Enhancement of secondary organic aerosol formation and its oxidation state by SO 2 during photooxidation of 2-methoxyphenol

2-Methoxyphenol (guaiacol) is derived from the lignin pyrolysis and taken as a potential tracer for wood smoke emissions. In this work, the effect of SO2 at atmospheric levels (0–56 ppbv) on secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation and its oxidation state during guaiacol photooxidation was investigated in the presence of various inorganic seed particles (i.e., NaCl and (NH4)2SO4). Without SO2 and seed particles, SOA yields ranged from (9.46± 1.71) % to (26.37± 2.83) % and could be well expressed by a one-product model. According to the ratio of the average gas-particle partitioning timescale (τ g−p) over the course of the experiment to the vapor wall deposition timescale (τg−w), the determined SOA yields were underestimated by a factor of∼ 2. The presence of SO2 resulted in enhancing SOA yield by 14.04 %–23.65 %. With (NH4)2SO4 and NaCl seed particles, SOA yield was enhanced by 23.07 % and 29.57 %, respectively, which further increased significantly to 29.78 %– 53.43 % in the presence of SO2, suggesting that SO2 and seed particles have a synergetic contribution to SOA formation. The decreasing trend of the τ g−p/τg−w ratio in the presence of seed particles and SO2 suggested that more SOA-forming vapors partitioned into the particle phase, consequently increasing SOA yields. It should be noted that SO2 was found to be in favor of increasing the carbon oxidation state (OSC) of SOA, indicating that the functionalization or the partitioning of highly oxidized products into particles should be more dominant than the oligomerization. In addition, the average N/C ratio of SOA was 0.037, which revealed that NOx participated in the photooxidation process, consequently leading to the formation of organic N-containing compounds. The experimental results demonstrate the importance of SO2 on the formation processes of SOA and organic S-containing compounds and are also helpful to further understand SOA formation from the atmospheric photooxidation of guaiacol and its subsequent impacts on air quality and climate.

As a representative type of methoxyphenols, guaiacol mainly exists in the gas phase and is widely found in the atmosphere (Schauer et al., 2001).Its emission factor of wood burning is in the range of 172-279 mg kg −1 wood (Schauer et al., 2001).In recent years, the reactivity of gas-phase guaiacol toward OH radicals (Coeur-Tourneur et al., 2010a), NO 3 radicals (Lauraguais et al., 2016;Yang et al., 2016), Cl atoms (Lauraguais et al., 2014a), and O 3 (El Zein et al., 2015) has been investigated, suggesting that its degradation by OH and NO 3 radicals might be predominant in the atmosphere.Meanwhile, several studies have reported the significant secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from guaiacol oxidation by OH radicals, produced from the photolysis of the OH precursors (i.e., H 2 O 2 and CH 3 ONO) (Ahmad et al., 2017;Lauraguais et al., 2014b;Yee et al., 2013).However, SOA formation from the photooxidation of guaiacol in the presence of NO x has not been investigated without adding a direct OH precursor, even though it has been recently reported that the atmospheric level of NO x could reach up to 200 ppbv in severely polluted atmospheres of China (Li et al., 2017).
Although many studies concentrated on the SOA production from the oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), the reported SOA yields showed high variability for a given precursor (Chu et al., 2016(Chu et al., , 2017;;Ge et al., 2017a;Lauraguais et al., 2012Lauraguais et al., , 2014b;;Ng et al., 2007;Sarrafzadeh et al., 2016;Yee et al., 2013).This variability is mainly dependent on the numerous factors, e.g., preexisting seed particles, SO 2 level, NO x level, humidity, and temperature.Two of the critical factors are the impacts of preexisting seed particles and SO 2 level on SOA formation (Chu et al., 2016(Chu et al., , 2017;;Ge et al., 2017a).In addition, the atmospheric concentration of SO 2 could be close to 200 ppbv in severely polluted atmospheres of China, and SOA from biomass burning and sulfate formation could significantly contribute to severe haze pollution (Li et al., 2017).During the transport process, smoke plumes from biomass burning would be inevitably mixed with suspended particles (e.g., (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 particles), SO 2 , and NO x in the atmosphere.However, the influences of these co-existing pollutants on the transformation of guaiacol and its SOA formation are still unclear.For these reasons, the aim of this work was to investigate the SOA formation from guaiacol photooxidation in the presence of NO x in a 30 m 3 indoor smog chamber, as well as the effect of SO 2 on SOA formation with various inorganic seed particles.

Smog chamber
The photooxidation experiments were performed in a 30 m 3 indoor smog chamber (4 m height × 2.5 m width × 3 m length), which was built in a temperature-controlled room located at the Research Center for Eco-Environment Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (RCEES-CAS).The details have been described elsewhere (Chen et al., 2019) and are shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement.Briefly, 120 UV lamps (365 nm, Philips TL 60/10R) were taken as the light source with a NO 2 photolysis rate of 0.55 min −1 , which was comparable to the irradiation intensity at noon in Beijing (Chou et al., 2011).A maglev fan installed at the bottom center of the smog chamber was used to mix sufficiently the introduced gas species and seed particles.Temperature (T ) and relatively humidity (RH) in the chamber were (302 ± 1) K and (39 ± 1) %, respectively.Before each experiment, the chamber was flushed by purified dry zero air for ∼ 36 h with a flow rate of 100 L min −1 until the particle number concentration in the chamber was lower than 20 cm −3 .

Experimental procedures
Gas-phase guaiacol was firstly introduced into the chamber by purified dry zero air flowing through the gently heated injector with a known volume of pure liquid guaiacol until guaiacol fully vaporized.Its concentration in the chamber was measured in real time by a high-resolution protontransfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-PTRMS) (Ionicon Analytik GmbH) and was calibrated by a commercial permeation tube (VICI AG International Valco Instruments Co., Inc.).When guaiacol concentration was stable, NO and SO 2 were introduced into the chamber by a mass flow meter using purified dry zero air as the carrier gas.Their concentrations were controlled by the injection time preset through the electromagnetic valve and were measured by a NO x analyzer (model 42i-TL, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and a SO 2 analyzer (model 43i, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), respectively.In this work, the initial ratio (V /V ) of guaiacol concentration to NO x concentration in the chamber was similar in all experiments (∼ 1.2) (Tables 1 and 2).In addition, sodium chloride (NaCl) and ammonium sulfate ((NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ) were used as the inorganic seeds.The seed aerosols in the chamber were generated by the atomization of a 0.02 M aqueous solution.Through atomization, the size distribution of seed particles peaked at 51-58 nm was achieved, with a number concentration of 10 100-11 400 cm −3 (Table 2).After gas species and seed particles in the chamber were mixed well, the photooxidation experiment was carried out with the fan turned off.In this work, the OH concentrations in the chamber were (1.3-2.2) × 10 6 molecules cm −3 , calculated based on the degradation rate (7.53×10 −11 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 ) of guaiacol with OH radicals (Coeur-Tourneur et al., 2010a).The chemicals and gas samples used in this work were described in Supplement.

Data analysis
The HR-ToF-PTRMS with a time resolution of 1 min was used online to measure the gas-phase concentration of guaiacol, and its m/z range was 10-500 in the process of data acquisition.Before data collection, the peaks of the protonated water ([H 18  3 O] + ) and protonated acetone ([C 3 H 7 O] + ) ions at m/z = 21.0246 and 59.0491 were used for mass calibration, with the aim of obtaining accurate mass determination during the experimental process.All data obtained by the HR-ToF-PTRMS were analyzed with the PTR-MS Viewer software (version 3.1.0,IONICON Analytik).
An Aerodyne high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS) was applied to online measure the chemical composition of particles and the non-refractory submicron aerosol mass (DeCarlo et al., 2006).For all experiments, the acquisition time of the HR-ToF-AMS was 2 min.The inlet flow rate, ionization efficiency, and particle sizing of the HR-ToF-AMS were calibrated at regular intervals, according to the standard protocols using the size-selected pure ammonium nitrate particles (Drewnick et al., 2005;Jimenez et al., 2003).All data obtained by the HR-ToF-AMS were analyzed by the ToF-AMS analysis toolkit SQUIR-REL 1.57I/PIKA 1.16I version, in Igor Pro version 6.37.The size distribution and concentration of particles were monitored by a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS), which is composed of a differential mobility analyzer (DMA) (model 3082, TSI Inc.) and a condensation particle counter (CPC) (model 3776, TSI Inc.).Assuming that particles are spherical and non-porous, the average particle density could be calculated to be 1.4 g cm −3 using the equation ρ = d va /d m (DeCarlo et al., 2004), where d va is the mean vacuum aerodynamic diameter measured by the HR-ToF-AMS and d m is the mean volume-weighted mobility diameter measured by the SMPS.The mass concentration of particles measured by the HR-ToF-AMS was corrected by the SMPS data in this work using the same method as Gordon et al. (2014).In this work, the wall loss rate (k dep ) of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 particles could be expressed as k dep = 4.15 × 10 −7 × D 1.89 p + 1.39 × D −0.88 p (D p is the particle diameter, nm), which was measured according to the literature method (Takekawa et al., 2003) and was used to correct the wall loss of SOA.In addition, its wall loss rate was determined at predetermined time intervals, which only had a slight change among different experiments.

Vapor wall-loss correction
Previous studies have indicated that the losses of SOAforming vapors to chamber walls can result in the substantial and systematic underestimation of SOA yield (Zhang et al., 2014(Zhang et al., , 2015)).Therefore, SOA yields obtained in this work were also corrected by vapor wall loss.The effect of vapor wall deposition on SOA yields mainly depends on the competition between the uptake of organic vapors by aerosol particles and the chamber wall (Zhang et al., 2015).Thus, the ratio of the average gas-particle partitioning timescale (τ g−p ) over the course of the experiment to the vapor wall deposition timescale (τ g−w ) could be reasonably used to evaluate the underestimation of SOA yields.The detailed calculation of τ g−p and τ g−w was shown in the Supplement.

SOA yields
A series of experiments were conducted at different guaiacol/NO x concentrations under atmospheric pressure.The experimental conditions and results are shown in Table 1.SOA yield was calculated to be the ratio of SOA mass concentration (M o , µg m −3 ) to the consumed guaiacol concentration ( [guaiacol], µg m −3 ) at the end of each experiment (Kang et al., 2007).The results showed that SOA yield was dependent on the initial guaiacol concentration ([Guaiacol] 0 ).Higher precursor concentration would result in a higher amount of condensable products, subsequently enhancing SOA formation (Lauraguais et al., 2012).In addition, it should be noted that SOA mass could directly affect the gas-particle partitioning via acting as the adsorption medium of oxidation products; thus, higher SOA mass generally leads to a higher SOA yield (Lauraguais et al., 2014b).
SOA yield (Y ) could be represented by a widely used semi-empirical model based on the absorptive gas-particle partitioning of semi-volatile products, typically calculated using the following equation (Odum et al., 1996): where α i is the mass-based stoichiometric coefficient for the reaction producing the semi-volatile product i, K om,i is the gas-particle partitioning equilibrium constant, and M o is the total aerosol mass concentration.
The yield curve for guaiacol photooxidation is shown in Fig. 1, obtained by plotting the SOA yield data in Table 1 according to Eq. ( 1).The yield data were accurately reproduced by a one-product model (R 2 = 0.97), while two or more products used in the model did not significantly improve the fitting quality.The obtained values of α i and K om,i for one-product model were (0.27 ± 0.01) and (0.033 ± 0.008) m 3 µg −1 , respectively.In previous studies, the one-product model was widely applied to describe SOA yields from the oxidation of aromatic compounds including methoxyphenols (Coeur-Tourneur et al., 2010b;Lauraguais et al., 2012Lauraguais et al., , 2014b)).In this work, this simulation suggests that the products in SOA have similar values of α i and K om,i , i.e., the obtained α i and K om,i are the average values.The Table 1.Experimental conditions and results for guaiacol photooxidation in the presence NO x .plot shown in Fig. S2 is the relationship between M o versus [guaiacol], of which slope (0.28) is slightly higher than α i value (0.27).This suggests that the formed low-volatile products almost completely partitioned into the particle-phase according to the theoretical partition model (Lauraguais et al., 2012(Lauraguais et al., , 2014b)).

Exp. [Guaiacol
In the previous studies, the significant SOA formation from the OH-initiated reaction of guaiacol has been reported (Lauraguais et al., 2014b;Yee et al., 2013).In this work, SOA yields for guaiacol photooxidation range from (9.46 ± 1.71) % to (26.37 ± 2.83) %, shown in Table 1.According to the ratios of τ g−p /τ g−w (0.61-0.93), the determined SOA yields were underestimated by a factor of ∼ 2, suggesting that vapor wall loss in the chamber could sig-nificantly affect SOA formation.The similar results were reported previously by Zhang et al. (2014), who observed that SOA yields for toluene photooxidation were substantially underestimated by factors of as much as 4, caused by vapor wall loss.As shown in Fig. 1, the vapor wall-losscorrected SOA yields were in the range of (15.24 ± 0.85) % to (50.89 ± 2.87) %, and could also be reproduced by a oneproduct model (R 2 = 0.96).This range overlaps SOA yields of 0.6 %-87 % for guaiacol oxidation under high NO x condition (∼ 10 ppmv NO), reported by Lauraguais et al. (2014b), using CH 3 ONO as the OH source.Under low NO x conditions (<5 ppbv NO), SOA yields for guaiacol oxidation were in the range of 44 %-50 %, reported by Yee et al. (2013) using H 2 O 2 as the OH source and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 as seed particles; they also indicated that high NO x concentration (>200 ppbv NO) played an opposite role in SOA formation.Overall, the vapor wall-loss-corrected SOA yields in this work are well in agreement with those reported previously (Lauraguais et al., 2014b;Yee et al., 2013), but the determined SOA yields are much lower.Therefore, the effect of vapor wall loss on SOA formation should be seriously taken into account.
In addition, the average N/C ratio of SOA for guaiacol photooxidation in the presence of NO x is 0.037, calculated according to the element analysis by the HR-ToF-AMS.This indicates that NO x participates in SOA formation and growth.This phenomenon is well supported by the previous studies, which have reported that the nitro-substituted products are the main products of the OH-initiated reaction of guaiacol in the presence of NO x (Ahmad et al., 2017;Lauraguais et al., 2014b).The relative low volatility of these products could reasonably contribute to SOA formation (Duporté et al., 2016;Liu et al., 2016a).The average NO + /NO + 2 ratio of SOA from guaiacol photooxidation is 4.08, which is higher than that (2.06-2.54)for ammonium nitrate, determined by the HR-ToF-AMS in this work.The possible explanation might be that nitro-organics and organonitrates both exist in SOA (Farmer et al., 2010;Sato et al., 2010).The relative abundance of organic N-containing compounds could be estimated from the average N/C ratio.Assuming that the oxidation products in the SOA retain seven carbon atoms, the yield of organic N-containing compounds is 25.9 %, which is the upper limit due to the possible C-C bond scission during photooxidation process.

SOA yields
In China, atmospheric SO 2 concentration is always in the range of several to dozens of parts per billion by volume, while in the severely polluted atmosphere it could be up to close 200 ppbv (Han et al., 2015;Li et al., 2017).In addition, a recent field measurement study has reported that the decrease in biogenic SOA mass concentration in the atmosphere has a positive correlation with SO 2 emission controls (Marais et al., 2017).Therefore, the effect of SO 2 at atmospheric levels on SOA formation from guaiacol photooxidation under atmospheric NO x conditions was investigated.The experimental conditions and results are shown in Table 2.The formation of SOA, sulfate, and nitrate as a function of SO 2 concentration for guaiacol photooxidation is shown in Fig. S3, and the time-series variations in the concentrations of sulfate and nitrate are shown in Fig. S4.The decays of guaiacol, NO x , and SO 2 are shown in Figs.S5a, S6a, and S7, respectively, which have similar changing trends for different experiments.As illustrated in Fig. 2, the induction period became shorter with the increase in SO 2 concentration.The similar results caused by SO 2 have also been reported previously (Chu et al., 2016;Liu et al., 2016b).Meanwhile, M o for the experiment without SO 2 (Exp. 1 in Table 2) increased from (63.62 ± 1.71) to (71.88 ± 1.43) and (78.59 ± 2.06) µg m −3 , enhanced by 12.98 % and 23.53 %, respectively, when SO 2 concentration raised from 0 to 33 and 56 ppbv.The corresponding SOA yields were (21.60 ± 1.27) % and (23.42 ± 1.80) %, respectively.The similar results were reported by previous studies (Kleindienst et al., 2006;Lin et al., 2013;Liu et al., 2016b), which observed the significant enhancement of SOA yields for VOC oxidation and the photochemical aging of gasoline vehicle exhaust in the presence of SO 2 .
As shown in Fig. 3, the τ g−p /τ g−w ratio decreased from 0.82 to 0.71 and 0.61 when the SO 2 concentration increased from 0 to 33 and 56 ppbv.It suggests that the sulfate formed via SO 2 oxidation could serve as seed particles (Jaoui et al., 2008) and increase the surface areas of particles (Xu et al., 2016).These roles are favorable to partitioning more SOAforming vapors into the particle phase (Zhang et al., 2014), consequently enhancing SOA yields.At the same time, as shown in Fig. S4 and Table 2, the sulfate concentration increased significantly from 7.42 to 17.89 µg m −3 when SO 2 concentration increased from 33 to 56 ppbv.Nevertheless, the particle peak attributed to sulfate formed via SO 2 oxidation was not observed by the SMPS during the experimental process due to the quick particle growth in the presence of organic vapors.In this work, it is difficult to completely remove    2).
traces of NH 3 from zero air; thus, the formed sulfate should be the mixture of H 2 SO 4 and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 .The time-series changes in the concentration of ammonium salt at different SO 2 concentrations are shown in Fig. S8.Its concentration increased obviously with increasing SO 2 concentration, suggesting that more (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 was produced.Similar results have also been reported recently by Chu et al. (2016).
In addition, the surface area concentration of aerosol particles at the end time was calculated.As shown in Table 2, the final surface area of aerosol particles formed via guaiacol photooxidation increased from 1.25 × 10 3 to 1.68 × 10 3 and 2.04 × 10 3 µm 2 cm −3 when SO 2 concentration increased from 0 to 33 and 56 ppbv.The increased surface area could be in favor of outcompeting the wall loss for low-volatility vapors produced from guaiacol photooxidation; i.e., more lowvolatility vapors would be diverted from wall loss to the particles, consequently increasing SOA yields (Kroll et al., 2007).This is well supported by the decrease in the τ g−p /τ g−w ratio with increasing SO 2 concentration, shown in Fig. 3.The time-series changes in the mass concentrations of NO + and NO + 2 are shown in Fig. S9a.The mass concentration of NO + increased more quickly than that of NO + 2 and had a positive correlation with SO 2 concentration.But compared to the experiment without SO 2 , the presence of SO 2 had little impact on NO + /NO + 2 and N/C ratios obtained at the end time, shown in Figs.S9b and S10b, respectively.These ratios indicated that organic N-containing compounds were also produced in this system (Farmer et al., 2010;Sato et al., 2010).

Oxidation state of SOA
The average carbon oxidation state (OS C =2O/C−H/C) of OA is widely used to represent the oxidation degree of atmospheric OA, because it takes into account the saturation level of carbon atoms in the OA (Kroll et al., 2011).As shown in Table 2, increasing SO 2 concentration (0-56 ppbv, Exps.1-3) leads to the increase in OS C (0.11-0.18).The variations in H/C, O/C, and N/C ratios as a function of irradiation time are shown in Fig. S10.In order to further identify the effect of SO 2 on the chemical properties of SOA, positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis for all AMS data obtained at different SO 2 concentrations over the course of the experiments was carried out.Two factors were obtained from the PMF analysis, and their mass spectra are shown in Fig. 4. The organic mass fraction of m/z = 44 (CO + 2 ), named f 44 , was 0.122 for Factor 2, which is higher than that (0.094) for Factor 1.Therefore, Factor 2 was tentatively assigned to the more-oxidized SOA, while Factor 1 was the lessoxidized SOA (Ulbrich et al., 2009).During the photooxidation process, these two factors had different variations as a function of irradiation time.As shown in Fig. S11, Factor 1 increased along with the reaction and then decreased, while Factor 2 had an increasing trend.Compared to Exps. 1 and 2 in Table 2, the higher fraction of Factor 2 mass obtained at 56 ppbv SO 2 (Exp.3 in Table 2) suggests that the formed SOA mainly consists of more-oxidized products with relatively low volatility.This is well supported by the time-series variations in the fraction of organic ion groups (CH + , CHO + , and CHO + gt1 -containing more than one oxygen atom) (Fig. S12a), which shows the higher fraction of CHO + gt1 and lower fraction of CH + obtained at higher SO 2 concentration, consequently resulting in a higher OS C of SOA.Previous studies mostly reported that the enhancement of SOA yield in the presence of SO 2 was ascribed to the functionalization and oligomerization reactions (Cao and Jang, 2007;Jaoui et al., 2008;Liu et al., 2016b;Xu et al., 2016).If the oligomerization reaction plays a predominant role in the presence of SO 2 which will lead to particle-phase H 2 SO 4 , the carbon number of oligomers will increase but their net O/C or H/C values will show little change, consequently resulting in little change in the oxidation state of SOA (Chen et al., 2011).Nevertheless, we observed that SO 2 not only enhanced SOA yields, but also resulted in higher OS C (Table 2 and Fig. 5).This suggests that the functionalization reaction might be predominant with SO 2 , which leads to higher OS C of products with low molecular weight (MW) (Ye et al., 2018), consequently resulting in an overall increase in OS C and SOA yields.More recently, Ye et al. (2018) also found the similar results in the ozonolysis of limonene.Figure S13 shows the differences among the normalized mass spectra of SOA formed at different SO 2 concentrations.As shown in Fig. S13a, the signal fractions from the low-MW species were enhanced significantly in the presence of SO 2 and were much higher than those from the high-MW species (m/z>300).The similar results were also observed in Fig. S13b when increasing SO 2 concentration.In other words, SO 2 played a more important role in the formation of organic S-containing compounds and the formation or uptake of low-MW species, compared to the formation of high-MW species (i.e., oligomers) that should be reasonably produced via the acid-catalyzed heterogeneous reactions (Cao and Jang, 2007;Jaoui et al., 2008;Liu et al., 2016b;Xu et al., 2016).
In this work, assuming that all organic S-containing compounds are organosulfates and have the same response factor and fragmentation as methyl sulfate, the conservative lowerbound concentration of organosulfates was calculated to be in the range of (2.1 ± 0.8) to (4.3 ± 1.7) ng m −3 using the method described by Huang et al. (2015) shown in the Supplement and increased with the increase in SO 2 concentration.This concentration range is close to those derived from the atmospheric oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and alkane (Meade et al., 2016;Riva et al., 2015).Figure S14 is the examples of the ions (i.e., CSO + , CH 3 SO + 2 , and CH 3 SO + 3 ) of methyl sulfate obtained at 56 ppbv SO 2 (Exp.3 in Table 2).On the other hand, sulfuric acid formed from SO 2 may be favorable for the uptake of water-soluble low-MW species (e.g., small carboxylic acids and aldehydes) and also be helpful for retaining them in the aerosol phase, which would result in the increase in OS C .This is well supported by the time-series variations in the concentrations of acetic acid at different SO 2 concentrations measured by the HR-ToF-PTRMS (Fig. S15a), which shows that acetic acid concentration decreased with the increase in SO 2 concentration (0-56 ppbv).These results were in good agreement with those reported by Liggio et al. (2005) and Liu et al. (2010), who observed that the uptake of organic compounds under acidic conditions would be enhanced significantly.Recently, Huang et al. (2016) have also reported that acetic acid is present in SOA formed via α-pinene ozonolysis and its uptake would increase in the presence of seed particles.In addition, Krapf et al. (2016) have indicated that peroxides in SOA are unstable and liable to decompose into volatile compounds, consequently leading to decreases in SOA yield and OS C .But Ye et al. (2018) found that the reactions of SO 2 with organic peroxides were the dominant sink of SO 2 , initiated by the heterogeneous uptake of SO 2 under humidity conditions.These reactions would result in the formation of organic S-containing compounds, consequently increasing SOA yields and OS C .

Effect of inorganic seed particles on SOA formation
Seed particles are one of the critical factors influencing SOA formation (Ge et al., 2017a); thus, the effects of inorganic seeds (i.e., NaCl and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ) on SOA formation from guaiacol photooxidation were investigated.As shown in Fig. 6, the presence of inorganic seed particles could accelerate the SOA growth rate at the initial stage of photooxidation (i.e., it would shorten the induction period), followed by the decrease in the growth rate along with the reaction, because the presence of inorganic seeds could promote the condensation of SOA-forming organic products and consequently increase SOA formation (Yee et al., 2013).The results showed that M o for the experiment without seed particles (Exp. 1 in Table 2) increased from (63.62 ± 1.71) to (79.44 ± 1.86) and (84.91 ± 2.01) µg m −3 (Table 2), enhanced by 24.87 % and 33.46 %, respectively, with (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 and NaCl seed particles.The corresponding SOA yields were (23.31 ± 1.59) % and (24.54±1.73)%, respectively.In previous work, the similar results on the enhancements of SOA formation by NaCl and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 seed particles were reported in the oxidation of VOCs (Ge et al., 2017a, b;Huang et al., 2013Huang et al., , 2017)).As shown in Fig. 3, τ g−p /τ g−w ratios with (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 and NaCl seed particles were 0.62 and 0.54, respectively, which suggested that more SOA-forming vapors partitioned into the particle phase in the presence of NaCl seed particles (Zhang et al., 2014), consequently resulting in a relatively higher SOA yield.
As shown in Table 2 and Fig. 6, the SOA mass concentration in the presence of NaCl seed particles was higher than that in the presence of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 seed particles.In addition, the OS C of SOA in the presence of NaCl seed particles is 0.29, slightly higher than that (0.20) in the presence of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 seed particles.Recently, it has been also reported that the presence of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 and NaNO 3 seed particles could significantly enhance the oxidation state of SOA, compared to without seed particles (Huang et al., 2016).In this work, the experimental conditions for seed experiments are almost the same (Table 2), including reactant concentration, temperature, RH, and the number and diameter of seed particles.Therefore, the differences in the yield and  2).oxidation state of SOA resulted from the different chemical compositions of SOA in the presence of different inorganic seeds.As shown in Fig. S12b and c, compared to (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 seed particles, the higher fraction of CHO + gt1 and lower fraction of CH + were obtained with NaCl seed particles, consequently resulting in higher OS C of SOA.The time-series evolution of O/C, H/C, and N/C ratios is shown in Figs.S16 and S17, which indicate that O/C ratios (0.94-0.99) with NaCl seed particles at the end of experiments are higher than those (0.90-0.93) with (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 seed particles.Figure 7 shows the mass spectra of SOA in the presence of NaCl and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 seed particles obtained by the HR-ToF-AMS, as well as their difference mass spectrum.As shown in Fig. 7, f 44 for SOA in the presence of NaCl seed particles was higher than that obtained in the presence of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 seed particles, while the mass fractions of m/z = 15 (CH 3 ) and 29 (CHO) fragments were both lower.The m/z = 44 ion (CO + 2 ) is mainly contributed from acids or acid-derived species, such as esters (Ng et al., 2011).The higher f 44 of SOA with NaCl than (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 seed particles suggests that the distribution of highly oxidized small carboxylic acids onto seed particles plays an important role in SOA formation, consequently resulting in a higher oxidation state of SOA (Huang et al., 2016;Ng et al., 2011).Compared to (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , the hygroscopicity of NaCl is stronger (Ge et al., 2017a;Gysel et al., 2002).The molar ratio of H 2 O to NaCl is about 0.1 at 40 % RH, and water is mainly adsorbed on NaCl particles (Weis and Ewing, 1999).Thus, the greater water content on the particle surface could facilitate the uptake of highly oxidized small carboxylic acids onto NaCl particles, which might explain the higher SOA oxidation state observed in the presence of NaCl seed particles ( Huang et al., 2016).As shown in Fig. S15, the concentration of acetic acid in the gas phase with NaCl seed particles was lower than that with (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 seed particles.It suggests that the uptake of acetic acid on NaCl seed particles might be higher than that on (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 seed particles under similar experimental conditions (i.e., NO x and guaiacol concentrations, temperature, and RH).Moreover, the adsorbed acid products would also generate H + ions, which could catalyze heterogeneous reactions to produce more-oxidized products or oligomers with relatively low volatility (Fig. S18), consequently resulting in the enhancement of SOA formation (Huang et al., 2013(Huang et al., , 2017;;Cao and Jang, 2007;Jaoui et al., 2008;Liu et al., 2016b;Xu et al., 2016).
In addition, the possible formation of Cl atoms from the photolysis of nitryl chloride (ClNO 2 hυ −→ Cl + NO 2 , k 1 =∼ 10 −4 s −1 ) (Mielke et al., 2011) and the reaction of OH radicals with Cl − (Cl − +OH → Cl+OH − , k 2 =∼ 10 9 M −1 s −1 ) (Fang et al., 2014) would also initiate a series of reactions to oxidize SOA composition, which might be another reason for higher OS C observed with NaCl seed particles.According to the rate constant (10 9 M −1 s −1 ) (Fang et al., 2014), the uptake coefficient (3.4×10 −3 ) of OH radicals on NaCl particles (Park et al., 2008), and the concentrations of OH radicals and Cl − , the concentration of Cl atoms produced from the reaction of OH radical with Cl − was estimated to be less than 38 molecules cm −3 , which was much higher than that from the photolysis of ClNO 2 due to the slow photolysis rate constant of ∼ 10 −4 s −1 (Mielke et al., 2011).Compared to OH concentration in the chamber, the oxidation of SOA composition by Cl atoms should be insignificant.3, the τ g−p /τ g−w ratio had a decreasing trend when increasing SO 2 concentration in the presence of seed particles, suggesting that the underestimation of SOA yields caused by vapor wall loss was weakened significantly because of the additional sulfate formed from SO 2 oxidation.Thus, inorganic seed particles and SO 2 showed a synergetic effect on SOA formation.As shown in Table 2 and Fig. 5, it should be noted that OS C of SOA increased in the presence of SO 2 , which was well supported by the time-series variations in H/C, O/C, and N/C ratios at different SO 2 concentrations with NaCl and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 as seed particles, shown in Figs.S16 and S17.In addition, as shown in Fig. S12b and c, the higher fraction of CHO + gt1 and lower fraction of CH + were obtained at higher SO 2 concentration, consequently resulting in higher OS C of SOA. Figure S20 shows the mass spectra of SOA with NaCl and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 as seed particles at different SO 2 concentrations obtained by the HR-ToF-AMS.As illustrated in Fig. S20, SO 2 addition was in favor of increasing the value of f 44 , suggesting that more products with higher OS C are produced by the functionalization reaction (Ye et al., 2018).Meanwhile, Table 2 shows that the final surface area of aerosol particles increased in the presence of SO 2 , which played a positive role in diverting more low-volatility vapors from wall loss to the particles, consequently enhancing SOA yields (Kroll et al., 2007).In addition, the presence of inorganic seeds could promote the condensation of SOAforming organic products and the heterogeneous uptake of SO 2 (Yee et al., 2013), providing favorable conditions for the following reactions.Meanwhile, the higher hygroscopicity of NaCl than (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 might be helpful to dissolve more acid substances on NaCl particle surface (e.g., H 2 SO 4 and organic acid), especially in the presence of SO 2 .This hypothesis could be supported by the variations in acetic acid concentration in the presence of different seed particles and SO 2 concentrations (Fig. S15), which shows that acetic acid concentration decreased with the increase in SO 2 concentra-tion (0-54 ppbv).The dissolved acid compounds might be helpful to catalyze heterogeneous reactions (Cao and Jang, 2007;Huang et al., 2013Huang et al., , 2017;;Jaoui et al., 2008;Liu et al., 2016b;Xu et al., 2016).Figures S21 and S22 show the differences among the normalized mass spectra of SOA formed at different SO 2 concentrations with various seed particles.The results indicated that the signal fractions from the low-MW species increased significantly in the presence of SO 2 and were much higher than those from the high-MW species (m/z>300).Compared to Exps. 2 and 3 in Table 2 with no seed particles, the conservative lower-bound concentrations of organosulfates formed with seed particles were similar and in the range of (2.2 ± 0.7) to (4.6 ± 1.8) ng m −3 , which might be caused by the similar SO 2 concentrations applied for experiments.With NaCl and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 as seed particles, SOA yields and OS C both increased with the increase in SO 2 , suggesting that the functionalization reaction should be more dominant than the oligomerization reaction during photooxidation process.

Conclusions and atmospheric implications
In this work, SOA formation from guaiacol photooxidation in the presence of NO x was investigated in a 30 m 3 smog chamber.SOA yields for guaiacol photooxidation were in the range of (9.46 ± 1.71) % to (26.37 ± 2.83) % and could be expressed well by a one-product model.These yields were underestimated by a factor of ∼ 2 according to τ g−p /τ g−w ratios.The presence of SO 2 could increase SOA yield and OS C , indicating that the functionalization reaction should be more dominant than the oligomerization reaction.Meanwhile, the similar effect of SO 2 was also observed with NaCl and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 seed particles.But SOA yield and OS C in the presence of NaCl seed particles were both slightly higher than those in the presence of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 seed particles.In addition, the results indicated the synergetic contribution of SO 2 and inorganic seed particles to SOA formation.The decreasing trend of τ g−p /τ g−w ratio in the presence of seed particles and SO 2 suggested that more SOA-forming vapors partitioned into the particle phase, consequently increasing SOA yields.The average N/C ratio (0.037) of SOA suggested that NO x participated in the process of guaiacol photooxidation, resulting in the formation of organic N-containing compounds.
The significant SOA formation from guaiacol photooxidation at the atmospheric levels of SO 2 and NO x in this work suggests that more attention needs to be given to the SOA formation from biomass burning and its subsequent effects on haze evolution, especially in China with nationwide biomass burning, because recent studies have indicated that SOA formed from biomass burning plays an important role in haze pollution in China (Ding et al., 2017;Li et al., 2017).In addition, the results imply that the oxidation of SO 2 and VOCs are tightly coupled, and SO 2 has a direct impact on the physics and chemistry of SOA formation.Although guaiacol concentrations in the chamber study are higher than those in the ambient atmosphere, the results obtained in this work could provide new information for SOA formation from the photooxidation of methoxyphenols and might be useful for SOA modeling, especially for air quality simulation modeling of the specific regions experiencing serious pollution caused by fine particulate matter.In addition, the results would help to further understand the photochemical aging process of smoke plumes from biomass burning in the atmosphere.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.SOA yield as a function of SOA mass concentration (M o ) for guaiacol photooxidation in the presence of NO x at different guaiacol concentrations.The lines were fit to the experimental data using a one-product model.Values of α and K om,i used to generate the solid line were (0.27±0.01) and (0.033±0.008), and their values for the dashed line were (0.52 ± 0.03) and (0.025 ± 0.006), respectively.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Variations in the τ g−p /τ g−w ratio in the presence of various seed particles as a function of SO 2 concentration.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Mass spectra of Factor 1 (a) and Factor 2 (b) for the formed SOA identified by applying PMF analysis to the AMS data, obtained at different SO 2 concentrations over the course of the experiments.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. OS C of SOA formed in the presence of various seed particles as a function of SO 2 concentration.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Time-dependent growth curves of SOA mass concentration for guaiacol photooxidation in the presence of inorganic seed particles (Exps.1, 4, and 7 in Table2).

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Mass spectra of SOA with NaCl (a) and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 (b) as seed particles obtained by the HR-ToF-AMS, as well as their difference mass spectrum (c = a − b).

Table 2 .
Experimental conditions and results for guaiacol photooxidation in the presence of seed particles and SO Synergetic effect of SO 2 and inorganic seed particles on SOA formation According to the former results obtained in this work, it is known that SO 2 and inorganic seed particles both have a positive role in enhancing SOA formation.Therefore, their possible synergetic effects on SOA formation were investigated.Considering the experiments performed under the comparable conditions (Table2), the results should be reasonably reliable.The decays of guaiacol, NO x , and SO 2 are shown in Figs.S5, S6, and S7, respectively, which have the similar changing trends for different experiments.FigureS19shows the time-series evolution in the sulfate concentration in the presence of different SO 2 concentrations and seed particles, which indicates that sulfate concentration is dependent on SO 2 concentration.As shown in Fig.8, the addition of SO 2 into the chamber in the presence of inorganic seed par-