<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-1389-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Ambient nitro-aromatic compounds – biomass burning versus secondary
formation in rural China</article-title><alt-title>Ambient nitro-aromatic compounds</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Ambient nitro-aromatic compounds}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C.~M.~G.~Salvador et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Salvador</surname><given-names>Christian Mark Garcia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8328-7777</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Rongzhi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-6734</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Priestley</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6597-6608</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Linjie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0508-4947</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tsiligiannis</surname><given-names>Epameinondas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-0858</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff5">
          <name><surname>Le Breton</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Wenfei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>Limin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Hui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Ying</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Min</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-9123</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Song</given-names></name>
          <email>songguo@pku.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-2313</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hallquist</surname><given-names>Mattias</given-names></name>
          <email>hallq@chem.gu.se</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5691-1231</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shanghai, 200233, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, International Joint Laboratory for Regional Pollution Control, Ministry of Education (IJRC), College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, P. R. China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Volvo Group Trucks and Technology Method and Technical Development, Gothenburg, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Mattias Hallquist (hallq@chem.gu.se) and Song Guo
(songguo@pku.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>2</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1389</fpage><lpage>1406</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>August</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>24</day><month>September</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e219">Nitro-aromatic compounds (NACs) were measured hourly at a rural site in
China during wintertime to monitor the changes due to local and regional
impacts of biomass burning (BB). Concurrent and continuous measurements of
the concentrations of 16 NACs in the gas and particle phases were performed
with a time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS) equipped
with a Filter Inlet for
Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO) unit using iodide as the
reagent ion. NACs accounted for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the mass concentration of
organic matter (OM) and total particulate matter (PM), but the total
particle mass concentrations of these compounds can reach as high as 1000 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (299 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> avg), suggesting that they may contribute
significantly to the radiative forcing effects of atmospheric particles.
Levels of gas-phase NACs were highest during the daytime (15:00–16:00 local
time, LT), with a smaller night-time peak around 20:00 LT. Box-model
simulations showed that this occurred because the rate of NAC production
from gas-phase sources exceeded the rate of loss, which occurred mainly via
the OH reaction and to a lesser degree via photolysis. Data gathered during
extended periods with high contributions from primary BB sources (resulting
in 40 %–60 % increases in NAC concentrations) were used to characterize
individual NACs with respect to gas–particle partitioning and the
contributions of regional secondary processes (i.e. photochemical smog). On
days without extensive BB, secondary formation was the dominant source of
NACs, and NAC levels correlated strongly with the ambient ozone
concentration. Analyses of individual NACs in the regionally aged plumes
sampled on these days allowed precursors such as phenol and catechol to be
linked to their NAC derivatives (i.e. nitrophenol and nitrocatechol).
Correlation analysis using the high time resolution data and box-model
simulation results constrained the relationships between these compounds and
demonstrated the contribution of secondary formation processes. Furthermore,
13 of 16 NACS were classified according to primary or secondary formation
process. Primary emission was the dominant source (accounting for 60 %–70 %
of the measured concentrations) of 5 of the 16 studied NACs, but secondary
formation was also a significant source. Photochemical smog thus has
important effects on brown carbon levels even during wintertime periods
dominated by primary air pollution in rural China.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e265">Nitro-aromatic compounds (NACs) are aromatic compounds containing at least
one nitro (–NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) functional group attached directly to a benzene
ring. They are considered anthropogenic compounds; there is little or no
evidence of their formation from natural sources. The atmospheric<?pagebreak page1390?> production
and behaviour of NACs have attracted interest due to their role in the
formation of brown carbon (BrC) aerosols (Xie et al., 2017, 2019; Lin et al., 2016; Mohr et al., 2013; Kroflič et al., 2015).
Nitro-aromatic compounds such as nitrophenol (NP), nitrocatechol (NC), and
dinitrophenol (DNP) absorb light in the near-ultraviolet (UV) and visible
regions, which can cause positive radiative forcing (Zhang et
al., 2017). While NACs may constitute only a minor fraction of aerosols
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) (Mohr et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2017), they can account
for as much as 50 % of the light absorption coefficient of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) at 365 nm
(Xie et al., 2017). In addition to their roles as potential
climate forcers, NACs can adversely affect human health: exposure to
nitrophenol can cause blood disorders that retard the delivery of oxygen to
tissues and organs (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2015). The harmful effects of NACs
and their strong effects on radiation balances even at minute concentrations
necessitate a robust understanding of their atmospheric behaviour and
sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e287">The origins of atmospheric NACs can vary depending on the prevailing
atmospheric conditions and local levels of precursors and oxidants. Traffic
and biomass burning (BB) are the main sources of NACs (Inomata et al.,
2016; Perrone et al., 2014; Le Breton et al., 2019; Kitanovski et al., 2012b).
BB is considered a major driver of atmospheric NAC formation (Kahnt et
al., 2013; Laskin et al., 2015). Here, the combustion of coal and wood leads to thermal degradation and pyrolysis of lignins, which results in strong
emission of substituted phenols including 1,2-benzenediols (catechols) and
cresol/methylphenols, that in turn are precursors for the formation of NACs.
Accordingly, several lab and field studies have demonstrated the formation
of NACs originating from wood burning under various atmospheric conditions.
For instance, molecular characterization of aged BB plumes from a nationwide
bonfire festival revealed a suite of nitro-aromatic compounds that accounted
for 50 %–80 % of the total visible light absorption (Lin et
al., 2017). Additionally, combustion of pine under high flaming conditions
resulted in the emission of 8.1 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of NACs, primarily NC and NP
(Hoffmann et al., 2007). A total of 14 NAC species were detected in
laboratory simulations of open BB, with nitrocatechol having the highest
mass concentration regardless of the choice of wood fuel
(Xie et al., 2019). The same study reported a significant
contribution of NACs to absorption at 365 nm (Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating that
NACs are strong brown carbon (BrC) chromophores. Cloud water samples
collected during a period of extensive wheat straw burning at a mountain
site in North China also showed the presence of NP, NC, and their
derivatives (Desyaterik et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e311">The atmospheric abundance of NACs can also be attributed to secondary
oxidation of precursor aromatic compounds
(Yuan et al., 2016). The photooxidation
and subsequent nitration of benzene and toluene yield NP and
methylnitrophenol (MNP), respectively. Oxidation of precursors is initiated
by hydroxyl (OH) and nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) radicals, which can cause both
daytime and night-time formation of NACs. Wood burning processes also emit
significant quantities of aromatic compounds with OH substituents such as
phenol and catechol, which can be transformed into NP and NC under high
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions (Finewax et al., 2018). In the same way,
oxidation of mononitrates generates nitrophenoxy radicals and similar
compounds that produce DNP and other dinitrates. In most of these processes,
the ambient concentration of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the main determinant of the rate of
NAC formation until the system/site reaches a NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-saturated regime under which further increases in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels do not increase NAC
formation (Yuan et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2019). In addition to the
typical gas-phase photooxidation mechanism, NAC formation can occur via
aqueous-phase oxidation, which is favoured by a high atmospheric liquid
content and/or the presence of clouds that provide aqueous surfaces on which
oxidation reactions can proceed (Lüttke et al., 1997; Vione et al.,
2005). In China, it was calculated that domestic and open burning were
responsible for the emission of 640 t of NACs (Wang et al.,
2017). However, there is considerable uncertainty in this estimate because
the amount of material burned varies from year to year. Consequently, there
is a clear need for further studies on the emissions of nitro-aromatic
compounds in China.</p>
      <p id="d1e359">NACs are typically collected using aerosol filters over an extended period
(e.g. 12 h to 1 d). Particle-bound NACs can then be extracted and
analysed using gas chromatography followed by mass spectrometry
(Cecinato et al., 2005) or ultra-pressure/high-pressure liquid
chromatography (UP/HPLC) (Wang et al., 2018, 2019; Iinuma et
al., 2010; Finewax et al., 2018; Kahnt et al., 2013; Xie et al.,
2019; Kitanovski et al., 2012a, b). Recent advances in
measurement techniques have enabled fast and semi-continuous measurement of
NACs using a high-resolution time-of-flight chemical ionization mass
spectrometer (HR-ToF-CIMS) (Le Breton et al., 2019; Mohr et al., 2013; Yuan
et al., 2016; Gaston et al., 2016). The high resolving power of CIMS
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) has facilitated the detection of analytes
with very low detection limits. Additionally, by using a Filter Inlet for
Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO) unit, the concentrations of NACs and other
species in both the gas and aerosol phases can be analysed simultaneously
without need for sample preparation (e.g. by solvent extraction)
(Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2014; Gaston et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e382">In this work, the formation of gas- and particle-phase NACs in a rural area
of China was studied using a ToF-CIMS instrument with a FIGAERO unit. NACs were classified based on their similarity
to NP, NC, nitrobenzoic acid, and DNP. The measurements were performed in
Dezhou, China, where open burning of crop residues is a major source of
atmospheric pollutants (Wang et al., 2018). A
previous study conducted in this area recorded some of the highest levels of
emissions from open burning of crop residues ever observed in Shandong
Province (Gao et al., 2017), so it was<?pagebreak page1391?> expected that emissions
due to BB events would be captured during the study period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental design</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Site description</title>
      <p id="d1e400">Measurements were conducted in Dezhou, Shandong Province, China
(37.4341<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116.3575<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), as part of the
“Photochemical Smog in China” project, which aims to evaluate haze
formation in China and its implications for air quality policies
(Hallquist et al., 2016). Instrumental measurements were performed at the
Meteorological Weather Bureau of Pingyuan from November 2017 to January 2018. This season is of specific interest because previous wintertime
measurements in this area have indicated that NACs can contribute as much as
50 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to the mass concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (particulate matter). The temperature and
relative humidity during the measurement period ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.7 to
20.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and from 129 %–99 %, with campaign averages of 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 50 %, respectively. The wind speed averaged 2.4 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; a time series of the metrological conditions during the
experimental campaign is shown in Fig. 1. The daytime mass concentration
of particulate matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured with an aerosol mass
spectrometer typically exceeded the European Air Quality allowable limit for
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and there were more than 10 pollution
episodes with high aerosol loadings (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Organic matter comprised 60 % of the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on average, and it
contributed as much as 80 % in several field measurements. Inorganic
nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounted for 20 % of the measured PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels on average. The diurnal profiles of total particulate matter and
organic matter were similar, with two distinct peaks at 08:00 and 19:00
(LT) (Fig. 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e582"><bold>(a)</bold> Time series profiles of organic matter (OM)
and total particulate matter (PM) concentrations during the field campaign.
The red reference line at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> represents a typical
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass limit. <bold>(b)</bold> Contribution of different aerosol
components to particulate mass concentration as measured with an aerosol
mass spectrometer (AMS). <bold>(c)</bold> Diurnal variation in levels of organic
and total particulate matter during the wintertime measurement period in
Dezhou. Error bars indicate standard errors. Time series of <bold>(d)</bold> temperature and relative humidity (RH) and <bold>(e)</bold> aromatic VOCs such
as benzene, toluene, and trimethylbenzene. Also included in the figure are
<bold>(f)</bold> the mixing ratio of acetonitrile (ACN) and <bold>(g</bold>) the
rate of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis, expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1389/2021/acp-21-1389-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>FIGAERO–CIMS measurement</title>
      <p id="d1e675">A Filter Inlet for
Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO) coupled to a time-of-flight
mass spectrometer (ToF-CIMS) was utilized to characterize the NAC content of
the gas and particle phases. This instrument is described in detail in
previous publications (Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2014; Le Breton et al.,
2018, 2019). Teflon tubing and copper tubing were used as
sample lines for the gas and particle phases, respectively. The ToF-CIMS was
operated in negative ionization mode with iodide (I–) as the reagent ion.
High-purity N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> air (99.9 % purity) was flown over a glass vial
containing methyl iodide (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>I) and into a TOFWERK type-P X-ray ion
source (operated at 9.5 kV and 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>A) to create ions to charge
compounds (MH) entering the ion–molecule region (IMR). The resulting product
ions were identified either as molecular adducts with iodide (MHI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) or
deprotonated ions (M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Eq. 1):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M43" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MHI</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e780">The ToF-CIMS was optimized to have an average spectral mass resolution
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 3000. ToF spectra showing ions with mass-to-charge (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
ratios between 7–620 Da were acquired with a time resolution of 1 s and
averaged over 1 min for data analysis The ToF spectra were mass
calibrated using four frequently occurring ion peaks: iodide monomer
(I<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 126.904 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), dimer (I<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 253.809 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and trimer
(I<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 380.713 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion (61.988 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
signal of the reagent ion (iodide, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">126.904</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) provided the information
on the drift of the signal of the mass spectrometer (MS). The variabilities
of the raw iodide signal during the field measurement were less than 10 % and
20 % for the gas- and particle-phase analysis, which indicated the minimal
drift of the CIMS signal. During the post-processing of the data, all
signals from MS were normalized to the signal of the reagent ion to account
for the daily variations/drifts. Gas-phase blank analysis was performed during the
post-campaign calibration of the instrument</p>
      <p id="d1e920">Aerosol particles were collected for 30 min with a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cyclone
and deposited on a Zefluor<sup>®</sup> PTFE membrane filter. Analytes
were then desorbed by passing heated N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas over the filter, with a
temperature cycle from room temperature to 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C over 20 min, followed by a 10 min soak at 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to ensure
desorption of the compounds from the filter (a typical desorption profile is
shown in the Supplement). The NACs were quantified by doping
the PTFE filter of the FIGAERO with known amounts of freshly prepared
authentic standards. The standards were analysed using the same thermal
desorption procedure as for the aerosol particles. NACs with no available
standard were quantified by applying sensitivities for compounds with
similar chemical structures.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Other collocated instruments</title>
      <p id="d1e970">A high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS) was
used to measure the composition and size distribution of particles with
diameters below 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). These measurements provided mass
concentrations of particle-bound non-refractory species such as organics,
sulfates, nitrates, ammonium, and chloride with a 4 min average time
resolution (DeCarlo et al., 2006). Volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), including some precursors of NACs, were monitored using a
combination of two online gas chromatographs (GCs) with a mass spectrometer
(MS) and flame ionization (FID) detectors, resulting in the detection of
over 100 VOCs. Photolysis rates of ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O1D)) and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
were measured using a commercial spectroradiometer, which was calibrated
using a high-power halogen lamp after the field campaign.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1392?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Box-model simulation of nitrocatechol using the AtChem tool</title>
      <?pagebreak page1393?><p id="d1e1029">A series of box-model simulations was conducted to clarify the mechanism of
NC formation during the second period of the experimental campaign (see
below), when secondary chemistry dominated the formation of NACs.
Simulations were performed using AtChem
(Sommariva et al., 2020; <uri>http://https://atchem.leeds.ac.uk/</uri>, last access: 27 January 2021), an online
zero-dimensional box model, together with chemical reactions extracted from
the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCMv3.3.1) via the website
(<uri>http://mcm.leeds.ac.uk/MCM</uri>, last access: 27 January 2021; Jenkin et al., 2003; Saunders et al., 2003).
AtChem was previously utilized to simulate the formation of formic acid and
nitrophenol at a site dominated by oil and gas production
(Yuan et al., 2016). In our simulations,
NC was used as a representative NAC to clarify the potential contribution of
compounds emitted during biomass burning (i.e. catechol) to secondary NAC
formation. The strong dependence of NC production on the overall rate of
secondary formation and its significant mixing ratio during the second
period (74 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) made this compound a suitable representative NAC for
this purpose. The MCM (v.3.3.1) assumes that NC is the sole product of
catechol, which greatly reduces the complexity of the model's calculations.
Measured concentrations of inorganic gases such as CO, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and selected volatile organic compounds were used to constrain the
simulations (Table S3). Over 90 VOCs were measured during the field campaign
in Dezhou. However, to minimize the computational cost of the modelling
process, only the 10 VOCs with the highest mixing ratios were included in
the model. Additionally, compounds with multiple isomers (e.g. xylene and
trimethylbenzene) were treated as single species to further reduce
computational cost. The VOCs with the highest contribution to OH reactivity
in four Chinese cities (Tan et al., 2019) were
also included in the model to properly simulate the major oxidation
reactions in the atmosphere. The VOC concentration assumed in the
simulations amounted to 75 % of the total VOC concentration measured in
Dezhou. Overall, a total of 1195 species (intermediates, products, etc.) and
3705 reactions (oxidation, photolysis, etc.) were included in the mechanism.
The contribution of traffic sources was also analysed; results for these
sources are presented in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Identification and occurrence of NACs in Dezhou</title>
      <p id="d1e1084">Figure 2 compares mass spectra collected during a strong BB episode (red
lines) to those for a typical clean day (black lines) in Dezhou. The
intensities of several molecular ion peaks increased significantly during
the BB episode, particularly those at 138.019 and 154.014 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
correspond to the deprotonated masses of NP (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and NC (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. These ions exhibited
6- to 8-fold increases in signal intensity during the BB episode,
clearly indicating substantial increases in the concentrations of the
corresponding compounds. By analysing the difference between polluted and
clear episodes, 16 ions related to nitro-aromatic compounds were identified
(see Fig. 2), including nitrobenzoic acid, methoxy/methyl NP, and DNP. The
exact positioning and assignment of the functional groups of the nitro-aromatic
compounds could not be determined because ToF-CIMS cannot differentiate
between isomers, i.e. compounds with the same molecular formulas. High-resolution fitting results for individual peaks are presented in the
Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e1160">The campaign-average mixing ratios of NACs measured for the gas and
particle phase were 1720 and 299 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The measured
fractions of the 16 NACs in the particle phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ranged between 9 %
and 28 %, with a mean of 16 %; these results are consistent with those
obtained in an earlier study that applied the same measurement technique
during springtime at a suburban site in Changping near Beijing, China
(Le Breton et al., 2018). The overall
contribution of particle-phase NACs to the total concentrations of organic
matter (mean: 1.9 %; range: 0.0025 %–21 %) and total PM (mean: 1.1 %;
range: 0.0013 %–11 %) varied substantially over the campaign, which may
indicate that multiple NAC sources and formation pathways influence the
concentration of NACs. Since the analytical technique used in this work
cannot account for all NACs, the mass loadings reported here should be
treated as lower limits. Nevertheless, the mean concentrations measured in
Dezhou were higher than the mixing ratios of total NACs reported in other
studies (Teich et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018, 2019; Kahnt et
al., 2013), possibly because this work examined a greater number of NACs (16 compounds). Furthermore, concentrations of NACs measured in winter are
normally significantly higher than those measured in the summer because the
boundary layer is usually more shallow, and BB (wood combustion) occurs more
frequently in winter.</p>
      <p id="d1e1186">The diurnal profile of total gas-phase NACs exhibits two distinct peaks: a
broad peak around midday, between 13:00–16:00, and another in the evening
(around 20:00 local time), as shown in Fig. 3. The mean daytime
concentration of gas-phase NACs in Dezhou (2200 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was almost
twice the night-time mixing ratio (1400 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), presumably because
either the rate of NAC production was higher during the daytime or the rate
of loss was lower. These results stand in contrast to those of an earlier
study, in which only night-time peaks were observed due to the daytime
photolysis of NACs (Yuan et al., 2016).
Mean daytime and night-time concentrations of particle-phase NACs were similar
(304 and 300 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) but with clear variability, as shown
in the corresponding diurnal profiles: there were two diurnal particle-phase
peaks (08:00 and 20:00 LT), but both were less pronounced than their gas-phase counterparts. These maxima coincided with the peaks in the diurnal
profiles of organic and particulate matter, suggesting that levels of
particle-phase NACs were linked to the general occurrence of ambient
aerosols. This may be due to enhanced partitioning towards the particle
phase caused by increases in the organic aerosol mass. The diurnal profile
of particle-phase NACs was comparable with the observed profile of
nitrocatechol detected from residential wood smoke (Gaston
et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e1225">Figure 3 also shows the mass contribution of lumped NAC categories in the
gas and particle phases. NACs were assigned to lumped categories based on
their structural similarity to the most common NACs reported in previous
studies. Both the gas and particle phases exhibited similar percentage
contributions for each category. NP and its analogues accounted for almost
half of the total NAC concentration in both phases, which was assumed to be
due to the strong influence of primary emission from BB events. NC and
methylnitrocatechol, both of which are commonly used as biomass tracers
(Iinuma et al., 2010; Finewax et al., 2018), individually accounted for as
much as 9 % of the total NAC<?pagebreak page1394?> concentration. Interestingly, the diurnal
profiles of NP did not follow the general trend of the other measured NACs.
This suggests that its formation pathway differs from that of other NACs
such as NC; it may be that the contribution of secondary formation is
greater than that of direct primary emission from BB for NP.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1231"><bold>(a)</bold> Integrated mass spectra during a biomass burning
episode (red) and a typical “clean” day. <bold>(b)</bold> Expansions of the
peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 138 and 154, which correspond to deprotonated nitrophenol (NP)
and nitrocatechol (NC). The increase in the strength of the NP and NC
signals during the biomass burning episode is readily apparent.
<bold>(c)</bold> Molecular structures of the 16 NACs identified in this
work, grouped according to structural similarity.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1389/2021/acp-21-1389-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Sources of nitro-aromatic compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e1268">Previous studies indicated that NACs mainly originate from BB, traffic, or
secondary formation in the gas or condensed phase, with minor contributions
from coal combustion (Hanson et al., 1983; Wang et al., 2018; Yuan et al.,
2016; Xie et al., 2019; Chow et al., 2016). While previous studies found that
traffic has important effects on NAC levels (Cecinato et al., 2005; Tremp
et al., 1993), its influence appeared to be limited in this case: there was
a weak to negative association between typical automobile exhaust VOCs
(benzene, toluene, and trimethylbenzene) (Zhang et al., 2018; Geng et al.,
2008; Batterman et al., 2002) and the studied NACs. Furthermore,
concentrations of the measured NACs did not peak during or shortly after
periods of high traffic intensity, in contrast to results obtained at three
sites in Europe during cold and warm seasons (Delhomme et al.,
2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e1271">NACs may also form in aqueous phases, particularly when the atmosphere has a
high liquid water content (Harrison et al., 2005b; Vidović et al.,
2018, 2020). The contribution of aqueous-phase oxidation
to NAC formation was found to be limited based on the negative relationship
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6) between the relative humidity (RH) and the mixing
ratios of NACs in the gas and particle phases. An earlier study found that
the relative contribution of aqueous-phase oxidation to NAC formation in
Beijing increased as the ambient RH increased
(Wang et al., 2019). The conditions in Dezhou
during the measurement campaign were relatively dry (the campaign average
RH was 50 %), with few days exceeding 70 % RH as shown in Fig. 1.</p>
      <p id="d1e1295">Given the minor contributions of traffic and aqueous-phase oxidation, most
of the subsequent analysis focused on primary BB emissions and secondary
formation in the gas and particle phases.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1301"><bold>(a, b)</bold> Diurnal profile of the sum of NACs in the gas <bold>(a)</bold> and particle <bold>(b)</bold> phases. The solid black line indicates the hourly average. Note that outliers are not shown in the figure. <bold>(c)</bold> Molecular distribution of NACs in the gas and particle phases, classified according to similarity to major NACs. Values in parentheses indicate the number of compounds per category.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1389/2021/acp-21-1389-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Primary emission from biomass burning</title>
      <p id="d1e1329">The measurement period included many intense BB episodes that increased the
concentrations of some NACs, particularly in the particle phase. To verify
the association between these elevated concentrations and the observed BB
episodes, the atmospheric behaviours of levoglucosan and nitrous acid (HONO)
and the ratio of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) were used as
tracers of BB. Levoglucosan is a commonly used molecular tracer of BB that
is superior to other markers such as K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and black carbon (BC) because
it is much less prone to interference from non-BB sources (Zhang et al.,
2012; Simoneit et al., 1999). Concentrations of HONO increase during BB
episodes because the rate of conversion of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into HONO is elevated in
BB plumes due to the presence of aerosols with high surface areas
(Nie et al., 2015). The ratio of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reflects the freshness of the emissions from
combustion; levels of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in plumes originating from local BB are high,
typically resulting in a ratio close to 1. The atmospheric transformation of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to the formation of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> components such as HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
organonitrates, causing the ratio of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to deviate from
unity. In Fig. 4, the 3-week measurement campaign is separated into
four periods corresponding to four distinct NAC formation regimes. Regimes 1
and 3 are associated with strong BB episodes based on the profiles of the
three previously mentioned tracers. Levels of NACs in the condensed phase
mirrored those of levoglucosan, which exhibited two strong peaks at 08:00 and
20:00 LT. Moreover, during apparent BB events, the timing of the peaks in
NAC concentrations agreed well with that of the peaks in the diurnal OM
profile. This demonstrates the apparently strong contribution of NACs to
submicron aerosols in the studied city in rural China</p>
      <p id="d1e1467">Figure 4 also shows the gas and particle concentration time series of three
representative NACs (NP, NC, and DNP). NP and NC are frequently reported to
be the dominant NACs in field- and laboratory-based BB studies (Xie et
al., 2019; Wang et al., 2017, 2018). Figure 4 clearly shows that
the three NACs behave in quite different ways under the regimes linked to
strong BB episodes. In these regimes, gas-phase NP concentrations correlated
strongly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with those in the particle phase. This may be
because there was a common dominant source of NP in the gas and particle
phases or because of fast partitioning of NP between these phases during BB
events. There was also good agreement between the gas- and particle-phase
time series for the methoxy/methyl (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and ethoxy/ethyl
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) derivatives of NP during BB regimes. NP and its
analogues thus appear to be good direct tracers of primary emissions from BB
events in Dezhou.</p>
      <p id="d1e1541">Conversely, the correlations between the gas- and particle-phase
concentrations of NC and DNP were very weak (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating
that BB events had different effects on the formation and partitioning of
these NACs (see Supplement for a complete correlation
analysis). During typical clean days, particularly from  20 to 30 December
(regime 2), the average correlation coefficient between the gas and particle
phases for all NACs fell to less than 0.5, possibly because the contribution
of photochemical processes to NAC formation was high relative to that of
primary BB sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e1560">Secondary NAC formation may also occur during periods of extensive BB,
resulting in mixed contributions to the observed NAC concentration.
Differences in the mixing ratios and mass concentrations of NACs between BB
regimes and relatively clean regimes can shed light on the relative
contributions of primary emissions from BB and secondary production during
each regime type. This can be demonstrated by considering the average NAC
concentrations under regimes 1 (a strong BB regime) and 2 (a non-BB regime);
pronounced differences (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) in NAC concentration between
these regimes can be considered indicative of the influence of BB on NAC
production in Dezhou. The average recorded signal intensities for
levoglucosan in the gas and particle phases under regime 2 were 52 % and
72 % lower, respectively, than those for regime 1. Moreover, some
compounds, particularly NP and its methoxy/methyl and ethoxy/ethyl
derivatives, exhibited significantly reduced mixing ratios in both gas and
particle phases under regime 2. This supports the position that these
compounds may be useful direct tracers of BB in Dezhou. Some NACs exhibited
lesser declines (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) in the gas-phase mixing ratio, suggesting
that BB may not be their dominant source;<?pagebreak page1396?> for example, they may be primarily
formed via secondary production. This behaviour was observed for dinitrated
aromatic compounds such as C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> which can be formed via nitration of
mononitrates (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Yuan et
al., 2016; Vione et al., 2005). Such nitration processes are mainly driven by
secondary photochemical or multiphase reactions, explaining the
comparatively small difference in the mixing ratios of these compounds
between regimes 1 and 2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1717"><bold>(a)</bold> Time series of particle-phase concentrations of
levoglucosan, gas-phase concentrations of HONO, and ratios of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as markers of BB episodes during field measurements.
<bold>(b, c, d)</bold> Mixing ratios of nitrophenol, nitrocatechol,
and dinitrophenol under regimes corresponding to BB episodes and non-BB
episodes. The coefficient of correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) reflects the agreement between
the gas- and particle-phase concentrations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1389/2021/acp-21-1389-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Secondary formation of gas-phase NACs</title>
      <p id="d1e1764">Under regime 2, concentrations of BB markers fell dramatically, indicating
that the influence of primary biomass emissions was limited (as shown in
Fig. 4). Here, the diurnal profiles of gas-phase NACs (as shown in Fig. 5) exhibit increases in concentration at 14:00–15:00 LT and a minor
night-time peak at 20:00 LT. Similarly, in contrast to the events during
regime 1, the peak in particle-phase NAC concentrations occurred also in the
afternoon at 14:00–15:00 LT. These peaks in the daily mixing ratios NACs
coincided with the daily peak ozone concentration. Secondary photochemical
formation was therefore probably the dominant NAC formation process under
regimes 2 and 4. This conclusion is supported by the fact that the
coefficient of determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between ozone and nitrophenol (see
Fig. 5) under regime 2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is substantially higher than that
for the full data set including BB regimes 1 and 3 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1). The most
pronounced reductions in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed for compounds expected to
originate mainly from primary sources (e.g. NP); for compounds expected to
be formed mainly via secondary production (e.g. NC and DNP), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with ozone remained relatively high throughout the campaign (see Fig. 5).</p>
      <p id="d1e1828">Secondary production of NACs can be linked to the presence of specific
precursor compounds (Harrison et al., 2005a). Figure 6 shows
the correlations between levels of NP, NC, and DNP and those of their
proposed precursors – phenol (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O), catechol/dihydroxybenzene
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and NP. Phenol and catechol are primarily formed by
the pyrolysis of lignins and can be precursors for secondary formation of
NACs, particularly during BB events (Yee et al., 2013; Finewax et al.,
2018; Gaston et al., 2016). Levels of NACs correlated strongly
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.8) with those of their primary precursors (i.e. phenol and
catechol). This indicates that nitration of these precursor phenolic
compounds in the presence of OH or NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals was an important
route of NP and NC formation. The figure showing the correlation between
precursors and final products also shows the observed ozone mixing ratio,
which is a measure of secondary<?pagebreak page1397?> photochemical activity. This further
underscores the significance of photochemical oxidation in the formation of
NC and NP from catechol and phenol. A similar relationship was observed for
the secondary formation of DNP via further oxidation of nitrophenol. DNP is
formed by the reaction of nitrophenol with OH or NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals to
form nitrophenoxy radicals (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), whose
subsequent nitration yields DNP (Yuan et
al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e1947">As shown in Fig. 4, the ratio of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is an
indicator of plume freshness, was lower under regime 2 than regime 1,
suggesting that an older plume was sampled in the former case. This aged
plume may have contained residual traces of regional photochemical smog
containing phenol, catechol, and their derivatives that were formed as
primary emissions during BB events outside the studied region.</p>
      <p id="d1e1968">The yield of NACs produced by secondary formation is known to depend on the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (Wang et al., 2018, 2019; Yuan et al., 2016). For instance, NP is formed by the nitration of phenoxy radicals
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which are themselves formed by the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-mediated oxidation of phenol (Berndt and
Böge, 2003). Mechanistically, the formation of NACs such as NP should be
heavily dependent on the atmospheric concentration of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However,
NACs such as NP and nitrosalicylic acid were formed consistently in a
mountainous region of China, even when the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was below 5 ppb (Wang et al., 2018). The campaign NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
average for this work in Dezhou was 23 ppb, with daytime and night-time means
of 17 and 26 ppb, respectively. These mixing ratios may have been high
enough to sustain the nitration of aromatic VOCs. However, a negative
correlation was observed between NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NACs in the gas (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.598</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and particle phases (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.116</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under regime 2,
when secondary formation was the dominant source of NACs. In aged air masses
such as those sampled during regime 2, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> will be transformed into
nitrated compounds (and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), which may explain this negative
correlation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2120"><bold>(a)</bold> Correlation between levels of
nitrophenol and ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(b)</bold> Normalized diurnal
profiles of gas-phase NACs and ozone under the second NAC formation regime observed during the field campaign. <bold>(c)</bold> Coefficients of
determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between gas-phase NACs and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the whole
data set and for regime 2 only.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1389/2021/acp-21-1389-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2168">3D scatter plots showing the variation of the
concentrations of NP, NC, and DNP with the concentrations of their precursors,
together with the corresponding ozone mixing ratios.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1389/2021/acp-21-1389-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2179">Schematic depiction of the atmospheric formation and loss of nitrocatechol in the gas phase based on the reaction pathways included in the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCMv3.3.1). Species names used in the MCM are given in parentheses.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1389/2021/acp-21-1389-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Analysis of NAC production and loss pathways</title>
      <?pagebreak page1399?><p id="d1e2197">To further investigate the secondary production of NAC during the
experimental campaign, box-model simulations were performed to model NC formation
and loss using the AtChem tool and atmospheric oxidation chemistry models
from MCMv3.3.1. Figure 7 shows the reaction pathway for the formation of NC
by catechol oxidation initiated by OH or NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals. Unlike in the
case of NP, only one precursor – catechol – can generate the intermediates
(i.e. CATEC1O, CATEC1O2, and CATEC1OOH) in NC formation. Sinks of NC are its
further oxidation by NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or OH radicals, which lead to stable
ring-opening products such as 2-oxoacetic acid. Photolysis and
deposition/dilution of NC were also accounted for in the simulation because
of their reported importance in the gas-phase atmospheric loss of formic
acid and NP (Yuan et al., 2015, 2016). The photolysis
frequency of NC used in the simulations was based on the reported value for
NP (1.4 % of the photolysis frequency of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). A sensitivity analysis
(see Supplement) of the box model against variation of the effective
physical loss rates (due to dispersion and deposition) indicated that a high
loss rate (1 h) provided the best estimate of the observed NC mixing
ratios. Physical loss terms with equivalent lifetimes above 1 h (e.g. 3 h) overestimated the measured NC concentrations by at least 50 %. As a
result, the tail of the modelled daytime peak extended well into the night
when using low physical loss rates. The loss rate used in this work was
higher than the rates used in previous box-model analyses of formic acid and NP
(Yuan et al., 2015, 2016) but is reasonable given the low
vapour pressure of NC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa) (Finewax et
al., 2018), which favours partitioning into the condensed phase.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2247">Modelled and observed nitrocatechol concentration time series. The inset shows the diurnal profile of the observed and modelled nitrocatechol concentrations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1389/2021/acp-21-1389-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2256">Figure 8 shows time series of the observed and modelled mixing ratios of
nitrocatechol under regime 2. The simulated mixing ratio profile agrees
reasonably well with the experimental data, as indicated by the mean ratio
of the modelled concentration to the observed concentration
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Model</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Obs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the coefficient of determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between the two data sets. These results clearly show the explicit
dependence of the secondary formation of NACs such as nitrocatechol on the
oxidation of thermal degradation and pyrolysis products of lignins (e.g. catechol) in aged plumes. The modelling procedure overestimated the observed
concentration from 27 to 31 December, which was attributed to the elevated mass
aerosol mass concentration and increased RH which would favour the
partitioning of the gas-phase NACs to the particle phase and a potential
loss by condensed-phase processes/deposition. Additionally, the presence of
the simulated daytime peak confirms that the rate of daytime production of
NC (source) exceeded its rate of photolysis (sink) during the second period
of the field campaign. If the daytime loss rate of NC due to photolysis is
disregarded, the mixing ratio will only increase by 10 %, clearly showing
the weak contribution of photolysis to the overall loss of NC. The primary
pathways of NC loss were thus oxidation by OH radicals and night-time
oxidation by NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals.</p>
      <p id="d1e2309">Figure 8 also shows the diurnal profiles of the modelled and observed NC
concentrations. The modelled profile features prominent peaks at 10:00
(shoulder), 16:00, and 20:00 local time, but the experimentally observed
afternoon peak in NC levels occurred around 14:00 LT. This discrepancy can
be explained by the change of wind direction from north-west to north-east
observed after 14:00 LT. It should be noted that the parametrization of
AtChem does not account for meteorological effects and that it only
partially accounts for dispersion via the effective physical loss rate
parameter. The three daily maxima were attributed to the contributions of
different sources of the intermediate hydroxyphenoxy radicals (CATEC1O)
throughout the day. As shown in Fig. 7, the nitration of CATEC1O radicals
is the only source of NC, so the production of hydroxyphenoxy radicals will
dictate the overall rate of NC formation under excess NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions.
Figure 9 shows the relative contributions of the three major CATEC1O
formation pathways. Note that CATEC1O can also be produced through
photolysis of hydroperoxylphenol (CATEC1OOH) and the reaction of
hydroxyphenylperoxy (CATEC1O2) with NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals, as shown
in Fig. 7. However, these pathways account for less than 0.05 % of the
total CATEC1O production and were therefore disregarded. The daytime
shoulder peak of NC at 10:00 was due to OH radical oxidation of catechol and
accordingly coincides with the diurnal peak in the OH concentration
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The major formation
pathways of OH radicals in Dezhou during wintertime were HONO photolysis and
the reaction of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with NO, causing measured OH production to peak in
the afternoon rather than at midday, as is more common. Ozone photolysis,
which is typically a major source of OH radicals, made a negligible
contribution under the studied wintertime conditions. The simulated diurnal
profiles of major oxidants are presented in the Supplement.
Additionally, the box model indicated that the high levels of CATEC1O at
13:00 were predominantly due to the reaction of NO with hydroxyphenylperoxy
radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %). Finally, the elevated levels of NC at
20:00 were primarily attributed to the very efficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 % conversion) NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> night-time chemistry after sunset (16:30).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2408">Diurnal variation in the relative contribution of the hydroxyphenoxy (CATEC1O) pathway to overall nitrocatechol formation. Also shown are the observed concentrations of nitrocatechol and the summed rates of CATEC1O production.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1389/2021/acp-21-1389-2021-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Classification and quantification of sources of nitro-aromatic compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e2425">The general sources of NACs have been explored in previous works (Wang et
al., 2017, 2019). The 16 NACs found in Dezhou were further
categorized based on their main formation routes: primary BB and secondary
formation. As noted above, secondary processes were dominant under regime 2,
whereas both routes contributed under regime 1. The NACs detected under
regime 1 were further classified based on the correlation between their gas-phase and condensed-phase concentrations. A strong correlation between the
gas and particle phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was taken to indicate either that<?pagebreak page1400?> primary
BB was the dominant source of the NAC in question or that it underwent rapid
partitioning between phases. Five NACs exhibited <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values above 0.75 and thus behaved like NP. The gas- and particle-phase concentrations
fell by at least 55 % and 85 % when the major source of NACs shifted
from primary BB under regime 1 to secondary formation under regime 2.
However, these five compounds were also formed under regime 2, suggesting
that secondary formation does contribute to their presence. To assess the
impact of each formation pathway under regime 1, two approaches were used.
In the first approach, it was assumed that the degree of secondary formation
was similar under regimes 1 and 2, which is reasonable based on the average
ozone levels under each regime (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb). Both regimes had
similar total gas and particle-phase concentrations of DNP, a product only
formed by secondary oxidation, further supporting the validity of this
assumption. This first approach was referred to as the DNP method based on
the similar DNP profiles observed under regimes 1 and 2. By subtracting the
concentrations of the five BB compounds under regime 2 from those under
regime 1, it was determined that primary BB combustion processes accounted
for 70 % of the observed concentrations of these compounds. The second
approach used to estimate the contribution of primary BB to the measured NAC
concentrations involved using levoglucosan as a primary source tracer. This
approach is analogous to the widely used EC (elemental carbon) tracer approach, in which EC is used to distinguish the primary organic carbon
(POC) fraction from secondary organic carbon (SOC) in total organic carbon
(OC) measurements (Day et al., 2015; Cabada et al., 2004). The high time
resolution levoglucosan (lev.) measurements were performed using the same
instrument and conditions as the NAC measurements, so they provided good
data coverage, making lev. a suitable tracer for primary BB. The relative
contributions of primary emission (BB) and secondary (sec) formation for
each NAC were estimated using the following expression:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M181" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NAC</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NAC</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lev</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lev</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NAC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sec</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NAC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NAC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Table}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2572">Classification of the detected nitro-aromatic compounds based on their major formation pathways.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NACs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (NAC–O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Total conc. (g <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> p)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Class</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col7" nameend="col8" align="center">Primary contribution </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col8" align="center">from BB in regime 1 (2) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Reg 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Reg 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">DNP. %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Lev.  %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">190</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">51.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">BB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">58 (46)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">118</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">BB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">60 (48)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">381</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">62.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">BB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">68 (40)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">558</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">121</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">BB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">67 (53)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NP)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">786</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">290</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">BB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">64 (76)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">S</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">43.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">S</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">49.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">S</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">83.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">49.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">S</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">S</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">53.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">S</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">180</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">85.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">S</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (DNP)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">137</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">148</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">S</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">253</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">101</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">UNC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">47.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">UNC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">66.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">59.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">UNC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2575"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the correlation coefficient between the gas and particle phases under regime 1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>√</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; X <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (NAC–O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the difference between the correlation of determination between NAC and ozone under regime 2 and that for the complete data set.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g is gas, and p is particle.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> BB is biomass burning, S is secondary formation, and UNC is unclassified.
DNP is the dinitrophenol method, and lev. is the levoglucosan tracer method. Values in parentheses are for regime 2.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3817">Here, ([NAC] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [lev.])<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio of the concentration of the NAC
to that of lev. during strong primary combustion emission, and NAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and NAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sec</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the fractions of NACs generated through biomass burning
and secondary production, respectively. NAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and lev. are the
measured concentrations of NACs and levoglucosan in ambient measurements,
respectively. Using this approach, primary BB combustion processes were
found to account for 60 % of the total production of BB-related compounds
under regime 1, in good agreement with the estimate obtained using the DNP
method.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1401?><p id="d1e3864">The secondary compounds were categorized as such based on the weak
correlations between their gas- and condensed-phase concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under regime 1 and their association with ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (NAC–O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)), which is indicative of formation via secondary
chemistry. For NACs mainly formed via secondary oxidation (e.g. nitrocatechol), the coefficient of determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between ozone and
NACs under regime 2 was similar to that for the full data set. This suggests
that the formation pathways of these compounds did not change over the
measurement period, regardless of the occurrence of combustion episodes.
Table 1 shows the classifications of 13 of the 16 NACs examined in this
work, including their total concentrations under regimes 1 and 2. The
classifications were further supported by the correlations between the
concentrations of the 16 NACs (Fig. 10), which clearly divide the NACs
into different groups based on their behaviour in the gas phase under regime 1. The data in Table 1 were used to estimate the relative contributions of
primary and secondary processes under the two regimes (Fig. 10), revealing
that the relative abundance of NACs associated with secondary formation
processes increased to 40 % in both the gas and particle phases under
regime 2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e3922"><bold>(a)</bold> Correlation matrix for gas-phase NACs under regime 1. <bold>(b)</bold> Relative contributions of the identified NAC classes under regimes 1 and 2.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1389/2021/acp-21-1389-2021-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusion and atmospheric implications</title>
      <p id="d1e3947">High concentrations of 16 NACs were observed during an aerosol measurement
campaign using a FIGAERO–ToF-CIMS at a rural site in China during wintertime
where biomass burning is predominant. The mean overall NAC concentration
during the measurement period was 2020 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with nitrophenol and its
analogues accounting for around half of this total. NACs accounted for 1.8 %
and 1.1 % of the total mass of airborne organic matter and total PM,
respectively. These results can be compared to measurements performed
downwind of London (Mohr et al., 2013), where<?pagebreak page1402?> the mean
ratio of the mass of NACs to that of OM (the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NACs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OM ratio) was
only about 0.5 %. The very high contribution of NACs in Dezhou can be
attributed to the extensive use of biofuels such as wood and straw for
cooking and heating among the rural population of China, particularly during
the cold season (Chen et al., 2017). Surveys of the studied
area during the field campaign accordingly revealed heavy use of wood fuels
when cooking, which coincided with strong peaks in the measured levels of
nitro-aromatic compounds and organic matter.</p>
      <p id="d1e3976">The measured levels of NACs in the gas and particle phases revealed that on
average, 16 % of the formed NACs were present in the particle phase
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The gas-phase levels of some NACs correlated strongly with their
particle-phase concentrations, suggesting rapid gas to particle partitioning
of primary emissions. Conversely, some typical secondary products exhibited
weaker correlations between the two phases, presumably due to the
contribution of strong gas-phase sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e3990">The measurement campaign was divided into four different periods associated
with different NAC formation regimes; in some periods, primary BB was the
dominant source of atmospheric NACs, while in other periods secondary
formation processes played a greater role. The contributions of other
sources such as traffic and aqueous-phase processes were found to be
negligible. The mixing ratios of NP and its derivatives increased markedly
under regimes coinciding with primary BB events, indicating that these
combustion processes contribute strongly to the formation of nitrophenolic
compounds. The concentrations of gas and particle-phase NACs decreased by 40 %
and 60 % on average (max: 80 % and 88 %) upon shifting from a regime dominated by primary emission to one dominated by secondary formation,
clearly indicating that the contributions of fresh biomass burning events to
NAC formation significantly outweigh those of secondary formation processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e3993">During periods with low concentrations of biomass burning indicators such as
levoglucosan, the diurnal profiles of gas-phase NACs clearly mirrored those
of the atmospheric ozone concentration. This was attributed to dominant NAC
formation via regional secondary chemistry (photochemical smog). Under these
conditions, the concentrations of precursors such as catechol and phenol
correlated strongly with those of the corresponding secondarily produced
NACs (e.g. NC and NP). Secondary formation was scrutinized using box-model
simulations of NC formation and loss to link the observed results to
specific chemical mechanisms. The three peaks in the experimentally observed
diurnal NC concentration profiles were attributed to variation in the
production of the hydroxyphenoxy radical intermediate over the course of the
day. The daytime increase in NAC levels observed in this work was higher
than in previous studies, possibly because of a high production rate
relative to the rate of primary loss via OH-mediated oxidation, which in
turn was considerably higher than the rate of loss via photolysis (which
accounted for only 10 % of the observed loss).</p>
      <p id="d1e3997">The individual NACs identified here were classified and quantified based on
the trends in their gas- and condensed-phase mixing ratios. Five of the 16 NACs, mainly the NP analogues, were classified as typical primary products of
BB, while 8 were classified as originating mainly from secondary production.
However, it was clear that secondary formation processes also contributed
appreciably to the observed concentrations of the five primary BB compounds.
These contributions were estimated using two approaches – the dinitrophenol
(DNP) and levoglucosan tracer methods. Both methods indicated that primary
combustion processes accounted for at least 60 % of the total production
of the five NACs classified as primary BB products during the regime dominated by primary BB. However, the contribution of secondary processes
was clearly significant, which may explain the high observed levels of other
secondary compounds. This suggests that photochemical smog plays a
significant role in NAC formation, even during wintertime air pollution
events in rural China that are dominated by primary emissions. This is
consistent with the evident contribution of secondary formation in high PM
episodes in North China, where oxidation of other oxidation anthropogenic
tracers, such as SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, plays an important role during severe haze
events (An et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e4009">Continuous and concurrent measurement of NACs in the gas and particle phases
with high time resolution has enabled us to understand the formation of
compounds that induce radiative forcing in the atmosphere by absorbing
near-UV and visible light. The finding that primary emission and secondary
formation were the dominant NAC-forming processes during the measurement
period highlights the dominant contribution of combustion of vegetation and
indoor fuels to the warming effect of brown carbon in the atmosphere.
Additionally, the NAC production and loss pathways identified in this work
provide insight into the climate impact of brown carbons, which partially
depends on the lifetime of their light-absorbing components (Hems
and Abbatt, 2018). Some oxygenated VOCs emitted during BB (e.g. catechol)
were shown to have extended atmospheric lifespans, allowing them to persist
beyond the combustion events in which they were formed and serve as
precursors for secondary formation of NACs, further exacerbating the warming
effects of BB episodes. In this work, NACs were found to comprise less than
2 % of the sampled aerosol by mass, so one might expect their overall
impact to be minimal. However, heavy pollution episodes
(PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mass</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) such as those caused by biomass
burning during wintertime may increase the formation of NACs that can induce
climate forcing and pose health hazards. There is thus a need for further
research on the mechanisms of oxidation of these anthropogenic aromatic
compounds under different scenarios, potentially building on the
classification and quantification<?pagebreak page1403?> of NACs presented in this work, to better
understand their global budgets and roles in climate forcing.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4051">The data used in this publication are available to the community, and they
can be accessed by request to the corresponding authors.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4054">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1389-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1389-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4063">MaH, MiH, and SG were the project leaders for this measurement campaign.
CMS, MLB, RT, and HW operated the CIMS. CMS, LL, MP, and ET performed the
calibration procedures and modelling/simulation experiments. WZ, LZ, and YY
supported with the analysis of other inorganic and organic pollutants. CMS
and MaH wrote the paper. All authors commented on the paper and were
involved in the scientific interpretation and discussion.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4069">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4075">This article is part of the special issue “Multiphase chemistry of secondary aerosol formation under severe haze”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4081">The work was done under the framework of the research programme “Photochemical
Smog in China”, financed by the Swedish Research Council (2013-6917). In
addition, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21677002, 41977179), the
National Key Research and Development Programme of China (2016YFC0202003), and the Swedish Research Council (2018-04430) are acknowledged for financial
support.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4086">This research has been supported by the Vetenskapsrådet (grant nos. 2018-04430 and 2013-06917), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41977179 and 21677002), and the National Key Research and Development Programme of China (grant no. 2016YFC0202003).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this open-access<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication were covered by the Gothenburg University Library.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4097">This paper was edited by Daniel Knopf and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: <uri>https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=878&amp;tid=172</uri> (last access: 27 January 2021), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>An, Z., Huang, R.-J., Zhang, R., Tie, X., Li, G., Cao, J., Zhou, W., Shi,
Z., Han, Y., Gu, Z., and Ji, Y.: Severe haze in northern China: A synergy of
anthropogenic emissions and atmospheric processes, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 8657–8666, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900125116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1900125116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Batterman, S. A., Peng, C. Y., and Braun, J.: Levels and composition of
volatile organic compounds on commuting routes in Detroit, Michigan,
Atmos. Environ., 36, 6015–6030, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00770-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00770-7</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berndt, T. and Böge, O.: Gas-phase reaction of OH radicals with phenol,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 5, 342–350, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B208187C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B208187C</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cabada, J. C., Pandis, S. N., Subramanian, R., Robinson, A. L., Polidori,
A., and Turpin, B.: Estimating the Secondary Organic Aerosol Contribution to
PM2.5 Using the EC Tracer Method Special Issue of Aerosol Science and
Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38, 140–155, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820390229084" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820390229084</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cecinato, A., Di Palo, V., Pomata, D., Tomasi Scianò, M. C., and
Possanzini, M.: Measurement of phase-distributed nitrophenols in Rome
ambient air, Chemosphere, 59, 679–683,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.045</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Li, C., Ristovski, Z., Milic, A., Gu, Y., Islam, M. S., Wang, S.,
Hao, J., Zhang, H., He, C., Guo, H., Fu, H., Miljevic, B., Morawska, L.,
Thai, P., Lam, Y. F., Pereira, G., Ding, A., Huang, X., and Dumka, U. C.: A
review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and
climate in China, Sci. Total Environ., 579, 1000–1034,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chow, K. S., Huang, X. H. H., and Yu, J. Z.: Quantification of nitroaromatic
compounds in atmospheric fine particulate matter in Hong Kong over 3 years:
field measurement evidence for secondary formation derived from biomass
burning emissions, Environ. Chem., 13, 665-673,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN15174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EN15174</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Day, M. C., Zhang, M., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of the ability of the
EC tracer method to estimate secondary organic carbon, Atmos.
Environ., 112, 317–325,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.044</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-Deployable, High-Resolution, Time-of-Flight
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac061249n</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Delhomme, O., Morville, S., and Millet, M.: Seasonal and diurnal variations
of atmospheric concentrations of phenols and nitrophenols measured in the
Strasbourg area, France, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 1, 16–22,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2010.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5094/APR.2010.003</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Desyaterik, Y., Sun, Y., Shen, X., Lee, T., Wang, X., Wang, T., and Collett
Jr., J. L.: Speciation of “brown” carbon in cloud water impacted by
agricultural biomass burning in eastern China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 7389–7399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50561</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Finewax, Z., de Gouw, J. A., and Ziemann, P. J.: Identification and
Quantification of 4-Nitrocatechol Formed from OH and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Radical-Initiated
Reactions of Catechol in Air in the Presence of NOx: Implications for
Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Biomass Burning, Environ.
Sci. Tech., 52, 1981–1989, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05864" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b05864</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gao, R., Jiang, W., Gao, W., and Sun, S.: Emission inventory of crop residue
open burning and its high-resolution spatial distribution in 2014 for
Shandong province, China, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 8, 545–554,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.009</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gaston, C. J., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Whybrew, L. E., Hadley, O., McNair,
F., Gao, H., Jaffe, D. A., and Thornton, J. A.: Online molecular
characterization of fine particulate matter in Port Angeles, WA: Evidence
for a major impact from residential wood smoke, Atmos. Environ., 138, 99–107,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.013</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Geng, F. H., Tie, X. X., Xu, J. M., Zhou, G. Q., Peng, L., Gao, W., Tang,
X., and Zhao, C. S.: Characterizations of ozone, NOx, and VOCs measured in
Shanghai, China, Atmos. Environ., 42, 6873–6883,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.045</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hallquist, M., Munthe, J., Hu, M., Wang, T., Chan, C. K., Gao, J., Boman,
J., Guo, S., Hallquist, A. M., Mellqvist, J., Moldanova, J., Pathak, R. K.,
Pettersson, J. B. C., Pleijel, H., Simpson, D., and Thynell, M.:
Photochemical smog in China: scientific challenges and implications for
air-quality policies, Natl. Sci. Rev., 3, 401–403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nww080" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nsr/nww080</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hanson, R. L., Henderson, T. R., Hobbs, C. H., Clark, C. R., Carpenter, R.
L., Dutcher, J. S., Harvey, T. M., and Hunt, D. F.: Detection of
nitroaromatic compounds on coal combustion particles, J. Tox. Env. Health, 11, 971–980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15287398309530400" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/15287398309530400</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harrison, M. A. J., Barra, S., Borghesi, D., Vione, D., Arsene, C., and
Iulian Olariu, R.: Nitrated phenols in the atmosphere: a review, Atmos.
Environ., 39, 231–248,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.044</ext-link>, 2005a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harrison, M. A. J., Heal, M. R., and Cape, J. N.: Evaluation of the pathways of tropospheric nitrophenol formation from benzene and phenol using a multiphase model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1679–1695, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1679-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1679-2005</ext-link>, 2005b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hems, R. F. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Aqueous Phase Photo-oxidation of Brown
Carbon Nitrophenols: Reaction Kinetics, Mechanism, and Evolution of Light
Absorption, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 225–234,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00123</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, D., Iinuma, Y., and Herrmann, H.: Development of a method for fast
analysis of phenolic molecular markers in biomass burning particles using
high performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical
ionisation mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, 1143, 168–175,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.035</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, R.-J., Wang, Y., Cao, J., Lin, C., Duan, J., Chen, Q., Li, Y., Gu, Y., Yan, J., Xu, W., Fröhlich, R., Canonaco, F., Bozzetti, C., Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J., Worsnop, D. R., El-Haddad, I., Prévôt, A. S. H., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Primary emissions versus secondary formation of fine particulate matter in the most polluted city (Shijiazhuang) in North China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2283–2298, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2283-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-2283-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Iinuma, Y., Böge, O., Gräfe, R., and Herrmann, H.:
Methyl-Nitrocatechols: Atmospheric Tracer Compounds for Biomass Burning
Secondary Organic Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Tech., 44, 8453–8459, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102938a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es102938a</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Inomata, S., Yamada, H., and Tanimoto, H.: Investigation on VOC Emissions
from Automobile Sources by Means of Online Mass Spectrometry, Current
Pollut. Rep., 2, 188–199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-016-0032-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40726-016-0032-6</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Saunders, S. M., Wagner, V., and Pilling, M. J.: Protocol for the development of the Master Chemical Mechanism, MCM v3 (Part B): tropospheric degradation of aromatic volatile organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 181–193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-181-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-181-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kahnt, A., Behrouzi, S., Vermeylen, R., Safi Shalamzari, M., Vercauteren,
J., Roekens, E., Claeys, M., and Maenhaut, W.: One-year study of
nitro-organic compounds and their relation to wood burning in PM10 aerosol
from a rural site in Belgium, Atmos. Environ., 81, 561–568,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.041</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kitanovski, Z., Grgić, I., Vermeylen, R., Claeys, M., and Maenhaut, W.:
Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for characterization
of monoaromatic nitro-compounds in atmospheric particulate matter, J. Chromatogr. A, 1268, 35–43,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.10.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chroma.2012.10.021</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kitanovski, Z., Grgić, I., Yasmeen, F., Claeys, M., and Čusak, A.:
Development of a liquid chromatographic method based on ultraviolet–visible
and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric detection for the
identification of nitrocatechols and related tracers in biomass burning
atmospheric organic aerosol, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 26,
793–804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6170" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.6170</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kroflič, A., Grilc, M., and Grgić, I.: Does toxicity of aromatic
pollutants increase under remote atmospheric conditions?, Sci.
Rep.-UK, 5, 8859, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08859" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep08859</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric
Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Le Breton, M., Wang, Y., Hallquist, Å. M., Pathak, R. K., Zheng, J., Yang, Y., Shang, D., Glasius, M., Bannan, T. J., Liu, Q., Chan, C. K., Percival, C. J., Zhu, W., Lou, S., Topping, D., Wang, Y., Yu, J., Lu, K., Guo, S., Hu, M., and Hallquist, M.: Online gas- and particle-phase measurements of organosulfates, organosulfonates and nitrooxy organosulfates in Beijing utilizing a FIGAERO ToF-CIMS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10355–10371, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10355-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-10355-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Le Breton, M., Psichoudaki, M., Hallquist, M., Watne, Å. K., Lutz, A.,
and Hallquist, Å. M.: Application of a FIGAERO ToF CIMS for on-line
characterization of real-world fresh and aged particle emissions from buses,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 244–259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1566592" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2019.1566592</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, B. H., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Mohr, C., Kurtén, T., Worsnop, D. R.,
and Thornton, J. A.: An Iodide-Adduct High-Resolution Time-of-Flight
Chemical-Ionization Mass Spectrometer: Application to Atmospheric Inorganic
and Organic Compounds, Environ. Sci. Tech., 48, 6309–6317,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es500362a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es500362a</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
and Laskin, A.: Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbo<?pagebreak page1405?>n in Biomass
Burning Aerosol Particles, Environ. Sci. Tech., 50,
11815–11824, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Bluvshtein, N., Rudich, Y., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and
Laskin, A.: Molecular Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Inferred from a
Nationwide Biomass Burning Event, Environ. Sci. Tech., 51,
11561–11570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02276</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Mohr, C., Ehn, M., Rubach, F., Kleist, E., Wildt, J., Mentel, Th. F., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Worsnop, D., and Thornton, J. A.: A novel method for online analysis of gas and particle composition: description and evaluation of a Filter Inlet for Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 983–1001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-983-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-983-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lüttke, J., Scheer, V., Levsen, K., Wünsch, G., Neil Cape, J.,
Hargreaves, K. J., Storeton-West, R. L., Acker, K., Wieprecht, W., and
Jones, B.: Occurrence and formation of nitrated phenols in and out of cloud,
Atmos. Environ., 31, 2637–2648,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00229-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00229-4</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Xu,
L., Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Williams, L. R., Franklin, J. P., Zahniser,
M. S., Worsnop, D. R., Knighton, W. B., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K. J.,
Dubey, M. K., Allan, J. D., and Thornton, J. A.: Contribution of Nitrated
Phenols to Wood Burning Brown Carbon Light Absorption in Detling, United
Kingdom during Winter Time, Environ. Sci. Tech., 47,
6316-6324, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400683v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es400683v</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nie, W., Ding, A. J., Xie, Y. N., Xu, Z., Mao, H., Kerminen, V.-M., Zheng, L. F., Qi, X. M., Huang, X., Yang, X.-Q., Sun, J. N., Herrmann, E., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Fu, C. B.: Influence of biomass burning plumes on HONO chemistry in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1147–1159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1147-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1147-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Perrone, M. G., Carbone, C., Faedo, D., Ferrero, L., Maggioni, A.,
Sangiorgi, G., and Bolzacchini, E.: Exhaust emissions of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons, n-alkanes and phenols from vehicles coming within different
European classes, Atmos. Enviro., 82, 391–400,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.040</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saunders, S. M., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Pilling, M. J.: Protocol for the development of the Master Chemical Mechanism, MCM v3 (Part A): tropospheric degradation of non-aromatic volatile organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 161–180, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-161-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-161-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Simoneit, B. R. T., Schauer, J. J., Nolte, C. G., Oros, D. R., Elias, V. O.,
Fraser, M. P., Rogge, W. F., and Cass, G. R.: Levoglucosan, a tracer for
cellulose in biomass burning and atmospheric particles, Atmos.
Environ., 33, 173–182,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00145-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00145-9</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sommariva, R., Cox, S., Martin, C., Borońska, K., Young, J., Jimack, P. K., Pilling, M. J., Matthaios, V. N., Nelson, B. S., Newland, M. J., Panagi, M., Bloss, W. J., Monks, P. S., and Rickard, A. R.: AtChem (version 1), an open-source box model for the Master Chemical Mechanism, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 169–183, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-169-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-169-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tan, Z., Lu, K., Jiang, M., Su, R., Wang, H., Lou, S., Fu, Q., Zhai, C., Tan, Q., Yue, D., Chen, D., Wang, Z., Xie, S., Zeng, L., and Zhang, Y.: Daytime atmospheric oxidation capacity in four Chinese megacities during the photochemically polluted season: a case study based on box model simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3493–3513, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3493-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-3493-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Teich, M., van Pinxteren, D., Wang, M., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., Müller, T., Močnik, G., and Herrmann, H.: Contributions of nitrated aromatic compounds to the light absorption of water-soluble and particulate brown carbon in different atmospheric environments in Germany and China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1653–1672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1653-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1653-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tremp, J., Mattrel, P., Fingler, S., and Giger, W.: Phenols and nitrophenols
as tropospheric pollutants: Emissions from automobile exhausts and phase
transfer in the atmosphere, Water Air Soil Pollut., 68, 113-123,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00479396" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00479396</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vidovic, K., Kroflic, A., Sala, M., and Grgic, I.: Aqueous-Phase Brown
Carbon Formation from Aromatic Precursors under Sunlight Conditions,
Atmosphere-Basel, 11, 15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020131" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos11020131</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vidović, K., Lašič Jurković, D., Šala, M., Kroflič,
A., and Grgić, I.: Nighttime Aqueous-Phase Formation of Nitrocatechols
in the Atmospheric Condensed Phase, Environ. Sci. Tech.,
52, 9722–9730, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01161" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b01161</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vione, D., Maurino, V., Minero, C., and Pelizzetti, E.: Aqueous Atmospheric
Chemistry: Formation of 2,4-Dinitrophenol upon Nitration of 2-Nitrophenol
and 4-Nitrophenol in Solution, Environ. Sci. Tech., 39,
7921–7931, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es050824m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es050824m</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, L., Wang, X., Gu, R., Wang, H., Yao, L., Wen, L., Zhu, F., Wang, W., Xue, L., Yang, L., Lu, K., Chen, J., Wang, T., Zhang, Y., and Wang, W.: Observations of fine particulate nitrated phenols in four sites in northern China: concentrations, source apportionment, and secondary formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4349–4359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4349-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-4349-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Gu, R., Wang, L., Xu, W., Zhang, Y., Chen, B., Li, W., Xue, L.,
Chen, J., and Wang, W.: Emissions of fine particulate nitrated phenols from
the burning of five common types of biomass, Environ. Pollut., 230,
405–412,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.072" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.072</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Hu, M., Wang, Y., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Li, X., Tang, R., Zhu, W., Du, Z., Wu, Y., Guo, S., Wu, Z., Lou, S., Hallquist, M., and Yu, J. Z.: The formation of nitro-aromatic compounds under high NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and anthropogenic VOC conditions in urban Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7649–7665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7649-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7649-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, M., Chen, X., Hays, M. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J., Kleindienst,
T. E., and Holder, A. L.: Light Absorption of Secondary Organic Aerosol:
Composition and Contribution of Nitroaromatic Compounds, Environ. Sci. Tech., 51, 11607–11616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03263" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b03263</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, M., Chen, X., Hays, M. D., and Holder, A. L.: Composition and light absorption of N-containing aromatic compounds in organic aerosols from laboratory biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2899–2915, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2899-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-2899-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yee, L. D., Kautzman, K. E., Loza, C. L., Schilling, K. A., Coggon, M. M., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, M. N., Chan, A. W. H., Hersey, S. P., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from biomass burning intermediates: phenol and methoxyphenols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8019–8043, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8019-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8019-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1406?><ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yuan, B., Veres, P. R., Warneke, C., Roberts, J. M., Gilman, J. B., Koss, A., Edwards, P. M., Graus, M., Kuster, W. C., Li, S.-M., Wild, R. J., Brown, S. S., Dubé, W. P., Lerner, B. M., Williams, E. J., Johnson, J. E., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Lefer, B., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Weber, R. J., Zamora, R., Ervens, B., Millet, D. B., Rappenglück, B., and de Gouw, J. A.: Investigation of secondary formation of formic acid: urban environment vs. oil and gas producing region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1975–1993, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1975-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1975-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yuan, B., Liggio, J., Wentzell, J., Li, S.-M., Stark, H., Roberts, J. M., Gilman, J., Lerner, B., Warneke, C., Li, R., Leithead, A., Osthoff, H. D., Wild, R., Brown, S. S., and de Gouw, J. A.: Secondary formation of nitrated phenols: insights from observations during the Uintah Basin Winter Ozone Study (UBWOS) 2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2139–2153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2139-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2139-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y.-N., Zhang, Z.-S., Chan, C.-Y., Engling, G., Sang, X.-F., Shi, S.,
and Wang, X.-M.: Levoglucosan and carbonaceous species in the background
aerosol of coastal southeast China: case study on transport of biomass
burning smoke from the Philippines, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 19, 244–255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0548-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-011-0548-7</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Forrister, H., Liu, J., Dibb, J., Anderson, B., Schwarz, J. P.,
Perring, A. E., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Wang, Y., Nenes, A., and
Weber, R. J.: Top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing affected by brown carbon
in the upper troposphere, Nat. Geosci., 10, 486–489, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2960" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2960</ext-link>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. L., Yang, W. Q., Simpson, I., Huang, X. Y., Yu, J. Z., Huang, Z.
H., Wang, Z. Y., Zhang, Z., Liu, D., Huang, Z. Z., Wang, Y. J., Pei, C. L.,
Shao, M., Blake, D. R., Zheng, J. Y., Huang, Z. J., and Wang, X. M.: Decadal
changes in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from on-road
vehicles with intensified automobile pollution control: Case study in a busy
urban tunnel in south China, Environ. Pollut., 233, 806–819,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.133" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.133</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Ambient nitro-aromatic compounds – biomass burning versus secondary formation in rural China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Nitro-aromatic compounds (NACs) were measured hourly at a rural site in
China during wintertime to monitor the changes due to local and regional
impacts of biomass burning (BB). Concurrent and continuous measurements of
the concentrations of 16 NACs in the gas and particle phases were performed
with a time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS) equipped
with a Filter Inlet for
Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO) unit using iodide as the
reagent ion. NACs accounted for <i>&lt;</i>2&thinsp;% of the mass concentration of
organic matter (OM) and total particulate matter (PM), but the total
particle mass concentrations of these compounds can reach as high as 1000&thinsp;ng&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup> (299&thinsp;ng&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup> avg), suggesting that they may contribute
significantly to the radiative forcing effects of atmospheric particles.
Levels of gas-phase NACs were highest during the daytime (15:00–16:00 local
time, LT), with a smaller night-time peak around 20:00&thinsp;LT. Box-model
simulations showed that this occurred because the rate of NAC production
from gas-phase sources exceeded the rate of loss, which occurred mainly via
the OH reaction and to a lesser degree via photolysis. Data gathered during
extended periods with high contributions from primary BB sources (resulting
in 40&thinsp;%–60&thinsp;% increases in NAC concentrations) were used to characterize
individual NACs with respect to gas–particle partitioning and the
contributions of regional secondary processes (i.e. photochemical smog). On
days without extensive BB, secondary formation was the dominant source of
NACs, and NAC levels correlated strongly with the ambient ozone
concentration. Analyses of individual NACs in the regionally aged plumes
sampled on these days allowed precursors such as phenol and catechol to be
linked to their NAC derivatives (i.e. nitrophenol and nitrocatechol).
Correlation analysis using the high time resolution data and box-model
simulation results constrained the relationships between these compounds and
demonstrated the contribution of secondary formation processes. Furthermore,
13 of 16 NACS were classified according to primary or secondary formation
process. Primary emission was the dominant source (accounting for 60&thinsp;%–70&thinsp;%
of the measured concentrations) of 5 of the 16 studied NACs, but secondary
formation was also a significant source. Photochemical smog thus has
important effects on brown carbon levels even during wintertime periods
dominated by primary air pollution in rural China.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: <a href="https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=878&amp;tid=172" target="_blank"/> (last access: 27 January 2021), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
An, Z., Huang, R.-J., Zhang, R., Tie, X., Li, G., Cao, J., Zhou, W., Shi,
Z., Han, Y., Gu, Z., and Ji, Y.: Severe haze in northern China: A synergy of
anthropogenic emissions and atmospheric processes, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 8657–8666, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900125116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900125116</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Batterman, S. A., Peng, C. Y., and Braun, J.: Levels and composition of
volatile organic compounds on commuting routes in Detroit, Michigan,
Atmos. Environ., 36, 6015–6030, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00770-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00770-7</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Berndt, T. and Böge, O.: Gas-phase reaction of OH radicals with phenol,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 5, 342–350, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B208187C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B208187C</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Cabada, J. C., Pandis, S. N., Subramanian, R., Robinson, A. L., Polidori,
A., and Turpin, B.: Estimating the Secondary Organic Aerosol Contribution to
PM2.5 Using the EC Tracer Method Special Issue of Aerosol Science and
Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38, 140–155, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820390229084" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820390229084</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cecinato, A., Di Palo, V., Pomata, D., Tomasi Scianò, M. C., and
Possanzini, M.: Measurement of phase-distributed nitrophenols in Rome
ambient air, Chemosphere, 59, 679–683,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.045</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, J., Li, C., Ristovski, Z., Milic, A., Gu, Y., Islam, M. S., Wang, S.,
Hao, J., Zhang, H., He, C., Guo, H., Fu, H., Miljevic, B., Morawska, L.,
Thai, P., Lam, Y. F., Pereira, G., Ding, A., Huang, X., and Dumka, U. C.: A
review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and
climate in China, Sci. Total Environ., 579, 1000–1034,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chow, K. S., Huang, X. H. H., and Yu, J. Z.: Quantification of nitroaromatic
compounds in atmospheric fine particulate matter in Hong Kong over 3 years:
field measurement evidence for secondary formation derived from biomass
burning emissions, Environ. Chem., 13, 665-673,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN15174" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/EN15174</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Day, M. C., Zhang, M., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of the ability of the
EC tracer method to estimate secondary organic carbon, Atmos.
Environ., 112, 317–325,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.044</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-Deployable, High-Resolution, Time-of-Flight
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Delhomme, O., Morville, S., and Millet, M.: Seasonal and diurnal variations
of atmospheric concentrations of phenols and nitrophenols measured in the
Strasbourg area, France, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 1, 16–22,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2010.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2010.003</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Desyaterik, Y., Sun, Y., Shen, X., Lee, T., Wang, X., Wang, T., and Collett
Jr., J. L.: Speciation of “brown” carbon in cloud water impacted by
agricultural biomass burning in eastern China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 7389–7399, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Finewax, Z., de Gouw, J. A., and Ziemann, P. J.: Identification and
Quantification of 4-Nitrocatechol Formed from OH and NO<sub>3</sub> Radical-Initiated
Reactions of Catechol in Air in the Presence of NOx: Implications for
Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Biomass Burning, Environ.
Sci. Tech., 52, 1981–1989, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05864" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05864</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, R., Jiang, W., Gao, W., and Sun, S.: Emission inventory of crop residue
open burning and its high-resolution spatial distribution in 2014 for
Shandong province, China, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 8, 545–554,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.009</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Gaston, C. J., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Whybrew, L. E., Hadley, O., McNair,
F., Gao, H., Jaffe, D. A., and Thornton, J. A.: Online molecular
characterization of fine particulate matter in Port Angeles, WA: Evidence
for a major impact from residential wood smoke, Atmos. Environ., 138, 99–107,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.013</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Geng, F. H., Tie, X. X., Xu, J. M., Zhou, G. Q., Peng, L., Gao, W., Tang,
X., and Zhao, C. S.: Characterizations of ozone, NOx, and VOCs measured in
Shanghai, China, Atmos. Environ., 42, 6873–6883,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.045</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hallquist, M., Munthe, J., Hu, M., Wang, T., Chan, C. K., Gao, J., Boman,
J., Guo, S., Hallquist, A. M., Mellqvist, J., Moldanova, J., Pathak, R. K.,
Pettersson, J. B. C., Pleijel, H., Simpson, D., and Thynell, M.:
Photochemical smog in China: scientific challenges and implications for
air-quality policies, Natl. Sci. Rev., 3, 401–403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nww080" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nww080</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hanson, R. L., Henderson, T. R., Hobbs, C. H., Clark, C. R., Carpenter, R.
L., Dutcher, J. S., Harvey, T. M., and Hunt, D. F.: Detection of
nitroaromatic compounds on coal combustion particles, J. Tox. Env. Health, 11, 971–980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15287398309530400" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/15287398309530400</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, M. A. J., Barra, S., Borghesi, D., Vione, D., Arsene, C., and
Iulian Olariu, R.: Nitrated phenols in the atmosphere: a review, Atmos.
Environ., 39, 231–248,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.044</a>, 2005a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, M. A. J., Heal, M. R., and Cape, J. N.: Evaluation of the pathways of tropospheric nitrophenol formation from benzene and phenol using a multiphase model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1679–1695, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1679-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1679-2005</a>, 2005b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hems, R. F. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Aqueous Phase Photo-oxidation of Brown
Carbon Nitrophenols: Reaction Kinetics, Mechanism, and Evolution of Light
Absorption, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 225–234,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00123</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, D., Iinuma, Y., and Herrmann, H.: Development of a method for fast
analysis of phenolic molecular markers in biomass burning particles using
high performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical
ionisation mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, 1143, 168–175,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.035</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, R.-J., Wang, Y., Cao, J., Lin, C., Duan, J., Chen, Q., Li, Y., Gu, Y., Yan, J., Xu, W., Fröhlich, R., Canonaco, F., Bozzetti, C., Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J., Worsnop, D. R., El-Haddad, I., Prévôt, A. S. H., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Primary emissions versus secondary formation of fine particulate matter in the most polluted city (Shijiazhuang) in North China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2283–2298, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2283-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2283-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Iinuma, Y., Böge, O., Gräfe, R., and Herrmann, H.:
Methyl-Nitrocatechols: Atmospheric Tracer Compounds for Biomass Burning
Secondary Organic Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Tech., 44, 8453–8459, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102938a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es102938a</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Inomata, S., Yamada, H., and Tanimoto, H.: Investigation on VOC Emissions
from Automobile Sources by Means of Online Mass Spectrometry, Current
Pollut. Rep., 2, 188–199, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-016-0032-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-016-0032-6</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Jenkin, M. E., Saunders, S. M., Wagner, V., and Pilling, M. J.: Protocol for the development of the Master Chemical Mechanism, MCM v3 (Part B): tropospheric degradation of aromatic volatile organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 181–193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-181-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-181-2003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Kahnt, A., Behrouzi, S., Vermeylen, R., Safi Shalamzari, M., Vercauteren,
J., Roekens, E., Claeys, M., and Maenhaut, W.: One-year study of
nitro-organic compounds and their relation to wood burning in PM10 aerosol
from a rural site in Belgium, Atmos. Environ., 81, 561–568,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.041</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Kitanovski, Z., Grgić, I., Vermeylen, R., Claeys, M., and Maenhaut, W.:
Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for characterization
of monoaromatic nitro-compounds in atmospheric particulate matter, J. Chromatogr. A, 1268, 35–43,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.10.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.10.021</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kitanovski, Z., Grgić, I., Yasmeen, F., Claeys, M., and Čusak, A.:
Development of a liquid chromatographic method based on ultraviolet–visible
and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric detection for the
identification of nitrocatechols and related tracers in biomass burning
atmospheric organic aerosol, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 26,
793–804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6170" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6170</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kroflič, A., Grilc, M., and Grgić, I.: Does toxicity of aromatic
pollutants increase under remote atmospheric conditions?, Sci.
Rep.-UK, 5, 8859, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08859" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08859</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric
Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Le Breton, M., Wang, Y., Hallquist, Å. M., Pathak, R. K., Zheng, J., Yang, Y., Shang, D., Glasius, M., Bannan, T. J., Liu, Q., Chan, C. K., Percival, C. J., Zhu, W., Lou, S., Topping, D., Wang, Y., Yu, J., Lu, K., Guo, S., Hu, M., and Hallquist, M.: Online gas- and particle-phase measurements of organosulfates, organosulfonates and nitrooxy organosulfates in Beijing utilizing a FIGAERO ToF-CIMS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10355–10371, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10355-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10355-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Le Breton, M., Psichoudaki, M., Hallquist, M., Watne, Å. K., Lutz, A.,
and Hallquist, Å. M.: Application of a FIGAERO ToF CIMS for on-line
characterization of real-world fresh and aged particle emissions from buses,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 244–259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1566592" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1566592</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, B. H., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Mohr, C., Kurtén, T., Worsnop, D. R.,
and Thornton, J. A.: An Iodide-Adduct High-Resolution Time-of-Flight
Chemical-Ionization Mass Spectrometer: Application to Atmospheric Inorganic
and Organic Compounds, Environ. Sci. Tech., 48, 6309–6317,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es500362a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es500362a</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
and Laskin, A.: Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbon in Biomass
Burning Aerosol Particles, Environ. Sci. Tech., 50,
11815–11824, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Bluvshtein, N., Rudich, Y., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and
Laskin, A.: Molecular Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Inferred from a
Nationwide Biomass Burning Event, Environ. Sci. Tech., 51,
11561–11570, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Mohr, C., Ehn, M., Rubach, F., Kleist, E., Wildt, J., Mentel, Th. F., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Worsnop, D., and Thornton, J. A.: A novel method for online analysis of gas and particle composition: description and evaluation of a Filter Inlet for Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 983–1001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-983-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-983-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lüttke, J., Scheer, V., Levsen, K., Wünsch, G., Neil Cape, J.,
Hargreaves, K. J., Storeton-West, R. L., Acker, K., Wieprecht, W., and
Jones, B.: Occurrence and formation of nitrated phenols in and out of cloud,
Atmos. Environ., 31, 2637–2648,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00229-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00229-4</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Xu,
L., Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Williams, L. R., Franklin, J. P., Zahniser,
M. S., Worsnop, D. R., Knighton, W. B., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K. J.,
Dubey, M. K., Allan, J. D., and Thornton, J. A.: Contribution of Nitrated
Phenols to Wood Burning Brown Carbon Light Absorption in Detling, United
Kingdom during Winter Time, Environ. Sci. Tech., 47,
6316-6324, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400683v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es400683v</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Nie, W., Ding, A. J., Xie, Y. N., Xu, Z., Mao, H., Kerminen, V.-M., Zheng, L. F., Qi, X. M., Huang, X., Yang, X.-Q., Sun, J. N., Herrmann, E., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Fu, C. B.: Influence of biomass burning plumes on HONO chemistry in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1147–1159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1147-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1147-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Perrone, M. G., Carbone, C., Faedo, D., Ferrero, L., Maggioni, A.,
Sangiorgi, G., and Bolzacchini, E.: Exhaust emissions of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons, n-alkanes and phenols from vehicles coming within different
European classes, Atmos. Enviro., 82, 391–400,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.040</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Saunders, S. M., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Pilling, M. J.: Protocol for the development of the Master Chemical Mechanism, MCM v3 (Part A): tropospheric degradation of non-aromatic volatile organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 161–180, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-161-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-161-2003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Simoneit, B. R. T., Schauer, J. J., Nolte, C. G., Oros, D. R., Elias, V. O.,
Fraser, M. P., Rogge, W. F., and Cass, G. R.: Levoglucosan, a tracer for
cellulose in biomass burning and atmospheric particles, Atmos.
Environ., 33, 173–182,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00145-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00145-9</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Sommariva, R., Cox, S., Martin, C., Borońska, K., Young, J., Jimack, P. K., Pilling, M. J., Matthaios, V. N., Nelson, B. S., Newland, M. J., Panagi, M., Bloss, W. J., Monks, P. S., and Rickard, A. R.: AtChem (version 1), an open-source box model for the Master Chemical Mechanism, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 169–183, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-169-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-169-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, Z., Lu, K., Jiang, M., Su, R., Wang, H., Lou, S., Fu, Q., Zhai, C., Tan, Q., Yue, D., Chen, D., Wang, Z., Xie, S., Zeng, L., and Zhang, Y.: Daytime atmospheric oxidation capacity in four Chinese megacities during the photochemically polluted season: a case study based on box model simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3493–3513, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3493-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3493-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Teich, M., van Pinxteren, D., Wang, M., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., Müller, T., Močnik, G., and Herrmann, H.: Contributions of nitrated aromatic compounds to the light absorption of water-soluble and particulate brown carbon in different atmospheric environments in Germany and China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1653–1672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1653-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1653-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Tremp, J., Mattrel, P., Fingler, S., and Giger, W.: Phenols and nitrophenols
as tropospheric pollutants: Emissions from automobile exhausts and phase
transfer in the atmosphere, Water Air Soil Pollut., 68, 113-123,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00479396" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00479396</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Vidovic, K., Kroflic, A., Sala, M., and Grgic, I.: Aqueous-Phase Brown
Carbon Formation from Aromatic Precursors under Sunlight Conditions,
Atmosphere-Basel, 11, 15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020131" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020131</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Vidović, K., Lašič Jurković, D., Šala, M., Kroflič,
A., and Grgić, I.: Nighttime Aqueous-Phase Formation of Nitrocatechols
in the Atmospheric Condensed Phase, Environ. Sci. Tech.,
52, 9722–9730, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01161" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01161</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Vione, D., Maurino, V., Minero, C., and Pelizzetti, E.: Aqueous Atmospheric
Chemistry: Formation of 2,4-Dinitrophenol upon Nitration of 2-Nitrophenol
and 4-Nitrophenol in Solution, Environ. Sci. Tech., 39,
7921–7931, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es050824m" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es050824m</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, L., Wang, X., Gu, R., Wang, H., Yao, L., Wen, L., Zhu, F., Wang, W., Xue, L., Yang, L., Lu, K., Chen, J., Wang, T., Zhang, Y., and Wang, W.: Observations of fine particulate nitrated phenols in four sites in northern China: concentrations, source apportionment, and secondary formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4349–4359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4349-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4349-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Gu, R., Wang, L., Xu, W., Zhang, Y., Chen, B., Li, W., Xue, L.,
Chen, J., and Wang, W.: Emissions of fine particulate nitrated phenols from
the burning of five common types of biomass, Environ. Pollut., 230,
405–412,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.072" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.072</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Hu, M., Wang, Y., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Li, X., Tang, R., Zhu, W., Du, Z., Wu, Y., Guo, S., Wu, Z., Lou, S., Hallquist, M., and Yu, J. Z.: The formation of nitro-aromatic compounds under high NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and anthropogenic VOC conditions in urban Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7649–7665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7649-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7649-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, M., Chen, X., Hays, M. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J., Kleindienst,
T. E., and Holder, A. L.: Light Absorption of Secondary Organic Aerosol:
Composition and Contribution of Nitroaromatic Compounds, Environ. Sci. Tech., 51, 11607–11616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03263" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03263</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, M., Chen, X., Hays, M. D., and Holder, A. L.: Composition and light absorption of N-containing aromatic compounds in organic aerosols from laboratory biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2899–2915, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2899-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2899-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Yee, L. D., Kautzman, K. E., Loza, C. L., Schilling, K. A., Coggon, M. M., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, M. N., Chan, A. W. H., Hersey, S. P., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from biomass burning intermediates: phenol and methoxyphenols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8019–8043, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8019-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8019-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, B., Veres, P. R., Warneke, C., Roberts, J. M., Gilman, J. B., Koss, A., Edwards, P. M., Graus, M., Kuster, W. C., Li, S.-M., Wild, R. J., Brown, S. S., Dubé, W. P., Lerner, B. M., Williams, E. J., Johnson, J. E., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Lefer, B., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Weber, R. J., Zamora, R., Ervens, B., Millet, D. B., Rappenglück, B., and de Gouw, J. A.: Investigation of secondary formation of formic acid: urban environment vs. oil and gas producing region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1975–1993, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1975-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1975-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, B., Liggio, J., Wentzell, J., Li, S.-M., Stark, H., Roberts, J. M., Gilman, J., Lerner, B., Warneke, C., Li, R., Leithead, A., Osthoff, H. D., Wild, R., Brown, S. S., and de Gouw, J. A.: Secondary formation of nitrated phenols: insights from observations during the Uintah Basin Winter Ozone Study (UBWOS) 2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2139–2153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2139-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2139-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y.-N., Zhang, Z.-S., Chan, C.-Y., Engling, G., Sang, X.-F., Shi, S.,
and Wang, X.-M.: Levoglucosan and carbonaceous species in the background
aerosol of coastal southeast China: case study on transport of biomass
burning smoke from the Philippines, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 19, 244–255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0548-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0548-7</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Forrister, H., Liu, J., Dibb, J., Anderson, B., Schwarz, J. P.,
Perring, A. E., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Wang, Y., Nenes, A., and
Weber, R. J.: Top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing affected by brown carbon
in the upper troposphere, Nat. Geosci., 10, 486–489, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2960" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2960</a>,
2017.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., Yang, W. Q., Simpson, I., Huang, X. Y., Yu, J. Z., Huang, Z.
H., Wang, Z. Y., Zhang, Z., Liu, D., Huang, Z. Z., Wang, Y. J., Pei, C. L.,
Shao, M., Blake, D. R., Zheng, J. Y., Huang, Z. J., and Wang, X. M.: Decadal
changes in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from on-road
vehicles with intensified automobile pollution control: Case study in a busy
urban tunnel in south China, Environ. Pollut., 233, 806–819,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.133" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.133</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
