<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-20-14473-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Quantifying bioaerosol concentrations in dust clouds through online UV-LIF
and mass spectrometry measurements at the <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory</article-title><alt-title>Bioaerosols in dust clouds</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Bioaerosols in dust clouds}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{D.~Morrison et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Morrison</surname><given-names>Douglas</given-names></name>
          <email>douglas.morrison@manchester.ac.uk</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Crawford</surname><given-names>Ian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4433-7310</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Marsden</surname><given-names>Nicholas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6242-929X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Flynn</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Read</surname><given-names>Katie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Neves</surname><given-names>Luis</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Foot</surname><given-names>Virginia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Kaye</surname><given-names>Paul</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6950-4870</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Stanley</surname><given-names>Warren</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Coe</surname><given-names>Hugh</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3264-1713</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Topping</surname><given-names>David</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8247-9649</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gallagher</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4968-6088</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of
Manchester, Brunswick St, Manchester, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratory, University of York, York, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Science and Technology Research Institute, University of
Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Salisbury, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Douglas Morrison
(douglas.morrison@manchester.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>November</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>14473</fpage><lpage>14490</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>18</day><month>February</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>March</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>September</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e203">Observations of the long-range transport of biological
particles in the tropics via dust vectors are now seen as fundamental to
the understanding of many global atmosphere–ocean biogeochemical cycles,
changes in air quality, human health, ecosystem impacts, and climate.
However, there is a lack of long-term measurements quantifying their
presence in such conditions. Here, we present annual observations of
bioaerosol concentrations based on online ultraviolet laser-induced
fluorescence (UV-LIF) spectrometry from the  World Meteorological
Organization – Global Atmospheric Watch (WMO-GAW)
Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory on São Vicente. We observe
the expected strong seasonal changes in absolute concentrations of
bioaerosols with significant enhancements during winter due to the strong
island inflow of air mass, originating from the African continent.
Monthly median bioaerosol concentrations as high as 45 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were
found with 95th percentile values exceeding 130 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during strong
dust events. However, in contrast, the relative fraction of
bioaerosol numbers compared to total dust number concentration
shows little seasonal variation. Mean bioaerosol
contributions accounted for 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 % of total coarse aerosol
concentrations, only rarely exceeding 1 % during particularly strong
events under appropriate conditions. Although enhancements in the median
bioaerosol fraction do occur in winter, they also occur at other times of
the year, likely due to the enhanced Aeolian activity driving dust events at
this time from different sources. We hypothesise that this indicates the
relative contribution of bioaerosol material in dust transported across
the tropical Atlantic throughout the year is relatively uniform, comprised
mainly of mixtures of dust and bacteria and/or bacterial fragments. We
argue that this hypothesis is supported from analysis of measurements also
at Cabo Verde just prior to the long-term monitoring experiment where UV-LIF
single particle measurements were compared with laser ablation aerosol
particle time-of-flight mass spectrometer (LAAP-ToF) measurements. These
clearly show a very high correlation between particles with mixed
biosilicate mass spectral signatures and UV-LIF biofluorescent signatures
suggesting the bioaerosol concentrations are dominated by these mixtures.
These observations should assist with constraining bioaerosol concentrations for tropical global
climate model (GCM) simulations. Note that here we use the term “bioaerosol” to
include mixtures of dust and bacterial material.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e246">Aerosols play a key role in the global climate. Their suspension in the air
can scatter incoming solar radiation, reducing the warming effect of the
Sun. Rather than scatter light directly, aerosols can also serve as nuclei
for cloud droplets, ice crystals and precipitation. This can promote<?pagebreak page14474?> further changes in the climate, with cloud
cover increasing local albedo effects. Although most cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN) are inorganic, there has been increasing evidence to suggest
that biological particles play an important role too. This is because
despite existing in relatively low concentrations, bioaerosols are more
effective CCN than alternative particle types. Bacteria such as <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> are thought
to promote rainfall (Sands et al., 1982), while strains such as
<italic>Erwinia carotovora carotovora</italic> and <italic>Erwinia carotovora atroseptica</italic> have
been shown to be CCN active, with 25 %–30 % activable at supersaturations larger than 1 % (Franc and
DeMott, 1998). Bauer et al. (2003) collected cultivable bacteria from
cloud water samples in Austria and found all samples to be activable at
supersaturations where insoluble wettable particles of comparable size would
not have been. Other biogenic aerosols such as pollen have also been shown
to have CCN properties (Pope, 2010). This is also true for fragmented pollen
grains, significantly raising the number of potential activation sites
(Steiner et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e258">Homogeneous ice nucleation occurs in liquid particles at temperatures of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and below. However, heterogeneous ice nucleation can occur at
significantly warmer temperatures, with ice nuclei (IN) reducing the energy
required for crystallisation to begin. The effectiveness of IN in this
regard depends on their composition, size, surface area and more (Hoose and
Möhler, 2012). They also encompass a broad range of particles, including
mineral dust, metals, soot, and biological particles. Of these particle types, mineral dust has been one of the most closely
investigated, with multiple studies observing a range of conditions at
which it can act as effective nuclei. Over the dust belt as outlined by Liu
et al. (2008), Zhang et al. (2012) found dust to initiate freezing in
midlevel supercooled stratiform clouds (MSSCs) at temperatures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
and below. This is warmer than findings from Ansmann et al. (2008),
who did not find evidence of ice formation in supercooled stratiform clouds
with cloud-top temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, but colder than
findings by Sassen et al. (2003), who attributed African dust to the glaciation of altocumulus clouds at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
      <p id="d1e338">More recent focus has been placed on biological particles, with many
identified as more efficient IN. For example, strains of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> have been found to
initiate freezing at temperatures as high as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Yankofsky et al.,
1981). They are also capable of influencing clouds across a range of
altitudes, with fungal spores as large as 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m reaching altitudes of
30 km in a matter of days (Haga et al., 2013). Dispute over bioaerosol's
contributions to these meteorological processes focus on their low
concentrations, with bioaerosols often accounting for less than 1 % of
total particle concentrations. Some estimates are even lower, with Bauer et
al. (2002) finding bacterial average mass concentrations accounted for just
0.01 % of organic carbon (OC) in cloud water and precipitation samples.
However, in pristine environments, bioaerosol concentrations can be significantly
amplified. For example, bioaerosols have been shown to account
for 46 % of total coarse aerosol mass concentration in the central Amazon
rainforest (Huffman et al., 2012). In these instances, it is thought that
bioaerosols are part of a self-sustaining cycle, promoting rainfall that in
turn drives vegetative growth (Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al., 2016).
Furthermore, Pratt et al. (2009) identified 33 % of the ice crystal
residual particles sampled in a wave cloud over Wyoming as biogenic.</p>
      <p id="d1e371">Bioaerosols are also capable of global dispersion (McTainsh, 1996). This is
because although some are freely suspended in the air, others can utilise
mineral dust to act as a vector for their transport. It is perhaps because
of this that dust clouds often contain significant concentrations of
micro-organisms (Griffin et al., 2001). Furthermore, Yamaguchi et al. (2012)
investigated the bacteria's ability to grow and reproduce when attached to
dust and found many to remain physiologically active. This can have important implications for cloud formation but also ecological
and health impacts too. Asian dust particles and their corresponding
microbial concentrations have been found to positively correlate with levels
of ice nucleation in snow samples atop Tateyama (Maki et al., 2018).
Meanwhile, there is a known association between dust storms and meningitis.
Outbreaks often occur in the Sahelian region of northern Africa between
February and May, affecting as many as 200 000 individuals annually
(Sultan et al., 2005). During this period, conditions are usually dry and
dust storms are frequent. Meningitis outbreaks persist up until the wet season begins, when dust events cease
(Molesworth et al., 2003).</p>
      <p id="d1e375">Trade winds are an important aspect of Aeolian events in Africa, with the
point of their convergence known as the Intertropical Convergence Zone
(ITCZ). Within this zone, air is made to rise, forming the ascending part of
the Hadley cell. The ITCZ is also subject to latitudinal movement, following
the progression of the annual solar maximum (Folland et al., 1991). This
results in a cycle of atmospheric loading, with dust readily taken to high
altitudes during summer. This material is consequently often transported
significant distances across the Atlantic, where it is deposited in the
ocean along the way. As such, trade winds and dust events can act as major
contributors for nutrient deposition. Although the chemical content of what
is deposited depends on the source of the dust, most dust particles
originate from arid or semi-arid regions and contain large amounts of
biogeochemically significant elements. The role of organic components in
affecting ocean life is coming under increased scrutiny.</p>
      <p id="d1e378">For example, the decline in Caribbean coral reefs has been partially
attributed to transatlantic dust events (Rypien, 2008). <italic>Aspergillus sydowii</italic> is a fungal spore
implicated in a Caribbean-wide sea-fan disease that has been cultured from
Caribbean air samples. It is believed that dust is acting as a substrate for
said spores. With Yamaguchi et al. (2012) having analysed the bacterial
community structure for Asian dust particles, it was found that more than 20
bacterial classes were present, with <italic>Actinobacteria</italic>, <italic>Bacilli</italic>
and <italic>Sphingobacteria</italic> dominating. These findings are
similar to previous<?pagebreak page14475?> studies on African dust (Griffin et al., 2001), suggesting that the diversity of such communities is
largely similar across arid regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e393">Research has shown how bioaerosols can influence the world around them and
has also observed their presence during dust events. However, their
concentrations have not been readily quantified in such conditions. This
study aimed to capture long-term trends in bioaerosol concentrations within
a region of the world where dust events are both common and pronounced.</p>
      <p id="d1e396">To do this, online measurements using a wideband integrated bioaerosol
sensor (WIBS-4M) were taken for 11 months off the west coast of continental Africa. This was preceded by an intensive
campaign that paired another ultraviolet laser-induced fluorescence (UV-LIF)
spectrometer known as a WIBS-4A (e.g. Gabey et al., 2010; Savage et al., 2017),
with a laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight mass spectrometer
(LAAP-ToF-MS) (Marsden et al., 2018). The latter was used to provide detailed
contemporary particle composition analysis and to identify biosilicate
particle classes. This biosilicate classification was then used to validate
the WIBS-4A biofluorescent classification schemes, e.g. Ruske
et al. (2017), to subsequently interpret the long-term ambient datasets
collected by a WIBS-4M at the CVAO site. With an estimated 50 % of global
annual dust originating from northern Africa (Engelstaedter et al., 2006), the
African continent is a high-priority region that is often overlooked for
such studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Site and long-term sampling details</title>
      <p id="d1e414">From September 2015 to August 2016, a WIBS-4M was continuously sampling at
the Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory (CVAO), off the west coast of continental
Africa (16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>52<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>02<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W). The observatory is
located 50 m from the coastline and is subject to persistent
northeasterly trade winds. During this period, the observatory recorded a
mean temperature of 23.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and median wind speeds of 6.2 ms<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are similar to the long-term trends reported by
Carpenter et al. (2010). Given the placement of the observatory on the island, as well as the lack
of major coastal features, this site is well suited for observations of
unpolluted marine air. Air was drawn vertically down a 10 m stainless steel
pipe with an inner diameter of 1 in at a rate of 16.7 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, from
which an isokinetic inlet was used to draw a subsample of air at a rate of
0.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The sample line was heated to minimise condensation
build up, and a Thermo PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inlet was used at the top of the pipe.
Meteorological data were recorded atop a 30 m tower located at the
observatory, with dominant wind direction recorded as one of 16 compass points. This was funded as part of the Ice in
Cloud Experiment – Dust (ICE-D) campaign, which had the aim of taking
measurements of Saharan dust concentrations to better understand
aerosol–cloud interactions and reduce uncertainty in numerical models.
Details of the ICE-D surface experiments and accompanying aircraft sampling
campaigns are described by Liu et al. (2018). The WIBS-4M was used to
observe long-term trends in bioaerosol concentrations and was regularly
calibrated using National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
calibration polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>Intensive campaign and dust samples</title>
      <p id="d1e539">The monitoring component of the project was prefaced by a shorter-term but
highly intensive campaign, the results from which are used to inform the
interpretation of the long-term data. During the shorter campaign, a WIBS-4A
was used alongside a LAAP-ToF (Marsden et al., 2018). Ground-based measurements using the
LAAP-ToF and WIBS-4A were conducted over a 20 d period in August 2015
located near Praia International Airport, Cabo Verde
(14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>570<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>290<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W; 100 m a.s.l.).
A full description of the site and experimental setup is provided by
Liu et al. (2018) and Marsden et al. (2019), but a brief summary
is now given. Ground-based ambient aerosol measurements were made by the LAAP-ToF and WIBS-4A which were installed in the
mobile Manchester Aerosol Laboratory, located 1500 m from the airport.
Aerosols were sampled via a pumped inlet mounted on a 10 m tower. The total
flow down the inlet was 1000 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a series of aerosol
instruments subsampled isokinetically downstream of a common manifold,
which subsampled at 186 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from the main inlet. The inlet
characterisation and losses are described in Liu et al. (2018) and
in the associated references. The LAAP-ToF measured aerosol in the
size range of 0.5–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, whilst the WIBS-4A measured
particles in the size range of 0.5–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m; however, the nominal
cut-off of the inlet system was approximately 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. When considering
size measurements, it should be noted that the LAAP-ToF measures a
particle's vacuum aerodynamic diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>va</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while the WIBS-4A measures
a particle's optical diameter (D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). A more detailed description of the
WIBS and LAAP-ToF instruments is provided in Sect. 2.2. The sampling tower
was located upwind of the main airport terminal and the city of
Praia (400 m and 2.5 km, respectively) in the prevailing northeasterly
winds so potential contamination sources were minimal. A full analysis and
classification of the back-trajectory wind fields during this intensive
experiment period was performed by Liu et al. (2018). They reported that
dust plumes from the Sahara and Sub-Saharan Africa were more frequently
observed after a synoptic shift on 15 August, when winds became more
easterly. They also noted that more efficient transport of dust via stronger
easterly winds led to larger advected dust loadings with shorter dust
transport times. These different dust advection pathways were reflected in different size and compositions of<?pagebreak page14476?> mineral
dust recorded by the LAAP-ToF during the intensive experiment (Marsden et
al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e647">Calibration of the LAAP-ToF was performed with pure hematite samples (Liu et
al., 2018), whilst both the WIBS-4A and WIBS-4M were calibrated using NIST
latex calibration beads and fluorescent glass beads, e.g. Crawford et
al. (2015). It should be emphasised here that the WIBS-4A and 4M are almost identical
instruments, with the only differences being the trigger levels and flow
rates used. A detailed description of the WIBS-4A can be found in Savage
et al. (2017) and of the WIBS-4M in Forde et al. (2019). As such, the fluorescence data
for each instrument are comparable, although we acknowledge there can be
issues even when comparing measurements from two identical models. An
intercomparison of the fluorescent responses between instruments when
using the NIST calibration particles help affirm the instrument's
similarities. This is the same methodology as has been described by
Forde et al. (2019), Savage et al. (2017) and Crawford
et al. (2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e650">In addition, subsequent to the ambient experiments, Moroccan dust samples,
hereby referred to as Moroccan dust, were provided that were collected in
the M'Hamid region (29<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>43<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), which is
thought to be representative of the dust material often observed in the
continental outflow sampled here. These samples were dispersed through the
WIBS-4M in a controlled laboratory experiment alongside additional collected
samples of illite. Subsets of these samples were gamma irradiated to
remove potential storage and transport contaminants. The UV-LIF response of
the pure and irradiated samples were intercompared and are described in the
results section. Their respective fluorescent properties, as well as size
and shape factors were also compared to the intensive and long-term ambient
observations. The negative ion spectra of the pure samples were also
analysed using the LAAP-ToF in the laboratory for comparison. These sample
properties were used to help contextualise the campaign results and the classification scheme used to identify
biosilicate particle concentrations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Instrumentation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>WIBS</title>
      <p id="d1e730">Recent developments in UV-LIF technology have allowed real-time detection
of bioaerosols, whereby spectral patterns correlate with specific particle
characteristics (Huffman et al., 2019). This technology utilises the
intrinsic fluorescent properties found within organic molecules, including
proteins, co-enzymes, cell wall compounds and certain pigments to
differentiate between biological and non-biological particles. Each organic
molecule has its own fluorescent emissions that are dependent on the
incoming wavelength of the light that excites it. As such, it is possible
for UV-LIF technology to discriminate between organic molecules and help to identify the types of aerosols being
observed. The WIBS-4M is a three-channel UV-LIF spectrometer that uses Xenon
flash lamps to excite particles with either 280 nm (Xe1) or 370 nm (Xe2)
light. The resulting emissions from excited fluorophores are then recorded
by one of the instrument's two detection channels (De1 and  De2), creating a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> matrix. However, with the Xe1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> De1 channel becoming supersaturated from
elastically scattered UV light, only the other three resulting channels are
considered. These are called Fl 1, 2 and 3, and are the product of Xe1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> De2,
Xe2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> De1 and Xe2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> De2, respectively. De1 is sensitive to 310–400 nm UV light, while De2 covers a
broader range from 420 to 650 nm.</p>
      <p id="d1e773">Common fluorophores considered in particle analysis include the amino acid
tryptophan, the co-enzyme NAD(P)H and the vitamin riboflavin. Each
fluorophore excites at 280 nm, 270–400 and 450 nm, respectively, and
fluoresces at 300–400, 400–600 and 520–565 nm (Hill et al., 2009),
(Lakowicz, 2013). The specificity of a biological compound's fluorescent
properties enables particles to be classified into one of seven types,
depending on whether they exhibit fluorescence in one, two or three
channels (Perring et al., 2015). Particle shape and symmetry is also
measured through the use of a 635 nm diode laser that is initially involved
in triggering the Xenon flash lamps to fire. The forward scattering light
from a particle that passes through the laser hits a quadrant scattering
detector. By applying a Mie scattering model, the distribution of the light
on each quadrant can be used to estimate diameter, as well as an asymmetry
factor between 0 and 100 (Gabey et al., 2010). This has been discussed in detail by Kaye et al. (2007), with values of 0
representing perfectly spherical particles and higher asymmetry factors
describing more fibrous and linear shapes. When applying this range in the
context of our observations, asymmetry factor (AF) values of 10–20 reflect fairly spherical
particles, with values of 30 or more beginning to represent ellipsoidal
shapes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>LAAP-ToF</title>
      <p id="d1e784">In single particle mass spectrometry (SPMS), an online measurement of
aerodynamic size and composition is obtained with high temporal resolution. Several instrument designs have been described
(Murphy, 2007), but a typical instrument features an aerodynamic lens inlet
for particle beam creation and a high-powered UV pulsed laser for laser
desorption ionisation (LDI) of single particles arriving in the ion source.
Particle composition is analysed by time-of-flight mass spectrometry
(ToF-MS).</p>
      <p id="d1e787">Optical particle detection is used for the effective temporal alignment of the UV laser pulse with the arrival of a particle in the LDI source
region, and the determination of aerodynamic particle diameter by laser velocimetry.</p>
      <p id="d1e790">The LAAP-ToF instrument (AeroMegt GmbH) used for this study featured a
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerodynamic lens and continuous wave (CW) fibre-coupled optical detection lasers at 532 nm, and LDI was
performed by an argon fluoride (ArF) excimer<?pagebreak page14477?> laser (model EX5, GAM Laser Inc.), set to deliver
3–5 mJ per pulse of 193 nm radiation. Bipolar ToF-MS (TofWerks AG) was
implemented for compositional analysis of positive and negative ions. As a
technique, SPMS is considered qualitative or semi-quantitative. The ablation
and ionisation process of particles is incomplete so that competitive
ionisation and charge transfer in the vapour plume results in a strong
matrix effect (Reinard and Johnston, 2008). In addition, the reported
particle number concentration is affected by optical particle detection efficiency and the frequency of particles
“missed” by the pulsed UV laser. A full description of how these issues
affected the instrument performance in this study can be found in Marsden et
al. (2016), which estimates that the instrument was obtaining composition
for 1 % of dust particles in the size range of 0.5–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m.</p>
      <p id="d1e810">Despite the limitations in quantitative analysis, the SPMS has proven useful
for the online identification of particle composition types, internal mixing state and their temporal trends in terms of
particle number concentrations (Pratt and Prather, 2012). This typically
proceeds using cluster analysis to differentiate particles classes and peak
marker analysis to track changes in internal mixing state. In recent work,
Shen et al. (2018) demonstrated the capability of the LAAP-ToF instrument to
differentiate particle composition in a continental environment by a
combination of cluster analysis and peak marker analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Data analysis methods</title>
      <p id="d1e822">A 9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold was applied when setting fluorescent baselines for each
WIBS model to remove weakly fluorescent inorganic particles that could
otherwise act as interferents. This is a substantial increase in the
threshold used from previously published work but has been shown to
significantly reduce the interference from mineral dust while maintaining
the concentration of biological content (Savage et al., 2017). As such,
all fluorescent particles observed should contain significant amounts of
biological material and are subsequently considered to be a
bioaerosol. It should be noted that these are not likely to all be single
particles but could instead be agglomerates, including biological particles
attached to non-biological ones. The minimum cut-off diameter at 50 %
detection efficiency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p50</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for this particular WIBS-4M is 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m.
As such, only particles between 0.8 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m have been
included in the analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e859">Agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using Ward
linkage with Euclidean distance for the fluorescent particles, using the
method described in Crawford et al. (2015). This has been successfully
tested in the past when applying a controlled set of fluorescent PSL spheres through the same instrument model (Crawford et al.,
2015; Robinson et al., 2013) and has also been shown to accurately
capture bioaerosol mixtures within a semi-arid forest (Gosselin et al.,
2016). This process begins with individual data points being treated as
their own cluster, which are sequentially combined into larger clusters
based on the “distance” between data point values. Ward
linkage identifies which pair of clusters would yield the minimum increase
in total within-cluster variance after merging and consequently merges them
next. A Calinski–Harabasz score is then calculated, suggesting an optimum
number of clusters. This cluster analysis was performed separately for both
the WIBS-4A and WIBS-4M datasets. The transmission efficiency of the inlet
as a function of size has also been accounted when considering size
distributions for particles up to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Inlet
penetration as a function of size has also been considered based on the
Andersen 321A PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inlet (McFarland, 1984).</p>
      <p id="d1e879">Analysis of the LAAP-ToF data acquired during the ICE-D intensive campaign
has been presented by Marsden et al. (2019), in which the mineralogy and
mixing state of north African dust transported to the Cabo Verde islands is
described in detail with reference to dust samples collected on the ground from potential
source areas in northern Africa. Using a combination of cluster analysis and
subcompositional analysis, that work showed that differences in
mineralogical composition of ground samples can be detected on a regional
scale, whilst variations in internal mixing state are much more localised. In
transported dust, however, the mixing state was much less varied, suggesting
that local sources become well mixed during transport.</p>
      <p id="d1e882">In the present study, we used the compositional classes already
identified in the above work by cluster analysis and compared the temporal
trends in particle number concentrations with that of the biological
particles detected by the WIBS. In addition, we used mass spectra of the
previously identified mineral dust class to examine internal mixing of dust
with biological material using peak marker analysis. More specifically,
biological markers CN- (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 26) and CNO- (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42) were used to identify
those mineral dust particles which had a significant marker of internal
mixing with biological material and also compared the temporal trends in those particle number concentrations to the biological
particles detected by WIBS.</p>
      <p id="d1e910">This approach is similar to that used by Zawadowicz et al. (2019), who
examined the biological content of dust particles in North America by
comparing temporal trends in particle number of a WIBS with SPMS, in that
case the PALMS instrument. However, in our study, we have used different
criteria for biomarkers in the mass spectra, using chlorine to normalise
the biomarker signals rather than phosphorous. Chlorine is a ubiquitous
signal in transported mineral dust and is easily ionised because of its
high electro affinity. This reduces the temporal incoherence in biomarker
ion signals caused by the matrix effect.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page14478?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Long-term observations</title>
      <p id="d1e929">A clear seasonal trend for fluorescent and total particle concentrations
can be seen in Fig. 1a, with both being highest during winter and lowest in
summer. Monthly median bioaerosol concentrations as high as 45 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
were found with 95th percentile values exceeding 130 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during
strong dust events. Such peaks in concentrations are short lived and
regular. Figure 1b suggests that bioaerosols are a minority particle type,
with non-fluorescent concentrations consistently dominating particle
contributions. The fraction of fluorescent particles compared to total
particle concentrations was a mean value of 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 %. The 99th percentile
value was a fraction of 1.1 %, with some high-fraction events exceeding
1.5 % in October and May. These will be discussed in greater detail
further on. Figure 1c highlights how larger particles are observed during
winter. Note that there is no relationship between the total particle
concentration and fraction of fluorescent particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
but a strong correlation exists between fluorescent and non-fluorescent particle
concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e995">Panel <bold>(a)</bold> represents a box-and-whisker plot of both
average fluorescent (red) and total (blue) particle concentrations from
0.8 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Whiskers represent the 5th and 95th percentile values.
Boxes represent 14 d average values, with the mean shown as a black dot.
Grey dots indicate 15 min data. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the ratio of fluorescent
particle concentrations relative to total particle observations, while
panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the trend for the effective diameter (Deff) of fluorescent
particles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14473/2020/acp-20-14473-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Cluster products</title>
      <p id="d1e1029">Agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using Ward linkage
with Euclidean distance for all fluorescent particles. A four-cluster
solution produced the greatest Calinski–Harabasz score, with information
regarding their fluorescence in each channel, size and asymmetry shown in
Table 1.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1035">Characteristics of individual clusters when using a
four-cluster solution for exclusively fluorescent particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> represents
1 standard deviation, calculated using raw, non-zero particle data. AF
represents asymmetry factor as given by the WIBS-4M and % reflects the
contribution each cluster makes to the total fluorescent particle
observations. The “no.” column represents the number of particles classified
within a given cluster.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center">Fl 1 (a.u.) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">All</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1219.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 497.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1033.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 372.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1114.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 361.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1169.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 469.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25. 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 66.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">69.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 52.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">64.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 110.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">79.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 133.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center">Fl 2 (a.u.) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">All</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 82.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">132.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 221.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">453.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 453.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">80.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 215.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 44.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 61.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">68.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 51.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">39.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 36.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">64.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">309.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 299.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">495.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 276.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">618.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 373.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">348.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 313.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center">Fl 3 (a.u.) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">All</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 56.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">99.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 231.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">366.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 413.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">57.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 195.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 48.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 51.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">47.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 54.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 54.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">247.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 319.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">478.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 314.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">611.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 407.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">296.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 342.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">%</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">No.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7297</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">893 241</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">547 711</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">121 455</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1945">Solid lines represent the median fluorescence of
particles as a function of size, instrument channel and cluster. Dotted
lines represent 95th percentile values. The 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m bins have been used for all
fluorescence traces. Panels <bold>(a–d)</bold> represent Clusters 1–4, respectively, while
panel <bold>(e)</bold> represents the normalised size distribution of fluorescent particles
across all clusters, using 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m bins. Panel <bold>(f)</bold> represents the
average across all fluorescent particles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14473/2020/acp-20-14473-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1982">The proportion of the total fluorescent material that
each cluster contributes over the 11-month monitoring campaign. Values are
taken using 1 d integrations of cluster concentrations between 0.8 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Any gaps reflect missing data.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14473/2020/acp-20-14473-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1999">All fluorescent particles seen across the long-term campaign were included
in Fig. 2. Fluorescence generally increases with size, but this trend is not
equal across all channels and clusters. It is strongest for Clusters 1 and
4, which are also more fluorescent across most size ranges. Figure 2e shows
the small size of observed particles, with Clusters 3 and 4 being much
smaller than Clusters 1 and 2. Figure 2f shows the median fluorescence in
each channel across all fluorescent particles combined.</p>
      <p id="d1e2002">The relative proportion that each cluster contributes to the total
fluorescent concentration shows some variability but no clear trend. This
would suggest that Cabo Verde is generally exposed to the same particles
year round. Clusters 2 and 3 are clearly the two dominant clusters,
accounting for a combined total of approximately 90 % of fluorescent
particles. When compared to the average fluorescence values in Fig. 2, these
two clusters notably have the weakest fluorescence.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Back-trajectory analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2013">The 120 h back trajectories using National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)'s Hybrid Single-Particle
Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) merged with the Openair
package (Carslaw, 2012) were calculated from the observatory, with a
starting height set at 10 m. These trajectories were run every 3 h for
all 11 months of the campaign, using monthly meteorological data files
downloaded from NOAA. Figure 4 captures the enhanced fluorescent particle
concentrations seen during periods of continental outflow as compared to
Atlantic or coastal back trajectories. Furthermore, it appears that
continental trajectories predominantly occur during the same months that the
increase in fluorescent and total particles is seen (October–February). Back
trajectories were also calculated for periods where the fluorescent fraction
was greatest. Particularly high ratio events can be identified during October,
May and August in Fig. 1b. These events all show coastal back trajectories,
suggesting coastal sites have higher relative biological content.</p>
      <p id="d1e2016">Fluorescent particle properties were investigated as a function of
trajectory direction. Three week-long periods were chosen, where the
trajectories were consistently coming from a specific region. These regions
were oceanic, coastal and continental. Oceanic regions were defined by trajectories
that spent the previous 120 h passing across the Atlantic Ocean, never
passing landmass. Coastal regions were defined by northeasterly trajectories
passing along the edge of the African continent, and continental regions were described
by more easterly trajectories passing through the Sahara. As it
was important to have an entire week of trajectories coming from one source,
each of these regions was picked out at different times of the year. The
continental period took place from 25/01/2016 to 31/01/2016, the coastal from
20/06/2016 to 27/06/2016 and the marine from 20/04/2016 to 26/04/2016. Average
fluorescence across the four clusters and three channels has been compared for
particles from each region, as shown in Fig. 5. It does not appear that there
are significant differences in the fluorescent properties of particles
depending on their source region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Comparison to laboratory samples</title>
      <p id="d1e2027">It can be seen in Fig. 6 that all of the dust samples dispersed through
the WIBS-4M show relatively weak fluorescence across all three channels but
are on average more fluorescent than Clusters 2 and 3. This is particularly
true for Moroccan dust in Fl 1. Exposing these samples to gamma irradiation
produced little effect, marginally reducing the fluorescent properties of
Moroccan dust while increasing the fluorescence of the illite sample. The
size and asymmetry values are quite similar across all samples and compare
most closely with those of Cluster 2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Comparison to ICE-D LAAP-ToF measurements</title>
      <?pagebreak page14479?><p id="d1e2039">Analysis of the negative ion spectra revealed that sea-spray aerosol was the
dominant aerosol detected at the site by the LAAP-ToF, accounting for
approximately 87 % by number. The remainder was comprised of silicate
mineral dust (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %), calcium chloride (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %) and secondary
material (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 %). Cluster analysis of the WIBS-4A data produced a
four-cluster solution which was similar to the long-term CVAO cluster solution, featuring two weakly
fluorescent dominant clusters and two highly fluorescent, likely primary
biological aerosol particle (PBAP) clusters. A number concentration time
series of select LAAP-ToF and WIBS-4A data products are shown in Fig. 7,
where similarities in the trends of silicate dust and WIBS-4A Cluster 3 can
be observed during a dust event (10/08 onwards), suggesting that this
cluster may represent a biodust mixture which will now be examined further.</p>
      <p id="d1e2063">Deeper analysis of the LAAP-ToF silicate dust class was performed to screen
for potential biomarkers. Figure 8 shows example negative ion spectra from
laboratory samples of bacteria (top panel) and c-means fuzzy cluster
products from ICE-D representative of pure dust and dust containing
biomarkers (middle and bottom panels, respectively). It can be seen that the
biosilicate spectrogram contains silicate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks (e.g. SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and also bacterial biomarkers (e.g. CN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>CNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
which are not present in the pure dust spectra, suggesting that a subset
of the observed dust is mixed with biological material.</p>
      <p id="d1e2114">The LAAP-ToF silicate dust is then filtered for biomarkers using the ratio
of biomarkers to chlorine (CN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CNO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2134">The 120 h back-trajectory analysis for fluorescent
particle concentrations using HYSPLIT integrated with the Openair package.
Note that autumn is using 2015 data, as is the month of December during winter.
Spring and summer are using 2016 data. The colour scale has been capped at
100 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for visual purposes and only particles between 0.8 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m have been included.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14473/2020/acp-20-14473-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2165">Mean fluorescence and size properties for each cluster,
depending on the pathway of the previous 120 h trajectory. Each region
(marine, coastal and continental) have taken 1 week's worth of data, from
20/04/2016 to 26/04/2016, 20/06/2016 to 27/06/2016 and 25/01/2016 to 31/01/2016,
respectively. Columns represent Fl channels 1–3, with the final column
representing size in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14473/2020/acp-20-14473-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2182">A time series of the LAAP-ToF biosilicate and WIBS-4A Cluster 3 products
are shown in Fig. 9. Here, it can be seen that the general trends are in good
agreement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This suggests that the WIBS is sensitive to dust
particles which are mixed with bacteria, and that these particles can be
segregated from the general fluorescent aerosol population and classified
using the cluster analysis method described in Sect. 2.3. There is also a
moderate correlation between the WIBS-4A Cluster 3 and pure silicate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as expected, since the biosilicate
will be a subset of the pure silicate. The correlation between Cluster 3 and
sea spray is poor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), affirming that our observations of
fluorescent particles are genuine and are not being skewed by known
interferents.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2232">Mean fluorescence, size and shape properties of the four
dust samples put through the WIBS-4M in a laboratory environment and their
comparison to the two dominant long-term campaign clusters – Clusters 2 and 3.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14473/2020/acp-20-14473-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Long-range transport and trade winds</title>
      <?pagebreak page14482?><p id="d1e2257">The identified peaks in particle concentration are consistent with
back-trajectory analysis showing the sources to be Saharan. Strong Aeolian
generating mechanisms mean that potentially significant concentrations of
soil bacteria could have attached themselves to dust particles, which are acting as an agent for their
distribution and transport. More specifically, it is likely to be the
Harmattan wind that is driving these events. This is a north-easterly trade
wind that blows across Africa from approximately November to March,
although high concentrations of dust are already present almost all year
round (Prospero, 1999). Source regions in Tunisia and northern Algeria have
been identified before, as well as dust that has been transported from the
Chad Basin in the Bodélé Depression (Herrmann et al., 1999). Such Harmattan
dust clouds have often been found to affect the coastal regions of the Gulf of Guinea. These clouds are a major annual
event, noted for exacerbating cardiovascular health issues and increasing
daily mortality by 8.4 % (Perez et al., 2008). Previous studies by Enete
et al. (2012) found this dust to contain high quantities of silicon, which
is consistent with the LAAP-ToF results presented here.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2262">Time series of sea spray aerosol and silicate dust
particle numbers concentrations determined by LAAP-ToF and WIBS-4A Clusters 3 and 4; 20 min averages have been used here.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14473/2020/acp-20-14473-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2273">Average negative ion spectra of laboratory-generated
bacteria and the ICE-D silicate dust products.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14473/2020/acp-20-14473-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2283">It is interesting that continental back trajectories during summer do not
contain similar concentrations of fluorescent material, despite a similar fluorescent ratio and wind speeds to those seen
in winter. This is likely due to the seasonal shift in the ITCZ, as outlined by Chiapello et al. (1995). During
summer, the ITCZ is located between 6 and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, and dust gets transported into
the Saharan Air Layer (SAL) at a maximum altitude of 7000 m. At this height,
there is little opportunity for the dust to mix with trade winds, and it is
instead transported significant distances across the Atlantic. However,
during winter, the ITCZ shifts south and the dust<?pagebreak page14483?> is no longer able to get
taken into the SAL. This constrains the dust into lower altitudes, where they are subject to mixing with trade winds,
including the Harmattan wind. Dust consequently gets deposited much sooner
and often blankets Cabo Verde. The ecological consequences of this have been
investigated by Korte et al. (2017), who placed sediment traps across the
Atlantic to measure fluxes in biogenic constituents, including biogenic
silica. They observed higher biogenic fluxes during winter, due to Saharan
dust getting deposited during the previously discussed trade wind events.
They also observed a seasonal maxima of biogenic silica towards the west,
suggesting that the bioaerosols we observe are not as readily deposited into the ocean as some other
particle types.</p>
      <p id="d1e2295">It is also interesting to consider potential differences in dust from the
various source regions. This has been investigated by Patey et al. (2015),
who also monitored dust concentrations at the CVAO. By looking at specific
elemental ratios within dust samples, they were able to identify where the
dust was thought to have come from, as well as what it was comprised of.
They found during summer months that 92.5 % of samples contained a
contribution from the Sahel, compared to just 52.3 % of samples collected
during winter. These observations are supported by previous work from
Prospero and Lamb (2003), who found that it was Sahelian dust that was
predominantly transported across the Atlantic via the SAL during summer.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2300">Time series of WIBS Cluster 3 and silicate dust filtered for
biomarkers using 20 min averaged number counts normalised by the maximum
observed concentration for each instrument. Values for the inset plot are
also normalised to the maximum observed concentration.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14473/2020/acp-20-14473-2020-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Identification of fluorescent material</title>
      <p id="d1e2317">The relative contributions of each cluster in Fig. 3 highlight the
importance of Clusters 2 and 3. Furthermore, it shows that the mixture of
bioaerosols have no clear pattern, with each cluster present all year round.
The intensive measurements from the LAAP-ToF and WIBS-4A have provided
supporting evidence to suggest that most of the fluorescent particles
observed are mixtures of biological and non-biological material, i.e. bacteria attached
to dust. It is likely because of this that fluorescence intensity is
correlated<?pagebreak page14484?> with particle size. Larger particles may carry greater numbers of
bacteria due to increased surface area and as a result should carry more
fluorophores for detection by the instrument. The relationship between
fluorescence and particle size has been investigated extensively by Hill et
al. (2015), who have shown a generally positive correlation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2320">Concluding that Clusters 2 and 3 are at least partially bacterial in
nature is in contrast to findings by Savage et al. (2017), whose laboratory
tests on <italic>Bacillus atrophaeus, Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas stutzeri</italic> have produced different fluorescent spectra to those observed here.
In their tests, bacteria have been shown to fluoresce strongly in Fl 1 and
weakly in Fl 2 and 3, while our results show little increase in Fl 1
concentrations during winter but substantial increases in Fl 2 and 3.
However, it must be emphasised that they used “pure” bacterial samples,
potentially unrepresentative of the mixed aggregates we observed.</p>
      <p id="d1e2329">Furthermore, they outline previous work by Agranovski et al. (2004), who
found that an ultraviolet aerodynamic particle sizer (UV-APS) was effective in identifying fluorophores at similar
wavelengths that a WIBS-4A was unsuccessful in doing so. They hypothesise
reasons for this, including potential differences in gain voltages applied
in the instrument, and weaker excitation intensity in Xe2 with respect to
Xe1. With that considered, it must also be noted that there are high levels
of agreement between the WIBS-4A used in the intensive measurements and the
WIBS-4M for 11 months. As such, the more likely explanation may simply be
differences between the samples used in the laboratory and those measured at the observatory.
Without proper characterisation of a bacteria–dust aggregate in a controlled
setting it is difficult to interpret how this could impact the emissions
spectra. Internal reabsorption of fluorescence is known to occur when
emitted fluorescent wavelengths overlap with a particle's absorption
spectrum. In this instance, it is possible that the dust absorbs certain
wavelengths emitted from the bacteria, skewing what is detected by the
instrument. It must be emphasised that applying a 9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold to the
fluorescent baseline of the WIBS-4M means that our observations are unlikely to be interferents.</p>
      <p id="d1e2339">Clusters 1 and 4 are interesting because of their high fluorescence
intensity. It is possible that these clusters represent “pure” bioaerosols,
that have not mixed with non-fluorescent material or are relatively more
exposed due to, for example, larger bacterial aggregates present. Cluster
1's spectral profile matches closely with laboratory experiments using
bacteria (Savage et al., 2017), with a strong fluorescence in Fl 1 seen across all size ranges.
However, Cluster 4 remains difficult to identify. It shows similarly
high-intensity fluorescence to Cluster 1 but only in Fl 2 and 3. Its relative
contribution to the total bioaerosol count is significant, yet given the
location of the observatory seems unlikely to be other common terrestrial
bioaerosols such as pollen fragments. Although it may therefore seem likely
to have a marine source, its concentrations follow similar seasonal trends
to the other clusters which are more easily explained by Aeolian events.
With potential differences in their capacity to act as ice nucleators when compared to bacteria and dust aggregates, it is useful to
quantify their concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d1e2343">The dust samples dispersed into the WIBS-4M also support our argument that
bacteria–dust aggregates are our dominant bioaerosol type. Many of the
sampled particles shared similar spectral profiles to those for Clusters 2
and 3, being weakly fluorescent in all three channels. Each sample also predominantly consisted
of non-fluorescent particles, sharing a similarly low fluorescent particle
ratio to our campaign observations.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14485?><p id="d1e2346">Although the 9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold we have used should eliminate weakly
fluorescent non-biological particles, the potential for more highly
fluorescent particles to act as interferents should be discussed. Soot is
one example, with previous studies having observed higher fluorescence than is typically seen for non-biological
particles. Despite this, there are multiple reasons that we do not believe
interferents are contributing to particle concentrations. Firstly, studies
that found soot to fluoresce above their thresholds had usually only done so
when using 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> thresholding. Toprak and Schnaiter (2013) found propane
flame soot to only weakly fluoresce in Fl1 at this threshold, and so we
would not expect it to be fluorescent at a more conservative 9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
thresholding. Secondly, the sizes of the observed fluorescent particles are
larger than we would expect for soot. Toprak and Schnaiter (2013) found generated soot to only be 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m after
significant coagulation time in the NAUA chamber, while Savage et al. (2017)
used a mechanically dispersed dry diesel soot powder to investigate
potential interferent aerosol fluorescence. They noted that this powder fluoresced above a conservative 9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
threshold, but this sample aerosol was much larger than soot typically
observed in the atmosphere when aerosolised (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m).
Savage et al. (2017) also acknowledged that fluorescence intensity is a strong function
of particle size due to surface area/volume effects and that this test
soot was likely to be significantly more fluorescent than ambient diesel soot as a result.
Furthermore, Savage and Huffman (2018) acknowledge that more highly
fluorescent soot is representative of freshly generated soot close to
source and is not representative of aged or processed soot. Ambient soot at
CVAO should not be fluorescent at 9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. While it is possible that soot
could have internally mixed with dust and therefore become larger, this
would still represent aged soot and would be less fluorescent.</p>
      <p id="d1e2408">We also acknowledge the fraction identified as biological is small
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %) and that concentrations would consequently be significantly
affected by even minor errors in the classification of particle types.
However, if a fraction of non-biological particles were “bleeding” through
and influencing our concentrations, their mass spectral signatures would
differ from our “biosilicate” class. As there is a close correlation
between the biosilicate particle counts and our fluorescent fraction, we do
not believe that bleeding is significantly changing our observations. More
studies comparing such a technique may elucidate the degree to which bleeding occurs, but we believe our study provides a good first
estimate of bioaerosol concentrations in this region. As discussed by Savage
et al. (2017), UV-LIF results should be considered uniquely in all
situations with appreciation of possible influences. We are confident that
many common interferent particles such as soot can be further discounted
when evaluating properties such as particle size, as well as an appreciation
for modelled back trajectories and identified source regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Comparison to previous studies</title>
      <p id="d1e2426">The results presented here are broadly consistent with previous studies
demonstrating that mineral dust is often observed to be mixed with
biological material, e.g. Yamaguchi et al. (2012), Griffin et al. (2001) and
Maki et al. (2018). Similar to the approach used here, a recent study by
Zawadowicz et al. (2019) assessed the prevalence of biological material over
the continental United States using single particle mass spectrometry and UV-LIF, finding
that 30 % to 80 % of biological particles were mixed with mineral dust.
While they provide evidence for biomineral mixtures in their study, the
fluorescent number concentration derived from the WIBS is likely an
overestimate of the true bioaerosol concentration due to the choice of 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
thresholding including pure mineral dust interferents in their assumed
bioaerosol population, as a small but significant subset of mineral dust
naturally exhibits weak fluorescence (Huffman et al., 2019; Savage et al.,
2017; Crawford et al., 2016; Pöhlker et al., 2012). The conservative 9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold used in our study excludes
these non-biological interferents from the presented PBAP classes (Savage et
al., 2017). Furthermore, the use of only negative ion spectra makes
resolving biominerals from pure minerals challenging. The use of both
positive and negative ion spectra in our study provides greater particle
information and consequently improves our ability to classify biological and pure
minerals as distinct groups (Shen et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2453">This study has utilised UV-LIF technology to provide long-term measurements
of bioaerosol concentrations within an important but often overlooked
region of the world. Seasonal variations in both fluorescent and total
particle concentrations are clearly observed, likely as a result of the
annual patterns of the ITCZ and subsequent mixing with trade winds. This can
be readily seen from the HYSPLIT back trajectories, with the highest
particle concentrations coming from mainland Africa during winter months.</p>
      <p id="d1e2456">When considering the source regions in the Sahara and significant
correlation between fluorescent and non-fluorescent particle
concentrations, it is presumed we are observing high mineral dust
concentrations with some associated bacteria. This is supported through the
LAAP-ToF and WIBS-4A intensive measurements, with a significant correlation
between the LAAP-ToF's biosilicate  counts and the concentrations of a
clustered subset from the WIBS-4A.</p>
      <p id="d1e2459">Cluster analysis results from the WIBS-4A compare favourably with those from
the WIBS-4M, with both suggesting four-cluster solutions that share similar
fluorescent profiles. For the long-term campaign, Clusters 2 and 3 dominate
fluorescent particle contributions, accounting for approximately 90 % of
all bioaerosols. Both are weakly fluorescent, but with a 9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold
having been applied they are<?pagebreak page14486?> unlikely to be interferents. A laboratory experiment
using representative dust samples has shown similar fluorescent properties to these clusters, helping to
contextualise our observations. These presumed bacteria and dust aggregates
are still a minority particle type, accounting for a mean 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 %
of total coarse aerosol concentrations. Although this ratio is
relatively low, it should be noted that the raw number of bioaerosols
present is still quite high, with monthly median concentrations as high as 45 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 95th
percentile values exceeding 130 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Highly fluorescent and likely
primary bioaerosols have also been identified in Clusters 1 and 4,
accounting for an average 6.6 % of total fluorescent particles. These have
not been conclusively identified, but it should be stated that Cluster 1 most
closely resembles the spectral profile of pure bacteria outlined by Savage
et al. (2017), while Cluster 4 remains unidentified.</p>
      <p id="d1e2500"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Our long-term measurements are consistent with the observations of Korte
et al. (2017), who made an association between the deposition of biogenic
silica along the Atlantic and high levels of dust from the African
continent. It would be interesting for future work to determine whether
there are microbial differences within this dust when compared to other
regions, following the approach described by Maki et al. (2018). Either
the presence of more efficiently ice-nucleating bacteria strains or simply
greater concentrations could potentially explain why Sassen et al. (2003)
found dust in African outflow to ice nucleate at significantly warmer
temperatures than similar studies by Ansmann et
al. (2008) and Zhang et al. (2012). Such work would have the capacity to
improve global climate model (GCM) simulations.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page14487?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title/>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e2517">Summary of the average fluorescence, size and AF of each
cluster from the long-term campaign.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/14473/2020/acp-20-14473-2020-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2534">Due to the large file sizes for the dataset, it is available upon request
to the lead author.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e2537">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14473-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14473-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2546">DM is a PhD student and primary author for this paper, responsible
for most written components. IC processed the data, contributed to
the analysis and provided guidance on the paper's contents. NM was
involved in operating and analysing the data from the LAAP-ToF and has
collaborated with IC to write the sections pertaining to the
LAAP-ToF. NM has also sourced the dust samples for the lab experiments.
MF was involved in the planning and execution of both the short-term
and long-term components of the project, as well as providing an estimate of the
transmission efficiency of the sampling line. KR manages the CVAO
World Meteorological Organization – Global Atmospheric Watch (WMO-GAW)
station and provided support and access to facilities for this
experiment as part of ICE-D, including meteorological data which are archived
at the WMO-GAW and British Atmospheric Data Centre (BADC). NL was
responsible for instrument operation and maintenance during the long-term
campaign. VF is part of DSTL and provided technical support and loan of
UV-LIF instrumentation. PK and WS helped in maintenance and
repair of the instrument. HC was involved in the short-term component of
the project, while DT has provided guidance on the direction and written
components of the paper. MG has overseen the entire project, acting
as the primary lead. MG is the supervisor of DM and has offered
guidance at every stage.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2552">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2558">This project was funded by NERC as part of the ICE-D campaign
(NE/M001954/1). Douglas Morrison's PhD studentship was funded by the NERC Doctoral
Training Program (DTP). Ian Crawford has been funded as part of the BIOARC
campaign (NE/S002049/1). We thank DMT for the loan of the WIBS-4A used in
the LAAP-ToF comparison.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2563">This research has been supported by NERC (grant nos. NE/M001954/1 and NE/S002049/1).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2569">This paper was edited by Anne Perring and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Agranovski, V., Ristovski, Z. D., Ayoko, G. A., and Morawska, L.:
Performance evaluation of the UVAPS in measuring biological aerosols:
fluorescence spectra from NAD (P) H coenzymes and riboflavin, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 38, 354–364, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ansmann, A., Tesche, M., Althausen, D., Müller, D., Seifert, P.,
Freudenthaler, V., Heese, B., Wiegner, M., Pisani, G., Knippertz, P., and Dubovik, O.:  Influence of Saharan dust on cloud glaciation in southern Morocco during
the Saharan Mineral Dust Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008785, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bauer, H., Kasper-Giebl, A., Löflund, M., Giebl, H., Hitzenberger, R.,
Zibuschka, F., and Puxbaum, H.: The contribution of bacteria and fungal
spores to the organic carbon content of cloud water, precipitation and
aerosols, Atmos. Res., 64, 109–119, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bauer, H., Giebl, H., Hitzenberger, R., Kasper-Giebl, A., Reischl, G.,
Zibuschka, F., and Puxbaum, H.: Airborne bacteria as cloud condensation nuclei, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003545, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Carpenter, L., Fleming, Z., Read, K., Lee, J., Moller, S., Hopkins, J.,
Purvis, R., Lewis, A., Müller, K., Heinold, B., Herrmann, H., Wadinga Fomba,  K., van Pinxteren, D., Müller, C., Tegen, I., Wiedensohler, A., Müller, T., Niedermeier, N., Achterberg, E. P., Patey, M. D., Kozlova, E. A., Heimann, M., Heard, D. E., Plane, J. M. C., Mahajan, A., Oetjen, H., Ingham, T., Stone, D., Whalley, L. K., Evans, M. J., Pilling, M. J., Leigh, R. J., Monks, P. S., Karunaharan, A., Vaughan, S., Arnold, S. R., Tschritter, J., Pöhler, D., Frieß, U., Holla, R., Mendes, L. M., Lopez, H., Faria, B., Manning,  A. J., and Wallace, D. W. R.: Seasonal characteristics of tropical marine boundary layer air measured at the Cape Verde
Atmospheric Observatory, J. Atmos. Chem., 67, 87–140,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, R.: An R package for air quality data analysis, Environmental
Modelling and Software, 27, 52–61, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Chiapello, I., Bergametti, G., Gomes, L., Chatenet, B., Dulac, F.,
Pimenta, J., and Suares, E. S.: An additional low layer transport of
Sahelian and Saharan dust over the north-eastern tropical Atlantic,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 3191–3194, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crawford, I., Robinson, N. H., Flynn, M. J., Foot, V. E., Gallagher, M. W., Huffman, J. A., Stanley, W. R., and Kaye, P. H.: Characterisation of bioaerosol emissions from a Colorado pine forest: results from the BEACHON-RoMBAS experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8559–8578, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8559-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8559-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crawford, I., Ruske, S., Topping, D. O., and Gallagher, M. W.: Evaluation of hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis methods for discrimination of primary biological aerosol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4979–4991, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4979-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-4979-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crawford, I., Lloyd, G., Herrmann, E., Hoyle, C. R., Bower, K. N., Connolly, P. J., Flynn, M. J., Kaye, P. H., Choularton, T. W., and Gallagher, M. W.: Observations of fluorescent aerosol-cloud interactions in the free troposphere at the High-Altitude Research Station Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2273–2284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2273-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2273-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Enete, I. C., Igu, I., Ayadiulo, R., Ifeanyi, C., Enete, E., Obienusi, A., Igu, I. N. and Ayadiulo, R.: Harmattan dust: composition,
characteristics and effects on soil fertility in Enugu, Nigeria, British
J. Appl. Sci. Technol., 2, 72–81, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14489?><ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Engelstaedter, S., Tegen, I., and Washington, R.: North African dust
emissions and transport, Earth-Sci. Rev., 79, 73–100, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Folland, C., Owen, J., Ward, M. N., and Colman, A.: Prediction of seasonal
rainfall in the Sahel region using empirical and dynamical methods, J. Forecast., 10, 21–56, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Forde, E., Gallagher, M., Walker, M., Foot, V., Attwood, A., Granger, G.,
Sarda-Estève, R., Stanley, W., Kaye, P., and Topping, D.: Intercomparison of Multiple UV-LIF Spectrometers Using the Aerosol Challenge
Simulator, Atmosphere, 10, 797, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10120797, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Franc, G. D. and DeMott, P. J.: Cloud activation characteristics of airborne
Erwinia carotovora cells, J. Appl. Meteorol., 37, 1293–1300,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Kampf, C. J., Weber, B., Huffman, J. A.,
Pöhlker, C., Andreae, M. O., Lang-Yona, N., Burrows, S. M., Gunthe, S.
S., Elbert, W., et al.: Bioaerosols in the Earth system: Climate, health, and
ecosystem interactions, Atmos. Res., 182, 346–376, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gabey, A. M., Gallagher, M. W., Whitehead, J., Dorsey, J. R., Kaye, P. H., and Stanley, W. R.: Measurements and comparison of primary biological aerosol above and below a tropical forest canopy using a dual channel fluorescence spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4453–4466, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4453-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4453-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gosselin, M. I., Rathnayake, C. M., Crawford, I., Pöhlker, C., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Schmer, B., Després, V. R., Engling, G., Gallagher, M., Stone, E., Pöschl, U., and Huffman, J. A.: Fluorescent bioaerosol particle, molecular tracer, and fungal spore concentrations during dry and rainy periods in a semi-arid forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15165–15184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15165-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-15165-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Griffin, D. W., Garrison, V. H., Herman, J. R., and Shinn, E. A.: African
desert dust in the Caribbean atmosphere: microbiology and public health,
Aerobiologia, 17, 203–213, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Haga, D., Iannone, R., Wheeler, M., Mason, R., Polishchuk, E., Fetch Jr, T.,
Van Der Kamp, B., McKendry, I., and Bertram, A.: Ice nucleation properties of rust and bunt fungal spores and their transport to high
altitudes, where they can cause heterogeneous freezing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7260–7272, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Herrmann, L., Stahr, K., and Jahn, R.: The importance of source region
identification and their properties for soil-derived dust: the case of
Harmattan dust sources for eastern West Africa, Beitrage zur Physik der
Atmosphare-Contributions to Atmospheric Physics, 72, 141–150, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hill, S. C., Mayo, M. W., and Chang, R. K.: Fluorescence of bacteria,
pollens, and naturally occurring airborne particles: excitation/emission
spectra, Tech. Rep., Army research lab adelphi md computational and
information sciences directorate, 50 pp., 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hill, S. C., Williamson, C. C., Doughty, D. C., Pan, Y.-L., Santarpia, J.
L., and Hill, H. H.: Size-dependent fluorescence of bioaerosols:
Mathematical model using fluorescing and absorbing molecules in bacteria,
J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 157, 54–70, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huffman, J. A., Sinha, B., Garland, R. M., Snee-Pollmann, A., Gunthe, S. S., Artaxo, P., Martin, S. T., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Size distributions and temporal variations of biological aerosol particles in the Amazon rainforest characterized by microscopy and real-time UV-APS fluorescence techniques during AMAZE-08, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11997–12019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11997-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11997-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Huffman, J. A., Perring, A. E., Savage, N. J., Clot, B., Crouzy, B., Tummon,
F., Shoshanim, O., Damit, B., Schneider, J., Sivaprakasam, V., et al.:
Real-time sensing of bioaerosols: Review and current perspectives, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 54, 1–31, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1664724, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kaye, P. H., Aptowicz, K., Chang, R. K., Foot, V., and Videen, G.: Angularly
resolved elastic scattering from airborne particles, in: Optics of
Biological Particles, Springer, 31–61, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Korte, L. F., Brummer, G.-J. A., van der Does, M., Guerreiro, C. V., Hennekam, R., van Hateren, J. A., Jong, D., Munday, C. I., Schouten, S., and Stuut, J.-B. W.: Downward particle fluxes of biogenic matter and Saharan dust across the equatorial North Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6023–6040, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6023-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-6023-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lakowicz, J. R.: Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy, Springer Science
&amp; Business Media, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Wang, Z., Liu, Z., Winker, D., and Trepte, C.: A height resolved
global view of dust aerosols from the first year CALIPSO lidar measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009776, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Taylor, J. W., Crosier, J., Marsden, N., Bower, K. N., Lloyd, G., Ryder, C. L., Brooke, J. K., Cotton, R., Marenco, F., Blyth, A., Cui, Z., Estelles, V., Gallagher, M., Coe, H., and Choularton, T. W.: Aircraft and ground measurements of dust aerosols over the west African coast in summer 2015 during ICE-D and AER-D, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3817–3838, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3817-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-3817-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Maki, T., Furumoto, S., Asahi, Y., Lee, K. C., Watanabe, K., Aoki, K., Murakami, M., Tajiri, T., Hasegawa, H., Mashio, A., and Iwasaka, Y.: Long-range-transported bioaerosols captured in snow cover on Mount Tateyama, Japan: impacts of Asian-dust events on airborne bacterial dynamics relating to ice-nucleation activities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8155–8171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8155-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-8155-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marsden, N., Flynn, M. J., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., and Coe, H.: Evaluating the influence of laser wavelength and detection stage geometry on optical detection efficiency in a single-particle mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 6051–6068, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marsden, N. A., Flynn, M. J., Allan, J. D., and Coe, H.: Online differentiation of mineral phase in aerosol particles by ion formation mechanism using a LAAP-TOF single-particle mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 195–213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-195-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-195-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marsden, N. A., Ullrich, R., Möhler, O., Eriksen Hammer, S., Kandler, K., Cui, Z., Williams, P. I., Flynn, M. J., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., and Coe, H.: Mineralogy and mixing state of north African mineral dust by online single-particle mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2259–2281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2259-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-2259-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
McFarland, A., O. C.: Characterization of Sierra-Anderson Model 321a mm Size
Selective Inlet for Hi-Vol Samplers, Air Quality Laboratory, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14490?><ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
McTainsh, G.: Dust concentrations and particle-size characteristics of an
intense dust haze event: inland delta region, Mali, West Africa, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1081–1090, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M.: The design of single particle laser mass spectrometers,
Mass Spec. Rev., 26, 150–165, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Patey, M. D., Achterberg, E. P., Rijkenberg, M. J., and Pearce, R.: Aerosol
time-series measurements over the tropical Northeast Atlantic Ocean: dust
sources, elemental composition and mineralogy, Mar. Chem., 174,
103–119, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Perez, L., Tobias, A., Querol, X., Künzli, N., Pey, J., Alastuey, A.,
Viana, M., Valero, N., González-Cabré, M., and Sunyer, J.: Coarse
particles from Saharan dust and daily mortality, Epidemiology, 19, 800–807,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Perring, A., Schwarz, J., Baumgardner, D., Hernandez, M., Spracklen, D.,
Heald, C., Gao, R., Kok, G., McMeeking, G., McQuaid, J., and Fahey, D. W.: Airborne
observations of regional variation in fluorescent aerosol across the United
States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 1153–1170, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pöhlker, C., Huffman, J. A., and Pöschl, U.: Autofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols – fluorescent biomolecules and potential interferences, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 37–71, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-37-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-37-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pope, F.: Pollen grains are efficient cloud condensation nuclei,
Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 044015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/044015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/044015</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pratt, K. A. and Prather, K. A.: Mass spectrometry of atmospheric
aerosols – Recent developments and applications. Part II: On-line mass
spectrometry techniques, Mass Spec. Rev., 31, 17–48, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pratt, K. A., DeMott, P. J., French, J. R., Wang, Z., Westphal, D. L.,
Heymsfield, A. J., Twohy, C. H., Prenni, A. J., and Prather, K. A.: In situ
detection of biological particles in cloud ice-crystals, Nat. Geosci.,
2, 398–401, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M.: Long-term measurements of the transport of African
mineral dust to the southeastern United States: Implications for regional
air quality, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 15917–15927, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M. and Lamb, P. J.: African droughts and dust transport to the
Caribbean: Climate change implications, Science, 302, 1024–1027, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Reinard, M. S. and Johnston, M. V.: Ion formation mechanism in laser
desorption ionization of individual nanoparticles, Journal of the
American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 19, 389–399, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Robinson, N. H., Allan, J. D., Huffman, J. A., Kaye, P. H., Foot, V. E., and Gallagher, M.: Cluster analysis of WIBS single-particle bioaerosol data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 337–347, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-337-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-337-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ruske, S., Topping, D. O., Foot, V. E., Kaye, P. H., Stanley, W. R., Crawford, I., Morse, A. P., and Gallagher, M. W.: Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for classification of primary biological aerosol using a new UV-LIF spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 695–708, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-695-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-695-2017</ext-link>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rypien, K. L.: African dust is an unlikely source of Aspergillus sydowii,
the causative agent of sea fan disease, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 367, 125–131, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sands, D. C.,  Langhans, V. E., Scharen, A. L., and De Smet, G.: The association between
bacteria and rain and possible resultant meteorological implications, 148–152,
1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sassen, K., DeMott, P. J., Prospero, J. M., and Poellot, M. R.: Saharan dust
storms and indirect aerosol effects on clouds: CRYSTAL-FACE results,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017371" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL017371</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Savage, N. J., Krentz, C. E., Könemann, T., Han, T. T., Mainelis, G., Pöhlker, C., and Huffman, J. A.: Systematic characterization and fluorescence threshold strategies for the wideband integrated bioaerosol sensor (WIBS) using size-resolved biological and interfering particles, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4279–4302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4279-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-4279-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shen, X., Ramisetty, R., Mohr, C., Huang, W., Leisner, T., and Saathoff, H.: Laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight mass spectrometer (LAAPTOF): performance, reference spectra and classification of atmospheric samples, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2325–2343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2325-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-2325-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Steiner, A. L.,
Brooks, S. D., Deng, C., Thornton, D. C., Pendleton, M. W., and Bryant, V.:
Pollen as atmospheric cloud condensation nuclei, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3596–3602, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sultan, B., Labadi, K., Guégan, J.-F., and Janicot, S.: Climate drives
the meningitis epidemics onset in West Africa, PLoS Medicine, 2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pmed.0020006</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Toprak, E. and Schnaiter, M.: Fluorescent biological aerosol particles measured with the Waveband Integrated Bioaerosol Sensor WIBS-4: laboratory tests combined with a one year field study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 225–243, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-225-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-225-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yamaguchi, N., Ichijo, T., Sakotani, A., Baba, T., and Nasu, M.: Global
dispersion of bacterial cells on Asian dust, Sci. Rep., 2, 525, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00525" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep00525</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Yankofsky, S., Levin, Z., Bertold, T., and Sandlerman, N.: Some basic
characteristics of bacterial freezing nuclei, J. Appl. Meteorol., 20, 1013–1019, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zawadowicz, M. A., Froyd, K. D., Perring, A. E., Murphy, D. M., Spracklen, D. V., Heald, C. L., Buseck, P. R., and Cziczo, D. J.: Model-measurement consistency and limits of bioaerosol abundance over the continental United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13859–13870, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13859-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-13859-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zhang, D., Wang, Z., Heymsfield, A., Fan, J., Liu, D., and Zhao, M.:
Quantifying the impact of dust on heterogeneous ice generation in midlevel supercooled stratiform clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052831,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Quantifying bioaerosol concentrations in dust clouds through online UV-LIF and mass spectrometry measurements at the Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Observations of the long-range transport of biological
particles in the tropics via dust vectors are now seen as fundamental to
the understanding of many global atmosphere–ocean biogeochemical cycles,
changes in air quality, human health, ecosystem impacts, and climate.
However, there is a lack of long-term measurements quantifying their
presence in such conditions. Here, we present annual observations of
bioaerosol concentrations based on online ultraviolet laser-induced
fluorescence (UV-LIF) spectrometry from the  World Meteorological
Organization – Global Atmospheric Watch (WMO-GAW)
Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory on São Vicente. We observe
the expected strong seasonal changes in absolute concentrations of
bioaerosols with significant enhancements during winter due to the strong
island inflow of air mass, originating from the African continent.
Monthly median bioaerosol concentrations as high as 45&thinsp;L<sup>−1</sup> were
found with 95th percentile values exceeding 130&thinsp;L<sup>−1</sup> during strong
dust events. However, in contrast, the relative fraction of
bioaerosol numbers compared to total dust number concentration
shows little seasonal variation. Mean bioaerosol
contributions accounted for 0.4&thinsp;±&thinsp;0.2&thinsp;% of total coarse aerosol
concentrations, only rarely exceeding 1&thinsp;% during particularly strong
events under appropriate conditions. Although enhancements in the median
bioaerosol fraction do occur in winter, they also occur at other times of
the year, likely due to the enhanced Aeolian activity driving dust events at
this time from different sources. We hypothesise that this indicates the
relative contribution of bioaerosol material in dust transported across
the tropical Atlantic throughout the year is relatively uniform, comprised
mainly of mixtures of dust and bacteria and/or bacterial fragments. We
argue that this hypothesis is supported from analysis of measurements also
at Cabo Verde just prior to the long-term monitoring experiment where UV-LIF
single particle measurements were compared with laser ablation aerosol
particle time-of-flight mass spectrometer (LAAP-ToF) measurements. These
clearly show a very high correlation between particles with mixed
biosilicate mass spectral signatures and UV-LIF biofluorescent signatures
suggesting the bioaerosol concentrations are dominated by these mixtures.
These observations should assist with constraining bioaerosol concentrations for tropical global
climate model (GCM) simulations. Note that here we use the term <q>bioaerosol</q> to
include mixtures of dust and bacterial material.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Agranovski, V., Ristovski, Z. D., Ayoko, G. A., and Morawska, L.:
Performance evaluation of the UVAPS in measuring biological aerosols:
fluorescence spectra from NAD (P) H coenzymes and riboflavin, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 38, 354–364, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ansmann, A., Tesche, M., Althausen, D., Müller, D., Seifert, P.,
Freudenthaler, V., Heese, B., Wiegner, M., Pisani, G., Knippertz, P., and Dubovik, O.:  Influence of Saharan dust on cloud glaciation in southern Morocco during
the Saharan Mineral Dust Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008785, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bauer, H., Kasper-Giebl, A., Löflund, M., Giebl, H., Hitzenberger, R.,
Zibuschka, F., and Puxbaum, H.: The contribution of bacteria and fungal
spores to the organic carbon content of cloud water, precipitation and
aerosols, Atmos. Res., 64, 109–119, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bauer, H., Giebl, H., Hitzenberger, R., Kasper-Giebl, A., Reischl, G.,
Zibuschka, F., and Puxbaum, H.: Airborne bacteria as cloud condensation nuclei, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003545, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Carpenter, L., Fleming, Z., Read, K., Lee, J., Moller, S., Hopkins, J.,
Purvis, R., Lewis, A., Müller, K., Heinold, B., Herrmann, H., Wadinga Fomba,  K., van Pinxteren, D., Müller, C., Tegen, I., Wiedensohler, A., Müller, T., Niedermeier, N., Achterberg, E. P., Patey, M. D., Kozlova, E. A., Heimann, M., Heard, D. E., Plane, J. M. C., Mahajan, A., Oetjen, H., Ingham, T., Stone, D., Whalley, L. K., Evans, M. J., Pilling, M. J., Leigh, R. J., Monks, P. S., Karunaharan, A., Vaughan, S., Arnold, S. R., Tschritter, J., Pöhler, D., Frieß, U., Holla, R., Mendes, L. M., Lopez, H., Faria, B., Manning,  A. J., and Wallace, D. W. R.: Seasonal characteristics of tropical marine boundary layer air measured at the Cape Verde
Atmospheric Observatory, J. Atmos. Chem., 67, 87–140,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, R.: An R package for air quality data analysis, Environmental
Modelling and Software, 27, 52–61, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chiapello, I., Bergametti, G., Gomes, L., Chatenet, B., Dulac, F.,
Pimenta, J., and Suares, E. S.: An additional low layer transport of
Sahelian and Saharan dust over the north-eastern tropical Atlantic,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 3191–3194, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Crawford, I., Robinson, N. H., Flynn, M. J., Foot, V. E., Gallagher, M. W., Huffman, J. A., Stanley, W. R., and Kaye, P. H.: Characterisation of bioaerosol emissions from a Colorado pine forest: results from the BEACHON-RoMBAS experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8559–8578, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8559-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8559-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Crawford, I., Ruske, S., Topping, D. O., and Gallagher, M. W.: Evaluation of hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis methods for discrimination of primary biological aerosol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4979–4991, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4979-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4979-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Crawford, I., Lloyd, G., Herrmann, E., Hoyle, C. R., Bower, K. N., Connolly, P. J., Flynn, M. J., Kaye, P. H., Choularton, T. W., and Gallagher, M. W.: Observations of fluorescent aerosol-cloud interactions in the free troposphere at the High-Altitude Research Station Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2273–2284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2273-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2273-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Enete, I. C., Igu, I., Ayadiulo, R., Ifeanyi, C., Enete, E., Obienusi, A., Igu, I. N. and Ayadiulo, R.: Harmattan dust: composition,
characteristics and effects on soil fertility in Enugu, Nigeria, British
J. Appl. Sci. Technol., 2, 72–81, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Engelstaedter, S., Tegen, I., and Washington, R.: North African dust
emissions and transport, Earth-Sci. Rev., 79, 73–100, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Folland, C., Owen, J., Ward, M. N., and Colman, A.: Prediction of seasonal
rainfall in the Sahel region using empirical and dynamical methods, J. Forecast., 10, 21–56, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Forde, E., Gallagher, M., Walker, M., Foot, V., Attwood, A., Granger, G.,
Sarda-Estève, R., Stanley, W., Kaye, P., and Topping, D.: Intercomparison of Multiple UV-LIF Spectrometers Using the Aerosol Challenge
Simulator, Atmosphere, 10, 797, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10120797, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Franc, G. D. and DeMott, P. J.: Cloud activation characteristics of airborne
Erwinia carotovora cells, J. Appl. Meteorol., 37, 1293–1300,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Kampf, C. J., Weber, B., Huffman, J. A.,
Pöhlker, C., Andreae, M. O., Lang-Yona, N., Burrows, S. M., Gunthe, S.
S., Elbert, W., et al.: Bioaerosols in the Earth system: Climate, health, and
ecosystem interactions, Atmos. Res., 182, 346–376, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gabey, A. M., Gallagher, M. W., Whitehead, J., Dorsey, J. R., Kaye, P. H., and Stanley, W. R.: Measurements and comparison of primary biological aerosol above and below a tropical forest canopy using a dual channel fluorescence spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4453–4466, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4453-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4453-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Gosselin, M. I., Rathnayake, C. M., Crawford, I., Pöhlker, C., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Schmer, B., Després, V. R., Engling, G., Gallagher, M., Stone, E., Pöschl, U., and Huffman, J. A.: Fluorescent bioaerosol particle, molecular tracer, and fungal spore concentrations during dry and rainy periods in a semi-arid forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15165–15184, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15165-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15165-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Griffin, D. W., Garrison, V. H., Herman, J. R., and Shinn, E. A.: African
desert dust in the Caribbean atmosphere: microbiology and public health,
Aerobiologia, 17, 203–213, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Haga, D., Iannone, R., Wheeler, M., Mason, R., Polishchuk, E., Fetch Jr, T.,
Van Der Kamp, B., McKendry, I., and Bertram, A.: Ice nucleation properties of rust and bunt fungal spores and their transport to high
altitudes, where they can cause heterogeneous freezing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7260–7272, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Herrmann, L., Stahr, K., and Jahn, R.: The importance of source region
identification and their properties for soil-derived dust: the case of
Harmattan dust sources for eastern West Africa, Beitrage zur Physik der
Atmosphare-Contributions to Atmospheric Physics, 72, 141–150, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, S. C., Mayo, M. W., and Chang, R. K.: Fluorescence of bacteria,
pollens, and naturally occurring airborne particles: excitation/emission
spectra, Tech. Rep., Army research lab adelphi md computational and
information sciences directorate, 50 pp., 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, S. C., Williamson, C. C., Doughty, D. C., Pan, Y.-L., Santarpia, J.
L., and Hill, H. H.: Size-dependent fluorescence of bioaerosols:
Mathematical model using fluorescing and absorbing molecules in bacteria,
J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 157, 54–70, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Huffman, J. A., Sinha, B., Garland, R. M., Snee-Pollmann, A., Gunthe, S. S., Artaxo, P., Martin, S. T., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Size distributions and temporal variations of biological aerosol particles in the Amazon rainforest characterized by microscopy and real-time UV-APS fluorescence techniques during AMAZE-08, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11997–12019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11997-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11997-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Huffman, J. A., Perring, A. E., Savage, N. J., Clot, B., Crouzy, B., Tummon,
F., Shoshanim, O., Damit, B., Schneider, J., Sivaprakasam, V., et al.:
Real-time sensing of bioaerosols: Review and current perspectives, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 54, 1–31, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1664724, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Kaye, P. H., Aptowicz, K., Chang, R. K., Foot, V., and Videen, G.: Angularly
resolved elastic scattering from airborne particles, in: Optics of
Biological Particles, Springer, 31–61, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Korte, L. F., Brummer, G.-J. A., van der Does, M., Guerreiro, C. V., Hennekam, R., van Hateren, J. A., Jong, D., Munday, C. I., Schouten, S., and Stuut, J.-B. W.: Downward particle fluxes of biogenic matter and Saharan dust across the equatorial North Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6023–6040, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6023-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6023-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Lakowicz, J. R.: Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy, Springer Science
&amp; Business Media, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Wang, Z., Liu, Z., Winker, D., and Trepte, C.: A height resolved
global view of dust aerosols from the first year CALIPSO lidar measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009776, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Taylor, J. W., Crosier, J., Marsden, N., Bower, K. N., Lloyd, G., Ryder, C. L., Brooke, J. K., Cotton, R., Marenco, F., Blyth, A., Cui, Z., Estelles, V., Gallagher, M., Coe, H., and Choularton, T. W.: Aircraft and ground measurements of dust aerosols over the west African coast in summer 2015 during ICE-D and AER-D, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3817–3838, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3817-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3817-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Maki, T., Furumoto, S., Asahi, Y., Lee, K. C., Watanabe, K., Aoki, K., Murakami, M., Tajiri, T., Hasegawa, H., Mashio, A., and Iwasaka, Y.: Long-range-transported bioaerosols captured in snow cover on Mount Tateyama, Japan: impacts of Asian-dust events on airborne bacterial dynamics relating to ice-nucleation activities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8155–8171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8155-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8155-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Marsden, N., Flynn, M. J., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., and Coe, H.: Evaluating the influence of laser wavelength and detection stage geometry on optical detection efficiency in a single-particle mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 6051–6068, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Marsden, N. A., Flynn, M. J., Allan, J. D., and Coe, H.: Online differentiation of mineral phase in aerosol particles by ion formation mechanism using a LAAP-TOF single-particle mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 195–213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-195-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-195-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Marsden, N. A., Ullrich, R., Möhler, O., Eriksen Hammer, S., Kandler, K., Cui, Z., Williams, P. I., Flynn, M. J., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., and Coe, H.: Mineralogy and mixing state of north African mineral dust by online single-particle mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2259–2281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2259-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2259-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
McFarland, A., O. C.: Characterization of Sierra-Anderson Model 321a mm Size
Selective Inlet for Hi-Vol Samplers, Air Quality Laboratory, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
McTainsh, G.: Dust concentrations and particle-size characteristics of an
intense dust haze event: inland delta region, Mali, West Africa, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1081–1090, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M.: The design of single particle laser mass spectrometers,
Mass Spec. Rev., 26, 150–165, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Patey, M. D., Achterberg, E. P., Rijkenberg, M. J., and Pearce, R.: Aerosol
time-series measurements over the tropical Northeast Atlantic Ocean: dust
sources, elemental composition and mineralogy, Mar. Chem., 174,
103–119, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Perez, L., Tobias, A., Querol, X., Künzli, N., Pey, J., Alastuey, A.,
Viana, M., Valero, N., González-Cabré, M., and Sunyer, J.: Coarse
particles from Saharan dust and daily mortality, Epidemiology, 19, 800–807,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Perring, A., Schwarz, J., Baumgardner, D., Hernandez, M., Spracklen, D.,
Heald, C., Gao, R., Kok, G., McMeeking, G., McQuaid, J., and Fahey, D. W.: Airborne
observations of regional variation in fluorescent aerosol across the United
States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 1153–1170, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Pöhlker, C., Huffman, J. A., and Pöschl, U.: Autofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols – fluorescent biomolecules and potential interferences, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 37–71, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-37-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-37-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Pope, F.: Pollen grains are efficient cloud condensation nuclei,
Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 044015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/044015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/044015</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Pratt, K. A. and Prather, K. A.: Mass spectrometry of atmospheric
aerosols – Recent developments and applications. Part II: On-line mass
spectrometry techniques, Mass Spec. Rev., 31, 17–48, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Pratt, K. A., DeMott, P. J., French, J. R., Wang, Z., Westphal, D. L.,
Heymsfield, A. J., Twohy, C. H., Prenni, A. J., and Prather, K. A.: In situ
detection of biological particles in cloud ice-crystals, Nat. Geosci.,
2, 398–401, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M.: Long-term measurements of the transport of African
mineral dust to the southeastern United States: Implications for regional
air quality, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 15917–15927, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M. and Lamb, P. J.: African droughts and dust transport to the
Caribbean: Climate change implications, Science, 302, 1024–1027, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Reinard, M. S. and Johnston, M. V.: Ion formation mechanism in laser
desorption ionization of individual nanoparticles, Journal of the
American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 19, 389–399, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, N. H., Allan, J. D., Huffman, J. A., Kaye, P. H., Foot, V. E., and Gallagher, M.: Cluster analysis of WIBS single-particle bioaerosol data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 337–347, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-337-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-337-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Ruske, S., Topping, D. O., Foot, V. E., Kaye, P. H., Stanley, W. R., Crawford, I., Morse, A. P., and Gallagher, M. W.: Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for classification of primary biological aerosol using a new UV-LIF spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 695–708, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-695-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-695-2017</a>, 2017.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Rypien, K. L.: African dust is an unlikely source of Aspergillus sydowii,
the causative agent of sea fan disease, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 367, 125–131, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Sands, D. C.,  Langhans, V. E., Scharen, A. L., and De Smet, G.: The association between
bacteria and rain and possible resultant meteorological implications, 148–152,
1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Sassen, K., DeMott, P. J., Prospero, J. M., and Poellot, M. R.: Saharan dust
storms and indirect aerosol effects on clouds: CRYSTAL-FACE results,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017371" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017371</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Savage, N. J., Krentz, C. E., Könemann, T., Han, T. T., Mainelis, G., Pöhlker, C., and Huffman, J. A.: Systematic characterization and fluorescence threshold strategies for the wideband integrated bioaerosol sensor (WIBS) using size-resolved biological and interfering particles, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4279–4302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4279-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4279-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, X., Ramisetty, R., Mohr, C., Huang, W., Leisner, T., and Saathoff, H.: Laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight mass spectrometer (LAAPTOF): performance, reference spectra and classification of atmospheric samples, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2325–2343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2325-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2325-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Steiner, A. L.,
Brooks, S. D., Deng, C., Thornton, D. C., Pendleton, M. W., and Bryant, V.:
Pollen as atmospheric cloud condensation nuclei, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3596–3602, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Sultan, B., Labadi, K., Guégan, J.-F., and Janicot, S.: Climate drives
the meningitis epidemics onset in West Africa, PLoS Medicine, 2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020006</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Toprak, E. and Schnaiter, M.: Fluorescent biological aerosol particles measured with the Waveband Integrated Bioaerosol Sensor WIBS-4: laboratory tests combined with a one year field study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 225–243, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-225-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-225-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Yamaguchi, N., Ichijo, T., Sakotani, A., Baba, T., and Nasu, M.: Global
dispersion of bacterial cells on Asian dust, Sci. Rep., 2, 525, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00525" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00525</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Yankofsky, S., Levin, Z., Bertold, T., and Sandlerman, N.: Some basic
characteristics of bacterial freezing nuclei, J. Appl. Meteorol., 20, 1013–1019, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Zawadowicz, M. A., Froyd, K. D., Perring, A. E., Murphy, D. M., Spracklen, D. V., Heald, C. L., Buseck, P. R., and Cziczo, D. J.: Model-measurement consistency and limits of bioaerosol abundance over the continental United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13859–13870, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13859-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13859-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, D., Wang, Z., Heymsfield, A., Fan, J., Liu, D., and Zhao, M.:
Quantifying the impact of dust on heterogeneous ice generation in midlevel supercooled stratiform clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052831,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
