Future trends in air pollution and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for China are of great concern to the community. A set of global scenarios regarding future socio-economic and climate developments, combining shared socio-economic pathways (SSPs) with climate forcing outcomes as described by the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), was created by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Chinese researchers have also developed various emission scenarios by considering detailed local environmental and climate policies. However, a comprehensive scenario set connecting SSP–RCP scenarios with local policies and representing dynamic emission changes under local policies is still missing.
In this work, to fill this gap, we developed a dynamic projection model, the Dynamic Projection model for Emissions in China (DPEC), to explore China's future anthropogenic emission pathways. The DPEC is designed to integrate the energy system model, emission inventory model, dynamic projection model, and parameterized scheme of Chinese policies. The model contains two main modules, an energy-model-driven activity rate projection module and a sector-based emission projection module. The activity rate projection module provides the standardized and unified future energy scenarios after reorganizing and refining the outputs from the energy system model. Here we use a new China-focused version of the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM-China) to project future energy demand and supply in China under different SSP–RCP scenarios at the provincial level. The emission projection module links a bottom-up emission inventory model, the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC), to GCAM-China and accurately tracks the evolution of future combustion and production technologies and control measures under different environmental policies. We developed technology-based turnover models for several key emitting sectors (e.g. coal-fired power plants, key industries, and on-road transportation sectors), which can simulate the dynamic changes in the unit/vehicle fleet turnover process by tracking the lifespan of each unit/vehicle on an annual basis.
With the integrated modelling framework, we connected five SSP scenarios
(SSP1–5), five RCP scenarios (RCP8.5, 7.0, 6.0, 4.5, and 2.6), and three
pollution control scenarios (business as usual, BAU; enhanced control
policy, ECP; and best health effect, BHE) to produce six combined emission
scenarios. With those scenarios, we presented a wide range of China's future
emissions to 2050 under different development and policy pathways. We found
that, with a combination of strong low-carbon policy and air pollution
control policy (i.e. SSP1-26-BHE scenario), emissions of major air
pollutants (i.e.
The rapid development of China has led to severe air pollution due to the
ever-increasing energy demand and lax environmental legislation over the
past decades, and this exerts negative influences on human health, climate,
agriculture, and ecosystems (Liu et al., 2019; Xue et al., 2019a; Zheng et
al., 2019). In 2013, China implemented the Air Pollution Prevention and
Control Action Plan (denoted the Action Plan) to fight against air
pollution (China State Council, 2013), and a series of active clean air
policies for various sectors were adopted in support of the Action Plan.
Consequently, the emissions of major air pollutants have decreased, and the
air quality has substantially improved since 2013 (Zheng et al., 2018; Cheng
et al., 2019; Geng et al., 2017, 2019; Xue et al., 2019b; Zhang et al.,
2019a). The national annual mean PM
Future changes in energy and emissions in China are either projected separately or incorporated into Asia within global scenarios (Cofala et al., 2007; O'Neill et al., 2010; Amann et al., 2013; Rao et al., 2017; Gidden et al., 2019). Global scenarios, such as the new generation of global scenarios combining shared socio-economic pathways (SSPs) with climate forcing outcomes as described by the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), can reflect plausible future emissions based on socio-economic, environmental, and technological trends at the regional scale (Rao et al., 2017). However, there are several challenges in using these global scenarios in China's case. First, due to the incomplete knowledge of China's local policies, current global scenarios lack detailed descriptions of national and local energy and pollution control policies. Second, by employing simple extrapolation to emission factors, future estimates from the global scenarios could not provide the complete evolution of future combustion–production technologies and emission control measures. Third, recent emissions in China have changed dramatically as a consequence of clean air actions (Zheng et al., 2018), while historical emission data used in the global scenarios cannot easily capture the fast changes in emissions during recent years or over the next several years in China (Hoesly et al., 2018).
Previous studies have investigated future emission trends in China by
considering detailed local policies (Wei et al., 2011; Xing et al., 2011;
Zhao et al., 2013; Shi et al., 2016; Jiang et al., 2018; N. Li et al., 2019).
These scenarios describe future emission changes based on a set of
assumptions that reflect China's economic growth, energy demand, up-to-date
air quality, and climate mitigation policies. However, most of these local
scenarios are disconnected from global scenarios (e.g. SSP–RCP scenarios;
Rao et al., 2017), and only a few scenarios are comparable with IPCC
scenario sets (Jiang et al., 2018). Usually, these local scenarios neglect
the linkage between Chinese and global development pathways, and air
pollutant and
Framework of the Dynamic Projection model for Emissions in China (DPEC).
In this work, with the motivation to build a comprehensive scenario set that connects global scenarios with local policies and represents dynamic emission changes under local policies, we developed a dynamic projection model for China's future anthropogenic emissions, named the Dynamic Projection model for Emissions in China (DPEC). The DPEC is designed to track the dynamic changes in emissions, future combustion–production technologies, and emission control measures. This model includes an energy-model-driven activity rate projection module and a sector-based emission projection module, which integrates the energy system model, emission inventory model, dynamic projection model, and parameterized scheme of Chinese policies. Based on the DPEC, we created six emission scenarios by connecting five SSP scenarios (SSP1–5), five RCP scenarios (RCP8.5, 7.0, 6.0, 4.5, and 2.6), and three pollution control scenarios (business as usual, BAU; enhanced control policy, ECP; and best health effect, BHE) to explore future emission pathways during 2015–2050. Finally, we compared our estimates with similar scenarios from the harmonized Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) emissions dataset (Gidden et al., 2019). In this work, the purposes of developing the DPEC and creating a new set of Chinese scenarios are as follows: (1) connect with the IPCC scenario assembly, (2) synthetically consider region-specific and sector-based local policies, (3) develop technology-based turnover models for key emitting sectors to simulate the dynamic changes in future technologies, and (4) provide a set of emission projection datasets to the community. The development of this dynamic model and associated scenarios aims to identify win-win measures and pathways to support the future's short- and long-term synergizing actions on the environment and climate for policymakers.
As shown in Fig. 1, the DPEC includes two main modules, an energy-model-driven activity rate projection module and a sector-based emission projection module. The model integrates the energy system model, bottom-up emission inventory model, dynamic projection model, and parameterized scheme of environmental standards and policies.
The energy-model-driven activity rate projection module is set up to produce
standardized and unified future activity rates by linking the energy system
model with the emission inventory model. The DPEC is developed
starting with the bottom-up framework of the Multi-resolution Emission
Inventory for China (MEIC) model (available at
The sector-based emission projection module is built to dynamically track the evolution of future combustion–production technologies and control measures by parameterizing different environmental regulations and policies. Emission sectors included in this projection model are identical to those in the MEIC model. Here emission sources from the MEIC model are commonly classified into six sectors: power, industry, residential, transportation, solvent use, and agriculture (Sect. 2.3).
Future emissions from each emission source in each province are estimated as
follows:
Future energy demand and supply is usually provided by integrated energy
system models. Several energy system models, such as GCAM (Clarke et al.,
2008, 2018; Collins et al., 2015;
GCAM is a global partial equilibrium model with 32 energy–economy regions
representing the behaviour and interactions among five systems: the energy
system, water, agriculture and land use, economy, and climate. GCAM is
stewarded by the Joint Global Change Research Institute (JGCRI) (GCAM, 2019,
To better illustrate the emission characteristics, emission models, such as the MEIC model, always have much more elaborate emission sources and fuel type categories than energy models. Here, we downscaled and disaggregated the GCAM-China outputs and matched them to the MEIC framework (Table S1). The 227 fundamental emission categories in the MEIC model are composed of intercombinations of seven major sectors (including power, heating, industry, residential, transportation, solvent use, and agriculture) and various fuels and productions (Table S1). Different technologies would further divide these emissions into 745 detailed sources; however, the evolution of technology distributions is simulated in the DPEC. Therefore, the interaction data system mainly conducts sector mapping and fuel mapping to match the GCAM-China outputs to the 227 MEIC categories. Except for the heating sector, all the linkage works were operated at the provincial level.
From the sector perspective, the energy and economic-related outputs from the GCAM-China or GCAM model can be divided into four parts: resource production (primary energy), energy transformation (electricity, heat, refining, and other energy transformation), final energy use (buildings, industry, and transportation), and socio-economics (population and gross domestic product, GDP). The power and heating sector in DPEC were linked from the energy transformation part in GCAM-China. The power sectors of the two models have basically no gaps and can be directly matched. Due to the unavailability of provincial energy information in the heating sector in GCAM-China, we first matched the national heat outputs from the GCAM-China energy consumption sector to DPEC and then downscaled to the provincial level with district heat outputs. When downscaling, the heating industrial (to offer thermal energy) in the DPEC is derived from industry district heat in the industry sector, and residential heating (refers to centralized heating) in the DPEC is obtained from the commercial and residential urban district heat in the building sector. The residential, industry combustion, and transportation sectors in DPEC are matched with the final energy-use parts in GCAM-China, which are building, industry, and transportation. Similar to the power sector, the cement industry and transportation sources could also be seamlessly connected in the two models. Residential in DPEC is taken from the building sector, including cooking and heating. Boilers and kilns are two major industrial combustion sources in DPEC. Activity rates of industrial boilers and cement kilns in DPEC are provided by industry final energy use and cement energy consumption in GCAM-China, respectively. For other industrial kilns (brick and lime), the activity rates are estimated by their base-year data and the future cement energy-use curve. Future iron and steel manufacturing would be simultaneously affected by energy transformation and socio-economic development. Due to the lack of iron and steel projections in GCAM-China (version 4.3), we estimated future iron and steel productions with projected GDP using the elastic coefficient method (Cao et al., 2016) and fixed furnace fractions (electric, coal-fired, gas-fired, and other-fuel-fired) of newly built capacities to maintain the same energy structure as that of the whole industry sector. The activity rates of non-energy-related sectors in the DPEC, including industrial processes, solvent use, and agriculture, were mostly driven by socio-economic outputs from GCAM-China, which were specifically described in Sect. 2.3.
In terms of fuel mapping, the fuel types in GCAM-China include coal, liquids, gas, biomass, solar resources, nuclear, wind resources, geothermal, and hydro-energy, while the MEIC model partitions each fossil fuel or biofuel in a more detailed manner (Table S1). A fuel type ratio database is established based on each specific fuel structure of coal, liquids, gas, and biomass in the MEIC model, and the energy outputs of GCAM-China are then distributed by this base-year proportion to show the detailed fuel use in DPEC. The standard coal equivalent is adopted with the different units of different fuel types. This reaggregation process of fuel types indicates that the absolute amount and relative proportion of coal, liquids, gas and biomass will evolve under the driver of the energy model, while the substructure inside each major fuel type will remain the same as the 2015 levels in MEIC.
Eliminating discrepancies in the base year between MEIC and GCAM-China models is pivotal to project future emissions, which can maintain the consistency with energy outputs to the best extent. In this study, 2015 is chosen as the base year, the historical energy and activity rates in 2015 used in MEIC are obtained from China Energy Statistical Yearbook (National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), 2016), and the 2015 information in the GCAM-China model is projected, as GCAM is calibrated in 2010 using the historical datasets from the International Energy Agency (IEA, 2011). The deviation ranges of major fuel types in the base year vary from 6 % to 13 %, and these discrepancies are mainly caused by different statistical methods and raw data sources (Hong et al., 2017). These balances should also evolve with the projected future trends instead of remaining unchanged. Thus, we harmonized the GCAM-China energy outputs (which have first been reorganized and downscaled to DPEC fuel type categories) by multiplying the base-year balance ratio (MEIC base-year energy values divided by GCAM-China base-year energy values), rather than add or subtract these balances.
Emission projection module is developed for various sectors based on the historical combustion and production technology and emission control information obtained from the MEIC. Given both emission contributions and data availability, the technology-based turnover models built for several key emitting sources (e.g. coal-fired power plants, key industries, and on-road transportation) are used to simulate the dynamic changes in the unit/vehicle fleet turnover process by tracking the lifespan of each unit/vehicle on an annual basis. In addition, technology-based models developed for the remaining emission sources (i.e. other-fuel-fired power plants, other industries, off-road transportation, solvent use, residential, and agriculture sectors) are to directly forecast the effects of different technologies and control measures (Table S2). To develop sector-based projection models with different emission characteristics, we grouped the power and heating sectors into energy supply and divided the industry sector into the industrial combustion and industrial non-combustion sectors.
Considering the coal-dominated structure in the power sector and a unit-based power plant database during 1990–2015 developed in the MEIC (Liu et al., 2015; Tong et al., 2018a, b), a unit-based emission projection model for coal-fired power plants was developed in our previous study to assess the evolution of the coal-fired power unit fleet and associated emissions (Tong et al., 2018a). This model was designed to simulate power plant fleet turnover by tracking the lifespan of each power generation unit, which can be used in various future policy analyses and emission estimates for coal-fired power plants. In this work, the total coal power generation and coal consumption are directly obtained from GCAM-China (Table S1). We integrated this already-built projection model into the DPEC to project future emissions from coal-fired power plants over China through the year 2050.
Other fuel types combusted in China's power plants mainly include natural gas and biomass, and their future energy consumption is obtained from GCAM-China (Table S1). A technology-based emission projection model is developed for other-fuel-fired power plants due to limited historical emission information. The emission factors are estimated by projecting the effects of different combustion technologies and end-of-pipe control technologies in the target years (i.e. 2020, 2030, and 2050) according to the environmental policies (Xing et al., 2011; Tian et al., 2013), and the effects in the other years of the future are obtained through linear interpolation.
District heating is usually supplied by conventional heat plants or combined heat and power (CHP) plants (Rezaie et al., 2012) for industrial and residential purposes. CHP systems are more thermally efficient than producing process heat alone (Lasseter et al., 2004). Therefore, the government promotes the use of CHP plants. In this work, energy consumption in heat plants by fuel type is obtained from GCAM-China (Table S1), and we developed a power technology-based model to project the technology evolution of heat plants. First, we split energy consumption for CHP plants and conventional heat plants according their thermal efficiencies and heat supply policies. Then, we assumed that CHP plants share the same combustion technology and control technology distributions as power plants under corresponding emission scenarios. For conventional heat plants, we simply adopted a similar model that was developed for other-fuel-fired power plants.
The coal used in the industry sector is commonly combusted in coal-fired boilers or kilns (i.e. cement, lime, and brick kilns). Coal consumption in boilers is estimated as total industrial coal consumption from GCAM-China minus estimated coal consumption in kilns (Table S1). Future cement coal consumption is obtained directly from GCAM-China. By assuming a simultaneous demand change among these industries of non-metal building materials and similar improvement in energy efficiencies (i.e. energy consumed per unit product), the projections of coal consumption in lime and brick kilns are therefore based on the future trends in cement coal use (Table S1). Thus, the coal consumed in industrial boilers is derived.
A technology-based turnover emission projection model for coal-fired
industrial boilers is developed (Fig. S1). The historical information of
coal-fired industrial boilers is obtained from the MEE (unpublished data,
hereafter referred to as the MEE-boiler database), which includes unit-level
boiler capacity, combustion technology, and end-of-pipe control devices.
Given that the MEE-boiler database is incomplete, instead of developing a
boiler-based emission projection model, we aggregated all industrial boilers
into 16 categories based on boiler size (
Emissions from cement, lime, and brick kilns and other associated industrial processes are estimated within the same projection model and are detailed in the industrial non-combustion sector (Sect. 2.3.3).
The energy consumption by other fuel combustion is directly obtained from GCAM-China (Table S1). The changes in emission factors are estimated by projecting the effects of different combustion technologies and end-of-pipe control measures in the target years (i.e. 2020, 2030, and 2050) according to the environmental policies (Xing et al., 2011), and then these changes are linearly interpolated to the other years in the future.
As the world's largest steel production area, China is reported to contribute almost half of global raw steel production (USGS, 2016). The iron and steel industry involves a series of closely linked processing steps, including preparation of raw materials, iron-making, steel-making, and finishing processes (Wang et al., 2016). First, the productions of sinter, iron, and steel were driven by GDP with a resilience factor law, similar to the cement projections in GCAM-China (Table S3). For the coke industry, most of the coke is used in the iron-making process; therefore, we projected the coke production based on the change trend in iron production (Table S3). The climate and energy policies would change the capacity structures and electric furnace proportions of these subsectors.
Here, a technology-based turnover model for the iron and steel industry is
built. Emissions from each process (sinter, iron, and steel) are
independently projected in the model (Fig. S1). The historical unit-based
information of each process is also obtained from MEE (unpublished data,
hereafter referred to as the MEE-steel database), which includes the
unit-based and process-based operational status (when the unit was
commissioned and decommissioned), capacity, production, technology type, control
devices, and corresponding removal efficiencies. We first aggregated the
facilities of each process (sinter, iron, and steel productions) into 32
categories based on years under operation (
China is the world's largest cement producer and consumer (Lei et al., 2011b). To project future emissions from the cement industry, a kiln-based turnover model is built, which is similar to the model built for coal-fired power plants (Tong et al., 2018a). We began with a kiln-based emission inventory for the 1990–2015 period, which provides historical clinker kiln-level technology and emission information including capacity, operating year, production technology, annual production of clinker and cement, and end-of-pipe control devices and corresponding removal efficiencies (Lei et al., 2011b).
A schematic of the model for the cement industry is shown in Fig. S2. The total cement demand is obtained directly from GCAM-China (Table S1). Beginning with the estimated clinker capacity demand, we simulate the year-to-year dynamics of clinker production structure turnover by considering the retirement of outdated kilns (e.g. small, old, or inefficient capacity) and construction of new kilns. The retirement rate of old kilns is driven by the future demand and forced elimination policy of outdated production capacity. A function for ordering the retirement of individual kilns is developed at the provincial level by considering the production technology, age, and designed capacity with descending priority, which is similar to the function created for coal-fired power plants (Tong et al., 2018a). After considering the retired kilns, for a given year, the model then estimates the capacity gap after evaluating the clinker production capacity of in-fleet kilns and fills the gap using newly built kilns. We finally model the changes in kiln-based emission factors by considering the evolution of the end-of-pipe control technologies. To determine the order of end-of-pipe technology upgrades for each individual kiln, we set up an evolution function of end-of-pipe technology at the provincial level by considering the production technology, designed capacity, and age of each kiln (Tong et al., 2018a).
Except for coke, iron, and steel plants, as well as cement plants, the emission sources of all other metal products, nonferrous metals, non-metal building materials, and other industrial products from the MEIC are grouped into “other metals and non-metals”. Specifically, other metal products and nonferrous metals include foundry products, aluminium, copper, zinc, alumina, and other nonferrous metals. Non-metal building materials include glass (flat glass and glass products), lime, and brick. Other industrial products mainly include products from the food and drink industry (i.e. bread, cake, biscuits, sugar, beer, wine, and spirits) and the textile industry (i.e. wool, silk, cloth, and synthetic fibres).
The future productions of the above-mentioned industrial products are projected in different ways due to unavailability from the GCAM-China model. The productions of other metal products and nonferrous metals are projected by building the regression models, which are used to describe the relationships among steel production (or GDP) and production of each product based on relevant statistical data from 1990 to 2015 (Table S3). For non-metal building materials, the future productions of flat glass and glass products are estimated based on the annual growth rate of the new building area (Table S3). Lime and brick productions are forecasted by applying the future trends in cement production (Table S1), which are consistent with their coal use projections. To project the productions of the food and drink industry and textile industry products, we built a series of regression models linking per capita GDP with their historical productions (Table S3).
Then, we estimated the changes in emission factors for each production process. In addition to production processes in the food and drink industry and textile industry, we assumed outdated production technologies in other metal industry and non-metal building material industry have similar retirement rates as those from the iron and steel industry and cement industry, respectively. The evolution of different control measures is estimated according to emission standards. For products from the food and drink industry and textile industry, only volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions are considered to be emitted. Because there is no specific production technology provided by the MEIC, we only considered the future evolution of VOC control measures. Here, we simply projected the effects of advanced devices designed to reduce VOCs in the targeted years (i.e. 2020, 2030, and 2050) according to the assumed environmental regulations.
The petrochemical industry is considered to be the key VOC-related industry, and VOC emissions from 34 types of petrochemical products are estimated in the MEIC inventory. Here, we grouped these products into five subsectors: oil and gas production, distribution, and refining; fertilizer production; solvent production; synthetic materials; and other chemical products.
Specifically, oil and gas production, distribution, and refining include crude oil production, crude oil handling, oil refining, natural gas production, natural gas distribution, oil depots (gasoline and diesel), and oil stations (gasoline and diesel). The activity rates of these industrial processes are projected based on the change rates of energy demands for corresponding fuel types obtained from GCAM-China (Table S1). Fertilizer production includes the production of urea, ammonium bicarbonate, other nitrate fertilizers (i.e. sodium nitrate and calcium nitrate), and NPK (i.e. nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) fertilizer. Fertilizers are commonly used in the agriculture sector, and production is determined by fertilizer demand of national crop yield. Therefore, we assumed that the change in fertilizer production is consistent with fertilizer consumption, which is estimated in the agriculture sector (Sect. 2.3.7). Similarly, solvent production is also determined by the market demand, which includes varnish paint, architectural paint, printing ink, and glue production. We projected the production based on the change rates in corresponding solvent use (Sect. 2.3.6).
Synthetic materials mainly include polyvinyl chloride (PVC) products, polystyrene, ethylene, low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), styrene, polystyrene, vinyl chloride, PVC, propylene, and polypropylene. Each synthetic material is projected by developing the regression models, and they are used to describe the relationship between national GDP and national production based on historical statistical data (Table S3). Other chemical products, including carbon black, sulfuric acid, synthetic ammonia by coal, pulp, asphalt production, rubber, and tires, are projected using either the change trends in other related products or the regression models linked to GDP (Zhang et al., 2018; Table S3).
For the above-mentioned products, we assumed that the emission factors are only affected by the end-of-pipe control measures due to no specific production technology provided by the MEIC, which is driven by the related environmental policies and emission standards.
Total energy consumed by fuel type in rural and urban areas in the residential sector is separately provided by the GCAM-China building sector (Table S1). The residential sector includes two distinct types of coal combustion equipment for different uses (boilers for heating and stoves for cooking and heating), and their emission factors are quite different (Zhang et al., 2007; Peng et al., 2019). The final residential energy-use split for each usage (i.e. residential heating, cooking, and hot water) is provided directly by GCAM-China (Table S1), which is driven by population, building area, and energy service intensity. The split ratio of two combustion technologies (boiler or stove) is exogenous and evolves with specific clean air policies.
A technology-based projection model for the residential sector is developed (Fig. S3). We projected the year-to-year dynamics of coal combustion technologies (boiler or stove) by assuming that coal stoves are used in individual houses for decentralized heating, cooking, and hot water supply, while coal-fired boilers are used for heating in large buildings in urban areas (Zhang et al., 2007). Finally, we projected the effects of clean coal use, advanced coal stoves and boilers, and end-of-pipe control technologies for coal-fired boilers in the target years (i.e. 2020, 2030, and 2050) under different environmental regulation assumptions and then estimated the effects in the other years of the future through linear interpolation.
For fuel types other than coal, due to limited historical information obtained from MEIC, the effects of advanced combustion technologies and control measures are estimated according to their promotion rates based on the assumed environmental policies.
There are nine vehicle types contained in the MEIC, including four types of passenger vehicles (heavy-duty buses, HDBs; medium-duty buses, MDBs; light-duty buses, LDBs; and minibuses, MBs) and four types of trucks (heavy-duty trucks, HDTs; medium-duty trucks, MDTs; light-duty trucks, LDTs; and mini-trucks, MTs) as well as motorcycles (MCs). Additionally, passenger vehicles and trucks are further subdivided based on four fuel types, including gasoline, diesel, natural gas, and electricity. The provincial-level on-road transportation energy consumption by fuel type is obtained directly from GCAM-China (Table S1).
A vehicle fleet turnover model is developed at the provincial level to simulate future energy consumption and emissions for each vehicle type by tracking the lifespan of each vehicle. As shown in Fig. S4, the model is built to include the vehicle fleet turnover simulation and the evolution of emission factors. For a given year, the model first estimates newly registered vehicles using a back-calculation method based on total on-road energy consumption and historical vehicle registration data (Zheng et al., 2015). Then, the model estimates the number of vehicles that survive (called “in-fleet vehicles”) using historical and estimated vehicle registration data. Therefore, we derived the future's vehicle fleet and corresponding energy consumption for each vehicle type. Finally, we modelled the changes in emission factors of in-fleet vehicles, which are estimated by the product of the base emission factors and deterioration correction factor (Zheng et al., 2014). Unabated emission factors of in-fleet vehicles are determined by their registration year and the implementation year of vehicle emission standards (Fig. S5). To avoid double counting in the emission estimation, our model estimated tank-to-well emissions, which means that vehicles using electricity have zero emissions in on-road transportation (Huo et al., 2015).
Off-road transportation includes agriculture machinery, construction machinery, low-speed trucks, three-wheelers, locomotives, and inland waterways in the MEIC inventory. Because the total energy consumption for off-road transportation in GCAM-China is blended in the industrial sector, we estimated these values exogenously and subtracted them from the GCAM-China industry energy outputs. We assumed that the proportions of on-road and off-road total energy consumptions in the future are the same as the average historical rates during 2010–2015 (the historical rates varied from 0.192 to 0.203, and we used an average rate of 0.198). On the other hand, the electrification ratio of off-road energy was assumed to be similar to that of the on-road sector. Finally, the total energy consumption and structure for off-road transportation are estimated using the historical on-road and off-road split rate, the projected on-road energy consumption, and structures.
At the provincial level, future energy consumption of each off-road type is first estimated based on the annual average growth rate during 2010–2015. Under the constraint of total off-road energy consumption, in a given year, we distributed total energy consumption to each off-road type according their energy consumption shares (Table S1). The changes in emission factors are evaluated according to the reduction proportions caused by the upgrade in emission standards (Fig. S5). Here, we assumed that the proportion reduction in emission factors between adjacent emission standards in the future is the same as the mean proportion reduction estimated with the published emission standards.
Solvent use is identified as one of the major VOC emission sources, which refers to the applications of products containing solvents. Solvents include paints, adhesives, inks, textile coating, pesticides, industrial and domestic cleaning agents, and so on (Wei et al., 2014). In this work, 17 emission sources from solvent use in the MEIC model are further classified into paint use, printing use, pharmaceutical production, vehicle treatment, wood production, pesticide use, and household solvent use.
Paint use includes the paint applied to architecture, vehicles, wood, and other industrial infrastructure (Li et al., 2014, M. Li et al., 2019). The activity rates of different types of paint use are projected by building various regression models (Klimont et al., 2002; Wei et al., 2011). Specifically, architecture interior wall coating and other architecture paint use, as well as paint use for decorative wood and wood furniture, are projected based on the annual growth rate of newly built areas (Table S3). The amount of new car varnish paint and vehicle refurnish paint use is forecasted by developing the regression model linked with the newly registered vehicles and total vehicles, respectively (Table S3). The activity rates of other industry paint use are projected according to the annual growth rate of the above paint use (Table S3).
For solvent use other than paint, printing use (including printing ink and
printing cleaning-gasoline solvent) and solvent use for wood production and
pharmaceutical production are also forecasted by developing the regression
models, and they are used to describe the relationship between national GDP
and national amounts based on relevant statistical data from 1990 to 2015
(Table S3). Similar to vehicle paint use, the regression model of passenger
vehicle treatment (for dewax or reseal) is also linked with newly registered
vehicles (Table S3). Household solvent use here includes domestic solvent,
dry clean
Then, the changes in emission factors for various types of solvent use are estimated through the substitution rates of environmentally friendly products (including low-VOC and zero-VOC products) and the effective rates of recovery technologies (e.g. carbon adsorption, incineration, and membrane vapour separations) (Belaissaoui et al., 2016) according to the assumed emission standards and environmental policies.
The agricultural sector is distinguished as the main emission source for
Similar to the classification of fertilizer production, the regression model is developed to forecast the total fertilizer application, which is used to describe the relationship between national crop yield and total consumption of fertilizer (Table S3). The future national crop yield is estimated using the product of per capita crop yield and population (Ray et al., 2013). Then, four types of fertilizer use are estimated through multiplying the total fertilizer use by their shares in 2015 (Table S3). The changes in emission factors are modelled by evaluating the different promotion levels of slow-release fertilizer application.
The designed scenario ensembles. Three-dimensional constraints, the socio-economic assumptions from the SSPs (SSP1, SSP2, SSP3, SSP4, and SSP5), the climate targets of the RCPs (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, RCP7.0, and RCP8.5), and the air pollution control ambitions (strong, medium, and weak) from the harmonized CMIP6 emissions dataset were integrated to constitute six China's localized CMIP6 emission scenarios. Each cell in the matrix indicates the feasible scenarios. The nine coloured cells represent the nine scenarios used in the ScenarioMIP experiment ensemble, and labelled cells represent the scenarios we created in this work. This figure is adapted and revised from O'Neill et al. (2016).
In this work, five SSP scenarios (SSP1–5; O'Neill et al., 2014) and five RCP
scenarios (RCP8.5, 7.0, 6.0, 4.5, and 2.6) are first connected to produce
five economic-energy scenarios, namely, SSP1-26, SSP2-45, SSP3-70, SSP4-60,
and SSP5-85. The SSPs were developed over the last several years to describe
global developments leading to different challenges for mitigation and
adaptation to climate change (O'Neill et al., 2014). And the RCPs were
defined by their total radiative forcing (cumulative measure of human GHG
emissions from all sources expressed in watts per square metre, W m
Then, we designed three pollution control scenarios toward medium-term and
long-term environmental goals proposed by the government. The first scenario
(BAU) is designed to explore the continuous effects of the Action Plan and
existing emission standards (before 2015); the second scenario (ECP) is
designed to basically attain the grand goal of building a “beautiful China”
by 2035 (the State Council of the People's Republic of China, 2019), which
requires fundamental improvement in the quality of the environment by
achieving its national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS, 35
The BAU scenario assumes that all current environmental legislations and policies released before 2015 would be implemented without any additional environmental policy until 2050. The ECP scenario further considered the emission control policies promulgated, proposed, or likely to be proposed before 2030. Two key control zones are extracted from China to simulate the evolution of pollution controls based on comprehensive consideration of the promulgated policies, geographical locations, and present air pollution conditions. One zone is the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) and surrounding areas and the Fenwei Plain, and the other is the Yangtze River Delta (YRD). Based on the ECP scenario, the BHE scenario further assumes that the best-available technologies will be phased in and fully applied during 2030–2050 in various sectors (see Sect. 3.3).
Following the interpretation of SSP narratives, a set of assumptions on pollution control is also developed in the CMIP6 database, including a weak pollution control scenario for SSP3 and SSP4, medium one for SSP2, and strong one for SSP1 and SSP5 (Fig. 2, Rao et al., 2017). In our work, the BAU, ECP, and BHE scenarios represent low, central, and high pollution control ambitions, respectively. Following the CMIP6 database framework, we therefore created five air pollution emission scenarios using the five economic-energy scenarios described above, namely SSP1-26-BHE, SSP2-45-ECP, SSP3-70-BAU, SSP4-60-BAU, and SSP5-85-BHE (marked in Fig. 2). Additionally, to explore the benefits of air pollutant emission reductions from mid- and long-term energy transitions, the SSP1-26-ECP scenario is supplemented as the sixth scenario in this work. This combination then represents a range of socio-economic, climate policy, and pollution control scenarios and has been used to investigate the synergistic effects of various future energy developments and emission control policies in this work. Table 1 describes the relevance of the forcing pathway, the rationale for the choice of driving SSP, and the resulting government climate and environmental actions for each emission scenario.
The description of scenarios designed in this study.
The total power generation in China has significantly increased by 132.6 %
during 2005–2015, which is primarily driven by population growth,
industrialization and urbanization (NBS, 2006 and 2016; Tong et al., 2018a).
However, up to 71 % of China's power generation was coal-fired in 2015.
Given the dominant role of coal-fired power generation, China's government
has promoted the development of clean energy in the power sector. Meanwhile,
China has also undertaken great efforts to improve the efficiency of
coal-fired power units by retiring small and inefficient coal-fired units
and building large and high-efficiency units. The optimization of the
generation unit fleet mix caused a significant decrease in the coal
consumption rate by 91.3 gce kW h
The energy scenarios adopted in this study reflect different evolution of
energy structure and power unit fleet in the power sector. Low radiative
forcing targets represent aggressive low-carbon energy transformation
required in the future, as well as advanced carbon removal technologies
(e.g. carbon capture and storage, CCS). Under the SSP1-26 scenario, it is
projected that the share of coal-fired electricity will decrease to 14.1 % in
2050 (including 8.3 % of the coal-fired with CCS electricity share) compared to
77.6 % in 2050 under the SSP5-85 scenario. Accordingly, the rapid
reduction in coal-fired electricity implies the early retirement of
the currently operating coal-fired power capacity in our turnover model.
According to estimates, 65 % and 45 % of current coal-fired power
capacity needs to be retired early (lifetimes
Meanwhile, five energy scenarios also reflect various efforts on future energy efficiency improvements. It is projected that the net coal consumption rate decreases of 12.7 %, 12.1 %, 11.3 %, 11.9 %, and 10.4 % during 2015–2050 will be achieved under the SSP1-26, SSP2-45, SSP3-70, SSP4-60, and SSP5-85 scenarios, respectively. The achievement of energy efficiency improvement relies not only on the optimization of the future power unit fleet but also on the application of advanced technologies for newly built units (e.g. ultra-supercritical technology). The penetration rates of advanced technologies are estimated and integrated into our projection model.
During 2005–2015, the energy consumption of China's industrial sector greatly increased by 35.7 % (from 1879.1 to 2922.8 million tce – tonnes of coal equivalent), which is driven by rapid industrial development and ever-increasing demand of energy-intensive products (NBS, 2007 and 2016). In contrast, the energy intensity per unit GDP in the industry sector rapidly decreased during the same period. In recent years, the Chinese government has greatly adjusted the industrial structure by phasing out outdated industrial technologies and capacities, especially in key industries (e.g. coal-fired boilers, steel and iron plants, and cement plants; Zhang et al., 2019a). Meanwhile, China aims to save energy through industrial energy transformation and energy efficiency improvement.
For industrial boilers, China first proposed eliminating coal-fired boilers
with capacities smaller than 7 MW by the end of 2017 in the Action Plan.
Energy is saved through both the replacement of large high-efficiency
coal-fired boilers and switching to other clean-energy-fired boilers. The
evolution of boiler fleet turnover under different energy scenarios was
fully simulated in our projection model. Similar to the SSP1-26 scenario,
the coal used in industrial boilers decreases rapidly, with 54.3 % of coal
saved in 2050 compared to 2015. Accordingly, the reduction in coal use would
reduce the capacity demand of coal-fired boilers and drive the early
retirement (typical lifespan
Similarly, to reduce energy intensity, the outmoded production technologies would be replaced with more energy-efficient ones in the steel and iron industry and the cement industry. The facility fleet turnover is simulated under various retirement policies created from corresponding energy scenarios. As a result, under the SSP1-26 scenario, to restrict the development of energy-intensive heavy industry, the total production of steel and cement is projected to decrease by 55.3 % and 93.9 % during 2015–2050, respectively.
Residential energy consumption in China has steadily increased in the past few decades, driven by increases in total population and building areas (Wang et al., 2014). The total energy consumption in the residential sector increased by 44.9 % from 2005 to 2015, with a 4.2 % annual average growth rate (NBS, 2007, 2016). In recent years, the Chinese government has promoted a series of energy-saving measures to fight against air pollution from the residential sector, including the use of clean energy and clean use of coal (Shen et al., 2019). On the one hand, coal cleaning technologies (e.g. coal washing) are in widespread use, and the coal-washing rate is required to be up to 65 % by the end of 2015 according to the energy development of the 12th FYP. On the other hand, China aimed to switch residential coal to other types of clean energy (e.g. natural gas, electricity, or renewable energy). For instance, by the end of 2017, energy consumption in 6 million households in China (4.8 million households in BTH and surrounding regions) switched from coal to electricity and natural gas (Zhang et al., 2019a).
As estimated in GCAM-China and processed through our energy module, we estimated that approximately 63.0 and 27.3 million households nationwide would switch from coal to electricity and natural gas by 2050 under the SSP1-26 and SSP2-45 scenarios, respectively. Accordingly, 181.3 and 73.9 million tonnes of coal energy are saved by 2050 under the SSP1-26 and SSP2-45 scenarios, respectively, compared to the SSP5-85 scenario. Coal washing can not only substantially reduce air pollution emissions by lowering the ash and sulfur contents in coal but also improve the thermal efficiency. The shares of washed coal during 2015–2050 are estimated according to current energy-saving policies and assumptions of future energy-saving policies under different energy scenarios because GCAM-China cannot reflect these measures due to no specific coal classification. We assumed that a measure of coal washing would continue to be carried out in the future under the SSP1-26 and SSP2-45 scenarios to fit other energy-saving measures under low radiative forcing targets. We estimated that 85 % and 55 % of coal-washing rates would be achieved by 2050 under the SSP1-26 and SSP2-45 scenarios, respectively.
Attributed to the dramatic rise in the total number of vehicles, the energy
consumption in China's transportation sector grew 104.9 % in total during
2005–2015 (NBS, 2007 and 2016). Energy consumed in the transportation sector
can be saved by improving fuel efficiency and promoting electric vehicles
(Wang et al., 2014). China has implemented fuel-efficiency standards for
light-duty vehicles since 2004, and an updated standard issued in 2011
requires that the efficiency for passenger cars is up to 14.3 km L
Energy scenarios from GCAM-China are adopted to estimate future vehicle
fleet turnover. It is projected that the total vehicle population would be
up to 2.64, 2.29, 2.06, 2.34, and 3.25 billion by 2050 under the SSP1-26,
SSP2-45, SSP3-70, SSP4-60, and SSP5-85 scenarios, respectively. We found
that the share of electric vehicles is as low as 13.8 %, even under the
SSP1-26 scenario, which underestimates the future development of electric
vehicles in China according China's 13th FYP development planning of
electric vehicles. For consistency, we followed the energy structure and
related assumptions from GCAM-China in our emission projections. The
improvement in fuel efficiencies for each vehicle type reflected in
GCAM-China is also estimated though energy consumption and projected vehicle
kilometres travelled (VKTs), which has been integrated into our fleet turnover
model. As a result, there is a slight but consistent improvement in the
average fuel economy. Under the SSP1-26 scenario, fuel efficiency increases
from 4.8 km L
Policy evolution under each emission scenario in the power sector during 2015–2050. The power sector is divided into coal-fired power plants and other thermal power plants. Policies in each emission source are strengthened in the order of blue, green, and orange, and gradient colour reflects the transition from one standard to another during certain years (from a solid line to a dashed line). The superscripted numbers represent different policies or standards, and the same superscripted number represents the same policies or standards applied in various regions.
Figure 3 shows the policy evolution under each emission scenario in the
power sector. Under the BAU scenario, we assumed that all the coal-fired
power plants would follow the emission limits of the standard GB 13223-2011
until 2050. The emission limits for
Policy evolution under each emission scenario in the industry sector during 2015–2050. Here the industry sector is divided into seven subsectors (i.e. coal-fired boilers, iron and steel plants, cement plants, nonferrous metal, flat glass, brick–lime, and other industries, as well as key VOC-related industries). Policies in each emission source are strengthened in the order of blue, green, orange, and yellow, and gradient colour reflects the transition from one standard to another during certain years (from a solid line to a dashed line). The superscripted numbers represent different policies or standards, and the same superscripted number represents the same policies or standards applied in various regions.
The industrial sector includes various subsectors, as described above. Figure 4 shows the evolution of emission control policies in different subsectors under three emission scenarios, as we can see, emissions from all the main industries are regulated through national emission standards, except the key VOC-related industries (i.e. the petrochemical industry), by 2015. All the regions would follow these current emission standards until 2050, and there are no specific regulations for key VOC-related industries under the BAU scenario. Furthermore, under the ECP scenario, ultra-low emission transformation is assumed to be completed in all industries by the end of 2030 except the key VOC-related industries. We also assumed the key VOC-related industries would reach low emission levels through current mature VOC-removal technologies (Fig. 4). More precisely, based on the ultra-low emission standards, all industries would achieve the BAT recommended values by the end of 2050 under the BHE scenario.
Different emission scenarios reflect to what extent the emission standards are strengthened; here, we comprehensively considered the evolution differentiations among subsectors and regions. First, we assumed that the completion year for each standard or policy in key control zones is a few years earlier than other regions in China according to the promulgated policies. For instance, a policy on ultra-low emission transformation in the iron and steel industry is implemented in 2019, which requires the completion of retrofits using the ultra-low emission technique in key regions (i.e. the BTH and Fenwei Plain, and the YRD region) by the end of 2025. Therefore, we assumed that all the ultra-low emission retrofits would be finished in other regions by the end of 2030. Second, subsectoral differentiation within the same policy is considered. Taking the ultra-low emission standard as an example, we assumed that the ultra-low emission standard would eventually be achieved in all industries. The ultra-low emission standard was first raised in coal-fired power plants, which was implemented in 2016 and would be completed nationwide by the end of 2020 as planned. Hereafter, the ultra-low emission standard for the iron and steel plants was issued in 2019, which required the retrofits to be completed to at least 80 % capacity nationwide by the end of 2025. Following the coal-fired power plants and iron and steel plants, we projected an ultra-low emission standard for cement plants that would then be proposed during 2020–2025, and retrofits would be accomplished by 2030.
There is no specific regulation in the residential sector before 2015; therefore, we assumed that emissions from the residential sector are not regulated under the BAU scenario (Fig. S6). Under the ECP scenario, clean coal and advanced stoves have been promoted to reduce emissions in recent environmental policies. We assumed continual upgrades for stoves and coal washing to reach relatively low emission levels through 2030. While under the BHE scenario, for the long-term air quality target, we supplemented the enhanced controls through innovations of stoves and residential coal stoves until 2050.
Emission reductions from the transportation sector are mainly achieved through fleet turnover in recent years, which means that old vehicles are being replaced by newer, cleaner models subjected to tougher emission standards (Zheng et al., 2018). Therefore, upgrading emission standards plays a vital role in reducing emissions. We modelled the evolution of emission standards for light-duty gasoline vehicles, and heavy-duty gasoline vehicles, light-duty diesel vehicles, heavy-duty diesel vehicles for on-road transportation and off-road transportation (Fig. S5). Under the BAU scenario, we assume that all the registered vehicles comply with the emission standards issued before 2017 and through 2050 with no more stringent emission standards. Therefore, China V emission standards for all on-road vehicles except heavy-duty gasoline vehicles (China IV) are implemented under this scenario. The China III emission standard for off-road transport is implemented. To reduce emissions, further implementation of China VI emission standards for all on-road vehicles and China V for off-road transport is assumed under the ECP scenario. Under the most stringent scenario (BHE scenario), “assumed China VII” emission standards for all on-road vehicles and China VI emission standards for off-road transport would be gradually implemented during 2030–2050.
Similar to the VOC-related industries, there are currently no specific regulations for controlling VOC emissions from solvent use. Therefore, we assumed that no effective regulations are implemented under the BAU scenario. Under the ECP scenario, to reach low emission levels of VOCs, we further improved the water-soluble solvent use and installed widespread VOC control facilities in the coating and painting industry. Note that emissions decrease to relatively low levels in the key control zones earlier than in the other regions. Under the BHE scenario, to maximally reduce VOC emissions, we considered the innovations of solvent use and VOC control facilities in the last 5 years before 2050 (2045–2050) according to the best-available technologies from developed countries (European Commission, 2016).
Evolution of primary energy structure under different scenarios.
The scenarios plotted here include
Agriculture is one of the least-controlled emission sources in recent years
(Zheng et al., 2018). We assumed enhancement of
Figure 5 shows the yearly evolution of the primary energy structure under
five energy scenarios during 2015–2050. At present, coal is the main primary
energy source, accounting for more than 60 % of the total primary energy
in 2015. Under the lax climate targets, coal will continue to have the
dominant role in the future's energy supply structure. We can see a similar
future primary energy structure under the SSP3-70, SSP4-60, and SSP5-85
energy scenarios, and the coal fractions are relatively stable until 2050
and close to those in 2015. For the other energy sources, there are obvious
increases in the use of gas and biomass sources under the SSP3-70, SSP4-60,
and SSP5-85 energy scenarios, in total accounting for 13.9 %, 16.4 %,
and 16.1 % in 2050 compared to
China's future energy consumption in the years 2020, 2030, and 2050
under five energy scenarios. The fuel types plotted here include
To investigate the changes in sectoral energy consumption, Fig. 6 further
shows coal, liquids, and gas consumption in 2020, 2030, and 2050 in the
power, industry, residential, and transportation sectors, under
five energy scenarios. As shown in Fig. 6, we can see the different energy
consumption structures among sectors, and coal is mainly consumed in the
power and industry sectors. Only under the SSP1-26 scenario is the
future's total consumption of coal decreased compared to 2015. By 2050, the
total coal consumption could reach nearly 6 billion tonnes by 2050 under the
SSP5-85 scenario with an
Liquid consumption shows a significant increase in the transportation sector even under the SSP1-26 scenario due to the ever-increasing vehicle demand and limited fuel switching considered in the GCAM-China model (Fig. S7). Thus, 16.3 %, 71.7 %, and 126.6 % increases are achieved in the transportation sector in 2020, 2030, and 2050, respectively, under the SSP1-26 scenario compared to 2015. The liquid consumption in the industrial sector is relatively stable with small changes. The growth rates of total liquid consumption slow down during 2030–2050 under all energy scenarios except the SSSP5-85 scenario, which is mainly driven by changes in liquid consumption in the transportation sector. Gas is mainly consumed in the industrial, residential, and power sectors, accounting for 58.2 %, 23.1 %, and 18.1 %, respectively, of the total consumption in 2015. In the future, more gas would be consumed under the lower global warming target because gas is defined as a clean fossil fuel compared to coal and liquids. The increase in gas consumption mainly occurs in the residential sector under all energy scenarios driven by the ever-increasing demand and energy policy of replacing coal with gas in the future's residential energy structure. Under the most stringent climate target, gas consumption increased by 199.4 % from 2015 to 2050 compared to 54.1 % in the power sector and 79.7 % in the industry sector. In total, the more stringent the climate target is, the larger the required adjustments in the future energy structure.
Emissions of major air pollutants in China from 2010 to 2050. The
species plotted here include
Figure 7 shows the historical and future emission trends of major air
pollutant emissions (
Anthropogenic emissions of air pollutants in 2015, 2030,
and 2050 under different scenarios (unit: Tg yr
In the SSP3-70-BAU and SSP4-60-BAU scenarios, under the pessimistic
development trends with limited investments and attention to climate and
environmental issues in China, the emissions of major air pollutants would
slightly change except for an obvious increase in
China's future anthropogenic emissions by sector in the
years 2020, 2030, and 2050 under six scenarios. The species plotted here include
In addition, under the same socio-economic and energy pathways, the
SSP1-26-ECP and SSP1-26-BHE scenarios have similar emission mitigation
pathways during 2015–2030 due to similar and strict enforcement of
environmental policies, while the SSP1-26-BHE scenario can further reduce
Different sectors have different emission reduction potential and
mitigation pathways under various scenarios. Figure 8 further shows the
sectoral emission contributions of major air pollutants under all designed
scenarios in the years 2020, 2030, and 2050. As shown in Fig. 8, the most
important sector identified in 2015 is the industrial sector for all major
air pollutants, which contributes 59 %, 41 %, 48 %, and 33 % of
The reductions in PM
Comparison of future emissions estimated in this study with
estimates from the harmonized CMIP6 emissions dataset. The species plotted here include
In this study, although we created our scenarios based on the CMIP6 global
development modes and societal conditions, more realistic short- and
long-term emission control policies are integrated into our emission
scenarios in China. Here, we compare the emissions under corresponding
scenarios from our study and the harmonized CMIP6 emissions dataset (Fig. 9; Gidden et al.,
2019). There are obvious gaps for major air pollutant emissions in the base
year except for NMVOCs, and the
Comparison of future
Additionally, we compared the
In particular, we compare the sectoral emissions under the SSP1-26-BHE
scenario from this work and the SSP1-26-strong scenario from the CMIP6
database, and the sector maps are shown in Table S4. As shown in Fig. 11,
the differences in the base year are mainly contributed by industry for the
The comparison of sectoral emissions between the SSP1-26-BHE scenario
from the DPEC from this study and SSP1-26-strong scenario from the harmonized CMIP6 emissions dataset.
In this study, a dynamic emission projection model was developed to estimate
the evolution of future air pollutants and
There are several limitations and uncertainties in this study. First, the
energy scenarios we used in this work are derived from the GCAM-China model,
in which the reference scenario is counterfactual and does not explicitly
consider mitigation actions. For instance, China aims to develop renewable
energy in the power sector to create clean electricity in the future. The
effects of clean energy power are expected to increase rapidly in the
future. As announced in the 13th FYP, the generation share of renewable
energy is planned to increase to 27 % by 2020. Even the SSP1-26 scenario
underestimates the actions taken on the adjustment of power energy structure
by the Chinese government (20 % of renewable energy in 2020; Fig. S8).
Additionally, China has launched several initiatives to promote electric
vehicles and aims to increase the number of electric vehicles to 5 million in 2020 according to the development plan for new-energy vehicles
(Wang et al., 2014). In contrast, all the energy scenarios obtained from the
GCAM-China model except the SSP1-26 scenario have low projections of the
future effects of electric vehicles (Fig. S7), and the effects of
new-energy vehicles only increase to
Secondly, the policies promulgated from governments usually only have macro measures and completion years without yearly detailed and parameterized actions. Our parameterized process within each scenario may underestimate or overestimate the emission reductions from each measure. For example, the effectiveness of measures targeting small and scattered emission sources (e.g. phasing out small and old industrial factories and eliminating small coal-fired industrial boilers) is difficult to evaluate and reasonably parameterize, which may lead to higher uncertainty ranges in future emission estimates.
Thirdly, the CMIP6 dataset we applied to compare is from different IAMs. Both assumptions and models would impact the results among different scenarios, but we only considered the impacts of scenario assumptions and included policies in our study. Future studies should focus on the discrepancies and be led by different IAMs, including design sensitivity simulations with fixed IAMs to quantify the uncertainties.
Finally, emission estimates in the base year are uncertain due to incomplete knowledge of underlying data (Zhao et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2015). The uncertainties from the historical emission inventories are widely quantified in previous works (e.g. Zhang et al., 2009; Lei et al., 2011a; Lu et al., 2011; Li et al., 2017). These uncertainties may pass to our projection model and create new uncertainties in the emission reduction rates and future emission mitigation pathways, but there are few impacts on the emission estimates for the year 2050.
Air quality improvement and climate change governance are of equal
importance in future environmental management for China. Both air
pollution and climate change issues are essentially energy problems,
especially coal problems in the current state of China. On the one hand,
actions of energy conservation and low-carbon energy transitions to reduce
Emission data (China's future emission scenario and database 2015–2050) generated from this study are available at
The supplement related to this article is available online at:
QZ designed the research; DT, JC, YL, LY, CH, YQ, HZ, and YZ developed the emission projection model; SY and LC developed the GCAM-China model; ML, FL, and BZ provided historical emission data; QZ, DT, JC, YL, SY, GG, and LC developed future emission scenarios and interpreted data; DT, JC, and QZ prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This work was supported by the National Key R&D programme and the National Natural Science Foundation of China. We thank the Energy Foundation China and the National Research Program for key issues in air pollution control for financial support. Sha Yu was supported by the Global Technology Strategy Project (GTSP).
This research has been supported by the National Key R&D program (grant no. 2016YFC0208801), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 91744310, 41921005, and 41625020), the Energy Foundation China (G-1806-28044), and the National Research Program for key issues in air pollution control (DQGG0201).
This paper was edited by Aijun Ding and reviewed by two anonymous referees.