<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-8189-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Effects of organic coating on the nitrate formation by suppressing the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis: a case study during wintertime in
Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH)</article-title><alt-title>Effects of organic coating on nitrate formation</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Effects of organic coating on nitrate formation}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L. Liu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Lang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Jiarui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Suixin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Xia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Jiamao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Tian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Qian</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>Junji</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tie</surname><given-names>Xuexi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Guohui</given-names></name>
          <email>ligh@ieecas.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Key Lab of Aerosol Chemistry and Physics, SKLLQG, Institute of Earth Environment,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment
&amp; Environmental Standards Institute,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100021, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>CAS Center for Excellence in Quaternary Science and Global Change,
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Guohui Li (ligh@ieecas.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>24</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>8189</fpage><lpage>8207</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>30</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>31</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e203">Although stringent emission mitigation strategies have
been carried out since 2013 in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH), China, heavy
haze with high levels of fine particulate matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) still
frequently engulfs the region during wintertime and the nitrate contribution
to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass has progressively increased. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
heterogeneous hydrolysis is the most important pathway of nitrate
formation at nighttime. In the present study, the WRF-Chem model is applied
to simulate a heavy haze episode from 10 to 27 February 2014 in BTH to
evaluate contributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis to
nitrate formation and effects of organic coating. The model generally
performs reasonably well in simulating meteorological parameters, air
pollutants, and aerosol species against observations in BTH.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis with all the secondary organic
aerosol assumed to be involved in coating considerably improves the nitrate
simulations compared to the measurements in Beijing. On average, organic
coating decreases nitrate concentrations by 8.4 % in BTH during an
episode, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis with organic
coating contributes about 30.1 % of nitrate concentrations. Additionally,
the reaction also plays a considerable role in the heavy haze formation,
with a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution of about 11.6 % in BTH. Sensitivity studies
also reveal that future studies need to be conducted to predict the organic
aerosol hygroscopicity for accurately representing the organic coating
effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e325">Within recent decades, China has been suffering from pervasive and
persistent haze pollution caused by elevated levels of fine particulate
matters (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), particularly in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) (Guo et
al., 2014; Gao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016). Numerous studies have
revealed that the inorganic aerosols, including nitrate, sulfate, and
ammonium, are the most abundant component of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during haze
pollution episodes in BTH, and that the evolution of the haze pollution is
characterized by the formation of substantial amounts of sulfate and
nitrate (Sun et al., 2013, 2015; Zhang et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2013). Since 2013, several aggressive emission control
strategies have been implemented in China, including desulfurization and
dedusting for coal combustion, vehicle restriction and execution of stringent
emission standards in key industries (Tao et al., 2017). However, the
control of emissions of nitrate gaseous precursors does not seem to be
effective since many observations have shown that the nitrate aerosol
concentration has progressively increased in<?pagebreak page8190?> recent several years (Zhang
et al., 2012, 2015; Sun et al., 2015; Tao et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e346">In the atmosphere, nitrate aerosol is formed via nitrous acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to
balance the inorganic cations in the aerosol phase. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is produced
through four pathways (Kim et al., 2014): (1) the reaction of OH and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (main gas-phase pathway and usually considered the daytime
pathway because the OH radical is severely limited at night due to lack of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and peroxide photolysis), (2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical reaction with
hydrocarbons, (3) aqueous reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and (4) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conversion to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with subsequently
heterogeneous chemical conversion to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The last pathway is
referred to as the most important pathway during nighttime since both
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are photolytically liable, or even under a heavy
haze situation with weak sunlight and high relative humidity (RH) (Brown
et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e493">The heterogeneous hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the surface of
deliquescent aerosols to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is quantified by the reaction
probability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Bertram and Thornton, 2009; Chen et
al., 2018; Davis et al., 2008; Riemer et al., 2003). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
has been measured by previous laboratory experiments, dependent on
particulate chemical composition, RH, temperature, aerosol surface area, and
water content (Chang et al., 2011), and on the order of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zheng et al., 2015). In modeling studies, various parameterizations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are used to simulate the nitrate formation.
Dentener and Crutzen (1993) first used 0.1 as the representative
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a three-dimensional global model. Riemer et al. (2003) developed a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterization on the
surface of aerosols containing sulfate and nitrate (hereafter referred to as
Riemer03), which has widely been used and further improved in air quality
models. Davis et al. (2008) implemented a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
parameterization on the surface of particles containing sulfate, nitrate, and
ammonium as a function of RH, temperature, and phase state to improve
simulations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis. Bertram and Thornton (2009)
developed a parameterization to consider the influence of chloride salts on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of RH.</p>
      <p id="d1e692">The coating of particles by organic materials has been reported to inhibit
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake (Anttila et al., 2006) and suggested as a possible
explanation for field observations of suppressed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
(Brown et al., 2006). Evans and Jacob (2005) have incorporated a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterization on surfaces of sulfate particles as a
function of RH and temperature into the GEOS-CHEM model, including the
effects of dust, sea salt, sulfate, elemental carbon, and organic carbon but
ignoring nitrogen-containing species. Riemer et al. (2009)
developed a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake parameterization (Riemer09) based on the
laboratory results of Anttila et al. (2006), which combines
nitrogen-containing and organic effects on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis. The
parameterization has been used to estimate the maximum effect of organic
coating by assuming that all available secondary organic compounds (SOCs)
contribute to the coating in a 3-D model. The results show that SOC could
suppress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake significantly, reducing particulate nitrate
concentrations by up to 90 %. Lowe et al. (2015) further combined
the organic coating and chloride salt effects on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the WRF-Chem model. Most recently, Chen et al. (2018) developed a new
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterization with respect to RH, temperature, and
aerosol composition, showing that organic coating effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not as important as expected over western and central
Europe. However, there is still a lack of modeling studies focused on the
effect of organic coating on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and particulate nitrate
formation in China. Wang et al. (2017) evaluated the potential
particulate nitrate formation through the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis reaction
without considering the organic coating effect during a haze pollution
episode in Beijing, and found that the observed nitrate concentration (20.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average) is lower than the assessment (57.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average). Considering the high organic aerosol concentration and
increasing trend of particulate nitrate during haze days in BTH, it is
imperative to assess the effect of organic coating on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
hydrolysis and its consequent contribution to nitrate formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e950">In the present study, based on Riemer09 parameterization, the contribution
of the organic coating effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis to nitrate
formation is investigated using the WRF-Chem model. The model configuration
and methodology are described in Sect. 2. Results and sensitivity studies
are presented in Sect. 3. Discussion and summary are given in Sect. 4.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Model and methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>WRF-Chem model and configuration</title>
      <p id="d1e984">A modified version of the WRF-Chem model (Grell et al., 2005) is used in
this study, which is developed by Li et al. (2010, 2011a, b, 2012) at
the Molina Center for Energy and the Environment. A new flexible gas-phase
chemical module has been developed and implemented into the version of the
WRF-Chem model, which can be utilized with different chemical mechanisms,
including CBIV, RADM2, and SAPRC. The gas-phase chemistry is solved by an
Eulerian backward Gauss–Seidel iterative technique with a number of
iterations, inherited from NCAR-HANK (Hess et al., 2000). In the study, the
SAPRC99 chemical mechanism is used based on the available emission
inventory. For the aerosol simulations, the CMAQ/Models-3 aerosol module
(AERO5) developed by U.S. EPA has incorporated into the model (Binkowski and
Roselle, 2003). Briefly, wet deposition uses the method in the CMAQ
module and dry deposition of chemical species is parameterized following
Wesely (1989). The photolysis rates are calculated using the Fast
Tropospheric Ultraviolet and Visible (FTUV) radiation model (Tie et al.,
2003; Li et al., 2005), with the aerosol and cloud effects on the
photochemistry (Li et al., 2011a).</p>
      <?pagebreak page8191?><p id="d1e987"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>ISORROPIA (version 1.7) is used to predict the thermodynamic equilibrium
between the ammonia–sulfate–nitrate–chloride–water aerosols and their gas-phase precursors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–HCl–water vapor (Nenes et al., 1998). It
is worth noting that the most recent extension of ISORROPIA, known as
ISORROPIA II, has incorporated a larger number of aerosol species (Ca, Mn, K
salts) and is designed to be a superset of ISORROPIA (Fountoukis and Nenes,
2007). Considering that crustal species are not considered in the study,
ISORROPIA (version 1.7) is still used to calculate inorganic components and
ISORROPIA II is imperative to be incorporated into the WRF-Chem model in
future studies. In addition, a parameterization of sulfate heterogeneous
formation involving aerosol liquid water (ALW) has been developed and
implemented into the model, which has successfully reproduced the observed
rapid sulfate formation during haze days (Li et al., 2017). The sulfate
heterogeneous formation from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is parameterized as a first-order
irreversible uptake by ALW surfaces, with a reactive uptake coefficient of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assuming that there is enough alkalinity to maintain
the high iron-catalyzed reaction rate.</p>
      <p id="d1e1058">The organic aerosol (OA) module is based on the volatility basis set (VBS) approach with aging and detailed
information can be found in Li et al. (2011b). The POA components from
traffic-related combustion and biomass burning are represented by nine
surrogate species with saturation concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ranging from 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at room temperature (Shrivastava et al., 2008),
and assumed to be semi-volatile and photochemically reactive (Robinson et
al., 2007). The secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from each anthropogenic or biogenic precursor
is calculated using four semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with effective saturation
concentrations of 1, 10, 100, and 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 298 K. The SOA
formation via the heterogeneous reaction of glyoxal and methylglyoxal is
parameterized as a first-order irreversible uptake by aerosol particles with
an uptake coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Liggio et al., 2005; Zhao
et al., 2006; Volkamer et al., 2007). The OA module has reasonably
reproduced the POA and SOA concentration against measurements, and detailed
model performance can be found in Li et al. (2011b), Feng et al. (2016), and
Xing et al. (2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e1152">The anthropogenic emission inventory with a horizontal resolution of 6 km is
developed by Zhang et al. (2009), with the base year of 2013, including
industry, transportation, power plant, residential, and agriculture sources.
The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN) is used to
calculate the biogenic emissions online (Guenther et al., 2006).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1159">WRF-Chem model configurations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Regions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 to 27  February  2014</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Domain size</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Domain center</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">38.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Horizontal resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vertical resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35 vertical levels with a stretched vertical grid with spacing ranging from</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30 m near the surface, to 500 m at 2.5 km and 1 km above 14 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Microphysics scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WSM six-class graupel scheme (Hong and Lim, 2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Boundary layer scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MYJ TKE scheme (Janjić, 2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface layer scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MYJ surface scheme (Janjić, 2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Land-surface scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Unified Noah land-surface model (Chen and Dudhia, 2001)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Longwave radiation scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Goddard longwave scheme (Chou et al., 2001)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shortwave radiation scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Goddard shortwave scheme (Chou and Suarez, 1999)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Meteorological boundary and initial conditions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NCEP 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reanalysis data</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chemical initial and boundary conditions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MOZART 6 h output (Horowitz et al., 2003)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Anthropogenic emission inventory</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SAPRC-99 chemical mechanism emissions (Zhang et al., 2009)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Biogenic emission inventory</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MEGAN model developed by Guenther et al. (2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model spin-up time</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24 h</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1400">A heavy haze episode from 10 to 27 February 2014 in BTH is simulated in
association with the field observation of air pollutants and secondary
inorganic aerosols. Detailed model configuration can be found in Table 1 and
the simulation domain is presented in Fig. 1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1405">WRF-Chem simulation domain with topography. The red filled circles
show the locations of the cities with ambient air quality monitoring sites,
and the size of the circles represents the number of sites in each city. The
blue filled rectangle denotes the CRAES observation site in Beijing.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/8189/2019/acp-19-8189-2019-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Parameterization of the heterogeneous hydrolysis of
{$\protect\chem{N_{{2}}O_{{5}}}$}}?><title>Parameterization of the heterogeneous hydrolysis of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e1438">The reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis on the surface of
deliquescent aerosols to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be represented as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M75" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          This reaction is usually implemented into air quality transport models as a
first-order loss:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in the atmosphere.
The loss rate constant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is parameterized in the
following way:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M80" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
average molecular velocity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the available aerosol
surface area density.</p>
      <p id="d1e1744">In this study, the parameterization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> follows Riemer03 and
Riemer09. In the parameterization, primary emission compounds such as
elemental carbon, insoluble organic matter (mostly part of POA), insoluble
inorganic matter, and mineral dust particles are assumed to serve as a nucleus of
aerosols. Condensation of soluble chemical components and further water
vapor on the surface of the nucleus forms an aqueous layer. The nucleus and
the aqueous<?pagebreak page8192?> layer are assumed to be a unified “core” (aqueous core) in the Riemer03
and Riemer09 parameterizations. In the Riemer03 parameterization, soluble
inorganic components including sulfate and nitrate are taken into
consideration for suppressing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis
uptake in the aqueous core, and the parameterization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M91" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the aerosol mass concentrations
of soluble sulfate and nitrate.</p>
      <p id="d1e1985">In the Riemer09 parameterization, unreactive organic layers are further
considered for the suppression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis by covering the
aqueous core. Organic layers may be formed by secondary organic aerosols,
and such layers may consist of a single layer of molecules (monolayered
coatings) or of several molecule layers (multilayered coatings) on the
surface of the aqueous core. These organic layers are assumed to be an organic
“coating” (shell) in the Riemer09 parameterization. The resistor scheme to
calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Riemer09 parameterization is
parameterized as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M96" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reaction probability of the aqueous
core, which is calculated using Eq. (4), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
pseudo-reaction probability of the organic coating calculated by the
following formulation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M99" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coat</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the universal gas constant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
Henry's law constant for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the organic coating, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diffusion coefficient for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the organic
coating. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depend on the physicochemical properties of
the compounds comprising the organic coating. In the Riemer09 scheme,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Henry's law constant of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
aqueous phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diffusion
coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the aqueous phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the radius of the
particle, radius of the inorganic core, and thickness of the coating,
respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are calculated as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M125" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>9</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>10</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the volume of inorganic and organic materials, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Statistical methods for model evaluation</title>
      <?pagebreak page8193?><p id="d1e2687">In this study, the mean bias (MB), root-mean-square error (RMSE), the index
of agreement (IOA), mean fractional bias (MFB), and mean fractional error
(MFE) are used to evaluate the model performance in simulating air
pollutants.

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M128" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>11</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MB</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E12"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>12</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RMSE</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E13"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>13</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E14"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>14</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MFB</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E15"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>15</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MFE</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the simulated and observed variables,
respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of the simulations for comparisons, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> donates the average of the observation. The IOA ranges from 0 to
1, with 1 showing a perfect agreement of the simulation with the
observation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Air pollutant observations</title>
      <p id="d1e3063">Simulations are compared to available meteorological and air pollutant
observations to evaluate the model performance. The meteorological
parameters including temperature, RH, wind speed, and direction are obtained
from the website <uri>http://www.meteomanz.com</uri> (last access: 20 June 2019). The hourly
observations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO
concentrations are released by the China National Environmental Monitoring
Center and can be downloaded from the website <uri>http://106.37.208.233:20035</uri> (last access: 20 June 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e3115">Additionally, hourly organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) concentrations are measured using a
thermal–optical reflectance carbon analyzer (OCEC RT-4, Sunset Lab, USA) at
the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CRAES, 40.04<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116.40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in Beijing (Wei et al., 2014; Liu et al.,
2018). Hourly sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and other inorganic
ions are sampled and analyzed by ion chromatography (URG 9000S, Thermo
Fisher Scientific, USA).</p>
      <p id="d1e3136">The OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratio approach is used to derive the SOA mass concentrations from
EC and OC filter measurements as follows (Strader, 1999; Cao et al., 2004):

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M140" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E16"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>16</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E17"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>17</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E18"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>18</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where POC and SOC are the primary OC and secondary OC, respectively. In the
present study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are assumed to be 2.4
and 1.6, respectively, based on previous studies (Cao et al., 2007;
Aiken et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2009), and detailed information about the
approach can be found in Feng et al. (2016). It is worth noting that those
assumed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could potentially affect the
model–measurement comparisons.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Synoptic conditions during the wintertime of 2014</title>
      <p id="d1e3285">Based on the NCEP FNL reanalysis data
(<uri>https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds083.2</uri>, last access: 20 June 2019), we have initially performed the
analysis of synoptic conditions using the wind, temperature, relative
humidity, and geopotential height fields at 500 and 850 hPa averaged from
10 to 27 February 2014 over China (Fig. 2). At 500 hPa, flat
westerly winds prevail over BTH and its surrounding area, indicating
stagnant atmospheric circulation conditions (Fig. 2a). Moreover, the flat
isotherm distribution is similar to that of the isobar at 500 hPa, showing
that there is no obvious exchange of cold and warm air masses, which
together with the flat westerly leads to weak turbulent mixing in the
vertical direction and stable weather conditions (Fig. 2b). At 850 hPa,
the southeast coastal areas of China are controlled by the anticyclone,
whose center is located over the South China Sea (Fig. 2c). In eastern
China influenced by the anticyclone, the weak southerly wind prevails over
the BTH and its surrounding regions, providing a favorable condition for
stagnant weather conditions and the formation of air pollution. With
the prevailing southerly wind, the warm and humid air flow and the polluted
air mass are subject to being transported from south to north, aggravating
the air pollution in BTH. In addition, high-relative-humidity conditions
facilitate heterogeneous reactions for secondary aerosol formation
(Fig. 2d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3293">Distributions of average winds (black flag vectors), geopotential
heights (blue lines), temperature (red lines), and relative humidity
(contour fill) at <bold>(a, b)</bold> 500 hPa and <bold>(c, d)</bold> 850 hPa from 10 to 27 February 2014, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/8189/2019/acp-19-8189-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Model performance</title>
      <p id="d1e3316">In order to quantify effects of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis
and organic coating on the nitrate formation, three experiments have been
performed in the study. In the base case, the Riemer09 parameterization is used
to take into consideration the organic coating effect on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
heterogeneous hydrolysis by assuming that all the SOA is involved in coating
(hereafter referred to as the B-case). In the first sensitivity case, the
contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis to nitrate
formation is not considered (hereafter referred to as the H0-case). In the
second sensitivity case, the organic coating effect is not considered in the
Riemer09 parameterization (hereafter referred to as the C0-case). The simulation
results in the B-case are compared to observations in BTH.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Meteorological parameter simulations in Beijing</title>
      <p id="d1e3374">Considering that the meteorological conditions play a crucial role in air
pollution simulations, which determine accumulation or dispersion of
pollutants, verifications are first performed for the simulations of
meteorological fields. Figure 3 presents the temporal profile of the
simulated and observed temperature, RH, wind speed, and wind direction
averaged over 12 meteorological sites in Beijing from 10 to 27 February
2014. The WRF-Chem model reproduces the temporal variation in the
surface temperature during the whole episode well. The MB and RMSE are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C, and the<?pagebreak page8194?> IOA reaches 0.94, indicating good agreement of the
simulations with observations (Table 2). The simulated temporal RH
variations are also consistent with observations, with a MB, RMSE, and
IOA of 2.6 %, 10.9 %, and 0.89, respectively. In addition, the model
tracks the temporal variations in the surface wind reasonably well, with
IOAs of 0.73 and 0.66 for the wind speed and direction, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3398">Temporal variations in simulated (red line) and observed (black
dots) meteorological parameters of near-surface <bold>(a)</bold> temperature, <bold>(b)</bold> relative humidity, <bold>(c)</bold> wind speed, and <bold>(d)</bold> wind direction averaged at 12
meteorological sites in Beijing from 10 to 27 February 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/8189/2019/acp-19-8189-2019-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3422">Statistics for model performance.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MFB (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MFE (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RMSE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IOA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.94</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Relative humidity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Wind speed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">38.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.0 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Wind direction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">54.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">90.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.66</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.96</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.85</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>CO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>SOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.83</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sulfate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.88</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ammonium</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">44.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Nitrate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.96</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3425">a, b, and c represent the meteorological parameter averaged over 12 meteorological sites in Beijing, the air pollutant averaged over all ambient
monitoring stations in BTH, and the aerosol component at the CRAES site in
Beijing, respectively.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Air pollutant simulations in BTH</title>
      <p id="d1e4341">Figure 4 shows the relationship between observed and simulated mass
concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO in
Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei from 10 to 27 February 2014. The correlation
coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations between observations and
simulations in Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei is 0.83, 0.80, and 0.90,
respectively, indicating a good performance of the WRF-Chem model in
simulating the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in BTH. The correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations between observations and simulations is not
as good as that of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in BTH, with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0.6
and 0.8. Apparently, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations with observations shows
that the WRF-Chem model still has difficulties in simulating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in BTH well, particularly in Hebei. Except uncertainties from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, such as source intensities and<?pagebreak page8195?> distributions and diurnal
profiles, the bias of simulated wind fields also substantially
influences the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulation (Bei et al., 2017). In particular,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is principally emitted by the point source, including the power
plants and agglomerated industrial zones, so the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations are
more sensitive to the wind field simulation uncertainties. In terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations in Beijing and Tianjin are better than those in
Hebei, indicating that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in Beijing and Tianjin are
generally determined by area sources, i.e., the residential living, but the
point source dominates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in Hebei. Considering the
long lifetime of CO in the atmosphere, the CO simulation is decided by its
emission and the meteorological fields. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of CO simulations with
observations in BTH ranges from around 0.6 to 0.7, showing that the CO
emissions used in the study and simulated meteorological fields are
generally reasonable.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4574">Relationships between observed and simulated mass concentrations of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO in Beijing, Tianjin, and
Hebei from 10 to 27 February 2014. The red line is the linear regression
between observations and simulations, and the black dashed line presents the
1 : 1 line.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/8189/2019/acp-19-8189-2019-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4627">Comparison of observed (black dots) and simulated (red line)
diurnal profiles of near-surface hourly <bold>(a)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(e)</bold> CO averaged over all ambient monitoring
stations in BTH from 10 to 27 February 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/8189/2019/acp-19-8189-2019-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page8196?><p id="d1e4695">Figure 5 presents the diurnal profiles of simulated and observed PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO mass concentrations averaged over all
ambient monitoring stations in BTH during the simulated episode. The
WRF-Chem model reproduces the diurnal variations in the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
concentrations against observations in BTH well. The MB and RMSE are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.3 and
27.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and the IOA is 0.96. The model generally replicates the haze-developing stage well, but fails to capture the observed
spikes of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations, which might be caused by the
uncertainty of the simulated meteorological fields or irregular air
pollutant emissions (Bei et al., 2017). The simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diurnal
variations are in good agreement with observations, with a MB and IOA of
1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.91, respectively. The model tracks the
observed diurnal variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations with an IOA of
0.92 well, but it slightly overestimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations compared to
observations with a MB of 6.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, during nighttime,
the model overestimation is considerable, which is perhaps due to the model
biases in modeling nighttime planetary boundary layer (PBL). Although the model reasonably yields the
variation trend of the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, with an IOA of 0.85,
the dispersion of the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is rather large, with
a RMSE of 27.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, the model overestimates the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration compared to observations, and the MB is 7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which might be mainly caused by the emission inventory that has
undergone noticeable changes since implementation of emission control
strategies in 2013 in BTH. The model performs well in simulating CO diurnal
variations against observations, with a MB and IOA of 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 0.90, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e4957">Spatial distributions of average <bold>(a)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations from 10 to 27 February
2014. Colored dots, colored contour, and black arrows are observations,
simulations, and simulated surface winds, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/8189/2019/acp-19-8189-2019-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5021">Figure 6 presents the distributions of simulated and observed near-surface
mass concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along
with the predicted wind fields averaged during the episode. Generally, the
simulated wind in BTH is weak during the episode and the southerly wind
prevails, corresponding to the synoptic situation at 850 and 500 hPa well,
which is favorable for the accumulation of air pollutants. The observed
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are more than 115 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average,
showing that BTH suffers from heavy haze pollution (Fig. 6a). The model
generally reproduces the spatial distribution of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations against observations well, with the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
exceeding 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the plain area of BTH. The simulated and
observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations are less than 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the plain area of BTH, and in several megacities, including Beijing,
Tianjin, Baoding, and Shijiazhuang, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are less than
30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6b). The low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during the
episode are generally caused by the weak insolation during wintertime, which
is unfavorable for photochemical reactions, and the titration due to high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in BTH (Fig. 6c). The simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
are generally more than 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with the
observations at monitoring sites in BTH. The simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mass concentrations in cities or their surrounding areas are still rather
high, exceeding 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6d). Elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in BTH during wintertime are to some degree contributed by
the residential coal combustion (Li et al., 2018). High levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show that stringent emission mitigation strategies still need
to be implemented in BTH.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Sulfate, ammonium, and SOA simulations in Beijing</title>
      <p id="d1e5324">The SOA and sulfate concentration directly influences the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
heterogeneous hydrolysis in the Riemer09 parameterization, and the ammonium
aerosol concentration substantially affects the nitrate aerosol formation.
Therefore, Fig. 7 presents the temporal profiles of observed and
calculated SOA, sulfate, and ammonium mass concentrations at the CRAES site in
Beijing from 10 to 27 February 2014. The model reasonably tracks the diurnal
variation in the SOA concentration compared to observations, with a MB and
IOA of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.83, respectively. The observed SOA
concentration exhibits rather large fluctuations, which are not
reproduced well by the model. The simulated sulfate trend<?pagebreak page8197?> is generally in
agreement with observations with an IOA of 0.88, but there are considerable
model biases. During the first pollution event, the model reasonably
reproduces the sulfate increase during the haze-developing stage, but the
early falloff of sulfate concentrations during the dissipation stage causes
a substantial underestimation. However, during the second pollution event,
the model considerably overestimates the sulfate concentration against the
measurement from 22 to 26 February 2014. The ammonium simulation is slightly
better than that of sulfate, with an IOA of 0.90.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e5375">Comparison of observed (black dots) and simulated (red line)
diurnal profiles of hourly <bold>(a)</bold> SOA, <bold>(b)</bold> sulfate, and <bold>(c)</bold> ammonium
concentrations at the CRAES site in Beijing from 10 to 27 February 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/8189/2019/acp-19-8189-2019-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5393">Furthermore, the MFB and MFE between simulations and observations are also
calculated to evaluate the model performance in simulating meteorological
parameters and air pollutants (Table 2). Boylan and Russell (2006)
proposed that MFB should be within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and MFE should be below
75 % for a satisfactory model performance. For the simulation in the
B-case, MFB values are within 27 % and MFE values are below 55 %,
indicating that the model performance is satisfactory.</p>
      <p id="d1e5407">In summary, the WRF-Chem model performs reasonably well in simulating air
pollutants and aerosol species, showing that the simulated meteorological
fields and emissions used in the study are generally reasonable.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page8198?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Contributions of the {$\protect\chem{N_{{2}}O_{{5}}}$} heterogeneous hydrolysis
and organic coating to the nitrate formation}?><title>Contributions of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis
and organic coating to the nitrate formation</title>
      <?pagebreak page8199?><p id="d1e5436">Figure 8 provides the nitrate temporal variations in the three cases against
observations at CRAES site in Beijing from 10 to 27 February 2014. When the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis is not considered in the H0-case,
although the model tracks the observed nitrate variations well with an IOA
of 0.91, it considerably underestimates nitrate concentration against the
measurement, with a MB of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. When the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
heterogeneous hydrolysis is taken into consideration based on the Riemer09
parameterization without organic coating in the C0-case, the nitrate
simulation is improved compared to that in the H0-case, with an IOA of 0.95.
However, the model begins to overestimate the nitrate concentration
compared to the measurement, with a MB of 5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the
B-case, when all the SOA is assumed to be involved in coating to suppress
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous uptake on surfaces of deliquescent
aerosols, the model performs best in simulating the nitrate variation
compared to the measurement, with a MB and IOA of 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
0.96, respectively. The remarkable consistency of the simulated nitrate in
the B-case with the measurement indicates that the organic coating plays an
important role in improving the nitrate simulation. It is worth noting that
the MB for nitrate aerosols at the CRAES site in the B-case is close to zero,
but the RMSE is still rather large, reaching 19.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
showing considerable underestimation and overestimation, caused by
uncertainties of meteorological fields and emissions. For example, the model
overestimates nitrate concentrations on 11, 13, and 14 February and
underestimates on 24 February against measurements. In addition, the early
occurrence of intensified winds in the morning on 16 February in simulations
causes rapid falloff of nitrate concentrations, leading to substantial model
biases.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e5581">Temporal variations in observed (black dot) and simulated
(green line: H0-case; blue line: C0-case; red line: B-case) nitrate
concentrations at the CRAES site in Beijing from 10 to 27 February 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/8189/2019/acp-19-8189-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e5593">Spatial distributions of average nitrate contributions of <bold>(a)</bold> the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis and <bold>(b)</bold> organic coating in BTH from
10 to 27 February 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/8189/2019/acp-19-8189-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page8201?><p id="d1e5624">Figure 9a presents the distribution of contributions of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
heterogeneous hydrolysis to the nitrate formation averaged during the
episode by differentiating simulations in the B-case and H0-case. The
contribution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis to the nitrate
formation is substantial in BTH, exceeding 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the plain
area. Although the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is fairly low in BTH during the
episode (Fig. 6b), particularly during nighttime (Fig. 5b), the elevated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level still facilitates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation to warrant
occurrence of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis. Previous studies
have revealed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis is vital in
nitrate formation. For example, Wang et al. (2017) calculated the daily
average nitrate formation potential from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous
hydrolysis in Beijing, showing that the reaction accounts for 52 % of the
total nitrate formation. Su et al. (2017) investigated the contribution
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis to the nitrate formation in
Beijing during autumn in 2015 and found that the reaction causes a 21.0 %
enhancement of nitrate concentrations. In the present study, the nitrate
contribution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis is 29.4 % in
Beijing during the episode on average, which is close to the result in Su et
al. (2017) but much lower than that in Wang et al. (2017). The average
nitrate contribution of the reaction in BTH is about 30.1 %, showing that
the reaction constitutes an important nitrate source during the haze
pollution episode. Additionally, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis
contributes 11.6 % of the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration on average, playing a
considerable role in the haze formation in BTH.</p>
      <p id="d1e5824">However, it is worth noting that the brute force method (BFM) is used to
quantify the contribution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis to
the nitrate formation (Dunker et al., 1996). The BFM is generally used to
assess the importance of some source, but it lacks consideration of
interactions of the complicated physical and chemical processes in the
atmosphere (Zhang and Ying, 2011). Therefore, in the study, the contribution
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis to the nitrate formation
might be underestimated, considering the competition of inorganic cations
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formed through gas-phase reactions and sulfate aerosols in
the atmosphere. It is imperative to use the source-oriented base module to
evaluate the nitrate contribution of the reaction.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e5872">Temporal variation in the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
B-case in Beijing from 10 to 27 February 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/8189/2019/acp-19-8189-2019-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5901">Figure 9b shows the distribution of the average decrease in nitrate
concentrations due to suppression of organic coating during the episode by
differentiating simulations in the B-case and C0-case. The organic coating
reduces the nitrate concentration by more than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
plain area of BTH, and on average the decrease in nitrate aerosols is 4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or 8.4 % in BTH during the episode. Riemer et al. (2009) have shown that when the nitrate levels are high (above 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), the organic coating decreases nitrate concentrations by 10 %–15 %
over Europe. However, Chen et al. (2018) have demonstrated that the
suppression of organic coating is negligible over western and central
Europe, with an influence on nitrate concentrations of less than 2 % on
average and 20 % at the most significant moment. Apparently, except for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and water-soluble OA in the atmosphere, the effect of organic
coating is also dependent on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RH, and temperature. Hence, the
inconsistency between the model results about the organic coating effect can
be attributed to the variation in simulation conditions. For example, in
order to obtain substantial effects of the organic coating, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
SOA, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> need to be present when RH is high and temperature is low.
However, those conditions are rarely fulfilled simultaneously over western
and central Europe, causing a negligible effect of organic coating (Chen et
al., 2018). Additionally, Wang et al. (2017) have indicated that the
evaluated nitrate level with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis in
Beijing is much higher than the observation, which they have attributed to
atmospheric dilution and deposition. It is worth noting that the organic
coating effect might constitute one of the most possible reasons for the
overestimation of nitrate concentrations, considering the elevated SOA level
in Beijing, which suppresses the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis and
results in high observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Wu et al., 2017).
Figure 10 presents the temporal variation in the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing during the
episode. The simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluctuates between 0.009
and 0.02 when organic coating is included, with an average of 0.013. The
estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing by Wang et
al. (2017) ranges from 0.025 to 0.072 without consideration of the
suppression of organic coating, indicating that organic coating
substantially hinders the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis, likely
causing the observed high level of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during nighttime.</p>
      <p id="d1e6162">It is worth noting that, in the study, the assumption of metastable aerosols
is used or the water-soluble aerosol is assumed to be only in a liquid state
in simulations. However, Wang et al. (2008) have highlighted the effect of
the hysteresis of particle-phase transitions on the distribution of<?pagebreak page8202?> solid
and aqueous aerosols. The aerosol phase is generally regulated by the
hysteresis loop. Atmospheric particles containing inorganic salts remain
solid until the RH reaches the DRH (deliquescence relative humidity). At the
DRH, the solid particle spontaneously absorbs water to become a saturated
aqueous solution. However, the liquid particle does not crystallize when the
RH is below the DRH (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006). Therefore, another possible
pathway exists to suppress the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis; i.e., the
inorganic particles might be in solid phase without organic coating. Further
studies need to be conducted to evaluate the hysteresis effect on the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis and organic coating.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Studies of organic aerosol hygroscopicity sensitivity to
nitrate formation</title>
      <p id="d1e6205">In Sect. 3.3, the WRF-Chem model considerably improves nitrate simulations
when considering the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis and organic
coating effects. Organic aerosols (OAs) are broadly classified as primary OA
(POA) directly emitted and SOA formed in the atmosphere, some of which are
water soluble. In order to explore the effects of different OA coatings on
the nitrate formation, an additional four sensitivity studies are conducted, in
which half of SOA (C1-case), all SOA (C2-case), all SOA and half of POA
(C3-case), and all SOA and POA (C4-case) are involved in coating.</p>
      <p id="d1e6224">Figure 11 shows the Taylor diagram (Taylor, 2001) to present the variance,
bias, and correlation of the observed and simulated nitrate concentrations in
the four sensitivity cases at the CRAES site during the episode. In the C1-case,
when half of SOA is considered to be involved in coating, the simulated nitrate
concentration is the most consistent with the observation, with a
correlation coefficient of 0.96. In the C2-case with all SOA assumed to be
engaged in coating, the correlation coefficient decreases to 0.95. The
normalized standardized deviation (NSD) is 1.02 for the C1-case and C2-case,
showing the model overestimation in these two cases. With half of POA
involved in coating, the NSD is very close to 1.0 (0.99), indicating the
simulated nitrate concentration in the C3-case is almost the same as the
observation on average, but the correlation coefficient of 0.94 is less than
those in the C1-case and C2-case. When all of OA is assumed as the coating,
the bias between simulated and observed nitrate concentrations is the
largest, and the effect of POA on suppressing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
heterogeneous hydrolysis might be overestimated in the C4-case.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e6245">Taylor diagram (Taylor, 2001) to present the variance, bias, and
correlation of the observed and simulated nitrate concentrations at the CRAES
site in Beijing from 10 to 27 February 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/8189/2019/acp-19-8189-2019-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page8203?><p id="d1e6255"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Sensitivity results show that the effects of different organic compounds on
suppressing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis to form nitrate
vary, depending on the content of water-soluble OA. Laboratory and field
measurements have revealed that OA becomes progressively oxidized and more
hygroscopic during the aging process in the atmosphere (Jimenez et al.,
2009). The OA hygroscopicity constitutes a necessary prerequisite for
accurately representing the organic coating effect on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
heterogeneous hydrolysis. According to the simulations in the present study,
in BTH, not all SOA can serve as the coating to suppress the nitrate
formation, and the effect of POA on coating might be neglected. Xing et al. (2019) have shown that in BTH, the heterogeneous SOA formed by irreversible
uptake of glyoxal and methylglyoxal on wet aerosol surfaces contributes
about 30 % of the SOA mass during haze days. Considering the possible
heterogeneous SOA contribution of other carbonyl compounds and the
atmospheric aging of OA, about half of SOA should likely be hygroscopic and
involved in coating.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e6301">Nitrate aerosol has constituted a main component of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with
implementation of aggressive emission control strategies since 2013 in BTH.
In the study, the Riemer09 parameterization is implemented into the WRF-Chem
model to simulate the nitrate formation from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
heterogeneous hydrolysis referred to as the most important pathway of the
nitrate formation at nighttime. A heavy haze episode from 10 to 27 February
2014 in BTH is simulated using the WRF-Chem model to verify the effect of
organic coating on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis and its
consequent contribution to nitrate formation. Analyses of synoptic
fields show a stagnant weather condition with the prevailing southerly wind
in the low-level atmosphere in BTH and surrounding areas during the episode,
facilitating accumulation of air pollutants and heavy haze formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e6345">The WRF-Chem model performs reasonably in predicting the temporal variations
in the meteorological parameters compared to observations in Beijing. The
model generally reproduces the temporal variations in and spatial
distributions of air pollutants well against observations at monitoring sites in
BTH. In addition, the simulated diurnal profiles of sulfate, ammonium, and
SOA are also in good agreement with the measurements at the CRAES site in
Beijing.</p>
      <p id="d1e6348">The Riemer09 parameterization with all the SOA assumed to be involved in
coating considerably improves the nitrate simulations compared to the
measurements at the CRAES site in Beijing. When organic coating is not
considered in the Riemer09 parameterization, the model overestimates the
nitrate concentration against the measurements. On average, organic coating
decreases nitrate concentrations by 4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or 8.4 % in BTH
during the episode. Furthermore, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis
with organic coating contributes about 30.1 % of nitrate concentrations
and 11.6 % of the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in BTH, playing a considerable
role in the haze formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e6396">Sensitivity studies reveal that the OA hygroscopicity is a necessary
prerequisite for accurately evaluating the organic coating effect on the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis. In the present study, POA might not
serve as coating and about half of SOA should be involved in coating to
suppress the nitrate formation. Future studies still need to be conducted to
further predict the OA hygroscopicity, in order to more precisely represent
the organic coating effect on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous hydrolysis in
chemical transport models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6435">The real-time PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO are accessible for the public on the website <uri>http://106.37.208.233:20035</uri> (China MEP, 2013a). One can also access the historic profile of observed ambient pollutants through visiting <uri>http://www.aqistudy.cn</uri> (China MEP, 2013b).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6490">GL, as the contact author, provided the ideas and financial support,
verified the conclusions, and revised the paper. LL conducted
research, designed the experiments, carried the methodology out, performed
the simulation, processed the data, prepared the data visualization, and
prepared the paper with contributions from all authors. JW and
XL provided the treatment of meteorological data, analyzed the study
data, validated the model performance, and reviewed the paper. SL, YQ, TF, and JZ provided the observation data
used in the study, synthesized the observation, and reviewed the paper.
XT and JC provided critical reviews in the pre-publication stage.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6496">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6502">This article is part of the special issue “Regional transport and transformation of air pollution in eastern China”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6508">This work is financially supported by the National Key R&amp;D Plan
(Quantitative Relationship and Regulation Principle between Regional
Oxidation Capacity of Atmospheric and Air Quality (2017YFC0210000)) and
National Research Program for Key Issues in Air Pollution Control (DQGG0105).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6513">This research has been supported by the National Key R&amp;D Plan (grant no. 2017YFC0210000) and the National Research Program for Key Issues in Air Pollution Control (grant no. DQGG0105).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <?pagebreak page8204?><p id="d1e6519">This paper was edited by Luisa Molina and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J.
A., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D.,
Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna,
M. R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Prévôt, A. S. H., Dommen, J.,
Duplissy, J., Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and Jimenez, J. L.: O / C and
OM / OC Ratios of Primary, Secondary, and Ambient Organic Aerosols with
High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci.
Techn., 42, 4478–4485, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es703009q</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Anttila, T., Kiendlerscharr, A., Tillmann, R., and Mentel, T. F.: On the
reactive uptake of gaseous compounds by organic-coated aqueous aerosols:
theoretical analysis and application to the heterogeneous hydrolysis of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 10435–10443,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp062403c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp062403c</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bei, N., Wu, J., Elser, M., Feng, T., Cao, J., El-Haddad, I., Li, X., Huang, R., Li, Z., Long, X., Xing, L., Zhao, S., Tie, X., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Li, G.: Impacts of meteorological uncertainties on the haze formation in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) during wintertime: a case study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14579–14591, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14579-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-14579-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bertram, T. H. and Thornton, J. A.: Toward a general parameterization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactivity on aqueous particles: the competing effects of particle liquid water, nitrate and chloride, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8351–8363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8351-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8351-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Binkowski, F. S. and Roselle, S. J.: Models-3 Community Multiscale Air
Quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component 1. Model description, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 108, 335–346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001409" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001409</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Boylan, J. W. and Russell, A. G.: PM and light extinction model performance
metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models,
Atmos. Environ., 40, 4946–4959,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Brown, S. S., Ryerson, T. B., Wollny, A. G., Brock, C. A., Peltier, R.,
Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., Dubé, W. P., Trainer, M., and Meagher, J.
F.: Variability in Nocturnal Nitrogen Oxide Processing and Its Role in
Regional Air Quality, Science, 311, 67–70, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1120120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1120120</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Brown, S. S., Dubé, W. P., Tham, Y. J., Zha, Q., Xue, L., Poon, S.,
Wang, Z., Blake, D. R., Tsui, W., Parrish, D. D., and Wang, T.: Nighttime
chemistry at a high altitude site above Hong Kong, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
121, 2457–2475, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024566" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024566</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Ho, K. F., Zou, S. C., Fung, K., Li, Y., Watson, J.
G., and Chow, J. C.: Spatial and seasonal variations of atmospheric organic
carbon and elemental carbon in Pearl River Delta Region, China, Atmos.
Environ., 38, 4447–4456, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.016</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Ho, K. F., Zhang, R. J.,
Jin, Z. D., Shen, Z. X., Chen, G. C., Kang, Y. M., Zou, S. C., Zhang, L. Z.,
Qi, S. H., Dai, M. H., Cheng, Y., and Hu, K.: Spatial and seasonal
distributions of carbonaceous aerosols over China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
112, D22S11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008205</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Chang, W. L., Bhave, P. V., Brown, S. S., Riemer, N., Stutz, J., and Dabdub,
D.: Heterogeneous Atmospheric Chemistry, Ambient Measurements, and Model
Calculations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: A Review, Aerosol Sci.  Technol., 45,
665–695, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.551672" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.551672</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model
with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation
and sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129&lt;0569:CAALSH&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129&lt;0569:CAALSH&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Wolke, R., Ran, L., Birmili, W., Spindler, G., Schröder, W., Su, H., Cheng, Y., Tegen, I., and Wiedensohler, A.: A parameterization of the heterogeneous hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for mass-based aerosol models: improvement of particulate nitrate prediction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 673–689, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-673-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-673-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Ministry of Environmental Protection, China (China MEP): Air Quality Observation Real-time Release Platform of MEP Data Center, available at: <uri>http://106.37.208.233:20035</uri> (last access: 20 June 2019), 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Ministry of Environmental Protection, China (China MEP): Online Monitoring and Analysis Platform of China Air Quality, available at: <uri>http://www.aqistudy.cn</uri> (last access: 20 June 2019), 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chou, M. D. and Suarez, M. J.: A solar radiation parameterization for
atmospheric studies, edited by: Suarez, M. J., No. NASA/TM-1999-10460, NASA Technique Report, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Chou, M. D., Suarez, M. J., Liang, X. Z., Yan, M. H., and Cote, C.: A
Thermal Infrared Radiation Parameterization for Atmospheric Studies, edited by: Suarez, M. J., No. NASA/TM-2001-104606, NASA Technique Report, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Davis, J. M., Bhave, P. V., and Foley, K. M.: Parameterization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction probabilities on the surface of particles containing ammonium, sulfate, and nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5295–5311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5295-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-5295-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Dentener, F. J. and Crutzen, P. J.: Reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on
tropospheric aerosols: Impact on the global distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OH, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 7149–7163,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92JD02979</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Dunker, A. M., Morris, R. E., Pollack, A. K., Schleyer, C. H., and Yarwood,
G: Photochemical modeling of the impact of fuels and vehicles on urban ozone
using auto oil program data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 787–801,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es950175m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es950175m</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Evans, M. J. and Jacob, D. J.: Impact of new laboratory studies of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis on global model budgets of tropospheric nitrogen
oxides, ozone, and OH, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 297–314,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022469" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL022469</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Feng, T., Li, G., Cao, J., Bei, N., Shen, Z., Zhou, W., Liu, S., Zhang, T., Wang, Y., Huang, R.-J., Tie, X., and Molina, L. T.: Simulations of organic aerosol concentrations during springtime in the Guanzhong Basin, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10045–10061, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10045-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10045-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page8205?><ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Gao, M., Carmichael, G. R., Wang, Y., Saide, P. E., Yu, M., Xin, J., Liu, Z., and Wang, Z.: Modeling study of the 2010 regional haze event in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1673–1691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1673-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1673-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G.,
Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled “online” chemistry within
the WRF model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron, C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3181–3210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J., Shang, D., Zheng, J., Du, Z., Wu,
Z., Shao, M., and Zeng, L.: Elucidating severe urban haze formation in
China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 17373–17378,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1419604111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hess, P. G., Flocke, S., Lamarque, J. F., Barth, M. C., and Madronich, S.:
Episodic modeling of the chemical structure of the troposphere as revealed
during the spring MLOPEX 2 intensive, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105,
809–839, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hong, S. Y. and Lim, J. O. J.: The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics
Scheme (WSM6), Asia-Pacif. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 129–151, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Horowitz, L. W., Walters, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Emmons, L. K., Rasch, P. J.,
Granier, C., Tie, X., Lamarque, J. F., Schultz, M. G., Tyndall, G. S.,
Orlando, J. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: A global simulation of tropospheric
ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4784, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002853" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002853</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Janjić, Z. I.: Nonsingular Implementation of the Mellor-Yamada Level 2.5
Scheme in the NCEP Meso Model, NCEP Office Note 437, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P.
I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrnann, S., Weimer,
S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A.,
Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, M. Y., Dzepina,
K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A.
M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E.,
Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the
atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kim, Y. J., Spak, S. N., Carmichael, G. R., Riemer, N., and Stanier, C. O.:
Modeled aerosol nitrate formation pathways during wintertime in the Great
Lakes region of North America, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 12420–12445,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022320" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022320</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Zhang, R., Fan, J., and Tie, X.: Impacts of black carbon aerosol on
photolysis and ozone, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D23206,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005898" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD005898</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Lei, W., Zavala, M., Volkamer, R., Dusanter, S., Stevens, P., and Molina, L. T.: Impacts of HONO sources on the photochemistry in Mexico City during the MCMA-2006/MILAGO Campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6551–6567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6551-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6551-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Bei, N., Tie, X., and Molina, L. T.: Aerosol effects on the photochemistry in Mexico City during MCMA-2006/MILAGRO campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5169–5182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5169-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5169-2011</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Zavala, M., Lei, W., Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Pandis, S. N., Canagaratna, M. R., and Molina, L. T.: Simulations of organic aerosol concentrations in Mexico City using the WRF-CHEM model during the MCMA-2006/MILAGRO campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3789–3809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3789-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3789-2011</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Lei, W., Bei, N., and Molina, L. T.: Contribution of garbage burning to chloride and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Mexico City, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8751–8761, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8751-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8751-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Bei, N., Cao, J., Huang, R., Wu, J., Feng, T., Wang, Y., Liu, S., Zhang, Q., Tie, X., and Molina, L. T.: A possible pathway for rapid growth of sulfate during haze days in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3301–3316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3301-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-3301-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Li, X., Wu, J., Elser, M., Feng, T., Cao, J., El-Haddad, I., Huang, R., Tie, X., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Li, G.: Contributions of residential coal combustion to the air quality in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH), China: a case study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10675–10691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10675-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-10675-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Liggio, J., Li, S. M., and McLaren, R.: Reactive uptake of glyoxal by
particulate matter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D10304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd005113</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Liu, W., Shen, G., Chen, Y., Shen, H., Huang, Y., Li, T., Wang, Y., Fu, X.,
Tao, S., Liu, W., Huang-Fu, Y., Zhang, W., Xue, C., Liu, G., Wu, F., and
Wong, M.: Air pollution and inhalation exposure to particulate matter of
different sizes in rural households using improved stoves in central China,
J. Environ. Sci.-China, 63, 87–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.06.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2017.06.019</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Lowe, D., Archer-Nicholls, S., Morgan, W., Allan, J., Utembe, S., Ouyang, B., Aruffo, E., Le Breton, M., Zaveri, R. A., Di Carlo, P., Percival, C., Coe, H., Jones, R., and McFiggans, G.: WRF-Chem model predictions of the regional impacts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous processes on night-time chemistry over north-western Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1385–1409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1385-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1385-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009604003981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1009604003981</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Riemer, N., Vogel, H., Vogel, B., Schell, B., Ackermann, I., Kessler, C.,
and Hass, H.: Impact of the heterogeneous hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on
chemistry and nitrate aerosol formation in the lower troposphere under
photosmog conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., D4, 4144,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002436" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002436</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Riemer, N., Vogel, H., Vogel, B., Anttila, T., Kiendler-Scharr, A., and
Mentel, T.F.: Relative importance of organic coatings for the heterogeneous
hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during<?pagebreak page8206?> summer in Europe, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 114, D17307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011369" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011369</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K.,Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pandis, S. N., and Pierce, J. R.:
Rethinking organic aerosols: semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, 2nd Edn., John Wiley &amp; Sons Inc., New
York, USA, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M. K., Lane, T. E., Donahue, N. M., Pandis, S. N., and
Robinson, A. L.: Effects of gas particle partitioning and aging of primary
emissions on urban and regional organic aerosol concentrations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D18301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009735</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Strader, R.: Evaluation of secondary organic aerosol formation in winter,
Atmos. Environ., 33, 4849–4863, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00310-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00310-6</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Su, X., Tie, X., Li, G., Cao, J., Huang, R., Feng, T., Long, X., and Xu, R.: Effect of hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on nitrate and ammonium formation in Beijing China: WRF-Chem model simulation, Sci. Total Environ., 579, 221–229, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J., and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Du, W., Zhang, Q., Wang, Q. Q., Fu, P. Q., Pan, X. L., Li, J., Jayne, J., and Worsnop, D. R.: Long-term real-time measurements of aerosol particle composition in Beijing, China: seasonal variations, meteorological effects, and source analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10149–10165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Zhang, L., Cao, J., and Zhang, R.: A review of current knowledge concerning PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical composition, aerosol optical properties and their relationships across China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9485–9518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9485-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-9485-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, K. E.: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single
diagram, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 7183–7192,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900719</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Tie, X., Madronich, S., Walters, S., Zhang, R., Rasch, P., and Collins, W.:
Effect of clouds on photolysis and oxidants in the troposphere, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 108, 4642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003659" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003659</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Martini, F. S., Molina, L. T., Salcedo, D., Jimenez, J. L.,
and Molina, M. J.: A missing sink for gas-phase glyoxal in Mexico City:
Formation of secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030752" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl030752</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M. E., Yang, L., Levy Zamora, M., Hu, M., Lin,
Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., Meng, J., Li, J., Cheng, C., Hu, T., Ren, Y., Wang,
Y., Gao, J., Cao, J., An, Z., Zhou, W., Li, G., Wang, J., Tian, P.,
Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zeng, L.,
Shao, M., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B.,
Cai, L., Cheng, Y., Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Rosenfeld, D., Liss, P. S., Duce, R.
A., Kolb, C. E., and Molina, M. J.: Persistent sulfate formation from London
Fog to Chinese haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13630–13635,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1616540113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Lu, K., Chen, X., Zhu, Q., Chen, Q., Guo, S., Jiang, M., Li, X.,
Shang, D., Tan, Z., Wu, Y., Wu, Z., Zou, Q., Zheng, Y., Zeng, L., Zhu, T.,
Hu, M., and Zhang, Y.: High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations observed in urban
Beijing: Implications of a large nitrate formation Pathway, Environ. Sci.
Tech. Lett., 4, 416–420, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00341" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00341</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Hoffmann, A. A., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., and Martin, S. T.:
Global distribution of solid and aqueous sulfate aerosols: Effect of the
hysteresis of particle phase transitions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113,
D11206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009367" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009367</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Wei, S., Shen, G., Zhang, Y., Xue, M., Xie, H., Lin, P., Chen, Y., Wang, X.
and Tao, S.: Field measurement on the emissions of PM, OC, EC and PAHs from
indoor crop straw burning in rural China, Environ. Pollut., 184, 18–24,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.036</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Wesely, M. L.: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry
deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23,
1293–1304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Wu, J., Li, G., Cao, J., Bei, N., Wang, Y., Feng, T., Huang, R., Liu, S., Zhang, Q., and Tie, X.: Contributions of trans-boundary transport to summertime air quality in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2035–2051, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2035-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2035-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Xing, L., Wu, J., Elser, M., Tong, S., Liu, S., Li, X., Liu, L., Cao, J., Zhou, J., El-Haddad, I., Huang, R., Ge, M., Tie, X., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Li, G.: Wintertime secondary organic aerosol formation in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH): contributions of HONO sources and heterogeneous reactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2343–2359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2343-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-2343-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Yu, X.-Y., Cary, R. A., and Laulainen, N. S.: Primary and secondary organic carbon downwind of Mexico City, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6793–6814, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6793-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6793-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H. and Ying, Q.: Secondary organic aerosol formation and source
apportionment in Southeast Texas, Atmos. Environ., 45, 3217–3227,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.046</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., He, K. B., Huo, H., Kannari, A., Klimont, Z., Park, I. S., Reddy, S., Fu, J. S., Chen, D., Duan, L., Lei, Y., Wang, L. T., and Yao, Z. L.: Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B mission, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5131–5153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Jing, J., Tao, J., Hsu, S.-C., Wang, G., Cao, J., Lee, C. S. L., Zhu, L., Chen, Z., Zhao, Y., and Shen, Z.: Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing: seasonal perspective, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7053–7074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X. Y., Wang, Y. Q., Niu, T., Zhang, X. C., Gong, S. L., Zhang, Y. M., and Sun, J. Y.: Atmospheric aerosol compositions in China: spatial/temporal variability, chemical signature, regional haze distribution and comparisons with global aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 779–799, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-779-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-779-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page8207?><ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X. Y., Wang, J. Z., Wang, Y. Q., Liu, H. L., Sun, J. Y., and Zhang, Y. M.: Changes in chemical components of aerosol particles in different haze regions in China from 2006 to 2013 and contribution of meteorological factors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12935–12952, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12935-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12935-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, J., Levitt, N. P., Zhang, R., and Chen, J.: Heterogeneous reactions of
methylglyoxal in acidic media: Implications for secondary organic aerosol
formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 7682–7687, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es060610k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es060610k</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, P. S., Dong, F., He, D., Zhao, X. J., Zhang, X. L., Zhang, W. Z., Yao, Q., and Liu, H. Y.: Characteristics of concentrations and chemical compositions for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the region of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4631–4644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., He, K. B., Wang, K., Zheng, G. J., Duan, F. K., Ma, Y. L., and Kimoto, T.: Heterogeneous chemistry: a mechanism missing in current models to explain secondary inorganic aerosol formation during the January 2013 haze episode in North China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2031–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Effects of organic coating on the nitrate formation by suppressing the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> heterogeneous hydrolysis: a case study during wintertime in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Although stringent emission mitigation strategies have
been carried out since 2013 in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH), China, heavy
haze with high levels of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) still
frequently engulfs the region during wintertime and the nitrate contribution
to PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass has progressively increased. N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>
heterogeneous hydrolysis is the most important pathway of nitrate
formation at nighttime. In the present study, the WRF-Chem model is applied
to simulate a heavy haze episode from 10 to 27 February 2014 in BTH to
evaluate contributions of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> heterogeneous hydrolysis to
nitrate formation and effects of organic coating. The model generally
performs reasonably well in simulating meteorological parameters, air
pollutants, and aerosol species against observations in BTH.
N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> heterogeneous hydrolysis with all the secondary organic
aerosol assumed to be involved in coating considerably improves the nitrate
simulations compared to the measurements in Beijing. On average, organic
coating decreases nitrate concentrations by 8.4&thinsp;% in BTH during an
episode, and N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> heterogeneous hydrolysis with organic
coating contributes about 30.1&thinsp;% of nitrate concentrations. Additionally,
the reaction also plays a considerable role in the heavy haze formation,
with a PM<sub>2.5</sub> contribution of about 11.6&thinsp;% in BTH. Sensitivity studies
also reveal that future studies need to be conducted to predict the organic
aerosol hygroscopicity for accurately representing the organic coating
effect on N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> heterogeneous hydrolysis.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J.
A., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D.,
Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna,
M. R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Prévôt, A. S. H., Dommen, J.,
Duplissy, J., Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and Jimenez, J. L.: O / C and
OM / OC Ratios of Primary, Secondary, and Ambient Organic Aerosols with
High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci.
Techn., 42, 4478–4485, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Anttila, T., Kiendlerscharr, A., Tillmann, R., and Mentel, T. F.: On the
reactive uptake of gaseous compounds by organic-coated aqueous aerosols:
theoretical analysis and application to the heterogeneous hydrolysis of
N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 10435–10443,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp062403c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp062403c</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bei, N., Wu, J., Elser, M., Feng, T., Cao, J., El-Haddad, I., Li, X., Huang, R., Li, Z., Long, X., Xing, L., Zhao, S., Tie, X., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Li, G.: Impacts of meteorological uncertainties on the haze formation in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) during wintertime: a case study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14579–14591, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14579-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14579-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bertram, T. H. and Thornton, J. A.: Toward a general parameterization of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> reactivity on aqueous particles: the competing effects of particle liquid water, nitrate and chloride, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8351–8363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8351-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8351-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Binkowski, F. S. and Roselle, S. J.: Models-3 Community Multiscale Air
Quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component 1. Model description, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 108, 335–346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001409" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001409</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Boylan, J. W. and Russell, A. G.: PM and light extinction model performance
metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models,
Atmos. Environ., 40, 4946–4959,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, S. S., Ryerson, T. B., Wollny, A. G., Brock, C. A., Peltier, R.,
Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., Dubé, W. P., Trainer, M., and Meagher, J.
F.: Variability in Nocturnal Nitrogen Oxide Processing and Its Role in
Regional Air Quality, Science, 311, 67–70, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1120120" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1120120</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, S. S., Dubé, W. P., Tham, Y. J., Zha, Q., Xue, L., Poon, S.,
Wang, Z., Blake, D. R., Tsui, W., Parrish, D. D., and Wang, T.: Nighttime
chemistry at a high altitude site above Hong Kong, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
121, 2457–2475, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024566" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024566</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Ho, K. F., Zou, S. C., Fung, K., Li, Y., Watson, J.
G., and Chow, J. C.: Spatial and seasonal variations of atmospheric organic
carbon and elemental carbon in Pearl River Delta Region, China, Atmos.
Environ., 38, 4447–4456, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.016</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Ho, K. F., Zhang, R. J.,
Jin, Z. D., Shen, Z. X., Chen, G. C., Kang, Y. M., Zou, S. C., Zhang, L. Z.,
Qi, S. H., Dai, M. H., Cheng, Y., and Hu, K.: Spatial and seasonal
distributions of carbonaceous aerosols over China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
112, D22S11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008205" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008205</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, W. L., Bhave, P. V., Brown, S. S., Riemer, N., Stutz, J., and Dabdub,
D.: Heterogeneous Atmospheric Chemistry, Ambient Measurements, and Model
Calculations of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>: A Review, Aerosol Sci.  Technol., 45,
665–695, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.551672" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.551672</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model
with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation
and sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129&lt;0569:CAALSH&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129&lt;0569:CAALSH&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Wolke, R., Ran, L., Birmili, W., Spindler, G., Schröder, W., Su, H., Cheng, Y., Tegen, I., and Wiedensohler, A.: A parameterization of the heterogeneous hydrolysis of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> for mass-based aerosol models: improvement of particulate nitrate prediction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 673–689, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-673-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-673-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Ministry of Environmental Protection, China (China MEP): Air Quality Observation Real-time Release Platform of MEP Data Center, available at: <a href="http://106.37.208.233:20035" target="_blank">http://106.37.208.233:20035</a> (last access: 20 June 2019), 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Ministry of Environmental Protection, China (China MEP): Online Monitoring and Analysis Platform of China Air Quality, available at: <a href="http://www.aqistudy.cn" target="_blank">http://www.aqistudy.cn</a> (last access: 20 June 2019), 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chou, M. D. and Suarez, M. J.: A solar radiation parameterization for
atmospheric studies, edited by: Suarez, M. J., No. NASA/TM-1999-10460, NASA Technique Report, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Chou, M. D., Suarez, M. J., Liang, X. Z., Yan, M. H., and Cote, C.: A
Thermal Infrared Radiation Parameterization for Atmospheric Studies, edited by: Suarez, M. J., No. NASA/TM-2001-104606, NASA Technique Report, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Davis, J. M., Bhave, P. V., and Foley, K. M.: Parameterization of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> reaction probabilities on the surface of particles containing ammonium, sulfate, and nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5295–5311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5295-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5295-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dentener, F. J. and Crutzen, P. J.: Reaction of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> on
tropospheric aerosols: Impact on the global distributions of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>,
O<sub>3</sub>, and OH, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 7149–7163,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02979" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02979</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Dunker, A. M., Morris, R. E., Pollack, A. K., Schleyer, C. H., and Yarwood,
G: Photochemical modeling of the impact of fuels and vehicles on urban ozone
using auto oil program data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 787–801,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es950175m" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es950175m</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Evans, M. J. and Jacob, D. J.: Impact of new laboratory studies of
N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> hydrolysis on global model budgets of tropospheric nitrogen
oxides, ozone, and OH, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 297–314,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022469" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022469</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, T., Li, G., Cao, J., Bei, N., Shen, Z., Zhou, W., Liu, S., Zhang, T., Wang, Y., Huang, R.-J., Tie, X., and Molina, L. T.: Simulations of organic aerosol concentrations during springtime in the Guanzhong Basin, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10045–10061, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10045-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10045-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K<sup>+</sup> − Ca<sup>2+</sup> − Mg<sup>2+</sup> − NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> − Na<sup>+</sup> − SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> − NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> − Cl<sup>−</sup> − H<sub>2</sub>O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, M., Carmichael, G. R., Wang, Y., Saide, P. E., Yu, M., Xin, J., Liu, Z., and Wang, Z.: Modeling study of the 2010 regional haze event in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1673–1691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1673-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1673-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G.,
Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled “online” chemistry within
the WRF model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron, C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3181–3210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J., Shang, D., Zheng, J., Du, Z., Wu,
Z., Shao, M., and Zeng, L.: Elucidating severe urban haze formation in
China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 17373–17378,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hess, P. G., Flocke, S., Lamarque, J. F., Barth, M. C., and Madronich, S.:
Episodic modeling of the chemical structure of the troposphere as revealed
during the spring MLOPEX 2 intensive, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105,
809–839, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hong, S. Y. and Lim, J. O. J.: The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics
Scheme (WSM6), Asia-Pacif. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 129–151, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Horowitz, L. W., Walters, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Emmons, L. K., Rasch, P. J.,
Granier, C., Tie, X., Lamarque, J. F., Schultz, M. G., Tyndall, G. S.,
Orlando, J. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: A global simulation of tropospheric
ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4784, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002853" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002853</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Janjić, Z. I.: Nonsingular Implementation of the Mellor-Yamada Level 2.5
Scheme in the NCEP Meso Model, NCEP Office Note 437, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P.
I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrnann, S., Weimer,
S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A.,
Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, M. Y., Dzepina,
K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A.
M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E.,
Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the
atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, Y. J., Spak, S. N., Carmichael, G. R., Riemer, N., and Stanier, C. O.:
Modeled aerosol nitrate formation pathways during wintertime in the Great
Lakes region of North America, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 12420–12445,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022320" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022320</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Zhang, R., Fan, J., and Tie, X.: Impacts of black carbon aerosol on
photolysis and ozone, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D23206,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005898" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005898</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Lei, W., Zavala, M., Volkamer, R., Dusanter, S., Stevens, P., and Molina, L. T.: Impacts of HONO sources on the photochemistry in Mexico City during the MCMA-2006/MILAGO Campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6551–6567, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6551-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6551-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Bei, N., Tie, X., and Molina, L. T.: Aerosol effects on the photochemistry in Mexico City during MCMA-2006/MILAGRO campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5169–5182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5169-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5169-2011</a>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Zavala, M., Lei, W., Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Pandis, S. N., Canagaratna, M. R., and Molina, L. T.: Simulations of organic aerosol concentrations in Mexico City using the WRF-CHEM model during the MCMA-2006/MILAGRO campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3789–3809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3789-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3789-2011</a>, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Lei, W., Bei, N., and Molina, L. T.: Contribution of garbage burning to chloride and PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Mexico City, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8751–8761, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8751-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8751-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Bei, N., Cao, J., Huang, R., Wu, J., Feng, T., Wang, Y., Liu, S., Zhang, Q., Tie, X., and Molina, L. T.: A possible pathway for rapid growth of sulfate during haze days in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3301–3316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3301-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3301-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X., Wu, J., Elser, M., Feng, T., Cao, J., El-Haddad, I., Huang, R., Tie, X., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Li, G.: Contributions of residential coal combustion to the air quality in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH), China: a case study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10675–10691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10675-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10675-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Liggio, J., Li, S. M., and McLaren, R.: Reactive uptake of glyoxal by
particulate matter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D10304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005113</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, W., Shen, G., Chen, Y., Shen, H., Huang, Y., Li, T., Wang, Y., Fu, X.,
Tao, S., Liu, W., Huang-Fu, Y., Zhang, W., Xue, C., Liu, G., Wu, F., and
Wong, M.: Air pollution and inhalation exposure to particulate matter of
different sizes in rural households using improved stoves in central China,
J. Environ. Sci.-China, 63, 87–95, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.06.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.06.019</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lowe, D., Archer-Nicholls, S., Morgan, W., Allan, J., Utembe, S., Ouyang, B., Aruffo, E., Le Breton, M., Zaveri, R. A., Di Carlo, P., Percival, C., Coe, H., Jones, R., and McFiggans, G.: WRF-Chem model predictions of the regional impacts of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> heterogeneous processes on night-time chemistry over north-western Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1385–1409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1385-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1385-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009604003981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009604003981</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Riemer, N., Vogel, H., Vogel, B., Schell, B., Ackermann, I., Kessler, C.,
and Hass, H.: Impact of the heterogeneous hydrolysis of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> on
chemistry and nitrate aerosol formation in the lower troposphere under
photosmog conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., D4, 4144,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002436" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002436</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Riemer, N., Vogel, H., Vogel, B., Anttila, T., Kiendler-Scharr, A., and
Mentel, T.F.: Relative importance of organic coatings for the heterogeneous
hydrolysis of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> during summer in Europe, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 114, D17307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011369" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011369</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K.,Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pandis, S. N., and Pierce, J. R.:
Rethinking organic aerosols: semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, 2nd Edn., John Wiley &amp; Sons Inc., New
York, USA, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M. K., Lane, T. E., Donahue, N. M., Pandis, S. N., and
Robinson, A. L.: Effects of gas particle partitioning and aging of primary
emissions on urban and regional organic aerosol concentrations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D18301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009735" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009735</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Strader, R.: Evaluation of secondary organic aerosol formation in winter,
Atmos. Environ., 33, 4849–4863, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00310-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00310-6</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Su, X., Tie, X., Li, G., Cao, J., Huang, R., Feng, T., Long, X., and Xu, R.: Effect of hydrolysis of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> on nitrate and ammonium formation in Beijing China: WRF-Chem model simulation, Sci. Total Environ., 579, 221–229, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J., and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Du, W., Zhang, Q., Wang, Q. Q., Fu, P. Q., Pan, X. L., Li, J., Jayne, J., and Worsnop, D. R.: Long-term real-time measurements of aerosol particle composition in Beijing, China: seasonal variations, meteorological effects, and source analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10149–10165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, J., Zhang, L., Cao, J., and Zhang, R.: A review of current knowledge concerning PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical composition, aerosol optical properties and their relationships across China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9485–9518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9485-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9485-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, K. E.: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single
diagram, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 7183–7192,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Tie, X., Madronich, S., Walters, S., Zhang, R., Rasch, P., and Collins, W.:
Effect of clouds on photolysis and oxidants in the troposphere, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 108, 4642, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003659" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003659</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Volkamer, R., Martini, F. S., Molina, L. T., Salcedo, D., Jimenez, J. L.,
and Molina, M. J.: A missing sink for gas-phase glyoxal in Mexico City:
Formation of secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030752" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030752</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M. E., Yang, L., Levy Zamora, M., Hu, M., Lin,
Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., Meng, J., Li, J., Cheng, C., Hu, T., Ren, Y., Wang,
Y., Gao, J., Cao, J., An, Z., Zhou, W., Li, G., Wang, J., Tian, P.,
Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zeng, L.,
Shao, M., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B.,
Cai, L., Cheng, Y., Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Rosenfeld, D., Liss, P. S., Duce, R.
A., Kolb, C. E., and Molina, M. J.: Persistent sulfate formation from London
Fog to Chinese haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13630–13635,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H., Lu, K., Chen, X., Zhu, Q., Chen, Q., Guo, S., Jiang, M., Li, X.,
Shang, D., Tan, Z., Wu, Y., Wu, Z., Zou, Q., Zheng, Y., Zeng, L., Zhu, T.,
Hu, M., and Zhang, Y.: High N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> concentrations observed in urban
Beijing: Implications of a large nitrate formation Pathway, Environ. Sci.
Tech. Lett., 4, 416–420, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00341" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00341</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Hoffmann, A. A., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., and Martin, S. T.:
Global distribution of solid and aqueous sulfate aerosols: Effect of the
hysteresis of particle phase transitions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113,
D11206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009367" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009367</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, S., Shen, G., Zhang, Y., Xue, M., Xie, H., Lin, P., Chen, Y., Wang, X.
and Tao, S.: Field measurement on the emissions of PM, OC, EC and PAHs from
indoor crop straw burning in rural China, Environ. Pollut., 184, 18–24,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.036</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wesely, M. L.: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry
deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23,
1293–1304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, J., Li, G., Cao, J., Bei, N., Wang, Y., Feng, T., Huang, R., Liu, S., Zhang, Q., and Tie, X.: Contributions of trans-boundary transport to summertime air quality in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2035–2051, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2035-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2035-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Xing, L., Wu, J., Elser, M., Tong, S., Liu, S., Li, X., Liu, L., Cao, J., Zhou, J., El-Haddad, I., Huang, R., Ge, M., Tie, X., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Li, G.: Wintertime secondary organic aerosol formation in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH): contributions of HONO sources and heterogeneous reactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2343–2359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2343-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2343-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, X.-Y., Cary, R. A., and Laulainen, N. S.: Primary and secondary organic carbon downwind of Mexico City, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6793–6814, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6793-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6793-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H. and Ying, Q.: Secondary organic aerosol formation and source
apportionment in Southeast Texas, Atmos. Environ., 45, 3217–3227,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.046</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., He, K. B., Huo, H., Kannari, A., Klimont, Z., Park, I. S., Reddy, S., Fu, J. S., Chen, D., Duan, L., Lei, Y., Wang, L. T., and Yao, Z. L.: Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B mission, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5131–5153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Jing, J., Tao, J., Hsu, S.-C., Wang, G., Cao, J., Lee, C. S. L., Zhu, L., Chen, Z., Zhao, Y., and Shen, Z.: Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Beijing: seasonal perspective, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7053–7074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X. Y., Wang, Y. Q., Niu, T., Zhang, X. C., Gong, S. L., Zhang, Y. M., and Sun, J. Y.: Atmospheric aerosol compositions in China: spatial/temporal variability, chemical signature, regional haze distribution and comparisons with global aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 779–799, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-779-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-779-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X. Y., Wang, J. Z., Wang, Y. Q., Liu, H. L., Sun, J. Y., and Zhang, Y. M.: Changes in chemical components of aerosol particles in different haze regions in China from 2006 to 2013 and contribution of meteorological factors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12935–12952, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12935-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12935-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, J., Levitt, N. P., Zhang, R., and Chen, J.: Heterogeneous reactions of
methylglyoxal in acidic media: Implications for secondary organic aerosol
formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 7682–7687, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es060610k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es060610k</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, P. S., Dong, F., He, D., Zhao, X. J., Zhang, X. L., Zhang, W. Z., Yao, Q., and Liu, H. Y.: Characteristics of concentrations and chemical compositions for PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the region of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4631–4644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., He, K. B., Wang, K., Zheng, G. J., Duan, F. K., Ma, Y. L., and Kimoto, T.: Heterogeneous chemistry: a mechanism missing in current models to explain secondary inorganic aerosol formation during the January 2013 haze episode in North China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2031–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
