<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-7255-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Low-volatility compounds contribute significantly to isoprene secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions</article-title><alt-title>Low-volatility compounds contribute significantly to isoprene SOA</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Low-volatility compounds contribute significantly to isoprene SOA}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R. H. Schwantes et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff5">
          <name><surname>Schwantes</surname><given-names>Rebecca H.</given-names></name>
          <email>rschwant@ucar.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-3718</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Charan</surname><given-names>Sophia M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2023-6403</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff6">
          <name><surname>Bates</surname><given-names>Kelvin H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Yuanlong</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-8904</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>Tran B.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9206-4359</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mai</surname><given-names>Huajun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kong</surname><given-names>Weimeng</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9432-2857</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Flagan</surname><given-names>Richard C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5690-770X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Seinfeld</surname><given-names>John H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1344-4068</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91125, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91125, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California – Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>currently at: National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 80307, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>b</label><institution>currently at: Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Rebecca H. Schwantes (rschwant@ucar.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>7255</fpage><lpage>7278</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>11</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e203">Recent advances in our knowledge of the gas-phase oxidation of
isoprene, the impact of chamber walls on secondary organic aerosol (SOA) mass
yields, and aerosol measurement analysis techniques warrant reevaluating SOA
yields from isoprene. In particular, SOA from isoprene oxidation under
high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions forms via two major pathways: (1) low-volatility
nitrates and dinitrates (LV pathway) and (2) hydroxymethyl-methyl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-lactone (HMML) reaction on a surface or the
condensed phase of particles to form 2-methyl glyceric acid and its oligomers
(2MGA pathway). These SOA production pathways respond differently to reaction
conditions. Past chamber experiments generated SOA with varying contributions
from these two unique pathways, leading to results that are difficult to
interpret. This study examines the SOA yields from these two pathways
independently, which improves the interpretation of previous results and
provides further understanding of the relevance of chamber SOA yields to the
atmosphere and regional or global modeling. Results suggest that low-volatility
nitrates and dinitrates produce significantly more aerosol than previously
thought; the experimentally measured SOA mass yield from the LV pathway is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Sufficient seed surface area at the start of the reaction is
needed to limit the effects of vapor wall losses of low-volatility compounds
and accurately measure the complete SOA mass yield. Under dry conditions,
substantial amounts of SOA are formed from HMML ring-opening reactions with
inorganic ions and HMML organic oligomerization processes. However, the
lactone organic oligomerization reactions are suppressed under more
atmospherically relevant humidity levels, where hydration of the lactone is
more competitive. This limits the SOA formation potential from the 2MGA
pathway to HMML ring-opening reactions with water or inorganic ions under
typical atmospheric conditions. The isoprene SOA mass yield from the LV
pathway measured in this work is significantly higher than previous studies
have reported, suggesting that low-volatility compounds such as organic
nitrates and dinitrates may contribute to isoprene SOA under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions significantly more than previously thought and thus deserve
continued study.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page7256?><p id="d1e254">In the atmosphere, submicrometer particulate matter is composed of a
significant fraction of organic aerosol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.1"/>. There are two
forms of organic aerosol: primary, which is directly emitted into the
atmosphere, and secondary, which is formed when gas-phase compounds partition
to the particle phase. Processes governing secondary organic aerosol (SOA)
formation are particularly complex <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.2"/>. SOA
yields, the ratio of the mass of SOA formed to the mass of the parent
volatile organic compound (VOC) reacted, are measured in environmental
chambers and are used in models to reduce the complexity of SOA formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e263">Isoprene is the dominant non-methane biogenic VOC emitted into the
atmosphere. Because of the large flux of isoprene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">535</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
into the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.3"/>, oxidation of isoprene is a
significant source of SOA even though SOA yields measured in chambers are
relatively low <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.4"/>. Despite numerous experimental studies of
isoprene SOA formation under varying conditions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx85 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="post">etc.</named-content></xref>,
a consensus on the magnitude of SOA formed from isoprene oxidation by the
hydroxyl radical (OH) is still lacking
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.6"/>. This lack of consensus in the
experimental data leads recent global modeling studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.7"/> to implement SOA schemes that produce
significantly different overall isoprene SOA yields. Isoprene SOA yields have
been shown to depend on a variety of factors including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio, relative humidity, degree of oxidation, temperature, seed surface
area, particle acidity, and chamber irradiation source <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.8"/>.
These experimental conditions have not always been controlled or reported,
which is likely a major reason for the variability seen in past isoprene SOA
yields. By measuring isoprene SOA yields while controlling for seed surface
area, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, relative humidity, and temperature, we
seek to resolve uncertainties in SOA formation in past yields.</p>
      <p id="d1e362">Recent advances have improved our understanding of how chamber SOA yields
should be measured and analyzed. This includes accounting carefully for
particle wall deposition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.9"/>, vapor wall deposition
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.10"/>, and particle coagulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.11"/>.
Advances have also taken place in the data processing of aerosol size
distribution measurements by the differential mobility analyzer coupled to a
condensation particle counter (DMA-CPC), the main instrument used to measure
SOA yields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.12"/>. Because isoprene SOA yields tend to be
relatively small, the DMA data inversion technique and correction for CPC
response time are quite important.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e380">Simplified chemical mechanism of isoprene OH-initiated oxidation
under high-NO conditions, largely based on schemes in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.13"/>,
emphasizing SOA generated from the LV pathway, which includes low-volatility
organic nitrates and dinitrates in red. Compounds detected in the gas phase
by the chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS) are highlighted with a
blue square.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7255/2019/acp-19-7255-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e394">Simplified chemical mechanism of methacrolein OH-initiated oxidation
under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, largely based on schemes in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.14"/>, emphasizing SOA generated from the 2MGA pathway
including 2-methyl glyceric acid (2-MGA) and its oligomers in blue. Aerosol
mass spectrometer (AMS) fragments likely corresponding to each compound are
boxed in magenta.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7255/2019/acp-19-7255-2019-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e417">Additionally, there have been major recent advances in our understanding of
isoprene gas-phase oxidation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.15"><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>
including theoretical <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.16"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>
and experimental <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.17"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>
studies. This improved understanding of isoprene gas-phase chemistry
influences the processes governing isoprene SOA formation and informs the
experimental design of the present work. This work focuses on the production
of SOA from OH-initiated isoprene oxidation under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions,
which occurs via two major chemical pathways (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). The first we define
throughout as the low-volatility (LV) pathway representing all aerosol formed
from the equilibrium gas–particle partitioning of compounds with sufficiently
low volatility, which mostly include functionalized nitrates and dinitrates
(e.g., red compounds in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). The second we
define as the 2-methyl glyceric acid (2MGA) pathway representing aerosol
formed from 2-MGA, its oligomers, its organosulfates, and its organonitrates
(blue compounds in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). There are many definitions
for high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.18"/>. Here we test two different
high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical regimes. Experiments targeting the LV pathway are
designed such that all peroxy radicals including acyl peroxy radicals
dominantly react with NO and experiments targeting the 2-MGA pathway are
designed such that all acyl peroxy radicals dominantly react with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
all other peroxy radicals dominantly react with NO.</p>
      <p id="d1e492">Aerosol from the LV pathway is believed to be composed largely of isoprene
dihydroxy dinitrates, which are produced from the first-generation hydroxy
nitrate reacting with OH to form a peroxy radical that then reacts with NO.
The gas-phase yield of isoprene dihydroxy dinitrates is quite uncertain
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.19"/>. In general, the nitrate yields from highly functionalized
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals have not been well studied <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.20"/> due mostly to
difficulties in measuring such low-volatility compounds. The formation of
some organic nitrate SOA precursors are summarized in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>, which is largely adapted from schemes presented in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.21"/> with the exception of the isoprene dihydroxy nitrooxy
alkoxy radical 1,5 H shift. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.22"/> suggests the importance of a
similar peroxy radical 1,5 H shift, which will not form in the present
experiments due to the high levels of NO. However, based on past studies
largely on alkane oxidation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.23"/>, the equivalent
alkoxy radical 1,5 H shift is expected to occur and has the potential to form
low-volatility nitrates as further described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e526">Throughout the text we use low volatility as a general term representing
gas-phase compounds with a potential to exist partially in the particle
phase. In this work, low-volatility compounds include the following
volatility classes from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.24"/>: IVOC (intermediate), SVOC
(semi), LVOC (low), and ELVOC (extremely low). When referring to specific
volatility classes, the acronyms defined above are used.</p>
      <p id="d1e533">Aerosol from the 2MGA pathway forms when methacrolein is oxidized under
high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions to form methylacryloyl peroxynitrate (MPAN). MPAN
reacts with OH to form hydroxymethyl-methyl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-lactone<?pagebreak page7257?> (HMML), and HMML
either decomposes in the gas phase to form hydroxy acetone or interacts with
a wet surface to form 2-methyl glyceric acid (2-MGA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.25"/>. A minor
channel to form methacrylic acid epoxide (MAE) also exists from methacrolein
oxidation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.26"/> but not from pure MPAN oxidation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.27"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.28"/> demonstrated that MAE does not easily
undergo ring-opening reactions to form particles. Thus, the yield of MAE from
methacrolein (MACR) oxidation reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.29"/> should be adjusted to include only
MAE detected in the gas phase, which corresponds to a yield of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–2 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e580">Because SOA formed from the LV and 2MGA pathways is chemically distinct both in the route of formation and composition, the experiments reported here probed
these chemical pathways separately. This experimental design is aimed to
resolve inconsistencies associated with previously reported isoprene SOA
yields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.30"/> and improve our understanding of isoprene SOA
formation. Additionally, we seek to report updated isoprene SOA yields and trace the SOA yields to known gas-phase SOA precursors.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page7258?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental methods</title>
      <p id="d1e594">Chamber experiments were performed to study SOA formation from isoprene
oxidation under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions from two distinct pathways: (1) low-volatility nitrates and dinitrates (LV pathway) and (2) 2-MGA and its
oligomers (2MGA pathway). Experiments targeting the LV pathway were performed
using isoprene as the precursor, and an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was maintained
throughout the entire experiment (as verified by the kinetic mechanism) in
order to favor the formation of nitrates and dinitrates and limit the
formation of MPAN (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Experiments targeting
the 2MGA pathway were performed using methacrolein as the precursor, and an
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was maintained throughout the entire experiment (as
verified by the kinetic mechanism) with the exception of experiment M9, which
maintained an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio accentuated the
formation of MPAN, and thereby 2-MGA (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), and was
important for reducing variability between the experiments. If a lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio was used, small fluctuations in the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or NO
would result in large differences in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. In order to
completely separate the LV and 2MGA pathways, methacrolein had to be used as
the VOC precursor for the 2MGA pathway experiments. If isoprene was used,
even at the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios used in the 2MGA pathway experiments, the
SOA precursors from the LV pathway would form resulting in a mixed regime
(i.e., chemistry in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> is not dependent on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration). In each case, the effect of seed surface area,
temperature, and humidity on the SOA yield was independently determined.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e776">Initial conditions and SOA yield for all
experiments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Expt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[VOC]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[NO]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">[Aer Vol]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">[Aer SA]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Avg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Avg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">OH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">SOA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">no.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">RH (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Yield</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9">Dry control experiments </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">788</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">109</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2130</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">183</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3360</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">24.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">375</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5390</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9">Experiments optimized for LV pathway (VOC precursor is isoprene) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">585</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">118</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">526</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">117</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1170</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">26.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">519</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">117</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">183</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3420</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">518</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">116</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">337</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5770</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">26.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">506</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">117</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">159</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2830</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">541</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">118</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">152</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2660</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">32.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">527</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">117</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">197</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3580</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">519</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">118</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">109</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1790</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">44.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">489</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">166</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2750</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">78.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">516</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">111</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1580</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">490</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">115</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">264</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4770</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9">Experiments optimized for 2MGA pathway (VOC precursor is methacrolein) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">M1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">376</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">234</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">M2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">365</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">235</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1640</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">M3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">345</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">236</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">118</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">M4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">356</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">235</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1040</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">M5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">375</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">235</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1740</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">31.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">M6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">334</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">235</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">104</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1720</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">47.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">M7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">339</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">233</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">134</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2340</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">67.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">M8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">352</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">236</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">141</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2510</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">81.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">M9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">298</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">229</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1910</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e779">Acronyms are defined as follows: VOC – volatile organic
compound; NO – nitric oxide; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – nitrogen dioxide;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – methyl nitrite; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – temperature; RH – relative humidity. OH (hydroxyl radical) is estimated from the VOC
decay over the first 3 h of each experiment. [Aer Vol]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
particle wall-loss-corrected seed volume at the start of photooxidation,
which is used to determine the uncertainty in the particle wall loss
correction as explained in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>. [Aer SA]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
surface area of the seed aerosol at the start of photooxidation not corrected
for particle wall loss and is used to understand how the SOA yield changes
depending on the surface area of the suspended particles (e.g.,
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). The SOA yield is the mass fraction after
10 h of photooxidation.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Experimental conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e2291">Experiments (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) were conducted in the Caltech dual
chamber facility using a 21 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Teflon chamber. Prior to each experiment,
the chamber was flushed with dry, purified air for 24 h. For humid
experiments, the chamber was humidified prior to all injections. Ultrapure water (18 M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Millipore Milli-Q) at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C was
recirculated through a Nafion membrane humidifier (FC200, Permapure LLC)
while purified air flowed through the humidifier and into the chamber.
First, isoprene (99 % purity) or methacrolein (95 % purity)<?pagebreak page7259?> was injected into
a glass bulb using a gas-tight syringe and was carried by a flow of dry
nitrogen into the chamber.</p>
      <p id="d1e2321">Second, methyl nitrite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was injected into the chamber. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was synthesized using the technique described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.31"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.32"/> and was stored in liquid nitrogen. Prior to each experiment, an
evacuated glass bulb was filled with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the desired pressure, as
measured by a capacitance manometer (MKS Baratron<sup>™</sup>). This bulb was then
backfilled with nitrogen and flushed into the chamber. The bulb pressure was
used to calculate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio in the chamber (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). After <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was injected, pulses of purified air were
added to the chamber to enhance mixing. Once the chamber was adequately
mixed, NO (501 ppm in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Scott Specialty Gases) or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (488 ppm in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Scott Specialty Gases) was injected into the chamber through a
calibrated mass flow controller. Again the chamber was mixed by pulses of
purified air.</p>
      <p id="d1e2435">Seed particles were generated from an atomizer using 0.06 M
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seed solution. The seed aerosol was directed through a
soft X-ray neutralizer (TSI Model 3088) prior to injection into the chamber
to ensure a consistent initial particle charge distribution for all
experiments. For humid experiments, the seed aerosol was directed through a
wet-wall denuder after exiting the neutralizer in order to ensure the
particles were deliquesced. After seed injection, mixing air was turned on
for 1 min to enhance mixing. The seed aerosol particle number concentration
had an approximately lognormal diameter distribution centered on average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm.</p>
      <p id="d1e2471">After injecting all gas-phase precursors and seed aerosol, photooxidation was
delayed by 1 h for experiments with no<?pagebreak page7260?> initial seed aerosol and 4 h for
experiments with initial seed aerosol. The rate of particle wall deposition
was measured for each experiment during this 4 h delay. Although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
not intentionally added for the LV pathway experiments, a modest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
signal was observed to form during the 4 h delay and is reported in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. This “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” signal may be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> itself or an interference
in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> monitor from an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compound (e.g., known interferences
include organic nitrates, nitrous acid, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The small signal of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or a different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compound, is not expected to influence the results
given the significantly larger initial NO levels (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). When
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were injected into the chamber, an NO signal was observed
on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> monitor. As the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> monitor has few interferences for NO, a
small fraction of NO was likely formed from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis in
the Teflon injection lines. Thus, the slight increase in NO with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> injection was assumed and reported to be initial NO (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2679">The Caltech chamber uses ultraviolet (UV) broadband lights with the main
emission peak centered at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm. Only 10 % of full light capacity
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was used for these experiments
because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolyzes rapidly, and the lower light intensity minimizes
chamber temperature increases (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C on average) caused by
the UV lights. In all experiments, OH was produced by the photolysis of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as shown in the following reactions:


                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math id="M113" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Relative to other OH precursors, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a low Henry's law constant (15 M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated by theory) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.33"/>. During experiments
with high relative humidity (RH), unlike other OH precursors, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not expected to
enhance OH production in the particle phase beyond atmospherically relevant
levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d1e2967">Temperature and RH were measured using a Vaisala HMM211
probe. NO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were monitored using a Teledyne <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer (T200).
Because the Teledyne <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> monitor detects <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, organic nitrates, and
other <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compounds as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, only initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements can be
constrained with this instrument. For some experiments, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also
monitored using a luminol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and acyl peroxynitrate analyzer developed by
Fitz Aerometric Technologies. This instrument separates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via
chromatography at room temperature using a deactivated DB-5 column. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
then reacts with luminol to produce a chemiluminescence response
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.34"/>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by the luminol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and acyl
peroxynitrate analyzer compares reasonably well with the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from the kinetic model (Fig. S3 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e3131">A gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID; HP 6890N,
column HP-Plot-Q) was used to measure the decay of isoprene and methacrolein.
The GC-FID was calibrated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–60 ppm of isoprene or methacrolein
generated from analytical standards (Aldrich 95 %–99 % purity) and
cross-calibrated by Fourier transform infrared absorption (FT-IR)
spectroscopy (pathlength 19 cm) using the absorption cross sections measured
by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) for isoprene or methacrolein
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.35"/>. Linearity in the GC-FID calibration was determined to an
error of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % across a factor of 150 in dilution.</p>
      <p id="d1e3157">Aerosol organic and inorganic composition was recorded in situ using a
high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-AMS; Aerodyne
Research, Inc.). The HR-AMS switched every 1 min between the high-resolution
W mode and the lower-resolution, higher-sensitivity V mode. The data were
analyzed with Igor Pro (Wave Metrics, Inc.), utilizing the Squirrel 1.56D and
PIKA 1.15D analysis toolkits (from
<uri>http://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/ToFAMSResources/ToFSoftware/index.html</uri>, last access: 14 April 2017).
In-line filter runs conducted prior to each experiment were used to correct
for air interferences <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.36"/>. Bulk SOA elemental composition was
calculated following the methods and recommendations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.37"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.38"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3172">Aerosol volume and number concentration were monitored using a differential
mobility analyzer (DMA; TSI 3081 column) coupled with a condensation particle
counter (CPC; TSI 3010), which measures all particles with a diameter between
20 and 800 nm. The voltage scan used by the DMA was 1 min hold at 15 V, 4 min
increase to 9850 V, 1 min hold at 9850 V, and 0.5 min decrease back to 15 V.
Only the up-scan data were used for the analysis. The longer up-scan and hold
times used here, compared to previous studies (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.39"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="altparen.40"/>), reduced biases caused by mixing in the CPC. Such CPC
mixing biases particularly impact the measurement of large particles, which
are important in SOA yield experiments as they contribute significantly to
the total SOA volume.</p>
      <p id="d1e3182">The DMA data analysis includes an improved data inversion and a correction
for particle mixing in the condensation particle counter, which influences
the CPC response time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.41"/>. The inversion technique is
applicable only to particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm. Particle concentration between
600 and 800 nm was calculated assuming a nonlinear least squares lognormal fit
applied to particles from 400 to 600 nm. For experiments with no initial seed
aerosol, the inversion inconsistently determined the presence of particles
beyond 400 nm. Such large particles are unlikely to be the result of
nucleation and more likely to represent an artifact of the inversion; thus,
only particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm were used in the analysis of these experiments.
Corrections to the DMA data for coagulation and particle wall loss are
addressed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7261?><p id="d1e3210">Isoprene oxidation products were measured using a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical
ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS), which utilizes a custom-modified triple
quadrupole mass analyzer (Varian 1200) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.42"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
interacts with a gas-phase compound (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) to form a complex that is detected at
the molecular weight of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or, in some cases, to fragment. Various
fragmentation products can form as explained in previous work (e.g.,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="altparen.43"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="altparen.44"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="altparen.45"/>). In this
work, the CIMS results are only used to identify the presence of highly
functionalized organic nitrates and not for quantification, so only signals
from the complex (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and not from fragmentation
are reported.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Kinetic mechanism</title>
      <p id="d1e3307">All relevant reactions included in the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM) v3.3.1
(<uri>http://mcm.leeds.ac.uk/MCM</uri>, last access: 7 September 2018) were used in the current kinetic model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx71" id="paren.46"/>. Isoprene oxidation chemistry was recently
updated in MCM v3.3.1 by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.47"/>. Additional reactions included in
the kinetic model but not in MCM v3.3.1 are listed in Table S1. Updates
include inorganic reactions needed for chamber studies with large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis) and small changes to the isoprene
chemistry based largely on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.48"/> and consistent with Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. As shown in Table S1, these
updates include the first-generation isoprene hydroxy nitrate yields, the
rates and branching ratios for the oxidation of the first-generation isoprene
hydroxy nitrates, and the HMML yield from the MPAN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH reaction. In some
cases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-isoprene hydroxy alkoxy radicals in MCM v3.3.1 decompose
through peroxy radical H shifts directly to products that would not form
under the high-NO conditions in this work. For simplicity, we change these
reactions, so that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-isoprene hydroxy alkoxy radicals form unity
yields of hydroxy aldehydes. BOXMOX, a box-model software package using the
Kinetic PreProcessor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.49"/>, was used to simulate the chamber
experiments. As listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, the kinetic model was
initialized for each experiment with the measured initial concentration of
VOC, NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as the measured average temperature
and relative humidity.</p>
      <p id="d1e3402">Saturation mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the fraction of each compound in the
particle phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 13, 26, and 32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C are estimated
for relevant organic nitrates and dinitrates produced in MCM v3.3.1 and
listed in Table S2. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated with the vapor pressure estimated from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx50" id="text.50"/> using the online calculator located at
<uri>http://www.aim.env.uea.ac.uk/aim/ddbst/pcalc_main.php</uri> (last access: 1 March 2019).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and gas-particle
equilibrium theory as further explained in Sect. S1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.51"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3479"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>As shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, the inferred OH concentration was larger in
experiments with higher temperatures. Because the temperature dependence of
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption cross section and quantum yield are not well
established, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis rate constant was calculated from the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decay curve as measured by the GC-FID. Unfortunately, the GC-FID
sensitivity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was low, so only the 2MGA experiments produced a
sufficiently large signal for this approach. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis
rate constant from experiments M1–M3, M4, M5, and M6–M8 were used for dry
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), dry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), dry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
humid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) experiments, respectively.
This approach accurately captured the reaction of isoprene and methacrolein
with OH in all experiments (Figs. S1 and S2), which implies that the
simulated OH in the kinetic model is reasonably accurate even over varying
temperature. All other photolysis rate constants are calculated from the
absorption cross sections and quantum yields reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.52"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.53"/>. Additionally, the kinetic model captures NO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reasonably well for both the LV and 2MGA pathway experiments (Fig. S3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e3775">First, corrections for particle coagulation and particle wall deposition,
which are required for accurate calculation of SOA yields, are addressed
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>). Next, SOA produced from the LV (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>) and 2MGA (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>)
pathways is discussed.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Corrections for particle coagulation and particle wall deposition</title>
      <p id="d1e3791">Past studies reporting particle wall deposition coefficients apply the
measured particle number decay rate in each size bin to produce a wall
deposition coefficient, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), that is a function of particle
size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.54"/>. Because larger seed particle number and
surface area concentrations were used in these experiments, corrections to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that account for coagulation are needed
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.55"/>. The current work uses an approach similar to that
of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.56"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.57"/> with updates to account for
electrostatic charges on the chamber walls as described by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.58"/>. To reduce the experimental uncertainty associated with
these processes, particle wall deposition was calculated during each
experiment. This approach accounted for the day-to-day fluctuations in
particle coagulation processes, chamber wall charging, and chamber mixing. We
summarize these approaches and describe any changes required for this
analysis in Sect. S2 of the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e3863">Four particle wall loss experiments were performed under dry conditions (RH
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) at varying seed surface areas<?pagebreak page7262?> as controls to verify the technique used
to correct for particle wall loss, particle coagulation, and electrostatic
charges on the chamber walls. These particle wall deposition experiments were
performed by injecting ammonium sulfate seed into the chamber, as described
in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>. Mixing air was added, and the ammonium
sulfate seed aerosol was monitored in the dark chamber for at least 14 h.
These controls confirmed that the wall loss correction calculated over the
first 3.5 h could be extrapolated for an additional 10 h. Beyond 10 h, the
wall loss correction was more uncertain, so only results from the first 10 h
of each experiment are reported. The percent change between the aerosol
volume over 10 h and the aerosol volume at the start of the control
experiment was between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for all dry control experiments (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3902">Percent change between the corrected aerosol volume over 10 h and
the corrected aerosol volume at the start of photooxidation (60 min
averages) for the following particle wall deposition control experiments: C1
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; black dot), C2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">109</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; blue
dot), C3 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">183</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; red dot), and C4 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">375</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; cyan dot), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
initial corrected particle volume.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7255/2019/acp-19-7255-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4085">The results of these control experiments verified the robustness of the
correction technique and provided an estimate for the uncertainty. The
reported uncertainty for the particle wall deposition correction is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the corrected aerosol volume at the start of photooxidation.
Experiments with larger seed aerosol volumes exhibit larger uncertainty in
the reported SOA yield. However, such experiments are necessary despite the
extra uncertainty, as larger seed surface areas minimize low biases in SOA
yields due to vapor wall deposition of low-volatility compounds
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.59"/>. For experiments with no initial seed aerosol,
particle wall loss corrections were applied assuming the particles coagulated
and deposited similarly to the lowest aerosol loading control experiment
(C1). No uncertainty for the particle wall deposition correction was added to
these experiments because the uncertainty derived here is applicable only to
experiments with initial seed aerosol.</p>
      <p id="d1e4111"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>In experiments C1–C4, D1–D9, and M1–M8, electrostatic charges on the chamber
walls were inferred to be present. After these experiments were completed,
new Teflon chambers were acquired with negligible electrostatic charges on
the chamber walls <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.60"/> likely due to their smaller volume (18 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Three additional new experiments (D10, D11, and M9) were completed
using one of these new Teflon chambers to confirm that we had accurately
corrected for the chamber wall charging effects. For the LV pathway
experiments (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>), results for the new
experiments were quite similar and within uncertainties of the old
experiments. The new 2MGA pathway experiment produced slightly lower SOA
yields than the old experiments but not necessarily because of the chamber
wall charging corrections as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4131">Five control experiments were also performed under humid conditions. The DMA
cannot measure hydrated particles owing to arcing in the DMA column at high
RH. Thus, a Nafion dryer was used to dry particles before measurement. For
the coagulation correction, the volume of the hydrated seed was calculated
based on the dry DMA particle measurement, the RH in the chamber, and the
hygroscopic growth curve for ammonium sulfate measured by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="text.61"/>. The percent change for the aerosol volume was higher and
less consistent in the humid control experiments than in the dry control
experiments. Also, the optimized value of the electric field (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) was
higher in many of the humid experiments than in the dry experiments (Sect. S2, Table S3). Increased humidity is expected to decrease the electrostatic
charges on the chamber walls (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="altparen.62"/>), but the inferred
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests the opposite. Possibly, the humidifying process enhanced
the electrostatic charges on the chamber walls or nitric acid, which is
enhanced in the particle phase in the humid experiments under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions, impacts the coagulation or particle wall loss processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e4171">The aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) data confirm that during the humid experiments, nitric acid
partitioned to the particle phase and that organic aerosol was produced
during photooxidation for all experiments. Nevertheless, the particle wall
loss corrected volume measured by the DMA decayed below zero during
photooxidation in the humid experiments. Potentially, this DMA volume decay
suggests that nitric acid present in the particle phase changes the particle
coagulation or wall loss characteristics. Even if we understood the impact of
nitric acid on the particle coagulation or wall loss corrections, assessing
how much of the particle growth is due to nitric acid versus organics would
be difficult with the DMA, which measures only total aerosol volume and not
composition. Further chamber characterization is required in order to assess
isoprene SOA yields measured by the DMA from humid experiments under
high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. Thus, in this work, only the AMS results will be
discussed for the humid experiments and SOA yields are only reported for
experiments performed under dry conditions (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). None<?pagebreak page7263?> of the
dry experiments exhibited the odd behavior observed in the humid experiments,
and the AMS results confirm that under dry conditions minimal nitric acid
partitioned to the aerosols (Fig. S10). For the dry experiments, the
uncertainties are characterized well by the dry control experiments presented
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>SOA formation from  the LV  pathway</title>
      <p id="d1e4197">The SOA mass yields from isoprene for all LV pathway experiments (i.e.,
experiments targeting low-volatility compounds) are shown in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. To convert aerosol
volume measured by the DMA to aerosol mass, a density of 1.4 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was
assumed, consistent with past work
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.63"/>. The kinetic mechanism
suggests that in all experiments targeting the LV pathway, the formation of HMML
was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb even in experiments performed under cold conditions
(13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). The AMS results also confirm that 2-MGA and its oligomers are
not present in the LV pathway experiments (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS2"/>). Thus, the kinetic mechanism and AMS results
verify that the experimental design correctly separates the two chemical
regimes and 2-MGA is not substantially adding to the aerosol mass in the LV
pathway experiments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4243">SOA mass yield (20 min averages) as measured by the DMA assuming a
density of 1.4 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for all LV pathway experiments: seed surface
area (SA) – D1 (SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; blue dot), D2
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1170 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; magenta dot), D3
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; green dot), and D4
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5770 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; gray dot); temperature – D5
(13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; inverted cyan triangle) and D6 (32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; red triangle);
isoprene loading – D7 (initial isoprene 110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; yellow
square); and new chamber with less wall charging – D10
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1580 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, orange star) and D11
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4770 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; teal star).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7255/2019/acp-19-7255-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4524">SOA mass yield (60 min averages) as a function of initial seed
surface area for all LV pathway experiments. Colors represent time since
lights on in panel <bold>(a)</bold> and extent of isoprene reacted in
panel <bold>(b)</bold>. Marker size represents time since lights on. Uncertainty
is shown in black lines as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>. Marker
types indicate 25–26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (dot), 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(inverted triangle), 32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(triangle), lower loadings of
isoprene (square), and new chamber with less wall charging
(star).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7255/2019/acp-19-7255-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page7264?><p id="d1e4570"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Aerosol growth in the absence of seed aerosols was not observed in the LV
pathway experiments (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). As expected, SOA formed
from gas–particle partitioning in the LV pathway exhibited a large dependence
on seed surface area (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). Without sufficient
seed aerosol, low-volatility nitrates partition primarily to the chamber
walls, and the resulting SOA yields are biased low. With the addition of
inorganic seed aerosol like ammonium sulfate, vapor species are expected to
partition more to particles relative to the chamber wall <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.64"/>.
The gas-particle equilibrium is not expected to be dependent on the
concentration of inorganic seed aerosol but instead is dependent on the
concentration of organic aerosol. Depending on the saturation mass
concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as the concentration of organic aerosol rises, vapors are
present more in the particle phase relative to the gas phase
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.65"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the fraction of a compound expected to be in the
particle phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were estimated for a variety of organic
nitrates and dinitrates in MCM v3.3.1 at 13, 26, and 32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Table S2).</p>
      <p id="d1e4627">Similar to previous studies (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="altparen.66"/>), at a certain point
increased seed surface area no longer substantially impacts the SOA yield
(i.e., Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> after 2500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
This point will heavily depend on the system and the saturation mass
concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the SOA precursors. As shown in Table S2, the isoprene
SOA precursors are mostly classified as IVOCs and SVOCs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.67"/>.
Reaching a point where most of the vapors are in particles relative to the
chamber wall is expected for IVOCs and SVOCs, which have moderate vapor wall
losses in Teflon chambers especially under dry conditions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.68"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4682">As expected the isoprene dihydroxy dinitrates had the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at all temperatures. Based on the kinetic model, even
assuming all of the isoprene dihydroxy dinitrates exist in the
particle phase, the SOA formed would be much less than that detected in this
study (Fig. S4). This is likely caused by too low of a production of the
isoprene dihydroxy dinitrates and/or the importance of other SOA precursors.
There are many additional compounds largely produced from hydroxy aldehyde
oxidation or alkoxy [1,5]-H shifts (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C between 0.05 and 0.4 (Table S2). The vapor
pressures may be overpredicted for these specific compounds, but past
studies suggest that in general, vapor pressure estimation methods like
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx50" id="text.69"/> underpredict rather than overpredict
vapor pressure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.70"/>. From the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculations (Table S2), none
of the multifunctional organic nitrates are expected to be appreciably in
the particle phase. However, in a recent study, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.71"/> detected many
multifunctional organic nitrates in aerosols in the ambient atmosphere,
which has lower organic aerosol concentrations than chamber studies.
Possibly, MCM underpredicts the formation of these IVOC and SVOC products
(Fig. S4), such that even if only a fraction exists in the particle phase
relative to the gas phase, an appreciable mass of aerosol still forms and/or
these results suggest that volatility is not the only driver for aerosol
formation from the LV pathway. All of the multifunctional nitrates here with
estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C between 0.05 and 0.4 have at
least one hydroxy or aldehyde group (Table S2). Alcohols and aldehydes are
well known to combine in particles to produce hemiacetals, whose vapor
pressure is significantly lower than that of the initial reactants
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.72"/>. Several past studies have confirmed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
general, but not necessarily linearly, decreases the volatility of isoprene
SOA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx85 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.73"/>. This decrease in volatility is
likely due to accretion reactions. Whether the accretion reactions from
hemiacetal formation versus those from 2MGA oligomerization are responsible
for the decrease in volatility is yet unknown.</p>
      <p id="d1e4788">Differences in the SOA yield at 10 h of photooxidation by varying temperatures
(13–32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) lie within the experimental uncertainty. SOA forms earlier
(i.e. with less isoprene reacted) at 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C than at 26 or 32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at
comparable seed surface areas. This is consistent with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
estimated in Table S2 and the above explanation demonstrating the likelihood
of accretion reactions. Vapors that are only moderately in the particle phase
at 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.4) will exist more
appreciably in the particle phase at 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.8). From the above discussion, we expect that many of these compounds are
SOA precursors not based only on their volatility but also on their
potential to react in the particle phase to form lower-volatility products
such as hemiacetals. Thus, if accretion reactions are the main factor,
reducing temperature is expected to increase the rate of SOA production but
not necessarily to impact the overall SOA yield.</p>
      <p id="d1e4878"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.74"/> have also measured isoprene SOA formation under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions at varying temperatures. Under the high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions of their
study, SOA is produced from both the 2MGA and LV pathways combined. Similarly
to our study, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.75"/> do not find appreciable differences for
temperatures from 27 to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Contrary, to our work, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.76"/>
found that reducing the temperature to 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C increases the SOA yield by
a factor of 4. Unfortunately, there are no experiments between 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to determine whether this shift is exponential or linear, so
direct comparison of our results at 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is difficult. Under the
high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.77"/>, at colder temperatures MPAN
will be more stable and so more HMML will form, which produces more SOA.
Under this mixed regime, determining how much of the SOA increase is due to
the LV versus the 2MGA pathway for direct comparison to this study is
difficult. Additionally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.78"/> start with significantly more
isoprene than in our experiment, which enhances the concentration of organic
aerosol, which will increase the fraction of a compound in the particle phase
relative to the gas phase.</p>
      <p id="d1e4975">While vapor wall losses of LV compounds are expected to increase at colder
temperatures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.79"/>, the organic nitrate yields are
also expected to be enhanced under colder temperatures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.80"/>.
Thus, the effects of these two temperature-dependent processes might cancel each other out.
The increase in organic nitrate yield is expected to be moderate. For
example, a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % increase from 32 to 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is estimated for the
yield of isoprene hydroxy nitrates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.81"/>. The loss of vapors
to the walls could be much higher at colder temperatures, but this is hard to
constrain as vapor wall deposition is dependent on the compound itself and
the chamber used. The chamber used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.82"/> (90 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is larger
than our chamber (21 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Vapor wall losses are expected to be lower in
larger chambers,<?pagebreak page7265?> which have a lower chamber surface-area-to-volume ratio
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="paren.83"/>. Significant seed aerosol is added into our chamber to
reduce the influence of vapor wall deposition, but vapor wall deposition
could certainly explain some of the differences at cold temperatures between
our results and those from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.84"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5035">Consistent with past work (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx51" id="altparen.85"/>), aerosol from
the LV pathway is produced only after most of the isoprene is consumed,
implying that aerosol from the LV pathway largely forms from later-generation
chemistry (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). As shown in Fig. 4, generally,
SOA formation begins earlier (i.e., with less isoprene reacted) in
experiments with larger seed aerosol. This is consistent with vapors
partitioning more to particles relative to the chamber wall when seed aerosol
is enhanced. The extent to which later-generation products are oxidized
(i.e., the degree of oxidation) impacts the SOA yield as demonstrated by the
varying slope (i.e., SOA yield) during each experiment in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. We tested the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">isoprene</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio on the SOA yield.
Experiment D7 was performed with 40 ppb of isoprene compared to 55–60 ppb
used in the other experiments, while the OH precursor concentration was kept
constant. The kinetic model predicts that the production of important
gas-phase SOA precursors from the LV pathway (e.g., isoprene dihydroxy
dinitrates), when corrected for total isoprene reacted, is similar in
experiment D7 to the other experiments (Fig. S4). The empirical results are
consistent with these predictions. Although a lower isoprene loading
decreases the competition of isoprene with OH, other compounds also react
with OH quickly (e.g., NO). Under the conditions used in this study,
differences in isoprene loading are not expected to greatly influence the
isoprene SOA mass yield. However, detailed kinetic modeling of past
experimental conditions would be necessary to understand how the degree of
oxidation of later-generation products in this study compares to other
studies.</p>
      <p id="d1e5057">In summary, the results (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>) suggest that one
of the most important metrics for understanding the variability in SOA
production from the LV pathway in various chamber experiments may be the
initial seed surface area, instead of temperature or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">isoprene</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. Other
parameters such as humidity and seed composition may also be important for
SOA yields but were not tested in this study. Future experiments examining
SOA yields should report the initial seed surface area and use a sufficient
seed loading to reduce the impact of vapor wall deposition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>SOA formation from the 2MGA pathway</title>
      <p id="d1e5082">The SOA mass yields from methacrolein for all 2MGA pathway experiments (i.e.,
experiments targeting 2MGA and its oligomers) are shown in Figs.  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. Results from past
experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.86"/> have already demonstrated that fluctuations in
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio impact SOA formation through the production of MPAN. In
this work, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is kept as consistent as possible to isolate
other influences on SOA production. The kinetic model suggests that the
conditions for each experiment produce a consistent level of HMML (Fig. S4). Interestingly, because the experimental conditions heavily favored MPAN
formation, the level of OH available to react with MPAN became the limiting
reactant for aerosol formation in each experiment.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5124">SOA mass yield (20 min averages) as measured by the DMA assuming a
density of 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2MGA pathway experiments: seed
surface area (SA) – M1 (SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; blue dot), M2
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1640 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; magenta dot), and M3
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2260 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; green dot), temperature – M5
(13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; inverted cyan triangle) and M6 (32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; red triangle), and
new chamber with less wall charging – M9
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1910 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; orange
star).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7255/2019/acp-19-7255-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e5320">SOA mass yield (60 min averages) versus initial seed surface area
for all 2MGA pathway experiments. Colors represent time since lights
on <bold>(a)</bold> and extent of methacrolein reacted <bold>(b)</bold>. Marker size
represents time since lights on. Uncertainty is shown in black lines and
described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>. Markers represent 25–26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(dot), 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (inverted triangle),
32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (triangle), and new
chamber with less wall charging (star). Two experiments were performed at
nearly the same seed surface area. To enhance viewing, experiment M6
(32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; triangle) is shifted to the right by
40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7255/2019/acp-19-7255-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5404">Contrary to the LV pathway, SOA in the 2MGA pathway experiments does not
require seed particles to form. The process of SOA formation from these two
pathways is very different. Lactone SOA precursors may polymerize in the
presence of organics and water, which possibly explains why SOA from the 2MGA
pathway readily forms particles without significant seed surface area,
whereas in the LV pathway experiments volatility-based SOA formation results
in aerosol yields that are particularly impacted by vapor partitioning. For
the 2MGA pathway experiments, even though SOA formation occurred without
initial seed aerosol, larger initial seed loadings still enhanced the SOA
yield (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). Possibly, similar to the LV
pathway, larger seed surface areas limit vapor wall loss of HMML or its
oligomerization partners. Alternatively, the presence of higher ammonium
sulfate seed aerosol may also increase organosulfate formation, which could
impact SOA composition and yield.</p>
      <p id="d1e5409">Temperature was varied between 13 and 32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio used in this work was sufficiently high such that this temperature
change did not greatly influence MPAN or HMML formation (Fig. S4). Thus,
these experiments only<?pagebreak page7266?> test whether aerosol properties and SOA yields are
affected by temperature, as MPAN thermal decomposition is minimized. At the
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios used in this work, temperature does not impact SOA mass
yield beyond given uncertainties (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). Based on
known gas-phase chemistry, past studies (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="altparen.87"/>) with more
moderate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios than that used in this work are expected to measure
an enhanced SOA yield under colder temperatures due to a reduction in MPAN
thermal decomposition and thereby an increase in HMML formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e5472">HMML, based on volatility alone, would exist mostly in the gas phase, but
because HMML is very reactive (e.g., oligomerization or reaction with
inorganic ions in the particle phase), HMML quickly produces aerosol
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.88"/>. Based on HMML production simulated by the
kinetic mechanism under the conditions used in these experiments, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
SOA mass yield from methacrolein is expected purely from the mass contained
in HMML (molecular weight <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 102 g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. S4).
At first, the molecular weight of HMML itself is used because this is the
mass of the majority of the oligomer monomers. This represents about half of
the SOA mass yield (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured from the experiment performed with
the highest seed surface area. The rest of the aerosol is likely comprised of
inorganic or organic compounds that react with HMML in the particle phase.
For example, inorganic compounds such as water, nitrate, and sulfate can
react with HMML through ring-opening reactions to produce total methacrolein
SOA mass yields of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). Additionally, HMML can react with 2-MGA and other
organic compounds through oligomerization processes (e.g.,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.89"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="altparen.90"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx87" id="altparen.91"/>).
Some of these organic oligomerization reactions bring into the particle phase
additional organic compounds (e.g., organic acids) that ordinarily would
exist primarily in the gas phase (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). The details of
these particle-phase reactions are further discussed in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5561">In general, there is much greater variability in the SOA mass yields measured
from the 2MGA pathway than the LV pathway. The additional variability is only
partially explained by the initial seed surface area (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). Because the SOA yield is larger for experiments
in which less methacrolein is oxidized (Figs.  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b), potentially, the extent of methacrolein
oxidization contributes to this variability. The kinetic model suggests that
the formation of gas-phase HMML is similar for all of the experiments (Fig. S4), but potentially slight variations in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and/or OH
particularly near the end of each experiment are not well captured by the
model. The kinetic model used here only simulates gas-phase oxidation.
Chemistry occurring on surfaces such as the chamber walls or in the particle
phase may be especially important for capturing the variability in the 2MGA
pathway experiments. Considering that the 2MGA pathway experiments are very
susceptible to small differences in chamber conditions, regional and global
models should parameterize SOA formation from the 2MGA pathway through
gas-phase formation of HMML and subsequent particle-phase reactions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e5595">The gas-phase compounds measured by the CIMS (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS1"/>)
and aerosol composition measured by the AMS (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS2"/>) provide important insight into isoprene SOA
chemical composition formed from both the LV and 2MGA pathways. Additionally,
a comparison of the AMS and DMA results lends<?pagebreak page7267?> insight into possible biases in
the AMS measurements of organic aerosol in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS3"/>. The
SOA yields measured in this study are compared with past measurements in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS4"/>, and the atmospheric contribution of the LV
versus 2MGA pathways toward SOA formation from isoprene OH-initiated
oxidation under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions is estimated in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS5"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Specific low-volatility nitrates and dinitrates detected in the gas phase</title>
      <p id="d1e5627">Numerous nitrates and dinitrates are detected in the gas phase by the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CIMS (i.e., compounds highlighted in blue boxes in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Many of these nitrates have been identified in
previous studies (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="altparen.92"/>). Yields for the low-volatility
later-generation nitrates are either highly uncertain or unknown.
Quantification is difficult for these low-volatility compounds due to high
losses to sampling lines or chamber walls and lack of available standards.
One study, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.93"/>, was able to quantify the yield of dinitrates from
the first-generation isoprene hydroxy nitrate standards. Assuming a
sensitivity similar to the isoprene hydroxy nitrate standards,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.94"/> measured a dinitrate yield of 0.03–0.04 from OH-initiated
oxidation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-1-hydroxy,4-nitrate isomer.</p>
      <p id="d1e5665">Although most past studies have focused on dihydroxy dinitrates as the main
contributor to isoprene high-NO SOA, other low-volatility nitrates are likely
also important. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, the CIMS signals for the other
low-volatility nitrates are comparable or larger than the dihydroxy dinitrate
signal. The relative sensitivities for these compounds are unknown, but these
results suggest that detection and quantification of all low-volatility
dinitrates and nitrates is important. The peroxy radical formed from
OH-initiated oxidation of an isoprene hydroxy nitrate can undergo a 1,5 or
1,6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-hydroxy H shift to form a number of low-volatility nitrates that
would occur in the ambient atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.95"/>. The NO
concentrations are too high in these experiments for such shifts to occur.
However, similarly, certain isomers of the alkoxy radical, formed from
OH-initiated oxidation of a isoprene hydroxy nitrate, can undergo a 1,5
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-hydroxy H shift to form a dihydroxy carbonyl nitrate detected by the
CIMS at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (-) 264 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>).
Additionally, various low-volatility nitrates in the gas phase are detected,
which are potentially oxidation products from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-isoprene hydroxy
alkoxy radical as depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e5715">Normalized CIMS signal for known nitrates: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydroxy
nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (–) 232; blue circle), methyl vinyl ketone or methacrolein
nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (–) 234; red circle), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dihydroxy dinitrate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (–) 311; black filled circle) and unknown nitrates, which are postulated in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dihydroxy nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (–)
248; green filled circle), unknown (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (–) 262; magenta filled circle), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
dihydroxy carbonyl nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (–) 264; cyan filled circle). As indicated in the
legend, signals represented by filled circles are multiplied by
10.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7255/2019/acp-19-7255-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5844">Many multifunctional isoprene-derived organic nitrates have been detected in
ambient aerosol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.96"/>. Although these low-volatility nitrates and
dinitrates have low molar yields from isoprene OH-initiated oxidation, their
mass is substantially larger than isoprene and so their contribution to the
isoprene SOA mass yield is significant. The nitrate yield from straight-chain
hydrocarbons is reasonably well understood, but few experimental measurements
of the nitrate yield from highly oxidized compounds exist
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx83" id="paren.97"/>. Further measurements of the yield of these
low-volatility nitrates and dinitrates in the gas phase will be crucial for
a better understanding of isoprene SOA formation under high-NO conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Aerosol composition of high-NO isoprene SOA</title>
      <p id="d1e5861"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.98"/> determined that inorganic aerosol such as ammonium nitrate
or ammonium sulfate causes an interference on the AMS for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion
signal. Although this interference is small for ammonium sulfate aerosol
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="altparen.99"/>), a correction may be needed for experiments with
high initial seed aerosol loadings. Here organic signals from the AMS rise
when ammonium sulfate seed is injected into the chamber. We expect that this is
due to the same interferences described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.100"/> and not due to
contamination in ammonium sulfate solution or atomization technique. The
background organic signal caused by the ammonium sulfate is subtracted from
the overall results to produce Figs.  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>,
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e5904">High-resolution AMS organic mass spectra (averaged over 10 h of
photooxidation – the sulfate background) for experiment D3
(RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 %, panel <bold>a</bold>) and D9 (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 78 %,
panel <bold>b</bold>) in gray. Fragments are labeled as 2-MGA monomer or dimer
(cyan), esterification of 2-MGA with acids (red), isoprene epoxydiol
(IEPOX) tracers (dark green), and examples of organonitrate fragments –
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(purple).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7255/2019/acp-19-7255-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e5956">High-resolution AMS organic mass spectra (averaged over 10 h of
photooxidation – the sulfate background) for experiment M2
(RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 %, panel <bold>a</bold>) and M8 (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 81 %,
panel <bold>b</bold>) in gray. Fragments are labeled as 2-MGA monomer or dimer
(cyan), esterification of 2-MGA with acids (red), examples of
organosulfate fragments (dark green), and examples of organonitrate
fragments – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(purple).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7255/2019/acp-19-7255-2019-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e6009">Total organic mass (20 min averages) as measured by the AMS for LV
pathway experiments <bold>(a)</bold>: seed surface area (SA) – D1
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; blue dot) and D3
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; green dot); temperature – D5
(13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; inverted cyan triangle) and D6 (32  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; red triangle); and
new chamber with less wall charging – D10
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1580 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; orange star) and D11
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4770 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; teal star). Total organic mass as measured by the AMS for 2MGA pathway
experiments <bold>(b)</bold>: seed surface area – M1
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; blue dot) and M2
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1640 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; magenta dot); temperature – M4
(13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; inverted cyan triangle) and M5 (32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; red triangle); and
new chamber with less wall charging – M9
(SA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1910 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; orange
star).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7255/2019/acp-19-7255-2019-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page7268?><p id="d1e6317">The AMS spectra from the LV pathway confirm that SOA formed from the LV
pathway is not dominated by 2-MGA and its oligomers (cyan and red bars in
Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> and S11). This is an important confirmation
that isoprene SOA formed from the 2MGA and LV pathways are distinct. A small
yield of isoprene epoxydiol (IEPOX) is produced from OH-initiated oxidation
of isoprene hydroxy nitrates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.101"/>, and IEPOX SOA can be formed
when particle liquid water is present <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.102"/>. NO levels remained
high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb) throughout all LV pathway experiments (Fig. S3), ensuring
that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fate in these experiments was always <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. AMS
fragments associated with IEPOX, which were identified by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.103"/>,
are slightly enhanced under humid conditions in the LV pathway experiments
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). Some examples of organonitrate fragments
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are highlighted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>. Some
of these organonitrate fragments are enhanced under humid conditions (e.g.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In general, the AMS spectra are similar between all LV pathway
conditions (i.e. varied humidity – Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>; varied
temperature – Fig. S11).</p>
      <p id="d1e6414">Prominent peaks in the AMS spectra from the 2MGA pathway clearly indicate
that under dry conditions aerosol is comprised of various oligomerization
products as mechanistically summarized in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. These
oligomerization processes include 2-MGA oligomerization with HMML (cyan bars
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a) and, possibly, esterification of 2-MGA
with carboxylic acids including formic, acetic, and pyruvic acids (red bars
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a), which yield products that have been
detected in numerous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx87" id="paren.104"/>. Based on
the AMS spectra, 2-MGA oligomerization appears to be more dominant without
the presence of ammonium sulfate seed aerosol (Fig. S13). Varying
temperature from 13 to 32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C does not appear to substantially change the
extent of 2-MGA oligomerization (Fig. S14).</p>
      <p id="d1e6435">Past studies have determined that HMML reaction with 2-MGA to form oligomers
decreases under humid conditions, while HMML ring-opening reactions with water
and inorganic ions to form organic nitrates and organic sulfates increase
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.105"/>. Consistent with these past studies,
the 2-MGA oligomer fragments on the AMS (cyan and red) are no longer
prominent signals for all humid experiments (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>
and S12). 2-MGA oligomer fragments are not substantially different at
47 %, 67 %, or 81 % RH, suggesting that the HMML oligomerization processes
are impeded as soon as aerosol particles become deliquesced. Because isoprene
is mostly emitted in regions with relatively high humidity, in the ambient
atmosphere, HMML will more likely react with water and<?pagebreak page7269?> inorganic ions than
undergo the various organic oligomerization reactions summarized in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Comparison of AMS and DMA results</title>
      <p id="d1e6453">Based on the DMA measurements when assuming the same density, the SOA mass
produced from the 2MGA pathway experiments is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> times higher in
magnitude than that from the LV pathway experiments (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). However, the AMS
results (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>) suggest that the SOA mass produced from
the 2MGA pathway experiments is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 times larger than that from the LV
pathway experiments. This implies that the collection efficiency (CE) and/or
the ionization efficiency of the AMS is quite different between these two
regimes. Because the AMS is significantly more sensitive to aerosol formed
from the 2MGA pathway, and not to SOA formed from the LV pathway, even
ambient organic aerosol measurements have the potential to be impacted.
Understanding whether the AMS is systematically underestimating organic
aerosol from organic nitrates and dinitrates in general, or if this is only
relevant to the isoprene system is crucial as the AMS is used throughout the
world to quantify organic aerosol. Moreover, ambient measurements over the
isoprene-rich southeastern United States of particulate organic nitrates
measured by the AMS are a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than those measured by the
thermal dissociation laser-induced fluorescence instrument (TD-LIF)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.106"/>. The relative CE differences between the LV and 2MGA pathways
in this study and these field campaign results suggest that further AMS
calibration of organic nitrates is necessary.</p>
      <p id="d1e6493">In this work, a CE of 0.5 is assumed for both regimes consistent with past
work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.107"/>. The exact CE is not relevant as no mass yields are
reported here from the AMS. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.108"/> determined that the CE could
be estimated based on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio for all experiments (2MGA and LV) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is where the CE vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curve plateaus at 0.2. Thus, the CE vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
relationship developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.109"/> is not able to explain the
large difference in AMS sensitivity between aerosol formed from the LV and
2MGA pathways.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e6591">Reported SOA mass yields and chamber conditions for isoprene and
methacrolein OH-initiated oxidation under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Oxidant</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[VOC]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">[NO]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Light</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">[AS]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Temp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">RH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">SOA yield</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(fraction)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col10">Isoprene </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.111"/><inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1610–1680</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">630</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">UV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">29.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.002–0.028</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.112"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HONO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25–500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">75–138</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">98–165</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">UV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10–25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">40–50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.009–0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.113"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">180–2500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0–700</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">40–806</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.002–0.053</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="author.114"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1600</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">406–485</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7–69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">UV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.1–27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.003–0.018<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="year.115"/>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.116"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HONO or</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33–523</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">259–316</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">510–859</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">UV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11–19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">20–22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9–11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.031–0.074</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.117"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HONO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">81–286<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">518–591</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">374–434</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">UV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11–14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">NR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.006–0.015</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.118"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">137</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">400–790</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">138–253</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1–9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10–30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">281–303</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">15–88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.007–0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.119"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">600</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">UV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">22–26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="text.120"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">101–115</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">338–738</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">UV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.015–0.085</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="author.121"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">439–846</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14–143</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0–16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16–24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.001–0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="year.122"/>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HONO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.123"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">250</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">UV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.1–0.41</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col10">Methacrolein </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.124"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HONO or</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20–285</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">164–725</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">365–799</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">UV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11–16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">20–22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9–11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.019–0.392</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="author.125"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">396–927</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19–123</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4–100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0–15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">19–24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.005–0.042</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="year.126"/>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HONO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e6605">CV: chamber volume. Acronyms are defined as follows:
NR – not reported; UV – ultraviolet lights; N – natural; X – xenon arc lamps; AS – ammonium sulfate seed aerosol<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>volume.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Chamber was operated in dynamic mode (residence
time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 h). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Ammonium sulfate was injected throughout the
experiment to generate the lower limit of initial seed<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>aerosol.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was added in some experiments to generate the upper limit of
initial seed aerosol. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Secondary organic carbon is converted to SOA using factor
(2.47) reported in<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.110"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> VOC reacted was
reported and tabulated instead of VOC initial.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>Comparison to previously reported SOA yields</title>
      <p id="d1e7812">SOA mass yields reported from past environmental chamber studies of
OH-initiated oxidation of isoprene under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions vary over the
range of 0.001–0.41 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.127"/>, suggesting isoprene SOA
yields are highly dependent on chamber conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.128"/>. In
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, past reported SOA mass yields are summarized along
with the chamber conditions for both isoprene and methacrolein OH-initiated
oxidation under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. Only experiments that explicitly
measure an SOA mass yield are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. Overall, our
results suggest that the initial seed surface area has the greatest impact on
SOA yield. Unfortunately, the initial seed surface area was not commonly
reported in past studies. The closest metric is aerosol volume, which can
roughly be used to understand differences.</p>
      <p id="d1e7848">As shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, the range for isoprene SOA yields under
high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions even from the two most recent studies at comparable
temperatures spans over an order of magnitude (0.004 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="altparen.129"/>, and 0.1 at 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="altparen.130"/>). Our results are most consistent with those of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.131"/>. As shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, a variety of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
regimes (i.e., non-consistent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios) are all labeled as
high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in these past studies. Each study likely produces SOA in varying
degrees from the LV and 2MGA pathways, which greatly complicates direct
comparison between these past studies. By varying a large number of
conditions and completely separating SOA production between the 2MGA and LV
pathways, our results lend insight into the variation in these past
experiments.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7270?><p id="d1e7942">Many of the past SOA yield measurements were performed with no seed aerosol.
Consistent with past results, when no seed aerosol was injected into the
chamber (experiments D1 and M1), the SOA mass yield for the LV pathway (0
from isoprene) and 2MGA pathway (0.1 from methacrolein) were quite low. Past
experiments performed with no seed aerosol only measured SOA from the
2MGA pathway, which is highly dependent on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.132"/>, which varied greatly between these past studies.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.133"/>, who measured high SOA yields (0.1 at 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) in
unseeded experiments, are the exception. Possibly, the larger chamber volume
(90 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.134"/> compared to most studies listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> reduced vapor wall losses and contributed to the enhanced
SOA yield. However, other chamber characteristics might also be important
because <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.135"/> measured quite low isoprene SOA yields (0.007–0.03)
using a chamber larger than the one used in the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.136"/> study.</p>
      <p id="d1e7996">While the zero or low seed aerosol loading experiments in this study
generally compare well with the past, SOA yields measured here using higher
initial seed surface areas are substantially greater than most studies,
especially for the LV pathway. The SOA yield from the LV pathway is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study, while past isoprene SOA yields are largely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the exception of studies optimizing for high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.137"/> or mixed regimes – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.138"/>. The SOA yield from the LV pathway in this work is even larger
than the SOA yield from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.139"/> (0.1 at 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), which
includes SOA from both the LV and 2MGA pathways. Possibly the larger chamber
volume used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.140"/> reduces vapor wall losses but not to the
extent that enhanced seed surface area does in this work. The higher yields
measured in this study are not unexpected given that recent publications have
recognized the importance of using high initial seed surface areas when
measuring SOA yields to reduce the impact of vapor wall deposition (e.g.,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="altparen.141"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="altparen.142"/>). The methacrolein SOA yields measured
in this study from the 2MGA pathway are comparable to those measured by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.143"/> but larger than those measured by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.144"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7271?><p id="d1e8095"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.145"/> measured low isoprene (0.001–0.01) and methacrolein
(0.005–0.042) SOA mass yields and proposed that these lower yields were due
to using xenon arc lamps as a light source, which are more representative of
natural sunlight than the UV lamps used here and in most other studies.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.146"/> also used xenon arc lamps and reported low yields.
However, both of these studies used chambers with moderate to low chamber
volumes (27–4.2 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) unlike the chamber used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.147"/> and low
levels of initial seed aerosol (0–16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) unlike this work,
which could also cause this low bias. Additionally, the stainless steel
chamber used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.148"/> may have higher vapor wall losses than
the Teflon chambers used in other studies. Further work is necessary to
understand how vapor wall losses compare across different types of
environmental chambers.</p>
      <p id="d1e8148">As discussed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.149"/>, isoprene SOA forms mostly from oxidation
of second and later-generation products <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.150"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.
Towards the end of the experiment, SOA continues to grows even when isoprene
is no longer reacting (e.g., the characteristic hook in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). Differences in the level of oxidation of
second and later-generation products could also explain some of
the discrepancies between our results and past results. The isoprene SOA mass
yields from the LV pathway are particularly sensitive to the extent of
oxidation. More studies measuring the gas-phase yields and formation
processes of low-volatility nitrates and dinitrates will be critical for
further understanding isoprene SOA.</p>
      <p id="d1e8161">Many of the previous studies listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> report the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio when comparing experiments. A more useful metric is
understanding the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fate and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime. Simply injecting NO and/or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and reporting the initial concentrations are not sufficient to confirm
that SOA was dominantly produced from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel or in the case
of HMML formation from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel. For example, if NO
decreases to zero before the end of the experiment, SOA has formed in a mixed
regime; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions dominate in the beginning and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reactions dominate at the end. If large initial VOC loadings are used in the
beginning of the experiment without comparable increases in NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions may become dominant.</p>
      <p id="d1e8296">Experiments here are specifically designed to test two different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fates, and the kinetic mechanism is used to confirm the fate of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
In the LV pathway experiments, high NO levels are maintained such that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio remains <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the entire experiment, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominantly and consistently across the experiments reacts with NO. In the
2MGA pathway experiments, high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are used such that the acyl
radical derived from methacrolein dominantly and consistently across
experiments reacts with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. By controlling for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fate, the
effects of temperature, seed surface area, and relative humidity on SOA
formation become easier to resolve. The design of future experiments should
optimize and report the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fate for which the experiment was designed, in
addition to key reaction parameters such as seed surface area, rather than
simply reporting an initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS5">
  <label>5.5</label><title>Estimating the atmospheric contribution of the LV versus 2MGA pathways</title>
      <p id="d1e8422">This work was not only designed to independently study SOA formation from the
two high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> regimes (the 2MGA and LV pathways) but also to suggest
alternative methods for parameterizing isoprene SOA under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions in regional and global models. Because obtaining constant
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios similar to the ambient atmosphere is near impossible for a
chamber study (e.g., temporal variation in Fig. S3), creating isoprene SOA
parameterizations based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio that realistically extrapolate to
the ambient atmosphere is not realistic. Instead, this work highlights a
potential alternative. Aerosol from the 2MGA pathway could be incorporated
directly from gas-phase HMML formation, and aerosol from the LV pathway could
be included either from the formation of surrogate compounds such as isoprene
dihydroxy dinitrates or with a volatility basis set scheme. By treating the
SOA from these two independent regimes separately, this study sets up the
experimental basis for such an approach.</p>
      <p id="d1e8477">In this study, direct comparison of the results from the 2MGA and LV pathways
is difficult due to the difference in the extent of oxidation between the two
regimes caused by the use of different VOC precursors and the variation in OH
levels (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). Thus, the kinetic model is used here to
estimate the contribution of each pathway to the total under consistent
oxidant levels. A detailed global modeling study is needed to precisely
capture the contribution of the LV versus the 2MGA pathways toward SOA
formation from isoprene OH-initiated oxidation under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions.
However, in order to demonstrate the significance of the new isoprene SOA
yield from the LV pathway measured in this work, we roughly approximate the
contribution of each pathway under typical atmospheric conditions. We use the
same kinetic mechanism described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> but hold
the following constant: RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 %; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 298 K; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 ppb; NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 ppb; isoprene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 ppb; OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; CO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 135 ppb; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 37 ppb; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 ppt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.151"/>. Then
gas-phase HMML and the gas-phase dinitrate SOA precursors are simulated as
done for the experimental results in Fig. S4.</p>
      <p id="d1e8626">To estimate the aerosol contribution from the LV pathway, we assume that SOA
production from the LV pathway scales with the production of isoprene
dihydroxy dinitrates. Organic aerosol concentrations are higher in chamber
experiments than the ambient atmosphere. By using low levels of VOC
precursors compared to previous studies, this study attempts to reduce the
organic aerosol concentrations to produce results more relevant to the
ambient atmosphere. However, due to limitations in the DMA sensitivity,
reducing the organic aerosol concentrations further to ambient levels is not
possible. The ratio of the measured SOA yield
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>) versus the simulated gas-phase dihydroxy
dinitrate SOA precursor yield (Fig. S4) is about 5. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
decreased by a factor of 2 for the dihydroxy dinitrates when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is reduced from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the chamber to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> measured in the southeast US <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.152"/>.
Thus, we multiply the dihydroxy dinitrate SOA precursors by 2.5 and we
convert to mass by multiplying by the molecular weight of dihydroxy
dinitrate. MCM v3.3.1 assumes a nitrate yield of<?pagebreak page7272?> 0.087–0.104 from NO
reacting with the peroxy radical derived from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">isoprene</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydroxy
nitrate. Low-volatility nitrates such as dihydroxy hydroperoxy nitrates form
when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reacts with the peroxy radical derived from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">isoprene</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydroxy nitrate. Such products would not form in the chamber
conditions used in this work, where NO levels remained above 100 ppb, but
would form in the ambient atmosphere. Considering these low-volatility
species from mixed chemical regimes would further increase the SOA mass
generated from the LV pathway.</p>
      <p id="d1e8754">For the 2MGA pathway, we convert to mass by multiplying gas-phase HMML by the
molecular weight of 2-MGA (120 g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), 2-MGA nitrate (165 g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
2-MGA sulfate (200 g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which are the expected condensed-phase products
under the high humidity levels in the atmosphere. Laboratory studies confirm
that 2-MGA forms under humid conditions and some of the 2-MGA partitions to
the gas phase as expected based on its volatility <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.153"/>. For
simplicity, we assume most of the HMML forms 2-MGA nitrate and 2-MGA sulfate but acknowledge that further experimental and modeling studies are needed to fully
understand HMML and 2-MGA aqueous phase chemistry.</p>
      <p id="d1e8797">Then based on the gas-phase SOA precursor distribution from the kinetic model
and assumptions above, under typical atmospheric conditions the fraction of
the total SOA mass from isoprene OH-initiated oxidation under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the LV pathway and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the 2MGA
pathway. This assumes that the dihydroxy dinitrates are valid surrogates for
the isoprene SOA. Considering that many multifunctional isoprene-derived organic
nitrates have been detected in ambient aerosol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.154"/>, all SOA
precursors in Table S2 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C are
combined and converted to mass. Extrapolating these to ambient organic
aerosol concentrations is more difficult because these compounds are more
likely to exist in the particle phase because of accretion reactions and not
volatility. When these products are assumed to exist entirely in the
particle phase and no factor is applied to correct for differences in organic
aerosol concentration or for these products only representing about one-third of
the isoprene SOA yield measured in this study (Fig. S4), the LV pathway is
estimated to contribute to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the SOA formed under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e8880">Thus, based on the simple calculations summarized above, the LV pathway may
produce moderately more SOA mass than the 2MGA pathway in the atmosphere and
consequently deserves equal attention. The conditions chosen here represent
average atmospheric conditions around noon as measured during the Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) field
campaign, which occurred in the isoprene-rich southeastern United States
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.155"/>. A more complete assessment using
global and regional modeling is needed to more definitively determine the
fraction of SOA formed via the LV versus 2MGA pathways as location, time of
day, season, ambient aerosol concentration, and composition, etc. will all
impact the amount of SOA formed from each pathway. Additional studies
addressing organic nitrate hydrolysis and aerosol acidity are also necessary
to fully understand the relative impact of the two pathways on SOA formation.
Additionally, the kinetic model used in this work only estimates gas-phase
potential SOA precursors. Future analysis using a more complex model that
explicitly simulates both the gas and particle phases would be useful for
extrapolating the SOA yields measured here to the ambient atmosphere, which
typically has lower organic aerosol concentrations than chamber experiments.
This would need to be combined with additional analysis of the chemical
constituents in the particle phase. From past work
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx85 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.156"/> demonstrating that isoprene-derived
SOA under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions is lower in volatility than that derived
under low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values estimated in this work (Table S2), accretion reactions appear to be important even in the LV pathway
experiments. The degree to which accretion reactions occur in the LV pathway
experiments to form even lower-volatility products is quite uncertain and
will greatly impact future analysis on how best to extrapolate isoprene SOA
yields measured in chambers to the ambient atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e8931">SOA from OH-initiated isoprene oxidation under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions forms
from two major pathways: (1) low-volatility nitrates and dinitrates (LV
pathway) and (2) 2-methyl glyceric acid and its oligomers (2MGA pathway).
These SOA production pathways respond differently to experimental conditions,
so this work examines the SOA yields from these two pathways independently.
Results suggest that low-volatility nitrates and dinitrates produce
significantly more aerosol than previously thought, with the isoprene SOA mass
yield from the LV pathway being <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Sufficient initial seed aerosol is
necessary to reduce the impact of vapor wall losses of low-volatility
compounds and accurately measure the entire SOA mass yield. Even though
previous studies have assumed that isoprene high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA largely forms
from 2-MGA and its oligomers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx87" id="paren.157"/>, results
from this study confirm that low-volatility compounds are also important for
isoprene SOA formed under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. The fate of isoprene's
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and the environmental conditions will determine which
pathways are active in the atmosphere at a certain time and location.</p>
      <p id="d1e8992">Under dry conditions, substantial amounts of SOA form from HMML reaction with
2-MGA to produce oligomers. The AMS results confirm that under humid
conditions, these low-volatility oligomers are diminished in favor of
higher-volatility monomer formation (and potentially subsequent
volatilization of 2-MGA) to reduce the SOA mass. Thus, under atmospherically
relevant humid conditions, aerosol<?pagebreak page7273?> formed from the 2MGA pathway is limited to
HMML reaction with water or inorganic ions such as nitrate and sulfate. The
importance of SOA from the 2MGA pathway will also depend on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio, while SOA formed from the LV pathway will be important under all
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios. Under typical atmospheric conditions (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 298 K,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 ppb, isoprene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 ppb, and OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), based on the simple assumptions discussed in
Sect. 5.5 we now estimate that the LV pathway produces moderately more SOA mass than the
2MGA pathway due to the high isoprene SOA yield from the LV pathway measured
in this work.</p>
      <p id="d1e9112">Given the high isoprene SOA mass yield from the LV pathway (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
measured here, low-volatility compounds are as important as 2MGA-based
compounds for isoprene SOA formed under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. Thus, further
studies investigating the formation rates and yields of these low-volatility
compounds are needed. Consistent with past work (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="altparen.158"/>), a
number of low-volatility nitrates and dinitrates, which are likely important
precursors for SOA formed from the LV pathway, were detected in the gas phase
by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CIMS (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS1"/>). These low-volatility
compounds are likely derived from OH-initiated oxidation of the
first-generation isoprene hydroxy nitrates. Synthetic pathways toward
standards of many of the isoprene hydroxy nitrates exist
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.159"/>. Now that this study has confirmed that
low-volatility products contribute significantly to isoprene SOA, measuring
SOA mass yields under varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fates using these isoprene hydroxy
nitrate standards as the initial precursor instead of isoprene could be
particularly valuable for decreasing the uncertainty in isoprene SOA yields.
Additionally, an improved mechanistic understanding of isoprene SOA is
needed. This would include an improved understanding of gas-phase reactions
including measurements of highly functionalized peroxy radical isomerization
rate constants, quantification of nitrate and hydroperoxide yields from
highly functionalized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals reacting with NO or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, and additional constraints on possible particle-phase accretion
reactions leading to lower-volatility products (e.g., hemiacetal formation).</p>
      <p id="d1e9194">There are some limitations for how results from this study should be
interpreted. In the atmosphere, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime is longer than that in
chamber experiments from this study and most past studies measuring SOA
yields. Due to limitations in the sensitivity of the DMA and high NO levels
needed to control the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fate, performing SOA yield chamber experiments
at conditions that favor a long <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime is difficult. At longer
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetimes, the hydroxy nitrate isomer distribution shifts toward a
higher percentage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-isomers over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-isomers
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.160"/>. Additionally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are decreasing
across many regions of the world due to improvements in emissions controls
creating mixed regimes in the ambient atmosphere where a later-generation
gas-phase product could form from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction during the
first generation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the
second generation. Field measurements confirm the presence of such
products. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.161"/> discuss the presence of dihydroxy
hydroperoxy nitrates detected in the particle phase by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.162"/> during
SOAS, a field campaign that took place during the summer in the southeastern
United States. Dihydroxy hydroperoxy nitrates likely form when hydroxy
nitrates, produced from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pathway, react with OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
form a peroxy radical that then reacts with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Additionally, because
isoprene SOA from the LV pathway only forms once later-generation products
become oxidized, the extent of oxidation is important but also difficult to
compare across different studies.</p>
      <p id="d1e9348">Comparisons of the DMA and AMS results imply that the collection and/or
ionization efficiency on the AMS for SOA formed from the LV pathway is
significantly lower than that formed from the 2MGA pathway. This could have
important consequences for the interpretation of ambient organic aerosol
measured by the AMS. Further work calibrating organic hydroxy nitrates on the
AMS is needed to better understand why the organic fraction analysis varied
so significantly between the two pathways.</p>
      <p id="d1e9351">Results from this work combined with past work provide further insight into
how isoprene SOA should be parameterized in global and regional atmospheric
chemistry models. Under humid conditions, SOA formation from the 2MGA pathway
is produced mostly from HMML ring-opening reactions to form monomer compounds
2-MGA, 2-MGA nitrate, and 2-MGA sulfate, which simplifies the
parameterization of SOA from the 2MGA pathway as the organic oligomerization
reactions can be ignored. The particle's liquid water and pH will be
important to consider, as these metrics shift the equilibrium of 2MGA and its
carboxylate and change the hydrolysis rates for the 2-MGA nitrate and
2-MGA sulfate. The gas-phase kinetics for MPAN formation and reaction with OH
to form HMML have been reasonably well studied (e.g.,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx58" id="altparen.163"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="altparen.164"/>). HMML formation and
generation of SOA in the atmosphere would be best incorporated into models by
directly forming SOA through the MPAN + OH reaction. This would best
parameterize the effects of temperature and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio on MPAN formation
and also the influence of OH on HMML formation. This study confirms the need
to perform experiments with adequate seed aerosol to limit vapor wall
deposition processes when measuring SOA yields from the LV pathway. When
regional chemical transport models use SOA yields that account for vapor wall
deposition, there are differences in the contribution of isoprene to the
total SOA budget and improvements in the agreement between simulated and
observed total SOA and diurnal variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.165"/>. Incorporating
the isoprene SOA yields from the LV pathway measured in this work into models
will further improve the accuracy of simulated isoprene SOA. Moreover, the
results from this study along with future experiments studying the formation
of low-volatility nitrates and<?pagebreak page7274?> dinitrates on a mechanistic basis will be
important for incorporating more explicit SOA formation into global models as
has recently been done (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="altparen.166"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="altparen.167"/>),
thus replacing previous parameterizations that were typically based on a
single chamber condition (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="altparen.168"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.169"/>;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="altparen.170"/>).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e9398">We welcome future collaboration with those who wish to use
this data set for additional modeling purposes (e.g., creating volatility
basis set parameters for global or regional models or for evaluating the results
with a more complex box model that includes aerosol chemistry). Please
contact Rebecca H. Schwantes (rschwant@ucar.edu).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e9401">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7255-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7255-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e9410">RHS designed the experiments. RHS and SMC performed the experiments.
RHS analyzed the data with help from SMC, KHB, TBN, JHS, and YH. RHS did the
kinetic modeling. YH, HM, WK, and RCF assisted RHS with DMA operation and
data analysis. RHS wrote the paper with assistance from KHB, TBN, JHS,
SMC, and YH.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e9416">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e9422">We thank Dennis Fitz for assistance
with maintenance and data analysis of the luminol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/acyl peroxynitrate
analyzer.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e9438">This research has been supported by the National Science
Foundation, Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences (grant
no. AGS-1523500) and the National Science Foundation (grant
no. 1745301). This material is based upon work supported by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement no. 1852977.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e9444">This paper was edited by Jacqui Hamilton and reviewed by two
anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Aiken et al.(2008)Aiken, DeCarlo, Kroll, Worsnop, Huffman, Docherty,
Ulbrich, Mohr, Kimmel, Sueper, Sun, Zhang, Trimborn, Northway, Ziemann,
Canagaratna, Onasch, Alfarra, Prevot, Dommen, Duplissy, Metzger,
Baltensperer, and Jimenez</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Sun,
Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna,
M. R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, R. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Dommen, J., Duplissy,
J., Metzger, A., Baltensperer, U., and Jimenez, J. L.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with high-resolution
time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
4478–4485, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es703009q</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Atkinson(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R.: Rate constants for the atmospheric reactions of alkoxy
radicals:
An updated estimation method, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8468–8485,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.002</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Br\'{e}gonzio-Rozier et~al.(2015)Bregonzio-Rozier, Siekmann, Giorio,
Pangui, Morales, Temime-Roussel, Gratien, Michoud, Ravier, Cazaunau, Tapparo,
Monod, and Doussin}}?><label>Brégonzio-Rozier et al.(2015)Bregonzio-Rozier, Siekmann, Giorio,
Pangui, Morales, Temime-Roussel, Gratien, Michoud, Ravier, Cazaunau, Tapparo,
Monod, and Doussin</label><mixed-citation>Brégonzio-Rozier, L., Siekmann, F., Giorio, C., Pangui, E., Morales, S.
B., Temime-Roussel, B., Gratien, A., Michoud, V., Ravier, S., Cazaunau, M.,
Tapparo, A., Monod, A., and Doussin, J.-F.: Gaseous products and secondary
organic aerosol formation during long term oxidation of isoprene and
methacrolein, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2953–2968,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2953-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2953-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Burkholder et al.(2015)Burkholder, Sander, Abbatt, Barker, Huie,
Kolb, Kurylo, Orkin, Wilmouth, and Wine</label><mixed-citation>Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J., Barker, J. R., Huie, R. E.,
Kolb,
C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Orkin, V. L., Wilmouth, D. M., and Wine, P. H.:
Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies,
Evaluation No. 18, Tech. Rep. JPL Publication 15-10, Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, <uri>http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov</uri> (last access: 24 March 2017),
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Canagaratna et al.(2015)Canagaratna, Jimenez, Kroll, Chen, Kessler,
Massoli, Hildebrandt Ruiz, Fortner, Williams, Wilson, Surratt, Donahue,
Jayne, and Worsnop</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Cappa et al.(2016)Cappa, Jathar, Kleeman, Docherty, Jimenez,
Seinfeld, and Wexler</label><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Jathar, S. H., Kleeman, M. J., Docherty, K. S., Jimenez, J. L.,
Seinfeld, J. H., and Wexler, A. S.: Simulating secondary organic aerosol in a
regional air quality model using the statistical oxidation model – Part 2:
Assessing the influence of vapor wall losses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
3041–3059, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3041-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3041-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Carlton et al.(2009)Carlton, Wiedinmyer, and Kroll</label><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary
Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
4987–5005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Chan et al.(2010)Chan, Chan, Surratt, Chhabra, Loza, Crounse, Yee,
Flagan, Wennberg, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Chan, A. W. H., Chan, M. N., Surratt, J. D., Chhabra, P. S., Loza, C. L.,
Crounse, J. D., Yee, L. D., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Role of aldehyde chemistry and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in
secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7169–7188,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7169-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7169-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Charan et al.(2018)Charan, Kong, Flagan, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Charan, S. M., Kong, W., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Effect of
particle
charge on aerosol dynamics in Teflon environmental chambers, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 52, 854–871,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1474167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2018.1474167</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Chhabra et al.(2010)Chhabra, Flagan, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Chhabra, P. S., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Elemental analysis of
chamber organic aerosol using an aerodyne high-resolution aerosol mass
spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4111–4131,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4111-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4111-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Clark et al.(2016)Clark, Kacarab, Nakao, Asa-Awuku, Sato, and
Cocker</label><mixed-citation>Clark, C. H., Kacarab, M., Nakao, S., Asa-Awuku, A., Sato, K., and Cocker,
D. R.: Temperature effects on secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from the dark
ozonolysis and photo-oxidation of isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
5564–5571, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b05524</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7275?><ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>D'Ambro et al.(2017)D'Ambro, Lee, Liu, Shilling, Gaston,
Lopez-Hilfiker, Schobesberger, Zaveri, Mohr, Lutz, Zhang, Gold, Surratt,
Rivera-Rios, Keutsch, and Thornton</label><mixed-citation>D'Ambro, E. L., Lee, B. H., Liu, J., Shilling, J. E., Gaston, C. J.,
Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Schobesberger, S., Zaveri, R. A., Mohr, C., Lutz, A.,
Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Surratt, J. D., Rivera-Rios, J. C., Keutsch, F. N., and
Thornton, J. A.: Molecular composition and volatility of isoprene
photochemical oxidation secondary organic aerosol under low- and high-NOx
conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 159–174,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-159-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-159-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Docherty et al.(2013)Docherty, Jaoui, Corse, Jimenez, Offenberg,
Lewandowski, and Kleindienst</label><mixed-citation>Docherty, K. S., Jaoui, M., Corse, E., Jimenez, J. L., Offenberg, J. H.,
Lewandowski, M., and Kleindienst, T. E.: Collection efficiency of the aerosol
mass spectrometer for chamber-generated secondary organic aerosols, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 47, 294–309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.752572" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2012.752572</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Dommen et al.(2006)Dommen, Metzger, Duplissy, Kalberer, Alfarra,
Gascho, Weingartner, Prevot, Verheggen, and Baltensperer</label><mixed-citation>Dommen, J., Metzger, A., Duplissy, J., Kalberer, M., Alfarra, M. R., Gascho,
A., Weingartner, E., Prevot, A. S. H., Verheggen, B., and Baltensperer, U.:
Laboratory observation of oligomers in the aerosol from isoprene/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
photooxidation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L13805,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026523" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026523</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Donahue et al.(2012)Donahue, Kroll, Pandis, and
Robinson</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Kroll, J. H., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A
two-dimensional volatility basis set – Part 2: Diagnostics of
organic-aerosol evolution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 615–634,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-615-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Edney et al.(2005)Edney, Kleindienst, Jaoui, Lewandowski, Offenberg,
Wang, and Claeys</label><mixed-citation>Edney, E. O., Kleindienst, T. E., Jaoui, M., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg,
J. H.,
Wang, W., and Claeys, M.: Formation of 2-methyl tetrols and 2-methylglyceric
acid in secondary organic aerosol from laboratory irradiated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">isoprene</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixtures and their detection in ambient
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
samples collected in the eastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 39,
5281–5289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.05.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.05.031</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Ehn et al.(2014)Ehn, Thornton, E., Sipila, Junninen, Pullinen,
Springer, Rubach, Tillmann, Lee, Lopez-Hilfiker, Andres, Acir, Rissanen,
Jokinen, Schobesberger, Kangasluoma, Kontkanen, Nieminen, Kurten, Nielsen,
Jorgensen, Kjaergaard, Canagaratna, Dal Maso, Berndt, Petaja, Wahner,
Kerminen, Kulmala, Worsnop, Wildt, and Mentel</label><mixed-citation>Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., E., K., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I.,
Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres,
S., Acir, I.-H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma,
J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurten, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S.,
Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T., Petaja, T.,
Wahner, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and
Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol,
Nature, 506, 476–479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13032</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Feiner et al.(2016)Feiner, Brune, Miller, Zhang, Cohen, Romer,
Goldstein, Keutsch, Skog, Wennberg, Nguyen, Teng, De Gouw, Koss, Wild, Brown,
Guenther, Edgerton, Baumann, and Fry</label><mixed-citation>Feiner, P. A., Brune, W. H., Miller, D. O., Zhang, L., Cohen, R. C., Romer,
P. S., Goldstein, A. H., Keutsch, F. N., Skog, K. M., Wennberg, P. O.,
Nguyen, T. B., Teng, A. P., De Gouw, J., Koss, A., Wild, R. J., Brown, S. S.,
Guenther, A., Edgerton, E., Baumann, K., and Fry, J. L.: Testing atmospheric
oxidation in an Alabama forest, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 4699–4710,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0044.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-16-0044.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Gaffney et al.(1998)Gaffney, Bornick, Chen, and Marley</label><mixed-citation>Gaffney, J. S., Bornick, R. M., Chen, Y.-H., and Marley, N. A.: Capillary gas
chromatographic analysis of nitrogen dioxide and PANs with luminol
chemiluminescent detection, Atmos. Environ., 32, 1445–1454,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00098-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00098-8</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Guenther et al.(2012)Guenther, Jiang, Heald, Sakulyanontvittaya,
Duhl, Emmons, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T.,
Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols
from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for
modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Hallquist et al.(2009)Hallquist, Wenger, Baltensperger, Rudich,
Simpson, Claeys, Dommen, Donahue, George, Goldstein, Hamilton, Herrmann,
Hoffmann, Iinuma, Jang, Jenkin, Jimenez, Kiendler-Scharr, Maenhaut,
McFiggans, Mentel, Monod, Prevot, Seinfeld, Surratt, Szmigielski, and
Wildt</label><mixed-citation>Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Heald et al.(2008)Heald, Henze, Horowitz, Feddema, Lamarque,
Guenther, Hess, Vitt, Seinfeld, Goldstein, and Fung</label><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Henze, D. K., Horowitz, L. W., Feddema, J., Lamarque, J.-F.,
Guenther, A., Hess, P. G., Vitt, F., Seinfeld, J. H., Goldstein, A. H., and
Fung, I.: Predicted change in global secondary organic aerosol concentrations
in response to future climate, emissions, and land use change, J. Geophys.
Res. Atmos., 113, D05211,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009092</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Henze and Seinfeld(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Henze, D. K. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global secondary organic aerosol from
isoprene oxidation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L09812,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025976" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL025976</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Henze et al.(2008)Henze, Seinfeld, Ng, Kroll, Fu, Jacob, and
Heald</label><mixed-citation>Henze, D. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Fu, T.-M., Jacob, D.
J., and Heald, C. L.: Global modeling of secondary organic aerosol formation
from aromatic hydrocarbons: high- vs. low-yield pathways, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
8, 2405–2420, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2405-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2405-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Huang et al.(2018)Huang, Zhao, Charan, Kenseth, Zhang, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Zhao, R., Charan, S. M., Kenseth, C. M., Zhang, X., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Unified theory of vapor-wall mass transport in Teflon-walled
environmental chambers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 2134–2142,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05575" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b05575</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Jacobs et al.(2014)Jacobs, Burke, and Elrod</label><mixed-citation>Jacobs, M. I., Burke, W. J., and Elrod, M. J.: Kinetics of the reactions of
isoprene-derived hydroxynitrates: gas phase epoxide formation and solution
phase hydrolysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8933–8946,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8933-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8933-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Jenkin et al.(1997)Jenkin, Saunders, and Pilling</label><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Saunders, S. M., and Pilling, M. J.: The tropospheric
degradation of volatile organic compounds: A protocol for mechanism
development, Atmos. Environ., 31, 81–104,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00105-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00105-7</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Jenkin et al.(2015)Jenkin, Young, and Rickard</label><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Young, J. C., and Rickard, A. R.: The MCM v3.3.1 degradation
scheme for isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11433–11459,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Kjaergaard et al.(2012)Kjaergaard, Knap, Ornso, Jorgensen, Crounse,
Paulot, and Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>Kjaergaard, H. G., Knap, H. C., Ornso, K. B., Jorgensen, S., Crounse, J. D.,
Paulot, F., and Wennberg, P. O.: Atmospheric fate of methacrolein. 2.
Formation of lactone and implications for organic aerosol production, J.
Phys. Chem. A., 116, 5763–5768,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp210853h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp210853h</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Kleindienst et al.(2006)Kleindienst, Edney, Lewandowski, Offenberg,
and Jaoui</label><mixed-citation>Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., and
Jaoui,
M.: Secondary organic carbon and aerosol yields from the irradiations of
isoprene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene in the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 3807–3812,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052446r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052446r</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Kleindienst et al.(2007)Kleindienst, Jaoui, Lewandowski, Offenberg,
Lewis, Bhave, and Edney</label><mixed-citation>Kleindienst, T. E., Jaoui, M., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Lewis,
C. W.,
Bhave, P. V., and Edney, E. O.: Estimates of the contributions of biogenic
and anthropogenic hydrocarbons to secondary organic aerosol at a southeastern
US location, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8288–8300,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.045</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Kleindienst et al.(2009)Kleindienst, Lewandowski, Offenberg, Jaoui,
and Edney</label><mixed-citation>Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Jaoui, M., and Edney,
E. O.: The formation of secondary organic aerosol from the isoprene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH
reaction in the absence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
6541–6558, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6541-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6541-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7276?><ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Knote et al.(2015)Knote, Tuccella, Curci, Emmons, Orlando, Madronich,
Baro, Jimenez-Guerrero, Luecken, Hogrefe, Forkel, Werhahn, Hirtl, Perez,
San Jose, Giordano, Brunner, Yahya, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Knote, C., Tuccella, P., Curci, G., Emmons, L., Orlando, J. J., Madronich,
S.,
Baro, R., Jimenez-Guerrero, P., Luecken, D., Hogrefe, C., Forkel, R.,
Werhahn, J., Hirtl, M., Perez, J. L., San Jose, R., Giordano, L., Brunner,
D., Yahya, K., and Zhang, Y.: Influence of the choice of gas-phase mechanism
on predictions of key gaseous pollutants during the AQMEII phase-2
intercomparison, Atmos. Environ., 115, 553–568,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.066</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Krechmer et al.(2015)Krechmer, Coggon, Massoli, Nguyen, Crounse, Hu,
Day, Tyndall, Henze, Rivera-Rios, Nowak, Kimmel, Mauldin, Stark, Janye,
Sipila, Junninen, St. Clair, Zhang, Feiner, Zhang, Miller, Brune, Keutsch,
Wennberg, Seinfeld, Worsnop, Jimenez, and Canagaratna</label><mixed-citation>Krechmer, J. E., Coggon, M. E., Massoli, P., Nguyen, T. B., Crounse, J. D.,
Hu,
W., Day, D. A., Tyndall, G. S., Henze, D. K., Rivera-Rios, J. C., Nowak,
J. B., Kimmel, J. R., Mauldin, R. L., Stark, H., Janye, J. T., Sipila, M.,
Junninen, H., St. Clair, J. M., Zhang, X., Feiner, P. A., Zhang, L., Miller,
D. O., Brune, W. H., Keutsch, F. N., Wennberg, P. O., Seinfeld, J. H.,
Worsnop, D. R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Formation of Low
Volatility Organic Compounds and Secondary Organic Aerosol from Isoprene
Hydroxyhydroperoxide Low-NO Oxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
10330–10339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b02031</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Kroll and Seinfeld(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol:
Formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 3593–3624,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Kroll et al.(2005)Kroll, Ng, Murphy, Flagan, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Murphy, S. M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation under
high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L18808,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023637" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023637</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Kroll et al.(2006)Kroll, Ng, Murphy, Flagan, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Murphy, S. M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 1869–1877,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0524301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0524301</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Kurten et al.(2016)Kurten, Tiusanen, Roldin, Rissanen, Luy, Boy, Ehn,
and Donahue</label><mixed-citation>Kurten, T., Tiusanen, K., Roldin, P., Rissanen, M., Luy, J.-N., Boy, M., Ehn,
M., and Donahue, N.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene autoxidation products may not have
extremely low saturation vapor pressures despite high O:C ratios, J. Phys.
Chem. A., 120, 2569–2582,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b02196" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.6b02196</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Lambe et al.(2015)Lambe, Chhabra, Onasch, Brune, Hunter, Kroll,
Cummings, Brogan, Parmar, Worsnop, Klob, and Davidovits</label><mixed-citation>Lambe, A. T., Chhabra, P. S., Onasch, T. B., Brune, W. H., Hunter, J. F.,
Kroll, J. H., Cummings, M. J., Brogan, J. F., Parmar, Y., Worsnop, D. R.,
Kolb, C. E., and Davidovits, P.: Effect of oxidant concentration, exposure
time, and seed particles on secondary organic aerosol chemical composition
and yield, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3063–3075,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3063-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3063-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Lee et al.(2016)Lee, Mohr, Lopez-Hilfiker, Lutz, Hallquist, Lee,
Romer, Cohen, Iyer, Kurten, Hu, Day, Campuzano-Jost, Jimenez, Xu, Ng, Guo,
Weber, Wild, Brown, Koss, de Gouw, Olson, Goldstein, Seco, Kim, McAvey,
Shepson, Starn, Baumann, Edgerton, Liu, Shilling, Miller, Brune,
Schobesberger, D'Ambro, and Thornton</label><mixed-citation>Lee, B. H., Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Lee,
L.,
Romer, P., Cohen, R. C., Iyer, S., Kurten, T., Hu, W., Day, D. A.,
Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Guo, H., Weber, R. J.,
Wild, R. J., Brown, S. S., Koss, A., de Gouw, J., Olson, K., Goldstein,
A. H., Seco, R., Kim, S., McAvey, K., Shepson, P. B., Starn, T., Baumann, K.,
Edgerton, E. S., Liu, J., Shilling, J. E., Miller, D. O., Brune, W.,
Schobesberger, S., D'Ambro, E. L., and Thornton, J. A.: Highly functionalized
organic nitrates in the southeast United States: Contribution to secondary
organic aerosol and reactive nitrogen budgets, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113,
1516–1521, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508108113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1508108113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Lee et al.(2014)Lee, Teng, Wennberg, Crounse, and Cohen</label><mixed-citation>Lee, L., Teng, A. P., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., and Cohen, R. C.: On
rates and mechanisms of OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions with isoprene-derived hydroxy
nitrates, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 1622–1637,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4107603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp4107603</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Lin et al.(2012)Lin, Zhang, Docherty, Zhang, Budisulistiorini,
Rubitschun, Shaw, Knipping, Edgerton, Kleindienst, Gold, and
Surratt</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y.-H., Zhang, Z., Docherty, K. S., Zhang, H., Budisulistiorini, S. H.,
Rubitschun, C. L., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Edgerton, E. S.,
Kleindienst, T. E., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Isoprene epoxydiols as
precursors to secondary organic aerosol formation: acid-catalyzed reactive
uptake studies with authentic compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46,
250–258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202554c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es202554c</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Lin et al.(2013)Lin, Zhang, Pye, Zhang, Marth, Park, Arashiro, Cui,
Budisulistiorini, Sexton, Vizuete, Xie, Luecken, Piletic, Edney, Bartolotti,
Gold, and Surratt</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y.-H., Zhang, H., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, Z., Marth, W. J., Park, S.,
Arashiro, M., Cui, T., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Sexton, K. G., Vizuete, W.,
Xie, Y., Luecken, D. J., Piletic, I. R., Edney, E. O., Bartolotti, L. J.,
Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Epoxide as a precursor to secondary organic
aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation in the presence of nitrogen
oxides, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 6718–6723,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221150110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1221150110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Loza et al.(2012)Loza, Chhabra, Yee, Craven, Flagan, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Loza, C. L., Chhabra, P. S., Yee, L. D., Craven, J. S., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemical aging of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene secondary organic aerosol:
laboratory chamber study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 151–167,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-151-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-151-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Mai and Flagan(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Mai, H. and Flagan, R. C.: Scanning DMA Data Analysis I. Classification
Transfer Function, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 1382–1399,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1528005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2018.1528005</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Mai et al.(2018)Mai, Kong, Seinfeld, and Flagan</label><mixed-citation>Mai, H., Kong, W., Seinfeld, J. H., and Flagan, R. C.: Scanning DMA Data
Analysis II. Integrated DMA-CPC Instrument Response and Data Inversion,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 1400–1414,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1528006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2018.1528006</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Marais et al.(2016)Marais, Jacob, Jimenez, Campuzano-Jost, Day, Hu,
Krechmer, Zhu, Kim, Miller, Fisher, Travis, Yu, Hanisco, Wolfe, Arkinson,
Pye, Froyd, Liao, and McNeill</label><mixed-citation>Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A.,
Hu, W., Krechmer, J., Zhu, L., Kim, P. S., Miller, C. C., Fisher, J. A.,
Travis, K., Yu, K., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., Arkinson, H. L., Pye, H. O.
T., Froyd, K. D., Liao, J., and McNeill, V. F.: Aqueous-phase mechanism for
secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene: application to the
southeast United States and co-benefit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission controls,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1603–1618, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Nah et al.(2017)Nah, McVay, Pierce, Seinfeld, and Ng</label><mixed-citation>Nah, T., McVay, R. C., Pierce, J. R., Seinfeld, J. H., and Ng, N. L.:
Constraining uncertainties in particle-wall deposition correction during SOA
formation in chamber experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2297–2310,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2297-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2297-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Nannoolal et al.(2004)Nannoolal, Rarey, Ramjugernath, and
Cordes</label><mixed-citation>Nannoolal, Y., Rarey, J., Ramjugernath, D., and Cordes, W.: Estimation of
pure
component properties Part 1. Estimation of the normal boiling point of
non-electrolyte organic compounds via group contributions and group
interactions, Fluid Phase Equilibr., 226, 45–63,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2004.09.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fluid.2004.09.001</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Nannoolal et al.(2008)Nannoolal, Rarey, and
Ramjugernath</label><mixed-citation>Nannoolal, Y., Rarey, J., and Ramjugernath, D.: Estimation of pure component
properties Part 3. Estimation of the vapor pressure of non-electrolyte
organic compounds via group contributions and group interactions, Fluid Phase
Equilibr., 269, 117–133,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2008.04.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fluid.2008.04.020</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Ng et al.(2006)Ng, Kroll, Keywood, Bahreini, Varutbangkul, Flagan,
and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Keywood, M. D., Bahreini, R., Varutbangkul, V.,
Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Contribution of first-versus
second-generation products to secondary organic aerosols formed in the
oxidation of biogenic hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2283–2297,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052269u" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052269u</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Nguyen et al.(2011)Nguyen, Roach, Laskin, Laskin, and
Nizhorodov</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Roach, P. J., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Effect of humidity on the composition of isoprene<?pagebreak page7277?> photooxidation secondary
organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6931–6944,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Nguyen et al.(2014a)Nguyen, Coggon, Bates, Zhang,
Schwantes, Schilling, Loza, Flagan, Wennberg, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Coggon, M. M., Bates, K. H., Zhang, X., Schwantes, R. H.,
Schilling, K. A., Loza, C. L., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Organic aerosol formation from the reactive uptake of isoprene
epoxydiols (IEPOX) onto non-acidified inorganic seeds, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 3497–3510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3497-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3497-2014</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Nguyen et al.(2014b)Nguyen, Crounse, Schwantes, Teng,
Bates, Zhang, St. Clair, Brune, Tyndall, Keutsch, Seinfeld, and
Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Teng, A. P., Bates, K. H.,
Zhang, X., St. Clair, J. M., Brune, W. H., Tyndall, G. S., Keutsch, F. N.,
Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Overview of the Focused Isoprene
eXperiment at the California Institute of Technology (FIXCIT): mechanistic
chamber studies on the oxidation of biogenic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 13531–13549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13531-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-13531-2014</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Nguyen et al.(2015)Nguyen, Bates, Crounse, Schwantes, Zhang,
Kjaergaard, Surratt, Lin, Laskin, Seinfeld, and Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Zhang, X.,
Kjaergaard, H. G., Surratt, J. D., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Seinfeld, J. H., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Mechanism of the hydroxyl radical oxidation of methacryloyl
peroxynitrate (MPAN) and its pathway toward secondary organic aerosol
formation in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 17914–17926,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02001H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP02001H</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Orlando and Tyndall(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Orlando, J. J. and Tyndall, G. S.: Laboratory studies of organic peroxy
radical
chemistry: an overview with emphasis on recent issues of atmospheric
significance, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6294–6317,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35166H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C2CS35166H</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Orlando et al.(1999)Orlando, Tyndall, and Paulson</label><mixed-citation>Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G. S., and Paulson, S. E.: Mechanism of the
OH-initiated oxidation of methacrolein, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2191–2194,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL900453</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Orlando et al.(2002)Orlando, Tyndall, Bertman, Chen, and
Burkholder</label><mixed-citation>Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G. S., Bertman, S. B., Chen, W., and Burkholder,
J. B.: Rate coefficient for the reaction of OH with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MPAN), Atmos. Environ., 36, 1895–1900,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00090-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00090-0</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Orlando et al.(2003)Orlando, Tyndall, and Wallington</label><mixed-citation>Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G. S., and Wallington, T. J.: The atmospheric
chemistry of alkoxy radicals, Chem. Rev., 103, 4657–4689,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020527p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr020527p</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Pajunoja et al.(2016)Pajunoja, Hu, Leong, Taylor, Miettinen, Palm,
Mikkonen, Collins, Jimenez, and Virtanen</label><mixed-citation>Pajunoja, A., Hu, W., Leong, Y. J., Taylor, N. F., Miettinen, P., Palm, B.
B., Mikkonen, S., Collins, D. R., Jimenez, J. L., and Virtanen, A.: Phase
state of ambient aerosol linked with water uptake and chemical aging in the
southeastern US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11163–11176,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11163-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-11163-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Pandis et al.(1991)Pandis, Paulson, Seinfeld, and
Flagan</label><mixed-citation>Pandis, S. N., Paulson, S. E., Seinfeld, J. H., and Flagan, R. C.: Aerosol
formation in the photooxidation of isoprene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, Atmos.
Environ., 25A, 997–1008,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(91)90141-S" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0960-1686(91)90141-S</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Paulot et al.(2009)Paulot, Crounse, Kjaergaard, Kurten, St. Clair,
Seinfeld, and Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>Paulot, F., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., Kurten, A., St. Clair, J. M.,
Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Unexpected epoxide formation in the
gas-phase photooxidation of isoprene, Science, 325, 730–733,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172910" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1172910</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Peeters et al.(2009)Peeters, Nguyen, and Vereecken</label><mixed-citation>Peeters, J., Nguyen, T. L., and Vereecken, L.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical
regeneration in
the oxidation of isoprene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 5935–5939,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b908511d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b908511d</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Peeters et al.(2014)Peeters, Muller, Stavrakou, and
Nguyen</label><mixed-citation>Peeters, J., Muller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., and Nguyen, V.: Hydroxyl radical
recycling in isoprene oxidation driven by hydrogen bonding and hydrogen
tunneling: The upgraded LIM1 mechanism, J. Phys. Chem. A., 118, 8625–8643,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5033146" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp5033146</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Pieber et al.(2016)Pieber, Haddad, Slowik, Canagaratna, Jayne, Platt,
Bozzetti, Daellenbach, Frohlich, Vlachou, Klein, Dommen, Miljevic, Jimenez,
Worsnop, Baltensperger, and Prevot</label><mixed-citation>Pieber, S. M., Haddad, I. E., Slowik, J. G., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne,
J. T.,
Platt, S. M., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. S., Frohlich, R., Vlachou, A.,
Klein, F., Dommen, J., Miljevic, B., Jimenez, J. L., Worsnop, D. R.,
Baltensperger, U., and Prevot, A. S. H.: Inorganic salt interference on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Aerodyne AMS and ACSM organic aerosol composition studies,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 10494–10503,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b01035</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Pierce et al.(2008)Pierce, Engelhart, Hildebrandt, Weitkamp, Pathak,
Donahue, Robinson, Adams, and Pandis</label><mixed-citation>Pierce, J. R., Engelhart, G. J., Hildebrandt, L., Weitkamp, E. A., Pathak,
R. K., Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Adams, P. J., and Pandis, S. N.:
Constraining particle evolution from wall losses, coagulation, and
condensation-evaporation in smog-chamber experiments: Optimal estimation
based on size distribution measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42,
1001–1015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802389251" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820802389251</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Praske et al.(2015)Praske, Crounse, Bates, Kurten, Kjaergaard, and
Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>Praske, E., Crounse, J. D., Bates, K. H., Kurten, T., Kjaergaard, H. G., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Atmospheric fate of methyl vinyl ketone: Peroxy radical
reactions with NO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Phys. Chem. A., 119, 4562–4572,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5107058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp5107058</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Ribeiro et al.(1992)Ribeiro, Raposo, Marat-Mendes, and
Giacometti</label><mixed-citation>Ribeiro, P. A., Raposo, M., Marat-Mendes, J. N., and Giacometti, J. A.:
Constant-current corona charging of biaxially stretched PVDF films in
humidity-controlled atmospheres, IEEE T. Electr. Insul.,
27, 744–750, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/14.155791" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/14.155791</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Sanchez et al.(2018)Sanchez, Jeong, Seco, Wrangham, Park, Brune,
Koss, Gilman, de Gouw, Misztal, Goldstein, Baumann, Wennberg, Keutsch,
Guenther, and Kim</label><mixed-citation>Sanchez, D., Jeong, D., Seco, R., Wrangham, I., Park, J.-H., Brune, W., Koss,
A., Gilman, J., de Gouw, J., Misztal, P., Goldstein, A., Baumann, K.,
Wennberg, P. O., Keutsch, F. N., Guenther, A., and Kim, S.: Intercomparison
of OH and OH reactivity measurements in a high isoprene and low NO
environment during the Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS), Atmos.
Environ., 174, 227–236,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.056</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Sander(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Sander, R.: Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 4.0) for water as
solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4399–4981,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4399-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-4399-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Saunders et al.(2003)Saunders, Jenkin, Derwent, and
Pilling</label><mixed-citation>Saunders, S. M., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Pilling, M. J.: Protocol
for the development of the Master Chemical Mechanism, MCM v3 (Part A):
tropospheric degradation of non-aromatic volatile organic compounds, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 3, 161–180, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-161-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-161-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Schwantes et al.(2017)Schwantes, Schilling, McVay, Lignell, Coggon,
Zhang, Wennberg, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Schwantes, R. H., Schilling, K. A., McVay, R. C., Lignell, H., Coggon, M. M.,
Zhang, X., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Formation of highly
oxygenated low-volatility products from cresol oxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
17, 3453–3474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3453-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-3453-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, 3 edn., John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., Hoboken,
New Jersey, USA, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Sharpe et al.(2004)Sharpe, Johnson, Sams, Chu, Rhoderick, and
Johnson</label><mixed-citation>Sharpe, S. W., Johnson, T. J., Sams, R. L., Chu, P. M., Rhoderick, G. C., and
Johnson, P. A.: Gas-phase databases for quantitative infrared spectroscopy,
composite spectrum for ISOPREN_25T (Ver 1.0, Oct, 01) and composite spectrum
for ISOBUTENAL_25T (Ver 1.0, Dec, 04), Appl. Spectrosc., 58, 1452–1461,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702042641281" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1366/0003702042641281</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Sjogren et al.(2007)Sjogren, Gysel, Weingartner, Baltensperger,
Cubison, Coe, Zardini, Marcolli, Krieger, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>Sjogren, S., Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Cubison, M., Coe,
H., Zardini, A., Marcolli, C., Krieger, U., and Peter, T.: Hygroscopic growth
and water uptake kinetics of two-phase aerosol particles consisting of
ammonium sulfate, adipic and humic acid mixtures, J. Aerosol Sci., 38,
157–171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.11.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.11.005</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7278?><ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Stadtler et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Stadtler, S., Kühn, T., Schröder, S., Taraborrelli, D., Schultz, M.
G., and Kokkola, H.: Isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol in the global
aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0–HAM2.3–MOZ1.0, Geosci. Model
Dev., 11, 3235–3260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>St. Clair et al.(2010)St. Clair, McCabe, Crounse, Steiner, and
Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>St. Clair, J. M., McCabe, D. C., Crounse, J. D., Steiner, U., and Wennberg,
P. O.: Chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometer for the in situ
measurement of methyl hydrogen peroxide, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 81, 094102,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3480552" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.3480552</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Sunol et al.(2018)Sunol, Charan, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Sunol, A. M., Charan, S. M., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Computational simulation of
the dynamics of secondary organic aerosol formation in an environmental
chamber, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 470–482,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1427209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2018.1427209</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Surratt et al.(2010)Surratt, Chan, Eddingsaas, Chan, Loza, Kwan,
Hersey, Flagan, Wennberg, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Chan, a. W. H., Eddingsaas, N. C., Chan, M. N., Loza, C. L.,
Kwan, a. J., Hersey, S. P., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Reactive intermediates revealed in secondary organic aerosol formation
from isoprene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6640–6645,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911114107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0911114107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Taylor et al.(1980)Taylor, Allston, Moscato, Fazekas, Kozlowski, and
Takacs</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, W. D., Allston, T. D., Moscato, M. J., Fazekas, G. B., Kozlowski, R.,
and Takacs, G. A.: Atmospheric photo-dissociation lifetimes for nitromethane,
methyl nitrite, and methyl nitrate, Int. J. Chem. Kinet, 12, 231–240,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550120404" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/kin.550120404</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Teng et al.(2017)Teng, Crounse, and Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>Teng, A. P., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Isoprene peroxy radical
dynamics, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 139, 5367–5377,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b12838" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jacs.6b12838</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Wennberg(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Wennberg, P. O.: Let's abandon the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> terminology,
IGACnews, 50, 3–4, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Wennberg et al.(2018)Wennberg, Bates, Crounse, Dodson, McVay,
Mertens, Nguyen, Praske, Schwantes, Smarte, St Clair, Teng, Zhang, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Wennberg, P. O., Bates,
K. H., Crounse, J. D., Dodson, L. G., McVay, R. C.,
Mertens, L. A., Nguyen, T. B., Praske, E., Schwantes, R. H., Smarte, M. D.,
St Clair, J. M., Teng, A. P., Zhang, X., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas-Phase
Reactions of Isoprene and Its Major Oxidation Products, Chem. Rev., 118,
3337–3390, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Xiong et al.(2015)Xiong, McAvey, Pratt, Groff, Hostetler, Lipton,
Starn, Seeley, Bertman, Teng, Crounse, Nguyen, Wennberg, Misztal, Goldstein,
Guenther, Koss, Olson, de Gouw, Baumann, Edgerton, Feiner, Zhang, Miller,
Brune, and Shepson</label><mixed-citation>Xiong, F., McAvey, K. M., Pratt, K. A., Groff, C. J., Hostetler, M. A.,
Lipton, M. A., Starn, T. K., Seeley, J. V., Bertman, S. B., Teng, A. P.,
Crounse, J. D., Nguyen, T. B., Wennberg, P. O., Misztal, P. K., Goldstein, A.
H., Guenther, A. B., Koss, A. R., Olson, K. F., de Gouw, J. A., Baumann, K.,
Edgerton, E. S., Feiner, P. A., Zhang, L., Miller, D. O., Brune, W. H., and
Shepson, P. B.: Observation of isoprene hydroxynitrates in the southeastern
United States and implications for the fate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 11257–11272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11257-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11257-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Xu et al.(2014)Xu, Kollman, Song, Shilling, and Ng</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Kollman, M. S., Song, C., Shilling, J. E., and Ng, N. L.: Effects of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the volatility of secondary organic aerosol from isoprene
photooxidation, Environ. Sci. Tech., 48, 2253–2262,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es404842g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es404842g</ext-link>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Zhang et al.(2011)Zhang, Surratt, Lin, Bapat, and Kamens</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Surratt, J. D., Lin, Y. H., Bapat, J., and Kamens, R. M.: Effect
of relative humidity on SOA formation from isoprene/NO photooxidation:
enhancement of 2-methylglyceric acid and its corresponding oligoesters under
dry conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6411–6424,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6411-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6411-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Zhang et al.(2012)Zhang, Lin, Zhang, Zhang, Shaw, Knipping, Weber,
Gold, Kamens, and Surratt</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Lin, Y. H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M.,
Weber, R. J., Gold, A., Kamens, R. M., and Surratt, J. D.: Secondary organic
aerosol formation from methacrolein photooxidation: roles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level,
relative humidity and aerosol acidity, Environ. Chem., 9, 247–262,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN12004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EN12004</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Zhang et al.(2018)Zhang, Yee, Lee, Curtis, Worton, Isaacman-VanWertz,
Offenberg, Lewandowski, Kleindienst, Beaver, Holder, Lonneman, Docherty,
Jaoui, Pye, Hu, Day, Campuzano-Jost, Jimenez, Guo, Weber, de Gouw, Koss,
Edgerton, Brune, Mohr, Lopez-Hilfiker, Lutz, Kreisberg, Spielman, Hering,
Wilson, Thornton, and Goldstein</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Yee, L. D., Lee, B. H., Curtis, M. P., Worton, D. R.,
Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Kleindienst, T. E.,
Beaver, M. R., Holder, A. L., Lonneman, W. A., Docherty, K. S., Jaoui, M.,
Pye, H. O. T., Hu, W., Day, D. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Guo,
H., Weber, R. J., de Gouw, J., Koss, A. R., Edgerton, E. S., Brune, W., Mohr,
C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Lutz, A., Kreisberg, N. M., Spielman, S. R.,
Hering, S. V., Wilson, K. R., Thornton, J. A., and Goldstein, A. H.:
Monoterpenes are the largest source of summertime organic aerosol in the
southeastern United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 2038–2043,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717513115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1717513115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Zhang et al.(2007)Zhang, Jimenez, Canagaratna, Allan, Coe, Ulbrich,
Alfarra, Takami, Middlebrook, Sun, Dzepina, Dunlea, Docherty, DeCarlo,
Salcedo, Onasch, Jayne, Miyoshi, Shimono, Hatakeyama, Takegawa, Kondo,
Schneider, Drewnick, Borrmann, Weimer, Demerjian, Williams, Bower, Bahreini,
Cottrell, Griffin, Rautiainen, Sun, Zhang, and Worsnop</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Ulbrich,
I., Alfarra, M. R., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Sun, Y. L., Dzepina, K.,
Dunlea, E., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P. F., Salcedo, D., Onasch, T., Jayne,
J. T., Miyoshi, T., Shimono, A., Hatakeyama, S., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y.,
Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K.,
Williams, P., Bower, K., Bahreini, R., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R. J.,
Rautiainen, J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Ubiquity and
dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in
anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL029979</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Zhang et al.(2014)Zhang, Cappa, Jather, McVay, Ensberg, Kleeman, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Cappa, C. D., Jather, S. H., McVay, R. C., Ensberg, J. J.,
Kleeman,
M. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Influence of vapor wall loss in laboratory
chambers on yields of secondary organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 5802–5807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404727111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1404727111</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Zhang et al.(2015)Zhang, Schwantes, McVay, Lignell, Coggon, Flagan,
and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Schwantes, R. H., McVay, R. C., Lignell, H., Coggon, M. M.,
Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Vapor wall deposition in Teflon chambers,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4197–4214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4197-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-4197-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Low-volatility compounds contribute significantly to isoprene secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under high-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> conditions</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Recent advances in our knowledge of the gas-phase oxidation of
isoprene, the impact of chamber walls on secondary organic aerosol (SOA) mass
yields, and aerosol measurement analysis techniques warrant reevaluating SOA
yields from isoprene. In particular, SOA from isoprene oxidation under
high-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> conditions forms via two major pathways: (1) low-volatility
nitrates and dinitrates (LV pathway) and (2) hydroxymethyl-methyl-<i>α</i>-lactone (HMML) reaction on a surface or the
condensed phase of particles to form 2-methyl glyceric acid and its oligomers
(2MGA pathway). These SOA production pathways respond differently to reaction
conditions. Past chamber experiments generated SOA with varying contributions
from these two unique pathways, leading to results that are difficult to
interpret. This study examines the SOA yields from these two pathways
independently, which improves the interpretation of previous results and
provides further understanding of the relevance of chamber SOA yields to the
atmosphere and regional or global modeling. Results suggest that low-volatility
nitrates and dinitrates produce significantly more aerosol than previously
thought; the experimentally measured SOA mass yield from the LV pathway is
 ∼ 0.15. Sufficient seed surface area at the start of the reaction is
needed to limit the effects of vapor wall losses of low-volatility compounds
and accurately measure the complete SOA mass yield. Under dry conditions,
substantial amounts of SOA are formed from HMML ring-opening reactions with
inorganic ions and HMML organic oligomerization processes. However, the
lactone organic oligomerization reactions are suppressed under more
atmospherically relevant humidity levels, where hydration of the lactone is
more competitive. This limits the SOA formation potential from the 2MGA
pathway to HMML ring-opening reactions with water or inorganic ions under
typical atmospheric conditions. The isoprene SOA mass yield from the LV
pathway measured in this work is significantly higher than previous studies
have reported, suggesting that low-volatility compounds such as organic
nitrates and dinitrates may contribute to isoprene SOA under high-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>
conditions significantly more than previously thought and thus deserve
continued study.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Aiken et al.(2008)Aiken, DeCarlo, Kroll, Worsnop, Huffman, Docherty,
Ulbrich, Mohr, Kimmel, Sueper, Sun, Zhang, Trimborn, Northway, Ziemann,
Canagaratna, Onasch, Alfarra, Prevot, Dommen, Duplissy, Metzger,
Baltensperer, and Jimenez</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Sun,
Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna,
M. R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, R. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Dommen, J., Duplissy,
J., Metzger, A., Baltensperer, U., and Jimenez, J. L.: O∕C and OM∕OC ratios
of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with high-resolution
time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
4478–4485, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Atkinson(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, R.: Rate constants for the atmospheric reactions of alkoxy
radicals:
An updated estimation method, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8468–8485,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.002</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Brégonzio-Rozier et al.(2015)Bregonzio-Rozier, Siekmann, Giorio,
Pangui, Morales, Temime-Roussel, Gratien, Michoud, Ravier, Cazaunau, Tapparo,
Monod, and Doussin</label><mixed-citation>
Brégonzio-Rozier, L., Siekmann, F., Giorio, C., Pangui, E., Morales, S.
B., Temime-Roussel, B., Gratien, A., Michoud, V., Ravier, S., Cazaunau, M.,
Tapparo, A., Monod, A., and Doussin, J.-F.: Gaseous products and secondary
organic aerosol formation during long term oxidation of isoprene and
methacrolein, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2953–2968,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2953-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2953-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Burkholder et al.(2015)Burkholder, Sander, Abbatt, Barker, Huie,
Kolb, Kurylo, Orkin, Wilmouth, and Wine</label><mixed-citation>
Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J., Barker, J. R., Huie, R. E.,
Kolb,
C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Orkin, V. L., Wilmouth, D. M., and Wine, P. H.:
Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies,
Evaluation No. 18, Tech. Rep. JPL Publication 15-10, Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, <a href="http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov" target="_blank">http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov</a> (last access: 24 March 2017),
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Canagaratna et al.(2015)Canagaratna, Jimenez, Kroll, Chen, Kessler,
Massoli, Hildebrandt Ruiz, Fortner, Williams, Wilson, Surratt, Donahue,
Jayne, and Worsnop</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Cappa et al.(2016)Cappa, Jathar, Kleeman, Docherty, Jimenez,
Seinfeld, and Wexler</label><mixed-citation>
Cappa, C. D., Jathar, S. H., Kleeman, M. J., Docherty, K. S., Jimenez, J. L.,
Seinfeld, J. H., and Wexler, A. S.: Simulating secondary organic aerosol in a
regional air quality model using the statistical oxidation model – Part 2:
Assessing the influence of vapor wall losses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
3041–3059, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3041-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3041-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Carlton et al.(2009)Carlton, Wiedinmyer, and Kroll</label><mixed-citation>
Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary
Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
4987–5005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Chan et al.(2010)Chan, Chan, Surratt, Chhabra, Loza, Crounse, Yee,
Flagan, Wennberg, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, A. W. H., Chan, M. N., Surratt, J. D., Chhabra, P. S., Loza, C. L.,
Crounse, J. D., Yee, L. D., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Role of aldehyde chemistry and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> concentrations in
secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7169–7188,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7169-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7169-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Charan et al.(2018)Charan, Kong, Flagan, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Charan, S. M., Kong, W., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Effect of
particle
charge on aerosol dynamics in Teflon environmental chambers, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 52, 854–871,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1474167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1474167</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Chhabra et al.(2010)Chhabra, Flagan, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Chhabra, P. S., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Elemental analysis of
chamber organic aerosol using an aerodyne high-resolution aerosol mass
spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4111–4131,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4111-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4111-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Clark et al.(2016)Clark, Kacarab, Nakao, Asa-Awuku, Sato, and
Cocker</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, C. H., Kacarab, M., Nakao, S., Asa-Awuku, A., Sato, K., and Cocker,
D. R.: Temperature effects on secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from the dark
ozonolysis and photo-oxidation of isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
5564–5571, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05524" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05524</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>D'Ambro et al.(2017)D'Ambro, Lee, Liu, Shilling, Gaston,
Lopez-Hilfiker, Schobesberger, Zaveri, Mohr, Lutz, Zhang, Gold, Surratt,
Rivera-Rios, Keutsch, and Thornton</label><mixed-citation>
D'Ambro, E. L., Lee, B. H., Liu, J., Shilling, J. E., Gaston, C. J.,
Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Schobesberger, S., Zaveri, R. A., Mohr, C., Lutz, A.,
Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Surratt, J. D., Rivera-Rios, J. C., Keutsch, F. N., and
Thornton, J. A.: Molecular composition and volatility of isoprene
photochemical oxidation secondary organic aerosol under low- and high-NOx
conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 159–174,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-159-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-159-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Docherty et al.(2013)Docherty, Jaoui, Corse, Jimenez, Offenberg,
Lewandowski, and Kleindienst</label><mixed-citation>
Docherty, K. S., Jaoui, M., Corse, E., Jimenez, J. L., Offenberg, J. H.,
Lewandowski, M., and Kleindienst, T. E.: Collection efficiency of the aerosol
mass spectrometer for chamber-generated secondary organic aerosols, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 47, 294–309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.752572" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.752572</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Dommen et al.(2006)Dommen, Metzger, Duplissy, Kalberer, Alfarra,
Gascho, Weingartner, Prevot, Verheggen, and Baltensperer</label><mixed-citation>
Dommen, J., Metzger, A., Duplissy, J., Kalberer, M., Alfarra, M. R., Gascho,
A., Weingartner, E., Prevot, A. S. H., Verheggen, B., and Baltensperer, U.:
Laboratory observation of oligomers in the aerosol from isoprene/NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>
photooxidation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L13805,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026523" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026523</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Donahue et al.(2012)Donahue, Kroll, Pandis, and
Robinson</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Kroll, J. H., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A
two-dimensional volatility basis set – Part 2: Diagnostics of
organic-aerosol evolution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 615–634,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Edney et al.(2005)Edney, Kleindienst, Jaoui, Lewandowski, Offenberg,
Wang, and Claeys</label><mixed-citation>
Edney, E. O., Kleindienst, T. E., Jaoui, M., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg,
J. H.,
Wang, W., and Claeys, M.: Formation of 2-methyl tetrols and 2-methylglyceric
acid in secondary organic aerosol from laboratory irradiated
isoprene∕NO<sub>X</sub>∕SO<sub>2</sub>∕air mixtures and their detection in ambient
PM<sub>2.5</sub>
samples collected in the eastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 39,
5281–5289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.05.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.05.031</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Ehn et al.(2014)Ehn, Thornton, E., Sipila, Junninen, Pullinen,
Springer, Rubach, Tillmann, Lee, Lopez-Hilfiker, Andres, Acir, Rissanen,
Jokinen, Schobesberger, Kangasluoma, Kontkanen, Nieminen, Kurten, Nielsen,
Jorgensen, Kjaergaard, Canagaratna, Dal Maso, Berndt, Petaja, Wahner,
Kerminen, Kulmala, Worsnop, Wildt, and Mentel</label><mixed-citation>
Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., E., K., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I.,
Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres,
S., Acir, I.-H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma,
J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurten, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S.,
Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T., Petaja, T.,
Wahner, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and
Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol,
Nature, 506, 476–479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Feiner et al.(2016)Feiner, Brune, Miller, Zhang, Cohen, Romer,
Goldstein, Keutsch, Skog, Wennberg, Nguyen, Teng, De Gouw, Koss, Wild, Brown,
Guenther, Edgerton, Baumann, and Fry</label><mixed-citation>
Feiner, P. A., Brune, W. H., Miller, D. O., Zhang, L., Cohen, R. C., Romer,
P. S., Goldstein, A. H., Keutsch, F. N., Skog, K. M., Wennberg, P. O.,
Nguyen, T. B., Teng, A. P., De Gouw, J., Koss, A., Wild, R. J., Brown, S. S.,
Guenther, A., Edgerton, E., Baumann, K., and Fry, J. L.: Testing atmospheric
oxidation in an Alabama forest, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 4699–4710,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0044.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0044.1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Gaffney et al.(1998)Gaffney, Bornick, Chen, and Marley</label><mixed-citation>
Gaffney, J. S., Bornick, R. M., Chen, Y.-H., and Marley, N. A.: Capillary gas
chromatographic analysis of nitrogen dioxide and PANs with luminol
chemiluminescent detection, Atmos. Environ., 32, 1445–1454,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00098-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00098-8</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Guenther et al.(2012)Guenther, Jiang, Heald, Sakulyanontvittaya,
Duhl, Emmons, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T.,
Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols
from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for
modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Hallquist et al.(2009)Hallquist, Wenger, Baltensperger, Rudich,
Simpson, Claeys, Dommen, Donahue, George, Goldstein, Hamilton, Herrmann,
Hoffmann, Iinuma, Jang, Jenkin, Jimenez, Kiendler-Scharr, Maenhaut,
McFiggans, Mentel, Monod, Prevot, Seinfeld, Surratt, Szmigielski, and
Wildt</label><mixed-citation>
Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Heald et al.(2008)Heald, Henze, Horowitz, Feddema, Lamarque,
Guenther, Hess, Vitt, Seinfeld, Goldstein, and Fung</label><mixed-citation>
Heald, C. L., Henze, D. K., Horowitz, L. W., Feddema, J., Lamarque, J.-F.,
Guenther, A., Hess, P. G., Vitt, F., Seinfeld, J. H., Goldstein, A. H., and
Fung, I.: Predicted change in global secondary organic aerosol concentrations
in response to future climate, emissions, and land use change, J. Geophys.
Res. Atmos., 113, D05211,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009092" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009092</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Henze and Seinfeld(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Henze, D. K. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global secondary organic aerosol from
isoprene oxidation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L09812,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025976" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025976</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Henze et al.(2008)Henze, Seinfeld, Ng, Kroll, Fu, Jacob, and
Heald</label><mixed-citation>
Henze, D. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Fu, T.-M., Jacob, D.
J., and Heald, C. L.: Global modeling of secondary organic aerosol formation
from aromatic hydrocarbons: high- vs. low-yield pathways, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
8, 2405–2420, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2405-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2405-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Huang et al.(2018)Huang, Zhao, Charan, Kenseth, Zhang, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, Y., Zhao, R., Charan, S. M., Kenseth, C. M., Zhang, X., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Unified theory of vapor-wall mass transport in Teflon-walled
environmental chambers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 2134–2142,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05575" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05575</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Jacobs et al.(2014)Jacobs, Burke, and Elrod</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobs, M. I., Burke, W. J., and Elrod, M. J.: Kinetics of the reactions of
isoprene-derived hydroxynitrates: gas phase epoxide formation and solution
phase hydrolysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8933–8946,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8933-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8933-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Jenkin et al.(1997)Jenkin, Saunders, and Pilling</label><mixed-citation>
Jenkin, M. E., Saunders, S. M., and Pilling, M. J.: The tropospheric
degradation of volatile organic compounds: A protocol for mechanism
development, Atmos. Environ., 31, 81–104,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00105-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00105-7</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Jenkin et al.(2015)Jenkin, Young, and Rickard</label><mixed-citation>
Jenkin, M. E., Young, J. C., and Rickard, A. R.: The MCM v3.3.1 degradation
scheme for isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11433–11459,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Kjaergaard et al.(2012)Kjaergaard, Knap, Ornso, Jorgensen, Crounse,
Paulot, and Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>
Kjaergaard, H. G., Knap, H. C., Ornso, K. B., Jorgensen, S., Crounse, J. D.,
Paulot, F., and Wennberg, P. O.: Atmospheric fate of methacrolein. 2.
Formation of lactone and implications for organic aerosol production, J.
Phys. Chem. A., 116, 5763–5768,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp210853h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp210853h</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Kleindienst et al.(2006)Kleindienst, Edney, Lewandowski, Offenberg,
and Jaoui</label><mixed-citation>
Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., and
Jaoui,
M.: Secondary organic carbon and aerosol yields from the irradiations of
isoprene and <i>α</i>-pinene in the presence of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 3807–3812,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052446r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es052446r</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Kleindienst et al.(2007)Kleindienst, Jaoui, Lewandowski, Offenberg,
Lewis, Bhave, and Edney</label><mixed-citation>
Kleindienst, T. E., Jaoui, M., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Lewis,
C. W.,
Bhave, P. V., and Edney, E. O.: Estimates of the contributions of biogenic
and anthropogenic hydrocarbons to secondary organic aerosol at a southeastern
US location, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8288–8300,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.045</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Kleindienst et al.(2009)Kleindienst, Lewandowski, Offenberg, Jaoui,
and Edney</label><mixed-citation>
Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Jaoui, M., and Edney,
E. O.: The formation of secondary organic aerosol from the isoprene&thinsp;+&thinsp;OH
reaction in the absence of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
6541–6558, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6541-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6541-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Knote et al.(2015)Knote, Tuccella, Curci, Emmons, Orlando, Madronich,
Baro, Jimenez-Guerrero, Luecken, Hogrefe, Forkel, Werhahn, Hirtl, Perez,
San Jose, Giordano, Brunner, Yahya, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Knote, C., Tuccella, P., Curci, G., Emmons, L., Orlando, J. J., Madronich,
S.,
Baro, R., Jimenez-Guerrero, P., Luecken, D., Hogrefe, C., Forkel, R.,
Werhahn, J., Hirtl, M., Perez, J. L., San Jose, R., Giordano, L., Brunner,
D., Yahya, K., and Zhang, Y.: Influence of the choice of gas-phase mechanism
on predictions of key gaseous pollutants during the AQMEII phase-2
intercomparison, Atmos. Environ., 115, 553–568,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.066</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Krechmer et al.(2015)Krechmer, Coggon, Massoli, Nguyen, Crounse, Hu,
Day, Tyndall, Henze, Rivera-Rios, Nowak, Kimmel, Mauldin, Stark, Janye,
Sipila, Junninen, St. Clair, Zhang, Feiner, Zhang, Miller, Brune, Keutsch,
Wennberg, Seinfeld, Worsnop, Jimenez, and Canagaratna</label><mixed-citation>
Krechmer, J. E., Coggon, M. E., Massoli, P., Nguyen, T. B., Crounse, J. D.,
Hu,
W., Day, D. A., Tyndall, G. S., Henze, D. K., Rivera-Rios, J. C., Nowak,
J. B., Kimmel, J. R., Mauldin, R. L., Stark, H., Janye, J. T., Sipila, M.,
Junninen, H., St. Clair, J. M., Zhang, X., Feiner, P. A., Zhang, L., Miller,
D. O., Brune, W. H., Keutsch, F. N., Wennberg, P. O., Seinfeld, J. H.,
Worsnop, D. R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Formation of Low
Volatility Organic Compounds and Secondary Organic Aerosol from Isoprene
Hydroxyhydroperoxide Low-NO Oxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
10330–10339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02031</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kroll and Seinfeld(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol:
Formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 3593–3624,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Kroll et al.(2005)Kroll, Ng, Murphy, Flagan, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Murphy, S. M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation under
high-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> conditions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L18808,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023637" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023637</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Kroll et al.(2006)Kroll, Ng, Murphy, Flagan, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Murphy, S. M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 1869–1877,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0524301" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0524301</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Kurten et al.(2016)Kurten, Tiusanen, Roldin, Rissanen, Luy, Boy, Ehn,
and Donahue</label><mixed-citation>
Kurten, T., Tiusanen, K., Roldin, P., Rissanen, M., Luy, J.-N., Boy, M., Ehn,
M., and Donahue, N.: <i>α</i>-Pinene autoxidation products may not have
extremely low saturation vapor pressures despite high O:C ratios, J. Phys.
Chem. A., 120, 2569–2582,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b02196" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b02196</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Lambe et al.(2015)Lambe, Chhabra, Onasch, Brune, Hunter, Kroll,
Cummings, Brogan, Parmar, Worsnop, Klob, and Davidovits</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Chhabra, P. S., Onasch, T. B., Brune, W. H., Hunter, J. F.,
Kroll, J. H., Cummings, M. J., Brogan, J. F., Parmar, Y., Worsnop, D. R.,
Kolb, C. E., and Davidovits, P.: Effect of oxidant concentration, exposure
time, and seed particles on secondary organic aerosol chemical composition
and yield, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3063–3075,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3063-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3063-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Lee et al.(2016)Lee, Mohr, Lopez-Hilfiker, Lutz, Hallquist, Lee,
Romer, Cohen, Iyer, Kurten, Hu, Day, Campuzano-Jost, Jimenez, Xu, Ng, Guo,
Weber, Wild, Brown, Koss, de Gouw, Olson, Goldstein, Seco, Kim, McAvey,
Shepson, Starn, Baumann, Edgerton, Liu, Shilling, Miller, Brune,
Schobesberger, D'Ambro, and Thornton</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, B. H., Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Lee,
L.,
Romer, P., Cohen, R. C., Iyer, S., Kurten, T., Hu, W., Day, D. A.,
Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Guo, H., Weber, R. J.,
Wild, R. J., Brown, S. S., Koss, A., de Gouw, J., Olson, K., Goldstein,
A. H., Seco, R., Kim, S., McAvey, K., Shepson, P. B., Starn, T., Baumann, K.,
Edgerton, E. S., Liu, J., Shilling, J. E., Miller, D. O., Brune, W.,
Schobesberger, S., D'Ambro, E. L., and Thornton, J. A.: Highly functionalized
organic nitrates in the southeast United States: Contribution to secondary
organic aerosol and reactive nitrogen budgets, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113,
1516–1521, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508108113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508108113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Lee et al.(2014)Lee, Teng, Wennberg, Crounse, and Cohen</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, L., Teng, A. P., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., and Cohen, R. C.: On
rates and mechanisms of OH and O<sub>3</sub> reactions with isoprene-derived hydroxy
nitrates, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 1622–1637,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4107603" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4107603</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Lin et al.(2012)Lin, Zhang, Docherty, Zhang, Budisulistiorini,
Rubitschun, Shaw, Knipping, Edgerton, Kleindienst, Gold, and
Surratt</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, Y.-H., Zhang, Z., Docherty, K. S., Zhang, H., Budisulistiorini, S. H.,
Rubitschun, C. L., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Edgerton, E. S.,
Kleindienst, T. E., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Isoprene epoxydiols as
precursors to secondary organic aerosol formation: acid-catalyzed reactive
uptake studies with authentic compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46,
250–258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202554c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es202554c</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Lin et al.(2013)Lin, Zhang, Pye, Zhang, Marth, Park, Arashiro, Cui,
Budisulistiorini, Sexton, Vizuete, Xie, Luecken, Piletic, Edney, Bartolotti,
Gold, and Surratt</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, Y.-H., Zhang, H., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, Z., Marth, W. J., Park, S.,
Arashiro, M., Cui, T., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Sexton, K. G., Vizuete, W.,
Xie, Y., Luecken, D. J., Piletic, I. R., Edney, E. O., Bartolotti, L. J.,
Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Epoxide as a precursor to secondary organic
aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation in the presence of nitrogen
oxides, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 6718–6723,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221150110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221150110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Loza et al.(2012)Loza, Chhabra, Yee, Craven, Flagan, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Loza, C. L., Chhabra, P. S., Yee, L. D., Craven, J. S., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemical aging of <i>m</i>-xylene secondary organic aerosol:
laboratory chamber study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 151–167,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-151-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-151-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Mai and Flagan(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Mai, H. and Flagan, R. C.: Scanning DMA Data Analysis I. Classification
Transfer Function, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 1382–1399,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1528005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1528005</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Mai et al.(2018)Mai, Kong, Seinfeld, and Flagan</label><mixed-citation>
Mai, H., Kong, W., Seinfeld, J. H., and Flagan, R. C.: Scanning DMA Data
Analysis II. Integrated DMA-CPC Instrument Response and Data Inversion,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 1400–1414,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1528006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1528006</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Marais et al.(2016)Marais, Jacob, Jimenez, Campuzano-Jost, Day, Hu,
Krechmer, Zhu, Kim, Miller, Fisher, Travis, Yu, Hanisco, Wolfe, Arkinson,
Pye, Froyd, Liao, and McNeill</label><mixed-citation>
Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A.,
Hu, W., Krechmer, J., Zhu, L., Kim, P. S., Miller, C. C., Fisher, J. A.,
Travis, K., Yu, K., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., Arkinson, H. L., Pye, H. O.
T., Froyd, K. D., Liao, J., and McNeill, V. F.: Aqueous-phase mechanism for
secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene: application to the
southeast United States and co-benefit of SO<sub>2</sub> emission controls,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1603–1618, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Nah et al.(2017)Nah, McVay, Pierce, Seinfeld, and Ng</label><mixed-citation>
Nah, T., McVay, R. C., Pierce, J. R., Seinfeld, J. H., and Ng, N. L.:
Constraining uncertainties in particle-wall deposition correction during SOA
formation in chamber experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2297–2310,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2297-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2297-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Nannoolal et al.(2004)Nannoolal, Rarey, Ramjugernath, and
Cordes</label><mixed-citation>
Nannoolal, Y., Rarey, J., Ramjugernath, D., and Cordes, W.: Estimation of
pure
component properties Part 1. Estimation of the normal boiling point of
non-electrolyte organic compounds via group contributions and group
interactions, Fluid Phase Equilibr., 226, 45–63,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2004.09.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2004.09.001</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Nannoolal et al.(2008)Nannoolal, Rarey, and
Ramjugernath</label><mixed-citation>
Nannoolal, Y., Rarey, J., and Ramjugernath, D.: Estimation of pure component
properties Part 3. Estimation of the vapor pressure of non-electrolyte
organic compounds via group contributions and group interactions, Fluid Phase
Equilibr., 269, 117–133,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2008.04.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2008.04.020</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Ng et al.(2006)Ng, Kroll, Keywood, Bahreini, Varutbangkul, Flagan,
and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Keywood, M. D., Bahreini, R., Varutbangkul, V.,
Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Contribution of first-versus
second-generation products to secondary organic aerosols formed in the
oxidation of biogenic hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2283–2297,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052269u" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es052269u</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Nguyen et al.(2011)Nguyen, Roach, Laskin, Laskin, and
Nizhorodov</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Roach, P. J., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Effect of humidity on the composition of isoprene photooxidation secondary
organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6931–6944,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Nguyen et al.(2014a)Nguyen, Coggon, Bates, Zhang,
Schwantes, Schilling, Loza, Flagan, Wennberg, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Coggon, M. M., Bates, K. H., Zhang, X., Schwantes, R. H.,
Schilling, K. A., Loza, C. L., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Organic aerosol formation from the reactive uptake of isoprene
epoxydiols (IEPOX) onto non-acidified inorganic seeds, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 3497–3510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3497-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3497-2014</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Nguyen et al.(2014b)Nguyen, Crounse, Schwantes, Teng,
Bates, Zhang, St. Clair, Brune, Tyndall, Keutsch, Seinfeld, and
Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Teng, A. P., Bates, K. H.,
Zhang, X., St. Clair, J. M., Brune, W. H., Tyndall, G. S., Keutsch, F. N.,
Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Overview of the Focused Isoprene
eXperiment at the California Institute of Technology (FIXCIT): mechanistic
chamber studies on the oxidation of biogenic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 13531–13549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13531-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13531-2014</a>, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Nguyen et al.(2015)Nguyen, Bates, Crounse, Schwantes, Zhang,
Kjaergaard, Surratt, Lin, Laskin, Seinfeld, and Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Zhang, X.,
Kjaergaard, H. G., Surratt, J. D., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Seinfeld, J. H., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Mechanism of the hydroxyl radical oxidation of methacryloyl
peroxynitrate (MPAN) and its pathway toward secondary organic aerosol
formation in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 17914–17926,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02001H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02001H</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Orlando and Tyndall(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Orlando, J. J. and Tyndall, G. S.: Laboratory studies of organic peroxy
radical
chemistry: an overview with emphasis on recent issues of atmospheric
significance, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6294–6317,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35166H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35166H</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Orlando et al.(1999)Orlando, Tyndall, and Paulson</label><mixed-citation>
Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G. S., and Paulson, S. E.: Mechanism of the
OH-initiated oxidation of methacrolein, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2191–2194,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900453</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Orlando et al.(2002)Orlando, Tyndall, Bertman, Chen, and
Burkholder</label><mixed-citation>
Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G. S., Bertman, S. B., Chen, W., and Burkholder,
J. B.: Rate coefficient for the reaction of OH with
CH<sub>2</sub> = C(CH<sub>3</sub>)C(O)OONO<sub>2</sub> (MPAN), Atmos. Environ., 36, 1895–1900,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00090-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00090-0</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Orlando et al.(2003)Orlando, Tyndall, and Wallington</label><mixed-citation>
Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G. S., and Wallington, T. J.: The atmospheric
chemistry of alkoxy radicals, Chem. Rev., 103, 4657–4689,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020527p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020527p</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Pajunoja et al.(2016)Pajunoja, Hu, Leong, Taylor, Miettinen, Palm,
Mikkonen, Collins, Jimenez, and Virtanen</label><mixed-citation>
Pajunoja, A., Hu, W., Leong, Y. J., Taylor, N. F., Miettinen, P., Palm, B.
B., Mikkonen, S., Collins, D. R., Jimenez, J. L., and Virtanen, A.: Phase
state of ambient aerosol linked with water uptake and chemical aging in the
southeastern US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11163–11176,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11163-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11163-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Pandis et al.(1991)Pandis, Paulson, Seinfeld, and
Flagan</label><mixed-citation>
Pandis, S. N., Paulson, S. E., Seinfeld, J. H., and Flagan, R. C.: Aerosol
formation in the photooxidation of isoprene and <i>β</i>-pinene, Atmos.
Environ., 25A, 997–1008,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(91)90141-S" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(91)90141-S</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Paulot et al.(2009)Paulot, Crounse, Kjaergaard, Kurten, St. Clair,
Seinfeld, and Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>
Paulot, F., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., Kurten, A., St. Clair, J. M.,
Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Unexpected epoxide formation in the
gas-phase photooxidation of isoprene, Science, 325, 730–733,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172910" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172910</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Peeters et al.(2009)Peeters, Nguyen, and Vereecken</label><mixed-citation>
Peeters, J., Nguyen, T. L., and Vereecken, L.: HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> radical
regeneration in
the oxidation of isoprene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 5935–5939,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b908511d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b908511d</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Peeters et al.(2014)Peeters, Muller, Stavrakou, and
Nguyen</label><mixed-citation>
Peeters, J., Muller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., and Nguyen, V.: Hydroxyl radical
recycling in isoprene oxidation driven by hydrogen bonding and hydrogen
tunneling: The upgraded LIM1 mechanism, J. Phys. Chem. A., 118, 8625–8643,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5033146" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5033146</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Pieber et al.(2016)Pieber, Haddad, Slowik, Canagaratna, Jayne, Platt,
Bozzetti, Daellenbach, Frohlich, Vlachou, Klein, Dommen, Miljevic, Jimenez,
Worsnop, Baltensperger, and Prevot</label><mixed-citation>
Pieber, S. M., Haddad, I. E., Slowik, J. G., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne,
J. T.,
Platt, S. M., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. S., Frohlich, R., Vlachou, A.,
Klein, F., Dommen, J., Miljevic, B., Jimenez, J. L., Worsnop, D. R.,
Baltensperger, U., and Prevot, A. S. H.: Inorganic salt interference on
CO<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> in Aerodyne AMS and ACSM organic aerosol composition studies,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 10494–10503,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01035</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Pierce et al.(2008)Pierce, Engelhart, Hildebrandt, Weitkamp, Pathak,
Donahue, Robinson, Adams, and Pandis</label><mixed-citation>
Pierce, J. R., Engelhart, G. J., Hildebrandt, L., Weitkamp, E. A., Pathak,
R. K., Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Adams, P. J., and Pandis, S. N.:
Constraining particle evolution from wall losses, coagulation, and
condensation-evaporation in smog-chamber experiments: Optimal estimation
based on size distribution measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42,
1001–1015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802389251" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802389251</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Praske et al.(2015)Praske, Crounse, Bates, Kurten, Kjaergaard, and
Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>
Praske, E., Crounse, J. D., Bates, K. H., Kurten, T., Kjaergaard, H. G., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Atmospheric fate of methyl vinyl ketone: Peroxy radical
reactions with NO and HO<sub>2</sub>, J. Phys. Chem. A., 119, 4562–4572,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5107058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5107058</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Ribeiro et al.(1992)Ribeiro, Raposo, Marat-Mendes, and
Giacometti</label><mixed-citation>
Ribeiro, P. A., Raposo, M., Marat-Mendes, J. N., and Giacometti, J. A.:
Constant-current corona charging of biaxially stretched PVDF films in
humidity-controlled atmospheres, IEEE T. Electr. Insul.,
27, 744–750, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/14.155791" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/14.155791</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Sanchez et al.(2018)Sanchez, Jeong, Seco, Wrangham, Park, Brune,
Koss, Gilman, de Gouw, Misztal, Goldstein, Baumann, Wennberg, Keutsch,
Guenther, and Kim</label><mixed-citation>
Sanchez, D., Jeong, D., Seco, R., Wrangham, I., Park, J.-H., Brune, W., Koss,
A., Gilman, J., de Gouw, J., Misztal, P., Goldstein, A., Baumann, K.,
Wennberg, P. O., Keutsch, F. N., Guenther, A., and Kim, S.: Intercomparison
of OH and OH reactivity measurements in a high isoprene and low NO
environment during the Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS), Atmos.
Environ., 174, 227–236,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.056</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Sander(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Sander, R.: Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 4.0) for water as
solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4399–4981,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4399-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4399-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Saunders et al.(2003)Saunders, Jenkin, Derwent, and
Pilling</label><mixed-citation>
Saunders, S. M., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Pilling, M. J.: Protocol
for the development of the Master Chemical Mechanism, MCM v3 (Part A):
tropospheric degradation of non-aromatic volatile organic compounds, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 3, 161–180, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-161-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-161-2003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Schwantes et al.(2017)Schwantes, Schilling, McVay, Lignell, Coggon,
Zhang, Wennberg, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Schwantes, R. H., Schilling, K. A., McVay, R. C., Lignell, H., Coggon, M. M.,
Zhang, X., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Formation of highly
oxygenated low-volatility products from cresol oxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
17, 3453–3474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3453-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3453-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, 3 edn., John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., Hoboken,
New Jersey, USA, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Sharpe et al.(2004)Sharpe, Johnson, Sams, Chu, Rhoderick, and
Johnson</label><mixed-citation>
Sharpe, S. W., Johnson, T. J., Sams, R. L., Chu, P. M., Rhoderick, G. C., and
Johnson, P. A.: Gas-phase databases for quantitative infrared spectroscopy,
composite spectrum for ISOPREN_25T (Ver 1.0, Oct, 01) and composite spectrum
for ISOBUTENAL_25T (Ver 1.0, Dec, 04), Appl. Spectrosc., 58, 1452–1461,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702042641281" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702042641281</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Sjogren et al.(2007)Sjogren, Gysel, Weingartner, Baltensperger,
Cubison, Coe, Zardini, Marcolli, Krieger, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
Sjogren, S., Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Cubison, M., Coe,
H., Zardini, A., Marcolli, C., Krieger, U., and Peter, T.: Hygroscopic growth
and water uptake kinetics of two-phase aerosol particles consisting of
ammonium sulfate, adipic and humic acid mixtures, J. Aerosol Sci., 38,
157–171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.11.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.11.005</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Stadtler et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Stadtler, S., Kühn, T., Schröder, S., Taraborrelli, D., Schultz, M.
G., and Kokkola, H.: Isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol in the global
aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0–HAM2.3–MOZ1.0, Geosci. Model
Dev., 11, 3235–3260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>St. Clair et al.(2010)St. Clair, McCabe, Crounse, Steiner, and
Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>
St. Clair, J. M., McCabe, D. C., Crounse, J. D., Steiner, U., and Wennberg,
P. O.: Chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometer for the in situ
measurement of methyl hydrogen peroxide, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 81, 094102,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3480552" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3480552</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Sunol et al.(2018)Sunol, Charan, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Sunol, A. M., Charan, S. M., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Computational simulation of
the dynamics of secondary organic aerosol formation in an environmental
chamber, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 470–482,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1427209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1427209</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Surratt et al.(2010)Surratt, Chan, Eddingsaas, Chan, Loza, Kwan,
Hersey, Flagan, Wennberg, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Chan, a. W. H., Eddingsaas, N. C., Chan, M. N., Loza, C. L.,
Kwan, a. J., Hersey, S. P., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Reactive intermediates revealed in secondary organic aerosol formation
from isoprene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6640–6645,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911114107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911114107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Taylor et al.(1980)Taylor, Allston, Moscato, Fazekas, Kozlowski, and
Takacs</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, W. D., Allston, T. D., Moscato, M. J., Fazekas, G. B., Kozlowski, R.,
and Takacs, G. A.: Atmospheric photo-dissociation lifetimes for nitromethane,
methyl nitrite, and methyl nitrate, Int. J. Chem. Kinet, 12, 231–240,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550120404" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550120404</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Teng et al.(2017)Teng, Crounse, and Wennberg</label><mixed-citation>
Teng, A. P., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Isoprene peroxy radical
dynamics, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 139, 5367–5377,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b12838" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b12838</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Wennberg(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Wennberg, P. O.: Let's abandon the high NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and low NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> terminology,
IGACnews, 50, 3–4, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Wennberg et al.(2018)Wennberg, Bates, Crounse, Dodson, McVay,
Mertens, Nguyen, Praske, Schwantes, Smarte, St Clair, Teng, Zhang, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Wennberg, P. O., Bates,
K. H., Crounse, J. D., Dodson, L. G., McVay, R. C.,
Mertens, L. A., Nguyen, T. B., Praske, E., Schwantes, R. H., Smarte, M. D.,
St Clair, J. M., Teng, A. P., Zhang, X., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas-Phase
Reactions of Isoprene and Its Major Oxidation Products, Chem. Rev., 118,
3337–3390, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Xiong et al.(2015)Xiong, McAvey, Pratt, Groff, Hostetler, Lipton,
Starn, Seeley, Bertman, Teng, Crounse, Nguyen, Wennberg, Misztal, Goldstein,
Guenther, Koss, Olson, de Gouw, Baumann, Edgerton, Feiner, Zhang, Miller,
Brune, and Shepson</label><mixed-citation>
Xiong, F., McAvey, K. M., Pratt, K. A., Groff, C. J., Hostetler, M. A.,
Lipton, M. A., Starn, T. K., Seeley, J. V., Bertman, S. B., Teng, A. P.,
Crounse, J. D., Nguyen, T. B., Wennberg, P. O., Misztal, P. K., Goldstein, A.
H., Guenther, A. B., Koss, A. R., Olson, K. F., de Gouw, J. A., Baumann, K.,
Edgerton, E. S., Feiner, P. A., Zhang, L., Miller, D. O., Brune, W. H., and
Shepson, P. B.: Observation of isoprene hydroxynitrates in the southeastern
United States and implications for the fate of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 11257–11272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11257-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11257-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Xu et al.(2014)Xu, Kollman, Song, Shilling, and Ng</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, L., Kollman, M. S., Song, C., Shilling, J. E., and Ng, N. L.: Effects of
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> on the volatility of secondary organic aerosol from isoprene
photooxidation, Environ. Sci. Tech., 48, 2253–2262,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es404842g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es404842g</a>, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Zhang et al.(2011)Zhang, Surratt, Lin, Bapat, and Kamens</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Surratt, J. D., Lin, Y. H., Bapat, J., and Kamens, R. M.: Effect
of relative humidity on SOA formation from isoprene/NO photooxidation:
enhancement of 2-methylglyceric acid and its corresponding oligoesters under
dry conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6411–6424,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6411-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6411-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Zhang et al.(2012)Zhang, Lin, Zhang, Zhang, Shaw, Knipping, Weber,
Gold, Kamens, and Surratt</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Lin, Y. H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M.,
Weber, R. J., Gold, A., Kamens, R. M., and Surratt, J. D.: Secondary organic
aerosol formation from methacrolein photooxidation: roles of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> level,
relative humidity and aerosol acidity, Environ. Chem., 9, 247–262,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN12004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/EN12004</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Zhang et al.(2018)Zhang, Yee, Lee, Curtis, Worton, Isaacman-VanWertz,
Offenberg, Lewandowski, Kleindienst, Beaver, Holder, Lonneman, Docherty,
Jaoui, Pye, Hu, Day, Campuzano-Jost, Jimenez, Guo, Weber, de Gouw, Koss,
Edgerton, Brune, Mohr, Lopez-Hilfiker, Lutz, Kreisberg, Spielman, Hering,
Wilson, Thornton, and Goldstein</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Yee, L. D., Lee, B. H., Curtis, M. P., Worton, D. R.,
Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Kleindienst, T. E.,
Beaver, M. R., Holder, A. L., Lonneman, W. A., Docherty, K. S., Jaoui, M.,
Pye, H. O. T., Hu, W., Day, D. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Guo,
H., Weber, R. J., de Gouw, J., Koss, A. R., Edgerton, E. S., Brune, W., Mohr,
C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Lutz, A., Kreisberg, N. M., Spielman, S. R.,
Hering, S. V., Wilson, K. R., Thornton, J. A., and Goldstein, A. H.:
Monoterpenes are the largest source of summertime organic aerosol in the
southeastern United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 2038–2043,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717513115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717513115</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Zhang et al.(2007)Zhang, Jimenez, Canagaratna, Allan, Coe, Ulbrich,
Alfarra, Takami, Middlebrook, Sun, Dzepina, Dunlea, Docherty, DeCarlo,
Salcedo, Onasch, Jayne, Miyoshi, Shimono, Hatakeyama, Takegawa, Kondo,
Schneider, Drewnick, Borrmann, Weimer, Demerjian, Williams, Bower, Bahreini,
Cottrell, Griffin, Rautiainen, Sun, Zhang, and Worsnop</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Ulbrich,
I., Alfarra, M. R., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Sun, Y. L., Dzepina, K.,
Dunlea, E., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P. F., Salcedo, D., Onasch, T., Jayne,
J. T., Miyoshi, T., Shimono, A., Hatakeyama, S., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y.,
Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K.,
Williams, P., Bower, K., Bahreini, R., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R. J.,
Rautiainen, J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Ubiquity and
dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in
anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029979" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029979</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Zhang et al.(2014)Zhang, Cappa, Jather, McVay, Ensberg, Kleeman, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Cappa, C. D., Jather, S. H., McVay, R. C., Ensberg, J. J.,
Kleeman,
M. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Influence of vapor wall loss in laboratory
chambers on yields of secondary organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 5802–5807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404727111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404727111</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Zhang et al.(2015)Zhang, Schwantes, McVay, Lignell, Coggon, Flagan,
and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Schwantes, R. H., McVay, R. C., Lignell, H., Coggon, M. M.,
Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Vapor wall deposition in Teflon chambers,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4197–4214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4197-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4197-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
