Impacts of climate change and emissions on atmospheric oxidized nitrogen deposition over East Asia

A multi-model ensemble of Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) simulations is used to study the atmospheric oxidized nitrogen (NOy) deposition over East Asia under climate and emission changes projected for the future. Both dry and wet NOy deposition show significant decreases in the 2100s under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, primarily due to large anthropogenic emission reduction over both land and sea. However, in the near future of the 2030s, both dry and wet NOy deposition increase significantly due to continued increase in emissions. Marine primary production from both dry and wet NOy deposition increases by 19 %–34 % in the 2030s and decreases by 34 %–63 % in the 2100s over the East China Sea. The individual effect of climate or emission changes on dry and wet NOy deposition is also investigated. The impact of climate change on dry NOy deposition is relatively minor, but the effect on wet deposition, primarily caused by changes in precipitation, is much higher. For example, over the East China Sea, wet NOy deposition increases significantly in summer due to climate change by the end of this century under RCP8.5, which may subsequently enhance marine primary production. Over the coastal seas of China, as the transport of NOy from land becomes weaker due to the decrease in anthropogenic emissions, the effect of ship emissions and lightning emissions becomes more important. On average, the seasonal mean contribution of ship emissions to total NOy deposition is projected to be enhanced by 24 %–48 % and 3 %–37 % over the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, respectively, by the end of this century. Therefore, continued control of both anthropogenic emissions over land and ship emissions may reduce NOy deposition to the Chinese coastal seas.


Introduction
As a nutrient, nitrogen is essential to the terrestrial and marine ecosystems and plays vital roles in human health (Galloway et al., 2008), biodiversity (Butchart et al., 2010), primary production (PP) (Doney et al., 2007;Stevens et al., 2015), etc.The oceans comprise the largest and most important ecosystems on Earth and atmospheric nitrogen deposi-Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.
tion is an important pathway for delivering nutrients to the ocean (Duce et al., 2008).
The characteristics of atmospheric deposition have been widely studied around the world.The concentrations and fluxes of trace elements in atmospheric deposition are influenced by many factors such as rainfall amount, local emissions, long-range transport of pollutants, etc. (Kim et al., 2000(Kim et al., , 2012;;Cong et al., 2010;Theodosi et al., 2010;Vuai and Tokuyama, 2011;Connan et al., 2013;Montoya-Mayor et al., 2013).Studies have shown significant changes of nitrogen deposition in the future under the influence of changes in both climate and emissions following the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) (Van Vuuren et al., 2011;Ellis et al., 2013;Lamarque et al., 2013a).
Since projections of future changes in nitrogen deposition from individual models are prone to specific model errors (Reichler and Kim, 2008;Shindell et al., 2013), multi-model ensembles of either climate (Gao et al., 2014(Gao et al., , 2016) ) or chemistry (Lamarque et al., 2013a, b) are important for identifying robust and non-robust changes projected by models.This study uses the nitrogen deposition from an ensemble of models that contributed to the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP; Lamarque et al., 2013b).The nitrogen deposition includes both the oxidized nitrogen deposition (NO y , mainly including NO, NO 2 , NO − 3 , N 2 O 5 , HNO 3 , HNO 4 and organic nitrates) and reduced nitrogen (NH x , mainly including NH 3 , NH + 4 and organic ammonium).Since the number of models with NH x in ACCMIP is less than five, this study only focuses on the NO y (10 models or so) deposition, which mainly results from NO x emissions.
Due to rapid economic development in China, NO x emission increase in the past (Wang et al., 2013) has led to an increase in nitrogen deposition.For example, Liu et al. (2013) found that nitrogen deposition over land in China increased from 13.2 kg ha −1 in the 1980s to 21.1 kg ha −1 in the 2000s, with an increase of 60 %.In addition, the increased NO x emissions may also enhance NO y deposition in Chinese coastal seas due to the atmospheric and riverine transport of NO x (Luo et al., 2014).In particular, China has a long coastline of almost 18 000 km in length and over 300 million km 2 sea areas, with high-density population and industries in the coastal provinces.For NO x emissions over the oceans, shipping emissions are the dominant contributor (Dalsøren et al., 2009;Eyring et al., 2010).Lauer et al. (2007) discussed the significant impact of shipping emissions on aerosols such as aerosol nitrate burden, implying potentially subsequent influence on nitrogen deposition.Fan et al. (2016) concluded that 85 % of ship emissions took place within 200 km of the coastlines, indicating a stronger influence of ship emissions on coastal seas than remote areas.Liu et al. (2016) reported that the shipping NO x emissions in East Asia increased from 1.08 Tg in 2002 to 2.8 Tg in 2013, accounting for nearly 9 % of total NO x emissions in East Asia and 16.5 % of global shipping NO x emissions.In ACCMIP, the NO x emissions over the ocean mainly come from shipping, with a much smaller amount from aircraft as well as lightning since lightning NO x is concentrated in the tropical land areas (Price et al., 1997).
Studies on the changes of nitrogen deposition under the influence of both climate and emission changes have been limited over East Asia.Using the old Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) such as A2, Lamarque et al. (2005) found large increases in nitrogen deposition over East Asia due to increased emissions, whereas the effect from climate change is much smaller and lacks consensus due to the small ensemble size.In 2100 nitrogen deposition changes due to changes in climate are much less than changes due to increased nitrogen emissions.In contrast, based on the new scenarios RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, Lamarque et al. (2013a) found that the total NO y deposition (wet + dry; Fig. 5a in Lamarque et al., 2013a) over East Asia was projected to decrease by the end of this century due to the combined effect of emissions and climate, but the changes are mainly triggered by the decrease in emissions.However, the individual effect of climate or emissions was not examined in that study.With the same dataset of ACCMIP, Allen et al. (2015) found that by keeping the emissions at the current level, aerosol wet deposition decreases over the land areas of the tropics and Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes due to the decrease in large-scale precipitation, subsequently enhancing the increase in wet deposition over the ocean through the transport effect.Climate change alone may modulate the changes in the deposition, particularly for wet deposition due to the response of precipitation to climate change.Hence, it is important to elucidate the influence of climate and emission changes on dry and wet NO y deposition over East Asia using the multi-model ensemble ACCMIP results.
In what follows, we first discuss the capability of ACCMIP in capturing the deposition patterns, followed by the changes of dry and wet deposition in the future under the combined effect of climate change and emissions.Lastly, we elucidate the individual effect from climate change or emissions.

Model description
In this study, about 10 models from ACCMIP are used, similar to Lamarque et al. (2013b).All the data are interpolated to a spatial resolution of 2 • × 2 • to facilitate analysis and comparison across models.To evaluate the impacts of climate and emission change as well as to isolate their individual effect, five cases of ACCMIP scenarios are used in this study, as listed in Table 1.The base case over the historical period covers the decade of 2000, mainly from 2001 to 2010.Two cases target the investigation of both climate and emission changes under future scenarios of RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, covering two periods in the decades of 2030 and 2100 (first column of Table 1).The remaining two cases are used to investigate the impact from climate change only in the 2030s and  S1 (in the Supplement).In the ACCMIP dataset, the summation of all simulated oxidized nitrogen species is referred to as NO y , which is the major focus of this study.

Evaluation of the ACCMIP results
The deposition results of ACCMIP have been extensively evaluated previously across land areas by comparing with three datasets including the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP), European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia (EANET), and reasonable performance was demonstrated by the ACCMIP results (Lamarque et al., 2013a).There is a lack of deposition data over the ocean, making evaluation of the ACCMIP results across the oceans difficult.Recently, Baker et al. (2017) conducted an intensive evaluation of the ACCMIP multi-model mean based on a large number of dry NO y deposition samples, i.e., a total of 770 samples collected over the Pacific, showing comparable spatial distributions between observations and AC-CMIP, such as a consistent northwest-southeast gradient with higher deposition flux closer to the coast (Fig. 12 in Baker et al., 2017).In terms of wet deposition, considering the close relationship between wet deposition and precipitation (Kryza et al., 2012;Wałaszek et al., 2013), evaluation of precipitation is performed using the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM; http://pmm.nasa.gov/trmm,last access: 18 January 2019) and Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) v2.3 (Adler et al., 2018) precipitation data.Figure 1 shows a comparison of the annual mean precipitation over the historical period (2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) among the ACCMIP multi-model ensemble mean, TRMM, which only covers 60 • N-60 • S, and GPCP.In general, the AC-CMIP mean precipitation captures the spatial variations in the observed precipitation from both TRMM and GPCP well, with stronger precipitation in the southern part of Asia, particularly over the South China Sea and the Bay of Bengal, and lighter precipitation in northern China (i.e., northwest China).In particular, the rain belt stretching from the east of Japan to the Philippines in summer is also well captured by ACCMIP.To further illustrate the uncertainties among different models, the standard deviation of seasonal mean precipitation across all ACCMIP models over East Asia is shown in Fig. S1 (in the Supplement), within 1-2 mm day −1 over Chinese coastal seas.
4 Future changes of NO y deposition in East Asia Considering the uncertainty and variability among multiple ACCMIP results, all analyses, i.e., the future changes of deposition, are performed based on model agreement and statistical significance.Following our previous studies (Gao et al., 2014(Gao et al., , 2015)), results at a model grid cell are considered to have agreement if at least 70 % of the ACCMIP models show the same sign of change as the ACCMIP multi-model ensemble mean.For models showing agreement with the ensemble mean, if more than half of the models show statistical significance at the 95 % level, then the ensemble mean change for that particular grid is considered to be statistically significant.
The seasonal mean distribution of dry NO y deposition over East Asia areas for historical (2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) and projected future changes under RCP scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) during the two periods of 2030 and 2100 are shown in Fig. 2. The four seasons defined in this study are spring (March-May), summer (June-August), fall (September-November) and winter (December-February).Regional mean changes over the BYE (Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea and East China Sea) areas are shown in each panel, calculated from multi-model mean results.The corresponding standard deviations of multiple models are shown in Table S2.
As anthropogenic activities play important roles in NO x emissions, high atmospheric dry nitrogen (NO y ) deposition values mainly cluster around areas with high population density and industrial activities in the historical periods (Fig. 2a), e.g., high values of NO y deposition can be seen in east China, Korea, Japan and their coastal seas.In this study, in addition to the land areas, we also focus on three coastal seas in East Asia (BYE areas), marked by the three pink boxes in Fig. 2a.A gradient of decreasing NO y deposition is found (Fig. 2a) from eastern China to the coastal areas.Seasonal variations show that over mainland China summer is the season with the highest dry and wet NO y deposition, with high dry deposition likely caused by the high deposition velocity (Zhang et al., 2017) and wet deposition due to more precipitation in summer, consistent with previous studies (Liu et al., 2017;  Zhang et al., 2017;Xu et al., 2018).Over the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, the notably higher NO y deposition (first row of Fig. 2) is partly attributed to NO x emissions transported from land to the coastal seas.In particular, the dry NO y deposition over the East China Sea is obviously higher in winter compared to summer, likely resulting from enhanced transport by the northwesterly winds during the winter monsoon (Ding, 1993).
Considering the projected future changes of NO y deposition, we show the distributions in the 2030s and 2100s under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, representing near-term and long-term changes.Dry NO y deposition decreases remarkably in the 2100s under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios over East Asia, a result of a large decrease in emissions (second column in Fig. S2).In the 2030s, in addition to the decrease in dry deposition in Japan, Korea and the surrounding areas, RCP8.5 shows a predominant increase in dry deposition (Fig. 2d); in contrast, robust significant increases in western China and India are projected, with few or weak signals in eastern China in RCP4.5, consistent with the emission change patterns (first column in Fig. S2).
For wet NO y deposition, as discussed earlier, summer is the season with the strongest deposition (Fig. 3a), primarily caused by the highest precipitation among the four seasons (Fig. 1).In the 2030s, changes of wet deposition (Fig. 3b,  d) are, in general, similar to the patterns of dry deposition changes (Fig. 2b, d), with standard deviation of wet deposition shown in Table S3.In the 2100s, the patterns of wet deposition changes are different from those of dry deposition, with relatively clear east-west dipole features, in particular under RCP8.5.To elucidate what controls the dipole patterns, the individual effect of climate change and emissions is discussed in the next section.1), where F is vertical dry deposition flux, C is concentration of specific gas or particle and v d is the dry deposition velocity.
All models in ACCMIP calculated dry deposition velocity using the resistance approach (Lamarque et al., 2013b), which defines the inverse of dry deposition velocity as Eq. ( 2), where r t is the total resistance, r a is the aerodynamic resistance, which is common to all gases, r b is the quasilaminar sublayer resistance and r c is the bulk surface resistance (Steinfeld, 1998).As r b depends on the molecular properties of the target substance and deposition surface and r c depends on the nature of the surface (Steinfeld, 1998), they do not vary under climate change.As for r a , it plays a significant role in transporting gases and particles from the atmosphere to the receptor surface.R a is governed by atmospheric turbulent transport, mainly controlled by the wind shear as well as buoyancy (Erisman and Draaijers, 2003).Therefore, climate change affects dry deposition velocity for the gases or particles mainly through its modulation of r a .As shown in Fig. 4, the changes of dry depositions from climate change alone are mostly negligible compared to the total changes from both climate change and emissions (Fig. 2), indicating statistically insignificant change of r a under a warmer climate.
Considering the impact of climate conditions on NO y deposition, precipitation is an important factor and has been shown to positively correlate with wet NO y deposition (Kryza et al., 2012;Wałaszek et al., 2013).In order to further quantify the relationship between wet deposition and precipitation, we display in Fig. 5 the correlation between the changes of precipitation and wet NO y deposition over the BYE areas for the scenarios with fixed emissions.All correlations are positive and statistically significant.There is a larger inter-model spread of changes in Em2000Cl2100 compared to Em2000Cl2030, and the larger changes in precipitation and wet deposition allow a stronger correlation between them to emerge in the 2100s relative to the 2030s.Meanwhile, winter shows the highest correlation in both Em2000Cl2030 and Em2000Cl2100, partly related to the significant decrease in both wet NO y deposition and precipitation in winter under Em2000Cl2100 over the East China Sea, which will be discussed in detail next.
As depicted in Fig. 6, the changes of wet deposition in the 2030s due to climate change are mostly insignificant (Fig. 6a) and correspond well with the insignificant changes of precipitation (Fig. 6c).Similarly, the patterns in the 2100s between the changes of wet deposition (Fig. 6b) and precipitation (Fig. 6d) are quite consistent.For example, in spring, summer and fall, a dominant increase in western China is projected (first three panels in Fig. 6b,d), whereas in winter a north and southeastern dipole feature is clearly seen.From the global perspective, the emissions of nitrogen oxide are, in general, balanced by the NO y deposition as documented in Lamarque et al. (2013a) using the ACCMIP model results, although NO y deposition might be larger due to the downward transport from the stratosphere.For a particular region, the NO y deposition can be considered to be the contribution of both local NO x emissions such as shipping and lightning as well as transport from the East Asian continent.Therefore, we calculate the multi-model seasonal mean NO y deposition and NO x emissions from shipping and lightning.As was documented by Liu et al. (2016), ship emissions from the East China Sea may account for a large percentage (31 %) of the total ship emissions in East Asia, indicating the strong effect of ship emissions over Chinese coastal seas.To avoid biases from spatial interpolation, calculation is performed based on the original model grid and regionally averaged for each model.Since the changes in the Bohai Sea are less significant in general, particularly in the near future (Figs. 2b,3b), we only focus on the emission and deposition changes over the Yellow Sea and East China Sea.Summary of shipping and lightning NO x emissions over the Yellow Sea and East China Sea under historical, RCP and other scenarios is listed in Table S4.Overall, lightning emissions are much smaller than shipping emissions.In the future, seasonal mean shipping emissions increase in the 2030s, in particular under RCP8.5, and decrease in the 2100s under both RCP scenarios, whereas the changes of lightning emissions are small except in summer, with a mean increase of 73 % over the Yellow Sea and East China Sea.Based on NO x emissions and NO y deposition, the percentage of dry and wet deposition, as well as the ratio of ship emissions and lightning emissions to the total NO y deposition are shown in Figs.7 and 8.The ratio of ship emissions and lightning emissions to the total NO y deposition is used to characterize their contribution to NO y deposition with the assumption that all ship and lightning emissions contribute to the NO y deposition, which can be considered an upper bound of their contribution.
A couple of features can be identified from Figs. 7 and 8. First, total NO y deposition was shown as the green dashed line, with all values consistent with the spatial distributions in Figs.2-4.By the end of this century (2100), total NO y deposition decreases substantially under both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, whereas in the 2030s, total deposition shows a dramatic increase in RCP8.5 but moderate change in RCP4.5 (slight decrease in the Yellow Sea and increase in the East China Sea).The percentage of dry deposition over the Yellow Sea and East China Sea (third and fifth blue color bars from the left in each panel of Figs. 7, 8) decreases in the 2100s under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, consistent with the patterns shown in Figs.2c, e and 3c, e, due primarily to emission reduction.Second, despite the decrease in shipping emis-sions in the 2100s, the contribution of ship emissions to total NO y deposition increases substantially under both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 over the Yellow Sea and East China Sea (black color bars in Figs. 7, 8), due primarily to the larger emission reduction over land (e.g., eastern China) compared to ocean (Fig. S2).For instance, over the historical period, the seasonal contribution of ship emissions to total NO y deposition is 22 %-30 % and 52 %-82 % for the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, respectively; however, in the 2100s, it reaches 56 %-99 % (RCP4.5)and 42 %-58 % (RCP8.5)for the Yellow Sea and 81 % to almost 100 % (RCP4.5)and 74 % to almost 100 % (RCP8.5)for the East China Sea, with a mean seasonal increase of 24 %-48 % and 3 %-37 % for the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, respectively.Third, the contribution of lightning NO x in spring and winter is negligible; however, the contribution is nontrivial in summer and fall (orange bars in Figs. 7, 8).In particular, due to the reduction in anthropogenic emissions over land and ship emissions in the 2100s under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 (Fig. S2) along with the increase in lightning NO x emissions over Chinese coastal seas (Table S4), the contribution of lightning NO x becomes more obvious compared with the case without emission reduction.For example, in summer in the 2100s, the contribution of lightning NO x increases from 1 % to 7 % (both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) over the Yellow Sea and 3 %-7 % in RCP4.5 and 6 % in RCP8.5 over the East China Sea.In fall in the 2100s, the contribution of lightning NO x increases from less than 1 % to 3 % (both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) over the Yellow Sea and from 1 % to 4 % (both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) in the East China Sea.These results illustrate a shift in the future towards enhanced impact from ship and lightning emissions when anthropogenic emissions are largely controlled in the upwind land regions.
6 Marine primary production over the BYE areas and its future change Generally, the Chinese coastal seas have rich nutrients and high total PP (Gong et al., 2000;Son et al., 2005).Thus, these areas seldom lack nutrients but sometimes eutrophication is an environmental issue.For instance, a massive Ulva prolifera bloom occurred in June 2008 in the Yellow Sea and the harmful algal bloom garnered a lot of attention.Hu et al. (2010) found that algal blooms occur in each summer of 2000-2009 in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea.Atmospheric deposition is an important source of nutrients for the marine ecosystem, and it can facilitate PP in the ocean surface and contribute to the development of harmful algal blooms (Paerl, 1997;Paerl et al., 2002).
Several previous studies have investigated PP over the BYE areas and estimated the historical annual PP to be 97, 236 and 145 g C m −2 yr −1 , respectively, for the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea and East China Sea (Guan et al., 2005;Gong et al., 2003).In this study, based on the assumption that all NO y   deposited into the surface ocean can be absorbed by phytoplankton, we estimate the model-averaged PP from NO y deposition in the historical period over the BYE areas according to the Redfield ratio (Tett et al., 1985).The Redfield ratio refers to the ratios of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in phytoplankton listed in Eq. (3).Equation ( 4) is used to calculate PP generated from NO y deposition, for which PP noy represents the PP from NO y deposition and NO y represents total NO y (wet + dry) deposition.(Steinacher et al., 2010;Koga et al., 2011;Laufkötter et al., 2015;Cabré et al., 2015).For instance, based on multi-model ensembles, Cabré et al. (2015) found a general global decrease (up to 30 %) in total PP projected under RCP8.5 by the end of this century.We calculate the seasonal PP from NO y using ACCMIP, with results shown in Fig. 9.It should be noted that Fig. 9b refers to the percentage changes of total NO y deposition.According to the Redfield ratio, PP from NO y is proportional to total NO y deposition, yielding the same percentage change between PP and NO y .Therefore, the values in the ocean (Fig. 9) also represent the changes of PP resulting from NO y deposition.Note that PP in Fig. 9a is the equivalent PP converted from NO y deposited into the ocean through nutrient uptake by phytoplankton.Due to low sea surface temperature in winter, the conversion can hardly happen and the nutrients may remain until spring (Reay et al., 1999).Therefore, actual PP from NO y may shift from winter to spring instead.Moreover, as the Redfield ratio is used to estimate PP from NO y under all scenarios, potential influence of changes in other nutrients (e.g., carbon and phosphorus) under RCP scenarios and experimental scenarios is not considered.Under RCP scenarios, consistent with the change patterns of total NO y deposition (not shown), PP from NO y decreases significantly over the BYE areas in the 2100s, by 60 %-68 % and 34 %-63 % in the four seasons over the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, respectively, under RCP8.5 (Fig. 9c, e).However, in the 2030s, PP from NO y shows an increase over the BYE areas under RCP8.5 (e.g., 32 %-53 % in the Yellow Sea and 19 %-34 % in East China Sea; Fig. 9d), with a smaller increase or decrease under RCP4.5 (Fig. 9b).The large increase in NO y in the near future suggests the increased risk of algal blooms if emissions continue to increase, and the reduction in NO y in 2100 indicates the importance of emission reduction in the long term.Without emission reduction, PP from NO y is projected to increase in 2100s during summer (Fig. 9g) over the East China Sea, consistent with the wet deposition pattern change depicted in Fig. 6, indicating that climate change increases eutrophication through enhancement of precipitation that increases wet deposition over this region.Hence our results illustrate the importance of reducing emissions and PP in the BYE areas in the future.

Conclusions and discussions
Atmospheric NO y deposition over East Asia is analyzed to delineate the influence of climate and emission changes based on the ACCMIP multi-model ensemble.Under both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios with the combined effect of climate and emission changes, both dry and wet NO y deposition shows significant decreases in the 2100s, primarily as a result of a large reduction in anthropogenic emissions.In the 2030s, both the dry and wet NO y deposition increases significantly, particularly under RCP8.5, mainly because of enhanced emissions.The individual effect of climate change and emissions on the dry and wet NO y deposition is also identified, showing a relatively minor impact of climate change on dry NO y deposition.In terms of wet deposition, the spatial patterns are in general consistent with those in the changes of precipitation, particularly at the end of this century.Take the East China Sea as an example, wet NO y deposition increases significantly in summer (18 %) and decreases significantly in winter (−13 %).While climate change alone generally increases wet deposition, reduction of emissions has a dominant influence of reducing wet deposition over east China.
Over the Chinese coastal seas such as the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, with decreasing transport of NO x from mainland China due to emission reduction, shipping and lightning emissions from the ocean become the major source of NO y deposition, with a mean seasonal increase of 24 %-48 % and 3 %-37 % for the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, respectively.Therefore, reducing shipping emissions in the Chinese coastal areas is a key factor to reduce nitrogen deposition in the future.
In the 2030s, PP from NO y shows increases over the BYE areas under RCP8.5, suggesting the increased risk of algal blooms if emissions from ships continue to increase in the near future (Liu et al., 2016).With climate change only, PP from NO y is projected to increase in 2100 during summer over the East China Sea, indicating a supportive role of climate change on eutrophication, and hence the importance of emission controls.
Although the ACCMIP multi-model ensemble has provided valuable information for projecting future changes in NO y deposition, the models used in ACCMIP have relatively coarse spatial resolution for resolving the complex meteorological and chemical processes.Dynamical downscaling may be applied in the future to further investigate the impact of climate and emission on nitrogen deposition over East Asia and the detailed processes involved.For analysis of marine PP, we used a very simple approach that ignores biogeochemical processes in the ocean.An ocean biogeochemistry model will be useful to further quantify the effect of climate and emissions on PP.
Data availability.The ACCMIP data used in this study are available at the British Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (http:// badc.nerc.ac.uk/browse/badc/accmip; last access: 20 January 2019, Shindell et al., 2011).
Author contributions.YG came up with the original idea of investigating the impact of climate and emission on atmospheric deposition.YG and KL designed the analysis method.JZ conducted all the analyses.LRL, HL, JF, XY and HG helped in the discussion of the results.JFL helped in the interpretation and understanding of AC-CMIP data.TN helped in the interpretation of the MIROC-CHEM model.All the authors contributed to the writing of the paper.
Competing interests.The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

5
The impact of climate change or emissions on NO y deposition Two scenarios from ACCMIP are used in this study to isolate the influence of anthropogenic emissions and climate change on NO y deposition.The two scenarios are shown in Table 1, with emissions kept at the current level (the decade of 2000s) but climate for the 2030s and 2100s under RCP8.5 are compared.Climate change alone has negligible contributions to the dry NO y deposition changes, as shown in Fig.4.Generally, calculation of dry deposition flux in chemical models follows Eq. (

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of mean seasonal dry NO y deposition over East Asia under historical (2001-2010; a) as well as future changes.Panels (b)-(e) represent changes under RCP4.5 2030s, RCP4.5 2100s, RCP8.5 2030s and RCP8.5 2100s relative to the historical period.Only grids with multi-model agreement are shown (grids without model agreement are in white), and stippling marks areas with statistical significance (t test; α = 0.05).Regions of the Bohai Sea (BS), Yellow Sea (YS) and East China Sea (ES) are marked by the pink rectangles in the top left panel, with mean changes shown on the top left of each panel in (b)-(e).Only grids with significant change in the ocean areas are calculated.The mean change of a region is set to nan if the number of significant grids in this region is fewer than half of the area.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Same as Fig. 2 except for wet NO y deposition.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of mean seasonal dry NO y deposition change over East Asia under experimental scenarios of ACCMIP (Em2000Cl2030 and Em2000Cl2100) relative to the historical period (2001-2010).The distribution of mean seasonal dry NO y deposition under the historical period is shown in Fig. 2a.Only grids with multi-model agreement are shown (grids without model agreement are in white), and among the grids with model agreement, stippling marks statistical significance (α = 0.05).

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.Comparison between precipitation and wet NO y deposition changes under the experimental scenarios of ACCMIP (Em2000Cl2030 and Em2000Cl2100) relative to the historical period (2001-2010) over the Bohai Sea (red points), Yellow Sea (blue points) and East China Sea (black points).An r test (α = 0.05) is performed in each panel for statistical significance and the star before "R" indicates statistical significance at the 95 % confidence level.Each point in this figure corresponds to the results from an individual model of ACCMIP.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Spatial distribution of mean seasonal wet NO y deposition change and precipitation change under EM2000Cl2030 and Em2000Cl2100 relative to the historical period (2001-2010).The panels are drawn and arranged in the same manner as Fig. 2.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Stacked bars of the seasonal ratio of NO y deposition from wet (wetnoy) and dry (drynoy) deposition and NO x emissions from shipping (emisnox) and lightning (emilnox) to the total (wet + dry) NO y deposition in the historical and RCP scenarios over the Yellow Sea.Two color bars are shown for each period with the left one representing dry NO y (blue) and wet NO y (red) deposition and the right one representing emisnox (black) and emilnox (orange).A green dashed line representing total NO y deposition is added to each panel with the y axis on the right.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Same as Fig. 7 except for the East China Sea.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Panel (a) shows spatial distribution of marine primary production resulting from NO y deposition over East Asia in historical periods.Areas over land are blank because the Redfield ratio is only applied to the ocean areas.The spatial distributions in (b)-(g) refer to the percentage change of total NO y deposition for all RCP scenarios and other scenarios used in this study.Values in the ocean areas can be seen as changes of PP from NO y based on the definition of the Redfield ratio.In (b)-(g) all distributions are the percentage change compared to the historical period and only values with agreement are shown.Values with statistical significance (α = 0.05) are marked with a black dot.

Table 1 .
Scenarios used in this study.