<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-17115-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Changes in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and their sources <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> in the US
from 1990 to 2010</article-title><alt-title>Changes in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and their sources in the US</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Changes in PM${}_{{2.5}}$ concentrations and their sources in the US}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K. Skyllakou et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Skyllakou</surname><given-names>Ksakousti</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1630-3474</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Rivera</surname><given-names>Pablo Garcia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1742-696X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Dinkelacker</surname><given-names>Brian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Karnezi</surname><given-names>Eleni</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9781-2552</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Kioutsioukis</surname><given-names>Ioannis</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4653-8442</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Hernandez</surname><given-names>Carlos</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Adams</surname><given-names>Peter J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff6">
          <name><surname>Pandis</surname><given-names>Spyros N.</given-names></name>
          <email>spyros@chemeng.upatras.gr</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences (FORTH/ICE-HT), 26504,
Patras, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Earth Sciences, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, 08034, Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Physics, University of Patras, 26500, Patras, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon
University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, 26500,
Patras, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Spyros N. Pandis (spyros@chemeng.upatras.gr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>November</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>17115</fpage><lpage>17132</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e200">Significant reductions in emissions of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and primary particulate matter (PM) took place in the US from 1990 to 2010. We evaluate here our understanding of the links between
these emissions changes and corresponding changes in concentrations and
health outcomes using a chemical transport model, the Particulate Matter
Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (PMCAMx), for 1990, 2001, and 2010. The use of the Particle Source Apportionment Algorithm (PSAT) allows us to link the concentration reductions to the sources of the corresponding
primary and secondary PM. The reductions in SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (64 %,
mainly from electric-generating units) during these 20 years have dominated the reductions in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to a 45 % reduction in sulfate levels. The predicted sulfate reductions are in excellent agreement with the
available measurements. Also, the reductions in elemental carbon (EC)
emissions (mainly from transportation) have led to a 30 % reduction in EC concentrations. The most important source of organic aerosol (OA) through
the years according to PMCAMx is biomass burning, followed by biogenic
secondary organic aerosol (SOA). OA from on-road transport has been reduced
by more than a factor of 3. On the other hand, changes in biomass burning OA and biogenic SOA have been modest. In 1990, about half of the US
population was exposed to annual average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations above 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, but by 2010 this fraction had dropped to practically
zero. The predicted changes in concentrations are evaluated against the
observed changes for 1990, 2001, and 2010 in order to understand whether the model represents reasonably well the corresponding processes caused by the
changes in emissions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e278">During recent decades, regulations by the US Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) have led to significant reductions in the emissions of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, VOCs, and primary PM from electrical utilities, industry,
transportation, and other sources (US EPA, 2011). Xing et al. (2013) estimated
that, from 1990 to 2010, emissions of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the US were reduced by
67 %, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by 48 %, non-methane VOCs by 49 %, and primary
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by 34 %. An increase in ammonia emissions by 11 % was estimated for this 20-year period. At the same time, there have been
significant observed reductions in the ambient PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in
practically all areas of the US (Meng et al., 2019). However, our ability to
link these changes in estimated emissions to the observed changes in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> faces challenges. The available PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> composition and mass
concentration measurements are sparse in space and are quite limited before
2001. Three-dimensional chemical transport models (CTMs) are well suited to
help address this problem, since they simulate all the major processes that
impact PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and transport.</p>
      <?pagebreak page17116?><p id="d1e363">There have been several efforts to quantify historical changes in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels and composition. These rely heavily on measurements (both ground
and satellite for the more recent changes) and on a number of statistical
techniques including land-use regression models to calculate the
concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over specific areas and periods (Eeftens et
al., 2012; Beckerman et al., 2013; Ma et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017a).
Milando et al. (2016) used positive matrix factorization (PMF) of PM
measurements to interpret the observed trends of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from 2004 to
2011 in Detroit and Chicago. They concluded that as secondary sulfate was
declining, emissions from biomass burning, vehicles, and metal sources are becoming relatively more important. More recent efforts also include
applications of chemical transport models. For example, Meng et al. (2019)
estimated historical PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations over North America from
1981 to 2016, combining the predictions of GEOS-Chem, satellite remote sensing, and ground-based measurements. That study focused on the estimation
of total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels to assess long-term changes in exposure and
associated health risks. The composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and its sources
were not analyzed in that work. Jin et al. (2019) combined information from
ground-based observations, remote sensing, and chemical transport models to estimate that the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-related mortality decreased by 67 % in New
York State from 2002 to 2012. Li et al. (2017b) combined in situ and satellite observations with the global CTM, GEOS-Chem, to quantify global
and regional trends in the chemical composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over
1989–2013. They concluded that the predicted average trends for North
America were consistent with the available measurements for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
secondary inorganic aerosols, organic aerosols, and black carbon. Nopmongcol et al. (2017) used CAMx with the Ozone Source Apportionment Technology
(OSAT) and Particulate Source Apportionment Technology (PSAT) algorithms for
6 different years within 5 decades (1970–2020) to calculate the contributions from different emission sources to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the US. The same meteorology and the same natural emissions (including wildfires) were used for all 6 simulated years. The authors concluded that the contribution of electrical generation units (EGUs) and on-road sources
to fine PM has declined in most areas, while the contributions of sources such as residential, commercial, and fugitive dust emissions stand out as
making large contributions to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that are not declining. The use
of constant meteorology did not allow the direct evaluation of these
predictions.</p>
      <p id="d1e476">In this study, we use period-specific meteorological data and
source-resolved emissions for every year simulated to estimate the concentrations, composition, and sources of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over 20 years in the
US. Three specific years are used as snapshots of US air quality in time.
Given that significant emissions changes have taken place over the decades
between the examined years, the predicted concentration changes reflect
mostly changes in these emissions plus some year-to-year meteorological variability. The model predictions are compared with the available
measurements. The sources responsible for the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reductions in
various areas of the country are identified, and their contribution to the reductions is quantified. We also quantify trends in population exposure and
estimated health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Model description</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Particulate Matter Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (PMCAMx)</title>
      <p id="d1e512">PMCAMx (Karydis
et al., 2010; Murphy and Pandis, 2010; Tsimpidi et al., 2010; Posner et al.,
2019) uses the framework of the CAMx model (Environ,
2006) to describe horizontal and vertical advection and diffusion, wet and
dry deposition, and gas- and aqueous-phase chemistry. A 10-size section (30 nm to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) aerosol sectional approach is used to dynamically track the evolution of the aerosol mass distribution. The aerosol species modeled
include sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, sodium, chloride, elemental carbon,
mineral dust, and primary and secondary organics. The Carbon Bond 05 (CB5)
mechanism (Yarwood et al., 2005) is used in this application
of PMCAMx for gas-phase chemistry calculations. The version of CB5 used here
includes 190 reactions of 79 surrogate gas-phase species. For condensation
and evaporation of inorganic species, a bulk equilibrium approach was used,
assuming equilibrium between the bulk inorganic aerosol and gas phases. The
partitioning of each semi-volatile inorganic species between the gas and
aerosol phases is determined by the ISORROPIA aerosol thermodynamics model
(Nenes et al., 1998). The mass transferred between
the two phases in each step is distributed to the size sections using
weighting factors based on the effective surface area of each size bin
(Pandis et al., 1993).
Organic aerosols (primary and secondary) are simulated using the volatility
basis set approach (Donahue et
al., 2006). For primary organic aerosols (POA), eight volatility bins, ranging from 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 298 K saturation
concentration, are used. Secondary organic aerosols (SOA) are split between aerosol formed from anthropogenic sources (aSOA) and from biogenic ones
(bSOA) and modeled with four volatility bins (1, 10, 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Murphy and Pandis, 2009). NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent yields (Lane et al., 2008) are used. For better
representation of the chemistry in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plumes, the plume-in-grid modeling approach of Karamchandani et al. (2011) has been used for the major
point sources following Zakoura and Pandis (2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>PSAT</title>
      <p id="d1e629">PSAT (Wagstrom et al., 2008; Wagstrom and Pandis, 2011a, b; Skyllakou et al., 2014, 2017) is an efficient algorithm that tracks
and computes the contributions of different sources to pollutant
concentrations. The advantages of PSAT are that it runs in parallel with
PMCAMx, so there is no need to<?pagebreak page17117?> modify the CTM for different applications, and that it is quite computationally efficient. PSAT takes advantage of the fact
that the molecules of each pollutant at each location, regardless of their source, have the same probability of reacting, depositing, or getting
transported to avoid repeating the simulations of these processes. For
secondary species, it follows the apportionment of their precursor vapors.
For example, the apportionment of secondary organic aerosol is based on the
apportionment of VOCs or IVOCs, sulfate on SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, nitrate on NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and ammonium on NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e659">In this study, we use the version of PSAT developed by Skyllakou et al. (2017) that is compatible with the volatility basis set to calculate the contribution of each emission source to the concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
its components.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Model application</title>
      <p id="d1e680">PMCAMx-PSAT was applied over the continental United States (CONUS) for the
years 1990, 2001, and 2010 using a grid of 132 by 82 cells with horizontal
dimensions of 36 km by 36 km (covering an area of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4752</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2952</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km)
and 14 layers of varying thickness up to an altitude of approximately 13 km.
We selected this resolution as it has been shown to be a viable option for
keeping computational and storage demands manageable while providing
sufficient quality for long-term simulations and air quality planning
applications (Gan et al., 2016). This coarse resolution
introduces errors in areas where there are significant PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gradients in space, including California and urban areas in the rest of the western US.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Meteorology</title>
      <p id="d1e711">Meteorological simulations were performed with the Weather Research
Forecasting model (WRF v3.6.1) over the CONUS area, with a horizontal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km and 36 vertical (sigma) levels up to a height of
about 20 km. The simulations were executed using 3 d re-initialization from observations. Initial and boundary conditions were generated from the
ERA-Interim global climate re-analysis database, together with the
terrestrial data sets for terrain height, land use, soil categories, etc., from the United States Geological Survey database. The WRF modeling system
was prepared and configured in a similar way to that described by Gilliam and Pleim (2010). For the model
physical parameterization, the Pleim–Xiu land surface model (Xiu and Pleim, 2002) was selected. Other
important WRF physics options used in this study include the Rapid Radiative
Transfer Model/Dudhia radiation schemes (Iacono et al., 2008), the
Asymmetric Convective Model version 2 for the planetary boundary layer
(Pleim, 2007a, b), the Morrison
double-moment cloud microphysics scheme (Morrison et al., 2008), and
version 2 of the Kain–Fritsch cumulus parameterization
(Kain, 2004). The selected WRF configuration is
recommended for air quality simulations
(Hogrefe et
al., 2015; Rogers et al., 2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e734">Emissions for the simulations were obtained from the internally consistent,
historical emission inventories of Xing et al. (2013) that
include source-resolved gas and primary particle emissions. Point source
sectors include EGUs included in the EPA's Integrated Planning Model (IPM), industrial sources not included in the IPM (non-EGU), and all other point sources in Canada and Mexico. Area sources include on-road emissions in the US, Canada, and Mexico, off-road emissions
for the entire domain, and all remaining non-biogenic sources. We used our WRF meteorology to drive the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from
Nature (MEGAN3) (Jiang et al.,
2018) using the default emission factors for all years to generate biogenic
emissions for the CONUS domain.</p>
      <p id="d1e737">In this application of PSAT, we used six different emission categories based on those described above plus initial and boundary conditions which are each
tracked separately by the model as different “sources”. As a result, the
emission source categories used are “road”, which includes road emissions over the US, “non-road”, which includes the off-road emissions of the entire domain, “EGU”, “non-EGU” as described above, “other”, which includes the sum
of the other point and area sources plus the “on-road” emissions from Canada
and Mexico, and finally biogenic emissions. Figure 1 depicts the total annual emissions for each source and each year.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e742">Annual emissions by each source for the whole domain for <bold>(a)</bold> elemental carbon, <bold>(b)</bold> fresh POA, <bold>(c)</bold> non-methane VOCs, <bold>(d)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e)</bold> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(f)</bold> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17115/2021/acp-21-17115-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e798">Biomass burning (included in the “other” category) was the dominant source
of EC and remained relatively constant during the simulated period. The
second most important source of EC was road transport, with the
corresponding emissions having been reduced by a factor of 3.5 from 1990 to
2010. The overall reduction in EC emissions was 40 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e801">Biomass burning and other sources were the dominant source also of POA, with almost constant contributions. Based on the emissions that Xing et al. (2013) reported in the category “other”, we can estimate that biomass
burning was responsible for 46 % of the total “other” POA emissions. This
contribution increased to 80 % in 2001 and 83 % in 2010. The PM emitted
from biomass burning, according to the inventory, is similar for these 3 years (Xing et al., 2013). The second most important source of POA during
1990 was road transport, contributing 5 %. This emission source was reduced by a factor of 3.5 from 1990 to 2010. Overall POA emissions in the inventory
were reduced by 27 % from 1990 to 2010.</p>
      <p id="d1e804">Emissions of VOCs by on-road sources were reduced by a factor of 3.5 during
these 20 years. On the other hand, the VOCs emitted by non-road transport
decreased by only 8 %. The biogenic VOC emissions varied from year to year
based on the prevailing meteorology, but their changes were<?pagebreak page17118?> less than
20 %. The total (anthropogenic and biogenic) VOC emissions decreased by
31 % from 1990 to 2010.</p>
      <p id="d1e807">The emissions of the most important SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source, EGUs, were reduced by 33 % from 1990 to 2001 and by 67 % from 1990 to 2010. This resulted in a
64 % reduction in the total SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over these 20 years.</p>
      <p id="d1e828">For NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the most important source is agriculture (included in the
“other” category), and the corresponding emissions increased by 9 % during
these 20 years.</p>
      <p id="d1e840">Road transportation is one of the major NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources, with the corresponding emissions having been reduced by 21 % from 1990 to 2001 and
by 58 % from 1990 to 2010. The second most important source of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1990 was the EGUs, which emitted 25 % less NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2001 and 66 %
less NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2010 compared to 1990. Total NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in the inventory were 47 % lower in 2010 compared to 1990.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Annual average concentrations and sources</title>
      <p id="d1e904">We examine first the source apportionment results of PMCAMx-PSAT for the
major components of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 3 simulated years.</p>
      <p id="d1e916">On-road transportation was a major source of EC, especially in urban areas in 1990 (Fig. 2). The EC concentrations originating from this source were
reduced by more than a factor of 3 from 1990 to 2010. The industrial sources
(EGU and non-EGU) contributed less than 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of EC in all areas during these years. The “other” source, which includes all types of
biomass burning, was the most important source during the simulated period. Long-range transport (LRT), which represents the transport from areas outside of the domain, contributed approximately 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e961">Predicted annual average ground-level PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> elemental carbon concentrations per source for 1990, 2001, and 2010.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17115/2021/acp-21-17115-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e980">The predicted average total OA levels defined as the sum of POA and SOA are
shown in Fig. 3. The OA originating from road transport was about 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during 1990 over the eastern US, but it was reduced to less than 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3<?pagebreak page17119?></mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during 2010. “Non-road” transport and “non-EGU”
emission sources had smaller contributions to OA, with less than 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in most areas during all years. Biogenic SOA was almost 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the southeastern US during both 1990 and 2001, but during 2010
it had higher concentrations in some areas. Especially in the south due to local meteorology, predicted SOA was much higher compared to 1990. In 2010, the biogenic VOC concentrations were on average 15 % higher compared to
1990, due mainly to the meteorological conditions during these 2 specific years. This small increase is consistent with the biogenic VOC emissions estimated by Sindelarova et al. (2014). Also, high OA concentrations were
predicted to originate from biomass burning during 1990. The average
contribution of long-range transport OA was approximately 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1086">Predicted annual average ground-level PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> organic (primary plus secondary) aerosol concentrations per source for 1990, 2001, and
2010. The EGU contributions are low and are not shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17115/2021/acp-21-17115-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page17120?><p id="d1e1104">Sulfate was the dominant component of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the eastern US in 1990, and the EGUs were its dominant source, contributing more than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over wide areas of the east (Fig. 4). The corresponding sulfate
concentrations from EGUs were reduced to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2001 and to
1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2010 due to the dramatic reduction in these SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over these 20 years. Sulfate concentrations originating from
non-EGU and other emission sources were 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or less during
all years. Long-range transport contributed approximately 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to the sulfate levels during the simulated period.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1229">Predicted annual average ground-level PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate concentrations per source for 1990, 2001, and 2010. The on-road, non-road, and biogenic contributions are low and are not shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17115/2021/acp-21-17115-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Evaluation of the model predictions</title>
      <?pagebreak page17121?><p id="d1e1255">The model was evaluated on both an annual and daily basis against ground-level measurements from the IMPROVE and CSN networks (STN US EPA,
2002; IMPROVE, 1995). The metrics used in the main analysis include the normalized mean bias (NMB), the normalized mean error (NME), the mean bias
(MB), the mean absolute gross error (MAGE), the fractional bias (FBIAS), and
the fractional error (FERROR) (Fountoukis et al., 2011):
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather"><mml:math id="M92" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NMB</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NME</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MB</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAGE</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FBIAS</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FERROR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the model-predicted value for site <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
corresponding observed value, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of sites. During 1990, there were only 27 measurement sites for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> composition, all part of the IMPROVE network, but this number increased dramatically in 2001 to
more than 100 and in 2010 to approximately 300 stations. There was almost an order of magnitude more measurements and stations for just PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration. The results for annual evaluation are
summarized in Table 1 and for the evaluation based on daily average
concentrations in Table 2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1634">Evaluation metrics for annual average concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and for its major components for each examined year.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAGE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NMB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NME</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">FBIAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">FERROR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Stations</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">EC </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">122</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">304</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">OA </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">121</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">306</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">Sulfate </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">118</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">327</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">Nitrate </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">114</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">321</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">Ammonium </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">113</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">326</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1040</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1067</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2486">Evaluation metrics for daily average concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and for its major components for each examined year.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAGE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NMB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NME</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">FBIAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">FERROR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Points</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Comment</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9" align="center">EC </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2940</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18 763</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">29 423</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9" align="center">OA </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2940</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18 706</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">29 412</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9" align="center">Sulfate </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3228</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18 077</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33 051</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9" align="center">Nitrate </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2998</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Problematic</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18 019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Problematic</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30 867</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Problematic</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9" align="center">Ammonium </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2996</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17 828</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30 162</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9" align="center">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2706</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Good</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">161 909</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Good</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">212 899</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Good</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2498"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Following Morris et al. (2005) criteria. Good: FBIAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.30, FERROR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.50. Average: FBIAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, FERROR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75. Problematic: FBIAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, FERROR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3527">PMCAMx reproduced the annual average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations with an
absolute fractional bias of less than 16 % and a fractional error of less than 25 % (Table 1). The highest bias was found for 1990, when measurements
from only 33 sites were available. During 2001 and 2010 when more than 1000
stations were operational, the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fractional bias was only 5 %. The model tends to underpredict PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the sites in the west and especially in California and tends to overpredict in the rest of the country
(Table S1 in the Supplement). The OA annual average concentrations were also reproduced with
little bias (less than 5 %) and fractional error less than 30 %. The
model had a slight tendency towards overprediction of sulfate with a
fractional bias of 17 %–28 % depending on the year, but the fractional error was still modest at 23 %–37 %. The EC annual levels were reproduced with
little bias (FBIAS equal to 6 %–8%) during 1990 and 2010, but there was a tendency towards overprediction during 2001 (FBIAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28 %), while the
fractional error was modest (28 %–39 %). The nitrate levels, especially in the high-nitrate areas, were underpredicted (FBIAS ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>%), and the error was relatively high compared to all other components
(54 %–61 %). Finally, the model did a<?pagebreak page17122?> relatively good job reproducing the
ammonium levels (FBIAS 4 %–17 % and FERROR 26 %–29 %). The low grid
resolution of these simulations introduced significant errors in California, where significant spatial gradients are encountered. The evaluation results
without the Californian sites are summarized in Table S2. For example, the
nitrate bias is  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % when the measurements in California are excluded from the evaluation.</p>
      <p id="d1e3605">According to Morris et al. (2005), the level of the performance of the model
for daily resolution is considered excellent if it meets the following
criteria: FBIAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and FERROR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.35. It is good if FBIAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and FERROR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.50, it is average if FBIAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and FERROR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75, and it is problematic if FBIAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and FERROR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75. Based on these criteria, the ability of the model to reproduce the daily average concentrations
during all simulated years is good for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, average for EC, OA,
sulfate, and ammonium, and problematic for nitrate. The daily PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, for which there are many more stations and measurements in
2001 and 2010, are reproduced with a fractional bias of 3 % to 13 % and a fractional error of less than 50 % (Table 2). For 1990, there is little bias,
while there is a small tendency towards overprediction in the later years.</p>
      <p id="d1e3719">The version of PMCAMx used in these simulations has difficulties reproducing
the nitrate levels. There several reasons for these problems, including the spatial resolution used here and the assumption of bulk equilibrium, which will be analyzed further in future work. PMCAMx has a small tendency towards
underprediction of the OA and the EC. There is also a tendency towards
overprediction of the sulfate and, as a result, the ammonium too.</p>
      <p id="d1e3722">We also followed the approach suggested by Emery et al. (2017) for the
characterization of the model performance. This approach relies on the NMB,
NME, and correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) as metrics. The results of the corresponding analysis are summarized in Tables S4, S5, and S6 and suggest that the model is acceptable for all components and periods, with two
exceptions: sulfate during 2010 and ammonium during 2001.</p>
      <?pagebreak page17123?><p id="d1e3732">One of the important results of this evaluation is the relatively consistent
performance of PMCAMx during the different years. The use of a consistent
emission inventory, consistent meteorology, and measurements has probably contributed to this outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Regional contributions of sources to PM${}_{{2.5}}$ components}?><title>Regional contributions of sources to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> components</title>
      <p id="d1e3753">The US was divided into seven regions (Fig. 5) to facilitate the spatial analysis of the source contributions and their changes during the simulated
period. The Northeast (NE) region includes major cities such as New York,
Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Pittsburgh, while the Mideast (ME) includes the Ohio River valley area with a number of electrical generation units. The Midwest (MW) has significant agricultural activities, while much
of the West (WE) is relatively sparsely populated. California (CA) was kept
separate from the other western regions. The southern US was split into a
Southeast region (SE) with significant biogenic emissions and the Southwest (SW) with much less vegetation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3758">Definition of the seven regions used in the analysis.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17115/2021/acp-21-17115-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3767">Figure 6a shows the predicted average concentrations of EC for each year in
each region. The highest concentrations for 1990 were predicted in the Mideast, followed by the Northeast and California. Biomass burning, included in the “other” source, was the dominant source of EC in all
regions, with relatively constant concentrations through the years, except from CA, where the contribution from this source in 1990 was much higher due
to the annual variation in fires. There was significant reduction in the EC levels in all regions except for the West, where the EC originates mainly
from biomass burning and long-range transport. The highest reductions were
predicted for the eastern US. Figure 6b shows the population exposure
(Walker et al., 1999), which is calculated in this work as the product of
the average annual concentration of each computational cell times the
population living in the cell. The US population distribution was<?pagebreak page17124?> calculated
for each year based on the US Census Bureau (2019) data and is different for
1990, 2001, and 2010. The population distribution of 2001 is assumed to be the same as that of 2000. The population exposure is significant in areas
with high population density, for example in CA. The US population increased
from 1990 to 2010 by almost 24 %. This increase would have led to a
corresponding increase in total population exposure if the emissions had not
changed during this period.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3773">Sources of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> EC for the different regions during 1990,
2001, and 2010 for <bold>(a)</bold> average concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(b)</bold> population exposure (persons <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17115/2021/acp-21-17115-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3838">The source contributions to the annual average concentrations of OA are depicted in Fig. 7a. The predicted concentrations of OA in 1990 in the
eastern US (NE, SE, and ME regions) were almost 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and, in the other regions, less than 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. OA originating from biomass burning dominated the concentrations of OA during all years and regions.
Biogenic SOA was the second most significant OA component in the Southeast. OA originating from on-road transport contributed, according to the model, almost 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during 1990 and almost 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
during 2010 in the eastern US. Significant reductions in OA are predicted for the Northeast, Mideast, and California but moderate reductions for the Midwest, West, and Southwest. The OA in the Southeast has more complex
behavior due to the predicted increase in biogenic SOA in 2010 that leads to a small increase in the total OA compared to 2001. The population exposure
for OA (Fig. 7b) is almost the same for the Northeast and Mideast during 1990, and it decreased during 2001 and 2010. For the Midwest, West, and Southwest,
the population exposure to OA remained almost constant through the years. For all regions, the highest population exposure was due to biomass burning and
the “other” sources. In addition, 20 % of the population exposure was
due to road transport during 1990 in the highest populated areas (NE, ME, and CA), but this percentage was reduced to almost 10 % during 2010.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3924">Sources of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> OA for the different regions during 1990,
2001, and 2010 for <bold>(a)</bold> average concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(b)</bold> population exposure (persons <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17115/2021/acp-21-17115-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3989">The highest concentrations of sulfate for 1990 are predicted in the eastern US (NE, ME, and SE) in regions downwind of the EGUs, which are the dominant SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source in these areas (Fig. 8a). The drastic reductions in the EGU emissions are predicted to have led to major reductions in the sulfate
levels in these three regions. More modest but significant reductions in sulfate are also predicted for the Midwest and the Southwest. The reductions in the West and in California from the EGU source are small given that the
sulfate there even in the 1990s was relatively low and was dominated on
average by long-range transport. Regarding the population exposure for NE
and ME, the percentage of population exposure due to EGUs during 1990 was
58 % for the NE and 64 % for the ME, but during 2010 these percentages
were reduced to 44 % and 53 %, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e4003">Sources of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate for the different regions during
1990, 2001, and 2010 for <bold>(a)</bold> average concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(b)</bold> population exposure (persons <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17115/2021/acp-21-17115-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4069">The mortality rates caused by total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were also calculated for the
three simulated periods, following the relationships of Tessum et al. (2019)
and using the death rates of the US population by Murphy et al. (2013). We estimated 861 deaths per 100 000 persons for 1990, 777 for 2001, and 658 for
2010.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Linking average changes in emissions, concentrations, and exposure</title>
      <p id="d1e4089">The 72 % reduction in emissions of EC from road transport, from 1990 to 2010 according to PMCAMx, led to a 72 % reduction in EC concentrations and
a 70 % reduction in human exposure to EC from this source (Table 3). The
changes in concentrations are practically the same as those of the emissions
because EC is inert and the atmospheric processes that affect it (transport
and removal) are close to linear. The small difference between the change in
emissions and that of exposure is due to small differences in the spatial
distributions of the EC concentrations from road transport and the
population density. The differences are small because most road transport
emissions are in densely populated areas. The similarity in the fractional
change in emissions and concentrations applies as expected to all EC source types (Table 3). However, for all these other sources the reduction in
exposure is less than the reduction in emissions (or concentrations). For
example, the 44 % reduction in EC emissions from non-road transport was accompanied by a 43 % reduction in concentrations but a 35 % reduction in human exposure. This is due to the location of the reductions in these non-road transport emissions. A significant fraction of these reductions
took place away from densely populated regions (e.g., in agricultural
regions); therefore, they resulted in a smaller reduction in human exposure. The situation is a little different for total EC. The 40 % reduction in emissions is predicted to have led to a 31 % reduction in concentration.
The difference here is due to the contributions of long-range transport (sources outside of the US), which are assumed to have remained<?pagebreak page17125?> approximately
constant during this period. The predicted reduction in exposure is 33 %
and is due to the local sources. The changes in EC exposure in each region
are depicted in Fig. 6b.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4095">Percentage changes in emissions from each source and corresponding changes in average concentrations and exposure from 1990 to 2010.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Road</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Non-road</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">EGU</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Non-EGU</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Biogenic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Other</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Total</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">EC 1990 to 2010 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Emissions (EC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Concentrations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>31</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Exposure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">Fresh POA 1990 to 2010 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Emissions (fresh POA)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Concentrations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Exposure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">SOA 1990 to 2010 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Emissions (IVOCs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>VOCs)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>31</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Concentrations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Exposure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">Sulfate 1990 to 2010 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Emissions (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>64</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Concentrations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Exposure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e4951">The changes in fresh POA are a little more interesting because it is treated
as semi-volatile and reactive in PMCAMx. For all US sources, the reduction
in concentrations is a little higher than that of the emissions (Table 3).
For example, a 25 % reduction in POA emissions of non-road POA is predicted to have resulted in a 30 % reduction in the POA concentrations. This difference is due mostly to the nonlinear nature of the partitioning of these emissions between the gas and particulate phases. As the emissions are reduced, the corresponding OA concentrations are reduced, and
more of the organic material is transferred to the gas phase to maintain
equilibrium. This additional evaporation leads to an additional reduction in the POA concentrations. This is the case for all the sources, so the 27 % reduction in POA emissions corresponds according to PMCAMx to a 33 %
average reduction in POA concentrations. The reduction in exposure is, in
absolute terms, a little less than that of the concentrations for the same
reasons as for EC. This difference is small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) for
road transport but more<?pagebreak page17127?> significant for sources located outside urban centers (e.g., for EGU it is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for exposure).</p>
      <p id="d1e4995">The reductions predicted by PMCAMx for SOA (aSOA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> bSOA) concentrations are
far more complex than those of fresh POA, since the formation of secondary
organic species involves nonlinear processes such as partitioning, dependence on oxidant levels, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dependence of the yields, and the complexity of the chemical aging. Overall, PMCAMx predicts that the
reductions in exposure are less than the reductions in average
concentrations over the US, which are also less than the reductions in the emissions of the anthropogenic volatile and intermediate volatility organic
compounds. One explanation for this behavior is that the simultaneous decreases in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels have led to increased SOA formation yields. A
second factor is the time required for the formation of SOA, especially when multiple generations of reactions are required. The result of this time
delay is that SOA is often produced away from its sources located in high urban density areas. The reasons for this complex behavior will be analyzed in
detail in future work.</p>
      <p id="d1e5023">The predicted reductions in sulfate concentrations are less than the
reductions in emissions due mainly to the nonlinearity of the aqueous-phase conversion of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to sulfate (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016) (Table 3). Such
nonlinearity has been predicted also in past CTM applications (Karydis et al., 2007; Tsimpidi et al., 2007). Taking
into account the transport of some of the sulfate from areas outside of the
US, the model predicts that the 64 % reduction in SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions has
resulted in a 45 % reduction in the sulfate concentration on average. The reduction in exposure is a little less, 40 % on average, because both the
major sources of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are located and the higher reductions in sulfate take place, according to PMCAMx, away from the major urban centers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Distribution of population exposure to PM${}_{{2.5}}$ from different sources}?><title>Distribution of population exposure to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from different sources</title>
      <p id="d1e5072">We have calculated the percentage of people exposed to different PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from the major sources (“other”, “EGUs”, “road transport”)
for the three different periods. Almost half of the US population was
exposed to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations above 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1990. A
decade later this percentage was less than 20 % and close to zero during
2010 (Fig. 9a). During 1990, almost 90 % of the US population was exposed
to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations above 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the suggested
annual mean by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2006). This percentage
was reduced to 83 % in 2001 and 70 % in 2010 (Figs. 9a and  S2h).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e5145">Distributions of population exposed to annual average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
during 1990 (grey), 2001 (red), and 2010 (blue) and for the dominant sources of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: <bold>(a)</bold> total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (all sources), <bold>(b)</bold> other, <bold>(c)</bold> EGU, and <bold>(d)</bold> road transport.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/17115/2021/acp-21-17115-2021-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5194">The predicted distribution of the population exposed to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
the “other” source in 1990 covered a wide range extending from approximately 1 to 16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The exposure from these sources was reduced
significantly in the following years, mainly due to the reductions in the emissions of paved/unpaved road dust, prescribed burning, and industrial
emissions (Xing et al., 2013). The average emissions from wildfires did not
change appreciably, but this distribution was sharper in 2010, with maximum
percentages of people exposed appearing for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
ranging from 5 to 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The random spatial variation of
biomass burning sources can affect areas with different population densities.</p>
      <p id="d1e5257">The exposure of the population to primary and secondary PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
EGUs has dramatically decreased (Fig. 9c). In 1990, according to PMCAMx, 56 % of the US population was exposed to more than 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from
this source. This percentage was reduced to 39 % in 2001 and to 2 % in
2010. For the threshold of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the reduction was from 18 % in 1990 to 1 % in 2001 and to practically zero in 2010.</p>
      <p id="d1e5309">Similarly, significant decreases are predicted for road transport
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. While in 1990 79 % of the population was exposed to levels exceeding 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, this percentage was 58 % in 2001 and 18 %
in 2010 (Fig. 9d). The corresponding changes for 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were from 27 % (1990) to 8 % (2001) and to zero (2010).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <label>4.6</label><title>Predicted spatial changes in concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e5369">We calculated the predicted changes in annual average concentrations between 1990 and 2010 for the main PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> components. Figure S3 shows the
reductions in EC concentrations from 1990 to 2010. The reductions in the EC emissions resulted in total reductions in the average concentrations of
around 30 % in the 20-year period. Reductions above 20 % are predicted not only in the large urban areas, but also in large regions in
both the eastern and western US.</p>
      <p id="d1e5381">Average organic aerosol levels were reduced according to PMCAMx by close to
1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1990 to 2010 in a wide area extending from the
Great Lakes to Tennessee but also in parts of the eastern seaboard (Fig. S4). These reductions correspond to 35 %–45 % of the OA in both the NE and California.</p>
      <p id="d1e5404">From 1990 to 2010, sulfate was reduced by 50 %–60 % in the part of the
country to the east of the Mississippi. The corresponding reductions in the
middle of the country and in the western states from 1990 to 2010 were in
the 20 %–30 % range for the relatively low sulfate levels in these regions
(Fig. S5). These simulations suggest that the eastern US has benefited more both in an absolute and in a relative sense from these reductions in
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e5416">We also compared the predicted and observed concentration changes, using the
Pearson correlation coefficient and the average percentage differences, summarized in Table 4. Also, as far as the exposure changes are concerned, because of the way that exposure is defined (concentration times population)
and the population is measured, the evaluation metrics of our exposure
predictions are exactly the same as the evaluation metrics of our
concentration predictions. For the first two cases (1990 to 2001 and 1990 to
2010) there were only a few measurements available for 1990. The model
reproduces quite well the predicted changes against the observed changes for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and its components (Fig. S6).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e5432">Average observed and predicted PM percentage changes and Pearson's correlation coefficient calculated for each comparison case.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Observed changes</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Predicted changes</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Number</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">of sites</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">EC </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990 to 2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001 to 2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990 to 2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.91</bold><inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">OA </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990 to 2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001 to 2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990 to 2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">Sulfate </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990 to 2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.88</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001 to 2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.92</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990 to 2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.97</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990 to 2001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.81</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2001 to 2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.61</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">636</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990 to 2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.82</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e5435"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Fourteen CSN sites reporting increases in EC, probably due to the change in the measurement protocol in the 2007–2009 period, have been excluded from this
analysis.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The correlations in bold are statistically significant for a
significance level of 5 %.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page17128?><p id="d1e5945">For EC, the correlation was high between 1990 and 2001, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and between 1990 and 2010, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the analysis for the
changes up to 2010 is complicated by the change in the EC measurement
protocol in several CSN sites in the period from 2007 to 2010. The change
from the thermal optical transmittance (TOT) to the thermal optical reflectance (TOR) resulted in small
increases in the reported EC that were of similar magnitude to the predicted changes due to the emission reductions. To partially address this issue, we do not include in the analysis the results from 14 CSN sites which reported
increases in the EC from 2001 to 2010. Excluding these sites, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated (Table 4). The data points from these sites can be seen in the
lower triangle of Fig. S6. The reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2001–2010 is probably due, at least partially, to this uncertainty in the measured changes.</p>
      <p id="d1e5991">The predicted average change in OA in the measurement sites from 1990 to 2001 was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, in good agreement with the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % in the same
locations. The predicted changes were reasonably well correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the measured ones during this decade. However, the model
performance during the next decade (2001–2010) deteriorates as it
underpredicts on average the changes (predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % versus observed
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), and the changes are not correlated with each other in space. Additional analysis suggested that, while the model does a reasonable job reproducing the changes in the western half of the country and the
northeastern quarter, it overpredicts the OA concentration in 2010 and thus
underpredicts the reductions in the southeastern US. Our analysis also
suggests that this is mainly due to an overprediction of the biogenic SOA in this part of the country. This is consistent with the anomalous predicted
increase in biogenic SOA from 2001 to 2010 in the southeastern US (Figs. 7 and S1).<?pagebreak page17129?> This interesting discrepancy regarding the predicted and observed changes in biogenic SOA will be analyzed in detail in a subsequent paper.</p>
      <p id="d1e6046">For sulfate, the model reproduced well the observed changes for the three
comparison periods, with Pearson's correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1990 to 2001, 0.97 from 1990 to 2010, and 0.92 from 2001 to 2010 (Table 4). Despite the nonlinearity in the behavior of sulfate, the average
predicted and observed percentage changes were consistent for the three
comparison periods.</p>
      <p id="d1e6061">Finally, for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> the model reproduces well the observed changes for
the three comparison periods with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (from 1990 to 2001), 0.82 (from 1990 to 2010), and 0.61 (from 2001 to 2010). The average percentage changes
for the observations and the predictions were close for all the cases (Table 4).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e6095">The CTM, PMCAMx, was used to simulate the changes in source contributions to
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and its components over 2 decades, accounting for changes in emissions and meteorology with internally consistent methods. Biomass
burning and “other” sources, primarily including construction processes, mining, agriculture, waste disposal, and other miscellaneous sources,
contributed approximately half of the total (primary and secondary)
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the examined 20-year period. The corresponding average
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration levels due to this group of sources were reduced by 33 % from 1990 to 2010. EGUs were the second most important
source of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; the corresponding ambient PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels have
been reduced by 55 % and their contribution to the total from 16 % to
11 %. On-road transport was the third most important source of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The total average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from this source was reduced by 59 %, while
their contribution to the average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels has been reduced from
8 % to 5 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e6171">OA was a significant fraction of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Biomass burning included in the
“other” sources was the most important source of OA, with fractional contributions varying from 38 % to 52 % depending on the region.
Biogenic SOA was the second dominant component of OA, with contributions ranging from 6 % to 22 % in the southern US.</p>
      <p id="d1e6183">The relationship between the changes in concentrations and changes in
exposure is determined by the spatial distributions of these two changes.
The more similar these distributions are, the closer the corresponding
changes. The reduction in exposure was less than the reduction in emissions
(or concentrations) for sources that are located away from densely populated
regions (non-road transport and non-EGUs) due to the spatial non-uniformity
of the corresponding PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reductions. For example, sulfate human
exposure by non-EGU sources was reduced by 46 % from 1990 to 2010, while the corresponding reduction in emissions was 62 %.</p>
      <?pagebreak page17130?><p id="d1e6195">From 1990 to 2010, the reduction in human exposure to EC was 33 %, to fresh POA 35 %, to sulfate 40 %, and to SOA (both anthropogenic
and biogenic) 8 %. The reduction in EC was mostly due to the 72 % reduction in on-road EC emissions and the reduction in sulfate due to the 67 % reduction in SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from EGUs.</p>
      <p id="d1e6208">Considering that the US population increased by almost 24 % from 1990 to
2010, the fact that the total population exposure to PM was reduced in most
areas indicates that the emission reductions were sufficient to overcome
this effect. The decreases in personal exposure have been higher than those of the total population exposure.</p>
      <p id="d1e6211">During the 20-year-long examined period, the fraction of the US population exposed to average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations above 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased from approximately 50 % to close to zero. In 1990, 12 % of
the US population was exposed to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, concentrations lower than the
suggested annual mean by the WHO (10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). This fraction
increased to 30 % in 2010.</p>
      <p id="d1e6273">PMCAMx reproduced the annual average concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with
fractional error less than 30 % for the three simulation periods. The
corresponding fractional biases were 16 % for 1990 and 5 % for both 2001
and 2010. The model also reproduces well the average reduction in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the measurement sites; the measured reduction was 28 %, while the model predicts a reduction of 30 %. A model weakness that requires
additional investigation is its tendency to predict an increase in the
biogenic SOA from 2001 to 2010 that appears inconsistent with the
observations.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6298">The code and simulation results are available upon request
(spyros@chemeng.upatras.gr).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e6301">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17115-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17115-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6310">KS performed the PMCAMx and PSAT simulations, analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript. PGR prepared the anthropogenic emissions and other
inputs for the simulations. BD performed MEGAN simulations and analyzed
the results; EK performed and evaluated the WRF simulations; IK set up the WRF simulations and assisted in the preparation of the meteorological
inputs. CH analyzed the simulation output. SNP and PJA designed and
coordinated the study and helped in the writing of the paper. All the authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6316">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e6322">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6328">This work was supported by the Center for Air, Climate, and Energy Solutions
(CACES), which was supported under assistance agreement no. R835873 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Horizon-2020 Project
REMEDIA of the European Union under grant agreement no. 874753.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6334">This paper was edited by Qiang Zhang and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beckerman, B. S., Jerrett, M., Serre, M., Martin, R. V., Lee, S.-J., van
Donkelaar, A., Ross, Z., Su, J., and Burnett, R. T.: A hybrid approach to
estimating national scale spatiotemporal variability of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
contiguous United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 7233–7241, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eeftens, M., Beelen, R., de Hoogh, K., Bellander, T., Cesaroni, G., Cirach,
M., Declercq, C., Delele, A., Dons, E., and de Nazelle, A.: Development of land
use regression models for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> absorbance, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Coarse</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
in 20 European study areas, results of the ESCAPE Project, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 46, 11195–11205, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Emery, C., Liu, Z., Russell, A. G., Odman, M. T., Yarwood, G., and Kumar,
N.: Recommendations on statistics and benchmarks to assess photochemical
model performance, J. Air Waste Manage., 67, 582–598, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Environ: Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions Version 4.40, Users
Guide, ENVIRON Int. Corp., Novato, CA, available at: <uri>http://www.camx.com</uri> (last access: November 2020), 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fountoukis, C., Racherla, P. N., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Polymeneas, P., Charalampidis, P. E., Pilinis, C., Wiedensohler, A., Dall'Osto, M., O'Dowd, C., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of a three-dimensional chemical transport model (PMCAMx) in the European domain during the EUCAARI May 2008 campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10331–10347, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10331-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-10331-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gan, C.-M., Hogrefe, C., Mathur, R., Pleim, J., Xing, J., Wong, D., Gilliam,
R., Pouliot, G., and Wei, C.: Assessment of the effects of horizontal grid
resolution on long-term air quality trends using coupled WRF-CMAQ
simulations, Atmos. Environ., 132, 207–216, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gilliam, R. C. and Pleim, J. E.: Performance assessment of new land surface and
planetary boundary layer physics in the WRF-ARW, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 49, 760–774, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hogrefe, C., Pouliot, G., Wong, D., Torian, A., Roselle, S., Pleim, J.,
Mathur, R.: Annual application and evaluation of the onlin<?pagebreak page17131?>e coupled WRF-CMAQ
system over North America under AQMEII phase 2, Atmos. Environ., 115,
683–694, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., and
Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases:
Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
2–9, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>IMPROVE: IMPROVE Data Guide. Univ. of California, Davis, available at:
<uri>https://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/OtherDocs/IMPROVEDataGuide/IMPROVEDataGuide.htm</uri> (last access: September 2020),
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jiang, X., Guenther, A., Potosnak, M., Geron, C., Seco, R., Karl, T., Kim,
S., Gu, L., and Pallardy, S.: Isoprene emission response to drought and the
impact on global atmospheric chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 183, 69–83, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jin, X., Fiore A. M., Civerolo, K., Bi, J., Liu, Y., Donkelaar, A., Martin,
R. V., Al-Hamdan, M., Zhang, Y., Insaf, T. Z., Kioumourtzoglou, M., He, M.
Z., and Kinney, P. L.: Comparison of multiple PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure products
for estimating health benefits of emission controls over New York State,
USA, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 084023, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2dcb" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/ab2dcb</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kain, J. S.: The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: An update, J.
Appl. Meteorol., 43, 170–181, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Karamchandani, P., Vijayaraghavan, K., and Yarwood, G.: Sub-grid scale plume
modeling, Atmosphere, 2, 389–406, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Karydis, V. A., Tsimpidi, A. P., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of a
three-dimensional chemical transport model (PMCAMx) in the eastern United
States for all four seasons, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D14211,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007890" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007890</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Karydis, V. A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Fountoukis, C., Nenes, A., Zavala, M., Lei,
W., Molina, L. T., and Pandis, S. N.: Simulating the fine and coarse inorganic
particulate matter concentrations in a polluted megacity, Atmos. Environ.,
44, 608–620, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lane, T. E., Donahue, N. M., and Pandis, S. N.: Effect of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on secondary
organic aerosol concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 6022–6027,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, L., Wu, A. H., Cheng, I., Chen, J.-C., and Wu, J.: Spatiotemporal estimation
of historical PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations using PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> meteorological
variables, and spatial effect, Atmos. Environ., 166, 182–191, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Boys, B. L., Hammer, M. S., Xu,
J.-W., Marais, E. A., Reff, A., Strum, M., Ridley, D. A., Crippa, M.,
Brauer, M., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in chemical composition of global and regional
population-weighted fine particulate matter estimated for 25 years, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 11185–11195, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, Z., Hu, X., Sayer, A. M., Levy, R., Zhang, Q., Xue, Y., Tong, S., Bi,
J., Huang, L., and Liu, Y.: Satellite-based spatiotemporal trends in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations: China, 2004–2013, Environ. Health Persp., 124,
184–192, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Meng, J., Li, C., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Hystad, P., and Brauer,
M.: Estimated long-term (1981–2016) concentrations of ambient fine
particulate matter across North America from chemical transport modeling,
satellite remote sensing and ground-based measurements, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 53, 5071–5079, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Milando, C., Huang, L., and Batterman, S.: Trends in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions,
concentrations and apportionments in Detroit and Chicago, Atmos. Environ.,
129, 197–209, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Morris, R. E., McNally, D. E., Tesche, T. W., Tonnesen, G., Boylan, J. W.,
and Brewer, P.: Preliminary Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air
Quality Model for 2002 over the Southeastern United States, J. Air Waste
Manage., 55, 1694–1708, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Morrison, H., Thompson, G., and Tatarskii, V.: Impact of cloud microphysics on
the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall
line: Comparison of one- and two-moment schemes, Mon. Weather Rev.,
137, 991–1007, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Murphy, B. N. and Pandis, S. N.: Simulating the formation of semivolatile
primary and secondary organic aerosol in a regional chemical transport
model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 4722–4728, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murphy, B. N. and Pandis, S. N.: Exploring summertime organic aerosol formation
in the Eastern United States using a regional-scale budget approach and
ambient measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D24216,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014418" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014418</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Murphy, S. L., Xu, J., and Kochanek, K. D.: Deaths: Final Data for 2010, Division of Vital Statistics National Vital Statistics Reports, 61, 4, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: a new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aq.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nopmongcol, U., Alvarez, Y., Jung, J., Grant, J., Kumar, N., and Yarwood,
G.: Source contributions to United States ozone and particulate matter over
five decades from 1970 to 2020, Atmos. Environ., 167, 116–128, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pandis, S. N., Wexler, A. S., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation and transport – II. Predicting the ambient secondary organic
aerosol size distribution, Atmos. Environ., 27, 2403–2416, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pleim, J. E.: A Combined local and nonlocal closure model for the
atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: Model description and testing, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46, 1383–1395, 2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pleim, J. E.: A combined local and nonlocal closure model for the
atmospheric boundary layer. Part II: Application and evaluation in a
mesoscale meteorological model, J.  Appl. Meteorol. Clim.,
46, 1396–1409, 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Posner, L. N., Theodoritsi, G., Robinson, A., Yarwood, G., Koo, B., Morris,
R., Mavko, M., Moore, T., and Pandis, S. N.: Simulation of fresh and
chemically-aged biomass burning organic aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 196,
27–37, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rogers, R. E., Deng, A., Stauffer, D. R., Gaudet, B. J., Jia, Y., Soong, S.
T., and Tanrikulu, S.: Application of the weather research and forecasting model
for air quality modeling in the San Francisco bay area, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 52, 1953–1973, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 3rd
Edn., John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, USA, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sindelarova, K., Granier, C., Bouarar, I., Guenther, A., Tilmes, S., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Kuhn, U., Stefani, P., and Knorr, W.: Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over the last 30 years, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9317–9341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Skyllakou, K., Murphy, B. N., Megaritis, A. G., Fountoukis, C., and Pandis, S. N.: Contributions of local and regional sources to fin<?pagebreak page17132?>e PM in the megacity of Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2343–2352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2343-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2343-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Skyllakou, K., Fountoukis, C., Charalampidis, P., and Pandis, S. N.:
Volatility-resolved source apportionment of primary and secondary organic
aerosol over Europe, Atmos. Environ., 167, 1–10, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tessum, C. W., Apte, J. S., Goodkind, A. L., Muller, N. Z., Mullins, K.
A., Paolella, D. A., Polasky, S., Springer, N. P., Thakrar, S. K.,
Marshall, J. D., and Hill, J. D.: Inequity in consumption of goods and
services adds to racial–ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 6001–6006, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Pandis, S. N.: Response of Inorganic Fine
Particulate Matter to Emission Changes of Sulfur Dioxide and Ammonia: The
Eastern United States as a Case Study, J. Air Waste Manage., 57,
1489–1498, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Zavala, M., Lei, W., Molina, L., Ulbrich, I. M., Jimenez, J. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of the volatility basis-set approach for the simulation of organic aerosol formation in the Mexico City metropolitan area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 525–546, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-525-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-525-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>US Census Bureau: Population Estimates, available at: <uri>https://www.census.gov</uri>, last access: November 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency): User Guide: Air Quality System,
Report, Research Triangle Park, N. C., available at:
<uri>https://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/ manuals/AQSUserGuide.pdf</uri> (last access:
September 2020), 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency): Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air
Act 1990–2020, Report Documents and Graphics, available at:
<uri>https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/summaryreport.pdf</uri> (last access: August 2021), 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wagstrom, K. M., Pandis, S. N., Yarwood, G., Wilson, G. M., and Morris, R. E.:
Development and application of a computationally efficient particulate
matter apportionment algorithm in a three-dimensional chemical transport
model, Atmos. Environ., 42, 5650–5659, 2008.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wagstrom, K. M. and Pandis, S. N.: Source receptor relationships for fine
particulate matter concentrations in the Eastern United States, Atmos.
Environ., 45, 347–356, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wagstrom, K. M. and Pandis, S. N.: Contribution of long-range transport to
local fine particulate matter concerns, Atmos. Environ., 45, 2730–2735,
2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Walker, S. E., Slordal, L. H., Guerreiro, C., Gram, F., and Gronskei, K. E.: Air
pollution exposure monitoring and estimation part II. Model evaluation and
population exposure, J. Environ. Monitor., 1, 321–326, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
WHO: Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide
and Sulfur Dioxide, GLOBAL Update 2005, Summary of Risk Assessment, World
Health Organization (WHO/SDE/PHE/OEH/06.02), 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xing, J., Pleim, J., Mathur, R., Pouliot, G., Hogrefe, C., Gan, C.-M., and Wei, C.: Historical gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in the United States from 1990 to 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7531–7549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7531-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7531-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Xiu, A. and Pleim, J. E.: Development of a land surface model. Part I:
Application in a Mesoscale Meteorological Model, J. Appl. Meteorol.,
40, 192–209, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Yarwood, G., Rao, S., Yocke, M., and Whitten, G. Z.: Updates to The Carbon Bond
Chemical Mechanism, Research Triangle Park, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zakoura, M. and Pandis, S. N: Improving fine aerosol nitrate predictions
using a Plume-in-Grid modeling approach, Atmos. Environ., 215, 116887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116887" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116887</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Changes in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations and their sources  in the US from 1990 to 2010</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Beckerman, B. S., Jerrett, M., Serre, M., Martin, R. V., Lee, S.-J., van
Donkelaar, A., Ross, Z., Su, J., and Burnett, R. T.: A hybrid approach to
estimating national scale spatiotemporal variability of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the
contiguous United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 7233–7241, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Eeftens, M., Beelen, R., de Hoogh, K., Bellander, T., Cesaroni, G., Cirach,
M., Declercq, C., Delele, A., Dons, E., and de Nazelle, A.: Development of land
use regression models for PM<sub>2.5</sub> absorbance, PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>Coarse</sub>
in 20 European study areas, results of the ESCAPE Project, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 46, 11195–11205, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Emery, C., Liu, Z., Russell, A. G., Odman, M. T., Yarwood, G., and Kumar,
N.: Recommendations on statistics and benchmarks to assess photochemical
model performance, J. Air Waste Manage., 67, 582–598, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Environ: Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions Version 4.40, Users
Guide, ENVIRON Int. Corp., Novato, CA, available at: <a href="http://www.camx.com" target="_blank"/> (last access: November 2020), 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Fountoukis, C., Racherla, P. N., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Polymeneas, P., Charalampidis, P. E., Pilinis, C., Wiedensohler, A., Dall'Osto, M., O'Dowd, C., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of a three-dimensional chemical transport model (PMCAMx) in the European domain during the EUCAARI May 2008 campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10331–10347, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10331-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10331-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Gan, C.-M., Hogrefe, C., Mathur, R., Pleim, J., Xing, J., Wong, D., Gilliam,
R., Pouliot, G., and Wei, C.: Assessment of the effects of horizontal grid
resolution on long-term air quality trends using coupled WRF-CMAQ
simulations, Atmos. Environ., 132, 207–216, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Gilliam, R. C. and Pleim, J. E.: Performance assessment of new land surface and
planetary boundary layer physics in the WRF-ARW, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 49, 760–774, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Hogrefe, C., Pouliot, G., Wong, D., Torian, A., Roselle, S., Pleim, J.,
Mathur, R.: Annual application and evaluation of the online coupled WRF-CMAQ
system over North America under AQMEII phase 2, Atmos. Environ., 115,
683–694, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., and
Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases:
Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
2–9, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
IMPROVE: IMPROVE Data Guide. Univ. of California, Davis, available at:
<a href="https://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/OtherDocs/IMPROVEDataGuide/IMPROVEDataGuide.htm" target="_blank"/> (last access: September 2020),
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, X., Guenther, A., Potosnak, M., Geron, C., Seco, R., Karl, T., Kim,
S., Gu, L., and Pallardy, S.: Isoprene emission response to drought and the
impact on global atmospheric chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 183, 69–83, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Jin, X., Fiore A. M., Civerolo, K., Bi, J., Liu, Y., Donkelaar, A., Martin,
R. V., Al-Hamdan, M., Zhang, Y., Insaf, T. Z., Kioumourtzoglou, M., He, M.
Z., and Kinney, P. L.: Comparison of multiple PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure products
for estimating health benefits of emission controls over New York State,
USA, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 084023, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2dcb" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2dcb</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Kain, J. S.: The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: An update, J.
Appl. Meteorol., 43, 170–181, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Karamchandani, P., Vijayaraghavan, K., and Yarwood, G.: Sub-grid scale plume
modeling, Atmosphere, 2, 389–406, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Karydis, V. A., Tsimpidi, A. P., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of a
three-dimensional chemical transport model (PMCAMx) in the eastern United
States for all four seasons, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D14211,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007890" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007890</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Karydis, V. A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Fountoukis, C., Nenes, A., Zavala, M., Lei,
W., Molina, L. T., and Pandis, S. N.: Simulating the fine and coarse inorganic
particulate matter concentrations in a polluted megacity, Atmos. Environ.,
44, 608–620, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Lane, T. E., Donahue, N. M., and Pandis, S. N.: Effect of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> on secondary
organic aerosol concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 6022–6027,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Li, L., Wu, A. H., Cheng, I., Chen, J.-C., and Wu, J.: Spatiotemporal estimation
of historical PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations using PM<sub>10</sub> meteorological
variables, and spatial effect, Atmos. Environ., 166, 182–191, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Boys, B. L., Hammer, M. S., Xu,
J.-W., Marais, E. A., Reff, A., Strum, M., Ridley, D. A., Crippa, M.,
Brauer, M., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in chemical composition of global and regional
population-weighted fine particulate matter estimated for 25 years, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 11185–11195, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, Z., Hu, X., Sayer, A. M., Levy, R., Zhang, Q., Xue, Y., Tong, S., Bi,
J., Huang, L., and Liu, Y.: Satellite-based spatiotemporal trends in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations: China, 2004–2013, Environ. Health Persp., 124,
184–192, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Meng, J., Li, C., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Hystad, P., and Brauer,
M.: Estimated long-term (1981–2016) concentrations of ambient fine
particulate matter across North America from chemical transport modeling,
satellite remote sensing and ground-based measurements, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 53, 5071–5079, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Milando, C., Huang, L., and Batterman, S.: Trends in PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions,
concentrations and apportionments in Detroit and Chicago, Atmos. Environ.,
129, 197–209, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Morris, R. E., McNally, D. E., Tesche, T. W., Tonnesen, G., Boylan, J. W.,
and Brewer, P.: Preliminary Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air
Quality Model for 2002 over the Southeastern United States, J. Air Waste
Manage., 55, 1694–1708, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Morrison, H., Thompson, G., and Tatarskii, V.: Impact of cloud microphysics on
the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall
line: Comparison of one- and two-moment schemes, Mon. Weather Rev.,
137, 991–1007, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, B. N. and Pandis, S. N.: Simulating the formation of semivolatile
primary and secondary organic aerosol in a regional chemical transport
model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 4722–4728, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, B. N. and Pandis, S. N.: Exploring summertime organic aerosol formation
in the Eastern United States using a regional-scale budget approach and
ambient measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D24216,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014418" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014418</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, S. L., Xu, J., and Kochanek, K. D.: Deaths: Final Data for 2010, Division of Vital Statistics National Vital Statistics Reports, 61, 4, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: a new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aq.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Nopmongcol, U., Alvarez, Y., Jung, J., Grant, J., Kumar, N., and Yarwood,
G.: Source contributions to United States ozone and particulate matter over
five decades from 1970 to 2020, Atmos. Environ., 167, 116–128, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Pandis, S. N., Wexler, A. S., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation and transport – II. Predicting the ambient secondary organic
aerosol size distribution, Atmos. Environ., 27, 2403–2416, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Pleim, J. E.: A Combined local and nonlocal closure model for the
atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: Model description and testing, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46, 1383–1395, 2007a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Pleim, J. E.: A combined local and nonlocal closure model for the
atmospheric boundary layer. Part II: Application and evaluation in a
mesoscale meteorological model, J.  Appl. Meteorol. Clim.,
46, 1396–1409, 2007b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Posner, L. N., Theodoritsi, G., Robinson, A., Yarwood, G., Koo, B., Morris,
R., Mavko, M., Moore, T., and Pandis, S. N.: Simulation of fresh and
chemically-aged biomass burning organic aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 196,
27–37, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Rogers, R. E., Deng, A., Stauffer, D. R., Gaudet, B. J., Jia, Y., Soong, S.
T., and Tanrikulu, S.: Application of the weather research and forecasting model
for air quality modeling in the San Francisco bay area, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 52, 1953–1973, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 3rd
Edn., John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, USA, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Sindelarova, K., Granier, C., Bouarar, I., Guenther, A., Tilmes, S., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Kuhn, U., Stefani, P., and Knorr, W.: Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over the last 30 years, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9317–9341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Skyllakou, K., Murphy, B. N., Megaritis, A. G., Fountoukis, C., and Pandis, S. N.: Contributions of local and regional sources to fine PM in the megacity of Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2343–2352, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2343-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2343-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Skyllakou, K., Fountoukis, C., Charalampidis, P., and Pandis, S. N.:
Volatility-resolved source apportionment of primary and secondary organic
aerosol over Europe, Atmos. Environ., 167, 1–10, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Tessum, C. W., Apte, J. S., Goodkind, A. L., Muller, N. Z., Mullins, K.
A., Paolella, D. A., Polasky, S., Springer, N. P., Thakrar, S. K.,
Marshall, J. D., and Hill, J. D.: Inequity in consumption of goods and
services adds to racial–ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 6001–6006, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Pandis, S. N.: Response of Inorganic Fine
Particulate Matter to Emission Changes of Sulfur Dioxide and Ammonia: The
Eastern United States as a Case Study, J. Air Waste Manage., 57,
1489–1498, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Zavala, M., Lei, W., Molina, L., Ulbrich, I. M., Jimenez, J. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of the volatility basis-set approach for the simulation of organic aerosol formation in the Mexico City metropolitan area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 525–546, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-525-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-525-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
US Census Bureau: Population Estimates, available at: <a href="https://www.census.gov" target="_blank"/>, last access: November 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency): User Guide: Air Quality System,
Report, Research Triangle Park, N. C., available at:
<a href="https://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/ manuals/AQSUserGuide.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access:
September 2020), 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency): Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air
Act 1990–2020, Report Documents and Graphics, available at:
<a href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/summaryreport.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: August 2021), 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Wagstrom, K. M., Pandis, S. N., Yarwood, G., Wilson, G. M., and Morris, R. E.:
Development and application of a computationally efficient particulate
matter apportionment algorithm in a three-dimensional chemical transport
model, Atmos. Environ., 42, 5650–5659, 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Wagstrom, K. M. and Pandis, S. N.: Source receptor relationships for fine
particulate matter concentrations in the Eastern United States, Atmos.
Environ., 45, 347–356, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Wagstrom, K. M. and Pandis, S. N.: Contribution of long-range transport to
local fine particulate matter concerns, Atmos. Environ., 45, 2730–2735,
2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Walker, S. E., Slordal, L. H., Guerreiro, C., Gram, F., and Gronskei, K. E.: Air
pollution exposure monitoring and estimation part II. Model evaluation and
population exposure, J. Environ. Monitor., 1, 321–326, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
WHO: Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide
and Sulfur Dioxide, GLOBAL Update 2005, Summary of Risk Assessment, World
Health Organization (WHO/SDE/PHE/OEH/06.02), 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Xing, J., Pleim, J., Mathur, R., Pouliot, G., Hogrefe, C., Gan, C.-M., and Wei, C.: Historical gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in the United States from 1990 to 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7531–7549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7531-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7531-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Xiu, A. and Pleim, J. E.: Development of a land surface model. Part I:
Application in a Mesoscale Meteorological Model, J. Appl. Meteorol.,
40, 192–209, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Yarwood, G., Rao, S., Yocke, M., and Whitten, G. Z.: Updates to The Carbon Bond
Chemical Mechanism, Research Triangle Park, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Zakoura, M. and Pandis, S. N: Improving fine aerosol nitrate predictions
using a Plume-in-Grid modeling approach, Atmos. Environ., 215, 116887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116887" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116887</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
