<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-20-14649-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Hectometric-scale simulations of a Mediterranean heavy-<?xmltex \hack{\break}?>precipitation event during the Hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX) first Special<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Observation Period (SOP1)</article-title><alt-title>LES of a Mediterranean heavy-precipitation event</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{LES of a Mediterranean heavy-precipitation event}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{O. Nuissier et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nuissier</surname><given-names>Olivier</given-names></name>
          <email>olivier.nuissier@meteo.fr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Duffourg</surname><given-names>Fanny</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Martinet</surname><given-names>Maxime</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ducrocq</surname><given-names>Véronique</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1574-9287</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lac</surname><given-names>Christine</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>CNRM (Météo-France &amp; CNRS), 42 avenue G. Coriolis 31057 Toulouse, CÉDEX, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>CSG (CNES &amp; Agence spatiale europeenne), SDO/AM/MTO, 97387 Kourou,
CEDEX, Guyane, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Olivier Nuissier (olivier.nuissier@meteo.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>1</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>23</issue>
      <fpage>14649</fpage><lpage>14667</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>14</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>13</day><month>November</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>August</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e127">Offshore convection occurred over the Mediterranean sea on 26 October 2012 and was well documented during the first Special Observation Period (SOP1) of the Hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX). This paper analyses the triggering and organizing factors involved in this convection case study, and examines how they are simulated and represented at hectometric resolutions. For that purpose, a large-eddy simulation (LES) of this real case study is carried out with a 150 m horizontal resolution over a large domain encompassing the convective systems and the low-level flow feeding convection over the sea. This LES is then compared to a reference simulation performed with a 450 m grid spacing in the heart of the so-called “grey zone” of turbulence modelling.</p>
    <p id="d1e130">An increase in horizontal resolution from 450  down to 150 m is unable, for this case study, to reduce significantly deficiencies of the simulation; this is more related to an issue of initial and lateral boundary conditions. Indeed, some of the triggering factors, such as a converging low-level flow driven by a surface low-pressure system, are simulated quite similarly for both simulations. However, differences for other mechanisms still exist since greater surface precipitation amounts are simulated at 450 m. It is found that the entrainment process, characterized by small eddies at the cloud edges, is strongly underestimated at 450 m horizontal resolution, missing the mixing with the environmental air. Therefore, too rapid a development of deep convection is simulated at this horizontal resolution, associated with fast-track microphysical processes and enhanced dynamics. By contrast, at 150 m horizontal resolution, the updraught cores are mainly resolved, as are the subsiding shell, while subgrid eddies, produced by dynamical processes, are localized at the cloud interior edges, better representing the entrainment process.</p>
    <p id="d1e133">Furthermore, this first LES of a real Mediterranean precipitating case study highlights a convective organization with very fine-scale features within the converging low-level flow, features that are definitively out of range of models with kilometric horizontal resolutions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e145">Regularly during fall, heavy-precipitation events (HPEs) occur over the northwestern Mediterranean basin and more particularly over the mountainous coastal regions of France, Spain, and Italy. In most cases, large amounts of precipitation are recorded in less than 1 d (typically more than 200 mm in less than 24 h and sometimes in only a few hours) when a mesoscale convective system (MCS) develops and stays over the same area for several hours <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="post">among others</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14650?><p id="d1e153">Several past case studies, especially within the framework of the Hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX) Special Observation Period (SOP1), have extensively investigated the mechanisms and physical processes associated with such high-impact events, based on numerical experiments with kilometric horizontal resolutions and dedicated observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.2"/>. Over the Western Mediterranean region, HPEs evolve often within a favourable synoptic pattern, including an upper-level trough centred over the Iberian Peninsula and/or high values of geopotential anchored over central Europe, driving a persistent low-level moist and conditionally unstable marine flow directed towards the coastal mountainous regions. Due to regional and local effects, the low-level flow is then deflected by neighbouring mountain ranges (Pyrénées, Massif Central, and the Alps) or islands such Corsica and Sardinia. In order to trigger deep convection, a lifting mechanism is needed to focus and finally release the conditional convective instability at the same location. Orographic lifting of the conditionally unstable low-level marine flow impinging the foothills neighbouring the Western Mediterranean is a well-studied mechanism for renewing convection triggering at the same location <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.3"/>. Lifting can also be due to local convergence in the low-level circulation induced by the orography of the region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.4"/> or lee cyclogenesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.5"/>. A low-level cold pool, possibly forming under the MCS, can also lift the low-level flow at its leading edge <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.6"/> and/or modify the low-level circulation locally and enhance convergence areas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e175">While these previous studies have shown that a horizontal resolution of about 1 km is able to simulate many of the observed features of Mediterranean HPEs, as well as their associated key physical mechanisms, they have difficulties representing the time at which convection is triggered and how it is organized. The increase in horizontal resolution to sub-kilometric grid spacings could be a way for improvement. Indeed,  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.8"/> have shown, for an idealized convective case, that an increase in horizontal resolution of 500 m simulates stronger updraughts within convective cells associated with a greater cloudy coverage. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.9"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.10"/> carried out numerical modelling HPE case studies over Italy with grid spacings ranging from 5 km to 200 m. Similar to idealized studies, they found that smaller convective cells with a stronger intensity are simulated with a horizontal resolution finer than 500 m. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.11"/> found that, when the horizontal grid spacing is reduced to 500 m, precipitation is more widespread, maximum values are lower, and individual convective cells are smaller. These previous studies concluded that surface precipitation amounts are enhanced and convective structures are better represented at a sub-kilometric scale.</p>
      <p id="d1e190">Nevertheless, the increase in horizontal resolution may pose problems especially for the turbulence parameterization within the so-called “grey zone” (GZ), typically in the range of horizontal resolutions of about a few hundreds of metres and also depending on the model's effective resolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.12"/>. Indeed, there are still uncertainties about how turbulence should be modelled at these resolutions. Past studies have investigated the impact of a one-dimensional (1D) versus a three-dimensional (3D) representation of the turbulence at sub-kilometric horizontal resolution. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.13"/> showed that a 3D turbulence leads to stronger mixing and greater cloud cover. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.14"/> carried out simulations using 1D turbulence, which produced too many small cloud systems and rainy cells with a shorter lifespan. Additionally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.15"/> compared kilometric deep-convection simulations, with up to 500 m resolution, to a large-eddy simulation (LES) and showed that subgrid turbulent kinetic energy at these resolutions was underestimated with the eddy-diffusivity turbulence scheme, due to an underestimation of thermal turbulence production, while resolved vertical velocities tend to be overestimated. Based on simulations carried out with 500 m grid spacings, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.16"/> found that, for a specific case study of HyMeX SOP1 (IOP16a), it is not only cloud organization but also the simulated environment and processes governing convection that are strongly sensitive to the formulation of the mixing length. Indeed, when turbulent mixing is weak (i.e. weak subgrid turbulent kinetic energy), the resolved winds are increased, leading to greater low-level moisture advection, higher hydrometeor contents, marked low-level cold pools, and therefore more intense simulated convective systems.</p>
      <p id="d1e209">This strong sensitivity obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.17"/> motivates the adoption of an LES-like approach, enabling a more suitable representation of turbulence within and at the edge of convective clouds and also within the atmospheric boundary layer. In an LES framework, eddies that contain most of the kinetic energy are resolved, whereas smaller eddies, which carry less than 20 % of the total kinetic energy, are represented by subgrid processes. Although several studies have demonstrated the need to use grid spacing of about 100 m to represent the convective flow correctly <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.18"><named-content content-type="post">among others</named-content></xref>, most of these works were carried out using an idealized framework and/or using a small domain. To the authors's knowledge no LES numerical simulation of a real case study of Mediterranean HPE over a large domain has previously been performed. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and analyse the impact of increasing horizontal resolution for LES in a numerical simulation of Mediterranean HPE, using a true topography in addition to realistic initial and forcing conditions. The present study goes further analysing how the physical mechanisms and convective organization are represented from sub-kilometric horizontal resolutions down to LES. For that purpose, a large domain encompassing the convective systems as well as the low-level flow feeding convection over the sea is considered. The paper focuses on the same offshore convection case study described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.19"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.20"/> (IOP16a), which took place on 26 October 2012 during the SOP1 of the HyMeX field programme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.21"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14651?><p id="d1e229">This article is organized as follows. A quick review of the case study and the mechanisms involved are provided in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>. The numerical model and the simulation setup are presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>. Both simulations with hectometric horizontal resolutions and LES, respectively, are compared in terms of rainfall field analysis and convection organization in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>. The physical processes at cloud scale leading to very deep convection and convection organization are assessed  in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>. Finally, the study is summarized and conclusions are given in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/>, where perspectives for future work are also suggested.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e244">ARPEGE analysis for IOP16a in terms of 500 hPa geopotential height (solid line, every 50 dam) and mean sea level pressure (dashed line, hPa) and Meteosat Second Generation infrared brightness temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) (channel 9, 10.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) (coloured areas) valid at 06:00 UTC on 26 October 2012.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>The IOP16a case study</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Meteorological conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e285">This section presents the HPE observed on 26 October 2012 and well documented during the HyMeX SOP1. During this event, a large part of the northwestern Mediterranean was affected by intense precipitation which locally led to flash flooding.</p>
      <p id="d1e288">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> shows the synoptic-scale situation, valid at 06:00 UTC on 26 October 2012. The synoptic situation was characterized by a large deep upper-level low centred over Spain. A short-wave trough along with an associated potential vorticity anomaly (not shown) circulated ahead of the main system (i.e. offshore intense convective systems), passing over southeastern Spain, France, and then Italy. Moreover, a large low was also anchored over Spain as seen with the mean sea level pressure (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e297">Observed radar reflectivity (colour scale, dBZ) superimposed onto AROME analysis for IOP16a in terms of adiabatic wet-bulb potential temperature (coloured areas) and horizontal winds greater than 20 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (arrows) at 925 hPa valid at <bold>(a)</bold> 06:00 UTC, <bold>(b)</bold> 09:00 UTC, and <bold>(c)</bold> 12:00 UTC on 26 October 2012.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page14652?><p id="d1e328"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>At low levels, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows that deep convection was embedded within a very moist flow all along the system life cycle. A surface low pressure formed and strengthened downstream of the Iberian mountainous regions, between Spain and the Balearic Islands. It was strongly associated with the eastward propagation of the upper-level trough.</p>
      <p id="d1e334">Such favourable meteorological conditions described above led to the generation of several convective systems over the Mediterranean Sea. The first convective cells appeared just east of the Spanish coast around 06:00 UTC on 26 October. Convection started to organize while moving northeastwards and forming an intense south–north-oriented line (marked CS1) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b). It appeared that, in addition to offshore convection, the meteorological situation was also favourable for orographic forcing over the southern slopes of the Massif Central throughout the day on 26 October 2012. The southernmost cells behind CS1 also developed and organized into a second mesoscale convective system (marked CS2), which headed east–northeastwards towards the southeastern coastal regions of France. In the afternoon of 26 October 2012, CS2 crossed the region with surface rainfall amounts of about 150 mm in 24h causing two casualties.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Triggering mechanisms</title>
      <p id="d1e347">An exhaustive evaluation of Meso-NH simulations for the convective systems involved in IOP16a can be found in both <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.22"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.23"/> at 2.5 km and 500 m horizontal resolution, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e356">The numerous dedicated airborne and ground-based observations during the HyMeX SOP1 (suites of water vapour lidars, wind profilers, radiosoundings, and boundary-layer drifting balloons, among others) over the sea and along the coast of the northwestern Mediterranean offered a unique framework for validating the convective systems simulated over the sea by kilometric-scale numerical models initialized and driven by kilometric resolution analyses. Indeed, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.24"/> showed that these convective systems during IOP16a were fed during their evolution over the sea by moist and conditionally unstable air masses. A southwest to southeasterly converging low-level flow over the sea is the main triggering mechanism acting to continually initiate and maintain the renewal of convective cells, contributing to the back-building systems CS1 and CS2. Lifting is also partly due to evaporative low-level cooling. In addition it appears that this low-level cooling also controls the organization into a mesoscale convective system.</p>
      <p id="d1e362"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.25"/> found that the mechanisms mentioned above, as well as the dynamics of the convective systems, are sensitive to the mixing length formulation used in turbulence parameterization, at a horizontal resolution of 500 m. These elements motivate an increase in the horizontal resolution up to LES scale in this present study to assess how the physical mechanisms involved are represented.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Description on the numerical experiments</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>The Meso-NH model</title>
      <p id="d1e384">The French non-hydrostatic mesoscale numerical model Meso-NH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.26"/> was used for the simulation of the IOP16a case study. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.27"/>  vertical coordinate is used with 140 vertical levels. The vertical grid spacing is stretched with altitude, from 10 m close to the surface to 250 m aloft. The top of the domain is at 20 km altitude, and a Rayleigh damping is progressively applied above 15 km altitude to the perturbations of the wind components and the thermodynamical variables with respect to their large-scale values, in order to prevent spurious reflections from the upper boundary.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e395">Computational domains used for the outer/coarser domain (900 m, dashed rectangle) and for the inner/finer domain (450  or 150 m, thick solid rectangle), respectively (see text for more explanation). The model orography (m) is shown in shading.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e406">Six-hour accumulated simulated and observed surface precipitation from <bold>(a)</bold> the LR450 experiment, <bold>(b)</bold> the LR150 experiment, and <bold>(c)</bold> radar estimates between 06:00 and 12:00 UTC on October 2012. The small circles in the panels represent the rain gauge observations, whereas the largest ones highlight the surface precipitation associated with CS2.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e425">The prognostic variables are the three Cartesian components of velocity: the dry potential temperature, the different water mixing ratios, and the turbulent kinetic energy. Pressure perturbations are determined by solving the elliptic equation obtained by combining air mass continuity and momentum conservation equations. The transport scheme for momentum variables is the weighted essentially nonoscillatory
(WENO) scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.28"/> of the fifth order combined with the fourth-order Runge–Kutta time-splitting method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.29"/>, while the other 20 variables are transported with the piecewise parabolic method (PPM) scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.30"/>. A bulk one-moment mixed microphysical scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.31"/> governs the equations of the six water
species: water vapour, cloud water, rainwater, primary ice, snow aggregates, and graupel. The turbulence parametrization is based on a 1.5-order closure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.32"/> and the calculation of the turbulent flow is performed through a three-dimensional (3D) scheme<?pagebreak page14653?> for a horizontal resolution below kilometric grid spacings. For a horizontal resolution of about a few hundred metres and coarser grids, the mixing length follows the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.33"/>, whereas for LES resolution, the mixing length formulation follows the one proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.34"/>, which is directly proportional to the grid volume. The numerical setup used in this study also used other parametrization schemes including the Rapid Radiation Transfer Model parametrization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.35"/>, the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.36"/> eddy-diffusivity mass flux scheme for shallow convection, and the surface model SURFace EXternalisé (SURFEX) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.37"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e461"><bold>(a)</bold> Time series of the hourly surface precipitation (mm) for LR450 and LR150 experiment, averaged over the whole subdomain seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> (solid lines) and averaged over the area where surface precipitation exceeds 0.1 mm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (dashed lines). <bold>(b)</bold> Time series of spatial coverage (%) of the hourly surface precipitation exceeding the threshold of 0.1 mm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the same subdomain.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=142.26378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e503">Simulated radar reflectivities (dBZ) at 850 hPa and horizontal winds (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 950 hPa from <bold>(a)</bold> LR450 and <bold>(b)</bold> LR150 at 09:00 UTC on 26 October 2012, respectively. Panels <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold> are the same except for 12:00 UTC. The symbol L marks the location of the surface low-pressure system. Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold> (f)</bold> represent the observed radar reflectivities at 09:00 and 12:00 UTC, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Simulation design</title>
      <p id="d1e551">In this present study an LES of the IOP16a case study is carried out with the Meso-NH model. As in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.38"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.39"/>, the initial and lateral boundary conditions of the simulations
are provided by the AROME-WMED analyses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.40"/>.
Since it is not suitable to initialize and drive the LES simulation using the AROME-WMED analyses directly due to too large a<?pagebreak page14654?> horizontal resolution gap, an intermediate domain with a coarser grid is used, through the nesting technique in a two-way interactive mode <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.41"/>. The coarser grid provides the lateral boundary conditions to the finer one, while the variables of the coarser grid are relaxed with a short relaxation time toward the finer grid's values in the overlapping area. Vertical grids are the same. For this present study, two nested domains in the horizontal plane with horizontal grid spacings of 900 and 150 m (hereafter HR150) were used. Another control simulation (hereafter LR450) is carried out with horizontal grid spacings of 900  and 450 m, respectively (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). The simulation domains cover nearly the same regions as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.42"/>, i.e. the southeastern France and the northwestern Mediterranean, encompassing the precipitating systems and their marine low-level moisture supplying flow (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e574">The simulations are initialized at 00:00 UTC on 26 October 2012 and run until 12:00 UTC. At 00:00 UTC and for a 3 h period, only the coarser domain with a grid spacing of 900 m (dashed rectangle in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) is started. The finer domains (450 or 150 m) are activated at 03:00 UTC and for the rest of the simulation period.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Overview of the numerical simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e588">This section aims at assessing the impact of increasing horizontal resolution by comparing both simulations over the same spatial scale. For that purpose the reference LES fields are upscaled at a coarser horizontal resolution of 450 m (hereafter LR150). The fields are thus coarse grained by averaging the LES fields as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.43"/> or <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.44"/>. We focus on the life cycle of heavy precipitation occurring over the sea mainly on the morning of 26 October 2012, with a mature phase happening between 06:00 and 12:00 UTC. During this period, the triggering mechanisms within the convective systems are examined.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e599">Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> except for simulated infrared brightness temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Comparison between LR450 and LR150 simulations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>4.1.1</label><title>Precipitation field analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e633">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> represents the surface rainfall accumulated between 06:00 and 12:00 UTC on 26 October 2012. Both LR450 and LR150 simulate the areas of strong precipitation over southeastern France fairly well. The surface rainfall over land is well reproduced in terms of magnitude and location over the Var region and over the southeastern part of the Massif Central, compared to observations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).</p>
      <?pagebreak page14655?><p id="d1e640">As for precipitation over the sea, it is worth mentioning that radar quantitative precipitation estimation is impacted by large uncertainties and in any case should be viewed cautiously. Nevertheless, two areas of strong accumulated surface rainfall are observed over the sea in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c: a first one located near 4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and a second one a few tens of kilometres southwest near 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. These regions of large precipitation are caused by the convective systems CS1 and CS2 mentioned earlier. Although only one convective system is simulated (i.e. CS2), its evolution over the sea is well simulated by both LR450 and LR150, except for a location too far west and stronger offshore rainfall just east of the Spanish coast (see area circled in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). This precipitation pattern is explained by a former convective system triggered earlier in the simulation and not dissipating in time. But the spatial distribution and magnitude of precipitation appear stronger for LR450 compared to LR150. The results presented here for LR450 are fairly comparable to those obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.45"/> with a 500 m horizontal resolution. Differences are probably due to both different initial conditions and numerical schemes in both simulations.</p>
      <p id="d1e668">In order to assess the consistency of these results along the entire simulation period, time series of surface precipitation, averaged over the subdomain represented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, are calculated. This domain encompasses the evolution of the convective system over the sea, not taking into account here precipitation on land. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows the surface precipitation averaged over the whole subdomain and averaged over the area where surface precipitation exceeds 0.1 mm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e687">One can remark that the surface precipitation simulated by LR450 is greater than LR150 from 06:00 until near 11:00 UTC on 26 October 2012 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a). However, it must be emphasized that the largest surface rainfall in LR450 from 06:00 UTC until 09:00 UTC is mainly due to more spatially widespread precipitation, whereas between 09:00 and 11:00 UTC stronger rainfall rates contribute more to the largest precipitation for LR450. The sensitivity of these results to the precipitation threshold has also been examined (not shown). Indeed, higher precipitation thresholds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) confirm that LR450 simulates stronger rainfall over a greater spatial area after 09:00 UTC.</p>
      <p id="d1e715">These results with more simulated precipitation with a horizontal resolution of 450 m, compared to the LES, are somewhat different than those obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.46"/> or <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.47"/> for instance, who found that the largest surface rainfall amounts are simulated at the finest scale. Nevertheless around 12:00 UTC, the surface rainfall simulated by LR150 becomes greater (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e728">Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> except for virtual potential temperature at the third model level (near 40 m a.g.l.) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, blue areas), water vapour horizontal flux integrated over the lowest 3000 m a.s.l. (kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, arrows), and vertical velocity exceeding 3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 500 m a.s.l. (red isolines). Black areas denote values of moisture flux exceeding 480 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page14656?><p id="d1e809">Both LR450 and LR150 are now compared by analysing the time evolution of the convection over the sea. It is worth mentioning that a convective system is triggered earlier shortly after the beginning of the simulation and was maintained in the simulation for too long.
This former convective system is responsible for the large surface precipitation accumulation just east of the Spanish coast (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). The first convective cells of interest are actually triggered a bit late in both simulations near 07:00 UTC on 26 October 2012 (not shown), leading to different behaviour and evolution during the triggering stage compared to observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e814">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> represents the simulated radar reflectivities at 09:00  and 12:00 UTC at 850 hPa compared to observations as well as horizontal winds at 950 hPa. As mentioned previously, the circulation, in which the convective system evolves, was characterized by strong low-level convergence, controlled by surface low pressure located between Spain and the Balearic Islands. This pattern enhances convergence locally in the southwesterly to southeasterly low-level flow. This surface low pressure is simulated quite similarly in both LR450 and LR150 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b and d). The mature stage is characterized by continual renewal of convective cells along the low-level convergence around 09:00 UTC as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and b. This particular organization is also visible in the observed radar reflectivities (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c). It appears that the convective system develops faster in LR450 with convection extending more northeastwards. As a matter of fact, when comparing both simulations at upper levels, i.e. analysing the infrared brightness temperature, one can see a more spatially extended convective system with a more pronounced cloudy anvil in LR450 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a and b). On the other hand, one can also remark that, for both LR450 and LR150, the coldest area in terms of brightness temperature is less spatially extended compared to the observations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c and f). This is probably related to a lack of iced hydrometeors at upper levels in the simulations. As the surface low pressure moves east–northeastwards, the low-level flow strengthens and convergence increases, organizing into a very pronounced line. Near 12:00 UTC on 26 October 2012, differences between both LR450 and LR150 become barely discernable and precipitating structures are more comparable (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c and d). At this time, both simulations show a convective system tilting along a slight southwest–northeast axis that is fairly comparable with the observed radar reflectivities (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>f).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e836">Time series of: <bold>(a)</bold> rainwater mixing ratio, <bold>(b)</bold> graupel mixing ratio, <bold>(c)</bold> snow aggregate mixing ratio, and <bold>(d)</bold> the 90th percentile of vertical velocities for LR450 and LR150 experiments,d averaged over the whole subdomain seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e860">In summary, an increase in horizontal resolution from 450 m until 150 m for this case does not significantly improve some deficiencies of the simulation.
Indeed, the low-level convergence could be closely controlled by the surface low pressure, and both LR450 and LR150 handle its strengthening very similarly. Moreover, only a single convective system is simulated in both LR450 and LR150 instead of two compared to observations, and surface rainfall that is too strong is simulated just east of Spanish coast. Nevertheless, significant differences appear between both simulations during the mature stage of the convective systems, especially in terms of the accumulation of surface precipitation, the<?pagebreak page14657?> spatial extent of the simulated systems, intensity (between 09:00  and 11:00 UTC), and the development of convection over the Mediterranean Sea.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>4.1.2</label><title>Triggering mechanisms</title>
      <p id="d1e871">In this section, the differences highlighted in terms of simulated surface precipitation patterns, convective organization, and intensity are explained by analysing the environment and the mechanisms associated with the convective systems. It has been shown in the previous section that the mature stage is simulated differently by both LR450 and LR150. The system of interest is triggered around 07:00 UTC just east of another decaying one, offshore of the Balearic Islands, slowly moving east–northeastwards over the sea. This convective system developed within a warm and moist environment and had high values of conditional convective instability (not shown) along a low-level convergence line, as discussed previously. These triggering mechanisms are quite similar to those found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.48"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.49"/> with a 2.5 km or 500 m horizontal resolution, albeit with a slight time lag.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e882">Zoomed view of the spatial distribution of warm microphysical species (sum of rain and cloud water mixing ratio) at 1500 m height for <bold>(a)</bold> the  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.50"/> simulation at 2.5 km horizontal resolution, <bold>(b)</bold> LR450, and <bold>(c)</bold> HR150. Panel <bold>(d)</bold> shows the observed radar reflectivities at 09:00 UTC on 26 October 2012.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e906">Thereafter and as also discussed previously, the systems simulated in both simulations adopt different behaviours during their mature stage. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> shows the low-level moisture flux integrated in the first 3000 m of the troposphere, the virtual potential temperature at near 40 m a.g.l. (third model level) and updraughts with a magnitude greater than 3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 500 m height, simulated for both LR450 and LR150 around the mature stage. The spatial distribution of the low-level moist flux is simulated differently in both simulations. Indeed around 09:00 UTC, LR150 simulates stronger values downstream of the convective system, whereas intense values of low-level moisture flux are located in the vicinity of the precipitating event for LR450, with a maximum value reaching near 500 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a and b). Near 12:00 UTC on 26 October 2012, the low-level moisture flux becomes stronger and more uniform for LR150, throughout the convective system (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>d), with locally stronger fluxes than LR450. Strong and pronounced updraughts are simulated for both simulations at the leading edge of the area of<?pagebreak page14658?> low-level convergence, thus evidencing the lifting of conditionally unstable air masses triggering deep convection. This area of low-level convergence and high moisture flux appears to be slightly northeast for LR150.</p>
      <p id="d1e953">Another mechanism responsible for lifting is also present and competes with the low-level convergence. Indeed, both simulations reproduce a low-level cold pool (LLCP) underneath the convective system. However, the cooling is more spatially widespread  with stronger horizontal gradients greater than 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for LR450, favouring more lifting. The LLCP interacts with the low-level flow and also locally enhances the area of convergence, as shown in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.51"/> with their simulations at 2.5 km horizontal resolution. The less intense LLCP for LR150 probably leads to a less deflected flow, stronger moisture advection, and a triggering of convection downstream compared to the system simulated by LR450.</p>
      <p id="d1e968">In order to assess how these differences on mechanisms impact the dynamics of the simulated convective systems, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> presents time series of the mixing ratios for the precipitating hydrometeors as well as the strongest updraughts, averaged over the whole subdomain shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. Precipitating hydrometeors (rain, graupel, and snow aggregates) contents and updraughts are increasing throughout the morning of 26 October 2012 until 12:00 UTC, showing a strengthening of the convective system with intense dynamics. Hydrometeor contents and vertical motions are systematically greater for LR450, sometimes exceeding the LR150 values by nearly 50 % (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e979">Vertical cross section along a convective cell for <bold>(a)</bold> LR450 and <bold>(b)</bold> HR150 at 07:45, 08:00 and 08:15 UTC. Rainwater contents (g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are represented in grey, whereas mixed precipitating hydrometeor (graupel and snow aggregate) contents (g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are highlighted in blue. The black solid line delineates the cloud boundaries (threshold of cloud and ice water contents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Updraughts (green lines) and downdraughts (orange dashed lines) are represented with a threshold of about 5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The red solid line stands for the freezing level.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1075">Dynamics of the convective system and the hydrometeor contents, leading to the LLCP and more surface precipitation, thus appear much greater in the simulation with a horizontal resolution of 450 m compared to the LES.
However, when horizontal winds and water vapour contents are examined, the low-level environment for both simulations appears quite<?pagebreak page14659?> similar, even with a slightly weaker low-level flow for LR450 (not shown). Therefore, one can argue that, for this specific IOP16a case study, the largest surface precipitation obtained for the simulation with a horizontal resolution of 450 m could be partly explained by the manner in which dynamics and microphysics are represented within the convective system and its interactions with the nearby surrounding air.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Very fine-scale convective organization</title>
      <p id="d1e1089">In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>, both simulations were compared by upscaling the LES at the same resolution as LR450. It has been shown that the increase in horizontal resolution does not modify the environment of the precipitating system significantly. The triggering mechanisms, such as the low-level convergence, are not modified significantly, except for the LLCP, which is strengthened by the possible enhancement of rainfall evaporation at low levels in the convective system.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e1096">Horizontal cross section of vertical velocities at 6 km and 8 km height throughout the convective cells displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> for <bold>(a, c)</bold> LR450 and <bold>(b, d)</bold> HR150, respectively. The black solid line delineates the cloud boundaries (threshold of cloud and ice water contents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e1137">Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/> but for the subgrid turbulent kinetic energy (TKE).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1149">In the LES, the precipitating structures are simulated and represented at a finer scale. It offers the possibility of analysing the dynamics more precisely and the convective organization down to the cell scale. Therefore, in the rest of the paper, the LES simulation will be presented at the native horizontal resolution (HR150). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> highlights the spatial distribution of the rain and cloud mixing ratios at 1500 m height for both LR450 and HR150, which are compared to the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.52"/> simulation at 2.5 km horizontal resolution. If the kilometric simulation develops a convective structure within the low-level convergence, it is unable to organize small convective cells, as depicted at hectometric resolution (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a compared to b and c). This simulated organization with trains of very small convective cells are also depicted and confirmed by radar observations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>d).</p>
      <p id="d1e1161">Within the southernmost part of the precipitating system, one can see intense convective cell trains, oriented southwest to northeast and triggered and organized along the low-level convergence. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> shows a vertical cross section along a convective cell between 07:45 and 08:15 UTC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>), in both LR450 and HR150, of the simulated precipitating hydrometeor contents (rain, graupel, and snow aggregate contents) and the non-precipitating (cloud and ice) water contents. Vertical motions (updraughts and downdraughts)<?pagebreak page14660?> are also represented. At the beginning of the developing stage at 07:45 UTC, for LR450 the non-precipitating hydrometeors depict a rather shallow cloud with a base below 500 m a.s.l. (above sea level). There are some mixed hydrometeor contents appearing at 08:00 UTC, but they are limited to 5–6 km height (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>c). Very quickly – 15 min later – at 08:15 UTC, strong upward motions are simulated within the cell, associated with large graupel contents of up to 9 km height (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>e). When reaching the top of the troposphere, a cloudy anvil forms and fans out downstream of the upper-level southwesterly flow.</p>
      <p id="d1e1187">However, the cloud appearance is quite different and especially more realistic for HR150. Indeed, the structure is still organized with pronounced hydrometeor amounts advected upwards within convective updraughts but, in this case, there are stronger gradients of vertical velocity located all along the edge of the convective cell, i.e. downward motions in the environment neighbouring and abutting strong updraughts at the cloud edge. Moreover in HR150, the cloud takes a clearly discernible cumuliform appearance throughout the entire period of the developing stage, which might be an indication of a better representation of cloud-edge entrainment and therefore a better representation, at this scale, of horizontal turbulent mixing between the cloud and its environment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b, d, and f).</p>
      <?pagebreak page14661?><p id="d1e1192">In order to illustrate that point, Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/> show horizontal cross sections of vertical velocities, subgrid turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) at 6   and 8 km height, and both dynamical (DP) and thermal (TP) contributions in the TKE production at 6 km height, throughout the convective cells displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>. As one can see in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>a and c and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>a and c, at 450 m horizontal resolution, the updraught cores are partly resolved, as vertical velocities do not exceed 12 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and are also partly unresolved, with TKE sometimes higher than 30 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This TKE is produced by both dynamical and thermal processes and is mainly localized within the updraught cores. The eddies near the cloud edges, which are subgrid at 450 m horizontal resolution, are not represented  by the turbulence scheme. These results are in a good agreement with those obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.53"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.54"/>, who have shown that a commonly used eddy-diffusivity turbulence scheme underestimates the TKE at kilometric and hectometric (500 m) horizontal resolution, especially at the cloud edges but also in the updraught cores where the thermal production is misrepresented as the scheme does not enable the countergradient structures present in the updraught to be reproduced.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e1249">Horizontal cross section of thermal production (TP) and dynamical production (DP) at 6 km height throughout the convective cells displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> for: <bold>(a, c)</bold> LR450, and <bold>(b, d)</bold> HR150.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f14.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e1269">Three-dimensional rendering of the simulated convective cell from HR150 between 09:00 and 10:00 UTC, in terms of rainwater, cloud water, graupel, snow aggregate, and ice water contents. Panels also show updraughts exceeding 5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (green colour) and downdraughts stronger than 2 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (orange colour).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f15.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1302">At 150 m horizontal resolution, these eddies, as well as the updraught cores, are becoming better resolved as ascents exceed 12 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over large areas. Furthermore, the strongest updraughts are neighboured by strong downdraughts (exceeding 10 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) just outside the cloud edge that might be associated with a subsiding shell (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>b and d). At 150 m the unresolved flow is mainly located at cloud edges and a significant part of the TKE contribution comes from the 3D dynamical production linked to the entrainment process. As a matter of fact, a clear signature is simulated along the cloud edge in HR150 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>d). As a consequence,  it is possible to argue that the entrainment process, especially along the cloud edge, is strongly underestimated at 450 m horizontal resolution, which might lead to less entrainment of drier environmental air in the clouds, and thus LR450 simulates too rapid a development of the convective system and greater surface rainfall compared to HR150.</p>
      <p id="d1e1333">This issue of the representation of entrainment between clouds and their environment at LES scale has been also assessed by other previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.55"><named-content content-type="post">among others</named-content></xref>. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.56"/> also compared LES with horizontal resolutions of 150  and 450 m for a continental deep-convection case. They found that, even if moving from a kilometric grid spacing to LES does improve the representation of their case study, their LES-150 m does not adequately represent the associated small-scale forcing mechanisms. Moreover, in that case, higher resolutions worsen results due to relatively more environmental entrainment, and moisture updraughts thus appear too diluted. On the other hand some previous studies also confirm the point that LESs are primarily impacted by the mesoscale meteorological forcing through the lateral boundary conditions. As a result, even an LES with a horizontal resolution of 50 m does not significantly improve the quantitative precipitation forecast <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.57"/>. These previous studies confirm that increased horizontal resolution for LES grid<?pagebreak page14662?> spacing is necessary to better represent the small-scale processes governing deep-convection organization, even if there is still further progress to be made in current parameterizations at this scale.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16"><?xmltex \currentcnt{16}?><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p id="d1e1349">Schematic drawings of the precipitation structures of the convective systems and triggering ingredients observed during HyMeX IOP16a on 26 October 2012, at the <bold>(a)</bold> synoptic scale, <bold>(b)</bold> mesoscale, and <bold>(c)</bold> cell scale, respectively.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14649/2020/acp-20-14649-2020-f16.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1367">Furthermore, the LES simulation also better represents the spatial and temporal convective organization at the cell scale within the precipitating system. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/> illustrates a 3D rendering of the convective cell simulated by HR150 between 09:00 and 09:40 UTC. At 09:00 UTC one can see a well-developed cumulus cloud, forming a well-simulated arcus cloud just in front of very intense rainfall underneath the storms (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>a). It is possible to track the cell across the following 10 min. It continues to expand spatially and vertically in the following 10 min while developing a stratiform part and stronger subsidence downstream (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>b). Finally around 09:40 UTC, the convective cell reaches its mature stage (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>c) before loosing its identity, and it is no longer discernible as it merges gradually with the rest of the precipitating system (not shown).</p>
      <p id="d1e1379">An animation of this 3D rendering performed with very high temporal resolution (every 1 min) is very useful to better understand the 3D circulation within the precipitating system. The animation is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6096/mistrals-hymex.1540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6096/mistrals-hymex.1540</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.58"/>. The southwest to southeasterly low-level flow initiates convective cells just at the inner edge of the resulting strong convergence that, hereafter, propagate northwards while developing in the southwesterly upper-level flow.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1396">This study examines the impact of increasing horizontal resolution for LES in a numerical simulation of a real case study of Mediterranean HPE. For that purpose and for the first time, a large domain encompassing the convective systems and the low-level flow feeding convection over the Mediterranean sea, is considered. The goal here was to assess precisely how the physical mechanisms and convective organization are represented from a sub-kilometric scale down to LES horizontal resolution. The paper focuses on an offshore convection case study, which took place on 26 October 2012 during the HyMeX SOP1. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/> summarizes the<?pagebreak page14663?> precipitation structures of the convective systems as well as the triggering mechanisms analysed during this HyMeX case study.</p>
      <p id="d1e1401">The convective systems observed during IOP16a were fed all along their evolution over the sea by moist and conditionally unstable air masses. A southwest to southeasterly converging low-level flow is the main triggering mechanism acting to continually initiate and maintain the renewal of convective cells, contributing to a back-building-shaped system (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>b). The low-level convergence was enhanced strongly by a surface low pressure located between Spain and the Balearic Islands (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>a).</p>
      <p id="d1e1408">First, an LES carried out at 150 m horizontal resolution is compared, at the same scale, to another simulation performed with a 450 m grid spacing. On one hand, the increase in horizontal resolution from 450  until 150 m is not able, for this case study, to improve significantly deficiencies of the simulation. Indeed, the simulated converging low-level flow is quite similar in both simulations and only a single convective system is represented by both simulations instead of two compared to observations.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14664?><p id="d1e1411">Although the present study does not present any sensitivity experiments to assess their precise role, initial and lateral boundary conditions might impact the simulations. The predictability of this heavy-precipitation event, associated with offshore deep convection over the sea, is relatively low compared with more classical events anchored over the mountain range foothills. The direct orographic forcing appeared less crucial while the convective systems were moving over the sea, but the neighbouring mountains were able to deflect the environmental mesoscale flow. Moreover, the model physics could also have a strong impact on the simulations. As a matter of fact, for this case study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.59"/> showed that the formulation of the mixing length impacts the simulated surface precipitation through, in some cases, greater low-level moisture advection and hydrometeor contents within the convective system. Moreover, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.60"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.61"/> even showed that taking into account the wave effect or sea surface conditions in different parameterizations of the sea state is able to locally modify the spatial distribution of the precipitation, although the overall rainfall pattern is globally well reproduced.</p>
      <p id="d1e1424">All these aspects are important, but it must be emphasized that, during the IOP16a case, the location and the evolution of deep convection over the sea (in particular the split into two distinct systems CS1 and CS2) are closely controlled by the upstream conditions (i.e. low-level moisture convergence generated by a surface low pressure located between Spain and the Balearic Islands) and how they propagate inside of the LES domains. This split of deep convection over the sea is a real challenge for this case study. Another numerical experiment could consider a larger LES domain encompassing these upstream conditions. Although this LES over a very large domain would suffer from expansive computing time, it would be able to address whether a higher-resolution simulation of these features is crucial. Furthermore, there were numerous dedicated observations, in particular over the Mediterranean sea, during HyMeX SOP1 that captured fairly well the wind and moisture spatial and vertical features of the upstream flow heading towards the French Mediterranean coastal regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.62"/>. A posteriori assimilation of these field research observations could improve the quality of kilometric-scale analyses arising from AROME-WMED for example. As a matter of fact, a reanalysis, including HyMeX observations, was carried out recently with AROME-WMED <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.63"/>. New initial and lateral boundary conditions provided by this reanalysis may help improve the representation of the mesoscale flow over the sea for this case study.</p>
      <p id="d1e1433">On the other hand, the increase in horizontal resolution modifies the representation of some of triggering and organizing mechanisms controlling the precipitating system. More intense low-level cold pools are simulated with a horizontal resolution of 450 m, probably related to the evaporation of greater falling precipitation at least at the beginning of the simulation. As a matter of fact, at 150 m the unresolved flow is mainly located at cloud edges and a significant part of the turbulent kinetic energy contribution comes from the 3D dynamical production  linked to the entrainment process. As a consequence,  it is possible to argue that the entrainment process, especially along the cloud edge, is strongly underestimated at 450 m horizontal resolution, which might lead to less entrainment of dryer environmental air in the clouds that could explain why LR450 simulates too rapid a development of the convective system, greater surface rainfall, and stronger low-level cold pools compared to HR150.</p>
      <p id="d1e1436">Obviously, the results presented here need to be confirmed considering more convective case studies and using more statistical approaches. However, this first LES of a real Mediterranean precipitating case study highlighted an organization in fast-propagating and developing cell trains within the converging low-level flow (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>), features that are definitively out of range of the kilometric resolution. In a general way, the goal of ongoing and future work is to better represent the key processes in the models at hectometric scales, such as turbulence and microphysics, that are crucial to progress in heavy-precipitation forecasts.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1445">Since version 5.1 was released in 2014, Meso-NH has been
freely available under the CeCILL-C license agreement. CeCILL is a free software
license, explicitly compatible with GNU GPL. The CeCILL-C license agreement
grants users the right to modify and re-use the covered software.
The dataset on which this paper is based (LES raw data) is too large to be publicly
archived with available resources. However a time-lapse video of this LES is available
at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6096/mistrals-hymex.1540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6096/mistrals-hymex.1540</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.64"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="videosupplement"><title>Video supplement</title>

      <p id="d1e1457">For the first time large eddy simulations (LESs) of
Mediterranean convective systems, initialized with real observed conditions
(AROME-WMED), over a large domain encompassing the northwestern
Mediterranean (900 million grid points) were carried out for IOP16a and IOP13. The
time-lapse video for IOP16a highlights the realistic growing stage of the convective
cells, from shallow cumuliform stage until regenerating deep-cell trains within a low-level convergence line. The video supplement is available at
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6096/mistrals-hymex.1540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6096/mistrals-hymex.1540</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.65"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e1469">MM, FD, and ON performed the numerical experiments and
analysed the data and the results. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the
results. ON took the lead in writing the paper. VD and CL provided critical
feedback and helped shape the analysis and paper. Finally, all authors discussed
the results and contributed to the final paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e1475">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e1481">This article is part of the special issue “Hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean (ACP/AMT/GMD/HESS/NHESS/OS inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1487">This work represents a contribution to the HyMeX programme supported by MISTRALS and the ANR MUSIC grant ANR-14-CE01-0014. The authors are grateful to all the scientists involved in the HYMEX SOP1 field campaign. Thanks are also due to Clément Strauss for his skill in model field visualization. Finally, we would like to thank Timothy J. Dunkerton, as well as the two reviewers, for their precise and constructive remarks, which significantly helped improve the paper.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <?pagebreak page14665?><p id="d1e1492">This research has been supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-14-CE01-0014).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e1499">This paper was edited by Timothy J. Dunkerton and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Barthlott and Davolio(2016)</label><?label Barthlott16?><mixed-citation>Barthlott, C. and Davolio, S.: Mechanisms initiating heavy precipitation over
Italy during HyMeX Special Observation Period 1: a numerical case study using
two mesoscale models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
142, 238–258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2630" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2630</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Barthlott et al.(2016)Barthlott, Adler, Kalthoff, Handwerker, Kohler,
and Wieser</label><?label Barthlott16b?><mixed-citation>Barthlott, C., Adler, B., Kalthoff, N., Handwerker, J., Kohler, M., and Wieser,
A.: The role of Corsica in initiating nocturnal offshore convection,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 222–237,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2415" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2415</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bougeault and Lacarrère(1989)</label><?label Bougeault89?><mixed-citation>
Bougeault, P. and Lacarrère, P.: Parameterization of orography-induced
turbulence in a meso-beta-scale model, Mon. Weather Rev., 123, 1560–1573,
1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bryan et al.(2003)Bryan, Wyngaard, and Fritsch</label><?label Bryan03?><mixed-citation>Bryan, G. H., Wyngaard, J. C., and Fritsch, J. M.: Resolution Requirements for
the Simulation of Deep Moist Convection, Mon. Weather Rev., 131,
2394–2416, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131&lt;2394:RRFTSO&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131&lt;2394:RRFTSO&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Buzzi et al.(2014)Buzzi, Davolio, Malguzzi, Drofa, and
Mastrangelo</label><?label Buzzi14?><mixed-citation>Buzzi, A., Davolio, S., Malguzzi, P., Drofa, O., and Mastrangelo, D.: Heavy rainfall episodes over Liguria in autumn 2011: numerical forecasting experiments, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1325–1340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1325-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-14-1325-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Caniaux et al.(1994)Caniaux, Redelsperger, and Lafore</label><?label Caniaux94?><mixed-citation>
Caniaux, G., Redelsperger, J.-L., and Lafore, J.-P.: A numerical study of the
stratiform region of a fast-moving squall line. 1. general description and
water and heat budgets., J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2046–2074, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Colella and Woodward(1984)</label><?label Colella84?><mixed-citation>Colella, P. and Woodward, P. R.: The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for
gas-dynamical simulations, Journal of Computational Physics, 54, 174–201,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(84)90143-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-9991(84)90143-8</ext-link>,
1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Cuxart et al.(2000)Cuxart, Bougeault, and Redelsperger</label><?label Cuxart00?><mixed-citation>
Cuxart, J., Bougeault, P., and Redelsperger, J.-L.: A turbulence scheme
allowing for mesoscale and large-eddy simulations., Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 1–30, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Dauhut et al.(2015)Dauhut, Chaboureau, Escobar, and
Mascart</label><?label Dauhut15?><mixed-citation>Dauhut, T., Chaboureau, J.-P., Escobar, J., and Mascart, P.: Large-eddy
simulations of Hector the convector making the stratosphere wetter,
Atmospheric Science Letters, 16, 135–140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/asl2.534" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/asl2.534</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Dauhut et al.(2016)Dauhut, Chaboureau, Escobar, and
Mascart</label><?label Dauhut16?><mixed-citation>Dauhut, T., Chaboureau, J.-P., Escobar, J., and Mascart, P.: Giga-LES of Hector
the Convector and Its Two Tallest Updrafts up to the Stratosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 5041–5060, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0083.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-16-0083.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Davolio et al.(2016)Davolio, Volonté, Manzato, Pucillo, Cicogna, and
Ferrario</label><?label Davolio16?><mixed-citation>Davolio, S., Volonté, A., Manzato, A., Pucillo, A., Cicogna, A., and Ferrario,
M. E.: Mechanisms producing different precipitation patterns over
north-eastern Italy: insights from HyMeX-SOP1 and previous events, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 188–205,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2731" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2731</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Deardorff(1972)</label><?label DearDorff72?><mixed-citation>Deardorff, J. W.: Numerical Investigation of Neutral and Unstable Planetary
Boundary Layers, J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 91–115,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029&lt;0091:NIONAU&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029&lt;0091:NIONAU&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Ducrocq et al.(2008)Ducrocq, Nuissier, Ricard, Lebeaupin, and
Thouvenin</label><?label Ducrocq08?><mixed-citation>
Ducrocq, V., Nuissier, O., Ricard, D., Lebeaupin, C., and Thouvenin, T.: A
numerical study of three catastrophic precipitatating events over southern
France. II: Mesoscale triggering and stationarity factors, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 134, 131–145, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Ducrocq et al.(2014)Ducrocq, Braud, Davolio, Ferretti, Flamant,
Jansa, Kalthoff, Richard, Taupier-Letage, Ayral, Belamari, Berne, Borga,
Boudevillain, Bock, Boichard, Bouin, Bousquet, Bouvier, Chiggiato, Cimini,
Corsmeier, Coppola, Cocquerez, Defer, Delanoë, Di Girolamo, Doerenbecher,
Drobinski, Dufournet, Fourrié, Gourley, Labatut, Lambert, Le Coz, Marzano,
Molinié, Montani, Nord, Nuret, Ramage, Rison, Roussot, Said, Schwarzenboeck,
Testor, Van Baelen, Vincendon, Aran, and Tamayo</label><?label Ducrocq14?><mixed-citation>
Ducrocq, V., Braud, I., Davolio, S., Ferretti, R., Flamant, C., Jansa, A.,
Kalthoff, N., Richard, E., Taupier-Letage, I., Ayral, P.-A., Belamari, S.,
Berne, A., Borga, M., Boudevillain, B., Bock, O., Boichard, J.-L., Bouin,
M.-N., Bousquet, O., Bouvier, C., Chiggiato, J., Cimini, D., Corsmeier, U.,
Coppola, L., Cocquerez, P., Defer, E., Delanoë, J., Di Girolamo, P.,
Doerenbecher, A., Drobinski, P., Dufournet, Y., Fourrié, N., Gourley, J.,
Labatut, L., Lambert, D., Le Coz, J., Marzano, F., Molinié, G., Montani, A.,
Nord, G., Nuret, M., Ramage, K., Rison, W., Roussot, O., Said, F.,
Schwarzenboeck, A., Testor, P., Van Baelen, J., Vincendon, B., Aran, M., and
Tamayo, J.: HyMeX-SOP1: The Field Campaign Dedicated to Heavy Precipitation
and Flash Flooding in the Northwestern Mediterranean, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 1083–1100, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Ducrocq et al.(2016)Ducrocq, Davolio, Ferretti, Flamant, Santaner,
Kalthoff, Richard, and Wernli</label><?label Ducrocq16?><mixed-citation>Ducrocq, V., Davolio, S., Ferretti, R., Flamant, C., Santaner, V. H., Kalthoff,
N., Richard, E., and Wernli, H.: Introduction to the HyMeX Special Issue on
‘Advances in understanding and forecasting of heavy precipitation in the
Mediterranean through the HyMeX SOP1 field campaign’, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 1–6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2856" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2856</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Duffourg et al.(2016)Duffourg, Nuissier, Ducrocq, Olivier Bock,
Chazette, Delanoë, Doerenbecher, Flamant, Fourrié, di Girolamo, Lac,
Martinet, and Said</label><?label Duffourg16?><mixed-citation>Duffourg, F., Nuissier, O., Ducrocq, V., Olivier Bock, O., Chazette, P.,
Delanoë, J., Doerenbecher, A., Flamant, C., Fourrié, N., di Girolamo, P.,
Lac, C., Martinet, M., and Said, F.: Offshore deep convection initiation and
maintenmain during HyMeX IOP 16a heavy precipitation event, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol.
Soc., 142, 259–274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2725" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2725</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Duffourg et al.(2018)Duffourg, Lee, Ducrocq, Flamant, Chazette, and
Di Girolamo</label><?label Duffourg18?><mixed-citation>Duffourg, F., Lee, K.-O., Ducrocq, V., Flamant, C., Chazette, P., and
Di Girolamo, P.: Role of moisture patterns in the backbuilding formation of
HyMeX IOP13 heavy precipitation systems, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 291–303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3201</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Fiori et al.(2017)Fiori, Ferraris, Molini, Siccardi, Kranzlmueller,
and Parodi</label><?label Fiori17?><mixed-citation>
Fiori, E., Ferraris, L., Molini, L., Siccardi, F., Kranzlmueller, D., and
Parodi, A.: Triggering and evolution of a deep convective system in the
Mediterranean Sea: modelling and observations at a very fine scale, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 927–941, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fourri\'{e} et~al.(2015)Fourri\'{e}, Bresson, Nuret, Jany, Brousseau,
Doerenbecher, Kreitz, Nuissier, Sevault, B\'{e}nichou, Amodei, and
Pouponneau}}?><label>Fourrié et al.(2015)Fourrié, Bresson, Nuret, Jany, Brousseau,
Doerenbecher, Kreitz, Nuissier, Sevault, Bénichou, Amodei, and
Pouponneau</label><?label Fourrie15?><mixed-citation>Fourrié, N., Bresson, É., Nuret, M., Jany, C., Brousseau, P., Doerenbecher, A., Kreitz, M., Nuissier, O., Sevault, E., Bénichou, H., Amodei, M., and Pouponneau, F.: AROME-WMED, a real-time mesoscale model designed for the HyMeX special observation periods, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1919–1941, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1919-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-1919-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fourri\'{e} et~al.(2019)Fourri\'{e}, Nuret, Brousseau, Caumont,
Doerenbecher, Wattrelot, Moll, B\'{e}nichou, Puech, Bock, Bosser, Chazette,
Flamant, Di~Girolamo, Richard, and Sa\"{\i}d}}?><label>Fourrié et al.(2019)Fourrié, Nuret, Brousseau, Caumont,
Doerenbecher, Wattrelot, Moll, Bénichou, Puech, Bock, Bosser, Chazette,
Flamant, Di Girolamo, Richard, and Saïd</label><?label Fourrie19?><mixed-citation>Fourrié, N., Nuret, M., Brousseau, P., Caumont, O., Doerenbecher, A., Wattrelot, E., Moll, P., Bénichou, H., Puech, D., Bock, O., Bosser, P., Chazette, P., Flamant, C., Di Girolamo, P., Richard, E., and Saïd, F.: The AROME-WMED reanalyses of the first special observation period of the Hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean experiment (HyMeX), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2657–2678, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2657-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-2657-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Gal-Chen and Somerville(1975)</label><?label Gal-Chen75?><mixed-citation>Gal-Chen, T. and Somerville, R. C. J.: On the use of a coordinate
transformation for the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations, J. Comput.
Phys., 17, 209–228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(75)90037-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-9991(75)90037-6</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14666?><ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Glenn and Krueger(2014)</label><?label Glenn14?><mixed-citation>Glenn, I. B. and Krueger, S. K.: Downdrafts in the near cloud environment of
deep convective updrafts, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 6,
1–8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000261" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013MS000261</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Hanley et al.(2015)Hanley, Plant, Stein, Hogan, Nicol, Lean,
Halliwell, and Clark</label><?label Hanley15?><mixed-citation>Hanley, K. E., Plant, R. S., Stein, T. H. M., Hogan, R. J., Nicol, J. C., Lean,
H. W., Halliwell, C., and Clark, P. A.: Mixing-length controls on
high-resolution simulations of convective storms, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 272–284,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2356</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Heath et al.(2017)Heath, Fuelberg, Tanelli, Turk, Lawson, Woods, and
Freeman</label><?label Heath17?><mixed-citation>Heath, N. K., Fuelberg, H. E., Tanelli, S., Turk, F. J., Lawson, R. P., Woods,
S., and Freeman, S.: WRF nested large-eddy simulations of deep convection
during SEAC4RS, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,
3953–3974, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025465" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025465</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Heus et al.(2009)Heus, J. Pols, J. Jonker, A. Van den Akker, and
H. Lenschow</label><?label Heus09?><mixed-citation>Heus, T., J. Pols, C. F., J. Jonker, H. J., A. Van den Akker, H. E., and
H. Lenschow, D.: Observational validation of the compensating mass flux
through the shell around cumulus clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 101–112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.358" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.358</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Honnert et al.(2011)Honnert, Masson, and Couvreux</label><?label Honnert11?><mixed-citation>Honnert, R., Masson, V., and Couvreux, F.: A Diagnostic for Evaluating the
Representation of Turbulence in Atmospheric Models at the Kilometric Scale,
J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 3112–3131,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-061.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-11-061.1</ext-link>,  2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Jansa et al.(2001)Jansa, Genoves, Angeles Picornell, Campins,
Riosalido, and Carretero</label><?label Jansa01?><mixed-citation>
Jansa, A., Genoves, A., Angeles Picornell, M., Campins, J., Riosalido, R., and
Carretero, O.: Western Mediterranean cyclones and heavy rain. Part 2:
Statistical approach, Meteorol. Appl., 8, 43–56, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Khairoutdinov et al.(2009)Khairoutdinov, Krueger, Moeng, Bogenschutz,
and Randall</label><?label Khairoutdinov09?><mixed-citation>Khairoutdinov, M. F., Krueger, S. K., Moeng, C.-H., Bogenschutz, P. A., and
Randall, D. A.: Large-Eddy Simulation of Maritime Deep Tropical Convection,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 1, 15,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.15" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.15</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Lac et al.(2018)Lac, Chaboureau, Masson, Pinty, Tulet, Escobar,
Leriche, Barthe, Aouizerats, Augros, Aumond, Auguste, Bechtold, Berthet,
Bielli, Bosseur, Caumont, Cohard, Colin, Couvreux, Cuxart, Delautier, Dauhut,
Ducrocq, Filippi, Gazen, Geoffroy, Gheusi, Honnert, Lafore, Brossier, Libois,
Lunet, Mari, Maric, Mascart, Mogé, Molinié, Nuissier, Pantillon, Peyrillé,
Pergaud, Perraud, Pianezze, Redelsperger, Ricard, Richard, Riette, Rodier,
Schoetter, Seyfried, Stein, Suhre, Taufour, Thouron, Turner, Verrelle, Vié,
Visentin, Vionnet, and Wautelet</label><?label Lac18?><mixed-citation>Lac, C., Chaboureau, J.-P., Masson, V., Pinty, J.-P., Tulet, P., Escobar, J., Leriche, M., Barthe, C., Aouizerats, B., Augros, C., Aumond, P., Auguste, F., Bechtold, P., Berthet, S., Bielli, S., Bosseur, F., Caumont, O., Cohard, J.-M., Colin, J., Couvreux, F., Cuxart, J., Delautier, G., Dauhut, T., Ducrocq, V., Filippi, J.-B., Gazen, D., Geoffroy, O., Gheusi, F., Honnert, R., Lafore, J.-P., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Libois, Q., Lunet, T., Mari, C., Maric, T., Mascart, P., Mogé, M., Molinié, G., Nuissier, O., Pantillon, F., Peyrillé, P., Pergaud, J., Perraud, E., Pianezze, J., Redelsperger, J.-L., Ricard, D., Richard, E., Riette, S., Rodier, Q., Schoetter, R., Seyfried, L., Stein, J., Suhre, K., Taufour, M., Thouron, O., Turner, S., Verrelle, A., Vié, B., Visentin, F., Vionnet, V., and Wautelet, P.: Overview of the Meso-NH model version 5.4 and its applications, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1929–1969, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1929-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-1929-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Lunet et al.(2017)Lunet, Lac, Auguste, Visentin, Masson, and
Escobar</label><?label Lunet17?><mixed-citation>Lunet, T., Lac, C., Auguste, F., Visentin, F., Masson, V., and Escobar, J.:
Combination of WENO and Explicit Runge–Kutta Methods for Wind Transport in
the Meso-NH Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 3817–3838,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0343.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/MWR-D-16-0343.1</ext-link>,  2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Machado and Chaboureau(2015)</label><?label Machado15?><mixed-citation>
Machado, L. A. T. and Chaboureau, J.-P.: Effect of Turbulence Parameterization
on Assessment of Cloud Organization, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 3246–3262, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Martinet et al.(2017)Martinet, Nuissier, Duffourg, Ducrocq, and
Ricard</label><?label Martinet17?><mixed-citation>Martinet, M., Nuissier, O., Duffourg, F., Ducrocq, V., and Ricard, D.:
Fine-scale numerical analysis of the sensitivity of the HyMeX IOP16a heavy
precipitating event to the turbulent mixing-length parametrization, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 3122–3135,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3167</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Masson et al.(2013)Masson, Le Moigne, Martin, Faroux, Alias, Alkama,
Belamari, Barbu, Boone, Bouyssel, Brousseau, Brun, Calvet, Carrer, Decharme,
Delire, Donier, Essaouini, Gibelin, Giordani, Habets, Jidane, Kerdraon,
Kourzeneva, Lafaysse, Lafont, Lebeaupin Brossier, Lemonsu, Mahfouf,
Marguinaud, Mokhtari, Morin, Pigeon, Salgado, Seity, Taillefer, Tanguy,
Tulet, Vincendon, Vionnet, and Voldoire</label><?label Masson13?><mixed-citation>Masson, V., Le Moigne, P., Martin, E., Faroux, S., Alias, A., Alkama, R., Belamari, S., Barbu, A., Boone, A., Bouyssel, F., Brousseau, P., Brun, E., Calvet, J.-C., Carrer, D., Decharme, B., Delire, C., Donier, S., Essaouini, K., Gibelin, A.-L., Giordani, H., Habets, F., Jidane, M., Kerdraon, G., Kourzeneva, E., Lafaysse, M., Lafont, S., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Lemonsu, A., Mahfouf, J.-F., Marguinaud, P., Mokhtari, M., Morin, S., Pigeon, G., Salgado, R., Seity, Y., Taillefer, F., Tanguy, G., Tulet, P., Vincendon, B., Vionnet, V., and Voldoire, A.: The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 929–960, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Mlawer et al.(1997)Mlawer, Taubman, Brown, Iacono, and
Clough</label><?label Mlawer97?><mixed-citation>Mlawer, E., Taubman, S., Brown, P., Iacono, M., and Clough, S.: Radiative
transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, A validated correlated-k model
for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16663–16682,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD00237</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Nuissier(2019)</label><?label Nuissier19?><mixed-citation>Nuissier, O.: Time-lapse video of the Intense Observation Period (IOP) 16a case
study, SEDOO OMP, HyMeX database, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6096/mistrals-hymex.1540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6096/mistrals-hymex.1540</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Nuissier et al.(2008)Nuissier, Ducrocq, Ricard, Lebeaupin, and
Anquetin</label><?label Nuissier08?><mixed-citation>
Nuissier, O., Ducrocq, V., Ricard, D., Lebeaupin, C., and Anquetin, S.: A
numerical study of three catastrophic precipitating events over southern
France. I: Numerical framework and synoptic ingredients, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 134, 111–130, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Pergaud et al.(2009)Pergaud, Masson, and Malardel</label><?label Pergaud09?><mixed-citation>
Pergaud, J., Masson, V., and Malardel, S.: A parameterization of dry thermals
and shallow cumuli for mesoscale numerical weather prediction., Bound.-Layer
Meteor., 132, 83–106, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Petch(2006)</label><?label Petch06?><mixed-citation>Petch, J. C.: Sensitivity studies of developing convection in a cloud-resolving
model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 345–358,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.71" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1256/qj.05.71</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Pinty and Jabouille(1998)</label><?label Pinty98?><mixed-citation>
Pinty, J.-P. and Jabouille, P.: A mixed-phase cloud parameterization for use in
mesoscale non-hydrostatic model: simulations of a squall line and of
orographic precipitations, in: Proc. Conf. of Cloud Physics, Everett, WA,
USA, 17–21 August 1998, 217–220, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Rainaud et al.(2017)Rainaud, Brossier, Ducrocq, and
Giordani</label><?label Rainaud17?><mixed-citation>Rainaud, R., Brossier, C. L., Ducrocq, V., and Giordani, H.: High-resolution
air–sea coupling impact on two heavy precipitation events in the Western
Mediterranean, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143,
2448–2462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3098</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Scheffknecht et al.(2016)Scheffknecht, Richard, and
Lambert</label><?label Scheffknecht16?><mixed-citation>Scheffknecht, P., Richard, E., and Lambert, D.: A highly localized
high-precipitation event over Corsica, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 206–221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2795" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2795</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Shu and Osher(1988)</label><?label Shu88?><mixed-citation>Shu, C.-W. and Osher, S.: Efficient implementation of essentially
non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, Journal of Computational Physics,
77, 439–471, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5</ext-link>,
1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Stein et al.(2000)Stein, Richard, Lafore, Pinty, Asencio, and
Cosma</label><?label Stein00?><mixed-citation>
Stein, J., Richard, E., Lafore, J.-P., Pinty, J.-P., Asencio, N., and Cosma,
S.: High-resolution non-hydrostatic simulations of flash-flood episodes with
grid-nesting and ice phase, Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 72, 203–221, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Stein et al.(2015)Stein, Hogan, Clark, Halliwell, Hanley, Lean,
Nicol, and Plant</label><?label Stein15?><mixed-citation>
Stein, T. H. M., Hogan, R. J., Clark, P. A., Halliwell, C. E., Hanley, K. E.,
Lean, H. W., Nicol, J. C., and Plant, R. S.: The DYMECS Project: A
Statistical Approach for the Evaluation of Convective Storms in
High-Resolution NWP Models, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96,
939–951, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Strauss et al.(2019)Strauss, Ricard, Lac, and Verrelle</label><?label Strauss19?><mixed-citation>Strauss, C., Ricard, D., Lac, C., and Verrelle, A.: Evaluation of turbulence
parametrizations in convective clouds and their environment based on a
large-eddy simulation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
145, 3195–3217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3614" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3614</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Talbot et al.(2012)Talbot, Bou-Zeid, and Smith</label><?label Talbot12?><mixed-citation>Talbot, C., Bou-Zeid, E., and Smith, J.: Nested Mesoscale Large-Eddy
Simulations with WRF: Performance in Real Test Cases, Journal of
Hydrometeorology, 13, 1421–1441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-048.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM-D-11-048.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14667?><ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Thévenot et al.(2016)Thévenot, Bouin, Ducrocq, Lebeaupin Brossier,
Nuissier, Pianezze, and Duffourg</label><?label Thevenot16?><mixed-citation>Thévenot, O., Bouin, M.-N., Ducrocq, V., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Nuissier, O.,
Pianezze, J., and Duffourg, F.: Influence of the sea state on Mediterranean
heavy precipitation: a case-study from HyMeX SOP1, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 377–389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2660" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2660</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Verrelle et al.(2015)Verrelle, Ricard, and Lac</label><?label Verrelle15?><mixed-citation>Verrelle, A., Ricard, D., and Lac, C.: Sensitivity of high‐resolution
idealized simulations of thunderstorms to horizontal resolution and
turbulence parametrization, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141,  433–448, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2363" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2363</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Verrelle et al.(2017)Verrelle, Ricard, and Lac</label><?label Verrelle17?><mixed-citation>Verrelle, A., Ricard, D., and Lac, C.: Evaluation and Improvement of Turbulence
Parameterization inside Deep Convective Clouds at Kilometer-Scale Resolution,
Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 3947–3967, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0404.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/MWR-D-16-0404.1</ext-link>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Wyngaard(2004)</label><?label Wyngaard04?><mixed-citation>Wyngaard, J. C.: Toward Numerical Modeling in the “Terra Incognita”,
J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1816–1826,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;1816:TNMITT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;1816:TNMITT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Zängl et al.(2015)Zängl, Reinert, Rípodas, and Baldauf</label><?label Zangl15?><mixed-citation>Zängl, G., Reinert, D., Rípodas, P., and Baldauf, M.: The ICON (ICOsahedral
Non-hydrostatic) modelling framework of DWD and MPI-M: Description of the
non-hydrostatic dynamical core, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 563–579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2378" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2378</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Hectometric-scale simulations of a Mediterranean heavy-precipitation event during the Hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX) first Special Observation Period (SOP1)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Offshore convection occurred over the Mediterranean sea on 26 October 2012 and was well documented during the first Special Observation Period (SOP1) of the Hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX). This paper analyses the triggering and organizing factors involved in this convection case study, and examines how they are simulated and represented at hectometric resolutions. For that purpose, a large-eddy simulation (LES) of this real case study is carried out with a 150&thinsp;m horizontal resolution over a large domain encompassing the convective systems and the low-level flow feeding convection over the sea. This LES is then compared to a reference simulation performed with a 450&thinsp;m grid spacing in the heart of the so-called <q>grey zone</q> of turbulence modelling.</p><p>An increase in horizontal resolution from 450  down to 150&thinsp;m is unable, for this case study, to reduce significantly deficiencies of the simulation; this is more related to an issue of initial and lateral boundary conditions. Indeed, some of the triggering factors, such as a converging low-level flow driven by a surface low-pressure system, are simulated quite similarly for both simulations. However, differences for other mechanisms still exist since greater surface precipitation amounts are simulated at 450&thinsp;m. It is found that the entrainment process, characterized by small eddies at the cloud edges, is strongly underestimated at 450&thinsp;m horizontal resolution, missing the mixing with the environmental air. Therefore, too rapid a development of deep convection is simulated at this horizontal resolution, associated with fast-track microphysical processes and enhanced dynamics. By contrast, at 150&thinsp;m horizontal resolution, the updraught cores are mainly resolved, as are the subsiding shell, while subgrid eddies, produced by dynamical processes, are localized at the cloud interior edges, better representing the entrainment process.</p><p>Furthermore, this first LES of a real Mediterranean precipitating case study highlights a convective organization with very fine-scale features within the converging low-level flow, features that are definitively out of range of models with kilometric horizontal resolutions.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Barthlott and Davolio(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Barthlott, C. and Davolio, S.: Mechanisms initiating heavy precipitation over
Italy during HyMeX Special Observation Period 1: a numerical case study using
two mesoscale models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
142, 238–258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2630" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2630</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Barthlott et al.(2016)Barthlott, Adler, Kalthoff, Handwerker, Kohler,
and Wieser</label><mixed-citation>
Barthlott, C., Adler, B., Kalthoff, N., Handwerker, J., Kohler, M., and Wieser,
A.: The role of Corsica in initiating nocturnal offshore convection,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 222–237,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2415" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2415</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bougeault and Lacarrère(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Bougeault, P. and Lacarrère, P.: Parameterization of orography-induced
turbulence in a meso-beta-scale model, Mon. Weather Rev., 123, 1560–1573,
1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bryan et al.(2003)Bryan, Wyngaard, and Fritsch</label><mixed-citation>
Bryan, G. H., Wyngaard, J. C., and Fritsch, J. M.: Resolution Requirements for
the Simulation of Deep Moist Convection, Mon. Weather Rev., 131,
2394–2416, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131&lt;2394:RRFTSO&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131&lt;2394:RRFTSO&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Buzzi et al.(2014)Buzzi, Davolio, Malguzzi, Drofa, and
Mastrangelo</label><mixed-citation>
Buzzi, A., Davolio, S., Malguzzi, P., Drofa, O., and Mastrangelo, D.: Heavy rainfall episodes over Liguria in autumn 2011: numerical forecasting experiments, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1325–1340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1325-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1325-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Caniaux et al.(1994)Caniaux, Redelsperger, and Lafore</label><mixed-citation>
Caniaux, G., Redelsperger, J.-L., and Lafore, J.-P.: A numerical study of the
stratiform region of a fast-moving squall line. 1. general description and
water and heat budgets., J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2046–2074, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Colella and Woodward(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Colella, P. and Woodward, P. R.: The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for
gas-dynamical simulations, Journal of Computational Physics, 54, 174–201,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(84)90143-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(84)90143-8</a>,
1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Cuxart et al.(2000)Cuxart, Bougeault, and Redelsperger</label><mixed-citation>
Cuxart, J., Bougeault, P., and Redelsperger, J.-L.: A turbulence scheme
allowing for mesoscale and large-eddy simulations., Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 1–30, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Dauhut et al.(2015)Dauhut, Chaboureau, Escobar, and
Mascart</label><mixed-citation>
Dauhut, T., Chaboureau, J.-P., Escobar, J., and Mascart, P.: Large-eddy
simulations of Hector the convector making the stratosphere wetter,
Atmospheric Science Letters, 16, 135–140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/asl2.534" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/asl2.534</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Dauhut et al.(2016)Dauhut, Chaboureau, Escobar, and
Mascart</label><mixed-citation>
Dauhut, T., Chaboureau, J.-P., Escobar, J., and Mascart, P.: Giga-LES of Hector
the Convector and Its Two Tallest Updrafts up to the Stratosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 5041–5060, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0083.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0083.1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Davolio et al.(2016)Davolio, Volonté, Manzato, Pucillo, Cicogna, and
Ferrario</label><mixed-citation>
Davolio, S., Volonté, A., Manzato, A., Pucillo, A., Cicogna, A., and Ferrario,
M. E.: Mechanisms producing different precipitation patterns over
north-eastern Italy: insights from HyMeX-SOP1 and previous events, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 188–205,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2731" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2731</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Deardorff(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
Deardorff, J. W.: Numerical Investigation of Neutral and Unstable Planetary
Boundary Layers, J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 91–115,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029&lt;0091:NIONAU&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029&lt;0091:NIONAU&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Ducrocq et al.(2008)Ducrocq, Nuissier, Ricard, Lebeaupin, and
Thouvenin</label><mixed-citation>
Ducrocq, V., Nuissier, O., Ricard, D., Lebeaupin, C., and Thouvenin, T.: A
numerical study of three catastrophic precipitatating events over southern
France. II: Mesoscale triggering and stationarity factors, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 134, 131–145, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Ducrocq et al.(2014)Ducrocq, Braud, Davolio, Ferretti, Flamant,
Jansa, Kalthoff, Richard, Taupier-Letage, Ayral, Belamari, Berne, Borga,
Boudevillain, Bock, Boichard, Bouin, Bousquet, Bouvier, Chiggiato, Cimini,
Corsmeier, Coppola, Cocquerez, Defer, Delanoë, Di Girolamo, Doerenbecher,
Drobinski, Dufournet, Fourrié, Gourley, Labatut, Lambert, Le Coz, Marzano,
Molinié, Montani, Nord, Nuret, Ramage, Rison, Roussot, Said, Schwarzenboeck,
Testor, Van Baelen, Vincendon, Aran, and Tamayo</label><mixed-citation>
Ducrocq, V., Braud, I., Davolio, S., Ferretti, R., Flamant, C., Jansa, A.,
Kalthoff, N., Richard, E., Taupier-Letage, I., Ayral, P.-A., Belamari, S.,
Berne, A., Borga, M., Boudevillain, B., Bock, O., Boichard, J.-L., Bouin,
M.-N., Bousquet, O., Bouvier, C., Chiggiato, J., Cimini, D., Corsmeier, U.,
Coppola, L., Cocquerez, P., Defer, E., Delanoë, J., Di Girolamo, P.,
Doerenbecher, A., Drobinski, P., Dufournet, Y., Fourrié, N., Gourley, J.,
Labatut, L., Lambert, D., Le Coz, J., Marzano, F., Molinié, G., Montani, A.,
Nord, G., Nuret, M., Ramage, K., Rison, W., Roussot, O., Said, F.,
Schwarzenboeck, A., Testor, P., Van Baelen, J., Vincendon, B., Aran, M., and
Tamayo, J.: HyMeX-SOP1: The Field Campaign Dedicated to Heavy Precipitation
and Flash Flooding in the Northwestern Mediterranean, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 1083–1100, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Ducrocq et al.(2016)Ducrocq, Davolio, Ferretti, Flamant, Santaner,
Kalthoff, Richard, and Wernli</label><mixed-citation>
Ducrocq, V., Davolio, S., Ferretti, R., Flamant, C., Santaner, V. H., Kalthoff,
N., Richard, E., and Wernli, H.: Introduction to the HyMeX Special Issue on
‘Advances in understanding and forecasting of heavy precipitation in the
Mediterranean through the HyMeX SOP1 field campaign’, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 1–6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2856" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2856</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Duffourg et al.(2016)Duffourg, Nuissier, Ducrocq, Olivier Bock,
Chazette, Delanoë, Doerenbecher, Flamant, Fourrié, di Girolamo, Lac,
Martinet, and Said</label><mixed-citation>
Duffourg, F., Nuissier, O., Ducrocq, V., Olivier Bock, O., Chazette, P.,
Delanoë, J., Doerenbecher, A., Flamant, C., Fourrié, N., di Girolamo, P.,
Lac, C., Martinet, M., and Said, F.: Offshore deep convection initiation and
maintenmain during HyMeX IOP 16a heavy precipitation event, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol.
Soc., 142, 259–274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2725" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2725</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Duffourg et al.(2018)Duffourg, Lee, Ducrocq, Flamant, Chazette, and
Di Girolamo</label><mixed-citation>
Duffourg, F., Lee, K.-O., Ducrocq, V., Flamant, C., Chazette, P., and
Di Girolamo, P.: Role of moisture patterns in the backbuilding formation of
HyMeX IOP13 heavy precipitation systems, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 291–303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3201</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Fiori et al.(2017)Fiori, Ferraris, Molini, Siccardi, Kranzlmueller,
and Parodi</label><mixed-citation>
Fiori, E., Ferraris, L., Molini, L., Siccardi, F., Kranzlmueller, D., and
Parodi, A.: Triggering and evolution of a deep convective system in the
Mediterranean Sea: modelling and observations at a very fine scale, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 927–941, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Fourrié et al.(2015)Fourrié, Bresson, Nuret, Jany, Brousseau,
Doerenbecher, Kreitz, Nuissier, Sevault, Bénichou, Amodei, and
Pouponneau</label><mixed-citation>
Fourrié, N., Bresson, É., Nuret, M., Jany, C., Brousseau, P., Doerenbecher, A., Kreitz, M., Nuissier, O., Sevault, E., Bénichou, H., Amodei, M., and Pouponneau, F.: AROME-WMED, a real-time mesoscale model designed for the HyMeX special observation periods, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1919–1941, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1919-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1919-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Fourrié et al.(2019)Fourrié, Nuret, Brousseau, Caumont,
Doerenbecher, Wattrelot, Moll, Bénichou, Puech, Bock, Bosser, Chazette,
Flamant, Di Girolamo, Richard, and Saïd</label><mixed-citation>
Fourrié, N., Nuret, M., Brousseau, P., Caumont, O., Doerenbecher, A., Wattrelot, E., Moll, P., Bénichou, H., Puech, D., Bock, O., Bosser, P., Chazette, P., Flamant, C., Di Girolamo, P., Richard, E., and Saïd, F.: The AROME-WMED reanalyses of the first special observation period of the Hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean experiment (HyMeX), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2657–2678, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2657-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2657-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Gal-Chen and Somerville(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Gal-Chen, T. and Somerville, R. C. J.: On the use of a coordinate
transformation for the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations, J. Comput.
Phys., 17, 209–228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(75)90037-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(75)90037-6</a>, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Glenn and Krueger(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Glenn, I. B. and Krueger, S. K.: Downdrafts in the near cloud environment of
deep convective updrafts, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 6,
1–8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000261" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000261</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Hanley et al.(2015)Hanley, Plant, Stein, Hogan, Nicol, Lean,
Halliwell, and Clark</label><mixed-citation>
Hanley, K. E., Plant, R. S., Stein, T. H. M., Hogan, R. J., Nicol, J. C., Lean,
H. W., Halliwell, C., and Clark, P. A.: Mixing-length controls on
high-resolution simulations of convective storms, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 272–284,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2356</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Heath et al.(2017)Heath, Fuelberg, Tanelli, Turk, Lawson, Woods, and
Freeman</label><mixed-citation>
Heath, N. K., Fuelberg, H. E., Tanelli, S., Turk, F. J., Lawson, R. P., Woods,
S., and Freeman, S.: WRF nested large-eddy simulations of deep convection
during SEAC4RS, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,
3953–3974, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025465" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025465</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Heus et al.(2009)Heus, J. Pols, J. Jonker, A. Van den Akker, and
H. Lenschow</label><mixed-citation>
Heus, T., J. Pols, C. F., J. Jonker, H. J., A. Van den Akker, H. E., and
H. Lenschow, D.: Observational validation of the compensating mass flux
through the shell around cumulus clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 101–112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.358" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.358</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Honnert et al.(2011)Honnert, Masson, and Couvreux</label><mixed-citation>
Honnert, R., Masson, V., and Couvreux, F.: A Diagnostic for Evaluating the
Representation of Turbulence in Atmospheric Models at the Kilometric Scale,
J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 3112–3131,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-061.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-061.1</a>,  2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Jansa et al.(2001)Jansa, Genoves, Angeles Picornell, Campins,
Riosalido, and Carretero</label><mixed-citation>
Jansa, A., Genoves, A., Angeles Picornell, M., Campins, J., Riosalido, R., and
Carretero, O.: Western Mediterranean cyclones and heavy rain. Part 2:
Statistical approach, Meteorol. Appl., 8, 43–56, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Khairoutdinov et al.(2009)Khairoutdinov, Krueger, Moeng, Bogenschutz,
and Randall</label><mixed-citation>
Khairoutdinov, M. F., Krueger, S. K., Moeng, C.-H., Bogenschutz, P. A., and
Randall, D. A.: Large-Eddy Simulation of Maritime Deep Tropical Convection,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 1, 15,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.15" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.15</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Lac et al.(2018)Lac, Chaboureau, Masson, Pinty, Tulet, Escobar,
Leriche, Barthe, Aouizerats, Augros, Aumond, Auguste, Bechtold, Berthet,
Bielli, Bosseur, Caumont, Cohard, Colin, Couvreux, Cuxart, Delautier, Dauhut,
Ducrocq, Filippi, Gazen, Geoffroy, Gheusi, Honnert, Lafore, Brossier, Libois,
Lunet, Mari, Maric, Mascart, Mogé, Molinié, Nuissier, Pantillon, Peyrillé,
Pergaud, Perraud, Pianezze, Redelsperger, Ricard, Richard, Riette, Rodier,
Schoetter, Seyfried, Stein, Suhre, Taufour, Thouron, Turner, Verrelle, Vié,
Visentin, Vionnet, and Wautelet</label><mixed-citation>
Lac, C., Chaboureau, J.-P., Masson, V., Pinty, J.-P., Tulet, P., Escobar, J., Leriche, M., Barthe, C., Aouizerats, B., Augros, C., Aumond, P., Auguste, F., Bechtold, P., Berthet, S., Bielli, S., Bosseur, F., Caumont, O., Cohard, J.-M., Colin, J., Couvreux, F., Cuxart, J., Delautier, G., Dauhut, T., Ducrocq, V., Filippi, J.-B., Gazen, D., Geoffroy, O., Gheusi, F., Honnert, R., Lafore, J.-P., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Libois, Q., Lunet, T., Mari, C., Maric, T., Mascart, P., Mogé, M., Molinié, G., Nuissier, O., Pantillon, F., Peyrillé, P., Pergaud, J., Perraud, E., Pianezze, J., Redelsperger, J.-L., Ricard, D., Richard, E., Riette, S., Rodier, Q., Schoetter, R., Seyfried, L., Stein, J., Suhre, K., Taufour, M., Thouron, O., Turner, S., Verrelle, A., Vié, B., Visentin, F., Vionnet, V., and Wautelet, P.: Overview of the Meso-NH model version 5.4 and its applications, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1929–1969, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1929-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1929-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Lunet et al.(2017)Lunet, Lac, Auguste, Visentin, Masson, and
Escobar</label><mixed-citation>
Lunet, T., Lac, C., Auguste, F., Visentin, F., Masson, V., and Escobar, J.:
Combination of WENO and Explicit Runge–Kutta Methods for Wind Transport in
the Meso-NH Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 3817–3838,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0343.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0343.1</a>,  2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Machado and Chaboureau(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Machado, L. A. T. and Chaboureau, J.-P.: Effect of Turbulence Parameterization
on Assessment of Cloud Organization, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 3246–3262, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Martinet et al.(2017)Martinet, Nuissier, Duffourg, Ducrocq, and
Ricard</label><mixed-citation>
Martinet, M., Nuissier, O., Duffourg, F., Ducrocq, V., and Ricard, D.:
Fine-scale numerical analysis of the sensitivity of the HyMeX IOP16a heavy
precipitating event to the turbulent mixing-length parametrization, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 3122–3135,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3167</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Masson et al.(2013)Masson, Le Moigne, Martin, Faroux, Alias, Alkama,
Belamari, Barbu, Boone, Bouyssel, Brousseau, Brun, Calvet, Carrer, Decharme,
Delire, Donier, Essaouini, Gibelin, Giordani, Habets, Jidane, Kerdraon,
Kourzeneva, Lafaysse, Lafont, Lebeaupin Brossier, Lemonsu, Mahfouf,
Marguinaud, Mokhtari, Morin, Pigeon, Salgado, Seity, Taillefer, Tanguy,
Tulet, Vincendon, Vionnet, and Voldoire</label><mixed-citation>
Masson, V., Le Moigne, P., Martin, E., Faroux, S., Alias, A., Alkama, R., Belamari, S., Barbu, A., Boone, A., Bouyssel, F., Brousseau, P., Brun, E., Calvet, J.-C., Carrer, D., Decharme, B., Delire, C., Donier, S., Essaouini, K., Gibelin, A.-L., Giordani, H., Habets, F., Jidane, M., Kerdraon, G., Kourzeneva, E., Lafaysse, M., Lafont, S., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Lemonsu, A., Mahfouf, J.-F., Marguinaud, P., Mokhtari, M., Morin, S., Pigeon, G., Salgado, R., Seity, Y., Taillefer, F., Tanguy, G., Tulet, P., Vincendon, B., Vionnet, V., and Voldoire, A.: The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 929–960, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Mlawer et al.(1997)Mlawer, Taubman, Brown, Iacono, and
Clough</label><mixed-citation>
Mlawer, E., Taubman, S., Brown, P., Iacono, M., and Clough, S.: Radiative
transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, A validated correlated-k model
for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16663–16682,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Nuissier(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Nuissier, O.: Time-lapse video of the Intense Observation Period (IOP) 16a case
study, SEDOO OMP, HyMeX database, <a href="https://doi.org/10.6096/mistrals-hymex.1540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6096/mistrals-hymex.1540</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Nuissier et al.(2008)Nuissier, Ducrocq, Ricard, Lebeaupin, and
Anquetin</label><mixed-citation>
Nuissier, O., Ducrocq, V., Ricard, D., Lebeaupin, C., and Anquetin, S.: A
numerical study of three catastrophic precipitating events over southern
France. I: Numerical framework and synoptic ingredients, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 134, 111–130, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Pergaud et al.(2009)Pergaud, Masson, and Malardel</label><mixed-citation>
Pergaud, J., Masson, V., and Malardel, S.: A parameterization of dry thermals
and shallow cumuli for mesoscale numerical weather prediction., Bound.-Layer
Meteor., 132, 83–106, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Petch(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Petch, J. C.: Sensitivity studies of developing convection in a cloud-resolving
model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 345–358,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.71" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.71</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Pinty and Jabouille(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Pinty, J.-P. and Jabouille, P.: A mixed-phase cloud parameterization for use in
mesoscale non-hydrostatic model: simulations of a squall line and of
orographic precipitations, in: Proc. Conf. of Cloud Physics, Everett, WA,
USA, 17–21 August 1998, 217–220, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Rainaud et al.(2017)Rainaud, Brossier, Ducrocq, and
Giordani</label><mixed-citation>
Rainaud, R., Brossier, C. L., Ducrocq, V., and Giordani, H.: High-resolution
air–sea coupling impact on two heavy precipitation events in the Western
Mediterranean, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143,
2448–2462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3098" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3098</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Scheffknecht et al.(2016)Scheffknecht, Richard, and
Lambert</label><mixed-citation>
Scheffknecht, P., Richard, E., and Lambert, D.: A highly localized
high-precipitation event over Corsica, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 206–221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2795" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2795</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Shu and Osher(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Shu, C.-W. and Osher, S.: Efficient implementation of essentially
non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, Journal of Computational Physics,
77, 439–471, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5</a>,
1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Stein et al.(2000)Stein, Richard, Lafore, Pinty, Asencio, and
Cosma</label><mixed-citation>
Stein, J., Richard, E., Lafore, J.-P., Pinty, J.-P., Asencio, N., and Cosma,
S.: High-resolution non-hydrostatic simulations of flash-flood episodes with
grid-nesting and ice phase, Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 72, 203–221, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Stein et al.(2015)Stein, Hogan, Clark, Halliwell, Hanley, Lean,
Nicol, and Plant</label><mixed-citation>
Stein, T. H. M., Hogan, R. J., Clark, P. A., Halliwell, C. E., Hanley, K. E.,
Lean, H. W., Nicol, J. C., and Plant, R. S.: The DYMECS Project: A
Statistical Approach for the Evaluation of Convective Storms in
High-Resolution NWP Models, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96,
939–951, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Strauss et al.(2019)Strauss, Ricard, Lac, and Verrelle</label><mixed-citation>
Strauss, C., Ricard, D., Lac, C., and Verrelle, A.: Evaluation of turbulence
parametrizations in convective clouds and their environment based on a
large-eddy simulation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
145, 3195–3217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3614" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3614</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Talbot et al.(2012)Talbot, Bou-Zeid, and Smith</label><mixed-citation>
Talbot, C., Bou-Zeid, E., and Smith, J.: Nested Mesoscale Large-Eddy
Simulations with WRF: Performance in Real Test Cases, Journal of
Hydrometeorology, 13, 1421–1441, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-048.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-048.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Thévenot et al.(2016)Thévenot, Bouin, Ducrocq, Lebeaupin Brossier,
Nuissier, Pianezze, and Duffourg</label><mixed-citation>
Thévenot, O., Bouin, M.-N., Ducrocq, V., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Nuissier, O.,
Pianezze, J., and Duffourg, F.: Influence of the sea state on Mediterranean
heavy precipitation: a case-study from HyMeX SOP1, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 377–389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2660" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2660</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Verrelle et al.(2015)Verrelle, Ricard, and Lac</label><mixed-citation>
Verrelle, A., Ricard, D., and Lac, C.: Sensitivity of high‐resolution
idealized simulations of thunderstorms to horizontal resolution and
turbulence parametrization, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141,  433–448, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2363" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2363</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Verrelle et al.(2017)Verrelle, Ricard, and Lac</label><mixed-citation>
Verrelle, A., Ricard, D., and Lac, C.: Evaluation and Improvement of Turbulence
Parameterization inside Deep Convective Clouds at Kilometer-Scale Resolution,
Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 3947–3967, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0404.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0404.1</a>,
2017.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Wyngaard(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Wyngaard, J. C.: Toward Numerical Modeling in the “Terra Incognita”,
J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1816–1826,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;1816:TNMITT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;1816:TNMITT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Zängl et al.(2015)Zängl, Reinert, Rípodas, and Baldauf</label><mixed-citation>
Zängl, G., Reinert, D., Rípodas, P., and Baldauf, M.: The ICON (ICOsahedral
Non-hydrostatic) modelling framework of DWD and MPI-M: Description of the
non-hydrostatic dynamical core, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 563–579, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2378" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2378</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
