<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-11337-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Measurement report: Long-emission-wavelength chromophores dominate the light absorption of brown carbon in aerosols over Bangkok: impact from biomass burning</article-title><alt-title>Long-emission-wavelength chromophores dominate the light absorption of BrC​​​​​​​</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Long-emission-wavelength chromophores dominate the light absorption of BrC​​​​​​​}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. Tang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Jiao</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-8174</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Jiaqi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhong</surname><given-names>Guangcai</given-names></name>
          <email>gczhong@gig.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Hongxing</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4146-2765</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Mo</surname><given-names>Yangzhi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6075-3421</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Bolong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Geng</surname><given-names>Xiaofei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Yingjun</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4784-8282</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Jianhui</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9006-263X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>Congguo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Bualert</surname><given-names>Surat</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jun</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-1642</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Gan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key
Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou
Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>CAS Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou 510640,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China​​​​​​​</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological
Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yantai 264003, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Faculty of Environment, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Guangcai Zhong (gczhong@gig.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>11337</fpage><lpage>11352</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>9</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e232">Chromophores represent an important portion of light-absorbing
species, i.e., brown carbon. Yet knowledge of what and how chromophores
contribute to aerosol light absorption is still sparse. To address this
problem, we examined soluble independent chromophores in a set of year-round
aerosol samples from Bangkok. The water-soluble fluorescent chromophores
identified via excitation–emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy and follow-up
parallel factor analysis could be mainly assigned as humic-like substances
and protein-like substances, which differed in their EEM pattern from that
of the methanol-soluble fraction. The emission wavelength of fluorescent
chromophores in environmental samples tended to increase compared with that
of the primary combustion emission, which could be attributed to secondary
formation or the aging process. Fluorescent indices inferred that these
light-absorbing chromophores were not significantly humified and comprised a
mixture of organic matter of terrestrial and microbial origin, which
exhibited a different characteristic from primary biomass burning and coal-combustion results. A multiple linear regression analysis revealed that
larger fluorescent chromophores that were oxygen-rich and highly aromatic
with high molecular weights were the key contributors of light absorption,
preferably at longer emission wavelengths
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 nm). Positive matrix factorization analysis further suggested that up to
50 % of these responsible chromophores originated from biomass burning
emissions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e262">Atmospheric aerosols play a substantial role in climate change through
radiative forcing (Alexander et al., 2008). Carbonaceous aerosols
mainly include organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC). Brown carbon
(BrC) is a specific type of OC that absorbs radiation efficiently in the
near-ultraviolet and visible (UV–Vis) range (Laskin et al.,
2015; Kirchstetter et al., 2004) and may contribute 15 % or more of total
light absorption over the UV–Vis spectrum (Kirchstetter and Thatcher,
2012; Liu et al., 2013). This fraction can significantly affect atmospheric
chemistry, air quality, and climate change (Marrero-Ortiz et al.,
2018; Laskin et al., 2015).<?pagebreak page11338?> Forest fires, residential heating by wood and
coal, biogenic release, and secondary formation contribute to BrC in the
atmosphere (Laskin et al., 2015). Many studies have indicated that
the optical properties of BrC may significantly evolve as a result of
atmospheric processes such as oxidation (Fan et al., 2020), solar
irradiation (Wong et al., 2017), and relative
humidity (Kasthuriarachchi et al., 2020). These factors
cause variability in the chemical compositions and levels of BrC across
source regions and receptors, resulting in a high degree of uncertainty
regarding the effects of BrC (Dasari et al., 2019; Xie et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e265">Light absorption of BrC is associated with its molecular composition and
chemical structure (Song et al., 2019; Lin et al., 2018; Mo et al.,
2018; Jiang et al., 2020). Detailed structural characterization of BrC
compounds is essential to understand their sources and chemical processes in
the atmosphere. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) is a powerful tool
for molecular-level chemical analysis of organic aerosols
(Laskin et al., 2018). Combinations of offline
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), a photodiode array detector,
and HRMS allow the chemical characterization of aerosols specific to BrC
(Lin et al., 2018, 2016, 2015, 2017).
With these combination approaches, nitroaromatics, aromatic acids, phenols,
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and their derivatives are basically
identified as BrC chromophores (X. Wang et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2020).
However, it should be noted that it is difficult to ionize some organic
compounds for detection using HRMS, and even for those that can be detected,
HRMS can only provide possible molecular structures based on empirical
deduction (Song et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2015). The isomeric complexity
of natural organic matter may have exceeded achievable one-dimensional
chromatographic resolution (Hawkes et al., 2018),
and therefore the majority of components in the BrC mixture remain
undetermined.</p>
      <p id="d1e268">Excitation–emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy detects bulk
chromophores in a solution (Chen et al., 2016b). Chromophores can be
revealed by EEM with information on their chemical structures associated
with molecular weight, aromatic rings, and conjugated systems
(Wu et al., 2003). For example, a red shift in emission
spectral maxima can be caused by an increase in the number of aromatic rings
condensed in a straight chain, conjugated double bonds, or formational
changes that permit vibrational energy losses of the promoted electrons
(Wu et al., 2003). A significant Stokes shift with emission
wavelength can be observed in aged secondary organic aerosol (SOA) using
EEM spectroscopy (Lee et al., 2013). Parallel factor
(PARAFAC) analysis has been widely used to decompose the EEM spectral
signature into independent underlying components (Han et al., 2020; Yue et
al., 2019; Wu et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2019b), adding valuable information
to absorbance-based measurements (Yan and Kim, 2017). This
technique helps to categorize groups of similar fluorophores or chromophores
or similar optical properties, thereby allowing a better understanding of
the chemical properties of BrC, but it should be noted that not all
chromophores in BrC compounds are fluorescent (Chen et al., 2019a). There
is evidence that BrC absorption is closely correlated with fluorescent
chromophores (Huo et al., 2018). However, the intrinsic
relationship between fluorescent chromophores and BrC absorption has not
been explored.</p>
      <p id="d1e271">Southeast Asia is subject to intensive regional biomass burning, the
emissions from which may contribute to atmospheric brown clouds
(Ramanathan et al., 2007; Laskin et al., 2015). The contribution of
biomass burning to aerosol optical depth was evaluated to be more than
56 % over this region (Huang et al., 2013). Despite many
studies focused on the characterization of atmospheric black carbon (BC)
(See et al., 2006; Fujii et al., 2014; Permadi et al., 2018), studies on
BrC in the region are still limited. A recent study in Singapore indicated
that water-soluble OC (WSOC) exhibits strong wavelength dependence and even
higher values of BrC absorption than those from Korea, India, China, and
Nepal (Adam et al., 2020), indicating abundant water-soluble
BrC in the air over Southeast Asia.</p>
      <p id="d1e275">This study was performed to explore the relationships between EEM
chromophores and BrC light absorption in soluble aerosol organic matter. A
set of year-round aerosol samples from Bangkok, Thailand, was analyzed.
Water-soluble and methanol-soluble BrC in the aerosol samples was
characterized by EEM, followed by statistical analyses to retrieve
information on the contributions of fluorescent chromophores to BrC light
absorption and their emission sources. This study provides a
comprehensive dataset on seasonal variability in the light absorption
properties, sources, and chemical components of BrC, which may be useful for
improving further modeling and field observation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experiment</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sample collection and extraction</title>
      <?pagebreak page11339?><p id="d1e293">A total of 85 total suspended particulate (TSP) samples were collected on the
roof (57 m above ground level) of the Faculty of Environment at Kasetsart
University (100<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>57<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>85<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) in
Bangkok, Thailand (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). Detailed information about the sampling site is
presented elsewhere (J. Wang et al., 2020). Sampling was
performed from 18 January 2016 to 28 January 2017, and the sampling period
was divided into four seasons: the pre-hot season (18 January–28 February
2016), hot season (2 March–30 May 2016), monsoon (2 June–30 October
2016), and cool season (1 November 2016–28 January 2017). Table S1 lists
the average meteorological data in the four seasons. Generally, during the
sampling period, the hot season was characterized by high temperatures and
wind speeds, and the monsoon season was characterized by high humidity. TSP samples were
collected over 24 h using a high-volume (0.3 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) sampler
with quartz-fiber filters (QFFs, prebaked for 6 h at 450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).
All samples and field blanks were stored under dark conditions at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e379">WSOC was prepared by ultrasonication extraction of filter punches with
ultrapure deionized water (resistivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18.2 M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The methanol-soluble OC (MSOC) fraction was then obtained by extracting the
freeze-dried residue on the same QFFs after water extraction with HPLC-grade
methanol, which is used for water-insoluble fractions (Chen and
Bond, 2010). It is worth noting that the MSOC in this study is not
necessarily like that of the same name in other studies. The extract
solutions were passed through 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m PTFE filters and subjected to
follow-up UV–Vis absorption and fluorescence spectral analysis. The mass
concentrations of WSOC and MSOC were measured, and the methods are shown in
the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Absorption spectra and fluorescence spectra</title>
      <p id="d1e412">The extract solutions were placed in quartz cells with a path-length of 1 cm
and subjected to analysis using a fluorometer (Aqualog; Horiba Scientific,
USA). Absorption spectra and EEM spectra were obtained simultaneously using
this instrument. The contribution of solvents was subtracted from the
extract spectra. UV–Vis absorption spectra were scanned in the range of 239
to 800 nm with a step size of 3 nm. The fluorescence spectra were recorded
with an emission wavelength (Em) ranging from 247.01 to 825.03 nm and
excitation wavelength (Ex) ranging from 239 to 800 nm. The wavelength
increments of the scans for Em and Ex were 4.66 and 3 nm, respectively. The
calculation of optical parameters and the relative contributions of BrC to
total aerosol light absorption are presented in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Factor analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e423">In this study, we built a PARAFAC model based on 85 TSP sample fluorescence
(samples <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ex <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Em: 85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 188 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 125,
85-model). Original EEM spectra were corrected and decomposed via PARAFAC
analysis with reference to earlier methods using drEEM toolbox version 2.0
with MATLAB software (<uri>http://models.life.ku.dk/drEEM</uri>, last access: June
2014) (Murphy et al., 2013; Andersson and Bro, 2000). The
absorbance, all below 1 at 239 nm, was deemed suitable for correcting the
EEM spectra for inner filter effects (IFEs) (Luciani et al., 2009; Gu and
Kenny, 2009; Fu et al., 2015), and the sample EEM spectra and blanks were
normalized relative to the Raman peak area of ultrapure deionized water
collected on the same day to correct fluorescence in Raman units (RU)
(Murphy et al., 2013, 2010). Spectra with Em <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 580 nm and Ex <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 nm were removed to eliminate noisy data. The
non-negativity constraint is necessary to obtain reasonable spectra, and
signals of first-order Rayleigh and Raman scattering as well as second-order Rayleigh scattering
in the EEM spectra were removed using the interpolation method
(Bahram et al., 2006). The two- to nine-component PARAFAC model was
explored within the context of spectral loading, core consistency, and
residual analysis (Figs. S2–S5). Finally, seven and six components were
identified in the WSOC and MSOC fractions, which explained 99.89 % and
99.76 % of the variance, respectively. Both the seven- and six-component
PARAFAC solutions passed the split-half analysis with the split style of
S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>T<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and residuals were examined to ensure that there
was no systematic variation. The parameters obtained from the PARAFAC model
were used to calculate the approximate abundance of each component,
expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in RU), corresponding to the maximum fluorescence
intensity for a particular sample.</p>
      <p id="d1e510">Fluorescence indices based on intensity ratios  provide insight into the
origins of dissolved BrC, such as the humification index (HIX) (the ratio of
average emission intensity in the 435–480 nm range to that in the
300–345 nm range following excitation at 254 nm, which was used to reflect
the degree of humification) (Zsolnay et al., 1999), the biological
index (BIX) (the ratio of emission intensities at 380 and 430 nm following
excitation at 310 nm, reflecting autochthonous biological activity in water
samples) (Huguet et al., 2009), and the fluorescence index (FI) (the ratio of
emission intensities at 470 and 520 nm following excitation at 370 nm,
reflecting the possibility of microbial origin and for examining differences
in precursor organic materials) (Lee et al., 2013; Murphy et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e521">A hierarchical cluster method was used to classify aerosol samples based on
the relative contributions of PARAFAC components to the respective samples.
The squared Euclidean distance method was used to evaluate the distances
between samples, and the between-group linkage method was chosen for
hierarchical cluster analysis. The multiple linear regression (MLR) model
was applied to elucidate the relationship between fluorescent chromophores
and light absorption of BrC using a stepwise screening process. Analyses
were performed using SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>EEM of dissolved organic substances</title>
      <p id="d1e540">Fluorescence spectra coupled with PARAFAC results can provide more
information about the chemical structures of chromophores. Figure 1 and
Table S2 show the seven-component (P1–P7) PARAFAC solutions of WSOC in the
samples of aerosol over Bangkok, the peaks of which fell mainly into the
humic-like and protein-like chromophore regions in the plots. Components P2,
P3, P4, and P6 were identified as humic-like substances (HULIS) (H. Chen et
al., 2017; Stedmon and Markager, 2005; Wu et al., 2019; Chen et<?pagebreak page11340?> al., 2003). A
second peak was observed at a high excitation wavelength for these
components, indicating the existence of a large number of condensed aromatic
moieties, conjugated bonds, and nonlinear ring systems
(Matos et al., 2015). Among them, P2, P3, and P4 had a
longer emission wavelength (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 nm) than P6, likely due to the
low probability of fluorescence emission from quinonoid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transitions
(Cory and McKnight, 2005). P3 produced spectra similar to those of
aqueous reaction products of hydroxyacetone with glycine (Gao and Zhang,
2018) and dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the surface water of Xiangxi
Bay and Three Gorges Reservoir (Wang et al., 2019). P6 had a peak similar
to those in the fluorescence spectra of N-containing SOA species formed by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene under ozonolysis and photooxidation with NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in a flow reactor (Babar et al., 2017) as well as
pyridoxine (Pöhlker et al., 2012), indicating a possible
biological source. P5 was similar to a previously identified fluorophore in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from Xi'an (Chen et al., 2019b). P1 and P7 could be assigned
as protein-like organic matter (PLOM) due to their short emission
wavelengths (Wu et al., 2003). Specifically, P7 resembled a
tyrosine-like fluorophore (Zhou et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2003) and may
be related to non-N-containing species (Chen et al., 2016b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e592">The fluorescent components identified by the PARAFAC (parallel
factor) analysis for the EEM of water-soluble organic carbon (P1–P7, WSOC, <bold>a</bold>) and methanol-soluble organic carbon (C1–C6, MSOC, <bold>b</bold>) in the aerosol samples over Bangkok in Thailand (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85). The color represents the fact that the intensity was normalized to set the maximum as 0.1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11337/2021/acp-21-11337-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e621">The MSOC fraction extracted from the filter residue after water extraction
produced fluorescence signals with fluorescence patterns different from
those of the WSOC fraction, indicating a different chemical composition from
that of WSOC. Thus, WSOC with the addition of MSOC may provide a more
comprehensive description of the optical and chemical characteristics of BrC
compared to WSOC alone. Six components (C1–C6) were resolved for the MSOC.
Among them, C1 and C2 were associated with shorter excitation wavelengths
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 nm) but longer emission wavelengths (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 380 nm),
indicating the presence of fulvic-like substances (Chen et al.,
2003; Mounier et al., 1999). C6 produced a pattern similar to that of
tyrosine-like fluorescence (Stedmon and Markager, 2005).
Although C4 had a similar EEM spectrum as P4 of WSOC, the two components
were chemically different in polarity, suggesting different behaviors in the
environment (Ishii and Boyer, 2012). Note that there
were no special chemical structures for the different types of chromophores,
and therefore the origins and chemical structures of HULIS and PLOM studied
here are not necessarily like those with the same names in other types of
organic matter.</p>
      <p id="d1e639">To further explore the potential sources of the EEM–PARAFAC components, we
added 60 source samples to the matrices. The source sample EEM data were
described in our previous study (Tang et al.,
2020b), including those of 33 biomass burning samples (IDs: 1–33), 17
coal-combustion samples (IDs: 34–50) samples, eight tunnel samples (IDs:
51–58), and two vehicle exhaust samples from trucks (IDs: 59–60), which
are important sources of BrC in the atmosphere. This, in combination with
our Bangkok field samples, yielded a new matrix (145 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 188 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 125, 145-model) for modeling. PARAFAC analysis successfully
decomposed the dataset, and the output was the same as for the 85-model. The
component solutions are presented in Fig. S6. To validate the stability of
the model after loading by the new matrix, the Tucker congruence coefficient
(TCC) was calculated to determine the similarity of two fluorescence spectra
between the two models (refer to Text S3 of the Supplement). Note that a higher
TCC value would indicate a higher degree of similarity of the spectra. As
shown in Table S2 and Fig. S7, high TCC values were found as expected
between the 85-model components and the 145-model components, indicating
that the two models identified similar fluorescent chromophores. It should
be noted that one additional fluorescent component each was identified for
the WSOC and MSOC fractions in the new 145-model, but these
components were only highly characterized by source emission samples, as
reported in our previous study (Tang et al.,
2020b).</p>
      <p id="d1e656">Using the distribution proportions of the EEM–PARAFAC fitted components
(145-model), we conducted hierarchical cluster analysis of the mixed ambient
and source samples. The results are shown in Figs. S9 and S10. For the WSOC
fraction, all aerosol samples from Bangkok and tunnel samples were assigned
to cluster A, whereas biomass burning and coal-combustion aerosols were
assigned to clusters C and D, respectively. This implied that the
fluorescent chromophore types could be somewhat related to the emission
precursors of the aerosol components. However, the distribution of
fluorescent chromophores clearly varied between the ambient aerosols and
source samples. The ambient aerosol samples contained higher levels of
fluorescent chromophores with longer emission wavelengths that were related
to humic-like or fulvic-like chromophores (components 145M-P1 – the P1 component
in the 145-model, 145M-P5, and 145M-P6), whereas the primary biomass burning
and coal-combustion samples contained high-intensity fluorescent
chromophores with shorter emission wavelengths that were related to
protein-like fluorescence (145M-P2 and 145M-P4). These phenomena was
similarly reported previously; i.e., protein-like substances produce
compounds with similar fluorescence properties as humic substances under
irradiation conditions (Bianco et al., 2014). Similar differences between
field samples and source samples were found for the MSOC fraction.
Therefore, our results confirmed that chemical reaction or “aging” in the
atmosphere greatly modifies the chromophore patterns of emission sources by
both bleaching the source chromophores and producing new chromophores, and, at
least in this case, it shifts the chromophore emission wavelength toward longer
wavelengths, i.e., from protein-like to fulvic-like (Bianco et al.,
2014, 2016; Lee et al., 2013).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e662">Seasonal averages of the concentration of organic carbon (OC),
elemental carbon (EC), water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC), and
methanol-soluble organic carbon (MSOC), as well as BrC absorption, fluorescence indices,
and levoglucosan levels for aerosol samples collected from Bangkok in
Thailand. The pre-hot season is from 18 January to 29 February 2016, the hot season
is from 2 March to 31 May  2016, the monsoon is from 2 June to 30 October 2016, and the
cool season is from 1 November 2016 to 28 January 2017.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Annual</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Pre-hot season</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Hot season</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Cool season</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ave <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ave <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ave <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Ave <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Ave <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6">WSOC </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AAE (330–400 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BIX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HIX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6">MSOC </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AAE (330–400 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BIX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HIX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Levoglucosan<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (ng C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">222 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 485</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">362 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 438</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">185 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 654</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">280 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 185</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Levoglucosan <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TSP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e665"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Described elsewhere (J. Wang et al., 2020).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Fluorescence-derived indices</title>
      <p id="d1e2238">The ratios of fluorescence intensity from specific spectral regions of an
EEM were used as indicators for the relative contributions of organic matter
derived from terrestrial or microbial sources in natural waters
(Shimabuku et al., 2017; Birdwell and Engel, 2010; Mcknight et al., 2001).
HIX was initially introduced to estimate the degree of maturation of DOM in
soil (Zsolnay et al., 1999), representing the degree of humification
of organic matter, for which higher HIX values also indicate a higher degree
of polycondensation (low H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio) and aromaticity (Qin et
al., 2018). Generally, high HIX values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10) correspond to
strongly humified or aromatic organics, principally of terrestrial origin,
whereas low values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4) are indicative of autochthonous or
microbial origin. As shown in Table 1 and Fig. 2, the HIX values were
3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.99 and 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.59 for WSOC and MSOC, respectively, in
aerosol samples from Bangkok. All HIX values were less than 10, which could
be viewed as a nominal cutoff below which DOM is not significantly humified
(Birdwell and Valsaraj, 2010; Zsolnay et al., 1999; Huguet et al., 2009).
Figure 2 shows the HIX values in primary biomass burning and coal-combustion
samples, which were much lower than those in the ambient samples, indicating
that the lower values of HIX in the atmosphere likely correspond to freshly
introduced material. Lee et al. (2013) reported that
fresh SOA had low HIX values, but these values increased significantly upon
aging with ammonia. The much higher HIX values in the WSOC compared to the
MSOC suggest that WSOC may have a higher degree of aromaticity or a more
condensed chemical structure. Our previous study revealed that MSOC has a
higher molecular weight but lower aromaticity index than the corresponding
WSOC in combustion experiment aerosol samples, indicating a more aliphatic
structure in the MSOC (Tang et al., 2020b). The
HIX values of WSOC were highest in the hot season (3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1), followed
by the pre-hot season (3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1), cool season (2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.36), and
monsoon (2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22), whereas those of the MSOC tended to be higher in
the hot and cool seasons than in the monsoon and pre-hot seasons. The HIX
values in the WSOC fraction were<?pagebreak page11342?> comparable to those of water-soluble
organic aerosols in the high Arctic atmosphere (mean: 2.9) (Fu et al.,
2015) and higher than those of water-soluble aerosols (1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 in
winter and 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 in summer) over northwestern China (Qin
et al., 2018), likely indicating a higher degree of chromophore
humification.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2321">Fluorescence index (FI), biological index (BIX), and humification
index (HIX) of water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC, <bold>a, c</bold>) and
methanol-soluble organic carbon (MSOC, <bold>b, d</bold>) in aerosol samples from
Bangkok, Thailand, as well as source emission samples including biomass
burning, coal combustion, and vehicle emissions, which are encircled by a
violet, yellow, and blue region, respectively. Note that the fluorescence
characteristic of source samples was described elsewhere (Tang et al., 2020b), but the fluorescence indices were first reported in this study. The pre-hot season is from 18 January to 29 February 2016, the hot season is from 2 March to 31 May 2016, the monsoon is from 2 June to 30 October 2016, and the cool season is from 1 November 2016 to 28 January 2017.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11337/2021/acp-21-11337-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2336">The BIX and FI were previously proposed as proxies for the contribution of
biogenic organic matter and autochthonous biological activity in natural
water, respectively (Fu et al., 2015; Qin et al., 2018). For example, the
FI decreased by up to 20 %, indicating that the samples appeared
increasingly like “terrestrial” DOM, whereas the BIX increased by up to
37 %, indicating that the samples became more “autochthonous” in
character (Murphy et al., 2018; Gabor et al., 2014). FI values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4
correspond to terrestrially derived organics and higher aromaticity, whereas
values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9 correspond to microbial sources and a lower aromatic
carbon content (Mcknight et al., 2001). An increase in BIX is related to
an increase in the contribution of microbially derived organics, with high
values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1) shown to correspond to a predominantly biological or
microbial origin of DOM and the presence of organic matter freshly released
into water, whereas values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 indicate the presence of little
biological material (Huguet et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e2368">The FI and BIX values of the Bangkok aerosol samples are summarized in Table 1 and Fig. 2. The FI values of the WSOC and MSOC were 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 and
1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20, respectively, suggesting that these chromophores are
representative of both terrestrially and microbially derived organic matter.
The BIX values of the WSOC and MSOC were 0.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 and 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18, respectively. Almost all BIX values were greater than 0.6 in the two
fractions, suggesting biological or microbial contribution.
Lee et al. (2013) reported that the BIX values of SOA
samples averaged 0.6 and increased upon aging. In addition, the results of
our source samples showed that primary biomass burning and coal-combustion
samples had high FI and BIX values (Fig. 2). These results indicate that
these chromophores in Bangkok were likely freshly introduced or derived from
biomass burning and coal combustion. Further, an increase in BIX in the MSOC
in comparison with the WSOC was observed in primary biomass burning and
coal-combustion samples, consistent with the<?pagebreak page11343?> Bangkok samples. The BIX values
were similar to those in the WSOC in Arctic aerosols (0.6–0.96, mean: 0.72),
which were within the extreme values for the predominance of humic- or
protein-like fluorophores (Fu et al., 2015). BIX values exhibited the
opposite trend from HIX values, with low BIX values in the hot season. This
may be explained by a previous study showing that a high BIX appears to
indicate little humification (Birdwell and Engel, 2010). It
should be noted that the fluorescence indices (FI, BIX, and HIX) were first
applied for aquatic and soil organic compounds and further extended to the
atmosphere due to the similarities in the properties of organic matter
(Graber and Rudich, 2006). However, the values observed for
primary biomass burning and coal combustion in this study differ from
the previously established fluorescence standards for aquatic environments
and soil. Therefore, caution is required when using these indices to appoint the
source of atmospheric chromophores (Wu et al., 2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Optical properties of dissolved BrC</title>
      <p id="d1e2407">Figure 3 shows the variations in soluble OC concentrations and the
corresponding light absorption coefficient at 365 nm (Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). In
general, the Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closely tracked the variations in the mass
concentrations of WSOC and MSOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.000, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.000, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) (Fig. S11), indicating that the
portions of BrC in both fractions were considerably stable. Furthermore,
light absorption at 365 nm was higher in the pre-hot season, hot season, and
cool season than that in the monsoon season. According to the levoglucosan
level, which is  generally regarded as a biomass burning tracer, and the ratios of
levoglucosan <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TSP (Table 1), we infer that the non-monsoon season was more
affected by biomass burning and also showed high absorption.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2496">Time series plots of the water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) and
methanol-soluble organic carbon (MSOC) concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) as well as the water- and methanol-extract light absorption coefficient at 365 nm (Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the aerosol samples from Bangkok, Thailand, during 2016–2017.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11337/2021/acp-21-11337-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2546">The absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) and mass absorption
efficiency (MAE) are important optical parameters reflecting the spectral
dependence and light absorption ability of BrC, respectively. The magnitude
of the AAE reflects the differences in BrC source and atmospheric processes
(Lack et al., 2013). Typically, the AAE value is close to
1 when light absorption is dominated by soot
(Kirchstetter et al., 2004), roughly 1–3 for simulated
biomass burning aerosols (Hopkins et al., 2007), and up
to 6–7 for water-soluble HULIS in biomass-burning-impacted aerosols
(Hoffer et al., 2006). The AAE values of the WSOC and MSOC between
330 and 400 nm in this study were up to 5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.68 and 5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.94
(Fig. 4), respectively, indicating strong wavelength dependence in the light
absorption capability. These high values show that BrC tends to absorb more
solar irradiation over ultraviolet wavelengths, which is comparable to BC
absorption as shown in Fig. S12. These observations indicate that BrC has
important impacts on photochemical reactions in the atmosphere (Barnard
et al., 2008).<?pagebreak page11344?> The AAE values in this study are similar to those of
water-soluble BrC over biomass-burning-impacted regions, such as Beijing
(Mo et al., 2018; Yan et al., 2015) and Guangzhou (Liu et al., 2018),
but lower than those of aerosols from simulated biomass burning and
coal-combustion experiments (Fan et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2020a; Li et
al., 2018). However, it should be noted that the BrC AAE varies in the
atmosphere. Dasari et al. (2019) reported that AAE values of
water-soluble BrC increase continuously due to photolysis of chromophores
and atmospheric oxidation during long-range transport over the Indo-Gangetic
Plain (IGP). In addition, pH changes can cause the absorption spectra of
some BrC species to shift to longer wavelengths upon deprotonation,
decreasing AAE values (Mo et al., 2017). The pH values of the WSOC fraction
for all the samples were within the range of 5–7, generally indicating no effect on the absorbance according to a prior study (Chen et al.,
2016a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2566">Time series plots of the absorption Ångström exponent (AAE,
<bold>a</bold>) as well as the mass absorption efficiency at 365 nm (MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>b</bold>) in the water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) and methanol-soluble organic carbon (MSOC) in aerosols samples from Bangkok in Thailand during 2016–2017.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11337/2021/acp-21-11337-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2590">The MAE at 365 nm (MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the WSOC was 0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C, which was higher than that of the MSOC (0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C), indicating that more water-soluble BrC with stronger light
absorption capability could be extracted with ultrapure deionized water,
whereas water-insoluble BrC is characterized by lower light absorption
capability over Bangkok. These results are consistent with those from
vehicular exhaust samples in our previous study, wherein MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
the WSOC (0.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.30 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C) were higher than those of the
MSOC (0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C) (Tang
et al., 2020b). Opposite results have been shown for primary biomass burning
and coal combustion (Tang et al., 2020b).
Similarly, Bikkina et al. (2020) observed that the marine-impacted aerosols
of the Bay of Bengal showed higher MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the WSOC fraction
than the MSOC fraction (only extract using methanol), and they explained it due
to two plausible reasons. First, the BrC aerosols over the Bay of Bengal have a
contribution from a different source (i.e., maritime influence) and contain
BrC chromophores that are more soluble in water than methanol. Second,
there could be significant photobleaching effects of different chromophores.
However, G. Wu et al. (2020) reported that the MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
methanol extracts are higher than those of WSOC in summer, whereas the
situation is reversed in winter. Therefore, we infer that the different
sources and atmospheric processes would impact the<?pagebreak page11345?> distribution of
water-soluble and methanol-soluble chromophores. The high
temperature and humidity (Table S1) and the tropical monsoon climate in
Thailand seem to promote more water-soluble chromophores over Thailand.
As not all water-insoluble components can be extracted with methanol, the
observed light absorption by MSOC would therefore likely reflect the lower
limit. Table S3 shows a comparison of the MAE values of Bangkok aerosols
with those of other regions, indicating a medium light absorption capacity.
The MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the water-soluble fraction in this study were
comparable to those of Nanjing (Chen et al., 2018), Guangzhou
(Liu et al., 2018), and Beijing in summer (Yan et al.,
2015) but lower than those of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from Singapore (Adam
et al., 2020), PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from Godavari, Nepal, in the pre-monsoon season
(Wu et al., 2019), and smoke particles from biomass burning and coal
combustion (Park and Yu, 2016; Fan et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2020b). Lower
MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of both fractions were observed in the monsoon season
than in the non-monsoon seasons, likely due to the heavy monsoon rains that
effectively remove soluble gases and aerosols (Lawrence and
Lelieveld, 2010) and/or reduce biomass burning activity (levoglucosan level
in Table 1). A previous study reported similar findings in the USA in that
the MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was approximately 3-fold higher in biomass-burning-impacted samples than in non-biomass-burning-impacted samples
(Hecobian et al., 2010). Another study in the central
Tibetan Plateau highlighted the fact that BrC emitted by biomass burning has stronger
light absorption capability than secondary BrC formed in the atmosphere
(Wu et al., 2018). On the Indo-China peninsula, Bangkok receives 99 %
of the fire-derived aerosols from December to April (Lee et al.,
2017), which may explain the high absorption levels in the non-monsoon
seasons.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Chromophores responsible for BrC light absorption</title>
      <p id="d1e2797">EEM analysis enables the probing of the chemical structure of DOM because of
its ability to distinguish among different classes of organic matter
(Wu et al., 2003). Generally, BrC absorption is related to
the chromophores within it and is susceptible to change with variations in
chemical properties, e.g., oxidation level (Mo et al., 2018), degree of
unsaturation (Jiang et al., 2020), molecular weight (Tang et
al., 2020b; Di Lorenzo et al., 2017), functional groups (Q. Chen et
al., 2017), and molecular composition (Song et al., 2019; Lin et al.,
2018). The fluorescence intensity of each EEM component was shown to be
associated with light absorption indices, such as MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and AAE, of
HULIS in controlled crop-straw-combustion experiments (Huo et
al., 2018). As a linear relationship between organic matter concentration
and fluorescence intensity can be assumed for very dilute samples due to the
IFE (Murphy et al., 2013), we have corrected our fluorescence data
for IFE using absorbance to enable “clean” correlation analysis (as shown
in Fig. S13a, b). The linear regression slopes in the scatter plots of
Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> versus WSOC or MSOC could mathematically represent the average
MAE values of WSOC or MSOC at 365 nm, respectively (Fig. S11a, b). The
phenomenon indicates that both fluorescence and Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data point to
similar relationships between sources or chemical processes with organic
matter concentrations, and therefore we attempted to link the fluorescence
results to BrC absorption. It should be noted that light-absorbing
substances in atmospheric particulate matter are not necessarily all
fluorescent, such as nitrophenol compounds, which are a type of BrC commonly
found in the atmospheric particulate matter; however, there is no strong
fluorescence signal with which to scan the nitrophenol standards
(Chen et al., 2019a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2829">Linear correlation analysis between modeling Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using
multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis and measured Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC, <bold>a</bold>) and methanol-soluble organic carbon (MSOC, <bold>b</bold>) in aerosols samples from Bangkok in Thailand during 2016–2017, respectively. Note that the fluorescent intensities of parallel factor (PARAFAC) model results (fluorescent components) were used as variables in MLR analysis.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11337/2021/acp-21-11337-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2862">In order to evaluate the light absorption from different fluorescent
chromophores, we used MLR to explore the relationship between the
fluorescence intensities of chromophores and Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this study,
light absorption properties were treated as the dependent variables, and the
fluorescence was an independent variable. During MLR, insignificant
fluorescent components were excluded from the regression using a stepwise
screening process to avoid overfitting (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inclusion</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">elimination</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10). The MLR statistical metrics are
listed in Tables S4 and S5. For the independent variables with significant
correlations with the dependent variable (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05) or with positive
contributions to the independence, Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, they will be retained in the
statistical model as the efficiency factors to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, for the
WSOC fraction, a revised model (regression 3) equation was used with an
adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.995. The final optimized equations were Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.765 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> P4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.051 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> P2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.091 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> P7 for
the WSOC fraction and Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.238 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C4 for the MSOC
fraction (Table S5). The model errors for water-soluble and methanol-soluble
Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.5 %–64 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>34 %–58 %, respectively.
The predicted Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values fit the measured values well (Fig. 5; slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.99 and 0.95, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.99 and 0.94 for WSOC and MSOC,
respectively).</p>
      <p id="d1e3103">For water-soluble BrC, the P4 component had the largest coefficient with
Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was much higher than those for P2 and P7. The C4
component had the largest coefficient with Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for methanol-soluble
BrC. These results indicate that the light absorption by BrC is more
dependent on chromophores with longer emission wavelengths (P4 and C4).
These characteristics also indicate that the strongly absorbing substances
in BrC probably originate from large conjugated electron functional groups
or include donor and acceptor molecules for charge–transfer interactions
(Del Vecchio and Blough, 2004; Cory and McKnight, 2005). Kellerman et
al. (2015) reported that these components are highly aromatic and
oxygen-rich with a high apparent molecular weight. These important findings
highlight the fact that larger chromophores may be the most persistent BrC species in
the atmosphere and hence exert the greatest influence for perturbing the
global radiative balance.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3126">The time series of the P4 component of the WSOC <bold>(a)</bold> and C4 of the MSOC <bold>(b)</bold> in TSP samples over Bangkok in Thailand contributed by each factor resolved by positive matrix factorization.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/11337/2021/acp-21-11337-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page11347?><p id="d1e3141">To further interpret the BrC source profiles as real-world TSP sources, we
examined 84 (minus one missing value) TSP samples from Bangkok using the US
EPA PMF5.0 model. All samples were merged together to form an 84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 dataset (84 samples with 30 species). The initial data of positive matrix
factorization input were from our previous study (J. Wang et al.,
2020). We further added Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of WSOC and MSOC, as well as the
fluorescence intensities (in RU) of P2, P4, P7, and C4 components to the
model. A seven-factor solution was achieved that provided the most
physically reasonable source profiles (Fig. S14), including ship emissions,
secondary sulfate, dust, land fossil-fuel combustion, sea salt, biomass
burning, and industrial emissions, consistent with our previous study
(J. Wang et al., 2020). Figure S15 shows the contributions of the
above sources to light absorption at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 365 nm, which represent
the fraction of BrC for each factor. Biomass burning was found to be the
main source of BrC over Bangkok: 58 % and 74 % for water-soluble and
methanol-soluble BrC, respectively. These were comparable to previous
observations using a similar approach in Xi'an (55 %) (C. Wu et al.,
2020). The time series of Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of WSOC and MSOC contributed by
factors shows that the high biomass burning contribution is related to the higher
local fire spots (i.e., pre-hot season, hot season, and cool season) and/or
air mass from the continent (Figs. S16–S17). Jiang et al. (2021) observed
increases in biomass burning contributions to BrC absorption during the
winter period that was dominant in continental-origin air masses.
Furthermore, the P4 and C4 components, which were more closely associated
with Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, could be mostly attributed to biomass burning (54 % and
70 %, respectively) as shown in Fig. 6. Our previous study showed that
biomass burning accounted for a considerably large portion (mean: 26 %) of
the TSP mass concentration in the same samples (J. Wang et al.,
2020). This result suggests that biomass burning makes a significant
contribution to not only particulate matter but also BrC light absorption.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3202">This study presents a comprehensive analysis of water- and methanol-soluble
chromophores in aerosol samples over Bangkok in Thailand during 2016–2017.
EEM combined with PARAFAC analysis showed that the identified fluorescent
components were humic-like and protein-like substances but with different
patterns in the WSOC and MSOC, indicating different chemical compositions.
By adding three-source fluorescence into the original PARAFAC model, we
found that chromophores with longer emission wavelengths in the atmosphere
may be due to atmospheric chemical reactions or “aging” by both bleaching
the source chromophores and producing new chromophores. We also suggest that
caution is required when using fluorescence indices to appoint the source of
atmospheric chromophores. In addition, more water-soluble BrC with stronger
light absorption capability could be extracted with ultrapure deionized
water over Bangkok (0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 vs. 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C), and both water-soluble and methanol-soluble BrC exhibited high
light absorption in non-monsoon seasons due to the influence of biomass
burning. The MLR analysis showed that the light absorption of BrC at
365 nm in the two fractions was significantly dependent on the special
fluorescent chromophores with longer emission wavelengths that are generally
highly aromatic and oxygen-rich with a high apparent molecular weight.
Positive matrix factorization model results further showed that biomass
burning was the main contributor of these fluorescent chromophores (up to
50 %). In summary, this study provides new insight into BrC absorption
and sources, which may promote the application of EEM spectroscopy to
predict and model the light absorption of BrC in the atmosphere.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3246">The data used in this study are available in the Harvard  Dataverse (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GQ04LG" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7910/DVN/GQ04LG</ext-link>,
Tang, 2021).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3252">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11337-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11337-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3261">JiaoT, GaZ, JL, and GuZ designed the experiment. JiaoT and JW carried out the measurements and analyzed the data. JW and SB organized and performed the samplings. JianT supported the fluorescence
instruments and laboratory. CT and HJ supported the models. JiaoT wrote the
paper. JL, GuZ, YC, YM, BZ, XG, and GaZ reviewed and commented on the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3267">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e3273">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3279">This is contribution no. IS-3042 from GIGCAS.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3284">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42030715, 41430645, and 41773120), the International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. 132744KYSB20170002), the Guangdong Foundation for Program of Science and Technology Research (grant nos. 2017BT01Z134, 2018A030310022, 2019B121205006, and 2020B1212060053), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no. 2020M682937).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3290">This paper was edited by Alex Lee and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Adam, M. G., Chiang, A. W. J., and Balasubramanian, R.: Insights into
characteristics of light absorbing carbonaceous aerosols over an urban
location in Southeast Asia, Environ. Pollut., 257, 113425,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113425" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113425</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alexander, D. T. L., Crozier, P. A., and Anderson, J. R.: Brown carbon
spheres in East Asian outflow and their optical properties, Science, 321,
833–836, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1155296</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andersson, C. A. and Bro, R.: The N-way Toolbox for MATLAB, Chemom. Intell.
Lab. Syst., 52, 1–4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7439(00)00071-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0169-7439(00)00071-x</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page11348?><ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Babar, Z. B., Park, J.-H., and Lim, H.-J.: Influence of NH 3 on secondary
organic aerosols from the ozonolysis and photooxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
in a flow reactor, Atmos. Environ., 164, 71–84,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.034</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bahram, M., Bro, R., Stedmon, C., and Afkhami, A.: Handling of Rayleigh and
Raman scatter for PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence data using interpolation,
J. Chemom., 20, 99–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.978" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cem.978</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Barnard, J. C., Volkamer, R., and Kassianov, E. I.: Estimation of the mass absorption cross section of the organic carbon component of aerosols in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6665–6679, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6665-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-6665-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bianco, A., Minella, M., De Laurentiis, E., Maurino, V., Minero, C., and
Vione, D.: Photochemical generation of photoactive compounds with
fulvic-like and humic-like fluorescence in aqueous solution, Chemosphere,
111, 529–536, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.035</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bianco, A., Passananti, M., Deguillaume, L., Mailhot, G., and Brigante, M.:
Tryptophan and tryptophan-like substances in cloud water: Occurrence and
photochemical fate, Atmos. Environ., 137, 53–61,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.034</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bikkina, P., Bikkina, S., Kawamura, K., Sudheer, A. K., Mahesh, G., and
Kumar, S. K.: Evidence for brown carbon absorption over the Bay of Bengal
during the southwest monsoon season: a possible oceanic source, Environ. Sci.
Process Impacts, 22, 1743–1758, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d0em00111b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/d0em00111b</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Birdwell, J. E. and Engel, A. S.: Characterization of dissolved organic
matter in cave and spring waters using UV–Vis absorbance and fluorescence
spectroscopy, Org. Geochem., 41, 270–280,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.11.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.11.002</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Birdwell, J. E. and Valsaraj, K. T.: Characterization of dissolved organic
matter in fogwater by excitation–emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 3246–3253,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.055</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, H., Liao, Z. L., Gu, X. Y., Xie, J. Q., Li, H. Z., and Zhang, J.:
Anthropogenic Influences of Paved Runoff and Sanitary Sewage on the
Dissolved Organic Matter Quality of Wet Weather Overflows: An
Excitation-Emission Matrix Parallel Factor Analysis Assessment, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 1157–1167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03727</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Ikemori, F., and Mochida, M.: Light Absorption and
Excitation-Emission Fluorescence of Urban Organic Aerosol Components and
Their Relationship to Chemical Structure, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
10859–10868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b02541</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Miyazaki, Y., Kawamura, K., Matsumoto, K., Coburn, S., Volkamer,
R., Iwamoto, Y., Kagami, S., Deng, Y., Ogawa, S., Ramasamy, S., Kato, S.,
Ida, A., Kajii, Y., and Mochida, M.: Characterization of Chromophoric
Water-Soluble Organic Matter in Urban, Forest, and Marine Aerosols by
HR-ToF-AMS Analysis and Excitation-Emission Matrix Spectroscopy, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 50, 10351–10360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01643" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b01643</ext-link>,
2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Ikemori, F., Nakamura, Y., Vodicka, P., Kawamura, K., and Mochida,
M.: Structural and Light-Absorption Characteristics of Complex
Water-Insoluble Organic Mixtures in Urban Submicrometer Aerosols, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 8293–8303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01630" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b01630</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Mu, Z., Song, W., Wang, Y., Yang, Z., Zhang, L., and Zhang, Y. L.:
Size-Resolved Characterization of the Chromophores in Atmospheric
Particulate Matter From a Typical Coal-Burning City in China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 124, 10546–10563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031149" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019jd031149</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Wang, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Li, Y., and Han, Y.: Oxidative
Potential of Water-Soluble Matter Associated with Chromophoric Substances in
PM2.5 over Xi'an, China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 8574–8584,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01976" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b01976</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, W., Westerhoff, P., Leenheer, J. A., and Booksh, K.: Fluorescence
excitation - Emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for
dissolved organic matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 5701–5710,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es034354c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es034354c</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Ge, X., Chen, H., Xie, X., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Ye, Z., Bao, M.,
Zhang, Y., and Chen, M.: Seasonal light absorption properties of
water-soluble brown carbon in atmospheric fine particles in Nanjing, China,
Atmos. Environ., 187, 230–240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.002</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cory, R. M. and McKnight, D. M.: Fluorescence spectroscopy reveals
ubiquitous presence of oxidized and reduced quinones in dissolved organic
matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8142–8149,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0506962" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0506962</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dasari, S., Andersson, A., Bikkina, S., Holmstrand, H., Budhavant, K.,
Satheesh, S., Asmi, E., Kesti, J., Backman, J., Salam, A., Bisht, D. S.,
Tiwari, S., Hameed, Z., and Gustafsson, O.: Photochemical degradation
affects the light absorption of water-soluble brown carbon in the South
Asian outflow, Sci. Adv., 5, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aau8066</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Del Vecchio, R. and Blough, N. V.: On the Origin of the Optical Properties
of Humic Substances, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 3885–3891,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es049912h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es049912h</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Di Lorenzo, R. A., Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Guo, H., Xu, L., Ng,
N. L., Weber, R. J., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E., and Young, C. J.:
Molecular-Size-Separated Brown Carbon Absorption for Biomass-Burning Aerosol
at Multiple Field Sites, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 3128–3137,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b06160</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fan, X., Li, M., Cao, T., Cheng, C., Li, F., Xie, Y., Wei, S., Song, J., and
Peng, P. a.: Optical properties and oxidative potential of water- and
alkaline-soluble brown carbon in smoke particles emitted from laboratory
simulated biomass burning, Atmos. Environ., 194, 48–57,
https://10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.025, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fan, X., Cao, T., Yu, X., Wang, Y., Xiao, X., Li, F., Xie, Y., Ji, W., Song, J., and Peng, P.: The evolutionary behavior of chromophoric brown carbon during ozone aging of fine particles from biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4593–4605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4593-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4593-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, P., Kawamura, K., Chen, J., Qin, M., Ren, L., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Barrie,
L. A., Tachibana, E., Ding, A., and Yamashita, Y.: Fluorescent water-soluble
organic aerosols in the High Arctic atmosphere, Sci. Rep., 5, 9845,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep09845</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page11349?><ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fujii, Y., Iriana, W., Oda, M., Puriwigati, A., Tohno, S., Lestari, P.,
Mizohata, A., and Huboyo, H. S.: Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols
emitted from peatland fire in Riau, Sumatra, Indonesia, Atmos. Environ., 87,
164–169, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.037</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gabor, R. S., Baker, A., McKnight, D. M., and Miller, M. P.: Fluorescence
Indices and Their Interpretation, in: Aquatic Organic Matter Fluorescence,
edited by: Baker, A., Reynolds, D. M., Lead, J., Coble, P. G., and Spencer,
R. G. M., Cambridge Environmental Chemistry Series, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, UK, 303–338, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gao, Y. and Zhang, Y.: Formation and photochemical investigation of brown
carbon by hydroxyacetone reactions with glycine and ammonium sulfate, RSC
Advances, 8, 20719–20725, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra02019a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c8ra02019a</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Graber, E. R. and Rudich, Y.: Atmospheric HULIS: How humic-like are they? A comprehensive and critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 729–753, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-729-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gu, Q. and Kenny, J. E.: Improvement of Inner Filter Effect Correction
Based on Determination of Effective Geometric Parameters Using a
Conventional Fluorimeter, Anal. Chem., 81, 420–426,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac801676j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac801676j</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Han, H., Kim, G., Seo, H., Shin, K.-H., and Lee, D.-H.: Significant seasonal changes in optical properties of brown carbon in the midlatitude atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2709–2718, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2709-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-2709-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hawkes, J. A., Patriarca, C., Sjöberg, P. J. R., Tranvik, L. J., and
Bergquist, J.: Extreme isomeric complexity of dissolved organic matter found
across aquatic environments, Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett., 3, 21–30,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lol2.10064</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hecobian, A., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Frank, N., Edgerton, E. S., and Weber, R. J.: Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol material and the light-absorption characteristics of aqueous extracts measured over the Southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5965–5977, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Guyon, P., Kiss, G., Schmid, O., Frank, G. P., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Optical properties of humic-like substances (HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3563–3570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hopkins, R. J., Lewis, K., Desyaterik, Y., Wang, Z., Tivanski, A. V.,
Arnott, W. P., Laskin, A., and Gilles, M. K.: Correlations between optical,
chemical and physical properties of biomass burn aerosols, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L18806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl030502</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, K., Fu, J. S., Hsu, N. C., Gao, Y., Dong, X., Tsay, S.-C., and Lam,
Y. F.: Impact assessment of biomass burning on air quality in Southeast and
East Asia during BASE-ASIA, Atmos. Environ., 78, 291–302,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.048</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huguet, A., Vacher, L., Relexans, S., Saubusse, S., Froidefond, J. M., and
Parlanti, E.: Properties of fluorescent dissolved organic matter in the
Gironde Estuary, Org. Geochem., 40, 706–719,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.03.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.03.002</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huo, Y., Li, M., Jiang, M., and Qi, W.: Light absorption properties of HULIS
in primary particulate matter produced by crop straw combustion under
different moisture contents and stacking modes, Atmos. Environ., 191,
490–499, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.08.038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.08.038</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ishii, S. K. and Boyer, T. H.: Behavior of reoccurring PARAFAC components
in fluorescent dissolved organic matter in natural and engineered systems: a
critical review, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 2006–2017,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es2043504" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es2043504</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiang, H., Li, J., Chen, D., Tang, J., Cheng, Z., Mo, Y., Su, T., Tian, C.,
Jiang, B., Liao, Y., and Zhang, G.: Biomass burning organic aerosols
significantly influence the light absorption properties of
polarity-dependent organic compounds in the Pearl River Delta Region, China,
Environ. Int., 144, 106079, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2020.106079</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiang, H., Li, J., Sun, R., Liu, G., Tian, C., Tang, J., Cheng, Z., Zhu, S.,
Zhong, G., Ding, X., and Zhang, G.: Determining the Sources and Transport of
Brown Carbon Using Radionuclide Tracers and Modeling, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD034616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021jd034616" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021jd034616</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kasthuriarachchi, N. Y., Rivellini, L.-H., Chen, X., Li, Y. J., and Lee, A.
K. Y.: Effect of relative humidity on secondary brown carbon formation in
aqueous droplets, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 13207–13216,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01239" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c01239</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kellerman, A. M., Kothawala, D. N., Dittmar, T., and Tranvik, L. J.:
Persistence of dissolved organic matter in lakes related to its molecular
characteristics, Nat. Geosci., 8, 454–452,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2440" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2440</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W. and Thatcher, T. L.: Contribution of organic carbon to wood smoke particulate matter absorption of solar radiation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6067–6072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D21208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd004999</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A., Bahreini, R., Langridge, J. M., Gilman, J. B., and Middlebrook, A. M.: Brown carbon absorption linked to organic mass tracers in biomass burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2415–2422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2415-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2415-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric
brown carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Mass Spectrometry Analysis in
Atmospheric Chemistry, Anal. Chem., 90, 166–189,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04249" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04249</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lawrence, M. G. and Lelieveld, J.: Atmospheric pollutant outflow from southern Asia: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11017–11096, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, H.-H., Bar-Or, R. Z., and Wang, C.: Biomass burning aerosols and the low-visibility events in Southeast Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 965–980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-965-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-965-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, H. J., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Excitation-emission spectra and fluorescence quantum yields for fresh and
aged biogenic secondary organic aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
5763–5770, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400644c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es400644c</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, M., Fan, X., Zhu, M., Zou, C., Song, J., Wei, S., Jia, W., and Peng, P.:
Abundances and light absorption properties of brown carbon emitted from
residential coa<?pagebreak page11350?>l combustion in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 595–603,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05630" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b05630</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A., and Laskin, A.: Revealing Brown
Carbon Chromophores Produced in Reactions of Methylglyoxal with Ammonium
Sulfate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14257–14266,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03608" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b03608</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
and Laskin, A.: Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbon in Biomass
Burning Aerosol Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11815–11824,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Bluvshtein, N., Rudich, Y., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and
Laskin, A.: Molecular Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Inferred from a
Nationwide Biomass Burning Event, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 11561–11570,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02276</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Fleming, L. T., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and Laskin, A.:
Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Atmospheric Brown Carbon by High
Resolution Mass Spectrometry with Electrospray and Atmospheric Pressure
Photoionization, Anal. Chem., 90, 12493–12502,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02177" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02177</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber, R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Mo, Y., Ding, P., Li, J., Shen, C., and Zhang, G.: Dual carbon
isotopes ((14)C and (13)C) and optical properties of WSOC and HULIS-C during
winter in Guangzhou, China, Sci. Total Environ., 633, 1571–1578,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.293" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.293</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Luciani, X., Mounier, S., Redon, R., and Bois, A.: A simple correction
method of inner filter effects affecting FEEM and its application to the
PARAFAC decomposition, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 96, 227–238,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.02.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.02.008</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marrero-Ortiz, W., Hu, M., Du, Z., Ji, Y., Wang, Y., Guo, S., Lin, Y.,
Gomez-Hermandez, M., Peng, J., Li, Y., Secrest, J., Levy Zamora, M., Wang,
Y., An, T., and Zhang, R.: Formation and optical properties of brown carbon
from small alpha-dicarbonyls and amines, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 117–126,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03995" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b03995</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Matos, J. T. V., Freire, S. M. S. C., Duarte, R. M. B. O., and Duarte, A.
C.: Natural organic matter in urban aerosols: Comparison between water and
alkaline soluble components using excitation–emission matrix fluorescence
spectroscopy and multiway data analysis, Atmos. Environ., 102, 1–10,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.042</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mcknight, D. M., Boyer, E. W., Westerhoff, P., Doran, P. T., Kulbe, T., and
Andersen, D. T.: Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic
matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 46, 38–48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2001.46.1.0038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2001.46.1.0038</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mo, Y., Li, J., Jiang, B., Su, T., Geng, X., Liu, J., Jiang, H., Shen, C.,
Ding, P., Zhong, G., Cheng, Z., Liao, Y., Tian, C., Chen, Y., and Zhang, G.:
Sources, compositions, and optical properties of humic-like substances in
Beijing during the 2014 APEC summit: Results from dual carbon isotope and
Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry analyses,
Environ. Pollut., 239, 322–331,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.041</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mo, Y. Z., Li, J., Liu, J. W., Zhong, G. C., Cheng, Z. N., Tian, C. G.,
Chen, Y. J., and Zhang, G.: The influence of solvent and pH on determination
of the light absorption properties of water-soluble brown carbon, Atmos.
Environ., 161, 90–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.037</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mounier, S., Patel, N., Quilici, L., Benaim, J. Y., and Benamou, C.:
Fluorescence 3D de la matière organique dissoute du fleuve amazone:
(Three-dimensional fluorescence of the dissolved organic carbon in the
Amazon river), Water Res., 33, 1523–1533,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00347-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00347-9</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murphy, K. R., Butler, K. D., Spencer, R. G., Stedmon, C. A., Boehme, J. R.,
and Aiken, G. R.: Measurement of dissolved organic matter fluorescence in
aquatic environments: an interlaboratory comparison, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
44, 9405–9412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102362t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es102362t</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murphy, K. R., Stedmon, C. A., Graeber, D., and Bro, R.: Fluorescence
spectroscopy and multi-way techniques. PARAFAC, Anal. Methods, 5, 6557–6566,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41160e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c3ay41160e</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murphy, K. R., Timko, S. A., Gonsior, M., Powers, L. C., Wunsch, U. J., and
Stedmon, C. A.: Photochemistry Illuminates Ubiquitous Organic Matter
Fluorescence Spectra, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 11243–11250,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02648" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b02648</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Park, S. S. and Yu, J.: Chemical and light absorption properties of
humic-like substances from biomass burning emissions under controlled
combustion experiments, Atmos. Environ., 136, 114–122,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.022</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Permadi, D. A., Kim Oanh, N. T., and Vautard, R.: Assessment of emission scenarios for 2030 and impacts of black carbon emission reduction measures on air quality and radiative forcing in Southeast Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3321–3334, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3321-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-3321-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pöhlker, C., Huffman, J. A., and Pöschl, U.: Autofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols – fluorescent biomolecules and potential interferences, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 37–71, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-37-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-37-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Qin, J., Zhang, L., Zhou, X., Duan, J., Mu, S., Xiao, K., Hu, J., and Tan,
J.: Fluorescence fingerprinting properties for exploring water-soluble
organic compounds in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in an industrial city of northwest China,
Atmos. Environ., 184, 203–211,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.049</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ramanathan, V., Li, F., Ramana, M. V., Praveen, P. S., Kim, D., Corrigan, C.
E., Van Nguyen, H., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., and Carmichael, G. R.:
Atmospheric brown clouds: Hemispherical and regional variations in
long-range transport, absorption, and radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D22S21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008124</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>See, S. W., Balasubramanian, R., and Wang, W.: A study of the physical,
chemical, and optical properties of ambient aerosol particles in Southeast
Asia during hazy and nonhazy days, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D10S08,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006180" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006180</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shimabuku, K. K., Kennedy, A. M., Mulhern, R. E., and Summers, R. S.:
Evaluating Activated Carbon Adsorption o<?pagebreak page11351?>f Dissolved Organic Matter and
Micropollutants Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
2676–2684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04911" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b04911</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Song, J., Li, M., Jiang, B., Wei, S., Fan, X., and Peng, P.: Molecular
Characterization of Water-Soluble Humic like Substances in Smoke Particles
Emitted from Combustion of Biomass Materials and Coal Using
Ultrahigh-Resolution Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron
Resonance Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 2575–2585,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06126" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b06126</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Song, J. Z., Li, M. J., Fan, X. J., Zou, C. L., Zhu, M. B., Jiang, B., Yu,
Z. Q., Jia, W. L., Liao, Y. H., and Peng, P. A.: Molecular Characterization
of Water- and Methanol-Soluble Organic Compounds Emitted from Residential
Coal Combustion Using Ultrahigh-Resolution Electrospray Ionization Fourier
Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
53, 13607–13617, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04331" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b04331</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stedmon, C. A. and Markager, S.: Resolving the variability in dissolved
organic matter fluorescence in a temperate estuary and its catchment using
PARAFAC analysis, Limnol. Oceanogr., 50, 686–697,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2005.50.2.0686" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2005.50.2.0686</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tang, J.: Data for TJ, Harvard Dataverse [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GQ04LG" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7910/DVN/GQ04LG</ext-link>, 2021,</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tang, J., Li, J., Mo, Y., Safaei Khorram, M., Chen, Y., Tang, J., Zhang, Y.,
Song, J., and Zhang, G.: Light absorption and emissions inventory of
humic-like substances from simulated rainforest biomass burning in Southeast
Asia, Environ. Pollut., 262, 114266,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114266</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tang, J., Li, J., Su, T., Han, Y., Mo, Y., Jiang, H., Cui, M., Jiang, B., Chen, Y., Tang, J., Song, J., Peng, P., and Zhang, G.: Molecular compositions and optical properties of dissolved brown carbon in biomass burning, coal combustion, and vehicle emission aerosols illuminated by excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2513–2532, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2513-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-2513-2020</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Jiang, H., Jiang, H., Mo, Y., Geng, X., Li, J., Mao, S., Bualert,
S., Ma, S., Li, J., and Zhang, G.: Source apportionment of water-soluble
oxidative potential in ambient total suspended particulate from Bangkok:
Biomass burning versus fossil fuel combustion, Atmos. Environ., 235, 117624,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117624" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117624</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, K., Pang, Y., He, C., Li, P., Xiao, S., Sun, Y., Pan, Q., Zhang, Y.,
Shi, Q., and He, D.: Optical and molecular signatures of dissolved organic
matter in Xiangxi Bay and mainstream of Three Gorges Reservoir, China:
Spatial variations and environmental implications, Sci. Total Environ., 657,
1274–1284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.117</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Hayeck, N., Brüggemann, M., Abis, L., Riva, M., Lu, Y., Wang,
B., Chen, J., George, C., and Wang, L.: Chemical Characteristics and Brown
Carbon Chromophores of Atmospheric Organic Aerosols Over the Yangtze River
Channel: A Cruise Campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032497,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jd032497" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020jd032497</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P. S., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Changes in Light Absorptivity
of Molecular Weight Separated Brown Carbon Due to Photolytic Aging, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 8414–8421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b01739</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, C., Wang, G., Li, J., Li, J., Cao, C., Ge, S., Xie, Y., Chen, J., Li, X., Xue, G., Wang, X., Zhao, Z., and Cao, F.: The characteristics of atmospheric brown carbon in Xi'an, inland China: sources, size distributions and optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2017–2030, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2017-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-2017-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, F. C., Evans, R. D., and Dillon, P. J.: Separation and Characterization
of NOM by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and On-Line
Three-Dimensional Excitation Emission Matrix Fluorescence Detection,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 3687–3693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es020244e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es020244e</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, G., Wan, X., Gao, S., Fu, P., Yin, Y., Li, G., Zhang, G., Kang, S., Ram,
K., and Cong, Z.: Humic-Like Substances (HULIS) in Aerosols of Central
Tibetan Plateau (Nam Co, 4730 m asl): Abundance, Light Absorption
Properties, and Sources, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 7203–7211,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01251" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b01251</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, G., Ram, K., Fu, P., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Stone, E. A.,
Pradhan, B. B., Dangol, P. M., Panday, A. K., Wan, X., Bai, Z., Kang, S.,
Zhang, Q., and Cong, Z.: Water-Soluble Brown Carbon in Atmospheric Aerosols
from Godavari (Nepal), a Regional Representative of South Asia, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 53, 3471–3479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00596" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b00596</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, G., Wan, X., Ram, K., Li, P., Liu, B., Yin, Y., Fu, P., Loewen, M., Gao,
S., Kang, S., Kawamura, K., Wang, Y., and Cong, Z.: Light absorption,
fluorescence properties and sources of brown carbon aerosols in the
Southeast Tibetan Plateau, Environ. Pollut., 257, 113616,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113616" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113616</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, G., Fu, P., Ram, K., Song, J., Chen, Q., Kawamura, K., Wan, X., Kang,
S., Wang, X., Laskin, A., and Cong, Z.: Fluorescence characteristics of
water-soluble organic carbon in atmospheric aerosol, Environ. Pollut., 268,
115906, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115906" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115906</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, M., Chen, X., Holder, A. L., Hays, M. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg,
J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Jaoui, M., and Hannigan, M. P.: Light absorption
of organic carbon and its sources at a southeastern U.S. location in summer,
Environ. Pollut., 244, 38–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.125" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.125</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yan, C., Zheng, M., Sullivan, A. P., Bosch, C., Desyaterik, Y., Andersson,
A., Li, X., Guo, X., Zhou, T., Gustafsson, Ö., and Collett, J. L.:
Chemical characteristics and light-absorbing property of water-soluble
organic carbon in Beijing: Biomass burning contributions, Atmos. Environ.,
121, 4–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yan, C., Zheng, M., Desyaterik, Y., Sullivan, A. P., Wu, Y., and Collett
Jr., J. L.: Molecular Characterization of Water-Soluble Brown Carbon
Chromophores in Beijing, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD032018,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019jd032018</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yan, G. and Kim, G.: Speciation and Sources of Brown Carbon in
Precipitation at Seoul, Korea: Insights from Excitation-Emission Matrix
Spectroscopy and Carbon Isotopic Analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
11580–11587, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02892" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02892</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yue, S., Ren, L., Song, T., Li, L., Xie, Q., Li, W., Kang, M., Zhao, W.,
Wei, L., Ren, H., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Ellam, R. M., Liu, C. Q., Kawamura, K.,
and Fu, P.: Abundance and Diurnal Trends of Fluorescent Bioaerosols in the
Troposphere over Mt<?pagebreak page11352?>. Tai, China, in Spring, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124,
4158–4173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029486" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018jd029486</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, Y., Wen, H., Liu, J., Pu, W., Chen, Q., and Wang, X.: The optical characteristics and sources of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in seasonal snow of northwestern China, The Cryosphere, 13, 157–175, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-157-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-13-157-2019</ext-link>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zsolnay, A., Baigar, E., Jimenez, M., Steinweg, B., and Saccomandi, F.:
Differentiating with fluorescence spectroscopy the sources of dissolved
organic matter in soils subjected to drying, Chemosphere, 38, 45–50,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00166-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00166-0</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Measurement report: Long-emission-wavelength chromophores dominate the light absorption of brown carbon in aerosols over Bangkok: impact from biomass burning</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Chromophores represent an important portion of light-absorbing
species, i.e., brown carbon. Yet knowledge of what and how chromophores
contribute to aerosol light absorption is still sparse. To address this
problem, we examined soluble independent chromophores in a set of year-round
aerosol samples from Bangkok. The water-soluble fluorescent chromophores
identified via excitation–emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy and follow-up
parallel factor analysis could be mainly assigned as humic-like substances
and protein-like substances, which differed in their EEM pattern from that
of the methanol-soluble fraction. The emission wavelength of fluorescent
chromophores in environmental samples tended to increase compared with that
of the primary combustion emission, which could be attributed to secondary
formation or the aging process. Fluorescent indices inferred that these
light-absorbing chromophores were not significantly humified and comprised a
mixture of organic matter of terrestrial and microbial origin, which
exhibited a different characteristic from primary biomass burning and coal-combustion results. A multiple linear regression analysis revealed that
larger fluorescent chromophores that were oxygen-rich and highly aromatic
with high molecular weights were the key contributors of light absorption,
preferably at longer emission wavelengths
(<i>λ</i><sub><mo>max</mo></sub>&thinsp; &gt; &thinsp;500&thinsp;nm). Positive matrix factorization analysis further suggested that up to
50&thinsp;% of these responsible chromophores originated from biomass burning
emissions.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adam, M. G., Chiang, A. W. J., and Balasubramanian, R.: Insights into
characteristics of light absorbing carbonaceous aerosols over an urban
location in Southeast Asia, Environ. Pollut., 257, 113425,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113425" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113425</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alexander, D. T. L., Crozier, P. A., and Anderson, J. R.: Brown carbon
spheres in East Asian outflow and their optical properties, Science, 321,
833–836, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155296</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Andersson, C. A. and Bro, R.: The N-way Toolbox for MATLAB, Chemom. Intell.
Lab. Syst., 52, 1–4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7439(00)00071-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7439(00)00071-x</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Babar, Z. B., Park, J.-H., and Lim, H.-J.: Influence of NH 3 on secondary
organic aerosols from the ozonolysis and photooxidation of <i>α</i>-pinene
in a flow reactor, Atmos. Environ., 164, 71–84,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.034</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bahram, M., Bro, R., Stedmon, C., and Afkhami, A.: Handling of Rayleigh and
Raman scatter for PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence data using interpolation,
J. Chemom., 20, 99–105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.978" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.978</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Barnard, J. C., Volkamer, R., and Kassianov, E. I.: Estimation of the mass absorption cross section of the organic carbon component of aerosols in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6665–6679, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6665-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6665-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bianco, A., Minella, M., De Laurentiis, E., Maurino, V., Minero, C., and
Vione, D.: Photochemical generation of photoactive compounds with
fulvic-like and humic-like fluorescence in aqueous solution, Chemosphere,
111, 529–536, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.035</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bianco, A., Passananti, M., Deguillaume, L., Mailhot, G., and Brigante, M.:
Tryptophan and tryptophan-like substances in cloud water: Occurrence and
photochemical fate, Atmos. Environ., 137, 53–61,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.034</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bikkina, P., Bikkina, S., Kawamura, K., Sudheer, A. K., Mahesh, G., and
Kumar, S. K.: Evidence for brown carbon absorption over the Bay of Bengal
during the southwest monsoon season: a possible oceanic source, Environ. Sci.
Process Impacts, 22, 1743–1758, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d0em00111b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/d0em00111b</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Birdwell, J. E. and Engel, A. S.: Characterization of dissolved organic
matter in cave and spring waters using UV–Vis absorbance and fluorescence
spectroscopy, Org. Geochem., 41, 270–280,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.11.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.11.002</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Birdwell, J. E. and Valsaraj, K. T.: Characterization of dissolved organic
matter in fogwater by excitation–emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 3246–3253,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.055</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, H., Liao, Z. L., Gu, X. Y., Xie, J. Q., Li, H. Z., and Zhang, J.:
Anthropogenic Influences of Paved Runoff and Sanitary Sewage on the
Dissolved Organic Matter Quality of Wet Weather Overflows: An
Excitation-Emission Matrix Parallel Factor Analysis Assessment, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 1157–1167, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03727</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q., Ikemori, F., and Mochida, M.: Light Absorption and
Excitation-Emission Fluorescence of Urban Organic Aerosol Components and
Their Relationship to Chemical Structure, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
10859–10868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02541</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q., Miyazaki, Y., Kawamura, K., Matsumoto, K., Coburn, S., Volkamer,
R., Iwamoto, Y., Kagami, S., Deng, Y., Ogawa, S., Ramasamy, S., Kato, S.,
Ida, A., Kajii, Y., and Mochida, M.: Characterization of Chromophoric
Water-Soluble Organic Matter in Urban, Forest, and Marine Aerosols by
HR-ToF-AMS Analysis and Excitation-Emission Matrix Spectroscopy, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 50, 10351–10360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01643" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01643</a>,
2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q., Ikemori, F., Nakamura, Y., Vodicka, P., Kawamura, K., and Mochida,
M.: Structural and Light-Absorption Characteristics of Complex
Water-Insoluble Organic Mixtures in Urban Submicrometer Aerosols, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 8293–8303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01630" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01630</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q., Mu, Z., Song, W., Wang, Y., Yang, Z., Zhang, L., and Zhang, Y. L.:
Size-Resolved Characterization of the Chromophores in Atmospheric
Particulate Matter From a Typical Coal-Burning City in China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 124, 10546–10563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031149" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031149</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q., Wang, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Li, Y., and Han, Y.: Oxidative
Potential of Water-Soluble Matter Associated with Chromophoric Substances in
PM2.5 over Xi'an, China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 8574–8584,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01976" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01976</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, W., Westerhoff, P., Leenheer, J. A., and Booksh, K.: Fluorescence
excitation - Emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for
dissolved organic matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 5701–5710,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es034354c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es034354c</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Ge, X., Chen, H., Xie, X., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Ye, Z., Bao, M.,
Zhang, Y., and Chen, M.: Seasonal light absorption properties of
water-soluble brown carbon in atmospheric fine particles in Nanjing, China,
Atmos. Environ., 187, 230–240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.002</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Cory, R. M. and McKnight, D. M.: Fluorescence spectroscopy reveals
ubiquitous presence of oxidized and reduced quinones in dissolved organic
matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8142–8149,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0506962" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0506962</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Dasari, S., Andersson, A., Bikkina, S., Holmstrand, H., Budhavant, K.,
Satheesh, S., Asmi, E., Kesti, J., Backman, J., Salam, A., Bisht, D. S.,
Tiwari, S., Hameed, Z., and Gustafsson, O.: Photochemical degradation
affects the light absorption of water-soluble brown carbon in the South
Asian outflow, Sci. Adv., 5, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8066</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Del Vecchio, R. and Blough, N. V.: On the Origin of the Optical Properties
of Humic Substances, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 3885–3891,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es049912h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es049912h</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Di Lorenzo, R. A., Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Guo, H., Xu, L., Ng,
N. L., Weber, R. J., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E., and Young, C. J.:
Molecular-Size-Separated Brown Carbon Absorption for Biomass-Burning Aerosol
at Multiple Field Sites, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 3128–3137,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06160</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, X., Li, M., Cao, T., Cheng, C., Li, F., Xie, Y., Wei, S., Song, J., and
Peng, P. a.: Optical properties and oxidative potential of water- and
alkaline-soluble brown carbon in smoke particles emitted from laboratory
simulated biomass burning, Atmos. Environ., 194, 48–57,
https://10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.025, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, X., Cao, T., Yu, X., Wang, Y., Xiao, X., Li, F., Xie, Y., Ji, W., Song, J., and Peng, P.: The evolutionary behavior of chromophoric brown carbon during ozone aging of fine particles from biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4593–4605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4593-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4593-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, P., Kawamura, K., Chen, J., Qin, M., Ren, L., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Barrie,
L. A., Tachibana, E., Ding, A., and Yamashita, Y.: Fluorescent water-soluble
organic aerosols in the High Arctic atmosphere, Sci. Rep., 5, 9845,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09845</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Fujii, Y., Iriana, W., Oda, M., Puriwigati, A., Tohno, S., Lestari, P.,
Mizohata, A., and Huboyo, H. S.: Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols
emitted from peatland fire in Riau, Sumatra, Indonesia, Atmos. Environ., 87,
164–169, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.037</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Gabor, R. S., Baker, A., McKnight, D. M., and Miller, M. P.: Fluorescence
Indices and Their Interpretation, in: Aquatic Organic Matter Fluorescence,
edited by: Baker, A., Reynolds, D. M., Lead, J., Coble, P. G., and Spencer,
R. G. M., Cambridge Environmental Chemistry Series, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, UK, 303–338, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, Y. and Zhang, Y.: Formation and photochemical investigation of brown
carbon by hydroxyacetone reactions with glycine and ammonium sulfate, RSC
Advances, 8, 20719–20725, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra02019a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra02019a</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Graber, E. R. and Rudich, Y.: Atmospheric HULIS: How humic-like are they? A comprehensive and critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 729–753, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Gu, Q. and Kenny, J. E.: Improvement of Inner Filter Effect Correction
Based on Determination of Effective Geometric Parameters Using a
Conventional Fluorimeter, Anal. Chem., 81, 420–426,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac801676j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac801676j</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Han, H., Kim, G., Seo, H., Shin, K.-H., and Lee, D.-H.: Significant seasonal changes in optical properties of brown carbon in the midlatitude atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2709–2718, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2709-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2709-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hawkes, J. A., Patriarca, C., Sjöberg, P. J. R., Tranvik, L. J., and
Bergquist, J.: Extreme isomeric complexity of dissolved organic matter found
across aquatic environments, Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett., 3, 21–30,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10064</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Hecobian, A., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Frank, N., Edgerton, E. S., and Weber, R. J.: Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol material and the light-absorption characteristics of aqueous extracts measured over the Southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5965–5977, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Guyon, P., Kiss, G., Schmid, O., Frank, G. P., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Optical properties of humic-like substances (HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3563–3570, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Hopkins, R. J., Lewis, K., Desyaterik, Y., Wang, Z., Tivanski, A. V.,
Arnott, W. P., Laskin, A., and Gilles, M. K.: Correlations between optical,
chemical and physical properties of biomass burn aerosols, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L18806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030502</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, K., Fu, J. S., Hsu, N. C., Gao, Y., Dong, X., Tsay, S.-C., and Lam,
Y. F.: Impact assessment of biomass burning on air quality in Southeast and
East Asia during BASE-ASIA, Atmos. Environ., 78, 291–302,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.048</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Huguet, A., Vacher, L., Relexans, S., Saubusse, S., Froidefond, J. M., and
Parlanti, E.: Properties of fluorescent dissolved organic matter in the
Gironde Estuary, Org. Geochem., 40, 706–719,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.03.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.03.002</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Huo, Y., Li, M., Jiang, M., and Qi, W.: Light absorption properties of HULIS
in primary particulate matter produced by crop straw combustion under
different moisture contents and stacking modes, Atmos. Environ., 191,
490–499, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.08.038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.08.038</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Ishii, S. K. and Boyer, T. H.: Behavior of reoccurring PARAFAC components
in fluorescent dissolved organic matter in natural and engineered systems: a
critical review, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 2006–2017,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es2043504" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es2043504</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, H., Li, J., Chen, D., Tang, J., Cheng, Z., Mo, Y., Su, T., Tian, C.,
Jiang, B., Liao, Y., and Zhang, G.: Biomass burning organic aerosols
significantly influence the light absorption properties of
polarity-dependent organic compounds in the Pearl River Delta Region, China,
Environ. Int., 144, 106079, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106079</a>,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, H., Li, J., Sun, R., Liu, G., Tian, C., Tang, J., Cheng, Z., Zhu, S.,
Zhong, G., Ding, X., and Zhang, G.: Determining the Sources and Transport of
Brown Carbon Using Radionuclide Tracers and Modeling, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD034616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021jd034616" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021jd034616</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Kasthuriarachchi, N. Y., Rivellini, L.-H., Chen, X., Li, Y. J., and Lee, A.
K. Y.: Effect of relative humidity on secondary brown carbon formation in
aqueous droplets, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 13207–13216,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01239" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01239</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Kellerman, A. M., Kothawala, D. N., Dittmar, T., and Tranvik, L. J.:
Persistence of dissolved organic matter in lakes related to its molecular
characteristics, Nat. Geosci., 8, 454–452,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2440" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2440</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchstetter, T. W. and Thatcher, T. L.: Contribution of organic carbon to wood smoke particulate matter absorption of solar radiation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6067–6072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D21208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004999" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004999</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A., Bahreini, R., Langridge, J. M., Gilman, J. B., and Middlebrook, A. M.: Brown carbon absorption linked to organic mass tracers in biomass burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2415–2422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2415-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2415-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric
brown carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Mass Spectrometry Analysis in
Atmospheric Chemistry, Anal. Chem., 90, 166–189,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04249" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04249</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Lawrence, M. G. and Lelieveld, J.: Atmospheric pollutant outflow from southern Asia: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11017–11096, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, H.-H., Bar-Or, R. Z., and Wang, C.: Biomass burning aerosols and the low-visibility events in Southeast Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 965–980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-965-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-965-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, H. J., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Excitation-emission spectra and fluorescence quantum yields for fresh and
aged biogenic secondary organic aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
5763–5770, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400644c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es400644c</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Li, M., Fan, X., Zhu, M., Zou, C., Song, J., Wei, S., Jia, W., and Peng, P.:
Abundances and light absorption properties of brown carbon emitted from
residential coal combustion in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 595–603,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05630" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05630</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A., and Laskin, A.: Revealing Brown
Carbon Chromophores Produced in Reactions of Methylglyoxal with Ammonium
Sulfate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14257–14266,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03608" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03608</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
and Laskin, A.: Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbon in Biomass
Burning Aerosol Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11815–11824,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Bluvshtein, N., Rudich, Y., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and
Laskin, A.: Molecular Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Inferred from a
Nationwide Biomass Burning Event, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 11561–11570,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Fleming, L. T., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and Laskin, A.:
Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Atmospheric Brown Carbon by High
Resolution Mass Spectrometry with Electrospray and Atmospheric Pressure
Photoionization, Anal. Chem., 90, 12493–12502,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02177" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02177</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber, R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Mo, Y., Ding, P., Li, J., Shen, C., and Zhang, G.: Dual carbon
isotopes ((14)C and (13)C) and optical properties of WSOC and HULIS-C during
winter in Guangzhou, China, Sci. Total Environ., 633, 1571–1578,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.293" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.293</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Luciani, X., Mounier, S., Redon, R., and Bois, A.: A simple correction
method of inner filter effects affecting FEEM and its application to the
PARAFAC decomposition, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 96, 227–238,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.02.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.02.008</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Marrero-Ortiz, W., Hu, M., Du, Z., Ji, Y., Wang, Y., Guo, S., Lin, Y.,
Gomez-Hermandez, M., Peng, J., Li, Y., Secrest, J., Levy Zamora, M., Wang,
Y., An, T., and Zhang, R.: Formation and optical properties of brown carbon
from small alpha-dicarbonyls and amines, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 117–126,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03995" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03995</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Matos, J. T. V., Freire, S. M. S. C., Duarte, R. M. B. O., and Duarte, A.
C.: Natural organic matter in urban aerosols: Comparison between water and
alkaline soluble components using excitation–emission matrix fluorescence
spectroscopy and multiway data analysis, Atmos. Environ., 102, 1–10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.042</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Mcknight, D. M., Boyer, E. W., Westerhoff, P., Doran, P. T., Kulbe, T., and
Andersen, D. T.: Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic
matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 46, 38–48, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2001.46.1.0038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2001.46.1.0038</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Mo, Y., Li, J., Jiang, B., Su, T., Geng, X., Liu, J., Jiang, H., Shen, C.,
Ding, P., Zhong, G., Cheng, Z., Liao, Y., Tian, C., Chen, Y., and Zhang, G.:
Sources, compositions, and optical properties of humic-like substances in
Beijing during the 2014 APEC summit: Results from dual carbon isotope and
Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry analyses,
Environ. Pollut., 239, 322–331,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.041</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Mo, Y. Z., Li, J., Liu, J. W., Zhong, G. C., Cheng, Z. N., Tian, C. G.,
Chen, Y. J., and Zhang, G.: The influence of solvent and pH on determination
of the light absorption properties of water-soluble brown carbon, Atmos.
Environ., 161, 90–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.037</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Mounier, S., Patel, N., Quilici, L., Benaim, J. Y., and Benamou, C.:
Fluorescence 3D de la matière organique dissoute du fleuve amazone:
(Three-dimensional fluorescence of the dissolved organic carbon in the
Amazon river), Water Res., 33, 1523–1533,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00347-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00347-9</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, K. R., Butler, K. D., Spencer, R. G., Stedmon, C. A., Boehme, J. R.,
and Aiken, G. R.: Measurement of dissolved organic matter fluorescence in
aquatic environments: an interlaboratory comparison, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
44, 9405–9412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102362t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es102362t</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, K. R., Stedmon, C. A., Graeber, D., and Bro, R.: Fluorescence
spectroscopy and multi-way techniques. PARAFAC, Anal. Methods, 5, 6557–6566,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41160e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41160e</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, K. R., Timko, S. A., Gonsior, M., Powers, L. C., Wunsch, U. J., and
Stedmon, C. A.: Photochemistry Illuminates Ubiquitous Organic Matter
Fluorescence Spectra, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 11243–11250,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02648" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02648</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Park, S. S. and Yu, J.: Chemical and light absorption properties of
humic-like substances from biomass burning emissions under controlled
combustion experiments, Atmos. Environ., 136, 114–122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.022</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Permadi, D. A., Kim Oanh, N. T., and Vautard, R.: Assessment of emission scenarios for 2030 and impacts of black carbon emission reduction measures on air quality and radiative forcing in Southeast Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3321–3334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3321-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3321-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Pöhlker, C., Huffman, J. A., and Pöschl, U.: Autofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols – fluorescent biomolecules and potential interferences, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 37–71, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-37-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-37-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, J., Zhang, L., Zhou, X., Duan, J., Mu, S., Xiao, K., Hu, J., and Tan,
J.: Fluorescence fingerprinting properties for exploring water-soluble
organic compounds in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in an industrial city of northwest China,
Atmos. Environ., 184, 203–211,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.049</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V., Li, F., Ramana, M. V., Praveen, P. S., Kim, D., Corrigan, C.
E., Van Nguyen, H., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., and Carmichael, G. R.:
Atmospheric brown clouds: Hemispherical and regional variations in
long-range transport, absorption, and radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D22S21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008124" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008124</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
See, S. W., Balasubramanian, R., and Wang, W.: A study of the physical,
chemical, and optical properties of ambient aerosol particles in Southeast
Asia during hazy and nonhazy days, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D10S08,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006180" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006180</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Shimabuku, K. K., Kennedy, A. M., Mulhern, R. E., and Summers, R. S.:
Evaluating Activated Carbon Adsorption of Dissolved Organic Matter and
Micropollutants Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
2676–2684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04911" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04911</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Song, J., Li, M., Jiang, B., Wei, S., Fan, X., and Peng, P.: Molecular
Characterization of Water-Soluble Humic like Substances in Smoke Particles
Emitted from Combustion of Biomass Materials and Coal Using
Ultrahigh-Resolution Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron
Resonance Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 2575–2585,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06126" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06126</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Song, J. Z., Li, M. J., Fan, X. J., Zou, C. L., Zhu, M. B., Jiang, B., Yu,
Z. Q., Jia, W. L., Liao, Y. H., and Peng, P. A.: Molecular Characterization
of Water- and Methanol-Soluble Organic Compounds Emitted from Residential
Coal Combustion Using Ultrahigh-Resolution Electrospray Ionization Fourier
Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
53, 13607–13617, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04331" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04331</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Stedmon, C. A. and Markager, S.: Resolving the variability in dissolved
organic matter fluorescence in a temperate estuary and its catchment using
PARAFAC analysis, Limnol. Oceanogr., 50, 686–697,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2005.50.2.0686" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2005.50.2.0686</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, J.: Data for TJ, Harvard Dataverse [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GQ04LG" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GQ04LG</a>, 2021,
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, J., Li, J., Mo, Y., Safaei Khorram, M., Chen, Y., Tang, J., Zhang, Y.,
Song, J., and Zhang, G.: Light absorption and emissions inventory of
humic-like substances from simulated rainforest biomass burning in Southeast
Asia, Environ. Pollut., 262, 114266,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114266</a>, 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, J., Li, J., Su, T., Han, Y., Mo, Y., Jiang, H., Cui, M., Jiang, B., Chen, Y., Tang, J., Song, J., Peng, P., and Zhang, G.: Molecular compositions and optical properties of dissolved brown carbon in biomass burning, coal combustion, and vehicle emission aerosols illuminated by excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2513–2532, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2513-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2513-2020</a>, 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Jiang, H., Jiang, H., Mo, Y., Geng, X., Li, J., Mao, S., Bualert,
S., Ma, S., Li, J., and Zhang, G.: Source apportionment of water-soluble
oxidative potential in ambient total suspended particulate from Bangkok:
Biomass burning versus fossil fuel combustion, Atmos. Environ., 235, 117624,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117624" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117624</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K., Pang, Y., He, C., Li, P., Xiao, S., Sun, Y., Pan, Q., Zhang, Y.,
Shi, Q., and He, D.: Optical and molecular signatures of dissolved organic
matter in Xiangxi Bay and mainstream of Three Gorges Reservoir, China:
Spatial variations and environmental implications, Sci. Total Environ., 657,
1274–1284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.117</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Hayeck, N., Brüggemann, M., Abis, L., Riva, M., Lu, Y., Wang,
B., Chen, J., George, C., and Wang, L.: Chemical Characteristics and Brown
Carbon Chromophores of Atmospheric Organic Aerosols Over the Yangtze River
Channel: A Cruise Campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032497,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jd032497" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jd032497</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Wong, J. P. S., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Changes in Light Absorptivity
of Molecular Weight Separated Brown Carbon Due to Photolytic Aging, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 8414–8421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01739" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01739</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, C., Wang, G., Li, J., Li, J., Cao, C., Ge, S., Xie, Y., Chen, J., Li, X., Xue, G., Wang, X., Zhao, Z., and Cao, F.: The characteristics of atmospheric brown carbon in Xi'an, inland China: sources, size distributions and optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2017–2030, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2017-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2017-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, F. C., Evans, R. D., and Dillon, P. J.: Separation and Characterization
of NOM by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and On-Line
Three-Dimensional Excitation Emission Matrix Fluorescence Detection,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 3687–3693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es020244e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es020244e</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, G., Wan, X., Gao, S., Fu, P., Yin, Y., Li, G., Zhang, G., Kang, S., Ram,
K., and Cong, Z.: Humic-Like Substances (HULIS) in Aerosols of Central
Tibetan Plateau (Nam Co, 4730&thinsp;m asl): Abundance, Light Absorption
Properties, and Sources, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 7203–7211,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01251" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01251</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, G., Ram, K., Fu, P., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Stone, E. A.,
Pradhan, B. B., Dangol, P. M., Panday, A. K., Wan, X., Bai, Z., Kang, S.,
Zhang, Q., and Cong, Z.: Water-Soluble Brown Carbon in Atmospheric Aerosols
from Godavari (Nepal), a Regional Representative of South Asia, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 53, 3471–3479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00596" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00596</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, G., Wan, X., Ram, K., Li, P., Liu, B., Yin, Y., Fu, P., Loewen, M., Gao,
S., Kang, S., Kawamura, K., Wang, Y., and Cong, Z.: Light absorption,
fluorescence properties and sources of brown carbon aerosols in the
Southeast Tibetan Plateau, Environ. Pollut., 257, 113616,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113616" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113616</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, G., Fu, P., Ram, K., Song, J., Chen, Q., Kawamura, K., Wan, X., Kang,
S., Wang, X., Laskin, A., and Cong, Z.: Fluorescence characteristics of
water-soluble organic carbon in atmospheric aerosol, Environ. Pollut., 268,
115906, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115906" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115906</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, M., Chen, X., Holder, A. L., Hays, M. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg,
J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Jaoui, M., and Hannigan, M. P.: Light absorption
of organic carbon and its sources at a southeastern U.S. location in summer,
Environ. Pollut., 244, 38–46, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.125" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.125</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, C., Zheng, M., Sullivan, A. P., Bosch, C., Desyaterik, Y., Andersson,
A., Li, X., Guo, X., Zhou, T., Gustafsson, Ö., and Collett, J. L.:
Chemical characteristics and light-absorbing property of water-soluble
organic carbon in Beijing: Biomass burning contributions, Atmos. Environ.,
121, 4–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.005</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, C., Zheng, M., Desyaterik, Y., Sullivan, A. P., Wu, Y., and Collett
Jr., J. L.: Molecular Characterization of Water-Soluble Brown Carbon
Chromophores in Beijing, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD032018,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032018</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, G. and Kim, G.: Speciation and Sources of Brown Carbon in
Precipitation at Seoul, Korea: Insights from Excitation-Emission Matrix
Spectroscopy and Carbon Isotopic Analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
11580–11587, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02892" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02892</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Yue, S., Ren, L., Song, T., Li, L., Xie, Q., Li, W., Kang, M., Zhao, W.,
Wei, L., Ren, H., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Ellam, R. M., Liu, C. Q., Kawamura, K.,
and Fu, P.: Abundance and Diurnal Trends of Fluorescent Bioaerosols in the
Troposphere over Mt. Tai, China, in Spring, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124,
4158–4173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029486" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029486</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, Y., Wen, H., Liu, J., Pu, W., Chen, Q., and Wang, X.: The optical characteristics and sources of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in seasonal snow of northwestern China, The Cryosphere, 13, 157–175, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-157-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-157-2019</a>, 2019.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Zsolnay, A., Baigar, E., Jimenez, M., Steinweg, B., and Saccomandi, F.:
Differentiating with fluorescence spectroscopy the sources of dissolved
organic matter in soils subjected to drying, Chemosphere, 38, 45–50,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00166-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00166-0</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
