, this means that nitrate was,
in these cases, mainly advected from long-range transport, despite a decrease
of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is also concomitant with higher nitrogen oxidation ratio
(NOR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)) values and the highest positive change
(top panel of Fig. 9), suggesting a higher efficiency of HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
formation. Given the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship (Fig. 8a), and
hypothesizing that a decrease of locally formed NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is always
associated with a decrease of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at the measurement site,
long-range-transported NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be assumed to overcompensate for the
regional decrease (Eq. 4).
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M370" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">advected</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">local</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the daily concentration
change at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated from A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">local</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated from the relationship with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8).</p>
      <p id="d1e5350">For instance, on 28 March and 19 April, the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively of 11.7 and 6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> could be
apportioned into a regional decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
with an advected contribution of 17.2 and 10.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. This result would need to be further investigated and
confirmed by, e.g., chemistry transport model simulations, but it still
underlines the deleterious impact of long-range transport.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e5443">Temporal variation during LP2020 of <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OOA and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NOR values, color-coded by observed NOR.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17167/2021/acp-21-17167-2021-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>4.2.3</label><title>Secondary organic aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e5523">Secondary organic aerosols, proxied by OOA concentrations, exhibit a
decrease of 25 % compared to business-as-usual conditions. Given the
multitude of SOA precursors and formation pathways, this decrease can be
linked to numerous factors. Indeed, Srivastava et al. (2019) recently
highlighted the complexity of the SOA fractions in the Paris region<?pagebreak page17177?> during
springtime. The lack of specific organic tracers prevents us from thoroughly
apportioning SOA over the long-term analysis period of 2012–2020. As a
consequence, the apparent decrease of 25 % may derive from several
compensatory feedbacks, which cannot be individually characterized here.
Although SOA in Paris can not only be related to traffic (Crippa et al., 2013;
Srivastava et al., 2019), the decrease of OOA seems to be also correlated
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8b). NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> steps in SOA formation notably
when reacting with peroxy radicals (R-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), resulting from volatile organic compound (VOC) oxidation with the hydroxyl radical. The exceptional amount of sunshine
during lockdown may have positively influenced the availability of
OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the initialization of SOA formation. However, no direct
observations available at SIRTA can support this assumption directly. The
odd oxygen O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a conservative tracer of
photochemical chemistry (Sun et al., 2020), shows a slight increase
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). But unlike the findings of Herndon et al. (2008) in Mexico City
during spring, only a moderate correlation is found with OOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.068, following the recommendation of removing wood-burning- and
long-range-transport-related episodes). This may be linked to the rather low
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (60–110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the lockdown
period.</p>
      <p id="d1e5663">Despite very limited change on average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), daily OSc<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
is found to differ from business-as-usual conditions, adopting a comma-like
shape, as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8c). Indeed, although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OSc<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases until <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, it increases back for higher NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases, reaching a
median of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Despite being moderate, this behavior may reflect some
changes in SOA chemistry, notably regarding gas-phase oxidation of
anthropogenic precursors, as highlighted in Herndon et al. (2008). But at
this stage, the whole equation comprises too many unknown variables (from
VOC precursors to particulate end products) in order to fully describe the
impacts of lockdown measures on the numerous SOA formation
mechanisms; this remains arduously apprehensible.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Implications for air quality</title>
      <p id="d1e5787">The lockdown enforced during spring 2020 in Paris corresponds to a real-life
emission scenario, representing the extreme case of a quasi-total
interruption of the vehicular traffic source. Up to now, no mitigation
policy could have gone that far. From the results presented here, the impact
of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> control on submicron primary traffic-related aerosols (BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and HOA) remains limited, mainly because both do not contribute much to
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during spring (5.0 % and 5.7 % respectively).
However, it is worth mentioning that a higher impact can be expected within
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the vicinity of traffic, related to the decrease of non-exhaust
emissions (brake/tire wear and resuspension). This fraction has recently
been highlighted as particularly harmful for human health (Daellenbach et
al., 2020); therefore NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> control shall provide a significant
co-benefit for that specific matter.</p>
      <p id="d1e5835">Reducing the concentrations of secondary compounds is an arduous task
because mitigation policies can inherently only focus on the reduction of
primary pollutants. But regional NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction appears to have the
potential to be an efficient mitigation policy regarding secondary aerosols
(mainly NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SOA to a lesser extent), which account on average for
more than half of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during spring at SIRTA (respectively 28.9 % and
31.4 %). Moreover, although the traffic ban has been applied consistently
over the lockdown period, the decrease of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at SIRTA
ranges from 0 to around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Adding the impact of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
on BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HOA, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (considering neutralized aerosols) and
OOA together, the corresponding change of PM-related material ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 10). The efficiency of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mitigation
shall therefore be put in perspective with meteorological conditions (e.g.,
horizontal dispersion, since lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are associated with continental air masses), as well as the vertical atmospheric dynamic
(Dupont et al., 2016). It is also worth mentioning that in the case of
long-range pollution transport episodes,<?pagebreak page17178?> substantial efforts to reduce
emissions at the city scale will not be enough to counterbalance additional
advected material, as shown previously for NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OOA.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e6013">Impact of regional NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration change on PM-related species (BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
HOA, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OOA). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming aerosol neutralization (Petit
et al., 2015).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17167/2021/acp-21-17167-2021-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e6101">The COVID-19 pandemic led to life-changing restrictions, with strict
stay-at-home orders in western Europe during spring 2020. As a consequence,
light-duty vehicular traffic was almost completely stopped in urban areas,
such as the Paris region. Despite tragic death records, lockdowns represent
an open-air mitigation experiment, in a period that is usually associated
with PM pollution episodes dominated by secondary material. However, the
characterization of a change in chemical composition is not straightforward
because meteorology can strongly contribute to the temporal variability of
atmospheric pollutants. To that end, a unique methodology was built in order
to compare each day of lockdown with analog days having similar
meteorology. The analogy was based on three successive meteorological
layers, where synoptic, regional and local meteorology was considered. This
innovative approach was applied to a comprehensive in situ dataset, acquired
at the SIRTA observatory, a suburban station located 20 km southwest of
Paris. The A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q method provided satisfactory results over a
business-as-usual period, which ensures a robust characterization of
concentration changes in the Paris region during lockdown. Yet, A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q
requires a long-term dataset whose length is 9 years <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>; otherwise results can rapidly suffer from
shortfall of representativeness. Also the analogy needs to be carefully
inspected, notably in terms of local meteorology. Indeed, the first synoptic
layer appears to be not quite enough to capture all the specificity of the
sampling site.</p>
      <p id="d1e6129">The unprecedented drop of traffic commuting due to the stay-at-home order
led to an expected decrease of primary traffic pollutants NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), HOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), as well as an increase of
ozone concentrations due to the lesser contribution of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sink by
NO. Concomitantly, primary particles related to residential wood burning
show a slight increase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–20 %). The decrease of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)
triggered positive feedbacks regarding secondary aerosols, especially nitrate
and SOA, which are found to drop by 42 % and 25 % respectively. A
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship suggests the significance of rather local pollution
formation, contrasting with previous results in the region. The decrease of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was compensated for sporadically during long-range transport episodes.
The oxidation state of SOA is also seen to vary with NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
change, but our understanding of the phenomena involved still remains
limited, notably due to the lack of long-term VOC in situ observations in
the Paris region.</p>
      <p id="d1e6247">Finally, the proposed A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Q method may be considered an efficient tool
to monitor and quantify the impact of lockdowns in other
urban areas more precisely. It could also be useful for the quantitative evaluation of
emergency mitigation policies settled during pollution episodes.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6263">In situ measurements at SIRTA are available through the EBAS database
(<uri>https://ebas.nilu.no</uri>, last access: 23 November 2021). Ozone data from Airparif are available
at <uri>https://www.airparif-asso.fr</uri> (last access: 23 November 2021). GDAS files for back-trajectory calculation are available at <uri>https://www.arl.noaa.gov/hysplit/hysplit/</uri> (last access: 23 November 2021). The ZeFir procedure is available at <uri>https://sites.google.com/site/zefirproject/</uri> (last access: 23 November 2021).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e6278">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17167-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17167-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6287">JEP, OF, VG, YZ, JS, LS, FT, NB, TA and JCD
contributed to the availability of in situ measurements at SIRTA. YZ
performed the source apportionment analysis between 2012 and 2020. RV
provided the list of analog days from synoptic circulation. JCD and MH
demonstrated the feasibility of the analog method on SIRTA in situ data.
JEP performed the additional analyses, with contributions from LS.
JEP wrote the paper, with assistance from all authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6293">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e6299">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6305">This article is part of the special issue “Quantifying the impacts of stay-at-home policies on atmospheric composition and properties of aerosol and clouds over the European regions using ACTRIS related observations (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6311">The authors would like to thank Robin Aujay-Plouzeau, Roland Sarda-Estève, Dominique Baisnée and Vincent Crenn for their
contribution in maintaining data acquisition at SIRTA. Christophe Boitel and
Marc-Antoine Drouin are acknowledged for their support in data management.
This work also greatly benefited from discussions within the COLOSSAL COST
action CA16109.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6316">This research has been supported by the European Commission, Seventh Framework Programme (ACTRIS (grant no. 262254)), the European Commission, H2020 Research Infrastructures ACTRIS projects
(ACTRIS 2 (grant no. 654109)), the National Center for Scientific
Research (CNRS), the French alternatives energies and Atomic Energy
Commission (CEA), the French Ministry of Environment, and the DIM-R2DS
program from the Ile-de-France region. This work has also been supported by
CNRS-INSU for the measurements performed at the SI-SIRTA and those
within the long-term monitoring aerosol program SNO-CLAP, both of which are
components of the ACTRIS French Research Instructure and whose data are
hosted at the AERIS data center (<uri>https://www.aeris-data.fr/</uri>, last access: 23 November 2021).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6325">This paper was edited by Manvendra K. Dubey and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., and Sueper, D.:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols
with high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 4478–4485, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., and Hollingsworth, T. D.:
How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the
COVID-19 epidemic?, The Lancet, 395, 931–934,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beekmann, M., Prévôt, A. S. H., Drewnick, F., Sciare, J., Pandis, S. N., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Crippa, M., Freutel, F., Poulain, L., Ghersi, V., Rodriguez, E., Beirle, S., Zotter, P., von der Weiden-Reinmüller, S.-L., Bressi, M., Fountoukis, C., Petetin, H., Szidat, S., Schneider, J., Rosso, A., El Haddad, I., Megaritis, A., Zhang, Q. J., Michoud, V., Slowik, J. G., Moukhtar, S., Kolmonen, P., Stohl, A., Eckhardt, S., Borbon, A., Gros, V., Marchand, N., Jaffrezo, J. L., Schwarzenboeck, A., Colomb, A., Wiedensohler, A., Borrmann, S., Lawrence, M., Baklanov, A., and Baltensperger, U.: In situ, satellite measurement and model evidence on the dominant regional contribution to fine particulate matter levels in the Paris megacity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9577–9591, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9577-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-9577-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bigi, A. and Vogt, F. P. A.: mannkendall/R: First release (v1.0.0), Zenodo,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4134633" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4134633</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bressi, M., Cavalli, F., Putaud, J. P., Fröhlich, R., Petit, J.-E., Aas,
W., Äijälä, M., Alastuey, A., Allan, J. D., Aurela, M., Berico,
M., Bougiatioti, A., Bukowiecki, N., Canonaco, F., Crenn, V., Dusanter, S.,
Ehn, M., Elsasser, M., Flentje, H., Graf, P., Green, D. C., Heikkinen, L.,
Hermann, H., Holzinger, R., Hueglin, C., Keernik, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A.,
Kubelová, L., Lunder, C., Maasikmets, M., Makeš, O., Malaguti, A.,
Mihalopoulos, N., Nicolas, J. B., O'Dowd, C., Ovadnevaite, J., Petralia, E.,
Poulain, L., Priestman, M., Riffault, V., Ripoll, A., Schlag, P., Schwarz,
J., Sciare, J., Slowik, J., Sosedova, Y., Stavroulas, I., Teinemaa, E., Via,
M., Vodička, P., Williams, P. I., Wiedensohler, A., Young, D. E., Zhang,
S., Favez, O., Minguillón, M. C., and Prevot, A. S. H.: A European
aerosol phenomenology - 7: High-time resolution chemical characteristics of
submicron particulate matter across Europe, Atmos. Environ., 10, 100108,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100108</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Budisulistiorini, S. H., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E. S., Kollman, M. S., Ng, N. L., Verma, V., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Worsnop, D. R., Jayne, J. T., Weber, R. J., and Surratt, J. D.: Intercomparison of an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) with ambient fine aerosol measurements in downtown Atlanta, Georgia, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1929–1941, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1929-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-1929-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H., Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K. R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canonaco, F., Crippa, M., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment: ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3649–3661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canonaco, F., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Seasonal differences in oxygenated organic aerosol composition: implications for emissions sources and factor analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6993–7002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canonaco, F., Tobler, A., Chen, G., Sosedova, Y., Slowik, J. G., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R., El Haddad, I., Crippa, M., Huang, R.-J., Furger, M., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: A new method for long-term source apportionment with time-dependent factor profiles and uncertainty assessment using SoFi Pro: application to 1 year of organic aerosol data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 923–943, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-923-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-923-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cattiaux, J., Yiou, P., and Vautard, R.: Dynamics of future seasonal
temperature trends and extremes in Europe: a multi-model analysis from
CMIP3, Clim. Dynam., 38, 1949–1964,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1211-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-011-1211-1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page17180?><ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chang, Y., Huang, R., Ge, X., Huang, X., Hu, J., Duan, Y., Zou, Z., Liu, X.,
and Lehmann, M. F.: Puzzling Haze Events in China During the Coronavirus
(COVID-19) Shutdown, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088533,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088533" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL088533</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chiriaco, M., Dupont, J.-C., Bastin, S., Badosa, J., Lopez, J., Haeffelin, M., Chepfer, H., and Guzman, R.: ReOBS: a new approach to synthesize long-term multi-variable dataset and application to the SIRTA supersite, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 919–940, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-919-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-10-919-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Andrews, E., Bigi, A., Martucci, G., Romanens, G., Vogt, F. P. A., and Vuilleumier, L.: Effects of the prewhitening method, the time granularity, and the time segmentation on the Mann–Kendall trend detection and the associated Sen's slope, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6945–6964, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6945-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-6945-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crenn, V., Sciare, J., Croteau, P. L., Verlhac, S., Fröhlich, R., Belis, C. A., Aas, W., Äijälä, M., Alastuey, A., Artiñano, B., Baisnée, D., Bonnaire, N., Bressi, M., Canagaratna, M., Canonaco, F., Carbone, C., Cavalli, F., Coz, E., Cubison, M. J., Esser-Gietl, J. K., Green, D. C., Gros, V., Heikkinen, L., Herrmann, H., Lunder, C., Minguillón, M. C., Močnik, G., O'Dowd, C. D., Ovadnevaite, J., Petit, J.-E., Petralia, E., Poulain, L., Priestman, M., Riffault, V., Ripoll, A., Sarda-Estève, R., Slowik, J. G., Setyan, A., Wiedensohler, A., Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Jayne, J. T., and Favez, O.: ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison – Part 1: Reproducibility of concentration and fragment results from 13 individual Quadrupole Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitors (Q-ACSM) and consistency with co-located instruments, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 5063–5087, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5063-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-5063-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crippa, M., DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Mohr, C., Heringa, M. F., Chirico, R., Poulain, L., Freutel, F., Sciare, J., Cozic, J., Di Marco, C. F., Elsasser, M., Nicolas, J. B., Marchand, N., Abidi, E., Wiedensohler, A., Drewnick, F., Schneider, J., Borrmann, S., Nemitz, E., Zimmermann, R., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Baltensperger, U.: Wintertime aerosol chemical composition and source apportionment of the organic fraction in the metropolitan area of Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 961–981, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-961-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-961-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Daellenbach, K. R., Uzu, G., Jiang, J., Cassagnes, L.-E., Leni, Z., Vlachou, A., Stefenelli, G., Canonaco, F., Weber, S., Segers, A., Kuenen, J. J. P., Schaap, M., Favez, O., Albinet, A., Aksoyoglu, S., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., Geiser, M., El Haddad, I., Jaffrezo, J.-L., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Sources of particulate-matter air pollution and its oxidative potential in Europe, Nature, 587, 414–419, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2902-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-020-2902-8</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dantas, G., Siciliano, B., França, B. B., da Silva, C. M., and Arbilla,
G.: The impact of COVID-19 partial lockdown on the air quality of the city
of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Sci. Total Environ., 729, 139085,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139085" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139085</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dupont, J.-C., Haeffelin, M., Badosa, J., Elias, T., Favez, O., Petit, J.
E., Meleux, F., Sciare, J., Crenn, V., and Bonne, J. L.: Role of the
boundary layer dynamics effects on an extreme air pollution event in Paris,
Atmos. Env., 141, 571–579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.061</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Favez, O., Weber, S., Petit, J.-E., Alleman, L. Y., Albinet, A., Riffault,
V., Chazeau, B., Amodeo, T., Salameh, D., Zhang, Y., Srivastava, D.,
Samaké, A., Aujay-Plouzeau, R., Papin, A., Bonnaire, N., Boullanger, C.,
Chatain, M., Chevrier, F., Detournay, A., Dominik-Sègue, M., Falhun, R.,
Garbin, C., Ghersi, V., Grignion, G., Levigoureux, G., Pontet, S.,
Rangognio, J., Zhang, S., Besombes, J.-L., Conil, S., Uzu, G., Savarino, J.,
Marchand, N., Gros, V., Marchand, C., Jaffrezo, J.-L., and Leoz-Garziandia,
E.: Overview of the French Operational Network for In Situ Observation of PM
Chemical Composition and Sources in Urban Environments (CARA Program),
Atmosphere, 12, 207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020207" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos12020207</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Filonchyk, M., Hurynovich, V., and Yan, H.: Impact of Covid-19 lockdown on
air quality in the Poland, Eastern Europe, Environ. Res., 198, 110454,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110454" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envres.2020.110454</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fortems-Cheiney, A., Dufour, G., Hamaoui-Laguel, L., Foret, G., Siour, G.,
Van Damme, M., Meleux, F., Coheur, P.-F., Clerbaux, C., Clarisse, L., Favez,
O., Wallasch, M., and Beekmann, M.: Unaccounted variability in NH3
agricultural sources detected by IASI contributing to European spring haze
episode: Agricultural NH3 Detected by IASI, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43,
5475–5482, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069361" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069361</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Freney, E., Zhang, Y., Croteau, P., Amodeo, T., Williams, L., Truong, F.,
Petit, J.-E., Sciare, J., Sarda-Esteve, R., Bonnaire, N., Arumae, T.,
Aurela, M., Bougiatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., Coz, E., Artinano, B., Crenn,
V., Elste, T., Heikkinen, L., Poulain, L., Wiedensohler, A., Herrmann, H.,
Priestman, M., Alastuey, A., Stavroulas, I., Tobler, A., Vasilescu, J.,
Zanca, N., Canagaratna, M., Carbone, C., Flentje, H., Green, D., Maasikmets,
M., Marmureanu, L., Minguillon, M. C., Prevot, A. S. H., Gros, V., Jayne,
J., and Favez, O.: The second ACTRIS inter-comparison (2016) for Aerosol
Chemical Speciation Monitors (ACSM): Calibration protocols and instrument
performance evaluations, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 53, 830–842,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1608901" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2019.1608901</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fröhlich, R., Crenn, V., Setyan, A., Belis, C. A., Canonaco, F., Favez, O., Riffault, V., Slowik, J. G., Aas, W., Aijälä, M., Alastuey, A., Artiñano, B., Bonnaire, N., Bozzetti, C., Bressi, M., Carbone, C., Coz, E., Croteau, P. L., Cubison, M. J., Esser-Gietl, J. K., Green, D. C., Gros, V., Heikkinen, L., Herrmann, H., Jayne, J. T., Lunder, C. R., Minguillón, M. C., Močnik, G., O'Dowd, C. D., Ovadnevaite, J., Petralia, E., Poulain, L., Priestman, M., Ripoll, A., Sarda-Estève, R., Wiedensohler, A., Baltensperger, U., Sciare, J., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison – Part 2: Intercomparison of ME-2 organic source apportionment results from 15 individual, co-located aerosol mass spectrometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2555–2576, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2555-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-2555-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gkatzelis, G. I., Gilman, J. B., Brown, S. S., Eskes, H., Gomes, A. R.,
Lange, A. C., McDonald, B. C., Peischl, J., Petzold, A., Thompson, C. R.,
and Kiendler-Scharr, A.: The global impacts of COVID-19 lockdowns on urban
air pollution, Elementa-Sci. Anthrop., 9, 00176,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00176" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.2021.00176</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page17181?><ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grange, S. K., Lee, J. D., Drysdale, W. S., Lewis, A. C., Hueglin, C., Emmenegger, L., and Carslaw, D. C.: COVID-19 lockdowns highlight a risk of increasing ozone pollution in European urban areas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4169–4185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4169-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-4169-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Haeffelin, M., Barthès, L., Bock, O., Boitel, C., Bony, S., Bouniol, D., Chepfer, H., Chiriaco, M., Cuesta, J., Delanoë, J., Drobinski, P., Dufresne, J.-L., Flamant, C., Grall, M., Hodzic, A., Hourdin, F., Lapouge, F., Lemaître, Y., Mathieu, A., Morille, Y., Naud, C., Noël, V., O'Hirok, W., Pelon, J., Pietras, C., Protat, A., Romand, B., Scialom, G., and Vautard, R.: SIRTA, a ground-based atmospheric observatory for cloud and aerosol research, Ann. Geophys., 23, 253–275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-253-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-23-253-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Herndon, S. C., Onasch, T. B., Wood, E. C., Kroll, J. H., Canagaratna, M.
R., Jayne, J. T., Zavala, M. A., Knighton, W. B., Mazzoleni, C., Dubey, M.
K., Ulbrich, I. M., Jimenez, J. L., Seila, R., de Gouw, J. A., de Foy, B.,
Fast, J., Molina, L. T., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Correlation of
secondary organic aerosol with odd oxygen in Mexico City, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, L15804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL034058</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A.,
Reynolds, B., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K.
C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna,
M. R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S.,
Bluhm, H., Mysak, E. R., Smith, J. D., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of
atmospheric organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133–139,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nchem.948</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Heald, C. L., Cappa, C. D., Farmer, D. K., Fry, J. L., Murphy,
J. G., and Steiner, A. L.: The complex chemical effects of COVID-19
shutdowns on air quality, Nat. Chem., 12, 777–779,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-0535-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41557-020-0535-z</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Le, T., Wang, Y., Liu, L., Yang, J., Yung, Y. L., Li, G., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Unexpected air pollution with marked emission reductions during the
COVID-19 outbreak in China, Science, 369, 702–706,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb7431" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.abb7431</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, Q., Harris, J. T., Chiu, L. S., Sun, D., Houser, P. R., Yu, M., Duffy,
D. Q., Little, M. M., and Yang, C.: Spatiotemporal impacts of COVID-19 on
air pollution in California, USA, Sci. Total Environ., 750, 141592,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141592" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141592</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, Z., Ciais, P., Deng, Z., Davis, S. J., Zheng, B., Wang, Y., Cui, D.,
Zhu, B., Dou, X., Ke, P., Sun, T., Guo, R., Zhong, H., Boucher, O.,
Bréon, F.-M., Lu, C., Guo, R., Xue, J., Boucher, E., Tanaka, K., and
Chevallier, F.: Carbon Monitor, a near-real-time daily dataset of global CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission from fossil fuel and cement production, Sci. Data, 7, 392,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00708-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-020-00708-7</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lorenz, E. N.: The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of
motion, Tellus, 21, 289–307,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00444.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00444.x</ext-link>, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mahato, S., Pal, S., and Ghosh, K. G.: Effect of lockdown amid COVID-19
pandemic on air quality of the megacity Delhi, India, Sci. Total Environ.,
730, 139086, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139086" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139086</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Manchanda, C., Kumar, M., Singh, V., Faisal, M., Hazarika, N., Shukla, A.,
Lalchandani, V., Goel, V., Thamban, N., Ganguly, D., and Tripathi, S. N.:
Variation in chemical composition and sources of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the COVID-19
lockdown in Delhi, Environ. Int., 153, 106541,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2021.106541</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Markakis, K., Valari, M., Colette, A., Sanchez, O., Perrussel, O., Honore, C., Vautard, R., Klimont, Z., and Rao, S.: Air quality in the mid-21st century for the city of Paris under two climate scenarios; from the regional to local scale, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7323–7340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7323-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7323-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Meleux, F., Solmon, F., and Giorgi, F.: Increase in summer European ozone amounts due to climate change, Atmos. Environ., 41, 7577–7587, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.048</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46,
258–271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L.,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q., and Sun, Y. L.: An
aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) for routine monitoring of the
composition and mass concentrations of ambient aerosol, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 45, 780–794, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Otmani, A., Benchrif, A., Tahri, M., Bounakhla, M., Chakir, E. M., El Bouch,
M., and Krombi, M.: Impact of Covid-19 lockdown on PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in Salé City (Morocco), Sci. Total Environ., 735, 139541,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139541</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/env.3170050203</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pay, M. T., Jiménez-Guerrero, P., and Baldasano, J. M.: Assessing
sensitivity regimes of secondary inorganic aerosol formation in Europe with
the CALIOPE-EU modeling system, Atmos. Environ., 51, 146–164,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.027</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petetin, H., Sciare, J., Bressi, M., Gros, V., Rosso, A., Sanchez, O., Sarda-Estève, R., Petit, J.-E., and Beekmann, M.: Assessing the ammonium nitrate formation regime in the Paris megacity and its representation in the CHIMERE model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10419–10440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10419-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10419-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petetin, H., Bowdalo, D., Soret, A., Guevara, M., Jorba, O., Serradell, K., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Meteorology-normalized impact of the COVID-19 lockdown upon NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution in Spain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11119–11141, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11119-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11119-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petit, J.-E., Favez, O., Sciare, J., Canonaco, F., Croteau, P., Močnik, G., Jayne, J., Worsnop, D., and Leoz-Garziandia, E.: Submicron aerosol source apportionment of wintertime pollution in Paris, France by double positive matrix factorization (PMF2) usin<?pagebreak page17182?>g an aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) and a multi-wavelength Aethalometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13773–13787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13773-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-13773-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petit, J.-E., Favez, O., Sciare, J., Crenn, V., Sarda-Estève, R., Bonnaire, N., Močnik, G., Dupont, J.-C., Haeffelin, M., and Leoz-Garziandia, E.: Two years of near real-time chemical composition of submicron aerosols in the region of Paris using an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) and a multi-wavelength Aethalometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2985–3005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2985-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2985-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petit, J.-E., Amodeo, T., Meleux, F., Bessagnet, B., Menut, L., Grenier, D.,
Pellan, Y., Ockler, A., Rocq, B., Gros, V., Sciare, J., and Favez, O.:
Characterising an intense PM pollution episode in March 2015 in France from
multi-site approach and near real time data: Climatology, variabilities,
geographical origins and model evaluation, Atmos. Environ., 155, 68–84,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.012</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petit, J.-E., Favez, O., Albinet, A., and Canonaco, F.: A user-friendly tool
for comprehensive evaluation of the geographical origins of atmospheric
pollution: Wind and trajectory analyses, Environ. Model. Softw., 88,
183–187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.022</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Poulain, L., Spindler, G., Grüner, A., Tuch, T., Stieger, B., van Pinxteren, D., Petit, J.-E., Favez, O., Herrmann, H., and Wiedensohler, A.: Multi-year ACSM measurements at the central European research station Melpitz (Germany) – Part 1: Instrument robustness, quality assurance, and impact of upper size cutoff diameter, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4973–4994, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4973-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-4973-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Raynaud, D., Hingray, B., Zin, I., Anquetin, S., Debionne, S., and Vautard,
R.: Atmospheric analogues for physically consistent scenarios of surface
weather in Europe and Maghreb: Atmospheric analogues for physically
consistent surface weather, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 2160–2176,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4844" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.4844</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reis, S., Simpson, D., Friedrich, R., Jonson, J. E., Unger, S., and
Obermeier, A.: Road traffic emissions – predictions of future contributions
to regional ozone levels in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 34, 4701–4710,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00202-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00202-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sandradewi, J., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Perron, N., Alfarra,
M. R., Lanz, V. A., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Using Aerosol
Light Absorption Measurements for the Quantitative Determination of Wood
Burning and Traffic Emission Contributions to Particulate Matter, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 42, 3316–3323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es702253m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es702253m</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sicard, P., De Marco, A., Agathokleous, E., Feng, Z., Xu, X., Paoletti, E.,
Rodriguez, J. J. D., and Calatayud, V.: Amplified ozone pollution in cities
during the COVID-19 lockdown, Sci. Total Environ., 735, 139542,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139542" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139542</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Siciliano, B., Dantas, G., da Silva, C. M., and Arbilla, G.: Increased ozone
levels during the COVID-19 lockdown: Analysis for the city of Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil, Sci. Total Environ., 737, 139765,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139765" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139765</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Srivastava, D., Favez, O., Petit, J.-E., Zhang, Y., Sofowote, U. M., Hopke,
P. K., Bonnaire, N., Perraudin, E., Gros, V., Villenave, E., and Albinet,
A.: Speciation of organic fractions does matter for aerosol source
apportionment. Part 3: Combining off-line and on-line measurements, Sci.
Total Environ., 690, 944–955,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.378" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.378</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling
System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stirnberg, R., Cermak, J., Kotthaus, S., Haeffelin, M., Andersen, H., Fuchs, J., Kim, M., Petit, J.-E., and Favez, O.: Meteorology-driven variability of air pollution (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) revealed with explainable machine learning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3919–3948, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3919-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-3919-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Lei, L., Zhou, W., Chen, C., He, Y., Sun, J., Li, Z., Xu, W., Wang,
Q., Ji, D., Fu, P., Wang, Z., and Worsnop, D. R.: A chemical cocktail during
the COVID-19 outbreak in Beijing, China: Insights from six-year aerosol
particle composition measurements during the Chinese New Year holiday, Sci.
Total Environ., 742, 140739,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140739</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tian, J., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Yan, M., Liu, H., Zhang, N., Ran, W., and Cao, J.: Impacts of primary emissions and secondary aerosol formation on air pollution in an urban area of China during the COVID-19 lockdown, Environ. Int., 150, 106426, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106426" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2021.106426</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Toscano, D. and Murena, F.: The Effect on Air Quality of Lockdown Directives
to Prevent the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Campania Region – Italy:
Indications for a Sustainable Development, Sustainability, 12, 5558,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145558" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/su12145558</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Den Dool, H. M.: Searching for analogues, how long must we wait?, Tellus
A, 46, 314–324, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.1994.t01-2-00006.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0870.1994.t01-2-00006.x</ext-link>,
1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vautard, R., Colette, A., van Meijgaard, E., Meleux, F., Jan van Oldenborgh,
G., Otto, F., Tobin, I., and Yiou, P.: Attribution of Wintertime
Anticyclonic Stagnation Contributing to Air Pollution in Western Europe,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, S70–S75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0113.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0113.1</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Viatte, C., Petit, J.-E., Yamanouchi, S., Van Damme, M., Doucerain, C.,
Germain-Piaulenne, E., Gros, V., Favez, O., Clarisse, L., Coheur, P.-F.,
Strong, K., and Clerbaux, C.: Ammonia and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Air Pollution in Paris
during the 2020 COVID Lockdown, Atmos., 12, 160,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos12020160</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, P., Chen, K., Zhu, S., Wang, P., and Zhang, H.: Severe air pollution
events not avoided by reduced anthropogenic activities during COVID-19
outbreak, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 158, 104814,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104814" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104814</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yiou, P., Salameh, T., Drobinski, P., Menut, L., Vautard, R., and Vrac, M.:
Ensemble reconstruction of the atmospheric column from surface pressure
using analogues, Clim. Dynam., 41, 1333–1344,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1626-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-012-1626-3</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Favez, O., Petit, J.-E., Canonaco, F., Truong, F., Bonnaire, N., Crenn, V., Amodeo, T., Prévôt, A. S. H., Sciare, J., Gros, V., and Albinet, A.: Six-year source apportionment of submicron organic aerosols from near-continuous highly time-resolved measurements at SIRTA (Paris area, France), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 14755–14776, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14755-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-14755-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zorita, E. and Storch, H. V.: The Analog Method as a Simple Statistical
Downscaling Technique: Comparison with More Complicated Methods, J. Climate,
12, 2474–2489, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page17183?><ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zotter, P., Herich, H., Gysel, M., El-Haddad, I., Zhang, Y., Močnik, G., Hüglin, C., Baltensperger, U., Szidat, S., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Evaluation of the absorption Ångström exponents for traffic and wood burning in the Aethalometer-based source apportionment using radiocarbon measurements of ambient aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4229–4249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4229-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4229-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Response of atmospheric composition to COVID-19 lockdown measures during spring in the Paris region (France)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., and Sueper, D.:
O∕C and OM∕OC ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols
with high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 4478–4485, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., and Hollingsworth, T. D.:
How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the
COVID-19 epidemic?, The Lancet, 395, 931–934,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Beekmann, M., Prévôt, A. S. H., Drewnick, F., Sciare, J., Pandis, S. N., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Crippa, M., Freutel, F., Poulain, L., Ghersi, V., Rodriguez, E., Beirle, S., Zotter, P., von der Weiden-Reinmüller, S.-L., Bressi, M., Fountoukis, C., Petetin, H., Szidat, S., Schneider, J., Rosso, A., El Haddad, I., Megaritis, A., Zhang, Q. J., Michoud, V., Slowik, J. G., Moukhtar, S., Kolmonen, P., Stohl, A., Eckhardt, S., Borbon, A., Gros, V., Marchand, N., Jaffrezo, J. L., Schwarzenboeck, A., Colomb, A., Wiedensohler, A., Borrmann, S., Lawrence, M., Baklanov, A., and Baltensperger, U.: In situ, satellite measurement and model evidence on the dominant regional contribution to fine particulate matter levels in the Paris megacity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9577–9591, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9577-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9577-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bigi, A. and Vogt, F. P. A.: mannkendall/R: First release (v1.0.0), Zenodo,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4134633" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4134633</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bressi, M., Cavalli, F., Putaud, J. P., Fröhlich, R., Petit, J.-E., Aas,
W., Äijälä, M., Alastuey, A., Allan, J. D., Aurela, M., Berico,
M., Bougiatioti, A., Bukowiecki, N., Canonaco, F., Crenn, V., Dusanter, S.,
Ehn, M., Elsasser, M., Flentje, H., Graf, P., Green, D. C., Heikkinen, L.,
Hermann, H., Holzinger, R., Hueglin, C., Keernik, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A.,
Kubelová, L., Lunder, C., Maasikmets, M., Makeš, O., Malaguti, A.,
Mihalopoulos, N., Nicolas, J. B., O'Dowd, C., Ovadnevaite, J., Petralia, E.,
Poulain, L., Priestman, M., Riffault, V., Ripoll, A., Schlag, P., Schwarz,
J., Sciare, J., Slowik, J., Sosedova, Y., Stavroulas, I., Teinemaa, E., Via,
M., Vodička, P., Williams, P. I., Wiedensohler, A., Young, D. E., Zhang,
S., Favez, O., Minguillón, M. C., and Prevot, A. S. H.: A European
aerosol phenomenology - 7: High-time resolution chemical characteristics of
submicron particulate matter across Europe, Atmos. Environ., 10, 100108,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100108</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Budisulistiorini, S. H., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E. S., Kollman, M. S., Ng, N. L., Verma, V., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Worsnop, D. R., Jayne, J. T., Weber, R. J., and Surratt, J. D.: Intercomparison of an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) with ambient fine aerosol measurements in downtown Atlanta, Georgia, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1929–1941, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1929-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1929-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H., Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K. R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Canonaco, F., Crippa, M., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment: ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3649–3661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Canonaco, F., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Seasonal differences in oxygenated organic aerosol composition: implications for emissions sources and factor analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6993–7002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Canonaco, F., Tobler, A., Chen, G., Sosedova, Y., Slowik, J. G., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R., El Haddad, I., Crippa, M., Huang, R.-J., Furger, M., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: A new method for long-term source apportionment with time-dependent factor profiles and uncertainty assessment using SoFi Pro: application to 1 year of organic aerosol data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 923–943, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-923-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-923-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cattiaux, J., Yiou, P., and Vautard, R.: Dynamics of future seasonal
temperature trends and extremes in Europe: a multi-model analysis from
CMIP3, Clim. Dynam., 38, 1949–1964,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1211-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1211-1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, Y., Huang, R., Ge, X., Huang, X., Hu, J., Duan, Y., Zou, Z., Liu, X.,
and Lehmann, M. F.: Puzzling Haze Events in China During the Coronavirus
(COVID-19) Shutdown, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088533,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088533" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088533</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chiriaco, M., Dupont, J.-C., Bastin, S., Badosa, J., Lopez, J., Haeffelin, M., Chepfer, H., and Guzman, R.: ReOBS: a new approach to synthesize long-term multi-variable dataset and application to the SIRTA supersite, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 919–940, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-919-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-919-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Collaud Coen, M., Andrews, E., Bigi, A., Martucci, G., Romanens, G., Vogt, F. P. A., and Vuilleumier, L.: Effects of the prewhitening method, the time granularity, and the time segmentation on the Mann–Kendall trend detection and the associated Sen's slope, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6945–6964, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6945-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6945-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Crenn, V., Sciare, J., Croteau, P. L., Verlhac, S., Fröhlich, R., Belis, C. A., Aas, W., Äijälä, M., Alastuey, A., Artiñano, B., Baisnée, D., Bonnaire, N., Bressi, M., Canagaratna, M., Canonaco, F., Carbone, C., Cavalli, F., Coz, E., Cubison, M. J., Esser-Gietl, J. K., Green, D. C., Gros, V., Heikkinen, L., Herrmann, H., Lunder, C., Minguillón, M. C., Močnik, G., O'Dowd, C. D., Ovadnevaite, J., Petit, J.-E., Petralia, E., Poulain, L., Priestman, M., Riffault, V., Ripoll, A., Sarda-Estève, R., Slowik, J. G., Setyan, A., Wiedensohler, A., Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Jayne, J. T., and Favez, O.: ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison – Part 1: Reproducibility of concentration and fragment results from 13 individual Quadrupole Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitors (Q-ACSM) and consistency with co-located instruments, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 5063–5087, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5063-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5063-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Crippa, M., DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Mohr, C., Heringa, M. F., Chirico, R., Poulain, L., Freutel, F., Sciare, J., Cozic, J., Di Marco, C. F., Elsasser, M., Nicolas, J. B., Marchand, N., Abidi, E., Wiedensohler, A., Drewnick, F., Schneider, J., Borrmann, S., Nemitz, E., Zimmermann, R., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Baltensperger, U.: Wintertime aerosol chemical composition and source apportionment of the organic fraction in the metropolitan area of Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 961–981, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-961-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-961-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Daellenbach, K. R., Uzu, G., Jiang, J., Cassagnes, L.-E., Leni, Z., Vlachou, A., Stefenelli, G., Canonaco, F., Weber, S., Segers, A., Kuenen, J. J. P., Schaap, M., Favez, O., Albinet, A., Aksoyoglu, S., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., Geiser, M., El Haddad, I., Jaffrezo, J.-L., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Sources of particulate-matter air pollution and its oxidative potential in Europe, Nature, 587, 414–419, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2902-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2902-8</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Dantas, G., Siciliano, B., França, B. B., da Silva, C. M., and Arbilla,
G.: The impact of COVID-19 partial lockdown on the air quality of the city
of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Sci. Total Environ., 729, 139085,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139085" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139085</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Dupont, J.-C., Haeffelin, M., Badosa, J., Elias, T., Favez, O., Petit, J.
E., Meleux, F., Sciare, J., Crenn, V., and Bonne, J. L.: Role of the
boundary layer dynamics effects on an extreme air pollution event in Paris,
Atmos. Env., 141, 571–579, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.061</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Favez, O., Weber, S., Petit, J.-E., Alleman, L. Y., Albinet, A., Riffault,
V., Chazeau, B., Amodeo, T., Salameh, D., Zhang, Y., Srivastava, D.,
Samaké, A., Aujay-Plouzeau, R., Papin, A., Bonnaire, N., Boullanger, C.,
Chatain, M., Chevrier, F., Detournay, A., Dominik-Sègue, M., Falhun, R.,
Garbin, C., Ghersi, V., Grignion, G., Levigoureux, G., Pontet, S.,
Rangognio, J., Zhang, S., Besombes, J.-L., Conil, S., Uzu, G., Savarino, J.,
Marchand, N., Gros, V., Marchand, C., Jaffrezo, J.-L., and Leoz-Garziandia,
E.: Overview of the French Operational Network for In Situ Observation of PM
Chemical Composition and Sources in Urban Environments (CARA Program),
Atmosphere, 12, 207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020207" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020207</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Filonchyk, M., Hurynovich, V., and Yan, H.: Impact of Covid-19 lockdown on
air quality in the Poland, Eastern Europe, Environ. Res., 198, 110454,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110454" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110454</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fortems-Cheiney, A., Dufour, G., Hamaoui-Laguel, L., Foret, G., Siour, G.,
Van Damme, M., Meleux, F., Coheur, P.-F., Clerbaux, C., Clarisse, L., Favez,
O., Wallasch, M., and Beekmann, M.: Unaccounted variability in NH3
agricultural sources detected by IASI contributing to European spring haze
episode: Agricultural NH3 Detected by IASI, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43,
5475–5482, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069361" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069361</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Freney, E., Zhang, Y., Croteau, P., Amodeo, T., Williams, L., Truong, F.,
Petit, J.-E., Sciare, J., Sarda-Esteve, R., Bonnaire, N., Arumae, T.,
Aurela, M., Bougiatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., Coz, E., Artinano, B., Crenn,
V., Elste, T., Heikkinen, L., Poulain, L., Wiedensohler, A., Herrmann, H.,
Priestman, M., Alastuey, A., Stavroulas, I., Tobler, A., Vasilescu, J.,
Zanca, N., Canagaratna, M., Carbone, C., Flentje, H., Green, D., Maasikmets,
M., Marmureanu, L., Minguillon, M. C., Prevot, A. S. H., Gros, V., Jayne,
J., and Favez, O.: The second ACTRIS inter-comparison (2016) for Aerosol
Chemical Speciation Monitors (ACSM): Calibration protocols and instrument
performance evaluations, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 53, 830–842,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1608901" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1608901</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Fröhlich, R., Crenn, V., Setyan, A., Belis, C. A., Canonaco, F., Favez, O., Riffault, V., Slowik, J. G., Aas, W., Aijälä, M., Alastuey, A., Artiñano, B., Bonnaire, N., Bozzetti, C., Bressi, M., Carbone, C., Coz, E., Croteau, P. L., Cubison, M. J., Esser-Gietl, J. K., Green, D. C., Gros, V., Heikkinen, L., Herrmann, H., Jayne, J. T., Lunder, C. R., Minguillón, M. C., Močnik, G., O'Dowd, C. D., Ovadnevaite, J., Petralia, E., Poulain, L., Priestman, M., Ripoll, A., Sarda-Estève, R., Wiedensohler, A., Baltensperger, U., Sciare, J., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison – Part 2: Intercomparison of ME-2 organic source apportionment results from 15 individual, co-located aerosol mass spectrometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2555–2576, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2555-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2555-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Gkatzelis, G. I., Gilman, J. B., Brown, S. S., Eskes, H., Gomes, A. R.,
Lange, A. C., McDonald, B. C., Peischl, J., Petzold, A., Thompson, C. R.,
and Kiendler-Scharr, A.: The global impacts of COVID-19 lockdowns on urban
air pollution, Elementa-Sci. Anthrop., 9, 00176,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00176" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00176</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Grange, S. K., Lee, J. D., Drysdale, W. S., Lewis, A. C., Hueglin, C., Emmenegger, L., and Carslaw, D. C.: COVID-19 lockdowns highlight a risk of increasing ozone pollution in European urban areas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4169–4185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4169-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4169-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Haeffelin, M., Barthès, L., Bock, O., Boitel, C., Bony, S., Bouniol, D., Chepfer, H., Chiriaco, M., Cuesta, J., Delanoë, J., Drobinski, P., Dufresne, J.-L., Flamant, C., Grall, M., Hodzic, A., Hourdin, F., Lapouge, F., Lemaître, Y., Mathieu, A., Morille, Y., Naud, C., Noël, V., O'Hirok, W., Pelon, J., Pietras, C., Protat, A., Romand, B., Scialom, G., and Vautard, R.: SIRTA, a ground-based atmospheric observatory for cloud and aerosol research, Ann. Geophys., 23, 253–275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-253-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-253-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Herndon, S. C., Onasch, T. B., Wood, E. C., Kroll, J. H., Canagaratna, M.
R., Jayne, J. T., Zavala, M. A., Knighton, W. B., Mazzoleni, C., Dubey, M.
K., Ulbrich, I. M., Jimenez, J. L., Seila, R., de Gouw, J. A., de Foy, B.,
Fast, J., Molina, L. T., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Correlation of
secondary organic aerosol with odd oxygen in Mexico City, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, L15804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034058</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A.,
Reynolds, B., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K.
C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna,
M. R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S.,
Bluhm, H., Mysak, E. R., Smith, J. D., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of
atmospheric organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133–139,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.948" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.948</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Heald, C. L., Cappa, C. D., Farmer, D. K., Fry, J. L., Murphy,
J. G., and Steiner, A. L.: The complex chemical effects of COVID-19
shutdowns on air quality, Nat. Chem., 12, 777–779,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-0535-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-0535-z</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Le, T., Wang, Y., Liu, L., Yang, J., Yung, Y. L., Li, G., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Unexpected air pollution with marked emission reductions during the
COVID-19 outbreak in China, Science, 369, 702–706,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb7431" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb7431</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Q., Harris, J. T., Chiu, L. S., Sun, D., Houser, P. R., Yu, M., Duffy,
D. Q., Little, M. M., and Yang, C.: Spatiotemporal impacts of COVID-19 on
air pollution in California, USA, Sci. Total Environ., 750, 141592,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141592" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141592</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Z., Ciais, P., Deng, Z., Davis, S. J., Zheng, B., Wang, Y., Cui, D.,
Zhu, B., Dou, X., Ke, P., Sun, T., Guo, R., Zhong, H., Boucher, O.,
Bréon, F.-M., Lu, C., Guo, R., Xue, J., Boucher, E., Tanaka, K., and
Chevallier, F.: Carbon Monitor, a near-real-time daily dataset of global CO<sub>2</sub>
emission from fossil fuel and cement production, Sci. Data, 7, 392,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00708-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00708-7</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E. N.: The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of
motion, Tellus, 21, 289–307,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00444.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00444.x</a>, 1969.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Mahato, S., Pal, S., and Ghosh, K. G.: Effect of lockdown amid COVID-19
pandemic on air quality of the megacity Delhi, India, Sci. Total Environ.,
730, 139086, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139086" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139086</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Manchanda, C., Kumar, M., Singh, V., Faisal, M., Hazarika, N., Shukla, A.,
Lalchandani, V., Goel, V., Thamban, N., Ganguly, D., and Tripathi, S. N.:
Variation in chemical composition and sources of PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the COVID-19
lockdown in Delhi, Environ. Int., 153, 106541,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106541</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Markakis, K., Valari, M., Colette, A., Sanchez, O., Perrussel, O., Honore, C., Vautard, R., Klimont, Z., and Rao, S.: Air quality in the mid-21st century for the city of Paris under two climate scenarios; from the regional to local scale, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7323–7340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7323-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7323-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Meleux, F., Solmon, F., and Giorgi, F.: Increase in summer European ozone amounts due to climate change, Atmos. Environ., 41, 7577–7587, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.048</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46,
258–271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L.,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q., and Sun, Y. L.: An
aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) for routine monitoring of the
composition and mass concentrations of ambient aerosol, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 45, 780–794, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Otmani, A., Benchrif, A., Tahri, M., Bounakhla, M., Chakir, E. M., El Bouch,
M., and Krombi, M.: Impact of Covid-19 lockdown on PM<sub>10</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub>
concentrations in Salé City (Morocco), Sci. Total Environ., 735, 139541,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139541</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Pay, M. T., Jiménez-Guerrero, P., and Baldasano, J. M.: Assessing
sensitivity regimes of secondary inorganic aerosol formation in Europe with
the CALIOPE-EU modeling system, Atmos. Environ., 51, 146–164,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.027</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Petetin, H., Sciare, J., Bressi, M., Gros, V., Rosso, A., Sanchez, O., Sarda-Estève, R., Petit, J.-E., and Beekmann, M.: Assessing the ammonium nitrate formation regime in the Paris megacity and its representation in the CHIMERE model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10419–10440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10419-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10419-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Petetin, H., Bowdalo, D., Soret, A., Guevara, M., Jorba, O., Serradell, K., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Meteorology-normalized impact of the COVID-19 lockdown upon NO<sub>2</sub> pollution in Spain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11119–11141, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11119-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11119-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Petit, J.-E., Favez, O., Sciare, J., Canonaco, F., Croteau, P., Močnik, G., Jayne, J., Worsnop, D., and Leoz-Garziandia, E.: Submicron aerosol source apportionment of wintertime pollution in Paris, France by double positive matrix factorization (PMF2) using an aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) and a multi-wavelength Aethalometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13773–13787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13773-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13773-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Petit, J.-E., Favez, O., Sciare, J., Crenn, V., Sarda-Estève, R., Bonnaire, N., Močnik, G., Dupont, J.-C., Haeffelin, M., and Leoz-Garziandia, E.: Two years of near real-time chemical composition of submicron aerosols in the region of Paris using an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) and a multi-wavelength Aethalometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2985–3005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2985-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2985-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Petit, J.-E., Amodeo, T., Meleux, F., Bessagnet, B., Menut, L., Grenier, D.,
Pellan, Y., Ockler, A., Rocq, B., Gros, V., Sciare, J., and Favez, O.:
Characterising an intense PM pollution episode in March 2015 in France from
multi-site approach and near real time data: Climatology, variabilities,
geographical origins and model evaluation, Atmos. Environ., 155, 68–84,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.012</a>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Petit, J.-E., Favez, O., Albinet, A., and Canonaco, F.: A user-friendly tool
for comprehensive evaluation of the geographical origins of atmospheric
pollution: Wind and trajectory analyses, Environ. Model. Softw., 88,
183–187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.022</a>, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Poulain, L., Spindler, G., Grüner, A., Tuch, T., Stieger, B., van Pinxteren, D., Petit, J.-E., Favez, O., Herrmann, H., and Wiedensohler, A.: Multi-year ACSM measurements at the central European research station Melpitz (Germany) – Part 1: Instrument robustness, quality assurance, and impact of upper size cutoff diameter, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4973–4994, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4973-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4973-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Raynaud, D., Hingray, B., Zin, I., Anquetin, S., Debionne, S., and Vautard,
R.: Atmospheric analogues for physically consistent scenarios of surface
weather in Europe and Maghreb: Atmospheric analogues for physically
consistent surface weather, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 2160–2176,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4844" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4844</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Reis, S., Simpson, D., Friedrich, R., Jonson, J. E., Unger, S., and
Obermeier, A.: Road traffic emissions – predictions of future contributions
to regional ozone levels in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 34, 4701–4710,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00202-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00202-8</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Sandradewi, J., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Perron, N., Alfarra,
M. R., Lanz, V. A., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Using Aerosol
Light Absorption Measurements for the Quantitative Determination of Wood
Burning and Traffic Emission Contributions to Particulate Matter, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 42, 3316–3323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es702253m" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es702253m</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Sicard, P., De Marco, A., Agathokleous, E., Feng, Z., Xu, X., Paoletti, E.,
Rodriguez, J. J. D., and Calatayud, V.: Amplified ozone pollution in cities
during the COVID-19 lockdown, Sci. Total Environ., 735, 139542,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139542" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139542</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Siciliano, B., Dantas, G., da Silva, C. M., and Arbilla, G.: Increased ozone
levels during the COVID-19 lockdown: Analysis for the city of Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil, Sci. Total Environ., 737, 139765,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139765" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139765</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Srivastava, D., Favez, O., Petit, J.-E., Zhang, Y., Sofowote, U. M., Hopke,
P. K., Bonnaire, N., Perraudin, E., Gros, V., Villenave, E., and Albinet,
A.: Speciation of organic fractions does matter for aerosol source
apportionment. Part 3: Combining off-line and on-line measurements, Sci.
Total Environ., 690, 944–955,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.378" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.378</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling
System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Stirnberg, R., Cermak, J., Kotthaus, S., Haeffelin, M., Andersen, H., Fuchs, J., Kim, M., Petit, J.-E., and Favez, O.: Meteorology-driven variability of air pollution (PM<sub>1</sub>) revealed with explainable machine learning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3919–3948, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3919-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3919-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Lei, L., Zhou, W., Chen, C., He, Y., Sun, J., Li, Z., Xu, W., Wang,
Q., Ji, D., Fu, P., Wang, Z., and Worsnop, D. R.: A chemical cocktail during
the COVID-19 outbreak in Beijing, China: Insights from six-year aerosol
particle composition measurements during the Chinese New Year holiday, Sci.
Total Environ., 742, 140739,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140739" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140739</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Tian, J., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Yan, M., Liu, H., Zhang, N., Ran, W., and Cao, J.: Impacts of primary emissions and secondary aerosol formation on air pollution in an urban area of China during the COVID-19 lockdown, Environ. Int., 150, 106426, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106426" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106426</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Toscano, D. and Murena, F.: The Effect on Air Quality of Lockdown Directives
to Prevent the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Campania Region – Italy:
Indications for a Sustainable Development, Sustainability, 12, 5558,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145558" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145558</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Van Den Dool, H. M.: Searching for analogues, how long must we wait?, Tellus
A, 46, 314–324, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.1994.t01-2-00006.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.1994.t01-2-00006.x</a>,
1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Vautard, R., Colette, A., van Meijgaard, E., Meleux, F., Jan van Oldenborgh,
G., Otto, F., Tobin, I., and Yiou, P.: Attribution of Wintertime
Anticyclonic Stagnation Contributing to Air Pollution in Western Europe,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, S70–S75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0113.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0113.1</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Viatte, C., Petit, J.-E., Yamanouchi, S., Van Damme, M., Doucerain, C.,
Germain-Piaulenne, E., Gros, V., Favez, O., Clarisse, L., Coheur, P.-F.,
Strong, K., and Clerbaux, C.: Ammonia and PM<sub>2.5</sub> Air Pollution in Paris
during the 2020 COVID Lockdown, Atmos., 12, 160,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020160</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, P., Chen, K., Zhu, S., Wang, P., and Zhang, H.: Severe air pollution
events not avoided by reduced anthropogenic activities during COVID-19
outbreak, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 158, 104814,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104814" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104814</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Yiou, P., Salameh, T., Drobinski, P., Menut, L., Vautard, R., and Vrac, M.:
Ensemble reconstruction of the atmospheric column from surface pressure
using analogues, Clim. Dynam., 41, 1333–1344,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1626-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1626-3</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Favez, O., Petit, J.-E., Canonaco, F., Truong, F., Bonnaire, N., Crenn, V., Amodeo, T., Prévôt, A. S. H., Sciare, J., Gros, V., and Albinet, A.: Six-year source apportionment of submicron organic aerosols from near-continuous highly time-resolved measurements at SIRTA (Paris area, France), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 14755–14776, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14755-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14755-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Zorita, E. and Storch, H. V.: The Analog Method as a Simple Statistical
Downscaling Technique: Comparison with More Complicated Methods, J. Climate,
12, 2474–2489, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Zotter, P., Herich, H., Gysel, M., El-Haddad, I., Zhang, Y., Močnik, G., Hüglin, C., Baltensperger, U., Szidat, S., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Evaluation of the absorption Ångström exponents for traffic and wood burning in the Aethalometer-based source apportionment using radiocarbon measurements of ambient aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4229–4249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4229-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4229-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
