<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-20-2513-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Molecular compositions and optical properties of dissolved brown carbon in
biomass burning, coal combustion, and vehicle emission aerosols illuminated by
excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry analysis</article-title><alt-title>Molecular compositions and optical properties</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Molecular compositions and optical properties}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.~Tang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Jiao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jun</given-names></name>
          <email>junli@gig.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-1642</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>Tao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Yong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mo</surname><given-names>Yangzhi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6075-3421</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Hongxing</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4146-2765</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>Min</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Bin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Yingjun</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4784-8282</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Jianhui</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9006-263X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Jianzhong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>Ping'an</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Gan</given-names></name>
          <email>zhanggan@gig.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key
Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou
Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University,
Shanghai 200092, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological
Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yantai 264003, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>now at: School of Environmental Science and Engineering,
Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jun Li (junli@gig.ac.cn) and Gan Zhang (zhanggan@gig.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>2</day><month>March</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>2513</fpage><lpage>2532</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>7</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>November</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day><month>January</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e221">Brown carbon (BrC) plays an essential impact on radiative forcing
due to its ability to absorb sunlight. In this study, the optical properties
and molecular characteristics of water-soluble and methanol-soluble organic
carbon (OC; MSOC) emitted from the simulated combustion of biomass and coal
fuels and vehicle emissions were investigated using ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis)
spectroscopy, excitation–emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy, and
Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS)
coupled with electrospray ionization (ESI). The results showed that these
smoke aerosol samples from biomass burning (BB) and coal combustion (CC) had
a higher mass absorption efficiency at 365 nm (MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) than vehicle
emission samples. A stronger MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value was also found in MSOC than
water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC), indicating low polar compounds would
possess a higher light absorption capacity. Parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis
identified six types of fluorophores (P1–6) in WSOC including two
humic-like substances (HULIS-1) (P1 and P6), three protein-like substances
(PLOM) (P2, P3, and P5), and one undefined substance (P4). HULIS-1 was mainly from
aging vehicle exhaust particles; P2 was only abundant in BB aerosols; P3 was
ubiquitous in all tested aerosols; P4 was abundant in fossil burning
aerosols; and P5 was more intense in fresh vehicle exhaust particles. The
MSOC chromophores (six components; C1–6) exhibited consistent
characteristics with WSOC, suggesting the method could be used to indicate
the origins of chromophores. FT-ICR mass spectra showed that CHO and CHON
were the most abundant components of WSOC, but S-containing compounds
appeared in a higher abundance in CC aerosols and vehicle emissions than BB
aerosols, while considerably fewer S-containing compounds largely with CHO
and CHON were detected in MSOC. The unique formulas of different sources in the van Krevelen (VK) diagram presented different molecular distributions.
To be specific, BB aerosols with largely CHO and CHON had a medium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio,  while CC aerosols and vehicle emissions largely with
S-containing compounds had an opposite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. Moreover, the
light absorption capacity of WSOC and MSOC was positively associated with
the unsaturation degree and molecular weight in the source aerosols. The
above results are potentially<?pagebreak page2514?> applicable to further studies on the EEM-based or
molecular-characteristic-based source apportionment of chromophores in
atmospheric aerosols.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e308">Carbonaceous aerosols play an important role in the Earth's radiative
balance. One such aerosol, black carbon (BC), absorbs significant amounts of
light and exerts a warming effect, while organic carbon (OC) was initially
thought to only scatter solar radiation (Wong et al., 2017;  Mo et al.,
2017;  Saleh et al., 2014). However, recent studies show that there are
certain types of OC that absorb radiation efficiently in the
near-ultraviolet (UV) (300–400 nm) and visible ranges, which are called
brown carbon (BrC). They can positively shift the net direct radiation
forcing (DRF) (Saleh et al., 2014;  Laskin et al., 2015; Kirchstetter and
Thatcher, 2012). According to a simulation model, the inclusion of BrC may
enhance total aerosol absorption by 7 %–19 % (Feng et al.,
2013). According to previous studies, BrC in atmospheric aerosols mainly
originates from emissions from biomass burning (BB) and coal combustion
(CC), vehicle exhaust, and the formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA)
(Zhu et al., 2018; Laskin et al., 2015; Xie et al., 2017; Kumar et al.,
2018). Among them, primary emissions contribute significantly to BrC
absorption (Fan et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2011).
Recently, many studies have investigated the optical properties and
molecular characteristics of BrC in laboratory-simulated combustion
(Budisulistiorini et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2018, 2016; Song et
al., 2019) and their light absorption in controlled vehicle emissions
(Xie et al., 2017). However, there were
no available studies on the comprehensive characteristics of BrC in various
sources and their variations in optical and chemical information impacted by
these sources. Therefore, investigating BrC in different sources would
improve our understanding of the evolution of BrC absorption.</p>
      <p id="d1e311">Excitation–emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy can provide structural
information of chromophores and thus has been widely applied to identify the
sources and chemical nature of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM)
in aquatic environments since the 1990s (Shimabuku et al., 2017; Wells et
al., 2017; Bhattacharya and Osburn, 2017; Coble, 1996). As the optical
properties of chromophoric water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) in the
atmosphere were similar to CDOM in aquatic environments (Qin et al.,
2018; Fu et al., 2015; Graber and Rudich, 2006), this technique could extend
to atmospheric research. It has to be mentioned that fluorescence is a
radiative process that occurs between two energy levels of the same
multiplicity (Andrade-Eiroa et al., 2013). Generally, compounds
with rigid planar structures and highly conjugated systems have intrinsic
fluorescence emission characteristics and are important BrC chromophores,
such as aromatic acids, phenols, nitroaromatics, polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs), quinones, and so on (Lin et al., 2018; Zhang et al.,
2013). In addition, chromophores in fluorescence spectra could be considered
as a “fingerprinting” tool, especially when combining it with parallel
factor (PARAFAC) analysis, which can decompose EEM signals into their
underlying chemical components (Murphy et al., 2013). For
instance, Chen et al. (2016b) observed that the water-extracted
chromophores identified by PARAFAC from the urban, forest, and marine
aerosols were varied with the sampling sites and periods and were affected
by oxidative and functional groups. Lee et al. (2013) illustrated
that SOA derived from the oxidation of limonene and decene with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
OH had different fluorescence spectra. Therefore, BrC characteristics from
various sources may differ. However, when analyzing chromophoric BrC using
fluorescence spectra, the challenges are the lack of a classification system
for fluorescence spectra, to distinguish chromophores from most
non-absorbing constituents, and to determine the chemical structures of the
chromophores.</p>
      <p id="d1e325">Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS)
coupled with electrospray ionization (ESI) is a powerful platform for
investigating the detailed characteristics of organic material at the
molecular level. With the advantage of ultrahigh resolution, the accuracy of
mass measurements, and high sensitivity (Feng et al., 2016), FT-ICR MS
has been successfully used to characterize organic aerosols (Jiang et
al., 2016; Song et al., 2018; Mo et al., 2018), cloud water
(Zhao et al., 2013), and natural organic matter (Sleighter
et al., 2012; Feng et al., 2016). For example, a previous study has
determined their molecular families of dissolved organic matter (DOM)
associated with fluorescent components by using FT-ICR MS
(Stubbins et al., 2014), which could provide more
chemical information about chromophores.</p>
      <p id="d1e328">Residential CC and BB emissions and motor vehicle emissions are significant
anthropogenic sources of air pollutants, especially fine particulate
matter (PM) on urban and regional scales (Gentner et al.,
2017; Yan et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2015). In this study,
to obtain a comprehensive understanding of BrC originating from various
sources, ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis), EEM, and FT-ICR MS analyses were performed for WSOC and
methanol-soluble organic carbon (MSOC) from the smoke particles of simulated
combustion of biomass fuels and coals and vehicle emission aerosols.
Statistical analysis of PARAFAC was applied to EEM spectra to resolve the
fluorescent compounds. All of these and unique molecular characteristics of WSOC and
MSOC were analyzed and discussed on the basis of FT-ICR MS. Relationships
between optical properties and chemical structures were discussed by using a
linear regression coefficient.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2515?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sample collection and preparation</title>
      <p id="d1e346">The smoke particles were collected by the instrument coupled with a dilution
channel which was designed to simulate fire emissions representative of
“real-world” open BB and household CC activities (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). In the
present study, a total of 27 BB samples (IDs1–27) were collected at
Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, from 20 May to 3 June 2016, and the
detailed sampling process was described in our previous article
(Cui et al., 2018). Briefly, raw fuels (rough <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were air-dried for several days and ignited in a
stainless-steel bowl, and then the rising smoke was collected through a
dilution system. The sampling system mainly consists of a dilution tunnel, a
residence time chamber, three PM samplers, and so on.
Every biomass was burned three times at about 1–2 kg of fuel per burn. Every
combustion process lasted for 20 min. The collection of smoke particles
started when the fuel ignited, and it ended when the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
down to atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level. Dilution ratios of each experimental
process were calculated using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations before and after
dilution. The collection flow rate and average dilution ratio were 180 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 2.1, respectively. And the other six BB samples (IDs 28–33) were
collected in Guangzhou, Guangdong.</p>
      <p id="d1e420">The smoke particles of CC (IDs 34–50) were collected in the same way as that of the BB
experiment, but they used a stove in Guangzhou, Guangdong, from
18 November 2017 to 23 January 2018. The tested stove is a technically
improved stove (named Jin-Yin stove). Due to the difficulty of ignition of
coal, we used smokeless charcoal to ignite one third (about 300 g) of the
raw-coal chunk (2–5 cm in size) in the stove, removed the charcoal after
ignition, and then added the remaining raw-coal chunk (about 700 g) to start
to collect the smoke particles. Every coal was also burned three times at
about 1 kg of fuel per burn. Every combustion process lasted for about
40–150 min. The collection flow rate and average dilution ratio were
150 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1.5, respectively. Additionally, the modified combustion
efficiency (MCE) was calculated to characterize the relative amount of
smoldering and flaming combustion phase (Lin et al., 2016; Cui et al.,
2018). The average MCE value was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for CC experiments, but it was
unavailable for the BB experiments because the CO sensor did not work in the
field work, which was mentioned in our previous paper (Cui et
al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e447">Tunnel aerosols (total eight samples; IDs 51–58) were collected at the Siping
tunnel from 1 to 2 November 2017 and the Xiaoyang Shan tunnel from 1 to 2 December 2017, in Shanghai and two vehicle exhaust particles
(IDs 59–60) were collected from the direct emission of two different trucks
(more fresh aerosols). With no other instructions, we used “vehicle
emissions” to represent all tunnel aerosols and vehicle exhaust particle
samples. These filters were wrapped in aluminum foil and pre-baked at 450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 5 h before sampling and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
after sampling. Overall, there was a total of 60 total suspended particulate
(TSP) matter samples on source emissions in this study, and blank samples
that were collected at different times and locations were used for
correcting filter samples.</p>
      <p id="d1e478">WSOC for UV–vis absorption and EEM analysis were extracted with purified
water (resistivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) via the ultra sonication of
quartz filter punches for 30 min. Because water cannot effectively
extract the BrC (Liu et al., 2013; Shetty et al., 2019), the remaining
filter was further freeze-dried and extracted with methanol (high-performance liquid chromatography grade; HLPC) to
obtain the MSOC constituent for a better understanding of the optical properties and
molecular compositions of BrC. It is worth noting that the MSOC in this
study is not necessarily like that of the same name in other studies. All
the extracts were filtered through a 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m polytetrafluoroethylene
membrane into amber colored-glass vials to remove the insoluble material.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Carbon analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e509">We measured both OC and elemental carbon (EC) using an aerosol carbon
analyzer (Sunset Laboratory, Inc., USA), following the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) thermal–optical
transmittance (TOT) standard method (Mo et al., 2017), and the emission
factors (EFs) of PM, OC, and EC were calculated, and detailed information was
presented in the Supplement. We also analyzed the elements of biomass (C, H, O,
and N) and coal (C, H, O, N, and S) using an elemental analyzer (Vario EL
cube, Elementar, Germany), and the results were listed in Tables S1 and S2.
The carbon content of WSOC was measured using total organic carbon analysis
(Vario TOC cube, Elementar, Germany) before acidification with phosphoric acid to remove
inorganic carbon, while the concentration of MSOC was assessed using the
method developed by a previous study (Chen et al., 2017b).
Briefly, the extracted MSOC was dried gently under nitrogen and then
re-dissolved in 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L of methanol. Subsequently, 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L of the
solution was added to the clear quartz filter (area of 1.5 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) until dry
and analyzed using the TOT standard method.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e539">Comparison of MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the WSOC fraction of source emission
aerosols with the other studies. The references were listed as
follows: Liu et al., 2018; Mo et al., 2018; Yan et al., 2015; Cheng et al.,
2011; Cheng et al., 2016; Xie et al., 2019; Hecobian et al., 2010; Zhang et al.,
2013; Park et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2019; Fan et al., 2016; Park and Yu,
2016; Chen et al., 2018.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2513/2020/acp-20-2513-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>UV–vis absorption spectra and EEM fluorescence spectra</title>
      <?pagebreak page2516?><p id="d1e565">The UV–vis absorption and EEM spectra of WSOC and MSOC were analyzed using a
UV–vis spectrophotometer (UV-4802, Unico, China) and an Aqualog fluorometer
(HORIBA Scientific, USA), respectively. The wavelengths used to characterize
the UV–vis spectra were between 200 to 800 nm at a step size of 2 nm.
Purified water and methanol were used as a baseline correction for WSOC and
MSOC before measurement, respectively. Mass absorption efficiency (MAE; m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) was obtained from the following equation
(Li et al., 2018):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M27" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>MAE</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the value of light absorption at the given wavelength of
the spectrophotometer, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g C mL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the concentration of WSOC
and MSOC, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the optical path length (in this study, 0.01 m). Moreover, the  pH
of WSOC was measured for all samples within the ranges of 5.5–6.5, which
generally did not affect the absorbance according to the prior study
(Chen et al., 2016a).</p>
      <p id="d1e678">The emission and excitation wavelengths of the fluorescence spectra were
from 245 to 580 nm and 240 to 500 nm, respectively. The wavelength
increments of the emission and excitation scans were 4.66 and 3 nm,
respectively. Further, the contributions of solvents to the fluorescence
spectra were subtracted.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Ultrahigh-resolution ESI FT-ICR MS analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e689">The WSOC and MSOC of six selected samples including two BB aerosols (<italic>Musa</italic>
and <italic>Hevea</italic>), two CC aerosols (a anthracite and a bituminous coal), 1 d of
tunnel aerosol (combining the aerosols in the inlet and outlet of the tunnel in
the same day), and one vehicle exhaust particle sample were analyzed using FT-ICR
MS. To remove inorganic ions before instrumental analysis, WSOC was further
adjusted to a pH of 2 by the addition of hydrochloric acid (HCl) and then
passed through a solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Oasis HLB – hydrophilic-lipophilic balance, 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, 60 mg/cartridge, Waters Corporation, USA). The constituent retained on the SPE
cartridge was eluted with methanol containing 2 % ammonia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Eluants
were evaporated until dry under a gentle nitrogen gas stream. The solutions extracted by methanol were evaporated under a gentle nitrogen gas stream for
preparation.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2517?><p id="d1e718">We used the analysis method of FT-ICR MS described in detail in our previous
study (Mo et al., 2018). Briefly, ultrahigh-resolution mass spectra were
obtained using a solariX XR FT-ICR MS (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen,
Germany) equipped with a 9.4 T superconducting magnet and an ESI ion source.
The system was operated in negative-ionization mode. The ion accumulation
time was set to 0.6 s. The lower and upper mass limit was set to a mass-to-charge ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 150 and
800 Da, respectively. The mass spectra were externally calibrated with
arginine clusters using a linear calibration and then internally
recalibrated with typical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> class species peaks using quadratic
calibration in DataAnalysis version 4.4 (Bruker Daltonics). A typical
mass-resolving power of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">450</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 319 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm
absolute mass error was achieved. The mass spectra of field blank filters
was analyzed to detect possible contamination following the same procedures.
More data processing was presented in Sect. S1 of the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>PARAFAC analysis for EEM spectra</title>
      <p id="d1e790">PARAFAC analysis with non-negativity constraints was used to explore the
fluorescent components in dissolved BrC based on the method established by
the previous studies (Murphy et al., 2013; Andersson and Bro, 2000), which
was performed using the decomposition routines for Excitation Emission Matrices (drEEM) toolbox version 2.0 using MATLAB
(<uri>http://models.life.ku.dk/drEEM</uri>, last access: June 2014). This method had been widely used in the
analysis of fluorescence spectra in aerosols (Chen et al., 2016a, b; Matos et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2019). Absorbance measurements were
used to correct the EEM for inner-filter effects (IFEs) according to the
previous studies (Luciani et al., 2009; Gu and Kenny, 2009; Fu et al.,
2015). The highest light absorbance in the calibrated wavelength range of
WSOC and MSOC was not greater than 2 (mostly below 1 at 254 nm), which was
appropriate for the inner-filter corrections of the EEMs (Gu and Kenny,
2009; Murphy et al., 2013). Each EEM was normalized to the Raman peak area of
purified water collected on the same day to correct fluorescence in Raman
units (RUs) at an excitation of 350 nm and corrected for the dilution factor
(Murphy et al., 2013, 2010). Additionally, the signals of
the first-order and second-order Rayleigh and Raman scattering in the EEM
were removed by an interpolation method (Bahram et al., 2006).
Repeated convergence of the model was examined based on the iteration of the
minimum square principle. The exploration phases of two- to seven-component
PARAFAC models contained an evaluation of the shape of spectral loading,
leverage analysis, an examination of the core consistency, residual
analysis, and split-half analysis (Figs. S2–S7). A six-component PARAFAC
model was identified and successfully passed the split-half validation with
the split style of S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>T<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the WSOC and MSOC in 60
samples, respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Emission characteristics and light absorption of extracts</title>
      <p id="d1e839">The PM, OC, and EC EFs of 27 biomass and 17 coal combustion experiments were
summarized in Table S3. The relevant EFs of some biomass species have been
previously reported (Cui et al., 2018). In this experiment,
the EFs of PM, OC, and EC from 27 types of biomass burning were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel, respectively.
The EFs emitted from bituminous CC (PM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel, OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel, and EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel)
were much higher than those of anthracite combustion (PM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel, OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel, and EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel) in the same stove. These differences could be attributed to the high
volatile matter content of bituminous coal (Tian et al., 2017; Chen et
al., 2005). Note that the CC smoke collection began when the flame had been
ignited with one third of the material, and the rest was added. Therefore,
the results of our study would be lower than the real values.</p>
      <p id="d1e1244">MAE can be used to characterize the efficiency of solar energy absorption,
which is represented by the degree of conjugation and the amount of electron
delocalization in molecules (Chen et al., 2016a). As
shown in Fig. 1 and Table S4, MAE at 365 nm (MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) was
significantly higher in the case of BB and CC aerosols than in vehicle
emissions in this study, consistent with the previous findings (Xie et
al., 2017; Fan et al., 2016). Bituminous CC aerosols had higher MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values than anthracite combustion aerosols. Here, we introduced the EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC
ratios, which could be used as an indicator of fire conditions
(Xie et al., 2017). Figure S8 showed the
MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of WSOC vs. EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC relationships for all BB and CC aerosols. The
data clearly showed that the WSOC light absorption of BB aerosols was
dependent on combustion conditions. However, a weak relationship
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in CC aerosols suggested another factor might influence
the light absorption, such as maturity (Li et
al., 2018). Compared to WSOC, higher MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values were observed in the
MSOC collected from BB (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and bituminous CC
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) aerosols. This could be due to the fact
that these strongly light-absorbing fat-soluble components are likely to be PAHs of a
large molecular weight and quinones from BB and fossil fuel combustion
(Sun et al., 2007; Chen and Bond, 2010), which were more soluble in a
low-polarity solution, but we obtained the opposite results in the case of
anthracite combustion and vehicle emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e1377">The MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of WSOC in this study was compared with the other studies
(Fig. 1). The BB aerosols in this study had a higher MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value
than those in other controlled BB experiments, while it was comparable to
corn straw burning emissions (Park and Yu, 2016; Fan et al., 2016).
Further, the simulated BB aerosols exhibited a higher MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value than
those in highly BB-impacted areas (Hecobian et al., 2010),
indicating that the aging in the transport process could reduce the light
absorption (Dasari et al., 2019). The CC aerosols showed a higher
MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value than the other coal experiments (Li et al., 2018; Fan et
al., 2016), while comparable values to water-soluble BrC were observed in
winter of Beijing (Cheng et al., 2011; Yan et al., 2015). The result
indicated the strong influence of BrC in this season in this region. In
addition, the simulated combustion aerosols in this study exhibited higher
MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values than the other areas (such as Guangzhou, Nanjing, Los
Angeles, South Korea, Nepal, and so on) (see Fig. 1).</p>
      <?pagebreak page2518?><p id="d1e1425">Methanol has a lower polarity than water and can extract the water-insoluble
compounds that are generally stronger chromophores. Chen et al. (2017b) extracted organic matters in aerosols using different polar
solutions, and they found water-insoluble organic matter (WIOM) had a
higher MAE value than the water-soluble organic matter (WSOM), consistent
with our result for the BB and bituminous CC aerosols. Vehicle emission
aerosols generally had a lower MAE value such as methanol-soluble BrC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) in the controlled emission experiment
(Xie et al., 2017), which was comparable
to WSOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) but higher than MSOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>EEM spectra of WSOC and MSOC</title>
      <p id="d1e1536">Fluorescence spectra was used to characterize the organic chromophores of
different sources. We applied the PARAFAC model (Murphy et al.,
2013) to determine the underlying chromophore components of the 60 source
samples. Six typically independent components (abbreviated P1–6) in WSOC
were resolved, as shown in the top of Fig. 2 and Table 1. Compared to the
previous studies, the fluorescence of P1 and P6 were similar to those of
7CM–C1 (the C1 component of a seven-component model) and 7CM–C3, named
humic-like substances (HULIS-1) (Chen et al., 2016b). Further, there were
peaks in the emission wavelengths (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) of P1 and P6, which
were probably derived from conjugated systems (Chen et al., 2016b). The
peak of the P3 component was mostly located in the region categorized as
protein-like (cytidine) or tryptophan-like fluorophore (Qin et al.,
2018; Fan et al., 2016). Generally, peaks at shorter excitation wavelengths
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) and shorter emission wavelengths (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) were
associated with simple aromatic proteins such as tyrosine (Cory and
Mcknight, 2005), which was similar to the fluorescence of the P2 component
observed in this study. The P5 component was similar to tryptophan- and
tyrosine-like components (Chen et al., 2017a).
Therefore, the P2, P3, and P5 components were named protein-like substances
(PLOM). The P4 component was reported relatively rarely but was similar to
previously observed peaks that were considered to arise mainly in surface
water and algal secretions (Yu et al., 2015). It
is worth noting that the origins and chemical structures of the chromophores
studied are not necessarily like those of chromophores with the same name
in other types of organic matter.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1572">The maximum excitation and emission wavelengths of the PARAFAC
components in WSOC and MSOC extracted from the three origins.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PARAFAC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Excitation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Emission</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Assignment according to</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">References</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">component</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">maxima (nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">maxima (nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">published papers</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WSOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">P1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">251, 314</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">415</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">HULIS-1, terrestrial</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Chen et al. (2016b);</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">humic-like component</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Sgroi et al. (2017);</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">Fu et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">P2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">254</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">337</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">Tyrosine-like</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">Cory and Mcknight (2005)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">P3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">287</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">360</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Protein-like (cytidine) or</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Qin et al. (2018);</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">tryptophan-like</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">Fan et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">P4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">251</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">374</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">P5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">278</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">319</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">Protein-like fluorophores</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">Fu et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">P6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">254, 371</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">485</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">HULIS-1, conjugated systems,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Chen et al. (2016b)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">a terrestrial humic-like or</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">fulvic-acid-like component</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MSOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">C1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">308</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">356</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">C2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 272</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">388</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">434</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Component 2 for the urban</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Matos et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">ASOM samples</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">C4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">257</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">360</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">C5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">284</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">328</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">269</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">310</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2020">The EEM components identified by PARAFAC of WSOC (P1–6) and
MSOC (C1–6) from the three origins. Em.: emission wavelength. Ex.: excitation wavelength.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2513/2020/acp-20-2513-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2030">The results from the six-component model (abbreviated C1–6) of MSOC
identified by PARAFAC, as described in the bottom of Table 1 and Fig. 2,
were different from those observed in WSOC, indicating MSOC contained
different compound types from WSOC after water extraction. The peak of the C1
component was similar to that of the P3 component of WSOC, but the excitation
wavelength was higher than that of the P3 component. The higher excitation
wavelength indicated the presence of conjugated unsaturated bond systems
shifting towards the high wavelengths of the C1 component
(Matos et al., 2015). Moreover, as reported, the C3
component was similar to component 2 of urban alkaline-soluble organic
matter (ASOM) collected from the city of Aveiro, Portugal
(Matos et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e2033">The maximum fluorescence intensity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated by multiplying
the maximum excitation loading and maximum emission loading for each
component by its score (Murphy et al., 2013). Generally, changes
in the relative abundance of a component (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) could
indicate changes in its overall importance, which had been successfully
applied to study the origins of chromophores (Yan and Kim, 2017; Chen et
al., 2017a, b; Wu et al., 2019). In this study, the relative
abundances of fluorescent components in different types of samples  were
highly variable, depending on the sources (Fig. 3a). The P1 component
accounted for an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the total fluorescence
intensities in the case of tunnel aerosols, which was higher than BB
aerosols (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), CC aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), and vehicle exhaust particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). The difference
of the P1 component between tunnel aerosols and vehicle exhaust particles
indicated that the P1 component had an aged vehicle exhaust origin. In contrast, the
fluorescence of the P6 component was weak in all the samples, but higher in
vehicle emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) than in BB and CC aerosols (both
2.5 %). The P5 component was more intense in vehicle exhaust particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) than in other sources. The P2 component was abundant only in BB
aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), but not in vehicle emissions, which suggested
that some structures responsible for this chromophore could not exist in
vehicle emissions. The P4 component was the more abundant chromophore in CC
aerosols (34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.7 %) and vehicle emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), especially in vehicle exhaust particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). In
contrast, the P4 component in BB aerosols was weak (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %),
indicating a fossil origin. The P3 component was almost equal across all
samples. The possible reason was that the P3 component was similar to the peak
of tryptophan-like compounds which were common in practically all published
models and were likely to be found in almost all sources
(Yu et al., 2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2205">The relative contributions of each PARAFAC component of WSOC <bold>(a)</bold> and MSOC <bold>(b)</bold> from the three sources.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2513/2020/acp-20-2513-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2220">The relative intensities of fluorescent components in MSOC exhibited similar
characteristics to WSOC (Fig. 3b). The C1 component was the most intense substance in the case of BB aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) compared to the
other sources. The C2 component was enriched in BB aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and tunnel aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) compared to those in CC
aerosols and vehicle exhaust particles. In addition, C2 exhibited a
difference between bituminous CC and anthracite combustion aerosols, as well
as tunnel aerosols and vehicle exhaust particles, indicating that the C2 component
could be used to identify these sources. The C4 component was intense in CC
aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and vehicle emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). The C3
component was not abundant among the three sources and not observed in the
vehicle exhaust particles, not suggesting a fresh vehicle exhaust<?pagebreak page2519?> emission
origin. The C5 and C6 components were more intense in vehicle exhaust particles
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, respectively), suggesting they
were the primary vehicle emission chromophores. The last study observed that
the relative abundances of various chromophores in aerosols with different
particle sizes were different (Chen et al., 2019). Therefore, the
fluorescence technique is sensitive for chromophores with different sources,
sizes, and chemical structures, and so on. In summary, the variation of the
fluorescent components from different sources obtained by EEM–PARAFAC method
could be helpful to the source apportionment of BrC in environmental
applications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Molecular composition detected by FT-ICR MS</title>
      <p id="d1e2316">The molecular compositions of WSOC and MSOC extracted from BB and CC
aerosols and vehicle emissions were determined by negative ESI-FT-ICR MS.
ESI is a soft ionization method, and it can only ionize polar organic
compounds and hydrophilic molecules (Wozniak et al., 2008),
but nonpolar or less polar compounds such as polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons and saturated hydrocarbons are not easily ionized by ESI
(Lin et al., 2018). In addition, ESI- cannot
detect the N-heterocyclic alkaloid compounds (Laskin et al., 2009). Thus,
this study mainly discussed these readily ionizable polar organic compounds
by ESI-.</p>
      <p id="d1e2319">Figure 4 showed the reconstructed negative-ion ESI FT-ICR mass spectra of
WSOC for the six selected samples. Lots of peaks with intensive mass
ranges between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 and 600 were showed in the mass spectra, with the
most massive numbers of ions within the ranges of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 200–400.
Additionally, more formulas were detected in BB aerosols (total of 7708) than
CC aerosols (5305) and vehicle emissions (4047) (Table 2), suggesting a
higher observed chemical complexity (i.e., the observed peaks). According to
the intensity of each ion, the average molecular formulas of WSOC in the six
aerosol samples were calculated and listed as follows:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.99</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.65</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.37</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.52</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.65</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <italic>Musa</italic>, <italic>Hevea</italic>,
anthracite, bituminous coal, tunnel, and vehicle exhaust, respectively. The
BB aerosols had higher contents of C and H, while the CC aerosols and tunnel
aerosol had higher contents of S.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2542">Number of formulas in each compound category and the average values
of elemental ratios, molecular weight (MW), double-bond equivalents (DBE),
and modified aromaticity index (AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in WSOC from the six aerosol samples.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Samples</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Elemental</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">DBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">DBE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">composition</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">formulas</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Musa</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4534</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">372.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1504</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">367.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2375</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">384.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHOS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">329</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">320.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHONS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">323</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">358.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Hevea</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3174</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">387.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1610</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">377.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.51</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1408</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">409.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHOS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">108</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">376.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHONS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">410.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.30</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Anthracite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3930</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">308.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">283.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1808</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">323.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.69</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHOS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">464</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">308.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHONS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">668</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">332.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bituminous coal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1375</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">282.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">399</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">259.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">411</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">267.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHOS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">302</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">324.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.57</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHONS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">263</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">299.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tunnel</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2746</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">317.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">803</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">298.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.54</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1049</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">340.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHOS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">508</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">310.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHONS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">386</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">337.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vehicle exhaust</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1301</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">327.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.46</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">561</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">311.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.46</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">673</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">320.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHOS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">467.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHONS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">438.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3628">In this study, these identified molecular formulas were classified into four
main compound groups based on their compositions: CHO, CHON, CHOS, and
CHONS. CHO compounds refer to the compounds that contain carbon, hydrogen,
oxygen, and the other compound groups that are defined analogously. The
relative abundances of the four compound groups were calculated by the
magnitude of each peak divided by the sum of magnitudes of all identified
peaks and showed in Fig. 4. CHO was the most abundant component in WSOC,
accounting for 43 %–69 % of the total intensities of BB aerosols,
36 %–37 % of CC aerosols, and 36 %–47 % of vehicle emissions,
respectively. CHO values in BB and CC aerosols were lower than those of mass
spectra from simulated combustion experiments (BB of 53 %–72 % and CC of  43 %; Song et al., 2018). Generally,
CHO formulas were consistent with species reported previously as
lignin-pyrolysis products (Fleming et al., 2017), and they detected
this fraction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % in brushwood <italic>chulha</italic> cook firers. CHON
was abundant in the three sources. This result was different from the
findings that CHON species had a higher percentage in BB smoke and were not
abundant in CC smoke (Song et al., 2018).
The high fraction of CHON in CC aerosols could be due to that the
N-containing compounds in the BB smoke <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coming from the nitrogen
content in the fuels (Coggon et al., 2016), and the
contents in coal fuels were comparable to biomass fuels (See Tables S1 and
S2). However, S-containing compounds were more abundant in CC aerosols
(9.2 %–21 % for CHOS and 13 %–20 % for CHONS, respectively) and
tunnel aerosol (24 %<?pagebreak page2521?> for CHOS and 16 % for CHONS, respectively) than
those in BB aerosols (2.0 %–5.6 % for CHOS and 0.62 %–3.7 % for
CHONS, respectively) and vehicle exhaust particle (7.5 % for CHOS and
0.25 % for CHONS, respectively), consistent with the previous studies
(Song et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2017). ESI was more efficient in ionizing
S-containing compounds and most of them were selectively ionized by ESI-,
suggesting that they were polar species such as organosulfates
(Lin et al., 2018). Our study reported that
S-containing compounds in WSOC were associated with CC emissions by
combining with carbon isotope data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) (Mo et al., 2018).
Furthermore, the relative abundances of group species in CC aerosols and
tunnel aerosol were similar to those of water extracts in the hazy day
(Jiang et al., 2016), indicating both sources could be
important contributors of haze. However, differences between tunnel aerosol
and vehicle exhaust particles were observed, indicating S-containing
compounds in the tunnel aerosol were more secondary formation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3668">Negative ESI FT-ICR mass spectra of WSOC from the six aerosol
samples. Different formula groups were color-coded. The six pie charts
showed the relative intensities of different formula groups.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2513/2020/acp-20-2513-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3677">Van Krevelen (VK) diagrams are a useful tool that provides a visual graphic
display of compound distribution, and to some extent, are used to qualitatively
identify different composition domains in organic mixtures (Song et al.,
2018; Lv et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2009). In this study, each source showed
similar VK patterns. As shown in Fig. S9, <italic>Musa</italic> and <italic>Hevea</italic> burning had a VK
diagram similar to that of WSOC in straw burning and fog water
(Schmitt-Kopplin et al., 2010; Mazzoleni et al., 2010). S-containing
compounds in tunnel aerosol with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were similar to the
aerosol-derived WSOC in New York and Virginia (Wozniak et
al., 2008). Six dominate domains were identified in WSOC, including lignins,
carbohydrates, tannins, proteins, condensed aromatic, and unsaturated
hydrocarbons. In addition, results showed that compounds observed in CC aerosols
had lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios than those in BB aerosols and vehicle
emissions, indicating a higher unsaturated degree and lower oxidation level.
There were compounds outside the specified regions, which had a high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and DBE of 0, corresponding to saturated oxygenated species, and there could be some long-chain polyalcohols (Lin et
al., 2012a).</p>
      <p id="d1e3767">The mass spectra of MSOC exhibited differences from WSOC (Fig. S10),
especially in BB aerosols and vehicle emissions that exhibited larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in
the range of 350–600. The detected formulas in MSOC were much lower than
those in WSOC, with the total number of 4502, 3628, and 1069 for BB, CC, and
vehicle emission aerosols, respectively (Table S5). The reason could be that ESI- can efficiently ionize the polar compounds, and the methanol
extracts after water-extracted may contain more moderate- and low-polarity
compounds that were not easily ionized. The average molecular formulas were
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46.2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.27</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.18</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.01</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44.1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.70</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.86</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of MSOC in the six
aerosol samples, respectively, showing higher C and H content than their
corresponding formulas of WSOC but a decreasing trend in O content.</p>
      <p id="d1e3969">CHO and CHON were the main components in MSOC, accounting for about 90 %
of the total intensities (CHO plus CHON). CHO was the most abundant category
observed in BB aerosols (78 %–80 %). The elemental compositions
observed in CC aerosols were different between bituminous coal and
anthracite combustion. The abundance of CHON in anthracite combustion was
higher (73 %), while the CHO in bituminous combustion was higher (60 %),
which was consistent with the corresponding WSOC. It might be due to a<?pagebreak page2522?> higher
N content and lower O content of anthracite than that of bituminous coal
(see Table S2). However, CHON in BB aerosols (18 %–20 %) exhibited
lower abundances than those in CC aerosols and vehicle emissions.
S-containing compounds were not abundant in MSOC. It may be due to the
combination of an S element and an O atom showing higher polarity.</p>
      <p id="d1e3973">Figure S11 showed the VK diagram of MSOC in the six aerosol samples. More
formulas in BB aerosols exhibited two distinct groups with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.4–2.2
and 0.6–1.4 vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.1–0.5 in three domains (lignins, proteins, and
lipids). Compounds in CC aerosols with lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were
dominant in the domains of lignins and condensed aromatic, especially in
bituminous CC aerosol with more unsaturated hydrocarbon. Tunnel aerosol
showed a wide range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in S-containing compounds and a wide range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in non-S-containing compounds. In contrast, compounds in vehicle exhaust
particles had a wide range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but a narrow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. The VK diagram with
fewer S-containing compounds in vehicle exhaust particle showed a similar
characteristic to the distribution of non-S-containing compounds in tunnel
aerosol, indicating the difference was mainly due to the S-containing
compounds.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2523?><p id="d1e4089">Tables 2 and S5 presented the relative abundance of weighted molecular weight
(MW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), double-bond equivalence (DBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and modified aromaticity
index (AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) of WSOC and MSOC, respectively. DBE was used as a
measure of the unsaturated level in a molecule, and AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> could be used to
estimate the fraction of aromatic and condensed aromatic structures (Song
et al., 2018; Lv et al., 2016; Koch and Dittmar, 2006). BB aerosols had higher
MW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values than CC and vehicle emissions in WSOC. Further, higher
DBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values were observed in CC aerosols than the
others. MSOC had higher MW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> but lower AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values than the
corresponding WSOC. Furthermore, CHO and CHON compounds had higher DBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values than S-containing substances, consistent with the
earlier results (Lin et al., 2012a, b).</p>
      <p id="d1e4207">Figure S12 showed the fraction of AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of WSOC in the six
aerosol samples, where the formulas were classified according to their
AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (aliphatic – AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, olefinic – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AI</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and aromatic – AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The results
illustrated that the fraction of the aromatic structure in non-S-containing
compounds was higher than those in S-containing compounds. CC aerosols had a
higher aromatic fraction than BB aerosols and vehicle emissions, especially
in CHO and CHON (up to 89 % of total ion intensities). In BB aerosols, the
non-S-containing compounds had a high fraction of the olefinic structure,
followed by the aromatic structure, but the S-containing compounds had a higher
aliphatic and olefinic structure than the aromatic structure. A higher fraction
of the aliphatic structure in vehicle emissions was observed in the S-containing compounds
(especially in tunnel aerosol; exceeding 81 %). These aliphatic S-containing
compounds might form by the precursors (long-chain alkanes) from vehicle
emissions (Tao et al., 2014), which had higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and<?pagebreak page2524?> lower DBE values
(see Table 2). However, the previous study showed that AI must be regarded
as the most conservative approach and may result in an underestimate of the
aromatic structures (Koch and Dittmar, 2006), which was
observed in Beijing aerosols (Mo et al., 2018). Although AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
identified more compounds as aromatic and condensed aromatic components than
AI, the AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> may introduce uncertainties for individual molecules,
which was demonstrated by Koch and Dittmar (2006).</p>
      <p id="d1e4314">For MSOC, the aromatic structure fractions in non-S-containing compounds
were higher than those in S-containing compounds, and the aromatic structure
fractions in CC aerosols were higher than those in BB aerosols and vehicle
emissions (Fig. S13), which was consistent with WSOC. Furthermore, we
found that the fraction of the aliphatic structure in MSOC was higher than that in WSOC,
indicating more fat-like compounds.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Different chemical characteristics of BB, CC, and vehicle emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e4324">Figure S14 shows the plotted Venn diagram of formulas in WSOC in the six aerosol
samples for determining the unique elements in the mass spectra. The
previous study identified the unique elements of water-soluble HULIS in
simulated BB and CC smokes, which presented different molecular
characteristics between biomasses, as well as between biomass and coal
(Song et al., 2018). In this study, we
combined more formulas of different sources to determine the unique
molecules, and more limitations were set, which would provide more identified
characteristics for each source. A total of 212 molecular formulas were detected
simultaneously in the six aerosol samples. It is worth noting that without any
further information, it is not possible to decide whether these common
formulas represent the same compounds. Of 212, there were 112 unique
molecules of CHO and 98 of CHON but only 2 of CHOS. CHO compounds
were relatively small aromatic compounds with 8–20 C atoms and 3–8 O
atoms with DBE values of 5–13 and multiple acidic polar functional groups (Fig. S15). It is noting that lines in Fig. S15 indicate DBE reference values of
linear conjugated polyenes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a DBE value of 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C and
fullerene-like hydrocarbons with a DBE value of 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C, where the data
points inside this region are potential BrC chromophores
(Lin et al., 2018). For example, organic acids
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; DBE of 6) were detected in urban <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Yassine et al., 2012), as well as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (6), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (8), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (7), which allowed them to ionize in the ESI mode and were identified as potential BrC chromophores. In total, all of the
CHON compounds had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2.5–8) (Fig. S15), allowing for the assignment of at least one nitro (-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or
nitrooxy (-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) group and other oxygen-containing groups (i.e., -<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">COOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>). Except for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (DBE of 0), the remaining
compounds with DBE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 were suggested as nitro-aromatic and nitrophenol
derivatives (Mo et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2018). CHOS species only had two
formulas including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(2). It was reported that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> groups were the most abundant species
class in CHOS identified in water extracts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Jiang et
al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e4637">There were more observed unique peaks of WSOC in BB aerosols (total of 1947)
compared to CC aerosols (1583) and vehicle emissions (813). However, only
143 and 83 molecular were identified in bituminous CC and vehicle exhaust
particles, respectively. Among the observed compounds, 1353 and 1440 unique
molecular formulas were detected in the combustion of <italic>Musa</italic> and anthracite,
respectively, implying a significant difference from the others. Figure 5a showed the VK diagram of these unique formulas of WSOC for each sample,
where four regions were circled for representing different sources. The
results indicated that these unique compounds in different sources had a
distinctive chemical characteristic. That may be the reason that resulted in
variable fluorescent spectra in different sources (discussed above).
Additionally, the diagram showed that the unique molecules in CC aerosols
were located in the region with lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, and vehicle emissions
containing tunnel aerosol and vehicle exhaust particles were located in two
distinct regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e4671">Figure 6 showed plots of the DBE vs. the number of carbon atoms in the
unique molecular formulas of all aerosol samples. These compounds observed
in BB aerosols were largely CHO and CHON (CHO and CHON of 88 %–93 %)
with C numbers ranging from 6 to 40 and DBE ranging from 0 to 31, with no
regular distribution. S-containing compounds were the important components
in the unique molecular formulas of CC aerosols (CHOS and CHONS of
38 %–75 %) and vehicle emissions (CHOS and CHONS of 41 %–66 %).
However, only 7 %–12 % of the total unique molecular formulas were
observed in BB aerosols. As shown in Fig. 6, the region marked by a blue box
denote the high intensities of compounds in unique formulas of each sample.
The high-intensity compounds detected in <italic>Musa</italic>-burning aerosol mainly had a C
number from 14 to 24, DBE from 7 to 13, and 2 N atoms, such as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (9), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (8),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (10), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (8),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (9), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (7),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (11), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (11),
and so on. Instead of <italic>Musa</italic>, the abundant compounds in <italic>Hevea</italic> burning were
mainly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (14), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (15), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (16), and so on. Although the difference between
burning of <italic>Musa</italic> and <italic>Hevea</italic> appeared, the VK diagram (Fig. 5) did not show
distinct changes. The high-intensity compounds in anthracite combustion with
lower C atoms than in bituminous CC were mainly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(12), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (8), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (9),
while in bituminous CC was mainly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (15) and its
homolog of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (15) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (12).
The abundant compounds in tunnel aerosol had a lower unsaturation degree,
such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1), or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1). In vehicle exhaust particles, the high intensity
of compounds<?pagebreak page2525?> was one fraction with few C atoms and a low DBE value
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (3) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (4)) and the
other fraction with many C atoms and a high DBE value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (16),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (14)). These findings are essential because these
unique molecular formulas in different sources may have specific chemical
composition, which would help the source apportionment of aerosols.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e5279">A van Krevelen diagram of WSOC <bold>(a)</bold> and MSOC <bold>(b)</bold> from the six
aerosol samples. Different color indicates unique formulas detected in each
sample.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2513/2020/acp-20-2513-2020-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5294">Compared to WSOC, Fig. S16 showed fewer compounds in common in MSOC for
the six aerosol samples. There were only 44 compounds common to the six
aerosol samples. A total of 26 and 14 of the 44 formulas were CHO and CHON,
respectively, but only 4 of the 44 formulas were S-containing compounds. As
shown in Fig. S17, there were only three compounds
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (13), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (12), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (13)) in the CHO group and one compound
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (10)) in the CHON group inside the potential BrC
region. The remaining compounds had a high C number (18–35), few O atoms
(1–7), and low DBE (0–2), suggesting that they mostly had fatty acid
structures.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5382">DBE vs. C number for unique molecular compounds of WSOC from the
six aerosol samples. Lines indicate DBE reference values of linear
conjugated polyenes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with DBE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C and
fullerene-like hydrocarbons with DBE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C. The regions marked
by a blue box denote the high intensities of compounds.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2513/2020/acp-20-2513-2020-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5440">These unique molecules in the VK diagram also showed similar results compared
to WSOC (Fig. 5b), further confirming the special characters in
different sources. Expect for tunnel aerosol (about 50 %), these unique
formulas in the BB aerosols, CC aerosols, and vehicle exhaust particle were
dominated by the CHO and CHON groups (Fig. S18). The high-intensity compounds
were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1) for <italic>Musa</italic>
burning;  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (16) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (16) for
<italic>Hevea</italic> burning;  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (10) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (12) for anthracite combustion;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (16), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (16), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (18) for
bituminous CC;  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (4), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1) for tunnel aerosol; and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (7) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0) for vehicle
exhaust particles, respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Link of molecular compositions and optical properties</title>
      <p id="d1e5766">In the above statements, we discussed the light absorption and fluorescence
properties from aerosols in the three different sources. The light
absorption capacity of WSOC and MSOC was essential to assess the evolution
of BrC, and fluorescence spectra were sensitive to different sources and
could help for the source apportionment of BrC. In addition, we evaluated
the molecular compositions of the three sources. Therefore, understanding
the factors affecting the optical properties of BrC is important. It was
reported that the MAE value in the BB experiments depended largely on burning
conditions (Chen and Bond., 2010), and in the CC
experiments it depended on coal maturity (Li et al.,
2018). Chen et al. (2017b) illustrated that the higher light
absorption capacity was associated with the low- and medium-polarity
fractions that contained aromatic and polar functional groups (O or both O
and N atoms). Sources play an important role in light absorption capacity,
consistent with our current study. The MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of WSOC in highly
BB-impacted areas were 2 times higher than in lowly BB-impacted areas in the
southeastern United States (Hecobian et al., 2010).
Atmospheric aging has a significant effect on the light absorption capacity
of BrC (Li et al., 2019), but the mechanism involved is very
complex. The response of the light absorption capacity of different types of
BrC to aging is highly variable, and enhancement or reduction in the light
absorption capacity of BrC is possible (Li et al., 2019). These
results indicated that light absorption capacity might be affected by
various factors. In this study, the higher MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values were observed
in BB and CC aerosols than vehicle emissions, and the chemical structures
and unsaturation degree of different sources were discussed. Next, we
further discussed the relationship between optical properties and chemical
structures below.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2526?><p id="d1e5787">Before discussing their relationship, we firstly determined the compounds
that were potentially able to absorb light radiation based on the above statement
to reduce the influence of non-absorbing substances (Lin et al., 2018).
Mo et al. (2018) reported that MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of HULIS in aerosols was
affected by oxidation level and unsaturation degree. In this study, the
MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value had no significant correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that light
absorption capacity does not appear to be affected by their oxidized
properties in the source emission aerosols. Instead of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value
had a significant positive correlation with the average DBE and MW,
respectively (Fig. 7), suggesting the unsaturation level and MW played a
vital role in the light absorption capacity of source samples. Field
experiments indicated that the majority of absorption was the larger
molecules (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Da) (Di
Lorenzo et al., 2017). It is crucial to understand the relationship between
light absorption of the source samples and their molecular compositions due to
the compounds in fresh emissions that may undergo a secondary process and
introduce more uncertainty for their optical properties.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e5858">Relationships between DBE and MW of the potential BrC molecules
and the MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of WSOC <bold>(a, c)</bold> and MSOC <bold>(b, d)</bold> from the six aerosol
samples, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/2513/2020/acp-20-2513-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5883">Fluorescence spectra can provide more information than UV–vis spectra. A red
shift in the excitation–emission maximum could indicate increased
aromaticity and higher molecular weight (Ghidotti et al., 2017). Field
observations have demonstrated that chromophore components were associated
with chemical structures (Chen et al., 2016a, b; Stubbins
et al., 2014). Chen et al. (2016b) illustrated that the fluorescent
components of HULIS-1 and HULIS-2 were correlated positively with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> groups ions, respectively, using the correlation
analysis of the relative intensities of ion groups in high-resolution
aerosol mass spectrometers (HR-AMSs) and the relative content of<?pagebreak page2527?> fluorescence
components. In another study, Chen et al. (2016a)
demonstrated that fluorescent components had strong links with chemical
groups in the Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra, including the
oxygenated functional groups (nonacidic carbonyl C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O and carboxylic COOH
groups), aliphatic C-H group, amine C-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and alcohol C-OH groups. The
chromophores are sensitive to sources, and it is very important to
understand the molecular composition of chromophores for the classification and
source apportionment of atmospheric BrC. However, the ESI- cannot ionize
the most typical BrC chromophores such as O-heterocyclic PAHs (O-PAHs) or
N-heterocyclic PAHs (N-PAHs) (Lin et al., 2018),
which was not enough to discuss the relationship between the fluorescence
spectra and molecular composition. The combination of atmospheric pressure
photoionization (APPI+ and APPI-) and ESI (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) may provide more
ionizable compounds, but these techniques were not within the scope of our
study.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e5993">We conducted comprehensive measurements on light absorption, fluorescence,
and molecular compositions of dissolved BrC derived from smoke particles
during the simulated combustion of biomass and coal as well as vehicle
emission aerosols. We observed that BB and CC aerosols had higher MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values than vehicle emissions, on average, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C for BB,
anthracite combustion, bituminous CC, and vehicle emission aerosols,
respectively. In addition, BrC emitted from BB (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C) and bituminous CC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C) in MSOC
exhibited stronger light absorption capacity than those in WSOC, but
opposite results were found in anthracite combustion aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C) and vehicle emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C). EEM combining with PARAFAC analysis determined six types of
fluorescent components that were categorized as two HULIS-1 substances (P1 and P6), three
PLOM substances (P2, P3, and P5), and one undefined (P4) substance in WSOC from the three
sources. The relative intensities of the fluorescent components mainly
depended on the different types of sources. For example, HULIS-1 was
abundant in tunnel aerosols; P2 was more intense in BB aerosols but not
observed in vehicle emissions; P4 was intense in CC aerosols and vehicle
emissions; P5 was more abundant in fresh vehicle exhaust particles;  although
P3 was not abundant, it was ubiquitous in all tested aerosols. Similar to
WSOC, six fluorescent components were identified in MSOC. Although the
methanol-soluble chromophores were poorly understood, different
characteristics were observed in different sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e6209">FT-ICR mass spectra showed the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the compounds with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 200–400 in WSOC and an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 350–600 in MSOC (except for CC aerosols),
respectively. CHO and CHON were the main components in the six aerosol
samples, but S-containing compounds were more abundant in CC and tunnel
aerosols than BB aerosols and vehicle exhaust particles in WSOC. Similarly,
MSOC mainly contained CHO and CHON species but fewer S-containing<?pagebreak page2528?> compounds.
BB aerosols had higher CHO species in MSOC but showed lower CHON than CC
aerosols and vehicle emissions. The VK diagram showed that CC aerosols had a higher
unsaturation degree and lower oxidation level than the other two sources. This
finding was further confirmed by a higher fraction of aromatics in CC
aerosols. Unique formulas determined by the Venn diagram showed certain specific
chemical characteristics in the VK diagram. BB aerosols emitted unique formulas
with more CHO and CHON (88 %–93 %), while CC aerosols and vehicle
emissions contained more S-containing compounds (38 %–75 % and
41 %–46 %, respectively). The relationship between optical properties
and chemical structures showed the light absorption capacity was positively
associated with an unsaturation degree and MW in the source emission
samples. Our study illustrated the important roles of sources in
light-absorbing BrC and molecular compositions and the EEMs-based and
molecular-characteristic-based method for the classification and source
apportionment of chromophores in atmospheric aerosols.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6253">The data used in this study are available upon request. Please contact Gan
Zhang (zhanggan@gig.ac.cn) and Jun Li (junli@gig.ac.cn).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e6256">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2513-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2513-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6265">JT, GZ, JL, and YC designed the experiment. JT and MC carried out the
measurements and analyzed the data. JT, TS, YH, and HJ organized and
performed the samplings. JT (Jianhui Tang) and BJ supported the fluorescence
and FT-ICR MS instruments. JT wrote the paper. JL, YM, JS, PP, and GZ
reviewed and commented on the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6271">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6277">This is contribution no. IS-2811 from GIGCAS.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6282">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41430645 and 41773120), the National Key R&amp;D Program of China (grant no. 2017YFC0212000), the International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. 132744KYSB20170002), and the Guangdong Foundation for Program of Science and Technology
Research (grant no. 2017B030314057).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6288">This paper was edited by Alex Lee and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andersson, C. A. and Bro, R.: The N-way Toolbox for MATLAB, Chemom.
Intell. Lab. Syst., 52, 1–4,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7439(00)00071-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0169-7439(00)00071-x</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andrade-Eiroa, Á., Canle, M., and Cerdá, V.: Environmental
Applications of Excitation-Emission Spectrofluorimetry: An In-Depth Review
I, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., 48, 1–49,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2012.692104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/05704928.2012.692104</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bahram, M., Bro, R., Stedmon, C., and Afkhami, A.: Handling of Rayleigh and
Raman scatter for PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence data using interpolation,
J. Chemom., 20, 99–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.978" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cem.978</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bhattacharya, R. and Osburn, C. L.: Multivariate Analyses of Phytoplankton
Pigment Fluorescence from a Freshwater River Network, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 51, 6683–6690, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b05880</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Budisulistiorini, S. H., Riva, M., Williams, M., Chen, J., Itoh, M.,
Surratt, J. D., and Kuwata, M.: Light-Absorbing Brown Carbon Aerosol
Constituents from Combustion of Indonesian Peat and Biomass, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 51, 4415–4423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00397" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b00397</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, H., Liao, Z. L., Gu, X. Y., Xie, J. Q., Li, H. Z., and Zhang, J.:
Anthropogenic Influences of Paved Runoff and Sanitary Sewage on the
Dissolved Organic Matter Quality of Wet Weather Overflows: An
Excitation-Emission Matrix Parallel Factor Analysis Assessment, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 1157–1167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03727</ext-link>,
2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Ikemori, F., and Mochida, M.: Light Absorption and
Excitation-Emission Fluorescence of Urban Organic Aerosol Components and
Their Relationship to Chemical Structure, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
10859–10868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b02541</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Miyazaki, Y., Kawamura, K., Matsumoto, K., Coburn, S., Volkamer,
R., Iwamoto, Y., Kagami, S., Deng, Y., Ogawa, S., Ramasamy, S., Kato, S.,
Ida, A., Kajii, Y., and Mochida, M.: Characterization of Chromophoric
Water-Soluble Organic Matter in Urban, Forest, and Marine Aerosols by
HR-ToF-AMS Analysis and Excitation-Emission Matrix Spectroscopy, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 50, 10351–10360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01643" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b01643</ext-link>,
2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Ikemori, F., Nakamura, Y., Vodicka, P., Kawamura, K., and Mochida,
M.: Structural and Light-Absorption Characteristics of Complex
Water-Insoluble Organic Mixtures in Urban Submicrometer Aerosols, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 8293–8303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01630." ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b01630.</ext-link>,
2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Mu, Z., Song, W., Wang, Y., Yang, Z., Zhang, L., and Zhang, Y. L.:
Size Characterization of the Chromophores in Atmospheric
Particulate Matter From a Typical Coal City in China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos, 124, 10546–10563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031149" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019jd031149</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Sheng, G., Bi, X., Feng, Y., Bixian Mai, A., and Fu, J.: Emission
Factors for Carbonaceous Particles and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from
Residential Coal Combustion in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 1861–1687,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0493650" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0493650</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2529?><ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Tian, C., Feng, Y., Zhi, G., Li, J., and Zhang, G.: Measurements
of emission factors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC, EC, and BC for household stoves of coal
combustion in China, Atmos. Environ., 109, 190–196,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.023</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Ge, X., Chen, H., Xie, X., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Ye, Z., Bao, M.,
Zhang, Y., and Chen, M.: Seasonal light absorption properties of
water-soluble brown carbon in atmospheric fine particles in Nanjing, China,
Atmos. Environ., 187, 230–240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.002</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., He, K.-B., Zheng, M., Duan, F.-K., Du, Z.-Y., Ma, Y.-L., Tan, J.-H., Yang, F.-M., Liu, J.-M., Zhang, X.-L., Weber, R. J., Bergin, M. H., and Russell, A. G.: Mass absorption efficiency of elemental carbon and water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11497–11510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., He, K.-B., Du, Z.-Y., Engling, G., Liu, J.-M., Ma, Y.-L., Zheng,
M., and Weber, R. J.: The characteristics of brown carbon aerosol during
winter in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 127, 355–364,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.035</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Coble, P. G.: Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater
using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy, Mar. Chem., 51, 325–346,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(95)00062-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0304-4203(95)00062-3</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Coggon, M. M., Veres, P. R., Yuan, B., Koss, A., Warneke, C., Gilman, J. B.,
Lerner, B. M., Peischl, J., Aikin, K. C., Stockwell, C. E., Hatch, L. E.,
Ryerson, T. B., Roberts, J. M., Yokelson, R. J., and de Gouw, J. A.:
Emissions of nitrogen-containing organic compounds from the burning of
herbaceous and arboraceous biomass: Fuel composition dependence and the
variability of commonly used nitrile tracers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43,
9903–9912, https//doi.org/10.1002/2016gl070562, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cory, R. M. and Mcknight, D. M.: Fluorescence Spectroscopy Reveals
Ubiquitous Presence of Oxidized and Reduced Quinones in Dissolved Organic
Matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8142–8149,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0506962" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0506962</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cui, M., Chen, Y., Zheng, M., Li, J., Tang, J., Han, Y., Song, D., Yan, C.,
Zhang, F., Tian, C., and Zhang, G.: Emissions and characteristics of
particulate matter from rainforest burning in the Southeast Asia, Atmos.
Environ., 191, 194–204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.062</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dasari, S., Andersson, A., Bikkina, S., Holmstrand, H., Budhavant, K.,
Satheesh, S. K., Asmi, E., Kesti, J., Backman, J., and Salam, A.:
Photochemical degradation affects the light absorption of water-soluble
brown carbon in the South Asian outflow, Sci. Adv., 5,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aau8066</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Di Lorenzo, R. A., Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Guo, H., Xu, L., Ng,
N. L., Weber, R. J., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E., and Young, C. J.:
Molecular-Size-Separated Brown Carbon Absorption for Biomass-Burning Aerosol
at Multiple Field Sites, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 3128–3137,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b06160</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fan, X., Song, J., and Peng, P. A.: Comparison of isolation and
quantification methods to measure humic-like substances (HULIS) in
atmospheric particles, Atmos. Environ., 60, 366–374,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.063</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fan, X., Wei, S., Zhu, M., Song, J., and Peng, P.: Comprehensive characterization of humic-like substances in smoke <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted from the combustion of biomass materials and fossil fuels, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13321–13340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13321-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13321-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Feng, S., Zhang, L., Wang, S., Nadykto, A. B., Xu, Y., Shi, Q., Jiang, B.,
and Qian, W.: Characterization of dissolved organic nitrogen in wet
deposition from Lake Erhai basin by using ultrahigh resolution FT-ICR mass
spectrometry, Chemosphere, 156, 438–445,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.039</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607–8621, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fleming, L. T., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., Weltman, R., Edwards, R. D., Arora, N. K., Yadav, A., Meinardi, S., Blake, D. R., Pillarisetti, A., Smith, K. R., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Molecular composition of particulate matter emissions from dung and brushwood burning household cookstoves in Haryana, India, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2461–2480, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2461-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2461-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, P., Kawamura, K., Chen, J., Qin, M., Ren, L., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Barrie,
L. A., Tachibana, E., Ding, A., and Yamashita, Y.: Fluorescent water-soluble
organic aerosols in the High Arctic atmosphere, Sci. Rep., 5, 9845,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep09845</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gentner, D. R., Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Bahreini, R., Day, D. A., El
Haddad, I., Hayes, P. L., Pieber, S. M., Platt, S. M., de Gouw, J.,
Goldstein, A. H., Harley, R. A., Jimenez, J. L., Prevot, A. S., and
Robinson, A. L.: Review of Urban Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from
Gasoline and Diesel Motor Vehicle Emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
1074–1093, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b04509</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ghidotti, M., Fabbri, D., Masek, O., Mackay, C. L., Montalti, M., and
Hornung, A.: Source and Biological Response of Biochar Organic Compounds
Released into Water;  Relationships with Bio-Oil Composition and
Carbonization Degree, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 6580–6589,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00520" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b00520</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Graber, E. R. and Rudich, Y.: Atmospheric HULIS: How humic-like are they? A comprehensive and critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 729–753, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-729-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gu, Q. and Kenny, J. E.: Improvement of Inner Filter Effect Correction
Based on Determination of Effective Geometric Parameters Using a
Conventional Fluorimeter, Anal. Chem., 81, 420–426,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac801676j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac801676j</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hecobian, A., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Frank, N., Edgerton, E. S., and Weber, R. J.: Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol material and the light-absorption characteristics of aqueous extracts measured over the Southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5965–5977, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiang, B., Kuang, B. Y., Liang, Y., Zhang, J., Huang, X. H. H., Xu, C., Yu,
J. Z., and Shi, Q.: Molecular composition of urban organic aerosols on clear
and hazy days in Beijing: a comparative study using FT-ICR MS, Environ.
Chem., 13, 888–901, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/en15230" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/en15230</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W. and Thatcher, T. L.: Contribution of organic carbon to wood smoke particulate matter absorption of solar radiation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6067–6072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2530?><ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Koch, B. and Dittmar, T.: From mass to
structure: An aromaticity index for high-resolution mass data of natural
organic matter, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 20, 926–932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.2386</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kumar, N. K., Corbin, J. C., Bruns, E. A., Massabó, D., Slowik, J. G., Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Prati, P., Vlachou, A., Baltensperger, U., Gysel, M., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Production of particulate brown carbon during atmospheric aging of residential wood-burning emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17843–17861, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17843-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17843-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric
brown carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Smith, J. S., and Laskin, J.: Molecular Characterization of
Nitrogen-Containing Organic Compounds in Biomass Burning Aerosols Using
High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 3764–3771,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803456n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es803456n</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, H. J., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Excitation-emission spectra and fluorescence quantum yields for fresh and
aged biogenic secondary organic aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
5763–5770, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400644c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es400644c</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, C., He, Q., Schade, J., Passig, J., Zimmermann, R., Meidan, D., Laskin,
A., and Rudich, Y.: Dynamic changes in optical and chemical properties of
tar ball aerosols by atmospheric photochemical aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
19, 139–163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-139-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-139-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, M., Fan, X., Zhu, M., Zou, C., Song, J., Wei, S., Jia, W., and Peng, P.:
Abundances and light absorption properties of brown carbon emitted from
residential coal combustion in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 595–603,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05630" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b05630</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Rincon, A. G., Kalberer, M., and Yu, J. Z.: Elemental composition
of HULIS in the Pearl River Delta Region, China: results inferred from
positive and negative electrospray high resolution mass spectrometric data,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 7454–7462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es300285d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es300285d</ext-link>,
2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Yu, J. Z., Engling, G., and Kalberer, M.: Organosulfates in
humic-like substance fraction isolated from aerosols at seven locations in
East Asia: a study by ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 46, 13118–13127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es303570v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es303570v</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
and Laskin, A.: Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbon in Biomass
Burning Aerosol Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11815–11824,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Fleming, L. T., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and Laskin, A.:
Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Atmospheric Brown Carbon by High
Resolution Mass Spectrometry with Electrospray and Atmospheric Pressure
Photoionization, Anal. Chem., 90, 12493–12502,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02177" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02177</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber, R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Mo, Y., Ding, P., Li, J., Shen, C., and Zhang, G.: Dual carbon
isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and optical properties of WSOC and HULIS-C during
winter in Guangzhou, China, Sci. Total Environ., 633, 1571–1578,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.293" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.293</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Luciani, X., Mounier, S., Redon, R., and Bois, A.: A simple correction
method of inner filter effects affecting FEEM and its application to the
PARAFAC decomposition, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 96, 227–238,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.02.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.02.008</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lv, J., Zhang, S., Wang, S., Luo, L., Cao, D., and Christie, P.:
Molecular-Scale Investigation with ESI-FT-ICR-MS on Fractionation of
Dissolved Organic Matter Induced by Adsorption on Iron Oxyhydroxides,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 2328–2336,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04996" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b04996</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Matos, J. T. V., Freire, S. M. S. C., Duarte, R. M. B. O., and Duarte, A.
C.: Natural organic matter in urban aerosols: Comparison between water and
alkaline soluble components using excitation–emission matrix fluorescence
spectroscopy and multiway data analysis, Atmos. Environ., 102, 1–10,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.042</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mazzoleni, L. R., Ehrmann, B. M., Shen, X. H., Marshall, A. G., and Collett,
J. L.: Water-Soluble Atmospheric Organic Matter in Fog: Exact Masses and
Chemical Formula Identification by Ultrahigh-Resolution Fourier Transform
Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44,
3690–3697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es903409k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es903409k</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mo, Y., Li, J., Jiang, B., Su, T., Geng, X., Liu, J., Jiang, H., Shen, C.,
Ding, P., Zhong, G., Cheng, Z., Liao, Y., Tian, C., Chen, Y., and Zhang, G.:
Sources, compositions, and optical properties of humic-like substances in
Beijing during the 2014 APEC summit: Results from dual carbon isotope and
Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry analyses,
Environ. Pollut., 239, 322–331,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.041</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mo, Y. Z., Li, J., Liu, J. W., Zhong, G. C., Cheng, Z. N., Tian, C. G.,
Chen, Y. J., and Zhang, G.: The influence of solvent and pH on determination
of the light absorption properties of water-soluble brown carbon, Atmos.
Environ., 161, 90–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.037</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murphy, K. R., Butler, K. D., Spencer, R. G., Stedmon, C. A., Boehme, J. R.,
and Aiken, G. R.: Measurement of dissolved organic matter fluorescence in
aquatic environments: an interlaboratory comparison, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
44, 9405–9412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102362t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es102362t</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murphy, K. R., Stedmon, C. A., Graeber, D., and Bro, R.: Fluorescence
spectroscopy and multi-way techniques, PARAFAC, Anal. Methods, 5, 6557–6566,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41160e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c3ay41160e</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Park, S., Yu, G.-H., and Lee, S.: Optical absorption characteristics of
brown carbon aerosols during the KORUS-AQ campaign at an urban site, Atmos.
Res., 203, 16–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.12.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.12.002</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Park, S. S. and Yu, J.: Chemical and light absorption properties of
humic-like substances from biomass burning emissions under controlled
combustion experiments, Atmos. Environ., 136, 114–122,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.022</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2531?><ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Qin, J., Zhang, L., Zhou, X., Duan, J., Mu, S., Xiao, K., Hu, J., and Tan,
J.: Fluorescence fingerprinting properties for exploring water-soluble
organic compounds in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in an industrial city of northwest China,
Atmos. Environ., 184, 203–211,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.049</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Robinson, E. S., Tkacik, D. S., Ahern, A. T., Liu, S., Aiken, A.
C., Sullivan, R. C., Presto, A. A., Dubey, M. K., Yokelson, R. J., Donahue,
N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Brownness of organics in aerosols from biomass
burning linked to their black carbon content, Nat. Geosci., 7, 647–650,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2220" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2220</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Gelencser, A., Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E., Kiss, G.,
Hertkorn, N., Harir, M., Hong, Y., and Gebefugi, I.: Analysis of the
Unresolved Organic Fraction in Atmospheric Aerosols with
Ultrahigh-Resolution Mass Spectrometry and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Spectroscopy: Organosulfates As Photochemical Smog Constituents, Anal.
Chem., 82, 8017–8026, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101444r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac101444r</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sgroi, M., Roccaro, P., Korshin, G. V., and Vagliasindi, F. G. A.:
Monitoring the Behavior of Emerging Contaminants in Wastewater-Impacted
Rivers Based on the Use of Fluorescence Excitation Emission Matrixes (EEM),
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 4306–4316,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b05785</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shetty, N. J., Pandey, A., Baker, S., Hao, W. M., and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols: optical artifacts in traditional solvent-extraction-based methods, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8817–8830, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8817-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8817-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shimabuku, K. K., Kennedy, A. M., Mulhern, R. E., and Summers, R. S.:
Evaluating Activated Carbon Adsorption of Dissolved Organic Matter and
Micropollutants Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
2676–2684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04911" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b04911</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sleighter, R. L., Chen, H., Wozniak, A. S., Willoughby, A. S., Caricasole,
P., and Hatcher, P. G.: Establishing a measure of reproducibility of
ultrahigh-resolution mass spectra for complex mixtures of natural organic
matter, Anal. Chem., 84, 9184–9191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac3018026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac3018026</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smith, J. S., Laskin, A., and Laskin, J.: Molecular Characterization of
Biomass Burning Aerosols Using High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry, Anal.
Chem., 81, 1512–1521, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac8020664" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac8020664</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Song, J., Li, M., Jiang, B., Wei, S., Fan, X., and Peng, P.: Molecular
Characterization of Water-Soluble Humic like Substances in Smoke Particles
Emitted from Combustion of Biomass Materials and Coal Using
Ultrahigh-Resolution Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron
Resonance Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 2575–2585,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06126" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b06126</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Song, J., Li, M., Fan, X., Zou, C., Zhu, M., Jiang, B., Yu, Z., Jia, W.,
Liao, Y., and Peng, P. A.: Molecular characterization of water- and
methanol-soluble organic compounds emitted from residential coal combustion
using ultrahigh-resolution electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion
cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
53, 13607–13617, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04331" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b04331</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stubbins, A., Lapierre, J. F., Berggren, M., Prairie, Y. T., Dittmar, T.,
and del Giorgio, P. A.: What's in an EEM? Molecular signatures associated
with dissolved organic fluorescence in boreal Canada, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 48, 10598–10606, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502086e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es502086e</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, H., Biedermann, L., and Bond, T. C.: Color of brown carbon: A model for
ultraviolet and visible light absorption by organic carbon aerosol, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 34, L17813, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl029797" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl029797</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tao, S., Lu, X., Levac, N., Bateman, A. P., Nguyen, T. B., Bones, D. L.,
Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Yang, X.: Molecular
Characterization of Organosulfates in Organic Aerosols from Shanghai and Los
Angeles Urban Areas by Nanospray-Desorption Electrospray Ionization
High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 10993–11001,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5024674" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es5024674</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tian, J., Ni, H., Cao, J., Han, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Chen, L. W. A.,
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Wei, C., Sun, J., Zhang, T., and Huang, R.:
Characteristics of carbonaceous particles from residential coal combustion
and agricultural biomass burning in China, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 8, 521–527,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.006</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Hu, M., Lin, P., Guo, Q., Wu, Z., Li, M., Zeng, L., Song, Y.,
Zeng, L., Wu, Y., Guo, S., Huang, X., and He, L.: Molecular Characterization
of Nitrogen-Containing Organic Compounds in Humic-like Substances Emitted
from Straw Residue Burning, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5951–5961,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00248" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b00248</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wells, M. J. M., Mullins, G. A., Bell, K. Y., Da Silva, A. K., and
Navarrete, E. M.: Fluorescence and Quenching Assessment (EEM-PARAFAC) of de
Facto Potable Reuse in the Neuse River, North Carolina, United States,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 13592–13602,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03766" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b03766</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P. S., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Changes in Light Absorptivity
of Molecular Weight Separated Brown Carbon Due to Photolytic Aging, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 8414–8421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b01739</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wozniak, A. S., Bauer, J. E., Sleighter, R. L., Dickhut, R. M., and Hatcher, P. G.: Technical Note: Molecular characterization of aerosol-derived water soluble organic carbon using ultrahigh resolution electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5099–5111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5099-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-5099-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, G., Ram, K., Fu, P., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Stone, E. A.,
Pradhan, B. B., Dangol, P. M., Panday, A. K., Wan, X., Bai, Z., Kang, S.,
Zhang, Q., and Cong, Z.: Water-Soluble Brown Carbon in Atmospheric Aerosols
from Godavari (Nepal), a Regional Representative of South Asia, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 53, 3471–3479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00596" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b00596</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, M., Hays, M. D., and Holder, A. L.: Light-absorbing organic carbon from
prescribed and laboratory biomass burning and gasoline vehicle emissions,
Sci. Rep., 7, 7318, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, M., Chen, X., Holder, A. L., Hays, M. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg,
J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Jaoui, M., and Hannigan, M. P.: Light absorption
of organic carbon and its sources at a southeastern U.S. location in summer,
Environ. Pollut., 244, 38–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.125" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.125</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yan, C., Zheng, M., Sullivan, A. P., Bosch, C., Desyaterik, Y., Andersson,
A., Li, X., Guo, X., Zhou, T., Gustafsson, Ö., and Collett, J. L.:
Chemical characteristics and light-absorbing property of water-soluble
organic carbon in Beijing<?pagebreak page2532?>: Biomass burning contributions, Atmos. Environ.,
121, 4–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yan, G. and Kim, G.: Speciation and Sources of Brown Carbon in
Precipitation at Seoul, Korea: Insights from Excitation-Emission Matrix
Spectroscopy and Carbon Isotopic Analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
11580–11587, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02892" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02892</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yassine, M. M., Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E., Harir, M., and Schmitt-Kopplin, P.:
Identification of weak and strong organic acids in atmospheric aerosols by
capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry and ultra-high-resolution
Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem.,
84, 6586–6594, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac300798g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac300798g</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, H., Liang, H., Qu, F., Han, Z. S., Shao, S., Chang, H., and Li, G.:
Impact of dataset diversity on accuracy and sensitivity of parallel factor
analysis model of dissolved organic matter fluorescence excitation-emission
matrix, Sci. Rep., 5, 10207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10207" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep10207</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Lin, Y. H., Surratt, J. D., Zotter, P., Prevot, A. S. H., and
Weber, R. J.: Light soluble organic aerosol in Los Angeles and
Atlanta: A contrast in secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L21810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049385</ext-link>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Lin, Y. H., Surratt, J. D., and Weber, R. J.: Sources,
composition and absorption Angstrom exponent of light-absorbing organic
components in aerosol extracts from the Los Angeles Basin, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 3685–3693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es305047b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es305047b</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Yuan, Q., Huang, D., Kong, S., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Lu, C., Shi,
Z., Zhang, X., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Shao, L., Zhu, J., and Li, W.: Direct
Observations of Fine Primary Particles From Residential Coal Burning:
Insights Into Their Morphology, Composition, and Hygroscopicity, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos, 123, 12964–12979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd028988" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018jd028988</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Hallar, A. G., and Mazzoleni, L. R.: Atmospheric organic matter in clouds: exact masses and molecular formula identification using ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12343–12362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12343-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-12343-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, C. S., Cao, J. J., Huang, R. J., Shen, Z. X., Wang, Q. Y., and Zhang,
N. N.: Light absorption properties of brown carbon over the southeastern
Tibetan Plateau, Sci. Total Environ., 625, 246–251,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.183" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.183</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Molecular compositions and optical properties of dissolved brown carbon in biomass burning, coal combustion, and vehicle emission aerosols illuminated by excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry analysis</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Brown carbon (BrC) plays an essential impact on radiative forcing
due to its ability to absorb sunlight. In this study, the optical properties
and molecular characteristics of water-soluble and methanol-soluble organic
carbon (OC; MSOC) emitted from the simulated combustion of biomass and coal
fuels and vehicle emissions were investigated using ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis)
spectroscopy, excitation–emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy, and
Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS)
coupled with electrospray ionization (ESI). The results showed that these
smoke aerosol samples from biomass burning (BB) and coal combustion (CC) had
a higher mass absorption efficiency at 365&thinsp;nm (MAE<sub>365</sub>) than vehicle
emission samples. A stronger MAE<sub>365</sub> value was also found in MSOC than
water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC), indicating low polar compounds would
possess a higher light absorption capacity. Parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis
identified six types of fluorophores (P1–6) in WSOC including two
humic-like substances (HULIS-1) (P1 and P6), three protein-like substances
(PLOM) (P2, P3, and P5), and one undefined substance (P4). HULIS-1 was mainly from
aging vehicle exhaust particles; P2 was only abundant in BB aerosols; P3 was
ubiquitous in all tested aerosols; P4 was abundant in fossil burning
aerosols; and P5 was more intense in fresh vehicle exhaust particles. The
MSOC chromophores (six components; C1–6) exhibited consistent
characteristics with WSOC, suggesting the method could be used to indicate
the origins of chromophores. FT-ICR mass spectra showed that CHO and CHON
were the most abundant components of WSOC, but S-containing compounds
appeared in a higher abundance in CC aerosols and vehicle emissions than BB
aerosols, while considerably fewer S-containing compounds largely with CHO
and CHON were detected in MSOC. The unique formulas of different sources in the van Krevelen (VK) diagram presented different molecular distributions.
To be specific, BB aerosols with largely CHO and CHON had a medium H ∕ C and
low O ∕ C ratio,  while CC aerosols and vehicle emissions largely with
S-containing compounds had an opposite H ∕ C and O ∕ C ratio. Moreover, the
light absorption capacity of WSOC and MSOC was positively associated with
the unsaturation degree and molecular weight in the source aerosols. The
above results are potentially applicable to further studies on the EEM-based or
molecular-characteristic-based source apportionment of chromophores in
atmospheric aerosols.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andersson, C. A. and Bro, R.: The N-way Toolbox for MATLAB, Chemom.
Intell. Lab. Syst., 52, 1–4,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7439(00)00071-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7439(00)00071-x</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Andrade-Eiroa, Á., Canle, M., and Cerdá, V.: Environmental
Applications of Excitation-Emission Spectrofluorimetry: An In-Depth Review
I, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., 48, 1–49,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2012.692104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2012.692104</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bahram, M., Bro, R., Stedmon, C., and Afkhami, A.: Handling of Rayleigh and
Raman scatter for PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence data using interpolation,
J. Chemom., 20, 99–105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.978" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.978</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharya, R. and Osburn, C. L.: Multivariate Analyses of Phytoplankton
Pigment Fluorescence from a Freshwater River Network, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 51, 6683–6690, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05880</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Budisulistiorini, S. H., Riva, M., Williams, M., Chen, J., Itoh, M.,
Surratt, J. D., and Kuwata, M.: Light-Absorbing Brown Carbon Aerosol
Constituents from Combustion of Indonesian Peat and Biomass, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 51, 4415–4423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00397" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00397</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, H., Liao, Z. L., Gu, X. Y., Xie, J. Q., Li, H. Z., and Zhang, J.:
Anthropogenic Influences of Paved Runoff and Sanitary Sewage on the
Dissolved Organic Matter Quality of Wet Weather Overflows: An
Excitation-Emission Matrix Parallel Factor Analysis Assessment, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 1157–1167, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03727</a>,
2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q., Ikemori, F., and Mochida, M.: Light Absorption and
Excitation-Emission Fluorescence of Urban Organic Aerosol Components and
Their Relationship to Chemical Structure, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
10859–10868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02541</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q., Miyazaki, Y., Kawamura, K., Matsumoto, K., Coburn, S., Volkamer,
R., Iwamoto, Y., Kagami, S., Deng, Y., Ogawa, S., Ramasamy, S., Kato, S.,
Ida, A., Kajii, Y., and Mochida, M.: Characterization of Chromophoric
Water-Soluble Organic Matter in Urban, Forest, and Marine Aerosols by
HR-ToF-AMS Analysis and Excitation-Emission Matrix Spectroscopy, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 50, 10351–10360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01643" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01643</a>,
2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q., Ikemori, F., Nakamura, Y., Vodicka, P., Kawamura, K., and Mochida,
M.: Structural and Light-Absorption Characteristics of Complex
Water-Insoluble Organic Mixtures in Urban Submicrometer Aerosols, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 8293–8303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01630." target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01630.</a>,
2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q., Mu, Z., Song, W., Wang, Y., Yang, Z., Zhang, L., and Zhang, Y. L.:
Size Characterization of the Chromophores in Atmospheric
Particulate Matter From a Typical Coal City in China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos, 124, 10546–10563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031149" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031149</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Sheng, G., Bi, X., Feng, Y., Bixian Mai, A., and Fu, J.: Emission
Factors for Carbonaceous Particles and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from
Residential Coal Combustion in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 1861–1687,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0493650" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0493650</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Tian, C., Feng, Y., Zhi, G., Li, J., and Zhang, G.: Measurements
of emission factors of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, OC, EC, and BC for household stoves of coal
combustion in China, Atmos. Environ., 109, 190–196,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.023</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Ge, X., Chen, H., Xie, X., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Ye, Z., Bao, M.,
Zhang, Y., and Chen, M.: Seasonal light absorption properties of
water-soluble brown carbon in atmospheric fine particles in Nanjing, China,
Atmos. Environ., 187, 230–240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.002</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y., He, K.-B., Zheng, M., Duan, F.-K., Du, Z.-Y., Ma, Y.-L., Tan, J.-H., Yang, F.-M., Liu, J.-M., Zhang, X.-L., Weber, R. J., Bergin, M. H., and Russell, A. G.: Mass absorption efficiency of elemental carbon and water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11497–11510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y., He, K.-B., Du, Z.-Y., Engling, G., Liu, J.-M., Ma, Y.-L., Zheng,
M., and Weber, R. J.: The characteristics of brown carbon aerosol during
winter in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 127, 355–364,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.035</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Coble, P. G.: Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater
using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy, Mar. Chem., 51, 325–346,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(95)00062-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(95)00062-3</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Coggon, M. M., Veres, P. R., Yuan, B., Koss, A., Warneke, C., Gilman, J. B.,
Lerner, B. M., Peischl, J., Aikin, K. C., Stockwell, C. E., Hatch, L. E.,
Ryerson, T. B., Roberts, J. M., Yokelson, R. J., and de Gouw, J. A.:
Emissions of nitrogen-containing organic compounds from the burning of
herbaceous and arboraceous biomass: Fuel composition dependence and the
variability of commonly used nitrile tracers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43,
9903–9912, https//doi.org/10.1002/2016gl070562, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Cory, R. M. and Mcknight, D. M.: Fluorescence Spectroscopy Reveals
Ubiquitous Presence of Oxidized and Reduced Quinones in Dissolved Organic
Matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8142–8149,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0506962" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0506962</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Cui, M., Chen, Y., Zheng, M., Li, J., Tang, J., Han, Y., Song, D., Yan, C.,
Zhang, F., Tian, C., and Zhang, G.: Emissions and characteristics of
particulate matter from rainforest burning in the Southeast Asia, Atmos.
Environ., 191, 194–204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.062</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Dasari, S., Andersson, A., Bikkina, S., Holmstrand, H., Budhavant, K.,
Satheesh, S. K., Asmi, E., Kesti, J., Backman, J., and Salam, A.:
Photochemical degradation affects the light absorption of water-soluble
brown carbon in the South Asian outflow, Sci. Adv., 5,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8066</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Di Lorenzo, R. A., Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Guo, H., Xu, L., Ng,
N. L., Weber, R. J., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E., and Young, C. J.:
Molecular-Size-Separated Brown Carbon Absorption for Biomass-Burning Aerosol
at Multiple Field Sites, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 3128–3137,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06160</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, X., Song, J., and Peng, P. A.: Comparison of isolation and
quantification methods to measure humic-like substances (HULIS) in
atmospheric particles, Atmos. Environ., 60, 366–374,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.063</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, X., Wei, S., Zhu, M., Song, J., and Peng, P.: Comprehensive characterization of humic-like substances in smoke PM<sub>2.5</sub> emitted from the combustion of biomass materials and fossil fuels, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13321–13340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13321-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13321-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, S., Zhang, L., Wang, S., Nadykto, A. B., Xu, Y., Shi, Q., Jiang, B.,
and Qian, W.: Characterization of dissolved organic nitrogen in wet
deposition from Lake Erhai basin by using ultrahigh resolution FT-ICR mass
spectrometry, Chemosphere, 156, 438–445,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.039</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607–8621, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Fleming, L. T., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., Weltman, R., Edwards, R. D., Arora, N. K., Yadav, A., Meinardi, S., Blake, D. R., Pillarisetti, A., Smith, K. R., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Molecular composition of particulate matter emissions from dung and brushwood burning household cookstoves in Haryana, India, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2461–2480, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2461-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2461-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, P., Kawamura, K., Chen, J., Qin, M., Ren, L., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Barrie,
L. A., Tachibana, E., Ding, A., and Yamashita, Y.: Fluorescent water-soluble
organic aerosols in the High Arctic atmosphere, Sci. Rep., 5, 9845,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09845</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Gentner, D. R., Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Bahreini, R., Day, D. A., El
Haddad, I., Hayes, P. L., Pieber, S. M., Platt, S. M., de Gouw, J.,
Goldstein, A. H., Harley, R. A., Jimenez, J. L., Prevot, A. S., and
Robinson, A. L.: Review of Urban Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from
Gasoline and Diesel Motor Vehicle Emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
1074–1093, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Ghidotti, M., Fabbri, D., Masek, O., Mackay, C. L., Montalti, M., and
Hornung, A.: Source and Biological Response of Biochar Organic Compounds
Released into Water;  Relationships with Bio-Oil Composition and
Carbonization Degree, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 6580–6589,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00520" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00520</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Graber, E. R. and Rudich, Y.: Atmospheric HULIS: How humic-like are they? A comprehensive and critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 729–753, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Gu, Q. and Kenny, J. E.: Improvement of Inner Filter Effect Correction
Based on Determination of Effective Geometric Parameters Using a
Conventional Fluorimeter, Anal. Chem., 81, 420–426,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac801676j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac801676j</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hecobian, A., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Frank, N., Edgerton, E. S., and Weber, R. J.: Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol material and the light-absorption characteristics of aqueous extracts measured over the Southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5965–5977, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, B., Kuang, B. Y., Liang, Y., Zhang, J., Huang, X. H. H., Xu, C., Yu,
J. Z., and Shi, Q.: Molecular composition of urban organic aerosols on clear
and hazy days in Beijing: a comparative study using FT-ICR MS, Environ.
Chem., 13, 888–901, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/en15230" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/en15230</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchstetter, T. W. and Thatcher, T. L.: Contribution of organic carbon to wood smoke particulate matter absorption of solar radiation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6067–6072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Koch, B. and Dittmar, T.: From mass to
structure: An aromaticity index for high-resolution mass data of natural
organic matter, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 20, 926–932, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2386" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2386</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, N. K., Corbin, J. C., Bruns, E. A., Massabó, D., Slowik, J. G., Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Prati, P., Vlachou, A., Baltensperger, U., Gysel, M., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Production of particulate brown carbon during atmospheric aging of residential wood-burning emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17843–17861, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17843-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17843-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric
brown carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Smith, J. S., and Laskin, J.: Molecular Characterization of
Nitrogen-Containing Organic Compounds in Biomass Burning Aerosols Using
High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 3764–3771,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803456n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es803456n</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, H. J., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Excitation-emission spectra and fluorescence quantum yields for fresh and
aged biogenic secondary organic aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
5763–5770, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400644c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es400644c</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., He, Q., Schade, J., Passig, J., Zimmermann, R., Meidan, D., Laskin,
A., and Rudich, Y.: Dynamic changes in optical and chemical properties of
tar ball aerosols by atmospheric photochemical aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
19, 139–163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-139-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-139-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Li, M., Fan, X., Zhu, M., Zou, C., Song, J., Wei, S., Jia, W., and Peng, P.:
Abundances and light absorption properties of brown carbon emitted from
residential coal combustion in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 595–603,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05630" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05630</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Rincon, A. G., Kalberer, M., and Yu, J. Z.: Elemental composition
of HULIS in the Pearl River Delta Region, China: results inferred from
positive and negative electrospray high resolution mass spectrometric data,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 7454–7462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es300285d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es300285d</a>,
2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Yu, J. Z., Engling, G., and Kalberer, M.: Organosulfates in
humic-like substance fraction isolated from aerosols at seven locations in
East Asia: a study by ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 46, 13118–13127, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es303570v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es303570v</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
and Laskin, A.: Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbon in Biomass
Burning Aerosol Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11815–11824,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Fleming, L. T., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and Laskin, A.:
Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Atmospheric Brown Carbon by High
Resolution Mass Spectrometry with Electrospray and Atmospheric Pressure
Photoionization, Anal. Chem., 90, 12493–12502,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02177" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02177</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber, R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Mo, Y., Ding, P., Li, J., Shen, C., and Zhang, G.: Dual carbon
isotopes (<sup>14</sup>C and <sup>13</sup>C) and optical properties of WSOC and HULIS-C during
winter in Guangzhou, China, Sci. Total Environ., 633, 1571–1578,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.293" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.293</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Luciani, X., Mounier, S., Redon, R., and Bois, A.: A simple correction
method of inner filter effects affecting FEEM and its application to the
PARAFAC decomposition, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 96, 227–238,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.02.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.02.008</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Lv, J., Zhang, S., Wang, S., Luo, L., Cao, D., and Christie, P.:
Molecular-Scale Investigation with ESI-FT-ICR-MS on Fractionation of
Dissolved Organic Matter Induced by Adsorption on Iron Oxyhydroxides,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 2328–2336,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04996" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04996</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Matos, J. T. V., Freire, S. M. S. C., Duarte, R. M. B. O., and Duarte, A.
C.: Natural organic matter in urban aerosols: Comparison between water and
alkaline soluble components using excitation–emission matrix fluorescence
spectroscopy and multiway data analysis, Atmos. Environ., 102, 1–10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.042</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Mazzoleni, L. R., Ehrmann, B. M., Shen, X. H., Marshall, A. G., and Collett,
J. L.: Water-Soluble Atmospheric Organic Matter in Fog: Exact Masses and
Chemical Formula Identification by Ultrahigh-Resolution Fourier Transform
Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44,
3690–3697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es903409k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es903409k</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Mo, Y., Li, J., Jiang, B., Su, T., Geng, X., Liu, J., Jiang, H., Shen, C.,
Ding, P., Zhong, G., Cheng, Z., Liao, Y., Tian, C., Chen, Y., and Zhang, G.:
Sources, compositions, and optical properties of humic-like substances in
Beijing during the 2014 APEC summit: Results from dual carbon isotope and
Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry analyses,
Environ. Pollut., 239, 322–331,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.041</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Mo, Y. Z., Li, J., Liu, J. W., Zhong, G. C., Cheng, Z. N., Tian, C. G.,
Chen, Y. J., and Zhang, G.: The influence of solvent and pH on determination
of the light absorption properties of water-soluble brown carbon, Atmos.
Environ., 161, 90–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.037</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, K. R., Butler, K. D., Spencer, R. G., Stedmon, C. A., Boehme, J. R.,
and Aiken, G. R.: Measurement of dissolved organic matter fluorescence in
aquatic environments: an interlaboratory comparison, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
44, 9405–9412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102362t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es102362t</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, K. R., Stedmon, C. A., Graeber, D., and Bro, R.: Fluorescence
spectroscopy and multi-way techniques, PARAFAC, Anal. Methods, 5, 6557–6566,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41160e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41160e</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Park, S., Yu, G.-H., and Lee, S.: Optical absorption characteristics of
brown carbon aerosols during the KORUS-AQ campaign at an urban site, Atmos.
Res., 203, 16–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.12.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.12.002</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Park, S. S. and Yu, J.: Chemical and light absorption properties of
humic-like substances from biomass burning emissions under controlled
combustion experiments, Atmos. Environ., 136, 114–122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.022</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, J., Zhang, L., Zhou, X., Duan, J., Mu, S., Xiao, K., Hu, J., and Tan,
J.: Fluorescence fingerprinting properties for exploring water-soluble
organic compounds in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in an industrial city of northwest China,
Atmos. Environ., 184, 203–211,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.049</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Saleh, R., Robinson, E. S., Tkacik, D. S., Ahern, A. T., Liu, S., Aiken, A.
C., Sullivan, R. C., Presto, A. A., Dubey, M. K., Yokelson, R. J., Donahue,
N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Brownness of organics in aerosols from biomass
burning linked to their black carbon content, Nat. Geosci., 7, 647–650,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2220" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2220</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Gelencser, A., Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E., Kiss, G.,
Hertkorn, N., Harir, M., Hong, Y., and Gebefugi, I.: Analysis of the
Unresolved Organic Fraction in Atmospheric Aerosols with
Ultrahigh-Resolution Mass Spectrometry and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Spectroscopy: Organosulfates As Photochemical Smog Constituents, Anal.
Chem., 82, 8017–8026, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101444r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101444r</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Sgroi, M., Roccaro, P., Korshin, G. V., and Vagliasindi, F. G. A.:
Monitoring the Behavior of Emerging Contaminants in Wastewater-Impacted
Rivers Based on the Use of Fluorescence Excitation Emission Matrixes (EEM),
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 4306–4316,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05785" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05785</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Shetty, N. J., Pandey, A., Baker, S., Hao, W. M., and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols: optical artifacts in traditional solvent-extraction-based methods, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8817–8830, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8817-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8817-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Shimabuku, K. K., Kennedy, A. M., Mulhern, R. E., and Summers, R. S.:
Evaluating Activated Carbon Adsorption of Dissolved Organic Matter and
Micropollutants Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
2676–2684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04911" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04911</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Sleighter, R. L., Chen, H., Wozniak, A. S., Willoughby, A. S., Caricasole,
P., and Hatcher, P. G.: Establishing a measure of reproducibility of
ultrahigh-resolution mass spectra for complex mixtures of natural organic
matter, Anal. Chem., 84, 9184–9191, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac3018026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac3018026</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. S., Laskin, A., and Laskin, J.: Molecular Characterization of
Biomass Burning Aerosols Using High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry, Anal.
Chem., 81, 1512–1521, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac8020664" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac8020664</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Song, J., Li, M., Jiang, B., Wei, S., Fan, X., and Peng, P.: Molecular
Characterization of Water-Soluble Humic like Substances in Smoke Particles
Emitted from Combustion of Biomass Materials and Coal Using
Ultrahigh-Resolution Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron
Resonance Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 2575–2585,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06126" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06126</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Song, J., Li, M., Fan, X., Zou, C., Zhu, M., Jiang, B., Yu, Z., Jia, W.,
Liao, Y., and Peng, P. A.: Molecular characterization of water- and
methanol-soluble organic compounds emitted from residential coal combustion
using ultrahigh-resolution electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion
cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
53, 13607–13617, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04331" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04331</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Stubbins, A., Lapierre, J. F., Berggren, M., Prairie, Y. T., Dittmar, T.,
and del Giorgio, P. A.: What's in an EEM? Molecular signatures associated
with dissolved organic fluorescence in boreal Canada, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 48, 10598–10606, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502086e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es502086e</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, H., Biedermann, L., and Bond, T. C.: Color of brown carbon: A model for
ultraviolet and visible light absorption by organic carbon aerosol, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 34, L17813, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl029797" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl029797</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, S., Lu, X., Levac, N., Bateman, A. P., Nguyen, T. B., Bones, D. L.,
Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Yang, X.: Molecular
Characterization of Organosulfates in Organic Aerosols from Shanghai and Los
Angeles Urban Areas by Nanospray-Desorption Electrospray Ionization
High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 10993–11001,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5024674" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es5024674</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Tian, J., Ni, H., Cao, J., Han, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Chen, L. W. A.,
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Wei, C., Sun, J., Zhang, T., and Huang, R.:
Characteristics of carbonaceous particles from residential coal combustion
and agricultural biomass burning in China, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 8, 521–527,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.006</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Hu, M., Lin, P., Guo, Q., Wu, Z., Li, M., Zeng, L., Song, Y.,
Zeng, L., Wu, Y., Guo, S., Huang, X., and He, L.: Molecular Characterization
of Nitrogen-Containing Organic Compounds in Humic-like Substances Emitted
from Straw Residue Burning, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5951–5961,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00248" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00248</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Wells, M. J. M., Mullins, G. A., Bell, K. Y., Da Silva, A. K., and
Navarrete, E. M.: Fluorescence and Quenching Assessment (EEM-PARAFAC) of de
Facto Potable Reuse in the Neuse River, North Carolina, United States,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 13592–13602,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03766" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03766</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Wong, J. P. S., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Changes in Light Absorptivity
of Molecular Weight Separated Brown Carbon Due to Photolytic Aging, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 8414–8421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01739" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01739</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Wozniak, A. S., Bauer, J. E., Sleighter, R. L., Dickhut, R. M., and Hatcher, P. G.: Technical Note: Molecular characterization of aerosol-derived water soluble organic carbon using ultrahigh resolution electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5099–5111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5099-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5099-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, G., Ram, K., Fu, P., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Stone, E. A.,
Pradhan, B. B., Dangol, P. M., Panday, A. K., Wan, X., Bai, Z., Kang, S.,
Zhang, Q., and Cong, Z.: Water-Soluble Brown Carbon in Atmospheric Aerosols
from Godavari (Nepal), a Regional Representative of South Asia, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 53, 3471–3479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00596" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00596</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, M., Hays, M. D., and Holder, A. L.: Light-absorbing organic carbon from
prescribed and laboratory biomass burning and gasoline vehicle emissions,
Sci. Rep., 7, 7318, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, M., Chen, X., Holder, A. L., Hays, M. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg,
J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Jaoui, M., and Hannigan, M. P.: Light absorption
of organic carbon and its sources at a southeastern U.S. location in summer,
Environ. Pollut., 244, 38–46, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.125" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.125</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, C., Zheng, M., Sullivan, A. P., Bosch, C., Desyaterik, Y., Andersson,
A., Li, X., Guo, X., Zhou, T., Gustafsson, Ö., and Collett, J. L.:
Chemical characteristics and light-absorbing property of water-soluble
organic carbon in Beijing: Biomass burning contributions, Atmos. Environ.,
121, 4–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.005</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, G. and Kim, G.: Speciation and Sources of Brown Carbon in
Precipitation at Seoul, Korea: Insights from Excitation-Emission Matrix
Spectroscopy and Carbon Isotopic Analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
11580–11587, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02892" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02892</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Yassine, M. M., Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E., Harir, M., and Schmitt-Kopplin, P.:
Identification of weak and strong organic acids in atmospheric aerosols by
capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry and ultra-high-resolution
Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem.,
84, 6586–6594, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac300798g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac300798g</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, H., Liang, H., Qu, F., Han, Z. S., Shao, S., Chang, H., and Li, G.:
Impact of dataset diversity on accuracy and sensitivity of parallel factor
analysis model of dissolved organic matter fluorescence excitation-emission
matrix, Sci. Rep., 5, 10207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10207" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10207</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Lin, Y. H., Surratt, J. D., Zotter, P., Prevot, A. S. H., and
Weber, R. J.: Light soluble organic aerosol in Los Angeles and
Atlanta: A contrast in secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L21810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049385</a>, 2011.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Lin, Y. H., Surratt, J. D., and Weber, R. J.: Sources,
composition and absorption Angstrom exponent of light-absorbing organic
components in aerosol extracts from the Los Angeles Basin, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 3685–3693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es305047b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es305047b</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Yuan, Q., Huang, D., Kong, S., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Lu, C., Shi,
Z., Zhang, X., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Shao, L., Zhu, J., and Li, W.: Direct
Observations of Fine Primary Particles From Residential Coal Burning:
Insights Into Their Morphology, Composition, and Hygroscopicity, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos, 123, 12964–12979, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd028988" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd028988</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Hallar, A. G., and Mazzoleni, L. R.: Atmospheric organic matter in clouds: exact masses and molecular formula identification using ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12343–12362, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12343-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12343-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, C. S., Cao, J. J., Huang, R. J., Shen, Z. X., Wang, Q. Y., and Zhang,
N. N.: Light absorption properties of brown carbon over the southeastern
Tibetan Plateau, Sci. Total Environ., 625, 246–251,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.183" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.183</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
