<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?><?xmltex \hack{\hyphenation{Karls-ruhe}}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-13903-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Heterogeneous ice nucleation ability of aerosol particles generated from
Arctic sea surface microlayer and surface seawater samples at cirrus
temperatures</article-title><alt-title>Cirrus formation by Arctic marine aerosol particles</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Cirrus formation by Arctic marine aerosol particles}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R.~Wagner et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wagner</surname><given-names>Robert</given-names></name>
          <email>robert.wagner2@kit.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-5432</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Ickes</surname><given-names>Luisa</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8772-4164</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Bertram</surname><given-names>Allan K.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-2323</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Els</surname><given-names>Nora</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8486-9461</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Gorokhova</surname><given-names>Elena</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Möhler</surname><given-names>Ottmar</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7551-9814</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Murray</surname><given-names>Benjamin J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8198-8131</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Umo</surname><given-names>Nsikanabasi Silas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Salter</surname><given-names>Matthew E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0645-3265</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of
Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers, Gothenburg,
Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver,
Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry &amp;
Bolin Centre for Climate Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United
Kingdom</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Robert Wagner (robert.wagner2@kit.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>21</day><month>September</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>18</issue>
      <fpage>13903</fpage><lpage>13930</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>August</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>19</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e190">Sea spray aerosol particles are a recognised type of
ice-nucleating particles under mixed-phase cloud conditions. Entities that
are responsible for the heterogeneous ice nucleation ability include intact
or fragmented cells of marine microorganisms as well as organic matter
released by cell exudation. Only a small fraction of sea spray aerosol is
transported to the upper troposphere, but there are indications from
mass-spectrometric analyses of the residuals of sublimated cirrus particles
that sea salt could also contribute to heterogeneous ice nucleation under
cirrus conditions. Experimental studies on the heterogeneous ice nucleation
ability of sea spray aerosol particles and their proxies at temperatures
below 235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are still scarce. In our article, we summarise previous
measurements and present a new set of ice nucleation experiments at cirrus
temperatures with particles generated from sea surface microlayer and
surface seawater samples collected in three different regions of the Arctic
and from a laboratory-grown diatom culture (<italic>Skeletonema marinoi</italic>). The particles were suspended in the Aerosol Interaction and Dynamics in the Atmosphere (AIDA) cloud chamber and ice formation was induced by expansion cooling. We confirmed that under cirrus conditions, apart from the
ice-nucleating entities mentioned above, also crystalline inorganic salt
constituents can contribute to heterogeneous ice formation. This takes place
at temperatures below 220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where we observed in all experiments a strong
immersion freezing mode due to the only partially deliquesced inorganic
salts. The inferred ice nucleation active surface site densities for this
nucleation mode reached a maximum of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at an ice saturation ratio of 1.3. Much smaller densities in the range of
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed at temperatures between 220 and
235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the inorganic salts fully deliquesced and only the organic
matter and/or algal cells and cell debris could contribute to heterogeneous
ice formation. These values are 2 orders of magnitude smaller than those previously reported for particles generated from microlayer suspensions
collected in temperate and subtropical zones. While this difference might
simply underline the strong variability of the number of ice-nucleating entities in the sea surface microlayer across different geographical regions, we also discuss how instrumental parameters like the aerosolisation
method and the ice nucleation measurement technique might affect the comparability of the results amongst different studies.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
<?pagebreak page13904?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <label>1.1</label><title>Sea spray aerosol as a source of ice-nucleating particles</title>
      <p id="d1e300">A wealth of recent studies has substantiated early findings from the 1970s
that sea spray aerosol (SSA) particles are able to act as ice-nucleating
particles (INPs) in the immersion freezing mode for clouds in the
mixed-phase temperature regime between 273 and 235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g. Bigg, 1973;
Schnell and Vali, 1975; Knopf et al., 2011; Wilson et al., 2015; DeMott et
al., 2016; Ladino et al., 2016; McCluskey et al., 2017; Creamean et al.,
2019; Irish et al., 2019; Gong et al., 2020; Welti et al., 2020; Wilbourn et
al., 2020; Wolf et al., 2020). As a comprehensive overview of previous
investigations, we recommend the compilation in Table 1 by Ickes et al.
(2020). Immersion freezing in the mixed-phase cloud temperature regime means
that the SSA particles, once activated to cloud droplets, initiate the
heterogeneous nucleation of ice crystals at lesser supercooling than
required for the homogeneous freezing of pure water droplets, which takes
place below about 235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Koop et al., 2000b). The heterogeneous ice
nucleation ability is commonly attributed to the organic material contained
in the SSA particles. Phytoplankton organisms, including algae,
cyanobacteria, and fungi, are the major sources of organic matter in the
ocean (Thornton, 2014; O'Dowd et al., 2015; Middelburg, 2019). Organic
material is often enriched at the thin boundary layer between the ocean and
the atmosphere, called the sea surface microlayer (Cunliffe et al., 2013;
Zäncker et al., 2017), and released into the particle phase by the
bursting of bubbles generated by breaking waves (Blanchard, 1964, 1989;
Leck and Bigg, 2005). Submicron-sized film droplets, resulting from the
fragmentation of the bubble membrane, have been shown to have particularly
high mass fractions of organic matter (O'Dowd et al., 2004; Ault et al.,
2013; Prather et al., 2013). Apart from this marine organic material, it has
recently been proposed that residues from terrestrial dust deposited in
seawater could be ejected by bubble bursting and thereby represent another,
so far unrecognised ice-nucleating entity in SSA particles
(Cornwell et al., 2020).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e322">Alphabetical list of previous ice nucleation measurements with SSA
particles and their proxies at cirrus conditions, specifying the
investigated substances and the employed ice nucleation measurement
techniques.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="55mm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="55mm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Substances</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Techniques</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Alpert et al. (2011a)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Intact and fragmented cells of <italic>Nannochloris atomus</italic> and <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Deposition nucleation: temperature- and humidity-controlled environmental cell with intact diatoms and fragments of diatoms deposited on a hydrophobic surface <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Immersion freezing: aerosol conditioning cell with aqueous NaCl/diatom droplets coupled to cryo-cooling stage</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Alpert et al. (2011b)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Intact and fragmented cells of <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">See Alpert et al. (2011a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Knopf et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Intact and fragmented cells of <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">See Alpert et al. (2011a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kong et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Inorganic sea salt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Spectrometer for Ice Nuclei – Continuous Flow Diffusion Chamber (SPIN–CFDC)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ladino et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Exudates from cultures of <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic>, <italic>Nannochloris atomus</italic>, <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic>, and <italic>Vibrio harveyi</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">University of Toronto – Continuous Flow Diffusion Chamber (UT–CFDC)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Schill and Tolbert (2014)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Inorganic sea salt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Temperature- and humidity-controlled environmental cell equipped with Raman spectrometer</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wagner et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Inorganic sea salt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Expansion cooling in the Aerosol Interaction and Dynamics in the Atmosphere (AIDA) cloud chamber</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wilson et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sea surface microlayer samples from the North Pacific and the British Columbia coastline; exudates from a culture of <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">UT–CFDC for the microlayer samples and immersion freezing technique of Alpert et al. (2011a) for the exudates</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wolf et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Culture of <italic>Prochlorococcus</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SPIN–CFDC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wolf et al. (2020)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sea surface microlayer samples from the eastern tropical North Pacific Ocean and the Florida Straits</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SPIN–CFDC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e501">Previous ice nucleation measurements with SSA particles and their proxies
featured a broad variety of approaches. They included stationary field
studies at coastal sites (e.g. Mason et al., 2015; Ladino et al., 2019;
Wex et al., 2019), ship- and aircraft-based measurements (e.g. McCluskey
et al., 2018a; Hartmann et al., 2020; Welti et al., 2020), as well as
complex laboratory experiments where phytoplankton blooms were simulated in
large seawater tanks and wave channels, generating SSA particles by plunging
sheets of water or breaking waves (e.g. DeMott et al., 2016; McCluskey et
al., 2017, 2018b). Some experiments have specifically
targeted phytoplankton organisms and their exudates (e.g. Alpert et al.,
2011b; Knopf et al., 2011; Ladino et al., 2016; Tesson and Šantl-Temkiv,
2018; Wolf et al., 2019; Ickes et al., 2020), asking whether the ice
nucleation behaviour of these species is representative of that observed for
ambient sea surface microlayer samples. The two ice nucleation measurement
techniques most frequently employed in the literature are droplet freezing
assays and continuous flow diffusion chambers (CFDCs), and the freezing data
are usually reported as the temperature-dependent number of INPs per either
droplet volume or volume of collected air. For ice nucleation measurements
under cirrus conditions (see Sect. 1.2), INP concentrations are reported as
a function of temperature and relative humidity. To quantitatively compare
the ice nucleation ability of the SSA particles with that of particles from
terrestrial sources like mineral dust, some measurements have also been
analysed within the concept of the ice nucleation active surface site
density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the number of INPs is related to the dry aerosol
surface area (Wilson et al., 2015; DeMott et al., 2016; McCluskey et al.,
2017; Ickes et al., 2020). One important finding from these immersion
freezing studies in the mixed-phase cloud temperature regime is that at
least two different ice-nucleating entities in the SSA particles have to be
considered, namely dissolved organic carbon INPs composed of ice-active
molecules and particulate organic carbon INPs including ice-active cells or
cell fragments of marine microorganisms
(McCluskey et al., 2018b). In the course of this
article, we refer to other specific results from these mixed-phase cloud
studies. However, we first want to introduce the topic of our new
measurements, which is the ice nucleation behaviour of SSA particles at
cirrus temperatures below 235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e524">The atmospheric concentration of sea salt exhibits a strong decrease with
altitude, from typically 0.3–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the boundary layer to
less than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Murphy et al., 2019). However, there
is occasional evidence that sea salt particles and airborne microorganisms
can be transported to the upper troposphere by deep convection (Ikegami
et al., 1994; DeLeon-Rodriguez et al., 2013). Aircraft measurements
focussing on the mass-spectrometric analysis of the residual particles from
cirrus crystals showed contributions of up to 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from sea salt over
ocean and coastal regions (Cziczo et al., 2013). In these situations,
mineral dust was the other main component of the ice residuals, suggesting a
heterogeneous ice nucleation pathway for the formation of the cirrus
crystals. Even if the global relevance of SSA particles as INPs in the
cirrus regime turned out to be small, detailed experimental studies on this
subject remain worthwhile if we are to explain regional importance of
heterogeneous ice nucleation activity involving sea salt. The heterogeneous
ice nucleation ability of sea salt particles in the cirrus region has also
been considered as an explanation for the continued removal of sea salt with
altitude even at very low temperatures where all cloud particles consisted
of ice (Murphy et al., 2019). Moreover, from a mechanistic point of view,
it is interesting to compare the heterogeneous ice nucleation ability of the
SSA particles at both mixed-phase cloud and cirrus conditions. As such, some
relevant questions are the following.<?pagebreak page13905?> (1) Do we see indications of multiple biogenic ice-nucleating entities in the SSA particles during the nucleation experiments at cirrus temperatures? (2) Do sea surface microlayer samples
that are particularly ice-active at mixed-phase cloud conditions also show a
superior ice nucleation ability at cirrus temperatures? In contrast to the
large quantity of ice nucleation measurements at mixed-phase cloud
temperatures, far fewer data are available that describe the heterogeneous ice nucleation ability of SSA particles and their proxies at cirrus
temperatures. In the following section, we present a detailed summary of
previous measurements to put our own new laboratory experiments and results
into a broader context. These former studies are listed in Table 1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <label>1.2</label><title>A summary of ice nucleation measurements with SSA particles and
their proxies at cirrus conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e590">Cirrus clouds can either be formed in situ or originate from other cloud
systems like deep convective clouds, where the ice phase is mostly formed
through the supercooled liquid phase
(Krämer et al., 2016). We do not
consider the latter here but focus on in situ cirrus, where ice crystals are directly formed at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">235</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Under these conditions,
heterogeneous ice formation can proceed via different pathways. Ice
nucleation from the supersaturated vapour on the surface of a solid or
highly viscous INP without prior formation of bulk liquid water is called deposition nucleation (Vali et al., 2015). Alternatively,
heterogeneous ice nucleation is referred to as immersion freezing when
ice-nucleating entities are immersed in supercooled aqueous solution
droplets and cause<?pagebreak page13906?> their freezing at lower supersaturation or supercooling
compared to the homogeneous freezing conditions of the pure solution
droplets (Koop et al., 2000b). Note that immersion freezing in this case is different to immersion freezing under mixed-phase cloud conditions
since it occurs below liquid water saturation. Also note that in recent
years, there has been renewed evidence that, in some cases, the deposition nucleation pathway is better described by the pore condensation and freezing
(PCF) mechanism (Fukuta, 1966; Marcolli, 2014; Campbell et al., 2017;
David et al., 2019). The PCF mechanism involves the condensation of
microscopic quantities of water at suitable cracks or pores, which then goes
on to freeze. However, we will continue to use the term “deposition nucleation” on some occasions to be consistent with the cited literature.</p>
      <p id="d1e613">In order to evaluate the available data, a distinction has to be made
between the experimental approach and the initial phase state of the
investigated particles. Three techniques have previously been adopted in
studies that specifically investigated the heterogeneous ice nucleation
behaviour of SSA particles and their proxies at cirrus conditions. The first
type of studies involved deposition nucleation experiments with cells or
cell fragments of the diatom <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic> using a temperature- and humidity-controlled
ice nucleation cell, where the particles were deposited onto silicon wafer
substrates (Knopf et al., 2011). The authors observed that the
intact and fragmented diatoms acted as depositional INPs at temperatures
below 240 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The reported average ice nucleation onsets, as expressed in
terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the saturation ratio with respect to ice, were in the
range from 1.31 to 1.49 at temperatures between 236 and 205 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Alpert et al., 2011a). In the second type of experiment, the same diatom species were probed in the immersion freezing mode, meaning that
the <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic> cells or cell fragments were contained within aqueous NaCl droplets
(Alpert et al., 2011b; Knopf et al., 2011). Here, the authors used an
environmental cell where 40–70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sized droplets that on average contained three diatom cells were deposited on hydrophobic glass slides,
equilibrated to a certain relative humidity (RH), sealed against the
environment, and finally cooled until freezing was detected with an optical
microscope. The composition of the NaCl solution droplets remained constant
during cooling because the amount of water vapour in the environmental cell
was negligible compared to the amount of liquid water in the droplets. In
reference experiments with pure NaCl solution droplets, ice nucleation
onsets for homogeneous freezing were found to be in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range
from 1.46 to 1.51 at temperatures between 234 and 217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the same
temperature range, NaCl droplets containing <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic> cells or cell fragments
nucleated ice at lower saturation ratios from 1.34 to 1.38 due to immersion
freezing. The heterogeneous freezing data were parameterised by a horizontal
shift of the ice melting curve on the water activity scale (Koop
and Zobrist, 2009). It was later shown that the so-derived heterogeneous
freezing curve for <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic> is not only representative of the diatom's intact and broken cells, but also for its exudates, because similar ice nucleation onsets were measured after filtering the diatom culture through a 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> filter (Wilson et al., 2015). As a follow-up of their original ice
nucleation study with <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic>, the authors probed the deposition nucleation and
immersion freezing ability of two other marine algae, namely the green alga
<italic>Nannochloris atomus</italic> and the coccolithophore <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> (Alpert et al., 2011a). In the
immersion freezing experiments, <italic>Nannochloris atomus</italic> behaved similarly to <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic>, showing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
nucleation onsets between 1.36 and 1.42 for temperatures between 234 and 209 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the freezing onsets for <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> were invariant compared to the
homogeneous freezing results for pure NaCl solution droplets. The
variability in the ice nucleation behaviour was attributed to differences in
the cell wall structure and chemical composition between the algal species
(Alpert et al., 2011a). Whereas diatoms and green algae  have
polysaccharide coatings on the outer cell wall structures, there are no such
structures in coccolithophores. Therefore, <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> cells do not have coatings or
layers of potentially ice-active organic material; rather, the cells are covered by calcium carbonate plates. However, in the deposition nucleation
experiments, where other morphological parameters of cell walls, such as
surface outgrowth, cracks, and pores, might control the heterogeneous ice
nucleation efficiency (Marcolli, 2014; David et al., 2019), all
phytoplankton types including <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> showed similar average ice nucleation onsets, as already specified above for <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic>.</p>
      <p id="d1e743">In the third type of experiments, the SSA particles' ice nucleation ability was probed with CFDCs (Wilson et al., 2015; Ladino et al., 2016; Kong et al., 2018; Wolf et al., 2019, 2020). In all of these studies,
particles generated from either sea surface microlayer samples or cultures
of phytoplankton and marine bacterial species in seawater were first dried
to RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before entering the ice-supersaturated region in the CFDC, thereby inducing efflorescence of the inorganic salt constituents
(Koop et al., 2000a). This is important because at cirrus
temperatures, crystalline inorganic salts can also be active as INPs. It is
well known that for pure crystalline salts like ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate, and sodium chloride, there is a temperature-dependent competition
between deliquescence and heterogeneous ice nucleation (e.g. Braban et
al., 2001; Shilling et al., 2006; Eastwood et al., 2009; Wise et al., 2012;
Ladino et al., 2016; Wagner et al., 2020). Above around 225 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
crystalline salt particles first deliquesce and nucleate ice by homogeneous
freezing at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Below that temperature threshold, however,
they become active as INPs in the deposition nucleation mode before reaching
the deliquescence point. In the case of SSA particles that contain not just
a single but a mixture of inorganic salts, deliquescence is a gradual
process. These particles go through partially dissolved states before
finally<?pagebreak page13907?> becoming homogeneous aqueous solution droplets. They begin to
deliquesce at a low RH due to the presence of Ca and Mg salts with low
deliquescence points, but only at about 74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> RH (298 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is all of the
remaining NaCl dissolved and the particles transformed to homogeneous droplets (Tang et al., 1997). Microscope images showed that the particle
habit of an initially dry, irregularly shaped sea salt particle changed to an overall spherical outline as the humidity was increased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at 215 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Schill and Tolbert, 2014). At these conditions,
the particle consisted of a brine layer of highly dissolvable salt
components like <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">KMgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> around a
solid core of yet undissolved salts, predominantly NaCl as the main
component of sea salt. The two potential ice nucleation pathways for such an
internally mixed solid–liquid particle upon further increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are (i) full particle deliquescence followed by homogeneous freezing or (ii) immersion freezing due to the undissolved crystalline core before
reaching the point of full deliquescence. The second process has also been
termed “deliquescent-heterogeneous freezing” in the literature (Khvorostyanov and Curry, 2004). Three independent laboratory studies have
shown that below a threshold temperature of about 220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the partly
deliquesced SSA particles became active as INPs in the immersion freezing
mode (Schill and Tolbert, 2014; Kong et al., 2018; Wagner et al., 2018).
Specifically, the temperature-dependent ice nucleation measurements in the
Aerosol Interaction and Dynamics in the Atmosphere (AIDA) cloud chamber
yielded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> freezing onsets between 1.24 and 1.42 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">220</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are
similar in magnitude to those inferred for desert dust
(Wagner et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e956">Due to the intrinsic heterogeneous ice nucleation ability of purely
inorganic, partly deliquesced sea salt particles below 220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the CFDC ice
nucleation measurements with the aerosolised sea surface microlayer samples
as well as algal and bacterial cultures were primarily conducted between 235
and 220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in order to explore whether the additional biogenic organic
constituents induced heterogeneous ice formation in the temperature range
where the inorganic salt components are not yet ice-active entities. Ladino
et al. (2016) probed the ice nucleation ability of the exudates of the three
phytoplankton species <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic>, <italic>Nannochloris atomus</italic>, and <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> as well as the marine bacterium <italic>Vibrio harveyi</italic> at 233 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the University of Toronto (UT)–CFDC. The exudates were separated from
the cells with 0.1, 0.2, and 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> membrane filters to remove cell
debris. The filtered solutions were aerosolised with an atomiser, and dried, 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sized particles were selected for the CFDC measurements. The exudate
particles only revealed a small heterogeneous freezing mode that was
independent of the pore size of the filter, indicating that the
ice-nucleating entities were smaller than 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in size. The
heterogeneous freezing onsets were very low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), but the
ice-active particle fraction was only in the range between 0.001 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until reaching <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the homogeneous freezing
mode became apparent. Another phytoplankton species, the cyanobacterium
<italic>Prochlorococcus</italic>, was probed on its ice nucleation ability with the Spectrometer for Ice
Nuclei (SPIN)–CFDC (Wolf et al., 2019). Here, the seawater solution with
the cell cultures (average concentration about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was aerosolised with a glass frit bubbler. Without prior
treatment, the organic carbon content of the generated particles, as
measured with an aerosol mass spectrometer, was very low and indicated that
the 0.5–0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sized <italic>Prochlorococcus</italic> cells were not efficiently aerosolised. Concomitantly, ice formation by these particles at 227 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> only initiated at
the homogeneous freezing level. The organic carbon content and ice
nucleation behaviour strongly changed when the cell cultures were treated by
sonication prior to aerosolisation, causing the destruction of the outer
cell membranes and releasing intracellular organic material (cell lysis).
The increase in the organic carbon content after cell lysis was particularly
pronounced for smaller particle sizes (200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sized particles
proved to be very efficient INPs, with ice-active fractions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> densities that
were similar in magnitude to those of other common INPs like mineral and
soil dust (Wolf et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e1190">Two further CFDC ice nucleation studies have investigated field-collected
sea surface microlayer samples. Wilson et al. (2015) probed a variety of
microlayer samples from the North Pacific and the British Columbia
coastline. The samples were aerosolised with an atomiser, and the ice
nucleation behaviour of dried, 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sized particles was investigated at
233 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the UT–CFDC. The aerosol particles generated from the microlayer samples nucleated ice heterogeneously, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> onsets varying between
1.15 and 1.33 (representative of an ice-active fraction of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). It was
found that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> densities of the microlayer samples at 233 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were typically around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
about 1 order of magnitude larger than data for kaolinite, feldspar, and Arizona Test Dust particles (Wilson et al., 2015). Most recently, Wolf et al. (2020) collected sea surface microlayer samples in the eastern tropical North Pacific Ocean and the Florida Straits. The seawater samples
were aerosolised with an atomiser, and dried, 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sized particles were probed on their ice nucleation ability with the SPIN–CFDC. In agreement with the measurements by Wilson et al. (2015), the aerosol particles generated
from these microlayer samples also proved to be effective INPs, with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nucleation onsets for a 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activated fraction ranging between
1.14 and 1.38 at temperatures between 227 and 231 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS3">
  <label>1.3</label><title>Motivation for a new set of ice nucleation measurements at cirrus conditions in the AIDA cloud chamber</title>
      <p id="d1e1336">The available data allow the following preliminary conclusions regarding the
ice nucleation behaviour of SSA particles and their proxies at cirrus
temperatures. The heterogeneous ice nucleation experiments with the
phytoplankton<?pagebreak page13908?> species mostly show a moderate reduction of the homogeneous
freezing level to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> onsets typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Notable exceptions
are the very low onsets reported by Ladino et al. (2016) for the
phytoplankton exudates and the high ice nucleation efficiency of the
<italic>Prochlorococcus</italic> culture after sonication (Wolf et al., 2019). However, the very low
onsets reported by Ladino et al. (2016) for the phytoplankton exudates were
only representative of less than 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the particle ensemble. The particles generated from ambient sea surface microlayer samples by Wilson et
al. (2015) and Wolf et al. (2020) typically nucleated ice well below the
homogeneous freezing threshold, partly yielding an ice-active fraction of
1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> already at a saturation ratio as low as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. They also
revealed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values that were larger than those of various types of dust
particles. On the one hand, these results are reminiscent of recent
laboratory experiments in the mixed-phase cloud temperature regime, showing
that actively growing algal cultures do not sufficiently explain the ice
nucleation activity inherent in some microlayer samples
(Ickes et al., 2020). On
the other hand, the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the particles generated from the
microlayer samples in relation to dust at temperatures between 220 and 235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are in contrast to results at mixed-phase cloud temperatures, where the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of SSA particles were reported to be typically 2 to 3 orders of magnitude lower than those of mineral and soil dust (DeMott et
al., 2016). In this study we provide another data set of ice nucleation
measurements with particles generated from field-collected sea surface
microlayer and surface seawater samples at cirrus temperatures in order to
investigate whether the Wilson et al. (2015) and Wolf et al. (2020) data are
indeed a representative measure for the particles' ice nucleation ability or
whether, similar to the lesson learned from the large number of studies at
mixed-phase cloud temperatures, we need to consider a much higher diversity
in the particles' ice nucleation behaviour. There are three new aspects in
our study. Firstly, we have focussed on a different geographical region,
using seawater samples from three different locations in the Arctic (eastern Canadian Arctic, Greenland Sea, and the glacial fjord Kongsfjorden in
Svalbard). Secondly, we have probed another common marine phytoplankton
species, the diatom <italic>Skeletonema marinoi</italic>, whose ice nucleation behaviour has not yet been
investigated at cirrus conditions. Thirdly, we have used a different
technique for the ice nucleation measurements by performing moderate
expansion cooling experiments in the AIDA cloud chamber. At low
temperatures, organic-rich SSA particles could be highly viscous, and
kinetic limitations of water diffusion into the particles could strongly
affect the ice nucleation pathways (Berkemeier et al., 2014; Lienhard et
al., 2015; Price et al., 2015; Fowler et al., 2020). During an AIDA
expansion experiment, the particles have more time to adjust to changes in
the RH compared to the short residence time in a CFDC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and tools of optical measurement techniques like infrared spectroscopy as well as light scattering and depolarisation measurements are
available to analyse the particles' phase state during expansion cooling.</p>
      <p id="d1e1460">Our article is organised as follows. Section 2 describes the collection and
preparation of the seawater samples and the diatom culture (Sect. 2.1) as
well as the aerosol particle generation (Sect. 2.2) and the technical
details of the ice nucleation measurements (Sect. 2.3). As the central part
of our article, Sect. 3 summarises the results of the ice nucleation
experiments. Before addressing in detail the experiments under cirrus
conditions, we present a short summary of the freezing behaviour of the bulk
solutions in the mixed-phase cloud temperature region as measured with a
cold-stage instrument (Sect. 3.1). In doing so, we can assess whether the
range of freezing temperatures of our seawater samples is representative of
that from previous studies in the mixed-phase cloud region. After
aerosolisation of the bulk samples, we tested the particles' ice nucleation
behaviour at two different cirrus temperatures in the AIDA chamber, namely
at 229 and 217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At 229 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the inorganic salt constituents of the seawater
samples did not act as ice-nucleating entities, and we could selectively probe the potential heterogeneous ice nucleation ability of the biogenic
organic components (Sect. 3.2.1). At 217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the inorganic salt constituents
(only partially deliquesced) were efficient INPs, and we could investigate
whether this behaviour was altered by the additional organic constituents in
the seawater samples and the diatom culture (Sect. 3.2.2). In Sect. 4, we
discuss our findings in the context of the previous measurements summarised
in Sect. 1.2 and present suggestions for future investigations.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1490">Overview of the investigated samples, specifying the sampling
location, sampling time, and coordinates. The last column denotes the median
equal-volume sphere diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of the particles that were generated
by nebulising the bulk solutions and then injected into the AIDA chamber for the ice nucleation experiments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sampling time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UTC</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Coordinates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">STN1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Canadian Arctic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20 July 2016, 16:30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>17.921<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 62<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10.750<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">STN2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Canadian Arctic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29 July 2016, 15:30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>23.466<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 63<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>22.067<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">STN7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Canadian Arctic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11 August 2016, 17:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>47.213<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 76<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>29.841<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SML6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Greenland Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22 July 2013, 08:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>06.340<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>06.120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SML10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Greenland Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">26 July 2013, 14:24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">76<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>16.141<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>18.642<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SML12.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Greenland Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29 July 2013, 08:50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>27.207<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>13.610<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SML13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Greenland Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30 July 2013, 12:01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>48.828<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 07<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>35.043<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kongsfjorden</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 July 2017, 12:44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>55.556<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>02.496<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kongsfjorden</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 July 2017, 12:58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>55.508<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>03.282<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kongsfjorden</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 July 2017, 12:10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>55.447<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>03.994<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kongsfjorden</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 July 2017, 13:18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>55.381<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>04.435<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kongsfjorden</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 July 2017, 13:27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>55.366<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>04.883<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SM100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Laboratory sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sample collection and preparation</title>
      <p id="d1e2259">We have probed seawater samples from three Arctic locations. The sea surface
microlayer samples from the eastern Canadian Arctic and the Greenland Sea were collected with the glass plate technique during NETCARE (Irish et
al., 2019) and from a hydrophilic Teflon film on a rotating drum during
ACCACIA (Wilson et al., 2015) field expeditions, respectively, and some
of them were already used in previous AIDA ice nucleation measurements that
focussed on the mixed-phase cloud temperature region
(Ickes et al., 2020). The
seawater samples from Kongsfjorden were collected during rough sea
conditions with a Niskin sampler placed horizontally on the water surface.
Therefore, we use the term “surface seawater samples”. These samples
likely contained neuston and non-living material present in the surface
microlayer, but this material will have been heavily diluted with subsurface
water both due to the sampling technique and the weather conditions. A
closer description of the Kongsfjorden sampling site, the meteorological
conditions during sampling, and the analysis of the aquatic chemistry and
bacterial abundance of these samples is presented in<?pagebreak page13909?> Appendix A. For
pertinent details regarding the NETCARE and ACCACIA samples, we refer to the cited literature. All investigated samples are listed in Table 2. To ensure
their unique identification, we labelled the NETCARE and ACCACIA samples
with the abbreviations STN and SML, respectively, as used in the original
publications. The acronym KFJ was used for the Kongsfjorden samples. The
measurements presented in this article were conducted during September and
October 2017.</p>
      <p id="d1e2262">In addition to the microlayer samples, we used a laboratory-grown culture of
<italic>Skeletonema marinoi</italic>, a widespread marine diatom that often dominates spring blooms in coastal
waters (Kooistra et al., 2008; Johansson et al., 2019; Stenow et al.,
2020). Its cell wall morphology is similar to that in <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic>, both of which
feature layers of polysaccharides, including glucan, in the outer part of their cell walls, known as exopolymeric substances
(Hoagland et al., 1993). We have already probed
the ice nucleation ability of <italic>Skeletonema marinoi</italic> (strain number CCAP 1077/5 from the
Gothenburg University Marine Algal Culture Collection) at mixed-phase cloud
temperatures in the AIDA chamber and used the same strain to produce a new stock for the present measurements at cirrus conditions according to the
procedure described by Ickes et al. (2020). We called this sample SM100
(Table 2), where the number refers to a nutrient saturation of 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
during algal growth (Ickes
et al., 2020). The cell concentration, as measured with the cell counter
TC20 (Bio-Rad), reached a density of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
addition to this concentrated SM100 culture, we prepared a diluted algal
suspension (SM100_dil) with a dilution factor of 50, using a
3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution of a synthetic sea salt mixture (Sigma-Aldrich, product
number S9883) in ultrapure water (GenPure Pro UV ultrapure water system,
Thermo Scientific) as diluting agent. The cell concentration in
SM100_dil is representative of an abundance peak observed
during a strong spring bloom (Saravanan and Godhe, 2010).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2327">Number size distributions of aerosol particles generated by
nebulising the STN1, SML13, KFJ2, and SM100 bulk solutions. The size spectra
were measured at 298 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, thereby reflecting the dry
particle diameters. The mobility and aerodynamic diameters from the SMPS and
APS measurements were converted into the equal-volume sphere diameter,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, by assuming a dynamic shape factor of 1.08 (Hinds, 1999) and a
particle density of 2.017 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for sea salt (Zieger et al., 2017).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/13903/2021/acp-21-13903-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Aerosol particle generation and characterisation</title>
      <?pagebreak page13910?><p id="d1e2398">For the ice nucleation measurements in the AIDA chamber, the seawater
samples and the SM100 cultures were thawed, homogenised by shaking, and
aerosolised with an ultrasonic nebuliser (GA2400, SinapTec). After passing
through a pair of silica gel diffusion dryers that reduced the ambient RH to
less than 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the particles were injected into the cooled AIDA chamber.
Four representative number size distributions of the dried particles are
shown in Fig. 1.
They result from the combination of the size spectra of a
scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS, TSI, mobility diameter range: 0.014–0.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and an aerodynamic particle spectrometer (APS, TSI,
aerodynamic diameter range: 0.523–19.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The nebuliser produced
uniform distributions with median particle diameters centred between 0.65
and 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as summarised in the last column of Table 2. We note that
nebulisation is a convenient technique to produce sufficient particle
numbers to fill the large volume of the AIDA chamber (84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a
reasonable amount of time. The typical injection period was 20–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
yielding a final aerosol particle number concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>aer</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of about
500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as measured with a condensation particle counter (CPC, TSI).
However, nebulisation is not a process that mimics the natural sea spray
production mechanism. Regarding the field-collected oceanic surface water
samples, one drawback of this technique might be that aerosolisation of the
well-mixed microlayer and surface seawater suspensions in the nebuliser does
not account for the formation of small film droplets from bursting bubble
caps, which can be particularly enriched in organic material (O'Dowd et al., 2004; Ault et al., 2013; Prather et al., 2013). Nonetheless, the
experiments with the particles generated by nebulising the undiluted
microlayer and surface seawater samples should yield a good estimate of the
average ice nucleation ability of the organic entities contained in them.
Regarding the SM100 culture, we have to consider two aspects. Firstly, we
have strong indications from the measurements during our previous ice
nucleation experiments at mixed-phase cloud temperatures that neither intact
cells nor fragments of <italic>Skeletonema marinoi</italic> cells were efficiently transferred from the bulk to
the particle phase by nebulisation
(Ickes et al., 2020).
Electron microscope images of particles that were generated by nebulising
the SM100 culture did not show any evidence of such intact cells or cellular
debris. Therefore, we expect that any observed heterogeneous ice nucleation
activity of SM100 is primarily related to its exopolymeric secretions. Secondly, in Ickes et al. (2020) we compared the median freezing temperature
of droplets pipetted directly from the SM100 culture to that of droplets
pipetted from the condensate that was collected from the outflow of the
ultrasonic nebuliser. Nebulisation increased the median freezing temperature
of SM100 by about 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, presumably due to the vigorous mechanical action
that facilitated the detachment of exopolymeric substances from the cell
surface or led to the disruption of cells or cell agglomerates and enhanced
the release of ice-active intracellular components into the solution. A
similar explanation was given by Wolf et al. (2019) regarding the strong
effect of sonication on the ice nucleation activity of <italic>Prochlorococcus</italic>. Therefore, we
expect that the ice nucleation experiments with the particles from the
nebulised SM100 culture were likely more representative of an aged
phytoplankton bloom under stress conditions like phage and viral infections, oxidative and osmotic stress, and toxins, i.e. processes that increase organic matter exudation during bloom breakdown (Mühlenbruch et al., 2018). In contrast, the freezing
measurements with droplets pipetted directly from the SM100 culture
represent actively grown diatoms under balanced, light- and nutrient-replete
conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Ice nucleation measurement techniques</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>The cold-stage instrument INSEKT</title>
      <p id="d1e2521">In order to confirm that the sea surface microlayer and surface seawater
samples as well as the SM100 culture contained ice-active entities for
inducing heterogeneous freezing in the mixed-phase cloud temperature regime,
we investigated the freezing behaviour of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L aliquots pipetted from
the bulk samples in the cold-stage instrument INSEKT (Ice Nucleation
Spectrometer of the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
(Schneider et al., 2021).
INSEKT is a custom-made version of an apparatus developed at Colorado State University, known in the literature as the “CSU Ice Spectrometer”
(Hill et al., 2016). The aliquots were pipetted into two sterile 96-well
polypropylene PCR trays. These trays were then fitted into two
ethanol-cooled aluminium blocks, whose temperature was linearly reduced at a
rate of 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until all aliquots were frozen. The basic measure of
INSEKT was the freezing temperature of each individual aliquot. Freezing
induced a brightness change in the suspensions in the wells which was detected by a camera mounted above the aluminium blocks. By dividing the
temperature-dependent number of frozen aliquots through the total number of
aliquots, the fraction frozen (FF) curve throughout the temperature ramp was
calculated. The FF curves were corrected for the freezing point depression
caused by the salts to derive the hypothetical freezing temperature in pure
water according to the procedure described by Wilson et al. (2015) and Irish
et al. (2019). From the FF curves, we computed the cumulative concentration of
INPs per sample volume, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, according to Eq. (1) (Vali,
1971):

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M168" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>FF</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>aliquot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2609">For a subset of samples, we diluted the suspensions by factors of 10 and 100 with ultrapure water to extend the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrum to lower
freezing temperatures and higher cumulative INP concentrations. Thereby, we
achieved a better overlap with other cold-stage measurements in which
smaller aliquot volumes of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L were used (Wilson et al., 2015; Irish
et al. 2019). The FF curve of ultrapure water was additionally measured as a
reference.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>The aerosol and cloud chamber AIDA</title>
      <p id="d1e2645">The ice nucleation experiments at cirrus conditions were conducted in the
aerosol and cloud chamber AIDA of the<?pagebreak page13911?> Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. The
operation of the AIDA chamber has been described in detail in a large number
of publications, but we want to specifically refer to its description in our
study on the ice nucleation behaviour of purely inorganic sea salt particles
at cirrus temperatures (Wagner et al., 2018), because the
modus operandi in that work was essentially the same as in our current
study. Briefly, the AIDA chamber is an 84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sized aluminium chamber
that is housed in an isolating, temperature-controlled box whose interior
can be cooled to a minimum temperature of about 183 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We determined the
mean AIDA gas temperature by averaging the measurements from a vertical
array of thermocouple sensors with an estimated uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We quantified the relative humidity of the chamber air by measuring the
intensity profile of a rotational–vibrational water vapour absorption line at 1.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a tuneable diode laser spectrometer
(Fahey et al., 2014).
This measurement was performed in situ and specifically yielded the
interstitial water vapour concentration bare of any contribution from
condensed or frozen water contained in aerosol and/or cloud particles. The
measured water vapour partial pressure was divided by the saturation water
vapour pressures over ice and supercooled liquid water to compute the
respective saturation ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>liq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an uncertainty of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Murphy and Koop, 2005).</p>
      <p id="d1e2736">For the injection of the aerosol particles generated from the seawater
samples and the SM100 culture, the AIDA chamber was conditioned to almost
ice-saturated conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as controlled by a coating
layer of ice on the inner chamber walls. To achieve ice-supersaturated
conditions and induce the formation of ice crystals by either homogeneous or
heterogeneous nucleation, we performed an expansion cooling experiment by
reducing the chamber pressure from typically 1000 to 850 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The number
concentration of the nucleated ice crystals in the course of the expansion
cooling run, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was inferred from the records of two optical particle
counters (OPCs, type welas, Palas GmbH, size range 0.7–240 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
ice crystals rapidly grew to sizes larger than those of the seed aerosol
particles, so that it was convenient to define an optical threshold size of
about 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and to selectively classify and count all particles above
that size as ice crystals. By dividing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>aer</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we computed the ice-active fraction of the aerosol particle population, FF, and
by further dividing FF by the average dry particle surface area, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>aer</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as obtained from the size distribution measurements (Fig. 1), we
calculated the ice nucleation active surface site density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using error propagation with individual uncertainties of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
well as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>aer</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>aer</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ullrich et al.,
2017). As will be shown in Sect. 3.2, the FF was always so low that the linear
approximation in computing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was valid (Niemand et al., 2012). To
provide an estimate of the lower detection limit with respect to FF and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the AIDA expansion cooling experiments, we consider the lower
limit case that the OPCs would only detect one single ice crystal during a
measurement period of 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on the sampling flow rate and the
cross-sectional area of the welas OPC sensors, this would correspond to an
ice particle number concentration of about 0.005 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. With <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>aer</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
typically being <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sect. 2.2), the FF would be
about 0.001 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Given this and a typical value of
2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>aer</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the lower detection limit in terms of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3107">Apart from the basic instrumentation described above, we used infrared
extinction as well as light scattering and depolarisation measurements to
probe the phase state of the added aerosol particles and to detect possible
phase changes during expansion cooling. Infrared extinction spectra of the
aerosol particles were recorded in situ from 6000 to 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution with a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR,
model IFS66v, Bruker) that was coupled to a multiple-reflection cell of 166.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> path length (Wagner et al., 2006). With the
so-called SIMONE instrument, we measured the light scattering intensities of the aerosol and cloud particles in the AIDA chamber at 2 and
178<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scattering angles (Schnaiter et al.,
2012). At 178<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,  the scattered light intensity was detected
polarisation-resolved, enabling the computation of the backscattering linear
depolarisation ratio, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The use and interplay of all employed
measurement techniques will be outlined in greater detail in Sect. 3.2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3176"><bold>(a)</bold> Frozen fraction, FF, curves of the investigated samples from
cold-stage measurements with INSEKT, corrected for the freezing point
depression by the salts. <bold>(b)</bold> Cumulative INP concentrations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as computed with Eq. (1) from the measurements in panel <bold>(a)</bold> and
additional INSEKT measurements where the solutions were diluted by factors of 10 and 100 with ultrapure water to extend their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
spectrum to lower temperatures. The error bars reflect the statistical
uncertainty (Koop et al., 1997). The coloured horizontal bars, positioned
at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (shown with a slight vertical
offset as a matter of clarity), comprise the range of temperatures where
such INP concentrations were encountered in previous droplet freezing
experiments with Arctic microlayer samples (Wilson et al., 2015; Irish et
al., 2017, 2019).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/13903/2021/acp-21-13903-2021-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results of the ice nucleation measurements</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>INSEKT cold-stage measurements at mixed-phase cloud temperatures</title>
      <p id="d1e3304">A summary of the freezing experiments with the cold-stage instrument INSEKT
is shown in Fig. 2. Panel (a) shows the temperature-dependent FF curves for
all investigated samples, corrected for the freezing point depression by the
salts (see Sect. 2.3.1). The data are colour-coded with respect to the
sampling location (magenta: STN samples from the Canadian Arctic, red: SML
samples from the Greenland Sea, blue: KFJ samples from Kongsfjorden, green:
SM100 culture, and grey: background measurement with ultrapure water). The
median freezing temperatures, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (corresponding to a FF of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), of the field samples encompassed a range between 265.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (STN2, the most
ice-active sample) and 256.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (STN1, the least ice-active sample). The
relative activity within the subset of STN samples, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(STN2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(STN7) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(STN1), is in good agreement
with the results from the original droplet freezing measurements with these solutions presented in Irish et al. (2019). The same is true for the SML samples, where we confirmed the relative order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(SML12.5) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(SML6) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(SML10) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(SML13) from Wilson et al. (2015). In the next paragraph, we present
a quantitative comparison of the data which takes into account the different
aliquot volumes of the respective measurements (50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L in our study and
1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L in Irish et al., 2019, and Wilson et al., 2015). The five<?pagebreak page13912?> individual samples from Kongsfjorden show little variation in their
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranging from 261.9 to 263.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This may be partly explained by the
strong dilution with subsurface waters, leading to a homogenisation of the
KFJ surface seawater samples in comparison with the higher degree of
variability observed for the SML and STN microlayer samples. The activity of
the SM100 culture was less than any of the field samples, but its <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
254.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was still almost 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than the blank measurement with
ultrapure water. As already briefly discussed in Sect. 2.2, mechanical
forces induced by nebulisation increased the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of SM100 by 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
our previous study (Ickes
et al., 2020). It is therefore conceivable that the generally higher ice
nucleation activity of the field samples in relation to the untreated SM100
culture could be due to aging processes that have led to the break-up of
phytoplankton and to the dispersal of efficient ice-nucleating entities from
intracellular material. What controls the large variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
within the field samples is still an outstanding question. Regarding the STN
sampling location, a negative correlation between the freezing temperature
and the salinity of the samples was found. Irish et al. (2019) argued that
the lower salinity might be connected to sea ice melt and terrestrial
run-off, i.e. processes that could increase the number of efficient ice-nucleating entities like microorganisms and their exudates in the
seawater.</p>
      <p id="d1e3524">In Fig. 2b, we present the cumulative INP concentrations as a function of
temperature for our samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Eq. 1). For all samples except STN2, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> traces were merged from at least two independent
measurements, (i) with the undiluted samples and (ii) with the samples diluted by a factor of 10 with ultrapure water to reduce the concentration
of INPs and shift the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrum to lower freezing temperatures.
Due to the similarity of the freezing behaviour within the set of the
Kongsfjorden samples, we only included two exemplary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curves for
KFJ2 and KFJ5 in Fig. 2b. Here, we additionally performed measurements with
the solutions diluted by a factor of 100. For comparison, coloured
horizontal bars indicate the range of temperatures where the individual
microlayer samples from the collections probed by Irish et al. (2017)
(black), Irish et al. (2019) (green), and Wilson et al. (2015) (orange)
showed INP concentrations of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The comparison indicates that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curves from our new INSEKT
measurements nicely fall into the range of previous droplet freezing measurements that comprised a large variety of Arctic microlayer samples.
For the STN and SML samples which have been re-measured with INSEKT after
long-term storage of the frozen solutions at 193 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we did not detect any
pronounced alterations of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrum with respect to the
original measurements. For example, the re-measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curve of
STN2, our most active microlayer sample, was shifted by only about 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
lower temperatures in comparison with the original measurement (Irish et
al., 2019). This deviation can also be explained by the combined
uncertainties of the two measurements and differences in the applied
procedures, e.g. with respect to the cooling rate. In spite of their dilution with subsurface water, the KFJ samples still contain a substantial INP
concentration at high freezing temperatures above 260 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the slope
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lines for the KFJ surface seawater samples tends to be
flatter compared to that of the STN and SML microlayer samples, which might
be due to the dilution effect. In summary, the INSEKT cold-stage
measurements suggest that our samples in their entirety are a representative
cross section of the heterogeneous ice nucleation ability typically shown by Arctic microlayer suspensions at mixed-phase cloud temperatures. In the
following section, we investigate the ice nucleation ability of aerosol
particles generated from the bulk solutions at cirrus conditions in the AIDA
chamber.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3723">Time series of the AIDA records from the expansion cooling
experiments started at 229 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for six different samples <bold>(a–f)</bold>. The sample
called “blank” refers to a commercial bulk Atlantic water sample that has
already previously been probed in the AIDA chamber (Wagner
et al., 2018). The four individual panels for each part show the following
data: I: AIDA mean gas temperature (red line) and pressure (black line); II:
saturation ratios with respect to ice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, brown line) and supercooled
water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>liq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, magenta line); III: size-resolved single-particle
scattering signals from the optical particle counter (green dots); IV:
forward-scattering intensity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>for</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> scattering angle, grey line) and backscattering linear depolarisation ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, 178<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> scattering angle, blue line). The blue horizontal bar in
panel IV of Fig. 3b symbolises the time period where the series of FTIR
spectra shown in Fig. 4 were recorded. See text for details.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/13903/2021/acp-21-13903-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3805">Series of infrared extinction spectra that were recorded in the
first 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the expansion run with the particles generated from the
SM100 culture (see Fig. 3b). The broad peak between about 3500 and 2800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is due to the O–H stretching mode of liquid water. As described
in the text, this spectra series is representative of all measurements with the various samples and is therefore also used to discuss the hygroscopic
behaviour of the particles from the bulk Atlantic water sample in Sect.
3.2.1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/13903/2021/acp-21-13903-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3839">Quantitative analysis of the AIDA expansion cooling runs started at
229 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As discussed in the text, the observed heterogeneous ice nucleation
modes were separated into two nucleation ranges: (i) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.38 and (ii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.48. For both ranges, the maximum values
of the ice-active fraction of the aerosol particles, FF, and the ice
nucleation active surface site density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, were evaluated. The last
column summarises the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> freezing temperatures from the cold-stage
freezing measurements with 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L aliquots of the bulk solutions.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Nucleation range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.38 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Nucleation range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.48 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Bulk freezing</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">FF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">STN1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">256.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">STN2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">265.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">STN7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">260.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SML6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">263.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SML10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">261.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SML12.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">263.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SML13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">258.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">263.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">262.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">261.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">262.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">262.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SM100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">254.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SM100_dil</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page13913?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>AIDA cloud chamber measurements at cirrus conditions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Start temperature 229\,{$\unit{{K}}$}, where inorganic salts do not
contribute to heterogeneous ice formation
}?><title>Start temperature 229 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where inorganic salts do not
contribute to heterogeneous ice formation
</title>
      <?pagebreak page13914?><p id="d1e4492">We first focus on the expansion cooling experiments started at about 229 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Similar to the droplet freezing experiments in the mixed-phase cloud
temperature regime, any observable heterogeneous ice nucleation mode must be
related to organic material or other ice-nucleating entities like dust
contained in the aerosol particles, because the inorganic salt components
are not yet ice-active at this temperature. In Fig. 3, we provide an
overview of the ice nucleation ability of our samples by showing the AIDA
records from six individual expansion cooling runs. For each experiment, the
time series of the AIDA data are divided into four different panels: I: AIDA mean gas temperature (red line) and pressure (black line); II: saturation
ratios with respect to ice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, brown line) and supercooled water
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>liq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, magenta line); III: size-resolved single-particle scattering
signals from the optical particle counter (green dots); IV: forward-scattering intensity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>for</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> scattering angle, grey line)
and backscattering linear depolarisation ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, 178<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
scattering angle, blue line) from the SIMONE measurements. The start of
pumping is set to time zero. Vertical dashed lines indicate prominent events
during the expansion runs like particle deliquescence as well as
heterogeneous and homogeneous ice nucleation onsets. Green markings in
panels III of Fig. 3b, d, and f direct the eye to small heterogeneous ice
nucleation modes. Additionally, Fig. 4 shows a series of FTIR spectra that
were recorded in the initial 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the expansion run with the
particles generated from the SM100 sample (one spectrum every 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
as indicated by the horizontal blue bar in panel IV of Fig. 3b. This time
period covers the full deliquescence step of the internally mixed
solid–liquid particles (see discussion below). The behaviour evident in Fig. 4 is representative of all conducted experiments and, therefore, the FTIR
spectra are only displayed once.</p>
      <?pagebreak page13915?><p id="d1e4578">Figure 3a shows the previously measured ice nucleation behaviour of
particles generated from a commercially available bulk Atlantic water sample
(data from Fig. 6, upper left panel, of Wagner et al., 2018). We consider
this measurement as the blank experiment for the intrinsic ice nucleation
behaviour of purely inorganic SSA particles when probed in an expansion
cooling run started at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">229</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The same behaviour as
displayed in Fig. 3a was also observed when using a solution of the
synthetic Sigma-Aldrich sea salt mixture for particle generation
(Wagner et al., 2018). It is important to note that we have
mimicked the procedure of the previous CFDC ice nucleation measurements with
sea surface microlayer samples and have dried the aerosol particles from the
outlet of the nebuliser before injecting them into the AIDA chamber. The
hygroscopic behaviour and the phase change of the particles upon injection
and during the initial time period of the expansion run are revealed by the
SIMONE measurements (Fig. 3a, panel IV) and the representative FTIR records
shown in Fig. 4. In a similar experiment with dried NaCl particles of the
same size, the depolarisation ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the added crystals was about 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the concomitant FTIR spectrum did not show any signature of liquid water (Wagner et al., 2018). In contrast, after
injecting the dried particles from the bulk Atlantic water sample into the
AIDA chamber at 229 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nearly ice-saturated conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was
only about 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the characteristic liquid water absorption bands were
clearly visible in the infrared extinction measurement, e.g. in the
wavenumber region between 3500 and 2800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> related to the O–H
stretching mode (lowermost spectrum in Fig. 4 recorded at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In
agreement with the results of Schill and Tolbert (2014), the particles were
thus in an internally mixed solid–liquid state, with a brine layer of dissolved salts surrounding the solid NaCl core. Even with a spherical outline, such particles are still inhomogeneous from the viewpoint of light
scattering and caused the small residual depolarisation of 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Sun et al., 2011). During the first 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the expansion
run, the liquid layer of the particles slightly grew through the uptake of
water vapour from the gas phase as a result of the increasing relative
humidity. This led to a small reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, a slight increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>for</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to particle growth by the water uptake, and a small increase in
the intensity of the liquid water absorption bands in the FTIR spectra. At
about 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (first vertical line in Fig. 3a), these smooth variations turned
into a sudden, stepwise increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>for</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and, simultaneously, a strong growth of the liquid water absorption band intensities in the FTIR spectra
was detectable. Also, the scattering contribution to the infrared extinction spectra at wavenumbers <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> strongly increased due to
the growth of the particles caused by water uptake. At these conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>liq</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), we had reached the full
deliquescence point of the sea salt particles (Koop et al.,
2000a). The internally mixed solid–liquid particles underwent a phase transition to homogeneously mixed aqueous solution droplets, for which the
depolarisation ratio finally dropped to the background value of zero. Ice
nucleation by the solution droplets in the further course of the expansion
run occurred at the homogeneous freezing level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, second
vertical line in Fig. 3b). The formation of ice crystals was indicated by
the appearance of the mode of big particles in the OPC records at sizes
larger than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the further strong increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>for</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the renewed increase in the depolarisation ratio due to the presence of
aspherical ice particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e4830">How did the ice nucleation behaviour change when the sea salt aerosol
particles contained additional organic components? In Fig. 3b, we show the
AIDA records from the expansion run with the particles generated from the
undiluted SM100 culture with a concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Just at the onset of the full deliquescence step (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, first vertical line), we detected a very small
heterogeneous ice nucleation mode with an activated fraction, FF, of
0.003 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The few nucleated ice crystals are highlighted by the green
circle in panel III. A much stronger immersion freezing mode was observed in
closer proximity to the homogeneous freezing threshold, starting at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (second vertical line). Here, a maximum activated fraction
of 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed before the onset of the homogeneous freezing mode at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> led to a further increase in the ice particle number concentration (third vertical line). The two independent ice nucleation
modes that started at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (immersion freezing) and 1.48
(homogeneous freezing) can clearly be seen by the two stepwise changes in
the time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>for</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (panel IV). Diluting the SM100
culture by a factor of 50 strongly decreased the magnitude of the
heterogeneous freezing modes, with the first mode at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
completely disappearing and the second mode at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduced to a
FF of 0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3c).</p>
      <p id="d1e5000">The AIDA records of three exemplary expansion cooling runs with particles
generated from the microlayer and surface seawater samples STN2, SML13, and
KFJ4 support the finding from the experiment with SM100 that there are two
distinct regimes where a heterogeneous ice nucleation activity becomes
apparent (Fig. 3d, e, and f). The particles generated from the STN2 sample
showed ice formation in both regimes, i.e. the early, weak immersion freezing mode starting at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (first vertical line in Fig. 3d,
nucleated ice crystals again highlighted by the green marking in panel III)
as well as the later, more pronounced nucleation mode in the range
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.48 (i.e. between the second and third vertical lines in Fig. 3d). For SML13 and KFJ4, however, we only detected heterogeneous ice
formation in one of the two ranges, i.e. for SML13 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 1.38 and 1.48, and for KFJ4 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The fact that the two regimes
are not interrelated suggests that different types of ice-nucleating
entities are responsible for the observed nucleation modes. To quantify the
heterogeneous ice nucleation ability of the particles, we have therefore
divided the range of ice saturation ratios into two regions, (i) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.38 and (ii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.48, and have
summarised in Table 3 the maximum values of FF and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that occurred in
these two ranges. In the first regime, the FF data were extremely low, with a maximum value of only 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the corresponding ice nucleation active
surface site densities were of the order of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, very close to the estimated detection limit of our OPC measurements (see Sect. 2.3.2). Nonetheless, we are confident that these small nucleation modes are related
to the particles generated from the SM100 culture and the surface seawater
samples and are not caused by the chamber background for two reasons: firstly, for the simple reason that some experiments did not show this early
nucleation mode at all, and secondly, because repeated reference expansion
runs with the background aerosol particles present in the cleaned AIDA
chamber (typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) only led to ice formation
at or above the homogeneous freezing level. In the second heterogeneous ice
nucleation regime at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 1.38 and 1.48, the maximum FF and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were typically 1 order of magnitude larger than in the first regime, with the two most ice-active samples SM100 and SML13 even exceeding
an ice nucleation active surface site density of
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value for the diluted <italic>Skeletonema marinoi</italic> culture,
SM100_dil, was of the same order as for most of the field
samples. As a comparison, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from Table 3 are about 2 orders of magnitude smaller than those derived from AIDA expansion cooling
runs with desert dust particles at cirrus temperatures
(Ullrich et al., 2017).</p>
      <?pagebreak page13916?><p id="d1e5226">An intriguing question is whether one can relate the heterogeneous ice
nucleation ability of the particles at cirrus conditions to the freezing
behaviour of the bulk solutions at mixed-phase cloud temperatures. To
facilitate such comparison, we have included in the last column of Table 3
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> freezing temperatures of the bulk samples from the data shown in
Fig. 2a. In both temperature regimes, the underlying ice formation pathway
is immersion freezing, but as discussed in Sect. 2.2, aerosolisation might
affect the amount and identity of the ice-nucleating entities, in particular
in the experiment with the SM100 culture. Nonetheless, we can draw some
tentative conclusions. One noticeable tendency is that the respective bulk
solutions of particles that revealed a comparably strong nucleation mode at
low saturation ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.38) in the AIDA expansion runs
like STN2, SML6, KFJ4, and KFJ5 also showed a relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
freezing temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">262</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the INSEKT measurements. One might
therefore speculate that the few but very efficient ice-nucleating entities which caused the very small ice nucleation mode at low supersaturations in
the AIDA experiments could be the same that were responsible for the
freezing of the sample aliquots at high temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">262</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
However, due to the extremely low FF values from the AIDA experiments and the
correspondingly large uncertainties, we refrain from an in-depth statistical
correlation analysis between FF and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A somewhat more secure conclusion
is that the occurrence of a pronounced heterogeneous ice nucleation mode at
higher ice saturation ratios in the AIDA chamber (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.48)
is not linked to a particularly high freezing temperature of the respective
bulk solutions. As mentioned above, the particles generated from the SML13
and SM100 samples showed the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range,
but the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> freezing temperatures of the bulk solutions
belonged to the lower end of the spectrum of observed freezing temperatures.
We will resume this discussion in Sect. 4 when we compare our new AIDA
results with the previous ice nucleation measurements summarised in the
introduction.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e5365">Time series of the AIDA records from the expansion cooling
experiments started at 217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for three different samples <bold>(a–c)</bold>. The
sample called “blank” again refers to the commercial bulk Atlantic water
sample that has already previously been probed in the AIDA chamber
(Wagner et al., 2018). The individual panels show the same
data types as in Fig. 3.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/13903/2021/acp-21-13903-2021-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5387">Illustration of the ice nucleation behaviour observed
during the AIDA expansion runs with the particles generated from the bulk
Atlantic water sample (blank <bold>(a)</bold>) and the STN2 microlayer sample <bold>(b)</bold>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trajectories of the AIDA experiments are shown as the grey lines. The dashed black line denotes ice-saturated conditions, the red line
displays the saturation curve with respect to supercooled liquid water, the
homogeneous freezing onset of aqueous solution droplets is indicated by the
blue line (Koop et al., 2000b), and the shaded orange area shows an estimate
for the RH range of the full deliquescence (FDRH) of inorganic sea salt
particles as discussed in the text. Blue stars denote measured FDRH onsets
using the SIMONE light scattering data. The size of the purple-coloured dots superimposed on the trajectories represents the FF values encountered during the expansion runs. The green box labelled I denotes the range of onset
conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for ice nucleation on the particles from the
microlayer samples investigated by Wolf et al. (2020) (eastern tropical North Pacific Ocean and Florida Straits, temperature range 227–231 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The green bar labelled II represents the range of ice nucleation onsets
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) observed in the experiments by Wilson et al. (2015)
(aerosolised microlayer samples from the North Pacific and the British
Columbia coastline probed at 233 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/13903/2021/acp-21-13903-2021-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e5481">Quantitative analysis of the AIDA expansion cooling runs started at
217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The sample called “blank” refers to a commercial bulk Atlantic
water sample that has previously been probed in the AIDA chamber
(Wagner et al., 2018). Due to the similarity of the ice
nucleation behaviour between the samples, not all of them were probed at
this temperature (no experiment with STN1, KFJ4, KFJ5, and
SM100_dil). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: start temperature of the expansion cooling run. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice,onset</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: temperature at the onset of ice nucleation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice,onset</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: ice saturation ratio at the onset of ice
nucleation. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: temperature when the maximum ice saturation ratio during the expansion run was reached. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: maximum ice saturation ratio during the expansion run. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: ice nucleation active
surface site density evaluated at the maximum ice saturation ratio.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice,onset</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice,onset</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Blank</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">217.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">215.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">214.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">STN2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">216.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">214.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">213.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">STN7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">216.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">214.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">213.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SML6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">216.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">214.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">214.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SML10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">216.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">214.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">213.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SML12.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">216.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">214.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">213.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SML13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">216.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">214.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">213.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">216.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">214.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">213.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">216.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">214.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">213.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">216.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">214.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">214.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SM100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">217.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">214.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">213.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Start temperature 217\,{$\unit{{K}}$}, where inorganic salts
contribute to heterogeneous ice formation}?><title>Start temperature 217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where inorganic salts
contribute to heterogeneous ice formation</title>
      <p id="d1e6055">Figure 5a shows the AIDA records of an experiment where the ice nucleation
ability of the particles generated from the bulk Atlantic water sample was
probed at a lower starting temperature of 217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (data from Fig. 6, upper
right panel, of Wagner et al., 2018). The key difference compared to the
data shown in Fig. 3a is that we see the initial water uptake by the brine
layer (small reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, small increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>for</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but the
full deliquescence step does not occur, and instead a dominant nucleation mode of ice crystals starts to form at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to immersion
freezing by the still undissolved particle core primarily composed of NaCl
(vertical line in Fig. 5a). The activated fraction is so large (FF
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) that the nucleated ice crystals rapidly deplete the
excess of water vapour, limiting the peak saturation ratio during the
expansion run to a maximum value, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of 1.30. In this case the
relevant question is “Will the additional organic compounds in the microlayer samples and the SM100 culture have any influence on this strong
heterogeneous ice nucleation ability already shown by the inorganic salt
components?” Two exemplary AIDA data sets from expansion runs with particles generated from the SM100 and KFJ1 samples are shown in Fig. 5b and c.
Through visual inspection alone, the time series of the saturation ratios
(panel II) and the scatter plots with the OPC data (panel III) look
unchanged in comparison with the blank experiment shown in Fig. 5a. A
quantitative analysis is provided in Table 4. Here, we have tabulated the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nucleation onsets for a FF of 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and have computed the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values at the peak ice saturation ratio that was reached during the
individual expansion runs. The data underline the very high similarity of
the ice nucleation behaviour between the various samples and, in particular,
that there is no notable difference between the blank experiment with the
bulk Atlantic water sample and the experiments with the SM100 culture or the
microlayer and surface seawater samples. All <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> onsets and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values fall into the compact ranges of 1.24–1.28 and 4.9–6.2
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Note that these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values,
which represent the immersion freezing mode of the inorganic salt components
at 217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are typically 2 to 3 orders of magnitude larger than those representing the immersion freezing mode of the organic compounds contained
in the microlayer and surface seawater samples as well as the SM100 culture
at 229 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 3).</p>
      <p id="d1e6238">As a summary of our observations, we show in Fig. 6 two diagrams in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> space to illustrate the difference in the ice nucleation
abilities at 229 and 217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, contrasting the behaviour of the particles from
the bulk Atlantic water sample (blank, Fig. 6a) with that of the particles
generated from the microlayer sample STN2 (Fig. 6b). The grey lines show the
trajectories of the AIDA expansion experiments started at 229 and 217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
covering the period from the start of pumping to the time when the maximum
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value was reached. The size of the purple-coloured circles
superimposed on the trajectories denotes the FF encountered in the course of
expansion cooling. Reference lines indicate the homogeneous freezing onset
of aqueous solution droplets (blue line, Koop et al., 2000b), the
saturation curve with respect to supercooled liquid water (red line), and
ice-saturated conditions (dashed black line). The estimated RH range of the
full deliquescence (FDRH) of inorganic sea salt particles is indicated by
the orange-shaded area. At 298 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Tang et al. (1997) observed the full dissolution of levitated sea salt aerosol particles at RH between 71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> RH, whereas pure NaCl particles deliquesced at 75.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> RH. We
therefore scaled the extrapolated, temperature-dependent parameterisation of
the deliquescence relative humidities of pure NaCl particles from Tang and
Munkelwitz (1993) with an absolute, temperature-independent shift between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the relative<?pagebreak page13917?> humidity scale to estimate the RH range
for the full dissolution of the inorganic sea salt particles at low
temperatures. The measured onsets for the full deliquescence in the
expansion runs started at 229 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are indicated by the blue stars. Whereas the
fully deliquesced particles from the bulk Atlantic water sample only started
to nucleate ice at the homogeneous freezing threshold when probed at 229 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the particles from the STN2 microlayer sample exhibited two weak
heterogeneous ice nucleation modes prior to homogeneous freezing, with the
first mode occurring just at the onset of the full deliquescence step (FF
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the second mode at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Much higher FF values of the order of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed for both particle types in the expansion runs started at 217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Heterogeneous ice formation started just before the predicted FDRH of the
particles was reached, and the rapid increase in the FF after the nucleation onset limited <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to peak values of 1.30–1.35. The green box and the green bar in Fig. 6b (with labels I and II) indicate the range of onset
conditions for ice nucleation observed in the CFDC experiments by Wolf et
al. (2020) and Wilson et al. (2015). Section 4.2 will address the comparison
of these literature data with our results.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e6449">Homogenous and heterogeneous ice nucleation onsets from the AIDA
expansion run with the particles generated from the SM100 culture shown in
Fig. 3b (light green and blue diamonds) in comparison with data from
previous experiments with phytoplankton and marine bacterial species (see
Sect. 1.2). The onsets from the immersion freezing measurements with the
technique by Alpert et al. (2011a) were evaluated at median freezing
temperatures for homogeneous and heterogeneous ice nucleation. The
heterogeneous ice nucleation onsets from the AIDA and the various CFDC
experiments correspond to different FF values as indicated in the legend and
discussed in Sect. 4.1. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trajectory of the AIDA experiment is shown as the grey line. The other reference lines are the same as shown
in Fig. 6.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/13903/2021/acp-21-13903-2021-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page13918?><sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion and outlook</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Ice nucleation experiments with phytoplankton species</title>
      <p id="d1e6494">Our new AIDA results on the ice nucleation behaviour of particles generated
from microlayer and surface seawater suspensions and diatom cultures at
cirrus temperatures show both similarities to and discrepancies with the data from the previous studies that we have summarised in Sect. 1.2. In Fig. 7,
we present a compilation of the freezing data for the experiments with
phytoplankton and marine bacterial cells as well as their exudates. The grey
line shows the trajectory of our AIDA expansion experiment with the
particles generated from the SM100 culture in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> space.
The light-green-coloured diamonds denote the two heterogeneous freezing onsets determined during the expansion run, with the first one at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> representing the very small freezing mode with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the second one at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the dominant nucleation
mode with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3b, first and second vertical lines, respectively). The light-blue-coloured diamond shows the onset of homogeneous freezing (third vertical line in Fig. 3b). The onset of the
dominant heterogeneous ice nucleation mode of <italic>Skeletonema marinoi</italic> (SM100) is in very good
agreement with the freezing data for cells of <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic> and <italic>Nannochloris atomus</italic> in aqueous NaCl solution
droplets (Alpert et al., 2011a, b) as well as the exudate freezing onsets
of <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic> (Wilson et al., 2015). These algal species show a similar reduction of
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nucleation onsets by about 0.10–0.15 with respect to the
homogeneous freezing line, whereas the freezing data for the coccolithophore
<italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> coincide with those measured for pure NaCl solution droplets
(Alpert et al., 2011a). It is notable that the heterogeneous
freezing mode is not only linked to the intact diatom cells, but also to the
exudate material present in the diatom cultures. This follows both from the
results of Wilson et al. (2015) for exudates of <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic> and from our experiments
with the <italic>Skeletonema marinoi</italic> culture, where we argued that nebulisation of the cell suspension
did not lead to the transfer of intact cells to the aerosol phase. Given
this, ice-active material released by phytoplankton exudation might also be
responsible for the heterogeneous freezing mode at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 1.38 and
1.48, which we have observed in several experiments with the particles
generated from the microlayer samples.</p>
      <p id="d1e6630">Ladino et al. (2016) detected in their CFDC measurements a very small early
ice nucleation mode at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the exudates of
<italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic>, <italic>Nannochloris atomus</italic>, <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic>, and <italic>Vibrio harveyi</italic> with FF values between 0.001 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (green pentagon in Fig.
7). This is also in agreement with our measurements, where we observed an
equally small early nucleation mode for SM100 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since this nucleation mode was enhanced in some of the surface
seawater samples, we speculate that it is only partially attributable to
ice-active material from fresh phytoplankton cells and may also be related
to various altering pathways that produce additional or different types of
ice-nucleating entities. Such pathways may include, on the one hand, the
processing of exudates either through biological processes such as microbial
metabolism (Wang et al., 2015; McCluskey et al., 2017) or physicochemical
processes such as photochemistry and,<?pagebreak page13919?> on the other hand, mechanisms such as
cell lysis by which additional intracellular organic material can be
released. The latter effect was clearly shown by the ice nucleation
experiments with <italic>Prochlorococcus</italic> (Wolf et al., 2019). Here, particles generated from an
untreated cell suspension nucleated ice at the homogeneous freezing
threshold, while cell lysis induced by sonication reduced the particles' freezing onset to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 5 in Wolf et al.,
2019). It should be emphasised that this nucleation onset already
corresponded to a FF of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, underlining the strong effect on the ice
nucleation behaviour that was induced by the targeted treatment of the
<italic>Prochlorococcus</italic> cells by sonication. Similarly, the heterogeneous freezing mode of SM100 at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could also be related to the additional release of
ice-active intracellular material when using the ultrasonic nebuliser for
aerosol particle generation. However, the amount of dispersed ice-nucleating
entities was obviously much smaller than in the Wolf et al. (2019) study.
This could be due to the different cell concentrations of the suspensions
examined in our work compared to those in Wolf et al. (2019), i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <italic>Skeletonema marinoi</italic> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <italic>Prochlorococcus</italic>. Additional ice nucleation experiments performed by Wolf et al. (2019) with
a variety of organic compounds indicated that certain proteins and
carbohydrates like aspartic acid, amylopectin, and agarose could be
responsible for the improved ice nucleation ability of the particles from
the lysed <italic>Prochlorococcus</italic> cultures. Such additional ice-nucleating entities might also
explain the particularly high freezing temperature of some microlayer
samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">262</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the bulk freezing measurements with
INSEKT, whereas aliquots of the pristine SM100 culture only froze at a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 254.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The latter value is in reasonable agreement with the
freezing temperature of 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported for <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic> cells in pure water droplets
(Knopf et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Ice nucleation experiments with sea surface microlayer and surface
seawater samples</title>
      <?pagebreak page13920?><p id="d1e6893">Whereas our ice nucleation experiments with SM100 fit well into previous
data, the same is not true for the ice nucleation experiments with our
microlayer and surface seawater samples. Both the particles from the samples
collected by Wilson et al. (2015) and by Wolf et al. (2020) showed much
higher ice-active fractions at temperatures above 220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As noted above, the
range of onset conditions for exceeding a FF of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in those measurements is
depicted by the green bar and the green box in Fig. 6b. The critical
saturation ratios to exceed a FF of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were as low as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">233</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the particles from the Pacific microlayer samples
investigated by Wilson et al. (2015), and the inferred <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values reached
a magnitude of about
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Wolf et al. (2020)
observed a strong reduction of the nucleation onsets (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the
particles from the eastern tropical North Pacific Ocean and the Florida Straits from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
when reducing the temperature from 231 to 227 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the North Pacific
sampling region, even the particles from subsurface seawater samples
collected between 2 and 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below the surface showed a dominant
heterogeneous freezing mode, with an average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> onset for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of about 1.25 at 227 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wolf et al.,
2020). In contrast, we did not even observe a heterogeneous freezing mode
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the particles from our Arctic microlayer and surface
seawater samples in the expansion runs started at 229 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Amongst our
samples, SML13 showed the highest ice-active fraction, amounting to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the nucleation regime between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1.48,
corresponding to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. 2 orders of magnitude lower than typically observed for the Pacific samples probed by Wilson et al. (2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e7222">Due to the limited number of measurements, it is premature to ascribe this
difference solely to the geographical sampling region, i.e. the Arctic region in our study versus locations in temperate and subtropical zones in
the studies by Wilson et al. (2015) and Wolf et al. (2020). A factor that
could contribute to a regional variation in the INP concentrations is the
biogeographic pattern of the phytoplankton species. As summarised in Sect.
1.2, there are notable variations in the heterogeneous ice nucleation
ability of various phytoplankton species under cirrus conditions, with e.g.
<italic>Prochlorococcus</italic> showing distinctly lower critical ice saturation ratios compared to
<italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic>, <italic>Nannochloris atomus</italic>, and <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic>. The phytoplankton species richness in the tropics was found to be
about 3 times that at higher latitudes (Righetti et al., 2019), potentially increasing the probability that a particularly ice-active
species can be found in field-collected microlayer samples from tropical
regions. <italic>Melosira arctica</italic>, the most productive algae in the Arctic Ocean (Booth and Horner,
1997), was not a source of particularly active INPs in our previous AIDA ice
nucleation measurements that focussed on the mixed-phase cloud temperature
region (Ickes et al., 2020). Differences in the local biological activity
could influence the organic carbon enrichment in the SSA particles and thereby affect their ice nucleation ability (Wolf et al., 2020). However, it
is still unclear to what extent the organic enrichment in sea spray aerosol
is controlled by the primary productivity in marine environments, which is
characterised by chlorophyll-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels of seawater as a measure of phytoplankton biomass. Several studies have found that the organic matter
enrichment in sea spray is directly linked to primary production (e.g.
Ceburnis et al., 2011, 2016; van Pinxteren et al., 2017). Other studies have
reported that the size-resolved organic mass fractions were relatively
invariant for a wide range of phytoplankton biomass and a broad diversity of
phytoplankton components (e.g. Quinn et al., 2014; Bates et al., 2020).
Quinn et al. (2014) therefore concluded that local biological activity is of
minor importance and uncoupled from a large reservoir of organic carbon in
ocean surface waters, which primarily controls the enrichment of organic
matter in SSA particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e7248">When comparing different measurements, it is important to take into account
that there can also be a strong seasonal variation in the INP concentrations
for the same sampling location and that the measured ice nucleation ability
might also depend on the thickness of the sampled microlayer, i.e. how much ice-active organic material was sampled in relation to inorganic solutes
(Irish et al., 2017, 2019), and therefore on the technique
used to acquire the sample. Nonetheless, it is remarkable that the
heterogeneous ice nucleation activity of all our samples is consistently
very low at cirrus conditions, provided that the inorganic salts are not yet
ice-active. The bulk freezing measurements with INSEKT clearly indicated that our samples contained representative amounts of ice-nucleating entities
at mixed-phase cloud conditions. A quantitative comparison between ice
nucleation under mixed-phase cloud and cirrus conditions is challenging
because different nucleation modes might be involved. As noted in the
introduction, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of SSA particles are typically 2 to 3 orders of magnitude lower than those of mineral and soil dust under
mixed-phase cloud conditions (DeMott et al., 2016). For the particles
from our microlayer and surface seawater samples, we observed the same poor
heterogeneous ice nucleation ability in comparison with mineral and soil
dust also under cirrus conditions down to a temperature of about 220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
below which the crystalline inorganic salts became ice-active.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Influence of the aerosolisation method</title>
      <p id="d1e7278">A key factor in all laboratory experiments with microlayer samples and
phytoplankton species is the aerosolisation method. In Wilson et al. (2015), Wolf et al. (2020), as well as our study, the particles were
produced from well-mixed microlayer and surface seawater samples with
standard aerosol generators, so that we do not have any reason to assume
that the observed differences in the ice nucleation activity are related to
the aerosol generation method. However, all of these measurements only
represent some kind of averaged ice nucleation activity, meaning that the
ice-nucleating entities are equally distributed amongst all particles and
that there is presumably no significant variability in the particle
composition. As already mentioned in Sect. 2.2, these techniques do not
mimic the natural process of sea spray aerosol production, where the
bursting of bubble cap films can lead to the formation of highly organically
enriched particles (O'Dowd et al., 2004; Ault et al., 2013; Prather et
al., 2013). For ice nucleation experiments under cirrus conditions, the
particle composition is particularly important because it can influence the
underlying ice nucleation mode. For particles predominantly or even
exclusively composed of organics, the ice nucleation mode might change from
immersion freezing, as observed in the AIDA experiments, to deposition
nucleation, where ice formation initiates by the deposition of water vapour
on crystalline or glassy surfaces (Murray et al., 2010; Wilson et al.,
2012). For this reason, Wolf et al. (2019) have used pure organic compounds
as a proxy to represent the ice nucleation ability of the particles from the
lysed <italic>Prochlorococcus</italic> cells.</p>
      <?pagebreak page13921?><p id="d1e7284">In our previous ice nucleation experiments at mixed-phase cloud
temperatures, we have attempted a more representative way of SSA production
and have added 80 to 900 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> volumes of microlayer suspensions and diatom
cultures to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of artificial seawater in a sea spray simulation chamber
(Ickes et al., 2020). Here
the entrainment of air and associated bubble formation was induced by a
plunging jet of water (Christiansen et al., 2019).
The major drawback of this method was the extremely long injection period of
14–16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to fill the 84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> volume of the AIDA chamber with a
sufficiently high particle number concentration of 300–400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
our current study, we have used the nebuliser instead of this time-consuming
technique because we wanted to get an overview of the ice nucleation
activities of many individual samples and directly compare them to those
found by Wilson et al. (2015) and Wolf et al. (2020), i.e. studies where the particles were also generated from well-mixed microlayer samples.
However, we consider the additional use of such sea spray simulation
chambers or wave channels for mimicking SSA generation as one of the two
most important directions for future laboratory studies on the SSA
particles' ice nucleation ability at cirrus conditions. The associated
questions would be twofold. Even if the average ice nucleation activity of the particles from a specific microlayer sample were small (as shown in the
AIDA experiments), could it be possible that a larger proportion of
ice-active particles is formed when the sample is added to the sea spray
simulation chamber, with the chance that purely organic or highly
organic-rich particles are also formed? And the question formulated in the
opposite direction would be “Even if the average ice nucleation activity of the particles from a well-mixed microlayer sample were high (like in the
samples probed by Wilson et al., 2015 and Wolf et al., 2020), how much of
this activity would be retained if we added the microlayer sample to the sea
spray tank and mimicked a more natural way of particle production?” In our experiments at mixed-phase cloud conditions, we observed a very diverse
behaviour, with some microlayer samples retaining their ice nucleation
activity when added to the sea spray tank, while for others the activity was
significantly reduced
(Ickes et al., 2020). As
previously mentioned, under cirrus conditions the outcome of such
experiments is additionally complicated by the potential change in the ice
nucleation mode depending on whether particles with a high or low amount of organic substances are formed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Influence of the ice nucleation measurement technique</title>
      <p id="d1e7344">The second one of the two most important factors in future studies would be
the intercomparison of different ice nucleation measurement techniques. The
most recent laboratory workshop on the intercomparison of ice nucleation
measurements focussed on immersion freezing experiments under mixed-phase cloud conditions (DeMott et al., 2018). We consider it
equally important to perform such a study under cirrus conditions where, due
to their complex hygroscopic behaviour, SSA particles would be an
interesting and experimentally challenging INP type to be investigated. Let
us imagine an aerosol particle that was produced from a microlayer sample,
dried to a low relative humidity, and is now in a supersaturated environment
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 225 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, on the one hand suspended in the AIDA
chamber and on the other in transit through the flow region of a CFDC. In
the AIDA chamber, the particle has undergone a long RH history before
reaching the specified conditions. It was first added to the chamber at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and kept there for at least 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the
size distribution measurements. Then, it was subjected to a moderate
expansion cooling cycle, and in the course of about 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the ice saturation ratio increased to 1.3. The AIDA measurements with the Arctic surface
seawater samples clearly revealed the various deliquescence steps the
particle had time to undergo, i.e. the partial deliquescence already upon injection at ice-saturated conditions and the full deliquescence step in the
initial period of the expansion run. Although the ice saturation ratio in
the flow region of a CFDC can also be increased smoothly, the instrument is
constantly flushed with fresh aerosol particles. The aerosol is surrounded
by two sheath air flows, so that the sample temperature and the water vapour
environment are very narrow and well defined (Rogers, 1988). The location of
the aerosol lamina and its associated temperature and supersaturation
conditions can be accurately calculated from instrumental parameters such as
wall temperatures, sheath flow rates, and sample flow rates (Rogers, 1988;
Kulkarni and Kok, 2012; Garimella et al., 2016). Computational fluid
dynamics calculations show that the initially warm and dry sample air flow
quickly adopts the nominal lamina temperature and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value within the
upper 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> section of the main chamber (Garimella et al., 2016). As
such, an aerosol particle in the centre of the flow region of a CFDC at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3 and 225 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is instantly subjected to these ice-supersaturated conditions after drying and has not experienced the same RH history as in
the AIDA chamber. Its transit time through the nucleation region of a CFDC
is typically about 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Rogers, 1988). Recent measurements with the
SPIN–CFDC have shown that the instrument is capable of detecting the deliquescence of inorganic sea salt particles even at low temperature,
meaning that the deliquescence occurs at least within a couple of seconds
(Kong et al., 2018). However, the situation might change for aerosol
particles with organic components from the microlayer.</p>
      <p id="d1e7456">Organic-rich particles might prevail in a highly viscous or glassy state at
low temperature, with the result that there is a competition between water
uptake and deposition ice nucleation on the glassy, solidified organic
surface (Reid et al., 2018). The effect of kinetic
limitations of water diffusion and its impact on equilibration timescales
and modes of ice nucleation have already been investigated in various
computational studies with model organic substances (e.g. Berkemeier et al.,
2014; Lienhard et al., 2015; Price et al.,<?pagebreak page13922?> 2015; Fowler et al., 2020). For
example, Price et al. (2015) modelled equilibration times for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene secondary organic material based on experimental diffusion
measurements. At temperatures of 260 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and above, these timescales were
faster than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the considered RH range between 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At 240 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the response time was already in the range of a couple of seconds for low RH
values and might further increase up to hours at upper-tropospheric temperatures (Price et al., 2015). In the AIDA chamber, the hygroscopic
behaviour of the particles from the Arctic microlayer and surface seawater
samples was unchanged compared to purely inorganic sea salt particles,
showing that there were no kinetic limitations with respect to water uptake
on the experimental timescale. This excludes deposition nucleation as the relevant ice formation mode and could be a factor contributing to the
difference of our ice nucleation results with those from the two CFDC
studies by Wilson et al. (2015) and Wolf et al. (2020). The different ice
nucleation ability observed in these studies might be caused by a different
nucleation mechanism. Wolf et al. (2020) underlined the highly biologically productive environment of the eastern tropical North Pacific Ocean sampling location. If organic-rich particles from this location are
probed in a CFDC with a short residence time, liquefaction might be
incomplete and deposition nucleation on the solid-like organic surface might
be the dominant ice nucleation pathway. The important question that could be
dealt with in the proposed intercomparison workshop is whether the same
behaviour would also have been observed in the AIDA chamber experiments with
longer observation times. Previous ice nucleation measurements with
highly viscous secondary organic aerosol particles from the oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene confirm that this is a relevant question (Ignatius et al.,
2016; Wagner et al., 2017). Whereas SPIN–CFDC measurements detected a pronounced heterogeneous ice nucleation mode for such particles at about 235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ignatius et al., 2016), AIDA expansion runs conducted at the same
temperature only showed ice formation at the homogeneous freezing limit,
demonstrating the liquefaction of the particles on the experimental timescale (Wagner et al., 2017). Moreover, Ladino et al. (2014) showed
that pre-cooling is a factor that controls the ice nucleation ability of highly viscous organic aerosol particles. Pre-cooling led to a decrease in the particles' ice nucleation onsets, presumably because the particles were
more viscous or solid-like. Another subject of the proposed intercomparison
could be exposing the particles to various RH and temperature conditions
prior to CFDC sampling and examining the associated effect on their ability
to nucleate ice.</p>
      <p id="d1e7522">Even if we have found that the dried particles from our microlayer samples
showed no notable change in their hygroscopic behaviour compared to
inorganic sea salt, we are still far from formulating this as a general
statement. It was recently shown that wintertime Arctic SSA particles originating from open leads featured particularly high volume fractions of
organic material that was produced as a cryoprotectant
(Kirpes et al., 2019). The organic components formed a
thick coating layer around the sea salt core. From a mechanistic point of
view, it would be highly interesting to investigate the water uptake and ice
nucleation behaviour of such internally mixed SSA particles. Apart from experiments with cloud chambers and CFDCs, the direct observation of ice
nucleation on individual particles with an environmental scanning electron
microscope would be another promising approach (Zimmermann et al., 2007;
Wang et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Influence of inorganic salts and concluding remarks</title>
      <p id="d1e7534">If the SSA particles temporarily encounter a relative humidity below about
40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during their transport in the atmosphere and the precipitation of the
inorganic salts, in particularly NaCl, is induced, they can become very
efficient INPs at temperatures below 220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, irrespective of the amount of
potentially ice-active organic material that is contained in them (Fig. 5).
We found little variation of this strong immersion freezing mode associated
with the crystalline salt constituents throughout our investigated
microlayer and surface seawater samples (Table 4). However, an important
point is the temperature where the SSA particles encounter the low relative
humidity. On the one hand, efflorescence at low temperatures might be
inhibited if the SSA particles contain a high volume fraction of organic
material (Bodsworth et al., 2010). On the other hand, if
efflorescence in not inhibited, the temperature controls which crystalline
form of NaCl precipitates from the solution droplets. Below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">240</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the formation of sodium chloride dihydrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is favoured over anhydrous NaCl (Wagner et al., 2012; Wise et
al., 2012; Peckhaus et al., 2016). AIDA ice nucleation experiments with
partly deliquesced inorganic sea salt particles that contained a solid core
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> instead of anhydrous NaCl showed that the
temperature limit below which the immersion freezing mode of the particles
initiated was shifted to much higher temperatures (Wagner
et al., 2018). In the case of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a prominent
immersion freezing mode that started at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was already
observed in an expansion run conducted at 229 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. at a starting temperature where the partially deliquesced particles that were initially
dried at room temperature and thus contained anhydrous NaCl as the solid
core only showed ice formation at the homogeneous freezing limit (see Fig.
3a). Low-temperature crystallisation, if it is not inhibited, would thus increase the range of temperatures where purely inorganic sea salt particles
are very active INPs.</p>
      <?pagebreak page13923?><p id="d1e7660">The influence of the salt constituents is another example that there are
manifold factors which control the ice nucleation activity of SSA particles
at cirrus conditions. The activity is not only related to the amount and
identity of the organic material that is transferred to the particle phase
by the bubble bursting process, but also to the potential crystallisation of
NaCl or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the spatial distribution of organic
and inorganic components in the particles, which could affect the mode of
the ice nucleation process. As such, our measurements add a piece of new
information to this research topic, but we are still far from developing a
generalised parameterisation for the SSA particles' ice nucleation ability
under cirrus conditions, for which the RH history of the particles would also be a crucial factor. In summary, we have shown that partly deliquesced
particles from our surface seawater samples and the SM100 diatom culture are
very efficient INPs below 220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to immersion freezing induced by the
solid NaCl core but have found a much lower heterogeneous ice nucleation activity for the fully deliquesced particles above 220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which could be
ascribed to immersion freezing by the organic constituents. The latter
result deviates from previous ice nucleation measurements with particles
generated from microlayer suspensions from other sampling locations. Whether
this difference is only a reflection of the strongly varying ice nucleation
activity that is commonly also observed under mixed-phase cloud conditions
for different microlayer samples or is also related to the employed ice nucleation measurement techniques has to be addressed in future
intercomparison workshops. The results from such an instrument
intercomparison would also be beneficial for the development of
parameterisation schemes and for the interpretation of previous and future
field measurements at sites which are influenced by marine air masses
(Ladino et al., 2016; China et al., 2017).</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page13924?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>The Kongsfjorden sampling site</title>
      <p id="d1e7713">The high-latitude glacial fjord Kongsfjorden (79<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is situated
at the western coast of the Svalbard Archipelago and has become an established reference site for investigations of the marine ecosystem of the European
Arctic (Hop et al., 2002; Svendsen et al., 2002; Wiencke and Hop, 2016).
It is affected by both Atlantic and Arctic water masses. Whereas the inner
fjord is strongly influenced by glacial run-off from large tidal glaciers,
the magnitude of glacial effects is reduced towards the outer fjord, where
advection of warm and saline Atlantic water by the West Spitsbergen Current
(WSC) is an important factor in controlling the biological activity and diversity. The spring phytoplankton bloom typically starts by the end of
April, but relatively high production levels are maintained during the
summer season, which is characterised by diverse phytoplankton communities
(Hop et al., 2002; Iversen and Seuthe, 2011; van de Poll et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e7733">The seawater samples for this study were collected on 5 July 2017 in the
transitional zone of Kongsfjorden, east of the settlement of Ny-Ålesund
in possible influence of the outflow from the Midtre Lovénbreen glacier.
The sampling took place on a small inflatable boat (Zodiac) using a Niskin
bottle sampler placed horizontally onto the water surface. The pre-cleaned
Niskin sampler was triple-rinsed with sample water prior to sample
collection. The surface seawater was filled from the Niskin sampler outlet
directly into sterile sampling bags (Whirl-Pak<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">®</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Roth) and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the chemical and INP analyses. The
weather was windy and cloudy and the sea was rough. Wind speeds measured at
the nearby meteorological station of Ny-Ålesund ranged between 3.4 and
6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, wind directions between 244 and 272<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,  and the air
temperature was about 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the sampling period
(Maturilli, 2018).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S1.T5"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d1e7807">Aquatic chemistry and bacterial abundance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bac</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of
the five surface seawater samples from Kongsfjorden. See Appendix A for
details on the analytical methods.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="13">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bac</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(# <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1523</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">558.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17 508.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2890.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10 137.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">334.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1091.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">312.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1092</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">193.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18 438.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2636.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10 421.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">340.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1192.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">371.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1294</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">251.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19 066.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2525.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10 746.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">350.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1233.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">389.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1152</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">131.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19 215.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2536.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10 847.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">21.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">351.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1232.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">394.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KFJ5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1086</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">94.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19 110.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2520.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10 760.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">352.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1241.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">387.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e8511"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Table A1 summarises the measured aquatic chemistry and bacterial abundance
of the samples. For the measurement of the aquatic chemistry, a portion of
each sample was filtered through a precombusted glass fibre filter (MN GF-5,
Macherey-Nagel, 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Anions and cations were determined by
ion chromatography (ICS-1100 or ICS-1000, Dionex). For the determination of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (TOC-CPH, Shimazdu) and
dissolved nitrogen (DN) (TNM-1, Shimazdu), the samples were acidified with
200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L 2N HCl to reach a pH of 1.5 to 2. For the determination of the bacterial abundance, 45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of liquid was filled to sterile 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> falcon tubes (Roth) and fixated with 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formol (formaldehyde, 35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sterile).
The fixated samples were then filtrated (Maine Manufacturing, Polycarbonate,
black, 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diameter), pigmented with 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L DAPI (4`6-Diamidino-2-phenylindol, Roth), and affixed to an object plate with
immersion oil (Cargille, Type A) after 5–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of exposure time. The
bacterial abundance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bac</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was determined with an epifluorescence
microscope (Axiophot 2, Zeiss), with a total amplification of 1000–1600
using Eqs. (A1) and (A2).

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M585" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>A1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bac</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DF</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ctd</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>A2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext>DF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>fix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e8689">Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bac</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the number of bacteria (bacteria per mL), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the number
of counted bacteria, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the total area of the filter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">346</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), DF the dilution factor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ctd</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the counted area of the
filter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the filtrated volume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the total
volume of the sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>fix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the volume of added fixative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e8842">The ice nucleation data sets derived in this work can be downloaded from the
KITopen repository, the central publication platform for KIT (Karlsruhe
Institute of Technology) scientists, at
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000136010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5445/IR/1000136010</ext-link> (Wagner et al., 2021).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e8851">LI, MES, and RW designed the work. The experimental work was carried out by RW, NE, NSU, and OM. AKB, NE, EG, BJM, and MES provided the resources. RW and BJM visualized the data. RW and NE wrote the original draft of the manuscript. All the authors contributed to the review and editing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e8857">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e8863">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e8869">We are grateful for the continuous support by all members of the Engineering and Infrastructure group of IMK-AAF, in particular by Olga
Dombrowski, Rainer Buschbacher, Tomasz Chudy, Steffen Vogt, and Georg
Scheurig. We would like to thank Luis Antonio Ladino and one anonymous referee for their valuable feedback.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e8874">This work has been funded by the Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher
Forschungszentren as part of the programme “Atmosphere and Climate”. Luisa Ickes was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Early
Postdoc.Mobility). Benjamin J. Murray was supported by the European Research
Council (MarineIce; grant no. 648661). Nsikanabasi Silas Umo was supported
by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany (grant no. 1188375). Matthew E. Salter was supported by the Swedish Research Council (grant no.
2016-05100).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \notforhtml{\newline}?>publication were covered by the Karlsruhe Institute<?xmltex \notforhtml{\newline}?> of Technology (KIT).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e8887">This paper was edited by Hinrich Grothe and reviewed by Luis Antonio Ladino and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Alpert, P. A., Aller, J. Y., and Knopf, D. A.: Initiation of the ice phase by marine biogenic surfaces in supersaturated gas and supercooled aqueous phases, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 19882–19894, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 2?><mixed-citation>Alpert, P. A., Aller, J. Y., and Knopf, D. A.: Ice nucleation from aqueous
NaCl droplets with and without marine diatoms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
5539–5555, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5539-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5539-2011</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 3?><mixed-citation> Ault, A. P., Moffet, R. C., Baltrusaitis, J., Collins, D. B., Ruppel, M. J., Cuadra-Rodriguez, L. A., Zhao, D. F., Guasco, T. L., Ebben, C. J., Geiger, F. M., Bertram, T. H., Prather, K. A., and Grassian, V. H.: Size-Dependent Changes in Sea Spray Aerosol Composition and Properties with Different Seawater Conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 5603–5612, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 4?><mixed-citation>Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Coffman, D. J., Johnson, J. E., Upchurch, L., Saliba, G., Lewis, S., Graff, J., Russell, L. M., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Variability in Marine Plankton Ecosystems Are Not Observed in Freshly Emitted Sea Spray Aerosol Over the North Atlantic Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085938, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085938" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL085938</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation>Berkemeier, T., Shiraiwa, M., Pöschl, U., and Koop, T.: Competition between water uptake and ice nucleation by glassy organic aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12513–12531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12513-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12513-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 6?><mixed-citation> Bigg, E. K.: Ice Nucleus Concentrations in Remote Areas, J. Atmos. Sci., 30, 1153–1157, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 7?><mixed-citation>Blanchard, D. C.: Sea-to-Air Transport of Surface Active Material, Science, 146, 396–397, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3642.396" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.146.3642.396</ext-link>, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 8?><mixed-citation>Blanchard, D. C.: The Ejection of Drops from the Sea and Their Enrichment with Bacteria and Other Materials: A Review, Estuaries, 12, 127–137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1351816" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/1351816</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 9?><mixed-citation>Bodsworth, A., Zobrist, B., and Bertram, A. K.: Inhibition of efflorescence in mixed organic-inorganic particles at temperatures less than 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 12, 12259–12266, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 10?><mixed-citation>Booth, B. C. and Horner, R. A.: Microalgae on the arctic ocean section, 1994: species abundance and biomass, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 44, 1607–1622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(97)00057-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0645(97)00057-X</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 11?><mixed-citation>Braban, C. F., Abbatt, J. P. D., and Cziczo, D. J.: Deliquescence of ammonium sulfate particles at sub-eutectic temperatures, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3879–3882, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013175" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001gl013175</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 12?><mixed-citation>Campbell, J. M., Meldrum, F. C., and Christenson, H. K.: Observing the formation of ice and organic crystals in active sites, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 810–815, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617717114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1617717114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 13?><mixed-citation>Ceburnis, D., Garbaras, A., Szidat, S., Rinaldi, M., Fahrni, S., Perron, N., Wacker, L., Leinert, S., Remeikis, V., Facchini, M. C., Prevot, A. S. H., Jennings, S. G., Ramonet, M., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Quantification of the carbonaceous matter origin in submicron marine aerosol by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotope analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8593–8606, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8593-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8593-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 14?><mixed-citation>Ceburnis, D., Masalaite, A., Ovadnevaite, J., Garbaras, A., Remeikis, V., Maenhaut, W., Claeys, M., Sciare, J., Baisnée, D., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Stable isotopes measurements reveal dual carbon pools contributing to organic matter enrichment in marine aerosol, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 36675, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36675" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep36675</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 15?><mixed-citation>China, S., Alpert, P. A., Zhang, B., Schum, S., Dzepina, K., Wright, K., Owen, R. C., Fialho, P., Mazzoleni, L. R., Mazzoleni, C., and Knopf, D. A.: Ice cloud formation potential by free tropospheric particles from long-range transport over t<?pagebreak page13926?>he Northern Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 3065–3079, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025817" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016jd025817</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 16?><mixed-citation>Christiansen, S., Salter, M. E., Gorokhova, E., Nguyen, Q. T., and Bilde, M.: Sea Spray Aerosol Formation: Laboratory Results on the Role of Air Entrainment, Water Temperature, and Phytoplankton Biomass, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 13107–13116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b04078</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 17?><mixed-citation>Cornwell, G., Sultana, C., Prank, M., Cochran, R., Hill, T., Schill, G., DeMott, P., Mahowald, N., and Prather, K.: Ejection of dust from the ocean as a potential source of marine ice nucleating particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD033073, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033073</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 18?><mixed-citation>Creamean, J. M., Cross, J. N., Pickart, R., McRaven, L., Lin, P., Pacini, A., Hanlon, R., Schmale, D. G., Ceniceros, J., Aydell, T., Colombi, N., Bolger, E., and DeMott, P. J.: Ice Nucleating Particles Carried From Below a Phytoplankton Bloom to the Arctic Atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8572–8581, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL083039</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 19?><mixed-citation>Cunliffe, M., Engel, A., Frka, S., Gasparovic, B., Guitart, C., Murrell, J. C., Salter, M., Stolle, C., Upstill-Goddard, R., and Wurl, O.: Sea surface microlayers: A unified physicochemical and biological perspective of the air-ocean interface, Prog. Oceanogr., 109, 104–116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.08.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2012.08.004</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 20?><mixed-citation> Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M. H., Zondlo, M. A., Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., and Murphy, D. M.: Clarifying the Dominant Sources and Mechanisms of Cirrus Cloud Formation, Science, 340, 1320–1324, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 21?><mixed-citation>David, R. O., Marcolli, C., Fahrni, J., Qiu, Y. Q., Sirkin, Y. A. P., Molinero, V., Mahrt, F., Bruhwiler, D., Lohmann, U., and Kanji, Z. A.: Pore condensation and freezing is responsible for ice formation below water saturation for porous particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 8184–8189, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813647116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1813647116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 22?><mixed-citation>DeLeon-Rodriguez, N., Lathem, T. L., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Barazesh, J. M., Anderson, B. E., Beyersdorf, A. J., Ziemba, L. D., Bergin, M., Nenes, A., and Konstantinidis, K. T.: Microbiome of the upper troposphere: Species composition and prevalence, effects of tropical storms, and atmospheric implications, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 2575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212089110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1212089110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 23?><mixed-citation> DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., McCluskey, C. S., Prather, K. A., Collins, D. B., Sullivan, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Mason, R. H., Irish, V. E., Lee, T., Hwang, C. Y., Rhee, T. S., Snider, J. R., McMeeking, G. R., Dhaniyala, S., Lewis, E. R., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J., Lee, C., Sultana, C. M., Ault, A. P., Axson, J. L., Martinez, M. D., Venero, I., Santos-Figueroa, G., Stokes, M. D., Deane, G. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Grassian, V. H., Bertram, T. H., Bertram, A. K., Moffett, B. F., and Franc, G. D.: Sea spray aerosol as a unique source of ice nucleating particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5797–5803, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 24?><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., Cziczo, D. J., Hiranuma, N., Petters, M. D., Petters, S. S., Belosi, F., Bingemer, H. G., Brooks, S. D., Budke, C., Burkert-Kohn, M., Collier, K. N., Danielczok, A., Eppers, O., Felgitsch, L., Garimella, S., Grothe, H., Herenz, P., Hill, T. C. J., Höhler, K., Kanji, Z. A., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Kristensen, T. B., Krüger, K., Kulkarni, G., Levin, E. J. T., Murray, B. J., Nicosia, A., O'Sullivan, D., Peckhaus, A., Polen, M. J., Price, H. C., Reicher, N., Rothenberg, D. A., Rudich, Y., Santachiara, G., Schiebel, T., Schrod, J., Seifried, T. M., Stratmann, F., Sullivan, R. C., Suski, K. J., Szakáll, M., Taylor, H. P., Ullrich, R., Vergara-Temprado, J., Wagner, R., Whale, T. F., Weber, D., Welti, A., Wilson, T. W., Wolf, M. J., and Zenker, J.: The Fifth International Workshop on Ice Nucleation phase 2 (FIN-02): laboratory intercomparison of ice nucleation measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6231–6257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6231-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-6231-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 25?><mixed-citation>Eastwood, M. L., Cremel, S., Wheeler, M., Murray, B. J., Girard, E., and Bertram, A. K.: Effects of sulfuric acid and ammonium sulfate coatings on the ice nucleation properties of kaolinite particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L02811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035997" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL035997</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 26?><mixed-citation>Fahey, D. W., Gao, R.-S., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schiller, C., Ebert, V., Krämer, M., Peter, T., Amarouche, N., Avallone, L. M., Bauer, R., Bozóki, Z., Christensen, L. E., Davis, S. M., Durry, G., Dyroff, C., Herman, R. L., Hunsmann, S., Khaykin, S. M., Mackrodt, P., Meyer, J., Smith, J. B., Spelten, N., Troy, R. F., Vömel, H., Wagner, S., and Wienhold, F. G.: The AquaVIT-1 intercomparison of atmospheric water vapor measurement techniques, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3177–3213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3177-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-3177-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 27?><mixed-citation>Fowler, K., Connolly, P., and Topping, D.: Modelling the effect of condensed-phase diffusion on the homogeneous nucleation of ice in ultra-viscous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 683–698, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-683-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-683-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation> Fukuta, N.: Activation of Atmospheric Particles as Ice Nuclei in Cold and Dry Air, J. Atmos. Sci., 23, 741–750, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 29?><mixed-citation>Garimella, S., Kristensen, T. B., Ignatius, K., Welti, A., Voigtländer, J., Kulkarni, G. R., Sagan, F., Kok, G. L., Dorsey, J., Nichman, L., Rothenberg, D. A., Rösch, M., Kirchgäßner, A. C. R., Ladkin, R., Wex, H., Wilson, T. W., Ladino, L. A., Abbatt, J. P. D., Stetzer, O., Lohmann, U., Stratmann, F., and Cziczo, D. J.: The SPectrometer for Ice Nuclei (SPIN): an instrument to investigate ice nucleation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2781–2795, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2781-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-2781-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 30?><mixed-citation>Gong, X., Wex, H., van Pinxteren, M., Triesch, N., Fomba, K. W., Lubitz, J., Stolle, C., Robinson, T.-B., Müller, T., Herrmann, H., and Stratmann, F.: Characterization of aerosol particles at Cabo Verde close to sea level and at the cloud level – Part 2: Ice-nucleating particles in air, cloud and seawater, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1451–1468, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1451-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1451-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 31?><mixed-citation>Hartmann, M., Adachi, K., Eppers, O., Haas, C., Herber, A., Holzinger, R., Hünerbein, A., Jäkel, E., Jentzsch, C., van Pinxteren, M., Wex, H., Willmes, S., and Stratmann, F.: Wintertime Airborne Measurements of Ice Nucleating Particles in the High Arctic: A Hint to a Marine, Biogenic Source for Ice Nucleating Particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087770, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087770" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL087770</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 32?><mixed-citation>Hill, T. C. J., DeMott, P. J., Tobo, Y., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Moffett, B. F., Franc, G. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Sources of organic ice nucleating particles in soils, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7195–7211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 33?><mixed-citation> Hinds, W. C.: Aerosol Technology, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 34?><mixed-citation>Hoagland, K. D., Rosowski, J. R., Gretz, M. R., and Roemer, S. C.: Diatom extracellular polymeric substances: Functio<?pagebreak page13927?>n, fine structure, chemistry, and physiology, J. Phycol., 29, 537–566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1993.00537.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.0022-3646.1993.00537.x</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 35?><mixed-citation>Hop, H., Pearson, T., Nøst Hegseth, E., Kovacs, K. M., Wiencke, C., Kwasniewski, S., Eiane, K., Mehlum, F., Gulliksen, B., Wlodarska-Kowalczuk, M., Lydersen, C., Weslawski, J. M., and Cochrane, S.: The marine ecosystem of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, Polar Res., 21, 167–208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v21i1.6480" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/polar.v21i1.6480</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 36?><mixed-citation>Ickes, L., Porter, G. C. E., Wagner, R., Adams, M. P., Bierbauer, S., Bertram, A. K., Bilde, M., Christiansen, S., Ekman, A. M. L., Gorokhova, E., Höhler, K., Kiselev, A. A., Leck, C., Möhler, O., Murray, B. J., Schiebel, T., Ullrich, R., and Salter, M. E.: The ice-nucleating activity of Arctic sea surface microlayer samples and marine algal cultures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11089–11117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11089-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11089-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 37?><mixed-citation>Ignatius, K., Kristensen, T. B., Järvinen, E., Nichman, L., Fuchs, C., Gordon, H., Herenz, P., Hoyle, C. R., Duplissy, J., Garimella, S., Dias, A., Frege, C., Höppel, N., Tröstl, J., Wagner, R., Yan, C., Amorim, A., Baltensperger, U., Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Gallagher, M. W., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Worsnop, D., and Stratmann, F.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation of viscous secondary organic aerosol produced from ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6495–6509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6495-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-6495-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 38?><mixed-citation>Ikegami, M., Okada, K., Zaizen, Y., and Makino, Y.: Sea-Salt Particles in the Upper Tropical Troposphere, Tellus B, 46, 142–151, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1994.t01-1-00006.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0889.1994.t01-1-00006.x</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 39?><mixed-citation>Irish, V. E., Elizondo, P., Chen, J., Chou, C., Charette, J., Lizotte, M., Ladino, L. A., Wilson, T. W., Gosselin, M., Murray, B. J., Polishchuk, E., Abbatt, J. P. D., Miller, L. A., and Bertram, A. K.: Ice-nucleating particles in Canadian Arctic sea-surface microlayer and bulk seawater, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10583–10595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10583-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-10583-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 40?><mixed-citation>Irish, V. E., Hanna, S. J., Xi, Y., Boyer, M., Polishchuk, E., Ahmed, M., Chen, J., Abbatt, J. P. D., Gosselin, M., Chang, R., Miller, L. A., and Bertram, A. K.: Revisiting properties and concentrations of ice-nucleating particles in the sea surface microlayer and bulk seawater in the Canadian Arctic during summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7775–7787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7775-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7775-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 41?><mixed-citation>Iversen, K. R. and Seuthe, L.: Seasonal microbial processes in a high-latitude fjord (Kongsfjorden, Svalbard): I. Heterotrophic bacteria, picoplankton and nanoflagellates, Polar Biol., 34, 731–749, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-010-0929-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00300-010-0929-2</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 42?><mixed-citation>Johansson, O. N., Töpel, M., Pinder, M. I. M., Kourtchenko, O., Blomberg, A., Godhe, A., and Clarke, A. K.: Skeletonema marinoi as a new genetic model for marine chain-forming diatoms, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 5391, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41085-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-019-41085-5</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 43?><mixed-citation>Khvorostyanov, V. I. and Curry, J. A.: The theory of ice nucleation by heterogeneous freezing of deliquescent mixed CCN. Part I: Critical radius, energy, and nucleation rate, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2676–2691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/Jas3266.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/Jas3266.1</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 44?><mixed-citation>Kirpes, R. M., Bonanno, D., May, N. W., Fraund, M., Barget, A. J., Moffet, R. C., Ault, A. P., and Pratt, K. A.: Wintertime Arctic Sea Spray Aerosol Composition Controlled by Sea Ice Lead Microbiology, ACS Cent. Sci., 5, 1760–1767, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acscentsci.9b00541</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 45?><mixed-citation> Knopf, D. A., Alpert, P. A., Wang, B., and Aller, J. Y.: Stimulation of ice nucleation by marine diatoms, Nat. Geosci., 4, 88–90, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 46?><mixed-citation>Kong, X. R., Wolf, M. J., Roesch, M., Thomson, E. S., Bartels-Rausch, T., Alpert, P. A., Ammann, M., Prisle, N. L., and Cziczo, D. J.: A continuous flow diffusion chamber study of sea salt particles acting as cloud nuclei: deliquescence and ice nucleation, Tellus B, 70, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2018.1463806" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/16000889.2018.1463806</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 47?><mixed-citation>Kooistra, W. H. C. F., Sarno, D., Balzano, S., Gu, H. F., Andersen, R. A., and Zingone, A.: Global diversity and biogeography of Skeletonema species (Bacillariophyta), Protist, 159, 177–193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2007.09.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.protis.2007.09.004</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 51?><mixed-citation>Koop, T. and Zobrist, B.: Parameterizations for ice nucleation in biological and atmospheric systems, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 10839–10850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b914289d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b914289d</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 48?><mixed-citation>Koop, T., Luo, B. P., Biermann, U. M., Crutzen, P. J., and Peter, T.: Freezing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solutions at stratospheric temperatures: Nucleation statistics and experiments, J. Phys. Chem. A, 101, 1117–1133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9626531" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp9626531</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 49?><mixed-citation> Koop, T., Kapilashrami, A., Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Phase transitions of sea-salt/water mixtures at low temperatures: Implications for ozone chemistry in the polar marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 26393–26402, 2000a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 50?><mixed-citation> Koop, T., Luo, B. P., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–614, 2000b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 52?><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 53?><mixed-citation> Kulkarni, G. and Kok, G.: Mobile Ice Nucleus Spectrometer, Technical Report No. PNNL-21384, Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA, US, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 54?><mixed-citation>Ladino, L. A., Zhou, S., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Aljawhary, D., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Factors controlling the ice nucleating abilities of alpha-pinene SOA particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9041–9051, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021578" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd021578</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 55?><mixed-citation> Ladino, L. A., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., Si, M., Li, J., Miller, L. A., Schiller, C. L., Huffman, J. A., Aller, J. Y., Knopf, D. A., Bertram, A. K., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Addressing the ice nucleating abilities of marine aerosol: A combination of deposition mode laboratory and field measurements, Atmos. Environ., 132, 1–10, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 56?><mixed-citation>Ladino, L. A., Raga, G. B., Alvarez-Ospina, H., Andino-Enríquez, M. A., Rosas, I., Martínez, L., Salinas, E., Miranda, J., Ramírez-Díaz, Z., Figueroa, B., Chou, C., Bertram, A. K., Quintana, E. T., Maldonado, L. A., García-Reynoso, A., Si, M., and Irish, V. E.: Ice-nucleating particles in a coastal tropical site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6147–6165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6147-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6147-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 57?><mixed-citation>Leck, C. and Bigg, E. K.: Biogenic particles in the surface microlayer and overlaying atmosphere in the central Arctic Ocean during summer, Tellus B, 57, 305–316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2005.00148.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2005.00148.x</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 58?><mixed-citation>Lienhard, D. M., Huisman, A. J., Krieger, U. K., Rudich, Y., Marcolli, C., Luo, B. P., Bones, D. L., Reid, J. P., Lambe, A. T<?pagebreak page13928?>., Canagaratna, M. R., Davidovits, P., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Steimer, S. S., Koop, T., and Peter, T.: Viscous organic aerosol particles in the upper troposphere: diffusivity-controlled water uptake and ice nucleation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13599–13613, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13599-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-13599-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 59?><mixed-citation>Marcolli, C.: Deposition nucleation viewed as homogeneous or immersion freezing in pores and cavities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2071–2104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 60?><mixed-citation>Mason, R. H., Si, M., Li, J., Chou, C., Dickie, R., Toom-Sauntry, D., Pöhlker, C., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Ladino, L. A., Jones, K., Leaitch, W. R., Schiller, C. L., Abbatt, J. P. D., Huffman, J. A., and Bertram, A. K.: Ice nucleating particles at a coastal marine boundary layer site: correlations with aerosol type and meteorological conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12547–12566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12547-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12547-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 61?><mixed-citation>Maturilli, M.: Continuous meteorological observations at station Ny-Ålesund (2017-07). Alfred Wegener Institute – Research Unit Potsdam, PANGAEA  [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.894601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.894601</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 62?><mixed-citation> McCluskey, C. S., Hill, T. C. J., Malfatti, F., Sultana, C. M., Lee, C., Santander, M. V., Beall, C. M., Moore, K. A., Cornwell, G. C., Collins, D. B., Prather, K. A., Jayarathne, T., Stone, E. A., Azam, F., Kreidenweis, S. M., and DeMott, P. J.: A Dynamic Link between Ice Nucleating Particles Released in Nascent Sea Spray Aerosol and Oceanic Biological Activity during Two Mesocosm Experiments, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 151–166, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 63?><mixed-citation>McCluskey, C. S., Hill, T. C. J., Humphries, R. S., Rauker, A. M., Moreau, S., Strutton, P. G., Chambers, S. D., Williams, A. G., McRobert, I., Ward, J., Keywood, M. D., Harnwell, J., Ponsonby, W., Loh, Z. M., Krummel, P. B., Protat, A., Kreidenweis, S. M., and DeMott, P. J.: Observations of Ice Nucleating Particles Over Southern Ocean Waters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 11989–11997, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL079981</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 64?><mixed-citation>McCluskey, C. S., Hill, T. C. J., Sultana, C. M., Laskina, O., Trueblood, J., Santander, M. V., Beall, C. M., Michaud, J. M., Kreidenweis, S. M., Prather, K. A., Grassian, V., and DeMott, P. J.: A Mesocosm Double Feature: Insights into the Chemical Makeup of Marine Ice Nucleating Particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 2405–2423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0155.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-17-0155.1</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 65?><mixed-citation> Middelburg, J. J.: Primary Production: From Inorganic to Organic Carbon, in: Marine Carbon Biogeochemistry. SpringerBriefs in Earth System Sciences, Springer, Cham, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 66?><mixed-citation>Mühlenbruch, M., Grossart, H.-P., Eigemann, F., and Voss, M.: Mini-review: Phytoplankton-derived polysaccharides in the marine environment and their interactions with heterotrophic bacteria, Environ. Microbiol., 20, 2671–2685, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/1462-2920.14302</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 67?><mixed-citation> Murphy, D. M. and Koop, T.: Review of the vapour pressures of ice and supercooled water for atmospheric applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1539–1565, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 68?><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Froyd, K. D., Bian, H., Brock, C. A., Dibb, J. E., DiGangi, J. P., Diskin, G., Dollner, M., Kupc, A., Scheuer, E. M., Schill, G. P., Weinzierl, B., Williamson, C. J., and Yu, P.: The distribution of sea-salt aerosol in the global troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4093–4104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4093-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-4093-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 69?><mixed-citation> Murray, B. J., Wilson, T. W., Dobbie, S., Cui, Z., Al-Jumur, S. M. R. K., Möhler, O., Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., Benz, S., Niemand, M., Saathoff, H., Ebert, V., Wagner, S., and Kärcher, B.: Heterogeneous nucleation of ice particles on glassy aerosols under cirrus conditions, Nat. Geosci., 3, 233–237, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 70?><mixed-citation> Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Hoose, C., Connolly, P., Klein, H., Bingemer, H., DeMott, P., Skrotzki, J., and Leisner, T.: A Particle-Surface-Area-Based Parameterization of Immersion Freezing on Desert Dust Particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3077–3092, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 71?><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Ovadnevaite, J., Bialek, J., Stengel, D. B., Zacharias, M., Nitschke, U., Connan, S., Rinaldi, M., Fuzzi, S., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Marullo, S., Santoleri, R., Dell'Anno, A., Corinaldesi, C., Tangherlini, M., and Danovaro, R.: Connecting marine productivity to sea-spray via nanoscale biological processes: Phytoplankton Dance or Death Disco?, Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 14883, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14883" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep14883</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 72?><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C. D., Facchini, M. C., Cavalli, F., Ceburnis, D., Mircea, M., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Yoon, Y. J., and Putaud, J. P.: Biogenically driven organic contribution to marine aerosol, Nature, 431, 676–680, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature02959" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/Nature02959</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 73?><mixed-citation>Peckhaus, A., Kiselev, A., Wagner, R., Duft, D., and Leisner, T.: Temperature-dependent formation of NaCl dihydrate in levitated NaCl and sea salt aerosol particles, J. Chem. Phys., 145, 244503, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972589" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4972589</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 74?><mixed-citation> Prather, K. A., Bertram, T. H., Grassian, V. H., Deane, G. B., Stokes, M. D., DeMott, P. J., Aluwihare, L. I., Palenik, B. P., Azam, F., Seinfeld, J. H., Moffet, R. C., Molina, M. J., Cappa, C. D., Geiger, F. M., Roberts, G. C., Russell, L. M., Ault, A. P., Baltrusaitis, J., Collins, D. B., Corrigan, C. E., Cuadra-Rodriguez, L. A., Ebben, C. J., Forestieri, S. D., Guasco, T. L., Hersey, S. P., Kim, M. J., Lambert, W. F., Modini, R. L., Mui, W., Pedler, B. E., Ruppel, M. J., Ryder, O. S., Schoepp, N. G., Sullivan, R. C., and Zhao, D. F.: Bringing the ocean into the laboratory to probe the chemical complexity of sea spray aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 7550–7555, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 75?><mixed-citation> Price, H. C., Mattsson, J., Zhang, Y., Bertram, A. K., Davies, J. F., Grayson, J. W., Martin, S. T., O'Sullivan, D., Reid, J. P., Rickards, A. M. J., and Murray, B. J.: Water diffusion in atmospherically relevant alpha-pinene secondary organic material, Chem. Sci., 6, 4876–4883, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 76?><mixed-citation>Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Schulz, K. S., Coffman, D. J., Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Keene, W. C., and Kieber, D. J.: Contribution of sea surface carbon pool to organic matter enrichment in sea spray aerosol, Nat. Geosci., 7, 228–232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2092</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 77?><mixed-citation>Reid, J. P., Bertram, A. K., Topping, D. O., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Petters, M. D., Pope, F. D., and Rovelli, G.: The viscosity of atmospherically relevant organic particles, Nat. Commun., 9, 956, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03027-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-03027-z</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 78?><mixed-citation>Righetti, D., Vogt, M., Gruber, N., Psomas, A., and Zimmermann, N. E.: Global pattern of phytoplankton diversity driven by temperature and environmental variability, Science Advances, 5, eaau6253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau6253" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aau6253</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 79?><mixed-citation> Rogers, D. C.: Development of a continuous flow thermal gradient diffusion chamber for ice nucleation studies, Atmos. Res., 22, 149–181, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page13929?><ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 80?><mixed-citation>Saravanan, V. and Godhe, A.: Genetic heterogeneity and physiological variation among seasonally separated clones of Skeletonema marinoi (Bacillariophyceae) in the Gullmar Fjord, Sweden, Eur. J. Phycol., 45, 177–190, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09670260903445146" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/09670260903445146</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 81?><mixed-citation> Schill, G. P. and Tolbert, M. A.: Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation on Simulated Sea-Spray Aerosol Using Raman Microscopy, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 29234–29241, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 82?><mixed-citation>Schnaiter, M., Büttner, S., Möhler, O., Skrotzki, J., Vragel, M., and Wagner, R.: Influence of particle size and shape on the backscattering linear depolarisation ratio of small ice crystals – cloud chamber measurements in the context of contrail and cirrus microphysics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10465–10484, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10465-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10465-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 83?><mixed-citation>Schneider, J., Höhler, K., Heikkilä, P., Keskinen, J.,
Bertozzi, B., Bogert, P., Schorr, T., Umo, N. S., Vogel, F., Brasseur, Z., Wu,
Y., Hakala, S., Duplissy, J., Moisseev, D., Kulmala, M., Adams, M. P., Murray,
B. J., Korhonen, K., Hao, L., Thomson, E. S., Castarède, D., Leisner, T.,
Petäjä, T., and Möhler, O.: The seasonal cycle of ice-nucleating
particles linked to the abundance of biogenic aerosol in boreal forests,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3899–3918, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3899-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-3899-2021</ext-link>,
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 84?><mixed-citation> Schnell, R. C. and Vali, G.: Freezing Nuclei in Marine Waters, Tellus, 27, 321–323, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 85?><mixed-citation>Shilling, J. E., Fortin, T. J., and Tolbert, M. A.: Depositional ice nucleation on crystalline organic and inorganic solids, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D12204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006664" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006664</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 86?><mixed-citation>Stenow, R., Olofsson, M., Robertson, E. K., Kourtchenko, O., Whitehouse, M. J., Ploug, H., and Godhe, A.: Resting Stages of Skeletonema marinoi Assimilate Nitrogen From the Ambient Environment Under Dark, Anoxic Conditions, J. Phycol., 56, 699–708, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12975" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/jpy.12975</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 87?><mixed-citation> Sun, X., Wang, H., Shen, J., and Liu, W.: Depolarization of Light Backscattering by Randomly Oriented Spheroids with Inclusions, J. Electromagnet. Wave., 25, 1448–1458, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 88?><mixed-citation>Svendsen, H., Beszczynska-Møller, A., Hagen, J. O., Lefauconnier, B., Tverberg, V., Gerland, S., Børre Ørbæk, J., Bischof, K., Papucci, C., Zajaczkowski, M., Azzolini, R., Bruland, O., and Wiencke, C.: The physical environment of Kongsfjorden–Krossfjorden, an Arctic fjord system in Svalbard, Polar Res., 21, 133–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v21i1.6479" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/polar.v21i1.6479</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 89?><mixed-citation>Tang, I. N. and Munkelwitz, H. R.: Composition and Temperature-Dependence of the Deliquescence Properties of Hygroscopic Aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 27A, 467–473, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90204-C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0960-1686(93)90204-C</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 90?><mixed-citation> Tang, I. N., Tridico, A. C., and Fung, K. H.: Thermodynamic and optical properties of sea salt aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 23269–23275, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 91?><mixed-citation>Tesson, S. V. M. and Šantl-Temkiv, T.: Ice Nucleation Activity and Aeolian Dispersal Success in Airborne and Aquatic Microalgae, Front. Microbiol., 9, 2681, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02681" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2018.02681</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 92?><mixed-citation>Thornton, D. C. O.: Dissolved organic matter (DOM) release by phytoplankton in the contemporary and future ocean, Eur. J. Phycol., 49, 20–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2013.875596" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/09670262.2013.875596</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 93?><mixed-citation> Ullrich, R., Hoose, C., Möhler, O., Niemand, M., Wagner, R., Höhler, K., Hiranuma, N., Saathoff, H., and Leisner, T.: A New Ice Nucleation Active Site Parameterization for Desert Dust and Soot, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 699–717, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 94?><mixed-citation> Vali, G.: Quantitative Evaluation of Experimental Results on Heterogeneous Freezing Nucleation of Supercooled Liquids, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 402–409, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 95?><mixed-citation>Vali, G., DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., and Whale, T. F.: Technical Note: A proposal for ice nucleation terminology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10263–10270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 96?><mixed-citation>van de Poll, W. H., Kulk, G., Rozema, P. D., Brussaard, C. P. D., Visser, R. J. W., and Buma, A. G. J.: Contrasting glacial meltwater effects on post-bloom phytoplankton on temporal and spatial scales in Kongsfjorden, Spitsbergen, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.307" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.307</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 97?><mixed-citation>van Pinxteren, M., Barthel, S., Fomba, K. W., Müller, K., von Tümpling, W., and Herrmann, H.: The influence of environmental drivers on the enrichment of organic carbon in the sea surface microlayer and in submicron aerosol particles – measurements from the Atlantic Ocean, Elem. Sci. Anth., 5, 35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.225" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.225</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 98?><mixed-citation>Wagner, R., Benz, S., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., and Schurath, U.: Probing ice clouds by broadband mid-infrared extinction spectroscopy: case studies from ice nucleation experiments in the AIDA aerosol and cloud chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4775–4800, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4775-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4775-2006</ext-link> 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 99?><mixed-citation> Wagner, R., Möhler, O., and Schnaiter, M.: Infrared Optical Constants of Crystalline Sodium Chloride Dihydrate: Application to Study the Crystallization of Aqueous Sodium Chloride Solution Droplets at Low Temperatures, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 8557–8571, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 100?><mixed-citation>Wagner, R., Höhler, K., Huang, W., Kiselev, A., Möhler, O., Mohr, C., Pajunoja, A., Saathoff, H., Schiebel, T., Shen, X. L., and Virtanen, A.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA particles before and after ice cloud processing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4924–4943, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 101?><mixed-citation> Wagner, R., Kaufmann, J., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Ullrich, R., and Leisner, T.: Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation Ability of NaCl and Sea Salt Aerosol Particles at Cirrus Temperatures, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2841–2860, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 102?><mixed-citation>Wagner, R., Bertozzi, B., Höpfner, M., Höhler, K., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., and Leisner, T.: Solid ammonium nitrate aerosols as efficient ice nucleating particles at cirrus temperatures, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD032248, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032248" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD032248</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 103?><mixed-citation>Wagner, R., Ickes, L., Bertram, A. K., Els, N., Gorokhova, E., Möhler, O., Murray, B. J., Umo, N. S., and Salter, M. E.: Data sets for the research article “Heterogeneous ice nucleation ability of aerosol particles generated from Arctic sea surface microlayer and surface seawater samples at cirrus temperatures” by Wagner et al. (2021) in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, KITopen [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000136010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5445/IR/1000136010</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 105?><mixed-citation>Wang, B. B., Knopf, D. A., China, S., Arey, B. W., Harder, T. H., Gilles, M. K., and Laskin, A.: Direct observation of ice nucleation events on individual atmospheric particles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 29721–29731, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp05253c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c6cp05253c</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 104?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Sultana, C. M., Trueblood, J., Hill, T. C. J., Malfatti, F., Lee, C., Laskina, O., Moore, K. A., Beall, C. M., McCluskey, C. S., Cornwell, G. C., Zhou, Y., Cox, J. L., Pendergraft, M. A., Santander, M. V., Bertram, T. H., Cappa, C. D., Azam, F., DeMott, P. J., Grassian, V. H., <?pagebreak page13930?>and Prather, K. A.: Microbial Control of Sea Spray Aerosol Composition: A Tale of Two Blooms, ACS Cent. Sci., 1, 124–131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.5b00148" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acscentsci.5b00148</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 106?><mixed-citation>Welti, A., Bigg, E. K., DeMott, P. J., Gong, X., Hartmann, M., Harvey, M., Henning, S., Herenz, P., Hill, T. C. J., Hornblow, B., Leck, C., Löffler, M., McCluskey, C. S., Rauker, A. M., Schmale, J., Tatzelt, C., van Pinxteren, M., and Stratmann, F.: Ship-based measurements of ice nuclei concentrations over the Arctic, Atlantic, Pacific and Southern oceans, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15191–15206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15191-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-15191-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 107?><mixed-citation>Wex, H., Huang, L., Zhang, W., Hung, H., Traversi, R., Becagli, S., Sheesley, R. J., Moffett, C. E., Barrett, T. E., Bossi, R., Skov, H., Hünerbein, A., Lubitz, J., Löffler, M., Linke, O., Hartmann, M., Herenz, P., and Stratmann, F.: Annual variability of ice-nucleating particle concentrations at different Arctic locations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5293–5311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5293-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-5293-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 108?><mixed-citation>Wiencke, C. and Hop, H.: Ecosystem Kongsfjorden: new views after more than a decade of research, Polar Biol., 39, 1679–1687, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-016-2032-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00300-016-2032-9</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><?label 109?><mixed-citation>Wilbourn, E. K., Thornton, D. C. O., Ott, C., Graff, J., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Betha, R., Russell, L. M., Behrenfeld, M. J., and Brooks, S. D.: Ice Nucleation by Marine Aerosols Over the North Atlantic Ocean in Late Spring, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030913" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD030913</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><?label 110?><mixed-citation>Wilson, T. W., Murray, B. J., Wagner, R., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Skrotzki, J., Price, H. C., Malkin, T. L., Dobbie, S., and Al-Jumur, S. M. R. K.: Glassy aerosols with a range of compositions nucleate ice heterogeneously at cirrus temperatures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8611–8632, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8611-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8611-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><?label 111?><mixed-citation>Wilson, T. W., Ladino, L. A., Alpert, P. A., Breckels, M. N., Brooks, I. M., Browse, J., Burrows, S. M., Carslaw, K. S., Huffman, J. A., Judd, C., Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., McFiggans, G., Miller, L. A., Najera, J. J., Polishchuk, E., Rae, S., Schiller, C. L., Si, M., Temprado, J. V., Whale, T. F., Wong, J. P. S., Wurl, O., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Abbatt, J. P. D., Aller, J. Y., Bertram, A. K., Knopf, D. A., and Murray, B. J.: A marine biogenic source of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles, Nature, 525, 234–238, 2015.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><?label 112?><mixed-citation>Wise, M. E., Baustian, K. J., Koop, T., Freedman, M. A., Jensen, E. J., and Tolbert, M. A.: Depositional ice nucleation onto crystalline hydrated NaCl particles: a new mechanism for ice formation in the troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1121–1134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1121-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1121-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><?label 113?><mixed-citation>Wolf, M. J., Coe, A., Dove, L. A., Zawadowicz, M. A., Dooley, K., Biller, S. J., Zhang, Y., Chisholm, S. W., and Cziczo, D. J.: Investigating the Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation of Sea Spray Aerosols Using Prochlorococcus as a Model Source of Marine Organic Matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 1139–1149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05150" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b05150</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><?label 114?><mixed-citation>Wolf, M. J., Goodell, M., Dong, E., Dove, L. A., Zhang, C., Franco, L. J., Shen, C., Rutkowski, E. G., Narducci, D. N., Mullen, S., Babbin, A. R., and Cziczo, D. J.: A link between the ice nucleation activity and the biogeochemistry of seawater, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15341–15356, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15341-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-15341-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><?label 115?><mixed-citation>Zäncker, B., Bracher, A., Röttgers, R., and Engel, A.: Variations of the Organic Matter Composition in the Sea Surface Microlayer: A Comparison between Open Ocean, Coastal, and Upwelling Sites Off the Peruvian Coast, Front. Microbiol., 8, 2369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02369" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2017.02369</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><?label 116?><mixed-citation>Zieger, P., Vaisanen, O., Corbin, J. C., Partridge, D. G., Bastelberger, S., Mousavi-Fard, M., Rosati, B., Gysel, M., Krieger, U. K., Leck, C., Nenes, A., Riipinen, I., Virtanen, A., and Salter, M. E.: Revising the hygroscopicity of inorganic sea salt particles, Nat. Commun., 8, 15883, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15883" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms15883</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><?label 117?><mixed-citation>Zimmermann, F., Ebert, M., Worringen, A., Schütz, L., and Weinbruch, S.: Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) as a new technique to determine the ice nucleation capability of individual atmospheric aerosol particles, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8219–8227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.023</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Heterogeneous ice nucleation ability of aerosol particles generated from Arctic sea surface microlayer and surface seawater samples at cirrus temperatures</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Sea spray aerosol particles are a recognised type of
ice-nucleating particles under mixed-phase cloud conditions. Entities that
are responsible for the heterogeneous ice nucleation ability include intact
or fragmented cells of marine microorganisms as well as organic matter
released by cell exudation. Only a small fraction of sea spray aerosol is
transported to the upper troposphere, but there are indications from
mass-spectrometric analyses of the residuals of sublimated cirrus particles
that sea salt could also contribute to heterogeneous ice nucleation under
cirrus conditions. Experimental studies on the heterogeneous ice nucleation
ability of sea spray aerosol particles and their proxies at temperatures
below 235&thinsp;K are still scarce. In our article, we summarise previous
measurements and present a new set of ice nucleation experiments at cirrus
temperatures with particles generated from sea surface microlayer and
surface seawater samples collected in three different regions of the Arctic
and from a laboratory-grown diatom culture (<i>Skeletonema marinoi</i>). The particles were suspended in the Aerosol Interaction and Dynamics in the Atmosphere (AIDA) cloud chamber and ice formation was induced by expansion cooling. We confirmed that under cirrus conditions, apart from the
ice-nucleating entities mentioned above, also crystalline inorganic salt
constituents can contribute to heterogeneous ice formation. This takes place
at temperatures below 220&thinsp;K, where we observed in all experiments a strong
immersion freezing mode due to the only partially deliquesced inorganic
salts. The inferred ice nucleation active surface site densities for this
nucleation mode reached a maximum of about 5×10<sup>10</sup>&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>
at an ice saturation ratio of 1.3. Much smaller densities in the range of
10<sup>8</sup>–10<sup>9</sup> m<sup>−2</sup> were observed at temperatures between 220 and
235&thinsp;K, where the inorganic salts fully deliquesced and only the organic
matter and/or algal cells and cell debris could contribute to heterogeneous
ice formation. These values are 2 orders of magnitude smaller than those previously reported for particles generated from microlayer suspensions
collected in temperate and subtropical zones. While this difference might
simply underline the strong variability of the number of ice-nucleating entities in the sea surface microlayer across different geographical regions, we also discuss how instrumental parameters like the aerosolisation
method and the ice nucleation measurement technique might affect the comparability of the results amongst different studies.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation> Alpert, P. A., Aller, J. Y., and Knopf, D. A.: Initiation of the ice phase by marine biogenic surfaces in supersaturated gas and supercooled aqueous phases, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 19882–19894, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alpert, P. A., Aller, J. Y., and Knopf, D. A.: Ice nucleation from aqueous
NaCl droplets with and without marine diatoms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
5539–5555, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5539-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5539-2011</a>, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Ault, A. P., Moffet, R. C., Baltrusaitis, J., Collins, D. B., Ruppel, M. J., Cuadra-Rodriguez, L. A., Zhao, D. F., Guasco, T. L., Ebben, C. J., Geiger, F. M., Bertram, T. H., Prather, K. A., and Grassian, V. H.: Size-Dependent Changes in Sea Spray Aerosol Composition and Properties with Different Seawater Conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 5603–5612, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Coffman, D. J., Johnson, J. E., Upchurch, L., Saliba, G., Lewis, S., Graff, J., Russell, L. M., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Variability in Marine Plankton Ecosystems Are Not Observed in Freshly Emitted Sea Spray Aerosol Over the North Atlantic Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085938, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085938" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085938</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Berkemeier, T., Shiraiwa, M., Pöschl, U., and Koop, T.: Competition between water uptake and ice nucleation by glassy organic aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12513–12531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12513-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12513-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation> Bigg, E. K.: Ice Nucleus Concentrations in Remote Areas, J. Atmos. Sci., 30, 1153–1157, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation> Blanchard, D. C.: Sea-to-Air Transport of Surface Active Material, Science, 146, 396–397, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3642.396" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3642.396</a>, 1964.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation> Blanchard, D. C.: The Ejection of Drops from the Sea and Their Enrichment with Bacteria and Other Materials: A Review, Estuaries, 12, 127–137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1351816" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/1351816</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> Bodsworth, A., Zobrist, B., and Bertram, A. K.: Inhibition of efflorescence in mixed organic-inorganic particles at temperatures less than 250&thinsp;K, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 12, 12259–12266, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation> Booth, B. C. and Horner, R. A.: Microalgae on the arctic ocean section, 1994: species abundance and biomass, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 44, 1607–1622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(97)00057-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(97)00057-X</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> Braban, C. F., Abbatt, J. P. D., and Cziczo, D. J.: Deliquescence of ammonium sulfate particles at sub-eutectic temperatures, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3879–3882, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013175" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013175</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation> Campbell, J. M., Meldrum, F. C., and Christenson, H. K.: Observing the formation of ice and organic crystals in active sites, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 810–815, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617717114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617717114</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Ceburnis, D., Garbaras, A., Szidat, S., Rinaldi, M., Fahrni, S., Perron, N., Wacker, L., Leinert, S., Remeikis, V., Facchini, M. C., Prevot, A. S. H., Jennings, S. G., Ramonet, M., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Quantification of the carbonaceous matter origin in submicron marine aerosol by <sup>13</sup>C and <sup>14</sup>C isotope analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8593–8606, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8593-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8593-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation> Ceburnis, D., Masalaite, A., Ovadnevaite, J., Garbaras, A., Remeikis, V., Maenhaut, W., Claeys, M., Sciare, J., Baisnée, D., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Stable isotopes measurements reveal dual carbon pools contributing to organic matter enrichment in marine aerosol, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 36675, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36675" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36675</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> China, S., Alpert, P. A., Zhang, B., Schum, S., Dzepina, K., Wright, K., Owen, R. C., Fialho, P., Mazzoleni, L. R., Mazzoleni, C., and Knopf, D. A.: Ice cloud formation potential by free tropospheric particles from long-range transport over the Northern Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 3065–3079, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025817" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025817</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation> Christiansen, S., Salter, M. E., Gorokhova, E., Nguyen, Q. T., and Bilde, M.: Sea Spray Aerosol Formation: Laboratory Results on the Role of Air Entrainment, Water Temperature, and Phytoplankton Biomass, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 13107–13116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04078" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04078</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation> Cornwell, G., Sultana, C., Prank, M., Cochran, R., Hill, T., Schill, G., DeMott, P., Mahowald, N., and Prather, K.: Ejection of dust from the ocean as a potential source of marine ice nucleating particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD033073, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033073</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Creamean, J. M., Cross, J. N., Pickart, R., McRaven, L., Lin, P., Pacini, A., Hanlon, R., Schmale, D. G., Ceniceros, J., Aydell, T., Colombi, N., Bolger, E., and DeMott, P. J.: Ice Nucleating Particles Carried From Below a Phytoplankton Bloom to the Arctic Atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8572–8581, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083039</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> Cunliffe, M., Engel, A., Frka, S., Gasparovic, B., Guitart, C., Murrell, J. C., Salter, M., Stolle, C., Upstill-Goddard, R., and Wurl, O.: Sea surface microlayers: A unified physicochemical and biological perspective of the air-ocean interface, Prog. Oceanogr., 109, 104–116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.08.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.08.004</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M. H., Zondlo, M. A., Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., and Murphy, D. M.: Clarifying the Dominant Sources and Mechanisms of Cirrus Cloud Formation, Science, 340, 1320–1324, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation> David, R. O., Marcolli, C., Fahrni, J., Qiu, Y. Q., Sirkin, Y. A. P., Molinero, V., Mahrt, F., Bruhwiler, D., Lohmann, U., and Kanji, Z. A.: Pore condensation and freezing is responsible for ice formation below water saturation for porous particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 8184–8189, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813647116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813647116</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> DeLeon-Rodriguez, N., Lathem, T. L., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Barazesh, J. M., Anderson, B. E., Beyersdorf, A. J., Ziemba, L. D., Bergin, M., Nenes, A., and Konstantinidis, K. T.: Microbiome of the upper troposphere: Species composition and prevalence, effects of tropical storms, and atmospheric implications, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 2575, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212089110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212089110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation> DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., McCluskey, C. S., Prather, K. A., Collins, D. B., Sullivan, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Mason, R. H., Irish, V. E., Lee, T., Hwang, C. Y., Rhee, T. S., Snider, J. R., McMeeking, G. R., Dhaniyala, S., Lewis, E. R., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J., Lee, C., Sultana, C. M., Ault, A. P., Axson, J. L., Martinez, M. D., Venero, I., Santos-Figueroa, G., Stokes, M. D., Deane, G. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Grassian, V. H., Bertram, T. H., Bertram, A. K., Moffett, B. F., and Franc, G. D.: Sea spray aerosol as a unique source of ice nucleating particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5797–5803, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., Cziczo, D. J., Hiranuma, N., Petters, M. D., Petters, S. S., Belosi, F., Bingemer, H. G., Brooks, S. D., Budke, C., Burkert-Kohn, M., Collier, K. N., Danielczok, A., Eppers, O., Felgitsch, L., Garimella, S., Grothe, H., Herenz, P., Hill, T. C. J., Höhler, K., Kanji, Z. A., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Kristensen, T. B., Krüger, K., Kulkarni, G., Levin, E. J. T., Murray, B. J., Nicosia, A., O'Sullivan, D., Peckhaus, A., Polen, M. J., Price, H. C., Reicher, N., Rothenberg, D. A., Rudich, Y., Santachiara, G., Schiebel, T., Schrod, J., Seifried, T. M., Stratmann, F., Sullivan, R. C., Suski, K. J., Szakáll, M., Taylor, H. P., Ullrich, R., Vergara-Temprado, J., Wagner, R., Whale, T. F., Weber, D., Welti, A., Wilson, T. W., Wolf, M. J., and Zenker, J.: The Fifth International Workshop on Ice Nucleation phase 2 (FIN-02): laboratory intercomparison of ice nucleation measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6231–6257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6231-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6231-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation> Eastwood, M. L., Cremel, S., Wheeler, M., Murray, B. J., Girard, E., and Bertram, A. K.: Effects of sulfuric acid and ammonium sulfate coatings on the ice nucleation properties of kaolinite particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L02811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035997" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035997</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation> Fahey, D. W., Gao, R.-S., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schiller, C., Ebert, V., Krämer, M., Peter, T., Amarouche, N., Avallone, L. M., Bauer, R., Bozóki, Z., Christensen, L. E., Davis, S. M., Durry, G., Dyroff, C., Herman, R. L., Hunsmann, S., Khaykin, S. M., Mackrodt, P., Meyer, J., Smith, J. B., Spelten, N., Troy, R. F., Vömel, H., Wagner, S., and Wienhold, F. G.: The AquaVIT-1 intercomparison of atmospheric water vapor measurement techniques, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3177–3213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3177-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3177-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> Fowler, K., Connolly, P., and Topping, D.: Modelling the effect of condensed-phase diffusion on the homogeneous nucleation of ice in ultra-viscous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 683–698, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-683-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-683-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation> Fukuta, N.: Activation of Atmospheric Particles as Ice Nuclei in Cold and Dry Air, J. Atmos. Sci., 23, 741–750, 1966.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation> Garimella, S., Kristensen, T. B., Ignatius, K., Welti, A., Voigtländer, J., Kulkarni, G. R., Sagan, F., Kok, G. L., Dorsey, J., Nichman, L., Rothenberg, D. A., Rösch, M., Kirchgäßner, A. C. R., Ladkin, R., Wex, H., Wilson, T. W., Ladino, L. A., Abbatt, J. P. D., Stetzer, O., Lohmann, U., Stratmann, F., and Cziczo, D. J.: The SPectrometer for Ice Nuclei (SPIN): an instrument to investigate ice nucleation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2781–2795, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2781-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2781-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation> Gong, X., Wex, H., van Pinxteren, M., Triesch, N., Fomba, K. W., Lubitz, J., Stolle, C., Robinson, T.-B., Müller, T., Herrmann, H., and Stratmann, F.: Characterization of aerosol particles at Cabo Verde close to sea level and at the cloud level – Part 2: Ice-nucleating particles in air, cloud and seawater, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1451–1468, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1451-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1451-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation> Hartmann, M., Adachi, K., Eppers, O., Haas, C., Herber, A., Holzinger, R., Hünerbein, A., Jäkel, E., Jentzsch, C., van Pinxteren, M., Wex, H., Willmes, S., and Stratmann, F.: Wintertime Airborne Measurements of Ice Nucleating Particles in the High Arctic: A Hint to a Marine, Biogenic Source for Ice Nucleating Particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087770, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087770" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087770</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation> Hill, T. C. J., DeMott, P. J., Tobo, Y., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Moffett, B. F., Franc, G. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Sources of organic ice nucleating particles in soils, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7195–7211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation> Hinds, W. C.: Aerosol Technology, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation> Hoagland, K. D., Rosowski, J. R., Gretz, M. R., and Roemer, S. C.: Diatom extracellular polymeric substances: Function, fine structure, chemistry, and physiology, J. Phycol., 29, 537–566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1993.00537.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1993.00537.x</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation> Hop, H., Pearson, T., Nøst Hegseth, E., Kovacs, K. M., Wiencke, C., Kwasniewski, S., Eiane, K., Mehlum, F., Gulliksen, B., Wlodarska-Kowalczuk, M., Lydersen, C., Weslawski, J. M., and Cochrane, S.: The marine ecosystem of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, Polar Res., 21, 167–208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v21i1.6480" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v21i1.6480</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation> Ickes, L., Porter, G. C. E., Wagner, R., Adams, M. P., Bierbauer, S., Bertram, A. K., Bilde, M., Christiansen, S., Ekman, A. M. L., Gorokhova, E., Höhler, K., Kiselev, A. A., Leck, C., Möhler, O., Murray, B. J., Schiebel, T., Ullrich, R., and Salter, M. E.: The ice-nucleating activity of Arctic sea surface microlayer samples and marine algal cultures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11089–11117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11089-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11089-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ignatius, K., Kristensen, T. B., Järvinen, E., Nichman, L., Fuchs, C., Gordon, H., Herenz, P., Hoyle, C. R., Duplissy, J., Garimella, S., Dias, A., Frege, C., Höppel, N., Tröstl, J., Wagner, R., Yan, C., Amorim, A., Baltensperger, U., Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Gallagher, M. W., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Worsnop, D., and Stratmann, F.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation of viscous secondary organic aerosol produced from ozonolysis of <i>α</i>-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6495–6509, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6495-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6495-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation> Ikegami, M., Okada, K., Zaizen, Y., and Makino, Y.: Sea-Salt Particles in the Upper Tropical Troposphere, Tellus B, 46, 142–151, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1994.t01-1-00006.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1994.t01-1-00006.x</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Irish, V. E., Elizondo, P., Chen, J., Chou, C., Charette, J., Lizotte, M., Ladino, L. A., Wilson, T. W., Gosselin, M., Murray, B. J., Polishchuk, E., Abbatt, J. P. D., Miller, L. A., and Bertram, A. K.: Ice-nucleating particles in Canadian Arctic sea-surface microlayer and bulk seawater, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10583–10595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10583-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10583-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Irish, V. E., Hanna, S. J., Xi, Y., Boyer, M., Polishchuk, E., Ahmed, M., Chen, J., Abbatt, J. P. D., Gosselin, M., Chang, R., Miller, L. A., and Bertram, A. K.: Revisiting properties and concentrations of ice-nucleating particles in the sea surface microlayer and bulk seawater in the Canadian Arctic during summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7775–7787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7775-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7775-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation> Iversen, K. R. and Seuthe, L.: Seasonal microbial processes in a high-latitude fjord (Kongsfjorden, Svalbard): I. Heterotrophic bacteria, picoplankton and nanoflagellates, Polar Biol., 34, 731–749, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-010-0929-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-010-0929-2</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation> Johansson, O. N., Töpel, M., Pinder, M. I. M., Kourtchenko, O., Blomberg, A., Godhe, A., and Clarke, A. K.: Skeletonema marinoi as a new genetic model for marine chain-forming diatoms, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 5391, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41085-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41085-5</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation> Khvorostyanov, V. I. and Curry, J. A.: The theory of ice nucleation by heterogeneous freezing of deliquescent mixed CCN. Part I: Critical radius, energy, and nucleation rate, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2676–2691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/Jas3266.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/Jas3266.1</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation> Kirpes, R. M., Bonanno, D., May, N. W., Fraund, M., Barget, A. J., Moffet, R. C., Ault, A. P., and Pratt, K. A.: Wintertime Arctic Sea Spray Aerosol Composition Controlled by Sea Ice Lead Microbiology, ACS Cent. Sci., 5, 1760–1767, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00541</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation> Knopf, D. A., Alpert, P. A., Wang, B., and Aller, J. Y.: Stimulation of ice nucleation by marine diatoms, Nat. Geosci., 4, 88–90, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation> Kong, X. R., Wolf, M. J., Roesch, M., Thomson, E. S., Bartels-Rausch, T., Alpert, P. A., Ammann, M., Prisle, N. L., and Cziczo, D. J.: A continuous flow diffusion chamber study of sea salt particles acting as cloud nuclei: deliquescence and ice nucleation, Tellus B, 70, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2018.1463806" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2018.1463806</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation> Kooistra, W. H. C. F., Sarno, D., Balzano, S., Gu, H. F., Andersen, R. A., and Zingone, A.: Global diversity and biogeography of Skeletonema species (Bacillariophyta), Protist, 159, 177–193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2007.09.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2007.09.004</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation> Koop, T. and Zobrist, B.: Parameterizations for ice nucleation in biological and atmospheric systems, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 10839–10850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b914289d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b914289d</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation> Koop, T., Luo, B. P., Biermann, U. M., Crutzen, P. J., and Peter, T.: Freezing of HNO<sub>3</sub>∕H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>∕H<sub>2</sub>O solutions at stratospheric temperatures: Nucleation statistics and experiments, J. Phys. Chem. A, 101, 1117–1133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9626531" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9626531</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation> Koop, T., Kapilashrami, A., Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Phase transitions of sea-salt/water mixtures at low temperatures: Implications for ozone chemistry in the polar marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 26393–26402, 2000a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation> Koop, T., Luo, B. P., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–614, 2000b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation> Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation> Kulkarni, G. and Kok, G.: Mobile Ice Nucleus Spectrometer, Technical Report No. PNNL-21384, Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA, US, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation> Ladino, L. A., Zhou, S., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Aljawhary, D., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Factors controlling the ice nucleating abilities of alpha-pinene SOA particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9041–9051, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021578" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021578</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation> Ladino, L. A., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., Si, M., Li, J., Miller, L. A., Schiller, C. L., Huffman, J. A., Aller, J. Y., Knopf, D. A., Bertram, A. K., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Addressing the ice nucleating abilities of marine aerosol: A combination of deposition mode laboratory and field measurements, Atmos. Environ., 132, 1–10, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation> Ladino, L. A., Raga, G. B., Alvarez-Ospina, H., Andino-Enríquez, M. A., Rosas, I., Martínez, L., Salinas, E., Miranda, J., Ramírez-Díaz, Z., Figueroa, B., Chou, C., Bertram, A. K., Quintana, E. T., Maldonado, L. A., García-Reynoso, A., Si, M., and Irish, V. E.: Ice-nucleating particles in a coastal tropical site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6147–6165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6147-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6147-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation> Leck, C. and Bigg, E. K.: Biogenic particles in the surface microlayer and overlaying atmosphere in the central Arctic Ocean during summer, Tellus B, 57, 305–316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2005.00148.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2005.00148.x</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Lienhard, D. M., Huisman, A. J., Krieger, U. K., Rudich, Y., Marcolli, C., Luo, B. P., Bones, D. L., Reid, J. P., Lambe, A. T., Canagaratna, M. R., Davidovits, P., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Steimer, S. S., Koop, T., and Peter, T.: Viscous organic aerosol particles in the upper troposphere: diffusivity-controlled water uptake and ice nucleation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13599–13613, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13599-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13599-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Marcolli, C.: Deposition nucleation viewed as homogeneous or immersion freezing in pores and cavities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2071–2104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation> Mason, R. H., Si, M., Li, J., Chou, C., Dickie, R., Toom-Sauntry, D., Pöhlker, C., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Ladino, L. A., Jones, K., Leaitch, W. R., Schiller, C. L., Abbatt, J. P. D., Huffman, J. A., and Bertram, A. K.: Ice nucleating particles at a coastal marine boundary layer site: correlations with aerosol type and meteorological conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12547–12566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12547-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12547-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation> Maturilli, M.: Continuous meteorological observations at station Ny-Ålesund (2017-07). Alfred Wegener Institute – Research Unit Potsdam, PANGAEA  [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.894601" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.894601</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation> McCluskey, C. S., Hill, T. C. J., Malfatti, F., Sultana, C. M., Lee, C., Santander, M. V., Beall, C. M., Moore, K. A., Cornwell, G. C., Collins, D. B., Prather, K. A., Jayarathne, T., Stone, E. A., Azam, F., Kreidenweis, S. M., and DeMott, P. J.: A Dynamic Link between Ice Nucleating Particles Released in Nascent Sea Spray Aerosol and Oceanic Biological Activity during Two Mesocosm Experiments, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 151–166, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation> McCluskey, C. S., Hill, T. C. J., Humphries, R. S., Rauker, A. M., Moreau, S., Strutton, P. G., Chambers, S. D., Williams, A. G., McRobert, I., Ward, J., Keywood, M. D., Harnwell, J., Ponsonby, W., Loh, Z. M., Krummel, P. B., Protat, A., Kreidenweis, S. M., and DeMott, P. J.: Observations of Ice Nucleating Particles Over Southern Ocean Waters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 11989–11997, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079981</a>, 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation> McCluskey, C. S., Hill, T. C. J., Sultana, C. M., Laskina, O., Trueblood, J., Santander, M. V., Beall, C. M., Michaud, J. M., Kreidenweis, S. M., Prather, K. A., Grassian, V., and DeMott, P. J.: A Mesocosm Double Feature: Insights into the Chemical Makeup of Marine Ice Nucleating Particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 2405–2423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0155.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0155.1</a>, 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation> Middelburg, J. J.: Primary Production: From Inorganic to Organic Carbon, in: Marine Carbon Biogeochemistry. SpringerBriefs in Earth System Sciences, Springer, Cham, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation> Mühlenbruch, M., Grossart, H.-P., Eigemann, F., and Voss, M.: Mini-review: Phytoplankton-derived polysaccharides in the marine environment and their interactions with heterotrophic bacteria, Environ. Microbiol., 20, 2671–2685, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14302" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14302</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation> Murphy, D. M. and Koop, T.: Review of the vapour pressures of ice and supercooled water for atmospheric applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1539–1565, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation> Murphy, D. M., Froyd, K. D., Bian, H., Brock, C. A., Dibb, J. E., DiGangi, J. P., Diskin, G., Dollner, M., Kupc, A., Scheuer, E. M., Schill, G. P., Weinzierl, B., Williamson, C. J., and Yu, P.: The distribution of sea-salt aerosol in the global troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4093–4104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4093-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4093-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation> Murray, B. J., Wilson, T. W., Dobbie, S., Cui, Z., Al-Jumur, S. M. R. K., Möhler, O., Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., Benz, S., Niemand, M., Saathoff, H., Ebert, V., Wagner, S., and Kärcher, B.: Heterogeneous nucleation of ice particles on glassy aerosols under cirrus conditions, Nat. Geosci., 3, 233–237, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation> Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Hoose, C., Connolly, P., Klein, H., Bingemer, H., DeMott, P., Skrotzki, J., and Leisner, T.: A Particle-Surface-Area-Based Parameterization of Immersion Freezing on Desert Dust Particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3077–3092, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation> O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Ovadnevaite, J., Bialek, J., Stengel, D. B., Zacharias, M., Nitschke, U., Connan, S., Rinaldi, M., Fuzzi, S., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Marullo, S., Santoleri, R., Dell'Anno, A., Corinaldesi, C., Tangherlini, M., and Danovaro, R.: Connecting marine productivity to sea-spray via nanoscale biological processes: Phytoplankton Dance or Death Disco?, Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 14883, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14883" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14883</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation> O'Dowd, C. D., Facchini, M. C., Cavalli, F., Ceburnis, D., Mircea, M., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Yoon, Y. J., and Putaud, J. P.: Biogenically driven organic contribution to marine aerosol, Nature, 431, 676–680, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature02959" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature02959</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation> Peckhaus, A., Kiselev, A., Wagner, R., Duft, D., and Leisner, T.: Temperature-dependent formation of NaCl dihydrate in levitated NaCl and sea salt aerosol particles, J. Chem. Phys., 145, 244503, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972589" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972589</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation> Prather, K. A., Bertram, T. H., Grassian, V. H., Deane, G. B., Stokes, M. D., DeMott, P. J., Aluwihare, L. I., Palenik, B. P., Azam, F., Seinfeld, J. H., Moffet, R. C., Molina, M. J., Cappa, C. D., Geiger, F. M., Roberts, G. C., Russell, L. M., Ault, A. P., Baltrusaitis, J., Collins, D. B., Corrigan, C. E., Cuadra-Rodriguez, L. A., Ebben, C. J., Forestieri, S. D., Guasco, T. L., Hersey, S. P., Kim, M. J., Lambert, W. F., Modini, R. L., Mui, W., Pedler, B. E., Ruppel, M. J., Ryder, O. S., Schoepp, N. G., Sullivan, R. C., and Zhao, D. F.: Bringing the ocean into the laboratory to probe the chemical complexity of sea spray aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 7550–7555, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation> Price, H. C., Mattsson, J., Zhang, Y., Bertram, A. K., Davies, J. F., Grayson, J. W., Martin, S. T., O'Sullivan, D., Reid, J. P., Rickards, A. M. J., and Murray, B. J.: Water diffusion in atmospherically relevant alpha-pinene secondary organic material, Chem. Sci., 6, 4876–4883, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation> Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Schulz, K. S., Coffman, D. J., Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Keene, W. C., and Kieber, D. J.: Contribution of sea surface carbon pool to organic matter enrichment in sea spray aerosol, Nat. Geosci., 7, 228–232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2092" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2092</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation> Reid, J. P., Bertram, A. K., Topping, D. O., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Petters, M. D., Pope, F. D., and Rovelli, G.: The viscosity of atmospherically relevant organic particles, Nat. Commun., 9, 956, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03027-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03027-z</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation> Righetti, D., Vogt, M., Gruber, N., Psomas, A., and Zimmermann, N. E.: Global pattern of phytoplankton diversity driven by temperature and environmental variability, Science Advances, 5, eaau6253, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau6253" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau6253</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation> Rogers, D. C.: Development of a continuous flow thermal gradient diffusion chamber for ice nucleation studies, Atmos. Res., 22, 149–181, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation> Saravanan, V. and Godhe, A.: Genetic heterogeneity and physiological variation among seasonally separated clones of Skeletonema marinoi (Bacillariophyceae) in the Gullmar Fjord, Sweden, Eur. J. Phycol., 45, 177–190, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09670260903445146" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/09670260903445146</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation> Schill, G. P. and Tolbert, M. A.: Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation on Simulated Sea-Spray Aerosol Using Raman Microscopy, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 29234–29241, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Schnaiter, M., Büttner, S., Möhler, O., Skrotzki, J., Vragel, M., and Wagner, R.: Influence of particle size and shape on the backscattering linear depolarisation ratio of small ice crystals – cloud chamber measurements in the context of contrail and cirrus microphysics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10465–10484, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10465-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10465-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation> Schneider, J., Höhler, K., Heikkilä, P., Keskinen, J.,
Bertozzi, B., Bogert, P., Schorr, T., Umo, N. S., Vogel, F., Brasseur, Z., Wu,
Y., Hakala, S., Duplissy, J., Moisseev, D., Kulmala, M., Adams, M. P., Murray,
B. J., Korhonen, K., Hao, L., Thomson, E. S., Castarède, D., Leisner, T.,
Petäjä, T., and Möhler, O.: The seasonal cycle of ice-nucleating
particles linked to the abundance of biogenic aerosol in boreal forests,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3899–3918, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3899-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3899-2021</a>,
2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation> Schnell, R. C. and Vali, G.: Freezing Nuclei in Marine Waters, Tellus, 27, 321–323, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation> Shilling, J. E., Fortin, T. J., and Tolbert, M. A.: Depositional ice nucleation on crystalline organic and inorganic solids, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D12204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006664" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006664</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation> Stenow, R., Olofsson, M., Robertson, E. K., Kourtchenko, O., Whitehouse, M. J., Ploug, H., and Godhe, A.: Resting Stages of Skeletonema marinoi Assimilate Nitrogen From the Ambient Environment Under Dark, Anoxic Conditions, J. Phycol., 56, 699–708, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12975" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12975</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation> Sun, X., Wang, H., Shen, J., and Liu, W.: Depolarization of Light Backscattering by Randomly Oriented Spheroids with Inclusions, J. Electromagnet. Wave., 25, 1448–1458, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation> Svendsen, H., Beszczynska-Møller, A., Hagen, J. O., Lefauconnier, B., Tverberg, V., Gerland, S., Børre Ørbæk, J., Bischof, K., Papucci, C., Zajaczkowski, M., Azzolini, R., Bruland, O., and Wiencke, C.: The physical environment of Kongsfjorden–Krossfjorden, an Arctic fjord system in Svalbard, Polar Res., 21, 133–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v21i1.6479" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v21i1.6479</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation> Tang, I. N. and Munkelwitz, H. R.: Composition and Temperature-Dependence of the Deliquescence Properties of Hygroscopic Aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 27A, 467–473, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90204-C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90204-C</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation> Tang, I. N., Tridico, A. C., and Fung, K. H.: Thermodynamic and optical properties of sea salt aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 23269–23275, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation> Tesson, S. V. M. and Šantl-Temkiv, T.: Ice Nucleation Activity and Aeolian Dispersal Success in Airborne and Aquatic Microalgae, Front. Microbiol., 9, 2681, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02681" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02681</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation> Thornton, D. C. O.: Dissolved organic matter (DOM) release by phytoplankton in the contemporary and future ocean, Eur. J. Phycol., 49, 20–46, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2013.875596" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2013.875596</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation> Ullrich, R., Hoose, C., Möhler, O., Niemand, M., Wagner, R., Höhler, K., Hiranuma, N., Saathoff, H., and Leisner, T.: A New Ice Nucleation Active Site Parameterization for Desert Dust and Soot, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 699–717, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation> Vali, G.: Quantitative Evaluation of Experimental Results on Heterogeneous Freezing Nucleation of Supercooled Liquids, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 402–409, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Vali, G., DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., and Whale, T. F.: Technical Note: A proposal for ice nucleation terminology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10263–10270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation> van de Poll, W. H., Kulk, G., Rozema, P. D., Brussaard, C. P. D., Visser, R. J. W., and Buma, A. G. J.: Contrasting glacial meltwater effects on post-bloom phytoplankton on temporal and spatial scales in Kongsfjorden, Spitsbergen, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.307" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.307</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation> van Pinxteren, M., Barthel, S., Fomba, K. W., Müller, K., von Tümpling, W., and Herrmann, H.: The influence of environmental drivers on the enrichment of organic carbon in the sea surface microlayer and in submicron aerosol particles – measurements from the Atlantic Ocean, Elem. Sci. Anth., 5, 35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.225" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.225</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, R., Benz, S., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., and Schurath, U.: Probing ice clouds by broadband mid-infrared extinction spectroscopy: case studies from ice nucleation experiments in the AIDA aerosol and cloud chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4775–4800, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4775-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4775-2006</a> 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation> Wagner, R., Möhler, O., and Schnaiter, M.: Infrared Optical Constants of Crystalline Sodium Chloride Dihydrate: Application to Study the Crystallization of Aqueous Sodium Chloride Solution Droplets at Low Temperatures, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 8557–8571, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation> Wagner, R., Höhler, K., Huang, W., Kiselev, A., Möhler, O., Mohr, C., Pajunoja, A., Saathoff, H., Schiebel, T., Shen, X. L., and Virtanen, A.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation of <i>α</i>-pinene SOA particles before and after ice cloud processing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4924–4943, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation> Wagner, R., Kaufmann, J., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Ullrich, R., and Leisner, T.: Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation Ability of NaCl and Sea Salt Aerosol Particles at Cirrus Temperatures, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2841–2860, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation> Wagner, R., Bertozzi, B., Höpfner, M., Höhler, K., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., and Leisner, T.: Solid ammonium nitrate aerosols as efficient ice nucleating particles at cirrus temperatures, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD032248, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032248" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032248</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation> Wagner, R., Ickes, L., Bertram, A. K., Els, N., Gorokhova, E., Möhler, O., Murray, B. J., Umo, N. S., and Salter, M. E.: Data sets for the research article “Heterogeneous ice nucleation ability of aerosol particles generated from Arctic sea surface microlayer and surface seawater samples at cirrus temperatures” by Wagner et al. (2021) in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, KITopen [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000136010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000136010</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation> Wang, B. B., Knopf, D. A., China, S., Arey, B. W., Harder, T. H., Gilles, M. K., and Laskin, A.: Direct observation of ice nucleation events on individual atmospheric particles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 29721–29731, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp05253c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp05253c</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation> Wang, X., Sultana, C. M., Trueblood, J., Hill, T. C. J., Malfatti, F., Lee, C., Laskina, O., Moore, K. A., Beall, C. M., McCluskey, C. S., Cornwell, G. C., Zhou, Y., Cox, J. L., Pendergraft, M. A., Santander, M. V., Bertram, T. H., Cappa, C. D., Azam, F., DeMott, P. J., Grassian, V. H., and Prather, K. A.: Microbial Control of Sea Spray Aerosol Composition: A Tale of Two Blooms, ACS Cent. Sci., 1, 124–131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.5b00148" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.5b00148</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation> Welti, A., Bigg, E. K., DeMott, P. J., Gong, X., Hartmann, M., Harvey, M., Henning, S., Herenz, P., Hill, T. C. J., Hornblow, B., Leck, C., Löffler, M., McCluskey, C. S., Rauker, A. M., Schmale, J., Tatzelt, C., van Pinxteren, M., and Stratmann, F.: Ship-based measurements of ice nuclei concentrations over the Arctic, Atlantic, Pacific and Southern oceans, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15191–15206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15191-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15191-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation> Wex, H., Huang, L., Zhang, W., Hung, H., Traversi, R., Becagli, S., Sheesley, R. J., Moffett, C. E., Barrett, T. E., Bossi, R., Skov, H., Hünerbein, A., Lubitz, J., Löffler, M., Linke, O., Hartmann, M., Herenz, P., and Stratmann, F.: Annual variability of ice-nucleating particle concentrations at different Arctic locations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5293–5311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5293-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5293-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation> Wiencke, C. and Hop, H.: Ecosystem Kongsfjorden: new views after more than a decade of research, Polar Biol., 39, 1679–1687, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-016-2032-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-016-2032-9</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation> Wilbourn, E. K., Thornton, D. C. O., Ott, C., Graff, J., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Betha, R., Russell, L. M., Behrenfeld, M. J., and Brooks, S. D.: Ice Nucleation by Marine Aerosols Over the North Atlantic Ocean in Late Spring, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030913" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030913</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, T. W., Murray, B. J., Wagner, R., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Skrotzki, J., Price, H. C., Malkin, T. L., Dobbie, S., and Al-Jumur, S. M. R. K.: Glassy aerosols with a range of compositions nucleate ice heterogeneously at cirrus temperatures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8611–8632, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8611-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8611-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation> Wilson, T. W., Ladino, L. A., Alpert, P. A., Breckels, M. N., Brooks, I. M., Browse, J., Burrows, S. M., Carslaw, K. S., Huffman, J. A., Judd, C., Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., McFiggans, G., Miller, L. A., Najera, J. J., Polishchuk, E., Rae, S., Schiller, C. L., Si, M., Temprado, J. V., Whale, T. F., Wong, J. P. S., Wurl, O., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Abbatt, J. P. D., Aller, J. Y., Bertram, A. K., Knopf, D. A., and Murray, B. J.: A marine biogenic source of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles, Nature, 525, 234–238, 2015.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Wise, M. E., Baustian, K. J., Koop, T., Freedman, M. A., Jensen, E. J., and Tolbert, M. A.: Depositional ice nucleation onto crystalline hydrated NaCl particles: a new mechanism for ice formation in the troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1121–1134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1121-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1121-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation> Wolf, M. J., Coe, A., Dove, L. A., Zawadowicz, M. A., Dooley, K., Biller, S. J., Zhang, Y., Chisholm, S. W., and Cziczo, D. J.: Investigating the Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation of Sea Spray Aerosols Using Prochlorococcus as a Model Source of Marine Organic Matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 1139–1149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05150" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05150</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation> Wolf, M. J., Goodell, M., Dong, E., Dove, L. A., Zhang, C., Franco, L. J., Shen, C., Rutkowski, E. G., Narducci, D. N., Mullen, S., Babbin, A. R., and Cziczo, D. J.: A link between the ice nucleation activity and the biogeochemistry of seawater, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15341–15356, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15341-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15341-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation> Zäncker, B., Bracher, A., Röttgers, R., and Engel, A.: Variations of the Organic Matter Composition in the Sea Surface Microlayer: A Comparison between Open Ocean, Coastal, and Upwelling Sites Off the Peruvian Coast, Front. Microbiol., 8, 2369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02369" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02369</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation> Zieger, P., Vaisanen, O., Corbin, J. C., Partridge, D. G., Bastelberger, S., Mousavi-Fard, M., Rosati, B., Gysel, M., Krieger, U. K., Leck, C., Nenes, A., Riipinen, I., Virtanen, A., and Salter, M. E.: Revising the hygroscopicity of inorganic sea salt particles, Nat. Commun., 8, 15883, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15883" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15883</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation> Zimmermann, F., Ebert, M., Worringen, A., Schütz, L., and Weinbruch, S.: Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) as a new technique to determine the ice nucleation capability of individual atmospheric aerosol particles, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8219–8227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.023</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
