<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-20-7291-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Impacts of water partitioning and polarity of organic compounds <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> on secondary organic aerosol over eastern China</article-title><alt-title>Impacts of water partitioning and polarity of organic compounds on secondary organic aerosol</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Impacts of water partitioning and polarity of organic compounds on secondary organic aerosol}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.~Li et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jingyi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9763-500X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Haowen</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Ying</surname><given-names>Qi</given-names></name>
          <email>qying@civil.tamu.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff1">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Zhijun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yanli</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0614-2096</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff6 aff7">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Xinming</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-0928</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Xinghua</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Yele</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2354-0221</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff1">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Min</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-9123</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yuanhang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Jianlin</given-names></name>
          <email>jianlinhu@nuist.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and
Equipment Technology, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Nanjing University of Information Science &amp; Technology, Nanjing 210044, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and
Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing
University of Information Science &amp; Technology, Nanjing 210044, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas
A &amp; M University, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> College Station, Texas 77843-3136, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking
University, Beijing 100871, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key
Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou
Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment,
Institute of Urban Environment, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>School of Space &amp; Environment, Beihang University, Beijing
100191, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and
Atmospheric Chemistry, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Qi Ying (qying@civil.tamu.edu) and Jianlin Hu (jianlinhu@nuist.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>24</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>7291</fpage><lpage>7306</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>23</day><month>January</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>April</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>May</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e239">Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) is an important component of fine particular matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Most air quality models use an equilibrium partitioning method along with the saturation vapor pressure (SVP) of semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) to predict SOA formation. However, the models typically assume that the organic particulate matter (OPM) is an ideal mixture and ignore the partitioning of water vapor to OPM. In this study, the Community Multiscale Air Quality model (CMAQ) is updated to investigate the impacts of water vapor partitioning and nonideality of the
organic–water mixture on SOA formation during winter (January) and summer
(July) of 2013 over eastern China. The updated model treats the partitioning of water vapor molecules into OPM and uses the universal functional activity coefficient (UNIFAC) model to estimate the activity coefficients of species in the organic–water mixture. The modified model can generally capture the observed surface organic carbon (OC) with a correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.7 and the surface organic aerosol (OA) with the mean fractional bias (MFB) and mean fractional error (MFE) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.54, respectively. SOA concentration shows significant seasonal and spatial variations, with high concentrations in the North China Plain (NCP), central China, and the Sichuan Basin (SCB) regions during winter (up to 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) during summer (up to 16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). In winter, SOA decreases slightly in the updated model, with a monthly averaged relative change of 10 %–20 % in the highly concentrated areas, mainly due to organic–water interactions. The monthly averaged concentration of SOA increases greatly in summer, by 20 %–50 % at the surface and 30 %–60 % in the whole column. The increase in SOA is mainly due
to the increase in biogenic SOA in inland areas and anthropogenic SOA in
coastal areas. As a result, the averaged aerosol optical depth (AOD) is
increased<?pagebreak page7292?> by up to 10 %, and the cooling effect of aerosol radiative
forcing (ARF) is enhanced by up to 15 % over the YRD in summer. The aerosol
liquid water content associated with OPM (ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the surface is relatively high in inland areas in winter and over the ocean in summer, with a monthly averaged concentration of 0.5–3.0 and 5–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The hygroscopicity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of OA based on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–Köhler theory is determined using the modeled ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio varies significantly across
different cities and seasons. Analysis of two representative cities, Jinan
(in the NCP) and Nanjing (in the YRD), shows that the impacts of water partitioning
and nonideality of the organic–water mixture on SOA are sensitive to
temperature, relative humidity (RH), and the SVP of SVOCs. The two processes exhibit opposite impacts on SOA in eastern China. Water uptake increases SOA by up to 80 % in the organic phase, while including nonunity activity coefficients decreases SOA by up to 50 %. Our results indicate that both water partitioning into OPM and the activity coefficients of the condensed organics should be considered in simulating SOA formation from gas–particle partitioning, especially in hot and humid environments.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e390">Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) is formed via a complex interaction of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with oxidants and primary particles
emitted from anthropogenic and biogenic sources in the atmosphere. As an
important component of fine particular matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), SOA can cause
severe air pollution in urban and suburban areas (Huang et al., 2014) and exhibits adverse health effects (Atkinson et al., 2014). SOA also plays an important role in new particle formation and particle growth that further contribute to the enhancement of cloud condensation nuclei (CCNs; Wiedensohler et al., 2009; Ehn et al., 2014). This will, in turn, impact the atmospheric aerosol burden, precipitation and water circulation, solar radiation budget, and climate (Ramanathan et al., 2001). However, the extents of those influences are not well understood so far due to the high uncertainties associated with the formation as well as the physical and chemical properties of SOA (Shrivastava et al., 2017). Large gaps still exist in
SOA mass loading and properties between models and observations (Gentner
et al., 2017; Ervens et al., 2011; Hayes et al., 2015). Therefore, it is
crucial to explore and resolve this issue to improve our knowledge of the
roles of SOA in the environment, human health, and climate.</p>
      <p id="d1e402">Gas–particle partitioning of semivolatile and low-volatile organic
compounds (SVOCs and LVOCs) generated from VOC oxidation is an important
pathway of SOA formation. In most current chemical transport models (CTMs),
this process is treated as an equilibrium partitioning process that depends
on the mass concentration of the organic particulate matter (OPM), ambient
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), the mean molecular weight of the OPM, and the volatility of
condensed organics (Pankow, 1994). The formation of condensed organic products is commonly represented by lumped surrogate SVOCs in a two-product model with volatilities and SVOC yields fitted to chamber experiments (Odum et al., 1996). To better represent the volatility of primary organic aerosol (POA) and the multigeneration oxidation of SVOCs to a wider range, Donahue et al. (2006) proposed the volatility basis set (VBS) model, in which the mass yields of SVOCs are fitted to a fixed number of volatility bins (usually 0.01–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The VBS model has been adopted by several CTMs (WRF-Chem, GEOS-Chem, etc.).</p>
      <p id="d1e441">Although the models can capture the general trend of SOA evolution and mass
concentration to some extent (J. Li et al., 2017; Bergström et al.,
2012; Woody et al., 2016), two key factors currently neglected in models may
lead to biases: (1) the molecular structures and interactions of functional
groups (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>COOH, etc.) of condensed organics (nonideality) and (2) partitioning of water vapor, the most abundant atmospheric constituent besides <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to OPM. Nonideality alters the volatility of condensed organics and thus their contributions to the total SOA mass loading (Cappa et al., 2008). Water partitioning into OPM can reduce the partial pressure of organics due to the effect of Raoult's law (Prisle et al., 2010) and lead to increases in SOA mass.
The amount of aerosol liquid water associated with organics (ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) may vary for different precursors (Healy et al., 2009; Prisle et al., 2010). The above two aspects will not only affect the chemical composition of SOA but also the inorganic portion (Ansari and Pandis, 2000) and optical properties (Denjean et al., 2015) of aerosols.</p>
      <p id="d1e504">Laboratory and field studies have observed water absorbed by SOA from a
variety of precursor VOCs (Lambe et al., 2011; D. F. Zhao et al., 2016;
Asa-Awuku et al., 2010; Varutbangkul et al., 2006). The hygroscopicity of
SOA, quantitatively described by the hygroscopicity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
correlated with the oxygen-to-carbon ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and increases with more oxidized SOA during photochemical aging (Lambe et al., 2011; D. F. Zhao et al., 2016). The OPM-associated water can be estimated using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–Köhler theory under the Zdanovskii–Stokes–Robinson (ZSR) assumption of no interactions between any constituents in aerosols (Petters
and Kreidenweis, 2007). The total water content is the summation of water associated with each solute at the same water activity. Guo et al. (2015) found that this simplified method, along with the ISORROPIA model, which is used to predict aerosol liquid water (ALW) associated with the inorganic portion of aerosols, could reproduce the observed total ALW in the ambient environment. Pye et al. (2017) found that the modeled organic aerosol (OA) improved significantly but biased high at nighttime when ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is included in the calculation. However, as the interaction among organic species and between organics and water in the organic–water mixture has been shown to play an important role in SOA<?pagebreak page7293?> formation and water partitioning to OPM (Kim et al., 2019), the ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–Köhler theory and its impact on SOA might not be accurate. Using the universal functional activity coefficient (UNIFAC) method (Fredenslund et al., 1975) for calculating activity coefficients of the organic–water mixture, it was found that in the eastern US, where biogenic SOA dominated the OA, considering ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to a significant increase in predicted SOA (Pankow et al., 2015; Jathar et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e569">China has been suffering from severe PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution especially in the
eastern region, with fast urbanization and economic development (Fu and Chen, 2017). SOA is a very significant component of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in China, contributing about 20 %–50 % (Y. J. Li et al., 2017). The fraction of SOA in OA increases during haze events (Huang et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2019). Previous modeling studies in China indicate that SOA was underpredicted (Lin et al., 2016; Jiang et al., 2012), and the impacts of nonideality and water–OPM partitioning on modeled SOA have not been evaluated.</p>
      <p id="d1e590">In this study, regional simulations of SOA during January and July of 2013
over eastern China were conducted to investigate the seasonal variation in
SOA due to water partitioning into OPM. The model performance was evaluated
against observed meteorological parameters (temperature and relative
humidity, RH) as well as PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, organic carbon (OC), and OA at ground
monitoring sites. The regional and seasonal impacts on SOA, ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and properties of aerosols were quantified. Lastly, influences of the results by several factors including meteorological parameters, estimations of saturation vapor pressures (SVP) of condensed organics, and the individual impacts of ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and nonideality of the organic–water mixture on SOA prediction were analyzed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e635">The Community Multiscale Air Quality model (CMAQ v5.0.1), coupled with a
modified SAPRC-11, was used in this study. Model configurations were largely
based on that used by Hu et al. (2016) as summarized below. Firstly, SAPRC-11 was expanded for a more detailed treatment of isoprene oxidation and for tracking dicarbonyl products (glyoxal and methylglyoxal) from different groups of major precursors (Ying et al., 2015). Secondly, SOA from isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX), methacrylic acid epoxide (MAE), and dicarbonyls through surface-controlled irreversible reactive uptake was added (Hu et al., 2017; Li et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2020; Ying et al., 2015). Thirdly, the heterogeneous formation of secondary nitrate and sulfate from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions on the particle surfaces (Ying et al., 2014) was added, which is an important source of secondary inorganic aerosol (Zheng et al., 2015) and improves model estimates of nitrate and sulfate (Qiao et al., 2018; Shi et al., 2017). Fourthly, SOA yields were corrected for vapor wall loss (Zhang et al., 2014). Impacts of the above updates on model performances have been extensively discussed in the cited work and are not further investigated in the current study.</p>
      <p id="d1e660">The SOA module mostly follows Pankow et al. (2015). Two types of SOA as traditionally treated in CMAQ were considered: the “semivolatile” (SV) portion that formed via equilibrium absorption partitioning of SVOCs and the “nonvolatile” (NV) portion that includes the oligomers and SOA formed via direct oxidation of aromatics at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. SOA from dicarbonyls, IEPOX, and MAE was formed by irreversible reactive uptake and categorized as NV SOA in the current model as well. Some studies investigated SOA from glyoxal, methylglyoxal, and IEPOX using detailed reactions and reversible pathways in models or observed as reversible processes in chamber experiments, leading to a relatively lower SOA yield compared to the surface-controlled irreversible uptake (Lim et al., 2013; Knote et al., 2014; Galloway et al., 2009; El-Sayed et al., 2018; Budisulistiorini et al., 2017). The nonvolatile assumption used in this paper allows an upper-limit estimation of the importance of these additional SOA formation pathways. POA was treated as nonvolatile and nonreactive. The mass distribution of SVOCs between the gas phase and particle phase follows the equation
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M43" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the gas–particle partitioning constant for compound <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the concentration of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the particle phase, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the concentration of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the gas phase, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the total mass concentration of the absorbing organic phase (i.e., OPM). The gas–particle partitioning constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is dependent on the chemical composition of the OPM. Pankow (1994) derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SVOCs partitioning into an absorbing organic phase as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M62" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MW</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (atm) is the SVP of the pure compound <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (K), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the activity coefficient of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the absorbing organic phase, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MW</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the average molecular weight of the OPM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (8.314 J mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the gas constant, and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is used to convert the units to cubic meters per microgram.</p>
      <p id="d1e1071">There are 12 lumped SVOCs generated by oxidation of alkanes, alkenes, and
aromatics under different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions and 8 NV organic products as listed in Tables S1 and S2 in the Supplement. More details about the lumped precursors such as formation conditions (“high” and “low” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), lumping species and method, and yields from parent VOCs can be found in Carlton et al. (2010) and are summarized in<?pagebreak page7294?> the Supplement. Activity coefficients of SVOCs were calculated based on the composition of the OPM using the UNIFAC method, with carbon number (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), functional groups, and energy interaction parameters assigned to both SV and NV compounds (Pankow et al., 2015). The UNIFAC model is one of the most commonly used models with which activity coefficients of condensed organics and their interactions with water can be estimated. This method has been adopted to investigate the impacts of nonideality and water partitioning into OPM on SOA for different precursors in box models (Seinfeld et al., 2001; Bowman and Melton, 2004) and CTMs (Pankow et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2019). In the current model, POA was assumed to have a bulk composition of 10 categories of surrogate species (Table S3), as used by Li et al. (2015). POA is also involved in the calculation of activity coefficients for the organic–water mixture. Detailed information about the surrogate species, including their structures and properties, can be found in Li et al. (2015) and references therein.</p>
      <p id="d1e1107">In addition to organic compounds, water partitioning into OPM is enabled
according to Eqs. (1) and (2). In such a case, the absorbing phase in Eq. (1)
includes both organic aerosol and water associated with OPM. As water condenses in the absorbing organic phase, it will further alter the molar
fraction of each composition, the activity coefficient of SVOCs, and the SV SOA mass concentrations as a result. In the current model, we assumed no
interactions between the inorganic and organic phases.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Estimating the hygroscopicity of OA</title>
      <p id="d1e1118">Based on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–Köhler theory with linearly additive hygroscopic
behavior of each component of the mixed particle, ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is related to the hygroscopicity parameter for the organic mixture (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) by Eq. (3) (Petters and Kreidenweis, 2007):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M80" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALW</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the density of water (assumed to be 1 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume concentration of organics, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the water activity (assumed to be the same as RH). Since ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study is calculated mechanistically using the partitioning theory, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be estimated by rearranging Eq. (3):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALW</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be estimated from the modeled mass concentration of OA, assuming the density of OA to be 1.2 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Li et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e1340">In many studies, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed to increase linearly with the oxidation state of OA, expressed as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (Massoli et al., 2010; Duplissy et al., 2011; Lambe et al., 2011). The correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in nine representative cities was evaluated during January and July of 2013 with the reduced major axis regression method (Ayers, 2001). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio was calculated using Eq. (5):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the molar fraction and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of organic aerosol component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. For POA, a fixed molar fraction and composition were assumed following Li et al. (2015). For SOA, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio was calculated by using the ratio of organic matter to organic carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) following Simon and Bhave (2012):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M102" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of each SOA component follows Pankow et al. (2015) as shown in Tables S1 and S2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Model application</title>
      <p id="d1e1587">The simulation domain has a horizontal resolution of 36 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 36 km (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grids) and a vertical structure of 18 layers up to 21 km, which covers eastern China as shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement. Anthropogenic emissions were generated from the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC; Zhang et al., 2009) v1.0 at a resolution of 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<uri>http://www.meicmodel.org</uri>, last access: 1 March 2019) for China and from the Regional Emission inventory in ASia version 2 (REAS2; Kurokawa et al., 2013) at a resolution of 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<uri>http://www.nies.go.jp/REAS/</uri>, last access: 1 March 2019) for the rest of the domain. Biogenic emissions were generated by the Model for Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN) v2.1, with the leaf area index (LAI) from the 8 d Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) LAI product (MOD15A2) and the plant function types (PFTs) from the Global Community Land Model (CLM 3.0). Open biomass burning emissions were generated from the Fire INventory from the National Center for Atmospheric Research (FINN; Wiedinmyer et al., 2011). Dust and sea salt emissions were generated online during CMAQ simulations. The total emissions of major SOA precursors and their spatial distributions are shown in Table S4 and Fig. S2. Meteorological fields were generated using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model v3.6.1 with initial and boundary conditions from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Final (NCEP FNL) Operational Model Global Tropospheric Analyses dataset. More details about the model application can be found in Hu et al. (2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e1666">Four scenarios are investigated in this study. The base case (BC) applies
the default secondary organic aerosol module of CMAQ v5.0.1. In this case,
no water partitioning into OPM is considered. Lumped semivolatile products
from the oxidation of various precursors partition into a single organic
phase, which is considered as an ideal mixture of POA and SOA with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The water case (C1)<?pagebreak page7295?> includes water partitioning into OPM, which is again considered as an ideal solution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>1 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The UNIFAC case (C2) considers the interaction between organic constituents with UNIFAC-calculated activity coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but does not allow water partitioning into OPM. The combined case (C3) allows both water partitioning and interactions between all constituents (including water and organics) using UNIFAC-calculated activity coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The results of the BC and C3 are used to examine the overall impacts of water partitioning into OPM and polarity of organics on SOA and ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown in Sect. 3.1–3.4. The separate influences of those two processes on SOA from C1 and C2 are discussed in Sect. 3.5.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Model evaluation</title>
      <p id="d1e1800">The meteorological inputs and emissions have been used in several previous
publications. Model performance on meteorological parameters (temperature
and RH), gaseous species, and gas and aerosol concentrations have been
extensively evaluated (Hu et al., 2016, 2017; Qiao et al., 2018; Shi et al., 2017). A summary of the model performance related to this study is provided below. Observed meteorological data were obtained from the National Climatic Data Center (<uri>ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/noaa</uri>, last access: 15 February 2019). Observations of OC at two urban locations, Beijing (Cao et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015) and Guangzhou (Lai et al., 2016), and of OA in Beijing (Sun et al., 2013) during January of 2013 as well as surface
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations from the China
National Environmental Monitoring Center (<uri>http://113.108.142.147:20035/emcpublish/</uri>, last access: 10 May 2015) at several monitoring sites during July of 2013 were used to evaluate model estimates of aerosols. Details of measurement methodology and uncertainties of observations are listed in the corresponding references.</p>
      <p id="d1e1818">Temperature and RH are the two meteorological factors that affect SOA
formation. Table 1 lists model statistics of mean observation (OBS), mean
prediction (PRE), mean bias (MB), gross error (GE), and correlation
coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on WRF and observations at monitoring sites located in eight subregions of the domain (Fig. S1) during January and July of 2013. The
benchmarks for the MM5 model (another meteorology model) of 4–12 km
horizontal resolution suggested by Emery et al. (2001) are also listed in the table. Details of monitoring sites in the eight subregions are listed in Table S5. Overall, WRF tends to underestimate both temperature and RH. The model shows better agreement with observed temperature as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is higher than that of RH. Both temperature and RH are well captured by the model in the YRD, the Pearl River Delta (PRD), and the central regions of China (the major regions of eastern China). In these regions, MB and GE of temperature are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.7 and 1.8–2.6 K, respectively, which are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–5.6 % and 9.2 %–16.8 % for RH, respectively.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" orientation="landscape"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1858">Statistical analysis of modeled temperature (K) and relative
humidity (%) of January and July of 2013 at the monitoring sites in different geographical areas as shown in Fig. S1. The cities are listed in Table S5.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.87}[.87]?><oasis:tgroup cols="26">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="17" colname="col17" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="18" colname="col18" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="19" colname="col19" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="20" colname="col20" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="21" colname="col21" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="22" colname="col22" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="23" colname="col23" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="24" colname="col24" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="25" colname="col25" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="26" colname="col26" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">Northeast<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">NCP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col9" nameend="col10" align="center">Northwest<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col12" nameend="col13" align="center">YRD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col15" nameend="col16" align="center">Central<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col18" nameend="col19" align="center">SCB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col21" nameend="col22" align="center">PRD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col23"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col24" nameend="col25" align="center">Southwest<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col26">Benchmark<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Jul</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Jan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Jul</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Jan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Jul</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Jan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">Jul</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">Jan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">Jul</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">Jan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">Jul</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">Jan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">Jul</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col23"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col24">Jan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col25">Jul</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col26"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OBS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">256.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">296.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">263.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">297.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">266.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">293.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">277.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">303.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">275.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">301.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">276.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">295.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">289.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">301.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col23"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col24">282.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col25">295.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col26"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PRE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">251.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">296.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">261.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">298.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">267.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">293.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">278.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">302.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">276.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">301.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">273.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">293.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">288.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">300.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col23"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col24">278.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col25">291.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col26"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col23"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col24"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col25"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col26"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">5.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col23"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col24">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col25">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col26"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col23"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col24">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col25">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col26"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relative</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OBS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">77.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">74.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">72.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">60.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">69.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">79.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">71.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">76.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">71.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">68.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">74.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">77.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">80.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col23"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col24">70.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col25">77.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col26"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">humidity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PRE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">85.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">78.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">57.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">49.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">54.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">75.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">76.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">64.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">70.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">57.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">78.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">75.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">84.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col23"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col24">75.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col25">85.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col26"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">5.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col23"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col24">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col25">7.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col26"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">19.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">19.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">11.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">11.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">16.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">11.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">22.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">11.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">9.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">9.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col23"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col24">15.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col25">10.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col26"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col23"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col24">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col25">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col26"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.87}[.87]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1861"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{1mm}}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> OBS is mean observation, PRE is mean prediction, MB is mean bias, GE is gross error, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the correlation coefficient of predictions vs. observations. MB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
GE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the prediction and observation data, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of data. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Northeast is northeastern China, NCP is the North China Plain, northwest is northwestern China, YRD is the Yangtze River Delta, central is central China, SCB is the Sichuan Basin, PRD is the Pearl River Delta, and southwest is southwestern China. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Benchmarks of MB and GE are for the MM5 model of 4–12 km horizontal resolution by Emery et al. (2001).</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3303">Model estimates of daily organic carbon (OC) from case C3 are compared with
measurements at monitoring sites in Beijing and Guangzhou in January of 2013
(Fig. 1a). The factors used to convert SOA to OC (SOC) are listed in Tables S1 and S2. OC from POA (POC) is directly predicted by the model. Generally, the ratio between modeled and observed OC concentration falls in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.7. The model tends to underestimate OC on high-concentration days. Overall, the mean fractional bias (MFB) and mean fractional error (MFE) of OC are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.27, which are within the criteria (MFB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6; MFE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75) suggested by the EPA (2007). The bias in OC might be due to underestimated POA emissions and underpredicted SOA in CMAQ from missing precursors (Hu et al., 2017; B. Zhao et al., 2016). No significant differences in OC are observed in C3 compared to BC (not shown), likely due to the low-biased SOA predicted in the current model that limits the impact of ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on SOA formation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3376">Comparison of <bold>(a)</bold> observed and modeled organic carbon
concentration at the University of Beihang (BH), Tsinghua University (TH), and
Guangzhou (GZ); <bold>(b)</bold> observed organic aerosol (Obs-OA) at Beijing and
predictions of total OA (pOA) and SOA (pSOA; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The locations of the monitoring sites are shown in Fig. S1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/7291/2020/acp-20-7291-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page7296?><p id="d1e3411">The underestimation of SOA can be seen from Fig. 1b as well. CMAQ can well
capture the observed diurnal variation in OA in Beijing during wintertime
except for the underestimates of peak values. The correlation coefficient of
modeled to observed OA is 0.55. We find a 25 % underestimate of OA on
average. Better agreement between the model and observations is shown on
nonpolluted days (daily averaged concentration less than 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The MFB and MFE of polluted days are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.64, respectively, which are worse than those of nonpolluted days (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for MFB and 0.52 for MFE). The overall MFB and MFE of OA during January are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.54, respectively, which are within the criteria (MFB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6; MFE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75) suggested by the EPA (2007). Again, no apparent changes in SOA or OA are observed between case C3 and BC (not shown) since POA is predicted to be the primary contributor to OA in Beijing in winter in the current model, with an averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 0.12. This ratio is much lower than the field observation of about 0.45–1.94 (Zhao et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2013, 2016). The bias might be due to the missing SOA converted by partitioning and aging of semivolatile POA as well as oxidation from intermediate volatile organic compounds (IVOCs) and VOC oxidation products. Those pathways are shown to be important for SOA formation by modeling, field, and chamber studies (Hodzic et al., 2010; Jimenez et al., 2009; Murphy et al., 2017; Robinson et al., 2007;
Shrivastava et al., 2008; Tkacik et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2014; B. Zhao et
al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e3494">A sensitivity test was performed by using the newest CMAQ model version 5.3.1, which includes all the above processes in the aerosol module. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in Beijing is improved greatly in winter, at 0.83. However, high uncertainties still exist in the emissions of the involved precursors and characterization of SOA formation through these processes, requiring further constraints by observations. Their influences on SOA due to water partitioning into OPM and nonideality of the organic–water mixture will be evaluated in a future study.</p>
      <p id="d1e3509">Due to the lack of observed OC and OA in July of 2013, model performances are evaluated by comparing predicted and observed PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at ground sites (Fig. S1) as an alternative, as shown in Fig. S3. Generally, the
model can well reproduce the diurnal variation in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in most regions. Predicted PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on highly concentrated days is biased low, especially in the North China Plain (NCP). The NCP has the highest PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranging from 60 to 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The bias in modeled PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is significant in cities in the northwest. This might be due to missing dust emissions in the current inventory (Hu et al., 2016). To further evaluate the model performance, the averaged MFB and MFE of modeled PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are plotted against observations of each site as shown in Fig. S4. The criteria of MFB and MFE followed recommendations by Boylan and Russell (2006). Our model performs well since most of the predictions meet the criteria, and a large fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) meets the goal. The averaged MFB and MFE across all the sites are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.39, respectively, indicating slight underestimation of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by the model.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3619">Monthly averaged SOA from C3 and changes in SOA due to water
partitioning into OPM and nonideality of the organic–water mixture. “Abs. Diff.” represents absolute differences (C3–BC); “Rel. Diff.” represents relative differences ((C3–BC)/BC; %).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/7291/2020/acp-20-7291-2020-f02.png"/>

          <?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{4mm}}?>
        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Impacts on SOA and ALW${}_{\mathrm{org}}$}?><title>Impacts on SOA and ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e3647">The spatial distribution of SOA varies greatly in the two seasons. In winter, SOA are relatively high in the eastern SCB and the central and eastern provinces of Shandong, Henan, Anhui, and Hubei (Figs. 2 and S5). Monthly averaged<?pagebreak page7297?> SOA concentrations in the above areas are up to 25 and 15–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Anthropogenic emissions such as dicarbonyl products from the oxidation of xylene and toluene (Hu et al., 2017) are the major sources of SOA (Fig. S6). In summer, surface SOA is high in the northeast, the NCP, and the YRD. The highest SOA occurs in Shanghai and Jiangsu provinces as well as the coastal area of the Yellow Sea, with values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the surface and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–25 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the column (col-SOA) of the atmosphere below 21 km (Fig. S5). In contrast to winter SOA, a significant fraction of summer SOA originates from biogenic emissions (Fig. S7). Anthropogenic SOA is highly concentrated in the coastal areas of the Yellow Sea and Bohai Bay.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3725">Monthly averaged water partitioning into the organic phase
(ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the ratio to SOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALW</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during January and July of 2013.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/7291/2020/acp-20-7291-2020-f03.png"/>

          <?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{4mm}}?>
        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3783">The correlation of hygroscopicity of organic aerosol (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in nine representative cities – Shenyang (SS), Beijing (BJ), Jinan (JN), Zhengzhou (ZZ), Xi'an (XA), Nanjing (NJ), Shanghai (SH), Chengdu (CD), and Guangzhou (GZ) – in January <bold>(a)</bold> and July <bold>(b)</bold> of 2013. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios are categorized into 10 bins. In each bin, the ranges of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are represented by bars. The mean values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are represented by triangles colored by the averaged RH of each bin. The relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is fitted by a linear function with reduced major-axis regression (blue lines) and an exponential function (red lines), respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">01</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">07</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the fitted correlation for January and July, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/7291/2020/acp-20-7291-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page7298?><p id="d1e3926">The combined effects of water partitioning into OPM and nonideality on SOA
formation also exhibit strong seasonal variation. In winter, SOA is slightly
decreased by 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (10 %–20 %) on average at the surface (Fig. 2) and less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (20 %) in the column (Fig. S5) over high-SOA regions where anthropogenic sources dominate. We show later that the decrease in SOA is mainly due to the large activity coefficients of SVOCs, which decrease <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In summer, higher
temperature and RH promote water partitioning and SOA formation so that SOA
apparently increases over the entire domain, with the highest enhancement of
2–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (20 %–50 %) at the surface (Fig. 2) and 4–6 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (30 %–60 %) in the column (Fig. S5) over the YRD and the coastal area of the Yellow Sea. Anthropogenic SOA dominates the total change in winter as shown in Fig. S6. In summer, the increase in SOA is attributed to biogenic sources in inland areas and anthropogenic sources over the ocean (Fig. S7).</p>
      <p id="d1e4020">Regional distribution of ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is similar to the change in SOA as shown in Fig. 3. In winter, a maximum averaged concentration of 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> occurs in the high-SOA region, where significant changes in SOA also occurs. In other areas, the averaged concentration of ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is about 0.5–1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Overall, the average ratio of ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to SOA is about 0.1–0.3 in winter. In summer, water
partitioning into OPM mostly occurs in the eastern coastal area at the surface,
where a significant increase in anthropogenic SOA (such as those from
toluene and xylenes) is observed. This might be due to the high polarity of
anthropogenic SVOCs (having more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>COOH groups) that absorb more water. In
the coastal area, the averaged concentration of ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is about 5–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALW</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 0.5–1.0. Over land, the averaged concentration of ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is about 1–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALW</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 0.2–0.5) in northeastern and eastern China. Water partitioning is mostly associated with biogenic SOA originated from isoprene and monoterpene oxidation that produces SVOCs with abundant OH groups.</p>
      <p id="d1e4196">Based on the column concentrations of ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALW</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (Fig. S8), more ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> must have occurred in winter in the southern and southwestern regions at higher levels, where a significant increase in col-SOA occurs (Fig. S5). The averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">col</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALW</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">col</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in the high-SOA area is 0.1–0.3. In summer, the ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> must be high at higher altitudes over the central regions in China. The maximum col-ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is about 7 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the YRD, with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">col</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALW</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">col</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of about 0.3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4311">Monthly averaged AOD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at 550 nm and changes in AOD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> due
to water partitioning into OPM and nonideality of the organic–water mixture. “Abs. Diff.” represents absolute differences (C3–BC); “Rel. Diff.” represents relative differences ((C3–BC)/BC; %).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/7291/2020/acp-20-7291-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Impacts on aerosol properties</title>
      <?pagebreak page7299?><p id="d1e4346">Since ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined in C3, the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be estimated from the modeled ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OA, and RH using Eq. (4). Nine representative cities were selected to investigate the relationship of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its seasonal variation as shown in Figs. S9 and S10. The results of all the cities in winter and summer are merged and analyzed as shown in Fig. 4. Pairs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data are
grouped into 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins, and the averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in each bin is then calculated. Overall, the estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is within the range of 0.2–0.8. The averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin is less than 0.1 in winter, with the highest value in Guangzhou. As more ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is formed in summer, the averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also increases greatly, with the highest value of 0.35 in Beijing. The linear correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows significant spatial and seasonal variations. For example, the slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 70 %–90 % smaller in winter than in summer in northern cities such as Shenyang, Beijing, Zhengzhou, and Xi'an. However, in Guangzhou, the slope is 83% higher in winter than in summer. In Chengdu, the slope is quite similar in both seasons. Overall, the slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the nine cities is 0.16 in winter and 0.40 in summer. Most of the fitted linear correlations of the individual cities fall outside of the range of 0.18–0.37 suggested in previous studies (Duplissy et al., 2011; Lambe et al., 2011; Massoli et al., 2010; Chang et al., 2010), indicating that the hygroscopicity of organic aerosol cannot be simply represented by a single parameter such as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (Rickards et al., 2013). In both seasons, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approaches zero and negative values as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases, which might be due to the linear regression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To avoid this, an exponential fitting of the two variables is performed so that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> falls in the range of (0, 1) and is positively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this case, the fitted correlations are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.88</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.29</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.06</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.50</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for January and July of 2013, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e4748">The impacts on aerosol optical depth (AOD) and aerosol radiative forcing (ARF) are further investigated. Figure 5 shows the monthly averaged AOD at 550 nm in January and July of 2013. It is calculated by summarizing the product of the model-estimated extinction coefficient of fine particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) multiplied by the thickness (HL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in each layer:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M293" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOD</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HL</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of layers. There are two methods to estimate the
aerosol extinction coefficient in CMAQ v5.0.1. One is based on the Mie theory
and the predicted aerosol component concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the other is based on correlation with the IMPROVE monitoring network, which considers the impacts of hygroscopicity of different aerosol components (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Malm et al., 1994). AOD calculated with the two types of extinction coefficient are denoted as AOD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and AOD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e4877">Monthly averaged shortwave direct aerosol radiative forcing at the
top of the atmosphere from C3 and the relative changes due to water
partitioning into OPM and nonideality of the organic–water mixture during
January and July of 2013. “Rel. Diff.” represents relative differences
((C3–BC)/BC; %).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/7291/2020/acp-20-7291-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4889">The sensitivity of SOA formation to temperature (TEMP), water mixing ratio, and the temperature dependence parameter of SVP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at Jinan (JN, <bold>a–d</bold>) and Nanjing (NJ, <bold>e–h</bold>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/7291/2020/acp-20-7291-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page7300?><p id="d1e4918">In Fig. 5, a clear pattern of high AOD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the SCB and the NCP and low
AOD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in western China is observed in both winter and summer, which is consistent
with previous studies (He et al., 2016, 2019; Luo et al., 2014). An identical trend in AOD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in Fig. S11. The monthly averaged AOD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from 1.0 to 3.2 in January and from 0.3 to 0.9 in July. AOD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is lower than AOD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, falling within the range of 0.7–2.2 in January and 0.3–0.6 in July. The model significantly overestimates AOD in January but agrees better with observations from MODIS, where AOD is high in July (Fig. S12). The bias in the predicted AOD might be partially due to the empirical equation applied in the calculation of AOD in CMAQ (Wang et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2010) and partially due to the uncertainties of fine AOD over land from the MODIS data (Wang et al., 2009; Levy et al., 2010). The increase in AOD due to ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a strong spatial and seasonal pattern. In winter, there are no significant changes in AOD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> across the whole domain due to insignificant changes in SOA. In summer, AOD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases significantly in the YRD and the adjacent areas by up to 10 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e5003"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>ARF represents the change in the radiative flux at the top of the atmosphere
due to aerosols. An offline version of the Shortwave Radiative Transfer
Model for GCMs (RRTMG_SW) was used to calculate the direct radiative effect of aerosols on shortwave radiation (Iacono et al., 2008). Generally, fine aerosols exhibit cooling effects on the shortwave radiation in both winter and summer over the entire domain as shown in Fig. 6. This impact is much stronger in the areas where AOD is high (Fig. 5). ARF is highest in Shandong in winter and in the coastal area near Jiangsu province in summer, amounting to about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. In winter, no significant changes in ARF are observed in eastern China (Fig. 6b). This is likely attributed to an insignificant contribution of SOA to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter compared to other components with cooling effects, such as sulfate. In
summer, SOA is an important component of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (20 %–60 %), and the
effects of water partitioning on shortwave radiation are relatively stronger. An enhancement in the cooling effects of ARF of up to 15 % occurs near the YRD region, where AOD significantly changes as well.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e5059">Monthly averaged impacts of water partitioning into OPM on SOA.
“Abs. Diff.” represents absolute differences (C3–C2); “Rel. Diff.”
represents relative differences ((C3–C2)/C2; %).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/7291/2020/acp-20-7291-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e5070">Monthly averaged impacts of nonideality of the organic–water
mixture on SOA. “Abs. Diff.” represents absolute differences (C3–C1);
“Rel. Diff.” represents relative differences ((C3–C1)/C1; %).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/7291/2020/acp-20-7291-2020-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Sensitivity to~$T$, RH, and~SVP}?><title>Sensitivity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, RH, and SVP</title>
      <p id="d1e5095">Meteorological conditions and SOA precursors affect the impacts of water
partitioning on SOA. To better illustrate the dependency of SOA on temperature, RH, and SVP of SVOCs, an offline calculation of SOA formation
was performed in two representative cities (Jinan, in the NCP, during winter and
Nanjing, in the YRD, during summer) when the daily maximum SOA increases occurred.
We assume temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and water vapor mixing ratio (QV) to be within the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the mean and standard deviation, respectively, calculated based on WRF predictions at each location. We choose 10 evenly distributed values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and QV within the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The temperature dependence parameter of SVP
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is also scaled separately by 0.2, 0.8, 1.4, and 2.0 for all the SVOCs. As shown in Fig. 7, SOA exhibits a negative correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a positive correlation with QV in both cities. SOA is more sensitive to QV under cold conditions (Jinan) and to temperature under hot conditions (Nanjing). When the temperature is fixed, the sensitivity of SOA to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is different in the two cities. We find more changes in SOA across <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Jinan. This is attributed to the temperature correction factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">corr</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in CMAQ as
defined below:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M327" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">corr</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference temperature (298 K), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is temperature. According to Fig. 7, the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is 265–274 K in Jinan and 300–307 K in Nanjing. The deviation of temperature from the reference value (298 K) is greater in Jinan than in Nanjing. Therefore, the unit change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> causes greater variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">corr</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Jinan. As a result, SOA is more sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The impacts of SVP estimation on SOA are more significant in winter than in summer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Separate impacts of water partitioning and polarity of condensed organics</title>
      <p id="d1e5404">The impacts of water partitioning into OPM and nonideality of the organic–water
mixture on SOA are in opposite directions. Water partitioning increases SOA
by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–20 % in winter and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–80 % in summer in most areas of the domain (Fig. 8). This is because the molecular weight of water is quite small and will reduce the mole-averaged molecular weight of the OPM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MW</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Eq. (2) (Pankow et al., 2015). The
reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MW</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> further increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and promotes<?pagebreak page7302?> mass transfer of SVOCs from the gas phase to OPM. On the other hand, by considering nonideality of the organic–water mixture, activity coefficients of SVOCs are usually greater than 1.0 in this study, leading to a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As a result, the total SOA concentration is reduced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–20 % in winter and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–50 % in summer
(Fig. 9). Overall, the final impacts are the combined consequences of the two processes. In winter, the increase in SOA caused by water partitioning is offset by the decrease in SOA due to the polarity of SVOCs in most areas of the domain, resulting in slight decreases in SOA. In summer, the effect of water partitioning overcomes that of SVOC polarity, so the total SOA loading increases. This further leads to an enhanced attenuation of shortwave solar radiation and cooling of the atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e5499">The WRF–CMAQ model was used to investigate the impacts of water partitioning into OPM and nonideality of the organic–water mixture on SOA formation over
eastern China during January and July of 2013. SOA is greatly enhanced in
summer, especially in the YRD and over the Yellow Sea, by up to 50 % and 60 %
at the surface and in the whole column, respectively. No significant impacts
on SOA are observed in winter. This might be due to the underestimation of
SOA in the current model. ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is highly correlated with the change in SOA, with a ratio of ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to SOA of 0.1–0.3 and 0.2–1.0 at the surface, where significant changes in SOA occur, in winter and summer, respectively. By using the modeled ALW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are examined in nine representative cities, showing significant spatial and seasonal variations. The increases in SOA lead to an enhancement in the averaged AOD and the cooling effects of aerosols by up to 10 % and 15 %, respectively, in summer. The model-predicted SOA is sensitive to temperature and QV in both seasons, with higher sensitivity to QV during winter and to temperature during summer. Estimation of SVP also affects modeled SOA, especially in a cold environment. The effects of water partitioning into OPM and nonideality of the organic–water mixture on SOA are the opposite. Since the activity coefficients of SVOCs are mostly greater than 1.0 during the simulated episode, SOA concentration decreases when the nonideality effect is considered. The averaged SOA concentration decreases by up to 20 % in winter and 50 % in summer. Water partitioning alone increases SOA by 10 %–20 % in winter and 30 %–80 % in summer. It should be noticed that the results shown in this study are the lower limit as the current model tends to underestimate SOA. It is crucial to consider both effects in simulating SOA formation under hot and humid conditions in CTMs.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5558">The data used in this paper can be provided upon request from the corresponding authors: Qi Ying (qying@civil.tamu.edu) and Jianlin Hu (jianlinhu@nuist.edu.cn).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e5561">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7291-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7291-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5570">JL, QY, and JH designed the research and contributed to model development and configurations. YLZ, XW, XL, and YS provided the observations of OC and OA. JL, HZ, QY, and JH analyzed the data. JL prepared the manuscript and all coauthors helped improve the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5576">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5582">The authors thank James F. Pankow for providing the SOA module code. Jingyi Li acknowledges the support from the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) and the Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e5587">This research has been supported by the National Key R &amp; D Program of China ((grant no. 2018YFC0213802, Task #2), the National Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41705102 and 41875149), the Major Research Plan of the National Social Science Foundation (grant no. 18ZDA052), and the  Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST (grant no. 2243141701014).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5593">This paper was edited by Astrid Kiendler-Scharr and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ansari, A. S. and Pandis, S. N.: Water Absorption by Secondary Organic Aerosol and Its Effect on Inorganic Aerosol Behavior, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 71–77, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es990717q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es990717q</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Asa-Awuku, A., Nenes, A., Gao, S., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Water-soluble SOA from Alkene ozonolysis: composition and droplet activation
kinetics inferences from analysis of CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
1585–1597, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1585-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1585-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R. W., Kang, S., Anderson, H. R., Mills, I. C., and Walton, H. A.:
Epidemiological time series studies of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and daily mortality and
hospital admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Thorax, 69,
660–665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204492" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204492</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7303?><ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ayers, G. P.: Comment on regression analysis of air quality data, Atmos.
Environ., 35, 2423–2425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00527-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00527-6</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bergström, R., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
Yttri, K. E., and Simpson, D.: Modelling of organic aerosols over Europe (2002–2007) using a volatility basis set (VBS) framework: application of different assumptions regarding the formation of secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8499–8527, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8499-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8499-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bowman, F. M. and Melton, J. A.: Effect of activity coefficient models on
predictions of secondary organic aerosol partitioning, J. Aerosol Sci., 35,
1415–1438, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.07.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.07.001</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boylan, J. W. and Russell, A. G.: PM and light extinction model performance
metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4946–4959, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Budisulistiorini, S. H., Nenes, A., Carlton, A. G., Surratt, J. D., McNeill,
V. F., and Pye, H. O. T.: Simulating Aqueous-Phase Isoprene-Epoxydiol (IEPOX) Secondary Organic Aerosol Production During the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS), Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5026–5034,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05750" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b05750</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cao, C., Jiang, W., Wang, B., Fang, J., Lang, J., Tian, G., Jiang, J., and Zhu, T. F.: Inhalable Microorganisms in Beijing's PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Pollutants during a Severe Smog Event, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 1499–1507, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es4048472" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es4048472</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Lovejoy, E. R., and Ravishankara, A. R.: Evidence for liquid-like and nonideal behavior of a mixture of organic aerosol components, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 18687–18691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802144105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0802144105</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Bhave, P. V., Napelenok, S. L., Edney, E. O., Sarwar, G.,
Pinder, R. W., Pouliot, G. A., and Houyoux, M.: Model Representation of
Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8553–8560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es100636q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es100636q</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chang, R. Y. W., Slowik, J. G., Shantz, N. C., Vlasenko, A., Liggio, J.,
Sjostedt, S. J., Leaitch, W. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: The hygroscopicity
parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of ambient organic aerosol at a field site subject to
biogenic and anthropogenic influences: relationship to degree of aerosol
oxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5047–5064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5047-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5047-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Denjean, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., Pangui, E., Zapf, P., Katrib, Y., Giorio, C., Tapparo, A., Monod, A., Temime-Roussel, B., Decorse,
P., Mangeney, C., and Doussin, J. F.: Relating hygroscopicity and optical
properties to chemical composition and structure of secondary organic aerosol particles generated from the ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3339–3358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3339-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3339-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 02635–02643, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052297c</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duplissy, J., DeCarlo, P. F., Dommen, J., Alfarra, M. R., Metzger, A.,
Barmpadimos, I., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Tritscher, T., Gysel, M., Aiken, A. C., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Collins, D. R., Tomlinson, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Relating hygroscopicity and composition of organic aerosol particulate matter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1155–1165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I., Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres, S., Acir, I.-H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurtén, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jørgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Maso, M. D., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13032</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>El-Sayed, M. M. H., Ortiz-Montalvo, D. L., and Hennigan, C. J.: The effects
of isoprene and NOx on secondary organic aerosols formed through reversible
and irreversible uptake to aerosol water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1171–1184,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1171-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-1171-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Emery, C., Tai, E., and Yarwood, G.: Enhanced meteorological modeling and
performance evaluation for two texas episodes, Report to the Texas Natural
Resources Conservation Commission, prepared by ENVIRON, International Corp.,
Novato, CA, available at: <uri>https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/implementation/air/am/contracts/reports/mm/EnhancedMetModelingAndPerformanceEvaluation.pdf</uri>
(last access: 10 May 2019), 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>EPA: U.S.: Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Regional
Haze, EPA-454/B-07-002, available at: <uri>https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P1009OL1.PDF?Dockey=P1009OL1.PDF</uri>
(last access: 10 May 2019), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fredenslund, A., Jones, R. L., and Prausnitz, J. M.: Group-contribution
estimation of activity coefficients in nonideal liquid mixtures, AICHE J., 21, 1086–1099, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690210607" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/aic.690210607</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, H. and Chen, J.: Formation, features and controlling strategies of severe haze-fog pollutions in China, Sci. Total Environ., 578, 121–138,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.201</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Galloway, M. M., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Flagan, R.
C., Seinfeld, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal uptake on ammonium sulphate
seed aerosol: reaction products and reversibility of uptake under dark and
irradiated conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3331–3345,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gentner, D. R., Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Bahreini, R., Day, D. A., El
Haddad, I., Hayes, P. L., Pieber, S. M., Platt, S. M., de Gouw, J.,
Goldstein, A. H., Harley, R. A., Jimenez, J. L., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
and Robinson, A. L.: Review of Urban Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation
from Gasoline and Diesel Motor Vehicle Emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
51, 1074–1093, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b04509</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Xu, L., Bougiatioti, A., Cerully, K. M., Capps, S. L., Hite Jr., J.
R., Carlton, A. G., Lee, S. H., Bergin, M. H., Ng, N. L., Nenes, A., and
Weber, R. J.: Fine-particle water and pH in th<?pagebreak page7304?>e southeastern United States,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5211–5228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hayes, P. L., Carlton, A. G., Baker, K. R., Ahmadov, R., Washenfelder, R.
A., Alvarez, S., Rappenglück, B., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw,
J. A., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Kleindienst, T. E.,
Offenberg, J. H., Ma, P. K., and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling the formation and
aging of secondary organic aerosols in Los Angeles during CalNex 2010,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5773–5801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>He, Q., Zhang, M., and Huang, B.: Spatio-temporal variation and impact factors analysis of satellite-based aerosol optical depth over China from 2002 to 2015, Atmos. Environ., 129, 79–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.002</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>He, Q., Gu, Y., and Zhang, M.: Spatiotemporal patterns of aerosol optical
depth throughout China from 2003 to 2016, Sci. Total Environ., 653, 23–35,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.307" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.307</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Healy, R. M., Temime, B., Kuprovskyte, K., and Wenger, J. C.: Effect of
Relative Humidity on Gas/Particle Partitioning and Aerosol Mass Yield in the
Photooxidation of p-Xylene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1884–1889,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es802404z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es802404z</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hodzic, A., Jimenez, J. L., Madronich, S., Canagaratna, M. R., DeCarlo, P. F., Kleinman, L., and Fast, J.: Modeling organic aerosols in a megacity:
potential contribution of semi-volatile and intermediate volatility primary
organic compounds to secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5491–5514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5491-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5491-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, J., Chen, J., Ying, Q., and Zhang, H.: One-year simulation of ozone and
particulate matter in China using WRF/CMAQ modeling system, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 10333–10350, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10333-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10333-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, J., Wang, P., Ying, Q., Zhang, H., Chen, J., Ge, X., Li, X., Jiang, J.,
Wang, S., Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., and Zhang, Y.: Modeling biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic aerosol in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
77–92, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-77-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-77-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, R.-J., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K.-F., Cao, J.-J., Han, Y., Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga, A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An, Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., Haddad, I. E., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13774</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases:
Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D13103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009944" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd009944</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jathar, S. H., Mahmud, A., Barsanti, K. C., Asher, W. E., Pankow, J. F., and
Kleeman, M. J.: Water uptake by organic aerosol and its influence on gas/particle partitioning of secondary organic aerosol in the United States,
Atmos. Environ., 129, 142–154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.001</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiang, F., Liu, Q., Huang, X., Wang, T., Zhuang, B., and Xie, M.: Regional
modeling of secondary organic aerosol over China using WRF/Chem, J. Aerosol
Sci., 43, 57–73, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.09.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.09.003</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I.,
Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S.,
Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi,
T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M.,
Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kim, Y., Sartelet, K., and Couvidat, F.: Modeling the effect of non-ideality, dynamic mass transfer and viscosity on SOA formation in a 3-D air quality model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1241–1261, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1241-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-1241-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Knote, C., Hodzic, A., Jimenez, J. L., Volkamer, R., Orlando, J. J., Baidar,
S., Brioude, J., Fast, J., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Hayes, P. L.,
Knighton, W. B., Oetjen, H., Setyan, A., Stark, H., Thalman, R., Tyndall,
G., Washenfelder, R., Waxman, E., and Zhang, Q.: Simulation of semi-explicit
mechanisms of SOA formation from glyoxal in aerosol in a 3-D model, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 6213–6239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6213-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6213-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kurokawa, J., Ohara, T., Morikawa, T., Hanayama, S., Janssens-Maenhout, G.,
Fukui, T., Kawashima, K., and Akimoto, H.: Emissions of air pollutants and
greenhouse gases over Asian regions during 2000–2008: Regional Emission
inventory in ASia (REAS) version 2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11019–11058,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11019-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-11019-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lai, S., Zhao, Y., Ding, A., Zhang, Y., Song, T., Zheng, J., Ho, K. F., Lee,
S.-c., and Zhong, L.: Characterization of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the major chemical
components during a 1-year campaign in rural Guangzhou, Southern China,
Atmos. Res., 167, 208–215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.007</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lambe, A. T., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Croasdale, D. R., Wright, J. P.,
Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Worsnop, D. R., Brune, W. H., and Davidovits,
P.: Laboratory studies of the chemical composition and cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN) activity of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and oxidized
primary organic aerosol (OPOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8913–8928,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., Kleidman, R. G., Mattoo, S., Ichoku, C., Kahn, R., and Eck, T. F.: Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target
aerosol products over land, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10399–10420,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10399-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10399-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, J., Cleveland, M., Ziemba, L. D., Griffin, R. J., Barsanti, K. C., Pankow, J. F., and Ying, Q.: Modeling regional secondary organic aerosol
using the Master Chemical Mechanism, Atmos. Environ., 102, 52–61, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.054</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, J., Zhang, M., Wu, F., Sun, Y., and Tang, G.: Assessment of the impacts
of aromatic VOC emissions an<?pagebreak page7305?>d yields of SOA on SOA concentrations with the
air quality model RAMS-CMAQ, Atmos. Environ., 158, 105–115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.035</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, X., Song, S., Zhou, W., Hao, J., Worsnop, D. R., and Jiang, J.: Interactions between aerosol organic components and liquid water content
during haze episodes in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12163–12174,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12163-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-12163-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, Y. J., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Li, M., Zhou, Z., and Chan, C. K.:
Real-time chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter in
China: A review, Atmos. Environ., 158, 270–304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.027</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., and Turpin, B. J.: Chemical insights, explicit chemistry, and yields of secondary organic aerosol from OH radical oxidation
of methylglyoxal and glyoxal in the aqueous phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
8651–8667, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8651-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8651-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, J., An, J., Qu, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Tang, Y., Wang, F., and Xiang, W.: Local and distant source contributions to secondary organic aerosol in the Beijing urban area in summer, Atmos. Environ., 124, 176–185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.098</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Shen, J., Cheng, Z., Wang, P., Ying, Q., Zhao, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhao,
Y., and Fu, Q.: Source apportionment and regional transport of anthropogenic
secondary organic aerosol during winter pollution periods in the Yangtze
River Delta, China, Sci. Total Environ., 710, 135620, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135620" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135620</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, X.-H., Zhang, Y., Cheng, S.-H., Xing, J., Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G.,
Jang, C., Wang, W.-X., and Hao, J.-M.: Understanding of regional air
pollution over China using CMAQ, part I performance evaluation and seasonal
variation, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2415–2426, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.035</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Luo, Y. X., Zheng, X. B., Zhao, T. L., and Chen, J.: A climatology of aerosol optical depth over China from recent 10 years of MODIS remote sensing data, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 863–870, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3728" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.3728</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Malm, W. C., Sisler, J. F., Huffman, D., Eldred, R. A., and Cahill, T. A.:
Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction
in the United States, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 1347–1370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02916" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93JD02916</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Massoli, P., Lambe, A. T., Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Ehn, M., Mikkilä, J., Canagaratna, M. R., Brune, W. H., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J.
T., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Kolb, C. E., Davidovits,
P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Relationship between aerosol oxidation level and
hygroscopic properties of laboratory generated secondary organic aerosol (SOA) particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045258" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL045258</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murphy, B. N., Woody, M. C., Jimenez, J. L., Carlton, A. M. G., Hayes, P. L., Liu, S., Ng, N. L., Russell, L. M., Setyan, A., Xu, L., Young, J., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, Q., and Pye, H. O. T.: Semivolatile POA and parameterized total combustion SOA in CMAQv5.2: impacts on source strength and partitioning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11107–11133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Odum, J. R., Hoffmann, T., Bowman, F., Collins, D., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas/Particle Partitioning and Secondary Organic Aerosol
Yields, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2580–2585, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es950943+" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es950943+</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pankow, J. F.: An absorption model of gas/particle partitioning of organic
compounds in the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 28, 185–188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90093-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1352-2310(94)90093-0</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pankow, J. F., Marks, M. C., Barsanti, K. C., Mahmud, A., Asher, W. E., Li,
J., Ying, Q., Jathar, S. H., and Kleeman, M. J.: Molecular view modeling of
atmospheric organic particulate matter: Incorporating molecular structure
and co-condensation of water, Atmos. Environ., 122, 400–408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.001</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of
hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prisle, N. L., Engelhart, G. J., Bilde, M., and Donahue, N. M.: Humidity
influence on gas-particle phase partitioning of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl041402" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009gl041402</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Murphy, B. N., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Carlton, A. G., Guo, H.,
Weber, R., Vasilakos, P., Appel, K. W., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Surratt, J.
D., Nenes, A., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Misztal, P. K., and Goldstein, A. H.: On the implications of aerosol liquid water and phase separation for organic aerosol mass, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 343–369,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-343-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-343-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Qiao, X., Ying, Q., Li, X., Zhang, H., Hu, J., Tang, Y., and Chen, X.: Source apportionment of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for 25 Chinese provincial capitals and
municipalities using a source-oriented Community Multiscale Air Quality
model, Sci. Total Environ., 612, 462–471, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.272" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.272</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Kiehl, J. T., and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosols,
Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle, Science, 294, 2119–2124,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1064034</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rickards, A. M. J., Miles, R. E. H., Davies, J. F., Marshall, F. H., and
Reid, J. P.: Measurements of the Sensitivity of Aerosol Hygroscopicity and
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Parameter to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ratio, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117,
14120–14131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp407991n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp407991n</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage, A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.: Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1133061</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seinfeld, J. H., Erdakos, G. B., Asher, W. E., and Pankow, J. F.: Modeling
the Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA). 2. The Predicted Effects
of Relative Humidity on Aerosol Formation in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene-, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene-, Sabinene-, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>3-Carene-, and Cyclohexene-Ozone Systems,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 1806–1817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es001765+" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es001765+</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shi, Z., Li, J., Huang, L., Wang, P., Wu, L., Ying, Q., Zhang, H., Lu, L.,
Liu, X., Liao, H., and Hu, J.: Source apportionment of fine particulate
matter in China in 2013 using a source-oriented chemical transport model,
Sci. Total Environ., 601–602, 1476–1487, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.019</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B., Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Ng, N. L., Petaja, T., Pierce, J. R., Rasch, P. J., Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Shilling, J., Smith, J. N., Thornton, J. A., Volkamer, R., Wang, J.<?pagebreak page7306?>, Worsnop, D. R., Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing, Rev. Geophys., 55, 509–559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016RG000540</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M. K., Lane, T. E., Donahue, N. M., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: Effects of gas particle partitioning and aging of primary emissions on urban and regional organic aerosol concentrations, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D18301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009735</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Simon, H. and Bhave, P. V.: Simulating the Degree of Oxidation in Atmospheric Organic Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 331–339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202361w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es202361w</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, J., Liang, M., Shi, Z., Shen, F., Li, J., Huang, L., Ge, X., Chen, Q.,
Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., Chang, Y., Ji, D., Ying, Q., Zhang, H., Kota, S. H., and
Hu, J.: Investigating the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration growth processes during 2013–2016 in Beijing and Shanghai, Chemosphere, 221, 452–463, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.200" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.200</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Du, W., Fu, P., Wang, Q., Li, J., Ge, X., Zhang, Q., Zhu, C., Ren,
L., Xu, W., Zhao, J., Han, T., Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, Z.: Primary and
secondary aerosols in Beijing in winter: sources, variations and processes,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8309–8329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J., and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tkacik, D. S., Presto, A. A., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Secondary
Organic Aerosol Formation from Intermediate-Volatility Organic Compounds:
Cyclic, Linear, and Branched Alkanes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 8773–8781, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301112c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es301112c</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Varutbangkul, V., Brechtel, F. J., Bahreini, R., Ng, N. L., Keywood, M. D.,
Kroll, J. H., Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., Lee, A., and Goldstein, A. H.:
Hygroscopicity of secondary organic aerosols formed by oxidation of cycloalkenes, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and related compounds, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 6, 2367–2388, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2367-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-2367-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, H. B., Tian, M., Li, X. H., Chang, Q., Cao, J. J., Yang, F. M., Ma, Y. L., and He, K. B.: Chemical Composition and Light Extinction Contribution of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Urban Beijing for a 1-Year Period, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 15, 2200–2211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.04.0257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2015.04.0257</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Jang, C., Phillips, S., and Wang, B.: Modeling intercontinental air pollution transport over the trans-Pacific region in 2001 using the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D04307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010807" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010807</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wiedensohler, A., Cheng, Y. F., Nowak, A., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Berghof,
M., Birmili, W., Wu, Z. J., Hu, M., Zhu, T., Takegawa, N., Kita, K., Kondo, Y., Lou, S. R., Hofzumahaus, A., Holland, F., Wahner, A., Gunthe, S. S.,
Rose, D., Su, H., and Pöschl, U.: Rapid aerosol particle growth and increase of cloud condensation nucleus activity by secondary aerosol formation and condensation: A case study for regional air pollution in
northeastern China, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00G08, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010884" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010884</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Emmons, L. K., Al-Saadi, J.
A., Orlando, J. J., and Soja, A. J.: The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a
high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning,
Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 625–641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Woody, M. C., Baker, K. R., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Koo, B., and Pye, H. O. T.: Understanding sources of organic aerosol during CalNex-2010 using
the CMAQ-VBS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4081–4100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ying, Q., Cureño, I. V., Chen, G., Ali, S., Zhang, H., Malloy, M., Bravo, H. A., and Sosa, R.: Impacts of Stabilized Criegee Intermediates, surface uptake processes and higher aromatic secondary organic aerosol yields on predicted PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the Mexico City Metropolitan Zone, Atmos. Environ., 94, 438–447, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.056</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ying, Q., Li, J., and Kota, S. H.: Significant Contributions of Isoprene to
Summertime Secondary Organic Aerosol in Eastern United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 7834–7842, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02514" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b02514</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Hu, J., Kleeman, M., and Ying, Q.: Source apportionment of sulfate and nitrate particulate matter in the Eastern United States and effectiveness of emission control programs, Sci. Total Environ., 490, 171–181, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.064</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., He, K. B., Huo, H., Kannari, A., Klimont, Z., Park, I. S., Reddy, S., Fu, J. S., Chen, D., Duan, L., Lei,
Y., Wang, L. T., and Yao, Z. L.: Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B mission, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5131–5153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, B., Wang, S., Donahue, N. M., Jathar, S. H., Huang, X., Wu, W., Hao, J., and Robinson, A. L.: Quantifying the effect of organic aerosol aging and
intermediate-volatility emissions on regional-scale aerosol pollution in China, Sci. Rep., 6, 28815, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28815" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep28815</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, D. F., Buchholz, A., Kortner, B., Schlag, P., Rubach, F., Fuchs, H.,
Kiendler-Scharr, A., Tillmann, R., Wahner, A., Watne, Å. K., Hallquist, M., Flores, J. M., Rudich, Y., Kristensen, K., Hansen, A. M. K., Glasius, M., Kourtchev, I., Kalberer, M., and Mentel, T. F.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity, droplet growth kinetics, and hygroscopicity of biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic aerosol (SOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
1105–1121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1105-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1105-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, J., Qiu, Y., Zhou, W., Xu, W., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Xie, C.,
Wang, Q., Du, W., Worsnop, D. R., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhou, L., Ge, X., Fu,
P., Li, J., Wang, Z., Donahue, N. M., and Sun, Y.: Organic Aerosol Processing During Winter Severe Haze Episodes in Beijing, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 10248–10263, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030832" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019jd030832</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., Tkacik, D. S., de Gouw, J. A., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., Borbon, A., and Robinson, A. L.: Intermediate-Volatility Organic Compounds: A Large Source of Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 13743–13750,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5035188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es5035188</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., He, K. B., Wang, K., Zheng, G. J., Duan, F.
K., Ma, Y. L., and Kimoto, T.: Heterogeneous chemistry: a mechanism missing
in current models to explain secondary inorganic aerosol formation during
the January 2013 haze episode in North China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
2031–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Impacts of water partitioning and polarity of organic compounds  on secondary organic aerosol over eastern China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) is an important component of fine particular matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>). Most air quality models use an equilibrium partitioning method along with the saturation vapor pressure (SVP) of semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) to predict SOA formation. However, the models typically assume that the organic particulate matter (OPM) is an ideal mixture and ignore the partitioning of water vapor to OPM. In this study, the Community Multiscale Air Quality model (CMAQ) is updated to investigate the impacts of water vapor partitioning and nonideality of the
organic–water mixture on SOA formation during winter (January) and summer
(July) of 2013 over eastern China. The updated model treats the partitioning of water vapor molecules into OPM and uses the universal functional activity coefficient (UNIFAC) model to estimate the activity coefficients of species in the organic–water mixture. The modified model can generally capture the observed surface organic carbon (OC) with a correlation coefficient <i>R</i> of 0.7 and the surface organic aerosol (OA) with the mean fractional bias (MFB) and mean fractional error (MFE) of −0.28 and 0.54, respectively. SOA concentration shows significant seasonal and spatial variations, with high concentrations in the North China Plain (NCP), central China, and the Sichuan Basin (SCB) regions during winter (up to 25&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>) and in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) during summer (up to 16&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>). In winter, SOA decreases slightly in the updated model, with a monthly averaged relative change of 10&thinsp;%–20&thinsp;% in the highly concentrated areas, mainly due to organic–water interactions. The monthly averaged concentration of SOA increases greatly in summer, by 20&thinsp;%–50&thinsp;% at the surface and 30&thinsp;%–60&thinsp;% in the whole column. The increase in SOA is mainly due
to the increase in biogenic SOA in inland areas and anthropogenic SOA in
coastal areas. As a result, the averaged aerosol optical depth (AOD) is
increased by up to 10&thinsp;%, and the cooling effect of aerosol radiative
forcing (ARF) is enhanced by up to 15&thinsp;% over the YRD in summer. The aerosol
liquid water content associated with OPM (ALW<sub>org</sub>) at the surface is relatively high in inland areas in winter and over the ocean in summer, with a monthly averaged concentration of 0.5–3.0 and 5–7&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively. The hygroscopicity parameter <i>κ</i> of OA based on the <i>κ</i>–Köhler theory is determined using the modeled ALW<sub>org</sub>. The correlation of <i>κ</i> with the O : C ratio varies significantly across
different cities and seasons. Analysis of two representative cities, Jinan
(in the NCP) and Nanjing (in the YRD), shows that the impacts of water partitioning
and nonideality of the organic–water mixture on SOA are sensitive to
temperature, relative humidity (RH), and the SVP of SVOCs. The two processes exhibit opposite impacts on SOA in eastern China. Water uptake increases SOA by up to 80&thinsp;% in the organic phase, while including nonunity activity coefficients decreases SOA by up to 50&thinsp;%. Our results indicate that both water partitioning into OPM and the activity coefficients of the condensed organics should be considered in simulating SOA formation from gas–particle partitioning, especially in hot and humid environments.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ansari, A. S. and Pandis, S. N.: Water Absorption by Secondary Organic Aerosol and Its Effect on Inorganic Aerosol Behavior, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 71–77, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es990717q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es990717q</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Asa-Awuku, A., Nenes, A., Gao, S., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Water-soluble SOA from Alkene ozonolysis: composition and droplet activation
kinetics inferences from analysis of CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
1585–1597, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1585-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1585-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, R. W., Kang, S., Anderson, H. R., Mills, I. C., and Walton, H. A.:
Epidemiological time series studies of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and daily mortality and
hospital admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Thorax, 69,
660–665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204492" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204492</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Ayers, G. P.: Comment on regression analysis of air quality data, Atmos.
Environ., 35, 2423–2425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00527-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00527-6</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bergström, R., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
Yttri, K. E., and Simpson, D.: Modelling of organic aerosols over Europe (2002–2007) using a volatility basis set (VBS) framework: application of different assumptions regarding the formation of secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8499–8527, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8499-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8499-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bowman, F. M. and Melton, J. A.: Effect of activity coefficient models on
predictions of secondary organic aerosol partitioning, J. Aerosol Sci., 35,
1415–1438, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.07.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.07.001</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Boylan, J. W. and Russell, A. G.: PM and light extinction model performance
metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4946–4959, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Budisulistiorini, S. H., Nenes, A., Carlton, A. G., Surratt, J. D., McNeill,
V. F., and Pye, H. O. T.: Simulating Aqueous-Phase Isoprene-Epoxydiol (IEPOX) Secondary Organic Aerosol Production During the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS), Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5026–5034,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05750" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05750</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, C., Jiang, W., Wang, B., Fang, J., Lang, J., Tian, G., Jiang, J., and Zhu, T. F.: Inhalable Microorganisms in Beijing's PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> Pollutants during a Severe Smog Event, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 1499–1507, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es4048472" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es4048472</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cappa, C. D., Lovejoy, E. R., and Ravishankara, A. R.: Evidence for liquid-like and nonideal behavior of a mixture of organic aerosol components, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 18687–18691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802144105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802144105</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Carlton, A. G., Bhave, P. V., Napelenok, S. L., Edney, E. O., Sarwar, G.,
Pinder, R. W., Pouliot, G. A., and Houyoux, M.: Model Representation of
Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8553–8560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es100636q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es100636q</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, R. Y. W., Slowik, J. G., Shantz, N. C., Vlasenko, A., Liggio, J.,
Sjostedt, S. J., Leaitch, W. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: The hygroscopicity
parameter (<i>κ</i>) of ambient organic aerosol at a field site subject to
biogenic and anthropogenic influences: relationship to degree of aerosol
oxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5047–5064, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5047-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5047-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Denjean, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., Pangui, E., Zapf, P., Katrib, Y., Giorio, C., Tapparo, A., Monod, A., Temime-Roussel, B., Decorse,
P., Mangeney, C., and Doussin, J. F.: Relating hygroscopicity and optical
properties to chemical composition and structure of secondary organic aerosol particles generated from the ozonolysis of <i>α</i>-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3339–3358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3339-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3339-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 02635–02643, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Duplissy, J., DeCarlo, P. F., Dommen, J., Alfarra, M. R., Metzger, A.,
Barmpadimos, I., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Tritscher, T., Gysel, M., Aiken, A. C., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Collins, D. R., Tomlinson, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Relating hygroscopicity and composition of organic aerosol particulate matter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1155–1165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I., Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres, S., Acir, I.-H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurtén, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jørgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Maso, M. D., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
El-Sayed, M. M. H., Ortiz-Montalvo, D. L., and Hennigan, C. J.: The effects
of isoprene and NOx on secondary organic aerosols formed through reversible
and irreversible uptake to aerosol water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1171–1184,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1171-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1171-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Emery, C., Tai, E., and Yarwood, G.: Enhanced meteorological modeling and
performance evaluation for two texas episodes, Report to the Texas Natural
Resources Conservation Commission, prepared by ENVIRON, International Corp.,
Novato, CA, available at: <a href="https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/implementation/air/am/contracts/reports/mm/EnhancedMetModelingAndPerformanceEvaluation.pdf" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 10 May 2019), 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
EPA: U.S.: Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM<sub>2:5</sub>, and Regional
Haze, EPA-454/B-07-002, available at: <a href="https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P1009OL1.PDF?Dockey=P1009OL1.PDF" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 10 May 2019), 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Fredenslund, A., Jones, R. L., and Prausnitz, J. M.: Group-contribution
estimation of activity coefficients in nonideal liquid mixtures, AICHE J., 21, 1086–1099, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690210607" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690210607</a>, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, H. and Chen, J.: Formation, features and controlling strategies of severe haze-fog pollutions in China, Sci. Total Environ., 578, 121–138,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.201</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Galloway, M. M., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Flagan, R.
C., Seinfeld, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal uptake on ammonium sulphate
seed aerosol: reaction products and reversibility of uptake under dark and
irradiated conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3331–3345,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gentner, D. R., Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Bahreini, R., Day, D. A., El
Haddad, I., Hayes, P. L., Pieber, S. M., Platt, S. M., de Gouw, J.,
Goldstein, A. H., Harley, R. A., Jimenez, J. L., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
and Robinson, A. L.: Review of Urban Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation
from Gasoline and Diesel Motor Vehicle Emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
51, 1074–1093, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, H., Xu, L., Bougiatioti, A., Cerully, K. M., Capps, S. L., Hite Jr., J.
R., Carlton, A. G., Lee, S. H., Bergin, M. H., Ng, N. L., Nenes, A., and
Weber, R. J.: Fine-particle water and pH in the southeastern United States,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5211–5228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hayes, P. L., Carlton, A. G., Baker, K. R., Ahmadov, R., Washenfelder, R.
A., Alvarez, S., Rappenglück, B., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw,
J. A., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Kleindienst, T. E.,
Offenberg, J. H., Ma, P. K., and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling the formation and
aging of secondary organic aerosols in Los Angeles during CalNex 2010,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5773–5801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
He, Q., Zhang, M., and Huang, B.: Spatio-temporal variation and impact factors analysis of satellite-based aerosol optical depth over China from 2002 to 2015, Atmos. Environ., 129, 79–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.002</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
He, Q., Gu, Y., and Zhang, M.: Spatiotemporal patterns of aerosol optical
depth throughout China from 2003 to 2016, Sci. Total Environ., 653, 23–35,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.307" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.307</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Healy, R. M., Temime, B., Kuprovskyte, K., and Wenger, J. C.: Effect of
Relative Humidity on Gas/Particle Partitioning and Aerosol Mass Yield in the
Photooxidation of p-Xylene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1884–1889,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es802404z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es802404z</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hodzic, A., Jimenez, J. L., Madronich, S., Canagaratna, M. R., DeCarlo, P. F., Kleinman, L., and Fast, J.: Modeling organic aerosols in a megacity:
potential contribution of semi-volatile and intermediate volatility primary
organic compounds to secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5491–5514, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5491-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5491-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, J., Chen, J., Ying, Q., and Zhang, H.: One-year simulation of ozone and
particulate matter in China using WRF/CMAQ modeling system, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 10333–10350, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10333-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10333-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, J., Wang, P., Ying, Q., Zhang, H., Chen, J., Ge, X., Li, X., Jiang, J.,
Wang, S., Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., and Zhang, Y.: Modeling biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic aerosol in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
77–92, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-77-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-77-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, R.-J., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K.-F., Cao, J.-J., Han, Y., Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga, A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An, Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., Haddad, I. E., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases:
Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D13103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009944" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009944</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Jathar, S. H., Mahmud, A., Barsanti, K. C., Asher, W. E., Pankow, J. F., and
Kleeman, M. J.: Water uptake by organic aerosol and its influence on gas/particle partitioning of secondary organic aerosol in the United States,
Atmos. Environ., 129, 142–154, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.001</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, F., Liu, Q., Huang, X., Wang, T., Zhuang, B., and Xie, M.: Regional
modeling of secondary organic aerosol over China using WRF/Chem, J. Aerosol
Sci., 43, 57–73, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.09.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.09.003</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I.,
Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S.,
Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi,
T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M.,
Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, Y., Sartelet, K., and Couvidat, F.: Modeling the effect of non-ideality, dynamic mass transfer and viscosity on SOA formation in a 3-D air quality model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1241–1261, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1241-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1241-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Knote, C., Hodzic, A., Jimenez, J. L., Volkamer, R., Orlando, J. J., Baidar,
S., Brioude, J., Fast, J., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Hayes, P. L.,
Knighton, W. B., Oetjen, H., Setyan, A., Stark, H., Thalman, R., Tyndall,
G., Washenfelder, R., Waxman, E., and Zhang, Q.: Simulation of semi-explicit
mechanisms of SOA formation from glyoxal in aerosol in a 3-D model, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 6213–6239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6213-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6213-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kurokawa, J., Ohara, T., Morikawa, T., Hanayama, S., Janssens-Maenhout, G.,
Fukui, T., Kawashima, K., and Akimoto, H.: Emissions of air pollutants and
greenhouse gases over Asian regions during 2000–2008: Regional Emission
inventory in ASia (REAS) version 2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11019–11058,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11019-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11019-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lai, S., Zhao, Y., Ding, A., Zhang, Y., Song, T., Zheng, J., Ho, K. F., Lee,
S.-c., and Zhong, L.: Characterization of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and the major chemical
components during a 1-year campaign in rural Guangzhou, Southern China,
Atmos. Res., 167, 208–215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.007</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Croasdale, D. R., Wright, J. P.,
Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Worsnop, D. R., Brune, W. H., and Davidovits,
P.: Laboratory studies of the chemical composition and cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN) activity of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and oxidized
primary organic aerosol (OPOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8913–8928,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., Kleidman, R. G., Mattoo, S., Ichoku, C., Kahn, R., and Eck, T. F.: Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target
aerosol products over land, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10399–10420,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10399-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10399-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Cleveland, M., Ziemba, L. D., Griffin, R. J., Barsanti, K. C., Pankow, J. F., and Ying, Q.: Modeling regional secondary organic aerosol
using the Master Chemical Mechanism, Atmos. Environ., 102, 52–61, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.054</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Zhang, M., Wu, F., Sun, Y., and Tang, G.: Assessment of the impacts
of aromatic VOC emissions and yields of SOA on SOA concentrations with the
air quality model RAMS-CMAQ, Atmos. Environ., 158, 105–115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.035</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X., Song, S., Zhou, W., Hao, J., Worsnop, D. R., and Jiang, J.: Interactions between aerosol organic components and liquid water content
during haze episodes in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12163–12174,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12163-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12163-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y. J., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Li, M., Zhou, Z., and Chan, C. K.:
Real-time chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter in
China: A review, Atmos. Environ., 158, 270–304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.027</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., and Turpin, B. J.: Chemical insights, explicit chemistry, and yields of secondary organic aerosol from OH radical oxidation
of methylglyoxal and glyoxal in the aqueous phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
8651–8667, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8651-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8651-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, J., An, J., Qu, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Tang, Y., Wang, F., and Xiang, W.: Local and distant source contributions to secondary organic aerosol in the Beijing urban area in summer, Atmos. Environ., 124, 176–185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.098" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.098</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Shen, J., Cheng, Z., Wang, P., Ying, Q., Zhao, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhao,
Y., and Fu, Q.: Source apportionment and regional transport of anthropogenic
secondary organic aerosol during winter pollution periods in the Yangtze
River Delta, China, Sci. Total Environ., 710, 135620, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135620" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135620</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X.-H., Zhang, Y., Cheng, S.-H., Xing, J., Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G.,
Jang, C., Wang, W.-X., and Hao, J.-M.: Understanding of regional air
pollution over China using CMAQ, part I performance evaluation and seasonal
variation, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2415–2426, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.035</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Luo, Y. X., Zheng, X. B., Zhao, T. L., and Chen, J.: A climatology of aerosol optical depth over China from recent 10 years of MODIS remote sensing data, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 863–870, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3728" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3728</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Malm, W. C., Sisler, J. F., Huffman, D., Eldred, R. A., and Cahill, T. A.:
Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction
in the United States, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 1347–1370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02916" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02916</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Massoli, P., Lambe, A. T., Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Ehn, M., Mikkilä, J., Canagaratna, M. R., Brune, W. H., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J.
T., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Kolb, C. E., Davidovits,
P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Relationship between aerosol oxidation level and
hygroscopic properties of laboratory generated secondary organic aerosol (SOA) particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045258" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045258</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, B. N., Woody, M. C., Jimenez, J. L., Carlton, A. M. G., Hayes, P. L., Liu, S., Ng, N. L., Russell, L. M., Setyan, A., Xu, L., Young, J., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, Q., and Pye, H. O. T.: Semivolatile POA and parameterized total combustion SOA in CMAQv5.2: impacts on source strength and partitioning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11107–11133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Odum, J. R., Hoffmann, T., Bowman, F., Collins, D., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas/Particle Partitioning and Secondary Organic Aerosol
Yields, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2580–2585, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es950943+" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es950943+</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Pankow, J. F.: An absorption model of gas/particle partitioning of organic
compounds in the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 28, 185–188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90093-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90093-0</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Pankow, J. F., Marks, M. C., Barsanti, K. C., Mahmud, A., Asher, W. E., Li,
J., Ying, Q., Jathar, S. H., and Kleeman, M. J.: Molecular view modeling of
atmospheric organic particulate matter: Incorporating molecular structure
and co-condensation of water, Atmos. Environ., 122, 400–408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.001</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of
hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Prisle, N. L., Engelhart, G. J., Bilde, M., and Donahue, N. M.: Humidity
influence on gas-particle phase partitioning of <i>α</i>-pinene&thinsp;+&thinsp;O<sub>3</sub> secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl041402" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl041402</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Pye, H. O. T., Murphy, B. N., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Carlton, A. G., Guo, H.,
Weber, R., Vasilakos, P., Appel, K. W., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Surratt, J.
D., Nenes, A., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Misztal, P. K., and Goldstein, A. H.: On the implications of aerosol liquid water and phase separation for organic aerosol mass, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 343–369,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-343-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-343-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Qiao, X., Ying, Q., Li, X., Zhang, H., Hu, J., Tang, Y., and Chen, X.: Source apportionment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> for 25 Chinese provincial capitals and
municipalities using a source-oriented Community Multiscale Air Quality
model, Sci. Total Environ., 612, 462–471, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.272" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.272</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Kiehl, J. T., and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosols,
Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle, Science, 294, 2119–2124,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064034</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Rickards, A. M. J., Miles, R. E. H., Davies, J. F., Marshall, F. H., and
Reid, J. P.: Measurements of the Sensitivity of Aerosol Hygroscopicity and
the <i>κ</i> Parameter to the O∕C Ratio, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117,
14120–14131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp407991n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp407991n</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage, A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.: Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H., Erdakos, G. B., Asher, W. E., and Pankow, J. F.: Modeling
the Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA). 2. The Predicted Effects
of Relative Humidity on Aerosol Formation in the <i>α</i>-Pinene-, <i>β</i>-Pinene-, Sabinene-, Δ3-Carene-, and Cyclohexene-Ozone Systems,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 1806–1817, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es001765+" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es001765+</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Shi, Z., Li, J., Huang, L., Wang, P., Wu, L., Ying, Q., Zhang, H., Lu, L.,
Liu, X., Liao, H., and Hu, J.: Source apportionment of fine particulate
matter in China in 2013 using a source-oriented chemical transport model,
Sci. Total Environ., 601–602, 1476–1487, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.019</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B., Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Ng, N. L., Petaja, T., Pierce, J. R., Rasch, P. J., Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Shilling, J., Smith, J. N., Thornton, J. A., Volkamer, R., Wang, J., Worsnop, D. R., Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing, Rev. Geophys., 55, 509–559, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M. K., Lane, T. E., Donahue, N. M., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: Effects of gas particle partitioning and aging of primary emissions on urban and regional organic aerosol concentrations, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D18301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009735" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009735</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Simon, H. and Bhave, P. V.: Simulating the Degree of Oxidation in Atmospheric Organic Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 331–339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202361w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es202361w</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, J., Liang, M., Shi, Z., Shen, F., Li, J., Huang, L., Ge, X., Chen, Q.,
Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., Chang, Y., Ji, D., Ying, Q., Zhang, H., Kota, S. H., and
Hu, J.: Investigating the PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentration growth processes during 2013–2016 in Beijing and Shanghai, Chemosphere, 221, 452–463, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.200" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.200</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Du, W., Fu, P., Wang, Q., Li, J., Ge, X., Zhang, Q., Zhu, C., Ren,
L., Xu, W., Zhao, J., Han, T., Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, Z.: Primary and
secondary aerosols in Beijing in winter: sources, variations and processes,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8309–8329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J., and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Tkacik, D. S., Presto, A. A., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Secondary
Organic Aerosol Formation from Intermediate-Volatility Organic Compounds:
Cyclic, Linear, and Branched Alkanes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 8773–8781, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301112c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es301112c</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Varutbangkul, V., Brechtel, F. J., Bahreini, R., Ng, N. L., Keywood, M. D.,
Kroll, J. H., Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., Lee, A., and Goldstein, A. H.:
Hygroscopicity of secondary organic aerosols formed by oxidation of cycloalkenes, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and related compounds, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 6, 2367–2388, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2367-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2367-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H. B., Tian, M., Li, X. H., Chang, Q., Cao, J. J., Yang, F. M., Ma, Y. L., and He, K. B.: Chemical Composition and Light Extinction Contribution of PM<sub>2:5</sub> in Urban Beijing for a 1-Year Period, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 15, 2200–2211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.04.0257" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.04.0257</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Jang, C., Phillips, S., and Wang, B.: Modeling intercontinental air pollution transport over the trans-Pacific region in 2001 using the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D04307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010807" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010807</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Wiedensohler, A., Cheng, Y. F., Nowak, A., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Berghof,
M., Birmili, W., Wu, Z. J., Hu, M., Zhu, T., Takegawa, N., Kita, K., Kondo, Y., Lou, S. R., Hofzumahaus, A., Holland, F., Wahner, A., Gunthe, S. S.,
Rose, D., Su, H., and Pöschl, U.: Rapid aerosol particle growth and increase of cloud condensation nucleus activity by secondary aerosol formation and condensation: A case study for regional air pollution in
northeastern China, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00G08, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010884" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010884</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Emmons, L. K., Al-Saadi, J.
A., Orlando, J. J., and Soja, A. J.: The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a
high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning,
Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 625–641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Woody, M. C., Baker, K. R., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Koo, B., and Pye, H. O. T.: Understanding sources of organic aerosol during CalNex-2010 using
the CMAQ-VBS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4081–4100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Ying, Q., Cureño, I. V., Chen, G., Ali, S., Zhang, H., Malloy, M., Bravo, H. A., and Sosa, R.: Impacts of Stabilized Criegee Intermediates, surface uptake processes and higher aromatic secondary organic aerosol yields on predicted PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in the Mexico City Metropolitan Zone, Atmos. Environ., 94, 438–447, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.056</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Ying, Q., Li, J., and Kota, S. H.: Significant Contributions of Isoprene to
Summertime Secondary Organic Aerosol in Eastern United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 7834–7842, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02514" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02514</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Hu, J., Kleeman, M., and Ying, Q.: Source apportionment of sulfate and nitrate particulate matter in the Eastern United States and effectiveness of emission control programs, Sci. Total Environ., 490, 171–181, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.064</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., He, K. B., Huo, H., Kannari, A., Klimont, Z., Park, I. S., Reddy, S., Fu, J. S., Chen, D., Duan, L., Lei,
Y., Wang, L. T., and Yao, Z. L.: Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B mission, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5131–5153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, B., Wang, S., Donahue, N. M., Jathar, S. H., Huang, X., Wu, W., Hao, J., and Robinson, A. L.: Quantifying the effect of organic aerosol aging and
intermediate-volatility emissions on regional-scale aerosol pollution in China, Sci. Rep., 6, 28815, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28815" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28815</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, D. F., Buchholz, A., Kortner, B., Schlag, P., Rubach, F., Fuchs, H.,
Kiendler-Scharr, A., Tillmann, R., Wahner, A., Watne, Å. K., Hallquist, M., Flores, J. M., Rudich, Y., Kristensen, K., Hansen, A. M. K., Glasius, M., Kourtchev, I., Kalberer, M., and Mentel, T. F.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity, droplet growth kinetics, and hygroscopicity of biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic aerosol (SOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
1105–1121, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1105-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1105-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, J., Qiu, Y., Zhou, W., Xu, W., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Xie, C.,
Wang, Q., Du, W., Worsnop, D. R., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhou, L., Ge, X., Fu,
P., Li, J., Wang, Z., Donahue, N. M., and Sun, Y.: Organic Aerosol Processing During Winter Severe Haze Episodes in Beijing, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 10248–10263, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030832" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030832</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., Tkacik, D. S., de Gouw, J. A., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., Borbon, A., and Robinson, A. L.: Intermediate-Volatility Organic Compounds: A Large Source of Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 13743–13750,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5035188" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es5035188</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., He, K. B., Wang, K., Zheng, G. J., Duan, F.
K., Ma, Y. L., and Kimoto, T.: Heterogeneous chemistry: a mechanism missing
in current models to explain secondary inorganic aerosol formation during
the January 2013 haze episode in North China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
2031–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
