<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-987-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>The value of satellite observations in the analysis and<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> short-range prediction of Asian dust</article-title><alt-title>The value of satellite observations for Asian dust analysis</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{The value of satellite observations for Asian dust analysis}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A. Benedetti et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Benedetti</surname><given-names>Angela</given-names></name>
          <email>a.benedetti@ecmwf.int</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9971-9976</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Di Giuseppe</surname><given-names>Francesca</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9829-0429</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>Luke</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Peuch</surname><given-names>Vincent-Henri</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1396-0505</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Rémy</surname><given-names>Samuel</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4584-4157</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Xiaoye</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, CNRS/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather &amp; Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry of CMA,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, IUE, CAS, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Angela Benedetti (a.benedetti@ecmwf.int)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>24</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>987</fpage><lpage>998</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>10</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e150">Asian dust is a seasonal meteorological phenomenon which
affects east Asia, and has severe consequences on the air quality of China,
North and South Korea and Japan. Despite the continental extent, the
prediction of severe episodes and the anticipation of their consequences is
challenging. Three 1-year experiments were run to assess the skill of the
model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) in
monitoring Asian dust and understand its relative contribution to the aerosol
load over China. Data used were the Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Dark Target and the Deep Blue aerosol optical depth
(AOD). In particular the experiments aimed at understanding the added value
of data assimilation runs over a model run without any aerosol data. The year
2013 was chosen as representative of the availability of independent AOD data
from two established ground-based networks (AERONET, Aerosol Robotic Network,
and CARSNET, China Aerosol Remote Sensing Network), which could be used to
evaluate experiments. Particulate matter (PM) data from the China
Environmental Protection Agency were also used in the evaluation. Results
show that the assimilation of satellite AOD data is beneficial to predict the
extent and magnitude of desert dust events and to improve the short-range
forecast of such events. The availability of observations from the MODIS Deep
Blue algorithm over bright surfaces is an asset, allowing for a better
localization of the sources and definition of the dust events. In general
both experiments constrained by data assimilation perform better than the
unconstrained experiment, generally showing smaller normalized mean bias and
fractional gross error with respect to the independent verification datasets.
The impact of the assimilated satellite observations is larger at analysis
time, but lasts into the forecast up to 48 h. The performance of the global
model in terms of particulate matter does not show the same degree of skill
as the performance in terms of optical depth. Despite this, the global model
is able to capture some regional pollution patterns. This indicates that the
global model analyses may be used as boundary conditions for regional air
quality models at higher resolution, enhancing their performance in
situations in which part of the pollution may have originated from
large-scale mechanisms. While assimilation is not a substitute for model
development and characterization of the emission sources, results indicate
that it can play a role in delivering improved monitoring of Asian dust
optical depth.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page988?><p id="d1e160">Asian dust is a seasonal meteorological phenomenon which affects east Asia,
particularly during spring. Dust is transported from the deserts of
Taklimakan, Mongolia, northern China and Kazakhstan and can travel over long
distances, affecting the air quality of China, North and South Korea and Japan.
Occasionally, the dust can even be transported over the ocean over thousands
of kilometers and reach the coasts of North America. Measurements at Mauna
Loa, Hawaii, show the presence of dust of Asian origin
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e166">Dust is becoming a more serious concern due to the increase of industrial
pollutants contained in it, also in connection to intensified desertification
in China causing longer and more frequent occurrences, both linked to climate
factors and to land use change in west Asia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.2"/>.
Areas affected by dust experience poor air quality and, as a consequence,
dust is known to cause a variety of health problems, including sore throats
and asthma in otherwise healthy people. Often, people are advised to avoid or
minimize outdoor activities, depending on the severity of the storms. For
those who already have asthma or respiratory infections, dust-related pollution
can be fatal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.3"/>. The economic impact of dust
storms connected to reduced air visibility, canceled flights and disrupted
ground travel can also be high <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.4"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e178">Because of its health, social and economical impacts, it is critical to
understand the source strength, transport and deposition of dust and to
establish sand and dust storms (SDS) forecasting and early warning
capabilities. Under the auspices of the World Meteorological Organization
(WMO), the need for a global SDS forecasting and early warning system was
highlighted in 2005. More than 40 member countries expressed interest
in participating in activities to improve capacities for more reliable SDS
monitoring, forecasting and assessment. The SDS-WAS (Warning and Assessment
System) was launched in 2007 with the mission to enhance the ability of
countries to deliver timely and quality sand and dust storm forecasts,
observations and information to users through an international partnership of
research and operational communities. Towards this goal, three regional
centers have been created: the Northern Africa–Middle East–Europe (NAMEE)
node, the Pan-American node and the Asian node. The latter is hosted by the
Chinese Meteorological Administration (CMA) and its focus is Asian dust
prediction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.5"/>. Member countries of the Asian node
include Japan, South Korea, Mongolia and Kazakhstan. All centers run their forecast
models for the specific region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.6"/>. Some models
such as that of the Japan Meteorological Agency run at the global scale
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.7"/>. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather
Forecasts (ECMWF) also contributes its dust forecasts to the Asian node
through a partnership between the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service
(CAMS) and CMA<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d1e190">See <uri>http://eng.nmc.cn/sds_was.asian_rc/</uri> (last access: 21 January 2019) for further
reference.</p></fn>.</p>
      <p id="d1e197">Despite the recognized relevance, Asian dust monitoring and forecasting are
still a challenge due to the poor characterization of the sources, which have
strong spatial and temporal variability, and the paucity of observational data
available to characterize both emissions and transport, especially in
near-real time (NRT). A study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.8"/> compared eight
state-of-the-art dust models and showed that emission fluxes from the
Taklimakan desert and Mongolia strongly differ among the models. They
suggested that measurements of dust flux and accurate updated land use
information are important to improve the models over these regions. They also
found that modeling of dust transport and removal processes over key regions
needs to be improved in order to obtain more skillful dust prediction that
could underpin warning systems, improve preparedness and possibly lessen the
impacts.</p>
      <p id="d1e204">Although modeling problems need to be tackled at the level of the
parameterization of the physical, dynamical and radiative processes, data
assimilation of dust-related observations such as optical depth and lidar
backscatter from satellite sensors can help alleviate problems and improve
the forecast of dust events. This has been shown for example in a pioneering
work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.9"/>, in which the authors show that assimilation of
data from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite
Observations (CALIPSO) lidar in an ensemble Kalman filter framework improves
the model simulation of Aeolian dust events. Assimilation efforts to
specifically improve dust prediction have been undertaken at the global and
regional scale by several institutes, both using ensemble methods in which
emissions are also perturbed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.10"/> and variational
methods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.11"/>. All studies show the positive impact of
satellite and in situ data assimilation in desert-dust-affected regions for
high load episodes, with some impact lasting into the forecast range.</p>
      <p id="d1e216">Progress has been made in recent years thanks to the deployment of accurate,
multi-channel aerosol sensors on satellite platforms and the improvement of
ground-based networks which are now offering stable observations of good
quality over long periods and increasingly in NRT. Given these opportunities
in this paper, we will investigate the added benefit of data assimilation for
the desert dust analysis and short-range prediction using ECMWF's Integrated
Forecasting System (IFS) and aerosol
optical depth (AOD) observations from Moderate Resolution
Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), which are now also available on bright
surfaces (Deep Blue collection) in the framework of the 4D-Var assimilation
system extended to aerosol species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.12"/>. The
novelty with respect to previous studies that also employed MODIS
observations (i.e., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="altparen.13"/>) rests in the use of a fully
<italic>operational</italic> 4D-Var system in which the model dynamics serve as a
constraint during the assimilation. For dust storms of synoptic extent, this
constraint might imply a longer lasting impact of the assimilated data into
the forecast range. The verification of the analysis and forecast benefits
from the availability of data from the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx15" id="altparen.14"/>), as well from the China Aerosol Remote
Sensing Network (CARSNET; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="altparen.15"/>). Additionally, PM data from the
China Environmental Protection<?pagebreak page989?> Agency (CEPA) are also used to assess the
value of AOD assimilation in surface PM forecasts.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Description of the ECMWF CAMS system</title>
      <p id="d1e240">Desert dust forecasts are provided by the ECMWF CAMS system, which is a
comprehensive modeling and assimilation system based on the IFS developed at
ECMWF with the extended capabilities of including atmospheric composition
tracers in the transport model and in the analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.16"/>. The
system has been developed in the CAMS precursor projects, Global and Regional
Earth System Monitoring Using Satellite and In Situ Data (GEMS;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="altparen.17"/>) and Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate
(MACC; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="altparen.18"/>). Aerosols are forecast within the ECMWF CAMS global
system by an aerosol model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.19"/>, based on earlier work by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.20"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.21"/> that uses five species: dust, sea
salt, black carbon, organic carbon and sulfates. In the version of the model
used in this study, nitrates were not included. More recent versions of the
model do include this important aerosol component.</p>
      <p id="d1e262">Dust aerosols specifically are represented by three prognostic variables that
correspond to three size bins, with bin limits of 0.03, 0.55, 0.9 and 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m radius. Specific dust processes that are parameterized are the production
of dust through saltation and removal by wet and dry deposition and
sedimentation. Various areas are marked as having the potential to emit dust
based on surface albedo, moisture of the top soil level and bare soil
fraction. Dust emissions are parameterized following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.22"/> as a
function of the cubic power of 10 m wind speed. A correction is also applied
to account for gustiness as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.23"/>. Dry deposition
depends on a prescribed deposition velocity and on the aerosol concentration
in the model level closer to the surface.</p>
      <p id="d1e278">For sea salt, a bin representation is used and emissions are also
parameterized as a function of surface winds. For all other tropospheric
aerosols (carbonaceous aerosols and sulfates), a bulk parameterization is
used and emission sources are defined according to established inventories
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.24"/>. Biomass burning emissions contributing to black carbon
and organic matter loads are prescribed from the Global Fire Assimilation
System (GFAS; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="altparen.25"/>). Removal processes include sedimentation for
dust and sea salt only, and wet and dry deposition and in-cloud and below-cloud scavenging for all particles. A simplified representation of the sulfur
cycle is also included with only two variables, sulfur dioxide (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
acting as a precursor for sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in particulate form. Overall, a
total of 12 additional prognostic variables for the mass mixing ratio of the
different components (bins or types) of the various aerosols are used in this
configuration. The ECMWF CAMS system also includes chemically reactive
tracers such as ozone, carbon monoxide, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and formaldehyde, as well as
greenhouse gases.</p>
      <p id="d1e316">The ECMWF CAMS system is used operationally to provide global forecasts of
aerosols, reactive gases and greenhouse gases, as well as boundary conditions
for higher resolution regional models proving air quality forecasts over
Europe. Data are freely available from the CAMS website
(<uri>https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/</uri>; last access: 21 January 2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methodology and experimental setup</title>
      <p id="d1e328">The ECMWF CAMS system also runs a 4D-Var assimilation of satellite- and
ground-based data for the meteorological variables as well as the atmospheric
composition variables. The aerosol assimilation uses total aerosol mixing
ratio as a control variable. Each aerosol species is assumed to contribute to
the total aerosol mixing ratio according to a fractional contribution which
is assumed constant over the 12 h assimilation window. At the end of the
minimization, the increments in total aerosol mixing ratio are distributed to
the individual species according to their fractional contribution to the
total mass. A forward model is used to calculate the aerosol optical depth
(AOD) from the individual components using a lookup table approach. The
aerosol optical properties are prescribed according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.26"/>.
During the minimization, the tabulated optical properties of the individual
species are retrieved and used in the calculation of the total extinction.
The vertical integral of the extinction profile provided the total AOD, which
is the observed quantity, at every observation location. The vertical profile
of the aerosol mixing ratio is not modified by the assimilation as only AOD
is used as observation. Thus, the vertical profile is largely dictated by the
model and the distribution of the increments in the vertical is due to the
vertical structure function in the background error.</p>
      <p id="d1e334">AOD data at 550 nm from the MODIS sensors on board the Terra and Aqua
satellites have been assimilated in the ECMWF 4D-Var system since 2008
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.27"/>. Initially, only the Dark Target product was used
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.28"/>. Since 2015, both MODIS Dark Target and Deep Blue
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.29"/> data have been used. Deep Blue offers the advantage
of providing aerosol optical depth (AOD) retrievals over bright surfaces, which is
of particular interest for getting insight on dust sources by means of data
assimilation. It can be assumed that over deserts the biggest contribution to
AOD comes from dust aerosols, even if the analysis uses total AOD and the
other aerosol species are also included. Recently, MODIS Collection (Col.) 6 has
become available
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.30"/>. This is the
collection that has been used in this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e349">The operational ECMWF CAMS system also uses AOD data from the MetOp Polar
Multi-sensor Aerosol<?pagebreak page990?> product (PMAp), operationally provided by EUMETSAT after February 2014, and hence not
available for the experiments outlined in this paper. Assimilation of this
product for the purpose of the application outlined here would need an
independent assessment.</p>
      <p id="d1e352">To investigate the impact of the assimilation on the dust prediction, three
experiments were set up for the whole of 2013: one experiment with 4D-Var
data assimilation of MODIS Col. 6 with the exclusion of Deep Blue data
(indicated hereafter as DT), one experiment with 4D-Var assimilation of MODIS
Col. 6 data with the inclusion of Deep Blue data (indicated as DTDB) and one
control experiment with free-running aerosols (indicated as CONTROL). In the
control experiment, no aerosol data are assimilated in the analysis. In this
paper, we focus on results during the spring season (March–April–May 2013),
when several marked events occurred.</p>
      <p id="d1e356">The horizontal resolution of the operational version run in the context of
CAMS is currently 40 km with 60 vertical levels and model top at 0.1 hPa. The
experiments shown here were run with a previous version of the system,
comparable with the CAMS configuration for 2013, with a horizontal resolution
of 80 km and the same number of vertical levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Outcomes of the investigation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Comparisons with independent AOD datasets</title>
      <p id="d1e370">Results from the three experiments (DT, DTDB and CONTROL) are presented in
the following. Comparisons were made with independent datasets from AERONET
and CARSNET. AERONET data are routinely used for the verification of the
ECMWF CAMS forecasts, but this is the first time that the CARSNET dataset has
been used in this context. Model data were bilinearly interpolated to the
AERONET and CARSNET site locations and then averaged over 24 h periods (from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). AERONET data are similarly averaged, with each data value
receiving a weight proportional to the time difference between the data
values before and after it, up to a maximum of 3 h. The CARSNET data
used were already in the form of daily averages and no further averaging was
done.</p>
      <p id="d1e397">While the entire year was considered, we focus in this paper on the spring
season when Asian dust is at its peak due to the seasonal increased frequency
of cyclonic weather systems with associated high surface wind speeds. At this
time of the year the contrast between warm air masses in the south and cold
air masses from Siberia and Mongolia is maximum. The high north–south thermal
gradient can give rise to situations characterized by a high baroclinic
instability, with the development of fast developing and moving lows
associated with high winds over the dust-emitting regions of the Taklimakan
and Gobi deserts and inner Mongolia.</p>
      <p id="d1e400"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>As an example of the extent of these types of events, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> shows
the 9 March dust storm as simulated by the ECMWF model, along with the
coverage provided by the MODIS Dark Target and Deep Blue AOD retrievals.
Comparing with the satellite image on the same day (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), courtesy of NASA, the model shows a good degree of
qualitative agreement with the observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e408">This particular dust storm was analyzed in detail by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.31"/>. The
storm originated in the Taklimakan and dust was first transported to
northeastern China and further transported to the southeast. The air quality
in Beijing was severely affected as the sandstorm spread. The dust further
propagated to the Korean Peninsula and Japan.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e417">Desert dust event forecast by the CAMS system for 9 March 2013
(shaded) with observation locations from the Dark Target (yellow dots) and
the Deep Blue algorithms (blue dots) from MODIS Collection 6 used in the
assimilation experiments. A few in situ verification stations are also
highlighted. For these stations detailed results are provided.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/987/2019/acp-19-987-2019-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e428">NASA Worldview image for 9 March 2013 (<uri>https://go.nasa.gov/2FI0vbI</uri>; last access: 21 January 2019).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/987/2019/acp-19-987-2019-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e442">Two-dimensional histogram of modeled versus observed AOD at 440 nm
for all stations (33 in total) in central–northern China (30–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 75–135<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E).
Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows experiment CONTROL, panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows experiment DT
and panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows experiment DTDB. FC stands for forecast (model
simulation) and OB stands for observations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/987/2019/acp-19-987-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e480">Fractional bias for aerosol optical depth at 440 nm with respect to
AERONET (circles) and CARSNET (squares) data: panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the experiment
CONTROL, panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows experiment DT (with only Dark Target MODIS
retrievals in the assimilation), and panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows experiment DTDB (with
both Dark Target and Deep Blue MODIS retrievals in the assimilation).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/987/2019/acp-19-987-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page991?><p id="d1e499">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows a first look at the model performance via
2-D histograms of model versus observed values of AOD at 440 nm for
March–May 2013. All stations are considered together. Data are plotted for
central–northern China (30–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 75–135<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). Visual inspection of the plots
shows that both assimilation experiments have a more similar distribution
than the control experiment with respect to the observations, particularly
for large dust events (red shades). The mean of the observations is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.593</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>
versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.481</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> for experiment CONTROL, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.599</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> for experiment DT and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.602</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>
for experiment DTDB. Correlation is the highest for experiment DTDB at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.725</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.707</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> for experiment DT and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.668</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> for experiment CONTROL.</p>
      <p id="d1e572">The statistical indicators presented here are fractional bias (FB, sometimes
also referred to as modified normalized mean bias) and fractional gross error
(FGE), although other indicators have been analyzed and have been found to
lead to similar conclusions. The mathematical definitions for these
parameters are the following:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M18" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FB</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FGE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the model output and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the observations; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
represents the total number of observations. The FB is normalized to make it
non-dimensionless. It varies between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and has an ideal value of
zero for a perfect model (and perfect observations). The FGE ranges between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and behaves symmetrically with respect to under- and overestimation,
without overemphasizing outliers (as instead the root mean square error
does). See <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.32"/> for further information.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e776">As in for Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> but for fractional gross error.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/987/2019/acp-19-987-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e789">Time series of fractional bias <bold>(a)</bold> and fractional gross error <bold>(b)</bold> in
AOD at 440 nm averaged over the central–northern China area (33 sites). Solid
lines are relative to AERONET data, whereas dotted lines are relative to
CARSNET data. Red is experiment CONTROL, green is experiment DT and blue is
experiment DTDB.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/987/2019/acp-19-987-2019-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e804">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows maps of FB for aerosol optical
depth (AOD) at 440 nm with respect to all AERONET and CARSNET sites for March–May 2013 over
central–northern China at the analysis time. Within a certain margin of
noise, it is possible to see that the performance of both experiments
including assimilated MODIS data is more skillful than that of the control
experiment. The figure also shows that including the Deep Blue data, which
provide aerosol optical depth information over bright surfaces, helps to
further reduce the bias with respect to the ground-based observations. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows maps of FGE and confirms that the error with respect to
the independent observations is reduced in the runs with assimilated
satellite data.</p>
      <p id="d1e812">Time series of FB and FGE average over the same area are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. Again, the improvement in bias and error in the
assimilation experiments is visible. The model has generally a similar bias
when compared to the CARSNET observations and AERONET stations over this
region. The bias is particularly large for the CONTROL experiment, except for
some days. Yet again the experiments with assimilated satellite data perform
visibly better than the CONTROL. If we focus on the FGE, its maximum value
during the study period reached values of 1. Focusing, for example, on 10 April, the error in the experiment CONTROL is close to 1.1 with respect to the
AERONET stations (solid red line) and 0.7 with respect to the CARSNET station
(dotted red line). However,<?pagebreak page992?> the FGE for the DT and DTDB experiments is around
0.2 for AERONET stations (green and blue solid lines) and 0.4 for CARSNET
stations (green and blue dotted lines), with a 50 %–80 % reduction in error due
to the assimilation of satellite data. However, on other dates, the improvement
is less marked. The dust storm case of 9 March is quite interesting. The
FGE is 0.9 for all experiments with respect to the CARSNET data (red, green
and blue dotted lines), but is reduced to 0.3 the following day with a faster
decrease for the DTDB experiment (blue dotted line) than for the other
experiments. This indicates the additional benefits of including
observational satellite information over source areas. Curiously on 10 March one can observe a similar behavior but this time with respect to the
AERONET observations, with the FGE going from 0.9 in the CONTROL (red solid line)
to 0.4 in experiments DT and DTDB (green and blue solid lines) for an
improved agreement with the AOD at the AERONET stations close to 60 %. In
this case, the satellite data have improved the analysis observations
downwind of the storm (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e819">Specific sites in China have also been selected in order to understand the
model skill in both remote and urbanized regions that are particularly
affected by Asian dust plumes. The agreement between the experiments and
independent observations is generally better for AERONET stations than
CARSNET stations with generally lower normalized mean bias and FGE, highlighting the fact that
the arid Asian regions where some of the CARSNET stations are located are
more challenging for the model to represent correctly.</p>
      <p id="d1e822">This can also be seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> in which the model is
compared with the observations at several CARSNET stations over the whole
spring season of 2013. The increase in AOD corresponding to the passage of the
9 March storm shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> is evident in the ground-based
CARSNET observations. The magnitude of the dust peak in the source region is
best captured by the runs with assimilated Deep Blue AOD data, even though
the secondary dust peak is still underestimated by the model, as shown in the
time series for Tazhong (39.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–83.67<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). The improvement coming from
assimilation is especially felt downwind of the source regions, as seen for
example in Shangri-La (28.03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–99.73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) to the southeast and Xilinhot
(43.95<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–116.12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) to the northeast.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e886">Comparison of CARSNET aerosol optical depth data (blue squares) with
model aerosol optical depth at several CARSNET stations highlighted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> during the period March–May 2013. Red corresponds to experiment
CONTROL, green to experiment DT and blue to experiment DTDB. From <bold>(a)</bold>
to <bold>(g)</bold>: Tazhong (39.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–83.67<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Xilinhot (43.95<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–83.67<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Dalian
(38.90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–121.63<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Huimin (37.48<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–117.53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Tianjin (39.10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–117.17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Beijing
(39.80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–116.47<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) and Shangri-La (28.02<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–99.73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/987/2019/acp-19-987-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1033">The histograms on the top and bottom rows are constructed using data
from all stations displayed in the map of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and are valid at
the analysis and 48 h forecast times, respectively.
Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are relative to the experiment CONTROL,
<bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold> to the experiment DT and <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> to the experiment DTDB.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/987/2019/acp-19-987-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p id="d1e1066">Fractional bias <bold>(a)</bold> and fractional gross error <bold>(b)</bold> as a
function of forecast range for experiment CONTROL (red), experiment DT
(green) and experiment DTDB (blue). Data are averaged over central–northern
China (30–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 75–135<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) for the period March–May 2013.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/987/2019/acp-19-987-2019-f09.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Impact of the assimilation on the short-range AOD forecasts</title>
      <?pagebreak page994?><p id="d1e1105">In the previous subsection, results have been presented that show how
assimilation of AOD satellite data from the MODIS retrievals brings
beneficial improvements to the simulation of AOD within the ECMWF CAMS
system. The impact on the analysis is clearly shown in the improvement in the
FB and FGE. The question that might arise at this point is whether the impact
of the assimilated satellite data is only felt at the analysis time or
whether it carries on to the subsequent forecast. To answer this question,
the spatial data relative to FB shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> are summarized
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> using a histogram which shows the FB as a
function of the number of AERONET and CARSNET sites. Panels a, b and c show
the histogram for the analysis time, whereas panels d, e and f show the same
for the 48 h forecast. Again, we can observe that the skill of the experiments
with data assimilation is higher with respect to the control experiment.
While this increased skill is higher at analysis time, it persists into the
short-range forecast at 48 h.</p>
      <p id="d1e1112">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> shows the behavior of FB and FGE as a
function of forecast range. This is another way to display what is already shown
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. It can be seen that the average FB (FGE) over
central–northern China is lower by about 0.4 (0.2) for experiments DT and
DTDB with respect to the control experiment. Of particular interest is the
fact that the skill of the two experiments with data assimilation is almost
constant at various forecast lead times, indicating that the positive impact
of the observations is also felt after the analysis into the short-range
forecast.</p>
      <p id="d1e1119">ECMWF CAMS forecasts are issued out to day 5. However, some users utilize the forecast from day 2 for their applications. For example, for the management
of solar power plants, it is the 48 h aerosol forecast that is considered to
plan the plant operations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.33"/>. In these instances, a
reduction in the forecast bias from day 2 is a welcome development. Moreover,
experiment DTDB, which included both MODIS Dark Target and Deep Blue data,
shows a slightly lower fractional gross error in the comparison with CARSNET
data than the DT experiment, indicating an additional beneficial impact of
observations close to the dust sources.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1127"><bold>(a)</bold> March 2013 PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> time series for the measurements recorded at the
11 stations available in the Beijing (39.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) municipality and the
simulations performed with the ECMWF model in the different configurations
(CONTROL in red, DT in green and DTDB in blue). <bold>(b)</bold> Location and
identification code of the observation stations around the Beijing area. The
map covers an area of approximately 40 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/987/2019/acp-19-987-2019-f10.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Comparisons with independent PM data</title>
      <p id="d1e1183">PM data were obtained for the months of March–May 2013 from CEPA for several
stations in the Beijing area. For clarity purposes, only the month of March is
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>, which presents the comparison between
model PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values and observations (panel a) and a map with the location of
the stations (panel b). The data for all stations show a peak in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (all
particles with diameter smaller than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m), corresponding to the
passage of the dust front on 9 March. The box plot represents the histograms
of hourly data obtained from the 11 air quality stations available in the
Beijing municipality. Outliers are indicated with a dot. The coarse
resolution of the ECMWF model means that all station points are included in
the same grid box.</p>
      <p id="d1e1213">The model captures the front passage which is visible in the increase of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the timing of the PM maximum in the model is early by
approximately 3 h. If we consider the average value of the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
observation peak, then the model underestimates it by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Outside the peak, the values of PM in the models are too
large, indicating a broader spatial extent of the aerosol plume in the model
with respect to what was observed. It is important to notice that the coarse
model resolution does not allow the fine details of the local pollution to be
resolved, particularly in regions in which the topography is varied.
Moreover, not all species are modeled in the system. For example nitrates are
not included in the model version used in this study and this missing
component might partially be the cause of the clear disagreement between the
model and observations (see, for example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="altparen.34"/>). However in
situations dominated by large-scale synoptic events such as the case for the
dust storm of 9 March, the model can give a qualitative indication of the
cause of the increased pollution and can be used to provide a warning to the
population. This is what is seen for all experiments in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a. What we can also observe is that the
assimilation is not able to improve the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> forecast. The small
differences between the experiments with assimilated satellite data and the
control experiment are well within the large differences between the model
and observations. PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is increased in the DTDB experiment thanks to the
additional AOD data, but it does not reach the observed peak. The spurious
secondary peak of 10 March, not reported in the PM data, is reduced in the
DTDB experiment. However,<?pagebreak page995?> once again, the difference with the observed values
of PM is of 2 orders of magnitude.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1288">The operational ECMWF CAMS system was used to demonstrate the impact of
assimilating satellite AOD data for an improved characterization of Asian
dust storms. Three experiments were conducted: one control experiment with no
aerosol data assimilated, one experiment with only Collection 6 MODIS Dark
Target AOD retrievals, which do not offer coverage over bright surfaces, and
one experiment with all available MODIS data including Deep Blue AOD
retrievals.</p>
      <p id="d1e1291">Several concluding points can be learned from these experiments. Results
confirm that assimilation of advanced satellite data is effective for
improving the representation of desert dust distributions over Asia and for
monitoring and forecasting dust episodes (in the short range). In particular,
MODIS Deep Blue data are beneficial both in source regions (i.e., Tazhong) and downwind of desert areas (i.e., Xilinhot and Shangri-La). The
fractional bias and the gross error with respect to independent AOD
observations from the AERONET and CARSNET ground-based networks are lower in
the assimilation experiments than in the control forecast with no assimilated
aerosol data. Time series of FGE averaged over central–northern China reveal
that in some extreme cases the FGE is reduced by as much as 60 %–80 % in the
experiment which includes all MODIS data (DTDB) with respect to the
experiment which has no aerosol data (CONTROL). The impact of the assimilated
data is mainly felt at the analysis time but remains visible in the 48 h
forecast.</p>
      <p id="d1e1294">Comparisons with PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data from the CEPA network for March 2013 in the
Beijing area show that the model has skill in predicting the passage of a
dust front. However there is a mismatch in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values with large biases (up
to 2 orders of magnitude in some cases) displayed by the model, even for
the assimilation experiments. The assimilation of satellite AOD in this case
can only make small adjustments to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> but is unable to improve the quality of forecast fundamentally. Despite this, the passage of the storm
is captured, indicating that the global model is somewhat able to capture the
regional pollution flow, even at coarse resolution. This indicates that the
global model analyses may be used as boundary conditions for regional air
quality models at higher resolution, enhancing their performance in
situations when part of the pollution may have originated via synoptic flow
mechanisms. However, the skill of the global model for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is poor. This is
likely due to model biases, coarse resolution, unresolved topography, a lack of
resolved local emissions and a lack of observations to constrain the aerosol
speciation and vertical structure. It is worth mentioning that AOD is less
affected by these factors as it is a column-integrated variable. Also,
spatial patterns of AOD do not always match with those of surface PM due to
variability in aerosol hygroscopicity and relative humidity which can affect
AOD greatly but leave PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> completely unchanged.</p>
      <?pagebreak page996?><p id="d1e1342">These results highlight the crucial importance of the verifying datasets to
assess model skill and assimilation impact. CARSNET data offer unprecedented
coverage over remote Asian dust regions which are otherwise poorly observed.
From the regional distribution maps of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> it is possible to
see that CARSNET and AERONET stations over Asia are largely complementary.
Data availability in these regions both for assimilation and model evaluation
and development is key to progress in further addressing the challenges of
Asian dust prediction.</p>
      <p id="d1e1348">As part of CAMS, ECMWF is providing twice-daily forecasts of atmospheric
composition (including desert dust) up to 5 days ahead, which are publicly
available. These forecasts rely on assimilation of MODIS Collection 6.1 AOD
(both Dark Target and Deep Blue data) as well as PMAp data. They have been
shown to provide useful information and reliable boundary conditions for
local air quality applications in Europe, China and east Asia, provided they
are used in conjunction with high-resolution regional air quality models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e1355">Model data can be obtained from ECMWF upon request by directly contacting the
corresponding author (Angela Benedetti; angela.benedetti@ecmwf.int). AERONET
data can be obtained from their website at <uri>https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>
(last acccess: 21 January 2019). The CARSNET and CEPA data used in this
article were courtesy of Xiaoye Zhang (xiaoye@cma.gov.cn).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e1364">FDG provided the initial
motivation for this study, contributed to the writing of the manuscript,
performed the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> verification and provided Figs. 1, 8 and 10. LJ provided the software for the plotting
of Figs. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9. VHP made several comments and suggestions for
the original version of the manuscript and provided financial support
through the PANDA project (FP7 606719). SR contributed to the
revised version of the manuscript and provided input on the description of
the model dust scheme which he had revised and developed. XZ
kindly provided the CARSNET AOD and the CEPA PM10 data.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e1379">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1385">This work has been initiated and partly funded by the PANDA European Project
(FP7, no. 606719). The work has also been supported by the Copernicus
Atmosphere Monitoring Service, which is part of the European Union's flagship
space programme Copernicus. CAMS data are freely available from
<uri>http://atmosphere.copernicus.eu</uri> (last access: 21 January 2019). The data providers contributing to the
AERONET and CARSNET networks are also gratefully acknowledged. We acknowledge
the use of imagery from the NASA Worldview application
(<uri>https://worldview.earthdata.nasa.gov/</uri>; last access: 21 January 2019) operated by the NASA Goddard Space
Flight Center Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS) project. PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
data were courtesy of the China Environmental Protection Agency network
(China). The co-editor Federic Fierli and two anonymous reviewers are
gratefully acknowledged for their useful comments which have greatly contributed to
the improvement of the original version of the manuscript. The design team at ECMWF (Anabel Bowen and Simon Witter) is also
gratefully acknowledged for revising all figures to comply with publication standards.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Federico Fierli<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Benedetti et al.(2009)Benedetti, Morcrette, Boucher, Dethof, Engelen,
Fisher, Flentje, Huneeus, Jones, Kaiser et al.</label><mixed-citation>Benedetti, A., Morcrette, J.-J., Boucher, O., Dethof, A., Engelen, R.,
Fisher,
M., Flentje, H., Huneeus, N., Jones, L., Kaiser, J. W., Kinne, S., Mangold, A., Razinger, M., Simmons, A. J., and Suttie, M.: Aerosol analysis
and forecast in the European centre for medium-range weather forecasts
integrated forecast system: 2. Data assimilation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011115</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Boucher et al.(2002)Boucher, Pham, and Venkataraman</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Pham, M., and Venkataraman, C.: Simulation of the atmospheric
sulfur cycle in the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique general
circulation model: Model description, model evaluation, and global and
European budgets, Note scientifique de l'IPSL, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL), Paris, France, 21, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bozzo et al.(2017)Bozzo, Remy, Benedetti, Flemming, Bechtold,
Rodwell, and Morcrette</label><mixed-citation>Bozzo, A., Remy, S., Benedetti, A., Flemming, J., Bechtold, P., Rodwell, M.,
and Morcrette, J.-J.: Implementation of a CAMS-based aerosol climatology in
the IFS, Technical Memorandum, 801, ECMWF, Reading, England, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21957/84ya94mls" ext-link-type="DOI">10.21957/84ya94mls</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Chauhan et al.(2016)Chauhan, Zheng, Xu, Cao, and Singh</label><mixed-citation>Chauhan, A., Zheng, S., Xu, M., Cao, C., and Singh, R. P.: Characteristic
changes in aerosol and meteorological parameters associated with dust event
of 9 March 2013, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2, 1–10,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0236-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40808-016-0236-1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Che et al.(2015)Che, Zhang, Xia, Goloub, Holben, Zhao, Wang, Zhang,
Wang, Blarel et al.</label><mixed-citation>Che, H., Zhang, X.-Y., Xia, X., Goloub, P., Holben, B., Zhao, H., Wang, Y.,
Zhang, X.-C., Wang, H., Blarel, L., Damiri, B., Zhang, R., Deng, X., Ma, Y.,
Wang, T., Geng, F., Qi, B., Zhu, J., Yu, J., Chen, Q., and Shi, G.:
Ground-based aerosol climatology of China: aerosol optical depths from the
China Aerosol Remote Sensing Network (CARSNET) 2002–2013, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 7619–7652, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7619-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7619-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Chen et al.(2011)Chen, Li, Ma, Pan, Zeng, Xu, Chen, and
Kan</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, R., Li, Y., Ma, Y., Pan, G., Zeng, G., Xu, X., Chen, B., and Kan, H.:
Coarse particles and mortality in three Chinese cities: the China Air
Pollution and Health Effects Study (CAPES), Sci. Total. Environ.,
409, 4934–4938, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Chuluun and Ojima(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Chuluun, T. and Ojima, D.: Land use change and carbon cycle in arid and
semi-arid lands of East and Central Asia, Sci. China Ser. C., 45, 48–54, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Courtier et~al.(1994)Courtier, Th{\'{e}}paut, and
Hollingsworth}}?><label>Courtier et al.(1994)Courtier, Thépaut, and
Hollingsworth</label><mixed-citation>
Courtier, P., Thépaut, J.-N., and Hollingsworth, A.: A strategy for
operational implementation of 4D-Var, using an incremental approach,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120, 1367–1387, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Darzi and Winchester(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Darzi, M. and Winchester, J. W.: Aerosol characteristics at Mauna Loa
Observatory, Hawaii, after east Asian dust storm episodes, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 87, 1251–1258, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Di~Tomaso et~al.(2017)Di~Tomaso, Schutgens, Jorba, and
Garc{\'{\i}}a-Pando}}?><label>Di Tomaso et al.(2017)Di Tomaso, Schutgens, Jorba, and
García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>Di Tomaso, E., Schutgens, N. A. J., Jorba, O., and Pérez García-Pando,
C.: A<?pagebreak page997?>ssimilation of MODIS Dark Target and Deep Blue observations in the dust
aerosol component of NMMB-MONARCH version 1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 10,
1107–1129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1107-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-1107-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Flemming et al.(2015)Flemming, Huijnen, Arteta, Bechtold, Beljaars,
Blechschmidt, Diamantakis, Engelen, Gaudel, Inness, Jones, Josse, Katragkou,
Marecal, Peuch, Richter, Schultz, Stein, and Tsikerdekis</label><mixed-citation>Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Arteta, J., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A.,
Blechschmidt, A.-M., Diamantakis, M., Engelen, R. J., Gaudel, A., Inness, A.,
Jones, L., Josse, B., Katragkou, E., Marecal, V., Peuch, V.-H., Richter, A.,
Schultz, M. G., Stein, O., and Tsikerdekis, A.: Tropospheric chemistry in the
Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 975–1003,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Ginoux et al.(2001)Ginoux, Chin, Tegen, Prospero, Holben, Dubovik,
and Lin</label><mixed-citation>
Ginoux, P., Chin, M., Tegen, I., Prospero, J. M., Holben, B., Dubovik, O.,
and
Lin, S.-J.: Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the
GOCART model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
20255–20273, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Gong and Zhang(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Gong, S. L. and Zhang, X. Y.: CUACE/Dust – an integrated system of
observation and modeling systems for operational dust forecasting in Asia,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2333–2340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2333-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2333-2008</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Goudie(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Goudie, A. S.: Desert dust and human health disorders, Environ. Int., 63,
101–113, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Holben et al.(2001)Holben, Tanre, Smirnov, Eck, Slutsker, Abuhassan,
Newcomb, Schafer, Chatenet, Lavenu et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B., Tanre, D., Smirnov, A., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Abuhassan, N.,
Newcomb, W. W., Schafer, J., Chatenet, B., Lavenu, F., Kaufman, Y. J., Vande
Castle, J., Setzer, A., Markham, B., Clark, D., Frouin, R., Halthore, R.,
Karneli, A., O'Neill, N. T., Pietras, C., Pinker, R. T., Voss, K., and
Zibordi, G.: An emerging ground-based aerosol climatology: Aerosol optical
depth from AERONET, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 12067–12097, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Holben et al.(1998)Holben, Eck, Slutsker, Tanre, Buis, Setzer,
Vermote, Reagan, Kaufman, Nakajima et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Eck, T., Slutsker, I., Tanre, D., Buis, J., Setzer, A.,
Vermote,
E., Reagan, J., Kaufman, Y., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F., Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET – A federated
instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Hollingsworth et al.(2008)Hollingsworth, Engelen, Textor, Benedetti,
Boucher, Chevallier, Dethof, Elbern, Eskes, Flemming
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Hollingsworth, A., Engelen, R., Textor, C., Benedetti, A., Boucher, O.,
Chevallier, F., Dethof, A., Elbern, H., Eskes, H., Flemming, J., Granier, C., Kaiser, J. W., Morcrette, J.-J., Rayner, P., Peuch, V.-H.,
Rouil, L., Schultz, M. G., Simmons, A. J., and The Gems Consortium:
Toward a monitoring and forecasting system for atmospheric composition: The
GEMS project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 89,
1147–1164, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Holmes and Zoller(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, J. and Zoller, W.: The elemental signature of transported Asian dust
at
Mauna Loa observatory, Tellus B, 48, 83–92, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Hsu et al.(2013)Hsu, Jeong, Bettenhausen, Sayer, Hansell, Seftor,
Huang, and Tsay</label><mixed-citation>
Hsu, N., Jeong, M.-J., Bettenhausen, C., Sayer, A., Hansell, R., Seftor, C.,
Huang, J., and Tsay, S.-C.: Enhanced Deep Blue aerosol retrieval algorithm:
The second generation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
9296–9315, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Jeong(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, D.-Y.: Socio-Economic Costs from Yellow Dust Damages in South Korea,
Korean Social Science Journal, 2, 1–29, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Kaiser et al.(2012)Kaiser, Heil, Andreae, Benedetti, Chubarova,
Jones, Morcrette, Razinger, Schultz, Suttie et al.</label><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J. W., Heil, A., Andreae, M. O., Benedetti, A., Chubarova, N., Jones,
L., Morcrette, J.-J., Razinger, M., Schultz, M. G., Suttie, M., and van der
Werf, G. R.: Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire
assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power, Biogeosciences,
9, 527–554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-527-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Lamarque et al.(2010)Lamarque, Bond, Eyring, Granier, Heil, Klimont,
Lee, Liousse, Mieville, Owen et al.</label><mixed-citation>Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z.,
Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D.,
Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M.,
Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.:
Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions
of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Lee et al.(2013)Lee, Kim, Honda, Lim, and Yi</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, H., Kim, H., Honda, Y., Lim, Y.-H., and Yi, S.: Effect of Asian dust
storms on daily mortality in seven metropolitan cities of Korea, Atmos. Environ., 79, 510–517, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Levy et al.(2010)Levy, Remer, Kleidman, Mattoo, Ichoku, Kahn, and
Eck</label><mixed-citation>Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., Kleidman, R. G., Mattoo, S., Ichoku, C., Kahn, R.,
and Eck, T. F.: Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target
aerosol products over land, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10399–10420,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10399-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10399-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Levy et al.(2013)Levy, Mattoo, Munchak, Remer, Sayer, Patadia, and
Hsu</label><mixed-citation>Levy, R. C., Mattoo, S., Munchak, L. A., Remer, L. A., Sayer, A. M., Patadia,
F., and Hsu, N. C.: The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and
ocean, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2989–3034,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Lin et al.(2008)Lin, Wang, and Zhu</label><mixed-citation>Lin, C., Wang, Z., and Zhu, J.: An Ensemble Kalman Filter for severe dust
storm data assimilation over China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2975–2983,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2975-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2975-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Liu et al.(2011)Liu, Liu, Lin, Schwartz, Lee, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Z., Liu, Q., Lin, H.-C., Schwartz, C. S., Lee, Y.-H., and Wang, T.:
Three-dimensional variational assimilation of MODIS aerosol optical depth:
Implementation and application to a dust storm over East Asia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016159</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Morcrette et al.(2008)Morcrette, Beljaars, Benedetti, Jones, and
Boucher</label><mixed-citation>Morcrette, J.-J., Beljaars, A., Benedetti, A., Jones, L., and Boucher, O.:
Sea-salt and dust aerosols in the ECMWF IFS model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL036041</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Morcrette et al.(2009)Morcrette, Boucher, Jones, Salmond, Bechtold,
Beljaars, Benedetti, Bonet, Kaiser, Razinger et al.</label><mixed-citation>Morcrette, J.-J., Boucher, O., Jones, L., Salmond, D., Bechtold, P.,
Beljaars,
A., Benedetti, A., Bonet, A., Kaiser, J., Razinger, M., Schulz, M., Serrar, S., Simmons, A. J., Sofiev, M., Suttie, M., Tompkins, A. M., and Untch, A.: Aerosol
analysis and forecast in the European Centre for medium-range weather
forecasts integrated forecast system: Forward modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011235" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011235</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Niu et al.(2008)Niu, Gong, Zhu, Liu, Hu, Zhou, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Niu, T., Gong, S. L., Zhu, G. F., Liu, H. L., Hu, X. Q., Zhou, C. H., and
Wang, Y. Q.: Data assimilation of dust aerosol observations for the
CUACE/dust forecasting system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3473–3482,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3473-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-3473-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Park et al.(2010)Park, Choe, Park, and Y.Chun</label><mixed-citation>
Park, S.-U., Choe, A., Park, M.-S., and Chun, Y.: Performance tests of the
Asian
dust aerosol model 2 (ADAM2), Journal of Sustainable Energy &amp; Environment,
1, 77–83, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Peuch and Engelen(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Peuch, V. and Engelen, R.: Towards and operational GMES Atmosphere Monitoring
Service, ECMWF Newsletter, 132, 20–25, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Reddy et al.(2005)Reddy, Boucher, Bellouin, Schulz, Balkanski,
Dufresne, and Pham</label><mixed-citation>Reddy, M. S., Boucher, O., Bellouin, N., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., Dufresne,
J.-L., and Pham, M.: Estimates of global multicomponent aerosol optical depth
and direct radiative perturbation in the Laboratoire de Météorologie
Dynamique general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004757" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004757</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Rubin et al.(2016)Rubin, Reid, Hansen, Anderson, Hoar, Reynolds,
Sessions, and Westphal</label><mixed-citation>Rubin, J. I., Reid, J. S., Hansen, J. A., Anderson, J. L., Collins, N., Hoar,
T. J., Hogan, T., Lynch, P., McLay, J., Reynolds, C. A., Sessions, W. R.,
Westphal, D. L., and Zhang, J.: Development of the Ensemble Navy Aerosol
Analysis Prediction System (ENAAPS) and its application of the Data
Assimilation Research Testbed (DART) in support of aerosol forecasting,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3927–3951, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3927-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3927-2016</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page998?><ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Sayer et al.(2013)Sayer, Hsu, Bettenhausen, and
Jeong</label><mixed-citation>
Sayer, A., Hsu, N., Bettenhausen, C., and Jeong, M.-J.: Validation and
uncertainty estimates for MODIS Collection 6 “Deep Blue” aerosol data,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7864–7872, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Sayer et al.(2014)Sayer, Munchak, Hsu, Levy, Bettenhausen, and
Jeong</label><mixed-citation>Sayer, A., Munchak, L., Hsu, N., Levy, R., Bettenhausen, C., and Jeong,
M.-J.:
MODIS Collection 6 aerosol products: Comparison between Aqua's e-Deep Blue,
Dark Target, and “merged” data sets, and usage recommendations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022453</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Schroedter-Homscheidt et al.(2013)Schroedter-Homscheidt, Oumbe,
Benedetti, and Morcrette</label><mixed-citation>
Schroedter-Homscheidt, M., Oumbe, A., Benedetti, A., and Morcrette, J.-J.:
Aerosols for concentrating solar electricity production forecasts:
requirement quantification and ECMWF/MACC aerosol forecast assessment,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 903–914, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Sekiyama et al.(2010)Sekiyama, Tanaka, Shimizu, and
Miyoshi</label><mixed-citation>Sekiyama, T. T., Tanaka, T. Y., Shimizu, A., and Miyoshi, T.: Data
assimilation of CALIPSO aerosol observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 39–49,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-39-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-39-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Shaw(1980)</label><mixed-citation>
Shaw, G. E.: Transport of Asian desert aerosol to the Hawaiian Islands, J.
Appl. Meteorol., 19, 1254–1259, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Tanaka and Chiba(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Tanaka, T. Y. and Chiba, M.: Global simulation of dust aerosol with a
chemical
transport model, MASINGAR, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 83, 255–278, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Uno et al.(2006)Uno, Wang, Chiba, Chun, Gong, Hara, Jung, Lee, Liu,
Mikami et al.</label><mixed-citation>Uno, I., Wang, Z., Chiba, M., Chun, Y., Gong, S., Hara, Y., Jung, E., Lee,
S.-S., Liu, M., Mikami, M., Music, S., Nickovic, S., Satake, S., Shao, Y., Song, Z., Sugimoto, N.,
Tanaka, T., and Westphal, D. L.: Dust model intercomparison (DMIP) study
over Asia: Overview, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006575" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006575</ext-link>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Wu et al.(2017)Wu, Zhang, Cao, Guo, Xia, Zhang, Lu, and
Cheng</label><mixed-citation>Wu, F., Zhang, D., Cao, J., Guo, X., Xia, Y., Zhang, T., Lu, H., and Cheng,
Y.: Limited production of sulfate and nitrate on front-associated dust storm
particles moving from desert to distant populated areas in northwestern
China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14473–14484,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14473-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-14473-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Yu et al.(2006)Yu, Eder, Dennis, Chu, and Schwartz</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, S., Eder, B., Dennis, R., Chu, S.-H., and Schwartz, S. E.: New unbiased
symmetric metrics for evaluation of air quality models, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 7, 26–34, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Zhang and coauthors(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X. and co-authors: WMO/WWRP sand and dust storm warning advisory and
assessment system (SDS-WAS), technical report on asian regional centre,
available at: <uri>https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/technique_report_on_asian_RC_final_2015.pdf</uri>
(last access: 21 January 2019), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Zhang et al.(2003)Zhang, Gong, Zhao, Arimoto, Wang, and
Zhou</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X.-Y., Gong, S., Zhao, T., Arimoto, R., Wang, Y., and Zhou, Z.:
Sources
of Asian dust and role of climate change versus desertification in Asian dust
emission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018206" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL018206</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The value of satellite observations in the analysis and short-range prediction of Asian dust</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Asian dust is a seasonal meteorological phenomenon which
affects east Asia, and has severe consequences on the air quality of China,
North and South Korea and Japan. Despite the continental extent, the
prediction of severe episodes and the anticipation of their consequences is
challenging. Three 1-year experiments were run to assess the skill of the
model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) in
monitoring Asian dust and understand its relative contribution to the aerosol
load over China. Data used were the Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Dark Target and the Deep Blue aerosol optical depth
(AOD). In particular the experiments aimed at understanding the added value
of data assimilation runs over a model run without any aerosol data. The year
2013 was chosen as representative of the availability of independent AOD data
from two established ground-based networks (AERONET, Aerosol Robotic Network,
and CARSNET, China Aerosol Remote Sensing Network), which could be used to
evaluate experiments. Particulate matter (PM) data from the China
Environmental Protection Agency were also used in the evaluation. Results
show that the assimilation of satellite AOD data is beneficial to predict the
extent and magnitude of desert dust events and to improve the short-range
forecast of such events. The availability of observations from the MODIS Deep
Blue algorithm over bright surfaces is an asset, allowing for a better
localization of the sources and definition of the dust events. In general
both experiments constrained by data assimilation perform better than the
unconstrained experiment, generally showing smaller normalized mean bias and
fractional gross error with respect to the independent verification datasets.
The impact of the assimilated satellite observations is larger at analysis
time, but lasts into the forecast up to 48&thinsp;h. The performance of the global
model in terms of particulate matter does not show the same degree of skill
as the performance in terms of optical depth. Despite this, the global model
is able to capture some regional pollution patterns. This indicates that the
global model analyses may be used as boundary conditions for regional air
quality models at higher resolution, enhancing their performance in
situations in which part of the pollution may have originated from
large-scale mechanisms. While assimilation is not a substitute for model
development and characterization of the emission sources, results indicate
that it can play a role in delivering improved monitoring of Asian dust
optical depth.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Benedetti et al.(2009)Benedetti, Morcrette, Boucher, Dethof, Engelen,
Fisher, Flentje, Huneeus, Jones, Kaiser et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Benedetti, A., Morcrette, J.-J., Boucher, O., Dethof, A., Engelen, R.,
Fisher,
M., Flentje, H., Huneeus, N., Jones, L., Kaiser, J. W., Kinne, S., Mangold, A., Razinger, M., Simmons, A. J., and Suttie, M.: Aerosol analysis
and forecast in the European centre for medium-range weather forecasts
integrated forecast system: 2. Data assimilation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011115</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Boucher et al.(2002)Boucher, Pham, and Venkataraman</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Pham, M., and Venkataraman, C.: Simulation of the atmospheric
sulfur cycle in the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique general
circulation model: Model description, model evaluation, and global and
European budgets, Note scientifique de l'IPSL, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL), Paris, France, 21, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bozzo et al.(2017)Bozzo, Remy, Benedetti, Flemming, Bechtold,
Rodwell, and Morcrette</label><mixed-citation>
Bozzo, A., Remy, S., Benedetti, A., Flemming, J., Bechtold, P., Rodwell, M.,
and Morcrette, J.-J.: Implementation of a CAMS-based aerosol climatology in
the IFS, Technical Memorandum, 801, ECMWF, Reading, England, <a href="https://doi.org/10.21957/84ya94mls" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21957/84ya94mls</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Chauhan et al.(2016)Chauhan, Zheng, Xu, Cao, and Singh</label><mixed-citation>
Chauhan, A., Zheng, S., Xu, M., Cao, C., and Singh, R. P.: Characteristic
changes in aerosol and meteorological parameters associated with dust event
of 9 March 2013, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2, 1–10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0236-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0236-1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Che et al.(2015)Che, Zhang, Xia, Goloub, Holben, Zhao, Wang, Zhang,
Wang, Blarel et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Che, H., Zhang, X.-Y., Xia, X., Goloub, P., Holben, B., Zhao, H., Wang, Y.,
Zhang, X.-C., Wang, H., Blarel, L., Damiri, B., Zhang, R., Deng, X., Ma, Y.,
Wang, T., Geng, F., Qi, B., Zhu, J., Yu, J., Chen, Q., and Shi, G.:
Ground-based aerosol climatology of China: aerosol optical depths from the
China Aerosol Remote Sensing Network (CARSNET) 2002–2013, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 7619–7652, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7619-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7619-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Chen et al.(2011)Chen, Li, Ma, Pan, Zeng, Xu, Chen, and
Kan</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, R., Li, Y., Ma, Y., Pan, G., Zeng, G., Xu, X., Chen, B., and Kan, H.:
Coarse particles and mortality in three Chinese cities: the China Air
Pollution and Health Effects Study (CAPES), Sci. Total. Environ.,
409, 4934–4938, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Chuluun and Ojima(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Chuluun, T. and Ojima, D.: Land use change and carbon cycle in arid and
semi-arid lands of East and Central Asia, Sci. China Ser. C., 45, 48–54, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Courtier et al.(1994)Courtier, Thépaut, and
Hollingsworth</label><mixed-citation>
Courtier, P., Thépaut, J.-N., and Hollingsworth, A.: A strategy for
operational implementation of 4D-Var, using an incremental approach,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120, 1367–1387, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Darzi and Winchester(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Darzi, M. and Winchester, J. W.: Aerosol characteristics at Mauna Loa
Observatory, Hawaii, after east Asian dust storm episodes, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 87, 1251–1258, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Di Tomaso et al.(2017)Di Tomaso, Schutgens, Jorba, and
García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>
Di Tomaso, E., Schutgens, N. A. J., Jorba, O., and Pérez García-Pando,
C.: Assimilation of MODIS Dark Target and Deep Blue observations in the dust
aerosol component of NMMB-MONARCH version 1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 10,
1107–1129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1107-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1107-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Flemming et al.(2015)Flemming, Huijnen, Arteta, Bechtold, Beljaars,
Blechschmidt, Diamantakis, Engelen, Gaudel, Inness, Jones, Josse, Katragkou,
Marecal, Peuch, Richter, Schultz, Stein, and Tsikerdekis</label><mixed-citation>
Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Arteta, J., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A.,
Blechschmidt, A.-M., Diamantakis, M., Engelen, R. J., Gaudel, A., Inness, A.,
Jones, L., Josse, B., Katragkou, E., Marecal, V., Peuch, V.-H., Richter, A.,
Schultz, M. G., Stein, O., and Tsikerdekis, A.: Tropospheric chemistry in the
Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 975–1003,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Ginoux et al.(2001)Ginoux, Chin, Tegen, Prospero, Holben, Dubovik,
and Lin</label><mixed-citation>
Ginoux, P., Chin, M., Tegen, I., Prospero, J. M., Holben, B., Dubovik, O.,
and
Lin, S.-J.: Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the
GOCART model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
20255–20273, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Gong and Zhang(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Gong, S. L. and Zhang, X. Y.: CUACE/Dust – an integrated system of
observation and modeling systems for operational dust forecasting in Asia,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2333–2340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2333-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2333-2008</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Goudie(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Goudie, A. S.: Desert dust and human health disorders, Environ. Int., 63,
101–113, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Holben et al.(2001)Holben, Tanre, Smirnov, Eck, Slutsker, Abuhassan,
Newcomb, Schafer, Chatenet, Lavenu et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B., Tanre, D., Smirnov, A., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Abuhassan, N.,
Newcomb, W. W., Schafer, J., Chatenet, B., Lavenu, F., Kaufman, Y. J., Vande
Castle, J., Setzer, A., Markham, B., Clark, D., Frouin, R., Halthore, R.,
Karneli, A., O'Neill, N. T., Pietras, C., Pinker, R. T., Voss, K., and
Zibordi, G.: An emerging ground-based aerosol climatology: Aerosol optical
depth from AERONET, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 12067–12097, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Holben et al.(1998)Holben, Eck, Slutsker, Tanre, Buis, Setzer,
Vermote, Reagan, Kaufman, Nakajima et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Eck, T., Slutsker, I., Tanre, D., Buis, J., Setzer, A.,
Vermote,
E., Reagan, J., Kaufman, Y., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F., Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET – A federated
instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Hollingsworth et al.(2008)Hollingsworth, Engelen, Textor, Benedetti,
Boucher, Chevallier, Dethof, Elbern, Eskes, Flemming
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Hollingsworth, A., Engelen, R., Textor, C., Benedetti, A., Boucher, O.,
Chevallier, F., Dethof, A., Elbern, H., Eskes, H., Flemming, J., Granier, C., Kaiser, J. W., Morcrette, J.-J., Rayner, P., Peuch, V.-H.,
Rouil, L., Schultz, M. G., Simmons, A. J., and The Gems Consortium:
Toward a monitoring and forecasting system for atmospheric composition: The
GEMS project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 89,
1147–1164, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Holmes and Zoller(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, J. and Zoller, W.: The elemental signature of transported Asian dust
at
Mauna Loa observatory, Tellus B, 48, 83–92, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Hsu et al.(2013)Hsu, Jeong, Bettenhausen, Sayer, Hansell, Seftor,
Huang, and Tsay</label><mixed-citation>
Hsu, N., Jeong, M.-J., Bettenhausen, C., Sayer, A., Hansell, R., Seftor, C.,
Huang, J., and Tsay, S.-C.: Enhanced Deep Blue aerosol retrieval algorithm:
The second generation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
9296–9315, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Jeong(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, D.-Y.: Socio-Economic Costs from Yellow Dust Damages in South Korea,
Korean Social Science Journal, 2, 1–29, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Kaiser et al.(2012)Kaiser, Heil, Andreae, Benedetti, Chubarova,
Jones, Morcrette, Razinger, Schultz, Suttie et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Kaiser, J. W., Heil, A., Andreae, M. O., Benedetti, A., Chubarova, N., Jones,
L., Morcrette, J.-J., Razinger, M., Schultz, M. G., Suttie, M., and van der
Werf, G. R.: Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire
assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power, Biogeosciences,
9, 527–554, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Lamarque et al.(2010)Lamarque, Bond, Eyring, Granier, Heil, Klimont,
Lee, Liousse, Mieville, Owen et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z.,
Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D.,
Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M.,
Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.:
Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions
of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Lee et al.(2013)Lee, Kim, Honda, Lim, and Yi</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, H., Kim, H., Honda, Y., Lim, Y.-H., and Yi, S.: Effect of Asian dust
storms on daily mortality in seven metropolitan cities of Korea, Atmos. Environ., 79, 510–517, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Levy et al.(2010)Levy, Remer, Kleidman, Mattoo, Ichoku, Kahn, and
Eck</label><mixed-citation>
Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., Kleidman, R. G., Mattoo, S., Ichoku, C., Kahn, R.,
and Eck, T. F.: Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target
aerosol products over land, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10399–10420,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10399-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10399-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Levy et al.(2013)Levy, Mattoo, Munchak, Remer, Sayer, Patadia, and
Hsu</label><mixed-citation>
Levy, R. C., Mattoo, S., Munchak, L. A., Remer, L. A., Sayer, A. M., Patadia,
F., and Hsu, N. C.: The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and
ocean, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2989–3034,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Lin et al.(2008)Lin, Wang, and Zhu</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, C., Wang, Z., and Zhu, J.: An Ensemble Kalman Filter for severe dust
storm data assimilation over China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2975–2983,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2975-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2975-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Liu et al.(2011)Liu, Liu, Lin, Schwartz, Lee, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Z., Liu, Q., Lin, H.-C., Schwartz, C. S., Lee, Y.-H., and Wang, T.:
Three-dimensional variational assimilation of MODIS aerosol optical depth:
Implementation and application to a dust storm over East Asia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016159</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Morcrette et al.(2008)Morcrette, Beljaars, Benedetti, Jones, and
Boucher</label><mixed-citation>
Morcrette, J.-J., Beljaars, A., Benedetti, A., Jones, L., and Boucher, O.:
Sea-salt and dust aerosols in the ECMWF IFS model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036041</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Morcrette et al.(2009)Morcrette, Boucher, Jones, Salmond, Bechtold,
Beljaars, Benedetti, Bonet, Kaiser, Razinger et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Morcrette, J.-J., Boucher, O., Jones, L., Salmond, D., Bechtold, P.,
Beljaars,
A., Benedetti, A., Bonet, A., Kaiser, J., Razinger, M., Schulz, M., Serrar, S., Simmons, A. J., Sofiev, M., Suttie, M., Tompkins, A. M., and Untch, A.: Aerosol
analysis and forecast in the European Centre for medium-range weather
forecasts integrated forecast system: Forward modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011235" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011235</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Niu et al.(2008)Niu, Gong, Zhu, Liu, Hu, Zhou, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
Niu, T., Gong, S. L., Zhu, G. F., Liu, H. L., Hu, X. Q., Zhou, C. H., and
Wang, Y. Q.: Data assimilation of dust aerosol observations for the
CUACE/dust forecasting system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3473–3482,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3473-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3473-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Park et al.(2010)Park, Choe, Park, and Y.Chun</label><mixed-citation>
Park, S.-U., Choe, A., Park, M.-S., and Chun, Y.: Performance tests of the
Asian
dust aerosol model 2 (ADAM2), Journal of Sustainable Energy &amp; Environment,
1, 77–83, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Peuch and Engelen(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Peuch, V. and Engelen, R.: Towards and operational GMES Atmosphere Monitoring
Service, ECMWF Newsletter, 132, 20–25, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Reddy et al.(2005)Reddy, Boucher, Bellouin, Schulz, Balkanski,
Dufresne, and Pham</label><mixed-citation>
Reddy, M. S., Boucher, O., Bellouin, N., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., Dufresne,
J.-L., and Pham, M.: Estimates of global multicomponent aerosol optical depth
and direct radiative perturbation in the Laboratoire de Météorologie
Dynamique general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004757" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004757</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Rubin et al.(2016)Rubin, Reid, Hansen, Anderson, Hoar, Reynolds,
Sessions, and Westphal</label><mixed-citation>
Rubin, J. I., Reid, J. S., Hansen, J. A., Anderson, J. L., Collins, N., Hoar,
T. J., Hogan, T., Lynch, P., McLay, J., Reynolds, C. A., Sessions, W. R.,
Westphal, D. L., and Zhang, J.: Development of the Ensemble Navy Aerosol
Analysis Prediction System (ENAAPS) and its application of the Data
Assimilation Research Testbed (DART) in support of aerosol forecasting,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3927–3951, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3927-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3927-2016</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Sayer et al.(2013)Sayer, Hsu, Bettenhausen, and
Jeong</label><mixed-citation>
Sayer, A., Hsu, N., Bettenhausen, C., and Jeong, M.-J.: Validation and
uncertainty estimates for MODIS Collection 6 “Deep Blue” aerosol data,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7864–7872, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Sayer et al.(2014)Sayer, Munchak, Hsu, Levy, Bettenhausen, and
Jeong</label><mixed-citation>
Sayer, A., Munchak, L., Hsu, N., Levy, R., Bettenhausen, C., and Jeong,
M.-J.:
MODIS Collection 6 aerosol products: Comparison between Aqua's e-Deep Blue,
Dark Target, and “merged” data sets, and usage recommendations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022453</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Schroedter-Homscheidt et al.(2013)Schroedter-Homscheidt, Oumbe,
Benedetti, and Morcrette</label><mixed-citation>
Schroedter-Homscheidt, M., Oumbe, A., Benedetti, A., and Morcrette, J.-J.:
Aerosols for concentrating solar electricity production forecasts:
requirement quantification and ECMWF/MACC aerosol forecast assessment,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 903–914, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Sekiyama et al.(2010)Sekiyama, Tanaka, Shimizu, and
Miyoshi</label><mixed-citation>
Sekiyama, T. T., Tanaka, T. Y., Shimizu, A., and Miyoshi, T.: Data
assimilation of CALIPSO aerosol observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 39–49,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-39-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-39-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Shaw(1980)</label><mixed-citation>
Shaw, G. E.: Transport of Asian desert aerosol to the Hawaiian Islands, J.
Appl. Meteorol., 19, 1254–1259, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Tanaka and Chiba(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Tanaka, T. Y. and Chiba, M.: Global simulation of dust aerosol with a
chemical
transport model, MASINGAR, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 83, 255–278, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Uno et al.(2006)Uno, Wang, Chiba, Chun, Gong, Hara, Jung, Lee, Liu,
Mikami et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Uno, I., Wang, Z., Chiba, M., Chun, Y., Gong, S., Hara, Y., Jung, E., Lee,
S.-S., Liu, M., Mikami, M., Music, S., Nickovic, S., Satake, S., Shao, Y., Song, Z., Sugimoto, N.,
Tanaka, T., and Westphal, D. L.: Dust model intercomparison (DMIP) study
over Asia: Overview, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006575" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006575</a>, 2006.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Wu et al.(2017)Wu, Zhang, Cao, Guo, Xia, Zhang, Lu, and
Cheng</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, F., Zhang, D., Cao, J., Guo, X., Xia, Y., Zhang, T., Lu, H., and Cheng,
Y.: Limited production of sulfate and nitrate on front-associated dust storm
particles moving from desert to distant populated areas in northwestern
China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14473–14484,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14473-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14473-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Yu et al.(2006)Yu, Eder, Dennis, Chu, and Schwartz</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, S., Eder, B., Dennis, R., Chu, S.-H., and Schwartz, S. E.: New unbiased
symmetric metrics for evaluation of air quality models, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 7, 26–34, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Zhang and coauthors(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X. and co-authors: WMO/WWRP sand and dust storm warning advisory and
assessment system (SDS-WAS), technical report on asian regional centre,
available at: <a href="https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/technique_report_on_asian_RC_final_2015.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/technique_report_on_asian_RC_final_2015.pdf</a>
(last access: 21 January 2019), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Zhang et al.(2003)Zhang, Gong, Zhao, Arimoto, Wang, and
Zhou</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X.-Y., Gong, S., Zhao, T., Arimoto, R., Wang, Y., and Zhou, Z.:
Sources
of Asian dust and role of climate change versus desertification in Asian dust
emission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018206" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018206</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
