<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-7335-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Temporal variations and trend of ground-level ozone based on long-term measurements in Windsor, Canada</article-title><alt-title>Ground-level ozone in Windsor, Canada</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Ground-level ozone in Windsor, Canada}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{X. Xu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Xiaohong</given-names></name>
          <email>xxu@uwindsor.ca</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Tianchu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>Yushan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Toronto, Ontario, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Xiaohong Xu (xxu@uwindsor.ca)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>7335</fpage><lpage>7345</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>14</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>22</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e104">This study investigates temporal variations and long-term (1996–2015) trends
of ground-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ozone) and its precursors, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (nitrogen
oxides),
and volatile organic compounds in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. During the
20-year study period, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, non-methane hydrocarbon concentrations, and ozone
formation potential decreased significantly by 58 %, 61 %, and 73 %,
respectively, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased by 33 % (20.3 ppb in
1996 vs. 27 ppb in 2015). Our analysis revealed that the increased annual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Windsor were due to (1) decreased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
titration (by 50 % between 1996 and 2015) owing to declining nitric
oxide concentrations, which is suggested by a slightly decreasing trend of
annual mean total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations after the titration effect is
removed, (2) reduced local photochemical production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because of
dwindling precursor emissions, and (3) an increased background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level
that has a greater impact on the low-to-median concentrations. The net effect of
those factors is decreasing peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels during the smog season from
May to September but an overall increasing trend of annual means. These
results indicate that the emission control measures are effective in
reducing peak ozone concentrations. However, challenges in lowering annual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels call for long-term collaborative efforts in the region and
around the globe.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e238">Ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the ground level is a main component of smog. Exposure to
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations causes wheezing and shortness of breath,
resulting in absence from schools and hospital admissions (USEPA, 2018).
People with respiratory diseases, children, and elders are at higher risk
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure. Recent studies suggest that long-term exposure to
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels is associated with permanent lung damage and deaths
from respiratory causes (USEPA, 2018). High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations also
result in reduced crop yields by inhibiting breathing ability of plants,
slowing down the photosynthesis rates, and making plants more susceptible to
diseases (IDNR, 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e296">As a secondary air pollutant, ground-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is formed by
photochemical reactions between nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) in the presence of sunlight. Non-methane hydrocarbons
(NMHCs) are more reactive than methane and other VOCs in forming ozone (NAS,
1999); therefore, NMHCs are used to represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors (e.g., Jun
et al., 2007; Akimoto et al., 2015). Because the reactivity of each NMHC is
different, Carter (1994) and other researchers used <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation
potential (OFP) to quantify contributions of individual NMHCs or a group of
NMHCs (Jia et al., 2016). Similarly, a study in Hong Kong investigated
associations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its precursors, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 21
NMHCs,
during 2005–2014 (Wang et al., 2017). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Hong Kong
increased (0.56 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The study further showed that there were no
significant changes in NMHCs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the
10-year study period. Nevertheless, the calculated daytime average
contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations by aromatics decreased (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while that by alkenes increased (0.14 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and that by alkanes and biogenic VOCs did not change
significantly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.24 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Wang et al., 2017).</p>
      <?pagebreak page7336?><p id="d1e598">In Ontario, Canada, emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOCs decreased by 52 % (from 651
to 311 kt) and 54 % (from 789 to 363 kt),
respectively,
during 1996–2015 (ECCC, 2018a). However, the Ontario-wide <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composite mean
increased by 22 %, from 22.4 ppb in 1996 (MOE, 2006) to 27.4 ppb in 2015
(MOECC, 2017). Previous studies showed that changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were attributed to background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and changes in
photochemical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production caused by the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC
concentrations (e.g., Shin et al., 2012). Because NO (nitric oxide) reacts
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (nitrogen dioxide) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, also known as
NO titration, decreased NO concentrations may lead to increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations due to weakened titration effect (Sicard et al., 2011; Akimoto
et al., 2015). To remove the impact of the NO titration on ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, total ozone (TO) was previously employed in trend
analysis. For example, Akimoto et al. (2015) used TO in their ambient ozone
study in four areas in Japan where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were high (i.e.,
Tokyo, Nagoya, Osaka, and Fukuoka). During the 20-year study period, NO
concentrations decreased from 16 ppb in 1990 to 6 ppb in 2010. The
increasing rates of annual TO (0–0.22 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were much smaller than those
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.22–0.37 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the four areas during 1990–2010. The
authors concluded that the decrease in the NO titration effect was one of
the causes for the increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Japan.</p>
      <p id="d1e781">Recently, continuous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations (2 years or longer) from more than
9600 stationary platforms around the world were assembled to assess a suite
of metrics relevant to its impact on human health, vegetation, and climate
under the International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC) Tropospheric
Ozone Assessment Report (TOAR) project (Schultz et al., 2017; IGAC, 2018).
Using 2010–2014 means from over 3300 vegetation sites, the highest ozone
levels were found in midlatitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, including
the southern USA; the Mediterranean Basin; northern India; northern, northwestern, and
eastern China; the Republic of Korea, and Japan (Mills et al., 2018). In a
study of over 2000 monitoring sites worldwide, negative (i.e. decreasing)
trends in peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (i.e. fourth-highest daily maximum 8 h
average) were observed at most North American sites and at some European
sites, with very few sites exhibiting positive trends (Fleming et al., 2018).
Similar studies reported that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels (monthly mean of the daytime
average and monthly mean of the daily maximum 8 h average) continued to
decrease significantly over eastern North America and Europe, while Asia
experienced increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations through the end of 2014 (Chang
et al., 2017; Gaudel et al., 2018). In eastern North America, summertime
daytime averages and daily maximum 8 h concentrations declined at a
slower rate at urban sites than at rural sites during 2000–2014 (Chang et
al., 2017). Those studies showed that, over North America and Europe,
decreasing peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are attributable to reduction in precursor
emissions, and a relatively slower decreasing rate at urban locations
suggests weakened <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> titration. In Asia, growing precursor emissions
led to increasing ozone concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d1e852">Built on our understanding of spatial variations (Fleming et al., 2018;
Mills et al., 2018), this study evaluated temporal variations and trends of
ground-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its precursors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC) in Windsor, an urban
location in Southern Ontario, Canada, during the 20-year study period of
1996–2015. The main objective was to identify the driving force of long-term
trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Windsor during the past 20 years as
well as seasonal and diurnal variations. Findings of this study will shed
light on the effectiveness of emission control policies and help develop
feasible approaches for reducing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in this region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Selection of station in Windsor</title>
      <p id="d1e914">There are two air quality monitoring stations in Windsor, Windsor Downtown
and Windsor West, which are 3.5 km apart (Fig. 1). Both stations monitor
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a number of common air pollutions (e.g., NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; MECP, 2018). The Windsor Downtown station was
selected in this study due to (1) fewer invalid or missing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
(1824 vs. 2660 during 1996–2015) and (2) a longer record of NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data available (1996–2015) compared to the Windsor West station
(2001–2015); 24 h VOC samples were collected once every 6 d
at the Windsor West station (ECCC, 2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1006">Air quality monitoring stations in Windsor, Ontario, Canada.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7335/2019/acp-19-7335-2019-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Data sources</title>
      <p id="d1e1023">Hourly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Windsor
(1996–2015) were obtained from the Ontario Ministry of the Environment,
Conservation and Parks (MECP); 24 h VOC data at the Windsor West
station during 1996–2015 were downloaded from National Air Pollution
Surveillance (NAPS) website (ECCC, 2018b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Data processing</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{O_{3}}$}, NO, {$\protect\chem{NO_{2}}$}, {$\protect\chem{NO_{\mathit{x}}}$}, and VOC concentrations and
ratios}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and VOC concentrations and
ratios</title>
      <p id="d1e1107">Numbers of data flags “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">999</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” (i.e., invalid data), blank cells, and “0”
data points in hourly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
were counted by year. Then data flags <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">999</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were replaced with blank
cells to maintain consecutive date and time for individual pollutants. If the
total percentage of data flags and blank cells is greater than 40 % (3504 h yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in a year, data in that year are considered to be invalid and excluded
from further analysis. This is the case for hourly NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in 2003. Results of data screening can be found in
Zhang (2016) and in the Supplement (Table S1).</p>
      <?pagebreak page7337?><p id="d1e1198">There are 176 VOCs reported in the NAPS dataset, of which 118 were
used in this study. Missing samples were identified by comparing the
sampling schedule with the dates of available samples in each year. Blank
and 0 cells were counted for individual compounds in each year. A
compound is excluded from analysis if the total number of blank and 0
cells is greater than 70 % during the study period of 1996–2015. Blank and
0 cells were also counted for each sample. Samples with less than 60 % of
compounds that registered valid readings were removed. To reduce the undue
influence of a few unusual events with extremely high concentrations,
outliers were identified and removed.</p>
      <p id="d1e1201">Sixteen NMHCs were excluded from analysis because less than 30 % of
samples had valid readings. Thus, 102 compounds were retained for further
analysis. Out of 877 samples, 14 were excluded. The remaining 863 samples each
had at least 60 % compounds with valid readings (range of 64 %–100 %,
mean of 88 %, and median of 91 %), and they were used to calculate total NMHCs
and OFPs. Daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-NMHC ratios (referred to as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-VOC ratios
hereafter) were calculated for the dates when VOC data are available. Hourly
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were calculated as well.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Total {$\protect\chem{O_{3}}$} concentrations}?><title>Total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e1264">Following Akimoto et al. (2015), TO in Windsor was calculated with Eq. (1),

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TO</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] ([<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>])
represents loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due
to in situ NO titration; [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], and [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] are hourly
concentrations; and the constant 0.1 is the fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in primary
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Itano et al., 2007). In this study, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fraction was determined from the slopes of regression of [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]) vs. [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] in Windsor in each year during the
morning NO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak hours (from 05:00 to 08:00; all times are referred to in
local time – LT) as described in
Kurtenbach et al.  (2012). The 20-year average fraction was 0.1, consistent
with that in the previous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> study in Japan (Itano et al., 2007).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>NMHC concentrations and ozone formation potential</title>
      <p id="d1e1577">OFPs for individual VOCs were calculated using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), as
described in Yan et al. (2017),
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M116" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OFP</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Conc</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MIR</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where Conc<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ambient concentration of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th
NMHC, and MIR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the corresponding maximum incremental reactivity
coefficient in the unit of grams of ozone formed per gram of VOC added in the
system (Carter, 1999). OFPs for individual samples in each year were
calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Temporal variation and trend</title>
      <p id="d1e1667">The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine whether there were
statistical differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TO concentrations between weekdays
and weekends. Linear regression was employed to examine long-term
(1996–2015) trends of (1) annual means and means in the smog (May–September)
and non-smog season (October–April) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TO; (2) the annual mean for
NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, OFP, D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMHC concentrations, and the ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and (3) various annual percentile levels (5th, 25th,
50th, 75th, and 95th) of hourly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TO.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7338?><p id="d1e1752">Hourly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, TO, and D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations do not follow a normal
distribution. Thus, the Mann–Kendall test, a non-parametric trend detection
method (Gilbert, 1987), was used to detect long-term trends in each month of
a year and at each hour in a day. Sen's method (Sen, 1968) was used to
estimate the slope of seasonal and diurnal trends when the trend is
significant at the 95 % level. Long-term trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TO in
Windsor were compared to quantify the impact of the NO titration on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1799">All analyses outlined in Sect. 2.3–2.4 were carried out in Minitab
version  16 (Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania, USA) and MATLAB
release 2017a (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>General statistics</title>
      <p id="d1e1818">As shown in Table 1, the 20-year mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was 24 ppb in
Windsor. Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels were observed in the smog season than the
non-smog season, reflecting photochemical production under sunny and warm
conditions. TO concentrations were higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in all
seasons and at all concentration percentile levels because TO includes the
fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lost through the NO titration. TO concentrations showed
lower variability (i.e., lower coefficient of variation) than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, which is expected because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reacts with NO while TO is
not affected by the NO titration (Akimoto et al., 2015).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1891">General statistics of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TO concentrations in Windsor
during 1996–2015 (SD and CV stand for standard deviation and coefficient of
variation, respectively).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Min</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25th</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">75th</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Sample</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pollutant</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Season</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">size</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All months</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">128</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">171 624</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Smog</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">128</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">72 387</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Non-smog</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">99 237</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All months</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">138</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">161 459</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Smog</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">138</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">68 270</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Non-smog</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">118</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">93 189</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Diurnal, seasonal, and weekday–weekend variation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Diurnal variation</title>
      <p id="d1e2255">Diurnal variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Windsor during 1996–2015 is
shown in Fig. 2a and Table S2. There was a gradual increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations from 06:00 to 14:00 and a gradual
decrease from 15:00 to 06:00 next day. A similar trend was observed
for TO. The diurnal variations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TO indicate that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
photochemical production was enhanced by increased solar radiation and
temperature (So and Wang, 2003). D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> followed an opposite trend than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. lower at noon to afternoon (11.2 ppb from 11:00–15:00) than that at other hours of the day (16.2 ppb), suggesting that
relative loss due to the titration effect was reduced when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were high.</p>
      <p id="d1e2336"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were higher during the smog season than in the
non-smog season, especially around noon, due to photochemical production
(Fig. 2b and c). D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels were lower throughout the day in the smog
season, suggesting that relative loss due to the titration effect was reduced
when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were high. Furthermore, TO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
diurnal variation was rather smooth in the non-smog season due to weak
photochemical production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2402">Diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during 1996–2015 in
Windsor for <bold>(a)</bold> all months, <bold>(b)</bold> smog season, and <bold>(c)</bold> non-smog season. CI stands for confidence interval.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7335/2019/acp-19-7335-2019-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Seasonal variation</title>
      <?pagebreak page7339?><p id="d1e2450">Monthly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased from January to May, reaching peak
values in June and July, then decreased from July until the minima in
December (Fig. 3 and Table S3). This seasonal pattern is similar to that of
solar radiation and ambient temperature, which control the photochemical
production rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A similar seasonal variation was observed for
TO, but D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> followed an opposite trend than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. higher in
the non-smog season (16.6 ppb) and lower during the smog season (13.1 ppb). Similar
to the diurnal variation, relative loss due to the titration effect appears
to be reduced when weather conditions favored <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. The seasonal
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern observed in Windsor is consistent with the study by Gaudel
et al. (2018) reporting that in North America, the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> daytime
averages occurred in spring–summer and the minimum values were found in
autumn–winter during 2010–2014.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2533">Monthly mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during 1996–2015
in Windsor.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7335/2019/acp-19-7335-2019-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Weekday–weekend variation</title>
      <p id="d1e2572">ANOVA indicates that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations on weekends (25.9 ppb) were
statistically higher (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than on weekdays (23.3 ppb). NO
concentrations were lower on weekends (6.5 ppb) than on weekdays (9.6 ppb)
due to less vehicular and industrial activities. Therefore, high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations on weekends were likely attributed to decreased NO emissions
and the weakened titration effect as reported by other researchers (Koo et al.,
2012). This is supported by comparable TO concentrations between
weekdays and weekends (39.2 vs. 39.5 ppb, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) which remove
the titration effect. Differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels between the weekday and
weekend were also reported in other studies, e.g., in Nepal (Pudasainee et
al., 2006) and Ontario, Canada (Huryn and Gough, 2014).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Long-term trend</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Trends of annual {$\protect\chem{NO_{\mathit{x}}}$}, NMHC, ozone formation potential, {$\protect\chem{O_{3}}$} and
TO}?><title>Trends of annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMHC, ozone formation potential, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
TO</title>
      <p id="d1e2671">During 1996–2015, annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased significantly
(0.452 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 4a), while annual mean D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
decreased at a greater rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.524</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Consequently, TO
concentrations decreased slightly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.076</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
but not significant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level). In
other words, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased slightly when the NO titration effect is
removed, suggesting that the decreased NO titration effect is one of the
reasons for the increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Windsor.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2789">Annual mean concentrations for <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and TO, and
<bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMHC, and ozone formation potential (OFP) in Windsor during
1996–2015.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7335/2019/acp-19-7335-2019-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2837">Significantly decreasing trends were observed in Windsor for annual mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), NMHC
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
and OFP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the 20-year study period (Fig. 4b). The percent
decreases were 58 %, 61 %, and 73 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMHC, and OFP,
respectively, indicating effective emission control. It should be noted that
during 1996–2008, some pollutants were changing at greater rates compared
with the 20-year trend, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.55 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), NMHC
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and OFP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). After 2008,
concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMHC, and OFP leveled off, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations continued to decrease.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7340?><p id="d1e3113">The decreased NO titration effect was further investigated by examining the
ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S1). Significantly decreased NO
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were observed during the study
period. Furthermore, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio decreased from 0.34 in 1996 to
0.16 in 2015, with an average rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.012</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, supporting the decrease in
the NO titration effect in Windsor. Our results are consistent with studies
in other countries. For example, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio increased from 0.08 in
2005 to 0.15 in 2010 in Japan (Itano et al., 2014), implying a decreased
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NMHC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios did not change much during the
20-year study period (min of 0.96, max of 1.3, and mean and median of 1.1). The low
ratios of VOC to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) suggest that the study area is VOC
limited;
thus reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions may lead to increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
(Sillman, 1999; USEPA, 2000).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>Ozone and TO trends at various percentile levels</title>
      <p id="d1e3324">Figure S2 depicts long-term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TO trends at 5th, 25th,
50th, 75th, and 95th percentiles in Windsor during 1996–2015.
The slopes of linear regression in three scenarios (i.e., all months, the
smog season, and the non-smog season) are summarized in Fig. 5 and Table S4.
Peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (i.e., 95th percentile) decreased
during the smog season and for all months, suggesting that reduced precursor emissions
and photochemical production. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at all other percentile levels in all
three cases had increased, with higher rates at 25th and 50th
percentiles. The 25th percentile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations was
commonly considered to be a background value (Lin et al., 2000; Aleksic et al.,
2011; Parrington et al., 2013). Peak TO concentrations (95th
percentile) deceased, especially during the smog season, due to effective
emission control of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors. TO concentrations increased at all
other percentile levels during the non-smog season, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
photochemical production was limited, suggesting rising background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3407">Slopes of long-term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TO trends at various percentile
levels in all months, smog season, and non-smog season in Windsor during
1996–2015 (red border: significant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; blue border:
significant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; green border: not significant, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7335/2019/acp-19-7335-2019-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3463">In the smog season, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased at the
5th–75th percentile levels, while TO concentrations decreased with
a greater rate at higher percentile levels, suggesting that the decrease in
NO titration is one of the causes of increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Windsor. In terms
of peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (95th percentile), the decreasing rate
of TO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is more than twice that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
In other words, when the effect of NO titration is removed, peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations decreased more intensely due to reduced emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
precursors. During the non-smog season, the increasing rates of TO at
5–75th percentiles were much slower than those of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results
suggest that the decreased NO titration effect could be one of the causes
for slower decrease in peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the smog season and increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at low-to-high percentiles during both the smog and non-smog seasons.</p>
      <p id="d1e3612">The decreasing trend of the 95th percentile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in Windsor
is consistent with the decreasing concentrations at upper end of the
distribution across the United States (Simon et al.,
2015), which evaluated
maximum daily 8 h average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at over 1000 sites during 1998–2013,
when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC emissions were decreasing. The declining peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
also evident in the study of the fourth-highest daily maximum 8 h
concentrations during 2000–2014 by Fleming et al. (2018), which indicated
that up to 70 % of North American stations experienced significant negative
trends (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The results of the seasonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends in
Windsor are consistent with previous studies. For instance, Simon et
al. (2015) reported that the declining trends were more pronounced in summer
than winter and that increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends at all percentiles were
found in both smog and non-smog seasons, except for decreasing peak values at
urban sites of the East North Central region (close to Windsor; Simon et
al., 2015). Moreover, Gaudel et al. (2018) reported the increasing<?pagebreak page7341?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels across North America in wintertime (December, January, and February).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>3.3.3</label><title>Monthly and diurnal rates of change for ozone and TO</title>
      <p id="d1e3713">This section further investigates which hour or hours of a day and which
month or months of a year experienced greater or fewer changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
during the 20-year study period and to what degree those changes could be
explained by the change in the NO titration effect. The estimated
month-of-year slopes by Mann–Kendall and Sen's test during 1996–2015 are
shown in Fig. 6. The rates of change during the smog and non-smog seasons
are summarized in Fig. S3.</p>
      <p id="d1e3727">The increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in the non-smog season
(mean of 0.58 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Fig. S3) suggest a reduced titration effect and rising background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels,
since local photochemical production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is limited. Analysis of
ambient data conducted by USEPA demonstrated that mid-tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in the US and globally have increased over the past two
decades by 0.4 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (USEPA, 2015). Along the Pacific Coast, the rate of
increasing background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated to be 0.5–0.8 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during
1985–2002. This trend of ground-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistent with the rate of
increase (0.51 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1994 to 2002) derived using aircraft measurements
(Jaffe et al., 2003). Another reason of increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the decreased
titration effect. A study in southeastern France demonstrated that the
decrease in the NO titration effect could be one of the reasons for
increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in cold months (Sicard et al., 2011). The
slower increasing rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in smog season (0.32 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. S3) is
a result of increased background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels, a decreased titration
effect,
and reduced local photochemical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production and regional
transport (MOECC, 2017). A similar trend of a greater rate of increasing
composite mean at 19 sites across Ontario in summer (49 %) than in winter
(14 %) during 1991–2010 was largely attributable to the reductions in
local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and the rising global background ozone levels
(MOE, 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e3924"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased while D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations decreased in
all months during 1996–2015 (Fig. 6). During the non-smog season, the increasing
rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.58 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. S3) was higher than the decreasing rate
of D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). In other words, there was an additional
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> beyond the decreased titration effect. After the NO
titration effect is removed, TO concentrations increased in non-smog season
(0.13 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 6), suggesting rising background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. In the smog
season, the increasing rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.32 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was lower than the
decreasing rate of D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). TO concentrations had
decreased in the smog season (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 6), being attributable to the
decreased regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e4132">Monthly rates of change during 1996–2015 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and TO.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7335/2019/acp-19-7335-2019-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4163">On an hourly basis, greater increasing rates in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were
observed at evening and nighttime hours (18:00–03:00) in comparison with the early
morning and daytime (04:00–17:00), as shown in Fig. 7. The two minima in the
morning at 06:00 and 13:00 coincided with the lowest and highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in a day, which were caused by different rates of change in
smog and non-smog seasons (see below). Overall, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased while
D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased at all hours in a day during 1996–2015. The diurnal
pattern of increasing rates for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> almost mirrored that of decreasing
rates for D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In other words, the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
could be explained largely by the decreased NO titration effect. At most
hours, the increasing rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were higher than the decreasing rates
of D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially in the morning hours (06:00–12:00). Overall, TO
concentrations increased slightly during daytime while decreasing a little in
the evening.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4268">Rate of change by hour of day for all months during 1996–2015 for
<bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> TO.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7335/2019/acp-19-7335-2019-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4308"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations showed different diurnal patterns during
the smog season (Fig. 8). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased while D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations decreased at all hours as in the case of all months. During
the daytime (09:00–19:00), there was a sharp decline in the rates of change for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hours (14:00–16:00) followed by a speedy recovery.
The peak hour <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations have not changed much during the last
20 years, and daytime ozone levels have increased with a much slower rate
(09:00–19:00, mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared with the nighttime (20:00–08:00,
mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.46 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The daytime D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreasing trend is similar,
however with less variability. The increasing rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is lower
than the decreasing rate of D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and TO concentrations decreased at all
hours, especially during the afternoon and early evening (14:00–19:00). This
suggested decreased photochemical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation during the smog season
due to emission reduction.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7342?><p id="d1e4471">During the non-smog season (Fig. 9), the rates of change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were similar as in the case of all months, i.e. the increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations could be explained largely by the decreased titration
effect. Also similar to that of all months, the rates of change were lower
in the early morning (05:00–07:00). The greater rates of change were observed in
the late afternoon and evening (16:00–20:00), instead of at night, with all
months. The increasing rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were higher than the decreasing
rates of D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at all hours. The hour-of-day TO trend is overall
increasing with less diurnal variation, indicating rising background
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e4544">Rate of change by hour of day in smog season during 1996–2015 for
<bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> TO.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7335/2019/acp-19-7335-2019-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e4586">Rate of change by hour of day in non-smog season during 1996–2015
for <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> TO.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7335/2019/acp-19-7335-2019-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4636">This study investigates temporal variations and long-term trends (1996–2015)
of ground-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its precursors, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOCs, in Windsor,
Ontario, Canada. The driving force of the observed variations was assessed
by studying precursor emissions, photochemical production, NO titration, and
background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. One of the innovative approaches is the use of
TO and trend analysis for different percentiles levels in different seasons
and by hour of day.</p>
      <p id="d1e4672"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased by 33 % during 1996–2015 (20.3 ppb in
1996 vs. 27 ppb in 2015) in Windsor, while concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)
and NMHCs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">61</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and OFPs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) decreased significantly during the
same time period, owing to effective emission control. Increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were observed in all months in a year and all hours in a day
and at all percentile levels, with a few exceptions.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7343?><p id="d1e4737">Our analysis revealed that the increased annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in
Windsor were caused by the following reasons. First, there was decreased
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> titration and local photochemical production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, both of
which being induced by reduced precursor emissions. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss due to
the titration decreased by 50 % in the 20-year study period, and the
declined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> titration was observed in all months in a year and all
hours in a day. Therefore, the observed increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
can be largely explained by the decrease in the titration. By removing the
titration effect, TO concentrations increased in the non-smog season and
decreased in the smog season, resulting in a slightly decreasing trend of
annual means during 1996–2015 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.076</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The declining photochemical
production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is evident in decreased peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels (95th
percentile) in the smog season as opposed to increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations at all other percentile levels and all percentiles in the
non-smog season. Second, background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level was rising. This is
supported by increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in all months in a year and
all hours in a day and at all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> percentile levels, with the exception
of peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hours and the 95th percentile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in the
smog season. Furthermore, the increasing rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were higher than
the decreasing rate of D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at all hours in a day and all percentile
levels during the non-smog season, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photochemical production is limited.</p>
      <p id="d1e4952">It is apparent that control measures implemented in Ontario and the
surrounding regions were effective in curbing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC emissions during
the study period of 1996–2015. The reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors led to
decreasing peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the smog season over the past 20 years.
However, those emission reductions also result in weakened <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> titration
effect in all months in a year and at all hours in a day. Meanwhile, the
background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations appeared increasing in the study region,
with a greater impact on the low-to-median levels (i.e. 25th and 50th
percentiles) during the non-smog season and at night. The net effect of those
factors is decreasing peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels but an overall increasing annual
mean in Windsor. The increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the non-smog season
(0.58 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), at night (20:00–08:00, 0.46 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and at low-to-median
percentiles pose less of a risk on human health because those <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are
relatively low. The decreasing peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels during the smog season
are
rather beneficial, considering the detrimental effects of human exposure to
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d1e5092">Our long-term (1996–2015) trend analysis shows that annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMHC,
and OFP levels leveled off after 2008, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> titration effect appear to
be continuously decreasing. Considering that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation in Windsor remains to be VOC-limited, the weakened <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
titration by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may lead to slightly increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> annual means.
Moreover, the regional background levels are not expected to decline.
Therefore, it is anticipated that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Windsor may
level off or increase slightly in the next few years under similar weather
conditions. Due to the complex nature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, consumption, and
regional transport, it is clear that long-term regional and international
efforts are essential for lowering <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and improving air
quality. Results of this study provide insight into the causes of changing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in Windsor and how to mitigate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution and its
adverse effects on human health and the environment. Future studies are
warranted to quantify the background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level in Windsor area and its
long-term trend and to explore regional transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to Windsor.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5256">All data used in this study are publicly
accessible. The hourly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Windsor can be accessed through the Ministry of
the Environment, Conservation and Parks Ontario website,<?pagebreak page7344?> <uri>http://airqualityontario.com/history/index.php</uri>
(last access: 26 May 2019); 24 h VOC data in Windsor can be accessed through
Environment and Climate Change Canada website, <uri>http://maps-cartes.ec.gc.ca/rnspa-naps/data.aspx</uri>
(last access: 26 May 2019).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e5297">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7335-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7335-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5306">TZ conducted data analysis and drafted the paper. XX
and YS designed the study and completed the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5312">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5318">The authors would like to thank all who contributed to collection of air
quality data at MECP and ECCC and Yun Zhou at University of Windsor for
processing some VOC data. This project was funded by MECP and the Natural
Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e5323">This research has been supported by the Ontario Ministry of
the Environment, Conservation and Parks and the Natural
Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5329">This paper was edited by Min Shao and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Akimoto, H., Mori, Y., Sasaki, K., Nakanishi, H., Ohizumi, T., and Itano, Y.:
Analysis of monitoring data of ground-level ozone in Japan for long-term
trend during 1990–2010: Causes of temporal and spatial variation, Atmos.
Environ., 102, 302–310, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aleksic, N., Sedefian, L., and Ku, M.: Empirical estimates of summer
background ozone levels in New York State, New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, W. P. L.: Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile
organic compounds, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 44, 881–899, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Carter, W. P. L.: Documentation of the SAPRC-99 chemical mechanism for VOC
reactivity assessment, University of California, Riverside, CA, available at:
<uri>http://www.engr.ucr.edu/~carter/pubs/s99doc.pdf</uri> (last access: 4 June 2018), 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Chang, K. L., Petropavlovskikh, I., Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., and Wang,
T.: Regional trend analysis of surface ozone observations from monitoring
networks in eastern North America, Europe and East Asia, Elem.
Sci. Anth., 5, 50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.243" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.243</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC): Data sources and
methods for the air quality indicators, available at:
<uri>https://www.ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/default.asp?lang=En&amp;n=BA9D8D27-1&amp;offset=4&amp;toc=hide</uri>
(last access: 4 June 2018), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC): Air pollutant emission
inventory – online data search, available at:
<uri>http://ec.gc.ca/inrp-npri/donnees-data/ap/index.cfm?lang=En</uri>, last access: 4 June 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC): NAPS data products, available
at: <uri>http://maps-cartes.ec.gc.ca/rnspa-naps/data.aspx</uri>, last access: 4 June
2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Fleming, Z. L., Doherty, R. M., von Schneidemesser, E., Malley, C. S.,
Cooper, O. R., Pinto, J. P., Colette, A., Xu, X., Simpson, D., Schultz, M.
G., Lefohn, A. S., Hamad, S., Moolla, R., Solberg, S., and Feng, Z.:
Tropospheric ozone assessment report: Present-day ozone distribution and
trends relevant to human health, Elem. Sci. Anth.,
6, 12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.273" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.273</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Gaudel, A., Cooper, O. A., Ancellet, G., et al.: Tropospheric ozone assessment report:
Present-day distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone relevant to
climate and global atmospheric chemistry model evaluation,
Elem. Sci. Anth.,
6, 39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.291" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.291</ext-link>,  2018</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Gilbert, R. O.: Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring,
Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc, New York, NY, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Huryn, S. and Gough, W.: Impact of urbanization on the ozone weekday/weekend
effect in Southern Ontario, Canada, Urban Clim., 8, 11–20, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC), Tropospheric Ozone
Assessment Report, available at:
<uri>http://www.igacproject.org/activities/TOAR</uri>, last access: 16 October 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR): Effects of ground-level ozone,
available at:
<uri>http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environmental-Protection/Air-Quality/Air-Pollutants/Effects-Ozone</uri>, last access:
4 June 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Itano, Y., Bandow, H., Takenaka, N., Saitoh, Y., Asayama, A., and Fukuyama,
J.: Impact of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction on long-term ozone trends in an urban
atmosphere, Sci. Total Environ., 379, 46–55, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Itano, Y., Yamagami, M., and Ohara, T.: Estimation of primary
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission ratio from road vehicles using ambient monitoring data,
Stud. Atmos. Sci., 1, 1–7, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Jaffe, D., Price, H., Parrish, D., Goldstein, A., and Harris, J.: Increasing
background ozone during spring on the west coast of North America, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 30, 1–4, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Jia, C., Mao, X., Huang, T., Liang, X., Wang, Y., Shen, Y., Jiang, W., Wang,
H., Bai, Z., Ma, M. and Yu, Z.: Non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) and their
contribution to ozone formation potential in a petrochemical industrialized
city, Northwest China, Atmos. Res., 169, 225–236, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Jun, T., Xia, Z. G., Wang, H. and Li, W.: Temporal variations in surface
ozone and its precursors and meteorological effects at an urban site in
China, Atmos. Res., 85, 310–337, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Koo, B., Jung, J., Pollack, A. K., Lindhjem, C., Jimenez, M., and Yarwood,
G.: Impact of meteorology and anthropogenic emissions on the local and
regional ozone weekend effect in Midwestern US, Atmos. Environ., 57, 13–21,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Kurtenbach, R., Kleffmann, J., Niedojadlo, A., and Wiesen, P.: Primary
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and their impact on air quality in traffic environments in
Germany, Environ. Sci. Europe., 24, 1–8, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7345?><ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, C. Y. C., Jacob, D. J., Munger, J. M., and Fiore, A. M.: Increasing
background ozone in surface air over the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
27, 3465–3468, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Mills, G., Pleijel, H., Malley, C. S., Sinha, B., Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M.
G., Neufeld, H. S., Simpson, D., Sharps, K., Feng, Z., Gerosa, G., Harmens,
H., Kobayashi, K., Saxena, P., Paoletti, E., Sinha, V., and Xu, X.:
Tropospheric ozone assessment report: Present-day tropospheric ozone
distribution and trends relevant to vegetation, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6,
47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.302</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Ministry of the Environment (MOE): Air Quality in Ontario 2006 Report,
Queen's Printer for Ontario, PIBS 6041e, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Ministry of the Environment (MOE): Air Quality in Ontario Report for 2010,
Queen's Printer for Ontario, PIBS 8640e, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC): Air Quality in
Ontario 2015 Report, Queen's Printer for Ontario, ISSN 1710-8136, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP): Search: air
pollutant data, available at:
<uri>http://airqualityontario.com/history/index.php</uri>, last access: 4 June 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>National Academy of Sciences (NAS): Ozone-forming potential of reformulated
gasoline. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, available at:
<uri>https://www.nap.edu/read/9461/chapter/5</uri> (last access: 4 June 2018), 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Parrington, M., Palmer, P. I., Lewis, A. C., Lee, J. D., Rickard,
A. R., Di Carlo, P., Taylor, J. W., Hopkins, J. R., Punjabi, S., Oram,
D. E., Forster, G., Aruffo, E., Moller, S. J., Bauguitte, S. J.-B.,
Allan, J. D., Coe, H., and Leigh, R. J.: Ozone photochemistry in boreal
biomass burning plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7321–7341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7321-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7321-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Pudasainee, D., Sapkota, B., Shrestha, M. L., Kaga, A., Kondo, A., and Inoue,
Y.: Ground level ozone concentrations and its association with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
meteorological parameters in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, Atmos. Environ.,
40, 8081–8087, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Schultz, M. G., Schroder, S., Lyapina, O., et al.: Tropospheric ozone assessment report:
Database and metrics data of global surface ozone observations, Elem. Sci.
Anth., 5, 58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.244" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.244</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Sen, P. K.: Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendalls Tau,
J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379–1389, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Shin, H. J., Cho, K. M., Han, J. S., Kim, J. S., and Kim, Y. P.: The effects
of precursor emission and background concentration changes on the surface
ozone concentration over Korea, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 12, 93–103, 2012.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Sicard, P., Dalstein-Richier, L., and Vas, N.: Annual and seasonal trends of
ambient ozone concentration and its impact on forest vegetation in
Mercantour National Park (South-eastern France) over the 2000–2008 period,
Environ. Pollut., 159, 351–362, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Sillman, S.: The relation between ozone, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hydrocarbons in urban and
polluted rural environments, Atmos. Environ., 33, 1821–1845, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Simon, H., Reff, A., Wells, B. Xing, J., and Frank, N.: Ozone trends across
the United States over a period of decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC Emissions,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 186–195, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
So, K. L. and Wang, T.: On the local and regional influence on ground-level
ozone concentrations in Hong Kong, Environ. Pollut., 123, 307–317, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): The relationships
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and ozone, available at:
<uri>https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pams/97workbook10.pdf</uri> (last
access: 16 August 2018), 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): Implementation of the
2015 primary ozone NAAQS: Issues associated with background ozone, available
at: <uri>https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-03/documents/whitepaper-bgo3-final.pdf</uri>
(last access: 4 June 2018), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): Health effects of
ozone pollution, available at: <uri>https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/health-effects-ozone-pollution</uri>, last
access: 4 June 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Wang, H., Guo, H., Lyu, X., Cheng, H., Ling, Z., Louie, P.
K. K., Simpson, I. J., Meinardi, S., and Blake, D. R.: Long-term
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-precursor relationships in Hong Kong: field observation and model
simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10919–10935, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10919-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-10919-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, Y., Peng, L., Li, R., Li, Y., Li, L., and Bai, H.: Concentration, ozone
formation potential and source analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
in a thermal power station centralized area: A study in Shuozhou, China,
Environ. Pollut., 223, 295–304, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, T.: Long-term trend of ground-level ozone through statistical and
regional transport analysis, Master thesis, University of Windsor, Windsor,
Ontario, Canada, available at: <uri>http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/5880/</uri> (last
access: 4 June 2018), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Temporal variations and trend of ground-level ozone based on long-term measurements in Windsor, Canada</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>This study investigates temporal variations and long-term (1996–2015) trends
of ground-level O<sub>3</sub> (ozone) and its precursors, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> (nitrogen
oxides),
and volatile organic compounds in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. During the
20-year study period, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, non-methane hydrocarbon concentrations, and ozone
formation potential decreased significantly by 58&thinsp;%, 61&thinsp;%, and 73&thinsp;%,
respectively, while O<sub>3</sub> concentrations increased by 33&thinsp;% (20.3&thinsp;ppb in
1996 vs. 27&thinsp;ppb in 2015). Our analysis revealed that the increased annual
O<sub>3</sub> concentrations in Windsor were due to (1) decreased O<sub>3</sub>
titration (by 50&thinsp;% between 1996 and 2015) owing to declining nitric
oxide concentrations, which is suggested by a slightly decreasing trend of
annual mean total O<sub>3</sub> concentrations after the titration effect is
removed, (2) reduced local photochemical production of O<sub>3</sub> because of
dwindling precursor emissions, and (3) an increased background O<sub>3</sub> level
that has a greater impact on the low-to-median concentrations. The net effect of
those factors is decreasing peak O<sub>3</sub> levels during the smog season from
May to September but an overall increasing trend of annual means. These
results indicate that the emission control measures are effective in
reducing peak ozone concentrations. However, challenges in lowering annual
O<sub>3</sub> levels call for long-term collaborative efforts in the region and
around the globe.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Akimoto, H., Mori, Y., Sasaki, K., Nakanishi, H., Ohizumi, T., and Itano, Y.:
Analysis of monitoring data of ground-level ozone in Japan for long-term
trend during 1990–2010: Causes of temporal and spatial variation, Atmos.
Environ., 102, 302–310, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aleksic, N., Sedefian, L., and Ku, M.: Empirical estimates of summer
background ozone levels in New York State, New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, W. P. L.: Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile
organic compounds, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 44, 881–899, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, W. P. L.: Documentation of the SAPRC-99 chemical mechanism for VOC
reactivity assessment, University of California, Riverside, CA, available at:
<a href="http://www.engr.ucr.edu/~carter/pubs/s99doc.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.engr.ucr.edu/~carter/pubs/s99doc.pdf</a> (last access: 4 June 2018), 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, K. L., Petropavlovskikh, I., Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., and Wang,
T.: Regional trend analysis of surface ozone observations from monitoring
networks in eastern North America, Europe and East Asia, Elem.
Sci. Anth., 5, 50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.243" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.243</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC): Data sources and
methods for the air quality indicators, available at:
<a href="https://www.ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/default.asp?lang=En&amp;n=BA9D8D27-1&amp;offset=4&amp;toc=hide" target="_blank">https://www.ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/default.asp?lang=En&amp;n=BA9D8D27-1&amp;offset=4&amp;toc=hide</a>
(last access: 4 June 2018), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC): Air pollutant emission
inventory – online data search, available at:
<a href="http://ec.gc.ca/inrp-npri/donnees-data/ap/index.cfm?lang=En" target="_blank">http://ec.gc.ca/inrp-npri/donnees-data/ap/index.cfm?lang=En</a>, last access: 4 June 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC): NAPS data products, available
at: <a href="http://maps-cartes.ec.gc.ca/rnspa-naps/data.aspx" target="_blank">http://maps-cartes.ec.gc.ca/rnspa-naps/data.aspx</a>, last access: 4 June
2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Fleming, Z. L., Doherty, R. M., von Schneidemesser, E., Malley, C. S.,
Cooper, O. R., Pinto, J. P., Colette, A., Xu, X., Simpson, D., Schultz, M.
G., Lefohn, A. S., Hamad, S., Moolla, R., Solberg, S., and Feng, Z.:
Tropospheric ozone assessment report: Present-day ozone distribution and
trends relevant to human health, Elem. Sci. Anth.,
6, 12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.273" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.273</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Gaudel, A., Cooper, O. A., Ancellet, G., et al.: Tropospheric ozone assessment report:
Present-day distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone relevant to
climate and global atmospheric chemistry model evaluation,
Elem. Sci. Anth.,
6, 39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.291" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.291</a>,  2018
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Gilbert, R. O.: Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring,
Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc, New York, NY, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Huryn, S. and Gough, W.: Impact of urbanization on the ozone weekday/weekend
effect in Southern Ontario, Canada, Urban Clim., 8, 11–20, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC), Tropospheric Ozone
Assessment Report, available at:
<a href="http://www.igacproject.org/activities/TOAR" target="_blank">http://www.igacproject.org/activities/TOAR</a>, last access: 16 October 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR): Effects of ground-level ozone,
available at:
<a href="http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environmental-Protection/Air-Quality/Air-Pollutants/Effects-Ozone" target="_blank">http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environmental-Protection/Air-Quality/Air-Pollutants/Effects-Ozone</a>, last access:
4 June 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Itano, Y., Bandow, H., Takenaka, N., Saitoh, Y., Asayama, A., and Fukuyama,
J.: Impact of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> reduction on long-term ozone trends in an urban
atmosphere, Sci. Total Environ., 379, 46–55, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Itano, Y., Yamagami, M., and Ohara, T.: Estimation of primary
NO<sub>2</sub>∕NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emission ratio from road vehicles using ambient monitoring data,
Stud. Atmos. Sci., 1, 1–7, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Jaffe, D., Price, H., Parrish, D., Goldstein, A., and Harris, J.: Increasing
background ozone during spring on the west coast of North America, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 30, 1–4, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Jia, C., Mao, X., Huang, T., Liang, X., Wang, Y., Shen, Y., Jiang, W., Wang,
H., Bai, Z., Ma, M. and Yu, Z.: Non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) and their
contribution to ozone formation potential in a petrochemical industrialized
city, Northwest China, Atmos. Res., 169, 225–236, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Jun, T., Xia, Z. G., Wang, H. and Li, W.: Temporal variations in surface
ozone and its precursors and meteorological effects at an urban site in
China, Atmos. Res., 85, 310–337, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Koo, B., Jung, J., Pollack, A. K., Lindhjem, C., Jimenez, M., and Yarwood,
G.: Impact of meteorology and anthropogenic emissions on the local and
regional ozone weekend effect in Midwestern US, Atmos. Environ., 57, 13–21,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Kurtenbach, R., Kleffmann, J., Niedojadlo, A., and Wiesen, P.: Primary
NO<sub>2</sub> emissions and their impact on air quality in traffic environments in
Germany, Environ. Sci. Europe., 24, 1–8, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, C. Y. C., Jacob, D. J., Munger, J. M., and Fiore, A. M.: Increasing
background ozone in surface air over the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
27, 3465–3468, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Mills, G., Pleijel, H., Malley, C. S., Sinha, B., Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M.
G., Neufeld, H. S., Simpson, D., Sharps, K., Feng, Z., Gerosa, G., Harmens,
H., Kobayashi, K., Saxena, P., Paoletti, E., Sinha, V., and Xu, X.:
Tropospheric ozone assessment report: Present-day tropospheric ozone
distribution and trends relevant to vegetation, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6,
47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Ministry of the Environment (MOE): Air Quality in Ontario 2006 Report,
Queen's Printer for Ontario, PIBS 6041e, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Ministry of the Environment (MOE): Air Quality in Ontario Report for 2010,
Queen's Printer for Ontario, PIBS 8640e, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC): Air Quality in
Ontario 2015 Report, Queen's Printer for Ontario, ISSN 1710-8136, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP): Search: air
pollutant data, available at:
<a href="http://airqualityontario.com/history/index.php" target="_blank">http://airqualityontario.com/history/index.php</a>, last access: 4 June 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
National Academy of Sciences (NAS): Ozone-forming potential of reformulated
gasoline. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, available at:
<a href="https://www.nap.edu/read/9461/chapter/5" target="_blank">https://www.nap.edu/read/9461/chapter/5</a> (last access: 4 June 2018), 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Parrington, M., Palmer, P. I., Lewis, A. C., Lee, J. D., Rickard,
A. R., Di Carlo, P., Taylor, J. W., Hopkins, J. R., Punjabi, S., Oram,
D. E., Forster, G., Aruffo, E., Moller, S. J., Bauguitte, S. J.-B.,
Allan, J. D., Coe, H., and Leigh, R. J.: Ozone photochemistry in boreal
biomass burning plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7321–7341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7321-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7321-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Pudasainee, D., Sapkota, B., Shrestha, M. L., Kaga, A., Kondo, A., and Inoue,
Y.: Ground level ozone concentrations and its association with NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and
meteorological parameters in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, Atmos. Environ.,
40, 8081–8087, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Schultz, M. G., Schroder, S., Lyapina, O., et al.: Tropospheric ozone assessment report:
Database and metrics data of global surface ozone observations, Elem. Sci.
Anth., 5, 58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.244" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.244</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Sen, P. K.: Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendalls Tau,
J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379–1389, 1968.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Shin, H. J., Cho, K. M., Han, J. S., Kim, J. S., and Kim, Y. P.: The effects
of precursor emission and background concentration changes on the surface
ozone concentration over Korea, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 12, 93–103, 2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Sicard, P., Dalstein-Richier, L., and Vas, N.: Annual and seasonal trends of
ambient ozone concentration and its impact on forest vegetation in
Mercantour National Park (South-eastern France) over the 2000–2008 period,
Environ. Pollut., 159, 351–362, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Sillman, S.: The relation between ozone, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and hydrocarbons in urban and
polluted rural environments, Atmos. Environ., 33, 1821–1845, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Simon, H., Reff, A., Wells, B. Xing, J., and Frank, N.: Ozone trends across
the United States over a period of decreasing NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and VOC Emissions,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 186–195, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
So, K. L. and Wang, T.: On the local and regional influence on ground-level
ozone concentrations in Hong Kong, Environ. Pollut., 123, 307–317, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): The relationships
between NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, NO<sub><i>y</i></sub>, and ozone, available at:
<a href="https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pams/97workbook10.pdf" target="_blank">https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pams/97workbook10.pdf</a> (last
access: 16 August 2018), 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): Implementation of the
2015 primary ozone NAAQS: Issues associated with background ozone, available
at: <a href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-03/documents/whitepaper-bgo3-final.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-03/documents/whitepaper-bgo3-final.pdf</a>
(last access: 4 June 2018), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): Health effects of
ozone pollution, available at: <a href="https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/health-effects-ozone-pollution" target="_blank">https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/health-effects-ozone-pollution</a>, last
access: 4 June 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Wang, H., Guo, H., Lyu, X., Cheng, H., Ling, Z., Louie, P.
K. K., Simpson, I. J., Meinardi, S., and Blake, D. R.: Long-term
O<sub>3</sub>-precursor relationships in Hong Kong: field observation and model
simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10919–10935, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10919-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10919-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, Y., Peng, L., Li, R., Li, Y., Li, L., and Bai, H.: Concentration, ozone
formation potential and source analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
in a thermal power station centralized area: A study in Shuozhou, China,
Environ. Pollut., 223, 295–304, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, T.: Long-term trend of ground-level ozone through statistical and
regional transport analysis, Master thesis, University of Windsor, Windsor,
Ontario, Canada, available at: <a href="http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/5880/" target="_blank">http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/5880/</a> (last
access: 4 June 2018), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
