<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-4899-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Compliance and port air quality features with respect to ship fuel switching regulation:
a field observation campaign, SEISO-Bohai</article-title><alt-title>Compliance and port air quality features with respect to ship fuel switching
regulation</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Compliance and port air quality features with respect to ship fuel switching
regulation}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y. Zhang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yanni</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>Fanyuan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Man</surname><given-names>Hanyang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>Mingliang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>Zhaofeng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>Qian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>Xinxin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Shuai</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Kebin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Huan</given-names></name>
          <email>liu_env@tsinghua.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2217-0591</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Joint Laboratory of ESPC, School of Environment, Tsinghua
University, Beijing 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control
of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing, 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment
(SKLECRA), Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing,
100012, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Huan Liu (liu_env@tsinghua.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>11</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>4899</fpage><lpage>4916</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>13</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e176">Since 1 January 2017, ships berthed at the core ports of three designated “domestic emission control
areas” (DECAs) in China should be using fuel with a sulfur content less than
or equal to 0.5 %. In order to evaluate the impacts of fuel switching, a
measurement campaign (SEISO-Bohai) was conducted from 28 December 2016 to
15 January 2017 at Jingtang Harbor, an area within the seventh busiest port
in the world. This campaign included meteorological monitoring, pollutant
monitoring, aerosol sampling and fuel sampling. During the campaign, 16 ship
plumes were captured by the on-shore measurement site, and 4 plumes indicated
the usage of high-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the sulfur content of marine fuels).
The average reduction of the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio from high-sulfur
plumes (3.26) before 1 January to low-sulfur plumes (12.97) after 1 January
shows a direct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reduction of 75 %, consistent with
the sulfur content reduction (79 %). The average concentrations of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (particulate matter with a diameter less than 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO during
campaign were 147.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
146.93, 21.91, 29.68 ppb and 2.21 ppm, respectively, among
which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached a maximum hourly concentration of 692.6 ppb, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached a maximum hourly concentration of 165.5 ppb.
The mean concentrations of carbonaceous and dominant ionic
species in particles were 6.52 (EC – elemental carbon), 23.10 (OC – organic carbon), 22.04 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 25.95
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 13.55 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Although the carbonaceous species in particles were not significantly
affected by fuel switching, the gas and particle pollutants in the ambient air
exhibited clear and effective improvements due to the implementation of low-sulfur
fuel. Comparison with the prevailing atmospheric conditions and a wind map of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation concluded a prompt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction of 70 % in
ambient air after fuel switching. Given the high humidity at the study site, this
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction will abate the concentration of secondary aerosols and improve
the acidity of particulate matter. Based on the enrichment factors of elements in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, vanadium was identified as a marker of residual fuel ship
emissions, decreasing significantly by 97.1 % from 309.9 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> before fuel switching to 9.1 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after regulation, which
indicated a crucial improvement due to the implementation of low-sulfur
fuels. Ship emissions were proven to be significantly influential both
directly and indirectly on the port environment and the coastal areas around Bohai
Bay, where the population density reaches over 650 people per square kilometer. The
results from this study report the positive impact of fuel
switching on the air quality in the study region and indicate
a new method for identifying the ship fuel type used by vessels in the area.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e465">Maritime transport is an important source of pollutants globally; thus, it is
one of the well-established culprits regarding the adverse effects of ship
emissions on air quality (Eyring et al., 2005, 2010; Endresen et al., 2003;
Fridell et al., 2008; Jalkanen et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2016; Viana et al.,
2014), climate (Lauer et al., 2007; Tronstad Lund et al., 2012; Liu<?pagebreak page4900?> et al.,
2016) and human health (Campling et al., 2013; Corbett et al., 2007;
Winebrake et al., 2009). Estimations show that ships contribute 15 % of
the global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in addition to 4 %–9 % of
the global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Eyring et al., 2010). In the EU 27, ships
emitted 2.8 million tons of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1.7 million tons of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.2 million tons of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2005, from which
approximately 70 % was emitted within 200 nmi of the coast of EU member
states (Campling et al., 2013). From 2006 to 2009, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions from ships rose by approximately 7 % in the Baltic Sea, while
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions decreased by 14 % and 20 %,
respectively, which was mainly caused by fuel regulations that came into
effect in 2006 (Jalkanen et al., 2014). In 2011, ship emissions in Europe
were estimated to be responsible for 2.0 million tons of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1.2 million tons of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.2 million tons
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Jalkanen et al., 2016). According to the United Nations
Conference on Trade And Development (UNCTAD, 2017), the volume of the world's
seaborne trade grew by 66 % between 2000 and 2015. As global commerce
expands, ocean-going vessels consume more fuels – generally low-quality
residual fuels containing high concentrations of sulfur and heavy metals
(Lack et al., 2011) – which differ greatly from inland fuel usage. In China,
the average sulfur content of marine fuel (average S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) was
2.43 % (by mass, i.e., 24 300 ppm) before regulation (Liu et al.,
2016), which was much higher than the sulfur content restriction of 10 ppm
that was applied to inland fuels (Chinese national standards GB 19147-2013
and GB 17930-2013). This makes ships one of the prominent contributors of
pollutant emissions in major port cities (Lai et al., 2013; HKEPD, 2014; Zhao
et al., 2013). Estimations of ship emissions within 200 nmi of the Chinese
coast have shown that ships accounted for an annual increase of up to
5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in eastern China, which influenced the
air quality not only in coastal areas but also in inland areas that are
hundreds of kilometers from the sea (Lv et al., 2018). In 2010, ships
contributed 12.0 % of the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, 9.0 %
of the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and 5.3 % of the total
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in Shanghai (Fu et al., 2012). Furthermore, 14.1 %
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, 11.6 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and
3.6 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions within the Pearl River Delta
region, China, were attributed to ships in 2013 (Li et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e686">These situations have drawn a lot of attention regarding coastal air
pollution and related emission control strategies, such as scrubbers.
However, recent research has also reported the potential pollution of surface
waters by ship emissions due to certain methods of treating ship exhausts
(Hassellöv et al., 2013; Stips et al., 2016; Turner et al., 2017, 2018),
indicating that the exhaust aftertreatment may not be the best choice of ship emission reduction.
The International Maritime Organization (IMO), the European Union and the US have implemented
regulations in an effort to reduce ship emissions, among which fuel quality
regulation has proven potent in many countries for addressing the issue of
sulfur oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and particulate matter (PM) emissions.
The IMO has regulated the S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on a global scale from the current value
of 3.5 % to 0.5 % by 2020, and has implemented more stringent
legislation in designated emission control areas (ECAs), which with respect
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions include the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the
English Channel, and coastal waters around the Canada, US and the US
Caribbean Sea. The S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> allowed in ECAs was 1 % in 2010 and has
been reduced to 0.1 % since 1 January 2015 (IMO, 2008). Estimation in European seas shows
that this IMO limitation of 0.1 % S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in ECAs would reduce
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions by 82 % by 2020 and decrease the amount of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by a further 23 000 tons by 2030 (Campling
et al., 2013). This assumption is supported by other comparable results from
subregion assessment and in site measurements (Matthias et al., 2010; Viana
et al., 2015; Zetterdahl et al., 2016). Likewise, EU Directive 2012/33/EU has
demanded that ships at berth in European Union ports use fuels with a
S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.1 % since December 2012, which reduced
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from ships by about 50 % between 2007 and 2012 in
Venice, Italy (Contini et al., 2015). Beginning in July 2009, the US state of
California introduced legislations limiting vessels operating within 24
nautical miles (44 km) of the California coastline to the use of marine gas
oil (MGO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) with a maximum S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of
1.5 % or 0.5 %, respectively (from January 2012 S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
content was restricted to &lt; 0.1 %) (CARB, 2009). As a result, a
clear improvement in the air quality was observed at the Port of Oakland and
in the surrounding San Francisco Bay area in 2010 (Tao et al., 2013). Lack et
al. (2011) also reported that fuel quality regulation along with speed
restriction in California could potentially generate an 88 % reduction in
gaseous and particle pollutant concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d1e797">Based on the abovementioned widely acclaimed fuel quality regulations, China promulgated
the implementation of the ship emission control area in the Pearl River
Delta, the Yangtze River Delta and the Bohai Rim (Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
area) (MOT, 2015) in 2015, designing three DECAs with phased S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
requirements. Since 1 January 2017, ships berthed at the core port of these three
DECAs should be using fuel with a S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> less than or equal to 0.5 %. This
new regulation provides the opportunity to measure the influence of
limiting the S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the magnitude of ship emissions in China. However,
compared with fuel regulations in Canada, Europe and the US, which have undergone years of enforcement and optimization,
the Chinese regulation is incipient in clauses and
vague in terms of supervision. The possible effects of ship emission control
are indeed compelling, but they are also difficult to evaluate due to the variability
of complicated local emission sources and the complexity of fleet management.
Until now, much of the previous research on the subject of ship emission
control has been restricted to limited comparisons of emissions, which have failed to
specify the compliance of vessels or a practical method to indicate it.</p>
      <p id="d1e827">In order to explore the methods used to capture fuel-related emission change and
the impact on the air quality due to fuel switching, we selected the Bohai<?pagebreak page4901?> Rim
(Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei area) as the study site and conducted in situ
measurements of meteorological parameters and pollutants along with chemical analyses of
sampled fuels and aerosols, which are all typical methods utilized within the
field of air quality measurement. The campaign ran from 27 December 2016 to 15 January 2017, covering the primary implementation period of the new regulation. By
comparing ship emissions and air quality before and after fuel switching,
this paper sheds light on the potential emission reduction effects of
the enforced regulation. Meanwhile, certain features in ship plumes were
found to be related to fuel type, providing another angle for supervising
ship fuels in practice. This may be helpful in the actual implementation and
management of the new regulation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Field measurement</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>Measurement site</title>
      <p id="d1e852">The measurement station (39.204576<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 119.004028<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) for
the “Shipping Emission and Impacts by Switching Oil in Bohai Bay”
(SEISO-Bohai) campaign is located on the corner of a main navigational
channel to the third pool in Jingtang Harbor (hereafter referred to as JT),
on the property (and with the support of) the Hebei Tangshan Harbor Economic
Development Zone Office (Fig. 1). Located in Bohai Bay, JT belongs to the
Port of Tangshan, one of the core ports in the designated DECAs. China Port
Yearbook (2017) reported a total throughput of 520 million tons in the Port
of Tangshan, from which JT handled over 270 million tons. The population
density around JT and the surrounding “Port Economic Development Area” is
high, with over 650 people per square kilometer. JT is described in more
detail elsewhere (Xiao et al., 2018). The station consists of a measurement
container, which has a small meteorological monitoring station placed on the
roof, and aerosol sampling instruments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e875"><bold>(a)</bold> The location of Jingtang Harbor (JT), and the location of an official air quality
monitoring station, Xinli Elementary School (XL; map inset). <bold>(b)</bold> The
location of the measurement station (yellow marker) and the distribution of
pools, berths and loading areas in the port domain. Wind rose <bold>(c)</bold>,
daily variation of temperature <bold>(d)</bold> and relative humidity
<bold>(e)</bold> from the measurement station during the period from
28 December 2016 to 13 January 2017.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/4899/2019/acp-19-4899-2019-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>Meteorological monitoring</title>
      <p id="d1e906">A small meteorological monitoring station was placed on the roof of the
container and obtained temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), relative humidity (%),
wind speed (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), wind direction and radiation intensity
every 1 min, from 28 December 2016 to 15 January 2017. Abrupt high-temperature values were subtracted from the results as they were
obviously invalid data, for example, when an instrument indicated 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for ambient temperature
in winter.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>2.1.3</label><title>Particle and gas monitoring</title>
      <p id="d1e947">Continuous concentrations of six gases (NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ppb, and CO in ppm)
were measured every 1 min, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were measured every 1 h, using a Sailhero
XHAQMS3000 air quality continuous monitoring system, from 28 December 2016 to
13 January 2017. Monitoring modules consist of NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement using an analyzer, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detection
using a UV fluorometer, CO using IR absorption, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using UV
spectrophotometry and particles using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-ray absorption (ISO
10473:2000). The instrument displayed a short, erroneous measurement at the
beginning of the campaign, possibly due to unskilled operation, which
resulted in some negative values for gas pollutants and overexaggerated
values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The instrument was immediately
repaired, and the abovementioned values were removed to ensure the accuracy
of the data. Invalid values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred sporadically during the
campaign, appearing as a sinusoid fluctuation below 10 ppb, and were
subtracted from the results. It should be mentioned that the air quality of
Xinli Primary School (hereafter referred to as XL, an official air quality
monitor site as shown in Fig. 1) was provided by an official air quality
monitor and was used as a control (see in <uri>http://www.aqistudy.cn</uri>, last
access: 15 April 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>2.1.4</label><title>Particle samples</title>
      <p id="d1e1129">The campaign resulted in the collection of 14 valid particle samples: 2
parallel samples were collected per day before 31 December 2016 and 1 sample
was collected per day after that. The filters were exposed for 23 h
(normally from 16:30 to 15:30 LST, local standard time, the next day and
were labeled according to the end date) on 80 mm (diameter) preferred quartz
microfiber filters (CHM QF1 grade) using a Laoying Model 2030 TSP sampler.
All samples were immediately put into their original polyethylene plastic
boxes, wrapped in two layers of prebacked tinfoil, and then
subsequently housed in a refrigerator. In order to avoid any possible
contamination of the samples, all of the abovementioned procedures were
strictly quality-controlled.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Chemical analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Carbon analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1148">A 0.55 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> section of each exposed filter and blank filters were
measured for organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) concentrations
using the thermal optical transmission method in a DRI 2001 organic
carbon/elemental carbon (OC/EC) analyzer. OC and EC values were determined
via the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments protocol
(referred to as the IMPROVE A method). Samples were heated in a completely
oxygen-free helium atmosphere, using four increasing temperature steps to
remove all of the OC on the filter, during which part of the OC was
pyrolyzed. Then the pure helium eluent was switched into a 10 %
oxygen/helium mixture in the oven and stepped to 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for EC
determination. OC and EC were detected using a flame ionization detector
after oxidation to carbon<?pagebreak page4902?> dioxide and then reduced to methane. The detection
limit of this analysis was 0.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for OC and
0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for EC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Ion analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1218">A 50 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> section of each exposed filter and blank filters were extracted
using 10 mL of ultra-pure water in an ultrasonic bath at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 30 min. Inorganic ions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were analyzed using
a DIONEX ICS-2100 ion chromatograph. The ion chromatograph system was
calibrated using a standard solution before the samples were run. Data
obtained from a sample were compared to data from the known standard,
achieving the identification and quantification of sample ions. The detection
limit was 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>Element analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1372">A 20 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> section of each exposed filter and blank filters were digested
using 25 mL of an 8 % HCl/3 %–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution in an ultrasonic bath
at 69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 3 h. The solutions were cooled, vortex mixed and then
placed in a centrifuge at 2800 rpm for 15 min to settle any insoluble
particle, from which a 5 mL aliquot was taken for the analysis of the following 30 elements using an X Series 2 ICP-MS mass
spectrometer: Be,
Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Sr, Mo, Ag,
Sn, Ba, La, Ce, Hg, TI, Pb, Th and U. Measured Be concentrations were generally 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
throughout the sampling period, and this species was consequently removed from the results. Cr
was also removed, as the blank value exceeded most of the sample results.
Several concentrations of Cd and Mo were below detection and were also removed.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1427">Observations of trace gases (ppb) and molar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (ppb ppb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in ship plumes.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">#</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Date and time</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wind</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Wind speed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Regression</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Background<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">direction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28 Dec 23:20–23:44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Northwest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">226</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">127.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.83</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29 Dec 04:08–04:32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">West</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">239.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">134.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.68</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29 Dec 06:52–07:40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">West</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">277.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">106.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.51</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30 Dec 08:36–09:12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">West–northwest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">161.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">35.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30 Dec 09:16–09:52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">West–northwest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">306.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.79</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">31 Dec 07:48–08:12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">West</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">331.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">31 Dec 21:40–22:20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">West</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">551.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.14</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.82</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">31 Dec 22:28–23:32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">West</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">438.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 Jan 15:36–16:08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">East–northeast</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">242.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">72.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.96</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 Jan 18:24–18:56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">East–northeast</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">122.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">72.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.81</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8 Jan 00:00–00:28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">North–northeast</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">176.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.66</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9 Jan 04:16–04:48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">North</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">183.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.76</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9 Jan 23:12–23:56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">West</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">226</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.85</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 Jan 05:08–05:32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">North</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">158.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">47.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.72</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11 Jan 18:16–18:48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">West–southwest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">115.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.00</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13 Jan 14:20–14:42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Northwest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">204.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.72</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1464"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Concentrations provided by an air monitoring station at
Xinli Primary School (XL).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Ship plume events</title>
      <p id="d1e2375">Identifying a “ship plume event” using direct and simultaneous measurements of trace
gases with in situ instruments aims at the surveillance of emissions and
fuel types utilized by passing ships. As the measurement site is in the
vicinity of the channel and the berths, when wind directions are favorable
for measurements ship plumes passing the instrument cause a distinctive
change in the measured components against background concentrations; these changes are
defined as a ship plume event. Several studies have confirmed that synchronic variation
in pollutant concentrations can be used to identify the occurrence of ship
plume events from<?pagebreak page4903?> observation made near the harbor (Alföldy et al., 2013;
Ault et al., 2010; Contini et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2006;
Kattner et al., 2015): <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, BC, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations and number concentrations of aerosol particles increase
simultaneously at the onset of the ship plume, whereas the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
decreases due to its reduction reaction with NO to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2445">Marine vessel plume number 9 showing the <bold>(b)</bold> ship plume
interval identified from <bold>(a)</bold> NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO
concentrations measured in Jingtang Harbor (JT) from 12:00 to 18:00 LST,
5 January 2017, and <bold>(c)</bold> the linear regression method for the
determination of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/4899/2019/acp-19-4899-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2504">Nitrogen compounds were abundant in the atmosphere in JT due to the heavy
traffic, whereas the source of high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions was rather
simple. Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes, were used
as an indicator of recent anthropogenic emissions. The background
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per day was set as the daily lowest concentration, and any
enhancement that was higher than 3 ppb was marked as the time stamp of a
possible ship emission event. For these time stamps, peaks in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along with simultaneous valleys in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
then identified in valid data. The signals were only validated when there
were significant peaks and clearly determinable backgrounds. Finally a ship
plume event was marked if the existence of ships was positive in the upwind
direction of those signals. The combination of the trace gas peak time, the
wind direction and the ship traffic information (times when ships left the
harbor or berthed) provided by marine administration in the port enabled the
identification of the ship responsible for the plume. For example, a ship
plume event was identified on 5 January 2017 from 15:36 to 16:08 (Fig. 2).
The times and conditions associated with 16 positively identified ship plume
events are listed in Table 1. Several situations made it difficult to
identify a ship plume event in our measurement. Firstly, there was a period
when not many ships entered the port due to the New Year holiday and poor
visibility from 1 to 4 January 2017. Secondly, the prevailing wind direction
indicated that our plumes would mainly have been from the second and the
third pools, where approximately half of the berths were actually under
construction and not in use. These conditions meant fewer plumes than
expected. Furthermore, rapid changes in the wind direction was sometimes
unfavorable with respect to the instruments' ability to capture the ship
plumes. Thirdly, the port is generally quite polluted (on over 50 % of
days, the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was above 115 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, see
Sect. 3.1.1), and the rather high concentration of existing pollutants may
mask the existence of a ship plume event. Moreover, the measurement site is
also in the vicinity of high land-based vehicular emissions (truck traffic),
which may be another interference.</p>
      <p id="d1e2604">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in ship plumes is widely used as an indicator
of S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Yang et al., 2016; Kattner et al., 2015; Balzani Löv et al., 2014).
However, in this study we aimed to explore another applicable indicator for
S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in China, as the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is often excluded from
ambient air measurements due to the fact that the ambient air quality standards (China
national standard GB 3095-2012) stipulates which six pollutants should be
monitored and excludes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The ratio of ship-emitted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., the
enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in observations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), is correlated with the fuel type, and rises if
ships switch to low-sulfur fuel (McLaren et al., 2012; Sinha et al.,
2003). Moreover, based on the ship information provided by JT, the size of
the berths and the design of the port, we found that ships in JT, especially those related
to identified plumes, were mainly consistent with respect to size, which implies similar
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in these plumes (IMO, 2015). Therefore, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio is appropriate to indicate the S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of ships in JT. Data
from ship plume events were averaged every<?pagebreak page4904?> 4 min, and a suitable baseline
point was set as the background concentration; this background was taken either before or after the ship
plume event in question. Then the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios were calculated via a two-sided linear least-squares regression of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using all points within each plume event, including the
baseline point (Fig. 2). This method is similar to that used for the
determination of emission ratios (McLaren et al., 2012) or
emission factors (Williams et al., 2009) in ship plumes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Properties of fuel samples</title>
      <p id="d1e2831">Intermediate fuel oil (IFO), also known as heavy fuel oil, is typically used by
marine vessels. IFO is the petroleum product left after all of the
other fractions from crude oil have been distilled. This product has a high density, carbon/hydrogen
ratio and sulfur content (varying from 2 % to 5 %) compared with gas
and oil products used by other means of transportation. In addition, IFO
contains high concentrations of organics and metals from the original crude oil.
IFOs are categorized into IFO380, IFO180 and IFO60
by their maximum viscosity measured at 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
and the fuel quality is generally better as the viscosity decreases (Table 2). Recent onboard
and in situ measurements have revealed that high-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel generally
creates higher sulfur, particle and soot emissions (Celo et al., 2015; Contini
et al., 2015; Cooper, 2003; Fridell et al., 2008; Lack et al., 2011;
Moldanová et al., 2009; Petzold et al., 2010; Sinha et al., 2003; Winnes
and Fridell, 2010; Winnes et al., 2016). A significant metal contribution
from residual fuel combustion has also been noted (Lake et al.,
2004), in addition to the contribution to the emission (Kweon et al., 2003; Lack et al.,
2011; Lee et al., 1998) and formation (Ault et al., 2010) of
particulate organic matter.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2855">Components of intermediate fuel oil (IFO), hybrid fuels, and marine gas
oils (MGOs) and marine diesel oils (MDOs).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="14">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fuel for</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center">IFOs </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1">Hybrid  </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry namest="col10" nameend="col14" align="center">MGOs &amp; MDOs </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">main engine</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1">fuels </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col10" nameend="col14" align="center"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center">Celo et  </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">Winnes et </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1">Zetterdahl  </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Celo et</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Winnes et</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry namest="col12" nameend="col14" align="center">This </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center">al. (2015) </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">al. (2016) </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1">et al. (2016) </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10">al. (2016)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11">al. (2016)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col12" nameend="col14" align="center">study </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">IFO380</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">IFO180</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">IFO60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Ship A</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">Ship B</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">Ship C</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Density at</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">988</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">970.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">957.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">988.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">943.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">982.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">892.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">854.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">846.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">848.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">853.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">846.3</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="3">w %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">S</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.23</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.22</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.96</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.58</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.48</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.092</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.119</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.38</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.08</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.065</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">86.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">85.71</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">87.22</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">87.93</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">87.13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">88.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">87.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">86.85</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">86.29</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">85.16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">84.78</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">86.83</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">H</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.51</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.05</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.68</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12.97</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">13.54</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">13.07</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">13.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">13.15</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.39</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.41</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.38</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.42</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.52</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.044</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.026</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">&lt; 0.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.027</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.026</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="7">mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Na</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.66</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.74</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Al</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.06</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">BD</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ti</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.36</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">BD</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">V</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">133.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">109.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">38</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">BD</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fe</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31.44</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.35</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ni</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">63.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">BD</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cu</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29.51</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">BD</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Zn</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">BD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">BD</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2858">BD refers to “below the detection limit”. “–” refers to “not reported”</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3673">Research has shown that ships in sulfur emission control areas (SECAs) switch
to marine diesel fuel (MDO), a cleaner fuel typically used to meet the
requirement of many fuel quality regulations and emission limits. Compared
with IFOs, MDOs have a lower density, a lower carbon/hydrogen ratio, and a
lower nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of IFOs), sulfur (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of IFOs)
and heavy metal (significant reduction) content (Table 2). Due to their low
S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, these cleaner fuels have proven to be better with
respect to emissions, and promise an overall reduction of emissions (Cooper
and Gustafsson, 2004) and the further issues of acidification and
eutrophication (Bengtsson et al., 2011; Fridell et al., 2008; Sinha et al.,
2003). Another record worth mentioning is that hybrid fuels, which blend IFO and
other low-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fuels to comply with S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> regulations, are
widely used by ships operating in SECAs (Winnes et al., 2016; Zetterdahl et
al., 2016), as the price of distillate fuels is an obstacle with respect to
ships completely abandoning IFOs. However, ISO 8217:2017, the current
benchmark regarding the quality of marine fuels on the market, does not
specify any limits on the physical and chemical parameters<?pagebreak page4905?> of hybrid fuels.
This causes large uncertainty with respect to the quality of these fuels, as
there are no formal standards for the quality of hybrid fuels except the
restrictions on S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. As Table 2 shows that the content of metals
in hybrid fuels are between those of IFOs and MDOs due to the blending;
however, the density, carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen are consistent with those
of IFOs, indicating a quality similar to that of IFOs, which has been proven
to be less of an improvement on particle emission and health impacts than
totally abandoning IFOs (Winnes et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e3734">In order to establish the fuel type ships were using after the implementation
of fuel restrictions in JT, three fuel samples were taken from three respective vessels berthed in JT
on 14 January 2017, and the fuel properties and
chemical composition of the fuels were analyzed according to the petroleum industry standard (SH)
and the national standard (GB) of China.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Backward trajectory analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e3746">Back trajectories were used to identify the origin and potential influences
of different source regions on the vanadium (V) concentrations during each
sampling day. The 24 h back trajectories of the air mass during each
sampling day were computed at 500 m a.g.l. (above ground level) using the
HYSPLIT 4 model (NOAA, 2013). The Global Data Assimilation System
(GDAS) meteorological data were used as input. Trajectories began at
08:00 UTC (16:00 LST, consistent with the sampling period) and were
calculated every 6 h.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Other parameters</title>
      <p id="d1e3758">The enrichment factor (EF) was used for the general evaluation of influences of
anthropogenic sources on the elemental contents of particles (Zhao et
al., 2013) and is calculated following Eq. (1):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M177" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aerosol</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crust</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aerosol</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration ratio of
the element of interest, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, to the reference element, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in aerosol, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crust</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
crust. We used the composition of the continental crust from
Wedepohl (1995) and used Al as the reference element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Species with
EF values less than 10 usually indicate a major crustal source, whereas species with
high EF values probably indicate a significant anthropogenic source.</p>
      <p id="d1e3867">The sulfur oxidation ratio (SOR) and the nitrogen oxidation ratio (NOR) are used to
elucidate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution (Ohta and
Okita, 1990; Ostro, 1995; Wang et al., 2005) according to the following equations:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M187" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NOR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where the square brackets represent molar concentrations in units of mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A SOR/NOR value above 0.1 indicates a photochemical redox reaction of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ambient air. Higher SOR and NOR values indicate
larger amounts of secondary sulfate and nitrate formation
(Khoder, 2002).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page4906?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Impacts on port air quality from fuel switching</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{SO_{{2}}}$} reduction in the polluted port area}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction in the polluted port area</title>
      <p id="d1e4088">The climate of JT is strongly influenced by the sea breeze. The mean
relative humidity during campaign was 69.4 % (ranging from 21.8 % to
99.9 %), while the mean temperature was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Temperature
exhibited a clear diurnal cycle: it was lowest before dawn (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C),
rose after sunrise (07:00 LST) and reached a maximum (14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
at 14:00 LST (Fig. 1). The prevailing wind directions were west (23.4 %) and
north-northwest (13.0 %), and the wind speed mainly ranged between 1 and 4 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(2.7 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average). Coastal meteorological patterns, such as those
mentioned above, play an important role in the dispersion, transformation, accumulation
or removal of air pollutants (Gariazzo et al., 2007).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4165">Hourly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations measured in Jingtang Harbor (JT) from
28 December 2016 to 13 January 2017.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=332.897244pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/4899/2019/acp-19-4899-2019-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4225">During the campaign, the day-to-day variation in emission was large due to
variation in both the complicated sources and removal in JT; however, the
data generally exhibited a heavily polluted environment in JT. As the primary
pollutant at site, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were used to classify the local
pollution level. On over 50 % of days, the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was
above 115 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the Grade IV criterion of China's
daily air quality standard (HJ 633-2012) (Fig. 3), and the mean concentration
during the campaign (147.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was much higher than that
of city area of Tangshan (117.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the same
season (Zhang et al., 2017). The PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was even three
times the wintertime PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration observed in Hong Kong (Gao et
al., 2016), and twice that reported at the Yangshan Port, Shanghai (Zhao et
al., 2013). This suggests severe air pollution in JT, which is understandable
as winter (December–February) is the most polluted period in Tangshan due to
the higher emissions and unfavorable atmospheric conditions (e.g., lower
mixing heights and more frequent temperature inversions). Since December
2013, when an official air quality monitor station began to operate in the
area (<uri>http://www.aqistudy.cn</uri>, last access: 15 April 2017), the reported
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration during the cold season has always exceeded
100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This situation indicates the necessity for
implementing appropriate particle emission reduction
measures. Gas pollutants have also been found to be abundant in JT due to the heavy
traffic. Average concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO were 146.93, 21.91, 29.68 ppb and 2.21 ppm,
respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seemed to be an issue in the port, showing
a high maximum hourly concentration of 692.6 ppb during the campaign,
whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached a maximum of 165.5 ppb. Peak levels of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were mainly linked with ship
activities, as the measurement site was very close to the channel and the
berths. A lower level of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed in JT compared with
Yangshan Port in Shanghai (Zhao et al., 2013), and a clear diurnal cycle of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was noted: the concentration rise at daytime (29.18 ppb) and
fell at night (16.38 ppb). The combined influence of coastal meteorology was
responsible for this cycle to some degree. During daytime, photochemical
reactions and transportation of ozone-rich air increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
whereas the reaction with NO and dry deposition destroy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
night. Research has shown that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be totally destroyed if the
NO source is large enough (Finlayson-Pitts and Pitts, 2000), and as our study
site was located in a busy port, our data verify this finding (e.g., the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was approximately 0 ppb at 21:00 LST on
4 January 2017). Peaks of CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coexisted to some
degree, but overall there was no evident pattern for CO due to complex local
combustion emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e4515">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level reduced notably with the maximum hourly concentration
dropping from 165.5 ppb before 1 January 2017 to 67.4 ppb after this date,
with similar vessel activity. The variation in Fig. 4 confirms this distinct
reduction in JT. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited a prompt drop from 77 to 20 ppb on
30 December 2016 compared with the high and steady concentration at XL (the
control group from upwind of JT). This <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction was mainly
attributed to local sources, as JT was under the influence of the prevailing
atmospheric conditions from XL via diffusion and transmission
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> covaried at both sites), where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> displayed little change. More precisely, the reduction was most
likely a direct response to fuel switching, compared with all of the other
variables at port. The wind map shows that the reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
even more notable in almost every wind direction that blew from the navigational
channel of JT to our observational site (Fig. 5). As shown in Fig. 1c, a
westerly wind blew through the third pool, and a northeasterly wind blew
through the second pool, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration dropped
significantly in both directions. On the contrary, in the southwest
direction, where wind blew from the city and road, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> barely
changed, indicating steady non-marine anthropogenic emissions. From this
perspective, fuel switching in JT indeed resulted in a reduction in the
ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of around 70 %.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4629"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in
Jingtang Harbor (JT) and at Xinli Primary School (XL).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/4899/2019/acp-19-4899-2019-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Carbonaceous and ionic species affected by marine vessels</title>
      <p id="d1e4676">Variations in carbonaceous and ionic species are depicted in Fig. 6. The mean
(range of) concentrations of carbonaceous species determined in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
6.52 (5.46–7.69) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for EC, and 23.10
(9.88–41.60) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for OC (OC levels are uncorrected for
artifacts from absorption/volatilization of gaseous organic species). The levels
of EC and OC were fairly consistent with that of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> collected during the
same period in Beijing (X. Li et al., 2018). EC is considered to be a tracer
for primary emissions (incomplete combustion), from sources such as ships,
vehicles and power plants in our study, which are affected by fuel quality and
combustion. However, little variation was observed after fuel switching in
this study due to the complicated contributors in the study are (JT). On<?pagebreak page4907?> the contrary, OC concentrations
were much higher with large variation, showing the clear prevalence of organic
carbonaceous species over EC. However, no discernible effect of fuel switching
was found on OC concentrations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4740">Distribution of differences in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration by
wind direction before and after 30 December 2016 in Jingtang Harbor.
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">△</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after
30 December 2016–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before 30 December 2016).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/4899/2019/acp-19-4899-2019-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4799">As the major long-range transported aerosol components, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominated the ionic species,
with an average concentration of 22.04, 25.95
and 13.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and strong
correlations with one another. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are major constituents of sea salt and
mineral dust, with an average concentration of 1.10, 0.21, 0.84, 2.10 and
3.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Fig. 6). Port-related
emissions have been proven to be one of the major sources of local emission in
JT. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was relatively abundant, as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in the
aerosol was 4.79, which is much larger than the ratio in the sea salt (1.8), indicating other
strong anthropogenic sources such as coal combustion (Yao
et al., 2002) and biomass burning (Li et al., 2007, 2009).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as an indicator of mineral dust, was higher than that observed in the city
area of Tangshan (0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which was considered to be
related to port activities (load and unload bulk materials). Moreover,
the mass ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.27) was higher than the value of
0.12 reported for sea<?pagebreak page4908?> water, suggesting additional magnesium sources such as
soil dust containing dolomite, which may also be related to port activities.
To evaluate the contribution of stationary emissions and mobile
emissions to air pollution (Gao et al., 2011), the mean mass
ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in JT was calculated; the result
(1.19) was higher than that of that of the city area of Tangshan (0.7),
indicating that JT was more affected by mobile sources than city area.</p>
      <p id="d1e5062">The high humidity in JT promotes secondary aerosol formation from local
emissions (Yu et al., 2018). As the chemical composition of atmospheric particulate matter is largely
affected by prevailing weather conditions, the samples were categorized as
“polluted days” or “clean days” based on the corresponding
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration for comparison (Röösli et
al., 2001). The proportion of sulfates and nitrates rose
from 55 % on clean days to 70 % on polluted days, showing a large concentration of secondary
aerosols either due to transportation or formation. Generally, the SORs and NORs in
JT were higher than those of city areas of Tangshan and Beijing (Fig. 7), and
increased significantly from clean days (0.14 and 0.10, respectively) to polluted days (0.48 and
0.37, respectively), suggesting a strong localized photochemical redox
reaction. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio can be used as an indicator of the extent of
the formation of secondary organic aerosols (Cabada et al.,
2004). Despite the fact that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission ratio is dependent on both fuel type and
engine type, tests show that it is still able to be utilized to distinguish between marine
combustion sources (ratios typically over 10) (Celo et al., 2015; Moldanová et al.,
2009; Sippula et al., 2014) and on-road diesel engines (ratios typically ranging
from 0.25 to 1) (Oanh et al., 2010). In this study, the mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio was 3.58, which is much higher than that of the Port of Thessaloniki in Greece
(Tolis et al., 2015) and a port in Hong Kong (Gao et al.,
2016), which indicates a higher influence from ship emissions in JT. Therefore,
the localized photochemical reactions and aerosol formation driven by ship
emissions contribute remarkably to air pollution in JT. This sheds
light on the fact that secondary pollution
should be treated via the reduction of local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions as part of pollution control in this harbor, which may be
achieved by reducing ship emissions by fuel switching.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5123">Variation of <bold>(a)</bold> carbonaceous species and
<bold>(b)</bold> ionic species in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/4899/2019/acp-19-4899-2019-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e5149">Sulfur oxidation rate (SOR) and the nitrogen oxidation rate (NOR) of
particles collected in this study and in the city areas of Tangshan (Zhang et al., 2017)
and Beijing (X. Li et al., 2018).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/4899/2019/acp-19-4899-2019-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e5160">Enrichment factor of elements in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Jingtang Harbor. The
classes corresponding to the IAQI level standards computed from the
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration during the sampling period. The mean, minimum and
maximum concentrations of each element are also illustrated.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/4899/2019/acp-19-4899-2019-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Elemental enrichment factors and marker for ship emissions</title>
      <?pagebreak page4909?><p id="d1e5195">The ranges and mean concentrations of all measured elements are shown in
Fig. 8. Overall, the mass concentrations of Al, Ti, Mg, Fe, Na, K, Mn, V,
Ni, Zn and Pb were abundant and they varied largely with the sample time.
Samples were categorized into three batches based on the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> limit of
Chinese IAQI level standard (HJ 633-2012) during sampling, considering the influences of
ambient pollution on particulate chemical composition. One specific
sample 2017/01/04 was set as a background/control group due to no ship
activity during its sampling time (according to the ship traffic
information provided), and intra-batch comparison was then performed to estimate the
variations in elements after fuel switching.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e5209"><bold>(a)</bold> Daily trajectories of air masses arriving at Jingtang
Harbor during the sampling period, with starting dates listed next to the
pathways. Sample 2017/01/04 is marked as a “special day” due to the absence
of ship activity during its sampling period. <bold>(b)</bold> The concentration
of V in the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of each sample, clustered by origin and airflow type.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/4899/2019/acp-19-4899-2019-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5232">The enrichment factor (EF) was used to normalize the observed concentrations
of elements and to evaluate the influences of crustal and anthropogenic
sources. Generally, elements from Ca to K in Fig. 8 are mainly from
geological sources and are thus classified as “crustal elements”. Ca was
mostly from stable crustal sources which had the lowest EF values. With EF
values around 10, and no evident temporal variation, the elements from Ti to
U in Fig. 8 may have a major local crustal origin such as dust. Regression
analysis comparing the EF values of Na and K revealed a strong correlation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.994), implying a primarily marine source. Conversely, Co,
Mn and V were moderately enriched (EF &lt; 100) and the elements from
Ni to Se in Fig. 8 were highly enriched (EF &gt; 100) due to the
contribution of anthropogenic sources, and were all classified as “pollution
elements”. Co, Mn, Cu and Zn may have originated from the various bulk
materials carried within the harbor area (Almeida et al., 2012; Moreno
et al., 2007). With EF values that are strongly correlated with one another,
Mn, TI, Cu, As, Sn, Zn, Pb, Hg and Ag would likely have a same major
anthropogenic source, which is thought to be traffic pollution. According to
tunnel studies (Lawrence et al., 2013; F. H. Li et al., 2018) and in situ
measurements (Terzi et al., 2010; Thorpe and Harrison, 2008), Mn, Cu, Sn, Zn
and Pb in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are related to vehicle emissions as well as tire and
brake wear. Weckwerth (2001) reported As enrichment in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the
shaking of rusting rails due to passing trains; this would explain our
observations, as our measurement site is in the vicinity of the train rails
around the first pool. With respect to Mo and Cd, there were not enough
values to present patterns, although the literature shows that Mo may be a
contribution from diesel exhaust and brake wear (Weckwerth, 2001), whereas Cd
may stem from motor vehicle emissions (F. H. Li et al., 2018). Again, this
proved that JT was more affected by mobile sources, from which heavy metals
generally originate.</p>
      <p id="d1e5265">The establishment of a marker to deduce variations in ship emissions is
crucial. There has been a particular focus on Ni and V in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, as several
recent studies have clearly revealed that V and Ni are representative of ship
exhaust particles using an aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Ault et
al., 2010; Healy et al., 2009); furthermore, higher V levels in ship
emissions have been found to be associated with residual fuel combustion
instead of distillate fuel (Agrawal et al., 2008; Celo et al., 2015). In JT,
V and Ni were considered to mainly originate from anthropogenic sources,
whereas they were considered to be crustal elements in the city area of
Tangshan. This indicated a unique contributor in JT, which was clearly ships
consuming residual fuel. However in this study, Ni was proven to be less
credible as a residual fuel marker, as the concentration of Ni was even
inconsistent between parallel samples collected on the same day. On the
contrary, the concentration of V, which showed significant intra-batch
decreases in all three pollution levels, proved to be highly related to fuel
switching; hence, V was identified as the perfect marker for residual fuel
emissions in JT.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4910?><p id="d1e5277">The chemical composition of MDOs/MGOs indicates that V is below the detection limit,
but PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples presented the existence of V after fuel switching.
This suggests that regionally transmitted V should not be overlooked. According to
back trajectories, during the sampling period of sample 2017/01/04, when no ship activity existed,
the air mass in control group moved into the Bohai Bay, before turning back to
JT. This air mass was able to bring in particles containing a large amount of V
from ships cruising in the sea that could still legally use IFO, verifying the
influence of air transportation on particle content (Fig. 9). As this
pathway would effectively influence the content of air mass, other
trajectories were clustered into three typical types based on the transport
pathways of air masses, each representing continental dominant, marine
dominant and mixed airflows (which are plotted in Fig. 9). The V concentration after fuel
switching was 17.4 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under coastal airflows (marine
and mixing airflow together), which is much higher than 9.0 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
under continental airflows, indicating the significant effect of ship
emissions on coastal areas. As shown in Fig. 9, samples that shared similar
transport patterns from Mongolia–Inner Mongolia were compared to rule
out the portion of transmitted V. The results showed that ships had switched fuel in
advance and, most importantly,  that the implementation of low-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel reduced
V from ships by 97.1 %, from 309.9 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> before fuel
switching to 9.1 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after its implementation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{\Delta NO_{\mathit{x}}/\Delta SO_{{2}}}$} ratios and the fuel type
indicated in ship plumes}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and the fuel type
indicated in ship plumes</title>
      <p id="d1e5378">In this study, ship plume events were used for the surveillance of emissions
and the fuel types utilized by passing ships (see Sect. 2.3). In total, 16 ship
plume events were measured during this campaign, for which the molar
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios fell into the range of
0.92–17.89 (Table 1). The accuracy of the molar ratios were justified by
proving that losses of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the plumes during the
transit time to the instrument were small. Potential losses of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
include photolysis during the daytime (Makkonen et al., 2012);
conversion to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and subsequently <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at night
(McLaren et al., 2010); and the heterogeneous conversion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to HONO on the aqueous surface of the ocean (Wojtal et al., 2011).
The furthest berth in the prevailing direction was 1.5 km from the
measurement site, indicating a maximum plume transport time of 9 min at a
wind speed of 2.7 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Using this transport time and a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime of 3.7 h measured in ship plumes (Beirle et al.,
2004), we concluded a maximum potential loss of 4 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, the loss
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was attributed to heterogeneous reactions to form particle
sulfate with equivalent lifetimes, which counteract the potential for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions to bias the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios. Therefore, the maximum error in our measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios due to such loss processes is estimated
to be &lt; 4 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e5587">Previous inventories, measurements and ship plume studies have proven a
direct correlation between S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molar emission ratios, which aids with the
determination of a critical point in this work. For high-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fuels (2.43 %), several emission inventories for Bohai Bay indicated that the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission ratio was
between 1.8 and 2.0 (Liu et al., 2016; Song, 2015; Xing et al., 2016),
compared with the ratio of 2.6 observed from residual fuel plumes
(Ault et al., 2010). For 0.5 % S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fuels in comparison, the inventory
indicated 10.51 (Liu et al., 2016), which was<?pagebreak page4911?> also comparable with the
ratio of 11.6 observed from distillate fuel plumes (Ault et al.,
2010). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission ratio rises
as the S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value decreases, but it is also affected by the ship
engine model, the load, the operation conditions and the combustion conditions in
practical situations (McLaren et al., 2012). Thus, the variability
in the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios were expected, even when ships consumed the same type of fuel.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e5705">Molar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of all 16 ship plumes. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents the date with the positive area referring to the time
after 1 January 2017. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio with the positive area referring to the
S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.5 % in fuel.
Plumes indicating high-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and low-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel are distinguished using different symbols</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/4899/2019/acp-19-4899-2019-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5793">Considering all of the abovementioned aspects, we concluded that a ratio over
7.5 was a suggestion of fuel with a S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value below 0.5 %;
therefore, ratios under 7.5 suggested high and incompliant S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values, as shown using the areas divided by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis in
Fig. 10. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis in Fig. 10 represents the beginning of the ship fuel regulation
within the three DECAs in the implementation plan. The axes make up four
quadrants, each representing different scenarios. The ratios in first
quadrant indicate the compliance of ship to the regulation, and most of the
ratios were higher than 10.51 – implying that the S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value was
much lower than 0.5 %. Above the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, ratios in the second
quadrant also indicate compliance, in addition to the action of advance
fuel switching before the implementation date. Ratios in the third quadrant
(plume numbers 1-5) had an average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio of 1.92, which conforms to the emission ratio in inventory (1.82 and
2.0) before the DECA implementation. Ratios in the fourth quadrant indicate
the usage of high-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel. As shown in Fig. 10, most of plumes
indicate compliance with the 0.5 % S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> limit, although some
high-sulfur plumes still occurred. In these cases, precise identification of
the high-sulfur plume contributors and the reinforcement of supervision are
indeed necessary. Generally, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction of the average
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio was 75 % from high-sulfur
plumes (3.26) to low-sulfur plumes (12.97), which is consistent with the
S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction (79 %) and the reduction of gas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the ambient air (70 %, in Sect. 3.1.1); this proves the practicability of
this method. One uncertain factor with respect to this method is the
difficulty involved in identifying hybrid fuels that have a S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
value of around 0.5 %. For S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values around 0.5 %, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission ratio was observed to be either way
below or consistent with the inventory estimate (around 6 in Winnes et al.,
2016; around 11 in Zetterdahl et al., 2016), which may be attributed to the
diversity of blending IFOs and MDOs. In this way, ships using hybrid fuels
were unable to be identified, and some could be mistaken as incompliance.
Further research is required on this subject.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Compliance based on the plumes</title>
      <p id="d1e5983">Test showed that the three ships we sampled from in 14 January 2017 burned MDOs
(Table 2), which was in conformity with the implementation of the fuel
regulation in JT. There would be obvious benefits such as significant
improvements in emissions and air quality once all vessels comply and
switch to MDOs or other alternative distillate fuels. Nevertheless, to enforce this,
it is crucial to ensure the compliance of ships, which requires a
more convenient and timely method of indicating fuel quality which does not involve
analyzing fuel samples.</p>
      <p id="d1e5986">After identifying low-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (compliant) and high-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (potential
incompliant) ship plumes, we matched each of the plumes with certain vessels using the
ship traffic information, which contains a series of arrival and departure
logs to help estimate the time when different ships passed the sampling
site. Using the plume conditions, wind directions and ship traffic
information to trace the specific source of measured plumes, we noted that
most plumes were likely linked to several different ships because the wind often blew
through the busy pools and navigational channel where many ships were
manoeuvring and berthed. For the high-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plume number 9, five ships were in
berth in the upwind direction and two ships were passing by during the plume
measurement period, which indicates a mixture of different individual plumes. A similar situation
was found for other high-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plumes: five ships were berthed and two were passing
by during plume number 10; five ships were berthed and five were passing by
during plume number 12; and four ships were berthed and four were passing by during plume number 14. In
these cases, to achieve a comprehensive and accurate surveillance of
the compliance of individual vessels, a more detailed and precise database of
vessel activity, such as AIS data, is needed.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page4912?><sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e6035">Field measurements were conducted at a measurement station in JT, including continued monitoring of meteorological conditions and gas
and particle concentrations, from 28 December 2016 to 15 January 2017.
Samples of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were collected every day from 28 December 2016 to 11 January 2017. Moreover, three fuel samples were taken from three respective vessels
berthed in JT on 14 January 2017. Profiles of meteorological
conditions and pollutants were obtained, in addition to the chemical characterization
of aerosol and fuel samples.</p>
      <p id="d1e6047">Pollutant profiles showed a heavy polluted environment in JT in wintertime.
On over 50 % of days, the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was above the Chinese
national ambient air quality standard class IV limit value (115 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
China national standard GB 3095-2012). The average
concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and CO were 146.93, 21.91, 29.68 ppb and 2.21 ppm, respectively,
among which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached a
maximum hourly concentration of 692.6 ppb and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached a
maximum hourly concentration of 165.5 ppb. Peak
levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were mainly linked with ship
activities, as the measurement site was very close to the channel and the berths, and a clear
diurnal cycle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was noted due to changes in photochemical
reactions and transportation. The mean (range of) concentrations of carbonaceous
species in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were 6.52 (5.46–7.69) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
EC, and 23.10 (9.88–41.60) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for OC.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominated the ionic
species, with an average concentration of 22.04, 25.95 and 13.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were major constituents of sea salt and mineral dust,
with an average concentration of 1.10, 0.21, 0.84, 2.10 and 3.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.
Enrichment factors of elements in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were used for the determination of a marker for residual fuel
emissions, which was V in this study. Analyses of carbonaceous and ionic
species revealed that local port-related emissions were one of the major
sources of pollution in JT, especially the mobile sources. High humidity in
port further exacerbated air pollution in the area by promoting localized
photochemical reaction and secondary aerosol formation from ship emissions.
Moreover, the effect of ship emissions were proven to be widespread because the
concentration of V, the identified marker for residual fuel emissions, was
much higher in coastal areas than continental areas.</p>
      <p id="d1e6372">After the implementation of low-sulfur fuel, fuel
samples were collected from three vessels and were all found to be compliant with the
fuel switching regulation. Based on previous studies and background at the measuring site,
ship plume events were identified to be convenient for the surveillance of fuel
quality. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of all 16 ship plumes
fell within the range of 0.92–17.89, where which a ratio over 7.5 was
identified as a suggestion of fuel with S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> below 0.5 %, whereas
values below 7.5 implied the use of fuel with a high and incompliant S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level.
After the fuel switching implementation date, four plumes indicated the
usage of high-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel. However, compliance was difficult to
conclude in these cases, and details and a precise database of the ships' locations would be required.
Generally, the reduction of the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio from high-sulfur plumes (3.26) to
low-sulfur plumes (12.97) shows a direct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reduction of 75 %, consistent with the S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction (79 %).</p>
      <p id="d1e6467">Despite the fact that carbonaceous species in particles were not significantly
influenced by fuel switching, the gas and particle pollutants in the ambient air
exhibited clear and effective improvements from the implementation of low-sulfur fuel.
A comparison with the prevailing atmospheric conditions suggest
a prompt 70 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction in ambient air after 30 December 2016, which further analysis concluded to be a result of the reduction of local
marine vessel sources. Given the high humidity at the site, this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reduction due to fuel switching will potentially abate the amount of secondary aerosols
and improve the acidity of particulate matter in the region. As a marker for ship
emission, the V concentration dropped by 97.1 % from 309.9 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> before fuel switching to 9.1 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after,
indicating a significant reduction due to the implementation of low-sulfur
fuel.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6521">Data are available upon request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6527">YZ, FD, and HM contributed equally.
YZ primarily participated in the chemical analyses and wrote the article. FD
and HM mainly participated in the design and conducted the field
measurements, which was considered to be an equal contribution to this work.
MF helped design the experiments and was responsible for the pilot
preparations. ZL and QX helped conduct the field measurements. XJ and SL
contributed to setting instruments. KH provided constructive comments on this
research. HL conceived this study and provided guidance on the whole research
process as well revising the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6533">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6539">This article is part of the special issue “Shipping and the
Environment – From Regional to Global Perspectives (ACP/OS inter-journal
SI)”. It is a result of the Shipping and the Environment – From Regional to
Global Perspectives, Gothenburg, Sweden, 23–24 October 2017.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6545">This work was supported by the National Science Fund for Excellent Young
Scholars (grant no. 41822505), the National Natural Science Found of China
(grant nos. 91544110 and 41571447), Beijing Nova Program (grant
no. Z181100006218077), the National Key R&amp;D Program (grant
no. 2016YFC0201504), the Special Fund of State Key Joint Laboratory of
Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (grant
no. 16Y02ESPCT), the National<?pagebreak page4913?> Research Program for Key Issues in
Air Pollution Control (grant no. DQGG0201&amp;0207),  and the National
Program on Key Basic Research Project (grant no. 2014CB441301). We appreciate
that Hebei Sailhero Environmental Protection High-tech Co., Ltd. and
Guangzhou Hexin Instrument Co., Ltd. provided the instruments used for our
observations. We are also grateful for all of the help from the Sino-Japan
Friendship Centre for Environmental Protection and Sinopec Research Institute
of Petroleum Processing.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6550">This paper was edited by Markus Quante and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Agrawal, H., Welch, W. A., Miller, J. W., and Cocker, D. R.: Emission
measurements from a crude oil tanker at sea, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 7098–7103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703102y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es703102y</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Alföldy, B., Löv, J. B., Lagler, F., Mellqvist, J., Berg, N.,
Beecken, J., Weststrate, H., Duyzer, J., Bencs, L., Horemans, B., Cavalli,
F., Putaud, J.-P., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Csordás, A. P., Van Grieken,
R., Borowiak, A., and Hjorth, J.: Measurements of air pollution emission
factors for marine transportation in SECA, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1777–1791,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1777-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-1777-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Almeida, S. M., Silva, A. V., Freitas, M. C., Marques, A. M., Ramos, C. A.,
Silva, A. I., and Pinheiro, T.: Characterization of dust material emitted
during harbour activities by k(0)-INAA and PIXE, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch.,
291, 77–82, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1279-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10967-011-1279-4</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Ault, A. P., Gaston, C. J., Wang, Y., Dominguez, G., Thiemens, M. H., and
Prather, K. A.: Characterization of the Single Particle Mixing State of
Individual Ship Plume Events Measured at the Port of Los Angeles, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 44, 1954–1961, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es902985h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es902985h</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Balzani Löv, J. M., Alfoldy, B., Gast, L. F. L., Hjorth, J., Lagler, F.,
Mellqvist, J., Beecken, J., Berg, N., Duyzer, J., Westrate, H., Swart, D. P.
J., Berkhout, A. J. C., Jalkanen, J.-P., Prata, A. J., van der Hoff, G. R.,
and Borowiak, A.: Field test of available methods to measure remotely
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from ships, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 7, 2597–2613, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2597-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-2597-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Beirle, S., Platt, U., von Glasow, R., Wenig, M., and Wagner, T.: Estimate of
nitrogen oxide emissions from shipping by satellite remote sensing, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 31, L18102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020312" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004gl020312</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bengtsson, S., Andersson, K., and Fridell, E.: A comparative life cycle
assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas and three other fossil
fuels, P. I. Mech. Eng. M.-J. Eng., 225, 97–110,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090211402136" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1177/1475090211402136</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cabada, J. C., Pandis, S. N., Subramanian, R., Robinson, A. L., Polidori, A.,
and Turpin, B.: Estimating the secondary organic aerosol contribution to
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using the EC tracer method, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 38, 140–155,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820390229084" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820390229084</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Campling, P., Janssen, L., Vanherle, K., Cofala, J., Heyes, C., and Sander,
R.: Final Report: Specific evaluation of emissions from shipping including
assessment for the establishment of possible new emission control areas in
European Seas, The Flemish Institute for Technological Research NV, Belgium,
74 pp., available at: <uri>http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/Main Report Shipping.pdf</uri>
(last access: 6 April 2017), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>CARB: Final regulation order, fuel sulfur and other operational requirements
for ocean-going vessels within California waters and 24 nautical miles of the
California baseline, Board, C. A. R., available at: <uri>https://www.arb.ca.gov/ports/marinevess/documents/fuelogv13.pdf</uri>
(last access: 1 February 2019),  2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Celo, V., Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E., and McCurdy, M.: Chemical Characterization
of Exhaust Emissions from Selected Canadian Marine Vessels: The Case of Trace
Metals and Lanthanoids, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 5220–5226,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b00127</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Contini, D., Gambaro, A., Donateo, A., Cescon, P., Cesari, D., Merico, E.,
Belosi, F., and Citron, M.: Inter-annual trend of the primary contribution of
ship emissions to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Venice (Italy): Efficiency of
emissions mitigation strategies, Atmos. Environ., 102, 183–190,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.065</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Cooper, D. A.: Exhaust emissions from ships at berth, Atmos. Environ., 37,
3817–3830, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00446-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00446-1</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cooper, D. and Gustafsson, T.: Methodology for calculating emissions from
ships: 1. Update of emission factors, Swedish Environment Research
Institute, Norrköping, Sweden,
available: <uri>http://www.smed.se/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/SMED_Report_2004_4.pdf</uri> (last access: 6 February 2019), 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Corbett, J. J., Winebrake, J. J., Green, E. H., Kasibhatla, P., Eyring, V.,
and Lauer, A.: Mortality from ship emissions: A global assessment, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 41, 8512–8518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es071686z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es071686z</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Endresen, O., Sorgard, E., Sundet, J. K., Dalsoren, S. B., Isaksen, I. S. A.,
Berglen, T. F., and Gravir, G.: Emission from international sea
transportation and environmental impact, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
108, 17,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002898" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd002898</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Eyring, V., Kohler, H. W., van Aardenne, J., and Lauer, A.: Emissions from
international shipping: 1. The last 50 years, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
110, D17305, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005619" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd005619</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Eyring, V., Isaksen, I. S. A., Berntsen, T., Collins, W. J., Corbett, J. J.,
Endresen, O., Grainger, R. G., Moldanova, J., Schlager, H., and Stevenson, D.
S.: Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Shipping, Atmos. Environ.,
44, 4735–4771, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.059</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. and Pitts, J. N.: Chemistry of the upper and lower
atmosphere: theory, experiments and applications, Academic
Press, San Diego, USA,  2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Fridell, E., Steen, E., and Peterson, K.: Primary particles in ship
emissions, Atmos. Environ., 42, 1160–1168,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.042</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, Q., Shen, Y., and Zhang, J.: On the ship pollutant emission inventory in
Shanghai port, J. Safety Environ., 12, 57–64, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4914?><ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Gao, X. M., Yang, L. X., Cheng, S. H., Gao, R., Zhou, Y., Xue, L. K., Shou,
Y. P., Wang, J., Wang, X. F., Nie, W., Xu, P. J., and Wang, W. X.:
Semi-continuous measurement of water-soluble ions in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Jinan,
China: Temporal variations and source apportionments, Atmos. Environ., 45,
6048–6056, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.041</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Y., Lee, S. C., Huang, Y., Chow, J. C., and Watson, J. G.: Chemical
characterization and source apportionment of size-resolved particles in Hong
Kong sub-urban area, Atmos. Res., 170, 112–122,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.015</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Gariazzo, C., Papaleo, V., Pelliccioni, A., Calori, G., Radice, P., and
Tinarelli, G.: Application of a Lagrangian particle model to assess the
impact of harbour, industrial and urban activities on air quality in the
Taranto area, Italy, Atmos. Environ., 41, 6432–6444,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.005</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hassellöv, I.-M., Turner, R. D., Lauer, A., and Corbett, J.: Shipping
contributes to ocean acidification, 40, 2731–2736, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50521</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Healy, R. M., O'Connor, I. P., Hellebust, S., Allanic, A., Sodeau, J. R., and
Wenger, J. C.: Characterisation of single particles from in-port ship
emissions, Atmos. Environ., 43, 6408–6414,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.039</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
HKEPD: 2012 Hong Kong Emission Inventory Report, Hong Kong Environmental
Protection DepartmentEPD/TR X/14, 26, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
IMO: Revised MARPOL Annex IV, Organization, I. M., 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
IMO: Third IMO GHG Study 2014, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Jalkanen, J.-P., Brink, A., Kalli, J., Pettersson, H., Kukkonen, J., and
Stipa, T.: A modelling system for the exhaust emissions of marine traffic and
its application in the Baltic Sea area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9209–9223,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9209-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-9209-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Jalkanen, J. P., Johansson, L., and Kukkonen, J.: A comprehensive inventory
of the ship traffic exhaust emissions in the Baltic Sea from 2006 to 2009,
Ambio, 43, 311–324, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0389-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13280-013-0389-3</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Jalkanen, J.-P., Johansson, L., and Kukkonen, J.: A comprehensive inventory
of ship traffic exhaust emissions in the European sea areas in 2011, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 71–84, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-71-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-71-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kattner, L., Mathieu-Üffing, B., Burrows, J. P., Richter, A., Schmolke,
S., Seyler, A., and Wittrock, F.: Monitoring compliance with sulfur content
regulations of shipping fuel by in situ measurements of ship emissions,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10087–10092,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10087-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10087-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Khoder, M. I.: Atmospheric conversion of sulfur dioxide to particulate
sulfate and nitrogen dioxide to particulate nitrate and gaseous nitric acid
in an urban area, Chemosphere, 49, 675–684,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00391-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00391-0</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Kweon, C. B., Okada, S., Stetter, J. C., Christenson, C. G., Shafer, M. M.,
Schauer, J. J., and Foster, D. E.: Effect of Fuel Composition on Combustion and Detailed Chemical/Physical Characteristics of Diesel Exhaust, 112, 1668–1687, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-1899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4271/2003-01-1899</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A., Cappa, C. D., Langridge, J., Bahreini, R., Buffaloe, G., Brock,
C., Cerully, K., Coffman, D., Hayden, K., Holloway, J., Lerner, B., Massoli,
P., Li, S.-M., McLaren, R., Middlebrook, A. M., Moore, R., Nenes, A.,
Nuaaman, I., Onasch, T. B., Peischl, J., Perring, A., Quinn, P. K., Ryerson,
T., Schwartz, J. P., Spackman, R., Wofsy, S. C., Worsnop, D., Xiang, B., and
Williams, E.: Impact of Fuel Quality Regulation and Speed Reductions on
Shipping Emissions: Implications for Climate and Air Quality, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 45, 9052–9060, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es2013424" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es2013424</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Lai, H. K., Tsang, H., Chau, J., Lee, C. H., McGhee, S. M., Hedley, A. J.,
and Wong, C. M.: Health impact assessment of marine emissions in Pearl River
Delta region, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 66, 158–163,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.09.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.09.029</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Lake, D. A., Tolocka, M. P., Johnston, M. V., and Wexler, A. S.: The
character of single particle sulfate in Baltimore, Atmos. Environ., 38,
5311–5320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.067</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lauer, A., Eyring, V., Hendricks, J., Jöckel, P., and Lohmann, U.: Global
model simulations of the impact of ocean-going ships on aerosols, clouds, and
the radiation budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5061–5079,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5061-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5061-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence, S., Sokhi, R., Ravindra, K., Mao, H., Prain, H. D., and Bull, I.
D.: Source apportionment of traffic emissions of particulate matter using
tunnel measurements, Atmos. Environ., 77, 548–557,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.040</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Lee, R., Pedley, J., and Hobbs, C.: Fuel Quality Impact on Heavy Duty Diesel
Emissions: A Literature Review, SAE Transactions, 107, 1952–1970,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4271/982649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4271/982649</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Li, C., Yuan, Z., Ou, J., Fan, X., Ye, S., Xiao, T., Shi, Y., Huang, Z., Ng,
S. K. W., Zhong, Z., and Zheng, J.: An AIS-based high-resolution ship
emission inventory and its uncertainty in Pearl River Delta region, China,
Sci. Total Environ., 573, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.219" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.219</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Li, F. H., Zhang, Y. J., Zhang, J., Yuan, Y., Wu, L., and Mao, H. J.:
Characteristics of Particulate and Inorganic Elements of Motor Vehicles Based
on a Tunnel Environment, Huanjing Kexue, 39, 1014–1022,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201706226" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13227/j.hjkx.201706226</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Li, X., Li, S., Xiong, Q., Yang, X., Qi, M., Zhao, W., and Wang, X.:
Characteristics of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Chemical Compositions and Their Effect on
Atmospheric Visibility in Urban Beijing, China during the Heating Season,
Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 15, 1924, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091924" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/ijerph15091924</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Li, X. H., Wang, S. X., Duan, L., Hao, J. M., Li, C., Chen, Y. S., and Yang,
L.: Particulate and trace gas emissions from open burning of wheat straw and
corn stover in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6052–6058,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0705137" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0705137</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Li, X. H., Wang, S. X., Duan, L., Hao, J. M., and Nie, Y. F.: Carbonaceous
Aerosol Emissions from Household Biofuel Combustion in China, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 43, 6076–6081, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803330j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es803330j</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Liu, H., Fu, M. L., Jin, X. X., Shang, Y., Shindell, D., Faluvegi, G.,
Shindell, C., and He, K. B.: Health and climate impacts of ocean-going
vessels in East Asia, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 1037–1041, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3083" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate3083</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Lu, G., Brook, J. R., Alfarra, M. R., Anlauf, K., Leaitch, W. R., Sharma, S.,
Wang, D., Worsnop, D. R., and Phinney, L.: Identification and
characterization of inland ship plumes over Vancouver, BC, Atmos. Environ.,
40, 2767–2782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.054</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Lv, Z., Liu, H., Ying, Q., Fu, M., Meng, Z., Wang, Y., Wei, W., Gong, H., and
He, K.: Impacts of shipping emissions on PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution in China,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15811–15824,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15811-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-15811-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Makkonen, U., Virkkula, A., Mäntykenttä, J., Hakola, H., Keronen, P.,
Vakkari, V., and Aalto, P. P.: Semi-continuous gas<?pagebreak page4915?> and inorganic aerosol
measurements at a Finnish urban site: comparisons with filters, nitrogen in
aerosol and gas phases, and aerosol acidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
5617–5631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5617-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5617-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Matthias, V., Bewersdorff, I., Aulinger, A., and Quante, M.: The contribution
of ship emissions to air pollution in the North Sea regions, Environ.
Pollut., 158, 2241–2250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.013</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>McLaren, R., Wojtal, P., Majonis, D., McCourt, J., Halla, J. D., and Brook,
J.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical measurements in a polluted marine environment:
links to ozone formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4187–4206,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4187-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4187-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>McLaren, R., Wojtal, P., Halla, J. D., Mihele, C., and Brook, J. R.: A survey
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission ratios measured in marine vessel plumes in
the Strait of Georgia, Atmos. Environ., 46, 655–658,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.044</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Moldanová, J., Fridell, E., Popovicheva, O., Demirdjian, B., Tishkova,
V., Faccinetto, A., and Focsa, C.: Characterisation of particulate matter and
gaseous emissions from a large ship diesel engine, Atmos. Environ., 43,
2632–2641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.008</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Moreno, N., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Artinano, B., Guerra, A., Luaces, J.
A., Lorente, A., and Basora, J.: Characterisation of dust material emitted
during harbour operations (HADA Project), Atmos. Environ., 41, 6331–6343,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.028</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
MOT: Implementation of the Ship Emission Control Area in Pearl River Delta,
the Yangtze River Delta and the Bohai Rim (Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei area),
Ministry of Transport, C., No. 11, Jianguomen Inner Street, Beijing, China, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>NOAA: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory),
available at: <uri>https://www.arl.noaa.gov/hysplit/hysplit/</uri> (last access: 4 May 2017), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Oanh, N. T. K., Thiansathit, W., Bond, T. C., Subramanian, R., Winijkul, E.,
and Paw-armart, I.: Compositional characterization of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted from
in-use diesel vehicles, Atmos. Environ., 44, 15–22,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.005</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Ohta, S. and Okita, T.: A chemical characterization of atmospheric aerosol in
Sapporo, Atmos. Environ., 24, 815–822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90282-r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0960-1686(90)90282-r</ext-link>,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Ostro, B.: Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in two southern
California counties, Environ. Res., 70, 98–104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1995.1053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1006/enrs.1995.1053</ext-link>,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Weingartner, E., Hasselbach, I., Lauer, P., Kurok, C., and
Fleischer, F.: Physical Properties, Chemical Composition, and Cloud Forming
Potential of Particulate Emissions from a Marine Diesel Engine at Various
Load Conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 3800–3805,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es903681z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es903681z</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Press, C. P.: China Port Yearbook 2017, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Röösli, M., Theis, G., Künzli, N., Staehelin, J., Mathys, P.,
Oglesby, L., Camenzind, M., and Braun-Fahrlander, C.: Temporal and spatial
variation of the chemical composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at urban and rural sites
in the Basel area, Switzerland, Atmos. Environ., 35, 3701–3713,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00511-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00511-2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Sinha, P., Hobbs, P. V., Yokelson, R. J., Christian, T. J., Kirchstetter, T.
W., and Bruintjes, R.: Emissions of trace gases and particles from two ships
in the southern Atlantic Ocean, Atmos. Environ., 37, 2139–2148,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00080-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00080-3</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Sippula, O., Stengel, B., Sklorz, M., Streibel, T., Rabe, R., Orasche, J.,
Lintelmann, J., Michalke, B., Abbaszade, G., Radischat, C., Groeger, T.,
Schnelle-Kreis, J., Harndorf, H., and Zimmermann, R.: Particle Emissions from
a Marine Engine: Chemical Composition and Aromatic Emission Profiles under
Various Operating Conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11721–11729,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502484z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es502484z</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Song, Y. N.: Research of emission inventory and emission character of inland
and offshore ships, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Stips, A., Bolding, K., Macías, D., Bruggeman, J., and Eayrs, C.:
Scoping report on the potential impact of on-board desulphurisation on the
water quality in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Emission Control, European Commission, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2788/336630" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2788/336630</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Tao, L., Fairley, D., Kleeman, M. J., and Harley, R. A.: Effects of Switching
to Lower Sulfur Marine Fuel Oil on Air Quality in the San Francisco Bay Area,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 10171–10178, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es401049x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es401049x</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Terzi, E., Argyropoulos, G., Bougatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., Nikolaou, K.,
and Samara, C.: Chemical composition and mass closure of ambient PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
urban sites, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2231–2239,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.019</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Thorpe, A. and Harrison, R. M.: Sources and properties of non-exhaust
particulate matter from road traffic: A review, Sci. Total Environ., 400,
270–282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.007</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Tolis, E. I., Saraga, D. E., Filiou, K. F., Tziavos, N. I., Tsiaousis, C. P.,
Dinas, A., and Bartzis, J. G.: One-year intensive characterization on
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> nearby port area of Thessaloniki, Greece, Environ. Sci. Pollut.
Res., 22, 6812–6826, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3883-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-014-3883-7</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Tronstad Lund, M., Eyring, V., Fuglestvedt, J., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A.,
Lee, D., and Righi, M.: Global-Mean Temperature Change from Shipping toward
2050: Improved Representation of the Indirect Aerosol Effect in Simple
Climate Models, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 8868–8877,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301166e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es301166e</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Turner, D. R., Hassellöv, I.-M., Ytreberg, E., and Rutgersson, A.: Shipping
and the environment: Smokestack emissions, scrubbers and unregulated oceanic consequences, Elem. Sci. Anth., 5, 45, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.167</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Turner, D. R., Edman, M., Gallego Urrea, J., Claremar, B., Hassellöv,
I.-M., Omstedt, A., and Rutgersson, A.: The potential future
contribution of shipping to acidification of the Baltic Sea, AMBIO, 47, 368–378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0950-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13280-017-0950-6</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>UNCTAD: World seaborne trade by types of cargo and by group of economies, annual,
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, available at: <uri>https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=32363</uri>, last access: 5 March 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Viana, M., Hammingh, P., Colette, A., Querol, X., Degraeuwe, B., de Vlieger,
I., and van Aardenne, J.: Impact of maritime transport emissions on coastal
air quality in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 90, 96–105,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.046</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4916?><ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Viana, M., Fann, N., Tobias, A., Querol, X., Rojas-Rueda, D., Plaza, A.,
Aynos, G., Conde, J. A., Fernandez, L., and Fernandez, C.: Environmental and
Health Benefits from Designating the Marmara Sea and the Turkish Straits as
an Emission Control Area (ECA), Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 3304–3313,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5049946" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es5049946</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Zhuang, G. S., Tang, A. H., Yuan, H., Sun, Y. L., Chen, S. A., and
Zheng, A. H.: The ion chemistry and the source of PM2.5 aerosol in Beijing,
Atmos. Environ., 39, 3771–3784, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.013</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Weckwerth, G.: Verification of traffic emitted aerosol components in the
ambient air of Cologne (Germany), Atmos. Environ., 35, 5525–5536,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00234-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00234-5</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Wedepohl, K. H.: The composition of the continental-crust, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Acta, 59, 1217–1232, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Williams, E. J., Lerner, B. M., Murphy, P. C., Herndon, S. C., and Zahniser,
M. S.: Emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and HCHO from
commercial marine shipping during Texas Air Quality Study (TexAQS) 2006, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D21306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012094" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd012094</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Winebrake, J. J., Corbett, J. J., Green, E. H., Lauer, A., and Eyring, V.:
Mitigating the Health Impacts of Pollution from Oceangoing Shipping: An
Assessment of Low-Sulfur Fuel Mandates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43,
4776–4782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803224q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es803224q</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Winnes, H. and Fridell, E.: Emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and particles
from manoeuvring ships, Transport Res. D-Tr. E., 15, 204–211,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.02.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.trd.2010.02.003</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Winnes, H., Moldanova, J., Anderson, M., and Fridell, E.: On-board
measurements of particle emissions from marine engines using fuels with
different sulphur content, P. I. Mech. Eng. M-J. Eng., 230, 45–54,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090214530877" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1177/1475090214530877</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Wojtal, P., Halla, J. D., and McLaren, R.: Pseudo steady states of HONO
measured in the nocturnal marine boundary layer: a conceptual model for HONO
formation on aqueous surfaces, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3243–3261,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3243-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3243-2011</ext-link>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Xiao, Q., Li, M., Liu, H., Fu, M., Deng, F., Lv, Z., Man, H., Jin, X., Liu,
S., and He, K.: Characteristics of marine shipping emissions at berth:
profiles for particulate matter and volatile organic compounds, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 18, 9527–9545, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9527-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-9527-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Xing, H., Duan, S. L., Huang, L. Z., and Liu, Q. N.: AIS data-based
estimation of emissions from sea-going ships in Bohai Sea areas, China
Environ. Sci., 36, 953–960, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Yang, M., Bell, T. G., Hopkins, F. E., and Smyth, T. J.: Attribution of
atmospheric sulfur dioxide over the English Channel to dimethyl sulfide and
changing ship emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4771–4783,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4771-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4771-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Yao, X. H., Chan, C. K., Fang, M., Cadle, S., Chan, T., Mulawa, P., He, K.
B., and Ye, B. M.: The water-soluble ionic composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Shanghai and Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 36, 4223–4234,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00342-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00342-4</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Yu, T., Zhao, D., Song, X., and Zhu, T.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-initiated multiphase
oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6679–6689, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6679-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-6679-2018</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Zetterdahl, M., Moldanova, J., Pei, X., Pathak, R. K., and Demirdjian, B.:
Impact of the 0.1 % fuel sulfur content limit in SECA on particle and
gaseous emissions from marine vessels, Atmos. Environ., 145, 338–345,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.022</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Lang, J., Wen, W., Cheng, S., and Wang, G.: Pollution
Characteristics and Regional Transmission of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Tangshan, J.
Beijing Univ. Technol., 43, 1252–1262, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.11936/bjutxb2016090045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.11936/bjutxb2016090045</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, M. J., Zhang, Y., Ma, W. C., Fu, Q. Y., Yang, X., Li, C. L., Zhou, B.,
Yu, Q., and Chen, L. M.: Characteristics and ship traffic source
identification of air pollutants in China's largest port, Atmos. Environ.,
64, 277–286, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.007</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Compliance and port air quality features with respect to ship fuel switching regulation: a field observation campaign, SEISO-Bohai</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Since 1 January 2017, ships berthed at the core ports of three designated <q>domestic emission control
areas</q> (DECAs) in China should be using fuel with a sulfur content less than
or equal to 0.5&thinsp;%. In order to evaluate the impacts of fuel switching, a
measurement campaign (SEISO-Bohai) was conducted from 28 December 2016 to
15 January 2017 at Jingtang Harbor, an area within the seventh busiest port
in the world. This campaign included meteorological monitoring, pollutant
monitoring, aerosol sampling and fuel sampling. During the campaign, 16 ship
plumes were captured by the on-shore measurement site, and 4 plumes indicated
the usage of high-S<sub>F</sub> (S<sub>F</sub> refers to the sulfur content of marine fuels).
The average reduction of the mean ΔNO<sub><i>x</i></sub>∕ΔSO<sub>2</sub> ratio from high-sulfur
plumes (3.26) before 1 January to low-sulfur plumes (12.97) after 1 January
shows a direct SO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction of 75&thinsp;%, consistent with
the sulfur content reduction (79&thinsp;%). The average concentrations of
PM<sub>2.5</sub> (particulate matter with a diameter less than 2.5&thinsp;µm),
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub> and CO during
campaign were 147.85&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>,
146.93, 21.91, 29.68&thinsp;ppb and 2.21&thinsp;ppm, respectively, among
which NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> reached a maximum hourly concentration of 692.6&thinsp;ppb, and
SO<sub>2</sub> reached a maximum hourly concentration of 165.5&thinsp;ppb.
The mean concentrations of carbonaceous and dominant ionic
species in particles were 6.52 (EC – elemental carbon), 23.10 (OC – organic carbon), 22.04 (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>), 25.95
(NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) and 13.55 (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>)&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>.
Although the carbonaceous species in particles were not significantly
affected by fuel switching, the gas and particle pollutants in the ambient air
exhibited clear and effective improvements due to the implementation of low-sulfur
fuel. Comparison with the prevailing atmospheric conditions and a wind map of
SO<sub>2</sub> variation concluded a prompt SO<sub>2</sub> reduction of 70&thinsp;% in
ambient air after fuel switching. Given the high humidity at the study site, this
SO<sub>2</sub> reduction will abate the concentration of secondary aerosols and improve
the acidity of particulate matter. Based on the enrichment factors of elements in
PM<sub>2.5</sub>, vanadium was identified as a marker of residual fuel ship
emissions, decreasing significantly by 97.1&thinsp;% from 309.9&thinsp;ng&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup> before fuel switching to 9.1&thinsp;ng&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup> after regulation, which
indicated a crucial improvement due to the implementation of low-sulfur
fuels. Ship emissions were proven to be significantly influential both
directly and indirectly on the port environment and the coastal areas around Bohai
Bay, where the population density reaches over 650 people per square kilometer. The
results from this study report the positive impact of fuel
switching on the air quality in the study region and indicate
a new method for identifying the ship fuel type used by vessels in the area.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Agrawal, H., Welch, W. A., Miller, J. W., and Cocker, D. R.: Emission
measurements from a crude oil tanker at sea, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 7098–7103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703102y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es703102y</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alföldy, B., Löv, J. B., Lagler, F., Mellqvist, J., Berg, N.,
Beecken, J., Weststrate, H., Duyzer, J., Bencs, L., Horemans, B., Cavalli,
F., Putaud, J.-P., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Csordás, A. P., Van Grieken,
R., Borowiak, A., and Hjorth, J.: Measurements of air pollution emission
factors for marine transportation in SECA, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1777–1791,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1777-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1777-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Almeida, S. M., Silva, A. V., Freitas, M. C., Marques, A. M., Ramos, C. A.,
Silva, A. I., and Pinheiro, T.: Characterization of dust material emitted
during harbour activities by k(0)-INAA and PIXE, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch.,
291, 77–82, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1279-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1279-4</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Ault, A. P., Gaston, C. J., Wang, Y., Dominguez, G., Thiemens, M. H., and
Prather, K. A.: Characterization of the Single Particle Mixing State of
Individual Ship Plume Events Measured at the Port of Los Angeles, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 44, 1954–1961, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es902985h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es902985h</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Balzani Löv, J. M., Alfoldy, B., Gast, L. F. L., Hjorth, J., Lagler, F.,
Mellqvist, J., Beecken, J., Berg, N., Duyzer, J., Westrate, H., Swart, D. P.
J., Berkhout, A. J. C., Jalkanen, J.-P., Prata, A. J., van der Hoff, G. R.,
and Borowiak, A.: Field test of available methods to measure remotely
SO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions from ships, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 7, 2597–2613, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2597-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2597-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Beirle, S., Platt, U., von Glasow, R., Wenig, M., and Wagner, T.: Estimate of
nitrogen oxide emissions from shipping by satellite remote sensing, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 31, L18102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020312" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020312</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bengtsson, S., Andersson, K., and Fridell, E.: A comparative life cycle
assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas and three other fossil
fuels, P. I. Mech. Eng. M.-J. Eng., 225, 97–110,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090211402136" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090211402136</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cabada, J. C., Pandis, S. N., Subramanian, R., Robinson, A. L., Polidori, A.,
and Turpin, B.: Estimating the secondary organic aerosol contribution to
PM<sub>2.5</sub> using the EC tracer method, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 38, 140–155,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820390229084" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820390229084</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Campling, P., Janssen, L., Vanherle, K., Cofala, J., Heyes, C., and Sander,
R.: Final Report: Specific evaluation of emissions from shipping including
assessment for the establishment of possible new emission control areas in
European Seas, The Flemish Institute for Technological Research NV, Belgium,
74 pp., available at: <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/Main Report Shipping.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/Main Report Shipping.pdf</a>
(last access: 6 April 2017), 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
CARB: Final regulation order, fuel sulfur and other operational requirements
for ocean-going vessels within California waters and 24 nautical miles of the
California baseline, Board, C. A. R., available at: <a href="https://www.arb.ca.gov/ports/marinevess/documents/fuelogv13.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.arb.ca.gov/ports/marinevess/documents/fuelogv13.pdf</a>
(last access: 1 February 2019),  2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Celo, V., Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E., and McCurdy, M.: Chemical Characterization
of Exhaust Emissions from Selected Canadian Marine Vessels: The Case of Trace
Metals and Lanthanoids, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 5220–5226,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00127" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00127</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Contini, D., Gambaro, A., Donateo, A., Cescon, P., Cesari, D., Merico, E.,
Belosi, F., and Citron, M.: Inter-annual trend of the primary contribution of
ship emissions to PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in Venice (Italy): Efficiency of
emissions mitigation strategies, Atmos. Environ., 102, 183–190,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.065</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Cooper, D. A.: Exhaust emissions from ships at berth, Atmos. Environ., 37,
3817–3830, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00446-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00446-1</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cooper, D. and Gustafsson, T.: Methodology for calculating emissions from
ships: 1. Update of emission factors, Swedish Environment Research
Institute, Norrköping, Sweden,
available: <a href="http://www.smed.se/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/SMED_Report_2004_4.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.smed.se/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/SMED_Report_2004_4.pdf</a> (last access: 6 February 2019), 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Corbett, J. J., Winebrake, J. J., Green, E. H., Kasibhatla, P., Eyring, V.,
and Lauer, A.: Mortality from ship emissions: A global assessment, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 41, 8512–8518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es071686z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es071686z</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Endresen, O., Sorgard, E., Sundet, J. K., Dalsoren, S. B., Isaksen, I. S. A.,
Berglen, T. F., and Gravir, G.: Emission from international sea
transportation and environmental impact, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
108, 17,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002898" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002898</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Eyring, V., Kohler, H. W., van Aardenne, J., and Lauer, A.: Emissions from
international shipping: 1. The last 50 years, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
110, D17305, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005619" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005619</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Eyring, V., Isaksen, I. S. A., Berntsen, T., Collins, W. J., Corbett, J. J.,
Endresen, O., Grainger, R. G., Moldanova, J., Schlager, H., and Stevenson, D.
S.: Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Shipping, Atmos. Environ.,
44, 4735–4771, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.059</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. and Pitts, J. N.: Chemistry of the upper and lower
atmosphere: theory, experiments and applications, Academic
Press, San Diego, USA,  2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fridell, E., Steen, E., and Peterson, K.: Primary particles in ship
emissions, Atmos. Environ., 42, 1160–1168,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.042</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, Q., Shen, Y., and Zhang, J.: On the ship pollutant emission inventory in
Shanghai port, J. Safety Environ., 12, 57–64, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, X. M., Yang, L. X., Cheng, S. H., Gao, R., Zhou, Y., Xue, L. K., Shou,
Y. P., Wang, J., Wang, X. F., Nie, W., Xu, P. J., and Wang, W. X.:
Semi-continuous measurement of water-soluble ions in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Jinan,
China: Temporal variations and source apportionments, Atmos. Environ., 45,
6048–6056, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.041</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, Y., Lee, S. C., Huang, Y., Chow, J. C., and Watson, J. G.: Chemical
characterization and source apportionment of size-resolved particles in Hong
Kong sub-urban area, Atmos. Res., 170, 112–122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.015</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gariazzo, C., Papaleo, V., Pelliccioni, A., Calori, G., Radice, P., and
Tinarelli, G.: Application of a Lagrangian particle model to assess the
impact of harbour, industrial and urban activities on air quality in the
Taranto area, Italy, Atmos. Environ., 41, 6432–6444,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.005</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hassellöv, I.-M., Turner, R. D., Lauer, A., and Corbett, J.: Shipping
contributes to ocean acidification, 40, 2731–2736, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50521</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Healy, R. M., O'Connor, I. P., Hellebust, S., Allanic, A., Sodeau, J. R., and
Wenger, J. C.: Characterisation of single particles from in-port ship
emissions, Atmos. Environ., 43, 6408–6414,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.039</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
HKEPD: 2012 Hong Kong Emission Inventory Report, Hong Kong Environmental
Protection DepartmentEPD/TR X/14, 26, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
IMO: Revised MARPOL Annex IV, Organization, I. M., 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
IMO: Third IMO GHG Study 2014, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Jalkanen, J.-P., Brink, A., Kalli, J., Pettersson, H., Kukkonen, J., and
Stipa, T.: A modelling system for the exhaust emissions of marine traffic and
its application in the Baltic Sea area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9209–9223,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9209-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9209-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Jalkanen, J. P., Johansson, L., and Kukkonen, J.: A comprehensive inventory
of the ship traffic exhaust emissions in the Baltic Sea from 2006 to 2009,
Ambio, 43, 311–324, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0389-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0389-3</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jalkanen, J.-P., Johansson, L., and Kukkonen, J.: A comprehensive inventory
of ship traffic exhaust emissions in the European sea areas in 2011, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 71–84, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-71-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-71-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kattner, L., Mathieu-Üffing, B., Burrows, J. P., Richter, A., Schmolke,
S., Seyler, A., and Wittrock, F.: Monitoring compliance with sulfur content
regulations of shipping fuel by in situ measurements of ship emissions,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10087–10092,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10087-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10087-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Khoder, M. I.: Atmospheric conversion of sulfur dioxide to particulate
sulfate and nitrogen dioxide to particulate nitrate and gaseous nitric acid
in an urban area, Chemosphere, 49, 675–684,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00391-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00391-0</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kweon, C. B., Okada, S., Stetter, J. C., Christenson, C. G., Shafer, M. M.,
Schauer, J. J., and Foster, D. E.: Effect of Fuel Composition on Combustion and Detailed Chemical/Physical Characteristics of Diesel Exhaust, 112, 1668–1687, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-1899" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-1899</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A., Cappa, C. D., Langridge, J., Bahreini, R., Buffaloe, G., Brock,
C., Cerully, K., Coffman, D., Hayden, K., Holloway, J., Lerner, B., Massoli,
P., Li, S.-M., McLaren, R., Middlebrook, A. M., Moore, R., Nenes, A.,
Nuaaman, I., Onasch, T. B., Peischl, J., Perring, A., Quinn, P. K., Ryerson,
T., Schwartz, J. P., Spackman, R., Wofsy, S. C., Worsnop, D., Xiang, B., and
Williams, E.: Impact of Fuel Quality Regulation and Speed Reductions on
Shipping Emissions: Implications for Climate and Air Quality, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 45, 9052–9060, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es2013424" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es2013424</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lai, H. K., Tsang, H., Chau, J., Lee, C. H., McGhee, S. M., Hedley, A. J.,
and Wong, C. M.: Health impact assessment of marine emissions in Pearl River
Delta region, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 66, 158–163,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.09.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.09.029</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lake, D. A., Tolocka, M. P., Johnston, M. V., and Wexler, A. S.: The
character of single particle sulfate in Baltimore, Atmos. Environ., 38,
5311–5320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.067</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lauer, A., Eyring, V., Hendricks, J., Jöckel, P., and Lohmann, U.: Global
model simulations of the impact of ocean-going ships on aerosols, clouds, and
the radiation budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5061–5079,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5061-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5061-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lawrence, S., Sokhi, R., Ravindra, K., Mao, H., Prain, H. D., and Bull, I.
D.: Source apportionment of traffic emissions of particulate matter using
tunnel measurements, Atmos. Environ., 77, 548–557,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.040</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, R., Pedley, J., and Hobbs, C.: Fuel Quality Impact on Heavy Duty Diesel
Emissions: A Literature Review, SAE Transactions, 107, 1952–1970,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4271/982649" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4271/982649</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Yuan, Z., Ou, J., Fan, X., Ye, S., Xiao, T., Shi, Y., Huang, Z., Ng,
S. K. W., Zhong, Z., and Zheng, J.: An AIS-based high-resolution ship
emission inventory and its uncertainty in Pearl River Delta region, China,
Sci. Total Environ., 573, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.219" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.219</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Li, F. H., Zhang, Y. J., Zhang, J., Yuan, Y., Wu, L., and Mao, H. J.:
Characteristics of Particulate and Inorganic Elements of Motor Vehicles Based
on a Tunnel Environment, Huanjing Kexue, 39, 1014–1022,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201706226" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201706226</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X., Li, S., Xiong, Q., Yang, X., Qi, M., Zhao, W., and Wang, X.:
Characteristics of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Chemical Compositions and Their Effect on
Atmospheric Visibility in Urban Beijing, China during the Heating Season,
Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 15, 1924, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091924" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091924</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X. H., Wang, S. X., Duan, L., Hao, J. M., Li, C., Chen, Y. S., and Yang,
L.: Particulate and trace gas emissions from open burning of wheat straw and
corn stover in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6052–6058,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0705137" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0705137</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X. H., Wang, S. X., Duan, L., Hao, J. M., and Nie, Y. F.: Carbonaceous
Aerosol Emissions from Household Biofuel Combustion in China, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 43, 6076–6081, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803330j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es803330j</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, H., Fu, M. L., Jin, X. X., Shang, Y., Shindell, D., Faluvegi, G.,
Shindell, C., and He, K. B.: Health and climate impacts of ocean-going
vessels in East Asia, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 1037–1041, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3083" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3083</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, G., Brook, J. R., Alfarra, M. R., Anlauf, K., Leaitch, W. R., Sharma, S.,
Wang, D., Worsnop, D. R., and Phinney, L.: Identification and
characterization of inland ship plumes over Vancouver, BC, Atmos. Environ.,
40, 2767–2782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.054</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Lv, Z., Liu, H., Ying, Q., Fu, M., Meng, Z., Wang, Y., Wei, W., Gong, H., and
He, K.: Impacts of shipping emissions on PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution in China,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15811–15824,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15811-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15811-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Makkonen, U., Virkkula, A., Mäntykenttä, J., Hakola, H., Keronen, P.,
Vakkari, V., and Aalto, P. P.: Semi-continuous gas and inorganic aerosol
measurements at a Finnish urban site: comparisons with filters, nitrogen in
aerosol and gas phases, and aerosol acidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
5617–5631, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5617-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5617-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Matthias, V., Bewersdorff, I., Aulinger, A., and Quante, M.: The contribution
of ship emissions to air pollution in the North Sea regions, Environ.
Pollut., 158, 2241–2250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.013</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
McLaren, R., Wojtal, P., Majonis, D., McCourt, J., Halla, J. D., and Brook,
J.: NO<sub>3</sub> radical measurements in a polluted marine environment:
links to ozone formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4187–4206,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4187-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4187-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
McLaren, R., Wojtal, P., Halla, J. D., Mihele, C., and Brook, J. R.: A survey
of NO<sub>2</sub> : SO<sub>2</sub> emission ratios measured in marine vessel plumes in
the Strait of Georgia, Atmos. Environ., 46, 655–658,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.044</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Moldanová, J., Fridell, E., Popovicheva, O., Demirdjian, B., Tishkova,
V., Faccinetto, A., and Focsa, C.: Characterisation of particulate matter and
gaseous emissions from a large ship diesel engine, Atmos. Environ., 43,
2632–2641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.008</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Moreno, N., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Artinano, B., Guerra, A., Luaces, J.
A., Lorente, A., and Basora, J.: Characterisation of dust material emitted
during harbour operations (HADA Project), Atmos. Environ., 41, 6331–6343,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.028</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
MOT: Implementation of the Ship Emission Control Area in Pearl River Delta,
the Yangtze River Delta and the Bohai Rim (Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei area),
Ministry of Transport, C., No. 11, Jianguomen Inner Street, Beijing, China, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
NOAA: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory),
available at: <a href="https://www.arl.noaa.gov/hysplit/hysplit/" target="_blank">https://www.arl.noaa.gov/hysplit/hysplit/</a> (last access: 4 May 2017), 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Oanh, N. T. K., Thiansathit, W., Bond, T. C., Subramanian, R., Winijkul, E.,
and Paw-armart, I.: Compositional characterization of PM<sub>2.5</sub> emitted from
in-use diesel vehicles, Atmos. Environ., 44, 15–22,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.005</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Ohta, S. and Okita, T.: A chemical characterization of atmospheric aerosol in
Sapporo, Atmos. Environ., 24, 815–822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90282-r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90282-r</a>,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Ostro, B.: Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in two southern
California counties, Environ. Res., 70, 98–104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1995.1053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1995.1053</a>,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Petzold, A., Weingartner, E., Hasselbach, I., Lauer, P., Kurok, C., and
Fleischer, F.: Physical Properties, Chemical Composition, and Cloud Forming
Potential of Particulate Emissions from a Marine Diesel Engine at Various
Load Conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 3800–3805,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es903681z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es903681z</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Press, C. P.: China Port Yearbook 2017, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Röösli, M., Theis, G., Künzli, N., Staehelin, J., Mathys, P.,
Oglesby, L., Camenzind, M., and Braun-Fahrlander, C.: Temporal and spatial
variation of the chemical composition of PM<sub>10</sub> at urban and rural sites
in the Basel area, Switzerland, Atmos. Environ., 35, 3701–3713,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00511-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00511-2</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Sinha, P., Hobbs, P. V., Yokelson, R. J., Christian, T. J., Kirchstetter, T.
W., and Bruintjes, R.: Emissions of trace gases and particles from two ships
in the southern Atlantic Ocean, Atmos. Environ., 37, 2139–2148,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00080-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00080-3</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Sippula, O., Stengel, B., Sklorz, M., Streibel, T., Rabe, R., Orasche, J.,
Lintelmann, J., Michalke, B., Abbaszade, G., Radischat, C., Groeger, T.,
Schnelle-Kreis, J., Harndorf, H., and Zimmermann, R.: Particle Emissions from
a Marine Engine: Chemical Composition and Aromatic Emission Profiles under
Various Operating Conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11721–11729,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502484z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es502484z</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Song, Y. N.: Research of emission inventory and emission character of inland
and offshore ships, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Stips, A., Bolding, K., Macías, D., Bruggeman, J., and Eayrs, C.:
Scoping report on the potential impact of on-board desulphurisation on the
water quality in SO<sub><i>x</i></sub> Emission Control, European Commission, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2788/336630" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2788/336630</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, L., Fairley, D., Kleeman, M. J., and Harley, R. A.: Effects of Switching
to Lower Sulfur Marine Fuel Oil on Air Quality in the San Francisco Bay Area,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 10171–10178, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es401049x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es401049x</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Terzi, E., Argyropoulos, G., Bougatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., Nikolaou, K.,
and Samara, C.: Chemical composition and mass closure of ambient PM<sub>10</sub> at
urban sites, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2231–2239,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.019</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Thorpe, A. and Harrison, R. M.: Sources and properties of non-exhaust
particulate matter from road traffic: A review, Sci. Total Environ., 400,
270–282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.007</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Tolis, E. I., Saraga, D. E., Filiou, K. F., Tziavos, N. I., Tsiaousis, C. P.,
Dinas, A., and Bartzis, J. G.: One-year intensive characterization on
PM<sub>2.5</sub> nearby port area of Thessaloniki, Greece, Environ. Sci. Pollut.
Res., 22, 6812–6826, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3883-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3883-7</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Tronstad Lund, M., Eyring, V., Fuglestvedt, J., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A.,
Lee, D., and Righi, M.: Global-Mean Temperature Change from Shipping toward
2050: Improved Representation of the Indirect Aerosol Effect in Simple
Climate Models, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 8868–8877,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301166e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es301166e</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, D. R., Hassellöv, I.-M., Ytreberg, E., and Rutgersson, A.: Shipping
and the environment: Smokestack emissions, scrubbers and unregulated oceanic consequences, Elem. Sci. Anth., 5, 45, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.167</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, D. R., Edman, M., Gallego Urrea, J., Claremar, B., Hassellöv,
I.-M., Omstedt, A., and Rutgersson, A.: The potential future
contribution of shipping to acidification of the Baltic Sea, AMBIO, 47, 368–378, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0950-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0950-6</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
UNCTAD: World seaborne trade by types of cargo and by group of economies, annual,
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, available at: <a href="https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=32363" target="_blank">https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=32363</a>, last access: 5 March 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Viana, M., Hammingh, P., Colette, A., Querol, X., Degraeuwe, B., de Vlieger,
I., and van Aardenne, J.: Impact of maritime transport emissions on coastal
air quality in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 90, 96–105,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.046</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Viana, M., Fann, N., Tobias, A., Querol, X., Rojas-Rueda, D., Plaza, A.,
Aynos, G., Conde, J. A., Fernandez, L., and Fernandez, C.: Environmental and
Health Benefits from Designating the Marmara Sea and the Turkish Straits as
an Emission Control Area (ECA), Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 3304–3313,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5049946" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es5049946</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Zhuang, G. S., Tang, A. H., Yuan, H., Sun, Y. L., Chen, S. A., and
Zheng, A. H.: The ion chemistry and the source of PM2.5 aerosol in Beijing,
Atmos. Environ., 39, 3771–3784, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.013</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Weckwerth, G.: Verification of traffic emitted aerosol components in the
ambient air of Cologne (Germany), Atmos. Environ., 35, 5525–5536,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00234-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00234-5</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Wedepohl, K. H.: The composition of the continental-crust, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Acta, 59, 1217–1232, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, E. J., Lerner, B. M., Murphy, P. C., Herndon, S. C., and Zahniser,
M. S.: Emissions of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, CO, and HCHO from
commercial marine shipping during Texas Air Quality Study (TexAQS) 2006, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D21306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012094" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012094</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Winebrake, J. J., Corbett, J. J., Green, E. H., Lauer, A., and Eyring, V.:
Mitigating the Health Impacts of Pollution from Oceangoing Shipping: An
Assessment of Low-Sulfur Fuel Mandates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43,
4776–4782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803224q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es803224q</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Winnes, H. and Fridell, E.: Emissions of NO<sub><i>X</i></sub> and particles
from manoeuvring ships, Transport Res. D-Tr. E., 15, 204–211,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.02.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.02.003</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Winnes, H., Moldanova, J., Anderson, M., and Fridell, E.: On-board
measurements of particle emissions from marine engines using fuels with
different sulphur content, P. I. Mech. Eng. M-J. Eng., 230, 45–54,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090214530877" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090214530877</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Wojtal, P., Halla, J. D., and McLaren, R.: Pseudo steady states of HONO
measured in the nocturnal marine boundary layer: a conceptual model for HONO
formation on aqueous surfaces, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3243–3261,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3243-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3243-2011</a>, 2011.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Xiao, Q., Li, M., Liu, H., Fu, M., Deng, F., Lv, Z., Man, H., Jin, X., Liu,
S., and He, K.: Characteristics of marine shipping emissions at berth:
profiles for particulate matter and volatile organic compounds, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 18, 9527–9545, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9527-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9527-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Xing, H., Duan, S. L., Huang, L. Z., and Liu, Q. N.: AIS data-based
estimation of emissions from sea-going ships in Bohai Sea areas, China
Environ. Sci., 36, 953–960, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, M., Bell, T. G., Hopkins, F. E., and Smyth, T. J.: Attribution of
atmospheric sulfur dioxide over the English Channel to dimethyl sulfide and
changing ship emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4771–4783,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4771-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4771-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Yao, X. H., Chan, C. K., Fang, M., Cadle, S., Chan, T., Mulawa, P., He, K.
B., and Ye, B. M.: The water-soluble ionic composition of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in
Shanghai and Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 36, 4223–4234,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00342-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00342-4</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, T., Zhao, D., Song, X., and Zhu, T.: NO<sub>2</sub>-initiated multiphase
oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> by O<sub>2</sub> on CaCO<sub>3</sub> particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6679–6689, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6679-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6679-2018</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Zetterdahl, M., Moldanova, J., Pei, X., Pathak, R. K., and Demirdjian, B.:
Impact of the 0.1&thinsp;% fuel sulfur content limit in SECA on particle and
gaseous emissions from marine vessels, Atmos. Environ., 145, 338–345,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.022</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Lang, J., Wen, W., Cheng, S., and Wang, G.: Pollution
Characteristics and Regional Transmission of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Tangshan, J.
Beijing Univ. Technol., 43, 1252–1262, <a href="https://doi.org/10.11936/bjutxb2016090045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.11936/bjutxb2016090045</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, M. J., Zhang, Y., Ma, W. C., Fu, Q. Y., Yang, X., Li, C. L., Zhou, B.,
Yu, Q., and Chen, L. M.: Characteristics and ship traffic source
identification of air pollutants in China's largest port, Atmos. Environ.,
64, 277–286, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.007</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
