<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-617-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Characterization of VOCs and their related atmospheric processes in a
central Chinese city during severe ozone pollution periods</article-title><alt-title>Characterization of VOCs and their related atmospheric processes</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Characterization of VOCs and their related atmospheric processes}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B. Li et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Bowei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Ho</surname><given-names>Steven Sai Hang</given-names></name>
          <email>stevenho@hkpsrl.org</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4877-5994</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>Sunling</given-names></name>
          <email>gongsl@cma.gov.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ni</surname><given-names>Jingwei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Huairui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Liyan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Yi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>Yijin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Dongxu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Langfang Academy of Eco Industrialization for Wisdom Environment, Langfang 065000, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Key Lab of Aerosol Chemistry &amp; Physics, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Xi'an 710061, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Center for Atmosphere Watch and Services of CMA, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Beijing 100081, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Steven Sai Hang Ho (stevenho@hkpsrl.org) and Sunling Gong (gongsl@cma.gov.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>617</fpage><lpage>638</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>18</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>10</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e180">A 5-month campaign (from May to September 2017) was conducted to
characterize volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for the first time at four
sites in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China, where ground level ozone
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentration has shown an increasing trend in recent years. Canister
samples were collected for the measurement of 57 VOCs, which, along with
reactive nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), are the most important <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors.
During the same period, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its precursor gases were monitored online
simultaneously. The results indicated that the average mixing ratio of total
quantified VOCs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv) in Zhengzhou
was lower than that in the other Chinese megacities, while alkyne comprised a
higher proportion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The abundances, compositions and ratios
of typical VOCs showed clear spatial and temporal variations. Cluster
analysis indicates that air masses from the south of Zhengzhou were cleaner than
from other directions. The molar ratio of VOCs to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicated that,
in general, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation was more sensitive to VOCs than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
formation in Zhengzhou. The source apportionment was conducted with positive
matrix factorization (PMF), and it was found that vehicle exhaust, coal and
biomass burning and solvent usage were the major sources for ambient VOCs at
all four sites. From potential source contribution function (PSCF) analysis,
the strong emissions from coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning and solvent usage were
concentrated in the southwest of Shanxi and Henan provinces. This
study gathers scientific evidence on the pollution sources for Zhengzhou, benefiting the government to establish efficient environmental control
measures, particularly for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e318">Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are diverse and reactive
chemicals. Vehicle exhausts, fuel combustion and evaporation, and solvent
usage are the known major anthropogenic sources of VOCs (Fujita, 2001; Fujita et al.,
1994; US EPA, 2000;  Borbon et al., 2002). VOCs play a crucial
role in the ground-level ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) pollution (Haagen-Smit, 1952;
Choek and Heuss, 1987), which has troubled many cities with rapid economy growth (Wang et al., 2017b; Nagashima et al., 2017). Many related studies
are thus being conducted globally (Wei et al., 2014; Malley et al., 2015;
Ou et al., 2015). In China, the investigations on VOCs including source
apportionment, measurement of emission profiles and interpretation of
seasonal variations were mainly concentrated in Yangtze River Delta (YRD),
Pearl River Delta (PRD) and Beijing–Tianjin (BJT) regions (An et al.,
2014; Wang et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2016; Guo et al.,
2017). Limited studies have been conducted in less developed or developing
regions (i.e., southwestern and northwestern China), which are prominently
impacted by biomass<?pagebreak page618?> burning and have high abundances of toxic and reactive
compounds (Li et al., 2014, 2017a).</p>
      <p id="d1e332">A total of 57 VOCs, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alkanes, alkenes, alkynes and
aromatics, which greatly contribute to ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, have been
identified and are regularly monitored by Photochemical Assessment
Monitoring Stations (PAMS) (US EPA, 1990; Oliver et al., 1996).
Due to the characteristic structure and reactivity of these compounds, their
contributions to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production vary (Carter, 1994); it has
been reported that aromatics and alkenes were responsible for most of the
weighted reactivity of VOCs (59.4 % and 25.8 %, respectively) in the PRD region in China (Ou et al., 2015). Consequently,
researchers have deduced that the reduction of alkenes and aromatics is a
suitable target for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> control (Wang et al., 2018). In addition,
with the variations in energy structure, industrial construction and
meteorological conditions (Shao et al., 2011;
Wang et al., 2015), major emission sources of VOCs in each city are unique.
In the less developed cities of Heilongjiang and Anhui, biomass combustion
showed the highest contribution (40 % and 36 %, respectively) to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
formation potential due to a high level of agricultural activities, while
in developed cities such as Shanghai, Beijing and Zhejiang, solvent
usage has become a more important source (Wu and Xie,
2017). Therefore, identification of the district emission sources of VOCs is
necessary to provide scientific-based information for policymakers who
establish efficient strategies to alleviate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution.</p>
      <p id="d1e413">In addition to the factors discussed above, nonlinear relationships between
ambient VOCs, nitrogen oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production show that
decreasing tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is more complex than expected (Lin et
al., 1998; Hidy and Blanchard, 2015; Li et al., 2018). Many modeling and
field studies showed that photochemical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in several
cities in China, such as Guangzhou, Shanghai and Beijing with high levels of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was highly sensitive to VOCs (Shao et al., 2009; Ou et al.,
2016; Gao et al., 2017). The sensitivity regime is always varied with time
and geographical locations (Luecken et al., 2018). The
percentage of the VOC-limited regime in the North China Plain (NCP) increased from
4 % to 6 % between 2005 and 2013, owing to the rapid increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions (Jin and Holloway, 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e483">Zhengzhou is an important developing city in the mid-west of the
Huanghe–Huaihe river floodplain in China. As the capital city of Henan
Province, it is densely populated, with more than 7 million residents in
2010 (Geng et al., 2013). With the rapid growth of industrial
activities, as well as increased vehicle emissions and fuel combustion, air
quality in Zhengzhou has deteriorated. The air quality index (AQI) for
65 % of the days in 2013 exceeded the allowable limit of 100 established
by air quality guidelines (Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection,
2012). Particularly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was the major pollutant in summer, and over
50 % of the days in 2015, the mixing ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeded the Grade
I standard (100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the daily maximum average 8 h (DMA8)
in Henan (Shen et al., 2017; Gong et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018). As one
of the major precursors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the study on VOCs is of significance for
Zhengzhou, since no related research has been published in peer-reviewed
literature. In this work, a comprehensive sampling campaign for VOCs' measurement and characterization has been conducted at four monitoring
stations during the time period of May–September 2017. The spatial and
temporal variations in VOCs in Zhengzhou were determined. The contributions
of major emission sources were quantified, and the relationship among
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–VOCs–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was discussed in detail. The results and implications
from this study can provide useful guidance for policymakers to alleviate
ozone pollution in Zhengzhou, China.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e564">Satellite imagery showing the four sampling sites and surrounding
areas of Zhengzhou, China, including major emission sources shown by different
marks.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Observation and methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Sampling site</title>
      <p id="d1e584">Based on the density of population distribution, locations of industrial
facilities and the prevailing winds, four sites have been selected for
sample collection: Jingkai community (JK; 113.73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E,
34.72<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), municipal environmental monitoring station (MEM;
113.61<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 34.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), Yinhang school (YH;
113.68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 34.80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and Gongshui company (GS;
113.57<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 34.81<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), which are located in the
southeast, southwest, north and northwest of Zhengzhou,
respectively (Fig. 1). There is a main airport highway and heavy-traffic
ring roads approximately 500 m west of JK. Furthermore, the site is at a
distance of 2 km from an industrial area, which includes packaging and
printing plants and material distribution factories. It is noteworthy that
there are three coal-fired power plants in the urban area of Zhengzhou.
One of the power plants with the highest production was 1.6 km northwest of
MEM, and MEM was surrounded by a main road with four traffic lanes; the
distance between the nearest traffic light and the sampling site was just
200 m. Both the MEM and YH include a mix of commercial and condensed
residential areas, and the apartments around YH are older. The GS
site is surrounded by several manufacturing plants, including those for pharmaceuticals, materials, foods and machineries.</p>
      <p id="d1e660">A total of 10 dry days (i.e., no rainfall recorded) were chosen in every month during
the period of May–September 2017 to represent typical air
quality conditions in a month. Grab samples were collected using 3.2 L
stainless-steel canisters (Entech Instrument, Inc., Simi Valley, CA, USA),
which were pre-cleaned with high-purity nitrogen and pressurized to 20 psi.
Two samples, one collected at 07:00 with an increase of human activities and
another one collected at 14:00 with well-mixed ambient air, were obtained
on each sampling day. A total of 400 samples were collected in this study.
The chemical analysis was accomplished within 2 weeks after the collection
of samples. Real-time data for trace gases, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and synchronous meteorological
data, such as temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), relative humidity (RH), wind direction (WD)
and wind speed<?pagebreak page619?> (WS), were recorded at each air monitoring station. Information detailing relevant equipment is listed in Table S1 in the
Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Chemical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e716">In this study, the measurement of VOCs was based on Compendium Method TO-15,
which was established by the U.S. EPA (US EPA, 1999). Air in the canister was
concentrated using liquid nitrogen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">160</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in a cryogenic
pre-concentrator (7100A, Entech Instrument, Inc.). Both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were removed from the transfer line. The air was then thermally
desorbed at 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and transferred for analysis to a gas
chromatograph (GC, 7890A, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA)
coupled with dual detectors, i.e., a mass spectrometric detector (MSD) and a
flame ionization detector (FID) (5977E, Agilent Technology). Dual columns
were applied for the simultaneous analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
hydrocarbons. A PLOT column (15 m, internal diameter of 0.32 mm and film
thickness of 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) was connected to the FID for detection of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NMHCs, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NMHCs, oxygenated VOCs
(OVOCs) and halocarbons were separated using a DB-624 column (30 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm inner diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m film
thickness), which was connected to the MSD. Target compounds were identified
with retention time and mass spectra, and were quantified with a multipoint
calibration curve in this study. The standard gas of PAMS (1 ppm; Spectra
Gases Inc, NJ, USA) was used to construct the calibration curves for the 57
target VOCs, including 28 alkanes, 11 alkenes, acetylene and 17 aromatics.
Detailed information on the target analyses involved in this study and their
corresponding linearity of calibration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), measurement relative
standard deviation (RSD), method detection limit (MDL) and maximum increment
reactivity (MIR; Carter, 2010) is presented in Table S2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Positive matrix factorization (PMF)</title>
      <p id="d1e890">The U.S. EPA PMF 5.0 software was used for source apportionment (Lau et
al., 2010; Abeleira et al., 2017; Xue et al., 2017). Due to the complex
chemical reactions, the application of PMF in VOCs has to be based on a
couple of principles: eliminating species with mixing ratios below MDL and
excluding species with high reactivity, except for the source markers (Guo
et al., 2011; Shao et al., 2016). Finally, 31 VOC species and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were chosen for the source apportionment analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e904">In this study, PMF was performed with 50 base runs for each site; results
with the minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value (a parameter used to express uncertainties of PMF
results) were considered as optimum solutions. In Table S3 the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coefficients between observed values and predicted values of selected VOCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are presented for the four sites. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coefficients for most species
(&gt; 80 %) were higher than 0.6, and compounds with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.6 were downweighted when determining factor sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e958">During PMF analysis, a bootstrap method was used to evaluate stability and
uncertainty of the base run solution, setting the minimum correlation
coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.6. A total of 100 bootstrap runs were performed, and the
results are shown in Table S4. Acceptable results (&gt; 80 %) were gained for all the factors.</p>
      <p id="d1e972">Three to nine factors were selected to initiate the running of PMF. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(exp) values for every site at fixed factor size are presented in Table S5.
With the increase of factor number, the ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(exp) declined due to
additional<?pagebreak page620?> factors. When the factor size changed from 3 to 4, 4 to 5 and 5
to 6, the decrement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(exp) was larger (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–25 %),
while the change was lower than 12 % after factors increased to 7. Combined with the field conditions, six factors were defined at each site.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1025">Mean concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppbv) and correspondent
standard deviations (SDs) at every site during the sampling period.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">JK </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">MEM </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">GS </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center">YH </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">May 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">37.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">29.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jun 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">28.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jul 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aug 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">26.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sep 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">32.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">19.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1274">Wind direction for each site during May to September 2017.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Potential source contribution function (PSCF)</title>
      <p id="d1e1289">In this trajectory-based study, the probability of air clusters with source
concentration higher than a certain value was estimated (Hopke
et al., 1995). Briefly, the PSCF value in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>th grid was the ratio of
the number of endpoints with higher source concentration relative to the
total number of endpoints in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>th grid cell. The criterion value, equal
to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>th percentile of the targeted source concentration in this study,
was used to establish whether the value was higher or not. The 48 h back
trajectories were calculated using the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian
Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model. Because there are many grid cells
with small values, which could result in high uncertainty, a weighted
potential source contribution function (WPSCF; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was introduced (Polissar
et al., 1999). According to the average values of end points in each cell, in
this case, Wij was presented as below.

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M77" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Estimation of the initial {$\protect\chem{NO_{\mathit{x}}}$} and VOCs}?><title>Estimation of the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOCs</title>
      <p id="d1e1442">With the assumption that chemical loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOCs was mainly due
to their reactions with hydroxyl radical (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH), the initial
mixing ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be calculated with the equation as
follows (Shiu et al., 2007; Shao et al., 2009):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M82" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for the reaction rate between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH. In
this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was set as the product of the rate constant for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> multiplied by the observed average ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during this campaign.</p>
      <p id="d1e1612">The photochemical age (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be estimated from the ratio between
two compounds, emitted from a common source, but with a different reaction
rate with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH. For this case, the photochemical age clock was
performed with ethylbenzene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Sun et al.,
2016).

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M97" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent their rate constants with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correspond to the observed mixing ratios; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were their initial concentrations. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
estimated from the 5th percentile of the observed ratios at 07:00 in this
paper.</p>
      <p id="d1e1841">The initial mixing ratio of VOCs was estimated using the same method as for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Shiu et al., 2007):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M107" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where [VOC]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was the observed mixing ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th species and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was the correspondent rate constant with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Meteorological variations and mixing ratios</title>
      <p id="d1e1958">Meteorological conditions are important factors that impact both the
compositions and levels of VOCs. During the sampling period, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> varied
from 15 to 38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, RH varied from 38 % to 100 % (Fig. S1 in the Supplement) and the
dominant winds were northwestern and southeastern (Fig. 2). The air
clusters, analyzed using the HYSPLIT model, showed moderate differences in each
month (Fig. 3). In May, clusters arriving at Zhengzhou demonstrated longer
paths, and included six clusters in total, while in June, the length of
clusters was shorter. However, the concentration levels and compositions of
VOCs were similar in the two months. In May, the largest cluster (27.2 %) passed over from Yinchuan, a central city in northwest China, then
crossed several non-capital cities (i.e., Yanan, Yuncheng and Luoyang) in
Shanxi and Sichuan provinces. Such long-range transport of pollutants has
less impact on the air quality of Zhengzhou, as a comparable level and similar
compositions of VOCs were obtained during the period of May–June. In June,
August and September, approximately half of the air trajectories originated
from areas in Henan Province, indicating that the air pollutants in Zhengzhou
were impacted by local factors.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1979">Cluster analysis of 48 h backward trajectories for Zhengzhou in
each sampling month using the HYSPLIT code, with the start height at 500 m
altitude and running interval set as 2 h for each day; the percentage of
each cluster and covered areas are presented as well.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1988">The total concentrations of VOCs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are presented in Table 1. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied at the four sites; the highest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and their compositions were not identical across the
sampling months either. In May 2017, the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
reported at JK (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv), followed by GS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv), YH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv) and MEM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv), while the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the months of June, July, August and
September were found to be in the order of GS &gt; JK &gt; MEM &gt; YH, MEM &gt; GS &gt; JK &gt; YH,
YH &gt; MEM &gt; JK &gt; GS and
MEM &gt; YH &gt; GS &gt; JK, respectively. This can be attributed to
numerous factors that will be explored later in the paper.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p id="d1e2099">Wind speed (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured about 10 m above ground level at
every site during the sampling period.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">JK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MEM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">YH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">GS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">May</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jun</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.07</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jul</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.62</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aug</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sep</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2445">Wind rose plot showing wind sector frequency (%) of occurrence
and associated wind speed (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at each site in May and June (the
wind distribution of the other three months is illustrated in Fig. S2), which
were recorded by the anemometers placed at the same site as other air
monitors.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page621?><p id="d1e2466">Besides the emission sources (to be discussed in Sect. 2), the impacts
controlled by meteorological conditions should not be ignored either. For
instance, the prevailing wind in May was northwestern at GS and YH, while
southwestern wind was dominant at JK (Fig. 4). The transport of air
pollutants from the urban center and industrial plants resulted in the
highest level of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at JK. In June 2017, the prevailing wind
was southeastern at MEM, YH and GS (Fig. 4). The average wind speed at GS
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was lower than that at MEM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and YH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Table 2), indicating poor
dispersion conditions at GS. The air pollutants emitted from MEM and YH were
more likely to result in a higher level of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at GS in
June. It should be noted that, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at JK was higher than
that of GS, the level at YH was higher than that of MEM, and vice versa.
Except for the discriminations between the pollution sources at every site,
there may be some other factors (e.g., horizontal and vertical air advection)
that contribute to it.</p>
      <?pagebreak page622?><p id="d1e2575">Due to the variations of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) height, solar
radiation and emission sources, the concentrations of VOCs displayed obvious
differences between morning and afternoon periods (07:00 and 14:00 LT in
this study). Compared with the morning period, the aromatic compounds showed
lower compositions at 14:00 LT (Fig. 5) because of the increased planetary boundary layer and the active photochemical reactions, while alkenes always
peaked at 14:00 LT. According to the dataset, the increases in alkene
compositions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % uplift) were mainly due to higher
contributions of isoprene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % in the morning and 7.6 % in
the afternoon), which was mainly emitted from biogenic sources and increased
exponentially with ambient temperature (Guenther et al., 1993, 1995).</p>
      <p id="d1e2598">The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Zhengzhou (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv)
were significantly lower than those in Beijing (65.6 ppbv), Hangzhou (55.9 ppbv), Guangzhou (47.3 ppbv) and Nanjing (43.5 ppbv), and higher than that
in Wuhan (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv) (Table 3). Factors including population
density, industrial activity, fuel composition, local stringent regulations
for environmental protection, terrain and weather are the potential reasons
for the differences in VOC concentrations in those cities. With regard to
the weight percentage of major<?pagebreak page623?> groups (Table 3), the composition of alkanes
was the largest in all cities because of their longer lifetimes and
widespread sources (Fig. 5), while the composition of aromatics was lower
than alkenes in these cities except for Guangzhou. It is well known that
aromatics mainly originate from solvent usage and vehicle exhaust in summer.
The large number of shoemaking and shipbuilding industries involving large
amounts of solvent usage may be the main reason for the higher composition
of aromatics in Guangzhou. In comparison with the other four cities, the
composition of aromatics in Zhengzhou was the lowest, probably due to solvent usage
in manufacturing being less than in Guangzhou, Hangzhou and Nanjing, and a
lower number of vehicles than in Beijing. Alkyne contributes least to VOCs
in cities listed in Table 3, with a higher level observed in Zhengzhou, which
is ranked second after Hangzhou. Alkyne typically originates from combustion
sources. Zhu et al. (2016) observed that the composition of alkyne in the
biomass-burning period could be double that in the non-biomass-burning
period (Zhu et al., 2016). As Henan is the largest agricultural
province in China and the sampling duration covered the crop harvest season,
the residents often used crop residue as the biofuel for their subsistence; thus a higher alkyne composition in Zhengzhou resulted.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2640">Concentration levels of VOCs and compositions of major groups in
Zhengzhou and other cities in China. TNMHC refers to total non-methane hydrocarbon.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.94}[.94]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Items </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Guangzhou</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">Nanjing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">Beijing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">Hangzhou</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">Wuhan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Zhengzhou</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">March–December</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2011–2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">August</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">July–August</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2013–2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">May–September</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Sampling site </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">residential–commercial</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">transportation–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">residential–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">residential–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">urban</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">urban</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–transportation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">industry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">commercial</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">transportation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mixed area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mixed area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">mixed area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">mixed area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Quantified compounds </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59 NMHC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">56 NMHC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">47 NMHC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">56 NMHC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">99 VOCs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">56 NMHC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Total samples </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">145</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">400</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">TNMHC (ppbv) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">47.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">43.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">55.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Compositions of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>alkane</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">52.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">major groups ( %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>alkene</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>aromatic</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>alkyne</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Reference </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Li and Wang</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">An et al.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Guo et al.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Li et al.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Lyu et al.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">this study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(2012)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2014)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(2012)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(2017b)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(2016)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e3128">Compositions of major organic classes at 07:00 LT <bold>(a)</bold>,
14:00 LT <bold>(b)</bold>
and during the whole sampling period <bold>(c)</bold> at the four sites, and the box plot
for the composition of isoprene at 07:00 and 14:00 LT for each site. The whiskers show the 5–95th percentiles, and the box shows the 25–75th
percentiles. The solid dots represent the arithmetic average, and the line in the box shows the
median <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3151">Temporal variations of mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the four sites during the whole sampling period; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-07 stands
for the concentration level of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed at 07:00 LT, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-14 was that observed
at 14:00 LT.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Temporal variations</title>
      <p id="d1e3233">The time series of mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at every site are shown in Fig. 6. The results showed
distinctive temporal characteristics, whereby lower levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed in July and August
(midsummer) (Table S6). These results were similar to those obtained for
other urban areas worldwide (Cheng et al., 1997; Na et al., 2001; Li and
Wang, 2012). Changes in PBL height, human activities and abundance of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH were the potential causes for this phenomenon. The occurrence
of precipitation, which is usually accompanied with better air dispersion
conditions, is also frequent in most areas of China during summer, resulting
in a decreasing background<?pagebreak page624?> level of air pollutants. Additionally, a series of
effective local policies, such as prohibition of painting and coating in
open air and limitations on fuel supply between 10:00 and 17:00 LT during hot
summer days assisted in suppressing the emissions of VOCs. Meanwhile, many
organizations, such as schools, institutes and scattered private workshops,
were closed due to summer vacation. Some large-scale industries also
stopped manufacturing processes for 2 weeks during this period.
Consequently, the anthropogenic emissions were reduced, which in turn
resulted in a decrease in VOCs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. The
reduction of precursor levels and unfavorable photochemical conditions (such
as higher RH) resulted in the lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in July and August.</p>
      <p id="d1e3354">Beside local emissions, the long-range air mass also had some impacts on
relatively lower level of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in July. As illustrated in
Fig. 3, different from other months, the air current originated, with the
largest portion (ca. 88.7 %), from Hubei Province; the
average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in its capital city (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv)
(Lyu et al., 2016) were lower than those in Zhengzhou (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv). In combination with the lower weight
percentage of photochemically reactive aromatics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), and
the lowest toluene to benzene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> around this
period, it is possible that the cleaner air mass clusters originating from
Hubei also contributed to the reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in July.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3453">The relationship between the mixing ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
composition of alkane. The data points are color coded according to the composition
of aromatic.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3473">As demonstrated in Fig. 6, the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 07:00 LT were often higher than those at 14:00 LT. The accumulation of pollutants
during nighttime and the temperature inversion in the morning were the most
reasonable explanations for this phenomenon. Stronger photochemical reactions
at noon led to the reduction in atmospheric VOCs. It should be
noted that pronounced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were occasionally observed at MEM
and GS (Fig. 7), which were potentially ascribed to sharp changes in local
emissions and meteorological conditions. Specifically, at MEM, the
distinctive increment was always accompanied with obvious increases of
alkanes or aromatics (Fig. 7). Since the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH were often consistent
during the sampling period, the direct gas evaporations should be constant
as well. Therefore, the simultaneous increased concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could illustrate the potential impacts from combustion
sources, such as emissions from nearby thermal power plants. At GS, the
increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in June was usually coincident with extremely high
levels of<?pagebreak page625?> aromatics, due to the disturbance from solvent use for building
renovations during this period, and the abnormal high levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in other months were related to the rising concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alkanes, which were mainly originated from consumptions of
compressed natural gas (CNG) or LPG (Huang et al., 2015). The
results support the possible impact from a gas-fueled power plant located
about 1 km southwest of the site (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of prevailing
western wind at GS during May to September).</p>
      <p id="d1e3579">It is of interest to note that on the morning of 5 September, acetylene
was found in extremely high concentrations (14.7–39.4 ppbv). Its mixing
ratio in most of the urban areas was &lt; 10 ppbv (Duan et al.,
2008; Guo et al., 2012; Louie et al., 2013). The 5 September is a
festival day for people who worship their ancestors. A large number of
incense and offerings, made of wood and paper, were burnt during the
festival, resulting in an elevation of acetylene all over Zhengzhou
(Zhu et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Spatial variations</title>
      <p id="d1e3588">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alkanes, acetylene, ethylene, toluene and benzene were
the most abundant VOCs detected at all sites (Fig. 8), and the mixing ratios
of toluene varied within a wide range at each site because of its universal
emission sources (e.g., vehicle exhaust emissions and solvent usage; Barletta et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2014). These chemicals contributed
&gt; 60 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at each site, illustrating strong
combustion-related sources in Zhengzhou.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e3626">Concentrations of 57 VOCs at each site for the whole sampling
period. The whiskers show the 5–95th percentiles, and the box shows the
25–75th percentiles. The solid points show the arithmetic average, and the line in
the box shows the median. The chemicals are listed in Table S1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3635">Among the four major organic classes, alkane was the most abundant group as
a result of its widespread sources and longevity (Fig. 5), accounting for
52.9 %, 62.5 %, 53.4 % and 53.4 % of the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
JK, MEM, GS and YH, respectively. The highest composition of alkane was
observed at MEM due to the stronger contributions of ethane, isopentane and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> branched alkanes (Fig. S3), which are emitted from
light-duty gasoline vehicles (Wang et al., 2017a).</p>
      <?pagebreak page626?><p id="d1e3667">The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were slightly higher at the industrially
impacted sites of GS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv) and JK (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv)
than those at MEM and YH (Fig. 9). Additionally, the air pollutants related
to the combustion processes, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO, were marginally more
abundant, in western areas of Zhengzhou (GS and MEM) (Fig. 9). Under high
levels of VOCs and sufficient supply of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the highest average mixing
ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed at GS, followed by YH, which
had the lowest VOCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that there are multiple
factors, rather than the absolute concentrations, which contribute to the
formation of the secondary pollutant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at YH.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p id="d1e3764">The distribution of concentration points on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO at each site. The range of the box was
25 %–75 %. The black line in the box stands for median level, and the black
dot represents the average level. The range of whiskers was 5 %–95 %.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3817">In June, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration often exceeded the national standard
level of 80 ppbv; i.e., there was severe air pollution during this period.
The average mixing ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during daytime (07:00–18:00 LT) in June 2017 at
JK, MEM, YH and GS was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">73.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">73.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">88.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv,
respectively (Table 4). The higher level of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at GS was accompanied by the higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv). The weight percentage of
aromatics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) at GS was higher than that at other sites
as well, indicating that the painting and other renovation activities at GS
were potentially an important factor for its high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level in June. Even
though both the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and compounds with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation
potential (such as alkenes and aromatics) at MEM specifically were slightly
higher than those at YH (Table 4), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at MEM was
not higher. This could be attributed to other critical precursors such as
NO. NO at MEM (7.72 ppbv) was significantly higher than that at YH (2.57 ppbv) during daytime, indicating that the titration reaction between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and NO was more efficient at MEM.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><caption><p id="d1e3996">Specific information on VOCs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO at the four sites in
June 2017.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Composition or conc.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">JK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MEM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">YH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">GS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aromatic (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Alkene (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppbv)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppbv)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">74.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">73.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">88.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO (ppbv)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page627?><p id="d1e4160">Because photochemistry producing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurs over several hours to days,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes are attributable, not only to local sources but also to
regional transports. For example, Streets et al. (2007) reported
that with continuous southern winds, its neighboring cities in Hebei contributed
20 %–30 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level in Beijing. During our study, a typical regional ozone pollution occurred on 10 August
at YH (Fig. 6). On that day, the ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the four sites
were all less than 6.5 (ppbC ppbv<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Fig. S4), indicating the existence of a regional
VOC control system and the fact that VOCs are the critical contributors to the
formation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Zhengzhou. The reductions in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the afternoons (around 14:00 LT) compared to mornings (around 07:00 LT) may
have been due, in part, to chemical loss of VOC as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is formed. The
reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and active compounds (i.e.,
aromatic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> alkene) at 14:00 relative to 07:00, 35 % and 56 %
respectively, was the lowest at YH among the four sites (Fig. S4). Based on the
wind direction, between 08:00 and 15:00 LT on 10 August, YH was
downwind of the other three sites (Fig. S4). All of this confirms that the
abnormally high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at YH was caused by the transport of air pollutants
from other sites on that day.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{VOCs/NO_{\mathit{x}}}$} ratio}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio</title>
      <p id="d1e4308">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is often used to distinguish whether a region is
VOC limited or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> limited in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. Generally, VOC-sensitive
regimes occur when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios are lower than 10 in the
morning; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sensitive regimes occur when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios are
greater than 20 (Hanna et al., 1996; Sillman, 1999). In this
study, the mean values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppbC ppbv<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were below 5 at all four
sites (Fig. 10), and 75 % of the data points were &lt; 6, indicating
that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation was sensitive to VOCs in Zhengzhou, and the
reductions of the emissions of VOCs will be a benefit for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
alleviation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4441">The data distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppbC ppbv<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the four sites <bold>(a)</bold>,
and the ratio observed at 07:00 and 14:00 LT <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4483">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed differences among the four sites (Fig. 10), with
the lowest value at MEM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the highest value at JK
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at MEM is more sensitive to
VOCs than at JK due to the presence of strong <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from a thermal power
plant. Approximately 14 % of the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of
&gt; 8.0 were found in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited site of JK, resulting
from higher VOCs or lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions than at other sites. Both of
the mixing ratios and the statistical data showed higher levels of VOCs
(with lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at GS, where only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the ratios
of &gt; 8.0 were observed, indicating that there must be other
factors (unresolved in this study) impacting the variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation regimes.</p>
      <p id="d1e4614">From the daily variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (Fig. 10), higher values
were observed at 14:00 than at 07:00 LT at all four sites, well
correlated with less vehicle emissions or more consumption paths for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with stronger light intensity. The increment of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
14:00 LT was more obvious at JK and GS, suggesting that there are more emission
sources of VOCs at daytime, and resulting the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation system
shifting to the transition area in the afternoon.</p>
      <?pagebreak page628?><p id="d1e4669"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation depends not only on the abundances of precursors (mainly
VOCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but also on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (Sillman,
1999; Pollack et al., 2013). In this research, the mixing ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at 14:00 LT presented a slightly positive trend (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05) with the
uplift of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at JK (Fig. 11), consistent with the results observed
in the megacity of Shanghai (Gao et al., 2017), where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
formation was more sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels were
observed. Without considering the advection of air parcels, this can be
attributed to the increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production efficiency at high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. There were no discernible trends at other sites, possibly due
to the counteraction imposed by other uncertain factors.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p id="d1e4804">The relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 14:00 LT for
each of the four sampling sites.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Ratios of specific compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e4848">Ratios of specific VOCs are useful to identify emission sources (Ho et
al., 2009; Liu et al., 2015; Raysoni et al., 2017). In order to characterize
the differences in the contribution of various sources at each site, ratios
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pentane <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pentane and toluene/benzene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are discussed here.</p>
      <p id="d1e4884">The ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pentane to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pentane can be used to differentiate potential
sources such as the consumption of natural gas, vehicle emissions and fuel
evaporations. In areas heavily impacted by natural gas drilling, the ratios
lie in the range of 0.82–0.89 (Gilman et al., 2013; Abeleira et al.,
2017). Higher values are often reported for automobiles, in the range of 2.2–3.8 for vehicle emissions and 1.8–4.6 for fuel evaporation (McGaughey
et al., 2004; Jobson et al., 2004; Russo et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2013),
whereas ratios below unity were found for coal combustion (0.56–0.80)
(Yan et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e4901">In this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pentane and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pentane were highly correlated
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.94) throughout the whole sampling campaign (Fig. 12),
indicating constant pollution sources for these two compounds. The highest
ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pentane <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pentane was found at JK (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which was
comparable to the value of 2.93 reported in a Pearl River tunnel
(Liu et al., 2008), thus indicating strong impacts from
traffic-related sources. The average ratio at MEM was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
higher than the characteristic ratios for coal combustion, probably due to the
observation site being upwind of the thermal power plant. And frequent idling may cover up the contribution from coal combustion,
reflecting the impact of traffic emissions. The average ratios at YH
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and GS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.63</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were lower than those at the
above two sites, suggesting the comparatively stronger contribution from
coal burning.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p id="d1e5005">Ratios of isopentane (i-pentane) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pentane at every site.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5022">Tunnel and roadside research indicates that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio varies within the
range of 1–2 when the atmosphere is heavily impacted by vehicle emissions
(Wang et al., 2002; Tang et al., 2007; Gentner et al., 2013; Huang et
al., 2015). The ratio of<?pagebreak page629?> &lt; 0.6 was ascribed to other sources such as
coal combustion and biomass burning (Tsai
et al., 2003; Akagi et al., 2011). The industrial activity is more
dominant when the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is greater than 3 (Zhang et al., 2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5051"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and linear correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between
benzene and toluene at every site; the data points are color coded by sampling period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14"><caption><p id="d1e5084">The average ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 07:00 and 14:00 LT for each site
during the whole sampling period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5105">In this study, the correlation between benzene and toluene was fairly good
at all the sites (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.74), except for YH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 14), suggesting similar sources for benzene and toluene at JK, MEM and
GS, while they are more complex at YH, including factors such as variable wind direction. The average
ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were within the range of 1.64–2.29, and were scattered
around the characteristic ratio of 2 for vehicle exhaust, illustrating the
significance of vehicle emissions at the four sites. Specifically, at JK,
MEM and YH, most <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were distributed between 0.6 and 3, which
corresponded to characteristic ratios for coal or biomass burning and
industrial activities, respectively. These reflected the mixture of impacts
from automobiles and coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning at these three sites. However, more
values were greater than 3 at GS, suggesting more frequent disturbance from
industrial activities at this site.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5172">Factor profiles of major emission sources, namely vehicle emissions,
coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning, solvent usage, oil gas evaporation, petrochemical
source and biogenic source resolved by positive matrix factorization (PMF) model.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5188">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios at 14:00 LT were lower than at 07:00 LT (Fig. 15). The
reaction rate constant of toluene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.63</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH was higher
than that for benzene (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating a more rapid
consumption of toluene from photochemical reactions, thus resulting in
lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios at 14:00 LT, all else being equal. The emission strength of
automobiles is often weaker at 14:00 LT, while coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning
are increased due to more human activities. Both chemistry and emissions
offer an explanation of the lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios observed at 14:00 LT. In
comparison with other months, higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were found more frequently
in September, potentially showing increased industrial activities during
this period.</p>
      <p id="d1e5357">Overall, based on the isopentane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pentane) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, the atmospheric
VOCs at every site were impacted by a mix of coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning and
vehicle emissions, whereas GS was more likely to be impacted by industry-related
sources.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>Relative reactivity of VOCs</title>
      <p id="d1e5392">The reactivity of individual species is different, and in mixtures of VOCs
there is competition for reaction partners, leading to variations in
reaction pathways and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation yields. Ozone formation potential
(OFP) is a useful tool to estimate the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production of each
compound under optimum conditions, from which the most important species for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation can be identified (Carter, 1994). The calculation
of OFP is based on the mixing ratios and maximum incremental reactivity (MIR) of
each individual compound, given in Eq. (4):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M336" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OFP</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MIR</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the concentration level of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th species and MIR is a constant taken from Carter (2010; Table S2).</p>
      <p id="d1e5469">In Zhengzhou, alkenes contribute most (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) to the sum
of OFP, of which ethylene had the largest portion. The results are different
with the estimation based on emission inventories by Wu
and Xie (2017), in which the largest contributor of total OFP in the NCP, YRD and PRD was aromatics, reflecting the fact that there were relatively
fewer surface-coating industries in Zhengzhou.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5487">Top 10 VOCs ranked according to calculated ozone formation
potential (OFP) and their corresponding percentage weighted by mixing ratio.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">OFP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Weighted</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Weighted</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Site</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">OFP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Weighted</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Weighted</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(ppbv)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">by OFP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">by mixing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(ppbv)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">by OFP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">by mixing</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">ratio</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">JK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ethylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">MEM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Ethylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">30.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Isoprene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Isoprene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Xylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Toluene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.99</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Toluene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Propylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Propylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Acetylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Acetylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Xylene<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Butane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Butane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">5.97</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Xylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Isopentane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Isopentane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Ethane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">23.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Propane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Propane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">10.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">YH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ethylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Ethylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">26.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.51</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Isoprene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Isoprene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4.64</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Toluene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Toluene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">5.49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Xylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Propylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Acetylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Xylene<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Propylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Acetylene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-2-Pentene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Butane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">6.39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Butane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Isopentane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">6.94</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Isopentane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Propane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">11.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Propane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Isobutane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4.59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e5490"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Xylene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene are co-eluted in the chromatographic separation.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e6426">For the individual species, the top 10 highest contributors in OFP included
ethylene, isoprene, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene, toluene, propylene, acetylene, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butane,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pentane and propane. Their contributions to the sum of OFP were within
the range of 69.4 %–77.6 % (Table 5), with 61.3 %–76.5 % of total VOCs
weighted by concentration, highlighting the importance of reduction of emissions of these VOCs, whether based on relative reactivity or mixing
ratios. Additionally, it is worth noting that the percentage of acetylene
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.51</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) weighted by OFP was higher than many other areas in
China, including Guangzhou (2.20 %) and the YRD (2.37 %) (Li and Wang,
2012; Jia et al., 2016), demonstrating that it is necessary to conduct
emission controls on sources related to combustion (i.e., vehicle emissions
and biofuel burning) in Zhengzhou.</p>
      <p id="d1e6470">Zhengzhou suffered from the most severe <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution in June 2017.
The relationships between the OFP of each organic group and the ambient concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as the
corresponding meteorological conditions, are shown in Figs. S5–S6. At 07:00 LT, generally lower WS was seen compared to that at 14:00 LT, showing
favorable conditions for local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> propagation. Under low RHs and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and OFP
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">88.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level at YH was unexpectedly lower than
that at MEM on sunny days. Since the OFP<?pagebreak page630?> was estimated with the assumption
of reactions that proceeded under optimum conditions, the above phenomenon
shows that there were unsatisfactory <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation conditions at YH. The
highest total OFP was seen at JK in June, while the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels
were observed at GS, located in a downwind position with the lowest WS
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The concentration level of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> usually
increased with wind speed (Fig. S7), particularly when the eastern wind was
dominant, illustrating the disturbance from long-distance sources to the urban
center.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <title>Source apportionment</title>
      <p id="d1e6600">The factor profiles given by PMF for each site are presented in Fig. 15.
The six factors were classified as vehicle emissions, coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning,
solvent use, oil evaporation, petrochemical source and biogenic source (detailed
characterization is given in the Supplement) on the basis of
the corresponding markers for each source category, which are summarized
in Table S7. Meanwhile, the correlation coefficients, expressed as Pearson's
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, varied from 0.54 to 0.62 and 0.66 to 0.73 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with vehicle emissions, respectively
(Fig. 16), which prove the precise results gained in this study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16"><caption><p id="d1e6648">Correlation analysis relating source-apportioned VOC contributions
of coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning <bold>(a)</bold> and vehicle emissions <bold>(b)</bold>
with co-located measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each site (rows).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6692">The weight percentage of each factor calculated using two criteria (absolute
concentrations and OFPs) at the four sites is presented in Fig. 17. At
every site, vehicle emissions, coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning and solvent use were
the top three contributors to VOCs' abundance in ambient air. Compared<?pagebreak page631?> to JK
and YH, even though the distances between the thermal power plant and the
observation site were the shortest at MEM, vehicle emissions (36.8 %) showed
the largest portion instead. Coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning (30.6 %) had the
highest contribution at GS, attributed to its downwind position and nearby
suburbs that biomass burning occurred more frequently. The contributions
from vehicle emissions at the two urban centers of MEM (36.8 %) and YH
(37.4 %) were comparable, but higher than those at JK and YH. The
consumptions of solvent at GS (18.9 %) and JK (14.9 %) were higher than
those at YH (10.1 %) and MEM (11.5 %), due to restriction on development
of new industrial enterprises in urban center in recent years. Emissions
from oil evaporation, petrochemical sources and biogenic sources were scarce, and
their contributions were below 10 % at every site.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F17" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6712">Source apportionment results during the whole sampling period. The
results weighted by observed concentrations are shaded in pink,
and the results estimated based on OFP are shaded in light blue.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f17.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F18" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6723">Probable source regions apportioned by PSCF in Zhengzhou in summer
(June–August 2017) during the sampling period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/617/2019/acp-19-617-2019-f18.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6732">On the base of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation impact, coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning, solvent
use, and vehicle emissions were the three major contributors as well. In
contrast to the concentration<?pagebreak page632?> weighted method, the importance of solvent use
estimated with OFP increased 28 %–65 % for each site, and the significance
of vehicle emissions decreased 29 %–53 %. At YH and GS, a small discrimination
(&lt; 4 %) in the contributions of coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning was found between the two
methods. On the other hand, the variations in coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass
burning at JK (a decline of 17 %) and MEM (an increase of 29 %) were
more obvious, due to a low abundance of reactive species with this factor at JK
and a high level of alkenes at MEM. The aging index of xylene / ethylbenzene was remarkably high at MEM (2.97) and low at JK
(0.01),
demonstrating that the emission sources related to coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning
were fresher at MEM than JK.</p>
      <p id="d1e6774">Except for oil gas evaporation and biogenic sources, of which major emitted
compounds have a shorter life span, potential source regions for the other
four identified sources (i.e., coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning, vehicle emissions,
solvent usage and petrochemical source) apportioned by the PSCF method are presented
in Fig. 18. The southwest of Shanxi Province, the west of Shandong Province and
the southwest of Henan Province were identified as hotspots for coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning. The active emission areas for solvent use were
concentrated in Henan Province and were mainly located in the southwest of
Zhengzhou. The area with the highest contribution from the petrochemical source was found
in the southwest of both Shanxi and Henan, the northwest of Anhui and the southeast of
Hubei. For vehicle emissions, the strongest emission point was in the southwest of Henan, while
other strong emission points were distributed in Shandong, Anhui and Hubei provinces.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS8">
  <title>Consumption of VOCs and correlations with ozone level</title>
      <p id="d1e6797">The consumption of a VOC in the atmosphere could be presented as the
difference between its initial mixing ratio and the observed value following an
air parcel. In isolated stagnant air, the rate of change of VOC
concentrations will be the sum of emissions, deposition, chemical
production and loss processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e6800">The average value of VOC consumption in the urban center (MEM and YH, 4–6 ppbv)
was lower than that in outer areas (JK and GS, 9–11 ppbv), and the average
increment of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 14:00 LT was higher than that at 07:00 LT in
marginal areas, suggesting more efficient photochemical reactions at JK and
GS. Meanwhile, the average values of [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each
site, ranked in the same order as VOCs' consumption, varied in the range
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s. The values
were slightly lower than the results of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s
measured at Beijing in August–September 2010 (Yuan et al.,<?pagebreak page633?> 2012),
indicating a comparatively lower impact of the aging process in Zhengzhou.</p>
      <p id="d1e6901">Taking the decrement of VOCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as independent variables and the
increment of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a dependent variable, the multiple regression analysis
was performed. The results for JK and GS are presented as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math id="M402" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">increment</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOC</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">decrement</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">decrement</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">JK</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">increment</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOC</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">decrement</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">decrement</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GS</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for JK and GS were 16.1 and 10.1, respectively, indicating that the
regression results at the two sites were acceptable. However, the
relationships among <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOCs could not be expressed in
this way at MEM and YH, where there were low values for both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.12, 0.09)
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.7, 2.8). This is potentially attributed to more constant
disturbance from fresh emission sources in the urban center.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e7144">In this study, VOC samples were collected at four sites in Zhengzhou, Henan
(China), for the first time and analyzed for 57 species. It is found that the
weighted percentage of aromatics was lower, while the percentage of alkyne was higher in
Zhengzhou than in other Chinese cities. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alkanes,
acetylene, ethylene, toluene and benzene were the most abundant VOCs in the
region, suggesting widespread combustion-related sources in the city. Median
concentrations for the four sites are almost indistinguishable but, based on
monthly averages, the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed at the GS site
because it is occasionally impacted by emissions from the nearby gas fueled
plant, which strongly skew the distribution of measured VOC concentrations.
Approximately 75 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were below 6 at each site,
indicating that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation was driven by VOCs regionally.
Different from other megacities, alkenes were the biggest contributors to
OFP, and acetylene was particularly critical at each site. In addition, the
impact of the aging process is lower in Zhengzhou than in Beijing.
Photochemical processing appears to be more efficient at JK and GS, while
the relationships among <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOCs at the urban sites of MEM and
YH were more complex.</p>
      <?pagebreak page635?><p id="d1e7229">Our analysis of ozone formation does not take into account the important
effects of transport and mixing, and should be viewed in this light. Both
measured mixing ratios and calculated OFPs demonstrated that the most
important contributors to VOCs were vehicle exhaust, coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass burning
and solvent use, illustrating the necessity of conducting emission controls on
these pollution sources. Vehicle emissions were more dominant in the urban center
(YH and MEM), while solvent use was more important at the sites (JK and GS)
far away from the urban center of Zhengzhou. It is further shown that the air
pollution in Zhengzhou was usually impacted by local emissions, with no more
than 50 % of 48 h backward trajectories extending out of Henan Province
in June, August and September; southern air clusters from
Hubei Province were occasionally cleaner. In addition, strong emissions for coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biomass
burning were concentrated in the southwest of Shanxi, the west of Shandong and
the southwest of Henan according to the PSCF analysis. Due to less anthropogenic emissions and more favorable dispersion conditions, most of
the air pollutants showed lowest levels in the midsummer month of July.
This study provides first-hand information on the characteristics of
VOCs and assists in overcoming the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution issue in Zhengzhou, China.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e7261">The data in this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request
(stevenho@hkpsrl.org or gongsl@cma.gov.cn).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e7264">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-617-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-617-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e7273">JN and  HL designed the research. YQ and DZ conducted the measurements.
LH and YY analyzed the data. BL wrote the paper. SSHH and SG reviewed and commented on the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e7279">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e7285">The authors would like to thank for valuable suggestions, corrections and
discussions from both anonymous referees and the editor, Rob MacKenzie.
Their comments are particularly important and greatly contributed to
the improvement of this work. This research was supported by the Key Program of National Natural
Science Foundation of China (grant no. 91744209 and 91544232).
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Rob MacKenzie<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abeleira, A., Pollack, I. B., Sive, B., Zhou, Y., Fischer, E. V., and
Farmer, D. K.: Source characterization of volatile organic compounds in the
Colorado Northern Front Range Metropolitan Area during spring and summer
2015, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
122, 3595–3613, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026227" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016jd026227</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S., Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4039–4072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>An, J., Zhu, B., Wang, H., Li, Y., Lin, X., and Yang, H.: Characteristics
and source apportionment of VOCs measured in an industrial area of Nanjing,
Yangtze River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 97, 206–214,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.021</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Barletta, B., Meinardi, S., Sherwood Rowland, F., Chan, C.-Y., Wang, X.,
Zou, S., Yin Chan, L., and Blake, D. R.: Volatile organic compounds in 43
Chinese cities, Atmos. Environ., 39, 5979–5990,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.06.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.06.029</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Borbon, A., Locoge, N., Veillerot, M., Galloo, J. C., and Guillermo, R.:
Characterisation of NMHCs in a French urban atmosphere: overview of the main
sources, Sci. Total Environ., 292, 177–191, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, W. P. L.: Development of Ozone Reactivity Scales for Volatile
Organic Compounds, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 44, 881–899,
1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Carter, W. P. L.: Development of the SAPRC-07 Chemical Mechanism and Updated
Ozone Reactivity Scales, available at:
<uri>https://www.cert.ucr.edu/~carter/SAPRC</uri> (last access: 13 March 2018), 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chen, W. T., Shao, M., Lu, S. H., Wang, M., Zeng, L. M., Yuan, B., and Liu, Y.: Understanding primary and secondary
sources of ambient carbonyl compounds in Beijing using the PMF model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3047–3062, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3047-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3047-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, L., Fu, L., Angle, R. P., and Sandhu, H. S.: Seasonal variations of
volatile organic compounds in Edmonton, Alberta, Atmos. Environ., 31,
239–246, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection: Ambient Air Quality Index
(AQI) Technical Provisions (Trial), available at:
<uri>http://kjs.mee.gov.cn/hjbhbz/bzwb/jcffbz/201203/t20120302_224166.shtml</uri> (last access: 3 November 2018), 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Choek, D. P. and Heuss, J. M.: Urban ozone and its precursors, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 21, 1146–1153, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Duan, J., Tan, J., Yang, L., Wu, S., and Hao, J.: Concentration, sources and
ozone formation potential of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during ozone
episode in Beijing, Atmos. Res., 88, 25–35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.09.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.09.004</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Fujita, E. M.: Hydrocarbon source apportionment for the 1996 Paso del Norte
Ozone Study, Sci. Total Environ., 276, 171–184, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Fujita, E. M., Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., and Lu, Z.: Validation of the
chemical mass balance receptor model applied to hydrocarbon source
apportionment in the southern California air quality study, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 28, 1633–1649, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Gao, W., Tie, X., Xu, J., Huang, R., Mao, X., Zhou, G., and Chang, L.:
Long-term trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a mega City (Shanghai), China:
Characteristics, causes, and interactions with precursors, Sci. Total
Environ., 603–604, 425–433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.099" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.099</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Geng, N., Wang, J., Xu, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, C., and Zhang, R.: PM2.5 in an
industrial district of Zhengzhou, China: Chemical composition and source
apportionment, Particuology, 11, 99–109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2012.08.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.partic.2012.08.004</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Gentner, D. R., Worton, D. R., Isaacman, G., Davis, L. C., Dallmann, T. R.,
Wood, E. C., Herndon, S. C., Goldstein, A. H., and Harley, R. A.: Chemical
composition of gas-phase organic carbon emissions from motor vehicles and
implications for ozone production, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11837–11848,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es401470e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es401470e</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Gilman, J. B., Lerner, B. M., Kuster, W. C., and de Gouw, J. A.: Source
signature of volatile organic compounds from oil and natural gas operations
in northeastern Colorado, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 1297–1305,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es304119a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es304119a</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gong, M., Yin, S., Gu, X., Xu, Y., Jiang, N., and Zhang, R.: Refined
2013-based vehicle emission inventory and its spatial and temporal
characteristics in Zhengzhou, China, Sci. Total Environ.,<?pagebreak page636?> 599–600,
1149–1159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.299" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.299</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T.,
Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., McKay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B.,
Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmerman, P.: A global
model of natural volatile organic compound emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 100,
8873–8892, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A. B., Zimmerman, P. R., and Harley, P. C.: Isoprene and
monoterpene emission rate variability: model evaluations and sensitivity
analyses, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 12609–12617, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Cheng, H. R., Ling, Z. H., Louie, P. K., and Ayoko, G. A.: Which
emission sources are responsible for the volatile organic compounds in the
atmosphere of Pearl River Delta?, J. Hazard. Mater., 188, 116–124,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.081</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Ling, Z. H., Cheng, H. R., Simpson, I. J., Lyu, X. P., Wang, X. M.,
Shao, M., Lu, H. X., Ayoko, G., Zhang, Y. L., Saunders, S. M., Lam, S. H.
M., Wang, J. L., and Blake, D. R.: Tropospheric volatile organic compounds
in China, Sci. Total Environ., 574, 1021–1043,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.116</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Tan, J., Duan, J., Ma, Y., Yang, F., He, K., and Hao, J.:
Characteristics of atmospheric non-methane hydrocarbons during haze episode
in Beijing, China, Environ. Monit. Assess., 184, 7235–7246,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2493-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10661-011-2493-9</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Haagen-Smit, A. T.: Chemistry and physiology of Los Angeles smog, J. Ind.
Eng. Chem., 44, 1342–1346, 1952.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hanna, S. R., Moore, G. E., and Fernau, M.: Evaluation of photochemical grid
models (UAM-IV, UAM-V, and the ROM/UAM-IV couple) using data from the Lake
Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS), Atmos. Environ., 30, 3265–3279, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hidy, G. M. and Blanchard, C. L.: Precursor reductions and ground-level
ozone in the Continental United States, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.,
65, 1261–1282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1079564" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10962247.2015.1079564</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Ho, K. F., Lee, S. C., Ho, W. K., Blake, D. R., Cheng, Y., Li, Y. S., Ho, S. S. H., Fung, K., Louie, P. K. K., and Park, D.:
Vehicular emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from a tunnel study in Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7491–7504,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7491-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7491-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hopke, P. K., Barrie, L. A., Li, S.-M., Cheng, M.-D.,  Li, C., and Xie, Y.:
Possible sources and preferred pathways for biogenic and non-sea-salt sulfur
for the high Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 16595–16603, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Ling, Z. H., Lee, S. C., Ho, S. S. H., Cao, J. J., Blake, D. R.,
Cheng, Y., Lai, S. C., Ho, K. F., Gao, Y., Cui, L., and Louie, P. K. K.:
Characterization of volatile organic compounds at a roadside environment in
Hong Kong: An investigation of influences after air pollution control
strategies, Atmos. Environ., 122, 809–818, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.036</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Jia, C., Mao, X., Huang, T., Liang, X., Wang, Y., Shen, Y., Jiang, W., Wang,
H., Bai, Z., Ma, M., Yu, Z., Ma, J., and Gao, H.: Non-methane hydrocarbons
(NMHCs) and their contribution to ozone formation potential in a
petrochemical industrialized city, Northwest China, Atmos. Res., 169,
225–236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.10.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.10.006</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Jin, X. and Holloway, T.: Spatial and temporal variability of ozone
sensitivity over China observed from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7229–7246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023250" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015jd023250</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Jobson, B. T., Berkowitz, C. M., Kuster, W. C., Goldan, P. D., Williams, E.
J., Fesenfeld, F. C., Apel, E. C., Karl, T., Lonneman, W. A., and Riemer,
D.: Hydrocarbon source signatures in Houston, Texas: Influence of the
petrochemical industry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109,
D24305,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004887" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd004887</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Lau, A. K., Yuan, Z., Yu, J. Z., and Louie, P. K.: Source apportionment of
ambient volatile organic compounds in Hong Kong, Sci. Total Environ., 408,
4138–4149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.025</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Li, B., Ho, S. S. H., Xue, Y., Huang, Y., Wang, L., Cheng, Y., Dai, W.,
Zhong, H., Cao, J., and Lee, S.: Characterizations of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) from vehicular emissions at roadside environment: The first
comprehensive study in Northwestern China, Atmos. Environ., 161, 1–12,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.029</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Li, K., Chen, L., Ying, F., White, S. J., Jang, C., Wu, X., Gao, X., Hong,
S., Shen, J., Azzi, M., and Cen, K.: Meteorological and chemical impacts on
ozone formation: A case study in Hangzhou, China, Atmos. Res.,
196, 40–52, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.003</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Li, L. and Wang, X.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of atmospheric
non-methane hydrocarbons in Guangzhou, China, Inter. J. Env. Res. Pub.
Heal., 9, 1859–1873, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9051859" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/ijerph9051859</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Li, L., Chen, Y., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Xie, S., Chen, W., Lu, S., Wu, Y., and
Cao, W.: Biomass burning contribution to ambient volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) in the Chengdu–Chongqing Region (CCR), China, Atmos. Environ., 99,
403–410, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.067</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Li, Q., Zhang, L., Wang, T., Wang, Z., Fu, X., and Zhang, Q.: “New” Reactive
Nitrogen Chemistry Reshapes the Relationship of Ozone to Its Precursors,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 2810–2818, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05771" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b05771</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, X., Traner, M., and Liu, S. C.: On the Nonlinearity of the Tropospheric
Ozone Production, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 93, 15879–15888, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Liu, B., Liang, D., Yang, J., Dai, Q., Bi, X., Feng, Y., Yuan, J., Xiao, Z.,
Zhang, Y., and Xu, H.: Characterization and source apportionment of volatile
organic compounds based on 1-year of observational data in Tianjin, China,
Environ. Pollut., 218, 757–769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.072" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.072</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Liu, H., Liu, S., Xue, B., Lv, Z., Meng, Z., Yang, X., Xue, T., Yu, Q., and
He, K.: Ground-level ozone pollution and its health impacts in China, Atmos.
Environ., 173, 223–230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.014</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Shao, M., Fu, L., Lu, S., Zeng, L., and Tang, D.: Source profiles
of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured in China: Part I, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 6247–6260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.070" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.070</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Yuan, B., Li, X., Shao, M., Lu, S., Li, Y., Chang, C.-C., Wang, Z., Hu, W., Huang, X., He, L., Zeng, L., Hu, M.,
and Zhu, T.: Impact of pollution controls in Beijing on atmospheric oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) during
the 2008 Olympic Games: observation and modeling implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3045–3062, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3045-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3045-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page637?><ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Louie, P. K. K., Ho, J. W. K., Tsang, R. C. W., Blake, D. R., Lau, A. K. H.,
Yu, J. Z., Yuan, Z., Wang, X., Shao, M., and Zhong, L.: VOCs and OVOCs
distribution and control policy implications in Pearl River Delta region,
China, Atmos. Environ., 76, 125–135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.058</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Luecken, D. J., Napelenok, S. L., Strum, M., Scheffe, R., and Phillips, S.:
Sensitivity of Ambient Atmospheric Formaldehyde and Ozone to Precursor
Species and Source Types Across the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 4668–4675, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05509" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b05509</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Lyu, X. P., Chen, N., Guo, H., Zhang, W. H., Wang, N., Wang, Y., and Liu,
M.: Ambient volatile organic compounds and their effect on ozone production
in Wuhan, central China, Sci. Total Environ., 541, 200–209,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.093</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Malley, C. S., Braban, C. F., Dumitrean, P., Cape, J. N., and Heal, M. R.: The impact of speciated VOCs on regional
ozone increment derived from measurements at the UK EMEP supersites between 1999 and 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8361–8380, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8361-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8361-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>McGaughey, G. R., Desai, N. R., Allen, D. T., Seila, R. L., Lonneman, W. A.,
Fraser, M. P., Harley, R. A., Pollack, A. K., Ivy, J. M., and Price, J. H.:
Analysis of motor vehicle emissions in a Houston tunnel during the Texas Air
Quality Study 2000, Atmos. Environ., 38, 3363–3372,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.006</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Na, K., Kim, Y. P., Moon, K.-C., Moon, I., and Fung, K.: Concentrations of
volatile organic compounds in an industrial area of Korea, Atmos. Environ.,
35, 2747–2756, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Nagashima, T., Sudo, K., Akimoto, H., Kurokawa, J., and Ohara, T.: Long-term change in the source contribution to surface
ozone over Japan, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8231–8246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8231-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-8231-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Oliver, K. D., Adams, J. R., Daughtrey Jr., E. H., Mcclenny, W. A., Yoong, M. J.,
and Pardee, M. A.: Technique for monitoring ozone precursor hydrocarbons in
air at photochemical assessment monitoring stations: sorbent
preconcentration, closed-cycle cooler cryofocusing, and GC-FID analysis,
Atmos. Environ., 30, 2751–2757, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Ou, J., Zheng, J., Li, R., Huang, X., Zhong, Z., Zhong, L., and Lin, H.:
Speciated OVOC and VOC emission inventories and their implications for
reactivity-based ozone control strategy in the Pearl River Delta region,
China, Sci. Total Environ., 530–531, 393–402,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.062</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Ou, J., Yuan, Z., Zheng, J., Huang, Z., Shao, M., Li, Z., Huang, X., Guo,
H., and Louie, P. K.: Ambient Ozone Control in a Photochemically Active
Region: Short-Term Despiking or Long-Term Attainment?, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 50, 5720–5728, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00345" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b00345</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Polissar, A. V., Hopke, P. K., Paatero, P., Kaufmann, Y. J., Hall, D. K.,
Bodhaine, B. A., Dutton, E. G., and Harris, J. M.: The aerosol at Barrow,
Alaska: long-term trends and source locations, Atmos. Environ., 33,
2441–2458, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Pollack, I. B., Ryerson, T. B., Trainer, M., Neuman, J. A., Roberts, J. M.,
and Parrish, D. D.: Trends in ozone, its precursors, and related secondary
oxidation products in Los Angeles, California: A synthesis of measurements
from 1960 to 2010, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5893–5911,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50472" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50472</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Raysoni, A. U., Stock, T. H., Sarnat, J. A., Chavez, M. C., Sarnat, S. E.,
Montoya, T., Holguin, F., and Li, W. W.: Evaluation of VOC concentrations in
indoor and outdoor microenvironments at near-road schools, Environ. Pollut.,
231, 681–693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.065</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Russo, R. S., Zhou, Y., White, M. L., Mao, H., Talbot, R., and Sive, B. C.: Multi-year (2004–2008) record of
nonmethane hydrocarbons and halocarbons in New England: seasonal variations and regional sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4909–4929,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4909-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4909-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Shao, M., Lu, S., Liu, Y., Xie, X., Chang, C., Huang, S., and Chen, Z.:
Volatile organic compounds measured in summer in Beijing and their role in
ground-level ozone formation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114,
114, D00G06, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010863" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd010863</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Shao, M., Wang, B., Lu, S., Yuan, B., and Wang, M.: Effects of Beijing
Olympics Control Measures on Reducing Reactive Hydrocarbon Species, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 45, 514–519, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Shao, P., An, J., Xin, J., Wu, F., Wang, J., Ji, D., and Wang, Y.: Source
apportionment of VOCs and the contribution to photochemical ozone formation
during summer in the typical industrial area in the Yangtze River Delta,
China, Atmos. Res., 176–177, 64–74, doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.015, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Shen, F., Ge, X., Hu, J., Nie, D., Tian, L., and Chen, M.: Air pollution
characteristics and health risks in Henan Province, China, Environ. Res.,
156, 625–634, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.04.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envres.2017.04.026</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Shiu, C.-J., Liu, S. C., Chang, C.-C., Chen, J.-P., Chou, C. C. K., Lin,
C.-Y., and Young, C.-Y.: Photochemical production of ozone and control
strategy for Southern Taiwan, Atmos. Environ., 41, 9324–9340,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.014</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Sillman, S.: The relation between ozone, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hydrocarbons in urban and
polluted rural environments, Atmos. Environ., 33, 1821–1845, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Streets, D. G., Fu, J. S., Jang, C. J., Hao, J., He, K., Tang, X., Zhang,
Y., Wang, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Wang, B., and Yu, C.: Air quality
during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, Atmos. Environ., 41, 480–492,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.046</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Sun, J., Wu, F., Hu, B., Tang, G., Zhang, J., and Wang, Y.: VOC
characteristics, emissions and contributions to SOA formation during hazy
episodes, Atmos. Environ., 141, 560–570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.060</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Tang, J. H., Chan, L. Y., Chan, C. Y., Li, Y. S., Chang, C. C., Liu, S. C.,
Wu, D., and Li, Y. D.: Characteristics and diurnal variations of NMHCs at
urban, suburban, and rural sites in the Pearl River Delta and a remote site
in South China, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8620–8632,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.029</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Tsai, S. M., Zhang, J. J., Smith, K. R., Ma, Y., Rasmussen, R. A., and
Khalil, M. A. K.: Characterization of Non-methane Hydrocarbons Emitted from
Various Cookstoves Used in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 2869–2877,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>US EPA: Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS), available at:
<uri>https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/pamsmain.html</uri> (last access: 3 December
2018), 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
US EPA: Compendium Method TO-15: Determination of volatile organic compounds
in air collected in specially prepared<?pagebreak page638?> canisters and analyzed by gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
US EPA: National air pollutant emission trends 1900–1998, Off. Air Qual.
Plann. Stand., Research Triangle Park, N. C, Rep. EPA 454/R-00-002, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Qiao, Y., Chen, C., Lu, J., Qiao, L., and Lou, S.: Source Profiles
and Chemical Reactivity of Volatile Organic Compounds from Solvent Use in
Shanghai, China, Aerosol Air Qual. Res.,
14, 301–310,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.03.0064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2013.03.0064</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H.-L., Jing, S.-A., Lou, S.-R., Hu, Q.-Y., Li, L., Tao, S.-K., Huang,
C., Qiao, L.-P., and Chen, C.-H.: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) source
profiles of on-road vehicle emissions in China, Sci. Total Environ.,
607–608, 253–261, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.001</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Shao, M., Lu, S.-H., Yang, Y.-D., and Chen, W.-T.: Evidence of
coal combustion contribution to ambient VOCs during winter in Beijing, Chin.
Chem. Lett., 24, 829–832, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2013.05.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cclet.2013.05.029</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Shao, M., Chen, W., Lu, S., Liu, Y., Yuan, B., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Q., Chang, C.-C., Wang, B., Zeng, L., Hu, M.,
Yang, Y., and Li, Y.: Trends of non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) emissions in Beijing during 2002–2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
1489–1502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1489-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1489-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Q., Li, S., Dong, M., Li, W., Gao, X., Ye, R., and Zhang, D.: VOCs
emission characteristics and priority control analysis based on VOCs
emission inventories and ozone formation potentials in Zhoushan, Atmos.
Environ., 182, 234–241, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Wang, T., Xue, L., Brimblecombe, P., Lam, Y. F., Li, L., and Zhang, L.:
Ozone pollution in China: A review of concentrations, meteorological
influences, chemical precursors, and effects, Sci. Total Environ., 575,
1582–1596, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.081</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X.-M., Sheng, G.-Y., Fu, J.-M., Chan, C.-Y., Lee, S.-C., Chan, L. Y.,
and Wang, Z.-S.: Urban roadside aromatic hydrocarbons in three cities of the
Pearl River Delta, People's Republic of China, Atmos. Environ., 36,
5141–5148, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Wei, W., Cheng, S., Li, G., Wang, G., and Wang, H.: Characteristics of ozone
and ozone precursors (VOCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) around a petroleum refinery in Beijing,
China, J. Environ. Sci.-China, 26, 332–342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-0742(13)60412-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1001-0742(13)60412-x</ext-link>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Wu, R. and Xie, S.: Spatial Distribution of Ozone Formation in China
Derived from Emissions of Speciated Volatile Organic Compounds, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 2574–2583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03634" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03634</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Xue, Y., Ho, S. S. H., Huang, Y., Li, B., Wang, L., Dai, W., Cao, J., and
Lee, S.: Source apportionment of VOCs and their impacts on surface ozone in
an industry city of Baoji, Northwestern China, Sci. Rep., 7, 9979,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10631-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-10631-4</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Yan, Y., Peng, L., Li, R., Li, Y., Li, L., and Bai, H.: Concentration, ozone
formation potential and source analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
in a thermal power station centralized area: A study in Shuozhou, China,
Environ. Pollut., 223, 295–304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.026</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Yuan, B., Shao, M., de Gouw, J., Parrish, D. D., Lu, S., Wang, M., Zeng, L.,
Zhang, Q., Song, Y., Zhang, J., and Hu, M.: Volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) in urban air: How chemistry affects the interpretation of positive
matrix factorization (PMF) analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117,
117, D24302,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018236" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012jd018236</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Lu, S., Huang, Z., Huang, X., and Wang, Y.:
Ambient air benzene at background sites in China's most developed coastal
regions: exposure levels, source implications and health risks, Sci. Total
Environ., 511, 792–800, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.003</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, Y., Yang, L., Chen, J., Wang, X., Xue, L., Sui, X., Wen, L., Xu, C.,
Yao, L., Zhang, J., Shao, M., Lu, S., and Wang, W.: Characteristics of
ambient volatile organic compounds and the influence f biomass burning at a
rural site in Northern China during summer 2013, Atmos. Environ., 124,
156–165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.097" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.097</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Characterization of VOCs and their related atmospheric processes in a central Chinese city during severe ozone pollution periods</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>A 5-month campaign (from May to September 2017) was conducted to
characterize volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for the first time at four
sites in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China, where ground level ozone
(O<sub>3</sub>) concentration has shown an increasing trend in recent years. Canister
samples were collected for the measurement of 57 VOCs, which, along with
reactive nitrogen oxides (NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>), are the most important O<sub>3</sub> precursors.
During the same period, O<sub>3</sub> and its precursor gases were monitored online
simultaneously. The results indicated that the average mixing ratio of total
quantified VOCs (Σ<sub>VOCs</sub> = 28.8±22.1&thinsp;ppbv) in Zhengzhou
was lower than that in the other Chinese megacities, while alkyne comprised a
higher proportion of Σ<sub>VOCs</sub>. The abundances, compositions and ratios
of typical VOCs showed clear spatial and temporal variations. Cluster
analysis indicates that air masses from the south of Zhengzhou were cleaner than
from other directions. The molar ratio of VOCs to NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> indicated that,
in general, O<sub>3</sub> formation was more sensitive to VOCs than NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>
formation in Zhengzhou. The source apportionment was conducted with positive
matrix factorization (PMF), and it was found that vehicle exhaust, coal and
biomass burning and solvent usage were the major sources for ambient VOCs at
all four sites. From potential source contribution function (PSCF) analysis,
the strong emissions from coal&thinsp;+&thinsp;biomass burning and solvent usage were
concentrated in the southwest of Shanxi and Henan provinces. This
study gathers scientific evidence on the pollution sources for Zhengzhou, benefiting the government to establish efficient environmental control
measures, particularly for O<sub>3</sub> pollution.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abeleira, A., Pollack, I. B., Sive, B., Zhou, Y., Fischer, E. V., and
Farmer, D. K.: Source characterization of volatile organic compounds in the
Colorado Northern Front Range Metropolitan Area during spring and summer
2015, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
122, 3595–3613, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026227" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026227</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S., Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4039–4072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
An, J., Zhu, B., Wang, H., Li, Y., Lin, X., and Yang, H.: Characteristics
and source apportionment of VOCs measured in an industrial area of Nanjing,
Yangtze River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 97, 206–214,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.021</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Barletta, B., Meinardi, S., Sherwood Rowland, F., Chan, C.-Y., Wang, X.,
Zou, S., Yin Chan, L., and Blake, D. R.: Volatile organic compounds in 43
Chinese cities, Atmos. Environ., 39, 5979–5990,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.06.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.06.029</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Borbon, A., Locoge, N., Veillerot, M., Galloo, J. C., and Guillermo, R.:
Characterisation of NMHCs in a French urban atmosphere: overview of the main
sources, Sci. Total Environ., 292, 177–191, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, W. P. L.: Development of Ozone Reactivity Scales for Volatile
Organic Compounds, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 44, 881–899,
1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, W. P. L.: Development of the SAPRC-07 Chemical Mechanism and Updated
Ozone Reactivity Scales, available at:
<a href="https://www.cert.ucr.edu/~carter/SAPRC" target="_blank">https://www.cert.ucr.edu/~carter/SAPRC</a> (last access: 13 March 2018), 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, W. T., Shao, M., Lu, S. H., Wang, M., Zeng, L. M., Yuan, B., and Liu, Y.: Understanding primary and secondary
sources of ambient carbonyl compounds in Beijing using the PMF model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3047–3062, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3047-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3047-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, L., Fu, L., Angle, R. P., and Sandhu, H. S.: Seasonal variations of
volatile organic compounds in Edmonton, Alberta, Atmos. Environ., 31,
239–246, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection: Ambient Air Quality Index
(AQI) Technical Provisions (Trial), available at:
<a href="http://kjs.mee.gov.cn/hjbhbz/bzwb/jcffbz/201203/t20120302_224166.shtml" target="_blank">http://kjs.mee.gov.cn/hjbhbz/bzwb/jcffbz/201203/t20120302_224166.shtml</a> (last access: 3 November 2018), 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Choek, D. P. and Heuss, J. M.: Urban ozone and its precursors, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 21, 1146–1153, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Duan, J., Tan, J., Yang, L., Wu, S., and Hao, J.: Concentration, sources and
ozone formation potential of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during ozone
episode in Beijing, Atmos. Res., 88, 25–35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.09.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.09.004</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Fujita, E. M.: Hydrocarbon source apportionment for the 1996 Paso del Norte
Ozone Study, Sci. Total Environ., 276, 171–184, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Fujita, E. M., Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., and Lu, Z.: Validation of the
chemical mass balance receptor model applied to hydrocarbon source
apportionment in the southern California air quality study, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 28, 1633–1649, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, W., Tie, X., Xu, J., Huang, R., Mao, X., Zhou, G., and Chang, L.:
Long-term trend of O<sub>3</sub> in a mega City (Shanghai), China:
Characteristics, causes, and interactions with precursors, Sci. Total
Environ., 603–604, 425–433, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.099" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.099</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Geng, N., Wang, J., Xu, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, C., and Zhang, R.: PM2.5 in an
industrial district of Zhengzhou, China: Chemical composition and source
apportionment, Particuology, 11, 99–109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2012.08.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2012.08.004</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gentner, D. R., Worton, D. R., Isaacman, G., Davis, L. C., Dallmann, T. R.,
Wood, E. C., Herndon, S. C., Goldstein, A. H., and Harley, R. A.: Chemical
composition of gas-phase organic carbon emissions from motor vehicles and
implications for ozone production, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11837–11848,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es401470e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es401470e</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Gilman, J. B., Lerner, B. M., Kuster, W. C., and de Gouw, J. A.: Source
signature of volatile organic compounds from oil and natural gas operations
in northeastern Colorado, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 1297–1305,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es304119a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es304119a</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Gong, M., Yin, S., Gu, X., Xu, Y., Jiang, N., and Zhang, R.: Refined
2013-based vehicle emission inventory and its spatial and temporal
characteristics in Zhengzhou, China, Sci. Total Environ., 599–600,
1149–1159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.299" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.299</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T.,
Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., McKay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B.,
Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmerman, P.: A global
model of natural volatile organic compound emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 100,
8873–8892, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A. B., Zimmerman, P. R., and Harley, P. C.: Isoprene and
monoterpene emission rate variability: model evaluations and sensitivity
analyses, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 12609–12617, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, H., Cheng, H. R., Ling, Z. H., Louie, P. K., and Ayoko, G. A.: Which
emission sources are responsible for the volatile organic compounds in the
atmosphere of Pearl River Delta?, J. Hazard. Mater., 188, 116–124,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.081</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, H., Ling, Z. H., Cheng, H. R., Simpson, I. J., Lyu, X. P., Wang, X. M.,
Shao, M., Lu, H. X., Ayoko, G., Zhang, Y. L., Saunders, S. M., Lam, S. H.
M., Wang, J. L., and Blake, D. R.: Tropospheric volatile organic compounds
in China, Sci. Total Environ., 574, 1021–1043,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.116</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, S., Tan, J., Duan, J., Ma, Y., Yang, F., He, K., and Hao, J.:
Characteristics of atmospheric non-methane hydrocarbons during haze episode
in Beijing, China, Environ. Monit. Assess., 184, 7235–7246,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2493-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2493-9</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Haagen-Smit, A. T.: Chemistry and physiology of Los Angeles smog, J. Ind.
Eng. Chem., 44, 1342–1346, 1952.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hanna, S. R., Moore, G. E., and Fernau, M.: Evaluation of photochemical grid
models (UAM-IV, UAM-V, and the ROM/UAM-IV couple) using data from the Lake
Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS), Atmos. Environ., 30, 3265–3279, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hidy, G. M. and Blanchard, C. L.: Precursor reductions and ground-level
ozone in the Continental United States, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.,
65, 1261–1282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1079564" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1079564</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Ho, K. F., Lee, S. C., Ho, W. K., Blake, D. R., Cheng, Y., Li, Y. S., Ho, S. S. H., Fung, K., Louie, P. K. K., and Park, D.:
Vehicular emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from a tunnel study in Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7491–7504,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7491-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7491-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hopke, P. K., Barrie, L. A., Li, S.-M., Cheng, M.-D.,  Li, C., and Xie, Y.:
Possible sources and preferred pathways for biogenic and non-sea-salt sulfur
for the high Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 16595–16603, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, Y., Ling, Z. H., Lee, S. C., Ho, S. S. H., Cao, J. J., Blake, D. R.,
Cheng, Y., Lai, S. C., Ho, K. F., Gao, Y., Cui, L., and Louie, P. K. K.:
Characterization of volatile organic compounds at a roadside environment in
Hong Kong: An investigation of influences after air pollution control
strategies, Atmos. Environ., 122, 809–818, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.036</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Jia, C., Mao, X., Huang, T., Liang, X., Wang, Y., Shen, Y., Jiang, W., Wang,
H., Bai, Z., Ma, M., Yu, Z., Ma, J., and Gao, H.: Non-methane hydrocarbons
(NMHCs) and their contribution to ozone formation potential in a
petrochemical industrialized city, Northwest China, Atmos. Res., 169,
225–236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.10.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.10.006</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jin, X. and Holloway, T.: Spatial and temporal variability of ozone
sensitivity over China observed from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7229–7246, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023250" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023250</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Jobson, B. T., Berkowitz, C. M., Kuster, W. C., Goldan, P. D., Williams, E.
J., Fesenfeld, F. C., Apel, E. C., Karl, T., Lonneman, W. A., and Riemer,
D.: Hydrocarbon source signatures in Houston, Texas: Influence of the
petrochemical industry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109,
D24305,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004887" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004887</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Lau, A. K., Yuan, Z., Yu, J. Z., and Louie, P. K.: Source apportionment of
ambient volatile organic compounds in Hong Kong, Sci. Total Environ., 408,
4138–4149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.025</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Li, B., Ho, S. S. H., Xue, Y., Huang, Y., Wang, L., Cheng, Y., Dai, W.,
Zhong, H., Cao, J., and Lee, S.: Characterizations of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) from vehicular emissions at roadside environment: The first
comprehensive study in Northwestern China, Atmos. Environ., 161, 1–12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.029</a>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Li, K., Chen, L., Ying, F., White, S. J., Jang, C., Wu, X., Gao, X., Hong,
S., Shen, J., Azzi, M., and Cen, K.: Meteorological and chemical impacts on
ozone formation: A case study in Hangzhou, China, Atmos. Res.,
196, 40–52, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.003</a>, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Li, L. and Wang, X.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of atmospheric
non-methane hydrocarbons in Guangzhou, China, Inter. J. Env. Res. Pub.
Heal., 9, 1859–1873, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9051859" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9051859</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Li, L., Chen, Y., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Xie, S., Chen, W., Lu, S., Wu, Y., and
Cao, W.: Biomass burning contribution to ambient volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) in the Chengdu–Chongqing Region (CCR), China, Atmos. Environ., 99,
403–410, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.067</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Q., Zhang, L., Wang, T., Wang, Z., Fu, X., and Zhang, Q.: “New” Reactive
Nitrogen Chemistry Reshapes the Relationship of Ozone to Its Precursors,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 2810–2818, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05771" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05771</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, X., Traner, M., and Liu, S. C.: On the Nonlinearity of the Tropospheric
Ozone Production, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 93, 15879–15888, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, B., Liang, D., Yang, J., Dai, Q., Bi, X., Feng, Y., Yuan, J., Xiao, Z.,
Zhang, Y., and Xu, H.: Characterization and source apportionment of volatile
organic compounds based on 1-year of observational data in Tianjin, China,
Environ. Pollut., 218, 757–769, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.072" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.072</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, H., Liu, S., Xue, B., Lv, Z., Meng, Z., Yang, X., Xue, T., Yu, Q., and
He, K.: Ground-level ozone pollution and its health impacts in China, Atmos.
Environ., 173, 223–230, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.014</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y., Shao, M., Fu, L., Lu, S., Zeng, L., and Tang, D.: Source profiles
of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured in China: Part I, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 6247–6260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.070" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.070</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y., Yuan, B., Li, X., Shao, M., Lu, S., Li, Y., Chang, C.-C., Wang, Z., Hu, W., Huang, X., He, L., Zeng, L., Hu, M.,
and Zhu, T.: Impact of pollution controls in Beijing on atmospheric oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) during
the 2008 Olympic Games: observation and modeling implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3045–3062, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3045-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3045-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Louie, P. K. K., Ho, J. W. K., Tsang, R. C. W., Blake, D. R., Lau, A. K. H.,
Yu, J. Z., Yuan, Z., Wang, X., Shao, M., and Zhong, L.: VOCs and OVOCs
distribution and control policy implications in Pearl River Delta region,
China, Atmos. Environ., 76, 125–135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.058</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Luecken, D. J., Napelenok, S. L., Strum, M., Scheffe, R., and Phillips, S.:
Sensitivity of Ambient Atmospheric Formaldehyde and Ozone to Precursor
Species and Source Types Across the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 4668–4675, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05509" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05509</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Lyu, X. P., Chen, N., Guo, H., Zhang, W. H., Wang, N., Wang, Y., and Liu,
M.: Ambient volatile organic compounds and their effect on ozone production
in Wuhan, central China, Sci. Total Environ., 541, 200–209,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.093</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Malley, C. S., Braban, C. F., Dumitrean, P., Cape, J. N., and Heal, M. R.: The impact of speciated VOCs on regional
ozone increment derived from measurements at the UK EMEP supersites between 1999 and 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8361–8380, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8361-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8361-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
McGaughey, G. R., Desai, N. R., Allen, D. T., Seila, R. L., Lonneman, W. A.,
Fraser, M. P., Harley, R. A., Pollack, A. K., Ivy, J. M., and Price, J. H.:
Analysis of motor vehicle emissions in a Houston tunnel during the Texas Air
Quality Study 2000, Atmos. Environ., 38, 3363–3372,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.006</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Na, K., Kim, Y. P., Moon, K.-C., Moon, I., and Fung, K.: Concentrations of
volatile organic compounds in an industrial area of Korea, Atmos. Environ.,
35, 2747–2756, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Nagashima, T., Sudo, K., Akimoto, H., Kurokawa, J., and Ohara, T.: Long-term change in the source contribution to surface
ozone over Japan, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8231–8246, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8231-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8231-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Oliver, K. D., Adams, J. R., Daughtrey Jr., E. H., Mcclenny, W. A., Yoong, M. J.,
and Pardee, M. A.: Technique for monitoring ozone precursor hydrocarbons in
air at photochemical assessment monitoring stations: sorbent
preconcentration, closed-cycle cooler cryofocusing, and GC-FID analysis,
Atmos. Environ., 30, 2751–2757, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Ou, J., Zheng, J., Li, R., Huang, X., Zhong, Z., Zhong, L., and Lin, H.:
Speciated OVOC and VOC emission inventories and their implications for
reactivity-based ozone control strategy in the Pearl River Delta region,
China, Sci. Total Environ., 530–531, 393–402,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.062</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Ou, J., Yuan, Z., Zheng, J., Huang, Z., Shao, M., Li, Z., Huang, X., Guo,
H., and Louie, P. K.: Ambient Ozone Control in a Photochemically Active
Region: Short-Term Despiking or Long-Term Attainment?, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 50, 5720–5728, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00345" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00345</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Polissar, A. V., Hopke, P. K., Paatero, P., Kaufmann, Y. J., Hall, D. K.,
Bodhaine, B. A., Dutton, E. G., and Harris, J. M.: The aerosol at Barrow,
Alaska: long-term trends and source locations, Atmos. Environ., 33,
2441–2458, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Pollack, I. B., Ryerson, T. B., Trainer, M., Neuman, J. A., Roberts, J. M.,
and Parrish, D. D.: Trends in ozone, its precursors, and related secondary
oxidation products in Los Angeles, California: A synthesis of measurements
from 1960 to 2010, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5893–5911,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50472" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50472</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Raysoni, A. U., Stock, T. H., Sarnat, J. A., Chavez, M. C., Sarnat, S. E.,
Montoya, T., Holguin, F., and Li, W. W.: Evaluation of VOC concentrations in
indoor and outdoor microenvironments at near-road schools, Environ. Pollut.,
231, 681–693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.065</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Russo, R. S., Zhou, Y., White, M. L., Mao, H., Talbot, R., and Sive, B. C.: Multi-year (2004–2008) record of
nonmethane hydrocarbons and halocarbons in New England: seasonal variations and regional sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4909–4929,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4909-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4909-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Shao, M., Lu, S., Liu, Y., Xie, X., Chang, C., Huang, S., and Chen, Z.:
Volatile organic compounds measured in summer in Beijing and their role in
ground-level ozone formation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114,
114, D00G06, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010863" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010863</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Shao, M., Wang, B., Lu, S., Yuan, B., and Wang, M.: Effects of Beijing
Olympics Control Measures on Reducing Reactive Hydrocarbon Species, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 45, 514–519, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Shao, P., An, J., Xin, J., Wu, F., Wang, J., Ji, D., and Wang, Y.: Source
apportionment of VOCs and the contribution to photochemical ozone formation
during summer in the typical industrial area in the Yangtze River Delta,
China, Atmos. Res., 176–177, 64–74, doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.015, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, F., Ge, X., Hu, J., Nie, D., Tian, L., and Chen, M.: Air pollution
characteristics and health risks in Henan Province, China, Environ. Res.,
156, 625–634, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.04.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.04.026</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Shiu, C.-J., Liu, S. C., Chang, C.-C., Chen, J.-P., Chou, C. C. K., Lin,
C.-Y., and Young, C.-Y.: Photochemical production of ozone and control
strategy for Southern Taiwan, Atmos. Environ., 41, 9324–9340,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.014</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Sillman, S.: The relation between ozone, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and hydrocarbons in urban and
polluted rural environments, Atmos. Environ., 33, 1821–1845, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Streets, D. G., Fu, J. S., Jang, C. J., Hao, J., He, K., Tang, X., Zhang,
Y., Wang, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Wang, B., and Yu, C.: Air quality
during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, Atmos. Environ., 41, 480–492,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.046</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, J., Wu, F., Hu, B., Tang, G., Zhang, J., and Wang, Y.: VOC
characteristics, emissions and contributions to SOA formation during hazy
episodes, Atmos. Environ., 141, 560–570, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.060</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, J. H., Chan, L. Y., Chan, C. Y., Li, Y. S., Chang, C. C., Liu, S. C.,
Wu, D., and Li, Y. D.: Characteristics and diurnal variations of NMHCs at
urban, suburban, and rural sites in the Pearl River Delta and a remote site
in South China, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8620–8632,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.029</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Tsai, S. M., Zhang, J. J., Smith, K. R., Ma, Y., Rasmussen, R. A., and
Khalil, M. A. K.: Characterization of Non-methane Hydrocarbons Emitted from
Various Cookstoves Used in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 2869–2877,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
US EPA: Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS), available at:
<a href="https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/pamsmain.html" target="_blank">https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/pamsmain.html</a> (last access: 3 December
2018), 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
US EPA: Compendium Method TO-15: Determination of volatile organic compounds
in air collected in specially prepared canisters and analyzed by gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
US EPA: National air pollutant emission trends 1900–1998, Off. Air Qual.
Plann. Stand., Research Triangle Park, N. C, Rep. EPA 454/R-00-002, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H., Qiao, Y., Chen, C., Lu, J., Qiao, L., and Lou, S.: Source Profiles
and Chemical Reactivity of Volatile Organic Compounds from Solvent Use in
Shanghai, China, Aerosol Air Qual. Res.,
14, 301–310,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.03.0064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.03.0064</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H.-L., Jing, S.-A., Lou, S.-R., Hu, Q.-Y., Li, L., Tao, S.-K., Huang,
C., Qiao, L.-P., and Chen, C.-H.: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) source
profiles of on-road vehicle emissions in China, Sci. Total Environ.,
607–608, 253–261, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.001</a>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, M., Shao, M., Lu, S.-H., Yang, Y.-D., and Chen, W.-T.: Evidence of
coal combustion contribution to ambient VOCs during winter in Beijing, Chin.
Chem. Lett., 24, 829–832, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2013.05.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2013.05.029</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, M., Shao, M., Chen, W., Lu, S., Liu, Y., Yuan, B., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Q., Chang, C.-C., Wang, B., Zeng, L., Hu, M.,
Yang, Y., and Li, Y.: Trends of non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) emissions in Beijing during 2002–2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
1489–1502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1489-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1489-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Q., Li, S., Dong, M., Li, W., Gao, X., Ye, R., and Zhang, D.: VOCs
emission characteristics and priority control analysis based on VOCs
emission inventories and ozone formation potentials in Zhoushan, Atmos.
Environ., 182, 234–241, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, T., Xue, L., Brimblecombe, P., Lam, Y. F., Li, L., and Zhang, L.:
Ozone pollution in China: A review of concentrations, meteorological
influences, chemical precursors, and effects, Sci. Total Environ., 575,
1582–1596, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.081</a>, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X.-M., Sheng, G.-Y., Fu, J.-M., Chan, C.-Y., Lee, S.-C., Chan, L. Y.,
and Wang, Z.-S.: Urban roadside aromatic hydrocarbons in three cities of the
Pearl River Delta, People's Republic of China, Atmos. Environ., 36,
5141–5148, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, W., Cheng, S., Li, G., Wang, G., and Wang, H.: Characteristics of ozone
and ozone precursors (VOCs and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>) around a petroleum refinery in Beijing,
China, J. Environ. Sci.-China, 26, 332–342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-0742(13)60412-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-0742(13)60412-x</a>,
2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, R. and Xie, S.: Spatial Distribution of Ozone Formation in China
Derived from Emissions of Speciated Volatile Organic Compounds, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 2574–2583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03634" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03634</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Xue, Y., Ho, S. S. H., Huang, Y., Li, B., Wang, L., Dai, W., Cao, J., and
Lee, S.: Source apportionment of VOCs and their impacts on surface ozone in
an industry city of Baoji, Northwestern China, Sci. Rep., 7, 9979,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10631-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10631-4</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, Y., Peng, L., Li, R., Li, Y., Li, L., and Bai, H.: Concentration, ozone
formation potential and source analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
in a thermal power station centralized area: A study in Shuozhou, China,
Environ. Pollut., 223, 295–304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.026</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, B., Shao, M., de Gouw, J., Parrish, D. D., Lu, S., Wang, M., Zeng, L.,
Zhang, Q., Song, Y., Zhang, J., and Hu, M.: Volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) in urban air: How chemistry affects the interpretation of positive
matrix factorization (PMF) analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117,
117, D24302,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018236" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018236</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Lu, S., Huang, Z., Huang, X., and Wang, Y.:
Ambient air benzene at background sites in China's most developed coastal
regions: exposure levels, source implications and health risks, Sci. Total
Environ., 511, 792–800, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.003</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Y., Yang, L., Chen, J., Wang, X., Xue, L., Sui, X., Wen, L., Xu, C.,
Yao, L., Zhang, J., Shao, M., Lu, S., and Wang, W.: Characteristics of
ambient volatile organic compounds and the influence f biomass burning at a
rural site in Northern China during summer 2013, Atmos. Environ., 124,
156–165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.097" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.097</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
