<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-11689-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>In situ observation of new particle formation (NPF) in <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> the tropical tropopause layer of the 2017 Asian monsoon <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> anticyclone – Part 1: Summary of StratoClim results</article-title><alt-title>In situ observation of NPF in the tropical tropopause layer – Part 1</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{In situ observation of NPF in the tropical tropopause layer -- Part~1}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R.~Weigel et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Weigel</surname><given-names>Ralf</given-names></name>
          <email>weigelr@uni-mainz.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1316-0292</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff8">
          <name><surname>Mahnke</surname><given-names>Christoph</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2606-1680</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Baumgartner</surname><given-names>Manuel</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7307-7189</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Dragoneas</surname><given-names>Antonis</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Vogel</surname><given-names>Bärbel</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9763-3055</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Ploeger</surname><given-names>Felix</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Viciani</surname><given-names>Silvia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2260-094X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>D'Amato</surname><given-names>Francesco</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1349-6650</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Bucci</surname><given-names>Silvia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Legras</surname><given-names>Bernard</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3756-7794</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>Beiping</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Borrmann</surname><given-names>Stephan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-9380</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Abteilung Partikelchemie, Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute of Energy and Climate Research (IEK-7), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>National Institute of Optics, National Research Council (CNR-INO), Florence, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, UMR 8539, CNRS – École Normale Spérieure, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Université Pierre et Marie Curie, École Polytechnique, Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Institute of Energy and Climate Research (IEK-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Ralf Weigel (weigelr@uni-mainz.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>August</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>11689</fpage><lpage>11722</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>5</day><month>November</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>2</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Ralf Weigel et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e236">During the monsoon season of the year 2017 the airborne StratoClim mission took place in Kathmandu, Nepal, with eight mission flights of the M-55
<italic>Geophysica</italic> in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) of the Asian monsoon anticyclone (AMA) over northern India, Nepal, and
Bangladesh. More than 100 events of new particle formation (NPF) were observed. In total, more than 2 h of flight time was spent under
NPF conditions as indicated by the abundant presence of nucleation-mode aerosols, i.e. with particle diameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> smaller than
15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which were detected in situ by means of condensation nuclei counting techniques. Mixing ratios of nucleation-mode particles
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured at heights of 15–16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). NPF
was most frequently observed at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12–16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 355–380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and mainly below the tropopause. Resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained elevated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300–2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) up to altitudes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while under NPF conditions the fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of sub-micrometre-sized non-volatile residues (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) remained below 50 %. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12–14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 355–365 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) the minimum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 %) was found, and underneath, the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> generally remains below 25 %. The persistence of particles at nucleation-mode sizes is limited to a few hours, mainly due to coagulation, as demonstrated by a numerical simulation. The frequency of NPF events observed during StratoClim 2017 underlines the importance of the AMA as a source region for UTLS aerosols and for the formation and maintenance of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer (ATAL). The observed abundance of NPF-produced nucleation-mode particles within the AMA is not unambiguously attributable to (a) specific source regions in the boundary layer (according to backward trajectory analyses), or (b) the direct supply with precursor material by convective updraught (from correlations of NPF with carbon monoxide), or (c) the recent release of NPF-capable material from the convective outflow (according to air mass transport times in the tropical tropopause layer, TTL). Temperature anomalies with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (peak-to-peak amplitude), as observed at a horizontal wavelength of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70–100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during a level flight of several hours, match with NPF detections and represent an additional mechanism for local increases in supersaturation of the NPF precursors. Effective precursor supply and widely distributed temperature anomalies within the AMA can explain the higher frequency of intense NPF observed during<?pagebreak page11690?> StratoClim 2017 than all previous NPF detections with COPAS (COndensation PArticle counting
System) at TTL levels over Brazil, northern Australia, or West Africa.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e568">Aerosol particles in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) influence the radiative balance of the Earth's atmosphere, stratospheric
chemistry, and properties of cirrus clouds near the tropopause (Kremser et al., 2016). UTLS aerosols are mainly composed of sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and organic compounds. Additionally, the particles include fractions of non-volatile (or refractory) material (e.g. Froyd et al., 2010; Borrmann et al., 2010; Murphy et al., 2014; Schneider et al., 2021). Non-volatile components of stratospheric aerosol particles originate from (1) natural tropospheric sources, e.g. volcanoes, biomass burning, or pyro-cumulonimbus, or (2) from meteoric ablation, or (3) they are anthropogenic, as, for instance, space debris, rocket exhaust fumes, and products from combustion (Kremser et al., 2016). Chemical and microphysical processes, which involve the stratospheric aerosol, could be influenced by solutes that, for example, had previously been constituents of the refractory aerosol compounds. Soot, mineral dust, fly ashes, metal-containing condensates, inorganic salts, and other species probably make up the largest share of the non-volatile components of aerosol particles in the UTLS. In the tropics, underneath the tropopause, the number of non-volatile fine-mode particles (i.e. smaller than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and larger than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) typically exhibits a characteristic minimum, resulting in a fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % (and less) of non-volatile aerosol particles (cf. Borrmann et al., 2010; Weigel et al., 2011). Above the tropopause, at potential temperatures greater than 390–400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a maximum contribution of non-volatile aerosol constituents seldom exceeds 50 % (see e.g. Borrmann et al., 2010). Schneider et al. (2021) recently provided laser ablation mass spectrometric analyses of refractory particles in the LS region between the Equator and the Arctic, which indicate detectable signatures of meteoric ablation material at all sample locations in the LS. They assume that the meteoric ablation material is partly present as a solute or as insoluble inclusion within stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> droplets.</p>
      <p id="d1e685">In general, the typical particle size distribution of the stratospheric aerosol is characterised by processes such as formation of new particles and their coagulation, the condensation of saturated vapours, and the evaporation as well as removal when the largest particles sediment. In the tropics,
above the level of zero net radiative heating, where scavenging is lacking in the absence of clouds, aerosol particles are available for isentropic
dispersion or upward transport into the stratosphere. Sedimentation or isentropic transport and mixing remove particles from the stratosphere
(Thomason and Peter, 2006; Kremser et al., 2016). Moreover, the aerosol removal from the stratosphere occurs with particular efficiency via
large-scale air mass subsidence in the polar winter vortex in both the Arctic (Weigel et al., 2014) and the Antarctic (Campbell and Deshler, 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e688">The process of new particle formation (NPF) is considered to be one of the most important sources of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution
droplets prevailing in the UT and tropical tropopause layer (TTL) (Brock et al., 1995). The reservoir of stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
maintained by oxidation of gaseous precursors like sulfur dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), carbonyl sulfide (OCS), and carbon disulfide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or dimethyl sulfide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Thomason and Peter, 2006; Kremser et al., 2016). These species can originate from sea surface emissions, from volcanism, or from anthropogenic pollution, and they often undergo long-range transport before reaching the TTL (e.g. Law et al.,
2010). Sporadically, explosive volcanism injects large quantities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> directly into the stratosphere. Weaker volcanic eruptions (with a mean vertical explosion index of about 4) also contribute significantly by delivering volcanic sulfur species indirectly via the TTL into higher altitudes (Vernier et al., 2011b; Kremser et al., 2016). Although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is efficiently bound within clouds during convective uplift and dissolved in cloud hydrometeors, cloud-resolving model calculations suggest that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> proportions, which range from only 30 % (Ekman et al., 2006) up to 40 %–90 % (Barth et al., 2001), reach the outflow region of deep convection largely consistent with estimates by Crutzen and Lawrence (2000). Laboratory investigations by Jost et al. (2017) yielded a comparatively moderate retention coefficient (0.2–0.5) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ice phase of clouds compared to a retention of 100 % for hydrochloric acid (HCl) and for nitric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Jost et al., 2017). Hence, large fractions of the in-cloud dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leave the cloud ice composite as
soon as the cloud particles freeze or when riming occurs. Alternatively, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which remains in the cloud ice composite, is entirely
released when the ice particles sublimate in the convective outflow region or below, while the ice particles sediment. Rollins et al. (2017)
presented the results of in situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements at up to 19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude over the Gulf of Mexico and compared these with both
model results and satellite observations. Generally, at altitudes between 8 and 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the mean values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio vary
between 5 and 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Northern Hemisphere, between 8 and 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tropics, and between 5 and
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Southern Hemisphere (Kremser et al., 2016). Enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the vicinity of the tropopause
are often observed in connection with the uplift of polluted air masses by warm conveyor belts (WBCs) (Kremser et al., 2016). Apart from sulfuric acid, also other species contribute to particle nucleation and growth, such as organics (Metzger et al., 2010; Kerminen et al., 2010), amines (Kürten et al., 2018), or ammonia (e.g. Kirkby et al., 2011; Kürten, 2019). Given the quantity of organics (Murphy et al., 2006) and ammonia species (Höpfner et al., 2019) which were found in aerosol particles<?pagebreak page11691?> at UT and TTL heights in the AMA during the StratoClim 2017 mission, such compounds can act as agents promoting NPF in the UT and TTL region.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <label>1.1</label><title>New particle formation</title>
      <p id="d1e963">New particle formation (NPF) comprises (1) the initial combination of molecules into clusters (of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diameter) and (2) their
subsequent growth to larger diameters (Kulmala et al., 2013). Nucleation-mode aerosol particles with a diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of at least
3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> frequently form in considerable quantities from gaseous precursors. Once formed, the particles are subject to altering processes
(e.g. coagulation, growth by condensation of water vapour and other gases, evaporation, and scavenging). Within the entire atmosphere, NPF seems
ubiquitous as was demonstrated by various studies and observations of NPF's occurrence:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1002">at or close to the surface (Kulmala et al., 2004; Nieminen et al., 2018)</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1006">at elevated altitudes within the boundary layer (e.g. Bianchi et al., 2021; Sellegri et al., 2019; Wehner et al., 2015; Crumeyrolle et al.,
2010; Venzac et al., 2008)</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1010">in the boundary layer and in the free troposphere under the direct influence of volcanic activity (e.g. Sahyoun et al., 2019)</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1014">up to tropopause altitudes and the TTL region (Kerminen et al., 2018; Williamson et al., 2018, 2019).</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e1017">Modelling studies suggest that the NPF process constitutes one of the most important contributions (up to 45 %) to global mean tropospheric
concentrations of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activated at 0.2 % supersaturation (Merikanto et al., 2009). Uncertainties remain concerning the
effectiveness of NPF, which complicates the implementation of the NPF mechanism in global-scale simulations of aerosol number densities (Yu et al.,
2010; Zhang et al., 2010). Chamber experiments, conducted at temperatures similar to those prevailing in the UT, and also numerical simulations
confirm that the UT constitutes an important source region for atmospheric particles (Kürten et al., 2016; Dunne et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e1020">Based on airborne in situ observations of high particle number concentrations together with high levels of particle volatility in the cloud-free
tropical UT, the conditions of NPF occurrence were described for the first time by Brock et al. (1995). Between 7 and 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude, fields
of recent NPF events were encountered in about 20 % of the probed flight segments (Lee et al., 2004). High NPF productivity with the largest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed particularly at the bottom TTL, as shown by airborne measurements during missions over Brazil and over northern Australia
(Weigel et al., 2011). Recently, a survey of NPF occurrence in the free troposphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2–12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude) has suggested that the
NPF-produced particles persist (zonally almost invariant) as a globally extending band within the tropical UT, thereby covering 40 % of the
Earth's surface (Williamson et al., 2019). At altitudes between 12 and 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the tropics, this had also been reported by Borrmann
et al. (2010).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1068"><bold>(a)</bold> Flight patterns of the StratoClim 2017 mission over Nepal, India, Bangladesh, and the Bay of Bengal. <bold>(b)</bold> Regions with elevated number concentrations of nucleation-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ambient conditions) of sizes in the diameter range of 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from COPAS (COndensation PArticle counting
System) measurements are indicated by the colour code and by symbol size along the flight tracks.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1135">Between 27 July and 10 August 2017, during the Asian monsoon season, a total of eight scientific flights with the high-altitude research aircraft M-55
<italic>Geophysica</italic> over parts of the Indian subcontinent were performed from Kathmandu, Nepal (27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
85<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), during the StratoClim 2017 mission (see Fig. 1 and also Bucci et al., 2020). Some of these flights partly spanned out of Nepalese airspace to eastern India, Bangladesh, and the northern part of the Bay of Bengal. During StratoClim 2017, NPF was frequently observed in the presence of ice cloud particles within cirrus or in anvils of the convective outflow and is discussed in detail in the companion paper (Weigel et al., 2021). Based on these observations during StratoClim 2017, NPF turned out to be largely unaffected by faint ice clouds that typically occur in the TTL (Weigel et al., 2021). This study aims at discussing the NPF encounters in their entirety as observed during the<?pagebreak page11692?> StratoClim 2017 mission in the UT and TTL region at altitudes of up to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Asian monsoon anticyclone.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <label>1.2</label><title>The Asian monsoon anticyclone and the Asian tropopause aerosol layer</title>
      <p id="d1e1219">The Asian monsoon anticyclone (AMA) represents one of the most important circulation systems in the UTLS associated with deep convection over the
Indian subcontinent and beyond. From the beginning of June until about the end of August, the large-scale anticyclone persists at altitudes from the
UT to the LS regions (e.g. Randel and Park, 2006; Park et al., 2007), extending over longitudes from East Asia to the Middle East and East Africa
(e.g. Vogel et al., 2014, 2019). The anticyclonic rotation of the system induces confinement of air inside the AMA's interior (Ploeger et al.,
2015). Air masses in the region of the Asian monsoon are rapidly lifted by convection up to the maximum level of convective outflow
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 360 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) followed by a slow diabatic lift superimposed on the anticyclonic motion (e.g. Vogel
et al., 2019). Within the AMA, young air is transported to UTLS altitudes during boreal summer, and in this way various pollutants and other gaseous
material (Glatthor et al., 2015; Chirkov et al., 2016; Pan et al., 2016; Santee et al., 2017) and in particular water vapour (Ploeger et al., 2013)
are lifted into the UTLS region. Based on satellite studies, the existence of the aerosol layer at tropopause altitudes within the AMA region
(Asian tropopause aerosol layer, ATAL) was demonstrated (Vernier et al., 2011a; Thomason and Vernier, 2013). The existence of the ATAL was further
confirmed by in situ balloon-borne backscatter measurements between 2013 and 2017 at different locations near the AMA centre (Vernier et al.,
2015, 2018; Brunamonti et al., 2018; Hanumanthu et al., 2020) and recent aircraft measurements of Mahnke et al. (2021) or Fujiwara et al. (2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e1252">Hence, the constituents of the rising young air also include precursor material from anthropogenic (Vernier et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2015) and other
sources. The NPF process in the TTL region could contribute significantly to the formation and persistence of ATAL as a source of additional aerosol
material (He et al., 2019). Once the boundary layer material has reached UTLS levels within the AMA, the elevated tropopause potential temperature
during the monsoon season allows the material's isentropic dispersion into the “overworld” stratosphere (Pan et al., 2016). Three-dimensional
simulations with the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) and backward trajectory analyses show that by the end of August, during the
2008 monsoon season, air masses younger than 6 months reach the top of the AMA at about 460 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> potential temperature (corresponding to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). According to these simulations (Vogel et al., 2019), air masses are lifted due to diabatic (radiative) heating in an
anticyclonic large-scale upward spiral with ascent rates of about 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> potential temperature per day across the tropopause, consistent with the
conclusions of previous works (Bergman et al., 2012; Garny and Randel, 2016; Ploeger et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>In situ instrumentation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Total number concentration of sub-micrometre-sized particles</title>
      <p id="d1e1302">Particle number concentrations were measured in situ in 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution by means of a four-channel condensation nuclei (CN) counter COPAS
(COndensation PArticle counting System; see Weigel et al., 2009). For reduction in the statistical noise, the COPAS 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> raw data (direct signal of the scattered-light detectors) are preprocessed by applying a 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> running average. Three of the four COPAS channels operate with different 50 % detection particle diameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. 6, 10, and 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The fourth COPAS channel (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) detects particles downstream of a heated (270 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) sample flow line, resulting in measured
particle mixing ratios of non-volatile (nv) particle residues or refractory particles (e.g. soot, mineral dust, metallic particle material, etc.).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>COPAS operation during StratoClim 2017</title>
      <p id="d1e1401">The sampling is carried out via the forward-facing aerosol inlet of COPAS well outside the boundary layer of the aircraft. For stratospheric particle
concentrations, the COPAS measurement uncertainty in the StratoClim 2017 data discussed herein is about 15 %, which is due to particle counting
statistics and uncertainties in the volume flow. The measurement properties of COPAS are described in detail by Weigel et al. (2009), and its
performance has been demonstrated by several studies (Curtius et al., 2005; de Reus et al., 2009; Borrmann et al., 2010; Frey et al., 2011; Weigel
et al., 2011, 2014).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1407">Pressure-dependent corrections <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for number concentrations of nucleation-mode particles due to particle losses (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the aerosol line configuration (both COPAS instruments attached to a single aerosol inlet) as deployed during StratoClim 2017 by using the particle loss calculator (von der Weiden et al., 2009) modified for low-pressure applications; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), corresponding to Weigel et al. (2009).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="13">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="12mm" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="justify" colwidth="10mm" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="justify" colwidth="19mm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{12mm}?><oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Pressure,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> hPa</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col11" align="center" colsep="1">Particle diameter, nm </oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{15mm}?><oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col12" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> %</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{19mm}?><oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col13" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> (dimensionless)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">14</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">15</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col12" align="center">Particle-size-dependent transmission efficiency, % </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">80</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">70</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">74</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">77</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">79</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">81</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">82.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">84</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">85</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><?xmltex \hack{\hfill}?>24.25</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><?xmltex \hack{\hfill}?>1.32</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">150</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">70</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">77.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">81</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">83</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">84.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">86.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">87.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">88.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">89</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><?xmltex \hack{\hfill}?>17.75</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><?xmltex \hack{\hfill}?>1.22</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">300</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">77.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">81.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">84</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">86.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">88</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">89.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">90.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">91.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">92</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">92.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><?xmltex \hack{\hfill}?>12.65</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><?xmltex \hack{\hfill}?>1.14</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">400</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">83</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">85</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">87.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">89</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">90.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">91.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">92</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">92.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">93.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><?xmltex \hack{\hfill}?>11.52</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><?xmltex \hack{\hfill}?>1.13</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1802">For StratoClim 2017, a new inlet configuration was used, allowing both COPAS instruments to sample through a single aerosol inlet, resulting in an
almost doubled flow velocity through the sample tubes and reduced diffusional particle loss. This set-up required the reanalysis of the corrections to
account for particle loss (Table 1) using the method introduced by von der Weiden et al. (2009) with modifications for low-pressure application. One
of the four COPAS channels detects particle number densities of non-volatile particle residues downstream of a heated stainless steel tube (at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 270 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Appendix A).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>NPF identification: definitions and notations</title>
      <p id="d1e1832">The particle densities are typically measured by COPAS in particle number concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; ambient conditions) but are also
presented here as mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in units of particles per milligram of air (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for consistent comparisons of measurements from
different pressure levels<?pagebreak page11693?> and for correlations with the mixing ratios of gaseous tracers. Hereafter, the notation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the mixing ratio
of sub-micrometre-sized particles with diameters greater than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The measurement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (of particles with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) allows for the identification of recent NPF. The notation
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the mixing ratio of non-volatile particles (Appendix A) with corresponding size range as specified for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
proportion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of non-volatile particles is given as the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> in per cent.</p>
      <p id="d1e2025">Elevated number concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of nucleation-mode particles (defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) serve as an indication of recent NPF
when additionally the NPF criterion (Eq. 1) is met:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M138" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2100">This criterion was reassessed for the StratoClim 2017 data set based on the definition used by Weigel et al. (2011) to account for the COPAS
detectors' signal-to-noise ratio and the counting statistics. The NPF criterion therefore sets a conservative threshold (Weigel et al., 2011) that additionally accounts for the full range of data scattering (i.e. 20 % over periods of invariable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) that exceeds the 15 % uncertainty in the concentrations measured with COPAS. The strict criterion suppresses artificial features that mainly result from the scattering of the measured concentrations, and the criterion constrains the data set to the most significant of those that were interpreted as NPF events. Calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are then corrected concerning particles' diffusional loss inside the aerosol lines as described in Sect. 2.2 (see also Table 1). The calculated number concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are corrected by multiplying the factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1), which is a function of the static pressure during the measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e2153">Provided that the NPF criterion is met, a series of measurement points is denoted as an NPF event if the measured number concentration (or mixing ratio)
of nucleation-mode particles remains continuously greater than zero for at least 5 s of measurement. In total, 25 cases out of 130 individual
events had a duration of less than 5 s; therefore for these 25 cases the number of newly formed particles and the feature duration are
uncertain. Mainly those features that are much too short (e.g. lasting only 1 s) are filtered out by applying the NPF event definition. Based
on the mean airspeed and maximum ascent and descent rates of the M-55 <italic>Geophysica</italic> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 154 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, up to
10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), this definition implies that a feature of elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lasting over 5 s extends over a horizontal distance
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 770 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (at constant course) or vertically up to 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2243">The period of flight time during which the event criterion (Eq. 1) is met is referred to as the NPF event duration. From this information, the mean
airspeed is used to infer the horizontal extent of NPF fields – with caveats. Such estimates are limited by the assumption that an encounter of
elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (over tens of seconds and minutes) is actually due to a single NPF event and does not consist of a series of possibly
overlapping events. In addition, the determined horizontal distances refer to an average flight speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 154 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
the flight attitude is assumed to be unchanged during the event duration.</p>
      <p id="d1e2288">NPF events are distinguished by the peak number density of detected nucleation-mode particles and are denoted as
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2293"><italic>intense</italic> (often used synonymously with <italic>most recent</italic> NPF) if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeds 10 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2326"><italic>intermediate</italic> for NPF with 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2384"><italic>weak</italic> NPF when detected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained below 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e2414">This classification refers to laboratory studies by Kirkby et al. (2011) and Kürten et al. (2016), according to which the NPF rate and the NPF
intensity (i.e. its new particle productivity) vary with the degree of supersaturation of the vapour from which the new particles form. Due to the
short persistence of the freshly formed particles in the nucleation mode (see Sect. 4.5), an intense NPF event is still proceeding when observed, or it had phased out very recently (within hours) before the detection. For encounters of weak or intermediate NPF the conclusions concerning the event's age remain ambiguous.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page11694?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Particle size distributions from the ultra-high-sensitivity aerosol spectrometer UHSAS-A</title>
      <p id="d1e2427">The measurements of the aerosol particle size distributions during StratoClim 2017 were performed with an in-house-modified airborne version of the
ultra-high-sensitivity aerosol spectrometer (UHSAS-A; DMT Inc., Longmont, CO, USA). The modifications on the flow and pumping system of the UHSAS-A enabled the maintenance of constant system flows (sample, sheath, purge flow) through the instrument even under ambient pressures as low as 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Details concerning the modified airflow system of the UHSAS-A, the characterisation of the instrument's particle sizing performance, and its calibration during the campaign period are provided by Mahnke et al. (2021). The uncertainty in the number concentration measured by the UHSAS-A with 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution was determined to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % for the particle diameter range of 65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on laboratory characterisations of the sample flow measurement and of the counting efficiency of the instrument (Mahnke et al., 2021). Due to the unknown in-line temperature of the sample and the wide ambient temperature range throughout StratoClim 2017, a maximum uncertainty in the UHSAS-A measurements is estimated at 25 %. Some of the results from the measured particle size distributions and a comparison with other instruments and the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) are presented by Mahnke et al. (2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Carbon monoxide (CO) measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e2503">During the StratoClim 2017 mission, CO mixing ratios were determined by means of the tunable diode laser (TDL) detection principle, which the Carbon Oxide Laser Detector-2 (COLD-2) spectrometer is based on. According to comprehensive comparisons to the previous instrument version COLD (Cryogenically Operated Laser Diode; 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temporal resolution; Viciani et al., 2008), the new system implies several improvements (Viciani et al., 2018). The measurement's temporal resolution is improved by a factor of 4, the in-flight sensitivity of the COLD-2 spectrometer is about 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at integration times of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and an accuracy of 3 % is specified for the CO measurement with COLD-2
(Viciani et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Meteorological measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e2548">Atmospheric temperature and pressure data were taken from the Unit for Connection with the Scientific Equipment (UCSE; Sokolov and Lepuchov, 1998),
which is a part of the avionic system of the M-55 <italic>Geophysica</italic>. UCSE data are available as 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolved ambient pressure (accuracy:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accuracy). Based on these UCSE data, the potential temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> along the mission
flight tracks is calculated in compliance with the definition by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO, 1966). For the given vertical
temperature gradients and for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range over which the StratoClim 2017 flights extended (i.e. up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 477 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the WMO-recommended calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> differs at the most by up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the values obtained when using the recently reappraised
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> calculation (Baumgartner et al., 2020).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Analytical methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>The height of the lapse-rate tropopause and the equivalent latitude</title>
      <p id="d1e2668">Meteorological data were also taken from ERA-Interim reanalyses by the European Centre of Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) (Dee et al.,
2011). Hybrid reanalysis levels in the TTL are located at various pressure heights (i.e. around 177, 154, 133, 113, 96, 80, 67, and 55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively) representing a vertical resolution of about 1 km in this region.</p>
      <p id="d1e2679">The aircraft data are analysed in coordinates relative to the tropopause height and to the monsoon anticyclone centre, respectively. The height of the
lapse-rate-based thermal tropopause was determined based on ERA-Interim data and following the WMO criterion (WMO, 1957). The potential
temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at tropopause level was interpolated to the 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolved position along the flight track of the M-55
<italic>Geophysica</italic>, and the measurement data were sorted as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> distance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the local tropopause as a vertical
coordinate.</p>
      <p id="d1e2717">The centre of the AMA was determined based on the anomalous potential vorticity distribution within the monsoon region at the 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> potential
temperature level, where lowest values of the potential vorticity (PV) are found in the AMA centre. The AMA-centred equivalent latitude was calculated
for a given closed PV contour as a projection onto polar coordinates (Ploeger et al., 2015). An equivalent latitude of 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N corresponds
to the centre of the anticyclone (lowest PV), and the equivalent latitude decreases with increasing distance from the centre, or rather, towards the
anticyclone's edge. Note that the calculation of AMA-centred equivalent latitude is valid within a layer of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> around
380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> potential temperature, where a clear negative PV anomaly occurs. The uncertainties in calculated equivalent latitude become significant
at levels beyond the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range above or below 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>The coagulation model for investigating the particles' persistence in the nucleation mode</title>
      <p id="d1e2792">The model employed in this study numerically solves the discretised coagulation equation (e.g. Jacobson, 2005, and Eq. 15.2 therein) as
formulated in the numerical chemistry–climate model SOCOL (SOlar Climate Ozone Links; Stenke<?pagebreak page11695?> et al., 2013). For the coagulation of nucleation-mode
aerosol particles the Brownian coagulation kernel (Jacobson, 2005, Eq. 15.33 therein) is used. The particles are assumed to be spherical, and the model
is based on a discretisation of the volume space, wherein the ratio of two subsequent volume size bins is constant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
particle size range of the first volume size bin <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to particle diameters of 7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. With a total number of 40 size bins, the largest particle size included in this
investigation is about 635 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2931">The coagulation rate and thus the persistence of the nucleation-mode particles were simulated under given background conditions during
observation. As input for the simulation, the aerosol size distribution detected by the UHSAS-A (nominally covering
65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Sect. 2.2 and Mahnke et al., 2021) was extended towards smaller diameters by further particle size bins obtained from the measurements with COPAS. For the simulation presented herein, the NPF event on 4 August 2017 (KTM 5) over 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 04:04:40 and 04:05:06 UTC (pressure altitude: 110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; ambient air temperature: 196 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was selected. Each of the two size intervals of the COPAS measurements in the nucleation mode, i.e. 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is divided into three subintervals to adapt to the higher particle size resolution of the
coagulation model. The three sub-bins within the size classes 6–10 and 10–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were uniformly set to one-third of the respective
concentration<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The difference between the total number concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (COPAS) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (UHSAS-A) yields the
number concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The number concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was interpolated over 13 sub-bins (with
exponential degradation on increasing particles size) such that the size distribution exhibits a continuous transition towards the detection size
range of the UHSAS-A. The size-segregated aerosol concentrations measured with the UHSAS-A were interpolated (with respect to particle size) to the
resolution of the remaining 21 sub-bins of the coagulation simulation. The particle concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the entire particle size
range from the nucleation-mode sizes up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were converted into an aerosol size distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a representation of an initial state and input for the coagulation simulation (for more details see the results in Sect. 4.5).</p>
      <p id="d1e3279">It is worth noting that for the coagulation simulation, the NPF event is considered to be expired; i.e. any fresh supply of nucleation-mode particles
due to continuous or renascent NPF is excluded for the simulated runtime of the coagulation process over 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Generally, constant conditions
of atmospheric pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are assumed over the 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> period for the simulation as the air is lifted very slowly at
TTL levels within the AMA (by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> potential temperature per day, corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1–1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Vogel et al. 2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Analyses of trajectories and the air mass transport history</title>
      <p id="d1e3396">Backward trajectories of 50 d were calculated for each sampling position along <italic>Geophysica</italic>'s flight track in 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution
during the StratoClim 2017 mission using the trajectory module of the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS; McKenna et al., 2002;
Konopka et al., 2012; Pommrich et al., 2014) driven by horizontal winds from ERA5 reanalysis (Hersbach and Dee, 2016). With the vertical resolution
of the ERA5 data, a much better representation of convective updraught and tropical cyclones is realised (Hoffmann et al., 2019) compared to earlier
reanalyses (Dee et al., 2011), in particular in the region of the Asian summer monsoon (Li et al., 2020). Further detailed validation of the very
new ERA5 products is required, so ERA interim reanalyses still represent the state of the art until ERA5 becomes the new standard.</p>
      <p id="d1e3410">For vertical air mass transport velocities, the diabatic approach was applied using the total diabatic heating rate to extract the vertical velocity,
thereby including the release of latent heat (for details, see Ploeger et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e3413">The CLaMS backward trajectory calculations, which were initialised from each sampling position along the flight track in 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution, were
used to allocate the air's latest contact with the model boundary layer at 2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the ground. This allows for the investigation of the location of sources which influence the mixing ratios in the air samples taken aboard the M-55 <italic>Geophysica</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>The age of air since release from convective outflow</title>
      <p id="d1e3443">The history of a convective air mass is analysed by making use of the TRACZILLA Lagrangian model (Pisso and Legras, 2008), which is a variation in
FLEXPART (Stohl et al., 2005). The simulations were based on the release of a cluster of 1000 back trajectories, representative of a generic aerosol
tracer, each launched from a 1 s resolved time step along the flight path. The trajectories were traced back over a period of 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the geographical domain (between 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and 160<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and between the Equator and 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, respectively). The meteorological
fields (horizontal winds and radiative heating rates) are taken from ERA5 reanalyses. The convective influence is then distinguished from
uninfluenced cases by high-frequency images (one image per 10–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of cloud top altitudes from the geostationary satellites MSG1 and
Himawari (for details see Bucci et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e3489">Investigations by Weigelt et al. (2009) previously approached the influence of convective cloud processes on the number concentrations of aerosols and
in particular of nucleation-mode particles in the upper troposphere. In the present study, the convective sources were identified as such if the course of
a TRACZILLA-modelled trajectory within a certain geographical area is found below the cloud top level, as similarly done by Tzella and Legras (2011)
and<?pagebreak page11696?> Tissier and Legras (2016). It is noteworthy that, while the adopted trajectory method bypasses the uncertainties related to the convective
representation in the reanalysis by using observation-based information on the convective events, uncertainties still remain. Those arise mainly from
uncertainties in the identification of the cloud top from image data of geostationary satellites, the impossibility of accounting for the
entrainment–detrainment-processes, and reanalysis-related uncertainties concerning advection (for more details see Bucci et al., 2020). In the
presented analysis, the air mass age is computed as the difference between the time of release of the cluster and the convective cloud crossing. Since
the trajectory cluster can spread in space and bring different contributions from different regions, only the mean age from the dominant convective
source (i.e. the mean age from the regions with the highest percentage of convective cloud crossings) is considered in this analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Observations and results</title>
      <p id="d1e3501">Figure 1 shows the flight tracks of the eight mission flights conducted during StratoClim 2017. The vertical indices (visible in Fig. 1b) highlight the flight sections where significantly increased mixing ratios of nucleation-mode particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were encountered, which are attributable to NPF. NPF of varying intensity occurred near or above the southern flank of the Himalayas (features over Nepal and towards north-eastern India) and at a distance of more than 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> away from the mountains (near the coastline of Bangladesh or the north-eastern Indian coast towards the Sea of Bengal). Of the entire COPAS measurement time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), at altitudes above 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> potential temperature) about one-third (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the air samples were taken north of 26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, i.e. mainly in the immediate vicinity of the Himalayas, over Nepal, and neighbouring areas of north-eastern India. Hence, over the period of the StratoClim field mission during the 2017 monsoon season, the main transport of NPF precursor material into the UTLS was by convection above the foothills of the Himalayas. The present study aims at a classification of encountered NPF events with regard to
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3581">the height intervals and geographical positions of NPF observations</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3585">the time limits (event duration and time of occurrence)</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3589">spatial dependencies with regard to tropopause height and AMA geometry</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3593">the relationship between NPF and the air's origin and age.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e3596">It is noteworthy that, during StratoClim 2017, NPF was frequently observed in the presence of ice cloud particles at the bottom TTL of the AMA. The
conditions under which in-cloud NPF occurred during StratoClim are discussed in Weigel et al. (2021). Since the NPF turned out to be almost undisturbed by the presence of cloud elements (until a certain number density and size of the ice particles are reached), for the present study the NPF encounters remain undifferentiated concerning clear-air or in-cloud conditions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3601">Synopsis of vertical profiles of the total number concentration (median with 10th, 25th, 75th, 90th, and 99th percentiles) of sub-micrometre-sized particles as a function of potential temperature obtained from condensation nuclei (CN) detections over <bold>(a)</bold> Brazil (TROCCINOX, 2005), over <bold>(b)</bold> West Africa (SCOUT-AMMA, 2006), and over <bold>(c)</bold> the Indian subcontinent (StratoClim 2017). During TROCCINOX <bold>(a)</bold> and SCOUT-AMMA <bold>(b)</bold> the number concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at lower heights (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were measured aboard the DLR Falcon 20 (cf. Borrmann et al., 2010, and Weigel et al., 2011). All high-altitude measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the M-55 <italic>Geophysica</italic> and the entire StratoClim 2017 data set result from COPAS measurements. <bold>(c)</bold> The median profile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from repeated measurements (over the years 2004–2007) with the NMASS multi-channel CN counter over Central America (aboard the NASA WB-57F; data courtesy of J. C. Wilson, Denver University, 2011). All number concentrations are given at ambient conditions.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Vertical distribution of particle number concentrations with respect to observations in different tropical regions</title>
      <p id="d1e3707">Vertical profiles of the total particle number concentration obtained from various field campaigns in the tropics are shown as medians with percentiles
in Fig. 2. The vertical CN profiles from tropical regions of South America and West Africa (TROCCINOX, 2005; SCOUT-AMMA, 2006; Fig. 2a and b) exhibit merged data of two independent CN detectors with individual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which were deployed on
individual aircraft, the M-55 <italic>Geophysica</italic> and the DLR Falcon 20 Borrmann et al., 2010; Weigel et al., 2011). The dark shaded areas of the vertical profiles illustrate the scatter of number concentrations between the 90th and 99th percentiles. At tropopause altitudes around 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (indicated by vertical bars), or rather at the bottom TTL, the variability in detected concentration reaches a maximum between the 90th and 99th percentile. The increased data scatter indicates the influence of NPF on the class of sub-micrometre-sized particles at these TTL levels, resulting in increased and fluctuating particle number concentrations due to the variable production rate of particles by NPF
(see Sect. 2.2.1). Exclusively above the tropopause within the AMA (Fig. 2c), the scatter of the concentration values of sub-micrometre-sized particles remains elevated up to heights of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> potential temperature. Up to this point within the AMA, the scatter of the peak number concentrations (90th to 99th percentile range) is significantly increased in reference to the median values, while in other regions above the tropopause (Fig. 2a and b) the profiles of aerosol concentrations show a smoother transition into the stratosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e3818">For comparison (Fig. 2d), particle number concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are compiled as a vertical median profile (with percentiles) obtained from airborne measurements with the nuclei-mode aerosol spectrometer (NMASS; Brock et al., 2000) during several years (2004–2007, including winter and summer season) over Central America. These observations differentiate the bottom TTL (here 350–379 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as the region where NPF predominantly occurs with the largest impact on the fine-mode (sub-micrometre-sized) aerosol particle concentration (e.g. Borrmann et al., 2010; Weigel et al., 2011). However, this vertical profile (Fig. 2d) illustrates additional features at altitudes above the mean tropopause altitude (assumedly located at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The locally increased concentrations with respect to the median become apparent at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 380–390 and at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400–410 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Above tropopause levels, significantly increased number<?pagebreak page11697?> concentrations of fine-mode particles, potentially caused by local NPF, were observed over both Central America (Fig. 2d) and the Indian subcontinent within the AMA (Fig. 2c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3880"><bold>(a)</bold> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolved particle mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (grey shaded COPAS data points) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> median profile from StratoClim 2017 together with COPAS data from other tropical regions (over Brazil – TROCCINOX, 2005 – and over West Africa – SCOUT-AMMA, 2006; cf. Borrmann et al., 2010). The median profile of measurements in the tropics over the Americas (Brock et al., 1995) is coloured in green. <bold>(b)</bold> The vertical distribution of the mixing ratio of nucleation-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in compliance with the NPF criterion (see Sect. 2.2.1). <bold>(c)</bold> The 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolved mixing ratio of non-volatile particles (i.e. thermostable at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 270 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from COPAS measurements throughout StratoClim 2017 with corresponding median profile, including 25th and 75th percentile. Herein, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> median profile is implied from <bold>(a)</bold> for comparison. <bold>(d)</bold> The fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of non-volatile particles with median and with 25th and 75th percentiles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Mixing ratio of sub-micrometre particles, abundance, and fraction of refractory particles from StratoClim 2017 observations</title>
      <p id="d1e4059">The entire StratoClim 2017 data set of measured (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolved) particle mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is summarised in Fig. 3a as
a function of potential temperature. The resulting median profile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the StratoClim 2017 measurements is shown with the 25th and 75th percentile (blue profile). This allows for a direct comparison with the corresponding median profiles from earlier COPAS measurements at tropical regions (in red: TROCCINOX, Brazil, 2005; in dark green: SCOUT-AMMA, West Africa, 2006; cf. Borrmann et al., 2010 and Weigel et al., 2011). Figure 3a also includes the median vertical profile of the mixing ratios of fine-mode particles (bright-green line), which was obtained from measurements over the central Pacific, at tropical latitudes (Brock et al., 1995).</p>
      <p id="d1e4103">The profiles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 3a and b) are structured as
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4143"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350–380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – characterised by the largest scatter of the particle mixing ratios and the highest values of up to
5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, thus representing the height level of the profile's maximum;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4191"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 380–415 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – where the scatter of the particle mixing ratios is still increased though less prominent;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4209">above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 415 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – characterised by a comparatively weak but extant scatter level of particle mixing ratios, which also includes
features of the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile at 410–415 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the AMA.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <?pagebreak page11698?><p id="d1e4246">The course of the median profiles exhibits similar characteristics. The common feature of all median profiles from the tropics is their maximum at
about 350–360 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the AMA observations indicate a corresponding maximum at slightly higher altitudes (i.e. 355–365 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Further
aloft, the particle mixing ratios obtained from different locations decrease with altitude on a similar gradient. In the altitude range between 360 and
400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the tropical data obtained over South America (red) constitute the lowest particle mixing ratios (by median values), whereas all other
profiles are almost in line with each other up to 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The vertical median profile of particle mixing ratios determined in the AMA (blue)
during StratoClim 2017 exhibits the highest mixing ratios at each height level up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 415 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Additionally, the AMA profile features a
substantial increase in the median mixing ratio at altitudes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 410–415 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the values exceed those from the tropical regions by
about 35 %. Above 415 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the continuation of the tropical profiles from West Africa and Central America (coloured green) with altitude is
largely consistent with the particle mixing ratios measured throughout StratoClim 2017, while at these altitudes the measurements from South America
(red) show comparatively increased values. Above 440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the particle mixing ratio over West Africa (dark green) significantly deviates from
those of all other vertical profiles, as is visible from the gradual increase in the particle mixing ratio with altitude. This deviation was attributed
to the influence of the high-reaching volcanic injections of the Soufrière Hills (Borrmann et al., 2010). The 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolved StratoClim 2017 data
(grey dots in Fig. 3a) are added to the graph to illustrate how the scatter of measured particle mixing ratios relates to corresponding median
profiles.</p>
      <p id="d1e4336">Figure 3b shows the vertical distribution of the mixing ratio of the nucleation-mode particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Sect. 2.2.1). The flight-by-flight colouration of the data points indicates that increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were observed during each of the eight StratoClim 2017 mission flights. In addition, Fig. 3b shows the wide range of altitudes over which the layers of increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed during the individual flights. Remarkably increased values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were detected up to altitudes as high as 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page11699?><p id="d1e4392">Figure 3c depicts the 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolved mixing ratios of the non-volatile particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Appendix A) as well as the resulting median profile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the 25th and 75th percentiles. Figure 3c additionally shows the median profile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as in Fig. 3a, which illustrates the vertical progression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in direct relationship to the NPF-influenced total particle mixing ratio. Figure 3d illustrates the vertical distribution of the fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of non-volatile particles, i.e. the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Sect. 2.1.2), which is presented in 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution, as well as the profiles of resulting median with the 25th and 75th percentiles. At lower
altitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the mixing ratio of non-volatile particles appears low with a relatively large scatter. The local minima of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile and of the fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coincide with the local maximum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 355–375 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Above 370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile follows the general decline with height. Above 390 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, both mixing ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
decrease uniformly, and the fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> remains almost constant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45 %–50 % up to altitudes of 430 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Towards 435 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the total mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nearly stagnates, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits slightly dropping mixing ratios.</p>
      <p id="d1e4661">In essence, the vertical profiles of the total particle mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and those of the non-volatile particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are divided
into three ranges:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>A.</label>
      <p id="d1e4690">At the bottom TTL region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 375 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are mainly characterised by NPF, as indicated by the high mixing ratios of nucleation-mode particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. NPF causes a significant addition to the scatter of the total mixing ratios towards high values, which exceed the median by more than 1 order of magnitude. In this altitude range, a local deficit of the non-volatile particle compounds favours the occurrence of NPF.</p></list-item><list-item><label>B.</label>
      <p id="d1e4752">Further above, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 375 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 415 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, continued albeit attenuated NPF is identified at tropopause
levels within the AMA. The non-volatile-particle compounds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) slightly decrease compared to levels below 375 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, however, rises towards 40 %. Nevertheless, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 400–2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at heights of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
indicate sustainably effective NPF.</p></list-item><list-item><label>C.</label>
      <p id="d1e4870">Above 415 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the values of the total mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approach previous observations (e.g. Brock et al., 1995). The scatter of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is considerably decreased at these altitudes. NPF appears to have entirely abated since at these heights sufficiently
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were not observed at all. The median proportion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of non-volatile particles remains at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %–50 % up to the
highest altitude.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e4942">The steeply dropping vertical profile of the total mixing ratio of the sub-micrometre-sized aerosols above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 415 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> subtly indicates the upper limit of the AMA's influence on the vertical mixing of the UTLS. From the CO, ozone, and nitrous oxide content in air samples taken throughout
StratoClim 2017, von Hobe et al. (2021) concluded that the AMA's interior was largely isolated from stratospheric in-mixing up to altitudes of 10 to
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the tropopause (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Moreover, they found that mixing processes with stratospheric air are of
increasing significance at levels between 400 and 420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (von Hobe et al., 2021). At altitudes above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the median mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibit a vertically stable continuation after another sharp drop between 435 and 440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3a and b). Brunamonti et al. (2018) specified the 440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level as the top of confinement (TOC) of the AMA for the 2017 monsoon season. So, according to this TOC definition, above 440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> potential temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">≳</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 18.5–19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3a and b) represents stratospheric background values.</p>
      <p id="d1e5083"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The ATAL (Vernier et al., 2011a; and see also Höpfner et al., 2019; Mahnke et al., 2021) is mainly attributed to the uplift of pollution from the
boundary layer as concluded from balloon-borne and satellite-based observations (Vernier et al., 2018). The described drop in the aerosol
concentration (Vernier et al., 2018) at potential temperatures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (well above tropopause levels) coincides with the uppermost altitude limit of main NPF activity at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) observed during StratoClim 2017 (see Fig. 3). Here, the most substantial decrease in both mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and n<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>nv was observed in transit from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 410 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 415 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e5193">Frequency of the duration of observed NPF events during the StratoClim 2017 mission <bold>(a)</bold> as the frequency distribution of the NPF duration and <bold>(b)</bold> as a vertical profile as a function of mean potential temperature and coloured with reference to the mean mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of the nucleation-mode particles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Occurrence frequency of NPF events</title>
      <p id="d1e5230">Figure 4 shows the 130 individual NPF events sorted according to their duration. Based on the average flight speed (Sect. 2.2.1) and assuming a constant heading during flight, the mean horizontal distance per 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flight time spans about 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The spatially most extended uninterrupted NPF signature throughout StratoClim 2017 spanned a mean horizontal distance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The hitherto most extended NPF event observed with COPAS at TTL level over South America (Weigel et al., 2011) lasted over a continuous duration of 262 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of covered flight distance). Another three individual NPF events were observed above West Africa (Weigel et al., 2011) over 20, 83, and 98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. Approximately 45 % of 130 NPF events observed throughout StratoClim 2017 were of less than 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> duration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while the majority (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 %) of NPF observations above the Indian subcontinent extended over less than 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 4a). The vertical profile (Fig. 4b) shows that above 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, predominantly short events of less than 2 min duration with comparatively low mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were encountered. Here, observed NPF events rarely lasted for several minutes (i.e. 5–6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In the lower TTL range, i.e. below the tropopause, the number of persistent NPF events was higher than above the tropopause, and the mixing ratio of nucleation-mode particles was also more often increased. The highest mixing ratios of nucleation-mode particles were measured in events lasting from 1 min to a few (up to about 7) minutes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e5409"><bold>(a)</bold> Diurnal variation in the occurrence frequency of NPF events. <bold>(b)</bold> The diurnal distribution of NPF events' mean particle mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> with standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, coloured by flight date, and <bold>(c)</bold> in colours of the (logarithmic) duration of the respective event. Note that the mean horizontal distance is derived from the event duration based on a mean flight speed of 154 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; variable flight attitude remains unconsidered) and is understood as equivalent horizontal extension of an NPF event.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page11700?><p id="d1e5503">Figure 5 depicts the diurnal distribution of observed NPF events. The frequency of NPF event observations is analysed as a function of the local
daytime (LT) at Kathmandu, Nepal (Fig. 5a). Apart from one exception, the occurrence frequency of the NPF events seems evenly distributed over the
course of a day. The exception is a time window between 10:00 and 10:30 (LT), when recent particle formation was observed up to 2.5 times more
often than at other times of the day. In this time window, about one-third of all NPF events (31 of 105 events with durations of more than
5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were observed, most of which (25 of 31 events) lasted for less than 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mean horizontal distance). The measurements in this time window occurred at two distinct altitude layers, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 360–370 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 390–400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The majority of the StratoClim NPF events in this period (20 of 31 events) were from altitudes above 390 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while ascertained mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> were never outside <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500–5000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during this time of day. Throughout the StratoClim 2017 mission, no further NPF event was observed above 390 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at any earlier time of day, and only two single events were encountered at these heights during different flights at a later time of day
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12:20 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17:30 LT, respectively). Determining whether this pronounced frequency of NPF occurrence at a particular time of day is due to bias effects would require a larger database. Beyond this, preferred times of day when NPF was observed with particular frequency were not identified in the StratoClim observations, while instead, within the same region, a diurnal dependence of NPF was previously concluded based on a larger data set
(Hermann et al., 2003). The diurnal dependence of NPF would be expected if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed to be the main nucleating compound whose
production maximum (from the reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the local noon time correlates with the solar zenith (cf. Weigel et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e5670">Throughout StratoClim 2017, NPF was predominantly observed before local noontime during the mission flights KTM 2, KTM 3, KTM 5, and KTM 7, while all
other observations were made mainly during the afternoon. All NPF events which lasted longer than 5 s were almost evenly distributed over the day. Furthermore, Fig. 5c indicates that the longest NPF events are not generally associated with the highest mean mixing ratios
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. The duration of an event is therefore primarily an indicator of the spatial extent of a region where NPF takes place. The
derivation of the spatial extent from the duration of individual events, however, bears significant uncertainties since changes in flight attitude,
such as curve manoeuvres or changing flight levels during an event, are not taken into account.</p>
      <p id="d1e5687">The NPF events observed during StratoClim 2017 are among the most frequent and spatially most extended of all those which have been identified by
means of COPAS measurements during previous missions (cf. Borrmann et al., 2010; Weigel et al., 2011). Only a few events which lasted more than 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed during StratoClim 2017, but it cannot be excluded that they were actually composed of individual events of smaller extent. Very short events (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) make up almost 40 % of all NPF events observed. Consequently, hereafter, all events shorter than 5 s (i.e. 25 out of 130 events) are discarded from further analyses. In this way, individual 1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> features are filtered from the data. In addition, for the evaluation of individual NPF events, the reliability of the results increases if the arithmetic averaging occurs over more than five data points. Finally, the accuracy of the specified event duration improves as the raw signal processing (Sect. 2.1.3) smooths the temporal salience of short events.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5723">Mean particle mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of individual NPF events as a function of <bold>(a, c)</bold> the vertical distance from the mean lapse-rate tropopause (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) and of <bold>(b, d)</bold> the equivalent latitude (90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the centre of the AMA as projected to polar coordinates). Data points are coloured by flight date <bold>(a, b)</bold> and by CO mixing ratios <bold>(c, d)</bold>. <bold>(e)</bold> The mean particle mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the equivalent latitude is colour-coded by the values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (colour scale on the left of panel <bold>e</bold>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page11701?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>The occurrence of NPF relative to the tropopause height and the AMA's centre</title>
      <p id="d1e5822">Figure 6 illustrates the mean mixing ratio of nucleation-mode particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> measured during the individual NPF events as a
function of (1) the vertical distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> to the lapse-rate tropopause (Fig. 6a and c) and (2) the mean equivalent latitude
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>equ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6b and d). NPF events above the lapse-rate tropopause (Fig. 6a; positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were mainly observed during the first half of the StratoClim 2017 mission (KTM 2, KTM 3, and KTM 5 on 29 July, 31 July, and 4 August 2017, respectively, with a maximum ceiling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 475 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or during the last mission flight (KTM 8, on 10 August 2017, with a maximum ceiling
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 435 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). All further observations up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 425 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were located below the lapse-rate tropopause (negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, down to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or in its close vicinity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; e.g. KTM 6, 6 August 2017, with a maximum ceiling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), i.e. in or above the region of the main convective outflow. As indicated by Bucci et al. (2020) and von Hobe et al. (2021), the first half of the StratoClim 2017 mission was characterised by weak convection, while the convective activity increased as the campaign progressed.</p>
      <p id="d1e6020">With respect to the AMA centre, most NPF events were encountered north of 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> equivalent latitude (Fig. 6b). An exception is a flight segment
of flight KTM 3 (on 31 July 2017), where weak NPF with mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500–1300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was detected at the farthest distance from the AMA centre (near the turning point at about 21.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E geographic coordinates; see
Fig. 1). These measurements (at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>equ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) were made well above the tropopause since at positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) mean CO mixing ratios of 45–50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6c and d) were found, in agreement with satellite-based CO observations for altitudes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16–19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the AMA (Park et al., 2009).</p>
      <?pagebreak page11702?><p id="d1e6177">Towards the AMA centre (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>equ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), the NPF events are distributed over the entire range of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here, weak NPF with several hundreds of nucleation-mode particles per milligram was observed well above the lapse-rate tropopause (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The vertical distribution of the NPF events indicates that those events with the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and mainly elevated CO mixing ratios (65 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 137 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were encountered exclusively below the lapse-rate tropopause (to minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Regarding a relationship between (a) the position relative to the AMA centre and (b) the effectiveness of vertical transport or the NPF rate, the StratoClim 2017 data show that between 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N equivalent latitude, there is no indication that the mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO depend on the position with respect to the AMA centre. Close to the AMA centre (60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and in an altitude range of almost <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> around tropopause heights, both the distribution of CO-enriched air masses and the occurrence of NPF appear to be largely independent from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>equ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Persistence of particles in the nucleation mode</title>
      <p id="d1e6414">Coagulation represents one of the main processes limiting the persistence of nucleation-mode particles, i.e. the duration during which freshly formed
particles remain in the size range of the nucleation mode. At elevated number densities, the highly diffusive nucleation-mode particles collide and
coagulate with each other and with the present background aerosols on short timescales. Gaseous precursors, which are saturated or supersaturated
under NPF conditions, may condense and additionally contribute to the growth of particles out of the nucleation-mode size range, which is considered
to be a secondary process.</p>
      <p id="d1e6417">The aerosol size distribution, which was compiled from the measurements during an NPF event as input for the coagulation simulation (see Sect. 3.2), is depicted in Fig. 7 (black circles with horizontal bars indicating the width of their respective particle size bins of the model). The simulated change in the initial aerosol size distribution due to coagulation is shown in 1 h steps in different colours and line types (Fig. 7a). From this simulation, the temporal decay of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was derived (Fig. 7b, solid black line), whereby the gradient of this decay illustrates the coagulation rate. The sequence of the simulated size distributions indicates that the initial number of nucleation-mode particles is reduced by coagulation within a few hours. Within the first hour after an expired NPF event the nucleation mode is no longer predominant in the overall size distribution, as seen from the maximum of the distribution at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 1 h of simulated coagulation (solid red line in Fig. 7a). Hence, with adopted instruments for the detection of nucleation-mode particles, a clear NPF signature is identified only while NPF is just proceeding or for a very short time immediately after an expired NPF event.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e6459">Results of a coagulation simulation based on the assumption of a distinct and expired burst-like event. The simulation's initial particle size distribution (black circles; horizontal bars indicate the width of each size bin) is merged from data of three COPAS detectors (for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and of the UHSAS-A (65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as detected during NPF encountered on 4 August 2017, between 04:04:40 and 04:05:06 UTC. <bold>(a)</bold> The processing particle size distribution (coloured lines) over several hours. <bold>(b)</bold> The concentration of nucleation-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the simulation's runtime and its fractional contribution to the total particle number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Furthermore, the simulated decay of variably multiplied <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (by factors of 0.1, 10, and 100) as initial input of the simulation under constant background conditions (dashed lines).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page11703?><p id="d1e6586">The concentration of nucleation-mode particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases steeply over time (Fig. 7b). From initially <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of nucleation-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the earliest stage, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> falls below 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) within about 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the grey shaded areas serve for reference). The detection of 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of nucleation-mode particles, however, would be interpreted as an NPF event of intermediate strength (see Sect. 2.2.1). In addition, coagulation leads to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during less than 4 h and to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of less than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within 9 h. The efficiently proceeding coagulation impedes the identification of NPF based on in situ detections, and it is required to be at the NPF site at the right time. This circumstance is corroborated by tests concerning the sensitivity of the simulation to varying input parameters. For these tests, the input in the nucleation mode was modified while keeping constant background aerosol conditions. In three further simulation runs, the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was multiplied by the factors 0.1, 10, and 100, respectively
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; dashed lines in Fig. 7b). Increased initial concentrations of nucleation-mode
particles, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, last only for about 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the original <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black line in
Fig. 7b). The initial values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drop very quickly due to elevated coagulation rates, and in both of these cases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fall below 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within less than 1 h. The threshold of 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is crossed after less than 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or after 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Therefore, NPF events, which produce much higher concentrations of nucleation-mode particles, require even shorter time periods for a successful detection (e.g. by COPAS) after their expiration. However, for the simulation of decreased concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the coagulation rates remain nearly constant, as indicated from the almost identical decays of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 7b). Simulated concentration of nucleation-mode particles falls below 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within almost the same time from the initial values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Further investigation on the sensitivity of the simulation to the pressure and temperature conditions that were assumed as simulation input did not reveal any significant dependence unless the input is varied by more than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the used values of the respective parameter (not shown here).</p>
      <p id="d1e7163">Based on these estimations, the detection of elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates that an event with high NPF rates is currently proceeding, or a
recently expired NPF event was observed. Detections of lower values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could indicate (a) intermediate or weak (currently proceeding) NPF at low supersaturation of the NPF precursor or (b) an NPF event (e.g. of high particle productivity) that has phased out several hours before the observation. NPF is measured in situ, while the formation event is currently in progress or at most a few hours later. Therefore, the short periods of time available for a clear NPF detection and the still frequent NPF encounters on each measurement flight during StratoClim 2017 indicate the
prevalence of such events within the AMA.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e7190">Particle mixing ratio of fine-mode particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (grey dots in the background) and of nucleation-mode particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (colour-coded with reference to the potential temperature) in relationship to the CO mixing ratio. The median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the 25th and 75th percentile is shown in bin widths of 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the CO mixing ratio (black dots).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>NPF's connection to ground sources and vertical transport</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>NPF in relationship to CO as a pollution indicator</title>
      <p id="d1e7266">NPF events with moderate numbers of nucleation-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the lower-TTL region were previously attributed to CO mixing ratios above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (60–70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was assumed to be a typical CO background in the pristine marine boundary layer; cf. Weigel et al., 2011). Elevated concentrations of nucleation-mode particles (of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at altitudes of 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 360 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were associated with significantly increased CO mixing ratios of more than 85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Weigel et al., 2011). These results, mainly based on two single NPF events over West Africa (SCOUT AMMA, 2008), could have indicated a correlation between NPF rates and CO load from pollution. However, almost 100 individual event observations (Sect. 4.4 and Fig. 6c and d) indicate that the relationship between pollution level and NPF rates is less direct than expected. In Fig. 8, the 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolved data of synchronous detections of CO and particle mixing ratio during the entire StratoClim 2017 mission are compared. To illustrate the relative scattering of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the total particle mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in the background (grey dots), and the mixing ratio of particles in nucleation mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dots coloured with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is displayed in the foreground.</p>
      <p id="d1e7468">At altitudes below the tropopause (below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where NPF rates lead to the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the relationship between the
1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the CO mixing ratio is highly variable. At CO levels of 80–100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
scatter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the absolute maximum of about 50 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
exclusively reached at CO mixing ratios of 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At the maximum CO mixing ratio
(i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), particle mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of about 6000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (median value) were detected. Within a range of CO content between 85 and 130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (median) mixing ratios ranged consistently between 2000 and
10 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, apart from the notable exception at about 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. CO mixing ratios between 60 and
80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were detected just below or at tropopause levels (yellow to orange colours) coincidently with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from about 3000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to values below 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For CO mixing ratios below 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> almost
stagnates between 300 and 1300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At tropopause levels and aloft, the decreasing CO mixing ratio as well as abating NPF (expressed in
decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values) likely results from both the degradation of CO (see von Hobe et al., 2021) and the lacking supply of NPF precursor material by direct transport. According to von Hobe et al. (2021) any indication is missing that convection penetrated the tropopause during the StratoClim 2017 period. However, Lee et al. (2019) investigated the TTL-hydrating influence of an overshooting event that occurred in the Sichuan Basin about 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before the StratoClim measurements southbound of Kathmandu over north-eastern India (M-55 <italic>Geophysica</italic>, KTM 7 on 8 August 2017). Hence, there is no clear indication for a direct relationship between CO-enriched (polluted) air and the NPF rate.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e7853">From backward trajectory analyses by means of the chemistry transport model ClaMS and based on ERA5 data. <bold>(a)</bold> The geographic position of the last boundary layer (BL) contact of the NPF-connected air mass backward trajectories. <bold>(b)</bold> The geographic position of the maximum ascent rate. Subpanels a.i and a.ii (b.i and b.ii) provide two-level zoom-ins of the respective main panel <bold>(a)</bold> or <bold>(b)</bold> based on the same data set. The backward trajectories were analysed over the last 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> prior to the NPF detection as a starting point of each trajectory. Here, the data points are coloured with reference to the (logarithmic) mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of nucleation-mode particles; grey data points indicate transport times <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e7912">Structured as in Fig. 9. <bold>(a)</bold> The last boundary layer (BL) contact of the NPF-connected air mass backward trajectories. <bold>(b)</bold> The maximum ascent rate of these trajectories (for details of the trajectory analyses with ClaMS, see Fig. 9). Here, the data points are coloured to the air mass transport time since the last BL contact; grey data points indicate transport times <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>NPF and air mass origin in the boundary layer</title>
      <p id="d1e7950">The assignment of certain measurement sections of elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to possible source regions of NPF precursors is carried out in two steps:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <?pagebreak page11704?><p id="d1e7966">The backward trajectories were traced down to the boundary layer (BL) for each measurement point (see Sect. 3.3) at which NPF was detected (Fig. 9a and b). In this way, the geographical position of the last BL contact of the air before the observations (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution) of elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ( 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is obtained throughout the StratoClim 2017 mission (Fig. 9a). In addition, the geographical position of the trajectories' fastest uplift during their transport history was determined (Fig. 9b).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e8003">The ERA5 reanalysis data were examined with regard to the transport time of the trajectories between the position in the BL and the coordinates of the measurement point (Fig. 10a and b). The transport time is then coupled with the geographical position of the last BL contact of the air before the NPF observations (Fig. 10a) and the position of the trajectories' fastest uplift in their transport history (Fig. 10b). According to the distribution of the trajectories' latest BL contact with reference to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio (Fig. 9a), hardly any systematic structure is visible (the close-up views in Fig. 10a.ii and a.ii provide a new scaling and arrangement of the points of identical data set). The possible source regions are distributed over the entire region almost independently of the NPF intensity. The last BL contact of some trajectories was at locations far away from the monsoon region (e.g. in the west: the east coast of Africa and the Gulf of Aden; in the east: Indochina, the South China Sea, and as far as the Philippine Sea). The entire possible source area of NPF precursors ranges from the north of India and the Arabian Sea, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Southwest China, Taiwan, the Philippines, and the Bay of Bengal.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e8017">Locations of fastest vertical updraught are more compactly distributed (Fig. 9b, close-up views in Fig. 9b.ii and b.ii) and better reflect the contours of an area where efficient convection frequently occurs within the monsoon region. The fastest updraught with simultaneously increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is found in the Kathiawar region on the Indian west coast towards the Arabian Sea or in the far north of India (in the areas around Ladakh, Himachal Pradesh, and eastern Punjab). In areas of the central Tibetan Plateau, some sites were identified with elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where also the fastest vertical upward transport occurred. Finally, the shape of the Himalayas is traced by the locations with the fastest vertical air mass transport over a wide range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e8053">Also the shortest transport times from the BL are found around the Himalayas and their foothills, whereas the transport times from locations
of air's last BL contact, which fall south of 25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, west of 72<inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, or east of 96<inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, are rarely shorter than
10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Fig. 10 (Fig. 10a and b; see also respective close-up view), the contour of the Himalayas is clearly reproduced by the
distribution of the data points (transport times of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and fastest vertical updraught). Hence, for the duration of the
StratoClim 2017 mission, the convective uplift mainly occurred within the AMA. This more compact regional distribution of vertical uplift (Fig. 10b)
is possibly related to the occurrence of a <italic>vertical conduit</italic> for upward transport in the monsoon, as conjectured by Bergman
et al. (2013). Figure 10 also indicates air masses of elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which have experienced convective uplift over Tajikistan and northern
Afghanistan as well as over regions around the Yellow Sea, the Korean Peninsula, or Japan, hence far away from the AMA system.</p>
      <p id="d1e8121">Figures 9 and 10 both finally show that the region of the air's last BL contact and the location of the fastest vertical uplift do not
necessarily coincide. Similarly, the locations of the<?pagebreak page11705?> fastest updraught do not always match the shortest transport times, but for most cases in the
immediate vicinity of the Himalayas this correlation is clearly visible from the StratClim 2017 data set. Ultimately, it cannot be excluded that,
within the free troposphere, the air is subject to loading from various source regions (not exclusively from the location of the last BL contact)
prior to its convective uplift. Of course, this finding complicates an unambiguous apportioning of NPF to specific source regions of precursors in the BL.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e8127">Vertical profile of the 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolved particle mixing ratio of nucleation-mode particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> colour-coded by the air mass transport time (days) from the boundary layer (BL). For details of ClaMS analyses, see Figs. 9 and 10.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e8155">The vertical distribution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios as a function of the air mass transport time from the BL is shown in Fig. 11:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e8171">Above 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, almost all observations of enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are associated with air mass transport times of more than
12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, none of the detected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is connected to air mass transport times of less than
12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that were several times higher (with 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were detected below 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in air masses, which
had experienced more than 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of transport time from the BL.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <?pagebreak page11707?><p id="d1e8297">Below 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the transport times are variably distributed over the altitude range between 350 and 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The air masses with
shortest transport times are located in the height interval between 360 and 370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As shown by a recently published investigation, these air
masses have presumably reached the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 360 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level (altitude of the main convective outflow) very quickly by an effective convective
transport and are then moved further aloft, towards 370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with much lower ascent rates (Vogel et al., 2019) due to the prevailing air mass
uplift within the AMA.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e8349">On occasion, very short transport times were found with maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at altitudes of about 367 and 370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the
highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are mostly not observed in air with such short transport times. Within 370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the detected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reaches extreme values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in air with transport times of up to 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Above 370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and below
355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> none of the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is associated with transport times of less than 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and here, the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were detected in air with transport times of up to 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, based on the observations and the trajectories analysed here, the
altitude band of the main convective outflow is limited to a range between 355–370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>The relationship between NPF and convective outflow</title>
      <p id="d1e8509">For the following analysis, which is summarised in Fig. 12, the vertical distribution of the mean mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of the respective NPF event (see Sects. 2.2.1 and 4.4) is juxtaposed with
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>a.</label>
      <p id="d1e8528">a measure for the convective contribution to the composition of the probed air mass
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p></list-item><list-item><label>b.</label>
      <p id="d1e8533">the mean transport time within the TTL since their release from the top of individual convective cells (see Sect. 3.4 for both variables).</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e8538">Vertical profile of the event-wise mean particle mixing ratio of nucleation-mode particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> with standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (bars) as a function of the mean potential temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(a)</bold> The data points are colour-coded by the proportion of convective contribution to the air sample. <bold>(b)</bold> The data points are coloured by the time (days) since the release of the air mass at the top of a convective cell.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=221.931496pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e8589">Figure 12a broadly confirms the general understanding that the main outflow region of deep convection is well below the tropical tropopause (i.e. at
350–370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and aloft the air is still rising but at a much lower vertical velocity. At altitudes above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the observed
NPF events with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generally remain in the lower range of moderate intensity (see Sect. 2.2.1), although there was one of the rare observations of overshooting convection up to levels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 385 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where NPF was detected in coincidence with ice cloud elements (cf. Weigel et al., 2021). Hence, if in exceptional cases the outflow region of deep convection extends above the 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level, as indicated by the presence of ice<?pagebreak page11708?> cloud elements, then high NPF rates are not necessarily to be expected. Below 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, about two-thirds of all events are connected to convective influence by more than 75 %. However, a remarkable proportion of observations below 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate convective contributions of less than 60 % and down to 25 %. Below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 375 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, mean mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1000–2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were associated with 100 % convective contribution, and mixing ratios of more than 10 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were sometimes observed in air masses with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 % convective contribution.</p>
      <p id="d1e8756">For the observed NPF events, Fig. 12b shows the mean age of the probed air masses since their release from the top of individual convective
cells. Above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the air escaped the convection top mainly 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (or more) prior to its probing. Two events at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 382
and at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 385 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, indicate a more recent convective uplift within 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before the air was sampled. Despite the
comparatively short transport times, here, the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> remained below 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At altitudes below
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the air predominantly resided within the TTL region for less than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> prior to the observation. Nevertheless, some of
the comparatively intensive NPF events (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7000–15 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 360–375 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were
observed in air, which has been released from associated clouds' top more than a week (and up to 2 weeks) prior to the measurements. It should be
considered, however, that short air mass transport times within the TTL are indicated also for NPF events with minor convective contribution
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %).</p>
      <p id="d1e8923">From the StratoClim 2017 database emerges that NPF occurs at the lower TTL (i.e. below the tropopause) of the AMA in air masses that have been lifted
by convection in time intervals ranging from 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to about 2 weeks. However, it remains unclear whether in some of the observed events the
air samples were taken at a very advanced stage of NPF. Therefore, it can only be surmised whether or how often the short time period was missed
during which NPF is detectable by aircraft-based measurements. Potential uncertainties remain to be considered in connection with the uncertainty in
the reanalysis data and the representation of the transport history of the air masses.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Potential impact of gravity waves on vapours' supersaturation</title>
      <p id="d1e8943">If the lifted precursor material would be suitable for NPF and sufficiently enriched right upon release from the convective outflow, the relationship
between elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and convective transport should be clearer than observed (see Sect. 5). The lack of an unambiguous relationship indicates that the recently transported material is deposed in the TTL but not immediately consumed, e.g. by NPF, although the presence of ammonium in the aerosol phase (Höpfner et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020) or organics should promote the NPF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the TTL even at low supersaturations (Metzger et al., 2010; Kerminen et al., 2010; Kirkby et al., 2011; Kürten (2019); Wang et al., 2020). The supersaturation required for initiating NPF could temporally result from local cooling. Gravity waves (GWs) represent low-frequency inertial perturbations of the initial atmospheric state. Such a perturbation is expressed particularly by a change in velocity of the vertical wind component. The passage of a GW is associated with a change in the vertical displacement of an air parcel and thus causes locally an adiabatic heating or cooling by a certain absolute value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e8986">List of parameters of the wave fit to identify the wave character of two temperature anomalies, which were coincidently observed with two NPF events, respectively, during the StratoClim flight KTM 6 on 6 August 2017.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Fit</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPF period 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0025</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">193.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.00925</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPF period 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0025</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">193.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e9266">Piani et al. (2000) provided simulations of GWs initiated by deep convection. Their studies reveal a concentric propagation of GWs at altitudes above
15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with wavelengths in the horizontal of about 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
vertical. Similar results were found to be typical by other simulation studies concerning GW propagation at mid-latitudes (Song et al., 2003; Chun and
Kim, 2008) or in the tropics (Lane and Moncrieff, 2008). Investigations related to GWs in connection with the monsoon are sparse; e.g. Wright and
Gille (2011) and Ern and Preusse (2012) used satellite observations (high-resolution dynamics limb sounder) which, however, are limited to detections
of GWs with horizontal wavelengths greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Despite the numerous observational studies concerning GW properties (Alexander
et al., 2010), the indirect retrieval of GWs' horizontal wavelengths remains uncertain by a factor of 2 (or more), whereas instrumental limitations
inhibit the GW detection at horizontal wavelengths smaller than 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on radiosonde measurements (Vincent and Alexander, 2000), a
6-year-averaged amplitude of 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reported as an effect of GWs, with a single-case example of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> amplitude around
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude in the tropics.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e9374">Time series of data sampled during a section of a StratoClim 2017 flight (KTM 6) on 6 August 2017. Except the manoeuvre period between 09:20 and 09:30 (UTC), a constant altitude and pressure level <bold>(a)</bold> were maintained. Particle mixing ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(b)</bold>, the mixing ratio of the nucleation-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(c)</bold>, the CO mixing ratio <bold>(d)</bold>, and the ambient air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>amb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the temperature fluctuation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>amb</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(e)</bold> feature different characteristics and sequence during two NPF phases (oblique hatched areas).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e9488">Close-up view of the two sections of StratoClim 2017 flight KTM 6 on 6 August 2017 over time ranges of more than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of flight time, respectively, including the two identified NPF periods (horizontal bar in panels <bold>a</bold> and <bold>b</bold>). For analysing the observed temperature anomaly, the 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolved temperature data are filtered by the noise-reducing running average over 201 data points (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The wave fit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Fit</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is approximated to the noise-filtered data set within the period of identified NPF (see Appendix B for details). The overlaid fit function approximates the characteristic structure of the observed temperature anomaly only within the two NPF periods.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f14.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page11710?><p id="d1e9542">Satellite images over the Indian subcontinent (e.g. from MSG-1 or HIMAWARI; see <uri>https://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ptree/index.html</uri>, last access: 30 July 2021) indicate quite frequent occurrences of convective plumes in the sampling areas during the StratoClim 2017 mission period, which were occasionally arranged in chains of convective cells along the Himalayan foothills. The StratoClim flight KTM 6 on 6 August 2017 enabled NPF observations immediately connected to convection, which penetrated through the flight level on passage at constant flight altitude. The corresponding part of the time series shown in Fig. 13 covers the probing period in the air sector over Bangladesh and the Bay of Bengal (see Fig. 1). Two phases of NPF observations are highlighted (hatched areas in Fig. 13), immediately before and after the period between 09:20 and 09:30 (UTC), during which the flight altitude changed from 16.2 to about 13.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with subsequent re-ascent to 16.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The manoeuvre above the northern part of the Bay of Bengal also marks the turning point of the mission flight path, and the two flanking NPF phases were encountered over the mainland near the coastlines of eastern India and Bangladesh (see Fig. 1b). The outbound and return sections of the flight passed through the same convectively active region, and the same convective system was likely probed at opposite positions.</p>
      <p id="d1e9564">Within the limits of the displayed time series (Fig. 13a) constant flight altitude and pressure level were maintained, except for the turning
manoeuvre, which is disregarded in the following discussion. The mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coincidentally exhibited increased
values of variable strength (Fig. 13b), whereas during both NPF phases the particle mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are elevated
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M809" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or peak up to values of more than 20 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The course of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not mirrored by the CO
signal (Fig. 13d); e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is at maximum values when CO is still at intermediate levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In both
NPF phases, the peaks of air's CO content (130–140 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 13d) were accompanied by increasing mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>nv</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
by a factor of up to 2 compared to the background (Fig. 13b), indicating the passage through the convective outflow plume, which also contained
non-volatile aerosol material that was lifted together with gaseous pollutants.</p>
      <p id="d1e9724">During the periods of the NPF observations, however, the ambient air temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>amb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 13e) visibly fluctuates on the order of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M819" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> around the respective mean temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 193 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with standard deviation below 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Over the
NPF period, the time series of the temperature fluctuation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>amb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 13e) exhibits the shape of a wave.</p>
      <p id="d1e9818">Figure 14 shows close-ups of the time series covering slightly more than 1 h of measurement on a level flight, including the two periods of
observed NPF (Fig. 14a and b, respectively). The curves exhibit the untreated 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature data set (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the
noise-filtered data set (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The filtering was applied using a running average over 201 data points (see Appendix B for details). The filtered data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are additionally approximated with an overlaid wave fit (see Appendix B and Table 2), which aimed at the requirement to reproduce the temperature variation, in particular during the periods of NPF observation. The noise level over the intervals of the mapped time series holds a fairly constant standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In maxima, the scattering peaks slightly above the 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> noise level (i.e. about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which likely accounts for the largest proportion of uncertainty in the temperature data for this measurement period. The applied fit functions reproduce the wave-like character of the temperature fluctuation during two NPF events with estimated wavelengths between 70 and 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (for the higher frequency and in the range of 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the lower frequency). The quality of approximating the noise-reduced data by overlaid wave fit provides indications that the observed temperature fluctuation is subject to a wave that coincides well with the occurrence of NPF.</p>
      <p id="d1e9929">It would go beyond the scope of this study to clearly attribute this temperature fluctuation to the GW activity initiated by one specific or several convective systems. However, the amplitude and wavelength of the observed fluctuation correspond qualitatively and quantitatively to the values typical for GWs. Simplified estimates reveal that an increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation ratio by a factor of about 1.75–2 readily occurs when the initial ambient temperature (e.g. at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 190 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) drops by 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Appendix B). If NPF is initialised by a negative temperature anomaly under supersaturated conditions, the newly formed nucleation-mode<?pagebreak page11711?> particles hardly evaporate at re-rising temperatures
(e.g. when the GW-induced temperature anomaly becomes positive).</p>
      <p id="d1e9982">The horizontal extent of GW-induced temperature anomalies, which can range from a few to hundreds of kilometres, is generally comparable with the
magnitude of the horizontal extent of observed NPF fields (see Sects. 2.2.1 and 4.3 as well as Fig. 5c). Since the time offset between NPF observation and NPF initiation is not exactly known, it is not straightforward to connect individual NPF events to specific incidents of GW-induced temperature anomalies. Moreover, during the monsoon season, several widely distributed convective systems may induce GWs at the same time, and the resulting spatially propagating temperature anomalies could interfere at TTL heights. The amplification of temperature anomalies inherent with such interferences is neither locally resolvable nor quantifiable. Hence, GW-induced temperature anomalies can additionally promote the occurrence of NPF.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>7</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e9993">Between 27 July and 10 August 2017 the airborne StratoClim 2017 mission took place in Kathmandu, Nepal, with eight mission flights
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of COPAS measurement time above 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">≳</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M849" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) up to altitudes of 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 475 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the Russian high-altitude research aircraft M-55 <italic>Geophysica</italic>. The presented analysis comprises the
description and discussion of numerous events of new particle formation (NPF), which were observed in the UTLS region of the Asian monsoon
anticyclone (AMA) over northern India, Nepal, and Bangladesh.</p>
      <p id="d1e10075">In total, a duration of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 38.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was spent under NPF conditions in the region of the tropical tropopause layer (TTL), where
enhanced quantities of nucleation-mode particles of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M857" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M859" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were detected at heights of 15–16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M860" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M862" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The majority of NPF observations with high numbers of nucleation-mode particles
(6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M863" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M865" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were observed below the tropopause (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M868" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12–16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M869" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M870" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 355–380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M871" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
at the lower TTL. NPF with intermediate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M872" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000–2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M874" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300–500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M875" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) mixing ratios of nucleation-mode particles was also observed around the tropopause (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M876" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M877" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and up to about 17.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M878" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude (400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M879" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The frequency of intense NPF observed during StratoClim 2017 exceeds all previous NPF detections with COPAS in the TTL over Brazil, Australia, and West Africa (TROCCINOX, 2005; SCOUT-O3, 2005; SCOUT-AMMA, 2006; cf. Borrmann et al., 2010; Weigel et al., 2011). The maximum of detected nucleation-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M881" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, correspondent to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M882" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M883" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under ambient conditions at 360 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M884" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M885" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M887" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M888" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is of orders of magnitude comparable to the earlier COPAS observations (Borrmann et al., 2010; Weigel et al., 2011). The horizontal extent of the NPF fields during StratoClim 2017, ranging from a few hundred metres to about 100 km, compares well to previous COPAS observations in the tropics.</p>
      <p id="d1e10387"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Mainly due to coagulation, the persistence of nucleation-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M889" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M890" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M891" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the presence of the background
aerosol population is limited to a few hours only. Within the supersaturated environment under NPF conditions, co-condensation of gaseous species other
than NPF precursors further promotes the growth of nucleation-mode particles. The comparatively short persistence of the particles in the
nucleation-mode size range implies the following:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10419">Within 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after an NPF event, the number concentration of nucleation-mode particles decays due to coagulation by more than 1 order of
magnitude.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10431">About 3–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M893" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after an NPF event, the reduced number of nucleation-mode particles impedes the identification of NPF events based on
aircraft-borne in situ measurements.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10443">Low and intermediate numbers of nucleation-mode particles result from either moderate and just-proceeding NPF or from an event with elevated
NPF rate that has phased out over more than 2 h before the measurement.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10447">Identified NPF events with a great abundance of nucleation-mode particles (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M894" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M895" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) have occurred very shortly (less than 1 h) prior to the measurement or are just proceeding when detected.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e10471">The supersaturated conditions, under which NPF occurs also favour the co-condensation of gaseous substances (Yu et al., 2017). Whether or not coagulation or
condensation predominantly contributes to the composition of the background aerosol remains open. Most likely, both processes impact the formation and
persistence of the ATAL (Vernier et al. 2011a; see also Höpfner et al., 2019; Mahnke et al., 2021), which was mainly attributed to the
uplift of pollution from the boundary layer (Vernier et al., 2018; Brunamonti et al., 2018; Hanumanthu et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e10475">Generally, a refractory core with diameter greater than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was detected in almost every second particle above 395 and up to
475 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition to the local particle source by NPF, additional particulate material is vertically transported by the updraught within the
AMA (see also Sect. 6). At altitudes above 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M898" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the contribution of meteoric particles from further aloft was found by means of in situ
aerosol mass spectrometry during StratoClim 2017 (Schneider et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e10502">At altitudes of up to 17.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M899" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the fresh particles from NPF are in place for being lifted by a sufficiently effective transport mechanism to
indirectly supply the stratospheric (Junge) aerosol layer. However, whether or not aerosol material subsides from TTL levels to mid-tropospheric altitudes and possibly contributes to cloud formation, as suggested by Andreae et al. (2018) to happen in the Amazon region, depends on the efficiency of downward transport and on the aerosol's capability as CCN. Condensation of gaseous species other than those involved in the NPF process and internal chemical<?pagebreak page11712?> conversion of various solutes within a particle influence the aerosols' CCN capabilities. The required transport times to reach altitudes far above or below the TTL range from several days to weeks and stay in contrast to the short persistence (hours) of nucleation-mode particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e10513">Moreover, the StratoClim 2017 measurements revealed the following:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10518">The highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M900" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were predominantly found to coincide with intermediate to elevated CO mixing ratios of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M901" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M902" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Beyond that, the mixing ratio of nucleation-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M903" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 700–20 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M904" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is largely
independent of the CO content (between 80 and 145 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M905" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the air at the lower TTL.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10596">The most intensive uplift of air was confirmed to occur over the Himalayas and their foothills. However, particular source regions of NPF precursors were not ascertainable within the BL. No indication was found that the most intense NPF was connected to short durations of air mass transport from the BL into the TTL.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10600">The convective contribution to the air mass composition did not determine the intensity of the observed NPF. The release of the precursor
material in the outflow region of the convective top had occurred up to 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M906" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before the NPF observation. Occasionally, however, air mass
residence times of more than 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M907" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and up to 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M908" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were found at TTL levels prior to the NPF detection, while the entire data set covers
residence times from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M909" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M910" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to about 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M911" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e10651">For the period of the StratoClim 2017 mission, the observed NPF rates are not unambiguously attributable to (a) a specific source region in the BL, (b) the effectiveness of the convective vertical transport, or (c) the recent release of NPF-capable material from the convective outflow.</p>
      <p id="d1e10654"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Nevertheless, it is the convective uplift which intermittently supplies the lower TTL with NPF precursor material. At altitudes well above tropopause levels, such an immediate supply by convection is lacking and could alternatively only proceed by the slow uplift superimposed on the anticyclonic ascent of the AMA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M912" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M913" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Vogel et al., 2019; von Hobe et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e10679">Alternatively, adiabatic cooling could induce sufficient supersaturation of an NPF precursor e.g. due to temperature anomalies associated with gravity
waves (GWs). The presented case study based on a continuous level-flight segment (flight KTM 6 on 6 August 2017) revealed wave-like temperature anomalies with a peak-to-peak amplitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M914" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M915" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M916" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a horizontal wavelength of 70–100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M917" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which matched well with two independent NPF events. Hence, the vertical propagation of GW-induced temperature anomalies can initialise NPF above tropopause levels (a) where ambient air temperatures re-increase with altitude (from observational data with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M918" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M919" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M920" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per <inline-formula><mml:math id="M921" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M922" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M923" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which principally counteracts the supersaturation of a precursor, and (b) where in the absence of deep convection a direct supply of precursor material from below is lacking.</p>
      <p id="d1e10767">The observations made during StratoClim 2017 demonstrate that frequent NPF with high production of nucleation-mode particles is capable of directly
affecting the extent and persistence of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer (ATAL). The continuous supply of freshly formed aerosol material, which
coagulates both internally and with the background aerosol and which itself provides a surface for the condensation of supersaturated gaseous
substances, contributes significantly to the available aerosol material that composes the ATAL. In this case, the chemical composition of the ATAL
aerosol includes significant fractions of the material which was previously involved in the NPF process and the particles' condensational growth,
which is subject to further investigation using the StratoClim 2017 data set.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page11713?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>The detection of non-volatile particles with COPAS</title>
      <p id="d1e10782">COPAS includes a vaporiser based on an established and commonly used technique. One of the four COPAS channels is equipped with a heated stainless steel tube (at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M924" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 270 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M925" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to vaporise volatile compounds upstream of one of the particle detectors. The specific heating temperature is chosen with the aim of vaporising mainly stratospheric particle species, which typically consist of aqueous solutions of sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M926" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M927" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and/or nitric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M928" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M929" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which reportedly volatilise at 180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M930" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Rosen, 1971). In addition, most volatile and several semi-volatile organic compounds can evaporate at colder temperatures than 270 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M931" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Conversely, this means that an undeterminable proportion of semi-volatile and probably highly oxidised organics, whose role as agents in NPF has been identified by Kurtén et al. (2008) or Riccobono et al. (2014), can pass through the preheater without being significantly
altered. Downstream of the heated tube section, the re-condensation of evaporated species is not completely excludable. Due to the high diffusivity of, for example, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M932" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules (a factor of up to 0.5 of the diffusivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M933" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Tang et al., 2014), the re-condensation is expected to occur predominantly at the tube's inner walls since thermophoresis drives the vapour molecules from the previously heated air sample towards the cold walls. Such a re-condensation affects the particles' size, not their number, and condensation on the largest of the non-volatile residues is favoured over the smaller ones (i.e. those with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M934" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M935" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M936" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The working principle of the COPAS aerosol vaporiser was demonstrated by means of laboratory experiments with pure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M937" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M938" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles of several sizes and at pressure conditions between 70–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M939" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Weigel et al., 2009); more than 98 % of the sub-micrometre-sized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M940" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M941" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles were volatilised. As the refractory material, which could be detectable with COPAS, is unlikely to be generated by the heater itself, such instrumental artefacts are largely excluded. To avoid artefacts as a result of, for example, re-suspension of aerosol material, which had been deposited on the tube's inner walls during previous operations, the sample lines were flush-cleaned with ethanol and distilled water at least before every second mission flight. Inefficiencies of the vaporiser, e.g. due to diminished heat transfer from the tube's inner wall to the passing aerosol particles, particularly at low atmospheric pressures, would cause the number (fraction) of detected refractory particles to be unexpectedly high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M942" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 %) over extended measurement periods, which was not observed throughout the field missions (cf. Borrmann et al., 2010; Weigel et al., 2011). Conversely, instrumental artefacts inherent to the vaporiser's tube length, e.g. particle loss, would lead to comparatively low number concentrations of detected refractory particles. Diffusional loss effects increase with decreasing pressure, but thermophoresis counteracts the particles' diffusion towards the hot tube walls. With the same vaporiser system, Weigel et al. (2014) observed rising mixing ratios of refractory aerosol, most likely from meteoric ablation, with altitude at stratospheric levels inside the polar vortex, while outside the vortex the number of refractory aerosols nearly stagnated over the corresponding altitude range, additionally confirming the principle function of the vaporiser.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{B}?><label>Appendix B</label><title>Case study analysis of observed temperature anomaly</title>
      <p id="d1e11020">For analysing the observed temperature anomaly in the time intervals of the NPF events, a running average is used as a filter to suppress the high-frequency noise in the temperature data. The running average over 201 measurement points (i.e. over 100 data points before and 100 data points after each 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M943" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature measurement) is used; Fig. B1 illustrates the effectiveness of the filtering. As a result of subtracting the low-pass-filtered temperature data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M944" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the initial 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M945" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolved temperature data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M946" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the high-frequency noise remains (red dots in Fig. B1). The noise scatters around the zero level with a maximum amplitude of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M947" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M948" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The filtering by the running mean turns out to be equally effective inside and outside the observed NPF events with presumed temperature fluctuation. The indicated reference lines for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M949" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M950" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M951" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M952" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels (where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M953" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the standard deviation) illustrate the noise amplitude, which remains fairly constant (during NPF and away from observed NPF events) over the entire period and also almost within the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M954" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M955" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range. The course of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M956" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curves thus represents the temperature fluctuation by excluding the noise which underlies the measurement. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M957" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curve is approximated by a wave fit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M958" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Fit</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for reproducing the temperature fluctuation in the filtered data set (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M959" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), particularly during the periods of NPF observation (see Sect. 6 and Fig. 14).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F15" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d1e11178">For the time intervals shown in Fig. 14, the difference between the 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M960" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M961" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the filtered data with 201 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M962" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> running average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M963" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) reveals the high-frequency noise of the temperature measurement (red data points). The dashed reference lines indicate the standard deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M964" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M965" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M966" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M967" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the noise signal within given time intervals. The effectiveness of the wave fit approximation to the filtered data set during the NPF periods is represented by the difference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M968" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Fit</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During NPF this deviation is small, while away from NPF the wave fit increasingly deviates from the temperature measurement. The deviation of the overlaid wave fit from the untreated 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M969" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal is shown with the differences <inline-formula><mml:math id="M970" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Fit</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; during NPF mainly the noise signal remains.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f15.png"/>

        <?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{2mm}}?>
      </fig>

      <p id="d1e11310">The basic form of the wave fit function is
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>B1</label><mml:math id="M971" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M972" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the horizontal distance derived from time (UTC) in seconds of the day (since midnight) and mean airspeed; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M973" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the amplitude; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M974" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the frequency; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M975" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the phase shift; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M976" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the offset.</p>
      <?pagebreak page11714?><p id="d1e11408">For each of the two time periods with identified NPF, an individual fit was determined with the parameters from Table 2, and each fit consists of a sum
of two functions of the type defined in Eq. (A1). During the NPF event the difference between the two curves, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M977" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M978" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Fit</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. B1), shows that the overlaid wave fit approximates the filtered data with a smaller deviation than given with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M979" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M980" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> noise
level. The difference between the 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M981" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature signal and the wave fit is also shown in Fig. B1. During the NPF event, the subtraction of
the wave fit from the 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M982" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data has almost the same effect as the subtraction of the filtered <inline-formula><mml:math id="M983" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M984" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; therefore, in the NPF period, the deviation between the two sets of data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M985" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Fit</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) corresponds mainly to the noise of the temperature measurement. Away from the NPF event, the deviation of the wave fit from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M986" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M987" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">201</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases as the approximation of the temperature data by the wave function was constrained to the NPF period.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{C}?><label>Appendix C</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The impact of a temperature anomaly on the saturation ratio of {$\protect\chem{H_{{2}}SO_{{4}}}$}}?><title>The impact of a temperature anomaly on the saturation ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M988" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e11565">The passage of a gravity wave is associated with adiabatic heating or cooling by a certain amount <inline-formula><mml:math id="M989" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. According to Vincent and Alexander (2000)
(see also Sect. 6), the maximum realistic value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M990" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M991" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M992" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Smaller temperature perturbations occur more frequently. An air
parcel at pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M993" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M994" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which is vertically and adiabatically displaced, changes its pressure and temperature to the new
values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M995" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M996" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M997" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M998" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The question arises as to how temperature anomalies influence the occurrence of NPF. In this context, NPF
is initialised when the saturation of a nucleating gas or gas mixture exceeds a certain level. Pure sulfuric acid is certainly not the exclusive gas
species involved in NPF, but if temperature anomalies sufficiently affect the saturation ratio of pure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M999" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then additional agents such
as ammonium (Höpfner et al., 2019) or organics (Kürten, 2019) could more readily favour the initiation of NPF.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S3.F16"><?xmltex \currentcnt{C1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure C1</label><caption><p id="d1e11682">Simulated influence of temperature anomalies (up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1000" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1001" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on the quotient of saturation ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1002" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of pure sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1003" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in reference to any initial saturation ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1004" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (including supersaturation) over a range of initial air temperatures at which NPF was observed during StratoClim 2017.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11689/2021/acp-21-11689-2021-f16.png"/>

        <?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{2mm}}?>
      </fig>

      <p id="d1e11750">Adiabaticity of the process is presumed, and by approximating the gas constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1005" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the heat capacity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1006" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the values for dry air
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1007" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1008" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1009" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1010" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1011" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1012" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the ideal gas equation can be converted such that the mixing ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1013" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>of sulfuric acid is related to its partial pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1014" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since the conditions within the AMA change rather
slowly, the mixing of air masses is considered to be negligible. Hence, the concentration of each gas species within the air parcel remains invariant to
the vertical displacement. In the following, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1015" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sulfuric acid partial pressure within the unperturbed air parcel. Denoting
the saturation vapour pressure of sulfuric acid as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1016" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the quotient of the saturation ratios of<?pagebreak page11715?> the unperturbed air parcel and the displaced air parcel reads as
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S3.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>C1</label><mml:math id="M1017" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>:=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pa</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pa</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pa</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e12330"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Figure C1 exhibits the quotient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1018" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. the factorial increase in the saturation ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1019" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in reference
to an initial saturation ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1020" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at undisturbed conditions, including supersaturated states) for several initial states of ambient air
temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1021" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (from 185 to 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1022" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and for a range of temperature anomalies with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1023" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of up to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1024" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is to be emphasised that these calculations relate specifically to the impact of temperature anomalies on the supersaturation of pure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1025" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These estimates based on ordinary precursors (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1026" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1027" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) do not allow for conclusions concerning the NPF efficiency of complex systems of precursor compositions (e.g. including ammonia or organics). The demonstrated effect, however, is qualitatively transferable to any gaseous substance, while the nucleation of particles from the gas phase requires sufficiently high saturation ratios of the respective species or gas mixture and may be of particular interest in the context of the CLOUD experiments at CERN with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1028" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (cf. Stolzenburg et al., 2020) under variable conditions and various admixtures.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e12471">The data shown in this study will be available from the HALO database at <uri>https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/mission/101</uri> (last access: 30 July 2021) (German Aerospace Center, 2021), or they may be provided by respective PI upon request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e12480">RW evaluated and analysed the data, created the figures, and drafted the manuscript with contributions by CM, MB, and AD. SB participated in the data analyses and the manuscript drafting. The code of the coagulation simulation was provided by BPL, and the code was adapted by MB, while the calculations were performed by CM. BV and FP contributed with meteorological reanalyses; BV, SiB, and BL performed the air mass trajectory analyses. SV and FD took care of the CO data. UCSE data were delivered by GB. The manuscript was reviewed by CM, MB, AD, BV, FP, SV, FD, SiB, BL, BPL, and SB.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e12486">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e12492">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e12499">This article is part of the special issue “StratoClim stratospheric and upper tropospheric processes for better climate predictions (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e12505">The contributions from the technical staff at the workshops of the MPI for Chemistry and the Institute for Physics of the Atmosphere (Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz) as well as the Myasishchev Design Bureau (MDB) were essential. In particular, we acknowledge the support of Thomas Böttger, Michael Flanz, and Wilhelm A. Schneider. We thank Young-Ha Kim, Peter Spichtinger, Holger Tost, Miklós Szakáll, Alexander Theis, Annette Miltenberger, Troy Thornberry, and the ACCLIP team for very helpful discussions. Many thanks to Thomas Peter for the planning of flight KTM 6 on 6 August 2017. The extraordinary commitment of Fred Stroh in realisation of the campaign and the leadership of the entire StratoClim project by Markus Rex are gratefully acknowledged. We very much thank the MDB crew and the M-55 <italic>Geophysica</italic> pilots. We explicitly thank the officials of the Nepalese government authorities, research institutions, and Tribhuvan Airport as well as of the German embassy in Nepal for their extraordinary support and hospitality, which enabled our field campaign and research.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e12513">Some of our research leading to the presented results received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) ERC grant agreement no. 321040 (EXCATRO). The StratoClim project was funded by the EU (FP7/2007-2018 grant no. 603557) and also supported by the German “Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung” (BMBF) under the joint ROMIC project SPITFIRE (01LG1205A). The work presented includes contributions to the NSFC–DFG 2020 project ATALtrack (BO 1829/12-1 and VO 1276/6-1).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e12519">This paper was edited by Martina Krämer and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alexander, M. J., Geller, M., McLandress, C., Polavarapu, S., Preusse, P., Sassi, F., Sato, K., Eckermann, S., Ern, M., Hertzog, A., Kawatani, Y., Pulido, M., Shaw, T. A., Sigmond, M., Vincent, R., and Watanabe, S.:
Recent developments in gravity-wave effects in climate models and the global distribution of gravity-wave momentum flux from observations and models,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
136, 1103–1124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.637" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.637</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 2?><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O., Afchine, A., Albrecht, R., Holanda, B. A., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Borrmann, S., Cecchini, M. A., Costa, A., Dollner, M., Fütterer, D., Järvinen, E., Jurkat, T., Klimach, T., Konemann, T., Knote, C., Krämer, M., Krisna, T., Machado, L. A. T., Mertes, S., Minikin, A., Pöhlker, C., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöschl, U., Rosenfeld, D., Sauer, D., Schlager, H., Schnaiter, M., Schneider, J., Schulz, C., Spanu, A., Sperling, V. B., Voigt, C., Walser, A., Wang, J., Weinzierl, B., Wendisch, M., and Ziereis, H.: Aerosol characteristics and particle production in the upper troposphere over the Amazon Basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 921–961, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-921-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-921-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 3?><mixed-citation>Barth, M. C., Stuart, A. L., and Skamarock, W. C.:
Numerical simulations of the July 10, 1996, Stratospheric-Tropospheric Experiment: Radiation, Aerosols, and Ozone (STERAO)-Deep Convection experiment storm: Redistribution of soluble tracers,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
106, 12381–12400, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd900139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001jd900139</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 4?><mixed-citation>Baumgartner, M., Weigel, R., Harvey, A. H., Plöger, F., Achatz, U., and Spichtinger, P.: Reappraising the appropriate calculation of a common meteorological quantity: potential temperature, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15585–15616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15585-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-15585-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation>Bergman, J. W., Jensen, E. J., Pfister, L., and Yang, Q.:
Seasonal differences of vertical-transport efficiency in the tropical tropopause layer: On the interplay between tropical deep convection, large-scale vertical ascent, and horizontal circulationes,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
117, D05302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016992" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011jd016992</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 6?><mixed-citation>Bergman, J. W., Fierli, F., Jensen, E. J., Honomichl, S., and Pan, L. L.:
Boundary layer sources for the Asian anticyclone: Regional contributions to a vertical conduit,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 2560–2575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50142</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 7?><mixed-citation>Bianchi, F., Junninen, H., Bigi, A., Sinclair, V. A., Dada, L., Hoyle, C. R., Zha, Q., Yao, L., Ahonen, L. R., Bonasoni, P., Buenrostro Mazon, S., Hutterli, M., Laj, P., Lehtipalo, K., Kangasluoma, J., Kerminen, V. M., Kontkanen, J., Marinoni, A., Mirme, S., Molteni, U., Petäjä, T., Riva, M., Rose, C., Sellegri, K., Yan, C., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Baltensperger, U., an<?pagebreak page11717?>d Dommen, J.:
Biogenic particles formed in the Himalaya as an important source of free tropospheric aerosols,
Nat. Geosci.,
14, 4–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-00661-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-020-00661-5</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 8?><mixed-citation>Borrmann, S., Kunkel, D., Weigel, R., Minikin, A., Deshler, T., Wilson, J. C., Curtius, J., Volk, C. M., Homan, C. D., Ulanovsky, A., Ravegnani, F., Viciani, S., Shur, G. N., Belyaev, G. V., Law, K. S., and Cairo, F.: Aerosols in the tropical and subtropical UT/LS: in-situ measurements of submicron particle abundance and volatility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5573–5592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5573-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5573-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 9?><mixed-citation>Brock, C. A., Hamill, P., Wilson, J. C., Jonsson, H. H., and Chan, K. R.:
Particle Formation in the Upper Tropical Troposphere: A Source of Nuclei for the Stratospheric Aerosol,
Science,
270, 1650–1653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2887916" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/2887916</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 10?><mixed-citation>Brock, C. A., Schröder, F., Kärcher, B., Petzold, A., Busen, R., and Fiebig, M.:
Ultrafine particle size distributions measured in aircraft exhaust plumes,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
105, 26555–26567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900360" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000jd900360</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 11?><mixed-citation>Brunamonti, S., Jorge, T., Oelsner, P., Hanumanthu, S., Singh, B. B., Kumar, K. R., Sonbawne, S., Meier, S., Singh, D., Wienhold, F. G., Luo, B. P., Boettcher, M., Poltera, Y., Jauhiainen, H., Kayastha, R., Karmacharya, J., Dirksen, R., Naja, M., Rex, M., Fadnavis, S., and Peter, T.: Balloon-borne measurements of temperature, water vapor, ozone and aerosol backscatter on the southern slopes of the Himalayas during StratoClim 2016–2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15937–15957, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 12?><mixed-citation>Bucci, S., Legras, B., Sellitto, P., D'Amato, F., Viciani, S., Montori, A., Chiarugi, A., Ravegnani, F., Ulanovsky, A., Cairo, F., and Stroh, F.: Deep-convective influence on the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere composition in the Asian monsoon anticyclone region: 2017 StratoClim campaign results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12193–12210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12193-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-12193-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 13?><mixed-citation>Campbell, P. and Deshler, T.:
Condensation nuclei measurements in the midlatitude (1982–2012) and Antarctic (1986–2010) stratosphere between 20 and 35 km,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
119, 2013JD019710, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd019710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013jd019710</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 14?><mixed-citation>Chirkov, M., Stiller, G. P., Laeng, A., Kellmann, S., von Clarmann, T., Boone, C. D., Elkins, J. W., Engel, A., Glatthor, N., Grabowski, U., Harth, C. M., Kiefer, M., Kolonjari, F., Krummel, P. B., Linden, A., Lunder, C. R., Miller, B. R., Montzka, S. A., Mühle, J., O'Doherty, S., Orphal, J., Prinn, R. G., Toon, G., Vollmer, M. K., Walker, K. A., Weiss, R. F., Wiegele, A., and Young, D.: Global HCFC-22 measurements with MIPAS: retrieval, validation, global distribution and its evolution over 2005–2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3345–3368, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3345-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3345-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 15?><mixed-citation>Chun, H.-Y. and Kim, Y.-H.: Secondary waves generated by breaking of convective gravity waves in the mesosphere and their influence in the wave momentum flux, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D23107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009792" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd009792</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 16?><mixed-citation>Crumeyrolle, S., Manninen, H. E., Sellegri, K., Roberts, G., Gomes, L., Kulmala, M., Weigel, R., Laj, P., and Schwarzenboeck, A.: New particle formation events measured on board the ATR-42 aircraft during the EUCAARI campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6721–6735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6721-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6721-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 17?><mixed-citation>Crutzen, P. J. and Lawrence, M. G.:
The impact of precipitation scavenging on the transport of trace gases: A 3-dimensional model sensitivity study,
J. Atmos. Chem.,
37, 81–112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006322926426" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1006322926426</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 18?><mixed-citation>Curtius, J., Weigel, R., Vössing, H.-J., Wernli, H., Werner, A., Volk, C.-M., Konopka, P., Krebsbach, M., Schiller, C., Roiger, A., Schlager, H., Dreiling, V., and Borrmann, S.: Observations of meteoric material and implications for aerosol nucleation in the winter Arctic lower stratosphere derived from in situ particle measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3053–3069, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3053-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-3053-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 20?><mixed-citation>Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J. J., Park, B. K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J. N., and Vitart, F.:
The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
137, 553–597, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.828</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 19?><mixed-citation>de Reus, M., Borrmann, S., Bansemer, A., Heymsfield, A. J., Weigel, R., Schiller, C., Mitev, V., Frey, W., Kunkel, D., Kürten, A., Curtius, J., Sitnikov, N. M., Ulanovsky, A., and Ravegnani, F.: Evidence for ice particles in the tropical stratosphere from in-situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6775–6792, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6775-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6775-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 21?><mixed-citation>Dunne, E. M., Gordon, H., Kürten, A., Almeida, J., Duplissy, J., Williamson, C., Ortega, I. K., Pringle, K. J., Adamov, A., Baltensperger, U., Barmet, P., Benduhn, F., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Clarke, A., Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Kupc, A., Lawler, M. J., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mann, G., Mathot, S., Merikanto, J., Miettinen, P., Nenes, A., Onnela, A., Rap, A., Reddington, C. L. S., Riccobono, F., Richards, N. A. D., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Sengupta, K., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Smith, J. N., Stozkhov, Y., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J., Wagner, P. E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., and Carslaw, K. S.:
Global atmospheric particle formation from CERN CLOUD measurements,
Science,
354, 1119–1124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aaf2649</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 22?><mixed-citation>Ekman, A. M. L., Wang, C., Strom, J., and Krejci, R.:
Explicit simulation of aerosol physics in a cloud-resolving model: Aerosol transport and processing in the free troposphere,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
63, 682–696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/Jas3645.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/Jas3645.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 23?><mixed-citation>Ern, M. and Preusse, P.: Gravity wave momentum flux spectra observed from satellite in the summertime subtropics: Implications for global modeling,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L15810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl052659" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012gl052659</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 24?><mixed-citation>Frey, W., Borrmann, S., Kunkel, D., Weigel, R., de Reus, M., Schlager, H., Roiger, A., Voigt, C., Hoor, P., Curtius, J., Krämer, M., Schiller, C., Volk, C. M., Homan, C. D., Fierli, F., Di Donfrancesco, G., Ulanovsky, A., Ravegnani, F., Sitnikov, N. M., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Shur, G. N., Belyaev, G. V., Law, K. S., and Cairo, F.: In situ measurements of tropical cloud properties in the West African Monsoon: upper tropospheric ice cloud<?pagebreak page11718?>s, Mesoscale Convective System outflow, and subvisual cirrus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5569–5590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5569-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5569-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 25?><mixed-citation>Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Lawson, P., Baumgardner, D., and Herman, R. L.: Aerosols that form subvisible cirrus at the tropical tropopause, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 209–218, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-209-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-209-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 26?><mixed-citation>Fujiwara, M., Sakai, T., Nagai, T., Shiraishi, K., Inai, Y., Khaykin, S., Xi, H., Shibata, T., Shiotani, M., and Pan, L. L.: Lower-stratospheric aerosol measurements in eastward-shedding vortices over Japan from the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone during the summer of 2018, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3073–3090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3073-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-3073-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 27?><mixed-citation>Garny, H. and Randel, W. J.: Transport pathways from the Asian monsoon anticyclone to the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2703–2718, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2703-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2703-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 27?><mixed-citation>German Aerospace Center: HALO database, available at:  <uri>https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/mission/101</uri>, last access: 30 July 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation>Glatthor, N., Hopfner, M., Baker, I. T., Berry, J., Campbell, J. E., Kawa, S. R., Krysztofiak, G., Leyser, A., Sinnhuber, B. M., Stiller, G. P., Stinecipher, J., and von Clarmann, T.:
Tropical sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide observed from space,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
42, 10082–10090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl066293" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015gl066293</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 29?><mixed-citation>Hanumanthu, S., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Brunamonti, S., Fadnavis, S., Li, D., Ölsner, P., Naja, M., Singh, B. B., Kumar, K. R., Sonbawne, S., Jauhiainen, H., Vömel, H., Luo, B., Jorge, T., Wienhold, F. G., Dirkson, R., and Peter, T.: Strong day-to-day variability of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer (ATAL) in August 2016 at the Himalayan foothills, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14273–14302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14273-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-14273-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 30?><mixed-citation>He, Q., Ma, J., Zheng, X., Yan, X., Vömel, H., Wienhold, F. G., Gao, W., Liu, D., Shi, G., and Cheng, T.: Observational evidence of particle hygroscopic growth in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) over the Tibetan Plateau, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8399–8406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8399-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8399-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 31?><mixed-citation>Hermann, M., Heintzenberg, J., Wiedensohler, A., Zahn, A., Heinrich, G., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.:
Meridional distributions of aerosol particle number concentrations in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere obtained by Civil Aircraft for Regular Investigation of the Atmosphere Based on an Instrument Container (CARIBIC) flights,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
108, 4114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001jd001077</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 32?><mixed-citation>
Hersbach, H. and Dee, D. P.:
ERA5 reanalysis is in production,
ECMWF Newsletter,
147, 7, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 33?><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, L., Günther, G., Li, D., Stein, O., Wu, X., Griessbach, S., Heng, Y., Konopka, P., Müller, R., Vogel, B., and Wright, J. S.: From ERA-Interim to ERA5: the considerable impact of ECMWF's next-generation reanalysis on Lagrangian transport simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3097–3124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3097-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-3097-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 34?><mixed-citation>Höpfner, M., Ungermann, J., Borrmann, S., Wagner, R., Spang, R., Riese, M., Stiller, G., Appel, O., Batenburg, A. M., Bucci, S., Cairo, F., Dragoneas, A., Friedl-Vallon, F., Hünig, A., Johansson, S., Krasauskas, L., Legras, B., Leisner, T., Mahnke, C., Möhler, O., Molleker, S., Müller, R., Neubert, T., Orphal, J., Preusse, P., Rex, M., Saathoff, H., Stroh, F., Weigel, R., and Wohltmann, I.:
Ammonium nitrate particles formed in upper troposphere from ground ammonia sources during Asian monsoons,
Nat. Geosci.,
12, 608–612, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0385-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-019-0385-8</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 35?><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.:
Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling,
Cambridge University Press, New York, 813 pp., 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 36?><mixed-citation>Jost, A., Szakáll, M., Diehl, K., Mitra, S. K., and Borrmann, S.: Chemistry of riming: the retention of organic and inorganic atmospheric trace constituents, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9717–9732, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9717-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-9717-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 37?><mixed-citation>Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., Manninen, H. E., Paasonen, P., Nieminen, T., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H., Ehn, M., Gagné, S., Laakso, L., Riipinen, I., Vehkamäki, H., Kurten, T., Ortega, I. K., Dal Maso, M., Brus, D., Hyvärinen, A., Lihavainen, H., Leppä, J., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Hőrrak, U., Berndt, T., Stratmann, F., Birmili, W., Wiedensohler, A., Metzger, A., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Mentel, T. F., Wildt, J., Winkler, P. M., Wagner, P. E., Petzold, A., Minikin, A., Plass-Dülmer, C., Pöschl, U., Laaksonen, A., and Kulmala, M.: Atmospheric nucleation: highlights of the EUCAARI project and future directions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10829–10848, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10829-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10829-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 38?><mixed-citation>Kerminen, V. M., Chen, X. M., Vakkari, V., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Bianchi, F.:
Atmospheric new particle formation and growth: review of field observations,
Environ. Res. Lett.,
13, 103003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/Aadf3c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/Aadf3c</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 39?><mixed-citation>Kirkby, J., Curtius, J., Almeida, J., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Franchin, A., Gagne, S., Ickes, L., Kurten, A., Kupc, A., Metzger, A., Riccobono, F., Rondo, L., Schobesberger, S., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Wimmer, D., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Downard, A., Ehn, M., Flagan, R. C., Haider, S., Hansel, A., Hauser, D., Jud, W., Junninen, H., Kreissl, F., Kvashin, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Lima, J., Lovejoy, E. R., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Mikkila, J., Minginette, P., Mogo, S., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Pereira, P., Petaja, T., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipila, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tome, A., Vanhanen, J., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Walther, H., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Winkler, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Kulmala, M.: Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia and galactic cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Nature, 476, 429–433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature10343</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 40?><mixed-citation>Konopka, P., Ploeger, F. and Müller, R.: Entropy-Based and Static Stability-Based Lagrangian Model Grids, in: Lagrangian Modeling of the Atmosphere, edited by: Lin, J., Brunner, D., Gerbig, C., Stohl, A., Luhar, A., and Webley, P., 99–109, available at: <uri>https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2012GM001253</uri> (last access: 30 July 2021), 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 41?><mixed-citation>Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T., Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A., Schwarz, J. P., Weigel, R., Fueglistaler, S., Prata, F. J., Vernier, J.-P., Schlager, H., Barnes, J. E., Antu na-Marrero, J.-C., Fairlie, D., Palm, M., Mahieu, E., Notholt, J., Rex, M., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Bourassa, A., Plane, J. M. C., Klocke, D., Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., Trickl, T., Neely, R., James, A. D., Rieger, L., Wilson, J. C., and Meland, B.: Stratospheric aerosol – Observations, processes, and impact on climate, Rev. Geophys., 54, 278–335, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015rg000511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015rg000511</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page11719?><ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 42?><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Vehkamaki, H., Petaja, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A., Kerminen, V. M., Birmili, W., and McMurry, P. H.:
Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations,
J. Aerosol. Sci.,
35, 143–176, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 43?><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Petaja, T., Sipila, M., Schobesberger, S., Rantala, P., Franchin, A., Jokinen, T., Jarvinen, E., Aijala, M., Kangasluoma, J., Hakala, J., Aalto, P. P., Paasonen, P., Mikkila, J., Vanhanen, J., Aalto, J., Hakola, H., Makkonen, U., Ruuskanen, T., Mauldin, R. L., Duplissy, J., Vehkamaki, H., Back, J., Kortelainen, A., Riipinen, I., Kurten, T., Johnston, M. V., Smith, J. N., Ehn, M., Mentel, T. F., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kerminen, V. M., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Direct Observations of Atmospheric Aerosol Nucleation,
Science,
339, 943–946, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1227385</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 47?><mixed-citation>Kurtén, T., Loukonen, V., Vehkamäki, H., and Kulmala, M.: Amines are likely to enhance neutral and ion-induced sulfuric acid-water nucleation in the atmosphere more effectively than ammonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4095–4103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4095-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-4095-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 46?><mixed-citation>Kürten, A.: New particle formation from sulfuric acid and ammonia: nucleation and growth model based on thermodynamics derived from CLOUD measurements for a wide range of conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5033–5050, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5033-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-5033-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 44?><mixed-citation>Kürten, A., Bianchi, F., Almeida, J., Kupiainen-Maatta, O., Dunne, E. M., Duplissy, J., Williamson, C., Barmet, P., Breitenlechner, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Gordon, H., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Ickes, L., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J., Kim, J., Kirkby, J., Kupc, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Makhmutov, V., Onnela, A., Ortega, I. K., Petaja, T., Praplan, A. P., Riccobono, F., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Schnitzhofer, R., Schobesberger, S., Smith, J. N., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tome, A., Trostl, J., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Wagner, P. E., Wimmer, D., Ye, P. L., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K., Kulmala, M., and Curtius, J.:
Experimental particle formation rates spanning tropospheric sulfuric acid and ammonia abundances, ion production rates, and temperatures,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
121, 12377–12400, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023908" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015jd023908</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 45?><mixed-citation>Kürten, A., Li, C., Bianchi, F., Curtius, J., Dias, A., Donahue, N. M., Duplissy, J., Flagan, R. C., Hakala, J., Jokinen, T., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Onnela, A., Rissanen, M. P., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Tröstl, J., Ye, P., and McMurry, P. H.: New particle formation in the sulfuric acid–dimethylamine–water system: reevaluation of CLOUD chamber measurements and comparison to an aerosol nucleation and growth model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 845–863, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-845-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-845-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 48?><mixed-citation>Lane, T. P. and Moncrieff, M. W.:
Stratospheric Gravity Waves Generated by Multiscale Tropical Convection,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
65, 2598–2614, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jas2601.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007jas2601.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Law, K. S., Fierli, F., Cairo, F., Schlager, H., Borrmann, S., Streibel,
M., Real, E., Kunkel, D., Schiller, C., Ravegnani, F., Ulanovsky, A., D'Amato, F., Viciani, S., and Volk, C. M.: Air mass origins influencing TTL chemical composition over West Africa during 2006 summer monsoon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10753–10770, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10753-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10753-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 49?><mixed-citation>Lee, K.-O., Dauhut, T., Chaboureau, J.-P., Khaykin, S., Krämer, M., and Rolf, C.: Convective hydration in the tropical tropopause layer during the StratoClim aircraft campaign: pathway of an observed hydration patch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11803–11820, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11803-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-11803-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 50?><mixed-citation>Lee, S. H., Wilson, J. C., Baumgardner, D., Herman, R. L., Weinstock, E. M., LaFleur, B. G., Kok, G., Anderson, B., Lawson, P., Baker, B., Strawa, A., Pittman, J. V., Reeves, J. M., and Bui, T. P.:
New particle formation observed in the tropical/subtropical cirrus clouds,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
109, D20209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd005033</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 51?><mixed-citation>Li, D., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Bian, J., Günther, G., Ploeger, F., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Bai, Z., Vömel, H., and Riese, M.: Dehydration and low ozone in the tropopause layer over the Asian monsoon caused by tropical cyclones: Lagrangian transport calculations using ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalysis data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4133–4152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4133-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4133-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 52?><mixed-citation>Mahnke, C., Weigel, R., Cairo, F., Vernier, J.-P., Afchine, A., Krämer, M., Mitev, V., Matthey, R., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Ploeger, F., Deshler, T., and Borrmann, S.: The ATAL within the 2017 Asian Monsoon Anticyclone: Microphysical aerosol properties derived from aircraft-borne in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1241" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2020-1241</ext-link>, in review, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 53?><mixed-citation>McKenna, D. S., Konopka, P., Grooss, J. U., Günther, G., Müller, R., Spang, R., Offermann, D., and Orsolini, Y.:
A new Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) – 1. Formulation of advection and mixing,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
107, 4309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd000114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000jd000114</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 54?><mixed-citation>Merikanto, J., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Pickering, S. J., and Carslaw, K. S.: Impact of nucleation on global CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8601–8616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 55?><mixed-citation>Metzger, A., Verheggen, B., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Riipinen, I., Kulmala, M., Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., and Baltensperger, U.:
Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol particle formation under atmospheric conditions,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
107, 6646–6651, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0911330107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 56?><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hudson, P. K., Matthew, B. M., Middlebrook, A. M., Peltier, R. E., Sullivan, A., Thomson, D. S., and Weber, R. J.:
Single-particle mass spectrometry of tropospheric aerosol particles,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
111, D23s32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007340" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007340</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 57?><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Froyd, K. D., Schwarz, J. P., and Wilson, J. C.:
Observations of the chemical composition of stratospheric aerosol particles,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
140, 1269–1278, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2213</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 58?><mixed-citation>Nieminen, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., Aalto, P. P., Arshinov, M., Asmi, E., Baltensperger, U., Beddows, D. C. S., Beukes, J. P., Collins, D., Ding, A., Harrison, R. M., Henzing, B., Hooda, R., Hu, M., Hőrrak, U., Kivekäs, N., Komsaare, K., Krejci, R., Kristensson, A., Laakso, L., Laaksonen, A., Leaitch, W. R., Lihavainen, H., Mihalopoulos, N., Németh, Z., Nie, W., O'Dowd, C., Salma, I., Sellegri, K., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tunved, P., Ulevicius, V., Vakkari, V., Vana, M., Wiedensohler, A., Wu, Z., Virtanen, A., and Kulmala, M.: Global analysis of continental boundary layer new particle formation based <?pagebreak page11720?>on long-term measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14737–14756, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14737-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14737-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 59?><mixed-citation>Pan, L. L., Honomichl, S. B., Kinnison, D. E., Abalos, M., Randel, W. J., Bergman, J. W., and Bian, J.: Transport of chemical tracers from the boundary layer to stratosphere associated with the dynamics of the Asian summer monsoon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 14159–14174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025616" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016jd025616</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 60?><mixed-citation>Park, M., Randel, W. J., Gettelman, A., Massie, S. T., and Jiang, J. H.:
Transport above the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone inferred from Aura Microwave Limb Sounder tracers,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
112, D16309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd008294</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 61?><mixed-citation>Park, M., Randel, W. J., Emmons, L. K., and Livesey, N. J.:
Transport pathways of carbon monoxide in the Asian summer monsoon diagnosed from Model of Ozone and Related Tracers (MOZART),
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, D08303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010621" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd010621</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 62?><mixed-citation>Piani, C., Durran, D., Alexander, M. J., and Holton, J. R.:
A Numerical Study of Three-Dimensional Gravity Waves Triggered by Deep Tropical Convection and Their Role in the Dynamics of the QBO,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
57, 3689–3702, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;3689:Ansotd&gt;2.0.Co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;3689:Ansotd&gt;2.0.Co;2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 63?><mixed-citation>Pisso, I. and Legras, B.: Turbulent vertical diffusivity in the sub-tropical stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 697–707, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-697-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-697-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 64?><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Günther, G., Konopka, P., Fueglistaler, S., Müller, R., Hoppe, C., Kunz, A., Spang, R., Grooss, J. U., and Riese, M.:
Horizontal water vapor transport in the lower stratosphere from subtropics to high latitudes during boreal summer,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 8111–8127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50636" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50636</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 65?><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Gottschling, C., Griessbach, S., Grooß, J.-U., Guenther, G., Konopka, P., Müller, R., Riese, M., Stroh, F., Tao, M., Ungermann, J., Vogel, B., and von Hobe, M.: A potential vorticity-based determination of the transport barrier in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13145–13159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 66?><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Walker, K., and Riese, M.: Quantifying pollution transport from the Asian monsoon anticyclone into the lower stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7055–7066, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7055-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7055-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 67?><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Diallo, M., Charlesworth, E., Konopka, P., Legras, B., Laube, J. C., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Engel, A., and Riese, M.: The stratospheric Brewer–Dobson circulation inferred from age of air in the ERA5 reanalysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8393–8412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8393-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-8393-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 68?><mixed-citation>Pommrich, R., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Konopka, P., Ploeger, F., Vogel, B., Tao, M., Hoppe, C. M., Günther, G., Spelten, N., Hoffmann, L., Pumphrey, H.-C., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Volk, C. M., Hoor, P., Schlager, H., and Riese, M.: Tropical troposphere to stratosphere transport of carbon monoxide and long-lived trace species in the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2895–2916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2895-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-2895-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 69?><mixed-citation>Randel, W. J. and Park, M.:
Deep convective influence on the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone and associated tracer variability observed with Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS),
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
111, D12314, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006490" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005jd006490</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>German Aerospace Center: HALO database, available at:  <uri>https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/mission/101</uri>, last access: 30 July 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 70?><mixed-citation>Riccobono, F., Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E., Dommen, J., Ortega, I. K., Rondo, L., Almeida, J., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Downard, A., Dunne, E. M., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Hansel, A., Junninen, H., Kajos, M., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A., Kürten, A., Kvashin, A. N., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Petaja, T., Praplan, A. P., Santos, F. D., Schallhart, S., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipila, M., Spracklen, D. V., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tome, A., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Wimmer, D., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Baltensperger, U.:
Oxidation Products of Biogenic Emissions Contribute to Nucleation of Atmospheric Particles,
Science,
344, 717–721, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243527" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1243527</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 71?><mixed-citation>Rollins, A. W., Thornberry, T. D., Watts, L. A., Yu, P., Rosenlof, K. H., Mills, M., Baumann, E., Giorgetta, F. R., Bui, T. V., Hopfner, M., Walker, K. A., Boone, C., Bernath, P. F., Colarco, P. R., Newman, P. A., Fahey, D. W., and Gao, R. S.:
The role of sulfur dioxide in stratospheric aerosol formation evaluated by using in situ measurements in the tropical lower stratosphere,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
44, 4280–4286, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl072754" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017gl072754</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 72?><mixed-citation>Rosen, J. M.:
The Boiling Point of Stratospheric Aerosols,
J. Appl. Meteorol.,
10, 1044–1046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1971)010&lt;1044:tbposa&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(1971)010&lt;1044:tbposa&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 73?><mixed-citation>Sahyoun, M., Freney, E., Brito, J., Duplissy, J., Gouhier, M., Colomb, A., Dupuy, R., Bourianne, T., Nowak, J. B., Yan, C., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Schwarzenboeck, A., Planche, C., and Sellegri, K.:
Evidence of New Particle Formation Within Etna and Stromboli Volcanic Plumes and Its Parameterization From Airborne In Situ Measurements,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
124, 5650–5668, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd028882" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018jd028882</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 74?><mixed-citation>Santee, M. L., Manney, G. L., Livesey, N. J., Schwartz, M. J., Neu, J. L., and Read, W. G.:
A comprehensive overview of the climatological composition of the Asian summermonsoon anticyclone based on 10 years of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder measurements,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
122, 5491–5514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026408" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016jd026408</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 75?><mixed-citation>Schneider, J., Weigel, R., Klimach, T., Dragoneas, A., Appel, O., Hünig, A., Molleker, S., Köllner, F., Clemen, H.-C., Eppers, O., Hoppe, P., Hoor, P., Mahnke, C., Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Grooß, J.-U., Zahn, A., Obersteiner, F., Ravegnani, F., Ulanovsky, A., Schlager, H., Scheibe, M., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., Nowak, J. B., Zöger, M., and Borrmann, S.: Aircraft-based observation of meteoric material in lower-stratospheric aerosol particles between 15 and 68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1029" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 989–1013, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-989-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-989-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 76?><mixed-citation>Sellegri, K., Rose, C., Marinoni, A., Lupi, A., Wiedensohler, A., Andrade, M., Bonasoni, P., and Laj, P.:
New Particle Formation: A Review of Ground-Based Observations at Mountain Research Stations,
Atmosphere-Basel,
10, 493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/Atmos10090493" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/Atmos10090493</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 77?><mixed-citation>
Sokolov, L. and Lepuchov, B.: Protocol of interaction between Unit for Connection with Scientific Equipment (UCSE) and on-boa<?pagebreak page11721?>rd scientific equipment of Geophysica aircraft (Second edition), Myasishchev Design Bureau (MDB), Moscow, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 78?><mixed-citation>Song, I.-S., Chun, H.-Y., and Lane, T. P.:
Generation Mechanisms of Convectively Forced Internal Gravity Waves and Their Propagation to the Stratosphere,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
60, 1960–1980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060&lt;1960:Gmocfi&gt;2.0.Co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060&lt;1960:Gmocfi&gt;2.0.Co;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 79?><mixed-citation>Stenke, A., Schraner, M., Rozanov, E., Egorova, T., Luo, B., and Peter, T.: The SOCOL version 3.0 chemistry–climate model: description, evaluation, and implications from an advanced transport algorithm, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1407–1427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1407-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-1407-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 80?><mixed-citation>Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 81?><mixed-citation>Stolzenburg, D., Simon, M., Ranjithkumar, A., Kürten, A., Lehtipalo, K., Gordon, H., Ehrhart, S., Finkenzeller, H., Pichelstorfer, L., Nieminen, T., He, X.-C., Brilke, S., Xiao, M., Amorim, A., Baalbaki, R., Baccarini, A., Beck, L., Bräkling, S., Caudillo Murillo, L., Chen, D., Chu, B., Dada, L., Dias, A., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., El Haddad, I., Fischer, L., Gonzalez Carracedo, L., Heinritzi, M., Kim, C., Koenig, T. K., Kong, W., Lamkaddam, H., Lee, C. P., Leiminger, M., Li, Z., Makhmutov, V., Manninen, H. E., Marie, G., Marten, R., Müller, T., Nie, W., Partoll, E., Petäjä, T., Pfeifer, J., Philippov, M., Rissanen, M. P., Rörup, B., Schobesberger, S., Schuchmann, S., Shen, J., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tauber, C., Tham, Y. J., Tomé, A., Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Wagner, A. C., Wang, M., Wang, Y., Weber, S. K., Wimmer, D., Wlasits, P. J., Wu, Y., Ye, Q., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Flagan, R. C., Hansel, A., Kulmala, M., Lelieveld, J., Volkamer, R., Kirkby, J., and Winkler, P. M.: Enhanced growth rate of atmospheric particles from sulfuric acid, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7359–7372, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7359-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-7359-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 83?><mixed-citation>Tang, M. J., Cox, R. A., and Kalberer, M.: Compilation and evaluation of gas phase diffusion coefficients of reactive trace gases in the atmosphere: volume 1. Inorganic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9233–9247, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9233-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-9233-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 84?><mixed-citation>Thomason, L. W. and Peter, T. (Eds.): Assessment of Stratospheric Aerosol Properties (ASAP), SPARC Report No. 4, World Climate Research Programme WCRP –124, WMO/TD No. 1295, SPARC office, available at: <uri>https://www.sparc-climate.org/publications/sparc-reports/sparc-report-no-4/</uri>
(last access: 30 July 2021), 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 85?><mixed-citation>Thomason, L. W. and Vernier, J.-P.: Improved SAGE II cloud/aerosol categorization and observations of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer: 1989–2005, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4605–4616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4605-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4605-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 86?><mixed-citation>Tissier, A.-S. and Legras, B.: Convective sources of trajectories traversing the tropical tropopause layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3383–3398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3383-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3383-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 87?><mixed-citation>Tzella, A. and Legras, B.: A Lagrangian view of convective sources for transport of air across the Tropical Tropopause Layer: distribution, times and the radiative influence of clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12517–12534, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12517-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12517-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 88?><mixed-citation>Venzac, H., Sellegri, K., Laj, P., Villani, P., Bonasoni, P., Marinoni, A., Cristofanelli, P., Calzolari, F., Fuzzi, S., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Vuillermoz, E., and Verza, G. P.:
High frequency new particle formation in the Himalayas,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
105, 15666–15671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801355105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0801355105</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 90?><mixed-citation>Vernier, J. P., Thomason, L. W., and Kar, J.:
CALIPSO detection of an Asian tropopause aerosol layer,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
38, L07804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl046614" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010gl046614</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 91?><mixed-citation>Vernier, J. P., Thomason, L. W., Pommereau, J. P., Bourassa, A., Pelon, J., Garnier, A., Hauchecorne, A., Blanot, L., Trepte, C., Degenstein, D., and Vargas, F.:
Major influence of tropical volcanic eruptions on the stratospheric aerosol layer during the last decade,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
38, L12807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl047563" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011gl047563</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 92?><mixed-citation>Vernier, J. P., Fairlie, T. D., Natarajan, M., Wienhold, F. G., Bian, J., Martinsson, B. G., Crumeyrolle, S., Thomason, L. W., and Bedka, K. M.:
Increase in upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric aerosol levels and its potential connection with Asian pollution,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
120, 1608–1619, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd022372</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 89?><mixed-citation>Vernier, J.-P., Fairlie, T. D., Deshler, T., Ratnam, M. V., Gadhavi, H., Kumar, B. S., Natarajan, M., Pandit, A. K., Raj, S. T. A., Kumar, A. H., Jayaraman, A., Singh, A. K., Rastogi, N., Sinha, P. R., Kumar, S., Tiwari, S., Wegner, T., Baker, N., Vignelles, D., Stenchikov, G., Shevchenko, I., Smith, J., Bedka, K., Kesarkar, A., Singh, V., Bhate, J., Ravikiran, V., Rao, M. D., Ravindrababu, S., Patel, A., Vernier, H., Wienhold, F. G., Liu, H., Knepp, T. N., Thomason, L., Crawford, J., Ziemba, L., Moore, J., Crumeyrolle, S., Williamson, M., Berthet, G., Jégou, F., and Renard, J.-B.:
BATAL: The Balloon Measurement Campaigns of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
99, 955–973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-17-0014.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/bams-d-17-0014.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 93?><mixed-citation>Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Mazzinghi, P., Castagnoli, F., Toci, G., and Werle, P.:
A cryogenically operated laser diode spectrometer for airborne measurement of stratospheric trace gases,
Appl. Phys. B,
90, 581–592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-007-2885-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00340-007-2885-2</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 94?><mixed-citation>Viciani, S., Montori, A., Chiarugi, A., and D'Amato, F.:
A Portable Quantum Cascade Laser Spectrometer for Atmospheric Measurements of Carbon Monoxide,
Sensors,
18, 2380, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072380" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/s18072380</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 95?><mixed-citation>Vincent, R. A. and Alexander, M. J.:
Gravity waves in the tropical lower stratosphere: An observational study of seasonal and interannual variability,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
105, 17971–17982, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900196" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000jd900196</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 96?><mixed-citation>Vogel, B., Günther, G., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Hoor, P., Krämer, M., Müller, S., Zahn, A., and Riese, M.: Fast transport from Southeast Asia boundary layer sources to northern Europe: rapid uplift in typhoons and eastward eddy shedding of the Asian monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12745–12762, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12745-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12745-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 97?><mixed-citation>Vogel, B., Müller, R., Günther, G., Spang, R., Hanumanthu, S., Li, D., Riese, M., and Stiller, G. P.: Lagrangian simulations of the transport of young air masses to the top of the Asian monsoon anticyclone and into the tropical pipe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6007–6034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6007-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6007-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 98?><mixed-citation>von der Weiden, S.-L., Drewnick, F., and Borrmann, S.: Particle Loss Calculator – a new software tool for the assessment of t<?pagebreak page11722?>he performance of aerosol inlet systems, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 479–494, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2-479-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 99?><mixed-citation>von Hobe, M., Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Kloss, C., Ulanowski, A., Yushkov, V., Ravegnani, F., Volk, C. M., Pan, L. L., Honomichl, S. B., Tilmes, S., Kinnison, D. E., Garcia, R. R., and Wright, J. S.: Upward transport into and within the Asian monsoon anticyclone as inferred from StratoClim trace gas observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1267–1285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 100?><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Kong, W., Marten, R., He, X.-C., Chen, D., Pfeifer, J., Heitto, A., Kontkanen, J., Dada, L., Kürten, A., Yli-Juuti, T., Manninen, H. E., Amanatidis, S., Amorim, A., Baalbaki, R., Baccarini, A., Bell, D. M., Bertozzi, B., Bräkling, S., Brilke, S., Murillo, L. C., Chiu, R., Chu, B., De Menezes, L.-P., Duplissy, J., Finkenzeller, H., Carracedo, L. G., Granzin, M., Guida, R., Hansel, A., Hofbauer, V., Krechmer, J., Lehtipalo, K., Lamkaddam, H., Lampimäki, M., Lee, C. P., Makhmutov, V., Marie, G., Mathot, S., Mauldin, R. L., Mentler, B., Müller, T., Onnela, A., Partoll, E., Petäjä, T., Philippov, M., Pospisilova, V., Ranjithkumar, A., Rissanen, M., Rörup, B., Scholz, W., Shen, J., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stolzenburg, D., Tham, Y. J., Tomé, A., Wagner, A. C., Wang, D. S., Wang, Y., Weber, S. K., Winkler, P. M., Wlasits, P. J., Wu, Y., Xiao, M., Ye, Q., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Zhou, X., Volkamer, R., Riipinen, I., Dommen, J., Curtius, J., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Kirkby, J., Seinfeld, J. H., El-Haddad, I., Flagan, R. C., and Donahue, N. M.:
Rapid growth of new atmospheric particles by nitric acid and ammonia condensation,
Nature,
581, 184–189, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2270-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-020-2270-4</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 101?><mixed-citation>Wehner, B., Werner, F., Ditas, F., Shaw, R. A., Kulmala, M., and Siebert, H.: Observations of new particle formation in enhanced UV irradiance zones near cumulus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11701–11711, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11701-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11701-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 102?><mixed-citation>Weigel, R., Hermann, M., Curtius, J., Voigt, C., Walter, S., Böttger, T., Lepukhov, B., Belyaev, G., and Borrmann, S.: Experimental characterization of the COndensation PArticle counting System for high altitude aircraft-borne application, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 243–258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-243-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2-243-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 103?><mixed-citation>Weigel, R., Borrmann, S., Kazil, J., Minikin, A., Stohl, A., Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Kunkel, D., de Reus, M., Frey, W., Lovejoy, E. R., Volk, C. M., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Schiller, C., Peter, T., Schlager, H., Cairo, F., Law, K. S., Shur, G. N., Belyaev, G. V., and Curtius, J.: In situ observations of new particle formation in the tropical upper troposphere: the role of clouds and the nucleation mechanism, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9983–10010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9983-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9983-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 104?><mixed-citation>Weigel, R., Volk, C. M., Kandler, K., Hösen, E., Günther, G., Vogel, B., Grooß, J.-U., Khaykin, S., Belyaev, G. V., and Borrmann, S.: Enhancements of the refractory submicron aerosol fraction in the Arctic polar vortex: feature or exception?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12319–12342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12319-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12319-2014</ext-link>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 105?><mixed-citation>Weigel, R., Mahnke, C., Baumgartner, M., Krämer, M., Spichtinger, P., Spelten, N., Afchine, A., Rolf, C., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Tost, H., and Borrmann, S.: New particle formation inside ice clouds: In-situ observations in the tropical tropopause layer of the 2017 Asian Monsoon Anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1285" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2020-1285</ext-link>, in review, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 106?><mixed-citation>Weigelt, A., Hermann, M., van Velthoven, P. F. J., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Schlaf, G., Zahn, A., and Wiedensohler, A.:
Influence of clouds on aerosol particle number concentrations in the upper troposphere,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, D01204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009805" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd009805</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><?label 107?><mixed-citation>Williamson, C., Kupc, A., Wilson, J., Gesler, D. W., Reeves, J. M., Erdesz, F., McLaughlin, R., and Brock, C. A.: Fast time response measurements of particle size distributions in the 3–60 nm size range with the nucleation mode aerosol size spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3491–3509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3491-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-3491-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><?label 108?><mixed-citation>Williamson, C. J., Kupc, A., Axisa, D., Bilsback, K. R., Bui, T., Campuzano-Jost, P., Dollner, M., Froyd, K. D., Hodshire, A. L., Jimenez, J. L., Kodros, J. K., Luo, G., Murphy, D. M., Nault, B. A., Ray, E. A., Weinzierl, B., Wilson, J. C., Yu, F., Yu, P., Pierce, J. R., and Brock, C. A.:
A large source of cloud condensation nuclei from new particle formation in the tropics,
Nature,
574, 399–403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1638-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-019-1638-9</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><?label 109?><mixed-citation>
WMO:
Meteorology – A three-dimensional science,
WMO Bull.,
134–138, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><?label 110?><mixed-citation>
WMO:
International Meteorological Tables, WMO-No.188.TP97,
edited by: Letestu, S.,
Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><?label 111?><mixed-citation>Wright, C. J. and Gille, J. C.: HIRDLS observations of gravity wave momentum fluxes over the monsoon regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D12103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015725" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011jd015725</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><?label 112?><mixed-citation>Yu, F. Q., Luo, G., Bates, T. S., Anderson, B., Clarke, A., Kapustin, V., Yantosca, R. M., Wang, Y. X., and Wu, S. L.:
Spatial distributions of particle number concentrations in the global troposphere: Simulations, observations, and implications for nucleation mechanisms,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
115, D17205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013473" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd013473</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><?label 113?><mixed-citation>Yu, P., Rosenlof, K. H., Liu, S., Telg, H., Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Portmann, R. W., Bai, Z., Ray, E. A., Duan, Y., Pan, L. L., Toon, O. B., Bian, J., and Gao, R.-S.:
Efficient transport of tropospheric aerosol into the stratosphere via the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci.,
114, 6972–6977, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701170114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1701170114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><?label 114?><mixed-citation>Yu, P. F., Toon, O. B., Neely, R. R., Martinsson, B. G., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.:
Composition and physical properties of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer and the North American Tropospheric Aerosol Layer,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
42, 2540–2546, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063181" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015gl063181</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><?label 115?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., McMurry, P. H., Yu, F. Q., and Jacobson, M. Z.:
A comparative study of nucleation parameterizations: 1. Examination and evaluation of the formulations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
115, D20212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014150" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd014150</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>In situ observation of new particle formation (NPF) in  the tropical tropopause layer of the 2017 Asian monsoon  anticyclone – Part 1: Summary of StratoClim results</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>During the monsoon season of the year 2017 the airborne StratoClim mission took place in Kathmandu, Nepal, with eight mission flights of the M-55
<i>Geophysica</i> in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) of the Asian monsoon anticyclone (AMA) over northern India, Nepal, and
Bangladesh. More than 100 events of new particle formation (NPF) were observed. In total, more than 2&thinsp;h of flight time was spent under
NPF conditions as indicated by the abundant presence of nucleation-mode aerosols, i.e. with particle diameters <i>d</i><sub>p</sub> smaller than
15&thinsp;nm, which were detected in situ by means of condensation nuclei counting techniques. Mixing ratios of nucleation-mode particles
(<i>n</i><sub>nm</sub>) of up to  ∼ &thinsp;50&thinsp;000&thinsp;mg<sup>−1</sup> were measured at heights of 15–16&thinsp;km (<i>θ</i>&thinsp; ≈ &thinsp;370&thinsp;K). NPF
was most frequently observed at  ∼ &thinsp;12–16&thinsp;km altitude (<i>θ</i>&thinsp; ≈ &thinsp;355–380&thinsp;K) and mainly below the tropopause. Resulting <i>n</i><sub>nm</sub> remained elevated ( ∼ &thinsp;300–2000&thinsp;mg<sup>−1</sup>) up to altitudes of  ∼ &thinsp;17.5&thinsp;km (<i>θ</i>&thinsp; ≈ &thinsp;400&thinsp;K), while under NPF conditions the fraction (<i>f</i>) of sub-micrometre-sized non-volatile residues (<i>d</i><sub>p</sub>&thinsp; &gt; &thinsp;10&thinsp;nm) remained below 50&thinsp;%. At  ∼ &thinsp;12–14&thinsp;km (<i>θ</i>&thinsp; ≈ &thinsp;355–365&thinsp;K) the minimum of <i>f</i> ( &lt; &thinsp;15&thinsp;%) was found, and underneath, the median <i>f</i> generally remains below 25&thinsp;%. The persistence of particles at nucleation-mode sizes is limited to a few hours, mainly due to coagulation, as demonstrated by a numerical simulation. The frequency of NPF events observed during StratoClim 2017 underlines the importance of the AMA as a source region for UTLS aerosols and for the formation and maintenance of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer (ATAL). The observed abundance of NPF-produced nucleation-mode particles within the AMA is not unambiguously attributable to (a) specific source regions in the boundary layer (according to backward trajectory analyses), or (b) the direct supply with precursor material by convective updraught (from correlations of NPF with carbon monoxide), or (c) the recent release of NPF-capable material from the convective outflow (according to air mass transport times in the tropical tropopause layer, TTL). Temperature anomalies with Δ<i>T</i> of 2&thinsp;K (peak-to-peak amplitude), as observed at a horizontal wavelength of  ∼ &thinsp;70–100&thinsp;km during a level flight of several hours, match with NPF detections and represent an additional mechanism for local increases in supersaturation of the NPF precursors. Effective precursor supply and widely distributed temperature anomalies within the AMA can explain the higher frequency of intense NPF observed during StratoClim 2017 than all previous NPF detections with COPAS (COndensation PArticle counting
System) at TTL levels over Brazil, northern Australia, or West Africa.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alexander, M. J., Geller, M., McLandress, C., Polavarapu, S., Preusse, P., Sassi, F., Sato, K., Eckermann, S., Ern, M., Hertzog, A., Kawatani, Y., Pulido, M., Shaw, T. A., Sigmond, M., Vincent, R., and Watanabe, S.:
Recent developments in gravity-wave effects in climate models and the global distribution of gravity-wave momentum flux from observations and models,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
136, 1103–1124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.637" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.637</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O., Afchine, A., Albrecht, R., Holanda, B. A., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Borrmann, S., Cecchini, M. A., Costa, A., Dollner, M., Fütterer, D., Järvinen, E., Jurkat, T., Klimach, T., Konemann, T., Knote, C., Krämer, M., Krisna, T., Machado, L. A. T., Mertes, S., Minikin, A., Pöhlker, C., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöschl, U., Rosenfeld, D., Sauer, D., Schlager, H., Schnaiter, M., Schneider, J., Schulz, C., Spanu, A., Sperling, V. B., Voigt, C., Walser, A., Wang, J., Weinzierl, B., Wendisch, M., and Ziereis, H.: Aerosol characteristics and particle production in the upper troposphere over the Amazon Basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 921–961, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-921-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-921-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Barth, M. C., Stuart, A. L., and Skamarock, W. C.:
Numerical simulations of the July 10, 1996, Stratospheric-Tropospheric Experiment: Radiation, Aerosols, and Ozone (STERAO)-Deep Convection experiment storm: Redistribution of soluble tracers,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
106, 12381–12400, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd900139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd900139</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Baumgartner, M., Weigel, R., Harvey, A. H., Plöger, F., Achatz, U., and Spichtinger, P.: Reappraising the appropriate calculation of a common meteorological quantity: potential temperature, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15585–15616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15585-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15585-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bergman, J. W., Jensen, E. J., Pfister, L., and Yang, Q.:
Seasonal differences of vertical-transport efficiency in the tropical tropopause layer: On the interplay between tropical deep convection, large-scale vertical ascent, and horizontal circulationes,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
117, D05302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016992" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016992</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bergman, J. W., Fierli, F., Jensen, E. J., Honomichl, S., and Pan, L. L.:
Boundary layer sources for the Asian anticyclone: Regional contributions to a vertical conduit,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 2560–2575, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50142" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50142</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bianchi, F., Junninen, H., Bigi, A., Sinclair, V. A., Dada, L., Hoyle, C. R., Zha, Q., Yao, L., Ahonen, L. R., Bonasoni, P., Buenrostro Mazon, S., Hutterli, M., Laj, P., Lehtipalo, K., Kangasluoma, J., Kerminen, V. M., Kontkanen, J., Marinoni, A., Mirme, S., Molteni, U., Petäjä, T., Riva, M., Rose, C., Sellegri, K., Yan, C., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Baltensperger, U., and Dommen, J.:
Biogenic particles formed in the Himalaya as an important source of free tropospheric aerosols,
Nat. Geosci.,
14, 4–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-00661-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-00661-5</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Borrmann, S., Kunkel, D., Weigel, R., Minikin, A., Deshler, T., Wilson, J. C., Curtius, J., Volk, C. M., Homan, C. D., Ulanovsky, A., Ravegnani, F., Viciani, S., Shur, G. N., Belyaev, G. V., Law, K. S., and Cairo, F.: Aerosols in the tropical and subtropical UT/LS: in-situ measurements of submicron particle abundance and volatility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5573–5592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5573-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5573-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Brock, C. A., Hamill, P., Wilson, J. C., Jonsson, H. H., and Chan, K. R.:
Particle Formation in the Upper Tropical Troposphere: A Source of Nuclei for the Stratospheric Aerosol,
Science,
270, 1650–1653, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2887916" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/2887916</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Brock, C. A., Schröder, F., Kärcher, B., Petzold, A., Busen, R., and Fiebig, M.:
Ultrafine particle size distributions measured in aircraft exhaust plumes,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
105, 26555–26567, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900360" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900360</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Brunamonti, S., Jorge, T., Oelsner, P., Hanumanthu, S., Singh, B. B., Kumar, K. R., Sonbawne, S., Meier, S., Singh, D., Wienhold, F. G., Luo, B. P., Boettcher, M., Poltera, Y., Jauhiainen, H., Kayastha, R., Karmacharya, J., Dirksen, R., Naja, M., Rex, M., Fadnavis, S., and Peter, T.: Balloon-borne measurements of temperature, water vapor, ozone and aerosol backscatter on the southern slopes of the Himalayas during StratoClim 2016–2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15937–15957, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bucci, S., Legras, B., Sellitto, P., D'Amato, F., Viciani, S., Montori, A., Chiarugi, A., Ravegnani, F., Ulanovsky, A., Cairo, F., and Stroh, F.: Deep-convective influence on the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere composition in the Asian monsoon anticyclone region: 2017 StratoClim campaign results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12193–12210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12193-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12193-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Campbell, P. and Deshler, T.:
Condensation nuclei measurements in the midlatitude (1982–2012) and Antarctic (1986–2010) stratosphere between 20 and 35&thinsp;km,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
119, 2013JD019710, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd019710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd019710</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chirkov, M., Stiller, G. P., Laeng, A., Kellmann, S., von Clarmann, T., Boone, C. D., Elkins, J. W., Engel, A., Glatthor, N., Grabowski, U., Harth, C. M., Kiefer, M., Kolonjari, F., Krummel, P. B., Linden, A., Lunder, C. R., Miller, B. R., Montzka, S. A., Mühle, J., O'Doherty, S., Orphal, J., Prinn, R. G., Toon, G., Vollmer, M. K., Walker, K. A., Weiss, R. F., Wiegele, A., and Young, D.: Global HCFC-22 measurements with MIPAS: retrieval, validation, global distribution and its evolution over 2005–2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3345–3368, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3345-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3345-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chun, H.-Y. and Kim, Y.-H.: Secondary waves generated by breaking of convective gravity waves in the mesosphere and their influence in the wave momentum flux, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D23107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009792" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009792</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Crumeyrolle, S., Manninen, H. E., Sellegri, K., Roberts, G., Gomes, L., Kulmala, M., Weigel, R., Laj, P., and Schwarzenboeck, A.: New particle formation events measured on board the ATR-42 aircraft during the EUCAARI campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6721–6735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6721-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6721-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Crutzen, P. J. and Lawrence, M. G.:
The impact of precipitation scavenging on the transport of trace gases: A 3-dimensional model sensitivity study,
J. Atmos. Chem.,
37, 81–112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006322926426" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006322926426</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Curtius, J., Weigel, R., Vössing, H.-J., Wernli, H., Werner, A., Volk, C.-M., Konopka, P., Krebsbach, M., Schiller, C., Roiger, A., Schlager, H., Dreiling, V., and Borrmann, S.: Observations of meteoric material and implications for aerosol nucleation in the winter Arctic lower stratosphere derived from in situ particle measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3053–3069, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3053-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3053-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J. J., Park, B. K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J. N., and Vitart, F.:
The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
137, 553–597, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
de Reus, M., Borrmann, S., Bansemer, A., Heymsfield, A. J., Weigel, R., Schiller, C., Mitev, V., Frey, W., Kunkel, D., Kürten, A., Curtius, J., Sitnikov, N. M., Ulanovsky, A., and Ravegnani, F.: Evidence for ice particles in the tropical stratosphere from in-situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6775–6792, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6775-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6775-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Dunne, E. M., Gordon, H., Kürten, A., Almeida, J., Duplissy, J., Williamson, C., Ortega, I. K., Pringle, K. J., Adamov, A., Baltensperger, U., Barmet, P., Benduhn, F., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Clarke, A., Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Kupc, A., Lawler, M. J., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mann, G., Mathot, S., Merikanto, J., Miettinen, P., Nenes, A., Onnela, A., Rap, A., Reddington, C. L. S., Riccobono, F., Richards, N. A. D., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Sengupta, K., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Smith, J. N., Stozkhov, Y., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J., Wagner, P. E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., and Carslaw, K. S.:
Global atmospheric particle formation from CERN CLOUD measurements,
Science,
354, 1119–1124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2649" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2649</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Ekman, A. M. L., Wang, C., Strom, J., and Krejci, R.:
Explicit simulation of aerosol physics in a cloud-resolving model: Aerosol transport and processing in the free troposphere,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
63, 682–696, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/Jas3645.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/Jas3645.1</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Ern, M. and Preusse, P.: Gravity wave momentum flux spectra observed from satellite in the summertime subtropics: Implications for global modeling,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L15810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl052659" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl052659</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Frey, W., Borrmann, S., Kunkel, D., Weigel, R., de Reus, M., Schlager, H., Roiger, A., Voigt, C., Hoor, P., Curtius, J., Krämer, M., Schiller, C., Volk, C. M., Homan, C. D., Fierli, F., Di Donfrancesco, G., Ulanovsky, A., Ravegnani, F., Sitnikov, N. M., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Shur, G. N., Belyaev, G. V., Law, K. S., and Cairo, F.: In situ measurements of tropical cloud properties in the West African Monsoon: upper tropospheric ice clouds, Mesoscale Convective System outflow, and subvisual cirrus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5569–5590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5569-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5569-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Lawson, P., Baumgardner, D., and Herman, R. L.: Aerosols that form subvisible cirrus at the tropical tropopause, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 209–218, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-209-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-209-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Fujiwara, M., Sakai, T., Nagai, T., Shiraishi, K., Inai, Y., Khaykin, S., Xi, H., Shibata, T., Shiotani, M., and Pan, L. L.: Lower-stratospheric aerosol measurements in eastward-shedding vortices over Japan from the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone during the summer of 2018, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3073–3090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3073-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3073-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Garny, H. and Randel, W. J.: Transport pathways from the Asian monsoon anticyclone to the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2703–2718, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2703-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2703-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
German Aerospace Center: HALO database, available at:  <a href="https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/mission/101" target="_blank"/>, last access: 30 July 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Glatthor, N., Hopfner, M., Baker, I. T., Berry, J., Campbell, J. E., Kawa, S. R., Krysztofiak, G., Leyser, A., Sinnhuber, B. M., Stiller, G. P., Stinecipher, J., and von Clarmann, T.:
Tropical sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide observed from space,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
42, 10082–10090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl066293" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl066293</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hanumanthu, S., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Brunamonti, S., Fadnavis, S., Li, D., Ölsner, P., Naja, M., Singh, B. B., Kumar, K. R., Sonbawne, S., Jauhiainen, H., Vömel, H., Luo, B., Jorge, T., Wienhold, F. G., Dirkson, R., and Peter, T.: Strong day-to-day variability of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer (ATAL) in August 2016 at the Himalayan foothills, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14273–14302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14273-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14273-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
He, Q., Ma, J., Zheng, X., Yan, X., Vömel, H., Wienhold, F. G., Gao, W., Liu, D., Shi, G., and Cheng, T.: Observational evidence of particle hygroscopic growth in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) over the Tibetan Plateau, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8399–8406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8399-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8399-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hermann, M., Heintzenberg, J., Wiedensohler, A., Zahn, A., Heinrich, G., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.:
Meridional distributions of aerosol particle number concentrations in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere obtained by Civil Aircraft for Regular Investigation of the Atmosphere Based on an Instrument Container (CARIBIC) flights,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
108, 4114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001077</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hersbach, H. and Dee, D. P.:
ERA5 reanalysis is in production,
ECMWF Newsletter,
147, 7, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, L., Günther, G., Li, D., Stein, O., Wu, X., Griessbach, S., Heng, Y., Konopka, P., Müller, R., Vogel, B., and Wright, J. S.: From ERA-Interim to ERA5: the considerable impact of ECMWF's next-generation reanalysis on Lagrangian transport simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3097–3124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3097-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3097-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Höpfner, M., Ungermann, J., Borrmann, S., Wagner, R., Spang, R., Riese, M., Stiller, G., Appel, O., Batenburg, A. M., Bucci, S., Cairo, F., Dragoneas, A., Friedl-Vallon, F., Hünig, A., Johansson, S., Krasauskas, L., Legras, B., Leisner, T., Mahnke, C., Möhler, O., Molleker, S., Müller, R., Neubert, T., Orphal, J., Preusse, P., Rex, M., Saathoff, H., Stroh, F., Weigel, R., and Wohltmann, I.:
Ammonium nitrate particles formed in upper troposphere from ground ammonia sources during Asian monsoons,
Nat. Geosci.,
12, 608–612, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0385-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0385-8</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.:
Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling,
Cambridge University Press, New York, 813 pp., 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Jost, A., Szakáll, M., Diehl, K., Mitra, S. K., and Borrmann, S.: Chemistry of riming: the retention of organic and inorganic atmospheric trace constituents, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9717–9732, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9717-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9717-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., Manninen, H. E., Paasonen, P., Nieminen, T., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H., Ehn, M., Gagné, S., Laakso, L., Riipinen, I., Vehkamäki, H., Kurten, T., Ortega, I. K., Dal Maso, M., Brus, D., Hyvärinen, A., Lihavainen, H., Leppä, J., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Hőrrak, U., Berndt, T., Stratmann, F., Birmili, W., Wiedensohler, A., Metzger, A., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Mentel, T. F., Wildt, J., Winkler, P. M., Wagner, P. E., Petzold, A., Minikin, A., Plass-Dülmer, C., Pöschl, U., Laaksonen, A., and Kulmala, M.: Atmospheric nucleation: highlights of the EUCAARI project and future directions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10829–10848, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10829-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10829-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kerminen, V. M., Chen, X. M., Vakkari, V., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Bianchi, F.:
Atmospheric new particle formation and growth: review of field observations,
Environ. Res. Lett.,
13, 103003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/Aadf3c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/Aadf3c</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkby, J., Curtius, J., Almeida, J., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Franchin, A., Gagne, S., Ickes, L., Kurten, A., Kupc, A., Metzger, A., Riccobono, F., Rondo, L., Schobesberger, S., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Wimmer, D., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Downard, A., Ehn, M., Flagan, R. C., Haider, S., Hansel, A., Hauser, D., Jud, W., Junninen, H., Kreissl, F., Kvashin, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Lima, J., Lovejoy, E. R., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Mikkila, J., Minginette, P., Mogo, S., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Pereira, P., Petaja, T., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipila, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tome, A., Vanhanen, J., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Walther, H., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Winkler, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Kulmala, M.: Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia and galactic cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Nature, 476, 429–433, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Konopka, P., Ploeger, F. and Müller, R.: Entropy-Based and Static Stability-Based Lagrangian Model Grids, in: Lagrangian Modeling of the Atmosphere, edited by: Lin, J., Brunner, D., Gerbig, C., Stohl, A., Luhar, A., and Webley, P., 99–109, available at: <a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2012GM001253" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 July 2021), 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T., Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A., Schwarz, J. P., Weigel, R., Fueglistaler, S., Prata, F. J., Vernier, J.-P., Schlager, H., Barnes, J. E., Antu na-Marrero, J.-C., Fairlie, D., Palm, M., Mahieu, E., Notholt, J., Rex, M., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Bourassa, A., Plane, J. M. C., Klocke, D., Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., Trickl, T., Neely, R., James, A. D., Rieger, L., Wilson, J. C., and Meland, B.: Stratospheric aerosol – Observations, processes, and impact on climate, Rev. Geophys., 54, 278–335, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015rg000511" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015rg000511</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Vehkamaki, H., Petaja, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A., Kerminen, V. M., Birmili, W., and McMurry, P. H.:
Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations,
J. Aerosol. Sci.,
35, 143–176, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Petaja, T., Sipila, M., Schobesberger, S., Rantala, P., Franchin, A., Jokinen, T., Jarvinen, E., Aijala, M., Kangasluoma, J., Hakala, J., Aalto, P. P., Paasonen, P., Mikkila, J., Vanhanen, J., Aalto, J., Hakola, H., Makkonen, U., Ruuskanen, T., Mauldin, R. L., Duplissy, J., Vehkamaki, H., Back, J., Kortelainen, A., Riipinen, I., Kurten, T., Johnston, M. V., Smith, J. N., Ehn, M., Mentel, T. F., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kerminen, V. M., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Direct Observations of Atmospheric Aerosol Nucleation,
Science,
339, 943–946, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227385</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Kurtén, T., Loukonen, V., Vehkamäki, H., and Kulmala, M.: Amines are likely to enhance neutral and ion-induced sulfuric acid-water nucleation in the atmosphere more effectively than ammonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4095–4103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4095-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4095-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Kürten, A.: New particle formation from sulfuric acid and ammonia: nucleation and growth model based on thermodynamics derived from CLOUD measurements for a wide range of conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5033–5050, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5033-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5033-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kürten, A., Bianchi, F., Almeida, J., Kupiainen-Maatta, O., Dunne, E. M., Duplissy, J., Williamson, C., Barmet, P., Breitenlechner, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Gordon, H., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Ickes, L., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J., Kim, J., Kirkby, J., Kupc, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Makhmutov, V., Onnela, A., Ortega, I. K., Petaja, T., Praplan, A. P., Riccobono, F., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Schnitzhofer, R., Schobesberger, S., Smith, J. N., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tome, A., Trostl, J., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Wagner, P. E., Wimmer, D., Ye, P. L., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K., Kulmala, M., and Curtius, J.:
Experimental particle formation rates spanning tropospheric sulfuric acid and ammonia abundances, ion production rates, and temperatures,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
121, 12377–12400, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023908" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023908</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Kürten, A., Li, C., Bianchi, F., Curtius, J., Dias, A., Donahue, N. M., Duplissy, J., Flagan, R. C., Hakala, J., Jokinen, T., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Onnela, A., Rissanen, M. P., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Tröstl, J., Ye, P., and McMurry, P. H.: New particle formation in the sulfuric acid–dimethylamine–water system: reevaluation of CLOUD chamber measurements and comparison to an aerosol nucleation and growth model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 845–863, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-845-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-845-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Lane, T. P. and Moncrieff, M. W.:
Stratospheric Gravity Waves Generated by Multiscale Tropical Convection,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
65, 2598–2614, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jas2601.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jas2601.1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Law, K. S., Fierli, F., Cairo, F., Schlager, H., Borrmann, S., Streibel,
M., Real, E., Kunkel, D., Schiller, C., Ravegnani, F., Ulanovsky, A., D'Amato, F., Viciani, S., and Volk, C. M.: Air mass origins influencing TTL chemical composition over West Africa during 2006 summer monsoon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10753–10770, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10753-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10753-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, K.-O., Dauhut, T., Chaboureau, J.-P., Khaykin, S., Krämer, M., and Rolf, C.: Convective hydration in the tropical tropopause layer during the StratoClim aircraft campaign: pathway of an observed hydration patch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11803–11820, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11803-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11803-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, S. H., Wilson, J. C., Baumgardner, D., Herman, R. L., Weinstock, E. M., LaFleur, B. G., Kok, G., Anderson, B., Lawson, P., Baker, B., Strawa, A., Pittman, J. V., Reeves, J. M., and Bui, T. P.:
New particle formation observed in the tropical/subtropical cirrus clouds,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
109, D20209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005033</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Li, D., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Bian, J., Günther, G., Ploeger, F., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Bai, Z., Vömel, H., and Riese, M.: Dehydration and low ozone in the tropopause layer over the Asian monsoon caused by tropical cyclones: Lagrangian transport calculations using ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalysis data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4133–4152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4133-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4133-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Mahnke, C., Weigel, R., Cairo, F., Vernier, J.-P., Afchine, A., Krämer, M., Mitev, V., Matthey, R., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Ploeger, F., Deshler, T., and Borrmann, S.: The ATAL within the 2017 Asian Monsoon Anticyclone: Microphysical aerosol properties derived from aircraft-borne in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1241" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1241</a>, in review, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
McKenna, D. S., Konopka, P., Grooss, J. U., Günther, G., Müller, R., Spang, R., Offermann, D., and Orsolini, Y.:
A new Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) – 1. Formulation of advection and mixing,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
107, 4309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd000114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd000114</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Merikanto, J., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Pickering, S. J., and Carslaw, K. S.: Impact of nucleation on global CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8601–8616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Metzger, A., Verheggen, B., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Riipinen, I., Kulmala, M., Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., and Baltensperger, U.:
Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol particle formation under atmospheric conditions,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
107, 6646–6651, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hudson, P. K., Matthew, B. M., Middlebrook, A. M., Peltier, R. E., Sullivan, A., Thomson, D. S., and Weber, R. J.:
Single-particle mass spectrometry of tropospheric aerosol particles,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
111, D23s32, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007340" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007340</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Froyd, K. D., Schwarz, J. P., and Wilson, J. C.:
Observations of the chemical composition of stratospheric aerosol particles,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
140, 1269–1278, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2213" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2213</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Nieminen, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., Aalto, P. P., Arshinov, M., Asmi, E., Baltensperger, U., Beddows, D. C. S., Beukes, J. P., Collins, D., Ding, A., Harrison, R. M., Henzing, B., Hooda, R., Hu, M., Hőrrak, U., Kivekäs, N., Komsaare, K., Krejci, R., Kristensson, A., Laakso, L., Laaksonen, A., Leaitch, W. R., Lihavainen, H., Mihalopoulos, N., Németh, Z., Nie, W., O'Dowd, C., Salma, I., Sellegri, K., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tunved, P., Ulevicius, V., Vakkari, V., Vana, M., Wiedensohler, A., Wu, Z., Virtanen, A., and Kulmala, M.: Global analysis of continental boundary layer new particle formation based on long-term measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14737–14756, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14737-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14737-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, L. L., Honomichl, S. B., Kinnison, D. E., Abalos, M., Randel, W. J., Bergman, J. W., and Bian, J.: Transport of chemical tracers from the boundary layer to stratosphere associated with the dynamics of the Asian summer monsoon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 14159–14174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025616" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025616</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Park, M., Randel, W. J., Gettelman, A., Massie, S. T., and Jiang, J. H.:
Transport above the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone inferred from Aura Microwave Limb Sounder tracers,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
112, D16309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008294" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008294</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Park, M., Randel, W. J., Emmons, L. K., and Livesey, N. J.:
Transport pathways of carbon monoxide in the Asian summer monsoon diagnosed from Model of Ozone and Related Tracers (MOZART),
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, D08303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010621" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010621</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Piani, C., Durran, D., Alexander, M. J., and Holton, J. R.:
A Numerical Study of Three-Dimensional Gravity Waves Triggered by Deep Tropical Convection and Their Role in the Dynamics of the QBO,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
57, 3689–3702, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;3689:Ansotd&gt;2.0.Co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;3689:Ansotd&gt;2.0.Co;2</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Pisso, I. and Legras, B.: Turbulent vertical diffusivity in the sub-tropical stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 697–707, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-697-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-697-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Ploeger, F., Günther, G., Konopka, P., Fueglistaler, S., Müller, R., Hoppe, C., Kunz, A., Spang, R., Grooss, J. U., and Riese, M.:
Horizontal water vapor transport in the lower stratosphere from subtropics to high latitudes during boreal summer,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 8111–8127, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50636" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50636</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Ploeger, F., Gottschling, C., Griessbach, S., Grooß, J.-U., Guenther, G., Konopka, P., Müller, R., Riese, M., Stroh, F., Tao, M., Ungermann, J., Vogel, B., and von Hobe, M.: A potential vorticity-based determination of the transport barrier in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13145–13159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Walker, K., and Riese, M.: Quantifying pollution transport from the Asian monsoon anticyclone into the lower stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7055–7066, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7055-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7055-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Ploeger, F., Diallo, M., Charlesworth, E., Konopka, P., Legras, B., Laube, J. C., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Engel, A., and Riese, M.: The stratospheric Brewer–Dobson circulation inferred from age of air in the ERA5 reanalysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8393–8412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8393-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8393-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Pommrich, R., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Konopka, P., Ploeger, F., Vogel, B., Tao, M., Hoppe, C. M., Günther, G., Spelten, N., Hoffmann, L., Pumphrey, H.-C., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Volk, C. M., Hoor, P., Schlager, H., and Riese, M.: Tropical troposphere to stratosphere transport of carbon monoxide and long-lived trace species in the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2895–2916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2895-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2895-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Randel, W. J. and Park, M.:
Deep convective influence on the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone and associated tracer variability observed with Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS),
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
111, D12314, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006490" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006490</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
German Aerospace Center: HALO database, available at:  <a href="https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/mission/101" target="_blank"/>, last access: 30 July 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Riccobono, F., Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E., Dommen, J., Ortega, I. K., Rondo, L., Almeida, J., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Downard, A., Dunne, E. M., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Hansel, A., Junninen, H., Kajos, M., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A., Kürten, A., Kvashin, A. N., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Petaja, T., Praplan, A. P., Santos, F. D., Schallhart, S., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipila, M., Spracklen, D. V., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tome, A., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Wimmer, D., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Baltensperger, U.:
Oxidation Products of Biogenic Emissions Contribute to Nucleation of Atmospheric Particles,
Science,
344, 717–721, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243527" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243527</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Rollins, A. W., Thornberry, T. D., Watts, L. A., Yu, P., Rosenlof, K. H., Mills, M., Baumann, E., Giorgetta, F. R., Bui, T. V., Hopfner, M., Walker, K. A., Boone, C., Bernath, P. F., Colarco, P. R., Newman, P. A., Fahey, D. W., and Gao, R. S.:
The role of sulfur dioxide in stratospheric aerosol formation evaluated by using in situ measurements in the tropical lower stratosphere,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
44, 4280–4286, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl072754" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl072754</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Rosen, J. M.:
The Boiling Point of Stratospheric Aerosols,
J. Appl. Meteorol.,
10, 1044–1046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1971)010&lt;1044:tbposa&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1971)010&lt;1044:tbposa&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Sahyoun, M., Freney, E., Brito, J., Duplissy, J., Gouhier, M., Colomb, A., Dupuy, R., Bourianne, T., Nowak, J. B., Yan, C., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Schwarzenboeck, A., Planche, C., and Sellegri, K.:
Evidence of New Particle Formation Within Etna and Stromboli Volcanic Plumes and Its Parameterization From Airborne In Situ Measurements,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
124, 5650–5668, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd028882" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd028882</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Santee, M. L., Manney, G. L., Livesey, N. J., Schwartz, M. J., Neu, J. L., and Read, W. G.:
A comprehensive overview of the climatological composition of the Asian summermonsoon anticyclone based on 10 years of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder measurements,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
122, 5491–5514, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026408" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026408</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Schneider, J., Weigel, R., Klimach, T., Dragoneas, A., Appel, O., Hünig, A., Molleker, S., Köllner, F., Clemen, H.-C., Eppers, O., Hoppe, P., Hoor, P., Mahnke, C., Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Grooß, J.-U., Zahn, A., Obersteiner, F., Ravegnani, F., Ulanovsky, A., Schlager, H., Scheibe, M., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., Nowak, J. B., Zöger, M., and Borrmann, S.: Aircraft-based observation of meteoric material in lower-stratospheric aerosol particles between 15 and 68°&thinsp;N, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 989–1013, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-989-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-989-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Sellegri, K., Rose, C., Marinoni, A., Lupi, A., Wiedensohler, A., Andrade, M., Bonasoni, P., and Laj, P.:
New Particle Formation: A Review of Ground-Based Observations at Mountain Research Stations,
Atmosphere-Basel,
10, 493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/Atmos10090493" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/Atmos10090493</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Sokolov, L. and Lepuchov, B.: Protocol of interaction between Unit for Connection with Scientific Equipment (UCSE) and on-board scientific equipment of Geophysica aircraft (Second edition), Myasishchev Design Bureau (MDB), Moscow, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Song, I.-S., Chun, H.-Y., and Lane, T. P.:
Generation Mechanisms of Convectively Forced Internal Gravity Waves and Their Propagation to the Stratosphere,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
60, 1960–1980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060&lt;1960:Gmocfi&gt;2.0.Co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060&lt;1960:Gmocfi&gt;2.0.Co;2</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Stenke, A., Schraner, M., Rozanov, E., Egorova, T., Luo, B., and Peter, T.: The SOCOL version 3.0 chemistry–climate model: description, evaluation, and implications from an advanced transport algorithm, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1407–1427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1407-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1407-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Stolzenburg, D., Simon, M., Ranjithkumar, A., Kürten, A., Lehtipalo, K., Gordon, H., Ehrhart, S., Finkenzeller, H., Pichelstorfer, L., Nieminen, T., He, X.-C., Brilke, S., Xiao, M., Amorim, A., Baalbaki, R., Baccarini, A., Beck, L., Bräkling, S., Caudillo Murillo, L., Chen, D., Chu, B., Dada, L., Dias, A., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., El Haddad, I., Fischer, L., Gonzalez Carracedo, L., Heinritzi, M., Kim, C., Koenig, T. K., Kong, W., Lamkaddam, H., Lee, C. P., Leiminger, M., Li, Z., Makhmutov, V., Manninen, H. E., Marie, G., Marten, R., Müller, T., Nie, W., Partoll, E., Petäjä, T., Pfeifer, J., Philippov, M., Rissanen, M. P., Rörup, B., Schobesberger, S., Schuchmann, S., Shen, J., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tauber, C., Tham, Y. J., Tomé, A., Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Wagner, A. C., Wang, M., Wang, Y., Weber, S. K., Wimmer, D., Wlasits, P. J., Wu, Y., Ye, Q., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Flagan, R. C., Hansel, A., Kulmala, M., Lelieveld, J., Volkamer, R., Kirkby, J., and Winkler, P. M.: Enhanced growth rate of atmospheric particles from sulfuric acid, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7359–7372, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7359-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7359-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, M. J., Cox, R. A., and Kalberer, M.: Compilation and evaluation of gas phase diffusion coefficients of reactive trace gases in the atmosphere: volume 1. Inorganic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9233–9247, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9233-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9233-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Thomason, L. W. and Peter, T. (Eds.): Assessment of Stratospheric Aerosol Properties (ASAP), SPARC Report No. 4, World Climate Research Programme WCRP –124, WMO/TD No. 1295, SPARC office, available at: <a href="https://www.sparc-climate.org/publications/sparc-reports/sparc-report-no-4/" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 30 July 2021), 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Thomason, L. W. and Vernier, J.-P.: Improved SAGE II cloud/aerosol categorization and observations of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer: 1989–2005, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4605–4616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4605-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4605-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Tissier, A.-S. and Legras, B.: Convective sources of trajectories traversing the tropical tropopause layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3383–3398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3383-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3383-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Tzella, A. and Legras, B.: A Lagrangian view of convective sources for transport of air across the Tropical Tropopause Layer: distribution, times and the radiative influence of clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12517–12534, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12517-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12517-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Venzac, H., Sellegri, K., Laj, P., Villani, P., Bonasoni, P., Marinoni, A., Cristofanelli, P., Calzolari, F., Fuzzi, S., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Vuillermoz, E., and Verza, G. P.:
High frequency new particle formation in the Himalayas,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
105, 15666–15671, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801355105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801355105</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Vernier, J. P., Thomason, L. W., and Kar, J.:
CALIPSO detection of an Asian tropopause aerosol layer,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
38, L07804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl046614" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl046614</a>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Vernier, J. P., Thomason, L. W., Pommereau, J. P., Bourassa, A., Pelon, J., Garnier, A., Hauchecorne, A., Blanot, L., Trepte, C., Degenstein, D., and Vargas, F.:
Major influence of tropical volcanic eruptions on the stratospheric aerosol layer during the last decade,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
38, L12807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl047563" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl047563</a>, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Vernier, J. P., Fairlie, T. D., Natarajan, M., Wienhold, F. G., Bian, J., Martinsson, B. G., Crumeyrolle, S., Thomason, L. W., and Bedka, K. M.:
Increase in upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric aerosol levels and its potential connection with Asian pollution,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
120, 1608–1619, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022372</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Vernier, J.-P., Fairlie, T. D., Deshler, T., Ratnam, M. V., Gadhavi, H., Kumar, B. S., Natarajan, M., Pandit, A. K., Raj, S. T. A., Kumar, A. H., Jayaraman, A., Singh, A. K., Rastogi, N., Sinha, P. R., Kumar, S., Tiwari, S., Wegner, T., Baker, N., Vignelles, D., Stenchikov, G., Shevchenko, I., Smith, J., Bedka, K., Kesarkar, A., Singh, V., Bhate, J., Ravikiran, V., Rao, M. D., Ravindrababu, S., Patel, A., Vernier, H., Wienhold, F. G., Liu, H., Knepp, T. N., Thomason, L., Crawford, J., Ziemba, L., Moore, J., Crumeyrolle, S., Williamson, M., Berthet, G., Jégou, F., and Renard, J.-B.:
BATAL: The Balloon Measurement Campaigns of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
99, 955–973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-17-0014.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-17-0014.1</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Mazzinghi, P., Castagnoli, F., Toci, G., and Werle, P.:
A cryogenically operated laser diode spectrometer for airborne measurement of stratospheric trace gases,
Appl. Phys. B,
90, 581–592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-007-2885-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-007-2885-2</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Viciani, S., Montori, A., Chiarugi, A., and D'Amato, F.:
A Portable Quantum Cascade Laser Spectrometer for Atmospheric Measurements of Carbon Monoxide,
Sensors,
18, 2380, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072380" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072380</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Vincent, R. A. and Alexander, M. J.:
Gravity waves in the tropical lower stratosphere: An observational study of seasonal and interannual variability,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
105, 17971–17982, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900196" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900196</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, B., Günther, G., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Hoor, P., Krämer, M., Müller, S., Zahn, A., and Riese, M.: Fast transport from Southeast Asia boundary layer sources to northern Europe: rapid uplift in typhoons and eastward eddy shedding of the Asian monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12745–12762, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12745-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12745-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, B., Müller, R., Günther, G., Spang, R., Hanumanthu, S., Li, D., Riese, M., and Stiller, G. P.: Lagrangian simulations of the transport of young air masses to the top of the Asian monsoon anticyclone and into the tropical pipe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6007–6034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6007-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6007-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
von der Weiden, S.-L., Drewnick, F., and Borrmann, S.: Particle Loss Calculator – a new software tool for the assessment of the performance of aerosol inlet systems, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 479–494, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
von Hobe, M., Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Kloss, C., Ulanowski, A., Yushkov, V., Ravegnani, F., Volk, C. M., Pan, L. L., Honomichl, S. B., Tilmes, S., Kinnison, D. E., Garcia, R. R., and Wright, J. S.: Upward transport into and within the Asian monsoon anticyclone as inferred from StratoClim trace gas observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1267–1285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, M., Kong, W., Marten, R., He, X.-C., Chen, D., Pfeifer, J., Heitto, A., Kontkanen, J., Dada, L., Kürten, A., Yli-Juuti, T., Manninen, H. E., Amanatidis, S., Amorim, A., Baalbaki, R., Baccarini, A., Bell, D. M., Bertozzi, B., Bräkling, S., Brilke, S., Murillo, L. C., Chiu, R., Chu, B., De Menezes, L.-P., Duplissy, J., Finkenzeller, H., Carracedo, L. G., Granzin, M., Guida, R., Hansel, A., Hofbauer, V., Krechmer, J., Lehtipalo, K., Lamkaddam, H., Lampimäki, M., Lee, C. P., Makhmutov, V., Marie, G., Mathot, S., Mauldin, R. L., Mentler, B., Müller, T., Onnela, A., Partoll, E., Petäjä, T., Philippov, M., Pospisilova, V., Ranjithkumar, A., Rissanen, M., Rörup, B., Scholz, W., Shen, J., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stolzenburg, D., Tham, Y. J., Tomé, A., Wagner, A. C., Wang, D. S., Wang, Y., Weber, S. K., Winkler, P. M., Wlasits, P. J., Wu, Y., Xiao, M., Ye, Q., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Zhou, X., Volkamer, R., Riipinen, I., Dommen, J., Curtius, J., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Kirkby, J., Seinfeld, J. H., El-Haddad, I., Flagan, R. C., and Donahue, N. M.:
Rapid growth of new atmospheric particles by nitric acid and ammonia condensation,
Nature,
581, 184–189, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2270-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2270-4</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Wehner, B., Werner, F., Ditas, F., Shaw, R. A., Kulmala, M., and Siebert, H.: Observations of new particle formation in enhanced UV irradiance zones near cumulus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11701–11711, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11701-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11701-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Weigel, R., Hermann, M., Curtius, J., Voigt, C., Walter, S., Böttger, T., Lepukhov, B., Belyaev, G., and Borrmann, S.: Experimental characterization of the COndensation PArticle counting System for high altitude aircraft-borne application, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 243–258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-243-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-243-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Weigel, R., Borrmann, S., Kazil, J., Minikin, A., Stohl, A., Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Kunkel, D., de Reus, M., Frey, W., Lovejoy, E. R., Volk, C. M., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Schiller, C., Peter, T., Schlager, H., Cairo, F., Law, K. S., Shur, G. N., Belyaev, G. V., and Curtius, J.: In situ observations of new particle formation in the tropical upper troposphere: the role of clouds and the nucleation mechanism, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9983–10010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9983-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9983-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Weigel, R., Volk, C. M., Kandler, K., Hösen, E., Günther, G., Vogel, B., Grooß, J.-U., Khaykin, S., Belyaev, G. V., and Borrmann, S.: Enhancements of the refractory submicron aerosol fraction in the Arctic polar vortex: feature or exception?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12319–12342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12319-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12319-2014</a>, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Weigel, R., Mahnke, C., Baumgartner, M., Krämer, M., Spichtinger, P., Spelten, N., Afchine, A., Rolf, C., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Tost, H., and Borrmann, S.: New particle formation inside ice clouds: In-situ observations in the tropical tropopause layer of the 2017 Asian Monsoon Anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1285" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1285</a>, in review, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Weigelt, A., Hermann, M., van Velthoven, P. F. J., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Schlaf, G., Zahn, A., and Wiedensohler, A.:
Influence of clouds on aerosol particle number concentrations in the upper troposphere,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, D01204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009805" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009805</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Williamson, C., Kupc, A., Wilson, J., Gesler, D. W., Reeves, J. M., Erdesz, F., McLaughlin, R., and Brock, C. A.: Fast time response measurements of particle size distributions in the 3–60&thinsp;nm size range with the nucleation mode aerosol size spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3491–3509, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3491-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3491-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Williamson, C. J., Kupc, A., Axisa, D., Bilsback, K. R., Bui, T., Campuzano-Jost, P., Dollner, M., Froyd, K. D., Hodshire, A. L., Jimenez, J. L., Kodros, J. K., Luo, G., Murphy, D. M., Nault, B. A., Ray, E. A., Weinzierl, B., Wilson, J. C., Yu, F., Yu, P., Pierce, J. R., and Brock, C. A.:
A large source of cloud condensation nuclei from new particle formation in the tropics,
Nature,
574, 399–403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1638-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1638-9</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
WMO:
Meteorology – A three-dimensional science,
WMO Bull.,
134–138, 1957.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
WMO:
International Meteorological Tables, WMO-No.188.TP97,
edited by: Letestu, S.,
Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1966.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Wright, C. J. and Gille, J. C.: HIRDLS observations of gravity wave momentum fluxes over the monsoon regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D12103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015725" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015725</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, F. Q., Luo, G., Bates, T. S., Anderson, B., Clarke, A., Kapustin, V., Yantosca, R. M., Wang, Y. X., and Wu, S. L.:
Spatial distributions of particle number concentrations in the global troposphere: Simulations, observations, and implications for nucleation mechanisms,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
115, D17205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013473" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013473</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, P., Rosenlof, K. H., Liu, S., Telg, H., Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Portmann, R. W., Bai, Z., Ray, E. A., Duan, Y., Pan, L. L., Toon, O. B., Bian, J., and Gao, R.-S.:
Efficient transport of tropospheric aerosol into the stratosphere via the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci.,
114, 6972–6977, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701170114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701170114</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, P. F., Toon, O. B., Neely, R. R., Martinsson, B. G., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.:
Composition and physical properties of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer and the North American Tropospheric Aerosol Layer,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
42, 2540–2546, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063181" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063181</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., McMurry, P. H., Yu, F. Q., and Jacobson, M. Z.:
A comparative study of nucleation parameterizations: 1. Examination and evaluation of the formulations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
115, D20212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014150" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014150</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
