<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-20-6973-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>MAX-DOAS measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and BrO<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> at the Mt.
Waliguan WMO GAW global baseline station<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> in the Tibetan Plateau</article-title><alt-title>MAX-DOAS measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and BrO at WLG</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{MAX-DOAS measurements of {$\chem{NO_{2}}$}, {$\chem{SO_{2}}$}, HCHO, and BrO at WLG}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. Ma et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Jianzhong</given-names></name>
          <email>majz@cma.gov.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9510-5432</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Dörner</surname><given-names>Steffen</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-5692</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Donner</surname><given-names>Sebastian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8868-167X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>Junli</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>Siyang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Junrang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Zhanfeng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Jianqiong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Peng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Guoqing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Pukite</surname><given-names>Janis</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Lampel</surname><given-names>Johannes</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7370-9342</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wagner</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          <email>thomas.wagner@mpic.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather &amp; CMA Key Laboratory of
Atmospheric Chemistry,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>CMA Meteorological Observation Centre, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Waliguan Observatory, Qinghai Meteorological Bureau, Xining, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Airyx GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Thomas Wagner (thomas.wagner@mpic.de) and Jianzhong Ma (majz@cma.gov.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>6973</fpage><lpage>6990</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>January</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9</day><month>May</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>13</day><month>May</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e269">Mt. Waliguan Observatory (WLG) is a World Meteorological Organization
(WMO) Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) global baseline station in China. WLG is
located at the northeastern part of the Tibetan Plateau (36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 100<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 3816 m a.s.l.) and is
representative of the pristine atmosphere over the Eurasian continent. We
made long-term ground-based multi-axis differential optical absorption
spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) measurements at WLG during the period 2012–2015. In
this study, we retrieve the differential slant column densities (dSCDs) and
estimate the tropospheric background mixing ratios of different trace gases,
including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and BrO, using the measured spectra at
WLG. Averaging of 10 original spectra is found to be an “optimum option” for
reducing both the statistical error of the spectral retrieval and systematic
errors in the analysis. The dSCDs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and BrO under
clear-sky and low-aerosol-load conditions are extracted from measured
spectra at different elevation angles at WLG. By performing radiative
transfer simulations with the model TRACY-2, we establish approximate
relationships between the trace gas dSCDs at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation angle
and the corresponding average tropospheric background volume mixing ratios.
Mixing ratios of these trace gases in the lower troposphere over WLG are
estimated to be in a range of about 7 ppt (January) to 100 ppt (May) for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, below 0.5 ppb for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, between 0.4 and 0.9 ppb for HCHO, and
lower than 0.3 ppt for BrO. The chemical box model simulations constrained
by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration from our MAX-DOAS measurements show that there
is a little net ozone loss (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the free-tropospheric
conditions and a little net ozone production (0.3 ppb d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the
boundary layer conditions over WLG during summertime. Our study provides
valuable information and data sets for further investigating tropospheric
chemistry in the background atmosphere and its links to anthropogenic
activities.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e439">Nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), sulfur dioxide
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), formaldehyde (HCHO), and bromine monoxide (BrO) are important
traces gases in tropospheric chemistry. Both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO participate
in the control of the strong oxidant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is an indicator of
photochemical smog, and the strongest atmospheric oxidizing agent OH, which
determines the lifetimes of many gaseous pollutants and greenhouse gases in
the atmosphere (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006; Ma et al., 2012; Lelieveld et
al., 2016). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are gaseous precursors of nitrate and
sulfate aerosols, and large amounts of these aerosols can result in haze
pollution and exert a strong negative radiative forcing on climate
change (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006; Forster et al., 2007; Ma et al., 2010).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are released from various anthropogenic<?pagebreak page6974?> emission
sources, e.g., the burning of coal, oil, gas, wood, and straw (Granier et
al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2012). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also emitted via natural processes
including lightning and microbial activities in soils
(Lee et al., 1997). Nitric oxide (NO) dominates
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> released from these sources, but it can be quickly converted to
nitrogen dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) by reaction with ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the
atmosphere. Natural sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the troposphere include volcanic
eruptions and the atmospheric oxidation of dimethyl sulfide (DMS:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SCH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) emitted from the ocean
(Dentener et al., 2006). HCHO in the
remote atmosphere is produced through the oxidation of methane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs), and it is also emitted
from anthropogenic combustion processes, biomass burning, and natural
vegetation (Stavrakou et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e628">Global emissions and atmospheric abundance of gaseous pollutants (e.g.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and aerosols have changed significantly over the past
few decades as revealed predominantly by satellite observations (e.g., De
Smedt et al., 2015; Xing et al., 2015; Bauwens et al., 2016; Fioletov et al.,
2016; Krotkov et al., 2016; Klimont et al., 2017; Li et al., 2017; Georgoulias
et al., 2019; Hammer et al., 2018; Ziemke et al., 2019). Worldwide
ground-based monitoring of the concentrations and trends of trace gases and
aerosols in the atmosphere is essential for the validation of and filling
gaps in satellite observations, in order to quantitatively assess the
impacts of atmospheric composition change on global air quality and climate
changes (Stohl et al., 2015; De Mazière et al., 2018). The
international global measurement networks have been set up sequentially over
the past decades to establish long-term databases for detecting changes and
trends in the chemical and physical state of the atmosphere. Among the
networks are the Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) program of the World
Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the Network for the Detection of
Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC), and in the latter measurements are
performed mainly by ground-based remote-sensing techniques
(De Mazière et al., 2018). In
contrast to Europe and North America, the stations under the networks in
Asia, especially in the remote areas, are very sparse.</p>
      <p id="d1e653">The China Global Atmosphere Watch Baseline Observatory at Mt. Waliguan (WLG)
is an in-land GAW baseline station affiliated with the WMO. The site (3816 m a.s.l.), located at the northeastern part of the Tibetan Plateau, is
representative of the pristine atmosphere over the Eurasian continent. Air
masses at WLG are highly representative of the remote free troposphere
(Ma et al., 2002a). Previous model simulations constrained by
measured mixing ratios of ozone and its precursors indicated a net
destruction of ozone at WLG in the summertime of 1996 (Ma et al.,
2002a). In contrast, new insights from model calculations based on more
recent measurements showed that ozone was net produced by in situ
photochemistry at WLG in late spring and summer of 2003
(Xue et al., 2013). The level of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plays a
key role in determining the sign of net ozone production in the remote
troposphere. However, it is not determined whether the difference in the
estimated net ozone production at WLG between the two studies is caused by
increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1996 to 2003 or by the uncertainties in the
measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similar to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, other reactive gases (e.g.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO) were also measured by filter or canister sampling methods
at WLG at irregular times (Mu et al., 2007; Meng et al., 2010; Lin et al.,
2013). It is necessary to start a new measurement program with advanced
techniques at WLG for the purpose of precisely monitoring the levels and
trends of atmospheric composition in the global pristine atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e711">Multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) has
the potential to retrieve the vertical distributions of trace gases and
aerosols in the immediate vicinity of the station from the scattered
sunlight measured at multiple elevation angles (Hönninger and Platt,
2002; Bobrowski et al., 2003; Van Roozendael et al., 2003; Hönninger et
al., 2004; Wittrock et al., 2004). As relatively simple and cheap
ground-based instrumentation, UV–visible MAX-DOAS will be included in
the certified NDACC measurement techniques for the observation of
lower-tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(De Mazière et al., 2018).
Successful measurement and retrieval of trace gases (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and HCHO) depend on various factors, including their molecular
absorption features and atmospheric abundances as well as the atmospheric
visibility and instrumental signal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> noise ratio. In contrast to extensive
ground-based measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and HCHO in rural and urban
areas worldwide, including highly polluted areas in eastern China (e.g.,
Ma et al., 2013; Hendrick et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014, 2017; Jin et al.,
2016), measurements of these trace gases by MAX-DOAS in
the remote background areas have been very sparse (Gomez et al.,
2014; Gil-Ojeda et al., 2015; Schreier et al., 2016). Gomez et al. (2014)
proposed a modified geometrical approach (MGA) to estimate
long-path-averaged mixing ratios of trace gases from mountain MAX-DOAS
measurements. A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level of 20 ppt, which is below the detection limit
of the in situ instrumentation, was observed (Gomez et al., 2014). The
MAX-DOAS technique has been applied to monitor the absolute column densities
and plumes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from large volcano eruptions (e.g., Lübcke et
al., 2016; Tulet et al., 2017), but measuring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the background free
troposphere still remains challenging.</p>
      <p id="d1e822">Bromine oxide (BrO) plays an important role in the catalytic destruction of
ozone in the remote troposphere (Platt and Hönninger,
2003; von Glasow and Crutzen, 2007). The earliest MAX-DOAS measurements were
focused on the retrieval of the mixing ratio levels and vertical profiles of
BrO in the boundary layer of Arctic, salt lake, and marine areas
(Hönninger and Platt, 2002; Stutz et al., 2002; Leser et al.,
2003; Frieß et al., 2004; Saiz-Lopez et al., 2004). Measurement results
showed that the BrO mixing ratio could reach up to 30 ppt in the Arctic and
10 ppt in the marine boundary<?pagebreak page6975?> layer (Platt and
Hönninger, 2003; Martin et al., 2009). BrO in the free troposphere at the
global scale was estimated to be at a level of 0.5–2 ppt based on
spaceborne, ground-based, and sounding measurements with the DOAS technique
(Harder et al., 1998; Fitzenberger et al., 2000; Richter et al., 2002; Van
Roozendael et al., 2002; Hendrick et al., 2007; Theys et al., 2007; Werner et
al., 2017). Model calculations indicated that inorganic bromine can
influence the chemical budgets of ozone in the free troposphere to a
considerable extent, reducing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration locally by up to 40 %
(von Glasow et al., 2004; Lary, 2005; Yang et al., 2005, 2010).
Until now, measurements of BrO and related species by ground-based MAX-DOAS
have been frequently carried out in the Arctic (Peterson et al.,
2015, 2017; Simpson et al., 2017; Luo et al., 2018), Antarctic
(Wagner et al., 2007b; Roscoe et al., 2012; Prados-Roman et al., 2018), and
coastal atmosphere (Coburn et al., 2011). To our
knowledge, no MAX-DOAS measurements have been reported for BrO on continents
other than in polar, salt lake, and coastal areas.</p>
      <p id="d1e836">We made long-term ground-based MAX-DOAS measurements at WLG during the
period 2012–2015. For this study we analyzed the measured spectra to
retrieve the free-tropospheric background mixing ratios of different trace
gases, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and BrO, from MAX-DOAS
measurements at WLG. Large effort was spent on the spectral analysis,
because in spite of the rather long atmospheric light paths at high altitude
the respective trace gas absorptions are close to or below the detection
limit. In Sect. 2, we give a description of the WLG measurement site, the
meteorological conditions, and the MAX-DOAS instrument used in the study.
Section 3 describes the method and settings we used in the spectral retrieval.
Section 4 introduces the radiative transfer simulations we performed for
in-depth analysis of measurement data. Section 5 describes the methods to
filter the measurement data for the clear-sky and low-aerosol-load
conditions. In Sect. 6, we provide the differential slant column density
values of the investigated trace gases and their corresponding tropospheric
background mixing ratios over WLG, and we compare the levels of these trace
gases reported by different studies. Conclusions are given in Sect. 7.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Field experiment</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>WLG station</title>
      <p id="d1e876">The WLG station is sited at the top of Mt. Waliguan (36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 100<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 3816 m a.s.l.), located in Qinghai Province
of China (Fig. 1a). It is one of the WMO GAW global baseline stations and
the only one in the hinterland of the Eurasian continent. Mt. Waliguan is an
isolated mountain with an elevation of about 600 m relative to the
surrounding landmass; it is surrounded by highland steppes, tundra, deserts,
and salt lakes (Fig. 1b). With a low population density of about 6 capitals km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and hardly any industry within 30 km, WLG has the advantage of being
rather isolated from industry, forest, and population centers. It is
relatively dry, windy, and short on precipitation with a typical continental
plateau climate (Tang et al., 1995). Xining City (the capital
of Qinghai Province, located about 90 km northeast of WLG) and Lanzhou City
(the capital of Gansu Province, located about 260 km away to its east) are
considered to be the nearest large pollution sources that may have impacts on
the WLG site. There are several high mountains (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.s.l.) between Xining and Mt. Waliguan. Total column ozone, surface ozone,
solar radiation, precipitation chemistry, greenhouse gases, aerosol optical
depth, and aerosol scattering and absorption coefficient together with basic
meteorological parameters have become operational measurement items at WLG
in succession since the year 1991 (Tang et al., 1995). In
addition to routine observations, intensive measurements and model analyses
were performed to investigate the regional and global representativeness of WLG
and the effects of chemical transformations and physical and transport
processes on various atmospheric compositions, e.g., surface ozone,
short-lifetime reactive gases (such as NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, other carbonyls, and non-methane
hydrocarbons – NMHCs), greenhouse gases, persistent organic pollutants,
metal and isotopes, and aerosols.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e989"><bold>(a)</bold> Position of Mt. Waliguan in East Asia. <bold>(b)</bold> Surrounding
topography within 100 km of WLG. <bold>(c)</bold> The MAX-DOAS instrument
installed at WLG.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6973/2020/acp-20-6973-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Meteorological conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e1014">We used the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)
reanalysis data to investigate meteorological conditions over the WLG site,
with data for 3–4 km altitude representing the ground level at WLG. As shown
in Fig. S1 in the Supplement, temperature is high in summer (around 283 K) and low in winter
(around 265 K), pressure is high in summer (around 643 hPa) and low in winter
(around 635 hPa), wind speed is low in summer (around 3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and high in
winter (around 5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and wind direction (0 means the wind is blowing from
the north) is from the southeast in summer (around 140<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and from the
west in winter (around 260<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). These seasonal variation
characteristics are similar to those in earlier years at the station as
reported in previous work (Tang et al., 1995). We evaluated the ECMWF
reanalysis data for 3–4 km altitude using meteorological data from in situ
measurements at the WLG station, and we found that the ECMWF data are in good
(temperature, pressure) and reasonable (wind speed and direction) agreement
with in situ data (see Fig. S2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>MAX-DOAS instrument</title>
      <p id="d1e1067">We started the ground-based MAX-DOAS measurement program at WLG on 26 September 2010. An automated and compact (13 cm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 cm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 cm) mini MAX-DOAS instrument from Hoffmann Messtechnik GmbH in Germany,
which had been used at the Gucheng site in the North China Plain
(Jin et al., 2016), was moved to and installed at WLG<?pagebreak page6976?> (Fig. 1c). This instrument is designed for the spectral analysis of scattered
sunlight and the application of the MAX-DOAS technique (Hönninger et
al., 2004). The same type of instrument was used in previous studies, e.g.,
in Beijing and the surrounding area (Ma et al., 2013; Jin et al., 2016).
The entrance optics, fiber-coupled spectrograph, and controlling electronics
are hermetically sealed in a metal box of about 3 L volume. A stepper
motor, mounted outside the box, can rotate the whole instrument to control
the elevation viewing angle, i.e., the angle between the horizontal and the
viewing direction, and thus it can scan vertically at different elevation
angles. The spectrograph covers a wavelength range of 290–437 nm and its
entrance slit has a width of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. A Sony ILX511 charged-coupled
device (CCD) detects the light in 2048 individual pixels. The whole
spectrograph is cooled by a Peltier stage to maintain a stable temperature
of the optical setup and to guarantee a small dark current signal. The
measurement process and spectra data logging are controlled by a laptop
using the MiniMax software package developed by Udo Frieß at the
Institute of Environmental Physics, the University of Heidelberg in Germany.</p>
      <p id="d1e1092">The instrument was mounted on a bracket, fixed on the building roof, at an
azimuth viewing direction exactly towards the north. After a winter of pilot
run, we added heating elements to the outside of the instrument so that the
temperature of the spectrograph could be kept at a stable but not very low
value, e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in winter. In other seasons, the temperature
of the optical setup was set at a higher value, typically 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, below the ambient temperature. Dark current spectra were measured using
10 000 ms and one scan and electronic offset spectra with 3 ms and 1000 scans. Measurements of these signal spectra were made generally month by
month or whenever the working temperature of the instrument was changed.
Over the pilot run period in the years 2010 and 2011, measurements had been
made with the same sequence of elevation angles as used at the Gucheng site
in the North China Plain (Jin et al., 2016), with no elevation
angles lower than 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> available. After the beginning of the year
2012, the elevation angles were set to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0,
1, 2, 3, 5, 10,
20, 30, and 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in a sequence.
Unfortunately, during the data analysis it turned out that the elevation
calibration was wrong by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. S3). Thus finally only a
few elevation angles from the original selection were found to be above the
horizon. After the correction by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> the remaining elevation
angles are 1, 6, 16, 26,
and 86<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. From the comparison between the measured and simulated
elevation angle dependencies of the different quantities (see Fig. S3), we estimate the accuracy of the corrected elevation angles to be
within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The exposure time for each elevation angle
was about 1 min. The data from 3 years of measurements over the
period April 2012 through April 2015 are used for this study.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Spectral retrieval</title>
      <p id="d1e1225">At the WLG site the atmospheric trace gas absorptions are usually rather
low. Thus the settings of the spectral analysis were optimized for low
detection limits. In general this can be achieved by
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>a.</label>
      <p id="d1e1230">co-adding of individual spectra,</p></list-item><list-item><label>b.</label>
      <p id="d1e1234">using rather broad spectral ranges, and</p></list-item><list-item><label>c.</label>
      <p id="d1e1238">selecting only spectra of high signal-to-noise ratio.</p></list-item></list>
Since at the WLG station different detector temperatures were used for
different time periods, the spectral analysis was performed with different
spectral calibrations (and corresponding sets of convoluted cross sections)
for each of these periods. In addition, the spectral analysis was carried
out with consistent settings for the different periods. In order to limit
the amount of work, only “long periods” that contained at least 60
measurement days were selected for the data analysis (see Table S1 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e1242">In order to achieve a large reduction of the statistical error, as much as
possible individual spectra should be averaged. However, systematic errors
tend to increase if an increasing number of spectra are averaged. In this
study we performed the analysis of spectra averaged from 10 original
spectra, for which a minimum of the fit error was found (see Fig. S4). In
this study individual measurements at 26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation of each
elevation sequence are used as Fraunhofer reference spectra, for the reasons
explained in  Sect. S3.2 in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e1254">The spectral ranges for the retrieval of the different trace gases were
determined in dedicated sensitivity studies (see  Sect. S3.3).
Examples of the spectral analyses are shown in Fig. 2. The errors of the
retrieved differential slant column densities (dSCDs) of the trace gas were
also estimated based on the sensitivity studies described in
Sect. S3.3. Table 1 summarizes the spectral fitting ranges and systematic and
random errors for the retrieved trace gas dSCDs. For all trace gases, the
overall error for individual measurements (averages of 10 original spectra)
is dominated by random errors. These errors, however, become much smaller if
a large number of measurements are averaged.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1261">Overview on the different fitting ranges and systematic and
random errors for the retrieved trace gas dSCDs (for spectra averaged from
10 original spectra). More details are found in the Supplement.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">HCHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">BrO</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wavelength range (nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">399–426</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">306–325</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">314–358</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">314–358</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Systematic error (molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Random error (molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1505">Fit result for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and BrO for a
spectrum (average of 10 original spectra) taken on 13 May 2013 (00:34–04:19) at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation. On this day, enhanced absorptions of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6973/2020/acp-20-6973-2020-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page6977?><sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Radiative transfer simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e1575">Similar to Gomez et al. (2014), we use the dSCDs from
MAX-DOAS measurements to estimate the mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
HCHO, and BrO at WLG in this study. The relationships between the dSCDs and
mixing ratios of these different trace gases are set up by radiative
transfer simulations using the radiative transfer model TRACY-2
(Wagner et al., 2007a). This
model allows us to explicitly consider the variation in the topography around
the measurement station (for more details on the effect of topography, see
Sect. 4.1 below). This option was, however, only used in one dimension (in
the viewing direction) in order to minimize the computational effort. The
variation in the surface terrain height and the results of the radiative
transfer simulations are illustrated in Fig. 3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1602"><bold>(a)</bold> Variation in the surface altitude in the viewing
direction (towards the north). The variation in the surface altitude across
the viewing direction was not explicitly considered to minimize the
computational effort. For the same reason, the topography “behind” the
instrument towards the south was also assumed to be flat. <bold>(b)</bold> Illustration of the results of the radiative transfer simulations for the
area between the instrument and the high mountain 30 km away. The
blue dot indicates the position of the instrument. The small red and yellow
dots indicate Rayleigh-scattering events and surface reflection of the
simulated solar photons, respectively.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=221.931496pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6973/2020/acp-20-6973-2020-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1616">The surface albedo was set to be 7.5 %. Sensitivity studies indicated that
the exact choice is not critical: simulations with high surface albedo
representative for snow surfaces yielded almost the same results. This
finding can be understood by the fact that the measurements and the
Fraunhofer reference spectra are affected by changes of the surface albedo
in the same way. Thus, for the retrieved dSCDs the effect of the surface
albedo cancels out. The aerosol extinction was varied, but it was assumed to be
constant between 2600 and 5600 m altitude. Different aerosol loads (aerosol optical depth (AOD)
between 0 and 0.5) were assumed. Here it should be noted that only a
fraction of 60 % of the total AOD is located above the instrument.</p>
      <p id="d1e1620">Simulations of trace gas air mass factors (AMFs) were performed for specific
viewing geometries for a whole diurnal cycle in January and July. These
months were chosen because they represent the most extreme viewing
geometries (winter and summer) during the whole year. From the derived
diurnal variations in the trace gas AMFs, daily averages for measurements
with a solar zenith angle (SZA) below 65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were calculated. For these calculations the
individual AMFs were weighted by the corresponding simulated intensities.
Finally, the simulated AMFs for a 26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation angle were
subtracted from the AMFs for the lower elevation angles, yielding the
respective differential AMFs (dAMFs). This procedure was applied in order to
calculate trace gas dAMFs which can be directly compared to the trace gas
dSCDs derived from the measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e1641">In order to relate the measured trace gas dSCDs to atmospheric trace gas
mixing ratios, assumptions about the vertical distributions of the trace
gases have to be made. The assumed trace gas profiles are described in
Sect. S4. Two types of input profiles are used. For the first
group of trace gases, the influence of the stratospheric absorptions can be
neglected. This is the case for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO, for which the
stratospheric amounts (except for strong volcanic eruptions) are very small
and can be neglected. Although for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the contribution from the
stratospheric absorption can be rather large, it is found that the
stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorptions are very similar for the different
elevation angles (see  Sect. S5.1), and the stratospheric
absorptions almost completely cancel out for the derived trace gas dSCDs
using sequential Fraunhofer reference spectra. Thus, the tropospheric
partial dSCD can be simulated independently from the stratospheric
absorptions and can be directly compared to the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dSCDs.</p>
      <p id="d1e1688">For BrO, the situation is different: since the stratospheric BrO profile is
located at rather low altitudes, the corresponding absorptions depend
substantially on the elevation angle. Thus they do not cancel out in the
retrieved BrO dSCDs. In fact, the dSCDs for low elevation angles can even
become negative (see  Sect. S5.2) due to the stratospheric BrO
absorptions. Therefore, for BrO the stratospheric and tropospheric profiles
of BrO always have to be considered simultaneously in the radiative transfer
simulations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1691">From the simulation results for a 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation angle (and low
aerosol load: AOD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1) approximate relationships between the trace gas
dSCDs (at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation angle) and the corresponding volume mixing
ratios are derived. They are given below for the different trace gases.
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e1721"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A dSCD of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to a mixing ratio of 60 ppt.</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e1762"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A dSCD of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to a mixing ratio of 33 ppt.</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <?pagebreak page6978?><p id="d1e1803">HCHO. A dSCD of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
corresponds to a mixing ratio of 55 ppt.</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e1834">BrO. A dSCD of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
corresponds to a mixing ratio of 0.6 ppt.</p></list-item></list>
Here it should be noted that for BrO the relationship is valid for the
increase in the BrO dSCD compared to a scenario with no BrO in the
troposphere (see Sect. S5.2 and Fig. S24). It should also be noted
that while in the simulations a constant mixing ratio throughout the
atmosphere was assumed, the measured trace gas dSCDs are mainly sensitive to
the trace gas concentrations in the atmospheric layers close to the
instrument. Thus the derived trace gas mixing ratios are most representative
for the free troposphere in the altitude range between about 4 and 5 km.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Effects of topography</title>
      <p id="d1e1873">We investigated the effect of the surface topography in more detail. In
addition to the setup with the “true” topography (Fig. 3), we also
performed simulations with flat surfaces at sea level or 3700 m altitude,
because these options might be used as alternative scenarios for radiative
transfer models without the option to consider the true topography. In all
three setups the atmospheric properties and the altitude of the detector
(3800 m) are kept the same. In Fig. 4 the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AMFs for the simulations
with flat surfaces are plotted versus the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AMFs for the true surface
topography. While the results for a flat surface at 3700 m are very similar
to those for the true topography, the results for a flat surface at sea
level show systematically higher values. With increasing aerosol load these
differences even increase. This finding can become very important for the
interpretation of measurements<?pagebreak page6979?> in mountainous environments if no radiative
transfer simulations considering the true topography are available. However,
this finding needs further investigations, especially if an instrument is
operated on a more isolated mountain. In such cases, the agreement between
simulations with true topography and flat surface at high altitude might be
worse. Further studies should also investigate the effects for trace gases
with different altitude profiles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1900">Comparison of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AMFs for different choices
of the surface topography. Results for flat surfaces at sea level (blue) or
3700 m (red) are plotted versus the results for a realistic surface
topography (see Fig. 3). <bold>(a, b)</bold> Results for winter and
<bold>(c, d)</bold> results for summer. <bold>(a, c)</bold> Results for simulation
without aerosols and <bold>(b, d)</bold> results for an AOD of 0.1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6973/2020/acp-20-6973-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1932">Besides the simulation of the air mass factors, we also compared the results
for other simulated quantities: in Fig. 5 the dependence of the simulated
radiance (top) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AMF (center) and color index (bottom) is shown as a
function of the elevation angle (including negative elevation angles).
Again, the results for the true topography and the flat surface at 3700 m
altitude are very similar, while the results for a flat surface at sea level
are systematically different. The results of these comparisons indicate that
for our measurements the assumption of a flat surface at the approximate
altitude of the surrounding terrain is a very good approximation for the
true surface topography. However, for zero and negative elevation angles,
the consideration of the true topography might become important. Here it is
interesting to note that these differences will probably increase for
measurements in other mountainous scenarios, especially for more measurements
at isolated mountains. These effects should also be investigated in more
detail in future studies.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1949">Simulation results of the radiance <bold>(a)</bold>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
AMF <bold>(b)</bold>, and color index <bold>(c)</bold> for different
choices of the surface topography as function of the elevation angle
(including negative elevation angles). Simulation results are for summer
noontime (see also Fig. S3).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=147.954331pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6973/2020/acp-20-6973-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Identification of measurements made under cloudy-sky conditions and high aerosol loads</title>
      <p id="d1e1988">For the quantitative interpretation of the measurements, they are compared
to results from radiative transfer simulations. These simulations are
performed for well-defined, particularly cloud-free conditions. Thus only
measurements for such conditions have to be selected. Moreover, to take advantage of the high sensitivity of the MAX-DOAS measurements, situations
with low aerosol load and thus high visibility have to be selected. The
following two subsections describe how measurements under cloudy conditions
and high aerosol loads are identified.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Cloud filter</title>
      <p id="d1e1998">Cloudy-sky conditions can be identified and classified by different
quantities (see, e.g., Gielen et al., 2014; Wagner et al., 2014, 2016). In this study, to minimize the computational effort, we only use
the color index (CI) measured in the zenith direction (note that the
measurements in the zenith direction were not used for trace gas retrievals
because of suspected<?pagebreak page6980?> direct sun impact). We chose the wavelength pair 330
and 390 nm:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M129" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">signal</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">330</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">signal</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">390</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Moreover, in order to minimize the potential effects of instrument
degradation, the absolute value of the CI is not used for the cloud
classification. Instead, two derived quantities are calculated.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>5.1.1</label><title>The temporal smoothness indicator (TSI)</title>
      <p id="d1e2042">The TSI is derived from the zenith measurements. If the CI between
subsequent zenith measurements changes rapidly, this indicates the presence
of clouds. The TSI is calculated according to the following formula:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M130" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TSI</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the number of an elevation sequence. For clear sky (and
homogenous cloud cover) the TSI is small. For broken clouds the TSI is
large.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>5.1.2</label><title>The spread (SP) of the CI for one elevation sequence</title>
      <p id="d1e2111">The SP is calculated as the difference between the maximum and minimum of
the CI for a selected elevation sequence:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M132" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate the maximum and minimum CI of
the considered elevation sequence. For clear sky, the SP is large; for
(homogenous) clouds the SP is low.</p>
      <p id="d1e2188">Based on the calculated TSI and SP the cloud situation of an individual
elevation sequence is classified as clear sky, broken clouds, or continuous
clouds according to the following thresholds:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>a.</label>
      <p id="d1e2193">clear sky – TSI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.012 and SP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15,</p></list-item><list-item><label>b.</label>
      <p id="d1e2211">broken clouds – TSI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.012,</p></list-item><list-item><label>c.</label>
      <p id="d1e2222">continuous clouds – TSI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.012 and SP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15.</p></list-item></list>
Note that for cases (a) and (c) both TSIs (at the beginning and the end of the
elevation sequence) have to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.012</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; for case (b) the condition
is fulfilled if one of both TSIs is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.012</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Aerosol filter</title>
      <p id="d1e2269">For the low elevation angles the atmospheric visibility and thus the length
of the light path depend strongly on the aerosol load. Thus measurements
with high aerosol loads have decreased sensitivity to the trace gas
absorptions and thus have to be identified and removed from further
processing. For that purpose the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption is used
(Wagner et al., 2004; Lampel et al., 2018). In the following, a threshold
for the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dSCD at a 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation angle of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is used, which
corresponds to an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dAMF of 1.2 (see Fig. S27). This threshold
represents an AOD of about 0.1 at 360 nm.</p>
      <p id="d1e2351">In Fig. S28 the seasonal variation in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dSCDs at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
elevation is shown. High values are typically found in winter, indicating low
AOD. In other seasons smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dSCDs are found, indicating higher AOD.
This seasonal dependence is in good agreement with measurements of the AOD
(Che et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Summary of sky conditions</title>
      <?pagebreak page6981?><p id="d1e2393">In Fig. 6 the seasonal variation in the sky conditions is shown. It is
derived by applying the cloud and aerosol classification algorithms
described above. The statistics is based on the number of observations (at
1, 6, or 16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation angle) of spectra
averaged from 10 original spectra (April 2012–April 2015). Only
measurements with more than 800 scans are considered. The basic colors
indicate the cloud properties (clear, broken clouds, continuous clouds). The
full or light colors indicate observations with low or high aerosol loads,
respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2407">Absolute <bold>(a)</bold> and relative <bold>(b)</bold>
frequency of the different sky conditions. The statistics is based on the
number of observations at a 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation angle of spectra averaged
from 10 original spectra (April 2012–April 2015). Only measurements with
more than 800 scans are considered. The basic colors indicate the cloud
properties (clear, broken clouds, continuous clouds). The dark or light
colors indicate observations with low or high aerosol loads, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6973/2020/acp-20-6973-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2431">While the absolute frequency of clear-sky observations (low and high aerosol
load) stays almost constant over the year, the relative fraction changes
strongly with the highest probability of clear-sky observations in winter
and the lowest probability in summer. The relative fraction of low aerosol
cases is largest in winter. The corresponding seasonal frequency plots for
the different trace gas analyses (after application of the individual rms
filters) are shown in Fig. S29. While the absolute amount of valid data is
different for the different analyses, the seasonal frequency is almost the
same.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1">
  <label>6.1</label><title>Seasonal means of the dSCDs</title>
      <p id="d1e2450">In Fig. 7 (left) time series of daily averages of the individual trace gas
dSCDs for a 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation angle are shown. On the right side, the
corresponding monthly mean values are shown. In Fig. 8 the seasonal cycles
for all elevation angles (1, 6, 16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are
shown for clear sky. In this figure, the systematic uncertainties of
the trace gas dSCDs are also indicated by the blue dotted lines. The systematic
uncertainties can be regarded as indicators for the lower bounds of the
detection limit (which might be reached if a large number of measurements are
averaged). For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and HCHO, approximate mixing ratios
derived for the measurements at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation angles are also indicated
by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes at the right side (see Sect. 4). The results for broken clouds
are similar to those for clear sky (see Fig. S30). This is useful
information to confirm the results for clear sky, since for broken clouds,
the atmospheric light paths are often similar to those for clear sky.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2512">Left: time series of daily averaged trace gas dSCDs at
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation for clear-sky spectra and low aerosol load from 2012
to 2015, with “Jan 12” referring to “1 Jan 2012”. Right:
corresponding seasonal averages.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6973/2020/acp-20-6973-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2532">Seasonal means of the trace gas dSCDs for different
elevation angles for clear sky and low aerosol load. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and HCHO the right axes represent the approximate mixing ratios for
measurements at a 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation angle. The blue dotted lines indicate
the systematic uncertainties, which can be considered the lower bound of the
detection limit.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6973/2020/acp-20-6973-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2573">The main findings are as follows.
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label>
      <p id="d1e2578">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO higher dSCDs are found for lower elevation angles
(see also Fig. S20), and this indicates enhanced trace gas concentrations in
the lower troposphere (at least in the atmospheric layers between about 4
and 5 km a.s.l.) compared to the upper troposphere.</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label>
      <p id="d1e2593">The highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are found in a period from April to June,
most likely due to the influence of long-range transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its
reservoir from both human and natural sources (Ma et al., 2002b; Wang et
al., 2006).</p></list-item><list-item><label>iii.</label>
      <p id="d1e2619">For BrO the opposite dependence is found, and this is mainly caused by
the influence of stratospheric BrO (see Sect. S5.2).</p></list-item><list-item><label>iv.</label>
      <p id="d1e2623">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> no clear elevation dependence is found (the values are
below the detection limit).</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2">
  <label>6.2</label><title>Estimation of a free-tropospheric background mixing ratio from the dSCDs</title>
      <p id="d1e2645">In this section the lower tropospheric mixing ratios of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and BrO at WLG are estimated based on the respective dSCDs
at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 8) and the relationships between the dSCDs and the
tropospheric mixing ratios (Sect. 4).</p>
      <p id="d1e2679">Below are our estimates.
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e2684"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dSCDs at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (January) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (May) correspond to mixing ratios between
about 7 (January) and 100 ppt (May).</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e2761"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dSCDs at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> correspond to mixing ratios below 0.5 ppb.</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e2811"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dSCDs at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (winter) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (summer) correspond to mixing ratios between about 0.4 (winter) and 0.9 ppb (summer).</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e2885"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. From the dSCDs at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> an upper limit for a
troposphere BrO mixing ratio of 0.3 ppt is derived (see Sect. S8).</p></list-item></list>
It should again be noted that while in the simulations a constant mixing
ratio throughout the atmosphere was assumed, the measured trace gas dSCDs
are mainly sensitive to the trace gas concentrations in the atmospheric
layers close to the instrument. Thus the derived trace gas mixing ratios are
most representative for the free troposphere in the altitude range between
about 4 and 5 km.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3">
  <label>6.3</label><title>Comparisons of measured results with previous studies</title>
      <p id="d1e2913">Measurements of the very reactive trace gases are very scarce at remote
sites like WLG. Table 2 summarizes the mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
HCHO, and BrO at WLG measured by MAX-DOAS presented in this study in
comparison to those recorded in other studies using different methods.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2941">Comparisons between trace gas mixing ratios at WLG and
those recorded in other remote areas at low latitudes.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Method</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppt)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">HCHO (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">BrO (ppt)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2012–2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAX-DOAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7–100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.4–0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAX-DOAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">spring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAX-DOAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 1996</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SP–ICG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Ma et al. (2002a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 1996</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SP–ICG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Ma et al. (2002a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SP–SPM–ICG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">600</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Meng et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1997–2009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SP–ICG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Lin et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">summer 2006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CLS–PhC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">280</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Xue et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">summer 2003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CLS–modeling</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">110</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Xue et al., 2013</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aug–Sep 2005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SGC–HPLC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Mu et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dec 2005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SGC–HPLC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Mu et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Izaña</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">summer 2011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAX-DOAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Gomez et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Izaña</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2011–2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAX-DOAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20–45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Gil-Ojeda et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zugspitze</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Feb–Jul 2003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAX-DOAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60–100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.26–0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Schreier et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pico Espejo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2004–2009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAX-DOAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9–16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.50–0.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Schreier et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Atlantic MBL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oct 2000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SMAX-DOAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24–200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Leser et al. (2003)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kiruna (Sweden)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aug 1998 &amp;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Balloon DOAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.3–1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Fitzenberger et al. (2000)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Feb 1999</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mace Head</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aug 2002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LP-DOAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–6.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Saiz-Lopez et al. (2004)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Atlantic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan–Feb 2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ship- and aircraft-based</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0–2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Volkamer et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAX-DOAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page6983?><p id="d1e3581">The passive sampling method was used to measure the weekly and monthly mean
mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at WLG (Ma et al., 2002a; Meng et
al., 2010; Lin et al., 2013). The monthly mean mixing ratios and standard
deviations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at WLG were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.022</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.010</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb in January and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppt in July for the year 1996 (Ma et al., 2002a).
For the measurement in 1996, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was sampled with filter packs (SP)
with exposure times of typically 3–5 d and then analyzed by ion
chromatography (ICG) equipment (Yu et al., 1997). During the
measurement experiment in 2008, the samplers were exposed about 10 d in a
month. The extracted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> samples (Ogawa passive samplers) were analyzed
using a spectrophotometer (SPM) while the extracted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were
analyzed by ICG (Meng et al., 2010). The average mixing ratios
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at WLG in 2008 typically varied in the ranges of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, respectively (Meng et
al., 2010). Long-term continuous measurements, by filter sampling with
exposure times of 3–5 d followed by ICG chemical analysis, showed that
the mixing ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied typically in a range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb at WLG from 1997 to 2009 (Lin et al., 2013). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels obtained from this study are in accordance with those recorded by
Ma et al. (2002a), but an order of magnitude lower than reported
by Meng et al. (2010). The time differences between
Meng et al. (2010) and the other two studies seem not to be the
main cause. The sampling filters were likely to be polluted by local human
activities, such as increasing frequency of occasional cars and vans to the
station, which could not be excluded from the recording due to their long
exposure time. The level of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might also be overestimated by
Meng et al. (2010) considering that there had not been a
significant increasing trend for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at WLG during 1997–2009
(Lin et al., 2013). It can be deduced that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level
from this study is reasonable with comparison to the results from
Lin et al. (2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e3791">The daytime NO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios at WLG in the summer of 2006 were
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppt and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, respectively, as measured by
chemiluminescence (CLS) analyzer coupled with a photolytic converter (PhC)
(Xue et al., 2011). Also measured by CLS, the
daytime average NO mixing ratios at WLG were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.072</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.079</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb in the
late spring and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.047</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.032</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb in the summer of 2003 (Wang et
al., 2006; Xue et al., 2013). Assuming the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (i.e., 3.9)
as in the summer of 2006, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios at WLG would be
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb in the late spring and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb in the
summer of 2003. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels obtained from the CLS method are much
higher than those from MAX-DOAS presented in this study. This can be
explained by the fact that in situ measurements at WLG are strongly
influenced during the daytime by the underlying boundary layer, where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are high due to soil emissions and other occasional
pollution sources. In contrast, the upwelling air masses have a relatively
small influence on the MAX-DOAS measurements, which represent a long optical
path.</p>
      <p id="d1e3926">The ambient concentrations of carbonyl compounds were measured at WLG in
2005, by using the silica gel cartridge–high-performance liquid
chromatography (SGC–HPLC) method. The means and standard deviations of HCHO
mixing ratios were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb in August–September and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb in December (Mu et al., 2007). The HCHO mixing ratios
obtained by the SGC–HPLC method are nearly an order of magnitude higher than
those by MAX-DOAS presented in this study. Mu et al. (2007) reported
that the variability of HCHO concentrations was significant (by a factor of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) if the air samples were collected at different places at the
site. HCHO forms through oxidation reactions associated with methane and
various NMVOCs, most of which (e.g., isoprene) have high spatial variability
in abundance due to short lifetimes and thus can influence local HCHO
concentrations significantly. Therefore, isoprene and other very active
NMVOCs emitted from natural vegetation can accumulate near the surface and
result in high levels of HCHO by oxidation. While in situ sampling methods as
used by Mu et al. (2007)<?pagebreak page6984?> measured HCHO on the ground level within
the boundary layer, MAX-DOAS measured the HCHO mixing ratios at a large
scale, partly including the free troposphere. The model sensitivity experiment
shows that the HCHO mixing ratio is larger in the boundary layer than in the
free troposphere over WLG (see Sect. 6.4).</p>
      <p id="d1e3963">Also listed in Table 2 are the levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and BrO measured by
MAX-DOAS in other remote areas at middle and subtropical latitudes. Note
that to our knowledge, no results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were reported in those
studies. Our purpose here is to show what low levels of these gases, BrO in
particular, had been detected by MAX-DOAS in these remote regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e3988">Gomez et al. (2014) retrieved the gas concentrations at a
very long horizontal path of over 60 km from high-mountain MAX-DOAS
measurements at the Izaña Atmospheric Observatory (28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>29<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 2373 m a.s.l.) on the Canary Islands using
the modified geometrical approach (MGA). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were
within the range of 20–40 ppt in the summer of 2011
(Gomez et al., 2014).
Gil-Ojeda et al. (2015) applied the same
technique to a longer data set obtained at the same station and showed that
the free-tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios varied in the range of 20–45 ppt between 2011 and 2013, with the lowest values in winter and highest
values in summer. MAX-DOAS measurements were also performed at Zugspitze,
Germany (47.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 11<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 2650 m a.s.l.), during
February–July 2003 and Pico Espejo, Venezuela (8.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
71<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 4765 m a.s.l.), from March 2004 to February 2009. Based on
the MGA method, the monthly mean mixing ratios of free-tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
were estimated to be in the range of 60–100 ppt at Zugspitze and 8.5–15.5 ppt
at Pico Espejo. The values for HCHO were in the range of 500–950 ppt at
Zugspitze and 255–385 ppt at Pico Espejo
(Schreier et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e4097">BrO was detected directly in the midlatitude marine environment for the
first time, in the region north of the Canary Islands (around 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), when a research cruise including ship MAX-DOAS
(SMAX-DOAS) measurements was carried out over the Atlantic Ocean in October
2000 (Leser et al., 2003). Typical levels of BrO in the
marine lower troposphere were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3.6 ppt in most cases, and
upper limits of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for clean air in the Atlantic west of Africa were
observed to be 24 to 100 ppt (Leser et al., 2003). BrO was
measured by long-path MAX-DOAS (LP-MAX-DOAS) at the Mace Head observatory on
the west coast of Ireland (53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) in August 2002. The BrO mixing ratios were shown to vary from below the detection
limit (0.8 ppt) at night to a maximum daytime concentration of 6.5 ppt,
indicating that significant bromine activation occurs over the open ocean
(Saiz-Lopez et al., 2004). Tropospheric BrO profiles
over the remote Atlantic were obtained by aircraft- and ship-based MAX-DOAS
measurements by Volkamer et al. (2015). In the marine boundary layer
(MBL) mixing ratios close to zero were obtained, which increase with
altitude in the free troposphere. In the middle troposphere mixing ratios up
to 1 ppt were found. Fitzenberger et al. (2000) derived BrO profiles from
balloon-borne measurements in Kiruna (Sweden) with mixing ratios up to about
1 ppt in the free troposphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e4176">It can be seen that the levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at WLG derived from this study
are comparable to those measured by MAX-DOAS<?pagebreak page6985?> in other remote areas. However,
the upper limit for the free-tropospheric mixing ratios of BrO at WLG (about
0.3 ppt) derived from this study is lower than those observed under the MBL
conditions at the same latitude band.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS4">
  <label>6.4</label><title>Simulations of chemical ozone production and OH concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e4198">We performed chemical box model simulations to evaluate the effects of the
variability and trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels on the photochemistry and oxidation
capacity of the background atmosphere over WLG. The model, named NCAR's
Master Mechanism (MM), was originally developed by Madronich and
Calvert (1989) and applied to estimate the chemical budget for ozone at WLG
by Ma et al. (2002a). For this study, we simulated the net ozone
production and OH in summer for the free-tropospheric conditions, which were
characterized by air masses with relatively high ozone and low water vapor
and by excluding very-short-lifetime non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs)
like isoprene, as described by Ma et al. (2002a). All
simulations were constrained by the same diurnal cycles of temperature,
water vapor, and ozone and fixed NMHC values measured at WLG, as reported
in the work of Ma et al. (2002a). Three different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels
were considered and fixed to constrain the simulations, with scenarios
described below.
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e4225"><italic>M02</italic>. The daily average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio is 48 ppt, corresponding to
the result derived by the SP method from Ma et al. (2002a).</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e4242"><italic>M20</italic>. The daytime (daily) average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio is 60 ppt (70 ppt),
corresponding to the value derived by MAX-DOAS from this study.</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e4259"><italic>X13</italic>. The daily average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio is 110 ppt, corresponding to
the result derived by the CLS method from Xue et
al. (2013).</p></list-item></list>
Figure 9 shows the diurnal variations in the net ozone production (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and OH concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at WLG simulated by the model constrained by
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations corresponding to these three <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scenarios.
Among the three <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, both the daytime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are the smallest for M02 and the largest for X13. There occurs a net ozone
destruction under the M02 condition and net ozone production under the X13
condition, with daily average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1.8 ppb d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. These findings are qualitatively in agreement with the results
of  Ma et al. (2002a) and Xue et al. (2013), although the latter was derived under different NMHC and water
vapor conditions. Under the M20 condition, while net ozone production is
found to occur instantaneously in the early morning and late afternoon,
ozone is still slightly net destructed over the entire day with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e4439"><bold>(a)</bold> Simulated daily variations in the net ozone
production rates and <bold>(b)</bold> in the OH concentrations and mixing ratios for
the free-tropospheric conditions over WLG in summer at different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6973/2020/acp-20-6973-2020-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4464">As mentioned above, the free-tropospheric conditions, which generally have
less ozone production with respect to the planetary boundary conditions at
WLG as characterized by Ma et al. (2002a), are taken into
account. We also made a sensitivity test, for which the short-lived NMHC
conditions from Ma et al. (2002a) were added to the M20
conditions (denoted as M20-BL). For the scenario with the added NMHC
species, high intermediate oxidation products were predicted for the
planetary boundary condition (M20-BL) compared to the free-tropospheric
condition (M20). For example, the daily average HCHO mixing ratio was
simulated to be 1.9 ppb in M20-BL and 0.4 ppb in M20. Compared to the M20
condition, the instantaneous net ozone production and destruction are more
in balance over the course of the day under the M20-BL condition, with a
daily average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.3 ppb d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that ozone is
slightly net produced.</p>
      <p id="d1e4495">We also performed an additional model simulation (denoted as M20-BrO, not
shown in the figure) to investigate the effects of bromine chemistry on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH in the free troposphere over WLG, by including the gas-phase
bromine chemical mechanism provided by the MM. All input variable values
were the same as in M20, except that the simulation was constrained with a
daily maximum BrO mixing ratio of 0.3 ppt (occurring around noon) for
M20-BrO. The result shows a daily net ozone destruction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, slightly lower than that for M20. Compared to M20, the OH
concentrations in the daily cycle decrease in M20-BrO, with the peak
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for M20 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for M20-BrO. The perturbation of BrO
on the net ozone production estimated here (i.e., about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
may be considered negligible considering that the variability of other
environmental conditions, such as the NMHCs and water vapor concentrations,
can have larger effects on the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value (Ma et
al., 2002a).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>7</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4647">We made long-term ground-based MAX-DOAS measurements at the WLG WMO GAW
global baseline station during the period 2012–2015. For this study we
analyzed the measured spectra to estimate the tropospheric background mixing
ratios of different trace gases, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,<?pagebreak page6986?> HCHO, and BrO,
from MAX-DOAS measurements at WLG.</p>
      <p id="d1e4672">For the spectral retrieval, we find that averaging of spectra increases the
signal-to-noise ratio and thus reduces the statistical error of the spectral
retrieval on the one hand, and systematic errors caused by imperfect correction
of the Ring effect tend to increase if an increasing number of spectra are
averaged on the other hand. Averages of 10 original spectra have been proven to
be an “optimum option” in the spectral analysis for this study. We
determined the settings and spectral ranges for the retrieval of the
different trace gases by a large number of dedicated sensitivity studies. We
performed radiative transfer simulations with the radiative transfer model (RTM) TRACY-2, which allows us
to explicitly consider the variation in the topography around the
measurement station in the viewing direction. From the simulation results,
approximate relationships between the trace gas dSCDs (at the 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
elevation angle and low aerosol load: AOD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1) and the corresponding
volume mixing ratios are derived. We used the temporal variation and the
spread of the color index (CI) derived from our MAX-DOAS measurements to
select measurement data for clear sky and low aerosol load, and then we
retrieved the corresponding daily averages and seasonal cycles of the trace
gas dSCDs at elevation angles of 1, 6, and 16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4700">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO, higher dSCDs are found for lower elevation angles than
for higher elevation angles, indicating higher trace gas concentrations in
the lower troposphere compared to the upper troposphere over WLG. For BrO
the opposite dependence is found, reflecting the influence of stratospheric
BrO. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> no clear elevation dependence is found. The highest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dSCDs are found in a period from April to June, most likely due to
the long-range transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its reservoirs to WLG. From the
dSCDs at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation, mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the lower
troposphere over WLG are estimated to be between about 7 ppt (January) and
100 ppt (May), and mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fall below 0.5 ppb. Mixing
ratios of HCHO range between about 0.4 (winter) and 0.9 ppb (summer). These
mixing ratios are most representative for atmospheric layers between about 4
and 5 km. Mixing ratios of BrO are estimated to be smaller than 0.3 ppt.
Retrieving BrO in the continental background troposphere remains a
challenge, which should be further addressed in future studies.</p>
      <p id="d1e4779">The summertime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level at WLG derived by MAX-DOAS from this study
(M20) is higher than the result from in situ measurement by the SP method in
1996 (Ma et al., 2002a) (M02) but lower than that by the CLS
method in 2003 (Xue et al., 2013) (X13) and 2006
(Xue et al., 2011). The chemical box model
simulations show that the daily net ozone production in the free troposphere
over WLG is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1.8, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels of
M02, X13, and M20, respectively. It is most likely that the ozone production
over WLG increased from 1996 to the 2000s and 2010s. The model sensitivity
simulation indicates a negligible effect of bromine chemistry on the ozone
production in the background troposphere, with a perturbation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over WLG. Within this study, existing retrieval strategies for
MAX-DOAS measurements were adapted and improved for measurements at high-altitude stations and in environments with low trace gas abundances. These
improvements will be important to similar studies and include the following
main aspects.
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>a.</label>
      <p id="d1e4861">In order to achieve low detection limits, spectra were pre-filtered and
averaged to minimize the spectral noise. Spectral interferences between
different absorbers were investigated and minimized using measured and
synthetic spectra. Maximum wide spectral ranges were used to make the best use
of the information content.</p></list-item><list-item><label>b.</label>
      <p id="d1e4865">Radiative transfer simulations were performed taking  into account the
surface topography. While it turned out for this study that the effects of
surface topography were not very important, this might be different for
measurements in other mountainous scenarios, especially for measurements on
isolated mountains. These effects should be investigated in more detail in
future studies.</p></list-item><list-item><label>c.</label>
      <p id="d1e4869">At high-mountain sites the elevation angle dependence of stratospheric
absorptions can become important, especially for trace gases like BrO which
have their concentration maximum close to the tropopause.</p></list-item></list>
An obvious conclusion from our study is that future measurements should be
performed with more elevation angles and with instruments that have a better
signal-to-noise ratio.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4877">The spectral analysis and model simulation results here are available upon
request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4880">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6973-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6973-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4889">JM and TW designed the study. JM, JJ, JG, ZZ, JW, PL, and GZ contributed to
the measurements. TW, JM, SDö, SDo, JJ, SC, JP, and JL
contributed to the data analyses. TW and JM prepared the manuscript with
consent by all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4895">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4901">This article is part of the special issue “Study of ozone, aerosols and radiation over the Tibetan Plateau (SOAR-TP) (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><?pagebreak page6987?><p id="d1e4908">We thank all the staff from WLG for assisting measurement work.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4913">This research has been supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (grant no. 2018YFC1505703), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41275140 and 41875146), and the China Meteorological Administration (grant no. GYHY201106023).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication were covered by the Max Planck Society.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4924">This paper was edited by Tao Wang and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bauwens, M., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M., van der Werf, G. R., Wiedinmyer, C., Kaiser, J. W., Sindelarova, K., and Guenther, A.: Nine years of global hydrocarbon emissions based on source inversion of OMI formaldehyde observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10133–10158, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10133-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10133-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bobrowski, N., Honninger, G., Galle, B., and Platt, U.: Detection of bromine
monoxide in a volcanic plume, Nature, 423, 273–276, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Che, H., Wang, Y., and Sun, J.: Aerosol optical properties at Mt. Waliguan Observatory, China, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6004–6009, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.050" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.050</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Coburn, S., Dix, B., Sinreich, R., and Volkamer, R.: The CU ground MAX-DOAS instrument: characterization of RMS noise limitations and first measurements near Pensacola, FL of BrO, IO, and CHOCHO, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2421–2439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2421-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-2421-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>De Mazière, M., Thompson, A. M., Kurylo, M. J., Wild, J. D., Bernhard, G., Blumenstock, T., Braathen, G. O., Hannigan, J. W., Lambert, J.-C., Leblanc, T., McGee, T. J., Nedoluha, G., Petropavlovskikh, I., Seckmeyer, G., Simon, P. C., Steinbrecht, W., and Strahan, S. E.: The Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC): history, status and perspectives, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4935–4964, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4935-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-4935-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dentener, F., Kinne, S., Bond, T., Boucher, O., Cofala, J., Generoso, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Hoelzemann, J. J., Ito, A., Marelli, L., Penner, J. E., Putaud, J.-P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., van der Werf, G. R., and Wilson, J.: Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750 prescribed data-sets for AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4321–4344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>De Smedt, I., Stavrakou, T., Hendrick, F., Danckaert, T., Vlemmix, T., Pinardi, G., Theys, N., Lerot, C., Gielen, C., Vigouroux, C., Hermans, C., Fayt, C., Veefkind, P., Müller, J.-F., and Van Roozendael, M.: Diurnal, seasonal and long-term variations of global formaldehyde columns inferred from combined OMI and GOME-2 observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12519–12545, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12519-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12519-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fioletov, V. E., McLinden, C. A., Krotkov, N., Li, C., Joiner, J., Theys, N., Carn, S., and Moran, M. D.: A global catalogue of large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources and emissions derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11497–11519, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11497-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-11497-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fitzenberger, R., Bösch, H., Camy, Peyret, C., Chipperfield, M. P.,
Harder, H., Platt, U., Sinnhuber, B. M., Wagner, T., and Pfeilsticker, K.:
First profile measurements of tropospheric BrO, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27,
2921–2924, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000gl011531" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000gl011531</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Forster, P., Ramasway, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D.
W., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D. C., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R.,
Raga, G., Schulz, M., and Van Dorlando, R.: Changes in atmospheric
constituents and in radiative forcing, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical
Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon,
S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquist, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M.,
and Miller, H. L., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York,
USA, 129–234, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frieß, U., Hollwedel, J., König-Langlo, G., Wagner, T., and Platt,
U.: Dynamics and chemistry of tropospheric bromine explosion events in the
Antarctic coastal region, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D06305,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004133" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd004133</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Georgoulias, A. K., van der A, R. J., Stammes, P., Boersma, K. F., and Eskes, H. J.: Trends and trend reversal detection in 2 decades of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6269–6294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6269-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6269-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gielen, C., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Pinardi, G., Vlemmix, T., De Bock, V., De Backer, H., Fayt, C., Hermans, C., Gillotay, D., and Wang, P.: A simple and versatile cloud-screening method for MAX-DOAS retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3509–3527, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3509-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-3509-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gil-Ojeda, M., Navarro-Comas, M., Gómez-Martín, L., Adame, J. A., Saiz-Lopez, A., Cuevas, C. A., González, Y., Puentedura, O., Cuevas, E., Lamarque, J.-F., Kinninson, D., and Tilmes, S.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonal evolution in the north subtropical free troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10567–10579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10567-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10567-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gomez, L., Navarro-Comas, M., Puentedura, O., Gonzalez, Y., Cuevas, E., and Gil-Ojeda, M.: Long-path averaged mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the free troposphere from mountain MAX-DOAS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3373–3386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3373-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-3373-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Granier, C., Bessagnet, B., Bond, T., D'Angiola, A., Denier van der Gon, H.,
Frost, G. J., Heil, A., Kaiser, J. W., Kinne, S., Klimont, Z., Kloster, S.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Liousse, C., Masui, T., Meleux, F., Mieville, A., Ohara,
T., Raut, J.-C., Riahi, K., Schultz, M. G., Smith, S. J., Thompson, A., van
Aardenne, J., van der Werf, G. R., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Evolution of
anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and
regional scales during the 1980–2010 period, Climatic Change, 109, 163,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0154-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-011-0154-1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hammer, M. S., Martin, R. V., Li, C., Torres, O., Manning, M., and Boys, B. L.: Insight into global trends in aerosol composition from 2005 to 2015 inferred from the OM<?pagebreak page6988?>I Ultraviolet Aerosol Index, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8097–8112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8097-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-8097-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harder, H., Camy, Peyret, C., Ferlemann, F., Fitzenberger, R., Hawat, T.,
Osterkamp, H., Schneider, M., Perner, D., Platt, U., Vradelis, P., and
Pfeilsticker, K.: Stratospheric BrO profiles measured at different latitudes
and seasons: Atmospheric observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 3843–3846,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998gl900026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998gl900026</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hendrick, F., Van Roozendael, M., Chipperfield, M. P., Dorf, M., Goutail, F., Yang, X., Fayt, C., Hermans, C., Pfeilsticker, K., Pommereau, J.-P., Pyle, J. A., Theys, N., and De Mazière, M.: Retrieval of stratospheric and tropospheric BrO profiles and columns using ground-based zenith-sky DOAS observations at Harestua, 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4869–4885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4869-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4869-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hendrick, F., Müller, J.-F., Clémer, K., Wang, P., De Mazière, M., Fayt, C., Gielen, C., Hermans, C., Ma, J. Z., Pinardi, G., Stavrakou, T., Vlemmix, T., and Van Roozendael, M.: Four years of ground-based MAX-DOAS observations of HONO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Beijing area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 765–781, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-765-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-765-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hönninger, G. and Platt, U.: Observations of BrO and its vertical
distribution during surface ozone depletion at Alert, Atmos.
Environ., 36, 2481–2489, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hönninger, G., von Friedeburg, C., and Platt, U.: Multi axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 231–254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-231-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-231-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jin, J., Ma, J., Lin, W., Zhao, H., Shaiganfar, R., Beirle, S., and Wagner,
T.: MAX-DOAS measurements and satellite validation of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical column densities at a rural site of North China,
Atmos. Environ., 133, 12–25, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.031</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Klimont, Z., Kupiainen, K., Heyes, C., Purohit, P., Cofala, J., Rafaj, P., Borken-Kleefeld, J., and Schöpp, W.: Global anthropogenic emissions of particulate matter including black carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8681–8723, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8681-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-8681-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Krotkov, N. A., McLinden, C. A., Li, C., Lamsal, L. N., Celarier, E. A., Marchenko, S. V., Swartz, W. H., Bucsela, E. J., Joiner, J., Duncan, B. N., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Levelt, P. F., Fioletov, V. E., Dickerson, R. R., He, H., Lu, Z., and Streets, D. G.: Aura OMI observations of regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution changes from 2005 to 2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4605–4629, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lampel, J., Zielcke, J., Schmitt, S., Pöhler, D., Frieß, U., Platt, U., and Wagner, T.: Detection of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption around 328 and 419 nm in measured atmospheric absorption spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1671–1683, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1671-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-1671-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lary, D. J.: Halogens and the chemistry of the free troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 227–237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-227-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-227-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, D. S., Köhler, I., Grobler, E., Rohrer, F., Sausen, R.,
Gallardo-Klenner, L., Olivier, J. G. J., Dentener, F. J., and Bouwman, A.
F.: Estimations of global no, emissions and their uncertainties, Atmos.
Environ., 31, 1735–1749, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00327-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00327-5</ext-link>,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J., Gromov, S., Pozzer, A., and Taraborrelli, D.: Global tropospheric hydroxyl distribution, budget and reactivity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12477–12493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Leser, H., Hönninger, G., and Platt, U.: MAX-DOAS measurements of BrO
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the marine boundary layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1537,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gl015811" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002gl015811</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, C., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Boys, B. L., Hammer, M. S., Xu,
J.-W., Marais, E. A., Reff, A., Strum, M., Ridley, D. A., Crippa, M.,
Brauer, M., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in Chemical Composition of Global and
Regional Population-Weighted Fine Particulate Matter Estimated for 25 Years,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 11185–11195,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02530</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, W., Xu, X., Yu, X., Zhang, X., and Huang, J.: Observed levels and
trends of gaseous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Mt. Waliguan, China: Results
from 1997 to 2009, J. Environ. Sci., 25, 726–734,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60143-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60143-0</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lübcke, P., Lampel, J., Arellano, S., Bobrowski, N., Dinger, F., Galle, B., Garzón, G., Hidalgo, S., Chacón Ortiz, Z., Vogel, L., Warnach, S., and Platt, U.: Retrieval of absolute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column amounts from scattered-light spectra: implications for the evaluation of data from automated DOAS networks, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5677–5698, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5677-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-5677-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Luo, Y., Si, F., Zhou, H., Dou, K., Liu, Y., and Liu, W.: Observations and source investigations of the boundary layer bromine monoxide (BrO) in the Ny-Ålesund Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9789–9801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9789-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-9789-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, J., Tang, J., Zhou, X., and Zhang, X.: Estimates of the chemical budget
for ozone at Waliguan Observatory J. Atmos. Chem., 41, 21–48,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013892308983" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1013892308983</ext-link>, 2002a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, J., Zhou, X., and Hauglustaine, D.: Summertime tropospheric ozone over
China simulated with a regional chemical transport model 2. Source
contributions and budget, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107,
4612, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001355" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001jd001355</ext-link>, 2002b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, J. Z., Chen, Y., Wang, W., Yan, P., Liu, H. J., Yang, S. Y., Hu, Z. J.,
and Lelieveld, J.: Strong air pollution causes widespread haze-clouds over
China, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D18204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd013065</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, J. Z., Wang, W., Chen, Y., Liu, H. J., Yan, P., Ding, G. A., Wang, M. L., Sun, J., and Lelieveld, J.: The IPAC-NC field campaign: a pollution and oxidization pool in the lower atmosphere over Huabei, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3883–3908, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3883-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-3883-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, J. Z., Beirle, S., Jin, J. L., Shaiganfar, R., Yan, P., and Wagner, T.: Tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical column densities over Beijing: results of the first three years of ground-based MAX-DOAS measurements (2008–2011) and satellite validation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1547–1567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1547-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1547-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Madronich, S.  and Calvert, J. G.: The NCAR master mechanism of the
gas-phase chemistry-Version 2.0, The National Center for Atmospheric
Research, Boulder, Colorado, Rep. NCAR/TN-333<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>STR, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page6989?><ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martin, M., Pöhler, D., Seitz, K., Sinreich, R., and Platt, U.: BrO measurements over the Eastern North-Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9545–9554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9545-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-9545-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Meng, Z.-Y., Xu, X.-B., Wang, T., Zhang, X.-Y., Yu, X.-L., Wang, S.-F., Lin,
W.-L., Chen, Y.-Z., Jiang, Y.-A., and An, X.-Q.: Ambient sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen dioxide, and ammonia at ten background and rural sites in China
during 2007–2008, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2625–2631,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.008</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mu, Y., Pang, X., Quan, J., and Zhang, X.: Atmospheric carbonyl compounds in
Chinese background area: A remote mountain of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D22302,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd008211</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peterson, P. K., Simpson, W. R., Pratt, K. A., Shepson, P. B., Frieß, U., Zielcke, J., Platt, U., Walsh, S. J., and Nghiem, S. V.: Dependence of the vertical distribution of bromine monoxide in the lower troposphere on meteorological factors such as wind speed and stability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2119–2137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2119-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2119-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peterson, P. K., Pöhler, D., Sihler, H., Zielcke, J., General, S., Frieß, U., Platt, U., Simpson, W. R., Nghiem, S. V., Shepson, P. B., Stirm, B. H., Dhaniyala, S., Wagner, T., Caulton, D. R., Fuentes, J. D., and Pratt, K. A.: Observations of bromine monoxide transport in the Arctic sustained on aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7567–7579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7567-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7567-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Platt, U.  and Hönninger, G.: The role of halogen species in the
troposphere, Chemosphere, 52, 325–338, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prados-Roman, C., Gómez-Martín, L., Puentedura, O., Navarro-Comas, M., Iglesias, J., de Mingo, J. R., Pérez, M., Ochoa, H., Barlasina, M. E., Carbajal, G., and Yela, M.: Reactive bromine in the low troposphere of Antarctica: estimations at two research sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8549–8570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8549-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-8549-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Richter, A., Wittrock, F., Ladstätter-Weissenmayer, A.,
and Burrows, J. P.: GOME measurements of stratospheric and tropospheric BrO,
Adv. Space Res., 29, 1667–1672, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Roscoe, H. K., Brough, N., Jones, A. E., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., Van Roozendael, M., and Hendrick, F.: Resolution of an important discrepancy between remote and in-situ measurements of tropospheric BrO during Antarctic enhancements, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 5, 5419–5448, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-5-5419-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amtd-5-5419-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saiz-Lopez, A., Plane, J. M. C., and Shillito, J. A.: Bromine oxide in the
mid-latitude marine boundary layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L03111,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl018956" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003gl018956</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schreier, S. F., Richter, A., Wittrock, F., and Burrows, J. P.: Estimates of free-tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO mixing ratios derived from high-altitude mountain MAX-DOAS observations at midlatitudes and in the tropics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2803–2817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2803-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2803-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H.  and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, 2nd Edn., Hohn Wiley &amp; Sons
Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Simpson, W. R., Peterson, P. K., Frieß, U., Sihler, H., Lampel, J., Platt, U., Moore, C., Pratt, K., Shepson, P., Halfacre, J., and Nghiem, S. V.: Horizontal and vertical structure of reactive bromine events probed by bromine monoxide MAX-DOAS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9291–9309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9291-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-9291-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M., van der Werf, G. R., Giglio, L., and Guenther, A.: Evaluating the performance of pyrogenic and biogenic emission inventories against one decade of space-based formaldehyde columns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1037–1060, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1037-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1037-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stohl, A., Aamaas, B., Amann, M., Baker, L. H., Bellouin, N., Berntsen, T. K., Boucher, O., Cherian, R., Collins, W., Daskalakis, N., Dusinska, M., Eckhardt, S., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Harju, M., Heyes, C., Hodnebrog, Ø., Hao, J., Im, U., Kanakidou, M., Klimont, Z., Kupiainen, K., Law, K. S., Lund, M. T., Maas, R., MacIntosh, C. R., Myhre, G., Myriokefalitakis, S., Olivié, D., Quaas, J., Quennehen, B., Raut, J.-C., Rumbold, S. T., Samset, B. H., Schulz, M., Seland, Ø., Shine, K. P., Skeie, R. B., Wang, S., Yttri, K. E., and Zhu, T.: Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10529–10566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stutz, J., Ackermann, R., Fast, J. D., and Barrie, L.: Atmospheric reactive
chlorine and bromine at the Great Salt Lake, Utah, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29,
1380, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gl014812" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002gl014812</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tang, J., Wen, Y. P., Xu, X. B., Zheng, X. D., Guo, S., and Zhao, Y. C.:
China Global Atmosphere Watch Baseline Observatory and its measurement
program, in: CAMS Annual Report 1994–1995, Beijing, 56–65, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Theys, N., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Fayt, C., Hermans, C., Baray, J.-L., Goutail, F., Pommereau, J.-P., and De Mazière, M.: Retrieval of stratospheric and tropospheric BrO columns from multi-axis DOAS measurements at Reunion Island (21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 56<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4733–4749, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4733-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4733-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tulet, P., Di Muro, A., Colomb, A., Denjean, C., Duflot, V., Arellano, S., Foucart, B., Brioude, J., Sellegri, K., Peltier, A., Aiuppa, A., Barthe, C., Bhugwant, C., Bielli, S., Boissier, P., Boudoire, G., Bourrianne, T., Brunet, C., Burnet, F., Cammas, J.-P., Gabarrot, F., Galle, B., Giudice, G., Guadagno, C., Jeamblu, F., Kowalski, P., Leclair de Bellevue, J., Marquestaut, N., Mékies, D., Metzger, J.-M., Pianezze, J., Portafaix, T., Sciare, J., Tournigand, A., and Villeneuve, N.: First results of the Piton de la Fournaise STRAP 2015 experiment: multidisciplinary tracking of a volcanic gas and aerosol plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5355–5378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5355-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-5355-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Van Roozendael, M., Wagner, T., Richter, A., Pundt, I., Arlander, D.,
Burrows, J. P., Chipperfield, M., Fayt, C., Johnston, P. V., Lambert, J.-C.,
Kreher, K., Pfeilsticker, K., Platt, U., Pommereau, J.-P., Sinnhuber, B.-M.,
Tornkvist, K. K., and Wittrock, F.: Intercomparison of BrO measurements from
ERS-2 GOME, ground-based and balloon platforms, Adv. Space Res., 29,
1661–1666, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Roozendael, M., Fayt, C., Post, P., Hermans, C., and Lambert, J.-C.:
Retrieval of BrO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from UV-Visible Observations, in: Sounding the
troposphere from space: a new Era for Atmospheric Chemistry, The TROPOSAT
Final Report, edited by: Borrell, P., Borrell, P. M., Burrows, J. P., and
Platt, U., Springer, Dordrecht, 155–166, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Baidar, S., Campos, T. L., Coburn, S., DiGangi, J. P., Dix, B., Eloranta, E. W., Koenig, T. K., Morley, B., Ortega, I., Pierce, B. R., Reeves, M., Sinreich, R., Wang, S., Zondlo<?pagebreak page6990?>, M. A., and Romashkin, P. A.: Aircraft measurements of BrO, IO, glyoxal, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerosol extinction profiles in the tropics: comparison with aircraft-/ship-based in situ and lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2121–2148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
von Glasow, R.  and Crutzen, P. J.: Tropospheric Halogen Chemistry, in:
Treatise on Geochemistry Update1, edited by: Holland, H. D.  and Turekian,
K. K., Elsevier-Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 1–67, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>von Glasow, R., von Kuhlmann, R., Lawrence, M. G., Platt, U., and Crutzen, P. J.: Impact of reactive bromine chemistry in the troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2481–2497, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2481-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-2481-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wagner, T., Dix, B., Friedeburg, C. v., Frieß, U., Sanghavi, S.,
Sinreich, R., and Platt, U.: MAX-DOAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements: A new technique
to derive information on atmospheric aerosols – Principles and information
content, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D22205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004904" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd004904</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wagner, T., Burrows, J. P., Deutschmann, T., Dix, B., von Friedeburg, C., Frieß, U., Hendrick, F., Heue, K.-P., Irie, H., Iwabuchi, H., Kanaya, Y., Keller, J., McLinden, C. A., Oetjen, H., Palazzi, E., Petritoli, A., Platt, U., Postylyakov, O., Pukite, J., Richter, A., van Roozendael, M., Rozanov, A., Rozanov, V., Sinreich, R., Sanghavi, S., and Wittrock, F.: Comparison of box-air-mass-factors and radiances for Multiple-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) geometries calculated from different UV/visible radiative transfer models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1809–1833, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1809-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1809-2007</ext-link>, 2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wagner, T., Ibrahim, O., Sinreich, R., Frieß, U., von Glasow, R., and Platt, U.: Enhanced tropospheric BrO over Antarctic sea ice in mid winter observed by MAX-DOAS on board the research vessel Polarstern, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3129–3142, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3129-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3129-2007</ext-link>, 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wagner, T., Apituley, A., Beirle, S., Dörner, S., Friess, U., Remmers, J., and Shaiganfar, R.: Cloud detection and classification based on MAX-DOAS observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1289–1320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1289-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-1289-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wagner, T., Beirle, S., Remmers, J., Shaiganfar, R., and Wang, Y.: Absolute calibration of the colour index and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption derived from Multi AXis (MAX-)DOAS measurements and their application to a standardised cloud classification algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4803–4823, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4803-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-4803-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, T., Wong, H. L. A., Tang, J., Ding, A., Wu, W. S., and Zhang, X. C.:
On the origin of surface ozone and reactive nitrogen observed at a remote
mountain site in the northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, western China,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D08303,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006527" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005jd006527</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, T., Hendrick, F., Wang, P., Tang, G., Clémer, K., Yu, H., Fayt, C., Hermans, C., Gielen, C., Müller, J.-F., Pinardi, G., Theys, N., Brenot, H., and Van Roozendael, M.: Evaluation of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieved from MAX-DOAS measurements in Xianghe, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11149–11164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11149-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11149-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Lampel, J., Xie, P., Beirle, S., Li, A., Wu, D., and Wagner, T.: Ground-based MAX-DOAS observations of tropospheric aerosols, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO in Wuxi, China, from 2011 to 2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2189–2215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2189-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2189-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Werner, B., Stutz, J., Spolaor, M., Scalone, L., Raecke, R., Festa, J., Colosimo, S. F., Cheung, R., Tsai, C., Hossaini, R., Chipperfield, M. P., Taverna, G. S., Feng, W., Elkins, J. W., Fahey, D. W., Gao, R.-S., Hintsa, E. J., Thornberry, T. D., Moore, F. L., Navarro, M. A., Atlas, E., Daube, B. C., Pittman, J., Wofsy, S., and Pfeilsticker, K.: Probing the subtropical lowermost stratosphere and the tropical upper troposphere and tropopause layer for inorganic bromine, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1161–1186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1161-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1161-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wittrock, F., Oetjen, H., Richter, A., Fietkau, S., Medeke, T., Rozanov, A., and Burrows, J. P.: MAX-DOAS measurements of atmospheric trace gases in Ny-Ålesund – Radiative transfer studies and their application, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 955–966, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-955-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-955-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xing, J., Mathur, R., Pleim, J., Hogrefe, C., Gan, C.-M., Wong, D. C., Wei, C., Gilliam, R., and Pouliot, G.: Observations and modeling of air quality trends over 1990–2010 across the Northern Hemisphere: China, the United States and Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2723–2747, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2723-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2723-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xue, L. K., Wang, T., Zhang, J. M., Zhang, X. C., Deliger, Poon, C. N.,
Ding, A. J., Zhou, X. H., Wu, W. S., Tang, J., Zhang, Q. Z., and Wang, W.
X.: Source of surface ozone and reactive nitrogen speciation at Mount
Waliguan in western China: New insights from the 2006 summer study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D07306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd014735</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xue, L. K., Wang, T., Guo, H., Blake, D. R., Tang, J., Zhang, X. C., Saunders, S. M., and Wang, W. X.: Sources and photochemistry of volatile organic compounds in the remote atmosphere of western China: results from the Mt. Waliguan Observatory, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8551–8567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8551-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8551-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, X., Cox, R. A., Warwick, N. J., Pyle, J. A., Carver, G. D., O'Connor,
F. M., and Savage, N. H.: Tropospheric bromine chemistry and its impacts on
ozone: A model study, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006244" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005jd006244</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, X., Pyle, J. A., Cox, R. A., Theys, N., and Van Roozendael, M.: Snow-sourced bromine and its implications for polar tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7763–7773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7763-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7763-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, X., Tang, J., Li, X. S., and Liang, B. S.: Observation and analysis of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in clean air of western China, Q. J. Appl.
Meteorol., 8, 62–68, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, B., Wang, P., Ma, J. Z., Zhu, S., Pozzer, A., and Li, W.: A high-resolution emission inventory of primary pollutants for the Huabei region, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 481–501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-481-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-481-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ziemke, J. R., Oman, L. D., Strode, S. A., Douglass, A. R., Olsen, M. A., McPeters, R. D., Bhartia, P. K., Froidevaux, L., Labow, G. J., Witte, J. C., Thompson, A. M., Haffner, D. P., Kramarova, N. A., Frith, S. M., Huang, L.-K., Jaross, G. R., Seftor, C. J., Deland, M. T., and Taylor, S. L.: Trends in global tropospheric ozone inferred from a composite record of TOMS/OMI/MLS/OMPS satellite measurements and the MERRA-2 GMI simulation , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3257–3269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>MAX-DOAS measurements of NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, HCHO, and BrO at the Mt. Waliguan WMO GAW global baseline station in the Tibetan Plateau</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Mt. Waliguan Observatory (WLG) is a World Meteorological Organization
(WMO) Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) global baseline station in China. WLG is
located at the northeastern part of the Tibetan Plateau (36°17′&thinsp;N, 100°54′&thinsp;E, 3816&thinsp;m&thinsp;a.s.l.) and is
representative of the pristine atmosphere over the Eurasian continent. We
made long-term ground-based multi-axis differential optical absorption
spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) measurements at WLG during the period 2012–2015. In
this study, we retrieve the differential slant column densities (dSCDs) and
estimate the tropospheric background mixing ratios of different trace gases,
including NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, HCHO, and BrO, using the measured spectra at
WLG. Averaging of 10 original spectra is found to be an <q>optimum option</q> for
reducing both the statistical error of the spectral retrieval and systematic
errors in the analysis. The dSCDs of NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, HCHO, and BrO under
clear-sky and low-aerosol-load conditions are extracted from measured
spectra at different elevation angles at WLG. By performing radiative
transfer simulations with the model TRACY-2, we establish approximate
relationships between the trace gas dSCDs at 1° elevation angle
and the corresponding average tropospheric background volume mixing ratios.
Mixing ratios of these trace gases in the lower troposphere over WLG are
estimated to be in a range of about 7&thinsp;ppt (January) to 100&thinsp;ppt (May) for
NO<sub>2</sub>, below 0.5&thinsp;ppb for SO<sub>2</sub>, between 0.4 and 0.9&thinsp;ppb for HCHO, and
lower than 0.3&thinsp;ppt for BrO. The chemical box model simulations constrained
by the NO<sub>2</sub> concentration from our MAX-DOAS measurements show that there
is a little net ozone loss (−0.8&thinsp;ppb&thinsp;d<sup>−1</sup>) for the free-tropospheric
conditions and a little net ozone production (0.3&thinsp;ppb&thinsp;d<sup>−1</sup>) for the
boundary layer conditions over WLG during summertime. Our study provides
valuable information and data sets for further investigating tropospheric
chemistry in the background atmosphere and its links to anthropogenic
activities.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Bauwens, M., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M., van der Werf, G. R., Wiedinmyer, C., Kaiser, J. W., Sindelarova, K., and Guenther, A.: Nine years of global hydrocarbon emissions based on source inversion of OMI formaldehyde observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10133–10158, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10133-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10133-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bobrowski, N., Honninger, G., Galle, B., and Platt, U.: Detection of bromine
monoxide in a volcanic plume, Nature, 423, 273–276, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Che, H., Wang, Y., and Sun, J.: Aerosol optical properties at Mt. Waliguan Observatory, China, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6004–6009, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.050" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.050</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Coburn, S., Dix, B., Sinreich, R., and Volkamer, R.: The CU ground MAX-DOAS instrument: characterization of RMS noise limitations and first measurements near Pensacola, FL of BrO, IO, and CHOCHO, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2421–2439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2421-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2421-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
De Mazière, M., Thompson, A. M., Kurylo, M. J., Wild, J. D., Bernhard, G., Blumenstock, T., Braathen, G. O., Hannigan, J. W., Lambert, J.-C., Leblanc, T., McGee, T. J., Nedoluha, G., Petropavlovskikh, I., Seckmeyer, G., Simon, P. C., Steinbrecht, W., and Strahan, S. E.: The Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC): history, status and perspectives, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4935–4964, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4935-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4935-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Dentener, F., Kinne, S., Bond, T., Boucher, O., Cofala, J., Generoso, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Hoelzemann, J. J., Ito, A., Marelli, L., Penner, J. E., Putaud, J.-P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., van der Werf, G. R., and Wilson, J.: Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750 prescribed data-sets for AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4321–4344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
De Smedt, I., Stavrakou, T., Hendrick, F., Danckaert, T., Vlemmix, T., Pinardi, G., Theys, N., Lerot, C., Gielen, C., Vigouroux, C., Hermans, C., Fayt, C., Veefkind, P., Müller, J.-F., and Van Roozendael, M.: Diurnal, seasonal and long-term variations of global formaldehyde columns inferred from combined OMI and GOME-2 observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12519–12545, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12519-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12519-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Fioletov, V. E., McLinden, C. A., Krotkov, N., Li, C., Joiner, J., Theys, N., Carn, S., and Moran, M. D.: A global catalogue of large SO<sub>2</sub> sources and emissions derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11497–11519, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11497-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11497-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Fitzenberger, R., Bösch, H., Camy, Peyret, C., Chipperfield, M. P.,
Harder, H., Platt, U., Sinnhuber, B. M., Wagner, T., and Pfeilsticker, K.:
First profile measurements of tropospheric BrO, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27,
2921–2924, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000gl011531" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000gl011531</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Forster, P., Ramasway, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D.
W., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D. C., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R.,
Raga, G., Schulz, M., and Van Dorlando, R.: Changes in atmospheric
constituents and in radiative forcing, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical
Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon,
S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquist, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M.,
and Miller, H. L., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York,
USA, 129–234, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Frieß, U., Hollwedel, J., König-Langlo, G., Wagner, T., and Platt,
U.: Dynamics and chemistry of tropospheric bromine explosion events in the
Antarctic coastal region, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D06305,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004133" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004133</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Georgoulias, A. K., van der A, R. J., Stammes, P., Boersma, K. F., and Eskes, H. J.: Trends and trend reversal detection in 2 decades of tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6269–6294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6269-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6269-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Gielen, C., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Pinardi, G., Vlemmix, T., De Bock, V., De Backer, H., Fayt, C., Hermans, C., Gillotay, D., and Wang, P.: A simple and versatile cloud-screening method for MAX-DOAS retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3509–3527, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3509-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3509-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gil-Ojeda, M., Navarro-Comas, M., Gómez-Martín, L., Adame, J. A., Saiz-Lopez, A., Cuevas, C. A., González, Y., Puentedura, O., Cuevas, E., Lamarque, J.-F., Kinninson, D., and Tilmes, S.: NO<sub>2</sub> seasonal evolution in the north subtropical free troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10567–10579, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10567-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10567-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Gomez, L., Navarro-Comas, M., Puentedura, O., Gonzalez, Y., Cuevas, E., and Gil-Ojeda, M.: Long-path averaged mixing ratios of O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> in the free troposphere from mountain MAX-DOAS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3373–3386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3373-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3373-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Granier, C., Bessagnet, B., Bond, T., D'Angiola, A., Denier van der Gon, H.,
Frost, G. J., Heil, A., Kaiser, J. W., Kinne, S., Klimont, Z., Kloster, S.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Liousse, C., Masui, T., Meleux, F., Mieville, A., Ohara,
T., Raut, J.-C., Riahi, K., Schultz, M. G., Smith, S. J., Thompson, A., van
Aardenne, J., van der Werf, G. R., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Evolution of
anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and
regional scales during the 1980–2010 period, Climatic Change, 109, 163,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0154-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0154-1</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hammer, M. S., Martin, R. V., Li, C., Torres, O., Manning, M., and Boys, B. L.: Insight into global trends in aerosol composition from 2005 to 2015 inferred from the OMI Ultraviolet Aerosol Index, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8097–8112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8097-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8097-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Harder, H., Camy, Peyret, C., Ferlemann, F., Fitzenberger, R., Hawat, T.,
Osterkamp, H., Schneider, M., Perner, D., Platt, U., Vradelis, P., and
Pfeilsticker, K.: Stratospheric BrO profiles measured at different latitudes
and seasons: Atmospheric observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 3843–3846,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998gl900026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1998gl900026</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hendrick, F., Van Roozendael, M., Chipperfield, M. P., Dorf, M., Goutail, F., Yang, X., Fayt, C., Hermans, C., Pfeilsticker, K., Pommereau, J.-P., Pyle, J. A., Theys, N., and De Mazière, M.: Retrieval of stratospheric and tropospheric BrO profiles and columns using ground-based zenith-sky DOAS observations at Harestua, 60°&thinsp;N, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4869–4885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4869-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4869-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hendrick, F., Müller, J.-F., Clémer, K., Wang, P., De Mazière, M., Fayt, C., Gielen, C., Hermans, C., Ma, J. Z., Pinardi, G., Stavrakou, T., Vlemmix, T., and Van Roozendael, M.: Four years of ground-based MAX-DOAS observations of HONO and NO<sub>2</sub> in the Beijing area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 765–781, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-765-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-765-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hönninger, G. and Platt, U.: Observations of BrO and its vertical
distribution during surface ozone depletion at Alert, Atmos.
Environ., 36, 2481–2489, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hönninger, G., von Friedeburg, C., and Platt, U.: Multi axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 231–254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-231-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-231-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Jin, J., Ma, J., Lin, W., Zhao, H., Shaiganfar, R., Beirle, S., and Wagner,
T.: MAX-DOAS measurements and satellite validation of tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub>
and SO<sub>2</sub> vertical column densities at a rural site of North China,
Atmos. Environ., 133, 12–25, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.031</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Klimont, Z., Kupiainen, K., Heyes, C., Purohit, P., Cofala, J., Rafaj, P., Borken-Kleefeld, J., and Schöpp, W.: Global anthropogenic emissions of particulate matter including black carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8681–8723, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8681-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8681-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Krotkov, N. A., McLinden, C. A., Li, C., Lamsal, L. N., Celarier, E. A., Marchenko, S. V., Swartz, W. H., Bucsela, E. J., Joiner, J., Duncan, B. N., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Levelt, P. F., Fioletov, V. E., Dickerson, R. R., He, H., Lu, Z., and Streets, D. G.: Aura OMI observations of regional SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> pollution changes from 2005 to 2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4605–4629, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Lampel, J., Zielcke, J., Schmitt, S., Pöhler, D., Frieß, U., Platt, U., and Wagner, T.: Detection of O<sub>4</sub> absorption around 328 and 419&thinsp;nm in measured atmospheric absorption spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1671–1683, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1671-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1671-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Lary, D. J.: Halogens and the chemistry of the free troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 227–237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-227-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-227-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, D. S., Köhler, I., Grobler, E., Rohrer, F., Sausen, R.,
Gallardo-Klenner, L., Olivier, J. G. J., Dentener, F. J., and Bouwman, A.
F.: Estimations of global no, emissions and their uncertainties, Atmos.
Environ., 31, 1735–1749, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00327-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00327-5</a>,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Lelieveld, J., Gromov, S., Pozzer, A., and Taraborrelli, D.: Global tropospheric hydroxyl distribution, budget and reactivity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12477–12493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Leser, H., Hönninger, G., and Platt, U.: MAX-DOAS measurements of BrO
and NO<sub>2</sub> in the marine boundary layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1537,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gl015811" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gl015811</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Boys, B. L., Hammer, M. S., Xu,
J.-W., Marais, E. A., Reff, A., Strum, M., Ridley, D. A., Crippa, M.,
Brauer, M., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in Chemical Composition of Global and
Regional Population-Weighted Fine Particulate Matter Estimated for 25 Years,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 11185–11195,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02530" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02530</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, W., Xu, X., Yu, X., Zhang, X., and Huang, J.: Observed levels and
trends of gaseous SO<sub>2</sub> and HNO<sub>3</sub> at Mt. Waliguan, China: Results
from 1997 to 2009, J. Environ. Sci., 25, 726–734,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60143-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60143-0</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Lübcke, P., Lampel, J., Arellano, S., Bobrowski, N., Dinger, F., Galle, B., Garzón, G., Hidalgo, S., Chacón Ortiz, Z., Vogel, L., Warnach, S., and Platt, U.: Retrieval of absolute SO<sub>2</sub> column amounts from scattered-light spectra: implications for the evaluation of data from automated DOAS networks, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5677–5698, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5677-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5677-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Luo, Y., Si, F., Zhou, H., Dou, K., Liu, Y., and Liu, W.: Observations and source investigations of the boundary layer bromine monoxide (BrO) in the Ny-Ålesund Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9789–9801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9789-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9789-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, J., Tang, J., Zhou, X., and Zhang, X.: Estimates of the chemical budget
for ozone at Waliguan Observatory J. Atmos. Chem., 41, 21–48,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013892308983" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013892308983</a>, 2002a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, J., Zhou, X., and Hauglustaine, D.: Summertime tropospheric ozone over
China simulated with a regional chemical transport model 2. Source
contributions and budget, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107,
4612, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001355" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001355</a>, 2002b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, J. Z., Chen, Y., Wang, W., Yan, P., Liu, H. J., Yang, S. Y., Hu, Z. J.,
and Lelieveld, J.: Strong air pollution causes widespread haze-clouds over
China, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D18204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013065</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, J. Z., Wang, W., Chen, Y., Liu, H. J., Yan, P., Ding, G. A., Wang, M. L., Sun, J., and Lelieveld, J.: The IPAC-NC field campaign: a pollution and oxidization pool in the lower atmosphere over Huabei, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3883–3908, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3883-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3883-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, J. Z., Beirle, S., Jin, J. L., Shaiganfar, R., Yan, P., and Wagner, T.: Tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> vertical column densities over Beijing: results of the first three years of ground-based MAX-DOAS measurements (2008–2011) and satellite validation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1547–1567, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1547-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1547-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Madronich, S.  and Calvert, J. G.: The NCAR master mechanism of the
gas-phase chemistry-Version 2.0, The National Center for Atmospheric
Research, Boulder, Colorado, Rep. NCAR/TN-333+STR, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, M., Pöhler, D., Seitz, K., Sinreich, R., and Platt, U.: BrO measurements over the Eastern North-Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9545–9554, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9545-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9545-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Meng, Z.-Y., Xu, X.-B., Wang, T., Zhang, X.-Y., Yu, X.-L., Wang, S.-F., Lin,
W.-L., Chen, Y.-Z., Jiang, Y.-A., and An, X.-Q.: Ambient sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen dioxide, and ammonia at ten background and rural sites in China
during 2007–2008, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2625–2631,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.008</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Mu, Y., Pang, X., Quan, J., and Zhang, X.: Atmospheric carbonyl compounds in
Chinese background area: A remote mountain of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D22302,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008211</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Peterson, P. K., Simpson, W. R., Pratt, K. A., Shepson, P. B., Frieß, U., Zielcke, J., Platt, U., Walsh, S. J., and Nghiem, S. V.: Dependence of the vertical distribution of bromine monoxide in the lower troposphere on meteorological factors such as wind speed and stability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2119–2137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2119-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2119-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Peterson, P. K., Pöhler, D., Sihler, H., Zielcke, J., General, S., Frieß, U., Platt, U., Simpson, W. R., Nghiem, S. V., Shepson, P. B., Stirm, B. H., Dhaniyala, S., Wagner, T., Caulton, D. R., Fuentes, J. D., and Pratt, K. A.: Observations of bromine monoxide transport in the Arctic sustained on aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7567–7579, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7567-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7567-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Platt, U.  and Hönninger, G.: The role of halogen species in the
troposphere, Chemosphere, 52, 325–338, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Prados-Roman, C., Gómez-Martín, L., Puentedura, O., Navarro-Comas, M., Iglesias, J., de Mingo, J. R., Pérez, M., Ochoa, H., Barlasina, M. E., Carbajal, G., and Yela, M.: Reactive bromine in the low troposphere of Antarctica: estimations at two research sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8549–8570, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8549-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8549-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Richter, A., Wittrock, F., Ladstätter-Weissenmayer, A.,
and Burrows, J. P.: GOME measurements of stratospheric and tropospheric BrO,
Adv. Space Res., 29, 1667–1672, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Roscoe, H. K., Brough, N., Jones, A. E., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., Van Roozendael, M., and Hendrick, F.: Resolution of an important discrepancy between remote and in-situ measurements of tropospheric BrO during Antarctic enhancements, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 5, 5419–5448, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-5-5419-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-5-5419-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Saiz-Lopez, A., Plane, J. M. C., and Shillito, J. A.: Bromine oxide in the
mid-latitude marine boundary layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L03111,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl018956" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl018956</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Schreier, S. F., Richter, A., Wittrock, F., and Burrows, J. P.: Estimates of free-tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO mixing ratios derived from high-altitude mountain MAX-DOAS observations at midlatitudes and in the tropics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2803–2817, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2803-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2803-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H.  and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, 2nd Edn., Hohn Wiley &amp; Sons
Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Simpson, W. R., Peterson, P. K., Frieß, U., Sihler, H., Lampel, J., Platt, U., Moore, C., Pratt, K., Shepson, P., Halfacre, J., and Nghiem, S. V.: Horizontal and vertical structure of reactive bromine events probed by bromine monoxide MAX-DOAS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9291–9309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9291-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9291-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M., van der Werf, G. R., Giglio, L., and Guenther, A.: Evaluating the performance of pyrogenic and biogenic emission inventories against one decade of space-based formaldehyde columns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1037–1060, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1037-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1037-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Stohl, A., Aamaas, B., Amann, M., Baker, L. H., Bellouin, N., Berntsen, T. K., Boucher, O., Cherian, R., Collins, W., Daskalakis, N., Dusinska, M., Eckhardt, S., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Harju, M., Heyes, C., Hodnebrog, Ø., Hao, J., Im, U., Kanakidou, M., Klimont, Z., Kupiainen, K., Law, K. S., Lund, M. T., Maas, R., MacIntosh, C. R., Myhre, G., Myriokefalitakis, S., Olivié, D., Quaas, J., Quennehen, B., Raut, J.-C., Rumbold, S. T., Samset, B. H., Schulz, M., Seland, Ø., Shine, K. P., Skeie, R. B., Wang, S., Yttri, K. E., and Zhu, T.: Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10529–10566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Stutz, J., Ackermann, R., Fast, J. D., and Barrie, L.: Atmospheric reactive
chlorine and bromine at the Great Salt Lake, Utah, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29,
1380, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gl014812" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gl014812</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, J., Wen, Y. P., Xu, X. B., Zheng, X. D., Guo, S., and Zhao, Y. C.:
China Global Atmosphere Watch Baseline Observatory and its measurement
program, in: CAMS Annual Report 1994–1995, Beijing, 56–65, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Theys, N., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Fayt, C., Hermans, C., Baray, J.-L., Goutail, F., Pommereau, J.-P., and De Mazière, M.: Retrieval of stratospheric and tropospheric BrO columns from multi-axis DOAS measurements at Reunion Island (21°&thinsp;S, 56°&thinsp;E), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4733–4749, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4733-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4733-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Tulet, P., Di Muro, A., Colomb, A., Denjean, C., Duflot, V., Arellano, S., Foucart, B., Brioude, J., Sellegri, K., Peltier, A., Aiuppa, A., Barthe, C., Bhugwant, C., Bielli, S., Boissier, P., Boudoire, G., Bourrianne, T., Brunet, C., Burnet, F., Cammas, J.-P., Gabarrot, F., Galle, B., Giudice, G., Guadagno, C., Jeamblu, F., Kowalski, P., Leclair de Bellevue, J., Marquestaut, N., Mékies, D., Metzger, J.-M., Pianezze, J., Portafaix, T., Sciare, J., Tournigand, A., and Villeneuve, N.: First results of the Piton de la Fournaise STRAP 2015 experiment: multidisciplinary tracking of a volcanic gas and aerosol plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5355–5378, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5355-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5355-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Van Roozendael, M., Wagner, T., Richter, A., Pundt, I., Arlander, D.,
Burrows, J. P., Chipperfield, M., Fayt, C., Johnston, P. V., Lambert, J.-C.,
Kreher, K., Pfeilsticker, K., Platt, U., Pommereau, J.-P., Sinnhuber, B.-M.,
Tornkvist, K. K., and Wittrock, F.: Intercomparison of BrO measurements from
ERS-2 GOME, ground-based and balloon platforms, Adv. Space Res., 29,
1661–1666, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Van Roozendael, M., Fayt, C., Post, P., Hermans, C., and Lambert, J.-C.:
Retrieval of BrO and NO<sub>2</sub> from UV-Visible Observations, in: Sounding the
troposphere from space: a new Era for Atmospheric Chemistry, The TROPOSAT
Final Report, edited by: Borrell, P., Borrell, P. M., Burrows, J. P., and
Platt, U., Springer, Dordrecht, 155–166, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Volkamer, R., Baidar, S., Campos, T. L., Coburn, S., DiGangi, J. P., Dix, B., Eloranta, E. W., Koenig, T. K., Morley, B., Ortega, I., Pierce, B. R., Reeves, M., Sinreich, R., Wang, S., Zondlo, M. A., and Romashkin, P. A.: Aircraft measurements of BrO, IO, glyoxal, NO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>O, O<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>2</sub> and aerosol extinction profiles in the tropics: comparison with aircraft-/ship-based in situ and lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2121–2148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
von Glasow, R.  and Crutzen, P. J.: Tropospheric Halogen Chemistry, in:
Treatise on Geochemistry Update1, edited by: Holland, H. D.  and Turekian,
K. K., Elsevier-Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 1–67, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
von Glasow, R., von Kuhlmann, R., Lawrence, M. G., Platt, U., and Crutzen, P. J.: Impact of reactive bromine chemistry in the troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2481–2497, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2481-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2481-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, T., Dix, B., Friedeburg, C. v., Frieß, U., Sanghavi, S.,
Sinreich, R., and Platt, U.: MAX-DOAS O<sub>4</sub> measurements: A new technique
to derive information on atmospheric aerosols – Principles and information
content, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D22205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004904" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004904</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, T., Burrows, J. P., Deutschmann, T., Dix, B., von Friedeburg, C., Frieß, U., Hendrick, F., Heue, K.-P., Irie, H., Iwabuchi, H., Kanaya, Y., Keller, J., McLinden, C. A., Oetjen, H., Palazzi, E., Petritoli, A., Platt, U., Postylyakov, O., Pukite, J., Richter, A., van Roozendael, M., Rozanov, A., Rozanov, V., Sinreich, R., Sanghavi, S., and Wittrock, F.: Comparison of box-air-mass-factors and radiances for Multiple-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) geometries calculated from different UV/visible radiative transfer models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1809–1833, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1809-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1809-2007</a>, 2007a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, T., Ibrahim, O., Sinreich, R., Frieß, U., von Glasow, R., and Platt, U.: Enhanced tropospheric BrO over Antarctic sea ice in mid winter observed by MAX-DOAS on board the research vessel Polarstern, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3129–3142, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3129-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3129-2007</a>, 2007b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, T., Apituley, A., Beirle, S., Dörner, S., Friess, U., Remmers, J., and Shaiganfar, R.: Cloud detection and classification based on MAX-DOAS observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1289–1320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1289-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1289-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, T., Beirle, S., Remmers, J., Shaiganfar, R., and Wang, Y.: Absolute calibration of the colour index and O<sub>4</sub> absorption derived from Multi AXis (MAX-)DOAS measurements and their application to a standardised cloud classification algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4803–4823, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4803-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4803-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, T., Wong, H. L. A., Tang, J., Ding, A., Wu, W. S., and Zhang, X. C.:
On the origin of surface ozone and reactive nitrogen observed at a remote
mountain site in the northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, western China,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D08303,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006527" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006527</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, T., Hendrick, F., Wang, P., Tang, G., Clémer, K., Yu, H., Fayt, C., Hermans, C., Gielen, C., Müller, J.-F., Pinardi, G., Theys, N., Brenot, H., and Van Roozendael, M.: Evaluation of tropospheric SO<sub>2</sub> retrieved from MAX-DOAS measurements in Xianghe, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11149–11164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11149-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11149-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Lampel, J., Xie, P., Beirle, S., Li, A., Wu, D., and Wagner, T.: Ground-based MAX-DOAS observations of tropospheric aerosols, NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO in Wuxi, China, from 2011 to 2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2189–2215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2189-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2189-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Werner, B., Stutz, J., Spolaor, M., Scalone, L., Raecke, R., Festa, J., Colosimo, S. F., Cheung, R., Tsai, C., Hossaini, R., Chipperfield, M. P., Taverna, G. S., Feng, W., Elkins, J. W., Fahey, D. W., Gao, R.-S., Hintsa, E. J., Thornberry, T. D., Moore, F. L., Navarro, M. A., Atlas, E., Daube, B. C., Pittman, J., Wofsy, S., and Pfeilsticker, K.: Probing the subtropical lowermost stratosphere and the tropical upper troposphere and tropopause layer for inorganic bromine, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1161–1186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1161-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1161-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Wittrock, F., Oetjen, H., Richter, A., Fietkau, S., Medeke, T., Rozanov, A., and Burrows, J. P.: MAX-DOAS measurements of atmospheric trace gases in Ny-Ålesund – Radiative transfer studies and their application, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 955–966, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-955-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-955-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Xing, J., Mathur, R., Pleim, J., Hogrefe, C., Gan, C.-M., Wong, D. C., Wei, C., Gilliam, R., and Pouliot, G.: Observations and modeling of air quality trends over 1990–2010 across the Northern Hemisphere: China, the United States and Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2723–2747, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2723-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2723-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Xue, L. K., Wang, T., Zhang, J. M., Zhang, X. C., Deliger, Poon, C. N.,
Ding, A. J., Zhou, X. H., Wu, W. S., Tang, J., Zhang, Q. Z., and Wang, W.
X.: Source of surface ozone and reactive nitrogen speciation at Mount
Waliguan in western China: New insights from the 2006 summer study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D07306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014735" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014735</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Xue, L. K., Wang, T., Guo, H., Blake, D. R., Tang, J., Zhang, X. C., Saunders, S. M., and Wang, W. X.: Sources and photochemistry of volatile organic compounds in the remote atmosphere of western China: results from the Mt. Waliguan Observatory, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8551–8567, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8551-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8551-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, X., Cox, R. A., Warwick, N. J., Pyle, J. A., Carver, G. D., O'Connor,
F. M., and Savage, N. H.: Tropospheric bromine chemistry and its impacts on
ozone: A model study, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006244" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006244</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, X., Pyle, J. A., Cox, R. A., Theys, N., and Van Roozendael, M.: Snow-sourced bromine and its implications for polar tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7763–7773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7763-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7763-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, X., Tang, J., Li, X. S., and Liang, B. S.: Observation and analysis of
SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> in clean air of western China, Q. J. Appl.
Meteorol., 8, 62–68, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, B., Wang, P., Ma, J. Z., Zhu, S., Pozzer, A., and Li, W.: A high-resolution emission inventory of primary pollutants for the Huabei region, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 481–501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-481-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-481-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Ziemke, J. R., Oman, L. D., Strode, S. A., Douglass, A. R., Olsen, M. A., McPeters, R. D., Bhartia, P. K., Froidevaux, L., Labow, G. J., Witte, J. C., Thompson, A. M., Haffner, D. P., Kramarova, N. A., Frith, S. M., Huang, L.-K., Jaross, G. R., Seftor, C. J., Deland, M. T., and Taylor, S. L.: Trends in global tropospheric ozone inferred from a composite record of TOMS/OMI/MLS/OMPS satellite measurements and the MERRA-2 GMI simulation , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3257–3269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
