<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-20-8867-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Multidecadal trend analysis of in situ aerosol radiative properties around the world</article-title><alt-title>Multidecadal trend analysis of in situ aerosol radiative properties</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Multidecadal trend analysis of in situ aerosol radiative properties}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M. Collaud Coen et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Collaud Coen</surname><given-names>Martine</given-names></name>
          <email>martine.collaudcoen@meteoswiss.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6482-2941</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Andrews</surname><given-names>Elisabeth</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-024X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Alastuey</surname><given-names>Andrés</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5453-5495</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Arsov</surname><given-names>Todor Petkov</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Backman</surname><given-names>John</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4444-8777</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Brem</surname><given-names>Benjamin T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6211-2815</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Bukowiecki</surname><given-names>Nicolas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-8553</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Couret</surname><given-names>Cédric</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1874-9883</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff10">
          <name><surname>Eleftheriadis</surname><given-names>Konstantinos</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-4905</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11">
          <name><surname>Flentje</surname><given-names>Harald</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff12">
          <name><surname>Fiebig</surname><given-names>Markus</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3380-3470</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Gysel-Beer</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7453-1264</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff13">
          <name><surname>Hand</surname><given-names>Jenny L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4644-2459</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff14">
          <name><surname>Hoffer</surname><given-names>András</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff15">
          <name><surname>Hooda</surname><given-names>Rakesh</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff16">
          <name><surname>Hueglin</surname><given-names>Christoph</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6973-522X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff17">
          <name><surname>Joubert</surname><given-names>Warren</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff18">
          <name><surname>Keywood</surname><given-names>Melita</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9953-6806</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff19">
          <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Jeong Eun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff20">
          <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Sang-Woo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff17">
          <name><surname>Labuschagne</surname><given-names>Casper</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7125-0029</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff21">
          <name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Neng-Huei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff12">
          <name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Yong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff12">
          <name><surname>Lund Myhre</surname><given-names>Cathrine</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3587-5926</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff22">
          <name><surname>Luoma</surname><given-names>Krista</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8841-3050</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff23 aff24">
          <name><surname>Lyamani</surname><given-names>Hassan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6386-1102</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff25">
          <name><surname>Marinoni</surname><given-names>Angela</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6580-7126</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff26">
          <name><surname>Mayol-Bracero</surname><given-names>Olga L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8760-0743</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff27">
          <name><surname>Mihalopoulos</surname><given-names>Nikos</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Pandolfi</surname><given-names>Marco</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff28">
          <name><surname>Prats</surname><given-names>Natalia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff29">
          <name><surname>Prenni</surname><given-names>Anthony J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff30">
          <name><surname>Putaud</surname><given-names>Jean-Philippe</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Ries</surname><given-names>Ludwig</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8545-6397</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff18">
          <name><surname>Reisen</surname><given-names>Fabienne</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff31">
          <name><surname>Sellegri</surname><given-names>Karine</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff32">
          <name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>Sangeeta</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Sheridan</surname><given-names>Patrick</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff33">
          <name><surname>Sherman</surname><given-names>James Patrick</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff34">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Junying</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff23 aff24">
          <name><surname>Titos</surname><given-names>Gloria</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3630-5079</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff26">
          <name><surname>Torres</surname><given-names>Elvis</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff35">
          <name><surname>Tuch</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff36">
          <name><surname>Weller</surname><given-names>Rolf</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4880-5572</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff35">
          <name><surname>Wiedensohler</surname><given-names>Alfred</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff37 aff38">
          <name><surname>Zieger</surname><given-names>Paul</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7000-6879</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff39 aff40 aff41">
          <name><surname>Laj</surname><given-names>Paolo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, MeteoSwiss, Payerne,
Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences,
University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>NOAA/Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA),
Spanish Research Council (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Bulgarian
Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Atmospheric composition research, Finnish Meteorological Institute,
Helsinki, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute,
Villigen PSI, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Environmental Sciences,
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>German Environment Agency (UBA), Zugspitze, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Institute of Nuclear and Radiological Science &amp; Technology,
Energy &amp; Safety N.C.S.R. “Demokritos”, Attiki, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>German Weather Service, Meteorological Observatory Hohenpeissenberg,
Hohenpeißenberg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff12"><label>12</label><institution>NILU – Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff13"><label>13</label><institution>Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere (CIRA),
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff14"><label>14</label><institution>MTA-PE Air Chemistry Research Group, Veszprém, Hungary</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff15"><label>15</label><institution>The Energy and Resources Institute, IHC, Lodhi Road, New Delhi,
India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff16"><label>16</label><institution>Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and
Technology, Duebendorf, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff17"><label>17</label><institution>South African Weather Service, Research Department, Stellenbosch,
South Africa</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff18"><label>18</label><institution>CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, PMB1 Aspendale VIC, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff19"><label>19</label><institution>Environmental Meteorology Research Division, National Institute of
Meteorological Sciences, Seogwipo, Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff20"><label>20</label><institution>School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National
University, Seoul, Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff21"><label>21</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Central University,
Taoyuan, Taiwan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff22"><label>22</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, University of
Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff23"><label>23</label><institution>Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research, IISTA-CEAMA,
University of Granada, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Junta de Andalucía, Granada, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff24"><label>24</label><institution>Department of Applied Physics, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff25"><label>25</label><institution>Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, National Research
Council of Italy, Bologna, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff26"><label>26</label><institution>University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff27"><label>27</label><institution>Environmental Chemistry Processes Laboratory, Department of
Chemistry, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff28"><label>28</label><institution>Izaña Atmospheric Research Center, State Meteorological Agency
(AEMET), Tenerife, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff29"><label>29</label><institution>National Park Service, Air Resources Division, Lakewood, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff30"><label>30</label><institution>European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff31"><label>31</label><institution>Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Laboratoire de
Météorologie Physique (LaMP), Clermont-Ferrand, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff32"><label>32</label><institution>Climate Chemistry Measurements Research, Climate Research Division,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?>
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff33"><label>33</label><institution>Department of Physics and Astronomy, Appalachian State University,
Boone, NC, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff34"><label>34</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather &amp; Key Laboratory of
Atmospheric Chemistry of CMA, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences,
Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff35"><label>35</label><institution>Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research (TROPOS), Leipzig,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff36"><label>36</label><institution>Glaciology Department, Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz Zentrum
für Polar- und Meeresforschung, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Bremerhaven, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff37"><label>37</label><institution>Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry,
Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff38"><label>38</label><institution>Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm,
Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff39"><label>39</label><institution>Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble-INP, IGE, 38000 Grenoble,
France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff40"><label>40</label><institution>CNR-ISAC, National Research Council of Italy – Institute of
Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Bologna, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff41"><label>41</label><institution>University of Helsinki, Atmospheric Science division, Helsinki,
Finland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Martine Collaud Coen (martine.collaudcoen@meteoswiss.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>8867</fpage><lpage>8908</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>January</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>May</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 Martine Collaud Coen et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e790">In order to assess the evolution of aerosol parameters affecting climate
change, a long-term trend analysis of aerosol optical properties was
performed on time series from 52 stations situated across five continents.
The time series of measured scattering, backscattering and absorption
coefficients as well as the derived single scattering albedo, backscattering
fraction, scattering and absorption Ångström exponents covered at
least 10 years and up to 40 years for some stations. The non-parametric
seasonal Mann–Kendall (MK) statistical test associated with several
pre-whitening methods and with Sen's slope was used as the main trend analysis method. Comparisons with general least mean square associated with autoregressive bootstrap (GLS/ARB) and with standard least mean square analysis (LMS) enabled confirmation of the detected MK statistically
significant trends and the assessment of advantages and limitations of each
method. Currently, scattering and backscattering coefficient trends are
mostly decreasing in Europe and North America and are not statistically
significant in Asia, while polar stations exhibit a mix of increasing and
decreasing trends. A few increasing trends are also found at some stations
in North America and Australia. Absorption coefficient time series also
exhibit primarily decreasing trends. For single scattering albedo, 52 % of
the sites exhibit statistically significant positive trends, mostly in Asia,
eastern/northern Europe and the Arctic, 22 % of sites exhibit statistically significant negative trends, mostly in central Europe and central North
America, while the remaining 26 % of sites have trends which are not statistically significant. In addition to evaluating trends for the overall
time series, the evolution of the trends in sequential 10-year segments was also analyzed. For scattering and backscattering, statistically significant
increasing 10-year trends are primarily found for earlier periods (10-year trends ending in 2010–2015) for polar stations and Mauna Loa. For most of
the stations, the present-day statistically significant decreasing 10-year trends of the single scattering albedo were preceded by not statistically
significant and statistically significant increasing 10-year trends. The effect of air pollution abatement policies in continental North America is
very obvious in the 10-year trends of the scattering coefficient – there is a shift to statistically significant negative trends in 2009–2012 for all
stations in the eastern and central USA. This long-term trend analysis of aerosol radiative properties with a broad spatial coverage provides insight
into potential aerosol effects on climate changes.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page8868?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e802">Climate change has been considered a premier global problem in the scientific community for decades. Thirty years ago, the community organized
to produce the first Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report
(IPCC, 1990) about the state of scientific, technical and socio-economic
knowledge on climate change, its impacts and future risks, and options for
reducing the rate at which climate change was taking place. Aerosols have
been recognized as an important active climate forcing agent since the
1970s and, in the last IPCC report (IPCC, 2013), the impact of aerosols on the atmosphere was still considered to be one of the most significant and
uncertain aspects of climate change projections and, for the first time,
decadal trend analysis of in situ aerosol optical properties around the world was reported.</p>
      <p id="d1e805">Aerosol optical properties are the relevant parameters that determine the
radiative forcing of particulate matter. While some of these optical
properties are currently measured by satellite (Choi et al., 2019), airborne
and ground-based remote sensing (REM) technologies<?pagebreak page8869?> (<uri>https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020, <uri>https://www.earlinet.org/</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020), the
ground-based, in situ measurements represent some of the longest time series, allowing assessment of the long-term time evolution of aerosol
radiative properties in the lower troposphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e814">The first in situ measurement network began in the mid 1970s at several remote locations (Bodhaine et al., 1995). Through national and international programs and/or on an individual organization's initiatives, the number of stations with systematic aerosol monitoring activities in regional
background locations has continued to increase since the 1990s. As of 2017 absorption has been measured for at least 1 year (yr) at 50 sites, for 5 years at
37 sites and for 10 years at 20 sites, while scattering has been measured for at
least 1 year at 56 sites, for 5 years at 45 sites and for 10 years at 30 sites. The
companion paper (Laj et al., 2020) provides a historical view and
a complete description of the present networks for aerosol measurements. The
longest datasets cover up to 40 years of measurements, BRW (40 years), SPO (40 years), and MLO (31 years) (see Table 1 for station acronyms), whereas some stations with long time series recently closed or moved (THD, SGP, MUK, CPT). The
spatial and temporal variability of aerosol properties is extremely high due
to the short lifetime of aerosol particles (on the order of days to weeks),
the wide variety of sources, as well as the chemical and microphysical
processing occurring in the atmosphere; a dense network of stations is
consequently required to obtain a global view of aerosol changes. The
growing number of stations with long-term (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 years) time series of
aerosol particle optical properties – 24 in 2010 (Collaud Coen et al., 2013, hereafter referred to as CC2013) and now 52 in 2016–2018 – is a
positive factor. Detracting from that growth is the continued lack of sites
in South America, Africa, Oceania and Asia.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e828">List of observatories included in this study, arranged
alphabetically by Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW) acronyms, including their names, countries, coordinates and elevation, site environmental characteristic (geographical
category and footprint), size cut, type of nephelometer and absorption
filter photometer deployed, time period used, and nephelometer RH
percentiles.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="2cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="1cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="2.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="1.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="1.8cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="2.2cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="justify" colwidth="2.4cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Sample RH</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GAW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Station</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Site charac-</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5th; 50th; 95th</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">code</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Country</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GPS coordinates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">teristics<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Size cut<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Period<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Period<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">percentile</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ACA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Acadia NP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">44.38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 68.26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 122 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Coast, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 1994–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">46; 75; 98</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Alert</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">82.50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 62.34<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 210 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">P, P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2005–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 2005–2014<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>C, 2014–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0; 4; 23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AMY</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Anmyeon-do</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">KR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">36.54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 126.33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 46 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Coast, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2008–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">AE16, 2008–2009 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>AE31, 2010–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8; 26; 66</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">APP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Appalachian</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">36.21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 81.69<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 1076 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2010–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 2010–2016 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>C, 2016–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0; 17; 41</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Big Bend NP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">29.30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 103.18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 1052 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, DE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 1998–2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14; 41; 78</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BEO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Moussala</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">BG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">42.18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 23.59<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 2925 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, Mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2008–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4; 15; 26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BIR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Birkenes</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58.38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 8.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>220 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2010–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 2010–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11; 21; 38</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BND</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bondville</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40.05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 88.37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 213 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 1995–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 1998–2012 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>C, 2012–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5; 22; 47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BRW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Barrow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 156.61<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 11 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Polar, Coast, P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP–PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>&amp; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">R, 1978–1997 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>T, 1997–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 1998–2014 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>C, 2014–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0; 7; 26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CGO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cape Grim</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AU</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40.68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 144.69<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 94 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Coast, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">E, 2006–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">M, 2008–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0; 9; 23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CMN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monte Cimone</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">IT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">44.17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 10.68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 2165 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, Mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">M, 2008–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14; 34; 57</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CPR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cape San Juan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 65.62<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 65 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Coast, F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2005–2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 2007–2014 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>C, 2014–2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">31; 48; 70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CPT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cape Point</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ZA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34.35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 18.49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 230 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Coast, Mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2006–2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 2006–2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">25; 36; 51</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CRG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Columbia River George</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45.66<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 121.00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 178 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 1994–2004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">35; 63; 92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EGB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Egbert</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">44.23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 79.78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 255 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2010–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 2010–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6; 23; 60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FKL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Finokalia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35.34<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 25.67<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 150 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Coast, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">AE21, 2004–2010 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>AE31, 2011–2014 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>AE33, 2015–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">29; 64; 90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GBN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Great Basin NP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">39.01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 114.22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 2065 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, DE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 2008–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14; 41; 80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GLR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Glacier NP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48.51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 114.00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 976 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 2008–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">48; 78; 95</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GSM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Great Smoky<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Mountain NP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35.63<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 83.94<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 810 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 1994–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">40; 73; 98</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GSN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gosan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">KR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33.28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 126.17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 72 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Coast, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2008–2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">AE31, 2008–2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14; 30; 64</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HGC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Grand Canyon<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>NP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35.97<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 111.98<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 2267 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 1998–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">18; 45; 91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HPB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hohenpeissen-<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>berg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">47.80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 11.01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 985 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2006–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">M, 2004–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9; 23; 44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IPR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ispra</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">IT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45.80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 8.63<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 209 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, U</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2004–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">AE31, 2004–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6; 24; 56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2351">Continued.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="2cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="1cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="2.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="1.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="1.8cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="2.2cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="justify" colwidth="2.4cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Sample RH</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GAW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Station</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Site charac-</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5th; 50th; 95th</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">code</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Country</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GPS coordinates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">teristics<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Size cut<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Period<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Period<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">percentile</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IZO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Izana</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ES</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.31<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 16.50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 2373 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, Mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2009–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">M, 2007–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5; 15; 33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">JFJ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jungfraujoch</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46.55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 7.99<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>3580 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, Mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 1996–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">AE31, 2002–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0; 7; 16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KPS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">K-Pustza</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HU</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46.97<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 19.58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 125 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2008–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 2008–2012 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>C, 2012–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11; 24; 44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LLN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lulin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.47<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 120.87<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 2862 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, F, Mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2009–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 2009–2011 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>C, 2012–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5; 16; 44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MCN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mammoth Caves NP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 86.15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 235 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 1993–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">48; 78; 99</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MEL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Melpitz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">51.53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 12.93<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 86 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, U</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2007–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">M, 2007–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7; 20; 34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MLO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mauna Loa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19.54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 155.58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 3397 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, Mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2000–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">MRI, 1988–1999 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>P, 2000–2013 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>C, 2013–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0; 6; 18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MRN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mount Rainier<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>NP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46.76<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 122.12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 439 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 1993–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">68; 92; 100</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MSY</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Montseny</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ES</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41.78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 2.36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>700 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">E, 2010–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">M, 2009–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">15; 26; 43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MUK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mukteshwar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">IN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">29.44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 79.62<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 2180 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, Mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">E, 2006–2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">AE31, 2006–2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2; 7; 15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MZW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mt. Zirkel<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Wilderness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40.54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 106.68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 3243 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 1994–2008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">28; 65; 92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NCC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">National Capitol Central</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38.90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 77.04<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 514 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, U</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 2004–2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">38; 63; 90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NMY</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Neumayer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">70.67<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 8.27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>42 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Polar, Coast, Mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2009–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">M, 2007–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0; 2; 10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PAL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pallas</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">FI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67.97<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 24.12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 560 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Polar, Pristine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>- PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2000–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">M, 2008–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4; 12; 32</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PAY</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Payerne</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46.81<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 6.94<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>490 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">AE31, 2009–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PUY</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Puy de Dôme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">FR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45.77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 2.97<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1465 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, Mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2009–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">M, 2009–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10; 26; 49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RMN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rocky Mountain NP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40.28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 105.55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 2760 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 2008–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">21; 48; 88</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SCN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sycamore Canyon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35.14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 111.97<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 2046 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 1999–2009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17; 50; 97</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SGP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Southern Great<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Plains</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">36.60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 97.50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 318 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 1997–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 2007–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5; 25; 53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SHN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shenandoah</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38.52<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 78.44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 1074 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O, 1997–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">41; 78; 100</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SMR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hyytiala</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">FI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">61.85<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 24.29<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 181 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2007–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">AE31, 2007–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4; 14; 47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SPO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">South Pole</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">90.00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 24.80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 2841 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Polar, P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 1979–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0; 0; 0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SUM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Summit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 38.48<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 3238 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Polar, P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">AE16, 2006–2016 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>C, 2016–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0; 0; 5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">THD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Trinidad Head</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41.05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 124.15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 107 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Coast, RB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2003–2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 2003–2013 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>C, 2013–2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16; 27; 38</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3894">Continued.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="2cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="1cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="2.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="1.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="1.8cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="2.2cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="justify" colwidth="2.4cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Sample RH</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GAW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Station</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Site charac-</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5th; 50th; 95th</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">code</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Country</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GPS coordinates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">teristics<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Size cut<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Period<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Period<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">percentile</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TIK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tiksi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RU</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.59<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 128.92<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 8 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Polar, Coast, RG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">AE31, 2010–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UGR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Granada</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ES</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 3.61<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>680 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Con, U</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2006–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">M, 2006–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14; 29; 46</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mount Waliguan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">36.29<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 100.90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 3810 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, Mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2008–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 2008–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0; 8; 23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ZEP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Zeppelin Mountain</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">78.91<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 11.89<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 475 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Polar, Mt, P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">T, 2005–2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">P, 2005–2018 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>AE31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0; 7; 17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ZSF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Zugspitze-Schneefernerhaus</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">47.42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 10.58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 2671 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mt, Mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TSP and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">M, 2009–2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4; 13; 24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3897"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Geographical category: Mountain: Mt, Polar: P, Continental: Con, Coastal: coast.
Footprint: Rural background: RB, Forest: F, Desert: DE, (Sub-)Urban: U, Pristine: P Mixed: Mix.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> the mention of two size cuts separated by “–” corresponds to a modification of inlet during the tim series, whereas the “&amp;” corresponds to measurements at two size cuts.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> T: TSI nephelometer, O: Optec nephelometer, R: Radiance Research nephelometer; E3: Ecotech nephelometer Aurora 3000, E4: Ecotech nephelometer Aurora 4000.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> AE16(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8) 120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AE22 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AE31 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AE33 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5): Aethalometer, P1: one-wavelength or P3: three-wavelength PSAP, M: MAAP, C: NOAA CLAP, ET: ES95L Thermo 5012<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e4475">Long-term measurements are the only possible approach for detecting change
in atmospheric composition resulting from either changes in natural or
anthropogenic emissions and/or changes in atmospheric processes and sinks.
However, detecting long-term trends of aerosol optical properties remains a
challenge, due to their high natural variability, uncertainties caused by
changes and biases in measurement methodology, the ill-defined statistical
distribution of the parameters, the presence of high autocorrelation in
aerosol parameters, as well as the occasional issues regarding traceability
of historic operating procedures. Trend analysis can only be performed on
time series without breakpoints or on homogenized time series that account
for changes in measurement conditions (e.g., relocations, instrument calibration/repair/upgrades, inlet changes) (CC2013). Once homogenized datasets are available, appropriate techniques must be used to identify
potential trends. The trend analysis methodology must take into account the
non-normal distribution of most aerosol parameters, the high autocorrelation
of the parameters, and the presence of gaps and negatives in the datasets.</p>
      <p id="d1e4478">In this current analysis, a considerable effort was made to detect time
series breakpoints, to find explanations for them in the logbooks and station history and, if possible, to correct or homogenize the time series.
These homogenized time series were then subjected to an array of statistical
tests to identify trends. These tests include (1) the non-parametric seasonal Mann–Kendall test (hereafter referred to as the MK test) associated with Sen's slope. The applied MK test is however applied with a new pre-whitening method (Collaud Coen et al., 2020a), (2) a
generalized least squares (GLS) method associated with a Monte Carlo bootstrap algorithm and (3) the least mean squares fit (LMS). While the MK
test with pre-whitening was considered the most robust method, the other
tests were included to allow a comparison between various simple and
frequently used methods.</p>
      <?pagebreak page8872?><p id="d1e4482">The first long-term trend analyses of aerosol optical properties, number
concentration and particle size distribution (CC2013; Asmi et al., 2013)
covered 2001–2010 as the shortest period and longer periods if data were
available. The main observations were (1) a general statistically significant (ss) – at 95 % confidence level – decrease in number
concentration, scattering and absorption coefficients in North America, (2) a ss decrease in number concentration in northeastern Europe, (3) no ss trends in central Europe for any of the parameters and (4) no ss scattering
coefficient trends but increasing 10-year absorption coefficient and number concentration trends in the polar regions. These trends were related to the decrease in anthropogenic primary aerosol emissions and in precursors of
secondary aerosol formation. The high-altitude station Mauna Loa (MLO) in the Pacific was unique in exhibiting increasing optical property trends that were mostly attributed to long-range transport from Asia. The results
in CC2013 are in line with the 1996–2013 trend analysis at the BND and SGP
stations in North America (Sherman et al., 2015) showing a decreasing scattering coefficient and a sub-micron scattering fraction and increasing
backscattering fraction. More recently, Pandolfi et al. (2018) presented the
long-term trends of in situ surface aerosol particle optical properties (scattering) measured in Europe until 2015. The ss decreasing trends of
aerosol particle scattering observed in Europe at around 40 % of the
stations (mostly in Nordic and Baltic countries and southwestern Europe)
were attributed to the implementation of continental to local emission
mitigation strategies. Pandolfi et al. (2018) also reported that the
scattering Ångström exponent decreased at around 20 % for the
European stations included in their study (at remote Nordic and Baltic
locations and at two mountain sites in central and eastern Europe), whereas
an increase was observed at 15 % of the stations (one urban site in
southwestern Europe and one in central Europe). In the same study, the
backscattering fraction was observed to increase. Trends in horizontal
visibility synoptic observations over 1929–2013 from 4000 stations over the
USA, Europe and Asia (Li et al., 2016) generally agreed with extinction coefficient trends, with a significant decrease in all regions but with different evolutions of the trends. Hand et al. (2014) also found a
significant drop of the ambient light extinction coefficient at all IMPROVE
(Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environment, <uri>http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/Improve/</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020) stations over the 1990s through
2011, with a larger decrease in the eastern USA. To our knowledge, no further trend analyses of surface in situ aerosol optical properties involving a network of stations or several stations have been published up to now.</p>
      <p id="d1e4488">This study is part of the SARGAN (in-Situ AeRosol GAW observing Network)
initiative (see the companion paper by Laj et al., 2020) with the objective of supporting a global aerosol monitoring network to become a GCOS
(Global Climate Observing System) associated network. This trend analysis is
intended to answer the following questions.
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4493">Are there homogeneous long-term trends of in situ aerosol optical properties over the covered regions of the world? Do they differ as a function of the
length of the data series? How do the trends evolve with time?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4497">Are there regional similarities or differences in the observed trends among
stations? Are there similarities or differences in trends among aerosol
parameters at regional and continental scales?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4501">How do the observed optical property trends compare with trends in other
aerosol and gaseous properties reported in the literature?</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e4504">The results of this study provide the best representation of change in
surface aerosol optical properties considering the available in situ aerosol optical property datasets and highlight the possible side-effects of air pollution control policies on radiative forcing.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e4509">Map of stations with their GAW acronyms.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Measurement sites</title>
      <p id="d1e4533">The long-term trend analysis presented in this study analyzes in situ aerosol time series from 52 observatories worldwide shown in Fig. 1 with
site information listed in Table 1. The network, which is a subset of the
station network described in Laj et al. (2020), comprises 16
stations in Europe, 21 in North America, 5 in Asia, 2 in Africa, 6 in the polar regions and 2 in the southwestern Pacific. The stations included in this study are primarily located in rural or remote areas and are
expected to exhibit regional- to large-scale representativeness (e.g., Wang et al., 2018). Apart from MUK, all the stations are regional or global GAW (Global Atmospheric Watch, <uri>https://gawsis.meteoswiss.ch/GAWSIS//index.html#/</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020) sites or IMPROVE
stations. The GAW aerosol data are archived at and available from the World
Data Centre for Aerosol (WDCA, <uri>http://www.gaw-wdca.org</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020) located
at the Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU). The WDCA data repository
is the EBAS database (<uri>http://ebas.nilu.no</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020), an e-infrastructure shared with other frameworks targeting atmospheric aerosol properties, such
as the Co-operative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the
Long-range Transmission of Air pollutants in Europe (EMEP) and the European
Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases Research InfraStructure Network (ACTRIS).
The IMPROVE data are available from the IMPROVE website (<uri>http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/Improve/data-page/</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020) and from the WDCA. To ensure that the long-term trend analysis was performed on homogeneous
time series, a substantial effort of quality control, rupture detection and
homogenization (see Sect. 2.4) was performed in close collaboration with each station's operator on the data.<?pagebreak page8873?> As has been noted in previous papers, it is critical to have outside review of data to improve the quality of long-term
time series (CC2013; Asmi et al., 2013). The final time series used in this analysis are available from the following DOI: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21336/c4dy-yw57" ext-link-type="DOI">10.21336/c4dy-yw57</ext-link>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4551">The stations' environments were classified into four types (continental,
coastal, mountain, or polar) that are represented by 22, 8, 16 and 7 time
series, respectively. The type of measured aerosol at each site is further
characterized by their footprints comprising six types (rural background, forest, desert, (sub)-urban, pristine and mixed). While the environments of
Europe, North America and the polar regions are fairly well represented, the number of long-term stations in the rest of the world is currently quite
low, resulting in a lack of information from the largest deserts (e.g., Sahara, Gobi, Australian, Arabian, Atacama), from many mountain ranges (e.g.,
Himalaya, Andes, Southern Great Escarpment, Great Dividing Range, Urals) and from whole continents (South America (no site), Africa (one island in the Atlantic and one coastal site), and Australia (one coastal site)). Some
stations from these underrepresented areas currently have 4 to 7 years of
measurements available and will potentially be used for trend analyses in
the future (see Table 3 in Laj et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e4554">Sites were chosen based on the following criteria: (1) availability of at
least 10 years of continuous data (two sites with 9 years and one site with 8 years of
data for at least one parameter have also been included to improve spatial
coverage (CPT, EGB and GSN, respectively)); (2) continuous measurements without ruptures in the aerosol light scattering and/or absorption
measurement; (3) submission of quality-assured data to the WMO WDCA data
repository; and (4) responsiveness of site operators to questions concerning data quality and homogeneity.</p>
      <p id="d1e4557">The longest time series with 40 years of measurements are the Arctic and
Antarctic stations of BRW and SPO, followed by the high-altitude MLO station (31 years). During the 1990s NOAA began extending their network (Andrews et al., 2019), the IMPROVE network installed numerous stations in the USA (Malm
et al., 1994), and the first long-term measurements in Europe, JFJ
(Bukowiecki et al., 2016) and HPB, began in 1995. To have the largest
representativity and to minimize the number of stations with less than 10 years
of measurement, the current long-term trends were computed from time series
ending in 2016, 2017 or 2018 (whichever year was most recently available).
To obtain an overview of the long-term trend evolution in the past 40 years, all stations with at least 10 years of measurements were considered (see results in Sect. 3.2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Instruments</title>
      <p id="d1e4568">The relevant instruments operating at each site are listed in Table 1 and
further instrument details are given in the Supplement (Table S1). Some particular instrumental features that could influence the trend
analysis or comparison between stations are briefly discussed below.</p>
      <p id="d1e4571">Nephelometers measure aerosol light scattering over a truncated angular
range (Müller et al., 2009, and references therein), leading to non-idealities often called “truncation error”. The truncation adjustment
accounts for scattering over the angles outside the measurement range and
non-ideality of the light source. All TSI nephelometer scattering and
backscattering sets were adjusted for truncation and<?pagebreak page8874?> instrument
non-idealities using the Anderson and Ogren (1998) correction. Thus, for
times when enhanced amounts of large diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m)
particles are present, the measured scattering will be lower than true
scattering by a substantial amount since the truncation correction increases
with particle size (Anderson and Ogren, 1998; Molenar et al., 1997). The
Radiance Research nephelometer has similar truncation characteristics to the TSI nephelometer (Müller et al., 2009). The Optec nephelometer measures
over a wider angular range (Molenar, 1997) than the other nephelometers and,
like the Radiance Research measurements, the scattering has not been
corrected for truncation in this study. The Optec nephelometers measure at
ambient conditions with no size cut (they are open-air instruments) so they can sample the very large particles present due to both hygroscopic growth
at high humidities and/or the occurrence of precipitation, fog, dust,
pollen, etc. The Ecotech nephelometers have a similar angular range to the TSI nephelometers, and the measurements are corrected for truncation errors
using the Müller correction (Müller et al., 2011b), adapted from
the Anderson and Ogren correction.</p>
      <p id="d1e4597">For better comparability of aerosol properties amongst sites and to minimize
the confounding effects of water associated with the aerosol, GAW recommends
drying the sample air to RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 % (WMO/GAW report 227, 2016).
While most of the nephelometer scattering time series are accompanied by
sample RH measurements, this was not the case for all stations and for the
entire measurement period. The calculated RH trends are therefore not always
complete. Many breakpoints were detected in sample RH data and exchanges
with the individual station operators revealed that humidity sensors often suffer
from artifacts, offsets, and modifications that were not considered problematic. These sensor problems were often not resolved due to the secondary status of this housekeeping diagnostic, leading to problematic time series. Nonetheless, apart from the IMPROVE network, the majority of
nephelometers appeared to have sampled at RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %. The IMPROVE
scattering measurements were analyzed at the measurement conditions with
some constraints on acceptable scattering values, although the IMPROVE
network recommends screening the data when RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 % (Prenni et
al., 2019). For this study and according to CC2013, the IMPROVE scattering
coefficient was restricted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values lower than 500 M m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for stations in the eastern USA (ACA, GSM, MCN and SHN) and lower
than 100 M m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for stations in the western USA to minimize the influence
of rain, fog, snow and ice. These screening constraints minimized the issues
associated with high RH but do not correspond to a screening based on RH.</p>
      <p id="d1e4657">Measurement of the absorption coefficient was always performed by some type
of filter-based photometer but relied on a variety of instruments. These
instruments include Multi-Angle Absorption Photometers (MAAPs), Particle Soot Absorption Photometers (PSAPs) and Continuous Light Absorption
Photometers (CLAPs), as well as various models of the Aethalometer (AE16, AE21, AE31 and AE33). All these instruments suffer from various artifacts, from which the loading effect can influence the wavelength dependence.
However, the largest uncertainty in filter-based photometer measurements
lies in the effect of the multiple scattering of light into the filter
matrix, leading to over-prediction of absorption aerosol (e.g., Bond et al., 1999; Lack et al., 2008; Müller et al., 2011a; Collaud Coen et al.,
2010; Bernardoni et al., 2019). This artifact is roughly corrected by the multiple scattering constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and is probably largest for the
Aethalometer and smallest for the MAAP.</p>
      <p id="d1e4672">The ACTRIS community has suggested that Level 2 AE31 data submitted to EBAS
utilize a multiple scattering constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; most of the analyzed
AE31 time series were corrected with this new rule. The AE33 adds a
simultaneous measurement of the light transmission through a second filter
spot sampling the same air at a different flow rate associated with a
real-time compensation algorithm. This two-spot technique allows for correction of the filter loading artifact. This improvement, however, has no
effect on the largest artifact (multiple scattering artifact) and, as of yet, there is no agreed upon correction for the AE33 by the aerosol
community. Previous AE models used a white light diode (AE10 and AE16) and a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is usually applied. At FKL, the AE21 used a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and the AE33 a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The various versions of the Aethalometer
require then different corrections, whereas the real <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value depends
on the filter and on the aerosol type. For background rural aerosol, the
real <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is between 2.5 and 4.5 (Collaud Coen et al., 2010;
Bernardoni et al., 2019), the Asian plume has a relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
between 4 and 5.5 (Kim et al., 2018), in the Arctic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is suggested to be 3.45 (Backman et al., 2017), whereas pure mineral dust leads to a lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.75–2.56 (Di Biagio et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e4791">The MAAP measures not only the light transmission through the filter, but also the light backscattered at two different angles. This design takes into
account the scattering and multiple scattering artifacts (see Collaud Coen et al., 2010), which are two of the most significant artifacts for
filter-based absorption photometers so that no correction is needed
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The MAAP measured absorption coefficient is consequently
more reliable.</p>
      <p id="d1e4809">The CLAP was developed by NOAA as a replacement for the PSAP (Ogren et al.,
2017). The CLAP was designed to have the same optical characteristics as the
PSAP so that either the Bond et al. (1999) correction along with the Ogren (2010) update for wavelength and spot size correction or the Virkkula et al. (2005, 2010) corrections can be applied to account for scattering artifacts
at multiple wavelengths as well as other instrument non-idealities (e.g., filter-loading artifacts, variability in spot size and flow calibrations). These correction algorithms rely on co-located scattering measurements from
a nephelometer and may have issues in the presence of large, primarily
scattering aerosol such as sea salt or<?pagebreak page8875?> dust (e.g., Bond et al., 1999) and
also may not work well when organic aerosol is abundant (e.g., Lack et al.,
2008).</p>
      <p id="d1e4812">The differences in instrumentation, measurement conditions and
post-processing data treatment do not allow the absolute values of aerosol
optical parameters for all sites to be compared; however, because there was
consistency of data treatment for each individual time series, the trends
across the different sites can be compared.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Aerosol optical properties</title>
      <p id="d1e4823">The data used in this paper consist of hourly-averaged, quality-checked,
spectral light scattering (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), backscattering (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and absorption (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) measurements. The quality
checks correspond to the Level 2 requirements of EBAS (Laj et al., 2020). After further visual quality control by the authors, the hourly data
were aggregated into daily medians with the requirement that at least 25 %
of the daily data be valid. The median was chosen to minimize the effect of
extreme values on the average since the measured parameters are strongly not
normally distributed and most of the calculated parameters also do not
follow a normal distribution. Such a low requirement for data coverage was
chosen since six hourly measurements a day corresponds to half of the potential data coverage at many of the NOAA stations, where the operation
mode consists of alternating between PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> size cutoff on a
sub-hourly basis (Andrews et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e4877">All the nephelometers and the multi-wavelength absorption photometers
measure at a green wavelength (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 525–550 nm), which is the
channel for which the parameters are reported. For the AE31 and AE33 models,
the 520 nm channel was chosen. At several sites, the light absorption was
measured by white light (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 840–880 nm) Aethalometers (AE16),
two-channel Aethalometers (AE21) using 370 and 880 nm or by MAAPs (Multi-Angle Absorption Photometers) at 637 nm (Müller et al., 2011a), requiring the use of another wavelength, typically a red wavelength. In some
cases, the blue or red wavelength was preferred due to inhomogeneities or
gaps in the green data. Since the trend analysis is not sensitive to the
multiplication by a constant, the data series used to determine scattering
and absorption trends were not adjusted to 550 nm.</p>
      <p id="d1e4894">In addition to the measured parameters, the following parameters were
computed when the appropriate measurements were available:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4899">backscatter fraction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4925">scattering Ångström exponent, <?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp,1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp,2</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4984">absorption Ångström exponent, <?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap,1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap,2</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or by a linear fit between the logarithm of the seven absorption coefficients as a function of the logarithm of the seven wavelengths of the Aethalometers (AE31 and
AE33), and</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e5043">single scattering albedo, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</p></list-item></list>
where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the scattering coefficient at wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the hemispheric backscattering coefficient, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the absorption
coefficient.</p>
      <p id="d1e5147"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were usually computed from the blue
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 450 nm) and green wavelengths, because the red channel of
the nephelometers was frequently less stable and more prone to rupture in
the time series due to calibrations or instrument changes. However, in some
cases, other wavelength pairs were used to utilize the longest time series. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> computed from AE31 and AE33 is always more homogeneous if fitted on the seven wavelengths, so that the fitted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was always chosen for these two instruments.</p>
      <p id="d1e5201">The single scattering albedo was computed from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was adjusted to match the nephelometer green
wavelength with an assumed absorption Ångström exponent of one
(i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dependence). In order to maintain similar data treatment
for absorption instruments with single or multiple wavelengths, the measured
absorption Ångström exponents were not used for the wavelength
adjustment for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculation.</p>
      <p id="d1e5260">It should be recalled that all parameters calculated using ratios of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may have higher
uncertainties for two reasons: (1) the ratio of two similar values has a
larger uncertainty than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainties and (2) the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> difference between the
wavelengths depends on the nephelometer calibration that is performed
independently for each wavelength. These uncertainties are particularly
enhanced for clean locations with low aerosol loading.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Discontinuities, data consistency and homogenization</title>
      <p id="d1e5349">Long-term climate analyses require homogeneous time series to be accurate. A
homogeneous climate time series is defined as one where variations are
caused only by variations in weather and climate (Conrad and Pollak, 1950)
and in emissions of aerosol particles and their precursor gases. Long-term
climatological time series can be affected by a number of non-climatic
factors called breakpoints (e.g., relocation, instrument upgrades, inlet changes, calibrations, nearby pollution sources) that mask the real climate
variations. The breakpoints can be detected either by subjective visual
inspection or by objective statistical methods (Peterson et al., 1998;
Beaulieu et al., 2007) and must correspond to an event recorded in logbooks
describing the station/instrumental history. Many statistical methods are
only suitable for normally distributed data and cannot therefore be applied
to aerosol optical property measurement without data transformation (Lindau and Venema, 2018). Moreover, they are often applied not only to the
data, but also to ratios or differences between various time series that are not systematically available at all the measuring sites of this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e5352">Visual inspection was used to detect breakpoints and to assess the validity
of the time series to be used for climatic<?pagebreak page8876?> trend analysis. For this study,
each measured and calculated (see Sect. 2.3) parameter at all wavelengths,
as well as all the possible ratios between measured parameters (including
the number concentration if available), at each station were visually
inspected in linear and logarithmic time series plots. The treatment of
minimum and maximum values, outliers and negatives along with the consistency of seasonal cycles were looked at closely when inspecting the time series plots. In addition, the data owners responded to a questionnaire
about potential breakpoints, providing metadata that could be used to
confirm/dismiss possible breakpoints or to accurately locate them. The identified breakpoints were discussed with the data owners, leading to corrections, homogenization, invalidations or splitting of the time series into two parts. In one case (absorption data from SUM measured by AE16 and
CLAP), the two time series were homogenized by multiplying the AE16 data by the median of the ratio between both datasets during the 10.5 months of simultaneous measurements. Only datasets considered homogeneous by the authors and the data owners were analyzed in this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e5355">In the older networks, several modifications likely lead to inhomogeneities
that occurred at sites in the network around the same time. Some of these
include the following.
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e5360">Two of the longest running NOAA stations changed their TSP (total suspended particle) inlets for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> size cuts in the middle of the multi-decade time series (MLO: 2000, BRW: 1997). Some other stations outside
the NOAA network also modified the measurement size cuts over their
long-term measurement period. Usually this change in size cut (TSP to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) did not generate a breakpoint for aerosol optical properties so that the
time series could be considered homogeneous. A differentiation between periods of sampling inside or outside of clouds was not made, even though TSP and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> could respond differently in these situations. In contrast, the modification of TSP or PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> size cuts to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cutoffs usually led to visible breakpoints. PAL is the only station where changes between PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> did not induce a visually obvious breakpoint, likely due to the
minimal presence of supermicron particles at this site.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e5446">The NOAA stations used the single green wavelength PSAP until the years 2005–2007, when they replaced them with a three-wavelength (3w) PSAP (see Table S1). This instrumental change usually did not induce a visually
obvious breakpoint.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e5450">A further instrument change for the absorption coefficient at NOAA sites
occurred in 2013–2015 through the introduction of the 3w CLAP. The 3w PSAP
to 3w CLAP change usually induced no breakpoint in the green absorption
coefficient. The red channel sometimes exhibited a visible breakpoint (APP
and BND), resulting in breakpoints in the absorption Ångström
exponent. In those cases, calculation of the absorption Ångström
exponent with the blue and green channels was preferred.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e5454">The long time series from MLO and JFJ were subject to the removal of
negative values during the first years of measurements until 2000 and 1999,
respectively. The raw data prior to these years were not archived by the
data providers for either site. This change in minimal values does not seem
to produce a clear breakpoint in the sense that the computed trends were not
affected strongly enough to modify the climatic trends.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e5457">To compare long-term trends between stations from various networks,
instruments and operators, instrumentation, measurement conditions and data
treatment consistency is critical, but some lenience amongst stations was
deemed acceptable. Specifically, some discretion was allowed, including whether the datasets had the same corrections applied (e.g., truncation or not), how the sites dealt with sample RH and very low aerosol
amounts, and inlet size cuts. Table 1 includes columns indicating
information about the size cuts and RH conditions at the various sites. No
screening or analysis as a function of cloud amount/clear-sky conditions was done since these criteria/flagging were not available at all stations. Below, the impacts of sample RH, size cut and general instrument
conditions and corrections on trend evaluation are briefly discussed.
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e5462">Humidity: one important factor affecting all aerosol measurements is the relative humidity (RH) at which the measurements are made. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, measurements at controlled RH enable minimization of the confounding effects of aerosol hygroscopic growth, resulting in increases in the amount of scattering aerosol (Nessler et al., 2005; Fierz-Schmidhauser
et al., 2010; Burgos et al., 2019). The disadvantage of making measurements
at low RH is that aerosol hygroscopic properties must be measured or assumed
in order to adjust the aerosol optical properties to ambient conditions. As
noted above (see Sect. 2.2), within the GAW program, recommendations have
been given to measure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at low (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %)
humidities. Apart from the IMPROVE and CPR nephelometers, the instruments
typically operated at RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %, with only six stations having a
RH 95th percentile value larger than 50 % (AMY, CMN, EGB, GSN, IPR
and SGP) but with a median clearly much lower than 50 %. In contrast, the
IMPROVE network instruments measure at near-ambient conditions (Malm et al., 1996). The scattering restriction method (see Sect. 2.2) was chosen in order
to maintain the highest data coverage – simply removing scattering values
associated with RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % from the ambient IMPROVE dataset would have eliminated most of the summertime measurements, particularly for
the eastern USA locations. For all stations with some contribution of<?pagebreak page8877?> scattering made at RH values larger than 50 %, the dry scattering and
backscattering coefficients were calculated by removing values corresponding
to hourly RH median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e5516">Ensuring a low humidity in the nephelometer reduces but does not suppress
the potential influence of the hygroscopic growth on nephelometer
measurements (Zieger et al., 2013). Therefore, if RH data were available,
the RH long-term trends were also computed and their potential effect on the
trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
evaluated (see Sect. 4.1).</p>
      <p id="d1e5559">The filter-based absorption photometers are also sensitive to rapid RH
changes (e.g., Anderson et al., 2003), but daily absorption averages are
usually not biased by such rapid fluctuations (Bernardoni et al., 2019).
Very high sample RH could lead to higher uncertainties, but absorption measurements at GAW stations are usually connected to inlets with some sort
of conditioning intended to reduce sample RH (e.g., diffusion or membrane dryers, dilution with dry air and, in some cases, heating). Additionally, CLAPs are gently heated to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to minimize RH effects. In
this study, stations with high sample RH in the nephelometer sample (Table 1) are also the most likely to have issues with high sample RH in the
collocated absorption photometer.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e5579">Size cut: as described in Table 1, the size cuts differ amongst the stations, but most of the sites measure TSP or PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The GAW program
generally recommends a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> size cut, except for stations in extreme
environments (clouds, etc.), where a whole air inlet is recommended (WMO/GAW report 227, 2016; GAW/WCCAP recommendations <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.wmo-gaw-wcc-aerosol-physics.org/files/WCCAP-recommendation-for-aerosol-inlets-and-sampling-tubes.pdf">https://www.wmo-gaw-wcc-aerosol-physics.org/files/WCCAP-recommendation-for-aerosol-inlets-and-sampling-tubes.pdf</ext-link>, last access: 20 July 2020).
Many stations in the NOAA Federated Aerosol Network measure at a second size
cut (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) as well. PAY and SUM are the only stations that have no
measurement of coarse-mode aerosol, with only a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inlet. As reported previously, the amount of aerosol particles larger than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m is usually sufficiently low to enable consideration of TSP and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> results as being in the same category. Moreover, the trend results of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sampling
are found to be quite similar for all stations with both size cuts, so that
the results of TSP/PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> size cut will be presented in this study and, if not
specified, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> results can be assumed to be similar to those of the larger
size cut (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or TSP).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e5686">Absorption filter photometer artifacts: the first main point to consider is that all filter-based absorption photometers suffer from various measurement artifacts and that continuous reference measurements to assess the absolute
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are not available at long-term monitoring sites. If
the variability and the long-term trends of absorption coefficients are to
be analyzed with high confidence, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absolute value is necessary to compute the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As stated in Sect. 2.2, the real <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values can potentially vary by a factor of 4 (1.5 to 5.5). Using
an erroneous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value can influence the magnitude of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. Similarly, an applied correction depending on the
wavelengths can affect the absorption Ångström exponent calculation
and its trends. Both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> long-term trends
therefore must be interpreted with greater care.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e5779">Nephelometer truncation correction artifacts: as explained in Sect. 2.2, the various types of nephelometers measure at different truncated angular ranges that were corrected by several algorithms or even not corrected. The absence
of truncation correction leads to lower scattering and backscattering
coefficients than the true values and the correction algorithm effects are
known to increase with particle size. The most important requirement that
was verified for this trend analysis is the coherent treatment of
nephelometer data for each time series. The bias leading to a higher
contribution of Aitken and accumulation modes than the coarse mode is
difficult to estimate, but the minimal differences in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> results
(see Sect. 4.2) suggest this artifact is small. The effect of the humidity on the nephelometer measurements is regarded as the most significant artifact.</p></list-item></list>
Finally, in order to minimize the potential artifacts in the determination of the long-term trends in the case of large seasonal variability (de Jong
and de Bruin, 2012), only full start and end years of the time series, that
is, without gaps in the data, were considered. For some stations, we did
allow gaps of up to 4–6 weeks without measurements after checking that the
removal of the whole year led to similar trend results.</p>
      <p id="d1e5802">The differences in instrumentation, measurement conditions, and
post-processing data treatment do not allow the absolute values for all
sites to be compared; however, because there was consistency of data
treatment for individual sites, the trends can be compared.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Trend analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e5814">The aerosol extensive parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>abs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are not normally distributed and they exhibit varying
degrees of autocorrelation. They can be represented approximately by a
lognormal distribution but are usually better fitted by a distribution in
the Johnson distribution family (Johnson, 1949). The intensive parameters
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) also exhibit
distributions that differ to varying degrees from the normal distribution.
We chose, therefore, to rely mostly on the non-parametric seasonal
Mann–Kendall (MK) test associated with Sen's slope. The MK test does not require normally<?pagebreak page8878?> distributed data. Additionally, as described under Sect. 2.5.1, the MK test was adapted to correctly handle autocorrelated datasets.
To allow a comparison with other studies, the trends were also computed with
the generalized least squares analysis associated with the autoregressive or block bootstrap confidence intervals (GLS) and the least-mean square (LMS) fit applied to the data logarithms.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1">
  <label>2.5.1</label><title>Mann–Kendall test and Sen's slope estimator</title>
      <p id="d1e5898">This non-parametric method based on rank (Gilbert, 1987; Sirois, 1998) is
the most appropriate test to compute optical property trends because it can be applied regardless of missing values, statistical distribution and
presence of negatives or below detection limit values in the dataset. The MK test determines whether a monotonic increasing or decreasing long-term trend exists; the slope and the confidence limits are then computed by Sen's slope estimator that is based on the median of the slopes calculated from
all possible data pairs. For this study, the MK test was applied on daily
medians.</p>
      <p id="d1e5901">The MK test is designed for serially independent data and is, consequently,
influenced by autocorrelation in the time series, leading to inflated type 1 error; that is, there is increased probability of rejecting the no-trend
hypothesis (i.e., a false positive). Several correction schemes for the MK
test were proposed to correctly handle autocorrelated datasets, and the problems induced by autocorrelation and its various corrections have been
clearly described (Wang and Swail, 2001; Yue et al., 2002; Zhang and Zwiers,
2004; Bayazit and Önöz, 2007; Blain, 2013; Wang et al., 2015). A new method (Collaud Coen et al., 2020) has
been used for this study that tends to minimize the type 1
and 2 errors (type 2 error is non-rejection of a false
null hypothesis, i.e., a false negative) as well as issues with the modification of the slope due to
pre-whitening procedures by the application of three pre-whitening (PW) methods. The standard
pre-whitening by removing the first lag autocorrelation (von Storch,
1995) has a very low type 1 error but also a low test power, whereas the
so-called trend-free pre-whitening procedure published by Yue et al. (2002)
(called TFPW-Y in Collaud Coen et al., 2020a) restores the test
power at the expense of the type 1 error. Both these pre-whitening procedures were applied prior to the MK test to assess the statistical significance of
the trend. A trend was then considered to be ss only if both PW and TFPW-Y were ss at the 95 % confidence level or if PW is ss but not TFPW-Y (false
negative). Among the trends of all parameters at all stations calculated for
this paper, none was ss for the PW but not for the TFPW-Y, meaning that the
PW procedure was always powerful enough. In contrast, many trends were not
ss when PW was applied, but were ss with the TFPW-Y procedure, leading to
false positives and showing that the TFPW-Y rejection rate of the no-trend
hypothesis is too high.</p>
      <p id="d1e5904">After having determined the statistical significance, a third pre-whitening procedure, the variance-corrected trend-free pre-whitening procedure (VCTFPW)
allowing an increase in the slope accuracy (Wang et al., 2015), was applied prior to Sen's slope estimation. The confidence limits of Sen's slope were computed at the 90 % confidence level.</p>
      <p id="d1e5907">Since many of the time series exhibited clear seasonal cycles, the modified
seasonal MK test (Hirsch et al., 1982) was always applied to the four
meteorological seasons. The annual trends were considered only if the slopes
of the four seasons were homogeneous at the 90 % confidence level
(Gilbert, 1987; Sirois, 1998).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e5913">Seasonal MK results for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend for three stations with long time series: JFJ, MRN and MLO. The trends are plotted for the last
10-year period (2009–2018) as well as for all possible longer periods (15 years <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2004–2018 to 30 years <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1989–2018). The seasons correspond to meteorological seasons (MAM: March–April–May, JJA: June–July–August,
SON: September–October–November and DJF: December–January–February). The dots correspond to the slope, large dots being ss at the 95 % confidence level, whereas small dots are not ss trends. The cyan triangles correspond to false
positive trends (with type 1 error). Red squares correspond to annual trends where the seasonal results are homogeneous.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5947">Figure 2 presents three examples of seasonal MK results and Sen's slopes of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At JFJ, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has ss negative annual trends for
all of the analyzed periods, with the most recent 10-year period with a larger negative slope than the longer periods. Spring and fall are the seasons at JFJ with the strongest ss trends; winter has tiny ss negative
trends. MRN also exhibits <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> annual negative trends for all of
the analyzed periods, but only the 15-, 20- and 25-year trends are ss, and their slopes are more negative for the longest periods. At MRN, summer and fall are the seasons with the largest trends, and that is true for all the trend periods (10–25 years), while spring and winter have more scattered and less significant slopes. Finally, MLO has annual trends
that are ss negative for the last 10 years, not ss for the last 15 years, and ss
positive for the longest periods (20, 25 and 30 years). The spring season at MLO exhibits a not ss negative trend for the last 10 years and positive trends for
the longest periods, with only 25- and 30-year trends being ss.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS2">
  <label>2.5.2</label><title>Least mean square analysis (LMS)</title>
      <p id="d1e5991">Following the Weatherhead procedure (Weatherhead et al., 2000), the trend is
estimated by fitting the following frequently used statistical model for
monthly data with an LMS approximation:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M292" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a constant term, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a seasonal component, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the magnitude of the trend per year. The unexplained noise term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
modeled as an [AR(1)] process <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the autocorrelation coefficient of the data noise. For this study, either the logarithm of the monthly medians or the monthly
medians were taken for all the parameters. Due to the non-normal
distribution of the studied parameters, the LMS method applied on the
logarithm is considered the standard method according to previous trend analyses (CC2013 and Asmi et al., 2013). A trend is considered to be ss at the 95 % confidence level if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the standard deviation of the
slope. Figure 3a and c show the LMS trends and statistics for MLO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The LMS results are similar to the MK analysis, the
last 10-year trend is negative but ss at only the 90 % confidence level, the 15- and 20-year trends are not ss and<?pagebreak page8879?> the 25- and 30-year trends are ss positive. The normal probability plot of the residue (Fig. 3c) shows that
the use of the logarithm of the data results in normally distributed
residues as required by this statistical tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS3">
  <label>2.5.3</label><title>Generalized least squares associated with the autoregressive bootstrapping method (GLS/ARB)</title>
      <p id="d1e6185">A similar GLS method based on the minimization of the least square errors similar to ordinary least squares fitting (including similar sensitivity to outliers), but taking into account the
autocorrelation in the covariance matrix, was also used in this study. The GLS uses an autoregressive bootstrapping algorithm (ARB) to evaluate the
potential differences in the GLS trends arising from the noise terms (Asmi
et al., 2013). The ARB methodology was used to produce 1000 realizations of
the original time series, with randomized noise terms, and the resulting set
of trends was used to determine the 5th to 95th percentile confidence
intervals (ARB CLs) of the GLS trends. If the ARB CLs did not include a zero
trend, we considered the GLS trend to be ss. The GLS and ARB methodologies
were adapted from Mudelsee (2010) and applied to both daily and monthly
medians. The previous trend analyses (CC2013 and Asmi et al., 2013) used
daily medians.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e6190">LMS and GLS/ARB results of MLO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <bold>(a)</bold> logarithm of the monthly medians (blue circles), LMS fit (red) and the 10- to 30-year slopes (ss slopes are plotted in black and not ss slopes in grey), <bold>(b)</bold> daily medians (light blue dots) and their GLS/ARB fit (orange line), monthly
medians (blue circles) and their GLS/ARB fit (red) and the 10- to 30-year slopes, <bold>(c)</bold> normplot of LMS residues, <bold>(d)</bold> monthly medians of the GLS/ARB
residues, <bold>(e)</bold> cumulative summation of monthly median GLS/ARB residues and <bold>(f)</bold>
normplot of GLS/ARB residues for daily medians (light blue crosses and
orange line) and monthly medians (blue crosses and red line).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e6229">Figure 3b and f show the GLS/ARB results for MLO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for daily and monthly medians. Here again the results are similar to the MK analysis,
where the 10-year trend is positive but not ss, the 15-year trend is not ss, while the longer periods exhibit ss positive trends. As with many other stations included in this study, the use of daily or monthly medians did not result
in normally distributed residues (Fig. 3f), and, in fact, the residues of the daily and monthly medians appeared to represent different types of
distributions. It is also obvious that the seasonality fits (fits from
monthly and daily medians in red and orange in Fig. 3b) are different for the two time granularities, with similar shape but higher absolute trend
values if fitted from daily medians. The timing of the winter minima is also
more precisely defined with the daily data.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Long-term trends ending in the present day (2016–2018)</title>
      <p id="d1e6260">To assess the aerosol optical property long-term trends, the largest number of stations around the world was included in this study. This overview takes into account the 10-year (or longer) trends ending in 2016, 2017 or 2018. The results shown here comprise not only the 10-year trends, but also
the longer periods for 15 to 40 years in 5-year increments also ending in
2016–2018. The results are presented for the MK analysis and a comparison
between the trend analysis<?pagebreak page8880?> methods will follow in Sect. 3.3. Complete
results for all the other methods can be found in the Supplement.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Total scattering and hemispheric backscattering coefficients</title>
      <p id="d1e6270">Long-term trend analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been performed on 37 datasets. Since some nephelometers only measure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Optec and
Radiance Research nephelometers) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined to be
unusable for several other sites due to various discontinuities (see Sect. 2.4), the hemispheric backscattering coefficient trends were computed on
only 28 datasets. The detailed results of MK trend analyses are given in Table 2, while the overall picture for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is presented in Fig. 4. The results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are very similar to those for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for sites where both measurements existed; corresponding figures for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be found in the Supplement (Figs. S1, S2
and S7).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e6354">MK trends for all parameters in units per year for the last 10, 15 and
20 years of measurements ending in 2016–2018. The ss trends are given in bold.
Results in % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are given in Table S1.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.62}[.62]?><oasis:tgroup cols="21">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="17" colname="col17" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="18" colname="col18" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="19" colname="col19" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="20" colname="col20" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="21" colname="col21" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col11" nameend="col13" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col14" nameend="col16" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col17" nameend="col19" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col20" nameend="col21" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">(years) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">(years) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center" colsep="1">(years) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col11" nameend="col13" align="center" colsep="1">(years) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col14" nameend="col16" align="center" colsep="1">(years) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col17" nameend="col19" align="center" colsep="1">(years) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col20" nameend="col21" align="center">(years) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col21">Africa </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IZO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.106</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col21">Asia </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AMY</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.741</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.068</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><bold>0.012</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LLN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.109</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.049</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.003</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><bold>0.018</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"><bold>0.004</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.428</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.057</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.002</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"><bold>0.024</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col21">Europe </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BEO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.052</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.023</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.019</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BIR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.144</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.020</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.020</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.013</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CMN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.011</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FKL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HPB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.414</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.047</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.069</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SMR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.193</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.022</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.038</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.002</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><bold>0.011</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.003</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IPR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>2.454</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.317</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.124</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.006</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.007</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">JFJ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.092</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.062</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.031</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.007</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.006</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.004</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.011</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.004</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.002</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.029</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.008</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"><bold>0.004</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.007</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.006</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KPS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.285</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.023</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MPZ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>1.015</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.145</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.121</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MSY</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>1.155</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.095</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.027</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.003</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.002</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PAL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.064</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.012</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.002</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PAY</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.235</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PUY</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.147</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.017</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.002</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.002</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.021</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UGR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.330</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.062</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.031</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><bold>0.008</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ZSF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.036</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col21">North America </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ACA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.522</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.301</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.267</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">APP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.627</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.074</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.092</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.008</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BND</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.787</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.526</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.413</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.107</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.071</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.056</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.055</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.065</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.025</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><bold>0.006</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"><bold>0.003</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CPR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.394</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.037</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.010</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.018</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"><bold>0.088</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EGB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.093</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.041</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.008 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.003</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.027</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.022</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GBN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.168</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GLR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.147</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HGC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.152</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.158</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.061</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MCN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>1.321</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>1.161</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.821</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MRN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.026</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.104</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.208</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RMN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.011</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SGP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.294</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.299</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.318</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.036</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.047</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.036</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.008</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.007</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.006</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"><bold>0.017</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SHN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.712</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.673</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.539</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">THD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.636</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.071</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><bold>0.013</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col21">South Pacific </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CGO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.124</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MLO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.015</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.003</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.003</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.002</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.002</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.004</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.019</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.010</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"><bold>0.081</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col21">Polar regions </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.005</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.002</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><bold>0.012</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"><bold>0.008</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BRW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.241</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.068</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.054</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.016</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.007</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.002</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><bold>0.010</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.002</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NMY</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SPO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.006</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.004</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.003</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.006</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.023</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.028</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SUM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TIK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.006</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ZEP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.050</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.007</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.018</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.003</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.018</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"><bold>0.003</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e10160">MK trend results for the scattering coefficient. Black symbols correspond to stations with no significant trends. Green and orange symbols
correspond to ss negative and positive trends, respectively. The magnitude
of the trends (slope) is given by the colors as stipulated in the legend.
The size of the circles is proportional to the length of the datasets, with the central dots representing the most recent 10-year trend ending in 2016, 2017 or 2018. If possible, trends for longer time periods were calculated
and the larger circles denote the trends for 15 to 40 years in 5-year increments.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e10170">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ss trends are predominantly negative: 20 stations have
ss negative 10-year trends, 5 stations ss positive trends and 12 stations no ss trends dispersed across all continents. Eight (nine) stations with time series longer than 10 years have ss negative 15-year (20-year) trends and none (two) of the 15-year (20-year) trends are ss positive. The MK slopes range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.39 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The main results are as follows.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10262">Over North America, all the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends for periods longer than
10 years are ss negative, and the most recent 10-year trends are generally ss negative. Three stations do not have ss trends. (1) EGB's 9-year time series does not allow for a ss trend (too short), but was included as one of only two
Canadian sites. (2) MRN is an IMPROVE station on the western coast of the USA with very high humidity, leading to condensation that can disturb the humidity measurement. This makes it difficult to know whether the ss positive RH
10-year trend (Table S4) is real or due to measurement artifacts and uncertainties. If the ss positive RH trend is real, it could mask a decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend, resulting in a not ss trend. The time
coverage for the dry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> restricted to
RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %) for MRN is too low to be representative for trend
analysis. It should be mentioned that the 10-year trends for MRN ending in 2014–2018 are all not ss (see Sect. 3.2.1), so that the absence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends seems to be a real phenomenon. (3) GLR is also an IMPROVE station with high humidity. The RH trends at GLR are also not ss, and the dry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a ss negative trend, similar to other stations in
its vicinity.</p>
      <p id="d1e10339">In the previous decadal trend paper (CC2013), the trends in scattering for
the arid state of Arizona were<?pagebreak page8881?> not consistent (ss positive: IBB, ss
negative: SIA, PAZ, not ss: HGC, SCN). Four of the five Arizona sites (IBB,
PAZ, SIA and SCB) were closed in 2010 and HGC now exhibits a ss decreasing
scattering trend. MZW, the other IMPROVE station with ss positive scattering
trends in 2010, also closed in 2010.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10343">Most (7 out of 11) of the European sites have present-day ss decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. The other four stations do not have ss
trends: (1) one urban station also influenced by Saharan dust (UGR), (2) two
sites in eastern European countries (KPS and BEO) and (3) a high-altitude station in the Central Range in France (PUY). The ss negative scattering trends of the Scandinavian stations have lower absolute slopes than in
central Europe. PAL, the northernmost station, has a ss positive trend. PAL
is geographically situated in Europe, but it can be climatologically considered an Arctic station (Schmeisser et al., 2018). PAL (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) has a similar trend to ZEP (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), the nearest Arctic station, with the largest ss trend in summer (JJA) when PAL is
largely influenced by Arctic air masses. The increasing trend at PAL may be
due to increasing biogenic secondary organic aerosol formation related to
emissions from the surrounding boreal forest (Lihavainen et al., 2015a),
changes in circulation patterns or a larger influence of open water with
increasing concentration of sea salt aerosol.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10421">Sites in the polar regions exhibit two ss positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. In addition to ZEP and PAL, SPO also has a ss positive present-day 10-year trend but with lower slope,<?pagebreak page8882?> whereas no ss trend is found for the other Antarctic site (NMY). BRW and ALT both exhibit ss negative 10-year trends. The BRW 15-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend is not ss, whereas longer periods up to 40 years lead to ss negative trends. SPO also has very long time series but with alternating
trend slopes, from ss positive for the shortest periods (10–25 years) to ss
negative for the longest periods (35–40 years), with some not ss trends in
between. The aerosol load is very low at BRW and SPO, leading to scattering coefficients near the instrumental detection limits, so that the measurement
uncertainties are proportionally larger than for middle-latitude stations.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10447">CPR, a site on the Caribbean island of Puerto Rico, has a ss positive
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend. At CPR, the largest scattering trend is found in
summer and the scattering trend of the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trend is 5 times larger than the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trend. The most probable explanation is increased Saharan dust transport over the Atlantic Ocean; more dust transport has been reported at an IMPROVE
site in the Caribbean (Hand et al., 2017, 2019).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10480">The only two stations representing the Pacific region are MLO and CGO. The
recent MLO 10-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend is ss decreasing, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 15-year trend is not ss, whereas the trends for the longer time
periods (20–30 years) are ss positive (see Fig. 2). In the previous decadal
trend paper (CC2013), MLO exhibited a ss positive trend for the 10-year period ending in 2010. MLO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends changed from previously ss
positive to currently ss negative trends. The recent 10-year trend at CGO is found to be positive and quite homogeneous with the seasons, with fall being
the only season without a ss trend.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10517">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are mostly (70 %) not ss for stations at
middle to high altitudes. From the 10 stations higher than 1100 m a.s.l.,
only SPO in Antarctica has a present-day ss positive 10-year trend and only JFJ in the European Alps, HGC in Arizona and GBN in Nevada exhibit ss negative 10-year trends. In contrast, only 26 % of the stations lower than 1100 m a.s.l. do not have ss trends. New particle formation (NPF) and growth
are favored at high altitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 and up to 5000 m) due to
low temperatures, high solar radiation and low pre-existing particle
concentrations, leading to limited condensational sinks for nucleation precursor gases (Sellegri et al., 2019). This higher frequency of nucleation
at high altitude leads to a high contribution of secondary particles to the
total number concentration that largely contributes to the total scattering
coefficient. The decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends from anthropogenic
pollution in the planetary boundary layer can, consequently, be masked by
the presence of NFP at high-altitude stations.</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e10551">Seasonal results of the MK trend of the scattering coefficient.
Other details same as Fig. 4.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e10562">MK trend results for the absorption coefficient. Other details same as Fig. 4.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e10571">The seasonal MK results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are presented in Fig. 5. Spring
is the season with the largest number of ss decreasing<?pagebreak page8883?> trends and winter the season with the lowest. ZEP and PAL exhibit ss positive trends only in summer and
BRW has ss negative trends only between December and May. The SPO annual
trend is ss positive, whereas it is not for NMY. Both Antarctic stations exhibit, however, a coherent seasonality with ss positive trends only in
spring. While the 25- and 30-year trends at MLO are all ss positive, with the largest slope in spring when MLO is influenced by Asian long-range transport
(CC2013), the most recent 10–20-year trends are not ss for the individual seasons.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page8884?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Absorption coefficient</title>
      <p id="d1e10593">The analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> long-term trends has been performed on 33
datasets (see Fig. 6 and Tables 2 and 3). The long-term trends are ss
decreasing (21 stations) or not ss (12 stations) for all stations around the
world, leading to a mean decreasing trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. No ss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> positive trends are measured for any of the stations. The
other main results are the following.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10655">In North America the number of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> datasets is much lower than
the number of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> datasets (IMPROVE sites do measure aerosol
absorption, but with a different instrumental setup; White et al., 2016).
From the five sites with long-term aerosol absorption, APP and BND, two
continental rural sites, and the marine Caribbean island (CPR) station have
ss negative trends. The other three stations representing the continental rural USA (SGP, EGB) and marine western coast of the USA (THD) exhibit not ss trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10692">In Europe, most (12 stations) of the 10-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are ss negative. Only three stations, one Scandinavian (PAL), one eastern rural continental (KPS) and one coastal Mediterranean (FKL) station exhibit no ss
trends. The 15-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends at JFJ and FKL are ss negative.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10718">In Asia, both the high-altitude stations of LLN in Taiwan and WLG in China exhibit annual ss decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. The South Korean
coastal station of AMY has no ss annual trend.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10733">For the polar regions, the Antarctica site of NMY, the American Arctic site of BRW and the Russian Arctic site of TIK have slight ss negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends, whereas SUM, ALT and ZEP have no ss trends. Thus, there is
no common clear <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend in the polar regions.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10759">In the southwestern Pacific, the high-altitude station of MLO has a ss decreasing trend for the last 10 years but no ss trend for the last 15 years,
whereas the coastal station of CGO in Australia exhibits not ss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e10774">In contrast to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends at
high-altitude stations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1100 m a.s.l) are mostly (6 out of 8) ss decreasing; the trends at the other two high-altitude stations are not ss.</p></list-item></list>
The seasonal trends are more strongly negative and more ss in spring than in
summer (see Fig. S3). Winter is the season with the smallest number of ss
decreasing trends in Europe (only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and with the only ss positive trend
(ZSF), the others being not ss, whereas fall seems to be the season with the
lowest ss trend in North America.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e10821">MK trend results for the single scattering albedo. Other details
same as Fig. 4.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e10832">Seasonal results of the MK trend of the single scattering albedo.
Other details same as Fig. 4.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Single scattering albedo</title>
      <p id="d1e10849">As described under Sect. 2.4, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends have to be considered
with greater caution since the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absolute values suffer from
a certain uncertainty related to filter-based absorption photometer
artifacts.</p>
      <p id="d1e10874">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends depend directly on both the magnitude and the
sign of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. If expressed in
% yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend larger (smaller) than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
trend will result in an increasing (decreasing) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend,
respectively (see Fig. S8 and the related estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty due to measurement and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> errors). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
trends are consequently much more diverse than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends with 52 % of ss positive (relatively more
scattering), 22 % of ss negative (relatively more absorption) and 26 %
not ss trends (see Fig. 7 and Table 2). One peculiarity is that all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ss negative trends are found between latitudes 30 and 50, but this is perhaps due to the low spatial coverage outside of North America and Europe. The main results are the following.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e11025">MK trend results for the backscattering fraction. Other details same as Fig. 4.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e11035"><list list-type="bullet">
              <list-item>

      <p id="d1e11040">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is decreasing at three stations in North America (BND,
SGP and THD), whereas APP and CPR exhibit ss positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
trends. The CPR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increasing trend can perhaps be related to
increased Saharan dust load. The seasonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends at CPR are,
however, ss not only in summer when Saharan influence is greatest, but for every season except spring (Fig. 8). EGB has no ss trend.</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <p id="d1e11090">European stations exhibit ss increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends at the urban
station of UGR and at most eastern and Scandinavian stations (KPS, SMR, PAL)
and at the mid-altitude station of HPB. These ss positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
trends in eastern and northern Europe are strongest in summer (Fig. 8), when MEL and BIR are also ss positive, and weakest in winter when only
PAL is ss positive (possibly related to increased particle formation from
biogenic emissions, as mentioned above). In central Europe, JFJ, IPR and MSY
have ss negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends for the entire year as well as for
all seasons. PUY, a station at 1465 m in France's Central Range, has a ss positive annual trend due to strong positive trends in fall and winter, even if a strong ss negative trend is found in summer. Because the site is
located at a mid-range elevation (1465 m a.s.l.), PUY has a large probability
of being influenced by different air masses as a function of the season,
with a large impact of the planetary boundary layer in summer (Collaud Coen
et al., 2018; Hervo, 2013).</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <p id="d1e11129">The high-altitude stations of LLN and WLG in Asia have strong and weak ss positive annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends, respectively. This pattern is
also observed for all seasonal trends at LLN, but only in fall at WLG. The coastal station of AMY has a ss decreasing annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend that is due to decreasing trends in MAM, SON and DJF. AMY is located in an
agricultural and touristic region that is influenced not only by these
regional aerosol sources<?pagebreak page8885?> (e.g., traffic, field burning), but also by long-range transported plumes with high aerosol load.</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <p id="d1e11157">The Arctic stations of ALT and ZEP have ss positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> annual
trends, which are due to ss positive trends from December to August for ALT
and from December to May for ZEP. The two polar stations (BRW and NMY)
exhibit no ss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> annual trends, although there is a ss positive
trend in summer at BRW for the most recent 10-year time series.</p>
              </list-item>
            </list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e11186">MK trend results for the scattering Ångström exponent.
Other details same as Fig. 4.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e11197">MK trend results for the absorption Ångström exponent. Other details same as Fig. 4.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>3.1.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Backscattering fraction and scattering {\AA}ngstr\"{o}m exponent}?><title>Backscattering fraction and scattering Ångström exponent</title>
      <p id="d1e11216">The present-day trends for the backscatter fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are mostly ss positive
(65 %) across all regions (Fig. 9 and<?pagebreak page8886?> Table 2). This suggests a shift in the size
distribution towards smaller accumulation-mode aerosol. The two stations with ss negative trends are CPR in Puerto Rico and BEO, located on a summit
in the Balkan range. Not ss trends are mostly found in eastern and northern
Europe (KPS, MEL, BIR and PAL), in Antarctica (NMY), as well as at BND and
AMY for the last 10 years. The Arctic sites (ALT, BRW and ZEP) all exhibit ss
positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. CPR's seasonal trend is ss negative only in fall; trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the other seasons at CPR are not ss (see Fig. S4). Similarly, the
BEO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonal trend is ss negative only in summer, and not ss otherwise.
PAL has ss positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends in spring and summer and ss negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends for fall, leading to an annual not ss trend.</p>
      <p id="d1e11262">The scattering Ångström exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) trends exhibit a
higher variability than the trends in other parameters, with 33 % of ss positive trends, 37 % of ss negative trends and<?pagebreak page8887?> 30 % of not ss trends (Fig. 10 and Table 2). There
are ss positive and negative trends in North America, Europe and the polar regions, and the various trends cannot be attributed to specific regions or environments. It should be recalled, however, that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is affected
by higher uncertainties (see Sect. 2.3) that may contribute to the larger
observed variability. The seasonal results also exhibit high variability,
with summer being the season with the least number of ss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends
(10 out of 26 sites), while spring and fall are the seasons with the largest
number of ss positive and negative trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (8 out of 26
sites), respectively (see Fig. S5).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS5">
  <label>3.1.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Absorption {\AA}ngstr\"{o}m exponent}?><title>Absorption Ångström exponent</title>
      <p id="d1e11318">The number of stations with long-term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement is low, with
only 14 time series available. Seven stations situated in various geographical regimes exhibit ss positive
trends (Fig. 11 and Table 2): polar regions (ALT and ZEP), a Caribbean coastal station (CPR), a rural continental North America station (SGP), and high-altitude stations
in the remote Pacific (MLO), in continental (WLG) and in coastal (LLN) Asia. SMR and JFJ, two stations in Europe
but with very different environmental footprints and altitudes, exhibit ss
decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends; the six other stations, consisting of three coastal and two continental sites, have no ss trends.</p>
      <p id="d1e11343">While CPR and SGP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are ss positive and JFJ ss negative
for all four seasons, the other stations exhibit higher variability as a
function of the meteorological seasons (see Fig. S6). The absorption
Ångström exponent is principally a function of the particle chemical
composition and material properties, but its assignment to an aerosol type is not uniquely defined and also depends on the particle size, with larger
particles corresponding to lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Liu et al., 2016;
Schmeisser et al., 2017). For example, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
corresponds to mineral dust in the case of big particles and to brown carbon in the case of small particles. In contrast, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
corresponds to large particles with small absorption like sea-salt-dominated aerosol in the case of big particles and to black carbon (BC)-dominated aerosol in the case of small particles. Following these observational constraints, the JFJ
and SMR aerosol tends to represent the category “mixed BC/BrC” according to Schmeisser et al. (2018). CPR absorption has a strong contribution from
mineral dust and sea salt, whereas at MLO, SGP, ALT and ZEP contributions to
absorption are from mixed sources, including various light-absorbing carbon species and dust. Ideally, direct chemical composition measurements would
provide more precise information on the aerosol type, but the necessary
chemical composition measurements are not yet readily available at many
sites.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e11400">Time series of sequential 10-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  trends as a function of station longitude. Stations in the South Pacific and in the polar regions were grouped for clarity. The red arrow indicates the end of the
time periods covered in CC2013.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Time evolution of 10-year trends</title>
      <p id="d1e11429">The previous section describes the present-day trends for different periods extending from 10 to 40 years. Another interesting analysis is to follow the
evolution of the trends in time and space. For this purpose, all the
possible 10-year trends were computed and plotted as a timeline for each station. In what follows each point on the timeline represents a 10-year trend
ending in the year it is located on the graph. For example, in Fig. 12 the
two black points for AMY represent the 10-year trends covering the periods 2008–2017 and 2009–2018,<?pagebreak page8888?> respectively. These timelines can be presented as a
function of the latitude, longitude, altitude or environment. Depending on
the results, the most interesting representation has been chosen for each
parameter.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Scattering and backscattering coefficients</title>
      <p id="d1e11439">Figure 12 presents the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trend timelines as a function of the longitude of the stations. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trend timelines
are similar to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend timelines (see Fig. S7). The polar
stations (in both the Arctic and Antarctic) have been gathered to the bottom
of the figure just after the two Pacific stations of MLO and CGO. The main
result is that the sites in eastern and central North America (longitude
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">112</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) have ss negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends ending after 2009–2012 regardless of their altitude (200–2200 m a.s.l.) and their environments. This is a clear signature of
continental-scale modification due to air quality regulations, and this very clear feature relates to the sulfate-dominated aerosol in the eastern USA and to large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reductions in power plant emissions (Hand et al., 2014;
McClure and Jaffe, 2018). Almost all the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends in the southwestern USA (MZW, SCN and HGC) ending before 2011 are ss positive, as published in the previous trend analysis (CC2013). MLO also exhibits ss
positive trends for the same period. These four stations are also high-altitude sites (2000–3400 m), so that it is possible that all of them were
influenced by long-range transport of highly polluted air masses from Asia
(CC2013). It is further interesting to note that the high-altitude site JFJ (3580 m) in Europe also exhibited a ss positive 10-year trend ending in 2005–2008.</p>
      <p id="d1e11537">The evolution of the European <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends does not show a clear time for trend modification as is seen in North America, probably due
to variable timing in implementation of abatement policies in each
individual country. Apart from PAL (which can be considered, to some extent, to be a polar station), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends in Europe ending after 2008 are all ss negative or not ss. The four stations in Asia do not have ss trends ending in the last 5 years. The two African stations exhibit no ss trend.
For polar sites, BRW, ALT and NMY have mostly not ss trends, whereas SPO
exhibits alternating ss positive and negative trends, with the oldest 10-year<?pagebreak page8889?> trends being not ss. In contrast, ZEP exhibits positive trends for all three
10-year periods, which is similar to the 10-year trends at PAL for the same time periods. Due to the very low aerosol concentrations at these sites and,
thus, larger measurement uncertainty, it is difficult to interpret the
evolving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> polar trends. They could be related to increased
influence from the boreal forest and/or changed circulation patterns
modifying the sea/ice influence.</p>
      <p id="d1e11573">The GSN dataset only covers 8 years, with some missing periods due to the destruction of the station by a typhoon. Due to the very low number of
long-term measurements in Asia, GSN was included in this study. While GSN
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> summer trends are not reliable (low data coverage and
issues in humidity control), the ss negative winter–spring trends corresponding to the dry season are valid and in line with the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreasing trends in Korea (Kim and Lee, 2018; Nam et al., 2018).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e11599">Time series of sequential 10-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends as a function of station longitude. The red arrow indicates the end of the time
period covered in CC2013.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f13.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Absorption coefficient</title>
      <p id="d1e11627">The lengths of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series are much shorter than for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 13). This means that the oldest 10-year trends cover the period 1998–2007 (BRW and BND), followed by MLO (2001–2010) and JFJ
(2002–2011). For these four stations, the most recent 10-year trends are either not ss or ss negative. The present-day (i.e., trends covering 2009–2018) ss
negative 10-year trends (JFJ, BND, MLO and BRW) are preceded by not ss trends. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trend evolution of each station is usually homogeneous with either ss negative or not ss 10-year trends in Asia, Europe, Africa and North America. ALT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 years ending in 2017 is ss
positive. The BRW polar station and MLO high-altitude station exhibit also some ss positive 10-year trends ending between 2010 and 2014. Unfortunately,
only MLO has a long enough <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series to compare with the
ss positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends at high-altitude sites (Fig. 12). At MLO, the series of ss positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends ended in
2008, while the series of ss positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends occurred for the period ending 2009–2013.</p>
      <p id="d1e11719">Figures 12 and 13 suggest that mid-latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sequential 10-year trends were ss positive for some periods between 2000 and 2013, followed by not ss trends and ending in the present day with
ss negative trends. The evolution from increasing to decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends appears to be not simultaneous, with
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inflection points occurring some years before those for
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. The sparse number of stations with long enough
time series does not allow generalization of this result.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e11791">Time series of sequential 10-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends as a function of station longitude.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f14.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e11814">Time series of sequential 10-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends as a function of station longitude. The red arrows indicate the end of the time
period covered in CC2013.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f15.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Single scattering albedo</title>
      <p id="d1e11849">Because it is limited by the length of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trend evolution also only covers the last decade. The following results can be seen in Fig. 14.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e11876">All stations at longitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> have ss positive
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends except for AMY, which exhibits a ss negative 10-year trend ending in 2018, and MUK with a not ss 10-year trend ending in 2013. For European sites, ss positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends exist for all
stations at latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 46.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, apart from BIR, which has a not ss trend ending in 2018. This suggests that the decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends in Asia and in eastern and northern Europe are
proportionally larger than the decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <?pagebreak page8890?><p id="d1e11957">The central and western European sites exhibit mostly ss negative or not ss
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends. At JFJ and IPR, a shift from not ss to ss negative 10-year trends occurred in 2013–2014. The JFJ time series is moreover
long enough to monitor a ss positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trend ending in previous years (2010). The urban station of UGR in Spain exhibits an increasing trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (decrease in contribution of absorbing
aerosol) for the most recent 10-year period (2009–2018), possibly related to long-term effects of the 2008 financial crisis (e.g., Lyamani et al., 2011).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e11994">In North America, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends ending after 2013 are ss negative or not ss, apart from CPR in Puerto Rico and APP. The sites with
the longest series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends (BND and THD) exhibit ss positive trends followed by not ss and ss negative trends. In contrast, MLO
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends shifted from ss negative trends (10-year trends ending in 2010–2015) to not ss trends (10-year trends ending 2017) to a ss positive trend in 2018. This is consistent with the observed increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends ending in 2010–2012.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e12042">The two polar sites of BRW and NMY exhibit mostly not ss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends, whereas ALT and ZEP, similar to northern European sites, exhibit ss positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all the 10-year trends.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>3.2.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Backscattering fraction and scattering {\AA}ngstr\"{o}m exponent}?><title>Backscattering fraction and scattering Ångström exponent</title>
      <p id="d1e12077">Both the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends in Asia and Africa exhibit similar 10-year trend patterns that are either ss positive or not ss (Fig. 15). In this context, similar means that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are never ss when opposite signs of the slope are observed. These results suggest that
particle average size tends to decrease at the Asian and African sites. In
Europe, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends have a majority of ss negative or not ss trends in the northeast (longitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). At lower European longitudes, there is a discrepancy between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends, with IPR, JFJ and PUY having opposite ss trends for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends being often ss positive and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends often
ss negative. The discrepancy in the signs of the trends for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be related to shifts in both the fine and coarse modes of
the aerosol size distribution – this is discussed more below (see Sect. 4.2).</p>
      <p id="d1e12224">In North America, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends ending after 2012 are almost all ss positive, whereas the previous 10-year trends<?pagebreak page8891?> are ss negative at BND and MLO. As
in western America, one can see discrepancies in the sign of the slope for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends, with APP, CPR, MLO, SGP and THD having at least one 10-year period with opposite signed ss trends. Also, as in western
Europe, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are usually ss positive and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends ss
negative. BND records four 10-year periods with opposite ss trends. In contrast to the other stations, BND <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are ss positive, while BND <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits ss negative trends.</p>
      <p id="d1e12289">In the polar regions, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year ss trends ending after 2014 are all ss positive, whereas the older trends are primarily ss negative. Here again, the discrepancy between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends is large, with all the 10-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends for ZEP and ALT being ss with opposite
signs. In contrast, BRW exhibits trends with the same sign for both
parameters that can be interpreted as an increase in average particle size for early years followed by a decrease after 2014.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16"><?xmltex \currentcnt{16}?><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p id="d1e12338">Time series of sequential 10-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends as a function of station latitude.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f16.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e12361">Number of trends analyzed for each parameter, of ss cases for each trend analysis method, of trends with similar statistical significance in
MK, GLS/day and LMS/log, of trends with similar statistical significance for
all five methods, of trends with at least GLS/day or LMS/log ss similar to MK, and of trends with no agreement between these two methods and MK ss.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Time series</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ss MK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ss GLS/day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ss GLS/month</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ss LMS/log</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ss LMS/lin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MK, GLS/day and LMS/log identical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">all 5 methods identical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GLS/day or LMS/log identical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MK different from GLS/day or LMS/log</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS5">
  <label>3.2.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Absorption {\AA}ngstr\"{o}m exponent}?><title>Absorption Ångström exponent</title>
      <p id="d1e12776">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series are not very long, because the first generation
of absorption photometers used either white light or only one wavelength
(Fig. 16). The longest time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> begins in 2002 at JFJ and
exhibits a continuous ss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease. Similar to the results for
JFJ, most of the stations have consistently ss negative (JFJ, SMR), ss
positive (ALT, ZEP, IPR, SGP, WLG, LLN, MLO and CPR) or not ss 10-year trends (TIK, BRW, THD, APP, GSN, MUK and CPT). The not ss trends of TIK and GSN may
be due to datasets shorter than 10 years.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Comparison of the trends among methods</title>
      <p id="d1e12821">As described under Sect. 2.5, the long-term trends were computed with three methods (MK, GLS and LMS), where GLS was used on both daily and monthly
medians and LMS with and without taking the logarithm of the monthly
medians. These methods are thereafter called GLS/day, GLS/month, LMS/log and
LMS/lin, respectively. Tables S2 and S3 give the GLS/day and LMS/log results
for all parameters and stations. Table 3 presents an overview of the number
of present-day 10-year trends that are ss with each method. For the reasons described in Sect. 2.5.1, MK is considered to be the most appropriate method
for aerosol optical parameters. The agreement between the three methods used
in CC2013 (MK, GLS/day and LMS/log) and between all five methods are then also reported in Table 3, as well as the number of cases with either GLS/day or
LMS/log agreement with MK and with both GLS/day and LMS/log disagreement
with MK. The following conclusions can be derived.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e12826">Generally, the trends computed by the various methods agree very well with one another. Among all parameters, all stations and all periods, none of the
present-day trends presents ss results with opposite slope for different
methods. In all cases, the differences among methods relate either to the degree of the ss or to the sign of the slopes for not ss trends. This
implies that the main conclusions of this study would not have been
fundamentally different if the other methods were used.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e12830">GLS applied on daily medians is the method that has the largest number of ss
trends for all parameters.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e12834">The three methods applied on monthly data have a lower number of ss trends for all the computed parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e12878">The three methods used in 2013 have similar statistical significance
(comprising cases with no ss trend) in 44 % to 86 % of the cases,
whereas the five methods used here exhibit consistency in 37 % to 82 % of the cases. The measured parameters, which are less uncertain than the
calculated parameters, always exhibit the largest agreements amongst the methods (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 69 % for the three methods used in 2013 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63 % for the five methods utilized here). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is always the
parameter with the largest dissimilarity among the methods and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the parameter with the largest similarity among methods.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e12918">The MK statistical significance is similar to at least one of the methods
applied in 2013 in more than 90 % of the cases for all of the parameters
apart from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (88 %) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (78 %). This lower
level of agreement can be explained by the fact that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are almost normally distributed, so that the use of the LMS/log is not appropriate.</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F17"><?xmltex \currentcnt{17}?><label>Figure 17</label><caption><p id="d1e12967">Median, interquartile ranges and whiskers of the slopes in % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
computed by the five methods for the scattering coefficient, the absorption
coefficient, the single scattering albedo, the backscattering fraction and
the scattering Angström exponent. The outliers are not always visible in
the figure for the purpose of clarity.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f17.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e12988">The boxplots of the slopes computed by the various methods (Fig. 17) show
first that the application of the logarithm to transform to a normal
distribution for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (not shown) is not
suitable and leads to very large interquartile ranges. While the measured
parameters are clearly not normally distributed, the derived parameters
usually have distributions that more closely approximate normal
distributions.<?pagebreak page8892?> No systematic rule could be deduced, since the distributions
of each computed parameter largely depend on the individual stations. It seems however that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the Ångström exponents are
closer to the normal distribution than to the lognormal distribution.</p>
      <p id="d1e13025">The Sen slope estimator applied to the variance-corrected pre-whitening (Wang et al., 2015) leads, in almost all cases, to a median of the slope nearer to zero than the other methods. The VCTFPW method was developed specifically to
get rid of the falsely increased slope by the trend-free pre-whitening process (Collaud Coen et al., 2020a). The LMS/log method sometimes results in lower absolute slope medians, and this effect is probably due to the almost normal distribution of the data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> log of the monthly median).
Both the GLS (GLS/day and GLS/month) and LMS/lin methods lead to higher absolute slopes, probably due to misuse of statistical methods developed for
normally distributed data.</p>
      <p id="d1e13035">The GLS/day method leads to a broader range of slopes than the GLS/month method. This larger variance may be due to (1) the larger variability of
daily data, leading to a less distinct seasonal cycle and, consequently, to a worse fit of the seasonal variation and (2) a higher autocorrelation in the
daily time series with, possibly, an autocorrelation order larger than one.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Considerations related to measurement humidity</title>
      <p id="d1e13054">As explained in the instrumental section, GAW protocol suggests that the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> be measured at low and controlled
humidity, and that is the case for almost all stations considered here,
except for those in the IMPROVE network which measure at ambient conditions
due to their different monitoring goals. Temporal cycles and variations of
RH with time are observed in a number of datasets. There are also some clear
breakpoints in measurement RH that have been identified at several stations
(e.g., an insulating jacket was installed on the nephelometer at THD in late
2012, resulting in a clear decrease in sample RH due to warmer nephelometer temperatures). It is evident that high RH will enhance particle diameters
and, consequently, increase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> while resulting in decreased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This particle
diameter enhancement depends not only on the RH values, but also on the particle hygroscopicity, which is a function of the aerosol size
distribution and chemical composition.</p>
      <p id="d1e13131">Similarly to the previous aerosol optical property trend study (CC2013), dry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated by removing data when measurement RH was
higher than 50 % in order to<?pagebreak page8893?> minimize the impact of aerosol hygroscopicity
on the scattering trends. However, hygroscopic growth can occur for RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %; for example, for sea salt aerosol, up to 25 % of the
scattering could be due to water at RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 % (e.g., Fig. 5 in Zieger et
al., 2013). The confounding effects of aerosol water impact the reported
scattering values and, hence, the trends presented here to a greater or
lesser extent. The effect of hygroscopic growth at RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % on the
reported trends would depend on the temporal variability in sample RH,
composition and size; investigating the interactions amongst those
parameters is beyond the scope of this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e13166">For this study, if RH was frequently larger than 50 % at a station,
relationships between RH and aerosol parameter trends were analyzed as follows. In the case of the RH trend being not ss, the aerosol parameter trends were considered to be independent of the RH variation. In the case
where a ss RH trend was detected (see Table S4 in the Supplement), an attempt was made to try to determine the influence of RH trend on each aerosol
parameter by considering the following situations: (1) if all aerosol trends
follow the RH trends, (2) if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at all measurement RH and dry
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are similar, and, finally, (3) the features of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends, which are less likely to be influenced by
long-term RH variation. The distinct patterns exhibited by the evolution of
the 10-year trends were very helpful in this analysis. Below we describe the assumed implications for scattering trends at sites where trends in RH were observed for several cases.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e13204">Trends in RH are the opposite of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
trends: this implies that the aerosol optical property trends are real and not influenced by humidity (SMR, SHN, MRN).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e13230">Trends in RH are ss, but trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are not ss: this implies that the absence of statistical significance for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends
is real if the slopes of the RH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends have the same sign (IZO, LLN) or can be partially induced by the RH trend if the slopes
have opposite signs (EGB, PUY, UGR).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e13267">Trends in RH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are similar, the overall and dry
(RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are similar, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibit similar trends: this implies that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are probably influenced by RH but also have an
intrinsic aerosol trend (APP, BIR, MZW, SGP).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e13334">Trends in RH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are similar, but the dry (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %) and overall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are dissimilar and the trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are also dissimilar: this implies that the RH influence is major (THD, CPR). THD and CPR are coastal stations with a dominant influence of sea salt. At THD on the North America western coast, RH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are ss decreasing, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are ss increasing and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are also ss decreasing but with lower slope and ss than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Further, the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trends were less ss and exhibited much lower slopes, suggesting that the large sea salt particles are probably sensitive to the RH decrease, leading to the decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend. The 10-year trends show that RH decreasing trends are particularly important until 2015 and likely explain the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ss positive 10-year trends ending in 2012 and 2013. At CPR, a coastal site in the Caribbean, RH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are ss increasing, but the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends do not have the same shape or statistical significance as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. As observed at THD, the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trends at CPR are less
ss and have much lower slopes than PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trends.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e13546">As mentioned in the instrumental section, RH trends measured by the
nephelometers have to be considered with caution. Because the measurement RH
is only a secondary parameter, the instrument humidity sensors are typically
not maintained or calibrated with the same care as the scattered light
detectors. The influence of humidity variations on the optical property trends presented here can generally be considered to be low, apart from the cases of very hygroscopic particles like sea salt (e.g., at THD and CPR). A
better knowledge of the particle hygroscopic growth at low RH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) would be valuable in order to interpret <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends as well as trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Particle size trends</title>
      <p id="d1e13616">Both the scattering Ångström exponent and the backscattering
fraction are indicators of the particle's average size, with the general
interpretation that lower values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correspond to the
presence of larger particles albeit at different parts of the aerosol size
distribution (Collaud Coen et al., 2007). However, the relation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not uniquely defined for several reasons. First, the
scattering efficiency has an oscillating response to particle size rather
than a constant increase. Second, the measured particle size distribution is
usually composed of several modes. Since the sensitivity of scattering to
the mode depends on the size parameter (proportional to the ratio diameter–wavelength), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (here usually taken at 550 nm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(here usually computed with the 450–550 nm pair) do not always exhibit
similar sensitivity to the various size modes. Further, the extinction
Ångström exponent (analogous to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was found to be more
sensitive to fine-mode volume fraction if computed from long wavelengths and to fine-mode effective radius if computed from short wavelengths (Schuster
et al., 2006). Lastly, the relation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also depends
on the refractive index and consequently on the absorption coefficient
(Hervo, 2013): for a constant particle diameter, an increase in the refractive index real part will decrease <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but increase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page8894?><p id="d1e13721">In this analysis, some stations exhibit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends with the same sign (BRW, CPT, SMR, LLN, SPO, UGR), while for other stations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are in opposite directions (ALT, APP, BEO, BND, EGB, JFJ, MLO, MSY, PAL, PUY, SGP, SPO, ZEP). The plots showing the evolution of
the 10-year trends (Fig. 15) demonstrate that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can exhibit either similar or opposite trends depending on the considered periods (CPR, IPR, MLO, THD). The plots showing the evolution of the 10-year trends also
suggest that the variations of the 10-year slopes are often identical in sign but with different magnitude (e.g., shifted towards larger trend values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; see for example MLO, Fig. 18).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F18"><?xmltex \currentcnt{18}?><label>Figure 18</label><caption><p id="d1e13788">10-year slopes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at MLO. Ss negative and positive trends are plotted in blue and red, respectively. Not ss trends are
plotted in black. The dots correspond to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the upwards triangles to
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/8867/2020/acp-20-8867-2020-f18.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e13834">We can attribute both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ss positive trends (ALT, BRW,
SMR, LLN, THD, UGR) to a shift in the accumulation mode towards smaller sizes and a decrease in the coarse-mode particle concentration. In contrast, ss negative trends (BEO, CPR) for both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggest a shift to
bigger sizes, specifically an increase in the coarse-mode particle concentration and perhaps also a shift towards larger diameters of the
accumulation mode. At a boreal forest site in northern Europe (SMR), size
distribution data suggest that seasonal variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was caused by a shift in the accumulation mode and not by changes in the coarse-mode fraction (Luoma et al., 2019). Trends towards smaller particle sizes might be due to an increase in near-anthropogenic sources of pollution, to an increase in new particle formation, to a decrease in long-range transport of anthropogenic pollution, to increased scavenging of larger particles due
to changes in atmospheric conditions, to a modification of atmospheric
chemistry (Banzhaf et al., 2015) or to a change in both primary and
secondary natural aerosol (e.g., an increase in biogenic secondary aerosols and their precursors as demonstrated by Ciarelli et al., 2019). Trends
towards bigger particles can relate to a decrease in near-anthropogenic emissions, to larger influence of mineral dust caused by variation in desert
emissions or dust transport, to changes in agricultural activities or to an
increase in humidity.</p>
      <p id="d1e13892">For stations with opposite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends, the chemical
composition may play an important role in identifying reasons for the
changing trends. It is however out of the scope of this paper to study these
kinds of dependencies.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e13916">Overview of the aerosol optical property decadal MK trends ending between 2016 and 2018 for all the stations and per continent/region of the
world.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Regions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean trend for all</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean ss trend</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(nb stations/nb ss trends)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">stations (% yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (SD)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(% yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (SD)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Scattering coefficient </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All (37/25)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.19 (3.20)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.80 (3.53)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Africa (1/0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Asia (3/0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.79 (0.16)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe (12/8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.23 (3.32)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.32 (3.44)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N.-America (14/11)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.54 (2.74)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.41 (2.36)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pacific (2/2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.73 (4.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.73 (4.01)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Polar regions (5/4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.30 (4.00)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13 (4.60)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Backscattering coefficient  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All (28/17)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.97 (3.42)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.46 (4.16)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Africa (1/0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Asia (3/0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.69 (1.04)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe (12/8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.82 (3.43)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.12 (3.2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N. America (6/6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.32 (3.33)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.32 (3.33)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pacific (1/0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Polar regions (5/3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.52 (4.64)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.7 (6.14)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Absorption coefficient  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All (33/21)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.05 (3.26)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.42 (3.09)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Africa (1/0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Asia (3/2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.66 (3.63)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.35 (3.02)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe (15/12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.87 (3.34)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.48 (3.38)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N. America (6/3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.23 (2.14)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.77 (1.37)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pacific (2/1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.91 (3.79)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Polar regions (6/3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.73 (4.29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.19 (4.97)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Single scattering albedo  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All (27/20)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02 (0.28)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01 (0.32)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Africa (1/0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Asia (3/3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.13 (0.25)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13 (0.25)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe (11/9)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.03 (0.41)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06 (0.45)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N. America (6/5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.00 (0.13)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.03 (0.14)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pacific (2/1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.14 (0.18)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Polar regions (4/2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.07 (0.076)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.12 (0.00)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Backscattering fraction  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All (26/19)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.02 (1.46)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.39 (1.54)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Africa (1/1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.41</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Asia (3/2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.23 (0.70)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.06 (0.36)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe (10/6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.49 (0.99)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.81 (1.18)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N. America (6/5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.82 (0.98)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.95 (1.03)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pacific (1/1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Polar regions (5/4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.82 (2.57)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.42 (2.52)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Scattering Ångström exponent  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All (27/19)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.21 (1.71)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.32 (1.95)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Africa (1/0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Asia (3/2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.37 (0.18)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.28 (0.13)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe (11/8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.23 (0.94)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.45 (1.02)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N. America (6/6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.03 (2.98)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.03 (2.98)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pacific (1/0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Polar regions (5/3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.22 (1.62)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.39 (1.89)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Absorption Ångström exponent  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All (14/9)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.26 (2.42)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.01 (2.78)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Asia (2/2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.37 (1.31)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.37 (1.31)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe (3/2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.35 (0.43)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.59 (0.21)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N. America (4/2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.20 (3.12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.26 (3.49)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pacific (1/1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Polar regions (4/2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.16 (0.73)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.74 (0.50)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page8895?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Single scattering albedo trends</title>
      <p id="d1e14876">The single scattering albedo is the most important variable determining the
direct radiative impact of aerosol, so that its trend analysis – derived for the first time for a large number of stations – has a high relevance. The
filter-based absorption photometer artifacts lead to uncertain absorption absolute values that have no effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends but impart higher uncertainties to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. The results of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M809" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends depend directly on the relative values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. The global picture is nuanced, with about half
of ss positive, one-fifth of ss negative and one-fourth of not ss trends leading to an annual positive median trend of 0.02 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 4). The medians of ss trends are increasing in Asia, in the Arctic and in the Pacific but decreasing in Europe and North America. The largest median slopes are found in Asia and
in the Pacific (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.13 and 0.14 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), whereas the decreasing median slopes in
other regions are relatively small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The beginning of
the decrease in the aerosol burden varies with region; the earliest decrease is found in Europe in the 1980s (Tørseth et al., 2012), followed by North America in the 1990s (Bodhaine and Dutton, 1993; Hand et al., 2012) and by Asia some 10–15 years ago (Sogacheva et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2019;
Paulot et al., 2018). The median slope of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends seems
to be proportional to the length of the mitigation efforts, which for some
relevant pollutants (e.g., black carbon, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M819" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are still
ongoing. In Europe, the diversity of the timing of abatement policies with
earlier impact in western Europe than in eastern Europe (Vestreng et al., 2007; Crippa et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2017) is also directly visible in
the decreasing and increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends (Figs. 7 and 14),
respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e15030">These results suggest that policy regulations induced first a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase (cooling effect) and, in a second phase, a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decrease (warming effect). The Emission Database for Global Atmospheric
Research (EDGAR V4.3.2) (easy accessible via <uri>https://eccad.aeris-data.fr/</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020) shows that both the BC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions decreased rapidly during the 1990s and that currently emission reductions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are larger than the reductions for BC.
From this we conclude that the reduction of primary particles, such as BC,
leads first to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase, whereas the reduction of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a precursor of secondary particle formation, tends to result in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease. Moreover, emission changes can lead to
modification of the atmosphere chemistry. Banzhaf et al. (2015) show, for example, that sulfate and nitrate formation increased in efficiency by
factors between 20 % and 25 % between 1990 and 2009. The decrease in sulfate and
total nitrate concentrations is consequently smaller than expected (non-linear response), leading to lower trends than the trends in precursor
emissions and concentrations. This different timing and evolution in primary
and secondary aerosol concentrations could explain the evolution of the 10-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend at IPR, JFJ, BND and THD (Fig. 14), but the time series are not long enough to properly assess this change.</p>
      <p id="d1e15125">These observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are in line with the modeled impact of aerosol on climate (Zhao et al., 2019). They found that a global cooling effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K due to growth of aerosol burden caused by an increase in
energy use in the Northern Hemisphere (particularly in Asia) is counterbalanced by a global warming of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10 K caused by the decreased
aerosol emissions due to technology advances particularly in North America
and Europe. This illustrates the complex nexus of environmental pollution
regulations which have positive effects for health and the environment (air
pollution is a primary cause of premature deaths in much of the world,
Landrigan et al., 2018), but may have an adverse effect on efforts to reduce climate change. Ideally, abatement policy aimed at decreasing atmospheric
pollutant levels would take into account both climate and health impacts.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Comparison with other trends and causality</title>
      <p id="d1e15164">The current study has focused on surface in situ aerosol optical properties
at point locations, primarily in North America and Europe, but also in Asia
and the polar regions. Comparison with reported trends from other long-term measurements of aerosol properties (e.g., surface aerosol mass
concentrations, surface chemical mass concentrations, ground-based and
satellite column optical properties) can provide a more holistic and global view of changes in the atmospheric aerosol. Model simulations of aerosol trends can also supply insight into global impacts of emission
changes. We, thus, present a (non-exhaustive) comparison of the trend
results from this study with some other relevant aerosol trend studies in
the literature. The Supplement of Li et al. (2017) includes a summary of trends reported in the literature for aerosol optical depth (AOD), PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and several aerosol constituents (e.g., sulfate, BC).</p>
      <p id="d1e15176">There are some important caveats to keep in mind when comparing aerosol
trends across platforms and instruments. First, they represent different
aspects of the aerosol (chemical, physical, or optical), at different
conditions (dry or ambient), different wavelengths (300–1100 nm), different
techniques (in situ, REM) and different locations (ground-based, airborne or satellite). Second, there are differences in the statistical methodologies,
both in terms of methods used and data treatment. Third, the periods covered
often overlap, but are not the same. Further, some REM measurements can only
be made under certain conditions (e.g., daylight and cloud-free conditions
versus continuous sampling, over land versus over ocean), meaning temporal coverage may be quite different. Because of all these differences,
we only discuss general tendencies rather than absolute values when
comparing trends from different studies. Below we first compare our results
with trends from other surface in situ measurements and REM observations. Finally, we discuss causes of the observed trends and speculate specifically
on some of the trends in intensive aerosol properties, which have received
less<?pagebreak page8896?> attention in the literature than properties related to aerosol loading.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>4.4.1</label><title>Comparison with other surface, in situ aerosol trends</title>
      <p id="d1e15186">A comparison of the present-day trends derived here to our previous trend ending in 2010 (CC2013) demonstrates that the larger number of stations,
particularly in Europe, permits a more detailed view of regional trends. The
current wide coverage across continental Europe shows decreasing present-day
trends. Decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends were confirmed for individual stations (e.g., SMR, Luoma et
al., 2019; PAL, Lihavainen et al., 2015b; ARN, Sorribas et al., 2019), as
well as at ACTRIS sites including JFJ, HPB, IPR, IZO, PAL, PUY, SMR and UGR
(Pandolfi et al., 2018). There are some discrepancies in the trends between our current study and Pandolfi et al. (2018) that seem to be principally due
to differences in the analyzed periods. Three additional years of data were
included in this study and some older periods included in Pandolfi et al. (2018) were invalidated following the evaluations described in Sect. 2.4.
The European <inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends computed by Pandolfi et al. (2018)
are similar to the results of this study for most of the stations, in that
they also found a general ss increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. In North America the ss decreasing trends in aerosol extensive properties
observed in CC2013 are found to have continued in this work with the
extended datasets. These results are confirmed by the two other trend studies for in situ aerosol optical properties in North America. While the methodology and time period of Sherman et al. (2015) were different, the
sign and ss of their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends for BND and
SGP were the same as reported here. White et al. (2016) found a decreasing
trend in absorption coefficient (estimated from light transmittance
measurements on 24 h filter samples) at 110 IMPROVE stations for the
2003–2014 period. SPO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends for the
1979–2014 period (Sheridan et al., 2016) do agree with CC2013 results,
whereas the 1979–2018 trends reported in this study suggest an evolution
towards more ss positive trends. The very low aerosol concentrations in
Antarctica and the difference in the MK algorithm could however also explain
the differences amongst these three analyses.</p>
      <p id="d1e15318">There have been multiple trend studies on carbon species (also referred to as BC, elemental carbon, equivalent black carbon, brown carbon or other terms) which are closely related to aerosol absorption. A decreasing trend in BC concentration is found in Europe (Singh et al., 2018;
Kutzner et al., 2018; Grange et al., 2020), related primarily to traffic emission decreases rather than changes in wood burning and/or industrial
emissions. Similarly, Lyamani et al. (2011) noted a decrease in BC in
southern Spain due to the 2008 economic crisis. In contrast, Davuliene et
al. (2019) reported an increasing trend in equivalent black carbon (eBC) for
the Arctic site of TIK. In North America, White et al. (2016) found that the
decreasing elemental carbon trend at IMPROVE sites was larger than the
aerosol absorption trend at the same sites due to the impact of Fe content
in mineral dust. BC trends in the Arctic have been extensively studied
(e.g., AMAP, 2015; Sharma et al., 2019, and references therein) and suggest a decreasing trend. This is consistent with our general trend in absorption
for the polar regions (Table 4), although for individual stations most trends were statistically insignificant.</p>
      <p id="d1e15321">Particulate mass (PM) and visibility are other metrics for atmospheric
aerosol loading that can be most readily compared with our trends in aerosol
scattering. Tørseth et al. (2012) detailed decreases in PM across Europe, while Hand et al. (2014, 2019) report significant decreases in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
across the USA, with larger trends in the eastern than in the western USA. Both these trends were also confirmed by the PM trend analysis in Mortier et al. (2020) and are consistent with our reported scattering trends. Li et al. (2016)
used visibility to assess trends in atmospheric haze and aerosol extinction
coefficient around the world. The time delay in when the trends switch sign
between North America (late 1970s), Europe (early 1980s) and China (mid
2000s) correlates with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends, and the trend differences between the eastern and western parts of the USA and Europe are consistent with what is presented in our study.</p>
      <p id="d1e15344">Many atmospheric aerosols are formed in the atmosphere rather than being
directly emitted, so understanding trends in aerosol precursors is also
relevant for understanding changes in the atmospheric aerosol. Our study
found similar results for scattering to those found for sulfate trends (Aas et al., 2019), i.e., decreasing sulfate trends across Europe and the USA, albeit with the sulfate decrease in Europe beginning before the decrease was observed in the USA. Aas et al. (2019) also describe potential increases in sulfate in India and increases followed by decreases in SE Asia. Vestreng et al. (2007) monitored the sulfur dioxide emission
reduction in Europe and concluded that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reductions were
largest in the 1990s, with a first decrease in western Europe in the 1980s followed by a large decrease in eastern Europe in the 1990s. Similarly, Crippa et al. (2016) simulated a larger impact of policy reduction in
western Europe than in eastern Europe for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M849" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC between 1970 and 2010. Likewise, Huang et al. (2017) simulated the non-methane
volatile organic compound emissions and found a rapid decrease in Europe and in North America since the 1990s, whereas the emissions of Africa and
Asia clearly increased between 1970 and 2012.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>4.4.2</label><title>Comparison with remote sensing trends</title>
      <p id="d1e15386">A significant advantage of many REM platforms is their global coverage.
Satellites often provide coverage over both land and ocean, and the major ground-based REM network AERONET (Holben et al., 1998) is more globally
representative than the sites used in this study. However, there are some
inherent limitations in comparing aerosol optical property<?pagebreak page8897?> trends from REM
retrievals with surface in situ trends. Our study used aerosol optical measurements made at low RH (typically RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) at the surface,
while column aerosol optical retrievals are made at ambient conditions and
represent the atmospheric column including layers aloft. Only in the
situation of a well-mixed atmosphere will it be reasonable to compare trends in surface in situ optical properties with those obtained by ground-based or satellite retrievals. It has also to be mentioned that
satellite measurements are less sensitive to the near-ground layers containing the greatest aerosol load. Thus, while our trends can be compared
with those for column aerosol properties, there is no reason to expect them
to be in complete agreement. Below we discuss trends in PM, AOD, column
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and column SSA.</p>
      <p id="d1e15407">Satellites have been used to assess the decreasing PM trends in North
America and Europe and also to estimate PM trends in other regions with
sparse surface measurements. For example, Nam et al. (2017) evaluated the
trend in satellite-derived PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over Asia and reported mixed annual trend
values depending on the subregion they looked at. Li et al. (2017) found
satellite-derived PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to continuously increase in some parts of Asia
(e.g., in India) for the 1989–2013 period – we also find an increasing trend
(for aerosol absorption) at the one site we studied in India (MUK). For
China, Li et al. (2017) report that the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trend transitions from an
increasing to a decreasing trend, with the transition occurring in the 2006–2008 time period similarly to the sulfate trend pattern reported by Aas et al. (2019). The in situ measurements from China (WLG) and Taiwan (LLN) used in our study are not long enough to detect this transition.</p>
      <p id="d1e15437">Multiple ground-based REM studies (e.g., Yoon et al., 2016; Wei et al.,
2019; Mortier et al., 2020) report decreasing trends in AOD over the USA and Europe, with larger decreasing trends over Europe than over the USA, which is the case in our study (see Table 4) as well. The lack of measurements in
many regions, similar to the lack of representativeness in the surface in situ aerosol sites discussed in this study (Asia, Africa, South America, etc.), is also emphasized. Ningombam et al. (2019) analyze AOD 1995–2018 trends from 53 remote and high-altitude sites, of which 21 had ss negative
trends. Regionally, Ningombam found primarily negative trends at sites in
the USA, Europe and the polar regions. Their findings for sites in China and India suggested mixed trends, with some being positive and some negative in those regions. Some of the sites in Ningombam et al. (2019) were also
involved in our study. The trends they find for AOD at LLN and MLO are
similar to ours (i.e., not ss trends) at SPO (i.e., ss increasing) and at
SGP (i.e., decreasing (note: they refer to SGP as “car”)). Their results are
different for IZO (we found no ss trends for scattering, while they reported ss decreasing AOD) and for BRW and BIR (we found ss decreasing scattering
trends, but they found not ss AOD trends).</p>
      <p id="d1e15440">Satellite retrievals can offer an even more global picture of aerosol trends
than the surface-based REM data. Various satellite trend analyses present a picture of trends in aerosol optical depth for different regions of the
world that is quite consistent across satellite (and ground-based) AOD
datasets. For example, for the satellite literature that we surveyed, all
found decreases in AOD over the USA and Europe (e.g., Hsu et al., 2012; Mehta et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2017; Alfaro-Contreras et al., 2017; Wei et al.,
2019) consistent with what we have reported for the AOD from ground-based,
REM instruments. As we note above, this is also consistent with surface
in situ scattering trends. There are some discrepancies in the various satellite-derived AOD trends over Asia that are likely due to differences in time period of analysis,
trend methodology, regional definitions and/or perhaps satellite data
product. Nam et al. (2017) found that AOD trends varied depending on what part of Asia was being evaluated. Zhao et al. (2017) reported an increasing then
decreasing trend over China, which was also suggested by others (e.g.,
Sogachova et al., 2019; Alfaro-Contreras et al., 2017). Wei et al. (2019)
found a slightly negative but statistically insignificant AOD trend for
China. Our study found statistically insignificant trends in aerosol loading
for both the high-altitude surface site in China (WLG) and in Taiwan (LLN),
perhaps because measurements at both these sites span the AOD
increase/decrease periods mentioned by Zhao et al. (2017). Over India,
increasing trends in satellite AOD were reported by all the literature we
surveyed (e.g., Wei et al., 2019; Mehta et al., 2016; Hsu et al., 2012; Alfara-Contreras et al., 2017). This is consistent with our finding of an
increasing trend for aerosol absorption for the one Indian site (MUK) in our
study.</p>
      <p id="d1e15444">The satellite measurements also enable evaluation of aerosol loading changes
in regions with few to no long-term surface in situ aerosol optical property measurements. The Middle East exhibited an increasing trend in AOD, while South America exhibited variable trends (e.g., Wei et al., 2019; Metha
et al., 2016; Hsu et al., 2012; Alfaro-Contreras et al., 2017). Wei et al. (2019) found a statistically insignificant trend in South America and
suggested it was due to complex and changing aerosol sources. Mehta et al. (2016) looked specifically at Brazil and found a decreasing annual AOD
trend but an increasing AOD trend in springtime. Decreasing AOD trends were found over central Africa (Wei et al., 2019), over the African deserts
(Metha et al., 2016) and on African coasts (Alfaro-Contreras et al., 2017)
regardless of whether they are dominated by smoke aerosols (southwest) or dust (northwest).</p>
      <p id="d1e15447">In addition to AOD, trends for other column aerosol property such as column
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and column SSA can be considered. While there appear to be
many investigations focusing on trends in column aerosol properties other
than AOD at individual sites, there are only a few papers that take a more
global, multi-site approach (e.g., Li et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2017;
Mortier et al., 2020). There have been several studies related to changes in
column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M857" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using AERONET REM retrievals. For example, Li et al. (2014) suggest an increase in column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the USA and a decrease over Europe and at<?pagebreak page8898?> most sites in Asia. More recently, Mortier et
al. (2020) found ss decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M859" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends in Europe and North America and ss increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M860" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends in Asia and Africa. Zhao
et al. (2017) used satellite retrievals and reported decreasing trends of
column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over both the USA and Europe and a not ss column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M862" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend over China. Nam et al. (2018) suggested there was an
increasing trend in the column extinction Ångström exponent over Asia based on satellite observations. These findings are mostly consistent with
our results (Table 4) which indicated decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M863" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends in the
USA and Europe but perhaps an increasing trend in Asia.</p>
      <p id="d1e15539">Comparisons of in situ and column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are more fraught, because, in addition to the above-mentioned caveats related to comparing surface and column measurements, column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M865" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can only be obtained
from REM techniques under higher aerosol loading conditions. For example,
Kahn and Gaitley (2015) indicate that MISR SSA retrieval requires
AOD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15–0.2. Similarly, AERONET retrievals require AOD (at 440 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 (Dubovik et al., 2000). This limits the sites for
which column SSA can be retrieved. Andrews et al. (2017) present a plot
derived from global model simulations suggesting more than 80 % of the
globe has annual AOD values below 0.2, and, indeed, many of the surface
in situ sites discussed here are in remote locations with annual AOD consistently below 0.2. Andrews et al. (2017) also suggest there is a
systematic variability of SSA with loading that might result in column SSA
biases if retrievals are constrained to higher levels of AOD. With these
caveats in mind, we can compare our surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M868" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend results
with satellite column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M869" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends.
Li et al. (2014) studied 2000–2013 trends in column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M870" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
select AERONET sites. Their findings suggest that column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M871" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
increasing in the USA, Europe and Asia. However, they noted that the uncertainty in these trends is high because they used level 1.5 data (AOD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M872" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4)
in order to have enough data points for their analysis. Zhao et al. (2017)
utilized satellite retrievals and reported decreasing trends in column
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the eastern USA and Europe and a not statistically significant trend over China for the 2001–2015 period. Their results over
the USA and western Europe are consistent with the overall regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M874" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends reported in this study (i.e., Table 4), although Fig. 7 suggests there is a fair amount of variability in the surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M875" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends at the individual sites in these two regions. Our study found
an increasing trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M876" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the surface in Asia (based on three sites), which is consistent with Li et al.'s column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M877" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend
but not with the lack of trend in column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M878" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over China
suggested by Zhao et al. (2017). But, as noted above, remote sensing
retrievals of column SSA should be considered with caution and, clearly,
further effort in column SSA trend analysis is warranted.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4.SSS3">
  <label>4.4.3</label><title>Causality</title>
      <p id="d1e15706">While it is beyond the scope of this effort to explore in depth the causes
of the observed trends of aerosol optical properties, some general comments
can be made. First, tendencies in regional trends for variables representing
aerosol loading (e.g., surface in situ aerosol scattering, PM, and AOD) are generally consistent across multiple datasets. Overall, the main cause of
observed decreasing trends in loading is likely a strong reduction of both primary aerosols and precursors of secondary aerosol formation connected to
mitigation strategies on regional to continental scales (e.g., Huang et al.,
2017; Crippa et al., 2016; Pandolfi et al., 2016; Vestreng et al., 2007).
Detailed analysis of PM reductions and composition changes in Europe and the
USA has enabled attribution of the trends to changes in source types and emission levels (e.g., Hand et al., 2019; Pandolfi et al., 2016; Ealo et
al., 2018).
The explanations of the trends based on long-term measurements are supported
by modeling efforts. Like many satellite retrievals, model simulations also provide global coverage and, in addition, can be used to investigate reasons
for observed changes in aerosol. Model simulations described in Li et al. (2017) suggested that the decrease in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M879" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in western and central Europe is
principally due to sulfate, whereas in eastern Europe decreases in organic
aerosol also play a role. The EMEP status report (2019) notes that the difference in emission trends between western and eastern Europe has become more significant since 2010. Further, the EMEP status report suggests that
estimated increasing emissions of all pollutants since 2000 in eastern Europe are mainly influenced by emission estimates for the remaining Asian
areas in the EMEP modeled domain. Similarly, Zhao et al. (2019) used a model to attribute the AOD, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M881" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases in
North America and Europe to considerable emission reductions in all major
pollutants except in mineral dust and ammonia.</p>
      <p id="d1e15740">For Asia, modeling by Li et al. (2017) suggests aerosol changes are principally related to increases in organic aerosol and secondary inorganic
aerosol, whereas the increases in BC, nitrate and ammonium are comparably
moderate. Yoon et al. (2016) use a model to ascribe the observed increases
in AOD over India to increases in BC and water-soluble materials – both related to anthropogenic emissions. Over China, Yoon et al. (2016) observe a disconnect between the model chemical composition and the measured AOD, which
they explain by noting that the measurement sites they rely on in the region
are far from the population centers where most of the emissions occur. Zhao
et al. (2019) use a model to attribute the increase in AOD followed by a
decrease in AOD to emission increases induced by rapid economic development
until 2008–2009 followed by decreases in both anthropogenic primary aerosols
and aerosol precursor gases.</p>
      <p id="d1e15743">Zhao et al. (2017) suggest that the larger reductions in aerosol precursors
(e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M882" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M883" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions) rather than primary aerosols,
including mineral dust and black carbon, can explain the decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M884" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M885" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed over<?pagebreak page8899?> Europe and the USA. This is because the secondary aerosols formed from such precursors tend to be primarily
scattering, so less secondary aerosol would change the relative balance
between scattering and absorption, driving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> down. Similarly, secondary aerosol particles tend to be small, so a decreasing trend in
secondary aerosol would change the relative contribution of small to large
particles in the aerosol size distribution and lead to a decreasing trend in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M887" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, in Asia simultaneous increases in aerosol
precursors and BC before 2006 and a simultaneous decrease after 2011 explains the trends <inline-formula><mml:math id="M888" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M889" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> they observed
there. Modifications in emissions of aerosol precursors also impact the
atmospheric chemistry, leading to non-linear response of the formation of secondary inorganic aerosol (Banzhaf et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e15835">While regional changes in emissions are one driving factor in trends,
because of long-range transport, out-of-region changes in sources also have the potential to affect trends. For example, Saharan dust impacts CPR, IZO
and UGR (e.g., Denjean et al., 2016; Rodriguez et al., 2011; Garcia et al.,
2017; Lyamani et al., 2008), and its emissions may change (decrease) in a warmer world (Evan et al., 2016). Other examples of sites clearly impacted
by long-range transport include IZO impacted by northern African pollution due to developing industries (Rodriguez et al., 2011) and the high-altitude station of MLO which is impacted by Asian pollution (e.g., Perry et al.,
1999). Mountainous stations can also be affected by modifications of the
planetary boundary layer or of the continuous aerosol layer heights
responding to ground temperature or mesoscale synoptic weather changes
(e.g., Collaud Coen et al., 2018, and references therein).
The oscillation in trend sign for several variables at the Arctic sites is
potentially caused by the very low aerosol loading, but the Arctic region is
changing rapidly and the impact of evolving transport patterns, atmospheric
removal processes or local sources cannot be excluded (e.g., Willis et al.,
2018) and requires closer study.
While both increasing and decreasing levels of aerosol due to changes in
anthropogenic emissions have been observed, the role of non-anthropogenic
sources may become more important in the future. For example, climate change
also affects soil drought, and the positive feedback between drought and wildfires can also affect aerosol optical properties (Hallar et al., 2017;
McClure and Jaffe, 2018). The number and intensity of wildfires are increasing in several regions (e.g., Moreira et al., 2020; Turco et al.,
2018; Hand et al., 2014). McClure and Jaffe (2018) confirmed an increasing
trend of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M890" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> 98th percentiles in the northwestern USA due to an increase in wildfires superimposed on the global decrease in anthropogenic emissions. Yoon et al. (2016) also note an increase in extreme AOD events in the
western USA, which they hypothesize could be due to wildfires. Another example of potential changes in natural aerosol may take place in the
Arctic, where decreases in sea ice coverage might play a role in natural
aerosol increases in the region (e.g., Willis et al., 2018) (decreases in
sea ice coverage may also lead to enhanced anthropogenic emissions due to
increased human activity (e.g., Aliabadi et al., 2015)). Whether such
changes in natural aerosol emissions lead to observable changes in overall
aerosol trends or trends at the extremes of aerosol loading is something to
look for in future trend analyses.</p>
      <p id="d1e15848">Detailed studies at each station are necessary to discriminate between
direct causes like changes in anthropogenic emissions and indirect causes related to general climate changes such as drought, changes in surface
albedo, biogenic aerosol concentration, atmospheric chemistry, sea ice
coverage or atmospheric circulation patterns. The availability of the
homogenized dataset from this study will provide a useful tool for these types of analyses.</p>
      <p id="d1e15851">In order to get a truly global overview of aerosol trends, surface in situ measurements need to be paired with model simulations and satellite
observations. This will enable evaluation of the uncertainty in regional and
global trends based on deficiencies in spatial and/or temporal coverage.
Satellites and models are able to fill the gaps in coverage from
ground-based measurements, but both rely on surface measurements for ground
truth.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusion and recommendations</title>
      <p id="d1e15865">This second long-term trend analysis of in situ aerosol measurements derived from stations with large spatial representation leads to a more coherent
picture of aerosol radiative properties around the world. Results from this
study provide evidence that the aerosol load has significantly decreased
over the last 2 decades in North America and Europe. The low number of stations on the other continents means global tendencies cannot be assessed and the results are more variable. The mean extensive property trends are
decreasing for all parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M891" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bsp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M893" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and all regions apart from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M894" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend in
the South Pacific and in the polar regions (see Table 4). These decreases in aerosol burden are assumed to be a direct consequence of decreases in
primary particles and particulate precursors such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M895" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
due to pollution abatement policies. This assumption is supported by trend
results for the USA, where the inflection point between not ss and ss decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year trends consistently occurred over the same time period (2009–2012) for all central and eastern stations. While the
annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M898" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M899" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M900" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M901" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the ss trends in all
regions) is larger than that for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M902" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M903" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time
series are not long enough to detect the beginning of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M904" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreasing 10-year trends.</p>
      <p id="d1e16023">The single scattering albedo trend analysis – derived for the first time
from a large number of stations – has the greatest climatic relevance. The
uncertainty of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M905" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend is higher than for the other
aerosol parameters due to uncertainties in absorption coefficient absolute
value. The general picture is nuanced, with ss positive trends mostly in Asia and eastern Europe and ss negative in western Europe and<?pagebreak page8900?> North America, leading to an annual positive median trend of 0.02 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M906" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. It appears that the historical abatement policies for gaseous species and primary aerosol
particles (e.g., in western Europe in the 1980s) have resulted in present-day decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M907" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends in the Western Hemisphere, whereas more recent regulations (Asia) are leading to increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M908" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. Again, this suggests it is necessary to consider how
regulatory policies designed to improve health and environmental outcomes
impact climate change efforts and vice versa.</p>
      <p id="d1e16071">The backscattering fraction and scattering Ångström exponent trends
relate mostly to the average particle size distribution and to the relative
concentrations in the accumulation and coarse modes of the size
distribution, but the mean refractive index also plays a role. The
interpretation of the results for these parameters is less straightforward
as, depending on the site, the trends for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M909" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M910" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may have the
same or opposite signs. The causes of particle size change encompass not
only the primary aerosol emission, but also the emission of secondary aerosol precursors, the particle chemistry and condensation rate, the hygroscopic
growth and the humidity condition during the measurement. In general, the
interpretation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M911" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M912" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M913" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">å</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends is more difficult,
and the effects of global climate change on aridity, wildfire frequency and
intensity, planetary boundary layer height, transportation patterns or
natural oscillation must also be investigated in order to find the causality
of aerosol optical property changes.</p>
      <p id="d1e16121">This study was limited by the lack of information from many WMO regions.
Since 2010, the number of stations with time series longer than 10 years has
doubled (24 in 2010, 52 currently), so that the spatial coverage is improved and various additional environments are covered in Europe, North America and the polar regions. A first result of this study is that, while aerosol exhibits a very weak spatial and temporal homogeneity, general features can
be deduced with the present station density in Europe and North America,
while the picture in the polar regions is less clear. The few stations in Asia, Africa, South America and the Oceania/Pacific region cannot, however, be
considered representative of their continents/regions, first, because of their small number and, second, because mountainous and coastal environments
are overrepresented relative to the continental environment with rural,
forest or desert footprints. According to information from the GAWSIS
metadata base, more stations located in underrepresented regions are now in
operation, which promises a better spatial coverage in a few years; however, sustaining these operations is still an open issue (the longest time series
in India closed in 2016), and not all stations are actually providing their data in open access with the proper associated metadata. Even in developed
countries, the financial resources needed to operate long-term monitoring
are not always secure, leading to the closing of stations, to a decrease in time series quality and/or to a delay in data submission to the
international data banks.</p>
      <p id="d1e16125">In this study, a number of datasets were not used or were only partially
used due to the occurrence of breakpoints following instrumental or inlet changes or even calibration shifts. High-quality data rely on attention to international recommendations for measurements, on a regular maintenance
schedule, on participation in inter-comparison efforts and on high-level quality control. The existence of metadata, logbooks and a station's history
is crucial for determining causes of any detected breakpoints and is necessary to enable the generation of a final homogenized time series for trend analysis. This homogenization process provides us with an important finding:
a critical review of the data by others outside the measurement network is
very important in improving the quality of the reported data. This study has
resulted in a large improvement to the EBAS database and in the quality of
the reported datasets.</p>
      <p id="d1e16128">Based on the results of this study and with a view toward future trend
analyses, the following recommendations concerning the improvement of
aerosol optical time series are raised.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16133">The station history, metadata and logbooks have to be detailed and handled
with great care, since they are absolutely necessary to evaluate long-term
trends on homogenized time series.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16137">Time series are affected not only by the instrument type or inlet changes,
but also by replacement by instruments of the same type and by shifts in
calibrations.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16141">A rotation between instruments in a network (e.g., to enable repairs) will
decrease potential missed data losses but has a potential to increase
breakpoints in the time series, particularly in the wavelength dependence of
the parameters.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16145">The scattering and backscattering coefficients, the backscattering
fraction and the scattering Ångström exponents are very sensitive to
the humidity conditions in the nephelometers due to the hygroscopic growth
of particles even at low RH. The nephelometer humidity sensors should be
better checked and characterized in order to assess long-term trends of dry
particles.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16149">Long-term trend analysis should not be computed on time series shorter than
10 years, since short datasets lead to a larger probability of false trend
detection because of the low number of elements in the time series.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16153">Stations with long-term records have to be sustained and their funding
should be assured in order to study the future impact of aerosol on climate
change. Station maintenance as well as new station creation in regions with a low spatial coverage (Africa, South America, Asia and Oceania) should be
particularly encouraged.</p></list-item></list></p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e16161">Almost all datasets are available as level 2 NASA/AMES files at EBAS
(<uri>http://ebas.nilu.no/</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020) at an hourly resolution. The screened
datasets used for this study aggregated as daily medians can be found at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21336/c4dy-yw57" ext-link-type="DOI">10.21336/c4dy-yw57</ext-link> (Collaud Coen et al., 2020b).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e16170">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8867-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8867-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e16179">CLM, YL and EA gathered datasets and applied additional QC to the time
series. MCC did a further QC, computed the long-term trends and analyzed the results. MCC and EA wrote the manuscript. NB, JH, PL, CLM, MP, and PZ
extensively contributed to the revision of the manuscript. All the other
co-authors contributed to the measurements of aerosol optical properties at the 52 stations and to the manuscript review.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e16185">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e16191">The authors would like to thank the numerous, but unfortunately unnamed,
technical and scientific staff members of the stations as well as many
students included in these analyses, whose dedication to quality for decades
have made this paper possible. Provision of data from this study has mainly been acquired in the framework of NOAA-FAN
(<uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aero/net/</uri>); ACTRIS, under the ACTRIS-2
(Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases Research InfraStructure) project
supported by European Union (grant agreement no. 654109) and the ACTRIS PPP project under grant agreement no. 739530; and IMPROVE
(<uri>http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/Improve/</uri>). Some European sites and
measurements were also supported by the Co-operative Programme for
Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long-range Transmission of Air pollutants
in Europe (EMEP) under UNECE. The authors are also grateful to the following persons and organizations.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16202">AMY: the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development
Program “Development of Monitoring and Analysis Techniques for Atmospheric Composition in Korea” under grant KMA2018-00522</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16206">APP: Appalachian State College of Arts and Sciences, electronics
technician Michael Hughes, machinist Dana Greene</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16210">BEO: ACTRIS-BG project</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16214">BIR: project no. 80026 “Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme” (AMAP) under EU action “Black Carbon in the Arctic”. Aerosol optical/physical properties at Birkenes II are financed by the
Norwegian Environment Agency</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16218">CGO: the Australian Bureau of Meteorology and all the staff from the Bureau of Meteorology and CSIRO,
particularly John Gras who instigated the measurements of aerosol scattering
and absorption</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16222">CPR: Para La Naturaleza and the nature reserve of Cabezas de San Juan and
the support of grants AGS 0936879 and EAR-1331841.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16226">GSN: the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research
Foundation of Korea (2017R1D1A1B06032548).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16230">SMR: the European Union Seventh Framework Programme
under grant agreement no. 262254,  the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research
and innovation programme under grant agreement no.
654109 via project ACTRIS-2 and grant agreement no. 689443
via project iCUPE, the Academy
of Finland (project no. 307331).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16234">IMPROVE: IMPROVE is a collaborative association of state, tribal, and
federal agencies, and international partners. Support for IMPROVE
nephelometers comes from the National Park Service. The assumptions,
findings, conclusions, judgments, and views presented herein are those of
the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the
National Park Service (stations: ACA, BBE, CRG, GBN, GLR, GSM, HGC, MCN,
MRN, MZW, NCC, RMN, SCN, SHN).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16238">IZO: Measurement Programme within the Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW)
Programme at the Izaña Atmospheric Research Centre, financed by AEMET.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16242">JFJ: Urs Baltensperger, Günther Wehrle, Erik Herrmann; the
International Foundation High Altitude Research Station Jungfraujoch and
Gornergrat (HSFJG), the Swiss contributions (GAW-CH and GAW-CH-Plus) to the
Global Atmosphere Watch programme of the World Meteorological Organization
(WMO) which are coordinated by MeteoSwiss; the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and
Innovation, SERI, under contract number 15.0159-1 (ACTRIS-2 project). The
opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect
the official views of the Swiss Government.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16247">LLN: the Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration and the
Ministry of Science and Technology for the support to individual PI's research funding.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16251">MSY: the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
under grant agreement no. 654109, MINECO (Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness)
and FEDER funds under the PRISMA project (CGL2012-39623-C02/00) and under
the HOUSE project (CGL2016-78594-R), the MAGRAMA (Spanish Ministry of
Agriculture, Food and Environment) and the Generalitat de Catalunya
(AGAUR 2014 SGR33, AGAUR 2017 SGR41 and the DGQA). Marco Pandolfi is funded
by a Ramón y Cajal Fellowship (RYC-2013-14036) awarded by the Spanish
Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16255">MUK: the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland, project grants (264242,
268004, 284536, and 287440) received from Academy of Finland; Business
Finland and DBT, India sponsored project (2634/31/2015), the Centre of
Excellence in Atmospheric Science funded by the Finnish Academy of Sciences
(307331), and an esteemed collaboration of FMI and TERI.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16259">NOAA stations (BND, BRW, MLO, SGP, SPO, SUM, THD): Derek Hageman for all
his programming efforts for NOAA and NFAN stations, John Ogren for
initiating the expanded NFAN measurements and NOAA's Climate Program Office
for funding</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16263">PAY: the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16267">PUY: the staff of OPGC and LaMP, INSU-CNRS and the University Clermont
Auvergne, and the financial support from ACTRIS-France National Research
infrastructure and CNRS-INSU long-term observing program.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16271">SGP: the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement
Program via Argonne National Laboratory, the DOE SGP ARM Climate Research
Facility staff and scientists.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16275">TIK: the Aethalometer was supplied by Russ Schnell; Tiksi overall logistics and operations by Taneil Uttal and Sara Morris (NOAA/ESRL/PSD,
Boulder, CO, USA).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16279">UGR: the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through projects CGL2016-81092-R,
CGL2017-90884-REDT and RTI2018-101154-A-I00.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16283">WLG: China Meteorological Administration, National Scientific Foundation of
China (41675129), National Key Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2016YFC0203305 and 2016YFC0203306), and Basic Research Project of the Chinese Academy of Meteorological of Sciences (2017Z011) and the Innovation Team for Haze-fog
Observation and Forecasts of China Meteorological Administration.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e16287">ZEP: the Swedish EPA's (Naturvårdsverket) Environmental monitoring
program (Miljöövervakning), the Knut-and-Alice-Wallenberg Foundation
within the ACAS project (Arctic Climate Across Scales, project no.
2016.0024), the research engineers Tabea Henning, Ondrej Tesar and Birgitta
Noone from ACES and the staff from the Norwegian Polar Institute (NPI), NPI
for substantial long-term support in maintaining the measurements, Maria
Burgos and Dominic Heslin-Rees (ACES) for preparing the data.</p></list-item></list></p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e16292">The funding mentioned above comprises funding sources specific to the operational measurements at each of the stations. This study has not received any designed funding.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e16298">This paper was edited by Yves Balkanski and reviewed by Wenche Aas and two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Aas, W., Mortier, A., Bowersox, V., Cherian, R., Faluvegi, G., Fagerli, H.,
Hand, J., Klimont, Z., Galy-Lacaux, C., Lehmann, C. M. B., Lund Myhre, C.,
Oliviè, D., Sato, K., Quaas, J., Rao, P. S. P., Schulz, M., Shindell,
D., Skeie, R. B., Stein, A., Takemura, T., Tsyro, S., Vet, R., and Xu, X.:
Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur, Sci. Rep.,
9, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alfaro-Contreras, R., Zhang, J., Reid, J. S., and Christopher, S.: A study of 15-year aerosol optical thickness and direct shortwave aerosol radiative effect trends using MODIS, MISR, CALIOP and CERES, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13849–13868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13849-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-13849-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Aliabadi, A. A., Staebler, R. M., and Sharma, S.: Air quality monitoring in communities of the Canadian Arctic during the high shipping season with a focus on local and marine pollution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2651–2673, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2651-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2651-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>AMAP Assessment 2015: Black carbon and ozone as Arctic climate forcers,
Oslo, Norway, Report No. 8279710922, available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/amap-assessment-2015-black-carbon-and-ozone-as-arctic-climate-forcers/1299">https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/amap-assessment-2015-black-carbon-and-ozone-as-arctic-climate-forcers/1299</ext-link> (last access: 21 July 2020), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L. and Ogren, J. A.: Determining aerosol radiative properties
using the TSI 3563 integrating nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 29, 57–69,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Anderson, T. L., Masonis, S. J., Covert, D. S., Ahlquist, N. C., Howell, S.
G., Clarke, A. D., and McNaughton, C. S.: Variability of aerosol optical
properties derived from in situ aircraft measurements during ACE-Asia, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 8647, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003247</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., Kinne, S., and Samset, B.: Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6041–6072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6041-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-6041-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andrews, E., Sheridan, P., Ogren, J. A., Hageman, D., Jefferson, A., Wendell,
J., Alastuey, A., Alados-Arboledas, L., Bergin, M., Ealo, M., Hallar, A. G.,
Hoffer, A., Kalapov, I., Keywood, M., Kim, J., Kim, S.-W., Kolonjari, F.,
Labuschagne, C., Lin, N.-H., Macdonald, A., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., McCubbin, I. B., Pandolfi, M., Reisen, F., Sharma, S., Sherman, J. P., Sorribas, M.,
and Sun, J.: Overview of the NOAA/ESRL Federated Aerosol Network, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 100, 123–135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0175.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0175.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Asmi, A., Collaud Coen, M., Ogren, J. A., Andrews, E., Sheridan, P., Jefferson, A., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Bukowiecki, N., Lihavainen, H., Kivekäs, N., Asmi, E., Aalto, P. P., Kulmala, M., Wiedensohler, A., Birmili, W., Hamed, A., O'Dowd, C., Jennings, S. G., Weller, R., Flentje, H., Fjaeraa, A. M., Fiebig, M., Myhre, C. L., Hallar, A. G., Swietlicki, E., Kristensson, A., and Laj, P.: Aerosol decadal trends – Part 2: In-situ aerosol particle number concentrations at GAW and ACTRIS stations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 895–916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-895-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-895-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Backman, J., Schmeisser, L., Virkkula, A., Ogren, J. A., Asmi, E., Starkweather, S., Sharma, S., Eleftheriadis, K., Uttal, T., Jefferson, A., Bergin, M., Makshtas, A., Tunved, P., and Fiebig, M.: On Aethalometer measurement uncertainties and an instrument correction factor for the Arctic, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 5039–5062, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-5039-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-5039-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Banzhaf, S., Schaap, M., Kranenburg, R., Manders, A. M. M., Segers, A. J., Visschedijk, A. J. H., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Kuenen, J. J. P., van Meijgaard, E., van Ulft, L. H., Cofala, J., and Builtjes, P. J. H.: Dynamic model evaluation for secondary inorganic aerosol and its precursors over Europe between 1990 and 2009, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1047–1070, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1047-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-1047-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bayazit, M. and Önöz, B.: To prewhiten or not to prewhiten in trend
analysis?, Hydro. Sci., 52, 611–624, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.3.669" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1623/hysj.53.3.669</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page8903?><ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Beaulieu, C., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., and Seidou, O.: Synthèse des techniques d'homognénéisation des séries climatiques et analyse
d'applicabilité aux séries de précipitations, Hydro. Sci. J.,
52, 18–37, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bernardoni, V., Ferrero, L., Soldan, F., Valentini, S., Massabo, D., Mocnik,
G., Gregoric, A., Cataldi, M., Bolzacchini, E., Prati, P., Valli, G., and
Vecchi, R.: Multi-wavelength aerosol absorption coefficient measurements:
instrument intercomparison and results of source and component modelling,
poster, European Aerosol Conference, Göteborg, Sweden, 25–30 September, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Blain, G. C.: The modified Mann–Kendall test: on the performance of three
variance correction approaches. Bragantia, 72, 416–425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/brag.2013.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1590/brag.2013.045</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bodhaine, B. A.: Aerosol absorption measurements at Barrow, Mauna Loa and
the South Pole, J. Geophys, Res.-Atmos., 100, 8967–8975.
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00513" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD00513</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bodhaine, B. A. and Dutton, E. G.: A long-term decrease in arctic haze at
Barrow, Alaska, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 947–950, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Anderson, T. L., and Campbell, D.: Calibration and
intercomparison of filter-based measurements of visible light absorption by
aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 30, 582–600, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868299304435" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868299304435</ext-link>,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bukowiecki, N., Weingartner, E., Gysel, M., Collaud Coen, M., Zieger, P.,
Herrmann, E., Steinbacher, M., Gäggeler, H. W., and Baltensperger, U.: A
review of more than 20 years of aerosol observation at the high altitude
research station Jungfraujoch, Switzerland (3580 m asl), Aerosol Air Qual.
Res., 16, 764–788, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0305" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0305</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Burgos, M., Andrews, E., Titos, G., Alados-Arboledas, L., Baltensperger, U., Day, D., Jefferson, A., Kalivitis, N., Kouvarakis, G., Mihalopoulis, N.,
Sherman, J. P., Sun, J., Weingartner, E., and Zieger, P.: Data Descriptor: A global view on the effect of water uptake on aerosol particle light
scattering, Sci. Data, 6, 157,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s1597-019-0158-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s1597-019-0158-7</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Butt, E. W., Turnock, S. T., Rigby, R., Reddington, C. L., Yoshioka, M.,
Johnson, J. S., Regayre, L. A., Pringle, K. J., Mann, G. W., and Spracklen,
D. V.: Global and regional trends in particulate air pollution and
attributable health burden over the past 50 years, Environ. Res. Lett.,
12, 104017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa87be" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aa87be</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Choi, M., Lim, H., Kim, J., Lee, S., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Garay, M. J., Hyer, E. J., Saide, P. E., and Liu, H.: Validation, comparison, and integration of GOCI, AHI, MODIS, MISR, and VIIRS aerosol optical depth over East Asia during the 2016 KORUS-AQ campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 4619–4641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4619-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-4619-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ciarelli, G., Theobald, M. R., Vivanco, M. G., Beekmann, M., Aas, W., Andersson, C., Bergström, R., Manders-Groot, A., Couvidat, F., Mircea, M., Tsyro, S., Fagerli, H., Mar, K., Raffort, V., Roustan, Y., Pay, M.-T., Schaap, M., Kranenburg, R., Adani, M., Briganti, G., Cappelletti, A., D'Isidoro, M., Cuvelier, C., Cholakian, A., Bessagnet, B., Wind, P., and Colette, A.: Trends of inorganic and organic aerosols and precursor gases in Europe: insights from the EURODELTA multi-model experiment over the 1990–2010 period, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4923–4954, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4923-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-4923-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Nyeki, S., Cozic, J., Henning, S.,
Verheggen, B., Gehrig, R., and Baltensperger, U.: Long-term trend analysis
of aerosol variables at the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D13213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007995" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007995</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G., Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-457-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Andrews, E., Asmi, A., Baltensperger, U., Bukowiecki, N., Day, D., Fiebig, M., Fjaeraa, A. M., Flentje, H., Hyvärinen, A., Jefferson, A., Jennings, S. G., Kouvarakis, G., Lihavainen, H., Lund Myhre, C., Malm, W. C., Mihapopoulos, N., Molenar, J. V., O'Dowd, C., Ogren, J. A., Schichtel, B. A., Sheridan, P., Virkkula, A., Weingartner, E., Weller, R., and Laj, P.: Aerosol decadal trends – Part 1: In-situ optical measurements at GAW and IMPROVE stations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 869–894, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-869-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-869-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Andrews, E., Aliaga, D., Andrade, M., Angelov, H., Bukowiecki, N., Ealo, M., Fialho, P., Flentje, H., Hallar, A. G., Hooda, R., Kalapov, I., Krejci, R., Lin, N.-H., Marinoni, A., Ming, J., Nguyen, N. A., Pandolfi, M., Pont, V., Ries, L., Rodríguez, S., Schauer, G., Sellegri, K., Sharma, S., Sun, J., Tunved, P., Velasquez, P., and Ruffieux, D.: Identification of topographic features influencing aerosol observations at high altitude stations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12289–12313, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12289-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-12289-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Andrews, E., Bigi, A., Romanens, G., Martucci, G., and Vuilleumier, L.: Effects of the prewhitening method, the time granularity and the time segmentation on the Mann–Kendall trend detection and the associated Sen's slope, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-178" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2020-178</ext-link>, in review, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Andrews, E., Alastuey, A., Arsov, T. P., Backman, J., Brem, B. T., Bukowiecki, N., Couret, C., Eleftheriadis, K., Flentje, H., Fiebig, M., Gysel-Beer, M., Hand, J. L., Hoffer, A., Hooda, R., Hueglin, C., Joubert, W., Keywood, M., Kim, J. E., Kim, S.-W., Labuschagne, C., Lin, N.-H., Lin, Y., Lund Myhre, C., Luoma, K., Lyamani, H., Marinoni, A., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Mihalopoulos, N., Pandolfi, M., Prats, N., Prenni, A. J., Putaud, J.-P., Ries, L., Reisen, F., Sellegri, K., Sharma, S., Sheridan, P., Sherman, J. P., Sun, J., Titos, G., Torres, E., Tuch, T., Weller, R., Wiedensohler, A., Zieger, P., and Laj, P.: Multidecadal time series of in-situ aerosol radiative properties from 52 stations around the world, ACTRIS Data Centre, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21336/c4dy-yw57" ext-link-type="DOI">10.21336/c4dy-yw57</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Conrad, V. and Pollak, L. W.: Methods in Climatology, Harvard University
Press, Boston, 1950.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crippa, P., Sullivan, R. C., Thota, A., and Pryor, S. C.: Evaluating the skill of high-resolution WRF-Chem simulations in describing drivers of aerosol direct climate forcing on the regional scale, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 397–416, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-397-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-397-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Davuliene, L., Sakalys, J., Dudoitis, V., Reklaite, A., and Ulevicius, V.:
Long-term black carbon variation in the South-Eastern Baltic Region in
2008–2015, Atmos. Poll. Res., 10, 123–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.06.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2018.06.013</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page8904?><ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>de Jong, R. and de Bruin, S.: Linear trends in seasonal vegetation time series and the modifiable temporal unit problem, Biogeosciences, 9, 71–77, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-71-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-71-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Denjean, C., Formenti, P., Desboeufs, K., Chevaillier, S., Triquet, S.,
Maille, M., Cazaunau, M, Laurent, B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Vallejo, P.,
Quinones, M., Gutierrez-Molina, I. E., Cassola, F., Prati, P., Andrews, E., and
Ogren, J.: Size distribution and optical properties of African mineral dust
after intercontinental transport, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 7117–7138,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024783" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD024783</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Marchand, N., and Doussin, J.-F.: Aethalometer multiple scattering correction Cref for mineral dust aerosols, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2923–2939, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2923-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-2923-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., King, M. D., Kaufman, Y. J., Eck,
T. F., and Slutsker, I.: Accuracy assessment of aerosol optical properties
retrieval from AERONET sun and sky radiance measurements, J. Geophys.
Res., 105, 9791–9806, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ealo, M., Alastuey, A., Pérez, N., Ripoll, A., Querol, X., and Pandolfi, M.: Impact of aerosol particle sources on optical properties in urban, regional and remote areas in the north-western Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1149–1169, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1149-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-1149-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>EMEP: EMEP Status Report 1/2019, Norwegian Meteorological Inst., ISSN 1504-6192, available at: <uri>https://emep.int/publ/reports/2019/EMEP_Status_Report_1_2019.pdf</uri> (last access: 21 July 2020), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Evan, A. T., Flamant, C., Gaetani, M., and Guichard, F.: The past, present and
future of African dust, Nature, 531, 493–495, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Zieger, P., Gysel, M., Kammermann, L., DeCarlo, P. F., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Measured and predicted aerosol light scattering enhancement factors at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2319–2333, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>García, M. I., van Drooge, B. L., Rodríguez, S., and Alastuey, A.: Speciation of organic aerosols in the Saharan Air Layer and in the free troposphere westerlies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8939–8958, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8939-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-8939-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gilbert, R. O.: Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring,
Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grange, S. K., Lötscher, H., Fischer, A., Emmenegger, L., and Hueglin, C.: Evaluation of equivalent black carbon source apportionment using observations from Switzerland between 2008 and 2018, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1867–1885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1867-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-1867-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hallar, A. G., Molotch, N. P., Hand, J. L., Livneh, B., McCubbin, I. B.,
Petersen, R., Michalsky, J., Lowenthal, D., and Kunkel, K. E.: Impacts of
increasing aridity and wildfires on aerosol loading in the intermountain
Western US, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 1–8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa510a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aa510a</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L., Schichtel, B. A., Malm, W. C., and Pitchford, M. L.: Particulate sulfate ion concentration and SO2 emission trends in the United States from the early 1990s through 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10353–10365, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10353-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10353-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L., Schichtel, B. A., Malm, W. C., Copeland, S., Molenar, J. V.,
Frank, N., and Pitchford, M.: Widespread reductions in haze across the
United States from the early 1990s through 2011, Atmos. Environ., 94,
671–679, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.062</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L., Gill, T. E., and Schichtel, B. A.: Spatial and seasonal
variability in fine mineral dust and coarse aerosol mass at remote sites
across the United States, J. Geophys. Res., 122,
3080–3097, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026290" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD026290</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L., Gill, T. E., and Schichtel, B. A.: Urban and rural coarse
aerosol mass across the United States: Spatial and seasonal variability and
long-term trends, Atmos. Environ., 218, 117025, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117025</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hervo, M.: Etude des propriétés optiques et radiatives des
aérosols en atmosphère réelle : Impact de l'hygroscopicité,
Sciences de la Terre, Université Blaise Pascal – Clermont-Ferrand II,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hirsch, R. M., Slack, J. R., and Smith, R. A.: Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data, Water Resour. Res., 18, 107–121, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanre, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer, A.,
Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F.,
Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET – A federated instrument network
and data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66,
1–16, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hsu, N. C., Gautam, R., Sayer, A. M., Bettenhausen, C., Li, C., Jeong, M. J., Tsay, S.-C., and Holben, B. N.: Global and regional trends of aerosol optical depth over land and ocean using SeaWiFS measurements from 1997 to 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8037–8053, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8037-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8037-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, G., Brook, R., Crippa, M., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Schieberle, C., Dore, C., Guizzardi, D., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., and Friedrich, R.: Speciation of anthropogenic emissions of non-methane volatile organic compounds: a global gridded data set for 1970–2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7683–7701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7683-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7683-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): IPCC First Assessment Report, edited by: Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., and Ephraums, J. J., WMO, Geneva,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policymakers,
IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, Final Draft, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Johnson, N. L.: Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of
translation, Biometrika, 36, 149–176, 1949.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kahn, R. A. and Gaitley, B. J.: An analysis of global aerosol type as retrieved
by MISR, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 4248–4281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023322" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023322</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kim, J.-H., Kim, S.-W., Ogren, J. A., Sheridan, P. J., Yoon, S.-C., Sharma, S.,
and Lin, N.-H.: Multiple scattering correction factor estimation for
aethalometer aerosol absorption coefficient measurement, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 53, 160–171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1555368" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2018.1555368</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kim, Y. P. and Lee, G.: Trend of air quality in Seoul: Policy and science,
Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 18, 2141–2156, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.03.0081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2018.03.0081</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kutzner, R. D., von Schneidemesser, E., Kuik, F., Quedenau, J., Weatherhead,
E. C., and Schmale, J.: Long-term monitoring of black carbon across Germany,
Atmos. Environ., 185, 41–52, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.039</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A., Cappa, C. D., Covert, D. S., Baynard, T., Massoli, P., Sierau,
B., Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Lovejoy, E. R., and Ravishankara, A. R.:
Bias in Filter-Based Aerosol Ligh<?pagebreak page8905?>t Absorption Measurements Due to Organic
Aerosol Loading: Evidence from Ambient Measurement, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42,
1033–1041, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laj, P., Bigi, A., Rose, C., Andrews, E., Lund Myhre, C., Collaud Coen, M., Wiedensohler, A., Schultz, M., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Gliß, J., Mortier, A., Pandolfi, M., Petäjä, T., Kim, S.-W., Aas, W., Putaud, J.-P., Mayol-Bracero, O., Keywood, M., Labrador, L., Aalto, P., Ahlberg, E., Alados Arboledas, L., Alastuey, A., Andrade, M., Artíñano, B., Ausmeel, S., Arsov, T., Asmi, E., Backman, J., Baltensperger, U., Bastian, S., Bath, O., Beukes, J. P., Brem, B. T., Bukowiecki, N., Conil, S., Couret, C., Day, D., Dayantolis, W., Degorska, A., Dos Santos, S. M., Eleftheriadis, K., Fetfatzis, P., Favez, O., Flentje, H., Gini, M. I., Gregorič, A., Gysel-Beer, M., Hallar, G. A., Hand, J., Hoffer, A., Hueglin, C., Hooda, R. K., Hyvärinen, A., Kalapov, I., Kalivitis, N., Kasper-Giebl, A., Kim, J. E., Kouvarakis, G., Kranjc, I., Krejci, R., Kulmala, M., Labuschagne, C., Lee, H.-J., Lihavainen, H., Lin, N.-H., Löschau, G., Luoma, K., Marinoni, A., Meinhardt, F., Merkel, M., Metzger, J.-M., Mihalopoulos, N., Nguyen, N. A., Ondracek, J., Peréz, N., Perrone, M. R., Petit, J.-E., Picard, D., Pichon, J.-M., Pont, V., Prats, N., Prenni, A., Reisen, F., Romano, S., Sellegri, K., Sharma, S., Schauer, G., Sheridan, P., Sherman, J. P., Schütze, M., Schwerin, A., Sohmer, R., Sorribas, M., Steinbacher, M., Sun, J., Titos, G., Tokzko, B., Tuch, T., Tulet, P., Tunved, P., Vakkari, V., Velarde, F., Velasquez, P., Villani, P., Vratolis, S., Wang, S.-H., Weinhold, K., Weller, R., Yela, M., Yus-Diez, J., Zdimal, V., Zieger, P., and Zikova, N.: A global analysis of climate-relevant aerosol properties retrieved from the network of GAW near-surface observatories, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-499" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2019-499</ext-link>, in review, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Landrigan, P. J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N. J. R., Adeyi, O., Arnold, R., Basu,
N., Baldé, A., Bertollini, R., Bose-O'Reilly, S., Boufford, J. I.,
Breysse, P. N., Chiles, T., Mahidol, C., Coll-Seck, A. M., Cropper, M. L.,
Fobil, J., Fuster, V., Greenstone, M., Haines, A., Hanrahan, D., Hunter, D.,
Khare, M., Krupnick, A., Lanphear, B., Lohani, B., Martin, K., Mathiasen,
K. V., McTeer, M. A., Murray, C. J. L., Ndahimananjara, J. D.,
Perera, F., Potočnik, J., Preker, A. S., Ramesh, J., Rockström, J.,
Salinas, C., Samson, L. D., Sanilya, K., Sly, P. D., Smith, K. R., Steiner, A.,
Stewart, R. B., Suk, W. A., van Schayck, O. C., Yadama, G. N., Yumkella, K., and
Zhong, M: The Lancet Commission on pollution and health, The Lancet, 391,
462–512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, C., Martin, R. V., Boys, B. L., van Donkelaar, A., and Ruzzante, S.: Evaluation and application of multi-decadal visibility data for trend analysis of atmospheric haze, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2435–2457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2435-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2435-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, C., Martin, R. V., Van Donkelaar, A., Boys, B. L., Hammer, M. S., Xu, J.
W., Marais, E. A., Reff, A., Strum, M., Ridley, D. A., Crippa, M., Brauer,
M., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in Chemical Composition of Global and Regional
Population-Weighted Fine Particulate Matter Estimated for 25 Years, Environ.
Sci. Tech., 51, 11185–11195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02530</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, J., Carlson, B. E., Dubovik, O., and Lacis, A. A.: Recent trends in aerosol optical properties derived from AERONET measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12271–12289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12271-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12271-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lihavainen, H., Asmi, E., Aaltonen, V., Makkonen, U., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Direct
radiative feedback due to biogenic secondary organic aerosol estimated from
boreal forest site observations, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 104005,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/104005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/104005</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lihavainen, H., Hyvärinen, A., Asmi, E., Hatakka, J., and Viisanen, Y.:
Long-term variability of aerosol optical properties in northern Finland,
Boreal Environ. Res., 20, 526–541, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lindau, R. and Venema, V. K. C.: The joint influence of break and noise variance on the break detection capability in time series homogenization, Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 4, 1–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-4-1-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ascmo-4-1-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, C., Chung, C. E., Zhang, F., and Yin, Y.: The colors of biomass burning
aerosols in the atmosphere, Sci. Rep., 6, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep28267</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Luoma, K., Virkkula, A., Aalto, P., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Over a 10-year record of aerosol optical properties at SMEAR II, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11363–11382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11363-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-11363-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lyamani, H., Olmo, F. J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Light scattering and
absorption properties of aerosol particles in the urban environment of
Granada, Spain, Atmos. Environ., 42, 2630–2642, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lyamani, H., Olmo, F. J., Foyo, I., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Black carbon
aerosols over an urban area in south-eastern Spain: changes detected after
the 2008 economic crisis, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6423–6432, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Malm, W. C., Sisler, J. F., Huffman, D., Eldred, R. A., and Cahill, T. A.: Spatial
and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the
United States, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 1347–1370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02916" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93JD02916</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Malm, W. C., Molenar, J. V., Eldred, R. A., and Sisler, J. F.: Examining the
relationship among atmospheric aerosols and light scattering and extinction
in the Grand Canyon area, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 19251–19265, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McClure, C. D. and Jaffe, D. A.: US particulate matter air quality improves
except in wildfire-prone areas, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 115, 7901–7906, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804353115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1804353115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mehta, M., Singh, R., Singh, A., Singh, N., and Ansumali: Recent global
aerosol optical depth variations and trends – A comparative study using
MODIS and MISR level 3 datasets, Remote Sens. Environ., 181, 137–150, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Molenar, J. V.: Analysis of the real world performance of the Optec NGN-2
ambient nephelometer, Visual Air Quality: Aerosols and Global Radiation
Balance, Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, 243–265, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moreira, F., Ascoli, D., Safford, H., Adams, M. A., Moreno, J. M., Pereira,
J. M. C., Catry, F. X., Armesto, J., Bond, W., Gonzalez, M., Koutsias, N.,
McCar, L., Price, O., Pausas, J. G., Rigolot, E., Stephens, S., Tavsanoglu,
C., Vallejo, V. R., van Wilgen, B. W., Xanthopoulos, G., and Fernandes, P. M.: Wildfire management in Mediterranean-type regions: paradigm change
needed, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 011001,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab541e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/ab541e</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mortier, A., Gliss, J., Schulz, M., Aas, W., Andrews, E., Bian, H., Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Hand, J., Holben, B., Hua, Z., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Laj, P., Lurton, T., Myhre, G., Neubauer, D., Olivié, D., von Salzen, K., Takemura, T., and Tilmes, S.<?pagebreak page8906?>: Evaluation of climate model aerosol trends with ground-based observations over the last two decades – an AeroCom and CMIP6 analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-1203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2019-1203</ext-link>, in review, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mudelsee, M.: Climate Time Series Analysis, Atmospheric and
Oceanographic Sciences Library, vol. 42, Springer, Heidelberg, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Müller, T., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Sheridan, P., Laborde, M.,
Covert, D. S., Marinoni, A., Imre, K., Henzing, B., Roger, J.-C., dos
Santos, S. M., Wilhelm, R., Wang, Y.-Q., and de Leeuw, G.: Angular
Illumination and Truncation of Three Different Integrating Nephelometers:
Implications for Empirical, Size-Based Corrections, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
43, 581–586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820902798484" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820902798484</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Müller, T., Henzing, J. S., de Leeuw, G., Wiedensohler, A., Alastuey, A., Angelov, H., Bizjak, M., Collaud Coen, M., Engström, J. E., Gruening, C., Hillamo, R., Hoffer, A., Imre, K., Ivanow, P., Jennings, G., Sun, J. Y., Kalivitis, N., Karlsson, H., Komppula, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Lunder, C., Marinoni, A., Martins dos Santos, S., Moerman, M., Nowak, A., Ogren, J. A., Petzold, A., Pichon, J. M., Rodriquez, S., Sharma, S., Sheridan, P. J., Teinilä, K., Tuch, T., Viana, M., Virkkula, A., Weingartner, E., Wilhelm, R., and Wang, Y. Q.: Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 245–268, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-245-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-245-2011</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Müller, T., Laborde, M., Kassell, G., and Wiedensohler, A.: Design and performance of a three-wavelength LED-based total scatter and backscatter integrating nephelometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1291–1303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nam, J., Kim, S. W., Park, R. J., Park, J. S., and Park, S. S.: Changes in
column aerosol optical depth and ground-level particulate matter
concentration over East Asia, Air Quality, Atmos. Health, 11,
49–60, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0517-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11869-017-0517-5</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nessler, R., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Effect of humidity on
aerosol light absorption and its implications for extinction and the single
scattering albedo illustrated for a site in the lower free troposphere, J.
Aerosol Sci., 36, 958–972, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.11.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.11.012</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ningombam, S. S., Larson, E. J. L., Dumka, U. C., Estellés, V.,
Campanelli, M., and Steve, C.: Long-term (1995–2018) aerosol optical depth
derived using ground based AERONET and SKYNET measurements from aerosol
aged-background sites, Atmos. Poll. Res., 10, 608–620, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.10.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2018.10.008</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ogren, J. A.: Comment on “Calibration and Intercomparison of Filter-Based
Measurements of Visible Light Absorption by Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
44, 589–591, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.482111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.482111</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ogren, J. A., Wendell, J., Andrews, E., and Sheridan, P. J.: Continuous light absorption photometer for long-term studies, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4805–4818, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4805-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-4805-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pandolfi, M., Alastuey, A., Pérez, N., Reche, C., Castro, I., Shatalov, V., and Querol, X.: Trends analysis of PM source contributions and chemical tracers in NE Spain during 2004–2014: a multi-exponential approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11787–11805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11787-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-11787-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pandolfi, M., Alados-Arboledas, L., Alastuey, A., Andrade, M., Angelov, C.,
Artiñano, B., Backman, J., Baltensperger, U., Bonasoni, P., Bukowiecki,
N., Collaud Coen, M., Conil, S., Coz, E., Crenn, V., Dudoitis, V., Ealo, M.,
Eleftheriadis, K., Favez, O., Fetfatzis, P., Fiebig, M., Flentje, H., Ginot,
P., Gysel, M., Henzing, B., Hoffer, A., Holubova Smejkalova, A., Kalapov,
I., Kalivitis, N., Kouvarakis, G., Kristensson, A., Kulmala, M., Lihavainen,
H., Lunder, C., Luoma, K., Lyamani, H., Marinoni, A., Mihalopoulos, N.,
Moerman, M., Nicolas, J., O'Dowd, C., Petäjä, T., Petit, J.-E.,
Pichon, J. M., Prokopciuk, N., Putaud, J.-P., Rodríguez, S., Sciare,
J., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Titos, G., Tuch, T., Tunved, P.,
Ulevicius, V., Vaishya, A., Vana, M., Virkkula, A., Vratolis, S.,
Weingartner, E., Wiedensohler, A., and Laj, P.: A European aerosol
phenomenology – 6: scattering properties of atmospheric aerosol particles
from 28 ACTRIS sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7877–7911,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7877-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7877-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Perry, K. D., Cahill, T. A., Schnell, R. C., and Harris, J. M.: Long-range
transport of anthropogenic aerosol to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration baseline station at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, J.
Geophys. Res., 104, 18521–18533, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Peterson, T. C., Easterling, D. R., Karl, T. R., Groisman, P., Nicholls, N.,
Plummer, N., Torok, S., Auer, I., Boehm, R., Gullett, D., Vincent, L.,
Heino, R., Tuomenvirta, H., Mestre, O., Szentimrey, T., Salinger, J.,
Forland, E., Hanssen-Bauer, I., Alexandersson, H., Jones, P., and Parker,
D.: Homogeneity Adjustments of in Situ Atmospheric Climate Data: a Review,
Int. J. Climatol., 18, 1493–1517, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prenni, A. J., Hand, J. L., Malm, W. C., Copeland, S., Luo, G., Yu, F.,
Taylor, N., Russell, L. M., and Schichtel, B. A.: An examination of the
algorithm for estimating light extinction from IMPROVE particle speciation
data, Atmos. Environ., 214, 116880, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116880</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ridley, D. A., Heald, C. L., and Prospero, J. M.: What controls the recent changes in African mineral dust aerosol across the Atlantic?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5735–5747, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5735-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5735-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rodríguez, S., Alastuey, A., Alonso-Pérez, S., Querol, X., Cuevas, E., Abreu-Afonso, J., Viana, M., Pérez, N., Pandolfi, M., and de la Rosa, J.: Transport of desert dust mixed with North African industrial pollutants in the subtropical Saharan Air Layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6663–6685, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6663-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6663-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmeisser, L., Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., Sheridan, P., Jefferson, A., Sharma, S., Kim, J. E., Sherman, J. P., Sorribas, M., Kalapov, I., Arsov, T., Angelov, C., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Labuschagne, C., Kim, S.-W., Hoffer, A., Lin, N.-H., Chia, H.-P., Bergin, M., Sun, J., Liu, P., and Wu, H.: Classifying aerosol type using in situ surface spectral aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12097–12120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12097-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-12097-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmeisser, L., Backman, J., Ogren, J. A., Andrews, E., Asmi, E., Starkweather, S., Uttal, T., Fiebig, M., Sharma, S., Eleftheriadis, K., Vratolis, S., Bergin, M., Tunved, P., and Jefferson, A.: Seasonality of aerosol optical properties in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11599–11622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11599-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11599-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page8907?><ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Holben, B. N.: Ångström exponent
and bimodal aerosol size distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D07207,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006328</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sellegri, K., Rose, C., Marinoni, A., Lupi, A., Wiedensohler, A., Andrade,
M., Bonasoni, P., and Laj, P.: New Particle Formation: A Review of
Ground-Based Observations at Mountain Research Stations, Atmosphere, 10, 493,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10090493" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos10090493</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sharma, S., Blagrave, K., Magnuson, J. J., O'Reilly, C. M., Oliver, S., Batt, R. D., Magee, M. R.,
Straile, D., Weyhenmeyer, G. A., Winslow, L., and Woolway, I. R.: Wide-spread loss of lake
ice around the Northern Hemisphere in a warmingworld, Nat. Clim. Change,
9, 227–231, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0393-5.5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-018-0393-5.5</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sheridan, P., Andrews, E., Schmeisser, L., Vasel, B., and Ogren, J.: Aerosol
measurements at South Pole: Climatology and impact of local contamination,
Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 16, 855–872, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0358" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0358</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sherman, J. P., Sheridan, P. J., Ogren, J. A., Andrews, E., Hageman, D., Schmeisser, L., Jefferson, A., and Sharma, S.: A multi-year study of lower tropospheric aerosol variability and systematic relationships from four North American regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12487–12517, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12487-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12487-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Singh, V., Ravindra, K., Sahu, L., and Sokhi, R.: Trends of atmospheric
black carbon concentration over United Kingdom, Atmos. Environ., 178,
148–157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.030</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sirois, A.: A brief and biased overview of time-series analysis of how to
find that evasive trend, WMO/EMEP Workshop on Advanced Statistical Methods
and Their Application to Air Quality Data Sets, Annex E., Global Atmosphere
Watch No. 133, TD- No. 956, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva,
Switzerland, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sogacheva, L., Popp, T., Sayer, A. M., Dubovik, O., Garay, M. J., Heckel, A., Hsu, N. C., Jethva, H., Kahn, R. A., Kolmonen, P., Kosmale, M., de Leeuw, G., Levy, R. C., Litvinov, P., Lyapustin, A., North, P., Torres, O., and Arola, A.: Merging regional and global aerosol optical depth records from major available satellite products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2031–2056, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2031-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-2031-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sorribas, M., Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., del Aguila, A., Fraile, R., Sheridan, P., and Yela, M.: Climatological study for understanding the aerosol
radiative effects at southwest Atlantic coast of Europe, Atmos. Environ., 205,
52–66, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.02.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.02.017</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tørseth, K., Aas, W., Breivik, K., Fjæraa, A. M., Fiebig, M.,
Hjellbrekke, A. G., Lund Myhre, C., Solberg, S., and Yttri, K. E.:
Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and
observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 5447–5481, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5447-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5447-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Turco, M., Rosa-Cánovas, J. J., Bedia, J., Jerez, S., Montávez, J. P.,
Llasat, M. C., and Provenzale, A.,: Exacerbated fires in Mediterranean Europe due
to anthropogenic warming projected with non-stationary climate-fire models,
Nat. Commun., 9, 3821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06358-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-06358-z</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vestreng, V., Myhre, G., Fagerli, H., Reis, S., and Tarrasón, L.: Twenty-five years of continuous sulphur dioxide emission reduction in Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3663–3681, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3663-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3663-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Virkkula, A.: Correction of the Calibration of the 3-wavelength Particle
Soot Absorption Photometer (3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M914" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> PSAP), Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44,
706–712, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.482110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.482110</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Virkkula, A., Ahlquist, N. C., Covert, D. S., Arnott, W. P., Sheridan, P.
J., Quinn, P. K., and Coffman, D. J.: Modification, calibration and a field
test of an instrument for measuring light absorption by particles, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 39, 68–83, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290901963" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868290901963</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Von Storch, H.: Misuses of statistical analysis in climate research, in:
Analysis of Climate Variability: Applications of Statistical Techniques, edited by: von Storch, H. and Navara, A., 11–26, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, R., Andrews, E., Balkanski, Y., Boucher, O., Myhre, G., Samset, B. H., Schulz, M., Schuster, G., Valari, M., and Tao, S., Representativeness error
in the ground-level observation networks for black carbon radiation
absorption, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2106–2114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076817" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL076817</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, W., Chen, Y., Becker, S., and Liu, B.: Linear trend detection in
serially dependent hydrometeorological data based on a variance correction
Spearman rho method, Water, 7, 7045–7065, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w7126673" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w7126673</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, X. L. and Swail, V. R.: Changes of extreme wave heights in Northern Hemisphere oceans and related atmospheric circulation regimes, J. Climate,
14, 2204–2221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Weatherhead, E. C., Reinsel, G. C., Tiao, G. C., Jackman, C. H., Bishop, L.,
Hollandsworth, F. S. M., DeLuisi, J., Keller, T., Oltmans, S. J., Flemming,
E. L., Wuebbles, D. J., Kerr, J. B., Miller, A. J., Herman, J., McPeters, R.,
Nagatani, R. M., and Frederick, J. E.: Detecting the recovery of total
column ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 22201–22210, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wei, J., Peng, Y., Mahmood, R., Sun, L., Guo, J.: Intercomparison in
spatial distributions and temporal trends derived from multi-source
satellite aerosol products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7183-7207,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7183-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7183-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>White, W. H., Trzepla, K., Hyslop, N. P., and Schichtel, B. A.: A critical
review of filter transmittance measurements for aerosol light absorption,
and de novo calibration for a decade of monitoring on PTFE membranes,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 50, 984–1002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1211615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2016.1211615</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Willis, M. D., Leaitch, W. R., and Abbatt, J. P.: Processes controlling the
composition and abundance of Arctic aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 56, 621–671,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000602" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018RG000602</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>WMO: WMO/GAW aerosol measurement procedures, guidelines, and recommendations, 2nd edn., World Meteorological Organization GAW Rep. 227, 93 pp., <uri>https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=3073</uri> (last access: 21 July 2020), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yoon, J., Pozzer, A., Chang, D. Y., Lelieveld, J., Kim, J., Kim, M., Lee,
Y. G., Koo, J.-H., Lee, J., and Moon, K. J.: Trend estimates of
AERONET-observed and model-simulated AOTs between 1993 and 2013, Atmos.
Environ., 125, 33–47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.058</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page8908?><ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yue, S., Pilon, P., Phinney, B., and Cavadias, G.: The influence of
autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological series,
Hydrol. Proc., 16, 1807–1829. <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.1095</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X. and Zwiers, F. W.: Comment on “Applicability of prewhitening to
eliminate the influence of serial correlation on the Mann–Kendall test” by
Sheng Yue and Chun Yuan Wang, Water Resour. Res., 40, W03805,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003WR002073</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Zwiers, F. W., and Li, G.: Monte Carlo experiments on the
detection of trends in extreme values, J. Climate, 17, 1945–1952,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, A., Bollasina, M. A., Crippa, M., and Stevenson, D. S.: Significant climate impacts of aerosol changes driven by growth in energy use and advances in emission control technology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 14517–14533, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14517-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-14517-2019</ext-link>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, B., Jiang, J. H., Gu, Y., Diner, D., Worden, J., Liou, K.-N., Su, H.,
Xing, J., Garay, M., and Huang, L.: Decadal-scale trends in regional aerosol
particle properties and their linkage to emission changes, Environ. Res.
Lett., 12, 054021, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cb2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cb2</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zieger, P., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering: results from different European sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10609–10631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Multidecadal trend analysis of in situ aerosol radiative properties around the world</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>In order to assess the evolution of aerosol parameters affecting climate
change, a long-term trend analysis of aerosol optical properties was
performed on time series from 52 stations situated across five continents.
The time series of measured scattering, backscattering and absorption
coefficients as well as the derived single scattering albedo, backscattering
fraction, scattering and absorption Ångström exponents covered at
least 10 years and up to 40 years for some stations. The non-parametric
seasonal Mann–Kendall (MK) statistical test associated with several
pre-whitening methods and with Sen's slope was used as the main trend analysis method. Comparisons with general least mean square associated with autoregressive bootstrap (GLS/ARB) and with standard least mean square analysis (LMS) enabled confirmation of the detected MK statistically
significant trends and the assessment of advantages and limitations of each
method. Currently, scattering and backscattering coefficient trends are
mostly decreasing in Europe and North America and are not statistically
significant in Asia, while polar stations exhibit a mix of increasing and
decreasing trends. A few increasing trends are also found at some stations
in North America and Australia. Absorption coefficient time series also
exhibit primarily decreasing trends. For single scattering albedo, 52&thinsp;% of
the sites exhibit statistically significant positive trends, mostly in Asia,
eastern/northern Europe and the Arctic, 22&thinsp;% of sites exhibit statistically significant negative trends, mostly in central Europe and central North
America, while the remaining 26&thinsp;% of sites have trends which are not statistically significant. In addition to evaluating trends for the overall
time series, the evolution of the trends in sequential 10-year segments was also analyzed. For scattering and backscattering, statistically significant
increasing 10-year trends are primarily found for earlier periods (10-year trends ending in 2010–2015) for polar stations and Mauna Loa. For most of
the stations, the present-day statistically significant decreasing 10-year trends of the single scattering albedo were preceded by not statistically
significant and statistically significant increasing 10-year trends. The effect of air pollution abatement policies in continental North America is
very obvious in the 10-year trends of the scattering coefficient – there is a shift to statistically significant negative trends in 2009–2012 for all
stations in the eastern and central USA. This long-term trend analysis of aerosol radiative properties with a broad spatial coverage provides insight
into potential aerosol effects on climate changes.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aas, W., Mortier, A., Bowersox, V., Cherian, R., Faluvegi, G., Fagerli, H.,
Hand, J., Klimont, Z., Galy-Lacaux, C., Lehmann, C. M. B., Lund Myhre, C.,
Oliviè, D., Sato, K., Quaas, J., Rao, P. S. P., Schulz, M., Shindell,
D., Skeie, R. B., Stein, A., Takemura, T., Tsyro, S., Vet, R., and Xu, X.:
Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur, Sci. Rep.,
9, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alfaro-Contreras, R., Zhang, J., Reid, J. S., and Christopher, S.: A study of 15-year aerosol optical thickness and direct shortwave aerosol radiative effect trends using MODIS, MISR, CALIOP and CERES, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13849–13868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13849-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13849-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Aliabadi, A. A., Staebler, R. M., and Sharma, S.: Air quality monitoring in communities of the Canadian Arctic during the high shipping season with a focus on local and marine pollution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2651–2673, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2651-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2651-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
AMAP Assessment 2015: Black carbon and ozone as Arctic climate forcers,
Oslo, Norway, Report No. 8279710922, available at: <a href="https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/amap-assessment-2015-black-carbon-and-ozone-as-arctic-climate-forcers/1299" target="_blank">https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/amap-assessment-2015-black-carbon-and-ozone-as-arctic-climate-forcers/1299</a> (last access: 21 July 2020), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L. and Ogren, J. A.: Determining aerosol radiative properties
using the TSI 3563 integrating nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 29, 57–69,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L., Masonis, S. J., Covert, D. S., Ahlquist, N. C., Howell, S.
G., Clarke, A. D., and McNaughton, C. S.: Variability of aerosol optical
properties derived from in situ aircraft measurements during ACE-Asia, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 8647, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003247" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003247</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., Kinne, S., and Samset, B.: Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6041–6072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6041-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6041-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, E., Sheridan, P., Ogren, J. A., Hageman, D., Jefferson, A., Wendell,
J., Alastuey, A., Alados-Arboledas, L., Bergin, M., Ealo, M., Hallar, A. G.,
Hoffer, A., Kalapov, I., Keywood, M., Kim, J., Kim, S.-W., Kolonjari, F.,
Labuschagne, C., Lin, N.-H., Macdonald, A., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., McCubbin, I. B., Pandolfi, M., Reisen, F., Sharma, S., Sherman, J. P., Sorribas, M.,
and Sun, J.: Overview of the NOAA/ESRL Federated Aerosol Network, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 100, 123–135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0175.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0175.1</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Asmi, A., Collaud Coen, M., Ogren, J. A., Andrews, E., Sheridan, P., Jefferson, A., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Bukowiecki, N., Lihavainen, H., Kivekäs, N., Asmi, E., Aalto, P. P., Kulmala, M., Wiedensohler, A., Birmili, W., Hamed, A., O'Dowd, C., Jennings, S. G., Weller, R., Flentje, H., Fjaeraa, A. M., Fiebig, M., Myhre, C. L., Hallar, A. G., Swietlicki, E., Kristensson, A., and Laj, P.: Aerosol decadal trends – Part 2: In-situ aerosol particle number concentrations at GAW and ACTRIS stations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 895–916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-895-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-895-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Backman, J., Schmeisser, L., Virkkula, A., Ogren, J. A., Asmi, E., Starkweather, S., Sharma, S., Eleftheriadis, K., Uttal, T., Jefferson, A., Bergin, M., Makshtas, A., Tunved, P., and Fiebig, M.: On Aethalometer measurement uncertainties and an instrument correction factor for the Arctic, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 5039–5062, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-5039-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-5039-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Banzhaf, S., Schaap, M., Kranenburg, R., Manders, A. M. M., Segers, A. J., Visschedijk, A. J. H., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Kuenen, J. J. P., van Meijgaard, E., van Ulft, L. H., Cofala, J., and Builtjes, P. J. H.: Dynamic model evaluation for secondary inorganic aerosol and its precursors over Europe between 1990 and 2009, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1047–1070, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1047-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1047-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bayazit, M. and Önöz, B.: To prewhiten or not to prewhiten in trend
analysis?, Hydro. Sci., 52, 611–624, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.3.669" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.3.669</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Beaulieu, C., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., and Seidou, O.: Synthèse des techniques d'homognénéisation des séries climatiques et analyse
d'applicabilité aux séries de précipitations, Hydro. Sci. J.,
52, 18–37, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Bernardoni, V., Ferrero, L., Soldan, F., Valentini, S., Massabo, D., Mocnik,
G., Gregoric, A., Cataldi, M., Bolzacchini, E., Prati, P., Valli, G., and
Vecchi, R.: Multi-wavelength aerosol absorption coefficient measurements:
instrument intercomparison and results of source and component modelling,
poster, European Aerosol Conference, Göteborg, Sweden, 25–30 September, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Blain, G. C.: The modified Mann–Kendall test: on the performance of three
variance correction approaches. Bragantia, 72, 416–425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1590/brag.2013.045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1590/brag.2013.045</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Bodhaine, B. A.: Aerosol absorption measurements at Barrow, Mauna Loa and
the South Pole, J. Geophys, Res.-Atmos., 100, 8967–8975.
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00513" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00513</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Bodhaine, B. A. and Dutton, E. G.: A long-term decrease in arctic haze at
Barrow, Alaska, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 947–950, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Anderson, T. L., and Campbell, D.: Calibration and
intercomparison of filter-based measurements of visible light absorption by
aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 30, 582–600, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868299304435" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868299304435</a>,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Bukowiecki, N., Weingartner, E., Gysel, M., Collaud Coen, M., Zieger, P.,
Herrmann, E., Steinbacher, M., Gäggeler, H. W., and Baltensperger, U.: A
review of more than 20 years of aerosol observation at the high altitude
research station Jungfraujoch, Switzerland (3580&thinsp;m&thinsp;asl), Aerosol Air Qual.
Res., 16, 764–788, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0305" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0305</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Burgos, M., Andrews, E., Titos, G., Alados-Arboledas, L., Baltensperger, U., Day, D., Jefferson, A., Kalivitis, N., Kouvarakis, G., Mihalopoulis, N.,
Sherman, J. P., Sun, J., Weingartner, E., and Zieger, P.: Data Descriptor: A global view on the effect of water uptake on aerosol particle light
scattering, Sci. Data, 6, 157,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s1597-019-0158-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s1597-019-0158-7</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Butt, E. W., Turnock, S. T., Rigby, R., Reddington, C. L., Yoshioka, M.,
Johnson, J. S., Regayre, L. A., Pringle, K. J., Mann, G. W., and Spracklen,
D. V.: Global and regional trends in particulate air pollution and
attributable health burden over the past 50 years, Environ. Res. Lett.,
12, 104017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa87be" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa87be</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, M., Lim, H., Kim, J., Lee, S., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Garay, M. J., Hyer, E. J., Saide, P. E., and Liu, H.: Validation, comparison, and integration of GOCI, AHI, MODIS, MISR, and VIIRS aerosol optical depth over East Asia during the 2016 KORUS-AQ campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 4619–4641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4619-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4619-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Ciarelli, G., Theobald, M. R., Vivanco, M. G., Beekmann, M., Aas, W., Andersson, C., Bergström, R., Manders-Groot, A., Couvidat, F., Mircea, M., Tsyro, S., Fagerli, H., Mar, K., Raffort, V., Roustan, Y., Pay, M.-T., Schaap, M., Kranenburg, R., Adani, M., Briganti, G., Cappelletti, A., D'Isidoro, M., Cuvelier, C., Cholakian, A., Bessagnet, B., Wind, P., and Colette, A.: Trends of inorganic and organic aerosols and precursor gases in Europe: insights from the EURODELTA multi-model experiment over the 1990–2010 period, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4923–4954, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4923-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4923-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Nyeki, S., Cozic, J., Henning, S.,
Verheggen, B., Gehrig, R., and Baltensperger, U.: Long-term trend analysis
of aerosol variables at the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D13213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007995" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007995</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G., Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Collaud Coen, M., Andrews, E., Asmi, A., Baltensperger, U., Bukowiecki, N., Day, D., Fiebig, M., Fjaeraa, A. M., Flentje, H., Hyvärinen, A., Jefferson, A., Jennings, S. G., Kouvarakis, G., Lihavainen, H., Lund Myhre, C., Malm, W. C., Mihapopoulos, N., Molenar, J. V., O'Dowd, C., Ogren, J. A., Schichtel, B. A., Sheridan, P., Virkkula, A., Weingartner, E., Weller, R., and Laj, P.: Aerosol decadal trends – Part 1: In-situ optical measurements at GAW and IMPROVE stations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 869–894, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-869-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-869-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Collaud Coen, M., Andrews, E., Aliaga, D., Andrade, M., Angelov, H., Bukowiecki, N., Ealo, M., Fialho, P., Flentje, H., Hallar, A. G., Hooda, R., Kalapov, I., Krejci, R., Lin, N.-H., Marinoni, A., Ming, J., Nguyen, N. A., Pandolfi, M., Pont, V., Ries, L., Rodríguez, S., Schauer, G., Sellegri, K., Sharma, S., Sun, J., Tunved, P., Velasquez, P., and Ruffieux, D.: Identification of topographic features influencing aerosol observations at high altitude stations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12289–12313, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12289-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12289-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Collaud Coen, M., Andrews, E., Bigi, A., Romanens, G., Martucci, G., and Vuilleumier, L.: Effects of the prewhitening method, the time granularity and the time segmentation on the Mann–Kendall trend detection and the associated Sen's slope, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-178" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-178</a>, in review, 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Collaud Coen, M., Andrews, E., Alastuey, A., Arsov, T. P., Backman, J., Brem, B. T., Bukowiecki, N., Couret, C., Eleftheriadis, K., Flentje, H., Fiebig, M., Gysel-Beer, M., Hand, J. L., Hoffer, A., Hooda, R., Hueglin, C., Joubert, W., Keywood, M., Kim, J. E., Kim, S.-W., Labuschagne, C., Lin, N.-H., Lin, Y., Lund Myhre, C., Luoma, K., Lyamani, H., Marinoni, A., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Mihalopoulos, N., Pandolfi, M., Prats, N., Prenni, A. J., Putaud, J.-P., Ries, L., Reisen, F., Sellegri, K., Sharma, S., Sheridan, P., Sherman, J. P., Sun, J., Titos, G., Torres, E., Tuch, T., Weller, R., Wiedensohler, A., Zieger, P., and Laj, P.: Multidecadal time series of in-situ aerosol radiative properties from 52 stations around the world, ACTRIS Data Centre, <a href="https://doi.org/10.21336/c4dy-yw57" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21336/c4dy-yw57</a>, 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Conrad, V. and Pollak, L. W.: Methods in Climatology, Harvard University
Press, Boston, 1950.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Crippa, P., Sullivan, R. C., Thota, A., and Pryor, S. C.: Evaluating the skill of high-resolution WRF-Chem simulations in describing drivers of aerosol direct climate forcing on the regional scale, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 397–416, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-397-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-397-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Davuliene, L., Sakalys, J., Dudoitis, V., Reklaite, A., and Ulevicius, V.:
Long-term black carbon variation in the South-Eastern Baltic Region in
2008–2015, Atmos. Poll. Res., 10, 123–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.06.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.06.013</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
de Jong, R. and de Bruin, S.: Linear trends in seasonal vegetation time series and the modifiable temporal unit problem, Biogeosciences, 9, 71–77, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-71-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-71-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Denjean, C., Formenti, P., Desboeufs, K., Chevaillier, S., Triquet, S.,
Maille, M., Cazaunau, M, Laurent, B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Vallejo, P.,
Quinones, M., Gutierrez-Molina, I. E., Cassola, F., Prati, P., Andrews, E., and
Ogren, J.: Size distribution and optical properties of African mineral dust
after intercontinental transport, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 7117–7138,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024783" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024783</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Marchand, N., and Doussin, J.-F.: Aethalometer multiple scattering correction Cref for mineral dust aerosols, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2923–2939, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2923-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2923-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., King, M. D., Kaufman, Y. J., Eck,
T. F., and Slutsker, I.: Accuracy assessment of aerosol optical properties
retrieval from AERONET sun and sky radiance measurements, J. Geophys.
Res., 105, 9791–9806, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ealo, M., Alastuey, A., Pérez, N., Ripoll, A., Querol, X., and Pandolfi, M.: Impact of aerosol particle sources on optical properties in urban, regional and remote areas in the north-western Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1149–1169, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1149-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1149-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
EMEP: EMEP Status Report 1/2019, Norwegian Meteorological Inst., ISSN 1504-6192, available at: <a href="https://emep.int/publ/reports/2019/EMEP_Status_Report_1_2019.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 21 July 2020), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Evan, A. T., Flamant, C., Gaetani, M., and Guichard, F.: The past, present and
future of African dust, Nature, 531, 493–495, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Zieger, P., Gysel, M., Kammermann, L., DeCarlo, P. F., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Measured and predicted aerosol light scattering enhancement factors at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2319–2333, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
García, M. I., van Drooge, B. L., Rodríguez, S., and Alastuey, A.: Speciation of organic aerosols in the Saharan Air Layer and in the free troposphere westerlies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8939–8958, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8939-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8939-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Gilbert, R. O.: Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring,
Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Grange, S. K., Lötscher, H., Fischer, A., Emmenegger, L., and Hueglin, C.: Evaluation of equivalent black carbon source apportionment using observations from Switzerland between 2008 and 2018, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1867–1885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1867-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1867-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Hallar, A. G., Molotch, N. P., Hand, J. L., Livneh, B., McCubbin, I. B.,
Petersen, R., Michalsky, J., Lowenthal, D., and Kunkel, K. E.: Impacts of
increasing aridity and wildfires on aerosol loading in the intermountain
Western US, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 1–8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa510a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa510a</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Hand, J. L., Schichtel, B. A., Malm, W. C., and Pitchford, M. L.: Particulate sulfate ion concentration and SO2 emission trends in the United States from the early 1990s through 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10353–10365, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10353-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10353-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Hand, J. L., Schichtel, B. A., Malm, W. C., Copeland, S., Molenar, J. V.,
Frank, N., and Pitchford, M.: Widespread reductions in haze across the
United States from the early 1990s through 2011, Atmos. Environ., 94,
671–679, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.062</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Hand, J. L., Gill, T. E., and Schichtel, B. A.: Spatial and seasonal
variability in fine mineral dust and coarse aerosol mass at remote sites
across the United States, J. Geophys. Res., 122,
3080–3097, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026290" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026290</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Hand, J. L., Gill, T. E., and Schichtel, B. A.: Urban and rural coarse
aerosol mass across the United States: Spatial and seasonal variability and
long-term trends, Atmos. Environ., 218, 117025, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117025</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Hervo, M.: Etude des propriétés optiques et radiatives des
aérosols en atmosphère réelle : Impact de l'hygroscopicité,
Sciences de la Terre, Université Blaise Pascal – Clermont-Ferrand II,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Hirsch, R. M., Slack, J. R., and Smith, R. A.: Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data, Water Resour. Res., 18, 107–121, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanre, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer, A.,
Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F.,
Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET – A federated instrument network
and data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66,
1–16, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Hsu, N. C., Gautam, R., Sayer, A. M., Bettenhausen, C., Li, C., Jeong, M. J., Tsay, S.-C., and Holben, B. N.: Global and regional trends of aerosol optical depth over land and ocean using SeaWiFS measurements from 1997 to 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8037–8053, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8037-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8037-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, G., Brook, R., Crippa, M., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Schieberle, C., Dore, C., Guizzardi, D., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., and Friedrich, R.: Speciation of anthropogenic emissions of non-methane volatile organic compounds: a global gridded data set for 1970–2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7683–7701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7683-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7683-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): IPCC First Assessment Report, edited by: Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., and Ephraums, J. J., WMO, Geneva,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policymakers,
IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, Final Draft, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, N. L.: Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of
translation, Biometrika, 36, 149–176, 1949.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Kahn, R. A. and Gaitley, B. J.: An analysis of global aerosol type as retrieved
by MISR, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 4248–4281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023322" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023322</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, J.-H., Kim, S.-W., Ogren, J. A., Sheridan, P. J., Yoon, S.-C., Sharma, S.,
and Lin, N.-H.: Multiple scattering correction factor estimation for
aethalometer aerosol absorption coefficient measurement, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 53, 160–171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1555368" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1555368</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, Y. P. and Lee, G.: Trend of air quality in Seoul: Policy and science,
Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 18, 2141–2156, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.03.0081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.03.0081</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Kutzner, R. D., von Schneidemesser, E., Kuik, F., Quedenau, J., Weatherhead,
E. C., and Schmale, J.: Long-term monitoring of black carbon across Germany,
Atmos. Environ., 185, 41–52, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.039</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A., Cappa, C. D., Covert, D. S., Baynard, T., Massoli, P., Sierau,
B., Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Lovejoy, E. R., and Ravishankara, A. R.:
Bias in Filter-Based Aerosol Light Absorption Measurements Due to Organic
Aerosol Loading: Evidence from Ambient Measurement, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42,
1033–1041, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Laj, P., Bigi, A., Rose, C., Andrews, E., Lund Myhre, C., Collaud Coen, M., Wiedensohler, A., Schultz, M., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Gliß, J., Mortier, A., Pandolfi, M., Petäjä, T., Kim, S.-W., Aas, W., Putaud, J.-P., Mayol-Bracero, O., Keywood, M., Labrador, L., Aalto, P., Ahlberg, E., Alados Arboledas, L., Alastuey, A., Andrade, M., Artíñano, B., Ausmeel, S., Arsov, T., Asmi, E., Backman, J., Baltensperger, U., Bastian, S., Bath, O., Beukes, J. P., Brem, B. T., Bukowiecki, N., Conil, S., Couret, C., Day, D., Dayantolis, W., Degorska, A., Dos Santos, S. M., Eleftheriadis, K., Fetfatzis, P., Favez, O., Flentje, H., Gini, M. I., Gregorič, A., Gysel-Beer, M., Hallar, G. A., Hand, J., Hoffer, A., Hueglin, C., Hooda, R. K., Hyvärinen, A., Kalapov, I., Kalivitis, N., Kasper-Giebl, A., Kim, J. E., Kouvarakis, G., Kranjc, I., Krejci, R., Kulmala, M., Labuschagne, C., Lee, H.-J., Lihavainen, H., Lin, N.-H., Löschau, G., Luoma, K., Marinoni, A., Meinhardt, F., Merkel, M., Metzger, J.-M., Mihalopoulos, N., Nguyen, N. A., Ondracek, J., Peréz, N., Perrone, M. R., Petit, J.-E., Picard, D., Pichon, J.-M., Pont, V., Prats, N., Prenni, A., Reisen, F., Romano, S., Sellegri, K., Sharma, S., Schauer, G., Sheridan, P., Sherman, J. P., Schütze, M., Schwerin, A., Sohmer, R., Sorribas, M., Steinbacher, M., Sun, J., Titos, G., Tokzko, B., Tuch, T., Tulet, P., Tunved, P., Vakkari, V., Velarde, F., Velasquez, P., Villani, P., Vratolis, S., Wang, S.-H., Weinhold, K., Weller, R., Yela, M., Yus-Diez, J., Zdimal, V., Zieger, P., and Zikova, N.: A global analysis of climate-relevant aerosol properties retrieved from the network of GAW near-surface observatories, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-499" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-499</a>, in review, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Landrigan, P. J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N. J. R., Adeyi, O., Arnold, R., Basu,
N., Baldé, A., Bertollini, R., Bose-O'Reilly, S., Boufford, J. I.,
Breysse, P. N., Chiles, T., Mahidol, C., Coll-Seck, A. M., Cropper, M. L.,
Fobil, J., Fuster, V., Greenstone, M., Haines, A., Hanrahan, D., Hunter, D.,
Khare, M., Krupnick, A., Lanphear, B., Lohani, B., Martin, K., Mathiasen,
K. V., McTeer, M. A., Murray, C. J. L., Ndahimananjara, J. D.,
Perera, F., Potočnik, J., Preker, A. S., Ramesh, J., Rockström, J.,
Salinas, C., Samson, L. D., Sanilya, K., Sly, P. D., Smith, K. R., Steiner, A.,
Stewart, R. B., Suk, W. A., van Schayck, O. C., Yadama, G. N., Yumkella, K., and
Zhong, M: The Lancet Commission on pollution and health, The Lancet, 391,
462–512, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Martin, R. V., Boys, B. L., van Donkelaar, A., and Ruzzante, S.: Evaluation and application of multi-decadal visibility data for trend analysis of atmospheric haze, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2435–2457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2435-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2435-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Martin, R. V., Van Donkelaar, A., Boys, B. L., Hammer, M. S., Xu, J.
W., Marais, E. A., Reff, A., Strum, M., Ridley, D. A., Crippa, M., Brauer,
M., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in Chemical Composition of Global and Regional
Population-Weighted Fine Particulate Matter Estimated for 25 Years, Environ.
Sci. Tech., 51, 11185–11195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02530" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02530</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Carlson, B. E., Dubovik, O., and Lacis, A. A.: Recent trends in aerosol optical properties derived from AERONET measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12271–12289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12271-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12271-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Lihavainen, H., Asmi, E., Aaltonen, V., Makkonen, U., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Direct
radiative feedback due to biogenic secondary organic aerosol estimated from
boreal forest site observations, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 104005,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/104005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/104005</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Lihavainen, H., Hyvärinen, A., Asmi, E., Hatakka, J., and Viisanen, Y.:
Long-term variability of aerosol optical properties in northern Finland,
Boreal Environ. Res., 20, 526–541, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Lindau, R. and Venema, V. K. C.: The joint influence of break and noise variance on the break detection capability in time series homogenization, Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 4, 1–18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-4-1-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-4-1-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, C., Chung, C. E., Zhang, F., and Yin, Y.: The colors of biomass burning
aerosols in the atmosphere, Sci. Rep., 6, 1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28267" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28267</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Luoma, K., Virkkula, A., Aalto, P., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Over a 10-year record of aerosol optical properties at SMEAR II, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11363–11382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11363-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11363-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Lyamani, H., Olmo, F. J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Light scattering and
absorption properties of aerosol particles in the urban environment of
Granada, Spain, Atmos. Environ., 42, 2630–2642, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Lyamani, H., Olmo, F. J., Foyo, I., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Black carbon
aerosols over an urban area in south-eastern Spain: changes detected after
the 2008 economic crisis, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6423–6432, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Malm, W. C., Sisler, J. F., Huffman, D., Eldred, R. A., and Cahill, T. A.: Spatial
and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the
United States, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 1347–1370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02916" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02916</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Malm, W. C., Molenar, J. V., Eldred, R. A., and Sisler, J. F.: Examining the
relationship among atmospheric aerosols and light scattering and extinction
in the Grand Canyon area, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 19251–19265, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
McClure, C. D. and Jaffe, D. A.: US particulate matter air quality improves
except in wildfire-prone areas, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 115, 7901–7906, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804353115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804353115</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Mehta, M., Singh, R., Singh, A., Singh, N., and Ansumali: Recent global
aerosol optical depth variations and trends – A comparative study using
MODIS and MISR level 3 datasets, Remote Sens. Environ., 181, 137–150, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Molenar, J. V.: Analysis of the real world performance of the Optec NGN-2
ambient nephelometer, Visual Air Quality: Aerosols and Global Radiation
Balance, Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, 243–265, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Moreira, F., Ascoli, D., Safford, H., Adams, M. A., Moreno, J. M., Pereira,
J. M. C., Catry, F. X., Armesto, J., Bond, W., Gonzalez, M., Koutsias, N.,
McCar, L., Price, O., Pausas, J. G., Rigolot, E., Stephens, S., Tavsanoglu,
C., Vallejo, V. R., van Wilgen, B. W., Xanthopoulos, G., and Fernandes, P. M.: Wildfire management in Mediterranean-type regions: paradigm change
needed, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 011001,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab541e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab541e</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Mortier, A., Gliss, J., Schulz, M., Aas, W., Andrews, E., Bian, H., Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Hand, J., Holben, B., Hua, Z., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Laj, P., Lurton, T., Myhre, G., Neubauer, D., Olivié, D., von Salzen, K., Takemura, T., and Tilmes, S.: Evaluation of climate model aerosol trends with ground-based observations over the last two decades – an AeroCom and CMIP6 analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-1203" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-1203</a>, in review, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Mudelsee, M.: Climate Time Series Analysis, Atmospheric and
Oceanographic Sciences Library, vol. 42, Springer, Heidelberg, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, T., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Sheridan, P., Laborde, M.,
Covert, D. S., Marinoni, A., Imre, K., Henzing, B., Roger, J.-C., dos
Santos, S. M., Wilhelm, R., Wang, Y.-Q., and de Leeuw, G.: Angular
Illumination and Truncation of Three Different Integrating Nephelometers:
Implications for Empirical, Size-Based Corrections, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
43, 581–586, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820902798484" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820902798484</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, T., Henzing, J. S., de Leeuw, G., Wiedensohler, A., Alastuey, A., Angelov, H., Bizjak, M., Collaud Coen, M., Engström, J. E., Gruening, C., Hillamo, R., Hoffer, A., Imre, K., Ivanow, P., Jennings, G., Sun, J. Y., Kalivitis, N., Karlsson, H., Komppula, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Lunder, C., Marinoni, A., Martins dos Santos, S., Moerman, M., Nowak, A., Ogren, J. A., Petzold, A., Pichon, J. M., Rodriquez, S., Sharma, S., Sheridan, P. J., Teinilä, K., Tuch, T., Viana, M., Virkkula, A., Weingartner, E., Wilhelm, R., and Wang, Y. Q.: Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 245–268, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-245-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-245-2011</a>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, T., Laborde, M., Kassell, G., and Wiedensohler, A.: Design and performance of a three-wavelength LED-based total scatter and backscatter integrating nephelometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1291–1303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011</a>, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Nam, J., Kim, S. W., Park, R. J., Park, J. S., and Park, S. S.: Changes in
column aerosol optical depth and ground-level particulate matter
concentration over East Asia, Air Quality, Atmos. Health, 11,
49–60, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0517-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0517-5</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Nessler, R., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Effect of humidity on
aerosol light absorption and its implications for extinction and the single
scattering albedo illustrated for a site in the lower free troposphere, J.
Aerosol Sci., 36, 958–972, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.11.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.11.012</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Ningombam, S. S., Larson, E. J. L., Dumka, U. C., Estellés, V.,
Campanelli, M., and Steve, C.: Long-term (1995–2018) aerosol optical depth
derived using ground based AERONET and SKYNET measurements from aerosol
aged-background sites, Atmos. Poll. Res., 10, 608–620, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.10.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.10.008</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Ogren, J. A.: Comment on “Calibration and Intercomparison of Filter-Based
Measurements of Visible Light Absorption by Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
44, 589–591, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.482111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.482111</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Ogren, J. A., Wendell, J., Andrews, E., and Sheridan, P. J.: Continuous light absorption photometer for long-term studies, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4805–4818, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4805-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4805-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Pandolfi, M., Alastuey, A., Pérez, N., Reche, C., Castro, I., Shatalov, V., and Querol, X.: Trends analysis of PM source contributions and chemical tracers in NE Spain during 2004–2014: a multi-exponential approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11787–11805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11787-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11787-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Pandolfi, M., Alados-Arboledas, L., Alastuey, A., Andrade, M., Angelov, C.,
Artiñano, B., Backman, J., Baltensperger, U., Bonasoni, P., Bukowiecki,
N., Collaud Coen, M., Conil, S., Coz, E., Crenn, V., Dudoitis, V., Ealo, M.,
Eleftheriadis, K., Favez, O., Fetfatzis, P., Fiebig, M., Flentje, H., Ginot,
P., Gysel, M., Henzing, B., Hoffer, A., Holubova Smejkalova, A., Kalapov,
I., Kalivitis, N., Kouvarakis, G., Kristensson, A., Kulmala, M., Lihavainen,
H., Lunder, C., Luoma, K., Lyamani, H., Marinoni, A., Mihalopoulos, N.,
Moerman, M., Nicolas, J., O'Dowd, C., Petäjä, T., Petit, J.-E.,
Pichon, J. M., Prokopciuk, N., Putaud, J.-P., Rodríguez, S., Sciare,
J., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Titos, G., Tuch, T., Tunved, P.,
Ulevicius, V., Vaishya, A., Vana, M., Virkkula, A., Vratolis, S.,
Weingartner, E., Wiedensohler, A., and Laj, P.: A European aerosol
phenomenology – 6: scattering properties of atmospheric aerosol particles
from 28 ACTRIS sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7877–7911,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7877-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7877-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Perry, K. D., Cahill, T. A., Schnell, R. C., and Harris, J. M.: Long-range
transport of anthropogenic aerosol to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration baseline station at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, J.
Geophys. Res., 104, 18521–18533, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Peterson, T. C., Easterling, D. R., Karl, T. R., Groisman, P., Nicholls, N.,
Plummer, N., Torok, S., Auer, I., Boehm, R., Gullett, D., Vincent, L.,
Heino, R., Tuomenvirta, H., Mestre, O., Szentimrey, T., Salinger, J.,
Forland, E., Hanssen-Bauer, I., Alexandersson, H., Jones, P., and Parker,
D.: Homogeneity Adjustments of in Situ Atmospheric Climate Data: a Review,
Int. J. Climatol., 18, 1493–1517, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Prenni, A. J., Hand, J. L., Malm, W. C., Copeland, S., Luo, G., Yu, F.,
Taylor, N., Russell, L. M., and Schichtel, B. A.: An examination of the
algorithm for estimating light extinction from IMPROVE particle speciation
data, Atmos. Environ., 214, 116880, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116880</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Ridley, D. A., Heald, C. L., and Prospero, J. M.: What controls the recent changes in African mineral dust aerosol across the Atlantic?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5735–5747, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5735-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5735-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Rodríguez, S., Alastuey, A., Alonso-Pérez, S., Querol, X., Cuevas, E., Abreu-Afonso, J., Viana, M., Pérez, N., Pandolfi, M., and de la Rosa, J.: Transport of desert dust mixed with North African industrial pollutants in the subtropical Saharan Air Layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6663–6685, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6663-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6663-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Schmeisser, L., Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., Sheridan, P., Jefferson, A., Sharma, S., Kim, J. E., Sherman, J. P., Sorribas, M., Kalapov, I., Arsov, T., Angelov, C., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Labuschagne, C., Kim, S.-W., Hoffer, A., Lin, N.-H., Chia, H.-P., Bergin, M., Sun, J., Liu, P., and Wu, H.: Classifying aerosol type using in situ surface spectral aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12097–12120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12097-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12097-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Schmeisser, L., Backman, J., Ogren, J. A., Andrews, E., Asmi, E., Starkweather, S., Uttal, T., Fiebig, M., Sharma, S., Eleftheriadis, K., Vratolis, S., Bergin, M., Tunved, P., and Jefferson, A.: Seasonality of aerosol optical properties in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11599–11622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11599-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11599-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Holben, B. N.: Ångström exponent
and bimodal aerosol size distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D07207,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Sellegri, K., Rose, C., Marinoni, A., Lupi, A., Wiedensohler, A., Andrade,
M., Bonasoni, P., and Laj, P.: New Particle Formation: A Review of
Ground-Based Observations at Mountain Research Stations, Atmosphere, 10, 493,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10090493" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10090493</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Sharma, S., Blagrave, K., Magnuson, J. J., O'Reilly, C. M., Oliver, S., Batt, R. D., Magee, M. R.,
Straile, D., Weyhenmeyer, G. A., Winslow, L., and Woolway, I. R.: Wide-spread loss of lake
ice around the Northern Hemisphere in a warmingworld, Nat. Clim. Change,
9, 227–231, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0393-5.5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0393-5.5</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Sheridan, P., Andrews, E., Schmeisser, L., Vasel, B., and Ogren, J.: Aerosol
measurements at South Pole: Climatology and impact of local contamination,
Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 16, 855–872, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0358" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0358</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Sherman, J. P., Sheridan, P. J., Ogren, J. A., Andrews, E., Hageman, D., Schmeisser, L., Jefferson, A., and Sharma, S.: A multi-year study of lower tropospheric aerosol variability and systematic relationships from four North American regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12487–12517, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12487-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12487-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Singh, V., Ravindra, K., Sahu, L., and Sokhi, R.: Trends of atmospheric
black carbon concentration over United Kingdom, Atmos. Environ., 178,
148–157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.030</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Sirois, A.: A brief and biased overview of time-series analysis of how to
find that evasive trend, WMO/EMEP Workshop on Advanced Statistical Methods
and Their Application to Air Quality Data Sets, Annex E., Global Atmosphere
Watch No. 133, TD- No. 956, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva,
Switzerland, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Sogacheva, L., Popp, T., Sayer, A. M., Dubovik, O., Garay, M. J., Heckel, A., Hsu, N. C., Jethva, H., Kahn, R. A., Kolmonen, P., Kosmale, M., de Leeuw, G., Levy, R. C., Litvinov, P., Lyapustin, A., North, P., Torres, O., and Arola, A.: Merging regional and global aerosol optical depth records from major available satellite products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2031–2056, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2031-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2031-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Sorribas, M., Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., del Aguila, A., Fraile, R., Sheridan, P., and Yela, M.: Climatological study for understanding the aerosol
radiative effects at southwest Atlantic coast of Europe, Atmos. Environ., 205,
52–66, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.02.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.02.017</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Tørseth, K., Aas, W., Breivik, K., Fjæraa, A. M., Fiebig, M.,
Hjellbrekke, A. G., Lund Myhre, C., Solberg, S., and Yttri, K. E.:
Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and
observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 5447–5481, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5447-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5447-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Turco, M., Rosa-Cánovas, J. J., Bedia, J., Jerez, S., Montávez, J. P.,
Llasat, M. C., and Provenzale, A.,: Exacerbated fires in Mediterranean Europe due
to anthropogenic warming projected with non-stationary climate-fire models,
Nat. Commun., 9, 3821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06358-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06358-z</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Vestreng, V., Myhre, G., Fagerli, H., Reis, S., and Tarrasón, L.: Twenty-five years of continuous sulphur dioxide emission reduction in Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3663–3681, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3663-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3663-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Virkkula, A.: Correction of the Calibration of the 3-wavelength Particle
Soot Absorption Photometer (3<i>λ</i> PSAP), Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44,
706–712, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.482110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.482110</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Virkkula, A., Ahlquist, N. C., Covert, D. S., Arnott, W. P., Sheridan, P.
J., Quinn, P. K., and Coffman, D. J.: Modification, calibration and a field
test of an instrument for measuring light absorption by particles, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 39, 68–83, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290901963" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290901963</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Von Storch, H.: Misuses of statistical analysis in climate research, in:
Analysis of Climate Variability: Applications of Statistical Techniques, edited by: von Storch, H. and Navara, A., 11–26, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, R., Andrews, E., Balkanski, Y., Boucher, O., Myhre, G., Samset, B. H., Schulz, M., Schuster, G., Valari, M., and Tao, S., Representativeness error
in the ground-level observation networks for black carbon radiation
absorption, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2106–2114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076817" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076817</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, W., Chen, Y., Becker, S., and Liu, B.: Linear trend detection in
serially dependent hydrometeorological data based on a variance correction
Spearman rho method, Water, 7, 7045–7065, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w7126673" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w7126673</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X. L. and Swail, V. R.: Changes of extreme wave heights in Northern Hemisphere oceans and related atmospheric circulation regimes, J. Climate,
14, 2204–2221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014</a>,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Weatherhead, E. C., Reinsel, G. C., Tiao, G. C., Jackman, C. H., Bishop, L.,
Hollandsworth, F. S. M., DeLuisi, J., Keller, T., Oltmans, S. J., Flemming,
E. L., Wuebbles, D. J., Kerr, J. B., Miller, A. J., Herman, J., McPeters, R.,
Nagatani, R. M., and Frederick, J. E.: Detecting the recovery of total
column ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 22201–22210, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, J., Peng, Y., Mahmood, R., Sun, L., Guo, J.: Intercomparison in
spatial distributions and temporal trends derived from multi-source
satellite aerosol products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7183-7207,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7183-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7183-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
White, W. H., Trzepla, K., Hyslop, N. P., and Schichtel, B. A.: A critical
review of filter transmittance measurements for aerosol light absorption,
and de novo calibration for a decade of monitoring on PTFE membranes,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 50, 984–1002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1211615" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1211615</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
Willis, M. D., Leaitch, W. R., and Abbatt, J. P.: Processes controlling the
composition and abundance of Arctic aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 56, 621–671,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000602" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000602</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
WMO: WMO/GAW aerosol measurement procedures, guidelines, and recommendations, 2nd edn., World Meteorological Organization GAW Rep. 227, 93 pp., <a href="https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=3073" target="_blank"/> (last access: 21 July 2020), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Yoon, J., Pozzer, A., Chang, D. Y., Lelieveld, J., Kim, J., Kim, M., Lee,
Y. G., Koo, J.-H., Lee, J., and Moon, K. J.: Trend estimates of
AERONET-observed and model-simulated AOTs between 1993 and 2013, Atmos.
Environ., 125, 33–47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.058</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
Yue, S., Pilon, P., Phinney, B., and Cavadias, G.: The influence of
autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological series,
Hydrol. Proc., 16, 1807–1829. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1095</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X. and Zwiers, F. W.: Comment on “Applicability of prewhitening to
eliminate the influence of serial correlation on the Mann–Kendall test” by
Sheng Yue and Chun Yuan Wang, Water Resour. Res., 40, W03805,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002073</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Zwiers, F. W., and Li, G.: Monte Carlo experiments on the
detection of trends in extreme values, J. Climate, 17, 1945–1952,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, A., Bollasina, M. A., Crippa, M., and Stevenson, D. S.: Significant climate impacts of aerosol changes driven by growth in energy use and advances in emission control technology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 14517–14533, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14517-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14517-2019</a>, 2019.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, B., Jiang, J. H., Gu, Y., Diner, D., Worden, J., Liou, K.-N., Su, H.,
Xing, J., Garay, M., and Huang, L.: Decadal-scale trends in regional aerosol
particle properties and their linkage to emission changes, Environ. Res.
Lett., 12, 054021, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cb2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cb2</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>
Zieger, P., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering: results from different European sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10609–10631, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
