<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-7319-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Atmospheric evolution of molecular-weight-separated<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> brown carbon from
biomass burning</article-title><alt-title>Evolution of biomass burning BrC</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Evolution of biomass burning BrC}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. P. S. Wong et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>Jenny P. S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8729-8166</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Tsagkaraki</surname><given-names>Maria</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Tsiodra</surname><given-names>Irini</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5392-8986</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Mihalopoulos</surname><given-names>Nikolaos</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Violaki</surname><given-names>Kalliopi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kanakidou</surname><given-names>Maria</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1724-9692</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Sciare</surname><given-names>Jean</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3 aff4 aff7">
          <name><surname>Nenes</surname><given-names>Athanasios</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3873-9970</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Weber</surname><given-names>Rodney J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0765-8035</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30331, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Environmental Chemical Processes Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>ICE-HT, Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas, 26504 Patras, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>IERSD, National Observatory of Athens, 15236 Palea Penteli, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Aix-Marseille University, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO) UMR 7294,
University de Toulon,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> CNRS, IRD, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Energy Environment and Water Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, Nicosia 1645, Cyprus</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Laboratory of Atmospheric Processes and their Impacts, School of Architecture,
Civil and Environmental Engineering, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jenny Pui Shan Wong (pwong37@gatech.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>7319</fpage><lpage>7334</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>5</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e202">Biomass burning is a major source of atmospheric brown
carbon (BrC), and through its absorption of UV/VIS radiation,
it can play an important role in the planetary radiative balance and
atmospheric photochemistry. The considerable uncertainty of BrC impacts is
associated with its poorly constrained sources, transformations, and
atmospheric lifetime. Here we report laboratory experiments that examined
changes in the optical properties of the water-soluble (WS) BrC fraction of
laboratory-generated biomass burning particles from hardwood
pyrolysis. Effects of direct UVB photolysis and OH oxidation in the aqueous
phase on molecular-weight-separated BrC were studied. Results indicated that the majority of
low-molecular-weight (MW)
BrC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Da) was rapidly photobleached by both direct photolysis and OH
oxidation on an atmospheric timescale of approximately 1 h. High MW BrC
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Da) underwent initial photoenhancement up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h,
followed by slow photobleaching over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h. The laboratory experiments
were supported by observations from ambient BrC samples that were collected
during the fire seasons in Greece. These samples, containing freshly emitted
to aged biomass burning aerosol, were analyzed for both water- and
methanol-soluble BrC. Consistent with the laboratory experiments, high-MW BrC
dominated the total light absorption at 365 nm for both methanol and
water-soluble fractions of ambient samples with atmospheric transport times
of 1 to 68 h. These ambient observations indicate that overall,
biomass burning BrC across all molecular weights has an atmospheric lifetime
of 15 to 28 h, consistent with estimates from previous field studies –
although the BrC associated with the high-MW fraction remains relatively
stable and is responsible for light absorption properties of BrC throughout most of its atmospheric lifetime. For
ambient samples of aged (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h) biomass burning emissions, poor linear
correlations were found between light absorptivity and levoglucosan,
consistent with other studies suggesting a short atmospheric lifetime for
levoglucosan. However, a much stronger correlation between light absorptivity
and total hydrous sugars was observed, suggesting that they may serve as more
robust tracers for aged biomass burning emissions. Overall, the results from
this study suggest that robust model estimates of BrC radiative impacts
require consideration of the atmospheric aging of BrC and the stability of
high-MW BrC.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page7320?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e266">Brown carbon (BrC), the fraction of organic aerosol that absorbs solar
radiation in the UV and near-visible wavelengths, may potentially be an
important climate warmer, with estimated direct radiative forcing that varies
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., Park et al., 2010; Feng et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014;
Saleh et al., 2015; Jo et al., 2016) and a vertical distribution that can
be distinctly different from black carbon and other climate warmers
(Zhang et al., 2017). In addition to climate
impacts, the importance of UV solar radiation for photochemistry also
implies that BrC may affect atmospheric chemistry (He and Carmichael, 1999; Mok et
al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e301">Current knowledge on the sources, sinks, optical properties, and atmospheric
lifetime of BrC is limited. Among the sources of BrC, combustion of biomass
(Andreae and Gelencsér, 2006; Alexander et al., 2008; Hecobian et al.,
2010; Kirchstetter and Thatcher, 2012; Saleh et al., 2014; Lack et al., 2012)
and fossil fuels (Bond, 2001; Zhang et al., 2011) is thought to dominate; for
example, a 1-year period in the
southeastern USA, 50 % of BrC was attributed to biomass burning (Hecobian
et al., 2010). Secondary processes that often involve carbonyls and
nitrogen-containing compounds can also generate BrC in the atmosphere
(Laskin et al., 2015). Molecular identification of the
chromophores is a challenging task, as there may be a multitude of light-absorbing compounds. It remains unclear whether BrC is comprised of low
concentrations of strongly absorbing chromophores or a large number of
weakly absorbing chromophores in a complex organic matrix. To date, several
classes of compounds have been identified as BrC in biomass burning organic
aerosols (BBOA), such as nitroaromatic compounds (Desyaterik
et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Mohr et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2016),
humic-like substances (HULIS; Dinar
et al., 2008; Hoffer et al., 2006; Fan et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017), and
other high-molecular-weight substances (i.e., compounds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Da; Di
Lorenzo and Young, 2016; Di Lorenzo et al., 2017; Wong et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e314">Studies have suggested that following the emission or formation of
biomass burning BrC, their optical properties can be transformed by
atmospheric aging processes. Laboratory studies, for both model compounds and
complex mixtures of biomass burning BrC, suggested that initial stages of
photochemical aging can increase light absorption (“photoenhancement”),
followed by a subsequent decrease (“photobleaching”; Saleh et al., 2013;
Zhong and Jang, 2014; Zhao et al., 2015; Sumlin et al., 2017; Hems and
Abbatt, 2018). The atmospheric lifetime was constrained only for
biomass burning BrC from nitrophenols, where photobleaching by aqueous OH
oxidation in fog or cloud droplets was found to be its dominant atmospheric
loss mechanism, with an estimated atmospheric lifetime of a few hours (Zhao
et al., 2015; Hems and Abbatt, 2018). Field observations from wildfire
emissions in the northwestern USA and the Amazon have suggested that most
biomass burning BrC chromophores have an atmospheric lifetime in the range of
13 to 30 h (Forrister et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016). It was observed,
however, that the majority of light absorption in aged biomass burning BrC
(approximately 2 d of atmospheric transport) from wildfire emissions in
northeastern Canada was associated with compounds of 500 Da and larger (Di
Lorenzo and Young, 2016; Di Lorenzo et al., 2017). Altogether, this indicated
that a fraction of high-molecular-weight BrC is recalcitrant to
atmospheric aging processes. While
there is field evidence that aqueous-phase chemistry can transform the
optical properties of BrC emitted from biomass burning (Gilardoni et al.,
2016; Zhang et al., 2017), the specific aging processes leading to these
field observations remain unknown. In addition, these contrasting laboratory
and field observational constraints on the atmospheric lifetime of BrC are
much shorter than the assumed atmospheric lifetime of BrC (approximately
4 d) utilized in models to estimate its impacts on aerosol direct radiative
forcing (Jo et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e317">Along with constraining the atmospheric lifetime of biomass burning BrC,
accurate estimates of the contribution of biomass burning to global BrC are
also critical for robust assessments of its climatic impacts. Levoglucosan,
an anhydrous sugar emitted during biomass pyrolysis, is a molecular tracer
widely used to estimate the contribution of biomass burning to ambient
organic aerosol concentrations, as it was historically thought to be
chemically inert (Simoneit et al., 1999). Yet a growing number of studies
have demonstrated that levoglucosan is subject to significant atmospheric
loss, with an estimated atmospheric lifetime of 0.7 to 2.2 d (Hennigan et
al., 2010; Hoffmann et al., 2010; Kessler et al., 2010; May et al., 2012;
Slade and Knopf, 2014; Zhao et al., 2014; Sang et al., 2016). Given that the
average lifetime of atmospheric aerosols with respect to deposition is
considerably longer, and recent
field observations have demonstrated that aged BBOA had negligible
concentrations of levoglucosan or of its aerosol mass spectrometric
signatures (Bougiatioti et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2017; Theodosi et al.,
2018), these results suggest that levoglucosan or its mass spectral fragments
cannot be used to estimate BrC levels in aged biomass burning emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d).</p>
      <p id="d1e331">In this study, we systematically investigated the photochemical aging of the
molecular-weight-separated water-soluble (WS) BrC fraction of biomass burning particles produced by wood pyrolysis, by both aqueous OH oxidation
and photolysis by UVB radiation. We build upon earlier laboratory
experiments that examined the aging effects of photolysis by UVA radiation
(Wong et al., 2017) to establish a more complete understanding of the
effects of different photochemical aging processes. Based on the
photobleaching rates determined from these laboratory experiments, we
estimated the dominant photochemical pathway leading to the loss of biomass burning BrC in the atmosphere. To provide additional field evidence of the
impacts of atmospheric aging on biomass burning BrC, and to further assess
the<?pagebreak page7321?> atmospheric stability of high-molecular-weight BrC, the light
absorptivity of the molecular-weight-separated water- and methanol-soluble
BrC fraction from ambient samples of different atmospheric ages was
determined. Finally, from these ambient samples, we assessed the use of
levoglucosan and other proposed biomass burning species as robust tracers
for aged biomass burning aerosol and BrC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Laboratory experiments</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>Preparation of WS BrC</title>
      <p id="d1e356">Wood smoke BrC was generated in the laboratory using the method described in
Wong et al. (2017). Briefly, a small piece of
dry cherry hardwood (5–10 g), placed on the bottom of a cylindrical
electronically heated combustor, was pyrolyzed under an oxygen-free
atmosphere at 210 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to represent BrC emitted from smoldering
combustion (Andreae and Gelencsér, 2006; Chen and Bond, 2010). The
resulting smoke stream was subsequently diluted with filtered air by a factor
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the BBOA was collected on polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)
filters (47 mm, 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size, Pall Corporation) at
6 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 100 min and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Prior to each
laboratory experiment, water-soluble (WS) BrC was extracted from the filter by adding 15 mL of purified water
(18.2 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) to a sealed glass vial and sonicated for 60 min. The
extract was filtered using a 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m PTFE syringe filter (Fisher) to
remove any insoluble materials that may damage the chromatography column or
plug the waveguide used to characterize BrC properties (Sect. 2.1.4). Given
that the WS BrC is dissolved in bulk aqueous solutions, the experimental
conditions for the photochemical aging experiments, such as BrC
concentrations and viscosity, most likely represent the aging of WS wood
smoke BrC in fog and/or cloud droplets. For these laboratory studies, we only
focused on the aging of WS BrC, as results from our previous work indicated
that the majority of the light absorption of laboratory-generated BrC from
wood smoke was contributed by the WS fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and that the
trends in the evolution of light absorption of water-insoluble (i.e.,
methanol extracted) BrC due to photochemical aging are similar to those of
the WS fraction (Wong et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>Photolysis of WS BrC by UVB lights</title>
      <p id="d1e451">Experiments examining the photolytic aging of WS BrC by UVB lights follow
the same experimental procedure for UVA photolysis as described in Wong et
al. (2017). All photochemical aging experiments were conducted in a
photoreactor, with a slowly rotating vial rack (40 rpm) placed in the center
and surrounded by 16 UVB lamps (Desert Series 50 T8, Zilla). With all UV
lamps on, continuous ventilation by two fans maintained the temperature
inside the photoreactor at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The photon fluxes
inside the photoreactor from UVB lamps were determined by chemical
actinometry using 2-nitrobenzaldehyde (see Wong et al., 2017, for
experimental details). The wavelength-dependent photon fluxes from both UVA
and UVB lamps are shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement, where the actinic flux at solar noon
is provided for comparison. Most of the radiation fell in the range of 300–400 nm,
with a maximum at 355 and 310 nm for UVA and UVB lamps,
respectively. Note that while both UVB and UVA lamps have comparably similar
photon fluxes for wavelengths lower than 320 nm, the UVA lamps have a
correspondingly much higher photon flux at higher wavelengths. These
spectral differences allowed for investigating the wavelength dependence of
BrC aging by photolysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e475">For each photolysis experiment, multiple pre-cleaned 2 mL borosilicate
glass vials (sealed with Teflon-lined caps), each containing 1mL of the WS
BrC extract solution, were placed on the rotating vial rack inside the
photoreactor. Each extract solution was diluted by 5 % (with purified
water) such that the final concentration of WS BrC used in the photolysis
experiments is identical to that used in the aqueous OH oxidation
experiments, where the WS BrC concentration was diluted by 5 % from the
addition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sect. 2.1.3). The vials were illuminated by
UVB lights for up to approximately 100 h, where at different
illumination times, one vial was removed for offline analysis (described in
Sect. 2.1.4). Control experiments were conducted; no changes in WS BrC
properties were observed when the vials containing the extract were
completely covered by aluminium foil, where they were only exposed to the
elevated temperatures inside the photoreactor and not UVB radiation.
Photolysis experiments were repeated at least 3 times to ensure
reproducibility.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>2.1.3</label><title>Aqueous OH oxidation of WS BrC</title>
      <p id="d1e502">Experiments for aqueous OH oxidation were conducted in the same experimental
setup used in the photolysis experiments. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (30 %, Sigma
Aldrich) was added to the WS BrC extract solution (final concentration of
1.5 mM) as a photolytic source of the OH radical upon irradiation with UVB
lights (up to 18 h). Dark control experiments were conducted to confirm
that the dark reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with WS BrC did not change its
optical or molecular-weight properties. Similar to photolysis
experiments, at different illumination times, one vial was removed for
offline analysis. The OH oxidation experiments were repeated 3 times to
ensure reproducibility.</p>
      <p id="d1e537">The steady-state OH concentration ([OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in these photochemical
oxidation experiments was determined in order to estimate the atmospheric
lifetime of WS BrC with respect to aqueous OH oxidation. This was performed
by monitoring the formation of para-hydroxybenzoic acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-HBA) from the
reaction of OH with benzoate, a commonly employed OH scavenger (Zhou and
Mopper, 1990; Anastasio and McGregor, 2001; Badali et al., 2015). The OH
quantification<?pagebreak page7322?> experiments are described in detail in Sect. S1. Briefly,
sodium benzoate (0.1–1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M) was added to WS wood smoke BrC
extract solution with and without 1.5 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The resulting
solutions were illuminated for up to 18 h, where at different times, a
sample vial was removed to determine the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-HBA, using
HPLC-UV/VIS absorption. The yield of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-HBA from the reaction of OH with
benzoate (0.17) was used to convert the formation rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-HBA to an OH
production rate from which the [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-HBA does
not absorb radiation in the same wavelength regions as BrC, but given that
other products formed from the reaction of OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> benzoate do, in order to
avoid measurement interference from these products, the OH quantification
experiments were conducted separately from the experiments where the effects
of OH oxidation on BrC properties were examined. In these experiments, the
relationship between OH photo-production and benzoate concentration was
determined in order to quantify [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the aqueous OH
oxidation experiments where the BrC properties were monitored (i.e., no
benzoate as an added OH scavenger). Figure S2 shows
the relationship between the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-HBA formation rate and concentration of added benzoate, which was used to
estimate the [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> when [benzoate] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 (i.e., experiments
where light absorptivity of BrC was monitored).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>2.1.4</label><title>Offline WS BrC measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e669">Following the removal of each sample vial from the photoreactor, the BrC
solutions were divided to determine various BrC chemical and optical
properties using the same procedures outlined in Wong et al. (2017). Briefly,
changes in the water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) concentration due to
photochemical aging were monitored using a Sievers Total Organic
Carbon (TOC) Analyzer (Model 900, GE
Analytical Instruments). For these measurements, the WS BrC samples were
diluted by a factor of 250 to ensure that the WSOC concentrations were in the
linear range of the instrument, which was routinely calibrated using
solutions of dissolved sucrose of known concentrations. Prior to
photochemical aging, each sample vial contained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1400</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">178</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb of WSOC.
The light absorptivity of WS BrC of all molecular weights (i.e., bulk WS BrC)
was monitored using the 250<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> diluted WS BrC solutions and an
absorption spectrometer consisting of a liquid waveguide capillary (2.5 m
optical path length, World Precision), a deuterium tungsten halogen light
source (DT-Mini, Ocean Optics), and a light detector (USB4000, Ocean Optics)
that can continuously monitor all wavelengths between 230 and 800 nm. The
molecular-weight distributions of WS BrC were determined using size-exclusion
chromatography (SEC), which separates analyte molecules due to differences in
the extent of permeation into the column packing material, where larger
molecules elute earlier than smaller molecules due to weaker interactions
(Strigel et al., 2009). The technique was operated using high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC; GP40 Dionex), equipped with an SEC column
(Polysep GFC P-3000, Phenomenex) that was operated in isocratic mode using a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixture of water and methanol with 25 mM ammonium acetate as
the mobile phase at 1 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
near-UV/VIS absorbance of the
molecular-weight-separated BrC compounds was monitored using an absorbance
spectrometer that was coupled in line with the SEC system. The spectrometer
consisted of the same components as the one used for bulk WS BrC
measurements, except a liquid waveguide capillary with a 1 m optical path
length (World Precision) and a different model of the deuterium tungsten
halogen light source (DT-Mini-2B, Ocean Optics) were used. This SEC approach
was routinely calibrated using standards of known molecular weights from
which the calibration methodology and the relationship between molecular
weights and elution volumes were previously described (Wong et al., 2017). We
note that the molecular weights reported using this SEC approach are only
approximate, as the accuracy of the molecular-weight calibration depends on
whether the molecular densities of calibration standards are representative
of those of WS BrC molecules, which are currently unknown. Additionally,
hydrophobic interactions of the sample molecules with the SEC column may
affect the elution times (e.g., hydrophobic species elute at a later time
compared to hydrophilic species of similar molecular weights;
Sarah A. Styler, personal communication, 28 February 2019). The absorbance of
the different molecular-weight fractions was determined by integrating the
absorbance of a specific wavelength over the period of elution that
corresponds to the molecular-weight fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Since the coupling of the chromatographic technique to
UV/VIS absorption measurements
leads to the dilution of the BrC sample due to the use of the mobile phase,
the absorbance of the molecular-weight-separated BrC
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is related to absorbance of the injected BrC by
accounting for the mobile phase flow
rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the volume of the injected BrC sample (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M48" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The measured light absorption for both bulk WS BrC were normalized by the
WSOC concentration of the BrC extract to represent the light absorption per
water-soluble organic carbon or the mass absorption coefficient (MAC) of the
WS BrC (the calculation method described in Wong et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Field observations in Crete</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Sampling site and identification of biomass burning events</title>
      <p id="d1e846">Filter samples containing ambient BrC from biomass burning emissions were
collected during the fire season (July to October) of 2016 and 2017 at the
Heraklion station in Crete, Greece (Fig. 1). During the fire season,
persistent northerly winds (the Etesians) move air masses across the Aegean
Sea,<?pagebreak page7323?> where no further contribution from fire emissions can occur,
transporting biomass burning emissions from continental eastern
Europe towards the sampling site. The fire season in 2017 was more intense compared
to 2016, due to extended droughts and high temperatures.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e851">Locations of biomass burning events relevant to the current study,
as detected by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and
the Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRES;
<uri>https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/map/</uri>, last access: 26 June 2018)
during the fire seasons in 2016 (red circles) and 2017 (blue circles). The
corresponding MODIS-measured fire radiative power (FRP; in megawatts) is
represented by the size of the circle markers and is provided as a rough
proxy of biomass burning emission rate (Wooster, 2002). Wildfires with FRP
less than 100 MW are not shown here. The location of the sampling site
(Heraklion, Crete, Greece) is indicated by the green cross.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=219.08622pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7319/2019/acp-19-7319-2019-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e863">Information on location and date of fire events, along with fire radiative
power, was obtained from the Fire Information for Resource Management System
(FIRES; <uri>https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/map/</uri>, last access:
26 June 2018), which was detected by the Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer (MODIS). Fire radiative power (in megawatts) was used as a
rough proxy for the biomass burning emission rate (Wooster, 2002). Fires
occurring 3 d prior to and within each filter sampling period, with fire
radiative power over 100 megawatts, were included in the analysis. Air mass
back trajectories were computed via HYSPLIT (Stein et al., 2015), using
archived Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) meteorology from which the
vertical velocity was determined. New trajectories were computed every hour
of each filter sampling interval (i.e., 22–24 h) for a total run time of
72 h. The information from FIRES and back trajectories was used together to identify filters samples
that were influenced by fire events (i.e., intersection of back trajectories
with the fire locations) and to estimate the corresponding atmospheric
transport time from the fire location to the sampling site (example is shown
in Fig. S3). This analysis approach was chosen to explore the stability of
biomass burning tracers; however, it does not account for variability in BrC
emissions from various fires. Out of the 65 field filter samples collected in
the 2016 and 2017 fire seasons (method discussed below), 24 biomass burning
filter samples of various atmospheric transport times were identified. We
focus our following analysis on these identified biomass burning events,
shown in Fig. 1. Note that several fires occurring near Athens and on the
island of Chios were burn events that persisted for multiple days.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Filter collection, extraction, and analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e877">Ambient BrC in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were collected on prebaked 8 in<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in quartz filters (2500QAT-UP,
Pall) using a high-volume (Hi-Vol) sampler (TISCH) for 22–24 h at a flow
rate of 1.4 and 2 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2016 and 2017, respectively.
Immediately after collection, the filter samples were wrapped in prebaked
aluminium foil and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until analysis. In addition,
multiple field blanks were collected during both fire seasons. Each quartz
filter sample was divided into portions for the determination of various
chemical properties. A 1.5 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> punch of the filter sample was analyzed
for organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon using an OCEC Analyzer (Sunset
Laboratory Inc.) using the NIOSH Method. Another 1.5 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> filter punch
was used to determine water-soluble components after extraction by
sonication. This included analysis of carbohydrates (levoglucosan, mannosan,
galactosan, glucose, mannose, and galactose) using high-performance anion
exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD;
ICS-3000, Dionex), which is described in Fourtzio et al. (2017). Using a
separate ion chromatographic system (Dionex), analysis of anions
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Br</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; CS12A column with CERS 500 suppressor) and cations
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; AS4A-SC column with AERS 500 suppressor) was also
conducted. Potassium associated with biomass burning (i.e.,
non-sea-salt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was
determined from the total potassium minus potassium associated with sea salt.
This was calculated using the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and a
standard seawater mass ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.0359 (Seinfeld
and Pandis, 1998).</p>
      <p id="d1e1139">Two 1.5 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> punches were placed in a pre-cleaned 2 mL borosilicate
glass vial, where either 1 mL of purified water (18.2 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or
methanol (MeOH; HPLC grade, Merck) was added and sonicated for 1 h to
extract either the WS- or MeOH-soluble (i.e., water-soluble and
water-insoluble) BrC, respectively. Note that the extractions of MeOH BrC and
WS BrC were done on separate sections of the same filter. Each extract was
then filtered using a new 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m PTFE syringe filter (Fisher). For
WS BrC, an aliquot of the filtered extract was used to determine the
water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) concentration using the TOC instrument
discussed in Sect. 2.1.4. For both WS and MeOH BrC filtered extracts, aliquots of the solutions were used to
determine the<?pagebreak page7324?> molecular-weight distributions of BrC using the HPLC-SEC-UV/VIS absorption technique
discussed in Sect. 2.1.4. Additionally, an aliquot of both filtered solutions
was used to measure the bulk light absorption properties (i.e., not
molecular-weight-separated) of WS and MeOH BrC, using the absorption
spectrometer described in Sect. 2.1.4. The MAC values of the WS- and MeOH-soluble BrC were determined through normalizing by the WSOC concentration (WS BrC
and WSOC) or OC concentrations (MeOH BrC and OC), as determined using the TOC
and OCEC analyzers, respectively. Note that for both TOC and bulk UV/VIS
absorption measurements, the filtered extracts were diluted by a factor of 20
to ensure that the measured properties were in the linear response range of
the instruments. The field filter blanks were analyzed using the same
methodology as the BBOA filters, and all measurements were blank subtracted.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Laboratory experiments on WS BrC</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Bulk WS BrC</title>
      <p id="d1e1193">Upon illumination by UVB lights, losses in WSOC were observed for both
direct UVB photolysis and UVB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> experiments (Fig. 2a),
with the majority of this loss occurring following 20 h of
illumination. The effects of aqueous OH oxidation is taken to be the
difference between the UVB and UVB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> experiments, assuming
that the effects of direct UVB photolysis are identical in both types of
experiments (i.e., the addition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> did not significantly
alter the rate of direct photolysis). Here, aqueous OH oxidation did not
lead to additional loss of WSOC, indicating that the loss of WSOC is only
due to direct UVB photolysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1260">Effects of UVB photolysis (blue circles) and aqueous OH oxidation
(green triangles) on <bold>(a)</bold> changes in WSOC <bold>(b)</bold> WSOC mass normalized absorption
coefficient (MAC) at 365 nm (open markers) and 400 nm (filled markers). The
shaded areas represent the variability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in multiple
experiments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7319/2019/acp-19-7319-2019-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1299">The effects of photochemical aging on the light absorption per water-soluble
organic carbon (mass absorption coefficient, MAC) of WS BrC are shown on
Fig. 2b. The calculation method for the MAC at 365 and 400 nm is discussed
previously in Wong et al. (2017). Note that these MAC values arise from
light absorption measurements of water-extracted BrC and not from suspended
BrC particles. The initial increase in MAC values was observed due to
photochemical aging, suggesting that the WS BrC undergoes photoenhancement,
leading to increased absorptivity of radiation at 365 and 400 nm, where the
increase in MAC values at 365 nm was more significant compared to that at
400 nm. Given that a loss in WSOC was observed during this photoenhancement
period, the increased MAC values may be driven by a loss in non-absorbing
WSOC and/or the formation of more absorbing WS BrC. This initial increase in
MAC values is likely driven by the formation of more absorbing WS BrC, as MAC
values increased by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while WSOC decreased only by a
factor of less than 1.1. During this initial period of photochemical aging
(up to 10 h), the changes in WSOC and MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are similar for UVB and
UVB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> experiments, suggesting that the aging by UVB led
to the observed photoenhancement. Following this period of initial
photoenhancement (up to 12 h), photobleaching (i.e., decrease in MAC values)
of WS BrC was observed. Here, a steeper slope for the decrease in MAC values
was observed for the UVB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the UVB
experiments, indicating that aqueous OH oxidation leads to enhanced decay in
light absorptivity and that while BrC is susceptible to both degradation due
to UVB photolysis and OH oxidation, certain BrC chromophores are more
reactive towards OH radicals. Previous studies that have examined the
photochemical aging of model biomass burning aromatic compounds
(Gelencsér et al., 2003; Chang and Thompson, 2010; Ofner et al., 2011;
Zhao et al., 2015; Smith et al., 2016; Hems and Abbatt, 2018), surrogate
mixtures of biomass burning BrC (Schnitzler and Abbatt, 2018), and BrC
emitted from the pyrolysis of various types of biomass (Zhao et al., 2015;
Wong et al., 2017; Sumlin et al., 2017) have similarly observed initial
photoenhancement, followed by photobleaching. It has been proposed that
polymerization and/or functionalization
of BrC leads to photoenhancement, while fragmentation results in
photobleaching.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>WS BrC separated by molecular weight</title>
      <?pagebreak page7325?><p id="d1e1376">Molecular-weight-separated BrC measurements by the SEC provide additional
insight into the reactivity of specific classes of WS BrC molecules leading
to the observed bulk photoenhancement and photobleaching. This is
illustrated in Figs. 3 and 4, where the Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements
were binned according to elution volumes where the high-molecular-weight
fraction (high MW) is defined as the sum of light absorptivity (Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for molecules with approximate molecular weights between 66 K Da and 401 Da
(i.e., elution volumes between 8 and 15 mL) and a low-molecular-weight
fraction (low MW) as the sum of light absorptivity (Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
molecules with approximate molecular weights of 400 Da and less (i.e.,
elution volumes higher than 15 mL). Prior to photochemical aging, fresh WS
BrC consisted of both high- and low-MW chromophores (Fig. 3a); however,
the contribution of these two fractions to light absorption changes when
photochemically aged. Figure 4 shows that both molecular-weight fractions
exhibit dynamic changes in their light absorptivity due to photochemical
aging, but to a different extent. High-MW WS BrC undergoes substantial initial
photoenhancement, followed by photobleaching. Low-MW WS BrC initially
decayed within the first hour; then there was an increase in light
absorptivity between 1 and 5 h of illumination time, followed by another
period of decreasing light absorptivity. The two separate phases of
decreasing light absorptivity suggest that low-MW WS BrC contains
chromophores of different photoreactivity. While the photobleaching of both
molecular-weight fractions appeared largely to follow pseudo-first-order
kinetics, the photoenhancement of high-MW WS BrC exhibited non-first-order
behavior. This may be due to the presence of chromophores with different
reactivity or because after the initial period of photoenhancement, further
aging does not lead to further increases in light absorptivity. For
simplicity, we treat this period of photoenhancement as pseudo-first-order.
In order to isolate the effects of OH oxidation on light absorptivity, we
follow the approach used by Zhao et al. (2015), where the pseudo-first-order
OH oxidation rate constants (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
photoenhancement and photobleaching were calculated by taking the difference
between the observed first-order growth and decay rate constants due to UVB
photolysis (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UVB</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and UVB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis
experiments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UVB</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). The second-order OH
oxidation rate constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be calculated from
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>):

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M96" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UVB</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UVB</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              We note that for Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the steady-state
concentration of OH radicals due to the photolysis of 1.5 mM of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., difference in [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between UVB photolysis and
UVB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis experiments). Additionally, for the high-MW
BrC, the photoenhancement and photobleaching rate constants were determined
by fitting first-order curves to the first 3 h and between 8 and 18 h
of absorption data at 365 nm (Fig. S4a). For the low-MW WS BrC, to
determine the decay rate constants of rapidly and slowly photobleached
chromophores, a first-order decay curve was fitted to 0 to 1 h and 8 to
18 h of absorption data at 365 nm, respectively (Fig. S4b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1665">Changes in <bold>(a)</bold> light absorption at a wavelength of 365 nm for
low-MW (triangles) and high-MW (circles) BrC fractions and <bold>(b)</bold> contribution
of high-MW fraction to total light absorbance at 365 nm in WS smoke BrC due
to UVB photolysis (blue) and aqueous OH oxidation (green). The shaded areas
represent the variability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in multiple experiments
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7319/2019/acp-19-7319-2019-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page7326?><p id="d1e1704">The resulting observed rate constants for photoenhancement and photobleaching
due to aqueous OH oxidation and UVB photolysis are shown in Table 1. Here,
the corresponding rate constants due to UVA photolysis, which were determined
by our previous work (Wong et al., 2017), are included for comparison.
Considering the reaction rate constants for low-MW WS BrC, its initial
photoenhancement was only observed in the presence of UVA radiation (i.e.,
enhanced photon flux at wavelengths above 310 nm), indicating that reactions
leading to the increased light absorptivity are wavelength dependent, whereas
photochemical aging of low-MW WS BrC by UVB photolysis and aqueous OH
oxidation only leads to photobleaching. As mentioned previously, low-MW WS
BrC of different reactivities with respect to photobleaching by aqueous OH
oxidation and UVB photolysis was observed: chromophores that were rapidly
photobleached due to exposure to UVB lights and chromophores that were slowly
photobleached by both aqueous OH oxidation and UVB radiation. We note that
the second-order rate constant for the decay in light absorptivity due to the
OH reaction with slowly photobleached low-MW WS chromophores determined in
this study [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] is comparable
to the range of the concentration-based rate constants for the OH reaction
with three different nitrophenols ([(3.7–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>], as reported by Hems and Abbatt, 2018). Given
that nitrophenols, a class of WS BrC that has been detected in BBOA in
significant concentrations (Mohr et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2016), have
molecular weights that are approximately less than 200 Da, it is reasonable
that they govern the OH reactivity of low-MW WS BrC (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Da)
observed in this study.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1810">Rate constants for the photoenhancement and photobleaching of
low- and high-MW WS BrC of wood smoke, with respect to photolysis (UVB and
UVA) and OH oxidation. Note that for UVB photolysis and OH oxidation, the
reported uncertainties represent the variability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in
multiple experiments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and that the rate constants for low-MW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and low-MW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> BrC photobleaching correspond to chromophores that were
rapidly and slowly photobleached, respectively. Rate constants for UVA
photolysis were previously reported in Wong et al. (2017).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fraction<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (M s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UVB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UVA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BrC photoenhancement</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low MW</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High MW</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BrC photobleaching</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low MW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low MW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High MW</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1855"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> High-MW BrC is defined as the sum of light
absorptivity (Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for molecules with approximate molecular weights
between 66 kDa and 401 Da (i.e., SEC
elution volumes between 8 and 15 mL), and low-molecular-weight fraction (low
MW) is defined as the sum of light absorptivity for molecules with
approximate molecular weights of 400 Da and less (i.e., SEC elution volumes
higher than 15 mL).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2307">For high-MW WS BrC, no differences in the evolution of their light
absorption were observed between the two different photochemical aging
experiments (Fig. 4a). This suggests that their initial photoenhancement
(up to 15 h) and subsequent photobleaching were only due to exposure
to UVB radiation. Given that the photoenhancement and photobleaching rates
for high-MW WS chromophores due to UVB and UVA exposure (Table 1) are
similar, and that both UVB and UVA lamps have similar photon fluxes for
wavelengths lower than 310 nm, our results suggest that most of the
photochemical aging was initiated by UVB radiation. Owing to its rapid
photoenhancement and slow photobleaching, the contribution of high-MW WS BrC
to total light absorptivity increases throughout photochemical aging, from
20 % when the WS BrC was freshly emitted up to 80 % after 100 h of
UV exposure (Fig. 4b). Given that the integrated UVB photon flux in these
laboratory experiments is roughly 92 % of the sun at solar noon (i.e., 1 h of UVB exposure in laboratory experiments is equivalent to 0.92 h
in the atmosphere), these results further support earlier field observations
where the light absorptivity of aged (up to 40 h) ambient biomass burning WS BrC was attributed to molecules larger than 500 Da (Di Lorenzo and
Young, 2016; Di Lorenzo et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e2310">Changes in the absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) throughout UVB
photolysis and OH oxidation were also determined from linear regression fits
to log Abs vs. log <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S5) in the wavelength ranges of
320–500 nm for both high and low-MW fractions of WS BrC molecules and
320–420 nm for high-MW BrC. Changes in AAE values that were determined from
different wavelength ranges can provide insight into the effects of
photochemical aging on the light absorption spectral properties of BrC in
addition to monitoring the MAC values at different wavelengths. Shown in
Fig. 5, prior to any photochemical aging, different AAE values for low-MW
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and high-MW (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) WS BrC were observed, indicating
that the low-MW WS BrC has a much stronger spectral dependence than that of
high-MW WS BrC. We speculate that the lower AAE values of high-MW WS BrC are
due to the highly conjugated nature of these molecules, as previous
observations by Hopkins et al. (2007) have indicated that biomass burning BrC
with lower AAE values has a higher extent of carbon sp<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> hybridization
compared to those with higher AAE values. As the low- and high-MW WS BrC
was photochemically aged, changes in
its AAE values were observed. For low-MW WS BrC, AAE values decreased due to
decreased light absorptivity at lower wavelengths. For high-MW WS BrC,
comparison of the temporal evolution of the AAE values determined in both
wavelength ranges (Fig. 5b and c) shows that during initial photoenhancement
(up to 15 h), a slight decrease in the AAE was only observed from
320–420 nm, suggesting that photoenhancement reactions, such as
functionalization and polymerization, enhance the absorptivity of light of
wavelengths only up to 500 nm. Following this period of initial
photoenhancement, increasing AAE values were observed as the high-MW WS BrC
was photobleached, where the increase in AAE values for 320–500 nm was more
rapid compared to 320–420 nm, indicating a blue shift in the absorption
spectra of high-MW WS BrC due to decreasing absorption in the 420 to 500 nm
range. Collectively, the differences in evolution of AAE values further
support that the reactivity and aging mechanisms of BrC are dependent on
their molecular weight.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2355">Evolution of AAE due to UVB photolysis (blue) and aqueous OH
oxidation (green) for <bold>(a)</bold> low-molecular-weight BrC (triangles), <bold>(b)</bold> high-molecular-weight BrC (circles) from 320–500 nm, and
<bold>(c)</bold> high-molecular-weight BrC from 320–420 nm. The shaded areas represent the variability
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in multiple experiments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7319/2019/acp-19-7319-2019-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Atmospheric fate of WS BrC from biomass burning</title>
      <p id="d1e2405">These experimentally determined rate constants indicate that ambient WS BrC
is transformed within a day in the atmosphere (Table S1; calculation method
discussed in Sect. S2), and considering that the average atmospheric lifetime
of particles with respect to deposition is approximately 1 week, our
laboratory results indicate that photochemical aging has an important effect
on the optical properties of BBOA. For low-MW WS BrC, laboratory results
suggest that there are two groups with different reactivities. A highly
photolabile fraction of low-MW WS BrC is photobleached in the atmosphere,
with UVB photolysis being their dominant atmospheric fate, with an estimated
atmospheric lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h. A second, less reactive fraction of
low-MW WS BrC has an estimated atmospheric lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h, with
aqueous OH oxidation representing its dominant atmospheric loss mechanism.
However, this less reactive low-MW WS BrC does not significantly contribute
to total light<?pagebreak page7327?> absorptivity, as its decay only increased the fractional
contribution of high MW to total
light absorptivity for WS BrC by 0.2 (Fig. 4b). Conversely, for high-MW WS
BrC, following its initial photoenhancement, where color formation occurs
over a timescale of a few hours, this BrC is photobleached by UVB photolysis,
with an atmospheric lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h.</p>
      <p id="d1e2444">While these estimated atmospheric lifetimes suggest that the majority of BrC
is photobleached in the atmosphere, it is important to note that for high-MW
WS BrC, the rate of decreasing light absorptivity slows down with time,
where after 100 h of photochemical aging in the laboratory,
approximately 20 % of the initial light absorptivity remained (Fig. 4a).
These observations suggest that a fraction of high-MW WS BrC has an
atmospheric lifetime longer than 11 h and is more persistent. It is
critical to note that these atmospheric lifetimes were estimated from
laboratory-generated BrC from one biomass fuel type, under a specific burn
condition. In addition, the estimated atmospheric lifetimes were calculated
assuming continuous exposure to solar radiation with an actinic flux
corresponding to that at solar noon and [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M,
which represent the daily peak solar photon flux and the upper range of OH
concentrations in cloud droplets (Herrmann
et al., 2010; Arakaki et al., 2013), thus likely representing the lower
range of BrC atmospheric lifetimes. We also stress that there are
uncertainties in these estimates, as they assume that the photolysis
quantum yield of BrC is wavelength independent. Also, estimates of
[OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the condensed phase, which includes aqueous particles,
cloud, and fog droplets, range over several orders of magnitude (Arakaki et al., 2013; Ervens, 2015). Under
lower levels of [OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which better represent the oxidant
concentrations of aerosol particles, photolysis by UVB becomes the dominant
atmospheric loss mechanism for all molecular-weight fractions of BrC.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Field observations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Bulk- and molecular-weight-separated WS and MeOH BrC</title>
      <p id="d1e2508">Investigating the impacts of atmospheric aging on biomass burning BrC in the
field and comparison to laboratory observations represent the other primary
goals of this study. Both WS and MeOH (i.e., water-soluble and insoluble)
BrC were analyzed for the field samples to assess the atmospheric evolution
of BrC from ambient BBOA. Evolution of various properties of WS and MeOH BrC
as a function of atmospheric transport time is shown in Fig. 6, where all
individuals measurements (filled points), along with binned (every 5 h)
median values (open points), are presented. We first discuss the bulk
measurements (Fig. 6a–d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2513"><bold>(a)</bold> Organic carbon (OC) or water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC)
concentrations, <bold>(b)</bold> light absorption at 365 nm, <bold>(c)</bold> mass absorption
coefficients at 365 nm, <bold>(d)</bold> AAE (in the wavelength range of 320–500 nm), and
<bold>(e)</bold> fractional contribution of high-molecular-weight fractions to total light
absorption as a function of atmospheric transport time, for MeOH (black
circles) and water (red triangles) extractable portion of the ambient
filters collected on the island of Crete, Greece, during the 2016 and 2017 fire
seasons. The filled points are individual filter measurements, the open
points represent the binned median values, and the associated error bars
represent the interquartile range.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7319/2019/acp-19-7319-2019-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2536">Considering field samples with atmospheric transport times up to 10 h, an
increase in bulk (i.e., not molecular-weight-separated)
Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6b) was observed for both MeOH and WS BrC, while
a significant increase in MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Fig. 6c) was only observed for
the water-soluble portion. This is due to the more significant loss of WSOC
compared to OC (Fig. 6a), suggesting that the non-absorbing water-soluble
compounds in biomass burning are more rapidly lost in the atmosphere due to
aging. For field samples with atmospheric transport times longer than 10 h,
lower values of WSOC, OC and
Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for MeOH and WS BrC were observed, suggesting that
atmospheric aging processes led to a decay in the mass and light absorptivity
of biomass burning BrC. These ambient observations of bulk WS BrC corroborate
our earlier laboratory results, suggesting that atmospheric photochemical
aging processes increase MAC values for WS BrC, at least in fresher
biomass burning plumes, followed by photobleaching with further atmospheric
aging. Despite the considerable scatter, the field data indicate that the
light absorptivity of bulk MeOH BrC decreased at a slower rate compared to
bulk WS BrC (see Fig. S6 for exponential decay). From these<?pagebreak page7328?> exponential
decays in bulk MeOH and WS ambient BrC, the atmospheric lifetime of bulk MeOH
and WS BrC is estimated to be between 15–28 h. We note that within the
variability in all ambient observations, the MAC values for MeOH BrC did not
change significantly. Lastly, from these bulk measurements, AAE values
(Fig. 6d) did not change significantly throughout atmospheric transport,
suggesting that aging processes do not greatly affect the wavelength
dependence of BrC light absorption.</p>
      <p id="d1e2572">Molecular-weight-separated BrC measurements from the corresponding field
samples (Fig. 6e) indicate that even for fresh biomass burning emissions
(i.e., 1 h of atmospheric transport time), high-MW MeOH and WS BrC
dominated the total light absorption at 365 nm. This is also highlighted in
Fig. 3b, which shows the molecular-weight-separated absorption spectra of
fresh ambient biomass burning WS BrC. Given that it remains unclear to which
extent fuel type and burn conditions affect the molecular-weight
distribution of BrC chromophores, the observed low contribution of low-MW
BrC to total light absorptivity may either be due to their rapid
photochemical removal in the atmosphere, as demonstrated from our laboratory
experiments, or its low emission rate. In addition, the average
contribution of high-MW chromophores to total BrC light absorptivity is
lower compared to WS BrC, suggesting that some water-insoluble BrC is
low-MW compounds.</p>
      <p id="d1e2575">Given that the atmospheric lifetime of ambient BrC from bulk measurements
was estimated to be between 15–19 h, and that high-MW chromophores
contributed on average 75–87 % of total light absorptivity for MeOH and WS
ambient BrC, the atmospheric lifetime of ambient high-MW MeOH and WS BrC is
likely to be at least 15–28 h as well, which is longer than the
estimates from laboratory results for the WS BrC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h,
Table S1). We speculate that the difference in
atmospheric lifetime may be due to several reasons. Firstly, the laboratory-constrained atmospheric lifetime represents BrC emitted from the combustion
of one biomass fuel type under smoldering conditions, which may not
represent ambient fire conditions, as the light absorption properties of BrC
have been observed to be dependent on field and burn conditions (Chen
and Bond, 2010). Secondly, the laboratory-constrained atmospheric lifetime
represents high-MW WS BrC that was cloud processed, which may not apply for
the ambient samples. Thirdly, high-MW WS BrC was continuously exposed to UV
radiation in the laboratory, where this does not represent the diurnal cycle
of solar radiation that ambient BrC is exposed to. This is particularly important
for high-MW WS BrC emitted throughout the night, where its atmospheric
lifetime will be longer relative to that emitted during the day, during
which the high-MW WS BrC is photobleached. Fourthly, the lifetime obtained
from laboratory results was based on the aging of BrC dissolved in bulk
solutions, where parameters that may affect the reactivity of ambient BrC in
suspended particles, such as the aerosol phase state, solute concentrations, and
viscosity, were not accounted for. Similarly, ambient aerosols containing
biomass burning BrC are likely to be more chemically complex than those
studied in the laboratory (e.g., complex emissions from the combustion of
multiple types of biomass), where the presence of other organic compounds
that are more reactive may prolong the atmospheric lifetime of ambient
high-MW BrC. Lastly, there may be uncertainties associated with the
estimated atmospheric transport times for field samples, either due to
unaccounted contributions from (a) fires occurring more than 3 d prior to
filter collection (i.e., HYSPLIT runs times of 72 h were used), (b) small
fires with fire radiative power less than 100 MW, which were not
included in the current analysis, or (c) large fires that are not<?pagebreak page7329?> detected by
MODIS due to interference effects by thick smoke (Schroeder et al., 2008).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Chemical tracers for aged BrC from biomass burning</title>
      <p id="d1e2602">Previous studies have suggested the limitations of using levoglucosan and
non-sea-salt potassium (nss
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as chemical tracers for biomass burning, due to levoglucosan's
short atmospheric lifetime (e.g., Hennigan et al., 2010; May et al., 2012)
and emission of nss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by non-biomass burning sources (Urban et al.,
2012). More recently, Scaramboni et al. (2015) suggested the use of total
hydrous sugars (e.g., glucose) as an alternative tracer for biomass burning,
since the six-membered ring of the hydrated sugar molecule is potentially
more stable than the five-membered ring of levoglucosan. While biological
aerosols, such as microbes, are also a source of hydrated sugars
(Graham et al., 2002)
and may interfere with the signal from biomass burning, they are still useful
for examining correlations of these types of sugars with BrC under known
periods of biomass burning influence – especially given that high-MW BrC
from biomass burning appears to be a relatively stable aerosol component,
such that it can still be observed after significant periods of aging.</p>
      <p id="d1e2627">Focusing on the ambient filter samples impacted by biomass burning with
estimated atmospheric transport times over 10 h, we compare correlations
of levoglucosan, nss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and total hydrous sugars (defined as the sum
of glucose, mannose, and galactose mass concentration) to BrC to assess how
these compounds compare to BrC as a biomass burning tracer for aged BBOA.
Figure 7 shows their correlations to MeOH and WS BrC light absorption at 365 nm.
The detailed results of these regression analyses are provided in Table S2.
No correlation is seen between levoglucosan and aged MeOH and WS BrC
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), suggesting that levoglucosan is neither likely to be
representative of absorbing organic components nor serves as an effective
tracer of aged biomass burning. Given that we did not account for the fire
conditions in this analysis, the lack of correlation can also arise due to
varying relative emission ratios of BrC to levoglucosan, since it has been
previously observed that the relative emission ratios of OA to levoglucosan
and BrC to OA are not constant across burning conditions (i.e., smoldering
vs. flaming; Mazzoleni et al., 2007; Kalogridis et al., 2018). In comparison, both WS and total BrC
correlated moderately with nss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
consistent with previous field measurements of BBOA from the boreal forest
(Di Lorenzo et al., 2018) and Amazon
rainforest (Fuzzi et al., 2007). The moderate correlations may potentially be due to differences in
the dependence of potassium emissions and BrC light absorptivity on fire
conditions  (Chen and Bond, 2010; Lee et al., 2010). Additionally, contributions of nss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from other non-biomass burning sources, such as crustal material, could
also diminish the correlation with BrC if BrC is more specific to biomass
burning than nss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moderate to strong correlations between light
absorptivity of (MeOH and WS) BrC and total hydrous sugars were observed
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.56</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), suggesting that both classes of compounds
may serve as a robust tracer for aged biomass burning emissions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2730">Correlations of light absorption at 365 nm for the MeOH (black
circles) and water-soluble (red triangles) extractable portion of ambient
filter samples that were impacted by biomass burning to biomass burning
tracers: <bold>(a)</bold> levoglucosan, <bold>(b)</bold> nss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> total hydrous sugars. For
nss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, outliers (circled points) were excluded from the linear
regression analysis.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7319/2019/acp-19-7319-2019-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions and atmospheric implications</title>
      <p id="d1e2781">In this work, the effects of atmospheric aging on the light absorptivity of
molecular-weight-separated BrC were demonstrated in both controlled
laboratory experiments and ambient observations. The experimental conditions of the laboratory work focused
on the aging of WS BrC most likely
represent cloud processing of
BBOA. The ambient data included analysis of both WS and MeOH BrC. In the
laboratory experiments, photochemical aging processes led to significant
changes in light absorptivity and molecular-weight distributions of BrC,
where the reactivity of WS BrC was observed to be dependent on molecular
weight. We found that low-MW WS BrC undergoes rapid photobleaching in the
atmosphere on timescales of a few hours, whereas high-MW WS BrC likely
persists in the atmosphere for up to a few days. These laboratory results
bridge contrasting results from previous laboratory and field observations
which demonstrated that low-MW WS BrC, such
as nitrophenols, was rapidly photobleached within several hours, while
high-MW WS BrC is more stable. Ambient BrC was largely composed of WS BrC
species, and for both WS and MeOH BrC, their light absorptivity was dominated
by high-MW BrC, consistent with our laboratory results. Ambient BrC was
observed to undergo initial photoenhancement and total light absorption
dominated by high-MW BrC at 365 nm, even for fresh (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h of
atmospheric transport) biomass burning emissions, further supporting that
low-MW BrC is a short-lived component in atmospheric BBOA. Additionally,
observations of initial photoenhancement due to atmospheric aging in both
laboratory and field data support earlier ambient observations that secondary
production of BrC from biomass burning emissions can be an important source
of light-absorbing aerosol (Gilardoni et al., 2016), but only near fire
emissions. From the observed decay of bulk WS light absorptivity, we estimate
that ambient WS BrC have atmospheric lifetimes of approximately 15–28 h.
This range of the atmospheric lifetime likely corresponds to that of high-MW
BrC, as it contributed to over 75 % of total light absorptivity of
ambient BrC of ages up to 68 h. It is important to note that while this
estimated atmospheric lifetime likely represents a majority of high-MW BrC,
the slope of the light-absorptivity decay curve (Fig. S6) decreased with
atmospheric age, indicating that a fraction of the high-MW BrC is persistent
in the atmosphere for at least up to 68 h. Collectively, this
field-constrained lifetime of high-MW WS BrC is much larger than that
obtained from laboratory results, which may be due to differences in the
assumed versus ambient solar photon fluxes and oxidant<?pagebreak page7330?> concentrations. In
addition, aging processes not investigated in the laboratory study, such as
dilution, are also unlikely to result in more rapid removal of high-MW BrC
from the atmosphere. Although the volatility of high-MW BrC compounds remains
uncharacterized, given their large molecular weights and solubility in water,
we expect them to exhibit very low volatility, and they are unlikely to be lost from biomass burning particles via
volatilization during dilution with background air masses, which is
consistent with the observation that the majority of wood smoke BrC is
associated with extremely low-volatility organic compounds (Saleh et
al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e2794">Given that the average lifetime of particles in the atmosphere is
approximately 1 week with respect to deposition, the estimated atmospheric
lifetime of high-MW BrC continues to support earlier observations that it
can be a persistent component in atmospheric BBOA (Di
Lorenzo and Young, 2016; Wong et al., 2017; Di Lorenzo et al., 2017) and
therefore has a larger impact on aerosol direct radiative forcing compared
to low-MW BrC. The stability of high-MW BrC also suggests that it may be
ubiquitous in the atmosphere and potentially undergo intercontinental
transport. In addition, the estimated atmospheric lifetimes of ambient BrC
from this study (15–28 h) are consistent with those from previous field
studies of wildfires in the northwestern USA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 13–22 h;
Forrister et al., 2015) and in the Amazon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 22–45 h; Wang
et al., 2016). A recent modeling study indicated that incorporating a 1 d
photobleaching e-folding time, which was constrained from these previous
field studies, improved modeled-versus-observed BrC absorption and decreased
the estimated positive direct radiative effect of organic aerosols (Wang et al.,
2018). Further field data from different geographical regions are necessary
for assessing the estimated 1 d BrC atmospheric lifetime and improving
predictions of global BrC impacts.</p>
      <p id="d1e2811">Accurate predictions of the direct radiative forcing also require robust
estimates of the contribution of biomass burning to global BrC. Our field
observations suggest that total hydrous sugars and BrC may be more robust biomass burning markers compared to levoglucosan and nss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Other potential
sources of hydrous sugars should also be assessed to better constrain their
use as tracers for biomass burning.</p>
      <p id="d1e2825">From our field observations, the fractional contribution of high-MW MeOH and
WS BrC to total (all molecular weights) light absorptivity remained
relatively constant for up to 68 h of atmospheric aging, suggesting that
this class of compounds may also provide an alternative marker for aged
biomass burning emissions. However, it remains unclear whether fuel type and
burn conditions influence the emission, chemical composition, and reactivity
of high-MW BrC. For example, while the absorptivity of MeOH and WS BrC
generated from wood smoke has been shown to be dependent on pyrolysis
temperature and wood types (Chen and
Bond, 2010), it remains unclear whether this is due to differences in the
emission of low or high-MW BrC. Characterization of high-MW BrC generated
from other commonly burned biomass, such as agriculture crop residues and
biofuels used for residential heating under representative combustion and
fuel conditions (dry or wet), is warranted.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2832">SEC data can be requested from the corresponding author.
All other data are uploaded and available at
<uri>https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.896731</uri> (Wong et al., 2018).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e2838">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7319-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7319-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2847">JPSW, AN, and RJW designed the laboratory experiment. JPSW performed
laboratory experiments and analyzed the data. NM, KV, MK, JS, and AN designed
and organized the field campaign. MT and IT collected the field samples and
conducted the OC–EC and ion chromatography measurements. JS carried out the
carbohydrate analysis. JPSW conducted and analyzed light absorption and WSOC
measurements for field samples. JPSW wrote the paper, with contributions
from AN and RJW. All authors commented on the final paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2853">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2859">This work was supported by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) through
contract no. 00-10003806, by NASA through contract NNX14A974G, and by the
project PyroTRACH (ERC-2016-COG) funded from H2020-EU.1.1. – Excellent
Science – European Research Council (ERC), project ID 726165.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2864">This paper was edited by Manvendra K. Dubey and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alexander, D. T. L., Crozier, P. A., and Anderson, J. R.: Brown Carbon
Spheres in East Asian Outflow and Their Optical Properties, Science,
321, 833–836, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1155296</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Anastasio, C. and McGregor, K. G.: Chemistry of fog waters in California's
Central Valley: 1. In situ photoformation of hydroxyl radical and singlet
molecular oxygen, Atmos. Environ., 35, 1079–1089,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00281-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00281-8</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The
nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3131–3148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Arakaki, T., Anastasio, C., Kuroki, Y., Nakajima, H., Okada, K., Kotani, Y.,
Handa, D., Azechi, S., Kimura, T., Tsuhako, A., and Miyagi, Y.: A General
Scavenging Rate Constant for Reaction of Hydroxyl Radical with Organic
Carbon in Atmospheric Waters, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 8196–8203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es401927b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es401927b</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Badali, K. M., Zhou, S., Aljawhary, D., Antiñolo, M., Chen, W. J., Lok,
A., Mungall, E., Wong, J. P. S., Zhao, R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Formation of
hydroxyl radicals from photolysis of secondary organic aerosol material,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7831–7840, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7831-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7831-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C.: Spectral dependence of visible light absorption by carbonaceous
particles emitted from coal combustion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28,
4075–4078, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL013652</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bougiatioti, A., Stavroulas, I., Kostenidou, E., Zarmpas, P., Theodosi, C.,
Kouvarakis, G., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Nenes, A., Pandis,
S. N., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Processing of biomass-burning aerosol in the
eastern Mediterranean during summertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
4793–4807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4793-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-4793-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chang, J. L. and Thompson, J. E.: Characterization of colored products
formed during irradiation of aqueous solutions containing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and phenolic
compounds, Atmos. Environ., 44, 541–551,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.042</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood
combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Desyaterik, Y., Sun, Y., Shen, X., Lee, T., Wang, X., Wang, T., and Collett,
J. L.: Speciation of “brown” carbon in cloud water impacted by
agricultural biomass burning in eastern China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 7389–7399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50561</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Di Lorenzo, R. A. and Young, C. J.: Size separation method for absorption
characterization in brown carbon: Application to an aged biomass burning
sample, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2015GL066954, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066954" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL066954</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Di Lorenzo, R. A., Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Guo, H., Xu, L., Ng,
N. L., Weber, R. J., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E., and Young, C. J.:
Molecular-Size-Separated Brown Carbon Absorption for Biomass-Burning Aerosol
at Multiple Field Sites, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 3128–3137,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b06160</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Di Lorenzo, R. A., Place, B. K., VandenBoer, T. C., and Young, C. J.:
Composition of Size-Resolved Aged Boreal Fire Aerosols: Brown Carbon, Biomass
Burning Tracers, and Reduced Nitrogen, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 278–285,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00137" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00137</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Dinar, E., Riziq, A. A., Spindler, C., Erlick, C., Kiss, G., and Rudich, Y.:
The complex refractive index of atmospheric and model humic-like substances
(HULIS) retrieved by a cavity ring down aerosol spectrometer (CRD-AS),
Faraday Discuss., 137, 279–295, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B703111D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B703111D</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B.: Modeling the Processing of Aerosol and Trace Gases in Clouds and
Fogs, Chem. Rev., 115, 4157–4198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5005887</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Fan, X., Wei, S., Zhu, M., Song, J., and Peng, P.: Comprehensive
characterization of humic-like substances in smoke PM2.5 emitted from the
combustion of biomass materials and fossil fuels, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
16, 13321–13340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13321-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13321-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant
atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
8607–8621, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Forrister, H., Liu, J., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., Ziemba, L., Thornhill, K. L.,
Anderson, B., Diskin, G., Perring, A. E., Schwarz, J. P., Campuzano-Jost,
P., Day, D. A., Palm, B. B., Jimenez, J. L., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.:
Evolution of brown carbon in wildfire plumes: Brown Carbon in Biomass
Burning Plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4623–4630,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063897" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL063897</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Fourtziou, L., Liakakou, E., Stavroulas, I., Theodosi, C., Zarmpas, P.,
Psiloglou, B., Sciare, J., Maggos, T., Bairachtari, K., Bougiatioti, A.,
Gerasopoulos, E., Sarda-Estève, R., Bonnaire, N., and Mihalopoulos, N.:
Multi-tracer approach to characterize domestic wood burning in Athens
(Greece) during wintertime, Atmos. Environ., 148, 89–101,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.011</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Fuzzi, S., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Cavalli, F., Emblico, L., Mircea,
M., Andreae, M. O., Trebs, I., Hoffer, A., Guyon, P., Artaxo, P., Rizzo, L.
V., Lara, L. L., Pauliquevis, T., Maenhaut, W., Raes, N., Chi, X.,
Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Soto-García, L. L., Claeys, M., Kourtchev, I.,
Rissler, J., Swietlicki, E., Tagliavini, E., Schkolnik, G., Falkovich, A. H.,
Rudich, Y., Fisch, G., and Gatti, L. V.: Overview of the inorganic and
organic composition of size-segregated aerosol in Rondônia, Brazil, from
the<?pagebreak page7332?> biomass-burning period to the onset of the wet season, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D01201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006741" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006741</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gelencsér, A., Hoffer, A., Kiss, G., Tombácz, E., Kurdi, R., and
Bencze, L.: In-situ Formation of Light-Absorbing Organic Matter in Cloud
Water, J. Atmos. Chem., 45, 25–33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024060428172" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1024060428172</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Gilardoni, S., Massoli, P., Paglione, M., Giulianelli, L., Carbone, C.,
Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Sandrini, S., Costabile, F., Gobbi, G. P.,
Pietrogrande, M. C., Visentin, M., Scotto, F., Fuzzi, S., and Facchini, M.
C.: Direct observation of aqueous secondary organic aerosol from
biomass-burning emissions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 10013–10018,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602212113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1602212113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Graham, B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Guyon, P., Roberts, G. C., Decesari, S.,
Facchini, M. C., Artaxo, P., Maenhaut, W., Köll, P., and Andreae, M. O.:
Water-soluble organic compounds in biomass burning aerosols over Amazonia 1.
Characterization by NMR and GC-MS, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107,
LBA14-1–LBA14-16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000336" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000336</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>He, S. and Carmichael, G. R.: Sensitivity of photolysis rates and ozone
production in the troposphere to aerosol properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
104, 26307–26324, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900789" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900789</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hecobian, A., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Frank, N., Edgerton, E. S., and Weber, R.
J.: Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol material and the light-absorption
characteristics of aqueous extracts measured over the Southeastern United
States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5965–5977,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hems, R. F. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Aqueous Phase Photo-oxidation of Brown
Carbon Nitrophenols: Reaction Kinetics, Mechanism, and Evolution of Light
Absorption, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 225–234,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00123</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Sullivan, A. P., Collett, J. L., and Robinson, A. L.:
Levoglucosan stability in biomass burning particles exposed to hydroxyl
radicals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L09806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL043088</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, D., Schaefer, T., Bräuer, P., and Tilgner, A.:
Tropospheric Aqueous-Phase Free-Radical Chemistry: Radical Sources, Spectra,
Reaction Kinetics and Prediction Tools, Chem. Phys. Chem., 11,
3796–3822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000533" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cphc.201000533</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Guyon, P., Kiss, G., Schmid, O., Frank, G.
P., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Optical properties of humic-like
substances (HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3563–3570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, D., Tilgner, A., Iinuma, Y., and Herrmann, H.: Atmospheric
Stability of Levoglucosan: A Detailed Laboratory and Modeling Study,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 694–699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es902476f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es902476f</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hopkins, R. J., Lewis, K., Desyaterik, Y., Wang, Z., Tivanski, A. V., Arnott,
W. P., Laskin, A., and Gilles, M. K.: Correlations between optical, chemical
and physical properties of biomass burn aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
L18806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030502</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Jo, D. S., Park, R. J., Lee, S., Kim, S.-W., and Zhang, X.: A global
simulation of brown carbon: implications for photochemistry and direct
radiative effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3413–3432,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kalogridis, A.-C., Popovicheva, O. B., Engling, G., Diapouli, E., Kawamura,
K., Tachibana, E., Ono, K., Kozlov, V. S., and Eleftheriadis, K.: Smoke
aerosol chemistry and aging of Siberian biomass burning emissions in a large
aerosol chamber, Atmos. Environ., 185, 15–28,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.033</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Kessler, S. H., Smith, J. D., Che, D. L., Worsnop, D. R., Wilson, K. R., and
Kroll, J. H.: Chemical Sinks of Organic Aerosol: Kinetics and Products of
the Heterogeneous Oxidation of Erythritol and Levoglucosan, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 44, 7005–7010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es101465m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es101465m</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W. and Thatcher, T. L.: Contribution of organic carbon to
wood smoke particulate matter absorption of solar radiation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 6067–6072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A., Langridge, J. M., Bahreini, R., Cappa, C. D., Middlebrook, A.
M., and Schwarz, J. P.: Brown carbon and internal mixing in biomass burning
particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 14802–14807,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206575109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1206575109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown
Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Lee, T., Sullivan, A. P., Mack, L., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Malm, W., Wold, C. E., Hao, W. M., and Collett
Jr., J. L.: Chemical Smoke Marker Emissions During Flaming and Smoldering
Phases of Laboratory Open Burning of Wildland Fuels, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44,
i–v, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.499884" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.499884</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lin, G., Penner, J. E., Flanner, M. G., Sillman, S., Xu, L., and Zhou, C.:
Radiative forcing of organic aerosol in the atmosphere and on snow: Effects
of SOA and brown carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
2013JD021186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021186" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD021186</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
and Laskin, A.: Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbon in Biomass
Burning Aerosol Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11815–11824,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>May, A. A., Saleh, R., Hennigan, C. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.:
Volatility of Organic Molecular Markers Used for Source Apportionment
Analysis: Measurements and Implications for Atmospheric Lifetime, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 46, 12435–12444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es302276t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es302276t</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Mazzoleni, L. R., Zielinska, B., and Moosmüller, H.: Emissions of
Levoglucosan, Methoxy Phenols, and Organic Acids from Prescribed Burns,
Laboratory Combustion of Wildland Fuels, and Residential Wood Combustion,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 2115–2122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es061702c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es061702c</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Xu,
L., Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Williams, L. R., Franklin, J. P., Zahniser,
M. S., Worsnop, D. R., Knighton, W. B., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K. J.,
Dubey, M. K., Allan, J. D., and Thornton, J. A.: Contribution of Nitrated
Phenols to Wood Burning Brown Carbon Light Absorption in Detling, United
Kingdom during Winter Time, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6316–6324,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400683v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es400683v</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7333?><ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Mok, J., Krotkov, N. A., Arola, A., Torres, O., Jethva, H., Andrade, M.,
Labow, G., Eck, T. F., Li, Z., Dickerson, R. R., Stenchikov, G. L., Osipov,
S., and Ren, X.: Impacts of brown carbon from biomass burning on surface UV
and ozone photochemistry in the Amazon Basin, Sci. Rep., 6, 36940,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36940" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep36940</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Ofner, J., Krüger, H.-U., Grothe, H., Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Whitmore, K.,
and Zetzsch, C.: Physico-chemical characterization of SOA derived from
catechol and guaiacol – a model substance for the aromatic fraction of
atmospheric HULIS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1–15,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Park, R. J., Kim, M. J., Jeong, J. I., Youn, D., and Kim, S.: A contribution
of brown carbon aerosol to the aerosol light absorption and its radiative
forcing in East Asia, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1414–1421,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.042</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Hennigan, C. J., McMeeking, G. R., Chuang, W. K., Robinson, E.
S., Coe, H., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Absorptivity of brown
carbon in fresh and photo-chemically aged biomass-burning emissions, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 7683–7693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7683-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7683-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Robinson, E. S., Tkacik, D. S., Ahern, A. T., Liu, S., Aiken, A.
C., Sullivan, R. C., Presto, A. A., Dubey, M. K., Yokelson, R. J., Donahue,
N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Brownness of organics in aerosols from biomass
burning linked to their black carbon content, Nat. Geosci., 7, 647–650,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2220" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2220</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Marks, M., Heo, J., Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A.
L.: Contribution of brown carbon and lensing to the direct radiative effect
of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and biofuel burning emissions, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 2015JD023697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023697</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Sang, X. F., Gensch, I., Kammer, B., Khan, A., Kleist, E., Laumer, W.,
Schlag, P., Schmitt, S. H., Wildt, J., Zhao, R., Mungall, E. L., Abbatt, J.
P. D., and Kiendler-Scharr, A.: Chemical stability of levoglucosan: An
isotopic perspective, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2016GL069179,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069179" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069179</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Scaramboni, C., Urban, R. C., Lima-Souza, M., Nogueira, R. F. P., Cardoso,
A. A., Allen, A. G., and Campos, M. L. A. M.: Total sugars in atmospheric
aerosols: An alternative tracer for biomass burning, Atmos. Environ., 100,
185–192, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.003</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Schnitzler, E. G. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Heterogeneous OH oxidation of
secondary brown carbon aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14539–14553,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14539" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14539</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Schroeder, W., Prins, E., Giglio, L., Csiszar, I., Schmidt, C., Morisette,
J., and Morton, D.: Validation of GOES and MODIS active fire detection
products using ASTER and ETM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> data, Remote Sens. Environ., 112,
2711–2726, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.01.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2008.01.005</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from
air pollution to climate change, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., New York,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Simoneit, B. R. T., Schauer, J. J., Nolte, C. G., Oros, D. R., Elias, V. O.,
Fraser, M. P., Rogge, W. F., and Cass, G. R.: Levoglucosan, a tracer for
cellulose in biomass burning and atmospheric particles, Atmos. Environ.,
33, 173–182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00145-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00145-9</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Slade, J. H. and Knopf, D. A.: Multiphase OH oxidation kinetics of organic
aerosol: The role of particle phase state and relative humidity, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 5297–5306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060582" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL060582</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Smith, J. D., Kinney, H., and Anastasio, C.: Phenolic carbonyls undergo rapid
aqueous photodegradation to form low-volatility, light-absorbing products,
Atmos. Environ., 126, 36–44, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.035</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling
System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Strigel, A. M., Yau, W. W., Kirkland, J. J., and Bly, D. D.:
Modern Size-Exclusion Liquid Chromatography, Second Edition, John Wiley
&amp; Sons, Inc., 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Sumlin, B. J., Pandey, A., Walker, M. J., Pattison, R. S., Williams, B. J.,
and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Atmospheric Photooxidation Diminishes Light
Absorption by Primary Brown Carbon Aerosol from Biomass Burning, Environ.
Sci. Technol. Lett., 4, 540–545, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Theodosi, C., Panagiotopoulos, C., Nouara, A., Zarmpas, P., Nicolaou, P.,
Violaki, K., Kanakidou, M., Sempéré, R., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Sugars
in atmospheric aerosols over the Eastern Mediterranean, Prog.
Oceanogr., 163, 70–81, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2017.09.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2017.09.001</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Urban, R. C., Lima-Souza, M., Caetano-Silva, L., Queiroz, M. E. C.,
Nogueira, R. F. P., Allen, A. G., Cardoso, A. A., Held, G., and Campos, M. L.
A. M.: Use of levoglucosan, potassium, and water-soluble organic carbon to
characterize the origins of biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 61,
562–569, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.082" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.082</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Ridley, D. A., Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R.,
Perring, A. E., Coe, H., Liu, D., and Clarke, A. D.: Exploiting simultaneous
observational constraints on mass and absorption to estimate the global
direct radiative forcing of black carbon and brown carbon, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 10989–11010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10989-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10989-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Sedlacek, A. J., de Sá, S. S., Martin, S. T.,
Alexander, M. L., Watson, T. B., Aiken, A. C., Springston, S. R., and Artaxo,
P.: Deriving brown carbon from multiwavelength absorption measurements:
method and application to AERONET and Aethalometer observations, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 12733–12752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12733-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12733-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Liu, J., Weber, R. J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez,
J. L., Schwarz, J. P., and Perring, A. E.: Exploring the observational
constraints on the simulation of brown carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18,
635–653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-635-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-635-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Hu, M., Lin, P., Guo, Q., Wu, Z., Li, M., Zeng, L., Song, Y.,
Zeng, L., Wu, Y., Guo, S., Huang, X., and He, L.: Molecular Characterization
of Nitrogen-Containing Organic Compounds in Humic-like Substances Emitted
from Straw Residue Burning, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5951–5961,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00248" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b00248</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P. S., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Changes in Light Absorptivity of
Molecular Weight Separated Brown Carbon Due to Photolytic Aging, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 8414–8421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b01739</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P. S., Tsagaraki, M., Tsiodra, I., Mihalopoulos, N., Violaki, K.,
Kanakidou, M., Sciare, J., Nenes, A., and<?pagebreak page7334?> Weber, R. J. Atmospheric evolution of molecular weight separated brown carbon from biomass burning, PANGAEA,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.896731" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.896731</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Wooster, M. J.: Small-scale experimental testing of fire radiative energy
for quantifying mass combusted in natural vegetation fires, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 29, 2027, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015487" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL015487</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Lin, Y.-H., Surratt, J. D., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
and Weber, R. J.: Light-absorbing soluble organic aerosol in Los Angeles and
Atlanta: A contrast in secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
38, L21810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049385</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Lin, Y.-H., Surratt, J. D., and Weber, R. J.: Sources, Composition
and Absorption Ångström Exponent of Light-absorbing Organic
Components in Aerosol Extracts from the Los Angeles Basin, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 3685–3693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es305047b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es305047b</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Forrister, H., Liu, J., Dibb, J., Anderson, B., Schwarz, J. P.,
Perring, A. E., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Wang, Y., Nenes, A., and
Weber, R. J.: Top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing affected by brown carbon
in the upper troposphere, Nat. Geosci., 10, 486–489,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2960" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2960</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, R., Mungall, E. L., Lee, A. K. Y., Aljawhary, D., and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
Aqueous-phase photooxidation of levoglucosan – a mechanistic study using
aerosol time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometry (Aerosol
ToF-CIMS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9695–9706,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9695-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-9695-2014</ext-link>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, R., Lee, A. K. Y., Huang, L., Li, X., Yang, F., and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
Photochemical processing of aqueous atmospheric brown carbon, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 6087–6100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Zhong, M. and Jang, M.: Dynamic light absorption of biomass-burning organic
carbon photochemically aged under natural sunlight, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 1517–1525, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1517-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1517-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, S., Collier, S., Jaffe, D. A., Briggs, N. L., Hee, J., Sedlacek III,
A. J., Kleinman, L., Onasch, T. B., and Zhang, Q.: Regional influence of
wildfires on aerosol chemistry in the western US and insights into
atmospheric aging of biomass burning organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
17, 2477–2493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2477-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2477-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, X. and Mopper, K.: Determination of photochemically produced hydroxyl
radicals in seawater and freshwater, Mar. Chem., 30, 71–88,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(90)90062-H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0304-4203(90)90062-H</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Atmospheric evolution of molecular-weight-separated brown carbon from biomass burning</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Biomass burning is a major source of atmospheric brown
carbon (BrC), and through its absorption of UV/VIS radiation,
it can play an important role in the planetary radiative balance and
atmospheric photochemistry. The considerable uncertainty of BrC impacts is
associated with its poorly constrained sources, transformations, and
atmospheric lifetime. Here we report laboratory experiments that examined
changes in the optical properties of the water-soluble (WS) BrC fraction of
laboratory-generated biomass burning particles from hardwood
pyrolysis. Effects of direct UVB photolysis and OH oxidation in the aqueous
phase on molecular-weight-separated BrC were studied. Results indicated that the majority of
low-molecular-weight (MW)
BrC ( &lt; 400&thinsp;Da) was rapidly photobleached by both direct photolysis and OH
oxidation on an atmospheric timescale of approximately 1&thinsp;h. High MW BrC
( ≥ 400&thinsp;Da) underwent initial photoenhancement up to  ∼ 15&thinsp;h,
followed by slow photobleaching over  ∼ 10&thinsp;h. The laboratory experiments
were supported by observations from ambient BrC samples that were collected
during the fire seasons in Greece. These samples, containing freshly emitted
to aged biomass burning aerosol, were analyzed for both water- and
methanol-soluble BrC. Consistent with the laboratory experiments, high-MW BrC
dominated the total light absorption at 365&thinsp;nm for both methanol and
water-soluble fractions of ambient samples with atmospheric transport times
of 1 to 68&thinsp;h. These ambient observations indicate that overall,
biomass burning BrC across all molecular weights has an atmospheric lifetime
of 15 to 28&thinsp;h, consistent with estimates from previous field studies –
although the BrC associated with the high-MW fraction remains relatively
stable and is responsible for light absorption properties of BrC throughout most of its atmospheric lifetime. For
ambient samples of aged ( &gt; 10&thinsp;h) biomass burning emissions, poor linear
correlations were found between light absorptivity and levoglucosan,
consistent with other studies suggesting a short atmospheric lifetime for
levoglucosan. However, a much stronger correlation between light absorptivity
and total hydrous sugars was observed, suggesting that they may serve as more
robust tracers for aged biomass burning emissions. Overall, the results from
this study suggest that robust model estimates of BrC radiative impacts
require consideration of the atmospheric aging of BrC and the stability of
high-MW BrC.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alexander, D. T. L., Crozier, P. A., and Anderson, J. R.: Brown Carbon
Spheres in East Asian Outflow and Their Optical Properties, Science,
321, 833–836, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155296</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Anastasio, C. and McGregor, K. G.: Chemistry of fog waters in California's
Central Valley: 1. In situ photoformation of hydroxyl radical and singlet
molecular oxygen, Atmos. Environ., 35, 1079–1089,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00281-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00281-8</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The
nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3131–3148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Arakaki, T., Anastasio, C., Kuroki, Y., Nakajima, H., Okada, K., Kotani, Y.,
Handa, D., Azechi, S., Kimura, T., Tsuhako, A., and Miyagi, Y.: A General
Scavenging Rate Constant for Reaction of Hydroxyl Radical with Organic
Carbon in Atmospheric Waters, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 8196–8203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es401927b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es401927b</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Badali, K. M., Zhou, S., Aljawhary, D., Antiñolo, M., Chen, W. J., Lok,
A., Mungall, E., Wong, J. P. S., Zhao, R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Formation of
hydroxyl radicals from photolysis of secondary organic aerosol material,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7831–7840, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7831-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7831-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C.: Spectral dependence of visible light absorption by carbonaceous
particles emitted from coal combustion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28,
4075–4078, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013652" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013652</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bougiatioti, A., Stavroulas, I., Kostenidou, E., Zarmpas, P., Theodosi, C.,
Kouvarakis, G., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Nenes, A., Pandis,
S. N., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Processing of biomass-burning aerosol in the
eastern Mediterranean during summertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
4793–4807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4793-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4793-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, J. L. and Thompson, J. E.: Characterization of colored products
formed during irradiation of aqueous solutions containing H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and phenolic
compounds, Atmos. Environ., 44, 541–551,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.042</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood
combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Desyaterik, Y., Sun, Y., Shen, X., Lee, T., Wang, X., Wang, T., and Collett,
J. L.: Speciation of “brown” carbon in cloud water impacted by
agricultural biomass burning in eastern China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 7389–7399, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Di Lorenzo, R. A. and Young, C. J.: Size separation method for absorption
characterization in brown carbon: Application to an aged biomass burning
sample, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2015GL066954, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066954" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066954</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Di Lorenzo, R. A., Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Guo, H., Xu, L., Ng,
N. L., Weber, R. J., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E., and Young, C. J.:
Molecular-Size-Separated Brown Carbon Absorption for Biomass-Burning Aerosol
at Multiple Field Sites, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 3128–3137,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06160</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Di Lorenzo, R. A., Place, B. K., VandenBoer, T. C., and Young, C. J.:
Composition of Size-Resolved Aged Boreal Fire Aerosols: Brown Carbon, Biomass
Burning Tracers, and Reduced Nitrogen, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 278–285,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00137" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00137</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Dinar, E., Riziq, A. A., Spindler, C., Erlick, C., Kiss, G., and Rudich, Y.:
The complex refractive index of atmospheric and model humic-like substances
(HULIS) retrieved by a cavity ring down aerosol spectrometer (CRD-AS),
Faraday Discuss., 137, 279–295, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B703111D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B703111D</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B.: Modeling the Processing of Aerosol and Trace Gases in Clouds and
Fogs, Chem. Rev., 115, 4157–4198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, X., Wei, S., Zhu, M., Song, J., and Peng, P.: Comprehensive
characterization of humic-like substances in smoke PM2.5 emitted from the
combustion of biomass materials and fossil fuels, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
16, 13321–13340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13321-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13321-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant
atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
8607–8621, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Forrister, H., Liu, J., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., Ziemba, L., Thornhill, K. L.,
Anderson, B., Diskin, G., Perring, A. E., Schwarz, J. P., Campuzano-Jost,
P., Day, D. A., Palm, B. B., Jimenez, J. L., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.:
Evolution of brown carbon in wildfire plumes: Brown Carbon in Biomass
Burning Plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4623–4630,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063897" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063897</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fourtziou, L., Liakakou, E., Stavroulas, I., Theodosi, C., Zarmpas, P.,
Psiloglou, B., Sciare, J., Maggos, T., Bairachtari, K., Bougiatioti, A.,
Gerasopoulos, E., Sarda-Estève, R., Bonnaire, N., and Mihalopoulos, N.:
Multi-tracer approach to characterize domestic wood burning in Athens
(Greece) during wintertime, Atmos. Environ., 148, 89–101,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.011</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fuzzi, S., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Cavalli, F., Emblico, L., Mircea,
M., Andreae, M. O., Trebs, I., Hoffer, A., Guyon, P., Artaxo, P., Rizzo, L.
V., Lara, L. L., Pauliquevis, T., Maenhaut, W., Raes, N., Chi, X.,
Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Soto-García, L. L., Claeys, M., Kourtchev, I.,
Rissler, J., Swietlicki, E., Tagliavini, E., Schkolnik, G., Falkovich, A. H.,
Rudich, Y., Fisch, G., and Gatti, L. V.: Overview of the inorganic and
organic composition of size-segregated aerosol in Rondônia, Brazil, from
the biomass-burning period to the onset of the wet season, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D01201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006741" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006741</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gelencsér, A., Hoffer, A., Kiss, G., Tombácz, E., Kurdi, R., and
Bencze, L.: In-situ Formation of Light-Absorbing Organic Matter in Cloud
Water, J. Atmos. Chem., 45, 25–33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024060428172" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024060428172</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Gilardoni, S., Massoli, P., Paglione, M., Giulianelli, L., Carbone, C.,
Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Sandrini, S., Costabile, F., Gobbi, G. P.,
Pietrogrande, M. C., Visentin, M., Scotto, F., Fuzzi, S., and Facchini, M.
C.: Direct observation of aqueous secondary organic aerosol from
biomass-burning emissions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 10013–10018,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602212113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602212113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Graham, B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Guyon, P., Roberts, G. C., Decesari, S.,
Facchini, M. C., Artaxo, P., Maenhaut, W., Köll, P., and Andreae, M. O.:
Water-soluble organic compounds in biomass burning aerosols over Amazonia 1.
Characterization by NMR and GC-MS, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107,
LBA14-1–LBA14-16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000336" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000336</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
He, S. and Carmichael, G. R.: Sensitivity of photolysis rates and ozone
production in the troposphere to aerosol properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
104, 26307–26324, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900789" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900789</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hecobian, A., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Frank, N., Edgerton, E. S., and Weber, R.
J.: Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol material and the light-absorption
characteristics of aqueous extracts measured over the Southeastern United
States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5965–5977,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hems, R. F. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Aqueous Phase Photo-oxidation of Brown
Carbon Nitrophenols: Reaction Kinetics, Mechanism, and Evolution of Light
Absorption, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 225–234,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00123</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hennigan, C. J., Sullivan, A. P., Collett, J. L., and Robinson, A. L.:
Levoglucosan stability in biomass burning particles exposed to hydroxyl
radicals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L09806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043088" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043088</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, D., Schaefer, T., Bräuer, P., and Tilgner, A.:
Tropospheric Aqueous-Phase Free-Radical Chemistry: Radical Sources, Spectra,
Reaction Kinetics and Prediction Tools, Chem. Phys. Chem., 11,
3796–3822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000533" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000533</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Guyon, P., Kiss, G., Schmid, O., Frank, G.
P., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Optical properties of humic-like
substances (HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3563–3570, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, D., Tilgner, A., Iinuma, Y., and Herrmann, H.: Atmospheric
Stability of Levoglucosan: A Detailed Laboratory and Modeling Study,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 694–699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es902476f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es902476f</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hopkins, R. J., Lewis, K., Desyaterik, Y., Wang, Z., Tivanski, A. V., Arnott,
W. P., Laskin, A., and Gilles, M. K.: Correlations between optical, chemical
and physical properties of biomass burn aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
L18806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030502</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jo, D. S., Park, R. J., Lee, S., Kim, S.-W., and Zhang, X.: A global
simulation of brown carbon: implications for photochemistry and direct
radiative effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3413–3432,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kalogridis, A.-C., Popovicheva, O. B., Engling, G., Diapouli, E., Kawamura,
K., Tachibana, E., Ono, K., Kozlov, V. S., and Eleftheriadis, K.: Smoke
aerosol chemistry and aging of Siberian biomass burning emissions in a large
aerosol chamber, Atmos. Environ., 185, 15–28,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.033</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kessler, S. H., Smith, J. D., Che, D. L., Worsnop, D. R., Wilson, K. R., and
Kroll, J. H.: Chemical Sinks of Organic Aerosol: Kinetics and Products of
the Heterogeneous Oxidation of Erythritol and Levoglucosan, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 44, 7005–7010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es101465m" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es101465m</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchstetter, T. W. and Thatcher, T. L.: Contribution of organic carbon to
wood smoke particulate matter absorption of solar radiation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 6067–6072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A., Langridge, J. M., Bahreini, R., Cappa, C. D., Middlebrook, A.
M., and Schwarz, J. P.: Brown carbon and internal mixing in biomass burning
particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 14802–14807,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206575109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206575109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown
Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, T., Sullivan, A. P., Mack, L., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Malm, W., Wold, C. E., Hao, W. M., and Collett
Jr., J. L.: Chemical Smoke Marker Emissions During Flaming and Smoldering
Phases of Laboratory Open Burning of Wildland Fuels, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44,
i–v, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.499884" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.499884</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, G., Penner, J. E., Flanner, M. G., Sillman, S., Xu, L., and Zhou, C.:
Radiative forcing of organic aerosol in the atmosphere and on snow: Effects
of SOA and brown carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
2013JD021186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021186" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021186</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
and Laskin, A.: Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbon in Biomass
Burning Aerosol Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11815–11824,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
May, A. A., Saleh, R., Hennigan, C. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.:
Volatility of Organic Molecular Markers Used for Source Apportionment
Analysis: Measurements and Implications for Atmospheric Lifetime, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 46, 12435–12444, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es302276t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es302276t</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Mazzoleni, L. R., Zielinska, B., and Moosmüller, H.: Emissions of
Levoglucosan, Methoxy Phenols, and Organic Acids from Prescribed Burns,
Laboratory Combustion of Wildland Fuels, and Residential Wood Combustion,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 2115–2122, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es061702c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es061702c</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Xu,
L., Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Williams, L. R., Franklin, J. P., Zahniser,
M. S., Worsnop, D. R., Knighton, W. B., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K. J.,
Dubey, M. K., Allan, J. D., and Thornton, J. A.: Contribution of Nitrated
Phenols to Wood Burning Brown Carbon Light Absorption in Detling, United
Kingdom during Winter Time, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6316–6324,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400683v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es400683v</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Mok, J., Krotkov, N. A., Arola, A., Torres, O., Jethva, H., Andrade, M.,
Labow, G., Eck, T. F., Li, Z., Dickerson, R. R., Stenchikov, G. L., Osipov,
S., and Ren, X.: Impacts of brown carbon from biomass burning on surface UV
and ozone photochemistry in the Amazon Basin, Sci. Rep., 6, 36940,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36940" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36940</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Ofner, J., Krüger, H.-U., Grothe, H., Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Whitmore, K.,
and Zetzsch, C.: Physico-chemical characterization of SOA derived from
catechol and guaiacol – a model substance for the aromatic fraction of
atmospheric HULIS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1–15,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Park, R. J., Kim, M. J., Jeong, J. I., Youn, D., and Kim, S.: A contribution
of brown carbon aerosol to the aerosol light absorption and its radiative
forcing in East Asia, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1414–1421,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.042</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Saleh, R., Hennigan, C. J., McMeeking, G. R., Chuang, W. K., Robinson, E.
S., Coe, H., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Absorptivity of brown
carbon in fresh and photo-chemically aged biomass-burning emissions, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 7683–7693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7683-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7683-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Saleh, R., Robinson, E. S., Tkacik, D. S., Ahern, A. T., Liu, S., Aiken, A.
C., Sullivan, R. C., Presto, A. A., Dubey, M. K., Yokelson, R. J., Donahue,
N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Brownness of organics in aerosols from biomass
burning linked to their black carbon content, Nat. Geosci., 7, 647–650,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2220" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2220</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Saleh, R., Marks, M., Heo, J., Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A.
L.: Contribution of brown carbon and lensing to the direct radiative effect
of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and biofuel burning emissions, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 2015JD023697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Sang, X. F., Gensch, I., Kammer, B., Khan, A., Kleist, E., Laumer, W.,
Schlag, P., Schmitt, S. H., Wildt, J., Zhao, R., Mungall, E. L., Abbatt, J.
P. D., and Kiendler-Scharr, A.: Chemical stability of levoglucosan: An
isotopic perspective, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2016GL069179,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069179" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069179</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Scaramboni, C., Urban, R. C., Lima-Souza, M., Nogueira, R. F. P., Cardoso,
A. A., Allen, A. G., and Campos, M. L. A. M.: Total sugars in atmospheric
aerosols: An alternative tracer for biomass burning, Atmos. Environ., 100,
185–192, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.003</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Schnitzler, E. G. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Heterogeneous OH oxidation of
secondary brown carbon aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14539–14553,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14539" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14539</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Schroeder, W., Prins, E., Giglio, L., Csiszar, I., Schmidt, C., Morisette,
J., and Morton, D.: Validation of GOES and MODIS active fire detection
products using ASTER and ETM+ data, Remote Sens. Environ., 112,
2711–2726, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.01.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.01.005</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from
air pollution to climate change, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., New York,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Simoneit, B. R. T., Schauer, J. J., Nolte, C. G., Oros, D. R., Elias, V. O.,
Fraser, M. P., Rogge, W. F., and Cass, G. R.: Levoglucosan, a tracer for
cellulose in biomass burning and atmospheric particles, Atmos. Environ.,
33, 173–182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00145-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00145-9</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Slade, J. H. and Knopf, D. A.: Multiphase OH oxidation kinetics of organic
aerosol: The role of particle phase state and relative humidity, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 5297–5306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060582" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060582</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. D., Kinney, H., and Anastasio, C.: Phenolic carbonyls undergo rapid
aqueous photodegradation to form low-volatility, light-absorbing products,
Atmos. Environ., 126, 36–44, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.035</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling
System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Strigel, A. M., Yau, W. W., Kirkland, J. J., and Bly, D. D.:
Modern Size-Exclusion Liquid Chromatography, Second Edition, John Wiley
&amp; Sons, Inc., 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Sumlin, B. J., Pandey, A., Walker, M. J., Pattison, R. S., Williams, B. J.,
and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Atmospheric Photooxidation Diminishes Light
Absorption by Primary Brown Carbon Aerosol from Biomass Burning, Environ.
Sci. Technol. Lett., 4, 540–545, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Theodosi, C., Panagiotopoulos, C., Nouara, A., Zarmpas, P., Nicolaou, P.,
Violaki, K., Kanakidou, M., Sempéré, R., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Sugars
in atmospheric aerosols over the Eastern Mediterranean, Prog.
Oceanogr., 163, 70–81, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2017.09.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2017.09.001</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Urban, R. C., Lima-Souza, M., Caetano-Silva, L., Queiroz, M. E. C.,
Nogueira, R. F. P., Allen, A. G., Cardoso, A. A., Held, G., and Campos, M. L.
A. M.: Use of levoglucosan, potassium, and water-soluble organic carbon to
characterize the origins of biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 61,
562–569, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.082" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.082</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Ridley, D. A., Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R.,
Perring, A. E., Coe, H., Liu, D., and Clarke, A. D.: Exploiting simultaneous
observational constraints on mass and absorption to estimate the global
direct radiative forcing of black carbon and brown carbon, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 10989–11010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10989-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10989-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Sedlacek, A. J., de Sá, S. S., Martin, S. T.,
Alexander, M. L., Watson, T. B., Aiken, A. C., Springston, S. R., and Artaxo,
P.: Deriving brown carbon from multiwavelength absorption measurements:
method and application to AERONET and Aethalometer observations, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 12733–12752, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12733-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12733-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Liu, J., Weber, R. J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez,
J. L., Schwarz, J. P., and Perring, A. E.: Exploring the observational
constraints on the simulation of brown carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18,
635–653, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-635-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-635-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Hu, M., Lin, P., Guo, Q., Wu, Z., Li, M., Zeng, L., Song, Y.,
Zeng, L., Wu, Y., Guo, S., Huang, X., and He, L.: Molecular Characterization
of Nitrogen-Containing Organic Compounds in Humic-like Substances Emitted
from Straw Residue Burning, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5951–5961,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00248" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00248</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Wong, J. P. S., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Changes in Light Absorptivity of
Molecular Weight Separated Brown Carbon Due to Photolytic Aging, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 8414–8421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01739" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01739</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Wong, J. P. S., Tsagaraki, M., Tsiodra, I., Mihalopoulos, N., Violaki, K.,
Kanakidou, M., Sciare, J., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J. Atmospheric evolution of molecular weight separated brown carbon from biomass burning, PANGAEA,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.896731" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.896731</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Wooster, M. J.: Small-scale experimental testing of fire radiative energy
for quantifying mass combusted in natural vegetation fires, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 29, 2027, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015487" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015487</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Lin, Y.-H., Surratt, J. D., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
and Weber, R. J.: Light-absorbing soluble organic aerosol in Los Angeles and
Atlanta: A contrast in secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
38, L21810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049385</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Lin, Y.-H., Surratt, J. D., and Weber, R. J.: Sources, Composition
and Absorption Ångström Exponent of Light-absorbing Organic
Components in Aerosol Extracts from the Los Angeles Basin, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 3685–3693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es305047b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es305047b</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Forrister, H., Liu, J., Dibb, J., Anderson, B., Schwarz, J. P.,
Perring, A. E., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Wang, Y., Nenes, A., and
Weber, R. J.: Top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing affected by brown carbon
in the upper troposphere, Nat. Geosci., 10, 486–489,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2960" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2960</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, R., Mungall, E. L., Lee, A. K. Y., Aljawhary, D., and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
Aqueous-phase photooxidation of levoglucosan – a mechanistic study using
aerosol time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometry (Aerosol
ToF-CIMS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9695–9706,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9695-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9695-2014</a>, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, R., Lee, A. K. Y., Huang, L., Li, X., Yang, F., and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
Photochemical processing of aqueous atmospheric brown carbon, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 6087–6100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Zhong, M. and Jang, M.: Dynamic light absorption of biomass-burning organic
carbon photochemically aged under natural sunlight, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 1517–1525, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1517-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1517-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, S., Collier, S., Jaffe, D. A., Briggs, N. L., Hee, J., Sedlacek III,
A. J., Kleinman, L., Onasch, T. B., and Zhang, Q.: Regional influence of
wildfires on aerosol chemistry in the western US and insights into
atmospheric aging of biomass burning organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
17, 2477–2493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2477-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2477-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, X. and Mopper, K.: Determination of photochemically produced hydroxyl
radicals in seawater and freshwater, Mar. Chem., 30, 71–88,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(90)90062-H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(90)90062-H</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
