<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-21-10005-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Measurement report: Emissions of intermediate-volatility organic compounds
from vehicles under real-world driving conditions in an urban tunnel</article-title><alt-title>Emissions of IVOCs
from vehicles under real-world driving conditions</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Emissions of IVOCs
from vehicles under real-world driving conditions}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H.~Fang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>Hua</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Xiaoqing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yanli</given-names></name>
          <email>zhang_yl86@gig.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0614-2096</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Pei</surname><given-names>Chenglei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Zuzhao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Yujun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Yanning</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>Jianhong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>Jianqiang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>Shaoxuan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>Shilu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Sheng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Jun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Ming</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>Xuewei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Zhenfeng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Runqi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Guohua</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6153-0748</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Weiwei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-6304</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Mingjin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8756-8445</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>Xiang</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-1879</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Bi</surname><given-names>Xinhui</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3929-5470</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Xinming</given-names></name>
          <email>wangxm@gig.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-0928</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key
Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou
Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>CAS Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou 510640,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Center for Excellence in Urban Atmospheric Environment, Institute of
Urban Environment, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Guangzhou Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center of Guangdong
Province, Guangzhou 510060, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Guangzhou Environmental Technology Center, Guangzhou 510180, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Guangzhou Tunnel Development Company, Guangzhou 510133, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Xinming Wang (wangxm@gig.ac.cn) and Yanli Zhang (zhang_yl86@gig.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>10005</fpage><lpage>10013</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>26</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e337">Intermediate-volatility organic compounds (IVOCs) emitted from vehicles are
important precursors to secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) in urban areas, yet
vehicular emission of IVOCs, particularly from on-road fleets, is poorly
understood. Here we initiated a field campaign to collect IVOCs with
sorption tubes at both the inlet and the outlet in a busy urban tunnel
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vehicles per day) in south China for characterizing
emissions of IVOCs from on-road vehicles. The average emission factor of
IVOCs (EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) was measured to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % CI, confidence interval) for diesel and gasoline vehicles in the
fleets, and based on linear regression, the average EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was derived
to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.79</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for diesel vehicles and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for gasoline vehicles. The EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for diesel
vehicles from this study was comparable to that reported previously for
non-road engines without after-treatment facilities, while the EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
for gasoline vehicles from this study was much higher than that recently
tested for a China V gasoline vehicle. IVOCs from the on-road fleets did not
show significant correlation with the primary organic aerosol (POA) or total
non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) as results from previous chassis
dynamometer tests. Estimated SOA production from the vehicular IVOCs and
VOCs surpassed the POA by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and IVOCs
dominated over VOCs in estimated SOA production by a factor of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that controlling IVOCs is of greater
importance to modulate traffic-related organic aerosol (OA) in urban areas. The results
demonstrated that although on-road gasoline vehicles have much lower
EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, they contribute more IVOCs than on-road diesel vehicles due to
its dominance in the on-road fleets. However, due to greater diesel than
gasoline fuel consumption in China, emission of IVOCs from diesel engines
would be much larger than that from gasoline engines, signaling the
overwhelming contribution of IVOC emissions by non-road diesel engines in
China.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page10006?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e513">Intermediate-volatility organic compounds (IVOCs) refer to organics with
effective saturated concentrations ranging from 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, roughly corresponding to the volatility range of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
normal alkanes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes) (Donahue et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2014).
Robinson et al. (2007) have demonstrated that IVOCs, as the missing
secondary organic aerosol (SOA) precursors in many model studies, could
efficiently narrow the gap between model-predicted and field-observed SOA.
Smog chamber studies involving individual IVOC species, like higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes and two-ring aromatics, have confirmed their significantly higher
SOA formation potentials (Chan et al., 2009; Presto et al., 2010; Liu et
al., 2015). In addition, recent model simulations including IVOCs as SOA
precursors revealed that 30 %–80 % of ambient SOA could
be explained by IVOCs (Ots et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2016; Yang et al.,
2019; Lu et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2020). However, due to a lack of direct
measurements, these model simulations used the ratios of IVOCs to other
species like primary organic aerosol (POA) or non-methane hydrocarbons
(NMHCs) to estimate IVOC emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e586">Vehicular emission is an important anthropogenic source of IVOCs especially
in urban environments (Tkacik et al., 2014; Jathar et al., 2014; Cross et
al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2015, 2016; Ots et al., 2016). IVOCs could account
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) from diesel
vehicles and 4 %–17 % from gasoline vehicles, explaining a dominant
portion of estimated SOA mass from diesel and gasoline exhaust (Zhao et al.,
2015, 2016). Previous chamber simulations on SOA formation from vehicle
exhaust revealed that traditional volatile organic compounds (VOCs) could
not explain the formed SOA, and IVOCs instead might dominate the SOA
production (Deng et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). In megacities like
London, diesel-emitted IVOCs alone could contribute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
SOA formed in ambient air (Ots et al., 2016). Therefore, for the control of
fine particle pollution in urban areas, it is necessary to compile and
upgrade emission inventories for IVOCs, and more work is needed to
characterize their emissions from on-road vehicles.</p>
      <p id="d1e609">Although previous chassis dynamometer tests used limited numbers of vehicles
to characterize IVOC emissions (Zhao et al., 2015, 2016; Tang et al., 2021),
the results obtained from the tests were widely applied to recent models and
emission inventories (Liu et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2019;
Huang et al., 2020). However, driving conditions significantly influence
vehicular IVOC emissions (Drozd et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2021); therefore,
emissions of IVOCs under real-world driving conditions may be quite
different from that measured with chassis dynamometers. The tunnel test is a
widely used method to characterize vehicle emissions in light of its
advantage in capturing real-world emissions with a large number of driving
vehicles. The emissions of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, carbonaceous aerosols, VOCs, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from on-road vehicles have been widely studied based on tunnel
tests (Liu et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2016, 2017, 2018). However, to the
best of our knowledge, until present no reports are available about vehicular
emission factors of IVOCs through tunnel tests.</p>
      <p id="d1e639">In China, the number of on-road vehicles reached 348 million in 2019, which is more
than double that in 2009 (<uri>http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/ydyhjgl/</uri>, last access: 1 July 2021).
However, emissions of IVOCs from mobile sources in China are very
understudied. Only very recently, Tang et al. (2021) tested emissions
of IVOCs from a China V light-duty gasoline vehicle. As IVOC emission
factors derived from vehicle tests in the US have been used to update
China's emission inventories with the inclusion of IVOCs (Liu et al., 2017),
it is unknown whether the borrowed emission factors could well reflect the
vehicular emissions of IVOCs in China. On the other hand, although China has
made great achievements in combating air pollution in recent years, fine
particle pollution is still an air quality problem in many of China's cities
(Wang et al., 2020). As organic matter is often the most abundant
component in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SOA pollution is increasingly standing out with
the intensified primary emission control (Guo et al., 2020), understanding IVOC emissions from on-road vehicles is of great importance
given that vehicle-emitted IVOCs contribute greatly to urban SOA formation
(Gentner et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e655">In this study, the emissions of IVOCs from on-road vehicles under real-world
driving conditions were characterized through tests in an urban tunnel in
Guangzhou, which is a megacity in southern China. The study aims to (1) investigate
chemical compositions and volatility of IVOCs from on-road driving vehicles;
(2) obtain average IVOC emission factors for the on-road fleet based on tests in
the tunnel; (3) retrieve average IVOC emission factors for gasoline- and
diesel-fueled vehicles by regression analysis, taking advantage of a large
number of vehicles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per day) passing the tunnel; and (4) compare the SOA formation potential of vehicle-emitted IVOCs to that of
vehicle-emitted VOCs measured in the same campaign.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Field sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e686">The sampling campaign was concurrently conducted at both the inlet and at the
outlet of the Zhujiang tunnel (23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 113<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E),
which is located in urban Guangzhou, southern China (Fig. S1), on three
weekdays (14–16 October 2019) and two weekend days (13 and 19 October 2019). A detailed description of the Zhujiang
tunnel can be found in our previous studies (Liu et al., 2014; Zhang et
al., 2016, 2017, 2018). IVOCs were collected by a sorption tube (Tenax TA/Carbograph 5TD, Marks International Ltd., UK) using an automatic sampler
(JEC921, Jectec Science and Technology,<?pagebreak page10007?> Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). A Teflon
filter was installed before the tube to remove particles in the air flow.
The sampling flow rate was set at 0.6 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and hourly samples were
collected from 05:00 to 24:00 LT on each sampling day. In order to compare
SOA production from IVOCs and VOCs, hourly VOC samples were collected on
13 October 2019 with stainless-steel canisters at a flow rate of 66.7 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> using a model 910 pressurized canister sampler (Xonteck, Inc.,
CA, USA). Two-hour quartz filter samples were also collected by a high-volume
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sampler (Thermo Electron, Inc., USA) at the outlet and inlet
sampling sites from 13 to 19 October. Trace gases were
measured by online analyzers (CO, model 48i, Thermo Electron Inc., USA; NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
model 42i, Thermo Electron Inc., USA). A video camera was installed at the
inlet to record the vehicle flow during the campaign. After sampling, the
video data were used to count the passing vehicles and classify vehicles
into different fuel types.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Laboratory analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e776">Sampled sorption tubes were analyzed by a thermal desorption (TD) system
(TD-100, Markes International Ltd., UK) coupled to a gas chromatography and mass selective detector (GC/MSD; 7890 GC/5975 MSD, Agilent Technologies,
USA) with a capillary column (HP-5MS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Agilent Technologies, USA). Deuterated standards
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
naphthalene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, acenaphthene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and phenanthrene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) were
injected into the sorption tubes to determine their recoveries before
analysis. The sampled sorption tubes and field blanks were thermally
desorbed at 320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 20 min, and the desorbed compounds were
carried by high-purity helium into a cryogenic trap at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; then the trap was rapidly heated to transfer them into the GC/MSD
system. The initial temperature of the GC oven was set at 65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, held
for 2 min, then increased to 290 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and kept at 290 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 20 min. The MSD was used in the SCAN mode
with an electron impacting ionization at 70 eV.</p>
      <p id="d1e969">Individual speciated IVOCs were quantified with the calibration curves by
using authentic standards. The total IVOC mass was determined using the
approach developed by Zhao et al. (2014, 2015, 2016), and a detailed
description is provided in the Supplement (Sect. S1). Briefly,
the total ion chromatogram (TIC) of IVOCs was divided into 11 bins based on
the retention times of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes. Each bin centered on the
retention time of an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane. The start time and end times of the bin were
determined by the average retention time of two successive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes. For
example, the start time of bin 16 (B16) was calculated as the average
retention time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the end time of B16 as the
average retention time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The IVOC mass in each
bin was quantified by the response factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane in the same bin. The
total IVOC mass was the sum of IVOC masses determined in the 11 bins. The
mass of unresolved complex mixtures of IVOCs (UCM-IVOCs) was determined by
the difference between the total IVOCs and speciated IVOCs in each bin. The
UCM-IVOCs were further classified into unspeciated branch alkanes
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes) and cyclic compounds (Zhao et al., 2014) (Sect. S1). The
analysis of VOCs can be found elsewhere (Zhang et al., 2018). The POA
emission was estimated as 1.2 times that of organic carbon that was measured
in quartz filter samples (Zhao et al., 2015), which were analyzed by an
OC/EC analyzer (DRI model 2015, Nevada, USA) (Li et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC)</title>
      <p id="d1e1099">Before their use for field sampling, sorption tubes were conditioned at 320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 2 h in an oxygen-free nitrogen flow and then sealed at
both ends with brass storage caps fitted with PTFE ferrules. About 15 % of
conditioned tubes were selected randomly to be analyzed in the same way as
normal samples to check if any targeted species existed in the tubes. The
batch of sorption tubes were certified as clean if speciated IVOCs were not
found or presented in levels below the method detection limits (MDLs).
Before and after sampling, the flow rates of samplers were calibrated by a
soap-membrane flowmeter (Gilian Gilibrator-2, Sensidyne, USA). During the
sampling, 10 field blanks (five at the inlet and five at the outlet) were
collected by installing a sorption tube onto the sampler each day but with
pump off at both the inlet and the outlet. The speciated IVOCs were not
detected or presented in levels below their MDLs in the blanks. MDLs for all
the speciated IVOCs, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes and polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs), were below 8 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, such as 5.8 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 5.9 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 4.7 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. To check if any breakthrough occurred during the sampling, prior
to the field campaign two sorption tubes were connected in series to sample
at the tunnel outlet station in the same way. IVOCs detected in the second
tube only accounted for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the total in the two tubes,
indicating negligible breakthrough during the sampling. To check the
recoveries during thermodesorption, selected sampled sorption tubes were
analyzed twice by the TD-GC/MS system, and the desorption recoveries,
calculated as the percentage of IVOCs in first analysis, were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % on average. Duplicated samples revealed less than 15 % differences
for all the speciated IVOCs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Calculation of IVOC emission factors</title>
      <?pagebreak page10008?><p id="d1e1248">The vehicular EF of IVOCs can be calculated by the following equation (Pierson and Brachaczek, 1983; Zhang et al., 2016, 2017, 2018):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M85" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where EF (mg km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> veh.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the fleet-average emission factor of a
given species during the time interval <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (1 h in this study); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the inlet–outlet incremental concentration of IVOCs; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is wind speed parallel to the tunnel measured by a 3-D sonic
anemometer (Campbell, Inc.); A (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the cross-sectional area of the
tunnel; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of vehicles traveling through the tunnel during the
time interval <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (km) is the distance between the outlet and the inlet.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1402">Diurnal variations of vehicle fleets and fleet-average
EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the sampling period. Error bars represent 95 %
confidence intervals.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/10005/2021/acp-21-10005-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Emission factors and compositions of IVOCs</title>
      <p id="d1e1436">Figure 1 shows diurnal variations of vehicle numbers and vehicular IVOC
emission factors (EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the campaign. Traffic flow in the
tunnel varied between 571 and 2263 vehicles per hour during the campaign, and gasoline
vehicles (GVs) dominated the vehicle fleets with a share of 76.3 % on
average; diesel vehicles (DVs) only accounted for 4.0 %, and other types
of vehicles, including liquefied petroleum gas vehicles (LPGVs) and
electrical vehicles (EVs), had an average percentage of 18.7 % (Fig. S2).
As LPGVs and EVs are considered to have no IVOC emissions (Stewart et al.,
2021), only GVs and DVs are responsible for the inlet–outlet incremental
concentrations of IVOCs. Based on the above Eq. (1), fleet-average
EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (GVs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DVs) ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.29</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> veh.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> veh.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an average of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> veh.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % CI, confidence interval)
(Fig. 1). The average EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for DVs and GVs could be further derived
through linear regression as below (Ho et al., 2007; Kramer et al., 2020):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M112" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DV</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GV</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the fleet-average emission
factor measured during a time interval; EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DV</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GV</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the average EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
for DVs and GVs, respectively; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fraction
of DVs in the total IVOC-emitting DVs and GVs traveling through the tunnel.
Based on the regression results (Fig. S3), the average EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for DVs
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.79</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> veh.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> times
that for GVs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> veh.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1772">Comparison of the EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measured in this study with that
previously measured for fossil fuel combustion sources. The error
bars in <bold>(a)</bold> represent 95 % confidence interval. In <bold>(b)</bold>, the boxes
represent the 75th and 25th percentiles, the centerlines are the
medians, and squares are the averages. The whiskers represent the 10th and
90th percentiles. SORMs refer to small off-road machines fueled with
gasoline. NRCMs represent non-road construction machines fueled with
diesel.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/10005/2021/acp-21-10005-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1796">The mileage-based EF can be converted to fuel-based EF with the fuel density
and fuel efficiency (Sect. S2) (Zhang et al., 2016). Thus, we could obtain an
average fuel-based EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">239.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for GVs
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">984.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">288.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for DVs. Zhao et al. (2015, 2016)
measured IVOC emissions from DVs and GVs in the US by dynamometer
tests. As shown in Fig. 2, the average EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for DVs measured in our
study was significantly lower than that for DVs without any diesel
particulate filter (DPF) in the US but over 4 times higher than that with
DPF. It is worth noting that the EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for DVs from this study was
comparable to that for ships and non-road construction machines (NRCMs)
with diesel-fueled engines in China (Fig. 2) (Huang et al., 2018; Qi et al.,
2019). As a matter of fact, China III or lower emission standard DVs
accounted for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of China's total in-use DVs in 2019
(<uri>http://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk13/202012/t20201201_810776.html</uri>, last access: 1 July 2021), and like the non-road engines, they are not equipped with any
after-treatment facilities. Although the after-treatment systems are
installed in the China IV and China V DVs, their working performance might
be not so satisfactory (Wu et al., 2017). This may explain why the DVs in
this study had IVOC EFs comparable to non-road engines. The EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
for GVs from this study fell into the ranges of that for GVs in the US but
was at the high end of the tested values (Fig. 2). A recent study revealed a
significantly lower EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 83.7 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for a China V gasoline
vehicle (Tang et al., 2021), implying that upgrading the<?pagebreak page10009?> emission standard
could help reduce emissions of IVOCs from GVs, as China IV and China III GVs
still share a much larger portion than the China V and China VI ones in China's
on-road fleets
(<uri>http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/ydyhjgl/201909/P020190905586230826402.pdf</uri>, last access: 1 July 2021).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1925">The average emission factor of vehicular IVOCs in different bins
measured during the campaign.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/10005/2021/acp-21-10005-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1934">Figure 3 shows the EFs and compositions of the vehicular IVOCs in each
retention-time-based bin (Table S1). Similar to previous studies (Zhao et
al., 2015, 2016; Huang et al., 2018; Qi et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2021),
the unspeciated cyclic compounds dominated the IVOCs, accounting for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.07</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, followed by unspeciated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)
and speciated IVOCs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.66</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). Among the speciated IVOCs
(Table S1), naphthalene dominated the quantified PAHs, accounting for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of total PAH emissions. The distribution of IVOCs in
retention-time-based bins presented a significant decreasing trend with bin
numbers. Previous studies have reported that more than 50 % of IVOCs
concentrated in higher-volatility bins like B12, B13, and B14 in gasoline
exhaust, while much broader volatility distributions were found in diesel
exhaust (Zhao et al., 2015, 2016; Tang et al., 2021). The IVOCs in
B12 measured in this study was also the most abundant as the GVs previously
tested in the US (Fig. S4). This was reasonable since the GVs dominated the
vehicle fleets during our tunnel experiments (Fig. S2). As shown in Fig. S5,
the IVOCs determined in each volatility bin well correlated with those in
the volatility bins close to them, and the total IVOCs have stronger
correlations with IVOCs in the higher-volatility bins like B12, B13, and B14.
In addition, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes, as displayed in Table S2, were found to be
significantly correlated to the total IVOCs that determined in the same
volatility bins except for B20 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mass ratios of IVOCs to
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane in the bins ranged from 9.0 to 15.8 (Table S2). As <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes can be
more easily and routinely quantified, the relationships of IVOCs and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes in each volatility bin might be used to estimate total IVOCs from
on-road vehicles. However, vehicles types should be taken into consideration
when using these ratios, as the results here were obtained for a fleet
dominated by GVs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Relationships between IVOCs and other species</title>
      <p id="d1e2045">Emissions of IVOCs from vehicles are often estimated by assuming a ratio of
IVOCs to other species such as POA or NMHCs (Shrivastava et al., 2008; Pye and Seinfeld, 2010; Gentner et al., 2012; Murphy et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2019).
However, these ratios might be highly variable with fuel types, operation
conditions, and engine performance (Lu et al., 2018). As demonstrated in Fig. S6a and b, IVOCs correlated well with NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and CO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with an average IVOC-to-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.039</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and an average IVOC-to-CO ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.033</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.015</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The measured IVOC-to-POA ratio was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S6c), which is comparable to that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for GVs previously measured
in dynamometer tests simulating arterial and freeway cycles but much higher
than that of 1.5 previously used for estimating vehicle emissions in models
(Robinson et al., 2007; Hodzic et al., 2010). As shown in Fig. S6d, the
average IVOC-to-NMHC ratio measured in this study was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which is lower than that previously measured for diesel vehicle exhaust (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Zhao et al., 2015) but higher than that previously measured for
gasoline vehicle exhaust (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Zhao et al., 2016; Tang et al.,
2021). It is worth noting that the IVOCs did not present significant
correlations with POA or NMHCs from this study for on-road vehicle fleets
(Fig. S6c and d). This would cast uncertainty over the emission
estimates of IVOCs based on their ratios to POA or NMHCs.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2200">The predicted SOA formation potentials from different classes of
precursors (VOC
and IVOCs). The error bars represent 95 % confidence intervals.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/10005/2021/acp-21-10005-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Estimated SOA production from IVOCs</title>
      <?pagebreak page10010?><p id="d1e2217">SOA formation potentials of IVOCs from the on-road vehicle fleet as measured in
this tunnel study can be estimated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M162" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SOA</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the SOA formation potential from the gaseous precursors;
EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the emission factor of precursor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the SOA
yield of precursor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> under high NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at OA concentration of 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zhao et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2018; Qi et al., 2019; Tang et
al., 2021) (Table S3). As shown in Fig. 4, the SOA formation potentials from
vehicular VOCs and IVOCs totaled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
SOA-to-POA ratio was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was comparable to that of GVs
tested in China (1.8–4.4) (Tang et al., 2021) and that of GVs (3.6) (Zhao
et al., 2016) and high-speed DVs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) without DPF in the US
(Zhao et al., 2015). Our previous chamber studies simulating SOA formation
from vehicle exhausts revealed the SOA-to-POA ratios of 2.0 for DVs and 3.8
for GVs when cruising at 40 km h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Deng et al., 2020; Zhang et al.,
2020), which is near the average driving speed of vehicles in the tunnel.
Among the vehicle-emitted SOA precursors, similar to previous studies (Zhao
et al., 2015, 2016; Huang et al., 2018; Qi et al., 2019; Tang et al.,
2021), IVOCs produced significantly higher SOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> times that from traditional VOCs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Previous smog chamber studies found that SOA formed
during photochemical aging of vehicle exhaust could not be explained by traditional
VOCs, especially for vehicles cruising at higher speeds (Robinson et al.,
2007; Deng et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). If this
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 7 from this study is used to
re-estimate the SOA formation from exhaust for vehicles cruising at 40 km h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in our previous chamber studies (Deng et al., 2020; Zhang et al.,
2020), the VOC plus IVOC precursors could explain 91 %–98 % SOA
formed for GVs and 31.2 %–48.2 % SOA formed for DVs. Zhao et al. (2015, 2016) reported significantly higher SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
for diesel vehicle exhaust than gasoline vehicle exhaust. Furthermore, we
also resolved the SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios for DVs and GVs via
liner regression (Sect. S3). As shown in Fig. S7, although the correlation
between SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and DV fractions was not
significant, the DVs did present a much higher average
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (54.9) than that of GVs (6.82). Thus,
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 7 obtained from this study in a
tunnel dominated by GVs would underestimate SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from DVs,
consistent with higher NMHCs to IVOCs ratios in gasoline exhaust than in
diesel exhaust (Zhao et al., 2015, 2016; Huang et al., 2018; Qi et al.,
2019; Tang et al., 2021). Overall, the observed vehicular IVOCs as SOA
precursors can help achieve mass closure between predicted and measured SOA.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions and implications</title>
      <p id="d1e2582">Organic aerosol (OA), primary or secondary, accounts for a large fraction of
particle matter (Zhang et al., 2007; Jimenez et al., 2009). On-road
vehicles could be an important source of OA especially in urban environments
(Gentner et al., 2017). Similar to previous smog chamber simulation results
about SOA formed from photochemical aging of vehicle exhaust (Deng et al.,
2020; Zhang et al., 2020), our tunnel test also demonstrated that estimated
SOA surpassed the POA emission. In addition, IVOCs were found to dominate
over traditional VOCs in SOA formation potentials by a factor of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, implying that reducing vehicle-emitted IVOCs is of
greater importance to modulate SOA for further reducing fine particle
pollution particularly in urban areas. As for the ratios of IVOCs to other
primary species, our tunnel tests for the on-road fleet revealed that, although
the ratios of IVOC to POA and IVOC to NMHC were comparable to those from
previous chassis dynamometer tests, no significant positive correlations
were found between IVOCs and POA or NMHCs in our tunnel measurements. This
implied that caution should be taken when applying the ratios from chassis
dynamometer tests to estimate real-world traffic emissions or applying the
ratios in the US to estimate the emissions in China or other regions. As
IVOCs are not considered in normal vehicle emission tests, more field work
characterizing real-world vehicular emissions of IVOCs is needed to further
constrain these ratios.</p>
      <p id="d1e2595">EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the GV-dominated fleets from our tunnel test or
EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for GVs derived from regression was much higher than that from
a recent chassis test for a China V gasoline vehicle (Tang et al., 2021),
suggesting that stricter emission standards might help reduce emissions of
IVOCs from GVs. Meanwhile, the EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for on-road DVs was comparable
to that for non-road engines without any after-treatment devices (Huang et al.,
2018; Qi et al., 2019), suggesting that facilitating the installation of
after-treatment devices with stricter emission standards or improving the
performance of existing after-treatment devices is crucial to lower IVOC
emissions from DVs, which have much higher EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> than GVs.</p>
      <?pagebreak page10011?><p id="d1e2634">Based on the regression-derived average EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for GVs and DVs and the
camera-recorded fleet compositions, we could estimate that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of IVOCs by vehicles traveling through the tunnel were coming from
GVs and only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % were from DVs (Table S4). This is
reasonable since DVs have higher EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> but much lower
proportions in the fleets. These percentages may underestimate the
contribution to IVOCs by on-road DVs at regional or national scales since
DVs travel less in core urban areas due to traffic restriction rules in
China. Differently, in an updated emission inventory of vehicular IVOCs in
China (Liu et al., 2017) based on EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tested in the US, emissions of
IVOCs from DVs (145.07 Gg) were about 2.6 times that from GVs (55.30 Gg) in
China in 2015. However, the ratio of DV EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to GV EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> used
in the study (Liu et al., 2017) on average was much higher than that of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from this study for on-road vehicles. Using the
EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from tests in the US might underestimate IVOC emissions from
GVs but overestimate those from DVs in China. As an example, EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of
83.7 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reported very recently for a China V gasoline vehicle
(Tang et al., 2021) was still much higher than the maximum EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(47.15 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> they adopted for China V GVs, and the EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> used
for China III and China IV DVs were however significantly larger than
those from our tunnel tests (Fig. 2) for on-road DVs (mostly China III and
China IV) (Liu et al., 2017). In 2019 the gasoline and diesel fuel
consumptions in China were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.20</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Tg, respectively (<uri>http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/ydyhjgl/</uri>, last access: 1 July 2021).
Since gasoline is mostly used for on-road vehicles, diesel may be
used for both on-road and non-road engines, and  EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for
on-road diesel vehicles is comparable to that for non-road diesel engines
(Huang et al., 2018; Qi et al., 2019), we could use the fuel-based
EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IVOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> converted from our study to roughly estimate IVOCs from diesel
and gasoline combustion. This way, the estimated emission of IVOCs from diesel
engines (147.74 Gg) was about 5 times that from gasoline engines (28.74 Gg)
in China in 2019 (Table S4). In comparison to a previous study (Liu et al.,
2017), this result implies large uncertainties or even inconsistencies about
China's vehicular IVOC emission estimates. Moreover, as diesel vehicles
share less than 10 % among China's motor vehicles, and a substantial part
of diesel fuel is consumed by non-road engines, the diesel-related IVOCs may
largely come overwhelmingly from non-road engines instead of on-road DVs,
signaling the increasingly important role of non-road engines as sources of
IVOCs with the progress in on-road vehicular emission control.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2833">The dataset for this paper is available upon
request from the corresponding author Xinming Wang (wangxm@gig.ac.cn).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e2836">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10005-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10005-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2845">XW and YZ designed the campaign and
provided the funding supports. HF and XH analyzed the samples. HF
wrote the paper. GZ, WH, MT, XD, and XB provided suggestions for
this paper. XW revised and edited the paper. The others in author list
conducted the field work.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2851">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.<?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-2mm}}?></p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e2858">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.<?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-2mm}}?></p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2865">The authors gratefully acknowledge the Guangzhou Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center of Guangdong Province and the Guangzhou Tunnel Development Company for their support during the tunnel experiment.<?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-2mm}}?></p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2871">This work has been funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41961144029 and 42022023), the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant nos. QYZDJ-SSW-DQC032, XDA23010303, and XDA23020301), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS (grant no. 2017406), the Hong Kong Theme-base project (grant no. T24-504/17-N), and the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (grant nos. 2020B1212060053, 2017BT01Z134, and 2019B121205006).<?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-2mm}}?></p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2878">This paper was edited by Jianzhong Ma and reviewed by two anonymous referees.<?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-2mm}}?></p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chan, A. W. H., Kautzman, K. E., Chhabra, P. S., Surratt, J. D., Chan, M. N., Crounse, J. D., Kürten, A., Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from photooxidation of naphthalene and alkylnaphthalenes: implications for oxidation of intermediate volatility organic compounds (IVOCs), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3049–3060, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3049-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3049-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cross, E. S., Sappok, A., Wong, V., and Kroll, J. H.: Load-dependent
emission factors and chemical characteristics of IVOCs from a medium-duty
diesel engine, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 13483–13491,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03954" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b03954</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Deng, W., Fang, Z., Wang, Z. Y., Zhu, M., Zhang, Y. L., Tang, M. J., Song,
W., Lowther, S., Huang, Z. H., Jones, K., Peng, P. A., and Wang, X. M.:
Primary emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation from in-use diesel
vehicle exhaust: comparison between idling and cruise mode, Sci. Total
Environ., 699, 134357, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134357" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134357</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052297c</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drozd, G. T., Zhao, Y. L., Saliba, G., Frodin, B., Maddox, C., Oliver Chang,
M. C., Maldonado, H., Sardar, S., Weber, R. J., Robinson, A. L., and
Goldstein, A. H.: Detailed speciation of intermediate volatility and
semivolatile organic compound emissions from gasoline vehicles: effects of
cold-starts and implications for secondary organic aerosol formation,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 1706–1714,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05600" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b05600</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gentner, D. R., Isaacman, G., Worton, D. R., Chan, A. W. H., Dallmann, T.
R., Davis, L., Liu, S., Day, D. A., Russell, L. M., Wilson, K. R., Weber,
R., Guha, A., Harley, R. A., and Goldstein, A. H.: Elucidating secondary
organic aerosol from diesel and gasoline vehicles through detailed
characterization of organic carbon emissions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 18318–18323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212272109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1212272109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gentner, D. R., Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T, D., Bahreini, R., Day, D. A., EI
Haddad, I., Hays, P. L., Pieber, S. M., Platt, S. M., de Gouw, J.,
Goldstein, A. H., Harley, R. A., Jimenez, J. L., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
and Robinson, A. L.: Review of urba<?pagebreak page10012?>n secondary organic aerosol formation
from gasoline and diesel motor vehicle emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
51, 1074–1093, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b04509</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guo, J., Zhou, S., Cai, M., Zhao, J., Song, W., Zhao, W., Hu, W., Sun, Y., He, Y., Yang, C., Xu, X., Zhang, Z., Cheng, P., Fan, Q., Hang, J., Fan, S., Wang, X., and Wang, X.: Characterization of submicron particles by time-of-flight aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ToF-ACSM) during wintertime: aerosol composition, sources, and chemical processes in Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7595–7615, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7595-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-7595-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ho, K. F., Ho, S. S. H., Cheng, Y., Lee, S. C., and Yu, J. Z.: Real-world
emission factors of fifteen carbonyl compounds measured in a Hong Kong
tunnel, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1747–1758,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.027</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hodzic, A., Jimenez, J. L., Madronich, S., Canagaratna, M. R., DeCarlo, P. F., Kleinman, L., and Fast, J.: Modeling organic aerosols in a megacity: potential contribution of semi-volatile and intermediate volatility primary organic compounds to secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5491–5514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5491-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5491-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, C., Hu, Q. Y., Li, Y. J., Tian, J. J., Ma, Y. G., Zhao, Y. L., Feng,
J. L., An, J. Y., Qiao, L. P., Wang, H. L., Jing, S. A., Huang, D. D., Lou,
S. R., Zhou, M., Zhu, S. H., Tao, S. K., and Li, L.: Intermediate volatility
organic compound emissions from a large cargo vessel operated under
real-world conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 12934–12942,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04418" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b04418</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, L., Wang, Q., Wang, Y. J., Emery, C., Zhu, A. S., Zhu, Y. H., Yin, S.
J., Yarwood, G., Zhang, K., and Li, L.: Simulation of secondary organic
aerosol over the Yangtze River Delta region: the impacts from the emissions
of intermediate volatility organic compounds and the SOA modeling framework,
Atmos. Environ., 246, 118079, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118079</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Hennigan, C. J., Pye, H. O., Pouliot, G.,
Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Unspeciated organic
emissions from combustion sources and their influence on the secondary
organic aerosol budget in the United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 10473–10478, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1323740111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P.
I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer,
S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A.,
Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina,
K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A.
M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E.,
Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the
atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kramer, L. J., Crilley, L. R., Adams, T. J., Ball, S. M., Pope, F. D., and Bloss, W. J.: Nitrous acid (HONO) emissions under real-world driving conditions from vehicles in a UK road tunnel, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5231–5248, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5231-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-5231-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, S., Zhu, M., Yang, W. Q., Tang, M. J., Huang, X. L., Yu, Y. G., Fang,
H., Yu, X., Yu, Q. Q., Fu, X. X.; Song, W., Zhang, Y. L., Bi, X. H., and
Wang, X. M.: Filter-based measurement of light absorption by brown carbon in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in a megacity in South China, Sci. Total Environ., 633,
1360–1369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.235" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.235</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, H., Man, H., Cui, H., Wang, Y., Deng, F., Wang, Y., Yang, X., Xiao, Q., Zhang, Q., Ding, Y., and He, K.: An updated emission inventory of vehicular VOCs and IVOCs in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12709–12724, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12709-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-12709-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, T., Wang, X., Deng, W., Hu, Q., Ding, X., Zhang, Y., He, Q., Zhang, Z., Lü, S., Bi, X., Chen, J., and Yu, J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from photochemical aging of light-duty gasoline vehicle exhausts in a smog chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9049–9062, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9049-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-9049-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, T. Y., Wang, X. M., Wang, B. G., Ding, X., Deng, W., Lü, S. J., and
Zhang, Y. L.: Emission factor of ammonia (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) from on-road vehicles in
China: tunnel tests in urban Guangzhou, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 064027,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064027</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lu, Q., Zhao, Y., and Robinson, A. L.: Comprehensive organic emission profiles for gasoline, diesel, and gas-turbine engines including intermediate and semi-volatile organic compound emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17637–17654, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17637-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17637-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lu, Q., Murphy, B. N., Qin, M., Adams, P. J., Zhao, Y., Pye, H. O. T., Efstathiou, C., Allen, C., and Robinson, A. L.: Simulation of organic aerosol formation during the CalNex study: updated mobile emissions and secondary organic aerosol parameterization for intermediate-volatility organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4313–4332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4313-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4313-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murphy, B. N., Woody, M. C., Jimenez, J. L., Carlton, A. M. G., Hayes, P. L., Liu, S., Ng, N. L., Russell, L. M., Setyan, A., Xu, L., Young, J., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, Q., and Pye, H. O. T.: Semivolatile POA and parameterized total combustion SOA in CMAQv5.2: impacts on source strength and partitioning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11107–11133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ots, R., Young, D. E., Vieno, M., Xu, L., Dunmore, R. E., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Williams, L. R., Herndon, S. C., Ng, N. L., Hamilton, J. F., Bergström, R., Di Marco, C., Nemitz, E., Mackenzie, I. A., Kuenen, J. J. P., Green, D. C., Reis, S., and Heal, M. R.: Simulating secondary organic aerosol from missing diesel-related intermediate-volatility organic compound emissions during the Clean Air for London (ClearfLo) campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6453–6473, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6453-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-6453-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pierson, W. R. and Brachaczek, W. W.: Emissions of ammonia and amines from
vehicles in the road, Environ. Sci. Technol., 17, 757–760,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00118a013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00118a013</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page10013?><ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Presto, A. A. and Miracolo, M. A.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from
high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photo-oxidation of low volatility precursors: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 2029–2034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es903712r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es903712r</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T. and Seinfeld, J. H.: A global perspective on aerosol from low-volatility organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4377–4401, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4377-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4377-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Qi, L. J., Liu, H., Shen, X. E., Fu, M. L., Huang, F. F., Man, H. Y., Deng,
F. Y., Shaikh, A. A., Wang, X. T., Dong, R., Song, C., and He, K. B.:
Intermediate-volatility organic compound emissions from nonroad construction
machinery under different operation modes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53,
13832–13840, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01316" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b01316</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking organic aerosols: semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1133061</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M. K., Lane, T. E., Donahue, N. M., Pandis, S. N., and
Robinson, A. L.: Effects of gas particle partitioning and aging of primary
emissions on urban and regional organic aerosol concentrations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D18301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009735</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stewart, G. J., Nelson, B. S., Acton, W. J. F., Vaughan, A. R., Farren, N. J., Hopkins, J. R., Ward, M. W., Swift, S. J., Arya, R., Mondal, A., Jangirh, R., Ahlawat, S., Yadav, L., Sharma, S. K., Yunus, S. S. M., Hewitt, C. N., Nemitz, E., Mullinger, N., Gadi, R., Sahu, L. K., Tripathi, N., Rickard, A. R., Lee, J. D., Mandal, T. K., and Hamilton, J. F.: Emissions of intermediate-volatility and semi-volatile organic compounds from domestic fuels used in Delhi, India, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2407–2426, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2407-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-2407-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tang, R., Lu, Q., Guo, S., Wang, H., Song, K., Yu, Y., Tan, R., Liu, K., Shen, R., Chen, S., Zeng, L., Jorga, S. D., Zhang, Z., Zhang, W., Shuai, S., and Robinson, A. L.: Measurement report: Distinct emissions and volatility distribution of intermediate-volatility organic compounds from on-road Chinese gasoline vehicles: implication of high secondary organic aerosol formation potential, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2569–2583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2569-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-2569-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tkacik, D. S., Lambe, A. T., Jathar, S., Li, X., Presto, A. A., Zhao, Y. L.,
Blake, D., Meinardi, S., Jayne, J. T., Croteau, P. L., and Robinson, A. L.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation from in-use motor vehicle emissions
using a potential aerosol mass reactor, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
11235–11242, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502239v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es502239v</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y. H., Gao, W. K., Wang, S., Song, T., Gong, Z. Y., Ji, D. S., Wang,
L. L., Liu, Z. R., Tang, G. Q., Huo, Y. F., Tian, S. L., Li, J. Y., Li, M.
G., Yang, Y., Chu, B. W., Petaja, T. K., Kerminen, V-M., He, H., Hao, J. M.,
Kulmala, M., Wang, Y. S., and Zhang, Y. H.: Contrasting trends of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and surface-ozone concentrations in China from 2013 to 2017, Nat. Sci. Rev.,
7, 1331–1339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nsr/nwaa032</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, L., Wang, X., Lu, S., Shao, M., and Ling, Z.: Emission inventory of semi-volatile and intermediate-volatility organic compounds and their effects on secondary organic aerosol over the Pearl River Delta region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8141–8161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8141-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8141-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, Y., Zhang, S. J., Hao, J. M., Liu, H., Wu, X. M., Hu, J. N., Walsh, M.
P., Wallington, T. J., Zhang, M. K., and Stevanovic, S.: On-road vehicle
emissions and their control in China: a review and outlook, Sci. Total
Environ., 574, 332–349, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.040</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, W. Y., Li, J., Wang, W. G., Li, J. L., Ge, M. F., Sun, Y. L., Chen, X.
S., Ge, B. Z., Tong, S. R., Wang, Q. Q., and Wang, Z. F.: Investigating
secondary organic aerosol formation pathways in China during 2014, Atmos.
Environ., 213, 133–147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.057</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Ulbrich, I., Alfarra, M. R., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A. M., and Sun, Y. L.:
Ubiquity and dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in
anthropogenically-influenced northern hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL029979</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. L., Wang, X. M., Wen, S., Herrmann, H., Yang, W. Q., Huang, X. Y.,
Zhang, Z., Huang, Z. H., He, Q. F., and George, C.: On-road vehicle emissions
of glyoxal and methylglyoxal from tunnel tests in urban Guangzhou, China,
Atmos. Environ., 127, 55–60, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.017</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. L., Yang, W. Q., Huang, Z. H., Liu, D., Simpson, I., Blake, D. R.,
George, C., and Wang, X. M.: Leakage rates of refrigerants CFC-12, HCFC-22,
and HFC-134a from operating mobile air conditioning systems in Guangzhou,
China: tests inside a busy urban tunnel under hot and humid weather
conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 4, 481–486,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00445" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00445</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. L., Yang, W. Q., Simpson, I., Huang, X. Y., Yu, J. Z., Huang, Z.
H., Wang, Z. Y., Zhang, Z., Liu, D., Huang, Z. Z., Wang, Y. J., Pei, C.
L.,Shao, M., Blake, D. R., Zheng, J. Y., Huang, Z. J., and Wang, X. M.:
Decadal changes in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from
on-road vehicles with intensified automobile pollution control: case study
in a busy urban tunnel in South China, Environ. Pollut., 233, 806–819,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.133" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.133</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. L., Deng, W., Hu, Q. H., Wu, Z. F., Yang, W. Q., Zhang, H. N.,
Wang, Z. Y., Fang, Z., Zhu, M., Li, S., Song, W., Ding, X., and Wang, X. M.:
Comparison between idling and cruising gasoline vehicles in primary
emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation during photochemical
ageing, Sci. Total Environ., 772, 137934,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137934" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137934</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y. L., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., Tkacik, D. S., de Gouw, J. A.,
Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., Borbon, A., and Robinson, A. L.:
Intermediate-volatility organic compounds: a large source of secondary
organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 13743–13750,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5035188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es5035188</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y. L., Nguyen, N. T., Presto, A. A., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., and
Robinson, A. L.: Intermediate volatility organic compound emissions from
on-road diesel Vehicles: chemical composition, emission factors, and
estimated secondary organic aerosol production, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
11516–11526, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02841" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b02841</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y. L., Nguyen, N. T., Presto, A. A., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., and
Robinson, A. L.: Intermediate volatility organic compound emissions from
on-road gasoline vehicles and small off-road gasoline engines, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 50, 4554–4563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b06247</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Measurement report: Emissions of intermediate-volatility organic compounds from vehicles under real-world driving conditions in an urban tunnel</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Intermediate-volatility organic compounds (IVOCs) emitted from vehicles are
important precursors to secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) in urban areas, yet
vehicular emission of IVOCs, particularly from on-road fleets, is poorly
understood. Here we initiated a field campaign to collect IVOCs with
sorption tubes at both the inlet and the outlet in a busy urban tunnel
( &gt; 30 000 vehicles per day) in south China for characterizing
emissions of IVOCs from on-road vehicles. The average emission factor of
IVOCs (EF<sub>IVOCs</sub>) was measured to be 16.77±0.89&thinsp;mg&thinsp;km<sup>−1</sup>
(average ±95&thinsp;% CI, confidence interval) for diesel and gasoline vehicles in the
fleets, and based on linear regression, the average EF<sub>IVOCs</sub> was derived
to be 62.79±18.37&thinsp;mg&thinsp;km<sup>−1</sup> for diesel vehicles and 13.95±1.13&thinsp;mg&thinsp;km<sup>−1</sup> for gasoline vehicles. The EF<sub>IVOCs</sub> for diesel
vehicles from this study was comparable to that reported previously for
non-road engines without after-treatment facilities, while the EF<sub>IVOCs</sub>
for gasoline vehicles from this study was much higher than that recently
tested for a China V gasoline vehicle. IVOCs from the on-road fleets did not
show significant correlation with the primary organic aerosol (POA) or total
non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) as results from previous chassis
dynamometer tests. Estimated SOA production from the vehicular IVOCs and
VOCs surpassed the POA by a factor of  ∼ 2.4, and IVOCs
dominated over VOCs in estimated SOA production by a factor of
 ∼ 7, suggesting that controlling IVOCs is of greater
importance to modulate traffic-related organic aerosol (OA) in urban areas. The results
demonstrated that although on-road gasoline vehicles have much lower
EF<sub>IVOCs</sub>, they contribute more IVOCs than on-road diesel vehicles due to
its dominance in the on-road fleets. However, due to greater diesel than
gasoline fuel consumption in China, emission of IVOCs from diesel engines
would be much larger than that from gasoline engines, signaling the
overwhelming contribution of IVOC emissions by non-road diesel engines in
China.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, A. W. H., Kautzman, K. E., Chhabra, P. S., Surratt, J. D., Chan, M. N., Crounse, J. D., Kürten, A., Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from photooxidation of naphthalene and alkylnaphthalenes: implications for oxidation of intermediate volatility organic compounds (IVOCs), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3049–3060, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3049-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3049-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Cross, E. S., Sappok, A., Wong, V., and Kroll, J. H.: Load-dependent
emission factors and chemical characteristics of IVOCs from a medium-duty
diesel engine, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 13483–13491,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03954" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03954</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Deng, W., Fang, Z., Wang, Z. Y., Zhu, M., Zhang, Y. L., Tang, M. J., Song,
W., Lowther, S., Huang, Z. H., Jones, K., Peng, P. A., and Wang, X. M.:
Primary emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation from in-use diesel
vehicle exhaust: comparison between idling and cruise mode, Sci. Total
Environ., 699, 134357, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134357" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134357</a>,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Drozd, G. T., Zhao, Y. L., Saliba, G., Frodin, B., Maddox, C., Oliver Chang,
M. C., Maldonado, H., Sardar, S., Weber, R. J., Robinson, A. L., and
Goldstein, A. H.: Detailed speciation of intermediate volatility and
semivolatile organic compound emissions from gasoline vehicles: effects of
cold-starts and implications for secondary organic aerosol formation,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 1706–1714,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05600" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05600</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Gentner, D. R., Isaacman, G., Worton, D. R., Chan, A. W. H., Dallmann, T.
R., Davis, L., Liu, S., Day, D. A., Russell, L. M., Wilson, K. R., Weber,
R., Guha, A., Harley, R. A., and Goldstein, A. H.: Elucidating secondary
organic aerosol from diesel and gasoline vehicles through detailed
characterization of organic carbon emissions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 18318–18323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212272109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212272109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Gentner, D. R., Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T, D., Bahreini, R., Day, D. A., EI
Haddad, I., Hays, P. L., Pieber, S. M., Platt, S. M., de Gouw, J.,
Goldstein, A. H., Harley, R. A., Jimenez, J. L., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
and Robinson, A. L.: Review of urban secondary organic aerosol formation
from gasoline and diesel motor vehicle emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
51, 1074–1093, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, J., Zhou, S., Cai, M., Zhao, J., Song, W., Zhao, W., Hu, W., Sun, Y., He, Y., Yang, C., Xu, X., Zhang, Z., Cheng, P., Fan, Q., Hang, J., Fan, S., Wang, X., and Wang, X.: Characterization of submicron particles by time-of-flight aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ToF-ACSM) during wintertime: aerosol composition, sources, and chemical processes in Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7595–7615, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7595-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7595-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Ho, K. F., Ho, S. S. H., Cheng, Y., Lee, S. C., and Yu, J. Z.: Real-world
emission factors of fifteen carbonyl compounds measured in a Hong Kong
tunnel, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1747–1758,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.027</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Hodzic, A., Jimenez, J. L., Madronich, S., Canagaratna, M. R., DeCarlo, P. F., Kleinman, L., and Fast, J.: Modeling organic aerosols in a megacity: potential contribution of semi-volatile and intermediate volatility primary organic compounds to secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5491–5514, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5491-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5491-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, C., Hu, Q. Y., Li, Y. J., Tian, J. J., Ma, Y. G., Zhao, Y. L., Feng,
J. L., An, J. Y., Qiao, L. P., Wang, H. L., Jing, S. A., Huang, D. D., Lou,
S. R., Zhou, M., Zhu, S. H., Tao, S. K., and Li, L.: Intermediate volatility
organic compound emissions from a large cargo vessel operated under
real-world conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 12934–12942,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04418" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04418</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, L., Wang, Q., Wang, Y. J., Emery, C., Zhu, A. S., Zhu, Y. H., Yin, S.
J., Yarwood, G., Zhang, K., and Li, L.: Simulation of secondary organic
aerosol over the Yangtze River Delta region: the impacts from the emissions
of intermediate volatility organic compounds and the SOA modeling framework,
Atmos. Environ., 246, 118079, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118079</a>,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Hennigan, C. J., Pye, H. O., Pouliot, G.,
Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Unspeciated organic
emissions from combustion sources and their influence on the secondary
organic aerosol budget in the United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 10473–10478, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P.
I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer,
S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A.,
Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina,
K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A.
M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E.,
Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the
atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Kramer, L. J., Crilley, L. R., Adams, T. J., Ball, S. M., Pope, F. D., and Bloss, W. J.: Nitrous acid (HONO) emissions under real-world driving conditions from vehicles in a UK road tunnel, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5231–5248, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5231-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5231-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Li, S., Zhu, M., Yang, W. Q., Tang, M. J., Huang, X. L., Yu, Y. G., Fang,
H., Yu, X., Yu, Q. Q., Fu, X. X.; Song, W., Zhang, Y. L., Bi, X. H., and
Wang, X. M.: Filter-based measurement of light absorption by brown carbon in
PM<sub>2.5</sub> in a megacity in South China, Sci. Total Environ., 633,
1360–1369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.235" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.235</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, H., Man, H., Cui, H., Wang, Y., Deng, F., Wang, Y., Yang, X., Xiao, Q., Zhang, Q., Ding, Y., and He, K.: An updated emission inventory of vehicular VOCs and IVOCs in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12709–12724, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12709-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12709-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, T., Wang, X., Deng, W., Hu, Q., Ding, X., Zhang, Y., He, Q., Zhang, Z., Lü, S., Bi, X., Chen, J., and Yu, J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from photochemical aging of light-duty gasoline vehicle exhausts in a smog chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9049–9062, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9049-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9049-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, T. Y., Wang, X. M., Wang, B. G., Ding, X., Deng, W., Lü, S. J., and
Zhang, Y. L.: Emission factor of ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) from on-road vehicles in
China: tunnel tests in urban Guangzhou, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 064027,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064027</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, Q., Zhao, Y., and Robinson, A. L.: Comprehensive organic emission profiles for gasoline, diesel, and gas-turbine engines including intermediate and semi-volatile organic compound emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17637–17654, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17637-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17637-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, Q., Murphy, B. N., Qin, M., Adams, P. J., Zhao, Y., Pye, H. O. T., Efstathiou, C., Allen, C., and Robinson, A. L.: Simulation of organic aerosol formation during the CalNex study: updated mobile emissions and secondary organic aerosol parameterization for intermediate-volatility organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4313–4332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4313-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4313-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, B. N., Woody, M. C., Jimenez, J. L., Carlton, A. M. G., Hayes, P. L., Liu, S., Ng, N. L., Russell, L. M., Setyan, A., Xu, L., Young, J., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, Q., and Pye, H. O. T.: Semivolatile POA and parameterized total combustion SOA in CMAQv5.2: impacts on source strength and partitioning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11107–11133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Ots, R., Young, D. E., Vieno, M., Xu, L., Dunmore, R. E., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Williams, L. R., Herndon, S. C., Ng, N. L., Hamilton, J. F., Bergström, R., Di Marco, C., Nemitz, E., Mackenzie, I. A., Kuenen, J. J. P., Green, D. C., Reis, S., and Heal, M. R.: Simulating secondary organic aerosol from missing diesel-related intermediate-volatility organic compound emissions during the Clean Air for London (ClearfLo) campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6453–6473, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6453-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6453-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Pierson, W. R. and Brachaczek, W. W.: Emissions of ammonia and amines from
vehicles in the road, Environ. Sci. Technol., 17, 757–760,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00118a013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es00118a013</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Presto, A. A. and Miracolo, M. A.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from
high-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> photo-oxidation of low volatility precursors: <i>n</i>-alkanes,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 2029–2034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es903712r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es903712r</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Pye, H. O. T. and Seinfeld, J. H.: A global perspective on aerosol from low-volatility organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4377–4401, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4377-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4377-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Qi, L. J., Liu, H., Shen, X. E., Fu, M. L., Huang, F. F., Man, H. Y., Deng,
F. Y., Shaikh, A. A., Wang, X. T., Dong, R., Song, C., and He, K. B.:
Intermediate-volatility organic compound emissions from nonroad construction
machinery under different operation modes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53,
13832–13840, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01316" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01316</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking organic aerosols: semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M. K., Lane, T. E., Donahue, N. M., Pandis, S. N., and
Robinson, A. L.: Effects of gas particle partitioning and aging of primary
emissions on urban and regional organic aerosol concentrations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D18301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009735" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009735</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Stewart, G. J., Nelson, B. S., Acton, W. J. F., Vaughan, A. R., Farren, N. J., Hopkins, J. R., Ward, M. W., Swift, S. J., Arya, R., Mondal, A., Jangirh, R., Ahlawat, S., Yadav, L., Sharma, S. K., Yunus, S. S. M., Hewitt, C. N., Nemitz, E., Mullinger, N., Gadi, R., Sahu, L. K., Tripathi, N., Rickard, A. R., Lee, J. D., Mandal, T. K., and Hamilton, J. F.: Emissions of intermediate-volatility and semi-volatile organic compounds from domestic fuels used in Delhi, India, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2407–2426, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2407-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2407-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, R., Lu, Q., Guo, S., Wang, H., Song, K., Yu, Y., Tan, R., Liu, K., Shen, R., Chen, S., Zeng, L., Jorga, S. D., Zhang, Z., Zhang, W., Shuai, S., and Robinson, A. L.: Measurement report: Distinct emissions and volatility distribution of intermediate-volatility organic compounds from on-road Chinese gasoline vehicles: implication of high secondary organic aerosol formation potential, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2569–2583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2569-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2569-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Tkacik, D. S., Lambe, A. T., Jathar, S., Li, X., Presto, A. A., Zhao, Y. L.,
Blake, D., Meinardi, S., Jayne, J. T., Croteau, P. L., and Robinson, A. L.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation from in-use motor vehicle emissions
using a potential aerosol mass reactor, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
11235–11242, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502239v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es502239v</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y. H., Gao, W. K., Wang, S., Song, T., Gong, Z. Y., Ji, D. S., Wang,
L. L., Liu, Z. R., Tang, G. Q., Huo, Y. F., Tian, S. L., Li, J. Y., Li, M.
G., Yang, Y., Chu, B. W., Petaja, T. K., Kerminen, V-M., He, H., Hao, J. M.,
Kulmala, M., Wang, Y. S., and Zhang, Y. H.: Contrasting trends of PM<sub>2.5</sub>
and surface-ozone concentrations in China from 2013 to 2017, Nat. Sci. Rev.,
7, 1331–1339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa032</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, L., Wang, X., Lu, S., Shao, M., and Ling, Z.: Emission inventory of semi-volatile and intermediate-volatility organic compounds and their effects on secondary organic aerosol over the Pearl River Delta region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8141–8161, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8141-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8141-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Y., Zhang, S. J., Hao, J. M., Liu, H., Wu, X. M., Hu, J. N., Walsh, M.
P., Wallington, T. J., Zhang, M. K., and Stevanovic, S.: On-road vehicle
emissions and their control in China: a review and outlook, Sci. Total
Environ., 574, 332–349, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.040</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, W. Y., Li, J., Wang, W. G., Li, J. L., Ge, M. F., Sun, Y. L., Chen, X.
S., Ge, B. Z., Tong, S. R., Wang, Q. Q., and Wang, Z. F.: Investigating
secondary organic aerosol formation pathways in China during 2014, Atmos.
Environ., 213, 133–147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.057</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Ulbrich, I., Alfarra, M. R., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A. M., and Sun, Y. L.:
Ubiquity and dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in
anthropogenically-influenced northern hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029979" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029979</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., Wang, X. M., Wen, S., Herrmann, H., Yang, W. Q., Huang, X. Y.,
Zhang, Z., Huang, Z. H., He, Q. F., and George, C.: On-road vehicle emissions
of glyoxal and methylglyoxal from tunnel tests in urban Guangzhou, China,
Atmos. Environ., 127, 55–60, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.017</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., Yang, W. Q., Huang, Z. H., Liu, D., Simpson, I., Blake, D. R.,
George, C., and Wang, X. M.: Leakage rates of refrigerants CFC-12, HCFC-22,
and HFC-134a from operating mobile air conditioning systems in Guangzhou,
China: tests inside a busy urban tunnel under hot and humid weather
conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 4, 481–486,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00445" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00445</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., Yang, W. Q., Simpson, I., Huang, X. Y., Yu, J. Z., Huang, Z.
H., Wang, Z. Y., Zhang, Z., Liu, D., Huang, Z. Z., Wang, Y. J., Pei, C.
L.,Shao, M., Blake, D. R., Zheng, J. Y., Huang, Z. J., and Wang, X. M.:
Decadal changes in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from
on-road vehicles with intensified automobile pollution control: case study
in a busy urban tunnel in South China, Environ. Pollut., 233, 806–819,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.133" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.133</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., Deng, W., Hu, Q. H., Wu, Z. F., Yang, W. Q., Zhang, H. N.,
Wang, Z. Y., Fang, Z., Zhu, M., Li, S., Song, W., Ding, X., and Wang, X. M.:
Comparison between idling and cruising gasoline vehicles in primary
emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation during photochemical
ageing, Sci. Total Environ., 772, 137934,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137934" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137934</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y. L., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., Tkacik, D. S., de Gouw, J. A.,
Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., Borbon, A., and Robinson, A. L.:
Intermediate-volatility organic compounds: a large source of secondary
organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 13743–13750,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5035188" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es5035188</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y. L., Nguyen, N. T., Presto, A. A., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., and
Robinson, A. L.: Intermediate volatility organic compound emissions from
on-road diesel Vehicles: chemical composition, emission factors, and
estimated secondary organic aerosol production, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
11516–11526, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02841" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02841</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y. L., Nguyen, N. T., Presto, A. A., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., and
Robinson, A. L.: Intermediate volatility organic compound emissions from
on-road gasoline vehicles and small off-road gasoline engines, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 50, 4554–4563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06247" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06247</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
