<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-20-5327-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Physico-chemical characterization of urban aerosols from specific combustion
sources in West Africa at Abidjan in Côte d'Ivoire and Cotonou in Benin
in the frame of the DACCIWA program</article-title><alt-title>Physico-chemical characterization of urban aerosols</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Physico-chemical characterization of urban aerosols}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~J.~Adon et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Adon</surname><given-names>Aka Jacques</given-names></name>
          <email>adonjacks@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7618-9116</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liousse</surname><given-names>Catherine</given-names></name>
          <email>lioc@aero.obs-mip.fr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Doumbia</surname><given-names>Elhadji Thierno</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Baeza-Squiban</surname><given-names>Armelle</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cachier</surname><given-names>Hélène</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Léon</surname><given-names>Jean-Francois</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1251-0361</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Yoboué</surname><given-names>Véronique</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Akpo</surname><given-names>Aristique Barthel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Galy-Lacaux</surname><given-names>Corinne</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Guinot</surname><given-names>Benjamin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8180-8954</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Zouiten</surname><given-names>Cyril</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff7">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Hongmei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4217-5066</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gardrat</surname><given-names>Eric</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Keita</surname><given-names>Sekou</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7181-8382</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratoire d'Aérologie, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS,
Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Centre National de Recherche Météorologiques (CNRM) UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Réponses Moléculaires et Cellulaires aux Xénobiotiques_RMCX, Université Paris Diderot, Unité de Biologie Fonctionnelle et
Adaptative-RMCX, CNRS, UMR 8251, Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Laboratoire de Physique de l'Atmosphère, Université
Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan BPV 34, Côte d'Ivoire</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Laboratoire de Physique du Rayonnement, Université
d'Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Géosciences Environnement Toulouse, Université de Toulouse,
CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong
University, Xi'an,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>UFR Sciences Biologiques, Université Péléforo-Gbon-Coulibaly de Khorogo, BP 1328 Khorogo, Côte d'Ivoire</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Aka Jacques Adon (adonjacks@gmail.com)  and Catherine Liousse (lioc@aero.obs-mip.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>May</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>5327</fpage><lpage>5354</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>11</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>March</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>March</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e250">Urban air pollution in West Africa has yet to be well characterized. In the
frame of DACCIWA (Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West
Africa) program, intensive measurement campaigns were performed in Abidjan
(Côte d'Ivoire) and Cotonou (Benin), in dry (January 2016 and 2017) and
wet (July 2015 and 2016) seasons, at different sites chosen to be
representative of African urban combustion sources, i.e., domestic fires
(ADF), traffic (AT) and waste burning (AWB) sources in Abidjan and traffic
source in Cotonou (CT). Both the size distribution of particulate matter
(PM) and their chemical composition including elemental carbon (EC), organic
carbon (OC), water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC), water-soluble inorganic
ions (WSI) and trace metals were examined. Results show very high PM
concentrations at all sites and a well-marked seasonality as well as a
strong spatial variation. The average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations
during the wet season are 517.3, 104.1, 90.3, and 69.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
the ADF, CT, AT, and AWB sites, respectively. In the dry season, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations decrease to 375.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the ADF site, while
they increase to 269.7, 141.3, and 175.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the CT, AT, and
AWB sites, respectively. The annual PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels at almost all sites
are significantly higher than the WHO guideline level of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As for PM mass, (EC) and (OC) concentrations are also maximal at
the ADF site, accounting for up to 69 % of the total PM mass. Such a high content is
mainly linked to wood burning for domestic cooking and commercial food
smoking activities. Dust contributions are dominant at CT (57 %–80 %), AT
(20 %–70 %), and AWB (30 %–69 %) sites and especially in the coarse and fine-particle modes at the CT site and in the coarse fraction at the AT site, which may be
explained by the impact of long-range desert-dust transport and resuspended
particles from the roads, in addition to anthropogenic sources. The
contributions of WSI to the total PM mass, mainly driven by chloride,
nitrate, and calcium in the fine and/or large particles, are highly variable
according to the sites but remain less than 30 %. Values are generally 1–3 times higher in the wet season than in the dry season. This is due not only to
anthropogenic emissions but also to nitrate formation by reaction processes
and natural emissions. The concentrations of trace elements reflect well the
trends in dust at the traffic and AWB sites, with a predominance<?pagebreak page5328?> of Al, Na,
Ca, Fe, and K, keys markers of crustal dust. This study constitutes an
original database that characterizes specific African combustion sources.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e370">The impact of anthropogenic pollution on environment and health has been
demonstrated by numerous studies in Europe and North America, which have
contributed to the implementation of emission reduction policies. By
contrast, air pollution in Africa is far from being well characterized,
although it is suspected to be responsible for negative health outcomes
(WHO, 2014). This is a major problem since Africa is an intense emitter of pollution
from anthropogenic sources that include domestic fires, vehicular traffic,
waste burning, and growing oil and mining industries. It has also one
of the fastest growing urban populations in the world, especially in West
and East Africa (United Nations, 2019). As a consequence, it has been shown that massive
urbanization and rapid economic growth could be responsible for tripling
anthropogenic emissions in Africa between 2000 and 2030 (Liousse et al., 2014). Moreover, it is
important to recall the impact of biomass burning and dust sources in the
African atmospheric composition, especially occurring during the dry season.
All of this results in a major degradation of urban air quality and an
impact on the health of exposed populations. Only a few studies on this
subject have been conducted in West Africa (Val et al., 2013; Dieme et al., 2012; Kouassi et al., 2009) despite the high
atmospheric pollutant concentrations already measured to be on the same
order as in Asian megacities and well above WHO international standards
(WHO, 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e373">West Africa is then a unique laboratory to study urban pollution.
Previous studies conducted under the framework of the AMMA (Analyses
Multidisciplinaires de la Mousson Africaine) and POLCA (POLlution des
Capitales Africaines) programs have revealed very high average particulate
mass concentrations in Cotonou (Benin), Bamako (Mali), Dakar (Senegal), and
Yaoundé (Cameroon) during the dry season (Doumbia et al., 2012; Val et al., 2013), suggesting that the
population may be affected by negative health outcomes. For example, during
the dry season in Bamako (Mali) and Dakar (Senegal), Val et al. (2013) showed that the
inflammatory impact of combustion aerosol depends on the type of emission
sources and determined the predominant role of particulate organic matter.
This is consistent with global findings showing that fine and ultrafine
aerosol fractions, as well as their content in trace metals and organic
compounds, induce biological effects due to their ability to reach the
distal lung (Cassee et al., 2013). Such reasons highlight the need to better understand the
size-speciation of the aerosol chemical composition of the main West African
anthropogenic sources during the different seasons. Within this context, the
DACCIWA (Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa)
program dedicated a specific work package to “Air Pollution and Health”
dealing with pollutant characterization related to health issues through
toxicological studies and epidemiological studies.</p>
      <p id="d1e376">Campaigns have been organized from December 2014 to March 2017 in Abidjan
and Cotonou. The strategy was to measure aerosol chemical composition in
different sites, representative of the main prevailing urban sources in West
Africa following Liousse et al. (2014) and Keita et al. (2018). Two typical traffic-sampling sites were chosen, one
in Abidjan (Côte d'Ivoire) and another one in Cotonou (Benin), to take
into account differences in terms of fleets, type of fuel used, and quality
of roads. Indeed, in Cotonou, the majority of population uses two-wheel
vehicles using gasoline fuel or gasoline and oil fuel, whereas in Abidjan,
the vehicle fleet is dominated by four-wheel engines using diesel fuel.
Measurements were also performed at domestic fire and waste burning sites,
both located in Abidjan.</p>
      <p id="d1e379">For a period of 2 years, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass and carbonaceous  aerosol
were weekly measured, and results are discussed in Djossou et al. (2018). In this paper, we focus
on the results from the intensive campaigns. We present measurements
obtained at each site during the wet and dry seasons of the studied periods:
(i) PM size distribution and mass concentrations; (ii) PM chemical
composition including carbonaceous aerosol, water-soluble organic carbon,
water-soluble inorganic ions, dust, and trace elements in different size
fractions. Experimental method including description of sites, types of
measurements and analyses, and meteorological conditions will be presented in
the Sect. 2, whereas results and discussion are discussed in the Sects. 3 and 4 of the paper, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental method</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Description of sites</title>
      <p id="d1e406">Measurement campaigns have been performed in wet seasons (20–26 July 2015
and 4–13 July 2016) and dry seasons (7–15 January 2016 and 5–14 January 2017) at three sites in Abidjan (Côte d'Ivoire), representative of
different sources, i.e., ADF for Abidjan domestic fires, AWB for Abidjan
waste burning, and AT for Abidjan traffic (Fig. 1), and one traffic
site in Cotonou (Benin) (Fig. 2).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e411">Map of the city of Abidjan reporting the geographical location of
DACCIWA urban sampling sites.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e422">Map of the city of Cotonou reporting the geographical location of
DACCIWA urban sampling site.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e432">As shown in Fig. 3, which presents pictures of the different sampling
sites, the ADF site (5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>19<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>06<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) is
situated on a platform, 5 m above ground level, in Yopougon Bracody district
near a market (Fig. 1). This geographical area is highly populated with
various small commercial activities such as fish and meat smoking by
women. There are also many formal and informal settlements, which mainly use
wood and charcoal as a source of fuel for private and professional
combustion activities. Other sources of concern<?pagebreak page5329?> contributing to the mix of
pollutant emissions in the area include transportation-related emissions,
biomass burning, garbage bins or small landfills, and various other fugitive
sources. The AT site (5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>04<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) is
located in Adjamé, on the roof of the “220 pharmacie logement” building,
about 7 m above ground level and roughly 10 m away from the main road. This
site, close to the Adjamé market and to a bus station, is highly
affected by traffic (Gbaka, bus, taxi, woro-woro, private cars, etc.). The AWB site (5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>56<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) is located
in Akouédo in the district of Cocody, on the roof of “ Talafiguié”, a building 15 m above ground level. This site, close to the big municipal
landfill of Abidjan operational since 1965 and now covering an area of 153
ha, is submitted to frequent waste burning pollution. The Cotonou traffic
(CT) (6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>19<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) site is located in
Cotonou, on the “Sogema” building roof, about 7 m above ground level. This
site is close to the Dantokpa market and also to the biggest crossroad of
Cotonou (intersection of four main roads). This site is highly influenced by
intense traffic activities. As previously mentioned, such a site is
interesting because the vehicle fleet and fuels are different in Cotonou
compared to Abidjan in the following ways: (1) there are many two-wheel vehicles in Cotonou, while a few only in Abidjan; (2) in Cotonou, gasoline is of poor quality
due to the illegal fuel transport from Nigeria, and (3) the roads are in
worse conditions in Cotonou than in Abidjan.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e681">Pictures of the different sampling sites: <bold>(a)</bold> traffic in Cotonou
(Benin, CT station); <bold>(b)</bold> waste burning in Abidjan (Côte d'Ivoire, AWB
station); <bold>(c)</bold> domestic fire, showing smoking activity in Yopougon, Abidjan
(Côte d'Ivoire, ADF station); and <bold>(d)</bold> “woro-woro and Gbaka” traffic in
Abidjan (Côte d'Ivoire, AT station).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e710">During each intensive campaign and on each site, two 3 h samples
collected with cascade impactors operating in parallel are obtained for
3 consecutive days (i.e., six size-resolved samples per site during each
campaign), to allow size-speciated characterization of the aerosol chemical
composition. Note that the choice of the 3 h periods is linked to the
period of maximum pollution for each site as shown by preliminary studies, e.g., morning at the ADF site (07:00–10:00 am), afternoon at the AT site (04:00–07:00 pm, and morning at the
CT site (07:00–10:00 am). There is no specific period at AWB site since the
activities are roughly the same during the day. The first impactor with four stages (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) includes four quartz fiber filters (QMA, Whatman) for mass and carbonaceous aerosol (EC,
OC, and WSOC analysis). The second impactor with three stages (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>;
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is equipped with three Teflon filters (Zefluor,
Pall Corporation<sup>®</sup>), dedicated to water-soluble ions species
and trace elements. Due to operational problems in July 2016, this second
three-stage cascade impactor is replaced by another three-stage cascade impactor
with different size cuts (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).<?pagebreak page5330?> For
consistency, results will be presented as an ultrafine (UF), fine (F), and
coarse (C) classification. The two first stages (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) being considered as the coarse particulate fraction, the
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stage, the fine particulate fraction and the
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stage, the ultrafine fraction.</p>
      <p id="d1e916">All of the filters are prepared and analyzed at the Laboratoire d'Aerologie in
Toulouse under different protocols described in the following paragraphs.
Note that the quartz filters are pre-fired before sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Analyses</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Gravimetric analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e934">Aerosol mass concentrations are obtained using a high-precision balance
(Sartorius MC21S), placed under a controlled temperature and humidity
atmosphere (Person and Tymen, 2005). Before weighing, the filters are kept
24 h in the weighing room at an ambient relative humidity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. The filters are weighed before and after sampling. The result of a
gravimetric measurement consists of an average of two to four weighings whose
differences do not exceed 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g. The standard error on a gravimetric
measurement is therefore less than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g, typically representing less
than 5 % of the particles mass.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Carbonaceous aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e973">Carbonaceous aerosol is determined with thermal analysis with a two-step
method adapted from Cachier et al. (1989). Two aliquots of the same filter
are separately analyzed.</p>
      <p id="d1e976">One portion is directly analyzed for its total carbon content (TC). The
other portion is first submitted to a pre-combustion step (2 h at
340 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C under pure oxygen) in order to eliminate organic carbon
(OC) and then analyzed for its elemental carbon (EC) content. Organic
carbon (OC) concentrations are calculated as the differences between TC and
EC. Note that the aerosol carbon content is quantified by a nondispersive
infrared (NDIR) detector with G4 ICARUS instrument with a detection limit on
the order of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g C cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Uncertainty is on the order of 5 %
for TC, while being in the range of 5 %–20 %, for EC and OC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>2.3.3</label><title>Water-soluble organic carbon analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1016">WSOC measurements are performed using a total organic carbon analyzer
(Sievers M9). A detailed description of this technique is reported in Favez
et al. (2008). Briefly, the full oxidation of total organic carbon into
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained by coupling chemical oxidation (with ammonium
persulphate) and UV light. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is then quantified by conductivity.
Analyses are conducted on 20 mL of solution extracts. For UF samples,
solutions to be analyzed are obtained using a total filter surface of
3 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> punches symmetrically taken
out of each QMA filter), whereas, for C and F sizes, due to the geometry of
the spots at the surface of the filters, samples are divided into equivalent
parts (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 47 mm filters, the rest of the filters being used for
carbonaceous analysis). The extraction protocol consists of 16 h soaking
under soft shaking in an Erlen–Meyer flask containing 20 mL of ultrapure water.
Prior to WSOC analysis, water extracts are filtered through Teflon (PTFE)
filters (0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size diameter) in order to remove any suspended
particles. Measurement uncertainty, given by the manufacturer, is on the
order of 7 %. The overall calculated blank value is on the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g C cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which represents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of
the mean WSOC content. For each sample, duplicate analyses show good
reproducibility.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4">
  <label>2.3.4</label><title>Water-soluble ionic species</title>
      <p id="d1e1155">Water-soluble ionic species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are analyzed using an
ion chromatograph (IC), following the analytical protocol described in Adon
et al. (2010). Briefly, the aerosol water-soluble fraction is first
extracted from half-sampled Teflon filter (the other part being used for
trace element analysis), with a 10 min sonication in plastic vials including
6 mL or 10 mL of purified water with a controlled resistivity of
18.2 M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Then these vials are subjected to ionic chromatograph
analysis or stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C if not analyzed immediately. Cations
are analyzed with Dionex DX-100 and anions with Dionex DX-500 with a
detection limit of 1 to 6 ppb depending on ionic species. Uncertainties in
the range of 1 %–50 % are found depending on ionic species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS5">
  <label>2.3.5</label><title>Trace elements</title>
      <p id="d1e1294">The protocol to measure trace element concentrations is developed and
performed at the Laboratory of Environmental Geosciences of Toulouse.
Half-sampled Teflon filters (the other part being used for water-soluble
ionic species; see below) are mineralized by acid digestion with a 10 mL
concentrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.5 mL HF solution (Lamaison, 2006) using a
closed vessel microwave accelerated reaction system (MARS 5, CEM
Corporation) at high pressure (700 psi) (Celo et al., 2010). The digestion is
realized in three steps: a rise in temperature at 130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in 3 min and
holding for 1 min, then a second rise at 160 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in 1 min and
holding for 30 s, and finally a third rise to 180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in 1 min
and holding for 3 min. After a 12 h cooling period, the solutions are
evaporated at 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and concentrated in 7 mL of 2 %
concentrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution, before analysis by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), which is
performed with a 7500 CE Agilent Technologies instrument equipped with a
collision cell and using In and Re as internal standards. The detection
limit is less than 10 ppt. For all of the samples, the final blank values and
detection limit on filters are taken into account for final concentrations
calculations. In this work, we<?pagebreak page5331?> consider 13 trace metals: Al, Ti, Cr, Mn,
Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ba, La, Th, Pb, and Cd.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS6">
  <label>2.3.6</label><title>Dust calculation</title>
      <p id="d1e1364">Many methods can be used to quantify dust concentrations. We have selected
three methods (Sciare et al., 2005; Guinot et al., 2007; Terzi et al., 2010) to
underline the uncertainties linked to dust estimates.</p>
      <p id="d1e1367">The Sciare et al. (2005) method consists of using soluble calcium data obtained
with ionic chromatography (IC), to estimate the dust concentrations
following the relationship: dust <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> nss-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
nss-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.038 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) refers to non-sea-salt
calcium concentration.</p>
      <p id="d1e1459">The Guinot et al. (2007) method is based on a chemical closure where fine- and
coarse-particle aerosols are separated into four components (EC, POM, WSI, and
dust). EC, WSI, and total aerosol mass are directly experimentally
determined (see paragraphs below). POM concentrations are obtained from OC
concentrations that are experimentally determined and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> POM conversion
factor. Dust concentrations are obtained from measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the abundance of calcium in dust. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
are obtained from a linear regression (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) between the reconstructed and the
weighed aerosol mass concentrations. Briefly, first step consists of
focusing on the aerosol coarse fraction. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is fixed to 1.8, and as a result
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> just mentioned, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained to be in the range of 0.012 to 0.15,
depending on our sites. The second step deals with the aerosol fine fraction.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values just obtained for the aerosol coarse fraction are applied to
the fine fraction, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios are estimated using (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) to be in the range of
1.2 to 2.1. Note that at all of our sites, the correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and the missing mass between the weighed and the reconstructed aerosol mass
is sufficiently good (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to support the consistency of this
simple approach for the evaluation of dust. Also, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are
included in the range of values provided in the literature (He et al., 2001;
Sun et al., 2004; Guinot et al., 2007). However, it is important to mention
that the ranges of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coefficients are large, which is due to the source
mixing observed in this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e1620">In the Terzi et al. (2010) method, dust is obtained with the following
relationship: dust <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.89[Al] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.21[K] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.95[Ca] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.66[Mg] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7
[Ti] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.14[Si] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.42[Fe]. In our study, all of these elements are
determined except for silicon (Si). Consequently, we used mean Si values obtained
from different relationships available in the literature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Alastuey et al. 2005, Si <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Al for Zhang et al.,
2003; and Si <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Al for Chiapello et al., 1997).</p>
      <p id="d1e1744">The results of dust concentrations estimated from the three methodologies
above described are summarized in the Table 1 for the wet season (WS) 2016 and
dry season (DS) 2017. Indeed, Ca, Al, and Fe concentrations measured by
ICP-MS are only available in WS2016 and DS2017 due to experimental problems,
whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations measured by IC are available for all
campaigns. As shown in Table 1, the dust obtained from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by
IC (Sciare et al., 2005) and by the Guinot et al. (2007) method is lower
than that obtained from trace elements (Terzi et al., 2010) for DS2017,
whereas it is of the same order of magnitude in WS2016. Such results are in
agreement with methodological aspects. Indeed, Al, Fe, Ca, etc.
obtained by ICP-MS include both soluble and insoluble particles, whereas
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by IC only includes soluble particles. During the dry
season, comparison of Ca measured by ICP-MS (not shown here) is higher than
that of the IC, by factors of 1.7, 1.8, 2.2, and 1.1, at the ADF, AWB, AT,
and CT sites, respectively. By contrast, this factor is low and constant
(1.3) in the wet season for all of the sites. In our study, due to the lack of
trace element data for WS2015 and DS2016, dust estimations are performed
from the Guinot et al. (2007) method. This choice globally implies an
underestimate of dust concentrations by a factor of 1.5 to 3.5 in DS2017 as
shown in Table 1.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1792">Comparison of dust concentrations obtained from different
methodologies, in micrograms per cubic meter.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dry 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sciare et al.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Guinot et al.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Terzi et al.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(2005)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2007)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ADF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">86.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">29.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">bulk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">109.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AWB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">126.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">39.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">106.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">bulk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">88.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">232.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">98.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">bulk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">132.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">70.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">98.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">55.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">bulk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">61.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">115.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">154.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wet 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sciare et al.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Guinot et al.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Terzi et al.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(2005)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2007)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ADF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">35.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AWB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">42.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">52.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bulk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">42.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">52.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS7">
  <label>2.3.7</label><title>Aerosol chemical closure methodology</title>
      <p id="d1e2191">As previously mentioned and detailed, aerosol chemical closure is performed
following the Guinot et al. (2007) methodology.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2196">Wind, pressure, and temperature diagram at Abidjan and Cotonou
during the different campaigns.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page5332?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Meteorological conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e2216">In Fig. 4, meteorological data (surface temperature and wind directions and
speed) issued from the NOAA Integrated Surface database (ISD; see <uri>https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/isd</uri>, last access: 20 November 2018) and the ASECNA (Agence pour la Sécurité de la
Navigation Aérienne en Afrique et à Madagascar) are presented for
the southwestern Africa region including Abidjan and Cotonou. As expected,
this area is under the influence of the convergence zone of two air masses
of a different nature, i.e., Harmattan (hot and dry continental trade winds)
from the north and monsoon (humid maritime trade winds) from the south
(Fig. 4). Ground contact between these two air masses constitutes the
intertropical front (ITF) of which the fluctuations during the year
determine the seasons in the Gulf of Guinea (Tapsoba, 1997). During the dry
season (from November to March), temperatures are relatively high with
a maximum around 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C on the coast. The humidity is low, since the
prevailing Harmattan wind blows from the desert, usually bringing dust
(Fig. 4, lower row). The period from June to September, especially in
July is the wet season period when daytime temperatures are slightly lower,
with a maximum around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C on the coast (Fig. 4, upper row).
At this season, the humidity level is high across the region. On the coast,
rains may occur from March to November.</p>
      <p id="d1e2252">During our campaigns (not shown here), temperatures are roughly the same at
Abidjan and Cotonou, reaching 28  and 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the dry
and wet seasons, respectively. Gentle to moderate wind speeds are observed
during the measurement campaigns at the two cities, with average values of
15–20 and 15–22 km h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at Abidjan and Cotonou, respectively. There is
no precipitation at the CT site during the studied periods. In Abidjan on the
contrary, low rains occur both in wet and dry periods with cumulative
precipitation higher in DS2017 (7 mm) than in WS2016 (4.7 mm) and WS2015
(2 mm). There is no rain in DS2016 (<uri>https://www.historique-meteo.net/afrique/</uri>, last access: 20 December 2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Backward trajectories</title>
      <p id="d1e2288">The Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT)
modeling system (Air resources laboratory, Draxler and Rolph, 2012) is used
for the trajectory analysis. The HYSPLIT model is run to compute 120 h back
trajectories ending at Abidjan and Cotonou at 50 m a.g.l. (Fig. 5).<?pagebreak page5333?> The Global
Data Assimilation System reanalysis database is used as meteorological
input, with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal resolution. Results
presented in Fig. 5 confirm that air masses mainly come from the north
with a few from the southwest in the dry season (January), whereas they come from the
southwest and the south in the wet season (July). Therefore, in January
Abidjan and Cotonou are mainly impacted by polluted air masses from
surrounding areas and northern countries with possible dust and West African
biomass burning influences, whereas in July the impact of oceanic sources
possibly polluted by long-range south African biomass burning aerosols may
be observed.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2311">Back trajectories arriving at Abidjan <bold>(a)</bold> and Cotonou <bold>(b)</bold> for each
season (WS2015, WS2016, DS2016, and DS2017).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Aerosol size distribution and mass concentration</title>
      <p id="d1e2342">In Fig. 6, the relative mass distribution of PM for coarse (C), fine (F),
and ultrafine (UF) particle sizes in percentages are presented with bulk
mass concentration averages indicated in the black boxes for each site and
for each campaign. As it may be seen, bulk concentrations vary widely from
site to site and from campaign to campaign. During the wet season, the
average total concentrations range from 82 to 676 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2015
and from 56 to 358 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2016, with the maximum at the Abidjan
domestic fire (ADF) site. While during the dry season, values range from 168
to 269 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2016 and from 114 to 559 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
2017, with maximum concentration obtained at the Cotonou traffic (CT) and
ADF sites. In terms of size distribution, concentration peaks may be
observed for all aerosol size-fractions which are found to exhibit different
seasonal patterns. UF particles (&lt; 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) represent the
highest contributor to the bulk mass at the ADF site, by up to 60 %
(335.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in DS2017. F particles (1–0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) are the
second most important contributor, and both combined particle sizes account
for more than 85 % of the total mass at the ADF site. In this site,
ultrafine and fine fractions are also found to be maximal during WS2015 and
WS2016 by up to 90 % and 83 %, respectively. Let us note that C particle
contribution in bulk is relatively higher in the traffic and waste burning
sites than at the ADF site (40 %), whereas F and UF particle contributions are
on the order of 60 %.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2465">Aerosol mass concentrations at the different study sites for each
campaign and for the different sizes (C in black, fine in light grey,
ultrafine in grey). Bulk aerosol mass is indicated in boxes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2474">In terms of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the results of this work are presented in Fig. 7. The
mass concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over DS2016 and DS2017 are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">154</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">211</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the ADF, AWB, AT, and CT sites, respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">338</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the wet
seasons (2015–2016). The increase in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is on the order of 54 % at ADF
from the dry to wet season, whereas a sharp reduction (more than 60 %) is
obtained at AWB, AT, and CT sites.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2642">Comparison of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations in micrograms per cubic meter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at
the four sites with those obtained by Djossou et al. (2018) and Xu et al. (2019) for the same sites and periods. Data for the following weeks were
then selected in Djossou et al. (2018): 20–27 July 2015 for WS15, 4–11 January 2016
for DS16, 4–11 July 2016 for WS16, and 9–16 January 2017 for DS17.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=221.931496pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Carbonaceous aerosol</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>EC and OC concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e2697">In Fig. 8, EC relative mass contributions are presented for each size,
site, and campaign as follows: wet season 2015 (WS2015), wet season 2016 (WS2016), dry
season 2016 (DS2016), and dry season 2017 (DS2017). Mean EC bulk mass
concentrations are added in the black boxes for each size and for each
campaign. The most striking feature is that the ADF site concentrations are
higher than at the other sites in WS2016 and DS2017, while on the same
order as CT site concentrations in the other seasons. Mean concentration at
the CT site (16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is slightly higher than at the AT site
(10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas the lowest concentrations are found at the
AWB site. Results of the EC size distribution are very consistent among the
different sites (Fig. 8). Whatever the site and the season, higher EC
concentrations are found in C (42 %) and UF (43 %) particles compared to
F particles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2742">EC relative concentrations in each size classes (C in black, fine
in light grey, ultrafine in grey) at the different study sites for each
campaign. Bulk EC concentration for each site is indicated in boxes.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2751">The same data are presented for OC concentrations in Fig. 9. It may be
underlined that ADF OC values are always higher than in the other sites by a
factor ranging from 6 to 30, for all seasons and particle sizes, with
highest and lowest values, respectively, in DS2017 and DS 2016. In terms of
size distribution, maximum OC concentrations at the ADF site may be found in
UF (53 %), then F (29 %), and finally C (18 %) particles. The same
distribution is observed for the traffic sites in DS2016; however, for the
other campaigns, OC size distribution looks like the EC ones with higher
concentrations in UF and C particles than in F particles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2757">OC relative concentrations in each size classes (C in black, fine
in light grey, ultrafine in grey) at the different study sites for each
campaign. Bulk OC concentration for each site is indicated in boxes.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2766">As shown in Fig. 10, the highest OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratios are always obtained at the
ADF site with a value as high as 25 for F particles in WS2016, whereas the
lowest values are found in DS2017. This is the same feature for the other
sites with ratios lower than 2 in DS2017. OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratios at the AWB site are
higher than at the traffic sites. Note that values at the AT site are higher
than CT values in the wet season, while lower in the dry season. Finally,
it is interesting to underline that linear correlations between EC and OC
are obtained in the ultrafine and fine modes in all campaigns, particularly
in DS2017 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8, 0.8, 0.9, and 0.9) at the ADF, AWB, AT,
and CT sites, respectively. This suggests that different studied sources can
be assessed as significant sources of both EC and OC.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e2803"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio for the different campaigns and sites for each
aerosol size (C in black, fine in light grey, ultrafine in grey). Each box
shows the median and the first and the third quartiles.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Water-soluble organic carbon</title>
      <p id="d1e2831">Concentrations of WSOC and WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios are presented in Table 2 for each
size (UF, F, C, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and campaign. As seen, WSOC values are always higher at
the ADF site than in other sites, at least by a factor of 12. Maximum values
are obtained in WS2016 with an average of 16.47, 17.08, and 79.68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for coarse, fine, and ultrafine fractions, respectively,
followed by WS2015 and DS2017. WSOC concentrations are the lowest in DS2016,
with an average of 4.14, 6.95, and 21.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for coarse,<?pagebreak page5334?> fine,
and ultrafine fractions, respectively. In terms of seasonality, there is not
a clear trend in WSOC values at the AWB and AT sites, whereas at the CT and
ADF sites, WSOC values are found to be respectively higher and lower in dry
seasons compared to wet seasons. It is also interesting to note that WSOC values
are maximal in UF sizes at the AT, ADF, and AWB sites. At the CT site, the
highest values are found in the coarse particulate fractions, except in
DS2016.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2894">WSOC concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios (%)
for each site, each campaign and each aerosol size.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center" colsep="1">Site  </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Abidjan waste burning </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center">Abidjan domestic fire </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Size</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">WSOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">WSOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wet season 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24,6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ultrafine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">43.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">51.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">72.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">69.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">47.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dry season 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ultrafine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">61.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wet season 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">42.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">44.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ultrafine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">79.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">84.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">106.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">52.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dry season 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">36.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">35.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ultrafine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">38.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">65.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center" colsep="1">Site </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Abidjan traffic </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center">Cotonou traffic </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Size</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">WSOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">WSOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wet season 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">39.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ultrafine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">29.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dry season 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">43.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">64.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">59.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ultrafine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">62.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">42.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">49.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wet season 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">34.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ultrafine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dry season 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">37.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ultrafine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page5335?><p id="d1e3793">As expected, WSOC is strongly correlated with OC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the ADF site, 0.8 at the AT site, and
0.5 at the AWB site, and 0.7 at the CT site), whereas correlations with EC are weaker,
especially at the AWB and CT sites with values ranging from 0.1 to 0.4,
respectively. Finally, when looking at WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios (Table 2), maximum
values are obtained at the ADF site with PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios as high as 43 %,
followed by the AT and AWB sites with 32 %. The lowest value (23 %) is
found at the CT site. Also, Table 2 shows that there is no clear seasonality
in WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC values, excepted at ADF where maximum values occur during the wet
season. Note, as for WSOC, that ratios are maximal in UF and F fractions for
all sites except at the CT site where the ratio for the coarse fraction is the
highest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Water-soluble ionic species</title>
      <?pagebreak page5336?><p id="d1e3840">Figure 11 shows the relative contribution of the major ions to the total
concentration (also given) of the ions in the different particle modes (C
and F) at the ADF, AWB, AT, and CT sites for the different measurement
campaigns. Let us recall here that only C and F fractions may be documented
due to the our experimental protocol. Total concentrations present maximum
values at ADF and CT sites. Values at the AWB and AT sites are of the same order
of magnitude and lower by a factor of 2 than at the ADF and CT sites. The
contribution of different ions shows significant variations from site to
site. The dominant ionic species at the ADF site over all campaigns is
chloride (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with a 26 % contribution, followed by nitrate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (16 %), calcium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (13 %), and potassium
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (12 %). Sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
sodium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and to a lesser extent magnesium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) contributions
are lower, ranging from 4 % to 7 % of the total ion species. The lowest
contribution is for organic acids with their total value lower than 5 %.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the major ionic component at the AWB and AT sites,
representing 24 % and 29 % of the total water-soluble inorganic
concentration, respectively. The second major contributor at the AWB and AT sites is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accounting for 21 % and 17 % of the ion mass,
respectively followed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (12 % and 15 %) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (15 % and 13 %). At the CT site, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is predominant with a relative
abundance of 24 %, followed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (23 %), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(19 %), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (13 %). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
contributions are lower and of the same order of magnitude at AT, AWB, and CT
sites, ranging from 4 % to 9 % of the total ion species. Note that organic
ion contributions at AT, CT, and AWB sites are of the same order as at the ADF site, with
lower values at the CT site. It is interesting to underline in Fig. 11 that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution is always higher in the coarse than in the fine
size. Conversely, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is always higher in the fine than in the coarse
size. In CT, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the fine fraction is as high as in the coarse
fraction, whereas at AT, AWB, and ADF sites <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coarse fraction is
predominant. Fine-particle contribution may be noticed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at ADF,
whereas at the other sites, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is most likely dominated by coarse
particles. Finally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mainly found in the fine mode at the
AT, AWB, and CT sites but in the coarse mode at the ADF site.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e4188">Water-soluble ionic species speciation for each site, each
campaign, and each aerosol size.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page5338?><p id="d1e4197">In terms of seasonal variations, it may be shown in Fig. 11 that higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are found in wet seasons than in the dry seasons everywhere,
except at the ADF site where there is no marked difference between seasons. For
example, the mean relative total percentages of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the CT site are
38 % and 24 % in WS2015 and WS2016, respectively, while these
percentages decrease significantly to 18 % and 13 % in DS2016 and
DS2017, respectively. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios are about 1.5 everywhere
in both seasons, in agreement with the typical seawater ratio (1–1.2) (Hara
et al., 2004), except at the ADF site where these ratios increase to 4 and 5
in the wet and dry season, respectively and at the AWB site in the dry season (2). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are always higher in the dry season than in the wet
season except for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ADF site where values are of the same order.
Finally, the same trend is observed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with higher values in dry than in wet seasons at AWB and CT sites, whereas values at ADF and AT sites are of the same order of magnitude for
the two seasons.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4313">Trace element concentrations for bulk aerosol for each site and for
DS2017 and WS2016.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.87}[.87]?><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col9" align="center">Bulk in nanograms per cubic meter (%) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Dry 2017  </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col9" align="center">Wet 2016 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ADF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AWB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">ADF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">AWB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">AT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">CT</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Al</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 050.8 (1.8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 186.1 (13.7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14 015.8 (12.26)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15 480.4 (5.7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1370.5 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1990.1 (3.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2191.4 (2.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4010.5 (4.4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8634.3 (1.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6093.7 (3.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3677.7 (3.22)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5068.9 (1.9)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1105.0 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">472.0 (0.8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">275.9 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1076.0 (1.2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Na</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6847.8 (1.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23 430.5 (12.8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 372.1 (13.44)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11 529.3 (4.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2070.6 (0.6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3735.4 (6.6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2861.5 (3.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5310.2 (5.8)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ca</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4321.2 (0.8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2923.7 (1.6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4117.6 (3.60)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6233.5 (2.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4124.7 (1.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">447.5 (0.8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">374.7 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4954.02 (5.4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1940.6 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">384.0 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">410.3 (0.36)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">823.2 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1524.7 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">294.9 (0.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">283.5 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">619.2 (0.7)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1709.9 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3807.9 (2.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1628.1 (1.42)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3406.8 (1.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1314.0 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">709.3 (1.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">987.3 (1.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1549.4 (1.7)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1521.9 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">696.0 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">147.8 (0.13)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">207.4 (0.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">605.4 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">81.4 (0.1)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ti</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">488.9 (0.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2270.3 (1.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">282.8 (0.25)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">457.9 (0.17)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">170.8 (0.05)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">75.7 (0.13)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">96.8 (0.11)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">154.7 (0.17)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">189.7 (0.03)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80.9 (0.04)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">57.9 (0.05)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">149.4 (0.06)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60.3 (0.02)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">41.1 (0.04)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">36.2 (0.04)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">172.1 (0.03)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">390.3 (0.21)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">217.9 (0.19)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">145.3 (0.05)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.4 (0.04)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">36.7 (0.04)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">31.2 (0.03)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">87.1 (0.02)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.0 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.3 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">79.7 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">38.4 (0.02)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.6 (0.02)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37.4 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.0006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.9 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">74.2 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">35.2 (0.02)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33.7 (0.03)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">160.6 (0.06)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">48.9 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.01 (0.02)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.1 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">41.41 (0.05)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">52.4 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.9 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">59.9 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">201.2 (0.11)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">123.6 (0.11)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">149.04 (0.06)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24.4 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.0006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ba</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">37.3 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.3 (0.03)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">47.4 (0.04)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">65.8 (0.02)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.02 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.9 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">32.0 (0.03)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ni</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36.5 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.5 (0.02)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.9 (0.02)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">50.2 (0.02)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.00)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">33.1 (0.06)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.7 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14.9 (0.02)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29.4 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.8 (0.03)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35.8 (0.03)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.6 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">41.9 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">47.7 (0.08)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">24.3 (0.03)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">29.7 (0.03)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28.1 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.5 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.2 (0.02)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34.02 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.1 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cu</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.3 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.8)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.9 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Li</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.5 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.8 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cd</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">V</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.4 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.84 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hf</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.8 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.8 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.97</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">As</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0 (0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Li</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.9 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Co</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.67 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ce</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.0 (0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">La</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nd</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0 (0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0,00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Be</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ga</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ge</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Se</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rh</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.0002</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Te</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0,00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0,00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Eu</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gd</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dy</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ho</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Er</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Yb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lu</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ta</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.08</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Th</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">U</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36 459.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65 817.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40 312.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">44 159.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12 562.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7874.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7227.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">18 001.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">558.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">183.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">114.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">270.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">374.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">56.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">91.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">91.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Trace element concentrations</title>
      <?pagebreak page5340?><p id="d1e6291">Table 3 shows the mean values of the major trace elements in bulk aerosol at
the different studied sites in WS2016 and DS2017, with their corresponding
relative abundances in the total aerosol mass into brackets. Let us recall
that data are not available in WS2015 and DS2016. The concentrations of
trace elements span a wide range, from 0.2 to 25.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Among
the measured elements, Al, K, Na, and Ca are the most abundant, followed by
Fe and Mg. In DS2017, Al and Na concentrations are higher at the AWB site than at the
other sites. The minimum value for these species is found at the ADF site.
Values in traffic sites are of the same order of magnitude and higher than
at the ADF site. The maximum of Ca and K values may be found at the CT and ADF sites,
respectively. It is interesting to note that Al, K, and Na concentrations are
higher in the dry season than in the wet season. Such a feature is less clear
for Ca, whose seasonal variability is less marked except at AWB and AT
sites. In terms of Mg, maximum values are observed at the ADF site and are of the
same order of magnitude whatever the season. Fe abundance is higher at AWB
and CT sites than at ADF and AT sites and higher in DS2017 than in WS2016
everywhere. The other metals (Ti, P, Zr, Zn, Cr, Mn, Pb, and Ni) represent
less than 0.5 % and 2 % of the total mass in WS2016 and DS2017,
respectively, at all sites, with Cr, Mn, Pb, and Ni exhibiting less seasonal
variability compared to the rest of the metal elements.</p>
      <p id="d1e6314">To assess the relative contribution of crustal and non-crustal origin of
elemental aerosol loadings, source enrichment factor (EF) values of a trace element
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> have been first calculated with the following formula using both
literature data of the typical elemental composition of the upper
continental crust (Mason and Moore, 1982; Taylor, 1964), measured elemental
composition from this study, and Al as a reference element as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M241" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and [Al]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the concentrations of the chemical
element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and Al in the atmosphere, respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
[Al]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the typical concentrations of the element X and Al in
the earth's crust, respectively. Al is frequently used as a reference
element, assuming that its anthropogenic sources in the atmosphere are
negligible (Gao et al., 2002; Cao et al., 2005; Xu et al., 2012). In all
sampling sites, EF values typically lower than 5 are obtained for several
trace elements (Be, Sc, Ti, V, Fe, Ga, Sr, Nb, Rh, Ba, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm,
Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Ta, Th, and U). This suggests a natural
origin of these species (Freitas et al., 2007; Gao et al., 2002). The most
enriched elements (EF &gt; 100) are Sb, Sn, Zn, Se, Te, Cd, Pb, Bi,
and Mo at nearly all of the sites, indicating significant anthropogenic
origin  (Wang et al., 2006). These elements are mainly emitted
into the atmosphere through fossil fuel combustion, traffic emission, wear
of brake lining materials, and industrial processes (Watson and Chow, 2001;
Samara and al., 2003). Secondly, source contributions have been estimated
from these EF values following the method described by Arditsoglou and
Samara (2005). Note that this study refers to ratios for a limited list of
sources, perhaps not including the African source specificities. As a
result, it may be seen that 30 % of trace element concentrations are of
anthropogenic origin at the ADF site, while they are about 17 % at the other sites.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e6430">Dust concentrations at the different study sites for each
campaign and for the different sizes (C in black, fine in light grey,
ultrafine in grey).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Dust</title>
      <p id="d1e6448">Figure 12 shows dust concentrations calculated from the Guinot et al. (2007)
methodology (see Sect. 2.3.6) for C and F particle sizes at the
different sites for each season. Note that as for WSI and trace elements and
due to our sampling procedure, there are values for fine and coarse
particles for all seasons except for WS2016 with values for coarse
particles only.</p>
      <p id="d1e6451">During the wet season, coarse dust concentrations range from 5 to 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2015 and 9 to 37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2016, with higher values
at the CT and ADF sites in 2015 and at AT, CT, and ADF sites in 2016. In WS2015,
fine dust concentrations range from 12 to 49 with maximum values at ADF and
CT sites also. During the dry season, values range from 38 to 156 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2016 and from 41 to 116 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017, with
maximum concentrations obtained at the CT site, followed by the AWB site. When
considering mean values of the dry seasons, total dust at the CT site is 2.4 times
the values found at AT, 1.6 times the value at AWB, and 3.4 times the value at ADF. Seasonal
comparison shows that total dust concentration is higher in the dry seasons
than in WS2015 by a factor of 3 at the AT site, 2.6 at the CT site, and 4 at the AWB site but of the
same order of magnitude at the ADF site.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e6537">Size-speciated aerosol chemical composition for each site, for
each campaign, and each aerosol size.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Aerosol chemical closure</title>
      <p id="d1e6554">The aerosol chemical closure obtained using the Guinot et al. (2007) method
(see below) at the different sites for each season is presented in Fig. 13. Results show clear intra- and interannual variations at all of the
sites, as well as significant differences among the sites. In total, dust
accounts for 39 %–75 % of the bulk PM mass at both traffic sites, with no
clear seasonal cycle and higher contributions in Cotonou<?pagebreak page5341?> (Fig. 13c and
d). These percentages vary from 32 % to 64 % at the AWB site and from 18 % to 35 % at the ADF site, with percentages 1.8 times higher in the dry
season than in the wet season at the AWB site and no clear seasonal difference at the ADF site
(Fig. 13a and b). Carbonaceous aerosol, the sum of EC, and POM show
large contributions at the ADF site (from 49 % to 69 % of the total PM
mass), with relatively similar proportions in each season (Fig. 13a). The
absence of a clear seasonal pattern is also observed at the CT site, whereas
carbonaceous aerosol is slightly higher in WS than in DS at the AWB site (23 % and
16 %, respectively) and at the AT site (37 % and 21 %, respectively) (Fig. 13b–d).
Carbonaceous aerosol contribution accounts for about 11 %–49 % of the total
mass at both traffic sites with higher values at the AT site (mean of 30 %) than at
the CT site (13 %). The ion percentages in PM fractions present the same pattern at
AT, CT, and AWB sites with higher values in wet than in dry seasons. In these
sites, we may notice that mass concentration in coarse particles is larger
in the wet season, while of the same order of magnitude as the one in
fine particles in the dry season. In the ADF site, no marked difference may be found
between the seasons and the sizes (Fig. 13).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e6566">A discussion of the results site by site (Abidjan domestic fire site,
traffic sites both together and waste burning site) will be first proposed.
We will scrutinize (1) the proximity between the sites and the sources, (2) the source specificity with more or less incomplete combustion (e.g., wood
combustion and two-wheel vehicle emission factors are higher than gasoline
emission factors; Keita et al., 2018), (3) the relative influence of other
local sources or transported sources on the studied sites such as dust and
biomass burning, (4) the occurrence of continental air masses, (5) the
variation in the boundary layer height (as reported by Colette et al.,
2007), and (6) the meteorological parameters (e.g., temperature, relative
humidity, and wet deposition) to explain the differences in pollutant
concentrations and their seasonal and interannual variabilities.</p>
      <p id="d1e6569">In a second part, we will present comparison of our values with other
DACCIWA values and also with literature values for other intensive campaigns
in Africa.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Abidjan domestic fires (ADF)</title>
      <?pagebreak page5342?><p id="d1e6579">As shown in the above paragraphs, maximum values are obtained at the ADF
site for aerosol mass, EC, OC, WSOC, water-soluble ionic species (e.g.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and some trace elements
such as Mg and K (whereas Al, Na, and Fe are lower than in the other sites).
Also, aerosol PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are well above the annual and daily WHO
guidelines of 25 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, whatever the season.</p>
      <p id="d1e6661">Such a pattern is due to the proximity of the ADF site to the studied
combustion source; in that area, the use of wood combustion is very active
due to commercial activities of women drying fish and meat and domestic
cooking. This is also confirmed by the high relative importance of total
carbon in aerosol mass whatever the size (49 %–69 %) and by values of the
source enrichment factor. Indeed, at least 30 % of trace element
concentrations are of anthropogenic origin at the ADF site. In addition, wood
combustion is well known to be highly polluting due to incomplete
combustion; this is shown here by the measurements of very high OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratios
at ADF, on the order of the one measured at the source level by Keita et al. (2018). This is also shown by WSOC relative importance, which is expected for
wood burning following Yu et al. (2020), Tang et al. (2016), Feng (2006), and
Saxena and Hildemann (1996), and by the strong correlation of WSOC with
biomass burning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer.</p>
      <p id="d1e6682">Chloride is most likely associated with the sea salt origin (normal chloride
concentrations represent at least 55 % of marine aerosols following
Goldberg, 1963) or secondary aerosol production  (Li et al.,
2016). Since chloride relative concentration at the ADF site remains lower
than the that of sea salt aerosols, the secondary production source would be
the better explanation for high chloride concentrations observed at ADF. The
size distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
support this conclusion; the predominance of these elements in fine-particle mode at the ADF site would be associated with anthropogenic
emissions, particularly biomass combustion and domestic fires, or with
secondary inorganic aerosol origin. This is confirmed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio values as shown earlier. Contrarily, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
contributions to the total ions at the ADF site peak mainly in the large
particle fraction and may be attributed to quasi-natural origin, primarily
to dust emissions and nitrate formation by reaction processes, respectively.
In addition, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> display similar size distributions at
the ADF site, with the major contribution in the coarse particle fraction,
suggesting the common sea salt origin of these two elements (Belis et al.,
2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e6807">As we have shown above, the lower proportion of metal elements at the ADF
site (6.5 % of the bulk concentration) can be explained by the less
dominant influence of resuspended dust particles compared to traffic
sources. Elements such as Cr, Mn, Pb, and Ni have less seasonal variability
than other metallic elements. These small proportions of these non-crust
elements suggest a low contribution of elements emitted mainly by
anthropogenic activities such as industrial processes (Viana et al., 2007, 2008; Minguillón et al., 2014). Finally, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zn</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio has been
also examined. A value of 29 close to ratio reported for gasoline vehicle
(27, Qin et al., 1997) is obtained for the ADF site, indicating that this
site is also impacted by traffic sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e6823">High values of WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios are expected to be harmful to health (Ramgolam
et al., 2009; Val et al., 2013). This effect is being enhanced by the
particulate size measured at this site (Kim et al., 2003; Wilson et al.,
2002). Indeed, the relative mass distribution of PM and OC particle sizes
shows a major contribution of particles less than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m (as high as
85 % of PM). This could be due to the fact that carbonaceous aerosols are
formed near emission sources and are mainly of submicron size (Boucher,
2012). Nevertheless, note that EC also presents a large coarse-particle
contribution. This could be due to the importance of wood burning at this
site with less efficient combustion and large particle emissions (Watson et
al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e6841">In terms of seasonality, higher concentrations of aerosol mass, OC, WSOC, EC,
and total water-soluble ionic species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are observed in WS2015 and WS2016 than in DS2016. This may
be explained by a more incomplete combustion in the wet seasons than in
DS2016 due to the use of moist wood for cooking and smoking fish, which
leads to large amount of smoke and higher particulate emission factor
values. Note that DS2017 values are as important as the ones of wet seasons,
which will be explained later in the text. With regard to WSOC, their
variabilities may be also linked to meteorological factors, such as solar
radiation (Tang et al., 2016; Favez et al., 2008) and relative humidity
(Liang et al., 2016). At the ADF site, temperatures are roughly similar in both
seasons. However, RH variability may play a role since it is higher in the wet
season than in the dry season. Finally, our results indicate no clear seasonal
cycle for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which confirms its anthropogenic origin, as previously
shown.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Traffic sites (Abidjan traffic and Cotonou traffic sites)</title>
      <p id="d1e6905">Let us recall first that the two traffic sites have been chosen since they
are representative of the traffic diversity in West Africa. At the CT site, both
personal cars, taxis, and an important two-wheel fleet may be found, whereas
at the AT site, there are buses, taxis, and personal cars. Also, the distance
between the site and the traffic sources is the same for the two traffic
sites, slightly larger than the distance between the site and the wood
burning sources at the ADF site.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e6910">MODIS Aerosol optical depth regional distribution over West
Africa. Data are for 2017, focusing on our campaign date at Abidjan (<bold>a–c</bold>
11–12 January, left part) and Cotonou (<bold>b–d</bold> 6–7 January, right part).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/5327/2020/acp-20-5327-2020-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6925">In these two sites, concentrations are high with PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  values well
above the WHO guidelines. Average aerosol mass, EC, OC, dust, and water-soluble ionic concentrations (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maximal at
AT and CT sites, respectively) are higher at the CT than at the AT site by a factor
of 1.5 to 2. Note that this poor air quality found in Cotonou has been
reported by Cachon et al. (2014). The higher values found in Cotonou could
be due to more intense traffic in Cotonou than in Abidjan. Also in Cotonou,
this traffic is associated with the lack of public transportation and the
use of highly polluted<?pagebreak page5343?> mopeds (aged over 15 years) (Gounougbe, 1999; Avogbe
et al., 2011), despite the effort in the last 10 years to restrict their
use. Several studies such as MMEH (2002) have shown that more than 94 000
mopeds and 350 000 secondhand vehicles are in circulation in Cotonou. Other
factors contributing to the local pollution include outdoor restaurants
using charcoal and motorcycle garages, which are more present around the
Cotonou traffic site compared to the Abidjan site. It also includes
anthropogenic dust. Indeed, at Cotonou, the lack of road infrastructure
favors the resuspension of dust particles. Finally, other sources may
potentially influence aerosol seasonal composition in these two sites,
including marine aerosols, transported dust and biomass burning particles, and  anthropogenic aerosols from the surrounding countries (Fig. 5).
Note also that source enrichment factor values show that about 17 % of
trace element concentrations are of anthropogenic origin at both traffic
sites and that the relative importance of total carbon in mass is higher at the
AT than at the CT site.</p>
      <p id="d1e6965">Aerosol mass, composition, and size depend on the season, and the two traffic
sites are differently affected. The EC and OC concentrations measured in
both traffic sites and averaged per season are higher in dry than in wet
season. Such variations may be explained by several factors: particulate wet
deposition occurring during the wet season, reduction in traffic flow due to
school vacations, and meteorological<?pagebreak page5344?> influence. Higher EC and OC
concentrations are obtained at the CT rather than at the AT site in dry seasons, whereas no
statistical difference may been found between the two sites in wet seasons.
Such a result is mainly explained by Fig. 5. In wet seasons, similar a
back-trajectory pattern may be observed for both sites, whereas in dry
seasons, the CT traffic site only would be influenced by Nigerian anthropogenic
sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e6968">In terms of WSOC concentrations, concentrations at the AT site are on
average higher than those recorded at the CT site in the wet season but
lower in the dry season. The presence of dust can produce semivolatile organic
gas scavenging and therefore WSOC and OC enhancement. Such a phenomenon can
explain the highest WSOC concentrations observed in the dry season at the CT
site where dust concentrations are highest (see dust paragraph). Moreover,
this can also explain why the maximum WSOC values are in coarse particles at the CT site, while at the AT site maximum values are in ultrafine particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e6971">Total WSI concentrations are larger at the AT site in the wet than in the dry
season with higher values in coarse particles. At the CT site, total WSI
concentrations in fine particles are higher in the dry than in the wet
season, whereas the same values are obtained in coarse particles for both
seasons. Note that CT values are generally higher than AT values with a more
important contribution of fine particles in the dry season. These WSI
variations can be explained by the relative importance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at both sites.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e7020">Comparison of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations with literature data. Only
literature data given at a daily scale have been selected.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">142</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">This work</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cotonou, Benin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">154</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">This work</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">81.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Xie et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Christchurch, New Zealand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tunno et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pune, India</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Pipal et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Delhi, India</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">123</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Guttikunda and Calori (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lahore, Pakistan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Colbeck et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ahvaz, Iran</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Shahsavani et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hong Chong, Hong Kong</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Cheng et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lecce, Italy</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Cesari et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Libreville, Gabon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ngo et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Port-Gentille, Gabon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ngo et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kenitra, Morocco</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">51.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Zghaid et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bilecik, Turkey</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">247</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Gaga et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Algiers, Algeria</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Bouhila et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shobra, Egypt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">216</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lowenthal et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d1e7307">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–EC and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–OC comparison with Djossou et al. (2018) and Xu
et al. (2019) values. Units are in micrograms of carbon per cubic meter  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> OC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> EC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">References</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Traffic Abidjan.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">This Work</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cote d'Ivoire</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Jan 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">16.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">18.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Djossou et al. 2018</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Traffic Cotonou.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">This Work</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Benin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Jan 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">33.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">27.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Djossou et al. 2018</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Jan 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">14.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Xu et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Domestic fire</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">147.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">This Work</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abidjan.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">56.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 51.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cote d'Ivoire</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">172.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Jan 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">283.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">37.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Djossou et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">76.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">68.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Jan 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">66.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">21.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">72.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Xu et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"> 189.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 197.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Waste burning</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">This Work</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abidjan.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cote d'Ivoire</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Jan 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">21.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">19.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Djossou et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Jan 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">22.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"> 85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Xu et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jul 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 65.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e8574">First, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution to total WSI is higher at the CT site than at the AT site, with no clear seasonal variation at the CT site and higher values in the dry
season than in the wet season at the AT site. Also at the CT site, fine, and coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
particles are in the same range, whereas coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles are
predominant at the AT site. Such a feature may be explained by the impact of dust
sources including long-range dust transport at Abidjan and a combination of
long-range dust transport and road resuspension at Cotonou.</p>
      <p id="d1e8619">Second, the relative contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a percentage of total WSI in the different particle modes
is reduced in the wet season. During the wet season, the clean winds
surrounding the ocean before reaching the measurement sites could contribute
to lower the proportion of these species, in addition to the scavenging
processes during the rainy days. Unlike the wet season, a relatively good
correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.87 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
0.73 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and 0.87 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) has been found in coarse particles, indicating similar
sources for these three species during the dry season. In order to try to
identify these sources, the ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been determined. The average
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios in combined coarse
particles (1.07 and 2.58 during the wet season and 0.33 and 1.60 during the
dry season) are higher than the corresponding ratios for typical soil (0.026
and 0.003, respectively). On the other hand, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio increases in the fine particles (5.07 during the wet season and 2.53
during the dry season), while that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains
almost constant (2.86 during the wet season and 1.65 during the dry season).
This implies that the atmosphere at AT and CT sites is enriched by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formed as anthropogenic secondary particles, possibly from
sulfur-containing pollution sources (Seinfield and Pandis, 1998),
particularly in fine-particle mode, and by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mostly coming
from nitrogen-containing sources in all particle sizes. The higher
contributions of these elements during the dry season could result from a
combination of several factors: (1) an atmosphere loaded with dust favoring
heterogeneous chemistry to obtain secondary aerosol and the rise of biomass
burning emissions; (2) the increase in photochemical activity and higher
concentrations of hydroxyl radicals in the dry season, which can oxidize
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from combustion (Arndt et al., 1997) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Li et al.,
2014); and (3) the wind transport of anthropogenic secondary particles from
the industrial zone located upstream from our sites. Finally, the proportion
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the total mass of ions is highest for coarse
particles at both traffic sites especially during the wet season, suggesting
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at AT and CT sites has a natural origin and is probably from
sea salt emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e8985">If we focus now on dust during the two wet seasons, concentrations are
higher in 2016 than in 2015 at CT and AT sites for coarse particles (no data
of fine particles are available in WS2016). This is consistent with observed
aerosol optical depth (AOD) values at the CT site, which increased by a factor of 2
between 2015 and 2016. No AOD value is given by Léon et al. (2019) at
Abidjan in WS2015 to allow such a comparison in Abidjan. Moreover, during the
wet season, an Angström coefficient (AE) on the order of 1 has been
found at the CT site, indicating smaller particles that could be due to road
resuspension. It is interesting to note that during WS2016, AOD and AE are,
respectively, higher and lower at Abidjan than at Cotonou. Again, this is
consistent with our dust concentrations at the CT site. In Abidjan, we could
assume that another source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is not taken into account in
our dust calculations, may explain our dust concentration data. That may be
the result of anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from residential combustion,
more important in 2016 than in 2015 as shown earlier (<uri>http://naei.beis.gov.uk/overview/pollutants?pollutant_id=84</uri>, last access: 3- December 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e9019">The relative contribution of dust generally peaks in the coarse mode and, to
a lesser extent, in the fine mode, reflecting a natural origin. It is
interesting to note that the dust contribution observed in this study for
the year 2016 at the Abidjan site is in agreement with the results of Xu et
al. (2019) which show a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dust contribution of 35 %–50 % compared
to our values of 18 %–52 %.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page5345?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Abidjan waste burning site</title>
      <p id="d1e9040">Concentrations measured at the AWB site are slightly lower than values found in
the other sites. This can be explained by the larger distance of the site to
the main studied source (here waste burning source) than in the other sites.
However, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are also higher than WHO guidelines.</p>
      <p id="d1e9052">Aerosol mass, EC, and OC concentrations are higher in the dry than in the wet season,
which suggests less waste burning activities during the wet season or
impacts of other local anthropogenic sources or long-range biomass burning
sources. The highest values are found in DS2017 with the lowest OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratio, as
at the AT site. The OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratio is highly variable at the AWB site (1–10), which confirms that the
AWB site may be impacted by different types of sources as well as by
secondary aerosol organic formation which can be detected for OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC higher
than 2 (Turpin et al., 1990; Hildemann et al., 1991; Chow et al., 1996). Note
that OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC typical for the waste burning source is on the order of 8 (Keita et
al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e9083">It is also observed at the AWB site that PM mass concentrations are mainly
distributed in C mode (30 %–44 %) over the entire period of study, excepted
during WS2015, and to a lesser extent in F mode (21 %–44 %). EC and OC
are mainly distributed in C and UF modes. Water-soluble fraction of
organic carbon is important (32 %) and on the order of the one found at the AT site. Same for WSI concentrations and WSI composition. At the AWB site, WSI values
are globally slightly higher in the wet than in the dry season. However, it is
interesting to underline that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is much higher in the dry season than in the
wet season, especially in DS2017. This is in agreement with dust
concentrations and trace element concentrations, which have been found to be
maximal at the AWB site, reaching 35.8 % of the total PM mass in the dry season.
These maximum percentages are due to the large contribution of both Al and
Na crustal elements, which account for about 26 %. Also note a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
0.08 in DS2017, which indicates an influence of resuspended particles. A
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zn</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 56 is obtained for the AWB site, which is in close agreement
with values reported for oil burning (Watson et al., 2001; Samara et al.,
2003). That could indicate that oil might be one of the waste burning
materials.</p>
      <p id="d1e9124">Our result suggests that AWB aerosol mass is influenced by a mix of sources,
including fuel combustion and mineral salt from sources around the
measurement site, associated with the long-range source impact of dust and biomass
burning, which will be further discussed in the next paragraph.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Interannual variability in aerosols in Abidjan and Cotonou</title>
      <p id="d1e9135">EC and OC concentrations are generally higher in DS2017 than in DS2016 for
all of the sites. This is not due to the meteorological condition, which is
similar in both years. This is also not due to biomass burning impacts.
Indeed, when looking at MODIS burned areas for our period of study
(<uri>http://www.aeris-data.fr/redirect/MODIS-MCD64A1</uri>, last access: 4 March 2019), burned areas of West
African savannas are higher in 2016 than in 2017. Therefore, carbonaceous
aerosol concentrations should be higher in 2016. Then, this could be due to
a counter effect between biomass burning emission strength and air mass
transport efficiency. As a result, biomass burning impact could not explain
the difference in EC and OC during the dry season between 2016 and 2017.
Rather, this is due to the variability in local sources. In DS2016 in
Abidjan, there was a general strike of civil servants of the State with
important consequences on urban activities. Lower activities were observed
(lower<?pagebreak page5346?> fish smoking emissions, lower traffic, etc.) in DS2016 compared to
DS2017, thus explaining the lower EC and OC concentrations at Abidjan sites.
In Cotonou, highest carbonaceous aerosol values in DS2017 may be explained
by back-trajectory patterns; Cotonou would be impacted by air masses coming
from the highly polluted Lagos (Nigeria) area in that period, while from less
polluted northern areas in DS2016. Such an assumption is validated by the
AOD values at 550nm from MODIS satellite images (<uri>http://www.aeris-data.fr/redirect/MODIS-MCD64A1</uri>, last access: 6 February 2019), which show very high
particulate concentrations in the Gulf of Guinea (Fig. 14).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Table 6</label><caption><p id="d1e9147">EC and OC comparison with literature values. Only literature data
given at a daily scale have been selected.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abidjan (Côte d'Ivoire)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cotonou (Benin)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bilecik (Turkey)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">49.6–62.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">38.8–58.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Gaga et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pune (India)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Pipal et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shanghai (China)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.9–13.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.9–5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ding et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lahore (Pakistan)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">85.7–152</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.8–21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Stone et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Agra (India)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25.4–70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.3–9.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Satsangi et al. (2012), Pipal et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Delhi (India)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34.1–50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.3–10.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bisht et al. (2015a), Pipal et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ahmedabad (India)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Rengarajan et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Yokohama (Japan)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Khan et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing (China)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.9–28.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.2–16.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Guinot et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Table 7</label><caption><p id="d1e9394">Comparison of WSOC concentrations with literature data. Only
literature data given at a daily scale have been selected.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WSOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2–8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">This work</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cotonou, Benin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2–8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">This work</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9–27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Yu et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4–6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Xiang et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8–12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tang et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Du et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6–8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Feng et al. (2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shanghai, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2–7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Feng et al. (2006), Huang et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Guangzhou, Hong Kong</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Huang et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Guangzhou, Hong Kong</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5–10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Feng et al. (2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gwangju, South Korea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2–3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Park et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tokyo, Japan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3–23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sempere and Kawamura (1994)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cairo, Egypt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Favez et al. (2008)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Amsterdam, the Netherlands</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1–2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Feng et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Barcelona, Spain</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1–2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Viana et al. (2007, 2008)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Brindisi, Italy</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Genga et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne, France</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1–5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sullivan et al. (2004), Jaffrezo et al. (2005a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e9653">This figure also shows the AOD difference between Cotonou and Abidjan for
DS2017, with higher values at Cotonou than in Abidjan for the campaign
period, in agreement with our measurements of aerosol mass, EC, OC, and<?pagebreak page5347?> dust.
This is confirmed by the DACCIWA sun photometer AOD and Angström
coefficient (AE) measurements at Abidjan and Cotonou (Léon et al., 2019;
Djossou et al., 2018). Indeed, in DS2017, during our period of measurements,
mean AOD in Cotonou is on the order of 1.3 versus 0.9 in Abidjan for an AE
of 0.6 for both sites, which clearly indicates the presence of coarse dust
particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e9656">Finally, aerosol mass and dust concentrations have been seen to be higher in
DS2016 than in DS2017 in Abidjan, whereas values are of the same order of
magnitude at Cotonou. Such high values at Abidjan in DS2016 can be explained
by the back-trajectory pattern, with air masses all coming from northern
dusty areas in DS2016 (Bodélé depression in Tchad, Prospero et al., 2002; Washington et al., 2003; Knippertz et al., 2011; Balarabe et al.,
2016) and/or from northern dusty countries (Mali, Niger) (Ozer, 2005),
whereas in DS2017, contribution of southern marine clean air masses may also
be noted.</p>
      <p id="d1e9659">In the wet season, aerosol mass, EC, and OC are higher in WS2015 than in
WS2016. This may be due to particulate wet deposition, more efficient in
WS2016, which has been seen earlier to be more rainy (4.7 mm) than in WS2015
(2 mm). Moreover, at the AT site, dust concentrations are higher for coarse
particles in WS2016 than in WS2015. Such variations may be explained by
long-range dust sources and/or road dust resuspension processes. As no dust
event has been noticed, local source explanation seems to be more evident.</p>
      <p id="d1e9662">In AT, CT, and AWB sites, OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratios are globally on the same order for WS2015,
WS2016, and DS2016, with values lower than for DS2017. This could be due to
lower traffic activities linked to the DS2016 strike and the wet season
vacation periods. Indeed, much higher OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratios measured in DS2017 are
typical of those of diesel vehicles (Mmari et al., 2013; Keita et al.,
2018). Finally, it is interesting to note that OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratios measured in this
study are in the range of those previously reported for other<?pagebreak page5348?> megacities
such as Agra in India with 6.7 (Pachauri et al., 2013), Helsinki in Finland
with 2.7 (Viidanoja, 2002), Cairo in Egypt with 2.9 (Favez, 2008), Paris in
France with 3.5 (Favez, 2008), and Milan in Italy with 6.6 (Lonati et al.,
2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Comparison with literature data</title>
      <p id="d1e9694">Firstly, the comparison between our data and other DACCIWA results including
other time sampling focuses on PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels,  since these particle
sizes are relevant for health impact studies
(Xing et al., 2016). In addition to our values,
Fig. 7 presents data from Xu et al. (2019) using personal samplers
collected in the same area and on the same dates in 2016 during 12 h on women
at the ADF site, students at the AWB site, and drivers at the CT site and
from the Djossou et al. (2018) study based on filters exposed for 1 week and collected
at the same areas and for the same periods as this study. We note that
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  values directly measured on women are 2.3 and 0.9 times our values
obtained at the ADF site in dry and wet seasons, respectively, and 3.4 and
4.9 times higher on students than at the AWB site and 1.6 and 2.1 times
higher on drivers than at the CT site. Also, our values are on average 1.6,
3, 5, and 8 times higher than weekly integrated values of Djossou et al. (2018) including our 3 days of measurements at the AWB, ADF, AT, and CT sites,
respectively. As it may be seen, the lowest concentrations are observed in
Djossou et al. (2018), whereas the highest concentrations are recorded in
Xu et al. (2019). This is valid for all sites, seasons, and campaigns.
Differences between our values and Djossou values may be explained by the
sampling times of the two studies. Indeed, as recalled, Djossou measurements
are weekly integrated, taking into account diurnal activities during all of the
week, including weekend and nights, which have expected lower PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  concentrations. Our study includes only maximum pollution conditions for
each site. The highest differences occur for the traffic sites. This may be
clearly understood since diurnal and weekly variations in traffic sources
are the most variable. Comparison between our values and Xu et al. (2019)
values is also interesting. Indeed, it is at the ADF site that on-site and
on-women PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are the closest, which shows that this site is
the most representative of the pollution exposure to women. The biggest
differences are found at the AWB site. As already mentioned, distance from
the site to the waste burning source is more important than for other sites,
which explains why concentrations obtained on students who are living close
to the sources are much higher than on-site concentrations. At the Cotonou
traffic site, measurements taken from people are also higher than on-site
measurements. Such differences can be explained by additional pollution
exposure as people move around. Note that the sampling technique may also
play a role in such a comparison. In terms of seasonal variation, our
results are in agreement with long-term EC measurements obtained by Djossou
et al. (2018) for the same sites and period. Finally, Table 4 compares our
mean PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  results obtained from 3 h sampling for 3 consecutive days to literature data for different traffic sites in the world
given at a daily scale. It is interesting to note that our values are
situated at the higher end of the range of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  data observed from
the other sites.</p>
      <p id="d1e9752">Secondly, Table 5 compares our OC and EC values to those obtained by Djossou
et al. (2018) and Xu et al. (2019) as previously described for the same
period and the same sites. Again, it is interesting to note that Djossou's
values are in general lower than ours. Indeed, for the wet and dry seasons,
our OC measurements are 4 and 1.4 times higher than Djoussou's at the AT
site, 2.1 and 5.7 times higher at the CT site, and 2.5 and 2.5 times higher
at the ADF site, respectively. As for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, this can be explained by the
different sampling times between our experiments that were performed at the
peak of urban activities, while Djossou's dataset represents weekly
integrated values. Differences at the ADF site are largely explained by the
temporal pattern of fish smoking activities which take place every day, only
in the morning; as such the associated pollution is not well represented in
the weekly sampling. Finally, there are less differences at the AWB site
between both datasets. As explained above, there are no marked temporal
variations of concentrations at the AWB site. The predominant waste burning
emissions impacting our site can occur night and day on weekdays and weekends
since the origin of such burning can be either anthropogenic or from spontaneous
combustion. It may be also recalled that another reason for agreement between
both datasets may come from the large distance between the site and the
local and regional sources. Comparisons made between our values and those of
Xu's personal data show that both OC and EC are of the same order at the ADF
site, whereas Xu values are higher than ours at the CT and AWB sites. This
result is in agreement with what we found with PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  concentrations
as detailed above. Finally, Table 6 presents OC and EC for the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  comparison between our values and other recent studies dealing with
traffic sites in other regions of the world and with similar operational
conditions. We find that our values are situated in the middle of the range
observed in these different studies. Briefly, as presented in Table 7, it is
interesting to compare our WSOC concentrations to literature data for
different traffic sites of the world. We note that our values are on the
same order as values found in Asia and higher than those found in Europe.</p>
      <p id="d1e9782">Thirdly, the percentages of the total WSI to PM mass (15 %–20 %) at the
three Abidjan sites (ADF, AWB, and AT) are of the same order of magnitude
as the data from PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  personal exposure samples collected at the
same locations in 2016 by Xu et al. (2019). Our results also are very close
to the ionic contribution of 9 % of the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  mass found at the
urban curbside site in Dar es Salaam in Tanzania during the wet season 2005
by Mkoma (2008).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page5349?><sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e9813">This paper presents the mass and the size-speciated chemical composition of
particulate matter (PM) obtained during the dry and wet seasons in 2015,
2016,  and 2017. During each campaign, 3 h sampling at the peak period of
pollution for 3 consecutive days was performed at three sites in
Abidjan, representative of domestic fire (ADF), waste burning (AWB), and
traffic (AT) sources, and at one traffic site in Cotonou (CT).</p>
      <p id="d1e9816">It is important to underline that our results and their temporal variations
are very sensitive to (1) the source activities whose pollution levels are
highly linked to socioeconomic status of each city; (2) the impact of
imported pollution (sea salt, biomass burning, dust, anthropogenic emissions
from neighboring countries), according to air mass origins; and (3) the
particle wet deposition.</p>
      <p id="d1e9819">The comparison between our results and other DACCIWA measurements underlines
the importance of the distance of the chosen site to the sources. At the
source level (such as ADF), pollution results at the site are in agreement
with exposure of people living at this site. However, at the other sites,
comparison is more difficult since the sites are under the influence of a
mix of transported sources. That shows the key importance of exposure
studies to estimate air quality and health impacts. That shows also the need
for long-term studies to really understand role of imported sources in urban
air quality.</p>
      <p id="d1e9822">The main striking feature is that PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  values are well above the
annual and daily WHO guidelines of 25 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,
whatever the site and the season. Also, measured concentrations from this
study are situated in the middle to the high part of the range of worldwide
urban aerosol concentrations given at a daily scale. In addition, we have
stressed the importance of ultrafine and fine particles in the studied
aerosol and of species such as particulate organic matter and water-soluble
organic carbon, which are well known to be particularly harmful. This is
again a warning signal for pollution levels in African capitals if nothing
is done to reduce emissions in the future.</p>
      <p id="d1e9855">Our study constitutes an original database to characterize urban air
pollution from specific African combustion sources. The next step will be to
cross such an exhaustive aerosol chemical characterization with biological
data in order to evaluate the impact of aerosol size and chemical
composition on aerosol inflammatory properties.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e9862">The pollution data used in this study are original and are publicly available in the Supplement <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1-2020-supplement" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1-2020-supplement</ext-link>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e9871">AJA and CL conceived and designed the study. AJA, CL, and ETD
contributed to the literature search, data analysis/interpretation, and
paper writing. AJA, CL, ABS, and ETD contributed to paper
revision. AJA, CL, JFL, HC, VY, ABA, CGL, CZ, EG, and SK carried
out the particulate samples collection and chemical experiments and analyzed
the experimental data.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e9877">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e9883">This article is part of the special issue “Results of the project `Dynamics-aerosol-chemistry-cloud interactions in West Africa' (DACCIWA) (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e9889">The research leading to these results was made available thanks to the collaboration of the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Commission (FP7/2007–2013) in the framework of the European project DACCIWA. The authors would like to express their gratitude.
The authors would also like greatly to thank all colleagues and operators who contributed to the sampling during the different campaigns.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e9894">This research has been supported by the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement no. 603502 (EU project DACCIWA: Dynamics-aerosol-chemistry-cloud interactions in West Africa).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e9900">This paper was edited by Mathew Evans and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Adon, M., Galy-Lacaux, C., Yoboué, V., Delon, C., Lacaux, J. P.,
Castera, P., Gardrat, E., Pienaar, J., Al Ourabi, H., Laouali, D., Diop, B.,
Sigha-Nkamdjou, L., Akpo, A., Tathy, J. P., Lavenu, F., and Mougin, E.: Long
term measurements of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ammonia, nitric acid
and ozone in Africa using passive samplers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
7467–7487, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7467-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7467-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Castillo, S., Escudero, M., Avila, A., Cuevas, E.,
Torres, C., Romero, P., Exposito, F., and Garcia, O.: Characterisation of TSP
and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at Izaña and Sta, Cruz de Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain)
during a Saharan Dust Episode (July 2002), Atmos. Environ., 39,
4715–4728, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.018</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arditsoglou, A. and Samara, C.: Levels of total suspended particulate matter
and major trace elements in Kosovo: a source identification and
apportionment study, Chemosphere, 59, 669–678, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.056</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arndt, R. L., Carmichael, G. R., Streets, D. G., and Bhatti, N.: Sulfur
dioxide emissions and sectorial contributions to sulfur deposition in Asia,
Atmos. Environ., 31, 1553–1572, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00236-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00236-1</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Avogbe, P. H., Ayi-Fanou, L., Cachon, B., Chabi, N., Debende, A., Dewaele,
D., Aissi, F., Cazier, F., and Sanni, A.: Hematological changes among
Beninese motor-bike taxi drivers exposed to benzene by urban air pollution,
Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 5, 464–472,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Balarabe, M., Abdullah, K., and Nawawi, M.: Seasonal Variations of Aerosol
Optical Properties and Identification of Different Aerosol Types Based on
AERONET Data over Sub-Sahara West-Africa, Atmos. Clim. Sci., 6, 13–28,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2016.61002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4236/acs.2016.61002</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Belis, C. A., Karagulian, F., Larsen, B. R., and Hopke, P. K.: Critical
review and meta-analysis of ambient particulate matter source apportionment
using receptor models in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 69, 94–108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.009</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bisht, D. S., Dumka, U. C., Kaskaoutis, D. G., Pipal, A. S., Srivastava, A. K.,
Soni, V. K., Attri, S. D., Sateesh, M., and Tiwari, S.: Carbonaceous aerosols and
pollutants over Delhi urban environment: Temporal evolution, source
apportionment and radiative forcing, Sci. Total Environ.,
521/522, 431–445, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O.: Aérosols atmosphériques Propriétés et impacts climatiques, Springer Paris,  2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bouhila, Z., Mouzai, M., Azli, T., Nedjar, A., Mazouzi, C., Zergoug, Z.,
Boukhadra, D., Chegrouche, S., and Lounici, H.: Investigation of aerosol
trace element concentrations nearby Algiers for environmental monitoring
using instrumental neutron activation analysis, Atmos. Res., 166,
49–59, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.06.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.06.013</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cachier, H., Brémond, M.-P., and Buat-Ménard, P.: Carbonaceous
aerosols from different tropical biomass burning sources, Nature, 340,
371–373, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/340371a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/340371a0</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cachon, B. F., Firmin, S., Verdin, A., Ayi-Fanou, L., Billet, S., Cazier,
F., Martin, P. J., Aissi, F., Courcot, D., Sanni, A., and Shirali, P.:
Proinflammatory effects and oxidative stress within human bronchial
epithelial cells exposed to atmospheric particulate matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) collected from Cotonou, Benin, Environ. Pollut., 185,
340–351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.026</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Zhang, X. Y., Chow, J. C., An, Z. S., Ho, K. F., Watson,
J. G., Fung, K., Wang, Y. Q., and Shen, Z. X.: Characterization of airborne
carbonate over a site near Asian dust source regions during spring 2002 and
its climatic and environmental significance, J. Geophys. Res., 110,
D03203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005244" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005244</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cassee, F. R., Héroux, M.-E., Gerlofs-Nijland, M. E., and Kelly, F. J.:
Particulate matter beyond mass: recent health evidence on the role of
fractions, chemical constituents and sources of emission, Inhal.
Toxicol., 25, 802–812, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2013.850127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3109/08958378.2013.850127</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Celo, V., Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E., Mathieu, D., and Okonskaia, I.: Validation of
simple microwave-assisted acid digestion method using microvessels for
analysis of trace elements in atmospheric PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  in monitoring and
fingerprinting studies,   Open Chem. Biomed. Method. J.,
3, 141–150, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cesari, D., Donateo, A., Conte, M., Merico, E., Giangreco, A., Giangreco, F.,
and Contini, D.: An inter-comparison of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at urban and urban
background sites: Chemical characterization and source apportionment,
Atmos. Res., 174/175, 106–119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.004</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cheng, Z., Jiang, J., Chen, C., Gao, J., Wang, S., Watson, J. G., Wang, H.,
Deng, J., Wang, B., Zhou, M., Chow, J. C., Pitchford, M. L., and Hao, J.:
Estimation of Aerosol Mass Scattering Efficiencies under High Mass Loading:
Case Study for the Megacity of Shanghai, China, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
49, 831–838, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es504567q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es504567q</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chiapello, I., Bergametti, G., Chatenet, B., Bousquet, P., Dulac, F., and
Soares, E. S.: Origins of African dust transported over the northeastern
tropical Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 13701–13709, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00259" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD00259</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Lu, Z., Lowenthal, D. H., Frazier, C. A.,
Solomon, P. A., Thuillier, R. H., and Magliano, K.: Descriptive analysis of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at regionally representative locations during
SJVAQS/AUSPEX, Atmos. Environ., 30, 2079–2112,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00402-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1352-2310(95)00402-5</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Colbeck, I., Nasir, Z. A., Ahmad, S., and Ali, Z.: Exposure to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
PM1 and Carbon Monoxide on Roads in Lahore, Pakistan, Aerosol Air Qual.
Res., 11, 689–695, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2010.10.0087" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2010.10.0087</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Colette, A., Menut, L., Haeffelin, M., and Morille, Y.: Impact of the
transport of aerosols from the free troposphere towards the boundary layer
on the air quality in the Paris area, Atmos. Environ., 42,
390–402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.044</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dieme, D., Cabral-Ndior, M., Garçon, G., Verdin, A., Billet, S., Cazier,
F., Courcot, D., Diouf, A., and Shirali, P.: Relationship between
physicochemical characterization and toxicity of fine particulate matter
(PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) collected in Dakar city (Senegal), Environ. Res., 113,
1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.11.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envres.2011.11.009</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ding, A., Huang, X., and Fu, C.: Air Pollution and Weather Interaction in
East Asia, Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Environ. Sci., 1, 1–26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.536" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.536</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Djossou, J., Léon, J.-F., Akpo, A. B., Liousse, C., Yoboué, V.,
Bedou, M., Bodjrenou, M., Chiron, C., Galy-Lacaux, C., Gardrat, E., Abbey,
M., Keita, S., Bahino, J., Touré N'Datchoh, E., Ossohou, M., and Awanou,
C. N.: Mass concentration, optical depth and carbon composition of
particulate matter in the major southern West African cities of Cotonou
(Benin) and Abidjan (Côte d'Ivoire), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18,
6275–6291, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6275-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-6275-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Doumbia, E. H. T., Liousse, C., Galy-Lacaux, C., Ndiaye, S. A., Diop, B.,
Ouafo, M., Assamoi,
E.M., Gardrat, E., Castera, P., Rosset, R., Akpo, A., and Sigha, L.: Real time black carbon measurements in West and Central
Africa urban sites, Atmos. Environ.,  54, 529–537, 2012..</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G. D.: Evaluation of the Transfer Coefficient
Matrix (TCM) approach to model the atmospheric radionuclide air
concentrations from Fukushima, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D05107,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017205</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Du, Z., He, K., Cheng, Y., Duan, F., Ma, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, X., Zheng, M.,
and Weber, R.: A yearlong study of water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing
I: Sources and its primary vs. secondary nature, Atmos. Environ.,
92, 514–521, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.060</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5351?><ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Favez, O.: Caractérisation physico-chimique de la pollution particulaire
dans des mégapoles contrastées, Thèse de l'Université
PARIS.DIDEROT (Paris 7), France, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Favez, O., Sciare, J., Cachier, H., Alfaro, S. C., and Abdelwahab, M. M.:
Significant formation of water-insoluble secondary organic aerosols in
semi-arid urban environment, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L15801,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034446" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL034446</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Feng, J., Guo, Z., Chan, C. K., and Fang, M.: Properties of organic matter in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  at Changdao Island, China – A rural site in the transport path
of the Asian continental outflow, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1924–1935,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.064</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Feng, J., Hu, M., Chan, C. K., Lau, P. S., Fang, M., He, L., and Tang, X.: A
comparative study of the organic matter in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  from three Chinese
megacities in three different climatic zones, Atmos. Environ.,
40, 3983–3994, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.017</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Freitas, M. C., Pacheco, A. M. G., Baptista, M. S., Dionísio, I.,
Vasconcelos, M. T. S. D., and Cabral, J. P.: Response of exposed detached lichens
to atmospheric elemental deposition, Proc. ECOpole., 1, 15–21, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gaga, E. O., Arı, A., Akyol, N., Üzmez, Ö. Ö., Kara, M., Chow,
J. C., Watson, J. G., Özel, E., Döğeroğlu, T., and Odabasi,
M.: Determination of real-world emission factors of trace metals, EC, OC,
BTEX, and semivolatile organic compounds (PAHs, PCBs and PCNs) in a rural
tunnel in Bilecik, Turkey, Sci. Total Environ., 643, 1285–1296,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.227" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.227</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gao, Y., Nelson, E. D., Field, M. P., Ding, Q., Li, H., Sherrell, R. M.,
Gigliotti, C. L., Van Ry, D. A., Glenn, T. R., and Eisenreich, S. J.:
Characterization of atmospheric trace elements on PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particulate
matter over the New York–New Jersey harbor estuary, Atmos.
Environ., 36, 1077–1086, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00381-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00381-8</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Genga, A., Ielpo, P., Siciliano, T., and Siciliano, M.: Carbonaceous
particles and aerosol mass closure in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  collected in a port city,
Atmos. Res., 183, 245–254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.022</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Goldberg, E. D.: Composition of sea Water, edited by: Hill, H. M., Comparative Oceanography, Vol. 2, SeaWiley, New York, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gounougbe, F.: Pollution atmosphérique par les gaz d'échappement et
état de santé des conducteurs de taxi-moto (Zemidjan) de Cotonou
(Bénin), Thèse de doctorat en Médecine (832), 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guinot, B., Cachier, H., and Oikonomou, K.: Geochemical perspectives from a
new aerosol chemical mass closure, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1657–1670, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1657-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1657-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guttikunda, S. K. and Calori, G.: A GIS based emissions inventory at 1 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 km spatial resolution for air pollution analysis in Delhi,
India, Atmos. Environ., 67, 101–111,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.040</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hara, K., Osada, K., Kido, M., Hayashi, M., Matsunaga, K., Iwasaka, Y.,
Yamanouchi, T., Hashida, G., and Fukatsu, T.: Chemistry of sea-salt particles
and inorganic halogen species in Antarctic regions: Compositional
differences between coastal and inland stations, J. Geophys. Res., 109,
D20208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004713" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004713</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>He, K., Yang, F., Ma, Y., Zhang, Q., Yao, X., Chan, C. K., Cadle, S., Chan,
T., and Mulawa, P.: The characteristics of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing, China,
Atmos. Environ., 35, 4959–4970, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00301-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00301-6</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hildemann, L. M., Markowski, G. R., and Cass, G. R.: Chemical composition of
emissions from urban sources of fine organic aerosol, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 25, 744–759, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00016a021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00016a021</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, H., Ho, K. F., Lee, S. C., Tsang, P. K., Ho, S. S. H., Zou, C. W.,
Zou, S. C., Cao, J. J., and Xu, H. M.: Characteristics of carbonaceous
aerosol in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: Pearl Delta River Region, China, Atmos. Res.,
104/105, 227–236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.10.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.10.016</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jaffrezo, J.-L., Aymoz, G., Delaval, C., and Cozic, J.: Seasonal variations of the water soluble organic carbon mass fraction of aerosol in two valleys of the French Alps, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2809–2821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2809-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2809-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Keita, S., Liousse, C., Yoboué, V., Dominutti, P., Guinot, B., Assamoi,
E.-M., Borbon, A., Haslett, S. L., Bouvier, L., Colomb, A., Coe, H., Akpo,
A., Adon, J., Bahino, J., Doumbia, M., Djossou, J., Galy-Lacaux, C.,
Gardrat, E., Gnamien, S., Léon, J. F., Ossohou, M.,
N&amp;amp;apos;Datchoh, E. T., and Roblou, L.: Particle and VOC emission
factor measurements for anthropogenic sources in West Africa, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 18, 7691–7708, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7691-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7691-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Khan, Md. F., Shirasuna, Y., Hirano, K., and Masunaga, S.: Characterization
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in ambient air,
Yokohama, Japan, Atmos. Res., 96, 159–172,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.12.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.12.009</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kim, H., Liu, X., Kobayashi, T., Kohyama, T., Wen, F.-Q., Romberger, D. J.,
Conner, H., Gilmour, P. S., Donaldson, K., MacNee, W., and Rennard, S. I.:
Ultrafine Carbon Black Particles Inhibit Human Lung Fibroblast-Mediated
Collagen Gel Contraction, Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol., 28, 111–121,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.4796" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1165/rcmb.4796</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Knippertz, P., Tesche, M., Heinold, B., Kandler, K., Toledano, C., and
Esselborn, M.: Dust mobilization and aerosol transport from West Africa to
Cape Verde – a meteorological overview of SAMUM-2, Tellus B, 63, 430–447, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00544.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00544.x</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kouassi, K. S., Billet, S., Garaßon, G., Verdin, A., Diouf,
A., Cazier, F., Djaman, J., Courcot, D., and Shirali, P.: Oxidative damage
induced in A549 cells by physically and chemically characterized air
particulate matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) collected in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, J.
Appl. Toxicol., 30, 310–320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.1496" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jat.1496</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lamaison, L.: Caractérisation des particules atmosphériques et
identification de leurs sources dans une atmosphère urbaine sous influence
industrielle, Thèse Doctorat, Univ des Sciences et Technologies, Lille,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Léon, J.F., Akpo, A., Bedou, M., Djossou, J., Bodjrenou, M., Yoboué,
V., and Liousse, C.: Profondeur optique des aérosols sur le sud de
l'Afrique de l'Ouest, soumis à ACPD, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, T.-C., Yuan, C.-S., Hung, C.-H., Lin, H.-Y., Huang, H.-C., and Lee,
C.-L.: Chemical Characteristics of Marine Fine Aerosols over Sea and at
Offshore Islands during Three Cruise Sampling Campaigns in the Taiwan
Strait-Sea Salts and Anthropogenic Particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,
1–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-384" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2016-384</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Schwandner, F. M., Sewell, H. J., Zivkovich, A., Tigges, M., Raja,
S., Holcomb, S., Molenar, J. V., Sherman, L., Archuleta, C.<?pagebreak page5352?>, Lee, T., and
Collett, J. L.: Observations of ammonia, nitric acid and fine particles in a
rural gas production region, Atmos. Environ., 83, 80–89,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.007</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Liang, L., Engling, G., Du, Z., Cheng, Y., Duan, F., Liu, X., and He, K.:
Seasonal variations and source estimation of saccharides in atmospheric
particulate matter in Beijing, China, Chemosphere, 150, 365–377, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liousse, C., Assamoi, E., Criqui, P., Granier, C., and Rosset, R.: Explosive
growth in African combustion emissions from 2005 to 2030, Environ. Res.
Lett., 9, 035003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lonati, G., Ozgen, S., and Giugliano, M.: Primary and secondary carbonaceous
species in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples in Milan (Italy), Atmos. Environ.,
41, 4599–4610, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.046</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lowenthal, D., Zielinska, B., Samburova, V., Collins, D., Taylor, N., and
Kumar, N.: Evaluation of assumptions for estimating chemical light
extinction at U.S. national parks, J. Air   Waste Manag.
Assoc., 65, 249–260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2014.986307" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10962247.2014.986307</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mason, B. and Moore, B. C.: Principles of Geochemistry, 4th Edn., John Wiley
and Sons, New York,  46–47, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Minguillón, M. C., Cirach, M., Hoek, G., Brunekreef, B., Tsai, M., de
Hoogh, K., Jedynska, A., Kooter, I. M., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., and Querol, X.:
Spatial variability of trace elements and sources for improved exposure
assessment in Barcelona, Atmos. Environ., 89, 268–281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.047</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mkoma, S. L.: Physico-Chemical characterisation of atmospheric aerosols in
Tanzania, with emphasis on the carbonaceous aerosol components and on
chemical mass closure, PhD, Ghent University, Ghent, Belguim, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mmari, A. G., Potgieter-Vermaak, S. S., Bencs, L., McCrindle, R. I., and Van
Grieken, R.: Elemental and ionic components of atmospheric aerosols and
associated gaseous pollutants in and near Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,
Atmos. Environ., 77, 51–61, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.061</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
MMEH (Ministère des Mines de l'Energie et d'Hydraulique): Tableau de
bord de l'Energie 2002 au Bénin, Direction Générale de
l'Energie, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ngo, N. S., Asseko, S. V. J., Ebanega, M. O., Allo'o Allo'o, S. M., and
Hystad, P.: The relationship among PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, traffic emissions, and
socioeconomic status: Evidence from Gabon using low-cost, portable air
quality monitors, Transport. Res. Pt. D,
68, 2–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.029</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ozer, P.: Estimation de la pollution particulaire naturelle de l'air en 2003
à Niamey (Niger) à partir de données de visibilité
horizontale, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pachauri, T., Singla, V., Satsangi, A., Lakhani, A., and Kumari, K. M.:
Characterization of carbonaceous aerosols with special reference to episodic
events at Agra, India, Atmos. Res., 128, 98–110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.03.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.03.010</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Park, J. H., Mudunkotuwa, I. A., Mines, L. W. D., Anthony, T. R., Grassian,
V. H., and Peters, T. M.: A Granular Bed for Use in a Nanoparticle
Respiratory Deposition Sampler, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 49,
179–187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1013521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2015.1013521</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Person, A. and Tymen, G.: Mesurage des particules en suspension dans l'air
en relation avec la santé, Pollution atmosphèrique, 271–285, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pipal, A. S., Jan, R., Satsangi, P. G., Tiwari, S., and Taneja, A.: Study of
Surface Morphology, Elemental Composition and Origin of Atmospheric Aerosols
(PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) over Agra, India, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 14,
1685–1700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.01.0017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2014.01.0017</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pipal, A. S., Singh, S., and Satsangi, G. P.: Study on bulk to single
particle analysis of atmospheric aerosols at urban region, Urban Clim.,
27, 243–258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2018.12.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.uclim.2018.12.008</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prospero, J. M., Ginoux, P., Torres, O., Nicholson, S. E., and Gill, T. E.:
Environmental characterization of global sources of atmospheric soil dust
identified with the NIMBUS 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS)
absorbing aerosol product, Rev. Geophys., 40, 1002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000RG000095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000RG000095</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Qin, Y., Chan, C. K., and Chan, L. Y.: Characteristics of chemical
compositions of atmospheric aerosols in Hong Kong: spatial and seasonal
distributions, Sci. Total Environ., 206, 25–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00214-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00214-3</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ramgolam, K., Favez, O., Cachier, H., Gaudichet, A., Marano, F., Martinon, L., and
Baeza-Squiban, A.: Size-partitioning of an urban aerosol to identify particle
determinants involved in the proinflammatory response induced in airway
epithelial cells, Part Fibre Toxicol., 6, 10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-6-10" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/1743-8977-6-10</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rengarajan, R., Sudheer, A. K., and Sarin, M. M.: Aerosol acidity and
secondary organic aerosol formation during wintertime over urban environment
in western India, Atmos. Environ., 45, 1940–1945, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.026</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Samara, C., Kouimtzis, T., Tsitouridou, R., Kanias, G., and Simeonov, V.:
Chemical mass balance source apportionment of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in an industrialized
urban area of Northern Greece, Atmos. Environ., 37, 41–54,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00772-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00772-0</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Satsangi, A., Pachauri, T., Singla, V., Lakhani, A., and Kumari, K. M.:
Organic and elemental carbon aerosols at a suburban site, Atmos.
Res., 113, 13–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.04.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.04.012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Saxena, P. and Hildemann, L. M.: Water-soluble organics in atmospheric
particles: a critical review of the literature and application of
thermodynamics to identify candidate compounds, J. Atmos. Chem., 24,
57–109, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sciare, J., Oikonomou, K., Cachier, H., Mihalopoulos, N., Andreae, M. O.,
Maenhaut, W., and Sarda-Estève, R.: Aerosol mass closure and
reconstruction of the light scattering coefficient over the Eastern
Mediterranean Sea during the MINOS campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5,
2253–2265, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2253-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2253-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: from
Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sempére, R. and Kawamura, K.: Comparative distributions of dicarboxylic acids and related polar compounds in snow, rain and aerosols from urban atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 28, 449–459, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90123-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1352-2310(94)90123-6</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5353?><ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shahsavani, A., Naddafi, K., Jaafarzadeh Haghighifard, N., Mesdaghinia, A.,
Yunesian, M., Nabizadeh, R., Arhami, M., Yarahmadi, M., Sowlat, M. H.,
Ghani, M., Jonidi Jafari, A., Alimohamadi, M., Motevalian, S. A., and
Soleimani, Z.: Characterization of ionic composition of TSP and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during
the Middle Eastern Dust (MED) storms in Ahvaz, Iran, Environ. Monit. Assess.,
184, 6683–6692, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2451-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10661-011-2451-6</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stone, R. S., Herber, A., Vitale, V., Mazzola, M., Lupi, A., Schnell, R. C.,
Dutton, E. G., Liu, P. S. K., Li, S.-M., Dethloff, K., Lampert, A., Ritter,
C., Stock, M., Neuber, R., and Maturilli, M.: A three-dimensional
characterization of Arctic aerosols from airborne Sun photometer
observations: PAM-ARCMIP, April 2009, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D13203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013605" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013605</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., Clements, A. L., Turner, J. R., Bae, M. S.,
and Schauer, J. J.: A method for on-line measurement of water-soluble
organic carbon in ambient aerosol particles: Results from an urban site:
on-line measurement of WSOC in aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L13105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019681" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL019681</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Zhuang, G., Wang, Y., Han, L., Guo, J., Dan, M., Zhang, W., Wang,
Z., and Hao, Z.: The airborne particulate pollution in Beijing –
concentration, composition, distribution and sources, Atmos.
Environ., 38, 5991–6004, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.07.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.07.009</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tang, X., Zhang, X., Ci, Z., Guo, J., and Wang, J.: Speciation of the major
inorganic salts in atmospheric aerosols of Beijing, China: Measurements and
comparison with model, Atmos. Environ., 133, 123–134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.013</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tapsoba, D.: Caractérisation événementielle des régimes
pluviométriques ouestafricains et de leur récent changement,
Thèse de Doctorat, Univ. Paris-XI (Orsay), 100 pp., 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Taylor, S. R.: Abundance of chemical elements in the continental crust: a
new table, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 28, 1273–1285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(64)90129-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(64)90129-2</ext-link>, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Terzi, E., Argyropoulos, G., Bougatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., Nikolaou, K.,
and Samara, C.: Chemical composition and mass closure of ambient PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
urban sites, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2231–2239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.019</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tunno, B., Longley, I., Somervell, E., Edwards, S., Olivares, G., Gray, S.,
Cambal, L., Chubb, L., Roper, C., Coulson, G., and Clougherty, J. E.:
Separating spatial patterns in pollution attributable to woodsmoke and other
sources, during daytime and nighttime hours, in Christchurch, New Zealand,
Environ. Res., 171, 228–238, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.033</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Turpin, B. J., Cary, R. A., and Huntzicker, J. J.: An In Situ, Time-Resolved
Analyzer for Aerosol Organic and Elemental Carbon, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 12, 161–171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829008959336" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829008959336</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population
Division (2019), World Population Prospects 2019, Vol. II: Demographic
Profiles, Made available under a Creative Commons license, available at:
<uri>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/</uri> (last access: 25 March 2020), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Val, S., Liousse, C., Doumbia, E. H. T., Galy-Lacaux, C., Cachier, H.,
Marchand, N., Badel, A., Gardrat, E., Sylvestre, A., and Baeza-Squiban, A.:
Physico-chemical characterization of African urban aerosols (Bamako in Mali
and Dakar in Senegal) and their toxic effects in human bronchial epithelial
cells: description of a worrying situation, Part Fibre Toxicol., 10, 10,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-10-10" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/1743-8977-10-10</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Viana, M., Maenhaut, W., ten Brink, H. M., Chi, X., Weijers, E., Querol, X.,
Alastuey, A., Mikuška, P., and Večeřa, Z.: Comparative analysis
of organic and elemental carbon concentrations in carbonaceous aerosols in
three European cities, Atmos. Environ., 41, 5972–5983, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.035</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Viana, M., López, J. M., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., García-Gacio,
D., Blanco-Heras, G., López-Mahía, P., Piñeiro-Iglesias, M.,
Sanz, M. J., Sanz, F., Chi, X., and Maenhaut, W.: Tracers and impact of open
burning of rice straw residues on PM in Eastern Spain, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 1941–1957, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.012</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Viidanoja, J., Sillanpää, M., Laakia, J., Kerminen, V.-M., Hillamo,
R., Aarnio, P., and Koskentalo, T.: Organic and black carbon in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: 1 year of data from an urban site in Helsinki, Finland, Atmos.
Environ., 36, 3183–3193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00205-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00205-4</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Bi, X., Sheng, G., and Fu, J.: Chemical Composition and Sources of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  Aerosols in Guangzhou, China, Environ. Monit. Assess.,
119, 425–439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9034-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10661-005-9034-3</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Washington, R., Todd, M., Middleton, N. J., and Goudie, A. S.: Dust-Storm
Source Areas Determined by the Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer and
Surface Observations, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr.,
93, 297–313, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.9302003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/1467-8306.9302003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Watson, J. G. and Chow, J. C.: Estimating middle-, neighborhood-, and
urban-scale contributions to elemental carbon in Mexico City with a rapid
response aethalometer, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 51, 1522–1528, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., and Houck, J. E.: PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  chemical source
profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and
coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995, Chemosphere, 43,
1141–1151, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00171-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00171-5</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>WHO (World Health Organization): 7 million premature deaths annually linked
to air pollution. Media Centre news release, Geneva: World Health
Organization, available at: <uri>http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-pollution/en/</uri> (last access: 14 November 2018), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wilson, M. R., Lightbody, J. H., Donaldson, K., Sales, J., and Stone, V.:
Interactions between ultrafine particles and transition metals in vivo and
in vitro, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 184, 172–179, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xiang, P., Zhou, X., Duan, J., Tan, J., He, K., Yuan, C., Ma, Y., and Zhang,
Y.: Chemical characteristics of water-soluble organic compounds (WSOC) in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing, China: 2011–2012, Atmos. Res., 183, 104–112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.020</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5354?><ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, Y., Wang, Y., Bilal, M., and Dong, W.: Mapping daily PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at 500 m resolution over Beijing with improved hazy day performance, Sci.
Total Environ., 659, 410–418, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.365" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.365</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xu, H., Léon, J.-F., Liousse, C., Guinot, B., Yoboué, V., Akpo, A. B., Adon, J., Ho, K. F., Ho, S. S. H., Li, L., Gardrat, E., Shen, Z., and Cao, J.: Personal exposure to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted from typical anthropogenic sources in southern West Africa: chemical characteristics and associated health risks, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6637–6657, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6637-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6637-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Xu, J., Zhang, Y., Zheng, S., and He, Y.: Aerosol effects on ozone
concentrations in Beijing: a model sensitivity study, J. Environ. Sci. (China),
24, 645–656, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, P., Froyd, K. D., Portmann, R. W., Toon, O. B., Freitas, S. R., Bardeen,
C. G., Katich, J. M., Schwarz, J. P., Williamson, C., Kupc, A., Brock, C.,
Liu, S., Gao, R.-S., Schill, G., Fan, T., Rosenlof, K. H., and Murphy, D.
M.: An improved treatment of aerosol convective transport and removal in a
chemistry-climate model, Geophys. Res. Lett., submitted, 2020.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zghaid, M., Noack, Y., Bounakla, M., and Benyaich, F.: Pollution
atmosphérique particulaire dans la ville de Kenitra (Maroc), Pollution
atmosphérique [En ligne], no. 203, mis à jour le
12 October 2015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4267/pollution-atmospherique.1184" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4267/pollution-atmospherique.1184</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X. Y., Gong, S. L., Shen, Z. X., Mei, F. M., Xi, X. X., Liu, L.C.,
Zhou, Z. J., Wang, D., Wang, Y. Q., and Cheng, Y.: Characterization of soil
dust aerosol in China and its transport and distribution during 2001
ACE-Asia: 1. Network observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4261,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002632" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002632</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Physico-chemical characterization of urban aerosols from specific combustion sources in West Africa at Abidjan in Côte d'Ivoire and Cotonou in Benin in the frame of the DACCIWA program</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Urban air pollution in West Africa has yet to be well characterized. In the
frame of DACCIWA (Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West
Africa) program, intensive measurement campaigns were performed in Abidjan
(Côte d'Ivoire) and Cotonou (Benin), in dry (January 2016 and 2017) and
wet (July 2015 and 2016) seasons, at different sites chosen to be
representative of African urban combustion sources, i.e., domestic fires
(ADF), traffic (AT) and waste burning (AWB) sources in Abidjan and traffic
source in Cotonou (CT). Both the size distribution of particulate matter
(PM) and their chemical composition including elemental carbon (EC), organic
carbon (OC), water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC), water-soluble inorganic
ions (WSI) and trace metals were examined. Results show very high PM
concentrations at all sites and a well-marked seasonality as well as a
strong spatial variation. The average PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations
during the wet season are 517.3, 104.1, 90.3, and 69.1&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup> at
the ADF, CT, AT, and AWB sites, respectively. In the dry season, PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations decrease to 375.7&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup> at the ADF site, while
they increase to 269.7, 141.3, and 175.3&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup> at the CT, AT, and
AWB sites, respectively. The annual PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels at almost all sites
are significantly higher than the WHO guideline level of 10&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>. As for PM mass, (EC) and (OC) concentrations are also maximal at
the ADF site, accounting for up to 69&thinsp;% of the total PM mass. Such a high content is
mainly linked to wood burning for domestic cooking and commercial food
smoking activities. Dust contributions are dominant at CT (57&thinsp;%–80&thinsp;%), AT
(20&thinsp;%–70&thinsp;%), and AWB (30&thinsp;%–69&thinsp;%) sites and especially in the coarse and fine-particle modes at the CT site and in the coarse fraction at the AT site, which may be
explained by the impact of long-range desert-dust transport and resuspended
particles from the roads, in addition to anthropogenic sources. The
contributions of WSI to the total PM mass, mainly driven by chloride,
nitrate, and calcium in the fine and/or large particles, are highly variable
according to the sites but remain less than 30&thinsp;%. Values are generally 1–3 times higher in the wet season than in the dry season. This is due not only to
anthropogenic emissions but also to nitrate formation by reaction processes
and natural emissions. The concentrations of trace elements reflect well the
trends in dust at the traffic and AWB sites, with a predominance of Al, Na,
Ca, Fe, and K, keys markers of crustal dust. This study constitutes an
original database that characterizes specific African combustion sources.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adon, M., Galy-Lacaux, C., Yoboué, V., Delon, C., Lacaux, J. P.,
Castera, P., Gardrat, E., Pienaar, J., Al Ourabi, H., Laouali, D., Diop, B.,
Sigha-Nkamdjou, L., Akpo, A., Tathy, J. P., Lavenu, F., and Mougin, E.: Long
term measurements of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ammonia, nitric acid
and ozone in Africa using passive samplers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
7467–7487, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7467-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7467-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Castillo, S., Escudero, M., Avila, A., Cuevas, E.,
Torres, C., Romero, P., Exposito, F., and Garcia, O.: Characterisation of TSP
and PM<sub>2.5</sub> at Izaña and Sta, Cruz de Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain)
during a Saharan Dust Episode (July 2002), Atmos. Environ., 39,
4715–4728, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.018</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Arditsoglou, A. and Samara, C.: Levels of total suspended particulate matter
and major trace elements in Kosovo: a source identification and
apportionment study, Chemosphere, 59, 669–678, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.056</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Arndt, R. L., Carmichael, G. R., Streets, D. G., and Bhatti, N.: Sulfur
dioxide emissions and sectorial contributions to sulfur deposition in Asia,
Atmos. Environ., 31, 1553–1572, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00236-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00236-1</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Avogbe, P. H., Ayi-Fanou, L., Cachon, B., Chabi, N., Debende, A., Dewaele,
D., Aissi, F., Cazier, F., and Sanni, A.: Hematological changes among
Beninese motor-bike taxi drivers exposed to benzene by urban air pollution,
Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 5, 464–472,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Balarabe, M., Abdullah, K., and Nawawi, M.: Seasonal Variations of Aerosol
Optical Properties and Identification of Different Aerosol Types Based on
AERONET Data over Sub-Sahara West-Africa, Atmos. Clim. Sci., 6, 13–28,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2016.61002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2016.61002</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Belis, C. A., Karagulian, F., Larsen, B. R., and Hopke, P. K.: Critical
review and meta-analysis of ambient particulate matter source apportionment
using receptor models in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 69, 94–108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.009</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bisht, D. S., Dumka, U. C., Kaskaoutis, D. G., Pipal, A. S., Srivastava, A. K.,
Soni, V. K., Attri, S. D., Sateesh, M., and Tiwari, S.: Carbonaceous aerosols and
pollutants over Delhi urban environment: Temporal evolution, source
apportionment and radiative forcing, Sci. Total Environ.,
521/522, 431–445, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O.: Aérosols atmosphériques Propriétés et impacts climatiques, Springer Paris,  2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bouhila, Z., Mouzai, M., Azli, T., Nedjar, A., Mazouzi, C., Zergoug, Z.,
Boukhadra, D., Chegrouche, S., and Lounici, H.: Investigation of aerosol
trace element concentrations nearby Algiers for environmental monitoring
using instrumental neutron activation analysis, Atmos. Res., 166,
49–59, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.06.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.06.013</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cachier, H., Brémond, M.-P., and Buat-Ménard, P.: Carbonaceous
aerosols from different tropical biomass burning sources, Nature, 340,
371–373, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/340371a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/340371a0</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Cachon, B. F., Firmin, S., Verdin, A., Ayi-Fanou, L., Billet, S., Cazier,
F., Martin, P. J., Aissi, F., Courcot, D., Sanni, A., and Shirali, P.:
Proinflammatory effects and oxidative stress within human bronchial
epithelial cells exposed to atmospheric particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and
PM<sub> &gt; 2.5</sub>) collected from Cotonou, Benin, Environ. Pollut., 185,
340–351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.026</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Zhang, X. Y., Chow, J. C., An, Z. S., Ho, K. F., Watson,
J. G., Fung, K., Wang, Y. Q., and Shen, Z. X.: Characterization of airborne
carbonate over a site near Asian dust source regions during spring 2002 and
its climatic and environmental significance, J. Geophys. Res., 110,
D03203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005244" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005244</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cassee, F. R., Héroux, M.-E., Gerlofs-Nijland, M. E., and Kelly, F. J.:
Particulate matter beyond mass: recent health evidence on the role of
fractions, chemical constituents and sources of emission, Inhal.
Toxicol., 25, 802–812, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2013.850127" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2013.850127</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Celo, V., Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E., Mathieu, D., and Okonskaia, I.: Validation of
simple microwave-assisted acid digestion method using microvessels for
analysis of trace elements in atmospheric PM<sub>2.5</sub>  in monitoring and
fingerprinting studies,   Open Chem. Biomed. Method. J.,
3, 141–150, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cesari, D., Donateo, A., Conte, M., Merico, E., Giangreco, A., Giangreco, F.,
and Contini, D.: An inter-comparison of PM<sub>2.5</sub> at urban and urban
background sites: Chemical characterization and source apportionment,
Atmos. Res., 174/175, 106–119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.004</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Z., Jiang, J., Chen, C., Gao, J., Wang, S., Watson, J. G., Wang, H.,
Deng, J., Wang, B., Zhou, M., Chow, J. C., Pitchford, M. L., and Hao, J.:
Estimation of Aerosol Mass Scattering Efficiencies under High Mass Loading:
Case Study for the Megacity of Shanghai, China, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
49, 831–838, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es504567q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es504567q</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Chiapello, I., Bergametti, G., Chatenet, B., Bousquet, P., Dulac, F., and
Soares, E. S.: Origins of African dust transported over the northeastern
tropical Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 13701–13709, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00259" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00259</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Lu, Z., Lowenthal, D. H., Frazier, C. A.,
Solomon, P. A., Thuillier, R. H., and Magliano, K.: Descriptive analysis of
PM<sub>2.5</sub>  and PM<sub>10</sub> at regionally representative locations during
SJVAQS/AUSPEX, Atmos. Environ., 30, 2079–2112,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00402-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00402-5</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Colbeck, I., Nasir, Z. A., Ahmad, S., and Ali, Z.: Exposure to PM<sub>10</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>,
PM1 and Carbon Monoxide on Roads in Lahore, Pakistan, Aerosol Air Qual.
Res., 11, 689–695, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2010.10.0087" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2010.10.0087</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Colette, A., Menut, L., Haeffelin, M., and Morille, Y.: Impact of the
transport of aerosols from the free troposphere towards the boundary layer
on the air quality in the Paris area, Atmos. Environ., 42,
390–402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.044</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Dieme, D., Cabral-Ndior, M., Garçon, G., Verdin, A., Billet, S., Cazier,
F., Courcot, D., Diouf, A., and Shirali, P.: Relationship between
physicochemical characterization and toxicity of fine particulate matter
(PM<sub>2.5</sub>) collected in Dakar city (Senegal), Environ. Res., 113,
1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.11.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.11.009</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, A., Huang, X., and Fu, C.: Air Pollution and Weather Interaction in
East Asia, Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Environ. Sci., 1, 1–26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.536" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.536</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Djossou, J., Léon, J.-F., Akpo, A. B., Liousse, C., Yoboué, V.,
Bedou, M., Bodjrenou, M., Chiron, C., Galy-Lacaux, C., Gardrat, E., Abbey,
M., Keita, S., Bahino, J., Touré N'Datchoh, E., Ossohou, M., and Awanou,
C. N.: Mass concentration, optical depth and carbon composition of
particulate matter in the major southern West African cities of Cotonou
(Benin) and Abidjan (Côte d'Ivoire), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18,
6275–6291, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6275-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6275-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Doumbia, E. H. T., Liousse, C., Galy-Lacaux, C., Ndiaye, S. A., Diop, B.,
Ouafo, M., Assamoi,
E.M., Gardrat, E., Castera, P., Rosset, R., Akpo, A., and Sigha, L.: Real time black carbon measurements in West and Central
Africa urban sites, Atmos. Environ.,  54, 529–537, 2012..
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G. D.: Evaluation of the Transfer Coefficient
Matrix (TCM) approach to model the atmospheric radionuclide air
concentrations from Fukushima, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D05107,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017205" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017205</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Du, Z., He, K., Cheng, Y., Duan, F., Ma, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, X., Zheng, M.,
and Weber, R.: A yearlong study of water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing
I: Sources and its primary vs. secondary nature, Atmos. Environ.,
92, 514–521, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.060</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Favez, O.: Caractérisation physico-chimique de la pollution particulaire
dans des&thinsp;mégapoles contrastées, Thèse de l'Université
PARIS.DIDEROT (Paris 7), France, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Favez, O., Sciare, J., Cachier, H., Alfaro, S. C., and Abdelwahab, M. M.:
Significant formation of water-insoluble secondary organic aerosols in
semi-arid urban environment, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L15801,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034446" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034446</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, J., Guo, Z., Chan, C. K., and Fang, M.: Properties of organic matter in
PM<sub>2.5</sub>  at Changdao Island, China – A rural site in the transport path
of the Asian continental outflow, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1924–1935,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.064</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, J., Hu, M., Chan, C. K., Lau, P. S., Fang, M., He, L., and Tang, X.: A
comparative study of the organic matter in PM<sub>2.5</sub>  from three Chinese
megacities in three different climatic zones, Atmos. Environ.,
40, 3983–3994, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.017</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Freitas, M. C., Pacheco, A. M. G., Baptista, M. S., Dionísio, I.,
Vasconcelos, M. T. S. D., and Cabral, J. P.: Response of exposed detached lichens
to atmospheric elemental deposition, Proc. ECOpole., 1, 15–21, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Gaga, E. O., Arı, A., Akyol, N., Üzmez, Ö. Ö., Kara, M., Chow,
J. C., Watson, J. G., Özel, E., Döğeroğlu, T., and Odabasi,
M.: Determination of real-world emission factors of trace metals, EC, OC,
BTEX, and semivolatile organic compounds (PAHs, PCBs and PCNs) in a rural
tunnel in Bilecik, Turkey, Sci. Total Environ., 643, 1285–1296,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.227" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.227</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, Y., Nelson, E. D., Field, M. P., Ding, Q., Li, H., Sherrell, R. M.,
Gigliotti, C. L., Van Ry, D. A., Glenn, T. R., and Eisenreich, S. J.:
Characterization of atmospheric trace elements on PM<sub>2.5</sub> particulate
matter over the New York–New Jersey harbor estuary, Atmos.
Environ., 36, 1077–1086, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00381-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00381-8</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Genga, A., Ielpo, P., Siciliano, T., and Siciliano, M.: Carbonaceous
particles and aerosol mass closure in PM<sub>2.5</sub>  collected in a port city,
Atmos. Res., 183, 245–254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.022</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Goldberg, E. D.: Composition of sea Water, edited by: Hill, H. M., Comparative Oceanography, Vol. 2, SeaWiley, New York, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Gounougbe, F.: Pollution atmosphérique par les gaz d'échappement et
état de santé des conducteurs de taxi-moto (Zemidjan) de Cotonou
(Bénin), Thèse de doctorat en Médecine (832), 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Guinot, B., Cachier, H., and Oikonomou, K.: Geochemical perspectives from a
new aerosol chemical mass closure, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1657–1670, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1657-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1657-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Guttikunda, S. K. and Calori, G.: A GIS based emissions inventory at 1&thinsp;km&thinsp; × &thinsp;1&thinsp;km spatial resolution for air pollution analysis in Delhi,
India, Atmos. Environ., 67, 101–111,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.040</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Hara, K., Osada, K., Kido, M., Hayashi, M., Matsunaga, K., Iwasaka, Y.,
Yamanouchi, T., Hashida, G., and Fukatsu, T.: Chemistry of sea-salt particles
and inorganic halogen species in Antarctic regions: Compositional
differences between coastal and inland stations, J. Geophys. Res., 109,
D20208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004713" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004713</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
He, K., Yang, F., Ma, Y., Zhang, Q., Yao, X., Chan, C. K., Cadle, S., Chan,
T., and Mulawa, P.: The characteristics of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Beijing, China,
Atmos. Environ., 35, 4959–4970, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00301-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00301-6</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Hildemann, L. M., Markowski, G. R., and Cass, G. R.: Chemical composition of
emissions from urban sources of fine organic aerosol, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 25, 744–759, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00016a021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es00016a021</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, H., Ho, K. F., Lee, S. C., Tsang, P. K., Ho, S. S. H., Zou, C. W.,
Zou, S. C., Cao, J. J., and Xu, H. M.: Characteristics of carbonaceous
aerosol in PM<sub>2.5</sub>: Pearl Delta River Region, China, Atmos. Res.,
104/105, 227–236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.10.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.10.016</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Jaffrezo, J.-L., Aymoz, G., Delaval, C., and Cozic, J.: Seasonal variations of the water soluble organic carbon mass fraction of aerosol in two valleys of the French Alps, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2809–2821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2809-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2809-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Keita, S., Liousse, C., Yoboué, V., Dominutti, P., Guinot, B., Assamoi,
E.-M., Borbon, A., Haslett, S. L., Bouvier, L., Colomb, A., Coe, H., Akpo,
A., Adon, J., Bahino, J., Doumbia, M., Djossou, J., Galy-Lacaux, C.,
Gardrat, E., Gnamien, S., Léon, J. F., Ossohou, M.,
N&amp;amp;apos;Datchoh, E. T., and Roblou, L.: Particle and VOC emission
factor measurements for anthropogenic sources in West Africa, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 18, 7691–7708, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7691-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7691-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Khan, Md. F., Shirasuna, Y., Hirano, K., and Masunaga, S.: Characterization
of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>2.5−10</sub> and PM<sub><i>&gt;</i>10</sub> in ambient air,
Yokohama, Japan, Atmos. Res., 96, 159–172,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.12.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.12.009</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, H., Liu, X., Kobayashi, T., Kohyama, T., Wen, F.-Q., Romberger, D. J.,
Conner, H., Gilmour, P. S., Donaldson, K., MacNee, W., and Rennard, S. I.:
Ultrafine Carbon Black Particles Inhibit Human Lung Fibroblast-Mediated
Collagen Gel Contraction, Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol., 28, 111–121,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.4796" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.4796</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Knippertz, P., Tesche, M., Heinold, B., Kandler, K., Toledano, C., and
Esselborn, M.: Dust mobilization and aerosol transport from West Africa to
Cape Verde – a meteorological overview of SAMUM-2, Tellus B, 63, 430–447, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00544.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00544.x</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Kouassi, K. S., Billet, S., Garaßon, G., Verdin, A., Diouf,
A., Cazier, F., Djaman, J., Courcot, D., and Shirali, P.: Oxidative damage
induced in A549 cells by physically and chemically characterized air
particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) collected in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, J.
Appl. Toxicol., 30, 310–320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.1496" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.1496</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Lamaison, L.: Caractérisation des particules atmosphériques et
identification de leurs sources dans une atmosphère urbaine sous influence
industrielle, Thèse Doctorat, Univ des Sciences et Technologies, Lille,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Léon, J.F., Akpo, A., Bedou, M., Djossou, J., Bodjrenou, M., Yoboué,
V., and Liousse, C.: Profondeur optique des aérosols sur le sud de
l'Afrique de l'Ouest, soumis à ACPD, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Li, T.-C., Yuan, C.-S., Hung, C.-H., Lin, H.-Y., Huang, H.-C., and Lee,
C.-L.: Chemical Characteristics of Marine Fine Aerosols over Sea and at
Offshore Islands during Three Cruise Sampling Campaigns in the Taiwan
Strait-Sea Salts and Anthropogenic Particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,
1–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-384" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-384</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Schwandner, F. M., Sewell, H. J., Zivkovich, A., Tigges, M., Raja,
S., Holcomb, S., Molenar, J. V., Sherman, L., Archuleta, C., Lee, T., and
Collett, J. L.: Observations of ammonia, nitric acid and fine particles in a
rural gas production region, Atmos. Environ., 83, 80–89,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.007</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Liang, L., Engling, G., Du, Z., Cheng, Y., Duan, F., Liu, X., and He, K.:
Seasonal variations and source estimation of saccharides in atmospheric
particulate matter in Beijing, China, Chemosphere, 150, 365–377, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Liousse, C., Assamoi, E., Criqui, P., Granier, C., and Rosset, R.: Explosive
growth in African combustion emissions from 2005 to 2030, Environ. Res.
Lett., 9, 035003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Lonati, G., Ozgen, S., and Giugliano, M.: Primary and secondary carbonaceous
species in PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples in Milan (Italy), Atmos. Environ.,
41, 4599–4610, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.046</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Lowenthal, D., Zielinska, B., Samburova, V., Collins, D., Taylor, N., and
Kumar, N.: Evaluation of assumptions for estimating chemical light
extinction at U.S. national parks, J. Air   Waste Manag.
Assoc., 65, 249–260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2014.986307" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2014.986307</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Mason, B. and Moore, B. C.: Principles of Geochemistry, 4th Edn., John Wiley
and Sons, New York,  46–47, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Minguillón, M. C., Cirach, M., Hoek, G., Brunekreef, B., Tsai, M., de
Hoogh, K., Jedynska, A., Kooter, I. M., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., and Querol, X.:
Spatial variability of trace elements and sources for improved exposure
assessment in Barcelona, Atmos. Environ., 89, 268–281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.047</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Mkoma, S. L.: Physico-Chemical characterisation of atmospheric aerosols in
Tanzania, with emphasis on the carbonaceous aerosol components and on
chemical mass closure, PhD, Ghent University, Ghent, Belguim, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Mmari, A. G., Potgieter-Vermaak, S. S., Bencs, L., McCrindle, R. I., and Van
Grieken, R.: Elemental and ionic components of atmospheric aerosols and
associated gaseous pollutants in and near Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,
Atmos. Environ., 77, 51–61, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.061</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
MMEH (Ministère des Mines de l'Energie et d'Hydraulique): Tableau de
bord de l'Energie 2002 au Bénin, Direction Générale de
l'Energie, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Ngo, N. S., Asseko, S. V. J., Ebanega, M. O., Allo'o Allo'o, S. M., and
Hystad, P.: The relationship among PM<sub>2.5</sub>, traffic emissions, and
socioeconomic status: Evidence from Gabon using low-cost, portable air
quality monitors, Transport. Res. Pt. D,
68, 2–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.029</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Ozer, P.: Estimation de la pollution particulaire naturelle de l'air en 2003
à Niamey (Niger) à partir de données de visibilité
horizontale, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Pachauri, T., Singla, V., Satsangi, A., Lakhani, A., and Kumari, K. M.:
Characterization of carbonaceous aerosols with special reference to episodic
events at Agra, India, Atmos. Res., 128, 98–110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.03.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.03.010</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Park, J. H., Mudunkotuwa, I. A., Mines, L. W. D., Anthony, T. R., Grassian,
V. H., and Peters, T. M.: A Granular Bed for Use in a Nanoparticle
Respiratory Deposition Sampler, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 49,
179–187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1013521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1013521</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Person, A. and Tymen, G.: Mesurage des particules en suspension dans l'air
en relation avec la santé, Pollution atmosphèrique, 271–285, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Pipal, A. S., Jan, R., Satsangi, P. G., Tiwari, S., and Taneja, A.: Study of
Surface Morphology, Elemental Composition and Origin of Atmospheric Aerosols
(PM<sub>2.5</sub>  and PM<sub>10</sub>) over Agra, India, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 14,
1685–1700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.01.0017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.01.0017</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Pipal, A. S., Singh, S., and Satsangi, G. P.: Study on bulk to single
particle analysis of atmospheric aerosols at urban region, Urban Clim.,
27, 243–258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2018.12.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2018.12.008</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M., Ginoux, P., Torres, O., Nicholson, S. E., and Gill, T. E.:
Environmental characterization of global sources of atmospheric soil dust
identified with the NIMBUS 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS)
absorbing aerosol product, Rev. Geophys., 40, 1002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000RG000095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000RG000095</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, Y., Chan, C. K., and Chan, L. Y.: Characteristics of chemical
compositions of atmospheric aerosols in Hong Kong: spatial and seasonal
distributions, Sci. Total Environ., 206, 25–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00214-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00214-3</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Ramgolam, K., Favez, O., Cachier, H., Gaudichet, A., Marano, F., Martinon, L., and
Baeza-Squiban, A.: Size-partitioning of an urban aerosol to identify particle
determinants involved in the proinflammatory response induced in airway
epithelial cells, Part Fibre Toxicol., 6, 10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-6-10" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-6-10</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Rengarajan, R., Sudheer, A. K., and Sarin, M. M.: Aerosol acidity and
secondary organic aerosol formation during wintertime over urban environment
in western India, Atmos. Environ., 45, 1940–1945, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.026</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Samara, C., Kouimtzis, T., Tsitouridou, R., Kanias, G., and Simeonov, V.:
Chemical mass balance source apportionment of PM<sub>10</sub> in an industrialized
urban area of Northern Greece, Atmos. Environ., 37, 41–54,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00772-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00772-0</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Satsangi, A., Pachauri, T., Singla, V., Lakhani, A., and Kumari, K. M.:
Organic and elemental carbon aerosols at a suburban site, Atmos.
Res., 113, 13–21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.04.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.04.012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Saxena, P. and Hildemann, L. M.: Water-soluble organics in atmospheric
particles: a critical review of the literature and application of
thermodynamics to identify candidate compounds, J. Atmos. Chem., 24,
57–109, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Sciare, J., Oikonomou, K., Cachier, H., Mihalopoulos, N., Andreae, M. O.,
Maenhaut, W., and Sarda-Estève, R.: Aerosol mass closure and
reconstruction of the light scattering coefficient over the Eastern
Mediterranean Sea during the MINOS campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5,
2253–2265, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2253-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2253-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: from
Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Sempére, R. and Kawamura, K.: Comparative distributions of dicarboxylic acids and related polar compounds in snow, rain and aerosols from urban atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 28, 449–459, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90123-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90123-6</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Shahsavani, A., Naddafi, K., Jaafarzadeh Haghighifard, N., Mesdaghinia, A.,
Yunesian, M., Nabizadeh, R., Arhami, M., Yarahmadi, M., Sowlat, M. H.,
Ghani, M., Jonidi Jafari, A., Alimohamadi, M., Motevalian, S. A., and
Soleimani, Z.: Characterization of ionic composition of TSP and PM<sub>10</sub> during
the Middle Eastern Dust (MED) storms in Ahvaz, Iran, Environ. Monit. Assess.,
184, 6683–6692, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2451-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2451-6</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Stone, R. S., Herber, A., Vitale, V., Mazzola, M., Lupi, A., Schnell, R. C.,
Dutton, E. G., Liu, P. S. K., Li, S.-M., Dethloff, K., Lampert, A., Ritter,
C., Stock, M., Neuber, R., and Maturilli, M.: A three-dimensional
characterization of Arctic aerosols from airborne Sun photometer
observations: PAM-ARCMIP, April 2009, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D13203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013605" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013605</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., Clements, A. L., Turner, J. R., Bae, M. S.,
and Schauer, J. J.: A method for on-line measurement of water-soluble
organic carbon in ambient aerosol particles: Results from an urban site:
on-line measurement of WSOC in aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L13105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019681" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019681</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Zhuang, G., Wang, Y., Han, L., Guo, J., Dan, M., Zhang, W., Wang,
Z., and Hao, Z.: The airborne particulate pollution in Beijing –
concentration, composition, distribution and sources, Atmos.
Environ., 38, 5991–6004, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.07.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.07.009</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, X., Zhang, X., Ci, Z., Guo, J., and Wang, J.: Speciation of the major
inorganic salts in atmospheric aerosols of Beijing, China: Measurements and
comparison with model, Atmos. Environ., 133, 123–134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.013</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Tapsoba, D.: Caractérisation événementielle des régimes
pluviométriques ouestafricains et de leur récent changement,
Thèse de Doctorat, Univ. Paris-XI (Orsay), 100 pp., 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, S. R.: Abundance of chemical elements in the continental crust: a
new table, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 28, 1273–1285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(64)90129-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(64)90129-2</a>, 1964.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Terzi, E., Argyropoulos, G., Bougatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., Nikolaou, K.,
and Samara, C.: Chemical composition and mass closure of ambient PM<sub>10</sub> at
urban sites, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2231–2239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.019</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Tunno, B., Longley, I., Somervell, E., Edwards, S., Olivares, G., Gray, S.,
Cambal, L., Chubb, L., Roper, C., Coulson, G., and Clougherty, J. E.:
Separating spatial patterns in pollution attributable to woodsmoke and other
sources, during daytime and nighttime hours, in Christchurch, New Zealand,
Environ. Res., 171, 228–238, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.033</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Turpin, B. J., Cary, R. A., and Huntzicker, J. J.: An In Situ, Time-Resolved
Analyzer for Aerosol Organic and Elemental Carbon, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 12, 161–171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829008959336" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829008959336</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population
Division (2019), World Population Prospects 2019, Vol. II: Demographic
Profiles, Made available under a Creative Commons license, available at:
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 25 March 2020), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Val, S., Liousse, C., Doumbia, E. H. T., Galy-Lacaux, C., Cachier, H.,
Marchand, N., Badel, A., Gardrat, E., Sylvestre, A., and Baeza-Squiban, A.:
Physico-chemical characterization of African urban aerosols (Bamako in Mali
and Dakar in Senegal) and their toxic effects in human bronchial epithelial
cells: description of a worrying situation, Part Fibre Toxicol., 10, 10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-10-10" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-10-10</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Viana, M., Maenhaut, W., ten Brink, H. M., Chi, X., Weijers, E., Querol, X.,
Alastuey, A., Mikuška, P., and Večeřa, Z.: Comparative analysis
of organic and elemental carbon concentrations in carbonaceous aerosols in
three European cities, Atmos. Environ., 41, 5972–5983, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.035</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Viana, M., López, J. M., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., García-Gacio,
D., Blanco-Heras, G., López-Mahía, P., Piñeiro-Iglesias, M.,
Sanz, M. J., Sanz, F., Chi, X., and Maenhaut, W.: Tracers and impact of open
burning of rice straw residues on PM in Eastern Spain, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 1941–1957, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.012</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Viidanoja, J., Sillanpää, M., Laakia, J., Kerminen, V.-M., Hillamo,
R., Aarnio, P., and Koskentalo, T.: Organic and black carbon in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and
PM<sub>10</sub>: 1 year of data from an urban site in Helsinki, Finland, Atmos.
Environ., 36, 3183–3193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00205-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00205-4</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Bi, X., Sheng, G., and Fu, J.: Chemical Composition and Sources of
PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub>  Aerosols in Guangzhou, China, Environ. Monit. Assess.,
119, 425–439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9034-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9034-3</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Washington, R., Todd, M., Middleton, N. J., and Goudie, A. S.: Dust-Storm
Source Areas Determined by the Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer and
Surface Observations, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr.,
93, 297–313, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.9302003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.9302003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, J. G. and Chow, J. C.: Estimating middle-, neighborhood-, and
urban-scale contributions to elemental carbon in Mexico City with a rapid
response aethalometer, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 51, 1522–1528, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., and Houck, J. E.: PM<sub>2.5</sub>  chemical source
profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and
coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995, Chemosphere, 43,
1141–1151, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00171-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00171-5</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
WHO (World Health Organization): 7 million premature deaths annually linked
to air pollution. Media Centre news release, Geneva: World Health
Organization, available at: <a href="http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-pollution/en/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 November 2018), 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, M. R., Lightbody, J. H., Donaldson, K., Sales, J., and Stone, V.:
Interactions between ultrafine particles and transition metals in vivo and
in vitro, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 184, 172–179, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Xiang, P., Zhou, X., Duan, J., Tan, J., He, K., Yuan, C., Ma, Y., and Zhang,
Y.: Chemical characteristics of water-soluble organic compounds (WSOC) in
PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Beijing, China: 2011–2012, Atmos. Res., 183, 104–112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.020</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, Y., Wang, Y., Bilal, M., and Dong, W.: Mapping daily PM<sub>2.5</sub> at 500&thinsp;m resolution over Beijing with improved hazy day performance, Sci.
Total Environ., 659, 410–418, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.365" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.365</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, H., Léon, J.-F., Liousse, C., Guinot, B., Yoboué, V., Akpo, A. B., Adon, J., Ho, K. F., Ho, S. S. H., Li, L., Gardrat, E., Shen, Z., and Cao, J.: Personal exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> emitted from typical anthropogenic sources in southern West Africa: chemical characteristics and associated health risks, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6637–6657, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6637-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6637-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, J., Zhang, Y., Zheng, S., and He, Y.: Aerosol effects on ozone
concentrations in Beijing: a model sensitivity study, J. Environ. Sci. (China),
24, 645–656, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, P., Froyd, K. D., Portmann, R. W., Toon, O. B., Freitas, S. R., Bardeen,
C. G., Katich, J. M., Schwarz, J. P., Williamson, C., Kupc, A., Brock, C.,
Liu, S., Gao, R.-S., Schill, G., Fan, T., Rosenlof, K. H., and Murphy, D.
M.: An improved treatment of aerosol convective transport and removal in a
chemistry-climate model, Geophys. Res. Lett., submitted, 2020.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Zghaid, M., Noack, Y., Bounakla, M., and Benyaich, F.: Pollution
atmosphérique particulaire dans la ville de Kenitra (Maroc), Pollution
atmosphérique [En ligne], no. 203, mis à jour le
12 October 2015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4267/pollution-atmospherique.1184" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4267/pollution-atmospherique.1184</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X. Y., Gong, S. L., Shen, Z. X., Mei, F. M., Xi, X. X., Liu, L.C.,
Zhou, Z. J., Wang, D., Wang, Y. Q., and Cheng, Y.: Characterization of soil
dust aerosol in China and its transport and distribution during 2001
ACE-Asia: 1. Network observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4261,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002632" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002632</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
