<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-16161-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Physical and chemical properties of black carbon and organic matter from different combustion and photochemical sources<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> using aerodynamic aerosol classification</article-title><alt-title>Physical and chemical properties of black carbon and organic matter from different sources</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Physical and chemical properties of black carbon and organic matter from different sources}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{D. Hu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Dawei</given-names></name>
          <email>dawei.hu@manchester.ac.uk</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff8">
          <name><surname>Alfarra</surname><given-names>M. Rami</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3925-3780</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Szpek</surname><given-names>Kate</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2073-586X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Langridge</surname><given-names>Justin M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Cotterell</surname><given-names>Michael I.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5533-7856</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Belcher</surname><given-names>Claire</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Rule</surname><given-names>Ian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Zixia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Chenjie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-4558</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>Yunqi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6476-4980</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Voliotis</surname><given-names>Aristeidis</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9710-9851</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>Mao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>Brett</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Smallwood</surname><given-names>Greg</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6602-1926</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Lobo</surname><given-names>Prem</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0626-6646</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Dantong</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3768-1770</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Haywood</surname><given-names>Jim M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Coe</surname><given-names>Hugh</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Allan</surname><given-names>James D.</given-names></name>
          <email>james.allan@manchester.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6492-4876</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of
Manchester, Manchester, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Manchester,
Manchester, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Observation Based Research, Met Office, Exeter, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>College for Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University
of Exeter, Exeter, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Metrology Research Centre, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa,
Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang
University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>a</label><institution>currently at: Qatar Environment and Energy Research Institute
(QEERI), Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU),<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Doha, Qatar</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Dawei Hu (dawei.hu@manchester.ac.uk) and James D. Allan
(james.allan@manchester.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>November</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>21</issue>
      <fpage>16161</fpage><lpage>16182</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>18</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9</day><month>September</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>September</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Dawei Hu et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e301">The physical and chemical properties of black carbon (BC) and organic
aerosols are important for predicting their radiative forcing in the
atmosphere. During the Soot Aerodynamic Size Selection for Optical
properties (SASSO) project and a EUROCHAMP-2020 transnational access
project, different types of light-absorbing carbon were studied, including
BC from catalytically stripped diesel exhaust, an inverted flame burner, a
colloidal graphite standard (Aquadag) and controlled flaming wood
combustion. Brown carbon (BrC) was also investigated in the form of organic
aerosol emissions from wood burning (pyrolysis and smouldering) and from the
nitration of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) proxies produced in a
photochemical reaction chamber. Here we present insights into the physical
and chemical properties of the aerosols, with optical properties presented
in subsequent publications. The dynamic shape factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of BC
particles and material density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of organic aerosols was
investigated by coupling a charging-free Aerodynamic Aerosol Classifier
(AAC) with a Centrifugal Particle Mass Analyzer (CPMA) and a Scanning Mobility
Particle Sizer (SMPS). The morphology of BC particles was captured by
transmission electron microscopy (TEM). For BC particles from the diesel
engine and flame burner emissions, the primary spherule sizes were similar,
around 20 nm. With increasing particle size, BC particles adopted more
collapsed/compacted morphologies for the former source but tended to show
more aggregated morphologies for the latter source. For particles emitted
from the combustion of dry wood samples, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of BC particles and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of organic aerosols were observed in the ranges 1.8–2.17 and
1.22–1.32 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Similarly, for wet wood samples,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges were 1.2–1.85 and 1.44–1.60 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. Aerosol mass spectrometry measurements show no clear
difference in mass spectra of the organic aerosols in individual burn phases
(pyrolysis or smouldering phase) with the moisture content of the wood
samples. This suggests that the effect moisture has on the organic chemical
profile of wood burning emissions is through changing the durations of the
different phases of the burn cycle, not through the chemical modification of
the individual phases. In this study, the incandescence signal of a Single Particle Soot Photometer (SP2) was calibrated with three<?pagebreak page16162?> different types of
BC particles and compared with that from an Aquadag standard that is
commonly used to calibrate SP2 incandescence to a BC mass. A correction
factor is defined as the ratio of the incandescence signal from an
alternative BC source to that from the Aquadag standard and took values of
0.821 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.002 (or 0.794 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.005), 0.879 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003 and 0.843 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.028 to 0.913 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.009 for the BC particles emitted from the
diesel engine running under hot (or cold idle) conditions, the flame burner
and wood combustion, respectively. These correction factors account for
differences in instrument response to BC from different sources compared to
the standardised Aquadag calibration and are more appropriate than the
common value of 0.75 recommended by Laborde et al. (2012b) when
deriving the mass concentration of BC emitted from diesel engines.
Quantifying the correction factor for many types of BC particles found
commonly in the atmosphere may enable better constraints to be placed on
this factor depending on the BC source being sampled and thus improve the
accuracy of future SP2 measurements of BC mass concentrations.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e428">Black carbon (BC) and brown carbon (BrC) aerosols are widely investigated
components of atmospheric aerosol because they can absorb solar radiation
and heat the atmosphere, causing a positive radiative forcing of climate
(Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; D. Liu et al., 2020; Bond et al., 2013; Haywood
and Shine, 1995). BC is emitted by incomplete combustion processes,
including from anthropogenic (e.g. diesel engines) and natural (e.g.
flaming combustion in wildfires) sources. BrC aerosols are organic aerosols
that absorb light in the visible and near-UV regions and are emitted
directly from biomass burning, biofuel combustion and biogenic processes
(Ramanathan et al., 2007; Bond, 2001; Andreae and Crutzen, 1997) or
formed through the chemical reaction processes in the atmosphere, including
the nitration of aromatic compounds (Zhang et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2011;
Harrison et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2015), formation of higher molecular-weight oligomers by acid-catalysed aldol-condensation reactions (Shapiro
et al., 2009; Bones et al., 2010; Noziere and Esteve, 2007) and reactions
of ammonium-containing species with (di)carbonyl species (Maxut et al.,
2015; Powelson et al., 2014; De Haan et al., 2017). Typically, the light
absorption coefficient for BC and BrC is wavelength-dependent over the
visible spectrum, with BrC exhibiting a stronger wavelength dependence
characterised by increasing absorption at progressively shorter visible
wavelengths (Kirchstetter et al., 2004; Corbin et al., 2019; Voliotis et
al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e431">Although BC and BrC are very important for climate, they are poorly
represented in atmospheric models (Zuidema et al., 2016).
This is in part due to the complex microphysical properties of BC and the
lack of accurate refractive index (RI) descriptions for both BC and BrC
(F. Liu et al., 2020). Fresh soot particles often exist in
the form of aggregates composed of primary spherules with an irregular and
highly fractal geometry (Xiong and Friedlander, 2001; Wentzel et al.,
2003). The morphology of these aggregates changes markedly during the
atmospheric ageing process, influencing the corresponding particle size and
optical properties (Zeng et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2008). For example,
after condensation of gaseous species such as sulfuric acid or water (under
high-relative-humidity (RH) environments) on soot particles, or coagulation
with the pre-existing particles, soot particles can experience restructuring,
and the shape of the soot particles becomes more similar to a spherical
particle (Zhang et al., 2008). The morphology of BC
particles can be measured directly by using scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) or transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Fu et al., 2006; Chen et
al., 2018; Ellis et al., 2016). However, the SEM/TEM approach only provides
particle shape information in two dimensions and does not provide real-time
characterisation. Alternatively, the particle morphology can be determined
by measuring its size and mass with different techniques (Chen et al.,
2018; Decarlo et al., 2004). A conventional approach is to classify
particles (generally using a differential mobility analyser, DMA, to select
monodisperse particles on their mobility size) and then measure particle
mass using a particle mass analyser (Zhang et al., 2008; Park et al.,
2003, 2004a, b;  Chen et al., 2018;
Wu et al., 2019). From the resulting information
about particle mass for different particle mobility sizes, the dynamic shape
factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined as the ratio of the drag force on the particle
divided by the drag force on the particle's volume equivalent sphere) and
fractal dimensions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be retrieved (DeCarlo et
al., 2004). Mobility-mass fractal dimension (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) has been reported
over a wide range of 2.2–2.8 for diesel exhaust particles
(Park et al., 2004a). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been reported as higher
than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, – defined as the scaling exponents between the radius of
gyration of an aggregate and the radius of primary spherules composing the
aggregate – but the two are not always directly equivalent, particularly in
the transition regime (Sorensen, 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e485">In recent decades, the RI of BC or BrC was derived by measuring the optical
properties for particles of controlled size, with studies commonly utilising
the DMA to classify charged aerosols on their electrical mobility diameter
(Cotterell et al., 2020). However, the DMA approach
suffers from transmitting a highly polydisperse and multi-modal distribution
in terms of physical size. Since this technique relies on the selection of
particles according to their electrical mobility from an aerosol ensemble
with a distribution of charges, transmitting particles with a single
electrical mobility can be achieved for multiple combinations of particle
charge and size. Thus, in addition to singly charged particles of the
desired size, larger particles with charge states greater than unity are
selected which can impact optical<?pagebreak page16163?> measurements significantly. Careful
consideration of the impacts of multiply charged particles on subsequent RI
derivations can go some way to reducing uncertainty in the resultant RI, but
this nevertheless remains a significant contributor to uncertainty
(Cotterell et al., 2020; Zarzana et al., 2014; Miles et al., 2011). Thus,
the classification of particles without relying on electrical charge should
reduce the uncertainty in refractive index retrievals from measured aerosol
optical properties. Important additional considerations in the retrieval of
refractive indices from optical spectroscopy data are the aerosol morphology
(described above) and mixing state. The mixing state can be probed using the
Single Particle Soot Photometer (SP2), which can measure the refractory BC
(rBC) mass content and optical size of individual particles. However, the SP2
needs an empirical calibration to retrieve the rBC mass from the
incandescence signal (Laborde et al., 2012a). The
conventional method to calibrate the incandescence channel of SP2 is using
size-selected Aquadag standards (Acheson Inc. USA) and then correcting to a
calibration representative of ambient rBC by a constant factor of 0.75
(Laborde et al., 2012b).
However, few experiments since have independently verified this across
various soot types.</p>
      <p id="d1e488">To address the issues mentioned above, the Soot Aerodynamic Size Selection
for Optical properties (SASSO) project utilised the Aerodynamic Aerosol
Classifier (AAC) to classify particles according to aerodynamic diameter for
size and mass distribution measurements and optical evaluation
(Tavakoli et al., 2014). Specifically, SASSO has used the
AAC size selection of emissions from wood burning, diesel combustion and
secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation, prior to optical measurements
using cavity ring-down and photoacoustic spectroscopy with the EXtinction,
SCattering and Absorption of Light for AirBorne Aerosol Research
(EXSCALABAR) instrumentation, custom-built by the Met Office (Cotterell
et al., 2020, 2019a; Davies et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e492">The purpose of this paper is to determine the physical and chemical
properties of BC and organic aerosols from different combustion sources
representing the combustion of gas (methane), liquid (diesel) and solid
(wood) and to examine the variation in calibration SP2 constants for BC
particles generated by these combustion sources to enable accurate
characterisation of BC mass concentrations and mixing state in future
studies. The key objectives of this work are as follows:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e497">to develop reliable and repeatable methods of generating isolated BC and BrC
using controlled combustion sources and a smog chamber</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e501">to derive the dynamic shape factor of BC particles and material density for
organic aerosols</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e505">to determine mass spectral profiles of organic aerosols produced from wood
combustion from an aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS)</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e509">to explore the restructuring of BC particles in response to the controlled
coating and humidification of aerosol samples</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e513">to investigate the response of the SP2 incandescence signal to different types
of the BC particles.</p></list-item></list>
The optical data presented in this paper are limited to the qualitative
characterisation of the materials under investigation for the sake of
achieving objective (1). The quantitative parameterisation of the optical
properties of the particles and associated development and application of
ambient optical property models will be the subject of future publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental setup and methods</title>
      <p id="d1e525">Figure 1 shows our instrument configuration during SASSO. We used the AAC to
classify aerosols based on their aerodynamic size prior to characterising
the particle size distribution, chemical composition, aerosol mixing state
and optical properties for the AAC-selected aerosols. The Centrifugal
Particle Mass Analyzer (CPMA) and Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS)
sampled aerosols downstream of the AAC to measure the mass and mobility size
distributions of the AAC-selected particles. A Nafion humidifier and a
custom-designed thermal denuder (TD) were used for the BC restructuring
test.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e530">Schematic diagram of the experimental configuration for <bold>(a)</bold> wood
combustion; <bold>(b)</bold> SP2 incandescence signal calibration and BC morphology
investigation; <bold>(c)</bold> brown carbon formation and restructuring of BC. The
combinations of instruments described in (1), (2), (3) and (4) represent
different measurement configurations used to enable characterisation of
specific aerosol physiochemical parameters, as described in the main text.
The instrument set (1) was used for measurements of aerosol optical
properties (and thereby to enable the retrieval of refractive index for BC/BrC
aerosols, subject of a future publication) and organic chemical measurement
for wood combustion (setup a) and chamber (setup c) experiments;
instrument set (2) was used for dynamic shape factor measurements for BC and
material density measurement for organic aerosols (setup a and b); instrument set (3) was used for SP2 incandescence signal calibration (setup b); instrument set (4) was used for BC restructuring experiments
(setup c).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e548">The right panel in Fig. 1 shows the various instrument configurations used
in this study to target different measurements: instrument set (1) was used
for measurements of aerosol optical properties (and thereby to enable the
retrieval of refractive index for BC/BrC aerosols, subject of a future
publication) and organic chemical measurement for wood combustion (setup a) and chamber (setup c) experiments. Instrument set (2) was used for
dynamic shape factor measurements for BC and material density measurement
for organic aerosols (setup a and b). Instrument set (3) was used for
SP2 incandescence signal calibration (setup b). Instrument set (4) was
used for BC restructuring experiments (setup c).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Instrumentation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>Aerodynamic Aerosol Classifier (AAC)</title>
      <p id="d1e566">The AAC (Cambustion Ltd, Cambridge, UK) is used to select aerosols within a
narrow range of aerodynamic diameters and does not suffer from the issue of
multiple charges that affects selection using instruments such as the CPMA
and DMA. The AAC uses a centrifugal force and sheath flow between two
concentric rotating cylinders to produce an aerosol classified by
aerodynamic diameter. The detailed information regarding the principle of
AAC can be found in Tavakoli et al. (2014).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page16164?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>EXtinction, SCattering and Absorption of Light for AirBorne Aerosol Research (EXSCALABAR)</title>
      <p id="d1e578">The EXSCALABAR instrument used in this work was developed by the Met Office
(Exeter, UK), which can be operated in both the laboratory and from the UK
atmospheric research aircraft (FAAM BAe-146). The operating principle of
EXSCALABAR has been described in detail in previous papers (Davies et
al., 2018; Cotterell et al., 2020, 2019a, b). In brief, the instrument uses cavity ring-down spectroscopy
(CRDS) to measure the dry aerosol extinction at wavelengths of 405 and 658 nm
and photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS) to measure the dry aerosol absorption
coefficient at wavelengths of 405, 514 and 658 nm. For
deployment during SASSO, all cells shared common sample conditioning; the
aerosol sample relative humidity was reduced to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % by passing
through a Nafion dryer (Perma Pure LLC), and ozone and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were removed by an
activated charcoal “honeycomb” scrubber (custom-built in-house). The
sample passed through an impactor (Brechtel Manufacturing Inc., custom-built
for an 8 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> volumetric flow rate) with aerodynamic cut-off (D50)
of 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m before being drawn through a series of flow splitters that
evenly distributed the aerosol-laden air samples to the various optical
spectrometers, each operating at 1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For both the 405 and 658 nm wavelengths, the PAS cells were mounted downstream of the CRDS cells
(CRDS-PAS); i.e. the sample passed through the CRDS cell before entering the
PAS cell of the same wavelength. All other cells operated in a parallel flow
configuration. During the wood combustion experiments, a condensation
particle counter (CPC) (Model 3776, TSI, USA) was put in series after the
405 nm CRDS-PAS to measure the number concentration of particles
contributing to the extinction and absorption signal. For an additional
405 nm CRDS spectrometer, the aerosol sample passed through a HEPA filter
prior to sampling to provide a continuous measurement of the baseline and
highlight the presence of any gaseous absorbers affecting measurements at
that wavelength. CRDS and PAS measurements rely on characterisation of the
aerosol-free background. Before and after each wood combustion<?pagebreak page16165?> experiment
(run), sample flow was routed through a HEPA filter immediately after
EXSCALABAR's common sample inlet section to provide baseline measurements of
empty-cavity ring-down time and background photoacoustic response for all
CRDS and PAS spectrometers, respectively. During the Manchester chamber
experiments, the CPC was fitted in parallel with the sample lines, and
automated baseline measurements were made every 10 min. PAS cells with
improved sensitivity – as described by Cotterell et
al. (2019b) – were gradually implemented during 2019; only the 405 nm dry
absorption measurement used the new cells during the Wildfire lab wood
combustion experiments, but all cells were upgraded by the start of the
Manchester aerosol chamber experiments. The PAS cells were calibrated using
ozone before and after each set of experiments as well as at least every
working week during the experimental periods, as described by
Davies et al. (2018) and discussed further by
Cotterell et al. (2019a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>2.1.3</label><title>Single Particle Soot Photometer (SP2)</title>
      <p id="d1e640">The refractory black carbon (rBC) mass concentration was measured by a SP2
(Droplet Measurement Technologies, Colorado, USA). The SP2 uses the
laser-induced incandescence to measure the rBC mass and optical size of
individual BC particles with an intra-cavity Nd:YAG laser operating at 1064 nm. The particle size can be determined by detecting the laser signal
scattered by particles, with the scattering intensity maximum related to the
optical particle diameter through a calibration using polystyrene latex
spheres. The optical size of BC-containing particles is determined by
matching the measured scattering signal with calculations from light
scattering calculations assuming a core–shell structure (core–shell Mie
theory) (Moteki and Kondo, 2007). Because the scattering signal of
the absorbing particle will be distorted during its transit through the
laser beam due to the mass loss by laser heating, the leading edge
scattering signal before the onset of volatilisation is extrapolated to
reconstruct the scattering signal of the absorbing particles (Gao et al.,
2007; Liu et al., 2014). This calibration was performed at the start of the
measurement campaign. For those particles which contain absorbing materials
such as the refractory BC, they will absorb 1064 nm light and then heat up
and emit visible thermal radiation (incandesce). This incandescence signal
is directly proportional to the mass of rBC as determined by a calibration
(Liu et al., 2010) with generated BC
aerosols of known or independently measured mass. In the atmosphere, besides
BC, other materials (e.g. some metals and minerals) can incandesce at 1064 nm as well. However, as boiling-point temperatures of these materials are
rather different to that of black carbon, it is easy to distinguish them in
measurements made using the SP2 equipped with an additional narrowband
incandescence detector, such as the one used here
(Liu et al., 2018). Recently,
Sedlacek et al. (2018) demonstrated that charring of
light-absorbing organic particles at 1064 nm can produce the refractory
black carbon and then overestimate the rBC mass concentration; however this
does not affect pure BC particles, and we saw no evidence for an
incandescence signal associated with the pure organic particles measured in
this study. We investigated the effectiveness of this calibration from
different types of BC particles in this study and report the outcomes of
these investigations in Sect. 3.3.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>2.1.4</label><title>High-resolution aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-AMS)</title>
      <p id="d1e651">Non-refractory aerosol chemical compositions including sulfate, nitrate,
ammonium, chloride, and organics were measured by a HR-AMS in real time. The
HR-AMS was operated in fast mode to capture the fast transition of the
combustion phase during the wood combustion experiment
(Kimmel et al., 2011). The instrument operation and
data analysis of HR-AMS have been described in detail elsewhere (Alfarra et
al., 2006; Allan et al., 2003, 2004; DeCarlo et al., 2006). The ionisation
efficiency of the AMS was calibrated using monodisperse ammonium nitrate
particles according to the method described by Jayne et al. (2000) at various times during the experimental periods.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS5">
  <label>2.1.5</label><title>Centrifugal Particle Mass Analyzer (CPMA)</title>
      <p id="d1e663">The CPMA (Cambustion Ltd., Cambridge, UK) uses opposing electrical and
centrifugal fields to classify particles according to their mass-to-charge
ratio. The ability to vary the electrical field and rotation speed enables
particle selection based on their mass. The principles and operation of the
CPMA have been described elsewhere (Olfert and
Collings, 2005; Olfert et al., 2006). Combining the CPMA with a CPC (Model
3776, TSI, USA) and scanning across the mass range of interest provides the
bulk aerosol mass size distribution. As the CPMA uses an electrical
classification method to select particles, it also suffers from an issue of
multiple charging similar to a DMA, and it has problems associated with a
fraction of the uncharged particles that are also transmitted, particularly
at the lower rotation speeds. In this study, an electrical ioniser (MSP
Corp., USA) was used for wood combustion experiments, and a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr
radioactive ioniser was used for chamber experiments to neutralise particles
before they were sampled by the CPMA.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS6">
  <label>2.1.6</label><title>Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS)</title>
      <p id="d1e683">Aerosol size distributions in the diameter range from 14.9 to 673.2 nm were
measured by a commercial SMPS (TSI, USA, employing a model 3082 classifier
unit, 3081 DMA and 3786 CPC) with sheath and sample flow rates of 3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The DMA was operated in
scanning mode, with a scan time of 60 s and a retrace time of 4 s. The
particle size distribution was corrected for multiple charge effects and
diffusion loss using the standard inversion algorithm in the SMPS software
(AIM version 10).<?pagebreak page16166?> Before the experiment, the SMPS was calibrated using NIST-certified polystyrene latex spheres (PSLs, Thermo Fisher Inc.).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS7">
  <label>2.1.7</label><title>Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) sampling and analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e718">To investigate morphological properties, BC particles were collected on
carbon-coated copper grids using an electrostatic sampler (ESPnano, DASH
Inc., USA) (Miller et al., 2010) for transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) analysis. The grids were analysed using a FEI Titan
operated at 300 kV. Several areas of the grid were imaged to provide
representative images for each sample since both the grid film and particles
contained carbon.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS8">
  <label>2.1.8</label><title>Thermal denuder (TD)</title>
      <p id="d1e729">We explored the impacts of the partitioning of coating materials on the
structure of BC. For this BC restructuring experiment, a thermal denuder was
utilised to remove the coating materials on coated BC particles. The
home-built TD consisted of a stainless steel tube in a temperature-controlled furnace (Voliotis et al., 2021).
The TD had a length of 0.97 m and an internal diameter (i.d.) of 0.15 m.
Aerosols entered and exited the TD unit via a cylindrical 0.12 m long and
0.037 m i.d. stainless steel compartment. The temperature in the heating
section (0.51 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15 m i.d.) was controlled by four PID controllers
(Watlow EZ-ZONE) with additional temperature sensors on the outside of the
tube. It is necessary to ensure flow through the TD whenever it is heated,
even when bypassed, to allow for measurements of the unheated sample. A vacuum line
maintained 2.0–2.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> through whichever of the bypass or TD line
was not in use. The residence time of the air sample in the heating section
was 216–270 s. The TD was given 30 min for its temperature to stabilise
before sampling. The temperature of the TD was calibrated by measuring the
temperature at the axial centre of the denuder's heating zone. In this
study, the purpose of the TD is to remove as much of the organic coatings
from the combustion-generated particles as possible, rather than probing the
volatility properties of the coating. Therefore, all heating zones of the TD
were set to their maximum temperature of 180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. This upper
temperature is lower than that achieved by other commercial TD units and
minimises the risks of charring.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS9">
  <label>2.1.9</label><title>Nafion humidifier</title>
      <p id="d1e768">The multi-tube Nafion humidifier in the Manchester home-made Hygroscopicity
Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer (HTDMA) system was used for the BC
restructuring experiment. The principle and configuration of the HTDMA
system including the Nafion humidifier flow system can be found in
Good et al. (2010). The RH in the Nafion humidifier was
controlled by adjusting the relative mixing ratio of dry air from a
compressed air source with humidified air generated by bubbling compressed
air through a water-filled glass bulb.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS10">
  <label>2.1.10</label><title>The Manchester Aerosol Chamber</title>
      <p id="d1e779">The Manchester Aerosol Chamber comprises an 18 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collapsible
Fluorinated ethylene propylene Teflon bag (3 m (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 m (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 m (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)). It was used by  Alfarra et al. (2012) to investigate the effect of photochemical ageing and initial
precursor concentration on the composition and hygroscopic properties of
secondary organic aerosol. The chamber was run as a batch reactor in which
the composition of the gaseous precursors, oxidising environment, primary
emissions or seed particles, relative humidity and temperature were
controlled. Air was supplied to the chamber by a blower at a flow of 3 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The air was dried and filtered for gaseous impurities
and particles using a series of Purafil (Purafil Inc., USA), charcoal and
HEPA filters (Donaldson Filtration, USA) prior to humidification with
ultrapure deionised water. Halogen bulbs and two 6 kW Xenon arc lamps were
mounted on the inside of the enclosure housing the bag, which was coated
with a reflective space blanket (mylar) to maximise the irradiance in the
bag and to ensure even illumination. The Xenon arc lamps were mounted on two
opposite sides of the enclosure at different heights. The combination of
illumination was tuned and evaluated to mimic the atmospheric actinic
spectrum over the wavelength range 290–800 nm and had a maximum total
actinic flux of 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (photon s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
over the region 460–600 nm. The calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) value during the
reported experiments was 1.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (290–340 nm),
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (290–422 nm). The
relatively large volume of the chamber allows the dilute sample to be held
for several hours without significant aerosol removal from wall losses,
allowing for the study of particles introduced directly or formed within the
chamber over a period of several hours. The mean number and mass wall loss
rates of particles inside the chamber were estimated as 9.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3 and
8.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively
(Shao et al., 2021). Further details on the
chamber are given by Alfarra et al. (2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS11">
  <label>2.1.11</label><title>Diesel engine</title>
      <p id="d1e1054">The engine used in this study was a Volkswagen 1.9 L SDI light-duty diesel
engine (EURO 4 car equivalent), mounted on a test rig (CM12; Armfield Ltd.,
Hampshire, UK) and coupled to an eddy current dynamometer. This setup was
used for investigating the light absorption properties of black carbon
aerosol by Liu et al. (2017) previously. The engine throttle and
the load on the dynamometer were controlled with dedicated software. The
engine exhaust was passed through an oxidising catalytic converter (a
retrofitted diesel oxidation catalyst consisting of a mixture of platinum
and rhodium) followed by a standard Volkswagen silencer then a<?pagebreak page16167?> computer
operated pneumatic valve connected to the chamber, with 2 in. i.d. stainless
steel tubing between each component. The whole length of the exhaust line
was 4 m. The fuel used was standard UK low-sulfur diesel, obtained from a
local fuel station.</p>
      <p id="d1e1057">For each run, the engine was started and warmed up at 2000 rpm with 30 %
load. Once the engine reached a steady temperature (after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 min), a controlled amount of the exhaust was injected into the Manchester
Aerosol Chamber by switching the valve for a set time (this
condition is denoted as “hot engine”). For the cold-start runs (in which no throttle
or load was applied, denoted as “cold idle”), the exhaust sample was
injected within a minute of the engine starting.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS12">
  <label>2.1.12</label><title>Inverted flame burner</title>
      <p id="d1e1075">A miniature inverted soot generator (MISG; Argonaut Scientific) operated
with propane was used to generate black carbon aerosol. The design,
operation and performance of the MISG have been previously reported
(Kazemimanesh et al., 2019; Moallemi et al., 2019). The MISG was operated
under two conditions: with the flow rate of propane and air at 0.0625 and 10 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively (Condition 1) and 0.0625 and 7.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively (Condition 2). Under these
two conditions, the MISG produces black carbon with average elemental
carbon <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> total carbon of 95 %, determined via thermal-optical analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Derivation of aerosol dynamic shape factor and material density</title>
      <p id="d1e1118">In this study, the SMPS and CPMA were arranged downstream of the AAC to
measure the mobility diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the particles
within a narrow size range selected by the AAC based on their aerodynamic
diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These parameters enabled the dynamic shape factor
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the BC particles to be derived by using Eq. (1) under
the assumption that the density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of pure BC is 1.8 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> DeCarlo et al., 2004),
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M68" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ve</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ve</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          in which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Cunningham slip correction factor for a particle of
diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> using the parameters specified by Kim et al. (2005), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ve</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume equivalent diameter, which can be calculated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
using Eq. (2).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M73" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ve</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can also be determined by using the specified <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
combination with the SMPS-measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Specifically, we can calculate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ve</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for an initial value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trial</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using Eq . (3):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M80" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ve</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ve</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          in which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference density (1 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). This value
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ve</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is then substituted into Eq. (1) to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. We
then iterate through a range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trial</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trial</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> converge. The equations were solved iteratively using
Brent's standard method solver (“findroots” command, Igor Pro version 6.36,
Wavemetrics).</p>
      <p id="d1e1515">In addition, the material density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of organic aerosols can be
calculated from Eqs. (4) and (5) by assuming the organic particles are
spherical (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Adachi et
al., 2019).

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M90" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ve</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ve</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>when</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Experimental methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Wood combustion experiment</title>
      <p id="d1e1634">Our wood combustion experiments were designed to expand on the studies
reported by Haslett et al. (2018) to produce
repeatable combustion events with discernible transitions between the three
burning phases of pyrolysis, flaming and smouldering combustion.
Haslett et al. (2018) used the FM Global Fire
Propagation Apparatus (FPA) (FTT, East Grinstead, UK) as their controlled
ignition source, while we used the iCone Calorimeter (Fire Testing
Technology, FTT, East Grinstead, UK), located in the wildFIRE laboratory at
the University of Exeter (Fig. 1a). The main difference between the FPA
and iCone approaches is that the there is a forced flow of air from beneath
the sample in the FPA, whereas in the iCone the sample sits in ambient air
conditions. Otherwise, both approaches rely on oxygen consumption
calorimetry to measure the heat release rate from a burning object.</p>
      <p id="d1e1637">The aim of the wood combustion experiments was to produce different phases
of combustion that were as well separated as possible, rather than under
natural burning conditions. This allowed the aerosol emissions from
different burn phases, pyrolysis, flaming and smouldering, to be analysed
separately. Three core wood types were selected for all the experiments
which we hypothesised would produce different burn conditions, i.e.
different durations of pyrolysis, flaming and smouldering. These wood types
were <italic>Sequioadendron giganteum</italic> (Giant Redwood), <italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic> (Scots pine) and <italic>Populus nigra</italic> (poplar), with bulk densities of
0.45, 0.51 and 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively. The Giant
Redwood and Scots pine are gymnosperm “softwoods”, with the former
considered to have low density and the latter a high density, while the
poplar is a low-density angiosperm “hardwood” species. In addition, we also
sampled combustion emissions from <italic>Thuja plicata</italic> (Western red cedar) with a bulk density
of 0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both Scots pine and Western red cedar
are resin-rich, while the Giant Redwood contains<?pagebreak page16168?> less resin, and the poplar
contains barely any resinous compounds. Hence, all should be capable of
producing different volumes and types of aerosol particles. There are many
factors that can influence composition and properties of generated aerosols
during combustion, such as the wood resin content and moisture content,
which would result in a highly extensive variable set. In the work presented
here, we only focus on the influence of water content of wood samples on the
physical and chemical properties of the particles from wood combustion. We
assessed wood of two different levels of fuel moisture: fully oven-dried samples and
moist samples with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 % moisture content.</p>
      <p id="d1e1716">During the experiment, a wood sample (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mm): <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was first placed into a custom-made stainless steel basket
and then exposed to a radiant heat flux of 40 kW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> using the
iCone Calorimeter. This radiant heating thermally decomposes the wood sample
and generates volatile gases (pyrolysate) as the wood begins to pyrolyse. A
continuously operated spark igniter that was positioned in the released
stream of pyrolysate acted as a source of ignition. Immediately following
the initial placement of the wood sample under the radiant heat source,
pyrolysate was continuously released, and the pyrolysate concentration
immediately above the wood sample and in the vicinity of the spark igniter
increased also. The sample ignited once this pyrolysate reached sufficient
concentrations and was well mixed with the surrounding air, at which point
the igniter was switched off and removed from the air flow. Measurements
were taken as soon as a sample was exposed to the radiant heat flux. Each
sample was allowed to flame for 5 min and the aerosols captured from
this phase, and then the flames were snuffed out manually leaving the fuel
smouldering so that separate measurements of the smouldering phase could be
taken alone for a further 5 min.</p>
      <p id="d1e1763">Throughout the experiment, the exhaust emissions from combustion were
collected in a hood and entered into an exhaust duct. The concentration of
oxygen, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide in the exhaust gas was measured
by gas analysers integrated into the iCone system and used to calculate the
heat release rate from the burning fuel. We installed an outshoot on this
duct to allow part of the exhaust to be carried to a separate sampling
system that allowed for the measurement of the aerosol properties in the
exhaust. Thus monitoring could occur in real time by the instruments
(described above and shown in Fig. 1), after the exhaust was diluted with
the compressed air through a set of Dekati DI-1000 ejector diluters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>SP2 incandescence signal calibration and BC morphology investigation experiment</title>
      <p id="d1e1774">For the purposes of SP2 incandescence signal calibration and morphology
investigation of BC particles, three types of the BC particles other than
those emitted from wood combustion were investigated through chamber
experiments (Fig. 1b). For the BC particles generated by the MISG, BC
particles were introduced into the chamber through a Dekati DI-1000 ejector
diluter. For the BC particles from the Aquadag standards, the Aquadag
standard was first generated by an aerosol atomiser (Topas ATM 226) and
then passed through a diffusion dryer (using silica desiccant) prior to
entering the chamber. For the BC particles emitted from the engine, a hot
engine running condition (2000 r.p.m., 30 % load and 10 min warm-up) and
a cold idle condition were investigated. After the BC mass concentration had
accumulated to adequate levels in the chamber, a catalytic stripper
(operated at 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Model CS10, Catalytic Instruments, Germany)
was used to remove the coatings on the BC particles before they were sampled
by the instruments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>2.3.3</label><title>SOA formation through chamber experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e1794">For the purpose of testing models of BC and SOA mixing during the SASSO
project, two procedures for generating SOA were used: one that yielded
non-absorbing SOA and one that produced brown carbon. Experiments were
conducted in the photochemical aerosol reaction chamber at the University of
Manchester. During the experiment, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (10 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a balance gas
of high-purity N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (BOC, UK)) was injected directly into the bag from a
custom-made gas cylinder via stainless steel tubing, and its concentration
was measured using a chemiluminescence gas analyser (Model 42i, Thermo
Scientific, MA, USA). After the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in the bag reached the
desired value, the precursor volatile organic compound (VOC) was injected into a heated glass bulb
(80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and flushed into the bag with high-purity nitrogen.
Subsequently, chamber lights were turned on to trigger SOA formation. The
EXSCALABAR system was used to determine the light absorption properties of
the formed SOA particles in real time throughout the experiment.</p>
      <p id="d1e1845">In this study, 50 ppb NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 250 ppb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene (Sigma-Aldrich)
was used to form non-absorbing SOA; this route to forming non-absorbing SOA
is well characterised and has been reported previously
(Nakayama et al., 2010). Here, we only focus on the
methodology used to produce the brown carbon SOA. Previous work has reported
“brown” SOA formation through oxidation of aromatic precursors under high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions (Laskin et al., 2015). In this study, we
injected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 ppb cresol (Sigma-Aldrich) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 ppb NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 ppb NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the chamber) into the
chamber and removed the UV filter from one of the Xenon arc lamps to
increase photochemistry and accelerate and enhance the “brown” SOA
formation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4">
  <label>2.3.4</label><title>BC restructuring experiment</title>
      <p id="d1e1921">For the purpose of testing the influence of organic coatings and relative
humidity on the structure of the BC particles, a series of experiments were
conducted in this study. First, bare BC particles with minimal accompanying
VOCs were<?pagebreak page16169?> injected into the chamber by using an oxidising catalytic
converter, heated ejector dilutors, a catalytic stripper, Purafil, and
activated charcoal denuders between the exhaust line of the engine and the
chamber inlet. After the BC reached the desired concentration, BC injection
was stopped. The particle size distribution of the dried bare BC particles
was scanned by the AAC. In addition, the particle size distribution of the
dried bare BC particles following “humidity cycling”, i.e. exposure to
90 % RH for around 10 s and then dehydration to 10 % RH, was measured by
AAC for comparison. Afterwards, we injected 50 ppb NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 250 ppb
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene into the chamber. Photochemical reaction was initiated by
turning the chamber lights on, and organic materials condensed onto the BC
particles. After the condensed organics equilibrate with the surrounding
VOCs and the particles stabilised at a certain size (295 nm in aerodynamic
size), the aerodynamic particle size distribution of the dried organic-coated BC particles, and that of the dried organic-coated BC particles
experienced the humidity cycling, was measured by AAC. Hereafter, a thermal
denuder operated at 180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C was added, and the organic coatings of
the coated BC particles, that had either experienced the humidity cycling
process or not, were removed by the TD, and then the size distribution of
the BC core was measured by the AAC and SMPS.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Evolution of BC and organics through wood combustion process</title>
      <p id="d1e1966">Figure 2 shows an example time series of the rBC and organic aerosol (OA)
emitted during combustion for a representative wood sample. Throughout the
wood combustion experiment, noticeable changes in BC and OA concentrations
in the exhaust gases were observed. Following exposure of a wood sample to
the heat flux of the iCone and prior to ignition, a clear signal
corresponding to the production of organic aerosols was observed. For these
<italic>pyrolysis-phase</italic> aerosols, the ratio of the OA mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, measured by the AMS) to the
sum of masses attributed to OA and rBC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, measured by SP2,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rBC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0,
implying that aerosols produced during the pyrolysis phase of combustion were composed
dominantly of organic species. This organic material must be due to the
early stages of pyrolysis where compounds of cellulose and hemicellulose
within the wood are being broken down during its thermal decomposition and
the surface of the wood begins to char. We suggest that these pyrolysis-phase aerosols are formed from the condensation of volatile gases into the
condensed phase as the aerosol plume lofts upwards away from the heat source
of the iCone and into the cooler environment of the exhaust system.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2039">Example of the phase transitions between different burn phases of
dry Giant Redwood: <bold>(a)</bold> number concentration of black carbon and the
scattering particles detected from SP2; <bold>(b)</bold> mass concentration of rBC and
organics measured by SP2 and AMS, respectively; and <bold>(c)</bold> mass ratio of
organic aerosol to total aerosol.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2057">Immediately after ignition, the number (and mass) concentration of the OA
decreased abruptly, while the rBC mass concentration increased sharply to
150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2). We refer to this combustion phase
following ignition as the <italic>flaming phase</italic>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the onset of flaming combustion
(the first 90 s after ignition) is less than 0.05, indicating that most of
the emitted aerosols during this period are BC. As flaming combustion
progressed, the extent and depth of charring increased, and as the flammable
gas flux slows, the flame begins to diminish. Char is a strong insulator, and
hence the char layer forms an obstacle to the conduction of heat into the
lower uncharred layers of wood, reducing the production rate of the
flammable gases and decreasing the rate of heat release from combustion. As
flaming subsides, the number (and mass) concentration of BC particles
decreases (Fig. 2), and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased to around 0.2 after 300 s
after the ignition.</p>
      <p id="d1e2106">After <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 s (5 min) from the time of ignition, the flames
were snuffed manually to force the combustion from the flaming to the
smouldering phase, thus transitioning the oxidation reaction from that on
gas-phase species to direct oxidation of the solid fuel. Figure 2 shows that
the number (and mass) concentration of rBC in the <italic>smouldering phase</italic> decreased abruptly as
flaming combustion ceased, and the OA concentration increased sharply. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 1.0 during this period, indicating that almost all the emitted
aerosols are composed of organic species only.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Brown carbon formation</title>
      <p id="d1e2138">As shown in Fig. 3, after the precursors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 ppb cresol and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 ppb NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were introduced into the chamber and the
lights were switched on, the SOA started to form, and the particle size
increased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 nm after 40 min. Over this same time
period, we measured increasing aerosol absorption and extinction
coefficients; the single scattering albedo (SSA) was observed to increase
sharply at the onset of the SOA formation and then stabilised at around 0.81
(at 405 nm) eventually. Most of the evolution in SSA (i.e. increasing over
time) is expected to be caused by the increase in particle size over a size
range where SSA is very sensitive to particle size. We emphasise that we did
not inject any primary ozone in this experiment, and the abrupt increase in
apparent ozone concentration around the time of VOC injection is likely
caused by the cresol (as an aromatic compound) causing optical interference
in the ozone instrument.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2176">Formation and evolution of the brown carbon with the precursor of
cresol and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the chamber.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>SP2 incandescence signal calibration with different types of BC particles</title>
      <?pagebreak page16171?><p id="d1e2201">The most common way to calibrate the incandescence channel of SP2 is using
monodisperse Aquadag standards (Acheson Inc. USA), which are then corrected
for ambient rBC by applying a constant factor of 0.75 based on a previous
laboratory comparison (Laborde
et al., 2012b). As the incandescence signal is not independent for the
different types of BC particles, using a constant factor of 0.75 may
represent an uncertainty in the retrieved BC mass concentration. Thus,
quantifying the correction factor for many types of BC particles found
commonly in the atmosphere may enable better constraints to be placed on
this factor depending on the BC source being sampled, thus improving the
accuracy of future SP2 measurements of rBC mass concentrations. The broad
range of BC aerosols generated in this study from different combustion
sources served as an ideal platform to assess the variation in this
correction factor to SP2-derived rBC mass.</p>
      <p id="d1e2204">In this study, the incandescence signal of the SP2 was measured for BC
particles from catalytically stripped diesel engine exhaust emissions, an
inverted flame burner and controlled flaming wood combustion, respectively,
and compared with that measured from an Aquadag standard. The uncertainties
here refer to precision of the fitted parameters reported by the Igor Pro
fitting algorithm, based on analysis of residual data. As shown in Fig. 4,
for the BC particles emitted from the diesel engine under hot engine and
cold idle conditions (Fig. 4a), the slopes of the incandescence signal
with BC mass are 0.821 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.002 and 0.794 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.005 times of that
measured from the Aquadag standard, respectively. Note that while some
deviation from a perfect linear response is noted, this is small compared to
the variation in slopes, so it represents a minor source of uncertainty in
comparison. These correction factors are 9.4 % and 5.6 % different, with
the common value of 0.75 (with the uncertainty less than 5 %) recommended
by Laborde et al. (2012b) when
deriving the mass concentration of BC emitted from diesel engines. For the
BC particles generated from the flame burner (Fig. 4b), the correction
factor is 0.879 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003. Meanwhile, for the BC particles emitted from
the flaming phase during the combustion of Scots pine, poplar, Giant Redwood
or Western red cedar, the correction factors are 0.913 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.009, 0.906 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.014, 0.889 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.027 or 0.843 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.028, respectively. We
stress that, for the SP2 calibrations here from wood combustion emissions,
the BC particles were not treated with a catalytic stripper before sampling
by the SP2. While coating materials may char under 1064 nm to produce
refractory black carbon and therefore cause overestimates in the
incandescence signal (Sedlacek et al., 2018), as shown in
Fig. 2c, the BC particles generated at the beginning of the flaming phase
contained almost no organic species, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values less than 0.05.
Even if this organic carbon (OC) were to be converted to elemental carbon (EC) with 100 % efficiency (which we
consider to be highly unlikely), this would represent a very small error.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2270">The incandescence signal of the SP2 as a function of the rBC mass.
BC particles were selected by the CPMA from <bold>(a)</bold> engine emission, <bold>(b)</bold> burner
emission or <bold>(c)</bold> wood combustion emission.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2289">The differences in the correction factors derived in this study with the
default value of 0.75 are 9.4 % (5.6 %), 17.2 % and 12.4 %–21.7 % for
the BC particles emitted from an engine with hot engine (or cold idle)
condition, a flame burner and wood combustion, respectively. We recommend that
future studies utilising the SP2 for rBC mass concentration measurements use
SP2 calibrations with the same type of BC as that to be studied.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2294">Physical properties of monodisperse (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) black carbon
(flaming phase) and organic particles (smouldering phase) emitted from wood
combustion: <bold>(a)</bold> mass distribution measured by CPMA; <bold>(b)</bold> particle number
distribution measured by the SMPS after the CPMA selected particles at the
mass peak of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm particle mass distribution presented in <bold>(a)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2344">Mobility size distribution of monodisperse (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) black
carbon (flaming phase) and organic particles (smouldering phase) emitted
from the combustion of the wet wood samples.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2371">Effective density and dynamic shape factor of organic and black
carbon aerosols from wood combustion.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Flaming phase_BC </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Smouldering phase_Org </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oven-dried</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Oven-dried</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Wet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scots pine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poplar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Giant Redwood</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2374"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The BC density of 1.8 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was applied.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Assuming organic aerosol is spherical with the shape factor of 1.00.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Physical properties of black carbon and organic aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e2724">The morphology of BC particles changes markedly during atmospheric ageing,
with associated impacts on the particle size and optical properties (Zeng
et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2008; Teoh et al., 2019). In this study, the
dynamic shape factor of BC particles and the material density of organic
aerosols were derived by measuring the mass and/or mobility diameter of
AAC-selected particles. For biomass burning aerosols generated through our
controlled combustion of dry wood samples, the AAC was set to pass aerosols
with an aerodynamic diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm, and we sampled BC or organic
aerosols produced from the flaming or smouldering phases, respectively.
Number concentration measurements from the CPC were recorded as the CPMA was
scanned to determine the aerosol mass distribution. Figure 5a shows that
there are considerable differences in the mass distributions for the
produced BC (during the flaming phase) and organic aerosols (during the
smouldering phase). The peak mass of BC particles produced from the wood
samples of the Scots pine, poplar and Giant Redwood is 10.86, 12.47 and
7.00 fg, respectively. Meanwhile, the corresponding peak mass for the
organic aerosols is 1.72, 1.74 and 1.90 fg, respectively. This difference
is likely due to the difference in density and morphology for BC and organic
aerosols. BC normally has a large density and a more irregular morphology
than organic aerosols. After the peak masses for the AAC-selected aerosols
were ascertained, the CPMA was set to these values to further select the
AAC-selected aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) by their peak mass for a subsequent
mobility size measurement using our SMPS. Figure 5b shows that the
corresponding peak mobility size of the BC and organic particles after
selection according to their peak mass is 394, 405 and 292 nm and 139,
139 and 140 nm for Scots pine, poplar and Giant Redwood, respectively. From
these aforementioned peak mobility diameters and aerosol masses, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the BC particles and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the organics can
be calculated from the methods described in Sect. 2.2. We highlight the
discussion in Sect. 2.2 that stated that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> could be calculated using
either the aerodynamic or volume-equivalent diameter; as organic species may
evaporate during the AAC selection (due to the high sheath flow rate) and
thus bias the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, only the mass and mobility size distributions were
used in these calculations. Table 1 summarises the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
inferred for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm BC particles, with values of 2.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04, 2.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 and 1.80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 ascertained for oven-dried
samples of Scots pine, poplar and Giant Redwood, respectively. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the organics is 1.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01, 1.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 and 1.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for oven-dried samples of Scots pine, poplar and
Giant Redwood, respectively. For combustion experiments using wet wood
samples (with moisture contents around 25 %), the CPMA instrument was
unavailable. Instead, the mobility size distributions for the AAC-selected
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm BC particles or organic particles were measured by the SMPS
immediately after AAC selection. As shown in Fig. 6, the peak mobility size
of the BC and organic particles is 296, 256 and 161 nm and 149, 142 and 137 nm
for Scots pine, poplar and Giant Redwood, respectively. Based on their
aerodynamic and mobility size, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the BC particles and
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the organics were calculated and are summarised in Table 1.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm BC particles is 1.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03, 1.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 and 1.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 for Scots pine, poplar and
Giant Redwood, respectively, lower than that of the dry wood samples. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the organics is 1.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02, 1.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 and
1.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Scots pine, poplar and Giant Redwood,
respectively, higher than that of the dry wood samples. This result implies
that the water contents of wood samples are important in determining the
physical properties of emitted particles from their combustion, in addition
to any influence on the pre-ignition pyrolysis phase. The densities of
organic aerosols reported/used in previous studies vary significantly, from
0.6 to 1.4 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Turpin and Lim, 2001; Nakao et al., 2013; Li et
al., 2016). For the biomass burning aerosols, Zhai
et al. (2017) reported the effective density ranged from 1.35 to 1.51 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the carbonaceous aerosol produced from the agricultural
residue<?pagebreak page16173?> burning. Our results would expand the available data on the
variation densities for organic aerosols from the wood combustion.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3031">Relationship of <bold>(a)</bold> mobility size with aerodynamic size and <bold>(b)</bold> shape factor with aerodynamic size, of BC particles from Aquadag standard
atomisation, diesel engine and flame burner emission; TEM images of BC
particles emitted from <bold>(c)</bold> a diesel engine (hot engine condition) and <bold>(d)</bold> a flame burner (condition 1). The error bar in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> is too small to see
clearly.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3059">For the BC particles from the catalytically stripped Aquadag standard,
diesel engine exhaust and an inverted flame burner, particles were first
selected by the AAC prior to mobility size distribution measurements using
the SMPS. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the BC particles was derived from the
controlled aerodynamic size and the measured peak mobility diameter. Figure 7a shows that the particle mobility diameter increases with the selected
aerodynamic size for all three types of BC particles, while Fig. 7b shows
the corresponding variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. These figures demonstrate clearly
that the dynamic shape factor varies with both the aerosol aerodynamic size
and with the BC source. For the BC particles generated from the Aquadag
standard, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increased sharply from 1.315 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.004 to
1.460 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003 as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased from 75 to 125 nm but then
decreased with further increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to a value of 1.255 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.005
at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm. This result implies that the formed BC particles are
more irregular as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases initially, but particles adopt more
collapsed morphologies as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases further. These trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
likely arise from the coagulation of the primary BC particles, which drives
the fractal-like morphology for small BC particles and relative compact
shape for large particles. For BC particles generated from the diesel
engine, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits a monotonically decreasing trend with
particle size over the reduced size range probed for this BC source, with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreasing from 1.329 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.243</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">275</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm. The TEM images (Fig. 7c) show that the
primary spherules generated directly from the diesel engine are around 20 nm. As the BC particles selected in the experiment are much larger than the
primary spherules, the coagulation process drives the large particles
towards more compacted morphologies than the small particles, and this leads
to the decreasing trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with particle size. For the BC particles
generated from the flame burner, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with
particle size for both operating conditions, and a maximum value was reached
of 2.731 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.021 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm. The same increasing trend
was reported by Slowik et al. (2004) previously, who
reported an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0 when the mobility size increased from 100 to 300 nm
for the BC particles generated with a lower propane <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio compared to
the measurements we report here. The TEM images (Fig. 7d) show that,
similar to the BC particles emitted from diesel engine, the primary
spherules generated from the flame burner are also around 20 nm. As our
experiments on BC particles from the flame burner selected particles at
small sizes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50–150 nm), the increase
of the dynamic shape factor with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is probably due to the<?pagebreak page16174?> coagulation
of primary generated particles. In addition, by comparing Fig. 7c and d (more images are shown in Fig. S1), it is clear that the large BC
particles generated from the flame burner tend towards aggregate morphology,
in contrast to the compact morphology of the large BC particles emitted from
the diesel engine (Fig. 9c). This leads to the flame-burner-generated BC
particles exhibiting larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> than those from the diesel engine.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3350">Number size distribution of the bare BC (black line) and organic-coated BC particles (green line) before and after they experience “humidity
cycling” (i.e. exposed to 90 % RH around 10 s and then dehydrated to
10 % RH) process. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the aerodynamic diameter.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3372">Number size distribution of the <bold>(a)</bold> organic-coated BC after passing
through the thermal denuder to remove coatings and <bold>(b)</bold> organic-coated BC
after experiencing the “humidity cycling” process and then passing through
the thermal denuder to remove coatings.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>BC restructuring</title>
      <?pagebreak page16175?><p id="d1e3395">Recent work has shown that soot particles maintain their structure after
coating with SOA and subsequent thermal denuding (Bhandari et al.,
2017) but will restructure in response to humidification
(Leung et al., 2017). We performed a series of
experiments to better understand this restructuring. As shown in Fig. 8,
there is no clear change in the measured particle aerodynamic diameter for
the bare BC after they experience the humidity cycling process, implying
that the bare BC particles retain their structure, even after they experience
very large perturbations in RH; this result is similar to that reported by
Bhandari et al. (2019). In addition, no size change of
the organic-coated BC particles was observed after they experienced the
humidity cycling process either. Based on these results, we cannot form
conclusions on whether the BC core was restructured during the humidity
cycling process. There are two possibilities: (1) the BC cores retained
their structure throughout the humidity cycling process; or (2) as shown in
Fig. 8, the coatings on BC particles are very thick and therefore dominate
the particle, rendering our size measurement approach insensitive to any
changes in BC core size from restructuring. The size of the bare BC
particles is around 68 nm, but after coating by SOA, the size of the coated
BC particles reaches up to around 300 nm. Due to the very large coating
thicknesses of the coated BC particles, even if the BC cores were
restructured during the humidity cycling process, any changes were not
reflected in the overall particle size as this was dominated by the
contribution from the coating organics. To further examine these
possibilities, the organic coatings of the coated BC particles, that had
either experienced the humidity cycling process or not, were removed by the
TD, and then the size distribution of the BC core was measured by the AAC
and SMPS. As shown in Fig. 9, a clear difference in BC core size was
observed between the organic-coated BC particles that had passed immediately
through the TD (Fig. 9a) and those that had first experienced the humidity
cycling process (Fig. 9b). The mobility diameter of the BC core size
peaked at 79.3 nm for the former case but peaked at 23.6 nm for the latter
one, implying that the BC core was restructured (becomes more compact) after
coating with organics and then experiencing the high-humidity environment.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e3400">Mass spectra of organic aerosols (OA) presented as a percentage of
total OA produced during <bold>(a)</bold> the pyrolysis phase and <bold>(b)</bold> the smouldering phase; and
<bold>(c)</bold> the difference between them, for the dry wood samples.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>AMS mass spectra of organic aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e3427">Owing to the complex nature of biomass combustion in the natural
environment, and the high sensitivity to the combustion environment, the
organic mass spectral signatures from previous AMS experiments vary
considerably. This variability makes it difficult to estimate the
contribution of biomass burning aerosol (BBA) to total PM through positive
matrix factorisation (PMF) methods (Paglione et al., 2020). The mass
spectra for the BBA generated from our repeatable and controlled laboratory
experiments have the potential to tighten constraints on the AMS spectral
signature(s) for BBA. Highly controlled and reproducible measurements of
aerosol emissions from combustion of a common African biofuel source have
been achieved and reported by Haslett et al. (2018) previously. Here, we expand detail of the mass spectra observations
reported by Haslett et al. (2018) by
providing data sets on the combustion for different types of biomass to that
studied in previous work.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e3432">Mass spectra of organic aerosols (OA) presented as a percentage of
total OA produced during <bold>(a)</bold> the pyrolysis phase and <bold>(b)</bold> the smouldering phase; and
<bold>(c)</bold> the difference between them, for the wet wood samples.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16161/2021/acp-21-16161-2021-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3450"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The mass spectra of organic aerosols generated from the pyrolysis and
smouldering phases (noise to signal ratio is less than 0.005), and the
difference mass spectra between these two phases, are shown in Figs. 10 and
11 for the combustion of dry and wet wood samples, respectively. For
all experiments, irrespective of the wood type and moisture content, the
spectra for the pyrolysis and smouldering phases are dominated by
hydrocarbon ion fragments, including C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 55),
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 43, 57), C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 91). These peaks are associated with
fragments of saturated alkenes, alkanes, cycloalkanes and aromatic
compounds, respectively. Our results are similar to the mass spectra
reported by Haslett et al. (2018) for the
controlled combustion of biomass in the laboratory. By comparing Figs. 10 and
11, no clear difference in mass spectra of the organic aerosol<?pagebreak page16177?>s in
individual burn phases (pyrolysis or smouldering phase) with the moisture
content of the wood samples is observed. This implies that the effect
moisture has on the organic chemical profile of wood burning emissions is
through changing the durations of the different phases of the burn cycle,
not through the chemical modification of the individual phases. This is in
stark contrast to the dominant role of the wood water content in determining
the morphological parameters and densities of generated biomass burning
aerosols shown in Sect. 3.2.</p>
      <p id="d1e3626">The peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 57, 60 and 73 are seen together in both combustion phases;
these peaks are often used as markers for biomass burning organic aerosols
(Alfarra et al., 2007), as very few other aerosol
sources in the natural environment can contribute to these peaks.
Interestingly, for the wood<?pagebreak page16178?> samples of Scots pine, Giant Redwood and Western
red cedar, these peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 57, 60 and 73 were more dominant in the
smouldering phase. This is a similar observation to that reported by
Haslett et al. (2018). However, for the
poplar wood sample, the peaks are most dominant in the pyrolysis phase. This
is particularly interesting because it suggests that the combustion of
angiosperm wood (poplar) and gymnosperm wood (Scots pine, Giant Redwood and
Western red cedar) will emit different chemical species depending on the
combustion phase. This difference may be due to the resin content and
composition (which is related to chemical volatility) within the wood.
Future work should consider the impact of the burning of different wood types
and their respective relationship to combustion phase.</p>
      <p id="d1e3653">For all wood samples, the peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44, which is mainly attributed to the
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragment with a possible contribution from
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, is more prominent in the pyrolysis phase than the
smouldering phase, which is in contrast with the results from
Haslett et al. (2018). This could be a result
of the different wood types. We note that the study of Haslett et al. (2018) used rubber wood (<italic>Hevea brasiliensis</italic>), that produces latex sap. This hard tropical wood
also has a bulk density much higher than the woods tested here (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and likely a higher lignin content, where lignin is one
the last compounds to be broken down by the combustion process.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3747">During the Soot Aerodynamic Size Selection for Optical properties (SASSO)
project and a EUROCHAMP transnational access project, the physical and
chemical properties of black carbon and organic matter from different
combustion sources were investigated. For BC particles from the diesel
engine and flame burner emissions, the TEM images show that the primary
spherules size are similar, around 20 nm. As particle size increases, BC
particles adopted more collapsed/compacted morphologies from the diesel
engine but tend to more aggregated morphologies from the flame burner
source. For the particles emitted from the wood combustion, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
BC particles and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of organics were observed to range from
1.8–2.17 and 1.22–1.32 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for dry wood samples and 1.2–1.85 and
1.44–1.60 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for wet wood samples. No clear difference in the AMS
mass spectra of the organic aerosols in individual burn phases (pyrolysis or
smouldering phase) with the moisture content of the wood samples was
observed. This implies that the effect moisture has on the organic chemical
profile of wood burning emissions is through changing the durations of the
different phases of the burn cycle, not through the chemical modification of
the individual phases. In addition, the incandescence signal of SP2 was
calibrated with the different types of BC particles generated in our study
and compared with the Aquadag standard. The correction factor, which is
used for converting the incandescence signal from the Aquadag standard to
the investigated BC, was measured as 0.821 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.002 (or 0.794 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.005), 0.879 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003 and 0.843 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.028 to 0.913 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.009
for the BC particles emitted from engine under the hot running (or cold idle)
condition, flame burner and wood combustion, respectively. These values are
9.4 % (5.6 %), 17.2 % and 12.4 %–21.7 % different, with the default
value of 0.75 used recently. Quantifying the correction factor for many
types of BC particles found commonly in the atmosphere may enable better
constraints to be placed on this factor depending on the BC source being
sampled and thus improve the accuracy of future SP2 measurements of rBC
mass concentrations.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3833">Processed data are available at <uri>https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15172572.v1</uri> (Hu, 2021). Raw data are archived at
the University of Manchester and are available on request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3839">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16161-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16161-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3848">JDA, DH, MRA, DL, JMH and HC designed research;
DH, CY, MRA, KS, JML, MIC, CB, IR and ZL performed wood
combustion experiments; DH, MRA, YS, MD and AV performed Manchester
aerosol chamber experiments; BS, PL and GS performed the burner
experiments. DH conducted the data analysis and wrote the manuscript with
inputs from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3854">Some authors are members of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors have also no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e3863">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3869">This article is part of the special issue “Simulation chambers as tools in atmospheric research (AMT/ACP/GMD inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3875">Thanks are expressed to Catalytic Instruments for the loan of the catalytic stripper CS10
and to Xiaomei Du at National Research Council Canada for the TEM images.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3880">This work was supported by the UK Natural Environment Research Council
(NERC) (grant no. NE/S00212X/1) and the Met Office and received
transnational activity funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020
research and innovation<?pagebreak page16179?> programme through the EUROCHAMP-2020 Infrastructure
Activity (grant no. 730997). Prem Lobo was supported by the UK
National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS) Visiting Scientist Programme.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3886">This paper was edited by Stefania Gilardoni and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Adachi, K., Sedlacek, A. J., Kleinman, L., Springston, S. R., Wang, J.,
Chand, D., Hubbe, J. M., Shilling, J. E., Onasch, T. B., Kinase, T., Sakata,
K., Takahashi, Y., and Buseck, P. R.: Spherical tarball particles form
through rapid chemical and physical changes of organic matter in
biomass-burning smoke, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 19336–19341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900129116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1900129116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alfarra, M. R., Paulsen, D., Gysel, M., Garforth, A. A., Dommen, J., Prévôt, A. S. H., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Coe, H.: A mass spectrometric study of secondary organic aerosols formed from the photooxidation of anthropogenic and biogenic precursors in a reaction chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5279–5293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5279-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-5279-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Sandradewi, J., Weimer, S.,
Lanz, V. A., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., and Baltensperger, U.: Identification
of the Mass Spectral Signature of Organic Aerosols from Wood Burning
Emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5770–5777, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es062289b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es062289b</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alfarra, M. R., Hamilton, J. F., Wyche, K. P., Good, N., Ward, M. W., Carr, T., Barley, M. H., Monks, P. S., Jenkin, M. E., Lewis, A. C., and McFiggans, G. B.: The effect of photochemical ageing and initial precursor concentration on the composition and hygroscopic properties of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6417–6436, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6417-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6417-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Allan, J. D., Jimenez, J. L., Williams, P. I., Alfarra, M. R., Bower, K. N., Jayne, J. T., Coe, H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer – 1. Techniques of data interpretation and error analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002358" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd002358</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Allan, J. D., Delia, A. E., Coe, H., Bower, K. N., Alfarra, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Middlebrook, A. M., Drewnick, F., Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: A generalised method for the extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer data, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 909–922, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Crutzen, P. J.: Atmospheric Aerosols: Biogeochemical
Sources and Role in Atmospheric Chemistry, Science, 276, 1052–1058,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5315.1052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.276.5315.1052</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bhandari, J., China, S., Onasch, T., Wolff, L., Lambe, A., Davidovits, P., Cross, E., Ahern, A., Olfert, J., Dubey, M., and Mazzoleni, C.: Effect of Thermodenuding on the Structure of Nascent Flame Soot Aggregates, Atmosphere, 8, 166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8090166" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos8090166</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bhandari, J., China, S., Chandrakar, K. K., Kinney, G., Cantrell, W., Shaw,
R. A., Mazzoleni, L. R., Girotto, G., Sharma, N., Gorkowski, K., Gilardoni,
S., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Zanca, N., Pavese, G., Esposito, F.,
Dubey, M. K., Aiken, A. C., Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmüller, H., Onasch,
T. B., Zaveri, R. A., Scarnato, B. V., Fialho, P., and Mazzoleni, C.:
Extensive Soot Compaction by Cloud Processing from Laboratory and Field
Observations, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 11824, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48143-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-019-48143-y</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C.: Spectral dependence of visible light absorption by carbonaceous
particles emitted from coal combustion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4075–4078,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001gl013652</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light absorption by carbonaceous
particles: An investigative review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 27–67,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500421521</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bones, D. L., Henricksen, D. K., Mang, S. A., Gonsior, M., Bateman, A. P.,
Nguyen, T. B., Cooper, W. J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Appearance of strong
absorbers and fluorophores in limonene-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> secondary organic aerosol due to
NH4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>-mediated chemical aging over long time scales, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D05203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012864" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd012864</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, C., Enekwizu, O. Y., Fan, X., Dobrzanski, C. D., Ivanova, E. V., Ma,
Y., Gor, G. Y., and Khalizov, A. F.: Single Parameter for Predicting the
Morphology of Atmospheric Black Carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52,
14169–14179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b04201</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Corbin, J. C., Czech, H., Massabò, D., de Mongeot, F. B., Jakobi, G.,
Liu, F., Lobo, P., Mennucci, C., Mensah, A. A., Orasche, J., Pieber, S. M.,
Prévôt, A. S. H., Stengel, B., Tay, L. L., Zanatta, M., Zimmermann,
R., El Haddad, I., and Gysel, M.: Infrared-absorbing carbonaceous tar can
dominate light absorption by marine-engine exhaust, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci.,
2, 12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0069-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-019-0069-5</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cotterell, M. I., Orr-Ewing, A. J., Szpek, K., Haywood, J. M., and Langridge, J. M.: The impact of bath gas composition on the calibration of photoacoustic spectrometers with ozone at discrete visible wavelengths spanning the Chappuis band, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2371–2385, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2371-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-2371-2019</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cotterell, M. I., Ward, G. P., Hibbins, A. P., Wilson, A., Haywood, J. M.,
and Langridge, J. M.: Optimizing the performance of aerosol photoacoustic
cells using a finite element model. Part 2: Application to a two-resonator
cell, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 1128–1148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1648749" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2019.1648749</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cotterell, M. I., Szpek, K., Haywood, J. M., and Langridge, J. M.:
Sensitivity and accuracy of refractive index retrievals from measured
extinction and absorption cross sections for mobility-selected internally
mixed ligh<?pagebreak page16180?>t absorbing aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 54, 1034–1057,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1757034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2020.1757034</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Davies, N. W., Cotterell, M. I., Fox, C., Szpek, K., Haywood, J. M., and Langridge, J. M.: On the accuracy of aerosol photoacoustic spectrometer calibrations using absorption by ozone, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2313–2324, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2313-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-2313-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T., Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac061249n</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>De Haan, D. O., Hawkins, L. N., Welsh, H. G., Pednekar, R., Casar, J. R.,
Pennington, E. A., de Loera, A., Jimenez, N. G., Symons, M. A., Zauscher,
M., Pajunoja, A., Caponi, L., Cazaunau, M., Formenti, P., Gratien, A.,
Pangui, E., and Doussin, J.-F.: Brown Carbon Production in Ammonium- or
Amine-Containing Aerosol Particles by Reactive Uptake of Methylglyoxal and
Photolytic Cloud Cycling, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 7458–7466, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b00159</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility
and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 38, 1185–1205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290903907" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868290903907</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ellis, A., Edwards, R., Saunders, M., Chakrabarty, R. K., Subramanian, R.,
Timms, N. E., van Riessen, A., Smith, A. M., Lambrinidis, D., Nunes, L. J.,
Vallelonga, P., Goodwin, I. D., Moy, A. D., Curran, M. A. J., and van Ommen,
T. D.: Individual particle morphology, coatings, and impurities of black
carbon aerosols in Antarctic ice and tropical rainfall, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
43, 11875–11883, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl071042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016gl071042</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, F., Xu, L., Ye, W., Chen, Y., Jiang, M., and Xu, X.: Morphology of black
carbon aerosols and ubiquity of 50-nanometer black carbon aerosols in the
atmosphere, China Part., 4, 323–326, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60283-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60283-8</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gao, R. S., Schwarz, J. P., Kelly, K. K., Fahey, D. W., Watts, L. A.,
Thompson, T. L., Spackman, J. R., Slowik, J. G., Cross, E. S., Han, J. H.,
Davidovits, P., Onasch, T. B., and Worsnop, D. R.: A Novel Method for
Estimating Light-Scattering Properties of Soot Aerosols Using a Modified
Single-Particle Soot Photometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 125–135,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820601118398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820601118398</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Good, N., Coe, H., and McFiggans, G.: Instrumentational operation and analytical methodology for the reconciliation of aerosol water uptake under sub- and supersaturated conditions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1241–1254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1241-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-1241-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harrison, M. A. J., Barra, S., Borghesi, D., Vione, D., Arsene, C., and
Iulian Olariu, R.: Nitrated phenols in the atmosphere: a review, Atmos.
Environ., 39, 231–248, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.044</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Haslett, S. L., Thomas, J. C., Morgan, W. T., Hadden, R., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Williams, P. I., Keita, S., Liousse, C., and Coe, H.: Highly controlled, reproducible measurements of aerosol emissions from combustion of a common African biofuel source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 385–403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-385-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-385-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Haywood, J. M. and Shine, K. P.: The effect of anthropogenic sulfate and
soot aerosol on the clear sky planetary radiation budget, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 22, 603–606, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00075" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95GL00075</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, D.: Figures of the manuscript of “Physical and chemical properties of black carbon and organic matter from different combustion and photochemical sources using aerodynamic aerosol classification”, figshare [Figures], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15172572.v1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6084/m9.figshare.15172572.v1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb,
C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for
Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
33, 49–70, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868200410840</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kazemimanesh, M., Moallemi, A., Thomson, K., Smallwood, G., Lobo, P., and
Olfert, J. S.: A novel miniature inverted-flame burner for the generation of
soot nanoparticles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 184–195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1556774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2018.1556774</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kim, J. H., Mulholland, G. W., Kukuck, S. R., and Pui, D. Y.: Slip
Correction Measurements of Certified PSL Nanoparticles Using a Nanometer
Differential Mobility Analyzer (Nano-DMA) for Knudsen Number From 0.5 to 83,
J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stan.,
110, 31–54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.110.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6028/jres.110.005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kimmel, J. R., Farmer, D. K., Cubison, M. J., Sueper, D., Tanner, C.,
Nemitz, E., Worsnop, D. R., Gonin, M., and Jimenez, J. L.: Real-time aerosol
mass spectrometry with millisecond resolution, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 303,
15–26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2010.12.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2010.12.004</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D21208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd004999</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laborde, M., Mertes, P., Zieger, P., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., and Gysel, M.: Sensitivity of the Single Particle Soot Photometer to different black carbon types, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1031–1043, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1031-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-1031-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laborde, M., Schnaiter, M., Linke, C., Saathoff, H., Naumann, K.-H., Möhler, O., Berlenz, S., Wagner, U., Taylor, J. W., Liu, D., Flynn, M., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Heimerl, K., Dahlkötter, F., Weinzierl, B., Wollny, A. G., Zanatta, M., Cozic, J., Laj, P., Hitzenberger, R., Schwarz, J. P., and Gysel, M.: Single Particle Soot Photometer intercomparison at the AIDA chamber, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 3077–3097, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-3077-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-3077-2012</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric
Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Leung, K. K., Schnitzler, E. G., Jäger, W., and Olfert, J. S.: Relative
Humidity Dependence of Soot Aggregate Restructuring Induced by Secondary
Organic Aerosol: Effects of Water on Coating Viscosity and Surface Tension,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 4, 386–390, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00298" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00298</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, C., Hu, Y., Chen, J., Ma, Z., Ye, X., Yang, X., Wang, L., Wang, X., and
Mellouki, A.: Physiochemical properties of carbonaceous aerosol from
agricultural residue burning: Density, volatility, and hygroscopicity,
Atmos. Environ., 140, 94–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.052</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page16181?><ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Liu, J., Shilling, J. E., Kathmann, S. M., Laskin, J., and Laskin,
A.: Molecular characterization of brown carbon (BrC) chromophores in
secondary organic aerosol generated from photo-oxidation of toluene, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 23312–23325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02563J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP02563J</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Flynn, M., Gysel, M., Targino, A., Crawford, I., Bower, K., Choularton, T., Jurányi, Z., Steinbacher, M., Hüglin, C., Curtius, J., Kampus, M., Petzold, A., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., and Coe, H.: Single particle characterization of black carbon aerosols at a tropospheric alpine site in Switzerland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7389–7407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7389-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7389-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Young, D. E., Coe, H., Beddows, D., Fleming, Z. L., Flynn, M. J., Gallagher, M. W., Harrison, R. M., Lee, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Taylor, J. W., Yin, J., Williams, P. I., and Zotter, P.: Size distribution, mixing state and source apportionment of black carbon aerosol in London during wintertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10061–10084, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10061-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10061-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen,
D. V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C.,
Haslett, S., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T.,
McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption
enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state, Nat.
Geosci., 10, 184–188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2901</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Taylor, J. W., Crosier, J., Marsden, N., Bower, K. N., Lloyd, G., Ryder, C. L., Brooke, J. K., Cotton, R., Marenco, F., Blyth, A., Cui, Z., Estelles, V., Gallagher, M., Coe, H., and Choularton, T. W.: Aircraft and ground measurements of dust aerosols over the west African coast in summer 2015 during ICE-D and AER-D, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3817–3838, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3817-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-3817-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., He, C., Schwarz, J. P., and Wang, X.: Lifecycle of light-absorbing
carbonaceous aerosols in the atmosphere, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 3, 40,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-00145-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-020-00145-8</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, F., Yon, J., Fuentes, A., Lobo, P., Smallwood, G. J., and Corbin, J.
C.: Review of recent literature on the light absorption properties of black
carbon: Refractive index, mass absorption cross section, and absorption
function, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 54, 33–51, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1676878" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2019.1676878</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lu, J. W., Flores, J. M., Lavi, A., Abo-Riziq, A., and Rudich, Y.: Changes
in the optical properties of benzo[a]pyrene-coated aerosols upon
heterogeneous reactions with NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13,
6484–6492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP02114H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C0CP02114H</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Maxut, A., Nozière, B., Fenet, B., and Mechakra, H.: Formation
mechanisms and yields of small imidazoles from reactions of glyoxal with
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in water at neutral pH, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 20416–20424,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP03113C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP03113C</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miles, R. E. H., Rudić, S., Orr-Ewing, A. J., and Reid, J. P.: Sources
of Error and Uncertainty in the Use of Cavity Ring Down Spectroscopy to
Measure Aerosol Optical Properties, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 1360–1375,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.596170" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.596170</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miller, A., Frey, G., King, G., and Sunderman, C.: A Handheld Electrostatic
Precipitator for Sampling Airborne Particles and Nanoparticles, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 44, 417–427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003692063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786821003692063</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moallemi, A., Kazemimanesh, M., Corbin, J. C., Thomson, K., Smallwood, G.,
Olfert, J. S., and Lobo, P.: Characterization of black carbon particles
generated by a propane-fueled miniature inverted soot generator, J. Aerosol
Sci., 135, 46–57, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.05.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.05.004</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moteki, N. and Kondo, Y.: Effects of Mixing State on Black Carbon
Measurements by Laser-Induced Incandescence, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41,
398–417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701199728" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820701199728</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nakao, S., Tang, P., Tang, X., Clark, C. H., Qi, L., Seo, E., Asa-Awuku, A.,
and Cocker, D.: Density and elemental ratios of secondary organic aerosol:
Application of a density prediction method, Atmos. Environ., 68, 273–277,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.006</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nakayama, T., Matsumi, Y., Sato, K., Imamura, T., Yamazaki, A., and
Uchiyama, A.: Laboratory studies on optical properties of secondary organic
aerosols generated during the photooxidation of toluene and the ozonolysis
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014387" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd014387</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Noziere, B. and Esteve, W.: Light-absorbing aldol condensation products in
acidic aerosols: Spectra, kinetics, and contribution to the absorption
index, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1150–1163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.001</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Olfert, J. S. and Collings, N.: New method for particle mass
classification – the Couette centrifugal particle mass analyzer, J.
Aerosol Sci., 36, 1338–1352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.03.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.03.006</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Olfert, J. S., Reavell, K. S., Rushton, M. G., and Collings, N.: The
experimental transfer function of the Couette centrifugal particle mass
analyzer, J. Aerosol Sci., 37, 1840–1852, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.07.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.07.007</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paglione, M., Gilardoni, S., Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Zanca, N., Sandrini, S., Giulianelli, L., Bacco, D., Ferrari, S., Poluzzi, V., Scotto, F., Trentini, A., Poulain, L., Herrmann, H., Wiedensohler, A., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Massoli, P., Carbone, C., Facchini, M. C., and Fuzzi, S.: The impact of biomass burning and aqueous-phase processing on air quality: a multi-year source apportionment study in the Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1233–1254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1233-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1233-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Park, K., Cao, F., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Relationship
between Particle Mass and Mobility for Diesel Exhaust Particles, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 37, 577–583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es025960v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es025960v</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Park, K., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Structural Properties of
Diesel Exhaust Particles Measured by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM):
Relationships to Particle Mass and Mobility, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38,
881–889, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290505189" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868290505189</ext-link>, 2004a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Park, K., Kittelson, D., Zachariah, M., and McMurry, P.: Measurement of
Inherent Material Density of Nanoparticle Agglomerates, J. Nanoparticle
Res., 6, 267–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6</ext-link>, 2004b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Powelson, M. H., Espelien, B. M., Hawkins, L. N., Galloway, M. M., and De
Haan, D. O.: Brown Carbon Formation by Aqueous-Phase Carbonyl Compound
Reactions with Amine<?pagebreak page16182?>s and Ammonium Sulfate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
985–993, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es4038325" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es4038325</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ramanathan, V., Li, F., Ramana, M. V., Praveen, P. S., Kim, D., Corrigan, C.
E., Nguyen, H., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Carmichael, G. R., Adhikary,
B., and Yoon, S. C.: Atmospheric brown clouds: Hemispherical and regional
variations in long-range transport, absorption, and radiative forcing, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D22S21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd008124</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sedlacek, A. J., Onasch, T. B., Nichman, L., Lewis, E. R., Davidovits, P.,
Freedman, A., and Williams, L.: Formation of refractory black carbon by
SP2-induced charring of organic aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52,
1345–1350, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1531107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2018.1531107</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shao, Y., Wang, Y., Du, M., Voliotis, A., Alfarra, M. R., Turner, S. F., and McFiggans, G.: Characterisation of the Manchester Aerosol Chamber facility, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-147" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2021-147</ext-link>, in review, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shapiro, E. L., Szprengiel, J., Sareen, N., Jen, C. N., Giordano, M. R., and McNeill, V. F.: Light-absorbing secondary organic material formed by glyoxal in aqueous aerosol mimics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2289–2300, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Slowik, J. G., Stainken, K., Davidovits, P., Williams, L. R., Jayne, J. T.,
Kolb, C. E., Worsnop, D. R., Rudich, Y., DeCarlo, P. F., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and
Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 2: Application to
Combustion-Generated Soot Aerosols as a Function of Fuel Equivalence Ratio,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38, 1206–1222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290903916" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868290903916</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sorensen, C. M.: The Mobility of Fractal Aggregates: A Review, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 45, 765–779, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560909" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.560909</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tavakoli, F., Symonds, J. P. R., and Olfert, J. S.: Generation of a
Monodisperse Size-Classified Aerosol Independent of Particle Charge, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 48, i–iv, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.877121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2013.877121</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Teoh, R., Stettler, M. E. J., Majumdar, A., Schumann, U., Graves, B., and
Boies, A. M.: A methodology to relate black carbon particle number and mass
emissions, J. Aerosol Sci., 132, 44–59, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.03.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.03.006</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Turpin, B. J. and Lim, H.-J.: Species Contributions to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Mass
Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 35, 602–610, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820119445" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820119445</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Voliotis, A., Prokeš, R., Lammel, G., and Samara, C.: New insights on
humic-like substances associated with wintertime urban aerosols from central
and southern Europe: Size-resolved chemical characterization and optical
properties, Atmos. Environ., 166, 286–299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.024</ext-link>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Voliotis, A., Wang, Y., Shao, Y., Du, M., Bannan, T. J., Percival, C. J., Pandis, S. N., Alfarra, M. R., and McFiggans, G.: Exploring the composition and volatility of secondary organic aerosols in mixed anthropogenic and biogenic precursor systems, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14251–14273, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14251-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-14251-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wentzel, M., Gorzawski, H., Naumann, K. H., Saathoff, H., and Weinbruch, S.:
Transmission electron microscopical and aerosol dynamical characterization
of soot aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 1347–1370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, Y., Xia, Y., Huang, R., Deng, Z., Tian, P., Xia, X., and Zhang, R.: A study of the morphology and effective density of externally mixed black carbon aerosols in ambient air using a size-resolved single-particle soot photometer (SP2), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 4347–4359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4347-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-4347-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xiong, C. and Friedlander, S. K.: Morphological properties of atmospheric
aerosol aggregates, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 11851–11856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211376098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.211376098</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zarzana, K. J., Cappa, C. D., and Tolbert, M. A.: Sensitivity of Aerosol
Refractive Index Retrievals Using Optical Spectroscopy, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 48, 1133–1144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.963498" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2014.963498</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zeng, C., Liu, C., Li, J., Zhu, B., Yin, Y., and Wang, Y.: Optical
Properties and Radiative Forcing of Aged BC due to Hygroscopic Growth:
Effects of the Aggregate Structure, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 4620–4633,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029809" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018jd029809</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhai, J., Lu, X., Li, L., Zhang, Q., Zhang, C., Chen, H., Yang, X., and Chen, J.: Size-resolved chemical composition, effective density, and optical properties of biomass burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7481–7493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7481-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7481-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Khalizov, A. F., Pagels, J., Zhang, D., Xue, H., and McMurry, P.
H.: Variability in morphology, hygroscopicity, and optical properties of
soot aerosols during atmospheric processing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105,
10291, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804860105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0804860105</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Lin, Y.-H., Surratt, J. D., and Weber, R. J.: Sources,
Composition and Absorption Ångström Exponent of Light-absorbing
Organic Components in Aerosol Extracts from the Los Angeles Basin, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 47, 3685–3693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es305047b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es305047b</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zuidema, P., Redemann, J., Haywood, J., Wood, R., Piketh, S., Hipondoka, M.,
and Formenti, P.: Smoke and Clouds above the Southeast Atlantic: Upcoming
Field Campaigns Probe Absorbing Aerosol's Impact on Climate, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 97, 1131–1135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-15-00082.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/bams-d-15-00082.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Physical and chemical properties of black carbon and organic matter from different combustion and photochemical sources using aerodynamic aerosol classification</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adachi, K., Sedlacek, A. J., Kleinman, L., Springston, S. R., Wang, J.,
Chand, D., Hubbe, J. M., Shilling, J. E., Onasch, T. B., Kinase, T., Sakata,
K., Takahashi, Y., and Buseck, P. R.: Spherical tarball particles form
through rapid chemical and physical changes of organic matter in
biomass-burning smoke, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 19336–19341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900129116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900129116</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alfarra, M. R., Paulsen, D., Gysel, M., Garforth, A. A., Dommen, J., Prévôt, A. S. H., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Coe, H.: A mass spectrometric study of secondary organic aerosols formed from the photooxidation of anthropogenic and biogenic precursors in a reaction chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5279–5293, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5279-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5279-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Sandradewi, J., Weimer, S.,
Lanz, V. A., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., and Baltensperger, U.: Identification
of the Mass Spectral Signature of Organic Aerosols from Wood Burning
Emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5770–5777, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es062289b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es062289b</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Alfarra, M. R., Hamilton, J. F., Wyche, K. P., Good, N., Ward, M. W., Carr, T., Barley, M. H., Monks, P. S., Jenkin, M. E., Lewis, A. C., and McFiggans, G. B.: The effect of photochemical ageing and initial precursor concentration on the composition and hygroscopic properties of <i>β</i>-caryophyllene secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6417–6436, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6417-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6417-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Allan, J. D., Jimenez, J. L., Williams, P. I., Alfarra, M. R., Bower, K. N., Jayne, J. T., Coe, H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer – 1. Techniques of data interpretation and error analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002358" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002358</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Allan, J. D., Delia, A. E., Coe, H., Bower, K. N., Alfarra, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Middlebrook, A. M., Drewnick, F., Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: A generalised method for the extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer data, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 909–922, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O. and Crutzen, P. J.: Atmospheric Aerosols: Biogeochemical
Sources and Role in Atmospheric Chemistry, Science, 276, 1052–1058,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5315.1052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5315.1052</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bhandari, J., China, S., Onasch, T., Wolff, L., Lambe, A., Davidovits, P., Cross, E., Ahern, A., Olfert, J., Dubey, M., and Mazzoleni, C.: Effect of Thermodenuding on the Structure of Nascent Flame Soot Aggregates, Atmosphere, 8, 166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8090166" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8090166</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bhandari, J., China, S., Chandrakar, K. K., Kinney, G., Cantrell, W., Shaw,
R. A., Mazzoleni, L. R., Girotto, G., Sharma, N., Gorkowski, K., Gilardoni,
S., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Zanca, N., Pavese, G., Esposito, F.,
Dubey, M. K., Aiken, A. C., Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmüller, H., Onasch,
T. B., Zaveri, R. A., Scarnato, B. V., Fialho, P., and Mazzoleni, C.:
Extensive Soot Compaction by Cloud Processing from Laboratory and Field
Observations, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 11824, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48143-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48143-y</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C.: Spectral dependence of visible light absorption by carbonaceous
particles emitted from coal combustion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4075–4078,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013652" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013652</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light absorption by carbonaceous
particles: An investigative review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 27–67,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bones, D. L., Henricksen, D. K., Mang, S. A., Gonsior, M., Bateman, A. P.,
Nguyen, T. B., Cooper, W. J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Appearance of strong
absorbers and fluorophores in limonene-O<sub>3</sub> secondary organic aerosol due to
NH4+-mediated chemical aging over long time scales, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D05203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012864" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012864</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C., Enekwizu, O. Y., Fan, X., Dobrzanski, C. D., Ivanova, E. V., Ma,
Y., Gor, G. Y., and Khalizov, A. F.: Single Parameter for Predicting the
Morphology of Atmospheric Black Carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52,
14169–14179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04201</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Corbin, J. C., Czech, H., Massabò, D., de Mongeot, F. B., Jakobi, G.,
Liu, F., Lobo, P., Mennucci, C., Mensah, A. A., Orasche, J., Pieber, S. M.,
Prévôt, A. S. H., Stengel, B., Tay, L. L., Zanatta, M., Zimmermann,
R., El Haddad, I., and Gysel, M.: Infrared-absorbing carbonaceous tar can
dominate light absorption by marine-engine exhaust, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci.,
2, 12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0069-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0069-5</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cotterell, M. I., Orr-Ewing, A. J., Szpek, K., Haywood, J. M., and Langridge, J. M.: The impact of bath gas composition on the calibration of photoacoustic spectrometers with ozone at discrete visible wavelengths spanning the Chappuis band, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2371–2385, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2371-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2371-2019</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cotterell, M. I., Ward, G. P., Hibbins, A. P., Wilson, A., Haywood, J. M.,
and Langridge, J. M.: Optimizing the performance of aerosol photoacoustic
cells using a finite element model. Part 2: Application to a two-resonator
cell, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 1128–1148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1648749" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1648749</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Cotterell, M. I., Szpek, K., Haywood, J. M., and Langridge, J. M.:
Sensitivity and accuracy of refractive index retrievals from measured
extinction and absorption cross sections for mobility-selected internally
mixed light absorbing aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 54, 1034–1057,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1757034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1757034</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Davies, N. W., Cotterell, M. I., Fox, C., Szpek, K., Haywood, J. M., and Langridge, J. M.: On the accuracy of aerosol photoacoustic spectrometer calibrations using absorption by ozone, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2313–2324, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2313-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2313-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T., Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
De Haan, D. O., Hawkins, L. N., Welsh, H. G., Pednekar, R., Casar, J. R.,
Pennington, E. A., de Loera, A., Jimenez, N. G., Symons, M. A., Zauscher,
M., Pajunoja, A., Caponi, L., Cazaunau, M., Formenti, P., Gratien, A.,
Pangui, E., and Doussin, J.-F.: Brown Carbon Production in Ammonium- or
Amine-Containing Aerosol Particles by Reactive Uptake of Methylglyoxal and
Photolytic Cloud Cycling, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 7458–7466, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00159</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility
and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 38, 1185–1205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290903907" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290903907</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Ellis, A., Edwards, R., Saunders, M., Chakrabarty, R. K., Subramanian, R.,
Timms, N. E., van Riessen, A., Smith, A. M., Lambrinidis, D., Nunes, L. J.,
Vallelonga, P., Goodwin, I. D., Moy, A. D., Curran, M. A. J., and van Ommen,
T. D.: Individual particle morphology, coatings, and impurities of black
carbon aerosols in Antarctic ice and tropical rainfall, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
43, 11875–11883, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl071042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl071042</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, F., Xu, L., Ye, W., Chen, Y., Jiang, M., and Xu, X.: Morphology of black
carbon aerosols and ubiquity of 50-nanometer black carbon aerosols in the
atmosphere, China Part., 4, 323–326, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60283-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60283-8</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, R. S., Schwarz, J. P., Kelly, K. K., Fahey, D. W., Watts, L. A.,
Thompson, T. L., Spackman, J. R., Slowik, J. G., Cross, E. S., Han, J. H.,
Davidovits, P., Onasch, T. B., and Worsnop, D. R.: A Novel Method for
Estimating Light-Scattering Properties of Soot Aerosols Using a Modified
Single-Particle Soot Photometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 125–135,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820601118398" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820601118398</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Good, N., Coe, H., and McFiggans, G.: Instrumentational operation and analytical methodology for the reconciliation of aerosol water uptake under sub- and supersaturated conditions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1241–1254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1241-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1241-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, M. A. J., Barra, S., Borghesi, D., Vione, D., Arsene, C., and
Iulian Olariu, R.: Nitrated phenols in the atmosphere: a review, Atmos.
Environ., 39, 231–248, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.044</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Haslett, S. L., Thomas, J. C., Morgan, W. T., Hadden, R., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Williams, P. I., Keita, S., Liousse, C., and Coe, H.: Highly controlled, reproducible measurements of aerosol emissions from combustion of a common African biofuel source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 385–403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-385-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-385-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Haywood, J. M. and Shine, K. P.: The effect of anthropogenic sulfate and
soot aerosol on the clear sky planetary radiation budget, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 22, 603–606, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00075" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00075</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, D.: Figures of the manuscript of “Physical and chemical properties of black carbon and organic matter from different combustion and photochemical sources using aerodynamic aerosol classification”, figshare [Figures], <a href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15172572.v1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15172572.v1</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb,
C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for
Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
33, 49–70, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kazemimanesh, M., Moallemi, A., Thomson, K., Smallwood, G., Lobo, P., and
Olfert, J. S.: A novel miniature inverted-flame burner for the generation of
soot nanoparticles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 184–195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1556774" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1556774</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, J. H., Mulholland, G. W., Kukuck, S. R., and Pui, D. Y.: Slip
Correction Measurements of Certified PSL Nanoparticles Using a Nanometer
Differential Mobility Analyzer (Nano-DMA) for Knudsen Number From 0.5 to 83,
J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stan.,
110, 31–54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.110.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.110.005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kimmel, J. R., Farmer, D. K., Cubison, M. J., Sueper, D., Tanner, C.,
Nemitz, E., Worsnop, D. R., Gonin, M., and Jimenez, J. L.: Real-time aerosol
mass spectrometry with millisecond resolution, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 303,
15–26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2010.12.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2010.12.004</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D21208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004999" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004999</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Laborde, M., Mertes, P., Zieger, P., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., and Gysel, M.: Sensitivity of the Single Particle Soot Photometer to different black carbon types, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1031–1043, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1031-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1031-2012</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Laborde, M., Schnaiter, M., Linke, C., Saathoff, H., Naumann, K.-H., Möhler, O., Berlenz, S., Wagner, U., Taylor, J. W., Liu, D., Flynn, M., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Heimerl, K., Dahlkötter, F., Weinzierl, B., Wollny, A. G., Zanatta, M., Cozic, J., Laj, P., Hitzenberger, R., Schwarz, J. P., and Gysel, M.: Single Particle Soot Photometer intercomparison at the AIDA chamber, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 3077–3097, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-3077-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-3077-2012</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric
Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Leung, K. K., Schnitzler, E. G., Jäger, W., and Olfert, J. S.: Relative
Humidity Dependence of Soot Aggregate Restructuring Induced by Secondary
Organic Aerosol: Effects of Water on Coating Viscosity and Surface Tension,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 4, 386–390, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00298" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00298</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Hu, Y., Chen, J., Ma, Z., Ye, X., Yang, X., Wang, L., Wang, X., and
Mellouki, A.: Physiochemical properties of carbonaceous aerosol from
agricultural residue burning: Density, volatility, and hygroscopicity,
Atmos. Environ., 140, 94–105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.052</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Liu, J., Shilling, J. E., Kathmann, S. M., Laskin, J., and Laskin,
A.: Molecular characterization of brown carbon (BrC) chromophores in
secondary organic aerosol generated from photo-oxidation of toluene, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 23312–23325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02563J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02563J</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Flynn, M., Gysel, M., Targino, A., Crawford, I., Bower, K., Choularton, T., Jurányi, Z., Steinbacher, M., Hüglin, C., Curtius, J., Kampus, M., Petzold, A., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., and Coe, H.: Single particle characterization of black carbon aerosols at a tropospheric alpine site in Switzerland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7389–7407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7389-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7389-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Young, D. E., Coe, H., Beddows, D., Fleming, Z. L., Flynn, M. J., Gallagher, M. W., Harrison, R. M., Lee, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Taylor, J. W., Yin, J., Williams, P. I., and Zotter, P.: Size distribution, mixing state and source apportionment of black carbon aerosol in London during wintertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10061–10084, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10061-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10061-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen,
D. V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C.,
Haslett, S., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T.,
McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption
enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state, Nat.
Geosci., 10, 184–188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Taylor, J. W., Crosier, J., Marsden, N., Bower, K. N., Lloyd, G., Ryder, C. L., Brooke, J. K., Cotton, R., Marenco, F., Blyth, A., Cui, Z., Estelles, V., Gallagher, M., Coe, H., and Choularton, T. W.: Aircraft and ground measurements of dust aerosols over the west African coast in summer 2015 during ICE-D and AER-D, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3817–3838, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3817-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3817-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., He, C., Schwarz, J. P., and Wang, X.: Lifecycle of light-absorbing
carbonaceous aerosols in the atmosphere, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 3, 40,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-00145-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-00145-8</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, F., Yon, J., Fuentes, A., Lobo, P., Smallwood, G. J., and Corbin, J.
C.: Review of recent literature on the light absorption properties of black
carbon: Refractive index, mass absorption cross section, and absorption
function, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 54, 33–51, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1676878" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1676878</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, J. W., Flores, J. M., Lavi, A., Abo-Riziq, A., and Rudich, Y.: Changes
in the optical properties of benzo[a]pyrene-coated aerosols upon
heterogeneous reactions with NO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>3</sub>, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13,
6484–6492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP02114H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP02114H</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Maxut, A., Nozière, B., Fenet, B., and Mechakra, H.: Formation
mechanisms and yields of small imidazoles from reactions of glyoxal with
NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in water at neutral pH, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 20416–20424,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP03113C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP03113C</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Miles, R. E. H., Rudić, S., Orr-Ewing, A. J., and Reid, J. P.: Sources
of Error and Uncertainty in the Use of Cavity Ring Down Spectroscopy to
Measure Aerosol Optical Properties, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 1360–1375,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.596170" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.596170</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, A., Frey, G., King, G., and Sunderman, C.: A Handheld Electrostatic
Precipitator for Sampling Airborne Particles and Nanoparticles, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 44, 417–427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003692063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003692063</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Moallemi, A., Kazemimanesh, M., Corbin, J. C., Thomson, K., Smallwood, G.,
Olfert, J. S., and Lobo, P.: Characterization of black carbon particles
generated by a propane-fueled miniature inverted soot generator, J. Aerosol
Sci., 135, 46–57, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.05.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.05.004</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Moteki, N. and Kondo, Y.: Effects of Mixing State on Black Carbon
Measurements by Laser-Induced Incandescence, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41,
398–417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701199728" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701199728</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Nakao, S., Tang, P., Tang, X., Clark, C. H., Qi, L., Seo, E., Asa-Awuku, A.,
and Cocker, D.: Density and elemental ratios of secondary organic aerosol:
Application of a density prediction method, Atmos. Environ., 68, 273–277,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.006</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Nakayama, T., Matsumi, Y., Sato, K., Imamura, T., Yamazaki, A., and
Uchiyama, A.: Laboratory studies on optical properties of secondary organic
aerosols generated during the photooxidation of toluene and the ozonolysis
of <i>α</i>-pinene, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014387" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014387</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Noziere, B. and Esteve, W.: Light-absorbing aldol condensation products in
acidic aerosols: Spectra, kinetics, and contribution to the absorption
index, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1150–1163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.001</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Olfert, J. S. and Collings, N.: New method for particle mass
classification – the Couette centrifugal particle mass analyzer, J.
Aerosol Sci., 36, 1338–1352, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.03.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.03.006</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Olfert, J. S., Reavell, K. S., Rushton, M. G., and Collings, N.: The
experimental transfer function of the Couette centrifugal particle mass
analyzer, J. Aerosol Sci., 37, 1840–1852, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.07.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.07.007</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Paglione, M., Gilardoni, S., Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Zanca, N., Sandrini, S., Giulianelli, L., Bacco, D., Ferrari, S., Poluzzi, V., Scotto, F., Trentini, A., Poulain, L., Herrmann, H., Wiedensohler, A., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Massoli, P., Carbone, C., Facchini, M. C., and Fuzzi, S.: The impact of biomass burning and aqueous-phase processing on air quality: a multi-year source apportionment study in the Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1233–1254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1233-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1233-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Park, K., Cao, F., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Relationship
between Particle Mass and Mobility for Diesel Exhaust Particles, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 37, 577–583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es025960v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es025960v</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Park, K., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Structural Properties of
Diesel Exhaust Particles Measured by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM):
Relationships to Particle Mass and Mobility, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38,
881–889, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290505189" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290505189</a>, 2004a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Park, K., Kittelson, D., Zachariah, M., and McMurry, P.: Measurement of
Inherent Material Density of Nanoparticle Agglomerates, J. Nanoparticle
Res., 6, 267–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6</a>, 2004b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Powelson, M. H., Espelien, B. M., Hawkins, L. N., Galloway, M. M., and De
Haan, D. O.: Brown Carbon Formation by Aqueous-Phase Carbonyl Compound
Reactions with Amines and Ammonium Sulfate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
985–993, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es4038325" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es4038325</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V., Li, F., Ramana, M. V., Praveen, P. S., Kim, D., Corrigan, C.
E., Nguyen, H., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Carmichael, G. R., Adhikary,
B., and Yoon, S. C.: Atmospheric brown clouds: Hemispherical and regional
variations in long-range transport, absorption, and radiative forcing, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D22S21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008124" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008124</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Sedlacek, A. J., Onasch, T. B., Nichman, L., Lewis, E. R., Davidovits, P.,
Freedman, A., and Williams, L.: Formation of refractory black carbon by
SP2-induced charring of organic aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52,
1345–1350, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1531107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1531107</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Shao, Y., Wang, Y., Du, M., Voliotis, A., Alfarra, M. R., Turner, S. F., and McFiggans, G.: Characterisation of the Manchester Aerosol Chamber facility, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-147" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-147</a>, in review, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Shapiro, E. L., Szprengiel, J., Sareen, N., Jen, C. N., Giordano, M. R., and McNeill, V. F.: Light-absorbing secondary organic material formed by glyoxal in aqueous aerosol mimics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2289–2300, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Slowik, J. G., Stainken, K., Davidovits, P., Williams, L. R., Jayne, J. T.,
Kolb, C. E., Worsnop, D. R., Rudich, Y., DeCarlo, P. F., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and
Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 2: Application to
Combustion-Generated Soot Aerosols as a Function of Fuel Equivalence Ratio,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38, 1206–1222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290903916" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290903916</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Sorensen, C. M.: The Mobility of Fractal Aggregates: A Review, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 45, 765–779, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560909" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560909</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Tavakoli, F., Symonds, J. P. R., and Olfert, J. S.: Generation of a
Monodisperse Size-Classified Aerosol Independent of Particle Charge, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 48, i–iv, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.877121" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.877121</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Teoh, R., Stettler, M. E. J., Majumdar, A., Schumann, U., Graves, B., and
Boies, A. M.: A methodology to relate black carbon particle number and mass
emissions, J. Aerosol Sci., 132, 44–59, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.03.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.03.006</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Turpin, B. J. and Lim, H.-J.: Species Contributions to PM<sub>2.5</sub> Mass
Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 35, 602–610, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820119445" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820119445</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Voliotis, A., Prokeš, R., Lammel, G., and Samara, C.: New insights on
humic-like substances associated with wintertime urban aerosols from central
and southern Europe: Size-resolved chemical characterization and optical
properties, Atmos. Environ., 166, 286–299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.024</a>, 2017.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Voliotis, A., Wang, Y., Shao, Y., Du, M., Bannan, T. J., Percival, C. J., Pandis, S. N., Alfarra, M. R., and McFiggans, G.: Exploring the composition and volatility of secondary organic aerosols in mixed anthropogenic and biogenic precursor systems, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14251–14273, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14251-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14251-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Wentzel, M., Gorzawski, H., Naumann, K. H., Saathoff, H., and Weinbruch, S.:
Transmission electron microscopical and aerosol dynamical characterization
of soot aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 1347–1370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Y., Xia, Y., Huang, R., Deng, Z., Tian, P., Xia, X., and Zhang, R.: A study of the morphology and effective density of externally mixed black carbon aerosols in ambient air using a size-resolved single-particle soot photometer (SP2), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 4347–4359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4347-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4347-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Xiong, C. and Friedlander, S. K.: Morphological properties of atmospheric
aerosol aggregates, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 11851–11856, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211376098" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211376098</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Zarzana, K. J., Cappa, C. D., and Tolbert, M. A.: Sensitivity of Aerosol
Refractive Index Retrievals Using Optical Spectroscopy, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 48, 1133–1144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.963498" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.963498</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Zeng, C., Liu, C., Li, J., Zhu, B., Yin, Y., and Wang, Y.: Optical
Properties and Radiative Forcing of Aged BC due to Hygroscopic Growth:
Effects of the Aggregate Structure, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 4620–4633,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029809" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029809</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Zhai, J., Lu, X., Li, L., Zhang, Q., Zhang, C., Chen, H., Yang, X., and Chen, J.: Size-resolved chemical composition, effective density, and optical properties of biomass burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7481–7493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7481-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7481-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Khalizov, A. F., Pagels, J., Zhang, D., Xue, H., and McMurry, P.
H.: Variability in morphology, hygroscopicity, and optical properties of
soot aerosols during atmospheric processing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105,
10291, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804860105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804860105</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Lin, Y.-H., Surratt, J. D., and Weber, R. J.: Sources,
Composition and Absorption Ångström Exponent of Light-absorbing
Organic Components in Aerosol Extracts from the Los Angeles Basin, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 47, 3685–3693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es305047b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es305047b</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Zuidema, P., Redemann, J., Haywood, J., Wood, R., Piketh, S., Hipondoka, M.,
and Formenti, P.: Smoke and Clouds above the Southeast Atlantic: Upcoming
Field Campaigns Probe Absorbing Aerosol's Impact on Climate, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 97, 1131–1135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-15-00082.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-15-00082.1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
