<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>On the role of trend and variability in the hydroxyl radical (OH)<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> in the global methane budget</article-title><alt-title>OH changes and methane budget</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{OH changes and methane budget}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y. Zhao et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Yuanhong</given-names></name>
          <email>yuanhong.zhao@lsce.ipsl.fr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Saunois</surname><given-names>Marielle</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bousquet</surname><given-names>Philippe</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff12">
          <name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Xin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0605-6430</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Berchet</surname><given-names>Antoine</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6709-0125</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Hegglin</surname><given-names>Michaela I.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-9044</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Canadell</surname><given-names>Josep G.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8788-3218</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Jackson</surname><given-names>Robert B.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8846-7147</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Deushi</surname><given-names>Makoto</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0373-3918</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Jöckel</surname><given-names>Patrick</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8964-1394</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Kinnison</surname><given-names>Douglas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3418-0834</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Kirner</surname><given-names>Ole</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5668-6177</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9 aff10">
          <name><surname>Strode</surname><given-names>Sarah</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8103-1663</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Tilmes</surname><given-names>Simone</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6557-3569</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11">
          <name><surname>Dlugokencky</surname><given-names>Edward J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Bo</given-names></name>
          <email>bo.zheng@lsce.ipsl.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8344-3445</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE-IPSL
(CEA-CNRS-UVSQ),<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate,
Reading, RG6 6BB, United Kingdom</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Global Carbon Project, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Canberra,
Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Earth System Science, Woods Institute for the Environment, and Precourt Institute for Energy,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Meteorological Research Institute, 1-1 Nagamine, Tsukuba, Ibaraki,
305-0052, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Atmospheric Chemistry Observations and Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> 3090 Center Green Drive, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Steinbuch Centre for Computing, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology,
Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>GESTAR, Universities Space Research Association (USRA), Columbia,
MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>Global Monitoring Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory,
Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff12"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University
of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yuanhong Zhao (yuanhong.zhao@lsce.ipsl.fr) and Bo Zheng (bo.zheng@lsce.ipsl.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>November</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>21</issue>
      <fpage>13011</fpage><lpage>13022</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>March</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>24</day><month>April</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>August</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>September</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e304">Decadal trends and interannual variations in the hydroxyl radical (OH),
while poorly constrained at present, are critical for understanding the
observed evolution of atmospheric methane (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Through analyzing the
OH fields simulated by the model ensemble of the Chemistry–Climate Model
Initiative (CCMI), we find (1) the negative OH anomalies during the El
Niño years mainly corresponding to the enhanced carbon monoxide (CO)
emissions from biomass burning and (2) a positive OH trend during 1980–2010
dominated by the elevated primary production and the reduced loss of OH due
to decreasing CO after 2000. Both two-box model inversions and variational
4D inversions suggest that ignoring the negative anomaly of OH during the El Niño years leads to a large overestimation of the increase in global
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions by up to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to match the observed
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increase over these years. Not accounting for the increasing OH
trends given by the CCMI models leads to an underestimation of the CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission increase by 23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1986 to 2010. The
variational-inversion-estimated CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions show that the tropical
regions contribute most to the uncertainties related to OH. This study
highlights the significant impact of climate and chemical feedbacks related
to OH on the top-down estimates of the global CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page13012?><p id="d1e409">Methane (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Earth's atmosphere is a major anthropogenic
greenhouse gas that has resulted in a 0.62 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> additional radiative
forcing from 1750 to 2011 (Etminan et al., 2016). The tropospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratio has more than doubled between the preindustrial period and the present
day, mainly attributed to increasing anthropogenic CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
(Etheridge et al., 1998; Turner et al., 2019). Although the centennial and
interdecadal trends and the drivers of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> growth are fairly clear, it
is still challenging to understand the trends and the associated interannual
variations on a timescale of 1–30 years. For example, the mysterious
stagnation in CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios during 2000–2007 (Dlugokencky, 2020) is still under debate, highlighting the need for closing
gaps in the global CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget on decadal timescales (e.g., Turner et
al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e479">One of the barriers to understanding atmospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes is the
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sink, which is mainly the chemical reaction with the hydroxyl
radical (OH; Saunois et al., 2016, 2017, 2020; Zhao et al., 2020) that
determines the tropospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime. The burden of atmospheric OH
is determined by complex and coupled atmospheric chemical cycles influenced
by anthropogenic and natural emissions of multiple atmospheric reactive
species and also by climate change (Murray et al., 2013; Turner et al.,
2018; Nicely et al., 2018), making it difficult to diagnose OH temporal
changes from a single process. The OH source mainly includes the primary
production from the reaction of excited oxygen atoms (O(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D)) with water
vapor (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) and the secondary production mainly from the reaction of
nitrogen oxide (NO) or ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) with hydroperoxyl radicals (HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
or organic peroxy radicals (RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The OH sinks mainly include the
reaction of OH with carbon monoxide (CO), CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, or nonmethane volatile
organic compounds (NMVOCs).</p>
      <p id="d1e564">Based on inversions of 1,1,1-trichloroethane (methyl chloroform, MCF) atmospheric observations,
some previous studies have attributed part of the observed CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes
to the temporal variation in OH concentrations ([OH]) but report large
uncertainties in their estimates (McNorton et al., 2016; Rigby et al., 2008,
2017; Turner et al., 2017). Such proxy approaches based on MCF inversions
also have limitations in their accuracy, due to both uncertainties in MCF
emissions before the 1990s and the weakening of interhemispheric MCF
gradients after the 1990s (Krol et al., 2003; Bousquet et al., 2005; Montzka
et al., 2011; Prather and Holmes, 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e576">The OH variations have been explored with atmospheric chemistry models in
terms of climate change (Nicely et al., 2018), anthropogenic emissions
(Gaubert et al., 2017), and lightning NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Murray et al.,
2013; Turner et al., 2018). The El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) has
proven to influence [OH] by perturbing CO emissions from biomass burning
(Rowlinson et al., 2019) and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from lightning (Turner et
al., 2018), but the detailed mechanisms behind present OH variations and
their impact on the CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget remain poorly understood. Nguyen et
al. (2020) estimated the impact of the chemical feedback induced by CO and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes on the top-down estimates of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions using a box
model approach. However, they account neither for the heterogeneous
distribution of atmospheric reactive species in space nor for the chemical
feedback related to OH production processes that vary over time.
Understanding the influences of the chemical feedback related to OH on
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions as estimated by atmospheric inversions is urgently needed
and can benefit from better incorporating 3D simulations from atmospheric
chemistry models.</p>
      <p id="d1e635">Here we continue our former studies (Zhao et al., 2019, 2020), in which we
have quantified the impact of OH on top-down estimates of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
during the 2000s. This work aims to better understand the production and
loss processes of OH and quantitatively assess their influence on the
temporal changes in the CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime and the global CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget on
a decadal scale since the 1980s. We first analyze the trends and year-to-year
variations in nine independent OH fields covering the period of 1980–2010
simulated by phase 1 of the International Global Atmospheric Chemistry
(IGAC) Stratosphere–Troposphere Processes and their Role in Climate (SPARC)
Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) models (Hegglin and
Lamarque, 2015; Morgenstern et al., 2017) and then assess the contribution
of different chemical processes to the OH budget by quantifying the main OH
production and loss processes. We finally derive the impact of OH
year-to-year variations and trends on the top-down estimation of global
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions between 1986 and 2010. Two-box model inversions and the
variational 4D inversions are both used to assess how the nonlinear chemical
feedback related to OH influences our understanding of the trends and
drivers of the global CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Method</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>CCMI OH fields</title>
      <p id="d1e698">In this study, we analyze the OH fields simulated by five models
(CESM1 CAM4-chem, CESM1 WACCM, EMAC-L90MA, GEOSCCM, MRI-ESM1r1), which
include detailed tropospheric ozone chemistry and multiple primary VOC
emissions. All five models conducted the REF-C1 experiments (free-running
simulations driven by state-of-the-art historical forcings including sea
surface temperature and sea ice concentrations) for 1960–2010, and four of
them (excluding GEOSCCM) conducted the REF-C1SD experiments (similar to
REF-C1 but nudged to the reanalysis meteorology data) for 1980–2010. Thus,
we have nine OH fields generated by models with different chemistry,
physics, and dynamics covering the period 1980–2010. A detailed description
of these CCMI models and experiments and of characteristics of the OH fields can
be found in Morgenstern et al. (2017) and Zhao et al. (2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e701">To eliminate the influence of different magnitudes of global OH burden
simulated by those models, we scale all OH fields to the same CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss
for the year 2000 based on the reaction with OH used in the TransCom-CH4
intercomparison exercise (Patra et al., 2011). The inferred global mean
scaling factors are calculated for the year 2000 and each<?pagebreak page13013?> OH field and then
applied to the whole period (1980–2010). The production
(O(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and loss
processes (removal of OH by CO, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, formaldehyde – CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and
isoprene) for each OH field are estimated using the CCMI database (Sect. S1 in the Supplement). For each OH field, we separate trends and year-to-year variations in
the global tropospheric mean CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-reaction-weighted OH concentration
([OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, weighting factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction rate of OH with CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dry air mass; Lawrence et al., 2001) as well as in its
production and loss rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Atmospheric inversion systems</title>
      <p id="d1e844">To evaluate the influences of OH temporal variations on the top-down
estimation of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, we have conducted Bayesian atmospheric
inversions using (1) a two-box model similar to that described by Turner et
al. (2017) and (2) a 4D variational inversion system based on the version
LMDz5B of the LMDz atmospheric transport model under the PYVAR-SACS
framework (Chevallier et al., 2007; Pison et al., 2009) as described by
Locatelli et al. (2015) and Zhao et al. (2020). The two-box model inversions
allow us to easily conduct multiple long-term global-scale inversions
(1984–2012) with each of the nine OH fields to estimate the global CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission variations caused by various OH fields. The 4D variational
inversions allow us to better represent the atmospheric transport, account
for the variation in meteorological conditions, and address regional
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission distributions. Thus, we have conducted both two-box model
inversions with each of the nine OH fields and variational inversions with
the multimodel mean OH field (average of the nine OH fields).</p>
      <p id="d1e874">Both the box model and the variational inversions optimize the CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions and initial mixing ratios by assimilating the observation data
from the Earth System Research Laboratory of the US National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (Dlugokencky, 2020). The OH
concentrations are prescribed and not optimized in both inversion systems. A
detailed description of the two-box model, the LMDz atmospheric transport
model, and the variational inversion method used here is provided in the
Supplement (Sect. S2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Ensemble of different inversions</title>
      <p id="d1e894">We have designed an ensemble of inversion experiments as listed in Table 1
using the two-box model with each OH field. Here, Inv_OH_std uses the aforementioned scaled OH fields;
Inv_OH_cli uses a climatology of each OH
field, which is constant over the years and correspond to an average over
1980–2010; Inv_OH_var stands for the inversion
using the detrended OH (only keeping the year-to-year variations);
Inv_OH_trend uses the OH without the
year-to-year variability (retaining only the trend). By comparing
Inv_OH_cli with Inv_OH_std, Inv_OH_var, and
Inv_OH_trend, it is possible to assess the
influence of total OH temporal changes, year-to-year variations, and OH
trends, respectively, on the overall CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes. The box model
inversions are conducted from 1984 to 2012 (2010 OH fields are used for 2011
and 2012). The first and last 2 years are treated as spin-up and
spin-down, and we only analyze the inversion results over 1986–2010.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e909">Two-box model inversion experiments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.97}[.97]?><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Inversion</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OH variability</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">experiments</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Inv_OH_std</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Full temporal changes (scaled OH fields)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Inv_OH_cli</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Climatology OH (average of 1980–2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Inv_OH_var</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Year-to-year variation only (detrend OH fields)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Inv_OH_trend</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Trend only (remove OH year-to-year variation)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e980">We have conducted two 4D variational inversions, Inv_OH_std and Inv_OH_cli, using
the multimodel mean OH field to test the influence of OH temporal
variations on the top-down estimates of global to regional CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions. The LMDz inversions are conducted for four time periods
(1994–1997, 1996–1999, 2000–2004, and 2006–2010; Sect. 3.4). We only
spin-up and spin-down the 4D variational inversions for 1 year to save
computing time. The four time periods are chosen to represent the transition
from La Niña (1995–1996) to El Niño (1997–1998) years and the years
of stagnated (2001–2003) and renewed growth (2007–2009) of observed
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Decadal OH trends and year-to-year variability</title>
      <p id="d1e1017">All CCMI models simulate positive OH trends from 1980 to 2010 after removing
the year-to-year variability (Fig. 1a), consistent with previous
analyses of CCMI OH fields (Zhao et al., 2019; Nicely et al., 2020) and
model results of the Aerosol Chemistry Model Intercomparison Project
(Stevenson et al., 2020). The multimodel mean [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by
0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1980 to 2010. The growth rates in
[OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are estimated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.3 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the early
1980s, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.1 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) between the mid-1980s and the late 1990s, and
0.03–0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.3 %–0.5 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) since the 2000s. This continuous increase in [OH] is different
from the results based on the MCF inversions using the two-box model
approach (Turner et al., 2017; Rigby et al., 2017), which yield increases in
[OH] from the 1990s to the early 2000s and a decrease in OH
afterward.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1237"><bold>(a)</bold> Annual global tropospheric mean OH concentration
([OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction weighted) with year-to-year variations
removed (represents the OH trend) simulated by CCMI models. The black line
is the multimodel mean, and associated error bars are standard deviations of
different model results (also for panel <bold>b</bold>). <bold>(b)</bold> Anomaly
of detrended and deseasonalized monthly mean [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (represents the
year-to-year variations in OH). Red bars indicate that the multimodel-simulated [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has statistically significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05)
positive anomalies; blue bars indicate statistically significant negative
anomalies; and grey bars indicate statistically nonsignificant anomalies.
<bold>(c)</bold> Bimonthly Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI.v2, 2020).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/13011/2020/acp-20-13011-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1320">The ensemble of the anomaly of detrended [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1b) shows a strong anticorrelation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the bimonthly
Multivariate ENSO Index Version 2 (MEI.v2, 2020; Fig. 1c and
Sect. S3; Zhang et al., 2019), with higher [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during La
Niña and lower [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during El Niño. From 1980 to 2010,
the<?pagebreak page13014?> CCMI model simulations show several negative anomalies of
[OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the three largest reaching as high as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 %) during 1982–1983 and
1991–1992 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 %) during 1997–1998. The negative [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies
during 1982–1983 and 1997–1998 correspond to the two strongest El Niño
events (MEI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5). During 1991–1992, the negative [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
anomaly corresponds to both the weaker El Niño event (MEI up to 2.0),
and the eruption of Mount Pinatubo. During other weak El Niño events
(1986–1987, 2002–2003, 2004–2005, and 2006–2007), the multimodel mean
[OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shows smaller negative anomalies of 1 %–2 %. Only the
negative OH anomaly during 2006–2007 (2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %) is simulated by all
models during the four weak El Niño events. The negative anomalies are
consistent with an up to 9 % reduction in [OH] during 1997–1998 simulated
by TOMCAT-GLOMAP as shown by Rowlinson et al. (2019), as well as with a 5 %
reduction in [OH] over tropical regions during 1991–1993 constrained by MCF
observations (Bousquet et al., 2006). During La Niña events, the
[OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % positive anomalies, resulting in
more than a 6 % increase in OH (max–min) during 1983–1985, 1992–1994, and
1998–2000.</p>
      <p id="d1e1595">The negative [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies during strong El Niño events
correspond to the highest growth rates of the CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio from the
surface observations (Dlugokencky, 2020), which are 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 ppbv yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1991 and 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 ppbv yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1998 (Fig. S1).
The positive anomalies of [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GM-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during La Niña events
correspond to a much smaller CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> growth (e.g., 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 ppbv yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1993 and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 ppbv yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1999) compared with that
during the adjacent El Niño years (Fig. S1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Factors controlling OH trends and year-to-year variability</title>
      <p id="d1e1728">The changes in tropospheric [OH] are due to changes in the balance of
production and loss. Here we assess the drivers of OH year-to-year
variations and trend by calculating the OH production and loss processes
listed in Table 2 following Murray et al. (2013, 2014) and Lelieveld et al. (2016). The multimodel calculated OH production and loss in the troposphere
averaged over 1980–2010 is 209 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, similar to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reported by Murray et al. (2014). Of the
total OH production, 46 % (96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is from primary
production (O(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O). Two main secondary productions of
NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> account for 30 % (63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 13 % (26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. For the OH
loss, reactions with CO and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> account for 39 % (82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 15 % (32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. We have
also calculated the OH loss by reactions with isoprene (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
formaldehyde (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O), which both remove 6 % of OH, reflecting the
influences of NMVOCs from natural and anthropogenic sources, respectively.
Besides, there are 12 % of OH production and 33 % of OH loss not
analyzed here due to lack of data in the CCMI model outputs (e.g., output of
OH loss due to reaction with NMVOCs included in different models).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1969">Multimodel mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation (SD) of annual total OH
production (P) and loss (L) in teramoles per year and percentage contribution
of each production and loss process to total OH production and loss
estimated with multimodel mean OH fields<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chemical reaction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">%</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Production</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">209 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">46 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Other</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Loss<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">209 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Isoprene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Other</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1988"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The OH production and loss of the EMAC model are not included in the table since total OH production and loss are not given by the EMAC model.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2357">Annual total OH tendency (Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from chemical reactions
with respect to the year 1980 with year-to-year variations removed. The
positive and negative tendencies represent OH production <bold>(a)</bold> and loss processes <bold>(b)</bold>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/13011/2020/acp-20-13011-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2385">Figure 2 shows the changes in the trends of OH production and loss processes
(year-to-year variations are removed) with respect to the year 1980. The OH
primary production (O(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) shows a large increase of
10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1980 to 2010, as the dominant driver of the
positive OH trend. The increase in OH primary production is due to an
increase in both tropospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden (producing O(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D)) and
water vapor (Dentener et al., 2003; Zhao et al., 2019; Nicely et al., 2020).
The OH loss from CO increased by 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1980 to
2001 but then decreased by 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 2001 to 2010. The
negative trend of CO simulated by CCMI models during 2000–2010 is consistent
with MOPITT observations over most of the regions<?pagebreak page13015?> (Strode et al., 2016). We
find that the decrease in OH loss by CO can explain the accelerated OH
increase after 2000, despite a stagnated OH primary production and a slight
decrease in the OH secondary production. The OH loss by CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
shows a continuous increase of 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1980 to
2010, buffers the increase in OH production by NO (5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The OH production by O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH loss by
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and isoprene show smaller changes of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1,
2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3, and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,
during 1980–2010. By comparing the magnitude of the production and loss
processes, we conclude that an enhanced OH primary production and changes in
OH loss by CO are the most important factors leading to the increased OH
trend inferred from CCMI models from 1980 to 2010.</p>
      <p id="d1e2601">Figures 3 and S2 show the year-to-year variations in the global total OH
production and loss due to several processes (calculated after trends have
been removed). Year-to-year variations in global [OH] are mainly determined
by the primary (O(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) and secondary
(NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) production and by OH loss due to CO (Fig. 3). Other
OH loss processes, including reactions with CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and
isoprene, show much smaller year-to-year variations but larger uncertainties
(Fig. S2), revealing a larger model spread for these processes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2687">Anomaly of the detrended annual global total OH tendency from
reactions O(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH. Black lines are multimodel means, and the error bars are the
standard deviations of all CCMI model results. The red, blue, and grey dots
and error bars show statistically significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05) positive
anomalies, negative anomalies, and statistically nonsignificant anomalies,
respectively. Shaded areas represent the El Niño years with more than 5 months of MEI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/13011/2020/acp-20-13011-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2787">As shown in Fig. 3, negative anomalies of [OH] during El Niño events are
dominated by increased OH loss through the reaction with CO in response to
enhanced biomass burning (Fig. S3), which is similar to the conclusions of Rowlinson
et al. (2019) and Nicely et al. (2020). During the strong El Niño events
in 1982–1983, 1991–1992, and 1997–1998, the OH loss by CO increased by up to
3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4, 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6, and 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, compared to the mean value of 1980–2010. The
increase in OH loss by CO can be partly<?pagebreak page13016?> offset by an increase in OH
production. Indeed, in 1998, the OH primary production
(O(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O), OH produced by NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7, 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5, and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, offsetting most of
the OH loss increase. The increase in OH primary production is mainly due to
an increase in tropospheric water vapor and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden during El
Niño events (Figs. S3 and S12 in Nicely et al., 2020), while the increase
in OH secondary production is caused by enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Fig. S3)
and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (Nicely et al., 2020) related to biomass burning as
well as to more HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation by CO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH. As a result, the OH year-to-year
variations found here are much smaller than those estimated by Nguyen et al. (2020), who mainly considered the response of OH to enhanced CO emissions
during the El Niño events. The positive anomaly in OH primary production
(0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is not significant during the 1991–1992 El
Niño event, maybe due to the absorption of ultraviolet (UV) radiation by volcanic
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and scattering of UV radiation by sulfate aerosols as well as to the reduction in tropospheric water vapor after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo (Bândă
et al., 2016; Soden et al., 2002). Thus, the negative [OH] anomaly during
the weak El Niño event in 1991–1992 is potentially being enhanced by the
eruption of Mount Pinatubo. Previous studies have shown that NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions from lightning can contribute to the OH interannual variability
(Murray et al., 2013; Turner et al., 2018). In addition, soil NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions depend on temperature and soil humidity (Yienger and Levy, 1995),
which vary during the El Niño events. The year-to-year variations in
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from lightning show large differences among CCMI models
(Fig. S4), and only EMAC and GEOSCCM apply interactive soil NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions that vary with meteorology conditions (Morgenstern et al., 2017)
based on Yienger and Levy (1995). Thus NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from lightning and
soil mainly contribute to intermodel differences instead of showing a
consistent response to El Niño.</p>
      <p id="d1e3038">Using a machine learning method, Nicely et al. (2020) attributed the
positive [OH] trend simulated by the CCMI models mainly to the increase in
tropospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, J(O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D), NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and attributed
[OH] interannual variations to CO changes. Overall, the explanations of the
drivers of OH year-to-year variations and trends found in our process
analysis are broadly consistent with those reported by Nicely et al. (2020),
and we emphasize that the decrease in CO emissions and concentrations after
2000 (Zheng et al., 2019) is important for determining the accelerated
positive OH trend.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Impact of OH variation on the top-down estimation of CH${}_{{4}}$ budget}?><title>Impact of OH variation on the top-down estimation of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget</title>
      <p id="d1e3095">Figure 4a shows the anomaly of global total CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions estimated by
inv_OH_std (nine scaled OH fields; orange
line) and inv_OH_cli (nine climatological OH;
blue line) using the two-box model during 1986–2010. With the climatological
OH fields (blue line), the top-down-estimated CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions show no
clear trend before 2005, with large positive anomalies during strong El
Niño years. There are two peaks of positive CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission anomalies
during this period: 10 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1991 and 14 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1998. From
2005 to 2008, the CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions show a large increase of 26 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions averaged over 2006–2010 are 20 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
higher than over 2000–2005, consistent with the 17–22 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated by
an ensemble of inversions in Kirschke et al. (2013).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3206"><bold>(a)</bold> Anomaly of global total CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions using scaled CCMI OH fields (orange line, Inv_OH_std), and climatological OH (blue, Inv_OH_cli) estimated by a two-box model inversion. The anomalies are calculated by comparison with the climatological mean CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions of Inv_OH_cli over 1986–2010. <bold>(b–d)</bold> Influences of <bold>(b)</bold> total OH temporal variations (OH year-to-year variation and trend, Inv_OH_std minus Inv_OH_cli), <bold>(c)</bold> OH year-to-year variations (Inv_OH_var minus Inv_OH_cli), and <bold>(d)</bold> OH trend
(Inv_OH_trend minus Inv_OH_cli) on box-model-estimated global total CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions. The black lines are the mean of inversion results with different
OH fields, and the boxes are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 standard deviation. The boxes with
filled blue and red show OH leads to statistically significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05)
differences between the two inversions.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/13011/2020/acp-20-13011-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3278">The OH temporal variations are found to largely influence the interannual
changes in top-down-estimated CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (orange line of Fig. 4a),
with differences between the two inversions reaching up to more than 15 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4b). The contributions from the OH year-to-year variations
and trends are also shown in Fig. 4. The negative anomalies of OH during El
Niño years reduce the unusually high top-down-estimated CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions in 1991–1992 by 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and in 1998 by 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4c). As a result, the high-emission peaks to match the
observed CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing-ratio growth in 1991 (14 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 1998
(12 ppbv yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), as estimated using the climatological OH, are largely
reduced.</p>
      <?pagebreak page13017?><p id="d1e3384"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The identified positive OH trend leads to an additional 23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from 1986 to 2010 (Fig. 4d).
During 1986–2005, the mean CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, as estimated with the scaled
OH, show a positive trend of 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05).
Increased CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions offset the increase in the OH sink to match the
observations. From 2005 to 2008, in contrast to previous studies, which
attribute the increased observed CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios to decreased OH
based on MCF inversions (Turner et al., 2017; Rigby et al., 2017), the
increasing OH trend simulated by CCMI models results in an additional
5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission increase in the inversion to match
the observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e3506">We compare the inversion using the two-box model (“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>” in Fig. 5) with the
results from the variational approach (bars in Fig. 5), using the multimodel
mean OH field, to evaluate the performance of the simplified two-box model
inversions. Despite the limitations inherent to two-box model inversions,
such as treatment of interhemispheric transport, stratospheric loss, and
the impact of spatial variability (Naus et al., 2019), the two-box model
inversion estimates similar temporal changes in CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and
losses compared to the variational approach for the four periods, as well as
to their response to OH changes (Fig. 5), on a global scale. Such comparisons
reinforce the reliability of the conclusions made from the two-box model
inversions regarding changes in the global total CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3536">Anomaly of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and losses estimated by variational
4D inversions (bars) and by two-box model inversions (“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>”) using a
multimodel mean scaled OH (Inv_OH_std, <bold>a</bold>)
and climatological OH <bold>(b)</bold> during four time periods. The anomalies are
calculated by comparison with the mean CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions of Inv_OH_cli over the four time periods (494 Tg). The total emissions
and loss over southern extratropical regions (90–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), the tropics (30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), the northern temperate regions
(30–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), and the northern boreal regions (60–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) are shown by different colors within each bar.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/13011/2020/acp-20-13011-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3622">The variational inversions allow us to assess the regional contribution of
the drivers to observed atmospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing-ratio changes. Here, as
a synthesis, we focus on four latitude bands (Fig. 5 and Table S2), including
the southern extratropical regions (90–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), the
tropical regions (30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), and the northern
temperate (30–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and boreal (60–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) regions. On average, OH over the tropical and northern
temperate regions removes 74 % and 14 % of global total atmospheric
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e3689">Between the periods 1995–1996 and 1997–1998, if one does not consider the OH
temporal variations (Inv_OH_cli), the CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
loss by OH shows a slight increase of 2 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> due to an increase in
atmospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios. The main driver of observed atmospheric
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing-ratio changes is the 10 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions over the tropics and the 7 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> increase over the northern
temperate regions (Fig. 5b and Table S2). When the multimodel
mean OH temporal variations are included (Inv_OH_std), the negative anomaly of OH in 1997–1998 leads to a 9 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease in CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss in 1997–1998 compared to 1995–1996, of
which 7 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (78 %) is contributed by the tropical regions (Fig. 5a). As a result, the decrease in CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss by OH
contributes a bit more to match the observed CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing-ratio increase
during the El Niño periods than the changes in CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (a
global increase of 8 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The emission increases from 1995–1996 to
1997–1998 over the tropics, and the northern temperate regions are reduced to
3 and 5 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5a, Inv_OH_std), respectively, which is similar to the inversion results given
by Bousquet et al. (2006).</p>
      <p id="d1e3851">From the period 2001–2003 to 2007–2009, positive OH trends lead to a 13 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in the CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss, of which 10 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (76 %) originates from the tropics (Inv_OH_std, Fig. 5a). In response to increased CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> losses, the
increase in optimized emissions over tropical regions (16 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Inv_OH_std) is more than twice that of the
inversion using climatological OH (7 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Inv_OH_ cli). The emission increases during the two periods over
the northern region show a smaller change of 2 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (12 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated by Inv_OH_std versus 10 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by Inv_OH_cli, Fig. 5). The
variational inversions show that the OH temporal variations are most
critical for top-down estimates of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets over the tropical
regions since OH over tropical regions shows larger interannual variations
and trends than middle- to high-latitude regions (Fig. S5) and most of the
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (74 %) is removed from the atmosphere by OH over the tropical
regions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusion and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e3984">Based on the simulations from the CCMI, we explore the response of OH fields
to changes in climate and anthropogenic and natural emissions and their impact
on the top-down estimates of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions during 1980–2010 based on a
model perspective. We find that although CCMI models<?pagebreak page13018?> simulated rather
different global total burdens of OH (Zhao et al., 2019), they show very
similar patterns in temporal variations, including (1) negative anomalies
during El Niño years, which are mainly driven by an elevated OH loss by
reaction with CO from enhanced biomass burning, despite a partial buffering
through enhanced OH production, and (2) a continuous increase in OH from
1980, which is mostly contributed by OH primary production, and acceleration
after 2000 due to reduced CO emissions. By conducting inversions using a
two-box model and a variational approach together with the ensemble of CCMI
OH fields, we find that (1) the OH year-to-year variations can largely
reduce the CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission increase (by up to 10 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) needed to
match the observed CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increase during El Niño years and (2) the
positive OH trend results in a 23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> additional increase in
optimized emissions from 1986 to 2010 compared to the inversions using
constant OH. The variational inversions also show that OH temporal
variations mainly influence top-down estimates of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over
tropical regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e4055">The responses of OH to changes in biomass burning, ozone, water vapor, and
lightning NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions during El Niño years have been recognized
by previous studies (Holmes et al., 2013; Murray et al., 2014; Turner et
al., 2018; Rowlinson et al., 2019; Nguyen et al., 2020). Here, the
consistent temporal variations in CCMI OH fields increase our confidence in
the model-simulated response of OH to ENSO as a result of several nonlinear
chemical processes. We estimated that the negative OH anomaly in 1998
reduces the high top-down-estimated CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions by 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 % smaller than the reduction estimated by
Butler et al. (2005; 16 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which only includes the OH reduction
response to enhanced biomass burning CO emissions. The smaller CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission reduction (OH anomaly) estimated with CCMI OH fields may reflect
the significance of considering multiple chemical processes as included in
the 3D atmospheric chemistry model in capturing OH variations and inverting
for CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. One of the largest uncertainties is NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions from lightning, which have been proven to contribute to
year-to-year variations in OH (Murray et al., 2013; Turner et al., 2018)
but here show a large spread among CCMI models. In addition, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions from soil may also change during El Niño years. Improving
estimates of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from lightning based on satellite
observations (Murray et al., 2013) and a better representation of the
interactive NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from the soil are critical for improving the
model simulation of OH temporal variability and for top-down estimates of
year-to-year variations in CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e4179">The positive trend of OH after the mid-2000s, which results in enhanced
top-down-estimated CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over the tropics, is opposite to those
constrained by MCF inversions (Turner et al., 2017; Rigby et al., 2017). The
processes that control the model-simulated positive OH trend discussed in
this study are supported by current studies based on observations, including
decreased CO emissions (Zheng et al., 2019), small variations in global
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Miyazaki et al., 2017), and an increase in tropospheric
ozone (Ziemke et al., 2019) and water vapor (Chung et al., 2014). However,
the CCMI models still show biases that are related to OH production and
loss. For example, these include an underestimation of CO especially over
the Northern Hemisphere compared with the surface and satellite observations
(Naik et al., 2013; Strode et al., 2016) and bias in the atmospheric total
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column (Zhao et al., 2019). In addition, changes in aerosols (Tang et
al., 2003) and atmospheric circulation such as the Hadley cell expansion
(Nicely et al., 2018) are not discussed in this study. Given the
uncertainties in both the atmospheric chemistry model simulated (Naik et
al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2019) and MCF-constrained OH (Bousquet et al., 2005;
Prather and Holmes, 2017; Naus et al., 2019) and the large
discrepancy between the two methods, the OH trend after the mid-2000s
remains an open problem, and more effort is required in developing both methods to close
the gap.</p>
      <p id="d1e4209">The temporal variations in OH, which are generally not well constrained in
current top-down estimates of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, imply potential additional
uncertainties in the global CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget (Saunois et al., 2017; Zhao et
al., 2020). The tropical regions, where top-down-estimated CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions show the largest sensitivity to OH changes, represent more than
60 % of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions worldwide (Saunois et al., 2016). The tropical
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are dominated by wetland emissions, in which large
uncertainties exist in both bottom-up and top-down studies (Saunois et al.,
2016, 2017). The variational inversions using OH with temporal variations
attribute the observed rising CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> growth during El Niño to the
reduction in CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss instead of to enhanced emissions over the tropics,
which is consistent with process-based wetland models that estimated
wetland CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reductions at the beginning of the El Niño event
(Hodson et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2018). Also, the negative OH anomaly can
reduce the top-down-estimated biomass burning CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission spikes
during El Niño events, consistent with the conclusions given by Bousquet et al. (2006). Future climate projections show that the extreme El Niño events
will be more frequent under a warmer climate (Berner et al., 2020), which
may enhance the fluctuations in [OH]. Furthermore, the changes in
anthropogenic emissions, such as expected decreases in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions (Lamarque et al., 2013), can also affect the OH trends. Our
research emphasizes the importance of considering climate changes and
chemical feedbacks related to OH in future CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget research.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4317">The CCMI OH fields are available at the Centre for Environmental Data
Analysis (CEDA; <uri>http://data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/wcrp-ccmi/data/CCMI-1/output</uri>,
CEDA Archive, 2019; Hegglin and Lamarque, 2015), the Natural
Environment Research Council's Data Repository for Atmospheric Science and
Earth Observation. The CESM1 CAM4-Chem and CESM1 WACCM outputs for CCMI are available
at <uri>http://www.earthsystemgrid.org/</uri> (Climate Data Gateway at NCAR, 2019). The surface observations for CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4<?pagebreak page13019?></mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inversions are available at the World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases (<uri>https://gaw.kishou.go.jp/</uri>, WDCGG, 2019). Other datasets can
be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4338">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4347">YZ, BZ, MS, and PB designed the study, analyzed data, and wrote the
manuscript. AB developed the LMDz code for variational CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inversions.
XL helped with data preparation. JGC and RBJ provided input into the study
design and discussed the results. EJD provided the atmospheric in situ data.
MIH, MD, PJ, DK, OK, SS, and ST provided CCMI model outputs. All co-authors
commented on the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4362">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4368">This work benefited from the expertise of the Global Carbon Project methane
initiative.</p><p id="d1e4370">We acknowledge the modeling groups for making their simulations available
for this analysis, the joint WCRP SPARC–IGAC Chemistry–Climate Model
Initiative (CCMI) for organizing and coordinating the model simulations and
data analysis activity, and the British Atmospheric Data Centre (BADC) for
collecting and archiving the CCMI model output.</p><p id="d1e4372">The EMAC model simulations were performed at the German Climate
Computing Center (DKRZ) through support from the Bundesministerium für
Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). DKRZ and its scientific steering committee are
gratefully acknowledged for providing the high-performance computing and data-archiving resources
for the consortial project ESCiMo (Earth System Chemistry integrated
Modelling).</p><p id="d1e4374">Makoto Deushi was partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant no. JP19K12312.</p><p id="d1e4376">Yuanhong Zhao acknowledges helpful discussions with Zhen Zhang, Yilong Wang,
and Lin Zhang.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4381">This research has been supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (grant no. GBMF5439, “Advancing Understanding of the Global Methane Cycle”) and by JSPS KAKENHI (grant no. JP19K12312).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4387">This paper was edited by Martin Heimann and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bândă, N., Krol, M., van Weele, M., van Noije, T., Le Sager, P., and Röckmann, T.: Can we explain the observed methane variability after the Mount Pinatubo eruption?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 195–214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-195-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-195-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berner, J., Christensen, H. M., and Sardeshmukh, P. D.: Does ENSO Regularity
Increase in a Warming Climate?, J. Climate, 33,
1247–1259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-19-0545.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jcli-d-19-0545.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bousquet, P., Hauglustaine, D. A., Peylin, P., Carouge, C., and Ciais, P.: Two decades of OH variability as inferred by an inversion of atmospheric transport and chemistry of methyl chloroform, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2635–2656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2635-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2635-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Miller, J. B., Dlugokencky, E. J., Hauglustaine, D.
A., Prigent, C., Van der Werf, G. R., Peylin, P., Brunke, E. G., Carouge,
C., Langenfelds, R. L., Lathiere, J., Papa, F., Ramonet, M., Schmidt, M.,
Steele, L. P., Tyler, S. C., and White, J.: Contribution of anthropogenic
and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability, Nature, 443,
439–443, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature05132</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Butler, T. M., Rayner, P. J., Simmonds, I., and Lawrence, M. G.:
Simultaneous mass balance inverse modeling of methane and carbon monoxide,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D21310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005jd006071</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>CEDA Archive: CCMI-1 Data Archive, available at: <uri>http://data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/wcrp-ccmi/data/CCMI-1/output</uri>, last access: 20 December 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chevallier, F., Bréon, F.-M., and Rayner, P. J.: Contribution of the
Orbiting Carbon Observatory to the estimation of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources and sinks:
Theoretical study in a variational data assimilation framework, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D09307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007375" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007375</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chung, E.-S., Soden, B., Sohn, B. J., and Shi, L.: Upper-tropospheric
moistening in response to anthropogenic warming, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 11636–11641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409659111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1409659111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Climate Data Gateway at NCAR: Climate Data at the National
Center for Atmospheric Research, available at: <uri>https://www.earthsystemgrid.org/</uri>, last access: 15 December 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dentener, F., Peters, W., Krol, M., van Weele, M., Bergamaschi, P., and
Lelieveld, J.: Interannual variability and trend of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime as a
measure for OH changes in the 1979–1993 time period, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4442, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002916" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd002916</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dlugokencky, E.: NOAA/ESRL, available at: <uri>http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends_ch4/</uri>, last access: 20 January 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Etheridge, D. M., Steele, L. P., Francey, R. J., and Langenfelds, R. L.:
Atmospheric methane between 1000 A.D. and present: Evidence of anthropogenic
emissions and climatic variability, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 15979–15993, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd00923" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98jd00923</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Etminan, M., Myhre, G., Highwood, E. J., and Shine, K. P.: Radiative forcing
of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the
methane radiative forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 12614–12623,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071930" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL071930</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gaubert, B., Worden, H. M., Arellano, A. F. J., Emmons, L. K., Tilmes, S.,
Barré, J., Martinez Alonso, S., Vitt, F., Anderson, J. L., Alkemade, F.,
Houweling, S., and Edwards, D. P.: Chemical Feedback From Decreasing Carbon
Monoxide Emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 9985–9995, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl074987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017gl074987</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page13020?><ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hegglin, M. I. and Lamarque, J.-F.: The IGAC/SPARC Chemistry-Climate Model
Initiative Phase-1 (CCMI-1) model data output, NCAS British Atmospheric Data
Centre, available at: <uri>http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/9cc6b94df0f4469d8066d69b5df879d5</uri> (last
access: 15 December 2019), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hodson, E. L., Poulter, B., Zimmermann, N. E., Prigent, C., and Kaplan, J.
O.: The El Niño–Southern Oscillation and wetland methane interannual
variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L08810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl046861" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011gl046861</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Holmes, C. D., Prather, M. J., Søvde, O. A., and Myhre, G.: Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 285–302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-285-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-285-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirschke, S., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Saunois, M., Canadell, J. G.,
Dlugokencky, E. J., Bergamaschi, P., Bergmann, D., Blake, D. R., Bruhwiler,
L., Cameron-Smith, P., Castaldi, S., Chevallier, F., Feng, L., Fraser, A.,
Heimann, M., Hodson, E. L., Houweling, S., Josse, B., Fraser, P. J.,
Krummel, P. B., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R. L., Le Quéré, C.,
Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Palmer, P. I., Pison, I., Plummer, D., Poulter, B.,
Prinn, R. G., Rigby, M., Ringeval, B., Santini, M., Schmidt, M., Shindell,
D. T., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele, L. P., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K.,
Szopa, S., van der Werf, G. R., Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., Weiss, R.
F., Williams, J. E., and Zeng, G.: Three decades of global methane sources
and sinks, Nat. Geosci., 6, 813–823, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1955" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1955</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Krol, M. C., Lelieveld, J., Oram, D. E., Sturrock, G. A., Penkett, S. A.,
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Gros, V., Williams, J., and Scheeren, H. A.:
Continuing emissions of methyl chloroform from Europe, Nature, 421, 131–135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01311" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature01311</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lamarque, J.-F., Shindell, D. T., Josse, B., Young, P. J., Cionni, I., Eyring, V., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., Collins, W. J., Doherty, R., Dalsoren, S., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G., Ghan, S. J., Horowitz, L. W., Lee, Y. H., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., Naik, V., Plummer, D., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Schulz, M., Skeie, R. B., Stevenson, D. S., Strode, S., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., Voulgarakis, A., and Zeng, G.: The Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP): overview and description of models, simulations and climate diagnostics, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 179–206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-179-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-179-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lawrence, M. G., Jöckel, P., and von Kuhlmann, R.: What does the global mean OH concentration tell us?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 1, 37–49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-1-37-2001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-1-37-2001</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J., Gromov, S., Pozzer, A., and Taraborrelli, D.: Global tropospheric hydroxyl distribution, budget and reactivity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12477–12493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Locatelli, R., Bousquet, P., Hourdin, F., Saunois, M., Cozic, A., Couvreux, F., Grandpeix, J.-Y., Lefebvre, M.-P., Rio, C., Bergamaschi, P., Chambers, S. D., Karstens, U., Kazan, V., van der Laan, S., Meijer, H. A. J., Moncrieff, J., Ramonet, M., Scheeren, H. A., Schlosser, C., Schmidt, M., Vermeulen, A., and Williams, A. G.: Atmospheric transport and chemistry of trace gases in LMDz5B: evaluation and implications for inverse modelling, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 129–150, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-129-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-129-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McNorton, J., Chipperfield, M. P., Gloor, M., Wilson, C., Feng, W., Hayman, G. D., Rigby, M., Krummel, P. B., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Weiss, R. F., Young, D., Dlugokencky, E., and Montzka, S. A.: Role of OH variability in the stalling of the global atmospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> growth rate from 1999 to 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7943–7956, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7943-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7943-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miyazaki, K., Eskes, H., Sudo, K., Boersma, K. F., Bowman, K., and Kanaya, Y.: Decadal changes in global surface NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from multi-constituent satellite data assimilation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 807–837, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-807-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-807-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Montzka, S. A., Krol, M., Dlugokencky, E., Hall, B., Jöckel, P., and
Lelieveld, J.: Small Interannual Variability of Global Atmospheric Hydroxyl,
Science, 331, 67–69, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197640" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1197640</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Morgenstern, O., Hegglin, M. I., Rozanov, E., O'Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Akiyoshi, H., Archibald, A. T., Bekki, S., Butchart, N., Chipperfield, M. P., Deushi, M., Dhomse, S. S., Garcia, R. R., Hardiman, S. C., Horowitz, L. W., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Kinnison, D., Lin, M., Mancini, E., Manyin, M. E., Marchand, M., Marécal, V., Michou, M., Oman, L. D., Pitari, G., Plummer, D. A., Revell, L. E., Saint-Martin, D., Schofield, R., Stenke, A., Stone, K., Sudo, K., Tanaka, T. Y., Tilmes, S., Yamashita, Y., Yoshida, K., and Zeng, G.: Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 639–671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-639-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-639-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Multivariate ENSO Index Version 2 (MEI.v2):
<uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/enso/mei/</uri>, last access: 20 January 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murray, L. T., Logan, J. A., and Jacob, D. J.: Interannual variability in
tropical tropospheric ozone and OH: The role of lightning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 11468–11480, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50857</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murray, L. T., Mickley, L. J., Kaplan, J. O., Sofen, E. D., Pfeiffer, M., and Alexander, B.: Factors controlling variability in the oxidative capacity of the troposphere since the Last Glacial Maximum, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3589–3622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3589-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3589-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Naik, V., Voulgarakis, A., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, M., Prather, M. J., Young, P. J., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P. J., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty, R., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G. A., Josse, B., Lee, Y. H., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., van Noije, T. P. C., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Skeie, R., Shindell, D. T., Stevenson, D. S., Strode, S., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng, G.: Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5277–5298, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5277-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5277-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Naus, S., Montzka, S. A., Pandey, S., Basu, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Krol, M.: Constraints and biases in a tropospheric two-box model of OH, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 407–424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-407-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-407-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nguyen, N. H., Turner, A. J., Yin, Y., Prather, M. J., and Frankenberg, C.:
Effects of Chemical Feedbacks on Decadal Methane Emissions Estimates,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085706, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl085706" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019gl085706</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page13021?><ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nicely, J. M., Canty, T. P., Manyin, M., Oman, L. D., Salawitch, R. J.,
Steenrod, S. D., Strahan, S. E., and Strode, S. A.: Changes in Global
Tropospheric OH Expected as a Result of Climate Change Over the Last Several
Decades, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 10774–10795,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028388" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD028388</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nicely, J. M., Duncan, B. N., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., Salawitch, R. J., Deushi, M., Haslerud, A. S., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Kinnison, D. E., Klekociuk, A., Manyin, M. E., Marécal, V., Morgenstern, O., Murray, L. T., Myhre, G., Oman, L. D., Pitari, G., Pozzer, A., Quaglia, I., Revell, L. E., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Stone, K., Strahan, S., Tilmes, S., Tost, H., Westervelt, D. M., and Zeng, G.: A machine learning examination of hydroxyl radical differences among model simulations for CCMI-1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1341–1361, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1341-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1341-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Patra, P. K., Houweling, S., Krol, M., Bousquet, P., Belikov, D., Bergmann, D., Bian, H., Cameron-Smith, P., Chipperfield, M. P., Corbin, K., Fortems-Cheiney, A., Fraser, A., Gloor, E., Hess, P., Ito, A., Kawa, S. R., Law, R. M., Loh, Z., Maksyutov, S., Meng, L., Palmer, P. I., Prinn, R. G., Rigby, M., Saito, R., and Wilson, C.: TransCom model simulations of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and related species: linking transport, surface flux and chemical loss with CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variability in the troposphere and lower stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12813–12837, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12813-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12813-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pison, I., Bousquet, P., Chevallier, F., Szopa, S., and Hauglustaine, D.: Multi-species inversion of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from surface measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5281–5297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5281-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5281-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prather, M. J. and Holmes, C. D.: Overexplaining or underexplaining
methane's role in climate change, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 114, 5324–5326, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704884114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1704884114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rigby, M., Prinn, R. G., Fraser, P. J., Simmonds, P. G., Langenfelds, R. L.,
Huang, J., Cunnold, D. M., Steele, L. P., Krummel, P. B., Weiss, R. F.,
O'Doherty, S., Salameh, P. K., Wang, H. J., Harth, C. M., Mühle, J., and
Porter, L. W.: Renewed growth of atmospheric methane, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L22805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl036037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008gl036037</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rigby, M., Montzka, S. A., Prinn, R. G., White, J. W. C., Young, D.,
O'Doherty, S., Lunt, M. F., Ganesan, A. L., Manning, A. J., Simmonds, P. G.,
Salameh, P. K., Harth, C. M., Muhle, J., Weiss, R. F., Fraser, P. J.,
Steele, L. P., Krummel, P. B., McCulloch, A., and Park, S.: Role of
atmospheric oxidation in recent methane growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
114, 5373–5377, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616426114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1616426114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rowlinson, M. J., Rap, A., Arnold, S. R., Pope, R. J., Chipperfield, M. P., McNorton, J., Forster, P., Gordon, H., Pringle, K. J., Feng, W., Kerridge, B. J., Latter, B. L., and Siddans, R.: Impact of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on the interannual variability of methane and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8669–8686, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8669-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8669-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Poulter, B., Peregon, A., Ciais, P., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etiope, G., Bastviken, D., Houweling, S., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Tubiello, F. N., Castaldi, S., Jackson, R. B., Alexe, M., Arora, V. K., Beerling, D. J., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Brovkin, V., Bruhwiler, L., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P., Covey, K., Curry, C., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Joos, F., Kim, H.-S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R., Locatelli, R., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., Marshall, J., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Patra, P. K., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Pison, I., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J., Saito, M., Santini, M., Schroeder, R., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele, P., Takizawa, A., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R., Wiedinmyer, C., Wilton, D. J., Wiltshire, A., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Xu, X., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, Q.: The global methane budget 2000–2012, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 697–751, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-8-697-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Poulter, B., Peregon, A., Ciais, P., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etiope, G., Bastviken, D., Houweling, S., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Tubiello, F. N., Castaldi, S., Jackson, R. B., Alexe, M., Arora, V. K., Beerling, D. J., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P., Covey, K., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Joos, F., Kim, H.-S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R., Locatelli, R., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Patra, P. K., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Pison, I., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J., Saito, M., Santini, M., Schroeder, R., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Takizawa, A., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., Weiss, R., Wilton, D. J., Wiltshire, A., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Xu, X., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, Q.: Variability and quasi-decadal changes in the methane budget over the period 2000–2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11135–11161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Raymond, P. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Houweling, S., Patra, P. K., Ciais, P., Arora, V. K., Bastviken, D., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Carlson, K. M., Carrol, M., Castaldi, S., Chandra, N., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P. M., Covey, K., Curry, C. L., Etiope, G., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Hegglin, M. I., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Hugelius, G., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Jensen, K. M., Joos, F., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., Laruelle, G. G., Liu, L., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., McNorton, J., Miller, P. A., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Müller, J., Murguia-Flores, F., Naik, V., Niwa, Y., Noce, S., O'Doherty, S., Parker, R. J., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Regnier, P., Riley, W. J., Rosentreter, J. A., Segers, A., Simpson, I. J., Shi, H., Smith, S. J., Steele, L. P., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Tubiello, F. N., Tsuruta, A., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., Weber, T. S., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R. F., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Yin, Y., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Zheng, B., Zhu, Q., Zhu, Q., and Zhuang, Q.: The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1561–1623, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soden, B. J., Wetherald, R. T., Stenchikov, G. L., and Robock, A.: Global
Cooling After the Eruption of Mount Pinatubo: A Test of Climate Feedback by
Water Vapor, Science, 296, 727–730, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.296.5568.727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.296.5568.727</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page13022?><ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stevenson, D. S., Zhao, A., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Tilmes, S., Zeng, G., Murray, L. T., Collins, W. J., Griffiths, P., Shim, S., Horowitz, L. W., Sentman, L., and Emmons, L.: Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-1219" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2019-1219</ext-link>, in review, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Strode, S. A., Worden, H. M., Damon, M., Douglass, A. R., Duncan, B. N., Emmons, L. K., Lamarque, J.-F., Manyin, M., Oman, L. D., Rodriguez, J. M., Strahan, S. E., and Tilmes, S.: Interpreting space-based trends in carbon monoxide with multiple models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7285–7294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7285-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7285-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tang, Y., Carmichael, G. R., Uno, I., Woo, J.-H., Kurata, G., Lefer, B.,
Shetter, R. E., Huang, H., Anderson, B. E., Avery, M. A., Clarke, A. D., and
Blake, D. R.: Impacts of aerosols and clouds on photolysis frequencies and
photochemistry during TRACE-P: 2. Three-dimensional study using a regional
chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108,
8822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd003100</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., Wennberg, P. O., and Jacob, D. J.: Ambiguity
in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 5367–5372, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616020114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1616020114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Turner, A. J., Fung, I., Naik, V., Horowitz, L. W., and Cohen, R. C.:
Modulation of hydroxyl variability by ENSO in the absence of external
forcing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 8931–8936, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807532115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1807532115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., and Kort, E. A.: Interpreting contemporary
trends in atmospheric methane, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 2805–2813, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1814297116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>WDCGG: The World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases, available at: <uri>https://gaw.kishou.go.jp/</uri>, last access: 10 December 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yienger, J. J. and Levy II, H.: Empirical model of global soil-biogenic
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100,
11447–11464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd00370" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95jd00370</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, T., Hoell, A., Perlwitz, J., Eischeid, J., Murray, D., Hoerling, M.,
and Hamill, T. M.: Towards Probabilistic Multivariate ENSO Monitoring,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 10532–10540, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl083946" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019gl083946</ext-link>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Z., Zimmermann, N. E., Calle, L., Hurtt, G., Chatterjee, A., and
Poulter, B.: Enhanced response of global wetland methane emissions to the
2015–2016 El Niño-Southern Oscillation event, Environ. Res.
Lett., 13, 074009, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac939" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aac939</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Lin, X., Berchet, A., Hegglin, M. I., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Hauglustaine, D. A., Szopa, S., Stavert, A. R., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Bekki, S., Deushi, M., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Kinnison, D., Kirner, O., Marécal, V., O'Connor, F. M., Plummer, D. A., Revell, L. E., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Strode, S., Tilmes, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Zheng, B.: Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13701–13723, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Lin, X., Berchet, A., Hegglin, M. I., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Dlugokencky, E. J., Langenfelds, R. L., Ramonet, M., Worthy, D., and Zheng, B.: Influences of hydroxyl radicals (OH) on top-down estimates of the global and regional methane budgets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9525–9546, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9525-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-9525-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zheng, B., Chevallier, F., Yin, Y., Ciais, P., Fortems-Cheiney, A., Deeter, M. N., Parker, R. J., Wang, Y., Worden, H. M., and Zhao, Y.: Global atmospheric carbon monoxide budget 2000–2017 inferred from multi-species atmospheric inversions, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1411–1436, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1411-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-11-1411-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ziemke, J. R., Oman, L. D., Strode, S. A., Douglass, A. R., Olsen, M. A., McPeters, R. D., Bhartia, P. K., Froidevaux, L., Labow, G. J., Witte, J. C., Thompson, A. M., Haffner, D. P., Kramarova, N. A., Frith, S. M., Huang, L.-K., Jaross, G. R., Seftor, C. J., Deland, M. T., and Taylor, S. L.: Trends in global tropospheric ozone inferred from a composite record of TOMS/OMI/MLS/OMPS satellite measurements and the MERRA-2 GMI simulation , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3257–3269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>On the role of trend and variability in the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the global methane budget</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Decadal trends and interannual variations in the hydroxyl radical (OH),
while poorly constrained at present, are critical for understanding the
observed evolution of atmospheric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>). Through analyzing the
OH fields simulated by the model ensemble of the Chemistry–Climate Model
Initiative (CCMI), we find (1) the negative OH anomalies during the El
Niño years mainly corresponding to the enhanced carbon monoxide (CO)
emissions from biomass burning and (2) a positive OH trend during 1980–2010
dominated by the elevated primary production and the reduced loss of OH due
to decreasing CO after 2000. Both two-box model inversions and variational
4D inversions suggest that ignoring the negative anomaly of OH during the El Niño years leads to a large overestimation of the increase in global
CH<sub>4</sub> emissions by up to 10&thinsp;±&thinsp;3&thinsp;Tg&thinsp;yr<sup>−1</sup> to match the observed
CH<sub>4</sub> increase over these years. Not accounting for the increasing OH
trends given by the CCMI models leads to an underestimation of the CH<sub>4</sub>
emission increase by 23&thinsp;±&thinsp;9&thinsp;Tg&thinsp;yr<sup>−1</sup> from 1986 to 2010. The
variational-inversion-estimated CH<sub>4</sub> emissions show that the tropical
regions contribute most to the uncertainties related to OH. This study
highlights the significant impact of climate and chemical feedbacks related
to OH on the top-down estimates of the global CH<sub>4</sub> budget.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Bândă, N., Krol, M., van Weele, M., van Noije, T., Le Sager, P., and Röckmann, T.: Can we explain the observed methane variability after the Mount Pinatubo eruption?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 195–214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-195-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-195-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Berner, J., Christensen, H. M., and Sardeshmukh, P. D.: Does ENSO Regularity
Increase in a Warming Climate?, J. Climate, 33,
1247–1259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-19-0545.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-19-0545.1</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bousquet, P., Hauglustaine, D. A., Peylin, P., Carouge, C., and Ciais, P.: Two decades of OH variability as inferred by an inversion of atmospheric transport and chemistry of methyl chloroform, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2635–2656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2635-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2635-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Miller, J. B., Dlugokencky, E. J., Hauglustaine, D.
A., Prigent, C., Van der Werf, G. R., Peylin, P., Brunke, E. G., Carouge,
C., Langenfelds, R. L., Lathiere, J., Papa, F., Ramonet, M., Schmidt, M.,
Steele, L. P., Tyler, S. C., and White, J.: Contribution of anthropogenic
and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability, Nature, 443,
439–443, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05132" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05132</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Butler, T. M., Rayner, P. J., Simmonds, I., and Lawrence, M. G.:
Simultaneous mass balance inverse modeling of methane and carbon monoxide,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D21310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006071</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
CEDA Archive: CCMI-1 Data Archive, available at: <a href="http://data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/wcrp-ccmi/data/CCMI-1/output" target="_blank"/>, last access: 20 December 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chevallier, F., Bréon, F.-M., and Rayner, P. J.: Contribution of the
Orbiting Carbon Observatory to the estimation of CO<sub>2</sub> sources and sinks:
Theoretical study in a variational data assimilation framework, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D09307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007375" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007375</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chung, E.-S., Soden, B., Sohn, B. J., and Shi, L.: Upper-tropospheric
moistening in response to anthropogenic warming, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 11636–11641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409659111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409659111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Climate Data Gateway at NCAR: Climate Data at the National
Center for Atmospheric Research, available at: <a href="https://www.earthsystemgrid.org/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 15 December 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Dentener, F., Peters, W., Krol, M., van Weele, M., Bergamaschi, P., and
Lelieveld, J.: Interannual variability and trend of CH<sub>4</sub> lifetime as a
measure for OH changes in the 1979–1993 time period, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4442, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002916" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002916</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dlugokencky, E.: NOAA/ESRL, available at: <a href="http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends_ch4/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 20 January 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Etheridge, D. M., Steele, L. P., Francey, R. J., and Langenfelds, R. L.:
Atmospheric methane between 1000 A.D. and present: Evidence of anthropogenic
emissions and climatic variability, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 15979–15993, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd00923" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd00923</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Etminan, M., Myhre, G., Highwood, E. J., and Shine, K. P.: Radiative forcing
of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the
methane radiative forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 12614–12623,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071930" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071930</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gaubert, B., Worden, H. M., Arellano, A. F. J., Emmons, L. K., Tilmes, S.,
Barré, J., Martinez Alonso, S., Vitt, F., Anderson, J. L., Alkemade, F.,
Houweling, S., and Edwards, D. P.: Chemical Feedback From Decreasing Carbon
Monoxide Emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 9985–9995, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl074987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl074987</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hegglin, M. I. and Lamarque, J.-F.: The IGAC/SPARC Chemistry-Climate Model
Initiative Phase-1 (CCMI-1) model data output, NCAS British Atmospheric Data
Centre, available at: <a href="http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/9cc6b94df0f4469d8066d69b5df879d5" target="_blank"/> (last
access: 15 December 2019), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hodson, E. L., Poulter, B., Zimmermann, N. E., Prigent, C., and Kaplan, J.
O.: The El Niño–Southern Oscillation and wetland methane interannual
variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L08810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl046861" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl046861</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, C. D., Prather, M. J., Søvde, O. A., and Myhre, G.: Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 285–302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-285-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-285-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Kirschke, S., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Saunois, M., Canadell, J. G.,
Dlugokencky, E. J., Bergamaschi, P., Bergmann, D., Blake, D. R., Bruhwiler,
L., Cameron-Smith, P., Castaldi, S., Chevallier, F., Feng, L., Fraser, A.,
Heimann, M., Hodson, E. L., Houweling, S., Josse, B., Fraser, P. J.,
Krummel, P. B., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R. L., Le Quéré, C.,
Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Palmer, P. I., Pison, I., Plummer, D., Poulter, B.,
Prinn, R. G., Rigby, M., Ringeval, B., Santini, M., Schmidt, M., Shindell,
D. T., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele, L. P., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K.,
Szopa, S., van der Werf, G. R., Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., Weiss, R.
F., Williams, J. E., and Zeng, G.: Three decades of global methane sources
and sinks, Nat. Geosci., 6, 813–823, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1955" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1955</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Krol, M. C., Lelieveld, J., Oram, D. E., Sturrock, G. A., Penkett, S. A.,
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Gros, V., Williams, J., and Scheeren, H. A.:
Continuing emissions of methyl chloroform from Europe, Nature, 421, 131–135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01311" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01311</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Lamarque, J.-F., Shindell, D. T., Josse, B., Young, P. J., Cionni, I., Eyring, V., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., Collins, W. J., Doherty, R., Dalsoren, S., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G., Ghan, S. J., Horowitz, L. W., Lee, Y. H., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., Naik, V., Plummer, D., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Schulz, M., Skeie, R. B., Stevenson, D. S., Strode, S., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., Voulgarakis, A., and Zeng, G.: The Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP): overview and description of models, simulations and climate diagnostics, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 179–206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-179-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-179-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Lawrence, M. G., Jöckel, P., and von Kuhlmann, R.: What does the global mean OH concentration tell us?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 1, 37–49, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-1-37-2001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-1-37-2001</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Lelieveld, J., Gromov, S., Pozzer, A., and Taraborrelli, D.: Global tropospheric hydroxyl distribution, budget and reactivity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12477–12493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Locatelli, R., Bousquet, P., Hourdin, F., Saunois, M., Cozic, A., Couvreux, F., Grandpeix, J.-Y., Lefebvre, M.-P., Rio, C., Bergamaschi, P., Chambers, S. D., Karstens, U., Kazan, V., van der Laan, S., Meijer, H. A. J., Moncrieff, J., Ramonet, M., Scheeren, H. A., Schlosser, C., Schmidt, M., Vermeulen, A., and Williams, A. G.: Atmospheric transport and chemistry of trace gases in LMDz5B: evaluation and implications for inverse modelling, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 129–150, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-129-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-129-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
McNorton, J., Chipperfield, M. P., Gloor, M., Wilson, C., Feng, W., Hayman, G. D., Rigby, M., Krummel, P. B., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Weiss, R. F., Young, D., Dlugokencky, E., and Montzka, S. A.: Role of OH variability in the stalling of the global atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> growth rate from 1999 to 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7943–7956, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7943-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7943-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Miyazaki, K., Eskes, H., Sudo, K., Boersma, K. F., Bowman, K., and Kanaya, Y.: Decadal changes in global surface NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions from multi-constituent satellite data assimilation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 807–837, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-807-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-807-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Montzka, S. A., Krol, M., Dlugokencky, E., Hall, B., Jöckel, P., and
Lelieveld, J.: Small Interannual Variability of Global Atmospheric Hydroxyl,
Science, 331, 67–69, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197640" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197640</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Morgenstern, O., Hegglin, M. I., Rozanov, E., O'Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Akiyoshi, H., Archibald, A. T., Bekki, S., Butchart, N., Chipperfield, M. P., Deushi, M., Dhomse, S. S., Garcia, R. R., Hardiman, S. C., Horowitz, L. W., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Kinnison, D., Lin, M., Mancini, E., Manyin, M. E., Marchand, M., Marécal, V., Michou, M., Oman, L. D., Pitari, G., Plummer, D. A., Revell, L. E., Saint-Martin, D., Schofield, R., Stenke, A., Stone, K., Sudo, K., Tanaka, T. Y., Tilmes, S., Yamashita, Y., Yoshida, K., and Zeng, G.: Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 639–671, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-639-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-639-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Multivariate ENSO Index Version 2 (MEI.v2):
<a href="https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/enso/mei/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 20 January 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, L. T., Logan, J. A., and Jacob, D. J.: Interannual variability in
tropical tropospheric ozone and OH: The role of lightning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 11468–11480, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50857" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50857</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, L. T., Mickley, L. J., Kaplan, J. O., Sofen, E. D., Pfeiffer, M., and Alexander, B.: Factors controlling variability in the oxidative capacity of the troposphere since the Last Glacial Maximum, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3589–3622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3589-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3589-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Naik, V., Voulgarakis, A., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, M., Prather, M. J., Young, P. J., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P. J., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty, R., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G. A., Josse, B., Lee, Y. H., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., van Noije, T. P. C., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Skeie, R., Shindell, D. T., Stevenson, D. S., Strode, S., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng, G.: Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5277–5298, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5277-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5277-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Naus, S., Montzka, S. A., Pandey, S., Basu, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Krol, M.: Constraints and biases in a tropospheric two-box model of OH, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 407–424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-407-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-407-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, N. H., Turner, A. J., Yin, Y., Prather, M. J., and Frankenberg, C.:
Effects of Chemical Feedbacks on Decadal Methane Emissions Estimates,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085706, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl085706" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl085706</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Nicely, J. M., Canty, T. P., Manyin, M., Oman, L. D., Salawitch, R. J.,
Steenrod, S. D., Strahan, S. E., and Strode, S. A.: Changes in Global
Tropospheric OH Expected as a Result of Climate Change Over the Last Several
Decades, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 10774–10795,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028388" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028388</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Nicely, J. M., Duncan, B. N., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., Salawitch, R. J., Deushi, M., Haslerud, A. S., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Kinnison, D. E., Klekociuk, A., Manyin, M. E., Marécal, V., Morgenstern, O., Murray, L. T., Myhre, G., Oman, L. D., Pitari, G., Pozzer, A., Quaglia, I., Revell, L. E., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Stone, K., Strahan, S., Tilmes, S., Tost, H., Westervelt, D. M., and Zeng, G.: A machine learning examination of hydroxyl radical differences among model simulations for CCMI-1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1341–1361, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1341-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1341-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Patra, P. K., Houweling, S., Krol, M., Bousquet, P., Belikov, D., Bergmann, D., Bian, H., Cameron-Smith, P., Chipperfield, M. P., Corbin, K., Fortems-Cheiney, A., Fraser, A., Gloor, E., Hess, P., Ito, A., Kawa, S. R., Law, R. M., Loh, Z., Maksyutov, S., Meng, L., Palmer, P. I., Prinn, R. G., Rigby, M., Saito, R., and Wilson, C.: TransCom model simulations of CH<sub>4</sub> and related species: linking transport, surface flux and chemical loss with CH<sub>4</sub> variability in the troposphere and lower stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12813–12837, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12813-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12813-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Pison, I., Bousquet, P., Chevallier, F., Szopa, S., and Hauglustaine, D.: Multi-species inversion of CH<sub>4</sub>, CO and H<sub>2</sub> emissions from surface measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5281–5297, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5281-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5281-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Prather, M. J. and Holmes, C. D.: Overexplaining or underexplaining
methane's role in climate change, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 114, 5324–5326, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704884114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704884114</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Rigby, M., Prinn, R. G., Fraser, P. J., Simmonds, P. G., Langenfelds, R. L.,
Huang, J., Cunnold, D. M., Steele, L. P., Krummel, P. B., Weiss, R. F.,
O'Doherty, S., Salameh, P. K., Wang, H. J., Harth, C. M., Mühle, J., and
Porter, L. W.: Renewed growth of atmospheric methane, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L22805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl036037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl036037</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Rigby, M., Montzka, S. A., Prinn, R. G., White, J. W. C., Young, D.,
O'Doherty, S., Lunt, M. F., Ganesan, A. L., Manning, A. J., Simmonds, P. G.,
Salameh, P. K., Harth, C. M., Muhle, J., Weiss, R. F., Fraser, P. J.,
Steele, L. P., Krummel, P. B., McCulloch, A., and Park, S.: Role of
atmospheric oxidation in recent methane growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
114, 5373–5377, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616426114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616426114</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Rowlinson, M. J., Rap, A., Arnold, S. R., Pope, R. J., Chipperfield, M. P., McNorton, J., Forster, P., Gordon, H., Pringle, K. J., Feng, W., Kerridge, B. J., Latter, B. L., and Siddans, R.: Impact of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on the interannual variability of methane and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8669–8686, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8669-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8669-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Poulter, B., Peregon, A., Ciais, P., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etiope, G., Bastviken, D., Houweling, S., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Tubiello, F. N., Castaldi, S., Jackson, R. B., Alexe, M., Arora, V. K., Beerling, D. J., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Brovkin, V., Bruhwiler, L., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P., Covey, K., Curry, C., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Joos, F., Kim, H.-S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R., Locatelli, R., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., Marshall, J., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Patra, P. K., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Pison, I., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J., Saito, M., Santini, M., Schroeder, R., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele, P., Takizawa, A., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R., Wiedinmyer, C., Wilton, D. J., Wiltshire, A., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Xu, X., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, Q.: The global methane budget 2000–2012, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 697–751, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Poulter, B., Peregon, A., Ciais, P., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etiope, G., Bastviken, D., Houweling, S., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Tubiello, F. N., Castaldi, S., Jackson, R. B., Alexe, M., Arora, V. K., Beerling, D. J., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P., Covey, K., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Joos, F., Kim, H.-S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R., Locatelli, R., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Patra, P. K., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Pison, I., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J., Saito, M., Santini, M., Schroeder, R., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Takizawa, A., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., Weiss, R., Wilton, D. J., Wiltshire, A., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Xu, X., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, Q.: Variability and quasi-decadal changes in the methane budget over the period 2000–2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11135–11161, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Raymond, P. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Houweling, S., Patra, P. K., Ciais, P., Arora, V. K., Bastviken, D., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Carlson, K. M., Carrol, M., Castaldi, S., Chandra, N., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P. M., Covey, K., Curry, C. L., Etiope, G., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Hegglin, M. I., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Hugelius, G., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Jensen, K. M., Joos, F., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., Laruelle, G. G., Liu, L., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., McNorton, J., Miller, P. A., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Müller, J., Murguia-Flores, F., Naik, V., Niwa, Y., Noce, S., O'Doherty, S., Parker, R. J., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Regnier, P., Riley, W. J., Rosentreter, J. A., Segers, A., Simpson, I. J., Shi, H., Smith, S. J., Steele, L. P., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Tubiello, F. N., Tsuruta, A., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., Weber, T. S., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R. F., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Yin, Y., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Zheng, B., Zhu, Q., Zhu, Q., and Zhuang, Q.: The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1561–1623, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Soden, B. J., Wetherald, R. T., Stenchikov, G. L., and Robock, A.: Global
Cooling After the Eruption of Mount Pinatubo: A Test of Climate Feedback by
Water Vapor, Science, 296, 727–730, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.296.5568.727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.296.5568.727</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Stevenson, D. S., Zhao, A., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Tilmes, S., Zeng, G., Murray, L. T., Collins, W. J., Griffiths, P., Shim, S., Horowitz, L. W., Sentman, L., and Emmons, L.: Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-1219" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-1219</a>, in review, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Strode, S. A., Worden, H. M., Damon, M., Douglass, A. R., Duncan, B. N., Emmons, L. K., Lamarque, J.-F., Manyin, M., Oman, L. D., Rodriguez, J. M., Strahan, S. E., and Tilmes, S.: Interpreting space-based trends in carbon monoxide with multiple models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7285–7294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7285-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7285-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, Y., Carmichael, G. R., Uno, I., Woo, J.-H., Kurata, G., Lefer, B.,
Shetter, R. E., Huang, H., Anderson, B. E., Avery, M. A., Clarke, A. D., and
Blake, D. R.: Impacts of aerosols and clouds on photolysis frequencies and
photochemistry during TRACE-P: 2. Three-dimensional study using a regional
chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108,
8822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003100</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., Wennberg, P. O., and Jacob, D. J.: Ambiguity
in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 5367–5372, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616020114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616020114</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, A. J., Fung, I., Naik, V., Horowitz, L. W., and Cohen, R. C.:
Modulation of hydroxyl variability by ENSO in the absence of external
forcing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 8931–8936, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807532115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807532115</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., and Kort, E. A.: Interpreting contemporary
trends in atmospheric methane, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 2805–2813, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
WDCGG: The World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases, available at: <a href="https://gaw.kishou.go.jp/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 10 December 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Yienger, J. J. and Levy II, H.: Empirical model of global soil-biogenic
NO<i>χ</i> emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100,
11447–11464, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd00370" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd00370</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, T., Hoell, A., Perlwitz, J., Eischeid, J., Murray, D., Hoerling, M.,
and Hamill, T. M.: Towards Probabilistic Multivariate ENSO Monitoring,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 10532–10540, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl083946" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl083946</a>, 2019.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Z., Zimmermann, N. E., Calle, L., Hurtt, G., Chatterjee, A., and
Poulter, B.: Enhanced response of global wetland methane emissions to the
2015–2016 El Niño-Southern Oscillation event, Environ. Res.
Lett., 13, 074009, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac939" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac939</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Lin, X., Berchet, A., Hegglin, M. I., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Hauglustaine, D. A., Szopa, S., Stavert, A. R., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Bekki, S., Deushi, M., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Kinnison, D., Kirner, O., Marécal, V., O'Connor, F. M., Plummer, D. A., Revell, L. E., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Strode, S., Tilmes, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Zheng, B.: Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13701–13723, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Lin, X., Berchet, A., Hegglin, M. I., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Dlugokencky, E. J., Langenfelds, R. L., Ramonet, M., Worthy, D., and Zheng, B.: Influences of hydroxyl radicals (OH) on top-down estimates of the global and regional methane budgets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9525–9546, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9525-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9525-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, B., Chevallier, F., Yin, Y., Ciais, P., Fortems-Cheiney, A., Deeter, M. N., Parker, R. J., Wang, Y., Worden, H. M., and Zhao, Y.: Global atmospheric carbon monoxide budget 2000–2017 inferred from multi-species atmospheric inversions, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1411–1436, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1411-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1411-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Ziemke, J. R., Oman, L. D., Strode, S. A., Douglass, A. R., Olsen, M. A., McPeters, R. D., Bhartia, P. K., Froidevaux, L., Labow, G. J., Witte, J. C., Thompson, A. M., Haffner, D. P., Kramarova, N. A., Frith, S. M., Huang, L.-K., Jaross, G. R., Seftor, C. J., Deland, M. T., and Taylor, S. L.: Trends in global tropospheric ozone inferred from a composite record of TOMS/OMI/MLS/OMPS satellite measurements and the MERRA-2 GMI simulation , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3257–3269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
