<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-20-6953-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Air mass physiochemical characteristics over New Delhi:<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> impacts on aerosol
hygroscopicity and cloud condensation<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> nuclei (CCN) formation</article-title><alt-title>Air mass physiochemical characteristics over New Delhi</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Air mass physiochemical characteristics over New Delhi}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Z. Arub et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Arub</surname><given-names>Zainab</given-names></name>
          <email>jyotika.mmmec@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0144-993X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bhandari</surname><given-names>Sahil</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Gani</surname><given-names>Shahzad</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6966-0520</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Apte</surname><given-names>Joshua S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2796-3478</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Hildebrandt Ruiz</surname><given-names>Lea</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8378-1882</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Habib</surname><given-names>Gazala</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology
Delhi, New Delhi, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas
at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The
University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Zainab Arub (jyotika.mmmec@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>6953</fpage><lpage>6971</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>November</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>April</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>April</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 Zainab Arub et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6953/2020/acp-20-6953-2020.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6953/2020/acp-20-6953-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6953/2020/acp-20-6953-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6953/2020/acp-20-6953-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e143">Delhi is a megacity subject to high local anthropogenic emissions and
long-range transport of pollutants. This work presents for the first time
time-resolved estimates of hygroscopicity parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), spanning for
more than a year, derived from chemical composition and size distribution
data. As a part of the Delhi Aerosol Supersite (DAS) campaign, the
characterization of aerosol composition and size distribution was conducted
from January 2017 to March 2018. Air masses originating from the Arabian Sea
(AS), Bay of Bengal (BB), and southern Asia  (SA) exhibited distinct
characteristics of time-resolved sub-micron non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) species, size distributions, and CCN number concentrations.
The SA air mass had the highest NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loading with high chloride and
organics, followed by the BB air mass, which was more contaminated
than AS, with a higher organic fraction and nitrate. The primary sources
were identified as biomass-burning, thermal power plant emissions,
industrial emissions, and vehicular emissions. The average hygroscopicity parameter
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), calculated by the mixing rule, was approximately 0.3 (varying between
0.13 and 0.77) for all the air masses (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for AS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for BB, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SA). The diurnal variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were
impacted by the chemical properties and thus source activities. The total,
Aitken, and accumulation mode number concentrations were higher for SA,
followed by BB and AS. The mean values of estimated CCN number concentration
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 3669–28926 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the activated fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
0.19–0.87), for supersaturations varying from 0.1 % to 0.8 %, also showed the
same trend, implying that these were highest in SA, followed by those in BB
and then those in AS. The size turned out to be more important than chemical
composition directly, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was governed by either the Aitken
or accumulation modes, depending upon the supersaturation (SS) and critical
diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was governed mainly by the geometric mean
diameter (GMD), and such a high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the most
dominant sub-branch of the SA air mass – R1 – at 0.4 % SS) has not been seen
anywhere in the world for a continental site. The high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was a
consequence of very low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (25–130 nm, for SS ranging from
0.1 % to 0.8 %) observed for Delhi. Indirectly, the chemical properties
also impacted CCN and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by impacting the diurnal patterns of Aitken
and accumulation modes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The high-hygroscopic nature of
aerosols, high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can severely impact the
precipitation patterns of the Indian monsoon in Delhi, impact the radiation budget,
and have indirect effects and need to be investigated to quantify this
impact.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e406">High aerosol loading can have huge climatic repercussions on precipitation
including land surface feedback through rainfall, surface energy budget, and
variation in latent heat atmospheric influx (Tao et al., 2012). Added cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)
may nucleate a larger number of smaller droplets, which then take a longer
time to coalesce into raindrops (Gunn and Phillips, 1957; Squires, 1958). A
greater cloud depth, indicating higher rain initiation, occurs in<?pagebreak page6954?> more
polluted clouds. Complete suppression of warm rain might also occur and get
aggravated due to additional CCN activation above the cloud base (Braga et
al., 2017). While rain suppression was observed in the case of polluted urban
and industrial plumes (Rosenfeld, 2000), and smoke arising from forest fires
(Rosenfeld, 1999), the precipitation tendency increases due to influx of
giant CCN consisting of sea salt (Rosenfeld et al., 2002) and salt playas
(Rudich et al., 2002) due to acceleration of the auto-conversion rate
(Rosenfeld et al., 2008). To understand the impact of pollution on indirect
radiative forcing and precipitation in highly polluted regions, the
information on CCN number concentration is essential in global climate
models (GCMs) and regional climate models (RCMs).</p>
      <p id="d1e409">As per the fifth IPCC report (Boucher et al., 2013), the two most important
factors governing CCN activation and number concentration are size and composition. The aerosol chemical composition impacts the aerosol
hygroscopicity, which impacts the critical diameter and hence CCN activation.
The hygroscopicity parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is defined as the total water uptake
ability of aerosols (Petters and Kredenweis, 2007). Further, the increase in
relative humidity (RH) due to water uptake by aerosol can impact visibility
(Lee et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2012); secondary particle formation (Ervens
et al., 2011); and measurements of remote sensing (Wang and Martin, 2007; Brock
et al., 2016), aerosol loading, and its chemical composition (Chen et al.,
2018). Hence, it is essential to determine the hygroscopicity of aerosols,
especially in the polluted regions of the world, where these impacts are
expected to be highly significant.</p>
      <p id="d1e419">Although the recent precipitation data during 1950–2011, averaged over July
and August for Delhi, reveal a significant decreasing trend, there has been
an increasing trend in the frequency of heavy rainfall events and a
decrease in the frequency of wet and rainy days when it rains for a shorter
period (Guhathakurta et al., 2015). These occurrences are most likely
signatures of aerosols impacting the cloud-nucleating properties, which
calls for detailed CCN data examination. The high uncertainties associated
with radiative forcings, both direct and indirect, especially at the
regional level, are a result of poor representation of the aerosol
distributions in GCMs. This is critical for the Indian sub-continent, where
the variability in aerosol microphysical properties is very high, at various
spatial and temporal scales. These necessitate the measurement of long-term
aerosol physiochemical properties, the hygroscopicity parameter, and CCN
estimates. Detailed CCN and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements have been carried out in
different parts of the world (Rissler et al., 2004; Bougiatioti et al.,
2011; Engelhart et al., 2012) and in India, in places like Kanpur (Bhattu and Tripathi,
2014, 2015; Ram et al., 2014), Mahabaleshwar (Leena
et al., 2016), and the eastern Himalayas (Roy et al., 2017). However, no CCN
measurements or estimates have been developed so far for Delhi. There is
only one study that has estimated aerosol hygroscopicity based on PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mass, RH, and visibility data (Wang and Chen, 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e438">In this work, for the first time for Delhi, time-resolved size distribution
and chemical speciation measurements were carried out from 15 January 2017 to 31 March 2018 as a part of the Delhi Aerosol Supersite (DAS) campaign (Gani et al.,
2019). The time-resolved hygroscopicity parameter and CCN estimates were
derived using chemical speciation data from an aerosol chemical speciation
monitor (ACSM), and number concentration data from a scanning mobility
particle sizer (SMPS), measured from January 2017 to March 2018. Data were
analysed to investigate the following hypotheses: (a) the precursors to secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation
critically impact the chemical composition over Delhi, (b) the emission
sources significantly impact CCN formation by governing the size
distributions and chemical composition, and thus hygroscopicity, and (c) physical properties impact CCN more compared to chemical properties
directly – however, the physical properties are, in turn, shaped by the
chemical properties.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology and instrumentation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d1e456">For a detailed assessment of aerosol physiochemical properties, an SMPS (TSI, Shoreview, MN), ACSM (Aerodyne Research, Billerica MA), and aethalometer
(Magee Scientific Model AE33, Berkeley, CA) were operated at the Indian Institute
of Technology (IIT) Delhi in Block 5, at a height of nearly 15 m, as a part of
the DAS campaign. This sampling site in New Delhi
was free from any source activity, except for a road, located 150 m away. The IIT
campus is cleaner than the rest of the city. However, it lies in
the heart of the city, and the outskirts of the campus experience fresh
traffic influx. The IIT campus allows only limited access to vehicles and
therefore has less traffic compared to the city in general. A
temperature-controlled room was used to carry out the measurements. Two
separate and thermally insulated sampling lines (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in. outer-diameter
stainless-steel tubes) with flows of 3 and 2 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> equipped with PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
cyclone, in line with a water trap and a Nafion membrane diffusion dryer
(Magee Scientific Sample Stream Dryer, Berkeley, CA), were used for (1) an SMPS
and ACSM in conjunction with a flow controller and (2) an aethalometer,
respectively. A brief description of the instruments is given below. A
detailed description of the instruments is given in Gani et al. (2019) and
Bhandari et al. (2020).</p>
      <?pagebreak page6955?><p id="d1e492">The SMPS was comprised of a differential mobility analyser (DMA; TSI 3081), an
electrostatic classifier (TSI 3080), an X-ray aerosol neutralizer (TSI 3088),
and a water-based condensation particle counter (CPC; TSI 3785). The ambient
air was sampled in the size range 12–560 nm, with a time difference of
135 s between two scans. The sheath-to-aerosol flow ratio was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the total
flow drawn by the CPC was 1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The two dominant modes (Aitken and
accumulation) are well captured within this size range. The ACSM
sampled the inlet air at a flow rate of 0.1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a time resolution of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min. The calibration procedures and data processing are
discussed in Gani et al. (2019). The ACSM collected time-resolved NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on species that volatilize by
600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and included <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and organics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Qualitative separation of organic aerosols as BBOA, HOA, and
OOA</title>
      <p id="d1e632">The composition data presented in this work were collected in the DAS study. PMF (positive matrix factorization) analysis was conducted on the 15 months
in the dataset. As a result, biomass-burning organic aerosol (BBOA) could be resolved as a separate factor
only in spring 2018. This inability to resolve primary organic aerosol (POA)
to separate factors, namely hydrocarbon-like organic aerosol (HOA) and
BBOA, was attributed to the unit mass
resolution of the instrument (Bhandari et al., 2020, and references
therein). Owing to the lack of explicit BBOA and HOA separation in all
seasons, the Ng et al. (2010) compilation of profiles was analysed, combined with
the profiles identified in spring in Delhi. It was observed that spring 2018
profiles fell within the bounds of the uncertainty of the Ng et al. (2010)
compilation. Thus, Ng et al. (2010) reference profiles were utilized for
source attribution of each cluster. While factor profiles can differ across
the world, taking regionally relevant profiles together with those usually
employed as reference profiles for PMF analysis likely accounts for this
variability. As a part of the analysis conducted here, the mean strength at
the relevant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 57 and 60) and the standard deviation (SD)
of the profiles at these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s) were utilized in the analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e671">Organic aerosols were qualitatively segregated by comparing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the reference profiles of BBOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0337</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00884</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.025</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00521</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), HOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0838</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00378</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00227</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00214</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and oxygenated organic aerosol (OOA) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00997</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00786</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00571</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00349</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as reported by Ng et al. (2010). This was done by
first calculating the cluster means of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each cluster (Table 2). This was followed by an evaluation of residuals. Residuals represent the
deviation of the cluster means from the reference profiles. The HOA, BBOA,
and OOA residuals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were then
calculated based on cluster means of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CM</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CM</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with respect to the corresponding means of reference profiles
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RM</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RM</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as given below for HOA in Eq. (1):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M71" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CM</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RM</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CM</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RM</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The reference residuals for HOA, BBOA, and OOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ref</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ref</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ref</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
were then calculated using standard deviations of reference profiles
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SD</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ref</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SD</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ref</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SD</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ref</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as given below for HOA in Eq. (2):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M78" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ref</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SD</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ref</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SD</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ref</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The residuals of the cluster means were then compared with the reference
residuals as per the six conditions described in detail in Sect. S1 in the Supplement and
classified as HOA, BBOA, OOA, or mixed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Estimation of $\kappa$ and CCN}?><title>Estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and CCN</title>
      <p id="d1e1296">The ACSM data were used to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as per the following mixing rule in
Eq. (3) (Petters and Kredenweis, 2007):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M81" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the volume fractions and
individual hygroscopicity parameters of the various components. The
inorganics were represented by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The organic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was taken as 0.1 (Gunthe et al., 2009,
2011; Dusek et al., 2010; Rose et al., 2011). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were taken as 0.61 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1.02 for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 0.67 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sullivan et al., 2009; Petters
and Kredenweis, 2007). The density values to estimate the volume fraction of
the inorganic constituents were taken as 1770 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1519 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 1720 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Haynes et al., 2014). The density of organics was taken as 1500 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bougiatioti et al., 2009). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for BC was taken as zero, as reported in
several studies (Hong et al., 2014; Leng et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e1591">It should be noted that we assumed that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated from NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
data of ACSM represents the bulk hygroscopicity parameter in the absence of
size-resolved measurements and is a limitation of this work. The difference
due to the assumption cannot be accounted for and should be investigated in
the future. However, it is reported that for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CCN
closures within 20 % can be achieved assuming bulk composition and
internal mixing (Wang et al., 2010). Temperature, relative humidity (RH),
and the calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were then used to calculate the critical diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
from the multi-component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory (Bhattu and Tripathi, 2015). The
temperature and RH data are available from the RK Puram site
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3–4 km aerial distance from the measurement site)
maintained by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), India. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was then
estimated by integrating the size distribution obtained from SMPS above
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The CCN estimates were obtained for the supersaturation (SS) of 0.1 %, 0.15 %, 0.2 %, 0.35 %, 0.4 %, 0.5 %, 0.6 %, 0.7 %,
0.75 %, 0.8 %, 0.85 %, and 1 %. However, for the sake of detailed
analysis, 0.1 %, 0.4 %, and 0.8 % were chosen: 0.1 % represents the
condition when the effect of chemical<?pagebreak page6956?> composition is expected to be the
highest, 0.4 % represents the condition for convective clouds, and 0.8 %
represents a high-supersaturation state, when almost all aerosols tend to get
activated as CCN.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Air mass characterization</title>
      <p id="d1e1685">To characterize the air masses, the Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian
Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model was used (Draxler and Rolph, 2003) to
determine the major pathways of aerosols reaching Delhi. The 5 d back-trajectory analysis was done at the receptor site at a height of 500 m. The
cluster analysis was then performed seasonally to identify the cluster mean
trajectories per season. These mean trajectories were then again
re-clustered to identify three main clusters based on the directions of the
mean cluster trajectories: the Arabian Sea (AS) branch (16.5 % of total
trajectories), the Bay of Bengal (BB) branch (13 % of total trajectories),
and the southern Asian (SA) branch (70.5 % of total trajectories). The BB
branch was further classified as B (54 %) and B.reg (45 %), where B
represents the air masses reaching the sea, while B.reg represents the air
masses that aligned towards reaching the Bay of Bengal but did not hit the sea.
The SA branch was partitioned into L (17.5 %), R1 (54 %), R2 (18 %),
and R3 (11 %). L represents the local trajectories originating within
India, mainly from Delhi, Punjab, and Haryana. R1 represents
trajectories coming from Pakistan and Afghanistan. R2 represents
trajectories originating from Iran. R3 is representative of all trajectories
beyond these, including a portion of South Africa, the Mediterranean Sea, and
Turkey. The seasonal clusters for the winter, spring, summer, and monsoon of the
year 2017 and winter and spring of the year 2018 are shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement. The
re-clustering is shown in Fig. 1. All the chemical speciation data from
ACSM and size distribution data from SMPS were then categorized as per the
classification discussed above and used in the following discussion.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1690">HYSPLIT grouping of cluster mean trajectories based on
directions and distances of source regions. Cluster mean trajectories were
obtained for all seasons and clubbed as per directions. AS branch originated
from the Arabian Sea; BB branch, with sub-branches B and B.reg, originated
from Bay of Bengal; and SA branch, with sub-branches L, R1, R2, and R3 from
the north-western direction, originated mainly on the southern Asian landmass. The
map layer used is from “World Countries (Generalized)”, by Esri, Garmin
International (2010,
<uri>https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=170b5e6529064b8d9275168687880359</uri>, last access: 17 May 2020).
© Esri, Garmin. All rights reserved. This map is intellectual
property of Esri, Garmin, and used under license. Further details may be
found at <uri>https://www.esri.com</uri> (last access: 17 May 2020).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6953/2020/acp-20-6953-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Aerosol ageing estimation</title>
      <p id="d1e1714">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, toluene, and benzene data inventory for the entire campaign was
taken from the CPCB for RK Puram, whenever available. The data were not available
for branch B. To determine the photochemical ageing of aerosols, toluene and
benzene concentrations were used to calculate the life (in hours), as per
Nault et al. (2018) in Eq. (4):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M110" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">toluene</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">benzene</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">toluene</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">benzene</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">toluene</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">benzene</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Nault et al., 2018),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">toluene</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">190</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">benzene</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">340</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Atkinson et al., 2006) are the rate constants for
each aromatic compound, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">toluene</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">benzene</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. [OH] is not
constant and varies considerably temporally and spatially, but due to the
unavailability of data of its variation for Delhi, it was assumed constant
for ageing calculation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1987">The HYSPLIT analysis revealed that the north-western direction is the most
dominant direction, which is representative of SA air masses, and within it,
R1 is the most dominant, indicating that overall, the emissions
from Pakistan and Afghanistan and the sources en route govern
Delhi's aerosol characteristics. However, the chemical signatures were
potentially different for the various clusters, which explains the variation
in aerosol properties with time. Due to the different nature of sources and
pathways, aerosol properties vary, resulting in different hygroscopic
properties and CCN forming potential. These aspects are discussed in the
following sections.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Introduction to characteristics and sources of air masses</title>
      <p id="d1e1997">Out of the three main branches, the SA branch was the most anthropogenically
contaminated, followed by BB and AS branches, as indicated by the mean
NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Fig. 2a). The total
NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loading for the SA branch followed the sequence: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NRPM</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NRPM</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NRPM</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NRPM</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Amongst the SA branches, L was associated with the lowest organic
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and inorganic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) content, while R2 had the maximum organic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and inorganic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) content. A
summary of the overall characteristics is given in Table 1. The prominent
sources for the SA air mass include metal processing industries (Haryana and
Delhi NCR), coke and petroleum refining (Punjab), thermal power plants
(Pakistan, Punjab, and NCR Delhi), agricultural-residue burning (Punjab and
Haryana), soil dust (Pakistan, Punjab) (Jaiprakash et al., 2017), and coal
mines in Pakistan, where non-ideal burning of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
occurs (Chakraborty et al., 2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2296">Mean values of <bold>(a–c)</bold> NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(d–f)</bold> organics, inorganics,
and BC; and <bold>(g–i)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species (from top to bottom) for the various air
masses. Panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold>, and <bold>(g)</bold> are for AS, BB, and SA; <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(e)</bold>, and <bold>(h)</bold> are for BB
branches (B and B.reg); and <bold>(c)</bold>, <bold>(f)</bold>, and <bold>(i)</bold> are for SA branches (L, R1, R2, and R3).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6953/2020/acp-20-6953-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2364">Mean values of NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species and BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for all clusters.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">BC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Inorg.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">POA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">OOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Org.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B.reg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">94.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">68.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">129.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">97.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">92.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">127.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3765">Cluster means of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for all branches,
where SD means standard deviation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02389</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.00777</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.004061</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.001199</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0205</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.006107</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.004294</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.000962</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02499</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.007663</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.007089</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.003569</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02088</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.005959</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.004368</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.000916</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B.reg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01998</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.006266</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.004192</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.001012</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0239</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.007179</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.006023</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.002404</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0254</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.007878</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00717</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.003861</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02509</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.00764</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.007851</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.003576</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02427</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.006971</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.007084</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.002992</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e4022">When comparing the BB branches, total NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for B (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was slightly less than that for B.reg (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and this can be attributed to the fact that the B.reg air mass does not
travel over water (originates adjacent to the coastline) but is subject to
its influence, while the B air mass travels over water and is therefore
cleaner. B.reg had a slightly higher inorganic and organic content
than that of B.</p>
      <p id="d1e4099">The relatively higher abundance of aerosols of BB over AS can be attributed
to both the sources and the pathways of air masses. In terms of source, the
Bay of Bengal is more anthropogenically impacted than the Arabian Sea, as
concluded<?pagebreak page6957?> by the ICARB campaign (Kalapureddy et al., 2009). Previous studies
(Nair et al., 2008a, b; Moorthy et al., 2008) reported higher aerosol
number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as well as black carbon (BC) concentration,
over the Bay of Bengal than over the Arabian Sea, in all size ranges within
the marine boundary layer as well as the vertical column. The BB air mass
travelled over the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP), and the AS air mass travelled across
western India and the desert region of Rajasthan. Based on previous emission
estimates (Habib et al., 2006), the emission fluxes from fossil fuel
dominate the aerosol burden over the IGP. The aerosol
over the IGP is largely composed of inorganic oxidized matter (IOM), including
fly ash from coal-fired power plants and mineral matter from open crop waste
burning (Habib et al., 2006). The AS air mass travels over western India and
brings pollution from both fossil fuel combustion and desert dust (Habib et
al., 2006).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{PM${}_{{1}}$ chemical composition of different air
masses}?><title>PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical composition of different air
masses</title>
      <?pagebreak page6958?><p id="d1e4131">Mass closure between SMPS size distribution data and the sum of ACSM species
together with BC was achieved (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as detailed in our parallel
paper (Gani et al., 2019). The NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, POA, and OOA) and BC varied
significantly for the different air masses, both in terms of the mass of
species (Fig. 2c) and the diurnal patterns (Fig. 3), leading to
different aerosol chemistry and chemical reactions. A summary of the average
mass of each species for all air masses is detailed in Table 1. In brief,
both POA and OOA, followed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
dominated the PM composition for the SA air mass, while OOA, followed by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OOA, was dominant for BB and AS air masses. High chloride
was a special feature of the SA air mass which was not apparent in the
other two branches.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4270">Diurnal variation in NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, POA, and OOA) and BC for AS on
the left, BB (B and B.reg) in the middle, and SA (L, R1, R2, and R3) air
masses on the right.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6953/2020/acp-20-6953-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4341"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was assumed to be the dominant cation based on high aerosol
neutralization ratio (ANR) values (mean values ranging from 0.95 to 0.85). The ANR
is defined as the normalized ratio of the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration needed for full
neutralization of the anions and calculated as per Eq. (5) (Zhang et al.,
2007):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M269" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ANR</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">neut</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Detailed ANR values are given in Table S1 in the Supplement. ANR values revealed that while
AS, B, and L branches were completely neutralized, B.reg, R1, R2, and R3
were only partly neutralized, indicating that minor components of sulfate,
chloride, and nitrate may be bound to non-volatile salts such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NaCl, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or are associated with organics as
organosulfates, organochlorides, or organonitrates, evidence for which is
shown in a previous DAS study (Bhandari et al., 2020).</p>
      <?pagebreak page6960?><p id="d1e4533">To determine the dominant salts, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions were neutralized with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions. The speciation of salts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined by the molar ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is indicative of (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> , while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates a mixture of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates a mixture of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Nenes et al., 1998; Asa-Awuku et al., 2011; Padró et al., 2012). For
Delhi, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was obtained for all branches,
indicating that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was present in all branches.
Furthermore, the non-sulfate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions [ns-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] were
calculated, as per <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ns-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were then determined for the coupling
of ns-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions with (a) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions, (b) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions,
and (c) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions jointly (Du et al., 2010). All
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are detailed in Table S1. This analysis revealed that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dominant salt for AS and B branches based on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.78 for AS and 0.75 for BB 0.75.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation for SA was confirmed by a high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value (0.90) for
ns-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coupling with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A similar finding is reported by
Bhandari et al. (2020) based on the coupling of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> factor with
wind direction. Coupling of ns-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> revealed a good correlation for B (0.70) and B.reg (0.63) (Fig. S6). In
all cases, an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for combined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
as compared to individual ions indicates that both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCl were
synchronously neutralized by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
present in the fine mode, they are expected to be in the form of their
respective ammonium salts (Harrison and Pio, 1983). Thus, the dominating
salts were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for AS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the BB air mass, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SA and its
sub-branches.</p>
      <p id="d1e5345">The organic speciation revealed that AS organics were BBOA; BB (both B and B.reg) organics were a mix of the three; and SA organics were BBOA, wherein L, R1, and
R2 organics were BBOA while R3 organics were both HOA and BBOA.</p>
      <p id="d1e5348">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the SA air mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">127.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were the highest, followed by those in BB (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
then those in the AS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">68.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) air mass. BB is representative of B.reg only,
as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data for the B air mass were not available. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data for AS were also
scarce. The SA aerosols exhibited less ageing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h) compared
to B.reg. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.58</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h), but both were representative of aged
aerosols. Ageing was not calculated for AS due to very little data
availability.</p>
      <p id="d1e5465">To determine the presence of biomass burning and traffic emissions, BCwb
(wood-burning component) and BCff (traffic component) for all air masses
were determined, based on aethalometer data, as per Sandradewi et al. (2008). The contributions of BCwb and BCff are summarized in Table S4. Since
fossil fuel sources are active year-round, there was a strong presence
of BCff, ranging from 70 % to 86 %. However, biomass burning is only
active during certain specific times for short durations and is very
prominent in the north-western direction for the SA air masses. It was observed
that the more distant air masses exhibited a higher BCwb contribution
compared to those originating within proximity. Hence, while L was
associated with 13.9 % BCwb, R3 exhibited 29.2 % BCwb. The BCwb
contribution for A and BB air masses was 21 %. It can thus be concluded
that both biomass burning and traffic emissions are important sources
contributing to the chemical composition of the various air masses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Diurnal variation in chemical species and probable sources</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>The southern Asian air mass</title>
      <p id="d1e5483">This air mass ranked highest in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration compared to
other branches. Locally (i.e. for L), the source for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be
attributed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gas from the nearby agricultural fields of the Indian
Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) (Sharma et al., 2014). For R1, R2, and
R3, sharp spikes in early morning hours seen in the diurnal patterns of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate its formation from ammonia as a result of
industrial exhaust of untreated ammonia. This is because its diurnal
variation is very similar to the diurnal of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions of an industrial
origin (Wang et al., 2015). A very prominent feature of the SA that made it
distinct from the other two air masses was the presence of high chloride
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the SA branch can be attributed to
several factors: (a) Khewra salt mines in Pakistan that might contribute to high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in other branches compared to L; (b) locally, plastic burning,
refuse burning, and soil dispersion; (c) biomass burning, which is a very
prominent feature of the SA branch, as indicated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and
also by a large number of fire counts from MODIS fire-count data
(Bhattu and Tripathi, 2015), dominantly in Punjab, Haryana, and a few places in
Pakistan; (e) coal-based thermal power plants in Delhi, Punjab, Haryana, and
Pakistan; and (f) small- and medium-scale metal processing industries in Delhi,
Punjab, and Haryana, where HCl is used in a pickling process of hot and cold
rolling of steel sheets and acid recovery from fume generation is not
practised (Jaiprakash et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e5669">As far as the increase in chloride with the increasing length of
trajectories is concerned, the most plausible explanation is biomass
burning. It is pointed out in Sect. 3.2 that BCwb contribution
increases as the air mass trajectories become distant, a feature similar to
chloride emissions. There was a marked similarity in the diurnal patterns of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions such that the sequence of [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] for
SA sub-branches was also valid for [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], indicating the formation
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may also be emitted directly from cement plants
(Cheney et al., 1983) in Punjab. The equilibrium constant for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
more sensitive to ambient temperature than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as a result of
which, during the daytime, a large amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dissociates to form
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCl if the temperature exceeds 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Kaneyasu et al.,
1999). The diurnal patterns of both [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]
exhibited a sharp decrease after 08:00 LT (all times listed in the paper are in local time, UTC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5:30) in the morning, which is obvious, since
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the SA air mass is mostly associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At the
same time [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] showed an increase between 09:00 and 10:00 and then
started decreasing, but the rate of decrease was lower than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is expected, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is more stable
than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kaneyasu et al., 1999). During winter, the ambient
temperature drops slightly below 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the morning hours, increases sharply after 08:00 to reach a maximum at 14:00, and then again
starts decreasing and reaches around 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at midnight (Gani et
al., 2019). Since during winters, the air mass comes mostly from the
north-western direction of the SA air mass, it is evident that the formation and
dissociation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were governed by the ambient temperature at the
receptor site.</p>
      <?pagebreak page6961?><p id="d1e5947">The reduction in chloride concentrations at midday can also be
attributed to sulfate substitution mechanism, when sulfate formation
enhances, and was also marked by the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio greater
than 2 for L, R1, R2, and R3. This is valid especially for L, wherein
[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] increased significantly. However, the diurnal patterns of
[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] did not resemble each other,
indicating that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be present in small amounts, but
primarily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is associated elsewhere. Hence, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
combined form can be expressed in two ways: (a) small amounts of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and (b) mostly in combination with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus,
the sharp jump in [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] in locally originated air masses in the
late morning and afternoon hours may be attributed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in India are primarily attributed to power generation
plants that make use of coal combustion as the chief source (Reddy and
Venkataraman, 2002), followed by transportation. Such coal-based power
plants are located in the IGP, with a high concentration in Haryana.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolves readily in water and can form sulfite ion, which in the
presence of ozone can form sulfate ion (Erickson et al., 1977).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formed from the reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ozone can react
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which combines with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> again
to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Stelson and Seinfeld, 1982; Seinfeld, 1986).
Since the ozone spiked during the daytime (10:00–16:00), more sulfate
formation was seen when ozone was maximum. The diurnal variation for ozone
is explained in Gaur et al. (2014) for Kanpur, where a spike in ozone levels
was seen during 10:00–16:00. A peak in sulfate concentration was also
previously observed for the foggy period in Kanpur at 10:00 due to the
resumption of photochemical activity after fog dissipation (Chakraborty et
al., 2015). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in SA branches may also combine with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is produced in biomass burning. Evidence for the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
along with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the accumulation mode is reported in Fuzzi et al. (2007). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>emissions may also be associated
with secondary formation for R1, R2, and R3 due to industrial emissions
from metal product manufacturing industries in Punjab and Haryana;
large-scale manufacturing of porcelain insulators; switchgear in Islamabad
(Jaiprakash et al., 2017); and steel rolling mills in Iran, Iraq, and Turkey
and Punjab.</p>
      <p id="d1e6342">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels were very high for SA. The high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
SA can be explained by the non-ideal burning of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions due to mining equipment in the coal mines in Pakistan, leading to
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (Chakraborty et al., 2015). It is mentioned in
Sect. 3.2 that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in the SA branch are very high.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> neutralizes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simultaneously with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
however, the correlation of [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] with [ns-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] is
moderate for SA. Therefore, it is expected that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might be
associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, since biomass burning results
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Fuzzi et al., 2007). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibit a high affinity for nitrate during neutralization
reactions, thus aiding in particulate nitrate formation (Bi et al., 2011).
This is in addition to other nitrate sources that are discussed above along
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources for SA.</p>
      <p id="d1e6584">The BC concentrations were highest for SA, followed by those in AS and then
those in BB. The biomass burning in the SA air mass could be a major source of BC
besides power plants, cement plants, local traffic, and industries. The POA
emissions for SA followed the order <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The spikes during the early morning
hours and nighttime of the POA diurnal profile may be attributed to lower
boundary layer heights during the two periods. BC and POA were well
correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for R3, indicating that they come from
primary emissions. The diurnal profiles for all branches were similar, which
shows a decline as the day proceeds, followed by an increase as the night
proceeds. OOA was present significantly in all the three branches but is
maximum for SA. Its diurnal variation resembled that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicative of its semi-volatile nature. OOA and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlations were strongest for L (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
followed by R2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), R3 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and R1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>The Bay of Bengal air mass</title>
      <p id="d1e6770">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] was lower in this air mass compared to that in SA. For
both of the BB branches, fossil fuel combustion was the most likely source
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as fossil fuel emissions dominate the IGP. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for BB was not
correlated with ns-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and may be present in the
form of methyl chloride, methylene chloride, carbon tetrachloride, and
tetrachloroethene (Ho et al., 2004).</p>
      <p id="d1e6819">Fossil fuel combustion from coal plants along the IGP can be explained as a
common source for both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions, leading to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This
was also seen in the diurnal profiles of [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and
[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], both of which exhibited a sharp spike in the early morning
hours between 10:00 and 16:00. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, as explained for SA via
photochemical oxidation by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in combination with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, can lead to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. For the B.reg branch, the diurnal profiles
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited double spikes (M pattern,
which is a typical feature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile for traffic emissions) during
heavy traffic hours (06:00–08:00 and around 16:00–19:00), indicating
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. NO from automobile exhaust can also
form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in three ways catalytic convertors (Gandhi and Shelf, 1991),
which in combination with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, formed due to pyrolysis of sulfide
fuels and subsequent oxidation, can lead to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e7104">The correlation of [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] with [ns-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] was appreciably
high for both B and B.reg. For both these branches, the fossil fuel
combustion resulting in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in combination with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Rajput et al., 2015; Pan et al., 2016) can lead to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. This is also evident from the diurnal profile
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that shows a very similar pattern to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
is expected to be in the form of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The diurnal profiles of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show a decline as the temperature increases during the day
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> converts back to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to its semi-volatile
nature.</p>
      <p id="d1e7255">The BC concentration in BB air masses was considerably lower than in the SA
air masses. The missing points in the diurnal variability in BC for the B region
are on account of the unavailability of aethalometer data. The BC in the IGP can
be emitted from industries (as for B), traffic (as for B.reg), and natural
sources (Derwent et al., 2001). For B and B.reg, the B.reg branch was
subjected to a longer duration of anthropogenic influence compared to B,
which also spent considerable time on the water; hence after the early
morning hours,<?pagebreak page6962?> when the various fresh emissions start increasing, the
magnitude of POA for B.reg exceeds B. However, POA for BB was very low
compared to SA. For B.reg, the spike in OOA during daytime hours was very
similar to that of odd oxygen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for Delhi. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profile for Delhi is given in Tiwari et al. (2015), indicating its
production by local photochemistry despite the increase in boundary layer
height in the afternoon. The similarity in OOA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diurnal profiles was also noted for Kanpur (Chakraborty et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>3.3.3</label><title>The Arabian Sea air mass</title>
      <p id="d1e7308">Chloride amounts were very low for AS compared to that in SA.
Biomass burning as indicated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements seems to be the
main <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contributor to AS and might be associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
is also emitted along with it.</p>
      <p id="d1e7355">Similar to the cases of the L branch in the case of the SA air mass and the BB
air mass, the power stations in Gujarat and Rajasthan lead to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions. Since the power plants in this region, over which the AS air mass
traverses, are relatively small in number, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is much
lower compared to that in the BB air masses. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
subsequently lead to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, which was the main
salt present in this branch and was also evident from the high correlation
between the two ions. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be formed due to
emissions from both power plants and traffic (similar to B.reg). Traffic
emissions can be understood from the M pattern in diurnal profiles of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, though the variation was not very
pronounced and might be suppressed due to power plant emissions. The
traffic signal was more clearly implied by the diurnal profile of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for AS, as seen in Fig. S2. The correlation of
[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] with [ns-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] was very poor for AS, indicating
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might be associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, similar to B.reg.</p>
      <p id="d1e7552">Both BC and POA for the AS air mass were less than in the SA air mass. However,
compared to BB, BC was slightly higher and POA was comparable. BC was likely
of an industrial origin. The POA diurnal profile was similar to the other air
masses. Similar to B.reg, the OOA diurnal pattern resembled that of odd
oxygen, where the odd-oxygen profile is reported in Tiwari et al. (2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e7555">Thus, the direct emission sources and the precursors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) that lead to particulate matter formation
strongly impacted the chemical properties of aerosols. The chemical
properties of aerosol also impacted the hygroscopicity of aerosols, as is
discussed in the following section.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Impact of chemical composition on the hygroscopicity of air
masses</title>
      <p id="d1e7623">This study provides the first long-term estimation of aerosol hygroscopicity
in the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> regime. The mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was approximately the same for all the
air masses, which is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for AS,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for BB, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SA) and in line with the
global average value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for continental aerosols (Andreae
and Rosenfeld, 2008; Petters and Kreidenweis, 2007; Pöschl et al., 2009;
Pringle et al., 2010). Including BC in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> calculations leads to a difference
of 10 % in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on average, shifting the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.32 to 0.29. The BC
mass fraction and volume fractions were 10 % and 9 %, respectively. Thus,
the change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the introduction of BC was not significant.</p>
      <p id="d1e7729"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> varied from 0.13 to 0.77, and there was a difference in the diurnal variation
in the hygroscopicity parameter for the various air masses (Fig. 4). A
similar finding was observed in China, with a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.3, varying in
the range 0.1–0.5 (Rose et al., 2010). Recently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
also reported for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for Delhi based on beta attenuation monitor
(BAM) measurements of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang and Chen, 2019), using an indirect
method in the absence of direct measurements. Thus, the dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on
size cannot be underestimated for Delhi and should be dealt with in the
future.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e7792">Diurnal variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with time. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> is for AS, BB, and SA; panel <bold>(b)</bold> is for BB branches (B and
B.reg), and panel <bold>(c)</bold> is for SA branches (L, R1, R2, and R3).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6953/2020/acp-20-6953-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e7818">Variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with size has been seen in several places in the world; e.g.
at 97 % RH, mass growth factors of 6.95 and 9.78 were reported for the
size ranges 0.53–1.6 and 1.6–5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, respectively, on the
Slovenian coast (Turšič et al., 2006). Aitken mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.25, while the
accumulation mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.45 for Beijing (Gunthe et al., 2011). An increase
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the higher size regime points to the fact that the organic fraction
is higher in the smaller size range, while the inorganic fraction increases
substantially with size.</p>
      <p id="d1e7857">In the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> size range, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.1 indicates secondary organic
aerosol, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> varied from 0.01 to 0.8 for biomass-burning aerosols in lab studies
(Petters et al., 2009). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> varied from 0.15 to 0.25, with lower values (around
0.16) being observed during the night, when biomass-burning particles prevailed
during wintertime in Athens, Greece (Psichoudaki et al., 2018). Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values for Delhi can represent both secondary formation and biomass burning.
This is true for Delhi, which had both POA and OOA in all the air masses,
while BBOA was present in AS and SA air masses, as detailed in the preceding
sections on chemical properties.</p>
      <?pagebreak page6963?><p id="d1e7897">An important observation for all branches is that when the inorganic volume
fraction (of dominant salt) increased (Fig. S2), during the times when
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was high (Fig. 4), or when the organic volume fraction decreased (Fig. S2), a dip in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6) was seen, implying that a larger size
regime was available for activation. The diurnal variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4)
more strongly followed the diurnal pattern of the dominant inorganic salts
for a cluster (Fig. S2), since the hygroscopicity parameters for inorganic
salts are considerably higher than those of organics. Pearson correlation
coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) values between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the salt volume fractions revealed that
the diurnal patterns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were governed dominantly by volume fractions of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.85) for AS, moderately by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.55) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.49) for BB,
and dominantly by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SA air masses. For the two BB branches, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
of the B branch was governed dominantly by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.78)
and moderately by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.57) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.54) for B.reg. For SA air masses, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of R1, R2, and R3 was governed
dominantly by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.71, 0.89, and 0.95) and jointly by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.65) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.73) for L.</p>
      <p id="d1e8206">High volume fractions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may
be attributed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions due to power
plant emissions and traffic. In the SA sub-branches (Fig. 4), the spike in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> during the early morning (07:00–08:00) exhibited the sequence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and the lower spike in late evening (18:00–22:00) exhibited the sequence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and is attributed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. This
implies that during the morning, R3 aerosols were most hygroscopic, while L
aerosols were least hygroscopic, while after 09:00, L aerosols were most
hygroscopic and R3 aerosols were the least hygroscopic. The flatter curve of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be attributed to two factors: (a) the chloride contribution of distant
trajectories decreased very steeply with time compared to the local
emissions, and (b) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of L was also supplemented substantially by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the source activities by which the chemical
properties of aerosols are shaped impacted the hygroscopicity parameter
tremendously. This consequently impacted the size regime of aerosols
available for activation and is discussed in the following section.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Impact of governing parameters on CCN estimates of air masses</title>
      <p id="d1e8427">CCN number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for SA (22 526 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 439) was higher
compared to that in BB (12 526 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5626) and AS (11 089 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6650), where
values (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are given at 0.4 % SS. Amongst the SA sub-branches,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> followed an increasing order, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (18 810 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9434) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (20 469 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 580) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(23 736 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 739) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (24 053 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 743), while for
the B branches, the order of increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (11 699 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4900) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (14 088 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6506) at 0.4 % SS. Correspondingly, the activated fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
followed the sequence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AS</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), wherein for
SA sub-branches, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.694</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.692</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and for BB, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 0.4 % SS. Mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all branches at 0.1 %, 0.4 %, and 0.8 % SS
are detailed in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. The total number concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) followed the sequence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AS</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (20 558 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9654) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (20 864 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9731) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(31 406 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 168), and for SA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (27 009 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 651) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (30 974 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 223) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (32 772 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 475) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (33 371 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 989), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(19 025 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7704) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (24 333 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 956). Mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for all branches are listed in Table S2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e9378">Mean values of CCN number concentrations (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at
0.1 %, 0.4 %, and 0.8 % SS for all clusters.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.93}[.93]?><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">CCN at 0.1 % SS </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">CCN at 0.4 % SS </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">CCN at 0.8 % SS </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3669</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2480</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11 089</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6650</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15 339</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8149</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4558</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1945</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12 526</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5626</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16 329</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7385</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 245</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6352</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22 526</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13 439</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27 374</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14 902</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4469</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1885</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11 699</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4900</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14 892</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5883</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B.reg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4726</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2043</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14 088</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6506</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19 040</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8993</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4612</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18 810</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9434</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23 161</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10 845</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 921</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6843</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24 053</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14 743</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28 914</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16 265</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11 318</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6071</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23 736</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13 739</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28 926</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15 111</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9555</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6077</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20 469</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10 580</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25 971</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11 963</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e9687">Mean activated fractions at 0.1 %, 0.4 %, and 0.8 %
SS for all clusters.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.1 % SS </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.4 % SS </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.8 % SS </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B.reg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page6964?><p id="d1e10012">High values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Delhi are consistent with other polluted
regions in the world. The relevant statistics for two highly polluted sites,
namely Beijing and Kanpur, are presented by Gunthe et al. (2011) and
Bhattu and Tripathi (2015), respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7660</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3460</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
900–27 000 (in cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 0.46 % SS and in the range 0.18 %–0.6 % SS,
respectively. The high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistent with the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Correspondingly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 16 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9100 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 000
(cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Even though high number concentrations of CCN and condensation nuclei (CN) have been
reported, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was not seen to be so high. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.46 % SS and 0.86 % SS,
respectively. For Kanpur, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was reported as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.018–0.54
for 0.18 %–0.60 % SS. However for Delhi, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 0.19 for
AS, at 0.1 % SS, to 0.86 for R1, at 0.8 % SS, implying that even at low SS,
a considerably large number of particles were activated, and at high SS,
almost all particles reached the activated state. It should be noted here
that the statistics for Beijing and Kanpur correspond to the range (3–900 nm) and (14.6–680 nm), while the estimates for Delhi are given in the
(10–560 nm) range. This finding is also consistent with Wang and Chen (2019),
which states that for Delhi, activation of a 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m particle requires
SS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.015</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
for Beijing; 0.28 %–0.31 % for Asia, Africa, and South America; and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for Europe and North America. The high activated
fractions of aerosol can impact the precipitation patterns in Delhi and may
be responsible for the short, intense precipitation events and decrease in
overall rainfall. However, no study to date has validated this growing trend
with CCN measurements or estimates, and this needs to be investigated in the
future.</p>
      <p id="d1e10240">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all air masses increased as expected with an
increase in supersaturation. The variation in CCN and the activated fraction
with SS are shown in Figs. 5 and S3. The figures clearly show that even
though <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SA was far greater compared to BB and AS, the activated
fractions were fairly close. B.reg had higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but a close <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
compared to B. Similarly, L had the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> among all SA branches
but the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These features elucidate that many factors are at
play and impact <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differently. To determine the
governing parameters impacting both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the diurnal
patterns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.1 %, 0.4 %, and 0.8 %
SS; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Aitken</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Accumulation</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; and geometric mean diameter (GMD) are shown
in Figs. 6, S4, and S5.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e10442">Variation in CCN and activated fraction with SS (%)
for AS, BB, and SA air masses.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6953/2020/acp-20-6953-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e10453">Diurnal variation in <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.1 %, 0.4 %,
and 0.8 % SS; <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.1 %, 0.4 %, and 0.8 % SS; <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Aitken</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Accumulation</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.1 %, 0.4 %,
and 0.8 % SS; <bold>(e)</bold> chemical dispersion; and <bold>(f)</bold> GMD for AS, BB, and SA air
masses.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6953/2020/acp-20-6953-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e10548">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curve for SA showed a sharp diurnal feature which was not as
prominent for the other two. However, at noon, at 0.4 % and 0.8 %
SS, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dipped for SA, it rose for AS and BB (Fig. 6).
Furthermore, with the increase in supersaturation, the dip in CCN of SA
increased such that (a) at 0.1 % SS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
BB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; (b) at 0.4 % SS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
BB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; and (c) at 0.8 % SS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The explanation for this observation is that
at 0.1 % SS, the CCN was governed by the accumulation mode, but at 0.4 %
and 0.8 % SS, it was governed more by the Aitken mode. It is the Aitken
mode that dominantly governs the total number concentration, and hence it
can be said that CCN is governed by CN at a higher SS and by the accumulation
mode at low SS. This is because as supersaturation increases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increases. At low SS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm), almost
always at a 0.1 % SS, for all branches, as shown in Fig. 6d; hence the size
distribution that is integrated to get the CCN involves the accumulation
mode only. At 0.4 % SS, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was around 40–47 nm; therefore a
considerable fraction of the Aitken mode and accumulation mode was available for
activation. At 0.8 % SS, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25–30 nm; therefore,
the contribution of the Aitken mode further increases and the accumulation mode is
also available as usual. These findings are also true for BB branches (B and
B.reg) and SA branches (L, R1, R2, and R3), as shown in Fig. S4. It is the
low value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to other places that is responsible for high
CCN. As explained in Sect. 3.4, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is largely associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at other places such as Kanpur varied from 50 to 200 nm, for SS ranging
from 0.18 to 0.60 (Bhattu and Tripathi, 2015), compared to which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Delhi is
lower (17–142 nm, for SS ranging from 0.1 % to 0.8 %), implying that a larger
regime is available for activation. It is pertinent to mention here that the
dip in CCN for SA at midday and the peak at the same time for AS and BB
can be attributed to the following. (a) The dip in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Accumulation</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SA
at midday was much more prominent compared to AS and BB. (b) At
midday, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Aitken</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SA also decreased, while it increased for AS
and BB. Thus, the dip in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was strengthened by the simultaneous dip
of both the Aitken and accumulation modes, while the peak in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for AS
and BB was a manifestation of the dominant peak in Aitken modes. Similar
features were also exhibited for sub-branches of BB and SA. A deeper insight
reveals that the dip in number concentration at midday for SA was most
aptly seen in the diurnal pattern of POA (which is the most dominant
NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species) and, to quite a good extent, in other NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species
barring the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion. Similarly, the peak in the Aitken mode for AS and
BB can be attributed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OOA
concentrations (the dominating<?pagebreak page6965?> species in the respective branches). Thus,
the source activities and trajectory pathways impact CCN concentration at
the receptor site.</p>
      <?pagebreak page6966?><p id="d1e10887">The diurnal pattern for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a dip in the midday hours for all
the air masses even though <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at midday for AS and BB peaked
during midday hours. The time of dip in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (more prominent at 0.4 %
and 0.8 % SS) occurred earlier for AS compared to that for BB and SA
(Fig. 6). This was governed by the time of dip in the
GMD of the three branches. The
GMD diurnal variation was very similar to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values between GMD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> listed in Table S3 also point to
the same result. Thus, even though a dip in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should correspond with an
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and vice versa, this does not usually happen, as the
change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is less compared to the shift in size distribution such that
not only the highest number concentration values but also the diameter at
which this occurs change, thereby changing the number available for
activation. For example, in Fig. 7 two different size distributions for the AS
air mass at 02:00 and 11:00 are compared. At 02:00 and 11:00, the following
characteristics were noted: (a) GMD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">02</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">83.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm (GSD – geometric standard deviation), which
is considerably higher than GMD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47.18</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm; (b) GSD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">02</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm, which is nearly the same as
GSD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.62</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm; (c) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">02</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm,
which is slightly higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm (at 0.4 %
SS); (d) CN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">02</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: 15 849 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9269 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is lower than
CN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: 25 873 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9840 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; (e) CN_Aitken<inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">02</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9819</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5945</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is lower than
CN_Aitken<inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: 22 376 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9693 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; (f) CN_Accumulation<inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">02</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5729</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3684</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is higher
than CN_Accumulation<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3311</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1569</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; (g) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">02</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is considerably higher than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.4 % SS; and (h) CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">02</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>:
11 595 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6710 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is higher than CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8946</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3899</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.4 % SS. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 02:00 is higher
than that at 11:00. A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease should correspond to a CCN increase, but
the magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm is very small. The decrease
in GMD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GMD</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm), on the other hand, is very high, with
negligible changes in GSD. At 02:00, since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was considerably less
than GSD, most of the particles are counted for activation. At 11:00, since
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and GMD were very close, nearly 50 % of particles are not
available for activation. The very high Aitken mode concentration at 11:00
(higher than that at 02:00) was not available for activation at both the
times. Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> here is governed by the accumulation mode, which
was higher at 02:00, thus making <inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher. In this scenario,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> go hand in hand. However, there also exists a second
possibility; e.g. for the SA branch, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at 0.4 % SS, at 08:00 is
higher than that at 05:00, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 08:00 is lower than that at
05:00 (Fig. 6). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was governed at these times by the Aitken mode, which
was higher at 08:00, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is governed by the GMD, which was lower at
08:00. Therefore, it is established that CCN is governed by CN (dominantly by
either the Aitken or accumulation mode as the case may be), while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is governed by GMD.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e11683">Comparison of two size distribution profiles at different
times of day for AS branch at 02:00 and 11:00.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/6953/2020/acp-20-6953-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e11692">At this junction, it is also pertinent to mention how chemical dispersion
and parameters governing CCN are interconnected. The standard deviation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is often used as an estimate of the degree of
heterogeneity (chemical dispersion) of particles (Psichoudaki et al., 2018;
Lance et al., 2013). The chemical dispersion for all air masses and
their sub-branches is shown in Figs. 6, S4, and S5. The chemical dispersion
for the SA air mass during the early hours (06:00–08:00) coincided with chloride
emissions, and late at night, after 20:00, it coincided with POA and OOA emissions.
During the time of high chloride emissions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> also peaked, since inorganics
are associated with high hygroscopicity, while during the late hours, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
dropped due to an increase in organics associated with low hygroscopicity.
The diurnal patterns of the activated fraction, GMD, and chemical dispersion were
also similar. This implies that higher heterogeneity shifts GMD towards a high
value, thereby increasing the available regime for activation, and
vice versa. There was no discernible pattern noted for the other air masses.</p>
      <p id="d1e11737">It is hereby established that aerosol physical and chemical properties, and
their time evolution, are tightly linked with each other. The indirect
impact of chemical composition on CCN and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is manifested in two ways: (a) NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species impact the diurnal patterns of Aitken and accumulation
modes, which in turn impact CCN, and (b) NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species impact <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, hence
subsequently CCN, by impacting the size regime available for activation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e11785">Long-term measurements of NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species and size distribution data were
carried out in New Delhi. The air masses originated from SA (L, R1, R2, and
R3), BB (B and B.reg), and AS. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated using the mixing rule, and the
bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was assumed for the entire size distribution. Using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and size
distribution data, CCN estimates were obtained. The SA air mass was the most
contaminated air mass, followed by BB and then AS. This resulted in higher
NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (both Aitken and accumulation modes), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SA, followed by those in BB and then those in AS. The most dominant
salts turned out to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for AS,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for BB, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SA.
The AS, B, and L branches were completely neutralized, while B.reg, R1, R2, and R3
were partially neutralized. The diurnal variations in NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species
were governed by source activities' aerosol precursors, like <inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The high PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
for Delhi, which exceeds the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, can be
mitigated only by controlling both the primary emissions and precursors. To
address the situation justly, the following is lacking: (a) data
listing measurements of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from various industries in
India and Asia, (b) a description of the chemical constituents of aerosol that
are emitted, both qualitatively and quantitatively, and (c) a definition of emission
limits and compliance with them.</p>
      <p id="d1e12020">The mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was the same for all air masses, with the
diurnal variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> governed by chemical species and, thus, source
activities. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diurnal trends impacted the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diurnal trend, which in
turn affected the available regime for activation. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diurnal
patterns were driven by the<?pagebreak page6967?> accumulation mode at a lower SS and Aitken mode with
an increase in SS, depending upon <inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which decreases with an
increase in SS. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained for Delhi was lower than that seen at
other places in the IGP, for example, Kanpur. The activated fraction for Delhi
was very high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.4 % SS for R1), with the means of
activated fractions varying between 0.19 and 0.87, for SS varying from
0.1 % to 0.8 %, whereby their diurnal patterns were governed by GMD. A CCN
measurement study with a CCN counter in the future can help verify the
estimates, and a closure ratio may be determined. However, in the absence of
long-term cloud condensation nuclei counter (CCNC) measurements, the importance of these findings cannot
be neglected. These results can serve as valuable inputs to GCMs to better
quantify precipitation. The high NRPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loading and activated fractions
are bound to significantly impact precipitation over Delhi, impact the aerosol
radiation budget, and have indirect effects and need to be investigated
thoroughly in the future. These investigations may answer the short intense
precipitation events occurring over Delhi and the decrease in the overall
rainfall over the past half-century.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e12120">All data pertaining to this study can be downloaded from <uri>http://web.iitd.ac.in/~gazala/rawdata_arubetal2020.xlsx</uri> (Arub et al., 2020).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e12126">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6953-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6953-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e12135">LHR, JSP, GH, and ZA designed the study. ZA, SG, and SB carried out the data
collection. ZA carried out data processing and analysis. ZA and GH carried
out the interpretation of the results. ZA wrote the paper and was assisted
by SB, LHR, and GH in reviewing the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e12141">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e12147">We are thankful to the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD) for
institutional support. We are grateful to all students and staff members of
the Aerosol Research and Characterization Laboratory at IITD for their constant
support. We are thankful to Philip Croteau (Aerodyne Research) for always
providing timely technical support for the ACSM.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e12152">This paper was edited by Veli-Matti Kerminen and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation
interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active
aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arub, Z., Bhandari, S., Gani, S., Apte, J. S., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., and  Habib, G.:
rawdata_arubetal2020.xlsx, available at: <uri>http://web.iitd.ac.in/~gazala/rawdata_arubetal2020.xlsx</uri>, last access: 6 June 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Asa-Awuku, A., Moore, R. H., Nenes, A., Bahreini, R., Holloway, J. S.,
Brock, C. A., Middlebrook, A. M., Ryerson, T. B., Jimenez, J. L., Decarlo, P. F., Hecobian, A., Weber, R. J., Stickel, R., Tanner, D. J., and Huey, L. G.: Airborne cloud condensation nuclei
measurements during the 2006 Texas Air Quality Study, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 116, 1–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014874" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014874</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., Troe, J., and IUPAC Subcommittee: Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume II – gas phase reactions of organic species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3625–4055, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bhandari, S., Gani, S., Patel, K., Wang, D. S., Soni, P., Arub, Z., Habib, G., Apte, J. S., and Hildebrandt Ruiz, L.: Sources and atmospheric dynamics of organic aerosol in New Delhi, India: insights from receptor modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 735–752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-735-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-735-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bhattu, D. and Tripathi, S. N.: Inter-seasonal variability in
size-resolved CCN properties at Kanpur, India, Atmos. Environ., 85,
161–168, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.016</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bhattu, D. and Tripathi, S. N.: CCN closure study: Effects of aerosol
chemical composition and mixing state, J. Geophys Res.-Atmos., 120, 766–783, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021978" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021978</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bi, X., Zhang, G., Li, L., Wang, X., Li, M., Sheng, G., Fu, J., and Zhou, Z.:
Mixing state of biomass burning particles by single particle aerosol mass
spectrometer in the urban area of PRD, China, Atmos.
Environ., 45, 3447–3453,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.034</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P.,   Kerminen, V.-M.,  Kondo,  Y.,   Liao, H.,  Lohmann,  U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen,  S. K., Boschung,  J., Nauels,  A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bougiatioti, A., Fountoukis, C., Kalivitis, N., Pandis, S. N., Nenes, A., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Cloud condensation nuclei measurements in the marine boundary layer of the Eastern Mediterranean: CCN closure and droplet growth kinetics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7053–7066, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7053-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7053-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bougiatioti, A., Nenes, A., Fountoukis, C., Kalivitis, N., Pandis, S. N., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Size-resolved CCN distributions and activation kinetics of aged continental and marine aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8791–8808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8791-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8791-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Braga, R. C., Rosenfeld, D., Weigel, R., Jurkat, T., Andreae, M. O., Wendisch, M., Pöschl, U., Voigt, C., Mahnke, C., Borrmann, S., Albrecht, R. I., Molleker, S., Vila, D. A., Machado, L. A. T., and Grulich, L.: Further evidence for CCN aerosol concentrations determining the height of warm rain and ice initiation in convective clouds over the Amazon basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14433–14456, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14433-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-14433-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brock, C. A., Wagner, N. L., Anderson, B. E., Beyersdorf, A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Diskin, G. S., Gordon, T. D., Jimenez, J. L., Lack, D. A., Liao, J., Markovic, M. Z., Middlebrook, A. M., Perring, A. E., Richardson, M. S., Schwarz, J. P., Welti, A., Ziemba, L. D., and Murphy, D. M.: Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 2: Sensitivity of aerosol optical depth to relative humidity and aerosol parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5009–5019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5009-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5009-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chakraborty, A., Bhattu, D., Gupta, T., Tripathi, S. N., and Canagaratna,
M. R.: Real-time measurements of ambient aerosols in a polluted Indian city:
Sources, characteristics, and processing of organic aerosols during foggy
and nonfoggy periods, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
9006–9019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023419" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023419</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chakraborty, A., Gupta, T., and Tripathi, S. N.: Chemical composition and
characteristics of ambient aerosols and rainwater residues during Indian
summer monsoon: Insight from aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos.
Environ., 136, 144–155, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.024</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Wild, O., Wang, Y., Ran, L., Teich, M., Größ, J., Wang, L., Spindler, G., Herrmann, H., van Pinxteren, D., McFiggans, G., and Wiedensohler, A.: The influence of impactor size cut-off shift caused by
hygroscopic growth on particulate matter loading and composition
measurements, Atmos. Environ., 195, 141–148,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.049</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cheney, J. L., Conner, W. D., Bennett, R. L., Duke, D. L., and Walters, C.
L.: Formation of a detached plume from a cement plant, NTIS, Springfield,
VA, USA, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Derwent, R. G., Ryall, D. B., Jennings, S. G., Spain, T. G., and Simmonds,
P. G.: Black carbon aerosol and carbon monoxide in European regionally
polluted air masses at Mace Head, Ireland during 1995–1998, Atmos.
Environ., 35, 6371–6378,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00394-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00394-6</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G. D.: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle
Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) model access via NOAA ARL READY website,
NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD, 25, available at: <uri>http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php</uri> (last access: 18 May 2020), 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Du, H. H., Kong, L. D., Cheng, T., Chen, J., Yang, X., Zhang, R., Han, Z., Yan, Z., and Ma, Y.: Insights into ammonium particle-to-gas conversion: non-sulfate
ammonium coupling with nitrate and chloride, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 10,
589–595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2010.04.0034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2010.04.0034</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Curtius, J., Drewnick, F., Schneider, J.,
Kürten, A., Rose, D., Andreae, M. O., Borrmann, S., and Pöschl, U.: Enhanced organic mass fraction and
decreased hygroscopicity of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) during new
particle formation events, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040930" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL040930</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Engelhart, G. J., Hennigan, C. J., Miracolo, M. A., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity of fresh primary and aged biomass burning aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7285–7293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Erickson, R. E., Yates, L. M., Clark, R. L., and McEwen, D.: The reaction
of sulfur dioxide with ozone in water and its possible atmospheric
significance, Atmos. Environ., 11, 813–817,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(77)90043-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(77)90043-9</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Esri, Garmin International: World Countries (Generalized), available at:
<uri>https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=170b5e6529064b8d9275168687880359</uri> (last access: 17 May 2020),
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fuzzi, S., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Cavalli, F., Emblico, L., Mircea,
M., Andreae, M. O., Trebs, I., Hoffer, A., Guyon, P., Artaxo, P., Rizzo, L. V., Lara, L. L., Pauliquevis, T., Maenhaut, W., Raes, N., Chi, X., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Soto-García, L. L., Claeys, M., Kourtchev, I., Rissler, J., Swietlicki, E., Tagliavini, E., Schkolnik, G., Falkovich, A. H., Rudich, Y., Fisch, G., and Gatti, L. V.: Overview of the inorganic and organic composition
of size-segregated aerosol in Rondonia, Brazil, from the biomass-burning
period to the onset of the wet season, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006741" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006741</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gandhi, H. S. and Shelef, M.: Effects of sulphur on noble metal automotive
catalysts, Appl. Catal., 77, 175–186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-9834(91)80063-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0166-9834(91)80063-3</ext-link>,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gani, S., Bhandari, S., Seraj, S., Wang, D. S., Patel, K., Soni, P., Arub, Z., Habib, G., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., and Apte, J. S.: Submicron aerosol composition in the world's most polluted megacity: the Delhi Aerosol Supersite study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6843–6859, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6843-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6843-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gaur, A., Tripathi, S. N., Kanawade, V. P., Tare, V., and Shukla, S. P.:
Four-year measurements of trace gases (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at an urban
location, Kanpur, in Northern India, J. Atmos.
Chem., 71, 283–301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-014-9295-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-014-9295-8</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guhathakurta, P., Rajeevan, M., Sikka, D. R., and Tyagi, A.: Observed
changes in southwest monsoon rainfall over India during 1901–2011,
Int. J. Climatol., 35, 1881–1898,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.4095</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gunn, R. and Phillips, B. B.: An experimental investigation of the effect
of air pollution on the initiation of rain, J. Meteorol., 14,
272–280, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1957)014&lt;0272:AEIOTE&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1957)014&lt;0272:AEIOTE&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gunthe, S. S., King, S. M., Rose, D., Chen, Q., Roldin, P., Farmer, D. K., Jimenez, J. L., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., Martin, S. T., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in pristine tropical rainforest air of Amazonia: size-resolved measurements and modeling of atmospheric aerosol composition and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7551–7575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7551-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7551-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gunthe, S. S., Rose, D., Su, H., Garland, R. M., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Kuwata, M., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhu, T., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) from fresh and aged air pollution i<?pagebreak page6969?>n the megacity region of Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11023–11039, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11023-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11023-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Habib, G., Venkataraman, C., Chiapello, I., Ramachandran, S., Boucher, O.,
and Reddy, M. S.: Seasonal and interannual variability in absorbing
aerosols over India derived from TOMS: Relationship to regional meteorology
and emissions, Atmos. Environ., 40, 1909–1921,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.077</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harrison, R. M. and Pio, C. A.: Major ion composition and chemical
associations of inorganic atmospheric aerosols, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 17, 169–174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00109a009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00109a009</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Haynes, W. M., Lide, D. R., and Bruno, T. J. (Eds.): CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 95th Edn., CRC press, Florida, USA, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ho, K. F., Lee, S. C., Guo, H., and Tsai, W. Y.: Seasonal and diurnal
variations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere of Hong
Kong, Sci. Total Environ., 322, 155–166,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.10.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.10.004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hong, J., Häkkinen, S. A. K., Paramonov, M., Äijälä, M., Hakala, J., Nieminen, T., Mikkilä, J., Prisle, N. L., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Bilde, M., Kerminen, V.-M., and Petäjä, T.: Hygroscopicity, CCN and volatility properties of submicron atmospheric aerosol in a boreal forest environment during the summer of 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4733–4748, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4733-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-4733-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jaiprakash, Singhai, A., Habib, G., Raman, R. S., and Gupta, T.: Chemical
characterization of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol in Delhi and source apportionment using
positive matrix factorization, Environ. Sci. Pollut.
R., 24, 445–462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7708-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-016-7708-8</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kalapureddy, M. C. R., Kaskaoutis, D. G., Ernest Raj, P., Devara, P. C. S.,
Kambezidis, H. D., Kosmopoulos, P. G., and  Nastos, P. T.: Identification of
aerosol type over the Arabian Sea in the premonsoon season during the
Integrated Campaign for Aerosols, Gases and Radiation Budget
(ICARB), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D17203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011826" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD011826</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaneyasu, N., Yoshikado, H., Mizuno, T., Sakamoto, K., and Soufuku, M.:
Chemical forms and sources of extremely high nitrate and chloride in winter
aerosol pollution in the Kanto Plain of Japan, Atmos.
Environ., 33, 1745–1756,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00396-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00396-3</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lance, S., Raatikainen, T., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Yu, X.-Y., Alexander, M. L., Stolzenburg, M. R., McMurry, P. H., Smith, J. N., and Nenes, A.: Aerosol mixing state, hygroscopic growth and cloud activation efficiency during MIRAGE 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5049–5062, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5049-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5049-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, S. Y., Gan, C., and Chew, B. N.: Visibility deterioration and
hygroscopic growth of biomass burning aerosols over a tropical coastal city:
a case study over Singapore's airport, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 17,
624–629, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.712" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/asl.712</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Leena, P. P., Pandithurai, G., Anilkumar, V., Murugavel, P., Sonbawne, S.
M., and Dani, K. K.: Seasonal variability in aerosol, CCN and their
relationship observed at a high altitude site in Western Ghats, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 128, 143–153,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-015-0406-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00703-015-0406-0</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Leng, C., Zhang, Q., Zhang, D., Xu, C., Cheng, T., Zhang, R., Tao, J., Chen, J., Zha, S., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Kong, L., and Gao, W.: Variations of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and aerosol activity during fog–haze episode: a case study from Shanghai, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12499–12512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12499-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12499-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Cheng, Y., Hu, M., and Han, T.: Aerosol hygroscopicity
and its impact on atmospheric visibility and radiative forcing in Guangzhou
during the 2006 PRIDE-PRD campaign, Atmos. Environ., 60, 59–67,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.016</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moorthy, K. K., Satheesh, S. K., Babu, S. S., and Dutt, C. B. S.:
Integrated campaign for aerosols, gases and radiation budget (ICARB): an
overview, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 117, 243–262,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0029-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12040-008-0029-7</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nair, V. S., Moorthy, K. K., Babu, S. S., Narasimhulu, K., Reddy, L. S. S., Reddy, R. R., Gopal, K. R., Sreekanth, V., Madhavan, B. L., and Niranjan, K.: Size segregated aerosol mass
concentration measurements over the Arabian Sea during ICARB, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 117, 315–323,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0034-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12040-008-0034-x</ext-link>, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nair, V. S., Babu, S. S., and Moorthy, K. K.: Aerosol characteristics in
the marine atmospheric boundary layer over the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea
during ICARB: Spatial distribution and latitudinal and longitudinal
gradients, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D15208,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009823" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009823</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nault, B. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Schroder, J. C., Anderson, B., Beyersdorf, A. J., Blake, D. R., Brune, W. H., Choi, Y., Corr, C. A., de Gouw, J. A., Dibb, J., DiGangi, J. P., Diskin, G. S., Fried, A., Huey, L. G., Kim, M. J., Knote, C. J., Lamb, K. D., Lee, T., Park, T., Pusede, S. E., Scheuer, E., Thornhill, K. L., Woo, J.-H., and Jimenez, J. L.: Secondary organic aerosol production from local emissions dominates the organic aerosol budget over Seoul, South Korea, during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17769–17800, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17769-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17769-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009604003981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1009604003981</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Ulbrich, I. M.,
and Worsnop, D. R.: Real-time methods for estimating organic component mass
concentrations from aerosol mass spectrometer data, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 45, 910–916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es102951k</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Padró, L. T., Moore, R. H., Zhang, X., Rastogi, N., Weber, R. J., and
Nenes, A.: Mixing state and compositional effects on CCN activity and
droplet growth kinetics of size-resolved CCN in an urban environment, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 10239–10255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10239-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10239-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pan, Y., Tian, S., Liu, D., Fang, Y., Zhu, X., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B., Michalski, G., and Wang, Y.:
Fossil fuel combustion-related emissions dominate atmospheric ammonia
sources during severe haze episodes: Evidence from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-stable isotope in
size-resolved aerosol ammonium, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 50, 8049–8056, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00634" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b00634</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page6970?><ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D., Carrico, C. M., Kreidenweis, S. M., Prenni, A. J., DeMott,
P. J., Collett Jr., J. L., and Moosmüller, H.: Cloud condensation
nucleation activity of biomass burning aerosol, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 114, D22205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pöschl, U., Rose, D., and Andreae, M. O.: Climatologies of
Cloud-Related Aerosols – Part 2: Particle Hygroscopicity and Cloud
Condensation Nucleus Activity, in: Clouds in the Perturbed Climate System: Their
Relationship to Energy Balance, Atmospheric Dynamics, and Precipitation,
58–72, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pringle, K. J., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Pöschl, U., and Lelieveld, J.: Global distribution of the effective aerosol hygroscopicity parameter for CCN activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5241–5255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5241-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5241-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Psichoudaki, M., Nenes, A., Florou, K., Kaltsonoudis, C., and Pandis, S.
N.: Hygroscopic properties of atmospheric particles emitted during
wintertime biomass burning episodes in Athens, Atmos. Environ., 178,
66–72, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.004</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rajput, P., Mandaria, A.,
Kachawa, L., Singh, D. K., Singh, A. K., and Gupta, T.: Wintertime
source-apportionment of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from Kanpur in the Indo-Gangetic plain, Climatic
Change, 1, 503–507, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ram, K., Tripathi, S. N., Sarin, M. M., and
Bhattu, D.: Primary and secondary aerosols from an urban site (Kanpur) in
the Indo-Gangetic Plain: impact on CCN, CN concentrations and optical
properties, Atmos. Environ., 89, 655–663,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.009</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reddy, M. S. and Venkataraman, C.: Inventory of aerosol and sulphur
dioxide emissions from India: I – Fossil fuel combustion, Atmos.
Environ., 36, 677–697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00463-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00463-0</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rissler, J., Swietlicki, E., Zhou, J., Roberts, G., Andreae, M. O., Gatti, L. V., and Artaxo, P.: Physical properties of the sub-micrometer aerosol over the Amazon rain forest during the wet-to-dry season transition – comparison of modeled and measured CCN concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2119–2143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2119-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-2119-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rose, D., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 1: Size-resolved measurements and implications for the modeling of aerosol particle hygroscopicity and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3365–3383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Su, H., Garland, R. M., Yang, H., Berghof, M., Cheng, Y. F., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Hu, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 2: Size-resolved aerosol chemical composition, diurnal cycles, and externally mixed weakly CCN-active soot particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2817–2836, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D.: TRMM observed first direct evidence of smoke from forest
fires inhibiting rainfall, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3105–3108,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL006066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL006066</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D.: Suppression of rain and snow by urban and industrial air
pollution, Science, 287, 1793–1796,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1793" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.287.5459.1793</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D., Lahav, R., Khain, A., and Pinsky, M.: The role of sea spray
in cleansing air pollution over ocean via cloud processes,
Science, 297, 1667–1670, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073869" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1073869</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D., Lohmann, U., Raga, G. B., O'Dowd, C. D., Kulmala, M., Fuzzi,
S., Reissell, A., and Andreae, M. O.: Flood or drought: how do aerosols affect
precipitation?, Science, 321, 1309–1313, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160606" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1160606</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Roy, A., Chatterjee, A., Sarkar, C., Das, S. K., Ghosh, S. K., and Raha,
S.: A study on aerosol-cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activation over
eastern Himalaya in India, Atmos. Res., 189, 69–81,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.01.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.01.015</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rudich, Y., Khersonsky, O., and Rosenfeld, D.: Treating clouds with a grain
of salt, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2060,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL016055</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sandradewi, J., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Perron, N., Alfarra, M. R., Lanz, V. A., Weingartner,
E., and Baltensperger, U.: Using Aerosol Light Absorption Measurements for
the Quantitative Determination of Wood Burning and Traffic Emission Contributions to Particulate Matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 3316–3323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es702253m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es702253m</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seinfeld, J. H.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics of Air Pollution,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 20, 863–863,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00151a602" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00151a602</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sharma, S. K., Kumar, M., Gupta, N. C., Saxena, M., and Mandal, T. K.:
Characteristics of ambient ammonia over Delhi, India, Meteorol.
Atmos. Phys., 124, 67–82,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-013-0299-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00703-013-0299-8</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Squires, P.: The microstructure and colloidal stability of warm clouds: Part
II – The causes of the variations in microstructure, Tellus, 10, 262–271,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1958.tb02012.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.2153-3490.1958.tb02012.x</ext-link>, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stelson, A. W. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Relative humidity and pH dependence of
the vapor pressure of ammonium nitrate-nitric acid solutions at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Atmos. Environ., 16, 993–1000,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90185-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(82)90185-8</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sullivan, R. C., Moore, M. J. K., Petters, M. D., Kreidenweis, S. M., Roberts, G. C., and Prather, K. A.: Effect of chemical mixing state on the hygroscopicity and cloud nucleation properties of calcium mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3303–3316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3303-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3303-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tao, W. K., Chen, J. P., Li, Z., Wang, C., and Zhang, C.: Impact of
aerosols on convective clouds and precipitation, Rev.
Geophys., 50, RG2001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000369" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011RG000369</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tiwari, S., Dahiya, A., and Kumar, N.: Investigation into relationships
among NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO at an urban background site in Delhi, India,
Atmos. Res., 157, 119–126,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.01.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.01.008</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Turšič, J., Podkrajšek, B., Grgić, I., Ctyroky, P., Berner,
A., Dusek, U., and Hitzenberger, R.: Chemical composition and hygroscopic
properties of size-segregated aerosol particles collected at the Adriatic
coast of Slovenia, Chemosphere, 63, 1193–1202,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.08.040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.08.040</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Cubison, M. J., Aiken, A. C., Jimenez, J. L., and Collins, D. R.: The importance of aerosol mixing state an<?pagebreak page6971?>d size-resolved composition on CCN concentration and the variation of the importance with atmospheric aging of aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7267–7283, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7267-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7267-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, J. and Martin, S. T.: Satellite characterization of urban aerosols:
Importance of including hygroscopicity and mixing state in the retrieval
algorithms, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D17203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008078</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, S., Nan, J., Shi, C., Fu, Q., Gao, S., Wang, D., Cui, H., Saiz-Lopez, A., and
Zhou, B.:
Atmospheric ammonia and its impacts on regional air quality over the
megacity of Shanghai, China, Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 15842,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15842" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep15842</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y. and Chen, Y.: Significant Climate Impact of Highly Hygroscopic
Atmospheric Aerosols in Delhi, India, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 5535–5545,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL082339</ext-link>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, Z. J., Poulain, L., Henning, S., Dieckmann, K., Birmili, W., Merkel, M., van Pinxteren, D., Spindler, G., Müller, K., Stratmann, F., Herrmann, H., and Wiedensohler, A.: Relating particle hygroscopicity and CCN activity to chemical composition during the HCCT-2010 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7983–7996, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7983-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7983-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Worsnop, D. R., and Canagaratna, M.: A case
study of urban particle acidity and its influence on secondary organic
aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 3213–3219,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es061812j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es061812j</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Air mass physiochemical characteristics over New Delhi: impacts on aerosol hygroscopicity and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) formation</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Delhi is a megacity subject to high local anthropogenic emissions and
long-range transport of pollutants. This work presents for the first time
time-resolved estimates of hygroscopicity parameter (<i>κ</i>) and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), spanning for
more than a year, derived from chemical composition and size distribution
data. As a part of the Delhi Aerosol Supersite (DAS) campaign, the
characterization of aerosol composition and size distribution was conducted
from January 2017 to March 2018. Air masses originating from the Arabian Sea
(AS), Bay of Bengal (BB), and southern Asia  (SA) exhibited distinct
characteristics of time-resolved sub-micron non-refractory PM<sub>1</sub> (NRPM<sub>1</sub>) species, size distributions, and CCN number concentrations.
The SA air mass had the highest NRPM<sub>1</sub> loading with high chloride and
organics, followed by the BB air mass, which was more contaminated
than AS, with a higher organic fraction and nitrate. The primary sources
were identified as biomass-burning, thermal power plant emissions,
industrial emissions, and vehicular emissions. The average hygroscopicity parameter
(<i>κ</i>), calculated by the mixing rule, was approximately 0.3 (varying between
0.13 and 0.77) for all the air masses (0.32±0.06 for AS, 0.31±0.06 for BB, and 0.32±0.10 for SA). The diurnal variations in <i>κ</i> were
impacted by the chemical properties and thus source activities. The total,
Aitken, and accumulation mode number concentrations were higher for SA,
followed by BB and AS. The mean values of estimated CCN number concentration
(<i>N</i><sub>CCN</sub>; 3669–28926&thinsp;cm<sup>−3</sup>) and the activated fraction (<i>a</i><sub>f</sub>;
0.19–0.87), for supersaturations varying from 0.1&thinsp;% to 0.8&thinsp;%, also showed the
same trend, implying that these were highest in SA, followed by those in BB
and then those in AS. The size turned out to be more important than chemical
composition directly, and the <i>N</i><sub>CCN</sub> was governed by either the Aitken
or accumulation modes, depending upon the supersaturation (SS) and critical
diameter (<i>D</i><sub>c</sub>). <i>a</i><sub>f</sub> was governed mainly by the geometric mean
diameter (GMD), and such a high <i>a</i><sub>f</sub> (0.71±0.14 for the most
dominant sub-branch of the SA air mass – R1 – at 0.4&thinsp;% SS) has not been seen
anywhere in the world for a continental site. The high <i>a</i><sub>f</sub> was a
consequence of very low <i>D</i><sub>c</sub> (25–130&thinsp;nm, for SS ranging from
0.1&thinsp;% to 0.8&thinsp;%) observed for Delhi. Indirectly, the chemical properties
also impacted CCN and <i>a</i><sub>f</sub> by impacting the diurnal patterns of Aitken
and accumulation modes, <i>κ</i> and <i>D</i><sub>c</sub>. The high-hygroscopic nature of
aerosols, high <i>N</i><sub>CCN</sub>, and high <i>a</i><sub>f</sub> can severely impact the
precipitation patterns of the Indian monsoon in Delhi, impact the radiation budget,
and have indirect effects and need to be investigated to quantify this
impact.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation
interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active
aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Arub, Z., Bhandari, S., Gani, S., Apte, J. S., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., and  Habib, G.:
rawdata_arubetal2020.xlsx, available at: <a href="http://web.iitd.ac.in/~gazala/rawdata_arubetal2020.xlsx" target="_blank"/>, last access: 6 June 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Asa-Awuku, A., Moore, R. H., Nenes, A., Bahreini, R., Holloway, J. S.,
Brock, C. A., Middlebrook, A. M., Ryerson, T. B., Jimenez, J. L., Decarlo, P. F., Hecobian, A., Weber, R. J., Stickel, R., Tanner, D. J., and Huey, L. G.: Airborne cloud condensation nuclei
measurements during the 2006 Texas Air Quality Study, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 116, 1–18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014874" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014874</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., Troe, J., and IUPAC Subcommittee: Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume II – gas phase reactions of organic species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3625–4055, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bhandari, S., Gani, S., Patel, K., Wang, D. S., Soni, P., Arub, Z., Habib, G., Apte, J. S., and Hildebrandt Ruiz, L.: Sources and atmospheric dynamics of organic aerosol in New Delhi, India: insights from receptor modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 735–752, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-735-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-735-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattu, D. and Tripathi, S. N.: Inter-seasonal variability in
size-resolved CCN properties at Kanpur, India, Atmos. Environ., 85,
161–168, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.016</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattu, D. and Tripathi, S. N.: CCN closure study: Effects of aerosol
chemical composition and mixing state, J. Geophys Res.-Atmos., 120, 766–783, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021978" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021978</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bi, X., Zhang, G., Li, L., Wang, X., Li, M., Sheng, G., Fu, J., and Zhou, Z.:
Mixing state of biomass burning particles by single particle aerosol mass
spectrometer in the urban area of PRD, China, Atmos.
Environ., 45, 3447–3453,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.034</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P.,   Kerminen, V.-M.,  Kondo,  Y.,   Liao, H.,  Lohmann,  U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen,  S. K., Boschung,  J., Nauels,  A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bougiatioti, A., Fountoukis, C., Kalivitis, N., Pandis, S. N., Nenes, A., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Cloud condensation nuclei measurements in the marine boundary layer of the Eastern Mediterranean: CCN closure and droplet growth kinetics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7053–7066, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7053-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7053-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bougiatioti, A., Nenes, A., Fountoukis, C., Kalivitis, N., Pandis, S. N., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Size-resolved CCN distributions and activation kinetics of aged continental and marine aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8791–8808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8791-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8791-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Braga, R. C., Rosenfeld, D., Weigel, R., Jurkat, T., Andreae, M. O., Wendisch, M., Pöschl, U., Voigt, C., Mahnke, C., Borrmann, S., Albrecht, R. I., Molleker, S., Vila, D. A., Machado, L. A. T., and Grulich, L.: Further evidence for CCN aerosol concentrations determining the height of warm rain and ice initiation in convective clouds over the Amazon basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14433–14456, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14433-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14433-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Brock, C. A., Wagner, N. L., Anderson, B. E., Beyersdorf, A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Diskin, G. S., Gordon, T. D., Jimenez, J. L., Lack, D. A., Liao, J., Markovic, M. Z., Middlebrook, A. M., Perring, A. E., Richardson, M. S., Schwarz, J. P., Welti, A., Ziemba, L. D., and Murphy, D. M.: Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 2: Sensitivity of aerosol optical depth to relative humidity and aerosol parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5009–5019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5009-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5009-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chakraborty, A., Bhattu, D., Gupta, T., Tripathi, S. N., and Canagaratna,
M. R.: Real-time measurements of ambient aerosols in a polluted Indian city:
Sources, characteristics, and processing of organic aerosols during foggy
and nonfoggy periods, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
9006–9019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023419" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023419</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chakraborty, A., Gupta, T., and Tripathi, S. N.: Chemical composition and
characteristics of ambient aerosols and rainwater residues during Indian
summer monsoon: Insight from aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos.
Environ., 136, 144–155, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.024</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Wild, O., Wang, Y., Ran, L., Teich, M., Größ, J., Wang, L., Spindler, G., Herrmann, H., van Pinxteren, D., McFiggans, G., and Wiedensohler, A.: The influence of impactor size cut-off shift caused by
hygroscopic growth on particulate matter loading and composition
measurements, Atmos. Environ., 195, 141–148,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.049</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cheney, J. L., Conner, W. D., Bennett, R. L., Duke, D. L., and Walters, C.
L.: Formation of a detached plume from a cement plant, NTIS, Springfield,
VA, USA, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Derwent, R. G., Ryall, D. B., Jennings, S. G., Spain, T. G., and Simmonds,
P. G.: Black carbon aerosol and carbon monoxide in European regionally
polluted air masses at Mace Head, Ireland during 1995–1998, Atmos.
Environ., 35, 6371–6378,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00394-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00394-6</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G. D.: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle
Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) model access via NOAA ARL READY website,
NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD, 25, available at: <a href="http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php" target="_blank"/> (last access: 18 May 2020), 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Du, H. H., Kong, L. D., Cheng, T., Chen, J., Yang, X., Zhang, R., Han, Z., Yan, Z., and Ma, Y.: Insights into ammonium particle-to-gas conversion: non-sulfate
ammonium coupling with nitrate and chloride, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 10,
589–595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2010.04.0034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2010.04.0034</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Curtius, J., Drewnick, F., Schneider, J.,
Kürten, A., Rose, D., Andreae, M. O., Borrmann, S., and Pöschl, U.: Enhanced organic mass fraction and
decreased hygroscopicity of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) during new
particle formation events, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040930" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040930</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Engelhart, G. J., Hennigan, C. J., Miracolo, M. A., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity of fresh primary and aged biomass burning aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7285–7293, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Erickson, R. E., Yates, L. M., Clark, R. L., and McEwen, D.: The reaction
of sulfur dioxide with ozone in water and its possible atmospheric
significance, Atmos. Environ., 11, 813–817,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(77)90043-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(77)90043-9</a>, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Esri, Garmin International: World Countries (Generalized), available at:
<a href="https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=170b5e6529064b8d9275168687880359" target="_blank"/> (last access: 17 May 2020),
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Fuzzi, S., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Cavalli, F., Emblico, L., Mircea,
M., Andreae, M. O., Trebs, I., Hoffer, A., Guyon, P., Artaxo, P., Rizzo, L. V., Lara, L. L., Pauliquevis, T., Maenhaut, W., Raes, N., Chi, X., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Soto-García, L. L., Claeys, M., Kourtchev, I., Rissler, J., Swietlicki, E., Tagliavini, E., Schkolnik, G., Falkovich, A. H., Rudich, Y., Fisch, G., and Gatti, L. V.: Overview of the inorganic and organic composition
of size-segregated aerosol in Rondonia, Brazil, from the biomass-burning
period to the onset of the wet season, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006741" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006741</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gandhi, H. S. and Shelef, M.: Effects of sulphur on noble metal automotive
catalysts, Appl. Catal., 77, 175–186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-9834(91)80063-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-9834(91)80063-3</a>,
1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Gani, S., Bhandari, S., Seraj, S., Wang, D. S., Patel, K., Soni, P., Arub, Z., Habib, G., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., and Apte, J. S.: Submicron aerosol composition in the world's most polluted megacity: the Delhi Aerosol Supersite study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6843–6859, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6843-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6843-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Gaur, A., Tripathi, S. N., Kanawade, V. P., Tare, V., and Shukla, S. P.:
Four-year measurements of trace gases (SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, CO, and O<sub>3</sub>) at an urban
location, Kanpur, in Northern India, J. Atmos.
Chem., 71, 283–301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-014-9295-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-014-9295-8</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Guhathakurta, P., Rajeevan, M., Sikka, D. R., and Tyagi, A.: Observed
changes in southwest monsoon rainfall over India during 1901–2011,
Int. J. Climatol., 35, 1881–1898,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4095</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Gunn, R. and Phillips, B. B.: An experimental investigation of the effect
of air pollution on the initiation of rain, J. Meteorol., 14,
272–280, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1957)014&lt;0272:AEIOTE&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1957)014&lt;0272:AEIOTE&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1957.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Gunthe, S. S., King, S. M., Rose, D., Chen, Q., Roldin, P., Farmer, D. K., Jimenez, J. L., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., Martin, S. T., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in pristine tropical rainforest air of Amazonia: size-resolved measurements and modeling of atmospheric aerosol composition and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7551–7575, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7551-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7551-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Gunthe, S. S., Rose, D., Su, H., Garland, R. M., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Kuwata, M., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhu, T., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) from fresh and aged air pollution in the megacity region of Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11023–11039, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11023-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11023-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Habib, G., Venkataraman, C., Chiapello, I., Ramachandran, S., Boucher, O.,
and Reddy, M. S.: Seasonal and interannual variability in absorbing
aerosols over India derived from TOMS: Relationship to regional meteorology
and emissions, Atmos. Environ., 40, 1909–1921,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.077</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, R. M. and Pio, C. A.: Major ion composition and chemical
associations of inorganic atmospheric aerosols, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 17, 169–174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00109a009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es00109a009</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Haynes, W. M., Lide, D. R., and Bruno, T. J. (Eds.): CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 95th Edn., CRC press, Florida, USA, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ho, K. F., Lee, S. C., Guo, H., and Tsai, W. Y.: Seasonal and diurnal
variations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere of Hong
Kong, Sci. Total Environ., 322, 155–166,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.10.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.10.004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Hong, J., Häkkinen, S. A. K., Paramonov, M., Äijälä, M., Hakala, J., Nieminen, T., Mikkilä, J., Prisle, N. L., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Bilde, M., Kerminen, V.-M., and Petäjä, T.: Hygroscopicity, CCN and volatility properties of submicron atmospheric aerosol in a boreal forest environment during the summer of 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4733–4748, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4733-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4733-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Jaiprakash, Singhai, A., Habib, G., Raman, R. S., and Gupta, T.: Chemical
characterization of PM<sub>1.0</sub> aerosol in Delhi and source apportionment using
positive matrix factorization, Environ. Sci. Pollut.
R., 24, 445–462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7708-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7708-8</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kalapureddy, M. C. R., Kaskaoutis, D. G., Ernest Raj, P., Devara, P. C. S.,
Kambezidis, H. D., Kosmopoulos, P. G., and  Nastos, P. T.: Identification of
aerosol type over the Arabian Sea in the premonsoon season during the
Integrated Campaign for Aerosols, Gases and Radiation Budget
(ICARB), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D17203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011826" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011826</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kaneyasu, N., Yoshikado, H., Mizuno, T., Sakamoto, K., and Soufuku, M.:
Chemical forms and sources of extremely high nitrate and chloride in winter
aerosol pollution in the Kanto Plain of Japan, Atmos.
Environ., 33, 1745–1756,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00396-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00396-3</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lance, S., Raatikainen, T., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Yu, X.-Y., Alexander, M. L., Stolzenburg, M. R., McMurry, P. H., Smith, J. N., and Nenes, A.: Aerosol mixing state, hygroscopic growth and cloud activation efficiency during MIRAGE 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5049–5062, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5049-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5049-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, S. Y., Gan, C., and Chew, B. N.: Visibility deterioration and
hygroscopic growth of biomass burning aerosols over a tropical coastal city:
a case study over Singapore's airport, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 17,
624–629, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.712" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.712</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Leena, P. P., Pandithurai, G., Anilkumar, V., Murugavel, P., Sonbawne, S.
M., and Dani, K. K.: Seasonal variability in aerosol, CCN and their
relationship observed at a high altitude site in Western Ghats, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 128, 143–153,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-015-0406-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-015-0406-0</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Leng, C., Zhang, Q., Zhang, D., Xu, C., Cheng, T., Zhang, R., Tao, J., Chen, J., Zha, S., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Kong, L., and Gao, W.: Variations of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and aerosol activity during fog–haze episode: a case study from Shanghai, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12499–12512, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12499-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12499-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Cheng, Y., Hu, M., and Han, T.: Aerosol hygroscopicity
and its impact on atmospheric visibility and radiative forcing in Guangzhou
during the 2006 PRIDE-PRD campaign, Atmos. Environ., 60, 59–67,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.016</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Moorthy, K. K., Satheesh, S. K., Babu, S. S., and Dutt, C. B. S.:
Integrated campaign for aerosols, gases and radiation budget (ICARB): an
overview, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 117, 243–262,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0029-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0029-7</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Nair, V. S., Moorthy, K. K., Babu, S. S., Narasimhulu, K., Reddy, L. S. S., Reddy, R. R., Gopal, K. R., Sreekanth, V., Madhavan, B. L., and Niranjan, K.: Size segregated aerosol mass
concentration measurements over the Arabian Sea during ICARB, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 117, 315–323,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0034-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0034-x</a>, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Nair, V. S., Babu, S. S., and Moorthy, K. K.: Aerosol characteristics in
the marine atmospheric boundary layer over the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea
during ICARB: Spatial distribution and latitudinal and longitudinal
gradients, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D15208,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009823" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009823</a>, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Nault, B. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Schroder, J. C., Anderson, B., Beyersdorf, A. J., Blake, D. R., Brune, W. H., Choi, Y., Corr, C. A., de Gouw, J. A., Dibb, J., DiGangi, J. P., Diskin, G. S., Fried, A., Huey, L. G., Kim, M. J., Knote, C. J., Lamb, K. D., Lee, T., Park, T., Pusede, S. E., Scheuer, E., Thornhill, K. L., Woo, J.-H., and Jimenez, J. L.: Secondary organic aerosol production from local emissions dominates the organic aerosol budget over Seoul, South Korea, during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17769–17800, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17769-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17769-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009604003981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009604003981</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Ulbrich, I. M.,
and Worsnop, D. R.: Real-time methods for estimating organic component mass
concentrations from aerosol mass spectrometer data, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 45, 910–916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Padró, L. T., Moore, R. H., Zhang, X., Rastogi, N., Weber, R. J., and
Nenes, A.: Mixing state and compositional effects on CCN activity and
droplet growth kinetics of size-resolved CCN in an urban environment, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 10239–10255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10239-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10239-2012</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, Y., Tian, S., Liu, D., Fang, Y., Zhu, X., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B., Michalski, G., and Wang, Y.:
Fossil fuel combustion-related emissions dominate atmospheric ammonia
sources during severe haze episodes: Evidence from <sup>15</sup>N-stable isotope in
size-resolved aerosol ammonium, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 50, 8049–8056, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00634" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00634</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Petters, M. D., Carrico, C. M., Kreidenweis, S. M., Prenni, A. J., DeMott,
P. J., Collett Jr., J. L., and Moosmüller, H.: Cloud condensation
nucleation activity of biomass burning aerosol, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 114, D22205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Pöschl, U., Rose, D., and Andreae, M. O.: Climatologies of
Cloud-Related Aerosols – Part 2: Particle Hygroscopicity and Cloud
Condensation Nucleus Activity, in: Clouds in the Perturbed Climate System: Their
Relationship to Energy Balance, Atmospheric Dynamics, and Precipitation,
58–72, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Pringle, K. J., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Pöschl, U., and Lelieveld, J.: Global distribution of the effective aerosol hygroscopicity parameter for CCN activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5241–5255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5241-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5241-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Psichoudaki, M., Nenes, A., Florou, K., Kaltsonoudis, C., and Pandis, S.
N.: Hygroscopic properties of atmospheric particles emitted during
wintertime biomass burning episodes in Athens, Atmos. Environ., 178,
66–72, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.004</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Rajput, P., Mandaria, A.,
Kachawa, L., Singh, D. K., Singh, A. K., and Gupta, T.: Wintertime
source-apportionment of PM<sub>1</sub> from Kanpur in the Indo-Gangetic plain, Climatic
Change, 1, 503–507, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Ram, K., Tripathi, S. N., Sarin, M. M., and
Bhattu, D.: Primary and secondary aerosols from an urban site (Kanpur) in
the Indo-Gangetic Plain: impact on CCN, CN concentrations and optical
properties, Atmos. Environ., 89, 655–663,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.009</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Reddy, M. S. and Venkataraman, C.: Inventory of aerosol and sulphur
dioxide emissions from India: I – Fossil fuel combustion, Atmos.
Environ., 36, 677–697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00463-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00463-0</a>,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Rissler, J., Swietlicki, E., Zhou, J., Roberts, G., Andreae, M. O., Gatti, L. V., and Artaxo, P.: Physical properties of the sub-micrometer aerosol over the Amazon rain forest during the wet-to-dry season transition – comparison of modeled and measured CCN concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2119–2143, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2119-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2119-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Rose, D., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 1: Size-resolved measurements and implications for the modeling of aerosol particle hygroscopicity and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3365–3383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Su, H., Garland, R. M., Yang, H., Berghof, M., Cheng, Y. F., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Hu, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 2: Size-resolved aerosol chemical composition, diurnal cycles, and externally mixed weakly CCN-active soot particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2817–2836, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenfeld, D.: TRMM observed first direct evidence of smoke from forest
fires inhibiting rainfall, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3105–3108,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL006066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL006066</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenfeld, D.: Suppression of rain and snow by urban and industrial air
pollution, Science, 287, 1793–1796,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1793" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1793</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenfeld, D., Lahav, R., Khain, A., and Pinsky, M.: The role of sea spray
in cleansing air pollution over ocean via cloud processes,
Science, 297, 1667–1670, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073869" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073869</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenfeld, D., Lohmann, U., Raga, G. B., O'Dowd, C. D., Kulmala, M., Fuzzi,
S., Reissell, A., and Andreae, M. O.: Flood or drought: how do aerosols affect
precipitation?, Science, 321, 1309–1313, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160606" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160606</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Roy, A., Chatterjee, A., Sarkar, C., Das, S. K., Ghosh, S. K., and Raha,
S.: A study on aerosol-cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activation over
eastern Himalaya in India, Atmos. Res., 189, 69–81,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.01.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.01.015</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Rudich, Y., Khersonsky, O., and Rosenfeld, D.: Treating clouds with a grain
of salt, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2060,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016055</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Sandradewi, J., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Perron, N., Alfarra, M. R., Lanz, V. A., Weingartner,
E., and Baltensperger, U.: Using Aerosol Light Absorption Measurements for
the Quantitative Determination of Wood Burning and Traffic Emission Contributions to Particulate Matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 3316–3323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es702253m" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es702253m</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics of Air Pollution,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 20, 863–863,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00151a602" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es00151a602</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Sharma, S. K., Kumar, M., Gupta, N. C., Saxena, M., and Mandal, T. K.:
Characteristics of ambient ammonia over Delhi, India, Meteorol.
Atmos. Phys., 124, 67–82,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-013-0299-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-013-0299-8</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Squires, P.: The microstructure and colloidal stability of warm clouds: Part
II – The causes of the variations in microstructure, Tellus, 10, 262–271,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1958.tb02012.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1958.tb02012.x</a>, 1958.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Stelson, A. W. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Relative humidity and pH dependence of
the vapor pressure of ammonium nitrate-nitric acid solutions at 25&thinsp;°C, Atmos. Environ., 16, 993–1000,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90185-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90185-8</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Sullivan, R. C., Moore, M. J. K., Petters, M. D., Kreidenweis, S. M., Roberts, G. C., and Prather, K. A.: Effect of chemical mixing state on the hygroscopicity and cloud nucleation properties of calcium mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3303–3316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3303-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3303-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, W. K., Chen, J. P., Li, Z., Wang, C., and Zhang, C.: Impact of
aerosols on convective clouds and precipitation, Rev.
Geophys., 50, RG2001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000369" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000369</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Tiwari, S., Dahiya, A., and Kumar, N.: Investigation into relationships
among NO, NO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, and CO at an urban background site in Delhi, India,
Atmos. Res., 157, 119–126,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.01.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.01.008</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Turšič, J., Podkrajšek, B., Grgić, I., Ctyroky, P., Berner,
A., Dusek, U., and Hitzenberger, R.: Chemical composition and hygroscopic
properties of size-segregated aerosol particles collected at the Adriatic
coast of Slovenia, Chemosphere, 63, 1193–1202,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.08.040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.08.040</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Cubison, M. J., Aiken, A. C., Jimenez, J. L., and Collins, D. R.: The importance of aerosol mixing state and size-resolved composition on CCN concentration and the variation of the importance with atmospheric aging of aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7267–7283, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7267-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7267-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J. and Martin, S. T.: Satellite characterization of urban aerosols:
Importance of including hygroscopicity and mixing state in the retrieval
algorithms, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D17203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008078" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008078</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, S., Nan, J., Shi, C., Fu, Q., Gao, S., Wang, D., Cui, H., Saiz-Lopez, A., and
Zhou, B.:
Atmospheric ammonia and its impacts on regional air quality over the
megacity of Shanghai, China, Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 15842,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15842" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15842</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y. and Chen, Y.: Significant Climate Impact of Highly Hygroscopic
Atmospheric Aerosols in Delhi, India, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 5535–5545,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082339</a>, 2019.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Z. J., Poulain, L., Henning, S., Dieckmann, K., Birmili, W., Merkel, M., van Pinxteren, D., Spindler, G., Müller, K., Stratmann, F., Herrmann, H., and Wiedensohler, A.: Relating particle hygroscopicity and CCN activity to chemical composition during the HCCT-2010 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7983–7996, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7983-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7983-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Worsnop, D. R., and Canagaratna, M.: A case
study of urban particle acidity and its influence on secondary organic
aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 3213–3219,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es061812j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es061812j</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
