<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-20-2877-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Fine particle characterization in a coastal city in China: composition,
sources, and impacts of industrial emissions</article-title><alt-title>Fine particle characterization in a coastal city in China</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Fine particle characterization in a coastal city in China}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L. Lei et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Lei</surname><given-names>Lu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>Conghui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Dawei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Yao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Qingqing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0416-1130</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>Pingqing</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6249-2280</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Yong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>Xiaole</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4499-9322</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Zifa</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Worsnop</surname><given-names>Douglas R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Yele</given-names></name>
          <email>sunyele@mail.iap.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2354-0221</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and
Atmospheric Chemistry,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing 100029, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute of Surface-Earth System Science, Tianjin University,
Tianjin 300072, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yele Sun (sunyele@mail.iap.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>March</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>2877</fpage><lpage>2890</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>7</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>31</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>February</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e212">Aerosol composition and sources have been extensively studied in
developed regions in China. However, aerosol chemistry in coastal regions of
eastern China with high industrial emissions remains poorly characterized.
Here we present a comprehensive characterization of aerosol composition and
sources near two large steel plants in a coastal city in Shandong in fall
and spring using a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> time-of-flight aerosol chemical speciation
monitor. The average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) mass concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
in spring 2019 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was approximately twice that
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in fall 2018. Aerosol composition was
substantially different between the two seasons. While organics accounted
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass in both seasons,
sulfate showed a considerable decrease from 28 % in September to 16 % in
March, which was associated with a large increase in nitrate contribution
from 17 % to 32 %. Positive matrix factorization analysis showed that
secondary organic aerosol (SOA) dominated the total OA in both seasons, accounting on average for 92 % and 86 %, respectively, while the
contribution of traffic-related hydrocarbon-like OA was comparable
(8 %–9 %). During this study, we observed significant impacts of steel plant
emissions on aerosol chemistry nearby. The results showed that aerosol
particles emitted from the steel plants were overwhelmingly dominated by
ammonium sulfate and/or ammonium bisulfate with the peak concentration reaching as
high as 224 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Further analysis showed similar mass ratios for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.014) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.24) from the two different
steel plants, which were largely different from those during periods in the
absence of industrial plumes. Bivariate polar plot analysis also supported
the dominant source region of ammonium sulfate, CO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the
southwest steel plants. Our results might have significant implications for
better quantification of industrial emissions using ammonium sulfate and the
ratios of gaseous species as tracers in industrial regions and nearby in the
future.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e403">Atmospheric fine particles (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, particles with an aerodynamic
diameter less than 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) have great impacts on visibility
(Reddy and Venkataraman, 2000; Jinhuan and Liquan,
2000), climate forcing (Lohmann and Feichter, 2005; Carslaw
et al., 2010), and human health (Laden et al., 2000; Pope III et al.,
2002). Among the sources of aerosol particles, industrial emissions have
become one of the most important sources in rapidly developing countries,
e.g., China (Cao et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2014). However,
previous studies on chemical composition and sources were mostly conducted
in densely populated urban environments and remote or rural areas (Allan et
al., 2010; Aiken et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2012), while industrial plumes that
can have a large impact on urban air quality and residents nearby are much
less characterized. Aerosol particles in regions under the influences of
industrial emissions contain much higher concentrations of<?pagebreak page2878?> toxic substances
than those observed at urban and rural areas (Osornio-Vargas et al.,
2003; Lage et al., 2014), leading to much higher health risks for people
living nearby. Therefore, it is critically important to characterize the
chemical composition and sources of fine particles in the vicinity of
industrial plants and to have a better understanding of their formation
mechanisms, evolution processes, and potential health effects
(Davidson et al., 2005).</p>
      <p id="d1e423">Industrial activities in steelmaking such as coke production and
ore sintering emit a large amount of gaseous species, e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO (Brock et al., 2003; Weitkamp et al., 2005), and
particulate matter (Almeida et al., 2015; Taiwo et al., 2014). Heavy
metals, including Fe, Mn, Pb, etc. (Wong et al., 2006; Yang et al., 2018);
specific polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
(Athanasios et al., 2011; Leoni et al., 2016); secondary
inorganic species (Setyan and Jing, 2017; Wu et al.,
2018); and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (organic carbon to elemental carbon ratio)
(Chow et al., 2011) have been used as tracers to identify
various industrial processes and to estimate their influences on air
quality. During the last decade, real-time measurement instruments, e.g.,
the aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ATOFMS) and the Aerodyne aerosol mass
spectrometer (AMS), have been used to measure the rapid changes in particle
mixing states and chemical composition of industrial particles (Dall'Osto
et al., 2008; Setyan et al., 2019). Dall'Osto et al. (2008)
found several unique types of particles such as Fe-rich, Pb-rich, Zn-rich,
and Ni-rich particles from steelmaking progresses, and Setyan et al. (2019) found a
large increase in nonrefractory chloride from the Fe–Mn plant and the
adjacent steelworks based on the measurements of a high-resolution
time-of-flight AMS. Although the real-time measurements of fine particles
are important for understanding the rapid evolutionary processes of aerosol
composition, size distributions, and mixing states from industrial plumes,
few studies have been conducted in highly industrialized areas in China.</p>
      <p id="d1e460">Rizhao, located to the west of Yellow Sea, is one of the most important steel
production bases in Shandong, China. The steel production in 2018 was
approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> t, which is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the total
production in Shandong. In addition to emissions from the steel plants, the
air pollution in Rizhao is subject to multiple influences from local
emissions, regional transport from Linyi to the west and Weifang to the
northwest, and sea–land breezes. According to the Environment Statement of
Shandong province, the air quality in Rizhao has improved significantly with
the annual average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreasing from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2013 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017.
However, the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> still exceeds the National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as an annual average) by more than 40 %,
and severe haze episodes were also frequently observed in winter. Although
aerosol composition, sources, and formation mechanisms have been widely
characterized in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River
Delta during the last decade (Li et al., 2017), aerosol
chemistry in the coastal city of Rizhao, and chemical characteristics of
steel plant emissions, are rarely characterized. Therefore, it is of
importance to investigate the composition, sources, and variations in aerosol
particles near industrial areas and to better understand their impacts on
urban air quality and human health.</p>
      <p id="d1e588">In this work, we conducted two campaigns in the vicinity of steel plants in
Rizhao in September 2018 and March 2019 using an Aerodyne time-of-flight
aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ToF-ACSM) that was equipped with a
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerodynamic lens and a capture vaporizer. Aerosol particle
composition, diurnal variations, and potential sources are characterized,
and the sources of organic aerosol are analyzed with positive matrix
factorization. In particular, the chemical characteristics of pollutants
from the emissions of steel plants, and their impacts on air quality, are
elucidated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sampling site and measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e615">All measurements were carried out at a site near two steel plants in the
coastal city of Rizhao, Shandong (35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>59<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 119<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>57<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), from 2 to 29 September 2018 and 2 to 29 March 2019. As shown in
Fig. 1, the sampling site is located approximately 2 km northeast of the
Rizhao steel plant (RSP), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km southwest of the Shandong
steel plant (SSP), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km from the Yellow Sea. As shown in
Fig. 1c and d, the prevailing winds were from the east and southeast
during daytime in both September and March, while they were dominantly from
the north in September and from the west in March during nighttime. As a
result, the sampling site was subject to significant influence from sea–land
breeze. Also note that the two steel plants have differences in technologies
for controlling the emissions of pollutants. The newly built SSP uses more
advanced purification and emission control technologies, e.g., dry
desulfurization technology with the advanced activated coke compared with
wet limestone–gypsum flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) used in RSP. According
to the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the annual steel production
of the RSP was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> t and that of the SSP was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> t.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e735"><bold>(a, b)</bold> Location of the sampling site (© Google Earth). Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> show wind rose plots of daytime and nighttime for the entire study in September 2018 and March 2019, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2877/2020/acp-20-2877-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page2879?><p id="d1e752">An Aerodyne ToF-ACSM, which is equipped with a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerodynamic lens
and a capture vaporizer (CV), was deployed for real-time measurements of
non-refractory aerosol species in fine particles (NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), including
organics (Org), sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
and chloride (Chl) at a time resolution of 2 min. Briefly, ambient aerosol
particles were first drawn into the sampling line at a flow rate of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after passing through a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cyclone
(URG-2000-30EH). Aerosol particles were then dried with a Nafion dryer and
sampled into the ToF-ACSM at a flow rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. After
focusing into a narrow particle beam and flying through the vacuum chamber,
non-refractory aerosol species were flash vaporized at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">540</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and then ionized immediately by the 70 eV electron impact. The
ions were analyzed using the time-of-flight mass analyzer and detected by an
SGE dynode detector (Fröhlich et al.,
2013). Similar to quadrupole-ACSM (Ng et
al., 2011b), the mass concentrations of aerosol species were derived from
the differences between sampling mode and filter mode. The ionization
efficiency (IE) and relative ionization efficiencies (RIEs) were calibrated
using pure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before and after
the campaigns. The RIE of sulfate was fairly robust (1.1), while
that of ammonium changed from 3.1 in September 2018 to 3.8 in March 2019.
The default RIE values of 1.1, 1.4, and 1.3 were used for nitrate, organics,
and chloride, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e920">In addition to NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol species, a seven-wavelength Aethalometer
(model AE33, Magee Scientific) was used to measure black carbon (BC) at a
time resolution of 1 min. The gaseous species including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (model
43i), CO (model 48i), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (model 42i) were measured by various gas
analyzers from Thermo Fisher Scientific, and the meteorological parameters
including temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), relative humidity (RH), wind speed (WS), and wind
direction (WD) were measured by a WS500-UMB smart weather sensor (Lufft).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Data analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e969">The mass concentration and chemical composition were analyzed using the
standard ToF-ACSM data analysis software (Igor-based Tofware_2_5_13_ACSM;
<uri>https://www.tofwerk.com/tofware</uri>, last access: 20 July 2019). A collection efficiency (CE) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was used for mass quantifications as indicated by previous studies that AMS
or ACSM with CV has a fairly robust CE of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hu et al.,
2016a, 2018a, b). Our results showed that NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC
was well correlated with the total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass in both spring and fall
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.86), and the regression slopes of 0.89 and 0.78
suggested that the mass quantification of the ToF-ACSM was reasonable,
considering that mineral dust was not measured in this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e1036">The bilinear model positive matrix factorization (PMF) (Paatero and
Tapper, 2010) has been widely used to deconvolve organic aerosol (OA) into
different factors (Lanz et al., 2007; Ulbrich et al., 2009; Sun et
al., 2011). In this study, PMF analysis was performed for the organic mass
spectra from ToF-ACSM measurements to determine the potential OA from
different sources and processes. The detailed procedures for pretreatment of
the data and error matrices were presented in
Zhang et al. (2011). Considering the
limited sensitivity of the ToF-ACSM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s larger than 120 and 180 were excluded
in PMF analysis in September 2018 and March 2019, respectively, due to their
low signal-to-noise ratios and low contributions to the total OA mass.
After careful evaluations of mass spectral profiles, diurnal variations, and
correlations with external tracers, three OA factors including a
hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA), a less oxidized oxygenated OA (LO-OOA), and a more
oxidized OOA (MO-OOA) were determined in September 2018, and four<?pagebreak page2880?> factors,
i.e., HOA, LO-OOA, MO-OOA, and a coal combustion OA (CCOA), were identified in
March 2019. Compared with previous OA factors identified from PMF-AMS
analysis  (Ng et al., 2011a), the mass spectra of both
primary and secondary OA factors showed much higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (fraction of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 in OA) in this study due to increased thermal decomposition on the
surface of CV (Hu et al., 2018a, b).  Hu et al. (2018a)
also found that the previous AMS tracer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s are still present and usable in
mass spectra although the fragmentation in CV tends to shift towards small
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s due to additional thermal decomposition. Comparisons of PMF results further
showed consistent time series of OA factors between CV and standard
vaporizer (SV), yet the CV may introduce higher uncertainty in separating
different types of OOA (Hu et al., 2018b).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Mass concentrations, chemical composition, and diurnal variations</title>
      <p id="d1e1114">Figure 2 shows the time series of aerosol species, gaseous species, and
meteorological parameters during the two seasons. The average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) RH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was 62 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and 23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) in September 2018, which were overall higher than those
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively) in March 2019,
while the average WS was comparable between the two seasons (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). One of the major differences in meteorological
conditions is wind direction. While the prevailing winds were both from the
east and southeast during daytime, they were mainly from the north in
September and the west in March at night. We also noticed a considerable
frequency of southwesterly winds in spring of 2019, suggesting a high
potential impact of RSP on the sampling site.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1257">Time series of meteorological variables including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, RH, WD, and WS;
mass concentrations of gaseous species including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO;
and chemical species in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in <bold>(a)</bold> September 2018 and <bold>(b)</bold> March 2019,
respectively. The pie charts show the average chemical composition for the
entire campaign.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2877/2020/acp-20-2877-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1311">The average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC) concentration was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the entire study in
September 2018, which was approximately half of that (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in March 2019. This result suggested that air quality in March
was much worse than that in September, and the PM loading was even more than
50% higher than the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as an annual average). According to the measurements at the
Environmental Monitoring Station of Rizhao, the average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
concentration in September showed a continuous decrease from 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2013 to 22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2018, suggesting a significant
improvement in air quality in September. However, the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
concentration remained at relatively high levels ranging from 54 to 78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in March during the years of 2013–2018, indicating a great
challenge in reducing PM in this season.</p>
      <p id="d1e1507">Figure 2 shows the average aerosol composition during fall and spring. While
organics consisted of approximately one-third of the total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass in
both spring and fall, large differences in secondary inorganic species were
observed. For example, sulfate was the second largest component in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in fall, accounting for 28 %, and its contribution decreased to
16 % in spring. In contrast, nitrate showed largely elevated contributions
from 17 % to 32 %. These results indicate that the formation mechanisms
and sources of secondary inorganic species could be different during the two
seasons. BC contributed similar fractions to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in both seasons,
which are 7 %–8 %, and chloride was generally small at less than 2 %.
We noticed that the average composition in spring was similar to that
observed at a receptor site (Changdao island) in the north coast of Shandong
province in spring 2011 (Hu et al., 2013).
These results might suggest that aerosol composition did not change
significantly, although the PM levels decreased substantially during the last
decade. We further compared aerosol composition during and after the heating
season in March, and observed remarkably similar mass concentrations and
aerosol compositions during the two periods. One of the major reasons was
that the residents near the steel company were all relocated to other
places. As a result, the emissions from residential coal combustion were
small. Further support is that the coal combustion OA only accounted for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to the total OA mass as discussed in Sect. 3.2.</p>
      <p id="d1e1547">Although the mass concentrations and aerosol compositions were substantially
different, the diurnal patterns were overall similar for all aerosol species
during the two seasons, indicating that the factors driving the diurnal
variations were similar. As shown in Fig. 3, higher mass concentrations at
nighttime and in the early morning than in the daytime were observed for most aerosol species. Such diurnal patterns can be explained by the rising
boundary layer height during daytime and the prevailing winds from the east
and southeast that brought relatively clean air from the ocean. In contrast,
sulfate presented similar and relatively flat diurnal patterns in both fall
and spring, consistent with the fact that sulfate was mainly formed over a
regional scale. Despite the rising boundary layer height, the sulfate
concentrations remained relatively high during daytime. One reason was
likely due to the sea–land breeze that brought the potentially high sulfate
concentrations over the Yellow Sea (Li et al., 2018) to the sampling
site. Organics in fall also showed a relatively flat diurnal pattern due to
the dominance of MO-OOA that was highly correlated with sulfate.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1552">Average diurnal variations in mass concentrations of chemical
species in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in September 2018 (red) and March 2019 (blue),
respectively. The shaded areas and error bars indicate 25th and
75th percentiles. Also, the diurnal cycles of aerosol species, by
excluding the periods with the influences from steel plants in March, are
shown as blue open circles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2877/2020/acp-20-2877-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>OA composition and sources</title>
      <?pagebreak page2882?><p id="d1e1578">The mass spectra, time series, and diurnal variations of OA factors in fall
and spring are shown in Figs. 4 and 5. The mass spectra of HOA in both
seasons resembled those of primary emissions reported previously
(Canagaratna et al., 2004; Lanz et al., 2007; Mohr et al., 2009), showing
the typical characteristics of hydrocarbon ion series of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the HOA
spectra showed generally higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared with previous studies
(14 % in spring and 6 % in autumn) due to the increased thermal
decomposition in CV. Indeed, Hu et al. (2018b) also
observed much higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the HOA spectrum from CV than that from SV. HOA
was well correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.52–0.65) and BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.66–0.75) in both fall and spring, supporting that HOA was mainly
from traffic emissions. This is further supported by the pronounced diurnal
cycles of HOA showing higher mass concentrations during morning and evening
rush hours. The average mass concentration of HOA was 0.7
and 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in September and March, respectively. Although the
mass concentration had a difference by a factor of 2 during the two seasons,
the HOA contribution to total OA was comparable (8 % vs. 9 %), which is
also close to that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % reported in Beijing (Zhang et
al., 2014; Hu et al., 2016b; Sun et al., 2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1734"><bold>(a, b)</bold> Time series and <bold>(c)</bold> mass spectral profiles of OA factors in
September 2018 and March 2019. The time series of external tracer species
are also shown for comparisons. The two pie charts present the average OA
composition in September and March, respectively. Note that the periods with
the influences from steel plants were excluded when performing correlation
analysis between MO-OOA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2877/2020/acp-20-2877-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1767">Diurnal variations in mass concentration of OA factors in <bold>(a)</bold> September 2018 and <bold>(b)</bold> March 2019. The error bars indicate 25th and
75th percentiles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2877/2020/acp-20-2877-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1783">A coal combustion OA factor was identified in March 2019 (Fig. 4b and c).
The CCOA spectrum showed some similarities to that of HOA at small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s, yet it
was featured by pronounced PAH-related <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 91, 115, 152, 165, 178,
etc.  (Dzepina et al., 2007). Despite the high thermal
decomposition in CV, the PAH signatures can be well retained as those in
previous studies (Sun et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2013, 2016b). In
fact, CCOA was highly correlated with these PAH-related <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s. For instance,
CCOA was tightly correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 115 (mainly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Compared with HOA, CCOA presented a higher mass fraction of
larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating that coal combustion can be an
important source of high-molecular-weight organic matter during the heating
period. CCOA on average accounted for 5 % of the total OA mass in March
with an average concentration of 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Compared with
previously reported CCOA at urban sites, e.g., Beijing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and the receptor site Changdao in Shandong (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)
(Sun et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2013), CCOA in this study seemed not to be an
important contributor to OA, although it presented a pronounced diurnal
pattern with higher concentration and fraction at night. This is consistent
with the fact that local residents were all relocated to other places, and
the residential coal combustion emissions could not be significant.</p>
      <p id="d1e1943">Two secondary organic aerosol (SOA) factors with different oxidation levels were determined in both
September 2018 and March 2019. The total SOA (LO-OOA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MO-OOA) correlated
well with secondary inorganic components (SIA, i.e., sulfate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> nitrate),
and the ratios of SOA to SIA were 0.37 and 0.41 in September and March,
respectively, which were close to those reported in Beijing (0.36–0.42)
(Huang et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2010). The mass spectra of the two SOA
factors were both characterized by a prominent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 (mainly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
peak, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in MO-OOA was higher than that in LO-OOA
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). Comparatively,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were notably higher in LO-OOA than MO-OOA, suggesting
that MO-OOA was more oxidized than LO-OOA. Indeed, the MO-OOA tracked better
with sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.45–0.71), while the LO-OOA correlated better
with nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56–0.60). The diurnal patterns of MO-OOA and
LO-OOA were also different. LO-OOA showed similar and pronounced diurnal
variations in both September and March with much higher mass concentration
at nighttime than daytime. Such diurnal patterns were very similar to
nitrate, suggesting the similar semivolatile properties of LO-OOA and nitrate
(Docherty et al., 2011). In
contrast, MO-OOA presented relatively flat diurnal cycles that were
remarkably similar to those of sulfate, supporting the fact that MO-OOA was highly
aged and formed over a regional scale. SOA together accounted for 92 % and
86 % of the total OA mass in September and March, respectively. These
results highlight an overwhelming dominance of SOA in OA during both seasons
even though our sampling site is located near the steel plants. However, we also
found a change in SOA composition from March to September. In particular,
MO-OOA showed an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % higher contribution to OA in September
than March (60 % vs. 51 %), while the fraction of LO-OOA was comparable
(32 % vs. 34 %).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Potential sources of aerosol species</title>
      <p id="d1e2094">Figure 6 shows the bivariate polar plots of aerosol components and gaseous
species in September and March. In general, high concentrations near the
center area is associated with local sources, while that far away from the
center area is indicative of regional transport (Carslaw and Ropkins,
2012). It can be seen that a high concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in September was
mainly located in the region to the west (Fig. 6a), suggesting that regional
transport played the most important role for air pollution in Rizhao.
Comparatively, two high potential source regions for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
observed in March including local emissions and transport from the southwest
region where RSP is located. The source regions were also substantially
different for different aerosol species in September and March. As indicated
in Fig. 6a, high mass concentrations of sulfate, ammonium, and chloride were
mainly located in the southwest region in both September and March,
suggesting the large impacts of the emissions from the RSP. High
concentration of chloride likely existed mainly in the form of ammonium
chloride, considering that sea salt particles cannot be detected efficiently
at a vaporizer temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">540</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. We also
observed high potential source regions to the west of the sampling site for
sulfate, ammonium, and chloride in September. This result indicated that
regional transport from the west, e.g., Linyi, can also be a significant
contribution to air pollution in Rizhao. Comparatively, organics and nitrate
showed very different sources between September and March. While organics
and nitrate were dominantly from regional transport from the west in
September, they were mainly from local emissions and production in March. BC
showed similar source regions in the two seasons, which were from both local
emissions and regional transport.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2136">Bivariate polar plots of <bold>(a)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerosol species; <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OA factors in September 2018 (third row) and March 2019 (fourth row), respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2877/2020/acp-20-2877-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2182">HOA and LO-OOA showed similar potential source regions to those of organics
and nitrate, i.e., mainly transported from the west in September 2018 with
an increased contribution from local emissions in March 2019. In addition, a
potential source region located to the northwest was also observed for
LO-OOA in March. Similar to HOA and LO-OOA, the major source region of CCOA
was located to the west with an additional source region to the southwest.
The high potential source regions of MO-OOA were more complicated and have
many differences between the two seasons. As shown in Fig. 6b, regional
transport played a significant role for the high mass concentrations of
MO-OOA in both September and March. While MO-OOA was mainly transported to
the sampling site from the west in fall, the transport from the southwest
and northwest also contributed substantially to the high mass loading of
MO-OOA in spring, elucidating the diverse sources of MO-OOA during this
season. Overall, the regional transport from the west was the most
significant and common source for all OA factors in September and March,
although that from the northwest and southwest also played a role in spring.
The large differences in sources between sulfate, ammonium, and OA<?pagebreak page2884?> factors in
spring also demonstrated that the industrial plumes with high concentrations
of ammonium sulfate were not associated with correspondingly high OA.</p>
      <p id="d1e2186">The potential source regions for high concentrations of CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
located in the southwest region in both September and March, which were also
similar to those of sulfate and ammonium. These results illustrated the
similar and significant impacts of the emissions from the RSP on CO an
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as those of ammonium sulfate. We also noticed relatively high
concentrations of CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the northeast region in March,
suggesting the potential impacts of the SSP. However, the impacts appeared
to be much smaller than that of RSP. One reason is that the current steel
production of the SSP was much smaller than that of RSP. Another reason
could be due to the different FGD (Saarnio et al., 2014) and emission
control technologies. Compared with CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was subject to
multiple influences from steel plants, regional transport from the west and
south, and local production.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2246">Evolution of meteorological parameters including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH, gaseous
species, mass concentrations, and mass fractions of chemical species in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during six steelworks plume episodes. The pie charts show the
contribution of each species emitted completely from steel plants. The wind
rose plots depict the prevailing wind direction during each plume period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2877/2020/acp-20-2877-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2273">Correlations between <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> BC and CO, and <bold>(d)</bold> BC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during periods with (open
circles) and without (gray triangle) influences of the emissions from the
steel plants. RSP is the Rizhao steel plant and SSP is the Shandong steel plant.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2877/2020/acp-20-2877-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Industrial plumes</title>
      <?pagebreak page2886?><p id="d1e2347">Six clear industrial plumes, one in September and five in March, were
observed during this study. Depending on meteorological conditions, the
duration of plumes lasted from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 13 h. As shown in
Fig. 7, the steelworks plumes were characterized by dramatic increases in
sulfate and ammonium, while the changes in organics and nitrate were small.
This result was consistent with a study near a steel plant in Wales (UK),
which also showed sharp increases in sulfate and sulfur-containing particles
(Dall'Osto and Harrison, 2006). For example, the sulfate
concentrations varied significantly during the plume period with the highest
concentrations being 108 and 189 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
September and March, respectively. By subtracting the background
concentration that was determined as the average of 1 h data before and
after the plume, we found that the average mass concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emitted from steel plants varied from 18 to 55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the
six plumes, suggesting a large impact of steel plant emissions on the air
quality nearby. Figure 7 shows that aerosol particles from the steel plants
were overwhelmingly dominated by ammonium sulfate, and the contribution of
ammonium bisulfate to the total mass was in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 %–40 %. We noticed that the occurrence of six plumes was associated
with the southerly and southwesterly winds (Fig. 7), suggesting that
ammonium sulfate and bisulfate particles were dominantly from RSP, while the
emissions from the SSP appeared to be small. One reason is that more
advanced purification and emission control technologies are used for the
newly built SSP. Unfortunately, whether ammonium sulfate and bisulfate were
directly emitted from the steel plants or from the reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during transport from the steel plant to the sampling site
is unknown.</p>
      <p id="d1e2439">We also observed large increases in gaseous species of CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from steel plants during the plume periods. As shown in Fig. 8, CO
was highly correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
also moderately correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the
periods of the six plumes, while such correlations were much weaker during
periods in the absence of plume influences (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26–0.17). These
results suggest that a large fraction of CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
co-emitted from the steel plants, while these gaseous pollutants were
subject to multiple influences from different sources during other periods.
For example, BC, a tracer for incomplete combustion, was highly correlated
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during periods with small influences from steel plants
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), suggesting that BC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were mainly from
traffic emissions, because steel plants unlikely emit a large amount of BC.
As shown in Fig. 8, the average mass ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the steel plant plumes were significantly lower than those
during periods in the absence of plumes (1.24 vs. 1.55 and 0.014 vs. 0.04,
respectively). Although the SSP emits much less ammonium sulfate particles,
and gaseous CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we found that the ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were similar between these two steel plants. The previously
reported values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from other emission sources, e.g., biomass
burning (0.056–8.33) and on-road motor vehicles (0.04–0.05), were
significantly larger than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio during steel plant plumes in
this study (Schürmann et al., 2007; Fujita et al., 2012; Tiwari et al.,
2015; Santos et al., 2018). Moreover, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio during plume-excluded period was close to the values from vehicle emissions (0.04 vs.
0.04–0.05) (Fujita et al., 2012). The lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio was found to be characteristic of emissions from
coal burning, e.g., in power generation plants or<?pagebreak page2887?> steelworks, while
higher values were generally attributed to vehicle emissions
(Parrish et al., 1991). For example, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
value of 1.04, obtained from the fresh flue-gas plume from a coal-fired
power plant when FGD and fabric filter were used (similar to the flue-gas
cleaning conditions of RSP), is close to the value of 1.24 during steel
plant plumes in this study (Mylläri et al., 2016). In conclusion,
our results highlight that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios combined
with a significant increase in ammonium sulfate can be used as good
diagnostics for evaluating the impacts of steel plant emissions on air
quality in industrial regions and nearby.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2808">We conducted two campaigns in the vicinity of two steelworks in a coastal
city in Shandong, China, using a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ToF-ACSM and various colocated
instruments to investigate aerosol composition and sources in coastal
regions and chemical characteristics of air pollutants from the emissions of
steel plants. Our results showed that the mass concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varied greatly in the two seasons, and aerosol composition was also
substantially different. The average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in March 2019
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was approximately twice that in September 2018 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with nitrate being the largest fraction
(32 %) followed by organics (29 %). Comparatively, aerosol composition
in September showed a high contribution of sulfate (28 %) and
correspondingly low nitrate (17 %). PMF analysis showed the dominance of
SOA in both March and September (86 % vs. 92 %). While LO-OOA
contributed similarly to OA (32 % vs. 34 %), MO-OOA in September showed
a higher contribution than that in March (60 % vs. 51 %). Most aerosol
species showed similar diurnal variations in the two seasons with higher
concentrations during nighttime and lower values at daytime, which were
primarily driven by boundary layer dynamics and sea–land breeze. Sulfate and
MO-OOA, however, presented relatively flat diurnal patterns, because they were
formed over a regional scale. Bivariate polar plots reveal the two major
sources of air pollutants in this study, including the regional transport
from the west and the impacts of steel plant emissions from the southwest.
By analyzing six industrial plumes, we found that the emissions of steel
plants were characterized by large increases in sulfate and ammonium, as well as in gaseous species of CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In fact, aerosol particles of
the six plumes were overwhelmingly dominated by ammonium sulfate and
ammonium bisulfate. Although the SSP appeared to emit low concentrations of
sulfate and ammonium, we found that the ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were close to those from RSP, and they were both
significantly different from those during periods in the absence of
industrial plumes. Our results highlight that ammonium sulfate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be used to evaluate and quantify the
impacts of steel plant emissions on air quality in industrial regions and
nearby. Also, our results demonstrate a need for the RSP to reduce sulfur
emissions using more effective and advanced emission control technologies in
the future.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2986">The data in this study are available from the authors upon request
(sunyele@mail.iap.ac.cn).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2992">YS and ZW designed the research. LL, CX, QW, YC, and DW conducted the
measurements. LL, YH, WZ, and YS analyzed the data. PF, WH, XP, ZW, DRW, and YS
reviewed and commented on the paper. LL and YS wrote the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2998">Douglas R. Worsnop is an employee of Aerodyne Research, Inc. (ARI), which developed the ToF-ACSM utilized in this study.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3004">This research has been supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant nos. 2017YFC0212704 and 2017YFC0209601) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 41711540297).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3010">This paper was edited by Alex Lee and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., Salcedo, D., Cubison, M. J., Huffman, J. A., DeCarlo, P. F., Ulbrich, I. M., Docherty, K. S., Sueper, D., Kimmel, J. R., Worsnop, D. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Volkamer, R. M., Fortner, E., de Foy, B., Wang, J., Laskin, A., Shutthanandan, V., Zheng, J., Zhang, R., Gaffney, J., Marley, N. A., Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P., Molina, L. T., Sosa, G., and Jimenez, J. L.: Mexico City aerosol analysis during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban supersite (T0) – Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6633–6653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Allan, J. D., Williams, P. I., Morgan, W. T., Martin, C. L., Flynn, M. J., Lee, J., Nemitz, E., Phillips, G. J., Gallagher, M. W., and Coe, H.: Contributions from transport, solid fuel burning and cooking to primary organic aerosols in two UK cities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 647–668, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-647-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-647-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Almeida, S. M., Lage, J., Fernandez, B., Garcia, S., Reis, M. A., and
Chaves, P. C.: Chemical characterization of atmospheric particles and source
apportionment in the vicinity of a steelmaking industry, Sci. Total
Environ., 521–522, 411–420, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Athanasios, K., Sweetman, A. J., and Jones, K. C.: PAH molecular diagnostic
ratios applied to atmospheric sources: a critical evaluation using two
decades of source inventory and ai<?pagebreak page2888?>r concentration data from the UK, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 45, 8897, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202277u" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es202277u</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brock, C. A., Trainer, M., Ryerson, T. B., Neuman, J. A., Parrish, D. D.,
Holloway, J. S., Nicks  Jr., D. K. N., Frost, G. J., Hübler, G., and Fehsenfeld,
F. C.: Particle growth in urban and industrial plumes in Texas, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 107–118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002746" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd002746</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Ghertner, D. A., Herndon, S., Shi, Q.,
Jimenez, J. L., Silva, P. J., Williams, P., Lanni, T., Drewnick, F.,
Demerjian, K. L., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chase Studies of
Particulate Emissions from in-use New York City Vehicles, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 38, 555–573, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820490465504" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820490465504</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cao, G. L., Zhang, X. Y., Gong, S. L., An, X. Q., and Wang, Y. Q.: Emission
inventories of primary particles and pollutant gases for China, Chinese Sci.
Bull., 56, 781–788, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4373-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11434-011-4373-7</ext-link> 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, D. C.  and Ropkins, K.: openair – An R package for air quality data
analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 27,  52–61, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carslaw, K. S., Boucher, O., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Rae, J. G. L., Woodward, S., and Kulmala, M.: A review of natural aerosol interactions and feedbacks within the Earth system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1701–1737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Lowenthal, D. H., Chen, L. W. A., and Motallebi,
N.: PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source profiles for black and organic carbon emission inventories,
Atmos. Environ., 45, 5407–5414, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dall'Osto, M. and Harrison, R.: Chemical characterisation of single airborne
particles in Athens (Greece) by ATOFMS, Atmos. Environ., 40, 7614–7631,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.053</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dall'Osto, M., Booth, M. J., Smith, W., Fisher, R., and Harrison, R. M.: A
Study of the Size Distributions and the Chemical Characterization of
Airborne Particles in the Vicinity of a Large Integrated Steelworks, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 42, 981–991, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802339587" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820802339587</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Davidson, C. I., Phalen, R. F., and Solomon, P. A.: Airborne Particulate
Matter and Human Health: A Review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 737–749,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500191348" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500191348</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Docherty, K. S., Aiken, A. C., Huffman, J. A., Ulbrich, I. M., DeCarlo, P. F., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Snyder, D. C., Peltier, R. E., Weber, R. J., Grover, B. D., Eatough, D. J., Williams, B. J., Goldstein, A. H., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: The 2005 Study of Organic Aerosols at Riverside (SOAR-1): instrumental intercomparisons and fine particle composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12387–12420, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12387-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12387-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dzepina, K., Arey, J., Marr, L. C., Worsnop, D. R., Salcedo, D., Zhang, Q.,
Onasch, T. B., Molina, L. T., Molina, M. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: Detection
of particle-phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Mexico City using an
aerosol mass spectrometer, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 263, 152–170,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2007.01.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2007.01.010</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fröhlich, R., Cubison, M. J., Slowik, J. G., Bukowiecki, N., Prévôt, A. S. H., Baltensperger, U., Schneider, J., Kimmel, J. R., Gonin, M., Rohner, U., Worsnop, D. R., and Jayne, J. T.: The ToF-ACSM: a portable aerosol chemical speciation monitor with TOFMS detection, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3225–3241, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3225-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-3225-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fujita, E. M., Croes, B. E., Bennett, C. L., Lawson, D. R., Lurmann, F. W.,
and Main, H. H.: Comparison of Emission Inventory and Ambient Concentration
Ratios of CO, NMOG, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in California's South Coast Air Basin, J. Air
Waste Manage., 42, 264–276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10466989" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10473289.1992.10466989</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Croteau, P., Canagaratna, M. R.,
Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Evaluation of the new
capture vaporizer for aerosol mass spectrometers (AMS) through field studies
of inorganic species, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 51, 735–754,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1296104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2017.1296104</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, W., Hu, M., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Yuan, B., Chen, W., Wang, M., Wu,
Y., Chen, C., Wang, Z., Peng, J., Zeng, L., and Shao, M.: Chemical
composition, sources, and aging process of submicron aerosols in Beijing:
Contrast between summer and winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1955–1977,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015jd024020</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, W., Day, D. A., Campuzanojost, P., Nault, B. A., Park, T., Lee, T.,
Croteau, P., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Evaluation of the new capture vaporizer for aerosol mass spectrometers:
Characterization of organic aerosol mass spectra, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52,
1–44, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1454584" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2018.1454584</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, W., Day, D. A., Campuzanojost, P., Nault, B. A., Park, T., Lee, T.,
Croteau, P., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Evaluation of the New Capture Vaporizer for Aerosol Mass Spectrometers
(AMS): Elemental Composition and Source Apportionment of Organic Aerosols
(OA), ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 410–421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00002</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, W. W., Hu, M., Yuan, B., Jimenez, J. L., Tang, Q., Peng, J. F., Hu, W., Shao, M., Wang, M., Zeng, L. M., Wu, Y. S., Gong, Z. H., Huang, X. F., and He, L. Y.: Insights on organic aerosol aging and the influence of coal combustion at a regional receptor site of central eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10095–10112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10095-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10095-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, R.-J., Zhang, Y., Carlo, B., Kin-Fai, H., Jun-Ji, C., Yongming, H.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., and Francesco, C.: High
secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events
in China, Nature, 514, 218—222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13774</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, X.-F., He, L.-Y., Hu, M., Canagaratna, M. R., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhu, T., Xue, L., Zeng, L.-W., Liu, X.-G., Zhang, Y.-H., Jayne, J. T., Ng, N. L., and Worsnop, D. R.: Highly time-resolved chemical characterization of atmospheric submicron particles during 2008 Beijing Olympic Games using an Aerodyne High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8933–8945, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8933-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8933-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jinhuan, Q. and Liquan, Y.: Variation characteristics of atmospheric
aerosol optical depths and visibility in North China during 1980–1994,
Atmos. Environ., 34, 603–609, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00173-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00173-9</ext-link> 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laden, F., Neas, L. M., Dockery, D. W., and Schwartz, J.: Association of Fine
Particulate Matter from Different Sources with Daily Mortality in Six U.S.
Cities, Environ. Health. Persp., 108, 941–947, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108941" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1289/ehp.00108941</ext-link>,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2889?><ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lage, J., Almeida, S. M., Reis, M. A., Chaves, P. C., Ribeiro, T., Garcia,
S., Faria, J. P., Fernandez, B. G., and Wolterbeek, H. T.: Levels and
spatial distribution of airborne chemical elements in a heavy industrial
area located in the north of Spain, J. Toxicol. Env. Heal. A, 77, 856–866,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2014.910156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/15287394.2014.910156</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lanz, V. A., Alfarra, M. R., Baltensperger, U., Buchmann, B., Hueglin, C., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Source apportionment of submicron organic aerosols at an urban site by factor analytical modelling of aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1503–1522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Leoni, C., Hovorka, J., Docekalova, V., Cajthaml, T., and Marvanova, S.:
Source Impact Determination using Airborne and Ground Measurements of
Industrial Plumes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 9881,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b02304</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, J., Chen, X., Wang, Z., Du, H., Yang, W., Sun, Y., Hu, B., Li, J., Wang,
W., Wang, T., Fu, P., and Huang, H.: Radiative and heterogeneous chemical
effects of aerosols on ozone and inorganic aerosols over East Asia, Sci.
Total Environ., 622–623, 1327–1342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, Y. J., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Li, M., Zhou, Z., and Chan, C. K.:
Real-time chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter in
China: A review, Atmos. Environ., 158, 270–304,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.027</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-715-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mohr, C., Huffman, J. A., and Cubison, M. J.: Characterization of Primary
Organic Aerosol Emissions from Meat Cooking, Trash Burning, and Motor
Vehicles with High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry and Comparison with
Ambient and Chamber Observations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2443–2449,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es8011518" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es8011518</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mylläri, F., Asmi, E., Anttila, T., Saukko, E., Vakkari, V., Pirjola, L., Hillamo, R., Laurila, T., Häyrinen, A., Rautiainen, J., Lihavainen, H., O'Connor, E., Niemelä, V., Keskinen, J., Dal Maso, M., and Rönkkö, T.: New particle formation in the fresh flue-gas plume from a coal-fired power plant: effect of flue-gas cleaning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7485–7496, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7485-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7485-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Real-Time Methods for
Estimating Organic Component Mass Concentrations from Aerosol Mass
Spectrometer Data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 910–916,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es102951k</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L.,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y. L., and Jayne,
J. T.: An Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) for Routine Monitoring
of the Composition and Mass Concentrations of Ambient Aerosol, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 45, 780–794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.560211</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Osornio-Vargas, A. R., Bonner, J. C., Ernesto, A. M., Leticia, M., Claudia,
G. C., Sergio, P. D. L. R., Javier, M., and Irma, R.: Proinflammatory and
cytotoxic effects of Mexico City air pollution particulate matter in vitro
are dependent on particle size and composition, Environ. Health. Persp.,
111, 1289–1293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.5913" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1289/ehp.5913</ext-link> 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/env.3170050203</ext-link> 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Parrish, D. D.,
Trainer, M.,
Buhr, M. P.,
Watkins, B. A., and
Fehsenfeld, F. C.: Carbon monoxide concentrations and
their relation to concentrations of total reactive oxidized nitrogen at two
rural U.S. sites, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 9309–9320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD00047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91JD00047</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pope III, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Thun, M. J., Calle, E. E., Krewski, D.,
Ito, K., and Thurston, G. D.: Lung Cancer, Cardiopulmonary Mortality, and
Long-term Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution, JAMA, 287, 1132–1141,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.9.1132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1001/jama.287.9.1132</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reddy, M.  and Venkataraman, C.: Atmospheric optical and radiative effects
of anthropogenic aerosol constituents from India, Atmos. Environ., 34,
4511–4523, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00105-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00105-9</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saarnio, K., Frey, A., Niemi, J. V., Timonen, H., Rönkkö, T.,
Karjalainen, P., Vestenius, M., Teinilä, K., Pirjola, L., and
Niemelä, V.: Chemical composition and size of particles in emissions of
a coal-fired power plant with flue gas desulfurization, J. Aerosol. Sci.,
73, 14–26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.03.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.03.004</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Santos, F., Longo, K., Guenther, A., Kim, S., Gu, D., Oram, D., Forster, G., Lee, J., Hopkins, J., Brito, J., and Freitas, S.: Biomass burning emission disturbances of isoprene oxidation in a tropical forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12715–12734, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12715-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-12715-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schürmann, G., Schäfer, K., Jahn, C., Hoffmann, H., Bauerfeind, M.,
Fleuti, E., and Rappenglück, B.: The impact of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO and VOC emissions
on the air quality of Zurich airport, Atmos. Environ., 41, 103–118,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.030</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Setyan, A.  and Jing, W.: Very low emissions of airborne particulate
pollutants measured from two municipal solid waste incineration plants in
Switzerland, Atmos. Environ., 166, 99–109,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.018</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Setyan, A., Flament, P., Locoge, N., Deboudt, K., Riffault, V., Alleman, L.
Y., Schoemaecker, C., Arndt, J., Augustin, P., Healy, R. M., Wenger, J. C.,
Cazier, F., Delbarre, H., Dewaele, D., Dewalle, P., Fourmentin, M.,
Genevray, P., Gengembre, C., Leonardis, T., Marris, H., and Mbengue, S.:
Investigation on the near-field evolution of industrial plumes from
metalworking activities, Sci. Total Environ., 668, 443–456,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.399" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.399</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, J., Zhang, Q., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Y., Ng, N. L., Sun, Y.,
Jayne, J. T., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., and Worsnop, D. R.: Highly time- and
size-resolved characterization of submicron aerosol particles in Beijing
using an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Atmos. Environ., 44, 131–140,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.020</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, H., Yang, T., Jie, L., Pan, X., Ping, C., and
Jayne, J. T.: Characterization of summer organic and inorganic aerosols in
Beijing, China with an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor, Atmos. Environ.,
51, 250–259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Du, W., Fu, P., Wang, Q., Li, J., Ge, X., Zhang, Q., Zhu, C., Ren, L., Xu, W., Zhao, J., Han, T., Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, Z.: Primary and secondary aerosols in Beijing in winter: sources<?pagebreak page2890?>, variations and processes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8309–8329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, Y.-L., Zhang, Q., Schwab, J. J., Demerjian, K. L., Chen, W.-N., Bae, M.-S., Hung, H.-M., Hogrefe, O., Frank, B., Rattigan, O. V., and Lin, Y.-C.: Characterization of the sources and processes of organic and inorganic aerosols in New York city with a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass apectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1581–1602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1581-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1581-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Taiwo, A. M., Harrison, R. M., and Shi, Z.: A review of receptor
modelling of industrially emitted particulate matter, Atmos. Environ., 97,
109–120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.051</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tiwari, S., Dahiya, A., and Kumar, N.: Investigation into relationships
among NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO at an urban background site in Delhi, India,
Atmos. Res., 157, 119–126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.01.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.01.008</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2891–2918, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Weitkamp, E. A., Pancras, L. P. J., Ondov, J. M., Polidori, A., Turpin, B.
J., and Robinson, A. L.: Fine particle emission profile for a large coke
production facility based on highly time-resolved fence line measurements,
Atmos. Environ., 39, 6719–6733, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.06.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.06.028</ext-link>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wong, H. K. T., Banic, C. M., Robert, S., Nejedly, Z., and Campbell, J. L.:
In-stack and in-plume characterization of particulate metals emitted from a
copper smelter, Geochem.-Explor. Env. A., 6, 131–137,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/05-083" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/1467-7873/05-083</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, Y., Ge, X., Wang, J., Shen, Y., Ye, Z., Ge, S., Wu, Y., Yu, H., and
Chen, M.: Responses of secondary aerosols to relative humidity and
photochemical activities in an industrialized environment during late
winter, Atmos. Environ., 193, 66–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.008</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, Z., Tang, S., Zhang, Z., Liu, C., and Ge, X.: Characterization of PM10
surrounding a cement plant with integrated facilities for co-processing of
hazardous wastes, J. Clean Prod., 186, 831–839,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.178" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.178</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, J. K., Sun, Y., Liu, Z. R., Ji, D. S., Hu, B., Liu, Q., and Wang, Y. S.: Characterization of submicron aerosols during a month of serious pollution in Beijing, 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2887–2903, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via
factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem.,
401, 3045–3067, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Fine particle characterization in a coastal city in China: composition, sources, and impacts of industrial emissions</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Aerosol composition and sources have been extensively studied in
developed regions in China. However, aerosol chemistry in coastal regions of
eastern China with high industrial emissions remains poorly characterized.
Here we present a comprehensive characterization of aerosol composition and
sources near two large steel plants in a coastal city in Shandong in fall
and spring using a PM<sub>2.5</sub> time-of-flight aerosol chemical speciation
monitor. The average (±1<i>σ</i>) mass concentration of PM<sub>2.5</sub>
in spring 2019 (54±44&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>) was approximately twice that
(26±23&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>) in fall 2018. Aerosol composition was
substantially different between the two seasons. While organics accounted
for  ∼ 30&thinsp;% of the total PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass in both seasons,
sulfate showed a considerable decrease from 28&thinsp;% in September to 16&thinsp;% in
March, which was associated with a large increase in nitrate contribution
from 17&thinsp;% to 32&thinsp;%. Positive matrix factorization analysis showed that
secondary organic aerosol (SOA) dominated the total OA in both seasons, accounting on average for 92&thinsp;% and 86&thinsp;%, respectively, while the
contribution of traffic-related hydrocarbon-like OA was comparable
(8&thinsp;%–9&thinsp;%). During this study, we observed significant impacts of steel plant
emissions on aerosol chemistry nearby. The results showed that aerosol
particles emitted from the steel plants were overwhelmingly dominated by
ammonium sulfate and/or ammonium bisulfate with the peak concentration reaching as
high as 224&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>. Further analysis showed similar mass ratios for
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>∕CO (0.014) and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>∕SO<sub>2</sub> (1.24) from the two different
steel plants, which were largely different from those during periods in the
absence of industrial plumes. Bivariate polar plot analysis also supported
the dominant source region of ammonium sulfate, CO, and SO<sub>2</sub> from the
southwest steel plants. Our results might have significant implications for
better quantification of industrial emissions using ammonium sulfate and the
ratios of gaseous species as tracers in industrial regions and nearby in the
future.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., Salcedo, D., Cubison, M. J., Huffman, J. A., DeCarlo, P. F., Ulbrich, I. M., Docherty, K. S., Sueper, D., Kimmel, J. R., Worsnop, D. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Volkamer, R. M., Fortner, E., de Foy, B., Wang, J., Laskin, A., Shutthanandan, V., Zheng, J., Zhang, R., Gaffney, J., Marley, N. A., Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P., Molina, L. T., Sosa, G., and Jimenez, J. L.: Mexico City aerosol analysis during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban supersite (T0) – Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6633–6653, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Allan, J. D., Williams, P. I., Morgan, W. T., Martin, C. L., Flynn, M. J., Lee, J., Nemitz, E., Phillips, G. J., Gallagher, M. W., and Coe, H.: Contributions from transport, solid fuel burning and cooking to primary organic aerosols in two UK cities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 647–668, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-647-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-647-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Almeida, S. M., Lage, J., Fernandez, B., Garcia, S., Reis, M. A., and
Chaves, P. C.: Chemical characterization of atmospheric particles and source
apportionment in the vicinity of a steelmaking industry, Sci. Total
Environ., 521–522, 411–420, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.112</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Athanasios, K., Sweetman, A. J., and Jones, K. C.: PAH molecular diagnostic
ratios applied to atmospheric sources: a critical evaluation using two
decades of source inventory and air concentration data from the UK, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 45, 8897, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202277u" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es202277u</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Brock, C. A., Trainer, M., Ryerson, T. B., Neuman, J. A., Parrish, D. D.,
Holloway, J. S., Nicks  Jr., D. K. N., Frost, G. J., Hübler, G., and Fehsenfeld,
F. C.: Particle growth in urban and industrial plumes in Texas, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 107–118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002746" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002746</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Ghertner, D. A., Herndon, S., Shi, Q.,
Jimenez, J. L., Silva, P. J., Williams, P., Lanni, T., Drewnick, F.,
Demerjian, K. L., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chase Studies of
Particulate Emissions from in-use New York City Vehicles, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 38, 555–573, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820490465504" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820490465504</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, G. L., Zhang, X. Y., Gong, S. L., An, X. Q., and Wang, Y. Q.: Emission
inventories of primary particles and pollutant gases for China, Chinese Sci.
Bull., 56, 781–788, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4373-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4373-7</a> 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, D. C.  and Ropkins, K.: openair – An R package for air quality data
analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 27,  52–61, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, K. S., Boucher, O., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Rae, J. G. L., Woodward, S., and Kulmala, M.: A review of natural aerosol interactions and feedbacks within the Earth system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1701–1737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Lowenthal, D. H., Chen, L. W. A., and Motallebi,
N.: PM<sub>2.5</sub> source profiles for black and organic carbon emission inventories,
Atmos. Environ., 45, 5407–5414, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dall'Osto, M. and Harrison, R.: Chemical characterisation of single airborne
particles in Athens (Greece) by ATOFMS, Atmos. Environ., 40, 7614–7631,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.053</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dall'Osto, M., Booth, M. J., Smith, W., Fisher, R., and Harrison, R. M.: A
Study of the Size Distributions and the Chemical Characterization of
Airborne Particles in the Vicinity of a Large Integrated Steelworks, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 42, 981–991, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802339587" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802339587</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Davidson, C. I., Phalen, R. F., and Solomon, P. A.: Airborne Particulate
Matter and Human Health: A Review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 737–749,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500191348" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500191348</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Docherty, K. S., Aiken, A. C., Huffman, J. A., Ulbrich, I. M., DeCarlo, P. F., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Snyder, D. C., Peltier, R. E., Weber, R. J., Grover, B. D., Eatough, D. J., Williams, B. J., Goldstein, A. H., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: The 2005 Study of Organic Aerosols at Riverside (SOAR-1): instrumental intercomparisons and fine particle composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12387–12420, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12387-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12387-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Dzepina, K., Arey, J., Marr, L. C., Worsnop, D. R., Salcedo, D., Zhang, Q.,
Onasch, T. B., Molina, L. T., Molina, M. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: Detection
of particle-phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Mexico City using an
aerosol mass spectrometer, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 263, 152–170,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2007.01.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2007.01.010</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Fröhlich, R., Cubison, M. J., Slowik, J. G., Bukowiecki, N., Prévôt, A. S. H., Baltensperger, U., Schneider, J., Kimmel, J. R., Gonin, M., Rohner, U., Worsnop, D. R., and Jayne, J. T.: The ToF-ACSM: a portable aerosol chemical speciation monitor with TOFMS detection, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3225–3241, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3225-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3225-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Fujita, E. M., Croes, B. E., Bennett, C. L., Lawson, D. R., Lurmann, F. W.,
and Main, H. H.: Comparison of Emission Inventory and Ambient Concentration
Ratios of CO, NMOG, and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in California's South Coast Air Basin, J. Air
Waste Manage., 42, 264–276, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10466989" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10466989</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Croteau, P., Canagaratna, M. R.,
Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Evaluation of the new
capture vaporizer for aerosol mass spectrometers (AMS) through field studies
of inorganic species, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 51, 735–754,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1296104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1296104</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W., Hu, M., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Yuan, B., Chen, W., Wang, M., Wu,
Y., Chen, C., Wang, Z., Peng, J., Zeng, L., and Shao, M.: Chemical
composition, sources, and aging process of submicron aerosols in Beijing:
Contrast between summer and winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1955–1977,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024020</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W., Day, D. A., Campuzanojost, P., Nault, B. A., Park, T., Lee, T.,
Croteau, P., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Evaluation of the new capture vaporizer for aerosol mass spectrometers:
Characterization of organic aerosol mass spectra, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52,
1–44, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1454584" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1454584</a>, 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W., Day, D. A., Campuzanojost, P., Nault, B. A., Park, T., Lee, T.,
Croteau, P., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Evaluation of the New Capture Vaporizer for Aerosol Mass Spectrometers
(AMS): Elemental Composition and Source Apportionment of Organic Aerosols
(OA), ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 410–421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00002</a>, 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W. W., Hu, M., Yuan, B., Jimenez, J. L., Tang, Q., Peng, J. F., Hu, W., Shao, M., Wang, M., Zeng, L. M., Wu, Y. S., Gong, Z. H., Huang, X. F., and He, L. Y.: Insights on organic aerosol aging and the influence of coal combustion at a regional receptor site of central eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10095–10112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10095-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10095-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, R.-J., Zhang, Y., Carlo, B., Kin-Fai, H., Jun-Ji, C., Yongming, H.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., and Francesco, C.: High
secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events
in China, Nature, 514, 218—222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, X.-F., He, L.-Y., Hu, M., Canagaratna, M. R., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhu, T., Xue, L., Zeng, L.-W., Liu, X.-G., Zhang, Y.-H., Jayne, J. T., Ng, N. L., and Worsnop, D. R.: Highly time-resolved chemical characterization of atmospheric submicron particles during 2008 Beijing Olympic Games using an Aerodyne High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8933–8945, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8933-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8933-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Jinhuan, Q. and Liquan, Y.: Variation characteristics of atmospheric
aerosol optical depths and visibility in North China during 1980–1994,
Atmos. Environ., 34, 603–609, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00173-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00173-9</a> 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Laden, F., Neas, L. M., Dockery, D. W., and Schwartz, J.: Association of Fine
Particulate Matter from Different Sources with Daily Mortality in Six U.S.
Cities, Environ. Health. Persp., 108, 941–947, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108941" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108941</a>,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Lage, J., Almeida, S. M., Reis, M. A., Chaves, P. C., Ribeiro, T., Garcia,
S., Faria, J. P., Fernandez, B. G., and Wolterbeek, H. T.: Levels and
spatial distribution of airborne chemical elements in a heavy industrial
area located in the north of Spain, J. Toxicol. Env. Heal. A, 77, 856–866,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2014.910156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2014.910156</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Lanz, V. A., Alfarra, M. R., Baltensperger, U., Buchmann, B., Hueglin, C., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Source apportionment of submicron organic aerosols at an urban site by factor analytical modelling of aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1503–1522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Leoni, C., Hovorka, J., Docekalova, V., Cajthaml, T., and Marvanova, S.:
Source Impact Determination using Airborne and Ground Measurements of
Industrial Plumes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 9881,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02304" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02304</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Chen, X., Wang, Z., Du, H., Yang, W., Sun, Y., Hu, B., Li, J., Wang,
W., Wang, T., Fu, P., and Huang, H.: Radiative and heterogeneous chemical
effects of aerosols on ozone and inorganic aerosols over East Asia, Sci.
Total Environ., 622–623, 1327–1342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y. J., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Li, M., Zhou, Z., and Chan, C. K.:
Real-time chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter in
China: A review, Atmos. Environ., 158, 270–304,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.027</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Mohr, C., Huffman, J. A., and Cubison, M. J.: Characterization of Primary
Organic Aerosol Emissions from Meat Cooking, Trash Burning, and Motor
Vehicles with High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry and Comparison with
Ambient and Chamber Observations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2443–2449,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es8011518" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es8011518</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Mylläri, F., Asmi, E., Anttila, T., Saukko, E., Vakkari, V., Pirjola, L., Hillamo, R., Laurila, T., Häyrinen, A., Rautiainen, J., Lihavainen, H., O'Connor, E., Niemelä, V., Keskinen, J., Dal Maso, M., and Rönkkö, T.: New particle formation in the fresh flue-gas plume from a coal-fired power plant: effect of flue-gas cleaning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7485–7496, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7485-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7485-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Real-Time Methods for
Estimating Organic Component Mass Concentrations from Aerosol Mass
Spectrometer Data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 910–916,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k</a>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L.,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y. L., and Jayne,
J. T.: An Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) for Routine Monitoring
of the Composition and Mass Concentrations of Ambient Aerosol, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 45, 780–794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211</a>, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Osornio-Vargas, A. R., Bonner, J. C., Ernesto, A. M., Leticia, M., Claudia,
G. C., Sergio, P. D. L. R., Javier, M., and Irma, R.: Proinflammatory and
cytotoxic effects of Mexico City air pollution particulate matter in vitro
are dependent on particle size and composition, Environ. Health. Persp.,
111, 1289–1293, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.5913" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.5913</a> 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203</a> 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Parrish, D. D.,
Trainer, M.,
Buhr, M. P.,
Watkins, B. A., and
Fehsenfeld, F. C.: Carbon monoxide concentrations and
their relation to concentrations of total reactive oxidized nitrogen at two
rural U.S. sites, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 9309–9320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD00047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD00047</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Pope III, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Thun, M. J., Calle, E. E., Krewski, D.,
Ito, K., and Thurston, G. D.: Lung Cancer, Cardiopulmonary Mortality, and
Long-term Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution, JAMA, 287, 1132–1141,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.9.1132" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.9.1132</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Reddy, M.  and Venkataraman, C.: Atmospheric optical and radiative effects
of anthropogenic aerosol constituents from India, Atmos. Environ., 34,
4511–4523, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00105-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00105-9</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Saarnio, K., Frey, A., Niemi, J. V., Timonen, H., Rönkkö, T.,
Karjalainen, P., Vestenius, M., Teinilä, K., Pirjola, L., and
Niemelä, V.: Chemical composition and size of particles in emissions of
a coal-fired power plant with flue gas desulfurization, J. Aerosol. Sci.,
73, 14–26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.03.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.03.004</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Santos, F., Longo, K., Guenther, A., Kim, S., Gu, D., Oram, D., Forster, G., Lee, J., Hopkins, J., Brito, J., and Freitas, S.: Biomass burning emission disturbances of isoprene oxidation in a tropical forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12715–12734, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12715-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12715-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Schürmann, G., Schäfer, K., Jahn, C., Hoffmann, H., Bauerfeind, M.,
Fleuti, E., and Rappenglück, B.: The impact of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, CO and VOC emissions
on the air quality of Zurich airport, Atmos. Environ., 41, 103–118,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.030</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Setyan, A.  and Jing, W.: Very low emissions of airborne particulate
pollutants measured from two municipal solid waste incineration plants in
Switzerland, Atmos. Environ., 166, 99–109,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.018</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Setyan, A., Flament, P., Locoge, N., Deboudt, K., Riffault, V., Alleman, L.
Y., Schoemaecker, C., Arndt, J., Augustin, P., Healy, R. M., Wenger, J. C.,
Cazier, F., Delbarre, H., Dewaele, D., Dewalle, P., Fourmentin, M.,
Genevray, P., Gengembre, C., Leonardis, T., Marris, H., and Mbengue, S.:
Investigation on the near-field evolution of industrial plumes from
metalworking activities, Sci. Total Environ., 668, 443–456,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.399" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.399</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, J., Zhang, Q., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Y., Ng, N. L., Sun, Y.,
Jayne, J. T., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., and Worsnop, D. R.: Highly time- and
size-resolved characterization of submicron aerosol particles in Beijing
using an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Atmos. Environ., 44, 131–140,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.020</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, H., Yang, T., Jie, L., Pan, X., Ping, C., and
Jayne, J. T.: Characterization of summer organic and inorganic aerosols in
Beijing, China with an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor, Atmos. Environ.,
51, 250–259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Du, W., Fu, P., Wang, Q., Li, J., Ge, X., Zhang, Q., Zhu, C., Ren, L., Xu, W., Zhao, J., Han, T., Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, Z.: Primary and secondary aerosols in Beijing in winter: sources, variations and processes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8309–8329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y.-L., Zhang, Q., Schwab, J. J., Demerjian, K. L., Chen, W.-N., Bae, M.-S., Hung, H.-M., Hogrefe, O., Frank, B., Rattigan, O. V., and Lin, Y.-C.: Characterization of the sources and processes of organic and inorganic aerosols in New York city with a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass apectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1581–1602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1581-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1581-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Taiwo, A. M., Harrison, R. M., and Shi, Z.: A review of receptor
modelling of industrially emitted particulate matter, Atmos. Environ., 97,
109–120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.051</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Tiwari, S., Dahiya, A., and Kumar, N.: Investigation into relationships
among NO, NO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, and CO at an urban background site in Delhi, India,
Atmos. Res., 157, 119–126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.01.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.01.008</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2891–2918, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Weitkamp, E. A., Pancras, L. P. J., Ondov, J. M., Polidori, A., Turpin, B.
J., and Robinson, A. L.: Fine particle emission profile for a large coke
production facility based on highly time-resolved fence line measurements,
Atmos. Environ., 39, 6719–6733, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.06.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.06.028</a>, 2005.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Wong, H. K. T., Banic, C. M., Robert, S., Nejedly, Z., and Campbell, J. L.:
In-stack and in-plume characterization of particulate metals emitted from a
copper smelter, Geochem.-Explor. Env. A., 6, 131–137,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/05-083" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/05-083</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Y., Ge, X., Wang, J., Shen, Y., Ye, Z., Ge, S., Wu, Y., Yu, H., and
Chen, M.: Responses of secondary aerosols to relative humidity and
photochemical activities in an industrialized environment during late
winter, Atmos. Environ., 193, 66–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.008</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Z., Tang, S., Zhang, Z., Liu, C., and Ge, X.: Characterization of PM10
surrounding a cement plant with integrated facilities for co-processing of
hazardous wastes, J. Clean Prod., 186, 831–839,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.178" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.178</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, J. K., Sun, Y., Liu, Z. R., Ji, D. S., Hu, B., Liu, Q., and Wang, Y. S.: Characterization of submicron aerosols during a month of serious pollution in Beijing, 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2887–2903, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via
factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem.,
401, 3045–3067, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
