<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-20-3397-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Modeling stratospheric intrusion and trans-Pacific transport on
tropospheric ozone using hemispheric CMAQ during April 2010 <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> – Part 2: Examination of
emission impacts based on the <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>higher-order decoupled direct method</article-title><alt-title>Modeling stratospheric intrusion and trans-Pacific transport</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Modeling stratospheric intrusion and trans-Pacific transport}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S. Itahashi et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Itahashi</surname><given-names>Syuichi</given-names></name>
          <email>isyuichi@criepi.denken.or.jp</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7567-7831</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Mathur</surname><given-names>Rohit</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8927-5876</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Hogrefe</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3280-3513</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Napelenok</surname><given-names>Sergey L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Environmental Science Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric
Power Industry (CRIEPI),<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> 1646 Abiko, Abiko, Chiba 270–1194, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Computational Exposure
Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Office of Research and
Development, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences (MEAS), North
Carolina State University (NCSU),<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Campus Box 8208, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern
University, Boston, MA 02115, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Syuichi Itahashi (isyuichi@criepi.denken.or.jp)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>March</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>3397</fpage><lpage>3413</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>26</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>January</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 Syuichi Itahashi et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e147">The state-of-the-science Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling
system, which has recently been extended for hemispheric-scale modeling
applications (referred to as H-CMAQ), is applied to study the trans-Pacific
transport, a phenomenon recognized as a potential source of air pollution in
the US, during April 2010. The results of this analysis are presented in
two parts. In the previous paper (Part 1), model evaluation for tropospheric
ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was presented and an air mass characterization method was
developed. Results from applying this newly established method pointed to
the importance of emissions as the factor to enhance the surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratio over the US. In this subsequent paper (Part 2), emission impacts are
examined based on mathematically rigorous sensitivity analysis using the
higher-order decoupled direct method (HDDM) implemented in H-CMAQ. The HDDM
sensitivity coefficients indicate the presence of a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sensitive
regime during April 2010 over most of the Northern Hemisphere. By defining
emission source regions over the US and east Asia, impacts from these
emission sources are examined. At the surface, during April 2010, the
emission impacts of the US and east Asia are comparable over the western
US with a magnitude of about 3 ppbv impacts on monthly mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
all-hour basis, whereas the impact of domestic emissions dominates over the
eastern US with a magnitude of about 10 ppbv impacts on monthly mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The positive correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios and domestic emission impacts is confirmed. In contrast, the
relationship between surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios and emission impacts from
east Asia exhibits a flat slope when considering the entire US. However,
this relationship has strong regional differences between the western and
eastern US; the western region exhibits a positive correlation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.38), whereas the latter exhibits a flat slope (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Based on the comprehensive evaluation of H-CMAQ, we extend the sensitivity
analysis for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aloft. The results reveal the significant impacts of
emissions from east Asia on the free troposphere (defined as 750 to 250 hPa)
over the US (impacts of more than 5 ppbv) and the dominance of
stratospheric air mass on upper model layer (defined as 250 to 50 hPa) over
the US (impacts greater than 10 ppbv). Finally, we estimate changes of
trans-Pacific transport by taking into account recent emission trends from
2010 to 2015 assuming the same meteorological condition. The analysis
suggests that the impact of recent emission changes on changes in the
contribution of trans-Pacific transport to US <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels was
insignificant at the surface level and was small (less than 1 ppbv) over the free troposphere.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page3398?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e298">Tropospheric ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a secondary air pollutant produced through
photochemical reactions including nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) (Haagen-Smit and Fox, 1954). Tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
plays an important role by producing hydroxyl radicals (OH) which control
the oxidizing capacity (Logan, 1985). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the surface level poses
significant human health impacts; hence, many countries have an air quality
standard for its ambient mixing ratios. The National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the US is set on the annual fourth
highest maximum daily 8 h concentration (MD8O3) averaged over 3 years.
Its threshold value was set at 70 ppbv in 2015 (U.S. EPA, 2018). An analysis of
trends in surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observation during the periods of 1998 and 2013 in
the US indicated that the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios have been
decreasing in response to reductions in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor emissions (Simon et
al., 2015). Regarding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution in the US, sources enhancing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios are not limited to national emissions. One issue of
potential concern is the dramatic variation of anthropogenic emissions in
east Asia which has been recognized as an important source for the US
through previous research on trans-Pacific transport (e.g., Jacob et al.,
1999; Fiore et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2009, 2012; Lin et al., 2012a; Huang
et al., 2017; Guo et al., 2018; Jaffe et al., 2018).
Stratosphere–troposphere transport (STT) is another process affecting
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution (Lelieveld and Dentener, 2000). The fraction
of stratospheric origin on tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies by location and
season, is strongly dependent on the tropopause altitudes, and is an active
research area (e.g., Fiore et al., 2003; Lin et al., 2012b; Mathur et al.,
2017). Literature estimates of the contributions of these two factors are
summarized our previous study (see Table 1 of Itahashi et al., 2020; hereafter referred to as Part 1). The
occurrence of this trans-Pacific transport and stratospheric intrusion can
be related to the midlatitude jet stream, and this is controlled by La
Niña and El Niño. The springtime trans-Pacific transport may be
enhanced following an El Niño winter due to the eastward extension of
the atmospheric circulation over the Pacific North American sector and the
southward shift of the subtropical jet stream. The stratospheric intrusions
may be enhanced following a La Niña winter due to a meandering of the
jet stream (Lin et al., 2015). Because enhancement of trans-Pacific
transport is expected after the 2009–2010 El Niño winter, April 2010 is
selected as the study period in the current analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e435">As illustrated in the Part 1 paper, the objective of this sequential
research is to better understand the relative contributions of precursor
emissions from the US and east Asia and also the impacts of STT on air
quality in the US during springtime. To quantify these contributions,
we used the model of Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) version 5.2
applied for hemispheric-scale analysis (H-CMAQ) (Mathur et al., 2017). The
current study extends  Part 1. A brief summary of the findings from that
analysis and the motivation for this study is presented subsequently.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Summary of Part 1 and motivation for Part 2</title>
      <p id="d1e446">The model of H-CMAQ was configured with a horizontal grid spacing of 108 km
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grids to cover the entire Northern Hemisphere on 44
terrain-following vertical layers from the surface to 50 hPa (Mathur et al.,
2017). The emission inputs are based on the modeling experiments of
Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution version 2 (HTAP2), and the
description of this emission dataset can be found in relevant studies
(Janssens-Maenhout et al., 2015; Pouliot et al., 2015; Galmarini et al.,
2017; Hogrefe et al., 2018). For gas-phase and aerosol chemistry
representation, cb05e51 and aero6 with nonvolatile primary organic aerosol
(POA) were used, respectively (Simon and Bhave, 2012; Appel et al., 2017),
and further included a condensed representation of halogen chemistry which
relates to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss in maritime environments (Sarwar et al., 2015). In
terms of the stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> behavior, a robust indicator to
distinguish between stratospheric and tropospheric air masses is potential
vorticity (PV). A value of 2 PVU (1 PVU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
is suggested as the identification of stratospheric air
(e.g., Hoskins et al., 1985). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios and PV are correlated,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios are used in H-CMAQ to specify the model top <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratio. Starting with H-CMAQ version 5.2, a dynamic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
function has been implemented to account for the seasonal, latitudinal, and
altitude dependencies of this relationship (Xing et al., 2016). The H-CMAQ
simulation in this study started from 1 March 2010 and was initialized by
three-dimensional chemical fields from prior model simulations for 2010,
described in Hogrefe et al. (2018); March was discarded as a spin-up period
and April was selected as an analysis period.</p>
      <p id="d1e585">To evaluate the performance of H-CMAQ simulations, the Part 1 paper computed
Pearson's correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test for the
statistical significance level, the normalized mean bias (NMB), and the
normalized mean error (NME) (e.g., Emery et al., 2017). The analysis of ground-based mixing ratios
included observations at 52 sites of the World Data Centre for Greenhouse
Gases (WDCGG) over the Northern Hemisphere (WDCGG, 2018), 9 sites of the
Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia (EANET) over Japan (EANET,
2018), and 81 sites of the Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET)
over the US (CASTNET, 2018). Based on more than 4000 observation–model
pairs of MD8O3, the results of this analysis showed good model performance,
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> around 0.5–0.6, NMBs around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>%, and NMEs around 10 %–20 %. In
addition to this ground-based analysis, vertical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles were
evaluated for three vertical layer ranges: from the surface to approximately
750 hPa (i.e., boundary layer), approximately 750–250 hPa (i.e., free
troposphere), and approximately<?pagebreak page3399?> 250–50 hPa (i.e., upper model layers)
following the previous work of Hogrefe et al. (2018). Comparisons of the
vertical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile with ozonesonde (WOUDC, 2020; NOAA, ESRL and GMD, 2018a) and airplane (NOAA, ESRL and GMD, 2018b) observations revealed that H-CMAQ
can capture <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> behavior well over the boundary layer. However,
systematic underestimations by H-CMAQ over free troposphere were found with
NMBs up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>%, especially during strong STT events. Comparisons of
modeled tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns with observed satellite data (NASA and GSFC,
2018) indicate that H-CMAQ can generally capture the Northern Hemisphere
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column distributions with lower column amounts over the
Pacific Ocean near the Equator and higher column amounts over the
midlatitudes.</p>
      <p id="d1e685">For the estimation of STT, a air mass characterization technique was newly
developed. This was derived based on the ratio of modeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios and a those of inert tracer for stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to judge the
relative importance of photochemistry and then determine whether an air mass
is of stratospheric origin if the photochemistry is weak. The estimated STT
showed day-to-day variations both in the impact magnitude and the air mass
origin. The relationship between surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels and estimated
stratospheric air mass in the troposphere showed a negative slope,
indicating that high surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios at most locations were
driven by other factors (e.g., emissions). In contrast, the relationship at
elevated sites exhibits a slight positive slope, indicating a steady STT
contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels.</p>
      <p id="d1e743">Because high surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were determined to be caused by
emissions, this subsequent paper (Part 2) focuses on the analysis of emission
impacts from the US and east Asia. To examine these emission impacts,
the traditional brute force method (BFM) approach of varying input
parameters (e.g., emission) one at a time is frequently used (e.g., Clappier
et al., 2017). The application of the decoupled direct method (DDM) in
H-CMAQ has been initiated to investigate the trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution
(Mathur et al., 2018a). In this study, we use the higher-order decoupled
direct method (HDDM) implemented in H-CMAQ, which enables accurate and
computationally efficient calculations of the sensitivity coefficients
required for evaluation of the impact of input parameters variations on
output chemical concentrations (Hakami et al., 2003, 2004; Cohan et al., 2005;
Napelenok et al., 2008, 2011; Kim et al., 2009; Itahashi
et al., 2013, 2015). The paper is organized as
follows. The HDDM is described in Sect. 3. Analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity
regimes over the entire Northern Hemisphere is presented in Sect. 4.1. By
defining source regions over the US and east Asia, the impacts of
emissions from these regions on surface-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the US are
examined in Sect. 4.2. We then extend the analysis to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aloft and
present the results in Sect. 4.3. Trans-Pacific transport may have changed
due to recent emission changes in east Asia, and the effects of these
changes are estimated by considering the emission changes after 2010. This
is discussed in Sect. 4.4. Finally, Sect. 5 summarizes the conclusions
of our sequential papers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Description of HDDM</title>
      <p id="d1e809">Response of chemical concentrations to perturbations in model parameters
(e.g., emissions, initial condition, boundary condition, reaction rate
constants) can be investigated through sensitivity analysis. A
perturbed sensitivity parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, has the following relationship
with the unperturbed sensitivity parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in the base-case
simulation:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M58" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a scaling factor with a nominal value of 1,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a perturbed scaling factor (e.g.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 0 and then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for zero emission simulation). Here, the response of a chemical
concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, against the perturbations in a sensitivity parameter,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is defined as the sensitivity coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The semi-normalized
first- and second-order sensitivity coefficients, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are defined as follows:

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M69" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are unitless,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have the same units as the chemical
concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Physically, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the impact of one
variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measures how a
first-order sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes under the changes of
another variable, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and can be used to explore the nonlinearities in a
system. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the local curvature of the
relationships between concentration and one parameter. HDDM calculates
semi-normalized <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>first-<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> and second-order sensitivity coefficients
simultaneously in a single model simulation based on a governing set of
sensitivity equations which have a formulation analogous to the atmospheric
species equations in the CMAQ modeling system.</p>
      <p id="d1e1461">To project the fractional perturbation from the base-case simulation, the
corresponding concentration can be approximated by a Taylor series expansion
of the sensitivity coefficient:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M83" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" columnspacing="1em" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">!</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">!</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is concentration in the base-case simulation, and the
higher-order terms greater than third order were summarized into  higher order terms (h.o.t.). The
zero-out contribution (ZOC) is defined as the difference between the
base-case simulation and the concentration that would occur if<?pagebreak page3400?> the
sensitivity parameter did not exist (Cohan et al., 2005). It is derived as
follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M85" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ZOC</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
        Throughout this study, we investigate the emission impacts based on this ZOC
formulation in Eq. (5). The emissions of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor species
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs; hereafter
simply referred to as VOCs) are used as sensitivity parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).
For example, the expression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the first-order
sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission.</p>
      <p id="d1e1927">In addition, DDM was extended to examine the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios towards stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A dynamic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> function
considering the seasonal, latitudinal, and altitude dependencies is
constructed at three vertical levels of 58, 76, and 95 hPa fitted as a
fifth-order polynomial function, and applicable in the range between
50 and 100 hPa (Xing et al., 2016). The sensitivity to this stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
calculated by differentiating the equations used to introduce stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through potential vorticity in the same matter as all other DDM
sensitivity calculations. When a user specifies the desire to know the PV
sensitivity, a sensitivity field corresponding to the calculation is
initialized at the beginning of the model run and then updated with the
derivatives in each time step and location where PV calculations occur
(typically the uppermost two layers in the model).  Since PV ozone in CMAQ
is essentially a “replacement” of the ozone field in the top layers before
the PV calculations by a scaling function, the same replacement is applied
to the first-order sensitivity field. Note that the higher-order sensitivity
to this stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not calculated. This sensitivity is
hereafter referred to as O3VORT. Moreover, to examine the effect of initial
and boundary condition in H-CMAQ modeling system, we also calculated the
sensitivities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to initial and boundary conditions, and these
sensitivities are hereafter referred to as O3IC and O3BC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and discussion of sensitivity analysis by HDDM</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Sensitivity regime in April 2010</title>
      <p id="d1e2027">Sensitivity coefficients towards domain-wide emissions (i.e., emissions
across the entire simulation domain) calculated by HDDM are shown in Fig. 1;
these values represent monthly means and in turn are computed from hourly
sensitivity coefficient output by the CMAQ model configured with HDDM.
Generally, the response of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions exhibits positive
first-order sensitivities (Fig. 1a) and negative second-order
sensitivities (Fig. 1c) because of the concave response of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. Exceptions are found over eastern China to the Korean
Peninsula, some parts of Europe, and some cities in the western US
(e.g., Seattle, San Francisco, and Los Angeles), around the Great Lakes, and
the northeastern US (e.g., New England region). These regions show
negative first-order sensitivity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions due to the NO
titration effect by dense <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission sources. Note that due to the
use of a coarse horizontal grid resolution to cover the entire Northern
Hemisphere, the simulation may not adequately capture the chemical regime in
urban areas where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry is VOC sensitive. The values of
sensitivity coefficients to VOC emissions (Fig. 1b and d) are small
compared to those to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. In addition, the second-order
sensitivity coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to VOC emissions are also smaller,
indicating that the nonlinear response of large-scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions
to VOC emissions is negligible. A positive second-order cross sensitivity of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to domain-wide <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC emissions (Fig. 1e) demonstrates
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will become less responsive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions with a concurrent
reduction of VOC emissions, and vice versa. While these sensitivities were
calculated towards total (i.e., both anthropogenic and biogenic) emissions,
the main interest from a policy-making perspective is on the sensitivities
towards anthropogenic emissions. To estimate these sensitivities, we
recalculated sensitivity coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to isoprene emissions as a
proxy for biogenic emissions (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). By comparing these sensitivities to
isoprene emissions (Fig. S1) to the sensitivities towards all emissions
(Fig. 1), it can be concluded that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is more sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions than to biogenic VOC emissions during April 2010. It should be
also noted that the positive first-order and negative second-order
sensitivities to VOC found near the lateral boundary with ring shape in the
modeling domain could be the perimeter sensitivity. In this H-CMAQ modeling
system, the boundary conditions are taken from the clean tropospheric
background values with updates to the physical and chemical sinks for
organic nitrate species (Mathur et al., 2017). For these boundary
conditions, the NO concentration was set to zero,  the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
was set to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppmv, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was set to 30 ppbv.
These low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> boundary conditions likely caused the perimeter
sensitivities to VOC, although it should also be noted that the absolute
values of these sensitivities are small. The effect of boundary conditions
is further discussed later in Sect. 4.3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2269">Spatial distribution of the sensitivity coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
domain-wide emissions. <bold>(a)</bold> First-order sensitivity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions,
<bold>(b)</bold> first-order sensitivity to VOC emissions, panel <bold>(c)</bold> is the same as <bold>(a)</bold> but
second order, panel <bold>(d)</bold> is the same as <bold>(b)</bold> but second order, and <bold>(e)</bold> second-order
sensitivity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC emissions during April 2010. The
sensitivity coefficients are monthly means computed from all hourly data on
April 2010.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2333">Determining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity regime can provide useful information to
policy makers designing emission reduction strategies by clarifying the
relative importance of precursor emissions. Based on the relationships
between the sensitivity coefficients, we determined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sensitivity
regimes from threshold values revised from previous studies (Wang et al.,
2011; Itahashi et al., 2013) as follows.

                <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math id="M126" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mtext>VOC  sensitive</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sensitive</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

           <?pagebreak page3401?> Grid cells meeting neither of these two criteria are considered to be in a
transition regime. This classification is applied to all hourly HDDM results
during April 2010 and then averaged. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sensitivity regimes
obtained through this analysis are shown in Fig. 2. The shading of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(purple) or VOC sensitive (green) indicates the high frequency of occurrence
of sensitivity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or VOC regime. As already suggested by the
relative magnitudes of the sensitivity coefficients towards <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
VOC emissions shown in Fig. 1, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during April 2010 is in a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sensitive regime over the midlatitude Northern Hemisphere with the
exception over the locations that had negative first-order sensitivity to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission and were classified as VOC sensitive. Therefore, controls
on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions can be an effective way to reduce surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
across almost the entire Northern Hemisphere but it may cause an increase of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios over eastern China and some areas in Europe and the
US. Due to the coarse grid resolution, H-CMAQ could partly missed the
VOC-sensitive regime characterized over urban areas, and our previous study
reported the dependency of photochemical indicators to judge the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
regime (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) on model grid resolution
(Zhang et al., 2009). Through the analysis of HDDM results for domain-wide
emissions, this section provided an overview of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivities and
the response of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to precursor emissions over the Northern Hemisphere.
The following section further investigates the sensitivity of surface
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the US by defining different emission source regions over
the US and east Asia.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2690">Spatial distributions of the ozone-sensitive regime during
April 2010.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=128.037402pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3402?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Emission impacts from the US and east Asia at surface level</title>
      <p id="d1e2709">To investigate the emission impacts from the US and east Asia, we
defined two source regions as shown in Fig. 3a. In this study, east Asia
includes China, Taiwan, Mongolia, the Korean Peninsula (North and South
Korea), and Japan. We conducted additional HDDM simulations using these two
source regions and then calculated their sensitivity coefficients, which are
shown in Figs. S2 and S3. The sensitivities
from other regions except the US and east Asia are illustrated in Fig. S4. Based on these sensitivity coefficients, ZOCs
of emissions from the US and east Asia are derived according to Eq. (5)
and the resulting emission impacts are shown in Fig. 3b and c. The ZOCs of emissions
from the US show more than 10 ppbv over the southeastern US and
relatively small impacts around 2–8 ppbv in the western US. In some areas
over the US that are characterized by a weak VOC-sensitive regime in
Fig. 2 (e.g., Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, around the Great Lakes,
and New England regions), emissions from the US have small negative
impacts. The US emission impacts extend to the Atlantic Ocean with
impacts of more than 2 ppbv, which are comparable to those found over the
western US, and then decrease over Africa. The ZOC of emissions from
east Asia also shows positive impacts greater than 10 ppbv over China,
Taiwan, Japan, and the western Pacific Ocean, with the exception of negative
impacts over eastern China. These negative impacts indicate that the
elimination of emissions can lead to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase, because NO titration
works to reduce the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio over these areas, which have a high
emission density. The analysis of the ZOC from east Asian emissions clearly
illustrates the presence of trans-Pacific transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
transport on a monthly mean basis is estimated to be more than 2 ppbv over
almost the entire Pacific Ocean and reaches many parts of North America,
i.e., almost the entire US and Canada and western Mexico.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2747"><bold>(a)</bold> Source regions of the US and east Asia, and zero-out
contribution of emissions from the <bold>(b)</bold> US and <bold>(c)</bold> east Asia during
April 2010. East Asia is defined as China, Taiwan, Mongolia, the Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, and Japan.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2764">Detailed analyses of these impacts over the US are conducted by focusing
on longitudinal differences. In this study, we use four time zones of
Pacific, Mountain, Central, and Eastern Standard Time (abbreviated as PST,
MST, CST, and EST, respectively) in the US and investigate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratio and ZOC of emission from the US and east Asia in these zones.
Results for monthly and daily means are shown in Fig. 4. Consistent with previous studies (e.g., Simon et al., 2015),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios have a longitudinal gradient with lower values in the
west and higher values in the east (modeled monthly mean concentrations are
35.8, 39.3, 39.1, and 40.6 ppbv over PST, MST, CST, and EST, respectively). The results of the ZOC analysis reveal varying impacts from
US and east Asian emissions across the four regions. For the US on a
monthly mean domain-wide basis, the impact of domestic emissions surpasses
that of east Asian emissions. Over the PST region, the monthly averaged
impact of domestic emissions is 3.2 ppbv, while that of east Asian emissions
is 2.8 ppbv; i.e., the impacts from both source regions over the PST zone
are comparable. It should be noted that the daily averaged impact of east
Asian emissions can exceed that of US emissions on some days (e.g., in
early April and during 27–30 April), suggesting the significant role of
episodic trans-Pacific transport on air quality over the western US. In
contrast to the situation over the PST zone, the impact from domestic
emissions always clearly exceeds the impact from east Asian emissions in the
MST, CST, and EST zones; this feature strengthens towards the east. For
example, the temporal variations of daily averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios and
the impacts of domestic emissions are well correlated over the EST zone. The
impact of east Asian emissions is small compared to that of US emissions
over the CST and EST zones, but it is not negligible. These impacts are 2.1 ppbv
on a monthly average basis (ranging between 1.2  and 3.0 ppbv on a
daily basis) over CST and 1.9 ppbv on a monthly average basis (ranging
between 1.2 and 2.8 ppbv on a daily basis) over EST through April 2010.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2804">Summary of the correlation between modeled MD8O3 and the zero-out
contribution of emissions from the US and east Asia.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Emission impacts</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Emission impacts</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">from the US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">from east Asia</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All CASTNET sites</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2286</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.63<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Pacific Standard Time (PST)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">238</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.52<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Mountain Standard Time (MST)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">359</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Central Standard Time (CST)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">489</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Eastern Standard Time (EST)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.64<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Elevated CASTNET sites</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">587</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.52<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2807">Note: significance levels by Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test for correlation coefficients
between observations and simulations are marked as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and lack of a mark indicates no
significance.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3157">Daily and monthly averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio (left axis; black
circles and thick lines) and zero-out contribution from the US and east Asia
(right axis; light blue and light red bars, respectively) summarized over
four time zones of Pacific, Mountain, Central, and Eastern Standard Time
(PST, MST, CST, and EST) in the US. The units of the left and right axes are ppbv.
On a monthly average basis (center panel), whiskers indicates daily minimum and
maximum. Note that the axis of zero-out contributions is different in the left
(PST and MST) and right panels (CST and EST).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3177">To illuminate the relationship between surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio and
impacts from US and east Asian emissions, in Fig. 5, scatter plots were
constructed using model-derived estimates at all CASTNET sites and at
elevated CASTNET sites only (refer to Fig. 10 of Itahashi et al., 2020). The
statistical analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and its significance
level by Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test between surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio and these
impacts by emissions is listed in Table 1. At all CASTNET sites, the
relationship between the modeled MD8O3 and the impact of emissions from the
US shows a positive slope with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.63 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, confirming
that domestic emissions are generally the cause of high surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratios. On the other hand, the relationship between modeled MD8O3 and
the impact of emissions from east Asia is flat, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and no
significance, suggesting that constant impacts are found in the US but
do not directly relate to high surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios. A noticeable
result is that the relationship varies across the regions. Each point in the
scatter plots is shaded by time zone, and it can be seen that high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratios over the CST and EST zones (darker black in Fig. 5c) are
not linked to the impacts of east Asian emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>  of 0.06 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, and not significant), while moderately higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios found over PST and MST (lighter black in Fig. 5c) appear to be
linked to higher impacts from east Asian emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were 0.36 and 0.36,
respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These analyses are repeated using data
from sites with an elevation higher than 1000 m (see Table S1 in the Supplement).
At this subset of stations, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio
shows a positive relationship with emissions from both the US (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.52
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and east Asia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.22 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
This might be partly because most of the elevated CASTNET sites are located
in the western US (17 of 21 elevated sites are located in the PST or MST
zones). Since long-range transport occurs aloft and since changes in
pollutant concentrations influence their ground-level values (e.g., Mathur
et al., 2018b), in the next section, we specifically<?pagebreak page3403?> investigate the impacts
of emissions from different source regions on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aloft.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3405">Relationship between modeled MD8O3 at the surface and
zero-out contribution of emissions from <bold>(a, b)</bold> the US and <bold>(c, d)</bold> east Asia.
The points are shaded by four time zones in the US: <bold>(a, c)</bold> all CASTNET sites
and <bold>(b, d)</bold> elevated CASTNET sites defined as having an elevation greater
than 1000 m (see also Table S1).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Emission impacts on {$\protect\chem{O_{3}}$} aloft}?><title>Emission impacts on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aloft</title>
      <p id="d1e3446">In this section, we focus on the impacts of US and east Asian emissions
on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions through the troposphere over the US. Monthly
averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios and ZOCs of emissions from the US and east
Asia at different altitudes in the free troposphere are shown in Fig. 6. As
the reference, monthly averaged ZOCs of domain-wide emissions at different
altitudes at surface and in the free troposphere are shown in Fig. S5. Throughout this study, we define the free troposphere
as ranging from 750 to 250 hPa and refer to pressure levels of 750, 500,
and 250 hPa as the bottom, middle, and top of the free troposphere,
respectively. The results of this analysis are also summarized in Table 2.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios are larger over continents from the surface to 750 hPa
(i.e., boundary layer) but are more dispersed over midlatitudes to high latitudes at
500 and 250 hPa (Fig. 6). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios at the surface exhibit a
longitudinal gradient with lower values over the western US and higher
values over the eastern US, and the same gradient is seen at 750 hPa.
However, there are no longitudinal gradients at 500 hPa with 54 ppbv over
the entire US, and a reversed longitudinal gradient with western highs
and eastern lows is found at 250 hPa (Table 2).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3495">Monthly averaged <bold>(a–c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and zero-out
contribution from the <bold>(d–f)</bold> US and east <bold>(g–i)</bold> Asia at the bottom of
free troposphere (750 hPa; <bold>a, d, g</bold>), middle of free troposphere (500 hPa; <bold>b, e, h</bold>), and top of free troposphere (250 hPa; <bold>c, f, i</bold>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3538">Summary of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and zero-out contribution of
emissions from the US and east Asia, and sensitivity of O3VORT over four
time zones in the US during April 2010.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Emission</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Emission</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Impacts</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">concentration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">impacts</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">impacts</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">by stratospheric</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">from the US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">from east Asia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">intrusion</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pacific Standard Time (PST)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Surface</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Bottom of free troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">47.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Middle of free troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">54.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Top of free troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">108.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mountain Standard Time (MST)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–  Surface</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">39.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–  Bottom of free troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Middle of free troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">54.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Top of free troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">119.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Central Standard Time (CST)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Surface</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">39.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Bottom of free troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Middle of free troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">53.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Top of free troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">79.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Eastern Standard Time (EST)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Surface</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Bottom of free troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">52.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Middle of free troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">53.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">– Top of free troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">78.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3552">Note: all units are ppbv.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page3405?><p id="d1e3983">Once <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is lofted to free troposphere, its sinks are not effective, and
consequently it can be transported further. For ZOC of US emissions, the
largest contribution is found over the southeast US at 750 hPa but the
impacts of US emissions stretch far across the Atlantic to Europe, north
Africa, Eurasia, and even Japan with values above 2 ppbv. Areas where the
impact of US emissions exceeds 2 ppbv are shown over the entire Northern
Hemisphere at 500 and 250 hPa (Fig. 6). It should also be noted that the
impacts of US emissions on the US remained constant or declined with
increasing altitude. In particular, constant impacts from US emissions
with increasing altitude are found over the PST zone, whereas decreasing
impacts are found over the MST, CST, and EST zones. From the middle to the
top of the free troposphere, the impacts of US emissions on the US are
around 2–3 ppbv (Table 2). For ZOC of east Asian emissions, extended impacts
on the US when increasing altitude are shown (Fig. 6). At 750 hPa, the
impacts are found over the entire Pacific Ocean with more than 10 ppbv
around Hawaii and contribution as high as 4–8 ppbv over the entire US. At
500 hPa, its impacts are smaller over the Pacific Ocean with less than 8 ppbv;
however, the impacts are above 6 ppbv almost across the entire US,
surpassing the impacts found at 750 hPa. At 250 hPa, the impacts are
slightly decreased beyond the US but stretch across a broader range
to Europe and western Russia (Fig. 6). It is shown that the impacts of east
Asian emissions are around 5 ppbv or more over the entire free troposphere
over the US (Table 2). From the middle to the top of the free troposphere,
the impacts of emissions from east Asia are twice or more those of US
emissions over the eastern and western US, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e3997">In characterizing the dominant sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aloft, the role of
stratospheric air masses also needs to be considered. In our Part 1 paper,
we developed an air mass characterization technique, but it was limited to
estimate the air mass burden on column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this Part 2 paper, to
unify the methodology investigating sensitivities to model parameters, the
sensitivity towards <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> specification near the tropopause based on a
potential vorticity scaling, hereafter referred to as O3VORT, is directly
calculated. The results of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity towards O3VORT are
shown in Fig. 7 at the surface, 750, 500, and 250 hPa with different
color scales. Not surprisingly, the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to O3VORT shows
increasing values with increasing altitude. At the surface level and on a
monthly averaged timescale, the impact of STT is less than 1 ppbv, except
over the Tibetan Plateau because of its elevation. In other regions, smaller
impacts of STT are noted over the western US and north Africa; the
former is due to the high elevation of the Rocky Mountains, whereas the latter
may be related to active convection. Impacts of STT
exceeding 1 ppbv are found over midlatitudes areas at 750 hPa, and stronger
impacts exceeding 5 ppbv are found at 500 hPa. At 250 hPa, the impacts of
STT are shifted towards high latitudes and exceed 25 ppbv, reflective of the
lower tropopause height at higher latitudes (Fig. 7). Over the US, the
monthly averaged impacts of STT are below 1 ppbv at the surface and 750 hPa
and increase from around 2 ppbv at 500 hPa to more than 10 ppbv at 250 hPa
(Table 2). At 250 hPa, the impacts of STT range from more than 20 ppbv in
the west and a low of around 10 ppbv in the east; therefore, these
differences partly account for the longitudinal gradient of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratio modeled at the top of free troposphere.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4069">Monthly averaged sensitivity of O3VORT at <bold>(a)</bold> surface, <bold>(b)</bold> bottom of free
troposphere (750 hPa), <bold>(c)</bold> middle of free troposphere (500 hPa), and <bold>(d)</bold> top of free
troposphere (250 hPa).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4090">Note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration fields and the sum of sensitivities do not
generally equal each other because of nonlinearities in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation.
Moreover, the zero-out contributions for US and east Asian emissions
represent only a portion of the total emissions burden, and the emissions'
sensitivity calculations can also be affected by initial and boundary
conditions. To investigate this further, the temporal evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations and sensitivities towards O3VORT, O3IC, O3BC, and domain-wide
emissions' ZOC are presented in Figs. S6–S9. The figures show time series of
these contributions averaged over the PST, MST, CST, and EST areas in the
US at the surface, 750, 500, and 250 hPa, corresponding to the
results presented in Table 2. These figures show that the domain-wide
emission zero-out contributions (Fig. S5) are larger than those of
zero-out contributions from the US and east Asia (Fig. 6 and Table 2),
pointing to the impact of emissions from other regions on simulated ozone
concentrations. As expected, the impact of O3BC is small over the US due
to the distance from the equatorial boundaries. At the beginning of the
simulation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are dominated by initial conditions, as
shown by the close agreement between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and O3IC
curves during the first half of March. The sensitivity towards O3IC
declines throughout the simulation, while O3VORT and ZOC increase and
begin to dominate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation by April. However, even after the
1-month spin-up period, O3IC is still present over all time zones and all
altitudes. In this study, we initiated the H-CMAQ simulation from the prior
model simulation for 2010 (Hogrefe et al., 2018); however, this result
suggest that spin-up periods longer than 1 month may be necessary to fully
capture the effects of emissions and O3VORT contributions through
calculating HDDM sensitivities over a hemispheric-scale modeling domain.
Finally, Figs. S6–S9 still show differences between simulated
concentrations and the sum of O3VORT, O3IC, O3BC, and ZOC. Aside from the
nonlinearities and interactions mentioned above, this likely is also caused
by contributions of initial conditions of species other than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g.,
PAN or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e4201">Curtain plots of (left) ZOC of emissions from the US, (center) ZOC
of emissions from east Asia, and (right) sensitivity of O3VORT at US
ozonesonde sites of <bold>(a)</bold> Hilo (HI), <bold>(b)</bold> Trinidad Head (CA), <bold>(c)</bold> Boulder (CO), <bold>(d)</bold> Huntsville (AL), <bold>(e)</bold> Wallops Island (VA), and <bold>(f)</bold> Rhode Island during April 2010. Yellow stars indicate the time of available
ozonesonde measurements. Thick lines from bottom to top indicate 750, 500,
and 250 hPa as a representative bottom, middle, and top of free troposphere.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=404.029134pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3408?><p id="d1e4229">To illustrate altitude dependencies of the impacts of US and east Asian
emission and STT, vertical cross sections (“curtain plots”) of these
impacts at six ozonesonde sites across the US are examined in Fig. 8
(refer to Figs. 4 and S5 of Itahashi et al., 2020). In these curtain plots, the
pressure levels of 750, 500, and 250 hPa are marked to indicate the
representative altitude of the bottom, middle, and top of the free
troposphere. The comparison of the ZOCs from US and east Asian emissions
clearly shows the differences of their vertical structures. Over these
ozonesonde sites, except Hilo (Fig. 8a), the emission impacts from the
US greater than 10 ppbv are mostly confined to below 750 hPa (within the
boundary layer) and occasionally extend into the free troposphere. In
contrast, the emission impacts from east Asia can predominantly be found in
the free troposphere and sometimes extend into the boundary layer (below 750 hPa)
and/or the upper model layers (above 250 hPa). These patterns further
confirm that pollution lofted to the free troposphere over Asia can undergo
efficient transport across the Pacific and entrain to the lower troposphere
and boundary layer over the US. The sensitivity towards O3VORT is the
dominant factor over the upper model layers (above 250 hPa) and downward
into the upper part of the free troposphere, but most of its episodic impact
does not reach the middle of the free troposphere (500 hPa) or below. The
strong STT events seen in these cross sections, i.e., the events in early
and late April at Trinidad Head (Fig. 8b), early April at Boulder (Fig. 8c),
late April at Huntsville (Fig. 8d), and mid-April at Wallops
Island (Fig. 8e) and Rhode Island (Fig. 8f), are generally consistent
with the results inferred from the air mass classification technique
presented in the Part 1 paper. It should be however noted that a more robust
quantification of the fraction of ground-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that originated in
the stratosphere and its seasonal and spatial distributions would require
conduct of longer-term sensitivity simulations than those examined here.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Perspective on the changes in trans-Pacific transport</title>
      <p id="d1e4251">As has been shown in previous studies and affirmed in the current work,
trans-Pacific transport can impact air quality in the US. April 2010 was
used as the target period for our analysis because El Niño conditions
during that time period favored trans-Pacific transport. In this section, we
estimate the variation of trans-Pacific transport caused by recent emission
changes. According to the NOAA Climate Prediction Center (CPC), strong and
long-lasting El Niño conditions occurred from late 2014 to the middle of
2016 (NOAA and CPC, 2018). Observed average MD8O3 over the US was 46.9 ppbv in
April 2015, a decline from its April 2010 values of 52.2 ppbv, and the
number of sites exceeding the NAAQS declined from 39 sites in April 2010 to
7 sites in April 2015. From 2010 to 2015, annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (VOC) emissions
in the US decreased from 13.4 (13.6) Tg to 10.6 (12.9) Tg (see Fig. S1
of Itahashi et al., 2020). These emission
reductions likely contributed to the decline of the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios relative to the 2010 values. How about the trans-Pacific transport?
Anthropogenic emissions in China grew during the 2000s (Itahashi et al.,
2014) and reached the highest levels in the world in 2010; however,
substantial reductions have been measured by satellites since then (Irie et
al., 2016; Krotkov et al., 2016; van der A et al., 2017; Itahashi et al.,
2018). In addition, bottom-up emission inventories indicate that Chinese
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions were reduced as a consequence of clean air actions (Zheng
et al., 2018). In particular, Zheng et al. (2018) report that annual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions were reduced from 26.5 Tg in 2010 to 23.7 Tg in 2015,
while annual VOC emissions increased from 25.9 Tg in 2010 to 28.5 Tg in
2015. While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions have been regulated and subsequently declined
after reaching a peak of 29.2 Tg in 2012, the situation is more complex for
VOC emissions which show decreases from the residential and transportation
sectors but increases from the industrial sector and solvent use. Applying
the percentage changes in Chinese emissions from 2010 to 2015 to the HDDM
sensitivities for east Asian emissions (assuming that changes in east Asian
emissions are dominated by changes in China), we estimated their impacts on
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e4323">Perspective of changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration resulting from estimated 2010–2015 emission changes over (top
panels) the US and (bottom panels) east Asia at the <bold>(a)</bold> surface, <bold>(b)</bold> bottom of free
troposphere (750 hPa), <bold>(c)</bold> middle of free troposphere (500 hPa), and <bold>(d)</bold> top of free
troposphere (250 hPa).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4355">The changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio caused by emission changes between 2010
and 2015 over the US and east Asia can be investigated via Eq. (4).
Based on the emission changes noted above, the resulting values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (4) are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC emissions from the US, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC emissions from east Asia, respectively. The
estimated spatial changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios at the surface and aloft
are shown in Fig. 9, and estimates for monthly and daily means over four
time zones in the US are shown in Fig. 10 in a similar manner to Fig. 4.
The US emission reductions between 2010 and 2015 resulted in generally
reducing surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios with changes of  at
least <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv across the entire US and up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv over the
southeast US. Exceptions are found over Seattle, San Francisco, Los
Angeles, around the Great Lakes, and in New England regions that were
characterized as VOC sensitive in Sect. 3.2. These changes are expected
because reductions in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission were greater than those in VOC
emissions across the US. It is also shown that the US emission
reductions cause a reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio over the free
troposphere. On the time-zone-averaged basis, the changes in monthly mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv over PST,
MST, CST, and EST, respectively (Fig. 10). The maximum reductions are found
over CST because EST contains the complex sensitivity over New England
regions. In contrast, the changes in east Asian emissions between 2010 and
2015 do not cause a noticeable reduction in surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios
over the US, while they led to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio increases of more
than 1 ppbv over eastern China, the Korean Peninsula, and some parts of
Japan on a monthly average basis (Fig. 9). These increases are expected both because
these areas were shown to be VOC sensitive in Sect. 3.2 and because of the
increase in VOC emissions. On a time-zone-averaged basis, changes in east Asian
emissions between 2010 and 2015 are estimated to change the monthly mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratio across the US by about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv. The
corresponding changes in daily average surface-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio
were also less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv (Fig. 10). A slight reduction in monthly
mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios of around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv was estimated across large
parts of the Northern Hemisphere free troposphere, indicating that the
reductions in east Asian emissions that occurred between 2010 and 2015 can
partly contribute to a weakening of trans-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport over the
free troposphere. However, the reductions in Asian emissions during 2010 and
2015 did not appear to alter the monthly mean surface-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratio across the US.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e4690">Perspective of daily and monthly averaged changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratio resulting from estimated 2010–2015 emission changes over the US
(light blue bars) and east Asia (light red bars) summarized over four time
zones of Pacific, Mountain, Central, and Eastern Standard Time (PST, MST,
CST, and EST) in the US. The units are ppbv. On a monthly average (center
panel), whiskers indicate daily minimum and maximum. Note that the axis is
different in the left (PST and MST) and right panels (CST and EST).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/3397/2020/acp-20-3397-2020-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3409?><sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4720">In this study, the regional chemical transport model extended for
hemispheric applications, H-CMAQ, is applied to investigate trans-Pacific
transport during April 2010. The previous paper (Part 1) demonstrated that
STT can cause impacts on tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but did not relate to the
enhancement of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios. Therefore, in this Part 2
paper, emission impacts are investigated based on the sensitivity
analysis through HDDM. The sensitivities to domain-wide emissions indicate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sensitive conditions during April 2010 for tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
across most of the Northern Hemisphere except over eastern China and a few
urban areas over the US and Europe. Contributions of emissions from source
regions covering the US and east Asia were examined through propagation
of emission sensitivities in H-CMAQ. Analyses of estimated zero-out
contributions from the computed sensitivities demonstrate comparable impacts
of US and east Asian emissions on surface-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the
western US during<?pagebreak page3410?> April 2010, whereas contributions from US emissions
dominate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions over the eastern US. The analyses also
reveal the significant impacts of east Asian emissions on free tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the US which surpass the estimated impacts of US
emissions, further confirming the long-range pollution transport conceptual
view wherein pollution from source regions is convectively lofted to the
free troposphere and efficiently transported intercontinentally. Finally,
the effects of recent emission changes on the trans-Pacific transport of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are estimated. Under the assumed similar meteorological conditions in
2010 and 2015, it can be concluded that trans-Pacific transport resulting
from emission changes did not lead to significant changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratio over the US at the surface level even on a daily mean basis in April.
The year 2015 was selected because of El Niño conditions favorable to
trans-Pacific transport; however, the impacts of changes in year-specific
meteorological conditions are not investigated here. The possible impacts of
changing climate on trans-Pacific transport (e.g., Glotfelty et al., 2014)
should however be further examined. Long-term trend analysis taking into
account both emission and meteorological changes (e.g., Mathur et al.,
2018a) will be conducted in future work to further understand variability in
trans-Pacific transport patterns and contributions. While the 1-month
simulation period and analysis of a representative springtime month helped
characterize aspects of trans-Pacific transport, longer-term simulations
need to be conducted to further quantify the seasonal source region
contributions to trans-Pacific transport. The results presented here are
based on monthly or daily mean ozone during April 2010 and are not expected
to be consistent with other metrics (e.g., MD8O3) not analyzed here or times
of the year when transport is less favorable and local ozone production is
more favorable. The longer-term calculations will also help better quantify
the STT contributions to surface-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which appear to be lower in
the current analysis relative to previous studies (e.g., Lelieveld and
Dentener, 2000; Lin et al., 2015; Mathur et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4838">Source code for
version 5.2 of the CMAQ model can be downloaded from
<uri>https://github.com/USEPA/CMAQ/tree/5.2</uri> (U.S. EPA and ORD, 2017a, b). For further information, please
visit the US Environmental Protection Agency website for the CMAQ system:
<uri>https://www.epa.gov/cmaq</uri> (U.S. EPA, 2020).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4847">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3397-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3397-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4856">SI performed the analysis of observation and model simulation,
and prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors. RM and CH contributed to establishing the hemispheric
modeling application for this study and prepared the emission dataset and
initial condition from previous long-term simulation results. SLN contributed to the discussion of sensitivity analysis based on the
higher-order decoupled direct method. YZ contributed to the
literature review of trans-Pacific transport and refined this research
through simulation designs and results' interpretation.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4862">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4868">The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not
necessarily reflects the views or policies of the US Environmental
Protection Agency.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4874">Yang Zhang acknowledges support from the 2017–2018 NC State
Internationalization Seed Grant and the 2019–2020 NC State Kelly Memorial
Fund for US-Japan Scientific Cooperation.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4879">This paper was edited by Robert Harley and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia (EANET): available at: <uri>http://www.eanet.asia</uri>, last access: 19 April 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Appel, K. W., Napelenok, S. L., Foley, K. M., Pye, H. O. T., Hogrefe, C., Luecken, D. J., Bash, J. O., Roselle, S. J., Pleim, J. E., Foroutan, H., Hutzell, W. T., Pouliot, G. A., Sarwar, G., Fahey, K. M., Gantt, B., Gilliam, R. C., Heath, N. K., Kang, D., Mathur, R., Schwede, D. B., Spero, T. L., Wong, D. C., and Young, J. O.: Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1703–1732, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1703-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-1703-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Clappier, A., Belis, C. A., Pernigotti, D., and Thunis, P.: Source apportionment and sensitivity analysis: two methodologies with two different purposes, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4245–4256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4245-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-4245-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Clean Air Markets Division: available at: <uri>https://www.epa.gov/castnet</uri>, last access: 26 April 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cohan, D. S., Hakami, A., Hu, Y. T., and Russell, A. G.: Nonlinear response
of ozone to emissions: Source apportionment and sensitivity analysis,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 6739–6748, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es048664m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es048664m</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Emery, C., Liu, Z., Russell, A. G., Odman, M. T., Yarwood, G., and Kumar,
N.: Recommendations on statistics and benchmarks to assess photochemical
model performance, J.  Air   Waste Manage., 67, 582–598,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1265027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10962247.2016.1265027</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fiore, A., Jacob, D. J., Liu, H., Yantosca, R. M., Fairlie, T. D., and Li,
Q.: Varaiability in surface ozone background over the United States:
Implications for air quality policy, J. Geophys. Res., 108,
4787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003855" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003855</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fiore, A. M., Jacob, D. J., Bey, I., Yantosca, R. M., Field, B. D., Fusco, A.
C., and Wilkinson, J. G.: Background ozone over the United States in summer:
Origin, trend, and contribution to pollution episodes, J. Geophys.
Res., 107,   4275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000982" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000982</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Galmarini, S., Koffi, B., Solazzo, E., Keating, T., Hogrefe, C., Schulz, M., Benedictow, A., Griesfeller, J. J., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Carmichael, G., Fu, J., and Dentener, F.: Technical note: Coordination and harmonization of the multi-scale, multi-model activities HTAP2, AQMEII3, and MICS-Asia3: simulations, emission inventories, boundary conditions, and model output formats, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1543–1555, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1543-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1543-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Glotfelty, T., Zhang, Y., Karamchandani, P., and Streets, D. G.: Will the role of intercontinental transport change in a changing climate?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9379–9402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9379-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-9379-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guo, J. J., Fiore, A. M., Murray, L. T., Jaffe, D. A., Schnell, J. L., Moore, C. T., and Milly, G. P.: Average versus high surface ozone levels over the continental USA: model bias, background influences, and interannual variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12123–12140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12123-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-12123-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Haagen-Smit, A. J. and Fox, M. M.: Photochemical Ozone Formation with
Hydrocarbons and Automobile Exhaust, Air Repair, 4,   105–136,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00966665.1954.10467649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00966665.1954.10467649</ext-link>, 1954.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hakami, A., Odman, M. T., and Russell, A. G.: High-order, direct sensitivity
analysis of multidimensional air quality models, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37,
2442–2452, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es020677h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es020677h</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hakami, A., Odman, M. T., and Russell, A. G.: Nonlinearity in atmospheric
response: A direct sensitivity analysis approach, J. Geophys. Res., 109,
D15303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004502</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hogrefe, C., Liu, P., Pouliot, G., Mathur, R., Roselle, S., Flemming, J., Lin, M., and Park, R. J.: Impacts of different characterizations of large-scale background on simulated regional-scale ozone over the continental United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3839–3864, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3839-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-3839-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hoskins, B. J., McIntyre., M. E., and Robertson, A. W.: On the use and
significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 111, 877–946, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, M., Carmichael, G. R., Pierce, R. B., Jo, D. S., Park, R. J., Flemming, J., Emmons, L. K., Bowman, K. W., Henze, D. K., Davila, Y., Sudo, K., Jonson, J. E., Tronstad Lund, M., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Dentener, F. J., Keating, T. J., Oetjen, H., and Payne, V. H.: Impact of intercontinental pollution transport on North American ozone air pollution: an HTAP phase 2 multi-model study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5721–5750, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5721-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-5721-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Itahashi, S., Uno, I., and Kim, S-T.: Seasonal source contributions of
tropospheric ozone over East Asia based on CMAQ-HDDM, Atmos. Environ., 70,
204–217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.026</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Itahashi, S., Uno, I., Irie, H., Kurokawa, J.-I., and Ohara, T.: Regional modeling of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical column density over East Asia during the period 2000–2010: comparison with multisatellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3623–3635, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3623-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3623-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Itahashi, S., Hayami, H., and Uno, I.: Comprehensive study of emission
source contributions for tropospheric ozone formation over East Asia, J.
Geophys. Res., 120, 331–358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022117</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Itahashi, S., Yumimoto, K., Uno, I., Hayami, H., Fujita, S.-I., Pan, Y., and Wang, Y.: A 15-year record (2001–2015) of the ratio of nitrate to non-sea-salt sulfate in precipitation over East Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2835–2852, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2835-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2835-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Itahashi, S.,  Mathur, R., Hogrefe, C., and
Zhang, Y.: Modeling stratospheric intrusion and trans-Pacific transport on
tropospheric ozone using hemispheric CMAQ during April 2010 –
Part 1: Model evaluation and air mass characterization for stratosphere–troposphere transport, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20,  3373–3396, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3373-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3373-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Irie, H., Muto, T., Itahashi, S., Kurokawa, J., and Uno, I.: Turnaround of
tropospheric nitrogen dioxide pollution trends in China, Japan, and South
Korea, SOLA, 12, 170–174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2016-035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2151/sola.2016-035</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., and Murti, P.: Effect of rising Asia emissions
on surface ozone in the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26,
2175–2178, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jaffe, D. A., Cooper, O. R., Fiore, A. M., Henderson, B. H., Tonnesen, G.
S., Russell, A. G., Henze, D. K., Langford, A. O., Lin, M., and Moore, T.:
Scientific assessment of background ozone over the U.S.: Implications for
air quality management, Elem. Sci., Anth., 6, 56,   <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.309" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.309</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kim, S.-T., Byun, D. W., and Cohan, D. S.: Contribution of inter- and
intra-state emissions to ozone over Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, Civil Eng.
Environ. Syst., 26, 103–116, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Krotkov, N. A., McLinden, C. A., Li, C., Lamsal, L. N., Celarier, E. A., Marchenko, S. V.,
Swartz, W. H., Bucsela, E. J., Joiner, J., Duncan, B. N., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P.,
Levelt, P. F., Fioletov, V. E., Dickerson, R. R., He, H., Lu, Z., and Streets, D. G.: Aura
OMI observations of regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution changes from 2005 to 2015,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4605–4629, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lelieveld, J. and Dentener, F. J.: What controls tropospheric ozone?, J.
Geophys. Res., 105, 3531–3551, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Cooper, O. R., Naik, V., Holloway,
J., Johnson, B. J., Middlebrook, A. M., Oltmans, S. J., Pollack, I. B.,
Ryerson, T. B., Warner, J. X., Wiedinmyer, C., Wilson, J., and Wyman, B.:
Transport of Asian ozone pollution into surface air over the western United
States in spring, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D00V07, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016961" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016961</ext-link>,
2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Cooper, O. R., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O., Levy
II, H., Johnson, B. J., Naik, V., Oltmans, S. J., and Senff, C. J.:
Springtime high surface ozone events over the western United States:
Quantifying the role of stratospheric intrusions, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
D00V22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018151" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018151</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O., Oltmans, S. J.,
Tarasick, D., and Rieder, H. E.: Climate variability modulates western US
ozone air quality in spring via deep stratospheric intrusions, Nat.
Commun., 6, 7105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms8105</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3412?><ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Logan, J. A.: Tropospheric ozone: Seasonal behavior, trends and
anthropogenic influences, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 10463–10482, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Janssens-Maenhout, G., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Dentener, F., Muntean, M., Pouliot, G., Keating, T., Zhang, Q., Kurokawa, J., Wankmüller, R., Denier van der Gon, H., Kuenen, J. J. P., Klimont, Z., Frost, G., Darras, S., Koffi, B., and Li, M.: HTAP_v2.2: a mosaic of regional and global emission grid maps for 2008 and 2010 to study hemispheric transport of air pollution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11411–11432, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11411-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11411-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mathur, R., Xing, J., Gilliam, R., Sarwar, G., Hogrefe, C., Pleim, J., Pouliot, G., Roselle, S., Spero, T. L., Wong, D. C., and Young, J.: Extending the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system to hemispheric scales: overview of process considerations and initial applications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12449–12474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12449-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-12449-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mathur R, Kang, D., Napelenok, S., Xing, J., and Hogrefe, C.: Chapter 2: A
modeling study of the influence of hemispheric transport on trends in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions over North America, in:
Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXV, edited by: Mensink, C. and Kallos, G., Springer, 13–18,
2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mathur, R., Hogrefe, C., Hakami, A., Zhao, S., Szykman, J., and Hagler, G.: A
call for an aloft air quality monitoring network: need, feasibility, and
potential value, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 10903–10908, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02496" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b02496</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Napelenok, S. L., Cohan, D. S., Odman, M. T., and Tonse, S.: Extension and
evaluation of sensitivity analysis capabilities in a photochemical model,
Environ. Modell. Softw., 23, 994–999,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.11.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.11.004</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Napelenok, S. L., Foley, K. M., Kang, D., Mathur, R., Pierce, T., and Rao, S.
T.: Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality model's response to emission
reduction in the presence of uncertain emission inventories, Atmos.
Environ., 45, 4091–4098, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.030</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Goddard Space Flight
Center (GSFC): Chemistry and Dynamics Branch, available at:
<uri>https://acd-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/Data_services/cloud_slice/index.html</uri>, last access: 31 August 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Climate Prediction
Center (CPC), available at:
<uri>http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov</uri>, last access: 10 October 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Earth System
Research Laboratory (ESRL), Global Monitoring Division (GMD): ESRL/GMD
Ozonesondes, available at:
<uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ozwv/ozsondes/</uri>, last access: 31 August 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Earth System
Research Laboratory (ESRL), Global Monitoring Division (GMD): ESRL/GMD
Tropospheric Aircraft Ozone Measurement Program,
available at:
<uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ozwv/aircraft/index.html</uri>, last access: 31 August 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pouliot, G., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Kuenen, J., Zhang, J., Moran, M.
D., and Maker, P. A.: Analysis of the emission inventories and model-ready
emission datasets of Europe and North America for phase 2 of the AQMEII
project, Atmos. Environ., 115, 345–360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.061</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sarwar, G., Gantt, B., Schwede, D., Foley, K., Mathur, R., and Saiz-Lopez,
A.: Impact of enhanced ozone deposition and halogen chemistry on
tropospheric ozone over the Northern Hemisphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
9203–9211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01657" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b01657</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Simon, H.  and Bhave, P. V.: Simulating the degree of oxidation in
atmospheric organic particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 331–339,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202361w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es202361w</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Simon, H., Reff, A., Wells, B., Xing, J., and Frank, N.: Ozone trends across
the United States over a period of decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC emissons, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 49, 186–195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es504514z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es504514z</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and Development (ORD): Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Model Version 5.2, available at: <uri>https://github.com/USEPA/CMAQ/tree/5.2</uri>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and Development (ORD): CMAQ, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1167892" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.1167892</ext-link>,  Washington, DC, USA, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Ground-level Ozone Pollution, available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/table-historical-ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs">https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/table-historical-ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs</ext-link>,
last access: 1 April 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): CMAQ: The Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System, available at: <uri>https://www.epa.gov/cmaq</uri>, last access: 3 March 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van der A, R. J., Mijling, B., Ding, J., Koukouli, M. E., Liu, F., Li, Q., Mao, H., and Theys, N.: Cleaning up the air: effectiveness of air quality policy for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1775–1789, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1775-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1775-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Jang, C., Phillips, S., and Wang, B.: Modeling
intercontinental air pollution transport over the trans-Pacific region in
2001 using the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system, J.
Geophys. Res., 114, D04307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010807" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010807</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Nenes, A., and Fountoukis, C.: Implementation of dust emission and chemistry into the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system and initial application to an Asian dust storm episode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10209–10237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10209-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10209-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Hu, Y., Zhou, W., Zeng, L., Hu, M., Cohan, D. S.,
and Russell, A. G.: Decoupled direct sensitivity analysis of regional ozone
pollution over the Pearl River Delta during the PRIDE-PRD2004 campaign,
Atmos. Environ., 45, 4941–4949, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.006</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases (WDCGG): available at:
<uri>http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/gmd/wdcgg/</uri>, last access: 26 April 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>World Ozone and Ultraviolet Radiation Data Centre (WOUDC): Data Search/Download,
available at: <uri>https://woudc.org/data/explore.php?lang=en</uri>, last access: 3 March 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xing, J., Mathur, R., Pleim, J., Hogrefe, C., Wang, J., Gan, C.-M., Sarwar, G., Wong, D. C., and McKeen, S.: Representing the effects of stratosphere–troposphere exchange on 3-D <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions in chemistry transport models using a potential vorticity-based parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10865–10877, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10865-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10865-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3413?><ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Wen, X-Y., Wang, K., Vijayaraghavan, K., and Jacobson, M. Z.:
Probing into regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and particulate matter pollution in the United
States: 2. An examination of formation mechanisms through a process analysis
technique and sensitivity study, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D22305,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011900" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD011900</ext-link>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zheng, B., Tong, D., Li, M., Liu, F., Hong, C., Geng, G., Li, H., Li, X., Peng, L., Qi, J., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Zheng, Y., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14095–14111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Modeling stratospheric intrusion and trans-Pacific transport on tropospheric ozone using hemispheric CMAQ during April 2010  – Part 2: Examination of emission impacts based on the higher-order decoupled direct method</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The state-of-the-science Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling
system, which has recently been extended for hemispheric-scale modeling
applications (referred to as H-CMAQ), is applied to study the trans-Pacific
transport, a phenomenon recognized as a potential source of air pollution in
the US, during April 2010. The results of this analysis are presented in
two parts. In the previous paper (Part 1), model evaluation for tropospheric
ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) was presented and an air mass characterization method was
developed. Results from applying this newly established method pointed to
the importance of emissions as the factor to enhance the surface O<sub>3</sub> mixing
ratio over the US. In this subsequent paper (Part 2), emission impacts are
examined based on mathematically rigorous sensitivity analysis using the
higher-order decoupled direct method (HDDM) implemented in H-CMAQ. The HDDM
sensitivity coefficients indicate the presence of a NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-sensitive
regime during April 2010 over most of the Northern Hemisphere. By defining
emission source regions over the US and east Asia, impacts from these
emission sources are examined. At the surface, during April 2010, the
emission impacts of the US and east Asia are comparable over the western
US with a magnitude of about 3&thinsp;ppbv impacts on monthly mean O<sub>3</sub>
all-hour basis, whereas the impact of domestic emissions dominates over the
eastern US with a magnitude of about 10&thinsp;ppbv impacts on monthly mean
O<sub>3</sub>. The positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.63) between surface O<sub>3</sub> mixing
ratios and domestic emission impacts is confirmed. In contrast, the
relationship between surface O<sub>3</sub> mixing ratios and emission impacts from
east Asia exhibits a flat slope when considering the entire US. However,
this relationship has strong regional differences between the western and
eastern US; the western region exhibits a positive correlation
(<i>r</i> = 0.36–0.38), whereas the latter exhibits a flat slope (<i>r</i> <i>&lt;</i> 0.1).
Based on the comprehensive evaluation of H-CMAQ, we extend the sensitivity
analysis for O<sub>3</sub> aloft. The results reveal the significant impacts of
emissions from east Asia on the free troposphere (defined as 750 to 250&thinsp;hPa)
over the US (impacts of more than 5&thinsp;ppbv) and the dominance of
stratospheric air mass on upper model layer (defined as 250 to 50&thinsp;hPa) over
the US (impacts greater than 10&thinsp;ppbv). Finally, we estimate changes of
trans-Pacific transport by taking into account recent emission trends from
2010 to 2015 assuming the same meteorological condition. The analysis
suggests that the impact of recent emission changes on changes in the
contribution of trans-Pacific transport to US O<sub>3</sub> levels was
insignificant at the surface level and was small (less than 1&thinsp;ppbv) over the free troposphere.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia (EANET): available at: <a href="http://www.eanet.asia" target="_blank"/>, last access: 19 April 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Appel, K. W., Napelenok, S. L., Foley, K. M., Pye, H. O. T., Hogrefe, C., Luecken, D. J., Bash, J. O., Roselle, S. J., Pleim, J. E., Foroutan, H., Hutzell, W. T., Pouliot, G. A., Sarwar, G., Fahey, K. M., Gantt, B., Gilliam, R. C., Heath, N. K., Kang, D., Mathur, R., Schwede, D. B., Spero, T. L., Wong, D. C., and Young, J. O.: Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1703–1732, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1703-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1703-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Clappier, A., Belis, C. A., Pernigotti, D., and Thunis, P.: Source apportionment and sensitivity analysis: two methodologies with two different purposes, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4245–4256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4245-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4245-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Clean Air Markets Division: available at: <a href="https://www.epa.gov/castnet" target="_blank"/>, last access: 26 April 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Cohan, D. S., Hakami, A., Hu, Y. T., and Russell, A. G.: Nonlinear response
of ozone to emissions: Source apportionment and sensitivity analysis,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 6739–6748, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es048664m" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es048664m</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Emery, C., Liu, Z., Russell, A. G., Odman, M. T., Yarwood, G., and Kumar,
N.: Recommendations on statistics and benchmarks to assess photochemical
model performance, J.  Air   Waste Manage., 67, 582–598,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1265027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1265027</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Fiore, A., Jacob, D. J., Liu, H., Yantosca, R. M., Fairlie, T. D., and Li,
Q.: Varaiability in surface ozone background over the United States:
Implications for air quality policy, J. Geophys. Res., 108,
4787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003855" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003855</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Fiore, A. M., Jacob, D. J., Bey, I., Yantosca, R. M., Field, B. D., Fusco, A.
C., and Wilkinson, J. G.: Background ozone over the United States in summer:
Origin, trend, and contribution to pollution episodes, J. Geophys.
Res., 107,   4275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000982" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000982</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Galmarini, S., Koffi, B., Solazzo, E., Keating, T., Hogrefe, C., Schulz, M., Benedictow, A., Griesfeller, J. J., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Carmichael, G., Fu, J., and Dentener, F.: Technical note: Coordination and harmonization of the multi-scale, multi-model activities HTAP2, AQMEII3, and MICS-Asia3: simulations, emission inventories, boundary conditions, and model output formats, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1543–1555, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1543-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1543-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Glotfelty, T., Zhang, Y., Karamchandani, P., and Streets, D. G.: Will the role of intercontinental transport change in a changing climate?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9379–9402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9379-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9379-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, J. J., Fiore, A. M., Murray, L. T., Jaffe, D. A., Schnell, J. L., Moore, C. T., and Milly, G. P.: Average versus high surface ozone levels over the continental USA: model bias, background influences, and interannual variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12123–12140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12123-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12123-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Haagen-Smit, A. J. and Fox, M. M.: Photochemical Ozone Formation with
Hydrocarbons and Automobile Exhaust, Air Repair, 4,   105–136,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00966665.1954.10467649" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00966665.1954.10467649</a>, 1954.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Hakami, A., Odman, M. T., and Russell, A. G.: High-order, direct sensitivity
analysis of multidimensional air quality models, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37,
2442–2452, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es020677h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es020677h</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Hakami, A., Odman, M. T., and Russell, A. G.: Nonlinearity in atmospheric
response: A direct sensitivity analysis approach, J. Geophys. Res., 109,
D15303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004502</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hogrefe, C., Liu, P., Pouliot, G., Mathur, R., Roselle, S., Flemming, J., Lin, M., and Park, R. J.: Impacts of different characterizations of large-scale background on simulated regional-scale ozone over the continental United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3839–3864, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3839-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3839-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hoskins, B. J., McIntyre., M. E., and Robertson, A. W.: On the use and
significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 111, 877–946, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, M., Carmichael, G. R., Pierce, R. B., Jo, D. S., Park, R. J., Flemming, J., Emmons, L. K., Bowman, K. W., Henze, D. K., Davila, Y., Sudo, K., Jonson, J. E., Tronstad Lund, M., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Dentener, F. J., Keating, T. J., Oetjen, H., and Payne, V. H.: Impact of intercontinental pollution transport on North American ozone air pollution: an HTAP phase 2 multi-model study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5721–5750, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5721-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5721-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Itahashi, S., Uno, I., and Kim, S-T.: Seasonal source contributions of
tropospheric ozone over East Asia based on CMAQ-HDDM, Atmos. Environ., 70,
204–217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.026</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Itahashi, S., Uno, I., Irie, H., Kurokawa, J.-I., and Ohara, T.: Regional modeling of tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> vertical column density over East Asia during the period 2000–2010: comparison with multisatellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3623–3635, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3623-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3623-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Itahashi, S., Hayami, H., and Uno, I.: Comprehensive study of emission
source contributions for tropospheric ozone formation over East Asia, J.
Geophys. Res., 120, 331–358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022117</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Itahashi, S., Yumimoto, K., Uno, I., Hayami, H., Fujita, S.-I., Pan, Y., and Wang, Y.: A 15-year record (2001–2015) of the ratio of nitrate to non-sea-salt sulfate in precipitation over East Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2835–2852, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2835-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2835-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Itahashi, S.,  Mathur, R., Hogrefe, C., and
Zhang, Y.: Modeling stratospheric intrusion and trans-Pacific transport on
tropospheric ozone using hemispheric CMAQ during April 2010 –
Part 1: Model evaluation and air mass characterization for stratosphere–troposphere transport, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20,  3373–3396, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3373-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3373-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Irie, H., Muto, T., Itahashi, S., Kurokawa, J., and Uno, I.: Turnaround of
tropospheric nitrogen dioxide pollution trends in China, Japan, and South
Korea, SOLA, 12, 170–174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2016-035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2016-035</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., and Murti, P.: Effect of rising Asia emissions
on surface ozone in the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26,
2175–2178, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Jaffe, D. A., Cooper, O. R., Fiore, A. M., Henderson, B. H., Tonnesen, G.
S., Russell, A. G., Henze, D. K., Langford, A. O., Lin, M., and Moore, T.:
Scientific assessment of background ozone over the U.S.: Implications for
air quality management, Elem. Sci., Anth., 6, 56,   <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.309" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.309</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, S.-T., Byun, D. W., and Cohan, D. S.: Contribution of inter- and
intra-state emissions to ozone over Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, Civil Eng.
Environ. Syst., 26, 103–116, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Krotkov, N. A., McLinden, C. A., Li, C., Lamsal, L. N., Celarier, E. A., Marchenko, S. V.,
Swartz, W. H., Bucsela, E. J., Joiner, J., Duncan, B. N., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P.,
Levelt, P. F., Fioletov, V. E., Dickerson, R. R., He, H., Lu, Z., and Streets, D. G.: Aura
OMI observations of regional SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> pollution changes from 2005 to 2015,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4605–4629, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Lelieveld, J. and Dentener, F. J.: What controls tropospheric ozone?, J.
Geophys. Res., 105, 3531–3551, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Cooper, O. R., Naik, V., Holloway,
J., Johnson, B. J., Middlebrook, A. M., Oltmans, S. J., Pollack, I. B.,
Ryerson, T. B., Warner, J. X., Wiedinmyer, C., Wilson, J., and Wyman, B.:
Transport of Asian ozone pollution into surface air over the western United
States in spring, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D00V07, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016961" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016961</a>,
2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Cooper, O. R., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O., Levy
II, H., Johnson, B. J., Naik, V., Oltmans, S. J., and Senff, C. J.:
Springtime high surface ozone events over the western United States:
Quantifying the role of stratospheric intrusions, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
D00V22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018151" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018151</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O., Oltmans, S. J.,
Tarasick, D., and Rieder, H. E.: Climate variability modulates western US
ozone air quality in spring via deep stratospheric intrusions, Nat.
Commun., 6, 7105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8105</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Logan, J. A.: Tropospheric ozone: Seasonal behavior, trends and
anthropogenic influences, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 10463–10482, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Janssens-Maenhout, G., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Dentener, F., Muntean, M., Pouliot, G., Keating, T., Zhang, Q., Kurokawa, J., Wankmüller, R., Denier van der Gon, H., Kuenen, J. J. P., Klimont, Z., Frost, G., Darras, S., Koffi, B., and Li, M.: HTAP_v2.2: a mosaic of regional and global emission grid maps for 2008 and 2010 to study hemispheric transport of air pollution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11411–11432, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11411-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11411-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Mathur, R., Xing, J., Gilliam, R., Sarwar, G., Hogrefe, C., Pleim, J., Pouliot, G., Roselle, S., Spero, T. L., Wong, D. C., and Young, J.: Extending the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system to hemispheric scales: overview of process considerations and initial applications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12449–12474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12449-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12449-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Mathur R, Kang, D., Napelenok, S., Xing, J., and Hogrefe, C.: Chapter 2: A
modeling study of the influence of hemispheric transport on trends in
O<sub>3</sub> distributions over North America, in:
Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXV, edited by: Mensink, C. and Kallos, G., Springer, 13–18,
2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Mathur, R., Hogrefe, C., Hakami, A., Zhao, S., Szykman, J., and Hagler, G.: A
call for an aloft air quality monitoring network: need, feasibility, and
potential value, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 10903–10908, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02496" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02496</a>, 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Napelenok, S. L., Cohan, D. S., Odman, M. T., and Tonse, S.: Extension and
evaluation of sensitivity analysis capabilities in a photochemical model,
Environ. Modell. Softw., 23, 994–999,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.11.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.11.004</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Napelenok, S. L., Foley, K. M., Kang, D., Mathur, R., Pierce, T., and Rao, S.
T.: Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality model's response to emission
reduction in the presence of uncertain emission inventories, Atmos.
Environ., 45, 4091–4098, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.030</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Goddard Space Flight
Center (GSFC): Chemistry and Dynamics Branch, available at:
<a href="https://acd-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/Data_services/cloud_slice/index.html" target="_blank"/>, last access: 31 August 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Climate Prediction
Center (CPC), available at:
<a href="http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov" target="_blank"/>, last access: 10 October 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Earth System
Research Laboratory (ESRL), Global Monitoring Division (GMD): ESRL/GMD
Ozonesondes, available at:
<a href="https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ozwv/ozsondes/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 31 August 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Earth System
Research Laboratory (ESRL), Global Monitoring Division (GMD): ESRL/GMD
Tropospheric Aircraft Ozone Measurement Program,
available at:
<a href="https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ozwv/aircraft/index.html" target="_blank"/>, last access: 31 August 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Pouliot, G., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Kuenen, J., Zhang, J., Moran, M.
D., and Maker, P. A.: Analysis of the emission inventories and model-ready
emission datasets of Europe and North America for phase 2 of the AQMEII
project, Atmos. Environ., 115, 345–360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.061</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Sarwar, G., Gantt, B., Schwede, D., Foley, K., Mathur, R., and Saiz-Lopez,
A.: Impact of enhanced ozone deposition and halogen chemistry on
tropospheric ozone over the Northern Hemisphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
9203–9211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01657" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01657</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Simon, H.  and Bhave, P. V.: Simulating the degree of oxidation in
atmospheric organic particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 331–339,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202361w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es202361w</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Simon, H., Reff, A., Wells, B., Xing, J., and Frank, N.: Ozone trends across
the United States over a period of decreasing NO<sub>x</sub> and VOC emissons, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 49, 186–195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es504514z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es504514z</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and Development (ORD): Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Model Version 5.2, available at: <a href="https://github.com/USEPA/CMAQ/tree/5.2" target="_blank"/>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and Development (ORD): CMAQ, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1167892" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1167892</a>,  Washington, DC, USA, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Ground-level Ozone Pollution, available at: <a href="https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/table-historical-ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs" target="_blank">https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/table-historical-ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs</a>,
last access: 1 April 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): CMAQ: The Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System, available at: <a href="https://www.epa.gov/cmaq" target="_blank"/>, last access: 3 March 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
van der A, R. J., Mijling, B., Ding, J., Koukouli, M. E., Liu, F., Li, Q., Mao, H., and Theys, N.: Cleaning up the air: effectiveness of air quality policy for SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1775–1789, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1775-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1775-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Jang, C., Phillips, S., and Wang, B.: Modeling
intercontinental air pollution transport over the trans-Pacific region in
2001 using the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system, J.
Geophys. Res., 114, D04307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010807" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010807</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Nenes, A., and Fountoukis, C.: Implementation of dust emission and chemistry into the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system and initial application to an Asian dust storm episode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10209–10237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10209-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10209-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Hu, Y., Zhou, W., Zeng, L., Hu, M., Cohan, D. S.,
and Russell, A. G.: Decoupled direct sensitivity analysis of regional ozone
pollution over the Pearl River Delta during the PRIDE-PRD2004 campaign,
Atmos. Environ., 45, 4941–4949, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.006</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases (WDCGG): available at:
<a href="http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/gmd/wdcgg/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 26 April 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
World Ozone and Ultraviolet Radiation Data Centre (WOUDC): Data Search/Download,
available at: <a href="https://woudc.org/data/explore.php?lang=en" target="_blank"/>, last access: 3 March 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Xing, J., Mathur, R., Pleim, J., Hogrefe, C., Wang, J., Gan, C.-M., Sarwar, G., Wong, D. C., and McKeen, S.: Representing the effects of stratosphere–troposphere exchange on 3-D O<sub>3</sub> distributions in chemistry transport models using a potential vorticity-based parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10865–10877, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10865-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10865-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Wen, X-Y., Wang, K., Vijayaraghavan, K., and Jacobson, M. Z.:
Probing into regional O<sub>3</sub> and particulate matter pollution in the United
States: 2. An examination of formation mechanisms through a process analysis
technique and sensitivity study, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D22305,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011900" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011900</a>, 2009.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, B., Tong, D., Li, M., Liu, F., Hong, C., Geng, G., Li, H., Li, X., Peng, L., Qi, J., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Zheng, Y., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14095–14111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
