Aircraft-based measurements of High Arctic springtime aerosol show evidence for vertically varying sources , transport and composition

The sources, chemical transformations and removal mechanisms of aerosol transported to the Arctic are key factors that control Arctic aerosol–climate interactions. Our understanding of sources and processes is limited by a lack of vertically resolved observations in remote Arctic regions. We present vertically resolved observations of trace gases and aerosol composition in High Arctic springtime, made largely north of 80 N, during the NETCARE campaign. Trace gas gradients observed on these flights defined the polar dome as north of 66–68 30 N and below potential temperatures of 283.5–287.5 K. In the polar dome, we observe evidence for vertically varying source regions and chemical processing. These vertical changes in sources and chemistry lead to systematic variation in aerosol composition as a function of potential temperature. We show evidence for sources of aerosol with higher organic aerosol (OA), ammonium and refractory black carbon (rBC) content in the upper polar dome. Based on FLEXPART-ECMWF calculations, air masses sampled at all levels inside the polar dome (i.e., potential temperature < 280.5 K, altitude <∼ 3.5 km) subsided during transport over transport times of at least 10 days. Air masses at the lowest potential temperatures, in the lower polar dome, had spent long periods (> 10 days) in the Arctic, while air masses in the upper polar dome had entered the Arctic more recently. Variations in aerosol composition were closely related to transport history. In the lower polar dome, the measured sub-micron aerosol mass was dominated by sulfate (mean 74 %), with lower contributions from rBC (1 %), ammonium (4 %) and OA (20 %). At higher altitudes and higher potential temperatures, OA, ammonium and rBC contributed 42 %, 8 % and 2 % of aerosol mass, respectively. A qualitative indication for the presence of sea salt showed that sodium chloride contributed to sub-micron aerosol in the lower polar dome, but was not detectable in the upper polar dome. Our observations highlight the differences in Arctic aerosol chemistry observed at surface-based sites and the aerosol transported throughout the depth of the Arctic troposphere in spring. Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 58 M. D. Willis et al.: Spring Arctic aerosol


Introduction
Arctic regions are warming faster than the global average, with significant impacts on local ecosystems and local people (e.g, Bindoff et al., 2013;Hinzman et al., 2013).While Arctic warming is driven largely by increasing concentrations of anthropogenic greenhouse gases and local feedback mechanisms, short-lived climate forcing agents also impact Arctic climate.In particular, short-lived species such as aerosol, tropospheric ozone and methane are important climate forcers (e.g., Law and Stohl, 2007;Quinn et al., 2008).The impact of pollution aerosol, transported northward over long distances, on Arctic climate has been significant.For example, a large fraction of greenhouse-gas-induced warming (∼ 60 %) has been offset by anthropogenic aerosol over the past century, such that reductions in sulfur emissions in Europe since 1980 can explain a large amount of Arctic warming since that time (∼ 0.5 K) (Fyfe et al., 2013;Najafi et al., 2015;Navarro et al., 2016).These estimates are compelling, and at the same time global models that form the basis of our predictive capability often struggle to reproduce key characteristics of Arctic aerosol, such as the seasonal cycle and vertical distribution (Shindell et al., 2008;Emmons et al., 2015;Monks et al., 2015;Eckhardt et al., 2015;Arnold et al., 2016).Our incomplete understanding of Arctic aerosol processes results in diverse and frequently poor model skill in simulating Arctic aerosol both at the surface and through the troposphere, and therefore also in accurately simulating aerosol-climate interactions (Arnold et al., 2016).This challenge arises in part due to a lack of vertically resolved observations in Arctic regions.
Particle composition drives aerosol optical properties (e.g., Boucher and Anderson, 1995;Jacobson, 2001;Wang et al., 2008), ice nucleation efficiency (e.g., Abbatt et al., 2006;Hoose and Möhler, 2012), and heterogeneous chemistry that impacts both gas and particle composition (e.g., Fan and Jacob, 1992;Mao et al., 2010;Abbatt et al., 2012).The vertical distribution of aerosol and its chemical and physical properties can impact Arctic regional climate in a number of ways.First, absorption of incoming solar radiation by aerosol (e.g., black carbon) can lead to warming in the lower troposphere when present near the surface.In contrast, absorbing aerosol present at higher altitudes causes cooling at the surface and impacts atmospheric stratification (Rinke et al., 2004;Ritter et al., 2005;Treffeisen et al., 2005;Shindell and Faluvegi, 2009;Engvall et al., 2009).Further, the location in the troposphere impacts deposition to high albedo surfaces, depending on the mechanism of removal (e.g., Macdonald et al., 2017).Absorbing aerosol deposited to the surface has a strong impact on the albedo of ice and snow, efficiently leading to warming (Clarke and Noone, 1985;Hansen and Nazarenko, 2004;Flanner et al., 2009;Flanner, 2013).Second, neutralization of acidic sulfate impacts aerosol water content and aerosol phase, with implications for the magnitude of aerosol-radiation interactions (Boucher and Anderson, 1995;Wang et al., 2008).Third, sulfuric acid coatings on particles can decrease their ability to act as ice-nucleating particles (INPs), leading to larger, more readily precipitating ice crystals (Blanchet andGirard, 1994, 1995).This process can lead to enhanced atmospheric dehydration, leading to diminished long-wave forcing (Curry and Herman, 1985;Blanchet andGirard, 1994, 1995).Further, particles containing mineral dust, organic species, sea salt or neutralized sulfate can act as ice nuclei and increase ice crystal number, also leading to impacts on long-wave and short-wave cloud forcing (Sassen et al., 2003;Abbatt et al., 2006;Baustian et al., 2010;Wagner et al., 2018).Finally, Arctic pollution aerosol can impact the micro-physical properties of liquidcontaining clouds, by increasing liquid water path and decreasing droplet radius.Such micro-physical changes can result in enhanced long-wave warming effects during winter and spring (Garrett and Zhao, 2006;Lubin and Vogelmann, 2006;Zhao and Garrett, 2015).
Observations at Arctic ground-based monitoring stations form the basis of our current knowledge about Arctic aerosol seasonality, chemical composition and sources.These longterm observations have demonstrated a pronounced seasonal cycle in Arctic aerosol mass concentrations, particle size distribution and composition, driven by seasonal variations in northward long-range transport and aerosol wet removal (e.g., Quinn et al., 2007;Sharma et al., 2013;Tunved et al., 2013;Croft et al., 2016;Asmi et al., 2016;Nguyen et al., 2016;Freud et al., 2017;Leaitch et al., 2018).Aerosol mass concentrations peak in winter to early spring when longrange-transported accumulation mode particles (200-400 nm mode diameter), referred to broadly as "Arctic haze", dominate the particle size distribution (e.g., Croft et al., 2016;Freud et al., 2017).A mixture of natural and anthropogenic aerosol is transported to Arctic regions by near-isentropic transport along surfaces of constant potential temperature that slope upwards toward the Arctic (Klonecki et al., 2003;Stohl, 2006).The sloping isentropic surfaces form a closed "dome" over the polar region; this polar dome is zonally asymmetric, extends further south in winter and contracts northward in spring to summer (Shaw, 1995;Law and Stohl, 2007;Stohl, 2006;Law et al., 2014).
Arctic haze observed near the surface is largely acidic sulfate, with fewer contributions from organic aerosol (OA), dust, nitrate, ammonium and sea salt (Li and Winchester, 1989;Quinn et al., 2002Quinn et al., , 2007;;Shaw et al., 2010;Leaitch et al., 2018).Aerosol acidity increases during winter and reaches a peak in late spring (Sirois and Barrie, 1999;Toom-Sauntry and Barrie, 2002), before the return of wet removal brings the Arctic toward near-pristine conditions with more neutralized aerosol (Engvall et al., 2008;Browse et al., 2012;Breider et al., 2014;Wentworth et al., 2016;Croft et al., 2016).Sea salt is thought to be an important contributor to Arctic haze in winter to early spring owing to stronger wind speeds over nearby oceans, potential wind-driven sources in ice and snow-covered regions, and open leads (Leck et al., 2002;Shaw et al., 2010;May et al., 2016;Huang and Jaeglé, 2017;Kirpes et al., 2018).The major source region of nearsurface Arctic haze in winter and early spring is northern Europe and northern Asia/Siberia, but the magnitudes of sources in this region have been decreasing in recent decades (Barrie and Hoff, 1984;Sharma et al., 2004;Koch and Hansen, 2005;Sharma et al., 2006;Hirdman et al., 2010;Huang et al., 2010b;Gong et al., 2010;Bourgeois and Bey, 2011;Stohl et al., 2013;Sharma et al., 2013;Monks et al., 2015;Qi et al., 2017).Surface-based observations have provided substantial insight into Arctic aerosol processes, but owing to the stability of the troposphere the surface can be decoupled from the atmosphere above.Therefore, surfacebased observations may not represent the overall composition of aerosol transported to the Arctic troposphere (e.g., Stohl, 2006;McNaughton et al., 2011).How transported aerosol present throughout the troposphere is related to Arctic haze observed near the surface remains an unresolved question (Law et al., 2014;Arnold et al., 2016).
Vertically resolved observations of the Arctic atmosphere, in the last 20 years, have furthered our understanding of the properties, processes, and impacts of Arctic aerosol.Some of the only seasonal airborne observations of aerosol sulfate suggested that the aerosol seasonal cycle may differ aloft compared to near the surface (Klonecki et al., 2003;Scheuer et al., 2003).Clean-out may begin to take place near the surface in late April to May, before significant changes occur aloft.Intensive observations were made during the International Polar Year (IPY) in 2007-2008.During IPY, high concentrations of aerosol and trace gases from biomass and fossil fuel burning were observed in discrete layers that did not appear related to Arctic haze observed near the surface (e.g., Warneke et al., 2009;Schmale et al., 2011;Brock et al., 2011;Law et al., 2014).Also during IPY, aerosol ammonium content increased from near the surface toward the middle to upper troposphere (Fisher et al., 2011).The largest fraction of sulfate was observed in the lower ∼ 2 km, in general agreement with long-term monitoring observations.In years with high burned area in the Northern Hemisphere, such as 2008, biomass burning sources contribute a significant fraction of black carbon and organic aerosol in the Arctic troposphere (Warneke et al., 2009;Hecobian et al., 2011;McNaughton et al., 2011;Bian et al., 2013).In years with moderate burned area consistent with decadal mean conditions, anthropogenic sources can still lead to enhanced absorbing aerosol in the Arctic mid-troposphere (Liu et al., 2015).IPY observations in the Alaskan Arctic demonstrated that background pollution aerosol (i.e., in air masses with CO < 170 ppb v ) and aerosol in the near-surface layer (i.e., in air masses with depleted O 3 ) contained a larger fraction of sulfate compared to aerosol attributed to biomass or fossil fuel burning (Brock et al., 2011).The properties of Arctic background air masses were generally consistent with median observations at a nearby ground station, Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska (Brock et al., 2011).This background aerosol often has diffuse source regions that are difficult to diagnose precisely using 10-day backward trajectories (e.g, Brock et al., 2011;Qi et al., 2017;Leaitch et al., 2018).
Our knowledge of the vertical distribution of Arctic aerosol source regions has also been extended by recent airborne observations.Results from modelling efforts generally agree that Arctic pollution aerosol is a result of a combination of anthropogenic and natural sources from mid-latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere; particularly a combination of European, north and south Asian, and North American source regions (e.g., Law et al., 2014;Arnold et al., 2016).However, modelling efforts provide less quantitative agreement on the magnitude of the contributions of each region near the surface and as a function of altitude.Our emerging understanding is of northern Eurasian sources dominating near the surface in winter, while North America and southern and eastern Asia can be important in the middle to upper troposphere (e.g., Koch and Hansen, 2005;Shindell et al., 2008;Huang et al., 2010a;Law et al., 2014;Liu et al., 2015;Arnold et al., 2016;Qi et al., 2017).In spring, as the polar dome recedes northward, North American and Asian sources become more important at all altitudes (Koch and Hansen, 2005;Fisher et al., 2011;Xu et al., 2017).Overall, more southerly source regions become more important at higher altitudes (e.g., Stohl, 2006;Fisher et al., 2011;Harrigan et al., 2011), and the importance of Asian sources above the Arctic surface is being increasingly recognized (e.g., Koch and Hansen, 2005;Fisher et al., 2011;Xu et al., 2017).The magnitude of Asian influence on the lower troposphere inferred from models in spring varies significantly and depends on emissions estimates and assumptions about aerosol removal efficiency during transport (e.g., Matsui et al., 2011a, b).Source apportionment of recent vertically resolved Arctic black carbon observations demonstrated that eastern and southern Asia make important contributions throughout the troposphere in spring, with a more significant contribution at higher altitudes (Xu et al., 2017).Northern Asia was a more important source region near the surface (Xu et al., 2017).Changes in source strengths at mid-latitudes and within the Arctic strongly impact the dominant source regions for different aerosol species (Arnold et al., 2016).
Previous vertically resolved observations of Arctic pollution aerosol frequently focused on episodic events of high pollutant concentrations, largely owing to their potential radiative impact (e.g., Rahn et al., 1977;Engvall et al., 2009;Warneke et al., 2009;Law et al., 2014).We know less about the vertical distribution of Arctic aerosol properties within the High Arctic polar dome and under conditions consistent with Arctic background conditions (e.g., CO < 170 ppb v ; Brock et al., 2011).Improved understanding of different anthropogenic and natural contributions to Arctic aerosol will provide a scientific basis for sustainable climate mitigation and adaptation strategies.Within the framework of the NET-CARE project, airborne observations of Arctic haze aerosol were made across the North American and European Arctic in April 2015.Observations of trace gas gradients dur-ing this campaign were used by Bozem et al. (2018) to define the boundaries of the polar dome.The location of the maximum trace gas gradient defined the polar dome as north of 66-68 • 30 N and below potential temperatures of 283.5-287.5 K. Based on Bozem et al. (2018) we use a conservative definition of the polar dome area based on the interquartile range of the location of maximum trace gas gradient: north of 69 • 30 N and below 280.5 K.In this work, we quantify vertical changes in sub-micron aerosol composition in the Canadian High Arctic within the boundaries of the polar dome and in the absence of episodic transport events of high pollutant concentrations.Using the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART, we explore the source regions that drive observed sub-micron aerosol in the springtime polar dome.Finally, we examine the depth over which aerosol consistent with surface monitoring observations extends vertically in the polar dome, and assess the representativeness of groundbased observations for aerosol transported to the polar dome in spring.

Measurement platform and inlets
Measurements of aerosol, trace gases and meteorological parameters were made in High Arctic spring aboard the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) Polar 6 aircraft, an unpressurized DC-3 aircraft converted to a Basler BT-67 (Herber et al., 2008), as part of the Network on Climate and Aerosols: Addressing Key Uncertainties in Remote Canadian Environments project (NETCARE, http://www.netcare-project.ca, last access: 20 December 2018), and in partnership with the Polar Airborne Measurements and Arctic Regional Climate Model Simulation Project (PAMARCMiP; Herber et al., 2012).Measurements on a total of 10 flights took place from 4 to 22 April 2015, based at four stations along the PAMARCMiP track: Longyearbyen, Svalbard (78.2 • N, 15.6 • E); Alert, Nunavut, Canada (82.5 • N, 62.3 • W); Eureka, Nunavut, Canada (80.0 • N, 85.9 • W); and Inuvik, Northwest Territories, Canada (68.4 • N, 133.7 • W).To focus our analysis on aerosol within the polar dome, a subset of six flights in the High Arctic during 7-13 April 2015 are considered in this analysis (Fig. 1).The vertical extent of these flights is shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement.During measurement flights aircraft speed was maintained at ∼ 75 m s −1 (∼ 270 km h −1 ), with ascent and descent rates of ∼ 150 m min −1 .
Aerosol and trace gas inlets were identical to those used aboard Polar 6 during the NETCARE 2014 summer campaign and are described in Leaitch et al. (2016) and Willis et al. (2016).Briefly, aerosol was sampled approximately isokinetically through a stainless steel shrouded diffuser in- let, with near-unity transmission of particles 20 nm to ∼ 1 µm in diameter at typical survey airspeeds and a total flow rate of approximately 55 L min −1 .Bypass lines off the main inlet, at angles of 45 • , carried aerosol to various instruments.Performance of the aerosol inlet used here was characterized by Leaitch et al. (2016).Aerosol was not actively dried prior to sampling; however, the temperature in the inlet line within the aircraft cabin was at least 15 • C warmer than the ambient temperature so that the relative humidity (RH) decreased significantly.

State parameters
State parameters and meteorological conditions were measured with an AIMMS-20, manufactured by Aventech Research Inc. (Barrie, ON, Canada; https://aventech.com/products/aimms20.html,last access: 20 December 2018).The AIMMS-20 consists of three modules: (1) an Air Data Probe, which measures temperature and the threedimensional aircraft-relative flow vector (total air speed TAS, angle of attack, and side slip) with a three-dimensional accelerometer for measurement of turbulence; (2) an Inertial Measurement Unit, which provides the aircraft angular rate and acceleration; and (3) a Global Positioning System for aircraft three-dimensional position and inertial velocity.Vertical and horizontal wind speeds are measured with accuracies of 0.75 and 0.50 m s −1 respectively.Accuracy and precision of the temperature measurement are 0.30 and 0.10 • C respectively.Potential temperature was calculated using temperature and pressure measured by the AIMMS-20.

Trace gases
Carbon monoxide.CO concentrations were measured at 1 Hz with an Aerolaser ultra-fast carbon monoxide monitor (model AL 5002), based on VUV fluorimetry using excitation of CO at 150 nm.The instrument was modified such that in situ calibrations could be conducted in flight.Measured concentrations were significantly higher than the instrument detection limit.The measurement precision is ±1.5 ppb v , with an instrument stability based on in-flight calibrations of 1.7 %.
Water vapour and carbon dioxide.H 2 O and CO 2 measurements were made at 1 Hz using non-dispersive infrared absorption with a LI-7200 enclosed CO 2 /H 2 O analyzer from LI-COR Biosciences.In situ calibrations were performed during flight at regular intervals (15-30 min) using a NIST traceable CO 2 standard with zero water vapour concentration.Measured concentrations were significantly higher than the instrument detection limit.The measurement precision for CO 2 is ±0.05 ppm v , with an instrument stability based on in-flight calibrations of 0.5 %.The measurement precision for H 2 O is ±18.5 ppm v , with an instrument stability based on in-flight calibrations of 2.5 %.
Ozone.O 3 concentrations were measured, with a time resolution of 10 s, using UV absorption at 254 nm with a Thermo Scientific ozone analyzer (model 49i).The measurement uncertainty is ±0.2 ppb v .

Particle concentrations
Aerosol number size distributions from 100 nm to 1 µ m were acquired with two instruments: (1) a Droplet Measurement Technology (DMT) Ultra-High Sensitivity Aerosol Spectrometer (UHSAS) with a flow rate of 55 cm 3 min −1 from a bypass flow off the main aerosol inlet, and (2) a GRIMM sky optical particle counter (Sky-OPC, model 1.129) with a flow rate of 1200 cm 3 min −1 from a bypass flow off the main aerosol inlet (Cai et al., 2008).In their overlapping size range, comparison of UHSAS and OPC particle number concentrations suggested that the UHSAS underestimated the concentration of larger particles (> 500 nm).This comparison is presented in Fig. S2 and discussed further in Supplement Sect.S1.We therefore present these observations as the number of particles between 100 and 500 nm (N 100-500 ) derived from UHSAS observations and the number greater than 500 nm (N >500 ) from the OPC.Recent work has highlighted the impact of rapid pressure changes, during aircraft ascent and descent, on reported UHSAS particle concentra-tions (Brock et al., 2011;Kupc et al., 2018).However, comparison between particle measurements during NETCARE 2015 suggests that these effects are not significant, likely owing to the relatively slow vertical speed of the Polar 6 (Schulz et al., 2018).Owing to these instrumental discrepancies present at low particle number concentrations, we emphasize that absolute particle number concentrations should be treated with caution.

Particle composition
Refractory black carbon.Concentrations of particles containing refractory black carbon (rBC) were measured with a DMT single-particle soot photometer (SP2) (Schwarz et al., 2006;Gao et al., 2007).The SP2 uses a continuous intracavity Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) to classify particles as either incandescent (rBC) or scattering (non-rBC), based on the individual particle's interaction with the laser beam.The peak incandescence signal is linearly related to the rBC mass.The SP2 was calibrated with Fullerene Soot (Alfa Aesar) standard by selecting a narrow size distribution of particles with a differential mobility analyzer upstream of the SP2 (Laborde et al., 2012).The SP2 efficiently detected particles with rBC mass of 0.6 to 328.8 fg, which corresponds to 85-704 nm mass equivalent diameter (assuming a void free bulk material density of 1.8 g cm −3 ).rBC mass concentrations were not corrected for particles outside the instrument size range, and the measurement uncertainty is ±15 % (Laborde et al., 2012).Measurements of rBC during NETCARE 2015 are discussed in detail by Schulz et al. (2018).
Non-refractory aerosol composition.Non-refractory aerosol composition was measured with an Aerodyne timeof-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (ToF-MS) (DeCarlo et al., 2006).Operation of the ToF-AMS aboard Polar 6 and characterization of the pressure-controlled inlet system is described in Willis et al. (2016Willis et al. ( , 2017)).The ToF-AMS deployed here was equipped with an infrared laser vaporization module similar to that of the DMT SP2 (SP laser) (Onasch et al., 2012); however, rBC concentrations during the flights discussed here were generally below ToF-AMS detection limits (∼ 0.1 µg m −3 for rBC) so SP2 measurements of rBC are used in this work.The instrument was operated up to an altitude of ∼ 3.5 km, and the temperature of the ToF-AMS was passively maintained using a modular foil-lined insulating cover.The ToF-AMS was operated in "V-mode" with a mass range of m/z 3-290, alternating between ensemble mass spectrum (MS) mode for 10 s (two cycles of 5 s MS open and 5 s MS closed) with the SP laser on, MS mode with the SP laser off for 10 s, and efficient particle time-of-flight (epToF) mode with the SP laser on for 10 s (Supplement Table S1) (DeCarlo et al., 2006;Onasch et al., 2012).Single-particle observations were made on two flights; this ToF-AMS operation mode is described below.Only observations made with the SP laser off are used to quantify non-refractory aerosol composition.Filtered ambient air was sampled with the ToF-AMS at least 3 times per flight, for a duration of at least 5 min, to account for contributions from air signals.
Species comprising non-refractory particulate matter are quantified by the ToF-AMS, including sulfate (SO4), nitrate (NO3), ammonium (NH4), and the sum of organic species (OA).The ToF-AMS is also capable of detecting sea salt (Ovadnevaite et al., 2012).The detection efficiency of sea-salt-containing particles is dependent on not only the ambient RH but also the temperature of the tungsten vaporizer (Ovadnevaite et al., 2012).A quantitative estimate of sea salt mass is not possible with these measurements and this species is not included in the calculation of aerosol chemical mass fractions, such that the mass fractions presented represent non-refractory aerosol species and rBC measured by the SP2.The vaporizer temperature was calibrated with sodium nitrate particles and was operated at a temperature of ∼ 650 • C. ToF-AMS signals for sea salt, in particular NaCl + (m/z 57.96), can be used to quantify sea salt (Ovadnevaite et al., 2012); however, here we use the NaCl + signal only as a qualitative indication for the presence of sea salt owing to uncertainties in sea salt collection efficiency as a function of RH and the lack of RH measurement in the sampling line.Ammonium nitrate calibrations (Jimenez et al., 2003) were carried out twice during the campaign as well as before and after, owing to restricted access to calibration instruments during the campaign.Air-beam corrections were referenced to the appropriate calibration in order to account for differences in instrument sensitivity between flights.The relative ionization efficiencies for sulfate and ammonium (RIE SO 4 and RIE NH 4 ) were 0.9 ± 0.1 and 3.4 ± 0.3.The default relative ionization efficiency for organic species (i.e., RIE Org = 1.4) was used, which is appropriate for oxygenated organic aerosol (Jimenez et al., 2003(Jimenez et al., , 2016)).Elemental composition was calculated using the method presented in Canagaratna et al. (2015).Data were analyzed using the Igor Pro-based analysis tool PIKA (v.1.16H)and SQUIRREL (v.1.57l)(DeCarlo et al., 2006;Sueper, 2010).Detection limits and propagated uncertainties (i.e., ±(detection limit + total uncertainty)) for sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and organics at a 10 s time resolution were ±(0.009 µg m −3 + 35 %), ±(0.001 µg m −3 + 33 %), ±(0.003 µg m −3 + 33 %), and ±(0.08 µg m −3 + 37 %), respectively.We note that ion ratios commonly reported from ToF-AMS measurements of ammonium and sulfate are not appropriate for estimating aerosol neutralization (Hennigan et al., 2015), so we do not report these here.A composition-dependent collection efficiency (CDCE) was applied to correct ToF-AMS mass loadings for non-unity particle detection due to particle bounce on the tungsten vaporizer (Middlebrook et al., 2012), which resulted in a median (quartile range) collection efficiency correction of 18 % (12 %-28 %) applied uniformly to non-refractory aerosol species.
ToF-AMS total non-refractory aerosol mass correlated well with estimated aerosol mass from the UHSAS and OPC, but was generally higher by approximately a factor of 2 (Fig. S4, assuming a mean density of 1.5 g cm −3 ).An important exception to this observation occurred when the ToF-AMS measured significant NaCl + ; at these times, the ToF-AMS total aerosol mass was relatively constant while the estimated mass increased, indicating that sea salt was an important contributor to aerosol mass.These discrepancies are discussed further in Sect.S1 of the Supplement.Owing to the discrepancies between measured and estimated particle mass, we emphasize that absolute mass concentrations presented in this work should be treated with caution; however, these discrepancies do not prevent a useful interpretation of the ToF-AMS data based upon relative changes in particle composition.
ToF-AMS single-particle measurements.The ToF-AMS was operated in Event Trigger Single Particle (ETSP) mode on two flights (Table S1).ETSP is run in the single-slit particle-time-of-flight (pToF) mode.A particle event is defined as a single mass spectrum (MS) extraction or set of consecutive MS extractions associated with a single particle being vaporized and producing MS signals.The number of MS extractions obtained during a particle event is determined by the pulser frequency, and thus the mass range, set during acquisition; in this case 30.9 kHz, corresponding to a pulser period of 32.4 µs (m/z 3-290).Under these conditions, at least a single mass spectrum is collected per particle event.Saving mass spectra associated with a particle event is triggered in real time based on the signals present in up to three continuous ranges of mass-to-charge ratios, called regions of interest (ROIs).Three ROIs were used in this work such that a signal above a specified ion threshold in any ROI would trigger saving a mass spectrum (Table S2).Ion thresholds were purposely set low to collect a large number of false positives that are subsequently removed based on the relationship between total aerosol ion signal (i.e., excluding air) and particle size (Fig. S5), similar to the approach described in Lee et al. (2015).Two background regions in the particle size distribution (10-50 and 2000-4000 nm) were selected to determine the average background ion signal excluding air peaks, and particle events considered "real" must be between 80 and 1000 nm with ion signals above the mean background plus 3 times its standard deviation (Fig. S5).A simplified fragmentation table, described in Lee et al. (2015), was applied to particle mass spectra identified as "real" and fragmentation corrections were based on higher mass resolution ensemble MS spectra collected concurrently.A total of 1677 "real" particle spectra were collected over two flights (8 and 13 April 2015).A k-means cluster analysis was applied to particle spectra to explore different particle mixing states, following Lee et al. (2015).A two-cluster solution was selected to describe the 1677 total "real" particle spectra.Owing to the small number of particle spectra and the lack of specificity in organic aerosol peaks from highly oxygenated aerosol, increasing the number of clusters did not yield physically meaningful information.Mean mass spectra and mass spectral histograms for each particle class are shown in Fig. S6.ETSP data were analyzed using the Igor Pro-based analysis tools Tofware version 2.5.3.b (developed by TOFWERK and Aerodyne Research, Inc.), clustering input preparation panel (CIPP) version ETv2.1b and cluster analysis panel (CAP) version ETv2.1 (developed by Alex K. Y. Lee and Megan D. Willis).

Air mass history from particle dispersion modelling
The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXible PARTicle (FLEXPART) (Brioude et al., 2013) driven by meteorological analysis data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) was used to study the history of air masses prior to sampling during NETCARE flights.The ECMWF data had a horizontal grid spacing of 0.25 • and 137 vertical levels.Here, we use FLEXPART-ECMWF run in backward mode to study the origin of air influencing aircraft-based aerosol and trace gas measurements.Individual FLEXPART parcels were initialized along the flight track every 3 min and then traced back in time for 10 days, providing time-resolved information on source regions of trace species measured along the flight track.FLEXPART-ECMWF output was provided every 3 h over the 10-day period, with horizontal grid spacing of 0.25 • and 10 vertical levels (50,100,200,500,1000,2000,4000,6000, 8000 and 10 000 m).In backward mode, the model provides an emission sensitivity function called the potential emission sensitivity (PES).The PES in a particular grid cell, or air volume, is the response function of a source-receptor relationship, and is proportional to the particle residence time in that grid cell (e.g., Hirdman et al., 2010).PES values can be combined with emission distributions to calculate receptor concentrations, assuming the species is inert; however, we use the PES directly and show maps of PES with units of seconds (i.e., proportional to air mass residence time).Absolute residence times depend on the model output time step and the extent of spatial averaging.Maps of PES represent integration of model output over a period of time prior to sampling (i.e., 10 days), also referred to as the "time before measurement", and over a vertical range.We show maps of both the total column PES (i.e., 0-20 km) and partial column PES (i.e., 0-200 m), as emissions near the surface are of particular interest.
By integrating model output at each model release over specific pressure levels and/or latitude ranges we used FLEXPART-ECMWF to calculate the residence time of air in the middle-to-lower polar dome.The horizontal extent of the polar dome was defined based on Bozem et al. (2018) as north of 69 • 30 N. The vertical extent of the middle-tolower polar dome was defined based on trace gas profiles as below 265 K (∼ 1550 m).Calculation of this quantity is analogous to calculating the PES (i.e., by integrating in time and space), with constraints on altitude and location.This residence time is reported as a relative residence time over the 10-day FLEXPART-ECMWF backward integration time.Aircraft observations were sub-sampled to the model time resolution by taking a 1 min average of measurements around the model release time, when the aircraft altitude was within ±100 m of the model release altitude.

Transport regimes in the polar dome
We focus on observations made on six flights in the High Arctic during NETCARE 2015 over the period 7-13 April 2015.Figure 1 illustrates flight tracks during this period on a map of the sea ice concentration from 11 April 2015.Observations of trace gas gradients during this campaign defined the region inside the polar dome as north of 69 • 30 N and below 280.5 K (∼ 3.5 km) (Bozem et al., 2018).Zonal mean potential temperature cross sections from ECMWF for the period 7-13 April 2015 generally agree with this definition of the polar dome, and this demonstrates that our observations were made in the coldest air masses present in the Arctic region during this time (Fig. S7).CO concentrations observed in the polar dome were consistent with "Arctic background" air masses identified in previous airborne observations and with monthly mean CO concentrations at Alert, Nunavut, Canada (Fig. S8).This suggests that our observations during April 2015 in the polar dome were not strongly impacted by episodic transport events of high pollutant concentrations (Brock et al., 2011).We restrict our analysis to those air masses residing in the polar dome, to determine the sources and processes contributing to aerosol composition within this region during spring.When discussing observations and model predictions, we use potential temperature instead of height or pressure for two reasons.First, the location of the polar dome and transport northward are dictated by potential temperature rather than absolute height.Second, trace gases and aerosol observed in the polar dome varied systematically with potential temperature, but showed less systematic variability with pressure (Fig. S9).Altitude profiles of absolute and potential temperature are shown in Fig. S10.In this section, we discuss transport patterns inferred from trace gas observations and FLEXPART-ECMWF air mass history, and in Sect.3.2 we discuss observed aerosol composition in the context of these transport patterns.
Trends in trace gas concentrations with potential temperature illustrate different transport regimes within the polar dome (Fig. 2).Based on the mean vertical profiles of trace gases, we divided observed vertical profiles into three ranges of potential temperature (Fig. 2: 245-252, 252-265 and 265-280 K) to guide interpretation of air mass history, transport characteristics and aerosol composition in the polar dome.We refer to these three ranges of potential temperature as the  lower, middle and upper polar dome, respectively (dashed horizontal lines in Fig. 2), and discuss the characteristics of each region in turn.First, in the coldest and driest air masses (245-252 K), we consistently observed temperature inversion conditions, with potential temperature increasing by 37 K km −1 compared to 11 K km −1 above the lower polar dome (Fig. S10).Temperature inversions are frequent in the High Arctic spring, with median inversion strengths of ∼ 5-10 K occurring frequently in March, April and May (Bradley et al., 1992;Tjernström and Graversen, 2009;Zhang et al., 2011;Devasthale et al., 2016).Owing to the static stability of the lower polar dome under these conditions, these air masses may be isolated from the air aloft and may be sensitive to different sources and transport history (Stohl, 2006).Under these stable conditions, CO and CO 2 were relatively constant (mean (quartile range), 144.5 (144.2-146.5) ppb v and 405.8 (405.4-406.2) ppm v , respectively) in the lower polar dome and O 3 was depleted to 11.4 (3.1-23.4)ppb v .Active halogen production and resulting O 3 depletion may occur largely at the surface (e.g., Spackman et al., 2010;Oltmans et al., 2012;Abbatt et al., 2012;Pratt et al., 2013).It follows that the observed O 3 profile could be interpreted as an indication of mixing of O 3 -depleted air from the surface up to ∼ 252 K (∼ 400 m).Particle number concentrations between 100 and 500 nm (N 100-500 ) were relatively constant in the lower polar dome (∼ 150 cm −3 ), while larger accumulation mode particles (N >500 ) were most abundant in the lower polar dome compared to higher potential temperatures (∼ 4 cm −3 compared to < 1 cm −3 ).Second, in the middle polar dome (252-265 K), O 3 increased toward ∼ 50 ppb v and CO and CO 2 remained relatively constant while water vapour showed more variability.Finally, at the highest potential temperatures we observed more variability in CO, CO 2 and H 2 O, while O 3 concentrations were relatively constant at 49.6 (45.7-54.1)ppb v .N >500 was near zero in the upper po-lar dome, while N 100-500 showed more variability compared to colder potential temperatures.
The importance of lower latitude source regions increases as potential temperature increases in the polar dome.The distribution of FLEXPART-ECMWF potential emission sensitivities (Fig. 3) indicates that most air masses in the lower and middle polar dome had resided there for at least 10 days, with significant sensitivity to the surface north of 80 • N and some sensitivity to high-latitude Eurasia.The fraction of the previous 10 days spent in the polar dome is highest in the middle and lower polar dome, while above ∼ 265 K this quantity decreases significantly (Fig. 4, S8).This observation indicates a clear separation in air mass history between the middle-tolower polar dome and the upper polar dome.Sensitivity to lower latitude regions increases as potential temperature increases in the polar dome, particularly in high-latitude Eurasia and North America (Fig. 3).Locations of active fires during 28 March 2015-13 April 2015 and of oil and gas extraction emissions (Fig. 3) indicate that biomass burning emissions likely had a stronger influence on the upper polar dome, while oil and gas extraction emissions may be more important in the lower polar dome.Total March-May 2015 fire counts in the Northern Hemisphere were comparable to previous years (Fig. S12), but were significantly lower than 2008.This suggests that biomass burning sources are often less important sources of Arctic aerosol than has been suggested by previous observations from the year 2008 (e.g., Warneke et al., 2009;Brock et al., 2011;Hecobian et al., 2011;McNaughton et al., 2011;Liu et al., 2015).
A prevalent feature of air mass histories in the lower and middle polar dome is descent from aloft over at least 10 days prior to our measurements (Fig. 3g, h).The FLEXPART-ECMWF-predicted plume centroid also shows some evidence for descent in the upper polar dome (Fig. 3i), though we note that descent from aloft in the plume centroid does not preclude some sensitivity to the surface.Air mass descent in the polar dome is likely caused by a combination of both radiative cooling (on the order of 1 K day −1 ; Klonecki et al., 2003) and orographic effects over nearby elevated terrain on Ellesmere Island and Greenland.With long aerosol lifetimes under cold and relatively dry conditions in the polar dome, this suggests that aerosol in the upper polar dome can influence the lower and middle polar dome on the timescale of 10 days and longer.Transport times to the Arctic lower troposphere are likely longer than 10 days (e.g., Brock et al., 2011;Qi et al., 2017;Leaitch et al., 2018), suggesting that a major springtime transport mechanism may be lofting near source regions, followed by northward transport and descent into the polar dome (Stohl, 2006).In the next section, we discuss observed aerosol composition in the context of these transport patterns.

Aerosol composition in the polar dome
Vertical variability in aerosol composition was systematic across flights in the polar dome during April 2015.Submicron aerosol present in the coldest air masses of the lower polar dome contained the highest fraction of sulfate (74 % by mass, Fig. 5).This trend in the sulfate mass fraction (mf SO 4 ) was driven by both decreasing sulfate and increasing organic aerosol concentrations as potential temperature  increased (Figs. 6,S5).This observation is broadly consistent with previous vertically resolved measurements of aerosol sulfate in both the Canadian Arctic and Alaskan Arctic during spring that have indicated increasing sulfate concentrations toward lower altitudes (Scheuer et al., 2003;Bourgeois and Bey, 2011).Large contributions of sulfate to nearsurface Arctic spring aerosol is also consistent with groundbased observations at long-term monitoring stations including Zeppelin, Svalbard; Alert, Nunavut; and Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska (e.g., Barrie and Hoff, 1985;Quinn et al., 2007;Breider et al., 2017;Leaitch et al., 2018).The mass fraction of ammonium (mf NH 4 ) increases with increasing potential temperature.This trend is driven by both decreasing sulfate concentration and increasing ammonium concentration as potential temperature increases (Fig. 6).This observation is broadly consistent with previous vertically resolved measurements in the North American Arctic from April 2008 that demonstrated increased ammonium relative to sulfate toward higher altitudes (Fisher et al., 2011).However, Fisher et al. ( 2011) observed significantly higher ammonium relative to sulfate compared to our measurements.These differences may arise from the larger altitude range in Fisher et al.
(2011) (up to ∼ 10 km) and differences in source regions or source strengths between 2008 and 2015.Organic aerosol and refractory black carbon were more abundant in the upper polar dome, while sulfate was less abundant.On average, OA and rBC contributed 42 % and 2 % to aerosol mass, respectively, in the upper polar dome.OA was highly oxygenated throughout the polar dome, with oxygen-to-carbon (O / C) ratios above 0.5 in the majority of measurements (Fig. S13).High O / C ratios are consistent with an abundance of highly functionalized organic acids observed in Arctic haze aerosol at Alert, Nunavut, during spring (Kawamura et al., 1996(Kawamura et al., , 2005(Kawamura et al., , 2010;;Narukawa et al., 2008;Fu et al., 2009;Leaitch et al., 2018).Owing to the lack of  unique mass spectral fragments from this highly oxygenated OA, our ToF-AMS spectra cannot distinguish differences in OA composition in the polar dome.Overall, our observations suggest that surface-based measurements may underestimate the contribution of OA, rBC and ammonium to aerosol transported to the Arctic troposphere in spring.
Air masses spent the longest times in the middle to lower polar dome (Fig. 4), and aerosol composition varied systematically with time spent in this portion of the polar dome.The mass fractions of OA and rBC decrease with the FLEXPART-ECMWF-predicted fraction of the previous 10 days spent north of 69 • 30 N and below 265 K (Fig. 7).OA and rBC were well-correlated in the middle and upper polar dome (Fig. S14), suggesting that these species have a similar source region and/or have undergone similar processing.A dominance of anthropogenic (fossil fuel) sources of black carbon to the High Arctic during April 2015 may explain this relationship between rBC and OA.The importance of anthropogenic emissions of black carbon from eastern and southern Asia to measured Arctic black carbon in spring was recently demonstrated using a chemical transport model constrained by our measurements of black carbon in combination with surface sites and previous aircraft-based campaigns (Xu et al., 2017).European and north Asian anthropogenic emissions contributed significantly to Arctic black carbon in the lowest kilometre, with eastern and southern Asian sources increasing in importance toward higher altitudes (Xu et al., 2017).Southern Asian regions are not wellrepresented in 10-day FLEXPART-ECMWF backward simulations, which likely do not capture transport back to all source regions (Qi et al., 2017;Leaitch et al., 2018).OA and rBC are largely uncorrelated in the lower polar dome, suggesting shifting source regions and/or chemical processing of OA toward lower potential temperatures.This observation is consistent with multi-year observations from Alert, Nunavut, showing that black carbon and organic matter are correlated during winter, but become uncorrelated during spring (Leaitch et al., 2018).
In contrast to OA and rBC, the mass fraction of sulfate increases with increasing time spent in the middle-to-lower polar dome (Fig. 7).In the upper polar dome the ammoniumto-sulfate molar ratio is at times consistent with ammonium bisulfate, while more sulfuric acid is likely present at lower potential temperatures.The enhanced fraction of sulfate in the lower polar dome compared to higher potential temperatures could arise from a combination of possible mechanisms.First, the stability of the polar dome may cause systematic vertical variability in source regions throughout the polar dome (e.g., Stohl, 2006).The observed middle-tolower polar dome aerosol composition could arise from highlatitude, sulfur-rich emissions in the absence of significant ammonia and organic aerosol sources.A complex mixture of natural and anthropogenic sources has previously been shown to contribute to observed variations in sulfate and ammonium with altitude in Arctic spring (Fisher et al., 2011).In the lowest 2 km, emissions from non-Arctic Russia and Kazakhstan (included as part of eastern and southern Asia in Xu et al., 2017), along with North American emissions, were the dominant sources of sulfate in April 2008 (Fisher et al., 2011).At higher altitudes, model results suggested eastern Asian sources of sulfate became more important and, along with European sources, were the main contributor of sulfate aerosol in Arctic spring.Second, and possibly in addition to shifting source regions, aerosol composition could be changing as a result of chemical processing over the long aerosol lifetime.The fraction of sulfate could be increasing with decreasing potential temperature as a result of oxidation of transported sulfur dioxide and subsequent condensation of sulfuric acid onto existing particles as air masses slowly descend (Fig. 3).In addition, oxidation of existing OA, resulting in fragmentation and loss of aerosol mass to the gas phase, could contribute to a decrease in OA concentrations toward lower altitudes (e.g., Kroll et al., 2009); however, this process may be less important at low temperatures.Descent from aloft appears to be an important transport mechanism influencing the lower polar dome in our flight area, lending some support to this second set of processes.Finally, wet removal or cloud processing of aerosol over long transport times likely impacts the aerosol composition we observe, though we cannot distinguish this influence with our measurements.In the next section, we examine the characteristics of lower polar dome aerosol in detail and compare it to aerosol present in the middle and upper polar dome.

Characteristics of lower polar dome aerosol
Lower polar dome air masses had resided for the longest times within the polar dome (Figs. 3,4 and S11)  that this aerosol likely had a lifetime of 10 days or longer.This aerosol was comprised largely of sulfate, with smaller amounts of OA, rBC and ammonium compared to aerosol present in the middle and upper polar dome (Sect.3.2).In addition, ToF-AMS spectra provide qualitative evidence for the presence of sea salt aerosol in the lower polar dome, which decreases to negligible concentrations through the middle polar dome (Fig. 8).The ToF-AMS NaCl + signal and N >500 have a similar profile, suggesting that sea salt may be associated with the increase in larger accumulation mode particles observed in the lower polar dome.This observation is consistent with previous airborne measurements in the Alaskan Arctic during spring that showed the largest fraction of sea salt particles were present in air masses identified as associated with the "Arctic boundary layer" (i.e., identified by depleted O 3 concentrations) (Brock et al., 2011).Sea salt contributes significantly to aerosol observed at groundbased long-term monitoring stations (e.g., Quinn et al., 2002;Leaitch et al., 2013;Huang and Jaeglé, 2017;Leaitch et al., 2018), and peaks in concentration during winter to early spring.Sources of sea salt at high northern latitudes in spring include transport of sea salt from northern oceans, production of sea salt aerosol from open leads in sea ice (e.g., Leck et al., 2002;Held et al., 2011;May et al., 2016), and production of saline aerosol through wind driven processes over ice and snow (Yang et al., 2008;Shaw et al., 2010;Xu et al., 2016;Huang and Jaeglé, 2017).The strong decrease in NaCl + signal and N >500 above the lower polar dome is suggestive of a near-surface source of sea salt in the High Arctic; open leads or wind-driven ice and snow processes may contribute to lower polar dome aerosol.Recent observations at Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska, have demonstrated the prevalence of sea salt aerosol in Arctic winter and significant mixing with sulfate (Kirpes et al., 2018).Sulfate may be internally mixed with sea salt in the lower polar dome; however, owing to low particle concentrations we are unable to obtain an NaCl + signal from size-resolved mass spectra.Size-resolved observations of non-refractory aerosol composition provide evidence for different particle mixing states across the size distribution.On average, sulfate was present in larger particle sizes in the lower polar dome compared to the middle and upper polar dome (Fig. 9).In contrast, OA size distributions were very similar in the lower and upper polar dome (Fig. S15).In the lower polar dome, the fraction of sulfate increases with particle size (Fig. 9), implying the presence of different particle mixing states, and different particle sources or chemical processing in the polar dome.Single-particle observations from two flights (Figs. 10, S16) are consistent with these bulk size-resolved observations.Accumulation mode particles were highly internally mixed, consistent with very aged particles, but the presence of sulfate-rich and organic-rich particles was discernible from cluster analysis of ToF-AMS spectra.Sulfate-rich particles were dominant in the coldest air masses and were larger in size compared to organic-rich particles (Figs. 10 and  S16).Increasing sulfate fraction toward larger particle sizes (Fig. 9) suggests that sulfuric acid may have condensed on existing particles, growing them to larger sizes.An increase in aerosol sulfate toward lower altitudes and a simultaneous decrease in gas phase SO 2 has been observed previously in Arctic spring; this could be consistent with oxidation of SO 2 and condensation on pre-existing particles in the lowest 1-2 km (Bourgeois and Bey, 2011).Barrie and Hoff (1984) estimated a mean oxidation rate of SO 2 to sulfuric acid in April of 2.4 % day −1 -4.8 % day −1 , which could explain the enhanced concentrations of sulfate toward lower potential temperatures in our observations.While the smaller OA size in the lower polar dome could be consistent with loss of OA mass through fragmentation processes, similar OA size distributions in the lower and upper polar dome appear to negate this possibility (Fig. S15).Our observations do not distinguish unambiguously between vertical variability in source composition, chemical processing during descent in the polar dome, and wet removal or cloud processing during transport.All processes likely contribute to the systematic vertical variability in High Arctic aerosol composition that we observe.

Conclusions
In the Arctic spring polar dome, aerosol composition and trace gas concentrations varied systematically with potential temperature.We defined the lower (245-252 K), middle (252-265 K) and upper (265-280 K) polar dome based on vertical profiles of trace gases.The contribution of sulfate increased from the upper to lower polar dome (mean mass frac-tions 48 % and 74 %, respectively), while organic aerosol, refractory black carbon and ammonium were more abundant in the upper polar dome (mean mass fractions 42 %, 2 % and 8 %, respectively).At the lowest potential temperatures, in the lower polar dome, sulfate-rich particles were present at larger accumulation mode sizes compared to the upper polar dome.
While observations at long-term monitoring stations provide the majority of our knowledge about Arctic aerosol, decoupling of air masses near the surface from the rest of the polar dome means that surface-based observations may not represent the altitude-dependent composition of aerosol transported to the Arctic troposphere.Our observations indicate that long-term, surface-based measurements may underestimate the contribution of organic aerosol, refractory black carbon and ammonium to aerosol transported to the High Arctic troposphere in spring, while overestimating the contribution of sulfate.In addition, our observations of sea salt signals in the lower polar dome suggest that the significant sea salt concentrations observed at long-term monitoring stations in spring may not occur throughout the depth of the polar dome.
Systematic differences in aerosol composition with potential temperature likely arise through a combination of mechanisms.First, aerosol from different source regions, with differing composition, arrives at a range of potential temperatures in a stable atmosphere.Second, aerosol composition can be altered by chemical processing of transported aerosol and sulfur dioxide during descent into the polar dome over periods of 10 days or longer.Third, wet removal and cloud processing near emission and along the transport path may impact the composition of aerosol arriving in the polar dome, though this influence is difficult to distinguish with our observations.Modelled air mass history from FLEXPART-ECMWF demonstrates that this systematic www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/57/2019/Atmos.Chem.Phys., 19, 57-76, 2019 variation in aerosol composition is in part related to differing transport regimes as a function of potential temperature.In the lower polar dome, air masses had resided in the High Arctic region for at least 10 days prior to measurement and had largely descended from higher altitudes.Some sensitivity to the High Arctic surface could explain the observed sea salt in the lower polar dome.Lower latitude source regions in Europe, Asia and North America became more important toward higher potential temperatures in the upper polar dome.
Long transport times make source diagnosis difficult using 10-day backward trajectories, and chemical processing during long Arctic residence times contributes to challenges in identifying source regions of lower polar dome aerosol.Using our observations, we cannot quantitatively distinguish the relative importance of vertical variability in source composition, chemical processing during descent in the polar dome, and removal or cloud processing during transport.Our observations present a challenge to chemical transport models for their representation of the processes impacting High Arctic aerosol in spring.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Map of the NETCARE 2015 campaign study area, showing sea ice concentrations on 11 April 2015 (Spreen et al., 2008).All stations along the NETCARE/PAMARCMiP 2015 track are shown with yellow stars (Longyearbyen, Svalbard; Alert, Nunavut; Eureka, Nunavut; Resolute Bay, Nunavut; and Inuvik, Northwest Territories).Parallels are shown in dashed circles at 60, 70 and 80 • N. Inset: flight tracks from six flights during 7-13 April 2015 based in Alert and Eureka, Nunavut, which are the focus of this work.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Mean potential temperature profiles of trace gases (CO, CO 2 , O 3 and H 2 O) and particle concentrations (N 100-500 and N >500 ) in the polar dome observed during 7-13 April 2015.Coloured lines indicate the mean profile for each flight, the black line represents the mean profile over all flights, and gray shading shows the range of observations in each potential temperature bin.Horizontal dashed blue lines separate the lower, middle and upper polar dome defined as 245-252, 252-265 and 265-280 K.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. FLEXPART-ECMWF potential emission sensitivity (PES) and plume centroid altitude averaged over three potential temperature ranges in the polar dome.(a-c) Mean total column PES, (d-f) mean partial column (< 200 m) PES, (g-i) mean plume centroid altitudes for 245-252 K (a, d, g), 252-265 K (b, e, h) and 265-280 K (c, f, i).Fire locations during 28 March to 13 April 2015 from MODIS are purple points, gas flaring locations associated with oil and gas extraction from the ECLIPSE emission inventory (V5) for 2015 are light blue points.Parallels are shown in dashed circles at 45, 60 and 80 • N.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Mean potential temperature profiles of relative aerosol composition, including mass fractions of sulfate (mf SO 4 ), organic aerosol (mf OA ), refractory black carbon (mf rBC ), and ammonium (mf NH 4 ), in the polar dome observed during 7-13 April 2015.Coloured lines indicate the mean profile for each flight, the black line represents the mean profile over all six flights, and gray shading shows the range of observations in each potential temperature bin.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Mean potential temperature profiles of absolute (STP) sub-micron aerosol composition in the polar dome observed during 7-13 April 2015, including sulfate, organics and ammonium from the ToF-AMS and refractory black carbon (rBC) from the SP2.Nitrate concentrations were negligible, and largely below detection limits.Coloured lines indicate the mean profile for each flight, the black line represents the mean profile over all six flights, and gray shading shows the range of observations in each potential temperature bin.Single points at the lowest potential temperature represent concentrations of sulfate, ammonium and rBC measured at Alert, NU, during 6-13 April 2015 from Macdonald et al. (2017).Points represent the mean concentration and error bars represent measurement uncertainty.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Sub-micron aerosol mass fractions versus FLEXPART-ECMWF-predicted fraction of the previous 10 days prior to measurement spent in the middle-to-lower polar dome (north of 69 • 30 N, Bozem et al., 2018, and, based on trace gas profiles, below 265 K, ∼ 1600 m).Data points corresponding to individual FLEXPART-ECMWF releases are shown as circles, and summary statistics are shown as boxes (25th, 50th, 75th percentiles) and whiskers (5th, 95th percentiles) for data binned by time spent in the middle and lower polar dome.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Potential temperature profiles of the ToF-AMS NaCl + signal (top axis), as a qualitative indication of the presence of sea salt aerosol, and N >500 (bottom axis).The solid lines represent the mean profile for 7-13 April 2015, and shading represents the range of measurements in each potential temperature bin.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. (a) Normalized mean ToF-AMS size distributions of sulfate subset by observed potential temperature: below 252 K (black), above 265 K (light blue).(b) ToF-AMS size distributions of sulfate (red) and total organic aerosol (green) below 252 K.The mass fraction of sulfate calculated from ToF-AMS size distributions is shown on the right axis in black circles, and is calculated only between 200 and 600 nm owing to low OA signals at smaller and larger sizes.Shading corresponds to ±1 standard deviation for sulfate and organic aerosol size distributions, and the relatively large variation in size-resolved composition indicates that the derived mass fraction of sulfate as a function of size is uncertain.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Summary of k-means cluster analysis of 1677 single-particle (ETSP) spectra obtained on two flights (8 and 13 April 2015).(a) Bar chart of relative ion fraction scaled by the relative ionization efficiency (RIE) of each species, for two particle classes obtained by kmeans cluster analysis.Particle class 1 is referred to as "organic-rich" and class 2 is referred to as "sulfate-rich".(b) Mean size distributions (expressed as dSignal/d log Dva, Hz) of the two particle classes (points) and Gaussian fits to the observations (lines).(c) Mean relative abundance of class 1 (green, organic-rich) and class 2 (red, sulfate-rich) binned by potential temperature.Horizontal lines represent the divisions between the lower, middle and upper polar dome.